
English: 
Imagine the scene
it was 1871
and Charles Darwin had just suggested
that we humans did not in fact walk
fully formed, out of the primordial sludge at the beginning of time
instead, in his book "The Descent of Man",
He proposed that humans descended from African apes.
Naturally, his Victorian contemporaries were all
"Ooooo... Fetch me my smelling salts..." and clutching at their pearls
and what not
and maybe you can't blame them for being shocked because Darwin's idea
is still shocking people
like a 140 years later.
But, as he often was, Darwin was right.
The amazing thing was that he proposed his theory of human evolution
when there was almost no fossil evidence
of any other kinds of Hominins
That includes us and our ape-like ancestors on Earth.
It took another 50 years for enough fossils to pile up
to start corroborating Darwin's Theory,
and another several decades to piece together
compare and argue about how these species related to each other.
Actually, that is a process that is still going on right now.
These days about two dozen Hominid species or possible species

Croatian: 
Zamislite scenu:
1871.godina je
i Charles Darwin je upravo iznio pretpostavku
da ljudi nisu u stvari nastali
u svom današnjem obliku, iz "prvobitnog mulja" na početku vremena.
Umjesto toga, u svojoj knjizi "Podrijetlo čovjeka"
iznio je pretpostavku da su ljudi potekli od afričkih majmuna.
Njegovi viktorijanski suvremenici, naravno, bili su...
"Oooo... Dohvatite mi moje mirišljave soli.." i hvatali se se za bisere
ili što već
i možda ih ne možete kriviti zbog šokiranosti jer Darwinova ideja
još uvijek šokira ljude
i 140 godina poslije.
Ali, kao što to često biva, Darwin je bio u pravu.
Izvanredna je stvar da je on postavio svoju teoriju ljudske evolucije
kada nije bilo gotovo nikakvih fosilnih dokaza
za nikakvu drugu vrstu hominida
koja bi uključivala nas i naše majmunima slične pretke na Zemlji.
Trebalo je slijedećih 50 godina da bi se skupilo dovoljno fosila
potvrđujući Darwinovu teoriju
i nekoliko slijedećih desetljeća da se oni spoje,
usporede i raspravlja se o tome kako su te vrste povezane međusobno.
U stvari, to je proces koji se i dalje odvija.
U današnje vrijeme, oko 24 vrsta ili mogućih vrsta hominida

English: 
have been identified, and while the Hominid family tree
looks sorta like a prickly bush at the moment,
taken together these fossils do show us
how our ape-like ancestors evolved into modern human awesomeness.
See, on the journey from the genus Australopithecus
to the genus Homo, our ancestors reached
a series of game changing evolutionary benchmarks.
Whether they were acquired traits or new behaviours,
that gave its species a huge advantage over the previous ones.
We exist largely because of those evolutionary breakthroughs
So, what are they?
And who else is in our family bush?
And will this be on the final?
Follow me into the facts of human evolution.
*Theme tune*
Our understanding of where we came from
has changed dramatically in just the last 50 years.
If you were a paleoanthropologist working in the 1970's,
you'd probably believe that there was a bunch

Croatian: 
je identificirano i dok ljudsko obiteljsko stablo
izgleda kao poprilično šuplje grmlje,
uzevši zajedno, ovi fosili nam zaista pokazuju
kako su se naši majmunu slični preci razvili do nevjerojatnog modernog čovjeka.
Vidite, na putu od roda Australopitecus
do roda Homo, naši su preci postigli
nekoliko važnih evolucijskih pomaka.
Bez obzira da li je to zahtijevalo nove osobine ili nova ponašanja,
dalo je tim vrstama veliku prednost pred vrstama koje su postojale prije njih.
Mi postojimo uglavnom zbog tih evolucijskih otkrića.
Pa, koja su to otkrića?
I tko je još u našem obiteljskom grmu?
I hoće li to biti posljednje?
Pogledajmo činjenice o evoluciji čovjeka.
 
