HOSPITAL WITHIN 30 MILES OF A
CLINIC AND WHAT’S INTERESTING IS
CLINIC AND WHAT’S INTERESTING IS
THE REACTION FROM THE SENATE
THE REACTION FROM THE SENATE
MINORITY LEADER CHUCK SCHUMER
MINORITY LEADER CHUCK SCHUMER
WHICH A LOT OF PEOPLE SAY IS
WHICH A LOT OF PEOPLE SAY IS
OVER THE LINE, AND LET’S BRING
OVER THE LINE, AND LET’S BRING
IN NEWT GINGRICH, FOX NEWS
IN NEWT GINGRICH, FOX NEWS
CONTRIBUTOR FORMER SPEAKER OF
CONTRIBUTOR FORMER SPEAKER OF
THE HOUSE.
THE HOUSE.
HE JOINS US GOOD MORNING TO YOU.
HE JOINS US GOOD MORNING TO YOU.
>>  GOOD MORNING.
>>  GOOD MORNING.
OVER THE LINE IS PROBABLY TOO
OVER THE LINE IS PROBABLY TOO
MILD.
MILD.
STEVE: YOU’LL PROBABLY RIGHT
STEVE: YOU’LL PROBABLY RIGHT
YOU’LL PLAY THE SOUND BITE AND
YOU’LL PLAY THE SOUND BITE AND
THEN GET YOUR COMMENTS.
THEN GET YOUR COMMENTS.
>>  ALL RIGHT >>  REPUBLICAN
>>  ALL RIGHT >>  REPUBLICAN
LEGISLATURES ARE WAGING A WAR ON
LEGISLATURES ARE WAGING A WAR ON
WOMEN.
WOMEN.
ALL WOMEN.
ALL WOMEN.
>>  [APPLAUSE]
>>  [APPLAUSE]
>>  AND YOU’RE TAKING AWAY
>>  AND YOU’RE TAKING AWAY
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS.
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS.
I WANT TO TELL YOU, GORSUCH, I
I WANT TO TELL YOU, GORSUCH, I
WANT TO TELL YOU, KAVANAUGH, YOU
WANT TO TELL YOU, KAVANAUGH, YOU
HAVE RELEASED THE WHIRLWIND AND
HAVE RELEASED THE WHIRLWIND AND
YOU WILL PAY THE PRICE.
YOU WILL PAY THE PRICE.
>>  [APPLAUSE]
>>  [APPLAUSE]
>>  YOU WON’T KNOW WHAT HIT YOU
>>  YOU WON’T KNOW WHAT HIT YOU
IF YOU GO FOR  FOR WARD WITH
IF YOU GO FOR  FOR WARD WITH
THESE AWFUL DECISIONS.
THESE AWFUL DECISIONS.
STEVE: IT SOUNDED LIKE MR.
STEVE: IT SOUNDED LIKE MR.
SCHUMER WAS THREATENING TWO
SCHUMER WAS THREATENING TWO
SUPREME COURT JUSTICES.
SUPREME COURT JUSTICES.
>>  WELL OF COURSE HE WAS.
>>  WELL OF COURSE HE WAS.
LOOK HE WAS IN FRONT OF A CROWD.
LOOK HE WAS IN FRONT OF A CROWD.
THEY WERE FENATICLY COMMITTED TO
THEY WERE FENATICLY COMMITTED TO
THE MAXIMUM OPPORTUNITY TO KILL
THE MAXIMUM OPPORTUNITY TO KILL
CHILDREN, AND THEY WERE ALL REV
CHILDREN, AND THEY WERE ALL REV
VED UP, HE WAS REVVED UP AND
VED UP, HE WAS REVVED UP AND
HE GOT CARRIED AWAY AND WHAT HE
HE GOT CARRIED AWAY AND WHAT HE
SAID IS TOTALLY IRRESPONSIBLE
SAID IS TOTALLY IRRESPONSIBLE
AND DANGEROUS.
AND DANGEROUS.
AS YOU KNOW, WE LIVE IN A
AS YOU KNOW, WE LIVE IN A
COUNTRY WHERE YOU START GETTING
COUNTRY WHERE YOU START GETTING
A SENIOR POLITICIAN BY NAME,
A SENIOR POLITICIAN BY NAME,
ATTACKING SUPREME COURT JUSTICES
ATTACKING SUPREME COURT JUSTICES
, THAT’S ACTUALLY POSING
, THAT’S ACTUALLY POSING
A DANGER TO THOSE JUSTICES WHICH
A DANGER TO THOSE JUSTICES WHICH
IS WHY CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS
IS WHY CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS
SPOKE OUT SO STRONGLY, BUT I
SPOKE OUT SO STRONGLY, BUT I
THINK IT TELLS YOU THE LEVEL OF
THINK IT TELLS YOU THE LEVEL OF
PASSION THAT YOU HAVE ON THE
PASSION THAT YOU HAVE ON THE
LEFT ABOUT A WHOLE RANGE OF
LEFT ABOUT A WHOLE RANGE OF
ISSUES, BECAUSE THEY SEE THEIR
ISSUES, BECAUSE THEY SEE THEIR
WORLD STARTING TO COLLAPSE AND
WORLD STARTING TO COLLAPSE AND
THEY’RE BEGINNING TO GET MORE
THEY’RE BEGINNING TO GET MORE
AND MORE DESPERATE AND SCHUMER
AND MORE DESPERATE AND SCHUMER
YESTERDAY WAS JUST AN
YESTERDAY WAS JUST AN
ILLUSTRATION OF THAT
ILLUSTRATION OF THAT
DESPERATION.
