 
Framework of Hope

By Yang Liu

Copyright 2019 Yang Liu

#  Table of Contents

Part I 3

The Struggle 4

Rates 8

Accumulation 13

Demand 18

Supply 22

Optimization 26

Minimization 31

Maximization 36

Part II 41

Carbon Machines 42

Natural Design 47

Canadian Extract 52

Chinese Holism 57

Extremism 62

One World 67

# Part I

##  The Struggle

At the core of a human being is hope. Without hope, life would never flourish to the fullest potential. Hope is a spark – lighting the fire to give a human being motivation. Like a small flame to a large cauldron, it will take time for the water within to boil. It will eventually boil – pushing onwards through the despairs in life. As long as there is a better future, one can reach for it with both hands. The final conclusion of this book is hope that through arises all the critical things to our survival. If one wants life to stay a mystery then maybe this book is not for you. If one is curious than by all means this book will be at least a worthwhile read. In the end, life can only be lived in happiness – no matter who you are. Hope is the golden key to human existence.

Two attitudes towards how to live life: one extrinsic, the other intrinsic. The two gives way to highly different societies. Attitude does indeed make a huge difference. Whether the West is better than the East is a topic I can only speak from experience, it being highly subjective. In the mad pursuit of personal happiness in the West, not everyone makes it; some fall through the cracks. Not everyone is successful even in their own right. However, the successful people are successful beyond imagination. For the sake of others in the Eastern world, more people manage to reach a certain level of happiness. Sacrifices will always be made to continue either way of life. Everyone has to live with the choices they have made. Through extract can come holism and through holism can one arrive at extract. The two different attitudes are faces to the same whole.

The Western civilization has taught me that life cannot flourish to the fullest potential without hope. That hope is the quintessential element to human existence. Everything on Earth needs positive expectations to persist. Eastern civilization is extrinsic motivation based – sacrificing for the greater good. In a Chinese elementary school, the teachers would tell stories of how soldiers would sacrifice themselves for victory when the technology was insufficient to defeat the enemy. These stories glorify those who sacrificed themselves. In the Western world, it may be the ingenuity of the soldiers to make bombs from ordinary equipment. Intelligence drives innovation. How intelligence is used is attitude dependant. Especially towards how a goal should be achieved. Both civilizations have their own method to preserve hope, to move forward in times of despair. The resulting outcome on the population will alter and vary according to these methods employed. Without hope, there can not be a prosperous future.

The inevitability of death literally means when one chooses to conceive a child – knowing that death is inevitable, one is literally sending a human being to die. In the line between life and death, there are the moments riddled with despair. Then, there are the moments of joy which makes life worth living. Like fire, hope is passed on from one generation to the next. All of that hope is cumulative as one generation has it better than the next. Each generation will be a bit better-off than the last. As long as there is hope, life will continue. Not everyone believes hope, giving someone else hope and giving yourself hope is the way to live life. Some people want others to experience the same as they did. The problem with hope is that it allows all life to flourish. Not all life has struck a balance between self-interest and the interest of others. What one chooses to leave behind matters as death is the inevitable fate of everyone.

The pen and paper are the deadliest set of weapons known to man. If a person has an idea, he can communicate it to an audience, it can be a process to big things whether they be great or disastrous. It either be progress from the momentum gathered or taking a few steps back. The most tragic example being what Hitler motivated the German people to do. Hitler could rally people to his cause, he tapped into the unconscious of the German people at the time. He gave his people false hope. Gathering people – binding hearts and minds is incredibly powerful as a people united can achieve so much. People make the pen and paper the deadliest weapon on Earth.

When thoughts and instincts combine as one, the magical usually happens. This book may be difficult to understand for those who purely rely on their instincts. Though if one relied on their instincts to make everyday decisions, then this book may not be necessary. Everyone has these instincts. To the extremes, most people will get a unified perspective out of this book. Thoughts and instincts meld together to create action.

Are we human beings the product of the environment? Meaning how we were raised not what color is the sky. Are we the product of our biology? Some people can not rise above their environment. They become a piece in the machinery that sustains the world. The kind of people are the majority. If the world was racist, they will be racist. They will beckon with the tide, not possessing the strength to rise above the waves. Then, there is the person who can rise above his environment. He may be unstable but he is a driving force for change in this world. Eventually, regardless of whether one succumb or rises above their environment, we must all live and adapt to our circumstances.

What is supposed to be a book regarding design has turned into a full-on discussion regarding societies. Who knew a tiny observation could reveal so much. All it takes is a fundamental detail to betray a larger picture to lead to new predictions. That tiny detail may be all that the world need to become whole. For the Western world, nothing will change. Their way of life will continue save for a few tweaks. Nobody knows what will happen to the Eastern world. Extremism will not be compatible with this tiny detail difference. A death of a culture is not necessarily a death of a people; more ideally, it is a chance to begin anew. One detail lead to another, I saw civilization from another perspective.

Systems seem to pop up again and again. Technically speaking, life are biological systems consisting of tiny carbon machines governed by the laws of physics. General systems theory proposes that complex systems share basic organizing principles regardless of purpose. It is a change, a breath of fresh air for a book to be written from the design perspective to support an observation regarding life. Perhaps the understanding of life from the purely the biological perspective has hit an end. New methods to analyze life must be introduced to create new results. As new perspective often leads to the new. Life runs on power, that power comes from an engine, that engine must require fuel. Another way of looking at it is all physical systems require space, the fundamental truth to all systems then would be to let entropy arrange them into their final positions. Biocybernetics is a fancy term to describe biological systems with feedback – able to correct itself in light of error. A nonbiological example would be steering a sail boat into a dock when there is wind. They seem to appear time and time again when I searched the world for answers. The search always leads back to systems.

The fundamental elements of design outlined in this book is more of the fundamental description. The use of mathematical notations is not existent; I am more of the creative type. At least to me, critical thinking and the many forms of it combined with the communication abilities is of much greater importance than math equations only people with specialized knowledge will understand. The important skills acquired in my journey are critical thinking and the communication of what is known through common language both verbally and written. The model derived is from basic concepts with universal applicability which is then employed to describe the world as we know it.

Things are literally and figuratively easier to pick up if they are all chained together. One link after another makes everything easier to remember. If one were to be shown a bunch of words – the easiest way to remember them is to make a story about them using all the words. One will probably remember all of them versus purely memorizing them alone. The other important thing to keep in mind is something my martial arts instructor told me. If one throws a punch, one can start by memorizing a few points of motion. The points being the locations of your arm – usually beginning and ending for the beginner. Preparation take up one point, another point for the strike. Between these the beginning and end, one can divide as finely as one likes to the point of infinity. Once one knows enough of the many points in between, one can become more precise until one has perfected the movement with great speed. That idea is literally one of the core ideas of calculus: infinitesimally small. What is learned in school is not totally useless. With that said, get familiar with all the critical points, then go faster. Errors will be made but one can correct them as one goes. Go faster and faster until the task can be done at the fastest speed one desires. When one can do it with speed, one is ready to take on the world. Together as a whole, can one recreate the tiny details.

The problem I have encountered is whether Western values will lead to the excessive consumption of resources. Only time will tell. If all the world adopted Western values, the Earth may not be able to support all those excessive habits. The vast majority of people in the Western world have lifestyles – requiring a lot. Perhaps each civilization will find their own way to survive into the future; possibly surpassing Western civilization. Maybe people will be immigrating to the Eastern parts of the world. Some people already are moving to the Eastern parts of the world, perhaps just not as common as people immigrating to the Western parts of the world. Western civilization does have its problems.

Unless the experts catch-on to educate the mass, this book will create highly unequal outcomes. An idea first popped into existence in my head. Observation leading to more ideas; the world thrusted upon me in all of a sudden, an idea not existing in this world. How what I say will be received – I do not know. Once out there, really nothing more I can do about it. Leave or take it is all I can say. Just like if you find a meal to be not to your liking then just do not eat it. Just do not do it. Some will say it is speculative without observing to see for themselves first. For the world will be torn asunder from within and yet become one fractured whole.

These set of ideas have been rather difficult to put down on paper. My dad said to me regarding how every sentence written must have a reference for it to be taken seriously. If a complete objective analysis cannot be made then it is too subjective. This book is written without reference because the fundamentals of this world are employed to create something new. What is existing is employed in an interdisciplinary way no one else has done before. Anything interdisciplinary requires foundational concepts – pushing understanding towards a leap – before chaining the concepts together. This conceptualization is incredibly difficult as it is not taught in school.

I am trying to change a small aspect of human existence, to chip away at one the woes of the human condition. In my hopes and dreams, I wish I chipped away at a disease such as a mental illness. Teeth are really not that big of deal to creating life if you know what I know. Sure, plague buildup leads to heart problems. Out of the many variables, teeth do seem to be more fundamental variable. Realistically, I have only being able to reduce one variable in the complex existence of humanity. That one variable is not necessarily stable as factors may affect the outcome of this variable. Those factors are, however, rare. The miseries of life can be anchored with hope – chipping away one variable affecting many.

I have struggled before the triumph. The first struggle was writing. Then came the struggle to love all of humanity unconditionally. Writing was never part of the life I envisioned for myself. Despite all that is at disposal, I chose to look at it all from the most fundamental perspective – deriving only what must follow. The world will now have to struggle to grow to triumph against its own reality. I have hopefully not struggled in vain.

##  Rates

Mathematics is all about solving the general problem. Mathematicians often have to think in ways akin to seeing the fundamental relationship in everything even when the two matters of attentions are vastly different. Mathematics is a way of thinking – extending well beyond numbers. Once the mathematician has reduced the relationship to an equation – the fundamental relationship is then finally understood. This ability to perceive is a developable skill. Some will have better success than others simply because they will enjoy it more. Enjoyment often leads to commitment. Most of the time, the specific values are substituted with variables. When the problem is solved, the solution is an expression of variables. One can vary the variables of the expression to generate a graph – encompassing all possible solutions. Technically, a finite amount of space can not express an infinite graph. Not physically but by reason, it is possible to know where the end lies. The beauty of mathematics is seeing the fundamental relationship between seemingly unrelated things.

Physics is about solving the natural problem to lead to a solution – revealing the description behind nature. Physicist often have to find the easiest solution to a problem. To the human mind, nature can often be very complicated. The harmonious marriage between laziness and creativity is the reality behind the easiest solution. Physicist define human ingenuity's gold standard. Through practice – like everything else in life – finding or creating the easiest solution can be a skill fine honed. The process can be simplifying a complicated mathematical equation down to the simplest form – depending on the constraints of the physical situation. For example, a partial differential equation can be reduced to an ordinary differential equation then to an algebraic equation via the Laplace transform. In reality, it probably is never as simple as one imagine. Simplicity is what makes physics beautiful.

If physics and mathematics are white collar professions, engineering would be the dirty, blue collar work. Technically, society at large view engineers with a great deal of respect – the way things are done engineering wise are often not as elegant as one would expect. Engineering is all about approximating the solution. Reality can be too complicated to even describe mathematically or if it can be described, the equations may not be able to be solved analytically. What sensible people would do is use their analytical abilities combined with their ingenuity. For example, what would happen if a dam ruptured? The lands would flood, yes. How will it flood? Instead of trying to solve some complicated partial differential equation using powerful computers, another possible solution would be to build a model of the landscape. Find out what happens when flooding occurs by pouring a bucket of water beginning at the dam. This approach sounds clever but is far from elegant. Compared to Euler to the power of imaginary Pi equals negative one, it works, what more does one want? The art and craft of problem solving – applicable across all professions – yields the engineering solutions. Engineering has a very hands-on component.

Rates is the element of change. Without rates, there can be no change. The continuous change, the flow of elements within a system or from a system to another system forces an equilibrium point to be attained. Rates. Two forms: a source and a sink. Positive or negative, respectively. The source provides rates into the system, it forces or causes value to increase. The sinks provide rates out of the system. The sink cause values to decrease. A system in this book is any part of reality one wishes to separate from the universe to study. Rates always precedes change.

Rates can be stress in a rod when the rod is exposed to tension or compression. Rates has an element that goes into a system that forces something out of the system. If the rate at one point in space is positive, then that point in space contributes to the system. If the rate at one point in space is negative, the system is then drained – rates goes out of the system. Rates can consist of a single element or many of the same elements considered as one. Rates in this case is the engineering equivalent of the derivative found in calculus: a number over another number.

What goes out of a system must initially begin with what went into a system. What goes out can be physical. If a person came out of a store, they must have entered it in the first place somehow. This idea may seem extremely obvious that saying it makes one sound like a dotard. This idea, however, appears to be true for every observable thing with an in and out. This simple idea is extremely powerful as even the most complicated machines or systems share common roots with extremely simple systems. How interesting this idea is become a level more interesting when what enters in is energy or the ability to do work or if it becomes another form of energy. What exists in a system must initially begin with it entering.

General systems theory and simplexity is all about how one thinks about it. Seeing the fundamental purpose with the idea of making a complex thing simple or the other way around opens many doors. Describing a technical process to a general, average, non-expert becomes easier. Thinking about the system becomes easier. A human being can only hold so much in his short-term, working memory. Things should be as simple as possible. Simplexity combined with general systems theory makes such a task possible: simplicity is key. Simplexity is how simple things can be made complex and how complex things can be made simple via the powers of human perception. For example, a car is a piece of metal on four wheels that moves people around. Source the origin of all the parts and how they came into existence introduces a whole new layer of complexity. This type of thinking is what simplexity is known for. It may seem trivial at first, though when applied to complicated systems that exceeds working memory such as systems composing of trillions of systems, it can be a life saver. The human mind has limits; certain ways of thinking are preferred over other less efficient methods. The optimal way is the best way which is all heavily circumstantial.

What goes in and out of a system can have direction, magnitude, and quantity. A river flows towards an ocean. Along the way, the flow of water is slowed by the turns and bends. Slowed down going towards the ocean as the velocity of the water goes horizontal. If the water hits a dam, it will stop unless the water rises above the dam level or the dam lets the water through. If this river was an electric or electronic circuit, the turns and bends would be the resistors and the dam would be the diode. The resistors dissipate energy, while the dam – much like how diodes coverts electrical energy into light and heat – converts the flow of water into electricity. The direction, magnitude, and quantity can vary with respect to where the water is being measured to. The total always remains the same. A rate can have a magnitude and direction.

Transformations can occur with energy. Electrical energy carried by electrons passes along a circuit. On the journey from one end to the other end, it will encounter circuit elements that will transform this energy into heat, light, or even motion. Electrical energy can be converted into heat energy, light energy, or kinetic energy. If someone were to give an awe-inspiring speech that motivated people greatly to the point where they are motivated to take action. That flow of information, must have hit a threshold – cascading into a high rate much like a river to an overflowing dam. The informational exchange between systems is like a river, a flow. They tangle together to perform well beyond what the individual system is capable of. Rates can transform from one rate to another rate.

What goes in and what goes out of the system can be measured via a time average to acquire what is within the boundary during the time elapsed. A quantity over a time average. slap on the direction if necessary. In terms of an awe-inspiring speech, it would be bits per second. Multiply by the time the speech took, one gets the total number of bits transferred to another system. In terms of a river, it would be the volume of water per second. Multiply that by the time to get how much water has passed a defined point. If what goes in is greater than out – whatever is being moved, transported – will have a portion going out and a portion staying within the system.

What goes into a system can be a trigger to release build-up – resulting in a greater output than user input. A chain reaction can be released by a single input. The best example is the car. The driver steps on the pedal, the car then moves. The result of the input – stepping on the gas pedal – causes a vehicle weighing usually in the tons or even more range to move. A small input yields a very large output. If the fuel going into the car is considered; what went in and out of the car evaluated in their energy and mass components would be the same. For most applications, if preparing input is not too expensive then it should be good. The practical aspect is with minimum input can it yield a powerful output? Time required to release the output is also important. No one wants to wait for too long. All powerful machinery has small human input to large output.

Systems controlled by a human being allow the control of the system itself for little effort relative to the human being. The example is very obvious. Systems in this case can be a car or a muscle. A car allows a relatively large gain of speed through the slight touch of a pedal. A muscle allows movement through thought. What goes into a system is carefully organized to allow a chain reaction once the trigger is pulled. In total, if one accounts all that went into the system and that went out of a system one should get unity: conservation of mass and energy. Unless there is some unknown force in the universe nobody knows about, what goes out of a system must initially begin with what went into the system. A human being achieves what he can not muster himself through careful physical manifestation of systematic logic.

Imagine trying to dock to a tubular shaped structure in space. The controls must require little effort. It does not require an astronaut to run around the spacecraft to change massive dials or turn wheels. A simple touch of the finger allows seamless movement of the spacecraft. This design is different than the German submarines of World War II. The operator had to turn a bunch of wheels to get results. Whether German engineering and NASA engineering can be compared to each other is a comparison best not made. The toilets in Germany have a little ramp in them to allow a person to inspect their scat after one is done. Different people have different ways of thinking. Some are known for robust, simple technology that works under almost all conditions on Earth. Some are known for mass producing the living-daylight out of a product at the lowest cost imaginable. In the end, even the management systems of these people require little effort going into production from the top to get big result. Good systems require little in to get a big out relative to the human being as humans.

Achieving mechanical reliability requires the stress at any point in the system to not exceed the threshold. Stress is force divided by area within a solid. If a component in a gun is not thick enough, it will break very quickly. If the system were to be mass produced, it would be a very costly error. The more stress in general a system can handle, the more reliable and robust it will be. The environment will inject forces into the system, the system reacts concordantly. The bigger the parts, the more stress it can usually handle which varies with the strength of the material. The greater the toughness, the less agile, the less speed the system will have. A tank can withstand a lot relative to the motor bike. The tank can not, like the motor bike, speed down the motor way at exhilarating speeds. Though the tank crew will be generally safe from the external. For both systems to be robust, the components they are made from must bear stress repeatedly without breaking. Usually that is a matter of size relative to the force. What goes in at a rate must be dispersed over what the system can tolerate. The more the stress is below the threshold, the longer the system will last.

In the practical sense, people of varying strength and dexterity must be able to use a system. Sometimes a system may be designed to require more force relative to a small human being to start it. That way it is child safe. The lawn mover is the best example as it requires a strong pull to start it. The small input to large output also is more expensive as it requires one system to cascade down from the input to reach the final control element. Increasing sophistication requires additional resources and time. Leading to increased cost. Any system beyond what the human being can control with his own strength will require additional systems to control it. The bicycle can be steered via man-power alone. Requiring equal input to output. Input to output can be equal while output can exceed input relative to the human. When output is lesser than input relative to the human being, the system has some serious design flaws. Investors want to make money, turn a profit on their investments. The more return generated, the better the investor one is. With money, the ability to make money, is more important than how much one horde it. Although for anything to become rates, there must be accumulation in the first place. Easily controllable systems are designed to allow small human input within an acceptable range to large machine output.

