Despite William Shakespeare’s status as
a literary giant, a small but vocal group
of scholars, playwrights, actors, and conspiracy
theorists have long argued that he is not
the true author of his plays.
Even though the vast majority of Shakespeare
scholars have rejected it, this theory has
become increasingly prominent since the 1980s,
and has even inspired an upcoming film called
Anonymous.
Adherents of the alternate author theory point
to Shakespeare’s humble origins, lack of
formal education, and the murkiness of his
historical record as evidence that the Bard
was incapable of the genius that can be found
in his work.
Not only that, but they frequently nominate
candidates—some of them quite famous—as
the true author.
The following are ten of the most notable
possible authors of the works of Shakespeare,
along with explanations of why some think
they might be the greatest writer you’ve
never heard of.
10.
Sir Fulke Greville
A recent Shakespeare candidate, Fulke Greville
was an English noble and politician who also
nurtured a talent for poetry and drama.
He was the close friend and biographer of
Sir Philip Sidney—one of the towering literary
figures of his time—and spent a good portion
of his life in court with Queen Elizabeth,
for whom he served as a judge, a soldier,
and even a spy.
Evidence for Authorship
The argument for Greville’s authorship is
based around an obscure quote from his biography,
which says that he wanted “to be known to
posterity under no other notions than of Shakespeare’s
master.”
This strange statement caused scholars to
begin seriously considering Greville as a
candidate for being the “true author,”
and the more he was researched the more evidence
was uncovered.
Greville was well known for his writing skill,
and his position as a court spy had taken
him all over Europe.
This would have given him the knowledge and
perspective to write Shakespeare’s foreign-set
plays.
His life also has eerie parallels with Shakespeare.
Both men lived in Stratford on Avon—perhaps
even on the same street—and both had many
of the same friends and acquaintances.
The biographical similarities are so striking,
in fact, that many have come to argue that
“Shakespeare” the historical figure was
actually Fulke Greville, who used the name
as a pseudonym in order to write plays while
still maintaining his position as a noble.
9.
Emilia Lanier
Several of the candidates proposed have been
women, and of these the mysterious Emilia
Lanier is one of the most famous.
Born Emelia Bassano, she was married to a
court musician, but spent several years as
the mistress to the first cousin of Queen
Elizabeth.
Although the details of her life are incomplete,
Lanier is remembered today for being one of
the first professional female poets in England.
Evidence for Authorship
Lanier’s lover was a patron of the arts,
so she would have been acquainted with the
theater and possibly William Shakespeare himself.
Originally, she was considered by many to
be the inspiration for several of Shakespeare’s
famous love poems, particularly the more risqué
“Dark Lady” sonnets.
This theory has recently been expanded to
argue that Lanier is responsible for all of
Shakespeare’s work, and that she used Shakespeare
as a front to make it appear as though her
plays were written by a man.
Evidence includes specific and unusual clusters
of words that seem to only appear in Lanier’s
work and plays like A Midsummer Night’s
Dream, and certain plot points that exist
in both Shakespeare plays and in Lanier’s
book of poetry, Salve Deux Rex Judaeorum.
In several cases, Lanier’s biography also
lines up with content in Shakespeare’s plays,
and different versions of her name are used
as character names throughout the Shakespeare
canon, which some claim she included as hints
that she was the true author.
8.
The Group Theory
Since the 1800s, a popular Shakespeare authorship
theory has been that the plays were not the
work of one writer but rather a syndicate
of different playwrights with a concerted
agenda.
According to the theory, this group merely
used the figure of William Shakespeare as
a front for the release of its collective
writings.
(Shakespeare and his Friends at the Mermaid
Tavern by John Faed.)
Evidence for Authorship
Analysis of Shakespeare’s work has often
revealed a vast breadth of style and technique,
which some argue is far too complex for the
plays to only be the work of one man.
A number of different group candidates have
been proposed, including Mary Sidney, Francis
Bacon, and even Sir Walter Raleigh, all of
whom have been put forth as possible leaders
of the Shakespeare syndicate.
One of the earliest group theory studies proposed
that Bacon and Raleigh used Shakespeare’s
work as a way to advance a particular political
system in the popular culture.
Proponents of the idea point out that in the
Elizabethan era it was not unusual for plays
and other forms of fiction to be co-written
by multiple authors.
For them, the amount of knowledge that the
writer of Shakespeare’s plays held on everything
from religion and science to court history
and law is simply too sprawling to have come
from the mind of one person.
7.
Roger Manners, 5th Earl of Rutland
A noble who supposedly studied under Francis
Bacon, Roger Manners was the 5th Earl of Rutland,
a county in the English midlands.
Manners was a patron of the arts who was renowned
for his keen intellect.
