
Icelandic: 
"Sósíalisma er ekki kaldur krakkar!" "Ég er ekki þýðir þetta að vera snarky, en tóninn
rödd sem þú ert að nota hér virðist meira viðeigandi fyrir áhorfendur ungra barna. "
Það er alveg merkilegt að þú væri í raun segja að miðað við þá staðreynd, að þú hafir fengið
mjög árásargjarn viðhorf og þú hafir fengið mjög stórar ungra barna sem
fylgja þér, ég vildi vita það, vegna þess, að upphæð misnotkun sem ég hef kom undir af a einhver fjöldi
áhorfendur voru börn sjálfir. "Making allir jafn fátækur er ekki framfarir."
"Árið 1936 á Spáni, það var Anarkista félagslega byltingu sem minnst 1,838,000
manns tóku þátt í að setja upp starfsmönnum sjálfsmyndir stjórnenda iðnaðar og landbúnaðar. "
Með öðrum orðum, þínir svokölluðu "anarkistar", sem voru "talið" sósíalisti hófst

Macedonian: 
"Социјализмот не е кул момци!" "Јас не сум што значи тоа да биде snarky, но, тонот
на гласот што го користите овде, се чини посоодветен за публика на малите деца. "
Тоа е сосема извонредна што всушност би рекол дека, со оглед на тоа, имаш
многу агресивен став и имаш многу голем број на следбеници на мали деца кои
ќе го следат, јас ќе знам, зашто, износот на злоупотреба Сум бил под од многу
од вашите гледачи беа самите деца. "Изработка на сите подеднакво сиромашните не е напредок."
"Во 1936 година во Шпанија, имаше анархистички социјална револуција во која најмалку 1.838.000
луѓе учествуваа во поставување на работници само-раководствата на индустријата и земјоделството. "
Со други зборови, вашите т.н. "анархисти", кои беа "наводно" социјалистички почна

iw: 
"סוציאליזם הוא לא מגניב חבר'ה!" "אני לא כלומר זה להיות snarky, אבל, את הטון
קול שאתה משתמש כאן נראה מתאים יותר עבור קהל של ילדים צעירים."
זה די מדהים, כי אתה בעצם אומר כי, בהתחשב בעובדה, יש לך
גישה אגרסיבית מאוד ויש לך קהל מעריצים גדול מאוד של ילדים צעירים
אחריך, הייתי יודע את זה, כי, בסך של התעללות בצעתי באתי תחת מהרבה
של הצופים היו ילדים בעצמם. "הפיכת כולם באופן שווה עני הוא לא התקדמות."
"בשנת 1936 בספרד, חלה מהפכה חברתית האנרכיסטים בה מינימום של 1,838,000
אנשים השתתפו בהקמת עובדים עצמי הנהלות של תעשייה וחקלאות."
במילים אחרות, מה שנקרא "אנרכיסטים" שלך שהיו "כביכול" החלה הסוציאליסטית

Croatian: 
„Socijalizam se ne ohladi momci!” „Ja ne znači da je to snarky, ali ton
glasa koji upotrebljavate ovdje čini prikladnije za publiku male djece.”
To je prilično nevjerojatno da bi se zapravo reći da je, s obzirom na činjenicu, da ste je dobio
vrlo agresivan stav i imaš veliku sljedbu male djece koja
pratiti vas, ja bih znao da je, zbog toga, u iznosu od zlostavljanja sam došao pod s puno
svojim gledateljima sami bili djeca. „Izrada svi jednako siromašni nije napredak.”
„Godine 1936. u Španjolskoj, došlo je do Anarhistički socijalna revolucija u kojoj najmanje 1,838,000
ljudi sudjelovalo u postavljanju radnicima samo-uprava industrije i poljoprivrede.”
Drugim riječima, vaši takozvani „anarhisti”, koji su „navodno” socijalistički počeo

Dutch: 
“Socialisme is niet guys cool!” “Ik ben niet in de betekenis dat dit snarky zijn, maar de toon
van de stem die je hier gebruikt lijkt meer geschikt voor een publiek van jonge kinderen.”
Het is heel opmerkelijk dat je eigenlijk zou zeggen dat, gezien het feit, je hebt
een zeer agressieve houding en je hebt een zeer grote aanhang van jonge kinderen kregen die
volg je, ik zou weten dat, omdat het bedrag van misbruik die ik heb in het kader van een lot ging
van uw kijkers waren kinderen zelf. “Het maken van iedereen even arm is geen vooruitgang.”
“In 1936 in Spanje, was er een Anarchist sociale revolutie, waarbij een minimum van 1.838.000
mensen namen deel aan het opzetten van werknemers self-management van de industrie en de landbouw.”
Met andere woorden, je zogenaamde 'anarchisten', die waren “zogenaamd” socialistische begonnen

English: 
“Socialism isn’t cool guys!” “I’m
not meaning this to be snarky, but, the tone
of voice that you’re using here seems more
appropriate for an audience of young children.”
It is quite remarkable that you would actually
say that, considering the fact, you’ve got
a very aggressive attitude and you’ve got
a very large following of young children who
follow you, I would know that, because, the
amount of abuse I’ve came under from a lot
of your viewers were children themselves.
“Making everyone equally poor is not progress.”
“In 1936 in Spain, there was an Anarchist
social revolution in which a minimum of 1,838,000
people participated in setting up workers
self-managements of industry and agriculture.”
In other words, your so-called ‘anarchists’
who were “supposedly” socialist began

Japanese: 
「「社会主義は！クールな男ではありません」私はこれが不機嫌であることを意味しないんだけど、トーン
あなたがここに使用している音声の幼い子供の観客のためのより適切なようです。」
あなたが実際に、あなたが持っているという事実を考えると、それを言うということは非常に顕著です
あなたが幼い子供の非常に大きな次のことを持っているし、非常に積極的な態度方
虐待の量が、私はたくさんの下に来ました、ので、私は、それを知っているだろう、あなたに従ってください
視聴者の自身の子供たちでした。「誰もが平等に貧しい作ることは進歩ではありません。」
「1936年にスペインで、1838000の最小アナキスト社会革命がありました
人々は、産業と農業の労働者の自己管理を設定するに参加しました。」
言い換えれば、「おそらく」だったあなたのいわゆる「アナキストは、」社会主義が始まりました

Norwegian: 
“Sosialisme er ikke kule gutta!” “Jeg er ikke meningen at dette skal være sarkastiske kommentarer, men tonen
i stemmen som du bruker her synes mer passende for et publikum på små barn.”
Det er ganske oppsiktsvekkende at du faktisk vil si at, vurderer det faktum, har du
en svært aggressiv holdning og du har et veldig stort følge av små barn som
følger deg, jeg ville vite det, fordi mengden av misbruk har jeg kom under fra en rekke
av seerne var barn selv. “Making alle like dårlig er ikke fremgang.”
“I 1936 i Spania, var det en Anarchist sosial revolusjon der minimum 1.838.000
mennesker deltok i å sette opp arbeidere selv Ledelsen i industri og jordbruk.”
Med andre ord, de såkalte 'anarkister' som var “som skal” sosialistisk begynte

Italian: 
“Il socialismo non è cool ragazzi!” “Non sto intenzione questo per essere snarky, ma, il tono
di voce che si sta utilizzando qui sembra più appropriato per un pubblico di bambini.”
E 'abbastanza singolare che si sarebbe in realtà dire che, considerando il fatto, che hai
un atteggiamento molto aggressivo e hai un grande seguito di bambini che
seguirti, vorrei sapere che, a causa, la quantità di abusi che ho è rientrato da un sacco
dei tuoi utenti bambini erano loro stessi. “Rendere tutti allo stesso modo poveri non è il progresso.”
“Nel 1936 in Spagna, c'era una rivoluzione sociale anarchico in cui un minimo di 1.838.000
persone hanno partecipato nella creazione di lavoratori autonomi-management di industria e l'agricoltura “.
In altre parole, i vostri cosiddetti 'anarchici che erano “presumibilmente” socialista ha cominciato

Swedish: 
”Socialism är inte coola killar!” ”Jag är inte betyder att det är snarky, men tonen
av röst som du använder här verkar lämpligare för en publik av unga barn.”
Det är ganska anmärkningsvärt att du faktiskt skulle säga att, med tanke på det faktum att du har
en mycket aggressiv attityd och du har en mycket stor efter unga barn som
följa dig, jag skulle veta att, eftersom mängden missbruk jag kom under från en hel del
dina tittare var barnen själva. ”Att göra alla lika dålig är inte framsteg.”
”Under 1936 i Spanien, det var en anarkist social revolution i vilken minst 1.838.000
personer deltog i att inrätta egen ledningen för industri och jordbruk.”
Med andra ord, dina så kallade anarkister "som var”förment”socialist började

Finnish: 
”Sosialismi ei ole cool kaverit!” ”En merkitys tämän olevan snarky, mutta sävy
ääni, että käytät täällä tuntuu sopivammalta yleisölle pikkulapsille.”
On varsin merkillistä, että te todella sanoa, että kun otetaan huomioon se, sinulla
erittäin aggressiivinen ja sinulla on hyvin suuri seuraavat lapsia, jotka
seuraavat sinua, haluaisin tietää, että koska määrä väärinkäytöstä Olen joutui monilta
teidän katsojat olivat lapset itse. ”Making kaikkia tasapuolisesti köyhä ei ole käynnissä.”
”Vuonna 1936 Espanjassa oli anarkistinen sosiaalisen vallankumouksen, jossa vähintään 1.838.000
ihmistä osallistui perustaa työntekijöiden itsensä johdon teollisuuden ja maatalouden.”
Toisin sanoen, niin kutsuttu "anarkistien, jotka olivat”muka”sosialistinen alkoi

