
English: 
There are people who think
the Bible should be taken literally,
that it is inerrant.
Those people haven't even
read the first pages.
Let's just go through the first chapter of
the Bible and talk about all the problems
in it, shall we?
In the beginning God created
the heavens and the earth.
Now the earth was
formless and empty,
darkness was over
the surface of the deep,
and the Spirit of God was
hovering over the waters.
Obviously, we could talk about the Big Bang
and how God didn't just poof us into existence.
But even if you think,
as some Christians do,
that God created everything
at once THROUGH the Big Bang,
none of this
makes sense.
God created
the Heavens?
That's a synonym
for the universe.
So God created the Universe
and Earth at the same time,
in the beginning.
Except the universe is approximately
13.8 billion years old.

Indonesian: 
Ada orang yang berpikir Alkitab harus dipahami secara harfiah,
bahwa itu adalah tanpa salah.
Orang-orang bahkan belum membaca halaman pertama.
Mari kita pergi melalui bab pertama dari Alkitab dan berbicara tentang semua masalah di dalamnya, akan kita?
Pada mulanya Allah menciptakan langit dan bumi.
Sekarang Bumi belum berbentuk dan kosong,
gelap gulita di atas permukaan mendalam,
dan Roh Allah melayang-layang di atas permukaan air.
Jelas, kita bisa berbicara tentang Big Bang dan bagaimana Allah tidak hanya poof kita menjadi ada.
Tetapi bahkan jika Anda berpikir, karena beberapa orang Kristen lakukan,
bahwa Allah menciptakan semuanya sekaligus MELALUI Big Bang,
semua ini masuk akal.
Allah menciptakan langit?
Itu sinonim untuk alam semesta.
Maka Allah menciptakan alam semesta
dan Bumi pada saat yang sama, pada awalnya.
Kecuali alam semesta berusia sekitar 13,8 miliar tahun.

Spanish: 
Hay quienes piensan que la Biblia
debe tomarse literalmente,
que es infalible.
Esa gente ni siquiera ha
leído las primeras páginas.
Pasemos al primer capítulo de la Biblia
y hablemos de todos los problemas allí, 
¿de acuerdo?
Pasemos al primer capítulo de la Biblia
y hablemos de todos los problemas allí, 
¿de acuerdo?
En el principio Dios creó
los cielos y la tierra.
La tierra estaba 
sin orden y vacía,
y las tinieblas cubrían
la superficie del abismo,
y el Espíritu de Dios
se movía sobre las aguas.
Obviamente, podríamos hablar del Big Bang y
cómo Dios no nos hizo existir con un soplo.
Obviamente, podríamos hablar del Big Bang y
cómo Dios no nos hizo existir con un soplo.
Pero aún si creyeras,
como algunos cristianos,
que Dios creó todo de una vez
 a TRAVÉS del Big Bang,
nada de esto
tiene sentido.
¿Dios creó los cielos?
Eso es un sinónimo
del universo.
Entonces Dios creó el Universo
y la Tierra al mismo tiempo,
al principio.
Excepto que el universo tiene
unos 13.8 mil millones de años.

English: 
And the Earth is only
4.5 billion years old.
I mean, if you rewind the tape,
they don't have the same starting point.
And if you know anything
about the early universe,
darkness wasn't
in the picture.
For hundreds of thousands
of years after the Big Bang,
the universe was
really really bright.
And where did this water come
from that God was hovering over?
The Earth didn't have water
until long after it was formed.
It didn't come with
a built-in pool.
The early universe
didn't have rain either.
And God said,
Let there be light,
and there was light.
Who was
He talking to?
There were
no people yet.
God saw that
the light was good,
and he separated
the light from the darkness.
God called
the light day,
and the darkness
he called night.
And there was evening,
and there was morning - the first day.
God hasn't even
made the Sun yet.

Spanish: 
Y la Tierra tiene solo
4.5 mil millones de años.
Si rebobinas la cinta,
no tienen el mismo punto de partida.
Y si conoces algo
del universo primitivo,
la oscuridad no
era parte de él.
Durante cientos de miles de años
después del Big Bang,
el universo era
muy muy brillante.
¿Y de dónde vino el agua sobre
la que Dios estaba flotando?
En la Tierra no hubo agua hasta
mucho después formarse.
En la Tierra no hubo agua hasta
mucho después formarse.
No vino con piscina incorporada.
El universo primitivo
tampoco tenía lluvia.
Y Dios dijo:
"Hágase la luz",
y la luz se hizo.
¿A quién le
estaba hablando?
No habia gente todavía.
Y vio Dios que
la luz era buena,
y separó Dios la luz
de las tinieblas.
Y llamó Dios
a la luz "día"
y a las tinieblas
llamó "noche"..
Y cayó la noche, 
y llegó la mañana: el primer día.
Dios no había hecho
el sol todavía.

Indonesian: 
Dan Bumi ini hanya 4,5 miliar tahun.
Maksudku, jika Anda mundur rekaman itu, mereka tidak memiliki titik awal yang sama.
Dan jika Anda tahu apa-apa tentang alam semesta awal,
kegelapan tidak dalam gambar.
Untuk ratusan ribu tahun setelah Big Bang,
alam semesta benar-benar benar-benar cerah.
Dan di mana air ini berasal dari Allah melayang-layang di atas?
The Earth didn't have water until long after it was formed.
It didn't come with a built-in pool.
The early universe didn't have rain either.
And God said, Let there be light,
and there was light.
Who was He talking to?
There were no people yet.
God saw that the light was good,
and he separated the light from the darkness.
God called the light day,
and the darkness he called night.
And there was evening, and there was morning - the first day.
God hasn't even made the Sun yet.

