>> I DOUBT WE'LL CALL TO ORDER
HOST COMMITTEE OF THE
CAN WE DO A ROLL CALL.
CHECK IN ORDER WE HAVE MEMBERS
ARE PRESENT. SHOULD WE DO A.
OR DO WE NEED TO MAKE.
>> I MISS JARRETT THEY WERE ABLE TO SEE GOING SEE EVERYBODY'S ON THE CALL OK GOOD
TO GO THEN.
>> GARRARD AGENDA TONIGHT WE HAVE 3 BILLS FIRST ONE IS A
HOSTILE 60 STREETS REPRESENTATIVES STATEMENTS AND
NOTES A
SHARED WORK. I AM OLD
ABILITY MODIFIED ALL REPRESENTATIVE STEPHEN CERTAIN
I WILL OF MOVIES HOST. WELL;
60'S 3 BE REFERRED TO THE DONOR REGISTER. AND THEY'RE GOING TO
PRESENT YOUR BILL PLEASE. >> MISTER CHAIR MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE OF THIS BILL RELATES
TO THE
SHARED WORK. PROGRAM IN CASE; YOU KNOW LIKE I WAS ON MY WITH
THIS PROGRAM OF COURSE ONLY THE AGREED SYNOPSIS THAT
PROGRAM IS ADMINISTERED BY OR UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE SPECIAL
ALLOWS EMPLOYERS TO DIVIDE AVAILABLE HOURS WORK ON A GROUP OF EMPLOYEES AND SET UP
IMPLEMENTING A FULL LAYER.
THESE EMPLOYEES AND RECEIVE PARTIAL UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE BENEFITS FOR WORKING REDUCED
HOURS. SO
FOR EXAMPLE; IF AN EMPLOYER
NEEDS TO CUT 10% OF
THEIR LABOR OSCE INSTEAD OF LAYING OFF 10% OF THEIR WORK OR
SPEAKER YOU SEE HOURS OF TERROR ENTIRE WORK FORCE BY
10% AND
THEN THE EMPLOYEES COULD BE IMPARTIAL IN UNEMPLOYMENT
INSURANCE 2 BIG IF THERE
WEIGHT LOSS. THE BENEFITS OF THIS FOR BUSINESSES THAT ALLOWS
HIM TO CAMP EXPERIENCE AND TRAIN STAFF IN A POSSIBLE POINT
FUTURE HIRING AND TRAINING PLUS INCREASE IN AUSTIN TO INCREASE OPERATIONS QUICKLY
WHEN BUSINESS CONDITIONS OF PAROLE. I WAS ANNOYED AWAY
OFF WHICH CREATES GOOD WILL.
THE EMPLOYER MATCH JUST THE PLAN; BUT THEY SUBMIT FOR
APPROVAL TO BE THE HEALTH AND PENSION PLANS HAVE TO CONTINUE THE SAME
AS THAT OR THE SHARED WORK PLAN
FOR EFFECTIVE EMPLOYEES. ALL EMPLOYERS MUCH I'M SORRY
ALL EMPLOYEES MUST BE FULL TIME OR PART TIME THEY CAN'T BE
SEASONAL
OR TEMPORARY AND UNDER
MINNESOTA LAW THEY HAVE TO HAVE BEEN WITH THE ENQUIRER OR AT
LEAST ONE YEAR PRIOR TO THE START. YEAH; IT'S AT LAST
REQUIREMENT OF THIS STILL
QUALIFIES THIS BILL WOULD CHANGE THAT REQUIREMENT FROM ONE YEAR WITH THE EMPLOYER DOWN
TO BE ONCE THE SNOW CAME FROM A
CONSTITUENT OF THE S L MANY
YEARS BUT ONLY WITH HIS CURRENT EMPLOYER. MONTHS AND SO HE
CAN'T PARTICIPATE IN THE
SHARED WORK THERE'S EMPLOYER HAS IMPLEMENTED AND HE'S JUST
LOST WAGES WITHOUT HAVING ANY ABILITY TO RECOUP ANY OF THE
INSURANCE FUND INSURANCE
THE 12 MONTH REQUIREMENT IS
ACTUALLY THE MOST RESTRICTIVE REQUIREMENT IN THE COUNTRY FOR
SHARED WORK PLANTS; NO OTHER
STATE HAS A ONE YEAR REQUIREMENT. MANY STATES INCLUDING ARKANSAS KANSAS;
MAINE; MISSOURI; NEBRASKA; RHODE ISLAND. ALL HAVE NO PLACE
OF
EMPLOYMENT REQUIREMENT ALL THAT
SNOW TAKES AN OVERALL APPROACH IT TEMPORARILY REDUCES THE LIKES OF EMPLOYMENT
REQUIREMENTS OF
3 MONTHS THAT'S CONSISTENT WITH OUR NEIGHBORS IN WISCONSIN AS
WELL AS MARYLAND
MICHIGAN PENCIL. THANK YOU IT'S A TEMPORARY BASIS FOR THE SUNSET AT THE END OF CALENDAR
YEAR 2020 BECAUSE I WASN'T
SURE HOW MUCH IT WOULD COST MOST TRAGIC OF ALL AND I
THOUGHT THAT THE SUNSET AT THE THE AIR MIGHT MEAN THAT WE CAN
TO PAY FOR ANY
INCREASE COST. MONEY BUT WHEN I GOT THE FISCAL GO BACK I GOT A
VERY PLEASANT SURPRISE WHICH IS THAT. FEDERAL LEGISLATION
PASSED EARLIER THIS YEAR THEY'RE IN THE
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS A FISH OUT THE ENTIRE COST OF SHARED WORK PLANTS FOR THE CREATION OF
2020.
SO COURTNEY; THIS BILL HAS NO FISCAL COST TO THE STATE AT
ALL. >> YOU KNOW; IT'S JUST OH NO NO
I DON'T. DOLLARS NOR DOES IT
SPEND ANY
CARES ACT TO MAKE THIS BENEFIT
ELIGIBLE TO
MORE MINNESOTANS I'M NOT AWARE OF ANY OPPOSITION TO THE BILL WE HAVE A NEW MISSION OF THE JOBS COME ANY A COUPLE WEEKS
AGO SHE HAD NO NEGATIVE FEEDBACK. MISTER CHAIR; HAPPY
TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
>> 3RD PLACE THANK YOU REPRESENT STEVENSON THEY ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE FOR
THE REPRESENTATIVE.
WELL HERE AND I'M GOING TO REDO
MY VOICE THAT LOOKS LIKE RIBS
AND MY LAST QUESTION CLINTON.
BASE CHAIR
I REPRESENT STEVENSON.
>> WHO WHO TRACKS ALL THIS.
I MEAN HOW DID THEY.
HOW DO YOU KNOW LIKE OKAY; LET'S JUST LIKE YOU HAVE WITH
THAT. IF SOMEBODY DOES GET LAID OFF LIKE AFTER THEIR BEEN
ASSURED EMPLOYED. 2 MONTHS
LATER WHO IS TRACKING.
EMPLOYER ALL IS WHAT PART OF.
THE OWNERSHIP OF THE COST OF CLINCHER AN SO IF YOU WILL IF
YOU CAN HELP ME UNDERSTAND THAT.
>> SO IT
IS DAVIDSON. >> THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR IS
MEKELAND I MY INITIAL ASSUMPTION WOULD BE THE ANSWER
THAT QUESTION IS DEDE.
SAY HAVE SHOULD
WORK PLAN IT AND THEN PAYING
ABOUT 2 UNIT OF
GERMAN CHURCH. BUT I'M HAPPY TO FOLLOW UP WITH THE ALONG WITH YOU TO TRY AND GIVE YOU A BETTER ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION.
I THINK BACK WHEN.
THANK YOU CHAIR SUNDAY
>> SO IT WAS A STEVENSON WHAT WENT LIKE THIS REQUIRE MORE
STAFF FOR DITA TO ACCOMPLISH THIS. AS FAR AS TRACKING ALL
THIS BECAUSE ALL PEOPLE WERE OBVIOUSLY TAKES TIME WE ALL
JUST LIKE IT RIGHT. SO TO ME
I'M JUST TRYING TO WRAP BRAIN AROUND LIKE IF IF YOU'RE
SHARING PLOY WHICH I ENJOY THAT
CONCEPT IN MY WAY WELL WHERE I CAN SHARE YOU KNOW SOME
CONTRACTORS.
WHAT WHAT THE DEAN
BE REQUIRED TO HIRE MORE PEOPLE TO TRACK ALL THIS AND SO I MEAN I KNOW THERE'S NO FISCAL KNOW I
GET THAT.
WHO'S GOING TO TAKE ON THIS
ADDITIONAL LABOR TRACK ALL THIS
IF YOU COULD HELP ME
UNDERSTAND THAT.
>> REPRESENTATIVE STEVENSON MISTER WHEN THERE'S NO ADDITIONAL HIRES THE FISCAL
MAKES CLEAR THAT. >> THE DEAL WOULD BE ABLE TO DO
ANY
ADMINISTRATIVE WORK WITH THEIR EXISTING STAFF I KEEP IN MIND THAT IT'S NOT AN EXPANSION OF
THAT.
GRAHAM BECAUSE THE PLAYERS CAN
CHOOSE
TO PARTICIPATE WHETHER OR NOT
THEY'RE QUITE ALL OF THEIR EMPLOYEES ARE HAVE BEEN THERE FOR MONTHS OR 3 MONTHS OR
WHATEVER
IT IS IT JUST ALLOWS PEOPLE WHO CURRENTLY ARE IN A SHARED WORK PLAN THAT BUSINESSES ARE DOING
IT TOO. ACCESS
THE BENEFITS. THEY'VE BEEN
THERE FOR 3 MONTHS INSTEAD
OF 12. WELL SO NO IT WOULD
RESULT IN ANY NEW HIRES AT THE BEST YES EXPLAINED IN THE FISCAL KNOW WHICH I'M HAPPY TO I DON'T KNOW IF THAT WAS PROVIDED TO HIM BY HAPPY TO
SEND YOU A COPY.
>> THE NUMBER BEING NO THANK YOU I THINK THAT THAT CLEARED
UP AND I DO. >> I DID I DO SEE THE LANGUAGE SHARE SO I APPRECIATE YOUR
EXPLAINING. THANK YOU.
>> IT ANY FURTHER
QUESTIONS FOR REPRESENTATIVE
STUDENTS AND HOLES OIL 63. SHERIFFS AND DENVER HAS A QUESTION REPRESENT A BETTER
PLACE.
IF I WAS AN EMPLOYER.
>> I'M THINKING ABOUT THE UNEMPLOYMENT TAXES WILL THIS
AFFECT TO ATTACK SO I IMPLORE HIM ON THE EMPLOYER. IF THIS
PASSES.
STEVENSON.
>> THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR OF SEPTEMBER I THINK THE ANSWER IS NO BECAUSE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S PICKING UP THE ENTIRE TAB OF SHARED WORK.
FOR THE DURATION OF THIS YEAR. SO IT'S NOT COMING OUT THE UNEMPLOYMENT TRUST FUND IS COMING OUT OF THE FEDERAL DEBT.
>> THANK YOU BETTER BETTER THANK YOU; THANK YOU; THANK
YOU. ANY OTHER REGARDING HOUSE
BILL 63.
>> MISTER CHAIR OPINION HERE.
SOPHIE AND PLEASE.
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR; SO JUST A COUPLE REAL QUICK I WANT TO
BE
CLEAR. I'M SOME SET FOR THE END OF THIS YEAR AND WHY SOME
SETTING THIS YEAR.
>> SINCE DAVID'S SON MISTER FANNIE THAT IS THE END OF WHEN
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS
PICKING UP THE COST OF SHARED WORK PLAY SO THERE'S NO COST IF WE'RE GOING TO GO TO THE END OF
THE YEAR. THERE MAY BE A COST IF IT GOES BEYOND THE END OF
THE YEAR.
>> THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR AND AND THAT'S THE END OF THIS
CALENDAR YEAR CORRECTED TO 2020.
>> THE SENATE STEVENSON.
THE SHERIFF DIDN'T YES. >> THANK YOU AND THEN REAL
QUICKLY HOW
ALREADY BUSY ISSUES
OR EMPLOYEE; YOURS ARE CREATING
A SHOULD WORK PROGRAM AND HOW
MANY EMPLOYEES PARTICIPATING IN
A SHARED WORK PROGRAM.
>> SENATOR STEVENSON MISTER CHAIR IF I MAY I'D ASK THOSE QUESTIONS OF DATA AWAITING A
RESPONSE. SANTA FE BE ANYTHING
FURTHER.
>> YES; THANK YOU. MISTER CHAIR JUST A LAST QUESTION WHAT'S
GOING ON WITH THIS OVER A KNOW
NOT TO
MENTION ME. WE CAME ACROSS THE
STREET; BUT I'M ASKING I'M CURIOUS TO KNOW ABOUT WHAT'S GOING ON IN THE CENTRAL
QUESTION WHAT
COLLEGE STATION. WE OUGHT TO HEAD WITH ALL THIS OUT.
>> THE SENTENCE
MISTER CHAIR IS AT CNN CENTER
ERICA SCARING THE BILL IN THE SENATE AND ENTERED ASKED AT A
GOOD CONVERSATIONALIST AT HER CRAFT WHO TOLD ME HE WAS OPEN TO HEARING THE BILL AND I UNDERSTAND THAT SORRY CENTER. WE'RE JUST ALSO HAD
CONVERSATIONS WITH SENATOR
CRAIG.
>> NO THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR;
THANK YOU.
ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS AND HOUSE
FILE 63.
I WILL RENEW MY MOTION AND ALSO
63 BE PREFERRED TO THE
GENERAL REGISTER. ALL THOSE IN
FAVOR SAY AYE.
>> OWES.
>> AND THAT MOTION PREVAILS THANK YOU VERY MUCH
REPRESENTATIVE
>> THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR; I
HOPE YOU ENJOY THE TESTIMONY OF
MY BRILLIANT AND FANTASTIC POLICE CHIEF IN COULD WRAP IT'S ALL COMING UP LATER ON SHE
TWICE. YOU SEE IS EXCELLENT.
