In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court
legalized abortion nationwide.
The decision is called Roe vs Wade, and
those who defend it are known as RoeBots.
This is how they think...
*Robot Voice*
First off, this assumes that 
once abortion is illegal,
every woman with an unplanned pregnancy 
will place her baby for adoption.
That is clearly not true given that even 
the most unwanted pregnancies
do not automatically 
produce unwanted babies.
In fact, it may very well be that a high 
percentage of all pregnancies are unplanned
and a significant number of 
them are even unwanted.
But we also know that only a small 
percentage of the babies produced
by those pregnancies are 
placed for adoption.
Second, this argument also assumes
that the people on waiting lists to 
adopt would only adopt one child.
But the truth is, if the number of adoptable
babies increased, the cost of adoption would
plummet and make it possible for the people
on waiting lists to adopt more than one.
And you can bet that the vast majority of
them would jump at that opportunity.
Also, the reduced cost of 
adoption would dramatically
increase the number of lower and middle 
income families who could afford to adopt.
As it stands right now,
most of these people know that they 
cannot possibly come up with the
tens of thousands of dollars it takes to adopt 
a baby -  so they don’t even get in the system.
But that doesn’t mean they wouldn’t make
good parents if given the chance.
Other factors that increase the pool 
of potential adoptive parents
is the growing problem of 
infertility and the fact that
there is now less stigma attached to 
single parent adoptions than in the past.
The bottom line is, you need to 
remember that every single time
you hear someone from the 
abortion lobby attack adoption,
what you are really hearing is 
someone trying to conceal the fact
that every baby they butcher and toss in a 
dumpster is very much wanted by someone.
Thanks for watching!
