hello everyone once again the Psalmist is here today I just want to give you two points
why evolution is completely false and
not even a science now why do I say that
because this is like a huge statement
because there's so many scientists who
have studied from prestigious
universities who have believed that they
have proved that evolution is actually
food and a science so like I said I'm
going to give you two points which prove
that evolution is completely false
okay the first point which I'm going to
give you there isn't why evolution is
not science and it's completely false is
that the evolutionists and the
scientists tell us that life began on
earth by the formation of algae on rocks
because they had a problem in terms of
you know trying to explain how did life
change from inorganic matter which was
the rocks to organic matter which was
single as'll systems fast the algae and
the bacteria so this this is not science
and and it cannot be proved to be a
proof that evolutions I mean life on
earth started that way I'll give you an
example you can build a house anyone
within a house was or a rock which were
clean and you can after a few years or
even probably a few months you can start
to see oddly growing on the wall or on a
rock which you don't have algae on it so
it means that even today in our time we
do see that adi can form on a walk or on
a wall it proved that we can see even on
a time that Adi can form on walks and on
a wall now why that a problem for
evolutionists well the promise that if
algae was you know if ad was the origin
of life in the time when life began
about 650 million years ago as they say
the time when the lab started how then
do you
Kouga at the time when this adi was
forming on walks on earth when there was
no laughs how do you prove that indeed
there was no any other laughs there was
no trees there was no plans and there
was no animals because even in our
conditions in the conditions that we
have today
Algy still farms on walks and walls you
see that so if the problem because the
scientists and the evolutionists cannot
exclusively prove that at the time where
the odd which they are talking about
formed there was no life because as
Christians we believe that God created
Adam God created life on the earth when
they left did not originate from algae
so how do you prove exclusively to make
this real to say that at this time there
was no laughs but the parameter because
there was no one at the time when this
thing was happening about 650 million
years ago you cannot prove it but as we
can completely say it is false because
algae still forms on walls so you have
algae which forms on walks and then you
know on walls but you have no ape which
is changing from an egg to a human being
so the one part does not happen in our
time the other part happens and the
other part which happens that the origin
of life according to scientists and
evolutionary and the other part which we
cannot seems that will happen but how we
evolved from apes to human beings do you
see that do you see that is an error
they believe there because it's a mere
sumption is a mere it is just taking
what already exists and say this is what
it proves you put on us laughs that's
how life began I'm not saying it does
not prove that that last could have
became McNabb I'm saying that how do you
prove
at the time when this ad was for me one
walks there was no life around the algae
live from plants live from animals and
because you cannot prove that
exclusively to say that this exclusively
happened without any lab happening or
had any life existing around ugly
because this is your thesis you're
saying that life started this way last
era by deformation of algae on work
that's where last you know change from
inorganic matter to organic matter and
somebody comes with their own citizens a
war that was not the beginning of life
life was already there when the algae
was forming on the rocks and he gives
you an example and say you see now we
have life I'm here but there is algae
forming on a wall a house built by a man
do you see that now how do you first of
all I have to do two things you have to
prove the thesis of the person who's
making it as written antithesis to you
what you said happen you have to prove
that the way that he is saying that you
know I'll give forms even in the
conditions that which we have right now
you have to prove that as false but
that's not what happens but you cannot
disprove him because you can see for
yourself that I'll be does warm on walls
on houses put by man now 650 million
years ago if that's when if they really
happen
Algy could have formed on walks while
they were still left they were still
other plans they were still other forms
of bacteria there were still human
beings and animals and algae was forming
on their walks fast this thesis that
last began with algae forming on walks
it's not false in itself because while
you have a walk and life begins but it
was not life in terms of life in general
it was life in terms of the last of the
ugly like if you had to take his seed
and plow it and then a few grows but the
beginning of life for that tree but it's
not the beginning of life in general so
you have to see the difference you have
to see the difference between the
beginning of life of a species or of a
human being or of a plan and the deep
end at the firm I mean the beginning of
a lab in terms of life in general the
very origin of life so in saying that
last reform from inorganic matter talked
Alec meta from algae forming on walks it
is not false it is true because you
think that this is a rock but life is
forming on it
but that that say that this i'll give
was the was the first sign of life on
