
Chinese: 
無政府主義、
社會無政府主義和自願捐助制度
政府的問題沒有任何政治解決方案。每四年投票選出有
名無實的的新領袖從未能夠、永遠不會，也永遠不可能產生
任何重大持久的正向改變，原因是政府無法從內部改進或棄惡從善。
有太多的既得利益；沒有一個中央集權系統，無論是君主政體、寡頭政治、
共產主義、民主、共和國還是獨裁政府，尊重個人選擇不被統治的權利。
共產主義、民主、共和國還是獨裁政府，尊重個人選擇不被統治的權利。
當黑手黨來你開業的地方時，他們都會像朋友一樣對待你，

English: 
Anarchism, Agorism, and Voluntaryism
There is no political solution to the problem
of government. Voting for a new ceremonial
figurehead every four years has never, will
never, and could never create any significant
lasting positive change because governments
cannot be improved or made moral from within. There
are too many vested interests and no Statist
system, be it Monarchy, Oligarchy, Communism,
Democracy, Republic, or Dictatorship, respects
the right of the individual to opt-out of
being governed.
When the mafia comes around to your business,
they always befriend and promise to protect

Chinese: 
承諾如果你交保護費和服從他們的話，他們就會保護你。
不過，如果你拒絕，黑手黨就會把你的店家夷為平地。
同樣地，所有中央集權政府都承諾只要我們付錢
和聽話，他們就會幫助和保護百姓，但如果我們不從，那麼他們就會逮捕我們、查封我們的資產、讓我們坐牢。
和聽話，他們就會幫助和保護百姓，但如果我們不從，那麼他們就會逮捕我們、查封我們的資產、讓我們坐牢。
整個問題就是：賦予一個特權階級法定權益和義務來對所有其他人施以暴力和脅迫。
世界各國的政府都對百姓（透過警察）施以暴力和（透過稅收）加以脅迫，這絕對是不道德、令人無法接受的。
世界各國的政府都對百姓（透過警察）施以暴力和（透過稅收）加以脅迫，這絕對是不道德、令人無法接受的。
兩廂情願的性關係合乎道德，因為是自願的，而強姦不道德，因為是被迫的。
同樣地，慈善捐款和自由市場合乎道德，因為是自願性的，而竊盜和課稅不道德，因為是強迫性的。

English: 
you, providing you pay and obey them. If
you refuse to comply, however, the mafia burns
your business to the ground. Similarly all
Statist governments promise to help and protect
their populations as long as we pay and obey,
but if we don’t then they seize our asses
and our assets and throw us in prison. The
whole problem is giving one privileged class
the legal right and obligation to commit violence
and coercion against the rest of the population. All
governments around the world initiate the
use of violence (in the form of police) and
coercion (in the form of taxes) against their
populations and this is absolutely immoral
and unacceptable.
Consensual sex is moral because it is voluntary,
whereas rape is immoral because it is forced. Similarly,
things like charity donations and the free
market are moral because they are voluntary,

English: 
whereas theft and taxation are immoral because
they are forced. The root problem festering
within all governments around the world is
not the rife internal corruption or criminality,
those are merely symptoms and side-effects
of Statism. The paramount problem with government
is that its mandates are mandatory, its compulsions
are compulsory.
For governments to be moral institutions,
all taxes and interactions must be made voluntary.
If governments are honestly in existence for
our benefit then they must be voluntary and
never initiate the use of force against their
populations. That kind of authoritarian violence
and coercion is not allowed or acceptable
in any other facet of our lives; we wouldn’t
put up with having our homes and businesses
burned down, so why do we sheepishly line

Chinese: 
同樣地，慈善捐款和自由市場合乎道德，因為是自願性的，而竊盜和課稅不道德，因為是強迫性的。
世界各國政府不斷惡化的癥結不在於內部貪腐或犯罪充斥，那些都只是中央集權的症狀和副作用。
世界各國政府不斷惡化的癥結不在於內部貪腐或犯罪充斥，那些都只是中央集權的症狀和副作用。
政府最主要的問題是，它的命令是強制性的、義務是強迫性的。
各國政府若要成為合乎道德規範的機構，所有稅項及其互動關係即必須出於自願。
如果政府真的是為我們的福祉而存在，那麼這些制度即必須是自願行動，
絕不對百姓施以武力。在我們生活中任何其它方面都不允許或接
受這種獨裁暴力和脅迫；我們不會容忍我們的家庭和事業任人宰割，
所以為什麼每 4 年都乖乖排隊投票選出新的傀儡總統，