>> ARE GOING TO ENTERTAINING
SENATE FILE
REPRESENTATIVE TABC HE IS A
ATTACHED TO THE SWAG NOW REGARDING NEWS ON EMPLOYMENT OR DO SOME THERE'S A TECHNICAL
CHANGE
MADE TO A BILL THAT WE ARE PAST
EARLIER THIS YEAR. I THINK IT WAS REFERRED TO AS THE FABIAN BILL.
DEALS WITH AMUSEMENT RIDES AND
LAWN EQUIPMENT.
>> SO I WILL MOVE BUT THE BILLS SO FILED 5TH.
>> THE AND TO BE.
>> REFERRED TO THE
JOE REGISTER. THERE WAS A CHANCE HE CAN YOU EXPLAIN YOUR
BILL.
>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH MISTER
CHAIR AND MEMBERS YET IT IS PROBLEM WITH THE EFFECTIVE DATE
OF THE DRAFTING OF THE BILL AND WE NEED TO MAKE THIS TECHNICAL
CHANGE IT; BUT WE DEBATED THE
BILL WILL GO INTO EFFECT AND ON AUGUST 1ST;
BUT RIGHT NOW A LOT OF A LONGER
COMPANY AS WELL AS
THE MUSIC PARKS ARE WORKING ON
HIRING FOLKS AS WE COME UP THEY
ARE ALLOWED TO DO THAT AND SO WE WOULD LIKE TO MAKE THE
CHANGE RETROACTIVE BACK TO
MAY 28. THE BILL WAS ENACTED FOR ALL THE CHANGE ALL THE BILL DOES CHANGED THE EFFECTIVE DATE
TO THE DAY AFTER AN ACT.
>> ANY QUESTIONS TO OTHER
CENTER FELL 15.
HEARING NONE I'M GOING TO REDO
OF THE MOTION AND 7 FELL 15 BE 3 FOR DO THE GENERAL REGISTER.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR PLEASE
SAY AYE.
>> I WAS POSED A.
HARRY DUNN THE MOTION PREVAILS.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
IF YOU ARE A KEY.
>> FIZZLES FILE 72;
REPRESENTATIVE HER.
BILL REGARDING
PEACE OFFICER GRIEVANCE ARBITRATOR SELECTION AMENDED ADMIRAL MAKE UNAUTHORIZED.
I WILL MOVE YOUR BILL.
SPELL 72 BE REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE
ON WAYS AND MEANS
REPRESENTATIVE PER YOU PLEASE
>> THANK YOU TO HAVE AN AMENDMENT EXCUSE. THE AMENDMENT
ALL'S TRYING TO EXPLAIN IN
VENICE.
>> SO THIS AMENDMENT ACTUALLY PUTS THE ORDER THAT WE WOULD
LIKE TO LOOK AT HIS FACE AND FEET I WAS GIVEN TO US AND SO
THIS BILL NOW IT JUST MAKES CLEAR THAT THE ARBITRATORS IN
THE SNOW IN THE PROCESS. WELL; MAYBE YOU ARE BUT RATION
YEAH; BUT THOSE 29 IT'S
PEACE OFFICERS AND WE'RE CHANGING THE NUMBER OF
ARBITRATORS AND THE SNOW
25 TO 26. AND THEN IT JUST SAYS THAT THERE'S A POINT FROM THIS
APP PROCESS. PEACE OFFICERS AS
PRACTICES THAT GOES ON THIS ROSTER. HERE GREATEST
PROTECTION CASES FOR CUTS.
>> ANY ON THE AMENDMENT.
OKAY ALL THOSE IN FAVOR PLEASE
SAY AYE.
THERE IS MOTION INSTEAD ABOUT
GOOD.
OH YES; AND TEST THE FIRES 4
HOLES FILE; SO THE 2 OF THEM.
>> I DO CHAIR WOULD YOU LIKE ME
TO DO MY OPENING FIRST WOULD
YOU LIKE TO TESTIFY OR SCHOOL FIRST. >> YOU ALREADY HAVE YOUR
PRESENTATION OF THE BILL. >> THANK YOU CHAIR THANK YOU
CHAIR; AND COMMITTEE FOR THE
RECORD I
AND REPRESENTATIVE KELLY HER
AND I WILL BE SPEAKING TO A PEACE OFFICER CREEPING TRAICION SELECTION PROCEDURE JUST HOUSE
PASSED 2. >> I WANT TO START BY SAYING THAT I'M HERE TODAY BEFORE ALL OF YOU TO MAKE CHANGES TO A
SYSTEM BUT A LOT OF INDIVIDUAL
POWER TO SERVE AND PROTECT THE KILLER.
>> I MEAN GEORGE FLOYD IN BROAD DAYLIGHT. >> IT WOULD BE DISRESPECTFUL AND I ACTUALLY THOUGHT I SAID
THIS KILLING BROUGHT TO LIGHT.
HUGE SYSTEMIC PROBLEMS IN A
POLICE CAR CHAIRED THE CBI EQUAL TREATMENT OF ENFORCEMENT AND JUSTICE HAS BEEN SOMETHING
WELL KNOWN BLACK BROWN INDIGENOUS PEOPLE OF COLOR
COMMUNITIES ARE REALLY LONG
TIME. THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IS THIS TIME IS THAT WE HAVE PROOF
OF THE SENATE. I PROMISE TENSION. THE POLICE
ARE
PATRICIA PROCESS; THIS CURRENT
SITUATION SYSTEM FOR PEACE OFFICERS PROVIDES A FINANCIAL INCENTIVE FOR OPERATORS TO CITE
FIFTY-FIFTY WITH HIM WELL
YOU'RE IN LEE. THAT IS BECAUSE THE RETREAT IS MORE LIKELY TO
BE SELECTED BY THE PARTIES; BUT
THEY HAVE HAD THAT KIND OF A
TRACK RECORD. THIS THIS AMENDED BILL HAS FOUND SOMEBODY TO SEEKS TO ADDRESS THIS IS 2 IT
SHOULD BY MODIFYING
MODIFY HOW I WOULD CHOOSE TO
USE IN PEACE PERCENT PP HAS TRACTION ESTABLISHING AN
ARBITRATOR I SELECTION PROCEDURE THESE CHANGES APPLY TO A PEACE
OFFICER GRIEVANCE ARBITRATIONS WRITTEN THIS BOOK ACTION
DISCHARGE OR TERMINATION AND
MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE
GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE; ALL
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
AGREEMENTS COVERING PEACE OFFICER NEGOTIATED ON OR AFTER
THE ENACTMENT DATE. SO WITH THAT AT YOUR SUNDAY AND I WOULD
LIKE TO I ASKED I 3 A TEST FIRES ARE READY TO TESTIFY AND
I WOULD I CAN INTRODUCE.
HERE WE GO.
>> PLEASE DO GO AHEAD.
>> THANK YOU CHAIR FIRST TESTIFY IS CHIEF BRAD WEISS OF
COON RAPIDS.
>> WHY WOULD YOU JUST
IDENTIFY YOURSELF SO FOR THE RECORD IN A PERCEIVED AS A
TESTIMONY ON ALSO 72.
>> YEAH; THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR; MY NAME IS BRAD WISE AND THE POLICE CHIEF FOR THE CITY
OF
COON RAPIDS. YEAH ACTUALLY I APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO
PRESENT
TO YOU. AND MEMBERS OF YOUR COMMITTEE TALKING ABOUT A CHANGE IN THE GRIEVANCE
ARBITRATION PROCEDURE.
I THINK THE PROBLEMS GRIEVANCE
ARBITRATION ARE
WELL KNOWN. AS WAS POINTED OUT
BY REPRESENTATIVE AND I THINK
THESE PROBLEMS FUNDAMENTALLY
WERE AN INTENTIONAL MEANING THE ARBITRATION STATUTE WAS
WRITTEN TO COVER BOTH INTEREST
AND GRIEVANCE ARBITRATIONS AND WHILE THE CURRENT SELECTION
PROCESS FOR IT TRADERS IN
INTEREST ARBITRATIONS IN MY
VIEW
WORKS PERFECTLY THE SELECTION
PROCESS FOR GRIEVANCE
ARBITRATOR TIONS BECOMES
PROBLEMATIC. AND I'VE BEEN A
STUDENT OF THE ARBITRATION PROCESS FOR A LONG BEEN POLICE CHIEF FOR 9 YEARS BEEN VERY
ENGAGED
IN IN MAKING MYSELF AN EXPERT
ON MINNESOTA'S
IF I AND IF YOU'RE INTERESTED IN SAY THE NEWSPAPERS AND DJ
TIMES COLUMNIST FOR THE START BEING HAS WRITTEN ABOUT POLICE ARBITRATIONS FOR A NUMBER OF
YEARS 30 YEARS.
AND I HIS DATA IS UNIMPEACHABLE
IN HIS STATUS AS THAT
30 YEARS AGO; 50% OF THE LEASE TERMINATIONS WERE OVERTURNED IN
ARBITRATION.
50% OF TERMINATIONS WERE
OVERTURNED THE ARBITRATION.
STATISTICALLY SPEAKING IT'S
JUST NOT POSSIBLE LIKE SPEAKING FOR ANY PLEASE SEE FROM THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA BEFORE ANY
CASE TERMINATION KIDS WOULD GO
TO ARBITRATION WE PUT IT
TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF EFFORT INTO DOCUMENTING. BOTH OF THE
INCIDENTS THAT LEAD TO THE POTENTIAL TERMINATION BUT ALSO THE
PROCESS A LAWFUL PROCESS
BECAUSE.
PROFESSIONALLY SPEAKING IN ALL
OF YOU AS WELL.
RESPECT DUE PROCESS; WE RESPECT DUE PROCESS RIGHTS THAT WERE
GIVEN 2 UNIONS
IN THAT THERE'S NOTHING WRONG EXTENDING DUE PROCESS TO ANYONE
UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE.
WHAT EXPERIENCE HAS SHOWN;
HOWEVER IS THAT THE WAY THAT
RAN SYSTEM IS WRITTEN THE WAY THE STATUTE IS WRITTEN AND THE
RULES ARE WRITTEN FOR
AGREEMENTS ARE REACHED RATION.
I WANT TO GRIEVANCES BROUGHT TO THE BUREAU OF MEDIATION
SERVICES.
A REMEDIATION SERVICES WILL
SEND A LIST OF 7 AND AVAILABLE OR OR TRADERS FROM THAT LIST OF
7 EACH SIDE MEANING THE EMPLOYER AND THEN THE EMPLOYEE
WILL TAKE TURNS STRIKING ONE
NAME. FROM THE LIST UNTIL
ONE ARBITRATOR REMAINS AND THE WAY ARBITRATORS ARE NOT A FULL-TIME POSITION ARBITRATORS
ARE CONTRACTORS THAT ARE PAID
BY THE SO TRUTHFULLY THEY HAVE A
FINANCIAL INCENTIVE TO BEING SELECT DID IF I DON'T GET
SELECTED; I DON'T EARN A LIVING
SO I HAVE THIS INCENTIVE TO
BE SELECTED. AND IT DOESN'T
TAKE A LOT OF DEEP THINKING TO REALIZE THAT IF I HAVE FOR
EXAMPLE FOR. PRO EMPLOYER
DECISIONS IN
A ROW IN MY MOST RECENT
ARBITRATIONS IS THAT THE
EMPLOYEE IS LIKELY TO STRIKE ME FROM THE LIST AS BEING TOO PRO EMPLOYER AND THE CONVERSE IS
TRUE
IN SEOUL WINDS UP HAPPENING IS
THAT ITS SIDE TAKES TURNS
STRIKING ONE NAME FROM THE LIST. UNTIL THE ONE PERSON WHO
REMAINS IS THE ONE PERSON HAS
IT.
FIFTY-FIFTY ORDER AN EVEN SPLIT
ON DECISIONS. AND THE
ARBITRATORS WHO WEREN'T
SELECTED IN YOU KNOW; I'M NOT SAYING THAT THEY'RE TRYING THAT ARBITRATORS WOULD MANIPULATE
THEIR DECISION-MAKING PROCESS;
I'M JUST SAYING I THINK THE SYSTEM WOULD BE WELL SERVED IF
THERE WEREN'T A
FINANCIAL INCENTIVE TO BEING SELECTED AND I THINK A
REPRESENTATIVE HERS BILL IS GOING TO PRESCRIBE
A
PROCESS WHEREBY I'M IN ELIGIBLE
LIST OF ARBITRATORS WHO ARE
SPECIFICALLY TRAINED. 4 POLICE
MATTERS WILL BE RANDOMLY SELECTED WHEN A GRIEVANCE IS
BROUGHT TO THE BUREAU OF
MEDIATION SERVICES STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS; BUT I GUESS THAT WOULD BE MY MY INITIAL
STATEMENT.
>> THANK YOU VERY CHIEF COMEY
GO OUT OF
JUST THE FIRES AND THEN HOLD
OPEN IT UP FOR QUESTIONS.
AFTERWARDS SO I GUESS NEXT WE HAVE CHIEF MIKE TUSKEN FROM THE
DULUTH
POLICE DEPARTMENT. THESE ARE GOING TO SEE YOURSELF CENTER
JUST ONE.
>> CHAIR AT MY NAME IS LIKE
JUSTIN OF SERVICE D POLICE CHIEF FOR THE CITY OF DULUTH
FOR THE ABOUT THE LAST 5 YEARS; CHIEF TWICE I HIT THE NAIL ON
THE HEAD. THE KIDS COVERED ALL OF MY SPEAKING POINTS AND I DON'T WANT TO BE REDUNDANT TO
BE RESPECTFUL OF
YOUR TIME. I WILL TELL YOU
THAT AT VERY FRUSTRATED WITH THE ARBITRATION SYSTEM FOR MANY
OF THE REASONS THAT
WERE CITED. WE THERE IS A FINANCIAL BENEFIT
FOR ARBITRATORS.
