VALLOW
VALLOW MOVE
VALLOW MOVE CLOSER
VALLOW MOVE CLOSER TO
VALLOW MOVE CLOSER TO
STANDING
VALLOW MOVE CLOSER TO
STANDING TRIAL
VALLOW MOVE CLOSER TO
STANDING TRIAL IN
VALLOW MOVE CLOSER TO
STANDING TRIAL IN
EASTERN
VALLOW MOVE CLOSER TO
STANDING TRIAL IN
EASTERN IDAHO
VALLOW MOVE CLOSER TO
STANDING TRIAL IN
EASTERN IDAHO --
VALLOW MOVE CLOSER TO
STANDING TRIAL IN
EASTERN IDAHO -- ON
STANDING TRIAL IN
EASTERN IDAHO -- ON
STANDING TRIAL IN
EASTERN IDAHO -- ON
CHARGES
STANDING TRIAL IN
EASTERN IDAHO -- ON
CHARGES THAT
STANDING TRIAL IN
EASTERN IDAHO -- ON
CHARGES THAT SHE
EASTERN IDAHO -- ON
CHARGES THAT SHE
EASTERN IDAHO -- ON
CHARGES THAT SHE
HELPED
EASTERN IDAHO -- ON
CHARGES THAT SHE
HELPED HER
EASTERN IDAHO -- ON
CHARGES THAT SHE
HELPED HER NEW
CHARGES THAT SHE
HELPED HER NEW
CHARGES THAT SHE
HELPED HER NEW
HUSBAND
CHARGES THAT SHE
HELPED HER NEW
HUSBAND CHAD
CHARGES THAT SHE
HELPED HER NEW
HUSBAND CHAD DAYBELL
HELPED HER NEW
HUSBAND CHAD DAYBELL
HELPED HER NEW
HUSBAND CHAD DAYBELL
CONCEAL
HELPED HER NEW
HUSBAND CHAD DAYBELL
CONCEAL THE
HELPED HER NEW
HUSBAND CHAD DAYBELL
CONCEAL THE REMAINS
HUSBAND CHAD DAYBELL
CONCEAL THE REMAINS
HUSBAND CHAD DAYBELL
CONCEAL THE REMAINS
OF
HUSBAND CHAD DAYBELL
CONCEAL THE REMAINS
OF HER
HUSBAND CHAD DAYBELL
CONCEAL THE REMAINS
OF HER CHILDREN,
HUSBAND CHAD DAYBELL
CONCEAL THE REMAINS
OF HER CHILDREN, J-J
CONCEAL THE REMAINS
OF HER CHILDREN, J-J
CONCEAL THE REMAINS
OF HER CHILDREN, J-J
VALLOW
CONCEAL THE REMAINS
OF HER CHILDREN, J-J
VALLOW AND
CONCEAL THE REMAINS
OF HER CHILDREN, J-J
VALLOW AND TYLEE
OF HER CHILDREN, J-J
VALLOW AND TYLEE
OF HER CHILDREN, J-J
VALLOW AND TYLEE
RYAN...
VALLOW AND TYLEE
RYAN...
VALLOW AND TYLEE
RYAN...
TODAY,
VALLOW AND TYLEE
RYAN...
TODAY, WORD
VALLOW AND TYLEE
RYAN...
TODAY, WORD THAT
VALLOW AND TYLEE
RYAN...
TODAY, WORD THAT SHE
RYAN...
TODAY, WORD THAT SHE
RYAN...
TODAY, WORD THAT SHE
COULD
RYAN...
TODAY, WORD THAT SHE
COULD FACE
RYAN...
TODAY, WORD THAT SHE
COULD FACE MORE
TODAY, WORD THAT SHE
COULD FACE MORE
TODAY, WORD THAT SHE
COULD FACE MORE
CHARGES.
COULD FACE MORE
CHARGES.
COULD FACE MORE
CHARGES.
THIS
COULD FACE MORE
CHARGES.
THIS TIME,
COULD FACE MORE
CHARGES.
THIS TIME, IN
CHARGES.
THIS TIME, IN
CHARGES.
THIS TIME, IN
CONNECTION
CHARGES.
THIS TIME, IN
CONNECTION WITH
CHARGES.
THIS TIME, IN
CONNECTION WITH THE
THIS TIME, IN
CONNECTION WITH THE
THIS TIME, IN
CONNECTION WITH THE
DEATH
THIS TIME, IN
CONNECTION WITH THE
DEATH OF
THIS TIME, IN
CONNECTION WITH THE
DEATH OF HER
THIS TIME, IN
CONNECTION WITH THE
DEATH OF HER EX-
CONNECTION WITH THE
DEATH OF HER EX-
CONNECTION WITH THE
DEATH OF HER EX-
HUSBAND
CONNECTION WITH THE
DEATH OF HER EX-
HUSBAND IN
CONNECTION WITH THE
DEATH OF HER EX-
HUSBAND IN ARIZONA.
DEATH OF HER EX-
HUSBAND IN ARIZONA.
DEATH OF HER EX-
HUSBAND IN ARIZONA.
OUR
DEATH OF HER EX-
HUSBAND IN ARIZONA.
OUR SHIRAH
DEATH OF HER EX-
HUSBAND IN ARIZONA.
OUR SHIRAH MATSUZAWA
HUSBAND IN ARIZONA.
OUR SHIRAH MATSUZAWA
HUSBAND IN ARIZONA.
OUR SHIRAH MATSUZAWA
IS
HUSBAND IN ARIZONA.
OUR SHIRAH MATSUZAWA
IS HERE
HUSBAND IN ARIZONA.
OUR SHIRAH MATSUZAWA
IS HERE NOW
HUSBAND IN ARIZONA.
OUR SHIRAH MATSUZAWA
IS HERE NOW TO
HUSBAND IN ARIZONA.
OUR SHIRAH MATSUZAWA
IS HERE NOW TO WALK
HUSBAND IN ARIZONA.
OUR SHIRAH MATSUZAWA
IS HERE NOW TO WALK US
OUR SHIRAH MATSUZAWA
IS HERE NOW TO WALK US
OUR SHIRAH MATSUZAWA
IS HERE NOW TO WALK US
THROUGH
OUR SHIRAH MATSUZAWA
IS HERE NOW TO WALK US
THROUGH THOSE
IS HERE NOW TO WALK US
THROUGH THOSE
IS HERE NOW TO WALK US
THROUGH THOSE
POSSIBLE
IS HERE NOW TO WALK US
THROUGH THOSE
POSSIBLE NEW
IS HERE NOW TO WALK US
THROUGH THOSE
POSSIBLE NEW CHARGES...