DESPERATION.
AINSLEY: THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
AINSLEY: THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
PREACHES PRO-LIFE AND THERE WAS
PREACHES PRO-LIFE AND THERE WAS
A SIGN BEING HELD UP RIGHT NEXT
A SIGN BEING HELD UP RIGHT NEXT
TO HIM THAT SAID PROTECTING A
TO HIM THAT SAID PROTECTING A
DOG ACCESS IS A CATHOLIC VALUE.
DOG ACCESS IS A CATHOLIC VALUE.
LOOK AT THAT SIGN NEXT TO HIM.
LOOK AT THAT SIGN NEXT TO HIM.
WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS?
WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS?
>>  MY THOUGHTS ARE THAT IT’S A
>>  MY THOUGHTS ARE THAT IT’S A
FREE COUNTRY AND PEOPLE CAN
FREE COUNTRY AND PEOPLE CAN
BASICALLY MAKE UP ANYTHING YOU
BASICALLY MAKE UP ANYTHING YOU
WANT TO THAT CERTAINLY WOULD NOT
WANT TO THAT CERTAINLY WOULD NOT
BE THE POSITION OF THE CATHOLIC
BE THE POSITION OF THE CATHOLIC
CHURCH AS AN INSTITUTION.
CHURCH AS AN INSTITUTION.
IT WOULD NOT BE THE POSITION OF
IT WOULD NOT BE THE POSITION OF
ANY OF THE BISHOPS OR  CARD
ANY OF THE BISHOPS OR  CARD
CARDINALS AND IT WOULDN’T BE THE
CARDINALS AND IT WOULDN’T BE THE
POSITION OF THE POPE BUT
POSITION OF THE POPE BUT
LOOK YOU HAVE A LOT OF
LOOK YOU HAVE A LOT OF
POLITICIANS, JOE BIDEN IS ONE,
POLITICIANS, JOE BIDEN IS ONE,
NANCY PELOSI IS ANOTHER, WHO ARE
NANCY PELOSI IS ANOTHER, WHO ARE
CATHOLIC, WHO GREW UP IN THE
CATHOLIC, WHO GREW UP IN THE
CHURCH, AND WHO HAVE BECOME
CHURCH, AND WHO HAVE BECOME
PRO-ABORTION.
PRO-ABORTION.
SOME OF THEM TOK SUCH A DEGREE,
SOME OF THEM TOK SUCH A DEGREE,
THEY ARE WILLING TO KILL THE
THEY ARE WILLING TO KILL THE
BABY AFTER ITS BORN, AND
BABY AFTER ITS BORN, AND
SOMEHOW THEY JUSTIFY THAT IN
SOMEHOW THEY JUSTIFY THAT IN
THEIR MINDS AND MOST OF THE
THEIR MINDS AND MOST OF THE
COUNTRY, MOST PERSONS, DO
COUNTRY, MOST PERSONS, DO
NOT THINK THAT ABORTION IN THE
NOT THINK THAT ABORTION IN THE
7TH, EIGHTH AND 9TH MONTH OR
7TH, EIGHTH AND 9TH MONTH OR
KILLING THE BABY AFTER ITS BORN
KILLING THE BABY AFTER ITS BORN
AS THE GOVERNOR OF VIRGINIA
AS THE GOVERNOR OF VIRGINIA
ADVOCATED THEY DON’T THINK
ADVOCATED THEY DON’T THINK
THAT’S ACCEPTABLE, MORAL OR
THAT’S ACCEPTABLE, MORAL OR
LEGITIMATE AND THAT’S A REAL
LEGITIMATE AND THAT’S A REAL
CHALLENGE FOR THE DEMOCRATS
CHALLENGE FOR THE DEMOCRATS
BECAUSE THEY ARE INCREASINGLY
BECAUSE THEY ARE INCREASINGLY
FENATIC ON THIS ISSUE.
FENATIC ON THIS ISSUE.
