

Arseniy Sobolevskiy

## Self-destruction of Europe

In lieu of epigraph

Modern Europe is threatened to suffer the fate of Ancient Rome, which went through demographic decline and eventually fell under the onslaught of barbarians.

Europe is now like a lady with slashed veins, lying in a warm bath of blood. She feels pleasantly comfortable. She is dying quietly; as if she were falling asleep...

Will we watch her calmly perish or take action for the sake of her salvation?

The author of the book

The main themes of the book: demented consumption and progressive degradation of society, demographic catastrophe and the threat of ethnic degeneration of Europe, crisis of the family and Christian Church, history of sexual revolution and sexual culture, a creeping ethnic war and love as a weapon. The book deals with the most acute problems of our civilization and offers real and bold solutions. The author supports his conclusions with the opinions of famous scientists, politicians and ordinary people. This book contains an anti-terrorist message and opposes the radical ideas of hatred with radical ideas of love.

The book was translated by Natalya Vasenina (Russia)

The editors of the first part of the book are

Catherine Tichoux and Alexandra Mandich (Canada)

In the first Russian version the book is called «Revolution of love or degeneration?»

This is a new edition of the book with a new name and important supplements in the 3 rd , 5th and 10th chapters.

© «ISKIS», 2014

© Arseniy Sobolevskiy, 2014

Published by Arseniy Sobolevskiy at Smashwords

### Contents

Introduction

Part 1. THREAT OF DEGENERATION

Chapter 1. The epidemic of consumer idiotism

The mechanism of self-destruction * Advertising as a tool of ideology * Falling into the abyss * Consequences of the wild race * Radical changes are needed

Chapter 2. Demographic catastrophe

Europeans are dying out * How we are distroying our future * Reverse expansion * Lessons from European history * A world-scale tragedy

Chapter 3. The progressive degradation

Historical analogy * Intellectual decline * Shopkeepers are ruling now, not aristocrats... * Anti-culture and anti-harmony * People have become worse than beasts

Chapter 4. Crisis within the Christian church

Deserted temples * The forgotten kingdom of love * Why Islam is setting in

Chapter 5. The new vector of development

A planet of idiots? * Greed has won over the Reason * Criteria of progress * The strategy of reasonable development

Part 2. SEX, FAMILY AND DEMOGRAPHY

Chapter 6. The first sexual revolution

Socialization of women * Love and sexual communism * Sexual freedom –to people! * Get rid of shame! * Commune instead of the family * Sexual counterrevolution * The key issue

Chapter 7. Eros and Civilization

The League of sexual reforms * American studies and experiments * The second sexual revolution * Sexual education and sexual culture * Pornography as a mirror of morality

Chapter 8. The thirst for love and sexual hunger

The phenomenon of love * Love and sex * Sex and health * Sexual discrimination of the youth * Non-traditional relationships * Is prostitution immortal? * The era of masturbation

Chapter 9. The crisis of the family

The history of marriage * The problem of acquaintance and harmony * The war of sexes * Parents and children * Love and faithfulness * New forms

Chapter 10. Revolution of love and ethnic war

Lies, love and economics * The Golden age after the Apocalypse * A creeping ethnic war * Freedom to young love! * The family commune * The role of Russia * The world reason instead of the world government

Afterword

###  Introduction

Today the world's attention is focused on the economic crisis, but in the future the crisis of the family is much more dangerous for Europe. The demographic catastrophe inevitably leads to ethnic degeneration of the peoples who founded modern civilization. Why is the world community more concerned about the decline in the population of polar bears and tigers, than decline in the population of white people, which is not less catastrophic, is it?

In the development of economics we are choosing the path leading our civilization to self-destruction. The crisis of the family is imposed by the crisis of Christian church and degradation in many spheres. We need to change the vector of development. The world must be ruled by love and reason, not by greed and malice. We will never defeat terrorism by police methods alone. It is necessary to oppose ideas of hatred with more appealing ideas of love.

We need radical changes in relationships between men and women in order to solve demographic problems successfully. Native European peoples must strive to increase their birth rates much more than focusing on the growth of stock exchange indices and incredible wasteful consumption. As everyone knows, only love defines real happiness, not money.
Part one

### THREAT OF DEGENERATION

Chapter 1.

###  The epidemic of consumer idiotism

The mechanism of self-destruction * Advertising as a tool of ideology * Falling into the abyss * Consequences of the wild race * Radical changes are needed *

###  The mechanism of self-destruction

The mechanism of self-destruction of our civilization has already been launched. To stop it, we need to realize where and why we are moving. Earlier, over the past centuries people have longed for some bright ideals. The modern world seems to have forgotten about the ideals of long ago. Instead there is a dull, almost animal desire for reckless consumption.

