

Systematic Magic

Published by Jean-Nichol Dufour at Smashwords

Copyright 2011-2018 Jean-Nichol Dufour

Sunrise Edition

TABLE OF CONTENT

DRAGON DREAMS

8-SYSTEMATIC MAGIC

1/4

2/4

3/4

FIRE UNICORN DREAM

9-MUD STREET

1/4

2/4

3/4

First things first

This is part 5 of a suite forming the book "A Flower To Life". It's a fictional story I decided to make available as a suite because it is too long or too big for most book sites on the net. I will eventually try publishing as paperback, again, but for now it seems it's not the style literary agents want to see, it's too long, too big, very bad English, not fitting their market or what they like to read; I never got a criticism about content. In fact, after trying for a year I'm sure nobody in the publishing industry ever read it. Now that you know how bad it is since connoisseurs judged it so while complaining they get nothing special to read, I'll talk about the killing point; I want free digital copies available to anybody, and that is impossible, even if I let the publisher have all the profits they can manage to gain from selling it as paperback (and digital too). So I separated the book as a suite to distribute it freely on Smashwords, while the book as a whole will be sold on Amazon (Amazon Canada deleted my profile, so I removed my work, not that I sold many, 1 copy...), and nobody except me touches the text. I know that literary agents are a bit right about my "very bad English", but it's part of their job to see potential and help, not push people to self-publishing, which it's sure not something I can afford. For now I don't take it too badly because my work is about starting a new reality on earth, it must cover a vast range of hard philosophical, spiritual, personal, psychological, political and fundamental subjects, and gaining all round competence with all that will require lots of time and quite a few updates to get right, particularly with the casual style I have chosen. While some (I wonder who...) will argue about my style, I believe I have chosen the fastest and best route to get my arguments read by a maximum of people, I want my work as the adventure of a guy battling a whole reality in a realist way. As for the why I want an independent source free, it is because I know this will be a unique and rare artefact, and I don't want anybody to take control of it after I'm dead. I want a place where my profile and my work can remain available after my death in its integrity of form, even if a transfer of platform becomes necessary. I accept that people make any variation of it if it's not for bad intents or self-interests, but the original must remain integral. And one last thing, up to the flower edition, I swear upon all the entities I believe in that all my work is free of external influence that I know of (maybe except gods); it is all the invention, imagination and deductions of someone who was curious and interested in science when young, and forced to a religion as a kid. My work has arisen from my experience and judgment of reality as I interacted with it, so no book on religion has been opened, no books on the mind, no book on psychology or philosophy and internet searches may be limited to a few details.

DRAGON

I made the first part of this dream around 25 and my last revisit at 30. I start in a castle, the castle of my mother (I don't see my mother but I feel it is, in fact, there are a few things I'm not sure about this dream, but I got images in my mind that can only be related to it). When I open the front door, I find myself in deep water and I swim to the surface. It's a small lake. I swim to reach a little beach south west, almost drowning several times, each time seeing the castle deep under water. When I reach the small beach, I stand on it nude and look around. The place all around is almost totally razed and devastated, but there is a track of thick forest less than a kilometer wide that follows the exact sinuous way of a dirt road for a single car. The dirt track is covered under the thick cover of the trees so I don't see it but I know it's there. It comes from out of sight somewhere around the north to out of sight to the south curving near the lake to the west of it, never reaching it.

There is a camp on the beach a little away facing the lake; there is a padlock on it. Everywhere except the track, the forest have been razed at the chainsaw then burned. The north is a rising plain covered with this black and gray, mixed with stumps, expanse of ugliness, except for maybe 20 camps thrown about at almost regular intervals. This part of the décor covers my vision when I look north. When I look east there is a big devastated and abandoned airport. No planes or any parts of them around, only a few destroyed structures. I feel that, at an axle between the rising plain and the airport, there is a large body of salt water, maybe an ocean, it is to the north east. When I look south, I see an unknown place, there is nothing except flat grey devastation to the end of sight, the sun is setting and you can feel and see the searing heat rising from the ground. When you look around, the décor don't move normally, it switches like photography. It is like the places are inaccessible and separated existing only for me to know they are there. So if I look at the rising plain I can't see anything from the airport but I know it's there. When you look at one or the other place the rest disappears.

I'm standing in this environment in total silence, not a sound, not a sign of life. I'm facing the north plain because I feel the only movement I'll see will come from that direction. I'm seeing some movement from far away behind the plain and there start raising the biggest beast of a red dragon that could exist, its wingspan covers the whole plain in shades. It is an ordinary red dragon, just flabbergastingly big. Then I get to see his face, not friendly but not totally hostile either, just a "don't fuck with me" kind of face. It doesn't open its "mouth", which is more like a beak, so I don't know if it's got 300 teeth in rows in there or something. I see only 3 damn big ones coming straight ahead out of the maw like a bird with a very long beak. They are about half a meter long things more ivory than teeth, two in the lower jaw slightly curving upward and one in the upper jaw slightly curving downward, serrated between the two others. That seems to be enough sightseeing as I wake up.

In the second part of this dream, it is early dusk and I'm with my dad in a gravel pit securing the canoe on the pick-up, he is smiling his "surprise" smile, we're going fishing, in fact we're going for very big fishes as our poles are very long and heavy things made of steel, they are beautiful with stars engraved on the handle. For our lines, I must climb an electric tower with cutters. For our worms, we must jump in the sand like crazy until big snakes come out, which we catch alive with our bare hands, I get bitten but I'm immune to poison. We each catch one and put it in a 5 gallons. Then we are on a dirt track in thick woods going fast; going fast in whipping branches has always been exiting to me so I'm quite happy. We're slowing down to a stop and I see a lake and realize that I know where we are; this is the lake of another dream. We put the canoe down in the trail, get back in the pick-up and now we're rolling incredibly fast, so fast that it looks like we're plunging through a dark tunnel in the forest made from the cover of the trees, this is action, this is noise and father is very seriously concentrated. Then we pop out in total openness, with an ocean stretching before us. It is almost night and cloudy but I can see one abnormal feature; from the shore and plunging straight in the ocean is a stairway made of rock that climbs into nothingness. I wake up.

The third part of this dream starts with me crossing the lake in a canoe with cutters; I'm going to pillage those camps. I'm very motivated so I'm padding like crazy, and while crossing the lake, I see the castle of my mother underneath, then I paddle harder. I reach the small beach and the camp near the lake. I cut the lock and enter finding absolutely nothing, not a grain of sand, perfect cleanliness, perfect whiteness. I'm out of the place and walking quickly toward another camp on the plain when I look in my hand; I still got the padlock, why a padlock if there is nothing in the place? There must be a secret there; so I return to the camp and start tearing the walls down and they are full of working, light flashing electronic equipment. I load the canoe with some and cross to the other side and there, sitting on a stump in the only green spot around, is a woman siren on two fishy legs. I won't describe her because she is too much of a perversion but she's unforgettable. She sinks my canoe with all the stuff in it and she transforms me into a freak I'll never forget either, and we make explicit sex the kind that can't exist. I wake up.

In part four, I'm at the airport, it's been repaired, there are many new structures and military personnel are working everywhere. Everybody is very happy to see me, they all want to shake my hands. There are policemen too, patrolling on two wheeled skateboards with a handle and a police light on it. We race together as a platoon with those skateboards; they are fast, fun and flashing. I win easily and I climb a three steps podium that gives access to the opened door of a gigantic blue plane like I've never seen before, it doesn't look fast but it look very technological. Once inside, three people encased in a plastic dress that look like steel are waiting for me. They are seated in a four seats small triangle cubicle full of equipment on the bottom of a spherical bubble that moves. There are no windows anywhere. I put on a suit, take the last middle seat and I wake up.

In the last part, the dragon is dead. I don't know how but it's dead in front of me. No blood, no weapons, so maybe he died of a heart attack. I have the three teeth in my arms, someone is passing by and I give him one, I go back to the lake and throw one in it. Suddenly, I'm a ghost floating in the air enlaced with a ghost woman. I wake up.

I'll come back to this place a few times in other dreams, only for the pleasure of going there it seems. I'll never see the remains from the dragon again. I went there to visit the work of people building houses and taking care of grain fields and I slept in one of the old camps taking some useful and expensive things along. I know there are other people, but I don't know where they are. In another dream I went skiing with a woman down a 90 degree sand slope at the back of the plain with the ocean in front, even if there are small trees sticking out in the slope and it's quite dangerous, all goes well and we have lots of fun.

The last time I remember dreaming of the place, I almost did not recognized it. I was following an old cattle fence, a grain field to my right, and to my left a dark coniferous and profound forest feeling like an absorbing wall. But the canopy is clean for some length on the forest side of the fence, and there are a few old plank camps, they look like children things, I enter one, feeling unwelcome, but I notice people away and a home and the small lake. I think it is a bit later in that dream that I met the old elves puzzle camp tree for the first time.

THE SHELLING PART 8

************

SYSTEMATIC MAGIC

I happened to wonder if "pure" socialism, had it not been too aggressively competed by capitalism, could have started something better. But no, it had competitors instead of helpers, it was born inside an overwhelmingly ego reality and wherever it got installed it ended-up made of ego pyramids (systems) of control for profiting too. The voice of socialism, as the name implies, should have been the people, multiplicity, but manipulative BS made it a deception. The ideal may have been too extreme, and passing through the hands of manipulators and profiteers while adapting it to an ego reality developed it under its worst form. I just suppose things, I sure don't base my writing from other books, but that's an argument for starting a brand new reality, not a dependent zoo, not a transformation from whatever old system, and not under the control of manipulators and profiteers. So whatever or not it was based on the same ideology of superiority-inferiority and powerful beings controlling things in luxury (gods), socialism developed as exploiting institutions with power, control and money hungry leaders seeking always the same form of control over the majority of population, separating everything into controlled spheres (or pyramids) closed to most people, profoundly dividing the population. It played on the same game board as others systems; divide to reign, PMBBD (Propaganda, Manipulation, Bullshit, Brainwash, Disinformation) and, even if it look superior to capitalism in what I understand of its principles, it lead to the same end as it is, maybe even worse. The subject of this next part will turn around the best system. (Of the universe I should add; my dad is stronger than yours...).

It is not the government that invented electricity or the telephone or that "liberated" women and slaves; it is the fantastic efforts of "good" people. Governments are more like institution of control that exploit the people's money (energy) to systemize everything for more control, which can take the form of other controlling and profiting structures when it is too much trouble to manage, or they open the door to some new market, controlled by people with the same kinds of attitude, so they all end-up as a gang of friends often bitching each others in luxury or designing schemes to create enemies or inferiors out of people who don't think like them. Maybe I'm exaggerating a little, no? And there are always exceptions like religions which serve precise facets. Anyway, the government did not wake up one morning and said "let's stop slavery" no, someone was ready to take unbelievable risks to realize his wishes of change, inspiring masses which became emotive and explosive (that's situation dependent and the form may be different). The government system had no choice but to permit changes to take place, even if they were ready to assassinate to prevent the positive change, even if they were ready and waiting for it.

The government, in most instances, profit from any opportunity to make itself an image and become an invincible structure like a religion. When there is enough people, new dependencies, comforts, techs, visual artifacts etc, controlling ego conglomerates (gangs) who seek to take the best from people for their different division and competition goals of superiority, can go easier on their population, unless they are not served like gods or don't have all they want in exaggeration, since the only way to stop the baby crying is to give it everything it wants. But they'll still try to give birth to more controlling gangs like themselves first.

So governments, continually learning to control people better, continually develop better preventive ways to manipulate people, with civil war, slavery, torture, as the worst options; no controlling gang likes to be demonized by the waking up of consciousness in "its" populace. Today they know they need to leave lower people a minimal amount of money to survive unless they revolt, even under their PMBBD pressures. Anyway, it's far less trouble controlling a population of self-accepted slaves watching a screen, to listen to authority, than with violence. With PMBBD, entertainment, sex people, humorists, dependences etc, all they have to do is to keep a façade of good...Even then, some made civil war because that changed nothing to the comfort of the controlling gangs and it got the population to obey their authority (when they'll have seen enough actual blood and violence). So they did it, and still do, completely oblivious to the message of change that massive argumentation, and the building of protestation structures, carries; when civil war is developing (not all civil wars), it doesn't mean governments should evolve, it means it is too late, governments are retarded beyond any measure of sense to their population.

Governmental institutions, and their dependent brainwashed defenders and "lovers", is always the last entity to change and is often the most retarded structure (mentally), whatever they are proud of all the structures "they" invented to grow their system functional at the biggest scale possible (the planet's the limit, like it is the goal of the competition). In a sense, they watch over things and wait for opportunities arising from the population and research, to systemize things toward their vision and make it invincible. They'll even limit positive changes to an insignificant expression if they are not ready to systemize them their way and for the like of themselves. They'll change because they fear losing control, or to gain votes, they build infrastructures to profit from anything, then these end-up in the hands of the most ego profiteers that can exist, the ones who have the strongest profiting dreams, of manipulation dreams, or control, or luxury, or admiration, or fucking, etc, because these systems were unconsciously made to better profit such people when more pressure is added.

In a control for ego pyramidal reality of de-responsabilisation and exponential injustice based on PMBBD, division and competition hype, the governments have jobs to do. And they mostly do these jobs, we must give them that, if not, they wouldn't be there. But as the name of the reality implies they'll mostly do their job in the worst possible manner, with the least possible efficiency, with the most possible incompetence, the most expensively possible and for the worst possible reasons. I'm exaggerating just a little, but you can find many examples, democracy or not, representativeness or not, like when they decided women were good enough to be worth a voting right (which means nothing), why didn't women had that right from the beginning of democracy in ancient Greece? And guess what the main argument for democracy was at the time? Go ahead, I won't say it! And suddenly, at the dissection epoch, we discover women have a brain! They are people too! Wow! And you think they've been suddenly privileged by good politicians? They had been selected out of political seats for thousands of years, their effect highly limited to influencing their men, they needed to take an adequate form for their opinion not to be at risk to the political system since washing the dishes didn't make them dishwashers, or is it hygiene and baby raising machines? They needed to become competitive, to hate the other side, men! A bit like using war as a tool to define the form of the world and its basic philosophy, then make war to change the form of the world and its basic philosophy illegal. Women are not a risk to the system for sure, they even fit the ego competition philosophy better than men now.

They still had to fight, competition oblige, there are opportunities too, fear too, women are supposed to fear violence more than men, so you can bet war is the best timing to give them voting right. In some countries women were "liberated" to start right away producing ammo for assassinating others (if I'm not mistaken, it is even the reason they were given voting right, not out of good will at all), enough selection, manipulation and seclusion was done. And that's why the monarchy didn't say a word, even though it had a perfectly behaved woman at its head at an epoch where women didn't have voting rights, because they were made to fit too, and they were privileged to be exemplary reflection of the ego gods ideal, and this example still stands to this day, and no psy, nobody modern or evolved or social, even think about these things anymore.

For all history until that moment, no man found it unfair that women didn't have their say in things? And all of a sudden it becomes a ridiculous notion? I bet there were men in ancient Greece and far before that who wanted the opinion of women in everything, so why the "elite" didn't want it? Why? Because they are the most retarded in good consciousness. In an ego reality, it is the most ego ones who are the most privileged, encouraged and rewarded, their consciousness is developed for things that turn around their life, like fame, or imprinting history, not for good, good for them is the admiration of the ones they manipulate, or gaining a maximum, whatever the unfairness, without killing or raping, that's the extent of their consciousness.

Do you need a recap about who I qualify as ego people? In case it's beyond your understanding...or you prefer to think they don't exist? They are the most ready to do anything with their skills to gain money, or power, or control, or glory, or any advantage for themselves or their gangs, and the pressure selection works toward that end all the way to the bottom where the pressure and competition will encourage a mentality where either you become a "prostitute" (sell your soul to the devil) or you're in grave troubles (whatever it's from bad decisions that shouldn't have happened if you were in a good reality), so instead of rewarding those who stand with integrity and good principles, we reward those who can go as low as possible for money, often just to survive (have or keep a minimal standard of living); everybody has a price, if not you die to make it true. So if you stand for anything that doesn't serve the system or that is not marketable as a source of profiting, then you end-up alone, or poor, or in the streets, or dead. As for legal protesters, they are already embarked, they are part of the selection and mostly protest for better work conditions, but they'll still have to take their feet and protest like we're in medieval times, and you can bet those higher up will push down...

As for the process, it is a long and complex one covering a lot of adaptation time, intertwined with revolutions and economic crisises. Sometimes it's a revolutionary idea that is good or wrong and then it gets adjusted to problematic situations, at the advantage of friends or family, sometimes it's a big business pressure to perform better that end-up as austerity for a successful business model spread all over the place, sometimes it's a government that institute a system of self ass protection through hypocrite privacy invasion, or an increase in expensive counterproductive police enforcement, sometimes it's just a little action or an innocent one that will grow to vast proportions in their next hundred years, other times they act directly through PMBBD, or hype, or they'll do it unconsciously, from old frustrations, or displacements effects. Just a few examples in the vast panoply in history, a lot purely done with self interest in mind, particularly when dealing with conglomerate dreams of monopolizing things from unfair competition grounds, to exploit for the biggest stash or a family dynasty, as they develop their view of humanity.

If there are many instances in a year on the planet where such actions reinforces a selection process serving an ego reality, think of what it is for thousands of years of efforts. And I'm talking pressure selection here, not laws meant for the selection to behave. A lot of their actions are hidden and the ones that they show, with some PMBBD, are praised by an admiring or jealous population that have been pressure selected over time for their tolerance level (as an example, if you got crucified, or beheaded from the top of a pyramid for a way of thinking in old times, then it is a selection process where those who endorse the system better thrive, and such a factor is absolutely a genetic factor, there are people born to better accept, tolerate and adapt to a way of thinking and they have been selected to thrive to the point that they form a vast majority of the population today, in fact, the genetic factor have been strengthened through history to the point that it is a fact of humanity today, something that will take thousands of years of contrary pressure to change, and the pressure must be as strong as what have been invested as efforts to bow humanity to the mentality, so it is kind of impossible unless you directly select people for a new reality), it is not people like me who are thriving, exceptions like me don't even reproduce, I'm old stuff that reappears now and then, I'm so lucky to exist in fact that I reap a truck of bad luck as a compensation, if you want to see it like that, or you could say I'm just a random guy that had it to become me, nothing exceptional, the credit is all mine... So the selection process encourages those who better adapt, or accept, or tolerate, or encourage the system, particularly if they are defenders of the ego gods ideology since these "qualities" are often institutionalized for it; why do you think the most ego country of the earth is the one that got the greatest proportion of people who say they believe in the ego god? And it is my opinion that this country contains the most evil relative to population too.

These actions that create a pressure selection can only be made by people with the means to do them, those means are many and often indirect like using PMBBD to pressure people to do something or lead them to generally endorse a beard. Manipulators and profiteers mainly, because ego attitudes are first (less limited by good principles), and they made a reality in their image or to reflect their philosophy about life to the point of condemnation through the transformations they made of languages as an automatic mentality indoctrination tool, in part by cumulating twisted significations. One good principle or word that gets twisted every few years through history is enough to condemn people to an invalidating accumulation of unconscious PMBBD, and since time advances and the reality gets perfected and the people are stuck in a quest for money, and there is a supplementary effort involved in following more life principles in their best way to help humanity morph toward a good ideal (should be very valuable monetarily), you can only deal with the present ingredients that are falling in the stew, hardly and rarely, and once the ingredient is in, you have to adapt to it from birth, you won't be able to kick it out, and while you're doing that, the recipe continues...

Even if there are exceptions, most of the time the "elite" (10% top of the pyramids) are the most sexist, the most racist, the most unfair, even if they'll project a different image to pass for saints. They lead in anything related to arranging people and things for profits, and people must still protest or revolt to make them steer away from such goals, even if the competition to gain votes does give a bit of influence from the selection that is all absorbed in TV and internet PMBBD. Sorry, but that doesn't qualifies as leadership to me. Now, unless they act recklessly, they'll be very rich for the rest of their life if they succeed at gaining a controlling position. So, my request for their good consciousness evolution is that a fair reality be made, but I guess they'll wait for revolt to lead in that... Next, like women who were given the right to have an opinion, I want my say in everything concerning me, including the budget, military stuff, and any law. Will they lead in that or will they wait for revolt?

As for women who were given voting right from the sudden waking-up of consciousness of men, I say it is all a matter of good and evil, and since the fundamental didn't change, then women just took their place in hell. Good men (with a consciousness developed to seek good) always wanted the opinion of women from the beginning of time, evil men did not, and that's exactly the same for fairness. (Don't forget the balance principle, we are not born evil, we become evil by listening to it, by defending it, by helping it, by tolerating it, by adapting to it, by lying to masses, by being unfair to others etc.) Now women gained voting right not so long ago, and to think most of them passed their history listening to authority and destroying their independence, no chance science would study the effect of living as dependent castrated inferiors for thousands upon thousands of years (often with the help of religions), what is the effect to their mind? They passed this whole time closed mouthed about the reality men made to finally be given opinion worth when it is in troubles because it was not made from complementarity, or love, but from submission to superiors, whatever it is one sex or the other. As for the present, all that applies to unfairness, when I say I want my say in every facet of the budget or any law or military spending, it's because I know I'm not developing optimally if I can't do it, and the end result is a selection process, the developing of humanity with an atrophied or twisted facet.

Democracy-capitalism is a business that will always make things unfair from a philosophy of competition for profits. It will profit from everybody by condemning them to a superiority inferiority ideal dictated by possessiveness, even before they're born, using PMBBD to better serve a precise selection. This is the best system of the universe, implicitly said by both the attitude of those who control and those who have been made impotent to see beyond façades. It is a condemnation of the whole of humanity to a single view through never ending competition, the best system for ego manipulators and profiteers and their competitions, and everybody must embark unless they live a hell of troubles.

We even developed our civilization to completion (condemnation) thinking one sex is superior, the other inferior, not even worth an opinion, then we free the other as equal, good for eternal unfair division and competition in the game. And it still works like that; when there is too much pressure for change, then a new pyramid or set of laws will be created to embark a new gang it is tired to hear complaining, but only if the system feels safe it won't be weakened.

What I don't like of the story is that the system was made invincible before women had the right to an opinion, even if it's an opinion that means nothing since you only use it to choose your superior, which is a politician. But I'm wasting my time; they say that behind every great man there is, or are, women, so I guess they don't need voting rights, only a bed, and now they got both, the bed and the votes? Or maybe they had to pass by the bed to get at the vote, and still do, but that is worse than anything. As for present people boasting how great and good and fair the Greeks who invented democracy were, they should shut their PMBBD devices, democracy was PMBBD from the beginning, to the point that not so long ago, women couldn't vote, whatever the monarchy, and slavery was a thing humans with a good consciousness wanted. Now, even if it adapted to skip being battled, democracy is still a PMBBD façade to hide an ego unfair systematization. What did these Greek gods invented with democracy that is so big we need movies after movies and political speeches after political speeches glorifying it? Tell me! Nothing, people were voting long before democracy, they just took control of voting, isn't that great? And what did they use it for? To manipulate for more unfairness, to enslave the mind of people, to condemn them to a system. Greek gods and philosophers were so hot we never end making movies glorify their philosophy and love vision where the bosses ended-up as a bunch of, of, exemplary divergent sex performers, sex offenders didn't even exist so great they were! And they invented everything, they didn't run about studying other people's ways no way! All their books? Pure connection to god! Nobody manipulating history! Oh, they sure built the most marvelous godly temple, like every civilization that got its hierarchy of admiration emphasized on the best manipulators... The Romans are not better, and all these civilizations that needed a Christ for pope institutionalized castration, to amass richness beyond belief, while doing the saint war thing with their god loving workers who are now all peaceful and tolerant as they wait for the end in anticipation, so much better, so sure, that they can say I'm evil just by looking at me...

Then someday when we'll have enough and revolt they'll brandish direct democracy, getting it out from somewhere in the basement, like it's the new wow thing that will make things fair, but you can bet it will be a perversion that will keep evil going as strong. In fact, after a few thousands years of pressure selection, the mind of people is better adapted to the momentum of reality, and so someday they'll be ready for the direct democracy stuff, and under the cover of "making mistakes" they'll slowly adjust the way it works until there is no risk to their hegemony. Now, that's supposing people do revolt before being in the face of too late, so it is very unlikely to me, the human mind morphed, we're condemned, probably only a famine or epidemic will get people's ass battling the system seriously, and I said seriously, a peaceful protest is not, and a million people is a fraction of a percentage. And even then, they wouldn't fight for something really different, it would be an under product of the same thing or worse. And people get tired of dying too, so once they'll have the opportunity for a compromise they'll bow, low. Today, most protest are money flow related, put more money here or there and we'll be happy, or worse, you can almost disband the protest by throwing a bunch of money at the protesters, almost, but you can't make things too easy since you don't want a never ending parade of protesters bums in front of the parliament.

There are all kind of exceptions to governmental idiosyncrasies, impotence and incompetence, that's for sure, but I'm sure I could do a better job of making life better if I wouldn't be rejected or demolished immediately by the democratic selection process that gave earth hegemony to businessman mentality. I could bloat my brains learning political and law mumbo jumbo, practice my charisma with babbling ability, then follow the way of the structure which would reject me at the voting level because I have long hairs and don't fit Hollywood or psy stereotypes, whatever or not the biggest part of the job consist of listening to lobbying gangs, bureaucrats, senators, technocrats, experts, advisors and many more, while using your manipulation skill to act like it is you that thought about and decided everything, like you wrote a big book to form your philosophical, spiritual and mental vision... Apart getting tired showing-off and traveling around at great expenses like monarch, a vast majority of the "positive" changes a politician will do is to expensively change some things that will reinforce or defend the system or his country, yes it will, but it's always in an optic of competition, so the result will not take the best form. Still, gremlins need to be happy in hell, they need a gym too, and they need to be condemned too, with stuff and mentalities and "services", but again it's the goal and the result that's important, and I don't see things getting fairer, whatever all the investments on research, which could have been a hundred times greater in a more adequate reality, which would have resulted in humanity being far more advanced today, with far less exploitation of resources and production of pollution, but the fact that the people gave everything to a single view of human development, from whatever justifications, like competition, make it so my opinions can always be discarded as unproven; this reality would sure not like to meet an alien civilization that did things in their best fashion for good with well defined priorities...

And now that everybody is embarked and working on this pyramid or that in the name of democracy, that they've got television and internet to do the baby immersion thing, to stay soaked all the way to their death, that people are dependent from all kind of services as they stash to protect from fear, that ego competition has become genetic, the chances for a profound change or a true revolution or a massive sustained uprising is practically eliminated. There is no risk of a true fundamental change that would shake or transform the reality, things are accepted as they are and encouraged one way or the other by most people, just make them feel a little evil so they don't "throw the first rock" or a little religious for that matter, add some pardon, tolerance and acceptance philosophy, qualify anybody against the system as a violent or terrorist, create hype with singers, or better, make them fans of team sports, to associate in nationalism and divide in country competition, and there is not much left of humanity's will for a different way. Oh, you can choose yourself a cause that doesn't really attack fundamental problems, just be on par with everybody, or take the examples of publicized stereotypes, but steer away from anything that could conflict your view of good and evil and redefine your responsibility in life, hundreds of causes exist, surrounded by people with good intents, evidently, it's just a shame that they can be tools to divide people and a place for the rich to distribute their philanthropist candies... So for now the fight and competition is mostly a matter of who will put his name on which brick with a small description of what he did to strengthen it, repair it, and maybe the things he regret not having done to help the pyramid.

There is a tendency to believe that it is because of the rich and powerful that we "evolve", that they are the ones that bring good changes to this world. Even if they should (they're the ones that took possession of money which is the action power of people, their life energy value, which is decided by who?), as I already said, it is mostly the contrary; they are the last ones to react in good (good) form to something, and through history, whatever the good people, even good intentioned politicians, the most ego end-up profiting from everything, and they don't want to change the structure that brought them there. Concerning governments, you must take into consideration that through the history of a system you'll have politicians who will arrange things for greater profits, then spend the means on other systems, then the next politician will rarely seek to dismantle the new way of doing things and put the money back in the pockets of the people, and then you got business doing the same. It means that whatever you got good politicians, the end result is forever more austerity for the lower pyramids, or less liberty or cheaper (more crappy) production. Are you living in a system that is a reflection of good and fairness? No, and who is supposed to govern? Who? They may, under a lot of pressure, compete between the like of themselves as to what controlling gang, or what form of, will accept a change or how to take a change and make a profitability gang from it, and people are brainwashed to believe that they must wait for these leaders to change things, as it kind of dissolve responsibility. We spend our energy blindly on a this system because that's the only system in all those we tried that worked, it is the best of all, not perfect but the best, the rest were proven bad in competitive hate... If some other reality or system is worth trying, don't worry, we'll give it a fair chance in competition like we always do (Some sarcasm). So don't worry people, and listen to big daddy, he always knows what to do, and don't forget he's got armies of protectors of all kinds, soldiers, policemen, experts, scientists, counselors, psy, TV, etc, etc.

But "normal" people must not think about these things, find yourself a job and be proud of yourself, pyramids are built on pride by proud people, pride is a great motivator; it can be good for willpower or for self-inflation or both; you can live a long life on pride alone, but pride is a very relative thing, you can even be proud of the many people that stay in misery by your attitude, proud of worthless structures that represent hype or evil; you can be proud of absolutely anything. Personally, I failed to find something that would make me proud in this reality, I mean proud at the level of my thinking, I know I could be proud of work well done easily, but that's too superficial for me.

Now, for those who think aliens will soon debark, and me with my vision of good and evil, then I wouldn't worry too much about a visit, unless they are retards. The highest probability about an alien civilization finding us is that their system and mentality would be far more advanced, but I may be wrong. My point is that if they would probably live in a society where judgment has a more global value, so, as we judge them wathever consciously or unconsciously, they will judge us and I don't think the result would be that much positive if we have the attitude we currently have, and who will be right between the judgment from everybody composing their civilization without PMBBD influences and a few of our godly egos gangs (like the G7, but they can hide better, don't worry...) dealing everything hidden from us before manipulating us to accept their decision with a few television meeting or Hollywood PMBBD?

The way we have chosen is the default "no way", if you prefer, all our system to date are developments from anarchy; we never really tried something else, we tried remove the problems that made of anarchy such a bad way of managing things. Evidently, the first step to this is someone taking the lea, then regularly taking the lead, then taking the lead in many things, then being dependent from the leader deciding thins, then a systematization of leaders or chiefs having an overwhelming influence in any decision, then a form of pyramidal dictatorship competition. All this develops as population, needs and complexity increases, in reaction from pressures of people, taking the form of revolts and revolutions, until you have a system that stays stable for eternity, whatever the way or form. We are under a continuation process of a transformation of the pleasure system into the reward system (if you remember from "The Seat Of My Mind"), and this proves we can completely change our mentality from acting from our conscience, since postponing pleasure to make a whole civilization based on the exploitation of until it becomes unconscious , genetic. Again as I already explained in a previous chapter, it means we become what we want, as long as the principles we want to base our existence on (or cultural race, more later) are making sense (logical), are non-conflicting at whatever profundity level, and are sustained for thousands of years within a group; fairness and love are totally failed examples in this reality. My whole work is based on this principle, in any way way you look at it, and it is one of the many reasons why future people will respect it. We took an artificial form from twisting our natural way with our consciousness, and we'll have to extend this principle all the wat to creating the best ideal of civilization for our species, from the experience we gained until now. As of yet, the best we did is compete ideals to twist them until they fit the wishes of a "god" ideal, and this attitude has condemned humanity in all kind of ways. Today we have strictly no knowledge or experience at doing things differently except as variations to give the same level of unfairness or worse for some sect and religious illuminated who confound their indoctrination for happiness, and I'm not talking about some high IQ gurus and masters who think humanity should only eat eggs or live in cement igloos... No wonder we boast our pitiful system as the best.

As for other civilized species that may find us, why would they help us? They will need good reasons, even guarantees, since the enterprise will be difficult and expensive; they may spend their energy colonizing other stars for future plans instead of arming themselves to the teeth coming here, which is totally unrealistic when considering the level of difficulty in reaching other stars; it may be fun to have millions of vessels in a game, or millions of enemies you can crush single handedly, but it's absolutely not a reflection of reality, always easier and better in imagination, and games transport imagination very well, that's a reason why I wanted to do a game as a simulation of the workings of another reality. Science fiction books, and all movies are good at exaggerating and thinking big and light speed and folding space time, me too, but I try to stick to possibilities from existing science because what I do is real and meant to explore such possibilities.

The reality is that the window of resources and exploitation and difficulties of all kind of sources and limitations will make it very unlikely we'll meet with another vessel. And that is if we are able to do it. Sending spy satellites to see with whom we'll have to deal with is a far more realistic step, see what they broadcast as ideals for their species, if they'll develop in a trustworthy way, which means integrity, good and evil, and all kind of principles. If we stop country competition and the infinite ego competition we may have a chance, but for now we have condemned everybody, past present and future, to a systematization that isn't appropriate for such far thinking. Our system is not the best at all, and we made it invincible by letting people manipulate masses in communication in the name of liberty, twisting everything and making a selection that fit to the point that any other ways will fail unless the whole reality either work to make a new one, or crash altogether in super massive troubles while eliminating the possibility for a rebirth with continual war to ego people until another kind of systematization becomes widespread enough.

As for extraterrestrials, I wouldn't discard the possibility that some have been observing us for a long time, just waiting to be sure we are either a space success or a failure before deciding to shake our hands or kick our asses, while recording our history to upset us before the event, who knows...And I don't think pretty and happy, full teeth in the wind sex women will impress them; daemons are not necessarily ugly and they're damn happy in hell! Now, surely ego gods, who are supposed to be ultimate benevolent beings, won't like being demonized like that, besides, I know nothing of life...

But I'm talking for nothing; our unconscious modifiers deducted what will happen with aliens as much as where our mentality will lead us. We are not scared of everything for nothing; we're so overwhelmed by fears, particularly of not having enough money, friends or popularity, that it encompasses our whole life to the point of making us an enemy to changes that could lessen it. The only changes we get are the ones proposed by the reality and fitting it, and yes our mind is fooled into thinking we're making things better while governments always boast how they're making the world better and that things will change for the better, but yes, unfairness is faring forever better. You may even have the illusion that you're growing a consciousness with so much babbling (information, disinformation) all around, but all you do is patching the exploding pyramidal tip of an arrow that is hitting the impenetrable wall of the laws of life and matter.

The history of government shows that the institution is so scared to lose control that it kills or alienates those who can bring deep changes they can't integrate in their mentality. The PMBBD is so old and profound that even if someone brought ideas that could really make the world better, just ideas, people condemned themselves to this reality so much, out of all kind of selected fears, that they would use any conflicting arguments to ostracize or insult such people. Today there is an influent gang to destroy any risk to the system right in the egg at the first opportunity, to the point that psy science and religions developed a big part of their argumentation to hypocritically destroy such people; if he's not the antichrist, then he's got a psychiatric problem in the head, like everybody that doesn't follow the implanted vision of things or doesn't fit their popularized stereotypes or godly goals.

One way I see this reality is as a control for ego pyramidal reality of de-responsibilisation and exponential injustice based on PMBBD, division and competition. The final result is a reflection of the general view of god (s) that have been implanted by religions that reflected the ideal of the best manipulators and profiteers. That is what we have reached through our systems, an invincible system better serving one type of mentality, his name is democracy-capitalism, or manipulation for profiting. You trust him because he wears the prettiest dress that he could find which is the perversion of the right to vote as a word to manipulate people; democracy. He is roaming free, making of the whole earth his home while scientists try to control it, and fail since they play his games, help him, and profit tremendously from him. This whole entity is your god people, but you may call him Lucifer or Dracula, something like that if you want. He took the earth to feed on it, and he will do until the end. And isn't it the reason for those pyramids in the first place? Building an eternal structure for their gods and loving workers to be eternal in death?

Democracy as it is is the dead end of the evolution of pure dictatorship through PMBBD. In between, you can have a hundred different kinds of variations of decision ways, all with a single being or a gang somewhere possessing a veto on things and the people end up dealing with propositions, and most of the time tribal protest is still the only way of expression, even if what is expressed is twisted from wrong judgment since humanity have been pressure selected to express its strongest emotions for manipulators. Anyway, democracy doesn't stop most forms of governments from existing, and no problem with that for this reality, as long as the basic philosophy remains, which includes competition. The exception to this is the need to always have at least one enemy to keep the "good" cover from democracy (or any cover for that matter); people must always have the feeling that they fight evil, and governments need to justify war machines production beyond self defense.

Democracy is based on selecting politicians to represent a place, if you limit your vision to that you could think it is allright in a pyramidal reality, you divide the territory in pieces, all with a politician competition, and the number of winning faction members decide the boss of the government, then all those politicians will pressure democratic mayors to the will of the government they represent, they all have a budget and try to listen to the population of their bit of the territory and all of them, with mayors, try to get bigger projects accepted by provincial governments and then country governments, that's somewhat how it works in pyramidal idealism in my place. And it does work to some extent, but the price of the politician system is extraordinary, I mean their pay and competition, then it's so corrupt that most the population abandoned all involvement long ago, beyond voting, it's a fight and mostly a waste of time, so you end-up with a precise selection of citizens which absolutely not represent most people. Big businesses and industrials lobbying gangs have infinitively more influence and effect at swaying the opinion of Finally, the wills of the population effect is practically inexistent beside voting; even when they do the get-togethers thing, it's mostly fake since it concerns only a super small fraction of the deciding factor, maybe 10% of the budget, like they buy a bunch of flower seeds and a facet of the population decides, with a lot of shouting and bitching and meetings, a lot of pollution, where the fuck are we going to plant these flowers! Or maybe we should return the seeds and make activities for children instead! But at least some type of people have the feeling of deciding a fraction of an insignificant something, or a bit of the budget...I'm not even sure I'm exaggerating, but it all look like a vast bullshit to condemn people to the monetary and the control system underneath which is capitalism for most places, but you can say profiting from innocence instead, be it true, enforced with PMBBD, willful from laziness or complexity.

The main use of democracy is to manipulate to give the illusion that the people have something to say. All the emphasis is on democracy, while it's just a coat for the unfair monetary system, and it's an incredibly costly system to choose this god politician instead of that one to run the business at it, with a PMBBD test once in a while. And all those costly political gangs are almost all the same even if they put a big emphasis on slight differences or changes. They say they represent the population, but it is a lie, they divide the population, they say everybody is welcomed but it is a lie, only one type of mentality can get to the top, and being more left or right changes nothing to the fundamentals of ego reality, it's just an emphasis to divide people on the same thing, whatever you like to believe being left is more fair, it's just a manipulation for political big brains know it all know nothing to babble themselves an importance in their limited final vision, as they condemn people to a single path. The effect is ridiculous while you believe there are only 2 option for humans, and they're within the same best system, Wow! You could say the ego reality used democracy effects to serve its goal, people wanted their say, they were ready to battle for change, let's use voting to give them the illusion that they are in control, that things are fair, and let's call it democracy. Then you sing democracy (the perfect view of it, not the bullshit you made to serve your agenda) until it is imprinted in the mind of people as a "synonym" of good. Then it's only a matter of coming to the conclusion that you die, whatever you are the boss god or a government god or a superstar god, whatever the bullshit you die, but you don't want your vision destroyed by the next in line, so you have to patent the system so that only the likes of you take the seat (what I'm talking about is the set of attitudes necessary to serve the devil, a big fucking desire to show off! (Reinforced by the lacks imposed by the reality for it)). And that's it, you just signed a pact with the devil to guarantee the failure of solar life...All countries presently hide their unfairness behind the democracy fourre-tout, in a reality where the system makes people fail to develop the judgment and willpower necessary for life continuation, or where you perpetually need to mass manipulate with media institutions because if not things are guaranteed to go wrong.

The democracy capitalism business is the winning system for cold hard exploitation of human beings. That's how I baptize this system, I don't want to mess-up my head into the details of capitalism to sound knowledgeable and come back to the same conclusion. People are divided on the definition of capitalism, but I don't see why I should congest my mind with this, it is already far too heavy as it is, in fact, I should never have written a word or spent a minute understanding all the aspects of this reality, I should simply have skipped all these years of developing my argumentation by replacing all my first chapters with this simple phrase; "This whole reality is crap, so let's make a new one" I wouldn't care hearing that from people, and I understand those who are uninterested in the working of this system because it is a waste of time and the result is depression for a mind of integrity, but I'm strong, and I guess I need to justify, while knowing that no amount of argument will ever be enough for those people who invested themselves for it, or abandoned, or sold their soul to the devil, or who got themselves indoctrinated. The democracy-capitalism business is a beast out of control and apart from fantastic efforts from people to somewhat limit its appetite, it is scientist who are currently trying the most to use it, and scientific institutions may as well become the structure that profits the most from it, and that is extremely bad since science doesn't have anything as a base to define good and evil. I should add that politics for scientists is a logical, we need them to manipulate us to their vision of things, since the way they're going with the limits they are under from their philosophy of research will get most scientific spheres to the limit of their capacity soon. We may end-up in a few hundred years with scientists having no other use than being lost playing in the mess they made, so they got to make their profession still more indispensable, yeah, the science of the political scientist, something creepy like that, probably involving superstars and businessmen too...

There are all kind of forces inside a "pyramidal" system dealing enmity to and fro. It discharges frustration and responsibility mostly to the bottom of the pyramids where people displace to still "lower" people until it becomes a deep genetic accumulation of bad traits of diverse form that may need many generations of the contrary attitude to heal. But all that is incredibly is hard to explain precisely as everything is interrelated in complexity for global systematization of profits. You can have the middle part of a pyramid pointing at the socially assisted at the bottom, putting almost every wrong in the world on their shoulders (while in truth they use the less expensive way to survive), as an example, but the top part of the pyramid will try to befriend the bottom part because they know they are indispensable to the integrity and continuity of the pyramids, or to gain votes. This is a simple and incomplete example, there are many complex enmity exchanges within the pyramids, and most of them take the form of simple unfair divisions of things to form limiting rules where competition can take place.

Yet, there must absolutely be one enemy that encompasses the whole pyramidal reality, one were the use of the ultimate enmity ablation tool can be used; the army killing machine. And it is truly a killing tool, not the image of saint saviors they try so hard to spread. They exist to say; we are right and you are wrong so you are forced to accept our ways or die. Or you are forced to do this and if you don't accept, you die. Or we take this by force and if you don't accept, you die. Or we interpose ourselves to control you and if you refuse, you die. When they do nothing, they shine their boots (image, like suggesting we, civilians, are lucky to give them billions for killing research, if we wouldn't, we'd be missing many technological advancements, while in truth we'd be in year 3000 without them...In a good reality, that is, sure that in hell you need tons of killers and killing tools and machines, apart from an army of policemen to control people, and a tremendous flow of money toward PMBBD for manipulating people. 90% of all that isn't needed in a good reality, you can put half the money for fairness, the rest for good research, thus we'd be in year 3000 today). And the blue helmets change nothing to that, they are still an enforcement tool; just with a better façade; they're a Canadian thing after all... But they are still military people, whatever they took the more peaceful role of it, and that's why they are often publicized distributing food and help. They're a buffer too, used by the powerful to put their nose and control in anybody's things; if a situation doesn't please them, they send their untouchable benefactors to modify the situation more to their likings, while carrying weapons as defenders to keep the image of untouchable saints; looking like protectors and saviors distributing food and medication to people on the verge of dying, while running away under the dress of their mom if things really get ugly. And wasn't the justification for this invention to protect people? I say it is a failure across the board, even in part invented with PMBBD intents in the first place, to spread the democracy-capitalism business, to spread a culture, to shine image, all in all; fuck around with people.

Evidently, it is easy to choose dictatorship as a political enemy because it easily slips into insanity, and the greater simplicity and lesser limitations makes it so it is the way of governance that has the greatest potential (decision and action power) to make place and try something different. I won't say that dictators would build something better than an ego reality if they had the chance, I don't think there ever existed a good one, but I say that in human history, only dictators could have a chance at a better way. Hitler gave this reality such a scare that he was used to totally demonize dictatorship, even if his way of governance barely would qualify as such, and this reality will never end making demonizing movies about him, every country its own batch for manipulation. And many of the stories are updated to fit any argument against the best system in the mouth of Hitler, you cannot argument against it without ending up compared to the most demonized person in human history, so much that a lot of what have been made of the story is PMBBD. Showing black and white bits of film while someone dramatically demonize the guy like credibility is not a proof of historical truth, neither of the mentality of the guy. I'm not defending him, but you know I don't like people who twist the truth of history to their own ends.

Did Libyans actually started fighting because they wanted the democracy-capitalism business or because they revolted against a dictator? One of the main reasons why he became "successful" is because he fought some unfairness, even if he was not exemplary. So the guy kicked some unfair capitalists, and the people were happy because they were really unfair and they let the guy take control of the country. Then, all of a sudden, people revolt and want democracy-capitalism? They welcome America with open arms and it's big "love"? It doesn't make sense; I say their first goal was not to implant democracy-capitalism, but to get rid an inadequate leader. Powerful capitalist people profited from the opportunity to spread their wonderful best system still more, as a kind of vengeance too, they manipulated the revolt to become a Democratic thing because it was clear they wouldn't win without help, and the only help available came from Capitalist countries.

I hope everybody's happy now, they are still more condemned; they could revolt against a dictator, but they won't against the democracy-capitalism business. They could have wished to vote for someone else instead, simply, voting is not a synonym of democracy; the fundamental, as I already explained is a travesty of capitalism as a business, and democracy is a pretty coat for the monster. Voting and liberty have been twisted and exploited to become democracy in the mind of people, but voting is voting, what is voting? It is voting; you don't believe me? The definition of voting is not democracy, voting is a ridiculous manipulation competition facet of democracy-capitalism, good to select, through a big media PMBBD show, the boss that will run the business. The same for liberty, it is not a synonym of democracy, it is proportional to means democracy or not, and all systems have a different amalgam of liberty emphasizes depending from the amalgam of laws or concepts limiting liberty. The song that liberty is so big in democracy is mostly a manipulation. Evidently, once you reach the point of condemnation, you got to have facets where people have more liberties, like the liberty to manipulate and profit from anything...

So you'll never revolt against the democracy-capitalism business, no savior will come to help you in your battle against systemized unfairness ever again, you have decided your destiny, you are condemned. And yes the system unfairness is less than for dictatorship, but there are a thousand more extraordinarily unfair people while the system becomes a condemnation to the end of humanity, as exploitation reaches no tomorrow levels; it is the best system for opportunists, profiteers and manipulators.

And yes there is more liberty, since any market or job is good for the economy, even destruction, to some extent, or short lived items, but the ultimate price is the failure of solar life, it is the fastest track to it, and you'll be a part of it, you'll work for it, you'll encourage and defend it, like many countries that are currently "helped" by capitalistic countries, the goal is for every piece of land on earth to be made a capitalism business thing, and any twisted evil manipulative trick can be used to embark someone, or to alienate a country or leader that is not embarked yet, hypocrite provocations on the back of liberty or free speech, limitations to development from unfair embargos (isn't it how Americans provoked Japan to go to war? With an embargo on petrol? And what about the Vietnam war, and what about the weapons of mass destruction that they "proved" (while never showing the proof, as always) existed but that they never found, and they started a war out of it, and I'm skipping many other hypocrite scenarios you'll be too happy to discard as wild speculation or conspiracy theories, so sorry, I'm wrong, I don't know what I'm talking about, American governments are always right, always doing the good thing, they never cause troubles around them, they are saviors, and if you don't bow to what they see as the right attitude then you are an enemy.

But at least Libyans won't see the dictator kind of colorful monster anymore, they'll be black vampires instead, and instead of blowing away your heart with a hole, they'll suck your life blood and spirit until you become zombies. So that's what I say to all protesters against ego unfair people in this world, be careful not to be infiltrated by people dressed in the democratic black coat, they are there to twist your mind and goal to take control of your wishes, market your soul, to grow and protect the systemized unfair system to the end.

Now, thanks to all those evil dictators, nobody will ever want to try the style again once all the old ones are dead, but until now it seems they truly are all problematic capricious leaders who only think of big mansions and servants, richness beyond measure, and that include all those Arabs kings monarch (king or monarch? That is the question). So yes it may be better to eliminate such a kind of leadership than to let them develop megalomania from the height of their superiority, but democratic capitalism countries will probably end-up as worse in the end, and you can always select your dictator democratically...At least democracy capitalism produces more rich beyond anything, the population generally is less poor, but the price is an eternal condemnation to the system. In the end, a good dictator can get better results of change than a democracy-capitalism businessman (president or whatever), but the pressure cannot create good dictators, and that's still reality dependent; someone at the top, or a top god is a prerequisite for an ego reality, or an ego-gods ideology. Finally, you need exceptional mind integrity to do good as a dictator, and seeing oneself as a supreme superior that is irreplaceable sure doesn't help toward that end.

In the end, in the grand scheme of unfairness of this reality, the ones that successfully come to possess and control the most will manipulate everything to its own ends. In the political arena, that would amount to the association of all democracy capitalism countries, and anything else will be demonized. So anybody not getting to power following the way of the democracy-capitalism business will be demonized as evil dictatorship, all democracy capitalist country will be associated on that, until they win the earth. Then they'll war among themselves in the country competition where there must always be an enemy, since dictators won't exist anymore. The problem with that, apart from the fact that dictators must battle, not only other dictators near them, but democracy capitalism countries businessmen too, is that dictators have more direct action capacity, and populations can always fall back to the style if the democracy capitalism business exploit them too much or proves incapable of taking adequate decisions. Evidently, dictators have no choice to use most of "their" means for defense or war, surely not space exploration, particularly if they've been stripped clean of some resources, and those people like palaces too, like everybody rich, and an ego reality will only produce evil dictators, or it will seek to "corrupt" the adequate ones, with pressures of all kind, but what I meant to say is that in theory their system is simpler, and more adequate to many people. In fact, hell may develop as a planet divided in 2, a system for of high level PMBBD made invincible, and the rest of countries bitching among themselves in incompetence, being made practically powerless by the unfairness systematization of the association of democracy capitalist countries, while being pointed at as evil for their soul expressing their disgust as a preference for suffering under dictatorship, for a chance at having a justice capable leader. That sounds weird, but what I mean is that we shouldn't see dictators as daemons taking a place against the will of the population, in fact they may represent a will from a population that wants nothing to do with the democracy capitalism business that is proving itself as a final condemnation while showing evidence of massive unfairness. I'm not talking history here, I'm talking the present and the future; more and more people may come to prefer dictatorship for a chance at something different than being condemned. Me, I take the side of those who fight, the democracy capitalism business is the biggest mistake of humanity in my opinion, even if I know that being born there I probably wouldn't have been able to tell my opinion, and I'd have come to the conclusion that I should move to a democracy capitalist country, to write it worthlessly instead, as a good person sandwiched between 2 evils...

Political correctness will make it so there will be no country left to try to give birth to something else anyways. We'll never have explored anything else than under-products of the ego-gods ideology. As for socialism and communism, they are too extreme in their vision, possibly better when talking action and reaction, but when talking vast populations, the result is failure of human understanding one way or the other and so they are better adapted to the reality of capitalism if they are to survive in the current fiscal and PMBBD environment without grave problems, and I'm not talking about the high probability of fear and jealousy, or the requirements of competition, or the paranoia about human right violation, from people who wouldn't care to be fair in their comparisons, like the historical ugliness they spring from, as they admire ancient civilizations that built pyramids...Then there is the needs of survival which may include fast production of a ridiculously big military machine at the cost of population wellbeing, harshness, worse if you want a new mentality and you have to protect it from PMBBD influences from entities that are 100 times as big as you, installed long ago, in full entertainment swing, with all their guns pointed at you, judging you like they have a history of sainthood, waiting for any evil in their definition of it. Any new system will be put in the same dictatorship extermination bag as pure dictatorship, a risky competition meant to be eliminated. Any new system will develop at its worst in this environment, to defend from invading PMBBD competition, to the point that it comes down to what extent you're ready to sacrifice population wellbeing to make atomic bombs and a war machines to embark in the competition of who will get earth homogeneity.

When North America decided Russia was the "evil" country with its socialism, we had 10 times the military development potential capacity from fresh surface resources than the old and more exploited Russia. Never would Russia bomb, debark and invade America; that was PMBBD for control of growing unrest, and justification for passing extrapolated laws eliminating any risk to the democracy-capitalism business forever and hiring more killers, training them and growing their number tremendously with an overwhelming military machine; a justification for the building of more military after the failed Vietnam tentative of racial extermination under napalm and chemical horror.

That's the kind of depressing action you'll always get from people who have lifelong frustrated dreams of superiority, like senators still in roman dreams of racist conquest (they'd be happy if they could remake a civilization where they could have a guaranteed position of power for life with the prettiest women of all races in line for an orgy, remake an army with a red broom on the head strolling around anywhere in your back garden showing their superiority; bow or die!) And that's the way of a lot of powerful people; they won't kick your stuff if you bow to their version of superiority and let them play in your things, but they are not much better than dictators. What did they do those Vietnamese to be worth extermination again? They probably tried to stand upright, they were small and different, they were communists, they were not capitalists, competition of divided limited facets, politics, and an army is a tool that always needs to win over someone in the grand game of gods. I bet most people voted to end this war against communism at some point, but democracy is a game of cheaters so their opinion got circumvented, like the 95 referendum for Quebeckers, exemplary governments representing the population, that armed rebels and stuffed its own voters with cocaine to continue battling their worst fear; the possibility of a different system.

And what arguments did the U.S. used to attack Iraq at the beginning? And why did they restart the war? Sadam helped crash the world trade! And, and, he is hiding with an atomic bombs! Well, some godly inspector from the U.N or something made the affirmation he had industries for it, and the whole world believed those inspectors as saying the truth, 100% credibility, wow! But what was the truth? They found nothing, it was all a lie, a free massacre for this obscure profiting reason or that, and isn't it strange that the supposedly most "powerful" country of the earth, loaded over the head with all kind of mass death devices, be them nuclear, chemical or biological, someone a trillion times more "powerful" than "Iraq" attack and massacre a million people for nothing? Ah, sorry, it was a family dynasty thing, a personal frustration, and people voted that Saddam was the enemy, along with powerful Ben laden, and both like hiding in caves (don't worry, they probably both were worth death a thousand times, word trade or not).

The U.S. is getting good at this. Or is it target practice? they just have to scream "terrorist!" or "uranium!" to point at the next enemy the Democratic world should see as a danger like they're god deciding how humanity should behave. And sorry for the U.S, for me there is no worthy winner in this reality, so wathever the U.S. is the "winner", it is all the same to me and any country could be the "winner". And if you want you may be better saying English people than U.S. people, since they unfairly took most space on earth and they're "always" allied as one. You can see that in their attitude too, they act like they are superior, and that's particularly true for British people who are so superior they are actually racist as whole and they would very much like to be alone on earth with other races as servants and zoos of sex workers. Blatant superiority like in the movie "Total Recall 2" where only English people (countries) were good enough to survive some cataclysmic pollution (while I'm sure they are the most massive source of it by person).

To go back to Russia and cold war paranoia, Russia had to show those Americans, and its own population, that it had the strength to do as much damage, and they used the opportunity for spreading some PMBBD in their population too. Both played stupid ego child games and profited their own way from the hysteria they produced. Yet, most countries with a "different" system failed for many other reasons than just not being able to grow from their war machine, and socialism or communism, if it had been well implanted and made planetary wide, would have probably done no better than the capitalism business of emperors and senators from old Greece and old Rome, throw in some royalty and aristocracy for good measure. I will add that if democracy was in place in ancient Greece ("fair" for all I bet, except women...), then that make me very impressed by the resistance of some countries to it.

In the end I should be sorry to blast at the winner of the competition, it is only the best that won; would I be happier if the earth was getting assimilated in the Russian or Chinese language and culture? Or if one of them had taken the most space? Or spread its religion? No, if one or the other had won such a facet of the competition, then things would have been no better, it just so happen that it is English that have won the competition, in language, in space too, in religion, in culture. Still this is racism and unfairness pushed at the most extreme level, and I'll forever be against any attitude leading to unfairness. And since I usually blast the winner of such ego competition, I won't make an exception because I'm living in an English country, particularly since I'm a Quebecker and they attacked us to take over Canada. So yes English is a sour word in my mouth, and you won't discard it by saying it is past stuff; that argument is for morons only; injustice is injustice, unfairness is unfairness, if you build reality from such attributes, then the related facets of reality will have to be remade because they are based on wrongs or evils. If you steal something from me and modify it to your tastes, you don't tell me it is a past sin as a justification that I have no right to be frustrated about it, you are a manipulator and totally wrong, you did evil and you scrapped the way thing should have been if the good and fair path was chosen, the only solution is to compensate, if not, then I have the right to hate you until you are dead, not only that, but it is my responsibility to attack you until the balance is restored, minimally. But all that is useless and laughable in hell; the biggest crimes are legal while the smallest ones are terrible, with some evident massacre exceptions to close my mouth, some dictator or killer can do the job, everything is perfectly adjusted, the selection fits, one that is made to dwell in manipulations and illusions of all kind while thinking they're good because they got a job and a system they believe good to defend, and some god to admire...

And by the way, I don't much know what socialism means anymore, I abandoned all that long ago, people deciding things? I don't see that in socialism any better than in capitalism. People possessing things? I don't see that in socialism any better than in capitalism. A socialism leftist tangent in the country? I don't see how this makes things so better! So I abandon, socialism leads to mass unfairness too, we live in ego reality after all, it is a waste of my time to decorticate the opinion of all those big experts on the matter of socialism versus capitalism, have fun, get your fat pay, I don't care, too knowledgeable in their disinformation, the result is the same, I prefer to judge from self-logic, and is so for this whole book, I judge from guessing and feelings all along, is that a good enough an expertise? But everything is there, nothing changes, the momentum increases, it's just my memory that works by itself, and some new stuff too, do you think I needed that much data to quickly come to the conclusion that country competition is a bad way?

Sure I don't care the same way most people do, but a lot of what I write is nothing new, I even believe a big part was known long before the first book we have about it, it's just that superior people with the means to control and change things made their version, or twisted the words and principles of all wise men to their own profiting hands. This whole reality have been built from twisting good principles, and for as long as things are not compensated or reset, the size of the failure increases with time, exploitation and people, like a growing retribution debt, until the failure is left alone in its own failure. And whatever you do it or not the initiators have died long ago, so everybody is innocent, everybody think he's good, while a serious protest against the system means you're bad and worth a police beating and a fine or incarceration.

Instead of building the structure to experiment and create the utopia of life, we are spending our life energy for ego luxuries and country competition; we are competing to be the first to dig the ant queen hole under the pyramid. We prefer to spend and exploit all resources as fast as possible for ego gods, we spend a fantastic amount of means polluting for people who like to play Nintendo with war machines that can kill everything while we don't even know if other life with our potential exists in the universe. We are covering the earth with lodging, food and asphalt for our out of control population, we act like we think our responsibility is to make babies at the megaton and steal as much as we can, that way the rich can guarantee injustice to their offspring with the money. Yes, they have the right, you are free to give the money you "make" from exploiting and stealing the people and the earth to whomever you want! It is all a game of games and there is no purpose to it except winning, and when you have no purpose that make sense in a condemned reality then the unconscious of masses abandon and all is left to them is buying things or escape reality, ejaculate about football, life becomes entertainment since it's a game so people play the game and try to win since there is no purpose, they win for more, while the selection slowly eliminates those who want a humanity with a better purpose than playing competition games.

That was a final view, the result of not really taking our responsibility of developing and working toward making a humanity in its best form with a priority tree that makes sense. We made all king of transitory systems to stop people from forcing change until the process is inversed under the form of a system that is a condemnation from developing the tools to morph people to fit it. Half the process have been done as history developed and people tired of fighting and every one of their needs got systemized for profits. People have been incapacitated of fighting, even wishing, for something because those who systemized the means refused to do it for a different attitude, until they made laws meant to not revolt the population or break the machine that brought the like of themselves in a power position (only a pope can run Christianity, only a politician can run the democracy-capitalism business). The more "pure" a dictatorship is the sooner or faster it must give birth to something better. Or you could look at it this way; any system that grows from pure dictatorship that contains element of brainwash for control is just a way of gaining time.

This machine to control people will grow in complexity, size, cost and inefficiency with each crisis of consciousness from "its" workers. This will go on until all individual problems make someone else richer and get the economy turning along the way, whatever the inefficiency, everything will end-up as a source of profits, marketed, even love and principles will be contorted to enter a competition of profiting. As things are going this success will coincide with the end of hope, or the end of humanity if you prefer. So you start as a dictatorship arising from anarchy and go through all kind and forms of governance all based on the initial ego god dictator philosophy. The ego reality gains time with each new way of governance, new control (limitation) system that forward money unfairly to a gang, more diversity and power in entertainment, new dependences (ways to escape reality), more precise pressure selection, until humanity is condemned to a form that will persevere until the evidence of the end. Even then it will have all the tools to continue exploiting and manipulating to keep unfairness going until no humans are left. Soon we'll reach our maximum inefficiency point, when we won't even have ten percent of efficiency toward "noble" goals, and a lot of this inefficiency comes from under-products of problems created by the control systems made to exploit human life energy. As we reach too late, the civilization, with rich people controlling things, is spending more and more energy on paranoia and control, even if tech continues to develop because it's in the business model of reality, like entertainment too that will continue to attract masses who like to take as an example the best manipulators and profiteers, but that will most likely become insanity, whatever it is accepted as artistry.

This final system we have presently, the democracy-capitalism business, is a failing representative of the belief, after "trying" other possibilities, that no system can end the hope of a better world or utopist vision. But it is not true, democracy-capitalism is still a transitory system, more like a business, and it is at the end of its end and not finding, and not wanting to find or create, a better way. In fact, it is so retarded it thinks it is the best system and compete, or give war to, or demonize, anything else, and that makes it far worse than pure dictatorship as an end result. We have not reached that end yet, but you can bet that when the selection will be in face of irreversible hopelessness, the frustration level will be extraordinary, refusal of responsibility, denial, still more depression, more twisting to justify, religious insanity, who cares mentality raised to cult status, the mind of people a mess, even science will lose its sense, rotten underproducts of the ego gods ideology will pass for good leadership, everybody thinks he's better or worth more than his neighbor while most have strictly no notion of good and evil that make sense; we'll be in far more troubles than flushing an evident dictator and nothing will be able to repair the human. We must not reach the end of a system, we must not battle other systems, or compete them, we must experiment systems (I don't mean variations of the same business), that way there is an alternative, a different example, inspiration too.

Furthermore, we never explored the fact that another reality based on a different fundamental ideology could exist, not even for aliens in science fiction, since they all have the same ideology. We don't even see this reality as something, and we are too limited from PMBBD to define our reality. Can we think of another reality from scratch? An apart thing? Not a modification of the existing reality, or a sect of potato growers? Imagine landing on earth with actual technology and knowledge, but without the possibility to develop your civilization from a leadership based system. Do you think you could survive and raise civilization? Why not? What kind of civilization would be there after a few thousand years?

In other words, all governing ways to date are different ways to grow the ego pyramidal reality. This reality encompasses the whole earth so another reality can only be birthed by the good will of some already existing governing structure and since it is automatic that they'll decide they don't want to, then they must be awoken, pushed or even forced by the will of the people and expertise. Even if that can't be done since politicians are meant (taught) to think only the democracy-capitalism business is good enough to exist, like the pope for Christianity. It is a final permanent thing, to the point it is a science because with time we selected the perfect limited population to fit, that "believe" in it, that is dependent from it, that will defend it, even creating a self-reinforcing wheel of hype encouraged by adapted adults and indoctrinated in children by medias so they become part of it as young as possible. An uprising? We prefer to create rich sports and entertainment gods to admire than to make our children free of whatever condemnation. Like future people, I shouldn't pay for people's present attitude, I'm not a part of this even I live in this present too, I have a different attitude, in fact, I already paid from standing upright and persevering whatever the hell this reality served me!

Now, historically, this reality proved I must demonize it, that's all I can do "legally" to wake it up, and nobody ever succeed so I can choose the attitude I want since I can't do worse than a fail. There is no serious will from governments to use ego inflation money to create another growing reality where fairness is systemized and where people with different priorities are satisfied, and an uprising that cannot be controlled by PMBBD on television and internet will probably lead to the calling of the police or war machine for peace enforcement maybe even civil war. However, there is still a possibility of an optional reality raised peacefully, I'll write about it later and that's the emphasis I'll put my energy on, but it's a matter of good will.

You can still try to prove me wrong, but I'll do it too. For me humanity is becoming a lost cause, talking about making things truly better is pathetic, I'm wasting my time, yet, the chance exists that people will fight for a better way and I will take it because I believe there are many who are starting to understand lots of things, there is consciousness that is reaching a more profound, critical, maybe even explosive point, for those who care, but lack the time or understanding to see the extent of the troubles humanity is in. For now this will is expressed uncontrollably, or without concentration focus and endurance, it is all lost to publicists twisting everything for profits, so the only result is some egos profiting from it like a company selling shampoo bottles with a sticker of a cute panda on it saying "not tested on pandas", as a proof they're good. Then again, the necessity of reality makes it so most people do it for the money, and there is no worthy project that makes sense that people can carry massively and in harmony. I still feel there is enough of a wish to act from consciousness that there could eventually be a clash between people who care about life and good principles, and the profiteers and neutrals who prefer to wait for the end in fear of losing their possessions or be proven mentally wrong.

Good fighters are losing their strength of will to unsatisfactory options and solutions in face of the still deeper unconscious ego-god (s) ideology. But it's becoming so out of sync with life that there is potential for something extraordinary, shaking the status quo or zombification of humanity. Fighters, those who stand for principles and believe a better way is possible will have to better organize, merge, and prioritize, because I say the generations that will reap the next 100 years will either face the "end" (loss of potential) with what they have been manipulated to as a basis for their life, or they'll battle to create a different reality for new possibilities. For now, it seems the order of the day is for people to divide or fragmentalize still more, mainly on facets of living, like vegetal eaters vs meat eaters, as sources of hate and frustration that is becoming illegal to be expressed so it end-up displaced to insignificances or at the worse places like love, and stupid actions that lead to prison, all of which is excellent for this reality and its pressure selection. For that I'll thank social media outlets that took the form necessary to fit this reality, and algorithms of standardization that media science guys try to confound for independent AI as they infantilize the population, while they continue pushing that super heavy socialization is the way to go for emancipation. Evidently, half these philosophies conflict each other to produce the whole gamut of mentally conflicting superficial deficient personality diversity, so everyone thinks he's in the know and can inflate his ego in pseudo humility hiding their impotence behind anything that can give the impression of confidence. Add an amalgam of psy bullshit and you end-up with dangerously susceptible people who find pride in functioning in society without ending-up in prison as their definition of good and evil.

That being said, democracy capitalism is just a business to have more and larger egos hidden better under more complexity. Economists who can't predict shit, experts know it all know nothing, one week boasting that the economy future is wonderful while the week after they see an economic depression looming ahead, and you call that expertise? Bankers that make a multitude of stashes of money when people only need one and who make simple money dealings so complex you need a master degree in economics to understand the manipulations they use to make unbelievable profits. Why don't they tell people the true worth of their REER in 30 years with the increase in living cost and decrease in money value? The economic system is unfair and one day it will hit a wall of exponential illogism and in face of that proof of total economic philosophy failure, all they'll be able to do is to reset this then that, to erase billion dollars debts off the responsibility of the rich, surely not the poor, and they'll call it a bailout.

A reality based on satisfying the most ego (the ones most ready to do anything to gain money or fame) cannot be a fair and logical structure for the spreading of human life energy, logically, even if a pyramid of money to give work value can be a good vision in a lot of situations (no need to be an actual pyramid, but you understand that there are many levels of wellbeing in most instances and the easiest representation is a pyramid, even if they are not, "mathematically" speaking). The problem here is an emphasis that forces a situation where it's the people who think themselves superior, hot or powerful because they got some leadership or manipulation skills, like singing or babbling, who make believe they are worth massive unfairness, who control, decide and systemize thing for their kind to reign forever while being admired to eternity, working hard to take responsibility for anything positive while discarding responsibility that can affect their reputation, or using manipulation tricks to lessen responsibility (very spread attitude among feminine singers, particularly among the latest batch who are ready to fuck on stage to feed some controversy to media people and get at the fame).

The rich and powerful are somewhat pyramidal proportional to manipulation and profiting ability, to have rich and powerful you need poorer and weaker pyramidal proportional, and the more people the more pyramids of profiting. The same kind of vision applies to liberty versus means.

Next, now that the systematization is done and the people positioned, it is evident that you can't ask all those rich people to limit their appetite since the sky is their limit. This is another guarantee that this reality is condemned since it is based on a philosophy that can't change, thanks to self-limitations you can't remove without war, and life and matter limitations which we simply discard in our 100 years limited vision. We are condemned to overpopulation, family hegemonies, hypocrite injustice, indirect mental and physical violence, PMBBD, police, psy, military, religions etc. For ego people there will always be a critical justification for the need to have senseless rich and senseless poor, it is normal; that's what fairness means in their twisted minds, everything is fair because the market is their god, they even have the biggest spiritual justification with religions.

I should repeat myself about overpopulation, since well manipulated or installed people only remember what fits the mental construction they made their life dependent from. The same for those great knowledgeable "think positive" people who like to laugh at the overpopulation problem and call it a myth (mythology), isn't it strange that they never talk about poverty? Yes population "may" stall at 10 billion, but what will it take to give an adequate standard of living to everybody? Maybe 10 times more production and pollution? If not then you're happy with poor people, it's just fair? They just have to get a job? Until the earth is a dead rock and all we'll have to do is rot on earth while praying that god debark and kick its believers to a paradise, and the rest burn in hell (earth)? Sending cheap satellites around to keep hopes sufficiently high for hell's gremlins to keep smiling and believing things will get better while they're blindly walking in forever deeper shit, thanks to "think positive" morons who professionally show statistics proving things will get better and overpopulation is a myth, and science guys brandishing gadgets proving things are getting better, and superstars providing their measure of flash banging...

What will it take to colonize another planet? A tremendous amount of earth's resources? And you think the number of people doesn't influence the quantity of resources on earth? Even if the planet can sustain trillions of people, I repeat that overpopulation is always a notion you pit against things; are there too many people for sane production of food? Yes there are already too much, how many people are malnourished or only eat basic carbo? Feed them some sane food and stop the publicity for crap food! Are there too many people for the resources capacities of the earth? Yes it is already the case, think of what it will be in a hundred years, many resources will be extremely rare and because of it we will be condemned to earth, we will never be able to structure the solar system for the colonization of another planet. Are there too many people for the pollution produced? Yes, it is already the case, we already have trouble dealing with many pollution sources, this vast plastic mess in the ocean will only grow, people all over the world are ready to die to reach better places to live because their lands are scrap or they don't have enough food, will you go live in this plastic mess and eat the fishes that feed on it? And did I talk about fairness? Probably not...Are there too many people for fairness? Yes, it is already the case, if we were fair among ourselves and started giving a good standard of living to everybody, then we would need to multiply all exploitations of resources at least twice, and the same for pollution. Those who say overpopulation is a myth live too comfortably and their mind and consciousness is indoctrinated to defend evil. Overpopulation is already a condemnation to eternal unfairness, we should never have crossed the 5 billion line)

Two neighbor have been friends for a long time, each living in a medium house, until one of the two started singing so pretty you fell on your knees, it just so happens that with the skill the possibility for profiting became evident, why not profit from it? And to hell with pretty principles. Whatever happens, one finds a justification to redraw territory and remove the two medium homes to build a gigantic one and a little one, temporary it's supposed to be, while you discover you can't go back to less, instead you want more, you want servants now, but no problem, what is easier? Going back to less or just open the window to do a pretty sexy dance and open your mouth? Let's make it bigger instead, pay people to hype it in publicity, involve maximum emotivism, why not? It's your skill after all, the neighbor just had to have it too; everybody should have it to be fair no? And now you got more things to control, things to clean, so you hype the children of the little man to work on your big home so he get paid to grow his, but whatever you do, it is too late, things are systemized by an entity that took the means to control things, you have created the foundation of the economic system, everybody compete against each other on anything, your path is chosen, your home (richness) is the biggest, under it are a pyramid of different size homes, they forgot you, they forgot on what reposes the economy, you became the system and you need an army to control people, people work for you, their wellbeing is dependent from you, you need to control communication too, just to keep on being the biggest home, and now you live in a castle, you have created a systemized family dynasty, maybe a monarchy. But you are still the initial injustice, the biggest one, and eventually, when things will go really wrong, people will remember and conflicts all over the place will forever go on until you're tired of controlling, or until the consciousness reach a point where people will associate their conflicts on more fundamental arguments; those that defend and help you, and those that will want to destroy you, you used your skill to create massive unfairness, you have divided humanity, and the mess will be appropriate to size, to the extent you pushed the injustice, to the many forms you transformed it through history. It's already started, you just don't see it, but I can feel it in my lack of social stimulations, a psy science war against all expressions of violence, "love" at all sauces, and an emphasis on peace, adaptation, tolerance and acceptance is a solid barrier against losing control, and it's cool to have everybody dependent from having a job, but the entropy of life with the weight of humanity will just disintegrate everything that have been built by falsehood and unfairness, whatever living or material, even if we make it bigger than the planet, even if we have ruined and condemned the earth and humanity to our limited beliefs, even if it will take a million year, someday we'll regret and hate all the way to our ancestry, humanity and civilization will fall to a fraction of itself, and the waste will be calculated in lost potential, in human qualities as well as resources. But for now, we got sufficient momentum to end things in innocence, so don't worry.

And yes beautiful things get built in hell, no choice about it, you'd think ego people would live in an ugly place? So yes the servant, after building the house, plant flowers around it, and the more he historically worked the better his situation, until he can ask for a beautiful cycling track around the place, but it changes nothing to unfairness and evil, and since my belief is that the human don't start as either good or evil, they become depending on how their mind develop in the reality they live in, then I believe after evil is supposed to come good since truth evolution will forever put pressure. But yes, you can stay fundamentally evil by the systematization you made and the PMBBD you use on masses, to prioritize people's activities in a certain path as well as their beliefs, until the end, but, the price to pay is exactly that; the end of humanity (potential).

Next, I'm against separating everything into profitability competition spheres, this limits services to population and encourages the creation of stashes of money with associated ego people to give themselves fat pays and others that will satisfy their ego directly in the stash. This is valid for any services people use. There are no truly good reasons for banks, petroleum, entertainment, electronic, software industry etc, etc, to make private stashes of money. There are no truly good reasons to limit fair services, good food, mass transportation etc, etc. Did I mention "good" and "fair" here? I know everything is working interpedently, it's your choice to develop your systematization toward a hell or a paradise, but when you think globally, money should be a total amount of energy and skill taken from the population and it should go where it is needed in whatever amount the population decides is needed or wanted by their judgment, not the limited judgment of a precise kind of people culturally brainwashed in institutionalized nationalism who see everything as a business.

Understanding that, money, or our life energy, can be used for anything, the priority "we" decided to spend most of it on is war, entertainment, PMBBD, police and rich luxuries. A lot of research is at the level needed to protect and develop these priorities while exploiting logical and fundamental needs, like the pleasure system transformed to the reward system, security, while being used to develop new needs, fitting mentalities, condemning humanity forever more. The same for education that is emphasized to serve the system, to the point that most of it ends-up as a debt people have to reimburse, the same for knowledge that you have to pay for, whatever it is books or paying for internet, with the exception of free media manipulation channels full of publicity which minimally fits a manipulation strategy. The money could be used to increase the standard of living of the poor, to free future people from debt condemnation, clean pollution, develop fusion energy and electric roadways far faster, accelerate space development, develop free love algorithms free of profiteers, guarantee comfortable lodging, anything, and that can be seen as new jobs. Who know how more advanced we'd be today if in the 60's the emphasis of means had changed to logical priorities. Why is it so important for someone to stash money? Or to make more than 250 000$ a year? Why? Happiness is that much expensive? You think you'll convince me by saying that being rich is hard and a load of troubles not worth it while you do everything to get richer? Or that creativity is be dependent from people seeking luxury, glory and richness? No need to, instead of giving a mountain to one person, thus limiting creativity greatly, you make the mountain available to everybody and people decide to unlock the means for the creativity projects they prefer.

Next thing, I don't believe the argument saying that private businesses in competition make better quality stuff than what governments can provide, it is a bunch of PMBBD, the truth is that the government wants to discard a responsibility, or it is incompetent, no other reasons possible, governments are as capable as any business to produce quality, military grade, if they don't do it, it is because they don't want to, they want to run the business as a whole, the capitalism business, and competition is the only way they found to get quality in an unfair and profiting situation they created and have to defend for their kind to reign eternally. Businesses only thinking of profiting must have competitors to force them to innovation and more quality, that's the truth, even if this is ridiculous since you end-up becoming like your competitor one way or the other, unless you create a niche market that will end-up in competition, and in the end, there is only one winner, like the democracy-capitalism business.

Politicians want the biggest feeling of control possible while having an image of saints. Preferably by babbling, since that's the less energy hungry skill and most suffer from an attention deficit disorder reflected by their big face everywhere constantly like a brainwash, using their manipulative skills and self-confidence to do the "charismatic" thing, with media people constantly deducting all kind of unconscious messages from any twitch the manipulator developed with his team of experts on personality fabrication, fascinating, until the internet is overloaded with twitch personality autosuggestion tests like people are reading their horoscope, probably mixing the 2, with psy bullshit... I'm not talking personality tests here, there are good personality tests, like there are good IQ tests. Even if I'm not fond of these things, it seems we have been living long enough to gain competence in dividing people by an aspect of their intelligence, or their personality, something we do instinctively. While it's true that you can't ask low IQ people to become mathematicians, I don't like to further limit their potential by not giving them a chance based on a standard test. The same for personality tests; I know they work to some extent, the logician (INTP) personality fits my style quite well and I'm sure it is reflected everywhere in my work, but it's still very vague and a source of autosuggestion, in fact, if you read my work you'll find that many affirmations defining the type are totally wrong, even completely opposed to how I am, but 70% success in describing my personality is still impressive for me, even if I don't like my complexity to be categorized that easilyso I'll add that I still had to answer 100 questions of 6 choices to describe my personality and end-up being told that I'm like this and like that, let's say it removes the magic a little... The same applies to psy science, a majority of it is excellent if you see it as a tool to repair or describe the result of reality inadequacy, but completely ignoring the reality and putting every problem in the head of people like they are the problem sounds like a super grave scientific methodological failure to me...I would vastly prefer this science to heal the true sources of most of the problems people develop, while being very careful of what they call a sickness, because this incompetent science actually caused me all kind of problems all along my life from being judged superficially as this and that by people who think they know me better than myself and jealous people who need to qualify my complex and unique personality as a mental malady. And this is serious enough that a psy actually suggested a judge that I should be institutionalized in a psychiatric institute, in which situation I would have ended my life because there is no worst horror to me than being manipulated, imagine directly with medication! If I can't be myself then I refuse to be! Now ask yourself how many fine minds have been destroyed by psy through our history, seen as civilization retard, maybe not as much as religions, but both these institutions tried to destroy my life. If one or the other had succeeded at fucking-up my mind, then my work would never have existed, and I'm ready to bet that there are many like me that were destroyed by jealous people who thought themselves superior and refused to accept the failure of their judgment to keep their hegemony of intelligence understanding.

I was saying that politicians are experts at manipulative babbling (particularly liberty, democracy and finances). While I won't say babbling and doing the pretty or self-important is useless, I say it is not worth a better standard of living than manual working. Politicians do have a use, they do add laws for selective complexity, justify the military by pointing at enemies, go to national funerals, change tax rates of people, objects and import-exports, test their influence and authority in country competition, and better develop toward their liking the biggest bricks under them (controlling institutions which in turn control a hundred more big institutions; all the tip taken together make the blunt of the control structure, the democracy-capitalism business), by changing the bosses that pisses them off, except for the political system itself, unless there's a majority somewhere, but the guy is still dependent from a big batch of advisors, call them what you want, lobbying gangs included, and they are limited by all kind of laws and systems made to keep the system invincible, media people included, and god know the influence of media people is important, probably as much as politicians themselves...

One of the very minimal jobs of the governing structure should be to decide and permit the construction of infrastructures that everybody needs. It is their job to distribute grants for communication, hospitals, lodging etc, what we call services. But they don't do it, they let all basic needs in the hands of competitive profiteers. So what are they doing with the money? You understand this word "service"? I don't think so, you don't give services to create profitability structures! Services are not meant to be put in the hands of ego people! You don't give service to create jobs and rich gangs! You give service to help people! You create infrastructures to help people! And once the structure of the service is built and the people have given money to pay back the spending, the farthest you can go is to get people that use a service to pay for its upkeep.

People don't want to be "given" jobs, they want services and help. They're supposed to want to relax, do things they like, take care of things and people around them, feel useful, help make a better world if they can etc, etc. give them money and that's what normal people will do, unless the reality cheated them of something. If they're frustrated, manipulated, exploited, brainwashed, bullshitted, made dependent, or had to develop extreme individuality traits or lacks, handicapped judgment, displaced frustration etc, etc. if people's unconscious feels any of this and you give them money, in most instances it is going to backfire negatively upon themselves or others one way or the other unless they consciously strive to try to act "good".

Good people like to bring services to others, some like so much to make people happy that they'll make a burnout working too hard, or they'll do it for a ridiculous pay, a vast majority of people are supposed to like to work fairly. The only way to disgust people of working fairly is to historically encourage and reproduce crappy characters and give them advantages, or to always profit from them, or to disgust them profoundly of something, consciously or unconsciously, to make simple things complex no end, or to make love difficult, or to leave them no time for too long, even skipping steps in their mental development. This reality is so in conflict with the ways of life that we must continually work under all kind of pressures with ego dreams, just to feel we are alive and have signification.

Next we see industrialists who only see people's salvation through an increase in production, attained by over consummation, in turn gotten from publicity propagation, short life garbage diversity from competition, cheap workforce to rivals automation, for humanity monetization and planetary pollution. It rhymes! That doesn't concern all businesses evidently, and I wouldn't doubt that you need to have the profiting attitude to make money, it's in the business model of reality, and each country got its ways of dealing with people, and psy are everywhere, and work conditions of the selection has become a factor in the country competition, and living at a higher standard than cavern times has become an argument, while media people and internet systems broadcast inside their liberties, and iron, plastic and aluminum production forever increases, the same for miniaturization and automation, so that cheap stuff people have to buy repeatedly gives the impression of a better standard of living, while half the pollution of the planet is in people's homes as practically useless accumulation, while colors and containers and clothes diversity constantly changes so that people who don't buy "marque" stuff have the illusion of being unique and different, all is missing are zodiac people doing line of products depending if you're a fish or a scorpion...

Industrials and big businesses there for the money, condemned to satisfy investors and shareholders, as a result of salivating at millions or as an option to save their business when too much money disappear in smoke. Doesn't this way of doing things invalidates the most basic capitalism principle? And what about the influence of lobbying gangs, why do industrialists need them? In fact, the way all capitalist systems deal with money proves that the market as a reflection of offer and demand is a fallacy, while governments put taxes wherever they want to adjust thing. Then when they end-up ruined, those poor industrialists who were so incompetent at managing money go bum their greatest helper and defender, the government, which has always been a leech to them, taking "their" money, and they want infinity, all of it! And the government and its institutions and all the luxury structures to serve and protect them are not much better.

Even if you adjusted things it would change nothing to the process of forwarding most means to the competition of the best manipulators and profiteers. The end result is always the same in this mess in the name of competition. Where is the money? In big stashes under the control of this person or that, probably a banker, and whatever you adjust things it ends up as the same, even if you take it from their pockets most of it will end-up in the pockets of someone else. Everything works in harmony in hell, even the poorer who are getting the whip, with serrated teeth, dream of replacing them in their jealousy, just to end up living the same kind of life, doing the same kind of evil, the king is dead, long live the king.

So there are no arguments, and I talk simply to skip writing 5 pages. This mentality where people can compete to be worth an infinity of money should never have existed, there is a limit to human worth whatever you do. Is it too late to repair this? Do you think it will happen by voting for this guy or that to run the business? Do you think a hundred protesting groups under the control of the police will succeed? While they militarize the police and politicians see them as a source of candy distribution to look good for the next election? They even need protester, they even need terrorists, to decide the form of evil, to divert attention from the biggest fundamental sources of it, to always have a fat base of fearful people defending the system that provide the security the system made them dependent from! Scared to lose what the system make them work too hard to get, with TV people to historically imprint the mind of the population with heavy dramatization and a constant production of assassinations for police and psy glorification, for entertainment, paranoia, fear, peace, pressure selection, until the system is invincible with 100% of people adapted to it.

When there will be nothing else to take from the earth, when we'll have covered most of it with asphalt and buildings and cars and plantations in the name of profits. When we'll be overloaded in the trash industrials manipulated us to buy with publicity, all those new gadgets that never last long before ending in the garbage, when we will live in fear of the wrath of nature because profits is their highest priority, what will they do? What will be their solution? No solution? No responsibility? They only find solutions that bring new profits? More jobs? More structures? More growth?

It's not people who asked companies to spread publicity everywhere like a brainwash, it is them, they'll even pay to force their publicity on people, it's an investment, they need people to buy their stuff, they create demand, so the market is not a natural market like capitalism magic, it is based on manipulation ability, and they'll use any PMBBD they can lay their hands on to make you buy, their goal is to make you say "I need it" or "a want it". And who decided the liberties of publicity? God? We are condemned because someone decided its ways and brainwashed the whole planet to it? Then they'll further influence offer and demand with all kind of laws and you wouldn't dare ignore all those commercial treaties protecting this business or that in this country or that...Offer and demand bullshit... The truth is that the economy must grow until people die massively, and that's already the case when you think that a million people suicide every year so much the system is human and works well and psy are competent... They are guaranteeing our end and they'll put the blame on anything else than the ego competition that bought them in a position to live in luxury and admiration. They made their effort by producing green crap cars that are not while pushing people to buy as many as possible. Some really do want and actually sacrifice or limit their standard of living for a better environment, but you want greenery? The environment is really your priority? Then stop the publicity and let people seek what they need in appropriate categories. The truth is that most don't really care except for image, even when they're already rich over the head with their recipe satisfying their vision of success, untouchable like gods in fact. So if we want to kick them we won't find them because they'll be well hidden in some luxury hole or yacht, as they continue spending millions every year buying we don't know what, surely some good stuff, and paying for we don't know what type of human love, sexuality and intelligence that will spread in the future in a lot of instances, like the fat problems we have today, deforming humanity, breaking it, the mind first then the body. And that applies to PMBBD repetitions; new information takes many thousands years of pressure or selection and encouragement to get a life response to the truth you are trying to make. For now you can laugh at our pathetic insignificance, oh untouchable and indispensable industrial, don't worry, you're not the ones passing its time dying, you're too superior.

It's supposed to be the responsibility of those who took the means to make things better, that's an unconscious logic, responsibility proportional to means because means are reflected in human actions and human actions form reality. That's in part how you create pressure selection, by deciding where the means go (how high consciousness energy moves and where and the value of it).

It seems all we have to do is blast the upper half of the pyramids to be done with all problems the way I'm going, but I'm just doing the proportional to means, and it's not the solution to nothing, it would easily grow back since the selection is on the momentum of building them eternally with the same ideal from the same systematization. We could eliminate the extremes of richness and distribute the surplus on all kind of things, to become what we want, but with today's population, ways of thinking and living, they'd buy 2 homes 3 cars and 6 TV, while passing their time in planes; the selection would ruin the planet, end the world. Anyway, you'd still need to stop the ego momentum, and even if you destroy everything, you still wouldn't stop it since people need to understand to the point of crying while expressing their responsibility, and that's impossible for the current selection that is too strongly brainwashed in competitive bullshit, full of pride, and the responsible are not them.

In fact, the system so invincible because the selection is perfectly brainwashed, that soon they'll work by themselves to make the utopia for the rich. Worse, people will quit vast cities to go back village style because these places are full of opportunities! Profiteers will debark with green ideas, businesses will flourish there, they'll make tons of beautification projects in the name of superficial diversity, because, you know, the economy is highly based on growth, and the green revolution will switch this growth from cities to towns, and the selection will find tons of pride there, as they work to develop the heavy socialization and human contacts dreams of current psychology, since sex is not as "developed" in villages...

I think people understand what I mean by "selection" it's the resulting from pressures from reality, a bit like natural selection, but artificial by the emphasizes of encouraged human attitudes. This process started long ago, by wrongly comparing ourselves to evident animal attitudes which we are not, tribe people do that a lot, then we manipulated the pleasure system onto the reward system, to exacerbate superiority competition and ego related attitudes. I understand that maybe humanity had to go that way, but this philosophy should have ended long ago. Evidently, when I talk selection presently, I talk about "modern" people, I'm not talking about poor people living in the woods or the mountain, these people, often living in very difficult places or situations, are more justified, by the environment they live in, to have less up to date opinions or vision of things, but they are still under influence from the pressure selection process, why do you think they're all Catholics? Eventually they'll be "modern" people too...

Now, the well adapted selection is surely not the only ones full of pride and vanity, even the worst murderers and rapists are inflated to explode these days, a fundamental wellbeing function of an ego reality. Me? As much as I'm proud of the path I have taken of standing for good to the best of my abilities, I'm ashamed of the little I can accomplish with my human capacities, to feel sane in mind and body while not being able to do more to help life than writing, it's like a big and never ending justification to do nothing. I don't know if I'll be able to live all my life this way, and nobody loves me, no fan club contrarily to rapists and murderers, but I won't cry over it no? We're in hell after all, normal...Maybe I'm a little too pessimistic, maybe I'll be sufficiently competent and people will start to understand and appreciate how I see things, but I doubt it, maybe when I'll be old, or dead, I'll be made as big as an entertainment god like Michael Jackson... As for the reality, you could try to drop its fake image, then kick it around, but it is worse than of no use if everybody works to help it...The solution is either another planet where another reality could be started, or a just formula accepted by the ego reality to permit the birthing and growth of another reality totally independent from any influence from it, or, as a last resort the imposition by force of another reality with another system of control than godly vision, since it immediately initiate the building of unfair systematizations.

What is a pyramid anyway? The first image that comes to mind is an impressive old and ugly Egyptian triangular structure with ants tunnels and a queen bunker, where people who have been ripped-off from their independence with indoctrination go die huddling themselves with their guru. That's exactly what it is, and whatever you glorify it, that's what's imprinted in our unconscious. The pyramids were built for the kings or the "gods" of a population that lost its mind, and it is associated to death. It was a protection and a bunker-tomb for a god built by its dependent population who believed to death in their religion and like every civilization that built pyramids, they spent their life energy blindly or stupidly and died. Those glorified old Egyptians were so intelligent they developed their brain solely for their system which is incredibly stupid. They built these "marvelous" (sarcasm) pyramids without thinking about the wheel, making a bad trip about death from suddenly gaining such low level consciousness.

But nothing beats another pyramid building tribe that killed and decapitated to bits thousands of people for their gods from the top of their pyramids of death with admiring workers believing they were doing the good thing. The old Indus too didn't survive their condemnations, pyramids condemn people all the way to people not born, they can't be moved, they say to life and the earth "we are gods, we take this place as our possession and nobody will remove us from here, ever, this bit of land is our possession forever, dead or alive, and these wonders are a proof that our system is the best of the universe". They made the most formidable bad trip about death and died like the old Egyptians, unable to go farther in their understanding, their vision limited to encourage what was already there, their best system, forced and condemned to it by their godly beliefs. And that's still true to this day, people condemn the land with themselves and the best solution to remove them is still death. And what if you need to move people to make a new reality?

Like every others tribe that built pyramids for whatever reasons, be it to be nearer their gods, or to make big show off from sacrifices to their gods, to entomb their godly cadavers, or to take the example of ants, they all died because they entombed themselves in their mind and didn't see the world as a land of possibilities (different from opportunity...) they explored in function of ego competition, to make themselves unchangeable. One thing's for sure, whatever the way they died, they didn't invest enough in alternatives that could prevent their failure. Some were sure of themselves or their invincibility, that they fought their fears by trusting their fate to their gods every years; me too I have a few entities doing things up there, and down there, and out there, but they're not very interactive you know, and it's logical like that... I say they probably understood that some factor would terminate them directly or indirectly, but they fell into denial until too late like in too late is too late, and you can bet that that their mentality or vision of life was never seen as wrong or worse, a problematic factor! They ignored or eliminated people who saw differently as bad independent or individualists, they continued to go the way of their superior, working stronger and smiling more than ever, and no suicide, there's this tendency to end-up in hell when you suicide in a best system, or they did not mention the suicide statistics in their the hieroglyphs... I will concede that in most cases they had no choice, and pyramids are not necessary, let's say it's a natural for leadership without constraints to end-up taking forever more advantages, until the chief can fuck anybody in the tribe...But still, I would prefer to see vestiges of impressive walls, grain silos, irrigation, schools, farmlands etc, than pyramids of death.

I understand that people glorify the philosophy of old "civilizations", since we're presently in the same pattern, but I make the affirmation that all those pyramid builders failed because their leadership structure became corrupt, or is it evil unfair? The same who probably dictated what was evil to their population as a tool to control them... but being a cute pharaoh doesn't make one automatically good. Too many palaces, too many death, too many hidden lies, an indoctrination that conflicted with logic, the truth got back to them, they reaped what they sowed; they were all evil from top to bottom, they failed. Even today, instead of changing and building in function of change or malleability, people build to condemn themselves to their end from their maximum ego competition; even those who stand with a different attitude are on their knees mixing cement, probably for less...And we're very strong on the palace aspect of things too, luxury homes, luxury bunkers, luxury jets etc.