He attended both Oxford and Cambridge, travelled
widely throughout Europe, and corresponded
with many of the scholars and thinkers of
the day.
Evidence for Authorship
Like many of the other candidates, Manners
possessed the education, skill, and perspective
to have written plays and poems of a very
high quality.
Even more interesting, the Earl, his wife
Elizabeth Sidney, and a small group of friends
were known to publish writings under various
assumed and supposedly “common” names
for their own amusement.
Manners in particular was known to have been
a prolific writer, but he only published under
pseudonyms.
This, along with the fact that Shakespeare’s
writing ceased as soon as Manners and his
wife died, have led many to argue that the
two acted in concert to produce the plays
and then published them anonymously.
6.
William Stanley, 6th Earl of Derby
An English nobleman with a penchant for playwriting,
William Stanley served as the 6th Earl of
Derby from 1594 until his death in 1642.
He is best known for the travels he undertook
as a young man, which saw him spend time in
France, Italy, Russia, Greenland, and Egypt.
Evidence for Authorship
The Early of Derby was first proposed as a
Shakespeare authorship candidate in 1891,
when an archivist uncovered letters from a
Jesuit spy that described Stanley as being
“busy penning plays for the common players.”
According to most “Derbyite” theory, passages
in plays like “Love’s Labour’s Lost”
are too steeped in French and European history
not to have been written by someone who was
intimately familiar with the goings on of
the court.
The well-travelled Stanley can be placed in
France and Italy around the time when these
pivotal events took place, and his position
as a noble would’ve meant he was privy to
key events that may have inspired scenes in
the plays of Shakespeare.
Meanwhile, characters in other Shakespeare
plays have been connected to certain real
life acquaintances of William Stanley, among
them the occultist John Dee, who many say
is the inspiration for the character of Prospero
in The Tempest.
According to proponents of the Earl of Derby’s
authorship, the real William Shakespeare was
merely a front man through whom the plays
were released.
Stanley was the true author, but was unable
to attach his name to his work out of fear
that being a published, commercial writer
would sully his reputation as a nobleman.
5.
Mary Sidney Herbert, Countess of Pembroke
In the late 1500s and early 1600s, perhaps
only Queen Elizabeth was a more educated and
influential woman than Mary Sidney Herbert.
Born into a powerful family, Herbert was a
true renaissance woman.
She was fluent in several languages and was
an expert in medicine, law—even falconry.
Most of all, she was skilled at writing and
translating plays and poetry.
She is best known today for founding the Wilton
Circle, an important literary group, and for
being one of the first women in England to
publish a play.
Evidence for Authorship
Mary Sidney Herbert is certainly the most
popular female candidate.
She had the background, intelligence, and
desire to create writing on the level of Shakespeare,
and her social position as a woman gave her
a perfect motive: at the time, no lady would
have been allowed to have her plays performed
in the theater.
Scholars agree that Shakespeare was aware
of her work, and may have even used her The
Tragedie of Antonie as a template for his
play Antony and Cleopatra.
With this in mind, many have argued that the
notion that she wrote Shakespeare’s plays
herself is not that far-fetched.
Another crucial piece of evidence concerns
Shakespeare’s famous love sonnets, some
of which tell of an affair with a younger
man who was himself seeing a dark-eyed, dark-haired
woman.
A similar story is documented in Mary Sidney’s
personal life, which has led some to argue
the sonnets are autobiographical.
Scholars have long noted feminine touches
and voice in the work of Shakespeare.
Those who believe in Mary Sidney’s candidacy
would say it was because the author was in
fact a woman.
4.
Sir Henry Neville
Of the sixty-plus candidates for the “true
author,” Sir Henry Neville is one of the
newest and most popular additions.
The nobleman and politician was educated at
Oxford, traveled throughout Europe, and even
served for some time as the English ambassador
to France.
While he was known to be a skilled writer
and scholar, most of his professional life
was spent as a member of parliament.
He was imprisoned in the Tower of London in
1601 for playing a minor role in a failed
uprising against Queen Elizabeth, but was
released when James I ascended to the throne.
Evidence for Authorship
Most if not all of the proposed alternate
authors have biographies that dovetail with
characters, settings, and story lines in Shakespeare
plays.
But it has been argued that Neville’s life
lines up almost perfectly.
Neville can be placed in the setting of many
Shakespeare plays around the time they were
written, and he had the knowledge of the languages
and the law that would have been needed to
write in the kind of detail that is exhibited
in the plays.
Examinations of his writing style have found
remarkable similarities with Shakespeare,
and a document bearing Neville’s seal has
been found on which the signature “William
Shakespeare” is written several times, as
though someone were practicing it.
