- [Voiceover] I want to talk about how to
avoid
some common mistakes when you're writing
a historical paper.
This could apply to a term
paper, to a blue book essay,
even really to your Master's thesis if you
wanted to.
I want to talk about three phrases
that you might be tempted
to use in a historical essay
that actually muddy what you're trying to
say
and undercut your point
more than it helps.
So, these three phrases that
I want to talk about are:
"Throughout history,"
"It was inevitable,"
and "And that's why
[insert country here]
is so great today."
So, why are these phrases so problematic?
Let's start with "Throughout history."
So, this is something that you frequently
see in writing,
from historical essays
to pieces of journalism
and it often has the ring
of making something seem
really strong and adding the
weight of eons of history
behind a single sentence.
History is a very long thing.
I mean, for recorded
history we're going back
maybe five thousand, seven thousand years.
And think about the
many different cultures
and types of people and ideas that existed
throughout that time period.
If you're sitting down to write
an essay about, let's say,
The Cold War, and you
start: "Throughout history
people have feared nuclear attack,"
well, the first thing your reader is going
to think is:
"Wait! The nuclear bomb
was only developed in 1945.
I mean, that's not throughout history,
that's only throughout
the last seventy years."
Or what about: "Throughout
history people have gone
to war over religion."
Your reader might think:
"Well, what about when people
didn't live close enough to each other to
go to war
about different beliefs?"
And do we really want to send the message
that having different religions mean that
you necessarily
have to go to war?
One thing that "Throughout
history" does is
it makes an assumption
about human nature, right?,
that the way that people think now is the
way that people
have always thought throughout history,
or the way that people behave
now is the way that people
have always behaved throughout history.
And if there's anything that is one of the
core beliefs
of the study of history is that people are
different
over time.
It's fun to study the past because people
in the past
weren't like us.
They had different
ideas, different beliefs,
different cultural values.
And so, if you want to be really strong
about how you start a historical essay,
always start it in a really specific part
of time that you're talking about.
So, if you're talking about
the period from 1945 to 1965,
say "In the post-war era"
or "In the late 19th century."
And you might also add
"In the United States."
Right?
This shows that you have a
strong grasp of both the time
and the place that you're writing about.
And so, you can make an
argument that is specific
to that time period.
Okay, let's move on to
"It was inevitable."
I think we like to use the word inevitable
because it's long
and it sounds pretty cool.
But think about what
inevitable really means.
It means "It was unavoidable,"
there was no other thing
that could have happened.
Now think of a version of
history where everything
is inevitable.
Everything was just
going to happen no matter
whether anyone did anything or not.
That shows an interpretation
of history that says
that people's choices don't matter.
And if you want to emphasize
anything in history,
it's how much choices matter.
There are very few things that
are inevitable in history.
Most of them, I would say,
are natural disasters, right?
There is going to eventually
be an earthquake in California
is inevitable because
there's a fault line.
That's something that
humans can't control,
But for almost everything else in history,
humans can control it.
And they do decide how to
react to certain situations.
For example, take the
sinking of the USS Maine
in Havana Harbor, right?
This is the event that leads to the United
States going
to war with Spain over Cuba in 1898.
And the reason that this happened was
because the USS Maine
exploded in Havana Harbor.
Now, we know and the Spanish
suggested at the time
that the reason that the
USS Maine exploded was due
to a spontaneous combustion on-board.
There was an equipment malfunction.
The United States chose to
believe that this ship sinking
was the result of a Spanish
bomb and declared war.
Now, you might have said:
"War was inevitable."
But it really wasn't.
There were many ways
that the United States
could have chosen differently
in that moment, to say:
"Maybe we will believe the
Spanish and just leave it alone"
or "Maybe we'll send some
financial aid to Cuba
but we don't have to go to war."
When you get rid of inevitability
in history, you open up
new choices, new ways that
things could have gone.
And that is really the heart of
history, it's the possibility for
things to be different than they were
and different than they are.
Okay, let's finish up with "And that's why
[insert country here] is so great today."
You see this all the time
in historical papers.
And I think writers are
very tempted to finish
a historical essay with some
expression of patriotism.
And maybe in a few rare
cases this is true.
You could say: "The United
States is a better place today
than it was in the 1950s
thanks to the Civil Rights Act
of 1964."
But it's something you
want to use very sparingly,
because usually the scope of a historical
paper - and think
about our "Throughout
history" here - isn't so huge
as to merit the reaction to it being
"This is the heart of what
makes America great today."
I've read historical papers
about the Spanish Flu in 1919
that end with "And that's
why America is great today."
Ask yourself: is this relevant?
And even if it is, is it the most relevant
way
that you could end an essay?
For a historical essay you
want to keep your conclusions
very specific, the same
way that you want to keep
your period of time specific.
So, if you're talking about
the post-war era, conclude
with something that you
can actually substantiate,
that you have substantiated in your essay,
about the post-war era,
say, "The wealth generated
by industrialization after
World War II was the reason
that the Baby Boom happened."
Don't say "And that's why
America is great today."
What do you mean by great?
Do you mean economically great?
Culturally Great?
Politically great?
It's a little too vague, and vagueness can
really undermine
your argument as opposed to supporting it.
In a way these are all kind of appeals for
human nature,
appeals for the natural
progress of history,
and appeals to patriotism
that are less rooted
in the fact of what you want
to say than they are rooted
in ways of trying to get
your reader sympathy.
Instead what you can do is be specific in
your time
and your place.
Emphasize choices and points where things
might have gone differently than they did.
And end with a conclusion
that is very related
to the things that you
specifically addressed.
Remember, you never want to
introduce new information
in your conclusion, and
saying "And that's why America
is great today" is new information,
because it might not
necessarily be related.
Instead think about what it
was you proved in this paper
and key your conclusion directly to that.
