MISUNDERSTANDING
MISUNDERSTANDING OF
MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE
MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE BILL.
MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE BILL.
ABC10
MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE BILL.
ABC10 ZACH
MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE BILL.
ABC10 ZACH FUENTES
MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE BILL.
ABC10 ZACH FUENTES HAS
MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE BILL.
ABC10 ZACH FUENTES HAS A
MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE BILL.
ABC10 ZACH FUENTES HAS A CLOSER
MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE BILL.
ABC10 ZACH FUENTES HAS A CLOSER
LOOK
MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE BILL.
ABC10 ZACH FUENTES HAS A CLOSER
LOOK AT
MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE BILL.
ABC10 ZACH FUENTES HAS A CLOSER
LOOK AT WHAT
MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE BILL.
ABC10 ZACH FUENTES HAS A CLOSER
LOOK AT WHAT THIS
MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE BILL.
ABC10 ZACH FUENTES HAS A CLOSER
LOOK AT WHAT THIS BILL
MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE BILL.
ABC10 ZACH FUENTES HAS A CLOSER
LOOK AT WHAT THIS BILL AIMS
MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE BILL.
ABC10 ZACH FUENTES HAS A CLOSER
LOOK AT WHAT THIS BILL AIMS TO
ABC10 ZACH FUENTES HAS A CLOSER
LOOK AT WHAT THIS BILL AIMS TO
ABC10 ZACH FUENTES HAS A CLOSER
LOOK AT WHAT THIS BILL AIMS TO
DO.
LOOK AT WHAT THIS BILL AIMS TO
DO.
LOOK AT WHAT THIS BILL AIMS TO
DO.
>>
LOOK AT WHAT THIS BILL AIMS TO
DO.
>> Reporter:
LOOK AT WHAT THIS BILL AIMS TO
DO.
>> Reporter: UNDER
LOOK AT WHAT THIS BILL AIMS TO
DO.
>> Reporter: UNDER THE
LOOK AT WHAT THIS BILL AIMS TO
DO.
>> Reporter: UNDER THE CURRENT
DO.
>> Reporter: UNDER THE CURRENT
DO.
>> Reporter: UNDER THE CURRENT
LAW
DO.
>> Reporter: UNDER THE CURRENT
LAW WHETHER
DO.
>> Reporter: UNDER THE CURRENT
LAW WHETHER THEY
DO.
>> Reporter: UNDER THE CURRENT
LAW WHETHER THEY END
DO.
>> Reporter: UNDER THE CURRENT
LAW WHETHER THEY END UP
DO.
>> Reporter: UNDER THE CURRENT
LAW WHETHER THEY END UP ON
DO.
>> Reporter: UNDER THE CURRENT
LAW WHETHER THEY END UP ON THE
>> Reporter: UNDER THE CURRENT
LAW WHETHER THEY END UP ON THE
>> Reporter: UNDER THE CURRENT
LAW WHETHER THEY END UP ON THE
SEX
>> Reporter: UNDER THE CURRENT
LAW WHETHER THEY END UP ON THE
SEX OFFENDER
>> Reporter: UNDER THE CURRENT
LAW WHETHER THEY END UP ON THE
SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY
>> Reporter: UNDER THE CURRENT
LAW WHETHER THEY END UP ON THE
SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY WILL
LAW WHETHER THEY END UP ON THE
SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY WILL
LAW WHETHER THEY END UP ON THE
SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY WILL
DEPEND
LAW WHETHER THEY END UP ON THE
SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY WILL
DEPEND ON
LAW WHETHER THEY END UP ON THE
SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY WILL
DEPEND ON WHAT
LAW WHETHER THEY END UP ON THE
SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY WILL
DEPEND ON WHAT KIND
LAW WHETHER THEY END UP ON THE
SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY WILL
DEPEND ON WHAT KIND OF
LAW WHETHER THEY END UP ON THE
SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY WILL
DEPEND ON WHAT KIND OF SEX
LAW WHETHER THEY END UP ON THE
SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY WILL
DEPEND ON WHAT KIND OF SEX THEY
SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY WILL
DEPEND ON WHAT KIND OF SEX THEY
SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY WILL
DEPEND ON WHAT KIND OF SEX THEY
WOULD
SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY WILL
DEPEND ON WHAT KIND OF SEX THEY
WOULD HAVE.
DEPEND ON WHAT KIND OF SEX THEY
WOULD HAVE.
DEPEND ON WHAT KIND OF SEX THEY
WOULD HAVE.
IT
DEPEND ON WHAT KIND OF SEX THEY
WOULD HAVE.
IT DISCRIMINATES
DEPEND ON WHAT KIND OF SEX THEY
WOULD HAVE.
IT DISCRIMINATES AGAINST
DEPEND ON WHAT KIND OF SEX THEY
WOULD HAVE.
IT DISCRIMINATES AGAINST THE
WOULD HAVE.
IT DISCRIMINATES AGAINST THE
WOULD HAVE.
IT DISCRIMINATES AGAINST THE
LGBTQ
WOULD HAVE.
IT DISCRIMINATES AGAINST THE
LGBTQ COMMUNITY
WOULD HAVE.
IT DISCRIMINATES AGAINST THE
LGBTQ COMMUNITY AND
WOULD HAVE.
IT DISCRIMINATES AGAINST THE
LGBTQ COMMUNITY AND HIS
WOULD HAVE.
IT DISCRIMINATES AGAINST THE
LGBTQ COMMUNITY AND HIS BILL
IT DISCRIMINATES AGAINST THE
LGBTQ COMMUNITY AND HIS BILL
IT DISCRIMINATES AGAINST THE
LGBTQ COMMUNITY AND HIS BILL
AIMS
IT DISCRIMINATES AGAINST THE
LGBTQ COMMUNITY AND HIS BILL
AIMS TO
IT DISCRIMINATES AGAINST THE
LGBTQ COMMUNITY AND HIS BILL
AIMS TO CHANGE
IT DISCRIMINATES AGAINST THE
LGBTQ COMMUNITY AND HIS BILL
AIMS TO CHANGE THAT.
