[Intro music playing]
When Israel was a nation, they agreed to
a set of covenant laws at Mount Sinai as
part of a special contract with Yah. It
meant that they were to be his people
and he would in turn be their Elohim. Now,
as with all contracts, which usually
involve at least two parties, in this
case Yah and Israel, both parties were
bound by certain agreements which were
spelled out in the contract, or covenant.
The ancient people of Israel were told
that if they obeyed the laws of the covenant,
they would have Yah’s protection
and be showered with many blessings. If
they disobeyed, they would receive
punishment and suffer many curses.
Sadly, our ancestors chose the latter, and
following that fateful decision, the
nation of Israel was thereafter thrust
into a series of events that eventually
resulted in a time of trouble and
punishment whose ill effects are still
felt to this very day.
Before long, Ancient Israel experienced a
civil war and eventually split into two Kingdoms,
with the tribe of Judah leading a two-tribe
Kingdom to the south and ten tribes
forming a kingdom to the north.
After a period of self-rule, the independence of
the Northern Kingdom was threatened by
the Assyrians. We get that account in the
book of Second Kings. Hoshea son of Elah
to rule over Israel in the twelfth
year of King Ahaz’s reign in Judah. He
reigned in Samaria nine years. He did
what was evil in Yah’s sight, but not to the
same extent as the kings of Israel who
ruled before him. King Shalmaneser of Assyria
attacked King Hoshea, so Hoshea was forced
to pay heavy tribute to Assyria. But Hoshea
stopped paying the annual tribute
and conspired against the king
of Assyria by asking King So of Egypt
to help him shake free of Assyria’s power.
When the king of Assyria discovered this
treachery, he seized Hoshea and put him
in prison. Then the king of Assyria
invaded the entire land, and for three
years he besieged the city of Samaria.
Finally, in the ninth year of King
Hoshea’s reign, Samaria fell, and the people
of Israel were exiled to Assyria. They
were settled in colonies in Halah, along
the banks of the Habor River in Gozan, and
in the cities of the Medes. This disaster
came upon the people of Israel because
they worshiped other deities. They sinned
against Yah their Elohim, who had brought
them safely out of Egypt and had rescued
them from the power of Pharaoh, the
 king of Egypt. They had followed the
practices of the pagan nations Yah had
driven from the land ahead of them, as
well as the practices the kings of
Israel had introduced. This gives us a
good picture of why the Northern Kingdom
punished by being exiled to Assyria,
but later, Judah, which was the only
kingdom left, also ended up doing that
which was not right in the sight of Yah.
Second Kings chapter 24 informs us that the
last independent king of Judah, Jehoiachin,
reigned for eight years, practicing evil,
before Yah unleashed the forces of
Babylon on the Kingdom of Judah, which
ended in that nation being led away
captive as well. 70 long years of
captivity was experienced in Babylon, and
the ancient Israelites witnessed the
fall of that empire and the rise of the
next. After the 70 years had expired, the
new Persian king, Cyrus the Great, allowed
the people of Judah to return to their
homeland and rebuild. This event was
recorded in the Scriptures. In the first
year of King Cyrus of Persia, Yah
fulfilled the prophecy he had given
through Jeremiah. He stirred the heart of
Cyrus to put this proclamation in writing
and to send it throughout his kingdom:
This is what King Cyrus of Persia says:
"Yah, the Elohim of heaven, has given me
all the kingdoms of the earth. He has
appointed me to build him
a Temple at Jerusalem, which is in Judah. Any
of you who are his people may go to
Jerusalem in Judah to rebuild this
Temple of Yah, the Elohim of Israel,
who lives in Jerusalem. And may your
Elohim be with you! Wherever this Hebrew
remnant is found, let their neighbors
contribute toward their expenses by
giving them silver and gold, supplies for
the journey, and livestock, as well as a
voluntary offering for the Temple of
Elohim in Jerusalem." That second temple
was indeed rebuilt, and it existed until
the time of Yeshua, who prophesied its
ultimate destruction. Sadly, many of the
people of Judah rejected Yeshua, as they
failed to understand the many prophesies
and types that pointed to him, such as
those found in Exodus 12 verse 5,
Zechariah 13 verse 6, Genesis 49 verse 10,
Isaiah 7 verse 14, Micah 5 verse 2, and
so many others. Yeshua highlighted their
rejection of him in several parables.
