On the topic of logic as your core value,
and using right action mind sets, to fuel your mind:
How do we integrate this belief and way of thinking into society?
Me and Jae, we talked about how preserving the collective organism (which is society) is the only way forward.
But the contrast was made that society is being the tumor of the collective organism,
since it is promoting cancer and I, don't
mean cancer as getting actual tumors in your body,
It's way of expression and labeling, in a way.
It lables how these beliefs and ways of thinking is
doing a harm to our progression as a
species. If you imagine about this:
You're a guard at Auschwitz and you're given the task of killing those Jews.
Would you kill them? And why wouldn't you kill them if you wouldn't?
If one says "I wouldn't because I would feel bad", then the next question is:
Would you do it if you wouldn't feel bad?and a
person who does not understand right
A person who does not understand right action would say "Okay, I don't care, probably."
But if you understood right action - that you should always do what is right, even without your emotions where your coding is like  a psycopath -
You would not ever do that.
You would never kill the Jew if you were in the Auschwitz soldier's shoes.
Why? Because you know that's wrong,
and even if you don't give a crap,
- you wouldn't feel regret, you wouldn't feel compassion, you wouldn't feel anything -
You still wouldn't do it because you know that's wrong on this
basic level. Why is it wrong? 
Whoa, you know that's a good question.
I thought about it because I didn't have
the answer (at least I didn't understand
it but I did not have the answer to back
it up). So, the answer to this is actually
very simple. It's very basic when you think about it.
If you kill the Jew, if you kill somebody, a person who doesn't deserve death in any way because they are notmalicious,
then... killing that person is harming the collective organism
Which is society. Okay? Following me?
When is it okay to kill a person which would not harm but but would benefit the collective organism?
We shouldn't think of it as a subjective thing. It should be objective and backed up by a statistic.
So when is it okay to kill a person?
It is when they are causing harm, intentionally or otherwise.
Why is it okay to kill that person?
Isn't ethics going to back this up? Fook ethics!
Philosophy? Fook that. It's about
consistency and logic.
If the cells in your body started revolting, what would happen? Chaos.
If you have cancer, what would happen? You would start dying from the inside out (or from you know depending on which type of cancer it is)
So having these people in society which are causing problems - killing people, robbing people...
You know, of course, if somebody steals you can't just kill them, you can fix them by showing them the way,
but if you cannot stop the people that are causing the cancer in society,
with anything but physical force,
then it is consistent for those people to die - if there is no other way.
If there is no other way, you must attack the cancer, the cancer in society, with any means necessary.
But if you can fix - you know, actually recondition this cancer in to turning into healthy cells of the society -
Then... sure!
So, this is the example as to when killing is acceptable.
It is not acceptable because, "Ugh, that's what history has shown us," or because "You cannot kill people..."
Or, you know, when somebody would say: "Urhm, you cannot kill people because that is not acceptable by ethics."
Shut the fook up.
If you cannot stop somebody killing other people with words, then you gotta lock him.
If you can't knock him up because he or
she are too dangerous you fooking kill him or her.
If the canswer is spreading, you need to stop it. How do we define this cancer? It's malicious intent.
Murderers.
Ppretty much it's actually murderous
ecause murderers really do the biggest damage
in any society. And we're talking
about wars as well, people who are in
charge of countries and promote war:
they should be stripped of all power and
if they continue causing harm, it's best
for them to be imprisoned, isn't it.
And if they continued causing harm, maybe that person is very problematic and
needs to be dealt with extremely. So
there are many aspects there are no
absolutes in this way of thinking, but
using consistency and doing right,
having that right action mindset will get you anywhere
you could just logic your way into any
situation and be sure of your decision.
It can help you tremendously.
That's pretty much it.
Right action...
destroyed the tumour of societ. There is
also a problem though, that society, in a way promotes cancer.
We've got to be better than everybody
else, you got to earn that money, you got
to have that status, you got to have that
individuality...
And that creates issues. "I'm better than you, I have more than you, I know more than you,
"you're lesser, you are cheap, you are
poor, you are an idiot,
"you are ugly."
That's what society promotes us to do.
In school, they tell us your peers, you know, your classmates...
"Oh, they're gonna be better because your scores are lesser, so you're not gonna get into uni or college,
"They're gonna get in before you, so you have to grind so you get better marks."
Shut up.
You are an idiot, you are a cause to the cancer of selfishness. Don't you get?
But they don't get it, they think that's how it works because
they do not know better, these people,
that the old people, the older generations...
Old people are relics.
they really don't know better.
Sure, they have knowledge, but in terms
of progressive knowledge, in terms of
psychology, they are just...
not many are wise.
They may have what to say as insights, but old people are pretty much bias machines. Prejudiced.
They think they know, but...
All I've heard from those that are older
than me is selfishness.
It's always about making it about you, 
always, even if I'm from a communist country,
where it was about the socialism, it's again the individual. You-you-you.
And that's wrong. It makes you depressed. Why do you think doomers exist, huh?
Why do you think people kill themselves?
Why do you think you're so privileged, and yet you think you have nothing, like you are nothing?
You have everything.
A roof... water... food... no wars...
And yet you're being a little crying
youch. Why is that?
why are you depressed?
It's because you believe you matter,
that it's all about you.
If, for a second, you stopped believing that it's all about you and just made life about 'what's right'...
I'm not gonna tell you: "Make life about other people!", "Make life about the collective organism!"
Fook that. That's going to be the symptom of you doing what's right.
If you just try to do what's right
everything else would come automatically,
because you no good doing this is right
and it's not because you subjectively
believe, it it's because it is proved:
it's proven by logic and consistency because you know that if you help somebody else,
the collective organism it's gonna prosper.
You know that if you don't do harm the collective organism is going to prosper.
You know that when you help, the collective organism is going to prosper.
You know that if you enlighten other people, the collective organism is going to prosper. You understand that and
When you stop doing it, stomp making life
about yourself, you just...
You just feel full.
You feel like the world beautiful again, there's so much new stuff, there's so much things to
understand and so many people to show
the lights to. See it as religion if you want.
It's similar because religion is beliefs; this is a belief.
It's one to one. There is no difference.
The only difference is these insights
truly are aligned with the paradigm of reality.
To do some good for yourself, and start thinking critically.
Start being consistent with life.
Markovas, signing out.