Like all things, what goes in and out can be large or small relative to something. Two opposing values must have a neutral reference point. The highest of highs will always be relative to the lowest of lows. Perception of the world is a product of the human mind. Quantity, like all comparisons, must have a neutral point. Two opposing elements must have a neutral departure point in the human conscious because human assign meaning to their senses to turn it into reality. A human being does and it is relative to himself. One may be too weak to lift some boxes; one may be too tall for a car. All is relative to the individual. It could be how much force can be produced in a given time. Mostly compared to the statistical average in most cases. In most cases, a stream of water from a fire hose is considered large. From the Niagara Falls, it would be considered humongous. Although the size of these rates would change relative to the reference size. If one was the size of an elephant, the water from a fire hose may be considered more in the smaller category while a tap would be miniscule. Rates and the person observing the rate – the observer – will always be relative to each other as the observer is the one who assigns meaning to reality. A reference is a necessity to human judgement.

If it can be relative to the human being, it can be relative to design criteria. What the designer want dictates the criteria. If one wants a simple system, then have as few parts as possible. If one wants a system to be robust and durable, make sure all elements within the system can tolerate stress well and repeatedly. The stress should be distributed evenly over many elements. A mechanical system stress is the force over an area. The system can be in tension or compression or a mixture of both. Stress: an external element or force putting pressure on a system. If a system can not with stand the stress it will wash away into the chaos that is the world. As a designer, it all comes down to what is desired. Robust and durable or precise and delicate – difficult to have both as precision requires small movements which usually mean smaller parts that cannot withstand a large force, unless the stress is distributed over many smaller parts which would inevitably make the system delicate. Systems must handle or tolerate rates both entering and exiting the system to function successfully. Design criteria and human needs are relative.

Rates is the most basic design element. Getting this variable right ensures the other variables ample breathing room. It all begins with rates.

##  Accumulation

Accumulation is what that can become rates: the element of change. Accumulation always precedes a rate. A quantity distributed over time can either be exchanged into a different form than it originally was or built-up before released. Accumulation precedes change. Whenever there is change, there must be accumulation preceding it.

Large examples are often the best as they are the easiest to see. Imagining large-scale effects is easier because one can vary the degree something will go through by drawing upon what one has already seen. A dam harvests the potential energy of stationary water. What is static can turn into flow in an instant should the dam burst. With the burst comes change as the landscape is flooded. Potential is judged by how much it can change the environment, how much of an impact it has on the world. Even if it is an idea that spreads like the common cold among humans, how it can generate change is the assessor of potential. In physical cases, potential energy to kinetic energy will, often suffice. The higher the object is, the greater an impact it will make. Conditions such as terminal velocity plays a role. If a large object falls from space and is large enough to make it to Earth without disintegrating in the atmosphere, it will create a substantial thud upon hitting the Earth. Best example is an extinction-level event such as an asteroid forming a humongous crater.

The static can become kinetic and the kinetic can become static. In the observable reality, the force is mainly gravity. Kinetic energy to potential energy – potential energy to kinetic energy. Then there is chemical potential energy. A gun firing a bullet, chemical potential energy is stored in the gunpowder. Once ignited, it turns into hot gases – propelling the bullet towards the intended destination. If a spring stretched or pushed, it would then have potential energy to release into motion. When a rate of what is moving has no exit, it accumulates. From motion to stationary and from stationary to motion.

The difference between the accumulated will determine the amount and how quickly the accumulations will come to an equilibrium. If there is a large difference between two, a large initial exchange will result. Imagine a large and hot object being place into a really cold liquid: hot-glowing iron plunged into water. The water will hiss as the metal is plunged into the water because a large amount of heat is transferred into the surrounding water. Imagine two objects of roughly equal temperature such as an iceberg in the Arctic Sea. The iceberg floats in the water. Little energy is exchanged between the two bodies. By human feelings, they are roughly the same temperature. The difference dictates the magnitude of what is exchanged. The greater the difference, the greater the exchange. Two people of different professions will exchange much different knowledge relative to each other while two people of the same profession will exchange information of the same knowledge base. The possibility to exchange must exist first. If the hot glowing iron was completely shielded off from the water, not much of an exchange can happen. If communication is cut-off between two people, no equilibrium can be established between the two. Difference between the stockpiles will determine how their exchange will come to an equilibrium.

The word potential in the everyday usage often refers to the potential of a child. What the child will do when he grows up. A term people use. A child is usually believed to have infinite potential as he is capable of becoming anything. Though once subjected to an IQ test, it almost becomes certain what he will and not be doing with his life. Though some psychologists suggest no matter how much time is spent teaching a not very intelligent person to accomplish a task, that person will never fully grasp the task – to do the task with absolute precision and accuracy. The hopeful, optimistic outlook is one of society. Supposedly, it comes down to a number of factors which must all come together to be optimized as one. Not so much in Eastern societies as they – people – are just not like that. Their fundamental outlook on human potential is built on data: facts like test scores. Religion is not a big hit over in China – Christianity especially. Eastern civilization is not built so much on hope. Does potential exist relative to how far one can predict the future? If one could see the exact future, then what a child could be can be perceived as his potential to be. Much like how potential energy will definitely convert all to kinetic energy at the bottom, it is not a maybe. It does not rely on the probability or the chance of him developing a crippling illness or him going to a prestigious school or program. In a physical system, for all the potential energy to be converted into kinetic energy, it much have reached the bottom. If the system becomes stuck somewhere or hits the rough, then the potential energy becomes stuck at another level, never fully releasing or the potential energy is dissipated elsewhere. The system, if it reaches the bottom will not be what the theoretical limited speed predicted it to be. The more potential energy the system has, the harder it is to stop once it gathers momentum. How everyday word is used betrays how the human mind organizes the world.

In everyday human life, persistence, tenacity, and resilience is a better indicator of how successful a human being will be. The ability to delay gratification has something to do with how successful a person will be in life. The people who can delay gratification, are probably more likely to be successful as they can envision a dream, chase after it without immediate return – reaping the rewards only further down the road. They would have not arrived at their destination without persistence. These people are more likely to better adjust themselves with what life at them. They have the potential to develop multiple skills to deal with their reality. Although they may not necessarily become that single winner, that Olympic gold medalist or that astronaut. They will persist and become successful in their own ways.

How does potential energy and the potential of a child play into design? How the entire system is designed will dictate how the systems within the system behaves. If a society, the world is at war, the children will have to live with war in mind. That one day, they may need to kill another human being. The environment sets the goals. By looking at potential this way, one can assign enough room to allow accumulation to grow, to dissipate properly to form the structures necessary to conduct flow. Assign enough room for the potential to not crowd each other. Potential can be neatly arranged to allow it to turn into flow. That the flow will not crowd each other as well. Space can be both the literal sense of it and the figurative sense of it. In the literal sense, if balloons were to be placed next to each other, then allowed to be filled with air. For the balloons to not become crooked, there must be ample space. A force opposes the entrance of air into the balloon while a force pushes the air into the balloon. It results in an inward rate going into the balloon. The elastic membrane will store an elastic potential energy to force the air of the balloon again. The timespan it takes to release this potential will determine the how powerful the entity is.

What the designer wants has substantial impact. To maximize storage, a space will be full. To ensure a system stays neat, a designer want less which is relative to supply and demand. Having a small stockpile is necessary to kick start what goes in and out of a system – it will determine what a system can do. Whether it be a car, computer, or a human being. Everything to be, can be viewed as potential in the human conscious. As reality is interpreted in the brain. How one element exits in relationship to another can be taken advantage of by putting them together in the right order. Without a relationship to describe what things are relative to each other, there will be no whole to be assembled. The human mind is a very powerful organizing tool. Organizing the material world and the abstract relationship coming with the world via the human mind.

Potential, sometimes, the same potential repels each other. Other time different potentials attract each other. People of scientific background working at a cutting-edge computing company who can all think rationally. The new hirers are evaluated by their potential. Too much potential compressed into one space, the systems within the larger system will go into disorder. For the moment, it is potential. This element needs space both figuratively and literally. Designing around potential requires ample space for potential to not become excessive flux at critical points. If a person in a crowd is prone to angry outbursts. Then putting him in a crowd will affect everyone. The information exchange between different systems within the larger system will be loud: a large portion of people will be affected. Spread the crowd out to the point where his voice, his projection; information will not reach everyone, his potential will dissipate safely. Take a circuit board as another example. A circuit board component may become hot compared to the other components. If this piece is crammed in with all other components, the flux of heat will inevitably affect the other components. Spread the component out or add a heat sink to release the heat, then the heat will dissipate more evenly within the given room. The path for energy flow is usually from accumulation to rates. How much space to allocate varies with how much is accumulated. How much of it needs to be released. For circuit boards, the electrical system usually functions within the operating temperature. Two identical accumulations compete with each other for space.

From the rates and accumulation perspective, the accumulation is the stationary water stored upstream becoming flowing water: rates downstream. Water ricochets off one fish then it ricochets another fish. They must be at angle to each other to receive maximum flow to minimize their trajectory. A portion of that rate accumulates as the fish deforms ever so slightly to the flow of the river. That accumulatio becomes rates again – is dissipated – once the fish is out of the water. If salmon really does swim in a way that distributes the flow evenly – no flow accumulates into certain pockets to disrupt the salmon. With the flick and swish of the tail a salmon does to adjust itself in the water is one concerning scales. The skin must have nerves that can sense how the scales bend with the passing water. A flow from the river may not necessarily be uniform as the water to the left of the fish may be flowing faster than the right or the flow may be turbulent. The case may be when water flow on one side of the fish is slightly greater than the other, the fish can sense through how much the scales bend. Adjust with a tail flick opposite of the uneven flow. That is only where the evidence leads, however. A sensor designed and positioned strategically such a way should work. Though does it actually mean fish with scales stay balanced in the face of current this way? Rates and accumulation are simply divide and multiply, respectively.

Like anything in the real world, manipulating a stockpile is far more difficult than manipulating rates. Stockpiles are usually not small. They disappear fast, however. Humans are relatively feeble. Compared to what is out there in the universe, humans are small though not as small as ants. Ants, however, can lift a lot relative to their own body weight. In the physical case, the larger the stockpile is, the more difficult it is to manipulate. Larger objects are generally more difficult to lift. Humans must then rely on planning and reason to create machines or plans that can do the heavy lifting for or assist them strategically, respectively. The other solution is to break the large object down into little pieces. That way moving the objects becomes more manageable and can be completed bit by bit. When designing cars, there is a trade-off between torque and speed. The greater the torque a car can produce the slower it will be. Although a tank is not necessarily a car, it still is very difficult for a man to stop. The tank produces a lot of torque. Unless a person blows up the tank with an anti-tank mine or missile. That is another story for war. Stockpiles are often bulky and fragile to external disturbances, converting one rate into the other is much easier.

No matter what people research and develop, it depends on who uses it. Poppies can be harvested commercially to be synthesized into morphine or a farmer can sell them illegally to be made into heroin. Drugs inevitably ruin lives as moderation with drugs is observed to be impossible which is said out of the addictive nature of drugs. The addictive nature of drugs is exploited to run an unfortunately profitable business. From the bare basic perspective of rates and accumulation, drugs serve as a catalyst in the brain that leads to a short temporary burst of feel good. In this case, there is a catalyst. Drugs and the brain are like explosives to a dam. The potential is held back released slowly for good reasons. The water is released in a controlled manner to generate useful activity just like how the neurotransmitters in the brain are released in a controlled, steady manner to create various feelings. What each of these neurotransmitters do anyone can look up via the internet. All of these neurotransmitters all come with names such as oxytocin, dopamine or serotonin. Seeing the neurotransmitter as just water held behind a dam is a vastly overly simplification. The point is to explain the catalytic nature of drugs as explosives to blowing up the dam to release all the water held behind. Though the neuron is not literally blown up. Once the dam blows, the lands become flooded. Different life forms will come to live on the wet, flooded lands. The new ecosystems become, all of a sudden, become excess water dependant. Much like how drugs addicts become addicted to the feeling of high they will never catch again. If that extra water is removed, the ecosystem will change and revert to the normal state. Much like how a drug addict suffers from withdrawal. No one can fully control what people will do with their lives.

Removing the control element from a system – letting the same happen for longer than the maximum that is recommended. Blowing up the dam is not the best example. A better example would be removing the manager from a store although the latter is more abstract. Feedback control could be a better explanation. Control systems are then broad enough to cover them. The key point here is that rates can saturate a system if enough of it accumulates. Any system that has a large reservoir should be extra careful about anything catalytic. Anything that can make the process go faster than it regularly would. Not letting any explosives near a dam or not doing drugs is hopefully common sense. Neither of the two appears any good after exposure to explosives or drugs, respectively. Every system needs to be regulated one way or another.

What accumulates can becomes rates, though it can become rates faster if there is a catalyst. The right environment is necessary. Accumulation releasing requires the right conditions, the right environment to become rates.

##  Demand

Demand is fundamentally to fill in a void arising from a missing element in the equilibrium. Demand would not exist if the system did not require a source to maintain steady-state while there is an exit – outward flow – in the system. The system always has an equilibrium point where the rates – what is going in and out of the system – adds up to zero. The best example is a company that can satisfy the demand for the time being. What is entering the company is the same as what goes out. A system may differ from another in various ways. The systems do, however, share fundamentally similar structure that share the same general functions. A company requires employees to convert one form of input into another before the selling the final output as a product. A bike requires a mechanism to convert the power from the legs to the pedals then to the wheels. First comes input then output. What is missing must be filled to maintain an equilibrium.

That need – desire – arises from the need for satisfaction, in humans at least. To be satisfied means someone has had enough. The equilibrium point has been reached. To be over satisfied means one has crossed the equilibrium point. The simplest example is eating too much, too little or just right. It can be inevitably difficult to judge or perceive how satisfied one is. Various factors such as has one had breakfast or eaten at all throughout the entire day or whether one is taking medication that causes weight gain hinders accurate judgement. For the former, consuming excess calories during dinner is the result. For the latter, consuming to satiety will likely result in over consumption as how one perceives food intake via the instinctive feeling is no longer adequate. Satisfaction is a complex human concept motivating people to act to attain it.

The stereotype goes that Asians are smart and are mathematically competent. Chinese, Japanese, and Korean are symbolic languages: dyslexic friendly. Earlier exposure to it grants somewhat an edge over the English language speaker. There is a book regarding race and IQ. How the wealth of nations is IQ dependant. Not overly interested with skin colour related topics or the shape of eyes, a brief glance online regarding the topic yielded some answers. The question that popped into mind was if such authors believe race and intelligence are correlated, do they think the same about penis sizes? A high school teacher said stereotypes have a grain of truth. Asians are good at math probably because their language is symbolic. Anyways, after some internet searching, a table showing East Asians are smart while Africans are stupid by IQ. Along with a David Suzuki video about how the author of such a book should be fired. The book does cause people grief as a man of rather dark complexion spoke about how his son asked him whether he is stupid all because of the book. Foundational exposure alters fundamental perception.

By the living standards compared to the Western world, the Chinese are probably not smarter than the people in the Western world as they have not completed a system to benefit everyone. The Chinese have problems with the systematic – not in their culture. Maybe, in all the reality, is the fact that intelligent people are willing to overlook. By that perspective, the filthiest, dirtiest people are the smartest. That is merely a speculation. What may really happen in China as the country now is supposed to be unrecognizable is the transformation due to the large rate in as the rates accumulates; hinders the system greatly. The accumulated eventually seeps into the corners of this rather large country. However, just like how water can accumulate to go nowhere, a chunk of the money is pocketed by corrupt officials. The system transporting the many is not steadfast. How a people live indicates their attitude towards existence greatly.

The reason all these matters are brought up is to show the multiple dimensions of demand unlike rates or accumulation. It can be just as complicated as imagining the aftermath of their actions. For simple systems, it most likely just usually food and excretion. Complex systems often require emotional needs. Simple systems are usually systems with a straightforward enough demand to be satisfied also straightforwardly. Complex systems are not as straightforward. Usually simple systems have one or can be reduced down to a variable using the power of human perception while complex variables can or always will be more than one variable. Demand is a human concept.

The demand is to supplement the lost with a new source to maintain the equilibrium or plug the sink. A drain lets things that can not be integrated into the system to escape the system. The power to do such comes with knowledge. The saying goes knowledge is power. The question is what should one do with it? Help people? Hurt people? Dismantle society? Rebuild or repair civilization? Everyone tries to live their own lives in happiness although some may find happiness by causing others misery. That is a small percentage of people, very small percentage. People come to Canada for a better life, for a better future. Though much like how coffee is often enjoyed bittersweet, life is not much the same with the all the problems beyond current science. Life can only be lived with purpose. A sink drains the system.

Every individual contributes something to make the whole system function usually a very small rate. Some may have fast hands allowing them to cook at great speeds while some may be able to write. Together, they all come together to form different ways of generating money, satisfying the entire demand. One person usually cannot do everything. Even if they can, it usually will not be at the level of mastery. Is it better to have master craftsman work on their own jobs to make the company profitable or is it better to have Jack-of-all-trades work on problems without the same speed and precision as a master but with the necessary requirement of flexibility to interchange should something happen to the workers? People who can do a lot competently are not common. The demand set by the customers must be satisfied within a time limit or the customer will choose something else. Demand depends on how long the need exists. Should the need cease to exist, there will be no demand. Many people of different skill sets come together to form a whole system.

The Canadian education system is not what everyone would say to be a great system. A Canadian chemical engineer graduate said it is absolutely terrible. Some days the education system appears not only designed to teach but to also make dumb people miserable. The constant negative feedback in the form of low grades and test scores for more then a decade straight must surely make a person miserable. Perhaps one eventually becomes used to it. The demand is always there to create a highly-skilled work force. Is it like making butter? How the fat is separated from the milk. Will there always be people who fall through the cracks to end up homeless? In this plentiful society with so much opportunity, should there be homelessness or poverty? Everyone should be able to carve out their life own path – occupying their own niche. The complexity of human existence is a baffling one. No words can fit the picture. In a way, every way is not one hundred percent efficient, there will always be residues that has no real use but to be thrown out. Could a society have no residues? Change the education system to not treat people like milk being turned into butter, but to use the milk of human potential as a whole. The education system comes in only one size. If all the clothes in the world came in one size, only some would look reasonable in them. It would be better to find another source of butter, another source of a highly skilled workers, instead of using concentrated human potential to achieve the end result. Much like how vegetable oil can be substituted for butter in cooking, human potential can be produced naturally. Though the result is often not that great, it may be salvation's inevitable cost. Western civilization has many experts who specialize in specific subjects; often lacking a person who can integrate it all together. The system producing such people works though it inevitably has its shortcomings.