Chinese: 
“社会主义是不冷静的家伙！”“我不是意味着这是表露无疑，但基调
您使用的是这里的声音似乎更适合儿童的观众。”
这是相当了不起的，你会居然说，考虑到一个事实，你有
一个非常积极的态度，你已经有了一个非常大的以下的幼儿谁
跟着你，我也知道这一点，因为，滥用量我从很多来到下
观众是儿童自己。“让每个人都同样贫穷不是进步。”
“在西班牙1936年，有一个无政府主义者的社会革命，成为最小的1838000
人参加了成立工人的工业和农业的自我管理人员“。
换句话说，你的所谓的“无政府主义者”谁是“所谓的”社会主义开始

Polish: 
„Socjalizm nie jest fajne chłopaki!” „Ja nie oznacza, że ​​jest to snarky, ale ton
z głosem, który używasz tutaj wydaje się bardziej odpowiednie dla publiczności małymi dziećmi.”
To dość niezwykłe, że można rzeczywiście powiedzieć, że biorąc pod uwagę fakt, że masz
bardzo agresywną postawę i masz bardzo wielu zwolenników, którzy z małymi dziećmi
za tobą, chciałbym wiedzieć, że ponieważ ilość nadużyć, jakie znalazły się pod z partii
swoich widzów były same dzieci. „Making wszyscy jednakowo biedni nie jest postęp.”
„W 1936 roku w Hiszpanii, nie było Anarchistyczna rewolucja społeczna, w której co najmniej 1,838,000
osób wzięło udział w tworzeniu pracujących na własny zarządy przemysłu i rolnictwa.”
Innymi słowy, „rzekomo” socjalistyczne zaczęły twoi tak zwani „anarchistów”, którzy byli

Chinese: 
“社會主義是不冷靜的傢伙！”“我不是意味著這是表露無疑，但基調
您使用的是這裡的聲音似乎更適合兒童的觀眾。“
這是相當了不起的，你會居然說，考慮到一個事實，你有
一個非常積極的態度，你已經有了一個非常大的以下的幼兒誰
跟著你，我也知道這一點，因為，濫用量我從很多來到下
觀眾是兒童自己。“讓每個人都同樣貧窮不是進步。”
“在西班牙的1936年，有一個無政府主義者的社會革命，成為最小的1838000
人參加了成立工人的工業和農業的自我管理人員“。
換句話說，你的所謂的“無政府主義者”誰是“所謂的”社會主義開始

Hungarian: 
„A szocializmus nem jó fiúk!”, „Én nem azt jelenti, hogy ez snarky, de a hang
A hang, amit használ itt megfelelőbbnek tűnik a közönség a fiatal gyerekek.”
Figyelemre méltó, hogy akkor valóban azt mondják, hogy figyelembe véve azt a tényt, megvan
Nagyon agresszív magatartást, és van egy nagyon nagy követően a fiatal gyermekek, akik
követni, azt tudom, hogy azért, mert az összeg a visszaélés, amit alá került egy csomó
a nézők voltak magukat a gyermekeket. „Legyen mindenki egyformán szegény nem fejlődés.”
„1936-ban Spanyolországban, volt egy anarchista társadalmi forradalom, amelyben minimum 1.838.000
ember vett részt felállítása dolgozók önálló menedzsment az ipar és a mezőgazdaság.”
Más szóval, az úgynevezett „anarchisták”, akik „állítólag” szocialista kezdődött

Vietnamese: 
“Chủ nghĩa xã hội không được làm mát guys!” “Tôi không có nghĩa là điều này là quái gở, nhưng, những giai điệu
của giọng nói mà bạn đang sử dụng ở đây có vẻ thích hợp hơn cho khán giả của trẻ nhỏ.”
Nó là khá đáng chú ý mà bạn thực sự muốn nói rằng, xem xét thực tế, bạn đã có
một thái độ rất hung hăng và bạn đã có một sau rất lớn của trẻ nhỏ
theo bạn, tôi sẽ biết rằng, bởi vì, lượng lạm dụng tôi đã chịu từ rất nhiều
người xem của bạn là con cái mình. “Làm cho tất cả mọi người đều nghèo không phải là tiến bộ.”
“Năm 1936, ở Tây Ban Nha, đã có một cuộc cách mạng xã hội vô chính phủ, trong đó tối thiểu là 1.838.000
người tham gia trong việc thiết lập người lao động tự Managements của ngành công nghiệp và nông nghiệp.”
Nói cách khác, cái gọi là 'vô chính phủ' của bạn những người “được cho là” xã hội chủ nghĩa bắt đầu

Lithuanian: 
"Socializmas yra ne kietas vaikinai!" "Aš nesu reiškia, kad tai snarky, bet toną
balso, kad jūs naudojate čia atrodo labiau tinkama už mažų vaikų auditorijai. "
Tai gana puikus, kad jūs iš tikrųjų pasakyti, kad, atsižvelgiant į tai, jūs turite
labai agresyvus požiūris ir jūs turite labai didelį šių jaunų vaikų, kurie
paskui tave, aš žinau, kad, nes aš piktnaudžiavimo suma jau pagal atėjo iš partijos
savo žiūrovams buvo patys vaikai. "Padaryti visi vienodai prasta nėra pažanga."
"1936 Ispanijoje, ten buvo anarchistų socialinės revoliucijos, kurioje iš 1,838,000 minimalus
žmonių dalyvavo kuriant darbuotojams savęs administracija pramonės ir žemės ūkyje. "
Kitaip tariant, jūsų vadinamieji "anarchistai", kurie buvo "tariamai" socialistinė prasidėjo

Russian: 
«Социализм не круто, ребята!» «Я не означает, что это элегантного, но, тон
голос, который вы используете здесь, кажется, больше подходит для аудитории детей младшего возраста «.
Весьма примечательно, что вы на самом деле сказать, что, принимая во внимание тот факт, у вас есть
очень агрессивное отношение и у вас есть очень много последователей детей младшего возраста, которые
следовать за вами, я бы знал, что, так как количество злоупотреблений я попал под из партии
ваших зрителей были сами дети. «Делать все одинаково бедны не прогресс.»
«В 1936 году в Испании, был анархист социальной революции, в которой как минимум 1,838,000
люди в создании работников самоуправлений промышленности и сельском хозяйства приняло участие «.
Другими словами, ваши так называемые «анархисты», которые были «предположительно» начал социалистическое

Malay (macrolanguage): 
"Sosialisme tidak sejuk guys!" "Saya tidak bermaksud ini menjadi snarky, tetapi, nada
suara yang anda gunakan di sini nampaknya lebih sesuai untuk penonton kanak-kanak. "
Ia agak luar biasa bahawa anda benar-benar akan mengatakan bahawa, jika diambil kira, anda telah mendapat
sikap yang sangat agresif dan anda telah mendapat pengikut yang ramai anak-anak muda yang
menurutmu, tetaplah aku akan tahu bahawa, kerana, jumlah penyalahgunaan saya berada di bawah daripada banyak
penonton anda adalah kanak-kanak itu sendiri. "Membuat semua orang sama-sama miskin tidak dijalankan."
"Pada tahun 1936 di Sepanyol, terdapat revolusi sosial Anarchist di mana sekurang-kurangnya 1.838.000
orang mengambil bahagian dalam menubuhkan bekerja sendiri pengurusan-industri dan pertanian. "
Dalam erti kata lain, apa yang dipanggil 'anarkis' anda yang "kononnya" sosialis bermula

Serbian: 
"Социјализам није цоол момци!" "Не значи да је то Снарки, али тон
гласа који користите овде изгледа више одговара за публику мале деце. "
Сасвим је невероватно да сте ви рекли да је, с обзиром на то, имаш
веома агресиван став и имате веома велики број следбеника мале деце која
пратим те, ја бих знао, јер је количина злоупотреба сам под дошао од многих
ваших гледалаца су сама деца. "Израда сви једнако сиромашни није напредак."
"У 1936. у Шпанији, дошло је до анархиста социјална револуција у којој најмање 1,838,000
људи је учествовало у успостављању радницима самоуправа индустрије и пољопривреде. "
Другим речима, ваши такозвани "анархисти" који су "наводно" социјалистичка почела

Portuguese: 
“O socialismo não é legal guys!” “Eu não estou significando que este seja snarky, mas, o tom
de voz que você está usando aqui parece mais apropriado para um público de crianças “.
É notável que você realmente dizer que, considerando o fato, você tem
uma atitude muito agressiva e você tem um grande seguimento de crianças que
segui-lo, eu sei disso, porque, a quantidade de abusos que eu veio sob a partir de um monte
dos seus visitantes eram as próprias crianças. “Fazer todos igualmente pobres não é progresso.”
“Em 1936, na Espanha, houve uma revolução social anarquista em que um mínimo de 1.838.000
pessoas participaram na criação de trabalhadores auto-administrações da indústria e da agricultura “.
Em outras palavras, os chamados 'anarquistas' que estavam “supostamente” socialista começou

