
Polish: 
Kiedy wypuszczono pierwszy balon, który mógł przenosić ludzi - to było w Paryżu w
końcówce 17 stulecia i byli to bracia Montgolfier, mieli balony wodorowe i z gorącym powietrzem
to był przełom naukowy.
najbardziej zaawansowana technologia.
Dopiero co się nauczyliśmy gromadzić taki gaz jak wodór, który jest lżejszy od powietrza
i mogłeś unieść się w balonie i pierwszy balon wzleciał, był tami Ben Franklin i to było
coś wielkiego i wspaniałego, wszyscy ci naukowcy
No i wzleciał, ale wyrwał się spod kontroli i poleciał sobie lądując gdzieś w polach
15 mil od Paryża, a wieśniacy tam zaatakowali go widłami bo
myśleli, że to obcy pojawił się z kosmosu.
Ta przepaść między wyuczonym zrozumieniem i postępem naukowym a przeciętnym zrozumieniem
co jest normalne była tak blisko - tylko 15 mil dalej.

Portuguese: 
Quando os primeiros balões foram lançados, que podiam transportar pessoas, foi em Paris
nos finais de 1700, e foram os irmãos Montgolfier, tinham balões de hidrogénio e ar-quente
que eram o mais avançado da ciência,
eram a tecnologia de ponta da altura.
Tínhamos acabado de aprender a capturar um gás, como o hidrogénio que era mais leve do que o ar,
e poderíamos pegar num balão e o primeiro balão ergue-se, Ben Franklin estava presente,
enorme e magnificente, e todos aqueles cientistas.
E ergue-se mas perderam o controlo e acabou por aterrar longe já nas zonas rurais
a 15 milhas de Paris e os camponeses aí atacaram-no com as suas forquilhas porque
pensavam que era um ser vindo do espaço.
A divisão entre conhecimento aprendido e procura cientifica e a percepção comum
do que era normal estavam assim tão próximas, apenas 15 milhas de distância.

English: 
When the very first balloon was launched that
could carry people it was in Paris in the
late 1700s and it was Montgolfier the brothers,
they had hydrogen balloons and hot air balloons
and it was the cutting edge of science.
It was the cutting edge of technology.
We just learned how to capture a gas like
hydrogen that would be lighter than air as
you could take a balloon and the first balloon
rose and Ben Franklin was there and it was
huge and magnificent, all of those scientists.
And it rose but it got out of control and
it went and landed out in the countryside
15 miles away from Paris and the peasants
there attacked it with pitchforks because
they thought it was an alien coming from space.
The schism between learned understanding and
scientific pursuit and the common perception
of what was normal was that close just 15
miles away.

English: 
It was an enormous gap between what we knew
and what we were doing and what a lot of folks
knew yet or what had become part of common
knowledge.
So there's nothing new about the speed with
which we're inventing things and the ability
for people to understand what's going on.
There's a recent populous sort of wave of
anti-science as if that's something new.
It's mostly because social media has given
everybody what appears to be an equal voice.
On the corner of Hyde Park in London there's
Speakers Corner and that used to be the Internet
where you could go stand there and yell any
stupid thing you wanted and if people wanted
to gather around and listen that was their
choice, but if you weren't interested in whatever
that person was spouting then you didn't need
to listen.
But now the Internet has sort of turned everything
into the Speakers Corner so you really have
to just decide what are you going to listen
to and what aren't you.
And if someone decides to put forward some
stupid idea that is patently false like if

Polish: 
To była ogromna luka między tym co poznaliśmy i stworzyliśmy a co większość ludu
jeszcze nie wiedziała czy nie stało się to wiedzą powszechną.
Więc nie ma nic nowego w tym jak szybko odkrywamy rzeczy a zdolnością
ludzi do poznania tego co się dzieje.
Jest teraz taka populistyczna fala antynaukowa, wcale nie jest niczym nowym.
Głównie dlatego, że media społecznościowe dały wszystkim bez wyjątku wydawałoby się równe prawo głosu.
Na rogu Hyde Parku w Londynie jest narożnik mówców, który był takim Internetem
gdzie mogłeś stanąć i wykrzyczeć najgłupsze rzeczy, które chciałeś i jeśli ludzie chcieli
się zebrać i posłuchać to był ich wybór, jeśli jednak nie interesowało cię cokolwiek
co ta osoba tam wywrzaskiwała, nie musiałeś słuchać.
Ale teraz Internet zamienił wszystko w taki narożnik mówców więc tak naprawdę musisz
zdecydować sam czego będziesz słuchać a czego nie.
I jeśli ktoś zdecyduje ogłosić jakąś głupią opinię, która jest z w sposób oczywisty fałszywa jakby

