'Learn How to Fly' Association
presents
The Ecology of Information
Module 6
A very interesting short film
a presentation made at a scientific conference
in which the way the human body develops is shown
piece by piece, organ by organ
Let's watch it for a few minutes
It's in French
Where does the interesting part appear?
It starts to appear
the moment the embyo develops through swirls
The swirls move the cells from one place to another
Let's watch a bit more, so that we can look at things in greater depth
Although the scientist talks a lot,
pictures have been taken and films have been made of the process
And here is the working model - swirls of cells appear which move them from place to another
and give form to the organs and the body during embryogenesis
Special films were made so that we can see the process
Rotation appears
Appart from this rotation, another interesting this is
the model of cell aggregation
which rotate within well defined organs
which develop in stages
This shows that the rotation is not random or by chance
The cells arrange themselves in a certain shape, due to the information they carry
they recognise eachother
It's an amazing model
At the moment, the movement is flat
at one point the movement becomes spatial
You can watch this film later on, it's included in the course's references
We spoke during the other courses about vortices
The isomorphism theory of the algebraic fractals says that
what has happened before will happen again
the vortices will occur again during embyogenesis
And here we see the vortices which form the upper and lower part of the body [see screen]
here is the middle of the body
in the 20th day
The thorax is here and the basin is here
The asymmetries appear
And then we have the large and small brains
So it's clear and evident that there are 'softwares' and information that maneuvers everything
At that moment, the consitency of the embryo is similar to that of the egg white
So all these vortices form naturally/normally
All the foldings and everything else are formed out of vortices
Why did I want to show you this?
There is also a book by Vincent Fleury - 'Les tourbillons de la vie'
- the scientist in the film we just watched
facts observable with the electronic microscope
It's very interesting because one of the first studies ever on algebraic fractals, that I wrote
started from very basic things
At one point, in this study,
I made an observation regarding the cycles, which are neither linear, nor hexagonal or triangular
as we now know the diagrams from the past lessons
They are circular
This shows us they can be connected with geometric transformations
Because each of these F2, F5, F4 and so on...
are in fact mathematical formulas
and you can obtain geometrical transformations
On the other hand, if we go here,
we'll find certain valances and arcs that tell me what goes with what
and from time to time generate the other one
Chemically speaking
the moment we take, for instance, a porphyrin
let's say, chlorophyll,
It is a porphyrin with a very interesting structure
Something like this
only it's not complete here
There is a protein perpendicular on the porphyrin's plane
which takes the  ray of light
- here we see it better -
which takes the light's energy to the Magnesium atom
which produces a leap of the electrons from the Nitrogen atoms
which determines a change in the porhyrin's plane
This change is transmitted to the outer chains which change into enzymes
They don't have the initial shape, they shrink
My porphyrin is no longer a flat shape, it becomes spatial
Thinking about things at this level, we find that,
for each of these feedbacks
I get rotation of 60, 120 degrees, inversions, symmetries, identical...
these are geometric transformations
I didn't go further with this study, I had to look into other things,
but if I link this study with
the film you just saw, we find very interesting things
Because I have the link with algebraic fractals and the information they transmit
and the shapes they create
Because, from the very beginning,
we have many valences - the ones related to the links within the cycles, and also in the arcs
which creates an alphabet of changes and transformations
which we can now follow
This creates an interesting link between algebraic frcatals
and Bejan's constructal
which was wondering how to build a universe starting from some basic elements
...the pelvic rolling...
We have, for instance, the upper part
arranged differently as the lower part of our bodies
It is obvious that the lower part, the pelvis, has suffered a rotation
so that the 'legs' shoulders' have become buttocks
This is an example
of vortices
So the body's shape has a totally logical shape that is related to certain genetically inscribed programs
Here we have a filmed and interpreted result which corresponds to the very basis - zero level
given by the versatility of these feedbacks
They can manifest themselves as hexagonal structures, cycles, linear structures...
and each time we look at them, we get something else
We obtain a different view of the universe - it's exteremly complex
But regardless of the instrument I choose, I can understand something
and that 'something' is not difficult to use for Nature, because it's game with a finite number of elements
A huge number of elements, it's true, but finite nonetheless
The issue currently at hand
is related to the 'software'
For human beings, the 'software' is integrated in the DNA
DNA has an incredibly complex structure, but, be careful-
it can be read linearly
when you unravel DNA like a string
and then you have all the DNA bases lined up in a row
You can also read DNA on the spirals it has within the genes
And you can also read it as a 4 level protein
on more complex matters
Let's have a look
Let's suppose we are in such a situation
This is what it would look like if we read DNA nucleotide by nucleotide
Actually, it's not DNA, it's on the next level, the aminoacids
which form the basis of proteins
DNA is behind this, there is an extra structure
After which we have the Alpha helix
which pertains to DNA
After which we have helixes which form bands
the tertiary structure
And then we have very complex texts
in which we have the commands and the places they send information
I started this analysis because,
the reason is very simple -
the mathematical model
explains the coherent information space, explains how the information comes,
but it doesn't explain how the information aggegates to form large objects
What I started back then must be continued
taking every piece and studying the geometric transformations - it's a mathematician's job
At one point, there probably be mathematicians
which will use computers to study the process and to also generate images
Then the confirmation will be absolute, that our universe is not only linear,
but also formed on the principles of the algebraic fractals, the universe of communications
life is permanent communication
So, information
Taking into account that 97-98 % of our  DNA deals with the synthesis/production of information,
you only saw the pale reflex
over what spatial representation within an extraordinarily complex aggregate means
And, take a good look,
at the holes within the sacrum -
- they are not punctured by a needle, they are included in the initial project
And bit by bit, piece by piece,
growth and development are included in the initial project/model
How complex it is!
Because here, for instance [lower right quarter]
the initial form doesn't look anything like the final one
but it is contained in the bud
As the respective information unfolds,
the incredible complexity of the brain - as we see here, for example - appears
This leads us to a great dilemma
There clearly is a huge intelligence involved, beyond any possible estimates,
for something to grow in this manner
Is it an exterior intelligence, or is it intrinsic?