Spanish: 
Eso no sucede hasta
el versículo 14.
Entonces, ¿de dónde
venía esta luz?
¿Y cómo hay mañana y tarde,
si no hay sol?
Decir eso no tiene sentido
si no hay sol.
Además, la oscuridad no 
es algo aparte; es igual.
La oscuridad es
ausencia de luz.
Tal como el frío
es ausencia de calor.
No son dos cosas diferentes;
son cantidades diferentes
de una misma cosa.
Al parecer, Dios reprobó
ciencias en la primaria.
Y Dios dijo:
"Que exista una bóveda entre las aguas,
que separe aguas de aguas".
E hizo Dios la bóveda
para separar las aguas
de debajo de la bóveda
de las aguas de encima..
Y así fue.
Y llamó Dios
a la bóveda "cielo".
Pasó una tarde,
pasó una mañana:
el día segundo.
¿A Dios le tomó todo un día
para hacer el cielo?
Esta vacio.
¿Qué había que hacer?

English: 
That's not
until verse 14.
So where is this
light coming from?
And how do we get evening
and morning when there's no Sun?
Those words have no meaning
when there's no Sun.
Also, darkness isn't
a separate but equal thing.
Darkness is the
absence of light.
Just like cold is
the absence of heat.
Those aren't
two different things;
they're different
amounts of one thing.
God apparently couldn't pass
a grade school science class.
And God said,
Let there be a vault between the
waters to separate water from water.
So God made the vault
and separated the water
under the vault
from the water above it.
And it was so.
God called the vault sky.
And there was evening,
and there was morning
- the second day.
It... took god a full
day to make the sky?
It's empty.
What was there to make?

Indonesian: 
That's not until verse 14.
So where is this light coming from?
And how do we get evening and morning when there's no Sun?
Those words have no meaning when there's no Sun.
Also, darkness isn't a separate but equal thing.
Darkness is the absence of light.
Just like cold is the absence of heat.
Those aren't two different things;
they're different amounts of one thing.
God apparently couldn't pass a grade school science class.
And God said,
Let there be a vault between the waters to separate water from water.
So God made the vault and separated the water
under the vault from the water above it.
And it was so.
God called the vault sky.
And there was evening,
and there was morning - the second day.
It... took god a full day to make the sky?
It's empty.
What was there to make?

English: 
And how did we get evening and
morning again? There's still no Sun!
But more than all that,
look at the language.
God creates this separation,
this vault, but
it sounds very much like a solid thing,
like a roof over our heads.
But there's no roof.
There's no physical barrier from the rain.
It's the sort of thing you would write
f you didn't understand what gravity was yet.
It also sounds
like a flat roof.
I mean, God separated the
top floor from the bottom floor.
I mean, if the Earth were flat,
this language might make sense. But
-- spoiler -- it's not.
And God said,
Let the water under the
sky be gathered to one place,
and let dry
ground appear.
And it was so.
God called the dry ground land,
and the gathered
waters he called seas.
And God saw
that it was good.
That implies that there was a time
when water covered the entire planet.
And then God mopped it
up into one location.

Spanish: 
¿Y cómo tuvimos tarde y mañana,
otra vez? ¡Aún no hay sol!
Pero más que eso,
observa el lenguaje.
Dios crea esta separación,
esta bóveda, pero
suena como algo sólido,
como un techo sobre nuestras cabezas.
Pero no hay techo.
No hay barrera física contra la lluvia.
Es la clase de cosas que escribirías,
cuando aún no sabes qué es la gravedad.
También suena como
un techo plano.
Dios separó el piso superior
del piso inferior.
Si la Tierra fuera plana, este 
lenguaje tendría sentido. Pero,
(spoiler) no es plana.
Y Dios dijo:
"Que se junten las aguas de debajo
del cielo en un solo sitio,
y aparezca la tierra seca".
Y así fue.
Dios llamó a la
tierra seca "tierra"
y las aguas aglomeradas
las llamó "mares".
Y vio Dios
que era bueno.
Eso da a entender que hubo un tiempo 
en que el agua cubría todo el planeta.
Y Dios la trapeó
hacia un solo lugar.

Indonesian: 
And how did we get evening and morning again? There's still no Sun!
But more than all that, look at the language.
God creates this separation, this vault, but
it sounds very much like a solid thing, like a roof over our heads.
But there's no roof. There's no physical barrier from the rain.
It's the sort of thing you would write f you didn't understand what gravity was yet.
It also sounds like a flat roof.
I mean, God separated the top floor from the bottom floor.
I mean, if the Earth were flat, this language might make sense. But
-- spoiler -- it's not.
And God said,
Let the water under the sky be gathered to one place,
and let dry ground appear.
And it was so.
God called the dry ground land,
and the gathered waters he called seas.
And God saw that it was good.
That implies that there was a time when water covered the entire planet.
And then God mopped it up into one location.