Modern Greek (1453-): 
«Ο σοσιαλισμός δεν είναι δροσερό παιδιά!» «Δεν είμαι που σημαίνει ότι αυτό είναι snarky, αλλά, τον τόνο
της φωνής που χρησιμοποιείτε εδώ φαίνεται να είναι πιο κατάλληλη για ένα ακροατήριο μικρά παιδιά.»
Είναι αξιοσημείωτο ότι θα σας πω πραγματικά ότι, λαμβάνοντας υπόψη το γεγονός, έχετε
μια πολύ επιθετική στάση και έχετε μια πολύ μεγάλη μετά από τα μικρά παιδιά που
ακολουθήσετε, θα ήθελα να γνωρίζετε ότι, επειδή, το ποσό της κατάχρησης Έχω ήρθε κάτω από πολύ
από τις εμφανίσεις σας ήταν ίδια τα παιδιά. «Κάνοντας όλοι εξίσου κακή, δεν είναι πρόοδος.»
«Το 1936 στην Ισπανία, υπήρξε μια αναρχική κοινωνική επανάσταση στην οποία τουλάχιστον 1.838.000
άτομα συμμετείχαν στη δημιουργία εργαζομένων αυτο-διοικήσεις της βιομηχανίας και της γεωργίας.»
Με άλλα λόγια, το λεγόμενο «αναρχικούς» σας, ο οποίος ήταν «δήθεν» σοσιαλιστική ξεκίνησε

Arabic: 
"الاشتراكية ليست باردة الرجال!" "أنا لا يعني هذا أن المتعرج، ولكن، لهجة
الصوت الذي تستخدمه هنا يبدو أكثر ملاءمة لجمهور من الأطفال الصغار ".
ومن اللافت جدا أن كنت أقول في الواقع أنه، بالنظر إلى حقيقة، كنت قد حصلت
موقف عدواني جدا وكنت قد حصلت على اثر كبير جدا من الأطفال الصغار الذين
متابعة لكم، وأود أن أعرف ذلك، لأنه، كمية من تعاطي لقد تعرضت لمن الكثير
من المشاهدين من الأطفال أنفسهم. "جعل الجميع الفقراء على حد سواء ليس التقدم."
"في عام 1936 في إسبانيا، كان هناك ثورة اجتماعية الأناركية التي لا تقل عن 1838000
شارك الناس في وضع العمال إدارات الذاتي للصناعة والزراعة ".
وبعبارة أخرى، "يفترض" بدأت الاشتراكي بك ما يسمى ب "الفوضويين" الذين كانوا

Panjabi: 
"ਸਮਾਜਵਾਦ ਮੁੰਡੇ ਨੂੰ ਠੰਢਾ ਹੈ, ਨਾ!" "ਮੈਨੂੰ ਦਾ ਮਤਲਬ ਹੈ ਨਾ ਰਿਹਾ ਇਸ snarky ਹੋਣਾ ਹੈ, ਪਰ, ਟੋਨ
ਅਵਾਜ਼ ਹੈ, ਜੋ ਕਿ ਤੁਹਾਨੂੰ ਇੱਥੇ ਵਰਤ ਰਹੇ ਹੋ ਦੇ ਨੌਜਵਾਨ ਬੱਚੇ ਦੀ ਹਾਜ਼ਰੀਨ ਲਈ ਹੋਰ ਉਚਿਤ ਲੱਗਦਾ ਹੈ. "
ਇਹ ਕਾਫ਼ੀ ਕਮਾਲ ਦੀ ਹੈ, ਜੋ ਕਿ ਤੁਹਾਨੂੰ ਅਸਲ ਵਿੱਚ ਹੈ, ਜੋ ਕਿ ਕਹਿਣਾ ਸੀ, ਇਸ ਤੱਥ ਦੀ ਵਿਚਾਰ ਹੈ, ਤੁਹਾਨੂੰ ਮਿਲ
ਇੱਕ ਬਹੁਤ ਹੀ ਹਮਲਾਵਰ ਰਵੱਈਏ ਅਤੇ ਤੁਹਾਨੂੰ ਨੌਜਵਾਨ ਬੱਚੇ ਦੇ ਇੱਕ ਬਹੁਤ ਹੀ ਵੱਡੇ ਹੇਠ ਦਿੱਤੀ ਮਿਲ ਜੋ
ਤੁਹਾਨੂੰ ਦੀ ਪਾਲਣਾ, ਮੈਨੂੰ ਪਤਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਸੀ, ਹੈ, ਕਿਉਕਿ ਬਦਸਲੂਕੀ ਦੀ ਮਾਤਰਾ ਨੂੰ ਮੈਨੂੰ ਇੱਕ ਬਹੁਤ ਤੱਕ ਦੇ ਅਧੀਨ ਆਇਆ, ਕੀਤਾ ਹੈ
ਤੁਹਾਡੇ ਦਰਸ਼ਕ ਦੇ ਬੱਚੇ ਆਪਣੇ ਆਪ ਨੂੰ ਸੀ. "ਹਰ ਕੋਈ ਬਰਾਬਰ ਗਰੀਬ ਬਣਾਉਣਾ ਤਰੱਕੀ ਨਹੀ ਹੈ."
"ਸਪੇਨ ਵਿਚ 1936 ਵਿੱਚ, ਅਰਾਜਕਤਾਵਾਦੀ ਸਮਾਜਿਕ ਇਨਕਲਾਬ ਸੀ, ਜਿਸ ਵਿੱਚ 1.838.000 ਦੀ ਇੱਕ ਘੱਟੋ-ਘੱਟ
ਲੋਕ ਵਰਕਰ ਉਦਯੋਗ ਅਤੇ ਖੇਤੀਬਾੜੀ ਦੇ ਸਵੈ-ਪ੍ਰਬੰਧਕ ਸਥਾਪਤ ਕਰਨ ਵਿਚ ਹਿੱਸਾ ਲਿਆ. "
ਹੋਰ ਸ਼ਬਦ ਵਿੱਚ, ਆਪਣੇ ਇਸ ਲਈ-ਕਹਿੰਦੇ 'anarchists' ਕੌਣ ਸਨ, "ਸ਼ਾਇਦ" ਸਮਾਜਵਾਦੀ ਸ਼ੁਰੂ ਕੀਤਾ

Indonesian: 
“Sosialisme tidak keren guys!” “Aku tidak berarti ini menjadi snarky, tapi, nada
suara yang Anda gunakan di sini tampaknya lebih tepat untuk audiens anak-anak.”
Hal ini sangat luar biasa yang Anda benar-benar akan mengatakan bahwa, mengingat fakta, Anda punya
sikap yang sangat agresif dan Anda punya berikut yang sangat besar anak-anak muda yang
mengikuti Anda, saya akan tahu bahwa, karena, jumlah penyalahgunaan aku sudah berada di bawah dari banyak
pemirsa Anda adalah anak-anak sendiri. “Membuat semua orang sama-sama miskin tidak kemajuan.”
“Pada tahun 1936 di Spanyol, ada revolusi sosial Anarkis di mana minimal 1.838.000
orang berpartisipasi dalam mendirikan pekerja mandiri manajemen industri dan pertanian.”
Dengan kata lain, Anda disebut 'anarkis' yang “seharusnya” sosialis mulai

Filipino: 
"Sosyalismo ay hindi cool guys!" "Hindi ko ibig sabihin na ito upang maging snarky, ngunit, ang tono
ng boses na ginagamit mo dito ay tila mas naaangkop para sa isang madla ng mga bata. "
Ito ay lubos na pansin na gusto mo talagang sabihin na, isinasaalang-alang ang katunayan, nakuha mo
isang napaka-agresibo saloobin at nakuha mo na ang isang napaka-malaking mga sumusunod ng mga bata kung sino
sundin mo, nais kong malaman na, dahil, ang halaga ng pang-aabuso ko na dumating sa ilalim mula sa isang pulutong
sa iyong mga taganood ay bata sa kanilang sarili. "Ang pagsasagawa ng lahat ng tao pantay mahihirap ay hindi pag-unlad."
"Noong 1936 sa Espanya, nagkaroon ng isang Anarchist panlipunang rebolusyon kung saan ang isang minimum ng 1,838,000
mga tao na lumahok sa pag-set up manggagawa self-managements ng industriya at agrikultura. "
Sa ibang salita, ang iyong mga tinatawag na 'anarkista' sino ay "supposedly" sosyalista nagsimula

Danish: 
”Socialismen er ikke cool gutter!” ”Jeg er ikke betyder dette at være snarky, men, tonen
i stemmen, at du bruger her forekommer mere hensigtsmæssigt et publikum på små børn.”
Det er ganske bemærkelsesværdigt, at du rent faktisk vil sige, at i betragtning af,, du har fået
en meget aggressiv holdning og du har fået en meget stort følge af små børn, der
følge dig, jeg ville vide, at, fordi mængden af ​​misbrug jeg har kom under fra en masse
af dine seere var børn selv. ”At gøre alle lige fattige er ikke fremskridt.”
”I 1936 i Spanien, var der en anarkist social revolution, hvor et minimum af 1.838.000
mennesker deltog i oprettelsen af ​​arbejdere selv-ledelserne i industri og landbrug.”
Med andre ord, dine såkaldte 'anarkister', der var ”angiveligt” socialistiske begyndte

