In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court
legalized abortion nationwide.
The decision is called Roe vs Wade, and
those who defend it are known as RoeBots.
This is how they think...
*Robot Voice*
First off, there are several 
national organizations
dedicated to the adoption of children 
who are not white and not healthy.
In fact, there are waiting lists of parents
who are willing to adopt 
minority and mixed race babies,
as well as those with even the
most severe physical challenges.
The truth is, the chances of any newborn 
baby not being adopted are almost zero.
As for the foster care issue, 
since the children in that system
are already born, that problem 
has nothing to do with abortion.
It is two entirely separate groups of children.
Of course, abortion apologists will tell 
you that if newborns were not available,
families would be more likely 
to adopt these older children.
In other words, the pro-choice 
position is that we should
force people to take the children
society needs them to adopt
by brutally slaughtering the 
children they want to adopt.
Now, if the abortion lobby 
really expects us to believe
that they are only killing 
babies no one wants,
I suggest that we create a national registry 
of people who want to adopt a baby.
It would be open to any adult who 
can meet reasonable standards
for becoming an adoptive parent, and 
they could agree to adopt one baby -
or as many as they can reasonably care for.
Then, any woman who wants an 
abortion could go to the registry,
and if no one was available to adopt her baby,
she would be given documentation that 
would allow her to hire an abortionist.
But if there was someone willing 
and qualified to adopt her baby,
it would not be legal to have the child killed.
Of course, the abortion industry is 
never going to accept this deal
because they know it would put 
them out of business overnight.
They are fully aware that there is 
no such thing as an unwanted baby
and that every helpless child they 
butcher is wanted by someone.
Thanks for watching!
