another horrible story relating to
women's rights is that a pharmacist in
idaho which now has a rule that allows
its called a conscience clause which
allows pharmacist adjust not fill a
prescription if they don't believe it or
rather
specifically for emergency
contraceptives and uh... it's so-called
abortion pills
if they have a problem with that because
conscious doesn't allow absolutely
insane
he wasn't
after the sports story we did on last
show about the the philadelphia abortion
doctor and other heinous things he did
too
then late term abortions
they've really became clear to me i
really hate abortion i really really do
i believe it should be legal and what
the story
pro-life what is pro-life in this case a
walgreens pharmacist didn't give a girl
a medication for you here in bleeding
what is pro-life because she's too spec
that it may have been the result of an
abortion but she didn't agree with
what's pro-life about giving not
withholding medication that could save
someone's life
and the hypocrisy of is that when we
hear the pro-life sentiment cited for
being against abortion
and wanting to
avail yourself of this conscience
clauses a pharmacist
letting a woman bleed out because he
refers refused to fill her prescription
because u_n_ bird she may have had an
abortion or we could go on all day about
their proper see these idiots but part
of this legislation that passed
that's the craziest thing here
it's a little asian
i don't know i can say
the the other thing is this the
pharmacist actually called
that nurse
at the office for the prescribed this
yeutter in bleeding
drug
prevention drug that is and send it back
to the nurse why did you prescribe this
in the nurse said
i don't have to tell you that that
violates confidentiality
for missus hangs up says and i continue
this discussion
and the problem is
far bigger ladies and gentlemen
then this one anti-choice pharmacists
right
it is both ridiculous
an incredibly dangerous to allow women's
medical medical care to be at the whim
of a walgreens pharmacist who is
anti-choice
we are planning people's health care
are we putting on the line
based on the
i don't know
social political religious whims of all
the wallet walgreens pharmacist in idaho
we cannot have loan pharmacist denying
prescriptions the people that have
obtained them properly
the pharmacist
also i'm getting emails from women
saying
the pharmacist is an embarrassment to
women
how dare she put another woman's life in
danger
by denying her and people eating
medication and all of these are
brilliant points
my understanding is that this is a
violation of the law as it is anyway
whether you agree with it or not the
love the law allows a pharmacist to
refuse birth control of any kind
and they can destroy refused to
distribute the morning-after pill
it does not say
that you can refuse medications
even if we didn't know if this is to
level with his two levels of of insanity
even if she knew
that this believing was the result of an
abortion
you cannot withhold medication due to
complications of abortions or using
birth control
there was not even proof that that was
the case
so this is that this is a complete
failure it is a complete perversion of
the law in any case
we think about it what if a pharmacist
refused to give someone antibiotics
because they thought
you know
you are more prone to summon biff
infections
in the period after having an abortion
so i'm not going to give you antibiotics
for that sinus infection
it's a perversion of the law
this needs to be changed
we cannot be at the whim of
individual pharmacists
for the care of hundreds of thousands of
people
with valid prescriptions
there's just not the pharmacist place to
he deciding
it does not mean how does that even fall
into the courting dil according to that
others passed that's why it's so crazy
it is the problem
that is the problem and then we'll take
a break speaking of pro-life
the michigan messenger is reporting that
gave gina
who's a republican congressman from
granville michigan he is now introducing
legislation to eliminate the michigan
health fund initiative it would shift
nine million dollars
away from that for the michigan
aeronautics fund
what would have been
research with that nine million dollars
in great part
h_i_v_ funding virtually all
michigan
funding for h_i_v_ research is part of
this nine million dollars
talk about pro-life
clearly aeronautics is more important
apparently to david yuma
it's very sad lewis what is going on
with health care in this country has we
talked about
public options how could they start
we need to start looking into that quick
especially at the state level will be
back after this
david adventure david padma dot com