SPLIT THE BABY IF YOU WILL AND
WE SEE THIS AND THEY THE
SELECTION PROCESS. THEY SAID SHE A PREEMPTIVE TORY
CHALLENGING JUST
TO REMOVE REMOVE REMOVING YOUR SET WITH AN ARBITRARY THAT EVERYONE CAN AGREE ON WELL THAT
SOUNDS FUNDAMENTALLY FAIR.
IT
IS FLAWED. AS MUCH AS THERE ARE
PEOPLE ON
EACH SIDE. WELL IT WOULD BUT THEY REPRESENT THE EMPLOYER AND
THE EMPLOYEE WHO WILL REMOVE PEOPLE THAT THEY DON'T THEY'RE
GOING TO GET DUE PROCESS.
BY FRUSTRATION NOW MOST
RECENTLY WAS OKAY; SO WHERE WE.
TERMINATED EMPLOYEE.
DRAGGING A GENTLEMAN DOWN THE SKYWALK 90 THE HITTING HIS HEAD
ON THE DARK. AND
WE HAVE THAT OVERTURNED IN
ARBITRATION WE TOOK IT TO THE DISTRICT COURT LEVEL THE APPEAL
COURT LEVEL ON THE STREAM LEVEL
AND
WE WE DID NOT PREVAIL AND WAS
REINSTATED AND
WE IN LAW ENFORCEMENT WE SO MUCH IS AT STAKE IN OUR
COMMUNITIES SO MUCH. AND WE SEE
THAT MOST RECENTLY.
AND ICE ROUTINELY TALK ABOUT THE SOCIAL CONTRACT IN THE IMPORTANCE OF BUILDING TRUST IN
OUR ORGANIZATIONS AND MANY
TIMES MY COMMUNITY; WE'LL REACH OUT TO ME WHEN THERE IS A
WHAT THEY
SEE A IN INJUSTICE IN AN ARBITRATION PROCESS IN SEVERAL
CHIEF WHY DIDN'T YOU. IF YOU REALLY WERE ADVOCATING FOR US.
WHY DIDN'T SHE THEN TERMINATE THE
EMPLOYEE AND THEY DON'T NECESSARILY. JANET WHY MAY HAVE
TERMINATED
THE EMPLOYEE. THE DUE PROCESS COMPONENT BROUGHT THEM BACK AND
EVEN THOUGH I EXHAUSTED
APPEALS. IT IT REALLY RINGS
WHOLE WITH THEM ABOUT HOW HARD
WE WORKED.
A POLL THAT THAT SOCIAL TO
SPEAK TO THE IMPORTANCE OF US BEING FAIR IMPARTIAL AND SHOWING COMPASSION CARE IN OUR
WORK.
NOW WE KNOW THAT THE VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE WHO DO THIS
DO IT FOR THE RIGHT REASONS;
BUT WE DO HAVE PEOPLE ISAAK
PROFESSION THAT THAT DOES.
WE SHOULD NOT HOW IN THE POLICE CHIEF IS BEST POSITION TO MAKE
THOSE DECISIONS WITH THEIR
COMMAND STAFF.
THE CURRENT PROSTRATE NOW
REALLY MAKES ME AND I KNOW OTHER CHIEFS AROUND THE STATE
FEEL HAMSTRUNG BY INABILITY TO DECIDE WHO WILL BE SERVING YOUR
COMMUNITIES.
AND WITH I WILL BACK TO THE
CHAIR OTHER TESTIMONY. THANK
YOU.
>> THANK YOU CHIEF TUSKEN APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS NEXT
UP WE HAVE HAD THE AD.
GENERAL COUNSEL FOR THE LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES IS A GOOD NIGHT. JENNIFER YOURSELF AN END. A PROCEED OR THEIR
TESTIMONY.
>> THANK YOU
MISTER CHAIR. >> I'M PRETTY I'M TRISHA BE AM
GENERAL COUNSEL FOR THE
MINNESOTA SEA. PRIOR TO
ASSUMING THE GENERAL COUNCIL POSITION I WAS A LITIGATOR
RELEASE INSURANCE TRUST IN 20
YEARS.
>> MINNESOTA CITIES AND WHY IT MATTERS IN STATE COURT AND
DURING THIS TIME. I SAW PART TO
ME
YOU WEREN'T IT'S MY DECISION IS TAKEN OUT OF THE HANDS OF THE
PUBLIC AND
CITY OFFICIALS RESPONSIBLE FOR PUBLIC SAFETY INCLUDE EXPERIENCE SPEAK WE'RE MINDING
THE EAST PEACE.
>> I START THAT
UNIONS HAVE. >> PLACE UNIONS PLAYED IN COURT EARLIER PERCENT PP INTERESTS OF
EMPLOYEES IN THE NUMBERS.
HOWEVER; THE CURRENT ITERATION SYSTEM. >> AND RIGHT NOW THE PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES DO SAY.
OVER THE CONTINUED EMPLOYMENT OF THOSE EMPLOYEES THAT IT WILL
REALLY SURE WE'RE IS AND
COMMUNITIES
>> IN NUMEROUS CASES; THE 3RD PARTY ACTUALLY HAS BEEN ABLE TO LOT OF THE 2ND HALF.
>> THE SHE'S JUST
A DECISION. REVERSE REDUCE I
MEAN OFFICERS BASED ON THE ARBITRATOR SENSE OF WHAT IS
RIGHT FOR US.
>> THIS IS RESULTED IN THE FINAL DECISIONS THAT CANNOT BE
HEATED OR SUCCESSFULLY.
>> RICIN I DECISION
TO STAY. THIS IMPACTS ON THE
LEASE OPERATIONS. HE DID
YOU MENTION. >> AND EVEN THE FUTURE OF THE SCHOOL SAFETY OF THOSE WHO IS
JUST WANT TO PROTECT.
THERE WERE CASES INVOLVING
POLICE OFFICERS LINED THE
SLEEP WORKS. IT'S THE ONLY TO RE WORKINGS OF FORCES REQUIRED
BY
CITY POLICY. WHEN YOU SEE ON
LAW OR EXCESSIVE FORCE AND CITIZENS AND EVEN IN THOSE
CASES WHERE THERE WERE
MULTIPLE OFFENSES. AND IF YOU
LOVE SARAH I LIKE TO DO
YOUR NATIONS. HOW'S THE ARBITRATORS STILL ISSUE TO COURT TO REINSTATE IT AND THEN
OFFICER ORDER STRONG
OBJECTIONS; BUT WE SEE THE HR
DIRECTOR; THE CITY MANAGER IN SOMETHING EVEN OVER THE OBJECTIONS OF OTHER NEW
YORKERS.
IT HAS BEEN A LONGSTANDING BELIEVE
MINNESOTA CITIES TO SUPPORTING
YOU. THIS IN THE
CLEANEST COM. YEAH; IT'S EMPLOYER TO PASS THE MANDATORY
OR TREE SHE ASKED TO SPEAK
THE WIRE. CURRENTLY IN MINNESOTA STATUTE; 1; 7; I AM
POWER WAS OUT.
THE
LISA WORKS HOW HAS THAT 72 TO THE EXTENT THAT IT PROVIDES A NEW AND BETTER PROCESS FOREVER
TO SELECTION IN AT LEAST
DECEMBER SEEMS. BUT IN ADDITION
REFORMS NEED IT.
THE CURRENT PATIENTS AS TO HOW
WOULD LARGELY BE AT AND
CONTINUE TO PERPETUATE
A SIGNIFICANT THOSE UNTOUCHABLE
ARBITRATION ORDERS BECAUSE A NEAR IMPOSSIBILITY OF THE
THE HOUSE ISN'T EXPLICITLY
STATED INCOME IN THE STATE
RIGHT NOW MAKES THE RIGHTS OF
CITIZENS HERE. IT'S NOT SIGNIFICANT FOR THE REFORM THE CURRENT SYSTEM WILL STILL ALLOW
OUR CREATOR
AND THE TO UNDERMINE
THIS POLICY. THE BALANCE IN FAVOR OF HEALTH SAFETY AND
WELFARE OF CITIZENS. REALLY
THIS TIME. SO WITHOUT FURTHER
IT FORWARD. POLICE CHIEF COLONEL OFFICIALS WILL CONTINUE
TO HAVE
POSSIBLY WORK IN THE AIR FOR ME
TO DO TO PROTECT
THEIR COMMUNITY. THESE RIGOROUS
AND WE'RE COUNTING REALLY TRANSPARENCY STANDARDS ARE TRADED IN THEIR NEEDED NOW MORE
THAN EVER.
CHANGES TO THE CURRENT
TEMPERATURE ISSUE PROCESS IN
THE STATUTE AND UNDER THE RULES
AND AS HE SAYS OR PROCESS AND THE 2. WE LOOK FORWARD TO
WORKING WITH YOU IN JUST 8 YEARS. >> APIS SIGNIFICANTLY CHANGE
THE STANDARD INSTANCE. >> ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE TEST
THE FIRE THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
>> WE HAVE REPRESENTED AMBER.
REPRESENTATIVE BETTER PLACE.
>> HAVE A QUESTION.
POLICE OFFICERS ALSO
A VETERAN. NOW WE HAVE A LOT OF VETERANS THAT COME OFF THE
MILITARY.
HAS NOT REPLACE AND SO FORTH MAY AGAIN ALL THE LAW
ENFORCEMENT.
AND WE HAVE ACTUALLY
PREFERENCES I KNOW THE LAST
SEVERAL YEARS.
SUCH COUNTRIES AFFAIRS WORKED THROUGH THESE SEXUAL
PREFERENCES. I WANT TO COME
STEWART RATION. DOES YOUR BILL
EFFECT. A VETERAN PREFERENCES.
>> ALL.
>> IF YOU DON'T KNOW IF YOU
COULD MAYBE CONTACT.
THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS AND SEE. HOW THIS TIES
IN WITH VETERAN PREFERENCES AND I KNOW WE HAVE SOME GREAT PEOPLE BUT
IT SERVES OUR NATION AND
HAVE GOTTEN TO A LAW ENFORCEMENT SO I HAVE A QUESTION THAT'S A BEST BUY
QUESTION IF YOU COULD CHECK
INTO THAT. LOOK AT HER AND THE
RESPONSE.
>> REPRESENTATIVE DEBORAH;
THANK YOU FOR THE QUESTION I DON'T I DON'T I DIDN'T
SPECIFICALLY LOOK AT THIS
BECAUSE I'M ME AND I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S MUCH BETTER STATED
IN STATUTE.
IS THIS. THIS PARTICULAR PIECE OF LEGISLATION DOES NOT GO TO
POWER; IT GOES TO CHECK YOUR
SECTOR 6 26 WHICH IS DIFFERENT SECTION OBSESSED
ACTUALLY
DONE SO I WILL CHECK INTO THAT AND JUST TO MAKE SURE; BUT YOU
KNOW IT THE OTHER FRANCIS TO TELL RIGHT ACTUALLY DOESN'T IMPACT AND YOU
AT ALL.
>> I APPRECIATE THAT I START I
DON'T SERVE ON THE NEXT COMMITTEE SO IT COULD GET BACK
TO PRE SHANNON.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS.
>> MISTER CHAIR NEXT UP WE
HAVE PERCENT MICHAEL D NOW SENDING AND FOLLOWING THAT IS
RECKONED MEKELAND.
>> IT REPRESENTED NELSON PLEASE
THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR; ALL REPRESENT HER I WANT TO THANK YOU LIMITING IT
TO THE
POLICE OFFICERS AND WHAT THEY HAVE EXTRAORDINARY POWERS AND.
MAYBE THEY NEED TO HAVE DIFFERENT DIFFERENT CHARM
TRAICION ROLES; BUT ALL AS
A 4 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE AND A
FORMER BUSINESS ASIAN FRY BY UNION. THEY REPRESENT THE
PUBLIC AND
PRIVATE EMPLOYEES ALL THE ARBITRATION PROCESS IS THERE TO PROTECT EMPLOYEES ARE SOMETIMES
SO BAD SOME MANAGEMENT.
BOARD AND ACT LIKE THEY
ACT DIFFERENTLY. SO WE NEED THE PROCESS; I'M GLAD
WE DIDN'T GO AFTER THE SO THEY'RE ALSO THERE TO PROTECT
THE UNION EMPLOYEES. THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO FORM UNIONS THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO HAVE THE REPRESENTATION THEY
WANT AND ALL.
SHOULD BE ON
GOING AFTER THE UNIONS ON THIS THE UNION OFFICIALS HAVE TO REPRESENT THEIR EMPLOYEES OTHERWISE THEY
COULD BE SUED BY THE EMPLOYEES IF THEY DON'T
REPRESENT THEIR WAYS IN THESE SPECIALLY
EVEN SATCHELS AND AND
DISCIPLINE ISSUES. THEY CAN BEGIN A HELD LIABLE FOR AN ACTION ON THEIR PART SO
I THINK AGAIN THANK
YOU FOR OVER THE ANSWER THE POLICE OFFICERS BECAUSE THEY
ARE DIFFERENT GROUP OF EMPLOYEES. THEY HAVE
EXTRAORDINARY POWERS THAT WE GRAFT SHOULD BE ABLE TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE HOLDING THEM A
CALL.
>> THANK YOU REPRESENTATIVE REPRESENTATIVE MATT CLEMENT
QUESTIONS.
>> ACTUALLY YEAH.
A COUPLE THANK YOU CHAIR SUNDAY; SO IN RESPONSE TO NELSON JUST SAID. I THINK A LOT
OF UNIONS. HE'S HAD A LOT OUR PEOPLE IN TEACHERS BUT THAT'S
NOT MY QUESTION. SO MY QUESTION
IS TO REPRESENT HER.