THROUGH THOSE
POSSIBLE NEW CHARGES...
THROUGH THOSE
POSSIBLE NEW CHARGES...
SHIRAH.
POSSIBLE NEW CHARGES...
SHIRAH.
POSSIBLE NEW CHARGES...
SHIRAH.
THIS
POSSIBLE NEW CHARGES...
SHIRAH.
THIS IS
POSSIBLE NEW CHARGES...
SHIRAH.
THIS IS A
POSSIBLE NEW CHARGES...
SHIRAH.
THIS IS A COMPLEX
POSSIBLE NEW CHARGES...
SHIRAH.
THIS IS A COMPLEX CASE
SHIRAH.
THIS IS A COMPLEX CASE
SHIRAH.
THIS IS A COMPLEX CASE
WE'VE
SHIRAH.
THIS IS A COMPLEX CASE
WE'VE BEEN
SHIRAH.
THIS IS A COMPLEX CASE
WE'VE BEEN FOLLOWING
THIS IS A COMPLEX CASE
WE'VE BEEN FOLLOWING
THIS IS A COMPLEX CASE
WE'VE BEEN FOLLOWING
SINCE
THIS IS A COMPLEX CASE
WE'VE BEEN FOLLOWING
SINCE LAST
THIS IS A COMPLEX CASE
WE'VE BEEN FOLLOWING
SINCE LAST YEAR...WHEN
WE'VE BEEN FOLLOWING
SINCE LAST YEAR...WHEN
SINCE LAST YEAR...WHEN
THE
THE CHILDREN
THE CHILDREN WERE
THE CHILDREN WERE FIRST
THE CHILDREN WERE FIRST
REPORTED
THE CHILDREN WERE FIRST
REPORTED MISSING.
THE CHILDREN WERE FIRST
REPORTED MISSING.
AND
THE CHILDREN WERE FIRST
REPORTED MISSING.
AND IT'S
THE CHILDREN WERE FIRST
REPORTED MISSING.
AND IT'S A
THE CHILDREN WERE FIRST
REPORTED MISSING.
AND IT'S A CASE
THE CHILDREN WERE FIRST
REPORTED MISSING.
AND IT'S A CASE THAT
REPORTED MISSING.
AND IT'S A CASE THAT
REPORTED MISSING.
AND IT'S A CASE THAT
SPANS
REPORTED MISSING.
AND IT'S A CASE THAT
SPANS MULTIPLE
REPORTED MISSING.
AND IT'S A CASE THAT
SPANS MULTIPLE STATES...
AND IT'S A CASE THAT
SPANS MULTIPLE STATES...
AND IT'S A CASE THAT
SPANS MULTIPLE STATES...
WHICH
AND IT'S A CASE THAT
SPANS MULTIPLE STATES...
WHICH MEANS
AND IT'S A CASE THAT
SPANS MULTIPLE STATES...
WHICH MEANS MULTPLE
SPANS MULTIPLE STATES...
WHICH MEANS MULTPLE
SPANS MULTIPLE STATES...
WHICH MEANS MULTPLE
INVESTIGATIONS..
WHICH MEANS MULTPLE
INVESTIGATIONS..
WHICH MEANS MULTPLE
INVESTIGATIONS..
ARIZONA
WHICH MEANS MULTPLE
INVESTIGATIONS..
ARIZONA POLICE
WHICH MEANS MULTPLE
INVESTIGATIONS..
ARIZONA POLICE ARE
INVESTIGATIONS..
ARIZONA POLICE ARE
INVESTIGATIONS..
ARIZONA POLICE ARE
NOW
INVESTIGATIONS..
ARIZONA POLICE ARE
NOW LOOKING
INVESTIGATIONS..
ARIZONA POLICE ARE
NOW LOOKING INTO
ARIZONA POLICE ARE
NOW LOOKING INTO
ARIZONA POLICE ARE
NOW LOOKING INTO
CHARGING
ARIZONA POLICE ARE
NOW LOOKING INTO
CHARGING LORI
ARIZONA POLICE ARE
NOW LOOKING INTO
CHARGING LORI VALLOW
NOW LOOKING INTO
CHARGING LORI VALLOW
NOW LOOKING INTO
CHARGING LORI VALLOW
DAYBELL
NOW LOOKING INTO
CHARGING LORI VALLOW
DAYBELL IN
NOW LOOKING INTO
CHARGING LORI VALLOW
DAYBELL IN CONNECTION
CHARGING LORI VALLOW
DAYBELL IN CONNECTION
CHARGING LORI VALLOW
DAYBELL IN CONNECTION
WITH
CHARGING LORI VALLOW
DAYBELL IN CONNECTION
WITH THE
CHARGING LORI VALLOW
DAYBELL IN CONNECTION
WITH THE DEATH
CHARGING LORI VALLOW
DAYBELL IN CONNECTION
WITH THE DEATH OF
CHARGING LORI VALLOW
DAYBELL IN CONNECTION
WITH THE DEATH OF HER
DAYBELL IN CONNECTION
WITH THE DEATH OF HER
DAYBELL IN CONNECTION
WITH THE DEATH OF HER
EX-HUSBAND
DAYBELL IN CONNECTION
WITH THE DEATH OF HER
EX-HUSBAND CHARLES
WITH THE DEATH OF HER
EX-HUSBAND CHARLES
WITH THE DEATH OF HER
EX-HUSBAND CHARLES
VALLOW.
EX-HUSBAND CHARLES
VALLOW.
EX-HUSBAND CHARLES
VALLOW.
THIS
EX-HUSBAND CHARLES
VALLOW.
THIS IS
EX-HUSBAND CHARLES
VALLOW.
THIS IS BODY
EX-HUSBAND CHARLES
VALLOW.
THIS IS BODY CAMERA
VALLOW.
THIS IS BODY CAMERA
VALLOW.
THIS IS BODY CAMERA
FOOTAGE
VALLOW.
THIS IS BODY CAMERA
FOOTAGE FOLLOWING
VALLOW.
THIS IS BODY CAMERA
FOOTAGE FOLLOWING HIS
THIS IS BODY CAMERA
FOOTAGE FOLLOWING HIS
THIS IS BODY CAMERA
FOOTAGE FOLLOWING HIS
DEATH.
