WHEN IT COMES TO CLIMATE
CHANGE WE TEND TO FOCUS MOST OF
OUR ATTENTION ON THE ATMOSPHERE
AND WAS GOING ON IN IT.
BEING
ABLE TO VOTE AND REGISTER TO
VOTE AND REGISTER ON THE SAME
DAY, VOTER SUPPRESSION AND
MULTIPLE DIFFERENT FORMS, THE
OCEAN AND HOW THE OCEAN IS BEEN
CHANGING OVER TIME.
PARTICULAR
HOW IT HAS HELPED TO SLOW SOME
OF THE EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE
UP TO THIS POINT BUT PERHAPS NOT
FOR MUCH LONGER.
TURNS OUT THAT
SINCE 1970 GLOBAL WATERS HAVE
BEEN A POWERFUL ALLY AGAINST
GLOBAL WARMING OBSERVING 93% OF
THE HUMAN CARBON DIOXIDE
RELEASED BY HUMAN ACTIVITIES.
THIS IS ACCORDING TO A REPORT
RELEASED BY THE NATIONAL UNION
OF CONSERVATION OF NEIGHBOR
NATURE.
THEY SAY IF THE OCEANS
WEREN'T THERE TO PROTECT US AND
HADN'T ABSORBED A HUGE AMOUNT OF
CARBON ARE LOWER APIS ATMOSPHERE
WOULD'VE ARTIE HEATED UP BY 36∞C
WHICH DOES NOT MEAN THERE ARE
TEMPERATURES ON THE SURFACE
WOULD BE 36∞C HIGHER BUT IT
WOULD'VE BEEN AN INCREDIBLE
AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL WARMING IN
THE ATMOSPHERE THAT WAS
THANKFULLY A BERNADOTTE THE
OCEAN WHICH HAS BEEN WARMING
WILL CONTINUE TO WARM BY BETWEEN
1 TO 4∞C BY 2100 WHICH IS NOT A
LONG WAY OFF AND THAT IS AN
ABSOLUTELY MASSIVE AMOUNT OF
ADDITIONAL WARMING WHICH WILL
HAVE A NUMEROUS EFFECTS ON THE
ANIMALS THAT LIVE THERE AND
THE REST OF THE WORLD THAT WE
ARE GOING TO GO THROUGH
SOME OF THE EFFECTS IN JUST A
2ND.
I WAS THINK THAT IT'S FUNNY,
IT WOULD'VE WARNED OF NOT FOR
THE OCEAN, I GOT IT, BUT WE
WOULD ALL BE INCINERATED IF NOT
FOR THE OZONE LAYER.
THE OCEANS
HAVE ALWAYS BEEN THERE.
YEAH BUT WE DIDN'T KNOW HOW
STRONG OF AN EFFECT THEY
WERE HAVING AND ABSORBING CARBON
AND THAT WILL NOT PERHAPS
CONTINUE BECAUSE IN THE REPORT
THEY TALK ABOUT THE FACT
THAT THERE IS A MAXIMUM AMOUNT
OF CARBON THAT IT CAN
OBSERVE AND IT IS REACHING IT.
I JUST THINK THE PHRASING IS
ODD.
IF NOT FOR THE MOON,
WITH THE SUN DISTINGUISHES WE
ARE GOING TO FREEZE VERY
QUICKLY.
SHOW ME A REPORT ABOUT THAT.
IT'S JUST ANOTHER STEP THAT
WE HAVE MAXED OUT THE PROTECTION
THE OCEANS CAN GIVE US AGAINST
GLOBAL WARMING.
THE INDICATION
FOR ME WOULD BE THAT THE NEXT
HUNDRED YEARS WERE OBVIOUSLY BE
MUCH WORSE THAN THE LAST HUNDRED
YEARS THAT THE LAST.
WE EITHER NEED TO CHANGE
HOW WE CONSUME AND PRODUCE
ENERGY, CLEAN ATMOSPHERE, OR
GENERATE ANOTHER OCEAN.
ONLY 70% OF THE PLANET, LET'S
FIND SOME MORE WATER.
IT IS TOO BAD THAT WE DIDN'T
GET LUCKY.
SPEAK FOR YOURSELF.