Spanish: 
Pero nuestro planeta nunca
fue totalmente agua.
Hubo un tiempo en
que no tenía agua.
Así que nunca hubo
agua para aglomerar.
Entonces Dios dijo:
"Verdee la tierra hierba verde:
que engendre semilla y árboles 
frutales que den fruto con semilla
según su especie".
Y así fue.
De la tierra brotó
hierba verde
que engendraba semilla
según su especie,
y árboles que daban fruto, y
llevaban semilla según su especie.
Y vio Dios
que era bueno.
Pasó una tarde, 
pasó una mañana:
el día tercero.
De nuevo,
tarde/mañana/sin sol.
No tiene sentido.
Pero, ¿cómo tienes plantas que
dan frutos, y vegetación,
si no puedes tener
fotosíntesis
porque, repito,
no hay sol?
¿Y cómo es que la tierra tiene 
que producir todo esto ahora?
¡Vaya Dios de
la Creación!
Es como si la biblia dijera:
Él creó la tierra, y entonces pensó:

English: 
But our planet was
never entirely water.
There was a time
when it had no water.
So there was never
any water to gather.
Then God said,
Let the land produce vegetation:
seed-bearing plants and trees
on the land that bear fruit
with seed in it,
according to their
various kinds.
And it was so.
The land produced
vegetation:
plants bearing seed
according to their kinds
and trees bearing fruit with
seed in it according to their kinds.
And God saw
that it was good.
And there was evening,
and there was morning
- the third day.
Again, evening/morning/no Sun.
Doesn't make sense.
But how do you make plants
that bear fruit and vegetation
when you can't
have photosynthesis
because, again,
there's no Sun?
And how come the land has
to produce all this stuff now?
So much for the
God of Creation!
It's like the Bible says:
He created land, then thought,

Indonesian: 
But our planet was never entirely water.
There was a time when it had no water.
So there was never any water to gather.
Then God said, Let the land produce vegetation:
seed-bearing plants and trees on the land that bear fruit with seed in it,
according to their various kinds.
And it was so.
The land produced vegetation:
plants bearing seed according to their kinds
and trees bearing fruit with seed in it according to their kinds.
And God saw that it was good.
And there was evening, and there was morning
- the third day.
Again, evening/morning/no Sun.
Doesn't make sense.
But how do you make plants that bear fruit and vegetation
when you can't have photosynthesis
because, again, there's no Sun?
And how come the land has to produce all this stuff now?
So much for the God of Creation!
It's like the Bible says: He created land, then thought,

Spanish: 
"Muy bien, ya terminé.
Hagan lo que falta".
Además, según esto, los primeros seres vivos
en el universo fueron plantas y árboles,
todo por encima del suelo
Eso no es cierto.
Las primeras formas de vida
fueron enteramente marinas.
Y eran organismos
unicelulares,
no plantas complejas con órganos sexuales
capaces de producir semillas.
Y Dios dijo:
"Que existan lumbreras en la bóveda del
cielo para separar el día de la noche,
para señalar las fiestas,
los días y los años,
y sirvan de lumbreras en la bóveda
del cielo para alumbrar a la tierra"
Y así fue.
Dios hizo dos
grandes lumbreras:
la mayor para
gobernar el día,
y la menor para
gobernar la noche.
También hizo las estrellas.
Dios las puso en la bóveda celeste
para alumbrar la tierra,
para gobernar el
día y la noche,
y para separar la luz
de la oscuridad.
Y vio Dios
que era bueno.

English: 
"okay, I'm done now.
They can do the rest
of the work."
Also, by this account, the first
living things in the universe are plants
and trees, which are above ground.
That's not true.
The first forms of life
were entirely in the sea.
And they were
single-celled organisms,
not complex plants with the sort of
sex organs that would allow them
to produce seeds.
And God said,
Let there be lights in the vault
of the sky to separate the day
from the night,
and let them serve as signs
to mark sacred times,
and days and years,
and let them be lights in the vault
of the sky to give light on the earth.
And it was so.
God made two
great lights:
the greater light
to govern the day
and the lesser light
to govern the night.
He also made
the stars.
God set them in the vault of
the sky to give light on the earth,
to govern the day
and the night,
and to separate
light from darkness.
And God saw
that it was good.

Indonesian: 
"okay, I'm done now.
They can do the rest of the work."
Also, by this account, the first living things in the universe are plants and trees, which are above ground.
That's not true.
The first forms of life were entirely in the sea.
And they were single-celled organisms,
not complex plants with the sort of sex organs that would allow them to produce seeds.
And God said,
Let there be lights in the vault of the sky to separate the day from the night,
and let them serve as signs to mark sacred times,
and days and years,
and let them be lights in the vault of the sky to give light on the earth.
And it was so.
God made two great lights:
the greater light to govern the day
and the lesser light to govern the night.
He also made the stars.
God set them in the vault of the sky to give light on the earth,
to govern the day and the night,
and to separate light from darkness.
And God saw that it was good.