A notable one is the parable of the evil
farmers, which can be found in Matthew 21
verses 33 to 46, and in it Yeshua reveals
what the rejection of the nation he was
sent to would result in. Following the
fulfillment of the parable of the evil
farmers, wherein they murdered the son of
the vineyard owner, that being Yeshua, and
after the rejection of his emissaries,
the fate of Judah and Jerusalem was
pretty much sealed. Yeshua
prophesied the destruction of Jerusalem
and pointed to the future of the people
of Judah, which was right in line with
the curses of Deuteronomy 28. And when you
see Jerusalem surrounded by armies,
then you will know that the time of its
destruction has arrived. Then those in
Judea must flee to the hills. Those in
Jerusalem must get out, and those out in
the country should not return to the city.
For those will be days of Elohim’s
vengeance, and the prophetic words of
the Scriptures will be fulfilled.
How terrible it will be for pregnant women
and for nursing mothers in those days.
For there will be disaster in the land
and great anger against this people.
They will be killed by the sword or sent
away as captives to all the nations of
the world. And Jerusalem will be trampled
down by the Gentiles until the period of
the Gentiles comes to an end. This
particular prophecy, as you can see,
stretched throughout time, with Jerusalem
being controlled by the Romans who
were the first to march on her following
Yeshua's prediction. Roman rule lasted
for hundreds of years after the initial
siege. Then the Romans eventually lost
hold of Jerusalem to the Muslims, and
thereafter various Caliphates controlled
Jerusalem until the time of the Crusades.
During this long period, Popes allied
with European Kings to fight against
Muslims. The Crusades were first and
foremost an expression of Papal
authority against the enemies of the
Church. The First Crusade was preached by
a pope, Pope Urban II in France in the
year 1095. With reference to the muslims
and in their advance in Europe and in
Jerusalem, I think the Christians in
Europe believed that the Islamic message
of Muhammad was against and
contradictory to what the Christians
were saying. They were worried that this
idea could possibly overrun the
Christian idea.
Pope Urban conceived this idea: "It's not
a sin if you kill non-Christians, if you
kill non-Believers in our faith." And so,
he made this deal that if you go and
fight in the Holy Land, you will be
forgiven all your past sins. A knight
could sin as much as he liked, and simply
by going to the Holy Land, he had been
given his passport to Heaven, and that
was an extremely attractive deal and
combined with that he could win fame, he
could win glory, and he could come back
with the treasures of the Near East.
These are the things that drew knights
in their tens of thousands to go on
crusade. The bloodletting of the
Crusaders spread throughout the Islamic
lands. Everybody heard stories about the
massacre of unarmed individuals. It
created this intense rage amongst
Muslims. In a sense, it resulted in a new
kind of Muslim crusade, a desire to raise
an army to go back to liberate Jerusalem
from the Crusaders as an act of piety on
the part of Muslims. I don't think any of
those young men either Christian or
Muslim could possibly have imagined that
their struggle could possibly still be
playing itself out a thousand years
later in the area that we call the
Middle East today.
Following the Crusades, control of
Jerusalem went from Mongol Warriors,
to Egyptian Mamalukes,
to the Ottoman Empire, who surrendered
Jerusalem to the British on December 9,
1917. That event led to the modern-day
circumstance, which allowed for the
establishment of an Israeli state, which
is currently occupied by Gentile posers
pretending to be the people of Israel,
as stated in Revelation chapter 2 verse 9
and chapter 3 verse 9. As prophesied by
Yeshua, "Jerusalem would be trampled down
by the Gentiles until the period of the
Gentiles comes to an end." That means that
Gentiles would be in Jerusalem, trampling
it down till the very last day, when
Yeshua comes. In other words, the people
in that land calling themselves Israel,
are really Gentiles. But let one of them
tell you himself. In his book,
The Thirteenth Tribe, Arthur
Koestler, himself a so-called Jew,
writes in the very first chapter: About the
time when Charlemagne was crowned
Emperor of the West, the eastern
confines of Europe between the
Caucasus and the Volga were ruled by a
Jewish state, known as the Khazar Empire.