Naše razumijevanje toga od kuda smo došli
dramatično se promijenilo u samo posljednjih 50 godina
Da ste bili paleoantropolog u 1970-ima
vjerojatno biste vjerovali da je postojalo puno

English: 
of different human species running around on Earth
for millions of years, and that they all sorta interbred
when they bumped into each other.
This is known as the 'Multiregional Hypothesis'
and it suggested that Neanderthals in Europe,
for example evolved into Modern Europeans.
While Homo Erectus in China would have been the predecessor
of Modern Asians,
and that Java Man found in Indonesia
would have been the ancestor
to Australian Aboriginal Peoples.
These days Multiregionalism has fallen out of favor,
mostly because in the 1980's researchers started
studying mitochondrial DNA.
That's the ancient DNA found in the mitochondria of our cells,
which is totally separate from the DNA in our cell's nuclei,
that's the stuff that we inherit from both our parents.
Mitochondrial DNA, on the other hand, is passed down
only from the mothers to their offspring
and by following its various mutations over time
and across populations, scientists have been able
to track the migration of humans over the past 200,000 years.
All the way back to a single ancestral population
of modern humans in Africa.
This genetic evidence combined with the fact that

Croatian: 
skupina ljudskih vrsta koje su živjele na Zemlji
milijunima godinama, i da su se one miješale
kad su se susretale.
To je poznato kao multiregionalna teorija
koja pretpostavlja da su neandertalci u Europi,
na primjer, evoluirali u moderne Europljane,
dok je Homo erectus u Kini predak
modernih Azijaca
a Java čovjek, nađen u Indoneziji,
predak
australskih Aboriđina.
Danas ta teorija nije najzastupljenija
većinom zato što u 1980-ima istraživači počinju
istraživati mitohondrijalni DNA.
To je prastari DNA nađen u mitohondrijima naših stanica
koji je totalno drugačiji od DNA u jezgrama naših stanica,
kojeg nasljeđujemo od oba roditelja.
Mitohondrijalni DNA se, međutim, prenosi
samo preko majke na potomstvo
i, prateći njihove raznovrsne mutacije kroz vrijeme
i na različitom stanovništvu, znanstvenici mogu pratiti
migracije ljudi tijekom proteklih 200 000 godina.
Sve do jedine skupine zajedničkih predaka
modernih ljudi u Africi.
Ovaj genetski dokaz, zajedno s činjenicom

English: 
all of the oldest Hominin fossils have come from Africa,
led to the Out of Africa Hypothesis
which suggests that anatomically modern humans
evolved exclusively in Africa
and then spread across the world in 2 different waves.
One wave which happened anywhere from 70,000 to 125,000 years ago
took a right-hand-turn out of Africa, populating the Middle East, Asia, Indonesia, and Australia.
The second wave happened much later and headed straight up through Europe.
So that's currently the most popular idea about where we came from
but when it comes to how hominins evolved,
there are only a few thing we're sure about.
For starters, there did used to be a lot of different species of people running around
and now there's only one.
And thought we share the vast majority of our DNA with chimps
Our common ancestor with them probably lived about 7 million years ago, maybe more
It was about a million years after that break with chimps
that the Homo Sapiens saga really began when a segment of an ancient population of apes
acquired the first real breakthrough in human evolution, bipedalism.

