curiosity as to where we are what we are
is it very much more exciting to
discover we're on a ball half of the
stick and upside down it's spinning
around in space as a mysterious force we
told you sir
it's going around the great big blob of
gas that's burning by a fueled by a fire
that's completely different than the
fire any fire we can make but now we can
make that fire nuclear fire no but
that's much more exciting story too many
people then the tales which other people
used to make up who worried about the
universe that we were living on it
back of a potential or something like
that they were wonderful stories but the
truth is so much more remarkable so
what's the pleasure in physics is that
to me is that because it's revealed the
truth - so Leela is so amazing and I
can't I have this disease and many other
people who had studied far enough to
begin to understand a little of how
things worked a fascinated by it and
this fascination drives them on to such
an extent that they've been able to
convince governments and so on to keep
supporting them in this investigation
that the lace is making
water when unmanipulated is to find its
level so whether you look at a cup of
water a bathtub a swimming pool a lake
or the ocean its flat of course natural
motion is not considered and doesn't
equal a curve we have zero authentic
pictures of the earth and they're all
composites and NASA even admits that
they Photoshop Earth images it is
photoshopped but it's it's has to be on
numerous occasions NASA admits that we
can't go beyond low-earth orbit which is
between 99 miles and 1,200 miles away
the interesting thing is that the moon
is said to be two hundred and thirty
eight thousand miles away which is the
difference of two hundred and thirty six
thousand eight hundred miles no matter
if you're on the ground on top of a
building a mountain a hot air balloon an
airplane or looking at high-altitude
amateur balloon footage the horizon
never fails to rise right to your eyes
whether you are looking at Toronto's
skyline from niagara-on-the-lake 31
miles away Chicago's skyline from Union
Pier 43 miles away or even Oahu from
kawaii which is up to a hundred and
eight miles away from Center to Center
or 73 miles away from the closest points
you will not see any curvature where
it's supposed to be according to the
Pythagorean theorem which states that
the curvature of the earth is eight
inches per mile squared
oh ah who should not be visible
whatsoever but you can see the whole
thing in 1887 Albert Michelson and
Edward Morley conducted what's known as
the Michelson Morley experiment this
experiment was attempting to proof the
speculated motion of the earth around
the Sun and when it failed Albert
Einstein was forced to form the theory
of relativity to overcome this problem
in fact any time mainstream science is
faced with undesirable results they
create a workaround which isn't real
science at all
the Sun is claimed to be 93 million
miles away with the radius of over
400,000 miles but can easily be proven
to be much closer and smaller by tracing
the crepuscular rays back to its origin
in the sky if the Sun were indeed 93
million miles away it would simply be
impossible to have angled sun rays as
they should all consistently come in
straight according to the globular
Theory a lunar eclipse occurs when the
Sun Earth and Moon are in a direct line
but it is on record that since about the
15th century over 50 eclipses have
occurred while both the Sun and Moon are
visible above the horizon FH cook the
terrestrial plane it's a common
misconception that the shadow of the
earth causes moon phases even the
pastors and priests of the science
religion readily admit this fact the
interesting thing about moon phases is
that they are always the exact same
eight phases repeated but if we were
circling around the Sun these eight
phases would inevitably be reversed from
the summer to winter seasons I
completely understand that the idea of a
flattened stationary earth seems
ridiculous in many ways but that's only
because we are taught the false globe
model from the very first time that we
enter a school classroom not to mention
the first time we are introduced to the
concept of a Flat Earth
it's depicted as a highly laughable
world where ships boats and water would
run off of the edge so I do get it but
it's all part of the deception I've
spent 30 years of my life believing that
we were on a spinning globe
it wasn't until I unbiased ly and
scientifically investigated the Flat
Earth claims that I started to realize
that there is more to this theory than I
originally gave it credit for now after
almost two years of research uncertain
that the earth is flat we are told that
the Earth spins at 1040 miles per hour
while the earth travels around the Sun
at 66,000 miles per hour meanwhile the
whole solar system is going inside the
Milky Way galaxy at a speed of four
hundred and ninety thousand miles per
hour and finally the entire Milky Way
galaxy is starting through infinite
space at over 1 million miles per hour
most people believe this and yet every
experiment ever conducted to prove even
the simple spin of the earth has failed
the same thing goes for curvature it's
never been proven and the only time we
see it is in movies
NASA CGI or when we're looking through a
distorted fisheye lens with all that
said please continue to research
critically and don't be afraid to ask
reasonable questions and speak out
Newton theorized and it is now commonly
taught that the Earth's ocean tides are
caused by gravitational lunar attraction
if the moon is only 2160 miles in
diameter and the earth eight thousand
miles
however using their own math and law it
follows that the earth is 87 times more
massive and therefore the larger object
should attract the smaller to it and not
the other way around if the Earth's
greater gravity is what keeps the moon
in orbit it is impossible for the moon's
lesser gravity to supersede the Earth's
gravity at Earth's sea level where its
gravitational attraction would even
further out trump the moon's not to
mention the velocity and path of the
moon are uniform and should therefore
exert a uniform influence on the Earth's