the earth can this be proven exclusively
that when this egg was growing on walks
it was the first sign of life there was
no less
anyway us there were no plants there
were no human beings there were no fish
there were no pets
there were not any other form of animal
on the earth can that be proven you
cannot be proven because for you to
prove it you will have to be there when
it happens
just like when we are looking at our
deforming on a wall or on a walk we are
there to observe it and even record it
because you can call it on your own wall
when a wall needs and the water comes
into the heart are you can form an wall
so you can take pictures or take video
so there was no argue there is argue so
it is scientific you don't even have to
be a scientist to prove this but this
one the scientists when they're saying
that that's how the beginning of life in
general that the very sign of life began
that's not is this this thing about our
deployment off does not prove that that
what the very beginning of life foam it
doesn't prove it it merely does prove
that yes organic matter can come from
inorganic matter testing a formation of
algae on what so that's the first reason
why I'm saying that is evolution is
completely false and not even in science
and because there is one reason a
scientist because there was assumptions
we made the
this is how life could be informed but
it is taught as this is fact and it's
taught as if it is something that they
have seen that they approve that this
heart happened so that's not science
because science you don't know soon you
make it thesis and you prove it but they
cannot prove that that is how life
indeed started that's the first vision
the formation of Adi one works does not
prove that that is the first sign of
life on earth because they cannot prove
that at that time when the algae was
forming which of course they didn't see
there was no any other life from clans
from trees from fish from beds around
the algae just like we can see today
that Algy conformant was from bricks by
man
while there is other forms of life like
us around it while it happened so the
second reason why I'm saying that in our
evolution is completely false and it's
not even a science is that they talk
about how evolution what happens is that
that you have a genetic mutation of a
species in which a species can grow an
ability to do something in which other
species has grown disability to do
something through genetic mutation is a
spring you know it's next generation of
species will be able to perform that
which the species has you know mutated
to be able to do for example we can say
that if a fish closed legs and not that
walk on land that is evolution we can
say if a human being miraculously grow
wins and now becomes able to fly like a
bed that is evolution that also is
completely false I'll tell you why it's
completely false
and because I'm using real science I'm
not a scientist but I'm using real
science in the algae that is real
science you can prove you can look at
are growing on a wall with bricks
we know built by man now I'm gonna prove
to you that this is thing that there's a
genetic mutation and then you you grow a
new kind of capacity or to be able
perform a certain function which your
offspring will automatically be able to
do both in effect that they are your
offspring and they have your genes this
is completely false I'll give you one if
you were to take a child a newborn child
and live it with animals that child is
going to completely act like an animal
if the animal is a dog that child is
gonna act like a dog
now if evolution was to be true that we
will want monkeys and then we stood on
two legs that means the next generation
of our offspring must be able
automatically to stand on two legs but
we have seen this before
children ways by animals the can't even
speak they can't even use the full you
know the capacity of their brain the way
that animal human being is able to you
see but by the scientific theory this
evolution theory that in the next
generation of a species by virtue of it
being an offspring of a species which
was not able to fly at once but crew
disability this the last generation
automatically must be able to fly
you see but we say that all these things
happen because of observing experience
and landing and doing like wise meaning
that a human child looks at the adults
and so the others are walking on two
legs but because the child does not have
the strength in his body to be able to
stand on two legs
it starts to use four limbs the hands
and the legs but the child has a goal to
say that I want to be like my mother I
want to be like my father and stand on
two legs so eventually as it uses its
capacities which are the limbs the limbs
get stronger the same way as a man who
when he lives with the muscles get
stronger so even a child also gets
stronger so eventually the child will be
able to stand on two legs why because
the child observed its saw it experience
and then from there it does like wise
but if this child would have been waste
by monkeys which of course we say that's
where we come from this child is going
to behave like monkeys why doesn't a
child stand on two legs if we does not
see any other thing around it stand on
two legs even though it's an offspring
of a species who stands on two legs and
by evolution explanation in theory they
are saying that this child must
automatically be able to stand on two
legs because it has the genes which have
evolved and from the new capacity a new
function which it did not have
previously and of course evolutionist
can say that well even in evolution you
still have to learn because what the
scientist is that they always adopt that
definition of things - what is going on
