
English: 
And so here we are at the end with one last question.
How will quantum computing change our lives?
if our desktops and our phones are not going to be quantum machines any time soon
what will the quantum revolution mean to us?
Richard Feynman once said you can't truly model a quantum universe on a non quantum machine
and the ramifications of that are profound.
Optimists posit that quantum computing will revolutionize everything from engineering to medicine,
consider the field of chemistry if we could model things more accurately at the
molecular and quantum level we could better simulate how chemicals interact with the human body.
We could better understand how the medicines we take get distributed at the lowest level.
We could remove the veil from neurochemical

French: 
Et nous voici donc avec une dernière question.
Comment l'informatique quantique changera-t-elle notre vie ?
Si nos ordinateurs et nos téléphones ne seront pas quantiques dans un futur proche,
quel peut être l'impact de la révolution quantique pour nous, le monde des mortels ?
Richard Freyman a jadis expliqué qu'on ne peut pas vraiment modéliser un univers quantique sur une machine quantique,
et cette idée a de grandes conséquences.
Certains optimistes pensent que l'informatique quantique révolutionnera tout : ingénieurie, médecine...
Ils pensent que, dans le domaine de la chimie, nous pourrions créer des modélisations plus exactes
des molécules et du niveau quantique, et donc que nous pourrions mieux simuler comment la chimie interragit avec le corps humain.
Nous pourrions mieux comprendre pourquoi certains médicaments agissent si bien à un niveau micro.
Nous pourrions mieux comprendre la neurochimie

English: 
And so here we are at the end with one last question.
How will quantum computing change our lives?
if our desktops and our phones are not going to be quantum machines any time soon
what will the quantum revolution mean to us?
Richard Feynman once said you can't truly model a quantum universe on a non quantum machine
and the ramifications of that are profound.
Optimists posit that quantum computing will revolutionize everything from engineering to medicine,
consider the field of chemistry if we could model things more accurately at the
molecular and quantum level we could better simulate how chemicals interact with the human body.
We could better understand how the medicines we take get distributed at the lowest level.
We could remove the veil from neurochemical

Korean: 
자, 이제 마지막 질문을 드려볼 때가 됐군요.
양자 컴퓨팅은 우리 삶을 어떻게 바꿔놓을까요?
가까운 미래에 노트북이나 스마트폰들에 양자 컴퓨팅이 적용되는 것은 아니더라도,
양자 컴퓨팅 혁명이 우리에게는 어떤 의미가 있을까요?
♪ Birth of the People ♪
리처드 파인만(Richard Feynman)이 말하기를, 비-양자 기기를 갖고는 양자 세계를 모델링할 수 없으며,
그 중대한 파급효과들 역시도 모델링할 수 없다고 했죠.
낙관론자들은 양자 컴퓨팅이 엔지니어링과 의학 분야에 혁명적인 결과를 가져올 거라고 보지요.
화학 분야를 예를 들어봅시다.
물체를 분자 단위와 양자 단위까지 정확하게 모델링할 수 있다면,
화학물질이 인체와 어떻게 상호작용하는지를 더 잘 시뮬레이션할 수 있죠.
의약품이 인체의 좀 더 심층적인 레벨에서 어떻게 퍼져나가는지도 더 잘 이해할 수 있게되죠.
신경화학 분야의 상호작용에 대한 베일을 벗겨내고,

French: 
et ses interactions, et donc mieux comprendre la complexe chimie de notre cerveau.
Ou nous pourrions combiner l'informatique quantique avec l'étude des sciences de la terre et de l'agronomie.
Plus de 1% de l'énergie mondiale est utilisée pour la fertilisation des terres, chaque année,
et la raison est un processus incroyablement complexe
et inefficace qui n'a que peu évolué durant les dernières centaines d'année.
Mais, grâce à l'informatique quantique, nous pourrions optimiser ce processus et sauver au monde
des millions de tonnes de gaz naturel chaque année. Aussi, puisqu'on parle d'environnement,
nous n'avons pas aujourd'hui une vraie méthode pour limiter le niveau de CO2 dans l'air.
Pour le moment, la seule chose qu'on fait pour capturer le CO2 est en fait
ajouter de lourds systèmes mécaniques aux usines elles-mêmes.
Mais si nous pouvions faire de la chimie quantique, alors nous pourrions agir sur l'environnement