BRIAN:  SO WHEN JUSTICE ROBERTS
BRIAN:  SO WHEN JUSTICE ROBERTS
AS YOU JUST ALLUDED TO CAME OUT
AS YOU JUST ALLUDED TO CAME OUT
AND SAID THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE WE
AND SAID THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE WE
ALMOST NEVADA HEAR THAT, JUDGE
ALMOST NEVADA HEAR THAT, JUDGE
NAPOLITANO SAYS HE NEVER SPEAKS
NAPOLITANO SAYS HE NEVER SPEAKS
OUT ABOUT ANOTHER LAWMAKERS
OUT ABOUT ANOTHER LAWMAKERS
PERCEIVED THREATS SO YOU’D
PERCEIVED THREATS SO YOU’D
EXPECT SENATOR SCHUMER TO WALK
EXPECT SENATOR SCHUMER TO WALK
BACK AND APOLOGIZE HE DIDN’T.
BACK AND APOLOGIZE HE DIDN’T.
SENATOR SCHUMERS COMMENTS WERE A
SENATOR SCHUMERS COMMENTS WERE A
REFERENCE TO THE POLITICAL PRICE
REFERENCE TO THE POLITICAL PRICE
SENATE REPUBLICANS WILL PAY, FOR
SENATE REPUBLICANS WILL PAY, FOR
PUTTING THESE JUSTICES ON
PUTTING THESE JUSTICES ON
THE COURT.
THE COURT.
NOW, I FEEL BETTER.
NOW, I FEEL BETTER.
DO THEY EVEN PUT ANY THOUGHT
DO THEY EVEN PUT ANY THOUGHT
INTO THAT?
INTO THAT?
THEY SAID JUST TO BUY THAT?
THEY SAID JUST TO BUY THAT?
YOU DON’T REFERENCE THIS TO
YOU DON’T REFERENCE THIS TO
SENATE.
SENATE.
>>  LOOK, YOU KNOW IT’S A LIE.
>>  LOOK, YOU KNOW IT’S A LIE.
I KNOW IT’S A LIE, AND VIRTUALLY
I KNOW IT’S A LIE, AND VIRTUALLY
ANY PERSON WHO PAYS ATTENTION
ANY PERSON WHO PAYS ATTENTION
KNOWS IT’S A LIE.
KNOWS IT’S A LIE.
I THINK THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
I THINK THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
HAD AN EDITORIAL POINTING OUT
HAD AN EDITORIAL POINTING OUT
THAT IT WAS AN ABSURD DEFENSE.
THAT IT WAS AN ABSURD DEFENSE.
SCHUMER MADE A MISTAKE.
SCHUMER MADE A MISTAKE.
HE SHOULD APOLOGIZE FOR IT, HE
HE SHOULD APOLOGIZE FOR IT, HE
SHOULD ADMIT IT’S TOTALLY OUT OF
SHOULD ADMIT IT’S TOTALLY OUT OF
BOUNDS AND AS I SAID IT’S
BOUNDS AND AS I SAID IT’S
DANGEROUS.
DANGEROUS.
WE LIVE IN A WORLD WHERE SOME
WE LIVE IN A WORLD WHERE SOME
FENATIC CAN LISTEN TO THAT,
FENATIC CAN LISTEN TO THAT,
DECIDE SINCE HE NAMED THE TWO
DECIDE SINCE HE NAMED THE TWO
JUSTICES BY NAME, MAYBE THEY
JUSTICES BY NAME, MAYBE THEY
SHOULD DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.
SHOULD DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.
THIS IS REALLY DANGEROUS STUFF
THIS IS REALLY DANGEROUS STUFF
AND SCHUMER OUGHT TO APOLOGIZE
AND SCHUMER OUGHT TO APOLOGIZE
AND CALL FOR A MUCH CALMER
AND CALL FOR A MUCH CALMER
OBEDIENCE TO THE LAW.
OBEDIENCE TO THE LAW.
STEVE: APPARENTLY MITCH
STEVE: APPARENTLY MITCH
MCCONNELL IS GOING TO CALL OUT
MCCONNELL IS GOING TO CALL OUT
SCHUMER LATER ON TODAY AND IT
SCHUMER LATER ON TODAY AND IT
SOUNDS LIKE MR.  HOLL Y FROM THE
SOUNDS LIKE MR.  HOLL Y FROM THE
GREAT STATE OF MISSOURI WILL
GREAT STATE OF MISSOURI WILL
INTRODUCE A RESOLUTION,
INTRODUCE A RESOLUTION,
MEANWHILE, NEWT, I’M SURE YOU
MEANWHILE, NEWT, I’M SURE YOU
WERE WATCHING ON SUPER TUESDAY
WERE WATCHING ON SUPER TUESDAY
EVENING IT WAS A STUNNING TURN
EVENING IT WAS A STUNNING TURN
AROUND FOR JOE BIDEN AS THE
AROUND FOR JOE BIDEN AS THE
DEMOCRATS RALLIED AROUND
DEMOCRATS RALLIED AROUND
HIM JUST IN THE  NICK OF TIME
HIM JUST IN THE  NICK OF TIME
AND HE WOUND UP DOING MUCH
AND HE WOUND UP DOING MUCH
BETTER THAN PEOPLE THOUGHT HE
BETTER THAN PEOPLE THOUGHT HE
WOULD DO FOUR DAYS EARLIER BUT
WOULD DO FOUR DAYS EARLIER BUT
BERNIE CALLED OUT THE MEDIA FOR
BERNIE CALLED OUT THE MEDIA FOR
RALLYING AROUND MR. BIDEN,
RALLYING AROUND MR. BIDEN,
AS WE HEAR IN THIS MONTAGE.