A system must maintain equilibrium to not fall back down to a previous state. Whether one wants a system to fall back down to the ground state or lift it up is a question that comes down to the operator, the designer, and the people. Going down a state usually releases something. It may be desirable to have such occur. Perturb the electrons in a specific element using the right light wavelength frequency and that element will release light. How fast the release also matters as sugar have more energy than TNT but it is not released as fast thus not as destructive. Slow releasing carbohydrates are healthier as they do not cause that dip in blood sugar later on. Usually, it is situation dependant which is usually is greatly influenced by how much time is left to achieve the goal. The demand of a system is relative to the rate it can sustain and how much potential it can hold when rate accumulate. For a big person to maintain his weight, he must eat quite a bit. Though pound by pound he will not eat more than a little guy. Each system is optimized to perform a purpose. All of these systems can come together to create a whole by subsisting each other to create a whole. Taking away additional input from a system will bring it back down to its original state.

Unsatisfied demand will usually result in an implosion or cessation of the functions of the system. The trivial, non-serious case would be the kid who wants candy. If he does not get candy then he will eventually have to go back down a level to wanting candy less or not at all. The non-trivial case is food security. No food means famine. Society will collapse. Chaos and destruction will ensure. At least that is what usually happens. Would people band together in the face of desperation? The guess one can make is concerning intelligence. Wold the mass be smart enough to see the need for order, to maintain a system to benefit everyone? Not everyone is big-picture oriented. In fact, only a small percentage of the population are. Should that small portion of the population vanish, society will cease to move forward.

These statements made are observations based – not rigorous mathematical proofs. Though the legitimacy of it is now a question. Just because it agrees with reality, does that really mean it is true? If the senses a human has does not lie or is not faulty then it is right. Satisfying a void fully can be difficult as it is not simply a matter of finding the right peg to fit the hole. The real-world has different variables coming into play that makes demand as complicated as the combination of variables themselves. Demand cannot be only be satisfied fully, demand is also not perceived fully. Mapping out the demand often requires statistical methods. A store will have a range of products of various quantity with the most popular abundantly while the least popular but still profit-making products less abundant. The store does not know the demand exactly but it can still anticipate what people could want and prepare concordantly to it. If the store anticipates the demand wrong by a lot, it will go out of business. Money is so important to survival; everything hinges on it. Money allows demand to be quantified, to assign value to a demand that can be exchanged for goods and service: a voting system. If everything was free then worth must be judged else wise. Quantifying demand into a number makes easier processing. Science is all about explaining the observable reality as simply as possible.

In modern world, people generally need to make money for a living. Based on what one wants to do, one can help people for a living. That is literally all you can do as everything requires helping people one way or another. Even the joining some secret government organization to become one of their assassins still means one is defending the state – the people – from potential harm. All one can do is help people directly or indirectly. The demand will always be there as not many humans can do every task by himself. Whether someone wishes to make a living helping directly or indirectly is a matter of personal preference. Money is the imaginary game most of us play with each other.

Demand begins with rates exiting a system. A direction in the wind. Every section of demand is meticulously tacked on until it comes full circle. Demand exists in this reality due to voids needing to be filled.

##  Supply

All these complicated issues regarding what the world can supply raises the satisfaction topic. Supply is first and foremost, judged by a human being, is how it satisfies. If it really hits the spot, it is good. The simpler the demand, the easier to satisfy as it takes only a small portion of a human being's effort. Scratching your back side when it really itches really is satisfying. For complicated issues such as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, a supply to the demand is not as clear cut. The very same can be said of Chinese people. Their ancient and complicated culture creates demand that are satisfied with not so simple solutions. The world of men creates many outlets for the human mind; all diluting from concentrates to the people. The right concentrate dissipates to satisfy.

Chinese people really like their luxury goods. Walking around Vancouver, it is not uncommon to see a Chinese person wearing a Rolex or just any other super fancy watch. Once in a while, there is always hear some story about corrupt Chinese officials hoarding money. So much of it, they have to burn it to get rid of the evidence when the police come to investigate. The idea should be one where people invest back in the people who believed in them in the first place. The one root cause that pops into mind is extrinsic motivation. Expressing love may come differently – forcing your kid to study hard to get into a good school thus a better future. The education system is not like the Canadian education system where ample time is given for the pursuing personal happiness. School starts really early and ends rather late – Western standards wise. Love and acceptance are not the usual standard; luxury goods to appear as if one is of higher status than others, not ever realizing the highest of highs will always be the relative to the lowest of lows. Chinese culture is truly completely different than Western civilization.

One must be subservient to the system to live in the system. Over here in Canada, it is not too different as everyone needs to be part of the world. Just not with extremely high stakes. When it comes to finding a mate, the ladies lust after toy boy actors and athletes. Work ethic, not so much. Having an engineering job does not help with getting laid. Though it does not mean a regular guy can not get hitched. The wacky world of demand and supply knows no bounds. As demand is often multidimensional, supply on the contrary is a single solution. To satisfy a multidimensional demand requires a compromise as no supply can satisfy everything. The ladies have to pick a regular guy for their personality mostly because women value content more than packaging. Some ladies in a Discovery Channel documentary was like this guy is not the best looking but he is a top dog. No matter what one's ambitions are, one eventually ebbs into the world.

Not all supply can be used as no process is completely efficient. Ice cubes have to come in coolers for picnics. Supply-chains all inevitably have residues. That is unfortunate but life. Various reasons arise of course, such as we live in a world that encourages competition, intense competition that some people are simply not suitable to compete against each other. There are stories of homeless people wanting alcohol over food. There are also stories of people who are more than willing to give the homeless people money but rather not as the charitable believe the money will be spent on drugs. It must be terrible to be homeless. Though in a society where everything costs money, there will be at least some people who disagree with the system. If they do not change, they will at least meet their end. That is the problem with all supply, it is never perfect because inefficiencies carry over, magnifies or amplified with each step. Much like loading cabinets into a semi. If the cabinets are not aligned horizontally at the beginning and if the cabinets are pushed in too far, the gaps will only get bigger. It may be the reason why anything in the extremes of the normal distribution usually have a defect or traits that shows the culmination of flaws from the entire fundamental process. Inevitably, there will be residues as no system is absolutely efficient.

Supply must satisfy all levels of demand though not necessarily completely. To pick the right supply, demand has to be reduced down to a single all-encompassing variable. That variable is what gives the system the best now and the best into future. A decision a human being makes must both give satisfaction presently into the future and possibly unwrite the past. Like a career choice, it has to make one happy, it also has to pay-off in the future. Pursuing an acting career is a risky endeavour. Start off small then make it big. Though not everyone makes it to the silver screens. The odds are slim. If this person is the right person for the job then it should not be too difficult to achieve success. Another example would be the machines humans create. Just using the machines wear it out. Exposure to the world wears it out. At some point, the machine has to be maintained or replaced. Machines used to satisfy a demand are usually not put to use in the best interest of preserving the system. It always has to be maintained and repaired when the disorder of the world meets the system. The multi-dimensional nature of demand makes picking out a supply difficult if done step by step.

A dead tree falls or an animal dies in the wilderness, it provides sustenance for the bottom-feeders who become food for other, usually bigger organisms. Everything gets reused. Maybe if the money accumulated at the top of the social hierarchy were to be naturally felled like a dying tree then the people at the bottom would benefit. It usually starts with investing in a business. Though the hard-earned cash of anyone should not be given away lightly. When someone dies that money has to go somewhere. Large amounts of money have the potential to become rates, a very large rate enough to flood the valleys; enough to flood people out of poverty for a very short and insignificant amount of time. It must be released somehow before depreciation kicks-in. Rather conflicting when billionaire choose to give away their money. It does show these people have gone beyond the norm to transcend the weights, the pressure the world places on their shoulders. However, because they earned it, they probably should not give it away. Maybe it is better for their kids to not have all that money as people have not so innocent intentions. At some point, when all demands are satisfied, one starts proceeding to the next level and begin thinking about others. If rates accumulated, it takes systems to their next level. Supply makes this phenomenon possible. The system goes to the next level only when supply is greater than demand or when the source is greater than the sink to allow a surplus. Everything comes full circle to complete a cycle.

Supply that can duplicate itself are usually more prone to error as the process is often complicated enough that error can easily be introduced into the process to be duplicated until it becomes a visually noticeable error. For any supply that can duplicate itself sexually, there arises the ethical question of who should reproduce. The people who pass on their genes will often determine the shape of the species. Is it better to have the fittest people pass on their genes or just people who are fit enough to function? Did the ancient Greeks see hope a little differently than how we see it today? Hope is passed down from one generation to the next. Hope is fragile yet when combined together it is the most powerful element in human existence. The Olympic fire symbolizes human kindness and compassion. At least that is what it is perceived now. Did the Ancient Greeks see it as should these athletes spread their seeds, we shall all benefit? All these Greek tragedies can not help make one think the Ancient Greeks saw these athletes as the cream of the crop which they somewhat are, though did the ancient Greeks understand how the extraordinary arises from the ordinary? Plato believed only the best should reproduce with the best. The rest should be kept in the dark regarding this matter. In the Western world, one is to stay home if sick to not infect anyone else. Should people with disabilities or mental illnesses such as schizophrenia not pass on their genes? The problem with that attitude is that the illness does not always manifest itself in the next generation. Nobody truly knows what the baby will grow up to be. The other question is, should dumb people be allowed to have children? The problem with implementing that idea is again, the extraordinary arises from the ordinary. This phenomenon is the irrefutable observable truth. If these people are taken out of existence, then the raw materials required to make the cake is gone. Surely, cake can be made from just the crème de la crème or can it? There are no cakes made purely out of frosting. Using current society standards to judge the quality of a human being is a big no. It judges how well the human beings fits into the system as a cog, not necessarily the reproductive potential. Nature have found a way to bypass human bias. More on this subject will explored later. Essentially, the reproduction process is suspected to be a three-piece optimization process – definitely not a process of picking the best parts but the right parts. This idea is a better explanation of why the extraordinary arises from the ordinary. Consistency inevitably comes at a trade-off between quantity: the greater the supply, quantitatively, the greater the variation.

Manufacturing and industrial baking are comparable. Large batches of baked are manufactured as they are processed through an assembly line. To create the final product, the ingredient must all come together to create a whole. Cake is comprised of flour, sugar, butter, eggs, and milk – usually, there are always flourless cakes. Cake can become fancier, though the base ingredients stays the same give or take. The process is chemistry, following the recipe is crucial. The base cake must be – must be cake – before adding on decorations. The foundation must be solid before adding anything to it or it will not support whatever goes on. Believe or not, the same can be said when producing humans. A solid foundation must be there before adding any traits or functional accessories. Any trait is good so long as it is beneficial. Through design, the extraordinary human beings of this Earth can arise is realized as even the grandest architecture are built from the materials drawn out of the Earth. The question is how one puts it all together. Extraordinary not just by athleticism or looks, by also intelligence and the grace of inner beauty. Design not in the same sense as fashion designers but in the sense of a person with an engineering background. The strength in this argument is to boil down many variables into a singular variable. The way nature intended it to be. Eugenics as the Nazis believed it is obviously wrong though where is the proof to challenge this ideology? Anything requiring multiple manufacturing steps usually requires a foundation.

Supply is and will always be judged relative to a standard. The natural instinct would be to use those standards to match supplies to create more of the supply. The standards are human perception based, even a bias towards how to judge. With colors, it goes blue to blue paint, red to red paint. What about more complicated systems where there is much more than blue to blue paint and red to red paint? Say a human being. How would or should the world, society, the culture norm be to let people reproduce successfully? Of course, there is the subject of personal habits whether people choose to persist in the face of adversity such as not divorcing over subtle personal differences as they can be difficult to overlook. The key to satisfaction is the master variable. Once the master variable is satisfied all other variables will trickle down. The best example is looking for a significant other. A man may want to look for a woman who is tall and fit. Though when it comes to personality, he realizes he is not happy with what is before him despite satisfying his physical expectations. The assumption is he is not looking for an one-night stand. Instead, looking for at least a lasting relationship. This man who knows what is good for him, chooses a partner who makes him happy. Happiness is the master variable in this case. The human is the judge of the supply. The human sets the demands. The human then seeks the supply to satisfy demand. To identify all needs is the most important aspect to creating a set of demands. Once the set of demands is created, it needs to be boiled down to a single variable as supply going into a system will result in a product out of the system. This product could be a supply for another system. What is the master variable for this entire process that if satisfied will satisfy all that is necessary?

Demand is usually not fully satisfied. Close enough is often good enough. Based on the requirements a set of demands that must be met. When a company searches for an employee, they may have a checklist of what the person being interviewed says along with the qualifications and experience he has. In the very simplest of terms, demand is what is required to maintain the system at equilibrium, while supply is what is coming in to main the system at where it currently is. An employee leaves the company. The company must find a suitable replacement for the void left behind to maintain at least the same output they are currently producing. Finding an employee to satisfy every criterion can be difficult. The common saying is to lower one's standards. Finding anyone to satisfy a criterion can be difficult. If one's dating app approach was to swipe right to only the ones one finds absolutely beautiful while no putting in too much effort yourself on the other end, one is not going to get too many results. Matching the systems require both ends to satisfy the demands of each other as a supplier and the person who demands. Although scientific literature does not say if consciousness affects sperm production as the hint from nature is that the gonads are most sensitive to radiation. This idea is important later on, an idea that sperm and eggs as systems must rely on the meshing of not only genes but also the power source to be successful. As much as the idea of a cog in the machine or an ant in the colony is of disdain, each individual piece must work together with each other to create the best possible end results. Each system satisfies their purpose as efficiently as possible.

Supply exists only because there is a demand. It serves to maintain the equilibrium the system requires to stay at the current level. Supply must be satisfied both way which is not only difficult but can also be extremely time consuming. Supply and demand are the harmonious compliment to each other.

##  Optimization

Supply must match demand to a degree – creating the necessary conditions to maintain an equilibrium. If there is not enough supply, the system will collapse on itself to the previous level. Demands arises due to the need to maintain the system in the current state. Demand exists because a sink is drawing out of the system. Another source – the supply – must satisfy the equation. In simplest terms, rates in can result in rates out. While the system, the boundary, must have a quantity within. That quantity in real life can be the heat required to maintain a warm-blooded organism alive. Food enters, to maintain a temperature while heat is dissipated into the environment. Energy in to maintain an accumulation, energy is then dissipated out. How much food is consumed usually varies by the weather given all other conditions are steady. Cold weather usually means eat more food especially if wearing less – not dressing warmly for the weather. The example to support this increased caloric intake is swimming results in increased caloric intake due to exposure to cold water. Equilibriums requires a fine balance between input and output.

Whatever the supply required to fulfill the demands; it must be optimized. The system will adapt to alter the demand – making matching the supply an easier task based on available resources. What is available is usually not ideal as supply often cannot be used fully. Some of the supply cannot satisfy the demand. Even with a high efficiency system such as an electric water heater for the shower, the electrons must return back to the power grid after dissipating the energy into the surrounding water. What the set point is, the equilibrium to an artificial system is usually decided by a human. This act of tapping into the world, not being part of the entire cycle of the system may be the reason humans strain the environment. It piggy backs on the processes not usually found in nature at least not abundantly such as wind or rain. Absolutely not saying fossil fuels are bad as they drive growth by creating readily available energy to the mass and creating jobs. The same can be said for meat production. Abundant food for everyone who wants to eat meat. A chicken in every pot. These productions, these supplies are what is necessary to maintain the world at the equilibrium. That is the way the money flows which is what the people wants. Although undoubtedly, fossil fuels and meat production taxes the environment. The former with green house gases and the latter with the resource intensive supply. Although growing plants would also tax the environment. Even growing plants for food must be optimized.

In the Western world, life is perceived as short. One must enjoy everything as much as possible. In this case, excess supply forces the system to adapt to new equilibrium points via saturation. Excess caloric intake leads to increased body fat. Excess or missing supply will turn positive or negative potential respectively which will inevitably result in positive or negative rates when released. Eating too much will cause weight gain which is incredibly obvious while eating too little will cause weight loss which is again, incredibly obvious as people sadly die from hunger everyday. Although there is the matter of cravings due to not getting enough protein and green leafy vegetables. Inevitable health problems will result from both extremes as malnutrition can also cause death. The question is, where is the goldilocks zone? How does nature recognize demand and supply? How does nature recognize demand and how does nature recognize the right supply out of the vast world to satisfy it? The answer may not be how, it may lie in the balance of the world. How people perceive life in the West creates the hedonistic attitude of certain people living there.

The brain is currently modelled as a neural network. Can one throw in fuzzy logic into the network because a neuron's firing speed varies with the neuron's thickness? Can one also chuck discrete components into the network because neurotransmitters have specific purposes? If such a neural fuzzy logic network with discrete components exits it would then have linguistic variables as a foundation in tandem with emotions produced via chemical reactions making thought vary speed wise. Neuron like teeth must come in different sizes. By observation, a person with long teeth that are big will speak in a way that is loud in the sense that the voice is greater amplitude wise. This phenomenon could be due to the length and thickness of the neurons which could be due to the power source. More on this matter will be explored later. The best example of speech varying with teeth is Kobe Bryant who speaks like the way described. Fuzzy logic can achieve what conventional PID controllers can not though they are not good for all cases. Perhaps why human beings are rarely good at many things but only really good at just a few things. To extend fuzzy logic to all cases, neural network can be introduced. If one browses YouTube, one can usually find videos of using neural network to finish a single video game level. It usually is only one level as it takes a while for the program to learn the game level. The neural network does not adapt so well to the next level. If fuzzy logic is introduced into the neural network, can it theoretically recognize the general case? Combined with memory, will it be able to learn like a human? The input is evaluated based on how much it eclipses the expected. Based on how much is eclipsed, the signal processed at the node will have output of varying degree. The things in life bringing the most joys will have different effects on the conscious than what is boring. This phenomenon could be because each and every nervous system is different where a full eclipse of input to the expected will vary by the individual which could explain why everyone has different tastes. The expected is based on the structure of the neuron system.

A single node will have difference magnified substantially should all the node be plentiful enough to form a brain. A fundamental error in the nodes magnified via a large quantity may lead to what is different than normal. Human beings unlike wild animals are more disability prone. These humans live among us because people choose life over death. Hope over despair. These disabilities can be difficult to predict with modern technology at least before the baby is conceived. If the right sperm and the right egg can be picked out of the pile that would be ideal. Editing genomes may not be ideal as the entire genome may need to compliment one another. A gene or two may be fine, large chunks may have unintended consequence on the level of the being. That is merely just a guess based on how systems generally function. Especially complex systems with many parts. Human beings are animals which are relatively complicated systems. If the human being can be analyzed then most other life forms on Earth should not be a problem. Human beings are the best example as there are many of them in plain sight. As to why would anyone need to conduct human experiments like the Nazis did is rather difficult to comprehend. If the fundamental relationship is not clear then building upon the observations with experience and knowledge is not possible as there is no solid foundation – there is no cake made purely out of frosting. The arguments would collapse on itself the higher one chooses to go. The details would begin to contradict. Not only would the arguments lack validity, they would no get very far and it would most likely be wrong. Small initial errors create humongous problem later on.