Today, scientists of old stuff still go completely wild over pyramid builders, they're in total admiration and subjugation of people who are example of failure, death, craziness, ignorance, stupidity. Many savage tribes were far more intelligent and they are still alive to prove it, they survived because they integrated life, moved with it, whatever they were no better in many other facets, until Catholicism dropped a big bullshit near the fire, flabbergasting their imagination with beasts, angels, witches, roman empires, and Jesus the super hero of misery that ended-up crucified. (That same JN character that dealt with masses like magic, sending messages to the powerful and all) guaranteed emotions around the fire for sure. Why don't they make a big fuss about such survivors that, for the most part, don't seem to want this reality at all? Why do they spend so much money admiring the worst examples of failure and death? And you can't say I'm creating paranoia, that ego and controlling people don't end civilizations for their power-trip when you got so many examples around; it only prove that we are ready to do it again, we learned nothing, and people will die massively because manipulative brainwash forced them to a system that was unfair from the beginning, and known as such.

So I talk about this reality as a pyramidal reality because it is made of a thousand different condemning systems of all size and functions that act from a schema of leadership akin to pyramids, all seeking immortality of the mentality that successfully made them. Some are good under that form, most not. Yet, they are all part of a single invisible pyramid that is the reality; the ego-gods ideology. Well, I could say that life is not a pyramid, it is a wheel, the bigger the pyramid the less potential at movement it has, a wheel got more potential to move than the biggest planet stuck and condemning pyramid. Now, what will we do when we have machines that do everything for us? We'll feel bad about our laziness in our twisted mentality and start building our next marvel; a mountain (pyramid) higher than the Everest? We'd need a higher point to feel more on par with our ego god, to be seen? The Everest is a classic now (Did someone ever climb the Everest without anybody ever knowing about it? No? Taught so. Try that one as your next mountain, it will imprint your soul very differently) I hope someday we understand that a lot of things become better when we work less under all king of PMBBD pressures, maybe that's the way to equilibrium in a lot of things beginning by the resources renewing of the earth, when we stop thinking that we must fill the planet to absolute capacity with ourselves in the name of profitability. But we need many people that work very hard in this reality unless we feel totally inefficient on a large scale at any "noble" goals; still, 10% of today's population is a lot of people.

And I repeat that the main problem with pyramids, or any work structure for that matter is the attitudes encouraged by the circulation of means. A pyramid good use is to concentrate specialization, that is valid for leadership as well as any specialization, see it as concentrating specialization time. That's the best use you can make of the pyramidal representation, to optimize efficiency of specialty or expertise value, but it absolutely doesn't mean the top is more valuable than the bottom, it depend on many things, and the worst you can do is close accessibility to others to protect your position and profit from it. You can separate the top position in many, or you can have many that fit it, that's better than a tremendously expensive god from whom the whole pyramid is dependent from, and there is always the goal of it...

And sorry if I don't talk like a connoisseur, I'm not a political scientist or expert and I know nothing of what I'm talking about and I have the pleasure of saying it, contrary to those very knowledgeable and learned people with triple size IQ (Imaginary Quotient?). I can't be scared to realize that I have lost so much energy going at school and universities limiting my mind in all kind of ways. So go ahead, scout the world to find studies that confirm how much your system is the best and everything is forever getting better, defend your reality, earn your pay! I'll do better by discarding it all. What I know is that there is the liberalists, and the conservatists, the republican party, the democratic party, so much partying things go left and right, depending on how affected the judgment of the people is, as they vote democratically, if they are taken by the hand adequately.

What I care for is life, I don't care about the possible variations within ego reality and I don't like limited people who think they found the car of humanity they can steer left or right; I am not left or right, I prefer to be good or bad, how about it? I strive for fairness and the thriving of life or I strive for unfairness and the destruction of life. Anyway, the world is all over in the same competition of unfairness, only extreme right exist because it is a world of profiteers, a competition of who profits the most from others, a race to suck the life energy of others as much as possible, a competition to manipulate other people's liberties with PMBBD and violence through history. To the point that the selection is final; you are all rightists, all a bunch of final indoctrinated ego people without the slightest notion of fairness or liberty or love and no good vs evil judgment for sure either, none.

The same for liberals, conservators, democrats, republicans, all the same extreme rightist stuff with a variant, and that's logical, the system exists to give this result, to enrich some by profiting proportional to manipulation intelligence, it's a competition of manipulation and profiting. Sometimes I think the left stuff is just there to calm people after too much pressure, with a placebo illusion, like they let someone who will do a few insignificant fair actions run the business when people are on the verge of revolt, better than reap a big setback in violence, and the years pass by while the system adapts people better and becomes more invincible. You can prone completely contrary political direction, it means nothing, only that you're adjusting money toward this or that, while the fundamental grows, get more invincible in big talking and diplomacy, more competitive weapons and powerful war machines, more hypocrite control. And I won't listen to any scientist or experts of the politician system; they are all at maximal PMBBD expertise, they are people that speak left, right, like they are the drivers of a civilization that can turn around, or like they're so straight good and true that they only need to nudge the steering wheel a little left, then a little right, big pride, big self-esteem, big knowledge, no doubt they are in total admiration of their system, no doubt they make lots of money, no doubt they have a social spot where they can laugh a lot when they slack their ties...One thing's for sure, you can bet no political expert, nobody with a tie in fact, will take the means to change things, worse their attitude and continual presence is another manipulation tool to condemn people final. Under them you got the greatest mass, but even if many people know the system is all based on PMBBD competition, they do nothing, it's a battle just to survive comfortably and they are too divided on cosmetics and wrong priorities, while the truth is twisted to disinformation by pseudo intellectualities seeking a quick profit from whatever insignificance. Most people just find ways to not really care enough in their vision of things, for a panoply of different "bad" reasons, or I could simply say they have far "better" things to do, many hassles that are meant to be while they should not, systemized evil in little characters.

Have fun, I'm so out of it from so long ago I'm as well say eternity, and at this point, I'm as well abandon, let this wonderful reality exploit and destroy everything, I can do nothing except depress. But no, I'll still stand upright since you failed to rape my mind, or fill it with bullshit, even if you attached me to your condemnations. You want to bring me to death? I'm forced to follow? I'm dependent? I'll try to convince those who still got some sense and will while I walk behind, get them out of their fearful torpor where chains are useless, tell them the why, and the how; choose to go in the precipice or not, and when it will be near, I'll remove my chains and ask to be given the chance for the last time, then the battle will start. You want to drag me in the precipice with you? I took my life to grow wings! And these don't appear suddenly in front of the precipice, so those who understood what I talked about, associated to help, you'll have to turn around and kick all the rest there instead. Those who led humanity here by your attitude, your godly certitude, those who walked blindly, this is your tomb, where your failures ends, dust to dust, your gods and all your servants, those that defended and encouraged you, can go in too, they're too corrupt, a totality of arguments had no effect. As for us, we take another path where we won't come back to this place ever.

How many potential civilizations have been destroyed by ego people building temples (luxury places, bunkers)? Probably they all crumbled because of systematizations made to defend their unfairness, and what they leave behind are piles of bricks people worked very hard to fit flush, Ah! Making broken tablets talking about gods and sovereigns and big ruining ceremonies he too. Nowhere do we find something else, nothing else than the ego-gods ideology has ever been truly tried because manipulators and profiteers are the first, dividing and systematizing any opportunity with unfair rules advantaging themselves in their competitive view of life, until everything ends-up twisted and hidden and manipulated (to "protect" people, or to gain a competitive "advantage"), while the powerful PMBBD machine does its play of pressures, stamping "proven good" on this ass or that, gods who are not perfect for sure, just a reflection of their selection, just good enough to think they are worth infinity.

Whatever happens in this reality we will make the same mistake again and again, superiority-inferiority competition as the fundamental pillar of civilization, to end up in the same hole, call it a black hole or dust to dust. So nobody should talk politics to me, it is a far worse than worthless complexity, like the economic system. A lot of the complexity we developed to date is worse than a weight, it's a condemning weight. Once the democracy capitalism business is in place you are condemned to it forever because it is a structure that systemizes everything and everybody for self preservation and profiting, and it considers itself the final thing.

After a thousand years making laws to protect it or fit people to it, it has become the equivalent of a religion, since the laws of the system now decide. The governments try to push things inside the law, if one tries to do a risky change to the structure, the Congress or the opposition (the system) will invalidate it or make it insignificant and a too big change would be seen as incompetence and he will be kicked out for a more adequate one who will be happy to keep things as they are, just to be in the place of the other, or he will get shot by the brick he wants to kick. But if he does take truly serious measures, his term is too short to do anything else than defend himself for the next election which he'll probably lose and the successor will twist the start at something the other one did, probably to save money, rendering it almost useless in reaching the goal the original man had in mind. All you can do is pass laws that will make the system more invincible, or laws to get more money, or to tame people, while building palaces... So in most cases, governments solely act as "mediators" between already implanted systems of control and exploitation, reinforcing the system while adding some weight to their view; I don't call this leadership, or ability to act in the best fashion. The system gets reinforced with time as the better fitting get more encouragement, pressure selection, and the process for people to understand the complexity of it forms their intelligence to defend it, if you are lucky and they don't see it as an opportunity to act with superiority. Then TV people pools the forever stronger selection, opinion pools where you choose between given options, even if they say they represent the population, in fact they divide it.

And it changes nothing that there are a few good leaders passing through, it's too much of a fight to change a little thing that evil will contort anyway. Whatever the effort, even if some governments work hard to control legal criminals stashing money to keep the criminal economic system functioning, they'll fail in the end since even themselves are ready to destroy humanity to prove no other system can exist. In the end, even if anybody can be a politician and run for presidency, in super bullshit ideal theory, the selection process (including the indoctrinated selection) will reject all those that don't walk the line of the glorified business or reinforce it still more so it can stay eternal; like popes do within their institution. Its "if all else fail" form, if the system is not patented well enough to select well, or if someone turns out to be a risk factor to its integrity, is what happened to the Kennedys. So whatever you want to believe your Kennedy was a saint that would have turned hell around, in the end, he was nothing else than someone stuck dealing with powers beyond his ability to change, an invincible and eternal profiting monster which attacks anybody, one way or the other, who has a chance at trying something truly different, or even just truly try making things truly better. He was probably killed by people who feared he would do a "stupid" thing, but I'm giving him a lot of credit for nothing here, I doubt he was better than anybody else, maybe a more charismatic member of that unfairly rich family. After the elimination of the risk we even got a wonderful rallying, emotive or touching speech of PMBBD to keep things as they are! No way out of it in this reality until the end, even if you get half people willing the other half will invalidate it, 50/50, divide to reign, don't try something really seriously good, just get elected and do your best inside the system tolerances, and let it reach its end.

Everything that exists is not because of your good system though, humans systemize themselves one way or the other, then all they need to develop technology is time proportional to effort, until they reach some limitation. And you don't "find" a system, it's not hidden or a discovery, you create it to make the human and life shine. The system we made will end-up as fantastically costly versus the time it lasted, most pyramidal old tribes lasted longer while preserving the earth and life far better, and still gain more and more knowledge, technologies and entertainment, which, as I already said, only need time and systematization to develop, so it is not an argument to say that such things wouldn't have developed within another systematization. Now, I know a lot of resources are needed to update people's standard of living as things develop, but in the end it will still be the most costly system that ever existed for the good it did, and the worst price will be to come, particularly if there is no change in mentalities.

Now, I don't think I have a problem in the head, but I never felt some politician represented me, not only that, but a few factors and experiences made me feel like my kind of opinions are continually selected out or rejected or unwanted; who do they pool to make final affirmations like it proves something? Not people like me, I've never been pooled except for stupid things, then I did a bit of facebook to realize my opinion was inadequate, as a matter of fact, the internet is squarely full of censorship for opinions like mine. As an example, I went to a few sites posting movies and I simply was unable to mention, in the comment section, that the movie was "not to my tastes" if the movie contained religious encouragements, I couldn't even say "it contains religious stuff" because there was nothing saying it in the synopsis. I hate movies that twist science or facts or history to insert religious stuff (different than magical stuff not meant to gain adepts), and I hate when they don't mention the movie is encouraging a religion, which is the case for a lot of movies these days, it's like a hypocrite manipulative war against the mind, truly, go ahead, start counting the movies with religious related mentalities in them! And they do exactly like porn movies; they don't say it's full of sodomy, no, you got to be surprised by it, so you still get some measure of influence or brainwash even if you don't want it. To go back to commenting movies, they do let a few people say they don't like the movie because it contains religious stuff, for good measure, but the ratio doesn't make sense, even when you consider that believers wouldn't miss an opportunity to say they like it. I'm certain it is manipulation from censorship, it doesn't reflect the reality at all, and if it does, then we're doomed. And this is not even an argument, the argument is that I have totally failed to say it, and I tried maybe 10 times on 2 different sites, while I can say positive things as much as I want. So it's not because there is something wrong with my account or my way of saying things (can you express your freedom of speech any more minimally than saying "I didn't like it" or "not my type of movie" or "it contains religious related stuff"?). And the comment is not removed, no, the comment simply appear like it is accepted, then I close the site, re-open it a day later, and ho and behold, the comment is simply not there, no mention of any broken house rule or anything, it just vanished. And exactly the same applies to some news sites who like to act like their pooling reflect what the population thinks while I can't post a negative comment that I judge as bringing new factors to the "discussion". I can only post comments that are going toward what people generally said, even if there are always exceptional comments going against the general view, and bitching or stupid comments are mostly accepted. What I mean is that their manipulations don't only concern your opinion or the unwanted factors invalidating their bullshit, their manipulation concern the weight of those comments, the quantity. And I'm not talking about space limitations that greatly limit intelligence; to explain new factors well you often need a lot more than a few lines. And I'm not talking about the score thing related to opinions which is so ridiculous it is not even worth existing. So I abandoned, too much hypocrite manipulations and censorship, people like me are selected out, they don't have the right to an opinion, whatever it is expressed respectfully or not; they must conform or be selected out. Just don't forget I'm talking about movies with religious encouragements in them and news sites, in my experience, about the comment facet. And I know YouTube is different, even if there is still censorship there, but YouTube pass (barely), news sites fail (catastrophically), on this facet. The question is; who is supposed to represent truth? And don't forget "Hollywood" and most news providers are highly influenced by governmental agendas.

Back to my things, once this system is in place it controls everything and it become incredibly hard to find and track the possibilities for overtures for such a project as trying a different way of doing things. Most of the changes will work toward the growth, defense and survival of the system, so even something that looks different will be a deception, meant as an investment to keep a will under control at a lower cost, like religions. I could say that democracy-capitalism is the final "utopist way" of the ego-gods ideology, the success of it, and will lead humanity solar life to failure, if it's not already the case. The people who made it invincible indebted the whole future of humanity to have the appropriate selection to fit their view of the world, to create our history, the form of humanity, they want to take the credit for humanity existence, make it dependent of their limited vision, as they confound self-inflation manipulation and profiting for leadership...But yeah, you can lead humanity to failure, and you can end-up the winner, if you see survival as the last one standing on the pyramid of your dead slave humanity that carried you as a god, but the reward may not be to your tastes, and that applies to past people as much as present and future ones, followers as well as leaders, it's all a matter of what you stood for while living, what you could have known versus what you willfully ignored versus your capacities versus reality, all in all, what you cared about...

Our present democracy serves only to hide the egos controlling everything, all the violence, all the bullshit, all the manipulation all the problems that persist to exist in this reality, all of them are the result of some people taking unfairly, or they end up growing an ego somewhere, a legal criminal or gang in most cases. Our civilization is the bottom line necessary for massive and widespread exploitation and profiting to enrich some out of proportion, bringing them always more expensive entertainment or food, or exaggerated and mindless admiration, or the most beautiful sexy or cute ego "women" to fuck, or the most exaggeratedly expensive panoply of transportation means, or the most expensive possible voyages, or the most fantastic homes or marriages, or the biggest stash when they don't know what to do with it or don't have enough time to spend it. 1/4

Before continuing, I'll say that I'm sorry for all of you economist, but I absolutely don't see money like you're being taught about it at school in this reality. Not only that, but there are a few aberrations that don't even make logical sense to me, except as tools to extirpate money from whatever source to forward it to unfair people, to create systematizations for profiteers, for some people to feel superior with positions to prove it. Everything is simply a game of who steals the most life energy from who, or who is superior to whom, the ideal of humanity is to profit from everything, all what exist is there because someone profits from it, and sorry for the people standing for good principles, they are just tools to save profits.

Present money has nothing to do with people, meaning people are still at the age of rock concerning money understanding, or the way money was dealt with was immediately seen as worthless in the unconscious of people from the beginning. People knew right away it unfairly profited some senseless, while putting other in misery. People abandoned right at the start, saw it as a worthless fight, bowed to superior people in admiration, and we are missing the most fundamental principle that can form a good civilization. And since people like me never had the means, it is condemned to massive death if it tries to change things. That is so because we don't know; we competed other options to inexistence, we didn't try to develop other ways to have an idea if people could live well in a different system not based on ego competition. We're just a massive exploited tribe of expendable interdependent pressure selected intelligence facets.

We are robots. Some will say robots don't get money, but that's still how it works, it's just that to have the robot come back tomorrow without effort, you just give it fuel (money) so it can go repair itself (eat and watch entertainment) , and build other robots (reproduce and go get a specialty). But money is not a cold materialistic thing produced by machines, we forgot that money is human life energy and nothing else. People will have to care about money with their life, because money is human life energy time worth. That may be weird to you, if you're well brainwashed to see money as a cold monopoly thing, but that's not hard to understand and it's the truth, I'm sure a child can understand that, and he'd automatically have more worth that any adult of this reality that don't even understand this simple fundamental truth on which a good civilization can exist since I've never, ever in my whole life heard someone mention something like this, even though people never end talking about money.

Government's "money" they say, including their pay, needs and status of living is people's life force, not "their" money like they're Santa clauses; they take it from people spending energy working. And they should stop talking like infrastructures and services are things they buy; they are built and serviced by people's life force; money is not a government invention and production, and people are not robots in a package coming from China! They are parts of a living and working entity and nobody is above that. We have to stop seeing people as exploitable things or resources (human resources).

So money is not a government's or bank possession like they want to make us believe, even in games like monopoly, like they are the good guys permitting money to exist' that's a manipulation lie of the worst kind, money is human life energy time transformed to numbers nothing else, and a bank is simply an institution that people and the government needed to deal with the complexity of it, to make it standard and fair, but instead, since they ended playing with the numbers, they systemized its flow for themselves and their gang while keeping the strict minimum in the pockets of people, slavery their bottom line. They developed unfairness at the most extreme level, making invincible criminal organization that humanity is dependent from all over the place. With the philosophy to keep it that way.
But they failed their first law of existence and they are evil beyond any measure for the unfairness they created and the unbelievable system of manipulation they made to subjugate humanity to the power they gained from controlling human life energy, anybody that know money is people's energy spent at jobs and sees it as a competition of who takes the most is in this category, the same when you see misery while you live in luxury. Everything is there, what system those dealing with the life energy of the people created. The goal is to make a good monetary system, not an evil unfair one, so the current financial system must, and I say must imperatively, be reformulated in totality. But they'll kill you instead, ego people have their paradise after all, they sure won't be rewarded in after death, whatever they worked hard and raised a family, like all animals...We're talking human life energy, blood will spill, since it is not a building that failed to do its job, it is people who don't see unfairness as a bad thing, particularly those who had the responsibility of making a fairness system for people to exchange their life energy as numbers, and not only they failed their minimal job, but they squarely developed the most evil vision and condemned humanity to it! Maybe such a failure, even at planetary extent, is not a crime to you, since gang members encourage each other to see their evil as normal, but not to me. Maybe I could be less hard, say you can believe in anything you want, since people can believe in any bullshit if it's distributed by a minimally competent manipulator, if that could be some kind of argument, yes, even the most evil people can believe they are good in a sect, but what eliminates all my compassion and pardon, at least for the responsible, is that they made exactly the contrary; they made the life energy system as unfair as they could, and they are part of those that profit unfairly from it at ridiculous levels, for themselves, because thery play in it, why not? And logically, if there is a best path and a worst one and you can choose, then you can bet they developed the philosophy to defend it too, which is ego competition raised at all levels of humanity. As for people, what do you want more than such a total failure to redo the job? What do you want more as a proof that they are criminals of the worst kind? Eh? Not your responsibility to fight evil? A new institution should be created to deal with the life energy of people, and the ones working the institution should never get any benefit from dealing with the money, they must get a medium ordinary pay decided by people and no more.

Banks are the institutions that systemize injustice to reality the most and they should be the most attacked, with piss, paint, bombs, tanks, missiles, kamikazes, and the biggest bombs go for the richest and most criminal, so while Swiss banks and fiscal paradises get visited by mother bombs, all others banks get themselves dusted in collateral good! Turn off the police for them! No need to waste more time and money on them, they are among the biggest criminals of humanity, and giving them a trial is a waste of resources for their willful "innocence"! People should be proud to attack banks! But wait a minute! Didn't I tell you not to listen to everything I say? Those institutions are intrinsic to ego reality, war against yourself, they are systemized with everything, they are the financial basis of this reality. So, even if attacking them can enforce a new mentality, and some things are born to die, you cannot attack them, particularly once they're systemized, so forget it, even if the foundation is no good.

Just don't think you're good for controlling the flow of human energy (money) the way you do, all of you who made this financial system, you are a pathetic example of evil because your egotism and displaced pride work against the reason for your existence, you don't battle entropy, you help it, and since no argument in the history succeeded at systematizing human energy flow differently, then only violence and war is left to gain back some sense, to put better mentalities in control of it.

Why do you think the system crash? Because it's a system the best profiters made for themselves, and even if it is supposed to be protected from ending-up in an economic crisis form opportunists messing everything in their brainless exaggerations, wasting billions, it will always go through one crisis after another, and the sole directly responsible are people wanting infinity, they steal and steal, and steal, while singing capitalism inconsistencies, and when their whole business will crash they'll pollute away in their jets loaded with gold leaving responsibility behind. But you better be careful running away with your humility stash next time, all of you, rich in their luxury bunkers (homes), you will be on a list, and running away from the troubles you created will just sign your death warrant. And you better not be surprised by the developments brought about by the people you systematically exploit, you like competition? Start producing! Unless you want people in caves like me to get you out of your mess, but such people can be kind of wild with "civilized" and "modern" people, but maybe they are the ones that are truly civilized versus life...

The value of money is supposed to mean you're doing something valuable to reality, you're doing good, but to say you're a good person, or that you are doing something good, you must have a fundamental principle to judge people's value toward good or evil, but the pseudo capitalism market system sure is devoid of such a vision, while we're living overloaded with prisons, to punish all those criminals who don't follow the law. So you can sing that good and evil doesn't exist, but as soon as you make a law or punish someone you are in fact deciding what is good and evil, it's just that this in an evil reality the monetary (life energy) system is fundamentally evil in itself, so either evil doesn't exist, or it is as disconnected from money, even if it is totally connected, or you twist good and evil in the mind of people for acceptance, tolerance, adaptation, peace...everything is still a matter of good and evil whatever the hypocrisy. Good exist, bad exist, and doing bad things is evil.

What sure doesn't help is making ego attitudes top valuable, just because these are better for exploiting life's energy. Manipulation, unfairness, superiority, profiting, top valuable and associated to godhood, isn't it nice. The problem is that your ego is not valuable; your work toward attaining positive goals is valuable, the good you do is valuable, the evil you do is not valuable, and each weight on their own side of the balance of your value toward life advancement, and you can guess that at some point monetary unfairness can have a negative effect on masses of people.

And since money is associated to good and evil one way or the other, you are stuck seeing it systemized toward attaining positive to humanity and life goals as a priority. So you're definitively wrong if you mainly see money as just having a positive legal job, or a market competition thing, particularly if it ends-up encouraging unfair attitudes, worse if it's at a global scale, like country competition and democracy-capitalism. And we should never ignore the negative effect any systematization of money has on other civilization facets. An ideal monetary system must be based on the value people can have on as many facets of their life energy expenditures toward reality or civilization or life. And what is seen as negative is not beer or a thing humans made; it is an attitudes thing 100%. It may seem hard to do but it is not so in basic philosophy if you got the reality that can develop from it; you need a logical philosophy about life, love, gods, ego, principles, and you need good and strong willing people that will develop it.

The basic line to follow, the ideal that is a guaranteed good view is to value people proportional to what they provide as life advancement, which can take many forms, even entertainment, but one thing's for sure; if you don't care about life, which includes yourself, you'll fail as a species, disappear action reaction, so why should you be worthy? So maybe you're better give people who care for it better value, not rubber entertainment. So now you got it, fundamental global good is how valuable you are toward life's advancement (most importantly humanity) and fundamental global evil is how counter-productive you are at it, and finally, you must add fairness and truth to this, which you can as much see as unconscious harmony as a facet of life advancement. With that, you can develop a good vision of money distribution, to better encourage some attitudes, jobs too, to work toward precise noble goals, or ideals. A spirituality of life can help while trying to understand it better, through science, and with principles truth, judgment, logic etc, you can have a good idea of what is important as a weight of good or evil, because you can pay people for their good or evil effects too, if you are not scared of these words, if you understand that the balance never stops moving; it's a momentum balance you go toward more evil or you go toward more good.

When people are born, they take all kind of paths that never stop cumulating to both good and evil, you act and you get the balance moving, and the weight adds momentum to the person in good or in evil, and the more you cumulate as you live, the more irreversible the momentum gets, and that applies to a whole civilization. Supposing we're pinned to the floor in evil, a lot from a systematization of unfairness, then if we want to reverse the momentum we'll have to blast lots of evil off the balance or supply loads of good on the other side. In the end, you waste nothing doing good, but you can waste everything doing evil, a lot in violence, blood and displaced "peace and love" frustrations, whatever the temporary exploited boost.

Now, this is still a vague view, you don't get out of your house gun blazing at your neighbor shouting "You evil shit!" maybe "bad shit" is better, but you understand that everything is relative. It's like ego-gods, those don't exist on earth for sure, attaining godhood is a human perversion because humans don't "evolve" to humanhood, neither do gods evolve to godhood, a human evolving to godhood is a twisted association, and you can bet gods shouldn't be happy about all such associations profiting people condemned humanity to.

One thing's for sure, a skill or admiration on hype are not the best basis on which to decide who is worth more, particularly when you can use money to create hype for popularity... Furthermore, I say there is a limit to both end of the spectrum; the poor to the bone is not supposed to exist when possible, neither the royally rich in a limited situation (that's an ideal).

Money is truly power, you can see it as the power to pay people to get something done, but that's the facet those in the competition want you to see, the true fundamental vision is the life energy (power, time) people put to a task, and one of the many problem with it is that it is not fairly divided and forwarded to the most worthy people. Money, like for anything we'll ever invent, is not evil (that feels so much like talking to children, it really makes me feel hopeless when I know I really have to explain these things to adults, like for computers and guns and games, all not evil, it's just that some people will never want to understand that the problem is the reality they spend their life energy encouraging, mainly, the frustrated people it produces and its adaptation mechanism, and so their solution is the elimination of guns, computers, violent movies, games, testosterone, fists, drugs, like doing this will make everybody super nice, ready for alien enslavement...There are a lot of adults who see money as evil, they want no money nowhere because this reality made it too unfair, and no amount of argument will make them understand that money is as important as love, I mean the invention, both need civilized people (not slaves to PMBBD) to take their best form. So like for love, many will refute the truth or importance of it because it has been a problem in their life. So money is not evil, for all those people, particularly the occupy wall street gang and the Venus project gang (both came together, both made no sense, and probably both were influenced by governments to demonize money which will guarantee the failure of both visions (we'll need to wait for the venus project to become a zoo to finally say no other system can beat the democracy-capitalism business, see, we tried what the biggest quantity of people wanted as an alternative, and it ended-up as scientific experiment dependent from the ego reality!) The other effect, evidently, is that tons of feeble minds seeking a way to feel superior got indoctrinated to anarchy and the no money "philosophy", and the time, effort and emotive investment they put to show off condemned them to sectary attitudes. As for the government, it got what he wanted, a sect of anarchists and a sect of venus people, both interchangeable, and the brain of the small angry protest is wasted in bullshit, the energy of frustration dissipated around this generation, nothing left for a new vision that makes sense, only hostility, division, misunderstanding, evil won another 50 years...the last one before the decisive one...Want to win the next one? Declare war to bullshit in the blood! That way when an anarchist debark and start bossing around with his vision where bosses don't exist, you can take a baseball bat and shut him up good! The same for Venus people bumming your money while singing they'll remake the world without money. In a war against bullshit, the sources of it get hit or we lose, but always size proportional; we must never forget that about evil, you need small evil, I will not live in a reality where people don't tease the devil, but too much evil and you create hell. So, as you probably know, my general philosophy is that a small bullshit between friends is nothing, I do it all the time (I did...), but it's different when you're on a quest of bullshitting the whole world...

Money is just a mathematical way to give value to people's life energy time, if you create or gather something, then you spent time and energy for it, but it took so much time that you couldn't grow food, so you go meet someone that spent his energy growing food and you want to exchange your invention for food. At this point it is bartering, the problem is that the guy only got potatoes and you are allergic to potatoes, or you like these but there are no potatoes in his current inventory, so the guy will give you something in exchange for your stuff that represent the value of your work (time), in old times it was gold, but it is just a representation of a value which can take any form, a mathematical number is allright, but in old times they didn't have secure computerized systems to keep track of the numbers so gold (physical money) did that job. Now with gold in your pockets, you can go to another seller in another village that didn't want your invention but that got potatoes in his inventory. So you see, where is the evil in that? In fact, we'd be stuck at tribe level without it. The problem is how people manipulate the numbers, or the value of their work in competition, the problem is the principles or laws controlling money flow, and today these are all wrong because we admire the best manipulators and the best profiteers get everything. Understanding the necessity of money is a step you'll have to take to separate yourself from the illuminated and enter the camp of the realist, the war is not against money, your war is against those who manipulated to get too much of it.

So saying that living without money would be counter evolutionary is quite an understatement, it would make humanity regress in all kind of ways, back to tribe level. But I won't explain beyond that, I learned long ago that arguing, even with logical arguments, with those who invested too much in their belief, which can be as much emotionally as materially, is a waste of time. But that seems particularly true for those who see no money as the future of humanity, or who confound the way money moves with money itself, it's like a cult thing. And from my experience, that sure does apply to the many indoctrinated and closed minded who are part of the Venus project and are plaguing the internet in their quest to bring the good news to everybody, it does not even work to infantilize them with the most basic vision of the use of money, they're in automated hostile denial as soon as they hear the evil word "money", their guru forbids it. I know some will want to prove they are open minded, they will want to discuss the matter, but they will ignore any sensible argument, you are wrong before you say something, while they only emphasize after effects of a bad systematization to prove money is evil. They will even reject human and life nature and ignore gaping flaws in their own argumentation. Finally, they are not interested in other alternatives even if they say they are, they have found their place and invested their mind, their choice is made, their vision is the final truth.

They fail in the common sense part of the brain, but I understand this reality need places where superficial people can feel smarter planet, where they can have a greater humanitarian cause to defend, but they are taking the means to end-up no better than sects is what I say, even if they adapt their vision to better fit this reality. For now it is worthless trying to explain the why they will fail, the more you try, the stronger their resolve... My work? I sent it to venus people in 2011 and nothing. I guess they need videos, they believe in videos, very rare are those who will read a book about a competing view. How many pages does it take to explain a whole new system? A lot, and someone with the patience to read 200 pages about a new system is a rare thing these days, particularly for people who have a lot of spreading "the good news" to do... I did try repeatedly to get venus people to read my work, I tell them "I know of a book that is reinventing reality, there is a city in it too" they all answer "show me the book, I'll read it!" But they are all liars, I never hear from them again, they simply don't read it, they need a short video of top quality or a pamphlet full of colorful image and catch phrases...But I'm exaggerating a little, they need pseudo intello bullshit memes too...probably because there is less text than in the videos, or it fires a new neuron that the bearer will immediately notice, and the ensuing feeling of intelligence is so precious that it will be associated to reciprocal understanding, a "wink" "wink" to the meme author, leading to an assumption of truth all the way to virulent defense and frustration, all within a few seconds. Just like humor, but the laughing is in the head...

I sent a copy to scientology and one to the Vatican too, but nothing, nobody interested. But I understand it's not easy to describe a whole system in all its complexities, without pot holes everywhere, to read it someone need humility, patience, imagination to visualize things, and intelligence to understand. If you think you got these qualities, then I'm proud my work is in your hands, you will know how to appreciate it, but still, fake bullshit people are everywhere, so read well before criticizing my work because I'll be more than happy to prove you didn't read it well by pointing at a paragraph to answer your criticism. That doesn't apply to a social, love or party situation, evidently, but social and party is out because of phones that forces me to the "no mistake permitted" scenario...

As I'm updating my work, I'll add that it seems I may have been wrong about these institutions not reading my work, I think Christianity has gone completely nuts, they almost caused my death, and I wouldn't be surprised to see a piece of manipulation coming from them based on my work. Scientology I don't know, but I've noticed that the venus project city has totally changed like they are copying some aspects of my work. I published my city design in 2011, the new design for the venus project city has been made in 2014, and presently they are reaping in the trophies in city design, while it looks like my own work will be erased from history because the pub and money all go to the Venus project. I didn't send my work to them as a pile of funky ideas, I mentioned that anybody could use my work if it was not to profit from it, or used to help this reality, and if the source was mentioned. None of these conditions has been fulfilled by neither Christianity nor the venus project. I worked to invent my spirituality, for free, I worked to design my city, for free, I worked to invent my A&D system, for free, I don't copy, I invent, and all my work is sacred because I didn't profit from it, so if some profiteers cheat me while knowing the condition of the contract, stole my ideas even if it is to modify them to fit their vision, then they are automatically signing a contract they'll regret far beyond their living experience. And you can be the pope all you want or the prime minister of Canada, you are a human like me down here and you'll respect me!

My views of the mind, life, love and the universe are based on fundamental principles I invented too, read their particular chapters; you don't go anywhere far without fundamental principles, and that's what is most missing to this "social" world, people talk and talk and tweet and facebook and all, grow a big fucking brain full of communication, spill philosophy bouts taken around everywhere, think they are profound, but they are still incredibly limited in fundamental principles; they see those as stupid laws taken on T.V. or in a movie with which they defend their attitudes or actions. The level of profundity you can go philosophically is dictated by your imagination, willpower and, most important, the level of conflicting complexity you are under. So you can't drive your life as an adequate reflection of your superficial aspirations if there is too much conflicting stuff in your philosophy, particularly fundamentals, and that is as much an unconscious effect as a conscious one; if you've been thought (or historically encouraged, pressure selection) a way of things or adequate attitudes, and then develop a different philosophy as you grow older, then you new philosophy will be inefficient as long as you don't consciously eliminate conflicting stuff (better explanation in the "The Seat Of My Mind" chapter (book)). That's why you can't truly exchange on fundamentals with today's people, there is a big barrier of understanding that is almost impossible to go over because if you go down to fundamentals you end-up where the conflict are, and 90% of the reactions you get from conflict are not constructive; thus philosophy can become LSD fun you forget after a few days, or setting the base of the fundamentals will get you a mental or personal problem tag, some will even send you to the psy, there will be so much denial you'll have a hard time differentiating it, those who feel they won't like where the discussion is heading will leave to skip wasting time fumbling their invincible preconceptions, some won't even want to try understanding your view because they are scared of true change, or judgment, or they'll feel attacked, or they invested too much time and energy making their mental construction or materialist accumulations.

All in all, it's hard to get a constructive tangent if you are dealing with the fundamentals of today's world, particularly if your philosophy or spirituality or mentality is original, since these subjects are supposed to have been exhausted long ago, in the modern schema of thinking of the current selection, imagine when you are original on all 3 aspects... Maybe humanity has taken its final form; if most people react in denial when faced with the truth of fundamentals, like what is money, then trying to resolve fundamental conflict is almost useless, and this is one more problem for my work. Today's people know too much to be proven wrong, and everything is a matter of winning something in the competition of everything, so whatever my arguments and explications make total logical sense or not, they'll be battled or ignored, even laughed at, even if my work may be the only one complete enough in all aspects to be used as the fundamental pillar of a new reality. I would guess it most likely that manipulators and profiteers, those with the means, will prefer to use my ideas to reinforce this reality.

I understand that different epochs reflect different attitudes in people, but we are presently at the most important moment of our history, so we should not have a passive attitude versus anything that has the potential to work toward the biggest problems of our epoch. Don't think there won't be resentment when there will be no more hope except god, particularly if people decide they've been preserved from good possibilities; future people won't have our present responsibilities, even if their life will probably be harder; don't think responsibility disappear in the wind with time, not taking them always bear a cost in the future, until they contribute to form the reality. So all the stuff we like presently, what we are standing for, what is most important in our life, our priorities, all that will end-up under scrutiny, proportional to a bunch of factors, and maybe manipulation ability won't be the main one, so instead of pride, humanity could reap the most massive depression instead, if not bloody suicidal war. Don't think we can only be loved for our current choices, we could end-up hated like nobody in history, and you wouldn't want empathy to reward humanity with shame in face of the loss of potential.

I know it's easy to discard my work as bad, it could the last thing this reality will fear after all, but we should still take people like me seriously, unless you want to be seen as a bunch of irresponsible people lacking judgment when there won't be historians to cry over civilization failure; people will know for a long time we passed hundred years feeling and knowing we were on the wrong track, and we didn't do anything to change fundamentals (the track), media people particularly, we only reduced pollution to survive longer. On what argument do you base your judgment that my work is bad? We'll see if you were right to ignore it in the end, it may even happen a lot sooner than your worst fear, all of you "gods" who manipulate this or that aspect of living in your final understanding, will you understand that you're human like everybody or will you wait for people to fight with my work in hands? Another reality for a different view is not possible? You prefer to put all the energy of humanity in the same basket, all that while you pressure generation after generation for adaptation and acceptance, until humanity is inadequate for the new environment that arose from your selective blindness. What you don't know doesn't hurt you anyways, selective consciousness to skip depression, as a proof of your mental health...

It is the time, now, to make a new reality, people can spend 100 million to develop a game, but they can't make a simulation of a new way of running things, or a different economic system? Your choice, I'm just a guy with different priorities, and it is sure not me that can do something about it, so let's go, strive forward, until you're in the face of too late with only the most fundamental clash as a justification to persevere, a battle of ego people versus a mess of competitive new age hippies without a fundamentally different way for a better world, because without a global vision of a new reality with different fundamentals all "let's change" gangs would do no better if they had vast territories; they would probably become a bunch of farmers. Communities I mean, we'd go back in full "love" swing of the 60 with sex gurus and pot everywhere, but you don't go to space with communities or while smoking pot...You need a decision system that can accomplish anything possible (not compete possibilities), that that keeps truth integrity while requiring easy input from everybody concerned by a subject proportional to age, for adequate judgment and priorities (instead of making PMBBD for whatever reason), and you need a reward (monetary) system that is fair and based on the truth of money. You need such a system experimented by people or by a simulation, as an independent reality, and then you need people to massively want it; something like 5-10% people asking for an alternative is big in the current mental state. Just don't forget the means are in the pockets of a very few, including the violence machine and the propaganda machine, the problem is there, you need the means, you need a project making sense that won't end-up as a sect or a zoo under the control of ego reality, a visual video, a simulation preferably. If enough people with the means, whatever the form, involve themselves, then things can be done peacefully. The "working class" will keep on working and the system will just adjust itself to different job parameters, but without a deciding system and a vision of money that makes fundamental sense nothing will work to bring you in space; people will just waste their time and frustration in illuminated ideals, practicing the immunology system of the ego reality, making it stronger, more of a condemnation. I will designed such an alternative, but I aint got the capacities to make a beautiful video, or a simulation. Anyway, if I was to make everything myself then I wouldn't need people, no? If people don't involve themselves any better than superficially, then it shows they only care to boast how intelligent they think they are. If you want a different world, if you're proud of this body under your control, even if you don't have it the way you want it in your ideal, if life is extraordinary to you, then you'll have to stop spending your energy for your ego gods and their competitions and sweat for it, prove it, fight for it, I do, whatever people often piss me off, I like people more than anybody will want to believe, because I comprehend, even if the form I have chosen will remove me from human contacts, I don't have time for this, maybe later, but then love will be my priority. One thing's for sure, I won't accept the failure of solar life, so there are people who are "born" to suffer my most punishing opinions, even if I could have grown like them. Still in the end, I must not be alone to want a different reality, I'm human and I'm nothing without other people, what would I do alone in paradise? Even my present life is unbearable from loneliness, even if I know it's the price I had to pay to take my responsibility. Life need your help, I need your help, I refuse to be alone, even if I could remake the world with the snap of a finger, I wouldn't do it without a whole fucking people, I need proofs that people are really interested in a different way, not only with their mouth.

For now, there's nothing with a really different system except what's necessary to form basic communities, so people would go back to ego fundamentals quick enough if they wanted a serious space industry. If I wanted to be bad I'd say that the "best" philosophies that are "hot" (publicized) today (in a self-qualified urban and modern equalitarian democratic society where gender difference is becoming thin) are old stuff based on the same fundamentals; like socialism, or religious hybridizations like yoga inducted Buddhism, or sectarian rose bananism stuff involved with anarchy, since they are very fond of twisting the definition of things to gain more adepts, like twisting altruism to become confounded with non-ego, or twisting individualism to become confounded with ego, and people like me end-up tagged as the ego ones, while conformity gets better served. Some even go to the extent of defending ridiculous notions like everybody is equal, or worse for the people from Venus who defend the notion that there is no need for an economic (reward) system! And to think this is the most popular vision of the future, we're lucky most visions don't become reality... To top it all, let's go anarchic, let's twist the definition of anarchy to end-up in a far worse dictatorship situation (I wrote about anarchy previously, and I came to the conclusion that anarchy is anarchy like everybody understands it, not something else, particularly a tool to attack leadership. I'm too intelligent I think...) All these contortion increases conflict in the mind.

So for me time (or human life) is money, and since I should have the right to at least control and possess my own life, then I'll always battle any system that is meant to control and possess my life (time, money) without my input. The only principle I accept as valid to have a slab (depending on priorities) of my time, money, life's control or possession lended to someone else, is from fairness and logical principles reflected as valid in reality. I will always try to limit what a bad reality and its innocent people take from me, call it egotism if you want, but I'm at war, and I don't give to my enemies, only to survive.

Understanding these fundamental truth of money they sure don't seems teach in universities in this reality, the only thing we should tax is human life energy, the object or the service is the result of this human life energy expenditure, so you should not tax the result, only the origin; the human that spent energy making or collecting or helping. You cannot tax a robot, you cannot tax an objects, an animal or food or technology or medicine or whatever. You can only tax the high consciousness life energy worth; the spending of human energy to have these things, the object or service cannot be a transfer of that energy without falling in a competition of who profit the most. Once the person is taxed, you have no right to tax the result, and people buying the result are spending their life energy value (money) to pay the salary to the taxed person; why would they pay a tax on that since the money they have is already taxed? To profit someone that has no place there is the only answer. You can separate the value of something to a thousand factors, something we are already doing, logically, so either you see all of those factors as a tax or you stop it and separate the money where it is needed, since the system already taxed the source. (As an example, why would you tax gas? Taxes the industry and use the money where you wants, and the industry in turn sells gas more expensively, no need to tax gas).

I understand that limiting tax like that in this reality would not work with the way of things since everything is interdependently made to work in harmony with the philosophy, and money dealings have been made so complex that it's hard to know what is part of a salary and what is not. So this reality can hardly do otherwise than seeing a tax as an added factor on a pile of complexity, so while it sings capitalism and the (emotive) market, it just take a tax anywhere it see fit, with some principles that seems to make sense but not, like saying that they tax bad food because they're good "gods" who care for their population, so let's tax bad food! Hydro fat is evidently evil fat, widespread knowledge, candy is luxury, and luxury is evil, widespread knowledge, so let's tax these things, but white bread is gooood, so no tax. But they sure wouldn't dare to remove taxes from all the basic needs of people, like toilets for normal people not taxed while luxury toilets comes with a boiler full of taxes...Or basic phone and internet not taxed, electricity too, etc, etc. So you see it doesn't make sense, if we were in a good consistent monetary system, the tax money would be taken at the source, not in consumer pockets, you tax any business proportionally to the use they make of hydro fat, you tax any business that produces luxury food or items, and if the business can't make a profit, then it either shouldn't exist or your tax is too high.

As for revenue tax, in a situation where the monetary system is centralized straight, good and fair, where the reality is the sole stash, there is far less complexity, and you can stick to a variable tax on different jobs since no massive stashing is possible, the job is just worth it or not, and the tax is either fully expressed in the case of a business dependent from profits, or even eliminated altogether in the case of a salary gotten from the reality (system), the salary just gets bigger or smaller and to hell with the tax.

Next, presently not only knowledge is not free, but education is seen as an investment. A civilization should have the means to make the gaining of knowledge free, since the ability to make it available should raise proportionally with the ease or means gained from it. Knowledge, with some very rare exception, should be totally available free, and the same for education as long as people have a good attitude with it, which can take the form of not redundantly failing courses. We should not limit or stop people from gaining education, be it with a fine or indebting. Who are you indebted to? The market? Businesses? The government? No, it is because people are educated if the governmental system works. Yes it will always have a cost, but it's part of developing humanity under its best form, and it's a matter of fairness too, so is a matter of good and evil. Again, there can be exceptions to this, specific learning strategies or emphasizes wanted by parents or businesses, which can have to be paid for, but this has no commune measure with how education is provided presently where people are indebting from gaining an education, as a pressure, or even to force them to the system. Worse, for many schools education is a business with people profiting from it to live in senseless richness and luxury, but businessmen, whatever the way you call them, are not the most visible, it's a wonder there is not a parallel dimension where they disappear to... And like that's not twisted enough, the student will borrow money to pay their salaries while the cost of what they provide is insignificant, particularly with the internet; students indebt themselves to grow evil, hurray! Then they got to work and embark in the system in competition to reimburse their legally stolen money they had no choice to pay, with interests to banks evidently, why not? Graciously provided by governments, as a too big fraction of the budget, for an added dose of bad feelings. All that at an age where they have a world of things to explore, all kind of things to try, fun too. So you can bet most young people aren't motivated to study the reality they live in seriously, all the complexities of it, while they have all kind of serious education tests to pass. This is why another philosophy to have when considering that people pass half their life growing, is to make the understanding of the reality they live in as simple as possible, surely not so complex they need a degree in economics and politics to understand in whose hands and for what their student money disappeared, and learn to totally not understand the basics of it or a good system. Just so they can be well brainwashed and have a tie and act big when talking about it to inferiors. For now education past childhood is a business, an investment, and some profiteers will evidently see it as a direct source of money, an option when governments lack money, because, you know, they never have enough, whatever all our history of cumulating creation...More austerity is necessary, because things are always getting better, and education is an option... so let's cut in the size of the education budget, or let's add a tax on this facet of education or that, take money from students who pay with a debt to banks, with interests as profits and as pressure. Lucky some can get a grant... The same for schools, many schools wouldn't be much if they didn't get grants, often from their successful students, while governments try to be as cheap as possible to save money, something weird like that.

A debt is a logical principle that makes sense as most people understands it. Normal people when they contract a debt are forced by the government (system) to reimburse it, most of the time, unless they end-up in bankruptcy, which doesn't bode well for one's future. But this doesn't applies proportionally to the amount of means people take, that is, when those rich pay their taxes in full...At the extreme, small countries must pay their debt unless big countries take control of some facets of their economy, while big countries don't care growing their debt like crazy because they fear nobody. Then they make movies where the super hero is there to help the weaker people, but it's funny that he always end-up serving the agenda of governments. The truth of the system is that the lower you are on the pyramid, the more your attitude is good, even if small crimes are involved, which shouldn't happen as much if things were fair, but after a history of pressure selection I guess the mentality evolved to become a reflection of ego competition.

This monetary system cannot be fair because it is based on competition between unequal in resources and size countries separated from racism and mass killings. Not only that, but if you add all the evident debt of every country and you will get a monstrous, mind blowing and always growing number, which humanity will never be able to pay, even if we work to the end of time exponentially past 24/24h to reimburse. It's like the debt system is so sick it is where everything wrong of the world ends-up expressed as some sort of inflation, it's like every country is embarked in a competition of growing its debt without ever reimbursing it, a gigantic wheel of credit and cheaters where you can pay one card by borrowing on the other, and every country got a hundred such cards. I'm exaggerating the vision a bit, but I could say the current debt of the world represent the size of Lucifer! So to whom are we going to reimburse this? The ego god? Yes, the system, as an eternal condemnation; whatever it crumble, you are indebted to build it all over again, all of you people not born! We are condemned to live in this reality forever, because to keep this debt you have to keep a pyramid of unevenly separated by war countries forever, a competition of exploitation, to be the top country, the top 20, the top 8 and so on, and the goal is to win by becoming the one to whom people own the most, creating an eternal wheel where one unfairly got the most means, he decide things, the ways to exploit things and people. He will always be the first as he got everything to be, the first to make discoveries, the first to arrange things to make more money.

My point is that this vision of debt is based on indebting the planet and humanity to an unfair competition, it is based on transforming resources and market potential to make the system work, and while the whole planet of resources and people is condemned to the system, failure to satisfy the standard of the competition justifies more powerful countries to put pressure and even take control of economic facets, whatever the way it is done, to get back its due. Evidently, it is just a right, or a way to put pressure, or to force reimbursement, and at the limit there's always default, if not then you'd end-up with a single government, but doing that would fail the whole system and the reason for the existence of the country competition. The goal is not to take over the world, the goal is to decide the world while not destroying everything. Still, you can't eliminate the world debt, even if some countries have the means to keep it neutral, and if you know the world debt is always increasing, far from going back to 0 without cheating, then what does that means? It means you know it is a problem, there will always be this debt and you'll always need tons of innocents to pay for it. Worse than that, we get more indebted while the population grows, while logic should result in the contrary. We have this effect while in logic the more associated we are the more comfortable we should get, while owing nothing to nobody. That just don't work man, because if half the people died from an explosion tomorrow what would happen? You'd get more indebted too! That would automatically minimally multiply by 2, probably far more in total influences, the debt on the remaining people, and they'd have to reimburse it, because money is still always the energy of people spent at jobs. So you'd have rebuild destroyed stuff while still enriching controlling gangs and provide tons of entertainment and pretty girls, every newborn will have a million dollar debt to reimburse to "gods", they better work hard and make tons of babies, and while working hard building they'll add to their debt! Even if I'm exaggerating a little and the situation ends-up different, who will systemize things eternal anew and select people in a cataclysmic situation if we don't stop them? People who went through it without a scar, the rich and their family, and they'll need you, you'll have to build their new empire, even if they too, will work hard giving orders and systemizing ego anew, and they'll even provide you with guns if their armies and bombs have been expended to keep their order, since they'll profit from the opportunity to adjust their territories or conquer anybody that gave them troubles when things were at "peace", or eliminate those who refuse to develop the mentality to become a source of profits, except Tarzan people evidently, small tribes running wild and eating roots are a nice sight, unless they plant themselves on a source of profits. In the end, the most ego people are supposed to become "gods" who write a few lines, open their mouth for a song or a speech, show some fashion, guarantee richness to their friends and family, travel around the world at a fantastic cost doing socialization with the like of themselves, and secret dark sider things that produces lots of pollution or degenerate life. So they wouldn't miss such an opportunity to have it once and for all. All this is stupid and doesn't make sense? I'm exaggerating, as always, yet, aren't we doing exactly that presently? And for people it makes perfect sense! Even if for me that is inverted it is ridiculously strange and scary.

And isn't it evil not to pay your debts? And what is more evil than forcing a debt on people that owe you nothing, like babies? A good reality will make it so that a debt will only be an individual thing or a lifetime limited help, a debt is something personal and associated to responsibility, the responsibility to pay must be on the precise person who create the debt, at the limit it can be on those who accepted it, so yes a population can contract a debt, but first they must decide it as a population, and second they'll have to reimburse it within a realist slab of time, at the limit you could say that those living contracted it and when they die the remaining amount must be separated by those still living, and the last option is for the population to "vote" an extension. You cannot transfer a debt to a different mind than the one that contracted it, if you want to do that then you must get the judgment of everybody concerned and affected to decide if the person or people got its debt erased. At a civilization scale you can have a buffer amount for it decided by the mass and reimbursed every year, anyway, you can do anything as long as you don't condemn innocents who may hate what you did with the money to pay. And guessing the future got nothing to do with this, you'd need the opinion of those future people but they are not born yet.

But we're so sure of our final truth of a best system that we indebted the whole future of humanity to the point of pressure selecting it to ignore or accept these things, or limit their vision to a competition of who takes the most to spend it on their priorities which are a reflection of PMBBD. Whatever the efforts made to make a population to fit in a mentality, it will always stay unfair to be born condemned, and that automatically, right from the beginning, at the most fundamental level make of this whole reality an unfair one, even if you say the debt is nothing and someday everybody will default and do the bailout thing while laughing at the worthless PIB, because, you know, the bottom is the limit! Or is it the goal?

One way or the other a debt is supposed to be reimbursed, not forever increase, and the notion is a fact in our mind, a truth we'll never destroy, and so this is another highly conflicting unconscious mind inconsistency that will limit or evolution for as long as it's not settled, there's lot of that concerning money in this reality, limiting the evolution of humanity. What you call a debt, whatever the form, will have to be reimbursed one way or the other; no funky inconsistent infinite competition debt. Now, I understand that there are many facets to civilization, and one culture may need to borrow from another culture on a few facets, with reimbursement contracts of all kind, but the problem in this reality is that the world debt is forever increasing at a rate that has no commune measure with inflation, and it means the economic system is wrong altogether.

You got to pay your debt man, it's not a fun joke, it is a mind limitation thing, a truth versus falsehood, good versus evil, human development path, it is the cost of unfairness (the end result of having unfairly rich people), and it is an enslavement to this system. The general population must visually know that a debt is reimbursed, even if it is only one debt concerning a facet of society, that way they can say "yes we attained our goal!" We must not say "Yes! we have found a new stash of maple syrup 20 kilometers under the earth, our kids will get at it, let's grow the debt hurray!" We based our debt system on materialism instead of life, competition instead of association, where the biggest piece of land with the most materialistic resources end-up winning the economic competition as long as it got enough workforce, gotten from multiculturalism homogenization if need be, as long as they get a fucking job or die, black markets the ultimate enemy...In the end, when there will be no more resources, your only option to stay independent economically will be to provide exotic food and entertainment and nice places to see for god, but your temporary colorful human biodiversity you sing everywhere as a proof of non-racism will have become boring homogeneity by then, all will be left to you will be insanities...But insanity and doing stupid can be emphasized anytime by media people, so I guess we'll need to bioengineer freaks to keep the entertainment and "like" machine going...Having all aspects of the debt system potentially reimbursed within the lifetime of the people contracting it will free the babies! The mind I mean too, future people will be less condemned and we will be good for it, babies won't actually run free everywhere in the woods.

The worst is that a vast slab of people are unfairly poor, we're not even indebting to make it fair for those people, only for hyped entertainment and gods. Worse, we'll manipulate words and statistics to minimize it so people don't much care, like suicide versus assassination, they'll confound extreme poverty with poverty; to the rich poverty is people living in streets, maybe 5%-10% of the population, normal, it's not like we're living in India or something...Even then it's an incredible challenge to feed them with something else than leftovers, we must make pub campaigns after pub campaigns for philanthropy... Worse, a lot of people indebt themselves only to be comfortable, like a lot of students, still worse, a lot of people indebt themselves to just survive in hell! And all these insanities concerning money piss off tons of minds unconsciously, as I already explained in a previous chapter, and the effect is that tons of people refuse to care about many things and end-up naturally taking counterproductive attitudes toward life's advancement, as another aspect of the pressure selection. I guess that a hellish reality is competent at producing evil people, it's just that at the point where it is today people have developed genetic traits that better fit this reality, so yes, people are getting born evil more and more, even if they start as happy little ego ideology babies, it's a question of destiny...

But who is responsible? Except nobody? That's hard to pinpoint accurately, I'd say the basics was there as soon as the market (capitalism) became a genius idea, then a history of economic decision from people who feared losing their standard of living adjusted things as a logical continuation of choices provided by well educated economists just doing their job. You can twist everything to end up displacing responsibility on others, but the responsible is always the most unfair one, proportional to whatever form of means, you can't twist things to say someone civilized that is worth a comfortable standard of living is responsible for troubles if there are unfairly rich around taking all the means, if he's worth a comfortable standard of living then he has the right to have it and not feel bad for if even if he takes it with a credit card, if you're a civilized civilization that is...

There are a few factors that should ease the life of people as time advances, the main ones are better technology, automation and historical construction of reality. But this seems to have no effect on people's general amelioration of their standard of living. Evidently, some factors do have an effect by the intrinsic of their development, like making better building will make it so people live in a better environment, and who wants an ugly city? Then you got to take into consideration that an evil species in the universe still needs technology, and a system to develop entertainment for its gods, and zoos, and communication, everything, a lot as facades to embark good people, even universities for the blind, everybody must be embarked as a superficial proof that it's the best system, which in fact is a reflection of fear that it is not, and the proof of that is that while everything must become a competition, a new system is not permitted as a competitor, it is an enemy automatically, even if it wouldn't make sense, like most competition is just a tool to develop evil.

You can try to make me believe I should owe money to pay for the work of my ancestors who were exploited and profited from, saying I'm profiting from their work, but those people are dead so I owe nothing to nobody and nobody is supposed to possess the work or imagination of my ancestors and sell or rent it to me. People are supposed to get a better standard of living for spending history building society, so it is normal that they request more as time advances, which, you guessed it, won't happen in this reality, for a multitude of reasons. In the end, don't you ever be born in hell human, you'll be condemned to compete unbelievably rich people as you find your place on their pyramids, or you'll be a nothing with barely the right to survive, whatever you got a history of ancestors believers that did stuff through history.

So, while we prepare the debt report for those who will leave to colonize another planet, with exponential interests evidently, while not forgetting inflation as a add on, I'm pondering what will happen when everybody will want to have an impossible to reimburse debt like the US? Why should the US have that right and not others? Oh, it's mostly based on potential resources and production, it's a matter of country competition, so no problem, the one that took the most unfair means (god) will most likely to go plant thrusters on a piece of iron somewhere out there, and crash it in Alaska, and hurrah fair country competition...just be careful not to crash it on Yellowstone...Strange there is no villain movie about that, with a super hero to save thing at h-0.00...

Some will say you just have to sell the US at the worst, but wouldn't that be ridiculous? I bet you'd prefer war, and let's say you took the means to have aan overwhelming war machine, no? Others will say we just have to print money, or that banks are good makers of money and that everybody else borrows it, but that's a manipulation lie, the money bankers get, they get it from investing the money people leave in their account, and printing more money freely is just an ultimate way to make numbers fit, for governments to have more to spend, and this printing of money thing is so ridiculous, so insane, that it will eventually lead to the total failure of the whole fucking world! Maybe not, they'll make the economic crisis thing so everybody work harder for less, or go prostitute, or die in the pressure selection, can't miss such an opportunity, let's kick a few bankers out too, always need a rich now and then to take the hit for the rest, before inventing another insanity to keep thing going, since this economic system can be manipulated in whatever way to forever keep the planetary and human life energy exploitation business running. Printing more money leads to increases inflation which is already problematic by the idiosyncrasies of supply and demand in "capitalism". A variable inflation is understandable when talking price variations of products and services, but it is not supposed to increase exponentially. The culprit of this insane inflation is the economic system that is disconnected from life, it's just a scheme to enrich some unfairly, even if the fundamental principles will forever be there. And so the current view of money is evil because the way it was transformed conflict with the basic principles of money. In fact money is all a good and evil matter, and far more than you'll ever want to believe; when we'll meet an alien civilization and compare our economies, we'll see that to take its best form a high consciousness species has to relate its whole money flow in harmony with principles of good and evil.

So here we go inflation, where this thing you bought for 100$ in 1950 will cost 5000$ 100 years later, and tending toward infinity before the end of the century, supposing we get quantum supercomputers to deal with the numbers, as we prepare the future of our children...The trick? Stop printing money, stop defaulting countries, and take the money where it is instead of fucking everything up! Instead of printing money for governments need, just take it where it is! But that would be counter ego reality evolutionary, stopping manipulators and profiteers enriching themselves...Where is the money? While a country is sweating in austerity it contains a thousand little smiling Gadafies and their family dynasties dressing pretty and having a marriage, a lot are politicians, and that's just for the smallest countries, so what's wrong here? Nothing they'll prove, everything is as it should be.

You are forced to waste much mind potential to survive comfortably, not bears and lions, but the human reality; you have to adapt to its ways for survival in it, then grow what you can good from that. And when your consciousness wants to express itself, you know where to look, get in a protest group, there are many, recycle, no problem, you can do what you want, but don't say the system or reality have a problem or you'll end-up in front of a psy, you're part of it, and whatever you do there is always someone climbing the steps to replace a rich, and it take a damn lot of "normal" people to have the negative effect of a single rich that always find ways with "their" means to profit from any situation, even one that they created themselves; they got the means...

And so you start in life with a pressure to work for the system, like you owe something to god, but nobody to point for the debt, only the direction pointed by god. Anyway, building a whole civilization from a pressure selection because not only you're sure you got the best system of the universe but because you're so sure everybody should be happy that you seek the destruction of those who think differently, is a ridiculous notion for me; if no government ever saw it as a problem, then it means they are all popes and they don't know where they are, they are a result of the system, a product. But I could pardon saying that those who systemized things did it evil unconsciously while thinking they did their best, even if I don't believe so, and the rest just deal with the system, try to make it work beautifully, reinforce it, try to make it last. But people still believe this system is good and logical, the way of things, the way to go, while it is the most unfair and evil that could be invented, the fastest way to the hole, and you think I'll trust people? I'm scared that soon unfairness and bullshit will cause death like never seen in the history of humanity, and isn't it always unfairness that causes the worst horrors of this world?

There can be a slight decrease in money value over time, but the extreme money devaluation of capitalism is mostly another tax paid by people who cannot profit from interest rates because they don't have big enough stashes of money. Money devaluation is an accessibility limitation to richness; it is a class separation tool, it is a race where you must enslave yourself to climb a pyramid, invest most of yourself for it because the pyramid steps are slowly, automatically, going down; if you stay at the same salary you eventually end-up poor, so you must always fight and compete to keep your position or climb, and that forces people to see money as an infinity need; you better stash lots of it if you want to live your exhausted old days comfortably...

The god seat competition keeps a maximum number of people dwelling in monetary difficulties and all kind of mental and physical health difficulties, troubles, conflicts and frustration displacements associated to their continual quest and fight to have enough money to live more correctly, for sane people, the rest want their car made out of gold to boast, or a big stash, to boast how they're successful, top 500... Things won't get any better if people make just enough money because they're minded and forced to try to climb a pyramid which continually grows under their feet from country debt. For more, add that to the effect of having after death transferable stashes of money which permits all kind of extremely unfair situations, all the while keeping a mentality associated to the stash in most instances.

These are a few facets of the ego gods ideology seeking the invincibility and eternality of its unfair ways, and the best way to get in a comfortable position is to have a very strong drive, or strongly implanted brainwash, to become popular, or to control, manipulate, profit, or to get an imposing stash of money. All the economic system goes in that direction with the ultimate tool for manipulators and profiteers; interest rates, which lead to another fundamental principle of this hell which should never have existed which is "money attracts money".

I guess there was an epoch where education in counting and writing was limited to some who had the time or resources for it, good for seeing others as inferiors, so a lot of books were written or modified by the "elite", those who controlled everything, and they manipulated both history and the way money worked. Today things work a bit differently but the result is still as efficient. My point is, we should never forget that we are a forever advancing result of history, and the success of the historical choices or beliefs we make can last a long time, like when we take decisions giving form to our vision of money. Still to this day we're stuck in heavily complex mental conflict from the influence of old religious and governmental bullshit philosophies, absolutely none making sense as a global thing, but of which we are fighting to the end to prove, dividing and competing over things that are all the same fundamentally, and "evil" at it...

So now you got interest rates which quickly became an invincible notion before someone like me that got too many things to think about could say; "wait a minute"... Profiteers are the ones that better geared their intelligence to profit from opportunities, they are always in a hurry to profit fast before someone more appropriate develops more complete and just judgment and philosophy about the matter, and shouting doesn't much work with limited people on a life quest to prove they're superior, or more intelligent, or to grow their self esteem beyond the "stars" (Become a T.V. "super" "star"! Who do you see the most on T.V? Politicians I think...)

Responsible and good people use credit well, and they are not supposed to pay a single cent of interest rate, but you can't ask that of credit companies and bankers who are in it to profit as much as possible; if you put money in their bank they'll make money by investing it, and if you borrow money from them, they'll make money from charging insane interest rates... As for ego people, they see interests as their money and it is an opportunity to profit from to own anything they can with it. And the system is made to get people to believe that credits is like their own money, as a way to push them to interest rates that are profits for banks, and when things crap out, either from the person who failed to pass hours understanding all the documentation, or from irresponsible attitudes, it all end up indebting others.

Presently, everybody is on interest rates this way or that, a lot to pay from sane principles, many to grow a stash for their old days. So bankers invest the money people deposit, and then they give back a fraction of their investments under the form of interests if people guarantee a stash in their banks for some time. So while those who are already in a position to better profit from interest rates get richer, lower end people will end-up losing more than they "invested" and they'll have to work harder for it, or lose it all, or go bankrupt. Evidently, I'm not talking about the market aspect of things, where the invested money take profits form before becoming interest rates for people. There are many aspects to investing money, and I'm not here to become an investor, particularly when the value of things is based on virtual buying and selling of shares of this or that which fluctuate as soon as someone fart, sitting investors are good for that...

What's the use of buying and selling on the fly shares of things you don't buy for using? Ah, trends, businesses are objects for investors to go emotive over, and the one with the biggest piece of the object controls it. Yes, businesses are personal things to me, and I see nothing wrong with the principle, in fact, the dynamic is good so I'll want it in the new reality, a boss can gain more money by selling half his business, and if he's too incompetent then he increase the risk that someone else take over. No problem, and I understand that money makes people emotive, because money is life, and there's an investment of energy, whatever the form, in a business, so if the "boss" want to risk it, his choice, as long as you don't disconnect money from life by basing its value on objects, which brings me on the aspect that I don't like of the market, which is buying and selling stuff without the goal of owing or using; this shouldn't exist, and the people doing money from this are useless money rats in my opinion. Yes you can do it for a store since the store has a use, but doing it without the goal of owning is not a good view, the same for buying 50 tons of sugar that you sell a few minutes later without it moving; if you don't do a job of at least carrying the sugar somewhere else or making it available under a different format, then you are just a number machine and you should be replaced by a computer. This is another economic area out of the reach of most people where some people get rich without being really valuable, and it's not like they're winning at lotto or trying to find a treasure, they're profiting from the fundamentals of life energy, messing with the true value of stuff (the value of life energy used in producing the good) in all kind of hypocrite ways.

As always, it's the exaggeration of egos out of control that overwhelm the good in using any notion in its best way; interest rates can be somewhat used for exceptional monetary help being given, or for broken trust, but it should be a last resort measure and based entirely on a part of the governmental budget to keep it away from becoming a form of inflation, in an economy based on the value of people, that is.

As for borrowing money (crediting), it is a trust issue, the vision of borrowing proportionally to one's value versus expected value is a good view, the problem is going back to neutral value before you die (again in an economy based on the value of people), and that's where interest rates should enter into action. Meaning that if people die leaving a debt behind, it can be socially accepted to reimburse these debts with interest rates, I personally would make them proportional to one's borrowed amount, and for that a percentage is perfect. I'd put 1% month (just a guessing number) interests for each 10% of maximum borrowing value.

The problem is that money shouldn't grow money by itself whatever the form, this is totally wrong; it's like saying that being human grows another human without reproduction. No chance they would teach any of this at school, too important knowledge. Even in its most basic view interest rates vastly profit the rich and vastly disadvantage the poor because most interest rates forms are a percentage thing that gives an exponential final amount dependent on the size of the amount on which the percentage is applied. As an example on a limited facet, someone who took (As I already explained, money is always taken from other people doing stuff) ten millions can usually find some way to have better interest rates than someone with ten thousands. Yet, under the same interest of 5% one will get a final amount of 500 000$ while the other have 500$. Such amounts may be peanuts to you, but to me they mean life and death. And I'm not talking about bankers and dealers of mortgages and commodity markets profiteers inventing interest rates in every corner to steal people's money, or its value that is not the same for the rich than for the poor. And exponential growth of money (worse than growing it in trees) should not even exist as I already said; money doesn't grow money (except in hell).

You can invent any justification for interest rates, I know they are a normal thing to you, they are necessary too, no doubt about it, but whatever the vision they should not be seen as a source of profits. This reality grows money in trees, not just from interest rates evidently, by printing money out of thin air too, which is worse, it's magic, money appears for some! Oh, they get rich and displace the problem to the situation where it appears, so it's not their fault...And my mother, and my father, they told me over and again that money doesn't grow in trees! Now I know they were lying to me, I just have to legally get a stash and it starts growing! I quickly knew in my young revolt that money really fructifies! We stripped it of its human connections and now it got a life of its own, it appears and make clones!

The compensation for the "money creates money" philosophy almost always end-up on the shoulders of the people who have other priorities than getting rich as a synonym of success. Most people will hardly live 1/3 of their lives comfortably while contributing to limited REER that won't give them much more than basic standard of living once they'll be old, and they'll pay a lot of life energy for that, but they won't say they lived that long as innocents, or with a wrong view, since it would hurt their pride... I hate all that, I'll never embark on this race after interest rates to make a stash for my old days only to end up realizing I had to save twice as much money to have the hyped effect, whatever it is good bankers or the best system that calculated the amount. And when people hit difficulties, they have a tendency to repair the problem with credit so it ends up on the shoulders of other people, or piled on the infinite continual debt on the future of humanity. All that while everybody sing how important children are to them, we'll see how present children will feel in 50 years, what they'll think of the importance we gave them and the world we condemned them to. For now, what you're forgetting in your children "love" (whatever you'd "love" them to stay innocent children to "love" them forever; they all become big like you...) is that you make them for profits, this system enforce the development of the intelligence of humanity mainly as a competition to profit from innocence.

So as we move the money from one pseudo justified facet of the system to the other so the culprit of troubles looks good we are still left with the big question; where is the money??? The people who profit form this, who are they??? Aliens? Professional sportsmen, "super" "stars", industrials, bankers, big businessmen, leaders of all kind, and those who invest tons of money to create PMBBD and hype and war. The ways of this system will forever channel human life energy to those most willing to do anything for it, which is the most limited vision of human worth. But that's what manipulators through history implanted as a fairness version in the brain of the population as the right way of things. And people believe they'd die or good stuff wouldn't exist if some wouldn't live in luxury or make unbelievable stashes, but it's not true, things would be far better, at least if you emphasized the selection toward different ideals. But yes, people would die and things would be bad if the population tried to remove the means from the hands of all those ego maniacs, they worked hard and it's their money (your life energy), surely they won't say they're not worth what they took by fair competition, you know, and they sure can buy more guns and bigger ones than you to protect their philosophy, just fair...

In the end, those who condemned humanity will bear the full responsibility for making hell, even if they just continued in the track of their ancestors, the power to change things is still where the fucking means are! And no innocence here, they know, you think I'm the first one to explain these things? They reject, deny or don't care so no pardon, responsibility is entirely on the shoulders of unfairly rich people and their needs, maybe except their admiring throngs that defend and encourage them, but those are more like a result; mind lost in the PMBBD indoctrination and hype effects overdrive from media people licking rich anuses all day long, so much it's a dependence and they need to make a culture of these things. And they can use as much PMBBD as they want with their admiring selection to make others responsible, contort every principles on publicity and hype, prepare themselves a national funeral, make others feel bad for not having a job, but in the end the responsibility is on them, where the means are, and the truth of their worth is profoundly evil, in the negative, whatever they pressure selected humanity to admire or idealize them, or dream of replacing them as they embark in their competition, while doing things better evidently...

The monetary system is all made to create the situation where life energy flows unfairly to some kind of people, and it's always a people's matter, the money is always there where there are people, it's your choice to make a fair distribution of it or a mess of manipulation until the mind of people is scrambled in inconsistency. You think I should owe something to somebody for surviving? No, you are wrong, the one that owe something to somebody got a castle, even if he got no debt, it's just the system that was made like that, to permit some to have a castle with a saint image (like the pope or Feline or politicians) while others are barely surviving and are often tagged as the source of problems; they don't work hard enough, or they are lazy or they profit from the system for their right to survival (comfort when you dare call yourself civilized), etc, etc. Anyway, the conflict with me is unique and fundamental, I may be the only one on this planet to see things like that, but I can't do otherwise, for me everything is a matter of life, money is life energy, when I do actions I do them thinking about life, if I see structures, I see them as life investments, and if that's too profound or fundamental to you, then maybe you need a reminder of the whole philosophy of life I follow here; I see all life as related to me, I owe something to animals, I have a responsibility with my capacities, my energy is not only mine, it is a whole life sacrifice, I'm the pride of solar life, life hope and dream through me, and I refuse to reveal as a stupidity, I refuse to fail it, I want to reveal its glory, in as many facets as possible.

So I limit my view greatly when I talk about money here, I do because I can accept that money be seen as serving civilization goals, but the truth is that I could go a lot farther and defend a view of money where people get some proportionally to their global worth of actions; my ideal would be to subtract evil from good and justified innocence then add the difference to a precise ladder of pay from contribution in attaining civilization goals. Or if you prefer; calculate all factors that make someone costly to life (the planet, resources, life energy, evolution, mind development, all what have a negative effect on life or the human, like PMBBD...) minus justified innocence, versus what is provided as benefits to life (that can be a job to help develop reality, or make people happy etc). That's the best way I found to quantify the worth of someone, while keeping in mind that there is a limit to that; your worth can't be a pressure to infinity. But I understand that this view is utopist, even if I believe we will somewhat come to that point one way or the other if we survive long enough, so I limit my view to money as serving the human civilization good goals.

I repeat that it is work value that is expressed and exchanged as money, it is the energy and skill someone spends to a task or to bear an attitude, so money is solely associated to high consciousness life. You may try PMBBD people into believing all kind of things to separate money from life and make it a material thing but the truth is that money is an exchange of life value. You must see a stash of money as a stash of human life, and for that you have to know the basic and maximum high consciousness life time value to have an economic system that makes sense. Next, these values are supposed to be decided by the global judgment of people, not a class of people who will force the rest to their position and their needs as what is most valuable. Finally, money, like people, must be treated individually, so the economic system must be able to see it as a single total composed of individual parts.

There are many factors to take in consideration when trying to know work value; the goals of society, the necessity, indispensability, priority, rarity of the work, the personal situation of the people, the difficulty of filling competency exigencies, etc, etc. And I'm not talking about attitudes which can be very valuable here; your job may as well be to take an attitude, like love attitudes, and carry it successfully, and this reality does it too some extent since some jobs are dependent from having this attitude or that. At the extreme, you can see such attitudes as culturally developed and the whole culture can be rewarded for taking the right attitude to make it a success, and that's in part the vision I have of cultural races. But that's for another reality, and I'm talking jobs specifically, one thing's for sure, work value presently is totally, completely, absolutely unjust, un-equilibrated, unfair, wrong, twisted, busted, stupid, contorted, crazy and senseless in this reality (look at synonyms for all those).

In the end, money is human life energy spent at jobs, that is all there is to it; if people stop doing jobs no bankers will have money, or in the current reality it will be worth nothing. Money is a reward system for wanted actions, in old times you bartered objects, money just replaced objects by a credit, you are credited an amount for an action, and you can spend that credit in whatever you want instead of exchanging tons of funky objects all over the place redundantly. That sounds nice and easy isn't it? The problem is that this is a bad start even if the principle is good, like transferring the pleasure system to the reward system to drive most people which logically pushed us to develop pyramidal civilizations. That's even logical philosophy stuff, everything starts badly, well, not everything, but a lot, let's say 50% will tend toward starting in the worst manner, in the name of life diversity in the universe...I would say this is more of the case for fundamental things, and it shouldn't concern personal life since we're supposed to experience and change on the fly, or far faster, from our parents and all kind of other sources, but I'm not talking genetics, which for us, should reinforce the emphasizes of our willpower. So in the logical continuation of things, we had to make a mess of the planet, or do our best from the worst situations, but at some point you stop building over rotten foundations and take the experience you gained to rebuild in a far better and more lasting way, and this is where we are today, and we should do it before we develop irreversible bad genetic emphasizes. The problem with this view of money is that we immediately put our life energy at the mercy of the best manipulators and profiteers by not connecting it to people fully, we just gave a value to objects and jobs, then let those in position of power decide its value and the way it moves, while forgetting that money in itself is power, controlling it is controlling people one way or the other.

The next step in my stroll through "basic economics revitalization", is updating the the concept of the unassociated wording "money" itself. Starting from the understanding that money is just a number to give value to actions or things, then you understand that metal and paper and cards are all there only to protect this number. Evidently, again, making money out of metal is a bad but necessary start, because not only you need to mine for metal and waste tons of it to express a number, but you automatically dehumanize it, and printing an animal on a side and a rich person on the other doesn't help, I would call this unconscious manipulation, because while you could say animals represent life and we owe something to life, and rich people make the world turn (in their theory) and we'll never admire them enough, just so I could say the intent is good since there is life all over the money, the fact remain that the money lands on one side or the other and this represent a choice. I'll let you guess my vision here. Exchanging material money almost makes it like something that is produced by machines and the amount in circulation is proportional to the size and performance of the machine. I'm exaggerating but my point is; when you buy something, you don't see money as something coming from the movement or energy of life, you see it as an anonymous thing falling in your hands or your account when you do a job and with which you pay for things. For you, things cost money and for the government, infrastructures or research or exploration or whatever, cost money.

Me, for the reality I'll design, I'll want physical money to have bunches of nobodies both sides and bunches of random animals both sides. It means, in the eventuality that we'll really want to do physical money, which shouldn't be necessary at the epoch we are, then it means that if we are to produce 100 bills of 5$ then half of them will bear animals both sides and half will have humans. Better, 20% for viruses, insects, animals, people and celestial bodies. But these days we can stick to the mathematics. Money is high consciousness life energy value transformed to mathematical numbers, and so the next step is communication, you can communicate this number with a wallet full of metal or paper, but it's still just a number, so money should be replaced by credits since we're supposed to deal with money as a whole of separated parts. You are credited for your work, you receive credit for your work, and not for supposed work.

Credit is at the wrong place in this reality, the action of guessing that you got what it takes to spend more credits than you have should be associated to that action of guessing, or betting, or calculating, or supposing, that you won't have an accident, whatever the form, tomorrow. Since a word is a word, I'll invent one that got an association with such meanings; borrowing!

If we want to have every citizen under a legal system of fair distribution of means, then we'll have to seek the elimination of palpable money, and for that everybody will have to be under a basis permitting them to be connected together through communication, it implies that a basis of communication and power (electric) must be given; it must become a guaranteed and sacred thing like potable water, a basis of civilization, particularly if we want everybody to deal with their numbers easily. When you have that, then there are no arguments not to call money "credits" because the value of it is transformed as information. And the same for replacing "pay" by "transfer". That may all sound strange but I'll tell you that if you asked me to choose, I'd have no problem adapting to that, and I don't adapt without reasons...For now, just reading or hearing "300 credits have been transferred to your name" would make me feel in a weird future in this very serious in façade reality that mainly live for entertainment.

In an ideal scenario we would eliminate tangible money and cards panoply and make a computerized central system, where money becomes a transfer of credits which can be followed anywhere, with some limitations like personal life, but for that, you need a totally different system too, one where it is global judgment that is the system, where no government or industrial can decide things, only concerned people.

Now, if you want people to believe naming stuff appropriately is just insignificant details then know that half the mess of this world has been made by people who manipulated insignificant looking details at a big scale. Everything has an importance or a meaning, even the color of things. Just ask anybody why they like their things this or that color and they'll give you reasons, meanings or uses, nothing exists without reasons. Our interpretation or judgment of these is relative, and you can manipulate with PMBBD, but there's always a reason or definition nearer the truth, or better, or more important than the rest, and we must defend it, even if it's become hard to deduct in a lot of instances, thanks to all the PMBBD and hype production of this reality. Now, the reason I have chosen colors is that it is an ambivalent example, because while people do give them a meaning, their signification are still very relative and personal, and making pubs with PMBBD repeated associations to colors, like rose is homosexual for men, or red is Canada or federalist, should be made illegal; I could say a black coat is a reflection of a black soul and I sometimes wear black, force too much stupid associations through pub, and I'll revolt and stop putting it on altogether, like I did with chocolate.

Money (credits) will always express the value we give to some actions (which should be decided by the mass by the way, surely not a gang "representing" it), and so it is human life energy (as a number computed by banks). And so, if we follow the logic of the bullshit where banks are creators of money, where we just have to reimburse the debt by printing money, we'd just devaluate the worth of the actions workers do until it is worth almost nothing, where the middle class is not much better than the poor class. Printing money can only be done from logical laws, here the law that permits the printing of more money that will not have a negative effect on masses is printing an amount for every citizen born, and so you must have a general value associated to human existence, and the amount of money in circulation should be a multiple of the number of people, and if people die their value is subtracted from the economy. The missing factor here is energy, the beating of the heart, so someone start at 100 of value (or whatever), and every day (or whatever), 100 is added for every living person. These values can be different but they remain the same for everybody that is part of the civilization, and when someone dies the whole amount of cumulated value (100 x 365 days x 90 years of life) is subtracted from the economy, and the system manages the form it takes, in the ideal of a living economy.

Next, we must change the energy behind money flow. Here it is done through division, competition, exploitation (of innocence and people's weaknesses in big part), control, fear, manipulation and more. There is not a single positive attribute associated with the flow of money in this reality (I'm not talking about what you do with money but how the money moves around). To have a true, good and fair monetary system, you must emphasizes its movement with good drives.

If you're part of a civilized bunch of people striving for the same fundamental goals, like colonizing another planet, then you must see your general worth as a energy going toward those goals, particularly if you're dependent from the reality, which is a normal state of being if you're a civilization that doesn't want to end in anarchy. That mean reality will see human life energy variables as a simple stash decided by all the people concerned by the different aspects of its expenditures. It mean you're worth 0 if you are not part of civilization, and if you're part then you show it by trusting reality to deal adequately with your life energy. Evidently adequately mean the laws of its existence must satisfy those concerned, and there are a few logical laws that must be followed just so you can bear hour head high in face of the universe, good and evil, like fairness which can take the form of having all logical needs of every citizens behaving civilized guaranteed proportionally to level of technology. Evidently, that doesn't work in an ego reality environment of competitive overpopulation.

Next, the only way to get a system "turning" is with jobs, and since money is a reward for actions, we can't say every action has the same value, then you got to keep a reward system alive that make sense too, the transformation of the pleasure system into the reward system is one step that separates us from animals and having an ego or competitive drive that is sane is a good thing and something you'll never eliminate anyways, but there is still my philosophy that people who don't feel unconsciously cheated bring something positive to civilization one way or the other, so having a "job" is very relative here. So, starting from 0 (or neutral value as civilized, or you can go to the extent of calculating the cost of a person at living basically), with your basic needs satisfied to comfort, some people will end-up with more means than others depending on what is seen as valuable to civilization, decided by concerned people, surely not manipulators and profiteers seeking entertainment as a priority. The trick is to make things fair, unless you don't want a reward system, in that case you give the same thing to everybody, but that would be top unfair to those who do more. The problem is that there will be forever less of a need for jobs in the future, thanks to automation, and to our "ancestors" who built stuff, and so the situation will be prone to more unfairness, not less. So, how to create jobs? By causing more problems to people, or by destroying automation, or with growth, but since there is a limit to it, you are better destroying with war to restart growth...Seriously though, here's how it really work in the universe of good advanced interstellar species; you end-up valuating a person in a maximum aspects of its life, what a good civilization with nothing else to do values more is exemplary attitudes, particularly if they can become genetic, and since you can't get all positive genetic diversity by seeking multiculturalism that lead to homogeneity, then you need a fair system to develop, protect and mix cultural races, always from fairness principles.

You can pass your whole life judging while the action takes place, funny eh? And profiteers run faster, that's how it works. Furthermore, he got big arms right behind, because it's nearer the basics of the pleasure system, less brains, more dependence, let's serve the first, a safe bet to get food. So it is not a single person that is supposed to wake up and fight, it is a majority of people, if it doesn't happen and the ones fighting against unjust things with a sane mind are a minority or worse, exceptional people fighting alone, then it means that that the high consciousness form has reached one of its limitation.

The worst thing the best life-form can do is run around to invent profit structures based on competition everywhere as a fundamental base for everything. Maybe there's a reason for judgment and consciousness to exist, maybe we should better understand the value of it since all life that existed to date died for its development...

Now, the monetary system is made to protect itself, if not it wouldn't exist, so no stasher is supposed to crash it, even if many of them could. But it's still all a scheme that better profit the most ego attitudes, at the most totality of proportional scale on the pyramids, with bankers, senators and the like of rich and powerful people at the top; don't ask yourself where some found the rights to get named to a position for life, or get immunity. This reality's monetary system is just a way to exploit people's energy and skills, somewhat chaining everybody to the building of the "pyramids". Don't you find it abnormal that all the monetary problems of most countries could be eliminated if the rich of the place, including top politicians, limited themselves to high standard of living instead of luxury, if they didn't stash millions? I bet the debt of countries could be erased by a very small percentage of people on top of their ego trip. But they passed the history of humanity developing their glory, and they think they're worth infinity so they'll die leaving a debt behind instead, if possible, but they're ready to spend a lot for their image, don't forget that one, so you can bet they'll want the philanthropist tag under the signature of their selfishes...

We're stuck in a competition of vampires feeding on the life energy of people, and when there is less jobs, they simply patent the system to keep making tons of money, without direct austerity measure preferably. But that may be difficult because capitalism (the current system, people call it capitalism) is highly dependent from growth and jobs, and growth will stagnate and automation means less job, except for prostitution and entertainment. So now that the vampires are fat fucks they can't stop eating and fucking while blood is becoming scarcer and since they're too big to fly anymore and they need luxury transportation. Something like that, we're lucky people are people and they can't stop living and reproducing...

The big profiteers of this world have been exploiting human life energy that was spent at jobs, and the less manual jobs, the more they will have to emphasize the jobs they like elsewhere or squeeze from people and take everywhere to keep their standard of living, unless they destroy all automation for people to work more.

Maybe we should totally invalidate today's money! Reset everything to zero! Like it's an idea, but in fact the reality I'll invent will do exactly that...Reset everything to 0... I was talking in this reality anyway, to free humanity of a batch of condemnations and ruin them rich criminals who work far too hard to legally steal money... But that's a bit ridiculous, they stashed all the gold and diamonds for themselves anyways, and it would change nothing about the ego-gods ideology which would grow back systems with people competing over richness or life energy.

I see money is a living thing and when someone exchanges some with me I think of it as an energy transfer; I don't take it all with a smile like a gift. Evidently, I don't pass my time thinking about it, but I sometime go to the extent of wondering about what effort was involved in the deal, but that doesn't go very far since I know that what we value the most as human energy spending presently is quite contrary to my priorities. I may even refuse money if I fell the deal is unfairly to my advantage, not that it it's an habit, let's just say it's my candor to do these kind of things, like my chocolate stand-off, or all this money I'm losing from not filling my tax reports because I'm revolted against Canada. One thing's for sure, it's not a big business like Bull Canada that would try to act fairly, they'll charge as much as possible and pay for a permanent team of lawyer to stay on the line of legality, variable in function of the country they are implanted in; they'll spend 2000$ to fight for the 50$ they forcefully tried to steal from me, which I never paid to the point of having no phone anymore, and I got to be careful or I'll go bankrupt a second time for my evil. No chance a proprietor would do that, lodging is a business, not a right, and they're ready to throw you to the streets in winter if you're a bit late at paying. People who don't necessarily accept any "legal" money are becoming a rarity these days, as the world forever gets better...

I sometimes even give some of my social assistance money to people in troubles, as long as I don't feel like they'll waste it. I don't do these things to prove myself I'm good, or to do my part against misery, no afterthought, no manipulation, it's just being a gentleman under the influence of my developing philosophy. People are surprised I give back my one cents, that's wasted cooper to me, I just "naturally" feel it is the thing to do, I don't want gold plated money, I don't like those symbols of the waste of metal we accept. I just can't believe I can use 3 pounds of heavy metal to pay for a bus ticket, and worthless at it since it's just to express a number. I don't understand, are people really after money so much that most of them actually collect one cents for some future use? I even have a hard time keeping 5 and 10 cents, they stay on the floor, they're not worth my effort. And I don't like it when people who have no better than a minimal standard of living give me more money than the rich for helping them. And I'm not supposed to do that, I do it mainly because I'm forced to by a totally invalid and unfair monetary system and philosophy in a reality that don't know what money is and its value, even resources.

I do know many people feel the wrongs of money, so I should be careful not to generalize too much, and people are condemned to the ways of this reality that sure won't forward their fair share of money for the effort they make, people have to compete and fight, and they still give, that's why I say half the people are still good in their soul, as it should be in hell, division, and the better form of the effort is provided by good people who have their good principles and good feeling intelligence manipulated and exploited with PMBBD, often by religious pacification institutions and psy science, and I'm not talking about different lifelong developing adaptation processes that this reality sure knows how to exploit to its own ends. I still think around half the population have an adequate attitude for a new way, but I'm kind of pessimist on the how to get them moving in a more adequate direction. I found the solution! I'll go take a walk and I'll suddenly become a lifelike living statue that stays in that exact state forever. Anybody on earth that just thinks he could gain something from the statue will suddenly disappear. I guess only me can imagine what kind of civilization would raise from such a joke, maybe it would take twice as long but the ego selection would be out of it and resources would be used constructively with principles and ideals, since the limitation would force the path. I wish to reformulate the universe to limit immediate survivability of self centered profitability, that should make life a little more complex but I'm sure it can be done.

I refuse to see money as a materialist competition, and my job in life is not to get money; that just doesn't fit in my mind, I should probably kill something in there to make more space for the monetary IQ, or is it a facet of being a Quebecker? Anyway, there are so many things I can't understand, and so many I simply don't want to...

Like I already explained for other facets of it, this economic system was a failure from the moment senseless notions existed to systemize its flow, from the moment we started growing money and started supposing innocent people from the future would be responsible for making things work or that they would pay for our creations or failures, that they would accept this reality for eternity, etc, etc. With interest rates competition and tax on objects, this "economy" is the grossest aberration that could be invented to permit a senseless, no limit amount of "inferior" people's life blood (money) to be sucked by the gods you "love" so much, and their family dynasties.

But you can't understand all the wrong of this system since no school, no parents, no yourself noticed that our vision of money was wrong, we accepted the whole kit with an open mouth and asked for more, or maybe you'd prefer I say you democratically voted for it, good democracy...We never took the time to develop the necessary individual consciousness skill to really think about what money is, it's the most important thing to life, its blood, but while we boasted how we cared for life (with our religions?) lamented about all the suffering, we decided to let evil decide the most important aspect of it. And yes we decided it, because it doesn't take much consciousness to understand its wrongs, but we blocked that part of our mind because battling for a better view means all kind of risks and unknowns in our indoctrinated to different priorities life, we didn't battle because we feared, anything and everything, so we huddled ourselves together, encouraged each other's, proved ourselves by twisting everything, and humanity became a working hard parody, temporary entertainment, and all solar life will fail for it because we refused to take the responsibility coming with our extraordinary capacities. We used our time to ignore, we made a system to stay innocent, and the greater the extent of the enforcement, the more systems we invented to hide our failings, the more happiness became a competition as the summum of the failure, a fight for happy moments in our ego life we think good because we do the social animal or spend our money where we want, and we do try, with good intents, but we still refuse to look at ourselves in truth, it's all an escape, let's find the like of ourselves and compete, let's pressure select out those with a different mental construction, if we all walk the same general path, if we all accept the economy as it is, if nobody fights against it, then we are good, the rest should consult.

At least it is a consolation to know that such insanities will die with us on this earth because I'd personally feel stupid and unworthy to carry humanity's system to other stars, think about it...And since we are supposed to be overwhelmed in extraterrestrial intelligence, I would be ashamed to compare our best system to theirs, think about it... Anyway, with so many aliens civilizations, we can act as ego as we want, they'll come to us, save us if we are in trouble, fall in "love" with our ideals, it's surely new stuff to them, think about it...well, I just hope they don't think like us...they're better be peaceful, accepting, tolerating, adapting, compassionate, respectful and all before showing up, they'll meet people in god's image after all, and throng of popular gods...

But who am I gonna impress with this shit? It is worthless explaining how this reality is twisted to massive future failure, people got better things to do, entertainment to watch, PMBBD to believe in, jobs to do, families to make, there is something for anybody! I should stop, it's worse than of no use, I'm just a complaining socially assisted moralist that profit from the system, I should get a job and fuck it, accept, tolerate, adapt peacefully, go to the psy, we're all in this together, social animal with a big brain run by hormones and chemicals.

You think those who are rich and control everything will read past the first page of my moralist book while responsibility doesn't hold in their cross side vision? And it is not because I demonize the rich that it means "lower end" people must not have a good consciousness and not make actions to show it, that's part of being human for everybody and the rich are not beyond that. I say take "your" legally stolen money and put it to plant a forest, try new systems, good cities, develop a moon base, help better agriculture, technologies, pay debts, develop new power systems, system to stop imposed pub, funds for basic sane lodging and free internet, make free meeting systems where typing love do give adequate results, free transportation systems, I know work is being done on most of these these things, but it's cheap work if it doesn't involve future profits, and there's a difference between a few million gotten from governmental grants and green bills taken here and there from businesses making a reasonable profit and the billions in the pockets of the rich. And I know too that this mentality doesn't work in this reality, you need to fit the way the economic system works, but do go ahead, spend the money you stash until you're back to only your personal jet or yacht, how many people got a personal jet? Or give any surplus beyond 250 000$ a year back to the government, maybe he'll finally lower taxes or inflation! Supposing you don't sleep with them and he doesn't spend it all on the military... Do something positive with it now that you manipulated to get it, politicians gangs and presidents too, what is your cost? All in all? Do you need to pay people to have a consciousness in your place? You're too superior and important? You make the world go round? And I'm not talking about a structures thing, where you got a company with an employee that do the job of recycling stuff, I don't need to write another 2 pages to tell you all what you can do, it is an attitude thing, you don't act like a pig because there is an inferior on the pyramid that will repair or clean your mess with the help of your pointing finger, and if not then dump the problem on people not born, exactly like what the rich do in this reality with their castle and 3 cars, the stuff the selection would want if you left the means in their pockets, ruining the earth, so no way out of it in this reality, I'm just wrong, do carry on...