English: 
interactions and come to a better grasp on how the complex chemistry of the brain really works.
Or we could combine quantum computing with earth sciences and agronomy,
over 1% of the world's total energy is used just to produce fertilizer every year,
this is because most of it is made through a complex and
inefficient process that we haven't really been able to improve on in the last hundred years.
But with quantum computing we might be able to find a much more efficient catalyst and save the world
literally millions of tons of natural gas every year and along those lines if we want to talk about the environment,
right now we don't have a really good catalyst for simply capturing carbon out of the air.
When people talk about carbon capture and using it to lower the amounts of CO2 in our atmosphere right now
they're basically only talking about doing it with bulky systems at power plants themselves,
if we could use quantum chemistry and quantum computing to help find a way to do this in the ambient environment

Korean: 
복잡한 화학작용의 실체에 접근해서 뇌가 어떻게 작용하는지를 파악할 수도 있습니다.
또는 양자 컴퓨팅을 지구과학이나 농업경제학과 결합시킬 수도 있죠.
매년 전 세계의 총 에너지의 1%가 넘는 양이 비료를 생산하기 위해 쓰이고 있는데요,
이는 비료의 대부분이, 복잡하고 비효율적인 과정을 통해 만들어지기 때문이고,
이 과정에 대한 진정한 진보가 지난 100년 동안 이뤄지지 못했기 때문입니다.
하지만 양자 컴퓨팅이라면 훨씬 효율적인 촉매를 찾아내서,
매년 써야 하는, 말 그대로 수백만 톤의 천연가스를 아끼고 지구를 살릴 수도 있죠.
그리고 내친 김에 더 나아가서, 환경 분야를 짚어보자면,
현재 우리는 공기 중 탄소를 포집할 만한 진정한 최적의 촉매를 확보하지 못했습니다.
탄소 배출 줄이기와, 현 대기중 CO2 농도를 낮추자고 하는 이야기는
사실상 발전소들의 거대한 규모를 줄이자는 이야기나 마찬가지이지만요,
만약 양자 화학이나 양자 컴퓨팅을 활용해서 우리 주변의 환경에 도움을 주는 방법을 찾아낸다면,

English: 
interactions and come to a better grasp on how the complex chemistry of the brain really works.
Or we could combine quantum computing with earth sciences and agronomy,
over 1% of the world's total energy is used just to produce fertilizer every year,
this is because most of it is made through a complex and
inefficient process that we haven't really been able to improve on in the last hundred years.
But with quantum computing we might be able to find a much more efficient catalyst and save the world
literally millions of tons of natural gas every year and along those lines if we want to talk about the environment,
right now we don't have a really good catalyst for simply capturing carbon out of the air.
When people talk about carbon capture and using it to lower the amounts of CO2 in our atmosphere right now
they're basically only talking about doing it with bulky systems at power plants themselves,
if we could use quantum chemistry and quantum computing to help find a way to do this in the ambient environment

Korean: 
늘어나는 CO2의 환경 위기를 해결하기 위한 커다란 진보가 이뤄질 수 있는 것이지요.
또, 소재 공학 영역을 살펴보면
20세기의 가장 거대한 퀘스트 중 하나는
초전도체를 만들어내는 것인데요,
초전도작용을 하기 위해서 극한의 영하의 온도가 갖춰져야만 할 필요가 없는 초전도체 말이죠.
이게 가능하려면, 양자 레벨에서 소재를 다뤄야 할 것이고,
이런 작업에는 양자 컴퓨터 같은 것들이 오늘날의 기기들보다 훨씬 적합할 것입니다.
양자컴퓨터가 실력 발휘를 할, 좀 더 피부에 와닿는 현실적인 것들로는,
머신 러닝이나 데이터 처리같은 영역이 있겠습니다.
많은 분들이 아마 MARI/O를 들어보셨을 텐데요,
이는 슈퍼 마리오 게임을 하는 걸 컴퓨터가 배우려는 시도입니다.
이는 슈퍼마리오 게임을 하는걸 컴퓨터가 배우려는 시도입니다.
간단히 말하자면, 게임을 할 때마다 점점 더 잘하는 법을 학습하면서 스스로 게임하는 컴퓨터입니다.
이 녀석은 매 게임마다 조작키를 눌러보면서 어떻게 하는 게 더 좋은지를 학습하지요.
안 좋았던 시도들은 폐기되고, 훨씬 성공적인 조작키 조작은 다음 시도를 위해 저장되면서,