Capacitors blows up with excess electricity while cans implode if the pressure within decreases below atmospheric pressure. No system can successfully accept all input. The number of different possible permutations in the universe can not all be registered in a single system. An entirely mechanical system made of plastic usually cannot conduct electricity. A human can not ingest poison or face the risk of death. Input to a system is like the keys that release what is locked away. Unregistered input can act like locks to block the system from functioning the way it was intended to. Neurotoxins from animals can stop heart rate. Anthrax becomes spores under unfavourable conditions only to resume its fatal form under the right conditions. Environmental input to the system triggers a cascade of changes in the spore. Much like a ball that can be flattened to be thrown as a disk only to resume the shape of the ball during midflight. Systems can transition between forms. Silk worms goes from worm to cocoon to moth. The cycle then starts all over again with the next generation. Almost like how humans are born, become competent at a skill or skills, work, and reproduce. Except human usually do not spin silk around themselves into a cocoon and morph into a winged-creature. At least not literally, people go through phases. The adolescent brain goes through numerous developmental changes. The balance between what is within to the environment dictates a system's response.

The internal component within a system that transforms input into output is the centrepiece of optimization. Demand from the top trickles down to that internal component. The car engine determines what is the maximum input that can trickle down from the driver. The engine is usually designed to satisfy a criterion. Usually, for most systems, it is the power source that must be optimized as this component creates a demand based on the needs of the systems it supports. A supply must be met that is just right. This internal component must have minimum storage. Enough storage to give room to allow things to expansion – it can not have excess accumulation because it must be as lean as possible. Excessive fat on the human heart is not good. The human heart is then the centerpiece where all other systems are built around.

How to control the output of the system relative to the input is usually through some form of regulatory process. There is a process called feedback control. Input is decreased relative to the output where the greater the match between the two, the lesser the difference. The input and output difference are amplified via a PID controller: proportional, integral, and derivative. Most controllers are PID. A vast majority of the PID are simply proportional. If it works, is there a need to improve it. A system must be able to accept the input to process the input. The input must be compatible – it must be a permutation that is accepted and regulated. The easiest way to optimize is with proportion: amplifying rates. Some cases will require placing close enough to the source. Like ice cubes to cool down a drink. Which method is better is usually a matter of time and personal preferences. Rates to rates. Rates to the accumulation that will become demand via maintaining an equilibrium. Supply to demand to maintain an equilibrium. Optimization.

To optimize demand and supply, demand must be reduced down to a single variable. The decision that give the best in the long run and the short run. Satisfying the demand requires a continuous stream of supply to off-set the demand arising from the sink drawing out of the system. In that way, rates are more important to well-being of a system than what has been accumulated. If there is the luxury to cultivate potential to yield a fruitful result later on then by all means, do just that. If an employee is a worthy investment in the sense that he has the right attitude and shows potential, the by all means hire him. The delicate balance between what humans wants and the human resource must somehow be struck. The act itself is an art much like interest rates. If too high, no customer. If too low, loose money. The approach – narrowing down to one variable – is holistic. Not one heavily emphasizing algorithm.

Rates are the most important element to the survival of a system as rates are instantaneous, instant gratification. Though amassing a big rate is no easy task as it requires a large structure to conduct rates in the first place. What has accumulated can become rates though it takes time. That time may at time mean if the system begins or stops. The ability to seek out rates is often better than carrying a lot of accumulation. The ability to make money in a short time span is better than having hordes of money as accumulation can be lost much like how money can be spent or body fat percentage can drop. Then again, if one had a lot of accumulated, it could theoretically draw a tiny bit from the environment. That tiny bit if large enough relative to the individual, one can subsist from it. Like living off the dividends off a large investments or large objects draw objects towards them via gravity. Systems in nature are usually lean in the sense they rely more on rates than accumulation such as fat. Human systems are best lean with enough reservoir to cover the time required to bring a system of rates back online should resources become scarce. How much to accumulate is how one wishes to exist optimized in this world dependant. Rates inwards help alleviate the rates going outwards.

Rates are easier to optimize than accumulation. Rates comes in streams even if what is entering is discrete. The amount entering a system can be matched over a time average. It may be a little bit too much or not enough at first but over a time period it averages out to the right number. Matching accumulation to rates is harder though not as hard as matching stockpile to stockpile. The reason matching anything other than rates to rates is difficult is primarily because accumulations is something not always easy to estimate or predict accurately. It always requires a degree of experience. The most common everyday example is the charcoal barbeque. With experience, the amount of coal can be estimated. Most of the time, there will always be some coals left over. Transforming accumulation into the right number of rates magnifies the error. Optimizing accumulation to accumulation is the most difficult as the right estimates of what something will become are like weather predictions. If right, great. If wrong, bad investments. Rates are easier to optimize because they are assumed to be consistent while accumulation may dissipate inconsistently.

If one must match accumulations together say when the world ends or one is responsible for ensuring food security in famine-stricken places, then try to convert into rates by spreading out over a time average. Better yet, create a source to produce rates. The easier way could be the vice versa, see how much rates there is over a time span. Then use the collected data to match things together. Two problems with this approach. The data may not exist as it could be something new. The approach may not work for every changing system such as human beings and the system human beings inhabit. Human beings change with every generation. If one can rely on old data to predict the future, if the system is stable enough, that is the safest bet. By converting accumulation into predicted rates, one can have multiple sources to alternate and switch to match demand. The task is difficult because there are multiple forms of demand. The best supply for one job will likely not satisfy the demand for another job. Accumulation does make storage easier as rates is more time dependant which makes transportation easier.

##  Minimization

The sensation of hot is a positive while the sensation of cold is a negative. All relative to a human being. Things get hotter with friction. Rubbing hands together generates heat. This phenomenon is due to the imperfections of the material clinging to each other as they brush past each other. The kinetic energy of the molecule, how they vibrate in place. Enthalpy is a thermodynamics' term. Though there is not enough certainty to put the process down on a board to write equations with absolute precision, one does not always need to invent clever solutions or write complex mathematical equations. Being able to recognize when a solution is stupid and inventing general rules of thumb to save time suffices for this purpose. If an automobile manufacturing company wants to test the safety of their cars. They just ram the cars to see what happens. Unlike a scientific paper where there is absolute precision, a rule of thumb method to seeing the world, to make quicker decisions, is presented. Certain view points are minimized while others are enforced to realize the Western world's full potential.

Enthalpy, in this case, is a term borrowed from thermodynamics. Not necessarily the internal energy plus pressure multiplied by volume. Taking a broader perspective is how much energy is required to sustain the system in its current state and how much work it can do against the environment. If the system has enough energy stored to work against the environment, it will change the environment. That is how it will be part of the environment. If the system does not have enough to overcome the environment, it will not assume its full form, it will be crushed by the environment. That is how it will be part of the world. Much like putting a telescope in space requires considering how zero-gravity will alter the lenses' shape once the telescope is space borne. The examples in humans are those who go on to be part of the world by changing it or being a cog in the system. Enthalpy always goes to a minimum.

To take on the environment a system inhabits, it needs to have an internal force to at least overcome forces such as gravity or atmospheric pressure. With cases such as foot-binding or tying a board on one's head to make the head flat, the human is not built to overcome that. The human mind is wonderful in many ways just like how nature has both things that cause good and harm to the human being. With human beings, we are not too much different from each other physically as we all have limbs, eyes, brains, and so on. At least normally. Human beings may be extremely sensitive to initial conditions. The brain consists of many neurons, one tiny difference, one tiny fault or change in how the neurons is grown in the brain may be greatly amplified. It may all manifest in the conscious, in the human psych as attitude. Whether the neurons that make the limbic system are indeed systems that have great difficulty firing a signal strong enough to overcome the tempest that is the world that the tiniest of difference is magnified is only food for thought for now. To take on something, one must have a reserve to expand above the resources required to sustain a foundation.

For a system that grows, it must overcome the pressure the environment puts on it or the gravity a planet exerts on it. On a planet with stronger gravity, would life need to walk on more than two legs to support itself or maybe bigger legs? The question for life on other planets should they exists is that what if the permutations for life in this universe is only one set? What if all the planets in the habitable zone only support one set of fundamental chemical reaction laws. Only permitting life to develop the exact same way as it is on Earth? Silicon-based life forms is a possibility. Since no one knows if there is life on other planets, the answer will be known only when alien life is discovered, if it exists and whether or not they are identical to what is on Earth. A living being assumes its unique form through grows against what restrains it.

The cells in the organism push against the forces holding it back. The forces going against the forces holding a cell back is unique to the individual. How the forces create the result must be a question of demand and supply. A demand is created trickling down. The power source needs to work at the presumed maximum to satisfy the demand, to power everything else in the system. Power source works at a maximum should be the case because the system must assume a structure where future maximum power source would not disrupt the current system's structure. The system must grow to the maximum from the push from the power source. Grab parts and mix them together. The question becomes will the power source be compatible to the rest of the system? The common everyday example being the car where the car engine to transmission is absolutely crucial or even car engine to generator. Putting a truck engine in a sedan would result in too much power. In a system like the car, the structure must be already designed to optimize the power source. The optimization process is not to different for life as organisms are still systems requiring a power source – simplifying them to a manageable number variable is not trivial. Through the struggle against the restraining force lets an aggregation assume a certain specific shape.

Down Syndrome is one of the afflictions of the human condition. The reason to why people afflicted with Down Syndrome is due to an extra chromosome. What about a more detailed explanation? One based on the input and output and how input is processed. The proposed reason for the facial likeness in people with Down Syndrome is one modelled on demand and supply. At this point, whether the demand is too basic or the supply is only just enough to satisfy the demand at the fundamental level requires further research. Whatever the demand and supply, they eclipse only at the level where the most basic is produced. By this hypothesis, the fundamental face structure of every human is that of the Down Syndrome one. The power source converting supply into the required energy for the structure is not working at the maximum or the structures using the energy is only fundamental in the sense that it does not go any further than basic power usage. The conversion process is likely to generate a force as the by product. This explanation is a simpler thus better though not comprehensive.

The number of rates required – sustaining the system plus the accumulated forces it has to do work on or against the environment. The best example falls back to a person living in a capitalist society. Expenses drains his wallet and income fill his wallet. Essentially, there is a rate of money entering and exiting. A bit or a lot of money is leftover depending on who one is. That is the money that can be used to do as one please. Usually for Westerners, it is spending the money while for Easterners, it is usually saving the money. Some people smoke a pile of marijuana and drink a dozen beers in their spare time. Being at the bottom puts one at risk. This person has little future to borrow from. His time in the future will worth only a little more than what it is worth now. What he does with his life is none of anyone else's concern. Even if he gets lung or liver cancer, it is still none of anyone else's concern. The rates coming in must have a little remaining to support anything above the foundation.

The more complicated a system is, the more rates it will need to support itself as the foundation requires sustenance while what lives on top of the foundation will also require rates for instantaneous gratification. Fundamental drives such as food and water rule the baseline while needs such as a dozen beers a day and a pile of marijuana are secondary. The foundation determines the base rates going in and out, while what live on top determines the flux the system can do against the environment it lives in. Robots should they become advance enough, requires a foundation to support itself both hardware and software wise. The robot needs legs, a base for it be steady and then the secondary components to carry out the functions. Same case for software as the code need an interface between hardware to software before higher level software. In systems such as robots, the component and the codes are specifically designed to satisfy a purpose. The process is still more transparent than life itself. Organism such as mammals grow from fertilization to adulthood. If nothing goes wrong, it grows into a healthy adult. The neural foundation only allows certain structures – becoming certain behaviours – it can only be called instinct. The signals flowing from the brain can only assume one form much like a river flows into the ocean. The shape and structure of the river determines how the water flows or the shape and structure of a hose determines how the water flows through it. If a bunch of hoses were formed into a vast complicated system, the twist and turns and the interconnectivity will result in the out flow of water to be highly specific. So specific it does not need to be taught how to output the water the way it is. A foundation with something on top requires rates for the instantaneous and ideally not too much accumulation for times when rates are not available.

If a system is all rates like a river, then it is transportation suited. If a system is all potential then it just came into this world. That claim is debatable as a baby who just came into the world exchanges heat with the environment. In the most figurative sense, a baby is all potential as the common perception is that a baby has infinite potential. How a baby goes from infinite potential to homeless is a mystery. In previous chapters, small and subtle differences can be magnified substantially. That is a merely speculation as what is this small subtle difference? No body has taken out the brains of homeless people to study them in the hopes of avoiding such a tragedy. The other question being is it really genetic? It really shows how much as a society we really care about others. People are rather apathetic towards homelessness. The philosophical nature of the state, whether it should provide shelter for the homeless or not. These people living on the fringes of society probably needs the most help. The people endure needless suffering much like homosexuals suffer in Stone Age countries or even here in developed countries where parents shun them. Seeing people who suffer where one can not really help them makes one question oneself as a person. It also makes one question the nature of capitalism and whether Karl Marx was right about how society would eventually progress from capitalism to socialism to communism. Although Karl Marx did not look like he knew what he was doing as a lot of people have died because of his ideas. It is not necessarily about class or money but to provide everyone with a better life. Why providing everyone with a better life is important will be discussed later on. Money was invented to make things simpler. Money is a voting system. Though the majority of people who cast the votes can only go on about their lives. Money quantifies resources and exchanges of services. The rates of money coming in and out to maintain the foundation. How the money enters the system to create pockets of potential will determine the humanness of the system. These pockets of potential, on top of the foundation, can be built upon as they minimize themselves. The potential on top of the foundation has the capacity to push against the environment when tapped into. The end result is that a system become rates suited.

The accumulation on top of a foundation during its development is what allows a system to take its unique shape. The effect usually only occurs for systems that grows. Static and unchanging systems are often just foundations with different components stacked on top. The most common example is the car. Suspension with the components sitting on top. It does not grow it its final shape, it is assembled. How about an economical system? How about comparing capitalism to communism? Why one succeeded while the other has failed, at least generally speaking. Kim-Jong Un is still going at it with his regime which is nothing compared to the wealth and abundance of the United States of America. Sure, North Korea has nukes – does that mean anything when those nukes can not be used without enormous consequences? Not much information is available regarding North Korea save for a few words from defectors. A few of my relatives live near the Chinese-North Korean border. That is too close to Kim-Jong Un and his nuke and missile testing in my opinion. A truck would once in a while carry presumably food – would cross the border which shows even a communist regime require input and output: rates. That is because human beings are inherently creatures of flux. A sealed off system with no flux housing human beings will not work as human beings not only require food and water but stress and stimulation as well. Even the self-sustaining shrimp jars sold at the aquariums requires maintaining a certain temperature range. Now back to the two economical systems. One must begin with the foundations of these system, what both systems have in common: people. Human beings are born into this world without choice. They begin as a fertilized egg then divide into a structure. Once a human being come into the world: it must east, drink, and keep warm to not die. At first this all come from the primary caretaker. Usually the parents. The eating, drinking, and keeping warm is to adjust what goes in and out of the system which has a power supply to keep the systems functional. Some of that, a small percentage of it, is accumulated to enable growth: structures processing more complicated input and produce the concordant output. A small portion of rates becomes accumulation which in turn with the right forces pushing against the forces holding it back creates a system born out of the equilibrium between these two-opposing forces. The system, because the way it is built, is rates, conduction, transportation heavy. If humans were not flux heavy and potential heavy, obesity would be the norm; people would function without health problems if such were the case. Uniqueness is born out of the slight fundamental foundational differences that goes on to become the extensions. In fact, if life were not rates based, there would be a lot of obese animals. Putting excessive stress on the skeletal structure. Except for seals, walruses, and bears. Their structure is still movement suited even while carrying fat deposits. It also depends on the rates the environment creates. Colder environments usually have bigger, stockier animals. Hotter environments usually have animals with long limbs to dissipate heat. The system must maintain an equilibrium. Back to the subject of why communism does not work. Human beings are still inherently animals and animals are still systems. Human beings have structures born out physical processes. These structures process input to release output. In humans, it is the brain that is responsible for this input and output in relationship to the environment. The brain is a structure that grew out of a fertilized egg. A certain rate goes in, some of the rate leaves while others remains to become part of the brain to make the brain grow. Rates accumulate, the way it accumulates is decided by the foundation. It becomes little pockets where the accumulated can shape nearby structures into different shape and sizes by both becoming rates again and competing for space. The accumulated, given it is within the vicinity of another accumulated, will shift its position assume the space is well used. Only a certain number of pockets should exist given a finite space. If there is too much clustered into an area, they begin to compete for space – with the biggest pushing the smaller ones aside because the bigger potentials dissipate into bigger systems as the nature of accumulation is to become a minimum via becoming the forces pushing adjacent structure into its final shape. The not so obvious reason that communism does not work is because of the rates which creates the foundation of any system. Communism reduces rates to bare basics. The resulting foundational structure is also bare basic as rates flowing across it will be not be sophisticated because the structure is inherently simple. The rates that accumulates is not enough to make the area full. Creating bigger accumulations such as the government, military might be easier, but the smaller systems such as small businesses will be more difficult to create. If one had a jar, one fill it up with large rock first then put in the sand to it up to the brim. Once full, close the lid and shake it all you like; the rocks will not smash the jar. Communism is like filling the jar with only large rocks. Close the lid and shake it, one will have shards of glass in his palm. The bigger systems with the boundaries tax the enclosing system too much in communism. Without reliable rates dissipating into the crevasses, transportation and the productions of goods would be difficult. The nature of the universe is motion not being stationary.

##  Maximization

How a system develops against the forces confining it is a process with its final form determined by entropy. The chaos, the tendency for a system to go to maximum entropy and minimum enthalpy is universally true for all chemical systems. At least that is what is taught in high school chemistry. Presumably, educators would not lie to children or there would be enormous consequences not only for the educator but for the future of this society. Children inherit the world from their parents. The expected behaviour of the system, however, is that the accumulated has to overcome the forces holding it back must go to a minimum while the rates of the system increases. The general system proceeds towards maximum rates and minimum accumulation. If one wanted a huge pile of money, one would usually have to make a humongous system that can conduct a humongous number of rates. In simpler terms, a large economy. The process of the accumulated going to a minimum releases rates which in turn shapes the system. The final shape of the system is determined by how much maximum rates the system can sustain. The greater the rate, the greater the disorder required to create the necessary structures.