People with a good vision of life could work as associated to make a better world without this book hassle to blast at mentalities and beliefs that are destroying everything, but people are too divided, even at the most fundamental level where good and evil define their actions, they are a mess of all kind of philosophies that don't make enough sense to resist surface logic. Most people (I should say adults, the well adapted, which should amount to around 50% of the population) think they do what they're supposed to do, and don't challenge them, you'll see they got a very inflated opinion of themselves, and a gravely twisted view of good and evil, when they have one and don't just follow the law. Did you ever try to convince someone with too high a self esteem that his most basic philosophy is wrong? So I'm wasting my time, even if I had to explain these things. Still, if I had spent these 10 years working solely to design a city or system in association with sane creative people, we'd already have something extraordinary in hands, and I feel this in my guts, and I'd have been comfortable at it, not frustrated or revolted, and I'd been glad to enjoy acceptable behavior for it, which include spending some money. But I'm so tired of justifying now, I went through so much discouragement putting into words what I always felt in my soul, that I'm at the end of motivation and perseverance, craziness was just an illusion at it, my heart is broken, all is left is resolve, even if my emotions are still there like a torus to drive me forward with the help of life as my horse, and this one is always there, and this one knows pain beyond anything I'll ever feel, so I won't abandon it.

I was not born with a sticker "Awesome Canadian" in the face; I was born no better than the first human was, maybe a little better, more probably worse, anyway, sorry to disappoint you but he was not chained to an ego reality. So don't try to control me by dumping the evils of this system based on an ego philosophy on my shoulders, it is not my responsibility to pay for this biggest ego competition, even if you try giving competition every positive attributes you can PMBBD people to believe in. People who truly change mentalities are absolutely not responsible for the mistakes of their ancestors. If you don't encourage a wrong way of doing things or stop doing it, even if you don't walk a new, better way, then you are not part of that wrong way or not anymore. It's the only true chance at pardon you can have and the creation of a better way. Spending some of your energy for the better way is still better, but the energy you spend on yourself is the minimum.

I'll hate all slave systems, even if they enslave people democratically while singing liberty (I won't start on liberty) and you can boast how good you are for providing social assistance to the point that people feel bad for it, the truth is what can you do with people without jobs? Or worse, people like me who simply refuse to be a part of it? You can't go live in the forest since the forest have become a protected zoo where you need a permit to do anything and that cost money and you don't get very educated there. "They" could kill you, but revolt would follow, you can kill yourself but we're already at the limit at that, and they sure don't want it to become visual or evident enough, it could spread... Becoming a criminal is not that bad, at least neutral for the economy; sell drugs, steal cars, become a prostitute, good, that way you are seen as bad, it is you that is a problem and eventually, you'll think it is the case and you'll start endorsing the system to repent, kind of. Lastly "they" (controlling people) let you survive; they provide the minimum of money necessary so you can survive, that's the best all round options when you think about it, but there is nothing extraordinary here, you think a politician would get elected if he said he would kill everybody that don't work for the system? No, so they have no choice to provide survival means, that's all, and those who think they are good for permitting others to survive are all wrong, and nobody should feel bad for taking the means to survive, whatever their mentality (well, except evil people, but those have less of a tendency to feel bad). Now, how can true love thrive under such pressure conditions? Even the normal work conditions of this reality have a tremendously negative effect on love.

What you must understand with my vision of life is that I'm entitled to all the fundamental rights of the situation I'm part of when I'm born, which is necessarily a big part of a vision of good and evil that I believe nobody can argue against. I won't go to the full complexity of it, my whole vision of good and evil is involved, but let's say that I'm entitled to survive proportionally to the removal of the condemnations imposed by the historical development of reality, made by people like me. It means people of old times are not supposed to condemn me with their old view that didn't include advanced bioengineering, or atomics, or women voting, or climate change or whatever. Or, if you prefer, a civilized civilization cannot condemn its people to work for it, all who do will fail, as simple as that. I'm born as a high consciousness guy and you'll treat me as such, and the system you'll make will let me explore said system without becoming enslaved to it, at whatever level of evolution or technology you are versus all the needs of life success. Today that amounts to living comfortably while having the possibility of understanding your system that you boast as the best to know if my opinion is the same as yours, and doing that while keeping my sanity. And sorry if not many people do, it's understandable that this reality is an historical development of many condemnations, you need people to get an education and start working fast, and you don't want people to go crazy and revolt like me, and sorry if I have to write so virulently because it is sure not through your voting that I'll get what I want...I'll let you guess all my needs now, but you'll have them as the basis of the reality I'll invent, which are my fundamental rights, and let me tell you that this system is an absurd failure at that, and I live in the best country of the world.

I should add, for all those who think employment should be the most important thing to one's life, or that it's some kind of proof that you're good, that unemployment is totally normal and will always fluctuate. Personally I don't want to work like crazy, I want to live comfortably, I want to help people around me, I want things, and I'm ready to do some work for that. I want to live in a reality where boring and uninteresting jobs are automated too, where I only do cool things. Now, say in a thousand years, that we only need 1/10 th the numbers of jobs we have today to live well, does that mean we should be 10 times less people on earth just so everybody have a job? And the problem would still be the same, 10 times less peoples "equals" 10 times less needs for production thus only 1/10 th of people would have jobs in very general theory. So you see, we have to change the schema of human value, unless you want to make bigger armies and more police and more psy and more entertainment, but there is already a lot of that. Another thing we'll have to do for everybody to live comfortably without much job to do is to make a salary ceiling, like nobody should have the right to make more than 250 000$ a year, and we'll have to enlarge work accessibility so more people can do some jobs too. Furthermore, specialty will have to be better divided and concentrated while computerized automatic work distribution engines algorithms will have to be developed, that way you won't have the stupid extremes of this reality where as soon as you get a job you are squeezed out of your energy (time) while there are people who could do the same job doing nothing. Finally, we'll have to make a fair system in all aspect that we can influence as a high consciousness species. One of the result of that will be logically controlled birthrate, call it natural if you will, from knowledge, not out of competition or to feel like we're big givers of life as a responsibility.

You don't like my vision of fair and good monetary principles? Then you just had to do things fair, ok? You don't like my attitude? You can't even tolerate the stuff once in your lifetime? Then you just had to make a fair reality so people like me don't revolt, ok? And if you think my vision is too utopist, or childish in your self-importance, then maybe it's because you're not worth to be called a civilization. Arrange your shit so me too I think everything is gonna be allright, or do with my report on your incoming failure and the way I see out of it.

I say the whole economic system and the whole political system should have been replaced long ago, or destroyed. If we are still encouraging it it's because people have been made dependent of it, with PMBBD in big part. The system wants people to stay innocent (ignore) of fundamental wrongs. It wants people as numbers, with color and controlled emotions as a façade, a workforce that build things while enriching a profiteer and making entertainment, and they can't act to change things since they can't sustain principles, all their willpower is used to adapt, tolerate, accept, or blow a gasket and end-up in front of a psy. They are bricks, system people, institutionalized, religious of different intensities, condemned, all pushing in the same direction, made to admire manipulators on hype, they encourage momentum by self-existence; they just exist in their interdependence, making the reality impossible to change. I may be a bit hard, people do work hard, they raise family, follow the law, etc. unless they feel bad, that should be enough for most. That's not much better, maybe a lot of people don't care any more than this, but a lot of people want to try to do better too, but are they willing to look beyond what the reality projects, do they act like they have a mind of their own or like reality should provide them with all options for their directions? Don't forget everything that was created by people started as independent imagination, if good people only raise a family and do a hard working job, then the useful aspect of imagination, of creation, will be left to people who will want to profit from their hard work. That's a bit simplistic, evidently, I know people are not robots, they are human resources, and they still use their imagination a lot. It's understandable too that people shouldn't have to go insane understanding an insane reality, but there's a principle proportional to population here, a taboo secret... Even protesters today seems very insignificant, I don't hear from protesters anywhere in the world, except when someone marginalized publicized gets assassinated (not me, I'm not publicized as someone that reap bad attitudes, because I can't be absorbed by the dragon, digesting me is very bad for your system, but not doing it spells your death too...), or when it's time to topple a dictator, or separate a country, yet, there's always a protest around in my place, while the world is so peaceful, except when there's a cataclysm. Little house protests, bitching over the crumbs, personal things made big.

Almost everything in this reality proves the wrong view of those who systematized things, and they stuffed people with so much PMBBD they can't see evidences anymore. People think they decide but they are wrong or blind or they are lost in the complex mess that was created to keep them innocent and easy to manipulate for profiting, or they never had any influence on many critically important matters. And now people have their head full of conflicts and can now only bitch on details.

In the end, you don't get out out of hell by trying to make hell a nice or fun place to be, particularly if life change itself genetically for it, particularly if you made it impossible to change its fundamentals by interdicting all risky philosophies. It's like eliminating the "inferiors" variations of humans you feared the most through history, then start singing peace, acceptance, compassion, tolerance, adaptation etc, as the new philosophy, while imprisoning everybody acting violent that is not doing it under the will of those controlling everything and having all means, destroying the diversity they fear, violently or hypocritically, and with PMBBD it is all logical, you'll pay for it, you'll even like it!

If this reality doesn't want to try different ways of doing things that are complete and not meant to condemn people still more, then it must be forced with war, suicidal war if we must; "We're going to have to act, if we want to live in a different world" (a woman said in an old dos command and conquer song) and it's getting too late to act.

We must use experience gained to start over and do everything under different principles, and it is now that it must be done, and good luck doing it without war; you think those who took the means or control things will want a different reality? No, not really, besides, they worked hard and followed their laws without cheating (they say), and they got everything they want in this reality, it is their place, and they got the police, the army, the TV (PMBBD), all the bombs we worked so hard to produce. Still doing it peacefully is possible, if they want it (they got and control all the means), and if people want it too. But that may become practically impossible as people refuse to go beyond the willful innocence they need to persevere, we will wait until too late instead, then we will fight in bullshit, and for nothing since too late is too late.

If we truly want to have a chance to go beyond earth we will have to make a system that will better encourage different attitudes, re-glorify many principles we twisted to serve manipulators and profiteers. We must have a system of philosophies that will make us live in harmony with our conscience to the maximum of our logical ability until it becomes easy, even unconscious, doing it with good selection principles, like love, and that means people must absolutely have a basis where they are not in a competition to get money to feel minimally well, and no PMBBD pressures to make them feel bad if they don't seek to work like crazy. If we can't surpass our ego pyramidal reality and we continue growing it, then we have reached our consciousness limit as a species; whatever the level of our others skills, however big the gods we'll create, and however fantastic the structures we will build to show-off or the technologies we'll develop. The size of an ego can grow with accomplishment but you must see it in a global accomplishment way too, now is not the time for growing our ego like crazy, we have better things to accomplish.

But ego gangs don't truly care about these things, they only live 100 years, so they take without control unless it attacks their reputation, then again. The farthest they can see is the amount of their profits, farther than that they need to drape themselves in their flags and be backed up by nukes, divide and compete to reign, or find an enemy to reign, or dust to dust. Their brain mostly works in a competitive or controlling way out of fear of losing their self-brainwashed invention of a culture for control. The top gods spend more in potential mass killings than they invest in space tech which they have no choice to invest in since it bring votes and it is good for the ego competition. I'm talking the emphasis of the attitudes that end-up with the means here, not everybody, do you think I'll become president? God no! I could mess up everything, and I wouldn't want the next to scrap my work because I revolted the selection, so I'm exactly where I should be in this reality...

For thousands of years all of humanity's energy have been spent growing pyramids, fortifying them, protecting them, making them more complex, building fantastic pools of arguments, PMBBD and tricks to prevent any different structure of reality or mentality from seeing the light of the day, they're ready to destroy all humanity just so that in the end only "god" will stand to say "see, I told you we had the best or the only system that worked, since the last thing standing is someone representing it!"

Having changed our manipulative, profiting and competition mentalities a thousand years ago, stopped all this bickering and war between ourselves, I'm sure the year 2000 could have shown us as ready for a base on the moon, with a spacecraft with some gravity in it that can travel around a hundred people in our system. We don't have any of this; instead we have a throng of rich people traveling around in jets and a super developed war and killing machine turned against ourselves, and I'm skipping the life extinction and global warming and love mentalities and suicide aspects...Instead of being on the track of a guaranteed future we have an uncertain one with a strong tendency toward civilization condemnation to extinction.

You can look at it this way too; as we waste time and energy in ego popularity power-trips, we miss all along our history rewarding opportunities and discoveries, even gifts. We reap what we sow on our soil, we decide the way of our future from our priorities, or what we wasted versus the good we attained toward life's goals, in part. And we don't have to compete to win, there is no winner, it's a mentality thing, even if the competition spirit is a good view for surpassing oneself; you want to do as good or better than other humans, surely not worst, so competition is a natural and a good thing, again it is profiteers who twisted the good of it by making of everything a competition for profits. The best use of competition is fun, you can make all kind of competing things if you emphasize it on that, but you never sacrifice human wellbeing or evolution or abilities (like judgment) for competition (like condemning or hiding tech or information to keep an edge), the worst you can do with competition is to make it a civilization systematization at all levels, that's the absolute worst thing you can do, you'll build a joke of a civilization, a sarcastic and cynic joke where the biggest laughers are the most ego ones, and the most serious.

Competition and particularly racism among humans, except for fun, makes equilibrium and fairness impossible, and without a minimum of equilibrium there is no survival, and the brainwash for competition has been so strongly implanted as a final philosophy that it may very well be impossible to adjust in sense, since we made competitions out of every human aspects for profits. I say watch movies, play games and sports, make car races etc, all in all, entertainment. These are perfect places to invent and find enemies and competition. And that applies to all of those countries taking the example of great America, doing everything to compete with it, to all those powerful politicians in the country competition, all of you, I say you are completely out of your mind.

Country competition is a limiting and slowing factor in reaching higher theorizing and better knowledge, and you lose a lot of efficiency and evolution by the process of repetition. And don't give me PMBBD arguments for repetition, competition etc... did we go to the moon 2 times so we could stamp 2 different traces of boots? No, we went there as the first, always for a first and there are many first in such a project (you absolutely don't need competition to be a first) even if our reasons were absolutely wrong as we went there when we were not ready, out of country nationalist racist competition, and instead of working together we spent twice a monstrous amount for nothing except to plant a country flag for the United State, not for humanity. And then we'll wait an interminable time and tons of resources competing until someone decides it's time to build something there, then if profits are made everybody will get scared to lose profit or advantages to some other competitor, so they'll start doing it too, like we do on earth, and the militarization of the moon will begin after a few competitive bases have been built. Where ego people go, bombs follow; it will start with a few hand guns and they'll grow in size and quantity as time passes. Hurrah competition! But I won't go any farther in this direction as half of this planet exploitation, production, pollution, killing etc...is done in the name of countries and their invention of racist pseudo culture competition manipulation bullshit brainwash and control for profits. At least nobody decided that competing for moon lands was a good idea, but there's this part I find quite interesting where it mentions that that the moon is there for the good of all humans and that's why no state can own lunar lands. That logically mean the earth is not there for the good of all humans, and that's why states can own earth lands, and you know what? It's true! Yes, because the ideal system of managing earth lands I invented, which is entirely feasible, completely eliminates the notion of states owing earth lands. And all that goes hand in hand with my opinion that the country competition vision of the earth is not only evil, but will have been a critical aspect of making hell out of the earth. 2/4

Ego can let you reach unbelievable peaks, but one of its complexities and lesson is that you cannot ever satisfy it in its totality; if you could do it, you'd lose all dreams, even existence. Consciousness of one's ego is the way to gain its control and the limit to ego satisfaction someone gets must be dictated by the judgment of all, where the ego potential of a specie lives in its totality (know the quantity you can express), a group can't systemize things to condemn others to a fraction of their good self, and absolutely not a few individuals either, more so if see it as an infinite thing. Finally, consciousness let you play and even have fun with your ego through introspection.

You are tired to read that word "ego"? It's not surprising; you'd prefer to skip thinking of yourself under this aspect, develop a few skills to become superior, gain control, fame, money, etc, follow the fastest and easiest way to personal satisfaction, while the more globally developed people will arrive later and find everything in the belly of the beast as slurry, ready for crap. But I'm hard, it's true that everything is parented so people can only embark in the competitions, if not they die! Of malnourishment? Probably not, they die of lack of social standard self-esteem, the social animal ideal of psy, or they die out of marriage, or something like that, failing to attain their recipe of success they took too early from some guy on TV, probably a rich person, they fall in drugs and die! It's all a horror story, where in the front of failure you justify that your consciousness takes a long time to form from experience, you're a momentum from the past, and now you need support, unless you do something stupid, because there is always a source of hope. Depends, there are many exceptions.

Ego people are the first to manipulate things and they do it for their helpers first, and sorry if I can't run as fast, good people that are complete develop more slowly, and they develop more than the skills to profit a maximum or to be treated like gods, they need to develop a sane view of good and evil, and they need to think farther and more logical. If profiteers and manipulators are not limited they can overwhelm everything, eliminating any possibility for another way. There are many monetary facets developed to serve a very limited class of people, and when they are systemized and interrelated interdependent with everything and accepted by most people, I call that condemnations, or reality invalidating arguments, or things that can lead to high consciousness failure. Their signification, their invincibility, their extrapolations, their condemnation, they limit us to a path that don't make things better even if their illusions are so big that logic say we should be living in a paradise with things so well patented. And that's the difference between true needed changes and the cosmetic changes politicians always do in their best democrato-canibalo, doggy-doggy, jump-jump, crap in the bag best system, they'll never remove a reality condemnation, they'll add more to protect their system instead. I should add that it is often too late healing a cancer, even if the person is still alive, and image is not a reflection of health, some are even a week away from guaranteed death and they still carry an healthy image.

If we were not so constrained by time maybe we'd better develop some attitudes or mentalities, or seek better knowledge; a lifetime is never enough to lose all innocence, even if it's as important to have deep specializations along more global ones. Again it's the goal that's important, the ideal. Everybody wants more time and most try to steal other people's time, everything is dependent on time, changing the ways or value of time can severely shake a reality and that's another reason why I believe it is important to have a safe and stable basis from which we can do what we want, it would give people more possession and control of their time, more liberty if you prefer, as they gain more consciousness.

But that's a bit utopist, particularly in this reality where too many people are frustrated not to attain the vision of success they have chosen, and they're under a panoply of pressures, so truly letting time to people would just surface their unconsciously implanted from birth ego philosophy. For most they'd just do stupid things, whatever they have money or not, since stupidity can take any relative form, like gaining experience, or like taking other people's money to spend it on personal luxuries by growing it in trees.

Anyway, time is too standardized and compartmentalized (this word really exist?) in this reality for people to act well with money (human life energy), even our emotions are more and more time dependent too. And don't twist or confound with controlled or canalized or cumulated emotions, I'm talking about the lasting time of many of them, developing a person fully takes lots of time, particularly developing true (good) consciousness, you need to pass lots of time thinking out of socialization. But this reality wouldn't want that for sure, in the name of the economy and keeping peoples under control, following the selected path which composes the mass that is made to fit. In fact, it will say, and try to prove scientifically, evidently, that independence or individuality is bad, and when the best system will go wild, they'll even manipulate with pretty social studies to prove that independence and individuality was the cause, surely not unfairness, and it will work because that's the system, it will do everything possible to get the mass to follow its way, while keeping it divided over facets, to keep it ignorant of the true source of all problems.

The system is meant to compartment everything for division, standardization and competition, they want people as recipes produced in industries at the chain, which they forever fail at doing, and always will. They want robots (under the form of human resources) that make jeans and buy jeans with the money "given" to them, and buy the shoes made by other robots who buy the jeans, and both buy the food made by that other robots. Then the 2 or the 3 exploiters meet for supper, call it the G7 for an extreme extrapolation (G stands for Great Gang of Grand Giant Good Gods standing on the "G" point summit, you're bound to have an orgasm with that, the rest are inferior little that dream "G"...they wouldn't be given advantages, they're not worth it, they're better be more crazily competitive if they want to be part of the "G" gang, and get more of the secret stuff that should not be divulged to inferiors. We are gods after all, the 7 Gods, or is it 20 now? Got to find more names that begin by G, they are Glorious, they are Gorgeous, they are Gargantuan... That's how we manipulate the unconscious, and it's easy to say these are stupidities, but you think they threw dices to choose a name? They could have chosen "A" for association, or "C" for conglomerate, greatly limiting extrapolations, but the ways of the reality dictated that G was the logical name, and "A" sound bizarre like me...G means that it is associated to self-possession and superiority competition, it means, "we're big", while "A" can't fit because it remove self-inflation from the equation; we're great or gods, but working as an efficient association is another manner. And I don't mean associations like the UN (United Nationalists) which is not much better in meaning, I mean all people association to efficiently reach good goals in truth without profiting from a situation; are they really working that way to reach the Kyoto goal? I'll bet it will be a failure because they're a bunch of Grand ego politicians very good for babbling eternally while making a wonderful image, more concerned about the next election than to really make a better world. Ego people "naturally" form Gangs to strengthen or protect their possessions (can be control over people by a system) while developing the path to more of all what they dream about whatever the hypocrite way it is done, like boasting that they only have a little 500 000$ salary when they patented the system to live in luxury without spending for most of it, and after their shift, they'll have a very fat pension for the rest of their life, even a national funeral when they'll die, if they've been "G" enough...

You really think Kyoto will be a success? I'll bet that in all those big and fantastically expensive meeting of the Greatest Gang (G7), nobody will suggest using its military machine to do some real good for once in their whole history, by fighting for such a cause as climate change control, anyway, it doesn't have a sufficient potential to bring much profit (I'm not talking about show-off public relation events, like cataclysms they use to shine their images between the violent mentality enforcement campaigns commanded by their nationalist leaders.) Yes there will be improvements, after many very expensive and important full carbon emission luxury meetings, 20 years later, some efforts will be made, mainly political moves on the back of normal better efficiency from new tech, we may reduce co2 production 15-30% for 2050 that way (after 60 years running, an industry is replaced with better tech, normal, and you better rebuild with some carbon filters if they're not too expensive), but it's far from enough, and it will be too late, even if we take things seriously; we had to have sufficient judgment to take things seriously at Kyoto, while not ignoring any factor like co2 lack of absorption, there is not only co2 production. An effort to reduce population (the industrial base) would help too, and since I got a tendency to regularly find big missing factors in the scientific methodology, and since the true problem is global warming, I wonder if a billion air conditioners can have an effect? I'm not saying we should not have those, I just wonder, and the same for those gigantic glass towers that need an industrial acclimatization system because they are totally inefficient at both keeping cool in the summer or warm in the winter, but it's not me that decide these things, and glass buildings are cute, and ego people are very fond of cute or glittering things...And what about 5 billion gas engines? I'm not talking about pollution, but about the heat itself? Doesn't burning stuff creates heat? Maybe I'm wrong, and what about air pollution from burning stuff, all these particles don't add to the doesn't but

Next they're talking about trading carbon, let's make a market out of something nobody wants, sounds a lot like counter intuitivity here, what do you think will happen? I hope nobody will start producing it cheap...And the problem is so big that you're asking governments to embark in something that will affect the whole economy of the country, and they never have money, always poor, I don't know where the money ends-up, but you can bet that they'll find a way to direct people's money to sell freaking carbon that's just everywhere, they'll cut spending on infrastructures for years until things are all decrepit, then they'll increase austerity, while the rich industrialists travel around in personal jets to go meet their politician friends, or make billions dollars stashes for their old days because it's not for their children or friends or family, it's for Africans! Maybe it could work if people were raised with different priorities in life than competition, but in this reality it will all end-up as a competition of who is better at manipulating numbers, manipulation and bullshit and profits...

Worse, if we compare the tangent of political babbling power to the reduction of nuclear arsenal reduction act, then it will be a magisterial failure; nuclear weapons "emissions" just stalled for some time, and went back on the rise, and technology is just used to keep them more operational. Probably co2 will level itself for some years, then it will be back on the rise because technology will be seen as opportunities by governments to just keep on with the "economy" as the priority, which is bound to fail on all levels too, eventually.

In fact, I should use Kyoto as a hint in the potential of humanity to take a different attitude before catastrophic situations. And this is a slow situation here, we have the time to act. In fact, my opinion that humanity will have lost its potential in 100 years (around 2110, the end.) fits quite well with how people reacted to climate change. That's why I shouldn't always put the fault on those with the means, people as a mass are the means too, and they act like the problem should disappear like magic. And I understand that they believe in the system, and I understand that they're in a competition to get money, but I don't see millions of people protesting here, they don't even vote for the green parties of their place, and this should be a bit of a reflection of how people really care.

In 1930 someone was talking about climate change and the rising temperature of the U.S., and the phenomenon became well understood widespread knowledge in 1960. So let's put the spark at 1960, in 2000 scientist are still divided on the matter we're in full blown bullshit competition and division over the subject while gauging responsibility; they say we are responsible for a small percentage, 2% or something, of the production of co2, what is that? Just 2% , not our fault, Nostradamus said we had no responsibility in nothing anyways, I's all written in the smog...And that's about the sole argument they'll use to make their studies (presently); our production of co2. Their methodology doesn't bring them to consider that we could be the cause of a decrease of its absorption too, you know, by cutting forests and spreading asphalt...They say the temperature will increase by 3-4 degrees or something within the next 100 years, because it increased one degree in the last 20 years or so, strange that this single degree is enough to melt the north pole...

But everybody knows Kyoto, it's the big thing that will change everything, tons of politicians will go there with their personal jets to try the best food and lodging of the place! While competing to look important or near the people, as long as they can make a little speech and sign a business deal...That sounds like it, but from this day on, whatever you do the denial thing or not, you know that global warming is bad for life, and there's nothing wrong acting in a good manner for life anyways; even if we can survive we'll let life suffer to massive extinction in the name of this reality? Any minimally informed person knows that life is under a mass extinction because of the way we do things. Yet both the "innocent" and his "innocent" boss, after 50 years and evident climate problems, failed to take the means to modify reality adequately, they are still bitching and divided, and the most powerful is not even an example, while it got the biggest consumer base and is the biggest producer, why? Because some rich could get poorer! Let's see in 25 years, I bet we'll be competing and bitching and throwing responsibility around. And this is only one example on the fantastic pile of good things that people failed to defend the integrity of by willfully not taking the better path, by finding shitty arguments to discard responsibility and carry on as usual, even denial has become an argument, yeah, "I'm in denial so I'm justified for party!"...

For now if it's not the greenhouse effect, it's the overheating phase from the sun, or the glaciation phase for contrarians, or the "everything is all-right" phase, for those to whom everything is all-right and going the way it should and people thinking the contrary are stupid not to enjoy, or the "seen it all" phase for New Yorkers. While rising temperatures can come from many related factors, you must not think it's what decided me to write, fairness, life and love decided me to write, and as a person who see the earth in a hell phase, you know I believe there can be many factors that will come together and cause our failure, people themselves in the system they made mainly. Still, some experts are so dependent from their government they say that everything is normal, that it is the normal cycle of heating up after a glaciations, that the sun is increasing activity. Yet, others experts say that we are supposed to be coming at the beginning of a new glaciations epoch and that the cycle takes a million years to repeat (something like that) it is very, very slow. We should be getting 1 degree colder every 100 years or so, and the sun is decreasing activity.

But all of this is not important as hell's oven is on broil and we're becoming darker and getting more cancer while the sun have a lowered activity, what will it be when it will decide to go back normal? All of a sudden, in the last 50 years, those years where we finally have the technology to systematize pyramids all over the planet, where the success of the pressure selection permit the thriving of millions of disproportionate godly egos while the rest work hard to follow, suddenly we are not only not getting the predicted glaciation epoch, we're getting contrary results, we are slowly getting around 1 degree hotter every decennia while we're competing about if there is climate change or not. What will it be in 100 years?

We're damn lucky there is so much water to evaporate to hide the sun and clean things a bit or we'd already be really cooking! Next, higher temperatures could end-up unleashing more earthquakes, more volcanoes, and tsunamis, but yeah; if too many volcanoes woke up all of a sudden to darken the sky, we could get an icing hell instead of a burning one.

The reality of things is that the biggest effect on climate change is overpopulation, we should have kept thing around 5 billion people, which means that this reality proved its inadequacy as soon as people couldn't control their birthrate naturally, for all kind of reasons. I know that as a member of this reality you believe people can't do that by themselves, but there are many factors you don't compute in your equation. The joke here is that overpopulation has become a taboo like the word "race" in the name of defending the ideals of this reality, so overpopulation is not mentioned because it's like chopping clitorises and this reality wants a maximum of people consuming more in the name of the economy. I'd say it won't stop for as long as we're not 12 billion people, because we could be that many if we were doing things perfectly, but that's very far from the case and this is becoming a fatal mistake. And contraception is not an argument, contraception is a logical, people like to have sex, which is sure not something this reality will be against, neither me, and since love is a civilized thing, then you want the option to have sex or deep body contacts and feelings, without the baby. Not only that, but contraceptive sex can be an argument defending the same mentality of overpopulation in case many people die; just stop contraceptive production and birthrate will increase from sex momentum. That being said, for as long as we don't encourage people to make less babies, which would be a slow remedy to many problematic aspects of society, a lot concerning pollution, then experts can say what they want, that climate change come from us or the inside of the earth or the sun or aliens, the fact remains that even half of today's population living well is too much a stress for the planet, and for ourselves and life, and "god" knows life can be quickly wiped out... Presently, the long term goal of living on another planet can't compare in importance to country competition or the war machine or political machine or the rich machine or PMBBD machine; these things and more are meant for a species that has not the brains to manage its population adequately.
We need a totally different reality where we can put our energy to better uses while being globally happier. But what I wanted to say is that the heating up of the planet is an argument for caution, minimally (when you got the accelerator pinned to the floor and see a wall coming what do you do?), and it stays only one argument in the many I'll use against this reality.

Now that we're in hell, and the leadership structure proved inappropriate, it may be too late for prevention or to apply any good principles the conscious people may have come up with, since people with the means never truly cared, nothing can be done, the measures needed to guarantee long term survival cannot be applied to this reality's state of mind.

Let's kill all the rich and their defenders, if there are half people left, then good, life will take a break, it will survive longer, and some more adequate mentality will carry what's left of solar life to the stars, with the pride of its most developed forms instead of shame... But maybe it's too late for the pride about life thing, I'd be ashamed to show what's left of earth life diversity to another civilization that evolved adequately, (I mean with adequate priorities), I'd be ashamed of having had to kill half of people to change path, to be the member of a race that utterly failed to stand for good things associated. At least we'll have dogs and cats and things like horses and cows to show how we cared for earth life! Yeah, everybody gets these kind of animals, it's another matter for the thousands of unique and important wild animals that we killed to extinction, yeah, let's show em evil "aliens" how good we are with life, watch our history and how the selection and its bosses cared, and how those who truly cared were treated! Who cares eh! I guess to care we'll have to wait for other civilizations to start rummaging through our history to deduct if we are good enough to be trusted...

But nobody is lucky having to stop encouraging a reality that profits from innocence as much as it can, even encouraging it with PMBBD, so I shouldn't be that harsh, but what can I say, we're in a free country they say, or world, and I can't be too harsh on condemned people, but don't you incite to violence or use the word hate...As for children, I should remember that I'm a proud Quebecker and I got to compete against some other country on the monster fucking baby making extravaganza to produce richness and entertainment and cannon food, and I must not forget love, ah! No need to, it's everywhere! I'm bathed in love! Got to find a job now, those rich and powerful live far older than me, and they need loads of money for those long years in luxury, never enough, and that includes a lot of politician, some will only carry the name a few years to get a lifelong pension and other advantages. And yes I'm jealous of the worth some people gave themselves through PMBBD but at least it's justified and pointed at the right target; sources of unfairness. Politicians are so power and money hungry they simply can't stop getting richer, ending up doing many of the most incredibly costly jobs, like becoming lawyers...I think I'm getting really crazy, I need a vacation.

Wrong people are being paid to be at places not for them while politicians get tired keeping votes count, voters with the same kind of attitude, the same kind of wishes. Do you choose the prettiest woman to be the captain of a ship? No! But that's the kind of situation we're living in the democracy-capitalism business, our historical brainwash and pressure selection "forces" us to choose "blind" captains who will always somewhat follow the initial direction of the ship with an innocent smile. He absolutely doesn't know where he's going except in the general direction learned at school, from some ancestor, and the learned advisors experts who know perfectly the ship's workings and how to dissuade the captain from doing anything that is risky for his status. He'll mostly choose the way of the ship, the fastest way, the easiest way, the straight ahead way. He has no use turning as everything is working. Besides, it would slow things down and need more energy accelerating back. So he gives an image of a man looking far ahead, not blind at all, he knows perfectly where he's going, a visionary watching a faraway wonderful land, a little nudge left or right to show change, leadership oblige. Once in a while he fires a machinist that made a mistake, replaces him by no better, then he encourages his crew and leave no doubt to his competence. If you challenge him directly he throws you overboard, only the likes of himself can take command, next cycle you'll vote for one, so no way out of it.

This may be a parody of what I mean, that nobody will change something about the unfair fundamentals of this reality, but many, and I weight my words, most politicians are dirty craps of the worst kind, there are millions of them, and they are not filling prisons at all, they're thriving, even multiplicating! TV is infested, vast political, psy and media mouth expanses are a plague as much as sex people and rich criminals, and together they form the superior population of the future. And you wouldn't imprison them, they have families, and their good side is hyped no end, and they have a throng of admiring followers ready to die for them or make a national funeral everywhere on TV! Anyway, you don't want these vampires as enemies, unknown and expensive vengeance may come back your way; means. Besides, vampires and serpent tongues are very popular with women, as long as you refrain from talking violent, or saying hateful things, a prerequisite to be a good manipulator that doesn't end-up in front of a psy....And don't make it small like I do, express yourself, while being careful not to express what you want to express if you're out of line, only express what those with the means want to hear. Maybe expressing through actions would be better than mouth entertainment, but if you don't do it the "right" way, you're guaranteed to end up in prison faster. As for non-talking mouth like mine, those don't even end up in prison.

Don't do anything violent! Unless you're into drugs. Or a murderer, murderers are nice for entertainment and to glorify the police and justice system, and the victims are always saints (who had nothing to do in hell I guess...), and it's good for the fear and paranoia factor of the selection, and the economy too, guns, dogs, cameras...But that's not what I'm talking about. Did I already explain the concept of reality condemnations? We cumulated quite a few of these, sorry "peaceful" protesters, we are condemned to selected expressions which will lead to the elimination of many intelligence options.

So while governments do the war on drugs thing, I want a war to unfairness; nobody has the right to be unfair where fairness can exist, unfairness should be a crime. Being rich while you see people in misery (rich is rich, not "middle or inferior class"), automatically makes you not only unfair, but evil too, and evil is meant to be battled, it is a fundamental high consciousness responsibility, and we are quite inefficient at it. And don't tell me people need rich show-offs everywhere around; they have been manipulated with PMBBD and hype to need it, that's totally different. Yes it has become a part of normality, and yes I want nice and pretty around, but the extremes we have today is a reflection of what the most ego want, and it is guaranteed that they want entertainment and an "inferior class" to admire them and desire their stuff.

This reality would sure need a bloody cleanup from top to bottom, but it's not me that is entitled to direct these energies, I wonder who... and it would be worthless in the long run, in big part because we are condemned to a leadership formulae and its associated population that is indoctrinated to its own religion, and they sure think they have the best system and do their best, anything else can only be evil and must be competed to death. And we are condemned by their police that protect them, they are dependent, and they got a lot of violent bums into drugs and murderers to run after. At the worst they have their armies to force you to their decision, if everything fails eventually, like if people suddenly couldn't bear PMBBD... They took the monopoly of violence after all, and don't you ever formulate a death wish, or write a phrase inciting to violence; electric chair? Hanging? Ah, lifelong incarceration sounds fun, death is too barbarous isn't it? At least we have a system to go to mars, the incarceration system...I personally prefer the old way, updated for today, where you'd lose all protection from the system; at least there would be some wild meat for those murderers who feel super powerful when they kill others...But it's not me that decides who can die in this reality, I wonder who? And I wouldn't trust the well adapted selection to decide since it got absolutely no judgment that makes sense in good and evil matters...Anyway, pain is different for very evolved, sensible and loving and all people, they prefer more twisted and displaced ways that lower civilization value as a whole instead of piercing the heart of the source. It's just that the end result of hypocrisy is often far worse than having a direct intervention, if just taking the reflection emphasis of truth to morph reality far faster toward good goals. No, no way out of it, people of today need hypocrisy, they need to be protected from the ugly, they must concentrate on the pretty, stay ignorant of evil behinds, or stay incapacitated of fighting evil, that's what they ask of their leaders, fairness in such matters, that way they are justified in front of god...No, violence is entertainment, murderers on TV all end-up caught by the police anyways. You must attack at the personal level, most of the selection need to be raped, or famished, or tortured, or having their children molested, or their economies stolen, or their house burned, then hate may (probably not) reappear out from under the debris of their soul (probably because that's how they've been taught to react in movies, or culture), that's the strength of their brainwash, worse, it has become a genetic property. Now, don't try that at home as it would still be worthless in the grand scheme of things, it was just to explain how people (always exceptions), once they are adapted to this reality (invested in it), are impossible to "recruit" in a fight against evil because they have unconsciously chosen evil and it would break the whole structure of their unconscious ways. Even in that scenario they would limit their hate at the vessel level, not going farther at the fundamental source because they can't.

Anyway, imagine the politicics of the world going nuts in war talking and international funerals preparations if people revolted, or just kidnapped a politician, just look at the October crisis... So forget these things, this reality is in too much troubles to sacrifice one's reputation to try something else, too late, condemned whatever you revolt, hell is hell, the only solution now is to select people one by one in line to find who has the attitude for another reality with different fundamental principles in a growing area with influences from ego reality controlled. That's the "easy" way out of all this I see, if not then what? Violence? And we'll need space and the cumulated knowledge and abilities gained by the experience of this reality, and if no plans are made to do so happens, then what? All-out war?

Action power and responsibility is somewhat proportional to controlled or possessed energy; the ones who act and make this reality are the ones controlling or possessing. It must be taken from where it is if we need to redirect any priority. But instead of having a smaller pay or losing a cent in a stash or losing a cent of profitability, the rich keep it all as it is, and if things cannot be "repaired" by the money of people somewhere in the bottom 3/4 of the pyramid, then money is printed, inflation increases, the debt too.

Control, the first path to this is the goal you visualize in youth versus how much you want to control of the reality (can be yourself, and you can see this as freedom in managing your or other people's time ), so you think in function of the money or fame as a way to adjust your life toward where or how you want it, and so the goal is always skewed as time advances because you can't go straight to it, you take detours, adjust your shit to fit. So if you don't have money, your actions will change to get some, a lot of which will up for the system, and the remaining is for "morphing" your little reality, your place, your car, as time advances, making you dependent.

Logic says it's supposed to be the rich that have the power to do or change things; they make the reality since they control and possess power. But even when we're in troubles the size of the effort to keep their selection out of troubles is more like the contrary; mostly proportional to the number of poorer people making more effort. But the systematization they made predicts all that, don't worry, it is "government's" money, taken from a stash that has that use, while bumming their population noneless.

That could apply to me, but my situation is in big part a conscious decision, so if I'm "inexpensive", "nonpolluting", it's my fault, I can't pass my time spending money, I don't need much production and exploitation, I don't get the economy turning super fast so I don't pollute much. I made my life so, in part as an investment, from believing it was worth it, to have nothing to lose spending time for it, which includes my own standard of living. For now, the way I see it, the longer I think about things before acting, the nearer the truth I should get, the more right in my actions I should be. Meaning I should believe in myself too, and since I may totally fail, I must be and stay at the bottom to have the biggest potential value at having the highest indispensability value toward life, and personal push (death) value toward historical possibilities and path. Evidently, those are mainly made and decided out of my own consciousness goals, my weight and my personal vision of things, my spirituality, and I don't have to be right in everything to have a good direction.

If you put a gun to my head, I'll close my eyes and live the last pain, the last steal of this reality I revolted against, I won't say a word, maybe I'll smile in peace, knowing I lived from a maximum number of good principles I could deduct. Do the same for an ego person now and watch him implore pardon, compassion, tolerance, anything, because they still have to profit from life, even if it's just eating, but for those living in luxury they know that that their only place is the reality that worked well with their mentality, it's their paradise... Even if they seek to soothe their consciousness by deciding where to invest some of "their" means on good actions, when it's not only for their image, they won't do it to because they can't see something better in their limited view of life. They'll spend the means on their priorities, to develop hell as a nice place to satisfy their every desires, create appropriate limitations in reality to control or imprison, or even force to extinction, minorities or systems or visions that are a true risk to their competition meant to bring them everything.

And the patchers are as responsible for the eternal pyramids as anybody else who encourages this reality, they are part of a whole and work in unison with it; if all the "do gooders" stopped, the system would crash. But everything is divided as causes, everybody divided as protest groups, every group wants something more important than the other, and godly governments choose what cause or sickness is best at getting limited money while the reality, along with all the politically blinded willful innocents to encourage it, sustains an eternal state of emergency, with media people to cultivate appropriate fears in a state of constant smiley happiness. So, who would want to crash the system? Surely not good people...

In a paradise for manipulators and profiteers, people like me must understand that they'll always have troubles getting basic respect, needs and competence; if I go to the hospital, my cost is very little in hospital cost, old people can be costly, it's normal, but the one that get the most benefits are the rich; hospitals exist mainly to heal well people with money; send a monarch in there and watch the thing get top service and competence, when they don't have their own expensive doctors and clinics, and that's where this reality invests most of its energy; the best manipulators and profiteers and their family hegemonies. And I'm not talking about hospitals to study things and specialized ones, and children ones where image people are more involved (around innocence). What I meant to say is that around 3/4 of what exists as costly, whatever in production, exploitation, pollution, or negative effects of all kind, serve unfair people, or people with an upside down kind of skewed vision of fairness... And you cannot change that because the situation is a condemnation; you can hardly feed the earth population, barely enough resource exploitation strength to sustain actual population, we need twice as much and we already exploited a damn lot in the last 50 years, and we're chocking life and us in pollution, so it means we cannot eliminate poverty, not only that, but we are dependent from it. You could have stupid ideas that cannot work in this reality, like increasing the standard of life of the bottom 1/3 of the pyramids, but just doing it for the bottom 1/10 would ruin everything, causing more troubles, we are condemned to many aberrations already.

Hell is a place of condemned people, mostly from PMBBD. There are always many things to turn your version of love to, as you ignore and twist what you hate, until you "love" it, then you'll hate it to vomit, then you'll "love" it again, the truth of such a weight of anything without direction you'll lose track of where you're going, until you understand how bad it is to twist and boost the signification of things, stuff minds and history with PMBBD. All users of PMBBD on masses should seriously consider suicide to stop their evil momentum, do it to help people gain better independent judgment from truth, since self-accepted evil civilizations built from bullshit get destroyed one way or the other from lack of massive judgment, in horror evil proportional. A big part of the life process within the galaxy is a work of judgment and responsibility interrelations, the universe exists in part to develop the best life and eliminate wrong developments, only the best can live forever, the rest fail on their home planet. Remember how I see the mind? Why fairness and truth is important?

Ego people inspire me for sure, and I'm doing heavy censorship, you're lucky I'm cleaning a bit my old ammo and removing some bent tips...I shouldn't say such things, you'll think I make a fixation; the truth is that everything inspires me, what do you think of that one? But battles are made with enemies, and I won't await their attacks passively. If I told you "do this!" what would you do? You'd ask why, then I must explain. This is my explanation, and walking along my explanation, to do thing at their best, I point at things in the palace and say this will crash on someone someday, that's why I believe we must do this; if I see a super hero defender of the rich moving from behind a bush, I'll transform him as a statue before he launches at me, turning around explaining what's the equipment, what's his problem, discovering some new stuff too, describing what he was planning to do, what his vision leads to, then I throw down his pants and carry on, the same for their women. That's what my frustrated and revolted side in reality sees as live ammo distribution in retarded motion, in my vision, since I don't necessarily need to be there to give effect. It passes or it breaks, the passing is done in my work, even if I could have tried for a guaranteed death at the first step, and don't think I'm not fighting; my whole life to date is a never ending battle.

Ego people don't really dream of having an evil planet, it's just what they'll unconsciously do from the result of transforming the pleasure system into the reward system without seeing all the interrelated factors that would affect life, if you wanted a justification; the no justification option is simply systemizing everything as a profiting competition for self-inflation. At the point where we are we have our evil planet, we'll just make it more evil along with anything else, so don't worry, we won't spread on another planet under this form, we'll soon be condemned to rot on earth until death, thus proving we developed as evil (failure). Just don't forget that evil is made of principles all related to life, life don't see us a devils, we are its pride, a reflection of all what it sensed through its history as facts, it lives our emotions, it reacts to our actions toward its goals and ways of working, it may even do the wrath of nature thing to wake you up, but if you fail it doesn't say you were evil, you just failed to take a good enough path; we humans are the ones with a babbling device, we are the ones applying words made of airwaves to tag things and actions, we are good or not good enough or bad or evil, and when we are developing as a failure we must have a dividing line of attitudes for self-judgment, we can't just say we're failures, we must say why. Evil is when we can do something good but do the contrary instead, and when you face the end (no potential) because you didn't do the good thing when you could, then there is no rewind, you were evil, you failed to develop your potential because of evil actions and attitudes; not because you were innocent, neither because you were wrong, since both things are temporary and reversible if you are good enough, but because you accepted evil, you accepted unfairness, you accepted to leave your judgment to a limited class of people thus incapacitating it globally, you accepted mass lies, you accepted the twisting of the most beautiful principles, you accepted profiting from innocence, you accepted illogicality or spiritual insanities, you didn't defend good, you didn't stand and take your human responsibilities, you were an accomplice of evil.

But since things are never that simple, you got to think that time is a big relative here, when you take a path you don't immediately reach the end of it, and for humanity, it is your descendants which will reach the end of it. So yes it is possible to be a bunch of evil innocents if the path was started thousands of years ago and people have been indoctrinated to believe it is a good or the best path or to defend it, or to be made dependent of it, but still it changes nothing to the fact that you were wrong, and everything is still a view of good and evil, what will lead to the end is evil, things like systemized unfairness, PMBBD on masses, filling history with lies, market everything in the name of the economy, etc. I know it's easier to say "who cares" or I'm exaggerating, but when there will be no more hope what will you say? These things can lead to such a result; in the face of global warming, if you condemn people to PMBBD modifying their judgment while forcing them to fearful peace in front of the police and army, to religious indoctrination, to the belief that they are living in the best system, to no value of judgment except to select a politicians, then the result can be that they'll never be able react in the best manner, particularly in the face of grave situations. So whatever way you look at it, global warming is connected to evil, and I could add a far longer list of direct negative effect which ego people controlling unfair means are responsible for; responsibility is proportional to means, don't think it is me that got the biggest effect on global warming, and don't think it is the rich that will die to stop it, exactly the contrary, and while I die out of it, they'll add more while singing pretty songs. And I didn't say we'll die out of global warming, I said "if", and to me the end without a human on earth is something I can't predict or deduct, what I see as the end is when we'll be condemned to earth without potential as a result of wrong attitudes seen as acceptable, when we'll have exhausted the capacities of mother earth at spreading high consciousness on other planets, when we'll have nothing else to do except peacefully rot on earth with our gadgets until we die, or huddle ourselves in religions, find comfort in the hope that god will debark and say evil doesn't exist.

However, some ways of life are, and will most likely stay, mysteries, whatever deductions I make. Yes the time I invested in making my view of good and evil makes it so that unfairness will always be a crime to me, and so I'll pass my time blasting the rich because I believe they mostly are criminals who should be removed from the laws system (your needs + salary (including the workforce and structures you condemn with your wellbeing) amount to more than 250 000$ a year? Then no system police or justice system for you, and no media to glorify you), but they could be a joke or a revolt or a way of life systems to pressure high consciousness by creating an impossible situation. They could be acting like they do from deep unconscious cues, their limitations, and those they are under, and those learned from the reality, not permitting them to find another path in their view of self-esteem. The UI is very fond of playing tricks on people thinking they found a truth about it, and that applies to me; truth is the most difficult quest of the universe, on purpose at it, and that's why whoever I meet is on the same level, I'm not into final truths, so I respect you all, innocents, and that's the façade I try to carry. But my writings are not my façade; it is a reaction from seeing and living hell on earth with my extraordinary capacities and the greatness of life and the universe, it is a respect thing, with my judgment fearing catastrophes coming from all kind of cumulated and pushed back sources, including such ridiculous things as people's vanity, and my belief that the ego-gods ideology is the fastest way to fail in the universe, or if you prefer, you'll always have too many systems of productions and development for the positive effect, exponential momentum gained from divergence from the ideal line of life and mind development (the more you work against life and the more you twist the mind into conflict the more counterproductive you get, whatever the form it takes, like unhappiness), accelerating entropy even if you build many things to counteract it; productivity toward noble goals becomes insignificant besides productivity toward self-satisfaction (not comfort, there is a difference between living comfortably and living in luxury or between having fun and spending insanely to make gods of entertainment) or proving who got the biggest bicep (war, nationalism, profiting competition etc). Another problem is that accidents always happen, intelligence displaces, and you can't control everything without losing enough profits that it ends-up not worth it, and the accidents that will successfully happen will be proportional to the success you'll have at unfairness and all the means used to keep it. So no way will I start competing to climb your pyramids, in fact, people with out of control egos (insane needs) are enemies of life and all life existed to get the contrary results, they're a mental problem in the species. Whatever they try to make us believe, whatever the effort they make at buying themselves a heart, whatever they sing butterflies, ego people, those who "confound" unfairness for fairness (quite an extreme confusion to me...like upside down kind of confuse), are among the less humane people on earth point, and that applies to many governments, not all, I do believe some got adequate intents, even if they're stuck with the system, or indoctrinated to it, it's just that in an ego reality most people running things (should be facilitating people's lives, instead of ruling or running, or managing the democracy-capitalism business) do it for the wrong reasons, for fame, reelection, pride, money, etc.

They say they'll increase the standard of living of the poor? They may be trying to provoke monetary instability or even a depression on purpose, and don't worry, it will be the fault of this service or that which is too expensive, for whom? People protesting for a better standard of living can be a perfect opportunity to dump their responsibility, where it should always end-up. You can't stop poverty presently, too many people, too many rich, wrong mentality. You can't take the money off the hands of the rich to put it in those of the poor since the system would adjust itself so the money still end-up stashed for a few people, because their attitude is interdependent with the attitude of the poor, one profit from the other senseless, while the other refuse to stand for nothing no more under the pile of PMBBD, or cheated too much for too long, the good of humanity has become a lost cause. And to still add more, the money is used on a fantastic inefficient batch of wrong retarded priorities and structures, which are pushed with PMBBD as critical to the life of people by the media. The truth of this reality is that there will always be a vast slab of the population poor to the bones or suicided from dependences, another vast slab very frustrated, another slab self-inflated, and a batch of rich beyond measure, and you better work hard if you don't want to end-up very low. This will persist until hope is lost.

Shut-up we're in monetary troubles, thank to you, everything wrong is your fault, get a job or work harder, spend, get the economy or system to grow more and only through the politician you voted for will you have a word to say about things. The worst is that they say it themselves that they're an "institution", and that they must protect the democratic "institution"! In fact, the institution, even if it is sometimes run by good believers, is a tool to condemn people to an unfair profiting mentality. They can do anything for that, building palaces, build the island world or Las Vegas and live in many vast luxury houses while moralizing you to control your electricity consumption, but they cannot end poverty or unfairness, they're dependent from it, the whole reality is.

So while we're categorized by those politicians as "lower" class, or "middle" class while they're "higher" class, for the lower part of the pyramid there is always a justification for not getting your due, only a minority ends-up getting it, the rest don't have enough of a lifetime not to be a victim of the manipulative and unstable monetary system, and the responsibility always ends up where? Surely somewhere around the contrary place where it should be...When everything craps out, who will be the culprit be? Surely not interest rate stashers...It's a wonder this economic system is not failing more often and totally than this.

No way out of this "hell" without changing the exaggerated superiority mentality (you do need superiors, more like leaders, for many things in life particularly before 18, but that's proportional to many other factors, it's the exaggeration and the profitability mentality that is terribly negative to many people, like division and competition to gain the top position in everything, separating everything into small parts that can compete against each other.

We have dehumanized and separated all life associated things for profitability and now they are separated things for scientists, experts and financiers. We have disassembled the human "ecosystem" and we have caused and wanted the atrophy of necessary parts that didn't work well in the competition philosophy and now humanity has got cancer. Parts of humanity will have to be rebuilt from healthy cells to skip debilitating limitations, and it will have to work as a whole living thing, we'll have to order things the right way without nations competing against each other for superiority.

The result of all this competition is the filling the earth with a completely unrealistic amount of people, and the quantity of people on earth has a direct influence on how we feel, how we perceive our value. Living like insects on a piece of shit, however intelligent we are, doesn't have a good effect for the mind, I could even say it increases the tendency to seek hive mentality, if the pressure selection encourage the style too much, we could even end-up in a thousand years with women bossing and raising men as tools, in a materialistic world, since they are better suited to keep the last frontier standing before people realize how deep in trouble they are; appearance. We're lucky we'll be a failure before then, and we are not in a reality where "looking good" is the main trait of governance, so no problem, but we're headed to no better where popularity is becoming the main trait of people supposedly representing the population, aren't "super" "stars" the most publicized people after politicians on T.V.? Isn't it strange that the bosses of the Democratic business are totally not like the people they supposedly represent? Or am I wrong? As for the hive reality, we're not far from that if you look at the end result, I mentioned women because they're the ones to give birth, and they're the ones from which we're supposed to learn to control our ego the most, but most don't care about that anymore.

And control of one's ego has nothing to do with severity, strictness or coldness. It has everything to do with love, understanding, compassion, care etc. and believe it or not, such positive attributes are supposed to be associated with money; money can be and is supposed to be the profoundest expression of appreciation, belief, trust, need, it is a heart thing, a life thing, a blood thing. The final goal of buying something or having a service is to end up saying that you're happy of how some people spend their life time, energy and skills. This is the good way of money; it says "I'm thanking you 121.25 times, for all the people involved in making this thing reality." or "I'll lift 121.25 boxes for you so much I like what you did" It's just that I don't like to thank people who take unfairly or cause a conflict with my responsibilities.

There is still tons of people with an attitude I like, people with potential, I can easily see true emotions, sensitivity to things, there are scars and heroes, and the broken parts mostly come from manipulators and their bullshit. I would have liked to say that those people I can appreciate could do something, but I can't because they are the most deceived, at least when I try to understand their lives. A lot of people are living in a continual environment of never ending deception and I don't want to add to that, it's just a shame that people embark in any competition to win something a never ending fight to scratch self-esteem where there is nothing left except feelings where everything marketed, and survival money is not supposed to bring self-esteem in a supposedly advanced society... My revolt is where the means are, in the hands of the deceivers, the ones that can and must do something.

But isn't everything interdependent? Nobody will do something if its interdependent part doesn't do something, status quo in the name of peace, and it's all a lifelong process which ends-up with people too dependent of and from their brainwash to change or act differently, or they cumulated too much stuff or invested too much of their live. The same for a big slab of the youth that we grows with the perfect unconsciously rebellious attitude that will make them a perfect fit for competition later, since this reality respond to any pressure with more PMBBD and people have no choice to choose a path through it one way or the other. And the tendency is for the government to encourage people building infrastructures of PMBBD and encouraging entertainment to contain it (like vampire movies). The goal is to condemn people younger and younger.

There are more and more adolescents fucking with adults, taking drugs, being exploited, forming control gangs, even killing. And guess what? They're a bigger and bigger part of the economy, car companies are making of adolescents the target of new designs to sell more cars, you see them everywhere in publicity, pub and fashion companies are craving for adolescent. And adolescents are more easily manipulated from their will of change and drive to explore, by politicians profiteers that never end singing great changes that will make things better, change that have become an argument for any profiteer, something that bring vast profitability to multinationals helping the economy.

Young people are a proud source of an increase in production all over the planet, particularly of gadgetry which pollute like crazy, whatever a scientist was paid to apply a green sticker, recycling the only argument, restaurants like a life quest while being oblivious to all those people starving around the world except on their social media places, taking the example of the rich, so they want more and they need more and the sky's the limit! And you think this is the mentality necessary to make things fair? Everybody is supposed to be a millionaire these days, let's confound stupidity with innocence and let any action we do take the form of experience gaining and life exploring, even if stupidities and mistakes are the worst way to gain experience or to learn. Today's models are porn "stars", "super" "stars", politicians, businessmen, and professional sportsmen, not much parents, which anyway are very rarely an example of the success of love.

My way to experience is not much of an example either, someone without much of an education, not much sexual experience, the same for work experience and pleasure experience, not much internet too, all in all, I have almost no experience of this reality. Some people may even say I know nothing of life, yet, you can't deny that I'm learning something from my experience, is introspection that much of a revelation? Or is it that I don't seek to adapt to what I don't like? Don't forget how life works, the lower you go the lower you can be, if you want to force life to a better standard you'll need to refuse lower standard. The same for human interaction, if you don't want to be profited on this aspect or that, then you got to show it doesn't work, because there will always be some to pressure others for different reasons. As for me, the way to see it is that I've taken the challenge so hard that I broke my brains, I used another function of my brain to break my unconscious drive that was in part a genetic reinforcement of this reality as much as a youth development from experiencing reality around me. It's like becoming a retard to go back to fundamentals, while reality became a subject of study. I would say the result can sometimes look like PTSD, but I see it more like being alone in the dark, and this is really how I often feel, but that gets better as I paint my reality upon this darkness, artistic strokes of psychotism, some schizophrenia here and there, some paranoid stuff, some testosterone, some megalomania, add some sociopathy and a touch of weird et voila the recipe of perfection! I'm joking, genius? That sounds worse in the self-inflated field of things, you'll probably prefer to replace the confusion with psychopathy, supposing I manage to keep things under control, but that shouldn't be a problem, supposing I manage to develop my consciousness in a good manner, but that shouldn't be a problem, supposing I manage to keep a high level of empathy, but that shouldn't be a problem, supposing I manage to see things through the eyes of enough aspects of life or entities...That's a bit simplified and not super right but that's the spirit. So I shall smile humbly at the attacks to my mentality, knowing nobody is in a position to understand the extraordinary thing I do with myself, let alone judge me. The thing I know is that this tear between me and reality that arose from my revolt is the main cause of most of my special effects (or their worsening, I still need the adequate genetics, remember?), and probably these effects may be related to specific spheres of interests or attitudes I developed from hating this reality, in fact, there are subjects that are extremely difficult because they are easier to lose control over, particularly at the extreme I push things, and then I need to adjust to find the line I consider I should walk, and this line got terror both sides... In this theory, my special effects are meant to disappear proportionally to the peace level I'll manage as I adapt myself back to reality. This invalidates the whole psy vision of things, because by revealing what I hold at heart and what pisses me off at the bottom of my "soul" I became mentally sick, and the worst is that I saw it happen, and I let it happen, ugly stuff that comes with the job, necessary to express what lays beyond me; let's say I touched life, and to survive I must show that I was worth it. I have known for a long time that to succeed in my quest I'd have to take control of these aspects of my developing personality as I make everything coincide to equilibrium. Think about that a second, everybody thinks he's into power, but I tell you when you pass through my life style and reach this point you're beyond the word power and into transcendence, all is left of power is care. So while I'm hard with people, just know that the greatest victim of my fight is me, as I look at myself, as I'm one with life, and know the sacrifice which includes my recipe as I existed to succeed, as it should be, as it had to be, at this moment of history. Each new revision of myself brings me so much revelation it's a mutation, but now I know that my quest was as much in me as in my writings about reality, it was all a matter of making the tools to become one with everything, even my rejection of this reality will become an adaptation of my thinking, even my hate and revolt, it was all meant to end because I'm one with life. But for now I still need all the weird I can muster, and I sure won't remove good and evil psycho stuff from my work to sound saner. In the end I'll stand in readiness, probably laziness too, a lone cell on this planet of would be gods, an extraordinary invention that everybody is guaranteed to misjudge, a guy at peace, with nothing to prove and nobody to impress, maybe with surprise reactions and special visions. I don't know what will happen of me, but I'll leave behind a little something which includes myself, but not as a recipe, because the recipe of my recipe is not meant to be duplicated, and it is variable in function of time and place and many other factors.

I could say that being forced to a reality all life long will always cause problems to people, and this will be exacerbated by the complexity of the system made to control people. Whatever you do, if people at some point come to see the reality as wrong, or unfair or full of cheaters, or as a competition against ourselves to live comfortably, if people feel they don't control their life, then you're in troubles one way or the other. And I'm talking unconsciously here, and this revelation can come at 2 years old. All that to say that preventing people from forming an idea of the reality they live in before they are condemned is an evil way of doing things, in fact 75% of the complexity of this system is meant to manipulate and profit from people, and a good reality can do with the hassle, that way people know a lot earlier that they can spend their energy freely in the reality. Personally, I decided to have a good idea of the reality I live in before deciding to implement myself in it, and my conclusion is that if I had to become crazy, and if I reaped hostility or fear or whatever supplementary problems, it's because I had hell in front of me.

The sooner you implement yourself in something or a mentality, the more dependent of it you become and the less possibility and willpower you'll have to quit it or change it or yourself for that matter. This have been known for a long time, and voting changes nothing to this. People must jump in the boat fast and thinking is for school, so they'll never have a chance to be free in their minds, only in a fun way or through PMBBD concepts. So don't think about it and jump in the boat people, have fun, get a job, make babies, watch television, let big daddy play god and take care of things.

You may think I'm a hot or a hard head,( I don't know which one means what), because I judge people or decide my own life, but isn't this my life? And what about my judgment? Who cares? The great god of judgment? The judge? And who name judges?

Understand that I'm absolutely not against laws or order or rule, quite the contrary, I just don't accept any rules blindly, particularly if they come from people who follow the rules of the book to the letter, except for their evils...And I absolutely bow to global judgment rules or laws but the problem here is that I consider global judgment to have an infinitesimal value, and this is wanted, to keep people condemned, to keep an unfair system in place, the democracy capitalism religion that you interpret to fit.

Humanity's judgment is in fact atrophied to a fraction of what it should be with the help from vast quantities of PMBBD implemented intellectually and culturally, with the help of television, publicists, movies, psy and scientists, all kind of opportunists seeking cracks for manipulation and profiting, we're in a free country, without mentioning the pressure of an overload of the most diverse big guns, from pistols to satellites passing by the plane carrier.

The jury example may be a small clue as to how to have a good judgment on something, but for the rare times it is used in this reality, it is used like a democratic campaign; both sides try to manipulate the jury which can only choose between two options; then the judge or law decides the sentence. and just like democracy, it is mostly an expensive façade because the judge deciding if a cause is worth to go before a jury, already knows in a vast majority of cases, if the guy has done the specified evils. And yes a lot of evil get punished, (PMBBD make some evident and a lot of actions are evidently evil), but nobody is supposed to control the judgment of someone else without his input, particularly through PMBBD, and that applies to laws and budgets.

Judgment should be provided by the whole quantity of people concerned by the subject and willing to judge and decide. A gang, however big, pretty, structured or accepted it is, does not contain all the people concerned (unless it does). This means that what is systemized as laws in this reality is invalid, even if a lot is good and necessary for a minimum of order, while understanding that our options for a way of gaining judgment are limited. So no I definitively don't think we're in the worst system, I'd say it's half competent, and I prefer order to anarchy, and democracy to dictatorship, but we are at a turning point, vote the form of our future!

To have valid laws to control someone you need the judgment of everybody concerned and willing to be concerned. But don't think it means billions of people (to prove it's impossible), it means a representative mass of the different mentality groups forming those concerned, let's say age groups for simplicity. So the fundamental is not that much complicated, in fact, this form of judgment activity could have started as soon as humanity learned to read in majority, but we're always a momentum from the past, a history cumulating condemnations in the name of security and the protection of richness accessibility systems.

I understand that when humanity didn't know how to read, the only and right thing to do was to put your faith in your superiors and you had no choice, one way or the other, to bow to people who possessed better judgment and knowledge. But this epoch ended long ago with the globalization of reading and writing. It didn't happen because of old momentum and the powerful of the time took control of writing and there is always somebody who wants to tower above others. Dreaming about being gods (superior) kept popping them all over the place, and with the help of their brainwashed or subjugated followers under the comparative influence of how money inflates one's image, the philosophy of ego competition became permanent, with its associated spirituality that gave birth to shielding, fitting and reinforcing religions where everything comes from man, until the whole reality takes the form of a fundamental ideology, let's say the winner for competition. And so we took the means and found the justification for supreme unfairness, automatically twisting the most fundamental view of good and evil, disconnecting it from life to reformulate it as laws and commandments, we made of everything a superiority quest, even of one sex over the other, marketed everything to step by step bring it to the top. And today, they got all good principles in their pockets too, everything is twisted to defend and justify the persistence of an old order of things that should have been replaced thousands of years ago. In fact we are becoming a selected and limited extension of it from continual pressure, only the form evolved from new comfort, tech, entertainment, dependences etc.

I'll refrain from saying that people should have the right to do anything they want, just because I better like order and I prefer to select the best option available, but not only your law will remain invalid in my mind (not only because they have become a handicap to human evolution, but because they were not a reflection of adequate judgment too), but I'm not strong on your vision of good and evil too, which includes your law system, since everything is a matter of good and evil...I could even say that no actual laws are valid in an evil reality (fundamentally unfair where we have the ability to make things fair, cause massive life suffering while we have the abilities to care, etc), all imposed by this gang or that, whatever they took a tool to make a system where they can boast themselves a reflection of the mass. But yes they are right, good and evil it doesn't exist in hell! Are you happy? There's law though, and punishment, just so people like me behave...And don't suicide, it's illegal, your ass belongs to me, I'm sure there's a way to make a profit, and suicide is bad for presidency! At the worst go to the psy and pharmaceutical industry, they need your depression, fast food restaurants need your fat, the beauty industry need your ugliness, even incarceration is a business nowadays!

And your liberty statue judgment shit is just liberty to competition all aspects of life for profits, anarchy liberty controlled by ego people and gangs with PMBBD and guns to enforce their ways, while good and order stand to preserve appearances. I'm into something here, ego reality as the true anarchy, as the development of anarchy after 3000 years, and gangs or "gods" competing for control of divided people are a part of an anarchy...

So go right ahead, do what you want, that's what I'm doing, you have the right to ignore any law that has been made without the judgment of the concerned people, and I will have this opinion until the people have this right (surely not through actual opinion pools), oh, and one big point; remove your selection from the equation, it's like asking religious people to vote for someone else than Jesus or Moses, the green party won't succeed that way... But that will probably be a thousand years of hard work and adjustments to start finding the best equilibrium or way in most things, and quite a fantastic revolution to accomplish, while the powerful of this reality will have to be removed from influencing judgment activity. Knowing how much willpower, energy and choices are left to us, we may as well lower our arms and let our judgment in the hands of our superiors, let the system control and exploit us to the end, I guess at some point you get justified to just embark and dream of winning at lotto...

There are many situations where you're better leaving your judgment in the hands of someone else, evidently, but the more you practice your judgment in many spheres the better it will become and the better the mind too. Generally, judgment activity should be proportional to the number of people concerned, without manipulation to reach a conclusion. Another factor is available time, it should be proportional to the importance of the decision (people affected by it) with some exceptions, you may use global judgment to decide to go battling an enemy but once under a rain of bombs, you better have an authority figure or leadership to give fast orders unless it all ends in "chaos"...It is evident that time is very limited in an environment of competition to be the first to jump on any opportunity, but that doesn't applies when profits are not involved, so people always find tons of time to postpone spendings that don't take the form of an investment.

You need many things to have an adequate learning environment, most of which take the form of pressures to perform at a certain standard. Once you reach that, external pressures should recede, unless there is new knowledge or example to follow. The process of control for imposition should be proportional to consciousness ability, but it can be seen as a failsafe as long as you got the capacities to understand the subject. What I meant to say is that external control or pressure for "brainwash" can be represented by a lowering curve intersecting the rising curve of independence while contributing to it. It means pressure can be used to gain knowledge which in turn lead to more independence which in turn requires less pressures or control, if things are done well. This is valid for a whole life as it is for some facets of it. The goal is supposed to be to have independent people that do a maximum of actions by themselves using their judgment while following a bottom line that is decided by all concerned. It also means that at some point you should be able to question the bottom line if you want, unless you made it too complex, and that applies to the justice system and its laws. Control to bring that to people is good, under that form, and it is in harmony and equilibrium with how people are. If you can't question or make sense of the reality you live in while you got normal mind capacities, or if it made itself in a way that it's not worth it, or worse, almost an impossibility, then what can I say, it's a proof that you're in hell?

You're not supposed to follow orders all your life without questioning or without being a part of changes, and if the bottom line and justice system is so complex that people concerned don't want to understand, or if PMBBD disables too much judgment capacity, or if people feel cheated, then you need to change things. The reality makes me and I make the reality. Life is a wheel, you can't just adapt, you got to know why you should adapt and to what you are ready to adapt to, you got to know what you want, and you got thinking to do. Not doing it means that either life has lost much value for you or your mind is limited. Next, I may decide to let someone that got better judgment than me in some areas, take control of me depending on the situation. That is mostly valid in a personal or work environment, but you're not supposed to have most of the aspects of your life manipulated or under pressure for control, or is it profits?

This reality permits, among other things, responsibility manipulation proportional to means, but if possible, it will eliminate the responsibility for bad effects altogether, why not? If everything craps out it was the fault of god after all, and Nostradamus and the Mayans and the bible all said things would crap out in the end, whatever we do, so nobody's responsible for shit. Psy are good at that too, and people not born too. As a result, it is mostly the inferior, poorer, younger, and people not born who end-up responsible for other's actions, since it seems our actions do affect reality after all...It's just that we'll refuse to consider that we may be wrong about what actions are most valuable in our trophies distribution algorithms... Who has the responsibility of killing? The low soldier. Who have the responsibility of moving things? The young. Who will be responsible for cleaning pollution, changing attitude, paying the debt? the poor, the young, and people not born. Most of the time, responsibility of bad effects is totally discarded by the most responsible, and not only that, evil have a tendency to ignore it, like a lot of other principles of good...

Sorry, but the one manipulating history or people using PMBBD, or those who took the means, they have far more responsibility than the one under the effect of their attitude. Furthermore, responsibility cannot disappear, neither be diluted, it's like saying cause to effect is not important to knowledge. So whatever you discard responsibility the effects of being a hypocrite manipulator still end-up affecting reality, evidently, when the effect is good or pretty, you can bet the responsible is pointing at himself, there may even be a competition of who's the most responsible! The other aspect is that the way to reach an effect on reality is influential in the end result of where responsibility end-up; if you steal all the money and pay people to build a bridge with it, then you don't reap in the glory since you stole the money and condemned people to do your bidding to get it back. The same applies to the PMBBD scheme you are under. So really, don't try to twist evil into good, you only get troubles, well, I mean in the deeper aspect of thing... In a situation where the means are fair and nobody is under PMBBD influence, then authority is responsible proportional to the fairness scenario it is under, the same for the one following authority, for the positive as much as the negative, because we're a team.

I think the point that really pisses me off is that is that most people have to work and encourage this reality because they would hardly survive otherwise, or they wouldn't have a decent standard of living, and all these things that need our money, the deal we make with the devil to take now and pay later, so sure we'll be useful to him to the end of our life, all a trick where everything develops as a paranoia about money, gains, dreaming of winning at lotto to feel safe or that we mean something, and I'm not talking about the needs to feel indispensable to someone or something, which is normal, but let's say this will never take its best form if competition is one of the main tool to gain value in a reward system. The question is, are people responsible if the ways of the reality forces them to develop problematic attitudes as critical to their life? I guess so, because responsibility is a matter of actions and effects, and even if the actions were perpetrated by ancestors and the effect is seen today, the result is that the ancestor is responsible because he took the action and he was a person. Evidently, in the situation where said ancestors created hell, then those who persist on being part of it reap a bit of responsibility because they still act toward the same effect, but the nice part is that now that you're in hell, it's full of opportunities to reap in the positive of actions that would make things truly better! Evidently, people are not responsible for the laws of the universe they are under, and its random parameters.

All that is just when you meet god, down here on earth things are very foggy because of all the bullshit, so you're better seeing responsibility as an ideal, probably 10% of all responsibility ends-up at the right place in the right quantity, and we're lucky it doesn't end-up on the trade market, and don't laugh, just think about it, all what can be traded is full of the responsibility stuff, it is the result of actions.

People try to take responsibility for the things that they want responsibility in, if they can, and they try not to be responsible for the rest of their actions, but while I would call this a normal behavior, the fact remains that it prevent people from having a true opinion or judgment of themselves, completely messing-up the actions they should do to turn around the best version of themselves as they grow-up. And I'm not talking about the effect to their value toward good and evil. I understand that these things are a bit complicated to deal with, but don't think people don't know, it's hard to cheat life...It's just that this reality is a result of a competitive mentality with responsibility too, there's a problem with priorities too, what we value most too, our view of good and evil, and more, let's just say things are too complicated in hell, and meant to be so to skew the ideal scenario of everything into the scenario people condemned themselves too. So don't worry everything is gonna be allright.

There's a relation with independence too, being dependent can reduce responsibility, we're all in this together, but at the same time we must remain independent in chosen facets of our lives, so we feel unique; everybody wants to be the ant queen of the hive, and for as long as you're not a genetic reflection of your unconscious ideal, you'll need to feel independent, but someday there won't be no hope no more and you won't care, but you'll still bear responsibility. We're already doing this, a lot of people limit their mind because they don't want to question expertise; too complicated, not their responsibility, let well institutionalized experts on television do it like evolution. They already have too much self-investment, dependent of a way of living they'll encourage with all their lives because it is implanted from long ago and still pushed to this day. The same for the truth of the reality people live in, willful ignorance or ego innocence is real bad, life works from its senses reporting truth, it doesn't mean you have to live horror or look at it, or unfairness, it means knowing, caring and living emotions from being revolted, and being careful of what you glorify or demonize, appreciate or ignore. A lot of these mind limitations arise from cultivating fears. Someday most people won't have a use for a brain, intelligence will be entertainment, or it will make you crazy, not normal.

So don't question the fundamentals, and follow the law, we're not far from automatism, then clones, when we'll have exploited all the imagination humanity can provide we'll be ready for standard genetics, to fill the exact work requirements of all aspects of our system, which includes the surface look of our definition of everything perfect...It will be like wow! Color, happiness and pride aplenty, in our ant society, any risk repelled virulently, time for the meteor, a shame really...

Obeying orders imposed by laws, given by ancestry, by the structure of the system, by panoply of different control or manipulation gangs have almost become a genetic thing, and with the family dynasties ego gods continually dream about and create, I'd be scared that we'll eventually truly have genetic classes.

It's a good thing there is no way to value people from bad to good for their responsibilities in all the different effects their actions have on everything, it would expose how deep in PMBBD they are, and probably most of earth population would make a depression. Or the responsibility they gave themselves versus the responsibility they have toward life, or whatever else you may think of that is part of being human, these responsibilities people took, the ones they should and the ones they could take, proportional to means taken...

Now, where has our independent willpower gone to? Another thing that happens when you become dependent of a system is that everybody from top to bottom gets their willpower controlled or canalized by someone or something else. Everybody become slaves to some authority or system, and acting independently becomes far more difficult and creates tons of conflicts. You trade your willpower, your energy, your independence, for stability, for comfort for not taking some of your responsibilities and then you depress over your loss of human value while admiring top "gods" to whom you give an exaggerated value, to worsen your situation. Once you have your physical or mental energy invested in your adaptation, all is left of your independence is your immediate vicinity where you can displace frustration and confound independence with dress diversity and a pot of superficial philosophies that can make you happy, a lifelong bullshit wisdom competition to feel better than the people near you, as you carry your brick to reinforce your condemnation to the source of your limitations.

There is this definition that willpower is the capacity to avoid short term temptation to reach long term goals, that's the kind of cute bullshit that could get tons of likes as a facebook meme, we're lucky it's not a glorified guy that said that...I guess the goal here is to disconnect willpower from life energy, so that you don't feel cheated, because what does temptation has to do here? No temptation nothing! Or robots. It's all a matter of dosage, resisting temptation, what temptation? The temptation not to die? Sounds like a very wrong kind of measure to make your scientific study methodological, a measure of your temptation not to die, seriously, temptation can be anything of any relative strength dependent from anything, but yes, robots are devoid of temptation and they work no end without complaint, but life is different, it get pissed off, or depressive, so fuck your dream of an ant society, the truth is that willpower is simply the mental strength to act, or the motivation you need to act.

Self-valorization and money are a logical source of willpower, even if you can twist these things upside down or ignore their best ways, but never underestimate true love and understanding. We should not confound willpower and the global energy it will make us spend, and seeking money which will mainly make us spend more energy toward ego needs. In reality, it makes almost no difference; they can both extenuate you to death, but the difference is there; love will make you do unbelievable things that only a monstrous amount of money will hardly get you moving to do, unless the reality is too crappy, and creepy he too. You know the expression "Living from love and fresh water"? That doesn't get the economy turning much, and it goes against the rich's intensive PMBBD to make love a trade market thing with the help of scientists and psy to make it a hormonal animal thing, or is it a DNA thing? Or is it a nervous thing? And humorist at it to make it a laughable thing...

So our willpower is mostly used to fuel the machine and keep it running, our transformed life energy (money) then enters a gigantic wheel of different ego satisfaction gears, delimited by size and position. The vast majority of it is lost to the inefficiency of the system, like a gigantic multi-level transmission gearing that eats almost all the power of the motor, while the old motor is continually repaired and losing always more oil in toxic fumes. The efficiency is composed of truly good goals like happiness (not in an ever growing ego sense), good food, science, medicine, technology, long lasting health, space etc. Just don't forget you can easily transform good goals to inefficiency or even squarely eliminate their positive attributes through PMBBD, like the creation of needs for cars with pub, or pharmaceuticals consummation overload, or invincible food that spread in the wind, or short lived gadgetry. There are many things that started the right way to end-up half wrong or inefficient from monetary pressures.

To get back to my things, or to make things still more complex, you got to take into consideration innocence when thinking responsibility; there are no argument good enough to discharge yourself of your bad effects except innocence. The one profiting from or manipulating innocence, which includes pressures and systems that limit access to knowledge, takes proportional responsibility for their limiting effects. Innocence is a relative and hard to gauge thing, but concerning youth we have to set general "around" parameters in which a vast majority of people are supposed to be included, that's one reason why there are age categories; a baby is not an adult, but if we follow the logic of this reality, someday babies are going to be considered adults as soon as they start talking because even a baby can be unfairly rich these days, like it makes sense, all you need for some to put pressure for profiting is a hint of consciousness.

I'm exaggerating, a little, but if they could make us believe sex is important for babies, they'd do erotic pub with hot babies falling in love guaranteed, but nothing to do with profiting from innocence they'd say, and the scientific methodology was perfect. One big part of losing innocence and becoming more of an adult is understanding the fundamentals of the civilization and gaining a certain level of human knowledge and development. Academic and scientific knowledge will hardly make you more of an adult if taken alone, particularly if it has no actual uses, the same for partying around. A big part of what makes an adult is the time you invest alone judging everything you learn, the control you have over yourself to skip having a negative effect or influence on others, the actions you make having true potential to make your environment better.

Presently, everything is arranged from the whole history of adjustments so your loss of innocence is controlled in such a way as to be separated into spheres of subjects everywhere for competition. This permits responsibility to be separated to pieces and thrown on the back of someone else and so on and on until it reaches the bottom, where innocence is almost cultivated through PMBBD and finally on the shoulders of people not born, where innocence is infinite.

Yet, at around 15 people are supposed to have the consciousness that a good amount of justification is necessary to inflict pain or death to others and so, if they do it, they will be responsible for it, whatever the ways of the reality they live in. That makes the one doing the killing responsible and, if an order was given, the one that gave it is more responsible. That doesn't mean killing is bad, it means someone is responsible, no? I even sometimes go to the extent of asking myself if I'm skipping my responsibility by not doing thing manual, a bit, but I found myself sufficient other responsibilities to skip that one.

If someone dies in a war, responsibility is not split between everybody, responsibility is spread proportionally to place on the "chain" of command that accepted and transmitted the order to kill. People take appropriate responsibility of their status or powers. You can't even sign a contract to discard it because transformation of people as killing tools is not my style. Supposing the soldier got the intelligence to know that killing is killing, then you could say the variables here are the willingness of the soldier to develop an opinion on such matters versus the pressures (PMBBD) intensity to get (legalize) his ass doing it.

In a pyramid (for simplicity) of command the responsibility grows as you look higher; the higher you go, the more value is given to the kill, until you reach the president that is 90% responsible. Within the attack window leading to the death of the victim, the president was so quick that he had time to give 90 knife hits while the remaining attackers had time to give 10.

If the president tells you you're dead, I bet you'll be scared, but maybe you could kick a soldier or 2 in his army, meaning the same threat coming from a lowlife won't scare 90% of you. It's just to make you understand the principle, because everything is a lot more mixed-up than that. Yet, that's the most absolute idiocy someone could imagine, it totally jam the reality of things, you cannot accept that your leadership structure take such a responsibility, and they absolutely don't take it, it disappear because they are "not there" as a shut-up argument, and the only one learning something and truly taking its responsibility is the lowest, least paid human of the batch and doing the biggest amount of work; the soldier. And not only that, people will point fingers at him, yes sir, twisted upside down like that, and the president will go back to his luxury home in a limousine, maybe with a blame, but surely not a list of dead he's responsible at 90%...

Now, I didn't say killing was evil, when there is a killing there is at least one in the two attacking the other, one right one wrong in the ideal extreme scenario or life and death, and people are supposed to feel good eliminating wrongs or persistent evil, and boast responsibility for it, but it's a question of judgment too, which creates justifications. There are responsibilities and there are justifications. There are excellent justifications to kill tons of people, and if your justifications are good toward life's advancement, like fighting evil or gaining more fairness, then you'll be good doing it, it will weight a lot in your good side. So, as I already said, don't think you're evil too fast, people kill, evil got a big head-start at that, for many reasons, but death is the bottom line of where you can go to get your point across, and evil will get the last word if you are not ready to fight on that line too. For now it looks like we punish contrary to responsibility in this reality, and you're lucky when the worst criminals don't end-up in luxury.

On another facet, exchanging and transferring responsibility have critical civilization advancement uses, expertise or trade (jobs) involve strong transfers of responsibility. Globally, the best scenario of responsibility sharing or displacement is a decision is taken by everybody concerned. Many hard to take responsibilities can be taken at their right place this way. That's why I'll add that responsibility is closely related to indispensability.

As you can see, responsibility is another subject that is hard to judge, but you got enough of a vision here to understand that there's a relation with means, and while personal responsibility in things may need a tribunal so complex it can become, it is entirely possible to make a system that got far more responsibility accuracy, in fact a good system shouldn't even care about responsibility (non-personal) since the logic of the system should do the job by itself. Right now though, this reality doesn't follow the strict minimal principle making sense about responsibility, again except in forced situation, or situations that end-up in front of judges. That's why nobody can take many responsibilities concerning top jobs, and they don't. And that's another reason why the democracy-capitalism business is not a good system; it imposes disproportionate responsibilities to some people, whatever these responsibilities are redirected or discarded. I'm talking responsibilities in bad effects evidently, which brings me to the other skewed aspect of this; the emphasis of positive versus negative responsibility taking is disproportionate too. So in the end, it doesn't make sense so much that it's a simple competition.

The missing element here is that people should have a word to say directly, and I said directly, DIRECTLY, with proven numbers, in any decision concerning them. And that applies to everything in the ideal scenario, particularly a budget in a system, that way people are capable of taking their responsibilities; no responsibility is too big, in a sense the means and the control is truly in the hands of the adequate people, not a selected bunch that will manipulate things toward this agenda or that where friends are. And you can bet the current use even form of democracy id inadequate for that, it's like democratically choosing a pope to run Catholicism, but does a pope represent my opinions? Maybe in the matter of taking money here instead of there but beyond that absolutely not, I'll never have a word to say about the fundamentals, and if I do, it will be because they are in an invincible state so much my opinion has become laughable. So he represent the opinion of the like of himself and he'll do anything, use any PMBBD to make a selection that fit with his mentality until the end; the same for the bosses of the Democracy-Capitalism business, and you can bet people with a mentality like mine will never be taken seriously, and we're so advanced final at that that we're at the step of advanced prevention; where religions got lakes of fire and daemons awaiting those against its vision, this system got psychopathy and narcissism awaiting those against its vision...

To be a good guy you have to be responsible proportional to means, positive as much as negative, and some have such a mountain of means that the notion is ridiculous. A leader cannot take the good of it while discarding the bad, if you do that your brain doesn't work in its right manner, something got twisted along the way in there, you have a malformation, be careful not to make it congenital now.

If our soldier made the mistake of killing a child, and it is a true mistake, then he is more fully responsible, but command still got to look at themselves, not only at the soldier that was not judged or trained well enough, so the repercussions should not be emphasized toward the bottom of the "pyramid" of command. Only if he disobeyed does a soldier is the only responsible, since if he made of himself the conditional weapon of others then he must act accordingly. Logically, this is hard to judge and apply in reality for every kind of situations and complexities, but costly mistakes are often hard to judge whatever the reality. The only way out of this is, again, to have global judgment and decisions from everyone concerned and willing to judge according to the situation. In such a scenario, the responsibility is truly split among everybody just like when you ask a group to choose an option by raising their hands, the action is not chosen by an authority, even if the authority can still manipulate the given choices, or word formulation of them, but this should be minimized...

This minimizing of authority cannot take place in this reality, as the only time that we are asked for our opinion under PMBBD pressure is for voting to choose ourselves exactly that; an authority! And after smiling enough and looking important enough, he will act mainly in the same fashion as all precedent authorities, because he is himself under a system that protect himself from risky personalities, and he's gonna get it if he doesn't follow the line. All those politicians gangs are ruining the planet in pub campaigns, teeth whitening, smile constructing, movement studying, and important looking speeches, we're not far from choosing our authorities from movies "super" "star".

Every country got that flabbergasting expensive political structure and the job they are best at doing is controlling or manipulating the population in all kind of ways so they keep on going, it's even become part of their campaigns to reminder everybody 10 times to go vote, it's the super important thing people forget all the time so meaningful it is, everything will be better, it's not like we're asking your precious and very significative opinion very often you know...I guess people have other priorities, like getting money to eat...Sometimes I wonder what would happen if nobody voted, I bet things would change, at least people would get to the next step of their evolution, the question would pass from "who's the best to run the business?" to "what's wrong with you people?", now we're talking... At least with a high vote percentage they can keep their democracy façade, and keep on bashing in their self-importance...

Every person can increase its efficiency value by having good goals, thus optimizing their human value and increasing different facets of their indispensability giving them a true measure of pride, or they can feel well knowing their value is good globally as toward history, since every person counts. This system of twisted ego "evolution" where we select and manipulate people to fit the reality with selected (manipulated) statistical expertise from all kind of twisted extrapolations of scientific and psy studies of consummation and comportment that are based on PMBBD coming from governments, television, internet, magazines, medias, publicists, Hollywood, psy, school, experts, scientists etc. is inappropriate to find the true way of humanity. I've become very cynical about all the tools to influence people that have developed for this reality, I'm revolted against this entire propaganda machine insinuating all kind of things in their messages, corporations and companies fighting for space and time everywhere possible to stuff my head with their vision of indispensability and responsibility over and over again, worse than going to church, until I know their message by heart sometimes for the rest of my life; yeah, that much!

People are under too much PMBBD influences, so much we have created a mentally incapacitated population to reflect an all wrong and inflexible system, an unconscious enslavement from having no power to revolt, willpower, fears, personal problems of all sorts, quest to survive, TV, limited education. When you study or try to understand politics, your attention is diverted between 360 factors so you forget the true reason for a governing structure, which is not to make itself indestructible, it is to provide services and path of explorations that should imperatively not be made private or left to the natural competition drive of people (like medicine, genetics, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, resources exploitations, money movement strategy, etc) find and encourage best ways of doing things in fairness, even use vast lands and populations to experiment other ways, or systems, to run things. Their goal is surely not to compete or assassinate different governing possibilities from birth by all kind of hypocritical or even direct ways, doing this would be kind of wrong and inconsistent, not only you condemn civilization to one form without exploring other possibilities, but you form (pressure select) the human to fit in thus making it genetically interdependent with it as the ultimate condemnation. I guess that when you have everything to make sense of it all versus what you deducted is supposed to make sense and end-up seeing another reality as the only solution, then it must mean the process have been made irreversible by all the interrelated structures. The options for a different way have become very limited because of condemnations and their interrelations, the reality has taken its final form, everything is inter-adjusted and fiddling with anything would raise a counter pressure from something else; humanity has become like this and like that, it is ready for judgment day, no?

As for making things just and true, again in this reality they are mostly doing the contrary as a weight of matters. Fairness may not always be possible and even when it is possible, it may not be the best way to something, but one thing is for sure; fairness as a goal have vastly more value than palaces and jets as a goal which result in the contrary. Fairness in this reality is a travesty, except maybe at a very low level, even the value of things is totally unfair by the ways of the economic system and by the manipulation of people for profits competition mentality.

Evidently, I'm just judging a point in time of a historical development we may have had no choice to go through. It is a bit ridiculous to talk about making things fair when the planet and people are unfairly divided as countries, and it's not like we had a meeting and decided these things... Next, there is no infinitum on earth, we are not animals who believe in infinity of space and resources; we know logically it is not the case, and one of the totally failed job of governments was to encourage the finding and attaining of that equilibrium or fairness in everything. Their job is not to pass their time dreaming of how to gain votes, or deal satisfaction between this or that pressure gang, passing their time contemplating nation competition, and you don't give birth to people to create jobs to create more infrastructure and facilities that create more jobs! And then import people to do the jobs and augment the economy that end-up as a competition of the biggest stash or most expensive lifestyle...If there are too many cities or people then we should arrange things so there are less, not more in the name of revenues or the superiority of our flag! A fucking lot is based on country competition, and a fucking lot of means are wasted for this, the military machine only a fraction, while the only valid reason for borders is to protect differences, which contradict the result of the competition which is multiculturalism standardization from the pressure of economy performance to remain competitive in something, add that to the pressure selection process and you reap a sure fail in the long run. Maybe we're still a few thousands of years from that, and we'll be a failure from something else long before that, no need to worry, but imagine all what we'll have wasted to keep things fundamentally unfair, the whole solar life! Worse, one of the greatest quest a country can take to form cultural difference is to develop an alternative system, and we compete that to elimination out of fear it could succeed at being competitive, talk about stupid...

But having parades of expensive politicians everywhere competing against each other and doing important looking meetings is not enough, you need a fantastic batch of lobbyists running everywhere to mess everything furthermore, and they're costly as hell too, and I'm not talking about all those diplomatically invincible people who run about the world to encourage trade "relations" or something, but didn't we invent the phone at some point? I guess the true reason is to enjoy the most expensive restaurants and hotels, and go to the luxury prostitutes spots of each country to develop their version of love. Add a bundle of multinational self-interests, and a delegation of looking for profiting businessman and everything is gonna be allright. All this show cost to the world as a whole a continent like America of production and pollution, and that is just the surface, on which they invest lots of money, I skipped all the "evil behind" that is destroying and degrading the human soul and form. And the worst in that is that there is nothing to do, we are condemned, you wouldn't dare punch one, they are admired saints worth invincibility, infinity, totality, in exaggeration. Tolerance, peace, don't kill yourself good people, you aint got the means, and it's true.

Nothing wrong, military production is a business, we build killing weapons for profits, think about that a little while they meet at the next G summit. You think your governments are ignorant? Innocents? I prefer to think they go to school too long and they end up with the system imprinted as a map to success in their head and they strictly don't know where good and truth is anymore or why they are there or what is going on, they only know how to be a government or a powerful "G" while making expensive cosmetic changes and participating in their sects activities, really, they're all part of a sect, why?

Business as usual, we have sold military weapons all over the place, even the police got tanks these days, the militarization of the earth is total, and governments have no responsibility in the death? And what about their responsibility in religious wars and mind degenerations? And when everybody has weapons it is easier to justify war, and any minimally competitive nation needs an inferior place to show his might, so the powerful need to sell minimal killing ability to everybody to have a destruction playground, or make use of their blue helmets, that way every corner is covered, you take the façade of saviors while distributing weapons and selecting the place where there's something to gain practicing your killing machine next, since everybody got weapons to settle some different, they're all inferior tribes of violent and you're the good superior one interposing itself between those child while spreading your culture....And it is important to have a "baddie" to tame, one that is able to kill some soldiers, that way people at home want him dead and are ready to continue spending on military might. The PMBBD is more complex and profound than that but it seems governments (people voting) have no problem acting to worsen things, weird, at least we'll suppose they have good intents whatever the actions they do to develop hell on earth....Still, they are the ones, with their religions, having the most responsibility in the militarization of the world and the death of billions of people full of good potential or intents. For now, even if a democracy-capitalism government that made this possible, wanted to cut back on military spending to sane standard, his military advisors gangs have too much power or influence and the best he would be able to deal out of them is a slight decrease in spending, 10$ at best, or maybe they could get rid of some rusted atomic bombs they don't want to sell; for image, ...but maybe they'll sell a collector's edition, with Einstein's signature, these are not supposed to blow up.

