There is an assumption made in most schools,
universities and even in the production of
documentaries on nature, that all scientists
are unanimous in their belief that life as
we know it on earth, evolved over time from
rudimentary non-life into viruses and cells
that then, over eons of time, developed into
the lifeforms we know today.
Is this assumption correct?
Does science support Evolutionary Theory?
The theory that life has evolved on earth
from non-life is widely touted as a universally
accepted idea by the scientific community.
However, upon careful examination of scientific
literature and statements of thousands of
highly qualified scientists, it appears nothing
could be further from the truth.
The website entitled "Scientific Dissent from
Darwinism" contains a list of 1000 PhD's in
just about every scientific field from around
the world, many holding senior posts in some
of the world's leading universities.
They have all signed in agreement with the
following statement: "We are skeptical of
claims for the ability of random mutation
and natural selection to account for the complexity
of life.
Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian
theory should be encouraged."
The idea that science is in agreement with
evolutionary theory is simply an untruth.
In fact there are three areas of science which
distinctly point to the need for an organizing
and intelligent power to have designed and
brought life into existence.
First of all there is the science of cosmology
� the study of the universe.
Today science generally agrees that the universe
had a beginning.
Since all evidence points to the fact that
the universe is expanding, then it must have
had a beginning.
This is supported by no less a scientist than
Dr. Alexander Vilenkin of Tufts University,
author of over 150 papers in theoretical physics
and cosmology.
He explains that:
Whatever begins to exist has a cause.
Something caused the universe to exist in
a well-designed, law-abiding way.
Secondly, the science of physics: The universe
is governed by law, law defined by a number
of constants that make the physical universe
and life possible such as: gravity, heating
and cooling, expansion, light etc.
These laws appear to be consistent throughout
the universe.
There are about 26 constants that must be
set at a precisely correct value in order
to allow the stars, planets and life to exist.
The odds of this occurring by chance, especially
given the number of possible settings, and
that only one combination will give us the
universe as we know it, are fantastically
improbable.
Hence Dr. Vera Kistiakowsky, Prof of Physics
at MIT, has stated:
"The exquisite order displayed by our scientific
understanding of the physical calls for the
divine."
A third area is the study of the structure
of the single cell.
In the days prior to the 1960's, the single
cell was known as a simple cell.
This expression "the simple cell", is no longer
used, as it is known to be a fallacy as a
result of the discoveries in microbiology.
Today the incredible intricacy of living cells,
with their complex organelles, molecular motors
and sophisticated chemistry, along with the
incredible mechanisms for self-reproduction,
all of which had to be present from the outset
to sustain life, presents an insurmountable
problem to the honest evolutionist.
The laws of cosmology, physics and the laws
and processes of biology are some of the issues
that motivated the scientists whose names
are found in the Dissent from Darwin list.
Please feel free to order and examine a new
and free publication entitled: "Evolution
and Creation: What Both Sides Miss".
You can acquire a copy online or, if you wish,
a free print version.
There is no obligation or follow-up.
I am Stuart Wachowicz for Tomorrow's World
Viewpoint.
Subscribe and click the notification bell
to receive updates about new content.
Visit TomorrowsWorld.org for more articles,
telecasts and booklets.