LGBTQ COMMUNITY AND HIS BILL
AIMS TO CHANGE THAT.
LGBTQ COMMUNITY AND HIS BILL
AIMS TO CHANGE THAT.
AND
LGBTQ COMMUNITY AND HIS BILL
AIMS TO CHANGE THAT.
AND SOCIAL
LGBTQ COMMUNITY AND HIS BILL
AIMS TO CHANGE THAT.
AND SOCIAL MEDIA
LGBTQ COMMUNITY AND HIS BILL
AIMS TO CHANGE THAT.
AND SOCIAL MEDIA COMMENTS
LGBTQ COMMUNITY AND HIS BILL
AIMS TO CHANGE THAT.
AND SOCIAL MEDIA COMMENTS LIKE
AIMS TO CHANGE THAT.
AND SOCIAL MEDIA COMMENTS LIKE
AIMS TO CHANGE THAT.
AND SOCIAL MEDIA COMMENTS LIKE
THESE
AIMS TO CHANGE THAT.
AND SOCIAL MEDIA COMMENTS LIKE
THESE ARE
AIMS TO CHANGE THAT.
AND SOCIAL MEDIA COMMENTS LIKE
THESE ARE FLOODING
AIMS TO CHANGE THAT.
AND SOCIAL MEDIA COMMENTS LIKE
THESE ARE FLOODING THE
AND SOCIAL MEDIA COMMENTS LIKE
THESE ARE FLOODING THE
AND SOCIAL MEDIA COMMENTS LIKE
THESE ARE FLOODING THE
INTERNET,
AND SOCIAL MEDIA COMMENTS LIKE
THESE ARE FLOODING THE
INTERNET, CALLING
AND SOCIAL MEDIA COMMENTS LIKE
THESE ARE FLOODING THE
INTERNET, CALLING OUT
AND SOCIAL MEDIA COMMENTS LIKE
THESE ARE FLOODING THE
INTERNET, CALLING OUT SB145.
THESE ARE FLOODING THE
INTERNET, CALLING OUT SB145.
THESE ARE FLOODING THE
INTERNET, CALLING OUT SB145.
SCOTT
THESE ARE FLOODING THE
INTERNET, CALLING OUT SB145.
SCOTT WEINER
THESE ARE FLOODING THE
INTERNET, CALLING OUT SB145.
SCOTT WEINER SAYS
THESE ARE FLOODING THE
INTERNET, CALLING OUT SB145.
SCOTT WEINER SAYS THAT
THESE ARE FLOODING THE
INTERNET, CALLING OUT SB145.
SCOTT WEINER SAYS THAT IS
THESE ARE FLOODING THE
INTERNET, CALLING OUT SB145.
SCOTT WEINER SAYS THAT IS NOT
INTERNET, CALLING OUT SB145.
SCOTT WEINER SAYS THAT IS NOT
INTERNET, CALLING OUT SB145.
SCOTT WEINER SAYS THAT IS NOT
TRUE.
SCOTT WEINER SAYS THAT IS NOT
TRUE.
SCOTT WEINER SAYS THAT IS NOT
TRUE.
>>
SCOTT WEINER SAYS THAT IS NOT
TRUE.
>> IT'S
SCOTT WEINER SAYS THAT IS NOT
TRUE.
>> IT'S AN
SCOTT WEINER SAYS THAT IS NOT
TRUE.
>> IT'S AN ANTI-DISCRIMINATION
TRUE.
>> IT'S AN ANTI-DISCRIMINATION
TRUE.
>> IT'S AN ANTI-DISCRIMINATION
LAW
TRUE.
>> IT'S AN ANTI-DISCRIMINATION
LAW THAT
TRUE.
>> IT'S AN ANTI-DISCRIMINATION
LAW THAT ENDS
TRUE.
>> IT'S AN ANTI-DISCRIMINATION
LAW THAT ENDS DISCRIMINATION
>> IT'S AN ANTI-DISCRIMINATION
LAW THAT ENDS DISCRIMINATION
>> IT'S AN ANTI-DISCRIMINATION
LAW THAT ENDS DISCRIMINATION
AGAINST
>> IT'S AN ANTI-DISCRIMINATION
LAW THAT ENDS DISCRIMINATION
AGAINST LGBTQ
>> IT'S AN ANTI-DISCRIMINATION
LAW THAT ENDS DISCRIMINATION
AGAINST LGBTQ YOUNG
>> IT'S AN ANTI-DISCRIMINATION
LAW THAT ENDS DISCRIMINATION
AGAINST LGBTQ YOUNG PEOPLE
>> IT'S AN ANTI-DISCRIMINATION
LAW THAT ENDS DISCRIMINATION
AGAINST LGBTQ YOUNG PEOPLE ON
LAW THAT ENDS DISCRIMINATION
AGAINST LGBTQ YOUNG PEOPLE ON
LAW THAT ENDS DISCRIMINATION
AGAINST LGBTQ YOUNG PEOPLE ON
THE
LAW THAT ENDS DISCRIMINATION
AGAINST LGBTQ YOUNG PEOPLE ON
THE SEX
LAW THAT ENDS DISCRIMINATION
AGAINST LGBTQ YOUNG PEOPLE ON
THE SEX OFFENDER
LAW THAT ENDS DISCRIMINATION
AGAINST LGBTQ YOUNG PEOPLE ON
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY.
AGAINST LGBTQ YOUNG PEOPLE ON
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY.
AGAINST LGBTQ YOUNG PEOPLE ON
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY.
>>
AGAINST LGBTQ YOUNG PEOPLE ON
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY.