Croatian: 
da su najstariji fosili hominida nađeni u Africi,
doveli su do teorije "iz Afrike",
koja smatra da anatomski moderni ljudi
evoluiraju isključivo u Africi
i onda se šire po svijetu u 2 različita vala.
Jedan val, koji počinje prije otprilike 125 000 - 70 000 godina,
ide na istok uz Afrike, naseljavajući Bliski istok i Aziju, Indoneziju i Australiju.
Drugi val desio se puno kasnije i išao je ravno u Europu.
To je, dakle, danas najpopularnija teorija o tome otkuda smo,
ali kad je riječ o tome kako su ljudi evoluirali,
ima samo nekoliko stvari u koje smo sigurni.
Za početak, stvarno je postojalo nekoliko različitih vrsta ljudi koje su živjele,
a danas je samo jedna.
Iako dijelimo najveći dio svojih gena s čimpanzama,
naš zajednički predak živio je vjerojatno prije 7 milijuna godina ili više.
Nakon otprilike milijun godina od odvajanja s čimpanzama,
stvarno započinje Homo sapiens saga, kad je dio stare majmunske vrste
ostvario prvo veliko otkriće u razvoju čovjeka - bipedalizam (hod na dvije noge).

Croatian: 
Tada su neki majmuni počeli hodati uspravno na 2 noge.
Bilo je nekoliko različitih ranih vrsta takvih majmuna
i oni su vjerojatno evoluirali u australopiteke,
koje možemo nazvati "baka i djed".
Australopiteci nisu bili toliko različiti od ostalih afričkih majmuna.
Bili su jednake veličine, imali su mozak jednake veličine
i u stvari su prvi australopiteci, kao Lucy, 3,2 milijuna godina star fosil australopiteka
nađen u Etiopiji 1974., vjerojatno bili visoki oko jednog metra
i nisu izgledali puno drugačije od današnje čimpanze.
Ali mi znamo da je Lucy hodala uspravno prema obliku njenih kostiju
jer smo našli fosilizirane otiske stopala njenih "prijatelja".
Još jedna od teorija koja opisuje zašto se razvio hod na dvije noge
kaže da je to posljedica smanjenja afričkih šuma zbog promjena klime.
Zato su rani hominidi bili prisiljeni hodati savanama, gdje im je hod na dvije noge
omogućio da lakše uoče grabežljivce, hodaju duže,
i beru voće s drveća.
Hod na dvije noge bio je važan i jer je oslobodio naša dva uda.
Kad imate dvije ruke koje samo vise i ne rade ništa,
sljedeći logičan korak je da uzmete kamen, počnete udarati stvari

English: 
This is when apes somewhat obviously started walking upright and on two feet
And there were a couple of different, early, semi-bipedal genera of apes
And these probably evolved into the australopithecines
Who we can call grandma and grandpa.
Australopithecines weren't that different from other ancient African apes
They were about the same size and they had the same size brains
In fact, the first australopithecines like Lucy, the 3.2 million year old australopithecus aferensis fossil
found in Ethiopia in 1974, was probably about a meter tall
and didn't look too different from a modern chimp.
But we know that Lucy walked upright due to the shape of her bones
and because we found fossilized footprints of her buddies.
And though there are a few different theories about why bipedalism may have evolved
it seems to have happened just as the dense African forests were shrinking due to climate change.
So early hominins may have been forced out onto the grasslands where bipedalism
made it easier to spot predators, to travel long distances,
and to pick fruit off trees.
But bipedalism was most important because it freed up two of our limbs.
When you got two hands just hanging out not doing anything
the next obvious step is to pick up a rock and start smashing stuff.

Croatian: 
i evo...
Imate majmuna... koji koristi alat.
I to je dovelo do druge važne točke evolucije, precizno držanje.
Kako su evoluirali, sve su više i više koristili ruke za držanje i upotrebu manjih predmeta,
a ne više za kretanje po drveću kao do tada.
Pa, s vremenom, velike i zakrivljene ruke, koje povezujemo s čimpanzama i gorilama,
su zamijenjene s manjim, spretnijim rukama s jakim palcem
koje možete vidjeti na kraju svojih ruku.
Ove su ruke praktičnije za izrađivanje oruđa. Naš prvi predak koji je izrađivao oružje
bio je Homo habilis, popularno nazvan "majstor".
Homo habilis je prvi hominid zabilježen među fosilima koji izgledom sliči na čovjeka
i postaje najraniji pripadnik ljudskog roda.
Prvi se put pojavio prije oko 2,4 milijuna godina i vjerojatno je bio direktan potomak australopiteka.
Moram reći "vjerojatno" jer, znate, nismo tada bili tamo i uvijek će biti "rupa" u fosilnim ostacima.
Iako Homo habilis vjerojatno nije mogao popraviti perilicu suđa, mogao bi
je razbiti u komadiće pomoću kamena.