If we have many technologies it's thanks to military people running with guns everywhere, they say, don't forget that for a twisted justification, expensive scientists too say that a lot of tech we have on earth come from the international space station, but it's mostly PMBBD for grants; we could have done most of this on earth at a fraction of the cost and exploitation. And stop this international bullshit too; if we truly wanted to cooperate we would not have needed a space station for that! The positive value of that station in the last 10 years is sitting in weightlessness a long time, and looking out the window, and repairing. Do they grow genetically working free-fall plants? I think not. But yes, it's nice to study life in constant free fall, and looking out the window is an important job, we need people watching for invading aliens out there. It's just that 4 billion dollars a year is a bit on the expensive side of the spectrum for that, and I'm not talking about the resources (human resources?) and pollution involved, which will still burn aplenty after the station becomes a place for tourists to suddenly become a class apart, special people nobody can understand, like me, they've been to space, wow, nobody can argue about anything, like me, they grew a consciousness! It's just that me I'm the real thing, you just fell a long time, something parachute people do all the time.

For those with afterdeath visions, just know that if we are to be judged, it will be for the totality of our history as a species, as much as our individual part in it, the little change of mind we had before dying haven't got much worth against all we could have tried or done before to change our ways, particularly those who took loads of means. Did I take lots of means? I shouldn't even write this book, I should be peacefully in love away from any city, what is my cost? Who got the means? Me? I should be peacefully in love but I have a mind and I witness what is happening and I see nobody truly attacking the source. You want to force me to live hell all my life because I don't want to be a traitor to myself? That's your choice, but I'll have taken a different path, I won't be responsible for the result of your system, I never believe it was good or the best, I worked to explain and bring the germ of another option because my judgment told me humanity would lose its potential in the next 100 years. I'm all wrong? Nobody gives a shit about my opinion?

In the end, politicians will be looked upon as a symbol of unbelievable failure for all what they manipulated people to believe they stood for, they made a system to take control of people's lives and they are bringing them to massive problems while discarding responsibility. Every new politician doing its little part to condemn humanity, until they can do nothing seriously effective unless they reap a revolt and mass death because they both brainwashed people and grew a selection to fit the system, a system continuing an old momentum from the past on which its strongest believers spent all their energy making it invincible, condemning humanity to it.

We may last another hundred years with fantastic efforts and continual patching of the pyramids that will look like change, until our worst nightmare become reality, having to change the fundamentals of everything, and there, in the face of the invincible monster we created, we'll go crazy with change worsening everything in a planetary mess of unbelievable proportions. We must start now developing a different way because fundamental change when it will be too late will be done in a panicked attitude out of animal fear, the same for freezing in place...

Apart from that, a washing machine of old lasted around 10 years or more, while today it will last around 5 years (with the exception of the commercial ones, strange...). The same for cars and everything else, why can't we produce lasting stuff? It could be a goal with many benefits you know (Except for high profitability maybe), are we seeking the same for our relations? Pseudo-scientific love for profit anybody?

The electronic and computer industry exploits and pollutes the planet like there's no tomorrow to bring us their fabled 10% performance increase in computer power every year, no more, it looks like they control its development so they can keep on making unbelievable profits to pay the unbelievable salaries of their top visionaries. There should have been an explosion of mixed technologies around 2000, that should have opened the way to different architectures. The macintosh is one tangent computing have taken in a hundred not explored, smart phones, gaming machines, but we never developed other architectures than the x86 clocked thing (like multiplexing), it's like the system, we decided to condemn ourselves to this, it's the best I bet they're saying, and they may be right, but I wouldn't be so sure of people too religiously sure, me included, but I'm not so sure, that's the difference, I explore and open possibilities, I don't close or compete these to elimination, but it doesn't mean I don't have an opinion. It may be the best and only architecture possible of the universe, all aliens the same kind of processor, but I don't believe it. I say they stuck to one architecture right at the start and reached tremendous mass production the fastest way possible to bring profits and to control competition, instead of spending, and yes losing, money exploring more possibilities and developing other ways, maybe better or less polluting. I bet the worst nightmare of these companies is to see a technology that could make their factories obsolete, or one they would have had a hard time profiting from.

Changing the basic architecture would be too complicated? Too hard to remake the programming? Are we doing the same thing with computers as we do with reality? Condemning ourselves to one architecture with its associated programming? How many manufacturing plants does it take to churn out all those computer parts with a slight increase in performance every few months for stuff that ends-up in the garbage after a few years? I'm sure you could shut down half of all electronic production by making more complete and higher quality things produced in a longer time lapse like a year and it would change nothing to the software and associated tech developments since those go on whatever the hardware, platform or architecture, they'd just deal with better made and more complete components. But maybe you wouldn't gain as much profitability by having others priorities, and some people would lose jobs! But not when you develop automation? We'd have more time to think of better innovations, more stable technology, less programming headaches, all that would give a more worthwhile jump in performance, less garbage and pollution too.

The next step, instead of making something that show they want people to have an easier life while polluting less, will be to make all kind of diverse "in" and "concept" gadgets looking like a hybridization of star trek and signature fashion, thousands of different patent looking trendy, and they'll brainwash the whole planet in hype to see the stuff as extraordinary, people will think they're evolved in the future, that they are smarter and all. They'll have created a huge market full of competitors producing mountains of electronic garbage lasting a few years, or ending up cumulating in people's homes until they die choked, there will be more jobs for people to be pressured to seek, the economy will turn more. Big happiness, that's what's coming.

The profits are not as big when we act good and well, when we think about fairness, others, and the future of our world. Still, I'm supposing things, but one thing is for sure; there's always a better, or best, or ideal way to do things which is not what this reality seeks. Sure that I like todays portable phones, in fact I find the fact that they exist totally perfect in the scheme of everything, the universe would have to be reformulated if they couldn't exist, It's just that they have not taken their best form and the path we have chosen to their development is quite retarded, but evil got portable phones now, not me, I could even say that there should be a tendency for truly good people to be the last ones to get a portable in hell, and the selection continues... What I want is a complete computer that will provide me with all I need as fast as I'm supposed to get it without hassles, including protection paranoia of competition for a mountain of bits of programs I got to fish around for a headache because the job is not initially well done. I want a complete unit that just works to serve all my gadget and communication needs without running around to make it deliver my wishes simply like it should be. Why don't they concentrate on that for a while instead of doing half complete designs at all sauces? Can't put it all in one because competition? Patent infringements?

Give me an openable computer with a thin line in the middle the size of a bible with total options, windows no hassle where you have instant net access, where you can play any games, belt clipped, or dropped in a handbag (it doesn't need weight 20 pounds) with sensor mouse options like moving your fingers on the back of the "book" while you're in the bus, or a finger mounted mouse sensors as another option, there are more, with a wrist clipped retractable 40 touch easily switchable keyboard for the other hand. Are you waiting that I do it myself? I don't want specialized devices for internet fooling around, or fragile "design" gadgets, or big portable which lack versatility and quickly end up whole in the garbage out of dysfunctional parts; I'm talking about portative home computers without CD you can plug in any wall for an automatic hassle free high bandwidth internet connection while recharging, but I guess that's the last thing that will be made in a competitive reality doing things for profits arising from big pub campaigns that don't idealize their product at all...That would resize the paper and portable, gadgets and calculator industry to a fraction of what it is today with all associated negative effects, and you'd have a very effective and complete tool to go to school, keypad diversity, with enough screen real estate to play movies and games, eliminating all those game and apps made market specific to fit your gadget, etc, and no need to dump the whole thing if a part doesn't satisfy you or get updated.

Instead I'll watch this industry go through all king of gadgetry to make monstrous profits from "new" and "wow" stuff; competition is so innovative it is overwhelming the place in a senseless diversity of gadgetry like we're supposed to develop electronic at a greater diversity than food. The joke is that those things don't last, pollute like crazy and need rare resources. I say this industry lost its mind, and electronic he too may become a condemnation; at the crazy rate we produce electronics for profit, we may leave be stuck in 100 years without the means to produce some electronics.

Evidently, I see things as a matter of fairness, and in a fair reality there are far less people for far more efficiency from a better arrangement of priorities, and people all have the basic tools to have the same potential as everybody else, what I call a civilization basis, so production emphasis would be very different.

Do you think you need that many cable, telephone, dishes, microwaves, and towers companies to communicate? No, and unless you think logos or antennas diversity makes all that a must, then the important part is research and testing to find and develop the best system, when your goal is to provide fair service for something as important as communication. The mess we have today is the result of governments not taking their responsibilities, leaving sacred things in the hands of competition. I'd say the competition ways of this reality produces twice the exploitation, production, pollution, spending of money and workforce for the result of mediocrity (some better, some worst, none the best), unless you got the means not to care about mediocrity, like the top bosses of these companies, and I'm not talking about the 200 rich lobbying gangs fooling around communication...

The basic idea that you need one main communication channel, a good one, land based, cellular towers with dishes, and a few satellites to attach everything well. Governments should work toward developing that, while communication companies do their usual job of competing against each other over the market (people's money). You think you got to pay an exorbitant amount of money for a minimal communication that makes sense as an evolutionary service? You like shopping around the complexity and limits they created for profit? But yes, it can't work like I say in this reality, and businesses are market things that need to perform, and governments don't think it's part of their job to make things fair, and they're always scratching money everywhere to build palaces and protect their system, so they sure can't provide services adequately, it got other priorities than putting its energy developing things at their best.

Electric car were possible 40 years ago, at the right time, and what did competition do? And now governments will spend billions on car industries to "force" them to innovate while the other side of the mouth will say that competition forces innovation! Competition creates limits for competition to exist as the tool to create pyramids, in big part, innovation is not dependent from competition, in fact, using competition to push innovation makes it so innovation doesn't start under its best form, maybe not its worst, but not its best. To remove competition in innovation is to innovate the system itself to base it on people deciding things that concern them directly, yeah...

And more creation than we think in this world is done by ordinary people's imagination, not out of competition and wishes of profiting, just for the fun of experimenting and imagining! Competition can use many drives to take form, so it's a general principle that can become highly genetic, even if there is no specific competition gene, but seeing everything as competition has already influenced many genes, and not only from pressure selection, but directly too. I could even say it's another condemnation, we pushed competition so far that it has become a problematic facet of humanity that we won't be able to reverse unless we start over with different emphasizes (new reality). Or you could say that the biggest pool of people in the reality we made are driven by competitions over this and that, and the other side effect is an increase of the pool bearing unconscious revolted attitudes, the "who cares" aspect of society, which is where most of the losers end-up. But while it is understandable to have tons of losers in a reality that sees everything as a competition, what I particularly hate are losers competing and bitching, worse, doing it with a self-inflated attitude, it's kind of a depressing view of life... If competition got a negative effect on people, which is the case in most situations in this reality, then it has no place in that situation. I idealize competition at a personal level mainly, at the social level I think its best place is fun, game, sports, all in all, as a non self-derisory way of learning or practicing skills, not bearing a monetary or social position stigma. Competition for profitability is an enemy of humanity and it brings nothing good, whatever you think, when you study it globally in every human facets. And the rules of competition for profitability are unfair ones limiting and standardizing creativity and people, even if it may seem the contrary.

And we're lucky when people's creativity is not stolen by controlling maniacs on the lookout for opportunities to make profits or gain status for years to come, generations to come. They like to steal (buying a ridiculous price or profiting from innocence is stealing or worst) the imagination worth of others and they do what they want with it. (Imagination can give as much a physical result as a mental one; mixing a good philosophy with PMBBD, particularly around politicians, or religious or sect leaders, can affect people very negatively for their whole live, even for thousands of years, whatever the initial intent was good). Then you have conglomerate tie profiteers trying to control creativity with pressures, sale charts, opinion pools, PMBBD and stashes of money. There are a lot of flies around creativity, as much as there are flies around innocence I guess...

It's like communications, I'm sure the man that invented the telephone didn't think it would be used to bring fortunes to multinational gangs dreaming of making family hegemonies with their caste view of things. Was that his wishes? 50$ a month for basic phone X 12 months X 80 years and you're not far from reimbursing the country debt simply from the cost of communicating a little, a very basic service, and I'm not talking about the cost of all communication profiteers, which is far over 30$ a month. Basic phone and internet communication should not even be seen as a service distributed by "good" profiteers, it's a necessity, everybody is supposed to have it free, the same for many things we have today. A very big part of evolution is decided by what basis the people live from, which permits them to extrapolate farther without unnecessary hassles, complexities, stress, waste of time, anguish or whatever else little evil shit the rich and powerful like to submerge people in. You think we must light fires with rocks to the end of time? You think you'll do country competition and count on your fingers when you'll be traveling the stars?

Some technologies are 20 years in the waiting for all kind of reasons, all the result of gang competition self-protection or limitation from already begun races they cannot quit. Some can't be developed because the people wanting to do it are dependent from the will of some rich that bought the patent for a critical part, or the technology just have the time to be invented while it is already competed to death, or the technology is bought and hidden because it would dismantle a whole competing industry and market. There are many examples of limitations resulting from competition. An industry is like competitive sport; how would you react if I decided your team sport must be eliminated? Most sports invented are still being played today and that's what they want of giving birth to an industry; it must forever grow and be eternal like a god, so they make all kind of limits to protect their gang.

So if competition best place is as an enjoyment thing, then seeing everything as a competition you end-up with living as a game where the best cheaters win, kind of. But life, people or civilization are not a game, a reality that sees everything as a game of competition with all kind of limitations forming the rules of all the competitions must be made game over, even if it will end one way or the other because all games end, whatever the effort at making those games eternal, because a game is made of limitation and a winner from dividing, selecting, limiting and standardizing everything. So we shouldn't act like humanity is a game if we want to succeed as a species and live eternally.

The power button of the gaming machine is ego competition, push it and you start playing humanity as a game. And that's what we're trying to do by competing everything like a game. And why does a game end? Because fairness or equilibrium in totality is not possible, and you try while learning things, to become the most "unfair" one in your vision of what is good (that can be anything), and that's what will end this reality; unfairness, you didn't keep the equilibrium necessary to keep it going eternally. it is not a machine, it is life, it is a wheel of change, you move with it, you reach goals, and you don't know when or if it will end, and life surely don't want you to strip it of all possibilities by your ego nationalist competition games. But it is too late, the game is ending, unless an accident happens, a crash, or a power shortage. That may give us another chance at being human, but there is a tremendous price to pay. I could say there is another option that is less humanly costly, and that is transfer of functions for resetting. That can be done if you can last around 30 years without grave problems, while deleting and cleaning. But the game we play is a cheater's game, full of profiteers everywhere, you can't do something without losing the good of it to one or the other, so it is probably useless to think about that. Probably people will kick the machine out of getting frustrated knowing that they will never be the one to win for whatever unjust or cheating reasons because the machine is made by people making a pressure selection. And not only people are absolutely justified to destroy the game machine, even if they're dependent and will regret it, but they must do it, humanity is not a game, what is supposed to drive humans are ideals, projects, principles, not competition games. Making of competition a pillar of reality will simply invalidate it game over.

So here we are with a computer that starts, overheat, stink and crash in a loop until burn-down or no power; many civilizations died starting it, every big ego is attracted to the "power" button, once pushed people start sweating for you. How long? That depends with what and in what quantity you stuff people with, food, hype, PMBBD and entertainment among many, everything will go well for some very variable time, big ego will grow, workers will admire and dream, but in the end the button should never ever be pushed because whatever the fantastic complexity you develop you're always overwhelmed in the end because it's an ego trap, a wheel that always gain momentum until condemnation, you have started a competition, a game, between superior godhood entities and your workers, a competition to take the top that will always grow and become expensive until war or no resources, or until you are hit by a limitation generations after generations of working hard people thinking themselves good have shoveled forward.

Now, what can the democracy-capitalism business do to truly change anything of all I've described to date that I don't like of this reality? Nothing, strictly nothing, nothing, n, n, nothing, that's the level of its impotence, old, profiteer, pedophile, invalid and senile. All those millions of expensive politicians doing democracy can't even do one of these things, even if yes, they make their system work and evolve. But it's understandable since the public figure, the one representing the population they say, is not the one bringing revolutionary ideas, he mainly manages what's proposed to him by his advisors who know well the many control or pressure gangs that are the true government; technocrats, bureaucrats, financials, industrialists, lobbyists, militarists, all the different bureau like the NSA, DEA, FBI, CIA and the secret ones, then there are PMBBD devices, publicists, the show, news and their expert of hype, Hollywood, and there are many others I mentioned earlier; there is enough of a list to need a memorandum. Evidently, I used some U.S. evident examples, but you understand that to really change something, you'd need to profoundly redefine all those intuitions, flush most of their personnel, and they won't let you do it without trying to attack your integrity...

As for the public figure, to rise to its status, it needs one hell of a stash of money, one fantastic PMBBD machine, one fantastic protection machine and experts and advisors of all kind. Every country, every province or state got many batches of them competing against each other, over cosmetics mainly... Altogether, they are so costly versus what they do it's ridiculous, and the end result of their elections is as good as flipping a coin, I'm sure the world would not be worse if we selected them this way...

There are valid reasons for politicians to be costly too, but most are no better than bankers, and both are fantastically costly versus what they provide as a service. Yet, they have no choice to exist in this reality, they made themselves indispensable and they took the means to have everything in exaggeration, whatever through their fantastic pay, or through all the panoply of things already provided for their comfort. There are good politicians, many with good intents, but I won't defend them or their innocence, their cost is absolutely irrational and they made things dependent from many evident evils.

Politicians are among the people with the worst human value for the amount of money spent on them and the means they control presently. And I know they're a part of a system that took control people's lives, including their own, and separated then distributed their aspects to a panoply of control for profitability gangs, but this was attained by political actions through history, so even if it is a job like any other, even if most are not paid exaggeratedly, their system is too expensive for their effect (except self ass protection effects) at taking the best decisions or changing things for the best, and they're the ones with the means, they are the only ones that are supposed to be able to change things in their best manner, which they cannot do no more because in the name of privatization for competition of human aspects that are sacred, they relinquished control of these critical aspects to people who quickly grew a mega stash out of them, and then made more politicians under the form of lobbyists who can further provide benefits to politicians having more influence than themselves. These companies are intrinsic to the system now, and they deal with billions of dollars, so you can't take back the life aspects they control without risking your own life.

Governments have known about global warming and overpopulation for a long time, if they had reacted or if they had the power to react, with true efforts, we wouldn't be in this situation, but they passed 50 years fighting to make it inexistent or a natural thing, to the point that we still don't know if it is really happening while we're deep in its evidences, we'll have to wait until people die everywhere before they redirect people's energy (money) to really have an effect. I guess competitive scientists are losing too much credibility too; it's becoming too hard to believe what they're saying.

Maybe I'm too hard, they successfully replaced some toxic chemicals by another chemical one time, the CFC's that were toxic for the ozone layer, but they probably replaced the stuff because the replacement cost almost nothing more to produce for their industrial friends. They did save a few areas of wild life by making parks too, no choice about it. Everything is like that, car industrialists have not suddenly turned green, they make an effort because there can be profits, or it won't reduce profits, why don't we interdict them to impose pub (leading to less car sales)? Why don't governments remove some budget from war machine production or research to put it on developing electric roads? As for the ozone layer, we never again heard about it; is it repaired? Maybe its composition changed letting the sun in, or it settled as thinner all over, or the effect slowed down or even decreased making everybody proud of the great civilization, and never forget that everything is cyclic in life, it could look repaired before scaring us still more. Maybe things even worsened and scientists are being paid to close their mouth, or even say the contrary while skin cancer continues increasing. Why does skin cancer increases? The sun is more intense all of a sudden? But scientists are flabbergasted that the sun is skipping one of its higher intensity phase! Is there somebody we can believe in? And what is all the medical PMBBD we hear about that we're so healthy and maladies are being cured while the reality is that there is more? More medication and pills pissed everywhere too. I surely won't say it is worthless but maybe some people are lying to keep their worthless expensive research to produce more chemical pills, and now that throngs of people are dependent, I can make the affirmation that pharmaceutical industries are a reality condemnation; we can't do a little move without reaping a mountain of troubles from all the dependences they and their psy friend produced, humanity is dependent from psy and pharmaceutical, anybody that scares this humanity a little or try to steer it will reap massive dependence troubles.

We must not forget that many scientists are rich these days, and don't think scientists can't be corrupted, they are people like everybody else and many are fatly paid by government grants; easy to have one say what you want, everybody only got one life after all, if it can be lived safely with a pile of money then to hell with the world. When bears will come knocking at our doors, you'll see excited lower grade experts come to make the observations on TV, then, with the help of reporters, they'll start studying the phenomenon, but we'll never know that a scientist already knew all about it 20 years ago...

50 years, how many politicians went to power within that time all over the world? Or just the G summit gang that could give the example instead of passing years dealing themselves promises, why would you trust politicians to keep their promises? It's not like they're super good at that, so here we go Kyoto... Things could slowly have changed; at least we'd be really trying to control ourselves, it is quite a failure. But we had no trouble spending for war, more people and more production, no problem! Today, we can't even think of slowly readjusting, we must take drastic measures, if not we'll fight over where to dump the responsibility, and with PMBBD, that will lead to a 50/50 division between not our fault and our fault, trying to forget such notion such as "contribution", effectively eliminating responsibility through disinformation, and getting masses walking blindly again in the pointed direction, and that is sure not to vote for the stupid green party, since it would have to change name and think of better uses for money than greeneries...

The same for overpopulation and overproduction, for 70 years they have known that we are over the healthy self-sustaining capacity of the earth and instead of encouraging a decrease in birth rate, they encouraged more birthing, and more production for their competitions of superiority, full blown genetic engineering thrown planetary wide, and now that we condemned the earth to toxicity and condemned humanity to unfairness, they say we'll be allright with a few billions more because manipulators try to make it a myth with charts proving everything is normal and nobody has the methodology to take in consideration all what's involved, like everybody got a rotten brain with only a few sane cells left, we can grow population to 15 billions because some expert calculated that's how many people could live (survive) on earth, only then will there be overpopulation problems, but what about pollution? What about fairness? What about resources? What about how long? We reached overpopulation on a globality of factors at 5 billions, let's kill evil now, it's a priority or we die. Next, when troubles will be sufficiently evident for the "leadership" to react (last to react, where is the lead? And deciding things because you made the system so only you can decide is not leadership), those that will be in the most troubles will be "inferior" countries (nations) or races in the competition, not the ones taking the most space, or having their culture spread the most, and so the poor and innocent will get mass death, surely not evil don't worry, those will compete as saviors for image after that.

A dictator in this reality has more action power than a democratic government even if they are usually very harsh with their populations, sometimes with good reasons. But you don't develop good dictators here, and it's one of the mains reasons why they have all the democratic weapons turned against them; they end-up more dangerous as a person more than anybody else, and rich and evil too, even if the democracy capitalism business serves far more such unfair people, except they don't have to run a country alone at the whip, only a facet of things...

So dictators think they are the solution to every problem and they indoctrinate the population to believe things will be far better with their controlling hands on things, they use all kind of arguments that make sense to get the people to believe they got the messiah while the guy is never a reflection of what he preaches. Once they're in power, most of them only think of growing rich beyond measure while building palaces everywhere. Their incompetence covers a lot of history to the point that someone who is really good and serious doesn't have a chance in the world to run things or gain credibility; they destroy not only the mind of people but they destroy any chance for a better way to exist because they use all what is good for their power-trip (religions do the same with spirituality), creating conflict in the mind of masses, and if you use the same good arguments they used, you end up compared to them in the twisted experience people had with that kind of philosophy.

So the good stuff ends-up desecrated to PMBBD, and all is left to people is always the same kind of unfairness under a different form, another dictator, another terribly painful illusion, until you involve voting principles. So don't come at me saying that I like dictators, for me they are only the original start at structuring in an ego reality, they give birth to more complex and complete forms of governance. And they want people as crazy as themselves while most are suicidal, and they know it, and they'll try to drop some big baddies with them like it's supposed to make them good for it. Furthermore, when your authority figures are mixed in military campaigns, with nationalism implanted historical stuff, and the will to defend some PMBBD, well, the results can be impressive...The worst possible horror for a country is to be stuck with a harsh dictator without a wish to bring about another form of governance. Now, we should be careful of media people who will qualify anybody that cheated at democracy a dictator, in my experience, governments that don't cheat are very rare, I've seen the greatest democracy defenders cheat over and out, and people are still in admiration because media people liked him...

I debarked from democracy at the 95 referendum for Quebec's sovereignty. At that epoch I was waking up to the reality I lived in, and for me this referendum to separate was a serious thing. It was like the last frontier of choice, it was the first time in my life that I was being asked my opinion on something else than choosing a politician. It was an opportunity to show me Democracy at it best; important changes were at stakes and I had my say in it. What's more, I was trying to enjoy reality at that epoch, I had cast aside the cloud of my past and looked forward to an epoch of big changes with cool computers, robots everywhere, hunger and war ending, fantastic cities, super transportation, not much work to do, and people on the moon and love...No, not that much. I knew I was dreaming, and this referendum had no use in my opinion, whatever I was happy to have something to say; yes or no. Well, got to start somewhere. In my life I will have directly said "yes" to something that concern people like me, I'm so excited.

I always saw Québec as weird sexist experiment. When the British invaded they could have cleared us easily, they didn't do it and I don't believe in big favors given by invaders, so I was against separation in the first place, for me, it would end badly one way or the other, but a good measure of nationalism made it easy to eventually change my opinion.

When I try to weight things today, I'd vote for flushing the Canadian vision as quick as possible because we are dying perverted instead of living a grand "love" story. What's more, it started as it should be in this reality, unfairly; we should have been given the right to develop half Canada right from the start, and this "simple" failure invalidates any bullshit idealism about harmony since one was advantaged right from the beginning. Now, Canada is coast to coast, we scared them, they almost lost a coast, so we'll get perverted to invalidity one way or the other.

I didn't see things as bad at the time, I had gained some feelings of nationalism and I didn't like it to be controlled by old invaders, but I didn't like big Parizeau either, a fat banker with ideas of grandeur? Doesn't look good...but he was right in the end for saying his version of a referendum was lost to the hands of Montréal's multitude of fearful for their gang, "minorities" (not when all taken together). Yet, at least I was being asked for my opinion and I liked it.

It quickly turned to a joke worse than an electoral campaign, enough so that all the bickering and twisted argumentation made me totally lose sight of my priorities and what I wanted. And that goes without talking about the question that was half the debate. As soon as they started trying to find the ideal question that would protect us from manipulation, I found the ideal question right away while they carried on debating the question to the end of the campaign and guess what? The final question contained elements of manipulation! And all this while I thought someone would think of my question; they have very learned experts particularly for manipulation purpose, they're supposed to be intelligent those expensive politicians and their batch of technicians, experts, specialists and counselors! Surely they have enough brains with all that not to make a manipulative question! For those who want to make a referendum on sovereignty, here is what kind of question you should ask to please someone like me and stop wasting time on such an easily eliminated problem. This question contains neither positive nor negative autosuggestion manipulation elements. "Live in the country of Canada_? Live in the country of Quebec_?" is that so hard to understand? Was that so hard to find out? It took me 5 minutes to make that question. Another example? Do you want the Quebecker nationality or do you want the Canadian nationality? So they passed most the campaign bitching over an option in the question that meant their priority was manipulation, one side wanting a positive suggestion question, the other a negative one, and the positive one won because they decided in the end! Hurrah Democracy!

Another big part of the debate was over what was a "majority". That was our second referendum in Quebec and they still passed most of their time on these two stupid questions! For me a majority as the name implies was a simple thing; it was 60% just like school! 50 plus a 10 percent safety margin that I considered the minimum to counteract manipulation or a "bad mood spike", and I have the same opinion for elections. Quebecers have a tendency to be emotional and that's a good thing unless someone profits from it which happens too often (psy and the pharmaceutical industry are good at that). The separatist decided and their final decision, you guessed it, was 50+1% which is more like a I don't know, maybe yes, maybe no, you got a candy? The bag is empty? A beer then? Hurray Democracy! When things became critical the federal government spent a billion to pay a trip to people from all across Canada to come to where? Montreal! To wave their flags and say "we love you Quebec!" being emotional people, it worked to enough an extent to save the day. The other thing that pissed me off is that people kind of completely forgot their history, it was all about the money, and while we wanted our own identity, it seems nobody mentioned that Canada was peacefully developing as a French place before being invaded and taken over by the British; so what is this separation thing like we're married? We were independent before we got beaten and imprisoned, what a marriage! And not as savages, we had cities! Such decisive, unjust and condemning historical moments! We didn't have time to grow before they arrived; no wonder my grandparents were manipulated to have families of 15, if they didn't there wouldn't be a French place on this continent.

Without taking into account the fact that we didn't separate, the end result was the worst possible scenario. They talked so much that the end result was 50%! Instead of spending all this money for their manipulation campaign, they only had to ask our opinion right away and I'm sure the result would have been nearer the truth. They did an opinion poll a few months later and the result of it was totally different; around 60% for, and the cheating federal panicked and made a pub campaign all over the province to glorify Canada, to prevent the next government to do a winning referendum, but at the same time a liberal (federal) government got elected in Quebec, strange...Today, I'd say 30% would vote for separation, I wonder what happened...

We are strong on doing opinions pools for manipulation here, they start an election from the results of opinion pools, and media people change their speech proportional to opinion pools, most of which are not representative, they even do that while giving news, giving the illusion that your opinion means something, but to tell it you have to watch the news...

At the same time we got 50%, bush got presidency in the United States by 51% and I think it was the French president that got elected 51% too. Hurrah Democracy... 50% is not a majority, it is a choice, choose one or the other, a truth is not a majority and a majority is very far from making truth or the best, particularly one that have been taken the value of judgment of, or one that is under PMBBD influence.

So the banker made his referendum and he lost by a few votes, almost creating another country, divide to reign and he failed to divide so he lost his reign. Had he won, he would have reigned for many interminable years, we'd still be rolling him around to this day, he would be something like Quebec's Fidel Castor... And that's what I found particularly revealing, the fact that it was a banker that almost succeeded doing it, then I made the association of democracy to capitalism as a business.

Even if I didn't like the system and politics in advance, I was ready to believe it could be used to something else than choosing a politician and it absolutely and absurdly failed. Democracy became a tool to run a business, manipulation, cheating, competition, division, mediocracy, something to dumbfound people while exploiting their life energy, and the more you spend money trying to manipulate, the more the end result is like flipping a coin. I never voted again and nobody will force me to it and I don't care how you use my vote, stuff it where the color fit...

It is my opinion that populations are too emotive from hype to make current democracies valid, people are too susceptible to manipulators, and too devoid of the facts of the person, so no politician should have a right to power when the result is close, the election should have been restarted every time it happened. Furthermore, it is still based on a selection process, those who believe in the system. So they pass their time glorifying democracy everywhere, a true brainwash, they'll even boast liberty with it, like they're synonyms, which is total PMBBD.

Now, even if I may not like bosses elected flush, most of those campaigns are not even "legal" following their own laws; don't think stuffing a piece of paper in a box is a proof that it is safe, you only need 10 manipulated ones to win the election for a whole Country like Canada. And what of it if one get caught? Nobody gets incarcerated, the election is not even discarded as a cheat; there will be an expensive twisted inquiry instead, some punition to someone insignificant and hurrah Democracy! And it happens regularly. Don't think those who got the means can't modify the truth of history, we should know that by now, we lost the 95 referendum at the hand of a criminal, he caused the referendum to fail and prevented the situation to happen ever after. Quebec should be a country but it is not; the criminal made history and it is too late, history have been made, hurrah Democracy.

Now, a political campaign is extremely expensive and people got to run everywhere to vote, so I guess it's a bit utopist to use it for anything else than to choose bosses, but that should have been invalidated as soon as people could make monetary transactions online; if you can protect money you can protect voting. The problem is that doing this would make politicians more and more insignificant. So 99% of the use of Democracy is to choose bosses that will keep the business running, competition over survival, all singing about their great economy of unfair profiteers; you can bet that it would quickly crash if they didn't make a paranoia about it, and the most responsible would be them for spending "their" economies stupidly. But sometime, some places, people can tell their opinion on something important, after another worst campaign, while making it big so people remember forever and be forever reticent; they won't want to tell their opinion often for sure that way, imagine, billion dollars campaigns after campaigns, exhausting, ruining.

So we have opinion pools of limited pools of emotive people, to have an idea of manipulation strategies and to know what people think to have time to react, prepare and manipulate, and we have a throng of expensive people who, they say, represent the population, with experts and scientists, who end-up representing those pub campaign, and the people affected by them, the population who necessarily have to fit the systematization.

The truth is that most people are not much more advanced in fairly telling their opinion than in industrial times, they still need to protest around rich industrials like beggars, they need to take their feet and protest like in old times to control rich gangs dreaming of a monopoly, or family dynasty, hurrah Democracy! And they'll still prefer no protest at all, logical, peaceful protest is not enough, that's why their police mercenaries are always nearby in big quantity, to control protestations to make them mostly worthless, silenced, ordinary, with a feeling of criminality, often with the help of media institutions. But I'm just talking about a facet; I'm not talking about all the millions of laws that have been invented without protest, or vote.

As for the best system, every country may have the best system (all the same fundamentally, so they can be competitive in ego reality), without talking of the possibilities discarded because they didn't fit, or competed to death before they had a chance to exist. I mean, when you take the means to condemn humanity to a single view, then I suppose you can say you got the best system, but that is dependent on the goals you seek, which can be self-invincibility. We'll see if our system is so hot when we'll meet aliens, because it seems we don't have what it takes to develop and try different alternative ourselves...

I will add that nobody can point at the other, we made a game board of the earth where everybody has proven he can cheat, so why should we cry if America developed as strong enough to be more flagrant in its cheating? The planet has been in a nation competition of cheaters for a long time, did America invent nation competition? Not at all, but either we played the game or we were invaded.

When you learn at school that the democracy-capitalism business is the best system and how it works to bring people to power or to represent your place, it all looks good, the emphasis is on the pretty, and glorification abounds aplenty, things are always biased since you're living in that system and you are supposed to defend it, in fact, you'll learn to defend it, to see it as fair enough. Politicians learn how their system work, getting limited in their belief and possibilities, they learn how to run the business and then they defend it religiously, and it's not a system, it's a business, democracy is the recruiting structure of capitalism, where everything is supposed to end-up on the trade market. It's the best system past and future and that there can't be a better one, since they learned the perfect leader formulae; leave no doubt to your competence and beliefs.

Sometimes I wonder if we didn't make a system to glorify the most fearful and deficient people around, so high on the pyramids, far away from any risk, heavily protected, and with a monopoly of violence, all is missing is a bunker to protect their precious skin, deep underneath their pyramids with their loving workers. Mummified in a cold coffin I might add, so we can resuscitate them later to watch their face when they'll see what can be done without their great indispensability. Not only they're not indispensable in another reality but they don't even have to exist! Poof! No more of them! You don't believe that eh? I'll eliminate all of them rich controlling gangs and money stashers, it will simplify everything, the air will gets cleaner, forests will grow back, food and wellbeing for everybody, war will ends, a true and complete miracle!

For now politicians made themselves eternally interdependent with you, the voter! Remove one and the other prepare for war! So yes, in ego reality, they are truly indispensable, if we eliminate them it will be the total anarchy they'd prefer over a fairer system, because they took control of all facets of being human to distribute those to competitive exploiters for marketing. But sorry to tell you that they were never supposed to become a condemnation, they were never supposed to reign forever, and what they have done as a systematization, and what they have done to people's mind is, well, I erased the next few phrases.

Now, even if I say we are condemned, let's not forget it's just my strong opinion that sure is not very politically adequate, what's more, we must not forget that there are exceptions and opportunities that may happen which can be used to truly change things, and in the end, what is created by people can always be demolished or changed by people who truly want it hard enough, putting their willpower to the test.

And don't tell me I'm making a paranoia, the democracy-capitalism business is doing and spreading planetary paranoia, with its security points, psy, cameras and spies everywhere, police and military, in fact, if I'm paranoid it's because this reality made it so I'm scared of the future when I use my brains, worse if I'm to use the inventiveness of my brains to really have an evolutionary effect. Any arguments will be used to discredit anything that doesn't follow the ways of this reality, a political speech can justify anything, a rallying speech about keeping order maybe? How about a biblical passage?

If we want a different way politicians will have to be set aside, their job will be to help, with strength, with tech, with stability, with laws that will encourage success. It will have to take the form of a father birthing a new entity on mother earth. But I don't believe we'll get this from competitive leadership fresh out of school, it's like asking Christianity to choose its pope in the politician gang, and priest will not do things that could end-up with its institution worthless... So we're kind of stuck, since even if you make tremendous efforts for thousands of years, the unconscious drive of this ideology will forever push profiteers in all cracks.

The only way out of this I see is another reality growing from fair laws where people can choose to go live, another reality altogether, since a system that remove many facets of competition, many aspects of living from the market, and limits accumulation, will always be an unwelcomed "bad system to destroy" for people who succeeded at putting millions in their pockets. The other thing not to forget is that while I blast at the current form of the ego gods ideology, this reality that is a super systematization of ego competition that developed through history under many worse forms. A time immemorial pressure to morph people and pressure select to fit a mentality, even if most people actual ego needs are not that big, very small to normal, it's just that what I described as fundamental rights are logical things, and when I talk logic I'm talking unconscious too, so the normal logical unconscious drive to live well from innocence facing evidence is quickly overtaken by deception, fears and pressures and ideals implanted by the reality spread by all the tools of learning. I know most want more, which is very relative since most do need more, but what is this place where you witness all the possible greatness but it's a battle just to live comfortably for most, where is the unconscious logic of fairness when most people logically can't attain this? People live in a continual pressure from birth to death to get richer, to buy, it is even a continual fear since if you lose your job you are in deep troubles, and they are encouraged by the rich who like to publish books explaining how everybody can be rich like themselves; maybe someday everybody will have a couple of houses, a bunker, a few chalet, sex slaves, 3 cars, 25 TV to cover walls, 6 computers and a yacht and an airport...We got the consciousness to know people are in troubles all over the place, mind troubles too, and no end of it in sight, so what to do? Ignore? Accept? Tolerate? Adapt?

We need a new system as a whole growing entity, we don't want leeches, we want people comfortable and capable of happiness without a castle, who got mutual respect and who hold to principles too. Either we continue as we are, no problem, I'm just a guy and you can prove me wrong, or we birth another "virgin land" that will grow on earth, and make it as perfect as we can from the beginning, and that includes we don't want inadequate people to give a headstart to our selection process, and no problem there since there will be 2 realities. A new land growing from a mathematical formulae related to an ideal population, like we're on a new planet with experience, so it is not an island or a zoo. But where is that growing land? Who will give some space? Nobody will want to do it, it wouldn't be economical, we have better uses for the money, this reality possesses the whole earth, logical, so we'll have to wait until humanity is a failure with the evidence to prove it.

Even if everything seems to work for thousands of years, what counts is the end result; you don't pass an exam by answering a few questions that proves your brain works. We can change or adapt profoundly, even if we only got 100 years, but there is just enough adaptation potential inside that time, we should be living far longer. However, there are already twice too many people and we're on human devaluation and fucking overdrive; we should be making less babies but of better quality, less frustrated in life too. On some facets it may seem to be happening but I'd guess those saying this are blind, and you got the effect of the pyramids growing with population too; more people, bigger classes. Still, history has shown that people's attitude can change drastically fast. I think we can understand the importance of health and colors and impressiveness and prettiness and sexuality, now, let's make the reality that will help and complement such attributes, let's encourage a maximum of skills in a maximum of people, let's give them a comfortable basis that will automatically give them a good value while letting them develop toward their own ideal.

As for nationalism, I like to dream of myself as a citizen of the earth, dreaming I can go wherever I want without hassles, talking to whoever I want without hassles, but I know this cannot happen in this reality since brainwashed to kill nationalists are everywhere. Nationalism with religion is quite a powerful bullshit to fill your mind with, a nice justification for mass killings, uneven division, appropriation, control and exploitation of land and resources that should belong to all.

So I try not to be a nationalist, even if I like my "kind" and place. I'm a citizen of a reality on earth, I live in Quebec, a place I like that got a valuable history forming a culture I like some aspects of, and guess what? I'd say the same thing if I was born in another country! Wow! So if I get this published I won't let nationalist make associations to it, even if it's logical that I talks about the politics and ways of my place since I live there. So this book doesn't come from a flag, from this country or that; it comes from a human on earth; me, nobody else and nothing else. But I'm a bad individualist... Nationalism competition is unbelievably costly for its positive effects, and it is totally and absurdly unfair. What's worse is that my nationality is Canadian, and I don't feel like it at all, I feel like my nationality is Quebecker, but then if I have to bow to laws that don't fit my mentality, all the way to the army, where I am a French Quebecker defending the English Canadian nationality, all the way to the martial law, in its view of liberty.

Cultures have reasons to exist under fairness, but I don't believe there are that many cultures worth the name presently, I'll have to invent a cultural formula that makes better sense because the word is becoming as meaningless as love; it's a free for all, and in this country competition environment, every country think itself not only as a culture, but as "the" culture, or race, in their racist ego godly vision of things, so no way out of it.

There are all kind of examples where we can say this action or attitude is crazy in another culture that is in conflict with our cultural brainwash. Just like me; do I have a culture? I forgot it somewhere so important it is, where's my culture? Strange, I don't feel like I'm missing something. Ah! I found it! It's there! It's part of the social national animal thing, yeah, I miss socialization, I'll go back to some when I'll be finished with all this. And what is culture for you? From what does culture springs anyway? You know, you could be running from a bull by mistake in 1800, and by 2000 you'd have this big carnival every year where you launch a dozen bulls in the streets running at people, hurting them even killing them, but what are the protest and pains of the few when people want so much to have fun? But murder is not fun, it just happens to end up as entertainment on TV...So it would be a big party, you'd have lots of fun, you'd be stupid or frustrated not to participate, economists would make financial predictions of the success of the event and you'd have a committee to make it better next year and pub campaigns to show how it is fun to live in your place. In 200 years of PMBBD and hype, this have become part of the culture of your city and who knows, in another hundred years it may spread...

Even if my example is not the best one, a cultural trait can be anything, and pub and television hype (propaganda) is a decisive factor in cultural development today, whatever the form it takes. Here, among other things, we have hockey and drinking beer and watching television in our culture, quite abnormal for someone like me without a culture, but not for you! Kick the godly screen, shake them a bit and look at them searching for their cultures...But I'm thinking bad, close the pub (under all its forms) machine and you'll lose a lot of today's cultural strength, you don't believe me? 3/4

The other thing is that I believe we have the ability to travel wherever we want cheaply without polluting like crazy, and I don't like it that I'm stuck in a place because of nationalism or means limitations that shouldn't exist. You see all these places that are publicized with the best pictures they can find, for the tourism competition, but the truth of overpopulation scrap the vision. And you wouldn't dare think of all the poverty, be careful of where you set foot tourist, or who you talk to... We should emphasis cheap ship travel, they can be made almost nonpolluting, contrary to plane travel that is totally out of control in this reality. But it's hard to judge these things, planes can go to remote places and they go faster. I'd say personal jets should be illegal, for the rest, I'm sure that with a little effort, we could make them half as polluting and they would be great to me.

But I don't understand why we don't build more quality long range ferries for passengers only, I'd like that, not the gigantic kind of monster for the rich, too expensive, only one boat like this costs a billions dollars a year to run, you're born to ruin a few tribes working hard with one, and whatever you say they are paid by passengers, the end result is the same, you limit safe sea travel to people with lots of money by considering it like a trip to Las Vegas. Sure that nobody will cry over it, it's like giving most of your means or life energy to someone only to end-up revolted against his castle and pollution, you can't do that, so no protest, it is easier to pardon, tolerate, accept and adapt that way too, the tendency is to complaint against attacks to the system, and petty evident crimes become the biggest ones, while the biggest hypocrite ones become insignificant. But that's what people work for, and maybe later they'll make a few trips to feel something, but I'll skip further expressions, someday we'll be condemned under rich stuff which will need half the planet working hard to sustain, what is the worth of a yacht in living people? (Pollution is less people living, or more working to keep their stuff clean, or less efficiency at other things).

We can build those gigantic ships to move our garbage around the globe, how much does it cost to move a person around? They take more space, need amenities; I know all this, you can find a hundred arguments, food? Water? Space? Whatever, I'm sure that for less than 500$ a month you can bring someone anywhere on earth, on a trip they'll enjoy even if it is simple; having a comfortable room is one thing, having a luxury suite is another. People have been doing it for a long time, encasing themselves 20 in a container and surviving without paying a cent. I know some have been dying and living in misery beyond imagining but my point is that I'm sure we can build travel ships with adequate amenities; food, water, shit tanks, of quality metallurgy and cute at it, pretty forms are not supposed to be an obstacle to efficiency, quite the contrary in a good reality, and logically too, music, color, mathematics, everything is form, did I already said that?

We can make all kind of people's ships, but the rich possess the oceans, and they divided the earth in country competition, army ships and submarines are dancing in tension everywhere along with rusted tankers that may still be good for a few more runs, unscrupulous bandits with AK 47 appear in the night, international tension sandwiches you, but these problems are not for the rich. As for the risky transports, remove a lot of that, mainly what is older, and you remove a lot of risks, for the environment and for people, and you open other possibilities too, some newly opened by science. And a good ship can be optimized for other functions, even if you're always better starting from scratch with experience and science and engineers and necessary expertise.

The army that can produce a dozen frigates a day for the fun of sinking them in war, and for that we spend a lot of resources and produce a lot of pollution, even if the military don't throw its garbage overboard. I know that for impotent people suffering from a complex of inferiority hidden behind their absolute powerful human control machines, an army is a necessity to show their might, unless another big baby takes over their liberty wonderland...And their bitching in war tension competition of who is the strongest and who should fear the other or defend with the biggest destructive power that can be created is a fraction of the cost they impose to humanity. Sorry, it's just me that sometimes think those power hungry governments defend the most retarded mentalities around and are a tremendous evolution limiter. My point is; army ships are fast, fun and they can carry hundreds of people, why can't we make civilian ships like that without all the armaments? Maybe not top comfort, but still a trip many can appreciate, me the first.

The same for planes carriers, they are worth a whole city in exploitation, production and pollution, remove the war stuff and surely we can build an ocean floating bases, slowly patrolling beacons that any ship can visit and trade with, stop to take a jog or watch a movie, or it could be made a relief ship for difficult land situations, carrying a panoply of copters for all kind of uses, heavy machinery and supplies. That's just an idea, but the justifications to build a floating city (not a luxury island for the rich) are better than "defense" or "killing", as long as it's a worthy investment. If chemists, chemists? I think it's the first time I use that word, if they find ways to transform most wastes on the spot...

For simple ferries, I'm sure we can easily have ships carrying 500 people in for whatever length of time at a low price. But doing so would bring to the light the ridiculous inflated price of basic lodging in this reality. A lot of people would start living permanently on ships giving a hard time to the idea of nationalism... This is because the total for lodging, and basic services on land should be far less than 500$ a month! Take your calculator and for a building that lasts 40-50 years add and add and add and you will have some damn big spending to do to go over 500$! The reason for this is that lodging is an industry to make a profit, a building will end-up profiting 5-10 times its initial value, and you won't change that, everything have been adjusted and condemned by profiteers and manipulators, and the same with ships. Evidently, people will immediately suppose the alternative is socialist lodging, like there is no way to patent things with competence, only competition has the adequate budget and mentality, governments are too cheap or incompetent... I guess that's why there is an infection of cheap buildings that will just pollute the décor in a few years, or pollute by being junk building, it's the alternative, and since the construction mafia is well associated with many politicians, we are not done with crap buildings.

As for ships, governments and companies almost only spend money on naval building yards to build container and military ships, and if there is not a rich man to pay for the building of a luxury liner so they can turn in big profits and get back their investment fast and start making money over the top of their head, or if there is no one to ask for a personal yacht, they'll simply let the yard stop production and close. Besides, what would you do with people running and living everywhere they wish around the globe? How would you control and exploit them? How do you and who tax them?

This is a simplified example of another limitations this reality condemns its people to, one of its many limitations built on profiting, lack of equilibrium, and country competition. In a well associated reality, where the people decide, they could have judged it appropriate to try a fleet of long range trans-oceanic passenger ferry ships to explore how this adds-up to the world and judge and deal with the problems arising from the new transportation way (why do ferry ships are only made to cross rivers? Country competition, and they are government's thing, other transportations have been made a business out of and those don't do good ferrying people all over the place, they only ferry people for big profits). If the new way of transportation ends-up too costly for the effect, then apart from the experience and knowledge, it will bring a whole new dimension to their lives; they will grow with the responsibilities they took, they will be able to say "we" not "they".

I think it's possible to explore the world in sense without ruining ourselves, without paying for and going through security hassles, without country competition, racism and indoctrination risk. Personally, I'm not strong on pure sightseeing and bars, neither visiting quaint zoos of cultural stagnation, I prefer more constructive traveling, that's in part why I believe an international language is important, even if a secondary language is the priority, for better understanding between people and cultural protection; you got to learn to communicate with everybody as well as learn a secret language to communicate between friends, that way association is far easier. Security, traveling and communication ability are part of the ideal situation we need so we can explore and learn about the world to know if we individually wish more specific ways or places to spend some of our energy on, maybe even live there. Basing our opinion from tourism idealization, ignoring the misery, is sure not the best way to know a place or a people. Growing a consciousness or investing only when a cataclysm hit or the army publicizes the place is not super hot either...

I want to walk my planet so I walk humanity, I want to talk anywhere I go so I talk humanity. If I didn't have better things to do I would want to go to your place, taste your fire food, unless it is made with insects, rice or raw, and know your ways of life and what I can do to make things better, because that's how I made myself, I don't visit people who don't try to get better or who don't dream of the stars. Why do you think I'm writing? To make things better, whatever you may think the contrary... I want to hear about the terrain around your place, show me your river, your sunset, make me feel the land that makes you sweat, the sand the soil, the foliage, the fear you have for your animals, the care you'd want to provide them, the taste too, evidently...Tell me the history of the lands and the one of the people, the temperature, how you like your place, if it is a good environment to live in, if your people are healthy. I know people who like your place too, what do you think of it? How is education? Would you live elsewhere? And if you had no choice? Tell me what revolts you too, but don't talk too much about your personal day to day problems, I've got enough of mine, particularly if it's ego reality related misery since I find it everywhere I go and I fight the reasons behind it all. But I may still want to know your modern environment, your "culture" or ways, what attaches you to this place emotionally? Is it the carnival of the homosexual pride? (Remember what I said about misplaced or inflated pride and manipulators? So to skip me poking a little use the right term "homosexual acceptance", not pride.) Historical buildings? Let me see your imagination, what do you visualize around your place? What do you want to make it better? Do you see a unique city? You prefer ghettos? Do you see yourself integrating your homes in nature with trail transportation? Or do you like fresh rooms along tunnels running under the desert? Draw me the paradise of your place, in sense, you know gold buildings are a stupidity, too much pollution is bad, you know love is important, fairness, principles, that you must associate with other people to decide things that concern them.

Another thing that can be a handicap to better association and development of differences, is to overly complexify important things that everybody does or like doing in the same way. As you know, I see the mind under a constant optimization process, and there are many things that can stop its evolution. One of those is to overwhelm it with useless complexity in matters of basic living (we should try to separate what's critical and what's not, even if both seems to work from the same part of the brain; the brain of life took a million years to make). This reality does exactly the contrary, to the point of making their understanding dependent from education indebting, just so people lose the capacity to question the subject. If a system is too complex then you lose the capacity to judge it adequately, to the point that it can look like magic or a worthless subject. Then you'll tell me I should trust the opinion of people who don't understand what they're talking about? I'm not talking art here, or entertainment, or programming, or quantum science, I'm talking the system, money, politics, law, making these things too hard to understand is an enslavement to ignorance. But I guess the more complex it is the more I'm supposed to be either impressed or overwhelmed by it, and the more I'm supposed to be resigned to work for the ones who make it work so they can control me better and use me as their indirect tool. Something like that but actually a lot worse. My mind will lose much of its global strength in many ways through useless complexities, and among these will be the difficulty of forming an adequate judgment of the reality fast enough to be self-directed and ready for bigger decisions and actions as an adult around 25, the age at which I'm supposed to be able to call myself a complete and independent human (individual).

This reality is so overloaded in senseless complexities and PMBBD that I have a hard time believing someone can be called an adult before 30, and that's far too old. But the profiting mind is at 16 and pushing for less, profiteers want humans ready for war and sex with adults as soon as possible, and to prevent them from questioning reality by embarking them as soon as possible. I could call this pedophilia of the mind, profiting from innocence at its extreme, and it should be a crime. 18 was the reaching of adulthood in old Queen and Kings Epoch, you didn't have as much stuff to learn at that epoch and the reality was far less complex.

You must think, observe and judge the reality and implement in yourself those conclusions you reach and act in function of these. You must understand the reality you live in, and if it made itself a hell of a complexity to force you to skip your independent judgment, then to hell with your contribution and take as much time as you need; you have to do it, and choose some paths that are important or that make more sense to you and stand for it. And in my opinion, stealing this from people by whatever means is an absolutely good justification to spill blood, and you're better be doing it than becoming a tourist and trying to profit from life.

The more a mind is stuck it is in its worthless complexities (language conflict, contorted and crisscrossed philosophy of life, governing structure, monetary system etc...), the more superficial it will be, particularly if using PMBBD, mix that with godly religions filling spiritual "gaps", and the mind will never get out of its conflicting state in itself and between generations, never truly finding equilibrium from stability of direction of mentality which can only be attained through the minimization of PMBBD and maximization of truths.

With maximum PMBBD and emphasis on technological change and sexual divergence as mental evolution, "evolved" governments only need to make slight adjustments over periods of 10 years to keep the illusion of evolution and change. Add that to more garbage, dependences and a selection of many more other tools, and an emphasis on "wow", "new", "flash" and "smile" people, and governments can keep control in all areas of almost anybody's life.

The governments of an "inferior" culture will have less diversity in frivolities to keep people's brains scrambled, less pyramids, but such areas will usually get under the control of violent armed factions, drugs cartels and religious manipulators. It may look no better but in fact their intellectuality is stronger; if they are not totally submitted to a religion, then they are more likely to gang and fight to death for their belief, and you wouldn't ask that of a population under Democratic control...The best you'll get are divided gangs of protesters submitted to the police, big mouths brandishing liberty slogans at a predetermined date, doing things calm and peaceful, a walk in the park of their wonderful future paradise that they are making, or at worst they'd cough some tear gas, or get red on pepper spray, or get a sound blast, or a lightning strike or a rubber bite, the old "stick" strategy that evolved; my parents had that at school, they transmitted some to me, cops got it at their belt, psy got it in their books and pills, publicists through communication, singers through paroles, armies through their weapons, it's called manipulation and it is violence whatever the way it is done, and that is unbelievably costly and negative in all kind of ways, but people can't see it since they have never been free of it (people manipulation tools).

A culture should be a planetary invitation to different ways, not a reclusive competitive entity where you see other like yourself as competitors or invaders, where you try to import those who can bring a maximum of money or workforce so you keep on the pressure selection we've been doing from the beginning of time. Then when you're so over the top with tax payers that natural forests only exist in a zoological way to protect it you close the doors and only accept tourism that brings money.

The current country competition makes it impossible for humanity to find its best way, and with it comes the monetary system, the war system and absolutely everything of this reality. The top of the pyramid of country competition should be composed of the biggest countries with the strongest ego drive or, if you prefer, with the biggest difference between the rich and the medium to poor, with the strongest conflicting brain philosophies, biggest military, while globally staying functional for the illusion that things are good enough.

The only way out of this I see is to get another realities thriving. This reality must put its energy in the birthing of a new reality along with a "main" equilibrium structure based on global judgment with a dynamic fair land separation system for realities, with resource equivalence to number of people. Trade as the choice of the cultural race and those are protected as long as they follow fairness principles and provide a fundamental set of human rights seen as a basis that define the form of the reality. Cultural races are bubbles on the planet, no more countries, no more borders, and you guessed it, no war is possible here, resolution of conflict comes from the same entity possessing nothing that shifts resources; the global equilibrium structure.

If some of you are scared of this start at something, you have reasons to be because I was an inch from invalidating the so sought after indispensability of governments the way I was going! But it is not the time for that yet...

Indispensability, thinking about it I almost thought the general idea made sense, that nobody is indispensable or everybody is expendable. But again and as always, my brain seems to support a very different vision of what is generally projected, more like the contrary, but you're starting to know me; I'm an independent individual so I'm hard on gang principles. Probably the reason why some push the view that everybody is expandable is to devaluate them on the whole pyramidal system and make it more invincible until anybody can run the business, in expendable ideal theory... While a lot of people can accept things this way, if you don't confound interdependence with indispensability, the fact remains that most rich come to believe they are indispensable one way or another, and you can bet they want an expendable population...

This is another class separation manipulation bullshit, and one indirect effect is to produce more "depression". Even without this, our worth as unconscious "feeling" is getting lower because there are too many people on the planet, so you can bet pride is a life saver in this reality. I believe mental human health is, among other things, proportional to population (depending on brainwash, like the gregarine animal thing); If only a few billions people were living on earth, they would feel they are more important and indispensable, and "depression" would be lower (in the best of realities).

I'm sure the quantity of people on the planet has an influence not only on our moral but in the way we act too, too many or too little and we act differently. The other byproduct observation of this, when added to other factors, is that we are not as sociable as we are pushed to think we are, but I already talked about independence that got a tendency to be proportional to mind abilities, and this can be reinforced by living in an advanced society. I personally don't much need socialization, but I definitively need to know there are people I can exchange with at some point. Like in many things, it is the exaggeration that is bad, like total competition. So more people is more money, more tax, a bigger "economy", we must get used stepping on each other's feet, and that's just a facet, I'm not talking about mass standardization; some really want to create ants humanity and it is not a joke, maybe that's why they like pyramids so much... I don't think heavy sociability is a good thing for an advanced society, particularly for exceptional people, I believe in the middle line, from time to time, unless things slip in survival mode. The exception is a loving couple that can be seen as a whole separated entity, even if it still involves some level of socialization ability, particularly with children. Personally, a social situation once or twice a week is my ideal, like a BBQ with friends, beyond that is a tolerance matter like a job, 6 hours a day at that would be my equilibrium point, and you can bet I wouldn't end my day in a bar.... I think I can bring a lot from that, but more would have a bad effect on my attitude, I'm sure of that. And I don't consider exchanging messages as socialization; I talk about the contact and continual decoding thing.

With a maximum ego, nationalism, racism and PMBBD, you can limit the negative mental effect of overpopulation by giving people the impression that they are superior, the future, that only them exist, that the world is dependent from them, or that overpopulation comes from another race or country that must be competed, controlled or killed, it is the other races that make too much babies, so let's compete or hate it. So the responsibility is mostly thrown down one or the other pyramid; the race pyramid, the money pyramid, the country pyramid or whatever, while you continue making babies, mostly out of arguments that don't make sense. You are trying to justify your lost feeling of indispensability, with an end result that will grow global population to lower it still more. That's how deep in it we are...You can't do anything to counteract this by working on the true problem in this reality, so you must absolutely stay nationalist, competitive, ego, manipulated, etc. unless people become suicidal or insane from breaking their brainwash of a view of liberty. But don't worry the psy, the pharmaceutical industry, group therapy, religion, murder, or this guru or that, can easily totally eliminate suicide and depression, as a proof that things are getting better...

Everybody wants and needs to be indispensable and a reality that makes expendable people will live doom in the worst possible fashion because it's a fundamental feeling in people; steal that for them and you'll have displaced frustrations under an incomprehensible brothel of forms. People will always find all kind of tricks, contortions and displacement effects to feel indispensable, and when they'll have nothing to turn to, they'll make babies; take that away from them and they'll rot but work anyway, just barely able to breath, but making and joining gangs to feel more indispensable, increasing interdependence condemnation.

When there will be only two people on earth, will we say they're indispensable or expendable? If you want to treat people humanly you have to treat them as indispensable, and you can't do that without seeing people as independent individuals. Cool! Sorry but that doesn't apply to this reality. This reality is almost done, a hundred years is all what is needed to finish it and probably we won't survive that long, but our tomb will be built. And you know very well how I see the tangent of its creation, nobody will make me believe things are better than ever (in some aspect yes, and you can pass your life looking only at these aspects). You may think it may be an advantage to your reality if everybody became unique and indispensable but no, it wouldn't work, it would only cause catastrophic troubles, besides, individualism is bad, people are even bullshitted to confound it with egocentrism! Anyway, the most ego people have their ideal reality, the best manipulators and profiteers have all they want, why would they change that? And they got every tools and arguments in their indispensability to make you feel expendable.

Calculating one's human value toward good or evil in term of his true indispensability in a fair system would turn this world upside down. Imagine how life would be hard for the most ego people, they would get a normal pay for working like everybody else! So it won't happen particularly since many of them can make themselves indispensable in all kind of evil hypocrite ways, while there is a continual systematic flow of indispensable replacements... and the system needs them to continue, it is even dependent from the most evident ones; prostitution, hells angels (mafia), street gangs, religions, sects and many more distributing PMBBD, they are all necessary parts of this reality; you wouldn't believe how many "good" people fill their pockets with them...

And how would you go at it anyways? Go out with a sing "I'm indispensable to politicians, as a sex worker, take that into consideration in my salary!" It wouldn't work; the police would arrest you for disturbing mental weirdness. And it doesn't work like that anyway; you need a system where it's people who decide what is most important to them, in part. And you can talk about it all you want on the internet but the best you'll do is to create another pressure group that will be studied for years to come as to how to twist its view to fit and eventually profit from its implementation; your wish will become one amongst the thousands of divided groups already there for the fighter protestor to spend his energy or frustration or even his life on. The way it will eventually be implemented, after years of crying, will twist the original principle to a parody of it. With some associated efforts you can still get some promises of concessions as long as there is an election coming, but it is still always the same; protest groups are like beggars pointing for attention to an unstable brick on the pyramid... Next, what you don't know is that many of those "unstable bricks" exist solely for diverting the attention of people, channeling them away from thinking too profoundly or to prevent them from doing true harm to the structure, while rich gangs continue to take the means to live in luxury as long as they can. Anyway, if you want to brandish slogans you're supposed to do it for a sports team only, it is your culture, and drink beer damnit, it's good for acting unconsciously, hate the other team, create some rivalry over insignificant differences, become expendable and let big daddy be indispensable!

I'm just messing around with concepts, but everything starts like that, indispensability is a vast and relative notion, and there is always a value of it in any reality, like responsibility. In fact the 2 concepts are kind of closely related...You could say that an adult human having a negative indispensability, not gotten out of bad luck, is not supposed to wear the human title and there are many of them. So don't worry, we'll never get our global indispensability calculated, they'll say it is inhuman and make a law against it, and a pub campaign. Yet, I will add that it cannot be precisely known or calculated, it is a variable notion in all its forms and equality of indispensability doesn't exist. As for human personal feeling of indispensability, it is somewhat proportional to the number of people on the planet and must be associated to every facets of human life that can be given a worth or value. Indispensability can be separated in many spheres but its final value is global; it is a total thing either in the positive or in the negative.

Everything looks good like that but this description is a perfect ground to get ego dreamers to profit from it, and that's what is being done in this reality; some gangs tries to control a sphere of knowledge or skills to become indispensable or keep an edge in whatever competition. They mostly end-up far from it because the size of an ego (in reality, not in imagination) has a negative effect on indispensability. You may grow your ego by getting more indispensable, but as you do, your indispensability gets lower. As it is the case with many things, there is an equilibrium point to be found here, even if that can be hard to judge.

The ideal would be a system that slowly morphs, yes that can exist, to give a value to different facets of indispensability and responsibility, to ultimately get a "relatively fair" changing formulae of work value. I'll concede it's a bit complicated and utopist, so let's say I'll be happy to simply have people judge the value of different actions, like jobs, in fact, with enough time doing it you could end-up with a very complex algorithm of these things, made simple through a computer interface, but always easily understood fundamentally. Indispensability is the true ground of serious competition and, as humanity is the final (lose innocence and modify reality) step of life on this planet, you are indispensable to humanity and life.

A politician in a position of authority is an incredibly costly thing; he represents authority (the "god" system, isn't he supposed to represent the people?) and he's not worth much if he's just a façade. He is in a position of authority, and in the mind of people it means he's supposed to be able to take decisions in favor of the betterment of masses, minimally. People give them tons of means for that, means which are associated to responsibility as much as indispensability, but they have some of the worst value of indispensability when all facets of spending for their effect are taken into consideration, which can include removing the system they made to stay indispensable. You may think they are indispensable to the evolution of humanity and life, but it's absolutely not the case. Indispensability to a political structure or a pyramid is a small thing, and can even be a very negative thing, beside the end value of indispensability to humanity, to good ideals and particularly to life. If politics is an obstacle to such goals, you will raise your good value fantastically by going over or eliminating that obstacle. But in the end, everybody should think of their indispensability to humanity and life, even though everything must pass by the building of civilization.

To be indispensable to humanity and life, we need to be capable of dropping or replacing some of our creations; if we see a creation making more sense, or a potentially better ideal, we must be fair and help if it can become reality. This is a critical facet of being indispensable toward life; our ability to develop good possibilities and doing things in their best way. If we don't do that we become indispensable to facets of life at best, not life itself. Upon death, human personal indispensability totally loses its value; it absolutely cannot be transferred to someone else since it is individual under that form, but another indispensable person may take the place and do an indispensable job to society or reality or group or whatever. For a spiritual view, I could say that once you die, the indispensability you had in life becomes a big factor in the impossibly complex calculation of your contribution to history and that can be any negative or positive value applied globally.

Among these factors are the "first" value and "only one" value, your capacities, your destiny, all the different forms your ego took, fairness, truth, your vision of things, your consciousness level, your day to day actions, your attitude toward globality, all the different limitation you developed and why, your history, etc. I could go on adding many more and decorticating them all for a flabbergasting never ending description of what you truly are and your true effect on history; you can manipulate hide, PMBBD, select, you can do all you can to modify or use history to your own end, but in the end, history is always the absolute truth of things, and the "inside story" of history is all what's going on inside your mind and what you do with it to make history. Finally, human indispensability cannot be compared to material indispensability even if it's the kind of indispensability an ego reality would accept of people and life.

That brings me to the first one and only one. The first one is mostly a competitive value, while the only one is mostly a creative value. Such factors should be added to basic high consciousness life value and other indispensability factors from which an ideal monetary system can spring from, I'll throw the basics of such a system later. For now, these factors are closely associated to destiny and life goals too (survival, loss of innocence and morphing reality). If you seek to be in harmony as much as possible with your destiny, then we are talking about the indispensability of your destiny among other factors, but if you don't care about destiny, then find how you can be as indispensable as possible in your judgment of things, or follow the global judgment of others to have an idea, because indispensability is not a fixed thing but a dynamic one. If everybody is submerged by food, then that facet of survival loses some indispensability value. It can be better or more profoundly explained, but all those points can be used to determine the high consciousness life value, and work value too.

The most indispensable people are highly creative people who do unique and difficult things first in history, who have the greatest positive effect to life and humanity while having the minimum negative effect (through all related interdependences, which can be ego related). And this negative effect, in the ideal view of money, must be taken into consideration when judging the monetary worth of the work done by someone whatever the job. This negative effect, like the positive one, is a memory value; it is permanent and cumulative; even if the person changes, his history is not changed, yet, time and personal changes can easily invalidate the worth of old negative things in the calculation of present and future worth. The worth of such negative actions is another hard thing to judge in this reality, but in another reality it can easily be done and applied as a variable to work value because it is not skills that do a job; it is a whole human being with a history.

That's why a vision of good and evil is important; do you want pedophiles taking care of children or making scientific studies of them? No you don't. I won't say skills are unimportant, they are critical, but if you want only skills to do a job then create robots. Your effect in reality is a total, there is not two of you who must be judged separately, even if ego people like to have their value solely be calculated from a few facets, and only the positive ones, glorified preferably. Your true value toward life's advancement is a total of every actions you do continually as a living high consciousness being, your person is one, this is the ideal view, one that is sure not realist for this system that decorticates everything to facets to create gods of this and that to get admired for the hyped facet.

Your work cannot be separated from your life, if you want to separate work from life then build robots. And there is nothing wrong with robotization, it is even a goal of humanity; we must robotize as much as we can until there is almost only creativity left as a job and work for the fun of it, that's the ideal, but our first principle is always fairness; never encourage or defend a system that enforces unfairness, if it does, you did not do your job well or for good reasons; people must be comfortable, even if they don't have a job, and it is evident that the ones removing comfort from others are the problem, nobody needs luxury, luxury is for when everybody that is worth it or has the capacity is comfortable, then some can live in luxury, but for as long as this situation is not true then the farthest you can go is living at a high standard, which may include some luxuries, but not as a lifestyle. If you refuse to understand this simple vision then you are either a fucking moron and you should not have that much means, or squarely evil for refuting your negative effects on others, but you can see it as a lack of empathy if you want, or psychopathy. And any good action you'll do will be bullshit to manipulate glorify your image, the truth of you is revealed by living in luxury or stashing senselessly while there are people struggling to live comfortably, no argument will hide this fact from you, and the more you'll bullshit others that you're good or fair or empathic or philanthropist the more thoroughly I'll crush you. As a matter of fact, there is this saying that we systemized unfairness exactly for that reason, for some of us to live in luxury, like people think of that when they work, how practical and twisted, I wonder who spread this...But yes, it's a matter of ideology, what drives humanity, and here everything must be patented so we envy, in hype if necessary, so we embark in the competition until it's proven psychologically that the human is like this and like that, everything is as it should be...

Furthermore I give added value to someone that is exemplary in many facets of his life, particularly love, and while a specific specialization can be very valuable, a hyped skill for entertainment is not among my priorities. For now we develop expensive gods from people with a skill that are far from worth it, particularly when all facets of their lives are taken in consideration, even if a certain percentage is rewarded adequately, yet, the most important and lasting positive creative work is more often than not badly rewarded, when they're not squarely exploited. I like exemplary people, good people, and I want them to thrive, so I need another reality for this, one where the pressure selection will encourage the development of a human as a whole under its best form, because to me that's what's most valuable, not your little person, not your marvel, the success of solar life in the universe.

Now, it is one thing to know you should have a vague idea of your indispensability toward life as a person and associate it to some value, but to start somewhere with the money you got to have an idea of the indispensability worth, among other things, of a job being done within the reality's schema of priorities, which includes indispensability to the time saving aspect of specialization or expertise. That's the minimum, and you guessed it, these value are totally made senseless by control and competition ego groups in this reality who like it very much to condemn a job with themselves just so they can ask for more money. The problem here is that jobs must be automated until only creative or fun jobs are left to end-up turning the economy on the people and paying people to better develop themselves toward an ideal. It means we must emphasis and specialize and decompose and fragment jobs to make them available to a maximum of people. You don't do jobs for the sake of having a job, you do jobs to gain forever more personal independence, to eventually spend your time the way you want, to care for yourself the way you want, to reach ideals. Presently a lot of the less valuable and unimaginative jobs are often among the most rewarded, and there is the standards of reality that further messes things-up by forcing people to work long hours at boring or hard manual jobs instead of dividing the workload, it's a result of complexity and cheapness, this reality wouldn't dare make 2 person comfortable if it can use one person for the same effect. It's all a matter of goals, and the goal here is sure not to leave people their independence or time as much as possible...

You could ask yourself which job is most valuable to civilization, the future, or life. Sure that if your civilization don't have food, you're better make growing food more valuable for now, but knowledge for future previsions and science is more valuable because of the worth of food it will provide, you will make less costly mistakes too.

You can be the first one to do something or the best one at doing it but it doesn't mean you're to be treated like a god. Einstein was the first and only one at doing some things, but what truly made him a valuable man was his creativity. Yet, if he had not been born, someone else would eventually have made his discoveries. That doesn't invalidate the indispensability value because it ends up as a historical thing, making everybody indispensable to some extent, but maybe the "god" of intelligence value that has been assigned to him is a bit overrated. He may have been lucky to have found his destiny and to have been given the means to live it to the end, but maybe if the reality had better priorities someone else could have made his discoveries 100 years earlier.

Or you could see it that way too, for those who never end boasting the superiority of their race and language; it is logical that the ones having unfair means can invest more in research, creating an infinite wheel of unfairness; there may have been a thousand people that could have developed as an Einstein if the means were separated fairly, or if that many young people were seen as more indispensable and didn't die in wars (don't forget an adult is a very big investment for life, yes an investment, and wasting people (except evil) for whatever reason in whatever way (like suicide) while you can do otherwise is the greatest sin you can manage to get responsible for). Next, it is guaranteed that the one that discovered fire could be lighted, probably permitted the whole human civilization to persist, why don't we boast him like a god? So it's a bit ridiculous to boast every discovery that has been made where light is involved on the back of Einstein, saying Wow! We're lucky Einstein existed! Like he invented light. It applies to businesses like Coca-Cola or M.C.-Donald he too, brandishing Coca-Cola collection bottles every five years in the name of the company that survived that many years, like the USA culture will die if the cola business shuts down, we must do everything to keep it an eternal hegemony unless the system crash and people lose their mind and revolt form losing their culture.

Furthermore, if you are to involve fairness in all that, then you got to take into consideration country and language competition. English people will always make more discoveries since their means include the U.S., Canada, U.K, Australia and more, that's a lot of means to boast English superiority (or is it supremacy)... Means taken from others limiting them, like Canada exploiting resources all over or making reserves out of different cultures, and you can bet that these cultures are unlikely to develop space travel because of the situation they are forced to. When you can you import all the geniuses you can find around too, while many countries got "leadership" that only think of exploiting "their" population and investing in weaponry limiting the minds of the people there.

I'm definitively not saying that to discredit English people of their brains, they had the best attitude to win the ego competition game after all...As for Einstein, he had a great value in his time but he was not a god dwelling in absolute truth, so all he said and theorized is open to critics from anybody, even me; and I might do just that to have a little fun. Defending his theories with all our might, any exception we find, may mix up our whole vision of the universe or particularly life, furthermore, he was a changing person like everybody, so I'm sure that with current data he would change many of his views, and didn't the guy believe there is an intelligence process to all creation.

I know science has a tendency to be quite methodological at monopolizing subjects, or set the parameters of what is acceptable theorizing, when they don't close doors to imagination and creativity spheres altogether with the theories that better fit their certitudes or mathematics, but maybe they should be more open to new ideas because it may be possible they're basing too much from old visions, trying to make everything fit, or their formulas could be mistaken and their fantastic extrapolations could eliminate a lot of valid alternatives. It's like their vision of fundamental matter that always end-up wrong, why? Because they were mistaken and now they got to build a new particle accelerator, but the strange thing is that it changes nothing to their fundamental vision of the universe, because instead of questioning it, they'll defend it by invent something new that can be proven with extreme difficulties to make things fit, or they'll find a way to enlarge a variable in their formulas to make things fit, and me when I try to participate as a normal guy with ideas I'm immediately rejected, and you wouldn't dare tell them they forgot to explain why absolutely everything spins in their vision of the universe, kind of a big evident thing, but so much of a taboo it seems that you're not worth an answer, it doesn't exist, they have an answer on anything but not even a comment on that super evident aspect of all matter in the universe...And me I must close my mouth and endorse their vision or it's a proof that I understand nothing, they can't be wrong, they have diplomas, they have grants, jobs, an inflated vocabulary, I can't compete, and alternative possibilities have all been explored they think. Like spiritual people think all spirituality have been developed, like philosophy people think all philosophy have been invented... So they shouldn't be surprised if I treat them a little harshly. Many formulas scientists are so found on using to describe many phenomenon are wrong at best, and many scientists who like to boast believing in god is stupid are not better by believing in theories that are as stupid, like the folding space time thing, which is supposed to be possible thanks to a formulae from Einstein, the same for rewinding time, proven possible thanks to a formulae from Einstein...

But I'll give you that I didn't have time to go to school and learn how to make formulas from tons of formulas, something that I respect greatly, truly, Einstein was a great physicist mathematician and those are forever too rare. And sorry if I'm less interested in his work, but I'll need to explain myself something about the turning, because it seems nobody noticed the earth spins and turns around the sun and it doesn't affect no science shit about the universe, and it's not me that has a word to say about it...

As for knowledge, it should and could easily be made available to everybody, with some exceptions, but this reality has no choice to control a lot of knowledge as everything is a competition for profits, and a lot of knowledge is truly better be controlled by the better among the bad...Knowledge can take many forms and we must definitively not hide it, destroy it, twist it or appropriate it unless it takes material form, it must be seen as a free basis accessible to all human beings if you are to make things fair.

The truth exists to be told and develop, unless you're an enemy of life, and justifiable exceptions to this are very rare, except in this reality where there is no way to do things in their best fashion. Creativity, entertainment, technology, skills, they are not used in their best way, they are mostly controlled and possessed by gangs that never end manipulating and hiding stuff to stash money and live lives nobody are worth living (on earth) and surely not them, and they know it.

Creativity in this reality ends-up controlled and exploited by all kind of gangs competing against each other over it. It is under profitability pressures, it is manipulated to be a competition in protection and hiding paranoia, a money making industry, we create senseless and in a hurry in the name of profits, even if it's a risk to humanity, the mind, or life. Just think of genetic engineered thrown planetary wide for an example, or the way we are affecting the mind with creative bullshit for another.

So while the ones playing with the money get rich, the ones really doing the most useful creation work is most often than not around the bottom, even exploited when possible. It's the competition of the best manipulators and profiteers, so it's logical that those who don't use their brains toward such goals are less rewarded, like people who compose song for singers, programmers for companies, computer artists, inventors, thinkers, etc, etc. A good creative mind that brings new knowledge or that eases the life of masses or is highly appreciated, should be rewarded fairly which is, in the ideal situation, the highest pay available because he is he's the source, the creator and absolutely nobody would profit from his work if he wasn't there. The creator, not the exploiter or user, is always the most indispensable person in any group, and in the end he is the one that should profit the most from his creation (if you don't take into consideration negative factors). Evidently, creativity is heavily interrelated and interdependent these days, the lone inventor is a rare sight, and this will be more so as civilization advances, still, the principle hold true, creation is what's valuable, not profiting, but in this reality, most creativity is manipulated or exploited to profit people who got profiting as creativity...

What's funny is that often we will spend billions to make a discovery, while someone else will make an equivalent in worth discovery at a thousand buck price. This will always be to some extent, but it is particularly drastic in this reality. Unless your goal is competition and profitability, the "patent" way of doing thing is far from ideal too. Rare are those who make a living out of a patent, inventors are rarely the best paid persons with a patent to protect their inventions, the same for people who make wonderful programs. For those who don't work while they create, they are forced to live off a loan, a grant or social assistance. Some even end up feeling indebted to society for a mostly cheap standard of living. Then, if they only want to create and not become an industrial, they sell production rights to someone with the means and get a small percentage on units sold if they are lucky.

Yes you can use the same argument for all those money stashers who profit like crazy from creativity by saying; "you have to stash money if you are to have enough to produce the thing", what can I say, it is the way of this reality! We can't do otherwise because we never saw control as anything else than a godly thing! If one person (someone that got a veto on things inside a gang) can't control things for whatever reasons, then they are separated into parts and control is given to another godly gang.

The result is a spreading of separated stashes of money everywhere that are mainly used to pay the fantastic salaries of the bosses and the pyramid tip for a gang, while making it an impossibly unfair competitor, and you are condemned to pass by it. You don't have a choice to pay them everything they want because they control a stash of money, they got the means. And that still doesn't prevent most of them from plunging their hands in it so much their godly egos is big; as soon as there is a safe way to profit from it without getting caught, or while keeping a good image, they're at it. And if you think most of them are easily caught, you're mistaken; you have to pay fatly the counterproductive inspectors (useless in the best of realities) that are in contact with such people unless they find the envelope of money given to them too tempting...

Every creation sphere is controlled and exploited by such money stashers and again, that encourages a pressure selection and separation of people. Oh! He "takes care" of a hundred creators? It is easy, when you have control of so much means, to take possession of creativity by buying it from people who are right in their minds to want to relax while creating, and make a fair living out of it. They want a living, not a grant, they don't want to be thrown some little change you're making with their creativity, and the same for many scientists who work under pressure to give results.

In the extrapolated situation of a fully developed and successful civilization, a lot of production and transformation work can be eliminated, no need for anybody (except the creator) to profit monetarily from creation particularly when judgment is not possessed by some gangs. But I may debate and argument as much as I can, I definitively cannot dismantle the strongest and most profound best adapted to this reality structure, it's like trying to replace the wheels of a car with triangles.

So, since producers and the likes control creativeness and got a stash of money to care for, they are among the most paid with some exceptions, mostly stage artists. It is a very simplistic view of things but if I am to finish with this subject, I've got to concentrate on the gist of it. In this reality, along with a maximal pay to control ego, we should have been able to find a simple mathematical formulae to determine the maximum pay of producers work, like taking the same percentage off the revenues each creative person brings, to keep an adequate stash and, according to their work value, the different workers in the production chain (pyramid) get their pay calculated from the average revenues brought by all the creators they exploit. Something like that. In my way of seeing things, there shouldn't be people stashing money beyond self needs, only different ones with everybody concerned and using it independently connected to it. All that philosophy simply can't exist in this reality since communication is controlled for profits, and the market is based differently.

Next, if creative people want to stop because they want to take it easier or got enough money, then we should let them be, even dismantle the group profiting from them if only crappy ones are found after that. We are not supposed to be in a competition race to create fast before, before what? The rich dies? Before he's too old and his talent is lost? You can't lose talent when you do things in their best manners, when things are at their right place, like principles, and when you are minimally efficient at not wasting time, people are not supposed to be pushed or forced to produce creativity. This panic to profit from an exceptional skill that should not be is an unconscious fear.

Most creative people, if given a fair pay, will create for the fun of it, to impress, to help, to contribute etc. If they live in a reality that gives them a hard time they may start drinking or trying to escape reality or doing all kind of stupid things with their money, placing themselves in a situation where creating becomes a necessity or they "recycle" themselves.

And sometimes, we should have a look at the negatives feelings involved in creation too, think positive is no better than think negative and the best is think, medium? A lot of creation arises from bad feelings, I'm an example of that, more than you'll ever read about in my work, I try to give you the short version by writing what I think is the best part of it.

There is equilibrium in creation too, people create by themselves, mostly stuff everybody can appreciate, so we should always structure things to encourage creation, a bit as a competition, but surely not as a create or die manner. I know it works, in hell, but it's the worst way to do thing, in part because it pushes the human to develop badly, seeing everything and everybody as a competition to embark in the panic to get at the money, out of fear and party, while you got bloodsuckers everywhere trying to profit, with investors needing guarantees. We should encourages creativity more adequately and no need to enrich profiteers beyond measure to have the structure to make it reality, what we need is to develop associated groups of experts of all kind to permit high level creation, for them to surpass themselves, globally well associated science too can ease things, and a free learning structure is sure to have a generally better effect too.

A creative mind can permit the invention of more technology which in turn will permit better creation too, but this is supposed to be a slow process, not a panic creating forever deficient products you boast as diversity and evolution, and it should permit to observe the effect and tangent of creation over many years in reality and humanity, this is equilibrium while permitting most people to enjoy it. Creating for profits and manipulation is costly in all kind of ways, I won't repeat for a thousand pages, and the result will be the failure of solar life. The good way of doing things may be slower, probably not, but for it you need another growing and protected, not competed, reality where people can live comfortably while doing their things, which mean minimizing monetary hassles, surely not make of your life a hell out of monetary hassles, and yes I know many people of this reality enjoy developing the creative aspect of their mind for monetary hassle, it's becoming a genetic handicap, but there's a limit to what you can ask of a mind, you can't be an expert in everything, and that is valid for a whole species in the way it systematizes its environment, us, as a species in the universe, we are experts at ego competition, profiting and manipulation, or blatant stupidity when you consider the result, it's like the worst form of suicide in the universe...

If I make a useful and good invention, I want it to enter the homes of people, I want people to have it, I want the lives of the people to be made better without hassle. I don't live off a dynastic dream of ego like bell Canada do. If I had invented the telephone I would have given it to a nonprofit system of development, production and structuration (the job of government, or the bricks under it) and I would have asked my fair worth for the invention, and many are needed to be judge of that. One of the reasons for the existence of the government is to put it in every home and subtract a just amount from everybody's pays for the new basic service, refunding the spending over time if they're really cheap governments, then lowering the amount taken to just cover the cost of keeping the system well-functioning. That's how I see things, not as dependent from personal stashes or investors dreaming of making a business for maximum profitability to eternity with twenty competitors doing the same, exploiting far too much resources, polluting twice as much, for developing of all their different machines lasting a few years because they produce in a hurry, just in case there's competition. Innovation is not dependent from competition.

I see a service for what it is too; a service to civilization, something available to everybody, and anything that gives us an advantage, to some extent, should end-up in that category. The kind of creativity that changes the life of everybody positively is the most worthy, even if it is just from a little idea, and you don't want vampires turning around to use the new changes to make stashes and eternal dynasties out of it.

But all this competition has been made necessary by a reality that seek to market everything to profit from everybody, it is impossible to change this now, it's even in the mentality of people, the system works like that, everything interrelated and inter-adjusted; if you stop unneeded competition everything will go wild because people only thinking of profiting made competing monopolies everywhere to grow rich gangs and families hegemonies, and innovation would become very hard to implement; this reality made itself dependent from competition for innovation, and that's scary.

After prioritizing the importance of creative people, you must look at it in a global way too; a creation is a whole, creative people are the most important part but they are nothing without the past work of others and the production structure that will permit their work to enter people's lives if they want it (since you must not impose its publicity or put pressure). You must look at it as a whole creation structure, like in the situation of a game development team, with all kind of specific creators or specialists along the way paid mostly from competence and indispensability. Now, creation reaches its top when a team of specialization is formed, that way it can be considered as a creation of many people since all specialists become interrelated, they form a more complete and capable entity. Creative people become a "simple" part of the new entity, a specialization, his specialization may be given more worth, but that doesn't make him superior, except in his specialization, and you can be a superior specialist at bossing people around...Someone that made himself a specialist at something mental is critical to other specialists and time is limited for everybody so I surely won't say specialization is not important. But a part of job when you reach enough expertise, is to get yourself understood well enough, and trusted enough, so people act well, or say that they would have reached somewhat the same conclusions if they had the time, or life, to pass as much time studying or thinking, getting the expertise.

I should add for my own good that the recipe to make global ideals that can be transmitted and defended by people may be the rarest and hardest one, but still, the worst failure would be not trying to do what one have been made, or what he made himself, to do. If my unconscious tells me I should have the strength to go ahead, to fight for a possibility I believe good, then I believe I'm skipping my human responsibility if I don't do it.

Now, responsibility is a relative thing, and it is proportional to the wanted indispensability; most people not feeling indispensable will try to be by taking simple responsibilities. Generally, the less global capacity the simpler the responsibilities, and the more consciousness the more responsibilities too, and reward. The system and the story must make people feel indispensable in many ways right at the start; people are not cannon food, or profit sources. If you don't do it you cultivate innocence, and if you do it in a PMBBD soup of television, religions and sects bosses, you reap the responsibility of the wrong mentalities people develop, whatever it is from naturally refusing to invest a ridiculous amount of time seeking the truth, or revolting in all kind of displaced ways, or endorsing wrong philosophies, or adapting, to reality right from the start (just doing as asked or choosing a path that result in in adapted behavior), even building one's life around bad spirituality, etc. You are even responsible for my candid rejection of the whole kit of your reality if I find out it's my destiny to look into this, and I'm faced with an impossible task; why should I go half crazy? I'm as well do things in beauty and use my creativity to justify a remake of reality, as I crush you simply, just that should be more than enough complexity... That did rhyme didn't it? Sounds inadequate though; I'm sure it's bad for credibility, you don't ask experts to rhyme, politicians would be more entertaining however... The worse in that is that I did exactly what I did not want to do, explore the mountain of bullshit, but I guess I unconsciously always knew I'd have to do it, it goes with the job of my revolt, that's in part why I protected my candor for so long, not doing it I would be an important adult gone completely crazy, at least I've gone crazy in a satisfying way, just joking, I'm super sane, really. Understanding hell is unrealistic as a responsibility to be taken by everybody, yet, life and death and spiritual questions will always come back to nag you one day or the other, and not knowing if you're doing the best with your life will often throw you in a thinking large phobia that will conflict the wall of your most solid beliefs.

To finish this I'll say that if I were you I wouldn't look too closely at how we value work in this reality as you'll realize that the ego competition has destroyed all sense in it, whatever the angle you look at it. A producer of vegetables should be the best paid in his sphere of production whatever you divide the job in 3 specializations, the one that sew the jeans is supposed to be second, after the designer, most paid, definitively not the dealer or distributor or publicists or the one who bought the patent (concerning publicity, you don't need to have much "visibility" when a precise space is given for it (not thrown about everywhere and painted with PMBBD), if the product is good, a categorized space for pub is all is needed, you can even make a special television channel for it. Pushing and imposing people is another manner, but all that is totally against the mass production principle needed in this reality with twice too many people on earth). Even if it wouldn't work in this reality, eliminate surplus people and competition for profitability (most wars are under products of this, PMBBD too) then apply this mentality to have a chance at equilibrium. That should increase the value of most people and the right people at it, while devaluating it for a few ones...In the example of a small vegetables grower, he will be happy to take care of his piece of land, he will put more application in his work, and he may even wish to sell his vegetables himself. I said small producers because I prefer them to industrials, specialization is not always preferable and I like people with many manual and intellectual skills, it's good to keep the ability to learn alive, and people more fully developed appreciate life better and this has an effect all around them.

My last point is to say that we should take special care people doing laborious work nobody likes to do, appreciation of work should be a strong modifier of pay. And since this reality is not consistent with itself, there are people paid fortunes for something they like to do, a lot in entertainment, while many peoples do jobs they absolutely hate for a fraction of the cost. Since in this reality of profiteers people are supposed to pay for things they like to do, why don't we adjust thing a little? Politicians like so much their job they are ready to declare war to any country to keep it, so let's pay them minimum salary. Ah, but they'll all go corrupt (criminal)! Yes, that's how good they are, they need a gigantic salary and a life in luxury, unless they go corrupt! And it's still not enough for many... give such salary and luxury life to any criminal and it should be enough for him to behave "not criminally" don't you think? Some are ready to go to prison for 10 000$...

All my ways of thinking are in conflict with whatever form of "god" government, mainly the democracy capitalism business because it is the most condemning force inside this reality, but it seems the social communist style is worse, from what I hear around here, but I don't know, I don't hear from these places in a very positive way. I personally think the ideal was wrong from the beginning, and it further worsened as it fell under the will of dictators who indoctrinated their population to good principles twisted bad, like all governing gangs of an ego competition reality do, for the usual self-enrichment quest, or family hegemonies... You can bet the disinformation doesn't put competition as the reason why things go to hell, never, so what we are being told is that things developed badly by themselves freely, because of this or that thing they did wrong, each expert his conflicting view, but one thing's for sure, America didn't worsen things by competing it to death...It could have tried to help and make it work instead of spending trillions out of fear of a competitor, and forcing it to take the same attitude and spend its means as a paranoia too.

Anyway, instead of decorticating the PMBBD mess, I'm as well seeing china as a big colorful factory producing cheap things and people at the chain, and the soviets like an alien thing walking in dirty snow in a grey decor where you never know when you'll step on a nuclear something (what can I say, Chernobyl traumatized me like a bad horror movie that happened live, the exorcism was nothing besides this, I hope manipulators didn't scrap the movie and truth of it, since mistakes like that, even if you don't want them, have tremendous value of information, and you always need the most truth to learn well. As a matter of fact, the Canadian candu reactor that was seen as a big superior thing to sell all over the place is not much better, the experimental one that was built near 2 cities almost "exploded" (one city is just a few KM nearby, the other is in the usual wind, and it is built straight beside the St Laurence river, it's like they have chosen the best possible place to kill a maximum of people in case of meltdown, or is it Quebeckers in case of separation? The big secret?), the same place they experimented with mass anthrax production ending-up dumping it in the St Lawrence, not far from the place where the Canadian military experimented with massive dumping of military chemicals that quickly disappeared to end-up in drinking water killing thousands of people in cancer. I don't know why they don't do these things as far away from people as possible, particularly Quebec, the first and last French city in America. I have a hard time believing they throw a royal cent on the map of Canada and it lands near Quebec city, the city don't exist, or they never planned things. Sounds like the same kind of care first nations get, size proportional, the Canadian love way, making tons of money from mining uranium while poisoning the water of whole communities, then hiding the dead as best as it can, and you can bet they have other priorities with the money they gain from mining and poisoning than caring for the water of the reserves under its control, looks like what a bunch of psychopath would do...And you know people always think psychopaths are saints until it is too late... Look it up, the kizandiby or something experiment for an example, maybe not, disappeared from "internet" Canada, like many things on the free internet full of youtube videos about all these conspiracies theories... But don't worry, people were not thinking about pollution at the time, there are always some, but nobody gives a shit at the right moment, and successful profiteers got too much protection and invincibility, you must scare them with lots of important death near them, surely not peaceful protesters. They built their reactor, with some "graissage de pattes" on some politicians, and those started the PMBBD and hype until almost everybody believed the reactors so good and necessary they wanted to build a thousand of them all around the St-Laurence river, everybody wanted a nuclear reactor in the barn, all that while we didn't even need power, we already had too much! Then, all of a sudden, within a year everybody hated nuclear reactors and they barely built just one. What happened? Quebeckers are too emotive to make sense? A little hype and they go nuts? The reactor almost blew-up, imagine a hundred...they tried to save the face by "renovating it" but it would cost 3 times a brand new one because the thing went too near meltdown, really near, but they hid the truth well, like all governments always try to do in such a situation.

The same for Shannon, a gigantic hole in the earth full of boiling chemicals of all kind ending up in drinking water! Do you think they didn't know they were poisoning people? This could have ended not much better than Chernobyl, take a truck and go dump that somewhere where there is nobody for Christ's sake! (Where? In the oceans? There was a thousand cisterns worth of these dangerous chemicals, just for a fraction of the small Canadian army, I wonder where those of the whole planet end-up...) A lot of people died from it and nobody have ever been compensated! Psychopaths try not to compensate... Nobody took responsibility, it's the alien that did it! But it is empty now, sipped into the water so long they took, so what of it? It is in lower ground water. And don't forget scientist's instruments don't detect everything and they all have tolerance values for their detected poisons, toxins and microbes. And those values are not for people like me who drink 4L of water a day...

