¶627 So Mary has been
Masculinized. She's been made
Perfect, not Whole, and this is injurious
to the Feminine Principle of
imperfection and completeness. As I
said, I don't like this characterization
of it by Dr. Jung, but let's keep in mind that
Dr. Jung was living at the end of the 19th
Century, so we make allowances for him a
little bit. [Voice] You have a problem with the principle or the way he applies  the principle?  I  don't like the term
"perfection" and "imperfection" when
referring to Masculine and Feminine. I
think that, you know, I think that ...
okay that's a duality, but that's not a
very appropriate duality anymore.
Right? [Voice] Well one of them certainly carries a lot more baggage than the other one. Well that's right. [Voice] [Inaudible] One partner's perfect and the other one is imperfect. Excuse me. Well
they're different they bring
different things to the party. Right? [Voice]  There's a bias there, though. What basis do you have for that. [Voice] Imperfection!
Well, let me ask Des. Des how do you feel about
the fact that Dr. Jung is saying that
you are more Feminine than Masculine, and
therefore imperfect? [Voice][Laughter] When you put it like that! [Voice] But she's more Whole.  It almost sounds Freudian.
[Voice] But Des is more Whole than we are.  That's what he's saying, also.  Yeah, but it's not
quite the same, saying that you're. [Voice] Yeah, if its couched like that it's one thing, but it depends on  ...
we know he has layers to his meaning, so I don't take offense, but
Yeah, but ... [Voice] If you're saying you're a lesser being
then; and I don't get that from here.
Well no, but the problem I think is
not you, who've been coming to this Group
for the last year, and therefore familiar
with Dr. Jung, and the way he talks about
things and dualities. But I do worry
about folks out here, who think that. I'm
sorry, but it's not true. Women are not
imperfect! [Voice] But he doesn't say that
men have attained Perfection.  No he doesn't, and
later on he's and we we've said of last
week or a couple weeks ago. You know,
the Paragon of the Universe is not a man.
It's a monster. And so he was referring to
Yahweh. Okay? And Yahweh was a monster. For
71 verses he beats up on Job. Right? Now
if he had used his omniscience, he could
have known that Job was not going to
give up on Him. He did know. Or should
have known it. And, you know, why did he
let Satan whip up on Job anyway?!
Okay, that was pretty imperfect. And
that's the point!
Sophia, with her Wisdom, balances
Yahweh. You know, this Patriarchal
Paragon who's an amoral Force of Nature
monster. [Voice] That's what I'm saying. You're
sort of unknitting his whole thesis
in this book when you make that claim that it's an outmoded idea. It's not an
No it's not an outmoded or
ununiversal idea. I'm saying that the
idea that he's presenting is that
there's Masculine and Feminine in the
universe. I am that's great, okay, Yahweh
and Sophia were there at the beginning.
That's what it says in the Psalms [actually Proverbs 8:12-36]
and when Christ comes along he's
saying that Mary represents this
Feminine aspect of the Hieros Gamos,
which is the combination of Masculine
and Feminine in
the Universe. My only objection is the
use of the terms
"perfect" and "imperfect". Okay? [Voice] So question though:
Didn't he consider that an extreme as well? So not necessarily Perfect equals good. It was an extreme ...
It was an extreme Patriarchy. Right? [Voice] Did he use the word "imperfect" though, I don't think he did. He
did use it. Yeah, in the translation.  I
mean, I don't have the German and I
wouldn't be able to read it, but anyway
let me just read this little bit
of this ¶627... "Thus the more
Feminine ideal is bent in the
direction of the Masculine. In other words
she's Perfectionized, because of her
virginity, etc., and no Original Sin.
So the Feminine ideal is bent
in the direction of the Masculine.
The more the woman loses her power to
compensate the Masculine string for
Perfection, and typically masculine idea
ideal ... typically Masculine ideal state
arises, which as we shall see is
threatened with an enantiodromia."
Now I marked this in red. "No path leads
beyond Perfection into the future." Okay?
So you can't be, you can't have a world
that's totally Masculine and have a
future. Okay? Because without the Feminine
we got no babies. [Voice] In perfection there's no where to go.
There's nowhere to go! Okay.
"There is only a turning back; a collapse
of the ideal, which could easily have
been avoided by paying attention to the
Feminine ideal of Completeness.  Yahweh's
Perfectionism is carried over from the
Old Testament into the New, and despite
all of the recognition and glorification
of the Feminine Principle, this never
prevailed against the Patriarchal
supremacy. We have not
therefore by any means for the last of
it." Okay, so his point is that there's an
enantiodromia and the Feminine side is
going to push back, and that's what we've
been having for the last 150 years since
Susan B. Anthony started her crusade.
Another
In other words, huh? [Voice] And until Trump got here ..
Yeah but Trump Trump Trump is the
"Light Bringer".
Okay, I won't [Voice] Satan? [Laughter] You said earlier Satan is the "Light Bringer". Yeah, I mean, they okay, I
want to be careful here. Trump is making
us see that there are things in the
Psyche of the United States that we need
to pay attention to and fix some how.
you