FOOTAGE FOLLOWING HIS
DEATH.
FOOTAGE FOLLOWING HIS
DEATH.
IN
FOOTAGE FOLLOWING HIS
DEATH.
IN A
FOOTAGE FOLLOWING HIS
DEATH.
IN A STATEMENT
FOOTAGE FOLLOWING HIS
DEATH.
IN A STATEMENT GIVEN
DEATH.
IN A STATEMENT GIVEN
DEATH.
IN A STATEMENT GIVEN
TO
DEATH.
IN A STATEMENT GIVEN
TO OUR
DEATH.
IN A STATEMENT GIVEN
TO OUR SISTER
DEATH.
IN A STATEMENT GIVEN
TO OUR SISTER STATION
DEATH.
IN A STATEMENT GIVEN
TO OUR SISTER STATION IN
IN A STATEMENT GIVEN
TO OUR SISTER STATION IN
IN A STATEMENT GIVEN
TO OUR SISTER STATION IN
PHOENIX--K-P-N-X..
TO OUR SISTER STATION IN
PHOENIX--K-P-N-X..
TO OUR SISTER STATION IN
PHOENIX--K-P-N-X..
CHANDLER
TO OUR SISTER STATION IN
PHOENIX--K-P-N-X..
CHANDLER POLICE
PHOENIX--K-P-N-X..
CHANDLER POLICE
PHOENIX--K-P-N-X..
CHANDLER POLICE
SAY...THOSE
PHOENIX--K-P-N-X..
CHANDLER POLICE
SAY...THOSE CHARGES
CHANDLER POLICE
SAY...THOSE CHARGES
CHANDLER POLICE
SAY...THOSE CHARGES
COULD
CHANDLER POLICE
SAY...THOSE CHARGES
COULD COME
CHANDLER POLICE
SAY...THOSE CHARGES
COULD COME DOWN
CHANDLER POLICE
SAY...THOSE CHARGES
COULD COME DOWN AS
SAY...THOSE CHARGES
COULD COME DOWN AS
SAY...THOSE CHARGES
COULD COME DOWN AS
EARLY
SAY...THOSE CHARGES
COULD COME DOWN AS
EARLY AS
SAY...THOSE CHARGES
COULD COME DOWN AS
EARLY AS DECEMBER...
SAY...THOSE CHARGES
COULD COME DOWN AS
EARLY AS DECEMBER... BUT
COULD COME DOWN AS
EARLY AS DECEMBER... BUT
COULD COME DOWN AS
EARLY AS DECEMBER... BUT
THERE
COULD COME DOWN AS
EARLY AS DECEMBER... BUT
THERE IS
COULD COME DOWN AS
EARLY AS DECEMBER... BUT
THERE IS NO
COULD COME DOWN AS
EARLY AS DECEMBER... BUT
THERE IS NO EXACT
COULD COME DOWN AS
EARLY AS DECEMBER... BUT
THERE IS NO EXACT DATE
EARLY AS DECEMBER... BUT
THERE IS NO EXACT DATE
EARLY AS DECEMBER... BUT
THERE IS NO EXACT DATE
OR
EARLY AS DECEMBER... BUT
THERE IS NO EXACT DATE
OR TIMELINE
EARLY AS DECEMBER... BUT
THERE IS NO EXACT DATE
OR TIMELINE AT
EARLY AS DECEMBER... BUT
THERE IS NO EXACT DATE
OR TIMELINE AT THIS
EARLY AS DECEMBER... BUT
THERE IS NO EXACT DATE
OR TIMELINE AT THIS TIME.
THERE IS NO EXACT DATE
OR TIMELINE AT THIS TIME.
THERE IS NO EXACT DATE
OR TIMELINE AT THIS TIME.
THEY
THERE IS NO EXACT DATE
OR TIMELINE AT THIS TIME.
THEY ADD,
THERE IS NO EXACT DATE
OR TIMELINE AT THIS TIME.
THEY ADD, IF
THERE IS NO EXACT DATE
OR TIMELINE AT THIS TIME.
THEY ADD, IF AND
THERE IS NO EXACT DATE
OR TIMELINE AT THIS TIME.
THEY ADD, IF AND WHEN
OR TIMELINE AT THIS TIME.
THEY ADD, IF AND WHEN
OR TIMELINE AT THIS TIME.
THEY ADD, IF AND WHEN
THOSE
OR TIMELINE AT THIS TIME.
THEY ADD, IF AND WHEN
THOSE CHARGES
OR TIMELINE AT THIS TIME.
THEY ADD, IF AND WHEN
THOSE CHARGES COME
THEY ADD, IF AND WHEN
THOSE CHARGES COME
THOSE CHARGES COME
DOWN...
DOWN... ONE
DOWN... ONE WILL
DOWN... ONE WILL BE
DOWN... ONE WILL BE
CONSPIRACY
DOWN... ONE WILL BE
CONSPIRACY TO
DOWN... ONE WILL BE
CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT
DOWN... ONE WILL BE
CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT
MURDER.
CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT
MURDER.
CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT
MURDER.
MAYBE
CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT
MURDER.
MAYBE ANOTHER
CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT
MURDER.
MAYBE ANOTHER NAT?
MURDER.
MAYBE ANOTHER NAT?
MURDER.
MAYBE ANOTHER NAT?
AS
MURDER.
MAYBE ANOTHER NAT?
AS WE'VE
MURDER.
MAYBE ANOTHER NAT?
AS WE'VE REPORTED...
MAYBE ANOTHER NAT?
AS WE'VE REPORTED...
MAYBE ANOTHER NAT?
AS WE'VE REPORTED...
LORI'S
MAYBE ANOTHER NAT?
AS WE'VE REPORTED...
LORI'S BROTHER--ALEX
AS WE'VE REPORTED...
LORI'S BROTHER--ALEX
AS WE'VE REPORTED...
LORI'S BROTHER--ALEX
COX
AS WE'VE REPORTED...
LORI'S BROTHER--ALEX
COX --
AS WE'VE REPORTED...
LORI'S BROTHER--ALEX
COX -- SHOT
AS WE'VE REPORTED...
LORI'S BROTHER--ALEX
COX -- SHOT AND
AS WE'VE REPORTED...