Spanish: 
“El socialismo no se enfríe chicos!” “No estoy queriendo que esto sea sarcástico, pero, el tono
de la voz que está utilizando aquí parece más apropiado para un público de niños pequeños “.
Es muy notable que usted realmente decir que, teniendo en cuenta el hecho, que tenga
una actitud muy agresiva y que tienes un muy gran número de seguidores de los niños pequeños que
que siga, me gustaría saber que, debido a la cantidad de abusos que he vino bajo de un lote
de los espectadores eran los propios niños. “Hacer a todos por igual pobre no es progreso.”
“En 1936, en España, hubo una revolución social anarquista en la que un mínimo de 1.838.000
personas participaron en la creación de los trabajadores por cuenta gestiones de la industria y la agricultura “.
En otras palabras, “supuestamente” socialista comenzaron sus llamados 'anarquistas' que eran

German: 
„Der Sozialismus ist nicht Jungs cool!“ „Ich bin diese snarky zu sein nicht bedeutet, sondern den Ton an
von Stimme, die Sie hier verwenden scheint für ein Publikum von kleinen Kindern besser geeignet.“
Es ist schon bemerkenswert, dass Sie eigentlich, dass sagen würde, in Anbetracht der Tatsache, du hast
eine sehr aggressive Haltung und Sie eine sehr große Fangemeinde von kleinen Kindern haben, die
folgen Sie, würde ich das wissen, weil ich die Menge des Missbrauchs habe viel unter herkam
Ihre Zuschauer waren sie Kinder. „Making alle gleich arm ist nicht Fortschritt.“
„Im Jahr 1936 in Spanien gab es eine Anarchist soziale Revolution, bei der ein Minimum von 1.838.000
Personen nahmen an Arbeitnehmer Selbstverwaltungen der Industrie und Landwirtschaft aufzubauen.“
Mit anderen Worten: Ihre so genannte ‚Anarchisten‘, die „angeblich“ sozialistischen waren begann

Latin: 
«Socialismo non refrigescant guys!" "Im 'non significantur ut snarky et in sono
de vocis quae erant 'magis videtur hic usus oportet iuvenes ad theatrum sumus filii Dei. "
Bene enim animadvertendum est, quod te aiunt, ut in eo, tu got
feroci animo admodum iuvenes filios habes amplissimum sequentis
sequere tu, ego scio, quia, quantum est ex abusu Ego veni in sortem
tuis nati sunt visores. "De omnibus ex aequo proficere pauper est."
"In MCMXXXVI in Hispaniam, non proclamaverat socialem et turbulentum in quibus minimum erat Anarchist 1.838.000
profecta est populus participatur in managements operarios de industria et aliut agri cultura, sui ipsius ".
In aliis verbis, tua sic dicitur 'anarchists' qui 'uelut "Socialās coeperunt

Korean: 
톤을 나는이 snarky으로 의미 있지 않다 ","사회주의는! 남자를 냉각되지 않는다 "하지만,
여기에 사용하고있는 음성의 어린이의 청중에 더 적합한 것 같다. "
당신이 실제로 당신이있어 사실을 고려, 그런 말 것이 매우 놀라운
당신이 어린 아이들의 매우 큰 다음있어 매우 공격적인 태도 사람
학대의 양이 내가 많이에서 아래 온 적이 있기 때문에 나는 것을 알 것입니다, 당신을 따를
시청자의 아이들에게 자신을이었다. "모든 사람이 동등하게 가난한 만들기가 진행되지 않습니다."
"스페인에서 1936 년, 아나키스트 사회 혁명이 있었다있는 1,838,000의 최소
사람들은 노동자들에게 산업과 농업의 자기 경영진을 설정에 참여했다. "
즉, 있었다 당신의 소위 '아나키스트' "아마도"사회주의는 시작되었다

French: 
« Le socialisme est pas cool les gars! » « Je ne suis pas sens que ce soit sarcastique, mais le ton
de la voix que vous utilisez semble ici plus approprié pour un public de jeunes enfants « .
Il est tout à fait remarquable que vous diriez en fait que, compte tenu du fait, vous avez
une attitude très agressive et vous avez un public très grand nombre de jeunes enfants qui
vous suivre, je sais que, parce que, la quantité d'abus que j'ai venu sous beaucoup de
de vos téléspectateurs étaient eux-mêmes des enfants. « Faire tout le monde aussi pauvres ne sont pas des progrès. »
« En 1936, en Espagne, il y avait une révolution sociale Anarchiste dans laquelle un minimum de 1.838.000
personnes ont participé à la mise en place d'auto-directions de l'industrie et des travailleurs agricoles « .
En d'autres termes, votre soi-disant « anarchistes » qui étaient socialistes « soi-disant » ont commencé

Turkish: 
, Sesi bu snarky olmak anlamına değilim”“Sosyalizm! Adamlar havalı değil”ama
Burada kullandığınız ses küçük çocuklar bir seyirci için daha uygun görünüyor.”
Gerçekte, sahip olduğun gerçeğini göz önünde bulundurarak söyleyebilirim oldukça dikkat çekicidir
Eğer küçük çocuklar çok büyük bir taraftar var ve çok agresif bir tutum kim
kötüye miktarı bir sürü altına girdi ettik çünkü bilemez, seni takip
senin izleyicilerin çocuklara kendilerini edildi. “Herkesin eşit fakir yapma ilerleme değildir.”
“İspanya'da 1936 yılında, bir anarşist toplumsal devrim oldu ki 1,838,000 minimum
insanlar işçilere sanayi ve tarımın kendine yönetimleri kurma katıldı.”
Diğer bir deyişle, vardı senin sözde 'anarşist' “sözde” sosyalist başladı

Ukrainian: 
«Соціалізм не круто, хлопці!» «Я не означає, що це елегантного, але, тон
голос, який ви використовуєте тут, здається, більше підходить для аудиторії дітей молодшого віку «.
Характерно, що ви насправді сказати, що, беручи до уваги той факт, у вас є
дуже агресивне ставлення і у вас є дуже багато послідовників дітей молодшого віку, які
слідувати за вами, я б знав, що, так як кількість зловживань я потрапив під з партії
ваших глядачів були самі діти. «Робити все однаково Бідні не прогрес.»
«У 1936 році в Іспанії, був анархіст соціальної революції, в якій як мінімум 1,838,000
люди в створенні працівників самоврядувань промисловості і сільському господарства взяло участь «.
Іншими словами, ваші так звані «анархісти», які були «імовірно» почав соціалістичне

Hungarian: 
gyakorló kapitalizmus és élő le a gyümölcsöt a kapitalizmus, a természetesen a pénz.
„49 százalék évesek 18-29 pozitív véleménnyel van a szocializmus. Ajjaj!”,„Gyorsabb
Scoob, gyorsabban!”„Soha nem értettem, hogy a fiatal emberek, akik hajlamosak lehetnek ellenes hatóság
hogy az emberek irányítani saját sorsát, békét és harmóniát lenne szocializmus. A központosított
felülről lefelé rendszer, ahol a kormány úgy dönt ...”„A szocializmus nem feltétlenül vonja maga után
hogy.”Te beszélni, hogyan szocializmus nem a központi tervezés, a nagy kérdés az
az érv ez: ha volt megszabadulni, teljesen megszabadulni a magántulajdon
in the economy, how are you then going to
prevent individuals from going and doing their
own thing? In other words, how would you stop
someone like me in society going and starting

Latin: 
viuens et faciunt fructum capitalismi capitalismi et quidem uti pecunia.
"XLIX annorum XVIII sentio de populus ad XXIX habent positivum sententiam socialismi. Horror! "" Citius
Scoob, citius! "" Ego nunquam intellexerunt quomodo iuvenes auctoritate, qui tendunt ad esse anti-
et populus se ipsi moderandi, ut pax et concordia sit pro socialismi. A centralized
in quo summum imperium ratio iudicat ... "" Non necessario sequitur socialismi
Quod ". Et loquor de consilio media fere modo non propriam socialismi, qui exitus sunt valde
argumentum hoc si tollendum omnino carere proprietati
in consilio, ut quid ergo prohibet facere individuorum gradiendum
proprium rei? In aliis verbis, quam vis similem prohibere ad me in societatem, et incipiens

Russian: 
практикуя капитализм и жить за плоды капитализма, с конечно же, используя деньги.
«49 процентов людей в возрасте от 18 до 29 имеют позитивный взгляд на социализм. Хлоп!»«Быстрее
Scoob, быстрее!»«Я никогда не понимал, как молодые люди, которые имеют тенденцию быть анти-власть
пусть люди контролируют свою собственную судьбу, мира и согласия будет за социализм. централизованная
сверху вниз систему, в которой правительство решает ...»«Социализм не обязательно влечет за собой
что.»Вы говорите о том, как социализм не о централизованном планировании, сама проблема с
Ваш аргумент: если бы вы избавиться, полностью избавиться от частной собственности
in the economy, how are you then going to
prevent individuals from going and doing their
own thing? In other words, how would you stop
someone like me in society going and starting

