As some of you may know, a couple of years ago, I ended up in New York City. Even though
I've been to the Big Apple before I'm always flabbergasted by the buildings in the general hustle-bustle of the big city.
I happened to be there on September 11th and a friend of mine Tom said I should take this opportunity to walk down to Ground Zero
And ask some 911 truthers about the tragic events of 2001. So, truthers, why are you here?
WOMAN: I'm here today because there are questions that  remain unanswered.
MAN: I'm here for, um...
I'm here to spread the truth about 9/11 and
ask people to ask questions about what really happened.
MAN 2: Well as I do every year, come down here and just try to inform people of
the events of 9/11, how they don't add up to the official story that they
put out, uh, proliferated to the public .
MILES: So let's debunk some of their claims.
WOMAN: Why are they still allowing steel buildings to be built if that's an inherent
problem? That if the right conditions come along the building disintegrates-
MILES: I'd say the right conditions are fairly extraordinary like a plane going
WOMAN: That building was made for jets to hit it!
MILES: No, it was made for a slow moving, smaller plane with hardly any fuel.
WOMAN: That's not true. That's not true.
MILES: Mmm, yes it is.
The chief engineer of the two towers, Leslie Robinson, calculated
how well the towers would handle an impact from the largest jet line in service at the time, the Boeing 707.
Not the Boeing 767 the mega plane that crashed into the Twin Towers
and that was not introduced until 1982, nine years after the opening of the World Trade Centre, in 1973.
Both roughly were about the same,
but the 767s have a 7.9 meter longer wingspan, allowing them to be more destructive than the 707,
as they were able to take out more of the building's core columns when it crashed into it.
Leslie's calculations also assumed that the plane was low on fuel and lost in the fog while searching for an airport and
relatively low speed, like the b-25 bomber that hit the Empire State Building in 1945.
It created a 5.5 meter gash even though its wingspan was 20.6 meters across.
Hey, I guess flight 77 wasn't the first time a plane left a gash less than the length of its wingspan.
Just saying. The impact speed predicted for the 707 was estimated to be approximately
180 miles an hour - that's 80 meters per second. However American Airlines flight 11 was traveling at 470 miles per hour. That's approximately
210 meters per second when it hit the North Tower, and United Airlines flight 175 was traveling at
590 miles per hour that's roughly about
264 meters per second
The energy contained in an airplane or other moving object is proportional to the velocity. [Correction: velocity squared]
If you double the velocity you get 4 times the energy. Triple the velocity, you get eight times the energy, and so on and so forth.
And you can work this out from the equation "kinetic energy equals 1/2 m v squared"
Where m is the mass of an object in kilograms and V is the object speed in meters per second. This means that the Boeing 767
hit the North Tower with eleven point seven times more energy than predicted by Leslie's
707 model. But I think we're all forgetting something here,
which is that the twin towers did survive the impacts. They were able to cope with larger planes flying at a much higher speed
smacking into the side of them.
And they withstood, they stood for a long time, allowing thousands of people to escape.
The reason the towers collapsed was a mixture of damage from the impacts and the resulting fires,
which weakened the steel. So how does she respond?
MILES: The buildings did survive the initial
plane going in it. I mean they were there for-
WOMAN: For an hour and a half before they collapsed, so explain that.
MILES: But I would say that afterwards it was the fire then, that then softened the-
WOMAN: Look at the pictures and you will see that the fires are dark grey smoke after the initial explosion.
So an hour and a half after the fires had cooled, the buildings collapsed because of the fires?
MILES: Dark grey smoke does not indicate that the fires were cool. In fact
It's very difficult to tell anything from the colour of the smoke.
There's no rule that states that dark grey smoke means lack of oxygen or fuel.
I mean, look at this car on fire. Do you think it doesn't have enough oxygen? Yeah, it produces thick grey smoke.
What about this Boeing 707 military tank plane that crashed during takeoff?
Do you think the fire had enough fuel?Because it also produced thick smoke.
MILES: Fires they even if they're not burning as high as they could be
they still are pretty hot and enough to actually structurally-
WOMAN: Yes but steel doesn't even melt until 700-800 degrees-
MILES: I know, but it loses quite a lot of its strength.
WOMAN: Yes, so again, I would expect it to bend, I would expect it to be twisted-
MILES: But it kind of does. Like, if you look on the video, before it collapsed, it kind of bows inwards, where-
WOMAN: Because if you do research on controlled demolition that's exactly what they do. she's not the only one who thinks this when it goes in
MILES:  She's not the only one who thinks this.
MAN 1: When it bows in, it's not gonna explode out. Like I have a slow-motion video of that, of that exactly-
MILES: Yeah it kind of flicked out didn't it when it went-
MAN 2: The bowing in is actually indicative of an implosion- of them taking the building down.
MILES: To understand why the bowing of the outer columns of the twin tower is
important, you need to understand the structure of the building.
traditionally skyscrapers use
Evenly spaced core columns in the twin towers the columns of the building normally found evenly spaced out were moved out to become the outer
wall of the building this left large open spaces for officers the at war was then connected to the inner core by a series of
Fortresses which were then covered in ten centimeters of concrete the columns in the core were not in case with concrete
Normal fireproof instead like the outer columns and the trusses
They were sprayed with fireproof phone
However when the plane crashed into the building Moses fireproofing was blown away and no one ever said that steel melted in the building's
Steel depending on the alloy melts at around
1500 degrees Celsius
But loses 50% of its strength at around five hundred and ninety degrees Celsius the fires in the Twin Towers are predicted to be around
982 degrees Celsius as a result the trusses heated up and lost their strength and began to expand and
Decide some would have even collapse putting more weight on the floors below as they sank they pulled the outer wall in
this is where you can see this bowing from as much as
125 centimeters in places the bowing continued until the outer wall columns finally reached their breaking point and snapped and then the building collapsed
Despite my hardest effort. I was unable to find any controlled demolitions that pulled in part the building slowly before it collapsed
There's also no way of cutting any of the columns that would have created the same effect through the scene in
thousands of videos and thousands of pictures, but what the truth is say when confronted with this evidence for fire damage
You can actually see just before it collapses. They actually boughs inwards on
The video yeah on the video that was the pile is awesome. That's uh
Well rather than me explain. Why that?
To be fair that this crime is a good sport, I've just been given ten questions to why you should question
911 okay absolutely quickly, I think is a bit cheeky because there's only knowing like the tenth one is a
Bit cheeky
So what evidence the truth is have that these buildings came down by controlled demolition now?
I have just under three hours of footage here, so I'm only going to talk about a few things because I'm only one guy
like 2000 architects and engineers that
they all banded together and they put this this website and organization together, and they explained that how it's
Impossible for the buildings to have fallen DiPaola a freefall speed that the building fell at freefall speed
Truthly say then object of freefall will take around 10 seconds to fall from the height of the Twin Towers
And the fact that they fell in 10 seconds proved that demolition charges of blown floors out beneath the point of collapse
Allowing the building to fall at freefall
This is already really easy to disprove just look at the footage for yourself and time it
It's well above 10 seconds in fact most of the footage even shows part of the low portions of both towers
around 60 stories of World Trade Center 1 and 40 stories of World Trade Center to remain standing for up to 25 seconds after the
initial collapse
And then they fell down themselves some truth others
Don't seem to see this even though it's on the DVD loose change. You have to read collapse. There's still pictures and stuff
It's two columns the inner core
Still being around so if if you're saying that it did you do oh
There's loads of videos of it even on the I got a DVD for loose change actually it's even on that you can see it
Sorry it's still upright the the hole in a thing from a good
No, it's quite high. I don't really know, but it's a good 10 20 30 stories. I
Don't know sue see if if he I'm not making this up if you even on the loose change
You can even get a DVD from a nice guy over there. Who's handing them out and on that loose change
Also for some reasons truth is put in the whole height of the twin towers when they
Do their equations to work out that it's going to take 10 seconds to fall a free fall
Why don't they take it from where the point of collapse is I've never really understood that but looking past all of this
There's even an easier way to disprove
This watch as I try to explain it to this guy first of all a lot of people say that well
I've watched videos wrong and I don't think they really fall at free pool
No, I I've seen actually loose change number two like the other day, and he only counts like the debris
That's actually coming off and then when that hits the floor. He's like
Oh, that's got it fruitful, but then you've got to think well it is good
it's not attached or anything and
A one way of just looking at it was still there would be some kind of resistance
It still falls fast regardless. Oh, no yeah, it's so reforms. I think one of them was in about 16 seconds
I'm sorry, and the other won't give me when it gets to like the bottom. Yeah
You know there is a lot of debris in everything but
Everything else don't have structure itself, but even like an easy way to show that it's not falling through for this
There's actually a picture of it falling and you can see there's actually debris below
The point where it's actually coming down so for it to do that it must mean that it's not falling it freefall
It's falling consider is low if it's a good 20 30 floors above err
You brief and low it
Say, yes, there's definitely
there's a picture of like I
one of the
steel beams was quite few them actually and they're falling they've came off the top of the building and they're like free falling because they're
Not attached or anymore and you can see them a good twenty thirty flurries, but no hello
Sorry
Not but no below the actual point where it's actually collapsing down so it can't be going a free fall if it's so much
It falls faster than the rest of the buildings. Well. It's it
No
It's falling it freefall and the building isn't it's way above so I'd say just about looking the pictures that you could see that
It's not really doing that. I haven't seen those pictures
No, I haven't seen those pictures
you
Are a ground zero
Telling me that the twin towers came down because of controlled demolition and you've not seen any of the pictures of it collapsing
Really because they all show this all the pictures all the videos, but I shouldn't be mean to this guy
He was actually really nice and gave me a DVD that it burns at home
Don't wanna see that you're giving out DVDs
Change Oh, which one I know those three the final
the final cut and there's this guy where
Yeah
What?