tides when in actuality the Earth's
tides vary greatly
furthermore if ocean tides are caused by
the moon's gravitation how is it that
lakes ponds and other smaller bodies of
standing water remain outside the moon's
grasp while the gigantic oceans are so
affected Thomas Winship wrote if the
moon lifted up the water it is evident
that near the land the water would be
drawn away and low instead of high tide
caused again the velocity and path of
the moon are uniform and it follows that
if she exerted any influence on the
earth that influence can only be a
uniform influence but the tides are not
uniform at port natal the rise and fall
is about six feet while at Bera about
six hundred miles up the coast the rise
and fall is 26 feet this effectually
settles the matter that the moon has no
influence on the tides tides are caused
by the gentle and gradual rise and fall
of the earth on the bosom of the mighty
deep in inland lakes there are no tides
which also proves that the moon cannot
attract either the earth or water to
cause tides but the fact that the basin
of the lake is on the earth which rests
on the waters of the deep shows that no
tides are
possible as the waters of the lakes
together with the earth rise and fall
and thus the tides of the coast are
caused while there are no tides on
waters unconnected with the sea David
Ward law Scott wrote even Sir Isaac
Newton himself confessed that the
explanation of the moon's action on the
tides was the least satisfactory part of
his theory of gravitation this theory
asserts that the larger object attracts
the smaller and the mass of the Moon
being reckoned as only 1/8 of that of
the earth it follows that if by the
presumed force of gravitation the Earth
revolves around the Sun much more for
the same reason should the moon do so
likewise instead of which that willful
orb still continues to go round our
world tides vary greatly in height owing
chiefly to the different configurations
of the adjoining lands at chepstow it
rises to 60 feet at Portishead 250 while
at Dublin Bay it is but 12 and at
Wexford only five feet that the earth
itself has a slight tremulous motion may
be seen in the movement of the spirit
level even when fixed as steadily as
possible and that the sea has a
fluctuation may be witnessed by the
oscillation of an anchored ship in the
comest day of summer by what means the
tides are so regularly affected is that
present only conjectured possibly it may
be by atmospheric pressure on the waters
of the great deep and perhaps even the
moon itself as suggested by the late dr.
robot 'm may influence the atmosphere
increasing or diminishing its barometric
pressure and indirectly the rise and
fall of earth in the waters dr. samuel
Rowbotham wrote it is affirmed that the
intensity of attraction increases with
proximity and vice versa
how then when the waters are drawn up by
the moon from their bed and away from
the Earth's attraction which at that
greater distance from the center is
considerably diminished while that of
the moon is proportionally increased is
it possible that all the waters acted on
should be prevented leaving the earth
and flying away to the moon if the moon
has power of Attraction sufficient to
lift the waters of the earth at all even
a single inch from their deepest
receptacles where the Earth's attraction
is much the greater
there is nothing in the theory of
attraction of gravitation to prevent her
taking to herself all the waters which
come within her influence let the
smaller body once overcome the power of
the larger and the power of the smaller
becomes greater than when it first
operated because the matter acted on is
now nearer to it proximity is greater
and therefore power is greater how then
can the waters of the ocean immediately
underneath the Moon flow towards the
shores and so cause a flood tide water
flows it is said through the law of
gravity or attraction of the Earth's
center it is possible then for the moon
having months overcome the power of the
earth to let go her hold upon the waters
through the influence of a power which
she has conquered and which therefore is
less than her own the above and other
difficulties which exist in connection
with the explanation of the tides
afforded by the Newtonian system have
led many including Sir Isaac Newton
himself to admit that such explanation
is the least satisfactory portion of the
theory of gravitation thus we have been
carried forward by the sheer force of
evidence to the conclusion that the
tides of the sea do not arise from the
attraction of the moon but simply from
the rising and falling of the floating
earth and the waters of the great deep
that calmness which is found to exist at
the bottom of the great seas could not
be possible if the waters were
alternately raised by the moon and
pulled down by the earth bearing this
fact in mind that there exists a
continual pressure of the atmosphere
upon the earth and associating it with
the fact that the earth is a vast plain
stretched out upon the waters and it
will be seen that it must of necessity
slightly fluctuate or slowly rise and
fall in the water as by the action of
the atmosphere the earth is slowly
depressed the water moves towards the
receiving shore and produces the flood
tide and when by the reaction of the
resisting oceanic medium the earth
gradually ascends and the waters recede
and the ebb tide is produced this is the
general cause of tides whatever
peculiarities are observable they may be
traced to the reaction of channels bays
headlands and other local causes that
the earth has a vibratory or tremulous
motion such as must necessarily belong
to a floating and fluctuating structure
is abundantly proved by the experience
of astronomers and surveyors if a
delicate spirit
we'll be firmly placed upon a rock or
upon the most solid foundation which it
is possible to construct the very
curious phenomenon will be observed of
constant change in the position of the
air bubble however carefully the level
may be adjusted and the instrument
protected from the atmosphere the bubble
will maintain its position many seconds
together a somewhat similar influence
has been noticed in astronomical