Imagine a system. Within the boundary is a power source converting one form of energy into another. The boundary of the system is let us say two-dimensional and a perfect circle. Purely for easy visualization. The system duplicates itself. The system grows every so often. There is a rate going in and out of the system. The rates inside the system becomes accumulation which in turn remains in the system to become rates again within the system. The accumulation pushes the system as the accumulated must go to the minimum. For the accumulated to minimize, it decreases quantitatively by dissipating which in turn pushes system boundaries should there be no exit for this dissipating rate. That growth is the system going to minimum. At some point of the growth, the dissipation within the boundary strikes a balance between the boundary holding the system back and the forces acting on it due to the environment. Nothing more can enter from that point on. If no extended forces or forces holding it together existed, the system would continue to expand. The maximum disorder the system can sustain within an equilibrium inside the environment it inhabits determines the shape of the system. The fundamental rates and accumulation are demand and supply determined. The final behaviour of rate is a maximum while the final behaviour of accumulation is a minimum.

We have gone over a single system. What about systems within systems or how this final shape of the system is judged by human beings? Let us begin with the latter. Technically, this book is more regarding system that grow and how nature designs life. Not necessarily how to design life. Though if one understands how nature designs and if the field of how genes functions as a whole became clear then one could design life down to the very last detail. Theoretically. Just that it may take a lot of research. If a designer baby was created, is humanity going to accept it for what it is? From the top-down level, all it takes is optimizing the demand and supply – creating the foundation and then embedding the desired traits that will work in synergy with the foundation. Humans naturally do this process just that the traits appear to be random achieved through genetic recombination and mutations. Selection then occurs afterwards. The extraordinary often arises from the ordinary. Mind that extraordinary and ordinary are terms in the human conscious, born out of the comparison between the averages to the tail-ends of the normal distribution. Whether a system works or does not is probably more important than how well it will be perceived by other human beings. Hopefully, a single system has been covered to this point.

What about the topic of beauty? Mathematicians devised this formula called The Golden Ratio. If the division of the measured values is a certain number then this is object is considered beautiful. For system that grow into its final form being beautiful, satisfying this ratio, often have advantages over other systems. In human beings especially, being beautiful can land jobs as models, actor, or win beauty pageants which can open up many doors. Actors are looks first, memory second, and acting skills third. Skills can be developed. Although there may be many different final parts to a system that grows, they all share the same power sources and a code determining demand. The demand comes from the code, while the fundamental supply comes from the power source. If these two matches, the system grows to the fullest. The potential that accumulates gives the system its unique shape as the accumulated disperses into rates. The accumulated pushes each other apart. As to why one system comes out to be perceived beautiful while another is perceived other wise is still a mystery. The guess is that the eclipse of demand and supply will determine how system grows. How these two factors eclipse will determine the final result of the system in the end. How it will be perceived as beautiful.

Regarding the question of beauty, very often, one can see a man who is considered to be less attractive being with a woman who is considerably more attractive. Many theories suggest why women inherit beautiful traits. All those fairy tales regarding how the prince marrying poor girls. Does one see it as love knows no boundaries or hypergamy? Marrying up the social status quo is what hypergamy essentially is. In the wild, a pack of females mate only with the top dog. Somewhat that in human beings as well. From observations of people on three continents, marrying someone rich may not necessarily produce a healthy child. The natural method to creating optimized system is the rush of activities experienced in the brain. Much like how two general systems have similar compatible structural foundations, the rates and accumulation constitute a similar foundation. Similar enough, the two systems can mix to create another system with similar foundations but different traits or accessories tacked on. In sum, the people who, out of passion, create life, have better odds of creating only a healthy child but also one on the tail end of the probability curve. These people are more likely to nurture than abandon.

Seeing a man with a woman who is more attractive than he is, is a common sight. The guy must have it together. If it really is the rush of neural activities in the brain when two compatible system come together, women must at least want or find attractive who is fit and well put together. The demand is multi-dimensional. To boil it all down, require boiling every decision down to the one that gives maximum hope. What may give maximum happiness now and into the future. Most guys who can give happiness in the moment may not bring brings happiness in the long-run as they may be broke. Those who bring happiness in the long-run may not be the most well put together. The inevitability of the human condition. Often a maximum rate fizzles with time as with the case of short-term happiness. Maximum rates may occur later as accumulation eventually gets around to be released. As with the terms of long-term happiness. Either everything is released immediately to fizzle out in the near future or accumulation is released after some time. Requiring accumulation to dissipate slowly which can be difficult as another is there to tax this system in the worst-case scenario. Two systems exchange with each other to compliment each other. Instead of seeking a source, a stockpile to ingest to release into rates, the other system provides the necessary rates. Certain negative sources can not be satisfied alone. Men usually mate with someone more attractive than they are.

Western civilization can only continue if immigrants are brought in to increase the population, to mix with the so-called local population. How will it continue in the face of adversity is something people who built the Western world would know: hope and reason. The hope is these people who built this world are not immigrant dependant to providing solutions. From the looks of their world, they probably are fresh ideas dependant at least. One can only take the foundational system to a certain point before what lives on top of the foundation starts to not play nice with each other. A small portion of the population will always not be good enough. All systems must go to their maximums and minimums. How the system transitions from the initial form to their final form is often the most dangerous period as the system is extremely sensitive. Some people unfortunately go on to commit murder. Some people can channel it productively. That is how life is. Everyone is forced into the same container as smaller containers within a larger container. Some inevitably choose not to participate to become homeless. Not all the homeless want nothing to do with the world. Some are just there by misfortune. Different species survive at the expense of other species. For members of the same species to have some fail while others triumph. Simply amazing how forcing everyone into a system with dire stakes motivates people into action. As if human beings were never good enough for each other in the first place.

First comes the foundation then the parts to make the system more useful. As useful as it is possible. Technically speaking, human beings are animals, and animals are systems within a bigger system: the environment. The particles within a system goes to maximum entropy and minimum enthalpy. It depends on the size of the particles too. A system comprising of small particles will have them move as fast as they possibly can within the boundary of the system. If the system is a mixture of small and big particles, the smaller particles zip around as fast as they can while the bigger particles are forced into a corner. In the real world, bacteria do not necessarily push elephant into a corner or humans multiply so fast they force other species into extinction although extinction may at time happen due to habitat loss. Entropy does play a role in the niche each organism occupies. Bacteria often take advantage of tiny pockets of gaps where the host cannot immediately reach with the immune system or block-off with an accumulation to multiply in a host. Human beings use land in ways wildlife would not. Instead of living on the land the way it is, human choose to erect shelters and carry out symbolic meaning into the even the tiniest things they believe in. It all is in the world of men. The minds of those who inhabit the world. Does anything a human do turns the sun blue? Does anything a human do serves other than self-interest first? No, because there must be an I before a we. At least in the Western world. In humans, the greater the potential one has, the more one becomes a point for flux for what goes in to what goes out of a system. Inevitably, the smaller potentials in the world can zip around the world faster, they are inevitably insignificant as one gone can be replaced by another. Human beings are precious to each other. To the system we create, we are all just cogs, with some cogs in less abundance and possessing greater responsibility than the more common ones. The smaller systems are nimbler as they become smaller structures. These systems are more responsive but less efficient. These smaller systems swarm around larger systems that was born with the potential to become bigger, more efficient and generally less responsive systems. A more accurate term would be the center. The little, more responsive systems implement faster as they are better suited for details. They zip around faster than the bigger systems, they have more means to transfer the accumulated into rates though they may not have much accumulated themselves. The parts making the system useful are embedded into the foundation.

Natural selection is simply entropy in disguise. The system that can head towards maximum entropy gets to conduct maximum rates because it is more compatible to the environment – a smaller system proceeding to the maximums and minimum within a larger system – is selected. In a system, this larger system would vibrate in the space it is confined to. That transfers energy into the adjacent smaller systems. Shocks transferred to basketball in a sea of tennis balls is enough to vibrate the entire system as one. Natural selection obeys the fundamental processes of chemistry.

A good base is making sure the system is organized internally before embedding accessories to the system. They must all reach a balance of rates-to-deposits for the system to reach a point where it can be considered mature. The system must have expanded to the maximum it can expand. Systems can only assume a certain amount of deposit that must proceed to the minimum for it to function efficiently. Deposits are released over a certain timeframe while the supply on the other end is maintaining the equilibrium until the structure is complete. At that point, the structure becomes a vessel, it is rates heavy, ideally transportation suited. In a way, the system approach presented assumes the system is linear. Tacking on another system to it will not affect the system to the point where input does not yield the same scaled output. In certain cases where putting wheels on an object will make it more responsive to pushes or pulls. The foundation still needs to be stable for the system to be in balance. The car base cannot have too much weight on one side. For systems that grow, the question comes down to how does the supply satisfies demand? How will entropy affect the final shape? How will entropy, maximum rates, affect the process of accumulation becoming rates to push the system into the final form? Internal organization will ensure accessories will not be displaced or even exit the foundation.

Imagine blowing up a balloon for the sake of easier visualization. The forces going in from the lungs must overcome the forces the balloon exerts to expel out the air. The air heading towards maximum entropy is not enough to maintain an equilibrium with the forces the balloon exerts and atmospheric pressure. The balloon will revert back to the saggy, empty shape should it be released from the mouth without tying it up. If the balloons themselves had a power source that powered a pump to draw in the air, the balloons would then be self-inflating. If these balloons were a lot of balloons within a humongous balloon, the final shape of the humongous balloon would be balloons within dependant. More specifically, the power source, the accumulated that turn into rates and how demand and supply regulate this deposit that turns into a physical rate. How this potential is regulated will determine the final shape of the balloon enclosing the smaller balloons. If the balloons within were not all the same size, the bigger ones would be pushed to a stationary. Instructions command the balloons to be inflated. Let us just say that or argument sakes whether the pump and power source is controlled by a microprocessor is not that relevant. The other reason that leads to this assumption is that systems will need to let their maximum flow through itself again in the future. That is maximum exertion should not break the system, only pushing it to the point of breaking when different systems are starting to become incompatible with each other. The balloons within are filled. Some cluster together while other are free flowing and independent. The cluster that bind together to form a shape based on the power source. That if this system passed on the power source to the next system, the cluster of cells that bind together will be the same should the power source be working at the maximum. It also depends on the larger all-encapsulating balloon as points with different elasticity will dictate how these cluster of cells will appear to the observer. The power source is working at the maximum to satisfy the demand, if it does not receive enough supply to perform the transform, it will not grow to the maximum. If all the balloons are there to form the necessary clusters, how the clusters are pushed is determined by entropy, the smaller system pushing the bigger systems. If the power source is only getting supplied fundamentally, the shape of the enclosing balloons will look different than a fully developed one. It may have the large cluster that bind together protruding out but it will be the same shape with every system afflicted by such a condition. The human equivalent to this affliction would be Down Syndrome.

# Part II

##  Carbon Machines

The techniques laid down in this book are general. A system – a general system – is assumed then all these little rules and relationships are employed to analyze it. All system has input and output. This rate, once inside the system can accumulate. This accumulation can become rates again inside the system which can push the system to expand beyond its boundaries. This accumulation becomes rates again because accumulation is assumed to go to a minimum while rates a maximum. The analogy is drawn from how enthalpy goes to a minimum in a system while entropy goes to a maximum. How true is the analogy drawn, we will just have to find out by comparing the model to reality? This accumulation inside is determined by how much the maximum rates takes away from the accumulation and how much supply is available to maintain the accumulation: demand and supply. Power is introduced into the system assuming it works at the maximum as the system should not need to expand again in the future when the power source functions again at the maximum. The key assumption here is that the power source is working at the maximum. The supply can vary with what is available. That supply variance could determine the unique shape of the system should the fundamental foundational demand be met. Very bad things will happen if the demand is only satisfied at the fundamental level. In short, if a system has an input and output and it grows, the rates can become accumulation within. Since for one to go the maximum another must go to a minimum, the accumulation inside cannot last forever as accumulation is released as rates within the system causing the system to expand beyond the boundaries. The addition of a power source within a system makes the conversion of one form of rates into accumulation then back into rates quicker. It helps regulates the growth of the system, as the main input must first pass through the power source to become part of the system. If there is excessive input and if the power source goes first, the system would not expand its boundaries. The system would explode if the power source exceeds the boundary threshold. The power source is suspected to determine the shape of the system as it determines the conversion of one form of rates to the other, as the power source determine, the total, the input limit which in turn become the structure of the system. Though one should never generalize, the subject makes it inevitable.

A system seeks the lowest energy state. When surrounded, they achieve such by dissipating energy into the adjacent should energy transfer be permitted – forcing the adjacent to become the necessary structures facilitating the maximum rates resonating with the energy source. A power source within a system would then naturally dictate the optimal distribution of an aggregation or aggregations of the system subsisting-off the power source. The shape of the aggregation would then be determined by the power source functioning at the maximum. In other words, if ones had a cluster of weakly magnetic marbles with the marbles being able to generate an electric charge from within that can overcome the magnetic force clustering the marbles together. The power source within generating the maximum electrical charge would dictate the optimal distribution of this marble cluster should the marbles not simply fly into space or just an asteroid entering atmosphere.

Imagine a very small system requiring a microscope to see. The system is essentially invisible to the naked eye. If many and many of the system pile together, it will be visible to the naked eye. This tiny system is centered around the power source. It can divide and replicate itself. Whatever it needs to replicate itself starts with what is coming in to the power source to fuel the entire process. The system is trying to divide, it needs to push from within to complete the job. The system has specific structures to pull the system apart into two. The energy for the structure comes from the power source. It would not come from anywhere else. The system has internal instructions to determine how these tiny systems will specialize. For now, let us assume they all to become the same system dealing with same rates. This system, beginning from one, double every so often. The catch is that this is all forming the foundation before it grows. The entire structure begins with a tiny system that replicates itself. The system forms a base by replicating itself many times. It then shoots up from the bottom by replicating itself at the bottom to push the base up. The small systems are free to make its own boundaries and expand to the maximum power source dependant. Since this cluster of systems is not subjected to a boundary, it grows not according to the tension of the boundary, the weak or strong points in the boundary, it grows according to maximums and minimum governed by the power source. If this system can reproduce sexually and a female or male passed on the power source combined together. The resulting structure would be a mixture of shapes from the male and female side. Through how power is used, we can deduct the nature of very small systems by seeing their similarities with bigger systems.

If this tiny system were to be replaced with cells or more specifically human cells, we can draw some interesting conclusions. A cell can be approximated by the contents within by drawing a boundary to envelope it. What goes in and out is the rate. Over a time-average, what is within the cell can be approximated as a quantity. For now, this quantity is assumed to be the net electrical charge. It could be fluidic pressure as well. This net electrical charge is the accumulation. The power source is the mitochondria. Since in most cases the mitochondria are inherited maternally, this accumulation is also the same as the mother should the power source be at the maximum at a certain body part in the human system. Given the boundary enclosing the cells final shape of the structure the cluster of cells go to their maximums and minimums. For a structure that grows at the maximum from a seed like a point within the system, the shape of this structure should be exactly like how the power source dictates should the power source be functioning at the maximum in this part of the system. Since the power source is at the maximum, the shape would then be inherited maternally. By assuming adult teeth grows at the maximum rate given how fast teeth grows, adult teeth shape is then inherited maternally unless mitochondria mutation or paternal transmission of the mitochondria occurs. In the former case, adult teeth shape will be different than the mother. In the latter case, adult teeth shape will be a mixture of shape between the father and the mother. Out of the dozen people observed, only one person did not have their adult teeth shape inherited maternally. This person had the symptoms of mitochondrial illness and his adult teeth are a mixture of shape between his father and mother. Deviations from expected adult teeth shape may be a good indicator of mitochondrial illness.

During the observations of the dozen people, it was noticed people have a baseline voice that when paired with another produced the various teeth arrangement and gum line ratios. Adding or decreasing this baseline voice demonstrates various degrees of emotions or emotional state. An angry, openly aggressive response corresponds to an increase in amplitude of the baseline voice and even behaviour over a shorter time. Essentially, the act is done with greater power than usual to expand more energy than the baseline voice. A depressed response corresponds to usually a smaller amplitude, less power, less energy released in that time span. A very disturbing correlation is seen with gum line of the child and how the two parents' voice match. If the amplitude is perfectly matched, then the child will have "ideal" gum lines, that the gum lines and teeth are in perfect ratio. Picture perfect at least. To people who understand being happy is the most important thing in life, gum line in a potential partner is not a huge deal. Voice, however, demonstrate what goes on within and what on within is heavily tied to happiness. What this observation suggests it that what goes on in the human mind can have an effect on physical outcome. That is for the moment, the gum lines. This voice phenomenon is, again, only true by very limited observation.

For cases where there is a difference between voice amplitude, gum lines covering teeth a lot would occur for father out-voicing the mother and receding gum lines for mothers out-voicing he father. The voice, the amplitude of it, is suspected due to the neurons. Different shapes result in various amplitudes. The width and length are suspected to cause the voice uniqueness. Does consciousness play a role in sperm production through affecting mood? When system B is enclosed by system A, the boundary condition of system B will change should system A change. Sperm production is suspected to be affected by such a phenomenon as even the slighted change in conditions will force new states of maximum entropy and minimum enthalpy. If the process is not just right, manufacturing defects may be introduced into the system B whether they be mutations or some kind of critical error. Just right however, allows the male to produce the right sperm to optimize the female's egg via recombination. A precursor to a lot of illnesses is excessive stress. Evidence supporting this idea will be presented later on. Let's get back on tack. If time and demand and supply were place on a graph with quantity on the vertical axis and time on the horizontal axis, it would probably look like two plots with one eclipsing the other. In this case. The predictions, trying to explain the system is still obscure detail wise: biological level especially. It does open up new possibilities, however. What is important is that how voice eclipses at how much information is transferred over a time average predicts something.

Upon further observation of voice of parents to teeth of the child, there was one even more surprising thing. The arrangement of adult teeth is relative to the duration of the baseline voice of the parents or energy output. If there is a greater duration in the father's voice than the mother's, the child will then have teeth with gaps in them. If vice versa, the child will have teeth misaligned. The fundamental argument is a cell is approximated as a net electrical charge with this charge being caused by the mitochondria. Since the mitochondria is inherited maternally, the charge is the same should there be a maximum of quantity of mitochondria and maximum power. If these maternally inherited teeth were to be approximated as a cluster of cells or a net electrical charge arranging them would be a matter of optimal space. One can always go with more space than required to be safe. One would then have gaps. One can always try optimizing; becoming closer and closer to the space one needs to create seamless teeth arrangements for a perfect smile. Of course, there is the matter of gum lines. Essentially, all one has to do to create a child of perfect teeth is to find a partner with the amplitude and duration of voice being the same though will this person be someone they love is a question for the individual. It has something to do with how the voices match whether it truly be bits or the duration of one's baseline is up for debate. That is what the observations suggest. Nothing for sure: huge surprise, however.