The same for the development of anthrax, you think those psychopath didn't notice there was a city nearby? You are English? Then do these kind of horrors near Ottawa, if you must absolutely do it near a capital city... It's like the atomic bomb; they didn't know the extent it could take, if an incubator or something busted open, creating a big cloud of anthrax, it would kill French Quebeckers, and Quebec would be historically pointed if it became an international problem. The same for the experimental nuclear reactor, if things went bad then Quebec is pointed and our cities and water reap the radioactivity, if we separate, they throw a few levers and bump a few pipes for a cataclysm that will be put on our back, and that's without mentioning we can't be independent if we're a ruin, we'd be ramping back to them with our tail between our legs for one humiliating stretch. The worse is that it went so near meltdown the whole reactor got irradiated beyond repair, so they shut it down and built another one in the same place...

Everybody in the world that got manipulated by Canada to buy their superior reactor should think about better tech too, even if they are safer than ours, even if it works well past 75% nominal without bursting the heart from air circulating in its arteries, it's just that those reactors can be used to produce military grade stuff too, very useful, so every country Canada sold "its patent" to may be experimenting to make the bomb in some well hidden laboratory, but I guess only the U.S has the right to decide who is dangerous to world stability since they're the only ones to have stabilized the world with atomic bombs...and if it makes sense that only good should have the bomb, if you understand my definition of good and evil, the only one that really make sense, then nobody is presently in a position to dictate, the hand on the bomb, who should have it or not, and the more you fight to interdict this evil or that from having it, the more they'll want to use it on your evil when they'll have it, and don't worry, they'll have it one day or the other, and the one that took all kind of unfair advantages to pile-up the bombs and dictate manners to the rest of the world should be very careful not to get itself exploded. The lesson in this is that if you want to point at others as evil, you have to be good, and no systemized unfair capitalist country is good, sorry, and since good should decide, I decide to make a law where it is illegal to have any military device production, atomic bomb, artillery, spy planes to bombers, missiles, tanks, chemical, biological, all that should never have existed. So from now on, only personal guns are permitted, no self-propelled armor, but I like grenades and bazookas, take your violence in the face if you like war, the international nationalists or something, must imperatively resize to reserve level any country breaking that law, and I'm just talking for this incredibly retarded ego reality and its "powerful" "gods" who got fear and continual tension implanted as a necessary control tool, in an appropriately evolved reality not based on ego inflation competition, there is simply no need for wars anymore. The only exception is extraterrestrials and controlling those who decide to produce better weaponry than hunting guns, that's why a global equilibrium structure with a war machine is still necessary, but such a machine must only be ready in production and very small in reality, furthermore, it must be under the control of people concerned, which is the whole planet of independent people. I'll explain how that can be achieved in the "Life Reality" chapter.

And don't tell me I didn't follow the historical path of things; you think I'll read a thousand books and watch a thousand movies until I'm brainwashed to form my opinion? I would never have enough time to write what I think of this reality if I had to become an expert of everything doubled by a an history expert. I didn't read a book on economics to form my judgment, sorry, I don't know what I'm talking about, I'm just supposing things must work like this and like that in hell... But yes, if I had studied the subject profoundly I would have found many more reasons why it is crap, but my arguments are sufficient for anybody with some will to seek a good path, to totally discard this system and start over from 0, there are twice enough to say the system is invalid as a good human base. And so I don't need to get a diploma and decorticate everything to find more arguments to strengthen my view; don't you have enough? It's enough for me, unless you want that I add another 60 pages.

I do what I do because I don't like to let others decide what I'm supposed to decide myself as an adult. I like to control my own life and this is not only a normal state of being but it is a necessary one for sane evolution too, so it has nothing to do with psychopathy; why is it good to let other control your own life and it is bad if you do it yourself? The less we have control of our deciding, the more slaves we are, and the less human value we have. What affects nobody else negatively except me is for my own deciding and I will hate anybody that steals this faculty from me, but I can deal things. The same when I'm concerned by a decision, I want my actual say in cold hard worth of judgment. Deciding is so closely associated to judgment that it works exactly under the same laws; when many people are involved, a decision is taken by the adults concerned by it (with some exceptions and limits mainly dictated by time), in the scenario where things are systemized to minimize bullshit from competition.

Those people who separated different areas of judgment between themselves are holding the main responsibility, from their incomplete judgment, for building an inadequate reality in their image, which is manipulation and profiting competition. They have slowly with time, by improving a system better satisfying their emphasis of personality, by the wheel of their incomplete judgment and forever reinforced pressure selection, condemned humanity not only to a fraction of its potential, but to failure altogether. Some human properties have become atrophied to insignificance through our history, at the hands of jealous fearful control freaks manipulators with a complex of inferiority. While I'll concede that it may have been hard to do otherwise, let's say it's a natural step of high consciousness, even a critical one you have to go through and live with to succeed, the fact remains that responsibility for failure will be inversely proportional to the pyramid of interdependent condemnation; everybody's parts to condemn humanity through history proportional to means, which can take the form of not taking your human responsibility of growing an adequate mind; as an adult you're not supposed to endorse a way of life if you don't understand it, unless you are born with a mental deficiency. And sorry if you've been had, or didn't take the small amount of time to ask yourself such basic questions, or stand to your conclusions, innocence and tools are discarded, recycled or broken, only the best survive.

We are at a point today, that only through the birthing of a new reality can we gain back the tools and strength to redirect humanity toward better priorities and noble goals. You need a way to dynamically change almost any laws to reflect the slow changes that will go through the global judgment and decisions of the people. That is why almost any affirmations made about the human in this reality are doubtful; you don't know what it is yet, so stop saying we are like this or like that. With this book I'm proving humans are very different than what you, scientists, psy, media and publicists and experts are trying so hard to make us believe we are until we are; we don't know what we are because we condemned ourselves to a selection process, and it will take thousands of years of global judgment, living without pressures, to stabilize judgment enough so that we can have the slightest of idea of what or how we somewhat are, and this will always change with discoveries and technologies; the changes going through the people of a civilization.

One limiting factor in our deciding is fear. Fears slow us down, fears modify judgment, and fears make us build defense and weapons. In some part of our very old history we had excellent reasons to survive out of fear, today, even if it is still important, it should be a very minor thing in our lives, and with consciousness, most fears should almost disappear to be replaced by more logical or up to date fears. Why are we so overwhelmed in fears that it is a cultural trait all over the world? Because the most ego people are logically the most fearful, because of them we never had a chance to control our fears; they create and encourage fear as the cement holding the pyramid together. Stop the fear and the pyramids will crumble and that's their worst fear.

We are culturally pressure selected to fear everything and anything, and powerful people in position of control transmit their beliefs and fears everywhere, humanity have always been their hostage, and they'll blow it all if you try to remove it from their vampire mouth, they need it to keep on sucking blood, the more people, the happier they are.

Woops, I mean, fear is the basic principle upon which competition hold, we even make fear bigger than reality by hyping it to the point inventing phobias of everything and anything, and spreading it thick on almost all our entertainment. We are living in an economy of competition from the beginning of time, we create competitive fears to create dependences, creating fears and exploiting these fears, an example of profiting from innocence, like every "good" sect, religions, movie, or predicator of the end do (I don't profit, I'd be happy to dump this book in your hands and run away, I'm continually trying to deduct how I can deal my life with this, so don't you ever say I do this for self-interests, I wish I could leave you these kind of self-interests...).

When you fear something that is possible, you may attract the situation to yourself, like an unconscious drive to look into it; if you fear the end is coming, or that things will lead to disaster in the future, you'll risk creating the situation for it by unconsciously taking the path to go see if it's true or what's the problem there, that's in part why I still have faith in humanity and I'm still writing, so in a sense we let hell become reality to know what attitudes to fight, but that's the way of unconscious life, it's like saying I still have faith in life, and humans are part of life. The joke is that I said "unconsciously", with consciousness, you can see in advance, understand, and skip it all.

Fear is an emotion too, so dreams contains elements of fear that your unconscious may transmit to you as a message that something will be wrong in the future, that is so because life is a momentum, your brain cumulates information, it knows the historical path you have chosen, so all it has to do is extrapolate with modifiers while you sleep, even while you're awake. Evidently, you're supposed to do that with consciousness, but you can't see very far, whatever your deductive tools and abilities, too much interrelated details and jobs interfering. I mentioned that in the "The seat of my mind" chapter, that you can't have the space or capacity to deal with everything, or all expertise, so when you sleep you shut down lots of things, like sight and consciousness, which frees other capacities, but what can you do in sleep without consciousness? Not much, but I believe dreams could do much in a good reality taking care of its language, after lots of time...So you can stuff your brain as much as you want with present and historical stuff thinking you'll have a better deduction ability of the future, and it may work to some limited extent, but you could deduct far more without any effort by shutting down most of your senses, thus waking-up to describe Nostradamus visions. I'm exaggerating, too difficult to get or attain, and that's without saying that I'm no amateur of the Nostradamus story; it's more like a big manipulation to me, even if some parts could be credible. Now, if you didn't change the path, if you didn't listen to the crazy, or if you saw it as profit or misinterpreted the stuff, then too bad for you, but I will concede that believing in dreams as visions is not much convincing. Yet, I'm absolutely sure it happened to all civilizations on earth millions of times and those that took the means to change things either profited from it or laughed about it, depending if it could glorify their vision of things.

We spend lots of money to smolder our fears, we grow fat because our unconscious is brainwashed to fear hunger, we become thin because we fear dying from a heart attack from growing fat, we buy beauty products because we fear this or that, we take steroids because we fear losing to competition, we kill or make war because we fear a competitor, and on and on and on you can go in the infinite counterproductive cost fears put on our civilization, but that's good for the "economy". Did I mention that an "economy" is not necessarily a good thing? Yes, maybe 3/10 of the current "economy" is good, the rest is a problem. Even if there are all kinds of fears, and you absolutely cannot judge them in the same manner, maybe 1/10 of our fears are justified, the rest simply disappear when we better understand.

As an added note about fat fear, I'll say that it's a relative fear since I can grow fat because I absolutely like the taste or for a comforting effect. So I may be wrong by saying we grow fat out of fear, it may be an old fear that have been exacerbated for a long time, even if that can still be true today in some situations. Anyway, I'm justifying for nothing since nobody possesses all fears. But it can be a clue as to the many years it can take to just begin "relaxing" a fear. Now, I do not believe fat was a survival tool, I believe, again, that it is an adverse effect of the "think big" or ego-gods ideology; selecting and encouraging bigger people (a synonym of opulence and richness until not so long ago, fat and tall people were the sexy ones until medicine got the less fat people to live longer, creating a new fear...for some). I believe the rich or powerful, were far better fed, more fearful of death, and had any woman they wanted. And so they were more selected and encouraged for reproduction (you won't find proof of that; "gods" are saints maker of history, and that's the image they try to leave when they're old, their ideal of youth, when they could run around, so they're all Appolon and hermaphrodites in drawings, who is that Korean supreme guy that will kill you if you draw him at his true height? And that is in the present...), and that increased their number, the pressure selection was so intense that it became a genetic mutation deformity momentum, somewhat the same we did with our mind for competition, manipulation, and profiting, even if you won't find the amalgam of genetics that gives the result, you'd need to compare a bunch of original chimp to a bunch of modern profiteer or manipulators, and it's still not a guarantee you'll deduct adequately. Now, it sure doesn't help to stuff 10 kilos of MC Donald's every day, but saying it was a survival tool is another bullshit from scientists about life; just take a random number of people (not rats!) and compare how long they survive (to actual death) without eating and you won't see much of a difference between all of them. Besides, hardworking muscles may make you survive longer, as an energy source, than fat, and with muscles you can do a lot more to find food, and die of hunger bringing it to your big god which will in turn let you die in times of famines while keeping a load of the prettiest women to minimally save that in them, and to implant their recipe of success, and then you can guess that the thin survivors started eating like pigs out of fear, creating "after effect fat". Far from evolving, the human became more limited, skills and attitudes have been atrophied. So saying we survived because of fat people is an absolute PMBBD lie, we are in truth dying from an evil selection of ego powerful beings. There are fat scientists, as there are homosexual ones, as there are bald ones and many others with difficulties they are not proud of or that affect their self-esteem, and being proud is critically important in this reality, everybody wants to be normal and proud and fit in (there are always exceptions) and it is very important to prove an anomaly is not our fault and that's what they continually try to do, just like people supposedly controlled by their hormones.

Control maniacs (profiteers) will destroy everything while saying trust us or sacrifice to the end and their selection will bow, they'll put the fault on others or individuality and run to hide in their luxury home (bunker with layers of protection; gate, alarm, cops, door, basement etc.). They'll give the image they tried to save things, so that history will remember them as good people that made mistakes, and when information begins to crack down and degrade in an overload of troubles, they'll disappear in their holes and await and exploit opportunities to get out of their hole to try raising hell all over again until some cataclysmic event happens that they can't control. And you can kill me all you want like things will be better without my opinion, nothing will change if people do nothing and just continue as usual, and don't worry, you'll have willfully forgotten about me when you'll face hopelessness (loss of potential, you'll be left waiting a trillion years for your bullshit of a god to save you...). Yes they'll be the winners, as they finally reach their end, we will have given them everything from the beginning of our existence to the end and we'll have reaped troubles and death. They can't associate as individuals and learn to be human, all they can see is manipulation, profiting and competition, getting the unfair economy as big as possible to drive their tons of means to their pyramidal vision, skewed life understanding, powerful stupidity, way of love, respect of others, way of fairness, way of life, gods, I reject all their ways, I don't want this future, I declare war to it.

In fact, the hiding of evil under that much PMBBD may be a sign that things are ready for the final battle of good vs evil, or judgment day, if we condemned ourselves that much, if the happiness is that much dependent from artifices and the projected happy façade is that much conflict with the truth, if the tools are there to defend good and sense but people prefer to cultivate selective innocence, or systemize PMBBD, then we are ready, innocence is not an argument anymore, except for kids or retards. We can do things without too much death if everybody associates, but if we wait for too late and things degenerate, for whatever reasons, and we are forced to random death, then we'll fail.

If I can I will not permit humanity to continue this vision, it will end here, and I have this right, I'm fighting fire with fire; I'm competing your vision of gods! Life systems will sweep this earth bible style, and we'll judge you worse than we're supposed to because you were ready to sacrifice the earth and life in your certitude, and if we have to we'll destroy bluntly, globally, at the city. You like weapons of mass destruction? The unconscious Mayan Nostradamus in you dream of using those? You want so much to survive your great fears that you'll cause the end in bullshit competition?

I'm out of it a little and I have a headache and I don't feel well in my stomach, sometime happens when I write in such a spirit, a good nap or a serious walk will resettle all that, bye! I'm back, I bought some competition cigarettes full of chemical for profit, that's my reward for my last effort, I prefer other things, but cigarettes are more positive than we think for people like me, got to die a bit earlier than others, and got to keep this life going on while doing so, a cigarette is better than many other negative things, and this reality understood that very well; anything evil is better than suicide... I should add that the less evil you are, the shorter the lifespan, and nobody of this reality will make me believe the contrary, whatever your lower end dreamers sometime get shot; I've got all the necessary examples, and I don't take them on TV. Anyway, you'll show me your lower end getting shot, while the worst ones die old, they "love" their reality too much, they have their paradise, and they'll almost get a national funeral at it. There are evident and known killers of the mafia that are publicized positively by communication manipulators, they get a big funeral full of criminals and it's a national thing, our culture and all, our best system. There is only one thing in the tomb of a criminal; death, price to his entourage, mind and body; you admire that? No problem, you have chosen your side, next time the like of you will discover a bomb in the tomb. If your brain is wasted in bullcrap I'll help others by erasing its programming, since such attitudes get transmitted to children and all kind of innocent people like fun, you like criminals? You accept them? Tolerate them? Then you're not worth your life, but don't worry, the pain will be minimal, you'll just shut down and my mind will immediately forget you as worse than nothing, I don't give a shit as you didn't give a shit, but yes, like you I'll be proud and make a party, for very different reasons...(I like vengeance, retribution, justice, it goes with my paranoia over fairness I guess, but I'm not strong on torture, I would have no problem judging and eliminating evil people as I take a walk in hell, even if I make a collateral mistake once in a while, but inflicting pain could give me bad dreams).

My personal fears are fears I selected out of consciousness, like fearing the end at the hands of ego people. I have fears that make sense, and logical fears that I'm not supposed to control or eliminate (those fears brain-dead people are so proud to fight). All other fears have been slowly eliminated by over time by logical argumentation from consciousness. As a young man I had lots of bad luck stupid accidents that developed in bad luck fears, (like getting struck by lightning...) I thought I attracted life threatening things and situations to me like a magnet and that contributed to make me a uncertain and antisocial person, and that is still somewhat true to this day. As I later in my life started playing with all kind of philosophical concepts, I would need to find an explanation to this luck thing. Trying to explain luck, even if it was a shaky explanation, contributed to eliminate my bad luck fear, and it permitted a harmonic implementation effect with my global philosophy. The other factor was my continual confrontation with it. My "bad luck" and ability to do exactly what people don't like, or my candor, or my ability to attract problems, brought me so often in trouble, sometime even near death, that it has become a "natural" state for me, something that is part of my life. Fighting it, even provoking it, along with giving myself a definition of it, gave surprising results...

FIRE UNICORN

There is not much to say about this dream but I have to write about it since it contains an element some will discard as impossible and you know by now how I like to kick science a little.

As a young man I sometimes caught a terrible cold that almost killed me. The first time, I was in the army and I truly almost died out of it. The last time, it didn't last as long, but still a good week of very difficult times. I finished that cold by dreaming almost all day long for two days in a row, only waking up to eat or lower my temperature (cold baths). All along I dreamt of only one thing; I was galloping in blood on a unicorn with swords and fighting. It would take me some time falling asleep only to half wake up some time later galloping. I still can feel the feeling but it is very hard to explain, I knew I could wake up anytime but I kept on fighting no end because, even if I didn't feel good, I knew it was better fighting than waking up. And I fought, it was an invasion of round monsters with black spots and tentacles, I was passing by vast convoys of red cells, always counter current, in my orange half vision and half feeling quest to destroy the enemy on my unicorn friend, ramming, slashing, bursting, exploding, swinging, throwing around enemies with its head, jumping, kicking and stomping in a frenzy of red-orange flaming hairs, and me slashing both sides under a never ending rain of green, black and red gore and tentacles.

I don't know how this can be explained, I know I'm totally out of dreaming standards, but this beats it all. Two days galloping and my cold was out, never had a cold again after that and it's been more than 15 years. How could I get on the unicorn every time I fell asleep? You can say what you want, I know this won't fit in your vision of what life can do, but I'm sure it actually had a decisive effect on stopping this cold, so if that is some kind of extrapolation of a placebo-visualization-dream effect, maybe they are more powerful than we think.

You have a good idea of how I see dreams if you read previous chapters, I believe they are an incomplete developing modifier in humans, they probably started as a sickness with a positive facet in some lifeform, mutated to keep the positive (wanted) facet through natural selection, was developed further in animals, something like that. But its ultimate benefits would be related to mind capacities, I don't think insects make very hot dreams, so we are the ones that will develop dreams to their ultimate form because our consciousness goes beyond anything animal. And it's form is far from done is my belief, like all the truth we are developing as humans, there is great potential there, in fact, it may be very possible that the next big human "mutation" or evolution be related to dreams. I won't repeat all the possibilities of dreams for the future human, I'll just add that they could be the key to increase the power of some modifiers that are subjugated from senses input when we are awake, in fact, the evolution of humans dreams, like in 10 000 years, could multiply some of our mind capacities under another form of communication more directly connected to life; words association to emotions, but for that we'll have to think differently of languages and somewhat follow my view of the mind I wrote about in the "The Seat Of My Mind"; we'll have to develop the truth of languages far better than we currently do, in fact, it may be highly possible that many graphical representations we have in dreams are bizarre or wrong or scary simply because our words in reality are twisted in meanings or they have multi or conflicting meaning, thus messing the emotive message in our dreams.

The giant

I met this giant recently, 2 heads taller than me, walking alone in a grey-brown wasteland, I was hidden behind a big grey rock that didn't fit the décor and upon seeing him from far away, I said to myself "who else than a lone giant; those always end-up alone because nobody can follow them" and I joined his walk in silence. His foot were big bags of cloth tied at the ankle, I could guess they were hurting but he was in good shape, then I made a kind of curve away to decide something, almost deciding to go back behind the same rock that seemingly followed me, but I end-up in front of him instead, and I walked in front of him some time before reaching a ruin. The place felt dangerous, he was going to continue but I told him we'd have to take a break and clean ourselves before going any further, he smiled his first expression and went looking to the right but I spotted a hole in a side wall I didn't trust, I thought I saw a gun sticking out, but not clearly, so I grabbed him and pointed to a source of water I heard to the left, we stopped there and I woke up.

THE SHELLING PART 9

************

MUD STREET

So, what do you think of me? Am I hot? Questions, questions, but yes, seriously, it's hard to know how people generally see me without making an emphasis, and it is often based on feelings, which can be highly debatable. But I'm still entitled to an opinion on the matter, as I often repeat myself that I must minimize bias, to be not only truthful, but frank, while knowing that my job is not to describe pretty girls, or glorify those people who saved someone... Good judgment is made of many principles, in fact, good general judgment is the most complex quality one can develop.

My opinion (judgment) of the opinion (judgment) of people about me isn't super positive because I got this propension to naturally take an attitude to test people versus an attitude I naturally judge as gentle. Or if you prefer, I have one innocence aspect or the other, depending on the people around me, and the way people interact with me will reveal their bad aspects as a verification of a candid opinion I'm developing. I don't explain well, and it's quite weird as it's really out of my control, but I'm really made to reveal evil, that's my freaking skill, I just attract the stuff like bad luck (strange that seems to make sense with my vision of luck) and it's an unbelievable load of troubles and it is me that pays the price in my extreme sensitivity to others. Sometimes I wonder if it's not some kind of super psychological overreaction to knowing I'm no better than most people, that I'm a frustrated leadership aspect, that most people should be my friends, and my heart is broken knowing it will never be the case because of the reality those who cheated me my destiny made wrongfully, not understanding for what people like me stand for and only seeking the glory. Yep, I'm a vessel of life, transcended, I'm just a tool, meant to lead life to glory, I'm the natural aspect of selection for humans, and it means you're not done with me, I'll be the surviving one for I am possibility, when there will be nothing there will still be me, the unknown, in a place beyond your manipulations, looking at you as you die...So yes I'm hot!

Understanding that, while completely not being in a reality adequate for me, because the usurpers of my throne, profiteers and manipulators, destroyed the human spirit and made a mess of life and reality while making me an enemy, then my potential at making things right has become almost nil, in fact, I'm in a situation where I doubt the earth is still sufficiently healthy and resourceful to permit the success of solar life. But I'm still there, standing, and I'll fight, and I won't let anybody get away with it, even if all solar life fails at the hand of evil, I'll still distribute pain beyond death, not because I like it, but in the name of life and the UI, and if my feeling of frustration as I watched life and the earth degenerate took the form of a psychotic violence I have hidden all my life, wait until I unleash it all in psychotic rage after I die!

I'm not the kind of guy to leave people indifferent, so you can bet things go sideways quick enough with those who make a fixation on me like they should control me, or those who made this hell and think it is those with a different attitude, like me, who must change things the way they want, surely not the way I want, and their part is to do as usual; It's like unconscious evil pushing me to change thing for its comfort while laughing. People want me to do something, anything but what I want to do, they embark in my skin to imagine my great future in their big monetary and glory empathy, completely oblivious of what's involved in making me, while moralizing me for not taking the same attitude as them. So I'm a never ending deception, a failure in what people want of me, I'm not what they thought I could be, or I don't fit their vision, or I don't do what they'd do if they were me, so I reap all kind of challenging or degrading attitudes; that's what I often feel and that's in part what I'm doing; answering those conflicts as myself, why everybody is wrong about me in their great wisdom of what I should be with my potential. And no I don't feel prosecuted, it's just the how things work in hell, I feel totally powerful in fact, but totally powerless at the same time because my powers must be a tool to serve this reality which is against all what I stand for, I feel I have great leadership qualities, but it is wasted in frustration since I refuse to lead people to illusions.

It's not hateful, I never actually felt I was really hated bad, it's more like a coincidence of factors, including my part, that instilled revolt in me, and it worked, I cumulated a whole backpack of hate to the point that innocence is so far away it is unacceptable, and what am I supposed to do now with that? My best? Yes, you hit me, I hit you back; first logic of existence, for every action a reaction, and it is unconscious even if you exhaust it through 100 different displaced areas; even if you keep it to yourself, you'll transmit it to others through reproduction and through feelings. Consciousness reaches self-ability around adulthood, good for regrets, so yes you are condemned to distribute back, and those who don't will give more difficulties to those who do; until someone ends-up with the ability to write a never ending parody of the kit, which means that the reality has become a parody. And the one writing the parody is probably the person that likes the less to make a parody of life, love, people, but too bad.

And don't cry because I do magic kick-back with what you threw to me all my life, I passed my time catching PMBBD, cumulating it for identification of incoming and eventual redistribution to source when gaining sufficient intelligence, with an emphasis on those distributing it massively, my pack is compressed full to explode, sorry for you if I can't take anymore.

I say that because I don't want people to read me too quickly without involving much feelings, so I'm virulent and it's not my ideal attitude, but I know that the ones who continue reading are thinking and judging, and that's valuable to me, so carry on, I'm not finished, this is supposed to be my all out chapter. Just don't forget that I'm not depressed so you shouldn't accuse me of giving you depression, look somewhere else. Still, while I see things a little gloomy, I manage to go to sleep with a smile, I laugh some too, healthy laughing at it, don't think I don't see myself sounding crazy, but be careful said theory that I'm crazy is not a proof of the contrary, and I ended-up doing the same with all my mental maladies, just so I could fool myself that I'm healthy. So I try to appreciate humoristically, as I participate in my extreme exercise in humility. It's very hard, really, and I started from very low for an added difficulty, I was gifted with some challenging particularities, as for who gave the gifts, well, let's say they measured things close enough for me, it's just that the megalomaniacal psychosis aspect of things makes me a bit euphoric these days, and I really shouldn't, ever...

There is another facet to that which amplifies everything; a good and strong developing mind and body going through too much misunderstanding in youth will expand logic paths of understanding (good and strong mind and body); what psy call a mental retard or sickness because it is beyond all their pile of mental prejudicial understanding they get from witnessing those who quickly understood such a quest was not for them, ending-up with real mental problems.

But in the end, do you think my dream life was to reap troubles and sacrifice everything? No, I was "forced" in big part, and I'll be tired of dwelling in this once I'll be done. You think it is fun? You think it is logical that someone is capable of spending his life in its corner writing its revolt? How is this possible? What do you want more? A scientific study to prove it all? Respectful people that will tell you what you like to hear?

I'd like to say my things simply, respectfully, peacefully, with compassion, tolerance, but this reality have proven over and out that this doesn't work and I don't feel like there is more time for that, I even believe that continuing in this reality that uses and twist the meaning of all principles for profiting will lead to the end soon. We continue that path and masses will die like never before, if everything goes well, and it won't be for something better even if people believe so, for that you'd need a truly different fundamental philosophy in everything and a planet and humanity with still enough potential to escape dust to dust.

The more time advances, the more people have a closed mind to any different attitude than what is marketed by this reality, and all things that fit the reality can be considered change or evolution. People look on publicized television for the next trend, or publicized internet for the next trend or publicized popular books for the next trend, better when is justified by a scientific study, whatever the doubtful methodology, further twisted by manipulators on TV. Any cosmetic that doesn't affect too much their way of life or that can provide a difference is enough for many, the most profound seek themselves some standard school spirituality or philosophy or mentality, if not then you goy you tube to provide conspiracy theories, or facebook bullshit citations from popular people that sound pretty for a philosophy. Well, maybe it's not totally like that, what I mean is that people hardly question things by themselves anymore, too long, not their expertise or responsibility, they prefer choices of opinions given by newsmen or publicized experts or they follow the path of thinking of some internet guru; they are overwhelmed by the reality too quickly and intensively, their happiness is dependent from visuals. Not much better, what I mean is that most people feel so powerless that they totally dump their human value before reaching adulthood; It is my opinion that people begin to be adults at 30 in this reality, so I wouldn't accuse the youth for taking it easy, or not taking things too seriously, I'd even encourage them to not embark too quickly, the problem is that this reality want brain programmed slaves at 16 years old, and once you reach 30 years old, then you already have a mentality or a lifestyle to defend and dependences, to PMBBD in a lot of instances. People are cared to look at their own wrongs adequately, scared to look at the truth of the reality they encourage, scared to have been wrong, scared to have made wrong investments, scared to lose self-esteem, so stubbornness or denial is the best option, increasing potential for conflict situations, it's even better to invest one's remains of independent intelligence in murder to be the winner...All is left is criticizing to make the system more invincible, even the strongest protesters are microbes strengthening the immunology system of the reality. There is always a batch that got things to prove evidently, even the handicapped get a slap in the back, a hole in the brain is an opportunity to smile on TV positively. Most become defenders one way or the other of the only order, the rest become neutralities, self-accepted as such slaves, ego dreamers waiting for an opportunity, or limiting their humanity for family, working for the sake of a success story, sensitivities encased in nationalism or publicity. They sure think they're making things better while they don't stop worsening whatever their faith in their reality, whatever their efforts to make it better or more tolerable. Humanity is thus decided as like this and like that by people calling themselves scientists, gods of human parameters acquiescing the human is finished, we know everything about life, with a scientific study to prove it, no use for existence anymore.

I have come to believe a lot of people could better develop in a better way without having a more difficult life for it, an easier one is more like it, particularly for those who like more humane and life caring ways, who are forever more reduced as the pressure selection continues; you'll be lucky if they don't end up in drugs or alcohol or prostitution since they have the same needs as everybody else, if not more. A lot will do all kind of stupid things, and, as the reality slowly sets in their mind, they will come to one day feel bad about their past or the path they have chosen, wreck they made of their lives or the lives of others. When they have failed to develop the capacities to permit them to know the true reasons why things went sideways like that, they will start listening to the priests (psy) of this reality and they will start bowing to it while they were better made to fight against it. This reality likes to make monsters out of the people, even those with the best potential, until they can't protest anymore because they acted to put themselves on par with the reality they have to live in. They knew drugs are bad from the beginning (or killing or whatever), and they made themselves responsible for the price they paid for not letting the reality control and decide for them, in the name of liberty I should add. In the end, people are supposed to act in the way the reality asks of them as a proof that it is the best, the reality or system is just not perfect, but people are supposed to be, reacting ideally whatever the state of reality, as long as it's justified psychologically. But all that is a fallacy, life is not yours to control robotically, it will die in your hands unconsciously.

As I have been I stand for the young innocent revolted that don't know how to protest or what to do with his strength of will, sometimes added to his capacity to be more sensible to things; those young people are the ones I have the most faith in to really change the fundamentals, they are the closest to me, even if they can derap easily. If they stand with candor they'll become magnets for profiteers and manipulators, as an evil challenge to prove everybody can be corrupted or bullshitted. You can't even pick yourself a nice principle, you have to do everything yourself, nobody and nothing can be trusted in hell, the best at heart have all the means against them, vampires flying around singing peace and love or democracy, or sexual idiocy. Those who took means will try to make you a part of their reality one way or the other, the faster the better, they're out to get you and they will succeed. Governments, sects, religions, cultural groupings, publicists, industrialists, pharmacologists etc; they're all competing to control every parts of you, and they all have a hundred manipulation tools to do it. You'll all end up encouraging this reality one way or the other and that will leave nobody but the rare exceptional accident to fight for such a thing that everybody will end up qualifying as a lost cause.

Yes you can all mind yourselves to be pseudo-happy in hell, find yourself a place, even a "niche", but the more people are embarked the more those who stand for good with integrity gain value in the face of life and gods, and this point will always remain, whatever the amount of pressure selection being made, whatever the imprisonment, censorship, assassination, manipulation being used. There will always be someone that will battle cheaters, until life becomes so revolted that terror and destruction is rewarded as an adequate expression, an evil you'll fight to worsen your situation.

We unconsciously (life) know we have the power to change anything we manipulate, and I wouldn't underestimate the possibility that life systems could eventually birth people as inadaptable right from the start. So we want to eliminate poverty? We know we can, but we don't do it. From that we grow conflicts in our minds, between our actions and ideologies, whole logic slabs and mind developments can be ignored, retarded, atrophied because of this. Knowing the difficulty of the task and all its repercussions is, in itself, a long and frustrating quest, so most end up saying "to hell with it" and they'll displace their frustration elsewhere while taking a drink...

Hell has been perfectly made over thousands of years to get everybody working for it with most of their intellect and physical energy spent to the task of making it invincible, the defacto life on earth, a guaranteed failure for solar life, innocence raised to god status by self-inflated certitudes. Hell's angels even believe hell is paved with good intent, methodologically ignoring that evil is continually at work twisting good intent to make hell. I can invent the best way for good, but if I'm forced to let it be modified by people seeking profits, worse if they're ego people already having the means, it won't stay the best way long for sure (means mean anything, don't forget that, liberties, PMBBD, money, status, control etc). Even if the best way is made, what's stopping a drunk driver without consciousness killing people? And what will happens in hell? The hydra with 10 heads will create costly and expensive structure that some gang can profit from and the problem (drunk driver) will stay eternal, lawyers, judges, psy, incarceration workers, all those will make money, thanks to the drunk driver. And that's without mentioning the cost of all the structures and the counter productivity (toward good goals) of the whole kit, even if it is good for the "economy"; instead of interdicting the way, it will create recidivists of the kind of people that make hell with it, it will worsen everything by making everything more costly or inefficient and the best way will become hell's way.

I'm pushing a little, but you understand that people with truly good intents, whatever happens to those good intents in hell, are still the best exemplary people, and it's the worst of a twisted crime to dump the responsibility for making hell on their shoulders with such shut-up argumentation as "hell is paved with good intents". You're creating a pressure to select out good people from a possible better ideal, and to add insult to injury, you'll say that if this reality is like that, it's because good people don't work hard enough, or do nothing to change things, the truth is more like "Hell is built by evil people and their competitive ego innocents".

And what do those "good" people, who are supposed to be responsible for this hell because they don't do enough, can do anyway? Can they do something else than patching pyramids? Can they argument when principles can be twisted to serve conflicting views? Can they revolt? They can't even protest peacefully! Where is the manipulator that said that anyway? And those who spread such "wisdom" are where? Who are these "good" people?

This world is not like that because the "good" people let it degenerate, the independence of the "good" people have been controlled and stolen by the manipulators and profiteers of this world, in youth, by using PMBBD. Judgment is missing, and the capacity to express it with some effect too, which is not surprising since judgment is missing, see? Do your "good" people have the money (reality morphing action power) to change the reality? No, because they'd get corrupt you know, so they better steer away from the means, particularly since they're fond on getting had by taking their spirituality from provided religions. I won't say they don't have their responsibility in this mess, but they are far from being the ones on whom I would dump most of it. What if your "do gooders" need to stop patching the pyramids to do some "good", stop adding to your stash, will you let them? No eh! You need everybody...Besides; your "do gooders" would spend it for what, except growing some other ego besides theirs? Doing good means working hard and making babies? Available across the spectrum, helping the exhausted, mentally sick, exploited, famished or broken workers, or the biafras in Africa maybe? Or cataclysm victims? Become reporters? Ah, they got to think and judge reality more than superficially, and that's is real scary and not the kind of stuff young people want to do, they got to have more and straighter principles too, all making one's life more difficult in hell.

Good people is good brains too, in fact, the best people in the grand scheme of things are supposed to all be good people generally, and this should be reflected somewhere in reality, if our way of developing people is 60% right, unless standing for the best way of things is the last of their priorities...They are supposed to act exemplary toward valid ideals, stand for and build an adequate ideal of reality for their progeniture (future), as far as their consciousness permits them to see and understand, help people an life if they can too evidently, after taking care of themselves as a priority. And while they're not supposed to work like crazy for that, nobody is supposed to have it harder than others in the ideal of fairness, they still have to defend what makes sense, not embark in anything. The best I can do, for now, is to give good people the credit for their illusion of trying to make the world better, so sorry if I seems to lack these "qualities" that make them such a necessity in this reality.

Still, I judge people who are really trying to be and do good, not just sometimes but always, as hugely better than people who just "follow the wave", yet, they are still encouraging this reality unconsciously. So you may work as much as you can, help as much people in misery as you can, suffer as much as you can endure; you are still a subsystem helping one inefficiency in the fantastic amount there is in this reality (in the sense that there should not be that much misery and you should, and you're supposed to, be doing something else with your life, no?).

In the end, I'll say, and this is quite a compliment, that things are somewhat 50-50; for one person that may be more good there is one that is more evil, a situation where evil is sure to always profit from good people, no way to stop them since evil is less shy doing any manipulation to reach their goal. And the first one to systemize things is the is not necessarily the one with the most patience, after that, the question of good is making something good out of it when they can, patching and healing.

We have been doing with humanity the same thing we are doing with fruits and vegetables; selection with the goal of making a mentally homogenous population filling the criteria needed by the reality for an ant civilization of social animals, with manipulation, profitability, and competition as our "big" properties. More and more people are big vegetables with a brain full of water from school and socialization but they do the job like any vegetables do the job of feeding with every kind of flavor. We have been making this pressure selection to mainly encourage ego attitudes, appearance and sexual traits, (nothing against that to some extent). Then there is manipulability, few skills exacerbation, dependency, adaptation, tolerance, acceptance, selectiveness of brain skills (the Q thing), selectiveness of memory, of pains, of emotions, of attitude, sensibility to PMBBD and hype, etc.

Most of it has been done through pressure of PMBBD on masses through our whole history. Humanity morphed through time, people who better adapted or accepted or tolerated thrived and the ones that fought or didn't adapt died, and that can be from anything, suicide, enslavement, genetic reinforcement of attitudes, even developing cancer from negatively seeing the world; an evil person will find arguments to defend and see hell positively, particularly if he gears his intelligence more toward profiting, or enters a comparative scenario and finds himself lucky besides others, but a good person will tend to do the contrary, and not superficially, to manipulate socially.

Selectivity is not a bad thing in itself, but it must be made under maximal consciousness, while following good ideals and straight principles, while following the judgment of those concerned, not some gang. At a personal level, the extrapolation of true love can do this job naturally, and it exists, among other things, to select, and to select you need consciousness, so alcohol is not the best at finding love ("selecting" a person).

In fact, love is the most powerful selection tool given to us by life systems, and everybody can have it and will always have it whatever the frustration of ego gods at taking it away from them for stashing or marketing. But what they can't take, they control or destroy; love is in the perfect situation, the perfect ground for an impossible vastness of pressures and PMBBD. Next, the fight of love is always closely related to time, everything is to some extent, but it's more of a basis here; true love takes time and in a reality without enough time, or PMBBD to that effect, or illusion of not having enough, people are pushed to seek extremes as much as possible, where there is potential for ego growth or show-off, breaking needed love constants. That's why we must see sex as one of many parts of love, I want to say "I love" even if I'm not having an orgasm.

As I explained in the "Love Entanglement" chapter, love is a developing truth, like joy or pain, and we must take care of it, not use it in conflicting definitions or to manipulate. Pain, be it physical or mental, for scientists is chemicals, something they can produce and use to manipulate people, and love too, but they are wrong, chemicals are only triggers, communication. But yes you can turn pain upside down to try to prove it doesn't exist otherwise than as some funky fake interrelations of false effect from the death of cells or whatever, but the truth of pain is that it was made true (existent) through life systems and that's it for me. When I stuck my finger in a door crack, it is just a fact to me that it is painful, so you can boast you're a big hypnotist that makes pain inexistent all you want, let's see how that works when I'll close the door a few times; I bet you'll cry like a baby how much you are sorry. You can make extreme effort all you want for thousands of years to compete life will, but you'll never eliminate the truth of pain without destroying life. That applies to developing a love vision too, except it is a human specificity at the "start" of its truth, you need to act civilized for it to develop adequately, it's our reproduction ideal, at the level of complexity of the species, so life is far from done making it a truth for us, it is more advanced developing a yawning waiting after us while we contort it senseless... We may never know the extent of it, the true power of love, because we'll compete it, and instead of making a beautiful heart, we'll make a piece of contorted stuff without much of a form, a random libertine thing life can do in a second, no, an ego thing, a deal, a contract, just to be exactly at the opposite of a good view of it.

Not being revolted so much I could dream of taking some time to live a good love story, enjoy the planet and life more, people too, and I could make that time better than all those years of experiencing this reality, I could call it happiness, "wisdom", my work would be done, I'd know my ways, my limits, who I can love, I'd know my ego and how to feed it fairly, my spirit would be full; this new birth of mine could be slow, tasty, and very interesting; but it seems I find it normal these days that I'm losing hope about one of the most valuable aspect of living for me, love, the only human contact that could increase my desire to stay connected, this reality succeeded at making it a deception, no friends, no family, no love, all what I stand for desecrated. I'm left with a stash of rage, revolt and hate, as I fly completely disconnected, ripped apart, doing my shift at diplomacy and wisdom, as I feel the power readying itself for wrathful destruction!

I shouldn't be writing this, that's really super bad. I fight to see the potential, then I think I'm better lowering my arms, to forget about all that, hopeless. But I have chosen my path and I'm succeeding better than I thought whatever my opinion worsen the harder I try, so I can only go to the end of it. For now I'm more revolted than anything else, generally I should say, since you can be revolted for any kind of reasons; you can be revolted because you like life and people more than most you know.... Finally, revolt is one thing, it is better when it becomes a revolution, but a revolution must always carry a new wanted ideal that is seen as a better thing to humanity, can I provide that?

As for those who still want to grab at me and bring me back down, they will soon find I'm forever more intangible as I fly higher, inaccessible, they'll get out of breath, frustrated, and quite dirty looking up like that trying to understand, but their limited vision didn't make the connection that the root they crashed on is where I'm still connected, that in fact, I'm rooted to this earth as solidly, the leaves and the roots are part of the same tree.

But in your reality yes, I know that the biggest loser is me, and it's easy to make loads of humor with such writings, for a start, but that's still a life that dies whatever I do; I can die tomorrow for any stupid reason so better die interestingly, and after a long time...I believe I do what I should do, I justify my revolt, I explain the path I see, I'm trying to be fair, it's a shame I often feel such an enemy. But if that's the way I have to go through then you're not finished seeing heads thumbing down pyramids, maybe we will have to spray these with some true evil blood someday... Wait a minute, the Egyptians didn't kill people, they were good! Look! Beautiful pharaoh! But how do you know they died of old age, I mean the people? You think the top had class with their workers? Working hard to do what? A pyramid? And it still meant death by the way, the boss that ran the world from the "top" (psychologically) still killed tons of people by giving orders, and he eventually died with the servants he was dependent from, they entombed them alive under their pyramid, and it was an honor, like it was for the Mayan too, who is the worst? Mmm. The Egyptians since they wanted the death of all life in their religion for their gods to reign eternally. I just hope people will never tell me indoctrination with PMBBD doesn't work.

Every pyramidal civilization ended in the same manner; massive death from cataclysms, breaking the interdependent order of things they condemned themselves to in their competition of who's "god". The top (pyramid competition, country competition) ends-up seen as an eternal competition that will forever grow in size with the means at the disposition of the top, more armies, more police, more protection, until ruining cost, while revolt potential grows adequate to overwhelm, but good blood fighters got a tendency to wait for too late, when troubles are too evident, then a little famine opens their eyes to the fact they never grew human, only as social animals ready to battle over the pile of food when they're starving...That's what happens when you use PMBBD on masses until your main civilization trait is systemized unfairness, people with superficial brains that can't stand for good principles when times are critical, their divisive attitudes for competition scrap everything...Let's see what happens in these critical times now. We should be careful of sparks in such a situation, an eternally frustrated gang could suddenly become a gigantic force of destruction, carrying an ideal of bullshit that would worsen the situation...

That's how I see things; pyramidal civilizations always end-up in a mass death one way or the other, and the main culprits are those who systemize unfairness to condemnation, and boast it as the only possible system, the best, because they successfully indoctrinated people to it or successfully made a selection fitting it. Condemned by the most successful, those that fitted the best or profited the most, often the best verbal manipulators, the ones that believed the hardest in the glory too, all those survived a long time, becoming the oldest living people. That's where the division and selection took place, a category of people better survived, while the youth one day woke up in the face of still more work to keep those people in their luxury, some catalyst caused them to revolt, inadequately probably, but the well adapted older people encouraged the powers in place to give them a beating. You can make a few variants, but and that is still entirely true to this day, and that's how this pyramidal civilization will end humanity, because it took the whole earth; it is not a "civilization" in the woods named the Egyptians or Mayans or Indians that will crumble, it an economically interdependent and interconnected system of human resources management that will.

The situation would be based on more evolved arguments and cataclysms for sure though, we're not in old times where you only needed a drought to develop a problem like a famine, having food for the top and their armies and police, and leftovers for young workers who actually produced the food, and those that legally stole the food with their unfair means would sing that stealing or fighting is evil and will get you killed, something like that, anyway, unfairness will always lead to war and death, and unfairness on masses is the greatest evil, and that applies to country competition and racism, did the Egyptian see others as inferior? Probably, and we're lucky they did not make a G5 for a gang...

So I don't care your arguments that they were good people, I don't believe it, they were evil and they reaped what they sowed; invincible injustice reaps mass death. And those pyramid are too stupidly big, even for a civilization mega bad trip about death, nobody with a sane philosophy can come to the conclusion that such things are needed as an absolute, to the whip, priority; were they really that intelligent? Great visionaries seeing in the future we should admire? Hey! My civilization made pyramid tombs! Mine made cubes! Why didn't a civilization kill itself making big cubes to impress the future? It doesn't represent shit as well? Did they have that much of a pyramidal hierarchy? Not any more than any other ego civilizations, they worked in the same way, no big pyramidal system drawings nowhere, only bosses, under bosses, and slaves, like we are making a gigantic emphasis on that while it was in fact a mound with a room under it to hide the boss in case of invasion and a tomb to bury him once dead, with ant tunnels evidently, and writings that make it a very important, even sacred, ceremonial place, condemning people to stay there and protect it.

What else? They it's aligned to the speed of light or something, and there's an elevator down there that they can't use, probably hiding an interstellar vessel! And the tip is made of solar stuff that recharge the vessel! Wow, advanced! But you wouldn't desecrate a tomb by tipping it aside, particularly such important ones, you can blast a mountain mining, but you wouldn't blast such a pyramid, a tomb, wow! So yeah, some big secret could still be there somewhere, or a very big or important treasure, but they may truly have been that much of a stupid bunch, stupid people can read and write too, and there are very intelligent people that don't know how to read.

I know I don't know what I'm talking about, I'd probably need to read some scriptures to gain credibility...I know that there is a place in one that got the same number as the speed of light, they say, wow, but I say never underestimate manipulators, they'll scratch scientific hieroglyphs on some brick, but yes, the pyramids may even have been built by aliens since I can't trust someone to tell the truth, and most scientific affirmations are transformed by media people and experts, about discoveries made by one or a few scientists, which may as well bias the truth for grants or just to be right. Scientists lost loads of credibility by not taking care of their methodology while growing an inaccessible vocabulary, they are in big part responsible for the mess of PMBBD we live in today, to the point that I got to base my judgment from very basic facts, like I did all through this book; you think I'll trust experts, scientists and politicians to form myself an adequate judgment? Not at all, it is such a failure that I can form better judgment by considering everything they say as a probable manipulation.

You can pay a few charlatan to make a "serious" study that will prove anything funky like the pyramids are batteries with floating wisps everywhere, but where are the proofs? A video of drawings? I don't know, I haven't seen anything credible until now that proved something, so I do with what is evident to me; they are boring piles of rocks with some tunnels in them and a luxury tomb for a "god" and his servants, nothing is aligned, nothing is electric, no magic, all lies, the truth is sweating, pain, godly insanity. I'll have a better opinion when I'll live in a reality that don't do everything hidden behind fences and closed doors, with institution to filter dangerous information away from my fragile mind construction, that way my judgment will be more adequate...and by the way, I can't be more revolted than I'm already are so shut-up saying people will react badly to truth, the truth is that they'll react badly to evil, or to the fact they've been manipulated, cheated, completely messing-up their judgment, and that is even a fundamental aspect of my vision of life where as soon as people feel cheated they grow problematic attitudes, which can be displaced and transformed.

As for scientists, yes I may be too hard with them, but there are a lot of bullshit affirmations being made from scientific studies, which in turn are made from doubtful methodology. Presently, the way they're talking they have the philosophical stone; resources are infinite, perfectly in line with the "very" retarded mentality most profiteers have. In a few years, around 2035 they say, from their studies of how tech advances, which are always very wrong, nano robots will transform dirt to mountains of gold, cars, buildings, even humans! I say that is all bullshit for the hype dependent selection, they will succeed at doing many incredible things at a very small scale, but the big scale will require more planets, and it will always be best to exploit what a planet produces than using extraordinary means to do gold from nanobots playing with atoms...That pisses me off because I see the end of humanity as loss of potential, or hope, and the end of availability of some resources can easily lead to this, and we act like resources are infinite, all is missing is the philosopher stone to make any resource from dirt, and here we go nanobott, we'll live in a wonderful utopia in 20 years so let's produce make war and reproduce! Give those scientists a grants and an oscar now...and worry later.

So for me food is not the main problem, I doubt there will be a famine to get people to revolt, but I'm sure that at the rate we use and often waste many resources we will lose the capacity to develop in space within the next 100 years, and that will be the end of the human adventure. And the rate of resources consumption is increasing, so you sure wouldn't dare eliminate poverty...You can add the pollution, like that plastic mass in the ocean, you think it will get smaller? No, it will grow faster, or the pollution of underground waters? It takes 50 years in a lot of instances for surface pollution to reach underground waters, this problem will soon become far more evident and it will be as big as climate change, India is already struggling to find decent underground water.

Resources are the secret of everything, "powerful" people know it and that's in part why they won't eliminate poverty. What they are doing, while we're divided over all kind of issues in our personal life and views, is stashing everything for themselves, their luxury life is just one aspect, they're all digging luxury bunkers in secret all over Africa, where it looks good to spend money, and where there are huge underground lake of almost pure water. When the world will go nuts they'll survive with their family while millions, billions of people die, probably in big part battling among themselves trying to find why things went to hell; we may even already be under a developing hypocrite manipulative plan where people will die en masse due to revolt from this or that. If we're lucky around 2050 will mark our tipping point, the longest we could last in this system without grave troubles, or the height of this reality, the ego gods ideology at its best, maximal bullshit, after that things will degenerate. That's more likely what will happen, not what we're generally led to believe the future will be by TV, experts, scientists and think positive people; it's better when we're surprised by the end, generally, there are some documentaries, infantilizing mostly, nothing taken too seriously, technology is taking care of things evidently ... And when people will get tired of the blood, the vampires will get out of their hole with the gold and start the same business all over again until the earth is a dead rock, with the human as unable to leave it, all we'll have left will be to hope "god" pass by, and don't worry, the selection that will better survive will be made out of people believing in god and listening to superior manipulators, on their knees licking them asses like a drug, for a million years of misery...

Don't forget that much science is under the control of governments, they got to sing well to get grants, then media people and experts add a few notes. It's like the Japan earthquake, after a week or so collecting data, they discovered the magnetic north moved, then newsmen all over the world pushed their sensationalism to overdrive, THE NORTH POLE MOVED!! Scientists and experts were called in reinforcement to calm those hysteric journalists, and the calming argument was that earthquakes almost always caused the magnetic north to move, so stupid... Then it was normal, tv people acted like they always knew, it looked like they were trying to calm the overreacting population. Then it was forgotten. But not to me, I never understood that thing about earthquakes moving the magnetic pole, isn't the magnetic pole the result of a phenomenon going on in the center of the earth? Then how is it possible that an earthquake moved something in center earth? Aren't we living on a crust over liquid magma? I say they got it all wrong, upside down kind of wrong scientific crap, I say the magnetic pole moved and it caused the earthquake, but that would imply more than a simple logical phenomenon, since you'd have to explain why center earth is playing with its magnetic field like that, and not from inventing a small scale fitting analogy then extrapolating it to the whole universe like a scientific proof.

Hearing some of them, we'll live in a science fiction utopia in 20 years, extrapolating their stuff like kids on Walt-Disney, then they talk like we should be hostages to their discoveries because they have a methodology, while I can invalidate it half the time! I like science, but I guess that as I grow old I become more critical, and their magazines and TV documentaries and internet stories don't cut it anymore, too much bullshit, sensationalism, hype, ridiculous extrapolations, all the kind of stuff that doesn't bode well for one's credibility, whatever the methodology. Finally, the more serious articles are written in a scientific jargon that is half worthless, like they don't want normal people to understand on purpose, perfect for misinterpretation from media experts who will be more than happy to provide whatever form of hope, it goes with the job... So they'll extrapolate everything, suggesting the future will look like this or like that. It is not because a discovery is made that any imagination excesses about it will happen, stay realist is what I say, growing anything from scratch within the next 20 years, even humans, that's fairy tales to me, not realist. The same for intelligent robots everywhere, and all kind of such things. In the 70's there was an explosion of tech too, people envisioned the year 2000 as a kind of utopia where all the problems of humanity would become nonexistent. The world did change, but the utopia they predicted from science and tech advancement didn't happen, we're in a mess like never before. So I say putting humanity's fate in the hands of people who are again repeating the same pattern will be our last mistake.

To go back to leadership a little, there is all kind of bullshit about what it is, keep it simple is what I say, stop the super hero bullshit, leadership is leading people in something. Anybody can take the spot if competent, and there's no eating last and humility bullcrap like it's Jesus supper, for good people who think they must be saints, which doesn't applies to bad leadership evidently, which have the tendency to end-up in luxury...Leadership is a dangerous game without sustained introspection with a vision of yourself as one of many, and this kind of search has very good reasons to scare the people trying it, particularly older people, because one way or the other, it will bring you face to face with the 3 letters word "ego". How you decide to deal with it will tell a lot about your person. Personally, I willingly pushed it to the minimum for as long as I didn't define good and evil, I even went to the extent of working toward the elimination of it, I knew it could not be done, our ego is our self, it was just the extent of my will. I would push it around, seeking its displacements and the many forms it took inside me, then pushing it again and more, living my life out of nothing tangible in a prison, feeding the famished lion on little mousses; I would give whatever amount of time and intellectual energy needed to control it, until it became my pet. It took me a long time and a lot of thinking to have an idea of its intrinsics, but once it revealed itself wholefully, I understood better why this reality so much revolted me.

As the ego is always contained within a single entity, however complex or grouped, the worst expression it can take before even his own death is total destruction in the name of his own survival. This "knowledge" brings another fact; absolutely no actions against it can surpass the power of its ultimate action. That's what the thing showed me once I finally cornered it. It told me; "see who I am, see my powers, see what I can do, I am this whole universe, I decide everything for I am everything and I can do anything as I possess everything!" but he likes a daring little human pushing and chasing him around, kind of, so we talked at length, I told him he was lying, that he could do nothing else than exist from default immutable laws, that one day he would either be possessed by life or disappear, things like that. He laughed but it seems he found me worthy enough to give me the tools to paint my will on his skin. Maybe he'll start liking us, human life-form, and let us draw our history and future on the infinite vastness of his body. But he despises and destroys competition so we better start seeking a good spiritual way, so we can draw something interesting. Forget about ego pyramids, he invented these to eliminate the likes of himself, he is the ultimate ego, and he truly is the one that possess everything. Do I have to tell you I'm fine in the head? Do I have to tell you it's a romantic vision of a man faced with himself?

And don't try to think this ego thing is new and wow revolutionary, it is the most basic notion in existence, it's not a new concept that appeared out of nowhere. Doing things for self-interests in a world of independent minds will always be a leadership recipe for disaster. As for me, I can't be a leader in this reality except in my writings and maybe on specific things, because what you'll think I should lead into is not good to me, or it doesn't need my kind of leadership, and you take the mean to get what you want; if what you want is bullshit (or anything unrealistic) then you'll get bullshit, which will end-up as a cheap compensation in reality, often a worsening of situation, like wasting energy and resources, you'll be lucky to get hope, or a deal. I can't lead in this stuff because you already have it, and I personally don't like it. Why should I make hell more comfortable? I don't like this reality in most of its facets, and I explained that I can't change its fundamentals without getting rejected one way or the other. Even if I often try to give it it's fair share of defensive arguments, I won't lead hell to its glory for sure, more like the contrary, as a whisper to life, a battle of feeling integrity, in a world of disproportionate egos. When the whisper finally reaches your unconscious I won't be there anymore, you'll just have a grimace from a feeling of mishearing something important, yes, there was that children with a maniac look that nobody noticed at the party...

The worst is that most of the new visions of things I have are dependent on a new reality, but most of these ideas will be uncovered by people with time, and they will be contorted to serve this reality. And while this process of contorting everything is nothing new, it is having its negative effects applied to new present discoveries that are proving more and more that I'm right, and it is used to manipulate people still more, to condemn still more, and it will go on until everything is absorbed for manipulation and profits. So the window of time to follow my leadership is small; the gremlin can feel smart with ideas like mine, but only wisdom and an adequate reality can make good of them...

So I'm nothing beside a history of people manipulating and profiting, as for people, even if I'd turn this world upside down to shake and wake you up, I'd only shake PMBBD, people already overloaded and drowning in "information" and "knowledge", all more mature than me; I'll shake you until all your hairs fall but you'll only wake up to a cerebral concussion ready to embrace hell more strongly than before. What will it take? What are you waiting for? God?

Peaceful protest is the way to go I guess, totally adequate! It is become a normal thing, everybody is used to it, top like bottom, it's part of the democracy-capitalism business as a way to get better work conditions, or to test the system a little, because, you know, there is this bullshit that protest means you have a healthy system, like healthy is a synonym of good, I'm even sure that there is some protest, the ones where anarchists are highly involved, that are under governmental influence, but it's conspiracy theory so I won't talk about that.. Like Greenpeace that has become mostly useless, like green parties. I don't want to give them more troubles than they already have fighting industrials and poachers, but you won't remove the cakes from ego people that way, they'll eventually use enough PMBBD to make you look insignificant; you got to do violent action not to be laughed at, but then doing violent actions are illegal and newsmen would demonize you with crying families...I'm not sure Greenpeace would end-up doing something better setting the laws for life anyways, like an association of Greenpeace with green parties, none of which possess a good life systematization to steer things toward. But I'll try to provide an example people can start working from, that's the project I'm talking about, and that's what missing. Greenpeace could do a lot to move things toward a better vision, it could even update its fight to actual violence, but that would make it Greenviolence no? Maybe we'll have to invent that one.

So you can cry all you want about the seals being killed in Alaska, make the biggest bad trip about a massacre in the history of humanity for those seals while there are a thousand far worst systemized evil going on around the world, your target needs to be updated, your means too, so are your actions, add weapons to your slogans and become Greenpeace terrorists! That should be interesting, fill all the prisons of the whole planet! Pollution and greenhouse effects will kill your seals to extinction, and worse than that, in the end they will be wasted instead of feeding people, and what is the quickest death? There may be too many seals for the ice that is left, will you resize the population and bring us the food, Greenpeace, or will you let them to a slow suffering choking death? We never have enough stuff to eat, we can and want to eat seals, and that's our responsibility not to waste life we kill, whatever behind a gun or through pollution. If Greenpeace is not careful in its fights it will become a stupidity, a bunch of hysterical profiteers, the cruelty argument makes sense as long as there is cruelty, every animal we eat got to die, the fastest way is the best and that's it, do you complain about the way I kill my fishes?

And you become a problem when you are filling a spot without giving results, maybe you'll have to be shut down for something that will bring results because people are limited with your pub stunts to believe you have an effect while it is not the case; move! People know who you are, you have won points, it is time to give glory to the name you have chosen, you want green peace? You'll have to fight for it more strongly. But you'll tell me you are fighting from the beginning no? Then what is this way of fighting? You're using "peace" because you are scared to hurt yourselves? Not enough supporters? Fearful people are strong on peace, get some brave males, since big IQ scientists tend to see themselves too valuable, or too old, associate some life motivated Arabs caracterial factions, make them understand that life is as valuable as gods, minimally, deserts have a tendency to devaluate life. But maybe that wouldn't work. And why didn't you build a kind of life spirituality? With beautiful places to worship life for a start? (I'm not talking about tree hugging) And why are you incapable of associating massively with other protest groups that all boil down to the same fundamental problems?

If you truly want to act consciously, wake-up and fight for life globally, including human life and its desecrated principles like fairness, which is a form of slow torture on life, all the rest are under products. Find the means where there is no consciousness to use them; you believe you're doing good? Then evident evil can fill your pockets, go burglarize Celine's castle! I'm saying stupidities, and I like Greenpeace, in fact, I seriously consider getting involved with them after I'm done with my work, in the scenario where it produces no interesting result, since they're probably the institution that would better work toward a continuation of what is most important to me, giving me added value toward life's advancement, or the betterment of life, without encouraging the system, at my age in the current planetary situation. I wouldn't be there to change them though, I wouldn't even talk about my work, I'd just participate in their activities, but one thing's for sure, I won't embark if they're a bunch of vegetarians...

Without talking about seals, species come and go inside wild life expanses, and those that can't tough a degree difference have been living too long, they are meant to die, they are like old people that we must always be expensively and critically careful around unless they die, interdependence and pressure selection is doing that to humanity too. If we want wild life to keep a good place we'll have to find life ideal environmental cyclic stability, with us at the ton and happy at it. Species that become too fragile in their environment are meant to die, whatever whole ecosystems go down with them, that's the cost of too much interdependence.

The way of life (apart from high consciousness complete species) is for food to climb the food pyramid when it can be made so. For me, life is continually changing and morphing to fill space that is continually changing by the natural process of life evolution itself and external factors. If the environment is adequate, it will adjust to limitations, infiltrating any crack, through a fantastic diversity, until it becomes a somewhat stable, slowly evolving ecosystem of dying and birthing species with a tool; us...

Now, everybody gives a different value to life, you know how I see it, I'm a human with a consciousness and some judgment (I like to think so) an whatever I do, there's no way I'll eat anything else but biomass. I can suppose I'm better eating grass, but if grass's so good, why is it that I'm one of the rare creature to eat almost anything biomass? And why if I eat only greenery I die? I must eat meat and fish or I'll need pills. For me the distinction remains simple; I'm a life "buffer" or more appropriately "equilibrium finder" because I am the sole species to have the power to act as such with enough consciousness and knowledge. I want life diversity and I'll eat anything that takes too much of that or space, so someday I'm going to start hunting cows, particularly the superior ones...Seriously though, I like the taste of wild life, but don't like to see things as a limitation to survival, like I can eat as long as there remains enough of a species for it to reproduce in a place, the oceans have become empty with this mentality, so I eat no wild fishes, and rarely what's produced in fish farms, which, with the current mentality, will get genetically modified for voracity and end-up infesting the oceans...I prefer to limit overpopulation of some species, grow the life bearing capacity of the earth, biomass and biodiversity. As for industrial production, I don't like it either, even if I do eat some, as I wait for the synthetic cow...

One of the uses of consciousness is to control ego in species that won't reach enough consciousness individually in their lifetime to gain control of it, which is still the case for most humans, so maybe people are better be under the illusion that they have what it takes to act independently, yeah, remove them laws and watch things go wild! Wildlife? Gone! And you can bet it's not those who invested their time forming themselves a nice mind who will survive, so yeah, thanks...For now, if you have too many ants you can bring some, I'll make a sote d'fourmilles, it's a shame we don't see these often at the market...and don't forget the boss in there, I eat both bosses and slaves...too many seals? They'll die in planet overheat? Bring some to my table, I'm one of the rare to appreciate the taste, depending how its cooked, simple grounded seal burgers with little bits of onions and celery in it is the best, what else?

I see it as my responsibility to mostly eat greenery and peanuts and beans (then produce methane like a cow), but it is my responsibility to eat a steak too, and this attitude may help lift some limitations created by overwhelming species. So interdicting the hunting of seals is nice, but if they reach overpopulation, or a population that takes too much space from others (can be from eating, directly or indirectly) then we must hunt and eat them and you have nothing to say about it, particularly since limiting their population may leave enough space for new species, even if those may take a long time to start appearing. But that may not be the case for seals, as a matter of fact, you could see ice as space for life, space that is mostly free, or developing because ice is not as easy a space as land. If you prefer, you can see ice as a big boat on which some species may live, and since there is not much else than bears and seals and some other strange quad dimensional animals that you are not sure if they're going to fly, swim or walk, if there is a lot of space on ice, then I say we could try to raise cheptels of some of those like we've always been doing; I already explained that a lot of stable species can easily jump to a human adapted form. We take space and we eat life, we're as well use space that is unused when we can, if things are done well. But maybe ice is not a good idea, but lands to raise beef is no better for sure, or oceans to raise salmons etc...Maybe with ice you'll have to control all facets of raising though, but I'm no expert for sure. Diversity of food is critically important too, that's why we must optimize our most appreciated diversity, which we are doing with the big stuff, for profiting, or raisin wine in diversity, but maximizing food sources diversity and cooking it good get it transmitted at the level and sustainability it is wanted, thus better discovering the truth of our tastes and optimizing our food needs. But that's a long process, and even if I criticize everything, I can say the chain is working, in fact, a lot of things have the base of working well in ego reality, if not, the rich wouldn't have all they want...

I'm not a genius of food and animals though, and it's surely not my tastes that are publicized; fancy and expensive half cooked recipes full of oil are not my type, just looking at a fancy plate cuts my appetite, even if TV people, who don't influence and manipulate us, are image crazy to the point of messing with everything to make "images" with it; image food, with "approved" by scientists tastes and vitamins. I don't eat artist stuff, manipulate my food too much, or protect the vitamin too much and I'll dump it on sight to munch at a piece of cheap bread while doing something more interesting than playing around the plate looking for the imperfection of the, studied by gods, ways of tasting the image recipe. I'm not talking of eating in prepared company, evidently, but too much fancy will still end badly, at least in humor, the same for wine too, I don't want to look in a dictionary or get a school expertise to enjoy it, while the subject is so exhausted it is ridiculous to the point that my glass of wine will end on the wall, bring me carrot wine instead, I'll create the new taste expertise, replace all raisin wine with it, plant carrots all over the earth, replace all wine universities with it until you have no vocabulary to exploit anymore to describe it, only words for my carrot wine will be appropriate, you'll have one for every variations, publicists will talk about it eternally, and guess what? It will have a good property!

Yet, whatever the choices, or selections, or manipulations we make, be it indirectly by manipulating the environment or eating those out of control, or in big quantities, we are the deciding factor for all life-forms growing on this planet. As we become successful, we should logically end-up removing some life limitations and create space for diversity or creativity. In a sense that's what I'm doing in big part with my work, maybe most present people will see it as something negative and dark, but I'm in fact showing how many incredibly negative limitations can be lifted or invalidated to try creating something better, that's positive isn't it? Currently feels like a waste of my time though, but I'm sure some people will appreciate, probably more in the future, if any rag is more interesting to the current selection... I'll be unique among the multitude that got published at my epoch, I'll probably be a discovery of importance, I may as well end-up as the true definition of a visionary event! So whatever you think it is dark stuff because you are stuck in your indoctrination or you feel blamed, and go ballistic in denial, the truth is that I'm slowly lifting extraordinary and invincible limitations right in front of your eyes, the negative people are the ones who don't care. What I do is a work of light, instead of not finding, or stalling, or abandoning, it advances, there is hope, it becomes possible, maybe even reachable. I'm opening this reality, I'm creating overture (not in the sense of sex people), I'm preparing the terrain for the possibility of a different ideal, the most interesting challenge I could find for myself too. I even believe things will be done peacefully, I'm that much unrealistic! But war is not a possibilities I'll discard, it is your choice in the end, not mine, things can be realized in peace if people are associated instead of grabbing at each other's hairs in accusing division and competition.

Now, I like to eat good life, mmm! And I'm not obese, and manipulations from profiteers to eat like a pig don't influence me, so I want it available and not forget I can eat it; I'll say I want some a few times, 2-3, a week. If people didn't exaggerate, I'd have a tendency to believe that not much breeding would be needed for 5 billions people taking a moderate attitude with food, maybe half of our meat production would come from breeding. If we weren't so pressured to eat beef and chicken on "steroids" (I know, I know, they're pure natural clean and all, proven in laboratories, and big like bodybuilders...), we could find equilibrium between industrial production and forest exploitation from acting as efficient equilibrium finders who bring the meat to the market quickly, we could even go back to a more "personal" relation with farm animals since industrial meat is almost food and earth poisoning in the name of profitability.

I've eaten all kind of farm and wild animals in my youth, all excellent, even squirrels, bears, beavers and seals, yes seals, I've eaten them, and strange meat is excellent if cooked the right way. But when I moved to a city I almost became granola, I don't like the "cheap" meat there, as for the expensive stuff, I don't know, not enough money. What I know is that I'm so disgusted of failing my meat eating rages on bad steak that I abandoned and I don't eat it anymore, except some pork and very rarely chicken. For now, there's simply too many people on earth with the country competition, not enough quality food, so if it's not one problem, it's another.

The other thing not to forget is that we have an effect on life around us, we must adapt to it while it adapts to us. Now that we're evident, some ecosystems will become inappropriate; we'll have to wait thousands of years of newfound stability for appropriate ecosystems to be recreated. But for that, wild life must have space (that can be anything; pollution takes space), less limitation. The thing to never lose sight of is that we have to reach back stability while mother earth stays what it is and that's simple; two caps of ice, and a lot of wild greenery between the two. If we lose that we may be in big troubles as surface temperature may go to the extent of changing underground magma currents; that may be far fetched to you, but not to me as I explained in "Life infinite"; the planet is a living thing, action, reaction, what is in a living cell? Matter, atoms and molecules moving and forming different arrangements. What is the earth made of? The exact same thing under a different form.

We must not react after it's done but before; that's why all the energy transformation process of life ends at us, that's why we don't only use recyclable materials, that's why we have these brains and can have that much fun. When there is no more ice it is too late, not only for your seals, but for a lot of us too. You react before it is too late, not after, and don't believe experts paid by governments with statistic saying everything is always a few decennia away because we're toughing it out presently and cataclysms are not hitting home and moose populations is increasing, and, and, and... So go there, and watch that ice and ozone layer, and if Canada interdicts it, then war to Canada, this earth was never meant to be the possession of governments or countries, in fact, unfairly divided countries are a crime against humanity, and country competition is a crime against life.

If we expand desert areas with pyramidal cities expanses (which are far worse than deserts) and asphalt, adding more pollution and heat, we could create a chain reaction for massive death, too much heating and the axle of the planet may get larger and that may in turn grow more desert, eliminating more wild life and greenery and creating more cataclysm, de-axing the earth still more, all kind of things like that are possible.

We shouldn't wait until life becomes irreversibly handicapped, from sicknesses or environmental inadequacy, life is more than ecosystems for hunting and fishing and domesticated animals, so you want to fight for life, you are forced to fight for wild life expanses, and fighting only to get seen is discouraging and doesn't look useful when it lasts too long. And making zoos, even if they are better than nothing, is not supposed to be how we treat life on the planet, the same for reserves.

So for me, Greenpeace don't think global and far enough, only on divided safe facets, and it is worse when news people displace the emphasis to country competition; it's the Canadians or the Chinese, not a life thing. But yes we must deal with this government business; they're the ones that are supposed to have the means to change things, but it seems they're only good to show-off and defend their great democracy, or to go nuts over their good and fair economies, and people, well, people protests for more money, better work conditions, less violence, will they protest massively for some effect on climate change? Why would they do that? They'll end-up paying for it... They need to scare those with the means, in association, they are too used to small divided protests, bums, there's a procession of a different gang doing it in front of their castle at least once a month, candy distribution time and bye-bye, or a police beating maybe? So can they associate to make many groups of 50 000 peoples or more at many places simultaneously and with sustainability? I don't believe so, people can do nothing, and Greenpeace wouldn't sink a ship, oh no! Terrorism, they'd end up in prison! Or some gang like the G7 would revoke their Greenpeace, they'd lunch frigates to blow them up high with their newly developed at great cost by scientists, and now proven to bring benefits to the "civilian world", rubber seeking torpedoes...

Divide and compete to reign, conflict. All those people who try to stand for something good will need to better associate for strength, and understand that peace doesn't impress superior, rich and powerful people. People who care seriously about life and the planet (which should amount to somewhat those who vote for the green party of their place, if you still vote for classics in the current planetary situation, then you are a part of the selection, it may be too late for you. That doesn't mean the green party is a good thing, or would do better governing, it's probably bullshit and it's still condemned to the democracy-capitalism business, but it is there that you may find the highest proportion of people who really care in idealism, stuck voting for a party that will never come to power, or maybe in 50 years...) Those people need to associate on a project that will end many problems in one shot, and protest with enough strength to scare those with the means, either financially or physically, so you understand that peaceful people are secondary to those who are ready to shed blood.

All associated with a Greenpeace that's not scared of some action for something. But does it have an ideal in the first place? I hope so, if not, they're as well being a pyramid brick, and maybe that's what they really are, they're more akin to a police, governments don't need to spend much on watching industrial exploitations, just let Greenpeace and reporters do the job, until it's hidden well enough. In all the time of its existence it should have developed better than a simple protest group traveling around the globe and justifying their existence with pub stunts on the back of , maybe someone is too expensive there...Does it have a direction? A project? An ideal? Something reachable? Not an illuminated thing that is sure to fail? Can they fight such a big thing as global warming? Or life as a whole? Maybe I'm unrealistic, it would need far more people and means, while they shouldn't even exist; if they do it is because governmental leadership is incompetent.

Sure that the selection is not minded for such priorities, you'd have a hard time getting more people on the whole planet presently to defend life than what you can get out of a single city with a professional team of sport entertainment... And you wouldn't beat the effect of such a throng getting out of the stadium to demolish everything if they get too emotive in their hyped entertainment (not much hype for Greenpeace), you know the priorities and dreams of this reality; Greenpeace is far more insignificant in its actions than any team sports with television making a big emphasis, even battling with pillows is more interesting and fun than battling for life, but yes, I could say they're spreading life if you think of the little eggs and larvae in some of these pillows... And supposing that you can wake-up enough people all around the world with a strong enough will to truly fight for something valuable, no chance you'd have the right to demolish like frustrated sport fans without entering into a war, depressing.

Why do you think governments have taken monopoly of violence that can change things? You think peace scares them? Do you really think writing this book will get ego asses moving in a better direction? It's easy to have "express yourselves" as a motto, but it's mostly PMBBD when it's in a competition against gangs who control everything, and there's no laws against subtle and repetitive PMBBD, and they'll make some more with your efforts... The worst is that to move an immutable planetary ego mentality you may be stuck giving a violent lesson to people controlling things, to scare them, but you can bet that for manipulators, fear violence is basic understanding 101, so you can't do that; they took control of those means long ago.

They control violence because they understand how it get people obeying in peace and fear, and they know their way of things is mostly "evil", but they can't, or don't really want to believe things could be far better, they have a place to defend after all. But they still fear violence they can't control the result of. So be sure that they'll provoke it if it serves them in the end, even at a planetary scale, under whatever form, which mean we should always consider that any developing grave situation as a possible manipulation, it's all a matter of means. Remember that manipulation is the top brick of an ego reality, at its top it will wear its prettiest dress like it's a proof that it's not decrepit, so everything will be super pretty on the surface with services aplenty, to satisfy the superficial selection preoccupied by beards, while it is provoking mass death to modify something while passing for the best system, saving humanity from a mess it made itself, I'm not saying it will happen, but if it can be done then I wouldn't underestimate the possibility. That being said, what evil and hell fear the most is for people to start kicking their butt for a better ideal, lose control. What's still more depressing is that their action will probably be to eliminate the chance that it could happens again.

As for Greenpeace, I understand they can't do much, and they are still doing a lot. What's more, it is fragile since they create a little competition now, and industrialists don't like them at all. Doing more could easily get media people who always run in governments fumes to start a demonizing bout, particularly if they cause someone to die. But weapons exist! At the service of those who took unfair means, they have all the weapons and police and army and medias to defend their utopia. But the best way of weapons is that they should be controlled by the best people having a good use or noble use for them; logic say that "good" should be the possessor of weapons, not the contrary, but good people are more peaceful and they don't like as much using weapons and violence, so no way out of it eh! Greenpeace! It's a shame there are no big organization more capable of taking care of life, something with some punch. Everything is compartmentalized, separated and divided, becoming an inefficient subsystem.

Let's arm Greenpeace to the teeth with subs, frigates and copters to "interdict" some exaggerations, and bombers for those industries, (and nukes for respect...). Crazy, but why did no country on earth ever used its army to back up some Greenpeace actions? No eh! When you think about it, they would go completely wild and innocents would die! We'll have to wait for the green helmets and Greenpeace is just that; Greenpeace, an organization fighting just to make pub stunts...disarmed warriors in rubber ships still brandishing slogans after that many years...

For now most sects have far more adepts than them, that's how little we care about life and the future. People have no true fight in them for what makes sense anymore, unless it brings compensation, or self-inflation. Almost pathetic how people don't care, and they clean their ass with moralists... But I'm living in ego reality and I'm always too positive, the truth should be that Greenpeace spends a big slab of its money paying big salaries instead of gaining efficiency. It got a job anyway, and in this reality, personal responsibility toward civilization or life is a very funny thing where you do your job and that's it, and it's understandable for most, they have enough problems to be on the verge of depression.

And people? They can't associate massively on a cause that doesn't end up in ego satisfaction? Consciousness must be a precise and limited thing categorized by some superior gang? Or some make-up to add to one's image? Can't grow one yourself in youth? It's negative? Something to jump over to grab at some pleasures? That's positive? Every consciousness expression must be divided and categorized for better manipulation? You think you're better divided in smaller gangs that await a precise date to do a flash dance so everybody is prepared for peace where everything goes well and nothing truly changes? Sunday protesters for entertainment? Ah! I know, your responsibility is to lean things by heart and do stupid things as old mistakes while adapting. And me, I'm feeling more and more inhuman, and finding too many uses for an army...

Sure that as a global goal there is more than fighting for wild life expanses, reducing the size of the ego competition would bring fantastic changes, even if those effects may be different than fighting for wild life. Doing just that in this reality and most life may survive many more years. One thing's for sure, you can't have a specie that don't need to eat or one that create food or things by magic, it would be illogical and would fail everything immediately, so there is always a cost. Everything is supposed to be cyclic or recyclable, the galaxy is the philosopher's stone of matter, the sun and planets are the philosopher's stone of life, and we are its ultimate extrapolation, but under its limitations, some steps of transformation are incredibly easy for us, other are near impossible.

A high consciousness reaching specie can go to either extremes of ego or non-ego, it is its choice, while insects and microbes are the lowest terra-formers, they're little non ego, you'll find billions of them as soon as there is a possibility, yet all together, they are not worth a single human controlling its ego in non-ego value even if everything is dependent from them microbes. You can guess the worth of ego people copulating like insects, and often insects have more feelings and class in their ways of reproduction and raising of offspring than many humans, and you know what I think of people living on the earth like insects on a piece of food....

But people see platitudes in consciousness development, something to dump over the head quick, or to color their life a little as a manipulation strategy, times are so hard and never enough of it, so let's have a party! It's the job of this system or that, full of interdependent expertise, they got a job to do, laughing people to see, television to watch, maybe reproduce and that's survival for them. Well, I'm generalizing a bit, but I don't meet people who care beyond their interdependent place in the system, just superficially, which can be understandable to some extent, so what can I say? What can I say to get people moving in a different direction when everything have supposedly been said or everything have been supposedly been taken care of? I'm lucky to have revolted in youth? Yes, and it saved my life, whatever your vision of what life is, at least I won't die in regrets or as an innocent.

You know I'm not talking about the exceptions, like me, people like me are not super exuberant; the most valuable stuff is the rarest and most hidden...So I generalize from personal experience, which includes from what I see, and hear, but more personally, even if it's hard to do, I try to judge people internally, mentally, where the truth is hidden as much as visually or from the apparent clues the person can more easily manipulate (I'm not talking about physical and sexual attractiveness here, or fat), all that while wearing my natural candor and gentleman coat, to better reveal manipulators and see their reaction at being wrong about me. Anybody have a good shot at showing me what they do with their ego unless your reputation is proven. But I have, among many other things, a lot of trouble with adulthood, which I see as the general age at which most of the loss of innocence, toward the reality you live in, is supposed to have taken place and when consciousness can work the person more directly. I put this age at around 25 (around is + or – 5 years).

You are not an adult when all you do is accept, tolerate and adapt to everything coming from higher up, or any system in place, then complain among friends. Your judgment got value when you are concerned, you're supposed to have a value associated to it where you can help decide things that concerns people like you. Always letting other people (can be representatives) control you or your mind and decide things in your place is skipping your human responsibility (I'm not talking about personal or even work situation). When your actions affect life negatively (can be others), whatever directly or indirectly through a system, you have a responsibility in it, you are not a robot.

This "I do my job" or "I don't care" or "neutral" attitude contributes to create the pressure selection which, over thousands of years, can have disastrous effects on a civilization. People will become specific tools that dump a lot of their mind skills in favor of an expertise, following blindly the ways and laws of the reality while displacing their frustration everywhere except the true source. Naturally, this is the way of this reality, and it's another reality invalidating argument (or a self condemnation if you prefer, something critical we could have done differently, but we "choose" (by encouraging wrong leadership and systemizing it) the wrong way of doing it and we raised civilization with it as part of its foundation), so it is too late, the motor is built and the only option to change things is either a new motor alongside it, or smashing it to build a new one, while everything in the history of humanity to date have been invested in it...so you won't smash it, particularly if you're well served by it, you'll tough it until it stop totally, but then you'll wake up to the nightmare you created of the earth and of the human, and you'll have to rot in your crap until you disappear. All that to say you got to think by yourself, if you can't do that you're not worth much, and it is easy to make a depression in such a situation. What's more, the kind of people who call themselves "neutrals" or who don't care and just try to enjoy the world or profit from life, they are in the wrong camp; there are no neutral people, those don't exist, your actions dictate what is your weight in the balance, you always move one side or the other because you always act, you always decide, neutrality is inexistence, 0.

Too much acceptability or susceptibility to manipulation can create a wheel of mental disability that can eliminate skills from a reality, even generally, like general judgment ability. This may be exacerbated by a history of lacking influence in many matters, the example of that at a smaller scale would be a matriarch or patriarch family. The process of recuperating from this is very hard, but the minimum is that people gain back the means to have a valuable influence in matters that is of concern to them, and for that you may need to "force" the system to give more worth to your opinion.

That's about it for my opinion of this system, I could go a lot more profoundly to describe all the ugly of this reality, but then I would be doing far too much unconstructive conspiracy theorizing. Even at the constructive level I did thing it's probably too much for most well invested fearful people who are not supposed to dwell in this without going defensive or denial or rejection. Even me don't like to dwell in this, but I got to explain and justify, if not then there is no use or potential trying something else. Personally I did this just for you, me I always knew as a feeling that things were no good and I'd become bad embarking, as a kid, and I remained a kid, even if justifying another way would make me far more of an adult, even with my candor, than the people of this reality who think they must teach me how to live so I can become an adult like them by taking important responsibility, like being responsible for developing hell further... You could say it's comforting for them to embark everybody, that way they can't be wrong, if not then the pressure selection should make inferiors out of the competition, but this stupid mentality is an affront to the greatest tool of life for evolution that I will always fight, all the way to afterdeath if I must; crushing those who you fear could prove you wrong is in fact proving you are wrong and ready to be crushed! Not only that, but you disrespect and handicap not only life and evolution, but the effort of the rare aspects of life who try to do the most fundamental work of life, something that is sure to make jealous well invested people who limited their vision to profiting or adaptation, but you can't have everything so fuck you, I didn't invest my time doing what you did, and you sure didn't invest yours to reap my life!

As a young man I didn't need any more than the simplest vision to deduct that this world was no good for me. Maybe I can thank my parents for that, or religions, but even when I thought I was wrong to be revolted, even when I really tried to embark and be a good citizen, I was quickly back to finding justifications to hate and revolt, in fact, I'd have been a criminal if I hadn't taken the quest of using my brains to explain and find a path where I could understand without feeling I had a problem for the rest of my life, and that has been super hard until now, seriously, robbing a bank would have been far easier, or killing a bunch of psy, I'm just lucky I found out I had all the qualities to do something more constructive, and decided to define good and evil in a way that made sense. So I decided this world was hell, with its happy little dependent specialist gremlins workers, its big Lucifer like government, religious bosses, under bosses lying, manipulating, killing, stealing, bullshitting, twisting the minds, and getting all the admiration of their indoctrinated gremlins, throngs of sold to the devil men and women "prostitutes", adding to the party of open legs monster fucking, life blood sucking, baby making extravaganza.

I'm not exaggerating a little, I have no choice but to conclude that things are no better but worse after developing my opinion, than I initially believed, so here I am, I'll take a last stroll in this mud, I got too much ammo left, and too bad I'm on foot (alone), no adequate friends exist it seems. As for love, I would have liked to find an attractive girl to help me battle my way through this, but my life developed inappropriately, and would I find somebody with the qualities to be clean of hell's influences? Someone not making its contribution, someone not demolished or twisted for trying? Some do have the potential to make me dream, or float, but potential is good for dreaming, and it's a good place for PMBBD and vampires too, and once you've been through it, you're too much trouble for me. But yeah, it's my problem, always too easy for me to be too difficult...Even if I know there are many who got my kind of opinion on things, my choices are still limited to mentalities fitting the standards of a reality I don't like, there's something for all the thousands of steps of the pyramids, revolted girls like me that kept integrity? They are as hidden as me I guess. The selection and adaptation process leaves almost nobody like me standing in the clear, or standing with their integrity intact, all sold to the devil one way or the other... Divide and compete to reign. The truly mentally different people didn't reproduce well, or were not encouraged to, through our history; they are rejected or treated as enemies and they hardly exist anymore. When, by luck, one happens to see the light of the day, he is broken, and crushed in all kind of ways, particularly under competition and PMBBD pressures, before he reaches adulthood, then he may backfire and surrender his famished ego...

If you don't contribute one way or the other you will bear the blindness of the masses; you will be made the evil one on whose shoulders will repose all the evils of this reality. You will be an enemy that contributes to keep the reigning ego gods in their place so you too will be useful to their order of things. And you better not kill, only them can do it, they control all the weapons, all the defense, all the argumentation, all the workers, all awaiting the command to contribute to mass killings if they must, to protect their ego gods ideals, to keep the ego competition going, and don't think the media indoctrinated selection that can't be wrong wouldn't want it, they're itching to kill troubles, and it can't be themselves for sure, we are lucky they're under the control of many institutions and they got tons of entertainment, and governments will only do it if they calculate it is worth it, or if they end-up as saviors.

The more we are happy in hell, the deeper in hell we plunge, the less chances we have to reverse things. Weak people find ways to be happy in hell, some only need to stroll through pretty or impressive facades, a pretty something this way, a pretty something that way and their soul is sold to the devil. Others do the same thing only to look pretty, someone would drop dead and the smile would hardly falters. This one has found a way to never stop being praised, his name is known worldwide. This other one only needs to take some drugs on weekends, or watch pretty, happy and true television, or chat over the internet or fuck. Others need some action this way or that, or surface illusions of evil, so they feel in better harmony with their black heart. The ways to sell your soul are infinite, find some, and dependences are among the best ones.

To make you his gremlin, Lucifer will smile at you full teeth, he'll show you wonders without telling you they were built by the same worker slave you'll become, he'll give you some candy chocolate with alcohol then he'll sodomize you, and the more fight you have in you, the more tools he'll use on you, until he find a way for you to like it, then you'll be of no interest to him anymore, you'll be his gremlin, 99% of your descendants too, he'll control you all one way or the other into contributing to hell. Soon there will be no places to hide from him and his billions of adapted gremlins defenders, they will be everywhere you go, and your only escapes will be the ones he's provided. I will never accept to work my life out for this hell and its bosses, and if I get more comfortable or get some money, it won't be while encouraging it for sure, it is my certitude, I see it as the minimum I must do to cover the possibilities I believe in, to be on the side of life and the universe, to feel human, responsible, and to die with a smile of pride and peace of mind, as far away from innocence as I could go, with a little candor...

There's a lot of ugly all over the world, more than I'll ever be capable of knowing or deducing, while governments develop all kind of secret technologies to keep an advantage, control, deal with any risk. We are shipping millions of containers of used electronics to countries having so many people and so poor nobody cares or notices if they die of all kind of sicknesses from turning gigantic mountains of our scrap to bring some profit to their bosses, some don't even know how to read, and a lot of women have lives that don't make sense either. All this is well known and accepted by all good democratic countries of the earth, nothing new, even normal for "emerging" great powers, "developing" countries that will eventually become like great America, with all its positive attributes...So they won't talk about it, and businessmen continue profiting from it.

The same for jeans, which I see as an exploitation symbol of the smallest, less ego, less strong physically people, the Chinese woman. So I very rarely buy jeans, 2 pairs in 20 years, because I don't like the industry. No Some will say I'm not much of an example when I eat industrial meat, and yes, I'm not proud of that so I make a small prayer to say I'm sorry, in my way, but what can I buy with my means? Particularly when I don't like "marque" stuff and wear other people's clothes? I'm a bit stuck with industrial production. Jeans is more like a symbol to me, particularly blue jeans, but I try to limit useless consumption on everything, I'm a super example at that, like for the fast food industry of clothing; I spent maybe 500$ in clothing in the last 20 years, that's hard to beat, but I just don't wear clothes often and clean them at hand, so they stay brand new, and I move every few years so nobody get used to my limited collection, which I seems to choose well enough to never end up out of personal fashion. I run away from stickers, logos, and particularly signatures which I like applied to unique items only. I see the people wearing them as hype products, walking pub meant to help the democracy-capitalism business. That's what evident stickers and signature production means to me, not quality; I'll never carry myself as a pub campaign.

As for the bullshit quality argument, quality stuff don't need a sticker carried by people for publicity, it need good people out of profiting emphasis. If your main goal is not profiting from people but to produce something good for them, then you will create quality, understand that? And with a pub spot not imposed, you won't need stickers to over hype your stuff and create gangs, or protect it as a patent to create a bill gate monopoly for profits; but I already explained how wrong that is, that knowledge and information should always be free to grow creativity or to make things less expensive, but it doesn't work in this reality, you need to defend your stuff like ego people or you'll gain nothing worthy from your creativity.

I didn't say there cannot exist quality levels more expensive, I'm talking about ego, I'm talking about my needs as a poor person and I'm talking about publicity; someone who bought an extraordinary pair of jeans knows where he took it, he don't need a sticker or logo, so either you attach those with a rope I can cut, or I don't buy. Even if it is the case for most of all clothing, for me, jeans is the supreme symbol of unconscious acceptation of misery or imposed inferiority; it cost less than 1$ making a pair of jeans, and it is sold 20$ minimum, who gets the money? The maker? Even if you paid people at the minimum salary, which is still not enough for me, to make jeans that "respect the worker" (you're very low when you have to "respect the worker"), I would not believe you, because publicists made scrap with their jobs, they have totally lost their credibility, even if they do "cute" ads at the tons and stamp pandas and energy stars everywhere, then sell them 35$ or more; no way they would make less profits! Impossible! That would be totally against their philosophy!

This brings me to copying, I'm against anybody hiding or protecting knowledge for profiting, whatever it cost a billion to create the new knowledge, once it exist, it should be available to everybody. The exceptions to this is unique work and evil danger, both of which applies to my work; unique, and evil can use it to manipulate and profit, worse if I actually give it and I don't even profit from it myself...

The people who make jeans are not even treated as animals, they are treated as robots; machinery! A big slab of Chinese women is raised as production tools, in other countries millions of women are raised for prostitution, and the ones who profit the most from this are higher, they are rich, almost untouchable, their actions are perfectly legal, accepted, tolerated.

All the evils I describe in my work are accepted and tolerated by people. At the minimum people should do many little independent things to increase their worth, stand for something, give yourself some symbolic view, where is your independence? Where is your will? Where are your principles? You take all this on the internet now? You wait for any trend that can make you look good without a price and embark like a bunch of hysterics? Yeah, proving you lost your mind somewhere along the way, it has become a manipulated dependent thing; the global net of independently associated mind failed, we're ants, military platoons doing flash dances, and PMBBD is the cause.

We did it in big part with entertainment hype; people move and spend en masses more to see senseless unfair millionaires singers and sportsmen, they move far more for personal fun than to build a better ideal and world for future generations, we have abandoned children while thinking the contrary, and condemned them to a reality coming to the end without a chance of recuperation, and one clue among many that point to this is that we have unconsciously arranged everything to revolt the youth we "love" so much, that way we'll make them responsible for the coming failure.

The responsible is not the innocent child that die out of breath in the burning house, it is the one that put the house on fire and waited, even enjoyed, and stopped everybody from trying something because it's too risky for their personal possessions or beliefs, or this profiting gang or that, until everybody feel bad for not acting to form a group to overtake the "evil" ones. And whatever the fire was lighted by the child playing with matches, it is adults and reality that are responsible for failing to care and grow children adequately, there are no king children, only failed adulthood, well adapted innocent adults, and love incomprehension. A civilization is raised around what can a children do, they are the future, not the old selection that had a lifetime of adaptation and wouldn't miss a chance to vote in their best system. And that means democracy-capitalism is totally inadequate to find the best path of humanity, it's just a reinforcement of the ego path, but the selection sure won't act like they got to systemize the best way for the future, they'll systemize things the way of the most ego people instead.

There is always someone lower than you on the pyramids, a lot of "superior" people "love" to think the poor are at their place, some are even proud of that, they want people to believe that the poor like their situations, that they're worth it, or that everybody is the same under the same situation anyway so what of it? It is all bullshit and I'm the proof of that, and who will arrange this never ending PMBBD to self-enslavement with open mouthed admiration? I will never be part of this so called civilized reality, particularly when I think of its history, how can accept to be a part of this? Or encourage any form of continuation of it? A life and death problem for me, but surely not for "normal" people...

