
English: 
Dr. Vitale reading: "It ought to be founded on mutual
recognition of two liberties. The lovers
would then experience themselves as both Self and Other.
Neither would give up transcendence.
Neither would be mutilated. Together they
would manifest values and aims in the
world. For the One and the Other, love
would be a revelation of self by the
gift of self and enrichment of the world."
I think that's one of the most beautiful
things written! So when I read that, that gives
me hope. That says that there is a love
that's possible between two liberties.
Between two people who enhance each
other and let each other be free. And she
doesn't seem to think that this is
something that often happens in marriage.
student: yeah! that's what I was gonna...
Dr. Vitale: Which may be the case why she
doesn't marry her partner. And the last

Spanish: 
Dra. Vitale leyendo: 
“Debe ser fundada en el reconocimiento mutual de dos libertades.
Los amantes Entonces experimentaría ellos mismos como ambos como el yo y el otro.
Ni daría para arriba la trascendencia. Ni daría mutilar.
Conjuntos ellos manifestaría valor y objetivos en el mundo. Para el yo y el otro, amor
daría estar un revelación del mismo por el regalo del yo y el enriquecimiento del mundo.”
Dra. Vitale: !Creo que este es unas de las cosas más bonitas escrita! Entonces leo este, me da esperanza.
Se dice que es un amor que es posible entre dos libertades
Entre dos personas se mejoran y se permiten ellos mismos ser libre. Y ella
No parece pensar que es una cosa que ocurre con frecuencia en matrimonio.
Estudiante (fuera de la pantalla): Sí, yo iba…
Dra. Vitale: Que puede ser el caso por qué ella no se casa su pareja. Y el final

English: 
thing I have for you in this little thing is this poem.That I think beautifully encapsulates her notion of love.
*Thank you for the lecture, Dr. Vitale! :) *

Spanish: 
Cosa que tengo para tú en esta cosa es un poema que yo creo captura maravillosamente su noción de amor.