observatories where instruments of the
best construction are placed in the most
approved positions and cannot always be
relied upon
without occasional readjustment if the
moon pulled the tides due to its alleged
gravity then why does it only pull the
ocean's water and not all the world's
lakes marshes ponds and other inland
waters the tides are clearly a product
of the interconnected ocean waters and
not the other waters of earth and
therefore caused either by the gentle
rocking of the earth on the great deep
as stated by the above 19th century
authors or if more ancient explorers can
be trusted the ocean tides very well may
be caused by a huge whirlpool vortex
surrounding Mount Meru at the North Pole
which reverses direction every six hours
alternately sucking in and pushing out
the great seas of the earth like the
breath of gaia at the navel centre point
of earth breathing in and out twice per
day the 14th century writings inventio
Fortunato by Nicholas Stalin and the
iton areum of Jacobus snow Ian mentioned
the Magnetic Mountain being so powerful
that it pulled the nails right out of
explorers boats the encircling whirlpool
and four directional rivers surrounding
the mountain were said to change every
six hours causing the tides comparing
them to the breath of God at the navel
of the earth inhaling and exhaling the
great seas the cartographer Gerard is
marketer's 16th century map informs us
that the waters of the oceans are
carried northward to the pole through
these rivers with great force such that
no wind could make a ship sail against
the current the waters then disappear
into an enormous whirlpool beneath the
mountain at the pole
and are absorbed into the bowels of the
earth when Gerard is marketers map he
wrote a monstrous Gulf in the sea
towards which from all sides the billows
of the sea coming from remote parts
converge and run together as though
brought there by a conduit pouring into
these mysterious abyss 'as of nature
they are as though devoured thereby and
should it happen that a vessel passed
there it is seized and drawn away with
such powerful violence of the waves that
this hungry force immediately swallows
it up never to appear again Fridtjof
Nansen has found mentions of a great
northern whirlpool in norse legends of
the world's well vel goomar which causes
the tides by pushing and pulling waters
through its subterranean channels
Isidore of Seville the Gesta hem
abiogenesis ecclesia pontifical the
topography ax Hibernia
of joy Aldous Kemp rensis his
description of the northern whirlpool is
cited by Mercator the historian or Vega
the speculum regale of I&R Gunnarsson in
a particularly interesting quote from
the langa bard author Paulus Juana
Freedy also called diaconis States and
not far from the shore which we before
spoke of on the west where the ocean
extends without bounds is that very deep
abyss of waters which we commonly called
the ocean's navel it is said twice a day
to suck the waves into itself and to
spew them out again as is proved to
happen along all these coasts where the
waves rush in and go back again with
fearful rapidity by the whirlpool of
which we have spoken it is asserted that
ships are often drawn in with such
rapidity that they seem to resemble the
flight of arrows through the air and
sometimes they are lost in the Gulf with
a very frightful destruction often just
as they are about to go under they are
brought back again by a sudden shock of
the waves and they are sent out again
thence with the same rapidity with which
they were drawn in the guest ahem abhar
genesis ecclesia Pontifical states that
Archbishop Adelbert told a team of noble
men of Frisia around 10:35 to 10:43 to
set
fail to explore the north polar region
as they headed north beyond Greenland
quote of a sudden they fell into that
numbing oceans dark mist which could
hardly be penetrated with the eyes and
behold the current of the fluctuating
ocean world back to its mysterious
Fountainhead and with most furious
impetuosity Jude the unhappy sailors who
in their despair now thought only of
death on to chaos this they say is the
abysmal chasm that deep in which report
has it that all the back flow of the sea
which appears to decrease is absorbed
and in turn Reve ommited as the mounting
fluctuation is usually described as the
partners were imploring the mercy of God
to receive their souls the backward
thrust of the sea carried away some of
their ships but its forward ejection
through the rest far behind the others
freed thus by the timely help of God
from the instant peril they had had
before their eyes they seconded the
flood by rowing with all their might so
in short what is the cause of the tides
well it is clearly not the supposed
gravity of the moon a smaller object
than the earth far away from the earth
somehow pulling the tides up in a
uniform way as this doesn't happen
alternately it could be as Samuel
Rowbotham proposed that it is simply the
gentle fluctuation of the earth on the
waters of the great deep causing the
tides however this explanation alone
fails to provide an answer for the
regularity of tides coming in every six
hours and going out alternately every
six hours to which these ancient
explorers offer a possible explanation
and this also curiously could be why the
flight and sailing restrictions at the
North Pole
why people like Rodney clef were turned
away when their vessel tried to explore
the North Pole Russian military vessels
and other ships explored the area making
sure that we don't take our own
independent explorations to the north
polar region so what are they hiding
there does this magnetic mount meru acts
they exist is there actually a whirlpool
spinning around it with four directional
rivers constantly sucking in and pushing
out the waters of the earth in six hour
intervals it sure would be nice if the
UN and world governments would allow us
to independently explore the Arctic and
Antarctic so we could find answers to
questions like these when light of any
kind shines through a dense medium it
appears larger or rather gives a greater
glare at a given distance than when it
is seen through a lighter medium this is
more remarkable when the medium holds
aqueous particles or vapor in solution
