OUR
OUR FACEBOOK
OUR FACEBOOK PAGE.
OUR FACEBOOK PAGE.
CHANGES
OUR FACEBOOK PAGE.
CHANGES TO
OUR FACEBOOK PAGE.
CHANGES TO THE
OUR FACEBOOK PAGE.
CHANGES TO THE FEDERAL
OUR FACEBOOK PAGE.
CHANGES TO THE FEDERAL FOOD
OUR FACEBOOK PAGE.
CHANGES TO THE FEDERAL FOOD
STAMP
OUR FACEBOOK PAGE.
CHANGES TO THE FEDERAL FOOD
STAMP PROGRAM
OUR FACEBOOK PAGE.
CHANGES TO THE FEDERAL FOOD
STAMP PROGRAM WILL
OUR FACEBOOK PAGE.
CHANGES TO THE FEDERAL FOOD
STAMP PROGRAM WILL CUT
OUR FACEBOOK PAGE.
CHANGES TO THE FEDERAL FOOD
STAMP PROGRAM WILL CUT BENEFITS
CHANGES TO THE FEDERAL FOOD
STAMP PROGRAM WILL CUT BENEFITS
CHANGES TO THE FEDERAL FOOD
STAMP PROGRAM WILL CUT BENEFITS
FOR
CHANGES TO THE FEDERAL FOOD
STAMP PROGRAM WILL CUT BENEFITS
FOR HUNDREDS
CHANGES TO THE FEDERAL FOOD
STAMP PROGRAM WILL CUT BENEFITS
FOR HUNDREDS OF
CHANGES TO THE FEDERAL FOOD
STAMP PROGRAM WILL CUT BENEFITS
FOR HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS
CHANGES TO THE FEDERAL FOOD
STAMP PROGRAM WILL CUT BENEFITS
FOR HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF
STAMP PROGRAM WILL CUT BENEFITS
FOR HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF
STAMP PROGRAM WILL CUT BENEFITS
FOR HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF
PEOPLE.
STAMP PROGRAM WILL CUT BENEFITS
FOR HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF
PEOPLE. WE
STAMP PROGRAM WILL CUT BENEFITS
FOR HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF
PEOPLE. WE EXPLAIN
STAMP PROGRAM WILL CUT BENEFITS
FOR HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF
PEOPLE. WE EXPLAIN WHY
STAMP PROGRAM WILL CUT BENEFITS
FOR HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF
PEOPLE. WE EXPLAIN WHY IN
STAMP PROGRAM WILL CUT BENEFITS
FOR HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF
PEOPLE. WE EXPLAIN WHY IN OUR
FOR HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF
PEOPLE. WE EXPLAIN WHY IN OUR
FOR HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF
PEOPLE. WE EXPLAIN WHY IN OUR
DIGITAL
FOR HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF
PEOPLE. WE EXPLAIN WHY IN OUR
DIGITAL DIVE.
PEOPLE. WE EXPLAIN WHY IN OUR
DIGITAL DIVE.
PEOPLE. WE EXPLAIN WHY IN OUR
DIGITAL DIVE.
YESTERDAY,
PEOPLE. WE EXPLAIN WHY IN OUR
DIGITAL DIVE.
YESTERDAY, THE
DIGITAL DIVE.
YESTERDAY, THE
DIGITAL DIVE.
YESTERDAY, THE
TRUMP
DIGITAL DIVE.
YESTERDAY, THE
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION
DIGITAL DIVE.
YESTERDAY, THE
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ANNOUNCED
YESTERDAY, THE
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ANNOUNCED
YESTERDAY, THE
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ANNOUNCED
CHANGES
YESTERDAY, THE
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ANNOUNCED
CHANGES TO
YESTERDAY, THE
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ANNOUNCED
CHANGES TO THE
YESTERDAY, THE
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ANNOUNCED
CHANGES TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ANNOUNCED
CHANGES TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ANNOUNCED
CHANGES TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL
NUTRITION
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ANNOUNCED
CHANGES TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL
NUTRITION ASSISTANCE
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ANNOUNCED
CHANGES TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL
NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM,
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ANNOUNCED
CHANGES TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL
NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, OR
CHANGES TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL
NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, OR
CHANGES TO THE SUPPLEMENTAL
NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, OR
SNAP.
NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, OR
SNAP.
NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, OR
SNAP.
THE
NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, OR
SNAP.
THE RULE
NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, OR
SNAP.
THE RULE CHANGE
NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, OR
SNAP.
THE RULE CHANGE WILL
NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, OR
SNAP.
THE RULE CHANGE WILL IMPACT
SNAP.
THE RULE CHANGE WILL IMPACT
SNAP.
THE RULE CHANGE WILL IMPACT
PEOPLE
SNAP.
THE RULE CHANGE WILL IMPACT
PEOPLE BETWEEN
SNAP.
THE RULE CHANGE WILL IMPACT
PEOPLE BETWEEN 18
SNAP.
THE RULE CHANGE WILL IMPACT
PEOPLE BETWEEN 18 AND
SNAP.
THE RULE CHANGE WILL IMPACT
PEOPLE BETWEEN 18 AND 49,
SNAP.
THE RULE CHANGE WILL IMPACT
PEOPLE BETWEEN 18 AND 49, WHO
THE RULE CHANGE WILL IMPACT
PEOPLE BETWEEN 18 AND 49, WHO
THE RULE CHANGE WILL IMPACT
PEOPLE BETWEEN 18 AND 49, WHO
DON'T
THE RULE CHANGE WILL IMPACT
PEOPLE BETWEEN 18 AND 49, WHO
DON'T HAVE
THE RULE CHANGE WILL IMPACT
PEOPLE BETWEEN 18 AND 49, WHO
DON'T HAVE KIDS
THE RULE CHANGE WILL IMPACT
PEOPLE BETWEEN 18 AND 49, WHO
DON'T HAVE KIDS AND
THE RULE CHANGE WILL IMPACT
PEOPLE BETWEEN 18 AND 49, WHO
DON'T HAVE KIDS AND AREN'T
PEOPLE BETWEEN 18 AND 49, WHO
DON'T HAVE KIDS AND AREN'T
PEOPLE BETWEEN 18 AND 49, WHO
DON'T HAVE KIDS AND AREN'T
DISABLED.
DON'T HAVE KIDS AND AREN'T
DISABLED.
DON'T HAVE KIDS AND AREN'T
DISABLED.
THEY'LL
DON'T HAVE KIDS AND AREN'T
DISABLED.
THEY'LL NOW
DON'T HAVE KIDS AND AREN'T
DISABLED.
THEY'LL NOW NEED
DON'T HAVE KIDS AND AREN'T
DISABLED.
THEY'LL NOW NEED TO
DON'T HAVE KIDS AND AREN'T
DISABLED.
THEY'LL NOW NEED TO WORK
DON'T HAVE KIDS AND AREN'T
DISABLED.
THEY'LL NOW NEED TO WORK AT
DISABLED.
THEY'LL NOW NEED TO WORK AT
DISABLED.
THEY'LL NOW NEED TO WORK AT
LEAST
DISABLED.
THEY'LL NOW NEED TO WORK AT
LEAST 20
DISABLED.
THEY'LL NOW NEED TO WORK AT
LEAST 20 HOURS
DISABLED.
THEY'LL NOW NEED TO WORK AT
LEAST 20 HOURS A
DISABLED.
THEY'LL NOW NEED TO WORK AT
LEAST 20 HOURS A WEEK
DISABLED.
THEY'LL NOW NEED TO WORK AT
LEAST 20 HOURS A WEEK TO
DISABLED.