LORI'S BROTHER--ALEX
COX -- SHOT AND KILLED
LORI'S BROTHER--ALEX
COX -- SHOT AND KILLED
LORI'S BROTHER--ALEX
COX -- SHOT AND KILLED
HIS
LORI'S BROTHER--ALEX
COX -- SHOT AND KILLED
HIS SISTER'S
LORI'S BROTHER--ALEX
COX -- SHOT AND KILLED
HIS SISTER'S HUSBAND
COX -- SHOT AND KILLED
HIS SISTER'S HUSBAND
COX -- SHOT AND KILLED
HIS SISTER'S HUSBAND
LAST
COX -- SHOT AND KILLED
HIS SISTER'S HUSBAND
LAST JULY.
HIS SISTER'S HUSBAND
LAST JULY.
HIS SISTER'S HUSBAND
LAST JULY.
COX
HIS SISTER'S HUSBAND
LAST JULY.
COX CLAIMS
HIS SISTER'S HUSBAND
LAST JULY.
COX CLAIMS IT
HIS SISTER'S HUSBAND
LAST JULY.
COX CLAIMS IT WAS
HIS SISTER'S HUSBAND
LAST JULY.
COX CLAIMS IT WAS IN
LAST JULY.
COX CLAIMS IT WAS IN
LAST JULY.
COX CLAIMS IT WAS IN
SELF-DEFENSE.
COX CLAIMS IT WAS IN
SELF-DEFENSE.
COX CLAIMS IT WAS IN
SELF-DEFENSE.
HE
COX CLAIMS IT WAS IN
SELF-DEFENSE.
HE THEN
COX CLAIMS IT WAS IN
SELF-DEFENSE.
HE THEN DIED
COX CLAIMS IT WAS IN
SELF-DEFENSE.
HE THEN DIED OF
SELF-DEFENSE.
HE THEN DIED OF
SELF-DEFENSE.
HE THEN DIED OF
NATURAL
SELF-DEFENSE.
HE THEN DIED OF
NATURAL CAUSES
HE THEN DIED OF
NATURAL CAUSES
HE THEN DIED OF
NATURAL CAUSES
MONTHS
HE THEN DIED OF
NATURAL CAUSES
MONTHS LATER.
NATURAL CAUSES
MONTHS LATER.
NATURAL CAUSES
MONTHS LATER.
BUT
NATURAL CAUSES
MONTHS LATER.
BUT ACCORDING
NATURAL CAUSES
MONTHS LATER.
BUT ACCORDING TO
NATURAL CAUSES
MONTHS LATER.
BUT ACCORDING TO THE
MONTHS LATER.
BUT ACCORDING TO THE
MONTHS LATER.
BUT ACCORDING TO THE
STATEMENT
MONTHS LATER.
BUT ACCORDING TO THE
STATEMENT FROM
BUT ACCORDING TO THE
STATEMENT FROM
BUT ACCORDING TO THE
STATEMENT FROM
CHANDLER
BUT ACCORDING TO THE
STATEMENT FROM
CHANDLER POLICE...
BUT ACCORDING TO THE
STATEMENT FROM
CHANDLER POLICE... LORI
STATEMENT FROM
CHANDLER POLICE... LORI
STATEMENT FROM
CHANDLER POLICE... LORI
HAS
STATEMENT FROM
CHANDLER POLICE... LORI
HAS ALWAYS
STATEMENT FROM
CHANDLER POLICE... LORI
HAS ALWAYS BEEN
STATEMENT FROM
CHANDLER POLICE... LORI
HAS ALWAYS BEEN A
CHANDLER POLICE... LORI
HAS ALWAYS BEEN A
CHANDLER POLICE... LORI
HAS ALWAYS BEEN A
PERSON
CHANDLER POLICE... LORI
HAS ALWAYS BEEN A
PERSON OF
CHANDLER POLICE... LORI
HAS ALWAYS BEEN A
PERSON OF INTEREST
CHANDLER POLICE... LORI
HAS ALWAYS BEEN A
PERSON OF INTEREST IN
HAS ALWAYS BEEN A
PERSON OF INTEREST IN
HAS ALWAYS BEEN A
PERSON OF INTEREST IN
THIS
HAS ALWAYS BEEN A
PERSON OF INTEREST IN
THIS INVESTIGATION.
PERSON OF INTEREST IN
THIS INVESTIGATION.
PERSON OF INTEREST IN
THIS INVESTIGATION.
IT
PERSON OF INTEREST IN
THIS INVESTIGATION.
IT GOES
PERSON OF INTEREST IN
THIS INVESTIGATION.
IT GOES ON
PERSON OF INTEREST IN
THIS INVESTIGATION.
IT GOES ON TO
PERSON OF INTEREST IN
THIS INVESTIGATION.
IT GOES ON TO SAY...
THIS INVESTIGATION.
IT GOES ON TO SAY...
THIS INVESTIGATION.
IT GOES ON TO SAY...
DETECTIVES
THIS INVESTIGATION.
IT GOES ON TO SAY...
DETECTIVES ARE
THIS INVESTIGATION.
IT GOES ON TO SAY...
DETECTIVES ARE IN
THIS INVESTIGATION.
IT GOES ON TO SAY...
DETECTIVES ARE IN NO
IT GOES ON TO SAY...
DETECTIVES ARE IN NO
IT GOES ON TO SAY...
DETECTIVES ARE IN NO
RUSH
IT GOES ON TO SAY...
DETECTIVES ARE IN NO
RUSH AT
IT GOES ON TO SAY...
DETECTIVES ARE IN NO
RUSH AT THIS
IT GOES ON TO SAY...
DETECTIVES ARE IN NO
RUSH AT THIS TIME.
DETECTIVES ARE IN NO
RUSH AT THIS TIME.
DETECTIVES ARE IN NO
RUSH AT THIS TIME.
AND
DETECTIVES ARE IN NO
RUSH AT THIS TIME.
AND ARE
DETECTIVES ARE IN NO
RUSH AT THIS TIME.
AND ARE STILL
DETECTIVES ARE IN NO
RUSH AT THIS TIME.
AND ARE STILL GOING
RUSH AT THIS TIME.
AND ARE STILL GOING
RUSH AT THIS TIME.
AND ARE STILL GOING
THROUGH
RUSH AT THIS TIME.
AND ARE STILL GOING
THROUGH MORE
RUSH AT THIS TIME.
AND ARE STILL GOING
THROUGH MORE THAN
AND ARE STILL GOING
THROUGH MORE THAN
AND ARE STILL GOING
THROUGH MORE THAN
100-THOUSAND
AND ARE STILL GOING
THROUGH MORE THAN
100-THOUSAND PIECES
AND ARE STILL GOING
THROUGH MORE THAN
100-THOUSAND PIECES OF
THROUGH MORE THAN
100-THOUSAND PIECES OF
THROUGH MORE THAN
100-THOUSAND PIECES OF
DIGITAL
THROUGH MORE THAN
100-THOUSAND PIECES OF
DIGITAL DATA.
