
English: 
Welcome to part one of a four-part
series on the work and the contribution
made by Karl Marx. We do this now because
it's the 200th anniversary of Karl
Marx's birth, but of course the real
reason we do it, is because we think that
that work, that criticism of the
capitalist economic system, remains a

Dutch: 
Welkom bij deel 1 van een vierdelige
serie over het werk en de bijdrage
van Karl Marx. We doen dit nu omdat
het de 200ste verjaardag van Karl
Marx is, maar  de echte reden waarom we het doen, is natuurlijk omdat we  denken dat
dat werk, die kritiek op het
kapitalistisch economisch systeem, een

Portuguese: 
Bem-vindo à parte um de quatro partes
série sobre o trabalho e a contribuição
feita por Karl Marx. Fazemos isso agora porque
é o 200º aniversário de nascimento de
Karl Marx, mas é claro que o verdadeiro
razão pela qual fazemos isso, é porque pensamos que
esse trabalho, essa crítica do
sistema econômico capitalista, continua sendo uma

Modern Greek (1453-): 
Καλωσήρθατε στο πρώτο μέρος από μια σειρά 4 μερών για την εργασία και τη συνεισφορά
του Καρλ Μαρξ.Το κάνουμε τώρα αυτό διότι είναι η 200η επέτειος από τη γέννηση του
Μαρξ,όμως ασφαλώς ο αληθινός λόγος που το κάνουμε είναι επειδή πίστευουμε
ότι αυτή η εργασία,η κριτική του καπιταλιστικού οικονομικού συτήματος,παραμένει

English: 
source of important insights, that can be
useful for all of those who want to make
a better world out of the one we're now
living in and through. Before I start, I
have to acknowledge what I'm sure you
all know, that words like Marx and
Marxism, socialism, communism, and all that,
have been scare words for an awful lot
of us for many years. The cold war that
erupted after 1945, and pretty much the
whole time since, has been a time when
words like that were associated with
scary other countries, scary dangers to
various aspects of the way we live, and
so they inspired a mixture of fear and
anxiety, and the way that worked out for
an awful lot of Americans, and indeed
people elsewhere too, was a decision not

Modern Greek (1453-): 
μια πηγή ενδιαφέροντων σκέψεων,που μπορεί να είναι χρήσιμες για όλους όσους θέλουν να κανουν
το κόσμο καλύτερο από αυτόν που ζούμε.Πριν αρχίσω θα πρέπει
να αναγνωρίσω αυτό που όλοι γνωρίζετε,ότι λέξεις όπως Μαρξ
Μαρξισμός,σοσιαλισμός,κομμουνισμός,κα;ι όλα αυτά ήταν τρομακτικές λέξεις για πολλούς
μας και για πολλά χρόνια.Ο ψυχρός πόλερμος που ξέσπασε μετά το 1945, και τον περισσότερο
καιρό από τότε,ήταν ένας καιρός όπου λέξεις τέτοιες ήταν συνδεδεμένες με
τρομακτικές άλλες χώρες,κινδύνους σε πολλούς τομείς του τρόπου που ζούμε και
ενέπνευσαν ένα μίγμα φόβου και άγχους,και αυτό έγινε για
πολλούς Αμερικάνους,αλλά και άλλων χωρών,και αυτό ήταν μια "απόφαση"

Portuguese: 
fonte de informações importante, que pode ser
útil para todos aqueles que querem fazer
um mundo melhor do que estamos agora
vivendo. Antes de começar, eu
devo reconhecer,  o que tenho certeza que você
todos sabem, que palavras como Marx e
de nós por muito tempo. A guerra fria que
irrompeu após 1945, e  que
desde então, tem sido um tempo em que
palavras assim foram associadas a
países e perigos assustadores a 
vários aspectos da nossa maneira de viver e
então eles inspiraram uma mistura de medo e ansiedade e a maneira com que
uma enorme quantidade de americanos, e pessoas em outros lugares também, foi a decisão não

Dutch: 
bron van belangrijke inzichten blijft, die nuttig kan zijn voor iedereen die
een betere wereld wil scheppen, dan waar we nu in leven. Voordat ik begin,
moet ik erkennen wat je zeker zal
weten, dat woorden als Marx en
marxisme, socialisme, communisme en zo,  vele jaren voor ons schrikwoorden zijn geweest.
Vrijwel sinds de koude oorlog, die na 1945 uitbarstte,
zijn dit soort woorden geassocieerd met
enge andere landen, enge gevaren voor
verschillende aspecten van de manier waarop we leven,
en dus boezemden ze een mengeling van angst en verontrusting in, en de manier waarop dat uitwerkte op
heel veel Amerikanen, en inderdaad
mensen ook elders, was een beslissing

English: 
to pay any attention to the work of Karl
Marx, not to read it, not to think about
it,
and unfortunately that meant we didn't
learn from it. So let me begin by
explaining briefly what it is we can
learn. Karl Marx was a critic of
capitalism. He didn't like the system, and
he basically thought that the human race
could and should do better, and so he
spent his adult life explaining and
analyzing for all the rest of us, what it
was that he found
inadequate about capitalism, where
exactly he thought we could and should
do better, and to present that as clearly
and persuasively as, I think, he knew how.
Why should we pay attention to the
critic? And well the answer is simple:
critics have their perspective. It's

Modern Greek (1453-): 
να μην προσεχτεί η εργασία του Καρλ Μαρξ,να αποφεύγεται να μην αναγιγνώσκεται ή να σκεφτόμαστε για αυτά
και δυσυχώς αυτό σήμαινε ότι δεν
μάθαμε από αυτά;.Οπότε επιτρέψτε μου να ξεκινήσω εξηγώντας σύντομα τι είναι αυτό το οποίο μπορούμε
να μάθουμε.Ο Καρλ Μαρξ ήταν κριτικός του Καπιταλισμού.Δε του άρεσε το σύστημα,και
βασικά πίστευε ότι το ανθρώπινο είδος μπορεί και θα έπρεπε να τα πάει καλύτερα,κι έτσι
ξόδεψε την ενήλικη ζωή του εξηγώντας και αναλύοντας,για όλους μας,τι ήταν αυτό
που έβρισκε ανεπαρκές στον καπιταλισμό,και πίστευε ότι
μπορούμε αλλά και θα έπρεπε να πάμε καλύτερα,και να το παρουσιάσουμε αυτό ξεκάθαρα
και πειστικά ως,πιστευω ότι ήξερε πως.Για ποιό λόγο θα έπρεπε να προσέξουμε τον
κριτικό;.Η απάντηση είναι απλή.Οι κριτικοί έχουν τη δκή τους αντίληψη που είναι