What's that like yeah, he prepped me for the 11 colonized
Sorry my my American history is very bad
Hit first by flight living the Pentagon 77 feet tall hit by play 77
All these like weird coincidences that it's bigger than somebody just plotting it, but you'd say that was a coincidence
I you wouldn't say it's some kind of evil Bond villain who's trying to give like little hints out there to be I
Don't know I'd say no offense to your government, but they can hide a
Semen stain on a dress and they know fact, that's very crude of me
they couldn't hide that and I I and I think it was a bit of a
Bit unfortunate and important onward that Bush when he was told he just sat there leading to my pet goat. I think that shows
That maybe they weren't the brightest sparks
Really controlling, but I don't know in a classroom stain plane hit stealing gold or something like that
Sorry, who's in that classroom in part and the kids were reading out loud. Yeah, saying like Queen in steel. They're saying
I'm not sure about that hmm. Yeah, that's that's a little too crazy for me
Including the fire we entered that lobby there were explosions from that basement
Before the flames here, nope no one said this and when you think about it
Okay, maybe there would have been a policeman at the Twin Towers before the planes here, but a fireman are
there firemen stationed at all skyscrapers
I think she's making it up as she goes along oh and also remember explosion doesn't equal explosive what?
Not certainly a conspiracy theorist he says those generators and in the basement of the
Lobby below now
But but then it exploited kind of came down from the top though not the bottom
and I think I know the guy you're talking about he I think he's got a book called last man out and yeah and
He did say that he heard these explosions
But he wasn't aware that a plane hit it and what people think it
Is is the unfortunately was the the elevator or so you guys say them, but?
What I was talking about before I was interrupted was when the plane crashed it severed the lift cables alone lifts to freefall and hit
the bottom of the shafts jet fuel from the plane also entered the lift shafts and traveled up and down them and
exploded under parts of least resistance and when she says
Daylight, I wonder who she's referring to is she referring to brian reeves a 34 year old secludes
Can't work in the lobby World Trade Center one
He started to run after hear an explosion that he thought sounded like a missile
But he didn't make it very far when he was knocked down by a fireball that rolled down the elevator shaft
He suffered third-degree burns to 40% of his body. What about David curette?
He said I saw a couple of elevators in freefall you could hear them whizzing down as they crashed there was a huge explosion
Like a fireball exploding out of a bank of elevators
He also said that he saw people who were engulfed in flames the elevators and UPS buildings are not one shaft
Is an elevator you have to get on get on to another Bank and get on to another Bank. There are no shaft from the
Down to the one will this express that goes, but that wasn't the one that would have taken
No, I'm talking about the explosions that he makes
I
Really don't have any clue what she's talking about here, but let's go back. Let's talk about this last man
I've got his name is William Rodriguez
He was a janitor in the North Tower
But is now making a living out of his DVD cells at the morning of September 11th
He was in an office on the warm, which is one of the basements
He heard a massive explosion beneath him he ran out to discover the two people who've been helped out of a lift
Which had fallen that free fall this lift was 50a
he believes that the damage and lobby could not have been caused by through fallen lifts and Jeff vehicle traveling down the shaft because
50a was the only lift to have serviced every single floor and the passengers survived it however the blueprints show that although most lifts did
Only serve a part of the building the shafts himself ran the entire length of the building allowing jet fuel to actually go down them
And take a step backwards a second
What would be the point of actually putting explosives at the base of the building?
I mean let's not forget the same clients from the top. I mean that's the point
What about the injuries of the people in the lobby itself or the lobby itself?
They're entirely consistent with jet fuel and not
explosives so truth is you don't think the towers were brought down by planes getting massive holes into the side of them and
The fire is causing the steel to weakened so what do you think actually brought them down?
I think it was brought down with explosive charges in nano
It doesn't senior, it's a nano-thermite that was found in the dust
Yes thermite, but what is fir -
Rosie who don't know thermite is a mixture of a metal powder the metal oxide that can undergo an exothermic oxidation reduction
reaction I made thermite the - torn mixture of iron oxide an aluminium to destroy my Xboxes dead tooth reread bring me and
Unfortunately, I bought a dodgy blowtorch to light the magnesium fuse and well
Yeah
Now this reaction is extremely dangerous, and it's really hard to control because it has its own oxygen source
So please do not try to recreate this at home and in case you're interested
I used 1.5 kilograms of the thermite - trying to destroy this 4 kilogram Xbox
They didn't do a very good job in fact. It was pretty much in one piece at the end
It's kind of very it's not very explosive it can burn through steel
But you need a hell of a lot of it to actually do it so
the only the way you look like you do in fact you if
The least level of termite what you got notice how you started to change the conversation?
I found that day that all truth is do this and that's why I'm having to make such harsh cuts in these videos
Ok I'm going off in a bit of a tangent cut sparklers are awesome, and he's right
They are made for among other things a metal oxide and a metal powder as fuel now remember
How I said the thermite reaction has its own oxygen source
Yep fire underwater
awesome
Try some, but where did truthless get the idea that thermite brought down these buildings
There is a there is a published peer-reviewed paper by dr.
Stephen jones and niels harrit what they did was they took 5 samples of the dust?
And they studied it under microscope launched a lot of technical stuff, but they found unexploded
Nano-thermite materials, and the dust they reported on this it's been
Ok so that's a look at this peer-reviewed paper by dr. Steven Jones
It was named activated thematic material discovered in the dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center catastrophe
So let's start the beginning. Where did Steve get these two samples from sample one was the earliest collected sample and came from mr.
Frank
last
Whatever who was on the Manhattan side of the Brooklyn Bridge about the time the second tower the North Tower fell to the ground he
Saw is how fallen was involved by the resulting thick dust which sella through the area
He swept a handful of dust from a rail on a pedestrian
Walkway, near the end of the bridge about 10 minutes after the fall of the North Tower
He then went to go visit his friend, mr.. Talk wait. I'm sorry what why is this information important?
This is meant to be a scientific paper
And it's given us the backstory of the dust
Why I just say the time and location this dust was collected and when did these two samples get given to Jones
2007
This guy kept it for six years
Okay, what about sample two on the morning of September 12 2001 mr.?
Steven Y of New York City into his room in his apartment on the eighth floor of the really back story again
Looking forward to the part where Jones discusses in great length or the gap year that just took before finally making it to mr.
Steven White's room sample three was collected from an apartment building and submitted in 2008 the last sample was from a Miss Jeannette
McKinley whatever with the paper felt it necessary to talk about her leaving her flat
And then returning a week later to collected a sample for a possible art piece in the future
Why is this important?
But this must have been fantastic dust because Jones traveled to her new home in California to collect the sample himself
I really don't know what these stories are important, but apparently they are because there was a fifth sample
But because the guy didn't want to give his name
They didn't look into it
What I?
Just I just don't understand this you know what I'm not even sure if this information is correct
After watching DPR Jones's video named no Levin was an insect job and checking the original videos myself
I think these dates and stories are kind of incorrect I
Don't know much more about you say you've read the paper not impressed by it. I'm not sorry
No, okay, so what did the journal actually say well, then these dust samples actually found red/gray chips
They apparently have the same make up of thermite
but like I said before thermite can be made from aluminium and iron oxide, that's
Iron aluminium and oxygen that's present in my TV my laptop, and if you count her column I can does
I mean they're all made of thermite
I mean do you think these elements were not present at the World Trade Center?
But now I know you guys so this is thermite yeah
But how much are we actually talking about here?
Well the paper goes on said on the samples that was given in by mass contain point one percent of these red/gray chips
Now I want you to think about that for a sec
point one percent of
the dust contains this
unreactive now know that night to put that in context one kilogram of dust contains one gram of
unreacted
Nano-thermite, I don't forget this paper was implying the nano thermite brought down the towers how much they might do they think that was do
You know I think this is a kind of high percent for a material. That's supposed to burn and explode
Why is there so much unreacted start material in these bloody things and let's not forget they found these regular trips in all the samples
And the chips are only ten to a hundred microns thick Jory think that much could actually burn through steel
I mean for fuck's sake I used 1.5 kilograms to try and burn through my xbox, and it couldn't do it
There is a there is a published here
It's hard to explain to people who are not in the business
But you can usually tell the awesomeness of someone's research depending on where is published for example if you to get something published in nature
Tetrahedron cell science you probably have some pretty awesome research, but that's not the case all the time like with the case with Andrew
Wakefield and the Lancer
But it's a good guide the open chemical physics journal is not a respected journal if you can even call it that
It's one of hundreds of academic journals produced by bentham science publishers
They claim to be peer-reviewed and some people were skeptical so they made fake papers to see if they'd be published
One of them sent him was claiming to be from the center of research and applied phonology
That would be is in the measure of the human skull to determine traits about the person
And if that wasn't enough the acronym is crap, but four months after they submitted it they got an email saying had been accepted
Okay, maybe that's a bit too cryptic so they tried again this time
They who submitted a paper by seijin
Which is a program that generates random computer science research papers including graphs files and citations?