THEY'LL NOW NEED TO WORK AT
LEAST 20 HOURS A WEEK TO GET
THEY'LL NOW NEED TO WORK AT
LEAST 20 HOURS A WEEK TO GET
THEY'LL NOW NEED TO WORK AT
LEAST 20 HOURS A WEEK TO GET
FOOD
THEY'LL NOW NEED TO WORK AT
LEAST 20 HOURS A WEEK TO GET
FOOD ASSISTANCE.
THEY'LL NOW NEED TO WORK AT
LEAST 20 HOURS A WEEK TO GET
FOOD ASSISTANCE. EACH
THEY'LL NOW NEED TO WORK AT
LEAST 20 HOURS A WEEK TO GET
FOOD ASSISTANCE. EACH STATE
THEY'LL NOW NEED TO WORK AT
LEAST 20 HOURS A WEEK TO GET
FOOD ASSISTANCE. EACH STATE USED
LEAST 20 HOURS A WEEK TO GET
FOOD ASSISTANCE. EACH STATE USED
LEAST 20 HOURS A WEEK TO GET
FOOD ASSISTANCE. EACH STATE USED
TO
LEAST 20 HOURS A WEEK TO GET
FOOD ASSISTANCE. EACH STATE USED
TO HAVE
LEAST 20 HOURS A WEEK TO GET
FOOD ASSISTANCE. EACH STATE USED
TO HAVE THE
LEAST 20 HOURS A WEEK TO GET
FOOD ASSISTANCE. EACH STATE USED
TO HAVE THE OPTION
LEAST 20 HOURS A WEEK TO GET
FOOD ASSISTANCE. EACH STATE USED
TO HAVE THE OPTION TO
LEAST 20 HOURS A WEEK TO GET
FOOD ASSISTANCE. EACH STATE USED
TO HAVE THE OPTION TO WAIVE
LEAST 20 HOURS A WEEK TO GET
FOOD ASSISTANCE. EACH STATE USED
TO HAVE THE OPTION TO WAIVE THAT
FOOD ASSISTANCE. EACH STATE USED
TO HAVE THE OPTION TO WAIVE THAT
FOOD ASSISTANCE. EACH STATE USED
TO HAVE THE OPTION TO WAIVE THAT
RULE
FOOD ASSISTANCE. EACH STATE USED
TO HAVE THE OPTION TO WAIVE THAT
RULE --
FOOD ASSISTANCE. EACH STATE USED
TO HAVE THE OPTION TO WAIVE THAT
RULE -- BUT
FOOD ASSISTANCE. EACH STATE USED
TO HAVE THE OPTION TO WAIVE THAT
RULE -- BUT NOT
FOOD ASSISTANCE. EACH STATE USED
TO HAVE THE OPTION TO WAIVE THAT
RULE -- BUT NOT ANYMORE.
TO HAVE THE OPTION TO WAIVE THAT
RULE -- BUT NOT ANYMORE.
TO HAVE THE OPTION TO WAIVE THAT
RULE -- BUT NOT ANYMORE.
HERE'S
TO HAVE THE OPTION TO WAIVE THAT
RULE -- BUT NOT ANYMORE.
HERE'S HOW
TO HAVE THE OPTION TO WAIVE THAT
RULE -- BUT NOT ANYMORE.
HERE'S HOW THE
RULE -- BUT NOT ANYMORE.
HERE'S HOW THE
RULE -- BUT NOT ANYMORE.
HERE'S HOW THE
NUMBERS
RULE -- BUT NOT ANYMORE.
HERE'S HOW THE
NUMBERS SHAKEOUT.
HERE'S HOW THE
NUMBERS SHAKEOUT.
NUMBERS SHAKEOUT.
