FREE SPEECH IN ALBION (ALIAS ENGLAND)
#38 (May 17, 1942) U.K.(B45)
FREE SPEECH IN ALBION (ALIAS ENGLAND)
The propaganda for free speech in Britain
(listlessly elegiac, retrospective) r sounds
as follows: "The
murderer stole my watch but his wife told
him not to. We have free speech in this family."
That is how it sounds HERE. No one denies
that free speech is a fine old British tradition.
One complains that it is a moth-eaten tradition:
a shadow with small present substance. The
series of outrages committed by British governments
in the past. Chesapeaken Leopard, etc. are
in history. That Bright protested, etc. during
the United States Civil War, is in history.
What the B.B.C. does NOT care to admit is
the profound resemblance between England's
divide et
impera during our United States Civil War,
and her policy on the continent of Europe.
All of which is most keenly analyzed in Mein
Kampf, a book as slandered in England and
as much
obscured by press mud as any other.
It is the points to WHICH British free speech
does not APPLY that we want to hear about.
Free speech
has been cornered. We complain that the British
press was rotten, and had been for over a
century. My
memory goes back considerably further than
Mr. Bridson's, whatever Winnie said in 1936:
I can match it. I
remember the pavements of London "WE WANT
EIGHT" back before the other war started.
Winston was alius shoutin' for gun sales,
high pressure salesmanship of blood, cannon,
and slaughter.
BUT at the same time upholdin' a usury system
which made it impossible to deliver the cannon.
Hence
bringing slaughter on Europe.
It is not the question of British chauvinism,
but the mixture of chauvinism and absolute
utter
dishonesty, and a refusal to look at the economic
causes of war that disgusts the foreign observer.
That
some Englishmen dislike being betrayed needs
no argument. That the English people did NOT
desire the
war needs no argument. The point is they kept
on having governments that insisted on having
a war. The
British people are NOT represent ed. The B.B.C.
may run a very good (up to a point) retrospect
about Free
Speech in England. BUT to couple that with
the unholy alliance with Russia does not convince
the
opponent of England's bona fide, rather of
idiocy and dishonesty.
Kumrad Maisky 's FACE, like the hindend of
a pig, for example. WHY does England suppose
that
Kumrad Maisky will hesitate any longer about
bumping off George VI and Elizabeth, than
his pals did
about killin' the Czar, with Temple of Canterbury
sayin' the blessin'? No, Temple is a prize
comic,
possibly Lang WOULD have pronounced an Episcopal
benediction? Temple don't, I think, mean any
harm, just fat headed.
Rhetoric about "our representatives in Parliament"
is NOT the point. The point is your Parliament
does
NOT represent you. That is the syndicalist
complaint against Parliaments in the old rotten
borough or
disguised rotten bank-borough form.
Every CONstructive measure proposed to camouflage
the iniquity of your usuries is a slavish
copy of
the corporate state.
BUT without the corporate structure, just
patchin', and NOT hitting for the main evil.
Money is
admitted by at least one B.B.C. yapper to
be a financial label. But interest? When does
that occur properly?
And WHO fixes the label, and in whose interests?
And IS there a Jewish problem?
Perhaps, along with Carlyle's love for his
wife, and the fine old husky sailor voices
telling of the
Chesapeake and the Leopard, there might be
a historic sketch of the Jews and Noll Crummwell,
and a FEW
probes into the WHY of the present struggle,
and the REFUSALS to cooperate with the civilized
world,
and the hook-up with Russia.
Does the Bolshevic government stand for the
best English traditions: free speech, and
no taxation
without representation?
Fat lot of representation your tax payers
have had in this budget. Though I dare say
they have been by
now so hog swoggled by propaganda, appeals
to their finest feeling, that they are ready
to murder their
children and grandmas in the cause of 60%
on real deposits. And a perfect fury of abuse
and hysteria when
some Frenchman opens a book of geography and
discovers what was long since known to Theophile
Gautier, namely that France is a part of Europe.
ON THE MAP, geographically, France is a PART
of
Europe, and her sanity and welfare would consist
IN functioning as PART of Europe.
Preferably a Frenchman, not a half nigger,
half Jew bridged head of Anglo-Judaea. Some
idea, that is
the GEOGRAPHIC idea, may someday enter England.
But no signs of British desire to collaborate
in a
new order have yet emerged from the British
Bleat Corps halls of transmission.
Divide et impera. I dunno who translated Mein
Kampf 'into English. Here Bompiani or someone
had an idea, and stroke of genius, and printed
the second half first, so Italian readers,
some of 'em, came straight on the program,
constructive program, health, responsibility,
personal, and a study of history. Elsewhere
in the book, you can see Hitler (if you have
YET begun to develop an interest in that opponent
of your infamies: you can see Hitler thinking
about the evils of having Innthal, valley
of the Inn, cut off from the rest of the German
Volk. You can see him, figgerin' out for Germany,
what a few Americans figured out for the United
States of America. Divide et impera.
Of course, you are gittin ' divided for the
same old Sassoon [who is] wantin' U. S. farm
boys to squeeze
interest out of the Hindoos, now that T. Atkins
is getting scarcer.
The rest of the world is tired, bloody well
TIRED of having Chesapeakes and RESULTS:
accompanied by Mrs. Burglar Bill tellin' Bill
not to do it. Yes, some British protested
against chattel
slavery. The wheeze, the BANK wheeze, now
KNOWN, and recorded in history, being that
wage slavery
was CHEAPER, that LESS responsibility devolved
on the OWNERS (alias employers) of wage slaves
than
on the owners of black slaves, who had to
feed 'em to keep up their workin' potential.
ALL that is
HISTORY.
The world, especially Europe, is tired, tired,
and the English stock, the part of the English
RACE in the
colonies was tired from 1 750 onward of being
sanctioned, of having their OWN money censored.
Sanctioned, forbidden — their AUTARCHY,
such as it was, sabotaged, their prosperity
sabotaged by a kike
gang or a sub-kike or super-gang of grafters
and monopolists, headquarters in London.
And YOU will, I 'spose, get your karma, your
contrapasso when the head office shifts from
Last
Cheape, and Thredbobbin Alley over to Wall
, Street with Wailing included. Shama Yssrael,
the one true
fatherland is the pawn shop.
Why take that INTO your so very [valued] tradition.
Beatin' your breasts. Give us a nut to crack
and
God can crack it. As for the people, one of
your own living poets has beaten his hairy
breast as follows:
We can think as we are told to think
We are the echo of the loudest bark
We are the arses kicked by better men
There is this very uncurious mixture in British
propaganda. The wailing wall, AND the reminiscence,
the old lavender, the Spanish Armada, etc.
The TRADITIONS, the better of which 20 years
of British
politics have done so little to maintain.
You can't expect me to stenograph all your
noises. [I'd] go out of my head when I wake
up the next
morning in a country that asks RESULTS and
about which YOU apparently know very little.
Why, for example, should Hitler and Mussolini
who have been through a great deal more than
I have,
who have been thru a great deal I have not,
endured hardships I have not, why should they
be scared by
Mr. Hull, Mr. C. Hull or Eden, when these
stiffed effigies can't even scare ME?
Why all this talk of the German Staff regardin'
with fear and trembling the arrival of a few
motor
boats at Le Portel, or wherever, the 33 or
what ever out of the 50 or whatever remained
with their
ammunition; pore devils? TO take England's
MIND OFF England's business, the business
she OUGHT to
have been minding and HOW, since 1919, since
Versailles defrauded Italy.
