What is a magnetic spin vortex?
Most people are aware that when you look
at the effects of a magnetic field under
a magnetic viewer it looks something
like this. However, most people are not
aware that every permanent magnet emits
a spinning vortex from its North and
South Poles. The actual spin vortex looks
similar to this diagram The North
produces a counterclockwise spin, while
the South, a clockwise spin. What
determines whether one side of the
magnet attracts another is actually it's
directional spin. Opposite directional
vortex spins will attract, while like
directional vortex spins will repel.
What we think of as North and South
Poles are really clockwise, 
counterclockwise vortex spins emitted by
the magnet. This is what the field of
spintronics is all about. The earth
itself is a giant magnet moving through
space, and everything on it exhibits spin.
From the currents of the ocean, to the
jet stream, to the Age rings of a tree.
If you look for it everything in nature
exhibits spin. Tornadoes tend to rotate
counterclockwise in the Northern
Hemisphere and clockwise in the southern
hemisphere. However, the opposite can
occur. Which undercuts the common
misconception. A tornado's directional spin is actually the result of the Coriolis
force. There's also the common
misconception that a drain north of
equator will create a counterclockwise
vortex, and south of the equator a
clockwise vortex. This is not always the
case.
What's interesting to note though, is
that all things in nature exhibit spin.
And not only nature. Spin is the nature
of the universe itself. All matter is
made up of forces, or force fields, if you
will. Whether they be electrical,
gravitational, or magnetic. Or understood
as resonance, vibrational forces, and
frequency. They all share a semblance to
magnetic fields. And the commonality
of spins. Particles of matter itself all
exhibits spin.
Whether it's microscopic, or on a cosmic
scale, but I digress.
What does all of this have to do with
the magnetic spin vortex.
I've laid all of this out to explain
that everything in nature, at a molecular
level, already exhibits continuous spin.
So it's not so much a matter of getting
a magnetic structure to spin. The
individual magnets are already spinning.
On a molecular level.
So understanding the spin vortex of a
magnet places you one step closer to
building a magnet motive force closed
loop system. The idea of tapping the
magnetic spin vortex for a closed loop
system, has been around for awhile. 
Before I present some ideas on how this
might be done, let me show you some ways it can't.
And also share an interesting
design idea by David Hamel. Hamill's
magnetic motor utilizes the magnetic
spin vortex and gravity in his design.
People have been trying to over simplify
his design into something like this. Which
has been called the Hamel spinner. The
first one I saw was presented by George
Green and Project Camelot. If you really
study the simplified design it's
actually not making use of the spin
vortex, which I'll explain in a moment. It
looks really interesting at first glance,
but it isn't really accomplishing what
it seems to be.
In this video he calls the process Spin
Vortexing. I enjoyed his video, but
respectfully disagree with his analysis.
He's presenting essentially the same
theory as John Bedini. According to
Bedini, by placing the magnets in a ring
with all the north poles facing in, the
spins of the individual magnets form one
large spin vortex. Bedini also states that
this configuration forms a vortex above
the ring magnet arrangement, and another
below it. Additionally, by flipping the
ring, he states, that the spinner will
switch from a clockwise to a
counterclockwise rotation. Due to the
spins emanating  from the ring magnet
arrangement. Producing a clockwise
rotation in one direction, and a
counterclockwise rotation in the other. I
respectfully disagree with all three
points. With the emphasis on respectfully.
I have a great deal of respect for John
Bedini and his research, but I believe
his conclusions in this case to be
incorrect . And here's why. You can
actually induce rotation of a spinner in
clockwise or counterclockwise rotation
without flipping the ring magnet
arrangement around. Regardless of whether
you use John Bedini's closed ring
configuration, or George Greene's open
ring configuration. To further illustrate
my point,  you don't need a ring magnet
configuration to get the spinner to
rotate. Any simple magnet will do. So it's
not the configuration at all that's
causing the spinner to spin. It's also
of note, the spinner will not rotate if
you don't continue to move the ring
magnet around. If you place it in a
stationary position the spinner won't
spin at all. If you move it to induce
rotation, it will stop spinning shortly
after you discontinue manually
manipulating magnetic field between the
spinner and ring magnets. Configuring the
magnets in this way does not create a
vortex above and below the magnetic ring
assembly. Magnetic vortices are in
the same place they would be if you
didn't arrange them into the ring
directly above and below each magnet. So the
magnetic vortises are actually
concentrated in the center of the ring,
not above and below it.
David Hamel understood this. In his
design he placed a ring magnet assembly
inside of a larger ring magnet assembly
so that the magnetic or vortices would be
facing each other.
If these magnetic ring magnet
arrangements were actually creating a
vortex above and below the ring, what
would happen if you placed the ring
vertex in close proximity to another
ring vortex. If one ring was held
stationary, would it not induce spin in
the ring that was held by a string above
it? What if you used two rings? One above
and one below? What if you imbalanced the
Rings so that there spin vortices
could not line up? It's quite obvious
that there's not a spin vortex being
created above or below the ring magnet
arrangements. Regardless of whether you
use a closed ring configuration or
removed one magnet from the an assembly
as demonstrated in George Greene's
version. Every version I presented here
would spin for a short time when
introduced to a magnetic field, and then
slowed to a dead stop. To conclude. The
reason the spinner rotates is simply due
to the fact that when you place the
magnet on the state ball it can't move
in a direct path toward the ring magnets.
And since the ball can't roll with a
magnet attached to it, it has to turn.
Therefore, it will spin toward whatever
side of the magnetic arrangement is
placed in the closest proximity to the
magnet on the spinner. These spinners are
little more than toys. Fun to play around
with, but they don't conclusively prove
or demonstrate anything, other than
simple magnetic attraction. Now I don't
say that disrespectfully. I actually
enjoyed all of the videos demonstrating
the spinner.
I'm only clarifying what the spinner is
actually doing in all of these
experiments to lay out some groundwork
for how a magnetic spin vortex works.
Sometimes, the blaze down new paths you
first have to shatter the misconceptions.
Here's a channel I highly recommend. If
you have a real interest in magnetics
you're probably not going to find a
better YouTube
channel on the subject. I'd suggest going
through his entire selection of
magnetics videos. And there's a whole
video devoted to spin vortex.
This is another channel I'll recommend.
It also has a couple of videos on the
spin vortex. He uses an electrical charge,
in conjunction with a magnet, to
demonstrate the spin vortex though, so it's not a conclusive demonstration.
But interesting, all the same.
So in my final analysis there is a very
simple reason why the magnetic spin
vortex is of great importance in the field
permanent-magnet motive force systems.
Namely, if you assemble the rotor with
just the right ferromagnetic,
paramagnetic or diamagnetic material, you
could place it in the path of a strong
magnetic field and it would ride the
magnetic spin vortex like a windmill rides the wind.
Food for thought. Thanks for watching.
Do great things!