But it's all gibberish when I mean gibberish I mean it makes no sense. It's just words. I mean look at the abstract
What what does this mean? What does it mean and it was accepted?
Yeah, so you're gonna say to me with a straight face that this paper was peer-reviewed. They reported on this
And
You'll know the only thing on the cake following the publication of Jones's paper the open Chemical Physics Journal editor in chief
Resigned saying they have printed this article without my authorization
Kinda sounds like she disputes it and she's not the only one lots of scientists have jumped on the bandwagon and said shenanigans shenanigans
So what do these are the scientists think these red/gray chips are well? They don't know because dr.
Jones and his cohorts wait sir
I shouldn't say them and his
Associates won't give the samples to others to verify their results but that didn't stop a doctor named James
He was able to get four samples of the World Trade Center
Dust these samples were collected and stored by professionals within a month of 9/11
analysis on these samples was performed between November 18 2011 and February 20th 2012
He found the composition of all four samples of the dust chosen blissfully was consistent with World Trade Center
Dust previously published back in 2002 see that's some good science
They're checking that these samples are actually legit and not just relying on people who've said they've kept this dust in their room for six
Years James was also able to isolate these red/gray chips from the dust the match the ones found in Jones's paper
Like the ones in Jones's paper. He put the red/gray chips in several solvents overnight and sonicated them the solvents included methyl chloride
methyl ethyl ketone and to commercial paint strippers the energy dispersive x-ray
spectroscopy of James's sample match the spectra described in Jones's paper the gray layer contained iron in the red lay contained carbon oxygen
Aluminium silicon and iron this is pretty good
Not only for James, but for Jones given his paper a bit more credit because his results were confirmed
However the FTIR spectra of James's sample showed the red layer was consistent with the reference spectra of an epoxy resin
more analysis of the sample using bat scattering electron analysis and scanning electron microscopes
Showed that the gray layer was actually carbon steel and nothing else
the cross section of the red layer showed particles of iron consistent with iron oxide pigments and plates of selenium silicon
Consistent with the reference sample of the claim, but here's the kicker James found no evidence of elemental aluminium particles
None, no elemental aluminium means no thermite or nano thermite
One of the explanations for the red great chips was that it was oh, yeah
Sorry
Sorry about the red chips
I'll be the red/gray chips early on me the first explanations were thieves or paint chips meet off of a primer off of the
girders whatever
They actually tried to prove that
No, it doesn't and if you were to repeat any of Jones's experiment using just iron oxide I can guarantee
It would look identical, but look at this guy in the picture
He obviously knows he's dealing with explosives, which is why he's not wearing any gloves protective clothing
And he's got his face shield up you heat this stuff up, and it explodes. Okay. You don't just find this stuff anywhere
It doesn't naturally occur in building so this stuff was in the building. I wouldn't go in the building okay
Okay, I've been a bit horrible to this guy even if he was a bit of a cheeky fucker and that is how to focus
Sorry hang on
Sorry ya know maybe for Middlesbrough, but I
Was like a boundary
Running down the channel rails if there was no dispute. I there's not many many evidence of molten iron
It was molten iron coming out of the building. I say it's molten. Yeah, but they don't it's very different just footage
I know yeah, I cleaned the footage come out of the top when it's down
But it's very difficult to say if it's iron ore no. It's it could be aluminium. It could be it could be
Oh no
No
It does 9/11 conspiracy theorists claim that the molten material seemed flowing from the South Tower minutes before its collapse as evidence of thermite
According to the truth is this molten material came from one of the scorer
Devices planted either at the point of collapse or on every floor
Which was accidentally ignited these devices were designed to cut with steel beams and allowed the building to collapse?
they also said that fires fueled by office supplies in jet fuel would not be sufficient enough to melt steel and
Therefore this molten material must be iron from the thermite reaction, so what was the explosive thermite?
Inside the World Trade Center wanted to we're all accessible by elevator shaft
every single core column had an elevator shaft in the
Interior going up so what does it take to climb through the top of the elevator?
And there were elevators, but the the footage hunts prior
The elevators were in a constant service
But the the footage of the actual collapse shows that the inner column koala large
Chunk of it survives the initial collapse so for five seconds you just said the coal comes to where the explosives were pod
But when confronted with evidence that contradicts your theory you agree with it in a tone that implies that it backs up your story
What okay looking past?
How you can actually attach these on every single floor without anyone knowing or just on the floors where the point of collapse was happening?
How do you think they could survive the planes coming?
And let's not forget that thermite has never been used to take down a building before but they do have a point
Fires in the South Tower could not been hot enough to melt with steel like I said in my previous video
But they are hot enough to melt aluminium
Aluminium has a melting point of 660 degree Celsius depending on the alloy and jet fuel burns at nine hundred and eighty degrees Celsius
With the vast amount of debris from the aircraft in the northeast corner
The aircraft is about 80 percent aluminium by the way which is about sixty four thousand kilograms
It is more than likely this multi material scene flowing from the top the building is aluminium
But truth is say that aluminium is more with silvery colour like mercury doesn't glow orange
But where did they get this from well looks like they turned to our good old friend dr. Jones?
Liquid aluminum has the property that it's silvery, but rather like aluminum foil
You know and at all temperatures in daylight conditions to debunk this one
It's really easy just run a Google search for molten aluminium. The results show multiple images of the stuff glowing oranges red
It melts but it definitely it definitely goes by red, it's not until it gets to about a thousand
The search even brings up a diagram showing the color of aluminium at different temperatures what's interesting here?
Is that nine hundred and eighty degrees Celsius the temperature which the jet fuel burns aluminium is glowing a light orange?
Just like it is in the video
When people bring down buildings from controlled demolition they use explosives these explosives are really really loud
We don't see that when the Twin Towers came down so truthers believe that it was
Thermite that caused it to come down because when it burns and goes off. It's relatively quiet
talk to Neal and
He's just so
how
destructive these
nano particles are there hi ugly manufactured particles of
Nano thermite. It's a compound. It's not even just some thermite is a
compound with different
Substances that actually create more of a gaseous substance what heels went on about it?
Quite a while, and it just has such an explosive gas. Just force without the bag
I mean the nation
But it's time up to the job well
No, it's really really style, and you need to stupidly large quantities for it to do basically anything
But I had to treat this respond to this is also
Do you ever go on YouTube there's also anything by?
one of the physicists visits teachers from architects and engineers think oh
It's a great thermite debate, and now he just takes backyard thermite
It applies it to girdle
I think I've seen this he made his own girders didn't he and then he blew he made like piston-driven thing
Wow that's that's really impressive my goodness
He's cut through massive chunks of Steel bloody al but then I thought this stuff was used because it was supposed to be quiet
And yet here he has it
Making a larger band because he's got it contained. So why bother to use in sandy areas like Thermae and not high explosives I
Think it's all about keeping things quiet before the main event
Henderson did he say thermate so why bother to use in Sandy areas like Thermae and not high explosives yes
He didn't even show the ingredients one of which is barium nitrate, which makes up around 29% of thermite
Did you not know that you can't interchange?
Thermite and thermite they're different things am I the only one that sees that you can't do
Experiments to prove that one substance is capable of doing something by testing it on another, but why is this ingredients so important?
It's because barium nitrate is extremely toxic and there be no reason to have any of it there at the World Trade Center
If thermo was used to bring down the Twin Towers then both James and Jones
Would have found lots and lots of barium nitrate in their samples
But they don't
and with the quantities in the dust that Jones is talking about the main cause of death from the attacks wouldn't have been from the
Building's collapsing or anything like that. It would have been people dying from breathing in barium nitrate
a
Massive component here is a barium nitrate. That's very nasty compound that is
Well sulfur is kind of yeah, but that's kind of everywhere basically
It's in dry wards, and you it's in planters and all sorts
But the barium nitrate one thing that they people claim that you need just isn't then there's no barium oxide
Which is what happens after it goes off it decomposes into that and that's also very nasty stuff
And that would if you've got any trace of that that would be an eyebrow rot from me
but I there was none that actually you found so I
Okay the poor konzern and the center of the debris very it's very so you can see where they were
Okay
Is that when I seen videos of?
Demolition companies right and they show you like how they how they set up a building, and it said the charges on
The building
Here's the picture he was talking about and here's the reason behind it. It's really obvious that these cuts were made after the towers collapsed
How do I know this because you can run a Google search for?
images of Ground Zero the day after and it will show you the same images
But without them having these cuts in but I want you to think about it if you're from the school where these cuts were made
Where the plane went in the building actually?