Dutch: 
om geen aandacht te besteden aan het werk van Karl
Marx,  om het niet te lezen, om er niet over na te denken,
en helaas betekende dat dat we er geen
kennis van namen. Dus laat ik beginnen
kort uit te leggen wat we ervan kunnen
leren. Karl Marx was een criticus van het
kapitalisme. Hij hield niet van het systeem, en
hij dacht eigenlijk dat de mensheid
beter zou kunnen en moeten doen, en daarom
bracht hij zijn volwassen leven door met uitleggen en
analyseren voor de rest van ons, wat het
was dat hij ontoereikend vond aan het kapitalisme, waar
hij precies dacht dat we het beter konden en zouden moeten doen, en dat zo duidelijk en overtuigend
mogelijk te  presenteren.
Waarom moeten we aandacht schenken aan de
criticus? En het antwoord is simpel:
critici hebben hun perspectief. Het is

Portuguese: 
prestar atenção ao trabalho de Karl
Marx, não ler, não pensar nisso
e infelizmente isso significou que não
se aprendeu com isso. Então deixe-me começar por explicar brevemente o que é que podemos
aprender. Karl Marx era um crítico de
capitalismo. Ele não gostava do sistema e
ele basicamente pensou que a humanidade poderia e deveria fazer melhor, e então ele
passou sua vida adulta explicando e
analisando para todos nós, o que
ele encontrou de inadequado sobre o capitalismo, onde
exatamente ele pensou que poderíamos e deveríamos fazer melhor e apresentar isso tão clara
e persuasivamente, eu acredito que ele sabia como fazer. Por que devemos prestar atenção aos
críticos? Bem, a resposta é simples:
os críticos têm sua perspectiva. Ela é

Modern Greek (1453-): 
διαφορετική από αυτή των ανθρώπων που τους αρέσει κάτι,και ο τροπος του
έξυπνου ανθρώπου σε δύσκολα θέματα είναι να ερευνά
τι είναι αυτό που πιστεύουν οι άνθρωποι στους οποίους αρέσει,αλλά και επίσης και τι πιστεύουν
άνθρωποι που δεν τους αρέσει και τότε βγάζουμε τα δικά μας συμπεράσματα.Ειναι
λίγο σαν να θες να καταλάβεις την οικογένεια που ζει δίπλα,τη μητέρα ,τον πατέρα,
και τα δύο παιδιά που έχουν.Αν και ξέρουμε το ένα παιδί που νομίζει ότι
έχει τη καλύτερη οικογένεια που υπήρξε,και το άλλο νομίζει ότι είναι συνονθύλευμα
ψυχολογικών δυσλειτουργιών,αν πρόκειται να εξετάσουμε την οικογένεια,δεν θα
επιλέγαμε να μιλήσουμε με το ένα παιδί,ή το άλλο,αυτό που θα κάναμε αν
είμασταν ειλικρινείς,θα ήταν να μιλήσουμε και με τα δύο,να ακούσουμε τι έχουν να πουν,να
κάνουμε ερωτήσεις και τότε να εξάγουμε τα δικά μας συμπεράσματα για αυτή την οικογένεια,κάνοντας
την καλύτερη αξιολόγηση.Οπότε παρομοίως και με τον καπιταλισμό.Σπουδάζουμε σε αυτή

English: 
different from the perspective of people
who like something, and the way an
intelligent person goes about dealing
with a difficult topic, is to interrogate
and to investigate what the people
believe who like it, but also what the
people believe who don't like it, and
then we draw our own conclusions. It's a
little bit like wanting to understand
the family that lives up the road, mama,
Papa, and the two kids that they have.
Even though we know one kid thinks it's
the greatest family there ever was, and
the other one thinks it's a basket case
of psychological dysfunction, if we're
gonna study the family, we wouldn't
choose to talk to one child, neither the
one or the other, what we would do if we
were honest, would be to talk to both
children, hear what they have to say, ask
questions, and then draw our own
conclusions about that family, making the
best judgment we can. Well, likewise, so it
is with capitalism. We study in this

Portuguese: 
diferente da perspectiva das pessoas
que gostam de algo, e a maneira como
pessoas inteligentes lidam
com um tópico difícil, é interrogar
e investigar o que as pessoas que  gostam, mas também no que
as pessoas que não gostam para
então tirar suas próprias conclusões. É um
um pouco como querer entender
a família que vive logo ali, mamãe,
Papai e os dois filhos .
Mesmo sabendo que um garoto acha que é
a melhor família que já existiu, e
o outro acha que é uma cesta
de disfunção psicológica, se formos estudar a família, nós não devemos
optar por conversar com apenas um filho, nem o um ou outro, o que faríamos para
sermos honestos, seria conversar com ambas crianças, ouvir o que elas têm a dizer, perguntar
e em seguida, tirar conclusões sobre essa família, fazendo o
melhor julgamento que pudermos. Bem, da mesma forma,  isso ocorre com o capitalismo. Nós estudamos neste

Dutch: 
anders dan het perspectief van mensen
die iets leuk vinden, en de manier waarop een
intelligent persoon met een moeilijk onderwerp omgaat, is te ondervragen
en te onderzoeken wat de mensen
geloven die het aanstaat, maar ook wat de
mensen geloven die het maar niks vinden, en dan trekken we onze eigen conclusies. Het is een
beetje zoals het willen begrijpen
van het gezin dat langs de weg woont: mamma,
pappa, en de twee kinderen die ze hebben. Ook al weten we dat één kind denkt dat het
de beste familie ooit is, en
de ander denkt dat het een container is
van psychologische stoornissen, stel dat
we de familie gaan bestuderen, dan zouden we er niet
voor kiezen om met één kind te praten, noch de één of de ander. Als we eerlijk
waren, zouden we met beide kinderen praten, om te horen wat ze te zeggen hebben, we zouden
vragen stellen, en dan onze eigen 
conclusies over dat gezin trekken, om zo
tot het beste oordeel te komen. Wel, zo 
is het ook met het kapitalisme. Dat bestuderen we in het

English: 
country of the United States, but in
other countries too, we have plenty of
folks who help us study what's good
about it, what they like about it, what's
positive. But a well-rounded
understanding, an honest engagement with
the system we live in, would require us
to look at critics as well. And for the
last 200 years, the leading critic has
been Karl Marx, more than any other
person.
He's as important on the side of
criticizing capitalism, as folks like
Adam Smith, and Ricardo, and John Millet
Maynard Keynes, are on the side of those
who think capitalism really is the best
thing since sliced bread. So let's jump
right in.
What motivated Karl Marx as a young man
growing up in the middle of the 19th

Portuguese: 
nos Estados Unidos, mas em
outros países também, temos muitas
pessoas que nos ajudam a estudar o que é bom
sobre ele, o que eles gostam, o que é
positivo. Mas um bom entendimento, um compromisso honesto com
o sistema em que vivemos, nos exige
olhar para os críticos também. E nos
últimos 200 anos, o principal crítico foi
Karl Marx, mais do que qualquer outra
pessoa. Ele é tão importante como
crítico do capitalismo, quanto Adam Smith, Ricardo e John Millet
Maynard Keynes no lado daqueles
que pensam que o capitalismo é realmente a melhor
coisa desde pão de forma. Então vamos direto ao ponto.
O que motivou Karl Marx quando  era jovem em meados do século 19?