36
36 MILLION
36 MILLION AMERICANS
36 MILLION AMERICANS RECIEVE
36 MILLION AMERICANS RECIEVE
SNAP
36 MILLION AMERICANS RECIEVE
SNAP BENEFITS
36 MILLION AMERICANS RECIEVE
SNAP BENEFITS --
36 MILLION AMERICANS RECIEVE
SNAP BENEFITS -- INCLUDING
36 MILLION AMERICANS RECIEVE
SNAP BENEFITS -- INCLUDING MORE
36 MILLION AMERICANS RECIEVE
SNAP BENEFITS -- INCLUDING MORE
THAN
36 MILLION AMERICANS RECIEVE
SNAP BENEFITS -- INCLUDING MORE
THAN 400-THOUSAND
36 MILLION AMERICANS RECIEVE
SNAP BENEFITS -- INCLUDING MORE
THAN 400-THOUSAND MINNESOTANS.
SNAP BENEFITS -- INCLUDING MORE
THAN 400-THOUSAND MINNESOTANS.
SNAP BENEFITS -- INCLUDING MORE
THAN 400-THOUSAND MINNESOTANS.
IT'S
SNAP BENEFITS -- INCLUDING MORE
THAN 400-THOUSAND MINNESOTANS.
IT'S ESTIMATED
SNAP BENEFITS -- INCLUDING MORE
THAN 400-THOUSAND MINNESOTANS.
IT'S ESTIMATED 688-
SNAP BENEFITS -- INCLUDING MORE
THAN 400-THOUSAND MINNESOTANS.
IT'S ESTIMATED 688- THOUSAND
THAN 400-THOUSAND MINNESOTANS.
IT'S ESTIMATED 688- THOUSAND
THAN 400-THOUSAND MINNESOTANS.
IT'S ESTIMATED 688- THOUSAND
PEOPLE
THAN 400-THOUSAND MINNESOTANS.
IT'S ESTIMATED 688- THOUSAND
PEOPLE NATIONWIDE
THAN 400-THOUSAND MINNESOTANS.
IT'S ESTIMATED 688- THOUSAND
PEOPLE NATIONWIDE WILL
THAN 400-THOUSAND MINNESOTANS.
IT'S ESTIMATED 688- THOUSAND
PEOPLE NATIONWIDE WILL LOSE
IT'S ESTIMATED 688- THOUSAND
PEOPLE NATIONWIDE WILL LOSE
IT'S ESTIMATED 688- THOUSAND
PEOPLE NATIONWIDE WILL LOSE
THOSE
IT'S ESTIMATED 688- THOUSAND
PEOPLE NATIONWIDE WILL LOSE
THOSE BENEFITS
IT'S ESTIMATED 688- THOUSAND
PEOPLE NATIONWIDE WILL LOSE
THOSE BENEFITS --
IT'S ESTIMATED 688- THOUSAND
PEOPLE NATIONWIDE WILL LOSE
THOSE BENEFITS -- SAVING
IT'S ESTIMATED 688- THOUSAND
PEOPLE NATIONWIDE WILL LOSE
THOSE BENEFITS -- SAVING THE
PEOPLE NATIONWIDE WILL LOSE
THOSE BENEFITS -- SAVING THE
THOSE BENEFITS -- SAVING THE
GOVERNMENT
GOVERNMENT 5-POINT-5
GOVERNMENT 5-POINT-5 BILLION
GOVERNMENT 5-POINT-5 BILLION
DOLLARS.
GOVERNMENT 5-POINT-5 BILLION
DOLLARS.
MINNESOTA
GOVERNMENT 5-POINT-5 BILLION
DOLLARS.
MINNESOTA SENATOR
GOVERNMENT 5-POINT-5 BILLION
DOLLARS.
MINNESOTA SENATOR AMY
GOVERNMENT 5-POINT-5 BILLION
DOLLARS.
MINNESOTA SENATOR AMY KLOBUCHAR
DOLLARS.
MINNESOTA SENATOR AMY KLOBUCHAR
DOLLARS.
MINNESOTA SENATOR AMY KLOBUCHAR
RESPONDED
DOLLARS.
MINNESOTA SENATOR AMY KLOBUCHAR
RESPONDED TO
DOLLARS.
MINNESOTA SENATOR AMY KLOBUCHAR
RESPONDED TO THE
DOLLARS.