THAT CLIMATE CHANGE DIDN'T
MAKE THINGS BETTER.
IN SOME WAYS IT HAS DONE IN
LIMITED CIRCUMSTANCES MAY BE.
BUT IT WASN'T ONLY GOT THIS
IS GREAT THE RESULT OF CLIMATE
CHANGE IS THAT FOOD GROWS CLICK
QUICKER AND HEALTHIER AND
BETTER.
BUT IT DIDN'T.
THAT IS TOO BAD.
IS JUST MORE EVIDENCE.
A
STORY LIKE THIS COMES OUT AFTER
LABOR DAY SO WE HAVE A
SIGNIFICANT CLIMATE CHANGE STORY
WHICH MIGHT RESONATE WITH PEOPLE
AND THEREFORE INCREASES THE
POSSIBILITY THAT PEOPLE ARE AT
LEAST GOING TO TALK ABOUT IN THE
COMING DAYS ALTHOUGH OUR TALK TO
ACTION RACE SHE'LL ON CLIMATE
CHANGE IS NOT GREAT IN THIS
COUNTRY OR THE WORLD.
ARE IMPORTANCE TO TALK
RADIO IS IN GOOD ART TALK TO
ACTION RATIOS EVEN WORSE.
HOPEFULLY HILLARY CLINTON IS
ELECTED SHE WILL STEP TO THE
PLATE IN A MEANINGFUL WAY ON
CLIMATE CHANGE.
OF COURSE WE
ALL KNOW WE CAN'T DO
IT ON OUR OWN.
WE ARE ONE MIGHTY COUNTRY BUT WE
ARE ONLY ONE.
ONE OF THE THINGS THAT OBAMA
HAS DONE WHICH HAS FALLEN SHORT
IN A LOT OF WAYS BUT IT'S STILL
IMPORTANT THAT HE IS GOTTEN US
INVOLVED IN SOME INTERNATIONAL
AGREEMENTS THAT ARE THE ONLY
CHANCE WE HAVE ACTUALLY STOP
THIS.
AGREEMENTS WHICH DONALD
TRUMP SAYS WE BELIEVE ON DAY
ONE.
IN THE FIRST 35 MINUTES WE
HAVE HAD ON TWO CRITICAL ISSUES.
VOTER RIGHTS FOR MINORITIES AND
CLIMATE CHANGE.
2 REASONS WHY A VOTE FOR JILL
STEIN IS A TERRIBLE MISTAKE.
MILLION SOME HIGHER PRINCIPLE
AND NOBLE ONE, BUT A VOTE
FOR HER IS A TERRIBLE MISTAKE.
AT THE VERY LEAST, IN STATES
WITHOUT BOAT COULD BE THE
DIFFERENCE.
THERE ARE PLENTY OF
PLACES WHERE IT COULD NOT BE A
DISH DIFFERENCE.
IS NOT JUST A VOTE BUT IT'S
ADVOCATING.
YOU MUST GOING
NEGATIVE AND ADVOCATING AGAINST
TRUMP.
FIND GO THAT WAY AS
OPPOSED TO ADVOCATING FOR
HILLARY BUT ESPECIALLY PEOPLE
WITH A PLATFORM.
EVERYBODY'S
GOT A PLATFORM BECAUSE EVERYBODY
HAS A NAME AND NO ONE IS AS
INFLUENTIAL AS YOUR FRIENDS.
FOR AS MUCH AS YOU WANT TO
LISTEN TO BILL O'REILLY 
AND I
HATE USING THEM BUT NOBODY AS
INFLUENTIAL AS THOSE PEOPLE
MIGHT BE OR ANY PUNDIT MIGHT BE,
NO ONE IS AS INFLUENTIAL AS YOUR
FRIEND LARRY WHO SAYS I'VE BEEN
READING THIS AND TRUMP IS
DANGEROUS.
YOU TALK AND HAVE
BREAKFAST TOGETHER AND THEN YOU
HAVE CONVINCE SOMEONE WHO SAY I
WAS GOING TO VOTE FOR GARY
JOHNSON BUT WE CAN'T HAVE TRUMP
SO I'M GOING TO VOTE FOR HILLARY
CLINTON.