While scholars have often been puzzled why
Shakespeare’s work suddenly became darker
and more tragic in the early 1600s, proponents
of Neville’s authorship argue it was because
of Neville’s depression at having been imprisoned
and stripped of his wealth and political standing.
3.
Christopher Marlowe
In the Elizabethan era, playwright Christopher
Marlowe was second only to William Shakespeare
in fame—but many claim that he actually
composed plays for the both of them.
He is perhaps best known for his controversial
play Doctor Faustus, and for his mysterious
death at the age of 29.
Little is known about Marlowe, and there are
accounts that he was, among other things,
a professional spy and counterfeiter.
Evidence for Authorship
According to Marlovians, the group who assert
Marlowe to be the true author, the young poet
did not actually die at the age of 29.
Rather, he faked his own death and went on
writing plays that were passed off as the
work of William Shakespeare.
Marlowe has long been agreed to be a major
influence on the work of Shakespeare, and
some believe that the similarities between
their writing styles are too precise to ignore.
In fact, computer analysis of Shakespeare
and Marlowe’s writing has failed to find
significant differences between the two.
Not only would Marlowe have had the proper
education and background to write Shakespeare’s
plays, but Shakespeare’s first published
work came no less than thirteen days after
Marlowe’s supposed death.
Elements of Marlowe’s life show up in countless
places in Shakespeare’s plays, and many
claim that hidden ciphers and anagrams within
the works give hints that Marlowe is the true
author.
While it rests on some dubious assertions,
the Marlovian theory is one of the oldest
Shakespeare authorship arguments.
It has even inspired a literary prize, which
promises a hefty bounty to anyone who can
provide hard evidence that Marlowe was Shakespeare.
2.
Sir Francis Bacon
Sir Francis Bacon was one of the first “true
authors” proposed by the “Anti-Stratfordians”—the
blanket term used to refer to those who doubt
Shakespeare’s authorship—in the 19th century.
Bacon was a British writer, lawyer, politician,
and philosopher who was a key figure in the
scientific revolution.
He was one of the major thinkers on empiricism,
the branch of philosophy that asserts all
knowledge is gained through the senses.
His dedication to experimentation and procedural
investigation led many to call him the father
of the scientific method.
Evidence for Authorship
Those who believe Bacon wrote Shakespeare
have pointed to everything from his personal
letters to similarity in writing style, textual
analysis, autobiographical similarities, and
even supposed cryptographic passages hidden
within the plays.
Bacon was an expert on the law, and many have
pointed to the many legal references in Shakespeare’s
plays—references a man of Shakespeare’s
education shouldn’t have known—as proof
that Bacon was the true author.
Most of all, Bacon was simply the preeminent
thinker and writer of his day.
As one scholar has suggested, “had the plays
come down to us anonymously…we could have
found no one of that day but Francis Bacon
to whom to assign the crown.”
1.
Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford
The 17th Earl of Oxford, Edward de Vere was
a nobleman, poet, and champion jouster who
spent his early life as a ward of Queen Elizabeth.
He received an excellent education before
serving in the House of Lords and then traveling
to France and Italy.
He spent most of his life as a regular fixture
in the Queen’s court, but he also distinguished
himself as a patron of the theater and as
a lyrical poet.
Evidence For Authorship
In recent years, Edward de Vere has become
the most popular candidate for being the true
author of the works of Shakespeare.
Not only was the Earl of Oxford often praised
for his exquisite poetry and plays, but also
he was deeply entrenched in the theatre scene
in London.
He was known for secrecy with regard to his
writing—no plays written under his name
have survived—which many say makes him the
perfect candidate for being a “suppressed
author.”
“Oxfordians” point to de Vere’s travels
and his position as a courtier as proof that
he would have had all the reference he needed
to write about nobility and royalty as they
are depicted in the plays of Shakespeare.
They have also studied his biography closely
and found many parallels between his life
in court and characters and events in Shakespeare.
Since so much of the content of the plays
is satirical, de Vere also had a perfect motive
for wanting to remain anonymous.
Some scholars have claimed that the language
employed by de Vere in personal writings is
remarkably similar to that of Shakespeare,
and they point to a Latin grammar document
referenced in Shakespeare that contains the
sentence “Edwardus is my proper name”
as being a possible hint from de Vere.
Meanwhile, it was de Vere’s family that
financed the publication of the first folio
of Shakespeare’s writing in 1623.
Perhaps most interesting of all, although
Shakespeare lived twelve years past de Vere’s
death, he remained silent on certain contemporary
topics—most notably scientific breakthroughs
and politics—in his later work.
For Oxfordians, this suggests those plays
had already been written by de Vere prior
to
his death.