French: 
et non plus sur les intermédiaires, et peut-être régler la crise de la pollution.
L'une des grande quêtes du 21e sicèle est aussi la création d'un superconducteur
qui pourra exister en-dehors de températures sous le zéro pour opérer. Si c'est possible,
alors nous pourrons étudier bien davantage de niveaux quantiques,
quelque chose que nos ordinateurs quantiques actuels font mal.
Mais, de manière plus concrète, c'est vraiment dans le domaine du machine learning et de la donnée
que des ordinateurs comme MARI/O peuvent aider.
MARI/O avait pour objet d'avoir un ordinateur
qui apprendrait à jouer à Super Mario World
simplement en lui indiquant que, plus il allait à droite, plus il s'améliorerait. C'est tout.
À chaque fois, il essaierait d'appuyer sur les boutons et calculerait la distance parcourue.
Les tentatives les moins réussies étaient oubliées, tandis que les réussites étaient intégrées dans le prochain essai.

English: 
it would be a major step forward towards solving our CO2 build-up crisis.
Or in the material sciences realm one of the greatest quests of the 21st century is to create a superconductor
that doesn't require serious sub-zero temperatures to action superconduct. If this is possible,
it will require an exploration of materials at the quantum level,
something quantum computers will be far more suited to handle than today's machines.
Now more immediate realistic things that quantum computers will provide us our advances in areas like machine learning and data handling.
Many of you have probably heard of MARI/O,
it was an attempt to have a computer
learn how to play Super Mario World
simply by telling it that the further right it got the better it was doing and then just leaving it alone and letting it play
Each time through it would just press some buttons and see how far to the right it got.
Less successful attempts were discarded and more successful button presses were integrated into its next run,

English: 
it would be a major step forward towards solving our CO2 build-up crisis.
Or in the material sciences realm one of the greatest quests of the 21st century is to create a superconductor
that doesn't require serious sub-zero temperatures to action superconduct. If this is possible,
it will require an exploration of materials at the quantum level,
something quantum computers will be far more suited to handle than today's machines.
Now more immediate realistic things that quantum computers will provide us our advances in areas like machine learning and data handling.
Many of you have probably heard of MARI/O,
it was an attempt to have a computer
learn how to play Super Mario World
simply by telling it that the further right it got the better it was doing and then just leaving it alone and letting it play
Each time through it would just press some buttons and see how far to the right it got.
Less successful attempts were discarded and more successful button presses were integrated into its next run,

Korean: 
슈퍼 마리오 월드의 스테이지들을 깨는 법을 결국 학습하는 녀석입니다.
이 녀석이 사실상 머신 러닝이지만,
마리오의 첫 판을 수천 번 반복해서 플레이하는 녀석일 뿐이고,
대부분의 현대적인 컴퓨터들은 거대한 데이터를 받아먹는 녀석들일 뿐이라,
얘들이 무언가에 '성공'했다는 것은,
주어진 막대한 '성공 사례'라는 데이터를 통해 학습하고 이뤄내는 것이죠.
그리고 마침내 작업이 잘 풀리면, 컴퓨터는  미래에 성공을 예측하거나 담보해주는 알고리즘을 만들어냅니다.
도시 계획, 암의 전이 과정, 주식 시장의 움직임 등등....
이런 모든 것들에서 머신 러닝을 통해서 실마리를 찾아낼 수 있고,
따라서 거대한 교통정체를 피하면서 대도시를 계획하게 될 수 있을지도 모르고,
환자의 암세포가 어디로 전이될지를 좀 더 정확하게 예측할 수도 있을 것이며,
예측을 통해 주식시장의 떡락사태가 일어나는 걸 완화하는 데 도움이 될 수도 있죠.
실제로 데이터를 정렬하고 비교하고 분석 할 수 있다면,