100-THOUSAND PIECES OF
DIGITAL DATA.
100-THOUSAND PIECES OF
DIGITAL DATA.
MEANWHILE
100-THOUSAND PIECES OF
DIGITAL DATA.
MEANWHILE --
100-THOUSAND PIECES OF
DIGITAL DATA.
MEANWHILE -- BOTH
100-THOUSAND PIECES OF
DIGITAL DATA.
MEANWHILE -- BOTH LORI
DIGITAL DATA.
MEANWHILE -- BOTH LORI
DIGITAL DATA.
MEANWHILE -- BOTH LORI
AND
DIGITAL DATA.
MEANWHILE -- BOTH LORI
AND HER
DIGITAL DATA.
MEANWHILE -- BOTH LORI
AND HER NEW
DIGITAL DATA.
MEANWHILE -- BOTH LORI
AND HER NEW HUSBAND
MEANWHILE -- BOTH LORI
AND HER NEW HUSBAND
MEANWHILE -- BOTH LORI
AND HER NEW HUSBAND
--
MEANWHILE -- BOTH LORI
AND HER NEW HUSBAND
-- CHAD
MEANWHILE -- BOTH LORI
AND HER NEW HUSBAND
-- CHAD DAYBELL
MEANWHILE -- BOTH LORI
AND HER NEW HUSBAND
-- CHAD DAYBELL REMAIN
AND HER NEW HUSBAND
-- CHAD DAYBELL REMAIN
AND HER NEW HUSBAND
-- CHAD DAYBELL REMAIN
IN
AND HER NEW HUSBAND
-- CHAD DAYBELL REMAIN
IN JAIL
AND HER NEW HUSBAND
-- CHAD DAYBELL REMAIN
IN JAIL IN
AND HER NEW HUSBAND
-- CHAD DAYBELL REMAIN
IN JAIL IN CONNECTION
-- CHAD DAYBELL REMAIN
IN JAIL IN CONNECTION
-- CHAD DAYBELL REMAIN
IN JAIL IN CONNECTION
WITH
-- CHAD DAYBELL REMAIN
IN JAIL IN CONNECTION
WITH THIS
-- CHAD DAYBELL REMAIN
IN JAIL IN CONNECTION
WITH THIS CASE.
IN JAIL IN CONNECTION
WITH THIS CASE.
IN JAIL IN CONNECTION
WITH THIS CASE.
THEY
IN JAIL IN CONNECTION
WITH THIS CASE.
THEY FACE
IN JAIL IN CONNECTION
WITH THIS CASE.
THEY FACE CHARGES
IN JAIL IN CONNECTION
WITH THIS CASE.
THEY FACE CHARGES OF
WITH THIS CASE.
THEY FACE CHARGES OF
WITH THIS CASE.
THEY FACE CHARGES OF
CONSPIRACY
WITH THIS CASE.
THEY FACE CHARGES OF
CONSPIRACY AND
THEY FACE CHARGES OF
CONSPIRACY AND
THEY FACE CHARGES OF
CONSPIRACY AND
CONCEALING
THEY FACE CHARGES OF
CONSPIRACY AND
CONCEALING OR
CONSPIRACY AND
CONCEALING OR
CONSPIRACY AND
CONCEALING OR
DESTROYING
CONSPIRACY AND
CONCEALING OR
DESTROYING EVIDENCE
CONCEALING OR
DESTROYING EVIDENCE
CONCEALING OR
DESTROYING EVIDENCE
NEITHER
CONCEALING OR
DESTROYING EVIDENCE
NEITHER HAVE
CONCEALING OR
DESTROYING EVIDENCE
NEITHER HAVE BEEN
DESTROYING EVIDENCE
NEITHER HAVE BEEN
DESTROYING EVIDENCE
NEITHER HAVE BEEN
CHARGED
DESTROYING EVIDENCE
NEITHER HAVE BEEN
CHARGED WITH
DESTROYING EVIDENCE
NEITHER HAVE BEEN
CHARGED WITH KILLING
NEITHER HAVE BEEN
CHARGED WITH KILLING
NEITHER HAVE BEEN
CHARGED WITH KILLING
LORI'S
NEITHER HAVE BEEN
CHARGED WITH KILLING
LORI'S CHILDREN.
CHARGED WITH KILLING
LORI'S CHILDREN.
CHARGED WITH KILLING
LORI'S CHILDREN.
AND
CHARGED WITH KILLING
LORI'S CHILDREN.
AND EARLIER
CHARGED WITH KILLING
LORI'S CHILDREN.
AND EARLIER THIS
CHARGED WITH KILLING
LORI'S CHILDREN.
AND EARLIER THIS WEEK...
LORI'S CHILDREN.
AND EARLIER THIS WEEK...
LORI'S CHILDREN.
AND EARLIER THIS WEEK...
A
LORI'S CHILDREN.
AND EARLIER THIS WEEK...
A JUDGE
LORI'S CHILDREN.
AND EARLIER THIS WEEK...
A JUDGE RULED
LORI'S CHILDREN.
AND EARLIER THIS WEEK...
A JUDGE RULED ...
LORI'S CHILDREN.
AND EARLIER THIS WEEK...
A JUDGE RULED ... THERE
LORI'S CHILDREN.
AND EARLIER THIS WEEK...
A JUDGE RULED ... THERE IS
AND EARLIER THIS WEEK...
A JUDGE RULED ... THERE IS
AND EARLIER THIS WEEK...
A JUDGE RULED ... THERE IS
ENOUGH
AND EARLIER THIS WEEK...
A JUDGE RULED ... THERE IS
ENOUGH EVIDENCE
AND EARLIER THIS WEEK...
A JUDGE RULED ... THERE IS
ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO
A JUDGE RULED ... THERE IS
ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO
A JUDGE RULED ... THERE IS
ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO
MOVE
A JUDGE RULED ... THERE IS
ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO
MOVE DAYBELL'S
A JUDGE RULED ... THERE IS
ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO
MOVE DAYBELL'S CASE
ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO
MOVE DAYBELL'S CASE
ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO
MOVE DAYBELL'S CASE
FORWARD.
MOVE DAYBELL'S CASE
FORWARD.