Dutch: 
land van de Verenigde Staten, maar in
ook andere landen hebben we genoeg
mensen die ons helpen te bestuderen wat er goed aan is, wat ze er leuk aan vinden, wat er
positief aan is. Maar een goed afgerond
begrip, een eerlijke omgang met
het systeem waarin we leven, zou van ons verlangen om ook naar kritiek te kijken. En voor de
afgelopen 200 jaar is Karl Marx de leidende criticus geweest, meer dan enig ander
persoon.
Hij is net zo belangrijk aan de kant van
kritiek op het kapitalisme, als mensen als
Adam Smith,  Ricardo,  John Millet en
Maynard Keynes,  ​​aan de kant staan van degenen die denken dat het kapitalisme echt het beste
ding sinds gesneden brood is. Dus laten we er meteen induiken.
Wat motiveerde Karl Marx als jonge man,
opgroeiend in het midden van de 19e

Modern Greek (1453-): 
τη χώρα των Ηνωμένων Πολιτειών,αλλά και σε άλλες χώρες,έχουμε ένα σωρό
ανθρώπων που μας βοηθούν να σπουδάσουμε το τι είναι καλό,τι είναι
θετικό.Όμως μια συνολική κατανόηση,μια ειλικρινή ανάγνωση
του συστήματος στο οποίο ζούμε,θα απαιτούσε από μας να προσέξουμε επίσης τους κριτικούς του.Και για τα
τελευταία 200 χρόνια,ο βασικός κριτικός ήταν ο Καρλ Μαρξ,πιο πολύ απο τον καθένα.
Είναι όσο σημαντικός-από τη πλευρά της
κριτικής του καπιταλισμού-όπως διανοητές όπως ο Adam Smith,o Ricrdo,o John Millet
o Meynard Keynes-είναι από τη πλευρά αυτών που πιστεύουν ότι ο καπιταλισμός είναι ότι καλύτερο
μπορεί να υπάρξει.Οπότε ας ξεκινήσουμε.
Τι  κινητοποίησε τον Καρλ Μαρξ ως νεαρό που μεγάλωνε στα μέσα του 19ου

English: 
century as he did?  Well the answer is: the
goals of the French and American
revolutions.  He said so many times. He
loved the slogan of the French
Revolution: liberty, equality, fraternity,
brotherhood. He loved the idea of the
American Revolution, democracy, and he
wanted those things to be realized in
modern society, in the middle of the 19th
century Europe, where he grew up and
lived his life. But he lived at a time
when he was becoming doubtful of a basic
idea, that had grown up since the French
and American Revolution, and this idea
was, that we would get rid of the old
systems of slavery and feudalism, masters
and slaves, and lords and serfs, was now
behind us, we would have a new world, a
capitalist world, where the two players
were employers and employees, no longer

Modern Greek (1453-): 
αιώνα όπως αυτός;Η απάντηση είναι,οι στόχοι της Γαλλικής και Αμερικάνικης
επανάστασης.Το είπε πολλές φορές....Του άρεσε η ρήση της Γαλλικής
επανάστασης,ελευθερία,ισότητα,αδερφοσύνη.Αγαπούσε την ιδέα της
Αμερικανικής Επανάστασης,την δημοκρατία,και ήθελε αυτά τα πράγματα να γίνουν συνείδηση στην
μοντέρνα κοινωνία,στα μέσα του 19ου αιώνα,στην Ευρώπη όπου και μεγάλωσε και
έζησε.Όμως έζησε σε ένα καιρό όπου αμφισβητούσε μια βασική
ιδέα,που αναπτυσόταν από την Γαλλική και Αμερικανική επανάσταση,και αυτή η ιδέα ήταν
ότι θα μπορούσαμε να ξεφορτωθούμε τα παλιά συστήματα της δουλείας και φεουδαρχίας,αφεντικά και
σκλάβοι,λόρδοι και δουλοπάροικοι,αυτά τα είχαμε αφήσει πίσω μας,θα είχαμε έναν νέο κόσμο,
καπιταλιστικό κόσμο,όπου οι δύο παίκτες είναι εργαζόμενοι και εργοδότες,όχι πια

Portuguese: 
Bem, a resposta é: o
objetivos das Revoluções francesa e americana
Ele disse muitas vezes. Ele
amava o lema da Revolução francesa
liberdade, igualdade, fraternidade. Ele amava a ideia da
Revolução Americana, democracia, e ele
queria que essas coisas fossem reealizadas na
sociedade moderna, na Europa de meados do século XIX em que cresceu e
viveu sua vida. Mas ele viveu numa época 
em que tornando duvidoso que a
ideia básica, que cresceu desde as Revoluções francesa e americana de que
se livrar dos velhos
sistemas de escravidão e feudalismo, amos
e escravos, e senhores e servos, traria um novo mundo, um
mundo capitalista, onde os dois protagonistas eram empregadores e empregados, não mais

Dutch: 
eeuw? Het antwoord is: de
oogmerken van de Franse en Amerikaanse
revoluties. Hij zei het zo vaak. Hij
hield van de slogan van de Franse
revolutie: vrijheid, gelijkheid, broederschap. Hij hield van het idee van de
Amerikaanse revolutie -democratie-, en hij
wilde dat die dingen werden gerealiseerd in de
moderne samenleving van het midden van 19e eeuws Europa, waarin hij leefde  en
opgroeide. Maar hij leefde in een tijd
dat hij begon te twijfelen aan een grond
idee, dat ontstaan was sinds de Franse
en Amerikaanse revolutie, en dit idee
was, dat we ons zouden verlossen van de oude systemen. De slavernij en het feodalisme -meesters
en slaven, en heren en lijfeigenen- waren nu achter ons, en  we zouden een nieuwe wereld hebben, een
kapitalistische wereld, waar de twee spelers -werkgevers en werknemers- waren, en niet langer

Dutch: 
onvrije slaven, niet langer onvrije lijfeigenen. En met het vervangen van feodalisme en slavernij door
kapitalisme, zou een wereld van
vrijheid, gelijkheid, broederschap en
democratie ingeluid worden. Nou, Karl Marx, die vijftig tot  honderd jaar later komt, zegt: wel, we hebben het
het kapitalisme, okay, maar de belofte
dat kapitalisme zou zorgen voor
vrijheid, gelijkheid, broederschap en
democratie, wel, dat is niet gebeurd. Karl
Marx keek rond in het Europa van zijn eigen
tijd, in het midden van de eeuw, en
wat hij zag is zo ongeveer wat 
opgeschreven was, in bijvoorbeeld  de romans
van Charles Dickens. Hij zag een enorme
kloof tussen een relatief klein deel van

