One of the great accomplishments of the Apollo
missions was to bring home hundreds of kilograms
of lunar rock.
Suddenly, geologists had a lifetime’s worth
of lunar samples captured from several different
spots across the Moon.
These rocks and dust have been under continuous
analysis since the Apollo 11 astronauts came
home over 50 years ago.
And they’re still making discoveries.
Scientists have samples of the Sun’s solar
wind, particles from a comet’s tail, a few
grams from an asteroid, with more coming shortly.
But there’s one world, the focus of so much
scientific study, which has never had a sample
returned: Mars.
NASA and the European Space Agency have been
making plans to bring a sample home from Mars
for decades, and now, missions could fly in
the next few years, finally bringing a chunk
of the Red Planet home to Earth for us to
study directly.
Space exploration happens in stages.
First you start with a scouting flyby, where
a spacecraft goes on a quick trajectory past
a world, providing an initial set of images
and data.
Think of the Voyager’s Grand Tour through
the Solar System, or New Horizons visiting
Pluto.
Then you return with an orbiter, a spacecraft
that can remain in place for years, studying
the surface of a world in great detail.
Consider the Cassini spacecraft, which orbited
Saturn 294 times, took more than 450,000 pictures,
and changed our understanding of the Ringed
Planet forever.
Then come the landers and rovers.
Of course, the best example of this is Mars,
with Spirit and Opportunity, as well as Curiosity,
which together have captured hundreds of thousands
of images, drilled rocks, and found evidence
of past water on Mars.
Then come the sample return missions.
This is the stage that the space agencies
have only tried a few times.
Apart from the Apollo mission, the first spacecraft
to bring samples from space back to Earth
were the Soviet’s Luna mission.
In 1970, Luna 16 brought home 101 grams of
lunar regolith, followed by Luna 20, and Luna
24.
Although they brought a fraction of the material
returned by the Apollo missions, it was from
different locations on the Moon.
The next spacecraft to return a sample home
was NASA’s Genesis mission.
It was launched in 2001 to collect samples
of the Sun’s solar wind, and bring them
back home to Earth.
It opened up its sample collectors on April
1, 2004, and then returned to Earth in September
of the same year.
Unfortunately, its parachute failed to open
properly, and the spacecraft smashed hard
into the Utah desert.
Despite the hard landing, scientists were
able to retrieve usable samples, which helped
them discover that the Earth might have formed
from different solar nebula materials than
the Sun.
Then came NASA’s Stardust mission, which
flew through the tail of Comet Wild 2 in January
2004, and then returned its collector capsule
back to Earth two years later.
Analysis of these particles showed scientists
that comets contained particles ejected from
the Sun early on in its history, and might
had a different way of forming than astronomers
had predicted.
The last sample return mission was JAXA’s
Hayabusa mission, overcoming all kinds of
difficulties, including getting directly hit
by a solar flare, and the loss of its reaction
wheels, and the failure to deploy its hopping
lander.
But incredibly, mission controllers were able
to get the spacecraft home, with a few precious
micrograms of asteroid material on board.
There are missions out there right now: Hayabusa
2 and OSIRIS-REx which will be bringing even
more asteroid samples back home to study.
JAXA is even planning a mission to return
a sample from the moons of Mars.
So what about a sample return mission to Mars
itself?
Answer the Question:
We’ve actually learned quite a bit about
the geology and atmosphere of Mars because
there are chunks of the Red Planet found here
on Earth.
They were smashed out of Mars by a giant asteroid
impact millions of years ago, and they floated
through space, eventually striking Earth and
incredibly surviving a trip through the atmosphere.
Scientists have random pieces of Mars, but
now they want a sample of their choosing.
And that means sending a sample return mission
directly.
NASA has actually been planning for a Mars
sample return mission since the early 1970s,
even before the launch of the Viking spacecraft.
The goals of a return mission would include
the search for life, not just life today,
but past life, and even the chemical precursors
of life.
By returning pristine samples of Mars back
home, scientists could perform all kinds of
experiments on the Martian regolith, exposing
it to water, thicker atmosphere and nutrients
to see if there’s any active bacteria.
This experiment was attempted with Viking,
but the results were inconclusive and planetary
biologists still argue over them.
They could analyze the samples under powerful
microscopes, searching for any microscopic
fossils, or any other indication there’s
life there.
In addition, scientists could understand the
history of the surface of Mars, and how it
was affected by water over millions of years.
Samples could be returned from some of the
most interesting spots, like the sediments
of lakes, deposits around hydrothermal vents,
and the deltas of ancient rivers.
They could bring back samples from recent
and ancient meteorite strikes, volcanic eruptions,
and regions that were exposed to wind for
a long time.
They could also study the long term history
of Mars over billions of years, to try and
understand when vast planetary changes occurred
to make the planet so cold and dry.
When did the asteroid bombardment settle down?
They could even sample pieces of the meteorites
that litter the surface of Mars, sampling
other worlds at the same time.