At the peak of its power, from the seventh to
the tenth centuries AD, it played a
significant part in shaping the
destinies of mediaeval, and consequently
of modern, Europe. . . . The country of the
Khazars, a people of Turkish stock,
occupied a strategic key position at the
vital gateway between the Black Sea and
the Caspian, where the great eastern
powers of the period confronted each
other. It acted as a buffer protecting
Byzantium against invasions by the lusty
barbarian tribesmen of the northern
steppes. . . . But equally, or even more
important both from the point of view of
Byzantine diplomacy and of European
history, is the fact that the Khazar
armies effectively blocked the Arab
avalanche in its most devastating early
stages, and thus prevented the Muslim
conquest of Eastern Europe. . . .
It is perhaps not surprising, given these
circumstances, that in 732 -- after a
resounding Khazar victory over the Arabs --
the future Emperor Constantine V married
a Khazar princess. In due time their son
became the Emperor Leo IV, known
as Leo the Khazar. Ironically, the last
battle in the war, AD 737, ended in a
Khazar defeat. But by that time the impetus
of the Muslim Holy War was spent, the
Caliphate was rocked by internal
dissensions, and the Arab invaders
retraced their steps across the Caucasus
without having gained a permanent
foothold in the north, whereas the Khazars
became more powerful than they had
previously been. A few years later,
probably AD 740, the King, his court
and the military ruling class embraced the
Jewish faith, and Judaism became the
state religion of the Khazars. No doubt
their contemporaries were as astonished
by this decision as modern scholars were
when they came across the evidence in
the Arab, Byzantine, Russian and Hebrew
sources. . . . What is in dispute is the fate
of the Jewish Khazars after the
destruction of their empire, in the twelfth
or thirteenth century. On this problem the sources
are scant, but various late mediaeval Khazar
settlements are mentioned in the Crimea,
in the Ukraine, in Hungary, Poland and
Lithuania. The general picture that
emerges from these fragmentary pieces of
information is that of a migration of
Khazar tribes and communities into those
regions of Eastern Europe -- mainly Russia
and Poland -- where, at the dawn of the
Modern Age, the greatest concentrations
of Jews were found. This has led several
historians to conjecture that a
substantial part, and perhaps the
majority of eastern Jews -- and hence
of world Jewry -- might be of Khazar, and not of
Semitic Origin. . . . The large majority of
surviving Jews in the world is of
Eastern European -- and thus perhaps mainly
of Khazar -- origin. If so, this would mean
that their ancestors came not
from the Jordan but from the Volga, not
not from Canaan but from the Caucasus, once
believed to be the cradle of the Aryan
race; and that genetically they are more
closely related to the Hun, Uyghur and
Magyar tribes than to the seed of 
Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
Tell me, what did you mean in the title
of your book that the Jewish people had
been invented? It isn't a provocation, I
meant it, I think that the Jewish people
was invented like the French people, like
the Italian people. You see to build
nations in the modern times, historians
started to build to the past peoples and
between these peoples, I think that in
the second half of the 19th century, the
Jewish people were invented. Shlomo Sand,
an Israeli Emeritus Professor of History
at Tel Aviv University, wrote
a book called The Invention of the Jewish
People, in which he agrees with a lot of
what Arthur Koestler brought forth
concerning the Khazarian origins of the
so-called Jews. Shlomo Sand, who is
himself a so-called Jew, points out that
the ancestry of most contemporary Jews
stems mainly from outside the Land of
Israel, and they are descended from
converts, and that mass conversions to
Judaism occurred among the Khazars in the
Caucasus, Berber tribes in North Africa,
and in the Himyarite Kingdom of the
Arabian Peninsula. Yeshua said that a
certain people would say they are
Jews but are not, and those people are
the Khazars and their descendants who are
among us today. And the fact that many
sources can be found among these people
which proclaim their true origins is
astounding. On page 226 of his book Sand
writes: Another early source attesting
to the collective conversion of the
Khazars is a Karaite one. In about 973 CE,
one Yaakov Qirqisani, a scholarly
traveler who was quite familiar with the
regions around Khazaria, wrote a
commentary in Aramaic on the verse "Elohim
shall enlarge Japheth" (Gen. 9:27): "This
is what the words mean: he will dwell in
the tents of Shem, which grant him a
favor and advantage. And some
commentators think that
this refers to the Khazars,
who became Jews." What is interesting
about the quote he cites and agrees with
is the fact that they know and believe
the prophecy concerning a people who
would pretend to be of the tribe of
Judah but are truly Gentiles. And they
base this on Genesis 9 verse 27, which
coincides with Revelation 2 verse 9 and 
3 verse 9. What’s more, most of the world
is buying into this deception, and for
the present-day Khazarians, that’s
probably reason to celebrate.