French: 
Il finit par maitriser tous les niveaux de Super Mario World.
C'est du "Machine Learning" mais, plutôt que de refaire le premier niveau en boucle pour apprendre les bases
ou d'être "nourris" avec un nombre de données incalculables, le ordinateurs quantiques
apprennent à quoi ressemble une tentative réussie et essaient de la répliquer.
Et, si tout se passe bien, ils produisent leur propres algorithmes afin de les aider à prédire le % de succès futur.
Planification urbaine, probabilités de cancer, mouvements du marché boursier...
Tous ces défis peuvent s'appuyer sur le machine learning,
et peut-être même nous aider à construire des villes sans traffic,
ou prédire où exactement le cancer d'un patient va se répandre,
ou anticiper le crash d'un marché suffisamment en avance pour mitiger l'impact.
Tout ça par l'analyse de la donnée que nous avons déjà.

English: 
eventually it learned how to beat levels in Super Mario World
That basically is machine learning but instead of running the first level of Mario a ton of times,
most of the time modern computers are fed gigantic sets of data, told what
success looks like and then set about trying to learn from any of the success cases. They find within the realm of data they've been given
and eventually if all goes well, they produce algorithms. That should help us create or predict future success.
City planning, cancer metastasizing, movements of the stock market...
All of these are problems that we might be able to crack with machine learning,
and heck we might be able to build cities that avoid getting major traffic jams,
predict much more accurately when a patient's cancer is going to spread or
see a likely stock market crash far enough in advance to mitigate it, if we could really sort through,
compare and analyze the data we have.

English: 
eventually it learned how to beat levels in Super Mario World
That basically is machine learning but instead of running the first level of Mario a ton of times,
most of the time modern computers are fed gigantic sets of data, told what
success looks like and then set about trying to learn from any of the success cases. They find within the realm of data they've been given
and eventually if all goes well, they produce algorithms. That should help us create or predict future success.
City planning, cancer metastasizing, movements of the stock market...
All of these are problems that we might be able to crack with machine learning,
and heck we might be able to build cities that avoid getting major traffic jams,
predict much more accurately when a patient's cancer is going to spread or
see a likely stock market crash far enough in advance to mitigate it, if we could really sort through,
compare and analyze the data we have.

English: 
And quantum computers are far better at this than the binary computers we have today.
Sorry guys!
But quantum computing doesn't come without its dangers,
I mean just consider security encryption
Right now, most of our encryption from our email encryption to our private social media data to our Amazon shopping,
All of that security hinges on one straightforward idea,
they all depend on how difficult it is for modern computers to factor the product of two enormous prime numbers,
the staggering computational requirements of that task are what make modern encryption secure.
But quantum computing by its very nature makes that impossible problem: soluble.
Quantum algorithms ability to assess entire ranges of possibility at once rather than having to check each possible solution individually.
Changes everything and I'm not saying the unbreakable cryptography of today will become child's play
but it sure won't be impossible anymore.

Korean: 
양자 컴퓨터는 오늘날 그 어느 현역 이진법 컴퓨터보다도 훨씬 유용할 것입니다.
미안해 현역들아!
하지만 양자 컴퓨팅에는 만만찮은 위험성도 존재하죠.
보안과 암호화의 분야를 생각해보시길 바랍니다.
지금 현재, 이메일 암호화, SNS 데이터, 아마존 쇼핑에 이르기까지 암호화 프로그램의 대부분은
이들 모두의 보안의 관건은 단 하나의 아이디어에 달려있습니다.
바로, 현대 컴퓨터가 두 개의 소수의 곱을 모으는 것이 얼마나 어려운지에 달려있는 것으로,
여기에는 어마어마한 연산 작업이 요구되기 때문에 현대 암호프로그램이 안전하게 유지됩니다.
하지만 양자 컴퓨팅은 그 자체의 본질 때문에 이 불가능한 작업을 풀 수 있습니다.
광역 전체에 접근하는 가능성이라는 양자 컴퓨팅 알고리즘은
섹터 하나하나마다 일일이 체크해야 하는 고전 컴퓨팅의 프로세스와 대비되고,
모든 것이 달라지게 됩니다.
저는 오늘날의 깨지지 않는 암호화가 애들 장난처럼 다뤄질 거라고 말씀드리는 게 아니에요.
더이상 철통 보안은 없다고 말씀드리고 있는 거죠.