Algebraic fractals say that it's an intrinsic intelligence
that develops
This is important, because this intrinsic intelligence
generated the universe we have
which is not random
and it also generated intelligent life,
which means that the informational complexity resides in this universe's softwares
So life is universal, and the universe is intelligent
These are not local happenings
It's not probability theory
It's something totally improbable, impossible, but it exists
The spine
If you watch the film and listen to the explanations, everything is a lived experience
but without understanding from where it comes from
In order to understand where all this comes from, you have to back to the algebraic fractals,
to the basics of algebraic fractals, in which those geometric transformations
which become 3D
At level 0 they are very small, but at the second level they become very complex,
and contain vortices within vortices
there are a lot of transformations going on, and all this is within a self-unfolding project
Then you can realise that John the Apostle was right when he said 'In the beginning there was the Word'
There is a Plan
This Plan is very hard to undarstand because we were taught to think linearly
And so, even if we watch the film and see the swirls and vortices,
we don't understand why they occur
What's the basis for all those vortices?
From where does the vortex come from?
That's the issue
How can the swirl/vortex manifest itself in the formation of the embryo?
It's a very unattractive math, because it's impossible
It can only be done with the help of computer software
It doesn't fit in with the normal/regular calculus formulas, it is constructive
and self-generating - it keeps comming up with things
...probably the mathematics of the future
It's important to understand that this is how the human embryo developed, and how the ecosystem developed
It's important to understand, that if a certain piece of information is missing here,
there'll be a congenital malformation
'Poof!' the 3 dimensional part appears
it folds
Another transformation has come in play
The fact that it happened in time, that there were accumulations
means that there was clearly a choice between the packages of information that were built
within the types of algebraic fractals
and which are in accordance with the environment in which the respective being develops
It means there is a close and strong match between the environment's information and the initial program
But it also means something else
It means that if the information does not exist
the outcome will be monstruous
And why are we so careful and walking on tiptoe....
...because species have started to die
And because we use all sorts of chemicals and large molecules and so on,
without thinking in terms of what information they transmit
within an amazingly complex informational system
Why? Because we are childish. We probably won't be childish for long
because, as you can see, things are unfolding in such a manner nowadays,
and they force us to becoome open-minded
and understand things in their entire complexity - there is no other way, they are compex
There is another interesting thing
the fundamental theory of algebraic fractals concerning the structural isomorphism
says that what happens in the embryo
also happens in a larger embryo
For instance, we are now in a society which has exhausted the local resources and has to globalise
in order to use the remaining resources in a coordinated manner
so that they are not totally exhausted
For this to happen, there must be a lot of softwares
to give coherence,
tolerance and validity to all the movements and vortices that occur
If we understand the necessity of certain vortices,
they occur normally
...also in the process of generating organs, there are areas which appear, develop, and then disappear...
...for instance, the structure of the kidney which develops up until the 7th month of pregnancy
...there are a lot of structures, out of which only a few remain to form the final kidney
while the others degenerate and disappear
They did their job for a certain amount of time in which the embryo needed to eliminate certain toxins
When it learned how to optimise things, the respective structures were no longer useful and disppeared
We can now make predictions
We are a relatively intelligent species
not as intelligent as the environment, which is far superior,
not as intelligent as the universe which is infintely more intelligent
but we are relatively intelligent - we are starting to understand certain things
But now we are making efforts to get rid of this burden of intelligence, to pass it on to artificial intelligence
to develop AI
..to develop softwares that develop softwares, to build compuers which build computers
lanuages that create other languages.....to optimise....this is what we are doing nowadays
...to get rid of the burden of intelligence
(we'll get rid of it, but the price to pay will be to measure)
The price will be in accordance, because we will become useless, just like those pieces of kidney
(on the other hand, there is no other way, there's not much we can do about it)
(there are huge amounts of data to be processed)
That's just it - in order to process data, we need to develop our intelligence
At the same time with developing AI, which is useful,
we need to develop our own intelligence
because otherwise it will take our place and we will disappear - it's simple
it's not that hard to understand
The patterns repeat themselves
Everything is non-linear
There are internal laws that we do not know
which are in fact in the structure of the information that circulates
within an environment which is built with its own information
So it's very very interesting, but also very very difficult
These tertiary structures also show us that the beginnings were of a universe that is learning
and then it builds itself
So I didn't finish this paper, it was no longer of interest to me at that time
but work on it can be continued starting from these initial trials of characterising the universe
You have seen this before - when we talked about lattice automata
There was also in that case an interesting and clear thing...
if these 'faces' of the cube are formed of the same type of feedbacks [see screen]
(these numbers are feedbacks of the same type, both horizontally and vertically)
then the feedbacks from the other 'faces' of the cube have to be of a different class/type
in order to have consistency, otherwise, any fault/error is bounced around
I wrote these in 2000, a long time ago....
...how they are connected...there is a math behind all this, which I didn't explore further...
...although, as you can see, there's a lot of work put into this material....
But now I find that other teams have started to take these things further,
for instance, the people at Quantum Gravity who work with polytopes
...the idea is continued somewhere
The great problem/issue is that we don't know what we are doing
Not knowing what we are doing,
there are cycles for our elimination
This idea - expanded in this article by Andrei Plesu - comes from the ancient Vedas
(artificial intelligence cannot prosper in time)
Neither can the human species in time, if it doesn't change it's parameters,
because it can't handle things any more
...it's beyond normal possibilities/capacities
And now, our great problem is
given by the lack of the capability of understanding
of concrete actions
Russia says that it's not their Mayak nuclear facility
that caused the radioactive clouds/contamination in Europe this year
Ruthenium 106 is the radioactive isotope in question
Of course, the authorities didn't mention anything about this
However, Ruthenium has it's own information
It's not at all 'harmless'
When you introduce a new informational element within a structure of huge complexity like the environment,
problems appear automatically
This article appeared in The Guardian
On the other hand...we have a serious task on our hands...
...because
we are now creating artificial minds
'It's difficult, I can't'
Before, it wasn't a question of 'difficult - I can't'....
