>>>
>>> WELCOME
>>> WELCOME BACK.
>>> WELCOME BACK.
IT
>>> WELCOME BACK.
IT WAS
>>> WELCOME BACK.
IT WAS A
>>> WELCOME BACK.
IT WAS A CASE
>>> WELCOME BACK.
IT WAS A CASE THAT
>>> WELCOME BACK.
IT WAS A CASE THAT STEMMED
>>> WELCOME BACK.
IT WAS A CASE THAT STEMMED FROM
IT WAS A CASE THAT STEMMED FROM
IT WAS A CASE THAT STEMMED FROM
EIGHT
IT WAS A CASE THAT STEMMED FROM
EIGHT SHOPLIFTING
IT WAS A CASE THAT STEMMED FROM
EIGHT SHOPLIFTING ALLEGATION
EIGHT SHOPLIFTING ALLEGATION
EIGHT SHOPLIFTING ALLEGATION
AND
EIGHT SHOPLIFTING ALLEGATION
AND LED
EIGHT SHOPLIFTING ALLEGATION
AND LED TO
EIGHT SHOPLIFTING ALLEGATION
AND LED TO SEVERAL
EIGHT SHOPLIFTING ALLEGATION
AND LED TO SEVERAL MONTHS
EIGHT SHOPLIFTING ALLEGATION
AND LED TO SEVERAL MONTHS OF
AND LED TO SEVERAL MONTHS OF
AND LED TO SEVERAL MONTHS OF
PROTESTS
AND LED TO SEVERAL MONTHS OF
PROTESTS IN
AND LED TO SEVERAL MONTHS OF
PROTESTS IN A
AND LED TO SEVERAL MONTHS OF
PROTESTS IN A SMALL
AND LED TO SEVERAL MONTHS OF
PROTESTS IN A SMALL OHIO
PROTESTS IN A SMALL OHIO
PROTESTS IN A SMALL OHIO
COLLEGE
PROTESTS IN A SMALL OHIO
COLLEGE TOWN.
COLLEGE TOWN.
COLLEGE TOWN.
NOW
COLLEGE TOWN.
NOW A
COLLEGE TOWN.
NOW A BAKERY
COLLEGE TOWN.
NOW A BAKERY HAS
COLLEGE TOWN.
NOW A BAKERY HAS BEEN
COLLEGE TOWN.
NOW A BAKERY HAS BEEN AWARDED
NOW A BAKERY HAS BEEN AWARDED
NOW A BAKERY HAS BEEN AWARDED
$11
NOW A BAKERY HAS BEEN AWARDED
$11 MILLION
NOW A BAKERY HAS BEEN AWARDED
$11 MILLION IN
NOW A BAKERY HAS BEEN AWARDED
$11 MILLION IN DAMAGES
NOW A BAKERY HAS BEEN AWARDED
$11 MILLION IN DAMAGES IN
NOW A BAKERY HAS BEEN AWARDED
$11 MILLION IN DAMAGES IN A
$11 MILLION IN DAMAGES IN A
$11 MILLION IN DAMAGES IN A
LAWSUIT
$11 MILLION IN DAMAGES IN A
LAWSUIT AGAINST
$11 MILLION IN DAMAGES IN A
LAWSUIT AGAINST OBERLIN
$11 MILLION IN DAMAGES IN A
LAWSUIT AGAINST OBERLIN COLLEGE.
LAWSUIT AGAINST OBERLIN COLLEGE.
LAWSUIT AGAINST OBERLIN COLLEGE.
AND
LAWSUIT AGAINST OBERLIN COLLEGE.
AND AT
LAWSUIT AGAINST OBERLIN COLLEGE.
AND AT ABRAHAM
LAWSUIT AGAINST OBERLIN COLLEGE.
AND AT ABRAHAM HAS
LAWSUIT AGAINST OBERLIN COLLEGE.
AND AT ABRAHAM HAS DETAILS.
AND AT ABRAHAM HAS DETAILS.
AND AT ABRAHAM HAS DETAILS.
>>
AND AT ABRAHAM HAS DETAILS.