as in a damp or foggy atmosphere you can
see this by standing within a few yards
of a street lamp and noticing the size
of the light on going away too many
times the distance the light upon the
atmosphere will appear considerably
larger this phenomenon may be noticed to
a greater or lesser degree at all times
but when the air is moist and vapoury it
is more intense it is evident that at
sunrise and at sunset the sun's light
must shine through a greater length of
atmospheric air than at midday besides
which the air near the earth is both
more dense and holds more watery
particles and solution than the higher
strata through which the Sun shines at
noonday and hence the light must be
dilated or magnified as well as modified
in colors so the Sun as it sets towards
the horizon from a viewers perspective
on earth simultaneously gets bigger due
to the reason given above and smaller
due to the law of perspective the net
result is what you see notice how the
distant lights have a brighter and
bigger glare even though they're further
away many contributing factors including
wavelength diffraction air pressure air
temperature width of aperture altitude
humidity and clarity all contribute to
the net result the amount to which the
Sun and Moon will be magnified due to
the above reasons
and shrink due to the law perspective
will depend on all of the above he
nature.com writes the moon's warm color
when seen at lower angles is caused by
the relatively larger amount of
atmosphere through which one is
observing it as compared to when the
moon is right overhead this additional
atmosphere scatters the bluish component
of the light of the moon
making the low-lying moon appear redder
to the observers eyes if you look later
when the moon is higher above the
horizon you'll see it appears much
whiter than earlier in the evening it
does change and the changes are mostly
due to the atmosphere so I can show you
a picture of the Sun setting in the
desert where it's very dry and you'll
see the Sun shrink and shrink into a
tiny tiny pinprick before it disappears
into the horizon and then I can show you
another video of on a more over the
ocean say I'm the more humid day the Sun
is going to actually expand a little bit
due to the atmosphere and then disappear
into the horizon like a big ball as you
people have seen it but either way that
it disappears whether it disappears into
a pinprick before leaving the horizon or
it expands and then goes down the
horizon it's simply moving away from
your perspective as we talked about it's
not actually going down just like a row
of street lamps aren't getting shorter
and shorter as they get farther and
farther away from you it's just an
element of perspective
beer is it really just a big ball
floating in space spinning on its axis
at a thousand miles per hour curling
around the Sun at 67,000 miles burn
whizzing through the Milky Way at a milk
curdling speed of over half a million
miles per hour and walk driving through
the heaven at over half billion miles
per hour and read about the Sun is it
really 93 million miles away and close
to a billion miles in diameter with a
circumference of nearly three million
miles and it's constantly illuminating
half of our entire Earth's surface with
the rotation of the earth creating our
24-hour days our night days or Shh
and maybe it's completely still just
like we experienced and maybe the Sun
isn't big but is very small and very
close and not illuminating the earth
from 93 million miles but is
illuminating locally and maybe
everything the Sun Moon and stars are
not far away but our circling overhead
relatively close in this video we're
going to explore the latter option and
at the end we're going to reveal
startling evidence through the use of
time-lapse photography that the Sun
cannot possibly be 93 million miles away
but is in fact very close and is
illuminating locally as it traverses our
Flat Earth oh man and watch how this Sun
comes at you boom
I mean come on and that's all
perspective if you look at jet trails
Google Images you'll see them they start
out low with the pryzen they come up
overhead look at that thing they come up
overhead and they go down to the horizon
perfectly explains what the Sun would do
here it is going overhead
I love time-lapse and look at this you
can't go out and look at the Sun you
can't see this stuff except that it's on
you know time-lapse like this it's
incredible and watch this thing it's
sweeping you know the Sun over flat
earth is doing a big circle right
look at this thing it's sweep into the
rice like a lefty bowler just toss that
down the alley and there it goes
hooking into the pocket
you can see how the clouds ain't down to
the horizon shot there that's exactly
how the Sun would do
uncluttered okay back to the Copernican
principle and this is what they tell us
the Sun is 93 million miles away now I'm
gonna show you evidence through sunsets
that shows the Sun light following the
Sun over the horizon and it shrinks as
it goes over now there's no way it would
do that if the Sun is 93 million miles
away okay personally show you some
footage from the ISS
okay now watch this animation watch this
sunset now this is exactly if they came
to me and said do an animation this is
how I would do it if the Sun were 93
million miles away just like that have
the whole horizon fade evenly but that's
not what we see
okay Wow look at that look how the light
who lifts off the ground like a big
wedge or like lifting up a sheet of
paper that's incredible footage
definitely the lights following the Sun
right okay next I'm going to show you
how a son that is circling over the
earth that creates the horizontal aspect
of the Sun if you combine that with
perspective which creates the up and
down of the Sun the rising in the
setting you get the twenty-three point
five degrees tilt that they talk about
it's nothing but perspective and a
circle inside
here's another son sweeping out a big
circle
okay here's a phenomenon that you might
be wondering how in the heck do you
explain this on a flat earth
well this footage is taken from Alaska
during the summer and the Sun does look
like it's going up and down the reason