IS THERE NOT A REASON WHY WE
COULD NOT GIVE
THIS TO ALLOW LIKE MINNEAPOLIS CITY KELSO ON THE MARE AND SAME
ALL AND NOSE TO INSTITUTE
THESE PROGRAMS; I'M AT WHERE THAT'S BEST FOR THEIR AREAS
BECAUSE WE DON'T SEE THIS
PROBLEM EVERYWHERE; AND WHY DO WE WANT TO MAKE A STATEWIDE POLICY AND MY SECOND QUESTION
IS GOING TO BE THE CHEAP WHY
US CAN I SAID RICE RIGHT; I'M SORRY FOR THEM; BUT DON'T YOU THINK LOCAL CONTROL BE BETTER FOR
WHAT YOU SEE SENIOR COMMUNITIES
RATHER THAN A STATEWIDE BLANKET
POLICY THAT COVERS EVERYTHING THAT CREATE A WHOLE
LOT OF PAPERWORK. LOT OF PEOPLE AFTER ALL YOU CAN AND TRY TO REALLY APPRECIATE IT. THANK
YOU. >> AUTHOR PLEASE RESPOND FIRST.
>> I THANK YOU CHAIR AND
THANK YOU. I KNOW I COULDN'T
SEE YOUR HOME AND THANK YOU FOR THE QUESTION AND I THINK THAT
IS A REALLY
LEGITIMATE QUESTION. BUT WE ARE SHRINKING KNOW THAT ACTUALLY THIS IS NOT A MINNEAPOLIS SAINT
PAUL ISSUE. I WOULD LIKE TO CAST DEAL WAS KILLED HE WAS
KILLED BY SAINT ANTHONY OUT
STOP STICKS. WE'VE HAD
INCIDENTS IN HOPKINS AT
REALLY AM HIGH-PROFILE INCIDENT
WHICH AVERAGE PERCENT OF HOW IT
IS AND TRYING TO ADDRESS AND
SEEK JUSTICE. THE LAST TIME WE SEE ACTUALLY THIS ALL AND I CAN
JUST SAY THAT FROM MY OWN
PERSONAL STAFF. THE TIMES IN WHICH I'M ACTUALLY CALL OUT AS A COP IS ACTUALLY TONIGHT WE
CAN SAY IT AND SO I THINK THAT HE WOULD BE AROUND THE U.S. FOR
US TO SAY
THIS IS A MINNEAPOLIS A HOT ISSUE AND JUST TOOK THAT TO ADDRESS THAT WE KNOW THAT THIS
IS NOT THIS IS A STATEWIDE ISSUE AND THIS IS ACTION
NATIONWIDE ISSUE WHICH
IS WHY. THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS
OF PEOPLE IN THE STREETS MARCHING AND PROTESTING WHICH IS WHY THEIR PROTEST ACROSS THE WORLD BECAUSE THIS IS AN ISSUE
THAT HAS NOT HAPPENED SINCE.
GUEST.
>> I
WEISER TUSCAN RESPOND AS WELL
TO QUESTIONS. WE MISTER
CHAIR REPRESENT
TO MACKLIN YES STAY WHAT WELL ACTUALLY THE THE CHANGES THAT
ARE BEING PROPOSED UNDER
GRIEVANCE ARBITRATION RELATED TO. POLICE IS REALLY
JUST THE MANNER IN WHICH
THE ARBITRATOR
IS CHOSEN.
>> IN AND WE'RE TRYING TO
REMOVE THEIR BEING TO A
5050. PORTFOLIO DECISIONS AND
TRUTHFULLY THAT
THAT. REMOVING THAT FINANCIAL INCENTIVE TO SOMETHING THAT
NEEDS TO APPLY STATE WIDE AND
ACTUALLY YOU CAN IF YOU WENT TO THE BUREAU MEDIATION SERVICES
WEBSITE.
IN LOOK THROUGH SOME OF THE ARBITRATION DECISIONS THAT ARE
RELATED TO LAW ENFORCEMENT.
I'LL GIVE YOU A GOOD
EXAMPLE TO. YOU'LL GET A SENSE
OF THE KIND OF DECISIONS THAT
ARE BEING BUT ONE OF THE THINGS REPRESENTATIVE HERS IS TOUCHING
ON IS AND SHE TALKS TO SKIN IN
DULUTH IS TOUCHING ON IS THE
SIGNIFICANCE OF USE OF FORCE
POLICY VIOLATIONS AND THAT THEY
NEEDED TO BE TREATED MORE SERIOUSLY SO. BLAME THE CITY OF
BLAINE.
SUCCESSFULLY TERMINATED AN
EMPLOYEE IN
2019. IN THAT ISSUE WAS RELATED TO OVER TIME AND OVER TIME AS
SHE
WAS THE THE OFFICER DIDN'T WANT
TO WORK OVERTIME DIDN'T WANT TO
WORK
MANDATORY OVERTIME. ANY MANIPULATED THE SOFTWARE WITHIN THE DEPARTMENTS SO THAT HE
SOMEHOW GOT EXCLUDED FROM THEIR
OVERTIME PROVISIONS THAT
OFFICER WAS SUCCESSFULLY
TERMINATED. MEANWHILE; THE RICHFIELD CASE AND THE DULUTH CASE REGARDING USE OF FORCE
EXCESSIVE USE OF FORCE. BOTH OF
THOSE EMPLOYEES WON
THEIR JOB. AND I WOULD LIKE TO SEE ARBITRATORS HAVE LAW
ENFORCEMENT SPECIFIC TRAINING.
SO THAT THEIR TREE AND WOULD UNDERLINE THE IMPORTANCE OF
WHAT MATTERS TO THEM
THE EMPLOYEE BLAME PROBABLY
SHOULD'VE LIKELY REMAIN
TERMINATED. DUE TO HIS DISHONESTY BUT POLICE I
ASSURE YOU EVERY POLICE
CHIEF IS ARE MORE CONCERNED ABOUT SOMEBODY WHO HAS TROUBLE
CONTROLLING THEIR TEMPER. THEN THEY DO ABOUT SOMEBODY TRYING TO MANIPULATE THE SYSTEM
SO THEY DON'T FORCED OVERTIME
ON 4TH OF JULY. SO THOSE ARE MY
COMMENTS THANK YOU SIR.
>> THERE WAS A TEST GIVEN YOU LIKE TO WEIGH IN ON THE
PRESIDENT.
>> IF IT INDEED; CHIEF MAY BE
REPRESENTED MANY LAWMAKERS
OVER. SO YEAH;
IT IS. >> I FALL CHIEF WISE AND HE WELL READ ON THIS ISSUE.
>> AS
AM I. WHEN WE LOOK AT THE ARBITRATOR DECISIONS YOU THEY
ARE HEAD SCRATCHERS
AT TIMES. SOME OF THE SOME OF EMPLOY SOME OF THE POLICE
OFFICERS ARE LOSING
THEIR JOBS OR IN MY OPINION FOR
FAR LESS THEN. USE OF
FORCE ISSUE OR A SUBSTANTIAL
BREACH OF PUBLIC TRUST WHERE
REGION YOUR COMMUNITY WHERE YOU
ERODE PUBLIC TRUST.
IT HAS A DETRIMENTAL IMPACT NOT
JUST FOR DAYS OR WEEKS OR
MONTHS; BUT IT CAN GO ON
FOR YEARS. ITS OWN IS SO HARD FOR US WE WORK SO HARD TO BUILD
TRUST AND RELATIONSHIP LET'S
ENGAGE OUR COMMUNITY.
AND IT ONLY TAKES ONE INCIDENT OF USE OF FORCE THAT SUCCESS OF
AND OFTEN TIMES IT IS AGAINST
PEOPLE WHO ARE PEOPLE OF COLOR.
AND WE WORK SO HARD IN THOSE
COMMUNITIES TO BUILD RELATIONSHIPS AND TRUST AND IT
CAN BE WAS SWEPT AWAY IN A
MOMENT. THE PROCESS IN PLACE
RIGHT NOW
IS TRULY FLAWED AND WE HAVE TO LOOK AT AS MUCH AS I WANT TO
SEE OUR EVERY SINGLE PLAY GET
DUE PROCESS. I ALSO KNOW THAT
THERE IS A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT AT STAKE EVERY TIME WE GO TO ARGUE
ARBITRATION.
I AGREE AND I CAN'T REMEMBER THE REPRESENTATIVES NAME THE TALKED ABOUT YOU KNOW THERE ARE
TIMES WHERE YOU MAY HAVE
BEEN OVERZEALOUS BOSS THAT MAY USING HIS POSITION TO IMPOSE
HIS WILL OR 2 A IN FACT YOUR
EMPLOYMENT.
OR TRAICION IS THAT WE'RE GOING TO OR BECAUSE THERE ARE A
SUBSTANTIAL BREEZE.
THERE ARE VIOLATIONS OF CODE OF
CONDUCT THAT WE SEE IS NOT
ACCEPTABLE IN OUR PROFESSION AND WE HAVE TO HAVE INTEGRITY AND HONOR WE
HAVE TO DO OUR JOBS BECAUSE
WE'RE A MONOPOLY YOU DON'T GET TO ALL THE OTHER POLICE DEPARTMENT MAY BE OUTSIDE THE
JURISDICTION BECAUSE YOU LIKE THAT BETTER THAT MEANS WE NEED
TO SHOW UP EVERY DAY. OUR BEST
AND BE OUR BEST. AND IF WE ARE EMPLOYEES WHO
CANNOT SELF-REGULATE. ESPECIALLY WHEN THERE'S TIMES
WHEN USE OF FORCE IS NEEDED.
ABSOLUTELY ERODES PUBLIC TRUST AND THAT WILL ALWAYS
IMPACT OUR ABILITY TO PROVIDE SAFE COMMUNITIES. WHEN THE VERY
CITIZENS RELY ON TO KEEP TO WORK IN PARTNERSHIP TO KEEP OUR
COMMUNITY SAFE. I'VE TURNED
THEIR BACK ON US AND THIS IS THE PROBLEM I'VE SEEN FOR YEARS AND THIS IS SOMETHING I THINK
WE ABSOLUTELY HAVE
TO ADDRESS AND NOW BE A PROCESS WHERE THERE IS TRULY A FAIR OUTCOME. YOU KNOW YOU'LL THANK
YOU SO MUCH.
>> THANK YOU CHIEF HAS
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE TEST FIRES ANY OTHER COMMENTS
FROM THOUGH.
>> SEARCHERS ARE SAID TO CHEERS
AND I'M STILL AIR ALL.
THANK YOU
CHAIR IT'S OK I UNDERSTAND IT'S
GETTING LATE RAY. A LOT MORE TO
DO
IT TONIGHT. I APPRECIATE EARLIER HEARD FROM BOTH OF
THESE CHIEFS OF POLICE AND I
ALSO BELIEVE BOTH EU TOO KNOW YOUR COMMUNITIES BETTER THAN
ANYONE.
AND THAT'S WHERE I'M CONCERNED
ABOUT A ONE SIZE FITS ALL KIND
OF BLANKET THING TO A STATE.
WE ALL KNOW WHAT WE NEED TO DO WE ALL KNOW WE DON'T LIKE
WHAT'S BEEN GOING ON.
BEST PART OF MY CONCERN WITH THAT I'M ALSO GOING TO SAY I
DON'T LIKE TO ASK FOR A ROLE.
>> THE ROLL CALL HAS BEEN
CALLED FOR WE WILL DO THAT ANY OTHER COMMENTS ERUPTION
AMERICAN.
NOW I'M GOOD THANK YOU OKAY; THANK YOU VERY CHIEF TUSKEN
VIDEO OTHER COMMENTS.
>> AND YOU TO THE QUESTION IT IS NOT A PROBLEM; SPECIFIC TOO.
THE
METRO AREA. I MEAN I'M I'M 150 MILES UP IN NORTHERN MINNESOTA HERE WHERE EVERYTHING IS
PERFECT. WE KNOW;
BUT THE REALITY IS THESE PROBLEMS WE TALKED TO CHIEFS
ACROSS EVERY CAR THE STATE IF
STATEMENT SIMILAR
PROBLEMS WEEK AND I HAVE LOCAL CONTROL ON AN RELY ON LOCAL
CONTROL TO CHANGE POLICIES. THAT IMPACT
THE ENTIRE STATE AND STATEWIDE IN MINNESOTA WE NEED HOW THE
POLICY OF PRACTICES
IN PLACE THAT WILL ALLOW US TO
DO OUR WORK HONORABLY IT WILL
ALLOW US TO BE ABLE
TO DECIDE GUY WHO GETS TO SERVE THAT COMMUNITY ON THEIR WORST DAY ARE MOMENTS OF THEIR LIVES.
AND IT ALSO IS NOT A REMOVING
DUE PROCESS. IT'S A IT'S A
CHANGE IN WHAT DUE PROCESS
LOOKS LIKE A CHANGE IN HOW WE SELECT THOSE ARBITRATORS BUT I
WILL ASSURE WITH THE OVER 400 CHIEFS OF
POLICE CROSS WE MEET EVERY YEAR AT CONVENTIONS HAVE CONVERSATIONS WITH THIS IS A
PROBLEM NOT JUST THE METRO AREA BUT IN RURAL MINNESOTA AS WELL.
THANK YOU.
>> THANK YOU CHIEF TUSKEN.
MISTER DO THEIR BRAND WISE CAN
A ONE-UP HAS GOOD GOOD GOOD
CHIEF PLACE. YEAH IN AND SHE TALKS TO MENTION THAT DUE
PROCESS IS AND CHANGED AND I TERMINATED
EMPLOYEE WILL STILL BE ABLE
TO DO PROCESS THE OTHER THING
THAT I LIKE A LOT ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR BILL IS THAT NO LEAVE LABOR AGREEMENT; NO
EXISTING
LABOR AGREEMENT. >> WE'LL NEED TO BE CHANGED BUT THE LANGUAGE CAN REMAIN THE SAME BETWEEN IN THE UNION AND
THE CITIES. THANKS FOR THAT CLARIFICATION.
>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE
TEST THE FIRES OF THE AUTHOR.
MISTER CHAIR.
REPRESENT OUR STATE.