Turkish: 
para kullanarak, kapitalizmi uygulayan ve tabii ile, kapitalizmin meyvelerini kapalı yaşamak.
“18 ila 29 yaş arası kişilerin yüzde 49 sosyalizmin daha olumlu olur. Olmadı!”“Daha hızlı
Scoob, daha hızlı!”“Ben eğilimi gençler karşıtı otorite olmayı hiç anlamadım
insanlar sosyalizm için olacağını kendi kaderlerini, barış ve uyumu kontrol edelim. bir merkezi
Hükümet karar verir nerede mutlaka Sosyalizm gerektirmez”“... sistemini top
söyledi.”Sen sosyalizm merkezi planlama, çok mesele ile ilgili değil nasıl söz
senin argüman şudur: Eğer kurtulmak için olsaydı, tamamen özel mülkiyet kurtulmak
in the economy, how are you then going to
prevent individuals from going and doing their
own thing? In other words, how would you stop
someone like me in society going and starting

Modern Greek (1453-): 
εξάσκηση καπιταλισμού και ζουν από τους καρπούς του καπιταλισμού, με φυσικά, χρησιμοποιώντας τα χρήματα.
«49 τοις εκατό των ατόμων ηλικίας 18 έως 29 έχουν θετική άποψη για το σοσιαλισμό. Yikes!»«Πιο γρήγορα
Σκουμπ, πιο γρήγορα!»«Δεν έχω κατανοήσει πώς οι νέοι άνθρωποι που έχουν την τάση να είναι αντι-εξουσία
αφήσουμε τους ανθρώπους να ελέγχουν τη δική τους μοίρα, την ειρήνη και την αρμονία θα είναι για το σοσιαλισμό. Μια κεντρική
πάνω προς τα κάτω σύστημα όπου η κυβέρνηση αποφασίζει ...»«Ο σοσιαλισμός δεν συνεπάγεται κατ 'ανάγκην
ότι.»Θα μιλήσω για το πώς ο σοσιαλισμός δεν είναι για τον κεντρικό σχεδιασμό, το ίδιο το θέμα με
επιχείρημά σας είναι το εξής: εάν επρόκειτο να ξεφορτωθεί, να απαλλαγούμε εντελώς από την ατομική ιδιοκτησία
in the economy, how are you then going to
prevent individuals from going and doing their
own thing? In other words, how would you stop
someone like me in society going and starting

Spanish: 
practicando el capitalismo y viviendo de los frutos del capitalismo, con por supuesto, el uso de dinero.
“49 por ciento de las personas de entre 18 y 29 tienen una visión positiva del socialismo. Uff!”“Más rápido
Scoob, más rápido!”“Nunca he entendido cómo los jóvenes que tienden a ser anti-autoridad
dejar que la gente a controlar su propio destino, la paz y la armonía sería por el socialismo. A centralizado
de arriba hacia abajo sistema en el que el gobierno decide ...”“El socialismo no implica necesariamente
eso.”Usted habla de cómo el socialismo no se trata de la planificación central, el problema con
su argumento es el siguiente: si tuviera que deshacerse, deshacerse por completo de la propiedad privada
en la economía, entonces ¿cómo se va a evitar que las personas van y haciendo su
propia cosa? En otras palabras, ¿cómo detener a alguien como yo en la sociedad ir y comenzar

English: 
practicing capitalism and living off the fruits
of capitalism, with of course, using money.
“49 percent of people aged 18 to 29 have
a positive view of socialism. Yikes!” “faster
Scoob, faster!” “I’ve never understood
how young people who tend to be anti-authority
let people control their own destiny, peace
and harmony would be for socialism. A centralised
top down system where the government decides…”
“Socialism doesn’t necessarily entail
that.” You speak about how socialism isn’t
about central planning, the very issue with
your argument is this: if you were to get
rid, completely get rid of private ownership
in the economy, how are you then going to
prevent individuals from going and doing their
own thing? In other words, how would you stop
someone like me in society going and starting

Panjabi: 
ਪੂੰਜੀਵਾਦ ਦਾ ਅਭਿਆਸ ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ਕੋਰਸ ਦੇ ਨਾਲ ਪੂੰਜੀਵਾਦ ਦੇ ਫਲ ਨੂੰ ਬੰਦ ਰਹਿ,, ਪੈਸੇ ਨੂੰ ਵਰਤ.
"18 29 ਨੂੰ ਉਮਰ ਦੇ ਲੋਕ 49 ਫੀਸਦੀ ਸਮਾਜਵਾਦ ਬਾਰੇ ਸਹੀ ਨਜ਼ਰੀਆ ਹੈ. ਓਹ! "" ਤੇਜ਼ੀ
Scoob, ਤੇਜ਼ੀ ਨਾਲ! "" ਮੈਨੂੰ ਸਮਝ ਕਦੇ ਕੀਤਾ ਹੈ ਨੂੰ ਨੌਜਵਾਨ, ਜੋ ਲੋਕ ਹੁੰਦੇ ਹਨ ਵਿਰੋਧੀ ਦਾ ਅਧਿਕਾਰ ਹੋਣਾ
ਲੋਕ ਆਪਣੇ ਆਪ ਨੂੰ ਕਿਸਮਤ, ਅਮਨ ਅਤੇ ਸਦਭਾਵਨਾ ਨੂੰ ਕੰਟਰੋਲ ਸਮਾਜਵਾਦ ਲਈ ਹੋਵੇਗਾ ਚਾਹੀਦਾ ਹੈ. ਇੱਕ ਕਦਰੀ
ਸਿਸਟਮ ਚੋਟੀ ਜਿੱਥੇ ਸਰਕਾਰ ਦਾ ਫ਼ੈਸਲਾ ਕਰਦਾ ਹੈ ... "" ਸਮਾਜਵਾਦ ਇਹ ਜ਼ਰੂਰੀ ਸ਼ਾਮਲ ਨਹੀ ਹੈ
ਹੈ, ਜੋ ਕਿ. "ਤੁਹਾਡੇ ਸਮਾਜਵਾਦ ਮੱਧ ਯੋਜਨਾ, ਦੇ ਨਾਲ ਬਹੁਤ ਹੀ ਇਸ ਮੁੱਦੇ ਬਾਰੇ ਨਹੀ ਹੈ ਬਾਰੇ ਗੱਲ
ਆਪਣੇ ਦਲੀਲ ਇਹ ਹੈ ਕਿ: ਜੇ ਤੁਹਾਨੂੰ ਛੁਟਕਾਰੇ ਲਈ ਸੀ, ਪੂਰੀ ਪ੍ਰਾਈਵੇਟ ਮਾਲਕੀ ਦੇ ਛੁਟਕਾਰੇ
in the economy, how are you then going to
prevent individuals from going and doing their
own thing? In other words, how would you stop
someone like me in society going and starting

Polish: 
uprawiania kapitalizm i utrzymujących się z owoców kapitalizmu, z oczywiście, za pomocą pieniędzy.
„49 procent ludzi w wieku od 18 do 29 mają pozytywny pogląd socjalizmu. To jest to!”„Szybciej
Scoob, szybciej!”„Nigdy nie rozumiał, jak młodzi ludzie, którzy wydają się być anty-urząd
niech ludzie kontrolować swoje przeznaczenie, spokój i harmonię byłoby dla socjalizmu. scentralizowane
top down system, w którym rząd zdecyduje ...”„socjalizm nie musi pociągać za sobą
że.”Mówisz o tym, jak socjalizm nie chodzi o centralne planowanie, sam problem z
Twój argument jest tak: jeśli było się pozbyć całkowicie pozbyć się własności prywatnej
in the economy, how are you then going to
prevent individuals from going and doing their
own thing? In other words, how would you stop
someone like me in society going and starting

Macedonian: 
вршење на капитализмот и живее од плодовите на капитализмот, а се разбира, користејќи ги парите.
"49 отсто од луѓето на возраст од 18 до 29 години имаат позитивен поглед на социјализмот. Yikes! "" Побрзо
Scoob, побрзо! "" Никогаш не сум сфати колку млади луѓе кои имаат тенденција да се биде анти-власт
да ја контролираат својата судбина, мир и хармонија, ќе биде за социјализам. централизиран
врвот надолу систем каде што владата одлучи ... "" Социјализмот не мора да се повлекува
тоа. "Ти зборувам за тоа како социјализмот не е за централно планирање, самиот проблем со
вашиот аргумент е ова: ако сте биле за да се ослободи, целосно да се ослободи од приватна сопственост
in the economy, how are you then going to
prevent individuals from going and doing their
own thing? In other words, how would you stop
someone like me in society going and starting

French: 
la pratique du capitalisme et vivant des fruits du capitalisme, avec bien sûr, en utilisant l'argent.
« 49 pour cent des personnes âgées de 18 à 29 ans ont une opinion positive du socialisme. Aïe! » « Plus rapide
Scoob, plus vite! » « Je ne l'ai jamais compris comment les jeunes qui ont tendance à être anti-autorité
laissez les gens à contrôler leur propre destin, la paix et l'harmonie serait pour le socialisme. Une centralisée
haut vers le bas système où le gouvernement décide ... » « Le socialisme ne comporte pas nécessairement
que. » Vous parlez de la façon dont le socialisme est pas la planification centrale, la question même avec
votre argument est le suivant: si vous deviez vous débarrasser complètement se débarrasser de la propriété privée
in the economy, how are you then going to
prevent individuals from going and doing their
own thing? In other words, how would you stop
someone like me in society going and starting