THEY LIVE IN OHIO AND
IT MAKES A DIFFERENCE.
STEP TWO
WOULD BE GOING THE OTHER WAY AND
REALIZING, BECAUSE AGAIN, I LOVE
THINK GARY JOHNSON MAY TAKE
VOTES FROM DONALD TRUMP BUT
RIGHT NOW IT'S VERY CLEAR THAT
IT'S ABOUT EVEN AND WHO IS
TAKING VOTES.
I'VE SEEN DIFFERENT THINGS.
THEY ARE CONFLICTING AT BEST.
BEST CASE THERE CONFLICTING,
WORST-CASE IS A CLEANEST
DOING WORSE.
JOHNSON IS THE SECOND MOST
POPULAR ALONG YOUNG VOTERS.
IF I CHANGE MY MIND ON THIS
AFTER CLINTON IS OUT ELECTED,
THE MOST INTERESTING PEOPLE ARE
HYPOCRITES.
I HAVE NO INTEREST
AT ALL IN HAVING A MEAL PEOPLE
WHO ARE HAVING CRITICAL AT ALL.
IF HILLARY CLINTON IS NOT
SUFFICIENTLY PROGRESSIVE AND
OBVIOUSLY EVERYONE WILL HAVE A
DIFFERENT STANDARD ON THAT BUT
IF THIS IS ALL NONSENSE AND HER
OPPOSITION TO THE TPP WHICH I
DON'T OPPOSE US MOTHERS DO BUT
HER OPPOSITION TO, IF SHE BACKS
OFF OF $15 AND SHE BACKS OFF OF
HER PLAN TO PROVIDE DEBT RELIEF
FOR COLLEGE AND IF SHE IS NOT
SERIOUS ABOUT RESTORING VOTING
RIGHTS IN AREAS THAT THE
PRESIDENT CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE
AND RESTRICTING THE NONVIOLENT
PRISON POPULATION, IF SHE BACKS
OFF, THEN GO GET HER.
EVEN IF
THAT MEANS LOSING AND 20/20.
I'VE A FEELING THAT IS WHAT
IS GOING TO HAPPEN.
I DON'T ME GO GET HER.
I
MEAN LITERALLY GO GET HER.
FUND
AND SUPPORT RUSS ONE GOLD FOR
HIS 20/20 RUN FOR PRESIDENT.
HAVE A DIFFERENT NOMINEE FOR
PRESIDENT AND RISK LOSING TO
THAT REPUBLICAN WHO I TRUST
WON'T BE AS AWFUL AS DONALD
TRUMP.
THE SHOULD HE SITUATION THAT
WE FIND OURSELVES IN IS IF
CLIMATE CHANGE IS THE MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE TO YOU WHICH IT
IS TO MANY PEOPLE, I THINK IT
PROBABLY SHOULD BE, IF HILLARY
CLINTON DID NOTHING NEW TO
FORESTALL THE EFFECTS OF OUR
WARNING WARMING CLIMATE AND ALL
THAT, IT WOULD STILL BE FAR
BETTER THAN CHUM BECAUSE TRUMP
SAYS HE IS GOING TO ELIMINATE
ALL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTIONS THAT OBAMA HAS PUT
INTO EFFECT AS PRESIDENT.
THAT
IS A BAD SITUATION BUT ALSO NOT
THAT COMPLICATED TO FIGURE OUT
WHICH IS THE BETTER OF THE 2.
LET'S TALK ABOUT SOME OF THE
EFFECTS.
IF THE CLIMATE
CONTINUES TO HEAT THE WAY IT IS
ESPECIALLY THE OCEANS WHICH AS I
SAID WE DON'T FOCUS ON NEARLY
ENOUGH, A NUMBER OF THINGS ARE
GOING TO TAKE PLACE.
LET'S TALK
ABOUT SOME OF THOSE.
ENTIRE
SPECIES POPULATIONS SUCH AS
PLANKTON, JELLYFISH, TORTOISE,
AND SEABIRDS ARE MOVING TOWARD
THE POLES UP TO 10∞ LATITUDE
WHICH ON A GLOBAL SCALE IS A
LONG WAY, TAKING UP RESIDENCE IN
WATERS PREVIOUSLY TOO COLD TO
SUPPORT THEM.