These samples would ideally be sent home before
the first human sets foot on the surface of
Mars.
We already know there’s toxic chemicals
in the Martian regolith, but what about the
dust that settles out of the atmosphere?
Will it be a risk if astronauts breathe it?
What about material that’s deeper down below
the surface?
By studying this material, scientists would
also be able to understand how well astronauts
could live off the land.
To use regolith for building material, and
growing plants.
As well as breaking it up chemically for various
raw materials.
Are different parts of Mars more useful than
others?
As you can see, we’ve got a lot of questions
that a sample return mission could help answer.
Next we’ll talk about the actual missions
in the works to make it happen, but first
I’d like to thank:
John Bilderback
Ronny Blake
Norman Todd
David Filmer
And the rest of our 812 patrons for their
generous support.
Educational content should be freely available
to anyone in the world.
The Patrons make this possible.
Join our community at patreon.com/universetoday
and get in on the action.
One of the earliest plans for a sample return
mission to Mars was called the Sample Collection
for Investigation of Mars (or SCIM).
This would be a relatively inexpensive scout-class
mission that would fly through the atmosphere
of Mars as low as 40 km altitude, collecting
dust and atmospheric gas.
This would be high enough so the spacecraft
wouldn’t be captured by Mars.
Then it would return the samples to Earth.
By studying these samples, scientists could
match up the atmospheric sample with the gases
found in those Mars rocks to be certain they
came from the Red Planet.
They’d be able to study the Martian dust
up close, you know, the dust that can form
planet-wide storms capable of ending rover
missions, and could be a risk for future astronauts.
The proposal was made in 2001, for a mission
that would fly in 2007 and return samples
by 2010, but it never got off the ground.
But in 2009, NASA and the European Space Agency
started making serious plans to bring a piece
of Mars home, formally announcing their cooperation
on a mission.
Anticipating the future sample return mission,
both NASA and ESA have built their upcoming
rovers to be the first stage in sending material
back home.
As it crawls across the surface of the Red
Planet, NASA’s Mars 2020 rover will collect
interesting samples and then drop them on
the surface as it goes.
ESA’s Rosalind Franklin rover, also due
for launch in 2020, will collect and store
samples from the surface of Mars in pen-sized
canisters, which will be ready for pickup.
A sample return mission would have three parts.
First, there’d be a fast-moving fetch rover
built by the European Space Agency to collect
samples for study.
Then a NASA ascent vehicle which would transfer
the samples to Mars orbit.
And finally, an orbiting mission from ESA
that would retrieve the samples and bring
them back to Earth.
ESA’s Sample Fetch Rover would be a relatively
light-weight vehicle, no greater than about
120 kilograms.
It would need to be able to travel 20-30 kilometers
going 200 meters per day, autonomously routing
around hazards in its way.
Over the course of this period, it would pick
up dozens of samples left on the surface by
Mars 2020 or Rosalind Franklin, choosing the
30 or so most scientifically interesting to
send home.
After several months of collecting samples,
the Fetch Rover would arrive at the Mars Sample
Retrieval Lander.
This is a spacecraft that has many similarities
to NASA’s Curiosity and Mars 2020 rovers.
It would use a heatshell then parachute as
it enters the Martian atmosphere, finally
lowering the ascent rocket to the surface
of Mars.
It would sit on Mars for up to 150 days, waiting
for samples from the Fetch Rover.
When the samples were loaded on board, the
Ascent Vehicle would fire its hybrid or solid
rocket motor, carrying the samples into a
350-km altitude orbit.
Then it would be intercepted by ESA’s Earth
Return Orbiter, making a completely autonomous
rendezvous millions of kilometers from Earth.
It’ll then use a solar-electric ion engine
to make the long journey back to Earth.
And then, some time in the 2030s, scientists
will get their hands on about 500 grams of
material from the surface of Mars.
In early 2019, the White House included money
in their proposed budget for a Mars Sample
Return mission, which ideally could launch
as soon as 2026.
Although a mission like this has been proposed
many times before, this is the first time
that actual funding was set aside.
It gave NASA $109 million in 2020 to work
on “future Mars activities” which is essentially
the sample return mission.
So now, after almost 50 years of planning,
a serious sample return mission to Mars is
in the works.
What do you think?
Is retrieving a sample from Mars a big priority?
Let me know your thoughts in the comments.
Once a week I gather up all my space news
into a single email newsletter and send it
out.
It’s got pictures, brief highlights about
the story, and links so you can find out more.
Go to universetoday.com/newsletter to sign
up.
Did you know that all of my videos are also
available in a handy audio podcast format,
so you can have the latest episodes as well
as special bonus material like interviews
with me show up right on your audio device.
Go to universetoday.com/audio, or search for
Universe Today on iTunes, Spotify or wherever
you get your podcasts.
I’ll put a link in the shownotes.
And finally, here’s a playlist.