Collapsed then you'd expect to find them there and not on the ground and get in so that doesn't really make any sense
Oh if you're from the school live well
They blew up all over the building there were charges on every single floor, then you wouldn't expect them
Just to have these cuts at things in this one place. You'd expect every single beam to have that and yet
We don't see that in any of the images, and I know now people are going to show me this image
And I have to say this is not the perimeter wall. This is aluminum cladding. That's falling off the building
You're an idiot
Great video, I'm not convinced 9/11 was an inside job
This video is a disgrace and an insult to the truth and those who died that day
The make of this video is literally pissing on the graves of those who were murdered in the tragic event by making a mockery of
The truth and the scientific facts of what really happened you should be ashamed
These guys are being paid off by someone or truly an idiot 100 percent false flag operation
OMG your voice is so sick just the way you narrate your cheap own videos oMG
I feel so disgusted because of you and your pathetic video your voice is so
Meant for vomiting jeez from where the fuck are you keep believing that Santa brings you the gifts to your paternity you?
Speak like a man you ought to be ashamed of yourself for making these morning videos
You know I'm better and yet you deliberately lie and spew this nonsense and indeed you are part of the cancer
Which must be eliminated from the earth, you're wasted ten minutes of my life. What about the BBC reporting building 7 collapse?
45 minutes before it fell knocking your video about World Trade Center building 7
Which wasn't hit by a plane?
Why and how exactly did World Trade Center building 7 come down fire from nearby buildings?
Building 7 as well disturbs me. What about building number seven then mile 2 UK
Wow, I get it a lot of you want me to talk about some building that was north of the Twin Towers
And you're not the only ones a lot of people in Manhattan Hyundai also spent a great portion of their time
Talking about World Trade Center 7 when I speak to people and they talk to me about
Buildings 1 & 2 that went down as if it was control
And they tell me that the reason they went down like that is because planes are them
I then asked them how did they then explain building seven coming down in exactly the same way it wasn't hit by a
So I have a question about that
I have many many many questions, and there are no answers, so I'm here strictly to keep the question a lot
How do you feel the World Trade Center 7 ties in with everything then I mean?
Right into its own footprint straight down which is every
parameter or
Criteria of a controlled demolition and was not hit by a place
And most Americans are not even aware of this you holding a sign that says remember building seven I can explain why that is?
Because they didn't even mention it in the 9/11 Commission
Totally a minute
People don't even know that there was the building that fell bad. It didn't get hit by a plane the 9/11
Commission report didn't mention World Trade Center 7
So let's make a stalinís the original World Trade Center 7 was a forty seven story building completed in
1987 and said 110 meters north of World Trade Center one above the con-ed substation
And it was destroyed in the 2001 attacks the first question
I get is why was it not mentioned in the 9/11 Commission report well because the Commission report isn't an engineering port
That's the NIST report
the 9/11 Commission report was to investigate why the attacks occurred and to make
Recommendations to how to prevent them in the future and as World Trade Center 7 wasn't a terrorist target
It didn't look into it
But let's not forget that it wasn't the only building to be destroyed in that day that wasn't investigated by the 9/11 Commission report
For example World Trade Center 3 it was a 22 story still framed hotel. That was between the two twin towers
It was broken in half after the collapse of World Trade Center 2 before being essentially completely destroyed
From falling debris from World Trade Center 1 and his collapse was also not investigated by the report
That's because it too wasn't a target so how does this NIST report this engineer important think that World Trade Center 7 collapsed?
fire
That's it
It's that simple fires that are allowed to burn for so long caused the building to fail
The fires at World Trade Center 7 were ignited as a result of the impact from the debris
from the collapse of World Trade Center 1
The debris also caused structural damage to the southwest exterior of World Trade Center 7 primarily between floors 7 and 17
with several exterior columns severed pfizer ignited on many floors
However only the fires on floors 7 8 9 11 12 and 13 grew and lasted until the time the building collapsed
truthers often show pictures of World Trade Center 7 facing south and it looks another light looks in good condition
It looks and damaged but images from the actual south of the building looking north show a very different story
So why were the fires in World Trade Center 7 not controlled by the sprinkler system?
well they were and they weren't the collapse of the twin towers damaged the
Primary water source of the sprinkler system from the lower 20 floors with sprinkler system working the fires can be contained
Over the source of the water for the sprinkler system above this floor was fed
By overhead tanks on the top of the building many people say that these fires could have been possibly be fueled by
Fuel from oil used to power emergency electric power generators, however
This is not the case because the majority of the fuel was actually found after the building collapsed it
Also had to produce large amounts of visible smoke that would have came from these exhaust vents lower down in building
But we don't see them, so what happened well. Let's look at the footage that the truth is normally show
This is extremely misleading because only shows the end part the collapse the video is actually
Much longer and shows the penthouse at the top left collapsing before the building does
So what's happening here to understand you have to have a little bit of knowledge of the building structure from the seventh floor to the
47th floor World Trade Center 7 was supported by 24 interior columns and
58 perimeter columns as you can see the building was not symmetrical 21 of the interior columns formed a rectangular
building core the remaining three interior columns column 79
80 and 81 were a particular lot as they had to support for the long floor spans on the east side of the building
fire induced thermal expansion of the floor system surrounding
column 79
Led to a collapse of floor 13 this triggered a cascade of floor failures all the way down to the much stronger fifth floor
this left column 79
unsupported and therefore buckled eastward and collapsed the effects of this can clearly be seen in the video as the East penthouse was directly above
Column 79 when it collapsed so did the penthouse and again?
I have to stress the dishonesty of truthless for not showing this in the majority of their videos the load of the building was then
redistributed onto adjacent columns
Which were also having to deal with debris falling on them this led to column 80
And then 81 buckling as well which led to all the floors on the east side
Collapsing leaving the e solidly building essentially just a hollow shell
failure of the interior columns then proceeded towards the west because of loss of lateral support and
falling debris and as the exterior columns were still standing it funneled in all the debris down accounting for the
relatively neat pile of rubble at the end with now the
essentially the whole of the core of the building falling all you're left with is this outer shell of World Trade Center 7
Which you can see and the perimeter columns could no longer support own weight
So it began to buckle between floors 7 and 14, and the entire building came down as one single unit
To say like a lot of truth or to say that the buildings fell in around 6. Seconds is just
wrong and
They know it's wrong, but one thing. They do say is well World Trade Center 7 fell at freefall and did it
Yes
It did well part of it did the west side at least did for about two point two five
Seconds now remember at this point you're looking at what?
Essentially is a hollowed-out shell of the building and like I said before the building buckle between the 7th and 14th floors the perimeter columns
Either bowed outwards all completely broke off and they provided negligible resistance for these seven floors
Which is why you see this speed until the 40th floor hit the 7th floor and experienced more resistance and the building slowed down
No evidence for explosions were ever found in the wreckage of World Trade Center 7 and again
I feel I have to stress that no thermal or nano thermite of any aluminium and iron oxide variation was found because there was no
elemental aluminium found
There's also no sound of explosions made which is a trademark of controlled demolition?
World Trade Center seven having all that information on the CIA and all those people in it and that building just comes down
Freefall speed not even tipped by anything
first building ever to fall from truck 405 one of the arguments that
9/11 truthers often say is that World Trade Center 1 2 & 7 were the first steel frame structures to collapse because of fire
Ignoring the fact that buildings wanted to had massive planes going to the side of them are they right about World Trade Center 7 is
It the first ever steel
Building to collapse because of fire alone well a little bit of research shows that actually in the past many steel frame structures have collapsed
Because of fire alone these include dogwood elementary school winds a tower and a faculty of engineering building
But you know what these examples take a while to find
So if only there was another example of a collapse or a partial collapse much closer to home
Say like World Trade Center 5 yes believe or not truth
Is there was a World Trade Center 3 4 5 & 6?
I know it sounds crazy
World Trade Center 5 was a nine-story building that stood east of the North Tower the building was actually the least damaged of the complex
But suffered partial collapse due to impact from steel debris falling from World Trade Center 1 and
Due to fire
Four floors inside the building collapsed when some of the connections between the structure and steel beams failed it amazes me that
9/11 truthers say that steel structures can't collapse due to fire alone when there is another example in the World Trade Center complex
But I'm sure truthers have a reasonable explanation for the damage of the World Trade Center 5 say like a Star Wars beam weapon
yeah, it's going to absorb that for a sec a
Death laser from space. I'm not making this up some people actually believe this
But I think I'm getting off-topic here
I'm not gonna talk about death lasers so back to World Trade Center 7 and what interesting you're from England
Yep, the BBC had a reporter on the I know she that was a bit of reported building seven collapsing at five o'clock
And it was there in the background still standing it came down at 5:20
She got her CI information wrong
And steel girders the size of you and me how can they suddenly disappear in ten seconds
so going back is like are you saying that the BBC are talking to the CIA and they were giving information to
The BBC was getting it and they reported too soon
I'm not sure exactly we gave them a false flag news
now more on the latest building collapse in New York
You might have heard a few moments ago was talking about the Salomon Brothers building
collapsing and indeed it has apparently that's only a few hundred yards away from where the
World Trade Center towers were and it seems that this was not a result of a new attack
It was because the building had been weakened
During this morning's attacks. We'll probably find out more now about that from our correspondent Jane Standley Jane
What more can you tell us about the Sullivan brothers building and its collapse?