>> THAT VERY MISTER CHAIR MEMBERS I JUST WANTED TO
REPRESENTED HER FOR
THIS BILL. AND I JUST WANT TO SAY YOU KNOW HERE IN
MINNEAPOLIS; I'M GETTING A LOT OF CONSTITUENT INTEREST AND
CONCERN
QUITE RIGHT WHAT ABOUT THE WHICH I DON'T THINK FUNCTIONS
LIKE A
TRADITIONAL UNION I THINK IT IS
VERY MUCH AN IMPEDIMENT TO THE KINDS OF SYSTEMIC DO SYSTEMIC
CHANGES THAT WE NEED TO MAKE IN
POLICING
HERE IN MANY LISTEN AND AND AROUND THE STATE SO I THINK THIS IS AN IMPORTANT FIRST STEP AND I STRONGLY SUPPORT THE
BILL.
>> MISTER CHAIR OF THE SENATE
BOGLE HAS
A QUESTION AND MEMBERS PLEASE
STAY ON THE CALL AFTER ROLL CALL OF THIS BILL WE HAVE TO GO BACK AND DO ROLL CALL ON THE
PREVIOUS 2 BILLS CONCERNED ABOUT THAT PERCENT OF THE VOTE.
>> THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR
AND I I KNOW THERE WAS DISCUSSION BEFORE THAT ON THE
EVIDENCE THAT IT SHOULD
BE NECESSARY. >> FOR ALL AND I PUBLIC UNION
EMPLOYEES AND I. LOOKING AT THIS AND I'M
THINKING YOU KNOW I I THINK ALL OF US ARE HORRIFIED
BY WHAT HAPPENED IN MINNEAPOLIS. I ALSO SAY THAT WE'RE SINGLING OUT NOW A SINGLE
GROUP OF PEOPLE
THAT. FOR THE MOST PART FOR THE VERY MOST PART ARE DOING THEIR
JOB HE AND IT TRYING
TO COME ALL SAFELY AND NIGHT
AND LOOK BEFORE I LET QUESTION
REPRESENTATIVE
HER IS. WHY ARE WE APPLYING
THIS TO OTHER GROUPS WITH THE SEC. THE MESSAGE BECAUSE I
THINK IT'S ONLY RIGHT. WHETHER
IT
BE YOU TEACHER OR SOCIAL WORKER; WHENEVER I THINK YOU'RE
ABSOLUTELY RIGHT THAT WE
SHOULD BE LOOKING AT THE
GRIEVANCE
PROVISIONS AND IN MAKING SURE THAT WE'RE DOING THIS RIGHT AND IF WE ARE DOING THIS RIGHT AND THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO HAPPEN TO
BE ANOTHER PURPOSE HER FASHIONS
BUT ARE ALSO HAVING
PUBLIC CONTENT AND YOU KNOW THERE'S THERE'S OBVIOUSLY THE PHYSICAL ABUSE WHICH WHICH WE
JUST SAW WHICH IS TO
TRY AND BUT THERE'S ALSO AN EMOTIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL
ABUSE SECOND HAPPENED. AND THAT COULD HAPPEN WAS DIFFERENT TYPES OF
EMPLOYEES AS WELL SO MY
QUESTION IS WHY ARE WE JUST DOING THIS FOR THIS ONE GROUP I
REALIZE IS IN FRONT OF US RIGHT
NOW. BUT IF WE REPEAL AND TO
CORRECT THE PROBLEM DON'T WE WANT TO DIG INTO THIS A LITTLE DEEPER AND MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE REALLY GETTING AT THE HEART OF THE PROBLEM AND WE'RE PROTECTING ALL PEOPLE.
REPRESENTATIVE HER.
>> THANK YOU CHAIR AND THANK
YOU FOR
THE QUESTION PERCENT OF WILL ALSO THE REASON WHY THIS IS LIMITED JUST PEACE OFFICER IS
BECAUSE MORNING. >> PUBLIC EMPLOYEES WE GIVE A
GUN TO A WEEK TELL THEM THAT
THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO TAKE
SOMEONE'S LIFE FOR WHATEVER CIRCUMSTANCE THEY MAY THEY CAN
YOU BACK ON AND SO IT IS VERY CLEAR TO US THAT THAT IS A VERY
DIFFERENT STANDARD; PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES AND OUT SHOULD
WE AT COMING TO SITUATIONS AND WITH OTHER PEOPLE'S LIVES AT
RISK IN THE SAME YOU ABSOLUTELY
SHOULDN'T JUST LIKE WE
SHOULD ACT AT PRIVATE COMPANIES
FOR NOT JUST PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S PRIVATE COMPANY IN PLACE FOR PEOPLE TO BUT WE DON'T HAVE ANY
SYSTEMS IN PLACE FOR THAT EITHER SO I THINK THAT YOU'RE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT BECAUSE WE DO
LIVE IN A SYSTEM
THE STRUCTURE AND THE COUNTRY
WAS BUILT ON AS THE STOMACH AS CRITICISM OF RACISM IN ALL OF
STRUCTURES AND ALL THE GREAT
INSTITUTIONS AND SO I BECAUSE IT IS SUCH A BIG TASK IN FRONT OF US SHOULD FOCUS AND THE
THING THAT IS AND RIGHT NOW AND THAT IS THAT THE ARBITRATION
PROCESS FOR POLICE OFFICERS AS PART AND THEY HAVE THE TIME
PUTS PEOPLE BACK INTO
JOBS SHOULD THE AIR AND 2 THERE ARE DIRE CONSEQUENCES TO WHEN THOSE OFFICERS STAND JOB SO I APPRECIATE YOUR QUESTION AND I
THINK THAT ONE FOR US TO PONDER I BUT THAT IS NOT WHAT IS THE PRESS NOW AND SO AND THAT'S WHY
WE HAVE MONEY TO.
>> THANK YOU REPRESENTATIVE
HER REPRESENTATIVE OF ALL THE
>> MISTER CHAIR; I GUESS THE QUESTION TO REPRESENTATIVE
LET'S TAKE
THE EXAMPLE; ANDRE A TEACHER AND EMOTIONALLY ABUSED A
STUDENT.
GET TO THE POINT
OF SUICIDE. NOW I'M NOT SUGGESTING THAT HAPPENS VERY OFTEN BUT IT COULD HAPPEN
THAT'S WHAT I'M SAYING IF WE'RE GOING TO DO THIS LET'S LOOK AT
THE BIRD I THINK OF WHAT WE'RE
DOING AND LET'S DO IT RIGHT.
SINCE THERE ARE OTHER CASES YOU DON'T NECESSARILY HAVE TO HAVE
A GUN IN YOUR HAND.
DISTURBED SOMEBODY OR TO HAVE THE THE WINDS TO EITHER
THEMSELVES OR OTHERS SO MY
QUESTION IS DO YOU
THINK THAT THAT THIS JUST CAN BE LIMITED TO SOMEBODY THAT'S HOLDING A GUN OR IS IT SOMEBODY
ELSE IT
COULD BE JUST AS ABUSIVE IN A DIFFERENT WAY AND THAT WE SHOULD LOOK AT THAT SYSTEM AS
WELL.
>> CHAIR AND REPRESENTED
I CAN'T ANSWER THAT QUESTION
EXCEPT FOR TO SAY THAT.
I CAN'T IMAGINE WHY GEORGE FLOYD'S FAMILY WOULD BE FEELING
RIGHT NOW SHARING
THIS CONVERSATION. AND WE'RE COMPARING THE DEATH OF A BLACK
MAN KILLED AT THE HANDS OF POLICE AND A SYSTEM THAT DOESN'T MEAN THIS ISN'T THE
FIRST TIME THIS IS HAPPEN A
SYSTEM THAT SAYS THAT IT CONTINUES TO DO THIS THE BLACK
AND BROWN AND THAT YOU WOULD
SIT HERE. HERE'S THAT A TEACHER I'M NOT SAYING THAT TEACHERS EMOTIONAL EXCEPT IT IS
NOT LOST.
I ACTUALLY WORKED IN THE SCHOOL
DISTRICT AND I DID OVERSEE WHAT THEY WERE AT TIMES WHEN THERE WERE ISSUES WITH TEACHERS WHO ARE NOT GOOD TEACHERS AND THAT
THOSE TEACHERS
WOULD BE WHAT A PERFORMANCE AT PRINCIPAL OF WEST A TEACHER'S
PERFORMANCE BY HIM AND IT WOULD BE QUITE A PLAN AND THEN IF THAT TEACHER DIDN'T END TRUE
THEY COULD SPY
THAT TEACHER AND SO THIS IS NOT AN ISSUE IN OTHER AREAS RIGHT
NOW IT BECOMES WHY WE SHOULD HAVE SO LOOK AT THAT I
WOULD JUST ASK FOR US TO THINK
THAT WE COMPARE THE LIFE OF A HUMAN E TO SOMETHING THAT WE THINK IS EQUALLY IMPORTANT AND
YET
IT'S IMPORTANT BUT I JUST THINK ABOUT WHAT IT MEANS FOR GEORGE FLOYD'S FAMILY FORCED TO WATCH
NOW TO SAY HOW WILL HIS LIFE WAS AS IMPORTANT AS POTENTIALLY THAT A TEACHER WHO
CAN GET I MIGHT BE DOING TO
A STUDENT. I WOULD JUST EXTRA STUFF THINK OF IT FROM THAT
PERSPECTIVE.
>> THANK YOU REPRESENTIVE ANY FURTHER COMMENTS REPRESENTED
BOTH.
>> WELL MISTER CHAIR AND
REPRESENTATIVE HER I WASN'T LOOKING AT RAPED; I WAS LOOKING AT WHAT WE'RE DOING
IN LEGISLATION. I'M SORRY IF I OFFENDED IT WASN'T MEANT TO OFFEND IT WAS MEANT TO LOOK AT
WE ARE DOING HERE AND MAKING SURE IF WE'RE GOING TO DO THINGS THAT
WE DO IT THE BEST
WE CAN SO IF I OFFENDED I
APOLOGIZE BUT THAT WASN'T THE INTENT INTENT WAS THAT THE LEGISLATION IN FRONT OF US AND
MAKE SURE BUT FOR THE PEOPLE IN
I THINK MISTER CHAIR THANK YOU RICK. >> SO GO GO ANY FURTHER
QUESTIONS FOR JUST FIRES OR THE
AUTHOR.
>> I CHAIR SEN DENIED IT HAD GET AN
ANSWER TO REPRESENTATIVE GET AT
THAT QUESTION ABOUT VETERANS
PREFERENCE WOULD YOU LIKE ME AS
I CAN I FOR BRODIE IS A BIT
OF SALSA. YES AND LET ME JUST
PUT A VERY QUICK AND I'M SO SORRY; I DID HAVE A CHANCE TO
ACTUALLY LOOK AT THAT AND AM.
THAT HAD THEM.
IT LOOKS AT SHOW THE BILL AT ALL FACTIONS PREFERENCE IS NOT ADDRESSED IN THIS BILL SO THAT
WHEN THE IMPACT.
SO THAT INSPECTORS WOULD NOT BE
IMPACTED.
>> SO THAT MEANS THAT THE ACTIONS PREFERENCE QUIT TO
PURSUE PROCEED. THIS
LEGISLATION.
>> FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND YES
RAPTORS.
>> MISTER CHAIR CHAIR LIKE WE LOST HER CHAIR; WE LOST THE
CHAIR. WOULD YOU LIKE TO I
DON'T.
>> I GUESS I CAN'T DO THAT I
DON'T SEE ANY
OTHER HANDS IS THERE ANY OTHER
>> I
ACTUALLY WANTED JUST TO THINK HERE AND SOME QUESTIONS; I'M
SORRY AND YOUR
OWN KITCHEN. REPRESENT THEIR
BABY IN
THE BANK.
>> YOU MADAM CHAIR; I
APPRECIATE I WAS LAST HERE PERMITTED TO JUST LIKE YOUR SON BEING I'M NOT SURE WHAT'S GOING ON HERE SO I HAVE A QUESTION
FOR THE AUTHOR OF THE BILL WHAT'S THE DEFINITION OF PEACE
OFFICERS.
>> I WOULD THINK IT DOES SAY
THAT HAPPENED.
>> THAT AIR RETURN.
THE CHAIR THAT TURNED OUT.
REPRESENTATIVE HER.
>> SO
IT'S DEFINITION FOR PEACE OFFICER AND TESTIFYING UNDER
SECTION 6.26 A
4 TO 6.26. YES; SO IT'S IT'S A
SPECIFIC TYPE OF LICENSE
TRESTLE. THE BASE
OFFICERS SHERIFFS ANYBODY THAT WOULD BE CONSIDERED IN ATLANTA WHERE I ACTUALLY HAVE A
SPECIFIC PART OF
THAT TIME THAT STATUE IN FRONT OF ME; BUT THERE IS ALREADY A
DEFINITION THAT STATUTE.
>> THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR;
WELL; I'M SORRY THAT WAS NOT ADEQUATE FOR I APOLOGIZE; I'M NOT INTERESTED IN WHAT THE
STATUTE NUMBERS ARE WHERE I'M ACTUALLY INTERESTED IN
SPECIFICALLY WHO'S GOING TO BE A ACTED BY THE BILL AND IT WOULD SEEM TO ME THAT THE
AUTHOR OF THE BILL. YOU KNOW SPECIFICALLY WHO IS GOING TO BE
IMPACTED BY THIS.
TO OFFER THE BILL
AGAIN I WOULD ASK YOU TO TELL ME SPECIFICALLY WHICH PEACE
OFFICERS WOULD BE IMPACTED BY THE BILL.
>> SURE IF YOU GET OUT.
I SAW IT ACTUALLY IS
QUITE LONG ON THERE ARE A NUMBER OF PROVISIONS UNDER THIS UP HE SAID WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO REACH OF THE ENTIRE THING WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO SEND YOU A LINK
TO THE DEATH BECAUSE SHE.
SO YOU CAN READ.