>> Reporter:
AGAINST LGBTQ YOUNG PEOPLE ON
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY.
>> Reporter: SOMEONE
AGAINST LGBTQ YOUNG PEOPLE ON
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY.
>> Reporter: SOMEONE BETWEEN
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY.
>> Reporter: SOMEONE BETWEEN
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY.
>> Reporter: SOMEONE BETWEEN
THE
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY.
>> Reporter: SOMEONE BETWEEN
THE AGES
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY.
>> Reporter: SOMEONE BETWEEN
THE AGES OF
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY.
>> Reporter: SOMEONE BETWEEN
THE AGES OF 14
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY.
>> Reporter: SOMEONE BETWEEN
THE AGES OF 14 AND
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY.
>> Reporter: SOMEONE BETWEEN
THE AGES OF 14 AND 17
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY.
>> Reporter: SOMEONE BETWEEN
THE AGES OF 14 AND 17 HAS
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY.
>> Reporter: SOMEONE BETWEEN
THE AGES OF 14 AND 17 HAS SEX
>> Reporter: SOMEONE BETWEEN
THE AGES OF 14 AND 17 HAS SEX
>> Reporter: SOMEONE BETWEEN
THE AGES OF 14 AND 17 HAS SEX
WITH
>> Reporter: SOMEONE BETWEEN
THE AGES OF 14 AND 17 HAS SEX
WITH SOMEONE
>> Reporter: SOMEONE BETWEEN
THE AGES OF 14 AND 17 HAS SEX
WITH SOMEONE NO
>> Reporter: SOMEONE BETWEEN
THE AGES OF 14 AND 17 HAS SEX
WITH SOMEONE NO MORE
>> Reporter: SOMEONE BETWEEN
THE AGES OF 14 AND 17 HAS SEX
WITH SOMEONE NO MORE THAN
>> Reporter: SOMEONE BETWEEN
THE AGES OF 14 AND 17 HAS SEX
WITH SOMEONE NO MORE THAN 10
THE AGES OF 14 AND 17 HAS SEX
WITH SOMEONE NO MORE THAN 10
THE AGES OF 14 AND 17 HAS SEX
WITH SOMEONE NO MORE THAN 10
YEARS
THE AGES OF 14 AND 17 HAS SEX
WITH SOMEONE NO MORE THAN 10
YEARS OLDER
THE AGES OF 14 AND 17 HAS SEX
WITH SOMEONE NO MORE THAN 10
YEARS OLDER THAN
THE AGES OF 14 AND 17 HAS SEX
WITH SOMEONE NO MORE THAN 10
YEARS OLDER THAN THEM.
WITH SOMEONE NO MORE THAN 10
YEARS OLDER THAN THEM.
WITH SOMEONE NO MORE THAN 10
YEARS OLDER THAN THEM.
RIGHT
WITH SOMEONE NO MORE THAN 10
YEARS OLDER THAN THEM.
RIGHT NOW
WITH SOMEONE NO MORE THAN 10
YEARS OLDER THAN THEM.
RIGHT NOW THE
WITH SOMEONE NO MORE THAN 10
YEARS OLDER THAN THEM.
RIGHT NOW THE LAW
WITH SOMEONE NO MORE THAN 10
YEARS OLDER THAN THEM.
RIGHT NOW THE LAW SAYS
WITH SOMEONE NO MORE THAN 10
YEARS OLDER THAN THEM.
RIGHT NOW THE LAW SAYS WHETHER
YEARS OLDER THAN THEM.
RIGHT NOW THE LAW SAYS WHETHER
YEARS OLDER THAN THEM.
RIGHT NOW THE LAW SAYS WHETHER
THAT
YEARS OLDER THAN THEM.
RIGHT NOW THE LAW SAYS WHETHER
THAT OLDER
YEARS OLDER THAN THEM.
RIGHT NOW THE LAW SAYS WHETHER
THAT OLDER PERSON
YEARS OLDER THAN THEM.
RIGHT NOW THE LAW SAYS WHETHER
THAT OLDER PERSON ENDS
YEARS OLDER THAN THEM.
RIGHT NOW THE LAW SAYS WHETHER
THAT OLDER PERSON ENDS UP
YEARS OLDER THAN THEM.
RIGHT NOW THE LAW SAYS WHETHER
THAT OLDER PERSON ENDS UP ON
RIGHT NOW THE LAW SAYS WHETHER
THAT OLDER PERSON ENDS UP ON
RIGHT NOW THE LAW SAYS WHETHER
THAT OLDER PERSON ENDS UP ON
THE
RIGHT NOW THE LAW SAYS WHETHER
THAT OLDER PERSON ENDS UP ON
THE SEX
RIGHT NOW THE LAW SAYS WHETHER
THAT OLDER PERSON ENDS UP ON
THE SEX OFFENDER
RIGHT NOW THE LAW SAYS WHETHER
THAT OLDER PERSON ENDS UP ON
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY
RIGHT NOW THE LAW SAYS WHETHER
THAT OLDER PERSON ENDS UP ON
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY WILL
THAT OLDER PERSON ENDS UP ON
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY WILL
THAT OLDER PERSON ENDS UP ON
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY WILL
DEPEND
THAT OLDER PERSON ENDS UP ON
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY WILL
DEPEND ON
THAT OLDER PERSON ENDS UP ON
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY WILL
DEPEND ON WHAT
THAT OLDER PERSON ENDS UP ON
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY WILL
DEPEND ON WHAT KIND
THAT OLDER PERSON ENDS UP ON
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY WILL
DEPEND ON WHAT KIND OF
THAT OLDER PERSON ENDS UP ON
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY WILL
DEPEND ON WHAT KIND OF SEX
THAT OLDER PERSON ENDS UP ON
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY WILL
DEPEND ON WHAT KIND OF SEX THEY
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY WILL
DEPEND ON WHAT KIND OF SEX THEY
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY WILL
DEPEND ON WHAT KIND OF SEX THEY
HAD.