Modern Greek (1453-): 
μη-ελεύθεροι σκλάβοι,μη-ελεύθεροι δουλοπάροικοι.Και έχοντας τον καπιταλισμό να αντικαθιστά φεουδαρχία
και δουλοκτησία,θα μεταβαίναμε σε έναν κόσμο ελευθερίας,ισότητας και αδελφότητας και
δημοκρατίας.Ο Καρλ Μαρξ ερχόμενος 50 με  100 χρόνια αργότερα,λέει,λοιπόν έχουμε
ασφαλώς τον καπιταλισμό,αλλά η υπόσχεση ότι ο καπιταλισμός θα σήμαινε και θα
έφερνε ελευθερία,ισότητα,αδελφότητα και δημοκρατία δεν συνέβη.Ο Καρλ Μαρξ
κοίταξε την Ευρώπη του καιρού του,στα μέσα του 19ου αιώνα και
αυτό που είδε είναι αυτό το οποίο περιγράφεται στις νουβέλες
του Charles Dickens.Εϊδε ένα τεράστιο χάσμα μεταξύ ενός σχετικά μικρού μέρους του

English: 
unfree slaves, no longer unfree serfs. And
by having capitalism replace feudalism
and slavery, we would usher in a world of
liberty, equality, fraternity and
democracy. Well Karl Marx, coming fifty to
a hundred years later, says, well we got
the capitalism all right, but the promise
that capitalism would mean and would
deliver liberty, equality, fraternity and
democracy, well, it has not happened. Karl
Marx looked around the Europe of his
time, in the middle of the century, and
what he saw is pretty much what was
written down, for example in the novels
of Charles Dickens. He saw an enormous
gap between a relatively small part of

Portuguese: 
escravos sem liberdade, não mais servos sem liberdade. E pelo fato de o capitalismo substituir o feudalismo
e escravidão, inauguraríamos um mundo de liberdade, igualdade, fraternidade e
democracia. Bem, Karl Marx, chegando cinquenta a cem anos depois, diz, bem, nós certamente temos
o capitalismo, mas a promessa
que capitalismo significaria e traria
liberdade, igualdade, fraternidade e
democracia, bem, isso não aconteceu.
Karl Marx olhou ao redor na Europa de seu tempo, meados do século, e
o que ele viu é praticamente o que estava
escrito, por exemplo, nos romances
de Charles Dickens. Ele viu uma enorme
diferença entre uma parte relativamente pequena

Portuguese: 
a população, que estava bem, bem
educada, alfabetizada e confortável,
e por outro lado uma massa de trabalhadores em indústrias e fábricas, que
não tinha nada  dessas coisas, era pobre, sem instrução, que eram analfabetos,
e era quem estava sofrendo; e ele sentiu a traição. Não é uma palavra muito forte.
O capitalismo traiu, na sua opinião, a
promessa que levou tantas pessoas que
ele admirava a apoiar o fim do
feudalismo, e da escravidão, e
eles acolheram o capitalismo, porque prometeu liberdade,
igualdade, fraternidade e democracia. E então estabeleceu para si mesmo uma meta: saber o que aconteceu, foi
a grande questão para ele. Porque
capitalismo não cumpriu essa promessa? Por que

Dutch: 
de bevolking, die welgesteld was, goed opgeleid, geletterd en comfortabel,
en aan de andere kant een massa van arbeiders in
de industrieën en de fabrieken, voor
wie geen van die dingen golden, die arm waren, ongeschoold, analfabeet,
en die aan het lijden waren; en hij voelde het verraad. Dat is niet te sterk uitgedrukt.
Het kapitalisme had volgens hem de
belofte verraden, die zoveel mensen die hij bewonderde
ertoe gebracht hadden, om het einde van het  feodalisme te ondersteunen, en het einde van de
slavernij, en het welkom dat ze allemaal boden aan een kapitalisme, omdat het vrijheid,
gelijkheid, broederschap en democratie beloofde. En dus stelde hij zichzelf een doel. Wat er gebeurde was
een grote vraag voor hem. Waarom loste
het kapitalisme z'n belofte niet in? Waarom had

Modern Greek (1453-): 
πληθυσμού,που ζούσαν καλά,καλά μορφωμένοι,και έχοντας άνετη ζωή
και από την άλλη μια μεγάλη μάζα εργαζόμενων στις βιομηχανίες,που
δεν τα είχαν αυτά,που ήταν φτωχοί,αμόρφωτοι,αναλφάβητοι,
και που υπέφεραν,και ένοιωσε την προδοσία -το λιγότερο που μπορεί να ειπωθεί.
Ο καπιταλισμός είχε προδώσει από την οπτική του,την υπόσχεση που είχε οδηγήσει τόσο πολλούς ανθρώπους που
θαύμαζε,να υποστηρίξουν τον τερματισμό της φεουδαρχίας και δουλοκτησίας
και καλωσόρισαν,υποστήριξαν  έναν καπιταλισμό,επειδή υποσχέθηκε ελευθερία,
ισότητα,αδελφότητα και δημοκρατία.Οπότε έβαλε έναν στόχο.Αυτό που συνέβη ήταν
το μεγάλο ερώτημα για αυτον.Για ποιο λόγο ο καπιταλισμός δεν υλοποίησε την υπόσχεση;Γιατί

English: 
the population, that was well-off, well
educated, literate and comfortable,
and on the other a mass of workers in
the industries and the factories, who
were none of those things, who were poor,
who were uneducated, who were illiterate,
and who were suffering; and he felt the
betrayal. It's not too strong a word.
Capitalism had betrayed in his view, the
promise that had led so many people that
he admired, to support the end of
feudalism, and the end of slavery, and
they welcomed they all offered to a
capitalism, because it promised liberty,
equality, fraternity, and democracy. And so
he set himself a goal: what happened was
the great question for him. Why did
capitalism not bring the promise? Why had

Dutch: 
was dat niet gelukt? En het onderzoek dat hij ondernam, en vervolgens op schrift zette, is wat
we nu hebben als een kritiek op het kapitalisme, omdat wat hij in feite ontdekte en
over schreef, was dat kapitalisme niet alleen  niet het voertuig was om
vrijheid, gelijkheid, broederschap, en democratie in het leven te roepen. Het was in feite een obstakel
voor de realisatie van die verheven doelen, die Marx  nooit ophield te vereren en eveneens tot
zijn doelen te maken. Nou, wat betekent het om een criticus van het kapitalisme te zijn? Het betekent
dat hij in het kapitalisme vond, en dit is
wat we gaan bestuderen in onze
discussies in deel twee, drie en vier
van deze serie, dat hij in het kapitalisme