AN EMPLOYEE OR AN ELECTED OR
APPOINTED OFFICIAL CLINICAL SUBDIVISION A LAW ENFORCEMENT
AGENCY WHO WAS LICENSED BY
THE BOARD CHARGED WITH THE PREVENTION AND DETECTION OF CRIME AND THE ENFORCEMENT OF
THE GENERAL CRIMINAL LAWS OF THE STATE AND WHO HAS THE FULL POWER OF REPRESSED AND SHELL ALSO INCLUDE MINNESOTA STATE
PATROL AGENTS
OF THE IT'S NOT A CAMPING ENFORCEMENT STATE CONSERVATION
OFFICERS METROPOLITAN TRANSIT
POLICE OFFICERS. I'M IN A
CORRECTIONS FUGITIVE APPREHENSION UNIT OFFICERS AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE FRAUD
BUREAU; YOU'RE
NOT OFFICERS. AND STATE QUITE
QUITE YEARS OF A VIOLENT CRIME QUITTING COUNCIL AND A PEACE OFFICER WHO WAS EMPLOYED BY LAW
ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
OF A FEDERALLY. I STRIKE HAS
DEFIED UNITED STATES COAL 25 SECTION QUEST IF THE B E AND
WAS LICENSED BY THE COURT.
HIGH TIME PEACE OFFICERS MEAN
AN INDIVIDUAL LICENSE BY THE BOARD TO SERVICES ARE UTILIZED
BY LIFE FORCE
THE AGENCIES. NO MORE AN AVERAGE OF 20 HOURS PER WEEK
NOT INCLUDING TIME SPENT I CALL WHEN NO CALL OR ACTIVE DUTY IS
RECEIVED.
CALCULATED ON AN ANNUAL BASIS
WITH EITHER FULL POWERS OF ARREST BUT I STATION TO CARRY A
FIREARM WHILE ON ACTIVE DUTY.
THE TERM SHOW UP EVEN THOUGH THE INDIVIDUAL RECEIVES NO COMPENSATION FOR TIME SPENT ON
ACTIVE DUTY.
AND SHOW YOU A PERSPECTIVE OF THE TITLE CONFERRED UPON THE
INDIVIDUAL BY ANY LAW
ENFORCEMENT AGENCY OFFICE I
RESERVE OFFICER MEANS INDIVIDUAL COUP SERVICE UTILIZED BY OUTLINES AGENCY TO PROVIDE SUPPLEMENTARY
ASSISTANCE; ESPECIALLY BANKS;
TRAFFIC OR HOW
CROWD CONTROL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE CLERICAL ASSISTANTS AND SHALL INCLUDE
RESERVE DEPUTIES SPECIAL
DEPUTIES MOUNTED I'M NOT ONE TO
PATROLS AND ALL OF THE
EMPLOYEES OR VOLUNTEERS
PERFORMING RESERVE OFFICE FUNCTIONS RESERVE OFFICERS DOING A 10 NOT INCLUDING FORSMAN GENERAL CRIMINAL LAWS
OF THE STATE AND THE OFFICER DOES NOT HAVE THE FULL POWERS OF ARREST OR OPPOSITION TO
CARRY A FIREARM
ON DUTY BECAUSE ON FOR A LITTLE BIT LONGER WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO
FINISH READING HERE. >> I'M CURIOUS TO KNOW IF THAT INCLUDES A BEAR CRIMINAL
APPREHENSION.
>> FROM WHAT I AND I FROM WHAT
I THE PERSON YOU SPECIFICALLY REFERRING TO SPECIFIC
INDIVIDUALS BUT THEN THAT BUREAU BECAUSE I MEAN NOT
EVERYBODY IN THAT.
>> OIL FALLS UNDER THESE CATEGORIES; MISTER CHAIR; MAYBE THIS IS SOMETHING HOST
RESEARCH COULD HELP WITH.
>> THAT WOULD BE TERRIFIC.
THANK FLYING BLIND HERE ON IDENTIFY YOURSELF WHEN YOU
SPEAK WITH.
>> MISTER CHAIR AND MEMBER MARC
JAMES FOR HEALTH RESEARCH.
BE RICH AND I KNOW IT IS
6.8 HER. WAS YOUR FRIEND YOU I
IMMEDIATELY AND LOOKING AT
WE CANNOT SEE THE EURO CRIMINAL
APPREHENSION DIRECTORY. HURT
YOU I DO NOT KNOW FOR SURE WHETHER OR NOT TO FLY TO DC AND
SO I CAN. CALI CREW AND A PEACE
OFFICER.
BILL MISTER CHAIR.
>> THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR IS GO TO THE AUTHOR OF THE BILL WAS IT YOUR INTENTION TO INCLUDE
THE BCA.
>> MISTER CHAIR;
I GUESS I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION
BECAUSE NOT EVERYBODY WHO WORKS
FOR THE
CURE ACTUALLY IS A PEACE OFFICER SO CAN SO CAN I JUST GET CLARIFICATION AND YOU
WONDER YOU EVERYBODY IN
THE BUREAU IS INCLUDED IN THIS
OR JUST PEOPLE WHO ARE UNDER THE CATEGORY WHICH I READ THE DEFINITIONS OF HOW THEY
CERTIFIED
AND WHO AS A FIRE ARM IS TO ARE YOU READY TO EVERYBODY WHO
WORKS AT IT. MISTER CHAIR.
>> THANK YOU
MISTER CHAIR KNOW IT'S IT'S NOT WHAT MY QUESTION IS WHAT IS
YOUR INTENTION REPRESENTATIVE HER I WANT TO KNOW WHAT YOUR INTENTION IS WITH REGARDS TO
BCA.
>> MY INTENTION THAT
BY START THANK YOU CHAIR AT THE PRISON TO BE MY INTENTION IS THAT ANYBODY WHO FALL UNDER THE
DEFINITION OF A
PEACE OFFICER; WHICH MEANS A SOMEBODY HERE VERY SPECIFICALLY
THERE SPEAKING ABOUT HOW THEY'RE CERTIFIED AND AND
WHETHER THEY CARRY A FAR FIREARM IF THEY FALL UNDER THESE CATEGORIES AND THEY WOULD
PICK UP. NOW I CAN GET A MUCH
DETAIL
IN PERSON AND I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO ASK ME BECAUSE I'M ANY PLACE WHERE THE EURO AND SO LIKE I SAID I DON'T WANT
TO
ANSWER QUESTION THAT DOES SEEM TO BE CLEAR TO BE CLEAR THE SCOPE OF YOU'RE ASKING ME
ABOUT.
>> THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR SANTA
FE AND OKAY; SO. >> HERE'S THE PROBLEM THAT I HAVE WITH YOU KNOW WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THIS
>> AND WITH REGARD TO A LOT
OF THINGS IT'S REALLY VERY
DIFFICULT TO VOTE ON BILLS LIKE
THEIRS WHEN WE DON'T KNOW THE DETAILS AND WE'RE NOT MEETING IN PERSON WE DON'T KNOW WHAT'S
GOING ON. >> GUARD TO THE DETAILS ALL OF
STUFF THAT'S IN HERE.
>> WELL.
>> AND TO THE CHIEF TWICE AND JUST CAN NOT JUST IN CITIES
FROM NORTHERN MINNESOTA;
GALLIANO IS THE NORTH OF HIGHWAY TO OR SOUTH OF HIGHWAY
TO I'M NOT SURE SAW. I'M JUST
TEASING LITTLE
YOU KNOW GUYS
I LISTEN. I'M A TREMENDOUS SUPPORTER OF LAW ENFORCEMENT
AND YOU CAN ASK ANYBODY IN MY DISTRICT I REPRESENT THE CHIEFS AND THE SHARE AND SO FORTH YOU CAN TALK TO COLONEL ANGER IN
THE GUISE OF THE STATE PATROL. MY CONCERN IS IS
THAT.
YOU KNOW THAT KNOW ME INFERENCE
IS THAT THIS IS A STATEWIDE PROBLEM UNREPRESENTED HER DOCTOR SAID THAT THIS IS NOT IN
MINNEAPOLIS STATEWIDE ALTHOUGH
MISTER JEFF QUITE I'VE NOT
HEARD A WORD FROM ME SINGLE.
SHE'S OR SHARE IN THE DISTRICT
THAT I I FAIL TO
SEE HOW THIS IS GOING TO BE BENEFICIAL IN A PLACE LIKE OKAY
FOR
YOU LIVE OR IN ROTUNDA WHERE I LIVE OR AND INTERNATIONAL FALLS
TO REPRESENT HIM BACK IN.
I JUST I DON'T GET IT AND.
35 YEAR TEACHING AND COACHING;
I WAS
WORK EURO ZONE MEMBER TO HER I
WOULD ASK YOU THIS
I'VE NEGOTIATED AS A AS THE CHIEF NEGOTIATOR FOR THE TEACHERS AND ROSE GARDEN AGO
SHE DID A NUMBER THE CONTRACT. CAN YOU TELL ME HOW MANY CONTRACTS YOU AGO SHARED IN THE
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING SETTING
FOR EMPLOYEES.
>> THANK YOU CHAIR; SENDING AND THANK YOU I THANK YOU FOR THAT QUESTION I ACTUALLY CAME INTO THE SAINT PAUL SCHOOL DISTRICT
IS HUGE STRIKE TRAIN. SAINT PAUL SCHOOL
DISTRICT AND THE
TEACHERS UNION AND I KNEW WHAT THAT WAS SELECTED AND SO I
ACTUALLY WORKED A FEW TIMES A
YEAR PROCESS WORKING I HAVE
WITH PEOPLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
AND I YEAH I DURING THAT TIME DURING THAT CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS I HAVE NOT HAD A
LOT OF THEM. I HAVE HAD
EXPERIENCED GOING AT.
>> THANK THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR
I
I REALLY STRUGGLE WITH IT; BUT
THE CONCEPT OF
I DON'T LIKE THE FACT THAT WE
ARE GOING TO APPEAR AND TO ME
TARGETING
POLICE OFFICE IN THIS
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING PROCESS AND IN THIS ARBITRATION PROCESS
AND I DON'T LIKE THAT.
I THINK THAT IF WE'RE GOING TO
OPEN
UP THIS. SITUATION WE REALLY NEED TO TAKE A LOOK AT IT AND
DOING IT BEFORE AND SIZE ONE SIZE FITS ALL AND WE SHOULD BE
DOING IT. ARBITRATION HIGH SITUATIONS I WOULD ASK TO ME.
AUTHOR OF
THE BILL. WHY ARE REDUCING THE NUMBER FROM 25 AND YOU SAID IN
YOUR
OPENING COMMENT. 26; BUT I THINK YOU MET 6 IS THAT NOT
CORRECT.
>> AND EVEN PERCENT PP AND WE
ORIGINALLY IT'S 25 BUT WE ARE ACTUALLY REDUCING THAT NUMBER TO IF I CAN SAY THAT EARLIER THAT WAS MY NIECE THOUGH THAT'S ACTUALLY WHAT WOULD YOU USE.
WELL AS A DIVISION.
>> THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR AND STILL REPRESENTING HER WHY ARE
YOU HAVING THE GOVERNOR.
6 WHY NOT THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF
THE SUPREME COURT.
AS
AN EXAMPLE.
>> A PRISON ESCAPEE AND WE DID
LOOK AT THAT AND LJ DOES NOT HAVE THAT TYPE OF WITH BE WHEN
WE
GOT OFF THIS IS THE FINAL
PROCESS AND THEN ALL OF THIS AMY WILENTZ FOR SOMEBODYS QUALIFICATIONS AS
WELL AT THE FOLLOWING
ORDER TO APPOINT SOMEBODY AND
THAT OUR GOVERNOR'S PUBLIC PROCESS. IT'S GENERALLY A VERY
FAIR PROCESS AND BROUGHT PROCESS AND THAT IT
DOESN'T REACH COMMUNITY MEMBERS
AND PEOPLE WITH THE AREAS THAT MAY NOT GENERALLY SEE AND SO WE LOOK AT THAT AS WELL BUT WE
THOUGHT THIS WAS BEST FOR US.
>> REPRESENTATIVE IN A FURTHER.
HEARING FOR THE REPRESENTATIVE
EVEN.
I'M NOT SURE WHAT'S GOING ON
HERE.
>> AND AGAIN I I I STRUGGLE WITH THAT I THINK THAT WE
SHOULD
A MORE BALANCED WAY OF APPOINTING THAT'S WHAT WE'RE
GOING TO DO.
IT SAYS IN THE BUILT SOMETHING
ABOUT IN CONSULTATION WITH
THE STATE. >> OWNERS WHO ARE STAKEHOLDERS
IN THIS PROCESS
REPRESENTATIVE HER. >> CHAIR SENDING OUR PERCENT BABY CAN YOU ACT DIRECTLY TO A SPECIFIC SECTION YOU'RE LOOKING
AT SPECIAL.
>> STORY.
OLD ENOUGH PERCENT OF BABY IN >> AMERICA LOOK HERE WELL I'M
GOING TO ASK
ONE MORE THE QUESTION WILL
RETURN TO HER I YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPENED IN MINNEAPOLIS IS A HORRIBLE HORRIBLE HORRIBLE
TRAGEDY. I THINK UNIVERSALLY
PEOPLE AGREE TO THAT.
ALL YOU TALK ABOUT THE SYSTEMIC RACISM THAT EXISTS IN ALL
INSTITUTIONS.
AND AGAIN I REALLY DON'T LOOK
AT TO REPRESENT HER WITH ALL
DUE RESPECT CAN CAN YOU POINT OUT FOR ME AND PEOPLE RECALLS
OR SOMEPLACE LIKE THAT WHERE THE INSTITUTIONAL
RACISM IN MANIFESTING ITSELF.
>> O ONE REPRESENTATIVE HER.
>> CHAIR SUNDAY FABIAN.