Well only really what you already know too details are very very sketchy
there's almost a sense down town in New York behind me down by the World Trade Centers of
Just an area completely closed off as the rescue workers try to do their job now. I love the BBC
How could you not love a corporation who gave the world Doctor Who but I know they're not perfect
And they were not the only ones to get the information wrong that day others reported that bombs were found flight
93 landed safely, etc, etc, but what are they really suggesting here did the BBC a foreign broadcast cooperation were in on it?
what would they hope to get from a company whose main source of revenue primarily comes from a TV license a
License that you have to pay by law if you have a TV
Capable of picking up signal what about the civilian employees at the BBC?
How could they keep them from spilling the beans did they sit them down and make them swear an oath of secrecy under a picture?
Of the Queen and what would be the point of telling the media in the first place if you did such a fantastic job
Making it look like two planes crashed into two buildings. They collapsed, and I honestly just don't
Understand so what else do you have truth is?
He said
I
Think he says afterwards that he meant just to get rid of people out there
To go away from her because it was creaking it was making noises
and he already had so much loss of life already on that morning that they I guess he thought we better just you know I
Remember getting a call from the fire department commander telling me that they were not sure they're gonna be able to contain the fire I
Said you know we've had such terrible loss of life
In this Madison's doors his Politan
And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse
So apparently Larry Silverman said pull it but if you watch the original video
He's clearly talking about getting people away from danger, and the most interesting part about watching the video is it's not a direct quote from
2001 it's a year later with him in an interview
He's quoting himself and not only is this woman at Ground Zero taking the quote completely out of context
She's also getting it wrong
He never said he was the one to make that decision to pull it he says they made the decision to pull it meaning someone
Announced it, but even if he did say pull it and he meant to bring it down by controlled demolition
What does this even mean does it mean that he ordered?
Firefighters to go into a burning World Trade Center 7 to set up quite explosives that are undetectable and Leave, No Trace
in a matter of hours
Did you mean the World Trade Center 7 was already set up with explosives?
And he's telling people to set it off to all buildings in lower Manhattan have like a Star Trek ask destruct system
But why why bring down an empty building hours after the main attack?
How does a planned demolition of one building prove that the Twin Towers were deliberately brought down?
What would anyone get from this? How does the collapse of World Trade Center 7 prove anything?
Okay
My question be though why do you think building 7 though particular?
I can kind of see maybe it was a conspiracy theory going on the like buildings 1 & 2
But why do you think 7?
I think yeah, I mean I could suppose that it had something to do with the residents of that building, but I don't know
I don't know why they would bring building seven down
Okay, and what do you think it leads onto though?
Like if you're here to saying remember building seven you must be implying that it must be some reason why?
Yes the official explanation
This is normal office fires. That's not the man's word
That's why a steel skyscraper, but
What does that mean though that this one building that wasn't?
Hit by a plane. What are you inferring by that coming down?
I
Wish you agreed to go on there
Saying that the official story is not true
The story's not true think common sense says
We have a big problem here
if there's information in there
it's best way to just get rid of it III would say no because
Like a shredder is perfectly code, and you can destroy stuff really easily
I mean leaving it in a pile where
Hundreds of thousands if not thousands of people came down even x8 to help out and they'll be rooting all through this kind of stuff
And last thing you want is
You know a load of tickets for playing receipts and stuff like that so it may be the best way you wouldn't be to
deliverability again it seems very Bond villain ask like to
Other than the most inefficient or elaborate way of destroying data the truth has came up with nothing
Oh they danced around the question and said something else
I found this
Absolutely astonishing because they kept talking about it as if it was what they said it was the smoking gun it proves everything
But what does it prove and this was my first question, and it should be the first question of every logical thinking person?
What would be the point behind it and what does it show and they can't answer it the second question should be what is that?
Picture you're holding
Never forget that go
The symbol of the devil's an agenda troll over Iraq Great War the criminal plane goes this way the elephant's went that way
How can the Pentagon be attacked the most protected building in the world because it was a-standin when this man was
Sitting in a photo op for 20 minutes. He should have been whisked out the school evacuated. It was a legitimate attack
He's on record of saying oh, I saw the first payment and because they had monitoring it and they make this whole thing happen
We know this the world knows
it's pretty obvious why I always subscribe to the
Cock up before conspiracy lying, which maybe I know when use reasons like that
Yeah, they conspired, but we're not we're it were the truth activists. We're into evidence
We have a pile of evidence and truth versus there are smoke and mirrors
So what does this treaty speak of what evidence? Do you have or lack of regarding the attacks at the Pentagon?
It wasn't a plane it was a torpedo because there was no cadaver or fuselage at the at the Pentagon this torpedo D. Means a
Unmanned plane or a missile with some type of drone, but they actually have thoughts from the plane
Well they they showed the five frame clip
And are under seal doesn't that the video of that day are not allowed to be seen by the public
But once more those five frames do not show plane even
And FoxNews saw that footage and said I don't see a plane there. Yeah, this is a recurring thing from truthers. I really really dislike
Basically doze if there's no video of an event happening, then it didn't happen all something dodgy is going on for example
There's no footage of the collapse of World Trade Center 7 from the south
So I guess it must have been brought down by some controlled demolition or something
There's no footage of fireballs going down the elevator shafts in the World Trade Center Twin Towers
So I guess it must have been bombs
And there's no footage of a plane hitting the Pentagon so I guess it must have been some kind of missile
But is there actually footage of the plane hit in the Pentagon how about these 5 frames? He was talking about well first
let's have a look at the path the plane actually took before it hit the Pentagon you can see that it actually hit 5
lampposts before actually finally crashing into the side of it and
Somewhere along the line one of these lampposts actually damaged part of the engine and the water
Stopped smoke start to come out of it, but is there actually footage of the plane hitting the Pentagon
But
The footage clearly show is something with the dimensions of a plane and a large fin coming into shot
Now to my knowledge. There is no torpedo or small miss out of the size of a plane
I remember this thing was pretty big because it hit down a load of lampposts before actually hitting the side of it
But what the truth is say when confronted with this what about the?
Lampposts
The plane when it came down didn't it hit about five lampposts, and then I had a generator
But you know we just saw a report by a researcher named
Explained that
scientifically if the plane had hit those posts
Those planes were reported to have fuels in the wings that were those tanks before those were many keep
those planes going to that speed and hit those lampposts there would have been huge explosions from the wings or
From the five frames if you kind of work out if there's a plane there
it does look like it's it's quite badly damaged the plane is it's an in it's
Giving up a lot of white smoke if you say
No, but I'd say it was because it was damaged that it won the
Jet was giving off quite a bit of smoke, and that's why some people say well
it did hit these things knows the evidence that showed it the funny thing is to believe that a
Missile hit the Pentagon, and it was ordered by the American government
You have to believe that a conversation like this must have happened
So I'm just checking have we got everything sorted for these attacks that we're going to you know do on September 11th
Yes, we do sir. Okay cool, so just to check we have the buildings in Manhattan the two Twin Towers
We have them hooked up with this super duper nano thermite. That is
untraceable and
Undetectable and also doesn't have very nitrate and doesn't need other elemental on you minion
We we have that sorted do we yes we do sir
That's amazing and you know I don't know be cheap about this
It is the overly expensive kind that you know is really inefficient and leaves about
0.1% of the start material in the dust because you know we don't do things by Harvey
I want to you know I wanted to be lavish. Yes. We do sir. Oh. We'll remember train. This is very important
We have to hook up World Trade Center seven with the same stuff. It's very important, Janey
I can't stress it enough we need the same stuff to be in that building over. There as well. You got it. Yes
Yes, sir
I've
Done that and I've also told the owner of the building about it and a few news people so they can report about it when?
It finally collapses my only worry about that
Is that someone might you know accidentally let it slip a little bit early as some mighty fine vice-presidents mint chip
You've got going on there Chaney mighty fine. I thank you sir. Okay, cool. Well. We've got it pretty much all sorted
We've got one plane hit in the field and another one hitting the Pentagon. We are done now. Oh, yes, sir sir about that yeah
Bad news our budget doesn't stretch that much and we can't afford a fourth plane to hit the Pentagon. What do you mean?
We can't afford a fourth plane to him. What what do you mean? We could wait a bloody America?
How could we not afford a fourth plane to hit the Pentagon? I know it's the budget, so we just don't have the money
What this doesn't make any sense? This is the most complicated plan?
We have ever anyone who's ever done sir anyone in the world has ever done
And you were telling me that at the last moment we can't afford a fourth plane to hit the Pentagon
I mean bloody hell Cheney. I know sir, but I I have a way around it well fine. What is your way around him?
we're gonna fire a missile into the Pentagon a
Miss I heard you yes, yeah, I heard you. Yeah a missile bloody hell Cheney
How is that gonna work a missile looks nothing like a plane? They're a lot smaller they?