MINNESOTA SENATOR AMY KLOBUCHAR
RESPONDED TO THE CHANGE,
MINNESOTA SENATOR AMY KLOBUCHAR
RESPONDED TO THE CHANGE,
MINNESOTA SENATOR AMY KLOBUCHAR
RESPONDED TO THE CHANGE,
TWEETING
MINNESOTA SENATOR AMY KLOBUCHAR
RESPONDED TO THE CHANGE,
TWEETING "THIS
MINNESOTA SENATOR AMY KLOBUCHAR
RESPONDED TO THE CHANGE,
TWEETING "THIS IS
MINNESOTA SENATOR AMY KLOBUCHAR
RESPONDED TO THE CHANGE,
TWEETING "THIS IS JUST
MINNESOTA SENATOR AMY KLOBUCHAR
RESPONDED TO THE CHANGE,
TWEETING "THIS IS JUST CRUEL."
RESPONDED TO THE CHANGE,
TWEETING "THIS IS JUST CRUEL."
RESPONDED TO THE CHANGE,
TWEETING "THIS IS JUST CRUEL."
HERE'S
RESPONDED TO THE CHANGE,
TWEETING "THIS IS JUST CRUEL."
HERE'S WHAT
RESPONDED TO THE CHANGE,
TWEETING "THIS IS JUST CRUEL."
HERE'S WHAT SOME
RESPONDED TO THE CHANGE,
TWEETING "THIS IS JUST CRUEL."
HERE'S WHAT SOME OF
RESPONDED TO THE CHANGE,
TWEETING "THIS IS JUST CRUEL."
HERE'S WHAT SOME OF OUR
TWEETING "THIS IS JUST CRUEL."
HERE'S WHAT SOME OF OUR
TWEETING "THIS IS JUST CRUEL."
HERE'S WHAT SOME OF OUR
FOLLOWERS
TWEETING "THIS IS JUST CRUEL."
HERE'S WHAT SOME OF OUR
FOLLOWERS HAD
TWEETING "THIS IS JUST CRUEL."
HERE'S WHAT SOME OF OUR
FOLLOWERS HAD TO
TWEETING "THIS IS JUST CRUEL."
HERE'S WHAT SOME OF OUR
FOLLOWERS HAD TO SAY.
HERE'S WHAT SOME OF OUR
FOLLOWERS HAD TO SAY.
FOLLOWERS HAD TO SAY.
FOLLOWERS HAD TO SAY.

KAREN
FOLLOWERS HAD TO SAY.

KAREN THINKS
FOLLOWERS HAD TO SAY.

KAREN THINKS "THIS
FOLLOWERS HAD TO SAY.

KAREN THINKS "THIS WILL
KAREN THINKS "THIS WILL
KAREN THINKS "THIS WILL
ENCOURAGE
KAREN THINKS "THIS WILL
ENCOURAGE ABLE-BODIED
KAREN THINKS "THIS WILL
ENCOURAGE ABLE-BODIED PEOPLE
KAREN THINKS "THIS WILL
ENCOURAGE ABLE-BODIED PEOPLE TO
KAREN THINKS "THIS WILL
ENCOURAGE ABLE-BODIED PEOPLE TO
WORK.
KAREN THINKS "THIS WILL
ENCOURAGE ABLE-BODIED PEOPLE TO
WORK. WORKING
KAREN THINKS "THIS WILL
ENCOURAGE ABLE-BODIED PEOPLE TO
WORK. WORKING AND
KAREN THINKS "THIS WILL
ENCOURAGE ABLE-BODIED PEOPLE TO
WORK. WORKING AND ADDING
KAREN THINKS "THIS WILL
ENCOURAGE ABLE-BODIED PEOPLE TO
WORK. WORKING AND ADDING VALUE
ENCOURAGE ABLE-BODIED PEOPLE TO
WORK. WORKING AND ADDING VALUE
ENCOURAGE ABLE-BODIED PEOPLE TO
WORK. WORKING AND ADDING VALUE
CREATES
ENCOURAGE ABLE-BODIED PEOPLE TO
WORK. WORKING AND ADDING VALUE
CREATES SELF-WORTH.