>> Reporter:
AND AT ABRAHAM HAS DETAILS.
>> Reporter: THE
AND AT ABRAHAM HAS DETAILS.
>> Reporter: THE COURT
AND AT ABRAHAM HAS DETAILS.
>> Reporter: THE COURT BATTLE
>> Reporter: THE COURT BATTLE
>> Reporter: THE COURT BATTLE
BETWEEN
>> Reporter: THE COURT BATTLE
BETWEEN GIBSON
>> Reporter: THE COURT BATTLE
BETWEEN GIBSON AND
>> Reporter: THE COURT BATTLE
BETWEEN GIBSON AND OBERLIN
BETWEEN GIBSON AND OBERLIN
BETWEEN GIBSON AND OBERLIN
COLLEGE
BETWEEN GIBSON AND OBERLIN
COLLEGE HAS
BETWEEN GIBSON AND OBERLIN
COLLEGE HAS BEEN
BETWEEN GIBSON AND OBERLIN
COLLEGE HAS BEEN GOING
BETWEEN GIBSON AND OBERLIN
COLLEGE HAS BEEN GOING ON
BETWEEN GIBSON AND OBERLIN
COLLEGE HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR
BETWEEN GIBSON AND OBERLIN
COLLEGE HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR A
COLLEGE HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR A
COLLEGE HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR A
FEW
COLLEGE HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR A
FEW YEARS
COLLEGE HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR A
FEW YEARS NOW.
FEW YEARS NOW.
FEW YEARS NOW.
IT
FEW YEARS NOW.
IT ALL
FEW YEARS NOW.
IT ALL STARTED
FEW YEARS NOW.
IT ALL STARTED WHEN
FEW YEARS NOW.
IT ALL STARTED WHEN PROTESTERS
IT ALL STARTED WHEN PROTESTERS
IT ALL STARTED WHEN PROTESTERS
TOOK
IT ALL STARTED WHEN PROTESTERS
TOOK TO
IT ALL STARTED WHEN PROTESTERS
TOOK TO THE
IT ALL STARTED WHEN PROTESTERS
TOOK TO THE STREET.
TOOK TO THE STREET.
TOOK TO THE STREET.
IT
TOOK TO THE STREET.
IT WAS
TOOK TO THE STREET.
IT WAS A
TOOK TO THE STREET.
IT WAS A CALL
TOOK TO THE STREET.
IT WAS A CALL FOR
TOOK TO THE STREET.
IT WAS A CALL FOR BOYCOTTS
TOOK TO THE STREET.
IT WAS A CALL FOR BOYCOTTS THAT
IT WAS A CALL FOR BOYCOTTS THAT
IT WAS A CALL FOR BOYCOTTS THAT
BEGAN
IT WAS A CALL FOR BOYCOTTS THAT
BEGAN A
IT WAS A CALL FOR BOYCOTTS THAT
BEGAN A YEARS
IT WAS A CALL FOR BOYCOTTS THAT
BEGAN A YEARS LONG
IT WAS A CALL FOR BOYCOTTS THAT
BEGAN A YEARS LONG BATTLE.
BEGAN A YEARS LONG BATTLE.
BEGAN A YEARS LONG BATTLE.
IT
BEGAN A YEARS LONG BATTLE.
IT CAME
BEGAN A YEARS LONG BATTLE.
IT CAME AFTER
BEGAN A YEARS LONG BATTLE.
IT CAME AFTER A
BEGAN A YEARS LONG BATTLE.
IT CAME AFTER A SHOPLIFTING
IT CAME AFTER A SHOPLIFTING
IT CAME AFTER A SHOPLIFTING
INCIDENT
IT CAME AFTER A SHOPLIFTING
INCIDENT INSIDE
IT CAME AFTER A SHOPLIFTING
INCIDENT INSIDE THE
IT CAME AFTER A SHOPLIFTING
INCIDENT INSIDE THE BAKERY
IT CAME AFTER A SHOPLIFTING
INCIDENT INSIDE THE BAKERY ON
INCIDENT INSIDE THE BAKERY ON
INCIDENT INSIDE THE BAKERY ON
CAMPUS.