Modern Greek (1453-): 
απέτυχε να το κάνει αυτό;Και η έρευνα που έκανε,και μετά συνέγραψε,είναι αυτό
που έχουμε τώρα ως μια κριτική του καπιταλισμού διότι αυτό που βασικά ανακάλυψε και
έγραψε για αυτό,ήταν ότι ο καπιταλισμός όχι μόνο δεν ήταν το όχημα που θα έφερνε
ελευθερία,ισότητα,αδελφότητα και δημοκρατία,ήταν στη πραγματικότητα ένα εμπόδιο
συνειδητοποίησης αυτών των μεγάλων ιδανικών,τα οποία ο Μαρξ δε σταμάτησε ποτέ να χαιρετίζει και να τα κάνει
στόχους του επίσης.Τι λοιπόν σημαίνει να είναι κανείς κριτικός του καπιταλισμού;Σημαίνει
ότι βρήκε στον καπιταλισμό-και αυτό θα μελετήσουμε στις
συζητήσεις μας στα μέρη 2 3 και 4 αυτής τς σειράς-βρήκε στον καπιταλισμό

English: 
it failed to do that? And the research he
undertook, which he then wrote up, is what
we have now as a criticism of capitalism,
because what he basically discovered and
wrote about, was that capitalism not only
wasn't the vehicle for bringing to be
into being, liberty, equality, fraternity,
and democracy, it was in fact an obstacle
to realizing those lofty goals, which
Marx never stopped saluting and making
his goals as well. Well what does it mean
to be a critic of capitalism? It means
that he found in capitalism, and this is
what we're going to study in our
discussions in parts two, three, and four
of this series, he found in capitalism

Portuguese: 
falhou em fazer isso? E a pesquisa que ele empreendeu, que ele deixou escrito, é o que
temos agora como crítica ao capitalismo,
porque o que ele basicamente descobriu e
escreveu, era que o capitalismo não apenas não era o veículo para trazer
liberdade, igualdade, fraternidade,
e democracia, era de fato um obstáculo
para realizar esses objetivos, que
Marx nunca deixou de saudar e fazer
seus objetivos também. Bem, o que significa ser um crítico do capitalismo? Significa
que ele encontrou no capitalismo, e isso é
o que vamos estudar em nossa
discussões nas partes dois, três e quatro
desta série, ele encontrou no capitalismo

Portuguese: 
os elementos de um sistema que torna
impossível ter liberdade, igualdade,
fraternidade e democracia. Ele sentiu isso
capitalismo bloqueou, impediu, frustrou
qualquer progresso que a humanidade fez
nessa direção; e isso o levou, é claro,
à conclusão: que, para
para se aproximar da liberdade, igualdade, fraternidade e democracia, tivemos que ir para
um tipo diferente de sistema, que fundamentalmente diferente do capitalismo,
e por razões que ele explicará e
explicaria para nós que era para ele sua
tarefa; e resumir neste primeiro
apresentação introdutória, o que ele
descobriu, é mais ou menos assim: no
escravidão que rejeitamos, os seres humanos eram

English: 
the elements of a system that made it
impossible to have liberty, equality,
fraternity, and democracy. He felt that
capitalism blocked, prevented, thwarted
whatever progress in those directions
human
beings had achieved; and that led him of
course to the conclusion: that in order
to get closer to liberty, equality,
fraternity, and democracy, we had to go to
a different kind of system, one that was
fundamentally different from capitalism,
and for reasons that he will explain and
would explain to us, that was for him the
task; and to summarize in this first
introductory presentation, what it was he
found, it runs roughly like this: in the
slavery we reject, human beings were

Dutch: 
de elementen van een systeem vond dat het onmogelijk maakt om vrijheid, gelijkheid,
broederschap en democratie te hebben. Hij had het gevoel dat kapitalisme elke vooruitgang in die richting
door de mens bereikt, blokkeerde, voorkwam,  en dwarsboomde.
En dat leidde bij hem natuurlijk tot de conclusie, dat we om
dichter bij vrijheid, gelijkheid,
broederschap en democratie te komen, we  naar
een ander soort systeem zouden moeten gaan, eentje dat fundamenteel anders was dan het kapitalisme,
en om redenen die hij ons zou uitleggen.  Dat was voor hem de
taak. En om in deze eerste inleidende presentatie samen te vatten, wat  hij
dan wel vond, ziet het er ongeveer als volgt: in de voor ons verwerpelijke slavernij waren de mensen

Modern Greek (1453-): 
τα στοιχεία ενός συστήματος που το έκανε αδύνατον να έχει κανείς ελευθερία,ισότητα,
αδερφοσύνη και δημοκρατία.Ένοιωσε ότι ο καπιταλισμός μπλοκάριζε,εμπόδιζε
την όποια πρόοδο σε αυτές τις κατευθύνσεις είχαν καταφέρει οι άνθρωποι
και αυτό τον οδήγησε στο συμπέρασμα ότι για να φτάσει κανείς
πιο κοντά στην ελευθερία,αδερφοσύνη,και δημοκρατία θα έπρεπε να πάμε σε ένα
άλλου είδους σύστημα,τέτοιο που να είναι θεμελιακά διαφορετικό από τον καπιταλισμό
και για λόγους που θα εξηγούσε σε μας,αυτός ήταν για αυτόν ο
στόχος και για να συνοψίσουμε, αυτή τη πρώτη εισαγωγική παρουσίαση,τι ήταν αυτό που
βρήκε,χοντρικά βρήκε τούτο:στη δουλοκτησία που απορρίπτουμε,τα ανθρώπινα όντα ήταν

Portuguese: 
divididos em dois grupos, amos e
escravos. A riqueza, o poder, a dominação
cultural, estavam nas mãos do
Amos. Os escravos literalmente eram
propriedade dessas pessoas. o
a sociedade foi moldada, governada pelos
amos, para a reprodução do sistema
ao longo do tempo. Os amos queriam permanecer amos;
queriam que seus filhos, por sua vez fossem amo. Se você nascesse
naquela sociedade como escravo, seria era escravo e seus filhos seriam escravos. Para
Marx, esse era um sistema abominável, e ele o rejeitava. O mesmo se aplica ao
feudalismo. Nele as duas posições que se poderia ocupar, ou eram o Senhor, que
possuía, operava e executava, e dominava, como o faziam os amos na escravidão, mas