ENCOURAGE ABLE-BODIED PEOPLE TO
WORK. WORKING AND ADDING VALUE
CREATES SELF-WORTH. RATHER
ENCOURAGE ABLE-BODIED PEOPLE TO
WORK. WORKING AND ADDING VALUE
CREATES SELF-WORTH. RATHER THAN
WORK. WORKING AND ADDING VALUE
CREATES SELF-WORTH. RATHER THAN
CREATES SELF-WORTH. RATHER THAN
ENABLING
ENABLING WE
ENABLING WE NEED
ENABLING WE NEED TO
ENABLING WE NEED TO ENCOURAGE."
ENABLING WE NEED TO ENCOURAGE."
AMY
ENABLING WE NEED TO ENCOURAGE."
AMY SAID
ENABLING WE NEED TO ENCOURAGE."
AMY SAID "THESE
ENABLING WE NEED TO ENCOURAGE."
AMY SAID "THESE PROGRAMS
ENABLING WE NEED TO ENCOURAGE."
AMY SAID "THESE PROGRAMS WERE
ENABLING WE NEED TO ENCOURAGE."
AMY SAID "THESE PROGRAMS WERE
ALWAYS
ENABLING WE NEED TO ENCOURAGE."
AMY SAID "THESE PROGRAMS WERE
ALWAYS MEANT
ENABLING WE NEED TO ENCOURAGE."
AMY SAID "THESE PROGRAMS WERE
ALWAYS MEANT FOR
ENABLING WE NEED TO ENCOURAGE."
AMY SAID "THESE PROGRAMS WERE
ALWAYS MEANT FOR SHORT
ENABLING WE NEED TO ENCOURAGE."
AMY SAID "THESE PROGRAMS WERE
ALWAYS MEANT FOR SHORT TERM
AMY SAID "THESE PROGRAMS WERE
ALWAYS MEANT FOR SHORT TERM
ALWAYS MEANT FOR SHORT TERM
HARDSHIPS,
HARDSHIPS, NOT
HARDSHIPS, NOT LIFELONG
HARDSHIPS, NOT LIFELONG AND
HARDSHIPS, NOT LIFELONG AND
GENERATIONAL
HARDSHIPS, NOT LIFELONG AND
GENERATIONAL ONES.
HARDSHIPS, NOT LIFELONG AND
GENERATIONAL ONES. SOMETHING
HARDSHIPS, NOT LIFELONG AND
GENERATIONAL ONES. SOMETHING
BROKE
HARDSHIPS, NOT LIFELONG AND
GENERATIONAL ONES. SOMETHING
BROKE DOWN
HARDSHIPS, NOT LIFELONG AND
GENERATIONAL ONES. SOMETHING
BROKE DOWN ON
HARDSHIPS, NOT LIFELONG AND
GENERATIONAL ONES. SOMETHING
BROKE DOWN ON THE
HARDSHIPS, NOT LIFELONG AND
GENERATIONAL ONES. SOMETHING
BROKE DOWN ON THE ROAD
HARDSHIPS, NOT LIFELONG AND
GENERATIONAL ONES. SOMETHING
BROKE DOWN ON THE ROAD TO
GENERATIONAL ONES. SOMETHING
BROKE DOWN ON THE ROAD TO
GENERATIONAL ONES. SOMETHING
BROKE DOWN ON THE ROAD TO
INDEPENDENCE
GENERATIONAL ONES. SOMETHING
BROKE DOWN ON THE ROAD TO
INDEPENDENCE AND
GENERATIONAL ONES. SOMETHING
BROKE DOWN ON THE ROAD TO
INDEPENDENCE AND IT
GENERATIONAL ONES. SOMETHING
BROKE DOWN ON THE ROAD TO
INDEPENDENCE AND IT IS
GENERATIONAL ONES. SOMETHING
BROKE DOWN ON THE ROAD TO
INDEPENDENCE AND IT IS A
BROKE DOWN ON THE ROAD TO
INDEPENDENCE AND IT IS A
BROKE DOWN ON THE ROAD TO
INDEPENDENCE AND IT IS A
BIPARTISAN
BROKE DOWN ON THE ROAD TO
INDEPENDENCE AND IT IS A
BIPARTISAN PROBLEM."