...but rather issues of spirituality, open mindedness, or at least common sense
There were certain directions in which
a connection/fine tuning between humanity and reality could be made
Humanity's great problem now, is that
this connection/fine tuning doesn't happen any more
This is also a very interesting paper
Nowadays, we never pursue things up to the analysis of the consequences
We do not analyse the consequences
Our manner of thinking related to consequences
should have taken us
to a different manner of thinking - not the linear one of today
We currently think in business terms
'to have or not to have profit'
We don't even think at the level of the multidimensional scale, in which
if you press on one arm, the rest falls into imbalance
And this is costing us now
The one who designed and built that nuclear plant
...Ruthenium does not exist in nature - it's artificially made.....
never thought of the consequences
In order to think about the consequences, one must first understand the existence of (a) certain information,
and not necessarily the understanding of what each information from this life actually means
That's extremely difficult
But at least to know that there is information that coordinates the world, society,
the ecosystem, the human body, etc.
(how could artificial intelligence intergrate in this ecosystem?)
It's a very good question, because
we are now
on a trend in which
we don't even know what 'intelligence' means
But we can see what inteligent behaviour means
This is what is understood by 'intelligence'
...a definition
...on domains
...and specific skills
This perspective is from a noteworthy paper
But the author make no link whatsoever
with the huge natural intelligence an organism has in its own development
It's clumsy attempt
And we live clumsily in this respect
We're not able to comprehend but a mere 'A B C'
But even this 'A B C' is important
He's starting to think now in terms of connectivity
He's thinking
..the flexibility of the network...
But, again, they are timid 'A B C' attempts
It's good, so far
that at least, bit by bit,
information has started to appear in this area
...the dynamic network and general intelligence...
but we are still bound to the 20th centry
in which there was no accepted integrative vision, everything was reductionist
So if you wanted to find the Holy Grail
that gave you everlasting youth, or intelligence, or something else,
it wasn't about understanding, it was about consumption - the century of consumersim
(this article is based on Spearman's IntelligenceTheory in which....)
(he noticed that certain people which had high intelligence in performing a certain task)
(manage to perform a different type of task with the same level of intelligence)
(i.e. if you can perform in a certain direction, you can also perform in another, totally unrelated direction)
(and with this constructivist anthropometric index)
(he tried to define a general intelligence)
(this is the idea behind this theory)
(but later on, it was concluded that it's not enough studying a general type of intelligence, )
(because man has many types of intelligence)
(and later on they came to define a 'crystalised' intelligence)
(i.e. the experience up to that point, what one has managed to accumulate)
(and the way in which the brain structures change)
(according to certain temporal variables present)
(which they named 'flexible intelligence')
(and they saw that, with age, very few people mantain their flexibility)
(and the manner in which the inter-connections with the already 'crystalised' intelligence change and are made)
Actually this happens not because of our initial structure, but because of society
which aggregates itself on structures which are not very flexible
This was possible up to this century, but from now on, it doesn't work this way any more
Proof of this is the fact that 40% of the old jobs have disappeared,
over the next 20 years 80% of the present jobs will disappear too...
We have entered an era of very rapid dynamics
in which the minds that have crystalised certain things don't understand anything any more
because everything that was not used, has been lost
(I'd like to say something about artificial intelligence)
(the problem will be that AI will have no morality issues, as opposed to human intelligence)
(it doesn't possess the concept, so therefore it can't have issues related to it, because it doesn't understand it)
(we can look at the Nazi's example of an intelligence lacking morals)
(for instance, why would AI keep alive certain children with 'deficiencies')
(that would use up resources?)
(why would AI maintain a world population of 7 billion,)
(when the optimum number would be 2-3 billion, let's say?)
(there are a lot of aspects that pertain strictly to rational decisions, )
(that are taking us into a direction which will negatively affect all of us in the end)
We are already paying the price
In Belgium, for instance, euthanasia of terminally ill or incurable patients is legal
So the incurable patient in hospital
receives a lethal injection
and is helped to 'disappear' because he is a burden
Unfortunately, children are not exempt either
if a child is born, for instance, with brain cancer, it gets the injection and 'good-bye'
(the issue here is the definition of morality)
(reality is in accordance to the intial design)
(if AI is born from a certain 'construction' project)
(if the 'designer' is faulty, then things can get out of control and deviate from our 'initial' design)
It already is out of control
We are currently running a permanent risk of a financial catastrophe
because all the financial networks and intra-networks of the big banks
have AI that continuously runs programs to generate speculative capital -
they are no longer linked to the economy -
they just have to make more money, earn more capital -
the banks' initial role has been forgotten
And then these AI programs develop their own 'languages' and communicate among themselves,
no human can understand what's happening,
and if, at one point, the AI's get an idea and  want to do something logical from their point of view,
then the whole financial system of the world could collapse
The whole financial world is playing Russian Roulette
because they don't know what will happen
it's out of control
But during the previous courses I showed you what the feedback and information  portfolios look like -
- they look the same, but have different nuances inside
and any choice is in fact a decision
The respective decisions can be biological
and then the vortices appear
and te dynamics
At every level, these are internal decisions
Look - another decision
Another decision was made, different to what we are used to, and these cyclops appeared
So the problem is that we can create monsters
if we don't conserve and keep our own balance
If we develop spirituality and the understanding of this universe in its complexity
not in the primitive and simplistic concept,
for instance 'the American dream' type
- you close a couple of 'good deals' and end up on top, and are rich for the rest of your life
The ecology of information has to do with
this extraordinary complexity and dynamics
It's not at all simple
It's extremely complex
and it's a great challenge
because if humanity starts to understand and changes its manner of thinking
...it understands this metabolism of information
..it's very difficult
You alreay know, because you are going through this during this course - it's not easy
To understand all this is very hard
But
In Christ's time, He said - 'don't worry about it - believe, do not doubt!'