Dutch: 
verdeeld in twee groepen, meesters en
slaven. De rijkdom, de macht, het culturele
dominantie, was in handen van de
meesters. De slaven waren letterlijk
eigendom van die andere mensen. De
samenleving werd gevormd en bestuurd door de
meesters. Voor de voortzetting van het systeem wilden meesters  meesters blijven,
meesters wilden dat hun kinderen 
meesters op hun beurt zouden zijn. Als je geboren was
in die samenleving als slaaf, dan was je een slaaf, en je kinderen zouden slaven zijn. Voor
Marx  was dit een weerzinwekkend systeem, en hij
verwierp het. Hetzelfde geldt voor
feodalisme. Daar waren de twee plaatsen die je 
kon bezetten,  ofwel de heer, die
eigenaar was, die beheerde, runde en domineerde, net als de meesters in slavernij, echter was

English: 
divided into two groups, masters and
slaves. The wealth, the power, the cultural
dominance, was in the hands of the
Masters. The slaves literally were
property of those other people. The
society was shaped, governed run by the
masters, for the system's reproduction
over time. Masters wanted to stay masters;
masters wanted their children to be
masters in turn. If you were born into
that society as a slave, you were a slave,
and your children would be slaves. For
Marx, this was an abhorrent system, and he
rejected it. The same applies to
feudalism. There the two positions you
could occupy, were either the Lord, who
owned, and operated, and ran, and dominated,
much like the masters had in slavery, but

Modern Greek (1453-): 
χωρισμένα σε δύο κατηγορίες,αφεντικά και δούλοι.Ο πλούτος,η εξουσία,η πολιτισμική
κυριαρχία,ήταν στα χέρια των αφεντικών.Οι σκλάβοι ήσαν κυριολεκτικά
ιδιοκτησία αυτών των ανθρώπων.Η κοινωνία είχε σχηματοποιηθεί,κυβερνηθεί από τα
αφεντικά,για την αναπαραγωγή του συστήματος στο χρόνο.Τα αφεντικά ήθελαν να παραμείνουν αφεντικά
και ήθελαν τα παιδιά τους να γίνουν αφεντικά και αυτά.Αν γενιόσουν σε αυτή
τη κοινωνία σκλάβος,ήσουν σκλάβος,και ομοίως θα ήσαν και τα παιδιά σου.Για
τον Μαρξ αυτό ήταν ένα απεχθές σύστημα και το απέρριπτε.Το ίδιο ισχύει για την
φεουδαρχία.Εκεί οι δύο κοινωνικές θέσεις που θα μπορούσες να καταλάβεις,ήταν είτε του Λόρδου,
που κατείχε,λειτουργούσε ,"έτρεχε" και εξουσίαζε,όπως τα αφεντικά στην δουλοκτησία,όμως

Portuguese: 
a massa de pessoas não eram as
propriedade do Senhor. Eles eram livres, pelo
menos em relação ao que os escravos tinham si.do Mas eles eram servos. Se você tivesse
nascido em uma família de servos, você era ipso de fato um servo também. As duas posições eram uma
minoria de senhores e a maioria dos
servos, como uma minoria de amos e uma
maioria dos escravos. Agora, aqui está a frase de efeito de Marx:
O capitalismo, ele disse, não teve sucesso em romper com esse modelo. Alguns que
dominam e uma massa que não. Tudo que o capitalismo fez , segundo ele, foi substituir
as dicotomias de mestre / escravo, senhor / servo, com uma nova. Era diferente, e
nessa diferença, há muitas
lições importantes. Era diferente

English: 
the mass of other people weren't the
property of the Lord. They were free, at
least in relationship to what slaves had
been. But, they were serfs. If you were
born to a family of serfs, you were ipso
facto a serf too. The two positions were a
minority of lords, and a majority of
serfs, like a minority of masters and a
majority of slaves.
Now here comes Marx's punchline:
capitalism he said, wasn't successful in
breaking out of that model. A few who
dominate, a mass who don't. All that
capitalism did, he said, was to replace
the dichotomies of master/slave, Lord/serf, with a new one. It was different, and
in that difference, there's lots of
important lessons. It was different

Dutch: 
de massa van andere mensen geen eigendom van de heer. Ze waren vrij,
tenminste in vergelijking met slaven. Maar ze waren lijfeigenen. Als je was
geboren in een familie van lijfeigenen,  was je vanzelf ook een lijfeigene. De twee posities bestonden uit een
minderheid van heren, en een meerderheid van lijfeigenen, zoals een minderheid van meesters en een
meerderheid van slaven.
Nu komt de clou van Marx:
kapitalisme, zei hij, was niet succesvol in
 het breken met dat model. Een paar die
de touwtjes in handen hebben, en een massa die dat niet heeft. Het enige wat kapitalisme deed, zei hij, was om de
tegenstellingen van meester / slaaf, heer / lijfeigene, te vervangen met een nieuwe. Het was anders, en
in dat verschil zijn er veel
belangrijke lessen. Het was anders

Modern Greek (1453-): 
η μάζα των άλλων ανθρώπων δεν ήσαν ιδιοκτησία του Λόρδου.Ήσαν ελεύθεροι
τουλάχιστον σε σχέση με το τι ήταν οι σκλάβοι.Όμως ήσαν δουλοπάροικοι.Αν
γεννιόσουν σε μια οικογένεια δουλοπαροίκων θα ήσουν δουλοπάροικος και συ.Οι δύο κοινωνικές θέσεις ήσαν
μια μειοψηφία Λόρδων,και μια πλειοψηφία δουλοπαροίκων,όπως η μειοψηφία αφεντικών και η
πλειοψηφία σκλάβων.Εδώ λοιπόν υπογραμίζει ο Μαρξ.
Ο καπιταλισμός είπε δεν ήταν επιτυχής να εξαφανίσει αυτό το μοντέλο.Λίγοι που
εξουσιάζουν,η μάζα όχι.Αυτό που έκανε ο καπιταλισμός,ήταν λέει,να αντικαταστήσει
τους διαχωρισμούς του αφέντη/δούλου,λόρδου/δουλοπάροικου με έναν καινούριο.Ήταν καινούριος,και σε αυτήν
τη διαφορά υπάρχουν πολλά σημαντικά μαθήματα.¨Ηταν διαφορετικός

English: 
because, what?  The minority, which was
still there, had a new name: they were
called employers; and the majority also
had a new name: they were called
employees. But, when you look closely at
this system, Marx said, it's very much
like the slavery and the feudalism, which
it overthrew, because the dominant role
in society, is again played by the
employers. They control the politicians;
they control the direction of social
development; they make all the decisions
in the workplace; they run the show; they
dominated; and the mass of people are
subordinated. And so Marx said, we have to
ask how and why this system of

Portuguese: 
por quê? A minoria, que ainda existia, tinha um novo nome:
eram os empregadores; e a maioria também tinha um novo nome: eles foram chamados
empregados. Mas quando você olha atentamente, disse Marx, esse sistema é muito parecido
com a escravidão e o feudalismo, que ele havia derrubado, porque o papel dominante
na sociedade, era novamente representado pelos empregadores. Eles controlam os políticos;
eles controlam a direção do desenvolvimento social; eles tomam todas as decisões
no local de trabalho; eles dirigem o show; eles dominam; e a massa de pessoas é
subordinada. E assim Marx disse, temos que perguntar como e por que esse sistema