AS WE HEAR IN THIS MONTAGE.
>>  BUT THIS JUST CONFIRMS
>>  BUT THIS JUST CONFIRMS
EXACTLY WHAT I SAID.
EXACTLY WHAT I SAID.
WHAT THE MEDIA HAS BEEN TALKING
WHAT THE MEDIA HAS BEEN TALKING
ABOUT FOR MONTHS.
ABOUT FOR MONTHS.
HOW DO WE STOP BERNIE SANDERS?
HOW DO WE STOP BERNIE SANDERS?
HOW DO WE STOP A MOVEMENT OF
HOW DO WE STOP A MOVEMENT OF
WORKING PEOPLE AND LOW INCOME
WORKING PEOPLE AND LOW INCOME
PEOPLE?
PEOPLE?
HOW DO WE STOP A MULTI-
HOW DO WE STOP A MULTI-
GENERATIONAL, MULTI-RACIAL
GENERATIONAL, MULTI-RACIAL
MOVEMENT WHICH IS STANDING UP
MOVEMENT WHICH IS STANDING UP
FOR JUSTICE AND WHAT YOU DO IS
FOR JUSTICE AND WHAT YOU DO IS
YOU GET CANDIDATES OUT OF THE
YOU GET CANDIDATES OUT OF THE
RACE TO RALLY AROUND JOE
RACE TO RALLY AROUND JOE
BIDEN AND NOW, JOE WILL HAVE
BIDEN AND NOW, JOE WILL HAVE
BEHIND HIM, I DON’T KNOW WHAT
BEHIND HIM, I DON’T KNOW WHAT
THE FIRST I HEARD OF WHAT MAYOR
THE FIRST I HEARD OF WHAT MAYOR
BLOOMBERG MAY BE PLAYING IN HIS
BLOOMBERG MAY BE PLAYING IN HIS
ROLE BUT OBVIOUSLY AS THE NINTH
ROLE BUT OBVIOUSLY AS THE NINTH
WEALTHIEST PERSON IN THIS
WEALTHIEST PERSON IN THIS
COUNTRY HE’S WORTH SOME
COUNTRY HE’S WORTH SOME
$60 BILLION, I SUSPECT WE WILL
$60 BILLION, I SUSPECT WE WILL
SEE , YOU KNOW, A LOT OF MONEY
SEE , YOU KNOW, A LOT OF MONEY
COMING INTO BIDEN’S CAMPAIGN,
COMING INTO BIDEN’S CAMPAIGN,
PROBABLY A LOT OF NEGATIVE ADS
PROBABLY A LOT OF NEGATIVE ADS
ATTACKING HIM.
ATTACKING HIM.
STEVE: AND JOE BIDEN AND HE ARE
STEVE: AND JOE BIDEN AND HE ARE
SET TO HAVE ANOTHER DEBATE.
SET TO HAVE ANOTHER DEBATE.
IT’S GOING TO BE ON MARCH 15.
IT’S GOING TO BE ON MARCH 15.
BERNIE SANDERS SAID HE HOPES IT
BERNIE SANDERS SAID HE HOPES IT
DOESN’T TURN OUT TO BE A FOOD
DOESN’T TURN OUT TO BE A FOOD
FIGHT WITH JOE BIDEN, BUT COME
FIGHT WITH JOE BIDEN, BUT COME
ON.
ON.
THERE’S A LOT ON THE LINE, NEWT.
THERE’S A LOT ON THE LINE, NEWT.
>>  NEWT:  WELL THERE IS AND I
>>  NEWT:  WELL THERE IS AND I
THINK THAT IT’S GOING TO BE
THINK THAT IT’S GOING TO BE
INTERESTING TO SEE HOW SANDERS
INTERESTING TO SEE HOW SANDERS
TAKES ON BIDEN.
TAKES ON BIDEN.