Norwegian: 
praktisere kapitalisme og leve av fruktene av kapitalismen, med selvfølgelig, å bruke penger.
“49 prosent av personer i alderen 18-29 har et positivt syn på sosialismen. Yikes!”“Raskere
Scoob, fortere!”“Jeg har aldri forstått hvordan unge mennesker som pleier å være anti-autoritet
la folk styre sin egen skjebne, fred og harmoni ville være for sosialisme. En sentralisert
top down system der regjeringen bestemmer seg for ...”“Sosialisme betyr ikke nødvendigvis innebære
det.”Du snakker om hvordan sosialismen er ikke om sentral planlegging, selve problemet med
ditt argument er dette: Hvis du skulle bli kvitt, helt bli kvitt privat eierskap
i økonomien, hvordan har du da kommer til å hindre enkeltpersoner fra å gå og gjør sitt
egne ting? Med andre ord, hvordan ville du stoppe en som meg i samfunnet går og starter

Vietnamese: 
thực hành chủ nghĩa tư bản và sống nhờ những thành quả của chủ nghĩa tư bản, với tất nhiên, sử dụng tiền.
“49 phần trăm người trong độ tuổi 18-29 có một cái nhìn tích cực của chủ nghĩa xã hội. Yikes!”“Nhanh hơn
Scoob, nhanh hơn!”“Tôi chưa bao giờ hiểu cách mọi người trẻ, những người có xu hướng chống chính quyền
để cho mọi người kiểm soát số phận riêng, hòa bình và hòa hợp của họ sẽ được cho chủ nghĩa xã hội. Một trung
từ trên xuống hệ thống nơi mà các chính phủ quyết định ...”“Chủ nghĩa xã hội không nhất thiết đòi hỏi
đó.”Bạn nói chuyện về cách chủ nghĩa xã hội không phải là về kế hoạch tập trung, rất vấn đề với
lập luận của bạn là thế này: nếu bạn đã thoát khỏi, hoàn toàn thoát khỏi sở hữu tư nhân
in the economy, how are you then going to
prevent individuals from going and doing their
own thing? In other words, how would you stop
someone like me in society going and starting

Arabic: 
ممارسة الرأسمالية ويعيشون على ثمار الرأسمالية، مع بطبيعة الحال، وذلك باستخدام المال.
"49 في المئة من الناس الذين تتراوح أعمارهم بين 18 إلى 29 لديهم نظرة إيجابية للاشتراكية. ييكيس! "" أسرع
Scoob، أسرع! "" لم يسبق لي ان يفهم كيف أن الشباب الذين يميلون إلى أن تكون مضادة للسلطة
ترك الناس السيطرة على مصيره والسلام والوئام سيكون من أجل الاشتراكية. A مركزية
أعلى إلى أسفل النظام حيث قررت الحكومة ... "" الاشتراكية لا يعني بالضرورة
أن "ومنها يمكنك التحدث حول كيفية الاشتراكية ليست حول التخطيط المركزي، والمسألة بالذات مع
حجتك هي هذه: لو كنت لتخلص، التخلص تماما من ملكية خاصة
في الاقتصاد، كيف حالك ثم الذهاب الى منع الأفراد من الذهاب والقيام بها
الشيء الخاص؟ وبعبارة أخرى، كيف وقف شخص مثلي في المجتمع الذهاب والبدء

Portuguese: 
praticando o capitalismo e viver fora os frutos do capitalismo, com, claro, usando o dinheiro.
“49 por cento das pessoas com idades entre 18 e 29 têm uma visão positiva do socialismo. Caramba!”“Mais rápido
Scoob, mais rápido!”“Eu nunca entendi como os jovens que tendem a ser anti-autoridade
deixar as pessoas controlar seu próprio destino, paz e harmonia seria para o socialismo. A centralizado
de cima para baixo sistema em que o governo decide ...”“O socialismo não implica necessariamente
isso.”Você fala sobre como o socialismo não é sobre o planejamento central, a própria questão com
seu argumento é o seguinte: se você fosse se livrar, se livrar completamente da propriedade privada
in the economy, how are you then going to
prevent individuals from going and doing their
own thing? In other words, how would you stop
someone like me in society going and starting

Chinese: 
練資本主義和生活過資本主義的成果，當然是有，使用金錢。
“的18至29歲的人49％有社會主義的積極看法。哎呀！“”快
Scoob，快！“”我永遠無法理解年輕人誰趨向如何成為反權威
讓人民掌握自己的命運，和平與和諧是社會主義。集中式
自上而下的系統，如果政府決定......“”社會主義未必會造成
那個“你談論社會主義是怎麼不是中央計劃，非常有問題
你的說法是這樣的：如果你出手，徹底擺脫私有製
在經濟上，你怎麼那麼要防止個人去和他們做
自己的東西？換句話說，你將如何阻止我這樣的人在社會中去，並開始

Chinese: 
练资本主义和生活过资本主义的成果，当然是有，使用金钱。
“的18至29岁的人49％有社会主义的积极看法。哎呀！”“快
Scoob，快！”“我永远无法理解年轻人谁趋向如何成为反权威
让人民掌握自己的命运，和平与和谐是社会主义。集中式
自上而下的系统，如果政府决定......”“社会主义未必会造成
那个”你谈论社会主义是怎么不是中央计划，非常有问题
你的说法是这样的：如果你出手，彻底摆脱私有制
在经济上，你怎么那么要防止个人去和他们做
自己的东西？换句话说，你将如何阻止我这样的人在社会中去，并开始

Lithuanian: 
praktikuojančių kapitalizmo ir gyvena ne kapitalizmo vaisius, su, žinoma, naudojant pinigus.
"49 procentų nuo 18, kad 29 žmonės turės teigiamą požiūrį į socializmą. Oi! "Greičiau
Scoob, greičiau! "" Aš niekada suprato, kaip jauni žmonės, kurie linkę būti anti-institucija
tegul žmonės kontroliuoti savo likimą, taiką ir harmoniją būtų už socializmą. centralizuota
iš viršaus į apačią sistemą, kurioje vyriausybė nusprendžia ... "socializmo nebūtinai reiškia
kad. "Jūs kalbate apie tai, kaip socializmas yra ne apie centrinio planavimo, labai problema
Jūsų argumentas yra toks: jei jums buvo atsikratyti, visiškai atsikratyti privačios nuosavybės
in the economy, how are you then going to
prevent individuals from going and doing their
own thing? In other words, how would you stop
someone like me in society going and starting

Indonesian: 
berlatih kapitalisme dan hidup dari buah dari kapitalisme, dengan tentu saja, menggunakan uang.
“49 persen orang berusia 18 sampai 29 memiliki pandangan positif sosialisme. Astaga!”“Lebih cepat
Scoob, lebih cepat!”“Aku tidak pernah mengerti bagaimana orang-orang muda yang cenderung anti-otoritas
membiarkan orang mengendalikan nasib mereka sendiri, damai dan harmonis akan untuk sosialisme. Sebuah terpusat
top down sistem dimana pemerintah memutuskan ...”“Sosialisme tidak selalu berarti
itu.”Kamu berbicara tentang bagaimana sosialisme bukan tentang perencanaan pusat, sangat masalah dengan
argumen Anda adalah ini: jika Anda adalah untuk menyingkirkan, benar-benar menyingkirkan kepemilikan pribadi
in the economy, how are you then going to
prevent individuals from going and doing their
own thing? In other words, how would you stop
someone like me in society going and starting

Danish: 
praktiserende kapitalisme og leve af frugterne af kapitalisme, med selvfølgelig bruge penge.
”49 procent af befolkningen mellem 18 og 29 har et positivt syn på socialismen. Yikes!””Hurtigere
Scoob, hurtigere!””Jeg har aldrig forstået, hvordan unge mennesker, der har tendens til at være anti-autoritet
lade folk kontrollere deres egen skæbne, fred og harmoni ville være for socialisme. En centraliseret
top down-system, hvor regeringen beslutter ...””Socialisme ikke nødvendigvis indebærer
det.”Du taler om, hvordan socialismen handler ikke om central planlægning, den meget problem med
Deres argument er dette: Hvis du skulle slippe helt slippe af med privat ejerskab
in the economy, how are you then going to
prevent individuals from going and doing their
own thing? In other words, how would you stop
someone like me in society going and starting

German: 
Üben Sie die Früchte des Kapitalismus, mit natürlich Kapitalismus und leben von Geld verwendet wird.
„49 Prozent der Menschen im Alter von 18 bis 29 haben eine positive Sicht des Sozialismus. Huch!“„Schneller
Scoob, schneller!“„Ich habe nie verstanden, wie junge Menschen, die dazu neigen, anti-Autorität zu sein
damit die Menschen ihr eigenes Schicksal zu steuern, Frieden und Harmonie würde für den Sozialismus sein. Ein zentralisiertes
Top-down-System, wo die Regierung entscheidet ...“„Sozialismus nicht zwangsläufig mit sich bringen
das.“Sie sprechen darüber, wie der Sozialismus geht es nicht um die zentrale Planung, das sehr Problem mit
Ihr Argument ist: Wenn Sie loswerden waren, vollständig von Privateigentum loszuwerden
in der Wirtschaft, wie wollen Sie dann Menschen daran zu hindern, zu gehen und tun, um ihre
eigenes Ding? Mit anderen Worten, wie würden Sie jemand wie ich in der Gesellschaft aufhören und starten