Modern Greek (1453-): 
για ποιο λόγο;Η μειοψηφία,που ήταν ακομη υπαρκτή,είχε ένα καινούριο όνομα.αποκαλούνταν
εργοδότες,και η πλειοψηφία είχε επίσης νέο όνομα,αποκαλούνταν
εργαζόμενοι.Όμως όταν κοιτάξεις από κοντά αυτό το σύστημα,είπε ο Μαρξ,μοιάζει πολύ
με τη δουλοκτησία και την φεουδαρχία, που ανέτρεψε,διότι ο κυρίαρχος ρόλος
στην κοινωνία,είναι πάλι από τους εργοδότες.Αυτοί ελέγχουν τους πολιτικούς
την κατεύθυνση της κοινωνικής ανάπτυξης,παίρνουν όλες τις αποφάσεις
στο χώρο εργασίας"τρέχουν την όλη παράσταση",κυριαρχούν,και η μάζα των ανθρώπων είναι
κυριαρχούμενη.Κι έτσι,ο Μαρξ είπε,πρέπει να αναρωτηθούμε πως και γιατί τούτο το σύστημα

Dutch: 
vanwege - wat? De minderheid, die
er nog steeds was, had een nieuwe naam: ze werden
werkgevers genoemd; en de meerderheid 
had ook een nieuwe naam: ze werden
werknemers genoemd. Maar als je goed 
naar dit systeem kijkt, zei Marx, heeft het veel weg
van de slavernij en het feodalisme, dat
het  omverwierp, omdat de dominante rol
in de samenleving wederom wordt  gespeeld door de
werkgevers. Zij controleren de politici,
zij bepalen de richting van sociale
ontwikkeling, zij nemen alle beslissingen
in de werkplaats. Zij runnen de show, zij
domineren, en de massa van mensen is
ondergeschikt. En dus zei Marx: we moeten wel vragen hoe en waarom dit systeem van

Portuguese: 
empregador-empregado, a que chamamos capitalismo, foi incapaz de trazer
liberdade, igualdade, fraternidade e
democracia que prometera. O que há
nessa relação entre empregador e empregado, que
reproduz uma sociedade atormentada por instabilidade, conflito, tensão, desigualdade,
a ausência de fraternidade e a zombaria  com a noção de democracia, começando
pelo local de trabalho, onde todo o
poder de decidir o que produzir, como
produzir, onde produzir, o que fazer 
com os lucros, é feito por um pequeno grupo
de pessoas no topo, enquanto todos
que trabalham produzindo esses lucros,
não têm voz. Isso não é democracia; é o seu oposto. Por fim, deixe-me apontar

Modern Greek (1453-): 
εργοδότη/εργαζόμενου,που ονομάζουμε καπιταλισμό,ήταν ανίκανο να κατανοήσει
την ελευθερία,την ισότητα,την αδερφοσύνη και την δημοκρατία τα οποία υποσχέθηκε.Τι είναι αυτό
στη σχέση ανάμεσα στον εργοδότη και εργαζομενο,που
αναπαράγει μια κοινωνία που ταλαιπωρείται από αστάθεια,σύγκρουση,ένταση,ανισότητα
την απουσία αδερφοσύνης,και τον χλευασμό του νοήματος της δημοκρατίας,που αρχίζει
στο χώρο εργασίας,όπου όλη η εξουσία απόφασης τι να παραχθεί,πως να
παραχθεί,που να παραχθεί και τι να απογίνει με τα κέρδη,αποφασίζεται από μια μικρή ομάδα
ανθρώπων στη κορυφή,ενώ όλοι όσοι εργάζονται για να παράγουν τα κέρδη
δεν έχουν καθόλου λόγο.Αυτό δεν είναι δημοκρατία αλλά το αντίθετό της.Τέλος ας υπογραμίσω

Dutch: 
werkgever-werknemer, dat we 
kapitalisme noemen,  niet in staat was om de
vrijheid, gelijkheid, broederschap, en
democratie die het had beloofd, te verwezenlijken. Wat
is het met de relatie tussen de
werkgever en de werknemer, dat
een samenleving wordt gekweekt die wordt gekweld door instabiliteit, conflict, spanning, ongelijkheid,
de afwezigheid van broederschap, en die een aanfluiting is voor de notie van democratie, te beginnen
precies op de werkplek, waar alle
macht voor de beslissingen om wat te produceren, hoe
te produceren, waar te produceren, wat
met de winst te doen, ligt bij een kleine groep
van mensen aan de top, terwijl iedereen
die werk verricht om diezelfde winsten te produceren,
helemaal niets te zeggen heeft. Dat is geen democratie, dat is het tegenovergestelde. Laat me tot slot wijzen,

English: 
employer-employee, which we call
capitalism, was unable to realize the
liberty, equality, fraternity, and
democracy that it had promised. What is
it about the relationship between the
employer and the employee, that
reproduces a society bedeviled by
instability, conflict, tension, inequality,
the absence of fraternity, and a mockery
of the notion of democracy, starting
right in the work place, where all the
power to decide what to produce, how to
produce, where to produce, what to do 
with the profits, is made by a tiny group
of people at the top, whereas everybody
who works producing those very profits,
has no say at all. That's not democracy;
that is its opposite. Lastly, let me point

Dutch: 
voordat we in de details gaan over wat de bijdrage van Marx was ten aanzien van
het analyseren van het kapitalisme -want dat is wat hij in zijn leven deed- laat me een andere reden
duidelijk maken, waarom het de moeite waard is om een kijkje te nemen in zijn bijdragen. Marx stierf in 1883,
dus ongeveer honderdveertig jaar geleden.
Dat is historisch gezien niet erg lang.
Maar in die relatief korte periode van
140 jaar verspreidden Marx 'ideeën zich naar elk
land op deze planeet.
Mensen in totaal verschillende
economische, politieke en culturele
omstandigheden, vonden een enorme betekenis in
wat Marx schreef. Dat is waarom er in elk
land marxistische organisaties,
marxistische vakbonden, marxistische kranten, marxistische gemeenschappen, marxistische politieke