I WOULD SUGGEST THAT MAYBE YOU
AND I HAVE A CONVERSATION
ANOTHER TIME REGARDING THAT HUGE TOPIC. I LIKE MANY MANY
THINGS IN A
SYSTEMIC RACISM. I MISS YOU EXPERIENCE IT YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BE THE SCENE OF A SECOND
HELPING OUT FOR YOU. I WOULD PREFER FOR US TO MAYBE HAVE IT
BE A PRIVATE CONVERSATION BETWEEN YES BECAUSE THAT MEANS
IT TELLS
ME THAT RIGHT NOW THE REAL QUESTION WAS ASKED OF HIS VERY LITTLE UNDERSTANDING OF
PRIVILEGE
AND POWER. I UNDERSTANDING OF THE HISTORICAL NATURE COUNTRY IN THE WATER. WE HAVE PUT INTO
PLACE
TO EXCLUDE PEOPLE OF COLOR. IT TELLS ME THAT THERE IS NO
FOUNDATION FOR THE I
D F HOW THIS LAND WAS TAKEN TO THE PEOPLE WERE KILLED AND THE
PEOPLE THAT THE LAND WAS THAT
ONE FROM AND SO I'M SORRY BUT I
CAN'T GIVE YOU AN ANSWER TODAY THAT QUESTION DURING THIS TIME BECAUSE IT IS A MUCH BIGGER
CONVERSATION CHECK OUT.
>> THANK YOU REPRESENTIVE HER REPRESENTED FABIAN. >> ALASKA SHE WOULD GO BACK TO
AND I APOLOGIZE TO LEAVE A PERSON WHO IS TESTIFYING ON BEHALF OF THE
LEAGUE CITIES
>> THIS BILL ON BOARD.
>> YES; GOOD.
>> TALK TO THE LEAGUE OF I'M
CURIOUS TO KNOW.
IT MISSES THIS IS A BITE OUT OF
APPLE IF WE DO WHAT ARE YOUR
INTENT GOING FORWARD IN TERMS.
FOLLOWING UP WITH SOMETHING. AGO TO A
BROADER I AND ALSO THEN BACK TO
THE AUTHOR TO. I THINK WE'RE GOING TO DO
SOMETHING LIKE THIS.
>> WE WE NEED TO GET AWAY
FROM ME.
>> APPEARANCE LIKE I SAID
EARLIER OF ALL TARGETING PLEASE I GO BACK TO WHAT WE'RE BEING
DETTMER SAID I BELIEVE IT WAS
HIM BUT OTHER EMPLOYEES WHO.
>> SHOULD POSSIBLY BE AND THEN YOU SHOULD HAVE A HEARING ON
THAT MISTER CHAIR. WHY WOULDN'T
WE DO THAT WHY
WOULDN'T WE. HAVE MORE PEOPLE INVOLVED MORE EMPLOYEES BROUGHT INTO THIS CELL TO THIS UMBRELLA IF THIS IS WHAT WE'RE GOING TO
DO. SOAP BACK IN THE LEAGUE AND THE
AUTHOR WHY ARE WE NOT.
TAKING A LOOK AT THIS IN A
BROADER PICTURE AND I APPRECIATE WHAT GOING ON IN TODAY'S WORLD OK; LET'S ALL
AGREE TO THAT. BUT IF WE'RE GOING TO DO THIS NOW MIGHT BE THE TIME
TO ACTUALLY TAKE SOME BOLD STEPS.
>> IN TERMS OF
>> I BELIEVE DIRECTED TOWARDS CALLED SERVE BEATING OH WOULD YOU LIKE TO
DRIVE. YEAH; THIS IS IT.
>> BELIEVES POLICY ACTUALLY
IS A. >> YEAH OR SO YEARS IS A
STANDARD OF
LIVING ARTS. AND IT DOES EXPAND TO THE GROSS MISCONDUCT AND YOU
KNOW SOME.
>> HER OUT WHAT THAT
THE.
>> WELCOME THE OPPORTUNITY TO TALK THROUGH SOME ADDITIONAL
CHANGES AND REFORMS. WE WERE
VERY MUCH
INVOLVED IN THE APPELLATE PROCEEDINGS TO TRY TO BE OUR
COUNTRY
SHE AWARDS RICCI ON THE LOOSE
AND EASY. ISSUE I THINK WITH
RESPECT STANDARD REVIEW WHEN AN
AVERAGE RATING. THE DECISION
OVER TREE. IT THIS IS THE DECISION BY POLICE CHIEF OR
CITY MANAGER SO YES
IS FRIARS PARIS AND SO IS THIS
IMPORTANT IS. >> I WANT TO DO THE DICE ART
RUN.
>> PRESERVE ANY AND EVERYTHING
YES THANK YOU CHAIR.
>> REPRESENTED HER AND I WERE
TALKING EARLIER ME.
MISTAKE HOLDERS AND SO FORTH AND SHE SAID WHAT LINE
REFERRING TO I
WENT BACK AND I DID BRING UP THAT ON MY COMPUTER AS WELL SO
WHEN YOU GO TO LIKE
2.92 POINTS. >> ONE YEAR IN THE BILL THAT
HAS POPULATION
TO IMMUNITY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT
BIG
SHOWING THE ROSTER AND THEN OF
COURSE A CHANGE AT 2.5 TO
SO AGAIN WOULD TELL ME WHO ARE THE LAW ENFORCEMENT
STAKEHOLDERS.
>> CHAIR
17 HAVE REPRESENTED FABIAN STAKEHOLDERS OF A BROAD TERM
AND FIRST
OF ALL THIS IS TO ENSURE THAT IT IS NOT BROAD COMMUNITY
INPUT.
PARTNERS INTO THIS AND SO THE
STAKEHOLDER IS BY AND IT DOES
INCLUDE ANYBODY WHO IS MORE
LIKE THE TRADITIONAL TO OF THE STAKEHOLDER ME IS THAT IS MY COMMUNITY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT
ARE YOU KNOW. >> AND SHE WAS PARTICULARLY
IMPACTED BY ISLAM.
>> REPRESENTATIVE GROHL TO
GIVE SOMETHING. MISTER MISTER
CHAIR OF GO AND NOT
SOMETHING THAT. WELL THANK YOU
MISTER CHAIR SOLD ON AGAIN THIS
IS KIND OF A HYPOTHETICAL BUT AGAIN THE TO THE CRUX OF THE
SO WET SAY THE
ARBITRATORS ARE APPOINTED ARE THEY MISTER CHAIR AND TO THE
AUTHOR OR THEY APPOINTED.
>> A ONE-TIME BASIS FOR EACH.
THING THAT COMES FORWARD OR OR IS THAT A PERMANENT TO PUT
APPOINTMENT AS AN ARBITRATOR.
>> REPRESENTATIVE HER PLACEMENT MACK; THANK YOU CHAIR; SENDING
AND HAVE REPRESENTATIVES AT
THAT THEY CAN ASK
THE QUESTION. YES I WAS SO THIS
STILL KEEPS ALL OF THE
QUALIFICATIONS AND HOW THAT HOW
LONG THEY STAY OR IF THEIR
EVERY MOVE. >> THAT CHAPPY I HAVE EVER BEEN.
>> THERE MAY BE A
SHOE SERVICES AND ALL OF THE
RULES WITHIN THEIR EYE AREA ACTUALLY STILL OVERSEES THIS SO
WE'RE NOT TELLING THEM CHANGE
HOW THEY CRACKED THE
YEAR AFTER OUR TEACHERS ON OR
HOW LONG HOW THEY CHOOSE TO
KEEP THEM OR HOW THEY USE THEIR ROSTER BECAUSE THEY CURRENTLY HAVE A ROSTER 25 TO 60 OR
TRAITORS RIGHT NOW
WHICH THEY OVERSEE AND SO ONCE THIS GROUP IS APPOINTED THEY ARE STILL OVERSEE; BUT YOU KNOW
YOU SHOULDN'T SO
IT DOESN'T CHANGE THEIR CURRENT
RULES RIGHT NOW IT'S TRADING.
>> BUT MISTER CHAIR TOLD AND HOW ARE THE 6 CHILDREN FOR
EACH.
ACTION THAT MIGHT BE TAKING
INCIDENT.
>> THANK YOU CHAIR AT
REPRESENTATIVE FABIAN; SO
THAT IS I BET WE DO HOW
THIS IS DONE AND THE SONY ALSO ACTION ARBITRATORS IF YOU'RE
ABOUT TO THAT
SO IT'S SAYING THAT THEY WILL BE APPOINTED TO LOOK AT MY 2.2
TO BUY ASSETS ACTION THE CRASH BE BASED ON A RANDOM OR
ROTATING BASIS.
>> THANK YOU REPRESENTATIVE
HENRY A. >> SO THAT REAL QUICKLY MISTER
I THINK SO IT IS AS IF WE HAVE
IT THE ACTION HAS STARTED HOW
DOES THAT START SO WHEN WHEN
THE CHIEF TWICE OR TUSCAN.
>> STARTS THIS PROCESS.
>> WHAT IS WHERE HOW DOES THAT START IT AND HOW DOES THAT
PROCEED FORWARD.
>> KNOWN FOR THEM. >> IT WOULD START IN FACT; HERE'S I CHAIR SUNDAY PERCENT
OF AFTER A B AND IT
WOULD START THE EXACT SAME WAY
STARTS NOW DOESN'T CHANGE HOW
YOU INITIATE ALL THE CHANGES AND I WANT TO JUST BE REALLY
CLEAR ALL THIS
BILL THAT'S IT'S CHANGED THAT THERE IS A POOL OF PEOPLE THAT SPECIFICALLY LOOKS AT POLICE
MISCONDUCT.
ALTHOUGH IT DOES IT DOESN'T CHANGE THE ARBITRATION PROCESS IT DOESN'T CHANGE THOUGH
WHETHER IT WAS AN ARBITRATION.
IT JUST
CHANGES THAT WHO CREATES AND DO WELL AND THOSE INDIVIDUALS ONLY
OVERSEE POLICE I ISSUES.
>> WELL THERE'S REPRESENTATIVE IN MISTER CHAIR I I REALLY
STRUGGLE WITH THIS I I
APPRECIATE CHIEF TWICE IN AND
ASK HIM WHAT THEY'RE GOING
THROUGH. BUT I THINK ARE FOR
GOING TO DO THIS I'M CURIOUS
DID DID DID GET PACKED TERROR NOT SHARE THE
DROP WILL ASK FOR A HEARING ON
HIS BILL THAT WOULD HAVE MADE
IT 4 FOR A MORE
BROAD SCOPE OF EMPLOYEES THAT HE ASKED FOR A HEARING IN YOUR
COMMITTEE ON THIS.
YES COMEY I AM MISTER CHAIR.
THANK YOU.
>> THE IN REGARDS TO THAT.
THANK
YOU ALL PRESENT OF ALL OF YOU
AND UP TO ONE POINT.
>> YES INDEED; MISTER CHAIRMAN I THINK GOOD REPRESENTATIVE MEK
LYNN AND BERNSTEIN HAD IT IN
FIRST TIME BUT DOES LIE.
I DO HAVE ONE QUESTION OF A REPRESENTATIVE HER. YOU TOLD HIM HE HAS A QUESTION HE WAS
GOING ON HERE YOU
TOLD ME. YES; THIS WAS A SPECIFIC BECAUSE THESE PEOPLE WERE CARRYING A GUN AND
PROBABLY ELSE WAS AS YOU WENT
THROUGH THAT DEFINITE AND 4 A
PEACE OFFICER PEACE OFFICERS.
CAN YOU ASSURE
ME THAT EVERY ONE OF THOSE
IN THIS MISS BILL IS CARRYING A GUN BECAUSE THAT WAS SEEMED TO
BE THE SEPARATING
POINT BETWEEN MY SUGGESTION THAT MAYBE SOURCE OF WORKERS TO
EVER AND ARE INTERACTING
WITH PEOPLE AISH YOU BUT THAT SEEMED TO BE A QUALIFYING EVENT
AND I'M
JUST CURIOUS. IF YOU CAN I'M CONCERNED CENT INTENT HERE IS
THAT UNLESS THEY'RE CARRYING A
GUN THEY WOULD BE INCLUDED.
>> CHAIR EVEN START TO MAKE
THEIR IT'S GETTING I THANK YOU
FOR THAT QUESTION.
I'M NOT QUITE SURE WHAT I SAID THAT AND MAYBE GIVE THE
PERCEPTION THAT IS THE QUALIFYING. I HAVE A GREAT DEAL ABOUT THE DISPARITIES THAT
EXIST IN
THE HOME; YES AND HOW THE
POLICE AND WHO IS POLICE AND
TALKED A GREAT DEAL ABOUT THE INSTITUTIONAL RACISM THAT EXISTS IN THE STRUCTURES HAVE A
GREAT DEAL ABOUT THAT THE
FINANCIAL INCENTIVE ABOUT HOW WE TREAT IS A CHOICE AND I
TALKED A GREAT DEAL ABOUT ALL
OF IT PROCESS AND HOW WE GOT TO WHERE I GUESS I DON'T KNOW WHY
HAVING A GUN IS HE DEFINING
FACTOR HERE. YES; SOME TO THE FACT THAT IT WAS
OFFICERS.
GIVEN THE ABILITY TO HAVE A
HORSE AND YES THEY HAVE A BAD AND SO THEY SAY IF THERE'S A
PERCEPTION THAT GUY ONLY THING
THAT IS THE ISSUE WITH THIS WITH IT WHAT WE'RE DRESSING
HERE THEN I GUESS WE HAVE MUCH BIGGER PROBLEM TO ADDRESS THAT JUST THE FACT THAT
WE SHOULD THIS NEXT SYSTEM CONTINUE TO PUT THESE OFFICERS WHO SHOULDN'T BE ON THE JOB
BACK INTO TOWN.
>> THANK
YOU REPRESENT ROLE FOLLOWING TO MISTER MISTER CHAIR AND NEARLY
CERTAIN THAT YOU USE THAT
AS THE THE DEFINING THING THAT THEY'RE CARRYING A GUN AND THE OTHER PEOPLE I WAS TALKING
ABOUT WHAT AND SO ON.