DEPEND ON WHAT KIND OF SEX THEY
HAD.
DEPEND ON WHAT KIND OF SEX THEY
HAD.
>>
DEPEND ON WHAT KIND OF SEX THEY
HAD.
>> A
DEPEND ON WHAT KIND OF SEX THEY
HAD.
>> A 19-YEAR-OLD
DEPEND ON WHAT KIND OF SEX THEY
HAD.
>> A 19-YEAR-OLD HAS
DEPEND ON WHAT KIND OF SEX THEY
HAD.
>> A 19-YEAR-OLD HAS A
DEPEND ON WHAT KIND OF SEX THEY
HAD.
>> A 19-YEAR-OLD HAS A 17-YEAR-
HAD.
>> A 19-YEAR-OLD HAS A 17-YEAR-
HAD.
>> A 19-YEAR-OLD HAS A 17-YEAR-
OLD
HAD.
>> A 19-YEAR-OLD HAS A 17-YEAR-
OLD GIRLFRIEND
HAD.
>> A 19-YEAR-OLD HAS A 17-YEAR-
OLD GIRLFRIEND AND
HAD.
>> A 19-YEAR-OLD HAS A 17-YEAR-
OLD GIRLFRIEND AND THEY
HAD.
>> A 19-YEAR-OLD HAS A 17-YEAR-
OLD GIRLFRIEND AND THEY HAVE
>> A 19-YEAR-OLD HAS A 17-YEAR-
OLD GIRLFRIEND AND THEY HAVE
>> A 19-YEAR-OLD HAS A 17-YEAR-
OLD GIRLFRIEND AND THEY HAVE
SEX,
>> A 19-YEAR-OLD HAS A 17-YEAR-
OLD GIRLFRIEND AND THEY HAVE
SEX, THAT
>> A 19-YEAR-OLD HAS A 17-YEAR-
OLD GIRLFRIEND AND THEY HAVE
SEX, THAT IS
>> A 19-YEAR-OLD HAS A 17-YEAR-
OLD GIRLFRIEND AND THEY HAVE
SEX, THAT IS STATUTORY
>> A 19-YEAR-OLD HAS A 17-YEAR-
OLD GIRLFRIEND AND THEY HAVE
SEX, THAT IS STATUTORY RAPE.
OLD GIRLFRIEND AND THEY HAVE
SEX, THAT IS STATUTORY RAPE.
OLD GIRLFRIEND AND THEY HAVE
SEX, THAT IS STATUTORY RAPE.
BUT
OLD GIRLFRIEND AND THEY HAVE
SEX, THAT IS STATUTORY RAPE.
BUT THE
OLD GIRLFRIEND AND THEY HAVE
SEX, THAT IS STATUTORY RAPE.
BUT THE LAW
OLD GIRLFRIEND AND THEY HAVE
SEX, THAT IS STATUTORY RAPE.
BUT THE LAW RIGHT
OLD GIRLFRIEND AND THEY HAVE
SEX, THAT IS STATUTORY RAPE.
BUT THE LAW RIGHT NOW
OLD GIRLFRIEND AND THEY HAVE
SEX, THAT IS STATUTORY RAPE.
BUT THE LAW RIGHT NOW SAYS
OLD GIRLFRIEND AND THEY HAVE
SEX, THAT IS STATUTORY RAPE.
BUT THE LAW RIGHT NOW SAYS THAT
SEX, THAT IS STATUTORY RAPE.
BUT THE LAW RIGHT NOW SAYS THAT
SEX, THAT IS STATUTORY RAPE.
BUT THE LAW RIGHT NOW SAYS THAT
THE
SEX, THAT IS STATUTORY RAPE.
BUT THE LAW RIGHT NOW SAYS THAT
THE JUDGE
SEX, THAT IS STATUTORY RAPE.
BUT THE LAW RIGHT NOW SAYS THAT
THE JUDGE DOES
SEX, THAT IS STATUTORY RAPE.
BUT THE LAW RIGHT NOW SAYS THAT
THE JUDGE DOES NOT
SEX, THAT IS STATUTORY RAPE.
BUT THE LAW RIGHT NOW SAYS THAT
THE JUDGE DOES NOT HAVE
SEX, THAT IS STATUTORY RAPE.
BUT THE LAW RIGHT NOW SAYS THAT
THE JUDGE DOES NOT HAVE TO
SEX, THAT IS STATUTORY RAPE.
