The American Association of Pediatricians
issued a request this week, calling for the
nationwide elimination of non-medical vaccine
exemptions for school entry.
Because of California's recent obsession with
becoming the North Korea of the West, I thought
it might be interesting to take a look at
this paper and its implications.
How long can they make it before mentioning
the Disney Measles Outbreak?
How long can they make it before mentioning
herd immunity?
The tension is killing me!
The American Association of Pediatricians
is kind of like MySpace for Doctors.
Maybe you created an account with them long
ago, and maybe they update things every now
and then, but besides the logo you can put
on your business card and the free magnetic
calendar on your vaccine fridge, they really
aren't that relevant.
But the news media, like robots will relay
what they say, so we have to dissect their
hysterical ravings.
The article begins, "While the Academy has
opposed nonmedical or "personal belief" exemptions
in the past, this is the first policy statement
on the issue."
I like how they quote that personal belief-
it's like saying Velveeta (my favorite food
product on the planet) is "Cheese".
Personal belief might mean you have spent
months researching vaccine safety and efficacy,
have researched your family history, done
genetic testing on your kids and come to the
conclusion that you do not need to spin the wheel
with vaccines and your child.
They oppose that.
Because they studied vaccines for about 2
hours in medical school, and are going to
spend 8 minutes with you and your kid at any
given time, they know what's best for your
child.
Not you.
Yeah.
Good luck with your vaccines!
They go on, "The Academy supports medically
indicated exemptions but says nonmedical exemptions
are inappropriate for individual, public health
and ethical reasons.
To protect those who cannot be vaccinated,
community or “herd” immunity (There it
is!) requires at least 90% of the population
to be immunized (95% for highly contagious
diseases such as measles and pertussis)."
If you're new around here, the idiots at the
wheel of your children's health will tout
herd immunity as a fragile construct protecting
the vulnerable, a gossamer edifice which hinges
upon at least 95% of the population being
immunized.
Just know that number started at 55% long
ago, and ever since then, they've had to raise
it every few years when things don't Pan out
like they had hoped.
If they can hit 100%, don’t worry, the outbreaks,
or "Parties" as we used to call them, will
still happen and they can call everyone under-immunized.
So your kids 5 DTaP shots, will become 7,
then 8 then 9, and your teenager's college
MMR booster, will be their Freshman, Sophomore,
Junior and Senior year MMR shots.
Don't worry, vaccines are completely safe
and effect… well they're effective at some
theoretical point in the future.
We think.
We'll get there one day.
Anyway, here's what I wanted to point out,
something interesting about these ridiculous
articles.
They ALWAYS point to herd immunity as a reason
EVERYONE needs to be immunized that can, but
they NEVER show any concern for those poor
kids whose parents don't want their kids to
get vaccinated.
You can read article after article, and the
medical professionals always put on their
halos and say, what about the immune-compromised
who can't be vaccinated?
I want to know, what about the kids who don't
get vaccinated ON PURPOSE?
Why don't they have any concern for these
kids?
With Personal Belief Exemptions reaching as
high as 60-70% in wealthy Los Angeles schools,
why aren't they terrified for the health and
safety of THESE poor, helpless children?
60-70% percent means there are many, many
more vulnerable unvaccinated children than
immune-compromised children- why is that not
a huge concern?
Could it be, they're angry at the parents
of these kids and don't want to give them
their sympathy?
Could it be it distracts from their herd immunity
halos?
Or could it be they realize these parents
have done their research and have realized
the vaccines pose more of a danger than the
diseases themselves?
Maybe they won't just say that outright, but
I think that might be what's going on.
That's why they never mention these children
in their pleas.
They know these children will be fine.
Their parents are educated on these issues,
know when to recognize sickness, know when
to keep their children home, and know how
to treat them.
Those parents, are clearly Enemies of the
State, would you not say?
Here's what they're thinking though: "We want to save them!
Not You!"
That's in effect what these articles say to
me.
"Let us save them!"
Yes, I attended acting school in case you're
wondering.
That's how I'm able to do that.
Ok, we're 4 paragraphs in and have only herd
immunity.
Where's the Disney?