THERE’S A SORT OF GENERAL
THERE’S A SORT OF GENERAL
AGREEMENT WITH THE DEMOCRATIC
AGREEMENT WITH THE DEMOCRATIC
PARTY THAT YOU’RE NOT ALLOWED TO
PARTY THAT YOU’RE NOT ALLOWED TO
TALK ABOUT HUNTER BIDEN, YOU’RE
TALK ABOUT HUNTER BIDEN, YOU’RE
NOT ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT MONEY
NOT ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT MONEY
FROM THE UKRAINE OR  MONEY FROM
FROM THE UKRAINE OR  MONEY FROM
CHINA, AND IN MANY WAYS, JOE
CHINA, AND IN MANY WAYS, JOE
BIDEN HAS BEEN PROTECTED BOTH BY
BIDEN HAS BEEN PROTECTED BOTH BY
THE ELITE NEWS MEDIA, AND BY HIS
THE ELITE NEWS MEDIA, AND BY HIS
FELLOW CANDIDATES, SO IT’LL BE
FELLOW CANDIDATES, SO IT’LL BE
INTERESTING TO SEE WHETHER
INTERESTING TO SEE WHETHER
SANDERS GOES DOWN THAT ROAD.
SANDERS GOES DOWN THAT ROAD.
I’M SURE THAT SANDERS IS GOING
I’M SURE THAT SANDERS IS GOING
TO TAKE BIDEN ON AS A
TO TAKE BIDEN ON AS A
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CORPORATE
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CORPORATE
DEMOCRATIC PARTY, THE INSIDER
DEMOCRATIC PARTY, THE INSIDER
PARTY, BUT THE CHALLENGE FOR
PARTY, BUT THE CHALLENGE FOR
BERNIE IS THAT THE 50 HOURS
BERNIE IS THAT THE 50 HOURS
AND I WROTE A NEWSLETTER TALKING
AND I WROTE A NEWSLETTER TALKING
ABOUT THIS 50 HOURS WHERE YOU GO
ABOUT THIS 50 HOURS WHERE YOU GO
FROM THE NIGHT BEFORE SOUTH
FROM THE NIGHT BEFORE SOUTH
CAROLINA AND PEOPLE THINKING CAN
CAROLINA AND PEOPLE THINKING CAN
BIDEN EVEN STAY IN THE RACE, AND
BIDEN EVEN STAY IN THE RACE, AND
CAN ANYBODY STOP SANDERS, 50
CAN ANYBODY STOP SANDERS, 50
HOURS LATER, BIDEN WINS SOUTH
HOURS LATER, BIDEN WINS SOUTH
CAROLINA, THE NEWS MEDIA PILES
CAROLINA, THE NEWS MEDIA PILES
ON, PETE BUTTIGIEG DROPS OUT AND
ON, PETE BUTTIGIEG DROPS OUT AND
ENDORSES HIM, KLOBUCHAR DROPS
ENDORSES HIM, KLOBUCHAR DROPS
OUT AND ENDORSES HIM, AND HE
OUT AND ENDORSES HIM, AND HE
ENDS UP CARRYING, A ROCKER
ENDS UP CARRYING, A ROCKER
ENDORSES HIM, SUDDENLY BIDEN HAS
ENDORSES HIM, SUDDENLY BIDEN HAS
THE MOMENTUM, IT TURNS OUT THAT
THE MOMENTUM, IT TURNS OUT THAT
$500 BILLION, THE $500 MILLION,
$500 BILLION, THE $500 MILLION,
A HALF BILLION, $500 MILLION
A HALF BILLION, $500 MILLION
SPENT BY BLOOMBERG PROVED THE
SPENT BY BLOOMBERG PROVED THE
OLD RULE THAT GREAT
OLD RULE THAT GREAT
ADVERTISING CAN’T SELL A BAD
ADVERTISING CAN’T SELL A BAD
PRODUCT, AND HE PROVED IN THE
PRODUCT, AND HE PROVED IN THE
TWO DEBATES THAT BLOOMBERG
TWO DEBATES THAT BLOOMBERG
WAS A TERRIBLE PRODUCT, AND SO
WAS A TERRIBLE PRODUCT, AND SO
HE CRASHES, NOW HE’S ENDORSED
HE CRASHES, NOW HE’S ENDORSED
BIDEN, AND I THINK IT’S A LITTLE
BIDEN, AND I THINK IT’S A LITTLE
HARD TO SEE AND I’M GOING TO DO
HARD TO SEE AND I’M GOING TO DO
A PODCAST THIS SUNDAY ABOUT THE
A PODCAST THIS SUNDAY ABOUT THE
RESULTS.
RESULTS.
A LITTLE HARD TO SEE RIGHT NOW
A LITTLE HARD TO SEE RIGHT NOW
HOW SANDERS DOES ANYTHING EXCEPT
HOW SANDERS DOES ANYTHING EXCEPT
BECOME SORT OF AN INSURGENT
BECOME SORT OF AN INSURGENT
CANDIDATE REPRESENTING ABOUT 40%
CANDIDATE REPRESENTING ABOUT 40%
OF THE PARTY, BUT NOT I DON’T
OF THE PARTY, BUT NOT I DON’T
SEE A ROAD FOR HIM RIGHT NOW TO
SEE A ROAD FOR HIM RIGHT NOW TO
GET BACK TO BEING THE MAJORITY,
GET BACK TO BEING THE MAJORITY,
UNLESS HE TAKES BIDEN HEAD ON
UNLESS HE TAKES BIDEN HEAD ON
AND I DON’T THINK THE SANDERS
AND I DON’T THINK THE SANDERS
INSTINCT IS TO DO THAT.