Spanish: 
¡Por fin!
¡Tenemos el sol!
¡Y la luna!
Pero, un momento...
La luna es descrita como
una "lumbrera menor".
Y si algo sabemos
de la luna,
es que no emite luz.
Ella refleja
la luz del sol.
¿De qué está
hablando la Biblia?
Y eso de que la
"lumbrera mayor", el sol,
gobierna el día mientras
la luna gobierna la noche,
tampoco tiene sentido.
Porque no es que el Sol
se esconde de noche.
Eso lo creen los
niños pequeños.
Y aunque no podamos
ver el sol,
sigue allí.
Cuando es de noche para nosotros ,
es de día para otros.
No hay una separación real
entre el día y la noche.
Siempre hace sol
en alguna parte.
Además, si Dios hizo
estas dos lumbreras,
¿a dónde va la que
está fuera de servicio?
Dios nunca lo dice.
Además, el sol y la luna no
fueron creados al mismo tiempo.
El sol es muy viejo.
La luna no.

English: 
Finally!
We get the Sun!
And the moon!
But wait.
The moon is described
as a "lesser light."
And if you know
anything about the moon,
it's that it doesn't
give off light.
It reflects light
from the Sun.
So what is the Bible
talking about?
And the idea that the
"Greater light" -- the Sun --
governs the day while
the moon governs the night
doesn't make
sense either.
It's not like the Sun
goes away at night.
That's what
toddlers think.
And even though we might
not be able to see the Sun,
it is still there.
When it's nighttime for us,
it's daytime for someone else.
So there's no real separation
between the night and day.
It's always
sunny somewhere.
Also, if God made
these two lights,
where does one go
when it's off duty?
God never tells us.
Also, the Sun and the moon
were not created at the same time.
The Sun is really old.
The moon is not.

Indonesian: 
Finally!
We get the Sun!
And the moon!
But wait.
The moon is described as a "lesser light."
And if you know anything about the moon,
it's that it doesn't give off light.
It reflects light from the Sun.
So what is the Bible talking about?
And the idea that the "Greater light" -- the Sun --
governs the day while the moon governs the night
doesn't make sense either.
It's not like the Sun goes away at night.
That's what toddlers think.
And even though we might not be able to see the Sun,
it is still there.
When it's nighttime for us, it's daytime for someone else.
So there's no real separation between the night and day.
It's always sunny somewhere.
Also, if God made these two lights,
where does one go when it's off duty?
God never tells us.
Also, the Sun and the moon were not created at the same time.
The Sun is really old. The moon is not.

Spanish: 
La luna no apareció hasta mil millones 
de años después de formarse la Tierra,
y la Tierra se formó mucho
después de la llegada del Sol.
Y supuestamente, Dios hizo estas dos lumbreras
para separar la luz de la oscuridad.
Pero Dios también hizo eso
en el versículo 4...
¿Separó la luz de la
oscuridad dos veces?
¿Un Dios que todo lo sabe
sufre de amnesia?
También dice que Dios puso las lumbreras
en la "bóveda del cielo".
Pero el sol no está
en nuestro cielo.
No está en la atmósfera
de la Tierra.
Recuerda, nosotros giramos
alrededor del sol,
no al revés.
Esos versículos también dicen
que Dios hizo las estrellas.
Pero piensa en esto.
Dios hizo nuestro sol.
Dios hizo la luna
de la Tierra.
¿Y entonces creó
todas las estrellas?
¿Sabes cuántas estrellas hay?
Sé que la gente bromea sobre la frase de 
Carl Sagan: "miles y miles de millones"
- él nunca dijo esa frase -
pero realmente hay miles y miles
de millones de estrellas.

English: 
The moon didn't appear until
a billion years after the Earth
was formed,
and the Earth formed
long after the Sun arrived.
And God supposedly made these two
lights to separate light from darkness.
But God also did that
back in verse 4...
so did he just separate
light from darkness twice?
Did an all-knowing God
get amnesia?
It also says God set the lights
in the "vault of the sky."
But the Sun
is not in our sky.
It's not in the
Earth's atmosphere.
Remember, we revolve
around the Sun,
not the other
way around.
Those verses also
say God made the stars.
But think about that.
God made our Sun.
God made the
Earth's moon.
And then God created
all the stars?
Do you know how many
stars there are?
I know people joke about how
Carl Sagan said "billions and billions"
-- he never actually
said that phrase --
but there are really
billions and billions of stars.

Indonesian: 
The moon didn't appear until a billion years after the Earth was formed,
and the Earth formed long after the Sun arrived.
And God supposedly made these two lights to separate light from darkness.
But God also did that back in verse 4...
so did he just separate light from darkness twice?
Did an all-knowing God get amnesia?
It also says God set the lights in the "vault of the sky."
But the Sun is not in our sky.
It's not in the Earth's atmosphere.
Remember, we revolve around the Sun,
not the other way around.
Those verses also say God made the stars.
But think about that.
God made our Sun.
God made the Earth's moon.
And then God created all the stars?
Do you know how many stars there are?
I know people joke about how Carl Sagan said "billions and billions"
-- he never actually said that phrase --
but there are really billions and billions of stars.

English: 
So God made the Greater light,
and the Lesser Light,
and then, like
an afterthought,
made several billions
of something else.
And the Bible just glosses over
all that in a single sentence.
And by the way,
the Sun is a star!
Saying you're
creating the Sun,
then the stars,
that's like saying you're gonna
go shopping for some Lucky Charms,
but then you might have to
make another trip to buy some cereal.
Like... you did that already.
And if God made the stars
to give light on the Earth,
how come we can't see
all those stars?
At best, if you're
in certain parts of the world
and you get to witness
a truly starry sky,
you're not seeing
all the stars.
You're not seeing
billions and billions of stars.
They definitely are not
lighting the Earth.
And why are these
stars giving light on Earth?
I thought God already said
"Let there be Light."
And I thought God already separated
the light from the darkness.
But now he's making light again?