INDEPENDENCE AND IT IS A
BIPARTISAN PROBLEM."
INDEPENDENCE AND IT IS A
BIPARTISAN PROBLEM."
AND
INDEPENDENCE AND IT IS A
BIPARTISAN PROBLEM."
AND AMBER
INDEPENDENCE AND IT IS A
BIPARTISAN PROBLEM."
AND AMBER SAID
INDEPENDENCE AND IT IS A
BIPARTISAN PROBLEM."
AND AMBER SAID "SO
INDEPENDENCE AND IT IS A
BIPARTISAN PROBLEM."
AND AMBER SAID "SO LESS
INDEPENDENCE AND IT IS A
BIPARTISAN PROBLEM."
AND AMBER SAID "SO LESS MONEY
BIPARTISAN PROBLEM."
AND AMBER SAID "SO LESS MONEY
BIPARTISAN PROBLEM."
AND AMBER SAID "SO LESS MONEY
BACK
BIPARTISAN PROBLEM."
AND AMBER SAID "SO LESS MONEY
BACK INTO
BIPARTISAN PROBLEM."
AND AMBER SAID "SO LESS MONEY
BACK INTO THE
BIPARTISAN PROBLEM."
AND AMBER SAID "SO LESS MONEY
BACK INTO THE ECONOMY
BIPARTISAN PROBLEM."
AND AMBER SAID "SO LESS MONEY
BACK INTO THE ECONOMY BECAUSE
AND AMBER SAID "SO LESS MONEY
BACK INTO THE ECONOMY BECAUSE
AND AMBER SAID "SO LESS MONEY
BACK INTO THE ECONOMY BECAUSE
PEOPLE
AND AMBER SAID "SO LESS MONEY
BACK INTO THE ECONOMY BECAUSE
PEOPLE WILL
AND AMBER SAID "SO LESS MONEY
BACK INTO THE ECONOMY BECAUSE
PEOPLE WILL SPEND
AND AMBER SAID "SO LESS MONEY
BACK INTO THE ECONOMY BECAUSE
PEOPLE WILL SPEND LESS
AND AMBER SAID "SO LESS MONEY
BACK INTO THE ECONOMY BECAUSE
PEOPLE WILL SPEND LESS MONEY
AND AMBER SAID "SO LESS MONEY
BACK INTO THE ECONOMY BECAUSE
PEOPLE WILL SPEND LESS MONEY AT
BACK INTO THE ECONOMY BECAUSE
PEOPLE WILL SPEND LESS MONEY AT
BACK INTO THE ECONOMY BECAUSE
PEOPLE WILL SPEND LESS MONEY AT
THE
BACK INTO THE ECONOMY BECAUSE
PEOPLE WILL SPEND LESS MONEY AT
THE GROCERY
BACK INTO THE ECONOMY BECAUSE
PEOPLE WILL SPEND LESS MONEY AT
THE GROCERY STORE."
BACK INTO THE ECONOMY BECAUSE
PEOPLE WILL SPEND LESS MONEY AT
THE GROCERY STORE." SHE
PEOPLE WILL SPEND LESS MONEY AT
THE GROCERY STORE." SHE
PEOPLE WILL SPEND LESS MONEY AT
THE GROCERY STORE." SHE
CONTINUES,
PEOPLE WILL SPEND LESS MONEY AT
THE GROCERY STORE." SHE
CONTINUES, "MORE
PEOPLE WILL SPEND LESS MONEY AT
THE GROCERY STORE." SHE
CONTINUES, "MORE DONATIONS
PEOPLE WILL SPEND LESS MONEY AT
THE GROCERY STORE." SHE
CONTINUES, "MORE DONATIONS WILL
THE GROCERY STORE." SHE
CONTINUES, "MORE DONATIONS WILL
CONTINUES, "MORE DONATIONS WILL
BE
BE NEEDED
BE NEEDED AT
BE NEEDED AT ALREADY
BE NEEDED AT ALREADY STRETCHED
BE NEEDED AT ALREADY STRETCHED
FOOD
BE NEEDED AT ALREADY STRETCHED
FOOD SHELVES.