INSTINCT IS TO DO THAT.
AINSLEY: WHAT ABOUT ALL THOSE
AINSLEY: WHAT ABOUT ALL THOSE
DEMOCRATS THAT LIKE BERNIE
DEMOCRATS THAT LIKE BERNIE
SANDERS AND IF BIDEN GETS THE
SANDERS AND IF BIDEN GETS THE
NOMINATION WILL THEY SUPPORT
NOMINATION WILL THEY SUPPORT
HIM?
HIM?
>>  NEWT:  WELL, LOOK, I THINK
>>  NEWT:  WELL, LOOK, I THINK
BIDEN IS A PROFESSIONAL AND HE’S
BIDEN IS A PROFESSIONAL AND HE’S
SURROUNDED BY PROFESSIONALS.
SURROUNDED BY PROFESSIONALS.
THEY DID A GREAT JOB OF
THEY DID A GREAT JOB OF
ORCHESTRATING ALL OF THE
ORCHESTRATING ALL OF THE
ENDORSEMENTS AND REALLY MOVING
ENDORSEMENTS AND REALLY MOVING
THE SYSTEM AND 50 HOURS OR  SO.
THE SYSTEM AND 50 HOURS OR  SO.
I ASSUME THAT THEY WILL REACH
I ASSUME THAT THEY WILL REACH
OUT AND SAY, YOU KNOW, WHAT DO
OUT AND SAY, YOU KNOW, WHAT DO
YOU NEED IN THE PLATFORM?
YOU NEED IN THE PLATFORM?
AND SANDERS HAS SAID HE NEEDS
AND SANDERS HAS SAID HE NEEDS
MEDICARE FOR ALL SO BIDEN WILL
MEDICARE FOR ALL SO BIDEN WILL
HAVE A COUPLE OF BIG DECISIONS.
HAVE A COUPLE OF BIG DECISIONS.
IF, IN FACT, BIDEN AND AGAIN,
IF, IN FACT, BIDEN AND AGAIN,
THIS IS NOT OVER.
THIS IS NOT OVER.
REMEMBER, THE WORLD CHANGED IN
REMEMBER, THE WORLD CHANGED IN
THE LAST FIVE DAYS, SO LET’S NOT
THE LAST FIVE DAYS, SO LET’S NOT
ASSUME THAT WE UNDERSTAND WHAT
ASSUME THAT WE UNDERSTAND WHAT
IT’S GOING TO BE LIKE THREE
IT’S GOING TO BE LIKE THREE
MONTHS FROM NOW, BUT I THINK IF
MONTHS FROM NOW, BUT I THINK IF
BIDEN CONTINUES TO BUILD
BIDEN CONTINUES TO BUILD
MOMENTUM, HE’S THEN GOING TO BE
MOMENTUM, HE’S THEN GOING TO BE
FACED WITH A CLEAR CHOICE.
FACED WITH A CLEAR CHOICE.
DOES HE REACH TO THE LEFT TO TRY
DOES HE REACH TO THE LEFT TO TRY
TO BRING SANDERS IN AND IS THERE
TO BRING SANDERS IN AND IS THERE
ANYTHING IN THE PLATFORM OR
ANYTHING IN THE PLATFORM OR
OTHER THINGS, LET BERNIE BE THE
OTHER THINGS, LET BERNIE BE THE
KEYNOTE SPEAKER, ET CETERA,
KEYNOTE SPEAKER, ET CETERA,
IS THERE ANYTHING YOU CAN DO TO
IS THERE ANYTHING YOU CAN DO TO
BRING BERNIE IN, OR  , IN FACT,
BRING BERNIE IN, OR  , IN FACT,
DOES HE PLAY THE ROLE THAT BILL
DOES HE PLAY THE ROLE THAT BILL
CLINTON PLAYED IN 1992 AND TAKE
CLINTON PLAYED IN 1992 AND TAKE
BERNIE HEAD ON AND SAY LOOK, YOU
BERNIE HEAD ON AND SAY LOOK, YOU
KNOW, I’M A CENTRIST, I’M NOT A
KNOW, I’M A CENTRIST, I’M NOT A
LEFT WING CRAZY AND I THINK THE
LEFT WING CRAZY AND I THINK THE
COUNTRY IS GOING TO PREFER
COUNTRY IS GOING TO PREFER
ME TO TRUMP AND IN THE END,
ME TO TRUMP AND IN THE END,
BERNIE’S PEOPLE WILL ALL VOTE
BERNIE’S PEOPLE WILL ALL VOTE
FOR ME BECAUSE THE ALTERNATIVE
FOR ME BECAUSE THE ALTERNATIVE
IS TRUMP.