We can't not 'doubt' things nowadys, we have to explore and research things
because otherwise, your faith will not redeem you - the situation is too complicated
(I beg to differ: 'seek and you shall find', 'ask and you shall be given', 'knock and it will open')
(it doesn't say anywhere in the Bible that you should have blind faith, without doubt)
That's comforting
(on the contrary, the Bible tells you to seek, to explore, to want to know)
I have great admiration for Christ and the Apostles - they did a good job
But the problem is extremely interesting
We can now make fatal decisions
like the one with the nuclear power plant and the Ruthenium
We don't know what consequences Ruthenium will have on the next generation of children
maybe they'll be cyclops
So this area is one that needs to be researched in great detail
So now we've gotten into conception - it's very intersting but also very complex
It's not only about our physical conception
we are conceiving ouservles permanently from the personality point of view
Because all this information, at each age/stage of development,
is genetically inscribed information which unfolds
according to a calendar
And, again, we have to mention
religious texts
some magnificent quotes
'many have been called upon, few are chosen'
Unfortunately we can't transmit enough information
so that the complexity reaches the level of simplicity of certain peoples' minds
so that they develpo their perception of common sense and stop attacking
With regards to intelligence, whether we like it or not, we are put in this situation
because....
we have....
..how information supports different areas of the brain...
... the general architcture of interactions ...
...it's very interesting...
...crystalised and fluid intelligence...
...how we adapt the old information...
But just think that we are born with these capabilities available to us
So the initial design
gives us so many fantastic possibilities which exist in the initial 'software program'
that unfold one by one -
- from those vortices into other types of vortices
These vortices are no longer cellular - they are on neural networks
that form
(so this would mean that AI is not part of such a metabolism)
It's one of the decisions
And if you look at the problem - which is not new -
...for instance the 10 Commandments - don't steal, don't kill...don't be lazy...
...Keynes' Laws which say that man is a species which tries to maximise his profit with minimal effort
...this is a decision
The moment man wants to maximise profit and reduce the effort
he no longer respects the laws of nature,
he depends on the structures that allow him to speculate
and we are now living the consequences
We are faced with profound crises which emerged due to Keynesian economics
and we challenge the 10 Commandments - don't lie, don't steal, don't kill... -
...just look at Hollywood's output - which are the blockbusters?
So-called 'action movies', right?
...in which they lie, steal and kill...
They break the10 Commandments
There's a vortex there too
Obviously, Nature has its own vortices
We are now in position, but it can put us in a totally different position, minimising us or not
I'll give you an example
At the time when America was the realm of knives, guns and cowboys
there were a lot of horses
and sparrows multiplied a lot, because a few colonists brought some to remind them of home
The sparrows were so many, that the wheat crops were jeopardised
Half the crops were lost to sparrows, because they multiplied due to the abundance of food
After the Ford cars appeared
and their use became widespread, the horses disappeared
Noone needed horse anymore as a means of transport because petrol was cheap
and one could travel faster and more safely
The sparrows also disappeared
because they had a lot of food in the horse dung
So these are big movements
- a species which develops greatly, or which disappears the moment it is no longer needed
It's no longer needed
So if we don't manage to develop the natural intelligence
at the same time as artificial intelligence, and continue to abide by Keynes' laws,
we'll have the same fate as the sparrows without the horses, and disappear
This is obvious
We no longer have meaning/purpose
And we'll no consume that much food senselessly,
we'll be giving the ecosystem a break
We are eliminating ourselves
There will be massve unemployment in the next 20 years
because 80% of jobs/profesions will disappear, and new ones will have to appear
Wh jobs will remain?
(maybe currencies will also disappear)
Currencies might disappear...this is not the basic issue
(someone once said that we are the only species that has to pay to live)
(and we asume we are the most intelligent one...)
These are fundamenal questions, and now we have to get used to the fact that they exist
and cannot be ignored
But people must take care of people
This is the only possible way out
And we'll take just one example
'Present-future' model
and I'll pick some random numbers/nodes
52 and 19
Next time we'll start using this software model
but until now I wanted you to see what the shapes are all about
because we have a shape/form
...and I'll choose one of the paths to get from one point/number to the other
[see screen]
How do we get from 'Gross National Happiness (GNH)' to 'redefining weath'?
GNH says you are happy when you have nice neighbours,
the boss is lenient, the environment is clean, schools are good, there is health, etc.
How do you get there? You need a job for that
A job that teaches people what well-being means
Because if one is happy because he has 20 wives, or 70 camels
and believes he has well-being/is wealthy because of this
it's very hard to convince him otherwise
What about 'redifining wealth' to 'changing the thinking paradigm'?
Who ensures this passage/transition?
It's another job
And to transition from 'changing the paradigm' to 'modesty and altruism'
who helps you?
It's another job
The same for 'modesty, altruism' to 'restoring the natural balance'
you need another job - that's the technique
But you have to pass through some stages
So you have 'the recovery of the natural balance' and get to 'open-source sharing of innovative solutions'
Who does that? Another job
You see, this is very interesting, because we develop jobs/professions
with humans taking care of humans, and humans taking care of nature
We won't be out of jobs - we'll be out of 'handling/manual' jobs
Those jobs will be taken over by robots, nanotechnology...
but the professional environment continues to exist
Whatever path I choose within this model
...this [red] node refers to the technological leap...
and over here I have other jobs
(because there will be other needs)
(which consquently dictate what professions should emerge)
This is also the basis for the professional network
Now you realise, that, even in the case of the body
- in order to take a number of cells through a transformation
in a certain area
is in fact a job
It's a type of change within the general framework,
within the general informational architecture of a developing system
in which there are all sorts of specialised units for the tasks
That is why we have enzymes, hormones
That is why we have systems for transmitting information everywhere
These are jobs
Starting today -
after we saw that there are some internal changes
which we must understand
that they are inevitable
in order to find a framework
in which we can continue to live together on Earth without destroying it
...because our tendency is to destroy it out of ignorance
- we'll continue with practical applications
We have come to this point
But it's essential
And I'm very glad I found this short film
because it's remarcably clear
'Different causes that produce the same effect'
Do you remeber the bunches of feedbacks that looked the same
and did the same thing from the effect's point of view,
but in fact it was the causes that produced things?
So, in the end,
it's a matter of decision
We have to learn to be wise in order to make wise decisions
We can't do this within a pyramid system that imposes things
We can do this within a debate system based on networks
Let's take a break
You go first
(From where does the child's intelligence come from? The mother? The father?)