it's doing that is that this town in
Alaska is not in the center of the sun's
circular circuit in other words the Sun
is making a big circle and the town is
not in the center of that circle so the
Sun will be closer and further from the
viewer with the camera that will cause
it to go higher and lower and also maybe
even bigger and smaller
look at the high altitude airplane
remember this is from a high altitude
balloon so that airplane is probably at
cruising altitude notice how it looks
like it's going up from the horizon
that's exactly how the Sun will rise
because that plane is staying parallel
to the ground and now ratchet will go
down to the other horizon all right
again perspective that's how the Sun
will set and forget the big ball
that's just due to a GoPro camera but
see how the Sun that's the point of this
and then also look at the size of the
Sun man look at that thing I mean there
is something to it to say that we're the
higher were higher up our view and the
Sun looks bigger and it looks like it's
not as high in the sky as it does when
we're on the ground something today
let's explore this notion a bit further
that the Sun looks bigger when filmed
from higher up
the next three slides I'm going to do a
comparison a side-by-side the one on the
left the cameras above the clouds the
camera on the right is ground level
and the point for the side-by-side
comparison from the ground level and the
level above the clouds is that above the
clouds we're only maybe a mile or so up
and if the Sun appears to be closer to
the camera well that means it's probably
much closer because if the Sun were 93
million miles away a mile closer
wouldn't make any difference at all to
its visual appearance
okay here's a little illustrator or a
little cartoon from a website called
time and date comm it's really funny
that they would have a perfect
illustration of a Sun rising and setting
on a flat earth due to perspective
you'll notice that it rises from below
the horizon and sets below the horizon
now you might be saying well how is that
possible I can see now you're saying
that it rises and lowers due to
perspective but how does it disappear
below the horizon well I got a theory
about that because of the fact that all
parallel lines and planes converge at
your eye level horizon this is according
to the perspective I'm not making this
up
if in fact and they do they converge at
your eye level horizon visually then it
makes sense that after that point they
diverge meaning they then separate so
the Sun would continue on a downward
track as you can see from my
illustration here the lines would go to
your horizon and then afterwards they
would spread out and separate kind of
like a starburst and the starburst being
at your horizon
at your focal point
anyway without further ado we're gonna
start talking about and I'm gonna start
showing you the time-lapse of the
sunsets that I'm talking about that
clearly show the Sun is close and
illuminating locally here we go alright
and here are a couple of time-lapse
sunsets and just like the Sun rises at
the beginning of this video where you
could see the Sun coming at you not
maintaining any 93 million mile distance
here you can also see the Sun moving
away and it's clearly not due to the
rotation of the earth and a son that's
maintaining 93 million miles away but
the Sun is moving over the earth and
moving away from him
okay these next three slides the Sun is
almost set already behind the horizon
but watches the sunlight shrinks and
follows the Sun it's definitely a
locally illuminating Sun not far away
not very big and definitely not 93
million miles away
okay remember this video from the
beginning at the video I showed you this
one and how it's circling over the earth
and watch it sweep to the right like a
bowler bowling it in there for a strike
okay now I want you to pay attention to
the way the light follows the Sun the
Sun light is going to shrink right as it
follows the locally illuminating Sun
functions
see a drinking problem is on you do not
get that if the Sun is 93 million miles
away the entire horizon should fade
evenly just like this supposed shot
taken from space of the earth you can
clearly see the way they depicted they
depict the demarcation between day and
night or light and dark as a long
straight line and you can see the long
straight line moving is one solid piece
that means that the sunset should all
fade the entire horizon should fade
evenly but that's not what we observe as
we will see and as we've seen in the
footage so far the sunlight shrinks and
follows the Sun over the horizon so
these time-lapse sunsets are definitely
the nail in the coffin for heliocentrism
but this particular one here shot from
above the clouds from this Observatory
is the final nail in the coffin look at
how the Sun just shrinks and the light
shrinks to nothing that cannot happen as
I showed you in the when the Sun
illuminates the entire earth which it
does from 93 million miles away it has
to you don't get this isolated look at
the sunlight trailing the Sun that's
only possible with a small Sun close not
very high illuminating locally I mean if
this isn't proof to you then you gotta
take the blinders off
okay and finally I want to show you some
examples of global illumination or a
city in the background this is from
Grand Canyon National Park you can see
Las Vegas is one of them see the stars
going down so you know that's not the
Sun that's the glow of Las Vegas it says
you can see that's local illumination
I'm just making an example showing you
that there's Tuba City and a little bit
of Flagstaff now and this one here you
see two lights obviously we don't have
two sons but these are two cities lit up
and it's just to show it looks just like
the Sun going over the horizon that's
the point but be showing that that's
local illumination at work the Sun is
not 93 million miles away because if it
was the entire horizon would fade evenly
and the entire horizon would fade at the
same time not oficina
which is the small Sun cruising over the
earth and the light is following case
closed
hey everybody this is a video about the
sunbeams or the sun rays that come