BUT THE LAW RIGHT NOW SAYS THAT
THE JUDGE DOES NOT HAVE TO PUT
BUT THE LAW RIGHT NOW SAYS THAT
THE JUDGE DOES NOT HAVE TO PUT
BUT THE LAW RIGHT NOW SAYS THAT
THE JUDGE DOES NOT HAVE TO PUT
THAT
BUT THE LAW RIGHT NOW SAYS THAT
THE JUDGE DOES NOT HAVE TO PUT
THAT 19-YEAR-OLD
BUT THE LAW RIGHT NOW SAYS THAT
THE JUDGE DOES NOT HAVE TO PUT
THAT 19-YEAR-OLD BOY
BUT THE LAW RIGHT NOW SAYS THAT
THE JUDGE DOES NOT HAVE TO PUT
THAT 19-YEAR-OLD BOY ON
BUT THE LAW RIGHT NOW SAYS THAT
THE JUDGE DOES NOT HAVE TO PUT
THAT 19-YEAR-OLD BOY ON THE
BUT THE LAW RIGHT NOW SAYS THAT
THE JUDGE DOES NOT HAVE TO PUT
THAT 19-YEAR-OLD BOY ON THE SEX
THE JUDGE DOES NOT HAVE TO PUT
THAT 19-YEAR-OLD BOY ON THE SEX
THE JUDGE DOES NOT HAVE TO PUT
THAT 19-YEAR-OLD BOY ON THE SEX
OFFENDER
THE JUDGE DOES NOT HAVE TO PUT
THAT 19-YEAR-OLD BOY ON THE SEX
OFFENDER REGISTRY
THE JUDGE DOES NOT HAVE TO PUT
THAT 19-YEAR-OLD BOY ON THE SEX
OFFENDER REGISTRY BECAUSE
THE JUDGE DOES NOT HAVE TO PUT
THAT 19-YEAR-OLD BOY ON THE SEX
OFFENDER REGISTRY BECAUSE OF
THAT 19-YEAR-OLD BOY ON THE SEX
OFFENDER REGISTRY BECAUSE OF
THAT 19-YEAR-OLD BOY ON THE SEX
OFFENDER REGISTRY BECAUSE OF
THE
THAT 19-YEAR-OLD BOY ON THE SEX
OFFENDER REGISTRY BECAUSE OF
THE KIND
THAT 19-YEAR-OLD BOY ON THE SEX
OFFENDER REGISTRY BECAUSE OF
THE KIND OF
THAT 19-YEAR-OLD BOY ON THE SEX
OFFENDER REGISTRY BECAUSE OF
THE KIND OF SEX
THAT 19-YEAR-OLD BOY ON THE SEX
OFFENDER REGISTRY BECAUSE OF
THE KIND OF SEX THAT
THAT 19-YEAR-OLD BOY ON THE SEX
OFFENDER REGISTRY BECAUSE OF
THE KIND OF SEX THAT THEY
THAT 19-YEAR-OLD BOY ON THE SEX
OFFENDER REGISTRY BECAUSE OF
THE KIND OF SEX THAT THEY WERE
OFFENDER REGISTRY BECAUSE OF
THE KIND OF SEX THAT THEY WERE
OFFENDER REGISTRY BECAUSE OF
THE KIND OF SEX THAT THEY WERE
HAVING.
THE KIND OF SEX THAT THEY WERE
HAVING.
THE KIND OF SEX THAT THEY WERE
HAVING.
BUT
THE KIND OF SEX THAT THEY WERE
HAVING.
BUT IF
THE KIND OF SEX THAT THEY WERE
HAVING.
BUT IF THE
THE KIND OF SEX THAT THEY WERE
HAVING.
BUT IF THE 19-YEAR-OLD
THE KIND OF SEX THAT THEY WERE
HAVING.
BUT IF THE 19-YEAR-OLD BOY
HAVING.
BUT IF THE 19-YEAR-OLD BOY
HAVING.
BUT IF THE 19-YEAR-OLD BOY
HAVING
HAVING.
BUT IF THE 19-YEAR-OLD BOY
HAVING SEX
HAVING.
BUT IF THE 19-YEAR-OLD BOY
HAVING SEX WITH
HAVING.
BUT IF THE 19-YEAR-OLD BOY
HAVING SEX WITH HIS
HAVING.
BUT IF THE 19-YEAR-OLD BOY
HAVING SEX WITH HIS 17-YEAR-OLD
BUT IF THE 19-YEAR-OLD BOY
HAVING SEX WITH HIS 17-YEAR-OLD
BUT IF THE 19-YEAR-OLD BOY
HAVING SEX WITH HIS 17-YEAR-OLD
BOYFRIEND,
BUT IF THE 19-YEAR-OLD BOY
HAVING SEX WITH HIS 17-YEAR-OLD
BOYFRIEND, THEN
BUT IF THE 19-YEAR-OLD BOY
HAVING SEX WITH HIS 17-YEAR-OLD
BOYFRIEND, THEN THE
BUT IF THE 19-YEAR-OLD BOY
HAVING SEX WITH HIS 17-YEAR-OLD
BOYFRIEND, THEN THE JUDGE,
BUT IF THE 19-YEAR-OLD BOY
HAVING SEX WITH HIS 17-YEAR-OLD
BOYFRIEND, THEN THE JUDGE, THEY
HAVING SEX WITH HIS 17-YEAR-OLD
BOYFRIEND, THEN THE JUDGE, THEY
HAVING SEX WITH HIS 17-YEAR-OLD
BOYFRIEND, THEN THE JUDGE, THEY
MUST
HAVING SEX WITH HIS 17-YEAR-OLD
BOYFRIEND, THEN THE JUDGE, THEY
MUST PUT
HAVING SEX WITH HIS 17-YEAR-OLD
BOYFRIEND, THEN THE JUDGE, THEY
MUST PUT THAT
HAVING SEX WITH HIS 17-YEAR-OLD
BOYFRIEND, THEN THE JUDGE, THEY
MUST PUT THAT 19-YEAR-OLD
HAVING SEX WITH HIS 17-YEAR-OLD
BOYFRIEND, THEN THE JUDGE, THEY
MUST PUT THAT 19-YEAR-OLD ON
BOYFRIEND, THEN THE JUDGE, THEY
MUST PUT THAT 19-YEAR-OLD ON
BOYFRIEND, THEN THE JUDGE, THEY
MUST PUT THAT 19-YEAR-OLD ON
THE
BOYFRIEND, THEN THE JUDGE, THEY
MUST PUT THAT 19-YEAR-OLD ON
THE SEX
BOYFRIEND, THEN THE JUDGE, THEY
MUST PUT THAT 19-YEAR-OLD ON
THE SEX OFFENDER
BOYFRIEND, THEN THE JUDGE, THEY
MUST PUT THAT 19-YEAR-OLD ON
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY
BOYFRIEND, THEN THE JUDGE, THEY
MUST PUT THAT 19-YEAR-OLD ON
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY EVEN
MUST PUT THAT 19-YEAR-OLD ON
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY EVEN
MUST PUT THAT 19-YEAR-OLD ON
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY EVEN
IF
MUST PUT THAT 19-YEAR-OLD ON