It's a very good question, because we don't have just the mother's and father's intelligence,
as we saw, we also have the society's intelligence, that of the natural environment,
which also have some extraordinary regulatory mechanisms,
we also have cosmic intelligence...going up to the intelligence of bacteria which has been recently studied
and which shows that there is a direct relationship between epidemics
and the state of human consciousness at the moment of outbreak
Taking into account that one third of our weight is bacteria -
- we have 10 times more bacteria than our own cells -
we can easily make a connection between our mood, stress, state of negativity
and our poor health
Which means that the bacteria are working alongside us
to rebalance us or eliminate us from the system
And then,
let's think this way:
the act of conception -
mother and father exchange sex cells (gametes)
They live in a paradoxical state -
that moment is nothing like brushing your teeth
It lasts for a few moments
The paradoxical state is given by a certain formula
with differentiated weights of alpha, beta, gamma, delta, theta biorythms
which represent a message related to nature,
another related to the collective subconscious,
another message related even to the planets,
and to bacteria, for instance,
and other types of intelligent entities
And then,
what does society do - it gives the child a destiny/fate
because the child will be a cell within a global organism
and when it is born it has certain abilities and talents
which it can develop or not
It's not 1 to 1 - you saw that anything has a number of causes,
and any state can produce a number of effects
so it's a matter of possible/potential paths
The planets' frequencies directly affect the genome
- we saw in Poponin's experiment how sensitive DNA is to weak, not high intensity frequencies -
Any kind of frequency, including that of the crickets' 'song' in the fields
adds on components to what is the first stage of designing the phoetus
There's not just the mother-father mix
The way the DNA wraps itself ....
..meiosis, metosis and the other processes refer to how it is aggregated...
but the manner in which the DNA wraps itself give the valences of subsequent expression
The child then grows intelligent or not in accordance to the environment
which provides certian information of one type or another
If the information blocks, then the child doesn't grow well, it grows without  intelligence,
if the information doesn't block, then the intelligence will grow/develop
The same happens to adults
So it's not just mother and father, there are many components that work at/on the level of intelligence
For instance, now,
we are living in a period in which intelligence is statistically measured
The average IQ
was rising in 2000 by 0.02%
for the population with average intelligence,
and was rising by 3%
for the highly intelligent population
for the gifted children..in the year 2000
At present,
around 16% of the children aged between 16 and 18
have a high level of skills
their IQ is in the upper bracket
on all the tests
(what determined this leap?)
The system's need to continue to have intelligent people
because stupidity is risky
As you saw with the Ruthenium - absurd decisions are risky
(is it possible that it was there before, but was not identified?)
No
Ruthenium is not found in nature
It's obtained with fusion reactions
(is there a relationship between the quantity and quality of information generated )
(and the development needs of the comming generations?)
There is a need, and we can easily see this
All the 'deviations' from the statistical norm regarding the children's intelligence
show a massive increase in autism
Autistic people have incredible calculus capacities,
abilities to identify objects, and to communicate with nature
not with people
The fact that these types of generations have appeared,
which is in correlation with the destruction of forests, and the degradation of nature,
shows that these children are in fact a populational self-regulating mechanism
by which the Earth is creating somehow generations of people who will save the circuits destroyed by others
This doesn't happen in a matter of days, it's a matter of generations
Other studies carried out on the French Revolution
show that
70% of the current French population
have ancestors from 30% of the people who lived during the time of the Revolution
The other 70% from that time didn't have enough descendants to be representative nowadays
So this is a mechanism of genetic selection
which is clearly generated by a certain type of information
unfolding its program
Questions please
(what implications upon intelligence could the change in the Schumann Resonance have?)
First of all, the immediate implications
are related to changes in our own frequencies - alpha, beta, gamma, delta, theta
(is it linked to hyperactivity?)
For now, it can be linked to anything
And it's not just 1 link, there's a bunch of links
Further on, as I told you, there is a path that is chosen by the person, species...whatever,
there is a negotiation - some make it, others disappear
It's a choice of paths,
just like in the French Revolution:
those that chose another road than that which took them to enhance their ability to survive and
attain a level of well-being, disappeared
It's an adaptation process
The respective information remains as a potential,
the population that chooses/represents other paths/choices never disappears
but at a certain point, there will be a more numerous population of a certain type
because it will have a better nurturing environment
it will be more adapted to a social environment
It's fascinating that there are bacteria in nuclear reactors
where there are huge levels of radiation
1 million times higher than outside the reactor
The respective bacteria have adapted to that environment
and proliferate
There's no competition
Or how flamingo live in the lakes with caustic soda (sodium hydroxide)
produced by volcanoes
(we create the social environment, it's not a given thing from somewhere else)
(adaptation to a social environment created or developed by others by imposing a certain direction )
(I don't think has much to do with intelligence, but more to do with cowardice)
(for example, when the Bolshevics came into our country, many 'adapted', i.e. gave in out of cowardice)
(the ones that did not give in/'adapt' were, as you, say eliminated - hunted and killed in the mountains)
(and I can't say that those who adapted to Bolshevism were an example of intelligence)
(but an example of cowardice, harnessing their primitive survival instincts, not their intelligence)
(so if we just adapt to the social environment instead of modelling and changing it)
(I don't think we enhance our intelligence - this is my opinion)
You are right, and you are also wrong, because we don't have only 1 type of intelligence
We even have lots of nuances in our vocabulary, ranging from 'cunning' to 'wise'
The sly and cunning person is able to survive because he is flexible
(he 'agrees' with 'them' and does what he wants)
Yes
He is flexible - it's primitive form of adaptive intelligence
It's obvious
But between 'clever' which is visionary
and 'wise' there are huge differences of scale/range
The problem is that society, as it is currently formed,
has many layers
I can't compare the guy who cleans up the garbage
and has a beer after work, if he's got money,
with von Neumann who is in a different class of intelligence
It's obvious these two aren't in the same class of intelligence
From the intelligence point of view, I can't deny the fact that
half of the people with a high IQ do not perform on the market
because they can't adapt to it. The cunning guy manages to adapt to the market
You can find people with an IQ of 200 that are taxi drivers
They can't adapt and are unsuccessful in life
There is no corelation between their measurable intelligence and what they do in life
None whatsoever
And it's paradoxical, bcause IQ measurements were made for winners of the Nobel Prize
and many had a low IQ, but they worked hard for just one idea,
and they were lucky that respective idea was correct
but they didn't fit in to the 'high IQ' category
(I still can't see the link with adaptation to society)
There is a dynamic here
in which sometimes you have to change society, sometimes you have to adapt, etc.