It pisses me off that people don't revolt, that they tolerate, accept and adapt to the ways of this reality with open arms as long as there is something with a "new" sticker and a superstar walking the red carpet. What percentage of all those billions upon billions of people judged the world they'd have to encourage when they reached adulthood? How many truly revolted seriously? So I guess it's all my problem, since a god is supposed to change things for people if they don't do it...

This massive unfairness example of jeans is almost a compliment, a joke beside the amount of accepted horror that is going on around the world just as you read this, and people just know it! So no pardon, no innocence argument! You don't care about this, only superficially for manipulation, and you know it, you do the hypocrite ignorant in the name of hiding how fearful you are, scared to death of losing anything you invested some of your money or energy on, your mental construction, scared to fight for something that doesn't end-up in ego satisfaction. Anyway, you'd need to sniff cocaine to be brave enough to truly fight for something good, but you'd probably end-up bragging around trying to glorify your bravado, a worthless fight and a fucking shame. Anyway, why would you seriously care about unfairness or other people's misery when you got many pains on your own? When there is so much ugly stuff and pains in your wonderful system that you got a thousand causes to sink all your energy or money in for eternity? When your energy only prevent governments from taking their responsibilities? When your work mostly ends-up paying profiteers or people with exorbitant salaries? And what can I do? There are an infinity of justifications to defend anything, change religion or find yourself a peaceful guru if your conscience is unsatisfied, have fun, the battle is lost in advance.

People have developed a tendency to boost their emotions on hype until they crack, thinking it means they're alive or good, a lot to manipulate others, (particularly true for singers), while psy are waiting around every corner to profit from those extremes to distribute their wisdom, or bottle of pills, setting people's minds in their right direction. In the end you got smiling concentrated zombies as well as hysterics on hype and the whole lot serves nothing positive to make a truly better world. So you look at the pains of others in the news and say a learned by heart "it's terrible", some will cry but everybody dump it immediately unless they fall in depression. It's not near you or emphasized by the media crackpots, so poof! You forget it or use the "poor bastards" to create conversation or whatever small talk, your compassion don't last unless someone under your godly umbrella lived a similar situation.

I'm not talking about personal pains and loss, and I'm not saying not to prioritize your circle, I'm saying the ones who don't care about others except their close circle, or do for superficial manipulation, are not really caring about life, and they are a problem at that, whatever they work like crazy. So, as an adult, are you a human with a heart with free emotions, or a robot with push button orgasm capability to whom we dictate choices and measures for attitudes? We need to draw you a line where your emotions stop cold? Compartment those as cultural things? You can't put yourself in the skin of someone of another color without pushing a switch of recorded emotions that don't make sense? You want systemized emotions and feelings? Where are those lasting emotions that will push you to fight some monsters? Too risky for your health or your money or your friends or your house or your car? You're a selection of no personal consciousness? Your life fights must always end-up with "likes"? You fight to de-culpabilize? You see most negative emotions and feelings as obstacles to jump over to get at some pleasures?

A lot of people pass their time ignoring the shit they run in, in their quest to grab at pleasures and dependences, no need to truly fight misery, just give the illusion of doing it, the illusion that it touches you, like politicians visiting a place where something bad happened and making too much efforts to look touched or revolted, people have become politicians, image means too much.

Anyway most just learned to "love" violence or misery and troubles, proven by the amount there is on television, while some "think positive" people will say that what we don't know don't hurt us so they'll skip it like it doesn't exist, closing their senses to it so they can keep on "loving" their reality. The rest simply "love" it, they "love" to sit in front of their television and watch the live show of horror they are creating by their hard work. What's more, like we're not in enough shit, they must absolutely prove they understand nothing by insulting them; you would like to make a game of hunting those drug addict who try to escape this reality or that got entangled in its version of survival, you don't want to understand their lives or question your reality, you are scared of true compassion, you want violence and crazy young people so you can feel superior and "good" because you decided to fit well, while they are inferiors and "bad", and when they'll scrap something because they feel cheated, you'll be out with a broom ready to clean their mess, proud like a soldier defending his country against evil.

You can't discern good and bad if it doesn't pain you? You need to be told what is good and bad? You only see it on the surface as a visual thing, no imagination? No valid reasons why some young people want to kill and destroy? Only those that are part of your selection with its government have such justifications? And what if there can't be justifications anymore because media people and manipulators and experts twisted everything? What if it is worthless to talk or write for sense because they'd look stupid and you can't understand in your blind vision of things? Or you'll twist everything they say to your vision? What if all what is left for some people to express their frustration from your incompetence is destruction? How deep in shit are you now? You are the problem! Maybe you're indoctrinated out of your mind believing you defend the best and only system! And who, pray tell me who, will revolt? You? And how, pray tell me how, will you do it? What if the only ones who have the mentality to fight for a better way are some young or poor or revolted full of problems? And what if they have to cripple your unfair financial machines to do it?

At least, in front of your screen, they can be of some entertainment. How can I put some sense in your head enough to wake you up and fight this hell you're creating when you "love" it so much you work for it with almost all your energy, when you watch your television and your internet to stay completely brainwashed to keep on going, unconsciously growing and intensifying your culpability by considering everyday as a new life full of quick emotional soaps between your hard work. And that's what reality, beside your work and family, is for you; soaps, and television is truth (almost). You always could do something but you never did, I'll insult you no end for no use, I'll split my head in four to wake you up to no avail. Your heart is an invention to last a life in nationalism comparisons, and you work so hard and you are so proud.

It's a shame I can justify people's ways in the face of this reality, it's hard to hate when you know you could have taken the same path, so I give you the benefit of the doubt and instead of killing everybody, I say that I hate the members of this reality proportionally to self-inflation, but I try to do better, so I do it proportionally to a definition of evil attitudes, with justifications, explanations, nothing free...And I tell my opinion without licking asses, more like the contrary; kicking everybody's asses out from their happy little ass licking and ass fucking hell!

I told you you'd hate me so stop complaining put that book where it belong; in the pile you want to forget, you're good at that, selective ignorance, willful or ego innocence! How would you live in your reality if you didn't ignore, forget or pardon? What do you need to forget? One hour? Unless there is a very bad thing that happens at work, in your family or your country. No, 5 hours, that's why news people repeat the same news 4 times a day, and a week later they still act like it's fresh news, but I won't start against them, newsmen methodology is an opportunity for never ending rambling from my part, correcting their phrases, remove their twisted manipulations and emphasizes...Yet, as soon as the television and internet start going nuts about some cataclysm, tons of people suddenly find a reason to show how good they are helping others while their unconscious, day to day, attitude contributes to cause so much misery it totally invalidates their effort in irony...

This push button robotic hysteria is another sign people have become superficial tools, a result of psy science in big part, even if most can be sold to the devil simply by planting them in front of a screen that can provide them a daily dose of emotions, a few clicks or channels away and you are ready for another day...And sorry for you if you accepted television or the internet as your survivability tool, or exemplary device of truth, or your guru, so much you plant it in front of your children so they can become like you, too lazy from working blindly to think freely, the selection that would die in depression without a skewed version of reality, visual maniacs who think wow, new and big, those highly and terminally limited people on hype who can only look at the pretty and positive things in life, who profit from it to the maximum, who steer away from pessimist people, big eyes limited to seeing pretty, big brains limited to thinking profit.

Enjoy your placebo of sanity and happiness, all the way to form the pressure selection at the price of those who refused it, but don't forget that lifetime expressions may take 10 000 years to show, a placebo can last many thousands of years, transmitted in genetics, transmitted through communication, until time and truth replaces the placebo by exhaustive pain, whatever the form, which can be the elimination of those who were brave enough to look at the truth of things...One day truth totally devaluates any boost from bullshit and the price to pay is overwhelming beside the temporary advantage.

Now there is not much potential to change this anymore, so I'm moralizing for nothing. You can do changes, toward making hell a better place to be, more accepted, for some categories of gremlins to feel better, but for anything fundamental you need to start little and grow through many hundred years, and this reality aint got that much time, so it must get smaller while birthing a virgin land now. The present reality is a result, it is done, not new, old, old philosophy invented by old civilizations that were not modern, then grown with defenses like religions over many millennia to the point where today, a vast majority of people work in the wanted direction, as the selection that fit the philosophy, whatever fundamental forgotten flaw of logic. And socialism has nothing to do with that, I'm talking fundamentals, not homosexual acceptance, the ego gods ideology, ego competition, country competition, sex competition, pyramidal money flow, systemized unfairness, exploitation of people, emphasizes of means circulation, all in all ;the developing system, whatever the steps and forms it went through with history. The best adequate people who were never left in peace to think about it have come up with are feeling that this system will eventually lead to some kind of grave failure, thus the tendency to see the end of the world coming, and since there is always enough pressures to steer the best brains to something more valuable to ego people, like entertainment or ways to better condemn others, and there is enough pressure selection to turn the worst psychopath around into a crying baby, then the best you can get are crazy sect leaders or dictators.

We'll need to start over with a group that follows a different way in vast majority, motivated people, not fake, then develop civilization anew with them, grow an independent reality where influences from negative pressures of this reality are limited. But you can develop hell seriously by making of survival your reason for living, that way you are just an animal trying to survive as long as possible, which we may have been doing for far too long already...

I choose the path of another reality since I see it as the only solution of fundamental changes that could permit the survival of humanity's potential past the next 100 years. Another reality is probably the last chance we have left before massive death, maybe even before the end, and we have to start working on this now. But you know how things are, you don't ask peacefully a rich to involve the means he took otherwise than as an investment for more future gains, and they are gods, they know it all, they are at their best place, you are inferior, they have the police and the army, you got a baseball bat. So whatever the project you bring to the table, if you think they'll do something just by asking, or that you'll easily remove their means and tell them to get another job, you're mistaken, they took control of everything, we'll probably have to massively, globally turn around and clear them at the mittens in their WW3 riposte while surviving, sorry for peace and love people stuck in the 60's, we're in 2000.

I can make the affirmation that involving the means they took (whatever those are) to birth a new reality is more than their last chance, it is taking a suicidal risk when considering their extraordinary incompetence in doing things in their best way toward life's advancement. They refuse this one and they will have to be destroyed, all those who took the means to control this or that, particularly those using PMBBD on masses. Then we'll have to raise civilization anew while fearing and demonizing ego attitudes so much it becomes a genetic property.

When I'll be finished with my work they'll have reached their maximal incompetence, hidden under pretty visuals and tons of bullshit evidently. If I can pass that many years hidden in silence while things degenerate while they're supposed to get better, if I predicted all this that long ago, if within all that time fundamental attitudes didn't change except superficially, superficial consciousness, image, PMBBD abilities etc, then I'm more right in my judgment that even myself want to believe. If this is what they accomplished in the last 30 years, then governments have only been a profiting institution like a religion, and the best ones are just on a quest to make democracy-capitalism invincible while spreading it as the best planetary wide. I say we are better not evolve than evolving in this way, I'd prefer a planet full of resources developing things in a good manner than a mostly exploited and polluted planet where life is dying in our willful ignorance and fears with people in misery everywhere admiring and envying the rich.

It's a shame I have to think like that, I should feel appreciated for caring about life and the planet, useful without hassle, worthy, peaceful without efforts, caring of the people around me, enjoying life, I shouldn't be hating, thinking about destruction, fearful of the end at the hands of evil. Yes evil, if evil exist, is it possible to be more evil than that? Do you need examples, all these sects where people all die are examples, old pyramidal civilizations are examples, what more do you need for good and evil to make sense and exist? When this civilization will crumble, will you finally acquiesce that we could have done far better, that we could have tried something different, that we could have chosen a better path, right, wrong, worst best, good bad, everything is a matter of choices and exploration of possibilities, and that's just a fraction of all what make good and evil, principles, philosophies, mentalities, spiritualties, money, publicity, entertainment, I have shown that almost all what humanity stood for until now could have been systemized toward a far better vision.

Why do we have so much police, military personnel, machines, bombs, mass death weapons, PMBBD? Because we are run by good peaceful people? Because the system is the best? Because we're overwhelmed in "love"? Because religions are good? What good uses? Country competition? I don't see that as good. To control population? They need that for sure, and tons of PMBBD... Protect us from aliens? That doesn't happen very often, but yes, we'd be worse than worthless to aliens for sure. Ah, I found, to help make a better or different way, protect it!

So they won't try something new if they don't become or stay rich or in command, they'll mess around for as long as they can. You have to tell them with violence that you want another way, but you'll discover that they sleep with a charged gun in both hands, you just embarked in their killing games where they set the rules. If you try to kick them, they'll be terrorized and imprison you for not being peaceful, or they'll tag you a terrorist. They'll declare war, direct or hypocrite, to anything that is a risk to their status, to the point that they are ready to exterminate the human race in their superiority so much they believe they are indispensable in their power-trip psychosis, and worth all their cost including structures and advantages. Who do you think will have the sense to stop before it is too late? Those rich or controlling crazies? No way, evil knows no limits, they'll even sing you a love song as you die, it's people who have nothing to lose that will stop, even if that sounds counterintuitive.

They are armed to destroy the earth I don't know how many times and it's never enough, they need more for their country competition, and guess what is their greatest enemy? Another system that can be competitive! Why do you think they need to have the capacity to kill everybody 10 times over? Because they are good and fair competitive people? So benevolent their biggest emphasis of spending of resources and life energy is for competing or killing others? The more powerful, the more mass killing capacity, very important, exemplary leadership is like that! Ah, I know I'm the stupid moron, I don't even have a single fan while they are popular planet wide, got to be, with the second biggest investment of resources and life energy of the rich and powerful; PMBBD. Exemplary people like that wouldn't exist without such an industry!

Good people don't arm themselves to destroy all life, and defense is a very limited argument in this, you don't need the power to destroy the earth to prove you can do great harm. The capacity to kill all humanity is not a shield; it is a weapon, and it's goal is proportional to its size, the capacity of destroying a humanity that want another way than what they decide is its main goal of use. There are many uses, but the two main ones are a fear message; "do as we say, be lawful, whatever your size or form, be it country competition or inside revolt, since we are insane enough to destroy the whole planet if you try to impose a different order than ours". The other is "we are gods, so invincible the whole humanity of people cannot beat us, we decide what to do with resources, we decide the life or death of humanity, if something doesn't satisfy us we have god veto, if we fail in our dreams, we bring all humanity with us in death, vote for one of us now". Me? I say everybody who is embarked in this and encourage it should reap hell, since this is their paradise vision, what they believe in with all their energy to the point of extinction.

Yet, when we'll be stuck fighting in this hell, who will die, who will suffer? It won't be like in movies, the good people I like will die, the best, you think ego people got built all this armament to suicide with it? Maybe if they want to wake-up their selection, but it's the innocents who are opening their eyes who will sacrifice and die, good people I want to help will reap trauma, all kind of people which would discover me as a friend, people I could fall in love with will die proudly ignoring their future, and there will never be enough space to contain my rage, and my hate for unfair people will transcend even death.

So to those who invented themselves the list of the richest people on earth, like it's some kind of wonderful competition goal to reach so you can thrive and be happy, like it's a proof that you're the best or good, a success story, know that you have the greatest and most profound negative effect on people, life and the planet that exist in this solar system by the sole amount of life energy you found the way to control and spend toward your priorities, and you're proud of that? And good people are low or lost enough to accept that? Oh it's true, they are a reflection of their representatives...

I'm so disgusted when I see people bragging about the money they took and the people envying them, that I think I'll reincarnate in a virus that kills in function of the wishes for money! But no, I'll waste my power, I'll keep it to insufflate love in the next high consciousness specie instead, I don't need to make such threats to a specie that is taking the means to suffer death in the worst manner by itself... And since the chimpanzee is still there, the human form can appear again, no? Since the human form is perfect in my opinion. As for what is the cause of its failure, it's a selection failure, or a failure from life systems to realize to the most fundamental high consciousness principles; love, truth and fairness. Earth life failed at the step of acting from consciousness (empathy). It's a shame because I believe the present human is probably the greatest specie of this universe, so it is entirely a selection failure, we failed to select out of true love, we encouraged manipulation profiting and competition as the most valuable human properties.

Maybe I'm wrong, I'm another kind of human that doesn't understand this retarded version, like the Cro-Magnon versus the Neanderthal, my mind works differently, and I try to understand a reality that is not made for my type, maybe extraterrestrials would think like me...It takes one blockage not to see that your whole world, your whole intelligence and evolution is on a path of self-destruction, even if you build big cities for your illusion of security and have entertainers every corners, you're nothing, entropy, and it takes one handicapped species to fear looking at its ugly, to systemize itself to invalidate adequate judgment.

You can go ahead and tell me I'm the problem, I know you don't like my kind of speeches, you know better than me, but I'll sacrifice my person against your hell until you are worth your human title. Embark everybody by cheating, twisting and manipulating all you want, I'll still be there, the point where you fail, I won't become like you, I will become something else and you will be my enemy! We can both shoot each other bloody wishes, normal, since I'm some kind of other high consciousness life-form that understands that there will be more after me, I want humans past the universe, when I fear my attitude may be negative to future good people, I automatically make efforts to understand and change, I continually think of others, whatever I'm alone under social assistance, whatever happened to me, I still strive to help, and instead of finding example proportional to where money is, I found my disgust, revolt, hate and disrespect grow proportional with where money is, I found no good examples, so I should destroy until I die, but I'll try to keep on doing the comprehensive. 1/4

Is it the Neanderthal that couldn't reproduce with you? (Kind of inconsistent with a few other scientific final truth) Then I'm someone like him, what you hated of him is back with a vengeance, he was right to be a life gods creature, you were wrong to be an ego gods creature. I wonder how many differences disappeared by the ego competition to extinction attitude... And don't think you'll find their skeletons; evil erases its traces while taking the role of a saint... In fact, maybe we should not write our history solely from the skeletons traces we find, there is nothing to tell they were not left for exactly that; to make history. You think they didn't have the intelligence to know they could influence others by manipulating the tracks they left behind? I bet it happened right from the start, even some animals do it. And that's particularly true if they were enthralled in their god view, I don't doubt they could have left manipulated traces of their story to fit their god view. I'm sure someday we'll be in for a lot of surprises witnessing our true historical path, and I think we'll have a hard time recovering from the truth of it, all the evils and death on life, all the horrors, from fucking-up the truth of ourselves until our judgment is incapacitated, while religiously enforcing our view final truth.

Wasn't there a race of little people that lived a few hundred years ago and got themselves into a genocide? They lived the worst life possible in some mountain cavern, eating raw food, but villagers down the mountain started spreading from getting new tools, they took more and more food from the mountain until the little people were dying from famine, and since those villagers were too ego and hated the little inferiors, they never helped or gave them food, and when those smaller people "stole" some of "their" food, the villagers had the perfect justification to massacre them all to extinction and burn the remains, yes, burn the remains, why? You think they are the only ones in our history to burn the remains of their massacre to manipulate history?

Maybe it is all bullshit since there is no way to be sure of anything these days, but I don't doubt we could act the same way (no it is not human nature, it is how we developed from pressure selection, from example, forced violently at the beginning, forced democratically today, we always have been manipulated to admire the best manipulators until we're like this and like that), so all those who boast we never attacked differences to extinction should really look at such examples, which is quite recent, think of how we may have acted a hundred thousand years ago. As for their skeletons, we didn't find them everywhere, only a rare few, why? History in an ego reality is always manipulated and emphasized to encourage or glorify show offs, and there are all kind of ways to erase those that don't fit the story, and probably that's why you don't find other strange skeletons, they got burned, the crime scene cleaned, or burying them was an insult to god.

And their elimination is very recent, not some race that disappeared many millions years ago. Scientists continually try to make us believe all different humans forms died by themselves millions of years ago while only us survived, and we never eliminated someone, they all died because they weren't the same as us. I bet there have been quite a few that have been eliminated by us, as valid as ourselves, particularly when you think life can make dinosaurs, but no gods to burn dinosaurs bones, and what did they hide those dinosaurs? Don't forget that extinction or death is not an end for life, the dinosaur line is still there, just not appropriate anymore, an old sense of life as well as a transformation step, and now far better forms are possible. Maybe you don't when I involve life systems in things, but they still disappeared and it is us that rule today, a far better form.

We have destroyed many humanoid forms as valid as ourselves because of their differences, from some racism arguments, or any insignificant difference, particularly with a developing god belief, but when you see life systems like me you can say that their spirit is still there, and spirits haunt evil people. As for our Neanderthal ancestors, ancestor with whom we, strangely, couldn't reproduce with; were they aliens? Or are we the aliens? Or were they both creature of life, and scientists are worth a severe slap to set their mind back straight? And what about the evolutionary thing where people start almost like a chimpanzee and "straighten" and lose fur, grow hairs and never stop getting taller? What is that stuff? Ah, god made the chimpanzee in his image, and his feet tall little chimpanzee straightened to become a full blown 4 feet chimpanzee, then he came to earth in his vessel and birthed a branch like himself that grew to become human. The chimpanzee appeared, while the human didn't appear but grew? If I'm to believe a story with inconsistencies, then I'm as well invent my own, and I prefer to believe life birthed many forms and one massacred many others because it had more of a tendency to make power trips, they were more appropriate to develop as an ant civilization with a leadership that can fuck with anybody, those who refuse died. Their victims got their history wiped because they wanted to compete and take everything, be credited everything, be sole in existence, the winner, like Christianity, or the democracy-capitalism business.

That's credible to me, I don't discard possibilities; even some form of high pilosity Adam and Eve may be possible. Life's evolution may be limited to the Darwinian view too, but I prefer my view, which I explained in "Life Infinite", without a iota of expensive knowledge about it, and the cool thing is that there is a system to memorize the true story...But whatever the view, what you must understand is that I like to attack PMBBD, and final truths. I like straight principles and if I need Santa-Claus to exist for it, he'll be there for his part, but I'll never try to manipulate people in believing he exists final truth. That applies to my view of the mind, life and gods, in fact, the main reason I'm making an effort to include gods with life is because people have gone totally hospice ready in their collective schizophrenic-psychopath-megalomaniac combo of death believing their religious god did everything ("skid" for red devils, "psycho" for the death toll, and "megalo" for indoctrination of the whole humanity to it. Something like that but actually far worse).

The fact remains that Neanderthal disappeared, and even if some would like to think we were peaceful artist doing pottery and that they flew away in the wind, the truth was probably the contrary, as American Indians, which were not that far as ancestry and differences, almost all died from conquerors wanting to take all space and all food for themselves, and they were probably lucky to survive for the sole reason that we could reproduce with them. So the truth is that we probably stole everything they created then wiped their history neat of skeletons, we made ourselves gods in unfairness and violence.

And what is this scientific methodology where one gang say we didn't reproduce with the Neanderthals, while another gang says they have proofs that in fact it was a wonderful love story and that reproduction worked because they found a bit of the same DNA in both and thus they say it means our relation gave birth to the current form of humans which is the same that's always been while the Neanderthal disappeared by magic? Let me put things straight; DNA bits can come from anything, blood exchange, a mosquito, a virus, reproduction too but it absolutely doesn't prove scientifically that reproduction worked and that they gave birth to the current human.

And it changes nothing that I'm like you, it's their spirit I carry and defend, because after selecting them out, it means to me that we will do the same thing with any life not taking its place in our order of things, even aliens, they'll be competed to human assimilation and conformity or they'll be made evil for their different ways. And this racism and competition attitude is systemized worldwide and evident, whatever you continually sing big PMBBD love at all sauces, so you can bet that good aliens won't even think about it, or maybe they will, just to shock us in suicidal truth because our history would be accelerating toward them as they are approaching. I wouldn't doubt that a species standing for good would be disgusted of watching our history with their more advanced technology, they will know a lot of our true history without a lie in it, they will know us better than ourselves, and they will not admire and throw their money to all those "powerful" people who continually manipulate and hide things from the population that supposedly can't take the truth, you understand that? More truth equals better judgment equals more appropriate reactions, even if they are emotive, and the result is the developing of a better reality.

I guess they would be better sending a billion years more advanced spy satellite to do that though, to know if we are worth a visit, or if we're just an ant civilization they can crush to take the planet... And if they already visited earth to help life, then you can bet they'll know everything one way or the other, all these valid differences that disappeared, what happened to them etc. I know that filling the universe with a single god race with servants is the goal of the ego-gods ideology, but the exact contrary is more like it, and more enjoyable too, all the diversity we have eliminated in our ego competition, we'll regret it in depression and devaluation. All the bullshit too, your Christ superstar? We'll know the truth someday, the resetting of time to 0.

And be careful of your description of benevolent gods, something we made evil by twisting it for ego people. So strap yourself in and wish very hard that you are alone and that no aliens or gods are coming. One thing's for sure don't think they'd come here justifying for leaving us our independence if we made them evil 2000 years ago, the same for aliens, they would send a bomb device of some kind in an intercept course with the earth, no need to make a freak show voyage.

So, concerning the skeleton that always proves everything, you suppose we didn't burn our "enemies" to send them in hell instead of "respectfully" burying them to send them in heaven, and you suppose nobody simply had the contrary philosophy, like burning their dead to release their spirit instead of making a collection of them, and it may easily have lead into a spiritual clash, two views believing themselves as the final truth and wanting all space for themselves and convince everybody to get grants or keep their job, or provide results...Well, maybe not the last part, but that sounds like what scientist of the skeleton are presently trying to do.

There is often a single deciding person behind theories and research, and evidently; proofs. All kind of bias can cumulate in the data forming theories in a heavy competitive environment where cheaters can win and where everybody battle over the money. So whatever they say there existed only one black Adam and eve that got birthed by a chimpanzee (only once), that there was nothing else and it is proven like a miracle, I say associate their name to their affirmation and place it in the final truth category where they want it, but keep strong doubts because someday you'll know, and those people who spread such possibilities as final truths will get their name on the palmares of the greatest liars of humanity, even be the cause of massive wrong developments from their final truth learned at school and stuffed in computers final truth indoctrination; people like this created Christianity and all kind of wrong visions of things that caused massive sufferings.

Stuff a computer with the final truth and then other expertise will use the computer like a god saying the truth, and base their new theories from it. You're better acquiescing that you're theorizing or developing possibilities than inventing a wrong final view out of incomplete or conflicting proven scientific facts based on manipulated skeletons you try to glorify. We should stop trying to impose a view, we should know that by now with all the proven failed proven true discoveries of science, or we'll eventually have to start erasing valuable skeletons and history off the earth to prevent incompetent or evil people spreading PMBBD in ideological competition for manipulation.

Put the skeleton in a museum if it is worth it, make suggestions, expose possibilities from related findings, and that's it, don't enforce your personal stuff with it, keep the mind of people open or your skeletons get dusted. And don't think there is nobody that ran about in very old Neanderthal times retracing humanity's skeleton and dusting those, including theirs to stop a wrong spirituality you work so hard to win back. And don't judge intelligence from cranium form or your big IQ standards, and particularly after death stuff, what you do with the dead is not what determine the value of your intelligence, get that stupid belief out of your mind.

I tell you to be very careful of the reality you live in before believing you got all rights, if you live in a reality that is too full of PMBBD for sanity, and you made your skeletons a tool or a lead of PMBBD, you risk exactly what I'm talking about, you may have proudly made the job some wanted of you by running about and happily collecting all those skeletons, then manipulating people to a final vision with them. You like to play around death and graves? Be very careful your truly extraordinary findings don't end-up in the chipper, but don't worry, humanity will survive, with a pain, but not your incompetence at truly respecting the dead. And what will your kind say in the future when they'll find the first skeleton dated at -4000 years? You got to design a final truth you know! You found Adam! God?

And respect doesn't mean an effort at bowing the head, walking slowly or caressing skeletons and spilling crocodile tears (I'd bet those would be very valuable and significative tears), it means learning from ancestry to do better, not to admire and perpetuate their wrongs. I don't care you kick my bones to dust, what I definitively don't want is that you invent PMBBD from my cadaver, or spill the ego gods ideology all over my body.

Never let a priest say a parole for me, never say burying skeletons in the name of god is what permitted us to become human or develop intelligence, I'll answer it's the start of the failing of both things... Never invent yourself a monopoly of intelligence or human understanding, never underestimate or discard hate as evil, never underestimate the power of manipulation, and don't forget intelligence includes your arm that contributes to it, or my fist crashing unto your face, yes, that's intelligence, and my testosterone too is critical to it, without it you'll stagnate and die in as a selective failure.

And why don't you care more about the living anyway? You're trying to copy the Egyptians? There are a million suicide every year, there is a billion people living their whole life near death, are you waiting their death to study their skeletons? Can you do something to help them? There are thousands of people that have lost someone to oblivion, and that's just those who want to find a lost someone, why don't you start searching for all those people that "disappeared"? Where are they? Lost in streets? And why did they disappear? Then you'll go kaput when you find a skeleton without a name. Maybe your skeleton is one of those that have no name because people, or your reality failed at being interested in them while they lived...How can people come to that extent? Wishing to disappear or escape reality at a risk to their life (whatever the means) since they can't take it anymore, or your version of the best system makes them depressive. How can you come to that extent of pressure selection? Why don't you care for people fairly? Are you waiting to find a skeleton in the forest before turning the world over for me? Is that what you want? Anonymous skeletons laying everywhere? There are people who really wanted me dead, and I'm not sure how long it would take before getting noticed, 2 years? Then what, a disappearance? And who would complain about it?

And they absolutely need to become skeletons to attract your attention at it, I knew someone that worked around the poorer people, none had someone interested in them while they were living, neither once dead, dumped in a hole like garbage because they had a name and it was cold or drugs that killed them, normal, even good since those inferiors selected out don't count on the best health care system of the world statistics, but if they are found as a skeleton without a name, Wow! Big investigation! Big care! Why don't you take a tool to brush some dust off a living cranium instead of a dead one?

Me? Even if I'm a socially assisted that would feel at its wrong place, I'd prefer to spend some money to pay someone a burger instead of spending it reading his tooth, maybe I'd feel uncomfortable by the difference of standard of living, but I can listen to some babbling about a life different than mine, even if it doesn't interest me personally. I'm a life intelligence, my intelligence can listen, and I prefer that than listening to a study that always end up proving the skeleton is from someone that died tragically from this reality's ways. I'm ready to bet there are people that spoke less in their whole life than the babbling going around an anonymous skeleton, which have a tendency to suddenly lose much value once a name for it have been found.

I can pass a whole year without talking to a single person because I'm revolted by all the disgusting things of this reality, and instead of creating the situation for me to like living better, to appreciate empathy, you'll wait until I die to be interested in my story! I'll give you this book to tell my story while living and you won't read it, some will even want to put me to the death for it, or a mental institute which is worse than death to me, only then you'll be interested about what the socially assisted had to say? Yeah, you'll even pay a profiteer for it...

You "love" death? You'll probably get a big dose soon, where you'll reap so much violence and bloody death you'll be traumatized to eternity, and you'll have so many skeletons to study you'll never want to waste a bit of land for one ever again, and you'll care so much for life after that you'll never let someone disappear. Maybe not, there is still some time before things go irreversibly wrong, then we'll spend the rest of our existence using what's left of our mind potential grabbing at our hairs and fighting between ourselves in PMBBD complexity...

I may be going overboard, skeleton science is good and very important, but I still think that they too are going a bit overboard... Personally, the only skeletons that inspired me were 2 skeletons facing each other in death I saw somewhere, I almost felt love there.

For now, whatever I'm the same as most people, I'll be against this reality for as long as the ego competition continues, dividing countries, doing G7 meetings, and eventually making inferiors of everybody not encouraging the system with maximal efficiency (like the stupid competition of what province works the hardest in Canada, and guess what? Quebeckers (French vs English) are the laziest ones, we work 0.02% less than English Canadians and that's enough to hear about it all year round, racist Canadians use it to point a finger at us, businesses use it to put pressure, if our economy is bad it is because we don't work as hard as them, nothing to do with all their manipulations... Sure that you don't want too many counterproductive people like me, I'm not even a source of entertainment! It's just that I never liked your system, it's probably a gene thing, because many Quebeckers think like me even if they are not able to express it or understand it, they smoke, drink, and take drug instead of contributing to your wonderful system. Maybe that applies to people everywhere on earth, but something must be quite efficient at minimizing, twisting, or hiding it, or diverting into something else the unconscious feeling of being cheated, or revolting against wrongs, because the thing with me is that religions pissed me off right from the start, punishing me cumulated a revenge bubble, and it was all a matter of fairness.

I know I'm sometimes wrong in what I say, but everything makes sense in my head, everything is justified, under all the logical aspects I could deduct, so what am I to do? Go to the psy? I wonder what kind of amalgam of medication I would have to take to change my mind, or what's wrong with my philosophy, or spirituality...But yeah, you can tell me I'm the evil one, no problem, I can take some, you can use any qualification to describe me, twist your whole language to make me the enemy, normal, enemies are supposed to seek each other's destruction, nothing new under the sun, and I can't lose since I already lost before I was born; what can I do? What can I say? I told you I was wasting my time trying to make sense out of this hell, and no amount of argument will ever be enough for its members to stand for something better, only god. Giving a serious try to a truly different way is the last thing they will try, so last it will be after too late!

So go ahead, defend your shitty attitude with bullshit, you wanted the whole earth to your ego competition standard? You have it, have fun living superficially, since you can almost throw your history in the toilet so much it's falsified. Call me back when you'll have cleaned your bullshit, which is not born to happen soon when you still glorify religions like Christianity that invalidated and hid so much history the time counter had to be reset to 0. Or maybe you're better keep it all as it is and permit a new reality to be born, with its own counter starting at 0, but instead of being the birth of hell on earth, it will be the birth of paradise earth, so you can bet fairness and truth will define its form.

I'll drop the guns when people will act good and fair, and don't you ever tell me you can't do it, you always could, and you've got every arguments in this book for it, read over if you want to discover why you didn't; forcing people to "starve" (whatever the form) because you're an ego unfair pig that babble pretty, then killing or tagging them as evil because they "stole" an apple is exactly the reason. What would you do if you caught me infiltrating Celine's Las Vegas castle (bunker) to get at her money because I'm living poorly while she's rich and my logic of good and evil is that I should take from the most unfair people in your competition over the means? You'd kill me right there automatically, sure in your judgment, without a hint of a doubt that I'm doing evil worth death, while in my mind I'd have chosen to take some means off a vastly unfair person. But you wouldn't even look at the unfair difference, you'd defend massive unfairness without a doubt, for you it is logical that one is rich senseless while the other is poor senseless, you'd think I'm the criminal that is stealing, since systemized unfairness is not mass stealing in your mind, then you'd come to my rat's hole and dump my old stuff in a box for the garbage, this book with it, you'd never know I worked maybe harder than Celine to create it, that I was forced to steal unless I ended-up in the streets since I profited too much from the system I'm condemned to in your twisted view of what is profiting and fairness, surely not something Celine is doing. Celine is a glorified saintly white god from the stars, a sacred superstarrr spectacularrr!

I don't say that to do the such a pity, or because I'm jealous of her stash; I take from where evil is, and I'm at war against ego people, a war I can't lose because I already lost, a war you can't win because you've already won, all I can do is hold my side until I die, all you can do is the same. And I won't switch side, I'll write this and fuck you, I did far more than my fair part, I'm not a fucking brain that should remain in the same place until I die, I have a body, I want to do something with it someday, but if you want to kill me because you can't use me after this, go ahead, but with your attitude I'd be better dying out of cancer, that way you wouldn't say I'm a lazy profiteer... And what will be left of my life anyway? What do you want to squeeze more out of it? Do you think I can stop this revolt inside me? You'll never stop it; you'll worsen it! I can't even stop it myself; I want to run away, I want to hide, where? You took the whole earth, is there a place where my mind will be free? Death I guess, a long soothing sleep of innocent work, where I can let myself be taken without fear, where the forms around me are "smiling" and "understanding", carried to my right place like a dream, hoping my enemies are falling in an infinite pit to never wake up, having an infinity of time to think while living absolute terror. But I seem to still like it better to stay alive, and I wouldn't dare living without feeling I'm doing something worthy, useful to life.

And don't tell me I'm profiting from the system when you (democrats, capitalists, liberalists, socialists, ego people and their selection) condemned me to your system, took the forest for yourself, you took everything in existence and you profit from it, not me, I survive in your hell, and I do far better than surviving, I try repairing your fucking mess of profits! I'll slap the earth off your possessing hands, and the same for life and humanity, it is the end of your atlas god stealing the earth away (just add a bandit mask), you'll learn that nobody takes anything living (like money) to dump it on its stash of possessions, and nobody condemn others to a fraction of their potential for profits. I'll make you regret your ego psychopath megalomaniac philosophy, and you can take a million cute forms like Celine, and you can protect or hide behind saintly names like popes, cry your crocodile tears, I'll grab you by the hairs, drop you on your saint's knees, and you'll read my book asking for pardon for every word you used to manipulate.

I don't even need to talk good and evil, you are failing at your own most basic philosophy; survival! But yeah, when humanity have lost its potential to spread beyond earth, it is not the time to prove good and evil exist or not, you have proven you are evil, it is the end, can there be greater failure to stand for good than that? Answer! What are you waiting for to do something? Inexistence? You need to prove you failed? You have all the arguments, all the tools, and you'll end-up saying you were innocent, and thou shalt not throw the first rock? No sir, you won't get me with your bullshit, whatever the size of it.

And don't say I'm an extremist, you are! Indoctrinated at the extreme of sacrificing everything in your suicidal megalomania! I make every effort to put water in my wine, I try to provide everybody with an exit door, when you'll reach your end you'll have reached the final extreme of evil by destroying in the egg any potential for a better way with your fair competition... But I understand the fear, since extremism and radicalism may destroy the whole world to rubble if you went to the radical extreme of taking it whole, particularly when you use liberty to qualify your extreme, radically final condemnations.

And with the amount of PMBBD people are stuffed with, then you can be sure their judgment is sufficiently handicapped that when they'll revolt they'll do it too late and not with something really better in mind. It's not necessarily a better view that will change things, anything fitting the ego gods ideology will grow the hell, any bullshit can arise to try itself at controlling the world. Furthermore, I wouldn't underestimate the pressure from life systems in that, so revolt may just come naturally from any spark, probably an ego lack of satisfaction one, the system just prevented it in whatever way until now, but it will keep on coming back, forever more unconsciously driven, forever more explosive, forever more dangerous, without making things better, just because life systems deduct humanity's repressed feelings. So whatever they'll be bloody evil killers and rapists and you're a selection of peaceful believer full of twisted principles, life wants neither of you; you're both useless to stand for what life wants and there are too many of you.

Maybe it's your best system you're invading the world with life doesn't want, because of too much misery and suffering, because you made a mess out of the mind! Don't forget life is the result of truth; is your system truly the best and only one in the universe? Is your view of god the final truth? As long as you make final truth with possibilities, and go to the extreme of trying to implant it in everybody, then you'll reap more problems unless you reach the extreme end of humanity, since the only thing that can survive is truth and good. So for extremists and radicalists, maybe you should remove the beam in both your eyes before tagging all little gangs of protesters that are not peacefully at home as extremists or radicals, particularly with your police army that don't even want to see a protester anymore, they are the most radical and extreme ones, you're actually becoming worse than a dictatorship, talking of beams in one's eyes.

Many people who invest themselves in this reality become jealous and frustrated and that leads them to exaggerate their desires, and act very ego, a lot out of fear; it is easy to quickly end-up dreaming of becoming rich or bossing around or winning at lotto when you've had it hard or seek to become a success story in this reality. Listen to what they'd do if they had the means, listen to how ego related their wishes are, with a good cause for a good measure... When will there be someone like me to win at lotto? Yes I do take tickets, but if I do win I will use the money to exactly try to prove they are wrong with their autosuggestion pub saying that winning at lottery doesn't change the world, except...Well, I'm the exception here that would put that money to really try changing the world, scary the fate of the world is a matter of lottery, but don't worry, I won't win, god wants your involvement, why should I do everything myself without proof that you're ready to sacrifice a little for it? Maybe you're not worth it too...Why is someone like me, who got the capability to really do something, is stuck in the worst possible situation where the only way to reach my goals would be to become a traitor to myself? I must I rely on lottery? Why every cause will get a rich philanthropist to spend on it but not my cause while it is THE cause? You think I wouldn't pay a few experts? You think I wouldn't invest in publicity? And that's far from all what I can do with the means, give me billions and you can bet I'll use them in a very productive toward good fashion, nothing will go to personal luxury, I know exactly how I would use them, tons of people would get paid, simulations would be functional after a few years, means would be flowing to publicize every facet of the work, a foundation would be made to associate most countries on the project, I would only be limited by the means at my disposition. But maybe democracy capitalist government would declare war like I'm doing communism, if I show hints of getting successful, or if I don't let things under the control of politicians, no politicians in my reality, really, their job is too hard anyway... Who got the means? Rich people. Masses could do the job, but they're hard to wake-up, harder to steer away from glitter when their vision full of bullshit. All is left is for me to become a capitalistic businessman or a politician manipulator, and winning at lottery! Wow!

People have abandoned, they don't question the system seriously no more, or what is truly good and evil, they think it is "normal" that many people work their life out to end up with nothing, they think what they work for is the only way for humanity, while rich financials never tire of inventing more twisted ways to exploit human resources. Everyday in the news is the same paranoia about the economy, to satisfy investors who want to see money growing in trees, the good old perpetual fear of an economic crisis is never far... You like to dwell in economic PMBBD? You gave everything to this reality? What can I say, die with it! You just had to act humanly. Defend what compose a good human, defend your humanity or be treated inhumanly, and die with evil if you encourage it and work all your life for it, if you're married to it, why not?

All these economic problems, I'm ready to bet some are squarely created on purpose by knowledgeable manipulators. I say when things are relatively stable you're not supposed to end-up in economic troubles, unless you're very incompetent running the democracy-capitalism business, or more like incompetent at transferring your unfairness to people not born... So yes there will eventually be cataclysmic troubles, since we have this utopist and ridiculous attitude like earth resources can only either stay stable or increase; but the selection accept, tolerate, adapt, believe in their superior, and someday there will be far less resources instead of more.

But don't worry too much for the economy for now, people have been exploited and manipulated so much that those with the means can run things from their stash for a lot of time, if it comes to that, which is unlikely, and the economy will never crash to famine alone, it will need a coincidence of factors which will definitively happen in the future, but first, the selection must die massively to reconsider their ideal seriously. And I know that you don't need resources to have an economy, all kind of things contribute to an economy, there will always be one, but when we'll be condemned to never dream past earth, when we'll live from recycling rubbles, you can bet the economy will be far smaller, and don't think you'll be richer for it, particularly if you got to keep all the luxury clean, and all those rich and their families got to keep their standard of living...

It's always been our choice to make a fair economy or an unfair one, and this choice dictates humanity's form as well as the limitations to our future, including all good spiritual concepts all the way to how the universal intelligence, or gods, or extraterrestrials could see us, or not at all. There are people who have been complaining from the beginning about unfairness, good people ready to work hard and sacrifice a lot to stop injustices, but it is worsening, while the song that things will get better continues. The truth is that misery won't end, life's suffering won't end, unfairness won't end, it's all interdependent with overpopulation and inadequate leadership, and people made it eternal by their blind "love" for superiority. And I know people work hard, I do too, but I know many people that died far earlier than the rich out of working incredibly harder; we don't say good people leave too early for nothing, even if that can be used by evil at their funerals. The adapted selection sweated, sacrificed love, spilled blood and violence profusely to encourage this reality to be the only way, and now they have it, hell, I hope you'll enjoy what you spent so much resources and energy for...

The problem is with those who don't have a sane definition of good and evil, who just follow laws and try to profit as much as possible. What's worse, most of them don't even know it and will refuse to acknowledge it, denial automatic, no time to waste on different opinions, no arguments, they just dream too big and their unconscious pushes them to a path by the weight of history or PMBBD. You have to wonder if there is not a genetic sickness like fat, a kind of mutation associated with some profitability spheres.

You could have spent on something else than your enclave family or gang that's already full, your friend's businesses, new stores that would bring you more money, yachts and personal jets, donations to improve your image, luxury voyages and prostitution, oh! Sorry, "love". Why did you never gave (not invest it) it to imagination, to dreams, to future without looking in the mirror? Help the planting of a forest and pay well the ones who plant trees whatever they do with the money; their ego is under a lot more need and frustration than yours, slow down your profit machine, pay your employee to work for life or good goals, help a recycling center, the growth of better food, families, small businesses, whatever, there are a thousand ways you could spread your money to people probably a lots more worthy than you and your gang (can be investors). But it's not how the system works, it's not the road to success (strange how successful people are always seen as rich or popular (manipulators)...

I'm generalizing because if the people who took the means generally had good intentions, then this reality would be a lot better, but it's not happening because in a crushing vast majority of cases, the rich do nothing good with the life energy of "their" people besides all the injustice and wrongs they cause. No they don't do it, or this reality is far worse than I thought. But yeah, when they're tired of stashing luxuries in their bunkers, they go make a game of living in poverty a few months to prove themselves like those who need a cataclysm and a camera to cry. Anyway, ego gods "love" to watch poor or suffering people, it makes them feel lucky or superior, so they wouldn't stand a reality without inferiors, and they need to keep an eye on them while fabricating themselves an image so they can keep on reaping money from those open mouthed inferiors. So you can bet they give away some of "their" money for a good measure of philanthropy! Innocents crying in admiration of their ego gods distributing deductible checks while the innocent get half of the check taken by the government and taxes...what a joke eh! Welcome to sarcasm, narcissism and irony live, but I got to be careful not to get tainted by looking too much at this dark pit, psy could hybridize sarcasm, irony and narcissism to have a new, supremely powerful word to spread in the selection, and you can bet it's me that will end-up receiving it...

As for the poor souls who wish so much to work on the pyramids, when you'll stop crying in front of your ego gods and spitting your "love" for them in every sentences, oh god! Oh god! then maybe there will be some possibilities for mentalities to change (overtaking your implanted crap with your better consciousness). Just count how many time you hear "oh my god!" in a week (a week is the measure for a learning step at school and it is the measure for the start of a minimally effective séance of PMBBD. A television programming is done with that measure in mind, and the same for religious or sect's and work indoctrination. I say "the start" because that's very variable in effectiveness from one thing to the other, the number of repetition and time, and the vulnerability of the person to it specifically.)

The "Oh my god!" thing is quite an ego expression, you are so profoundly manipulated and brainwashed without questioning things that you say that expression totally unconscious of the meaning of it. It means all of you want to have your personal god doing your biddings, you say "my god". God is your pet so much you unconsciously want to be superior to anything in existence in your ideology, so maybe yes your leaders are a reflection of your mind, we're just lucky you're not the one that invented religions to manipulate people until they say brain-dead things like "Oh my god!", as a manipulation for the living part of your brain... You unconsciously believe in absolute ego, the most "evil" way of thinking and you are perfect for your system, go win a billion at lotto now, so we can hear you screaming "Oh my god!!!!"... To find god so deeply and universally implanted in language is an irrefutable proof of how we are under PMBBD influences deeply in languages all the way to the bed, just watch porn and listen to the woman crying "oh god! Oh god! (Isn't it strange how many Christ crosses there are in porn? Or how many try to play the virgin? And they all got a gang's tattoo on their ass! So ridiculous, but maybe I notice too much, or watch too much religious porn? Probably not, involving god and Jesus in sex is too perverse for me...) But don't worry, it is not totally your fault, it is just the history of humanity to date and maybe in another thousand years scientists will find god in our DNA, and we will see some babies that instead of crying upon birth will say "Oh my god!" Now, what do we make of all those expressions we stamp with god, the same way we can stamp anything with love? When you say something is divine, it's hard to replace such a powerful adjective...

And being poor doesn't automatically make you pardonable, or good, or someone to pity, who is destined to be poor beggars anyways? There are people that are struck by bad luck or injustice, they can have my compassion and help, but half are crappy characters that failed at being evil, if that works... If the ones that gave me unneeded difficulties in life end up fat or ugly or stupid or drug dead, I'm supposed to do the work they never did? They acted like they were better than me, then show it! And what came out of all your heavy socialization? Worse than nothing? I'm supposed to help them if I can, make things better for them too, and at the first opportunity, they'll crush again people like me because they're jealous? They want people no better than themselves so they dump all responsibility on the same person for a guaranteed failure? Why didn't I grow fat or dumb like you to get rid of my responsibility to make things better? It's on my shoulders and I'm the evil one?

Yes I must be compassionate for the lower of the pyramid but I won't be for most, you are no better than the rich, only less intelligent or more lazy, you have the same ideal and ways of thinking, go ahead, dream of winning at lotto for your facelift, for sex, to have a servant cleaning your shit, you are into injustice profoundly in a lot of your little attitudes, you proved historically to accept and tolerate unfairness because that's you, you have a history of injustice with me, even if you pass your time bitching between yourselves while you don't even take the minimal responsibility of caring for yourselves, you shout like everything is crap but you have nothing to show for your big consciousness, so we can see if you're really good or just an incompetent manipulator. If most of the actions you do are petty crimes to survive the end of months or to get a bonus over your small pay, then you are an obstacle I'm tired of jumping over. I refuse to be compassionate of people acting worse than animals and emptying their frustration on people less strong than themselves, even their own children.

Poverty or innocence is not supposed to be a justification to act badly, like it's an answer to any sin, this reality systemized innocence in people by not teaching them straight truths, principles and the best way and order of thing as a basis in youth, in fact, it profits from innocence and its message is "profit from your innocence for doing stupid while you can", like it want people to stay innocents as the path for happiness and to pardon wrongs.

Who was it again that said to pardon innocents because they don't know what the fuck they're doing? And the same for many such senseless PMBBD stupidities, like the thing about the one that never did a wrong has the right to throw the first rock. It is my value in the balance of good and evil that counts, and my responsibility is to affect the other side by weighting more on mine or by removing some on the other side, and if popes are soldered on the evil side, I'll scrape them off in blood, or torch them to carbon, crush them with a hammer, or blast them to pieces, increasing my good value, but there are so many I'll pass my life over and again to clear them off that plate. I'll throw rocks and worst to anybody that keeps that balance on the evil side. And that includes all religions and sects twisting life spirituality and principles. Trying to condemn people to submission by saying that throwing rocks to evil is evil while they're off to make a saint war...

It is very easy to learn what attitudes are good or bad, do you see children running everywhere nude because they are innocent? Why do they all wear clothes if they can't control themselves using physical and mental violence and acting superior to other by crushing the smaller or less strong? Eh! Where do they take their examples? Ah here come the scientist with its animal complex, we are animals with a big brain and controlled by hormones and chemicals, so we can do nothing about it. We are not animals, are we born with clothes on? NO! We learn almost everything, even shitting! Our animal part is 1% besides our human implementation from learning skill, we become what we decide to be, we become a reflection of what we encourage consciously and unconsciously through history!

I passed my youth tolerating and pardoning in peace cultivated superior innocents and when I reached adulthood, it was exactly the same thing at a different level. Innocence in this reality is a mean to reach its ends of forming pyramids of superiors and inferiors, it's a placement strategy. PMBBD disinformation is one way, religions indoctrination is another, overload of entertainment, heavy socialization, psy, publicity, religions and many other are all exploited as means to keep people innocents of fundamental truths, keep you occupied at something else than introspection and thinking too much globally since you'd make a depression or revolt if you had enough truth to form adequate judgment.

This reality doesn't want you to think profoundly and question fundamental things, particularly the ego competition mentality. So it made an invincible pyramidal reality where not even the top know anymore since they are grown in the reality too, adding to it, advancing the forgotten old plan, they follow the way of things.

The only one that still have a little chance at knowing what is the reason behind the enforcement of this reality is the main one dealing with god, the sexist catholic church, the Vatican, that's the one that may know the truth since it ran all over the place cumulating and manipulating history; they're overloaded in historical manipulations, you'd need more than a lifetime going through all their secret stuff, and they're reaching old beyond almost all governments. You think old governments ran about the earth on foot? No way, some rare ones took a walk in youth, with armies, family dynasty oblige, but the powerful needed young very motivated people to run for them, and for that you needed the greatest inspiration that carried your basic philosophy of the rich and powerful, to eternity, saintly war to any competitor, and run fast to be the first on the cake of super PMBBD hype.

But who on earth would attack such a bunch of slow motion saintly crazies ready to indoctrinate the whole earth? Nobody, but no need to, you have a good idea of it by reading me; ego peoples is the reason, even if I don't know the precise historical details, resetting time to 0 is an efficient wall to hide the truth... Besides, they may not know themselves, the fundamental reasons have been forgotten, like a father that built something and, before dying, gave it to his children; the children knows how it works, but he doesn't know how to build it. We did that with the human civilization; ancestors built it evil and gave it to their children with "love", and a hypocrite smile...

And don't think there was no evil plans in old times, it is exactly the contrary, time was not the same as today, we have all kind of interesting options to spend our time on presently, but in old Egyptian times, people passed their whole life concentrated on one thing; carrying and fitting one brick. That's how all those pyramids were built, not by magic, every brick is the life energy of a person. The same for making manipulation plans, they were deep and complex because the intelligence and imagination of tons of people who had nothing else to do was invested in them, and it was a matter of options versus population, ego leadership satisfaction, so yes we can do far better today, but maybe not on the religious aspect, because that aspect was available at the time and billions of people went nuts over it because it was the best story for a thousand years, the best movie, something of a scale never seen in human history, with something for everybody.

The bosses behind religious institution in old times were not popes or saints, they were the most evil manipulators you could find, and they enforced the ego-gods ideology as the only way for many purely evil reasons, not only because they slept with the powerful of the time. With time they continued their manipulations and dumped or forgot the original reason which may in part have been to divert energy away from "civil war" against the rich and powerful, to more work power and external war campaigns, apart running everywhere exploring, indoctrinating tribes and convincing other "powerful" with how wonderfully it worked to submit the population lower (more pressure selection), powerful all making themselves a twisted version of their story (history).

However, forcing lies as truth, even if you think the false image you project of your exemplary leadership to millions of people has no bad effect, just making you superior and your position harder to access, you are wrong, it will always cause problems, to the point that all life may get destroyed if our history is a joke of manipulations. I even believe the truth of PMBBD is revealed by time since time advancing is history, and truth bow to logical laws, whatever some of these are deducted and made from life, and I'm not even talking spiritual universe possibilities here.

We could invade the Vatican, nothing wrong with that, but it's a fortress, even a country, with an army, heavy guns and tactical missiles, the pope is armed to the teeth like a crazy maniac, the slow motion saint thing? Manipulation! He got the war machine of many countries in his pockets by its strong presence in these places, so watch out. But it's full of secrets and treasures, just don't burn things, never burn things, unless it is to dislodge evil. And don't forget the best stuff that could be found, truth, may be protected in or behind very marvelously beautiful pieces of historical art, and they may move it elsewhere if they fear an attack, they may have vast tunnels to condemn in case something happens, so don't think you'll ever find some truth, you may, if you're lucky.

Sorry, that's just me going crazy a little, think about it, you could kill a pope in there! Wow! An untouchable thing that distributes love! Did someone ever catch one? I'm sure not, he's untouchable! Invincible! A god! Worthless at it, since there is a never ending line of replacement would be popes, like there is a never ending file of would be presidents...And what would I do with that bunch of mass liar, criminals, and desecrators of everything good anyways? I could imprison them for life 20 by cells, bypassing the funky justice system that would defend them. No, beheading, less expensive, and it would fit since they're a medieval thing, but I'd feel too barbarous. Lapidating then, there are some religions that still do it to women who refuses to be the possession of "their" "loving" men, I'll bring them there. No, we attach on their backs a cross with a Christ on it, these are laying everywhere, we chain them all for a long procession while whipping at them, and then we crucify them on the back of their cross. That's worse than anything and crosses were never meant to crucify people. You think I'm insane? I did nothing of these things, never! Who did these things? Who do you defend? Answer! What is the truth? Eh? Don't point at me while their history is a show of horror and manipulation in actual facts, don't point at me while you defend it!

I'm pissed off all of a sudden, I don't know what's my thing with this religion but it always makes me super emotive, it's just a pacification tool and a shield for the rich (the ego gods ideology) after all, and I shouldn't go emotive about tools, or maybe I should if I'm to ever see the machine explode...Anyway, people are all totally sold to the devil, a grand success story, they'd feel bad about it, and good people don't like these kind of things, so we must bring them to "justice" and judge them for the greatest crime in existence; the systematization of hell! But forget about all this, they're all innocents who will defend their institution to death, we must tolerate and pardon, eternally, dust to dust. They spread the ideology as a sickness, and everybody is having it and defends it. Present leaders are just a result anyway, they are probably truly innocents, and the ego gods ideology is the goal, and now that humanity is condemned to it all the way to the unconscious of people, they can retire their pressure and just remain there as a back-up institution incapacitated or hopeless people can always fall back to.

Religions can't do otherwise that destroying things, lives, minds, souls, because they defend the ego gods ideology. All religions are the same on that aspect, and it's a wonder they don't all meet and fuck each other in the ass in secret. You won't even be able to develop a good ideology without stumbling on them and their throng of PMBBD indoctrinated followers sold to the devil awaiting the antichrist, even those who are not will defend them, just in the name of being a part of the gang. They are ready to destroy all humanity and the planet in the name of their ego god, and yes they can, don't even think of attacking them, more than half the planet is religious one way or the other, and governments defend them, they are often associates, when they are not the developers, even if they want you to think otherwise. Some still believe in their god to this day because the story have been perfected for so long that the original intents are forgotten and everybody is a saint, and those that don't, do it for image so much it is important for controlling people around.

So if you attack religions it will naturally slip in WW3 since the way of religions is dust to dust, entropy, massive death, sufferings and destruction, they are ready to destroy the whole planet to have a representative of the ego gods ideology standing as a god! The end of the world? Pfff! A justification to gain more adepts, proven in their scriptures. Since they won't disband, the only way to get rid of religions is to bet that you'll succeed at destroying them forever while surviving their absolute bloody massacre saintly war riposte, and end-up still having all good dreams possible and the means to rebuild humanity successfully from the rubbles left.

If we survive them so we can study them in a few thousand years of being free of their influence in a different reality, evolved people will all acquiesce that religions have been one of the greatest hurdle of humanity when looking through all its after effects, whatever many presently believe we'd be nowhere or retarded if they didn't exist. The truth is more like the contrary, we'd presently be in year 3000 if they hadn't existed. If they hadn't brought a placebo of hope to throng of people, they would have revolted against evil at repetition from better judgment and more strength of will, many more evil development civilizations would have failed for examples of what not to do, and people would have developed as more caring of life instead of giving everything to ego gods. Religions have permitted the ego-gods ideology to become invincible is my belief.

You better not attack them, I'm a give a chance kind of guy, and my work is their last chance, even if I shouldn't; who gives a chance in hell? So I'm just exploring possibilities, call it prevention, understanding thy enemy (don't twist that into "loving", it's just my extreme empathy that make me preventive, or my defense made of spikes). It's all a matter of manipulation prevention, so don't be fooled by their saint look, be really scared, the ugliest monsters are often hidden behind the prettiest façade, a few thick books made at great expenses and a history of slippery manipulative tongues and there you go. Don't forget the evil of lies is proportional to the number of people affected by them, but that's just my view of evil, sorry, you know why I consider PMBBD that much of a crime, incapacitating judgment of masses...They have handicapped life by the pressure selection they encouraged, they are the cause of a 2000 years retard of mind development in humanity, and they are still an obstacle to the better way of our existence, even survival. Convincing them they are wrong is like trying to convince a president that the democracy capitalism business is not the best way of humanity. There is no way to deal with them, they're twisted, blind, deaf, and senile and they got an old book or phrase for anything. You think my work will impress them? Pfff! They got a verse that says someone will write my kind of crap because it is predictable, and you can bet the guy is evil...

Maybe they can still heed sense if they are open to the truth of the reasons why they were created, but that is unavailable to Christianity, they didn't reset time to 0 for nothing, and don't worry, all what's written about history by powerful people of the time who made history and controlled writings is absolute truth to historians, nobody manipulated no shit, particularly when they're religious people studying the history of religions...

It's one hell of a story though, strange I didn't read it, I think I know far too much stuff without reading, something doesn't work, it's like socialization...Churches are pretty though, without the suffering and misery, but maybe the quantity is a bit exaggerated, particularly when considering all the branches that make an emphasis on this or that...Gothic paintings of struggle and misery, crucified Jesuses everywhere, angels, virgins and a hundred bibles, a versions for everybody, very cute, very touching, want a poem? Here's a bible, appose your hand on the bomb that will implode your mind into peaceful submission...

I'm happy we built some of these things, wrote some of these stories, but an overload of it everywhere as truth, even today, is a condemnation to go back to it, a form of eternal publicity; don't forget we're here if you lose hope, or need pardon... Next, I like history, I want it preserved, but the simple weight of history associated to wrongs can condemn many minds. Don't collect too much trash is what I say, you'll make a depression, so at some point you got to kick the trash out, and "trash" is very relative here...We'll have to demolish some Christ statues with a sledgehammer someday, yes we'll have to, such things are not sacred, or are they? I hate crucifixion, it is an insult to all principles that can be associated to life or love, they are evil.

And for people who see Christianity in their soup, did you ever ask yourself if evil spirituality existed? Where is it? What is its base? All of a sudden evil is out of spirituality? Damn, it's hard to find evil in hell, no references except commandments (laws)...Ah, they are sects where people get themselves suicided! But it's the same base. If only some paradise planet could pass by, I wouldn't feel so lost and alone in my things, I could just say "hey! look, here is a proof that another way is possible without religions, look at how beautiful, look at the happiness, look at life!". Half my headaches would disappear, ego reality would be forced to question itself seriously, and a revolution would form over mistaken attitudes for sure. But I'm too positive, probably we are so condemned to the ego-gods ideology, we'd easily find a justification to compete, to make them inferiors, to declare war, to destroy the paradise to make fantastic stashes of profits, to prove only the ego-gods ideology can exist (since the paradise didn't survive the competition), particularly if they refuse to have sex with us. But everything wouldn't depend on my ability to reap bad feelings, I wouldn't depress so much over all the irreversible troubles of this reality, all its systemized invincible eternal problems that make me believe it's far too late, worthless waste of time, no way after no way after no way equals rewind a lot.

Innocence, ignorance, incompetence, there are reasons for me to consider pardon, but that would be too easy for everybody. Ok, here's a deal; show your good intents by helping the birth of another worthy ideal, instead of competing and seeking its destruction. That's the only option for pardon I have left, I want a proof, and I can pardon the whole of humanity that way, in my life view, anybody that did wrongs, I can pardon people who are innocent of encouraging or defending evil, but I can't pardon people who don't even want to give a chance to something that has the potential to help the betterment of life and humanity with all the necessary arguments and principles to make it valid. If you understand what I write about you are in big troubles, you'll eventually have a choice to make, because it is now that we change attitude or die.

As for my pardon, what do you have against the concept? You think after all what I explained, all what I hate, how revolted I am, how I made the effort to express my revolt in writings instead of killing, that nobody owe me excuses? I'm forced to live in this hell and I should be sorry for myself if I don't pardon what revolts me? No, sorry for yourself, I already explained how I see pardon, you force me to live in a reality overwhelmed in wrongs, and you think your system is so good that humanity's pardon is granted in advance? Nostradamus style? When things will crumble you'll sing that it is not the time to point fingers? Only capitalism laws dictate the needs of pardon? You forgot what is the truth of pardon? Here it is; you have the right to ask pardon to, or pardon, anybody who ruins something you hold at heart, and you ask pardon to the responsible. I'm right to be revolted, I should have the right to destroy this hell, but I guess in hell it's a logical that good people should be sorry if they attack or insult evil...Still, I'll pardon if something is done to change things for the better, but I'll never pardon if humanity loses its potential, and I have that right because I stood all my life for what is good, and I reaped shit, and that is a logical too; the best people reap the worst in hell...

But I'm only a human being among billions, you can do without me, see me as your classic megalomaniac that is boasting himself a position to pardon humanity... I don't see people fighting much for what is important to me, or they do it with such incompetence that it feels like the contrary, but yeah, I do pardon good intents, it's free pardon, but it's hard to deduct good intents in a reality of manipulators...You could say my mentality is old stuff and it's logical that it should disappear, but I feel such a minority that I wonder if I'm not appearing instead, preparing myself a big coming out, a revelation of life, weird, that makes all goosepimply in my megalomaniacal humility... So what of it? Why would you care about my pardon? Yeah, forget it and I won't care about you too, I'll just take my hole and you'll never hear from me again, and I'll be happy to have stood up, tried my shot at the version of express yourself of this reality. And my attitude with pardon is not a god thing, it's a human thing that is judging the reality he lives in globally, I'm against the ideology that successfully covered the world, I never encouraged it, I carry a different ideal that I think worthy, it's not me that made this reality that revolted me all my life, so who is accountable for all these bad feelings? I took the challenge of understanding, and I'm still here, far stronger and entirely justified as an added bonus! While almost everybody encourages this reality I hate and defend it with all their strength, all innocents with good intents it seems! So if I want to pardon, I'll do it for humanity that is all an interdependent whole of innocents who can throw responsibility where they want, if they prove their good intents. If not then I developed the argumentation to weight good and evil for the only worthy war out of this I see, or for after death possibilities.

But you can forget about me, ignore me, no problem, or carry me in your heart and persevere in your path until it fails, I can live with that as I don't suffer from an attention deficit disorder in my loneliness, even if I'd like of a more appropriate life than poverty, but I'll make my point as big as I can, because I believe in humanity's potential. For me, people are not meant to live in a competition of profiting, I don't see superior and inferiors, I believe humanity can work well together with most differences, but the different possibilities of systematization have never been truly explored because of the ego-gods ideology that competed to destruction all other possibilities that didn't fit its ways.

You condemned me to this reality I hate and I shouldn't have the right to pardon? Ok, no pardon! And sorry if I decided to develop differently long ago, I'm not a profiteer, I'm not a fuck all free for all, I'm not a neutral, I don't encourage evil, I don't work for it, I don't desecrate love, I'm not a manipulator, I don't accept systemize unfairness, I don't profit as much as I can from life. I'm not an indispensable superior exception in a sea of inferior expendable morons who can be exploited because they are not as successful or rich as me, while forgetting that I'm the most inferior of all because I'm just an ego dog that jumped on the cake first and made it impossible for humanity to work in harmony by condemning them to a competition to become like me; a superior that can't even understand that my richness comes from systematized unfairness, evil.

This ideology invalidated the fundamental fairness drive needed to raise a good and lasting civilization, people have felt cheated right from the beginning, ego leadership have created a pressure selection of humanity to condemn it to interdependence so a few can have everything they want in exaggeration, be treated as gods while condemning humanity to stay on earth until it disappears, waiting for god to come. I don't think like that, I believe in humanity's potential, I believe we can travel the stars, I believe we can exist as long as we have the competence to, contrary to the continual bullshit from science that we'll disappear like every animal because of their limited vision, so who cares, we'll all die anyways...Well, you can die an insignificant in your ego god competition for all I care, but me and my friends from other planets, we have extraordinary things to live beyond your wildest dreams, in a time form where a thousand years is like a second...But that still doesn't prevent humanity from spreading in the universe, sorry for you if you made the process a depressing one instead of an enjoyable one, or if you condemned yourselves to stay stuck on earth until death from confounding evil with good...Did I mention somewhere that bullshit will be the cause of humanity's failure in the end? I believe we can take the means to live trillions of years, maybe even as longer than the universe itself, build ourselves the most extraordinary history, and I can't tolerate people who lower their arms on that, and I can't pardon people who are taking the means to devaluate humanity, and that's a human talking, not a god. But yeah, mass death and destruction, even extinction, is always an option, and if I'm so revolted it is in part because I fear it is coming; the present reality is the only one that can make the ego-gods ideology work at such an overpopulation scale, a scale too big to exist without the ideology currently on its high of manipulation, image, fake and bullshit...

What is evident to me is that a drastic turn of event must force those who took the means (yes I know they worked to get them, like any thief) to use them for the betterment of life, and not like investors, I mean really, like tetra trillions of dollars to pay people to make a better systematization. But history have proven that they'll never do it, usurpators of leadership there for the money, glory, or family dynasty, too superior, they know it all in their indoctrination and selected experts... Then there are masses who could wake-up and pressure them, but the selection is inappropriate, totally lack judgment, and waited for too late, they failed the most basic principles of good, fairness and truth, their best system was not the best after all, it was all PMBBD indoctrination, and subjugation under the unnecessary complexity of the economic system and the Democracy-Capitalism business. My other fear is that people have been selected for a genetic emphasis toward mentalities better serving an ego-gods ideology, so they may simply be incapacitated of revolting for anything else than immediate survival and their work conditions. In such a case only a planetary famine could change things, and we'd probably keep the same fundamental philosophy, since survival is proportional to means...If no serious effort is made by either leadership or their population right now, then the only solution I see is for life systems to massively destroy and cripple this reality back to the level it was 2000 years ago and never stop for as long as people don't fucking respect life (themselves among other things, always got to specify for people who see life superficially). But there are already many examples of that, and it's supposed to work automatic action reaction, unless gods put their nose into things...

I still have faith because I believe this reality is imprinted as a failure in a growing mass of young people, and it is unconscious, they don't even know it's a life thing, while medias people and experts make all kind of auto suggestive theories to direct unfairness revolt toward their political agenda, they'll say it's alcohol, testosterone, or a second generation immigration thing of frustration, or it's the Arab spring, or they're gang members, or they play violent games etc, but they'll never doubt the mess is a result of bullshit or systemized unfairness or the best and only system. What they don't know is that those people are far more intelligent than they seems, (for drugs, it is not necessarily bad for intelligence, but it may shorten the good of it), and them, experts, psy, and media people who think yourselves intelligent, are worsening things every time they babble their manipulative knowledge.

But I still fear it's too late, even to do the good rich, and I know how unfair people are, they got many options, so they'll use a bit of the means they took to throw a bag of candy to the inferior bums if prison are too full, but someday it won't work anymore. I'm telling you that the only solution is to give birth to a good reality, a planetary project that will inspire people to look ahead. That's the only peaceful exit door I see for all the rich, the politicians, the bankers and the "crats" of this world to keep their dignity and order.

But I still prefer to autosuggest myself that a growing mass of people will get fed-up with the incompetent bitching of rich or powerful people and their expensive actions that don't make things truly better, they're becoming a failure across the board and the hell you created by lying and systematizing unfairness is ready to be lighted. And in a sense; it is life that will be taking over to bring about the successful result of the creation of hell, flames, violence and destruction everywhere, and I wouldn't be surprised to see life systems unleash many of its powers at once, virus epidemics, earthquakes, volcanoes, typhoons while ego people, as always will be expending their police and war machine mercenaries on the people they can't control anymore. But they will be responsible for the whole mess from beginning to the end by taking all means and systemizing them for those they like the attitude of, by taking control of every facets of life for profiting, by mass lying, mass profiting, mass manipulating, mass incompetence, mass death, that's what they'll have achieved with the means they took.

I know I shouldn't write what I think, and I don't want to make autosuggestion, or worse, give direct orders, but maybe I should though, maybe it is important to incite to revolt in the present situation! But everything is relative, so I should say that I'm against out of control revolt, unless people are already in very big troubles. You are dependent from the system; don't forget that, what will you do when you'll be dying out of hunger because you revolted? A new reality starts with one person, then two, then tree, it's a birthing that grows in territory while doing everything differently, it's not a sudden switch where everything suddenly change poof and people are happy. Who will suffer true change? Who will give space? You? The country competition? Who will leave resources alone? Who will stop the pollution? Who will stop spreading mutations and chemicals all over the place? Who will give space to wild life? Who will stop PMBBD? So you better forget it, continue with the green revolution, you'll gain some time, but one day the reality we created may not permit our survival anymore, and I refuse to contribute to my worst fears, I stood for sense all along, I could have profited from life, I could have developed as an ego person, I could have become a rich artist making entertainment and running after trophies, but I didn't choose that path, and that's a human here, complete in its soul, and I tell my opinion which is a human one. And you can hide my work, refuse to publish it, desecrate it, burn it, you can control people's expressions all you want, use PMBBD at the ton, but that's your part, and it won't prevent life systems from striking, again, and again, until no more options are left, then we'll disappear.

Yet, if it is true that the ego-gods ideology is the only way, then the present reality may as well be the best path of humanity, whatever it leads to, whatever it must keep people as specialists pushed through PMBBD in attitudes that forces them to be innocents of fundamental wrongs to the point that 10 million people die every years (drugs, suicide, murders, war, famine, pollution, etc) from the pressure selection, whatever the next step is the death of billions, whatever wildlife is getting dead all over the place to mass extinction level, be it on lands or oceans. What can I do if it's normal that people shouldn't have the judgment at foreseeing it or understanding the true reason why it's happening? Or the strength of will to fight for anything else than entertainment or better work conditions? It's all over the fucking place! Die if you don't care any better than that? But don't worry, it's not your ego life that will suffer the most for it, as you wait for death to fall on your head to be convinced, you'll have it easy beside those living your legacy in a hundred years or so, when there will be no more hope except for your god to debark, condemned to rot on earth and live in regrets for a million years until we disappear, what a joy! But your version of leadership will still be rich and they will reign as usual, don't worry. That will last some time, the depression phase of humanity, where it will finally have time to develop its consciousness in a better way, and slowly acquiesce that potential is lost, where children will grow knowing that sky dreams are worthless illusions, children of absolute hate and frustration, I'm just among the first, we will survive as incapacitated like that until the true end that will take any form, overheating? Glaciation? Meteor strike? Pollution? Whatever, without space potential we'll disappear one way or the other.

While I'm saying that profiteers and manipulators are all waiting for the next opportunity to bring more adepts to the ego gods ideology, bigger profits, philanthropy, the planet is their land of opportunity. Even cataclysms are good for them, I can't even tell my opinion without immediately getting discredited with paranoia or conspiracy theory, no argument that doesn't satisfy their system is good enough to motivate them in a different direction. I should express my fears with violence, killing some of them for a little effect, instead of wasting my time. I tell you, and this is no joke; one the greatest enemy of humanity is not pollution or heating or whatever, those are under-products of mentalities developed through beliefs and systematization, it is ego people. And probably you'll have to attack their manipulation institutions, the invincible machines they created, to scare them a little, in the scenario they want to keep on to the end.

Half of what humanity have done to date is a tremendous waste of resources and life (including people), and this waste and destruction, both living and material, will continue unless priorities change at the fundamental level, and you won't get that with a stupid youtube challenge; you'll need civilized people (some are still far from that step, and some others are losing it) who care for life seriously (not stupidly) and don't act their consciousness superficially by following any emotive wave that passes, which is exactly the kind of self reinforcement attitude wanted by this reality, and it is a great transport of PMBBD.

When we'll be in face of our failing potential, everybody will come to the same conclusion; we reached that point because we followed and admired manipulators and profiteers in their ego competition, inadequate leadership.

I continually know as I write that I'm hard with people, or moralist, but know that it is far worse for me; my whole life have been a fight, it's my greatest unconscious skill; throwing myself in the worst pile of troubles I can find! But does a single person on this earth will ever know in all my life what I truly wanted in life? You think I enjoy my life? You think I enjoy writing this? I don't like writing! My life is a whole chore, my work a weight I must continually justify, you understand that? Because I don't like this reality, I don't want to be part of it, I don't want to encourage it, and I don't like hating people, but I won't quit my soul so I'll take my responsibility to the end, I'll never bow to this hell, and I want my enemies to disappear, poof! In the best of scenario for them... That way good people will finally have a chance. I don't like to feel I'm wasting my life, and you cannot tell me I feel that way because I'm no Christian or atheist or that I don't follow psy directions or take medication to change my mind, or don't watch TV. You went through my other chapters, you know my logic, I write because I'm driven by life and its principles, I'm the pure stuff, all what have been twisted by manipulators was meant to come straight to me for a conclusion. If someone develops a different, maybe not better, but at least equivalent, view of everything, you absolutely cannot make him bow to a conflicting ideal, that's the problem, and the deeper or more complete his vision, the more you're stuck with it, to the extreme point that either you work toward developing the new ideal or ignore or kill him, particularly if he created the conflicting fundamental philosophy to your own as the drive of his life, created, not read somewhere or tested at school. And that's what this reality do "unconsciously"; people who stand for things without breaking or bending under the weight of bullshit end-up carrying far more than their weight, often while living the worst life; there is the path of least resistance and there is the path of absolute resistance.

Here it is at the extreme point that it's even hard to tell my opinion, or have my own attitude, without getting a dose of mental or physical violence, resistance; I've been attacked for all kind of stupid reasons, tagged with all kind of psy problems, for telling how I see things. Maybe I was younger, and I did candidly, or virulently, or romantically, but the result is the same, and writing my vision proved I was not crazy, even if I had to take a form adequate to say it, and use the tools I could find to reach my goal, which is logically what pissed me off raised to psychosis status, and it came naturally, it may even be possible that what you see as a problem in me is just the difference between not becoming what the reality wanted of me versus what life wanted of me. And now I try to adapt the 2, bring them together as much in reality as within me. And you can bet it's not easy to be a judge of that, I was total destroy at the beginning, but now it's father reality that will give birth to a new reality. The same for the vision of the new reality that was quite extreme at the beginning, but now my vision is like an amalgam of socialism and capitalism with life as the monetary philosophy behind it. All that doesn't remove all what I developed as a vision, but things are so perfect that I may as well succeed if I continue to see this perfection, which is that we are at the perfect point to do it, equilibrium is possible, I learned to walk the line as I ripped myself apart to keep on standing... I opened the possibility and the most extraordinary part is the path I had to take to do it, really, it's like totally unlikely, but here it is, I see it, it's all the magic. I made of the whole world my enemy, even god, so I could better redesign everything, even god... Still, at the beginning, I really saw it as being possessed by life, or being closer to myself, or having extreme empathy for life, it was all a matter of life and believing I could develop the capacity to express it. I still sound a bit weird, as I learned English, and the text is still young, but I can take the attitude to be normal, I could have forgotten all this, seriously, but I saw it as an expression of life within me, and I totally accept that my brain took a bit of a crazy form to succeed, in fact, I pertinently know that there is like 2 of me, a normal person that can act normally, and the character I developed from expressing my soul, it's just that I decided to explore to the later, see what he has to say, and I used extreme bad feelings to give me the power to express it, because I know that starting from 0 today I wouldn't do it, I just entrapped myself, if I'm to be condemned...why not? I have nothing better to do with my life...I even sometimes enjoy this, being faced with the way my mind took form, finding why when you understand how far you've been, there's as much pride as there is humility, yourself finding the tools to justify , seeing things taking form, the unbelievable value on par with the unbelievable quest, flushing all these people who knew better because they where unconstructive toward what's important to me, or gave unnecessary troubles while I knew I already had too much to deal with, knowing things had to be like that, I did exactly what I had to do, half possessed (life), half pushed (god), it's crazy, I don't think many people lived what I lived.

If what I do ends-up of any value in this reality, then don't blame me for the difficulty, I created the argumentation to make possible another reality, what did you do? What will you do? Work to make it impossible? Probably, then wait for extraterrestrials to question your ways, or reap what you sowed; you don't need to think that the troubles you'll reap will be my fault if you failed to take a better path before too late, maybe I should do nothing just to skip hearing baby bitching while people are already dying at the thousands at repetition. I'm not the cause of what's coming, never been, never embarked in this boat, nobody will put the fault on my shoulders if people die trying to skip losing potential, dying while still trying to prove they were doing things in their best way, justifying evil. Nobody will twist my work to make it a displacement reflection of their failures on me; no religious crackpot will tag me as the antichrist either.

And if you're so good you don't need my opinion, then tell me what I must do? What is my responsibility? Do nothing to understand and describe this storm in my head? Encourage this reality to continue even if it is contrary to the conclusions I've come to? Maybe I should sacrifice like your Christ so you do worst, while being happy to be rid of me so you can continue without moralist people. And maybe that's what really happened, he defended straight principles while moralizing and re-defining evil, and once dead, evil was very happy to contort everything...Prove the contrary of all what he stood for, instead of putting frankness as the top brick they put manipulation and started right at the fundamental, stagnating life evolution right there, to the point that bullshit will be the cause of the end of humanity if he saw truth as what life is made of, and that's probably what the philosopher said, but who's to believe this 2000 years ago when we can't even see it today? Where manipulators will profit from all the good I wrote to say they thought, or already knew, about it and adjust everything and manipulate to serve ego reality? While crediting me for all the ugly stuff while at it...

This reality will be in denial all the way to the failure of life, it is evil and it will twist everything to save the face and not put responsibility where it should be, it will even end-up as god's fault in the end, nobody has responsibility in nothing so we can continue on the same path worsening things and keeping the problem hidden in luxury homes (bunkers), and you'll applaud and dance when they'll get out for a show. At least by putting everything on god's shoulders you'll have proven you're nothing, your judgment is worthless, giving me the final word, thank you for the experience and everything...

This reality wanted me under a different form than myself but it failed, it failed right in the face of the reason for its existence, as an experience in evil that succeed exemplarily since we are failing, and I am the last point, your last chance; you use me to strengthen your reality and manipulate and you're done and nothing you'll do, no effort will save you. Laughable, but here I am, your worst fear, your worst nightmare, still alive and not done, I have a vengeance to distribute for all what manipulators and profiteers caused as sufferings, all those who didn't stand for what's most important, and sorry for you if I quickly revolted against manipulation, you failed to make me kneel in front of your god, right at the start, by forcing me to a religion that pissed me off! Which made me understand the last place to look for myself would be through your learning institutions.

My parents failed to teach me how to live, Christianity failed to teach me how to live, learning institutions failed to teach me how to live, the army failed to teach me how to live, media people failed to teach me how to live, science failed to teach me how to live and psychology too, this reality failed wholefully at it whatever its fantastic power and expanse. Only me succeeded at teaching myself how to live because adults are the one that don't know how to live, not me, and it is me that is teaching how to live now, because I can and I'm forced to it by being myself and facing a reality that don't know how to live to the point of failing life.

You think this is the best humanity can do? If so, then, after all what I explained, I'm more than justified to hate and diabolize as much as I want. You get the idea. There are no daemons where there are no gods, so wake up! If there weren't so many living gods, I wouldn't pass my time demonizing ok? Besides, there will never be enough demonization in this book to be more than an infinite fraction of a fraction of a percentage of the worldwide historical totality of indoctrination and sufferings and selection to implant the ego-gods ideology.

Sure that if you "love" this reality, then there is no more hope for you, disappear in the best of scenario, or suffer my vengeance as an enemy of life, and laugh while you still can, to worsen your state, nothing special there, you got a history of people serving this reality who embarked like you, so sure of themselves and their leadership, where everything is normal and the way it should be, anything else can only be wrong, leadership meant to end as a sect of sex crackpots...

There are always more pressing matters, isn't it? I can understand "everybody's" problems, "everybody" is justified, so what can I say? I have to be angry for the pleasure of not selling my soul to the devil, just because I'm lucky it happened to me? Yeah, someone put all my luck in that tight spot, the worst is that I do feel lucky...As I profit from the system to eat cheap food, sleep on a sofa, you wash my clothes at the hand, not very funny for someone that doesn't like to do things cheaply...Everyday every week every month every year nothing changes or they worsen from more twisted austerity arguments, and you're lucky to have flushed everybody since you feel continually bad being that cheap, even for my birthday... Am I lucky to not have 200$ to introduce myself an adequate girl? Probably, I tell you, everything had to be perfect for my coming...That may be laughable, the world turning around my megalomaniacal humility where narcissism is illegal, but I tell you everything coincides as I walk the fine line that is drawn from life upon this world, a line that transform as a crack behind me, for evil to fall in their burning hell...Even if I wanted to escape my destiny I couldn't do it, and not only because of "magical" forces that that I decided to interpret as hints to act in a certain manner, most of which I keep taboo, but old things that I did in youth too, far before deciding to take this path, that came back with profound meanings, like forging a something in my youth that would come to represent my destiny 25 years later, forgotten for as long as I didn't come to a big revelation, dreams too, old decisions limiting my options too, like being unable to live in woods because I can't have a gun to hunt since I decided to keep a stupid criminal file as a protest, but how would I know the reality of the world live in if I lived in the woods? Which in turn becomes an argument to define an aspect of good and evil; the fundamental right to have a true view of reality to form my judgment, the right for knowledge to be free and available to everybody, invalidating a vast slab of the philosophy this reality is based on. If the earth is controlled and exploited and used to serve an ideology, then that invalidates any arguments that I should go live in woods to fish in your lakes without paying for a permit, hunt your "protected" species without paying for a permit and out of season while building a camp without paying for a permit, all that without paying for a passage right on your controlled exploitation zones (since you separated all the wilderness for exploitation). I'm lucky, because I understand that if you don't work for this reality then you are condemned to either be a ghost or a criminal. If you are an illegal criminal, you are part of the reality (whatever you hate it or not) even though it will make you a "bad" guy. So you don't have a choice to sell drugs and help this reality by creating more dependence and "bad" people, many of which will probably want to repent by working harder later, as either you have more money or you live an impossible life.

And since we are run by legal gangs of criminals, the push is to take care of criminals, criminals understand criminals, and gods need to take care of its unconscious failures... That's why we hear such psy stupidities like the care we give our criminals is a reflection of the evolution of a civilization. Having rampaging criminals, legal and illegal, or spending tons of money for their wellbeing is not a reflection of how good or evolved a civilization is, it is exactly the contrary, it is more a reflection of how evil it is, give them women, candies, tolerance, compassion, psy, whatever the invention, but it remains that if, as adults, they can't accept the most basic principles from which a civilization raises and survive without valid justifications, they are enemies.

Never forget that people can go to the extent of killing themselves; are they assassins? Adult people who don't care about life are meant to die, they borrow from potential and they are a debt to the future, they're just lucky to live in such a compassionate and "loving" reality that understand them very well...And I'm not intolerant, I already told you my tolerance finds its limits in history and repeated grave stupidity. As a matter of fact, in day to day activities, you may discover that I'm almost infinitively tolerant; little, normal or dependence things that would affect many people would hardly affect me, and that is because I choose my intolerances myself from consciousness and deductive logic, or judgment. I wouldn't ask that to criminals.

It's always your choice from which angle you want to see things, so it is understandable that in this reality, criminal have more value than me in actual logical fact of reality, since there is more money invested in their survival than in mine... I say that no poor people, not a single one, can be less costly to civilization than an unconscious killer in all its associated costs, and any psy suggesting otherwise has a problem in the brain. And I'm not even talking about the criminals who take unfairly... And this is another reality condemnation, meaning this reality cannot change or repair the situation, too late, we are like that now, the worst criminals systemized themselves profit structures in a system that do everything to prevent uprisings... We'll prefer to respect and help assassins, pedophiles and people who steal millions than people like me; I'm last, in the streets, but I'm not dead.

Strange that I have all these thought and feelings all boiling at the limit of explosion, but my future is so uncertain. In fact, if this reality succeeded at cheating me of this expression (which I seems to think it's indirectly doing), then who would guess or even believe that I've been anything else than a nothing? If I end-up taking drugs to escape this reality or destroy my mind and stop thinking, then I'll just have been a socially assisted that profited from the system all my life because it's the best system and everybody is supposed to be a millionaire! But, yeah, someday a pint of milk will cost a million... And you better not suicide, they'll find reasons so ridiculous you'll turn over in your tomb, like the guy didn't care about life, not even his own life...

What's wrong with you anyways? Isn't it what I'm supposed to do in the philosophy of this reality? "Profit from life as much as I can"? I heard that song I don't know how many time, so why don't you stop telling me that I profit from the system? It's just that socially assisted people don't have the right too? Is that it? We're just not people like you? And how in hell can you use the word "profiting" to describe my situation? Oh! Profiting from the system is different than profiting from life? It's worst and unacceptable? Besides, who profit from the system they made for themselves? And to add profound insult to injury, I've been accused of being ego for my attitude of sacrificing everything not to encourage ego reality, I hope those that did are remembering me now, you were probably thinking "he who do not answer consent", but as it is often the case, your old manipulative wisdom was all wrong.

The trick is to kill some rich, thus putting a lot of weight on the good side of your balance, and that way they'll invest more in your name, you'll have taken the worth of a few lives, the equivalent of a million buck legal criminal, and people won't remember you as a costly social assisted that profited from the system all its life, you'll even make friends and find admirers, and some pretty girl will fall in "love" with you at once...yeah, but you'll have become a part of this reality, so no, don't kill people, stay poor and cumulate frustration, maybe someday you'll develop the talent to write a book where it will explode all over the place in psychotic hate for all, then some psy will spot your malady, and will try to influence the result toward their vision...Fuck em! Don't forget that only you can change this reality and it is true, if you understand some things young enough independently, while other limit their mind adapting and specializing for profits and running everywhere for entertainment...

Things are so mixed up that we can't even use the usual channels of learning, its standards would fail everything; if I had learned to write well, I'd probably not have been able to write what's truly on my mind because what cause me to revolt is a fantastically big and complex puzzle which developed with lots of time in my head, and I can only feel what directions I must take; when you walk through smoke you got to feel a lot to find your way, transforming these feelings in a logical, true, usable and transmissible manner is the hard part, as a sense of life...

As for those assholes under social assistance that you condemned to your system, who profit from it in your vision of liberty, I bet most of them have better "hidden" reasons to be like that than you for embracing and succeeding, but I guess you'll need anybody with a different opinion dead to prove you were right...Maybe half of the socially assisted have truly wrong reasons to be, the rest are justified, some even work! But what they do is not visually evident, and yes there are some that are against this reality, or world, and they surely won't get a job for you! The only reason they skip killing may be exactly this reason; you permit them to survive, while they should have the right to far more. Either they put a bullet in their head, either they start killing, or you close your mouth and let them survive, with vastly more potential at doing something good that the hordes that eternally encourage this terminally sick reality that have been kept alive a thousand year too long simply by those continual and eternal workers who are convinced by artifices...

I say that the measure of evolution is not in the care we take of our criminals, it is in the quantity of them and attitude of the many, and many more factors. Only a very incompetent manipulator would make such a twisted affirmation. And don't come at me with liberty bullshit; you want to see my liberties in the last 10 years? And I know the situation is different, yet, this whole attitude of pressure on those who don't seek profits at all legal cost is worth war. And who apart a revolted poor have the attitude necessary to kick your ass for something better? You want them to hate everything? You think it's a singer that will do it? A newsman? A politician? A superstar? You? Maybe many poor people hide more complexity than you think, it's just that they may not have the tools to express it at your standard, or the ability, or their situation (like stress and survival priorities) makes it unlikely. I even bet they have a harder time succeeding at publishing, how many books written by poor people pass the test of literary agents? I'd be curious about that one...But they have the liberty to self-publish! Yeah, while it cost many thousands of dollars...

The socially assisted people I met were no worse than anybody else, whatever they are not well educated by the reality, or they didn't adapt to it, or didn't survive what this reality threw at them. Some even destroy their lives in your face because all other ways of expressing themselves have been proven to end-up in the garbage, and you hide it, laugh at it and worsen it with your attitude and experts know it all know nothing, to continue the selection...At least they can survive without much and they are more independent, it's not that they can't work; they don't do it because they don't want to, or the mix in their head is stronger than the vision they are implanted, or whatever reasons, for some. Socially assisted people are not the problem, the people pointing at them are, they eliminate all chances for something else by walking forever in the direction of the throng, ablating whole slabs of mind development and possibilities in others by their certitude, too susceptible to PMBBD, as long as the message is provided by someone whose job is to distribute it (like politicians), but TV and pub is more subtle and hypocrite, particularly if it's hidden under a cute façade, and full of smiling, gregarine people jumping in happiness all around in wow! new! and flashing bewilderments with some effects. They got the system that bought them their possessions and intelligence to defend, they invested their lives, so they follow hype and fall back to entertainment when they finally have time, too much of a chore questioning independently and profoundly, it's too hard without conflict socially, unless LSD, it's other people's adapted jobs to provide philosophy, or facebook memes that sound likeable, maybe a dose at school at an inadequate time under an inadequate form, while watching TV shows of some sect guru god that ended-up badly, to instill fear in alternatives...

We spent all our history building our condemnation, developing the argumentation to render any other possibility, an "evil" thing, or at best something to be ignored or competed. And our closed mind to try different ways, not variation of the same thing (raisin wine) is a bet on our survival since no other options exists if this one fails, and knowing what I know today, you can bet I wouldn't bet on it, particularly if we continue putting most of our energy forever fighting (including people) all the things that will critically go wrong one after the other in the name of preserving an inadequate system we have chosen to encourage as the only way, all the while making of humanity an enemy of life and all other stable civilizations that could exist in the galaxy...

As for me, my problem is that I work from consciousness. I believed in its power right from the start to steer me. So while I grow laboriously from consciousness, people all around me do it from a reality formula like babies, life mostly an unconscious thing with well defined responsibilities, until adulthood, where consciousness becomes a defense and a tool to reproduce the formula, and to justify and gain more in the ego competition, dealing with fears too, whatever the form. The process of growing a success invalidates the possibility to think differently, you didn't test, you didn't fight, only superficially, and now you believe it is of no use fighting to truly change things, you got to protect so won't do it. If nobody can reach adulthood with the ability and will to do it, then civilization is condemned to the path of reacting to pressures in a self-protection way, until there is only money related protests.

But I believe there is always a will, life will always force it, so younger people still can carry these feelings that are in an inadequate form for this reality, youth stuff that they should ignore until they're embarked adults, out of necessity, everybody has a price, or die making the selection, or survive to survive, whatever. Those who have time to think independently and the will to comprehend beyond socialization are probably the ones with most potential, there may even be an unexpressed or repressed will there (more than in people that are controlling things or profiting or believing things are allright for sure), but those people are better strengthen their defenses against PMBBD because the devil will find ways to use it to continue on its quest to profit as fast as possible from anything or any trend.

Now, I understand that everybody has a best way, so I surely won't say people are supposed to think no end to make sense out of hell, most would fall deep into depression and drugs immediately; someone who likes things to be moving is an asset for any reality, there are all kind of people, but they have a minimum responsibility to use their judgment as best as possible, and for that they must look at the truth, if they can't survive it then they were meant to die or revolt. Even a physical fighter or warrior (yes those will always exist and will always be as important as any scientist) should not fight just because he has it in him, he must have enemies and he must have reasons, unless it's all entertainment? Showing off? And I'm not talking about soldiers or policemen, those are not warriors, they are mercenaries paid to defend the system of laws dictating what and who is good and evil for this reality.