THAT WAS MY QUESTION ONLINE ORDERS GETTING LATE IN THE CHAIR; I'M NOT GOING TO BELABOR
IT WHAT I WAS COOL.
THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU ALL THOSE UP NEXT
TO STEEN OR.
>> IT'S POSSIBLE. I THINK REPRESENT A MEK LYNN CENTRAL'S UP BEFORE MY REPRESENT AMERICAN
GO AHEAD PLEASE.
>> THANK YOU CHAIR AT SOME
PRESERVE HER. A QUESTION THAT I
HAVE IS.
BELL WHY ARE WE NOT TRYING TO
REFORM THE USE
OF FORCE BUT ONLY THE
ARBITRATION IF THAT IF THIS WHOLE THING MADE ALL KAYAK ALSO
AP AN ANONYMOUS LIKE IT.
WHY IS THERE NOTHING ABOUT LIKE
LIKE THAT RETRAINING OF USE OF
FORCE BUT ALL OF OUR TRAICION
WHICH I AGREE THAT THERE IS SOME COMPLICATIONS THERE WHICH I THINK WE'RE A LOWER POUND
PROBLEM HAS SOME IDEAS THERE.
WHY WHY WHY DO WE HAVE A CONVERSATION ABOUT AND LITERALLY THE USE OF FORCE IF YOU COULD HELP ME ANSWER THAT
QUESTION. THANK YOU.
>> REPRESENTATIVE
HER PLEASE. >> AND REPRESENTATIVE ACTUALLY THAT IS THAT IS BEING ADDRESSED
JUST NOT IN
THIS BILL; I'M NOT SURE IF YOU'RE AWARE BUT THE PAST CAUCUS HAS PUT TOGETHER A BIG
SUITE OF BILLS THAT WOULD
ATTRACT
EVERYTHING FROM HOW TO BUILD A
BEACH OR IMAGINING WHAT POLICE WOULD LIKE AND SO THAT ACTUALLY DOES EXIST AND IT IS HAPPENING AND I DON'T THINK THAT THEY'LL
BE COMING
TO YOU THE COMMITTEE BUT ALL OF
THE INFORMATION IS OUT THERE IF YOU'RE INTERESTED IN READING AT ITS USE OF FORCE THAT IS BEING
ADDRESSED RIGHT NOW. THANK YOU
ALL COME OUT.
NOW THANK YOU THAT'S THAT'S MY QUESTION. THANK YOU.
>> A VERY MATURE.
REPRESENTATIVE HARTSTEIN HAS THANK YOU MISTER CHAIR; AND I REAL QUICKLY I JUST LOOKED
RESPOND TO SOME OF THE EARLIER CONVERSATION.
>> REGARDING THE FACT THAT I DO STRONGLY BELIEVE THAT THIS IS
IN FACT A STATEWIDE ISSUE RIGHT WE HEARD YOU KNOW EARLIER TODAY
IN OUR DEBATE AND I WAS FAR AND THE BAIT A LITTLE BIT ON THE
SENATE FLOOR TODAY THAT NOW SEEMS TO BE THIS THE END OF
THIS IS JUST A MINI AK WAS
PROBLEM OR METRO PROBLEM IN TERMS OF THE RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN POLICE AND
BLACK INDIGENOUS COLOR AND I
THINK IT IS ABSOLUTELY A STATEWIDE PROBLEM TO LOOK AT NORTHWEST; MINNESOTA. WE'VE HAD
MIGRANT WORKERS
LIVING THERE FOR 4 DECADES AND
THE RED RIVER VALLEY WE'VE HAD INDIGENOUS PEOPLE IN NORTHWEST;
MINNESOTA FOR CENTURIES. AND I THINK THEIR PERSPECTIVE
ON THIS ISSUE AND THEIR
PERSPECTIVE WITH
REGARD TO THE FRIDAY OF ISSUES
INVOLVING DISCRIMINATION BY US
AND INCLUDING INTERACTIONS WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT; THOSE VOICES NEED TO BE HEARD AND THERE OUT
THERE
AND SO YOU KNOW TO SOMEHOW SUGGEST THAT THIS IS JUST A
MINNEAPOLIS ISSUE I THINK IS NOT CORRECT AND I
JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT THAT WAS STATE
THANK YOU VERY MUCH MISTER CHAIR. >> THANK YOU REPRESENTATIVE AHERN; SEE NO REPRESENTA
FABIAN.
>> THANK YOU MISTER WELL.
THE PRESIDENT OF COURSE YOU
KNOW LIKE YOU A LOT AND I THINK
THAT HERE MISCHARACTERIZING WHAT'S GOING ON IN NORTHWEST MINNESOTA. BUT YOU AND I CAN HAVE A CONVERSATION AND OVER
TIME.
ABOUT MISTER
AND SATURDAY JUNE GUY ASK YOU ABOUT
THE GROTTO BILL WAS FILED 14.
SATURDAY JUNE 1430 INTO AN EMAIL WAS SENT TO MISTER REIS TRAVIS
REASON MICHAEL MOORE. REQUESTING A
HEARING ON HOW
STYLE OR TEEN IN LABOR COMMITTEE SO I JUST WANT TO GET
THAT ON THE RECORD THAT
THAT WAS THERE I WOULD THINK IT WOULD BE A GOOD IDEA FOR YOU
MISTER TO
DO THAT TO HAVE A HEARING
REPRESENTATIVE ROB LOWES BILL.
SO THAT PEOPLE CAN HEAR WHAT THE DIFFERENCES ARE BETWEEN
WHAT WE'RE HEARING TODAY.
ON HER BILL AND AND AND THE
HOUSE 14.
>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH TO LOOK INTO THAT APPRECIATE YOUR
COMMENTS.
REPRESENTATIVE KAY ALL IN
MISTER CHAIR; I'M
>> I JUST WANTED TO SAYING THAT
REPRESENTATIVE PER
HER AMAZING. I DON'T THINK I COULD HAVE DONE WHAT YOU HAVE
DONE WITH
CLASS AND.
>> I ALSO WANT TO
SAY THAT. REPRESENT A BABY AND I CAN UNDERSTAND WHY I DON'T
THINK THAT THERE IS SYSTEMIC RACISM BECAUSE YOU LIVE IN AN
AREA THAT'S 98% WHITE YOU PROBABLY DON'T HAVE VERY MANY NEIGHBORS OR FRIENDS THAT TEND
TO
BE PEOPLE SO I WOULD DEFINITELY
SUGGEST MAYBE YOU KNOW COMING DOWN AND HAVING THOSE
CONVERSATIONS WALKING IN THE NAME; THERE WAS A POLL ON WHERE
THESE PEOPLE LIVE TO SEE WHAT'S
REALLY GOING ON. AND THEN I
ALSO WANTED TO ASK.
TO WISE WHO IS A CHIEF OF AN
ONE OF THE CITIES THAT I
REPRESENT THIS HER MISSION IS
SUPPORTED BY THE
HE WAS SHE WAS ASSOCIATION
CRACKED.
JUST KEEP OF
>> THANK YOU; MISTER
CHAIR REPRESENTATIVE CAGLE THE
MESSAGE CHIEFS OF POLICE
ASSOCIATION
HAS FORMALLY. I'M MOVING FORWARD WITH A RECOMMENDATION THAT ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES.
HANDLE DISCIPLINE ARBITRATIONS.
4 POLICE OFFICERS. THE REAL PURPOSE IS THE SAME
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES ARE
FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES THAT MAKE DECISIONS. THEY'RE NOT PEOPLE WHO ARE CONTRACTORS THAT
ARE PAID OR BEING ASSIGNED A
PARTICULAR ARBITRATION. YEAH;
THERE'S COMPETING INTERESTS
THAT ARE. IN AROUND STATE GOVERNMENT HAS PROPOSALS RIGHT NOW AND FRANKLY I'M JUST
ANXIOUS FOR SOMETHING TO MOVE
FORWARD. SO THAT DISCIPLINE DECISIONS ARE MADE MORE BY
POLICE CHIEFS AND LAST A
V A 5050 PROPOSITION OF ARBITRATORS WHO DON'T LIVE IN THE COMMUNITIES THAT WE WORK
OUT. THANK YOU AND MAKE IT TO OTHERS
AND OF KALE MR.
>> AND CHIEF WHY
>> HOW STATE ON
>> CHIEFS OF POLICE ARE PART OF
THAT ORGANIZATION.
MY I LOOKED ON THE WEB SITE I
COULDN'T FIND MY ROSTER. >> A REPRESENTATIVE I THINK
IT'S SOMETHING AROUND
400 POLICE CHIEFS. THROUGHOUT
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA; BUT AGAIN IT'S THIS PARTICULAR ITEM
HAS BEEN TALKED ABOUT
FOR YEARS. >> THE IDEA THAT THAT.
>> A LOCAL
POLICE CHIEF HAS MORE TO SAY
ABOUT A
TERMINATION AND PARTICULAR THEN AN ARBITRATOR WHO MIGHT FLY IN
FROM
ANOTHER STATE HEAR A CASE MAKE A DECISION AND THEN FLY HOME TO
WHEREVER IT IS THAT THEY CAME FROM ESSENCE THAT'S WHAT THIS IS ABOUT AND WHAT WE'RE
LOOKING FOR.
THANK
>> OR THE TIME IS GROWING SHORT AND WE HAVE TO GO THROUGH A
COUPLE RULE CARRIED SYRIA SO.
>> THE DAUGHTER. THANK YOU
MISTER CHAIR I APPRECIATE THAT I THINK IT WAS CHEAP WEISS IT
WAS JUST TALKING IS THAT
CORRECT THAT'S CORRECT OKAY; SO WHAT YOU WHY SO AGAIN I RESPECT
YOU GREATLY AND I AGREE WITH YOU THAT THE TEAM SHOULD BE
MAKING MORE DECISIONS. AND USES
I ALSO AGREE THAT
THE PRINCIPLES AND SUPERINTENDENTS I HAD A FORMER
SCHOOLTEACHER NOT AN ADMINISTRATOR PRINCIPALS AND SUPERINTENDENTS SHOULD BE
MAKING MORE DECISIONS. AND I
THINK THAT THAT THIS
CONVERSATION THIS EVENING. ACTUALLY STARTS A PROCESS TO
WHERE WE CAN GET TO A BETTER PLACE ACROSS THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
AND EVERY BIT OF CABLE I WOULD
ASK YOU WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME
YOU 3 OR 4 NIGHTS IN A ROLE IN
THE TOWN
400 PEOPLE OR A CITY MORE THAN
A 150 MILES FROM THE CAPITAL. >> REPRESENTATIVE BABY AND
MISTER CHAIR LAST WEEK.
>> THANK YOU SPECIALLY THE CHIEFS ARE FOR THEIR VALUABLE
INPUT.
SEE
HANDS UP. >> I'M GOING TO RENEW MY MOTION
THAT CALLS FOR ALSO NEED TO
AS AMENDED. >> BE REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS HOLES AND
STROKE A RENEWAL ROLL CALL ON
THIS.
PAUL SMITH SO TAKE THE ROLE.
HERE'S SUNDAY AND I.
REPRESENTATIVE CANDLE.
REPRESENTATIVE VOCAL.
REPRESENTATIVE BRAND.
REPRESENTATIVE DENVER.
REPRESENTATIVE ACKERMAN.
REPRESENTATIVE FABIAN.
REPRESENTATIVE FOR UNSEEN I.
REPRESENTATIVE ROBERT.
REPRESENTATIVE MACK ONE.
REPRESENTATIVE
NELSON AM.
J PRESENTED NELSON END.
REPRESENTATIVE PURCELL
REPRESENTATIVE CLASS AND DOGS
AND MISS YOU. HAHA.
I AND ICE.
OKAY THE MOTION FOR RAILS.
THERE ARE 2 OTHER.
ISSUES TO TAKE UP A RULE CALLED
FOR ON THE SCENE IN
ALL DISCUSSION ALREADY.
THE CLERK WILL TAKE TO ROLL ON
THE STEVENSON ALSO FILE BILL.
REPRESENTATIVE SUNDAY I AND
REPRESENTATIVE CAGLE.
REPRESENTATIVE VOGEL.
REPRESENTATIVE BRAND I
REPRESENTATIVE CLASSEN.
REPRESENTATIVE DENVER.
REPRESENTATIVE ACKERMAN.
REPRESENTATIVE FABIAN.
REPRESENTATIVE FOR UNSEEN I
REPRESENTATIVE LIVER I
REPRESENTATIVE MACK LAND.
REPRESENTATIVE NELSON AM.
REPRESENTATIVE NELSON AND I
REPRESENT IN PURCELL.
REPRESENTATIVE JOHN.
IT'S 59 0 BOUNCE.
CERTAINLY SO THE MOTION
WE ALSO.
>> ROLL CALL BORDER QUESTIONED OFFER SOME FALL THE BILL
PRESENTED BY REPRESENTATIVE TAB KEY.
>> KIRK WILL TAKE
THE ROLE. >> REPRESENTATIVE SOMETHING I
REPRESENTATIVE GAGGLE I REPRESENTATIVE VOCAL. >> I.
>> REPRESENTATIVE BRAND.
REPRESENTATIVE CLASSROOM.
REPRESENTATIVE DETTMER.
REPRESENTATIVE EKLUND I
REPRESENTATIVE FABIAN.
REPRESENTATIVE FOR UNSEEN.
I REPRESENTATIVE LIPPERT.
REPRESENTATIVE MACK LAND.
REPRESENTATIVE NELSON AM I REPRESENT AN REPRESENTATIVE
NELSON AN. REPRESENTATIVE
PURCELL.
REPRESENTATIVE JOB.
15 EYES AND 0 MOUSE; THANK YOU.
THE MOTION PREVAILS AND.
>> SEE NO OTHER BUSINESS BEFORE
THE COMMITTEE OR CALL FOR AFTER WE WISH BOB DETMER
GOODELL'S.
>> WE ARE ADJOURNED; THANK YOU
CAME AT A BAD.