through the clouds called crepuscular
rays and what i'm gonna do here is prove
in this video with a series of proves
beyond a shadow of a doubt that the sun
is close and the Sun is small first I'm
gonna show you an experiment I did with
the sunrays that's very solid proof that
the Sun is in fact close and not very
big and then I'm gonna refute
Wikipedia's account of these crepuscular
rays they say that these rays are due to
perspective and that in fact they are
for all intents and purposes parallel
lines from a Sun that's almost a million
miles in diameter but the fact that we
see them splaying out they say that
that's due to perspective I'm going to
show that that's impossible and then
number three I'm going to show that it's
actually when you take a look at this
picture of the corpuscular rays that
actually perspective is missing from
this photo if in fact the Sun were a
million miles in diameter and 93 million
miles away heliocentric models in
trouble so let's get to my experiment I
watched a video from my perspective this
video is called Flat Earth Sun beams
part one I was outside I go man let me
try that and I just kind of ran in I
grabbed some cardboard I cut some holes
in it and I wanted to see how the Sun
reacts coming through so here I am
raising it high over my head so I'm
about eight feet away from this and the
light doesn't diverge or spread out I
know it doesn't splay out like we see
the crepuscular rays and this Suns far
away just like in the heliocentric model
the Sun is far away right 93 million
miles away from our clouds but we see
the sunrays splaying out from the clouds
as though it were a closed Sun and not a
faraway Sun well you can see when it is
far away the light beams are parallel
and they don't splay out or diverge from
the clouds so then I got a little bit
more sophisticated I went inside and I
cut some nicer holes in another
cardboard you know my budget went up and
here they are and I put some CGI here I
put some
beam's in there you can see they are
dead straight no splaying out and then
you can also there's a part here where I
have it up overhead and I had the same
results no splaying out so this is the
example of the Far Away Sun that the
Rays this is what we should experience
coming through the clouds but the rays
from a Sun that's almost a million miles
in diameter and 93 million miles away
when those rays get here they should be
parallel and dead stream but we don't
see them as dead straight we see them
splaying out or diverging from the clubs
something's not right here
okay Here I am inside notice I got my
light close look at already you can see
the lights playing out you see that it's
a guy drew the you can see the circles
on the floor and on my piece of
cardboard actually those in the original
size of the holes that when I was
outside they lined up perfectly here you
can see them completely splaying out and
if I put the Rays on it like this on the
sun rays and that's not even it's played
out as they got it's just that the cloud
is in view and I want you to be able to
see the cloud which is my cardboard with
the holes cut out of it that way I could
line up the Rays but as you can see when
I moved up a little bit off the floor
and put the light even closer the Rays
really splayed out so I just wanted you
to see that
okay so there you go there's hard
evidence that when the light source is
close to the clouds the light will
diverge the dispersion pattern of you
can see when I was outside the
dispersion pattern remained the same
meaning the five holes that I had lit
like that stayed exactly the same and
that's a faraway light source but when
the light source was closed they splay
out that definitely supports the Flat
Earth model of a small close Sun
okay let's analyze this claim that
science makes ER and Wikipedia banks
that the crepuscular rays are due to
perspective that there are actually very
close to parallel lines for all intents
and purposes they are parallel coming
from a Sun that's almost a million miles
in diameter but we don't see them
parallel coming through the clouds those
crepuscular rays are angled outward they
splay out they're diverging from the
clouds and Wikipedia is saying that
that's due to perspective okay and
Wikipedia also uses railroad tracks like
these and they say see how these
converge at your horizon or they diverge
from the perspective of the Sun outward
and they're saying that that's what's
going on here okay so we need a quick
little review of perspective notice in
this long hallway all parallel lines and
planes angle to the eye level or the eye
position of the observer notice that the
side walls angle in those are parallel
lines to one another and the ceiling in
the floor are also parallel but notice
how they anger toward each other and
they come to your eye level
all right you have an x y&z axis so the
railroad tracks would fit your z axis
that's going away from you and those
lines yes they converge but the Sun and
especially when the sun's overhead would
be bombarding us with huge vertical
parallel lines or rays parallel rays yet
we don't see any of that ever so what
I'm going to show you here is that this
claim that these crepuscular rays is due
to perspective is not true it's
impossible because perspective will not
converge or diverge or splay out lines
or planes that are parallel to one
another that are perpendicular to the
viewer or his z axis
okay so like in this picture of the
railroad tracks here the lines going
away from you let's I did with the Green
Line that's the railroad track that's
obvious and right from the get-go they
start to converge now those are parallel
lines but yet we never see them as
parallel they're always converging as
they go away from you now the black
poles that I have going down the side of
the railroad tracks are also parallel
lines to one another but notice that
they stay parallel they don't lose their
parallel orientation they may get
shorter and they get smaller that's true
they do have a sort of a convergence but
they don't change their parallel
orientation these vertical lines because
they're perpendicular to now this is why
invoking perspective to explain the
crepuscular rays doesn't work because