"In late 2014 to early 2015, a large measles
outbreak linked to a Disneyland park in California
highlighted the dangers of unvaccinated children."
And marijuana.
And robot attacks.
And talking to strangers.
And looking at microwaves or talking on a
cel phone during a thunderstorm.
Highlighted the dangers?
What were the dangers?
What happened?
55% of the people in California were vaccinated
for measles?
What happened to them?
The same thing that happened to the other
people.
They got a fever.
The unvaccinated got rashes so they knew to
quarantine themselves.
They vaccinated didn't get the rashes and
so they waltzed around Mickey's Fun Wheel
and The Little Mermaid for the next two weeks
infecting everyone everywhere they went.
I can't believe the amount of mileage the
always afraid, perpetually panicked health
officials have gotten out of the Disney Measles
thing.
It blows my mind.
No one died.
No one was permanently injured.
They all got better.
The unvaccinated ones now have lifetime immunity
and never have to worry about Measles again.
The vaccinated will still need to keep getting
boosters for the rest of their life.
Hello, AAP!
Are you listening.
This event highlighted nothing dangerous other
than a lifetime of risk associated with depending
on a lifetime of vaccine-induced protection
every few years.
The doctor drops another halo: “I personally
— as well as colleagues around the country
— have received calls from parents whose
children were immunocompromised … who were
really concerned."
Really concerned?
Is that all you can do?
Considering how much of your yearly budget
is spent on generating panic and fear, shouldn't
they be more than concerned?
You are the Titans of Terror after all, so
I'd consider your association a complete failure
if parents weren't calling you at least afraid.
Isn't that what you want?
Again, no concern for the thousands of kids
whose educated, affluent idiot parents decide
to skip vaccines.
I just don't get it.
An author of the policy states, “AAP policy
is very helpful to pediatricians at a state
and local level to advocate for children’s
health.
I anticipate — and hope — that this statement
will be used far and wide for that purpose."
Sounds so innocent.
So well-intentioned, doesn't it.
This will be one of those papers where you
go back and look at 30 or 40 years from now
and shiver.
How could we be so blind, you will say.
They actually thought they were promoting
health!
We'll shake our heads with the incredible
ignorance displayed by those at the highest
levels of office.
This article goes on for a bit, but I need
to cut to the chase.
I hope you can see that this is getting worse.
The AAP is pushing HARD for North Korean style
medical systems in EVERY state in the US.
They've got California, West Virginia and
Mississippi so far.
These 3 states have made personal or philosophical
exemptions meaningless for parents.
Your children are wards of the state.
You pay for their room and board, but otherwise
they're in control.
Here's my question- do you think this will
get better, or do you think it will get worse?
Do you think they might over a few years want
a little more control over your kids?
I can just see the letter sent home from kindergarten:
Your son has been diagnosed by the school
psychiatrist with ADD, and we have been made
aware by local health officials he is not
receiving any medication for it.
He is a distraction to the classroom and is
negatively affecting the learning experience
of those around him, especially others with
short term attention spans.
Here is the medication we will be giving him.
Let us know if you have any concerns.
That will never happen, right?
Is it really so far-fetched?
I'm sure some of you watching this video right now may have had something similar,
And I'd love to hear about it.
What do you know about your child's mental
health? they might say.
You didn't go to school for that.
Trust your health officials- we know what's
best for your child.
And we have just the thing for him.
And this is all school-related stuff.
It won't be just schools for long.
Currently, those who can afford to home-school
can dodge the vaccine bullets for now, but
I can guarantee Dr. Pan in California is quivering
with fear in his office right now about the
death and disease home schoolers may bring
upon the great state of California.
"How can we stop them?!"
he's probably screaming to himself.
I'm sure lawmakers will come up with something
good to fix that problem.
I hope that this AAP paper gives you a crystal
clear idea of where things are headed.
I hope that it gets you off your phone and
into your local and state representative's
office and let them know how you and all the
thousands of other parents out there feel
about mandatory vaccines.
They've got three states already, and more
are on the way.
Say something now, before you have a bigger
fight on your hands.
And that is my incredible opinion.
