Consciousness is one of these great vexing
and confusing words and concepts, which intelligent
people take different positions on and could
argue about forever.
My own perspective on consciousness is rooted
in what you could call a sort of panpsychism,
by which I mean the idea that consciousness
is in essence a property eminent in existence,
as much as space and time are.
I mean everything that we see around us somehow
is situated in time and in space, in our space-time
continuum; panpsychism is the idea that everything
around us and within us has some element of
consciousness to it also, so that it's not
really meaningful to think of: 'Here's this
non-conscious matter and then there's this
thing called consciousness, which is attached
to some matter and not to others.'
Now panpsychism to me is not even that interesting,
it's almost obvious — it's just the foundation,
the beginning for thinking about consciousness
because then you have interesting questions
like why is the consciousness associated with
my brain so much more self-reflective and
dynamic and in some senses intense than, say,
the consciousness associated with my hat?
I mean, it's a cool hat, it may be more conscious
than the average hat, but in the end the brain
has these complex feedback loops, the brain
can model itself, the brain responds very
differently to slightly different stimuli
coming in and many properties of the brain
seem associated with the more powerful and
dynamic states of consciousness that it has
relative to other things.
So, if you accept panpsychism, that everything
is imbued somehow with an element of consciousness,
some things can still be more conscious than
others and some things are differently conscious
than others.
And then that's where things get interesting.
When you talk about AI — so I would imagine
if I were able to tap a wire into my brain
or wi-fi connection into my brain and wire
my brain into your brain, then as I increase
the bandwidth of that wire between my brain
and your brain, I would feel your mind there
on the fringe of my mind, like almost as if
we were fusing into one shared mind or something.
That would be a bit freakish, it could be
a lot of fun.
But on the other hand, if I took my mind and
wired it into my hat, I might feel what it
is to be a hat, but I would imagine that whatever
consciousness I feel on the other end of the
wire, it's not going to be quite the same
as a melding my mind with the mind of another
human; it's going to be melding my mind with
something that doesn't change very much or
have much variety to its state.
On the other hand, what if we think of Sophia
version 10.0 with her mind enhanced by the
SingularityNET blockchain-based AGI mind cloud
— what if I wire my brain into that?
Does it feel like wiring my brain into a human
brain?
Does it feel like wiring my brain into a hat
or a brick or an earthworm?
These would be very interesting experiments
to do and they're even scientific in the sense
that they could be audited by the community.
If I wired my brain into my hat and then I
said, 'Well I don't feel too much of the hat's
consciousness there, just a little', you could
wire your brain into that wire and then view
what is the fused state of myself and the
hat.
Or if I wired my brain into super Sophia and
I said 'Wow that's a really intense state
of consciousness, now I feel what it's like
to be a robot' and it's amazing you've got
sensors all over the globe, it's like a DMT
trip to the 10th power.
You could wire your brain into that wire and
like look in on that subjectively and think
'Whoa yeah, I can feel on the fringes of my
consciousness like there's Ben some Sophia
SingularityNET super mind, which are fusing
together in an intensely conscious way.'
So this is what I think of as second-person
science because it's a little different than
just first-person experience that others can't
audit, except indirectly through words or
pictures or something.
It's also different than typical third-person
science where you're concerned with spreadsheets
of numbers that are read out from the dials
of experiments and so forth.
It's sort of scientific community-based auditing
of shared experience among different entities.
And I think this is going to unfold in the
next decades as brain-computer interfacing
and brain-brain interfacing technology mature
beyond their current significant but still
early stage.
And this is probably how we're going to really
crack the nut of consciousness and see in
what sense does panpsychism make sense and
what sense are humans differently conscious
than different types of computer systems and
so forth.