But getting back to Arthur Koestler on
this subject, he writes: The Jews of our
times fall into two main divisions:
Sephardim and Ashkenazim.
The Sephardim are descendants of the Jews
who since antiquity had lived in Spain
until they were expelled at the end of
the fifteenth century and settled in the
countries bordering on the Mediterranean,
the Balkans, and to a lesser extent in
Western Europe. . . . In the 1960s, the number
of Sephardim was estimated at 500,000.
The Ashkenazim, at the same period,
numbered about eleven million.
Thus, in common parlance, Jew is
practically synonymous with Ashkenazi Jew.
It should be mentioned that the
Ashkenaz of the Bible refers to a
people living somewhere in the vicinity
of Mount Ararat and Armenia. The name
occurs in Genesis 10:3 and
I Chronicles 1:6, as one of the sons
of Gomer, who was a son of Japheth.
Ashkenaz is also a brother of Togarmah
(and a nephew of Magog) whom the Khazars,
according to King Joseph, claimed as
their ancestor. But worse was to come.
For Ashkenaz is also named in 
Jeremiah 51:27, where the prophet calls
his people and their allies to rise and
destroy Babylon: "Call thee upon the
kingdoms of Ararat, Minni and Ashkenaz."
This passage was interpreted by the
famous Saadiah Gaon, spiritual leader of
Oriental Jewry in the tenth century, as a
prophecy relating to his own times:
Babylon symbolized the Caliphate of
Baghdad, and the Ashkenaz who were to
attack it were either the Khazars
themselves or some allied tribe. So, as we
have seen from the words of Arthur
Koestler, historically, the Khazars and their
descendants do not identify with Shem . . .
but, rather, they identify with Japheth,
and that is proved out in their own
writings. This is a major fulfillment of
Scripture. All that being said, what
happened to the real people of Judah in
70 A.D. following the siege and
destruction of Jerusalem. The ones who
weren’t captured by the Romans and
killed or enslaved escaped, but where did
they go? First, you have to understand
that whenever trouble arose, such as
severe famine in the land, our forefathers
and mothers were known to migrate in
order to avoid it. There are three famous
accounts of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob
heading south when famine struck at
different periods in each of their
lifetimes. Abraham and Jacob went all the
way south to Egypt, but Isaac went as far
as Gerar. And let’s not forget Joseph
and Mary, who also fled south to Egypt
with Yeshua to escape trouble. These
acts are all somewhat prophetic, as they
are a major clue as to what happened to
the people of Judah following the
destruction of Jerusalem. In his book
From Babylon to Timbuktu, author and
historian Rudolph R. Windsor, a true Hebrew,
writes: In the year 65 B.C. the Roman
armies under General Pompey captured
Jerusalem. In 70 A.D. General Vespasian and
his son, Titus put an end to the Jewish
state with great slaughter. During the
period of the military governors of
Palestine, many outrages and atrocities
were committed against the residue of
the people. During the period from Pompey
to Julius, it has been estimated that
over 1,000,000 Jews fled into Africa,
fleeing from Roman persecution and slavery.
The slave markets were full of
black Jewish slaves. After the fall of
the Carthaginian metropolis in North
Africa, Roman power became dominant in
the Barbery States. . . . The pagans and the
Romans attacked the Jews indiscriminately,
both the Jewish soldiers and the
uninvolved peaceful population. . . . As a
result of this merciless attack, many
Jews fled to those parts of northwest
Africa known as Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco,
and Mauretania. Many other Jews fled to
the areas where Rome did not have any
jurisdiction, this was to the region of
the south, the Sahara Desert and the
Sudan. Windsor also tells us on pages 86
and 87 that more descendants of Judah
fled to the west coast of Africa in the
seventh century after the Visigoths assumed
power and began to suppress Hebrew
customs with forced baptisms to
Christianity. Windsor cites many credible
sources to make his points, among them is
Joseph J. Williams, a twentieth century
historian who, in his 1930 book Hebrewisms
of West Africa, wrote: "Whatever
may be thought of the more or less
mythological traditions connected with
the earliest Jews in North Africa, it is
now practically an established fact that
a Jewish nation -- Jewish at least in faith,
and perhaps too in origin -- long held sway
south of the Sahara."