IS TRUMP.
AND BIDEN HAS A COUPLE OF BIG
AND BIDEN HAS A COUPLE OF BIG
DECISIONS THERE.
DECISIONS THERE.
BRIAN:  HE’S NOT A CENTRIST.
BRIAN:  HE’S NOT A CENTRIST.
HE’S EMBRACING THE NEW GREEN
HE’S EMBRACING THE NEW GREEN
DEAL AND WANTS BETO TO HEAD UP
DEAL AND WANTS BETO TO HEAD UP
THE GUN POLICY, YOU’VE NEVER
THE GUN POLICY, YOU’VE NEVER
SEEN SUCH EXTREMES IN THE SAME
SEEN SUCH EXTREMES IN THE SAME
PARTY BUT NEWT, HERE IS THE
PARTY BUT NEWT, HERE IS THE
THING GOING FORWARD I THINK
THING GOING FORWARD I THINK
WE SHOULD JUST CALL THIS AS IT
WE SHOULD JUST CALL THIS AS IT
IS.
IS.
HE’S RUN A TERRIBLE CAMPAIGN,
HE’S RUN A TERRIBLE CAMPAIGN,
HE’S TERRIBLE ON THE STUMP, HE
HE’S TERRIBLE ON THE STUMP, HE
CANNOT GET ANYONE TO A RALLY, HE
CANNOT GET ANYONE TO A RALLY, HE
CANNOT AD-LIB ANYTHING, HE CAN’T
CANNOT AD-LIB ANYTHING, HE CAN’T
GET THROUGH AN  APPEARANCE
GET THROUGH AN  APPEARANCE
WITHOUT A MAJOR MISHAP.
WITHOUT A MAJOR MISHAP.
IT’S THE SAME GUY.
IT’S THE SAME GUY.
HE DIDN’T VISIT SEVEN OF THE
HE DIDN’T VISIT SEVEN OF THE
STATES THAT HE ACTUALLY WON.
STATES THAT HE ACTUALLY WON.
THEY HAVE NOWHERE ELSE TO TURN.
THEY HAVE NOWHERE ELSE TO TURN.
>>  NEWT:  RIGHT, LOOK
>>  NEWT:  RIGHT, LOOK
EVERYTHING YOU JUST SAID, WHEN
EVERYTHING YOU JUST SAID, WHEN
HE SAID YOU’VE GOT TO GO OUT AND
HE SAID YOU’VE GOT TO GO OUT AND
VOTE ON SUPER THURSDAY, I
VOTE ON SUPER THURSDAY, I
THOUGHT THAT WAS PROBABLY ONE
THOUGHT THAT WAS PROBABLY ONE
MORE INDICATION THAT HE WASN’T
MORE INDICATION THAT HE WASN’T
ALTOGETHER IN TOUCH WITH REALITY
ALTOGETHER IN TOUCH WITH REALITY
BUT WHAT DOES IT TELL YOU, AS
BUT WHAT DOES IT TELL YOU, AS
WEAK A CANDIDATE AS BIDEN IS
WEAK A CANDIDATE AS BIDEN IS
AND HE’S ALWAYS BEEN A WEAK
AND HE’S ALWAYS BEEN A WEAK
CANDIDATE, HE HAD TO DROPOUT
CANDIDATE, HE HAD TO DROPOUT
TWICE BEFORE RUNNING FOR
TWICE BEFORE RUNNING FOR
PRESIDENT, WHAT DOES IT TELL
PRESIDENT, WHAT DOES IT TELL
YOU THAT AS WEAK AS HE IS THAT
YOU THAT AS WEAK AS HE IS THAT
THE OTHERS WERE WEAKER?
THE OTHERS WERE WEAKER?
I MEAN, THIS WAS A COLLECTION OF
I MEAN, THIS WAS A COLLECTION OF
LIKE THE MOVIE DUMB AND DUMBER.
LIKE THE MOVIE DUMB AND DUMBER.
THIS WAS WEAK AND WEAKER AND
THIS WAS WEAK AND WEAKER AND
IT’S KIND OF WEAK AND WEAKER, A
IT’S KIND OF WEAK AND WEAKER, A
WHOLE BUNCH THAT ARE WEAKER WEAK
WHOLE BUNCH THAT ARE WEAKER WEAK
ER BUT WHAT DOES IT TELL YOU
ER BUT WHAT DOES IT TELL YOU
THAT BLOOMBERG CAN SPEND
THAT BLOOMBERG CAN SPEND
$500 MILLION?
$500 MILLION?