English: 
And voilà
You got an ape... using a tool
And this led to the second major characteristic to advance human evolution, a precision grip.
As hominins evolved, they used their hands more and more for gripping and manipulating small objects
than swinging through trees and what have you.
So over time, the big curved hands that we associate with chimps and gorillas
were replaced with smaller, more nimble hands with  powerful thumbs
that you can see at the end of your arms right now.
These hands were better suited for using slicing tools and our first tool making ancestor
may have been Homo Habilis, aka handy man
Homo Habilis was the first obviously human-like hominin in the fossil record
and he's thought to be the earliest member of the Homo genus.
He first appeared about 2.4 million years ago and was probably the direct descendant of the australopithecines.
I have to say probably because, you know, I wasn't there and there will always be holes in the fossil record.
And Homo Habilis probably couldn't have fixed your dish washer but he could totally have smashed it to pieces
with a rock.

English: 
In addition to acquiring more dexterous hands, Homo Habilis ate meat.
Its omnivorous diet was a new thing for previously vegetarian hominins
and it turned out to be another game changer for the genus Homo
because it kick-started the process of encephalization.
Or the growth of the brain in relation to the overall body mass.
See building and maintaining brains requires a ton of calories,
so even though the first omnivorous hominins were probably scavenging gazelle scraps from saber tooth cats or something
Meat was a big enough part of their diet that their brain size increased pretty rapidly.
Some argue that Homo Habilis was also probably the first human ancestor to figure out how to cook food.
Cooking unlocks all sorts of calories and nutrients from vegetables and tubers
as well as making rotten, scavenged meat less dangerous.
So overall nutrition for these guys improved a LOT around this time,
and brains as a result got bigger.
But it wasn't just brain size that evolved, the pattern of brain growth was really important too.
Over time, our ancestors temporal lobes which house the centers for language processing

Croatian: 
Zahvaljujući tim sposobnijim rukama, Homo habilis je jeo meso.
Takva prehrana, koja uključuje i meso i biljke, bila je nova stvar za prethodno vegetarijanske hominide
i pokazalo se da je to još jedan važan napredak za razvoj ljudskog roda.
Jer, kad je započeo proces razvoja i rasta mozga,
povećavala se veličina mozga u odnosu na ukupnu masu tijela.
Razvoj i korištenje mozga zahtijeva veliku količinu kalorija,
pa pretpostavljamo da su prvi svejedi hominidi uglavnom koristili ostatke gazela koje su ostale nakon što su ih uhvatile i djelomično pojele velike mačke.
Meso je bilo velik dio njihove prehrane, pa se veličina njihovog mozga ubrzano povećavala.
Neki kažu da je Homo habilis bio vjerojatno prvi ljudski predak koji je shvatio kako peći i kuhati hranu.
Kuhanje je omogućilo bolje iskorištavanje hranjivih tvari iz biljaka i gomolja
ali i smanjila opasnost od jedenja trulih životinjskih ostataka.
Sveukupna prehrana ovih ljudi jako se popravila u to doba,
i mozak je, kao rezultat toga, postao veći.
Ali, nije se povećala samo veličina mozga, već je važan i način kako se razvijao mozak.
S vremenom, temporalni režanj naših predaka, koji omogućava govor