And you can see waves that occur at social level due to the collective subconscious
that sometimes reacts by amplifying things
From collective hysteria which led to wars,
to collective consciousness actions
which led to the solving of certain crises
(sorry, as you know, I'm 'the black sheep' of the group...)
(but concerning mass hysteria...I don't know....the second World War would not have happened)
(if the Nazi regime hadn't have received massive financial and material support from the UK, the USA)
(i.e. it was not collective/public hysteria that led to WW2)
No, it was the collective hysteria of the leaders
at the public level everything was peacful
the collective hysteria was on another layer
(doesn't anyone want to say anything about feminine energy?)
(what feminine energy?)
OK, let's analyse this issue a little because it's interesting
What George is saying is correct
but, again, it's about different layers
If I have a package of information from an algebraic fractal from the 200 order
which is extraordinarily complex
and I loose the abilities given by the algebraic fractal form the 1 order
which can do only 1 thing, but it does it fast and very well
When the fractal is big, it has many options and has to think a lot
...a direct case related to the human brain...
We have a small and primitive brain
which is very fast - the amygdala
which is the first to react to danger
If the electric impuls from the neurons
lasts, let's say, 3 milliseconds
from eye to brain to hand
in order to do something
...in the case of the rain
When the impulse gets to the amygdala
the action is instant
The amygdala is a very simple structure in comparison to the brain which is a very complex one
'Fight or flight' is very handy in times of danger - it gets you into action straight away
So you can't say the amygdala is stupid - in times of danger it's very smart
At other times, it's stupid
it can't reason, it only (re)acts
So this is kind of what's happening in society - don't judge superficially
because 'cowardice' is an empty word
'I don't feel the need to do this'
'When I feel the need, I'll do it'
It depends on the complexity of the information and the complexity of the processor
That's reality
'Why were the Romanians cowards when...something happened..?'
Which of them was a coward?
What human category were they?
Which were the brave ones? What was their personality profile?
The complexity of thinking of a certain category was not the same as that of another category
The universe of cognition, of reception, of understanding was different
(the moment you don't do what you think you should do out of fear)
(of certain negative repercutions you might face  is cowardice)
It's opportunism, not fear of repercutions
(call it opportunism if you like)
I'll give you an example
My wife saw once, and told me,
....there were some elections at one point
and a gypsy woman appeared at the ballots
which made her choice
and recieved some money from the ones in charge - the elections were arranged/rigged
Unfortunately, these things happen
The woman took the money
put it in her pocket, and later returned with her children
What's the big deal? She was making some money, and didn't care anyway
Here universe didn't reach social responsibility level
She was somewhere at the bottom of Maslow's pyramid
This was her level of consciousness - another layer
(there are also examples of intellectuals)
If you start an argument with that woman, you'll find she's no coward
There are all sorts of layers even in the case of intellectuals
(people who have the power of the word, who could move masses, but don't do so
(out of fear of losing certain benefits, certain positions)
Maybe, maybe not - did you talk to them?
(no)
It would have been interesting to have talked to them
Maybe some of them actually believed in what was happening
I have met all sorts of people
I can also give you just as many examples as you can give me
(I can give you the example of a philosopher, ex-foreign minister)
(he was talking about how he opposed communism)
(by over-eating because one of the communists' goals was to starve the population)
(it was a joke)
I don't know if he was being ironic or not,
in any case, at the level of....
(why can't you accept that we are different?)
...and another thing, since when have ministers been selected on the basis of intelligence?
Have you ever seen, until now,
the selection of government or parliament being made after an intelligence test?
(manhood is a sign of intelligence, it pertains to a certain verticality)
So this guy was more feminine....
(what does 'manhood' mean? Can women have 'manhood'?)
(yes, of course, you've got more than we have!)
(no, I'm feminine!)
(I'd like to ask a question - how does information change into matter?)
The coherent informational packages
have the tendency to maintain their coherence
In order to have matter
there must be something that has coherent information
In other words, I take this pretzel in my hand
and it doesn't disintegrate into thin air
it doesn't turn into smoke
There are some bonds that hold all the pretzel atoms together
in the same shape and formula
This is established with the help of information compatibility
and the coherence of the basic information package
If there is an internal dynamic
and it needs just an impulse for it to become coherent
that pretzel can explode in my hand
You need just one well targeted neutron  sent with great speed into a structure of Uranium
to start a chain reaction that ends up in an explosion
...or just one virus thats ends up in the right cell over which it takes power and multiplies there,
to create an epidemic
Because it takes advantage of an existinig incoherence
Otherwise it can't get in if it doesn't have the 'door' of incoherency
So matter becomes stable and coherent
with the help of information
The information can be coherent or not
If we have lattice automata that rezist the fact that they have an incoherence,
but by transmitting it from one place to another, they don't fall appart/disintegrate,
I'll have particles
than can have a very short life span,
or longer and longer...infinite life span...
Their finite or infinite life span is in accordance with coherence
And coherence is established with the help of internal information - the feedbacks that are there
and which concatenate in a stable or unstable manner
OK?
(...yes...more or less...I'll think about it...)
It's always good to think about things
especially as these are not simple things
Questions
(were there any other intermediate structures before the feedback structure,)
after which certain decisions were made in this respect?)
Here we have a very interesting problem
because it's related to passing from one level of the universe's development to another
If the feedback structure appeared in such a moment
and spread subseqently,
until it created a new dimension of the universe
it has to reflect itself in matter
We are looking into this right now, because cosmology speaks of dark matter, dark energy,
black holes, white holes,
leaps between matter-information through worm holes,
multiverses, etc.