English: 
And quantum computers are far better at this than the binary computers we have today.
Sorry guys!
But quantum computing doesn't come without its dangers,
I mean just consider security encryption
Right now, most of our encryption from our email encryption to our private social media data to our Amazon shopping,
All of that security hinges on one straightforward idea,
they all depend on how difficult it is for modern computers to factor the product of two enormous prime numbers,
the staggering computational requirements of that task are what make modern encryption secure.
But quantum computing by its very nature makes that impossible problem: soluble.
Quantum algorithms ability to assess entire ranges of possibility at once rather than having to check each possible solution individually.
Changes everything and I'm not saying the unbreakable cryptography of today will become child's play
but it sure won't be impossible anymore.

French: 
Et les ordinateurs quantiques sont déjà bien meilleurs à ça que nos ordianteurs de tous les jours.
Désolé, les gars !
Mais l'informatique quantique présente des dangers.
Par exemple, le cryptage de sécurité.
Aujourd'hui, l'encryptage de nos emails, de nos réseaux sociaux ou de nos comptes Amazon
reposent sur une seule et même idée :
la sécurité dépend de la difficulté qu'on les ordinateurs d'aujourd'hui à factoriser le produit de longs nombres premiers.
C'est ce simple fait qui assure la sécurité de nos mesures de cryptage actuelles.
Mais, par essence, l'informatique quantique rend ce défi... facile à résoudre.
Les algorithmes quantiques analysent tous les possibles d'une traite, plutôt que d'essayer chaque combinaison une à une.
Et ça, ça change beaucoup de choses.
Et un jour, ce ne sera plus impossible à décrypter.

English: 
Modern encryption won't truly be secure once quantum computing becomes a reality
which will expose our data to a whole new wave of security threats.
Allowing governments to spy more efficiently not only on each other, but on us.
And forcing us to rework how we do some of today's most routine internet-based tasks
Of course, at the same time it also opens up new possibilities
for improving encryption creating a whole new field of quantum cryptography.
Which could potentially allow for new approaches and enable brilliant minds to fundamentally change how we think about security in the modern age.
Quantum computing also presents a massive threat to cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin,
most of today's crypto currencies depend on a security protocol that could easily be overcome by quantum machines.
And even if quantum computers weren't used to actually overcome the systems that keep cryptocurrency secure,

French: 
L'encryptage moderne ne sera plus vraiment sécurisé une fois que l'ordinateur quantique devient une réalité,
ce qui exposera toutes nos données à une nouvelle vague de menaces.
Les gouvernements seront capables de s'espionner les uns les autres, mais aussi leurs citoyens.
Ce changement nous forcera à repenser la plupart de nos routines internet.
Bien sûr, en même temps, cela ouvre de nouvelles possibilités qui permettront
d'améliorer l'encryptage en créant une toute nouvelle manière de faire de la cryptographie quantique.
La sécurité sera sans doute repensée en son entier.
L'informatique quantique présente aussi d'incroyables risques pour les monnaies virtuelles,
car la plupart reposent aujourd'hui sur des protocoles de sécurité faciles d'accès pour les ordinateurs quantiques.
Et même si le quantique n'était pas utilisé pour mettre à terre les mécanismes de sécurité de ces monnaies,

English: 
Modern encryption won't truly be secure once quantum computing becomes a reality
which will expose our data to a whole new wave of security threats.
Allowing governments to spy more efficiently not only on each other, but on us.
And forcing us to rework how we do some of today's most routine internet-based tasks
Of course, at the same time it also opens up new possibilities
for improving encryption creating a whole new field of quantum cryptography.
Which could potentially allow for new approaches and enable brilliant minds to fundamentally change how we think about security in the modern age.
Quantum computing also presents a massive threat to cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin,
most of today's crypto currencies depend on a security protocol that could easily be overcome by quantum machines.
And even if quantum computers weren't used to actually overcome the systems that keep cryptocurrency secure,