Indonesian: 
So God made the Greater light, and the Lesser Light,
and then, like an afterthought,
made several billions of something else.
And the Bible just glosses over all that in a single sentence.
And by the way, the Sun is a star!
Saying you're creating the Sun,
then the stars,
that's like saying you're gonna go shopping for some Lucky Charms,
but then you might have to make another trip to buy some cereal.
Like... you did that already.
And if God made the stars to give light on the Earth,
how come we can't see all those stars?
At best, if you're in certain parts of the world
and you get to witness a truly starry sky,
you're not seeing all the stars.
You're not seeing billions and billions of stars.
They definitely are not lighting the Earth.
And why are these stars giving light on Earth?
I thought God already said "Let there be Light."
And I thought God already separated the light from the darkness. But now he's making light again?

Spanish: 
Entonces Dios hizo la Lumbrera Mayor,
y la Lumbrera Menor,
y luego, de último minuto,
hizo varios miles de millones
de otra cosa.
Y la Biblia pasa esto por alto
en una sola oración.
Y por cierto,
¡el Sol es una estrella!
Decir que
creaste el sol,
y luego las estrellas,
es como decir que vas
a comprar Zucaritas,
pero tal vez tengas que
regresar a comprar cereal.
Es como... Ya lo hiciste.
Y si Dios hizo las estrellas
para alumbrar la Tierra,
¿por qué no podemos ver
todas esas estrellas?
Con suerte, si estás en
cierta parte del mundo
y puedes presenciar un cielo
bastante estrellado,
no vas a ver todas
las estrellas.
No ves miles y miles
de millones de estrellas.
Y definitivamente, no están
iluminando la Tierra.
¿Y para qué están
iluminando la Tierra?
Pensé que Dios había dicho:
"Hágase la luz".
Y pensé que Dios ya había separado
la luz de la oscuridad. 
¿Y está creando luz de nuevo?

Indonesian: 
Like, dude, get it right the first time. You're God!
And I thought God already created the Heavens in the first sentence of Genesis.
If stars weren't a part of that,
then what exactly was in those Heavens?
If you left out the biggest ingredient in a recipe, you don't get credit for making the thing.
It's also a bit ironic that God created signs in the sky,
because that's something astrologers believe,
and plenty of Christians say astrologers are blasphemous.
If you're putting your trust in an astrologer, you're not putting your trust in God, and that's supposedly bad!
And there was evening, and there was morning
- the fourth day.
Well, at least we have a Sun now.
It took four days to get the actual first day.
And God said, Let the water teem with living creatures,
and let birds fly above the earth across the vault of the sky.
So God created the great creatures of the sea
and every living thing with which the water teems
and that moves about in it, according to their kinds,

Spanish: 
Oye, amigo, hazlo bien desde
la primera vez. ¡Eres Dios!
Y yo creía que Dios había creado los cielos
en la primera frase del Génesis.
Si las estrellas no
eran parte de eso,
¿qué había exactamente
en esos cielos?
Si dejas fuera el ingrediente principal
en una receta, no te ganas el crédito 
de haberla preparado.
También es algo irónico que Dios
creara señales en el cielo,
porque en eso
creen los astrólogos,
y muchos cristianos dicen que
los astrólogos son blasfemos.
Si confías en un astrólogo,
no confías en Dios, 
¡y eso supuestamente es malo!
Si confías en un astrólogo,
no confías en Dios, 
¡y eso supuestamente es malo!
Pasó una tarde, 
pasó una mañana:
el día cuarto.
Bueno, al menos ya
tenemos un sol.
Pasaron cuatro días para al fin
tener un verdadero primer día.
Y Dios dijo: "Bullan las aguas
con un bullir de vivientes,
y vuelen pájaros sobre la tierra
frente a la bóveda del cielo".
Y creó Dios los cetáceos
y los vivientes que se deslizan
y que el agua hizo bullir 
según sus especies,

English: 
Like, dude, get it right
the first time. You're God!
And I thought God already created
the Heavens in the first sentence
of Genesis.
If stars weren't
a part of that,
then what exactly
was in those Heavens?
If you left out the biggest ingredient
in a recipe, you don't get credit
for making the thing.
It's also a bit ironic that
God created signs in the sky,
because that's something
astrologers believe,
and plenty of Christians
say astrologers are blasphemous.
If you're putting your trust in an astrologer,
you're not putting your trust in God,
and that's supposedly bad!
And there was evening,
and there was morning
- the fourth day.
Well, at least
we have a Sun now.
It took four days to get
the actual first day.
And God said, Let the
water teem with living creatures,
and let birds fly above the
earth across the vault of the sky.
So God created the great
creatures of the sea
and every living thing
with which the water teems
and that moves about in it,
according to their kinds,

