May Allah's peace, mercy and his greetings be upon you
All praise is due to Allah, Lord of the worlds
and may the blessings and peace of Allah be upon the most honored of messengers; our master Muhammad
and upon all his family and companion.
Welcome all!
Stephen Hawking, a theoretical physicist, was indeed industrious - in his specialization,
even though he wasn't awarded noble prize.
But the major problem he had is he always talked and debated in fields other than his specialization,
so he comes up with strange things [results].
Hawking was known for his flattery [blarney] to atheists since his first scientific journey.
He took part in a hypothesis with Hartle;
known as Hartle–Hawking state.
It states, Time could be imaginary and measured by negative numbers.
A negative hour, 2 negative hours, a negative year
or a negative century!
In the scientific community, those were jokes to make fun of Hartle–Hawking state.
Many scientists responded to Hawking, including Herbert Dengler,
who is the Head of Royal Astronomical Society
in England.
and he said, "There's no such a thing called imaginary negative time."
Nothing can be found or known like a negative hour
or a negative century.
as imaginary negative time is not a physical quantity
thus, physically, it can't be existed.
so negative square root  is just science fiction
in Hartle–Hawking state -
Hawking published his last book: The Grand Design
in 2010
Hawking says in its introduction,
"Philosophy has died [perished] - there's nothing called (philosophy)."
However, the whole book - of his - is a philosophy.
the book is fraught with philosophy
Hawking, within his book, tried to compose
a philosophic idea called (Model dependent realism)
This idea is mainly based
on hologram Sufi [mystical] perceptions
that's near to Berkeley's philosophy.
Whenever Hawking speaks outside his specialization, he comes up with strange things as usual.
I read that book few months after it was published.
I expected it would be a rich physics book,
but the entire book never mentioned a single new scientific piece of information.
the book only contains philosophical perspectives
to existing scientific ideas.
In fairness, Hawking wrote many pages - in that book - about creativity, accuracy and perfectionism
in this physical [material] world.
yet he devoted half page for: gravity before Big Bang.
This is another hypothesis which is considered
the biggest mistake Hawking has ever made.
Hawking said that there might be law of gravitation before Big Bang.
Now we can ask a simple direct question,
"What's the origin [source] of gravity law?
Who legalized that law?
Who made it get its impact?
Moreover, law of gravity can't make [lead to]
the ball pool - to - roll.
Also the ball won't move even if we added the gravity law to the ball and billiard stick either.
You need action and involvement
to make the ball pool roll.
Only here - when doing so - the effect of gravity law appears.
Stephen Hawking supposed that gravity law is fair enough to create the ball, stick and the player as well.
another example,
Internal combustion law, inside car engine isn't enough for the engine to its function.
As you need petrol and spark
only here the effect of law appears.
According to Stephen Hawking's perception concerning gravity,
Internal combustion law - inside the car engine - is fair enough to create the engine, petrol, spark, driver
and the road as well.
The law isn't an independent entity,
but it's just a mathematical description
to a specific phenomenon.
The law only appears synchronically with the phenomenon.
Clive Lewis, an atheist Irish thinker, said that addition law in math tells you how much money you got in bank account,
one thousand plus one thousand equals two thousands.
1000+1000=2000
addition law in math doesn't give you extra money.
Law cannot produce a balance [result] on his own.
Stephen Hawking always comes up with strange things [oddity and wonders],
when he speaks outside of his specialization or tries to flatter [blarney] to atheists.
apart from those mistakes of Hawking,
Can Hawking's scientific efforts make him enter the paradise?
This is a funny question,
but it has been asked a lot lately,
We - Muslims - can't affirm the last dwell; heaven or hell
for a particular person.
except for those God tells us about.
Generally, whoever heard of the message of Prophet Muhammad PBUH and had rejected it before he died, then he will dwell in hell.
As Prophet Muhammad PBUH
says in the authenticated Hadith:
"By Him in Whose hand is the life of Muhammad,
he who amongst the community of Jews or Christians hears about me,
but does not affirm his belief in that with which I have been sent and dies in this state (of disbelief),
he shall be but one of the denizens of Hell-Fire."
This Hadith is authenticated for sure.
The message of Islam is the only monotheism message on earth today.
If Stephen Hawking and any scientist or thinker looks into the universe,
he can be sure that its Creator must be One!
Neither pagan nor polytheistic perceptions
will come to his mind.
we tend to monotheism congenitally.
Monotheism is the appropriate consideration.
But what about Hawking's great scientific works?
Can't those works and achievements help him get a high rank after death [during judgment day]?
This question is similar to this case:
an employee asks for pension from a company he had never worked for!
Hawking didn't do his work for the sake of God or his reward.
The case isn't about doing good,
as we do good Innately.
The right question would be,
"For whom do you do good?"
Do you do good for the sake of personal interest; glory, wealth, propaganda or fame?
I think Stephen Hawking got his full share concerning this section personal interests.
or Do you do good for the sake of God?!
to hope you get its reward and worship Him.
I think Stephen Hawking knows now
for whom he was doing good.
and I'm pretty sure that each one of us know the answer to this question.
I ask Allah [God the Almighty] to help our deeds succeed and forgives us all.
May Allah's peace, mercy and his greetings be upon you!