From the variety of amplitudes and duration out there, one can imagine how difficult it is to find a person of perfect match. It may be the reason certain areas of the world are prone to monogamy while others are prone to polygamy. If the width and length of the neuron contribute to the amplitude and duration, respectively; two people with the exact same voice are hitting a state where much like hoses of the same width and length, the baseline pump from the power source corresponds to the exact same in the other system. This resonance may trigger the brain into releasing neurotransmitters all at once with the discrete component corresponding to the appropriate signal. Of course, there are other factors such as scent and fitness levels. The assumption is that the power sources helps create thus shape this system which in turn must find another system – passing on the information – to optimize the power source. Perfect optimization results in a perfect smile. Theoretically though there are so many other factors when it comes to selecting a mate. Life, sexual reproduction, should be a three-piece optimization process with mate selection challenges varying with power source availability.

If sexual reproduction is truly a three-piece optimization process between the power source and codes, what examples in the world are there to support this argument? Let us go over the expected population behaviour. If there is a high power source variation – creating a marginally visible difference in terms of teeth shape and code that is as visibly different, the expected production process would be to match the right code to the right power source. If they are unique then forming a pair can be difficult as selecting – especially from a large population – would not be easy unless the system can reproduce asexually. It would be hard picking each system if it were all conducted by a single person. If there is a low variation in power source a low variation in compatible code variation. Forming a pair between the available should not be too difficult as just getting any system out there to match would be easy. The system is easy to optimize and to optimally produce. If the systems could do it themselves, they would literally – like chimps –mate with whatever is in sight. Essentially, if the species has all very similar teeth shape, they would mate with almost anyone in sight. How species reproductive behaviour is observed to vary with teeth shape variation supports this optimization argument.

With these two cases, it can be easy to see why breeding cats is easier than breeding humans. Cats have roughly the same teeth shape. Interchanging a set of teeth to another cat does not pose a big problem. Much like how the exact fundamentally same car model can usually exchange engines. Although the car colours vary or the accessories varies, the engine is the same across all models. Breeding cats would then be similar, though we must take into account of inbreeding. The foundation stays roughly the same, with the power source pushing the organism into shape, into the foundational maximum rates determining the final shape of the animal. The cells making up the cats have interchangeable power source much like a flashlight requiring the same batteries. The color of the flashlight may differ which is how breeders can get cats to have coats and patterns similar to a tiger. Breeding felines is far simpler than breeding humans.

Breeding humans is roughly the same idea. Make sure the power source is compatible before mixing two people together. That is assuming you want the child to have perfectly teeth. At least that is what is expected in theory. The natural process is to marry for what is perceived as love, the rush of activities from the neurons from two system with similar characteristics meeting each other. Though inbreeding must be avoided. Reality does not shine favourably upon inbreeding. Pure bred dogs often have problems, mutts are often much healthier. Just that in humans, teeth shape varies. This fact makes finding the right mate a process requiring patience. Though when the right person does come along, one instantly recognizes it. Having ideal teeth arrangement should be the end result of this optimization process. When there is not enough space in cases where the power source exceeds the boundary – does internal compensation occur? Does it place more force on the boundary than one with ideal space? In humans, that is misaligned teeth. The bright side is that if the code and power source match, the offspring will likely not have the same misaligned teeth as predicted via Mendel's theory of inheritance. Limited observation shows that when baseline voice match, nothing else matters. Perfection is born out of imperfection.

Designing humans is a bit more complicated. In fact, it is a lot more complicated. First of all, you need a solid foundation where the code matches with the power source. Better to have a system with internal force occupying the right amount of space. Preferably not to occupy less space making the shell housing the maximums and minimums not tight. Ensuring a foundation requires the demand component match with the supply component. The rule of thumb is to judge by voice. Once one has the foundation of teeth, one then tacks on the accessories. A foundation is not very useful without accessories to further enhance usability, accessories also need a foundation, not just teeth; to judge demand and supply. The fundamental process fueling the processes. In theory, as long as systems keeps passing on traits to create the right foundation, one could make humans of extraordinary physical and mental capabilities. Multiple dimensions of demand can not all be satisfied though unique sets are created when demands are satisfied to form a permutation. Designing humans is complicated because one is dealing with multiple trade-offs.

All humans must see hope at the core. All humans must see the world with a certain degree of hope even if not an optimist. The Nazis wanted to breed humans. If they did manage to produce human that were significantly better than the average, the world might be under Nazi rule right now. Though they would then have realized life can not flourish without hope. The prediction is that the offspring of the natural process have near perfect teeth. Are these people passionate. Is this the reason one sees many East Asians with misaligned teeth? They see the world as a whole and because of their perspective, they are extrinsically motivated? Or why the passionate Latin Americans seem to have perfect teeth. Love may not be on the top of the list or is it all systems choose to maximize themselves. Are misaligned teeth just the result of humanity's unconditional acceptance? At this point, the topic becomes larger. Though the foundation will always be hope.

##  Natural Design

Designing humans is not all that much of a mystery as how to breed humans have been shown. The best method to breed the necessary people to sustain society is through the shotgun method of scattering the traits to generate as much variation as possible for as much result as possible because human beings have various teeth shapes. To the individual, that may be just one single person. Breeders knows how to breed cats, even if it means inbreeding. Breed like traits together then one attains the traits passed down. The cats with the right traits are kept while the others are discontinued – essentially. Cats all have small, similar teeth at least by observation. Their power source is interchangeable. When the power source goes to the maximum in the system, it will not be incompatible. Breeding cats would then be easy as the task would be similar to having a fleet of cars with same car engines. It would just be a task of exchanging and mixing paints, accessories, and other structures. Through how to theoretically breed cats, one can design humans.

Humans on the contrary have teeth of multiple different shapes and sizes. If one wished to breed humans then certain problems arises. One may not have the right power source readily available as the natural way for humans to select the right power source is through attraction. If humans all had the same, similar teeth shape as chimps then would humans theoretically display a reproductive pattern similar to them? Some people already do that. From this tiny piece of clue can we go on to predict what a child will be like? One really never knows what a child will aspire to be. Can we at least make a physical prediction? The teeth shape variation creates various design challenges.

The assumption is bigger teeth is correlated with bigger neurons which fires faster. A marathon runner would be a person with slow-twitch muscle dominant. The neurological strength of the signal must be strong to give the muscles the necessary force to contract. One may see that marathon runners all have big teeth. The other key factor is that bigger systems are more efficient. Would the power source size of the marathon runner be bigger than say the strongman? If that were true, then teeth size would then be mitochondria dependant.

The strongman would be a person with small teeth. The combination of small neuron systems to fast-twitch fiber would be ideal for bursts. At least on television, when the strongmen are pulling their expressions of agony, they show really small teeth. Usain Bolt is someone with small teeth. He is the fastest man in the world.

Basketball players comes in various different shapes and sizes. They are all to an extent tall – usually. Usually, one would want a person with large teeth to a somewhat muscular physique as too muscular is not endurance suited while too slim has no strength. A compromise between power and endurance. Powerful muscles are thick while the endurance ones are rather slim.

The combination of neuron system size to how fast the actuators can respond determines what the system is best physically responsive and respondent to. Granted the neurons are fully developed. The power productions should not matter that much in the actuators themselves as power can vary to how much the actuators need – mitochondria differ with cell type. All of this speculation about athletic abilities raises questions of how control system to actuator to power source affects what the system can do. The pairing of actuator to control system should determine what the system is optimized to do.

Since the power source is assumed to affect how the control system develops, mapping out the combinations would be prudent. Power source can roughly be categorized as small, medium, and large given the size of human teeth and assuming teeth size and power source size is directly relative to each other. In terms of responsiveness, muscles come in slow but enduring, moderately fast and moderately enduring, and fast and fatiguing fast. In total, there are nine general combinations. In those nine combinations, there can be different body fat distributions and height which affects what sports the person aspires to be professional. Sumo wrestlers are fat while any extra body fat would severely hinder performance of a basketball player. Many power sources to actuator type exist.

One of the main ideas of this book is how to design systems naturally around the power source. Then let us begin with the smaller power source output combinations. First of all, regardless of whether this source power source is paired with slim or coarse muscles, the person should theoretically have small teeth. The first combination is slim muscle to small power source. Artists or people who require great control and technique from the hands such as bus drivers should be this system as they require finer control from finer brain connections for prolonged periods of time. It also does not mean some people cannot drive because they have big teeth. The optimal for the job are what we culturally perceive as the best. The second combination is moderate muscle to small power source. This combination is not all that common over here in the West. The third combination would then be course, thick muscle to small power source. This combination would be the strong man.

The second major category would then be the moderate power source. If this power source were to be paired with slow-twitch muscle. Pairing this moderate power source with moderate muscle would then mean a good balance of responsiveness to endurance. Pairing this moderate power source to thick muscle should result in good responsiveness and less endurance.

The third major category would then be big power source. If this power source were to be paired with slow-twitch muscle, the system would then be able to produce force with great neurological strength; repeating it over and over again for vast durations. This combination would then be the marathon runner. Big power source to moderate muscle would then yield a system of great neurological responsiveness to a balance of endurance and power. This system would correspond to the pioneers who rowed boats in rivers across uncharted territory in Canada and perhaps some professional basketball players. The last combination would then be big power source to fast actuators. This system should have very fast neurological response rate and even faster physical response time. It would be chimpanzees in nature as they have big teeth and are incredibly muscular. Power is how much energy is released over time. TNT have lesser energy than table sugar. TNT releases energy much quicker than sugar which allows it to be used destructively. Chimps are optimized to produce maximum power through the speed of both the control system and actuators. Anyone on the receiving end of such power would endure greatly as many victims of chimpanzee attacks are left severely disfigured. Whether this system does not seem to exist in humans because of social construct is unknown.

The nine categories mentioned above are the nine general categories. Most people do not have purely just one type of actuator. Even salmon have some white muscle to make bursts of movements. Of course, it raises the question how much this optimization affects height or is it height independent? The second note is that just because this is how optimized systems are designed to function. It does not mean if one married someone for big teeth, one will get the next athletic superstar. The resulting child may just have misaligned teeth. Many, many factors contribute to the success of a system whether it is optimized to the power source and also to the environment. This optimization between actuator to control system to power source is not believed to affects intelligence. The size of the neurons may perhaps influence how the thoughts come into consciousness whether they vary in speed and duration with the size of the neurons is unknown though it is theoretically predicted. Through the nine general categories, one can attain a rough idea of an individual's optimal physical output.

Now that we have gone over control systems to actuators, what about what everyone is obsessed about? Teeth. Previously, voice match is observed to be critical to teeth arrangement including the gum lines. That is generally just called love. The suspected phenomenon happening behind the most beautiful thing in the world is one where what occurs in the conscious affect gamete production. How it all affects gamete production requires further research. Whether it affects the shuffling of genes is unknown. The idea is that man get erections from signals coming from the brain. It would then be at least prudent to consider what affects the penis also affect the gonads? Can the same be said of a female? Or is it all just a random mess of genes? All we can do is build on what little observation we have. Teeth should not be the obsession.

One can not really breed humans as humans have vastly different teeth shapes. If one took all the people with the same teeth shape in the world to breed them together, the problem would then arise of people having many different traits. A Nigerian with the same teeth shape as a Northern European will definitely not get the breeder an Aryan. Though mixing the two together will get what is ideal to society, a person optimized to take on the world which can be as simple as choosing happiness and the simple things in life. Breeding humans is not something one should consider doing as humans are unique.

The best way to design humans is to let the systems design themselves. That is assuming all human beings choose love. Is the maximum flow of information between two neural fuzzy logic networks with discrete components at the right combination is what love is? People do feel that way. However, society does not make having children easy as the rising cost of having a child often means a person may choose someone because of their resources whether it be a woman or a man. The hope in this world, is the system provide the bare bones while the people give rise to the necessary vitals. The system is the machinery, where this machinery is going depends on the people who can take it in any direction, they want which does not mean it will always be good as with the case of the Nazis. Western civilization is the birthplace of eugenics, the idea has been implanted without any success as the remarkable can arise from the ordinary. Free will or the illusion of it maximizes the chances of a successful design.

If there was a bipedal walker with arms that can be fitted with various farming equipment, mass producing it would be a lot less hassle than producing farming equipment of all different sorts. This bipedal worker can be armoured and be fitted with weapons in times of war should the need arise. The need would occasionally arise where a few specialized bipedal walkers would be needed to fulfill a specific purpose. They may have greater processing power, size or strength varying, and etc. Humans are not too different from this bipedal walker robot. They can take up arms in times of war and take on other tools in other times. If they all had the same, interchangeable power source, they would all homogenize into roughly one shape as it can be seen with felines with all the same teeth. The best way to let these systems design themselves is to let them do whatever they want. Since human beings have various power source, it does not change the fact that one should also let them do what they want. Just that the end result will be systems of various size and capabilities. Human beings are the biggest bang for the buck.

Now to the question of teeth. How does one get perfect teeth? The observed reality is when two people marry for love, everything works out fine. One may be tempted to just make babies with a person with nice teeth, that may or may not work as one may or may not love this person. What is love? What is attraction? Supposedly, love is the release of a cocktail of chemicals in the brain. What causes the release in the first place? With neural fuzzy logic network with discrete components to model the brain – should the right permutation hit the network – will it squeeze out the right amount of chemicals because of the speed the signal is firing at? This speculation raises a question about schizophrenia as the illness is hypothesized to be caused by excessive chemicals in the brain. The question arises of whether the neurons are firing too fast than originally designed? Squeezing out extra neurochemicals at the other end which all together cascades into the symptoms of schizophrenia. All of this is not relevant to teeth. Just have children with a person you love and hope for the best and that will get you the foundation. The reality is that the male may need to spend some time to brew the right sperm for the egg he wishes to fertilize. The case for females would then be make sure eggs mature properly which is likely a case of consciousness to mood to egg maturation. The time spent especially at the baseline for the both sexes. By that, raising your voice at your spouse or withering would not be good as it is suspected that consciousness may have an effect on sperm production through mood. Roughly, extra stress or not enough stress may not be favourable towards producing the right sperm or maturing the right egg. Teeth is still a mystery.

The question naturally arising from this power source to control system to actuator optimization process would then be what happens when the power source is defunct? When the power source is not working as intended or more specifically – a topic falling outside of engineering – mitochondrial disease. Only observed one case of what was perceived to be mitochondrial illness when searching for maternally inherited adult teeth shape. The person had a mixture of teeth shape between the father and the mother. They were not yanked out to compare the roots as dentistry falls out of engineering. Other than teeth, this person seemed to have other afflictions which are best not mentioned to protect privacy. Defunct power source plays a fundamental problem.

If one could edit the power source to correct it then everything should be fine except when the power source goes to a maximum. In other words, predicting teeth arrangement would be difficult. This optimization process does not lead to how to design the necessary circuitry and programs to simulate the power source to the demand of the code. Although if one goes back to previous chapters, engineers would test cars by crashing them. Analytical methods or even numerical methods may be too time consuming. The direct equivalent to this rule of thumb method would then be to find someone who has the exact same teeth shape as the female afflicted with mitochondrial illness assuming this female's teeth is intact and not corrupted. Transplant the donor mitochondria then everything should be fine though the estimation may be a bit off by a little but that is nothing the dentist can not fix. The other method would be to use the male who wish to have children with the afflicted female. In other words, use the already existing neural circuitry to see who the male is compatible with. Use the mitochondria of who the male is attracted to should be better than visual inspection. Though the problem is that some man will only ever love one woman and not everyone wants to share their eggs. It really happens. The container all needs to adjust accordingly when power source proceeds to their maximums

The continuation of humanity with all its imperfections deemed to be worthy is more important than perfectly arranged teeth. For perfect teeth to arise, it would require the base components which will not always appear perfect. Much like how a stalk of corn may not seem to be the most perfect of specimens, it can still be grounded down to make cornmeal, and eventually cornbread. One does not need perfectly shaped potatoes to make mashed potatoes. The final product is skill-dependant of the baker or the chef, respectively. The sum of the whole is greater than any of the parts. Teeth are one of the many parts constituting a human being.

The more one thinks about teeth, the more troublesome it will become as the process is much similar to compressing a balloon. The best way to shrink a balloon is to throw it into the freezer, not compressing it by hand. The best way should be to not think about it and just follow what is already within. The exact biological details on the cellular levels are still obscure. However, the societies where people can do whatever they want are often the most successful: hope. At times, human beings can only choose hope over despair. Especially in circumstance where we do not know what the probable outcome is. Hope is the most powerful element in human existence as it leads to progress in each and every generation. All that progress is accumulated eventually to pave the way for a better tomorrow each and every day.

##  Canadian Extract

Instead of measuring enough teeth to get a sample size where the standard deviation is within an acceptable margin of error. Let us try building the idea – seeing how well it holds up to reality by assessing the two major worlds. Measuring that many teeth would take forever.

Extraction is the West. When it comes to drugs for certain illnesses, they want to extract the key active ingredient to treat the illness. The drug is then eventually synthesized, mass produced, and sold as a product. Somewhere along the line of known knowledge, it would be unlikely of Westerners to see the plant that treats the illness as all together having something to do with treating the affliction. In the West, the mindset is to create more – not using what they already have in a different way.

Extraction not in the sense of only the best is skimmed at the top. Extraction as in putting everything in their respective categories. Allowing whatever it is, to function at their maximum. Out of the many variables in the world, the Westerner sees what is the most important out of the chaos that is the world. The bottom line to what is necessary for success. People are sorted by their skill and ability. Every cog in the system is valuable as all the cogs are needed down to the last of them. Extraction is essentially taking what is wanted out of the world. Many ways to extract what is desired. A fundamental understanding of the nature of the matter must be attained before what is desired can be extracted. Extraction also in the sense the foam floating to the top is removed.

Extract is a positive notion in the West. When the Aveeno advertisements speaks of oatmeal extract, it is considered a way to advertise, to market the product. Naturally, one can only imagine what their attitudes towards everything is. Two extremes, good and bad. Eliminate what is bad, let the good prosper. The journey may be a long and arduous one, but it is worth it to them even when weeds keep sprouting from the lawn. To them, it will be a never-ending cycle of weeding out what is unnecessary to their survival. Whatever does not benefit is discarded. A little residue is not a humongous deal to the average Westerner.

When it comes to the very best, the West may pale a little compared to the East which may all be due to how their world's foundation. Even the best of the best of their world are only products of a system. The system cannot take care of everything. Whether they are truly the best the human race has to offer is up for debate. Will their best succeed under all circumstances? Are they just the best relative to a standard set by society? Would it be better to allow the natural world dictate who is the best according to the world's demands? That hopefully would not be necessary as the world can be rather unforgiving. We human beings often only get one chance. If a person comes into the world with Down Syndrome, there is no way it can be cured. The two extremes of the Bell curve are, as perplexing as they are, there. There for all of us to fathom to the very depth with absolutely no certainty as to why they are the way they are. The East may have greater extremes because of their culture. The West has more opportunities for their best to shine at the expense of a less harsh environment that cultivates less through adversity.

