Every specific science has its own language,
its own particular language. Suppose chemistry
valid chemical language, physics a physical
language, mathematics a mathematical language.
A philosophy can use scientific language and
everyday simple language. Sometimes the proverb
reveals such wise things in simple language
that the entire volume of works will 
not disclose this idea.
The philosophy canalso use art language, the language of art images.
For example, the tale about the old man, the old woman and the goldfish. Whatis it about? I think this is a great philosophical work.
Karl Marx wrote four volumes of capital
and said that human being creates a society
where all people are equal. The needs of people
will be limited. Everyone will want what he can have.
Pushkin wrote the little tale about
the old man, the old woman and the goldfish.
And show that this will not happen ever. Because
old lady - a character of mankind.
People will always be willing to to desire, yet not
remain with nothing.
So, you see, simply known fairy tales, which reveal the serious things.
Or here's a tale about a Bun.
Everyone knows it since childhood. What is this tale about? Bun wanted freedom, the bun is already free.
Further what, how it's all over? They ate
a Bun. Who villain? A Fox. But, in fact, a
negative character in this tale bun. Because
he did not know the difference between the
will and freedom. It is no accident say in
the criminal world, "You`ll never see the
will" and not "you`ll never see the freedom".
Because there is a difference between the
will and freedom. As in English there are
the concepts of freedom and the concept of liberty.
Freedom is a physical freedom; when
the person is physically closed, his freedom is limited.
A liberty - is political freedom.
Here Bun did not know what he wants; he knew what he didn’t want.
He said: "I left my
grandmother, I left my grandfather".
And wherever he goes, he did not know. They say: "any windcannot be incidental to the ship that does
not know what harbor he making his way to."
That is, if you do not know what you want,  what you do not want is not freedom.
That's
just the same science differentiate the negative
freedom from the positive freedom. Positive
freedom is when you know what for. Here in
the work of Nietzsche Zarathustra says: "From
what the freedom is? What matters to this,
Zarathustra, you tell me what freedom is,
and then I will know who you are. What do you want?
Here Bun and did not know he could
never find. Do not blame the fox that he died,
he is guilty because he does not know what
he wants. This is a problem of many people
who know what they do not want, but do not
know what they want. Here the philosophy it
should reveal precisely the essence of positive
freedom. Here you can see a lot of tales where
the philosophy reveals deep problems by the
language of art images. Let "The Ugly Duckling"
by Anderson, or take Dostoevsky's "Crime and
Punishment". This philosophy expressed in art form.
Not by chance, Albert Camus wrote
that if you want to be a philosopher in the
20th century, write the novels. Other words
what everybody reads and what comes to an ordinary person to the heart.
But on the other
hand Camus also says that the philosophy is
a modern form of shamelessness. How do you
understand it? What is the modern form of shamelessness means?
Here hence a philosophy
of the matrix, which uses some sort of concepts
which generates its own language, which is
read and do not understand anything.
Here is a form of shamelessness. When it is necessary
to prove with the using of philosophy.
When philosophy is used for ideological purposes.
Similarly, religion is used for ideological purposes.
Some people have formed a negative
position toward religion, because religion
is turns to means of ideology. But it is not
its fault, but the one who uses it. Likewisea philosophy.
It may be light, but it can
be used as a means of subtraction of this light
and the creation of darkness.
