AMY GOODMAN: We’ve had hundreds of questions
come in from every means to ask you.
One of them is Ty Williams, who asks via Twitter
about Trump exploiting fear.
Ty asked, when you—"[Can] you please expand
on your comments in AlterNet that Trump admin
could stage attack?
What historical parallel do you have in mind?"
NOAM CHOMSKY: Well, actually, the statement
I made was pretty muted.
It wasn’t quite as strong as the headlines
indicated.
What I pointed out—and what everyone, I
think, is aware of—is that sooner or later
this con game is not going to work.
People will understand he’s not bringing
back jobs.
He’s not going to recreate the partly illusory,
partly real picture of what life was like
in the past, with manufacturing jobs and a
functioning society, and you could get ahead,
and so on and so forth.
He’s not going to create that.
What happens at that point?
Something has to be done to maintain control.
The obvious technique is scapegoating.
So blame it on immigrants, on Muslims, on
somebody.
But that can only go so far.
The next step would be, as I said, an alleged
terrorist attack, which is quite easy.
It’s, in fact, almost normal to—like Condoleezza
Rice’s mushroom clouds.
That’s easy to construct, alleged attacks.
The other possibility is a staged attack of
a minor kind.
And how hard would that be?
Take the FBI technique, which they’re using
constantly, of creating situations of entrapment.
Well, suppose one of them goes a little too
far, that you don’t stop it right in time.
That wouldn’t be hard to work out.
I don’t particularly anticipate it, but
it’s a possibility.
And this is a very frightened country.
For years, this has been probably the most
frightened country in the world.
It’s also the safest country in the world.
It’s very easy to terrify people.
AMY GOODMAN: Noam—