A process in the West to produce one of the necessities of their world is canola oil. This production process mirrors their hearts and minds as these Westerners embrace this process to produce a sellable commodity. A quick search online will get one videos showing how this oil is extracted from the seed of the Canola plant. Crushed, pressed, purified, and then bottled. Every process produces a by-product. None of it is ever discarded as waste. Everything is seen in relationship to profit. How each variable relates to the market. Simply put, holism from extract.

This extract makes the odd Westerner who has an orientation towards holism have an easier time putting things together. The matters in this world are all defined by the master variable. Putting them together only requires a tiny bit of effort in order to see the larger picture. One would have to understand first which can only be obtained through deliberate sustained practice. A little bit of holism creates a big bang in the Western world. Putting it all together can mean new ideas or products that can generate vast amounts of money. People in the West can only gain holism from a very deep extract, a very deep understanding of their world. Holism would then be rare in the Western world as the foundation of the West is hope. Out of personal happiness, people choose to quit jobs to pursue their passions. Though not a great idea as it may end in bankruptcy. Out of personal happiness, people choose to marry because they love this person. Through hope and dreams, one focuses on what is the most important. That is the very best of their best.

When a detective or something came to my high school to present about the dangers of the internet, he was gleeful when he mentioned he loved catching paedophiles. To him, they must all just be scum of the Earth. He seemed to fail to see them as human beings. That should the same circumstance befall a regular human being, this person will likely falter as the pedophile did. The right combination to a specific permutation. To Westerners, they never seem to see how one thing can relate to all other things. They never seem to acknowledge that the everything in their world is a product of their world. They are a component to the people this society breeds. However, if gamete production is suspected to be affected by mood – leading to the successful optimization between the two, then damaging humans in anyway is fundamentally wrong because playing dice with our collective future is wrong since what is critical to all of our survival is born out of the seemingly ordinary.

These Westerners see themselves as a model to the world despite their inherent struggles within. These people must be crazy to let the world adopt their system even when they have not fixed every problem they have. Western society breeds these people because they choose to live in happiness. It does not matter what abilities are. As long as one chooses hope over despair, one will be fine as hope is the beginning of many good things. These Westerners are right to see themselves as the model because their people can live in happiness.

All things considered, factors such as appearance, available resources, personality, and so on matters when selecting a mate. For some reason, males choose females based on their reproductive value which is all appearance based. The visual stimulus is very powerful to the male. It is a multibillion-dollar industry. Why is this selection of females based on their attractiveness the case? From what we have discussed. Males would seek a female with the right power source. Power source variations determines the base and when what is above the base proceeds to minimum accumulation and maximum rates, it will determine the final shape of the system. At the very maximum, adult teeth shape is expected to be inherited maternally. What the male is looking for is probably the right power source. It does not necessarily mean all males will gravitate towards a single power source type; considered to be the most beautiful by the standards of society. It does mean a male will gravitate towards the compatible hardware. Not all women will look like slender, tall Victoria's Secret models. If the optimization process is really power source to instructions then instruction to instructions, we should see a similarity in couples in populations that have reached a steady-state. The world fizzles out to a point where people simply balance themselves.

Personal happiness is what the human conscious perceives as giving maximum satisfaction. Whether happiness is just a product of survival to ensure hardware is optimized or just a by-product of the large human brain is a question. Although, something can exist or be part of a system without a purpose is rather unlikely. Personal happiness is hope fulfilled.

The assumption previously made was sperm production was influenced by consciousness through mood. How can this assumption be put to the test? If sperm production is really influenced by consciousness, we can asses the idea by the end result of reproduction. Western society generally let put people do what they want within reason. If it be something like murder or selling drugs, something outside the bounds of the pursuit of happiness, then it be unlikely to happen as the people who made the Western world have rules in place enforced by people who share similar beliefs. When people want to do something in this world, they can usually do it. Everywhere on Earth, there are people with severely misaligned teeth. The explanation based on what have been put forth, is one of compatibility. If the voice – the internal state – deviates from each other, then something bad will happen. If the baseline state of the mother is greater than the baseline of the father, then the resulting child will have misaligned teeth. The internal state of the father can be depressed to create a not perfectly compatible sperm. That is only an observation. Misaligned teeth would then be a product of culture as to who marries who and society as to how the individual is treated. Whether it will contribute to him being up or down. How a society creates opportunity for its people to pursue happiness has enormous consequences as mood is believed to have a humongous effect on overall health.

Misaligned teeth are not all that a big deal as it probably is simply how nature compensates for a maximum-mismatch. Power source number varies with each cell with the cells requiring the most energy having the most power source. The parts are generally compatible, interchangeable although teeth alignment is suspected to be an optimization process the brain must adjust for. Misaligned teeth would then be just a slight mismatch of power source with it most likely be due to how the world affects the individual or how the individual reacted to the world. There are more important things in life than how well teeth are aligned.

By the number of dentists all over here in Canada, one can at least say these people at least care very much about their teeth. Their pursuit of dental health is not necessarily for the better of their ego. With what little they know; they try to find a mate who they think will produce the next generation with perfect teeth. If the optimization process is not carried out, it will probably result in a decline of the necessary human resources. This decline of human resources is probably what caused the decline of many civilizations. A drastic decrease in geniuses to tackle the difficult problems will only result in the problem growing out of hand. Through these people's struggle with teeth, they have yet to devise a final solution to the problem of teeth as it requires a huge leap of understanding.

Then of course, there are people who thinks teeth are just teeth. Could not care whether they miss brushing their teeth for a couple of days. Though that would be not advised as not brushing your teeth leads to plague buildup in the arteries. These people are not necessarily people with bad teeth. To these people, they are not obsessed with appearances as they value happiness. They know what happiness truly means. That happiness means personal fulfilment. Teeth are just teeth. What matters the most is hope. This attitude is what allows them to pass on or find a partner with the right teeth to go on to create the next generation. The entire brain is most likely dedicated to this optimization process as it would be unlikely to possess any extra brain power. The brain inevitably seeks the best fit. These people would unlikely be greedy in the sense they want the best out there. These people would inevitable seek what is best for themselves, as it may be seen across their entire lives. A good predictor of teeth arrangement in the next generation would then be the ability for a person to optimize, regulate, adjust, and compensate in the pursuit of happiness while under adversity. Teeth are just teeth for the most part.

In the case of culture, it would be two people overly fixated on appearance thinking that one should have children with this person because this person has nice teeth. If his teeth are much smaller, than it would be unlikely bigger teeth would fit his smile. This does not seem to happen very often in the Western world. Once again, Western civilization is the birthplace of Romeo and Juliet. The clash of West with the rest of the world has enormous consequences.

The case with people is a bit more complicated. Usually, the natural process takes care of things so that one only ends up having children with someone where power source is compatible. The problem usually occurs with the demands of the world as said person may not be able to regulate their inner world when crushed with external forces. The idea is that sperm is affected by consciousness that the internal states affects sperm production. As one can imagine, it raises the question whether thinking about other woman is a good idea. Having children while the internal-state is not at the baseline is not a very good idea as the sperm produced may not be the best compatible sperm. That is what only is suspected, people are truly complicated.

If what has been said is true, then Western civilization should have less severe case of teeth misalignment. People usually have children at least out of their own desire, whether it be an unplanned pregnancy or teenage pregnancy. Personally, many people with the afflictions plaguing the East are not commonly seen. Most likely, the population has reached a steady state where people can effectively judge their potential mate by teeth shape. The other possible scenario is that these people choose happiness over everything else in their struggle for happiness. There are problems to West. They, however, have made their world work.

In the Western world, the best of their people is able to extract the master variable from a sea of chaos. These people often end up making decisions for their people. The people at the top of Western society also make the foundational decision for the Western society – dictating where the society's direction. Various systems are required to sustain that tiny bit at the top as without the necessary foundation, none of it would be possible. Extraction in the sense when all seems lost, one can see the slight flicker of hope.

It hopefully is not the case that this process of maximums and minimums is not enough to heave everyone towards a better future that some people inevitable end up going homeless. Is it a motivational problem or some of these people simply fell through the cracks? Though some of these people just do not want anything to do with the world. For these people, would the solution would then be deliberate sustained practice similar to those found in world-class athletes or world-class anyone? Though that is not necessarily the case as there are smart people who want nothing to do with the world simply because they see the world as awful. If the world can get these people to participate, the problems we have would at least reduce. The problem with people who are super motivated is that they want more, not necessarily better. Here is the flaw with human beings. They want more but not better.

##  Chinese Holism

For Chinese students to enter university, they must pass a final exam. This exam is notoriously difficult with questions that seem absurd and absolutely not sensible compared to the Canadian provincial exams. China needs every drop of human resources it can muster to not only sustain itself as a country, but to move forward into the future. Students study zealously for the exam because the belief is that a better education leads to a better job, thus a better future. Though that is not necessarily true as people who cut hair make millions by creating their own franchise. China has rigorous educational standards.

In the West, a few parts of the machinery are designed to squeeze out the oil from the seed. Usually just a few times is enough as the rest is not worth the money to squeeze out. The education system is to educate then extract from the population what is necessary to sustain their population whether they be engineers, doctors, or scientist. These people all help the people who keeps the world running. They are not necessarily looking for what is the best in the West, they are looking to put people in the right place. If the human is optimized to do this task, it will come easiest to them that they will be able to do with not only minimal effort but better than everyone else. One's gift is what comes the easiest. That is the right idea as the person who can do it with minimal amount of effort often creates something beyond the imaginations. In China, because their main perspective is holism, when they want to extract something, they will use every stage of the system to extract down to the last drop. The contrasting difference between East and West are the stages of their entire system.

Only from holism do the Chinese see extraction. They will design a system where the goods they want will naturally accumulate. The saying in the West is if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say it. In China, the attitude is does it do any good? Not sure if the Chinese is one step above the West though it does lead to different societies. Free speech is not so abundant as unless you have something to say that will help immensely, it would be better just to not voice your opinion. Does it do any good? Does it help at all? By seeing how everything relate to each other, do the Chinese extract the key variables: extract from holism

The school days begins rather early in China. It ends rather late as well. School lunch was provided though, it paled in comparison to the cooking of a professional cook. The teacher would say things such as she would celebrate by setting off a bunch of firecrackers should one of my less academically inclined students leave. Did not really know what to make of it at the time though now her insensitivity is seen as a lack of understanding of systems. Really poor choice of words. Teachers would never say such a thing in the West. Canadian high school teachers are not paid by how many A students they produce. It may be different university wise. Physical education in China was brutal. Grade one students had to learn to do a front roll. Guess someone out of the students was an aspiring stunts man. Why on Earth would anyone have someone in grade one learns such a thing? The popular Chinese saying is that little kids have no backs, a little physical labor will not hurt. The other saying is that one is more flexible when one is little. Early school days were just a hint of trials to come.

Over in the West, they let the children play, enjoy life. When in life again would they have another chance to do so? Who knows what illness, misfortune or disability may struck in the most unfortunate of time? Life only gets harder as time goes on. Over in China, children are expected to get perfect test scores, and master some musical instrument as if they are some musical prodigy. Life only gets easier for them later on as school is rather difficult. The ways of the West are much gentler on the human being.

Culturally, what matters to the Chinese is family, love, and so on. Though there are stories that if a guy gets with a girl and he does not spend money, the girl will leave him. The very fact that this piece of news makes it over to my parents who are in Canada suggests how wide spread this phenomenon is. Even my landlord who is Chinese has told me you need to go out and eat after seeing a movie with your significant other. Otherwise, who on Earth wants to spend time with you. Then there are my coworkers who say that if you like each other, then that is all that is needed to make it work. One can forge a future with that one person they love. Chinese people do not divorce at the same rate as people in the West because they can see family, love, and all that is whole through holism.

The Chinese honestly does not seem to be all that different from Westerners. The Chinses are trying to Westernize, they import KFC and all these fast foods in order to make their society more Western. Though, not entirely certain if the regular Chinese person would understand that the West achieves holism through extract and not extract from holism. The furthest the Westerner get is losing face. Chinese people are all inevitably human beings with the needs of hope: a better future to strive towards. Though if the Chinese westernized at the core, it would make a huge impact on the world. If they kept their traditions in tandem with Western values of hope and reason, China would then be in a league of its own. All sorts of people in the world, what makes the Chinese so different from the people in the West? They are all just people.

The Chinese are merely just people who want the best for themselves and their children. It would be wrong to demonize them simply because they have a one-party government. Are they not human beings? Though, their method to achieve what is the best for themselves and their children may be plagued by a reasoning fallacy. Delayed gratification today leads to a better tomorrow. One can probably see how working hard without working effectively can affect a society when everyone does the same thing. Their attitude may arise from the optimization of the power source they have available to sustain the human being. They probably have a very large variation of teeth shapes causing the people there to adopt a different attitude that differs from the Western vision of love. The variation may be so high that finding a partner may be impossible. Naturally, the next best thing would be to marry based on availability. This act is simply what people do under dire circumstances; they can only do what is the next best thing for themselves and their children.

In Shanghai, salary is super important. Having a house is important. Having a car is important. Looks do not matter as much. Though a Polish-Canadian told me women care about attractiveness and that if one had a penthouse, one could sleep with a woman a night. Yes, money is important because ability allows one to make money. Ability allows one to rear kids successfully. Women are known to value content more than packaging; one would imagine this way is the way because consciousness is suspected to affect sperm production through mood. One has seen a not so attractive father with a great looking wife and their children are fine. Looks should not be all that critical to a woman, theoretically. Plenty of women get hitched on a regular guy, at least over here in the West. Theoretically, her teeth will fit his smile thus leading to successful, optimized foundation. Perhaps the Chinese people can not make sense of their instincts through many years of delayed gratification. They would then turn to things such as material wealth like salary or what kind of house one owns.

When the population approaches a steady-state, there should be plenty of optimized people to spread around. They may not necessarily be all great looking though they can fulfill whatever their task is without too much problems. A population that way has potential to go further with each and every generation. Teeth arrangement should not be all that a big of deal in the first place as it leads to misalignment when people choose vanity over love. Every time some sizeably new set of power sources is added to the population or a demand for a different power source arise, the system adjusts to the disturbance to reach steady-state again.

Given the culture of China, here is what to expect. Seeing people with slightly misaligned, not so perfect teeth arrangement is a bit common at least that was true at the time of observation. Odd gum line ratios would then be also a bit more common. In the West, people with perfect teeth are more commonly seen. People either come in perfect smiles or far from. Teeth should not be all that terribly arranged in China as people do marry for love. Though because they are a developing country, people may be with someone they do not necessarily have passion for which is not at all that uncommon in the West. Anything can happen in the West. Expect and predict from a people's behaviour, not what is seen in plain sight.

This teeth alignment not aesthetically pleasing is possibly because Chinese people are not prone happiness the way Westerners are. The Chinese are not prone to extract: what is the most important. Their attitude makes everything a tad more difficult for everyone, especially if one is trying to remain at the baseline to brew some sperm. Words whether internal or external cascades into the thoughts and feelings that make our inner world. The way Chinese people scorn at others and especially their children sets themselves up for failure. One should see how they scorn at their employees at Foxconn, at least that is what the documentary showed. The Chinese have to resort to drastic means to not let the maximums manifest into their world that will negatively impact their society because not everyone understands that they should only do things if good comes from it. For example, the Chinese pianist Lang Lang is mocked in China as looking like some kind of peasant. From their teeth arrangement of misalignment, one can tell of their general attitude. One of extrinsic motivation, not driven to pursue personal happiness.

People may not necessarily marry for love in China as it may be a luxury they can not afford especially with the ticking biological clock of a woman. Knowing that adult teeth is inherited maternally under normal circumstances should make selecting a mate easier and possibly lead to more successful outcomes. Though would it really reduce afflictions? It would not be right to say the Chinese have more problems because of their attitude as nature designed parts to be interchangeable with no problems whatsoever. To nature, as long as it works, it is fine. To the human being, is has to be visually, aesthetically pleasing. The natural design is the way, if something works in this mystery of a world then why complain about it? One can be happy, one can enjoy life, one can love and hope, and most importantly, be loved. Being rich and hated is a terrible fate. People are obviously only nice to you for your money. Many people in the world become rich to only be despised. These people end up marrying not for love.

Knowing adult teeth shape is inherited maternally may not necessarily be enough as the natural optimization process is already predetermined through hope. The Chinese will have to adopt not necessarily a Western type of love, though they will have to make adjustments at the core for hope to see the effects on their world. The Chinese have many rooted beliefs that are not conducive to having a good life. Somethings are honestly cloak and daggers. They will need to ask themselves what is that they really want. If they really want their kids to be the next Einstein, the odds would be better if they created life with a person they felt passion for. Though adversity breeds competence; everything needs to be just right. Though this person must have the deliberate and sustained practice to become world class, he will at least have the foundational advantage to go further than others. Only through self-interest can this motivation last a life time. Knowing how the future could possibly be is better than not knowing at all. We can start with teeth as a variable though the master variable can only be hope.

The problem with knowing adult teeth shape is inherited maternally is what happens when people become absolutely obsessed with teeth shape? Women are already scrutinized for their appearance in the West, what happens when – instead of letting the so-called imperfections of humanity continue; flaws be deemed worthy – we as society become obsessed with teeth shape? What happens when the world envisioned is not seen as a whole but only pieces are picked out from the fray? The way Western society is, is worrisome. Bitcoin was invented as a way of private transaction; people display interest in such matters because it can make them money. People will undoubtedly become obsessed with teeth shape because some will fail to see the entire picture.

An obsession with teeth shape should not be the case in the Western world as the Western world is the birthplace of Romeo and Juliet. What essentially happens in Romeo and Juliet is that two people of opposing houses fall in love and they commit suicide in the end because they can not go on to live their lives with each other. Sorry to ruin it if you have not read it. Essentially, Juliet's teeth fit Romeo's smile and should Romeo sow his seed in Juliet we shall all benefit just like how the Ancient Greeks possibly thought of their Olympics. What should happen is that nothing will happen in the West. People will continue to live their lives as the added benefit of a tad bit of certainty certainly will not hurt. Life will likely become a tad less interesting; not knowing can be a pleasure. It will not change the grief parents will have to deal with when tragedy strikes their kids. The canon of the West suggests all of this will just be an upgrade to this world.

Things should change in the East as people realize how important personal happiness such as hope is important to the prosperity and continuation of their people. Having an idea of how this reproduction process comes together and that it is an optimization process will make them see why the Western world is so successful. People in the East will understand why Westerners choose to follow their heart and why they produce such remarkable people.

