Welcome to Space News from
the Electric Universe,
brought to you by The
Thunderbolts Project™
at Thunderbolts.info
The most luminous
electromagnetic event
known to occur in the heavens,
is the gamma-ray burst.
For many years, scientists have
claimed that most gamma-ray bursts
occur when stars run
out of nuclear fuel,
then collapse to form a black hole,
neutron star or a quark star.
However, a recently detected gamma-ray
burst has left astronomers openly baffled.
Most gamma-ray bursts are thought to be
seen in the so-called "early universe"
and even those of a long duration
are believed to only last
from a few seconds
to a few minutes.
However, astronomers were astonished to
discover that the gamma-ray burst 130427A
lasted for an
unprecedented 20 hours
at a distance of just 3.8
billion light-years from Earth.
Astrophysicist Charles
Dermer states:
"Some of our theories are
just going down the drain.
This is hard to explain
with our current models."
What does the Electric Universe tell us
about the nature of gamma-ray bursts?
It's not really surprising you know,
that this kind of thing is happening
because the theory of
how stars are formed,
what they are composed of and their
internal structure is over 100 years old.
And it hasn't been
seriously revised
because the basic ideas have
remained the same for a century.
The standard view of high-energy
radiation is based on either
the collapse of a massive star,
the subsequent explosion
and then the collision of
material from the exploding star
with stationary matter
surrounding the star.
None of these methods are what we
consider useful in engineering
or in medicine, for instance,
where, if we want to produce
high-energy radiation
for medical x-rays or
for industrial x-rays
we simply use an
electrical discharge
and that can be done very
easily and very controllably.
Astronomers have limited
themselves by assuming
that gravity is the only
force in action here,
either in the collapse of a
star or the subsequent explosion.
In fact, it's been admitted
just a few months earlier,
that how a star explodes
is not explained.
So what we have here is conjecture and
assumptions piled upon assumptions
and now it's all falling apart and it's
taken 46 years for this to happen.
It was Hannes Alfvén, the Nobel
Prize winner in plasma physics
and also the father
of Plasma Cosmology,
who pointed out decades ago that
astronomers were missing something basic
in the form of what he called double
layers, electrical double layers,
which are formed when an electric
current flows through a plasma.
He said that these double
layers should be classified as
interstellar objects and
intergalactic objects
because they radiate energy like a
star can and they radiate radio noise.
In other words, they are the
sources of high-energy radiation.
But since the astronomers have
ignored what Alfvén had to say,
when he pointed out that their
theories of plasma physics
and what's going on
in space is incorrect;
the theories that the astronomers have
restricted themselves to, are now struggling
and the anomalies are coming in.
While scientists have been unable
to simulate a supernova explosion
in a supercomputer using
the standard model,
the electrical interpretation of
supernovae might more easily explain
these intense electromagnetic
emissions in deep space.
When we talk about high-energy
explosions in space,
the most regular and spectacular ones
(are) of course, the supernova explosions.
And yet it has been admitted
that supernova explosions
cannot be explained
by current theory.
In the standard theory, the nuclear
reactions in the core fizzle out
once there is a preponderance
of heavy elements in the core
which are unable to be converted into
heavier elements and release energy.
At that point, it's assumed that
the shut-off is rather sudden
and then the outer regions of
the star which is supported by
the radiant energy from this nuclear
explosion going on in the center,
suddenly collapsed. And in the process
of collapse, there is a rebound
and thus a production of
vast amounts of neutrinos
which streak out from the center of
the star and are registered on Earth.
Particularly in this regard
were supernova 1987a
when the neutrinos are actually
registered from that supernova.
Now the whole theory is extremely
complex and it's based on ideas
which have never been proven,
particularly the idea that matter can
be compressed beyond all normal states
to become super dense.
And in fact, in a neutron star where the
atoms collapse themselves to form neutrons,
the electrons join with the protons in the
nucleus to form fewer neutron material.
Now there's no real evidence
that this can be done.
However, it's assumed simply on the basis
that some stars send out pulses of radiation
which are interpreted as the
end product of the supernova
and an object which is super dense
and rotates extremely rapidly
and sends out a lighthouse
beam of radiation to the Earth
which is picked up
as a pulse signal.
None of this has been
satisfactorily explained
and there is no experimental
evidence that this is the case.
However, the plasma cosmologists
have analyzed the radiation,
which is quite complex, from a supernova
and have been able to explain it
in terms of electrical engineering,
pulsed signals in transmission lines.
And they say that the signals
come from a normal star
where there are discharges
in the magnetosphere
which cause these ringing pulses
to be sent out from the star.
It has nothing to do with the lighthouse
or a spinning super condensed object.
I think the astrophysicists continually get
into trouble by postulating states of matter
and also the behavior of matter which
cannot be observed in the laboratory.
The standard model
of a gamma-ray burst
has all of the activity centered on
a star or the collapse of a star,
which means that whatever
happens happens very quickly
and the energy is released
normally within about 30 seconds.
However, the Electric
Universe model has the star
connected to a circuit which is gigantic
compared to the size of the star.
In fact, the star itself at the center
of the circuit, is like a speck of dust.
The circuits that feed a star can
be seen in planetary nebulae.
The star appears as a bright point
at the neck of the hourglass.
Now, when a discharge to a star
reaches a certain current density,
it is possible for that current to be
suddenly shut off as if a switch is thrown.
A good example of the sudden
closing or opening of a circuit
which carries a vast amount
of power, can be seen on Earth
where the high voltage transmission
lines reach a switch yard.
And when those switches are thrown, you can
see a discharge which lasts for seconds
and a lot of energy, a lot of radiant
energy is emitted in that process.
Now if you scale it up to a stellar size of
course, that discharge can last for hours.
In this case it may be that we were
peering down the barrel of the hourglass,
if you like.
And the switch was thrown somewhere
in the neck of that hourglass
and then the ripples continued
for 20 hours afterwards.
The fact that most gamma-ray bursts
appear to be of short duration,
maybe only 30 seconds or so,
may be due to the fact that we're looking
at the hourglass, if you like, side on.
It seems possible that looking
down the barrel of that hourglass,
the radiant energy from that
outburst would be concentrated
and pointed towards us over
an extended period of time.
The standard model of a gamma-ray
burst has no way of explaining
a 20-hour radiant output
from a collapsing star.
For continuous updates on Space
News from the Electric Universe,
stay tuned to
Thunderbolts.info