Croatian: 
i prednji režanj koji omogućava donošenje složenijih odluka i oblikuje društveno ponašanje
rasli su više od ostalih dijelova mozga.
Neki istraživači misle da to ima dosta veze s znatnim poboljšanjima u ishrani
i u isto vrijeme potrebi za rješavanjem društvenih problema koji postaju sve važniji.
Jedan od razloga za to može se naći u fosilima Homo ergastera
koji se razvio prije oko 1,6 milijuna godina.
Mnogi misle da je on potomak Homo habilisa.
Oni su još više sličili modernim ljudima nego Homo habilisi,
imali su manje čeljusti, oštrije zube , bili su viši i tanje građe tijela.
Također, bili su vjerojatno, prvi hominidi koji su bili gotovo bez dlaka.
Jedan od interesantnih detalja o Homo ergasteru je da su imali kukove tako uske da je porod djeteta bez pomoći
bio jako težak. Kako je ergaster imao veći mozak, tako su i njihova djeca vjerojatno imala
znatno veće glave od djece prijašnjih hominida.
Tako su dječje glave postajale veća a ženske zdjelice postajale su uže.
Jedino rješenje bilo je da se djeca rađaju prije nego im je mozak sasvim razvijen
kako bi mogli proći kroz porođajni kanal.

English: 
and the prefontal cortices which help with complex decision making and moderating social behavior
grew disproportionately to the other parts of their brain.
Some researchers think this had a lot to do with the vastly improved diet
and at the same time a need to solve social problems which was becoming more and more important.
One reason for this can be found in the fossils of Homo Ergaster
Which came on the scene about 1.65 million years ago
A lot of people think it's the desendent og Homo Habilis
They looked even more like modern humans than Homo Habilis
They had smaller jaws, and sharper teeth, and were taller and more slender.
They were also probably the first mostly hairless hominins
But one very interesting detail is that Homo Ergaster had hips so narrow as to make the unassisted delivery
of a baby very difficult. And since Ergaster had bigger brains, their babies had to have probably also
considerably larger than those of past hominin babies.
So, baby heads were getting bigger as females pelvises were getting smaller.
The only solution was for babies to be born before their brains were fully formed
so that they could pass through the birth canal.

Croatian: 
Ali to je značilo da će nakon rođenja dijete biti manje razvijeno i zahtijevati više pažnje nego prije
i to kroz duže vrijeme.
To je zahtijevalo od ergastera i kasnijih pripadnika ljudskog roda da razviju još jedno otkriće.
Ono koje je moguće samo s velikim razvijenim mozgom.
Govorim, naravno, o složenom društvenom ponašanju.
Više nego bilo tko prije pripadnici Homo ergastera stvarno su trebali jedni druge.
Za rađanje djece, za brigu o djeci kojoj je trebalo dugo vremena za odrastu,
za nalaženje hrane potrebne za potrebe svih, i za lov, koji je ergaster vjerojatno izvodio u skupinama.
Također je moguće da je Homo ergaster bio prvi ljudski predak koji je napustio Afriku,
možda u potrazi za boljim lovištima.
Kosti ergastera, datirane oko 1, 75 milijuna godina, nađene su na području Gruzije i Armenije.
Nedugo poslije, počeli su se razvijati genijalni Homo erectusi,
prvi rani ljudi, čiji fosili su nađeni u velikom broju izvan Afrike.
Čini se da im je jako dobro išlo.
Erectusi su ostavili tragove od Afrike kroz cijelu Aziju u razdoblju prije oko 1,8 - 1,5 milijuna godina

English: 
But this meant that after birth, babies were less developed, requiring more care than ever
and for a longer time.
This required Ergaster and later members of the Homo genus to develop another breakthrough
That could only be possible with big sophisticated brains.
I'm talking, of course, about complex social behavior.
More so than anyone who came before them members of Homo Ergaster really needed each other.
For delivering each other's babies, for caring babies that took freaking forever to mature
For finding enough food to sustain everybody, and for hunting, which Ergaster probably did in groups.
It's also possible that Homo Ergaster was the first human to leave Africa
Maybe in search of better hunting grounds
Ergaster bones dated to around 1.75 million years ago and have been found around the border of Armenia and Georgia.
Shortly afterward we start seeing the genus Homo Erectus
The first early human whose fossils have been found in large numbers outside of Africa
And it seems like they did really well for themselves