Though the Chinese must be careful to not adopt every aspect of Western civilization as it would be folly to import everything Western. If Incel shootings started happening in China, that would be a great tragedy. If people divorced at the same rate as people do in the West, that would be a great tragedy. If the birthrate fell, that would be a great tragedy. These Westerners lack the holism to see how the everything in their world is a product of their core beliefs and values that have manifested into a system with slight shortcomings. The Western world is fantastic by all means. Everyone has equal, fair access to food at the supermarket though the endless drive to improve everything is taxing. Improving the process is believed to improve society. The problem being, should one person triumphs, it may not necessarily benefit the entire pack as factors such as the cost to raising a child will increase – deterring people from having children. The Chinese must then apply extract like people in the West does to filter out what may be good for the West but poison to the East.

For one person to survive, the whole community should endure and prosper with him. The whole world should endure and prosper with him. Is this world what human beings are really all is capable of? Are we bounded by our limits? We can only fend for ourselves in this world. What little we can do to help others. If one has the ability in the West, one reach for it with both hands. Help may not necessarily be financial as the ability to generate money is more important than having money itself. If someone gives another person a different perspective that will allow the release of what is stored, it will result in money. Being human is hard no matter the levels of intelligence.

The East has many things the West can learn from. Just adopt a tad bit of holism and everything will become clear. Everything will reveal itself as the world exists in extract. Putting them together would then be easy.

##  Extremism

Does faith alone guarantee entrance into the divine that life lived with faith is a blessed journey only one divine being knows the true ending? Do the deeds done in life allows safe passage into heaven rather than what one believed or thought during his life time? A doctorate Ghanaian student said that at the gates of heaven, the billionaire who helped those in need will enter heaven and the preachers who spent the money the people donated would be denied. Regardless of what one believes in, the realization eventually comes that life is finite. For the next generation to have a future, one must do what one can do to ensure a future. People need a reason to do. In this world where many hopes are easily crushed, having a divine being by your side spiritually surely helps.

In Canada, what one believes in private does not matter. Religion is not a topic ever brought up as it creates differences. Canadians want to be united. Canadians face the troubles of their world together as one. Though they do struggle with terrorism and the extreme ends of what their world or what the world produces. Equal opportunity ensures all life has the chance to flourish, not will flourish What happens when a person of exceptional ability chooses to cause pain and suffering to those in the world? The tiniest of fundamental differences can make even the wisest of us look at a people differently. These fundamental differences go on to create entirely different worlds. As long as the foundation is hope as it is in Canada, then there should be no problems. Everyone minds their own business in Canada.

Being a scientist and a person who manages a hatchery, my dad has met many people of different nationalities through out his life. Perspective buyers for his geoduck seeds come from Japan, Poland, Uzbekistan, and many other countries. What makes the stuff my dad makes so great? Do not know. He, at least, makes it look incredibly easy and not only that he gets the biggest bang out of the buck: cheapest, most economical, and the fastest. How he developed those skills in the first place all came from the fact that his foundation is based on hope. In his journey, the people he has met are usually highly educated. He said to me that at those educational levels, racism should not be the mindset as these people have the ability to think things through. It is not then by racism that we should be concerned with the people who are racist but rather they themselves lack the ability to ever see things in a different light that will enlighten themselves. Although this one guy my dad met did a super poor job, he is a doctorate by all means. With that education, he has the ability, the potential to learn. His wife, however, absolutely hates the Western world to the point where she does not even go out of the house. Fairly certain she is an Islamic fundamentalist. The situation has improved thankfully as she now occasionally works at a grocery store. The many people my dad has met shapes how he sees the world.

The hearts of men dictate the direction of this world. One time, my dad spoke of a first nations conservation officer who at one time was fined for smuggling a lot, a lot of abalone. In a twist of irony, he became a person who enforces the rules upon those who poach. Somehow, the guy found redemption in this world. If this world offers even the people who has done even the most extremes of wrongs to redeem themselves, what about the terrorists who make all of us uneasy. They could appear anywhere. The odd mistake does happen. When it does happen, one of the many of the world will be affected and with it comes immense suffering. The hearts of men must change for a world to change.

Terrorism is just a few idiots who are making the religion of Islam look bad. At least that is what a Muslim told me. It would be wrong to say a person is bad simply because he adheres to the Islamic faith. It would be wrong to judge a people by a few individuals. Islam is a religion with many adherents, it would be wrong to say they are bad just because of terrorists and say that they will neve achieve prosperity because the ways of these terrorists are rooted in medievalism. Qatar is an extremely rich country. United Arab Emirates is ultra modern. Extremism is a small portion of this world though it is inevitably part of this world.

A person from Iran was redoing his engineering degree for better opportunities in Canada. He said that firing an RPG-7 lead to temporary deafness. He said that he saw first hand of the horrors of the Iran-Iraq war. The exit wounds from the 5.56 is about the size of a large cantaloupe – much bigger than the AK-47. Injured people from the war would not only be severely injured but have their heads looped off with those wires. How a person musters or even have the strength to do such a thing is a mystery. Iran does produce many Olympic weightlifters, nevertheless. The other thing is, many people in Iran are not religious. He never fasted during Ramadan. He said that as along as one keeps their irreligiosity to themselves, everything is okay. From the eyes of this Iranian, there is no David in the middle-east but only goliath. Israel is a humongous power with a nuclear arsenal. Many things disappeared over night during the collapse of the Soviet Union. What this Iranian says is that Iran already has the nuke because of that. Israel may be a small country but it is an incredibly modern nation, one can see how the Iranian would describe Israel as a giant rather than David. Japan is an island nation no where near the largest countries on the planet and Toyotas are seen everywhere. Amazing how people are divided over mere thoughts going on inside their heads.

Muslims are still human beings and one have only heard stories of people adhering to the Islamic faith drinking alcohol. They want their children to be successful – no doubt. Unlike in the West where parents just want their kids to be happy and somehow these people miraculously produce the most envied of human beings in existence. These people who put salt on their boiled potatoes are the most unassuming and most unpretentious people on Earth. Then there is what is on the news regarding how all the terrorist attacks and suicided bombers have their stems in the Middle-East. Out of the many Muslims in the world, only a very small number of them are terrorists. However, this suicide bomber is one of the signature products of their world. From their signature product, will attempt to use extract and holism combined together to get an idea of what their world should be like. There was a time in Iran before the revolution where people could drink alcohol and perhaps, we will see why that was.

Let us begin with how the Western world struggles with the suicide bomber. Terrorist attacks, 9-11 especially, left Americans in absolute shambles as though they may be able to rebuild what has been lost, they struggle to come to terms with the fact that a person, a group of people choose to cause them pain and suffering. Any human being would be devasted by the fact that someone wants to harm them. They will eventually let go of all hostility towards the perpetrators because no one would want to be owned by the acts someone else did towards them. Though unfortunately, they can not live in happiness with the terrorists as these terrorists threaten their way of life. Everyone has to live their lives eventually. As no root cause can be identified, the West resorts to heightening security. Nobody knows what exactly to look for as the skill to judge on the spot is not a common skill. Split second decisions that may save a life usually does not happen or terrorists would not succeed. Not many people have such a skill and those who think what they can do is something special are often overestimating themselves. The people who are perceived by others as having unique abilities often never feel special themselves. This heightening tax the mind and spirit of the people, though people in the West often have great strength and endurance. Through their values, they struggle against terrorism with principles.

The struggle against terrorism is different in the East. The Chinese believes things should be done for the benefit of all. A small sacrifice here and there does not mean much. Personal happiness is often forfeited for a gain in the future or the greater good. Stories of soldier sacrificing themselves to blow up a bridge is not unheard of. The Muslims in China must submit first to the Communist party, a portrait of the president is usually hung on the walls. People are often sent to re-education camps to alter their religious beliefs. To the Chinese, unity is achieved through force where in the West unity is achieved by allowing things to go to their maximums and allowing the not so pleasant things settle to their minimums. One cannot get rid of all them completely. The unity in the West is not absolute unity but the unity is good enough. The nasty, underbelly of the Western world is not completed eliminated though they are at a minimum. Completely eliminating the tiny pockets of vice that will dissipate into the forces to create the structure allowing crime is probably impossible. Though the reduction can reduce down to the point where the system can not withstand the disorder of this world. The attitude of the Chinese is two can play the same game of being unreasonable.

It must take skill to recognize a lone attack in the West will people great anguish. One must at least be an adult and have gone through the many things in life that brings so called life experience. It must take even greater skill to study and observe the Western world to strike where it will cause the greatest suffering, the greatest anguish with absolute surgical precision. It must at least take a sharp eye and the ability to be perceptive to even have a clue as to where to strike. Whether a terrorist does such a thing because he was instructed or he devised it all by himself is to be debated. People rarely do anything world-shaking by themselves.

To any human being, what matters is safety, belonging, and mattering. Islamic fundamentalism fulfills all three for those heavily disillusioned with the world. The models, the incredibly talented actors, and the many remarkable people of the West are undoubtably the envy of the world whether one wants to admit or not. The women who join terrorist groups – one can imagine – want to matter to the world. They want to belong to a place where they matter. With that belonging comes a sense of safety. These fundamentalist women probably do not get the essence of Western society where everyone is free to pursue happiness because the foundation of the Western world is hope. What really matters is that you can enjoy things, to live life with those who love, and who love you back. It sounds like their attitude is one where I will only ever truly be happy only should I be a certain way or I have amassed a great deal of whatever it is these people think will make them happy. These people do not seem to understand ability is what allows wealth to come into one's world. Hoarding wealth is a horrible option as one will always have to worry about keeping the money. Ability provides the necessary rates that can accumulate to be released deliberately; allowing one to be a meaningful member of the world.

The suicide bomber is the marriage of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation gone wrong. By all means, the suicide bomber is giving the world a hard time that the world absolutely struggles against it. When the suicide bomber dies by blowing himself up, he believes he will go to heaven. That is the intrinsic motivation. That is the reward. When the shockwave of the blast reaches the world, it will immediately cause pain and at times, enough immediate pain to cause death. Then the shockwave will be felt by those connected to those who have died. This suffering caused enhances their agenda created by their hate preachers. That is the extrinsic motivation. Of course, there are things in the West such as paedophilia and Catholic priests. The Western system, however, does not encourage such a thing and when such a thing is done, it is done only by the will of the priest not through a rigorous chain of command or hierarchy. The act is done by the priest's own volition. The problem with the church is not whether god exists or not. Instead, the problem lies with the fact that god is an infinite concept. For a mortal, finite mind to grasp such infinity, he would need to exert himself to the maximum – revealing who he is as a person fundamentally. He is then naked – making it very easy for a predator to evaluate who is the easy prey. Blind faith is the problem with the church. The source creating the motivation matters immensely as they dictate the end result.

Often, one hears about has the Saudi monarchy has more than one wife. If the king is attracted to all of them that suggests all the teeth sets of these women must fit the king's smile. The neural fuzzy logic network with discrete components is not a reliable rule of thumb to assess power source optimization. Personality is often a better way. There are documentaries regarding the Saudi kingdom. They seem like regular people. The royalty being interviewed has no problems with woman driving that they are going through a renaissance, their own renaissance. Algebra did come from the Islamic world. Saudi women must come in similar teeth sizes to practice polygamy. That Mormon polygamist in British Columbia would likely have wives of similar teeth shape if he truly felt love for any of them. The all seem to have the same baseline vibe... though I rather not delve into modelling terms such as fierce.

The suicide bomber is the worst of the Islamic world. Countries such as Qatar and the United Arab Emirates are definitely the better example of what their world has to offer. The marriage of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation must mean they choose all their actions carefully. Their lifestyle, at the best, must be idyllic. Local Emirates are guaranteed this and that. Some are simply not motivated to strive for their best because there is no pressure from the world, to struggle for existence. Though there are very driven Emirates.

Assuming the United Arab Emirates and Qatar are the best examples of what these people have to offer that their lives are lived in happiness. They must make very wise decisions factoring both themselves and others into the equation. Qatar is a wealthy country that owns bits and pieces here and there. Liquid natural gas transportation technology was developed to bring prosperity to the country. With the revenue generated, their portfolio was diversified to generate more money without much work. The people who ran the country thought of themselves and the generations to come. They must enjoy the time they have now and to make sure the next generation has a better future. Unlike the case of people taking over farm lands to only eat all their peppers without saving the seeds for the next season, the balance of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation is rather effective when it comes to securing happiness now and onwards into the future.

Motivation wise, extremists are motivationally ahead though backwards. They are effectiveness-wise, far ahead of the rest of the world. The West being intrinsic. The East being extrinsic. While the Arabs are a whole to the two sides of the same coin. The so-called best of these Arabs has struck a balance between the heart and mind. Living their lives contently which is better than any prize or medal the world has to offer. One living in peace with themselves is far better than having money with no use. Their so-called worst would then naturally give the rest of the world an extremely difficult time. Both the West and the East struggle against extremism and fundamentalism. One would be amazed at how deliberate and sustained practice leads to world class athletes. All it takes is a will and a reason to sustain the act over and over again until the world trembles under one's feet. Again, the seed spawning the act is just as important as the fruit the plant will bear.

The extremists are motivationally wise ahead of everyone else. It must not be because of the Islamic faith because different interpretations of Islam are everywhere. These people have both heart and mind. Do these people marry for love like people in the West do? Did their power source variation affect how people choose to reproduce optimally to sustain the population?

Yes, extremists are motivationally ahead of everyone else. They are attracted to such because the integration of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation is suspected to offer a splendid opportunity and environment to brew their optimal sperms or hatch their optimal eggs: biological systems within a biological system going to maximum entropy and minimum enthalpy. The world should look to the extremists for how they motivate themselves. Yes, that seems like a shock as the Middle-East is a breeding ground for terrorisms. How effective these terrorists are when they fight only with a gun and without body armor takes incredible faith. Also knowing they are out-gunned. The problems with looking at extremists for inspirations is a lot of people would not adopt their ideologies as people instinctively know they are wrong. The rest of the world needs a reason to pursue happiness in the face of adversity. Should one not just be miserable and work their life away because money is absolutely crucial to survival? Should one just choose what is perceived to be as the best because one does not what will happen after? Motivation wise the extremist are ahead but that will soon all change. With that change, a solution to the struggle against extremism will arise.

##  One World

A life lived without hope will never allow love to become a reality. Life will prosper to the fullest potential as long as there is hope. This hope algorithm is believed through observation to not only produce the people with optimal teeth arrangement but the many remarkable people of this world as well. Without hope, there cannot be a future for people who are living and breathing today and for the generations to come.

The arguments made are up to the individual to determine if they are right or wrong. The observations led to the arguments, with the initial observation made being born out of an argument made. The only task can be done given the lack of resources was to build on the ideas that lead to the observations to see how well it all holds up to reality. The theory better describes reality than anything I have ever known. I, as an individual, have found a satisfying theory describing human reality. To me as the individual, it is the closest to right.

Unfortunately, by letting people determine for themselves, I am essentially separating the chaff from the wheat. I am also sending these people to the moon using today's limited technology. Only those who have developed the right combination of skill sets will truly see things as they really are. My intentions were to always make sure everyone makes it into the new world. However, just like money, some people will struggle while others will prosper. More people will likely struggle than triumph. If someone out there chooses to breed humans and I am very sure someone will, then I will have to live with that on my conscience. This person will most likely get it wrong as the very desire to breed humans shows this person does not understand the beauty of life: human connection. To make things worse, the result will likely be atrocious. I will have to live with that to. Humans need many platforms to flourish. This whole journey has been coping with one thing after the other: a story with no end. The world must inevitably move forward, however. The extremes of this world will get cleaved off while the foundation will head towards a new direction – sprouting new flowers.

The world is currently divided between the East and the West. The major Eastern power is China while America and her allies constitute the West. The cultures of these people are fundamentally different. With the East being holistic while the West extract. Nobody, can change the two cultures by forcing one on the other. Both cultures can converge to the same point, however. At least that is what I believe. Should the cultures change at the core; each civilization will change with the core change. The common root to all mankind is hope and reason. For humanity to move forward, to reach the maximum, hope and reason is essential. The division between East and West will meld together into one.

The goal after a few years of discovering adult teeth shape is inherited maternally was to influence the lives of people. In my mind, I was going to change the world by forcing everyone to adopt a system. That imperfection was bad and perfection was good. What is imperfection and perfection? Are they not judged relative to standards? After I came to my senses to what I have discovered, I came to the conclusion that I was the villain in the whole scheme of things. Life should continue onwards the way it is. Not forced under some system, not what one believes what is right but what is right for these people. What is right for a group of people is only known once one is part of that group of people. The cultures of these people are the totality of their existence, how they minimized and maximized their reality. People should find their own answers to their own problems. Even if I did influence the lives of people, it will not guarantee a prosperous future.

How to roughly breed human beings and how to roughly design human beings are discussed near the end of the book. These two are what the ideas presented should produce. They make sense to me. Though I am not sure how well they should be received. If the goal of a society was to make sure everyone had straight teeth, does the society set up methods to regulate who procreates with whom? In a society of private ownership, entrepreneurs would devise a company that tests the prerequisites. In reality, nature has already beaten all of us to it. The natural way is to just to find someone you have strong feelings for, someone you love. If a society truly wanted everyone to have perfectly arranged teeth then all that society needs to do is to base that world on hope and reason. The problem with that outlook is that some people may not end up getting to have children despite having the desire. Things may or may not work out. Breeding humans is not the best idea, the natural process is better because the natural process produces better human beings, unless one wants a human to just look a specific way. Designing or even augmenting humans is a question up for debate. Will humanity need more geniuses than currently produced to solve our most difficult problems or super-human soldiers to fight wars? People should be allowed to do what they want.

The continuation of human race with all the imperfections – hope and reason – the core of Western civilization. Not the models or the photogenic actors. The extraordinary arises from the ordinary – perfection is born out of imperfection. The extraordinary is better than perfection. How do you, the individual, want your society to continue? Human existence is suffering. In suffering there is hope and in hope, there is redemption. Where there is a remarkable person, there is hope and reason.

The person who invented money must knew the benefits, convenience, and the misery this tool will bring. Out of all the people who have existed, I see myself as having the most in common with the person who invented money – realizing the shortcomings of humanity as people of various different skill sets come together to form a system. As you can probably tell, I do not believe in the best and brightest; a very outdated notion. I believe the optimal person or the right person for the right job. Just because this person succeeded under these circumstances – it does not mean this person will succeed when the world ends? I cannot give people ability, only the tools to succeed. This idea will make life easier though I know some will struggle.

With these ideas, it will be enough to push the world forward towards a better future. It would only be right to let the world know so people can build upon what I have observed and prove me wrong and with what they prove wrong, they can prove wrong the erroneous ways of the world. Though it would be unlikely the world is absolutely wrong – the Western world, especially. My judgements are thus not absolutely wrong. The world will finally make the leap towards a better world.

This way, there will at least be a future for the generations to come. How will that future be will be up to the people of this world. In the end, a better would not be possible without you, the reader. To anyone who chooses hope over despair, I wish you the best. Not everything clear now was always that way. My chapter of my life is over but it lives on in you. May you prevail through hope and reason.

68