CAMPUS.
CAMPUS.
STUDENT
CAMPUS.
STUDENT PROTESTERS
CAMPUS.
STUDENT PROTESTERS MADE
CAMPUS.
STUDENT PROTESTERS MADE CLAIMS
STUDENT PROTESTERS MADE CLAIMS
STUDENT PROTESTERS MADE CLAIMS
OF
STUDENT PROTESTERS MADE CLAIMS
OF RACIAL
STUDENT PROTESTERS MADE CLAIMS
OF RACIAL PROFILING
STUDENT PROTESTERS MADE CLAIMS
OF RACIAL PROFILING AFTER
STUDENT PROTESTERS MADE CLAIMS
OF RACIAL PROFILING AFTER A
OF RACIAL PROFILING AFTER A
OF RACIAL PROFILING AFTER A
WHITE
OF RACIAL PROFILING AFTER A
WHITE EMPLOYEE
OF RACIAL PROFILING AFTER A
WHITE EMPLOYEE CONFRONTED
OF RACIAL PROFILING AFTER A
WHITE EMPLOYEE CONFRONTED EIGHT
WHITE EMPLOYEE CONFRONTED EIGHT
WHITE EMPLOYEE CONFRONTED EIGHT
BLACK
WHITE EMPLOYEE CONFRONTED EIGHT
BLACK STUDENT,
WHITE EMPLOYEE CONFRONTED EIGHT
BLACK STUDENT, SUSPECTING
WHITE EMPLOYEE CONFRONTED EIGHT
BLACK STUDENT, SUSPECTING HIM
BLACK STUDENT, SUSPECTING HIM
BLACK STUDENT, SUSPECTING HIM
SHOPLIFTING.
SHOPLIFTING.
SHOPLIFTING.
ACCORDING
SHOPLIFTING.
ACCORDING TO
SHOPLIFTING.
ACCORDING TO THE
SHOPLIFTING.
ACCORDING TO THE POLICE
SHOPLIFTING.
ACCORDING TO THE POLICE REPORT,
ACCORDING TO THE POLICE REPORT,
ACCORDING TO THE POLICE REPORT,
TWO
ACCORDING TO THE POLICE REPORT,
TWO OTHER
ACCORDING TO THE POLICE REPORT,
TWO OTHER STUDENTS
ACCORDING TO THE POLICE REPORT,
TWO OTHER STUDENTS GOT
ACCORDING TO THE POLICE REPORT,
TWO OTHER STUDENTS GOT INVOLVED
TWO OTHER STUDENTS GOT INVOLVED
TWO OTHER STUDENTS GOT INVOLVED
AND
TWO OTHER STUDENTS GOT INVOLVED
AND ASSAULT
TWO OTHER STUDENTS GOT INVOLVED
AND ASSAULT OF
TWO OTHER STUDENTS GOT INVOLVED
AND ASSAULT OF THE
TWO OTHER STUDENTS GOT INVOLVED
AND ASSAULT OF THE EMPLOYEE.
AND ASSAULT OF THE EMPLOYEE.
AND ASSAULT OF THE EMPLOYEE.
ALL
AND ASSAULT OF THE EMPLOYEE.
ALL THREE
AND ASSAULT OF THE EMPLOYEE.
ALL THREE STUDENTS
AND ASSAULT OF THE EMPLOYEE.
ALL THREE STUDENTS LATER
AND ASSAULT OF THE EMPLOYEE.