English: 
Homo Erectus, was kind of my favorite grandpa.
Or maybe great uncle. Nobody's sure.
Because during the heyday of Homo Erectus, about 400,000 to 600,000 year ago
we begin to see another species of hominin.
Homo Heidelbegensis which some believe to be the direct descendant of Homo Ergaster
Since they were very similar with a couple of exceptions.
For instance, some scientists believe that Heidelbegensis was the first hominin species to bury their dead
But possibly the most important thing about Homo Heidelbegensis is that many believe
It's the direct predecessor to modern Homo Sapiens.
And possibly, also to our thick-browed cousins the Neanderthals, aka Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis
Or Homo Neanderthalensis.
One theory is that a population of Heidelbergensis remained in Africa
and modern humans descended from them, while other Heidelbergensis hoofed it up through Europe

Croatian: 
i izumrli su prije oko 27 000 godina.
Moguće je da su oni prva vrsta koja je putovala morem i gradila skloništa za sebe.
Homo erectus je bio neka vrsta "omiljenog djeda"
ili "praujaka", nitko nije siguran.
Jer, za vrijeme Homo erectusa, prije oko 600 000 - 400 000 godina
vidimo pojavu nove vrste hominida -
Homo Heidelbergensis, za kojeg neki misle da je direktan potomak Homo ergastera
jer su bili vrlo slični s nekoliko izuzetaka.
Heidelbergensis je imao puno veći mozak od ergastera,
neki fosili lubanja ukazuju da je njihov mozak mogao biti velik kao i mozak modernog čovjeka
i čini se da su bili puno društveno napredniji.
Na primjer, neki znanstvenici misle da su Heidelbergensisi bili prva ljudska vrsta koja je pokapala svoje mrtve.
No najvažnija činjenica o Homo Heidelbergensisu je da mnogi misle
da su direktni preci modernog Homo sapiensa
i vjerojatno naših vrlo bliskih rođaka, Neandertalaca.
 
Jedna teorija kaže da je dio populacije Heidelbergensisa ostao u Africi
i da su moderni ljudi potekli od njih, dok su ostali Heidelbergensisi naselili Europu

English: 
and Neanderthals derived from that group.
This, like many other things in human evolution is hotly contested.
What we do know is that
And though they had pronounced brow ridges and were heavier set than we are
They look pretty similar to modern humans
Their brains seem to have been a little bit larger than ours,
and modern humans and neanderthals apparently shared some cultural habits,
like burying our dead, making art,
and using tools to beat the crap out of each other.
And of course, they totally found some time to get it on with each other
we've been able to reconstruct almost the entire neanderthal genome
and it turns out, that about 2.5% of our DNA is from some neanderthals who - I guess -
some of our great-great-great...-great-grandmothers
spend a great night within a cave in Israel!
So that brings us up through modern humans, but the story of our ancestry
is always changing, because exciting discoveries are being made all the time.
For instance, in 2004 researchers found fossils of Homo Floresiensis

Croatian: 
i od te su se grupe razvili neandertalci.
Kao i mnoge druge stvari u ljudskoj evoluciji, to je teško dokazati.
Ono što znamo je da su neandertalci i moderni ljudi živjeli zajedno oko 30 000 godina.
Neandertalci su živjeli po cijeloj Europi u razdoblju od prije oko 200 000 do 28 000 godina
i iako su imali izražene čeone kosti i zdepastija tijela
bili su slični modernim ljudima.
Njihov je mozak bio i veći nego mozak današnjih ljudi,
a imali su i razvijeno kulturno ponašanje
kao, npr., pokapanje mrtvih, stvaranje umjetnosti
i korištenje alata da bi se međusobno "porazbijali".
I, naravno, nalazili su vremena da se međusobno druže.
Možemo rekonstruirati gotovo cijeli genom neandertalaca
i ispada da 2, 5% našeg DNA potječe od nekog neandertalca koji, pretpostavljam,
je proveo neko vrijeme s našom pra, pra... bakom
u špilji negdje u Izraelu.
To nas dovodi do modernih ljudi, ali priča o našim precima
se uvijek mijenja jer se zanimljiva otkrića stalno javljaju.
Npr., 2004. istraživači su našli fosile Homo Floresiensisa,