perspective does not splay out these
vertical lines yet whenever the Sun is
overhead we should see vertical parallel
rays everywhere and yet we don't see
them so perspective as an explanation
for this is invalid you know what we see
is the rays emanating from this
omnidirectional Sun the Rays fit the
size of the Sun and the angles of the
Rays off the Sun also fit the size of
the Sun and the shape of the Sun but but
they shouldn't fit the size of the Sun
if the Sun is in fact almost a million
miles in diameter in 93 million miles
away the Rays should be huge in the Sun
small so that's telling us that the Sun
is in fact close okay and let's go back
to what Wikipedia said wikipedia says
that the rays from the Sun are in fact
parallel lines but we don't see them
that way because of perspective
perspective displays them out okay look
at this picture I put these rays in okay
so this is what's really going on
wikipedia says they say that rays are
really parallel and they would be from a
million mile diameter Sun but this is
what our eyes do through perspective its
plays it out okay here's another one
they say this is how they really are
they're vertical and they're parallel
but our eyes splay them out like this
okay so then why doesn't perspective
take these telephone poles and splay
them out like this mm-hmm we don't see
that do we why doesn't it take these
buildings and splay them out like this
they're vertical and they're parallel
well because what we see the crepuscular
rays is not due to perspective it's just
due to the nature of an omnidirectional
light source with the light coming out
in all directions and it's coming from a
small Sun it's impossible that this Sun
is a million miles in diameter as I've
already showed you so then if it's not
perspective these crepuscular rays are
not due to perspective as Wikipedia and
science in general claims they are then
what are they well it's very simple all
they are is radially propagated light or
another way of saying it light rays
emanating out from a common center like
the Sun or any light and I understand
that the light rays coming off the Sun
looks like perspective it shares the
common trait where with perspective all
the lines and planes converge at a point
in the distance called your vanishing
point the Sun also has that look where
the looks like the rays all converge at
a point in the center of the light
actually the light rays are emanating
out from a common center but I can
understand how they look like but
they're not the same okay
that's all it is and so as we've already
proved that perspective can't explain
the corpuscular rates because where are
all the vertical parallel sun rays then
they don't exist okay so next I'm going
to show you with streetlights and
sunlight and how they look exactly alike
okay let's take a look at some light
rays let's look at how the Sun and a
streetlamp look the same
the one on the left is a streetlight and
the one on the right is the Sun
okay notice that the light source and
the Rays match one another and with the
street light that light is here on earth
right it's right there on your street
and those rays look in proportion to
that light they're also here right on
your street or wherever you see that
light the Sun they're telling us is
actually far away but the light rays are
close like when we see these crepuscular
rays coming through the clouds and did
you know that street lights also have
crepuscular rays just like the Sun does
and you know what they look identical
let's have a look here on the left
that's a street light and those are
crepuscular rays coming off of that
street light and they look identical
they are in the same proportion as our
Sun and it's rays and you can't say that
that's perspective because they're right
there and as we've seen perspective
can't explain those rays anyway so those
rays are nothing more than radially
propagated light in other words it's
light coming from a common Center that's
all and look at this one the left one is
a street light the one on the right or
sun rays
they are both in proportion to one
another the light source matches its
rays which indicates that they're both
local okay and this street light is here
we know it's here and we know those
crepuscular rays are here there's no
fooling us and telling us this 93
million miles away or a million miles in
diameter and it looks just like the Sun
that they're telling us is far away and
huge and whose light rays are here
though on the earth same here same as
what we see in the sky the Sun matches
the sun rays
but in the heliocentric model with the
Sun that's 93 million miles away and
almost a million miles in diameter the
race should be completely out of
proportion like this you know we
shouldn't even maybe even see the Sun
maybe the Sun should just be a blob of
light on the other side of our lit up
atmosphere from these huge rains I mean
we see the Sun like it's in our
atmosphere like it's close but it can't
be according to the heliocentric model
and next I want to show you how in this
photo perspective is actually missing
and what's ironic is the very linear
perspective that they tried to invoke to
explain this photo is actually missing
from this photo for the heliocentric
model to be true okay
so what do I mean by that well I mean
they invoked perspective to describe or
explain these crepuscular rays but the
fact that they're splaying out from the
clouds because they had to invoke
perspective or something because this
picture doesn't work for the
heliocentric model this picture of these
crepuscular rays is a problem for their
model because the Sun is supposed to be
a million miles in diameter but the
problem is they've invoked perspective
but perspective doesn't work because as
I've already showed you it doesn't
explain the parallel vertical lines that
we should see all over the place
perspective will not display those out
right so these vertical rays should be
everywhere the parallel vertical rays
but we don't see them
the perspective that's missing is like
the Sun is out there and it's almost a
million miles in diameter right so it's
Sun beam that shoots out a Sun beam and
that Sun beam is a hundred thousand