Ukrainian: 
практикуючи капіталізм і жити за плоди капіталізму, з звичайно ж, використовуючи гроші.
«49 відсотків людей у ​​віці від 18 до 29 мають позитивний погляд на соціалізм. Хлоп! »« Швидше
Scoob, швидше! »« Я ніколи не розумів, як молоді люди, які мають тенденцію бути анти-влада
нехай люди контролюють свою власну долю, миру і злагоди буде за соціалізм. централізована
зверху вниз систему, в якій уряд вирішує ... »« Соціалізм не обов'язково тягне за собою
що. »Ви говорите про те, як соціалізм нема про централізованому плануванні, сама проблема з
Ваш аргумент: якби ви позбутися, повністю позбутися від приватної власності
in the economy, how are you then going to
prevent individuals from going and doing their
own thing? In other words, how would you stop
someone like me in society going and starting

Malay (macrolanguage): 
mengamalkan kapitalisme dan hidup dengan buah-buahan kapitalisme, dengan sudah tentu, menggunakan wang.
"49 peratus daripada mereka yang berumur 18 hingga 29 mempunyai pandangan yang positif terhadap sosialisme. Yikes! "" Lebih cepat
Scoob, lebih cepat! "" Saya tidak pernah memahami bagaimana anak-anak muda yang cenderung untuk menjadi anti-pihak berkuasa
membolehkan orang ramai mengawal nasib mereka sendiri, keamanan dan keharmonian akan bagi sosialisme. A berpusat
atas ke bawah sistem di mana kerajaan memutuskan ... "" Sosialisme tidak semestinya melibatkan
itu. "Anda bercakap tentang bagaimana sosialisme bukan mengenai perancangan pusat, isu yang dengan
hujah anda adalah ini: jika anda adalah untuk menghilangkan, benar-benar menghilangkan pemilikan swasta
dalam ekonomi, bagaimana kamu dapat akan menghalang individu daripada pergi dan melakukan mereka
Perkara sendiri? Dengan kata lain, bagaimana anda akan berhenti seseorang seperti saya dalam masyarakat sendiri dan mula

Serbian: 
вежбање капитализам и живи од плодова капитализма, уз наравно, користећи новац.
"49 одсто људи старости од 18 до 29 има позитивно мишљење о социјализма. Јао! "" Брже
Сцооб, брже! "" Ја сам нисам разумела како млади људи који имају тенденцију да буду против власти
да људи управљају својом судбином, мир и хармонију ће бити за социјализам. centralizovana
топ довн систем у којем влада одлучи ... "" Социјализам не мора нужно да подразумева
да. "Ви говорите о томе како је социјализам не ради о централног планирања, сама емисија са
твој аргумент је ово: ако би се отарасим, потпуно отараси приватног власништва
in the economy, how are you then going to
prevent individuals from going and doing their
own thing? In other words, how would you stop
someone like me in society going and starting

Dutch: 
het beoefenen van het kapitalisme en het leven van de vruchten van het kapitalisme, met natuurlijk ook met geld.
“49 procent van de mensen 18 en 29 jaar heeft een positief beeld van het socialisme. Yikes!”“Sneller
Scoob, sneller!”“Ik heb nooit begrepen hoe jonge mensen die de neiging om anti-autoriteit
laat mensen hun eigen lot, vrede en harmonie zou zijn voor het socialisme. Een gecentraliseerde
top-down systeem waarbij de overheid beslist ...”“Socialisme betekent niet noodzakelijkerwijs
dat.”U spreekt over hoe het socialisme gaat niet over centrale planning, de kwestie met
uw argument is dit: als je om zich te ontdoen, volledig te ontdoen van de particuliere eigendom
in the economy, how are you then going to
prevent individuals from going and doing their
own thing? In other words, how would you stop
someone like me in society going and starting

Filipino: 
pagsasanay kapitalismo at nakatira off ang bunga ng kapitalismo, na may siyempre, gamit ang pera.
"49 porsiyento ng mga tao na edad 18 hanggang 29 Kailangan ng positibong pangmalas sa sosyalismo. Yikes! "" Mas mabilis
Scoob, mas mabilis! "" Hindi ko na naintindihan kung paano kabataan na madalas na maging anti-awtoridad
hayaan ang mga tao kontrolin ang kanilang sariling kapalaran, kapayapaan at pagkakaisa ay magiging para sa sosyalismo. Ang isang sentralisadong
top down na sistema kung saan ang pamahalaan ay nagpapasya ... "" Sosyalismo ay hindi kinakailangang nilalagay
iyon. "Nagsasalita ka tungkol sa kung paano ang sosyalismo ay hindi tungkol sa sentral na pagpaplano, ang napaka isyu sa
ang iyong argumento ay ito: kung ikaw ay upang makakuha ng rid, ganap na mapupuksa ang pribadong pagmamay-ari
in the economy, how are you then going to
prevent individuals from going and doing their
own thing? In other words, how would you stop
someone like me in society going and starting

Korean: 
돈을 사용, 자본주의를 연습 과정으로, 자본주의의 열매를 생활.
"18 ~ 29 세 사람들의 49 %는 사회주의의 긍정적 인 시각을 가지고있다. 아싸! ""빨리
특종, 빨리! ""나는 경향이 젊은 사람들이 반 권위하는 방법을 이해 적이 없어요
사람들이 사회주의 될 자신의 운명, 평화와 조화를 제어 할 수 있습니다. 중앙 집중식
정부가 결정하는 경우 반드시 사회주의을 수반하지 않는다 ""... 시스템을 맨
그. "당신은 사회주의 중앙 계획, 바로 그 문제에 대해없는 방법에 대해 이야기
당신의 주장은 이것이다 : 당신이 없애 있다면, 완전히 사적 소유 제거
경제에, 당신은 어떻게 다음가는 자신의 일에서 개인을 방지하기 위하여려고하고있다
자신의 일? 즉, 당신은 어떻게가는 시작하는 사회에서 나 같은 사람을 중지 할 것

iw: 
תרגול הקפיטליזם לחיות את הפירות של הקפיטליזם, עם כמובן, באמצעות כסף.
"49 אחוזים מהאנשים בגילאי גילאי 18 עד 29 יש דעה חיובית על סוציאליזם. אימא'לה!" "מהר
סקוב, מהר!" "אני אף פעם לא הבנתי איך אנשים צעירים נוטים להיות אנטי-סמכות
לתת לאנשים לשלוט בגורלם, שלווה והרמוניה יהיה לסוציאליזם. מדינה ריכוזית
מלמעלה למטה מערכת שבה הממשלה מחליטה ..." "סוציאליזם אינו בהכרח כרוכה
כי." אתה מדבר על איך סוציאליזם הוא לא על תכנון מרכזי, הנושא מאוד עם
הטענה שלך היא זו: אם היית להיפטר, לגמרי להיפטר בעלות פרטית
במשק, איך הם אז אתה הולך למנוע אנשים מלצאת ולעשות שלהם
הדבר עצמו? במילים אחרות, איך היית לעצור מישהו כמוני בחברה הולך ומתחיל

Icelandic: 
æfa kapítalisma og lifandi burt ávexti kapítalisma, með auðvitað, að nota peninga.
"49 prósent af fólki á aldrinum 18 til 29 hafa jákvæða mynd af sósíalisma. Yikes! "" Hraðar
Scoob, hraðar! "" Ég hef aldrei skilið hvernig ungt fólk sem hafa tilhneigingu til að vera andstæðingur-vald
láta fólk stjórna eigin örlögum þeirra, frið og sátt væri fyrir sósíalisma. miðlæg
top niður kerfi þar sem ríkisstjórnin ákveður ... "" sósíalisma ekki endilega í för með sér
þessi. "Þú talar um hvernig sósíalisminn er ekki um miðstjórn, mjög útgáfu með
rök þín er þessi: Ef þú værir að losna, alveg losna einkaeign
í hagkerfinu, hvernig ert þú að fara þá að koma í veg fyrir að einstaklingar fara og gerðu sitt
eigin hlutur? Með öðrum orðum, hvernig myndir þú hætta að einhver eins og mig í samfélaginu að fara og byrja

Finnish: 
harjoitellaan kapitalismin ja elävät pois hedelmiä kapitalismin kanssa tietenkin käyttää rahaa.
”49 prosenttia vuotiaiden 18-29 on myönteinen käsitys sosialismin. Oho!””Nopeammin
Scoob, nopeammin!””En ole koskaan ymmärtänyt, miten nuoria, jotka ovat yleensä anti-viranomainen
antaa ihmisten hallita omaa kohtaloaan, rauhan ja harmonian olisi sosialismia. keskitetty
ylhäältä alas järjestelmä, jossa valtio päättää ...””Sosialismi ei välttämättä merkitse
että.”Puhut siitä, miten sosialismi ei ole kyse keskitetyn suunnittelun, hyvin ongelma
teidän argumentti on tämä: jos olit päästä eroon, kokonaan eroon yksityisomistuksen
taloudessa, kuinka voit sitten menossa estää yksilöitä menossa ja tekevät
oma juttu? Toisin sanoen, miten lopetat joku kaltaiseni yhteiskunnassa menossa ja alkaa