Now while Joseph Williams, who is
Caucasian and Jesuit, does provide
meaningful and factual info that
pertains to the descendants of the
ancient Hebrew Israelites, he does so with
a degree of reluctance, and the book is
written through the lens of what I would
call a racist and white supremacist
viewpoint. Because, despite all the
evidence of the true descendants of
Judah and Israel as a whole being black,
Williams and his sources try to brush
that aside and conclude that white Jews,
who they blindly claim are the originals,
must have somehow lost their color by
interbreeding with blacks who thereafter
assimilated their culture, for which
there is absolutely no evidence. That 
said, Hebrewisms of West Africa is full
of valuable information as regards the
wanderings of the Hebrews following the
flight from Judea, and it also gives
great insight into the further
scattering of our ancestors, as certain
customs practiced in West Africa by our
Hebrew ancestors found their way to
islands like Jamaica, Haiti, the Virgin
Islands, and many other places following
the slave trade. So, having fled
their homeland
as prophesied, there our ancestors were,
charting new territory in Africa and
trying to carry on their Hebrew
traditions in a new land. But not as
savages, or uncivilized barbarians.
In fact, Rudolph Windsor tells us in his book:
The black Jews had an advantage over the
African tribes: they carried their 
culture, history, laws, and written records
with them; this assured them a constant
precedent for the development of a
higher social organization. Because of
the stability of the black Jewish culture,
the Jews were not absorbed into
the autochthonous, or native, population.
In fact, the Jews absorbed some of the
native tribes. The Jews made use of every
opportunity; they were an industrious and 
skillful people: In the Jewish Ghanaian
states were found kings, princes,
governors, generals, secretaries,
treasurers, revenue agents, judges,
architects, engineers, doctors, jewelers,
sculptors, masons, carpenters, painters of art, 
goldsmiths, leather-workers,
potters, armorers,
saddlers, blacksmiths, agriculturists, etc.
The survivors of the Roman siege of
Jerusalem were able to flee that terror
and carry on in a new land. But the
relative peace our ancestors were
afforded by escaping to Africa was
broken by the Arab Slave Trade, which
affected not only Hebrews, but men, women,
and children from many other peoples that
were usually of the lowest classes.
The eastern Arab slave trade, in particular
involved women and young girls, and a
strict ratio of two women for each man
was maintained. The Arab Slave Trade, as
horrible as it was, eventually gave way
to something much worse with the arrival
of the Portuguese. Portugal broke
from Arab rule somewhere
between the 12th and 13th centuries and
slowly rose to power. Because of this
small European country, slavery would
soon go from including people of lower
classes from different ethnicities, to
being forced mainly on so-called blacks,
from the tribe of Judah. In the early
fifteenth century, Portuguese shipbuilding in
Lisbon and Porto adapted to the times
and the result was the caravel, a light and
fast aerodynamic vessel that allowed
Portuguese mariners to travel south
along Africa’s Atlantic coast in order
to reach the gold-producing regions of
sub-Saharan West Africa. After
establishing several trading posts and
colonies in the region, other markets
began to open up, such as the lucrative
commerce in India, and overseas expansion
resulted from Portugal’s many trade
networks. The Portuguese became heavily
active in slave trading in Africa around
1445, after they discovered the Cape
Verde islands and settled there.
Slavery was used to fuel their expanding
empire, and slave trafficking became
integral to their enterprise. When it
became apparent that slavery was big
business, a law had to be created to
protect it, thus, the sitting Pope, Pope
Nicholas the Fifth, issued a papal bull, the
strongest command of a pope, titled
Romanus Pontifex, Latin for the Roman
Pontiff. He issued the bull to King
Alfonso the Fifth of Portugal on January 8,
1455, and it allowed the king to [and I
quote] ". . . invade, search out, capture, vanquish,
and subdue all Saracens and pagans
whatsoever, and other enemies of Christ
wheresoever placed, and the kingdoms,
dukedoms, principalities, dominions,
possessions, and all movable and
immovable goods whatsoever held and
possessed by them and to reduce their
persons to perpetual slavery."