Spanish: 
y las aves aladas,
según su especie.
Y Dios vio que era bueno.
Y Dios los bendijo,
diciendo:
"Crezcan, multiplíquense,
llenen las aguas del mar;
que las aves se multipliquen
en la tierra".
Y cayó la noche,
y llegó la mañana.
Ese fue el
quinto día.
Repito, Dios ni siquiera
hizo esas criaturas.
Dejó que el agua
lo hiciera.
¿Qué tan flojo es?
Pero si observas
esa línea de tiempo,
Dios hizo criaturas vivientes
después de hacer las plantas.
Eso no es correcto. No es lo que 
muestran los registros fósiles.
U otra evidencia cualquiera.
Es al revés.
Y Dios dijo:
“Produzca la tierra seres
vivientes según su género:
bestias, y reptiles,
y animales de la tierra
según su género".
Y así fue.
Dios hizo a los animales salvajes
de acuerdo a su especie,
el ganado según su especie, y todas
las criaturas que se mueven por el suelo
según su especie.
el ganado según su especie, y todas
las criaturas que se mueven por el suelo
según su especie.

English: 
and every winged bird,
according to its kind.
And God saw that
it was good.
God blessed
them and said,
Be fruitful and increase in number
and fill the water in the seas,
and let the birds
increase on the earth.
And there was evening,
and there was morning
- the fifth day.
Again, God didn't even
make those creatures.
He let the
water do it.
How lazy can you be?
But if you look
at this timeline,
God made living creatures
after he made plants.
That's not right. That's not
what the fossil record shows.
Or any other piece of evidence.
It's the other way around.
And God said,
Let the land produce living
creatures according to their kinds:
the livestock, the creatures
that move along the ground,
and the wild animals,
each according to its kind.
And it was so.
God made the wild animals
according to their kinds,
the livestock according to their kinds,
and all the creatures that move along
the ground according to their kinds.

Indonesian: 
and every winged bird, according to its kind.
And God saw that it was good.
God blessed them and said,
Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the water in the seas,
and let the birds increase on the earth.
And there was evening, and there was morning
- the fifth day.
Again, God didn't even make those creatures.
He let the water do it.
How lazy can you be?
But if you look at this timeline,
God made living creatures after he made plants.
That's not right. That's not what the fossil record shows.
Or any other piece of evidence. It's the other way around.
And God said,
Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds:
the livestock, the creatures that move along the ground,
and the wild animals, each according to its kind.
And it was so.
God made the wild animals according to their kinds,
the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds.

Indonesian: 
And God saw that it was good.
God didn't make these creatures either.
He let the land do it.
Lazy! But if we're talking about creatures that move along the ground
-- insects, reptiles, things like that --
they were around for hundreds of millions of years before
those other wild animals.
And they all originated in the sea,
not the land.
Also, livestock?
We domesticated cattle. They never lived in the wild.
Then God said, Let us make mankind in our image,
in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky,
over the livestock and all the wild animals,
and over all the creatures that move along the ground.
Let "US" make mankind...? Who's us?
Who else is hanging out with God doing all this?
Are there other Gods He's not telling us about?
And how do we get to rule over these other creatures, when,
if you accept science, the fish and the birds and the wild animals

English: 
And God saw that
it was good.
God didn't make
these creatures either.
He let the
land do it.
Lazy! But if we're talking about
creatures that move along the ground
-- insects, reptiles, things like that --
they were around for hundreds
of millions of years before
those other wild animals.
And they all originated
in the sea,
not the land.
Also, livestock?
We domesticated cattle.
They never lived in the wild.
Then God said, Let us
make mankind in our image,
in our likeness, so that they may rule
over the fish in the sea and the birds
in the sky,
over the livestock and
all the wild animals,
and over all the creatures
that move along the ground.
Let "US" make mankind...?
Who's us?
Who else is hanging out
with God doing all this?
Are there other Gods
He's not telling us about?
And how do we get to rule
over these other creatures, when,
if you accept science, the fish
and the birds and the wild animals

Spanish: 
Y Dios vio
que era bueno.
Dios tampoco hizo
estas criaturas.
Dejó que la tierra
los hiciera.
¡Perezoso!
Pero si hablamos de criaturas
que se mueven por el suelo
- insectos, reptiles, cosas así -
esos ya estaban allí hace cientos
de millones de años antes de
los otros animales salvajes.
Y todos se originaron
en el mar;
no en la tierra.
Además, ¿el ganado?
Nosotros domesticamos el ganado.
Nunca vivieron en la naturaleza.
Entonces Dios dijo: "Hagamos
al hombre a nuestra imagen,
conforme a nuestra semejanza; y 
señoree sobre los peces del mar,
sobre las aves de los cielos,
conforme a nuestra semejanza; y 
señoree sobre los peces del mar,
sobre las aves de los cielos,
sobre las bestias,
sobre toda la tierra,
y sobre todo reptil que se
arrastra sobre la tierra".
¿"HAGAMOS" al hombre...?
¿Hagamos... quiénes?
¿Quién más está con Dios
haciendo esto?
¿Hay otros dioses de
los que no nos habla?
¿Y cómo podemos señorearnos sobre
estas otras criaturas cuando,
si aceptas la ciencia, los peces,
aves, y animales salvajes