The last true warriors are protesters who fight to the blood, like for justice, whatever they drink and smoke, they may be in prison tomorrow. When will you see the police or the army take their side? Eh? Never, those defend legal criminals who pay them, they do their job, they are weapons or tools with needs, they are used to enforce the way of the ones who pay them, even if they truly fight some evident (superficial) aspect of evil while they defend the biggest source of it; systemized unfairness. So it is only logical that they control or attack or imprison the victims of injustice (evil), the protesters, or the disgruntled of those injustices, and those who don't want to serve the devil...Now, if a warrior is all lifelong under PMBBD influences and ego dreams, how can he have the discernment to build himself a good ideal to direct his strengths? And physical prowess make a man feel in his element; I weighed 190 lbs of pure muscle and agility at my best, and when your body is made for it, you can scare a whole gym on steroids, maybe not, but when you're pissed-off you think that body don't want to show it?
Had I really wanted, apart from becoming a movie "super" "star" of the universe, I could have become very good at any one sport (not swimming though I go straight down, I can swim, but just to get out of the water), running or cycling no end not a problem, fabulous reflexes and agility, I could have been a god of some sport you know. But I lost a lot, not agility and flexibility though, and to this day I have a an horizontal bar in my apartment where I do suites of twisted things people would have a hard time understanding how, and I lift attached car batteries for some arms. But it's just to keep an illusion of health, with time I lost much air to smoke, and I became so creaky it's scary; I can crack almost any bones, even things that are not bones... I can crack my brain, I feel the bones moving a little; someday something's going to slip... And creaking my neck makes a wonderful noise, it's like I have a multi position neck, and it feels so good. You wouldn't want to hear my knuckles though, the worst noise come when I somewhat extend my arms in front of me to bring my hand together, palm against palm, then I give I big strength impulsion, croick! My toes make cute little noises, one of my feet creak every step I take from childhood and I never felt pain there, it's just a handicap when you make stealth plans in the night. But enough of how good I am at creaking.

I never liked the idea of becoming a show-off or a clown making entertainment, I prefer a real fight, a cause that's serious with a bit of humor in it, but even if you are the greatest fighter, this reality will see you as entertainment; people train for the show. Your only serious option is to join the army gang and mentality, which are slowly becoming a show too. If not, then you end up in prison; you just have to drink some alcohol and meet some protected monsters...

People with a fighting spirit should ideally do it for a cause, at least until they are older, if not they'll do like anybody else in this reality; profit as much as they can, with strength as a tool. But everything is redirected for peaceful behavior, fight for entertainment and give the money to keep your cause eternal, cause that probably got a rich on top with philanthropists buzzing around... Now that was just specifics, I see life more and more in any fighter against this system, soon I'll admire those people who throw rocks at windows, at policemen, who turn over their cars and set things on fire, I'll wish them the longest of life and lots of luck, but they better be serious about it, and not only do it for profits, even if a reward is not to pass by; they may be the last chance for a better future even if they burn the whole place down and create tremendous setbacks.

With consciousness, you can control self-inflation and its tendency to decrease life's value with wrong priorities, we can be a competitive civilization escaping in entertainment dependences while life laws smite at us until we disappear, or we can clean this mess if we stop acting stupid, and it can be done while continually increasing our happiness. You're lucky I'm an incredibly positive person since I could abandon saying it's too late to be worth any true efforts at changing things and just profit from life. My great positivism permits me to ignore this to survive, and I believe we have not yet lost the potential to make a better world for life and spread it in the galaxy. I'll be such a positive person until I die but my positivism absolutely doesn't applies to this reality, so don't bother asking my opinion about it, you know what it will look like. I'm not negative or fatalist, I'm constructive, I form my opinion and explain and try to find solutions, it's you that's doing fatal stuff, not me.

But yeah, you could say it's my fault, my problem if I don't like it, I just have to adapt, tolerate, accept, pardon, skew my vision, and use the tools available, but I don't like the way those tools are used, so I just have to change things, it's all my problem anyway, and responsibility! If people want to keep things as they are, then it is truly my problem, and my vision of things is mine. And how can you change something when people don't care about it anyways? When they're under PMBBD influences of all sorts? When they all think they are already changing? And their leaders got change and freedom as manipulation tools? Or making a revolution is a matter of getting 50 000 protesters to change a government measure? When you're not an expert? You got to get people to care, yes, but how do you do that when you're powerless in face of the PMBBD machine and all its facets? And when you need to understand things at the level of what you want to change in the best way that make sense; how can I understand all this reality in all its facets?

But I made my idea, and it is to attack and defend on my battleground, which is small but strong, I'll make an invincible point, and from that I can only expand. As for you, you had enough difficulties adapting and tolerating to your hierarchy system, so where else than on the shoulders of the most innocent (young or poor) people could the responsibility of changing things end up? Eh! Now that you are the adult citizen with far more important responsibilities, like protecting your cumulated stuff, like passing your time in a competition of image (so many things to hide...).

Somebody got to invent ideals, somebody got to fight for those and defend them, but people that could care are already under PMBBD and profited from, even your specific protest group, the rest are inefficient at getting their opinion across or through. Yes I do believe many people are pissed-off for valid selfless reasons, and writing all this I know it's a waste of time making sense, and what do you do if you have a spirit like mine but can't express it? I guess you go bad one way or another, you disappear in bad feelings or finally embark. I know I'm not alone, but where are my people? I don't see them! Pressure selection I guess. So yes it's my responsibility now, everything is, this whole earth is my problem because I don't see valid alternatives, billions of people but I don't see fighters. Prisons are filled for the wrong reasons, but I do see martial law now and then, and special laws... So the selection continues, making itself a saint image these days, probably for judgment day of the façade they created. And the worst is that you'll need your god at it because you are unconsciously creating the situation where only your god can have the judgment to see through your lies, and save things. Everybody thinks himself good anyway, only past innocent mistakes, and past is all your life to this day, so everybody's good on judgment day!

Would you spot your god walking among you anyways? I bet you'd be too confused... What would be his experience of your reality? And if he tried to do things in a human way, try to help the betterment of life in a human way, try to become popular and change things in a good way, what do you think a reality of little jealous gods would make of him? How about your vision of good and bad? Well, maybe you're overwhelmed in visions too, there are many to choose from, and divide from too...Who can do and who will do something, particularly with all the historical examples, filtered through PMBBD this way and that? No, I don't want to be like you, I don't want to think like you, if I don't want to see your psy, take your chemicals, watch your vampire movies, or read your happiness PMBBD that fill the pockets of profit dreamers!

I have nobody to admire in this reality, so go back to your jobs and have fun in your "love" for your reality because, even if I try to truly change things, you'll reject it, spit on it, dump it, you'll never be satisfied, I'll never make enough efforts, it will never be to your standards, you'll never even care about it long enough to have an effect! You need candies and encouragements to do something, you wait for your god to tell you how to act with your consciousness, you need a boost to work, or a kick, a book recipe, we call that a "tobal a batteries" in my corner. You don't have time to waste reading or thinking about serious stuff out of the context of your reality, you do it at work, at school, or while reading a paper, for entertainment or self-boasting, or to better manipulate and profit.

Me too I don't explore serious subjects in books, and I may understand why peopled don't want to, but at least I explore those subjects and I'm sure I'd be impressed by the pile of books I replaced by my thinking or the book reading time equivalent of the thinking I made over serious subjects.

What gives me the right to write like this? Not only do I have the right by your vision of god, but I'm kind of forced to it with my mind because almost all the problems I talk about are well known, accepted, tolerated, even defended, they have become intrinsic to this reality, part of the business, and I see nothing really meant to have a serious effect. In fact, our life value is worsening. Or you could say it's all a matter of time, time is too short, so I prefer to die saying I tried to act with consciousness, than dying saying I tried to profit from life as much as possible, why should you care? I'll never have enough time to be satisfied and I refuse to live a parody of living, and I'm too complex not to end-up deceived, and everybody die, as time pass by, and I'm a man of possibilities so I'll die full of possibilities. Or you could say I don't like the form of your competition so I do a unique thing. Or I refuse to walk a path that is against what I stand for, and if I do nothing I'll be tagged as evil from passing my life in silence doing nothing, just profiting from your system. So I explain, I justify, I do what I have to do, even if I know the extreme of thinking to keep my mind open will be confounded for a mental problem.

What about the good people who are responsible for this hell because they don't act? I think I'm good, and this is my action, but isn't hell paved with good intents? So I should die in silence because my intents are good but I don't want to contribute to hell? What do you want? That I act or not? Ah, I know, contribute; stop thinking and writing and grab a pick and make some bricks! What can I do? Listen to what bosses say I should do with my life? Listen to what psy say I should be? What if I cannot? Can I say why I think I can't? Even freedom of thinking is bullshit? And what if I end-up with the conclusion that this reality is inadequate for me, or life altogether? What's so wrong with it that I feel such an enemy? Why are there so many systems and laws to prevent me from thinking independently, free from pressures? It's liberty? No, but like it, it has limitations, laws and a basis, so do I invent another reality that would permit my thinking to express itself under an association structure? And how do you make another reality? How do I express all that to people who are already invested? All the way to the philosophy and spirituality of their life? So it doesn't feel all worthless? How can I justify the need for a different way without being moralist? Without judging humanity, civilization and its people? Do I close my mouth? It would be far simpler, but the easiest or fastest path is rarely the best one, so I take the responsibility my mind imposes upon me, and I go as far as my capacities. I must explain everything, generally speaking, since I can do it, and I must have the liberty without manipulation to do it so I use the only people reaching tool not limited in format, or totally under the control of manipulators, while supposing I'll get publicized, and I try to think of every detail so my work is strong enough not to crumble in evil hands, which I can only see as adversity. So I'm forced to continually slip out of my subject, to explain factors as preventive measures, or to seize an opportunity to explain something that will be important in future chapters, to make everything fits like the perfect puzzle I always knew was there, and even if I did not piece it together perfectly and a few pieces are missing (holes for manipulators and profiteers to corrupt everything, just be careful; the material is made out of possibilities)

So it's all my problem if I decided to become me, I guess that it's logical in hell that everybody is innocent of making it, and you don't point fingers to responsible in hell, as responsibility bounce around infinitively until it is the least responsible that end-up with the problem... So I'll be bad for telling what is the problem, what attitudes led to it, and a generalized pouting from hell's gremlins is probably what I'll reap, since if changes are needed, they'll do them only to make their system more invincible or cute; they'll try some sect's insane project for a sure fail if it's cute enough...

Still, whatever the totality of efforts made to select, there will always pop up someone like me that will revolt against this reality with justifications, intelligence is a sense, and it will displace and take questionable forms to question your wisdom. Then you will have to find new tricks and tools to manipulate better, but I'll still come back, the more you condemn yourself to this path, the stronger I'll become, until you fail.

I'm alien to this reality, I don't like it, and I won't pass my life without saying a word why, and in what environment I'd like to live in. That's why I sometimes sound "psychotic" or "childish"; you think an alien is supposed to be a standard babbling human like you? Wrong, but you could see it as coming from the difficulty of my goal, from the break between ideologies running in a different direction mixed with language, from being ripped apart between my body that want to feel more alive and my mind that makes me "lazy", between the sky and the earth, from walking the line without losing equilibrium, from developing so much stuff in my head that growing in your version of an adult is inadequate, particularly if I'm out of your manipulation standards...Had I developed my mind to sound like you I wouldn't have developed to become me...I made myself different is simpler. When everybody has endorsed a standard way of talking it's easy to see any communication anomaly as bizarre or a sign of a mental problem, and it can be mind boggling, and frustrating to witness that there are people going strong in the opposite direction, colliding with yourself along the way, particularly when you got the history of human argumentation and standards going with you. Maybe for me, who is trying to build a momentum in my direction, you are the crazy ones suffering from a mental problem, you sound "bizarre", false, wrong, you scare me, and there are billions of you that make me feel uneasy wherever I go, and I'm trying to explain why with my infinitely more limited powers.

As a good person living in hell, it is not a place where I feel well, so we both sound wrong, we're both wrong in our vision, weird, sick, bizarre, pervert, like when you use love, your love version is a perversion to me, but people accepted and used the contortion from birth and heard it a million times in songs, throng of singers have exploited it to become rich, so it doesn't sound weird or false to you, even in my mind I don't understand what's love got to do everywhere. So I'm against it and fighting your version of love it's me that sounds weird to you. I guess that for hell "lovers" it is important to contort ideals or principles that could lead to the building of the basis for a paradise, particularly since the only way to explain such things is to be moralist and describe what is evil, who, and what attitudes are wrong. Most hate is based on conflict or difference. So for many people I'm someone that "diabolizes" their god, or their way of life, or their attitude, or the world they live in, like I'm the "evil" guy, while for me, I fight from what I feel is the truth, and I'm far from using all the tools this reality gave me the right to use if it made sense in its competitive philosophy...Besides, it's not me that started this game with the ego god thing, so if people don't want me to "diabolize" and "demonize", they just had to not start that god thing in the first place! There is no "Diablo" where there is no "god". Now, with all these gods strolling around in limousines and jets everywhere; how is it possible we're not living in paradise? And how is it possible that you will ignore or fight a way that has good ideals and principles? Is manipulation the greatest quality of your version of gods? Or is it bullshit?

And you can say I act like an ado all you want while you're doing the baby, I'm the one that is really trying to find a better path, but I understand that is not important to you since when you'll have the capacity to understand this you'll probably have a terminally developed attitude; you'll have the world's argumentation to back you up, to push you forever forward, and you won't find the energy to start an introspection you should have started as a young man when it was important. Some will find themselves so far away from themselves that they will seek to destroy what they didn't develop with all kind of PMBBD, like introspection is bad or a waste of time, they are action people. Some will even go to the extent of giving their ego competition philosophy the credit for anything good that happens. "Every great thing has been made by people who took without an afterthought" I heard this a few times, I think I'm going to vomit. And by the way, I don't write to show superiority, I write because I don't like this reality, because I fear the future it prepared for life, and because I needed to justify. I won't live all my life without saying a word. I write this as a responsibility, as my job, for "think job" people.

A lots of manipulation and bickering goes on in hell while the place grows hot, you learned to "love" it, you are responsible for its creation, you are responsible for its care so go back to work gremlins, I'll give you a bus card and a sexy massage, as long as you work on the pyramid or that you think "competition" or "ego" or "big" or "god" or "superior" everything will be all right, if not, the company will even pay you the psy! It's all culminating, everybody will be able to self-inflate competitively no end (in ego theory), so go right ahead, bow into submission before your reality as fast as you can in life or dream of how big you could be, use your heart, your strength, your mind, your will and your life to compete and enrich your manipulative idol, watch your screen, suck some alcohol, have some entertainment, de-inhibit yourself, fuck around and embark on a racist competition to make babies, don't think about bad stuff, laugh, they say it's unhealthy not to laugh, and don't forget to hold your head high, be proud! Work hard, accept, tolerate, adapt, be peaceful, compassionate and go to the psy, live unconsciously and let others invent you a consciousness instead of doing it yourself. Do some recycling or send some money to some foundation to appease any conscience that may try itself, don't forget that you have no responsibility except encouraging this reality, you do your best! You're worth 100%, get your personal wishes, luxuries, attention and vices granted and if someone must compromise, let it be the others, they're the ones who make too many babies, so "love" your ego gods or try becoming one! The pyramids are finished, we can't build more, it's time to...die? Or ask patience and pardon by making a life creation? A flower to life in an adequate terrain (reality), yes, but pervert it, give a flower to evil and the wrath of life will bring you regrets beyond hope.

Sounds like it, I am not a depressive self-accepted defeatist that sees pessimism everywhere and need to fuck to feel human, I won't lower my arms and live in acceptation of "dust to dust". If the world needs to be "saved", I will shout it as much as I want even if it's ridiculous to you, whatever your defeatist acceptance mentality or jealousy of people who want to do some truly life changing changes; in fact, if they forever fail it is because you're a terminally adapted loser that will never help; you'll even try to make them fail, you want people weaker than you, worse, you want them saints without a single imperfection in your view of perfection as a justification to spit on their effort if you have something superior in your view of good and evil. What you need is your god to give you a fucking lesson "Oh my God"!

Sorry, you perverted him into those from whom your sanity is dependent, who are better made to defend and reinforce your ideology, not change it for sure... As indispensable as Lucifer hidden in their luxury hole, they're hard to summon and when they get out to get attention, or to distribute hope, you can bet they have to show their best facet to their flash blinded admirers, but you'll still be lucky if you can touch one...All the manipulation machines are ready to bring them glory, some hardly eat or sleep if it doesn't cost over a hundred bucks, others need private jets or yachts or limousine with an escort to move their asses around, and next they'll pay themselves show-off trips to the super international space station to make some use of it. I can imagine the news around the world; big bills in space while at the same time there are 10 000 deaths in a cataclysm, or no better; the selection crying in a national funeral for a "super" "star" while 10 000 people die in a cataclysm, so tragic....

Well, it seems that bozo god Laliberty did exactly that, the cataclysm was not at the rendezvous though, and he didn't die to overload the social network in lamentations. We should strip the rich and invest 100 times more in space development, not send them in space to show off! I don't know why such escapades are not illegal, spitting boatloads of pollution and using rare technology and resources, something we'll forever have in limited quantity on earth unless we start having other goals or priorities than sending ego clowns in space showing their nose to the world, and come back saying he needed it to become a better person! I can't believe someone got enough money to do that anyway, where did he take it? What is this world doing? Laughing at the successful indoctrination of people, the insignificance of the selection? Is there someone that protested over this? Houou! Is someone there? I guess humanity got its judgment totally disabled by bullshit and hype, and it is worthless at fighting for what makes sense. That just can't happen man, sorry, it's an insult to any kind of true intelligence. But I guess entertainment is more important for the "rulers" of this reality than the survival of humanity, and yes it is about survival, if we fail spreading in space it won't be because we couldn't do it, it will be because our leadership structure (system) disabled our judgment and action-reaction capacity, leading to wrong beliefs and priorities, like sending clown assholes up there; it was not a priority in space investments, and it didn't satisfy any sane beliefs related to its usefulness.

But what can I do against the pub machine boosting the wonderful event, creating hype like it would be a cornerstone of human evolution, you wouldn't dare miss this moment of our history, almost as big in importance as a royal marriage! I hate camera manipulators and publicists who twist and hype everything fitting political agendas, defender of ego people and their business model, nationalist competitors, economic orgasmers and politicians suckers! And I want the right to destroy any invading camera without a hint of demonization from media people! Any camera that put pressures on me without my willingness! I don't want to project an image everywhere I go, I don't want to play comedy everywhere I go, I don't want to show off everywhere I go; I am not an attraction! You're lucky I don't destroy those cameras I spot everywhere, that I adapted, even if I feel invaded, even spied upon; hide them better, and if you need to overload the world in cameras to fight crime, then it's one more a proof that your reality is hell since it's worth the investment while people struggle to live adequately all over the place (I don't care it's an independent business "investment", I see thing globally, as a big pile of cameras, and all the people whose job it is to use them as turning around it in a counterproductive manner.) Someday I'll start a camera rampage and I'll have all the justifications to, even if those using the cameras will sure make me a criminal for it. In fact, most cameras exist to protect evil, to grow egos out of proportion (make gods) or protect "their" means, or ass, or stash or luxuries, make people feel insignificant, create hype, and many other negative things.

But too late isn't it? Cameras are so cool, wow! It's star strek stuff, perfect for more social, more PMBBD, more stupidities, more sex "emancipation", and no end of the world in sight! Only human degeneration. It's like the continuation of the big zoom face emphasis of TV, you need a big zoom face on your phone, you got to see to spot the truth, your imagination is meant for manipulation and entertainment, or is it an expression thing? Yeah, expressions behind beards and make-up, and worked to reality standards through selfies production and social cues satisfaction... Again, I wouldn't be pissed if my liberties were not forced by people who got the means to say they are the one that must have the liberty of doing what they want, like planting cameras in notebooks and phones factory default, and people are happy and dancing, it's cute, and new, wow! Very useful for all kind of things, just listen to the instructions of the one talking to you. Particularly with the new, wow! High speed! Super internet so near, with the new, wow! Face book full of friends so near, let's celebrate! Tinder, Twitter, Youtube Face book! Face, Face, Face Wow, WOW! WOW!!! Oh my God!!!

I feel so free without any of this, and my mind still works! Without a psy! I like these things, really, I even think everybody should have a cellular, it's a matter of evolution, again it's the way it is used and the form it took in hell that I don't like. There is a better or best place and order to everything, all these things are good, but no adequate reality to make best use of them, the first on the cake rules our liberties, manipulation and profits competition, which includes Google which is just another developing monopoly for control and exploitation of a developing communication structure, whatever they started as a bunch of kids in a garage with a wonderful story and Wow! Business plan! The end result is the same, every human starts a baby. Technologies develop within the limitations imposed to them while time advances, a lot dependent from the form of reality, and you can do nothing about it. I'm ready to say Google is a good company if its leadership structure is not "evil behind" and it is not meant to make a boss rich beyond luxury, and if it answers this question by no; do you impose something to people for your own interests (except an amount to provide your service)? Or do people need to pay to remove something? Or are you manipulating liberties or the truth? I know for one that Google Canada is highly influenced by the Canadian government, particularly ugly historical content, and it may even apply to the whole internet in Canada, since some stories that were big when I was young simply disappeared from internet Canada (there, and not there anymore a few years later). Then there is the news content that is very different from one country to the other, I mean the story is mostly the same, but some important aspects are omitted or emphasized in Canada, fucking-up my judgment, and that's in part why media people have no credibility to me, particularly if they get grants from a government...So Google Canada, is not an innocent search engine, far from it, it is a manipulation tool right down to the core, to the point that it can be used to encourage and spread prejudicial attitude against whole races as I already said in earlier chapters when talking about English Canadians attitude with Quebeckers, and the problem is directly related to the search engine (Google Canada), use a different one and the result is different (not necessarily better).

Your internet that you thing free and deep and dark and free costs so much I have to use it in libraries, took a form to defend the ego-gods ideology too, it's greatest power is manipulation, whatever it's super useful and full of content; I already said evil likes to profit from good people, manipulate them, it needs a lot of pretty to hide behind and fuck around with too, you have all that in hell...But as I already explained, that's to be expected at the height of the ego gods ideology; bullshit overload, and the result of that will be the worse one imaginable, be it in reality or through life systems, gods even the UI, particularly if these actions to manipulate the truth are done by supposedly exemplary people who shouldn't lie to masses...

Understanding that I should be paid to have pub enter my sight or ears, then pub imposed by lack of money from people to remove it is the worst way to do things since the pressure is still to profit as much as possible, while makes your revenues dependent from pub, and there are never enough revenues for the boss, investors, and shareholders...

In the end, that's what those 2 kids in their garage saw; a way to make money, whatever the embellished story they made later. Once rich you spend "your" money your way, a lot for image, but even if you are a rich saint in theory, you're still in troubles with me since your situation is a crime in itself. If you need or stash more than 250 000$ a year for yourself as life energy to be happy or to feel well, whatever the skills, and whatever you buy or manipulate yourself a universe of happy gremlins to carry you, you have reached a point of unfairness that makes you evil whatever you do. Can't understand? It's a general view of a principle making fairness possible, want it another way? The account of the most positive person, to life and people, should not be filled with more than that amount in one year, and no cheating. A work structure can do and no problem with a pyramid, and the top is the top, not 10 people or a small difference of pay. But I understand that it's easy to justify that you aint got the brains to see money as life, or the brains to understand that when you take too much it has a negative effect for others, who may have good and evil principles making sense, not good and evil for manipulation, immediately making them more valuable, because in the end, a job can be anything, like developing as good or evil people, or even perform at living the ideal of love, which is done by the pressure selection of this reality, what kind of attitudes end-up getting most means...But ego people don't see that, they're in a manipulative competition of profiting from life, and even luxury is not enough, they'll invest to get more, they want all the money of the world, then do some philanthropy on their incapacitated population ready to do anything to gain back what have been stolen from then, selecting. While singing their recipe of success evidently, or selling books where everybody is supposed to be a millionaire, or they are precursors at doing things, everybody must become like them as a justification of their "wisdom" and describing is the human psychology is the final word. And they work hard, they are more intelligent, all the good is thanks to them, all the evil is not or is necessary, whatever the argument, you can bet they'll use anything as a justification in superficial bullshit. Even reality versus possibilities is an argument, if technology exist it's thank to them (or war, since they want to persevere in their way and fear of death or losing their hegemony is the main drive that will force technological advancement, we're talking interdependence and war as a twisted justification to boast here), and you can't say the contrary since their way is the only way, all other options that have a serious potential to do things differently are eliminated competitively, so that they can keep their investment eternally, in their ego gods ideology. Remember how I see pyramids? As eternal structures to make one type of person rule forever, it's the equivalent of god or an eternal being, which is the same end result as never dying, which is the ultimate failure, since death exist exactly to prevent these kind of situations.

I know, they're such a pity, it's never their fault, and they can do nothing with the billions they're stashing, and it is true that redistributing would scrap everything and ruin the planet in this reality, what can I say they took the means and used half of these in self ass protection paranoia, all along their manipulated history to make their way invincible and interdependent, no way out of it, it is a final condemnation! But, why don't they put a few billions to experiment alternative systems? No, eh...

I don't know why we don't invest more to make people feel good and want to be, good people do something good in the end, and as a big bonus, it's not a facade for tons of evil! You don't have to be scared to make them comfortable, or spend trillions in PMBBD; they'll put pressure on themselves over time by themselves, if you got some kind of reality with good goals, if they don't unconsciously feel cheated...You don't have to make people evil by default by starting them in poverty and jealousy, like they're worth nothing unless they embark and start competing, while forwarding money to some rich, or spot an opportunity, while thinking revenues, or do creativity, while thinking revenues, and they're bad if they stay poor because everybody is supposed to be rich, since poorer people have a tendency to wear the evil coat in place of the other...

It's a shame the system if it is such a mess serving evil, that it contorted the value of things so much that it's practically impossible to form an adequate opinion of it before having to invest your life for a nice place to live and some decent food. We can inflate anything by having our view manipulated to deformation; you can count 10 000$ as gold plated dollars to submerge a poor under a mountain of money and you can count the same as hundred buck bills for the rich to carry in his pockets, all that while you need 100 people to have the equivalent negative effect of a single rich. And that applies to objects, objects replace life and people too; a yacht is 100 people living in poverty, what's better is that those 100 people represent potential. And don't start counting to say I'm wrong and things are fair; you don't have to have 100 people, it all depend on many limitations and aspects, like the number of population from which the reality is dependent from to reach efficiency in its goals; you can't have today's population increase their standard of living too much if more comfort equals less resources and more pollution, and you must limit them by laws since it's surely not an educational system made to fit the system that will successfully teach people the importance of controlling one's needs...So it's useless redistributing the means as reality form mentalities to interdependences, even if you skip a lot of evils by removing the means from inadequate people, redistributing for fairness is still invalid because people are not grown in a different reality.

It is evident to a baby mind of 6 month, when you look at all these vast cities and "super" "stars" that they should be living in a mentally evolved reality, it is automatically, unconsciously evident as soon as the human mind confront television that every ingredients are there to live well and do good things, it is evident that the minimal notion of comfort exists without hassles, it is automatic to a baby that he should jump of joy and be greatly motivated, just thinking technology is like a synonym of good. But everything takes the toilet when people hit the reality of things to become adapted adults, the mind ends-up already in heavy conflict very young, and there the reality goes at it throwing pedopsychiatric scientific truths about how children are and patati and patata and blablabla, and then we're surprised homosexuals make better babies. Yes or no? No to both, then who have yes to both? What was I saying again? Ah, we're not at an epoch where people say "the boss is running around in a horse drawn carriage, would possessing one make such a big difference to my life?" Not like that, but there are evidences of reality that set the mind on an unconscious track of development from logical extrapolations, the mind prepares itself to live in the reality it is guessing it will have to live in; if that includes cars everywhere, it is logical that the mind will work in function that the car is part of one's life. Now if you throw it a television full of rich and scintillating people discussing, women dancing half nude and singing let's fuck (love) everywhere while poor to the bones are being benedicted in brown rivers full of malaria, then it is the end of your education, things are decided, whatever you do, you just lost the trust of life and of your child, and you'll have to tell him to listen to you far more often for not much result, since it's life that question your judgment or ideal or strength of will versus wh. And all that will be wrongly interpreted by "intelligent" psy as "normal" or "natural" development phases, like the yes phase, then the no phase, then the maybe phase and then the fuck-off phase, which means exactly that. There goes your education, there goes your message. And I'm talking toward reality; the fuck-off phase may get retarded. All that doesn't prevent people from generally adapting at adulthood, manipulation can go a long way, and humans, contrarily to animals, are the ultimate adaptation aspect of life, the total, no environment is beyond them, you can make a slave society and it will work if you manipulate and limit the mind of people the right way...

The rich see the world as their own like atlas, or they're on top of the world, they're indispensable, and they need people under them limited, as a cheat for their competition, so they manage knowledge so that everybody is incomplete mentally, one way or the other, they need innocence to serve them, surely not highly knowledgeable people with good general judgment, those are problems meant to provide resistance, test and reinforce the system, prevention for future problems, since they are precursor from their ability to see farther, ahead, leadership. They'll be tools, particularly if they're good, until humanity is a ruin, from indoctrinated usurpers, popes after popes after popes into the final truth, twisting everything to keep on producing popes. They know resources are limited, they just find ways to ignore it, or displace responsibility, or compare themselves in expensive receptions, it's a production, to have a line waiting to fill their palaces for show. They are probably the people with the most contorted vision of good and evil, if they have one, the ones who care the less about life, so you can bet that whatever the description of evil you make they'll find a twisted manipulative argument to deny it, and you can bet that telling them they'll go to hell is laughable, that they all have a sect fitting their vision and awaiting their money.

All the system, all the reality is a self-justification to permit extraordinary unfairness, to forward the means to the greatest manipulators, humanity and the world is there for them to gang and profit, everything is systemized as a process to climb their profit pyramids. The same kind of twisted view applies to criminality amongst the rich versus criminality amongst the poor, like the term corruption, why don't they call it thievery? Why does a low end like me go straight to prison for years if he steals money and when it's someone that is already rich, who is not worth his richness from the start, why is it not seen as bad while it is far worst? What is this corruption stuff? Why is it a calculated normal factor? There shouldn't be corruption! None! If someone steals or makes a criminal or illegal action, then his place is in prison, not on some statistics about corruption! How the hell do they calculate corruption without knowing where the money is stolen anyway?

The means are in the pockets of the people who think they're worth more, so they decide as an investment. They want more, not less, and only people who develop as manipulator and profiteers like them can gain the means (including expensive influence) to truly change things, but why would they do it? What profits could they gain from doing it? They'll prefer to burn the means than having less, or maybe spending in philanthropy can be an investment in beauty, helping the poor, cataclysm victims, and your classic "African" that eats millions after another; aren't they living in a wonderful paradise from all the never ending extraordinary generosity? Or is it the black hole of the world? Something doesn't work somewhere... The African argument is mostly a PMBBD argument, it's like those fiscal "paradises" for the rich, just for different uses. Someday all those rich will have an African membership card, like they're part of a sect, or they'll carry a folding African they saved in their pocket for people who doubt, see! Philanthropy! Drop to your knees girl! Children are becoming a kind of protection for the rich too, or a proof of something. I know making less profit is out of the equation, the system doesn't work like that; there are investors, speculators, country competition, success stories to provide, and the stupid happy competition of who is the richest too.

A good person today cannot be forced to the same mental situation as in old slavery times, a good human needs to feel his ancestors worked for something other than marvels, and that it reaches to this day. Poverty from unfairness should have been eliminated a long time ago; we don't eat lard anymore. My ancestors didn't wish I'd be eating slabs of lard in 2000, and grain is no better, or fly burgers. They were told that poverty would end, that sicknesses would be healed, that good food for everybody was coming, even that unfairness would eventually end, but they'd have to work hard...And they believed on their knees, and they made the world with motivation; they worked hard. But they made it for the best liars and profiteers, a grave mistake, they've been had over and out, and now good people are truly tired and on their knees, the end is coming... So I'm not motivated, particularly when I look at where it will lead. I'm motivated to destroy though, so you can bet the rich need to pay for protection, to control and develop weapons before anybody else, and pay people to watch everything with cameras... There are no options where I feel I'd have a valuable effect toward my beliefs in this reality, but I still want to do something valuable for life, which includes those who stood for life, who tried to stand for what's good, who got something to show for it, even if they had to embark some, or if they have been had, to some extent; youth innocence is kind of low...

The condemnation here is that there are already twice too many people from the rutting country competition, energetically boosted baby making overload from family glorification to overdrive the economy, to steer thing without massive hysteria if you tell people that a better global standard of living requires more resources. Yeah, I'm exaggerating a little and birthrate is getting lower, they say, as they make family shows with tons of children, but the problem remains still as birthrate, like for everything else, is intertwined with everything, it's even dependent from contraceptives production, control of quite a few sicknesses is too...and did I talk about unfairness? Why some people are forced to remain in zoos, while Canadians spread on the territory they roamed in the first place? But I guess they just have to make a referendum to become independents (to become independent from being forced to dependence...exactly like Quebeckers who where independent, then made dependent with violence, then we should make a stupid referendum to gain our independence back...), a referendum they'll never win since there will always be more than half a population that is justified not wanting changes in their life, hurrah democracy!!! Only in another reality where territory growing formulae is appropriate to wanted population and where fairness is implanted all the way to territory and population, and done without cheating, can such limits be made acceptable to people; forget it completely in ego competition reality, birth limitation? Wtf! Just the suggestion of a monetary cap would throw everybody on the floor laughing, and you will never remove the liberty of profiteers to manipulate freely, 250 000$! fuckin joke! Even if I watered my wine double they'd still laugh. That's because they wouldn't buy yachts and jets anymore, they wouldn't have servants, so they sure won't work for such little change, they wouldn't survive! Yeah! They wouldn't survive! Their life would be a ruin! Like mine! This reality is their paradise, and you can't break it, it is all interdependent, a final form, we didn't stand for what's right adequately.

I should say that things exist because there is some good to it, everything got a best place, a best way, a best use. Principles are critical to a good civilization, but twist them and they lose much of their good strength, until they are worthless as a global value even if they can be good when used individually; a person will respect the truth of a principle while another will use it to manipulate and when added they equal 0. Everything has become like that, profiting from what's good to create unfairness or manipulate others or to do evil devaluates the good of it. I could say that Hollywood make a lot of good movies, some extraordinary, but the minimal notion of creating good judgment implies that I look at all the facets of the industry. Hyped people flash banged on the façade of things have a very poor judgment if a thing is good, even if they're still worth full value of judgment in everything that concern them, but such a notion is useless here since to use global judgment you'd have to provide the full tools of the subject, all the facets, all the arguments, in truth, nothing hidden, and this reality will never provide that since tons of stuff is hidden to better manipulate people, even then, the whole reality would fall in revolt crashes, wars, from the change in people's judgment. Everything in this reality will forever be manipulated for profits until we're an ant society, people's judgment under all kind of wrong pressures, competitions, and emphasizes, biased, manipulated.

I could say that for one excellent movie as a value of good, there is one citrus full of crap, and that's enough to put the industry on the so-so line. What puts it down under is how it condemns creativity to become an eternal source of profits, and the unfair means many take for themselves. When seen individually, on the PMBBD facet, you can't say something negative about most movies as they can be anything, but that's different when doing it globally, where repetition appears. And that's a limitation to people too; why do you think you are limited to a country line in the country competition? For liberty? No, to limit. All kind of levels of limitations exist so people can be controlled, exploited, manipulated, to create competition too, and it goes hand in hand with the ego-gods ideology, division for competition until there is only monopolies left, or a winner with inferiors servants. And when you're enclosed in your world with your friends, your religion, your territory, your mentality, your language and television, you feel more indispensable, you hold yourself together, and that's one of the use of this industry; to limit and control the mind, and to encourage ego as godhood too, from a lot of PMBBD since actors are acting.

If it was not for those rich gods I'd say it's not that bad though. What can I say, entertainment is a must for gods...But what we are fed is a general vision of things along the way, in big part what they want and dream of, even if there is something for anybody. I'll add that medias people should be limited in the hype they create to manipulate civilization to "love" rich people, particularly entertainment "stars". It is hard to judge a movie, we don't need media people to manipulate our judgment; you already want to enjoy a movie by default, not seek the wrongs of it, and that means the people of that industry scripting the movies must be as disconnected from reality as possible, and exemplary when available; there are many where it is evident there is a crappy character behind the story. And that's without saying that a lot of movie studios are rich sex sects that steals humanity creativity, twist it, and distribute a manipulated version, or what they like, or what don't disturb their order. Some are under governmental PMBBD influences too, pushing or defending their agenda, all the while publicizing politicians and "super" "stars" for free, even religions. All the way to movies, but these collusive relations are criminal and should be made illegal even in this reality since everything is supposed to be an independent business away from the incompetence of governments... For these reasons, I say most of the people in the television industry should be fired, from evil unfair admired actors treated like gods, to people who manipulate or condemn creativity. But that's ridiculous, my grenade is too small beside their explosions, where is my explosive stash? Effects? Ah, I'm useless then. I bet they got monopoly of a few technologies, and I bet they are very expensive to get for little people, and not because they are truly that expensive.

Someday in the future, people will understand how the entertainment industry condemned a lot of good creativity, how they limited the expansion of means by exploiting it like a mine, like any rich profiteer do, creating a movie monopoly where every new movie means new income for eternity, but that's the way of this reality, it is absolutely normal, don't question it. Don't ask yourself why aliens are either inferior clown, or super enemies that a super hero somehow destroy. They spread all kind of stupid ego attitudes related to age classes for future pointing of fingers too, an absolute vastness of "love" bullshit, the same for all the principles they twist by throwing them in movies like sage paroles distributed by super heroes. All this describes the ideal of many spheres of "society", pushed it on people hypocritically.

Now, these things are relatively normal for a civilization faced with movies the first time, all extraordinary and all, 100 years is short, but we'll see in 10 000 years how you'll appreciate those who dirtied or exploited creativity and principles to make a perversion of everything. So yes it is absolutely normal that our "wrongs" show in movies, that we make mistakes and stupid movies too, that people change to develop reality, I understand all that, my problem is when I can spot PMBBD at repetition, particularly if it's spread as an industry, like the new trend for vampires and monsters to become more and more friendly or stupid rose elephant; something you're supposed to fall in "love" with, there are a lot and that's perfect for the monsters of this reality. Vampire movies are greatly publicized and they exploit innocence to the max by implanting PMBBD and selling all kind of derived products which ado innocents manipulated by pub buy at the ton, those same ado dancing on "let's fuck" (a way of saying sex PMBBD), and the 10 headed hydra will put a sticker that say "for people over 18" while in truth most of its public is under 18...

Vampire movies are humanly degrading, they reflect a deep fear, but in the hands of profiteers, the source of the fear, the story got manipulated (can be the initial story if it was made with profits in mind) to reinforce the fear, making it more of a reality, to profit from innocence, all the way to associating vampirism with love. I'm talking about the emphasis on them being good sensual things drinking blood, full of secrets society stuff, and knowing everything from their long history of "loving" and deciding on whom to distribute eternal life (gods), which is dependent from sucking the life energy (money, means) of others. I wonder what the great thinkers said about this when it developed? What did the mind of people do? Adapt? Tolerate? Learn manners? I guess they were in a sexual revolution, and the rest were working and studying hard to get money, and for the more conscious; trying to form a family. And people always have other priorities. Are thinkers worthless? It's general stuff, not a specialty with a diploma, so their opinion is laughable?

Me, I will always have fun chopping to pieces gods who suck the life blood of others, particularly of innocence, instead of idealizing them and defending their system that represent their eternity...And desecraters of love are among the worst monsters of this world, but today, everything is manipulated to bring the youth to the worst blood suckers of this world, the youth must be in line to fuck with them and that's perfect like that in hell...I don't like vampires because of the way I see the mind forming in youth, and a money making industries profiting from innocence to twist minds as a reflection of itself is kind of sick to me...But what can I say when even Walt Disney uses tons of PMBBD on children for their profit machine and to grow mentalities in youth? It may not look like much, I know people don't see it that way, it's just an unconscious reinforcement doing its contribution for the pressure selection, enlarging tolerance, acceptance, as many young people adopt these contortions in their psyche, often for life, and it's allright, who cares, it's just a small bit of a gigantic process, but bits here and there comes to cumulates as a lot...With today's level of medicine we could live 100 years standard if we truly wanted, one fifth of that, around 20 years, should be as free as possible from insidious PMBBD for profits.

Now, isn't it strange humans fuck aliens no problem in many movies like it should be normal, while we don't see the true normal path of aliens fucking each others? So don't come here aliens, we are producing more and cuter vampires and monsters we "love", aliens are stupid or retards, like ET that looks like a shit, in fact, if I was looking at the matter from the good and evil angle, since it is always a matter of good and evil, I could say we should be the ones with a bad or stupid attitude in alien movies, but yes, evil continually fight and compete among themselves, and there got to be a winner...

It seems the industry is overloaded with crazies who makes it a challenge to fuck anything looking cute or innocent, people with the kind of attitude that brought many grave problems, mental as well as viral, to this world in their visionary "love" version, blood suckers only an option. And you better discard your godly subjugation, if we believe these religious stories of gods fucking with people, there's even one where a big dick god fucked animals before ripping through an adolescent...Aliens wanting to fuck with us is not more of an option than fucking with consenting animals, it's an opportunity to have laboratory rats, the only exception is if we're compatible for reproduction.

And stop the sex paranoia, you won't die, or you won't get atrophied testicles and penis, or lose the map for the G spot! Penises have always been there, their existence and erection is not dependent from your reality, exactly the contrary; we'll destroy both love and sexuality with twisted PMBBD, and pressure and profiting from innocence pedophilia attitude develops sexuality at its worse, true love in peace and comfort will develop it at its best.

Don't forget that all along I form my opinion I make myself an idea of who would have an appropriate attitude to survive in a different reality, and you can bet I definitively don't want today's sex revolutionaries to profit from the opportunity to spread their view of "love"; I don't make "love reality" so you can fuck with goats or an army! And I do my job of prevention, who else will do it? I surely won't let the matter in the hands of people who are not a reflection of my arguments and vision; politicians, psy, experts, all inadequate...

Vampires should be nicely associated with serpents, with a manipulative tongue slithering from each side of the mouth, biting and poisoning people. Then you have cutes vampires with many personalities, biting people and poisoning them with dependent eternal life. Like for many things, current vampire movies are mainly made for their mental displacement effects, reflecting the profundity of a conflicting unconscious state in the mind in those making them, their ideal they want to spread as positively as possible. In fact, the first vampire story should have been seen more as a problem in reality than as greatness of imagination from the author. The vision is there, but the vampires of this reality sure wouldn't want them as monsters, so the tangent they took ended-up serving their ideal, the same kind of tangent that directed Santa Claus to end-up reward children versus a vision that satisfied profiteers. So vampire stories, like Santa Claus, are a vessel to carry a hidden ideal as unconscious in the youth, maybe it was different in the past, but today they are a reflection of deep greed in some classes of people, and the fact that they are so spread is a proof of the depth of the conflicting situation and the success of the PMBBD. A civilization doesn't grow gigantic stories like that without strong connections to reality. Some of these connections are evident, they almost scream that some want to profit from innocence monetarily and sexually, see themselves as worth infinite life, youth, fuck anybody they want, enslave anybody, fly hidden in the night and fall on unsuspecting innocents, and more.

To say it bluntly, the vampire stories transformation as good "love" monsters for young people should have been heeded as an unconscious sign that humanity is getting sick in the head, yeah, that much, as it contains all the elements why. Even if the initial author wrote a gory gothic story from evil attitudes he witnessed, like cannibalism and blood drinking, it's still a clue to an evil aspect of the system. A people that accept such stories for its youth is losing its mind in its vision of death, and it will make a crisis to prove the contrary, further encouraging the development of sick minds for the sick aspect of civilization, while proving they are meant to live eternally, they have the right to profit from everything and everybody, fucking everybody, being served. The other side of the mouth will try to prove the contrary, evidently, playing innocents, manipulating, while covering the whole planet with themselves because they don't have what it takes to truly evolve past that point, they made themselves invincible with the best system to satisfy as many of their wishes as possible, competition as a filter to raise adequate mentalities to the top...

I understand that in old times it was not as evident, it didn't take much of a monster to overload people's brains, so it's all a slow process, most didn't realize that we were making something twisted with the story, it just developed to reflect something in reality. At some point we should have understood that the story have become only appropriate for adults though, but instead it was directly emphasized on young people, where it can have the greatest effect, it was applied as an accelerator of an ego and conflicting philosophy, and the monsters who profit from innocence got more power since vampires were made good, and they had an enemy, the evil lycanthropes; I explode both, sending a little of the life energy they consumed back to life. That's the reason why our unconscious invented them, not to help and "love" them! I want good people winning.

And vampires imagination is perfectly right to exist, I'm just against the concept of making them "lovely" things for the youth with PMBBD. Vampires are monsters, but the unconscious fear has been twisted to become something acceptable, a fear about the cause of our end, reflected by becoming a sexually associated things to get girls to wet their pants through PMBBD, to exploit what could develop as love by making it a competition and profit thing, and that's without talking about a panoply of other twisted effects. People who "love" or take the side of monsters become or are monsters, and as you know, it should be my responsibility as a good person to fight monsters, vampires and their gremlins too if they get in the way, they're just lucky to be in hell, where they found their place. Scary stuff must exist, monsters and beasts, we need those, they are imaginative enemies related to attitudes and signification, and we must destroy people who take the related attitude, whatever they are sexy, because that's the message; there are monsters feeding on people and they can be cute...It's just that there is always a better moment in life to appreciate monsters, or simulate, or live it. The worst forms of those are not meant to infect youth like party stuff, while you're building your mind.

No problem with "pure" ugly and disgusting monsters, those don't carry PMBBD, so they can be watched in youth whatever they are dripping blood and killing people at the ton, those are monsters and that's what we must teach children, fight monsters, they are bad thing, they even give nightmares. As the person gets older, you can make them more subtle or human, and once you're an adult you can watch movies with lovely monsters that are carrying so much PMBBD and twisted unconscious ideals you'd want to make "love" with them. Vampire movies should be watched over 18, unless you don't make them "lovely" things, but you can do nothing in this reality, the "super" "star" industry will cry over its loss of liberty because they make less profits. Children even start watching weird pornography around 10, a few years later they'll be dancing on "let's fuck", and parents are so powerless or in such a deep PMBBD stew that they see it as an epoch thing, or a justification go back religious to save their children. Soon this reality will be so low that children will have to self-censorship, they'll have to be more adult as adolescent than their parents. One thing's for sure, the future generations will have to "love" loads of monsters, forever more, and good innocent people will make them themselves. But you can create hype, make them cute and positive until everybody is in "love, and you can say you do it because people "love" it all you want, you'll still encourage a degrading attitude I hate in totality.

The screen industry is one of the main distributor of PMBBD, on par with religions, and they probably hide as many secrets. It manipulates so much that it simply cannot skip showing with evidence, whatever the wonderful façade they paint their messages with. But people are so superficial they don't even see evident racism in their movies, they'll eat it all happily, it's entertainment, it can't be bad! It's an artist! An untouchable entity! They got immunity! (except for murder) I guess it's because movie theaters make those actors godly giants; you're a little insect in their "life".

I shouldn't waste that much time on this, it's just that I don't see an amelioration, I see things worsening instead, whatever we're supposed to learn from the past, but the past can create a momentum to worsen things too, I've never been an amateur of learning from repeating mistakes until you're brainwashed to accept, or even become dependent, or minimally tolerate, adapt, everything's fine, who cares... I still like movies like everybody else, it's just that the way I developed makes me more sensitive to undermeanings and manipulations. I don't believe people absolutely need the industry sliding in money for quality entertainment either, which the industry, to defend itself, or unconsciously, justifies in its movies and songs. We don't need people living in luxury to have extraordinary things and entertainment, quite the contrary. In fact, their rich are a limitation to the industry itself, too many money hungry vampires, and you're lucky if they're not evil behind at it, or if it doesn't explode in the face of the paparasite industry that are scientifically proven to be naturally attracted to rich fumes, err, pheromones.

Popularity is a good thing, top actors and singers can be paid top salary, but popularity implies mass media which are out of control pub and hype machines here. And the fact remains that nobody is worth infinity, so your maximal worth is the maximal worth we can give a person, whatever your extraordinary job. I understand such a concept is beyond your intellect, it's the difference between you and me; you need a manipulator to drive your soul, I don't, I don't need laws or a religion or a government or a movie industry to dictate my comportment, I do it all by myself, from personally invented stuff, which will forever be more of a difficulty for the members of this reality. Why? Even those with advanced ego notions, or who don't like greed, don't see the fundamental interrelations; they would fight the right target, but they would fail to make things better because they couldn't find the time to understand deeply, and become a reflection, so the fundamentals would remain the same, particularly if they do things just following the wave, it's easy to revert back when you're not really convinced.

I had to invent many things to describe the fundamentals without conflict. As an example, I had to invent a notion (more like a principle) to describe the fundamental drive that led to this reality, the transformation of the pleasure system to the reward system, and when it is interrelated with everything, industry, economy, spirituality, philosophy, psychology, then I call it the ego gods ideology, but who does these things? Now, I won't explain the ideals or beliefs diversity fitting the category since by now you should have a very good idea of what I mean, I'm even sure most people with a good brain understood the meaning, relations and implications of ego gods ideology right away. It's no funky shit, people understand exactly what this is all about, even if some members of it will say the contrary... To explain its reality morphing force I then had to invent another fundamental notion "pressure selection" but who makes this stuff? Yet, I'm sure many people understood right away too, the rest caught on as they read. The final result had to be described as an independent thing, I called it "ego reality" to separate it from the result of another set of fundamentals; meaning if you grow your civilization on belief, or philosophies, or ideals, included in the fundamental ego gods ideology, your way of development will have its diversity limited fundamentally, you'll live in one form or another of ego reality, which when related to everything will have as an effect a tremendous increase in life failure potential. The next step is to invent the arguments for a contrary result, philosophy, monetarily, mentally, spiritually, the life gods ideology, you don't start a revolution without someone doing the brain work first, to know if it's justified and to expose possibilities. So you see the necessity of the word "reality" here, a different reality is incompatible, it is not an adaptation, it is not an extension, it is not a new curve; it is a new type of tree, it doesn't grow in the same soil, it doesn't bear the same fruit. Now, when you go that fundamental, you can see that there can't be 20 types of realities since a new reality is defined by a fundamental ideology (better related beliefs, philosophies, ideals). The only thing I can think of to be the seed of a fundamentally different way of life would be a "life reality", life related vision of things. The chapter Life Reality will be an example of a way of life that could arise from this, such a reality would give a different result versus another reality, and here it would lead to a tremendous increase in solar life's survival potential in the universe. Now, if you put ideals and beliefs at work in the wrong reality for it, you evidently end-up with conflicts, inefficiency, limited evolution, twisted evolution, etc. I hope you understand the extent of this, and the difficulty of creating a fundamental philosophy too, a non conflicting universal vision where ego, non-ego and altruism got a harmonic place. Some will say it is all logical or easy, but can you give me a book that will explain everything, even the universe, with some credibility, all the way to envision another reality? You didn't write one? I doubt someone ever did, I'm probably the first and only, if you remember in the indispensability part where I refuted the vision saying everybody is expendable and nobody alone changes the fate of humanity, while the truth is more like exactly the contrary... (Sure, nobody will change the fate of humanity if you persist to believe it should be like that while eliminating competition and making reality impossible to change...). 2/4

I'll change subject a bit to talk again about the lasting time value of things. Like true love, I'd like the washing machine I select to last a long time. It doesn't mean I see my girlfriend as a washing machine, but it could be a part of my history you know, and it wouldn't stop me from living an interesting story, I'd just appreciate going back to the comfort, security and reliability of my good old washing machine. But it doesn't work like that, I live in a reality where most people talk bullshit, make bullshit and consume bullshit (by the way, never traduce "bullshit" as "shit" in other languages, those are two very different things) all of it in the name of profiting. In a few years, I'll have to consume a television, a computer, a dishwasher, a car, a woman (those recycle themselves and are good until 35, but they still work hard after that), a washing machine, a dryer, an oven, a fridge, a bike, a barbecue and some furniture every 5-10 years.

That's what this reality strives for in the name of the economy, everybody will be able to embark in this wheel soon, the new standard of living, to keep yourself preoccupied... The reusability of a lot of stuff is already nil or more expensive to repair than to buy new ones (I tried to find used appliances lately and I had to buy ugly things dating back 80-90, I did not find a single item dating 2000 or higher (the environment friendly energy star bullshit) and the salesman rarely see them either so they are already decomposing and polluting the environment while you can easily find still working machines dating back 30 years!). I refuse to have 10-20 of those items produced for my short shift here, it's a ridiculous proposition I can't accept. Even if the planet is already full of people finding it normal, I refuse to be a part of this. I won't die having the goose bumps from visualizing the mountain of scrap my little person produced in its lifetime.

But nobody will worry about me affecting sale charts for sure, I'm too hard to satisfy, so stamp an "energy star", or "recyclable" logo on the product and make some pub with a scientist, a trees, a panda, and a few happy faces, to get as many people to buy as possible, production, growth, factories to bring jobs, manipulators and profiteers get rich, pyramids grow, pollution increases, hard garbage from short-lived production increases, and if it show then export it elsewhere on ships so we can keep our wonderful image, show some graphs about a lowering of pollution in the country competition, manipulate judgment, protect minds from the truth...

I'm sure a washing machines can easily last 25 years or more, and a slower rate of production changes nothing to technological advancement, more like the contrary, as more energy would be spent on lasting improvements, forcing higher quality items thus less garbage and production, but that wouldn't work in this reality, competition oblige. It's just a stupid washing machine anyways, not my girlfriend, it doesn't need a connection to the internet! The same for cars, did you ever calculate the size of the mountain of resources we need to extirpate from the earth to produce only a year's worth of cars, whatever recycling? No, nobody does that, too scary, you're not the kind of person to just imagine such things, but horror movies are nice, so you should have every tools to be resilient, to ignore such visions... The earth will have to deliver such a mountain every years just for cars and there are more and more, and the same for decomposing the garbage, and it's only 1/100 of the total quantity of hard garbage the planet has to decompose, out of sight, and a lot ends up in the oceans. And I'm skipping the military industry, military people are too good, we'd be nowhere without them, they gave us so much technological advancements (when the leadership of the country competition had to move their ass on research out of fear for their possession or system of exploitation)...It just doesn't work with me, their negative effects on the people and the planet are many and unbelievably fantastic, it's just mind-boggling.

Next is all this pub about saving water, it's always the lower of the pyramid that's responsible for things that go wrong, not the exemplary rich, while the higher you go the more trouble is caused and the less efforts are made. It's me that's wasting water, not their fountains, pools and vast gardens, it's me that recycle, not industrialists living fabulously rich lives with servants, in fact, people like me with principles are supposed to be there to clean their ass, and they'll pay a minimum salary for it! If they had used the surplus means they took to build structures that pollute less, with more environment friendly chemicals, we'd be in far less troubles. Take the most environment degrading industry in any city and make it environment friendly, this sole industry is almost worth the whole city recycling, saving water, saving power.

Sure they'd make less profit, but this reality is based on exponential growth so no way out of it; the more the rich gang profits grows, the more expensive they are, and the more they want and need (including investors and shareholders, logically), to sustain growth (for a minimal reason), until growth can grow more profits. It's simplified and incomplete, I won't repeat what I wrote previously, but you understand that the fundamental principle is totally wrong, and it is incredibly hard to steer it to a more global vision without ruining the power structure that is intrinsic to the bosses system, and you can bet the ones suffering for the changes are not the rich (or their replacement) or the medias related to them, even if the relation is only getting paid to pass their pub.

Do you see media people seriously getting worked-up about unfairness? No, because the bosses are among the unfairly rich, except for the ones who get caught the hand in the bag; they're sleeping in the same bed. Do you see the government doing it (giving the illusion or an example is PMBBD)? No, they are superior class too, most politicians are rich, when they're not corrupt. And big business are meant to be controlled by making the economy dependent from them, until they have tobacco industrials who do everything to sell cigarettes to young people as interdependent friends, and people are not better, in fact the money is mainly taken from lower people, just perfect, then if money is needed, it is taken with more austerity measures. The same for alcohol, and those products are no better in total for their negative health effects than any drugs, but they fit well with the reality, think about it...As for young people, they are the ones most drinking alcohol and taking drugs, and they are the main targets of publicists, and with the capacity of media people at creating superficial trends, then profiteers will always have a market to produce redundant garbage; we're not done with "new" shampoo and perfume formulations, the beauty industry has become a ridiculous joke that pollutes senselessly for practically nothing really new, like the clothing industry; everything that hides our ugliness or manipulate our image is an extraordinary source of exploitation and pollution.

For whom do you think people make war? Your wellbeing? When will we start calculating value of things in term of human or life value? Never? They'll spend millions for show-off, for their luxury holes, and they'll say the population not doing enough, robotizing everything, then moralizing people to get a job, while not knowing what is really valuable, except their ass! I just don't know what's stopping them from selling us the water like they do for the earth...don't forget that for profiteers, what cannot be sold is not supposed to exist...

As a sideline, it is not using water that pollute, it is the bottle around the water that pollutes it, it is pharmaceuticals that you piss and the industries that dump their expired stuff that pollute it, it is the army that dump chemicals in pits, it is bad nuclear reactors, chips plants overproduction, car and gadget overproduction, etc. If you flush a clean toilet, you don't pollute the water, and you don't empty the earth water supply either, in fact, the effect may be neutral since the cleaned water for human drinking is better than the water that is not these days. And I said "neutral" because of the energy spending to clean it. It's like saying the heat is killing the earth, it is not the heat that is the responsible, it is pollution, the responsible is human. And apart necessity, pollution is directly proportional to the money spent by people, as simple as that. And the problem is not only heavy pollution of water by people who only think of profits and absolutely not of the environment, like politicians polluting no end to talk about pollution, it is the rich who pollute like there is no tomorrow with their 3 big cars, boats, planes, and all the fantastic production needed to build all their expensive items and palaces, and keep their fantastically negative to others and to the planet standard of living. I'm sure that in my whole life to date I polluted less than a month of their life! And it is my fault if the planet gets polluted! I'm not making enough efforts! I should get a job cleaning pollution I'm not responsible for! My conscience tells me that if I want to truly do something good for the environment, I should trust this here ammo to do it by finding a rich's ass.

It's not people who live for fame or money who cares for the environment by personal conviction; they'll do it for manipulation, or as an investment, or out of fear. In fact, you'll have to manipulate them to get some pseudo-care out of them; you can get them to care if it gives them a good image as an example. So while we send a "super" "star" in space for a funny voyage so he come back with a consciousness, nobody talks of the necessary dirtying of water involved in the production of all what is necessary to send the show-off very intelligent rich clown manipulator there. But how can it be otherwise when people listen to his speeches on water while drinking bottled water? And if that's not enough pollution of water to make the bottle, they'll put it in recycling bin while transparent plastic is very hard and polluting to recycle, but don't worry, everything is gonna be allright, as long as there is a logo saying some scientist succeeded at recycling it. I'm sure less than 5 percent transparent bottles get recycled by industries, and I'm not talking about big bottles, these are more easily recycled, and you can use them to do other things, I'm talking about small bottles and little plastic garbage infestation everywhere.

The green revolution will be of big help to stabilize some facets of the environment for some time before they continue their degrading curve, but don't worry, it's not the industrialists producing those "green" items who will use them, and they won't lose a cent of profitability, they won't change their attitude or ways of living, they don't truly care about the environment, it's a matter of profiting from the consciousness of others. Even the "energy star" logo can be a manipulation; business use it to sell their stuff as better while it's the normal path of technology advancement, then you got big corporations that took possession of electricity production increasing their fees so people consume less so they can keep on making more profits every year while not having to spend on monstrously big and expensive structures. Either they build these structures or they increase the fees. They never seem to get enough money from the fees they're taking and investors to build these structures, so they are always closely associated with their governments even if they're crumbling under money wasted by their "evil behinds". They make as much or more money increasing fees than spending to build structures and when they build the structures it will be a fight to get them to build anything else than the cheaper, more environment destroying stuff. They'll even create shortages on purpose to increase the fees by manipulating megawatts; in many places, there is not even a power shortage, there is too much, but they'll still increase the fees. So while you have machines that consume less, the cost of electricity climbs every year (with an occasional break to keep an image of consistency). With machines that spend less, they keep their normal profits or increase it from selling new surplus; absolutely no environment consciousness here; it is governments that must force them, that must spend money for environmental project, but they're better giving them nuclear reactors. The result is most likely nil, less big power structures but more production to replace older tech, which would have been replaced anyway, but what I mean is that it's an economical thing, not a green thing, the green stuff is just a tool to manipulate people in the who's greener competition, which highly limit the extent of it. Consumers will buy green stuff as long as it's not more expensive than the normal stuff, and industrialists will produce them as long as people buy them, as for the energy star logo, it means nothing to me, just the normal path of technology, so the logo is an illusion, image, manipulation. In fact it would have come to that from pressures, like the consumer seeing it as an investment, less need to spend on power.

We are big producers of hydroelectricity in my place, we have just too much and we're continually adding more (I'm not necessarily saying it's a good thing). You'd think they'd be logical with their nationalist culture thing, but no; once our government succeeded at getting the nationalization of our electricity, and after a few decades of keeping the fees rate lower while making us proud of our hydro Quebec, making it a cultural trait, they started raising the fees with a goal of getting on par with any other place that don't produce electricity (if you compare to that other country, you'll see we are not paying as much! they are nationalist only when they can profit from it!). They now think so much of profits that they harass us with cute pubs to save power so they can sell it to the States more expensively, and to help along with that, newsmen continually compare us to the U.S. So they keep on increase the fees and someday we will pay the same price as them and they won't care to whom they'll sell it. They are so cheap they are even selling thermostats that start giving false readings of temperature after some use! The thing show 30 degrees and I'm freezing! To increase the fees they only have to make us believe they can't produce enough, they'll even create a limitation to make more profits, like they do with lodging, bandwidth and many more, why don't they go lament to the states to save power for Christmas instead of bugging us? But I guess they'll only stop when we'll pay as much as the U.S and their salary hit a million dollars or something.

If they truly wanted to do something for the environment, they would have started developing the electric circuit for small, well made and durable wind and solar devices, at a reasonable price. And they wouldn't make another industrious wheel of pollution in the name of maximum profitability by building cheap stuff or selling at the price of a car. And these are not the only kind of electricity producing devices that can be made available to people. Modify the circuit, (don't say it is impossible, liar) so power can be produced by people and sold to the government, or removed from their bill, then watch everybody buying and taking care of their devices while power corporations say they are ugly, but not their power-poles...Even if they do it I would not trust governments dependent from power corporations with the project, even giving the contract to an independent firm would be a bad idea in this environment, because bad intents will infiltrate one way or the other so it will work all wrong from hypocrite sabotage, the study in feasibility will prove it's not a good idea, or it would need constant expensive repair, or loose efficiency quickly, blow-up, while costing twice as much. It will not work because people would pay half, probably less, for power beside what they are paying right now, a big part of the dependency from power corporations would be eliminated and with the fantastic pay and many and extraordinary advantages the higher steps gave themselves, doing that would put their corporations in the red straight. Next you'll see them taking a poor businessman image and beg their government for money and getting it, it's time to save the poor business which made tons of profits in the past, but the gods of the company senseless standard of living and doing evil behind their façade, ate them and hid them all. There is no power shortage, only manipulators limiting our liberties for their luxury that they confound with happiness. They're doing exactly the same thing the lodging industry does; slowly creating a shortage on purpose to increase profitability, that's all, we can build lodging, we can have power. So lament as much as you want, I'm the one sweating in the summer and shivering in the winter, so I won't listen until you shut down Las Vegas as a proof that we're really in troubles. Besides, that city and many other have strictly no uses that make sense, they are fantastically destructive entertainment for rotten rich minds, that's all. Build things like that when you won't need to grow it on the back of innocence or the future, until then; draw them on computers.

As for cars consuming less fuel, those industrials are so out of their mind they want everybody to have a car or even 3, but a dozen would be better. And why do you think they're overloading the world in publicity? To sell less? To create less demand thus polluting less? How can they sell so many cars without emptying petroleum supply? Don't forget that petroleum is used for plastics, your beauty cream, paint, and many more. By doing exactly the same thing power corporations do; produce more crappy cars that consume less. They have to tough it out until we cover vast lands with productions of canola or soya or whatever else that can be transformed as fuel; we'll grow fuel all over the world instead of good food for people. We still have petroleum for 50 years! Like it's not an argument to change priorities...And that's at current rate of consumption, they don't talk about the 2% increase in demand every year, and the increased difficulty of getting it. No problem! You'll pay for it, since you got to keep the batch of rich at the top stashing and living in luxury, and you can't get rid of them since they made the whole earth dependent; you have to bow to their demands, unless you find nobody with the adequate attitude to be attracted to the position...

The car industry makes more profits by selling more and shittier cars (lasting 5-10 years instead of 10-20 years), and the petroleum industry makes more profit by increasing the price of gas (with an occasional break to keep an image of consistency). And I doubt that paying to dump old cars, all in all, have that much of a good effect on the environment, first you have to dump the cars creating pollution, then you have to build new ones exploiting more resources, while keeping power hungry production facilities running while they should be shutting down. But did I forget the "economy" somewhere? Damn, I wouldn't be a good president; you'd have to find someone that fit...

New cars do produce less carbon monoxide but is it the only source of pollution or what? I do believe they do all in all produce less pollution, without taking into consideration the shorter lifespan, but it's far less of an effect than their claims, which are always calculated on brand new cars by the way. Most of the benefits I see from doing this is for the car industry that will produce anew and sell more cars, keeping on with exponential growth pigolosophy like everything is infinite and consciousness is seen positively only as a source of profits; we still have petroleum for 50 years, infinity! Nothing to do with the environment, even if they have no choice to get in the green cake, like the security cake. Did you think the first belts in cars were installed to save people's lives? No way, they were installed as an investment, fear sells, but yes, more people is a bigger "economy".

It's a competition, someone got a fear and ego people will jump on it like vampires seeing a new profit source, they'll compete to profit from it, they'll even create or encourage fears to sell stuff! And that applies to people who see evil testosterone everywhere and need to make robots of people to protect them, they'll never change the reality, they'll always force people to adapt to it with straps, syringes and chips in the brain if they can, to protect them they'll say, but more to protect their selection I say. What I mean is that we should be careful of what we accept as "evolutions" from competitive and profiting corporations, they can bullshit masses into buying all kinds of hybridizing by inflating trends and fears that will increase extirpation of rare matters from the earth and create more secondary pollution from dumping more complex parts like short lived batteries instead of fuel tanks.

Now if you want to find a car company that really cares for the environment, resources, life and people, find one that make publicity pushing you to buy less cars. That's a bit contrary of the reason why you'd make a car company in this reality in the first place, for profits, not to make life better, but why don't they let people seek to buy a car from not imposed publicity? The "yellow internet pages of cars" doesn't generate enough profits? They plant publicity everywhere to brainwash people to absolutely need a car industry in their back garden like their life depends on it, doing it from 1 years old to the end of their life like they should not only be dependent from buying a car every few years, but from the pub too, until it's part of their culture. Stop the imposed pub to gain an iota of credibility with me, if not, all your arguments about how good and caring for the environment you are is a pile of PMBBD.

The more ego you are the less you care for the environment and the more you destroy it, generally speaking. I can smell them coming those industrialists, money stashers, politicians and the likes, with their PMBBD solution to everything, one will say there is enough place to grow their selected genetically modified "natural" fruits or cows to feed everybody, the other will say there is enough space to grow fuel and the next will say there is enough to grow plastics and the next will find enough to grow medication and none mention the other in their manipulative argumentation. More people are starving than ever while we dump imperfect fruits and milk to keep profitability at a maximum, some countries are chopping all their forests to make space for fuel plantation while the country besides plant a few acres in Kyoto's image so in the end they can say "this other country did less than me!" in the country competition. Now, find some spot where the air is better and where there is human resources, and build all those monstrous transformation industries to satisfy the needs you created with publicity and hype...

Do that while scientist appose green stickers all over and say in 20 years we'll live in an utopia full of robots and grow piles of food and gold with nano-machines, think about it, everybody will have a box of nano-machines since things are fair, and we will grow what we want with it! It makes total sense! I wonder how much energy we'll need to make all these nanobots work, because they seems to work from nothing the way they show it, if so I would strap those nanobots on little bicycles so they produce electricity...

Palace people all think that they're making the world better with their bullshit, but the way they made themselves indispensable to our wellbeing, you have to wonder if life is a big circus for them (well, maybe it is...) as a matter of fact, why aren't we all happy? Having a vast majority of people naturally happy is an illusion, an impossible dream? How is it possible that people are more depressive than ever, stuffed with psodologies for a kick, taking drugs and drinking alcohol all over, seeking sex and entertainment on big hype like it's the goal of their life, profiting from life, hardly able to live in couples a few years, more killings and depression than ever everywhere, etc, All that while it's a ruin to keep people under control, more police, more prisons, more cameras, more military, more PMBBD, is this what you mean when you say we live in the best system? It may be true for you, but it doesn't seem to be the case for many people, and you can manipulate medias with your means all you want, show the smile, fun and "love" facet as an emphasis all you want, it is still evident that most people are not happy, your best system doesn't even make its selection happy, it need to be forced or manipulated, until it's bizarre like a cult. Finally, if from the beginning of time all this work like crazy competitive philosophy is supposed to make our lives better, why aren't we living happiness? Why is the earth not a paradise? We can always work on projects for the rich to show-off, or show our greatness without comparatives, we can work like brain dead crazies until the end to make our tomb as vast and beautiful as possible you know... While our civilization crumble we will be working at building a marvel during the day and watching the death toll increase for supper, while Mr. president build himself a bunker on the moon so the democracy-capitalism business survives at all cost!

The separation between the inaccessible ego gods and hardworking people is becoming final accepted truth, and that will be particularly true when we find a cure for some cancer, or slow down aging meaningfully; those with the means will control these options and we will have to start a separate life expectation chart for them because of their stash of means, their family dynastic dreams and caste views of things, they got the best of everything and a bunker to survive anything. Things are already unfair almost to that extent, the difference in life expectancy between the rich and the poor is 10 years without taking worsening factors into consideration, and this unfair difference it is getting larger. They'll say they're just the first ones to profit from it (expensive cure), and that the price will eventually become low enough that it will be available to everybody, but this is PMBBD, this principle is very limited, doesn't applies to everything and is dependent from resources. It may work to some extent in a competition for profitability environment with accepted limiting rules that mostly limits creativity and produce fantastic amount of pollution, but it will take an impossibly long time to get a 10 000$ a year medication down at a reasonable price or produced at the tons at a cheap price, particularly with so much monopolies around that control knowledge for profitability. And that's without taking into consideration the situation of people like me, I can't even get a 25$ pack of antibiotics! I'm not worth that much, it's not important if I die, but you'll hear about it, planet wide preferably, if a rich dies. That's the same kind of crap that a tourist of space use to justify their ego show-off, 35 millions$ trip in space; they're just a tourists, they "love" too much the earth and life and someday it will be a 2500$ trip a lot of people can do, which is total bullshit. Besides, if everybody started making "love earth" trips in space the earth would be dry in one year. I say any tourist, or scientist with a semblant of experiment to perform, have absolutely no right to go in space, which includes schools sending stuff in space for fun experiments, they all should be stopped right away for the fantastic negative effect they have on earth, and their total misuse of consciousness I might add. I say you're very mentally twisted to be oblivious to the amount of pollution and exploitation you're responsible for to go in space to show your ass to the world, proving how much you "love" life. Maybe I'll have a different opinion in a thousand years, but that's it for now, particularly if the space tourist got himself rich by making entertainment I'll never have the money to attend to. Anyway, the ones getting happy in hell with jealous people all around are far from being good people, they are nagging evil people that should disappear, jealousy or envy doesn't exist for nothing, particularly when faced with injustice. What worsens things is expertise and science defending and justifying unfairness, the way many work for fame and money while glorifying their profession on TV, they'll end-up among the richest before long (a lots of them are already very rich).

I know I'm bad for defining "evil" in a manner that conflict with yours, you'll even tell me it doesn't exist with your army and police and law system, you have the liberty to use PMBBD to cheat life of its better path after all, take over the world until everybody thinks I have a problem for going crazy developing an opinion, people do what they want in liberty doesn't it, while those who had the best attitude to end-up with the means defined it on hype, I'm the jailer in your reality full of jails, I am the one that is inhuman as life lives the misery you impose by your system! No argument is valid? Nothing will make you reconsider? Then I have the right to the same extreme attitude, never put me in a position to select, because it will be instinctive, not even a little comprehension from my part, you'll have lost all potential to be understood, you'll have twisted everything, there will be no argument to protect your skin anymore, and I will fight for as long as there is any kind of hope left that good people can have a systematization free of manipulators and profiteers, I'll fight until the planet is done with this sickness. You think you can break life to your will, to have perfectly accepting workers, like people are an army to manipulate and break the character of so they defend your way to the end, but life will find a way to make you regret it, even if you made tremendous efforts to save yourself and survive the mess bought about by the mentalities and system you defend beyond any argumentation. Survive, recycle the planet for hell to be eternal, no choice, we got to survive, persevere, as I watch humanity's downfall and get myself justified. And the environment is one argument in the hell we made, I care about the future, which includes a healthy planet as part of my responsibility, so don't say I'm creating paranoia because I talked a little about climate change, which is one of the many after effects of inadequate mentality forming the leadership of this reality, why are you competing over it? You can do something to control a facet of the environment? Why is it not done then? Other priorities? All kind of other grave problems? Why wait when things seems critically risky and still compete? Why do you absolutely want to persevere when you know people can be made ready for an effort?

You took or stole or manipulated for the means, used the reward system to encourage your mentality, you brainwashed the whole history of humanity that money was meant to end in profiting and competitive manipulative hands, now do something good with it, you are responsible proportional to means, you will arrange what you did or it will be war, and not me, not the poor! It's easy to throw money once hell is done and money is worthless because the monetary system you invented to serve your gang was all manipulation, it's easy for the rich to leave their mess for servants or future generations to clean. For now it's all a matter of profiting, fighting risks and making the rules of their competition while defending their best system that brought them all they have. They'll continue making invincible in its path, until nobody, even them, will be able to stop it, their interdependent selection pushing forward, nothing will stop the monster, cataclysms, wars, famines, sickness, whatever, it will carry-on eating everything until the end. But don't worry, it will always need tons of pseudo happy dependent and well educated gremlins to do its work, so all its structures of existence will still exist, all what you have today, even "space exploration", will still be there almost to the end; you must have entertainment and new discoveries and positive news to carry-on...

The goal is to get the guy that beats the woman and the woman that tolerates it because she "loves" the guy scenario out of humanity toward the most ego people, people must dream of fucking with superior rich vampires and monsters like it's a privilege, that's the selection that have been made from the beginning. But sorry for you if I'm battling this kind of systematization; it is one of the most humanly degrading attitude people can have and it is one of the worst insult you can do to true love and life.

No will to fight for what matters most, nobody to lead in something different, the system is closed, make a sect or criticize. And I'm not talking about climate craziness here, it's hard to believe it isn't happening, I'm talking about the ego competition that caused climate instability; it will destroy everything and kill everybody, democracy-capitalism, superiority-inferiority, division, religions, climate change, out of control pollution, life extinction, all these are under-products of considering everything as a competition ground for profiting, the ego gods ideology where there can be only one winner in everything.

Who will fight? The youth I guess, innocence more related to candor, but it's all under influence these days, all the way to the predictable murderer, it's not like in the 60's, even if the path to do stupid and fuck brainlessly is still available easily, but even youth stupidity and prostitution has becomes an argument to embark more strongly later...And the most seriously motivated with good will, good pride, they embark more strongly than most, and there's a slab that end-up in the army, so it looks bleak to find fighters here. All is left is the poorer, when they cumulate enough frustration. But I'm pessimist, I think, or more like feel, that there's an army waiting for an opportunity, you think I wrote all that for nothing? I wrote it for a bunch of feeling, that's the extraordinary thing, it's all a matter of feeling a sadness in the heart of humanity, an hidden feeling of being condemned, a resolve to it. That's what I fight in big part, the acceptance, the denial, of what everybody knows, or feel, at a different extent, at different moments in their life, and I feel it's become critical, it is now that we do something about it. Me, I was just more sensitive, and I knew the ugly path it could lead me to, so in frankness I decided that as much as I'm an independent individual who is different, I could have been anybody, and let's say expressing the virulent and psychotic form it took in me has been quite a trauma. But I smile, whatever the unacceptable situations I put myself in, happiness is so simple, just accept that you're making a psychosis, everybody is supposed to make a psychosis, if you don't it's because you have a problem in the head, or you're missing new genetics, just control the thing, toward the beautiful.

People know younger and younger that they're being had whatever the path they take, but they got to live! And they are definitively not at an age to understand and change reality at the scale necessary, the most willing end-up as protesters or as researchers for the advancement of humanity or life, within the system, which doesn't bode well as they become interdependent. I guess they need an old retard like me, to kick them a little...You know the dynamics, I give you a job to do and you're all pissed off, and we exchange insults, something like that. The nicer part with me is that you'll understand because I don't take the stance of classic adulthood or old people who have stuff and mentalities to protect and reproduce. Evidently, there are priorities and philosophies, and the first one I'll kick is doing stupid for the sake of not caring, which may happen to be a sign of unconsciously understanding that reality is crap, but it's not an argument to perpetrate or worsen it...

Youth stupidities if so fun, it justifies anything, no regrets, it's like a star going extinct in the immensity of the universe, who cares? The ones who felt related to the star I guess, like me feeling related to earth life and humanity. Egotism is close related to stupidity don't you think? If you prefer, the stupidest people are the ones who don't respect, or care about, others or life, egotism proportional. The more you're self-centered, the more stupid you are, probably, and vice versa. Or is it the more intelligent, the less stupid, and the less self-centered? Something like that, if you see intelligence globally, not just as facets, and don't confound egotism with family survival. There are many stupid people who end-up making a family, and the fact that they act in a civil manner and take care of their family doesn't mean they're less of an egotistical person. In fact, if we follow the definition of a family, we can see it as a single entity, you're taking care of your family, your family, your possession. Nothing wrong there, it's a feature of human survival, but as I said, don't think spending energy for family and friends is what makes you altruistic or good, you're taking care of your own wellbeing, which we all do one way or another, it's just that for many their stupidity, or lack of intelligence or ego makes them do it in the worst way, at the expense of life's advancement or wellbeing. But what can I do when god decided that voting for the best manipulator around to run their intellectual laziness should be the only way to decide the path of humanity and life?

There's a mental problem here (?), related to pride, pride is super cool in theory, but when you defend wrongs to keep pride it's bad. The problem is that pride have become a reason for existence for many people, and competition is used to grow pride, so while there is justified pride, a lot is completely displaced. To the point that we may as well end-up living in a world of proud morons, run by morons, made by morons, (stupid egotistical (mentally challenged) people). And those proud morons will think they are intelligent and good as long as they have a master-slave system that can distribute pride as a competition. That's a bit simplistic as a bad way of seeing things, but well, I'll concede it's not entirely true...

I'm just trying to culpabilise those people who think life is a matter of getting a job and making babies without deciding if the system is good enough to invest their life in, you know, people can adapt to any existing leadership structure, becoming a condemnation, history is a proof of that. The line is thin though, while it is true that the reality manipulates people, that we're not supposed to pass our time questioning things that should have been questioned long ago, and that reality shows its ugly proportionally to age, that understanding can spread far beyond adulthood, at which point it should be time to reproduce, in a love scenario ideally, and more problems, the fact remains that people, minimally, should form an independent opinion of reality around them in youth, not just adapt, while doing stupidities for many, as a justification to invest themselves more strongly eventually, and they should not defend a system they don't like, or become criminals because the law is their only limitation, then feel bad, whatever it's because they feel cheated or the reality is not an example where it should be, or they lost hope...

What is very frustrating here is that people can always find excellent justifications, to skip doing what I do, but the most loser and condemning attitude is to make it harder for those who do, and the worst of all is to ignore or laugh at them, to continue business as usual, because it's there that the last stand is, to have a minimally functioning version of life's evolution. Someone who care can explain, be a source of motivation, of understanding, of leadership, for people who are incapacitated whatever from reality or from themselves, but this is like a last resort measure, and the price of not caring can be extraordinary. And this is the thing I'm not accepting, the reality of my life has shown hostility to my "intelligence", my life has been made extremely difficult because I decided to embark on an already difficult quest, and this is the last point, the proof that this reality is done, and the result should be far more violent than the still comprehensive approach I'm having, you think I'm too hard and it's not your fault? I'm super nice! I should crush you all!

Maybe I should feel bad for saying these things, but so what, you'll care? Yeah, you'll care only for what affect your self-esteem... I don't feel welcomed as a part of humanity, I should be distributing vengeance for this, for the dying life and its suffering too, my vengeance, well, my algorithms of vengeance, which should become quite developed and complex, to still be nice, tailored made for human egotism (stupidity), with a special for those who took the means, and I shouldn't forget the morons who act superior because they have a job or made a family (which is the most basic instinct of most life (The why so many people end-up making a family by accident), but a good refuge for insignificant people who need to feel important and responsible).

The ego innocent generally treated me like shit unless an advantage could be obtained, can be long term, or a superiority feeling. That's my premise for the next part. There are exception evidently, mainly some women who feel and fear and love and understand. And I know it's full of people with good intents, half people have a good initial attitude, and I can easily befriend them, as long as I don't criticize their style, but like everybody else they are in part responsible in making the reality; if nobody do something, if they are satisfied in the way things are, if they fear to lose their status, if no argument will get them out of their comfort zone, then I'll kick them, and sorry for me. Still, you don't have to feel concerned if you are not.

As for me, I've been doing my best to act in an adequate manner, while having my opinions, it does work out of tolerance or fear when the exchange is limited, like one person, but things quickly go sideways when too many people get interested in my mind, because they fall in a defensive or competitive pattern because they are already invested in reality. And fighting this reality on individual redundant grounds is unrealistic to say the least. To tell you the truth, today I very lightly talk about what's important to me, and my socialization is all the easier for it, the problem is that I don't enjoy it. What I enjoy is talking on my pillow, like I got a girlfriend, it doesn't mean I won't talk otherwise, but that will be mostly limited to standard stuff, or aspects of my thinking that are immediate versus reality, like if you ask me counsels, but I sure won't tell you to stop working or go fighting, been there done that...Now, if you absolutely can only build your mind from socialization and TV, then sorry for you, I wrote this book to show my deep self, and the truth of my opinions, enjoy me, or hate me, it was necessary, I wouldn't have survived doing it through socialization, or completely.

I guess that if I judge this reality then I should let it judge me, but no because I judge my experience at living in a reality that is real and I'm in part the result of philosophies and attitudes implanted unto innocence, but yes there's a big accidental part to this; I'm not really supposed to exist, and looking back I cannot say I was due to appear, or that I was predictable, even the antichrist is predictable because he is based on a facet of society, me I'm just hell's bad luck, in my most self-depreciating way of seeing myself, unless you prefer to see me like a hundred antichrist in one, one for each failed facet of this reality, not just Christianity, all assembled under the same banner. Or maybe I'm just a sensible person, it is necessary for my intelligence you know (insensible intelligence is material, broken life), and this reality is inadequate either for me, or to grow my kids in a manner I judge adequate, but put me in a good environment and I'll thrive, I'll make friends, but in hell I hate, even the innocent, they're the big deal...

I know what I didn't talk about; the paranoid attitude about any risk of change to society that doesn't pass by the rich's approval which greatly intensifies ego reality's desire to spy and intervene in the private life of its population of ego innocent who wouldn't care unless some well-paid expert twist itself a story to justify his pay or ways, or the ways of his boss. Who cares would be their short answer, at the same length as the profundity of their thinking...So the selection will probably laugh at me for as long as media people don't tell them my work is good. So what can I do? Laugh too?

That's why this reality revolts me so much, it puts an emphasis on costly people while making of the tool (TV) the biggest cultural trait possible, until most are made innocent of that by their lacks and the reality's ways. And sorry for me, I'm the problem, they're not, and the proof is that they're rich over the head, far more than me, and they are the ones people "love" most. But I'm still against unfair people, whatever they are innocent, everybody is innocent, even if some of them are full of good intents, and if you do nothing in the name of innocence, most of which is absolutely not, then you are condemned to innocence, and that is kind of a final condemnation.

And the selection won't get out of it because it can't do otherwise than encourage the system of their place they've been made to believe in with their life to the point of pissing on the head of anybody having another system in the back of his mind. And I'm not necessarily talking about me, I'm talking about all the necessary diversity this reality destroyed by its manipulations and pressures and emphasizes.

This reality you defend I hate it, and your stubborn attitude will cause life's extinction, and I like revenge, so the ego innocent (not kids) will not get away with full pardon as usual, no innocence privilege, he'll be treated as any other lifeform, and if you already fear or hate me, then those feelings will be exacerbated in the next part. At this point that's what's left; a throng of ego innocents who know better, and the only way to turn them around is to sprint through them...

As usual I'll throw the pot before the flower (inversed in hell, but I'm a good guy) so let's play in the defenses and justifications some people use to persist in wrong, to have an illusion of superiority, to compete, to control, to possess. It may happen that I'm incompetent, but you just had to respect life (don't confound with birthing, which is not necessarily good, particularly if you know in your head that your number is a problem to you or others)

So why would we be a species that just build cities to eat and fuck? Our responsibility is not to stay at the basics of survival but to go far beyond that, so far in fact, that we are the only lifeform we know in the solar system to be able to escape dust to dust (truly survive). We are failing the main reason of our existence, the simplest, by defending a reality that's inadequate for life, if we persist on rejecting or minimizing people who care for real (not to boast or to be part of a gang or to be cool, or because it's on TV or on facebook, or because you don't understand that it's not working hard that's important, it's working to help life that's important).

So be careful not to say "who cares" too often, it's a bad sign about your mental health, twice a month you should definitively consult before it's too late in your brain and you irreversibly become a mentally deficient system defender. The problem is that this reality needs morons with a high opinion of themselves, so the mass never revolts for the right reasons, to the point that it's an evident success; people who don't care better thrive while the more you care the more you are prone to show signs of mental problem, inverted roles, as it should be in hell, but to make hell's defense perfect, we'll use science that can encompass and defend all the bullshit hell's elite need to control life until its a failure (that's what evil does; fail life). Psychology, a science of the mind that has among the greatest influence on life, life is brains, and what's better for manipulators than to use the science to its own ends, a developing, super complex, and very relative science that should never be given total credibility, that should be used subjectively, and carefully; the effect of psychology on the evolution of life is among the most important and decisive. It should never be used to end up as a general trend meant to ostracize potential, particularly independence, it should never end-up corrupted by money or people with an agenda (like governments or researchers with a doubtful methodology omitting factors). But as it should be in this reality, a mentally healthy me is seen as having mental problems, while the really mentally twisted are seen as mentally healthy, as it should be... And if one of hell's gremlins ever catches one of my maladies, you can bet the fearful little social animal will immediately give "his" money to the psy, and handicap evolution in the process... Then, when he feels better and get some pride up, he won't miss an opportunity to be condescending with my potential type. I'm not sure that totally works, and there are worse idiots than the "who cares" type on atheism; did you ever meet the combination of ignorance, condescendence and ego innocence?

I am man that cares, and I "never" say "who cares" that's an insult to god, because the people I couldn't care less in this world compose something like half of the population, and instead of being a fucking loser, I decided to care, I decided I did not have the right not to care, and all those people I should be crushing I dedicated my life to them, because I could be any of them, I like to think, and I know people can change tremendously, you don't like my style? I'm trying to help you "the innocent" for me, for life, and I'm sorry but this format is what's needed. Either that or I don't care. So be careful around me, I'll spot all your shitty manipulations, all what you use to hide behind, all the evils you project on others, all the bullshit you defend to justify, what composes your pride, all what you aint got the brains to spot in yourself I'll see, inflate yourself in secret while thinking nobody notices the what you use your intelligence for, me too I'll observe while doing the innocent, until you find yourself in my writings...

But why, pray tell me why do I care? Because I don't want to be an innocent, I want to be responsible of my own failures and successes (you think your god will deresponsibilize you of your failures and grant you rewards for your successes? Yeah, do a few good prayers, and go back to your reality that you confound (without comparison) with a normal state for advanced life, reality that you have learned to defend and love. For now that's the best you'll get from me, I'd be more inclined to banish you to fall in an infinite pit, alone, where you'd finally find the time to reflect on your experience with life and innocence, use your brain for something else than adaptation or ego competition...

In the end, I die, you die, the difference is that I'll have tried to be a worthwhile investment for life, and you'll have been a bet, for your effect related to your job, which may as well be nothing much or worse if the end result is the advancement of the ego-gods ideology, for all the resources spent for your existence. That's the difference, you didn't care except to profit from life, I cared and acted to be a reflection of my deductions, I may be alone and poor, but I act in an altruistic fashion more than most by thinking of the future and work to make it adequate for all life, you act in an egotistical fashion, you trust others or the mass to make the future, you follow, when you don't destroy the sparks of change, and caring about the meaning of things or if you work for good or evil people is not your job, you assume evil is taken care of, or doesn't exist, only good, or you see it like the movie and media industry wants you, a classic mass produced atrophied brain inflated in superficial bullshit complexity. Your job is to adapt, work hard, then boast that you work hard, competition life, profit, and reproduce your attitude.

That was ugly, and it sounds like I'm so much better, that was narcissism right? Sorry, I just spent an absurd amount of time not doing what I'm supposed to do to skip becoming like you...That's the complexity of human responsibility, because losing innocence takes time, so you become older, where it falls on your shoulders to make the reality better, or at least try to prevent its members from twisting the ideals and good will of the youth. I should add that if you have nothing to lose, then not bringing yourself in contact with evil for battle it is a "sin" in itself.

A good reality will try to direct any "loose" innocence toward their ideal living scenario, unless you are an adept of the ego-god ideology, in which case you'd manipulate innocence right in the youth to become a source of profit or make a profiting system work. Evidently, in an evil society under a strong ego-god ideology, you have pyramidal structures everywhere on everything with a boss (god) controlling things, and those people work together to make a society that reflects their vision; here innocence is subtly controlled in a manner as to encourage it for the ego competition, the loss of innocence we see is educational for the role of fitting, defending and maintaining the system going, adaptation, the rest is competitive free for all with an emphasis on fucking as much as possible, so that people become full of shit and proud when they suddenly realize they can still think, but not outside the box without drugs...

I would say that if you see entropy as what define the bad you have to fight against, then entropy is evil. And so, logically, so is innocence, because total innocence is akin to nothingness, total lack of any form of intelligence or system, which entropy strives to accomplish, and you'll get the same result if you love innocence and seek to preserve it, and defend it and perpetuate it. That's the thing, because we all instinctively know that to grow or develop we must lose innocence mentally (mentally, not physically, physically to get the mental result, the more you lose innocence mentally, the more you develop your imagination, and that's contrary to what this reality is trying to accomplish by its manipulative autosuggestions for more sex that innocence is a sex thing and is lost physically, physical is always involved one way or the other, but the first thing to try is mental, except for morons, and keep it that way if more physical doesn't satisfy the mental, trying to adapt to a reality that you don't like instead of trying to change it to make it better (in your mind, not the one of others) is weak.

I'm pretentious and ignorant eh? I heard it a few times (both seems to come not far from each other in the mouth of the accusator, like pretentious people are necessarily ignorant...Maybe, but I never felt pretentious, in fact, I'm not pretentious and I think people can deduct why, or feel it. But it's different if you end-up jealous or frustrated from my visions on things that developed from not much social or books, maybe you're in denial, a true ignorant that is pushed by system bullshit to completely confound evident knowledge, even wisdom, with ignorance, quite a confusion, am I an ignorant? Self-inflated so superior to superman that introspection is impossible, ignorance can only be others, even when you know that you are wrong others are still wrong, and if you are not at your place, in god's chair, then you attack the ones that have the most potential at living ideals of love, or maybe you're so egotistical that you can't tolerate that someone else than you have my attention, or maybe you can't tolerate that my mind can transcend whole planets of the likes of your diversity, social circle intelligence dweller, if I wanted to be pretentious...

Constant happy media bullshit and doubtful adaptation psychology with heavy social fucking will do to brain limited people, act proud like he's big for having a job and a palmares of fucking, at some point reproduction will prove something, probably an old failure of some kind, then it's a matter of handicapping evolution by putting their dirtied paws on everything that someone like me need to thrive, until potential is lost, humanity reaped what those with the means sowed, self-inflated idiocy, and they're already saying "who cares". That was not nice, particularly if I believe a vast majority of people are born with as much brains as me, something must work very badly with the reality. I mean, you can't take me for an example, my youth can't be an example, I should be a retard, and I fail at thinking that I'm a retard that thinks he's into intelligence. Is it the selection process? Probably, with the adaptation procedures, socialization strategies, education emphasizes...I like fighting manipulators I think.

I seriously wonder if the most troubles I've had in my life came from the jealous and frustrated among the population, because that's the facet of society that deals with my type, or the facet of society I must deal with with my means, but it's more painful when you understand in advance and still have to be judged in completely weird ways from mainly bullshit based arguments. And so I decided it was time to stop this, either life continues to degenerate, or someone builds some kind of argumentation to put the ego innocent back in its place (in chains?), then educate him on the difference between being pretentious and being knowledgeable, between being a lamenting and bitching ignorant (or full of pseudo smart bullshit) sheep and someone who is able to project his convictions (gained from minimal bullshit knowledge) as leadership (leadership is not the same as licking asses...like politicians...)