These are, let's say, the most modern theories
which in fact shows there is an evolution of the universe
which spread to the entire portfolio of possible decisions
and the ones that had coherence after multiple iterations remained
Maybe the feedback wasn't like this initially
I took the feedback with the help of just some of the sets of automorphisms of the projected line
which give a bi-ratio
The bi-ratio takes you the constant 1
But I can take a un-harmonic ratio in which I don't have the constant 1 in the end, I can have any number
And if I take any number, I can find something relatively similar
but which I haven't studied to see the overall level of coherence
So we can have surprises to see there are many types of universes
but with which we cannot communicate because we are not coherent with them
Just as there are all sorts of classes of species
that comminicate and work with eachother on the same auditive frequencies
but which do not exist on other auditive frequencies
The bat will never communicate with the elephant
because the elephant is deaf to the bat's signals
and the bat is deaf to the elephant's signals
They can't interpret and have feedback
So such a leap that ocurred could have a lot of possibilities/features
which could have created a lot of algebraic fractals,
but this is the only coherent one we have - we don't know anything about any others
Because we can't even be able to know
We don't know, because we can't communicate, we cannot evaluate anything
Our instruments are on the 'x' frequency
Questions
(you showed us that if many causes have the same effect,)
(can we say that they reverse - the effect become a cause that attracts effects?)
(a reversal of cause and effect?)
This happens sometimes
Coherence may require the causes to be re-done
This happens, for instance, in illness or healing/recovery
When a person is ill or recovering, he has a certain problem,
he doesn't get better with medicine, nor herbal remedies,
he gets better with music, let's say
He undergoes melotherapy - unbelievable!
How come?
Or he goes to the miracle spring, drinks water from there and is cured
I talked to oncologists who confirmed this - we don't know how and why he is cured
We have no idea
The person is suddenly cured
There is a famous case:
a guy who had skin cancer - he was covered in lesions
went to see a psychologist
who analysed him and God knows what he told him ....
reverse psychology, etc.....
and, curiously, the guy got better, he was fully cured
This case had media coverage
until some people who contested the case published a study which demonstrates that
something like this is not possible, it's a trick,
and the guy in question read the respective study
and was convinced it was correct, and that there was no way he was cured,
so he was again covered in lesions and died 2 weeks later
Lots of causes for the same effect - the effect asked for its cause
Sometimes it's not coherent with the other experiences,
so then it goes back to the place that gives it coherence and colapses
(i.e. the effect attracts the cause)
Yes
(every time?)
Yes, and there is remission in certain illnesses
Grigorina can give you more information on this - especially cancer patients
these case are well studied
The patients undergo a lot of therapies and treatments, there is an improvement, and then, suddenly,
out of a minor thing, they go into remission - they are 'asking' for the disease
(not ony cancer, also in the case of auto-imune diseases)
(there are remissions in cancer, but they are more unexpected in other diseases)
...allergies..
(I think the initial diagnostic is very important)
(it's possible to have had an illness that you were not aware of, and the moment you find out - it gets worse)
I know an elderly person who had tuberculosis
He goes to the doctor, and the doctor tells the nurse just one thing - 'he's dying' ('moare' in Romanian)
The gentleman thanks the doctor and goes home
and start drinking pickled cabbage juice - called 'moare' in those parts -
and is cured
Placebo effect
...very interesting...the causes are multiple
This person didn't want to die
so anything took him to his desired effect
...expected effect...anything - pickled cabbage juice was perfect!
Questions
(from all you have told us, the obvious conclusion is we have no idea who we are!)
Yes, we are currently in the childhood of mankind
(we have no idea of our potential and capabilities)
Yes, it's true, but the interesting thing is that you can find out
through training
Without thorough training, you had no idea you could do what you are doing now
You would never have thought of it
(the body materialises your state of mind and beliefs - if you think you are weak, then you become weak)
And the body has mechanisms for this
we'll have a look now...
...you are already familiar with this mechanism...
The limbic system
It's an extraorinary mechanism
because
we have the cingulate gyrus
This is our monkey brain
A lot of people get upset when they hear they are mammals...they think they are plants...
...maybe pumpkins...
...they are offended
The cingulate gyrus which works with/on emotions
then there is the dentate gyrus that handles personal memory
that goes to the thalamus where there are dreams and scenarios
The hypothalamus takes a dream and a scenario - 'I want to be a spaceman' -
it gets to the pituitary gland,
which has a neurological part that takes the signal,
and a part that secretes and adjusts the hormones according to the respective signal
to ensure it gets to all the other internal secretion glands and organs,
and also controls the body's development - especially in children
And so the child wants to become Hercules
and thinks/believes he will bocome Hercules....
...and with little or no physical effort, his body starts to model itself according to the objective
...If she wants to be slim and graceful to win the hearts of boys,
...she will become so...
...If she doesn't care what she looks like, she just wants to be smart,
she won't look so great, but she will be smart
So 'the project' goes all the way down
These are projection mechanisms
(if you say 'I don't want be fat', it's not the same as 'I want to be thin', right?)
It's correct, only here the thalamus is working
which is progressive/ongoing
and has it's own perceptions which stabilise the hormones and the rest
(we self-project ourselves)
Yes
(so we can draw similarities with artificial intelligence which can self-develop)
Yes, but the big problem is that AI is currently designed by copying human intelligence
and the human mechanisms
(the idea is that, as I said regarding the cingulated gyrus,)
(even though it belongs to the mamalian brain, and maybe don't regard it as very important,)
(it's capable of making huge leaps)
Yes
(and also the brainstem, and other so called 'primitive' brain structures)
Because it's not the only mechansim - there is another
This is the (only) one that expresses itself via the pituitary gland
but there is another that expresses itself via the pineal gland
and this mechanism......
I don't know if I can find something with all of them grouped together,
because they can't be properly represented in a 2D image.....
but
The second mechanism
is more complicated, because,
you see these nerve shafts which form a fractal antenna,
the pineal gland which works with the fractal antenna
...then...
this actually works with the 'great' intelligence, with the collective subconscious,
it doesn't work for the individual's adaptation to society,
it works directly with society's intelligence
All these components [see screen]
are part of another mechanism which generates great cognitive leaps,
and which is also linked to the brainstem
It's the second mechanism, which we link to spirituality and to the development of human skills/abilities,
not mamalian
(is this the case for positive, or negative disintegration?)