MOVE DAYBELL'S CASE
FORWARD.
THE
MOVE DAYBELL'S CASE
FORWARD.
THE COURT
MOVE DAYBELL'S CASE
FORWARD.
THE COURT FINDS
MOVE DAYBELL'S CASE
FORWARD.
THE COURT FINDS THE
FORWARD.
THE COURT FINDS THE
FORWARD.
THE COURT FINDS THE
STATE
FORWARD.
THE COURT FINDS THE
STATE HAS
FORWARD.
THE COURT FINDS THE
STATE HAS MET
FORWARD.
THE COURT FINDS THE
STATE HAS MET ITS
THE COURT FINDS THE
STATE HAS MET ITS
THE COURT FINDS THE
STATE HAS MET ITS
BURDEN
THE COURT FINDS THE
STATE HAS MET ITS
BURDEN OF
THE COURT FINDS THE
STATE HAS MET ITS
BURDEN OF PROBABLE
STATE HAS MET ITS
BURDEN OF PROBABLE
STATE HAS MET ITS
BURDEN OF PROBABLE
CAUSE
STATE HAS MET ITS
BURDEN OF PROBABLE
CAUSE AND
STATE HAS MET ITS
BURDEN OF PROBABLE
CAUSE AND I
STATE HAS MET ITS
BURDEN OF PROBABLE
CAUSE AND I FIND
STATE HAS MET ITS
BURDEN OF PROBABLE
CAUSE AND I FIND THERE
BURDEN OF PROBABLE
CAUSE AND I FIND THERE
BURDEN OF PROBABLE
CAUSE AND I FIND THERE
IS
BURDEN OF PROBABLE
CAUSE AND I FIND THERE
IS PROBABLE
BURDEN OF PROBABLE
CAUSE AND I FIND THERE
IS PROBABLE OR
CAUSE AND I FIND THERE
IS PROBABLE OR
CAUSE AND I FIND THERE
IS PROBABLE OR
SUFFICIENT
CAUSE AND I FIND THERE
IS PROBABLE OR
SUFFICIENT CAUSE
CAUSE AND I FIND THERE
IS PROBABLE OR
SUFFICIENT CAUSE TO
IS PROBABLE OR
SUFFICIENT CAUSE TO
IS PROBABLE OR
SUFFICIENT CAUSE TO
BELIEVE
IS PROBABLE OR
SUFFICIENT CAUSE TO
BELIEVE THE
IS PROBABLE OR
SUFFICIENT CAUSE TO
BELIEVE THE DEFENDANT,
SUFFICIENT CAUSE TO
BELIEVE THE DEFENDANT,
SUFFICIENT CAUSE TO
BELIEVE THE DEFENDANT,
CHAD
SUFFICIENT CAUSE TO
BELIEVE THE DEFENDANT,
CHAD DAYBELL,
BELIEVE THE DEFENDANT,
CHAD DAYBELL,
BELIEVE THE DEFENDANT,
CHAD DAYBELL,
COMMITTED
BELIEVE THE DEFENDANT,
CHAD DAYBELL,
COMMITTED THE
CHAD DAYBELL,
COMMITTED THE
CHAD DAYBELL,
COMMITTED THE
OFFENSES
CHAD DAYBELL,
COMMITTED THE
OFFENSES COUNTS
CHAD DAYBELL,
COMMITTED THE
OFFENSES COUNTS 1
COMMITTED THE
OFFENSES COUNTS 1
COMMITTED THE
OFFENSES COUNTS 1
THROUGH
COMMITTED THE
OFFENSES COUNTS 1
THROUGH 4
COMMITTED THE
OFFENSES COUNTS 1
THROUGH 4 AS
OFFENSES COUNTS 1
THROUGH 4 AS
OFFENSES COUNTS 1
THROUGH 4 AS
DESIGNATED
OFFENSES COUNTS 1
THROUGH 4 AS
DESIGNATED BY
OFFENSES COUNTS 1
THROUGH 4 AS
DESIGNATED BY IN
OFFENSES COUNTS 1
THROUGH 4 AS
DESIGNATED BY IN THE
THROUGH 4 AS
DESIGNATED BY IN THE
THROUGH 4 AS
DESIGNATED BY IN THE
AMENDED
THROUGH 4 AS
DESIGNATED BY IN THE
AMENDED CRIMINAL
DESIGNATED BY IN THE
AMENDED CRIMINAL
DESIGNATED BY IN THE
AMENDED CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT.
DESIGNATED BY IN THE
AMENDED CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT. I
DESIGNATED BY IN THE
AMENDED CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT. I WILL
DESIGNATED BY IN THE
AMENDED CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT. I WILL BIND
AMENDED CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT. I WILL BIND
AMENDED CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT. I WILL BIND
THE
AMENDED CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT. I WILL BIND
THE DEFENDANT
AMENDED CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT. I WILL BIND
THE DEFENDANT OVER
AMENDED CRIMINAL
COMPLAINT. I WILL BIND
THE DEFENDANT OVER TO
COMPLAINT. I WILL BIND
THE DEFENDANT OVER TO
COMPLAINT. I WILL BIND
THE DEFENDANT OVER TO
DISTRICT
COMPLAINT. I WILL BIND
THE DEFENDANT OVER TO
DISTRICT COURT."
THE DEFENDANT OVER TO
DISTRICT COURT."
THE DEFENDANT OVER TO
DISTRICT COURT."
DAYBELL
THE DEFENDANT OVER TO
DISTRICT COURT."
DAYBELL WILL
THE DEFENDANT OVER TO
DISTRICT COURT."
DAYBELL WILL BE
THE DEFENDANT OVER TO
DISTRICT COURT."
DAYBELL WILL BE BACK
THE DEFENDANT OVER TO
DISTRICT COURT."
DAYBELL WILL BE BACK IN
DISTRICT COURT."
DAYBELL WILL BE BACK IN
DISTRICT COURT."
DAYBELL WILL BE BACK IN
COURT
DISTRICT COURT."
DAYBELL WILL BE BACK IN
COURT FOR
DISTRICT COURT."
DAYBELL WILL BE BACK IN
COURT FOR AN
DAYBELL WILL BE BACK IN
COURT FOR AN
DAYBELL WILL BE BACK IN
COURT FOR AN
ARRAIGNMENT
DAYBELL WILL BE BACK IN
COURT FOR AN
ARRAIGNMENT ON
COURT FOR AN
ARRAIGNMENT ON
COURT FOR AN
ARRAIGNMENT ON
AUGUST
COURT FOR AN
ARRAIGNMENT ON
AUGUST 21ST
ARRAIGNMENT ON
AUGUST 21ST
ARRAIGNMENT ON
AUGUST 21ST
MEANTIME...