English: 
a.k.a. the Hobbit, a tiny person that lived about until 13'000 years ago
in what is now Indonesia. Even more recently,
in 2008, fossils of a new people, the Denisovans, or Denisova Hominin
were discovered, researchers think may have overlapped, and possible, interbred with modern humans,
and the discovery of Australopithecus Sediba, also in 2008,
has some paleo-anthropaleologists in a dither about whether it could be the real
direct progenitor for the genus homo, and also the first tool maker.
So, it's an exciting time to be researching our origins.
No one's really sure what killed off these other species, some theories suggest
it was climate change, or a catastrophic event like a supervolcano eruption,
or simply not being able to compete with [points fingers] This.
Maybe we are the survivors because of our big brains,
we had to evolve to help each other out,
and because we eventually developed agriculture about 10'000 years ago,
which caused a huge population explosion
that is still going on today. But now,
it's just us. Which makes me a little bit sad.
It's pretty strange to think that if we went back in time just a 100'000 years,

Croatian: 
popularno nazvanog "Hobit", malih ljudi koji su živjeli prije oko 13 000 godina
u današnjoj Indoneziji. Ili još kasnije,
2008. otkriven je fosil nove skupine ljudi, Denisov hominin
koji su živjeli istovremeno kao i moderan čovjek i možda se s njima miješali.
Također, otkriće Australopiteka Sediba 2008.
potaknulo je neke paleoantropologe da se zapitaju može li to biti pravi
direktni potomak roda Homo i prvi izrađivač alata.
Dakle, ovo je zanimljivo vrijeme za istraživanje naših podrijetla.
Nitko nije siguran što je ubilo većinu ovih vrsta. Neke teorije smatraju
da su to klimatske promjene ili katastrofalni događaji poput erupcije supervulkana
ili se jednostavno nisu mogli natjecati s "ovime".
Možda smo mi preživjeli zbog svog velikog mozga,
ili smo se morali razviti da bi pomogli jedni drugima
ili jer smo, s vremenom, razvili poljodjelstvo prije oko 10 000 godina
što je dovelo do velikog porasta broja stanovnika
koji i danas traje. Ali danas,
tu smo samo mi. To me čini malo tužnim.
Čini se čudnim da ako odemo malo dalje u prošlost, samo nekih 100 000 godina

English: 
like yesterday afternoon, geologically speaking,
we'd be sharing the earth with 6 different kinds of humans.
Somethin' tells me that playing Mario Party with a neanderthal would be like
would be like a dozen different kinds of awesome, but
I guess I'll never know.
Thank you for watching this exceptionally long SciShow infusion
couldn't help it, there was a lot to cover
If you have any questions / ideas, please leave them down below in the comments
or on Facebook and Twitter, and we'll see you next time.
*Theme tune*

Croatian: 
što je, geološki gledano, bilo jučer poslijepodne,
dijelili bismo Zemlju sa 6 različitih vrsta ljudi.
Nešto mi kaže da bi igrati "Super Mario" s neandertalcima bilo
stvarno izvrsno, ali,
to nikad nećemo znati.
Hvala vam što ste gledali ovaj iznimno dug SciShow infusion,
nije bilo pomoći, bilo je dosta toga što je trebalo reći.
Ako imate pitanja ili ideja, postavite ih, molim, u komentarima ispod
ili na Facebooku i Twitteru. Vidimo se slijedeći put.
 