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY EVEN
IF IT
MUST PUT THAT 19-YEAR-OLD ON
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY EVEN
IF IT WAS
MUST PUT THAT 19-YEAR-OLD ON
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY EVEN
IF IT WAS COMPLETELY
MUST PUT THAT 19-YEAR-OLD ON
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY EVEN
IF IT WAS COMPLETELY CONSENSUAL
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY EVEN
IF IT WAS COMPLETELY CONSENSUAL
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY EVEN
IF IT WAS COMPLETELY CONSENSUAL
AND
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY EVEN
IF IT WAS COMPLETELY CONSENSUAL
AND THEY
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY EVEN
IF IT WAS COMPLETELY CONSENSUAL
AND THEY WERE
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY EVEN
IF IT WAS COMPLETELY CONSENSUAL
AND THEY WERE BOYFRIENDS,
THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY EVEN
IF IT WAS COMPLETELY CONSENSUAL
AND THEY WERE BOYFRIENDS, EVEN
IF IT WAS COMPLETELY CONSENSUAL
AND THEY WERE BOYFRIENDS, EVEN
IF IT WAS COMPLETELY CONSENSUAL
AND THEY WERE BOYFRIENDS, EVEN
IF
IF IT WAS COMPLETELY CONSENSUAL
AND THEY WERE BOYFRIENDS, EVEN
IF THERE
IF IT WAS COMPLETELY CONSENSUAL
AND THEY WERE BOYFRIENDS, EVEN
IF THERE IS
IF IT WAS COMPLETELY CONSENSUAL
AND THEY WERE BOYFRIENDS, EVEN
IF THERE IS NOTHING,
IF IT WAS COMPLETELY CONSENSUAL
AND THEY WERE BOYFRIENDS, EVEN
IF THERE IS NOTHING, OF
IF IT WAS COMPLETELY CONSENSUAL
AND THEY WERE BOYFRIENDS, EVEN
IF THERE IS NOTHING, OF COURSE,
AND THEY WERE BOYFRIENDS, EVEN
IF THERE IS NOTHING, OF COURSE,
AND THEY WERE BOYFRIENDS, EVEN
IF THERE IS NOTHING, OF COURSE,
PREDATORY
AND THEY WERE BOYFRIENDS, EVEN
IF THERE IS NOTHING, OF COURSE,
PREDATORY ABOUT
AND THEY WERE BOYFRIENDS, EVEN
IF THERE IS NOTHING, OF COURSE,
PREDATORY ABOUT IT.
IF THERE IS NOTHING, OF COURSE,
PREDATORY ABOUT IT.
IF THERE IS NOTHING, OF COURSE,
PREDATORY ABOUT IT.
>>
IF THERE IS NOTHING, OF COURSE,
PREDATORY ABOUT IT.
>> Reporter:
IF THERE IS NOTHING, OF COURSE,
PREDATORY ABOUT IT.
>> Reporter: THAT'S
IF THERE IS NOTHING, OF COURSE,
PREDATORY ABOUT IT.
>> Reporter: THAT'S BECAUSE
IF THERE IS NOTHING, OF COURSE,
PREDATORY ABOUT IT.
>> Reporter: THAT'S BECAUSE THE
PREDATORY ABOUT IT.
>> Reporter: THAT'S BECAUSE THE
PREDATORY ABOUT IT.
>> Reporter: THAT'S BECAUSE THE
CURRENT
PREDATORY ABOUT IT.
>> Reporter: THAT'S BECAUSE THE
CURRENT LAW
PREDATORY ABOUT IT.
>> Reporter: THAT'S BECAUSE THE
CURRENT LAW SAYS
PREDATORY ABOUT IT.
>> Reporter: THAT'S BECAUSE THE
CURRENT LAW SAYS THAT
PREDATORY ABOUT IT.
>> Reporter: THAT'S BECAUSE THE
CURRENT LAW SAYS THAT THE
PREDATORY ABOUT IT.
>> Reporter: THAT'S BECAUSE THE
CURRENT LAW SAYS THAT THE KIND
>> Reporter: THAT'S BECAUSE THE
CURRENT LAW SAYS THAT THE KIND
>> Reporter: THAT'S BECAUSE THE
CURRENT LAW SAYS THAT THE KIND
OF
>> Reporter: THAT'S BECAUSE THE
CURRENT LAW SAYS THAT THE KIND
OF SEX
>> Reporter: THAT'S BECAUSE THE
CURRENT LAW SAYS THAT THE KIND
OF SEX INVOLVED,
>> Reporter: THAT'S BECAUSE THE
CURRENT LAW SAYS THAT THE KIND
OF SEX INVOLVED, THEN
>> Reporter: THAT'S BECAUSE THE
CURRENT LAW SAYS THAT THE KIND
OF SEX INVOLVED, THEN THE
CURRENT LAW SAYS THAT THE KIND
OF SEX INVOLVED, THEN THE
CURRENT LAW SAYS THAT THE KIND
OF SEX INVOLVED, THEN THE
PERSON
CURRENT LAW SAYS THAT THE KIND
OF SEX INVOLVED, THEN THE
PERSON IS
CURRENT LAW SAYS THAT THE KIND
OF SEX INVOLVED, THEN THE
PERSON IS AUTOMATICALLY
OF SEX INVOLVED, THEN THE
PERSON IS AUTOMATICALLY
OF SEX INVOLVED, THEN THE
PERSON IS AUTOMATICALLY
INVOLVED
OF SEX INVOLVED, THEN THE
PERSON IS AUTOMATICALLY
INVOLVED IN
OF SEX INVOLVED, THEN THE
PERSON IS AUTOMATICALLY
INVOLVED IN THE
OF SEX INVOLVED, THEN THE
PERSON IS AUTOMATICALLY
INVOLVED IN THE SEX
OF SEX INVOLVED, THEN THE
PERSON IS AUTOMATICALLY
INVOLVED IN THE SEX OFFENDER
PERSON IS AUTOMATICALLY
INVOLVED IN THE SEX OFFENDER
PERSON IS AUTOMATICALLY
INVOLVED IN THE SEX OFFENDER
REGISTRY.