ARRAIGNMENT ON
AUGUST 21ST
MEANTIME... LORI
ARRAIGNMENT ON
AUGUST 21ST
MEANTIME... LORI WAIVED
AUGUST 21ST
MEANTIME... LORI WAIVED
AUGUST 21ST
MEANTIME... LORI WAIVED
HER
AUGUST 21ST
MEANTIME... LORI WAIVED
HER RIGHT
AUGUST 21ST
MEANTIME... LORI WAIVED
HER RIGHT TO
AUGUST 21ST
MEANTIME... LORI WAIVED
HER RIGHT TO A
MEANTIME... LORI WAIVED
HER RIGHT TO A
MEANTIME... LORI WAIVED
HER RIGHT TO A
PRELIMINARY
MEANTIME... LORI WAIVED
HER RIGHT TO A
PRELIMINARY HEARING
HER RIGHT TO A
PRELIMINARY HEARING
HER RIGHT TO A
PRELIMINARY HEARING
ON
HER RIGHT TO A
PRELIMINARY HEARING
ON THURSDAY.
PRELIMINARY HEARING
ON THURSDAY.
PRELIMINARY HEARING
ON THURSDAY.
WHICH
PRELIMINARY HEARING
ON THURSDAY.
WHICH MEANS
PRELIMINARY HEARING
ON THURSDAY.
WHICH MEANS HER
PRELIMINARY HEARING
ON THURSDAY.
WHICH MEANS HER CASE
ON THURSDAY.
WHICH MEANS HER CASE
ON THURSDAY.
WHICH MEANS HER CASE
WILL
ON THURSDAY.
WHICH MEANS HER CASE
WILL NOW
ON THURSDAY.
WHICH MEANS HER CASE
WILL NOW GO
ON THURSDAY.
WHICH MEANS HER CASE
WILL NOW GO STRAIGHT
WHICH MEANS HER CASE
WILL NOW GO STRAIGHT
WHICH MEANS HER CASE
WILL NOW GO STRAIGHT
TO
WHICH MEANS HER CASE
WILL NOW GO STRAIGHT
TO TRIAL.
WILL NOW GO STRAIGHT
TO TRIAL.
WILL NOW GO STRAIGHT
TO TRIAL.
NO
WILL NOW GO STRAIGHT
TO TRIAL.
NO WORD
WILL NOW GO STRAIGHT
TO TRIAL.
NO WORD YET
WILL NOW GO STRAIGHT
TO TRIAL.
NO WORD YET ON
WILL NOW GO STRAIGHT
TO TRIAL.
NO WORD YET ON WHEN
TO TRIAL.
NO WORD YET ON WHEN
TO TRIAL.
NO WORD YET ON WHEN
SHE
TO TRIAL.
NO WORD YET ON WHEN
SHE WILL
TO TRIAL.
NO WORD YET ON WHEN
SHE WILL BE
TO TRIAL.
NO WORD YET ON WHEN
SHE WILL BE BACK
TO TRIAL.
NO WORD YET ON WHEN
SHE WILL BE BACK IN
NO WORD YET ON WHEN
SHE WILL BE BACK IN
NO WORD YET ON WHEN
SHE WILL BE BACK IN
COURT.
SHE WILL BE BACK IN
COURT.
COURT.
NO
NO WORD
NO WORD YET
NO WORD YET ON
NO WORD YET ON WHEN
NO WORD YET ON WHEN
SHE
NO WORD YET ON WHEN
SHE WILL
NO WORD YET ON WHEN
SHE WILL BE
NO WORD YET ON WHEN
SHE WILL BE BACK
NO WORD YET ON WHEN
SHE WILL BE BACK IN
NO WORD YET ON WHEN
SHE WILL BE BACK IN
COURT.
SHE WILL BE BACK IN
COURT.
SHE WILL BE BACK IN
COURT.
AGAIN,
SHE WILL BE BACK IN
COURT.
AGAIN, THERE
SHE WILL BE BACK IN
COURT.
AGAIN, THERE IS
SHE WILL BE BACK IN
COURT.
AGAIN, THERE IS NO
COURT.
AGAIN, THERE IS NO
COURT.
AGAIN, THERE IS NO
EXACT
COURT.
AGAIN, THERE IS NO
EXACT DATE
COURT.
AGAIN, THERE IS NO
EXACT DATE FOR
COURT.
AGAIN, THERE IS NO
EXACT DATE FOR WHEN
AGAIN, THERE IS NO
EXACT DATE FOR WHEN
AGAIN, THERE IS NO
EXACT DATE FOR WHEN
THOSE
AGAIN, THERE IS NO
EXACT DATE FOR WHEN
THOSE NEW
AGAIN, THERE IS NO
EXACT DATE FOR WHEN
THOSE NEW POSSIBLE
EXACT DATE FOR WHEN
THOSE NEW POSSIBLE
EXACT DATE FOR WHEN
THOSE NEW POSSIBLE
CHARGES
EXACT DATE FOR WHEN
THOSE NEW POSSIBLE
CHARGES COULD
EXACT DATE FOR WHEN
THOSE NEW POSSIBLE
CHARGES COULD HAPPEN
THOSE NEW POSSIBLE
CHARGES COULD HAPPEN
THOSE NEW POSSIBLE
CHARGES COULD HAPPEN
IN
THOSE NEW POSSIBLE
CHARGES COULD HAPPEN
IN RELATION
THOSE NEW POSSIBLE
CHARGES COULD HAPPEN
IN RELATION TO
THOSE NEW POSSIBLE
CHARGES COULD HAPPEN
IN RELATION TO CHARLES
CHARGES COULD HAPPEN
IN RELATION TO CHARLES
CHARGES COULD HAPPEN
IN RELATION TO CHARLES
VALLOW'S
CHARGES COULD HAPPEN
IN RELATION TO CHARLES
VALLOW'S DEATH.
IN RELATION TO CHARLES
VALLOW'S DEATH.
IN RELATION TO CHARLES
VALLOW'S DEATH.
BUT
IN RELATION TO CHARLES
VALLOW'S DEATH.
BUT CHANDLER
IN RELATION TO CHARLES
VALLOW'S DEATH.