BE NEEDED AT ALREADY STRETCHED
FOOD SHELVES. THAT
BE NEEDED AT ALREADY STRETCHED
FOOD SHELVES. THAT SAVINGS
BE NEEDED AT ALREADY STRETCHED
FOOD SHELVES. THAT SAVINGS IS
BE NEEDED AT ALREADY STRETCHED
FOOD SHELVES. THAT SAVINGS IS
NOTHING
BE NEEDED AT ALREADY STRETCHED
FOOD SHELVES. THAT SAVINGS IS
NOTHING COMPARED
BE NEEDED AT ALREADY STRETCHED
FOOD SHELVES. THAT SAVINGS IS
NOTHING COMPARED TO
BE NEEDED AT ALREADY STRETCHED
FOOD SHELVES. THAT SAVINGS IS
NOTHING COMPARED TO MAKING
BE NEEDED AT ALREADY STRETCHED
FOOD SHELVES. THAT SAVINGS IS
NOTHING COMPARED TO MAKING SURE
FOOD SHELVES. THAT SAVINGS IS
NOTHING COMPARED TO MAKING SURE
FOOD SHELVES. THAT SAVINGS IS
NOTHING COMPARED TO MAKING SURE
PEOPLE
FOOD SHELVES. THAT SAVINGS IS
NOTHING COMPARED TO MAKING SURE
PEOPLE HAVE
FOOD SHELVES. THAT SAVINGS IS
NOTHING COMPARED TO MAKING SURE
PEOPLE HAVE ACCESS
FOOD SHELVES. THAT SAVINGS IS
NOTHING COMPARED TO MAKING SURE
PEOPLE HAVE ACCESS TO
FOOD SHELVES. THAT SAVINGS IS
NOTHING COMPARED TO MAKING SURE
PEOPLE HAVE ACCESS TO FOOD."
NOTHING COMPARED TO MAKING SURE
PEOPLE HAVE ACCESS TO FOOD."
PEOPLE HAVE ACCESS TO FOOD."
AD
AD LIB
AD LIB WITH
AD LIB WITH ANCHORS
AD LIB WITH ANCHORS

SVEN,
AD LIB WITH ANCHORS

SVEN, WHAT'S
AD LIB WITH ANCHORS

SVEN, WHAT'S THE
AD LIB WITH ANCHORS

SVEN, WHAT'S THE ONE
AD LIB WITH ANCHORS

SVEN, WHAT'S THE ONE THING
AD LIB WITH ANCHORS

SVEN, WHAT'S THE ONE THING WE
SVEN, WHAT'S THE ONE THING WE
SVEN, WHAT'S THE ONE THING WE
NEED
SVEN, WHAT'S THE ONE THING WE
NEED TO
SVEN, WHAT'S THE ONE THING WE
NEED TO
KNOW
SVEN, WHAT'S THE ONE THING WE
NEED TO
KNOW ABOUT
SVEN, WHAT'S THE ONE THING WE
NEED TO
KNOW ABOUT THE
SVEN, WHAT'S THE ONE THING WE
NEED TO
KNOW ABOUT THE WEATHER
SVEN, WHAT'S THE ONE THING WE
NEED TO
KNOW ABOUT THE WEATHER TODAY?
NEED TO
KNOW ABOUT THE WEATHER TODAY?
KNOW ABOUT THE WEATHER TODAY?
