In October 1917, in wartime Petrograd, Russian
radicals known as the Bolsheviks carried out
“the Great October Socialist Revolution.”
On the night of October 24, Bolshevik Red
Guards began to take control of key points
in the Russian capital—railway stations,
telegraph offices, and government buildings.
By the following evening, they controlled
the entire city with the exception of the
Winter Palace, the seat of the Provisional
Government.
This government had ruled Russia since Tsar
Nicholas II’s abdication  the preceding
February, but it had lost almost all support
as casualties from Russia’s horrific World
War I continued to mount.
In fact, at this crucial moment Provisional
Government ministers could find almost no
one willing to defend them.
That night, Bolshevik Red Guards broke into
the palace and arrested the ministers, bringing
the Provisional Government to an end.
The “storming of the Winter Palace” has
gone down in history as the climactic moment
of the October Revolution.
But overthrowing the existing government turned
out to be the easy part.
Over the next three years, the Bolsheviks
(soon renamed Communists) would have to win
power in a bloody civil war and reestablish
order in a country that had descended into
anarchy.
For both opponents and supporters, the October
Revolution represented the advent of socialism.
Those on the political right saw socialism
as a scourge that entailed the violent expropriation
of private property and the trampling of individual
liberties.
And throughout the twentieth century, Soviet
socialism continued to be seen as an existential
threat to liberal democracy and capitalism.
But many on the left welcomed the Revolution
as the start of a new era, with harmony and
equality for all people.
Particularly given the senseless slaughter
of millions of soldiers during the First World
War, the October Revolution seemed to offer
an alternative—a government ruled in the
interests of the common people that would
ultimately produce a communist utopia.
More than a century later, the October Revolution
still stands as a seminal event in world history.
But no longer can it be seen in Marxist terms
as part of the inevitable progression from
feudalism to capitalism to socialism to communism.
Instead, the Revolution today is often viewed
as a cautionary tale about the dangers of
socialist ideology.
According to this thinking, the socialist
ideas pursued by Communist Party leaders led
to the crimes of Stalinism, which produced
neither equality nor harmony but left millions
of people dead.
With the collapse of the Communist regime
in 1991, the anniversary of the October Revolution
is no longer celebrated in Russia.
Many people regard the entire Soviet epoch
as a tragedy, the result of socialist thought
put into practice.
Was the Soviet regime really a product of
socialist ideology?
In some ways it was.
Vladimir Lenin and other Communist Party leaders
were committed to Marxism, one branch of socialism,
and they understood the world in terms of
class categories.
[In Russian:] “The nature of this power,
which is attracting larger and larger numbers
of workers in every country, is the following:
in the past the country was, in one way or
another, governed by the rich, or by the capitalists,
but now, for the first time, the country is
being governed by the classes, and moreover,
by the masses of those classes, which capitalism
formerly oppressed.” [– Vladimir Lenin]
Their policies included violent expropriation
of private property and class warfare.
But Marxist thought provided no blueprint
for constructing a socialist state.
Most of Karl Marx’s writings had been a
critique of capitalism, and he described the
socialist future only in vague terms.
Nowhere did he outline what became the fundamental
institutions of the Soviet state—
a fully state-run, planned economy; government bureaucracies for censorship and propaganda;
the secret police and its system of surveillance; and
the network of forced labor camps known as
the Gulag.
These institutions were instead based upon
wartime practices of the First World War and
the Russian Civil War.
Combatant countries throughout Europe during
the First World War had increased state control
over their economies, through price controls,
rationing, production quotas, and grain requisitioning.
They had utilized censorship and propaganda
to maintain soldiers’ and citizens’ morale.
The governments of all combatant countries
also had engaged in widespread surveillance
of their citizens.
And in addition, they had created concentration
camps to intern “enemy aliens” and, in
some cases, their own subjects during the
war.
After the October Revolution, Communist leaders
used all of these methods to fight the Civil
War and establish control over the far-flung
Russian empire.
Unlike in other countries, where governments
stepped back from total war practices after
the war ended, the Soviet state was formed
in conditions of anarchy and civil war, and
these practices became institutionalized as
permanent features of governance.
The October Revolution, then, produced a highly
militarized version of socialism, one in which
state control and violence became fundamental
components.
While Marxist ideas and categories shaped
Communist policies, the Soviet state cannot
be divorced from the historical moment in
which it arose—a moment of total war.
In the 1930s, Soviet state violence became
even more pervasive, as Joseph Stalin sought
to prepare the Soviet Union for the next war.
Wartime practices such as grain requisitions
and deportations were used to collectivize agriculture.
The Soviet planned economy, essentially a
wartime economy, marshaled labor and raw materials
for enormous industrial projects that modernized
the country.
During the Second World War, the Stalinist
leadership relied on these same institutions
of state violence and control to mobilize
vast human and material resources for the war effort.
Both Stalinist industrialization and victory
over Nazi Germany, however, were obtained
at tremendous cost.
During the 1930s, several million Soviet citizens
died due to famines, deportations, and executions.
An estimated 27 million more died during the
Second World War.
Even after the war, the Stalinist government
continued large-scale deportations and incarcerations
of its own citizens.
In the end, the Soviet state’s legacy of
coercion and bloodshed proved to be its undoing.
When Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev lifted
censorship in the 1980s, discussion of the
system’s violent past quickly undercut its
legitimacy.
By 1991, Communist rule had ended and the
Soviet Union disintegrated.
The October Revolution shaped the twentieth-century world arguably more than any other single event.
It brought to power a new regime, one that
ruled in the name of the working class and
that established a non-capitalist, state-run
economy.
This regime carried out a brutal industrialization
drive that enabled the Soviet Union to play
the leading role in defeating Nazi Germany
and winning World War II.
And the existence of the Soviet Union also
led to the Cold War, the superpower confrontation
with the United States that dominated world
affairs for the entire postwar era.
The October Revolution did not, however, mark
a new stage in history or humankind’s inevitable
progression towards a communist utopia.
And the Soviet system that resulted from it,
while socialist in some respects, was characterized
by institutions of government control and
state violence.
More than a century after the October Revolution,
we can see that above all else the Soviet
state reflected the era of mass warfare in
which it arose.