Korean: 
현대 암호화 기술은 양자 컴퓨팅이 현실이 되는 순간 안전해지지 못하게 될 것이고,
보안을 위협하는 새로운 거대한 물결 앞에 우리의 데이터가 노출될 것입니다.
그렇게 되면 각국끼리의 첩보 활동 뿐만 아니라 정부의 시민 감시도 훨씬 효율적으로 일어나겠죠.
또한 오늘날 대부분의 고정적인 인터넷 기반 작업의 방식 역시도 판을 다시 짜야만 할겁니다.
물론, 그와 동시에
암호화 기술이 한층 향상되는 새로운 가능성 역시도 열리는거죠.
양자 암호화 기술이라는 새로운 분야가 태어나지 않을까요?
양자 암호화를 위해 천재들이 새로운 접근을 통해서
현대 시대의 보안에 대한 패러다임을 근본적으로 바꿔버릴 수도 있는 것이죠.
양자 컴퓨팅은 또한 비트코인같은 암호화폐들에 대한 거대한 위협이 될 수도 있죠.
오늘날의 암호화폐들 대부분은 양자 컴퓨팅에 의해 쉽게 파훼될 수준의 암호 프로토콜에 의존하고 있으니까요.
그리고, 암호화폐의 안전을 파훼해버리는 데 양자 컴퓨팅을 활용하지 않더라도,

English: 
they could be used to mine cryptocurrency far faster than the fastest computers set to the task today
potentially flooding the market and dramatically tanking the currency's value.
So thanks to those theories that Einstein and Bohr debated not a hundred years ago
We will soon have safer and faster air travel with routes built to make it easier for humanity to connect across the globe,
we'll be able to detect cancer sooner through machine learning
And solve even more complex problems of protein folding and DNA interactions to create yet more effective drugs.
We'll be able to better forecast the weather preventing deaths from flash floods and freak storms,
and we will be able to better anticipate market crashes and potentially prevent the loss of hundred of thousands of jobs
We will even be able to better understand the stars
as quantum machines help us sort through the enormous pile of data our modern telescopes provide.
Yet at the same time the quantum revolution may fatally wound our nascent cryptocurrencies.

French: 
elles pourrait être utilisée pour miner ces monnaies beaucoup plus vite qu'on ne le fait aujourd'hui.
Le marché pourrait alors s'évaporer sous l'avalanche présentée par l'offre.
C'est donc grâce au théories débattues par Einstein et Bohr il y a des dizaines d'années,
que nous aurons bientôt de nouveaux trajets aériens qui permettront de traverser les continents plus vite,
que nous pourrons détecter les cancers plus tôt avec le machine learning,
et résoudre des problèmes ADN bien plus complexes et créer des médicaments révolutionnaires.
Nous serons capables de prédire la météo et prévenir les morts dus aux inondations ou tempêtes,
et nous pourrons prévenir des crashs boursiers et sauver des centaines de milliers d'emplois.
Nous serons même capables de comprendre les étoiles
car les machines quantiques nous aideront à analyser l'incroyable masse de données fournies par les télescopes modernes.
Mais la révolution quantique pourrait détruire le marché nouveau des monnaies virtuelles

Korean: 
양자 컴퓨터는 오늘날 채굴에 이용되는 그 어떤 컴퓨터보다도 더 빠르게 암호화폐를 채굴할 수 있고,
암호화폐가 시장에 범람하면서 극적으로 화폐 가치를 보전할 잠재성도 있습니다.
따라서 아인슈타인과 보어가 100년도 채 되지 않은 과거에 벌인 논쟁 덕분에,
전 세계를 보다 쉽게 ​​연결할 수 있도록 만들어진 노선을 통해, 더 안전하고 빠른 항공 여행을 곧 누리게 될 것이고,
머신 러닝을 통해 더욱 조기에 암을 발견할 수 있게 되고,
단백질 폴딩과 DNA 상호작용같은 복잡한 문제들을 해결하고 훨씬 효과적인 의약품을 개발할 수 있을 것입니다.
더욱 향상된 일기예보를 통해 홍수와 폭풍우로 인한 사망을 예방할 수 있을 것이고,
경기나 주가의 흐름을 훨씬 잘 예측하게 되면서
수백, 수천 가지의 일자리들을 잃는 것을 잠재적으로 예방하게 될 것입니다.
심지어 양자 컴퓨터를 통해 별에 대해서도 훨씬 많은 것을 알게 될 겁니다.
현대 망원경이 제공하는 거대한 빅데이터를 분류하는 데 도움을 주면서 말입니다.
하지만 동시에 양자 컴퓨팅 혁명은 초기형 암호화폐에 심각한 치명상을 입힐 수도 있고,