English: 
were around for millions of years
before humans ever entered the scene?
It's a very cocky
thing to say,
"you know all these creatures
that have been around for millions of years?
I rule them now.
I've been around for like one day."
It's like Christopher
Columbus saying,
"I discovered this land...
that these native people have
been living on for generations."
As a vegetarian, this verse is also terrifying
because it's been used as justification
for why we can
slaughter animals, and shoot birds,
and just be cruel in general,
because God said
we rule over everything.
Who cares about
climate change?
The Earth doesn't rule us.
We rule it!
So God created mankind
in his own image,
in the image of God
he created them;
male and female
he created them.
I know this verse has been used by
conservative Christians to reject evolution.
God created us as is,
therefore
even the thought
of evolution is blasphemy.
And yet all the
evidence ever found,

Indonesian: 
were around for millions of years before humans ever entered the scene?
It's a very cocky thing to say,
"you know all these creatures that have been around for millions of years?
I rule them now. I've been around for like one day."
It's like Christopher Columbus saying,
"I discovered this land...
that these native people have been living on for generations."
As a vegetarian, this verse is also terrifying because it's been used as justification for why we can
slaughter animals, and shoot birds, and just be cruel in general,
because God said we rule over everything.
Who cares about climate change?
The Earth doesn't rule us. We rule it!
So God created mankind in his own image,
in the image of God he created them;
male and female he created them.
I know this verse has been used by conservative Christians to reject evolution.
God created us as is, therefore
even the thought of evolution is blasphemy.
And yet all the evidence ever found,

Spanish: 
existieron hace millones de años antes
de que los humanos entraran en escena?
Sonaría muy
arrogante decir:
"¿Ves todas estas criaturas que han
existido durante millones de años?
Soy su rey ahora.
He estado aquí como por un día".
Es como que
Cristóbal Colón diga:
"Yo descubrí esta tierra...
Donde estos nativos han
vivido por generaciones".
Como vegetariano, este versículo también 
resulta aterrador, porque se ha usado 
como justificación para
sacrificar animales, dispararle a pájaros,
y ser cruel en general,
porque Dios dijo que
reinaríamos sobre todo.
¿A quién le importa
el cambio climático?
La tierra no nos gobierna.
¡Nosotros la gobernamos!
Y creó Dios al hombre
a su imagen,
a imagen de Dios lo creó;
varón y hembra los creó.
Sé que hay cristianos conservadores 
que han utilizado este versículo 
para rechazar la evolución.
Que Dios nos creó tal como somos.
Y por eso,
incluso el pensar en la
evolución es blasfemia.
Sin embargo, toda la
evidencia encontrada,

Spanish: 
toda, dice que no 
entramos así a escena.
Esa frase también se usa para justificar
el horrible tratamiento a las personas 
transgénero.
Esa frase también se usa para justificar
el horrible tratamiento a las personas 
transgénero.
Dicen que los trans ni siquiera
existen porque Dios creó lo binario.
Pero en aras
de la discusión,
si Dios creó al hombre
a su imagen,
y resultaron
hombres y mujeres,
¿qué dice eso de Dios?
¿Dios es ambas cosas?
Y también parece que Dios creó a
hombres y mujeres al mismo tiempo.
Y también parece que Dios creó a
hombres y mujeres al mismo tiempo.
Pero más tarde, literalmente
un capítulo después,
nos enteramos de que Eva fue
creada de la costilla de Adán.
Él llegó primero, 
ella después.
Entonces, ¿cómo fue?
Dios los bendijo
y les dijo:
“Fructificad y multiplicaos,
y llenad la tierra
y sojuzgadla,
y señoread sobre
los peces del mar,
sobre las aves del cielo,
y sobre todas las bestias que
se mueven sobre la tierra".
Pedirle a dos personas que
pueblen la Tierra es injusto.
Pone una carga inhumana 
sobre la mujer,

Indonesian: 
ever, says we did not just arrive on the scene like this.
That line is also used to justify their awful treatment of transgender people.
They say trans people don't even exist because God created this binary.
But just for the sake of argument,
if God created mankind in His own image,
and they came out male and female,
what does that say about God?
Is God somehow both?
And it also sounds like God created male and female at the same time.
Yet later on, literally a chapter later,
we learn Eve was created from Adam's rib.
He came first, then her.
Which is it?
God blessed them and said to them,
Be fruitful and increase in number;
fill the earth and subdue it.
Rule over the fish in the sea
and the birds in the sky
and over every living creature that moves on the ground.
Telling two people to fill the Earth is just wildly uncalled for.
It really places an inhuman burden on the woman

English: 
ever, says we did not just
arrive on the scene like this.
That line is also used to justify their
awful treatment of transgender people.
They say trans people don't even
exist because God created this binary.
But just for
the sake of argument,
if God created mankind
in His own image,
and they came out
male and female,
what does that
say about God?
Is God somehow both?
And it also sounds like God created
male and female at the same time.
Yet later on,
literally a chapter later,
we learn Eve was
created from Adam's rib.
He came first,
then her.
Which is it?
God blessed them
and said to them,
Be fruitful and
increase in number;
fill the earth
and subdue it.
Rule over the
fish in the sea
and the birds
in the sky
and over every living creature
that moves on the ground.
Telling two people to fill the
Earth is just wildly uncalled for.
It really places an inhuman
burden on the woman