ALL THREE STUDENTS LATER PLED
ALL THREE STUDENTS LATER PLED
ALL THREE STUDENTS LATER PLED
GUILTY
ALL THREE STUDENTS LATER PLED
GUILTY TO
ALL THREE STUDENTS LATER PLED
GUILTY TO MISDEMEANORS
ALL THREE STUDENTS LATER PLED
GUILTY TO MISDEMEANORS AND
ALL THREE STUDENTS LATER PLED
GUILTY TO MISDEMEANORS AND READ
GUILTY TO MISDEMEANORS AND READ
GUILTY TO MISDEMEANORS AND READ
STATEMENTS
GUILTY TO MISDEMEANORS AND READ
STATEMENTS IN
GUILTY TO MISDEMEANORS AND READ
STATEMENTS IN COURT
GUILTY TO MISDEMEANORS AND READ
STATEMENTS IN COURT SAYING
GUILTY TO MISDEMEANORS AND READ
STATEMENTS IN COURT SAYING THAT
STATEMENTS IN COURT SAYING THAT
STATEMENTS IN COURT SAYING THAT
THE
STATEMENTS IN COURT SAYING THAT
THE ACTIONS
STATEMENTS IN COURT SAYING THAT
THE ACTIONS WERE
STATEMENTS IN COURT SAYING THAT
THE ACTIONS WERE NOT
STATEMENTS IN COURT SAYING THAT
THE ACTIONS WERE NOT RACIALLY
THE ACTIONS WERE NOT RACIALLY
THE ACTIONS WERE NOT RACIALLY
MOTIVATED.
MOTIVATED.
MOTIVATED.
THE
MOTIVATED.
THE ALLEGATIONS
MOTIVATED.
THE ALLEGATIONS OF
MOTIVATED.
THE ALLEGATIONS OF RACISM
THE ALLEGATIONS OF RACISM
THE ALLEGATIONS OF RACISM
SPARKED
THE ALLEGATIONS OF RACISM
SPARKED BY
THE ALLEGATIONS OF RACISM
SPARKED BY THE
THE ALLEGATIONS OF RACISM
SPARKED BY THE INCIDENT
THE ALLEGATIONS OF RACISM
SPARKED BY THE INCIDENT LED
THE ALLEGATIONS OF RACISM
SPARKED BY THE INCIDENT LED TO
SPARKED BY THE INCIDENT LED TO
SPARKED BY THE INCIDENT LED TO
PROTEST
SPARKED BY THE INCIDENT LED TO
PROTEST AND
SPARKED BY THE INCIDENT LED TO
PROTEST AND CALLS
SPARKED BY THE INCIDENT LED TO
PROTEST AND CALLS FOR
SPARKED BY THE INCIDENT LED TO
PROTEST AND CALLS FOR A
PROTEST AND CALLS FOR A
PROTEST AND CALLS FOR A
BOYCOTT.
BOYCOTT.
BOYCOTT.
LATER,
BOYCOTT.
LATER, THE
BOYCOTT.
LATER, THE BAKERY
BOYCOTT.
LATER, THE BAKERY FILED
BOYCOTT.
LATER, THE BAKERY FILED A
LATER, THE BAKERY FILED A
LATER, THE BAKERY FILED A
LAWSUIT.
LAWSUIT.
LAWSUIT.
THE
LAWSUIT.
THE BAKERY
LAWSUIT.
THE BAKERY HAD
LAWSUIT.
THE BAKERY HAD TIES
LAWSUIT.
THE BAKERY HAD TIES WITH
THE BAKERY HAD TIES WITH
THE BAKERY HAD TIES WITH
OBERLIN
THE BAKERY HAD TIES WITH
OBERLIN COLLEGE
THE BAKERY HAD TIES WITH
OBERLIN COLLEGE AND
THE BAKERY HAD TIES WITH
OBERLIN COLLEGE AND CLAIMED
THE BAKERY HAD TIES WITH
OBERLIN COLLEGE AND CLAIMED IN
OBERLIN COLLEGE AND CLAIMED IN
OBERLIN COLLEGE AND CLAIMED IN
THE
OBERLIN COLLEGE AND CLAIMED IN
THE LAWSUIT
OBERLIN COLLEGE AND CLAIMED IN
THE LAWSUIT THAT
OBERLIN COLLEGE AND CLAIMED IN
THE LAWSUIT THAT THE
OBERLIN COLLEGE AND CLAIMED IN
THE LAWSUIT THAT THE COLLEGE
THE LAWSUIT THAT THE COLLEGE
THE LAWSUIT THAT THE COLLEGE
STOPPED
THE LAWSUIT THAT THE COLLEGE
STOPPED WORKING
THE LAWSUIT THAT THE COLLEGE
STOPPED WORKING WITH
THE LAWSUIT THAT THE COLLEGE
STOPPED WORKING WITH THE
THE LAWSUIT THAT THE COLLEGE
STOPPED WORKING WITH THE BAKERY
STOPPED WORKING WITH THE BAKERY
STOPPED WORKING WITH THE BAKERY
AFTER
STOPPED WORKING WITH THE BAKERY
AFTER THE
STOPPED WORKING WITH THE BAKERY
AFTER THE PROTEST.