Explode with the explosion stuff people are gonna be seeing this and saying hey that wasn't a plane that was a missile
And then they're gonna think where did that come from I know sir, but this is fantastic
We have this new missile
technology that when you fire into a building it will actually take out all the lamp posts within a certain person D
It's it's very high-tech sir, okay
Well at least that's something also sir it has a massive fin, and is the same dimensions as a plane, okay?
That's it what we can afford this massive missile, but we can't afford a plane
I I know it sounds odd, sir
But it's it's a way the budget works you see we have a lot of money for paying off like
firemen and your police department
People and also we have some money set sights there in 11 years time youtubers can make videos about this kind of stuff
Too you know we call them disinfo agents, but what we just don't have enough money for a new plane. That's that's ridiculous
That's absolutely ridiculous, and what's gonna happen. You know when people look at afterwards. They're not gonna see wreckage of a plane
They're gonna see wreckage of this bloody torpedo thing. Oh, it's okay, so we got that covered we are gonna
Have a load of actors outside, which we're going to actually give parts of a plane to and so when the media comes
Beforehand they would have dropped it on the floor and say they saw a plane hit it
But hang in a sec where we're getting parts of a plane from oh, we have one in storage
We're gonna take it apart wait what we have we can't afford a plane
but we can afford to damage and destroy a plane and some massive miss our plane and
This this does make any sense Jenny trust me sir. No one will see this. You know. It's it's perfect
It will be perfect, so just trust me can't we just you know
Smuggle in a nuclear weapon into the country that we want to invade
No, I don't think that work at all sir
Hey guys, it's me miles and this video is going to be a little bit different from the rest of them
It's gonna be basically talking about the psychology behind the truth that why do they believe what they believe
Basically now. I have no psychology background whatsoever, but I do notice the one who does
Hi, I'm Dave, and I own a a psychology researcher
I'm invited here by miles to explain some of the theory behind why people believe in conspiracy theories
Despite what you may think people who believe this Buddhist theories aren't actually any more stupid or insane than the rest of us
for instance there's no relationship between IQ and I believe the conspiracy theories nor do they show any
especially delusional thinking you might associate become schizophrenia or psychosis
nevertheless
As you guys see something in some of the videos it seems to be trapped in what's called a kind of monological bully system
So a system where everything is conspiracy theory it's no matter why information
They get it all ends up being incorporate into this belief system where there's a giant conspiracy
Against them in the world and the question is why is this as if anything in psychology?
And there's never one straight answer and as old
There's a series of perspectives that kind of come together to form coherent picture
But I'm going to go through some of the more consistent findings from the literature
It's officially if number two focus on kind of what personality traits, or what's individual characteristics makes one more light blue think it's motivators
First is you might imagine people of the conspiracy theories tend to be more mistrustful of other people and particularly of higher octave
Know
What's quite interesting is they also tend to have was called noir for its having personality?
Which means actually they tend to be more willing to believe in and follow strong leaders?
and then what they want things to be
Regimented things to have like an order and also tend to blame other people for their problems
And this will come into focus or a bit later
Perhaps the most consistent finding though across many studies is the effects of locus of control and a sense of powerlessness?
So it looks the control is how much you think your life is in your own desk and for example?
Let's say you were late to work one day
someone who has an INT a high internal locus of control
Would maybe think that it was a well-informed pessimist snooze button once many times
For waiting to have a piece of toast rather than grabbing say in breakfast bar
And they didn't account for the traffic over
song with an external locus of control
would blame over people's driving because in the traffic would say it was the alarm clocks fall from awakened lock in time and so and
So forth so they externalize the causes are venting habit well
This kind of looks people win from amenities the kind of a sense of powerlessness when anything serious happens because as far as they're concerned
Then I control all the room lines
And of course 911 isn't it was a incredibly dramatic
emotional and serious of them they can see how if you only had this
externalized view of the world that you have no control of it when a truly terrifying event happens and
You know it generates a high level of anxiety
And this anxiety then gets manifested in this kind of belief in conspiracy theories as one research Potter
Conspiracy theories were convenient alternative to an uncertain world
So I mentioned parlors that specifically so how do we know this well firstly of course we can come correlate so?
We take personality measures of saying powerlessness and feelings of looks of control
And we relate this to how willing people are to even make expensive theories
But more interesting is a fascinating they'll experiment
They involve priming and primary is essentially where you get someone to think about something before taking an experiment
in this case and
The research has got participants to think about the kind of the global economic situation so nothing to do with conspiracy theories as such
They got them to think about how
They have no control over kind of money markets about investment about what use multinational
Do ie that?
They are powerless to control their own lives and lo and behold
When people will ask do they believe in conspiracy theories
they were more likely to in the condition when they were asked to feel powerless will have to imagine an uncertain and
Case it would probably say
We are the terrorism although people that simply you know everyone has a different level of locus of control
And a sense of powerlessness and this can also come from you know legitimate circumstance
so if you are particularly poor
If you have quite had a battle ID you are legitimately powerless what it seems to be these kind of people that both are as
A characteristic themselves have this as a motor control and feel situation when they are powerless and drawn to conspiracy theories as an explanation
as I say
For someone who has high anxiety about like they're not in control of their life believe me an all-powerful shadow government is a convenient alternative
Thinking this was a terrifying event that no one could have predicted
Okay, so the second thing we're going to look at is kind of more cognitive approach
What is about the thinking style that makes one more lines believe in conspiracy fingers?
And one thing is how we attribute calls to an event so
Humans we tend to ascribe things one or two ways he was
Situational so based on the context, or what's called disposition which is based on a broad character sweeps and for example
Let's say your friend Kevin crashes his car
You might describe that situation that he was tired that the weather conditions were bad
But the brakes on his car was failing so you'd give kind of these complex situational reasons to why an event occurred
Alternatively interestingly if it was a stranger the hit coming you like to say that person's a terrible driver
Or worse - laughs that what this is called is a fundamental attribution error, and this is our tendency to attribute
Causing about the causes of action to this kind of generalized dispositional threat rather than focusing on the context
And why well focusing on the situation the concept is basically quite hard, so we tend not to do it
Well, how does this way to conspiracy feel specifically so we take an example from 77 rather than 9/11 although the law examples of 9/11?
Is comes into play so main conspiracy theory is based on a report from a woman who said?
That it felt as if the the tube trains of the underground came and lifted up the trucks
And they've taken this to say well that semanas from the spirit if it wasn't a suicide bombing was mi5 planted bomb, Atlanta
And this is dispositional thinking it. There's a conspiracy so what she said is related a conspiracy. Where was a situational look at that event
would say well here's a
Survive victim who was caught in this explosion who?
Moments ago almost lost her life in a tiny tube full of smoke and flame
What want you to say that her? I where's testimony is at all accurate and I'll be a situation Western nation
But that takes looking at kind of the new shine rather than saying it's a conspiracy theory is
Basically simple and when psychologists have looked at this kind of attribution error we find that firstly we always tend towards
dispositional because it's easier essentially and it's especially true when we're in a hurry or
when
We have for instance high emotion for it as anxiety and fear, so you can see you later
I said previously about personality if you have individuals are particularly fearful or anxious
There's something more lights make sweeping generalizations and see all host of different sporadic individual events as part of this one whole like
Disposition so meta conspiracy rather let's see each in turn and we saw a little bit of this four people discussing
how the buildings fell down
Someone's about their own ideas on the only together some building seven the two towers and stuff however
They can see that because it's saying it's a conspiracies easier where we was looking at independently so you know fire melting point of steel
The structure of the building debris the following is complicated, and it takes essentially an effort
And the problem is that once we are caught in this dispersal mode of thinking is actually quite hard to switch now
And the second thing will all become M is called the confirmation bias
And to say that conspiracy
Pharisees the confirmation bias is a bit like saying that a nuclear weapon makes a better mess when he goes up and
For those that don't know the confirmation bias is the tendency to attend?
to information that agrees with us and ignore information that disagrees yours and
Clearly we can see this in these conspiracy theory and videos and these beliefs is
You know no matter what have misrepresented with they very quickly dismiss or ignore Betemit have seen evidence
It's come to their opinion and focus on tiny little details that no one else who is kind of thinking more critically
Would say well, that's just you know coincidence or bad timing
Yeah, we've corrected you Barney was the 11
Colonized stated you might
Sorry my my American history is very bad
MidFirst by flight learning the Pentagon 77 people hit by flight 77 okay
so the Las Vega
Babe briefly into these kind of a social the social identity aspects are conspiratorial believes because obviously these people aren't alone partly
Thanks to the Internet you can connect with thousands hundreds possibly
Hopefully not millions of people that believe the same thing this you for the question is you've got these people that are scared
That have kind of have these are making these cognitive biases that we all do but I've drove them to all conspiracy theories
But even though you think you'd be able to convince some people I mean indeed if there was a very good documentary
But I suppose if it was on BBC recently this shows some people can be convinced so what?