INVOLVED IN THE SEX OFFENDER
REGISTRY.
INVOLVED IN THE SEX OFFENDER
REGISTRY.
HOWEVER,
INVOLVED IN THE SEX OFFENDER
REGISTRY.
HOWEVER, IT
INVOLVED IN THE SEX OFFENDER
REGISTRY.
HOWEVER, IT IS
INVOLVED IN THE SEX OFFENDER
REGISTRY.
HOWEVER, IT IS UP
INVOLVED IN THE SEX OFFENDER
REGISTRY.
HOWEVER, IT IS UP TO
INVOLVED IN THE SEX OFFENDER
REGISTRY.
HOWEVER, IT IS UP TO A
INVOLVED IN THE SEX OFFENDER
REGISTRY.
HOWEVER, IT IS UP TO A JUDGE
INVOLVED IN THE SEX OFFENDER
REGISTRY.
HOWEVER, IT IS UP TO A JUDGE TO
REGISTRY.
HOWEVER, IT IS UP TO A JUDGE TO
REGISTRY.
HOWEVER, IT IS UP TO A JUDGE TO
DECIDE.
HOWEVER, IT IS UP TO A JUDGE TO
DECIDE.
HOWEVER, IT IS UP TO A JUDGE TO
DECIDE.
WHAT
HOWEVER, IT IS UP TO A JUDGE TO
DECIDE.
WHAT SB145
HOWEVER, IT IS UP TO A JUDGE TO
DECIDE.
WHAT SB145 DOES
HOWEVER, IT IS UP TO A JUDGE TO
DECIDE.
WHAT SB145 DOES IS
HOWEVER, IT IS UP TO A JUDGE TO
DECIDE.
WHAT SB145 DOES IS GIVES
HOWEVER, IT IS UP TO A JUDGE TO
DECIDE.
WHAT SB145 DOES IS GIVES JUDGES
DECIDE.
WHAT SB145 DOES IS GIVES JUDGES
DECIDE.
WHAT SB145 DOES IS GIVES JUDGES
THAT
DECIDE.
WHAT SB145 DOES IS GIVES JUDGES
THAT DISCRETION
DECIDE.
WHAT SB145 DOES IS GIVES JUDGES
THAT DISCRETION IN
DECIDE.
WHAT SB145 DOES IS GIVES JUDGES
THAT DISCRETION IN ALL
DECIDE.
WHAT SB145 DOES IS GIVES JUDGES
THAT DISCRETION IN ALL CASES
WHAT SB145 DOES IS GIVES JUDGES
THAT DISCRETION IN ALL CASES
WHAT SB145 DOES IS GIVES JUDGES
THAT DISCRETION IN ALL CASES
REGARDLESS
WHAT SB145 DOES IS GIVES JUDGES
THAT DISCRETION IN ALL CASES
REGARDLESS OF
WHAT SB145 DOES IS GIVES JUDGES
THAT DISCRETION IN ALL CASES
REGARDLESS OF THE
WHAT SB145 DOES IS GIVES JUDGES
THAT DISCRETION IN ALL CASES
REGARDLESS OF THE KIND.
THAT DISCRETION IN ALL CASES
REGARDLESS OF THE KIND.
THAT DISCRETION IN ALL CASES
REGARDLESS OF THE KIND.
THE
THAT DISCRETION IN ALL CASES
REGARDLESS OF THE KIND.
THE BILL
THAT DISCRETION IN ALL CASES
REGARDLESS OF THE KIND.
THE BILL HAS
THAT DISCRETION IN ALL CASES
REGARDLESS OF THE KIND.
THE BILL HAS IGNITED
THAT DISCRETION IN ALL CASES
REGARDLESS OF THE KIND.
THE BILL HAS IGNITED LOTS
THAT DISCRETION IN ALL CASES
REGARDLESS OF THE KIND.
THE BILL HAS IGNITED LOTS OF
REGARDLESS OF THE KIND.
THE BILL HAS IGNITED LOTS OF
REGARDLESS OF THE KIND.
THE BILL HAS IGNITED LOTS OF
COMMENTS
REGARDLESS OF THE KIND.
THE BILL HAS IGNITED LOTS OF
COMMENTS ON
REGARDLESS OF THE KIND.
THE BILL HAS IGNITED LOTS OF
COMMENTS ON THEIR
REGARDLESS OF THE KIND.
THE BILL HAS IGNITED LOTS OF
COMMENTS ON THEIR FACEBOOK
THE BILL HAS IGNITED LOTS OF
COMMENTS ON THEIR FACEBOOK
THE BILL HAS IGNITED LOTS OF
COMMENTS ON THEIR FACEBOOK
PAGES.
COMMENTS ON THEIR FACEBOOK
PAGES.
COMMENTS ON THEIR FACEBOOK
PAGES.
COMMENTS
COMMENTS ON THEIR FACEBOOK
PAGES.
COMMENTS HIKE
COMMENTS ON THEIR FACEBOOK
PAGES.
COMMENTS HIKE THESE
COMMENTS ON THEIR FACEBOOK
PAGES.
COMMENTS HIKE THESE ARE
COMMENTS ON THEIR FACEBOOK
PAGES.
COMMENTS HIKE THESE ARE SAYING
PAGES.
COMMENTS HIKE THESE ARE SAYING
PAGES.
COMMENTS HIKE THESE ARE SAYING
THAT
PAGES.
COMMENTS HIKE THESE ARE SAYING
THAT THE
PAGES.
COMMENTS HIKE THESE ARE SAYING
THAT THE BILL
PAGES.
COMMENTS HIKE THESE ARE SAYING
THAT THE BILL WOULD
PAGES.