Both
Because the corpus callosum links the 2 structures -
the neocortex and the neural structures from the limbic system
and there is a negotiation between these 2 structures
But at the claustrum level there are the giant neurons which connect all the cortical areas
and this makes possible a collaboration at the respective level
between the cortical areas in accordance to the development of the giant neurons
The giant neurons also develop on frequencies -
the influence of frequencies
emitted by the brainstem and other areas
(does the coherence of information at brain level influence the shape of the skull?)
The coherence of information determines first of all the shape of the neural circuits
which participate in what we call 'the truth of the information' from the respective circuit's area
...validation that the information is correct
And, indeed, from thereon, if the information is coherent,
neurogenesys occurs,
and, yes, the skull develops differently
The body adapts - it's amazing - you saw vortices...
Not phrenology, but the type of intelligence
The type of intelligence
If there is an accumulation of grey matter in a certain region of the cranium
it's clear that there is a more pronounced type of intelligence in that case
(when they saw I had a big head as a child, they thought I was smarter - they were wrong!)
It's good to be free of any doubts!
You are more free
(speaking of the limbic system, on what kind of emotion does thinking develop?)
You saw where emotions are found - the cingulate gyrus,
but it works directly with the cerebellum, and a lot of other areas - the connections are very interesting
Actually the cingulate gyrus is a very important formation, so is the corpus callosum
It sets the tone
here in the cerebellum the frequency which amplifies the tone is given
and the corpus callosum transmits everything that's happening there to other areas
This is  also a feedback mechanism
(can we speculate something?)
Of course, noone is stopping you
(what do you think of the idea that each of us unconsciously develops)
(a 'self' similar to a computer which is connected to, let's say, the Cloud)
Consciously this can't be done, but unaware you can
but this means to create the capacity to change the level of perception (of detail) of understanding reality
If the level of perception (of detail) of understanding is enhanced, and you begin to see the inner mechanisms
then your whole cognition horizon expands greatly
but this doesn't mean you'll still recognise the coarser levels of detail,
because they will no longer have the same meaning to you
They will have a totally different meaning
For a doctor, for instance, the red cheeks of a pretty girl - what do you think they mean?
The first clue
(good health)
Good health or tuberculosis?
(it can mean a lot to the trained eye)
It's obvious!
It can mean a lot of things
So the level of perception (of detail) has changed - you see and understand things differently
I've got you thinking again...
(last time we mentioned the integration of  polarities - the nodes in the model can be changed)
(observing and maintaining coherence)
(do we have cognitive dissonance in this context?)
(the subject perceives both alternatives)
(it triangulates at another level of perception of detail, in order to escape it)
(how can we understand things also from this perspective?)
(cognitive dissonance generates a lot of stress, also at limbic system level....)
Cognitive dissonance at universe level means multiverse
A certain formula is assumed and that's the respective meaning
At personal level, it means potential double- or triple personalities
which means parallel circuits which do not communicate with eachother
but which can switch from one to the other
It can mean actions
which can be very tough,
for instance the religious war between muslims and christians
which was permanent in Europe
had cognitive dissonance - nobody wanted to hear what the other had to say
(much of cognitive dissonance is based on the cingulate gyrus's activity)
(because, selfishness and empathy are situated especially in the front part)
(and also positive integration)
(but the gyrus also has a lot of connections with the prefrontal cortex)
(which is considered to be the most recent and smartest brain structure)
(but, in a way, you must subdue the gyrus's activity in order to have an efficient prefrontal cortex)
(and the same goes for the lower levels)
You can't be intelligent if you're stressed
You think you are, but you're not
You can't discover new things, new meanings...
Stress blocks you at a certain level of perception (of detail), and that's it
(not subdue - sorry - optimise the cingulate gyrus's activity)
(like all the other clusters, the cingulate gyrus has a range of activity)
(selfishness has it's range, so does empathy, altruism, etc. - it's the interplay between these ranges/modules)
(that render a certain general behaviour)
It's intersting, especially because it must be studied
But there currently is an openness toward complexity which allows us to further understand
the informational relationship
it's not easy, especially if your whole life you're used to weighing with a scale and measuring with a ruler,
to recognise the patterns
It's happening, but it needs a gestation period
(if we want to discover the invariants - for human experience at social level it's easier)
(but if we go into an area in which we have no experience - science, for instance,)
(how can we discover the invariants?)
It's not easy even at human level
(let's say there is a vocabulary)
What you say is true, only, also at human level,
certain behaviours were selected as being 'good'
in order to maintain the coherence of a system which could have been bad
For instance, obedience is selected for a command-control system
In itself, obedience is not good
Cowardice is also selected in such a system
The respective package depends first of all on the project it pursues/follows
The project is what's important
Because of this, at social level, we don't have a complete image at all
The external environment's influence is dominating
and it selects the packages of features that we recognise
The ones we don't recognise, we don't know
They are not practised/applied
...in the end, we live in an extended village...
..in a village, things are simpler...
..there are fewer people, the number of features/characteristics is clearer...
and the interpretations are also distinct
So, let's say, if Veronica is talking by the gate with Johnny,
it's ok if it's before 9 p.m.
but if it's after 11 p.m. it's not ok, and the whole village is gossiping
So regulatory mechanisms come into play
and eliminate harmful factors
This elimination of harmful factors and the selction of packages of information
that are coherent for a certain social system
make us have absolutely no control over the understanding of social mechanisms
Invariants can be studied, but we don't have time to get into this now,
according to actions
But we'll talk about this at one point
But to give you an idea how they are studied, metaphorically speaking,
let's say that you take a picture of yourself
with your phone
and on top of your image, you also see the picture of yourself you just took
You have your phone in your hand
and your image is also there
but it's in a little square
The little square your image is in has the same shape as the phone
There is just one point
which is invariant to change
..let's say the tip of your shoulder...
which coincides in your reflection in the phone and your picture
It has exactly the same position
That is an invariant point
If you shrink your  image with the phone in your hand to the size of the phone
you'll see lots of pictures within pictures of the same image
but that point remains where it is, unchanged
It's the same point on your shoulder which has the same position everywhere - the invariant
The same applies to the social invariants, the invariants in medicine, health  and other areas
I think we have to stop now
Next time we'll start practical applications, today I felt the need to explain the shapes
I think it's fundamental
Translation: Raluca Ana Cristina Ionescu