Separates those that can be convinced by basically pure
Evidence from those that were refused to admit that they're wrong about things wrong or that anything might
Simply be not as they say and what ice plays for this and is related to what's called social identity theory
And this is the idea that we all have identities that we claim to our self-esteem depends on so for instance
I'm a researcher psychologist a
Son a twin and brother people come you know mothers fathers office workers your job the support you like the games you play
The closure part of these are form different identities in become part of us
So what you have to realize is that when my house was in New York?
challenging these people
He wasn't having an academic debate with them as such it wasn't a case where I have
Information you have information, and then we'll see who's right
Then we'll change you know how conclusively based on this and I might change my opinion is you're essentially attacking someone's identity
They are a conspiracy theories
They're the truth they believe that there's a shadow government involved in you know one of the greatest terrorist attacks in history
That you're a terrorist banana, it's it's very uncomfortable to know that don't make my part of elements within
And you're not going to convince them by giving them evidence because you're basically attacking who they are just not what many believe
This is one of the kind of missing things in cannon
Conspiracy research is you're now Trump one join a community of your inner
Community and whenever you get a group that has this kind of biological belief
it simply gets more and more extreme so
inconsistencies in the
Argument, are we do to help people? Who don't believe stuff are weeded out and it's really hard to go against the grain
It's go particles. Say well. I don't believe this anymore this isn't true. I've been convinced because you're surrounded by people
Vance you know believe differently you know like possibly nearly
I'd say almost 100 years of psychology research inside the effects of group behavior
Has constantly showed how we know we can form those around as well our friends believe what my society believes, and if you're in this
Monological belief system you're not going to change it there's also kind of quite when it comes to self esteem
Which I don't want to bring you I'd always say
This is a main point because it's kind of unfairly late, but a lot of these troopers
Who are genuine individuals that kind of believe something happened, but?
As well as it being as well as completing Aspira see fairies being a convenient alternative to uncertain world
It is also a convenient alternative to blind hate
So for instance and one the conspiracy phase emotional our clue is it now in the community
was about kind of jews in the twin towers getting calls from our son saying don't come in today and
You don't have to be Sherlock Holmes to work out
What?
Pre-existing prejudice is based on so we always have to be careful if so while many conspiracy theories obviously just believing
They shall go on to the death
there's also some people that are using it to enhance their own prejudice or sense of insecurity and
The reason conspiracy feels it's useful for this is because in our modern world you can't simply admit
You're anti-semitic or racist or whatever, but if you kind of transfer that and say I'm not being anti-semitic
But here's the evidence that Mossad was involved in this you have a legitimate if you like
Way of expressing your purchase and again. I don't to say this too
Heavily because it would unfairly like kind of by I suppose against cuz boobs first Angelica
They don't all believe this that most of my genuine people that kind of believe in the truth
But it is an important point to consider whenever you hear people speaking the behind of number of exposes there may be kind of underlying
Prejudices on the mistrust okay, there is one last point about the social aspect. I think is quite important and
This is related to
the the idea of a trucked in this animals complete system
And this is that if you believe in one conspiracy theory you're more likely to believe in all of it at myself possibly
That could have been killed killed by these
murdering maniacs and power who continue power and give these puppets like Mitt Romney and Obama by my chance of the Oval Office
So long as they do their bidding. They probably say don't forget JFK
RFK him okay
You've lost me that what does JFK had to do with JFK was a president that had press releases of the press?
Standing intelligent guy want to get off the Federal Reserve
And he was shot and obviously look at this a brooder film the bullet of criminal bullet came to the front because his head is
Not backwards, but they make it look like Oswald did it from behind
if there was two bums of shooters on the grassy knoll and Nixon and
Bush were CIA operatives hitmen at that time in Texas
And they might have been the guys that were actually offed him so that they get a shot at the Oval Office White House
That's my idea. I don't know it seems if you put two and two together line up the ducks. You can see where they lead
The
President would
Say four questions
I have no answers
But they have questions remain that have never been answered nothing hold country with views so for instance
and tell us about self-esteem maintenance, and if you sitting disability fairly kind of
Community often now people are quite vague about it
Why because the indica space where there's lots of different ideas so I think he was in flight 51 the wrong the crashed in Pennsylvania
Some people said I was shot down so people say we never crashed and became even the crash was fate
So how can these people be in a community at the same time well they simply?
Ignore it they having a certain level cognitive dissonance. This way you can believe two things at the same time
To help them maintain this community and thus no self esteem
In example this is a great piece of research that ask participants
Hope you believe in conspiracy theories and lots of different alternative views of conspiracy so for instance
And bin Laden is alive and well and still alive you know like while living in Pakistan or whatever
Although he actually died in 2000. He's the scapegoat and people that believe that he was a scapegoat
You know he was already dead at the time of 9/11
Also believe he was still alive, and this is because they weren't focusing on this specific belief as such
But actually we just have this generalized
Kind of cognitive bubble of it's a conspiracy and therefore anything made sense as long as it's fitted within their conspiracy framework
Ok so that's a very brief introduction to the psychology if you like of conspiracy theorists
Obviously some extent affliction is far more complicated salivating you know, but they seem to be the main points
Serve an individual characteristics points of view
Indivisibly conspiracy families tend to have this external locus of control and also tend to feel more
Powerless the either Joseph's an internal feeling or me actually been a position as that they are actually more
Powerless and other people from a cognitive approach that kind of critical thinking skills
They're making two fundamental by errors and first is this attribution error so they're tending to assign
Dispositional causes that are kind of easy to explain versus situation cause which are harder to explain, and they're also showing quite considerable
confirmation bucket
So this is where as I say you simply ignore all evidence the country your own personal opinion
And lastly in terms of kind of social
The idea here is that because the disparity theories part that identity there are true for fighting and uncaring unfeeling
Government there any attack on the evidence of conspiracy theory isn't as attack on their kind of research model
It's an attack on them themselves an attack on their identity your attacking them as a person and that this is quite powerful in
Keeping people within that community
And and there's a one final point I'd like to make so we can laughter these people
You know will be doing in these videos
Let's say you know what the meant to point out the floors to be saying in their thinking
Or are they basically harmless and the problem is the answer is no
Must be the main problem is well
Yes
If you believe in conspiracy theories are more like to believe another one and this obviously conforms this idea that they're trucks in this kind
Of cognitive bubble where everything is a conspiracy?
But house more important one of the greatest predicts the belief conspiracy. Theory is simple exposure
So if you've been exposed people talk about conspiracy theories you're more like to believe one yourself
When it's offered to you about an important or terrifying event
And this is actually quite important because it relates to really important issues are today such as climate change of global warming
kind of green energy
You know this whole it's a home to called by scientist and and things such as kind of vaccinations sort of MMR aid treatments
But just being exposed to other people's conspiracy theories is more likely to make you doubt the accepted wisdom on all these types of events
So in that case these people that want the truth that talk about shadow
Governments are not being told like you know the trooper politicians. They're not simply Karla's crannis all well-meaning individuals
They are even if they're inadvertently dealing it potentially harming quite a lots of people
Hey guys. It's me Mars and welcome to part 7 of my 911 miniseries
I honestly can't believe that I've now made seven of these bloody videos because originally it was only going to be one video
150 minute one video
But unfortunately these guys in lower Manhattan, are they just kept firing more and more information at me that I decided well
I've got too much stuff here now
I'm gonna have to make it three videos and then the comments section people just kept firing more and more bloody information at me that
Was like right, it's gonna have to be five and six and now seven and it's running for well over an hour
So if you watch them all thank you very much, thank ya anyway this video in particular is gonna contain no science
what's whether it's just going to be me talking to a camera for about ten minutes about my final thoughts in the whole situation and
Also to clear up some misconceptions
Firstly believe or not I want to say thank you to the New York truthers that day because you were actually really kind and really
Friendly you know a lot of people don't like having a camera pushed in their face and asked quite a lot of questions
But you guys didn't seem to mind it you never once raised your voice at me
You never once got angry at me, or insulted me. You were actually really nice
So you know you are actually some of the nicest New Yorkers
I met on my travels
And you even invited me to the pub afterwards which was
Mighty kind of you now a lot of people in the comments have criticized the people I talked to these truthers in lower
Manhattan they said well, you know why didn't you talk to any architects or engineers that well?