miles wide let's say but what we see
from here looks very small right but not
when it gets here when it gets here it's
going to be massive okay but yet look at
the sun rays coming through the clouds
they're small they're skinny they're
tiny they match the local Sun that we
see in the sky here so that's what I
mean by perspectives missing and let me
give you
a couple of real-world examples that
help you figure this out okay now
imagine you're in a football game an
American football game and you can see
the player the quarterback down in the
field and he's as big as a peanut okay
on the field even smaller okay and the
football is the size of a short grain of
rice and he's got this great arm and he
turns around and he throws that ball up
to you in the stands and he can throw it
all the way to you now I got a question
for you when the ball gets to you is it
going to be the size of a grain of rice
or is it going to be the size of a
regulation football well it's going to
be the size of a regulation football
right but that's not what we see in this
picture with the sun rays those sun rays
fit the size of the Sun and now let's
take a look at this soccer player all
right for those of you don't know
American football there he kicks it he's
far away and when ball gets to you it's
gonna be the size of a soccer ball all
right this is proper perspective this is
the perspective we're not seeing when we
look at the Sun the Sun that we see in
the sky is close okay here's a train
leaving a station far away down the
tracks also analogous to the Rays
leaving the million mile diameter Sun
okay the Rays would be massive just like
the Train is massive compared to that
little train station right that's proper
perspective now look at these shafts of
light coming from the Sun the Rays the
Sun on the right here each of its rays
that you see coming off to something
would be about a hundred thousand miles
wide just like this you could fit ten
Earth's side by side in that ray okay so
when we look at these rays they're not a
hundred thousand miles wide and they're
diverging out from a small Sun that we
see in the sky I mean that proves right
there the Sun is close and small now I
know somebody's gonna seize upon this
and say hey wait a minute
but we don't see perspective with the
Sun traveling over the Flat Earth we
should see it shrink to a dot and
disappear we don't see that well I was
gonna save this for another video and I
may be still will but let me introduce
you celestial perspective it's different
than regular perspective that we're used
to everyday regular perspective we see a
train on the tracks and as it goes away
from you gets smaller and smaller and
smaller until it disappears but the Sun
on the other hand
different because the Sun when it's
quote-unquote next to you is high
overhead and has already experienced a
reduction in size now as it goes away
from you it follows the convergence
lines down to your horizon essentially
keeping it same distance from you so the
two movements offset each other with the
one the Sun moving away from you and
then the visually lowering as it follows
the convergence lines down to your eye
level horizon also Sun is too big to
shrink to a dot anyway right it's going
to go below the observers horizon before
that happens
now note this about the convergence
lines notice that on this wall of lines
the higher up they get the more steep
they get they orient themselves away
from the horizontal and more to the
vertical so the train on the tracks is
that goes away from you it's right on
your eye level it's actually on your z
axis here's a picture of the z axis x
axis and y axis it's on your z axis so
all you can see is the train get smaller
and smaller and smaller you you can't
see any movement laterally or vertically
out of that plane but the Sun is
different because the Sun even though
it's cruising over the earth parallel to
the ground it's on a much higher plane
so when it's overhead it's already had a
visual reduction in size so now when it
goes away from you and it follows those
convergence lines down it'll appear this
to be the same size because the going
away and the lowering kind of offset
each other and same as this train if you
put this train high up overhead that
will cause it to already have a visual
reduction in size also so now when it
goes away from you it too will maintain
its size kind of like if you're flying a
kite right and you have the kite and
it's a mile overhead well it'll appear
certain signs right but let's say it
takes a nosedive but the string stays
taut so it goes all the way to the
ground now it's a mile further down the
road from you but it's still the same
size visually right so that's kind of
how this works too
so let's recap in my experiment I showed
that when the Sun is close to race play
out but when the Sun is far the Rays are
straight parallel beams yet this is what
they show us this picture of crepuscular
rays and sake but that's a faraway Sun
then I showed you how respective can't
explain what we see because it doesn't
splay out things like these poles or
these buildings and then I showed how
the Sun mimicks perspective it has the
same look the light rays radially
propagate outward or they radiate out
from a common Center and that's what
we're seeing with the Sun it's not
perspective and then I showed how the
streetlights the crepuscular
streetlights match the Sun the same
crepuscular rays from the Sun and from
the streetlights and they look identical
both local light sources and local rays
then I showed you celestial perspective
and that's different from regular
perspective like the train going down
the tracks that's on your same plane as
your eyes and as that goes away it can
only shrink and get smaller and smaller
but the Sun is high up overhead so it's
vertically already had a visual
reduction in size so as it goes down to
your eye level horizon it'll maintain
its same size okay and that wraps up
celestial perspective and that wraps up
this presentation I believe we've made a
strong case a lot of evidence here if
not complete proof and thank you so much
for watching there's only one thing left
to do let's kick the ball out of here