And you reap what you sow, being nice and forgiving with the ego innocent has just let him slip in lazy ego thinking, and substeakequently greatly deteriorated many facets of life in big part to satisfy his escape in entertainment...And I'm not talking about his attitude with better minds; very prone to destructive jealousy...And why should I respect them? They never respected me unless I took their right attitude. And they'll bring life to failure if I do nothing and continue to respect how they do things and how they like living.

Why should I care so much about them anyway, they have crushed me all my life, acted condescending, insulted me with their own failings, tried to culpabilize and demonize me for my ideas, attacked my reputation for fun, dragged me to court for unbelievably candid actions (see it as the pardonable form of innocence, making mistakes because you really care...), beaten me on the head, ignored me, tried to destroy me psychologically, and now they would be too happy if I pitied them as innocents, or better fell on my knees and begged for whatever...They are lucky I decided to have the decency to be acceptably nice with them all through my writings...Instead I'll call much of this as "hostility by interposed persons" (the system). So the innocent is a manipulated vessel meant to protect a way of things from people like me, the worst fear of evil. It is a war when all what it implies is taken into consideration, the war of good vs evil, and while evil had history to build hell, me I have the universe and life to back my strike, the only strike necessary, the only choice now is either surrender and start building a good reality, or earth life goes kaboom! So there is no bad feelings about it, I'm justified over and out to destroy any dog that is an obstacle in any way to the progression of the life ideal, ok?

Sorry if I'm not hypocrite, I declare war openly, and I'm just not as manipulative, I declare war for logical and evident reasons, as for jealousy, I guess we're jealous of what each other have, and sure I've got tons of lacks, but your ways, your attitude, not my type, at the opposite of desire, but I'd drive a car again someday, maybe not in this reality...So the war for most people is made of tons of unconscious hypocrite and jealous little hurting actions, as vessels of the ideal they want and invest their life in, but the result is the same, the difference is that I don't fight because I'm an asshole, my life would be far simpler, I fight because I understand. That's the worse part, so I act consciously from deductive logic even though I feel for people tremendously, but wars are hard on feelings, so sorry if I hurt yours, and sorry if your bullshit fails on me, I'm the resisting bit, and if you don't fight this reality one way or another (you don't have to drop your job for that...), or only think entertainment and babbling, then the minimum is that you shouldn't be worthy of my attention, no sorry if you get crushed, or if I crush your feelings. But I'm a gentleman, and I believe social and dancing and babbling is supposed to be a good thing, so I give you social peace time, and I'm not alone, I have consciousness of other people, so I deal my attitude, and I like nice, so I do nice, and I know people in this reality are supposed to be happier if they stay innocent of many things, it's just that I fought it in me, and I successfully kept some candor and youth in me, and I know people make mistakes, and I know people are young, it's just that these justifications can be enumerated by a 12 years old these days, they have become cheap excuses to defend and continue wrongs. Maybe it's because many fear to have been so wrong that their whole life is built on the momentum of wrongs, to the point that putting it in question would amount to the crashing of their whole personality, then having to live under the scrutiny and judgment of those they invested a life of emotions with. But I understand, reality condemnations are the most difficult things to fight, then there is a minimally comfortable standard of living that any healthy human should strive to get as a normal priority (Yes, but you should mainly feel uncomfortable in hell...If you feel comfortable, then you are too well adapted and you found your place...), then there is socialization that no sane person should live without, etc, etc, all kind of very important things that this reality condemned to its grip to push you forever more in the wanted direction. Myself I have to bow to many systems to survive, so let's say being condemned minimizes many facets of evil... but never near elimination, you have to fight evil true, do truly good things, only then you'll get a positive emotion from me, ego innocents dying of suffering compose the collateral ablation path of my fight against bigger enemies, at least when I want a good sleep...

A lot of people will go through youth cumulating as much "innocence" justification as possible, through life trying to have fun and bullshit others in the competition. Me? I understand and I endorse the concept, but I fail a lot at having fun in this reality, fun has become like after responsibility, and my youth was hell tanks to the ego innocent. So why should I feel bad explaining their problem? Why should I not demonize them for their irresponsible behavior? Why don't I go back before I started all this, to think how my life would be different...For now my neighbors, they don't care, the war was won long ago, it's natural prevention time, so they party, they fuck, they have fun, they enjoy life as much as they can, they ask for more money, they fear the rain a little, and they reproduce like rabbits. So things are fine enough and I'm jealous, yes I am, I feel stolen, I feel disrespected, and this chasm, this ocean of distance between the enjoyment of the ego innocent and my experience as someone who really care, is a big source of frustration for me, and it should be. So the innocent is causing me disrespect in an indirect manner. At least, contrarily to me, they know how to fuck, they find opposite sexes like them aplenty, and when they get a baby, they do their best, they become "good", well adapted, they get their shit together and become full contribute... But how can I blame innocence for not having judgment and just imprint itself a pre-determined social schema, one where people like me are better imprisoned? (I am, at cheaper cost...).

Just be careful doing the freshly illuminated innocent, I trust nobody, prove that you are no bullshit, prove that you care for life (not by patting a pet when you feel like it! Or making a baby). I'm too much? What do you expect? I'm alone, I don't have a governmental institution to back me up, I don't have apostles, so you'll get it pure! 100% me myself and I! Just don't try to confound people into thinking that I'm an ego person as soon as I say "me" to describe what such a person as a "me" would do. The reality is that the amount of what I took for myself while living until now is not much, as for my negative impact on people, it remains to be seen, but I like to have a big negative impact on evil...Anyway, a good person will enjoy pleasures that reach profound in the mind (soul forming) without conflict is the way I see it. I know many people can't understand, but to me the ability to feel without a conflicting mind is more precious than any competitive PMBBD because it's there that one can witness the invincible pull and force of evolution. The ego innocent with its mind built around all kind of weird PMBBD ego manifestations is ill placed to moralize about how others perform in the ego domain of things...

That applies to all those who had a condescending attitude because I didn't fit their definition of success or arrange my life in a way as to satisfy their ego hierarchy, like that old "friend" I hadn't talked to in 10 years, and his first sentence was "Hi my friend, come see me when you pull your shit together (put some order in your life)", fuck you is what I say, my life is ordered far more that I would want if I was not fighting, I pulled my shit together as soon as I became an adult, you are the one that never reached adulthood, you don't have an order, you follow an order and use it like you represent it, that's different, not necessarily wrong if good, but surely not an argument to act condescending, particularly when you work for a life destroying system. So fuck you and your mental disorder of an ordered life, a facade to hide how fearful you have become...And why should a fucking farmer tell me to put order in my life? Defend your reality all you want, think you're superior because you confound adaptation and working hard or raising a family with good, I fight for a different reality, and I take my responsibility to the extent permitted by your reality without dying automatically, I'm proud of the order in my mind, you're proud of your order in hell, let's not compare too much, ok? I could end-up writing far more virulently, stuff you wouldn't dare to read, as you coward within your social competition conventions of who's better than the other...

Sorry, I want to be a farmer too, a small farmer with a nice family, and trees and flowers, I'm not jealous, but thinking about that makes me sad. One thing's for sure, I have a hard time tolerating condescendence (and pride in this reality), once, and you're done, so make very sure you're in the know before acting like you're better...Now I hope you understand how I feel when an innocent becomes frustrated because I say I don't want a job, then start acting big adult, failing to understand that working is not synonym of good, that all criminals and evil people, including their innocents followers and dreamers, they all have a job to do to make hell work perfectly, and they all have a justification, or a pass for paradise, they think...yeah, like me they think I'm the evil one, woops, like me in the devil they think I am, what the hell, I should get a job to stop being evil (get my shit together), they say, at their reunions...Ooh I see them coming on the defensive now, "we have to make a living! We have to live! We have to make a baby! I know, it's a historical momentum of failures dictating the final form of humanity, or more like the form of its final failure. Too bad ancestors bent and started licking asses instead of standing and fighting; selling your soul to the devil is easier, believing in the easiest path is easier, in a sense humanity is not good enough, and it proved it historically at repetition by failing to stand against injustice or evil, preferring deceptive illusions and manipulated emotions. After some pressure humans abandon and become slaves, and there is no place for slaves among the best of the universe, slaves die and disappear for their failure to fight evil. But these things are beyond the need of current people's comprehension, like a lot of what I write I suppose, it's just a facet of an incredibly complex machine that should be simple but have been made impossible to reveal adequately in the hell that was subsequently created to make it so. I'm just explaining what should have been understood thousands of years ago, and now there is too much bullshit over it.

Never project your failed mentality on me, and prepare for a backlash if you disrespect me, an eye for an eye, or vengeance, particularly if I feel your insignificance behind your disrespect. I disrespect you because you disrespected me, all of you who want to believe I'm having a persecution problem when I talk about the attitude of "some" people because I lived the situation, some, not all, circumstantial evidence. Sorry if I gained the ability to finally make a riposte. Put the hat if it fits, remember? I got tons of disrespect for twisted reasons in my life, not for reasons I consider good after thinking about it, and I try to think frankly. And while I don't like systemic punishing and executions and torture, I'm all in for vengeance, so all of you who disrespected me with the bullshit in your head, you gave me the right to disrespect everybody with your attitude if I'm to select myself in... You failed to prove me you had the right attitude, or that you were better, you should be the one getting crushed, particularly if you have become a big important adult who feel the need to act condescending.

I'm not an amateur of those who self-inflate because they know someone they feel superior to, that's in part how mediocrity works, but it's far more complex than that, particularly in this reality, where any feeling can be used to manipulate people's judgment. Under the hood of altruism the most egotistical actions are perpetrated, the same apply to any "noble" goal (not like in nobility, there's nothing noble there, in fact, it is a contortion to manipulate people into believing that the biggest criminals are actually better than good, they dwell in the noble stuff and do philanthropy... But you reap what you sow, by twisting noble to become nobility to defend evil, you waste nobility as a good principle, not much of a loss but still; I'd like to use the term without feeling the media publicized pressure that you got a stick up your ass if you don't dance. And don't forget, the manipulator dances because it is his job to make the innocent dance like a moron. The elite who want the innocents to dance, they don't dance, well, maybe a cha, cha, cha once in a while, but who wouldn't do a cha, cha, cha...And nothing against dancing btw, I like it, I want to dance, trance dance too, but not as a pressure or to prove I aint got a broom up my ass...

Sorry for you if you didn't form an adequate opinion of what's important, the information was there, you just preferred to do something else than develop your brain adequately, making more like yourself probably, more innocent that you'll gladly manipulate into becoming a success like you. Now, why should I leave the world in the hands of people I don't like? Ah, I know, to verify that your vision of life is indeed wrong, when there is one... I guess we didn't reproduce the people who could fight for a better vision, systematically, we twisted their potential and we reproduced those we could fill with manipulative bullshit, they make bigger families, and morons, those happen accidentally, from tons of missing judgment...Hype, and push, and manipulate, and adapt, until they defend their unhappiness as something normal, as a feeling of superiority even, a twisted responsibility, hard work to inflate themselves no end, drooling in their pride, an inch from murder in their repressed frustrations. There is no argument, they'll need to verify if they are right or not by causing the extinction of humanity, nothing will make them reconsider the reality they invested their life in. I'm sinking deep in my generalizations here, but there's definitively a big slab of the population that will only reconsider their path if god descend from the sky (or his equivalent, a politician, maybe a super star, or glitter), if you read between the lines of their attitude. So they'll need to verify that they are good, with a pope or some guru preferably, and they'll only stop once everybody is dead, only then they'll finally consider that they shouldn't have been so sure, or disrespectful, or condescending. At least I'll have written my vision, to put it in the hands of life, it's my gift, a different opinion, a different vision.

Go ahead, forge on, when things are going bad just keep on working hard, and let me rage at what you're doing with the world, continue the selection, now that you "reproduced" backups as an argument to force the whole of it to your weaknesses, that you'll even defend with cheap innocence arguments and numbers, now that you have the whole world in your competition, now that you are sufficiently confident that you think no alternative is possible, do go ahead, bring me with you in death! What can I do? Become the soul of life I guess, if the whole of humanity can't heed sense no more, if I'm powerless, incapacitated in advance whatever the effort, then I'm left with the only wish that I'm wrong, because whatever the difficulty, the whole of life is the most wonderful creation, the resulting human particularly.

For now I have a good start at elaborating who or what is good or evil, in case life needs some microbial or virulent algorithms of clean-up...That's it, I should prepare for the few possible after death scenarios that fit my style...I hope life likes me, as I ended-up alone in a humanity that I always considered a part of me. I could say we parted when I became a loner, long ago, when I took the path of life, and understood humanity had taken the path of its destruction; sorry for the misunderstanding, it's fundamental choosing side stuff in actual action. But what is the truth of suffering? What is left if I free myself from reality's schema of suffering? Loneliness, true loneliness, when every new bit of understanding is a weight of misunderstanding, cumulating. Then there is ego versus the path you have chosen, beyond yourself is life, sacrifice proportional to humanity, and there you are imprisoned, and you can't escape, it's a matter of responsibility, of life and death. As your body wants to sink within the earth, your mind wants to fly in the sky, so you have to walk an intangible line, holding powers for equilibrium, as you are pushed around by possibilities. All just there, the power, but for now it's just a lesson about how much you care, until your only comfort is the right to be wrong.

I'll do what I can within a single incantation, hell don't scare me, hell is the result of cultivated (with PMBBD) innocence, and I've been through it as an earthling, and I won out because I formed my mind as I should, I didn't just adapt, tried to compete to find a place, profit from life. I fought for life, I didn't fight to fit in hell...But that's just me, for many people this reality is their paradise... These are just fantasies evidently, this whole book, my whole life, is a fantasy, and I pay my life for it. Invent yours, invest in yours, my imagination is having fun within the parameters of my beliefs, you are very far from my kind of bad trip, but you have PMBBD...No more profiting from those who strive to make life truly better, by manipulating their feelings to the point of forcing them to defend your wrongs, or your ego innocence. Never disrespect intelligence by forcing it to live a perversion of truth.

I'll still give a kick before too late, then good riddance, it could have been glorious if we didn't select PMBBD as our most important learning tool, if we weren't so upside down wrong about our view of good and evil, so proud for the wrong reasons, so blind in our beliefs, so incompetent in our logic, so inept in our care for life, that we actually needed to bring the whole planet, the whole of it because we found no place on it to experience something else, the whole planet to extinction, just so we can say "we were wrong, we should have left some space to try something truly different".

Carry on, but if I can, as a human with its pride and emotions at their right place, I'll make you pay for bringing me along with you in death, no scratching my head, my mind will flow, my work with it, and I'll forever be with life as humanity too, a creation beyond my imagination. The skills you better encouraged, they were not part of my priorities, and you forced me to nothingness while your attitude is leading life to failure (if you stay stuck and end-up in a black hole, you were nothing, you had it very wrong, evil, entropy...), or you're not good enough for survival if you prefer (what's the point of evil here if you are sufficiently incompetent to die when you have every tools to live? Or when you make a good hearted person feel bad or useless for trying to explain why and how? To care?).

Well, that sounded like fatalism a bit, but our effect on life incredibly more negative than positive, to the point that we are destroying billions years of work by life. Ultimate deception, we are not a good species to have around, and the contrary of good is evil, evil in the amount of wasted life transformation used for our existence, the possibility for solar life to escape dust to dust. Maybe you didn't know what you were doing when you had Jesus, but you can't expect to survive forever not knowing what you're doing (while you develop condemnations and laws proving you know exactly what you're doing), particularly when life and the planet is on the verge of disaster. Don't forget pardon is not only futile, pardon is dangerous when innocence is cultivated, but yeah, I pardon you because you're a bunch of innocents, but I won't give a shit if you utterly crap in your pants in front of the truth, that's the deal. All the information is available, my work is available, I could develop my soul in a life caring way even if I started in more troubles than most, so innocence is not an argument anymore, a wrong mentality is, and if humanity is handicapped intellectually, then embrace your end, it's better than becoming slave to evil.
Jesus pardoned innocents because he thought they would get out of it, ok? But I'm not Jesus, and the people are deeper in it, and I have to deal with far more problems at a far more complex epoch than for Jesus. The reason for pardoning innocence is to end the innocence situation, so your Jesus in fact gave you an ultimatum, because you can't pardon the same mistake over and over again without losing credibility or leadership. So you can see your Jesus as a warning, the end of innocence, he pardoned the innocents, but what do you pardon in the first place? A SIN so your Jesus saw innocence as a sin that was worth pardoning in his time. Today things are different, maybe I can have a weakness for those who make adequate efforts to understand the truth of the reality they live in, but presently people don't have much valid justification for innocence pardon except being a kid (harsh upbringing? slavery? Illiteracy? A 3 days walk? Lack of time? Fuck you, you have time aplenty to work, fuck, watch TV...), and the problem here is that those ego innocents are a tremendous mass of evil for not much good, so much in fact that species go extinct all around them and they care so much they see entertainment as a priority and throw a party, they always throw a party. Losers do what they will, me I'll be on the side of life to the end, and if no argument can work to make people take their most fundamental responsibility, the thriving of life and its battle with entropy (no, nothing to do with making a baby...), then they'll all be my enemy, whatever they'll be billions to die, whatever they embark as much innocence as they can to protect evil.

The other difference with Jesus time is that people know far more wrongs, people know wrong all over the place, but they continue for the sake of feeling like they're doing something, they don't fight evil at all no more because there's a risk and it's none of their business. Or is it that they never sufficiently cared to define it logically by themselves? Didn't have time? They've been incapacitated from doing it? They never truly believed because it all start at life, what is everywhere around them, they immediately embarked in a god competition with incompetence from their power over what is evident from life. The problem for the innocent is that high consciousness life (me on this earth) shouldn't care less, we know that each sun is a new chance for life, that there are many who have the ability to succeed, but still it hurts, it hurts my ego envelope on this earth, because I know humans have everything to succeed, and then some.

So your innocence is not all the fault of fate, you always knew you could manipulate others, from 10 years old, and as adults you knew you were being manipulated by media people, pub, governments, religion, you embarked in the competition of manipulation, I debarked, there's the difference, you try to enjoy the reality as a part of it, you work to make it stronger, its negative quirks are acceptable to you, me it's the contrary. So now you are sufficiently manipulative to suppose that by saying the magic word "innocence" we suddenly, although we have dilaterally opposed attitudes and effects on reality, we should be seen as the same? You can do anything and in the name of innocence, be erased of it all, and laugh at me? That's why I tend to say "ego innocence"; because we lose innocence for totally different reasons. In my world there is no ego innocence, the pardon and innocence stuff your bosses invented was just meant for you to not feel bad for defending, doing or being evil.

What I know is that innocence is the biggest loser argument ever invented, the most exploited justification for most of the evil of this world. Innocence goes hand in hand with evil is what I say (easy to manipulate with graphic effects, confound intelligence with words manipulation skills, high bullshit reinforcement potential, unconscious bottleneck from conflicting bullshit, escape through family creation and pride gained from becoming a reflection and defender of political-nationalism ideals, willful enslavement from misplaced pride, contorted good vs evil view to defend egotistical investment. I hope that's enough to make you understand that innocence is no argument with me, because in the face of a failing humanity, then innocence will become the ultimate argument for more suffering.

Nobody likes to feel he's been wrong all his life, particularly when the affirmation is totally not on TV or internet! They could fall in denial from being scared of someone with no cultural brainwash attacking and invalidating whole slabs of their good philosophy of life...So they hold themselves together. Some may feel like knowledgeable innocents because their unconscious knows I'm mostly right and they're not supposed to act innocent about what I say at their age. They may try to justify themselves and try to dehumanize me at the same time by saying "I'm just human", or worse, try to infantilize me by saying "grow-up", like that farmer that told me to get my shit together...

Still, I can say I'm too hard with people who work hard all their life while believing they do good, it's a big part due to good intents, where innocence is understandable, but there's another basic drive that remains true under a lot of my revolt too, and that drive is the will to act; you absolutely don't want people wasting half their life writing like me, people who act and build things with great efficiency giving their time to do things well are a treasure to cherish, those are all the active good willed people, from the janitor, to experts, specialists, scientists, doing things with good intents, not for infinite profits.

Everybody deals its innocence, an eternity is not enough to lose it all, that's why people need a simpler basis of life where their innocence is not manipulated or exploited by other ego factions that have lost much innocence in "profiting from others" areas. That way people can choose the complexity avenues they want, and if they want to stay innocent in other facets, nobody will make their life a hell of contortions to profit from it, creating unnecessary exploitation and pollution, mind twisting and sicknesses, with an assortment of displaced bad feelings. Such a basis is there for fundamental fairness, for everybody to have a chance with all the tools created by our ancestors, knowledge, comfort, and some aspects of entertainment, to say how civilization sees good goals, and the minimum attitude you must take to be part of it, and decide with it.

I believe the potential to make a good reality is still great, even if most truly good things and actions have been manipulated and frustrated to lose most of their positive value or properties. Pity, compassion, understanding and more, I'm not stupid enough to believe these are infinite or made only to be used personally as band aids. These have been taken from me, twisted, thrown in the lake with laughing contempt to run down people like me over and out, and this book is my last stand.

Apart working hard there is the baby making industry that I removed from "I'm good" argument, but I know it's a big challenge, particularly in this reality, and it's the ultimate success of love to do it in happiness, where you can end-up justified to boast proudly, I want a baby too. Concerning the innocence aspect, I know most parents got a normal protecting attitude with innocence, but there's a lot of love innocence a bit too much is what I say, I don't know, maybe it's because they feel kids justify their own failings, they compare themselves to their kids and feel better, they want to "preserve their innocence", they see babies and they all go soft, because they are so innocent and "cute". Personally, it's adults first, babies last, unless you're dependent from a baby to feel good, which I can understand to some extent, assholes like me are last, too. I'm not talking about the human connection here, I'm talking about value. Maybe it's just me, but I find adults far more interesting than babies or kids, I can judge and sentence adults, babies less so, but it's just me...Joke apart, you make children so they lose their innocence to grow big and adult, independent, not better than you, not the same, not worse.

From time immemorial we exploited, bullshitted, manipulated and controlled more innocent than ourselves, we have to stop this; profiting from people's weaknesses or different mind emphasizes to manipulate them, limiting knowledge availability for profits, ego competition mentality. Nationalism, democracy, religions and sects are a few such structural lies permiting such a systematization of unfairness and mind pedophilia; the growing of ones ego on the back of cultivated innocence from PMBBD. Whatever the way it is done, whatever the man know itself to be or not, however thick and many the layers it is hidden under, it will always be a crime. If you try to justify it by saying you didn't see things this way or didn't think about that, then there is someone that will tell you that your human adult responsibility is not to work your brain out, but to ask such questions and individually take the time to find answers that make sense. But individuality is bad, got to follow the gang that follow the politician, don't think by yourself, it's bad, listen to authority, do your job and have fun.

And sorry if I'm not a representative of success to reap in the admiration in this reality, but I believe I'm the only type of personality that can do my part of the job. I'm the result of jealousy, competition and hate, that's socialization for me and the rare exceptions I can really call useful friends amounts to almost nothing versus all the bad vibe. And I'm not putting all the fault on others, it's my problem, that's just how it is when you're alien (I'm not talking about those who like my social demeanor (gait), and those who have the perception to feel my heart or my battles, but not the ability to express it in a manner that makes me feel confident in digging past the initial "feeling" exchange. Then there's the fact that the best way to scare me is to look at me like I'm Elvis. My social interactions do seems better as I grow older, but maybe it's just me that is adapting to the responsibility I have taken and that is beginning to exteriorize through a transformation of my attitude. Because, well, it's the law of the blood, something hard to explain but that I always understood unconsciously, something like saying that if you take the means to be a pariah, don't complain if you become one... Yeah, but I'm not always in a mood to say everything is my fault, particularly when the contrary can be true too, so it's all a matter of arguments...Nothing is my fault, why should I have responsibility in anything? I complain about me and the world population proportional! There! With this argument I'm not gonna complain much about myself... But that's not how it works, so let's just say that whatever you think, I'm very critical about myself, and unless you're a manipulator with an agenda, you'll notice that the question of my own interrelations within the subjects of my preoccupations will always (never say always) pass by a study of my own psychology.

It doesn't mean I'm different, I made myself different, that's the difference, because I was living a life being pissed-off, deceived, frustrated, revolted. Most of the arguments, however ugly, even when I demonize, are meant to have a way for my judgment on things to fit, but I'm no better than most people, I like luxury too, pretty things, entertainment, I could even be a pervert, who knows! But I prefer love. I don't think competition is evil, it's an excellent drive, but its exaggeration is bad from what I understand, manipulation is intrinsic to the way our mind work, I'm a manipulator, but there are other principles that make it so I must try to be frank, as much with myself as with my judgment, and manipulation is bad on judgment. I'm an ego person too, the first person I'm supposed to take care of as a priority is me, there are tons of things I want to enjoy, and I want to share with the people I most appreciate first, but I don't want to do it if it removes the potential in others to develop and live adequately. It's just that from my understanding of life, how it morph, I got a job to do and this job involves striving for ideals that make sense to me, while having priorities, I can think of all these things and I'm proud of that. So I'll stand for humanity to the end, even if you reject me, because I am human. Still, if there's a chance, a possibility that my vision becomes reality, I'll take it, and I'll fight those people, with weapons, pressures, demonization, who fit my definition of evil, like this reality did, and I'll do at whatever extent necessary. You think that what I write is too much? It's nothing, an infinite fraction of what this reality did as death, pressure, selection, and manipulation to attain its vision.

At least there won't be the chosen one stuff, I chose myself, and nobody in my life ever suspected I'd "get my shit together and do something with my life", because that's exactly what I did, what I did with my life is getting my shit together more successfully than 99% of the population, reflected in my writings as a reflection of all the puzzle pieces my mind continually produces. All those people who insulted me or who had been cheap with me, I bet they'll act differently if I just become popular... I hate this, this is so low, at least I have many defenses and justifications and logics to act the way I do, but I could say this is a facet of what separates the winner from the loser, even if the loser always win in the end in hell... I prefer to see it as what separates someone with a soul from someone without one, and a lot got to do with the mental construction you get from reality as you grow (mainly what kind of independence of action and thinking the reality pushes you to have, depending in its ability to deal with "prison" (feeling of loneliness) symptoms with alcohol and drugs or fast food or "love"; it will make you feel a little evil in its evil view of evil, you'll feel bad and then compensate by being good in something socially acceptable, becoming more of a slave (a tool if it hurts your susceptibility too much...), probably ready to work hard and make a baby! And the price of the pride is paid by those who didn't, like them, "get their shit together"... but still, I won't justify innocence when my style is never given a try.

Don't wonder why there are no good leaders arising from the population, my situation is that as soon as I try to express my feelings with some intensity, I end-up in front of a judge. If the place you give me is shut up or get a job that is in conflict with my beliefs, then I'll choose the path that is the less costly in evil, which is to close my mouth and interact at a minimum with those who contribute to my frustration or revolt. It mean that if the reality of people see me differently than what I am, or if they think I should do as they think instead of what I personally think, then I will think they are as right as they are wrong, I may be wrong, but I believe I'm right, but the masses prevail over my personal opinion, because that's the form humanity took and that's the reality they accepted to make and are working to reinforce to this day. But I will never be a slave and that's why I'll be counterproductive toward a reality that I believe doomed, and if people accuse me of it, then I'll just live my minimal right of survival and I'll cope with the frustration, or rage or revolt or desire for vengeance alone.

Why do I see things like that? It's because I'm way beyond the state of having something to prove, you arrange your reality to permit people like me to be what they invested their life to become, or too bad, you will miss that facet of life, which may be necessary for survival btw, but it's not me that decides...One thing's for sure, I'm no competition. How or why should I do all that to fight a wrong way if people don't want or act contrarily to what's needed? And I've never been a believer in forced punishing, even if I do like vengeance, so I'll force nobody, and that applies to all the people who tried to punish me in my life, they all failed lamentably, in fact all together they are the main force behind my revolt, my hate, my frustration and my desire for vengeance, they completely eliminated my desire, if there was ever one, to become a "normal" citizen, it's hard to fail more than that. If you want to change a bad way before it's too late, then arrange the reality to create the situation for my cooperation, because no amount of punishing will work on people like me. I understand that I must take my place, but if you want my potential, then you'll have to arrange your reality so people like me feel useful or appreciated, not worthless or worse; troublesome...

Now, it might be true like Hollywood that all those people never meet an innocent, or that innocents are so rare they're not worth the effort, but that's no justification; my experience is the base of my opinion about the reality I live in, I may have "understanding" for others, but the only person I know well is myself, your experience of reality is different because you're a different person, so why should I develop my opinion and judgment of reality from your point of view? Still, I always put myself in the skin of those of whom I'll affect the life of, even animals, because that's part of being human, and that's what all those people failed to do with me, stripping me of basic respect by bullshitting it for politeness. In the end, I will judge them like they judged me, and for now I'm trading respect for politeness, and no bullshit here, you reap what you sow, an eye for an eye for a minimum of equilibrium between good and evil...Our unconscious will always feel this from conflicting memory, and that's one of the reasons, apart from eternal injustice, why you have so many people "testing" the laws of this reality; people don't feel they're really in a fair or good reality.

As for those who received my opinion with a special on vehemence, well, you got my disrespect at the height of how you disrespected me, close your mouth and take it, we always have something to learn, what you have to learn here is that the fear you experienced is a backfire of your own attitude, and you never know when or from who it will explode, so yeah, you have the right to be disrespectful if you can take the risk, even develop it as a bad habit from only meeting people who can't fight back, and I will still be able to gain back respect for you, or ignore future involvement with you, no problem, but run to the police like a coward and lie, and you'll have a very hard time getting my pardon and I'll never forget your name until I have vengeance or a seriously felt sorry with an explanation about what you understood, long before I'm in a position to execute. And for those who wouldn't dare lose their spot on a bullshit competition pyramid, then so be it, keep your head full of it, spread it, but don't put the fault on those who fight it when you're frustrated or make a "depression". There are many of these constructions, pyramids of bullshit where everybody compete with everybody else's bullshit, where everybody is in denial, to keep its position or increase it, they don't want to touch the dirt, the worst they can accept is a shuffling that would amount to changing their brick's position within the same level, a waste of time and energy...

Frustration and bullshit, yeah, that's what you do with frustration, you must have the intelligence and imagination to direct its after effects instead of letting it reinforce a bad habit, or worse, let a system of leeches profit from it by directing it with pub... The same could apply to denial I guess. Me, I know its presence when I mumble a few fatalistic-ironic-sarcastic things in a row, then I compensate in something that can be good to more than myself, and I keep walking this line as I plunge deeper in the abyss of humanity's mess, because only through this hell can I find the stolen light, the one that can bring glory to the human race. I'll do it, and don't worry, you won't lose your porn...or your weed...or your commercial center and tall buildings, but the whole society, city designs, and the ways work and good attitudes are valuated will change, this or we fail escaping entropy.

As things degenerate, the high probability is that the highest part of the pyramids will simply revert to the same old actions it "loves" so much to do; increase the PMBBD war, manipulation, divert attention, try to take as much as possible. The slab of people who will revolt will do for all kind of funky reasons because they have been prevented from having something in their hands or developing their minds in harmony, the rest will stay in their peaceful corner watching their screen and having more entertainment while awaiting their turn at the deadly surprise, and if it doesn't work well enough and prisons are full, and revolt grows and persists instead of dwindling, they'll assassinate revolted people en masses, with martial law if need be, like they always do when out of options to control people. And don't worry there's always a baddy to tame to encourage the democracy-capitalism business all over the planet as the best system; you can revolt against anything else and the democracy-capitalism business will make its image on it, but what will happens when you'll revolt against it? If it fails to control you with its total panoply of tools? The same thing that happens when you revolt against a dictator; mass death, but there will be nobody loaded with weapons to take the role of good savior and instill fear for a chance at doing things peacefully.

Killing, pain, blood, violence, war! It's dirty around here, the mud of war, you thought I could skip it? No I can't, I don't even have the right to skip it, how nice! I can't leave that to the sole judgment and use of the members of an ego reality, particularly if some controlling people took the monopoly of it, and use it without the judgment of those concerned...Thanks for making my means tremendously limited, writing phrases... So I'll have to play in that too, scaring evil with what they fear and control, don't you think? And you know I'm not shy on choosing the worst enemy I can find, but we're in a free country they say! Anyway they're invincible; they can take a little bizarre and failed exploration of possibilities from the part of a socially assisted, and what do you think? I can carry enough ammo to do everything myself? Even if I passed my life warring it would not be enough to just limit the production of evil in this reality, and I'd have to constantly judge it and run after it. I want to do something else, but I'll still carry some ammo, don't worry; always keep some.

I'll base my judgment on time-lapse reaction to uprisings, and, as an uprising can form relatively quickly, the force to counteract it is launched immediately without an afterthought by controlling people; they won't choose a side, it is automatic magic, their side is historically chosen; these are inferior bums who need a good beating for peace. But first let's give them a good shot of PMBBD "love", since they're supposed to feel privileged to shake the hand of their favorite politician, or subjugated by the feeling of importance they project as manipulators. I wouldn't try to prove the contrary too much, punching one is exactly like punching god; you'll be in real trouble. While you do that you'll have to endure the pressure of the most tolerating and indoctrinated, most will sing "peace" "love" "democracy", but that would be underestimating the division through people; one will see things one way, the other another way. Rioting or "chaos" may accomplish something good as a last resort measure to incapacitate reality, in case it's the only option left, but it must be done as a last resort measure, planet wide, terribly violently, as good vs. evil, without neutral hassles. For now, that's out of the equation, the best manipulators and profiteers took all the means except deep unconscious will, and they may have succeeded at controlling this too with peace and "love", compassion, tolerance, adaptation, acceptance and PMBBD. But we'll suppose there's still a little frustrated or repressed or displaced potential.

Before using the only power left, we'll ask them to spend the means for a different way, in detail, since they're not the ones with the brains to understand such messages, or lead in these things, or like such ideas, they'll prefer to put pressure so you change, make a deal, or they'll manipulate in the long run. This message is not just for the façade, it concerns the whole gamut of palace people and the different bureaus defending them, the rich; industrialists, democratic gangs, religious bosses, gurus, technocrats, bureaucrats, police, FBI, CIA, lobbying pressure gangs, military Christmas trees, Hollywood PMBBD machines, psychological warfare industrials, pharmaceuticals industrials, genetic industrials, petroleum, food, etc, etc, you can find at least a hundred very rich gang that control one or the other facet of life to make ego gods. We must ask them to use the power and money they took to immediately birth a reality with different priorities, or to completely change the economic and politic system that is made to bring power and money to inadequate leadership, or leadership meant to fit a wrong view of life development. As for those who think the solution is democracy, fuck you! It doesn't work in this reality for many reasons I already explained, particularly in the present situation; you think you'll get a majority? For what? From whom? In how long? Go vote green party, it's inadequate enough to have a chance at governing standard, when it will be too late at it, and you're completely underestimating the mental momentum of most of the indoctrinated population, just look for what they move for; your mind and your actions are an investment in this reality's version of success, in the way it developed the reward system, and nobody likes to make bad investments (maybe except me), and there is something for anybody to justify, a way for anybody to discard responsibility too, it's nobody's fault if you don't care for what's most important, it's TV, everybody is supposed to party, after working hard, logically, and there are enough reasons provided by this reality for you to feel bad, at whatever extent appropriate for you, you sure don't need me to fuck-up your whole vision...

If nothing changes, before trying the good vs evil war (different than evil vs evil, with good sandwiched in between), we could show we are serious by expressing it massively; associating a vast pool of people and find a way to instill fear as a last warning, but that's not easy to do. First there must be a structure to somewhat direct or help people go beyond simple request with a slogan, and you can't do that while the communication structure is not available to you, what will you do if the government systematically shut down your sites, or even other internet functions with a virus? You need to have a safe structuring to be minimally effective against the mercenaries of the powerful (yes they follow the laws, which gives some troubles to evil, but who make laws? Do you actually vote for them? No, they are made by controlling gangs (governments) and their structures (politician gang vote, or supreme courts where the judges are named by politicians; what did you think? That the Supreme Court was made by god? That they are saints? No, they are humans who can be manipulated, or worst in a lot of instances, and it is not you that decides, and most laws are meant to protect systemized unfairness, the devil himself, and having the good people working for him is a must, to have beautiful things to fuck-up, small to medium evil can get a beating though, in the interdependent schema of hell.).

The police is highly structured to adjacency while the army is ultimately structured; if it wants a train, it takes it and move artillery anywhere, and they both are political extensions, the weapons in the hand of ego gods, or their well-trained dogs. That's the greatest efficiency point of an ego reality, not war on other countries, but war against its own citizens on a known territory, be it mind territory from PMBBD which is preventive and far slower, or police which is immediate, to an army installing itself if the police is in trouble. An army can besiege a revolted city, starve people in it until they surrender, and they can crush any people's blockade.

Yet, such an expression of true will could convince brain handicapped people that something's going on, it's a matter of risk, fear and investment; they could fear there is a risk to their investment, that it could all be wasted, for the ones who understand the importance of life, the rest will prefer to explode the earth than to put some means for the another way that could prove successful, or that most people would prefer, proving they were hypocrite slavers, and not getting their family name glorified, something like that.

A millions people could do the trick, if they could organize to the point of suddenly sweeping through random cities. It may be hard to do, but it's worth a try. You start with a few cities, with around a million people in each for a walk, as a message that you want a different way. The goal is not to take a sunny afternoon walk in peace, you have to show you are revolted and ready to force a revolution. Take a 9-12 hour walk as a few groups sweeping through the city, pillage light stuff while taking hold of heavy machinery to severely disable systematization structures, doing it quickly while always keeping group power momentum; losing it is death but a reward is not to discard, never stay behind for whatever reasons, keep order and communication at all cost but have a precise plan if communication fails, attain critical listed goals, advance, kill problematic police with the best guns or craziest people you got if they charge, don't be shy on bombs either, but don't kill policeman who are neutral; if they don't prepare to attack or defend.

That is the farthest you have the right to go for now, you don't use violence on neutral people, be them policemen or ordinary people. As for destruction, it is a right, not a necessity, you are better to cause surgical incapacitating actions for that step, but I don't believe in walks in the park to really change the world, you need to show you are serious, that you are ready to kill and destroy with proofs. I repeat; this is not a 100 000 people protest to practice the immunology system of this reality or to enjoy the outsides, it is a warning based on the belief that human potential is at risk, this is a step, the next step is the destruction of the ego reality, the system, and the death of many people.

Kick rich institutions, violently clear anybody doing the obstacle, killing is an option if it clears the obstacle faster, but no need to kill unnecessarily even if some will die by mistake and you'll have losses too. Around a hundred deaths is an acceptable toll when that many people are expressing some will for something as important as this at such a scale and in such a way. Even if it is not, we can almost still call it a non-violent protest, particularly considering all the wrongs done historically by profiting leadership leading humanity and life to destruction. Even global war may become necessary at the point they brought humanity to; since there are twice too many people too, it may be the only way left to people to stop this reality and permit humanity to survive. Besides, good become better when battling evil; and it becomes more evil helping it...

Don't be shy kicking media people stuff, they'll automatically make you evil if someone dies, since any non-peaceful on your knee manifestation is seen as wrong by media manipulators. But I say that any protest is supposed to show some violence, I don't believe in peaceful angry, I believe in angry that break things, and at mass level, a death tool is acceptable. In fact, peaceful walk in the park with a slogan on a pole is not convincing as true will to me, true will of change make people emotive, it drives people to extremes and it lasts a long time, there is even a risk of PTSD. As for stupid media people who pass their life manipulating and twisting words to satisfy their gang, you're better watch out, you're making yourself far too comfortable manipulating masses in harmony with the system you're dependent from, you're in a privileged seat to reap death without a need for judgment.

For now, we don't kill poor, innocent evil or neutral, but people who interpose themselves are not neutral, people who interpose themselves or make the obstacle must be cleared the fastest way possible, death is an option; you're supposed to lead this thing, not being led by those against you; if you can't remove people that block your way fast, then stay at home and forget it. Now, if people interposing themselves between you and material lead to an escalation of violence, then it is entirely the responsibility of those who blocked the way, even if media manipulators will say it is you that should do nothing.

What you're doing is exactly that, you're testing the reaction of those who got unfair means to your protest, including media manipulators, are they ready to consider the possibility of a different way? You'll know, if they send the army (or an army of policemen) to stop you, then it means they don't want to try something new, they see you as an enemy to their way, they have better use for the means, and it means you can up the ante of your protest to as many places as possible, a maximum of protests must violently arise in a maximum of places; a 1000 people protest in a small town is excellent, people can independently get out and do things, or many small groups can spontaneously form and do damage.

Keep communication and control, that way you stay better organized, carry voice carriers and find yourself many trustable "generals" and leaders that will keep things orderly, who will react in a good manner to new situation or opportunities, not always perfectly or the in the best fashion, but who won't make a power-trip or suicidal actions, leaders are very important, we must reward justly the best ones; those with the best judgment and effect. But they're not supposed to become rich...

So you'll have to plan in advance, and you'll need some leadership with a minimum of instinct at lunching people quickly to different strategies while exploiting people's emotivism when possible; walk, run, start plan, regroup, this is somewhat the minimum set of orders. But don't bother making things too ordered or complex, even if people must minimally stick to a plan, the fact is that it is very hard to get hundreds of thousands of people well ordered.

So you'll do better if you work minimally ordered as different groups with a leader for best effect. You can see it is as a few step pyramid, leadership talking to leadership directing a mass of people. As an example, you could try to divide the mass in groups, a group is formed of around 10 000 people, they could be formed in advance or on the spot if you got a few simple categorizing tools. We'll say many groups can be formed from internet communication in advance, with living in a certain area as a common denominator, then such group coming from an area will all wear a t-shirt of a certain color, that way they can easily stay together, another group may wear a cowboy hat, another group may paint their arms a color, other groups may form from within the city itself, giving themselves a rallying point at a precise hour, etc.

A leader from the group can be chosen randomly from wanting people putting their name in a bin, or he can be chosen by vote, then you immediately pick another one in case a replacement is needed for whatever reason like death or inadequacy, and that second leader may carry an emblematic flag for that group too, next, the leader will need at least 2 communication strategies that will reach his group by buffering; 25 people with a high flag spread evenly within the group may do that job, they carry a walkie talkie, or headphones, or an internet device, the leader talk to them and they talk to people; not everybody wants or need to know exactly what they're doing, most people just follow and participate in activities, but many people will want to know exactly what's going on and they will do it by sticking around those with the flag, and they'll pass the word to others.

But the leader will have to be capable of communicating well short orders without changing his mind every few minutes, and a big part of doing the job well is to have good timing capacity to start orders, and there are tools for that too, like raising a high pole meaning a basic order, like a flag meaning "following assault", another one meaning "regroup".

Finally, it's better if there exists one or a few quick lunch units that got some organization ability, they can be made of 50 to a hundred people selected because they are extremely serious about it, and they will do special actions.

As for people who are not grouped in advance, they can be organized on the spot; you slash them with some paint, they group together, they choose a leader and second, he is given a flag the color of his group, he get the means to communicate with the people that got a communication device within his group, and there you go.

Evidently, there are other options, as long as thing are kept efficient enough; for instance, I see nothing wrong with associating groups with music, you carry a flag meaning a type of music, and you play the music from a seriously equipped car in the middle of the group, and that same car spread commands. In the end, if we take 250 000 people separated in groups of around 10 000 people, that would give something like 25 leaders or 50 with the second, and now you got something that can act like an army. You can't do much better if you want organization with untrained people; a million people is not a platoon, it is a compact sea, you can't think about drilling and ranks and military flip-flop. But my definition is still gross, it is not guaranteed to work well, you may as well communicate a set of goals, limits, strategies and actions to the whole mass and to hell with better organization.

Now, the goal is not killing and massive destruction just yet, this is the peaceful tentative, and an opportunity to test things, but you can destroy some, you can use limited "chaos" strategy too. Neutrals are not supposed to stroll around in cars with angry people around, if they become a defense or an obstacle, the "innocent" in the car is not innocent anymore; cocktail him! He'll still have a chance to run home to his television. Use cars to your own advantage, with an emphasis on the more luxury stuff which need loads of fuel, give them the run of their life, limousines too, they are luxury tanks. I wouldn't be against the idea of rewarding some leaders with one, but those can become targets, and even if they are better preserved, including luxury cars and bunker homes, they are better destroyed than protecting the recipient of your message.

You can associate with anybody who want to truly help you and take the attitude, there are protesters gangs I've seen at some "G" summits that almost got it, there is some leadership there, but it's not sufficient and I'd be very careful about those singing anarchy, anarchist bear the same kind of stigma than the antichrist, both can be used to manipulate, to divide, to divert responsibility. In fact, I'm ready to bet many anarchist actions have been indirectly sponsored by governments, they are training responsible, if they need to make things degenerate for whatever reason, the rich will point at the anarchists as the responsible, so I don't trust them, whatever most are innocent of the fact they defend the evil they fight in truth, their revolt is just controlled through PMBBD to serve their enemy.

The police is not supposed to put its hands on your leaders or physical fighters, they are the ones that take things at heart the most, help them, defend them, never let the police touch them, and they need better means, organization and training, and can they kill? You have to seriously think about that because there is a risk you will witness death or suffering, if you can't take it join a more peaceful aspect of the protest, or stay home as a neutral. We don't want kamikazes though, at least not for now, but front runners are a must, and people used to such things are a must too.

We are a "relatively" nonviolent protest, but we are not disbanded or stopped at the point of a gun if we can overtake it, and we don't waste time, maybe a few breaks in the walk for people to regroup. See it like an orchestra, a tune you play, it's all a question of timing, leadership and timing. You can walk, you can sing, but have some harmony while keeping some shouting and explosive sound effects. Keep mission time then disperse fast, the same if you meet strong military you can't go over in around 1 hour. Once dispersed, start over some time later, a few days break is acceptable, even a week, use the time to prepare strategies and surprises. It would be a good idea to create a massive unit that is capable of moving to different cities as a surprise and motivational effect if you can. Some night walks, some day walks, and if you have to make lists of people, hide them and make false lists too.

Continue in such a manner until those who took the means decide to change attitude with immediate proofs, but that may take a long time since they'll use PMBBD to make you terrorists! Terror! Terror! Terror! And they would never bow to your demands! Since you're not "peaceful"! But as long as they don't use their war weapons to kill you all "peacefully", you can continue with some variations of this scenario, and don't forget to sabotage stuff, always do things in an optic of surprise as much as possible, so have some variations and unpredictability, a bag of surprises.

Now, for each people you kill, they will probably up the ante by killing more on your side, don't embark in their game, keep it to your goals, and those are not to kill people, only people that interpose themselves to some extent, and some selected evil, you are still protesting and asking for a different way with a stronger warning than just "peacefully" begging with a please. You're saying that you won't let their system bring about the end by continuing in this path like an indoctrinated sect.

For as long as nothing changes, you can increase the cadence of this, or damage, kill evil, take bigger rewards, bring it worldwide, whatever the system totally crash and famine starts, anyway, you're supposed to be ready to go to that extent for humanity to survive. If they don't listen to your wishes, then you up the ante to rampage, you pillage and destroy as much as you can, under some limits, and always preferably within some order and basic leadership.

You must always keep your strength and potential for another strike, because at this point you are really fighting an enemy, not protesting anymore, and you must do it simultaneously in as many cities as you can muster the people to do it, each city you scrap is like a hit on this reality, you are crashing your fist on it, ruining it.

If they still want to battle you, if they still don't want to help try another way, then the only solution left will be to kill every single person that defend, even encourage, this reality until it is disabled. But don't forget that their wish may be that a class of people declares war and save their situation by raising population against population by waiting eternally to the point that people start to attack you by themselves.

Yes, they may be waiting for exactly that; a mass arising counteracted with another mass that will see you as an exit to their frustration they can't associate rightly because they're invested or indoctrinated; in hell you must always think of possible manipulation as a priority. And while populations kill themselves, they'll be giving rallying and peace speeches, while they enjoy the view in their comfortable hole, sipping brandy and describing the damage with a "it's terrible" "inhuman" now and then for the camera; don't think manipulators and profiteers care about people. And most are prepared to last 100 years in comfort; whatever happens they'll survive in a vast majority, uprisings, cataclysms, mass death weapons, you die for a lesson and they get out of their hole victorious and start the same philosophy all over again. So don't do it for more than a few months before understanding that they want it, pass to the next step which is to eliminate them, crossword style. Or abandon, I'll understand, most people are already fighting one way or the other, living comfortably peacefully is not given to many people in this reality, and did I mention that fights are supposed to be temporary? It is very tiring and depressive to have to continually fight deaf and blind people, living is not fighting, living comfortably is a minimal priority to say the least, and you don't get much of that when you're fighting.

People who help you proportionally to what they can do are on your side. The principle not to forget is "proportional to what they can do" that's the spirit from which you separate people who bullshit and those who are really on your side. Neutrals are those who just get a job or do their best to fit in, just never forget that if things go to the point of global war, your main enemies are not neutral people unless they mount opposition. If possible, we'll definitively want a list of those who involve themselves on the side of good before things degenerate, and neutrals and people who lost everything. All those who will want to choose "good" because they see survival or profiting will have to move their ass and take a side before things degenerate, because neutrals people can't exist, they will be automatically evil by their neutral attitude, they must use their judgment and defend something.

Besides, if you think I'll let neutrals defenders of this reality destroy this earth because of their dependences, you're mistaken; if you have the right to kill life, love and humanity from neutrality or "who cares" attitudes, I can do it too for a chance. Neutrals who just encourage this system are automatic enemies in such a total war scenario, neutrals are the one that did everything the rich and powerful wanted of them, they're working hard leeches that just stick to a system they want to be dependent from, and in this reality, their whole mind is developed to become future exploiters and profiteers if an opportunity arises, there are no neutrals, one way or the other, and their only chance at pardon is if they drop the neutral bullshit fast enough.

It is definitively not when it will be too late that it will be time to change, it's not when your house is surrounded by lava that it's time to drop the possessive attitude, or when you'll have lost everything in a cataclysm, it is not when you lose your television that you wake to reality, or when your internet fails that you start talking sense, you change attitude when you know, if not you prove your inadequacy, minimally. When you'll be drowning in crap by your attitude, I won't be there to save your ass, particularly if you implore god's help.

So choose a day where you'll truly start to act with a different attitude and protest, anything, stop working, or stop reproducing, or globally eliminate an industry or institution you want out, then another, then another, but try to do things at a minimum uncontrolled destruction. Choose targets, have priorities, make steps, do things with consciousness, take control of things without unnecessary wasted energy on destruction, structures are tremendous energy and resources expenditures too, but whatever, you may need to fight to death and dismantle everything too. But you must act with a global goal and with true sustainable will.

Your main enemies are people who possess and profit from things too much, the rich, powerful, superior, those are your immediate targets; the most worthy kill is always the boss, that's the truth, even if his admirers, and those who envy him, and those dependent from him, will go kaput over it; don't you ever kill the boss or the whole of connected people will see you as criminals, particularly his rich friends with their rich media institutions! But the fastest way to stop killing is to kill the boss, and it got the most immediate satisfaction effect while limiting torture or the chance of PMBBD pardon. And that includes unfairly rich "super" "stars", sorry, I would like to think otherwise but I can't; we are talking war to anybody defending the biggest evil attitude here, there is two sides in a war; choose, and not when the side you fought against is winning.

People must not wait until warriors are at their doorsteps, when you wait for too late to fall on your knees, it will because you're dying. People who took a lot of means can help the most, but they must do it before being forced to it, if they have the right attitude they'll be of great help; assets, if they prove they are not traitors. People who take a lot should be the most exemplary, so they should be among the first to join and help proportionally to what they can do; in fact, they should already have encouraged one way or the other the first protestations for another way.

I don't know, "super" "stars", it's like something sacred, and I like some of these, am I going too far? Celine, that would be one big enemy, completely ridiculous, brain churning kind of ridiculous, I bet she's got invincibility! Like presidency! Popular gods like that can raise a 2 million horde of fans who are ready to pay! Think how she is fantastically out of its mind rich, rich and rich, a mountain of money! A reflection of the priorities of this reality, super precious, people would die with her like a cult! No hypocrisy with me, right in the reality, sorry if I'm not discriminatory, rich is rich to me. But don't worry, if she got a chance she'll send a check to save some seals and make a visit so you can get flash banged from her illuminating "presence". And poor people longing for their success story, working hard or raising family, on the verge of depression, dependent from the investment, lost in PMBBD, who think entertainment is dependent from the reality they invest themselves in, who don't know what money is, will gladly make her richer for the dose of illumination, if only to boast they saw her live, they almost touched the diva...And I'm not talking about those who dream of becoming some ego monster like her, like there is enough people and money for it! Imagine! That's the death machine you're up against, the monster, the hydra, and she's only a tooth in the mouth of one head.

And the selection will give counter pressure if you do anything violent near a popular ego god, you can't even verbally attack the manipulation machine that makes them big beyond measure without getting in court and discredited with personal attacks about your past since you're not a saint. People who get their vision put back straight will feel all dizzy about your view of sanity, they'll go denial to gain back a feeling of security, and they'll denounce you to the police if they recognize you, to prove they are good, they'll be out with the broom immediately after your passage, they will cry all over the place for all those unfair profiteers and users of PMBBD on masses you attack, politicians, superstars, media people, there is already a national funeral for every one of them that dies, worse if you kill them, they'll be glorified as saints, you stopped them living forever the way they like it, and billions of people will cry on the social network about how great they were, and it will be publicized all over the world as a tragedy by newsmen! Don't think someone will glorify the other side of the medal, not even defend it with fairness of arguments, no, no justification possible except your problem in the head.

All those emotive singers singing "love" for their popularity, all those politicians singing changes for their power-trip, they'll be defended until the end, even glorified, but never the ones who truly, in truth, stood for love and fought for changes, systemized unfairness oblige and you're not peaceful, tolerating, accepting, adapting, compassionating, pardoning, admiring enough, you're not subjugated by the machine. Most people are entrapped in the most complex sect, and all they need to keep on believing is to be fed entertainment, some emotive slick tongue sexy paroles, and a death, to go emotive, since everybody dies, and these emotions must be a limited facet of the work of life, selected manipulated emotions on hype and PMBBD, until the day comes when you can't have true emotions in harmony with life's work, like me that have no right to express my emotions to their true extent unless I do a hate crime; I must show emotions that people want to see, it would be perfect if I started crying in hysteria in front of a singer, but if I show the emotions that really drive me from my personal use of consciousness (my brain), like anger, in front of that same singer, I'll be tagged negatively as a crazy or violent, if I don't end-up in prison, and media people will proudly show me under the most negative light. So you see, I can only express what the rich want as emotions, the greatest source of evil not only must be protected from destructive emotions, but it must reap admiration, and the unconscious message as feelings must be distorted and displaced elsewhere with PMBBD, as murder in the family if needs be.

For now, you can't even beat li'll Celine. Think of the poor family she'd leave behind, it would be big! Word trade center kind of shaking; the foundation of reality would be shaken; Celine out of order? Think of the throng of people that would go kaputt, and all the rich would associate for war, this is something that can't happen to a rich, something is very wrong, it takes one hell of a dark age...

The hard core of evil will be well hidden and protected, you'll have to kill tons of mercenaries armed to the teeth and bodyguards, blast open bunkers, requisition yacht, control airports, bash down fences, invade luxury places, all kind of things like that to get at them. Don't think it will be easy, they have the money, they have the means, they are fearful, they know they are the cause of massive unfairness from the beginning, or from the moment they got things explained to them for the innocents who should never have gotten such means, but evil is evil. Fight until all is left are people controlling things for good reasons, like to keep an adequate structure of technology, knowledge, medicine, food, everything to build a better ideal; you don't need people paid a million to make an industry work, anything can work at the minimum salary, even a "super" "star", but that's not fairness either, fairness in life energy worth is based on good principles defining the civilization, there are people that are worth more to civilization and life goals, and the counterbalance is that there are who are worth less, but the fundamental must be for anybody acting in a good manner to be worth living comfortably. 3/4

I guess that food and health will become a priority at some point, so always have it at the back of your mind, but everything will depend on what means you'll be capable of gaining. If you have to fight with guns against the army with its tanks and bombers, you're as well abandoning, it is suicide. So in the end, this simple, unrealistic and somewhat ridiculous view is just a quick dose of idealism I got, like I thought humanity was not really condemned, as it is dependent on having big military capacities to defend your side, if not, stick to protesting, but if mentalities don't change the way things are presently going, someday there will be massive death everywhere, and in 100 years it will be the end, humanity's potential will be a fraction of what it is today, it won't have a use for dreams or ideals, no spreading in the galaxy, only profiting competition will be left as a goal, it will be hell and regrets until we disappear.

There are other options, no better, but if you want a 100% "peaceful" effective protest, here's one; stop reproducing! But for that to be effective you'd need at least 3 billion people doing it, without a country exception; I don't like countries that populate unfairly, whatever the people do unconsciously, worse in fact, since I'm into love a lot, which I see as a civilized thing, and the best path of reproduction, then I'm not an amateur of country competition either. Are you ready to stop reproducing globally to force change? Can you build a list of 3 billion people that will vow not to do it for as long as it will take? I don't believe it. Or stop working for as long as it will take? I don't believe it. Dump the internet? Which has become another tool in the hands of manipulators and profiteers?

Many options are available as a protest, and aren't we living at the epoch of super communication? And we can't make lists of vows? There are all kind of vows people can start taking at a precise date globally, but maybe people better like a good old revolt with some fire and broken stuff than these options...understandable. One thing's for sure, consciousness that need a regular day every year to express itself in comfort while your lifestyle make you a traitor to what you supposedly defend is a joke. In fact these walks in the park as people divided for this or that cause, is exactly what ego people want; some kind of reminder that they got to think about other people than themselves.

I know, I'm just a frustrated dreamer, a residue of baby boomers self-importance and peace and "love" condemnation (I won't start demonizing them, it's of no use anyway, they invented psychopaths...) but the thing is, we're under such a pile of PMBBD now, or so condemned that no scenario of true change may be possible, none, whatever the communication structure, we may be totally condemned. In fact, the big peace and "love" push may as well have been the final death of a chance for a better world, we are peacefully invalid, peace which is so constructive, it accomplishes so much, like having more time to make bigger armies with bigger war machines for more defense. But I'm bad, I like peace, I want to live in peace!

So yes you may be better accepting it and forgetting all this while awaiting the end in your version of peace, anyway, you think you'd raise millions of people to defend life or a better ideal in this entertaining reality? That's big eh! What percentage do you think is motivated, 1%? I already explained the many reasons why there is no way out of this, particularly with the pressure selection. People will go all the way to the end of humanity while thinking they're doing their best. It took history to make the sect, so if you want fairness and decide to battle for it, never make the mistake of believing that the well invested hordes will help you or be on your side, they are the small gears making systemized unfairness unstoppable.

People who cumulated things will be against you too, the more they cumulated and invested the more they will want your failure. Who do you think can really fight unfairness or evil? As always the poor and the young, or people who have not much to lose; you think people who succeeded in this reality will risk losing their status? No way! They got a house, a car, big computers, friends like themselves, they invested a lot to get an education to have a job, to get the economy grinding, and they'll defend their system at the level they invested their life energy in it, while criticizing it a little for good measure, like saying nothing is perfect...

So for those who want to battle for life and humanity, you'll have to go a lot farther than saving some animals, you'll have to either battle for a territory that can grow to experience another way than the ego-gods ideology to raise civilization, or, if it is impossible, you'll have to stop this reality before it ends everything. And don't think I'm exaggerating, I'll add some far worse affirmation; it will have to carry an ideal and an alternative before people revolt gratis on this or that aspect of a global irreversible degenerating momentum, because once at that point it will be too late, it will be random violence for nothing better, the seals will take the toilet, the whole oceans will be a dump, life and all humanity too.

And that concerns all people who are considered as adults, or who consider themselves as such in this reality, 16 and over, they can have sex with 50 years old at that age, the army recruit them at that age, they make porn at that age, take drugs and drink alcohol at that age, they put pressure on parents to be seen as adults at that age, then they'll take adult responsibilities.

And don't think I don't know how all this book sounds stupid; it is all a stupid book, what do you think? That all of a sudden good and evil is different and you have to choose? Humor man, humor, think of how that would sound on the news! Laughable. You think your life, your land, your stuff, your entertainment is guaranteed, and you'd laugh and cower in fear in your materialism until someone barges in your place to ask you to choose and take action... You'd await those psychopaths with a gun! It's too ridiculous, so much there is no doubt in your mind that you'd shoot them. Good and evil, Ah! It's in the bible, it's the law, doesn't exist, only evil Arabs do! Your side is already chosen. Or is it? Then what are your criteria to differentiate good from evil? Explain! I do. What are those actions that this reality consider evil to the point of killing? Write a justified definition of it like I did all along my writings, or endorse a definition that is logic and make sense, not an ambivalent and conflicting one to include family. What is true love for you? What is unfairness for you? Is manipulation of masses with lies a good thing to you? All kind of questions that must, critically important, fit as a whole interrelated web.

Now, don't think I like it that much writing about these things, I wasted half my time and half my brain in this shit, my creativity should have been spent elsewhere where I don't have to understand (not love) my enemy...to know who the fuck it is...and how to battle it... What gods imprinted in my head is a flower to life, little did I know I'd be dropped on a terrain that can't grow it...Violence options are a part of the bit of ugly that I had to expose to make it a possibility, and it is truly the case, I exposed the ugly as a matter of being constructive, if I wanted to start a real profound enumeration of all the evils of this reality, I would pass my life continually writing disgusting stuff, but at some point I guess I'd have gone totally insane. So sorry for the anger emotions and violence expressions, I must acquiesce that's a part of me, of being human too, a part that I must expose some, and on what are based war plans? Mostly attitudes we don't like, and who has the monopoly of making such plans? Now, talking about war won't prevent me from having a good sleep, I truly hope things don't come to that, and I'll act with faith on that. That's why I put warnings to say that's my strong opinion, to form your own opinion, I'm a part of humanity, I have ideals, beliefs, I want and wish humanity to take a different direction because I believe it imperatively must, but humanity goes its own way, whatever it is controlled by people who give me the minimal right to compete against them for directing it toward my priorities. controlling it, within the shema of laws they made that reflect their fearas I might add...

That's how it works in the ego-gods ideology, to battle ego gods you have to remove them from the throne boldly and put them back at their right place in humility, because this throne is the throne of death. And who is the muscle of ego-gods? People; around half this reality is made of people who would weight evil in my view, and whatever I'm right or wrong in quantity, I believe there are people who are acting good, and others acting evil and we must fight evil. Do you believe in good and evil? I do, so where is evil if it is not you? Where? Nowhere? Tell me! I can tell you where to find some, some attitudes showing it, do you? And who can be my muscle? People too, but my goal is the contrary, it is not to put the means in the hands of the few, neither to enforce systemized unfairness, neither to manipulate, neither to profit, neither to exploit in fuck all free for all love, etc. My goal is to remove division for ego competition from controlling things and to give the means to people to decide civilization ways in a life respectful way.

And don't think they don't know a better way can be made, they arrange innocence with PMBBD so people don't think things could be fantastically better while they enforce a pressure selection to reflect the way they want "their" population. And they know that from 5000 years ago, it's an old and forgotten momentum of evil, an exponential recipe perfected every year, to the point that evil think they're good. As for war, it's a last measure to keep the possibility of another better way alive, or just for gaining time, surviving, or to force a change of attitude. And who is ready for this? Not me; the rich and powerful are ready, they have everything to last a hundred years hidden in comfort, so when the hell they created will finally burn, and people are left with death, destruction, horror, sickness and hunger, who will get out of their hole? The worst monsters of unfairness, the most ego people, the superiors, the powerful, the fearful, with their appropriate family dynasties. They'll just wait long enough with a force of some kind, or finish-off ability, and they'll profit from the opportunity that people simply can't take no more violence and bloody horror to get out of their place and take back control of things, by force if they must, people will have no choice to bow to them, and they'll end-up as good saviors since they'll manipulate history, they'll systematize ego competition all over again and never again people will doubt the way of things or want to try something else, we'll carry on until the end.

But I believe we'll get destroyed by life systems before that, as we'll have proven with finality that we're a redundant failure at respecting life. If we're lucky some superior aliens gods will make slaves out of us, since that's what we absolutely believe in, that's what we wish to death, that's what we encourage with all our strength to the end; we can't act independently associated with good global principles goals and ideals. So, when I say we are at a turning point, I mean it.

So understand me a little, and don't apply me a psy problem too fast for my spirituality, it comes with the job which no member of this reality has the competence to develop adequately in interrelated philosophy. But I'm still a person and I want to be treated as such, even if the enemy I have chosen forces me to act bigger than anything, too big for anybody alive, so my work is my extension, my big side, you're not supposed to need me after this, even if I'll still want to help as the little human I am. And I must see people as taking my side, I must tell them the hell they are in, and I hate hell, so I tell them to get out of it, whatever I'm not always nice.

It is possible that everybody is innocent of fundamental old wrongs, but now everybody can have a good idea, if they want it, so nobody can play the neutral or innocent game. Since there are two sides to this, I try to give some general directions and understanding even if I'm incompetent at mass revolt and war, all along my surprise package since the risk exists that I'll be assassinated. So I must believe you can do something good from my work, it's my immortal side; I'll always be with the people who live for life, even if they're not in total harmony with me. As for weapons of war, they are the last tool you should consider, I believe disarmed protesters can cause a lot of damage with clubs, if professional sports fans can be of any example, to the point of costing so much economically if sustained that another reality becomes a better investment, but I wouldn't trust rich people who need a spanking to see sense...

And whatever you get people motivated, that "peaceful" revolution (the warning scenario) thing was just a crazy scenario with too many things that could go terribly wrong with paranoid powerful people; what would you do against an atomic bomb? Some anthrax rain or napalm? Napalm would evaporate your revolution with efficiency. Even a rain of paratroopers would be very problematic, or is it fun? Maybe for some if you have good guns... But such a mass death riposte would be an automatic declaration of war since no other option exists, the only option left is planetary absolute total war to disarm this reality.

For now, the question is more like how would you form groups of hostile people, half of which with guns, for a walk of destruction? A million people who will actually be there, that is more than what can fit in your imagination (it seems to fit in my night dreams though) no armies on earth have ever taken a hostile walk with that number under order, and at city size, it's not that big, your group may better be seen as the needle of a clock, a center point for regroup while striking groups advances around the clock.

You'd need a big slab of the people from the city itself, or there in advance, advanced spotters too, and an efficient and safe way to transport throngs, and a large area to quickly form. Logistics, logistics...Even if you limit the weaponized aspect to a 50 000 army that can join an already going protest randomly, a procession of trucks full of people stashed like sardines would attract attention, you can't have a surprise effect, particularly if you have no weapon industry to provide your side; you would need an advanced force to empty the weapons stores of the city and rejoin the main group while blasting at following police, because you can't "steal" weapons and ammo in the night when the police is at top efficiency. Whatever you do it will be a fight with the police just to form the groups of people within a few hours, even if heavy guns and armor arrives first and form platoons to clear the police, which will be coming at you with dispersal tools like sound blasters and tear gas canisters, and nude women with beer to make you drop your weapons...

And don't forget that ammo is heavy and limited and you need good stuff to pierce those plastic shields, you're almost better shooting at their knees, and they must be cleared fast, you can't stay long without moving unless army copters and jets appear, and you'll need appropriate stuff and expertise for those too since they're the first thing that will come at you, long before tanks, and don't think they won't, even if it will be a declaration of total war, and predictable since you'll automatically be tagged as terrorists, doing terror, terror from the deep! But yes, people who interpose themselves in your path and many symbols should definitively feel some terror.

You can accelerate things but you're still around 4 hours from transportation spotting to actually moving in the city, and that is reaction time for some of the army, there is a high risk they'll be waiting at all bottleneck points halfway through your "walk" with guns bigger than you.

Even if it could start earlier and gain power from late people rejoining, how would you disperse everybody quickly once you've taken your "walk"? You'd probably run into heavy opposition, and the worst thing that can happen is getting yourself surrounded and forced to occupy the city. And even succeeding in taking your walk, probably nothing will change, you're just a big bunch of organized bum anarchists and terrorist with guns, young and worthless bad people, like me, probably not very educated either, kill yourself now. Yet, maybe you are the only really good people left (fighting evil in truth of actions), giving humanity its last chance.

Evidently, this scenario can escalate to civil war if the military gets involved. A better option would be a significant association of all kinds of powers, like spiritual and religious involvement of all kind, many rich or popular people involvement, even older people involvement, many nationalities involvement. You can separate those in significant platoons, but I'd be careful doing that since they could be more easily targeted, it may be a better idea to keep things mixed, with a good batch of military resources and expertise too. All in all, it would probably be more meaningful if many aspects of society embarked, but to me a good person is worth its weight in gold whatever the sphere of society. There are other options, maybe better, like having many associated groups in cities that continually do harassing actions, like guerilla, doing these as organized massively associated quick strikes; in-out-in.

I know all that is utopist, if only they could understand the situation, I wouldn't have to think about these things, what will it take? The whole earth on its knees begging in peace? Invent the day of the begging? I'd be ashamed, I'm always ashamed when I see beggars, whatever the form.

It's a shame revolted people have to consider things like death and destruction, you're not much of a best system when your people need to kill and destroy to get themselves understood...But it may be the only solution to stop this reality if nothing changes, and in such a situation, the goal must be reached while still limiting death and destruction when possible, particularly to keep basic infrastructures running.

What's worse is that whatever we do the system will have to switch priority, and any big change is probably be a sign that things will get better for many people. One thing's for sure, if things get destroyed a lot while tons of people are already having troubles feeding well, then food will become more of a priority. And that applies to a war situation with this reality; we will have to keep food production without increasing pollution from fertilizers, and distribute it, and I'm not talking about silos of rice and grain we're so proud to distribute to Africans, I bet they would prefer to eat what we give to our animals; we'll have to help people, not sink them in more troubles, we'll have to work well together and explain what must be done to survive well while a solution is worked out to bring things back on track.

That could be the new job of military people when things settle, switch berets and dresses, become the target of needs, the blue beret thing got the spirit. With the help of all the other associated structures, like food and medicine, the army could develop as a terrain building and acting force, all the way to the new reality, taking a place and making it "new reality friendly" by working with people and dealing with the transformation while protecting borders, carrying heavy weapons to stay battle ready, because the option must exist until it is not necessary anymore. All that while the police keep order as usual.

They can make it a show if it is not too expensive and done professionally too, people like planes and copters and ships and paratroopers, but good organization and use of means must show. Being serious is one thing, but you got to at least smile when you have no reasons to be that serious, or when things go well. And there is not just the smile that must sometimes show; there is the organization, structure, means, and signification. If you can debark in a town within a week while people know why you are there, they're born to have some inspiration, even if others won't like it. Then you can do what you need to do, like taking control and associating structures, inspect the place, drop a grenade in a hole, help expertise, move houses, recruit, you can fall in love too, but you know how I see love.

In that situation, a new reality territory will need organized and helping "terrain people", so you'll be associated to that too, human and life contacts, so you'll listen to people's stories and dreams, and they will be taken into consideration. But that's just a future option for an army meant to help a new reality; they can be disbanded too, if they're in it only for the killings.

Military people are nice when they don't make a power trip or start to rape or go crazy PTSD...Seriously, never underestimate their capacities, they can do a lot to help a new reality, not just fighting, and not as saviors that exhaust themselves doing everything, but as commanders that bring the means and example to people, a dig, a ditch, a pile of rock, a building, a road, a bridge, local people must help themselves, but their main connection to a systematization of information that can be directly used on the terrain can be the military, if they don't point guns at the people they're supposed to help. I understand that a gun can be a powerful convincing argument, but the goal is not slavery, and it's far more rewarding to do things through understanding. If people don't react in the ideal scenario, either you explain better, or get more specialists, or you let them try their things with some help and opinions and supervision, they've been living there. Yet, in this situation you're supposed to deal with people who want a new reality, who are ready to do some efforts for it, not enemies. Respect military people, they're the most grounded and associated and they have become more careful with cultural values.

The navy will need to requisition rich mega ships, to transform them as a fleet of emergency ships so we can send to places that get a big problem; for a million people in troubles, it could be of tremendous help, and a little comfort out of their troubles, relaxing on a jewel of a ship many wouldn't visit. If you arrive with a few such ship, you have tremendous helping options, food, amenities, comfort; if they take a shower before embarking, you can make a cycle system that unload people in shifts, or you can carry them elsewhere since a lot of people will lose their place, they'll have to be given options where they can have another place. At the least you remove a load of homeless from troubles right away, but probably the rich wouldn't touch their ship anymore...It's a shame I have to think of these things, why didn't it ever cross the mind of a rich to do such a thing while they're so happy to show their face when there is a cataclysm?

But all that is just to keep people living in a crisis scenario without falling in "chaos", like keeping stability and the means to make a new reality after a cataclysmic situation, not necessarily war or environmental or monetary, we could get a retarded by medicine epidemic of all kind of diseases that could suddenly explode in death, particularly if some people start exploding pharmaceutical industrialists, thus causing problems in the pharmaceutical dependent population, including the old. And don't forget to keep an eye on those nuclear reactors and oil rigs everywhere. I told you things could degenerate in one big impossible brothel, and it is no joke, too many things are reaching critical, even the end! And most problems are wanted and necessary parts of everything, to the point that we're dependent from reaching the end! Looks like it at least...

So even if you wish to clean things a bit, you will never succeed with your little finger while your memory (civilization) is full of these rotten areas nobody cleaned from the beginning. Anyway, the garbage can would have to contain a damn lot of, well, recyclable matters, and it would have to be made all over the world which can't be done since the worst detritus live hidden in their well-guarded fortresses and they only have to gang themselves a little to buy an invincible army since their selection can be bought that easily, at low salary. And you wouldn't want a thousand brand new terrorists like Ben Laden spending their many millions planning horrors of all kinds, and that's supposing this reality want to clean itself, which it won't do since governments "think" everything is all-right and always getting better, so the best it'll do is to throw the rag on the most evident bad spot (some pressure), that is in harmony with their vision of what is bad (I'd probably get the rag).

All you can do is vote democratically for the next politician, and the next, and the next, all making promises that things will be better with them around, after they kick this or that, after they arrange better this or that, Everything is controlled by the rich and powerful, and people have been selected through history to just want to vote to select a politician to run the business, they don't want to decide more than that, too lazy intellectually, too many objects to play with. Maybe a choice of answers once in a while, or some babbling on the social networks garbage can to feel their opinion is important, or their judgment is on par with the rest. So those who truly want a better way, or the inferior people, can't do anything, except displace their frustration to stupidities, or entertainment, or babbling, or divided controlled protestation, peace, work, wait and hope, yeah, hope, damn hope.

As for pseudo protesters that walk in the park, or bumming the ones they are jealous of, if you are inefficient at realizing a truly important goal or eliminating a problem after years of "protestation", then you're a failure, the same if you want it, or need it, or like it, or "love" it. You are becoming systemized to the point that you are a pyramidal subsystem inefficiency, a cost, worse than useless. Get some results or you become something that profit from an occasion for some fun, to let steam off, a different form of entertainment, or a tool to develop the immunology system of reality, or bums we get rid of with candies, not even worth think a minute about.

I know it's stupid and totally against evolution and being human, peace and love kind of ridiculous, but if most people dumped it all for 50 years, take lands by force to survive, found the will to stop working tomorrow and start living more independently, gardening, raising chickens, all in all going back to very low basic while still trading between friends, letting forests grow back, living from it, dumping the democracy-capitalism business for a different peaceful life for some time, what do you think would happen in this reality? The system would crash after a few months, money would become almost worthless and the rich would go kaputt proportionally to the dwindling of their pile of gold and diamonds, then it would be massacre time to force people back in the system, and after a hundred years we'd be back to a more manipulative and invincible form of the great democracy-capitalism business.

I know there wouldn't be enough people and it wouldn't last, it's just to tell you that if people quit this system with the capacity to stay away, then this system would declare war to get them back, or for disobeying its order of things, communism style, liberty, fairness, competition, want to prove the contrary? Let space for a different reality in fairness of means and let's see.

That's about it for revolt and war for now, see it as an introduction because I'll come back to this in A Place To Grow. My opinions may be unusual, I may have a far-fetched vision of life, I may talk violence, but I will drop on my knees to tell you I feel right at home in my soul. No way out of it, when I see how I'm manipulated, when I see all the money put on ridiculous things or for show while protesters for truly important things immediately get the police, when I can't find a place where I can live free of profiteers, when I want to hide so much I'm sick of understanding, when any fight, either physical or mental, is lost in advance because someone took control of all my options before I was born, when I rage at the many forms of submission I see, then I ask myself if I should not leave this place, leave it to someone that will thrive in it, because it is my experience that when you like the earth and life when you're young, this reality will quickly break your heart over and over again as you grow an adult, and you will find nowhere to turn your wish for a better world to (except controlled pressure groups), no enclave to soothe your heart and find true hope; you will have to submit or you will become a pariah and you don't survive very well and in happiness as such.

I'll keep on imagining that there is a way out, if I'm to stay constructive, so strap yourself in, you're not done flying with me, soon we'll have to fire for a patrol in space, lots of powerful beings roam everywhere there, we just never saw them it seems, but I'll plant a few warning signs, just in case.

For now, to reach planetary equilibrium, in other words, to have a true chance at interstellar travel, my opinion is that we will have to control the environment of the earth first, and make a more adequate reality for life (always include us). We absolutely must have a safe bottom line we can always go back to while we experiment to have and keep control. Part of being human is that we have those global effects, want it or not, that's part of what we have to experience and that's part of what happens, and what we do too, only us can do it, no animals. If we want to live on another planet in our system we may have to take such steps, try things as scary as the first atomic bomb, trusting scientists, mathematicians and chemists to do things well enough. And life around us must be able to tough us, if it can't go through a little heat or a little pollution then it is because life did not meant us to live together, but I don't believe that at all. We must be able to control our effect; we are life too.

Any drastic fluctuation of the ideal values is exactly like losing the control of a nuclear reactor only fantastically worse. When you have a drastic fluctuation in the reaction of a nuclear reactor, you don't laugh, sit down, light a cigarette, read the bible or watch hockey! You drop the stuff and get your ass moving to gain back your ideal reaction unless you totally lose control and it becomes too late, unless you know what you're doing or need it. And it's the same thing for the earth; whatever the fluctuation is natural, accidental or created by us, it doesn't matter; we have a very serious problem coming and if we don't take back control, then unprecedented measures must be taken to reach back our status of stability unless we all burn, or freeze, or drown, or turn upside down, or cough to death, or fly out in the wind.

However, if we think a few degree more could eventually cycle to stabilization of climate, then life will adapt to the new environment, and no choice, it always been doing it. But it will take some time of stability, and isn't it strange that we came to exist from stability of climate, and just raising it a few degrees makes it that much unstable? Furthermore, the way I see life, I'd have a tendency to believe it will seek to change the environment for its best path, which may be changing from the knowledge we gain, so, before entering in a war with life for making a human only planet, we may be better dealing with our attitude problems first, doing so may bring to light a new environment that will better deal things between us and wild life.

But it is still mostly our choice as to what ecosystems we want to be associated to on earth, gaining a few degrees may develop other interesting long term life, as valuable as the ones that died, which proved too fragile. In a sense we die for change, what can evolve is not meant to stagnate to infinity, but it's a long process, and the greatest life value is gained in diversity, so even losing a fragile specie is bad, but you can't have them all, and humans got many other needs and concerns.

We now know and live in the proof that CO2 raise the temperature by making of the planet a greenhouse and I don't think heating the planet will be a problem for us, we have sufficient industrial infrastructure to heat the place for a long time, but we are absolutely not controlling the reaction thanks to our philosophy, and letting the temperature raise out of control could trigger complex uncontrollable chain reactions that could destroy lots of life.

The other thing is that if hot humidity increasing means wilder temperatures; will we be happy living on a planet where it's humid almost all the time or where there are dangerous environmental events wreaking havoc regularly? And you got to take life in consideration, never underestimate life and its goals, it created complex interrelated and interdependent ecosystems to sustain us. You may think that's not how it works, so who cares, but I like to care that much so fuck you. What I mean is that if we become a deception we risk losing its respect altogether; we are its ultimate tool, we are the ultimate potential of life, all life on earth exists for us. Do you see a white god showing off? No, you see life and matter, we are a species; we are a whole made of independent individuals forming a civilization, we are all different with different levels of skills and those are far from making superior people, even if someone is the best at some skill and some skills are more valuable than others.

Logic says that you should have life on your side spiritually, which is not the case, we are against it through our inability to develop adequately for good, like the betterment of life, its greatest invention; language, minimally. So I'll say that it is a guess, you don't know if life systems will make things better or worse, it depends on our potential left to make life thrive, and if there is another option. That could be changing from one decennia to the other as we struggle and life systems struggle with us. If we take an uncontrollable tangent, life systems may turn against us in a surprising or profound not evident way, since life is under the effects of what we know and do, action reaction. One thing's for sure, our existence is not even guaranteed in the long run on earth, far from another sun, we are very far from being competent enough to care for life on earth adequately, including ourselves. I could say we are succeeding at doing exactly the contrary, and the uncontrolled environment is a reflection, it could even be possible that we will never gain back stability because we still don't care about life adequately. So I wouldn't be surprised if certain combinations of sickness, animal disappearance and temperature factors could start accelerating our downfall (all life related), like an important spot on earth that would get too windy for bees to do their job, which could trigger a suite of direct and indirect effects that may lead to critical life degeneration, and it is us that would be responsible as we are the only ones that can do something, we are the final extrapolation of life as we know it, and while I don't doubt there could be many other races as capable as us, for as long as they don't exist in a way for people to touch them, even if you took pictures with your telescope in your reality overloaded with manipulators, particularly governments (it's important to believe them (gods), all manipulators and liars want you to believe them blindly, they even wrote it in the bible), then we are the only advanced life in the whole universe; that's our importance. With our ego we can destroy life but with our consciousness and control of ego, we can get life thriving. What do we want to be responsible for? We decide to be what we want...

Now, all this is of no use since those big people seem to know what they're doing with life and they want to be given an eternally repetitive benefit of the doubt so sure they are that they have the best system and know better and got everything under control, and doing their best and all. Even when things get critical, they'll still know what to do in their big meetings of the most powerful gangs, each worth 1000 cars dumped in the ocean. But I'm bad, they represent me after all, they know what to do, and they got experts, scientists and psy sticking all over their ass in knowledge...I may as well close my mouth and not worry...But aren't they the main reason why I'm so much worried, I may as well continue...

There is an ideal scenario of stability for earth, we must learn to keep it, that's part of our job. That's without talking about the possibility of unbelievably powerful environmental cycles that could become so complex and big scientists would crap in their pants understanding the extent! Maybe not, but clouds are cycling things that mainly go in one direction, following a complex order of interrelated cycles, and I have no doubt that a change in one system can grow an insignificant one on the other side of the planet to scary proportions. Everything may seem to be all-right, a little storm or tsunami this way or that, but we are playing with fire; someday we may wake up to cataclysms all over the place as the planet struggle to gain back stability. It's possible that raising temperature could have the contrary effect and stabilize everything but I don't believe that's what will happen, quite the contrary, I believe the earth is a living entity and it came to its stability through many unbelievably difficult steps. We are scraping all that within 100 years, and people don't seem to learn at school that the present is in big part the result of our past actions, and such actions include things we can prevent, stop, even invent, and that science make the reality we live in as much as the ones having the money (the means), science is a mean in itself.

We look as far as we can see, do something then watch the result and readjust, that's how it works. Now, if you do too much big something for profits without watching the results before doing other big something for profits, and do this for things that take 50 years to show evident effects, then you got a recipe for a scientific fiasco of unbelievable proportions, like suddenly dropping all humanity in an environment becoming hostile to them to the point where life's potential becomes very limited.

Science presently is as much a danger as an evolution tool. I'll never say science is evil, they're supposed to have 100 times more means in an adequate reality with good priorities, except for those who are there for the money (lots of them in this reality), but from what I witness of their methodology and how they react when they're wrong while glorifying themselves on TV, and how they're after the money, I'd be very careful of any affirmation about how we should deal with life and the planet. The earth and life is not a laboratory for science to act like gods. There are many examples of science failing to consider itself as a human and living thing with blood and interrelated responsibilities. The knowledge we gain is gained by life, human beings are life results, a history of the solar system developing life. If a profit structure come to you with a stash of money to determine what is the best bee for profit, do you have the intelligence to understand that you're dealing with people, not a banal question asked by a money machine? The company name is bee international; does that ring a bell in your head? Do you need them to wear a tattoo in the forehead saying "we want to sell the best bee for profit all over the world at whatever cost to local populations and diversity, the multi thousand years old bee that have been through life experience can die in the name of a quick profit, but we'll bullshit for the contrary image". A lot of today's scientists are associated and paid by such industries, pharmaceuticals, military, governmental, psychological, they play in everything and half the time the ultimate goal is for someone to make a profit.

Life is all interrelated, everybody do its part, no computer without human responsibility, no gods that manipulate life like its toy, when you manipulate life for profits with your big IQ, maybe it's time to grow something else, like a conscience of your attitude or the strength to defend life physically. Most bosses are big because they're small fearful things, fear have a tendency to give surprising results with out of control ego; even if the effect is quite random; so choose well the tool for fear! But I'm bad, just kill them instead! No, sorry, you're too minded in selective compassion for that, and seeing their dependent family crying will finish you off in nightmares...Anyway I just don't know what I'm saying, life is too precious as a joke, our manipulated, calculated and limited vision of it that say something like; "thou shall kneel before bosses". Did I incite to violence? Got to be careful, so scratch all that, hit them monetarily instead, they'll use violence on you right away if they can, without your afterthought, go to prison to learn some manners, but at least you destroyed the laboratory, maybe even exploded the building or the supply of genetically invincible fuel flowers or birds that pisses gas (I hope I'm not giving ideas to some), but oh!, you're a peaceful green and good scientist developing anthrax spores, violence doesn't exist, have no reasons to exist, violence is the way to prison you know, that's scary eh!

Science of economics? Science of politics? Science of genetics? Are these spheres you closed to most by making these dependent from school studies and an inflated vocabulary, working good and justly? What is the percentage of scientific studies that are wrong or biased? What percentage of research is meant to affect life in a bad way (including manipulating and killing people)? And all these studies get publicized worldwide by newsmen, you can bet they imprint the mind of people, they have an effect civilization wide even if it is not evident, like when they just create conflict with our unconscious. That's what happens when you decorticate everything to a thousand facets for profits and to put it in the controlling hands of ego competitors; the science ends-up serving evil and you lose the global sight in disinformation from people making twisted affirmations. Next you'll make clones for the army? Robot wars then, a good use for these infinite resources...Ah, almost forgot nano-robots will make mountains of gold and humans in 20 years...

Be careful, humanity is starting to look like a failing experiment, maybe when you'll be scared to lose the earth, your laboratory, you'll become a more human, a living, maybe even spiritual thing with a global philosophy of good and evil related to life. But too late for that eh! It's not how it works; you don't change your attitude when it's too late but a long time before that; it's like people who forever make past mistakes, or become saints a few days before getting judged.

I say we have no right to spread in space for as long as we're possessors or conquerors, for as long as we're overwhelmed in our profiting competition, but scientists talk of the moon as their future laboratory, they say it bluntly, is that big an ego enough? Yes we must go in space and on the moon and mars too, everywhere, but maybe we should arrange the mess of the earth laboratory first... We're supposed to like our home, and work in space for the advancement of life, not out of ego reasons or for someone else's profit. The same for satellites, we shouldn't send them out of profiting competition or fun; we're overloading space with cheap satellites for profits, what will it cost to manage the garbage in 50 years? Who will pay for it? And we'll be lucky if all these satellite don't lead to some kind of space frustration war, since in this reality there will always be someone who will try to take control of space, if it's not already done, since the people we vote for hide so many things in their quest to represent the population...And who will make the weapons? Scientists who think their responsibility is to do their job, make experiments whatever people do with it. Next you'll build a permanent scientific mars base you'll keep eternal by always finding an experiment to do? You'll light a light to get seen from everywhere? All this while we finish off the earth to send you supplies and replacement crews every month? You'll want a telescope to observe us next? Observe your failing civilization and record everything from mars? Why don't you use your intelligence to stop wars? No, you'll use it to make more war machines instead, if the pay is good. Why don't you try to truly control the genetic modification you sell to profiting multinationals? No, you'll make more, bigger, vaster, and when everything goes to hell, you'll blame humanity's ways, you're just doing your job.

The solution is to walk the middle line, the line of truth, the line of judgment, the line of consciousness, the line of equilibrium, the just line that reaches far to the end of sight, the line that let you touch both sides with your two hands, the line that let the people go where they want while staying upright globally. But right now that means nothing, we are at a point where we must do something to stop the life degeneration process. And it's not the storms or humidity that kills people, stop the bullshit, it's pollution that is killing people, the environmental problems we have comes from the pollution, from us; people die from the grey city expanses smoke and cars and garbage production they "love" so much to put their possessing hands on.

I'll say that to have a better chance at evading irreversible problems, we will have to resize the competition, exploitation, production, all profitability pyramids to at least half of what they are today or dismantle them altogether. The worldwide population must go down to half of what it is today, minimally, fast. Half of structures, the old stuff, must be recycled and planted with parks, gardens or plantations or new structures that are not made for profits as the main emphasis. The same for a big part of roadways and concrete that should be removed and recycled (cities and asphalt kill almost all life underneath, pollute like crazy, and contribute to heat up the planet). At the worst, old concrete can be used to protect from erosion. But we are doing exactly the contrary while praising Kyoto as the way to go, more and vaster expanses of buildings, more people, more asphalt, more division, competition, exploitation, production etc, etc, etc...GROWTH! Half of pollution must disappear, particularly plastics, chemicals and pharmaceuticals, objects lifetime must double, the petroleum industry must stop expansion, while its use becomes more limited. Mass transportation will have to be systemized free and made more comfortable too; electric trains and ships, mainly.

Old city expanse must be revitalized or replaced by new city principles, those will have to be built under heavy planning, and 3D at that, as much expanded underground as over ground, and they will be considered as a whole living entity, they will be technological and science marvels. It is the end of the accidental city growing from a few farmhouses, an industry and an uncontrolled and encouraged urge to make babies. Villages will stay villages, this colonization attitude overloaded the planet and it is a war mentality. New cities will be built more compact, it's the end of vast expanses of blocks and asphalt to the end of sight, whatever you're completely brainwashed of seeing your neighborhood vision as the best and only one where you can be happy. The power structure for electricity must be modified to permit people to have power generating devices and sell or exchange power. All military powers must be transferred and or stashed for standby use by a global equilibrium structure and all military research and production must be limited to knowledge gathering and production possibility. To finish this, luxury must end. With all that, and more, humanity can keep its potential for a few more hundreds years.

Now, this is ridiculous, but not, that's somewhat what I'll have in mind as I describe the implementation of a new reality later, even if I'll somewhat feel like an incompetent dictator (are there competent one anyway?), since we can't even do one of these things in 50 years... How do you do all that in one shot? By giving birth to another reality altogether. However, from the conclusions I have gained to date, I can hardly believe it can be done from the current state of mind of people.

This was only a small part of my opinion, and no need to tell me I'm crazy, just laugh and listen to your devices and educated people, forget about this and everything will be all right.

You only need to fail at one important thing to be in grave troubles, I cumulated to date maybe a dozen condemnations to a bad way of doing things; that many heads on the hydra you could say, I don't like these things and I'll surely find a few more as I continue writing. Every one of these is a justification for revolt, it doesn't mean the reality is bad, but maybe so when there are many, it minimally means something fundamentally wrong is morphing civilization with time in an inadequate direction, particularly with pressure selection, no choice, we adapt, we tolerate, until genetics eases things.

Some arguments I may have emphasized too much, I explored possibilities too, I'm emotions too, and I'm no scientist or expert, but I think I think I explained my view more than sufficiently. You understand what I wrote about? These things are important, you cannot ignore them and I don't; I explored their possibilities, and sorry if the reality made it so that my judgment took 10 years to form. Now, whatever the condemnations, this reality will not stop functioning poof! No, you get used to it, and it will end through a slow chain reaction, and the chain reaction may have started thousands years ago, time is relative, and some factors can be manipulated and pushed back for a fantastic crash, triggered by absolutely anything. But don't worry; things are always getting better...

And it is not the time to bitch my work for 25 years until it's just some old memory, it is time to make the metamorphosis now, not make hell a final reality, invincible, even if we still must question our responsibilities, our priorities, tolerance and acceptance, our emotional ways too. We'll have to revise our admiration, all these prayers mainly meant to justify wrongs, or that reflected a conflict within us, for a placebo, sure that we're good because there's a religion or sect nearby, like god will distribute gifts because we built "hell" with all your strength instead of fighting it, or adapted, accepted and tolerated. So don't finish yourself off by defending this reality in front of me, I fought for life, you fought for yourself, get away from my sight, I'm trying something different before the potential is lost; will you let me try? I don't want religions, I don't want politicians, I don't want financials, I don't want psy, businessmen, I don't want any defender of this reality to attack me, you already won, why are you frustrated? I want constructive people who want another way super different, who are ready to do something for it, more than that, I want them ready to go to the extent of setting everything on fire if this reality refuses it.

Hard times are coming (sounds like a final truth... worsening then), and the minimal notion to understand to have a little chance at keeping stability to give birth to something better is that everybody will have to do its part for keeping stability, and it includes the rich, and it includes rich women too, not running away to hide in its palace with gold. If they stay in their attitude of profiting and helping for image or popularity gotten from the pressure selection, then we won't be able to keep stability and I'll encourage violence on the ones that don't do their part. And when I say with the help of the rich, I mean the help that don't end-up back in their pockets.

Finally, I know a lot of what I write is depressing, but don't forget that a few thousand years is nothing in the course of infinity, we decide what we make of these years, we are at a turning point, no doubt about it for me, we have experienced a way of things to the maximum of our abilities, "everything" is still possible as long as some life conditions are still met, we can even almost all die in hell and still have a glorious future in a paradise...

Next chapter is very different; it is where I will explore the craziest of universal possibilities, have fun.