Croatian: 
prakticiraju kapitalizam i žive od plodova kapitalizma, sa naravno, pomoću novca.
„49 posto ljudi u dobi od 18 do 29 imaju pozitivan stav prema socijalizmu. Joj!”„Brže
Scoob, brže!”„Nikad nisam shvatio kako mladi ljudi koji imaju tendenciju da se protiv vlasti
neka ljudi kontroliraju vlastitu sudbinu, mir i sklad će biti za socijalizam. centralizirani
top-down sustav u kojem vlada odluči ...”„Socijalizam ne mora nužno značiti
da.”Vi govorite o tome kako socijalizam se ne radi o centralnom planiranju, vrlo problem s
tvoj argument je ovaj: ako su dobili osloboditi u potpunosti riješiti privatnom vlasništvu
in the economy, how are you then going to
prevent individuals from going and doing their
own thing? In other words, how would you stop
someone like me in society going and starting

Swedish: 
öva kapitalismen och lever på frukterna av kapitalismen, med naturligtvis använda pengar.
”49 procent av personer i åldern 18 till 29 har en positiv syn på socialism. Usch!””Snabbare
Scoob,””Jag har aldrig förstått snabbare hur unga människor som tenderar att vara anti-myndighet
låta folk kontrollera sitt eget öde, fred och harmoni skulle vara för socialism. En centraliserad
top down system där regeringen beslutar ...””Socialismen inte nödvändigtvis innebär
det.”Du talar om hur socialism handlar inte om central planering, själva problemet med
dina argument är detta: om du skulle bli helt bli av privat ägande
in the economy, how are you then going to
prevent individuals from going and doing their
own thing? In other words, how would you stop
someone like me in society going and starting

Italian: 
praticare il capitalismo e di vivere dei frutti del capitalismo, con ovviamente, usando i soldi.
“49 per cento delle persone di età compresa tra 18-29 hanno una visione positiva del socialismo. Yikes!”“Più veloce
Scoob, più veloce!”“Non ho mai capito come i giovani che tendono ad essere anti-autorità
permettere alle persone di controllare il proprio destino, pace e l'armonia sarebbe per il socialismo. Un centralizzato
top-down sistema in cui il governo decide ...”“Il socialismo non comporta necessariamente
questo “. Lei parla di come il socialismo non si tratta di pianificazione centrale, la stessa questione con
il tuo ragionamento è questo: se si dovesse sbarazzarsi completamente sbarazzarsi della proprietà privata
in the economy, how are you then going to
prevent individuals from going and doing their
own thing? In other words, how would you stop
someone like me in society going and starting

Japanese: 
お金を使って、資本主義を実践し、もちろんで、資本主義の成果をオフに住んでいます。
「18〜29歳の人の49％は、社会主義の肯定的見解を持っています。む〜！」「速いです
Scoob、より速く！」「私は傾向がある若者が反権威であることをどのように理解したことがありません
人々は社会主義のためになる自らの運命、平和と調和を制御できます。集中管理
政府が決定したシステムをトップダウン...」「社会主義は必ずしも伴いません
その。」あなたは社会主義は、中央計画について、非常に問題ではありませんかについて話します
あなたの引数はこれです：あなたが取り除くした場合、完全に私的所有権を取り除きます
in the economy, how are you then going to
prevent individuals from going and doing their
own thing? In other words, how would you stop
someone like me in society going and starting

Dutch: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Swedish: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Arabic: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Spanish: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Norwegian: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Chinese: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Lithuanian: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Japanese: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

German: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Russian: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Panjabi: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Indonesian: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Chinese: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Italian: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

iw: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Danish: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Modern Greek (1453-): 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Korean: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Ukrainian: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Finnish: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Filipino: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Vietnamese: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Latin: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

French: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Croatian: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Serbian: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

English: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Hungarian: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Polish: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Macedonian: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Icelandic: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Turkish: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Malay (macrolanguage): 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

Portuguese: 
up my own private business? And if you were
to attempt to prevent me from doing so, you’re
going against my individual liberty. It’s
my individual liberty to do my own thing if
it's so-called Libertarian. The other point
being is the fact that, you're then going
to need an overseer to ensure that private
ownership is never going to return. If you're
then going to have a group of people oversee
that private ownership is never going to return,
that is the definition to govern, in other
words, that group is the government. Love
the message of liberty and would like to learn
more? Be sure to check out some of my other
videos and don't forget to subscribe. "Well,
it does if you're a Leninist, but, lots of
socialists are against Leninism and oppose
the idea of the state centrally planning the
economy." So, in other words, what you're
basically saying is these socialists hate
socialism *fit of laughter* that's truly fantastic.
"because it recreates the kind of oppression

French: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Norwegian: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Croatian: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Chinese: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Turkish: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Dutch: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Macedonian: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Lithuanian: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Swedish: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Modern Greek (1453-): 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Malay (macrolanguage): 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Danish: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Italian: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Ukrainian: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

German: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Chinese: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Spanish: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

English: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Japanese: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Vietnamese: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Panjabi: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Korean: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Polish: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

iw: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Finnish: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Arabic: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Latin: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Icelandic: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Russian: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Portuguese: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Hungarian: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Filipino: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Serbian: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Indonesian: 
that already exists under capitalism." Capitalism
on the scale is more about the freedom of
the economy from government and to say that
its oppression by agreeing to sign a contract
to work for a company, that alone in itself
is laughable. How can you call it slavery
if there's job interview processes; how can
you call it slavery if you agree to work for
a company; how could you call it slavery when
you have the choice to start up your own private
business; how could you call any of that type
of thing as slavery? "To say that socialism
is just when the state centrally plans the
economy, ignores the fact that there exists
an anarchist faction of the socialist movement
which historically has always been in conflict
with the Leninist factions who want central
planning." Would it really matter even if
there was conflict and differences between
these so-called anarchists who support socialism
to that of those who are complete statists?
You see, there really isn't much of a difference,

Malay (macrolanguage): 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Dutch: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Korean: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Panjabi: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Chinese: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Polish: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Portuguese: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Filipino: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Russian: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Indonesian: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Japanese: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Arabic: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

iw: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Danish: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Norwegian: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Serbian: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Italian: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Ukrainian: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Croatian: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Swedish: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Spanish: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Vietnamese: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Macedonian: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Latin: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

English: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Finnish: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Turkish: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Icelandic: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

French: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Chinese: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

German: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Hungarian: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Lithuanian: 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Modern Greek (1453-): 
because at the end of the day, both of you
are faced with the economic calculation problem.
"For example; during the Spanish revolution,
the communist party attempted to destroy the
collectives that had been created by the anarchists
and also in Soviet Russia, anarchists started
a rebellion in Kronstadt because the institutions
of workers control had been destroyed by the
state and the anarchists felt that this was
a betrayal of socialist principles and naturally
the state did its thing and killed thousands
of people." What you fail to comprehend is
the fact that one of the main goals of socialism
is to create the new man. In other words,
in order for socialism to exist it needs to
create the new man, that's the reason why
you saw between 1921 and '22 Vladimir Lenin
starved more than 5 million people to their
death as an experiment, because socialism
itself requires creating the new man, it does

Modern Greek (1453-): 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Danish: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Malay (macrolanguage): 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Polish: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Serbian: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Lithuanian: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Portuguese: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Vietnamese: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Chinese: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Swedish: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Japanese: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Macedonian: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Croatian: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Norwegian: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Italian: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

French: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

iw: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Korean: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Spanish: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Arabic: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Icelandic: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Indonesian: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

German: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Ukrainian: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Dutch: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Finnish: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Chinese: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Turkish: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Latin: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Filipino: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Panjabi: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Russian: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

English: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

Hungarian: 
not accept humanity for the way we are today,
for who we are as part of human nature. In
other words, part of human nature, we're very
much self-interested individuals, it does
not accept Adam Smith's view of humanity,
this is part of what you fail to comprehend
about socialism and your idea even if it was
this anarcho socialist society, this libertarian
socialism, because what you completely avoid
and completely ignore is the fact, individuals
are all self-interested, such as myself, I
am self-interested and if I ever ended up
in some society, I would aim to create my
own private business, but, you would argue
that you would seek to prevent such a thing
from happening because blah blah blah, it's
theft and it's all this and it's all this,
that and the next thing, it doesn't matter;
the very fact that you wish to prevent another
individual from doing such a thing, pretty
much says that you are against an individuals
liberty. "To blanketly assert that socialism

German: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Swedish: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Chinese: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Serbian: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Croatian: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
Pitanje smjeru stvari, imali su rasprave, imali sukob, ne da
reći da su bili u pravu?

Panjabi: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Malay (macrolanguage): 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Italian: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Polish: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Macedonian: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Chinese: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Vietnamese: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Modern Greek (1453-): 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Portuguese: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

French: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Indonesian: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
isu arah hal-hal, mereka memiliki perdebatan, mereka memiliki konfrontasi, apakah itu
bermaksud mengatakan bahwa mereka benar?

Icelandic: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Lithuanian: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Latin: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Norwegian: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Spanish: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Russian: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Ukrainian: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Korean: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Hungarian: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Danish: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Filipino: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Dutch: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

iw: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

English: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Turkish: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Japanese: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Finnish: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?

Arabic: 
is when the state manages the economy, is
to ignore the fact that historically there
have been huge ideological debates and physical
confrontations between different socialist
factions over this issue." A confrontation
and a debate means nothing, that's meaningless,
I could have a debate over something, you're
currently having this debate over the issue
with Julie Borowski, does that mean to say
that you're correct in what you say? Of course
not, that doesn't mean anything, anybody can
have a debate, anybody can have a confrontation,
the Nazi's had confrontation with the communists;
the Nazi's had, you know, a debate over the
issue of the direction of things, they had
debates, they had confrontation, does that
mean to say that they were right?