COMMENTS HIKE THESE ARE SAYING
THAT THE BILL WOULD MAKE
PAGES.
COMMENTS HIKE THESE ARE SAYING
THAT THE BILL WOULD MAKE IT
PAGES.
COMMENTS HIKE THESE ARE SAYING
THAT THE BILL WOULD MAKE IT SO
COMMENTS HIKE THESE ARE SAYING
THAT THE BILL WOULD MAKE IT SO
COMMENTS HIKE THESE ARE SAYING
THAT THE BILL WOULD MAKE IT SO
AN
COMMENTS HIKE THESE ARE SAYING
THAT THE BILL WOULD MAKE IT SO
AN 18-YEAR-OLD
COMMENTS HIKE THESE ARE SAYING
THAT THE BILL WOULD MAKE IT SO
AN 18-YEAR-OLD COULD
COMMENTS HIKE THESE ARE SAYING
THAT THE BILL WOULD MAKE IT SO
AN 18-YEAR-OLD COULD RAPE
COMMENTS HIKE THESE ARE SAYING
THAT THE BILL WOULD MAKE IT SO
AN 18-YEAR-OLD COULD RAPE AN
COMMENTS HIKE THESE ARE SAYING
THAT THE BILL WOULD MAKE IT SO
AN 18-YEAR-OLD COULD RAPE AN 8-
THAT THE BILL WOULD MAKE IT SO
AN 18-YEAR-OLD COULD RAPE AN 8-
THAT THE BILL WOULD MAKE IT SO
AN 18-YEAR-OLD COULD RAPE AN 8-
YEAR-OLD.
AN 18-YEAR-OLD COULD RAPE AN 8-
YEAR-OLD.
AN 18-YEAR-OLD COULD RAPE AN 8-
YEAR-OLD.
>>
AN 18-YEAR-OLD COULD RAPE AN 8-
YEAR-OLD.
>> THIS
AN 18-YEAR-OLD COULD RAPE AN 8-
YEAR-OLD.
>> THIS BILL
AN 18-YEAR-OLD COULD RAPE AN 8-
YEAR-OLD.
>> THIS BILL HAS
AN 18-YEAR-OLD COULD RAPE AN 8-
YEAR-OLD.
>> THIS BILL HAS NO
AN 18-YEAR-OLD COULD RAPE AN 8-
YEAR-OLD.
>> THIS BILL HAS NO APPLICATION
YEAR-OLD.
>> THIS BILL HAS NO APPLICATION
YEAR-OLD.
>> THIS BILL HAS NO APPLICATION
TO
YEAR-OLD.
>> THIS BILL HAS NO APPLICATION
TO ANYONE
YEAR-OLD.
>> THIS BILL HAS NO APPLICATION
TO ANYONE UNDER
YEAR-OLD.
>> THIS BILL HAS NO APPLICATION
TO ANYONE UNDER THE
YEAR-OLD.
>> THIS BILL HAS NO APPLICATION
TO ANYONE UNDER THE AGE
YEAR-OLD.
>> THIS BILL HAS NO APPLICATION
TO ANYONE UNDER THE AGE OF
YEAR-OLD.
>> THIS BILL HAS NO APPLICATION
TO ANYONE UNDER THE AGE OF 14.
>> THIS BILL HAS NO APPLICATION
TO ANYONE UNDER THE AGE OF 14.
>> THIS BILL HAS NO APPLICATION
TO ANYONE UNDER THE AGE OF 14.
>>
>> THIS BILL HAS NO APPLICATION
TO ANYONE UNDER THE AGE OF 14.
>> Reporter:
>> THIS BILL HAS NO APPLICATION
TO ANYONE UNDER THE AGE OF 14.
>> Reporter: DESPITE
>> THIS BILL HAS NO APPLICATION
TO ANYONE UNDER THE AGE OF 14.
>> Reporter: DESPITE THE
>> THIS BILL HAS NO APPLICATION
TO ANYONE UNDER THE AGE OF 14.
>> Reporter: DESPITE THE DEATH
TO ANYONE UNDER THE AGE OF 14.
>> Reporter: DESPITE THE DEATH
TO ANYONE UNDER THE AGE OF 14.
>> Reporter: DESPITE THE DEATH
THREATS
TO ANYONE UNDER THE AGE OF 14.
>> Reporter: DESPITE THE DEATH
THREATS AND
TO ANYONE UNDER THE AGE OF 14.
>> Reporter: DESPITE THE DEATH
THREATS AND THE
TO ANYONE UNDER THE AGE OF 14.
>> Reporter: DESPITE THE DEATH
THREATS AND THE NEGATIVE
>> Reporter: DESPITE THE DEATH
THREATS AND THE NEGATIVE
>> Reporter: DESPITE THE DEATH
THREATS AND THE NEGATIVE
COMMENTS
>> Reporter: DESPITE THE DEATH
THREATS AND THE NEGATIVE
COMMENTS THAT
>> Reporter: DESPITE THE DEATH
THREATS AND THE NEGATIVE
COMMENTS THAT ARE
>> Reporter: DESPITE THE DEATH
THREATS AND THE NEGATIVE
COMMENTS THAT ARE DIRECTED
THREATS AND THE NEGATIVE
COMMENTS THAT ARE DIRECTED
THREATS AND THE NEGATIVE
COMMENTS THAT ARE DIRECTED
TOWARDS
THREATS AND THE NEGATIVE
COMMENTS THAT ARE DIRECTED
TOWARDS WEINER,
THREATS AND THE NEGATIVE
COMMENTS THAT ARE DIRECTED
TOWARDS WEINER, HIS
THREATS AND THE NEGATIVE
COMMENTS THAT ARE DIRECTED
TOWARDS WEINER, HIS BILL
COMMENTS THAT ARE DIRECTED
TOWARDS WEINER, HIS BILL