I DON’T KNOW ABOUT YOU GUYS --
I DON’T KNOW ABOUT YOU GUYS --
AINSLEY: WHAT WAS THE PROBLEM
AINSLEY: WHAT WAS THE PROBLEM
THERE, WAS HE NOT CHARASMATIC
THERE, WAS HE NOT CHARASMATIC
ENOUGH BECAUSE REMEMBER THAT
ENOUGH BECAUSE REMEMBER THAT
DEBATE THEY PUT ALL THEIR MONEY
DEBATE THEY PUT ALL THEIR MONEY
ON BIDEN.
ON BIDEN.
>>  NEWT:  IT WASN’T THAT HE
>>  NEWT:  IT WASN’T THAT HE
WASN’T CHARASMATIC.
WASN’T CHARASMATIC.
LOOK, BLOOMBERG REALLY WAS
LOOK, BLOOMBERG REALLY WAS
LITTLE MIKE.
LITTLE MIKE.
ALL RIGHT?
ALL RIGHT?
AND TRUMP HAD IT DOWN EXACTLY
AND TRUMP HAD IT DOWN EXACTLY
RIGHT.
RIGHT.
BLOOMBERG FACED WITH THE VERY
BLOOMBERG FACED WITH THE VERY
FIRST THING IN THAT DEBATE IS
FIRST THING IN THAT DEBATE IS
WARREN GOING RIGHT AT HIM AND
WARREN GOING RIGHT AT HIM AND
HITTING HIM AS HARD AS SHE CAN
HITTING HIM AS HARD AS SHE CAN
AND HE STOOD THERE LIKE A DEER
AND HE STOOD THERE LIKE A DEER
IN THE HEADLIGHTS.
IN THE HEADLIGHTS.
IF THAT HAD BEEN TRUMP HE WOULD
IF THAT HAD BEEN TRUMP HE WOULD
HAVE TURNED AND SAID LOOK, YOU
HAVE TURNED AND SAID LOOK, YOU
LIED IN ORDER TO GET A JOB AT
LIED IN ORDER TO GET A JOB AT
HARVARD, YOU LIED OVER AND OVER,
HARVARD, YOU LIED OVER AND OVER,
DON’T YOU LECTURE ME AND BY THE
DON’T YOU LECTURE ME AND BY THE
TIME HE WAS DONE, SHE WOULD
TIME HE WAS DONE, SHE WOULD
HAVE BEEN SMALL AND HE WOULD
HAVE BEEN SMALL AND HE WOULD
HAVE BEEN BIG.
HAVE BEEN BIG.
INSTEAD, BLOOMBERG KEPT SHRINK
INSTEAD, BLOOMBERG KEPT SHRINK
ING AND PEOPLE WOULD PUNCH
ING AND PEOPLE WOULD PUNCH
HIM AND HE WOULD TAKE IT AND
HIM AND HE WOULD TAKE IT AND
LOOK LIKE HE WAS TOTALLY DAZED
LOOK LIKE HE WAS TOTALLY DAZED
AND AT THE END OF THE FIRST
AND AT THE END OF THE FIRST
DEBATE WHAT PEOPLE KNEW WAS THE
DEBATE WHAT PEOPLE KNEW WAS THE
GUY IN THE TV ADS, AND THE
GUY IN THE TV ADS, AND THE
REAL GUY ARE VERY DIFFERENT
REAL GUY ARE VERY DIFFERENT
AND AT THAT POINT BLOOMBERG
AND AT THAT POINT BLOOMBERG
BEGAN TO DISAPPEAR.
BEGAN TO DISAPPEAR.
BRIAN:  THE THING IS HE HAD TO
BRIAN:  THE THING IS HE HAD TO
RUN FROM WHAT HE DID FOR 12
RUN FROM WHAT HE DID FOR 12
YEARS AS MAYOR BECAUSE HE DID IT
YEARS AS MAYOR BECAUSE HE DID IT
AS A REPUBLICAN, STRONG ON LAW
AS A REPUBLICAN, STRONG ON LAW
ENFORCEMENT, CRACKING, YOU KNOW,
ENFORCEMENT, CRACKING, YOU KNOW,
SUPPORTING LAW ENFORCEMENT,
SUPPORTING LAW ENFORCEMENT,
CRACKING DOWN ON UNIONS, ALL OF
CRACKING DOWN ON UNIONS, ALL OF
THE THINGS THAT DEMOCRATS DON’T
THE THINGS THAT DEMOCRATS DON’T
WANT TO DO.
WANT TO DO.
>>  NEWT:  RIGHT.
>>  NEWT:  RIGHT.
HE SPENT ABOUT 25 MILLION PER
HE SPENT ABOUT 25 MILLION PER
DELEGATE.
DELEGATE.
IT’S NOT THE ALL-TIME RECORD,
IT’S NOT THE ALL-TIME RECORD,
BUT STILL, THAT’S A PRETTY LARGE
BUT STILL, THAT’S A PRETTY LARGE
AMOUNT OF MONEY FOR A DELEGATE.
AMOUNT OF MONEY FOR A DELEGATE.
STEVE: IT IS INDEED.