Chinese: 
相信他們會用某種方法讓黑手黨遵守道德規範？
相信他們會用某種方法讓黑手黨遵守道德規範？
只要是為政府工作，不管你是軍人、警察、政客還是擔任其它職位，
你的薪水都來自百姓被迫繳納的稅收，
讓你成了罪犯代表。因此，任職於中央集權政府（就像為黑手黨工作）
是不道德、犯罪的，因為你的薪資來自贓款。換句話說，
所有的政府職員，每個擔任公職、受益於政府社會方案的人，
就像駕駛搶劫案逃逸車輛的司機。他們可能沒有親自偷你的錢，
可是你的錢就在他們的口袋裡，所以如果他們不必負責，還有誰呢？
我對什麼「主義」都不感興趣，在你發表一個明智見解的當下，

English: 
up to vote for a new puppet president every
4 years, thinking they are somehow going to
make the mafia moral?
Simply working for the government, whether
you’re a soldier, policeman, politician
or otherwise, your salary comes from the taxes
the population are forced to pay, making you
a criminal by proxy. Thus working for Statist
governments (like working for the mafia) is
immoral and criminal because your paycheck
comes from stolen money. In other words,
all government employees, everyone working
for them and benefiting from their social
programs, are like get-away drivers in a robbery. They
may not have personally stolen your money,
but your money is right there in their pockets,
so who is responsible if not them?
I’m not a fan of ‘-isms’, but the second
you express a sound idea, the establishment

English: 
is quick to re-brand your revolution and assimilate
your inspiration into an ‘-ism’ they
can control. For instance, Anarchy, a once
respectable term simply meaning ‘without
rulers’, advocating society without government,
has long been re-branded hand-in-hand with
‘Chaos’ wearing bandana face-masks, throwing
Molotov cocktails. The actual idea of non-violent
sovereign societies enlightened and capable
beyond the need for Statist governance, however,
is certainly ideal, and not chaos.
The terms ‘Agorism’ and ‘Voluntaryism’ are
similar ideas advocating only voluntary interactions
between people and the State. Call it what
you will, Anarchism, Agorism, Voluntaryism,
or just keep it simple and call it Freedom;
it is the missing ingredient in all governments

Chinese: 
當權者就馬上把你的革新思想重新包裝、將你的靈感吸收轉化為他們可以控制的一個「主義」。
舉例來說：無政府狀態，原本是值得尊敬的名稱，其中含義單純只是「無統治者」，
提倡沒有政府的社會，長期以來卻已被重新捏造成與「混亂」
密切聯結在一起，跟戴著面罩、投擲汽油彈劃上等號。
然而，開明、能夠超脫對中央集權治理需求的非暴力主權社會的實際理念，無疑是典範，而不是混亂。
然而，開明、能夠超脫對中央集權治理需求的非暴力主權社會的實際理念，無疑是典範，而不是混亂。
「社會無政府主義」和「自願捐助制度」都是類似的理念，
提倡人民和國家之間的互動只有自願性互動。隨你怎麼稱呼：無政府主義、
社會無政府主義、自願捐助制度，還是就單純稱之為自由；它是所有政府缺少的要素、

English: 
and the root of all State corruption and criminality. If
people want to have a bureaucracy of diplomats
creating a bunch of social programs for their
benefit (what governments claim to be) then
that’s fine, but just because some guy in
a suit wrote something on a piece of paper
doesn’t make it mandatory, and just because
the mafia says “you’d better pay up” doesn’t
mean you should.

Chinese: 
所有國家貪污和犯罪的根源。
如果人們要有官僚制度為他們的福祉（政府聲稱如此）
建立一堆社會方案，那沒關係，
但只是因為某個穿著西裝的傢伙在紙上寫了些字，並不代表那就具有強制性，而只因為黑手黨說「你最好給錢」，並不代表你就該付錢。
但只是因為某個穿著西裝的傢伙在紙上寫了些字，並不代表那就具有強制性，而只因為黑手黨說「你最好給錢」，並不代表你就該付錢。