THAT'S FIVE TIMES
FASTER THAN LAND ANIMALS ARE
MIGRATING NORTH.
THAT DOES NOT
ONLY MEAN THAT FISHING BOATS
NEED TO TRAVEL LITTLE BIT MORE.
THAT COULD IRREPARABLY HARM OUR
ABILITY TO GET FISH OUT OF THE
OCEAN AND FEED OUR POPULATION.
IN SOUTHEAST ASIA, AS FISH
LEAVE
THEIR HOMES MARINE FISHERIES MAY
FALL UP TO 30% BY 2050.
THE
LATEST MODELS PREDICT THAT BY
2050 WARMER OCEANS WILL BLEACH
NEARLY ALL OF THE WORLD'S REEF.
WE'VE SEEN A LOT OF EVIDENCE OF
THAT.
IF YOU ARE NOT CONCERNED
WITH THE REEFS AND YOU ARE NOT
CONCERNED WITH ANIMALS, I
UNDERSTAND, WE ARE VERY HUMAN
CENTRIC SPECIES, BUT IT WILL
ALSO AFFECT US.
PEOPLE WHO LIVE
NEAR OR
INTERACT WITH OCEAN COULD BE
INCREASED RISK OF ILLNESS AS
WARMER OCEANS QUICKLY SPREAD
PATHOGEN SUCH AS CHOLERA
CARRYING
BACTERIA AND ALGAE BLOOMS.
AS
OCEAN WARMS, SO WILL SEVERE
WEATHER SUCH AS HURRICANES AND
TYPHOONS.
THE LEADER THAT WE
TALKED ABOUT IN THE VIDEO WE
SHOWED NOTED THE RARE DOUBLE
HURRICANES THAT RECENTLY SKIRTED
HAWAII.
TYPES OF EXTREME
WEATHER THAT WE'VE NEVER SEEN
BEFORE.
I DON'T KNOW ENOUGH ABOUT
THIS, BUT I KNOW THAT THAT MAKES
ME LIKE THE OVERWHELMING
MAJORITY OF AMERICANS.
I THINK
IF I WERE
TO ADVISE CLIMATE CHANGE
ADVOCATES, PEOPLE WHO THINK WE
NEED TO DO SOMETHING, THEY
NEED TO BE SCARED.
THAT IS
WHAT WORKS.
THAT'S HOW
REPUBLICANS HAVE BEEN ELECTED TO
OFFICE.
WE CAN'T JUST SAY 1
TO 4∞C BY 2100.
WE CAN'T JUST SAY 50%
OF THE REEFS WILL BE DESTROYED.
IT NEEDS TO BE TANGIBLE.
REEFER MADNESS ISN'T ENOUGH?
JOSH FOX IS INCREDIBLY SMART
AND A GIFTED FILMMAKER BUT
HE WAS REALLY HESITANT TO TALK
ABOUT THAT STUFF AND I
THINK IT IS A MISTAKE.
THE HUMAN CONSEQUENCES?
LIKE HUNGER.
CHILDREN DYING.
IF YOU WANT TO MAKE A
DIFFERENCE, THEN YOU'LL HAVE TO
GO EXTREME.
MAYBE YOU'LL PUSH A
LITTLE TOO FAR.
OBVIOUSLY
MODELS ARE DIFFERENT, BUT WE
KNOW THAT REASONABLE MODELS HAVE
PRETTY EXTREME CIRCUMSTANCES.
I
THINK WE NEED MORE OF THAT
BECAUSE WHAT REALLY MOTIVATES
AMERICANS AND THE WORLD, BUT
CERTAINLY WHAT MOTIVATES US IS
FEAR.
EVEN IF HE GETS CRUSHED
WE ARE GOING TO HAVE 45
MANY PEOPLE VOTING FOR DONALD
TRUMP.
SOMETHING TO REMEMBER.
NO MATTER HOW AWFUL HE IS, EVEN
IF HILLARY WINS BY 12 POINTS,
HE'S GOING TO HAVE 45
MILLION PEOPLE VOTING FOR HIM.
THEY WOULD STILL BE THERE
WATCHING TRUMP TV.
THEY WILL BE THERE WEDNESDAY
MORNING.