BUT CHANDLER POLICE
VALLOW'S DEATH.
BUT CHANDLER POLICE
VALLOW'S DEATH.
BUT CHANDLER POLICE
SAY..
VALLOW'S DEATH.
BUT CHANDLER POLICE
SAY.. THEY'RE
VALLOW'S DEATH.
BUT CHANDLER POLICE
SAY.. THEY'RE ESTIMATING
BUT CHANDLER POLICE
SAY.. THEY'RE ESTIMATING
BUT CHANDLER POLICE
SAY.. THEY'RE ESTIMATING
BETWEEN
BUT CHANDLER POLICE
SAY.. THEY'RE ESTIMATING
BETWEEN 4-AND
BUT CHANDLER POLICE
SAY.. THEY'RE ESTIMATING
BETWEEN 4-AND -6
SAY.. THEY'RE ESTIMATING
BETWEEN 4-AND -6
SAY.. THEY'RE ESTIMATING
BETWEEN 4-AND -6
MONTHS.
BETWEEN 4-AND -6
MONTHS.
BETWEEN 4-AND -6
MONTHS.
MEANTIME...
BETWEEN 4-AND -6
MONTHS.
MEANTIME... I
BETWEEN 4-AND -6
MONTHS.
MEANTIME... I CHECKED
MONTHS.
MEANTIME... I CHECKED
MONTHS.
MEANTIME... I CHECKED
IN
MONTHS.
MEANTIME... I CHECKED
IN WITH
MONTHS.
MEANTIME... I CHECKED
IN WITH THE
MONTHS.
MEANTIME... I CHECKED
IN WITH THE IDAHO
MEANTIME... I CHECKED
IN WITH THE IDAHO
MEANTIME... I CHECKED
IN WITH THE IDAHO
ATTORNEY
MEANTIME... I CHECKED
IN WITH THE IDAHO
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
IN WITH THE IDAHO
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
IN WITH THE IDAHO
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
OFFICE
IN WITH THE IDAHO
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
OFFICE TO
IN WITH THE IDAHO
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
OFFICE TO SEE
IN WITH THE IDAHO
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
OFFICE TO SEE IF
IN WITH THE IDAHO
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
OFFICE TO SEE IF THERE
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
OFFICE TO SEE IF THERE
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
OFFICE TO SEE IF THERE
ARE
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
OFFICE TO SEE IF THERE
ARE ANY
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
OFFICE TO SEE IF THERE
ARE ANY UPDATES
OFFICE TO SEE IF THERE
ARE ANY UPDATES
OFFICE TO SEE IF THERE
ARE ANY UPDATES
REGARDING
OFFICE TO SEE IF THERE
ARE ANY UPDATES
REGARDING THEIR
ARE ANY UPDATES
REGARDING THEIR
ARE ANY UPDATES
REGARDING THEIR
INVESTIGATION
ARE ANY UPDATES
REGARDING THEIR
INVESTIGATION IN
REGARDING THEIR
INVESTIGATION IN
REGARDING THEIR
INVESTIGATION IN
CONNECTION
REGARDING THEIR
INVESTIGATION IN
CONNECTION WITH
REGARDING THEIR
INVESTIGATION IN
CONNECTION WITH THIS
INVESTIGATION IN
CONNECTION WITH THIS
INVESTIGATION IN
CONNECTION WITH THIS
CASE,
INVESTIGATION IN
CONNECTION WITH THIS
CASE, AS
INVESTIGATION IN
CONNECTION WITH THIS
CASE, AS WELL
INVESTIGATION IN
CONNECTION WITH THIS
CASE, AS WELL AS
INVESTIGATION IN
CONNECTION WITH THIS
CASE, AS WELL AS TAMMY
CONNECTION WITH THIS
CASE, AS WELL AS TAMMY
CONNECTION WITH THIS
CASE, AS WELL AS TAMMY
DAYBELL'S
CONNECTION WITH THIS
CASE, AS WELL AS TAMMY
DAYBELL'S DEATH
CASE, AS WELL AS TAMMY
DAYBELL'S DEATH
CASE, AS WELL AS TAMMY
DAYBELL'S DEATH
INVESTIGATION.
DAYBELL'S DEATH
INVESTIGATION.
DAYBELL'S DEATH
INVESTIGATION.
SHE'S
DAYBELL'S DEATH
INVESTIGATION.
SHE'S THE
DAYBELL'S DEATH
INVESTIGATION.
SHE'S THE LATE
DAYBELL'S DEATH
INVESTIGATION.
SHE'S THE LATE WIFE
DAYBELL'S DEATH
INVESTIGATION.
SHE'S THE LATE WIFE OF
INVESTIGATION.
SHE'S THE LATE WIFE OF
INVESTIGATION.
SHE'S THE LATE WIFE OF
CHAD
INVESTIGATION.
SHE'S THE LATE WIFE OF
CHAD DAYBELL.
SHE'S THE LATE WIFE OF
CHAD DAYBELL.
SHE'S THE LATE WIFE OF
CHAD DAYBELL.
A
SHE'S THE LATE WIFE OF
CHAD DAYBELL.
A SPOKESPERSON
SHE'S THE LATE WIFE OF
CHAD DAYBELL.
A SPOKESPERSON FOR
CHAD DAYBELL.
A SPOKESPERSON FOR
CHAD DAYBELL.
A SPOKESPERSON FOR
THE
CHAD DAYBELL.
A SPOKESPERSON FOR
THE A-G'S
CHAD DAYBELL.
A SPOKESPERSON FOR
THE A-G'S OFFICE
CHAD DAYBELL.
A SPOKESPERSON FOR
THE A-G'S OFFICE TELLS
A SPOKESPERSON FOR
THE A-G'S OFFICE TELLS
A SPOKESPERSON FOR
THE A-G'S OFFICE TELLS
ME...
A SPOKESPERSON FOR
THE A-G'S OFFICE TELLS
ME... THE
A SPOKESPERSON FOR
THE A-G'S OFFICE TELLS
ME... THE INVESTIGATION
THE A-G'S OFFICE TELLS
ME... THE INVESTIGATION
THE A-G'S OFFICE TELLS
ME... THE INVESTIGATION
IS
THE A-G'S OFFICE TELLS
ME... THE INVESTIGATION
IS STILL
THE A-G'S OFFICE TELLS
ME... THE INVESTIGATION
IS STILL ONGOING.
ME... THE INVESTIGATION
IS STILL ONGOING.