English: 
they could be used to mine cryptocurrency far faster than the fastest computers set to the task today
potentially flooding the market and dramatically tanking the currency's value.
So thanks to those theories that Einstein and Bohr debated not a hundred years ago
We will soon have safer and faster air travel with routes built to make it easier for humanity to connect across the globe,
we'll be able to detect cancer sooner through machine learning
And solve even more complex problems of protein folding and DNA interactions to create yet more effective drugs.
We'll be able to better forecast the weather preventing deaths from flash floods and freak storms,
and we will be able to better anticipate market crashes and potentially prevent the loss of hundred of thousands of jobs
We will even be able to better understand the stars
as quantum machines help us sort through the enormous pile of data our modern telescopes provide.
Yet at the same time the quantum revolution may fatally wound our nascent cryptocurrencies.

English: 
And create a new battleground for cybersecurity
potentially putting everything for a military hardware to eBay purchases at risk.
But all of these ideas are in their infancy.
Right now, in Universities and laboratories across the globe
people are building the algorithms that will make these things possible.
Because to take advantage of the potential of quantum computing
we have to think with quantum mechanics, we have to build whole new
algorithms to tease out answers from the quantum superpositions or the space of possibility of our qubits.
And even for problems we've already addressed through traditional means
we will have to find new ways to address them ways that involve
realigning our thinking and approaching computer science in a way that most engineers out there
haven't even begun thinking in.
So will quantum computing revolutionize the world?
Maybe. That's largely on us. Can we learn to think in this way
That was once so disturbing, so counterintuitive even to Einstein?

English: 
And create a new battleground for cybersecurity
potentially putting everything for a military hardware to eBay purchases at risk.
But all of these ideas are in their infancy.
Right now, in Universities and laboratories across the globe
people are building the algorithms that will make these things possible.
Because to take advantage of the potential of quantum computing
we have to think with quantum mechanics, we have to build whole new
algorithms to tease out answers from the quantum superpositions or the space of possibility of our qubits.
And even for problems we've already addressed through traditional means
we will have to find new ways to address them ways that involve
realigning our thinking and approaching computer science in a way that most engineers out there
haven't even begun thinking in.
So will quantum computing revolutionize the world?
Maybe. That's largely on us. Can we learn to think in this way
That was once so disturbing, so counterintuitive even to Einstein?

French: 
et créer un nouveau champ de bataille pour la cybersécurité,
mettant à risque vos achats eBay mais aussi l'équipement militaire moderne.
Mais rien de tout ça n'existe encore.
Aujourd'hui, dans les universités et laboratoires du modne entier,
des gens créent des algorithmes qui rendront ces spéculations possibles.
Car, pour utiliser le potentiel de l'informatique quantique,
nous devons maîtriser les mécaniques quantiques et d'abord créer de nouveaux
algorithmes capables d'interpréter les réponses provenant de superpositions quantiques ou de l'espace des possibilités des qubits.
Et, même pour les problèmes auxquels nous avons déjà les réponses,
nous devrons trouver de nouvelles manières de les adresser
d'une manière à laquelle les scientifiques de l'ère informatique classique
n'ont même pas encore envisagé.
Est-ce que l'informatique quantique révolutionnera le monde ?
Peut-être. Ça dépend beaucoup de nous. Pouvons-nous remettre en cause nos idées fixes,
d'une manière si nouvelle qu'elle paraissait contrintuitive pour Einstein lui-même ?