so that could go on and on so they
they're gonna say that well even in
evolution even though you might have the
capacity you still have to develop from
a teaching observing and all understand
but if you are saying that that's what
what must happen in evolution then it's
a problem for evolution why because it
means that the fast this transition from
a ape which was on four legs and then
from less that understand it means that
it has to be taught to do that but the
front that at the time there was not a
two in there so how did it do that so
the first ape our current evolution will
by its own ingenuity is own cleverness
then on two legs whatever there is no it
was trying to reach a fruit or something
so it will be able to stand on to the
Christus in any other ape doing it and
as time goes is jeans mistake and it is
now fully grown a new ability a new
capacity to stand on two legs now it
means that it would be impossible for
any offspring of this ape to devolve
another such a thing as evil because to
go back now as a human being to walk on
four limbs is going back to the monkeys
while evolution should be going forward
not backwards because its genes genes
cannot unless maybe we can say that
genes can devolve but the promise that
if genes can devolve it should be looked
at as a disability not a devolution but
if one says the devolution ok I'll give
you that then let's say that this child
is it a devolution or was it caused by
the dogs walking four limbs so you have
to be able to say it was devolution
because if the charge was waste by human
beings on two legs then we can say maybe
it's evolution because the child was
able to see what the a documents are
doing but was unable to do what other
human beings are doing but then how you
going to separate that from this ability
to devolution because they are people
who are disabled who cannot do what
other human beings are doing because
they have a disability do you see that
so because we have already when we can
order you establish scientifically that
a chart lens observes and do like once
and it's not evolution that's why a
child raised by dogs would behave like
dogs because it's looking at the dog is
observing the dogs and it's cutting what
the dogs do is if it was evolution it
should be able to say I'm a human being
and use this genetic mutation which is
inherited from his parents who are
walking on two legs and be able to work
without ever seeing anyone or anything
walk on two legs and so because even in
this case the evolutions in the
scientists have made assumptions then
that means they're not scientist they
just making assumptions or it's more
about you have scientific prophets like
Charles Darwin
Richard donkey and Stephen Hawking and
all the disciples of science and nearly
walking in their footsteps which are
proving everything that I've set for
themselves so in that in everything that
I've said that is proof that evolution
is not even a science and it's
completely false
you can argue but you cannot you have
felt well remember don't just argue
incessant it approved it and we have
even done all the things proof first two
points which you must prove
scientifically proof first
how did laughs change from inorganic
matter for garlic matter without having
any life around it because I've said
that you can have algae growing on walls
and walls are built by human beings
which means that algae can grow on words
while they still live around the desktop
plants the human business unmastered
spaces fish you have to prove that at a
time which you estimate that life status
is 650 million years ago
the ad was blowing on the rocks there
were no animals there were no plans
there were not fish there were no birds
that the first point would you have to
prove scientifically the second one the
cat second point you have to prove that
every species which inhaled a new
ability or a new capacity from its
parents which evolved by starting to do
this thing in terms of the ape standing
on two legs automatically the generation
which is to come will have the capacity
to stand on two legs without observing
other same species as itself doing the
same thing because an animal raises a
human being the human being behaves like
the animal the human being the human
being the human will behave like a human
being you have to be able to separate
both scientifically but if evolution
involves lending observing and doing
likewise then you're going to need the
first evolved ape to be taught and then
the question becomes who taught it if
there was teaching and evolution is
false because it means everything that
we do as human being we see we observe
we learn we do likewise that is teaching
that a development is not evolution but
if you cannot scientifically prove this
but merely arguing with the pure
statements which we made or taking this
definition of evolution and adapting to
a problem which arise against there
you're proving that evolution is false
but because it has so much power in the
school system in the Academy of the
sciences in all countries and people go
to school to learn it not to observe it
not to studied and critique it and see
the logic of it and so that they could
question and prove it for themselves you
always going to make people believe that
evolution shoot without having them
just proving it to be true anyway that
is all that I have to say about this
topic two points why evolution is
completely false and not even a science
so if you have anything to say I know
that the 80s will have a lot of things
that you can leave your comment below
and if you love to receive content like
this you can also apply to my channel so
you can continue TV correct content like
this thank you for listening