Portuguese: 
Era uma fosso enorme entre o que sabíamos e o que fazíamos e o que um grupo de pessoas
já sabiam ou o que haveria de fazer parte do conhecimento comum.
Assim, não há nada de novo na rapidez com que inventamos coisas e a habilidade
das pessoas em compreender o que se passa.
Surgiu recentemente um tipo de onda popular anti-ciência como se fosse algo novo.
É principalmente porque a comunicação social deu a todos igual direito de expressão.
Numa esquina de Hyde Park em Londres existia a esquina dos discursos, que era como a internet de antes,
onde qualquer um poderia ir e falar para todos qualquer estupidez que desejasse e se as pessoas quisessem
juntar-se e ouvir era uma escolha delas e se não estivessem interessadas naquilo
que a pessoa estivesse a dizer não tinham que o ouvir.
Mas hoje em dia a internet quase que tornou tudo na esquina dos discursos, de forma que temos
que decidir o que vamos ouvir e o que não vamos ouvir.
E se alguém decide promover uma ideia estúpida que é inegavelmente falsa como

Portuguese: 
se alguém dissesse "o céu é cor-de-laranja", podes ter uma discussão sobre isso se quiseres, mas é
obviamente falso, por isso não faz qualquer sentido sequer iniciar um dialogo desses.
Ou se alguém diz que o mundo é plano, é algo inegavelmente falso por isso não faz qualquer sentido
iniciar um dialogo porque a única coisa que estaremos a fazer é dar credibilidade a essa pessoa em algo
que sabemos à milhares de anos não ser verdade.
Em nem sequer me preocupo com isso.
O mundo está cheio de descobertas fascinantes e interessantes e estamos a desafiar
as fronteiras do que sabemos.
Stephen Hawking, que recentemente morreu, deixou um enorme trabalho tentando compreender
como o universo funciona, o pensamento inovador, e existem tantas pessoas motivadas e brilhantes,
porque haverias de encetar um dialogo com alguém que esta a ser deliberadamente ignorante?
Não me preocupo com as pessoas que não sabem, estão no processo de aprendizagem, mas
se alguém decide pegar nos factos e ser deliberadamente estúpido sobre eles, então eu penso

Polish: 
ktoś powiedział: niebo jest pomarańczowe. Możesz się z nim wykłócać jeśli chcesz, ale jest to
oczywista nieprawda, więc nie ma sensu nawet rozpoczynać dyskusji.
Albo jak ktoś mówi: Ziemia jest płaska; jest to wyraźna nieprawda, więc nie ma sensu zaczynać
dyskusji, ponieważ jedyne co osiągasz to dodanie tej osobie wiarygodności w związku z czymś
o czym wiemy od tysiącleci, że jest nieprawdziwe.
Nawet się tym nie przejmuję
Świat jest pełen fasynujących, interesującyh nowych odkryć i przekraczamy nowe
granice tego co wiemy.
Stephen Hawking, który niedawno zmarł. Jego prace nad zrozumieniem jak
działa wszechświat. Odkrywcze myślenie... Jest dookoła tak wiele świetnych, zmotywowanych ludzi
że... dlaczego zadawałbyś się z kimś, kto jest ignorantem z wyboru?
I nie mam problemu z ludźmi, którzy po prostu nie wiedzą. Oni się ciągle uczą
Ale jeśli ktoś zdecydował się zabrać się za fakty i celowo robić z siebie głupca w tej sprawie

English: 
somebody says the sky is orange, you can have
an argument about it if you want, but it's
obviously not true so there's really no point
in even engaging in conversation.
Or if somebody says the world is flat, it's
patently untrue so there's no point in engaging
in conversation because all you're doing is
giving that person credibility for something
that we've known for thousands of years to
not be truth.
I don't even worry about it.
The world is full of fascinating interesting
new discoveries and we're pushing the very
boundaries of what we know.
Stephen Hawking, who just recently died, the
work that he did in trying to understand how
the universe works the original thinking there's
so many brilliant motivated people around
that's why would you engage with someone who
is being deliberately ignorant?
I don't mind people that just don't know when
they're just in the process of learning, but
if someone has chosen to take the facts and
be deliberately stupid about them then I think

Polish: 
to myślę, że sami wyłączyli się z racjonalnej dyskusji, więc nawet nie zwracam uwagi.
Jeśli siłujesz się ze świnią, to najlepsze  czym możesz być to świński zapaśnik. Więc ja chcę osiągnąć więcej
niż to.
Więc tylko dlatego, że ktoś coś mówi - nieważne jak wielki ma megafon, nie
znaczy to, że zasługują na rozmowę.
Po prostu użyj rozumu, po to wszyscy go mamy i wybierz kogo będziesz ignorował

English: 
they've discounted themselves from rational
conversation so I don't bother.
If you wrestle with a pig the best you can
be is a pig wrestler; I want to do better
than that.
So just because somebody says something, no
matter how big their megaphone is, it doesn't
mean that they deserve conversation.
Just use your own brain, that's why we each
have one, and choose who you're going to disregard.

Portuguese: 
que são eles próprios quem se exclui de um dialogo racional, com isso não me preocupo.
Se lutas com um porco o melhor que poderás ser é um lutador de porcos; eu quero ser melhor
do que isso.
Por isso, só porque alguém diz algo, não importa quão alto, não quer
dizer que merecem dialogo.
Usem o vosso cérebro, é por isso que todos temos um e escolham bem que vão ignorar.
