The ECPA, as amended, protects wire, oral, and electronic communications while those communications are being made, are in transit, and when they are stored on computers. The Act applies to email, telephone conversations, and data stored electronically.
1.  Because I am not under any criminal investigation, pertaining to release on pretrial release pursuant to the Bail Reform Act, 18 USC 3142, the applicable law - Title I, II, 18 USC 2515 and 18 USC 1708
- is conclusive and long held law - email is mail and it cannot be read under the circumstances of pretrial release.  There are no exceptions except upon criminal investigation (and a warrant is required specifically naming 'mail')Tampering with mail is a felony offense.
2.  Now that it is proven that one-ongoing felony has occurred against the defendant, the defendant ask the court to review dismissing the case for tampering with a witness, that the defendant is a witness to his own - he being the pro se defendant in the case.
3.  In no way can citing the Bail Reform Act for legal authority comply with any known law, because the Bail Reform Act makes no mention of whether or not email is mail.  The Bail Reform Act, or any contract-agreement cannot be used to harm someone.
Specifically, it is not legal and in poor legal standing and taste to even ask someone to sign over their right to keep their email, their mail, private, and to allow someone to make recordings of their email, especially in this specific court with all it's jurisprudence,   Tampering with mail is a federal felony.  Tampering with a witness in a federal case is a federal felony.
4.  Once the email is stored on a computer (email server/user computer), it is protected from unauthorized access under the Stored Communications Act (Title II of Electronic Communications Privacy Act).
5. Obviously, just gaining a search warrant to read someones emails for months to years is normally, very-very difficult - yet the defendant has endured, thus far, approximately four months already of this crime against him illegally ordered by the court Magistrate Judge.
6. First class domestic mail may be opened, and the contents inspected, only (1) with the authorization of the addressee, (2) pursuant to a valid search warrant authorized by law, or (3) by an officer or employee of the Postal Service for the sole purpose of determining an address at which the mail can be delivered.
7. The monitoring software uses a "pen register" device which under Title III of 18 2515 must be accompanied by a warrant.  Pen register devices sometimes gather much more information then they are warranted or authorized to gather, and have been generally found to be illegal beyond the issuance of a warrant for their use (however this was not disclosed in the contract-agreement).
Email privacy is derived from the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and is governed by the "Reasonable Expectation of Privacy" standard. ... Emails are also governed by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) and the Patriot Act.
Finally, the court must specifically take notice and apprise itself that the defendant evidences only his rough draft, in-writing, unfinished emails as the subject topic of discussion, as pretrial record them while I write them, rather then recovering the finished emails from a storage device.
*******