It's very simple to answer because there were no architects or engineers there
and I think that says a lot more about your movement that it does my interviewing technique and also I
Picked these people I did cherry-pick these people I picked them because I thought they showed
The best that the truth of movement had if I wanted to I could have went one blow up in the one block one block
North and talk to crazy people who were just screaming
Walking by about knowing that been an inside job, and that Jews being behind it
But I also knew these people wouldn't be completely informed
So I had one rule one simple rule which was if they didn't mention it
I
can talk about it so for example if a true third dimension World Trade Center seven I couldn't bring it up in conversation if they
Didn't mention thermo. I can bring up in conversation
This is why none of the videos contain any information about flight 93 because no truth is brought it up
I couldn't talk about but the general conspiracy theories go something like this there was no plane wreckage found
There was no bodies or body parts found and it was shot down
Yes, the plane was found majority the plane was found yes
They found all the people who are on board that plane they found
But they were able to identify parts of them
and
No
It wasn't from down there was no evidence whatsoever being of it being shot down and even if it was how'd that prove your crazy
Theory even with my one rule I was shocked at how little information some people knew when
For example the woman in red who's holding the sign says remember World Trade Center
What a side question you know on that she didn't have a clue what she was talking about
I actually had to turn the camera off because I felt embarrassed talking to her
Another thing that surprised me that day was the number of truthers who were actually there
there's only about 40 and you remember Manhattan is one of the
Most populated cities in the entire world I was there on the anniversary of September 11th outside Ground Zero and the truth movement could
Only get 40 people and that's that's probably overestimating anyway
That's enough about the truth is who were at Ground Zero that day. I want to talk about the guys
Who've been writing blog posts about me and?
Recording videos about me and also the people who my friends
And I affectionately called the armchair truth is who resides in the comments. Let's start for the video responses now
I've only really got to there directed towards me the first one the guys research didn't go as far as to get my name correct
And he kept calling me DPR Germans
Yeah, the second one was from a guy who had about as much charisma and enthusiasm as a dead Hedgehog
He also said really ridiculous things in his video like the Twin Towers the fires in them didn't reach over
260 degrees Celsius you also cut out the part where I said the World Trade Center bowed inward and said that there was no
footage or images of this Boeing
But you must have seen it he cut it out and the third thing he said is by Occam's razor if you hear explosion
It's an explosive
Amazing next I want to talk about the blog post now. I've actually got a post about me on debunking the debunkers or whatever and
It's amazing I wore this as a badger ball
And I sent it to all my friends and all my family members saying look at this. This is amazing this hot this guy
Spent a lot of time writing and writing and writing this stuff about me
And I can tell you what not one of them finished it because it is all
Waffle, and no beef I don't understand how someone can type and talk so long without saying
Anything I actually want to share with you my favorite part of that blog post
Perhaps the most important reason why the material could not be molten aluminium is that the material that actually became white-hot?
Regardless of what kind of material was glowing nobody has explained?
What could have heated it to over 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit Fahrenheit to get it to go with that front now?
This is hilarious because he has an image and it's got these kind of color things coming over and it shows
Oh, it's white it. Must be over this many degrees Fahrenheit, but the hilarious thing is directly above it
He's got an image with it glowing orange. I
What
Now to the cesspool which is the comment section?
I thought of them have been left by what we call me my friends aren't references now
Why do we call you that because we know deep down?
hands and heart
You really don't believe 9/11 was an inside job at all this has become kind of an internet sport for you something to do when?
You're bored because if you really truly truly believed nor eleven was an inside job
You would be there in Manhattan that day, and you would be protesting
I know I would if I believed even for a second that it was an inside job me as a British man would
Travel over to the states and be there protesting anyway back to the comments
some of the comments quite rightly point out some of the mistakes
I've made you know I'm not perfect and people pointed out Matt Serra's me getting someone's name wrong and
Technical errors will be making these videos
There's also people who are generally asking questions and getting responses from people that's fine tastic
There's also people who are backing up actual science against some of these truth. Isn't saying well
That's not true because of this that's not true because of this but
The vast majority of comments on my videos left in the last two months have been from truthers
And they've been negative and they've been so
frustrating and I want to talk about
some of the things they've just been
Really knocking me off some of the types of comments have been knocking me off over the past two months
Number one the outright lie yep apparently this footage mean out there screaming intruders
Is there but I would like to see it because I don't remember ever getting that in fact the only logical
Explanation for this is that I have an identical twin hmm, then apparently I had my ass handed to me by these truthers
I just got to trust me here, but no truther have you done the road whatsoever then I delete comments
I've only deleted two types of comments on my videos in the entire to debate years
I've been on YouTube there are comments with people's personal information and comments where people are trying to sell stuff number two the
Insult and the anti-semitic comments now insults like you were more on your linear double bubble blah
And it's like water off a duck's back to me
But I was really shocked about the anti-semitic comments particularly because I'm not Jewish
The comments at one point got so vile and so hateful that I actually jumped in and said why would me being Jewish?
Affect anything that I've said here and also FYI
I'm not Jewish
But nothing short of me getting my cock out in a bacon sandwich in front of a picture of me getting my First Holy Communion
Is going to convince these people apparently number three the extra information I've had so many comments about
90% of the negative comments left of my video are just people just firing more and more information on me
Uh, what about this? What about that? What about this rather than discussing the points that I've made in my videos
And this wouldn't be so bad, but they keep firing the same bollocks at me and also quite a lot of it is
mentioned in later videos or earlier videos people also send me pointless
information like a perfect example of this is this woman on Facebook who sent me a
Link to a TV show before September 11th that had a plane
That was on autopilot bytes and bad guys who wanted to fly the plane
Into the World Trade Center and at last moment they stopped it and the plane goes up
And it doesn't hit it and she's like deucey deucey it's an inside job
And I'm thinking what am I supposed to be getting from this? What the what the TV show was behind it?
You know there must be something wrong with these people's brains number four that your video is rubbish and you are a moron
This guy discovers quite a lot actually it's people who say like oh you haven't proved anything here. Oh you are wrong here
Oh actually watching your videos, I'm more convinced that you know 9/11 was an inside job. You were just completely
Crazy here, okay?
Well explain to me however explain to me where I'm misinforming people where I am lying where I am misinformed myself
I want you to specifically tell me and about a week ago. I
Was I was replied to every email that said this I'll be like I want you to
specifically tell me
Where I'm going wrong and not one of them could do it number five the pure
Research now a lot of you thinking Waco research. Yeah, all of them are doing terrible research now, I mean
extremely
Awfully bad researched comment like a perfect example of this is in one of my videos only show that molnár minion
And I show that it kind of glows red someone wrote this guy is moron if you do the Google search yourself
You'll see that this isn't actually aluminium
They're all steel and that video that sorry that comment got thumbs up to be the top comment
I mean multiple people saw it and thumbs it up putting on of them ran the Google search themselves because they are all aluminium
Another example of this is people saying that well the towers and World Trade Center seven collapse symmetrically I have no idea
What footage you're watching?
To make you think that they clap symmetrically because they bloody didn't and even if they did how does that prove a controlled demolition?
Because I don't know about you the majority of control demolitions are videos
I've seen have not been symmetrical another one is people ask you about my age now a lot of comments
They all don't listen to this boy. He's just a kid. He's just a child which by the way is very flattering
I've gotta say thank you very much true this by a lot of confusion was about my age
Which is funny because all my videos start with to do like one of these it says my age
How many subscribers I have and my name and my name?
So I don't get that because you must have seen it at the beginning of every one of my videos also my news name is
power in
1985 do you think that was just a random number I bet the reason why this is so funny is because
The guys who made this change are a few years older than me
But when they actually started making them in the beginning like beginning in 2000 mid 2000?
They were considerably younger than me, but apparently their youth didn't matter
But now me being kind of young it does what number six. I'm just asking questions
There is nothing wrong with asking questions provided you have the balls to accept the answers when they contradict your crazy
Conspiracy theory now over the last two to five months. I've had over eight thousand comments
I've had loads and loads of PM's and emails and Facebook
Messages and tweets and of all those different ways of contacting me only one person has done it and said I am
No longer a truther after watching your videos. You know I can see how stupid
I was you know it's absolutely ridiculous, and that doesn't surprise me. I knew before I made these videos
I wasn't going to convince many people that you know the truth is our talking bollocks
I need that I get a lot of gyp from people as well
So why would I make these videos my under spend a large portion of time making seven videos?
Well the truth is it's not for the truthers
It's for the memory of the people who died that day and for their family members
I don't exactly know when it happened, but here in the internet specifically YouTube
It's become okay to say whatever the fuck you want about 9/11. Oh, there's a death laser from space that brought them down
Oh, okay. Oh the planes for Holograms. Oh alright that seems legit
Oh, there's thermite in the towers that brought them down of course
It was a controlled demolition when did it become okay to say?
This kind of thing if you run the YouTube search for September 11th the majority of things that come up are
Conspiracy based videos people these videos are deliberately ignorant the art would be that they call themselves truthers
But they don't care about the truth, or what really happened that day
They ignored the mountain of evidence that contradicts Emin except twisted distorted and fraudulent information that backs up their intellectually bankrupt
Theories in the comments section they keep firing, non
sequiturs that people who disagree with them like a sniper using bullshit foul munition in closing these people are
Was that the internet has to offer YouTube user arcade Owens for explains exactly how I feel and exactly why I made these videos
He says we will never forget and will never allow your history to be distorted or rewritten
so these videos are very much a drop in the ocean, but hopefully to counterbalance it the other way and my
Request to the people out there who also think that 9/11 truthers are having them crazy is
Just comment on things comment if you see video where someone's saying absolute bollocks that you know is incorrect in
2013 comments say no
This is wrong because of this if you see someone saying oh the people were actually
Patsies need you know they deserve to die or whatever then no comment on it
Let them know that this is not okay, and they are wrong
