You might think there was a simple answer
to this. After all, we know how to say what
most things are for: like this or that.
People flock to museums like never before
so they must have their motives but when it
comes to art people get strangely afraid to
ask too directly what it might all be for
because, well, everyone except you might know
the answer already.
It's perhaps obvious, it's perhaps too complicated.
The result is an awkward silence and a lot of confusion.
But maybe it shouldn't be that hard to say
what art is for. Maybe we can have a go at
ascribing certain rather clear purposes to
art.
Here's five things that art might be able
to do for us.
It's an obvious but striking fact that the
most popular works of art in the world show
pretty things: happy people, flowers in spring,
blue skies.
This is the top selling post card in the world
from the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York.
This enthusiasm for prettiness worries
serious types a lot.
They wonder: 'have people forgotten what life
is really like?'
But that seems a misplaced worry. We need
pretty things close to us not because we're
in danger of forgetting the bad stuff but
because terrible problems weigh so heavily
on us that we're in danger of slipping into
despair and depression.
That's why prettiness matters: it's an emblem
of hope, which is an achievement. Prettiness:
those flowers and blue skies and kids in meadows
is hope bottled and preserved, waiting for
us when we need it.
The world often requires us to put on a cheerful
facade but beneath the surface there's a lot
of sadness and regret that we can't express
from fear of seeming weird or a loser.
One thing art can do is reassure us of the
normality of pain. It can be sad with and for us.
Some of the world's greatest works of art
have been loved for their capacity to make
the pain that's inside all of us more publicly
visible and available.
Like putting on a sad piece of music, sombre
works of art don't have to depress us, rather
they can give us the welcome feeling that
pain is part of the human condition.
Art fights the false optimism of commercial
society. It's there to remind us with dignity
that every good life has extraordinary amounts
of confusion, suffering, loneliness and distress
within it. And that therefore, we should never
aggravate sadness by feeling we must be freakish
simply for experiencing it quite a lot.
All of us are a little unbalanced in some
way. We're too intellectual or too emotional,
too masculine or too feminine, too calm or
too excitable.
The art we love is frequently something we're
drawn to because it compensates us for what
we lack. It counterbalances us.
When we're moved by a work of art, it may
be because it contains concentrated doses
of qualities we need more of in our lives.
Perhaps it's full of the serenity we admire
but don't have enough of, perhaps it's got
the tenderness we long for but that our jobs
and relationships are currently lacking. Or
perhaps it's suffused with the pain and drama
we've had to stifle but want to get in touch
with.
Sometimes a whole society falls in love with
a certain style in art because it's trying
to rebalance itself: like France in the late
18th century that wanted David as a corrective
to its decadence or Britain in the 19th century
that looked to the pre-Raphaelites to counter
the effects of brutal industrialisation.
The art a country or a person calls 'beautiful'
gives you vital clues as to what's missing in them.
It's in the power of art to help us feel more
rounded, more balanced and more sane.
The media is constantly giving us hints about
what's glamorous and important. Art also tells
us about what's glamorous and important but,
fortunately, given that you weren't invited
again to the Oscars this year, it usually
picks on some very different things.
Albrecht Durer makes grass look glamorous,
John Constable draws our attention to the
skies, van Gogh reminds us that oranges are
worth paying attention to, Marcel Duchamp
challenges us again to look at the seemingly
mundane.
These artists aren't falsely glamorising things
that are better ignored, they're justly teasing
out a value that's been neglected by a world
with a deeply distorted and unfair sense of
what truly matters.
Art returns glamour to it's rightful place,
highlighting what's genuinely worth appreciating.
Nothing seems further from good art than propaganda,
the sort encouraging you to fight or what
government to support.
But one way to think about art is that it
is a sort of propaganda in the sense of a
tool that motivates and energises you for
a cause, only it's propaganda on behalf of
some of the most important and nicest emotions
and attitudes in the world, which it uses
its skills to make newly appealing and accessible.
It might be propaganda about the simple life
or about the need to broaden one's horizons,
or about a more playful, tender approach to
life. It's a force that stands up for the
best sides of human nature and gives them
a platform and an authority in a noisy, distracted world.
For too long art has attracted a little too
much reverence and mystique for its own good.
In its presence we're like someone meeting
a very famous person, we get stiff and lose
our spontaneity. We should relax around it
as we already do with music and learn to use
it for what it's really meant for:
as a constant source of support and encouragement
for our better selves.
It's the most idiotic thing I've ever heard,
the likes of Russell Brand come along and
saying something so damn ignorant is absolutely
spoon-feeding it to them.