This was basically a license and go-
ahead for King Alfonso, who alone was
personally named in the papal bull, to
send vessels to search out, capture,
vanquish, subdue, and enslave Hebrews,
particularly the people of Judah, whose
existence, kingdom, and territory they
were well aware of. The people of Judah
were their primary concern in fact, and
they are the so-called Negroes who were
rounded up and scattered throughout the
four corners of the earth, just as Yeshua
said they would be, back in Luke 21
verse 24. They will be killed by the
sword or sent away as captives to all
the nations of the world. . . . And this also
coincides with the curse of Deuteronomy
28 verse 64: For Yah will scatter you among
all the nations from one end of the
earth to the other. When I say they were
aware of who Judah was, I’m not
conjecturing. Proof is in the record.
If you do a Google search and type in A New
and Accurate Map of Negroland,
a list of results will pop up.
As of the date of this recording, Swaen.com
still works. Click on it and a page
will open up showing a 1747 map of West
Africa, by eighteenth-century English map
engraver Emmanuel Bowen,
and then click on the
image of the map itself. Move your mouse
pointer to the area that is now
present-day Ghana and click on it to
enlarge the map. Click it again, and
you’ll clearly see that what is now
called Ghana was once the Slave Coast,
which the mapmaker labeled, The Kingdom
of Juda, dropping the "H" at the end. This is 
where many of the people of Judah
were shipped from, like sardines in a can.
Yet today, the elites and their paid
professors would have you believe that
we are Africans or Hamites, when in
truth, we are Shemites. They themselves
know this to be a fact. In Zondervan’s
Compact Bible Dictionary for instance,
the definition for Ham reads as follows:
Ham -- The youngest son of Noah, born
probably about 96 years before the Flood;
and one of eight persons to live through the
Flood. He became the progenitor of the
dark races; not the Negroes, but the
Egyptians, Ethiopians, Libyans and
Canaanites. They say not the Negroes
because Shem is the progenitor or father
of the Negroes. Though both lines are
comprised of so-called blacks, Africans
and so-called African-Americans are not 
the same. We are Hebrews and they are
Hamites. But there are still many Hebrews
in Africa, however. But getting back to
our history, despite the papal bull
pertaining solely to the king of
Portugal, that didn’t stop other empires
and nations from
getting in on the action.
Over the centuries, Spain, Britain, France,
the Dutch, Canada, the United States, and
many African countries participated in a
transatlantic slave trade and this
fulfilled certain prophecies, such as
Psalm 83, which I urge you to read with
your eyes open, and Joel 3 verse 6:
You have sold the people of Judah and
Jerusalem to the Greeks, so they could
take them far from their homeland. The
sad fact is, Psalm 83 is
still in full effect,
as our collective enemies are still
conspiring to keep us in the dark as
concerns our true identity, and they
continue to miseducate to us. They really
mean to wipe out the memory of the
true people of Israel from the face of the
earth, but Yah is not going to let that
happen. And this documentary is merely
one step toward that effort. The present
situation we are in is solely due to our
forefathers failing to keep the covenant
law of Yah, and it falls to us in
this generation to right that wrong, and
Yah said that this would happen in
our day: " 'But I will spare some, for some
of you will escape the sword when you
are scattered among the
lands and nations. Then in
the nations where they have been carried
captive, those who escape will remember
me -- how I have been grieved by their
adulterous hearts, which have turned away
from me, and by their eyes, which have
lusted after their idols. They will
loathe themselves for the evil they have
done and for all their detestable
practices. And they will know that I am
Yah; I did not threaten in vain to bring
this calamity on them.' " You see,
we, the people of Israel are not
born deserving of that name. We are born
as Jacobs, or supplanters and schemers,
but to truly earn the right to be called
Israel, we, like our father Jacob will
have to be faithful and wrestle with
Yah until we are overcomers. Those of 
us who do this will be the ones who will
truly be called Israel and form the
remnant of the Kingdom. Having said that,
please don’t let this be the end of your
search for truth on this subject.
Continue to dig for it and pray that Yah
gives you discernment since a great deal
of deception is out there regarding this
topic. And spread the word to your
friends and family, and he or she that
has ears to hear and eyes to see among
them will get it. I hope that this brief
history has enlightened you and brought
a degree of understanding as concerns
our past, which goes well beyond Africa.
The so-called Negros, blacks, and
African Americans are actually the
descendants of the people of Judah, and
that is something they
don't want us to know.
[Closed Captioning by Kingdom Preppers]