Korean: 
사이버 보안 시장에 새로운 전쟁터를 닦아 놓을 수도 있고,
군용 하드웨어 전체를 갖다가 잠재적으로 위험에 처한 eBay 구매에 투입할 수도 있습니다.
하지만, 이러한 생각들 모두가 걸음마 단계입니다.
지금 현재, 전 세계의 대학과 연구소에서
사람들은 상술한 것들을 가능케 만드는 알고리즘들을 구축하는 데 열중하고 있죠.
양자 컴퓨팅의 잠재력에서 한 발이라도 더 앞서나가려고요.
우리는 양자역학을 염두에 둬야 합니다.
완전히 새로운 알고리즘들을 구축해놔야 하죠. 양자 중첩에서 답을 찾기 위해,
또는 큐빗들의 "확률의 공간"에서 답을 찾기 위해서요.
그리고 우리가 이미 전통적인 방법을 통해 다루어 온 문제들조차도
이들에게 연루된 방식을 제시하는 새로운 방법을 찾아야 할 것입니다.
우리의 사고를 재조정하고 컴퓨터 공학에 접근하는 것은, 대부분의 엔지니어가 생각조차도 시작하지 않았습니다.
우리의 사고를 재조정하고 컴퓨터 공학에 접근하는 것은, 대부분의 엔지니어가 생각조차도 시작하지 않았습니다.
자, 양자 컴퓨팅이 세상에 혁명을 일으킬까요?
아마도요.
거의 대부분이 우리 손에 달려있죠.
이런 사고방식을 배울 수 있을까요? 한 때 너무 불안해해서 아인슈타인조차도 헤맸던 이 문제를?

English: 
Can we make the theoretical a reality and then build off that reality?
Can we work with abstractions
so complex that even the greatest minds couldn't agree on what exactly they meant?
And if we can do all that can we do it in a way that's positive for Humanity?
Can we do it in a way that doesn't simply enable governments to more closely monitor us?
Or allow advertisers to better target us with their ads?
I don't know.
All I can say after having wrestled with this for so many weeks. Is that the potential is there,
And that makes this a very exciting time,
because knowing the potential exists one simple question remains...
That's right Zoe.
Can we seize it?

English: 
Can we make the theoretical a reality and then build off that reality?
Can we work with abstractions
so complex that even the greatest minds couldn't agree on what exactly they meant?
And if we can do all that can we do it in a way that's positive for Humanity?
Can we do it in a way that doesn't simply enable governments to more closely monitor us?
Or allow advertisers to better target us with their ads?
I don't know.
All I can say after having wrestled with this for so many weeks. Is that the potential is there,
And that makes this a very exciting time,
because knowing the potential exists one simple question remains...
That's right Zoe.
Can we seize it?

Korean: 
이런 사고방식을 배울 수 있을까요? 한 때 너무 불안해해서 아인슈타인조차도 헤맸던 이 문제를?
우리는 이론을 통해 현실을 창조하고, 그 현실을 구축할 수 있을까요?
너무 복잡해서 희대의 천재들도 그 의미에 대해서 동의하지 않았던 추상개념들을 우리가 잘 다뤄낼 수 있을까요?
너무 복잡해서 희대의 천재들도 그 의미에 대해서 동의하지 않았던 추상개념들을 우리가 잘 다뤄낼 수 있을까요?
그리고 만일 우리가 해내더라도,
그것을 인류를 위해 긍정적인 방향으로 끌고 갈 수 있을까요?
고작 정부가 우리를 더 면밀히 감시하는 데에만 쓰이게 할 수 있을까요?
광고 배너들이 우리를 기가 막히게 잘 찾아내는 데에 쓰이게 만들까요?
모르겠네요.
지난 몇 주간 이 주제와 씨름한 결과 제가 할 수 있는 말이라고는,
"잠재성이 분명 존재하기에,
진정 흥미로운 시간"이었다는 점입니다.
잠재성이 존재한다는 것을 알게 되면, 단순한 의문이 남게 마련이니까요...
*냐옹*
맞아, 조이.
"실현할 수 있을까요?"
♪   ♪

French: 
Pouvons-nous transformer la théorie d'une réalité et construire une réalité ?
Pouvons-nous travailler avec un abstrait
si complexe que même les plus grandes esprits n'ont pas su se mettre d'accord sur ce qu'il signifie ?
Et si nous y parvenons, saurons-nous transformer ce résultat en quelque chose de positif pour l'Humanité ?
Pouvons-nous le faire d'une manière qui ne permettra pas aux gouvernement de nous espionner ?
Sans permettre aux publicistes et réseaux sociaux de mieux cibles leurs consommateurs ?
Aucune idée.
Tout ce que je peux dire, c'est qu'après avoir réfléchi à ça toutes ces semaines...
Le potentiel est là, et c'est excitant
car une grande question subsiste :
Oui, Zoé, tu as deviné.
Que ferons-nous de demain ?