Spanish: 
que básicamente no podrá hacer
otra cosa que quedar embarazada,
y rogar que sean
octillizos cada vez.
Sé que la muerte ni siquiera existe
en esta narrativa, pero caramba.
Dale un descansito
a Eva.
Preferiría tener
un Dios que diga:
"Puebla la Tierra... eventualmente.
Pero toma este condón por si
quieres tomarte un descanso".
Entonces Dios dijo:
"Os he dado toda planta que da 
semilla en la faz de toda la tierra,
y todo árbol que tiene
fruto que da semilla;
esto os servirá
de alimento.
Y a toda bestia de la tierra,
a toda ave de los cielos
y a todo lo que se mueve 
sobre la tierra,
y que tiene vida,
les he dado toda planta
verde para alimento.
Y así fue.
Si eso es verdad, ¿por qué hay
tantas plantas venenosas?
Por alguna razón los padres no les dicen
a sus hijos que corran en el jardín trasero
y coman de todo
lo que encuentren.
No todo es bueno
o saludable.
En tal caso, si podemos
tomar cualquier planta,

English: 
who basically can't do anything
other than be pregnant and
pray for octuplets
every time.
I know death doesn't even exist
yet in this narrative, but still.
Give Eve some rest.
I would so much rather
have a God that says
"Fill the Earth... eventually.
But here's a condom if you just
want to take a break for a bit."
Then God said, I give you every
seed-bearing plant on the face
of the whole earth
and every tree that
has fruit with seed in it.
They will be
yours for food.
And to all the beasts of the earth
and all the birds in the sky
and all the creatures that
move along the ground
- everything that has
the breath of life in it -
I give every green
plant for food.
And it was so.
If that's true, then why are
so many plants poisonous?
There's a reason parents don't tell
their kids to run in the garden
in the backyard
and eat whatever
you find.
Not all of it is
good or healthy.
If anything, if all plants
are ours for the taking,

Indonesian: 
who basically can't do anything other than be pregnant and
pray for octuplets every time.
I know death doesn't even exist yet in this narrative, but still.
Give Eve some rest.
I would so much rather have a God that says
"Fill the Earth... eventually.
But here's a condom if you just want to take a break for a bit."
Then God said, I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth
and every tree that has fruit with seed in it.
They will be yours for food.
And to all the beasts of the earth and all the birds in the sky
and all the creatures that move along the ground
- everything that has the breath of life in it -
I give every green plant for food.
And it was so.
If that's true, then why are so many plants poisonous?
There's a reason parents don't tell their kids to run in the garden in the backyard
and eat whatever you find.
Not all of it is good or healthy.
If anything, if all plants are ours for the taking,

English: 
does that mean God
is pro-marijuana?
God saw all
that he had made,
and it was
very good.
And there was evening,
and there was morning
- the sixth day.
Was it good, though?
I mean, God designed a world
where death could enter,
and we could suffer,
and the animals would turn on
each other and become predator
and prey.
And climate change
could occur.
It's not a utopia.
Not even then.
The word Eden has become
synonymous with perfect but
the whole place was still a
breeding ground where eventual
chaos could thrive.
God could've used that seventh day
to create a buffer of some kind.
But He rested.
Thanks for nothing.
There is a group
called Answers in Genesis
-- they're the ones behind the
Creation Museum and Ark Encounter --
that believes everything we need
to know about our origins
is contained in
the Book of Genesis.
But just from
the first chapter,
it's easy to see that the
answers are not in Genesis.
There are only
more questions.

Indonesian: 
does that mean God is pro-marijuana?
God saw all that he had made,
and it was very good.
And there was evening, and there was morning
- the sixth day.
Was it good, though?
I mean, God designed a world where death could enter,
and we could suffer,
and the animals would turn on each other and become predator and prey.
And climate change could occur.
It's not a utopia. Not even then.
The word Eden has become synonymous with perfect but
the whole place was still a breeding ground where eventual chaos could thrive.
God could've used that seventh day to create a buffer of some kind.
But He rested.
Thanks for nothing.
There is a group called Answers in Genesis
-- they're the ones behind the Creation Museum and Ark Encounter --
that believes everything we need to know about our origins
is contained in the Book of Genesis.
But just from the first chapter,
it's easy to see that the answers are not in Genesis.
There are only more questions.

Spanish: 
significa que Dios
es pro-mariguana?
Y vio Dios todo lo
que había hecho,
y era bueno
en gran manera.
Y fue la tarde 
y fue la mañana:
el sexto día.
¿Y fue bueno?
Es decir, Dios diseñó un mundo
donde la muerte puede entrar,
y podemos sufrir,
y los animales se vuelven unos contra otros,
y se convierten en presas y depredadores.
Y puede haber
cambio climático.
No es una utopía.
Ni lo fue entonces.
La palabra Edén se ha convertido
en sinónimo de perfecto, a pesar
de haber sido un caldo de cultivo
donde el caos se podía desencadernar.
Dios pudo haber usado ese séptimo día
para crear algún tipo de atenuante.
Pero Él descansó.
Gracias por nada.
Hay un grupo llamado 
Respuestas en Génesis
- son los creadores del Museo de la Creación
y el Encuentro con el Arca -
que cree que todo lo que necesitamos
saber sobre nuestros orígenes
está contenido en el
Libro del Génesis.
Pero desde el
primer capítulo,
es fácil ver que las respuestas
no están en Génesis.
Solo hay más preguntas.