Modern Greek (1453-): 
πριν μπούμε λεπτομερειακά στην συνεισφορά του Μαρξ στην
ανάλυση του καπιταλισμού,διότι αυτό έκανε στη ζωή του,ας κάνω ξεκάθαρο
άλλο ένα λόγο για τον οποίο αξίζει να δούμε την συνεισφορά του.Ο Μαρξ πέθανε το 1883,
περίπου πριν 140 χρόνια.Αυτό δεν είναι μεγάλο χρονικό διάστημα
αλλά σε αυτό το μάλλον μικρό διάστημα των 140 χρόνων,οι ιδέες του Μαρξ διαδώθηκαν σε κάθε
χώρα του πλανήτη.Ανθρωποι σε τελείως διαφορετικά
οικονομικές,,πολιτικές και πολιτισμικές συνθήκες βρήκαν μεγάλο νόημα
στα γραπτά του Μαρξ.Για αυτό το λόγο σε κάθε χώρα υπάρχουν Μαρξιστικές οργανώσεις,
Μαρξιστικές ενώσεις,εφημερίδες,Μαρξιστικές κοινότητες,Μαρξιστικά

Portuguese: 
antes de entrarmos nos detalhes da contribuição de Marx
para a análise do capitalismo, porque é isso que ele fez em sua vida, deixe-me esclarecer
outra razão pela qual vale a pena procurar
em suas contribuições. Marx morreu em 1883,
aproximadamente, cento e quarenta anos atrás. Isso não é muito longo no tempo histórico,
mas nesse período relativamente curto de 140 anos, as idéias de Marx se espalham por todos
os países na face deste planeta.
Pessoas de condições
econômico, político e cultural
completamente diferentes, encontraram um enorme significado
no que Marx escreveu. É por isso que em cada país, existem organizações marxistas,
Sindicatos marxistas, jornais marxistas,
Sociedades marxistas, partidos políticos

English: 
out, before we get into the nuts and
bolts of what Marx's contribution was in
analyzing capitalism, because that's what
he did in his life, let me make it clear
one other reason why it's worth looking
at his contributions. Marx died in 1883,
so roughly, a hundred and forty years ago.
That's not very long at historical time,
but in that relatively short period of
140 years, Marx's ideas spread to every
country on the face of this planet.
People in the most completely different
economic, political, and cultural
conditions, found enormous meaning in
what Marx wrote.  That's why in every
country, there are Marxist organizations,
Marxist unions, Marxist newspapers,
Marxists societies, Marxist political

English: 
parties, and so on. For me, to be able to
come before you, and say let's look at
what this man has to say, is simply to be
able to say, here and now to you, what has
been effectively said to literally every
peoples on this earth. If they all found
the meaning in it, my guess is we can and
we will do it; and that's what this
fourth, four-part series is intended to
do. Well, we've come to the end of part
one of these four parts. I hope you found
it interesting and worthwhile, and that
you will join with us in taking a look
at the other parts as well. Toward that
end, please be sure to visit patreon.com
that's patreon/economicupdate,
our regular
radio and television program. There you

Modern Greek (1453-): 
πολιτικά κόμματα,κ.λπ.Για μένα το να μπορώ να σας παρουσιαστώ και να πω ελάτε να δούμε
τι έχει να μας πει αυτός ο άνθρωπος,είναι απλά σα να μπορώ να μιλώ,εδώ και τώρα,αυτά που
έχουν ειπωθεί αποτελεσματικά σε,κυριολεκτικά,κάθε άνθρωπο σε αυτή τη γη, αν βρήκαν όλοι
νόημα σε αυτά,νομίζω,ότι μπορούμε και θα το κάνουμε και αυτό
σκοπέυει να κάνει αυτή η σιρά 4 μερών.Λοιπόν φτάσαμε στο τέλος του
πρώτου μέρους αυτών των 4 μερών.Ελπίζω να το βρήκατε ενδιαφέρον και ότι άξιζε,και ότι
θα παρακολουθήστε μαζί μας και τα άλλα μέρη επίσης.Καταλήγωντας
παρακαλώ επισκεφτείτε το Patreon.com και συγκεκριμένα το patreon/economicupdate,
που είναι το συνηθισμένο ραδιοτηλεοπτικό μας πρόγραμμα.Εκεί θα βρείτε

Portuguese: 
marxistas assim por diante. Para mim, ser capaz vir até vocês e dizer, vamos  ver
o que esse homem tem a dizer é simplesmente ser capaz de dizer, aqui e agora para vocês, o que
foi efetivamente dito literalmente a cada
povo da terra. Se todos eles encontrassem
o significado disso, meu palpite é que podemos e nós faremos; e é isso que esta
série de quatro partes visa fazer. Bem, chegamos ao final da parte
você vai se junte a nós para dar uma olhada nas outras partes também. Com esse objetivo
final, visite patreon.com
em patreon / economicupdate,
nosso programa de rádio e televisão  semanal. Ali você

Dutch: 
partijen, enzovoort zijn. Wat mij betreft, om hier voor jou aanwezig te kunnen zijn en te zeggen -laten we eens
kijken wat deze man te zeggen heeft- is simpel
om hier en nu tegen je te kunnen zeggen wat
eigenlijk verteld is tegen letterlijk alle
volkeren op deze aarde. Als zij er allemaal betekenis in
gevonden hebben, dan wed ik dat wij het ook kunnen en zullen vinden. En dat is wat de bedoeling is van
deze vierdelige serie. Wel, we zijn aan het einde van deel 1 gekomen
van de vier delen. Ik hoop dat je het interessant en de moeite waard vond, en dat
je samen met ons ook een kijkje zal nemen in de andere delen.
[einde vertaling]
 

Portuguese: 
encontrará as partes subseqüentes desta série de quatro partes; e lembre-se, nós
valorizamos nossa comunidade de Patreon, aqueles dentre vocês que nos seguem dessa maneira, é por isso que
estamos produzindo programas especiais como esse e claro, lembre-se também de nos seguir
no Facebook, Twitter e Instagram,
e em nossos sites,
democraciaatwork.info e rdwolff.com. Obrigado
pela sua atenção,
e vamos passar agora para a parte 2.

English: 
will find the subsequent installments of
this four-part series; and remember, we
value our Patreon community, those of you
that follow us in this way, that's why we
are producing special programs like this, and of
course, please remember also to follow us
on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram,
and on our websites,
democracyatwork.info and rdwolff.com. Thank you
for your attention,
and let's turn now to part 2.

Dutch: 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Modern Greek (1453-): 
τις κατοπινές μαγνητοσκοπήσεις της σειράς αυτής 4 μερών και να θυμάστε ότι
ευγνωμονούμε την Patreon κοινότητά μας,όσοι από σας μας παρακολουθείτε με τούτο το τρόπο,είναι γιατί
κάνουμε ειδικά προγράμματα όπως αυτό και ασφαλώς,παρακαλώ θυμηθείτε επίσης να μας ακολουθείτε
στο Facebook,Twitter και Instagram.Kαι στους ιστότοπους μας.
democracyatwork.infο και rdwolff.com.
Eυχαριστώ για την προσοχή σας.
και ας πάμε στο δεύτερο μέρος τώρα.