AFTER THE PROTEST.
AFTER THE PROTEST.
THEY
AFTER THE PROTEST.
THEY SAY
AFTER THE PROTEST.
THEY SAY THAT
AFTER THE PROTEST.
THEY SAY THAT THE
AFTER THE PROTEST.
THEY SAY THAT THE UNIVERSITY
THEY SAY THAT THE UNIVERSITY
THEY SAY THAT THE UNIVERSITY
INTERFERED
THEY SAY THAT THE UNIVERSITY
INTERFERED WITH
THEY SAY THAT THE UNIVERSITY
INTERFERED WITH BUSINESS
INTERFERED WITH BUSINESS
INTERFERED WITH BUSINESS
RELATIONSHIPS.
RELATIONSHIPS.
RELATIONSHIPS.
THE
RELATIONSHIPS.
THE JURY
RELATIONSHIPS.
THE JURY AWARDED
RELATIONSHIPS.
THE JURY AWARDED THE
RELATIONSHIPS.
THE JURY AWARDED THE BAKERY
RELATIONSHIPS.
THE JURY AWARDED THE BAKERY $11
THE JURY AWARDED THE BAKERY $11
THE JURY AWARDED THE BAKERY $11
MILLION
THE JURY AWARDED THE BAKERY $11
MILLION IN
THE JURY AWARDED THE BAKERY $11
MILLION IN DAMAGES.
MILLION IN DAMAGES.
MILLION IN DAMAGES.
THERE
MILLION IN DAMAGES.
THERE IS
MILLION IN DAMAGES.
THERE IS A
MILLION IN DAMAGES.
THERE IS A POTENTIAL
MILLION IN DAMAGES.
THERE IS A POTENTIAL FOR
MILLION IN DAMAGES.
THERE IS A POTENTIAL FOR MORE
THERE IS A POTENTIAL FOR MORE
THERE IS A POTENTIAL FOR MORE
MONEY
THERE IS A POTENTIAL FOR MORE
MONEY TO
THERE IS A POTENTIAL FOR MORE
MONEY TO BE
THERE IS A POTENTIAL FOR MORE
MONEY TO BE AWARDED
THERE IS A POTENTIAL FOR MORE
MONEY TO BE AWARDED TO
THERE IS A POTENTIAL FOR MORE
MONEY TO BE AWARDED TO THE
MONEY TO BE AWARDED TO THE
MONEY TO BE AWARDED TO THE
BAKERY
MONEY TO BE AWARDED TO THE
BAKERY BECAUSE
MONEY TO BE AWARDED TO THE
BAKERY BECAUSE THEY
MONEY TO BE AWARDED TO THE
BAKERY BECAUSE THEY WILL
MONEY TO BE AWARDED TO THE
BAKERY BECAUSE THEY WILL BE
BAKERY BECAUSE THEY WILL BE
BAKERY BECAUSE THEY WILL BE
LOOKING
BAKERY BECAUSE THEY WILL BE
LOOKING AT
BAKERY BECAUSE THEY WILL BE
LOOKING AT PUNITIVE
BAKERY BECAUSE THEY WILL BE
LOOKING AT PUNITIVE DAMAGES
LOOKING AT PUNITIVE DAMAGES
LOOKING AT PUNITIVE DAMAGES
TOMORROW
LOOKING AT PUNITIVE DAMAGES
TOMORROW AFTERNOON.