The mankind is infected by the Epidemic of Consumer Idiotism. - ECI. Globalization spreads it all over the world. In today's world post-industrial society doesn't consume to live, but lives in order to consume. The more so, not just to consume, but to overconsume, to devour goods and resources with insane extravagance beyond all reasonable limits of renewal potential of our rapidly destroyed ecosystem. People of developed countries throw away quite good things to the rubbish dump with a light heart, though these things could serve their grandparents for a long time. We just do not have wise attitude to life.

«We don't live to eat, but we eat to live»

Socrates, philosopher of Ancient Greece

The United States of America is considered to be the most modern civilization, largely defining living standards of the whole world. Inhabitants of many other countries dream of being as wealthy as they are, and having the same level of consumption. But is it really possible? Americans, composing only 5% of the population of the globe consume 23% of all energy, 25% of all extracted oil, eat up 15% of produced meat and own 37% of all cars.

Scientists have already calculated that to ensure the same level of consumption for all of mankind on Earth would require nearly five such planets. But where can we take them? It's absolutely obvious that American appetites are much higher than the potential of our ecosystem, and the «American dream», which so many people strive for, is a very dangerous chimera capable of ruining the whole world! Only a huge gap between rich and poor countries keeps our civilization away from ecological disaster. Nowadays, the index of consumption of the «golden billion » in developed countries is 32, compared to ONE in many developing countries.

Reckless losses

Every year about 1.3 billion tons of foodstuffs are lost or just thrown away, which is a third of all food produced in the world. In developing countries the losses occur due to bad infrastructure, outdated storing and processing technology. But, as it turns out, the greatest loss of food is not in developing countries but rather in developed countries. Much more food is thrown away there. Millions of tons of food products are sent to garbage containers every year.

From the report of the Swedish Institute of Food and Biotechnology

The most outstanding demonstration of ECI is shopomania or shopogolizm – an obsessive desire to shop in immense quantities. Billions of dollars are spent to purchase superfluous or totally unnecessary products and things. The American Psychological Association has recognized this syndrome as a disease. In the USA alone about 15 million people are prone to it and 55 million more are on the verge of addiction. . In Great Britain up to 10% of adults suffer from this obsessive craving to shops. In Great Britain up to 10% of adults suffer from this obsessive craving to shops. 52% of English women confessed that they enjoy shopping more than sex! People start preferring artificial stimulation to natural enjoyments. In a similar way, experimental mice lose the instinct of self-preservation and reproduction when their nervous system becomes accustomed to strong visual and taste stimulants.

The art of seduction

«In the era of market relations demand is initiated artificially. Advertisement, which is called the engine of trade, virtually places human emotionality on the hook of consumption. Nowadays sales of goods are not just a simple and unsophisticated act of passing from hand to hand; but it is a constantly improving art of seduction of consumers. »

Evgeniy Kovalev, «Planet psychology »

Imposed desires

« In this respect modern people differ very little from laboratory mice. Under the pressure of aggressive advertisement our natural necessities are substituted by imposed desires.

As a result a person often loses adequate perception of what he really needs and uncontrolled consumption is switched on. It keeps the nervous system in a wrought-up state. Hyper stimulation becomes a drug for the mind, and natural stimuli cease to cause a reaction.

Instead of natural and moderate people often unconsciously choose overabundant and even harmful things. They prefer fast food to natural food, television to close and personal communication to people, pornography – to real sex. Distribution of X-rated movies replaces the natural need to find a partner and undermines the instinct of reproduction.

All these stimuli are infiltrating to our life quite deliberately. They give an impetus to the thing, to which our nature is already addicted, - to overconsumption.

...We are puppets subjected to the destructive influence of advertising for excessive consumption. We can resist the dangerous trend only with the help of a centralized state program. »

Deirdre Barrett, psychologist, Harvard Medical School

The American psychologist suggests a reasonable solution, however, leaders, who are under the strong influence of big business, do not hear it. There is no such centralized state program anywhere yet.

###  Advertising as a tool of ideology

Today advertising is the main tool of the World Ideology of Overconsumption. It is especially noticeable in Russia. If in Soviet times there were posters in the main streets of Moscow glorifying the Communist Party, now they are imposing leading world brands. Moreover they are doing it with an incredible never- before- seen scale. Advertising banners of huge sizes now cover entire facades of immense multi-story buildings! It seems that only the Kremlin towers are not wrapped in them. Perhaps this is yet to come...

We are being manipulated

«...We are being manipulated, we are being cheated! People have been converted into tools of purchase. The majority of people are being brainwashed and controlled. We live for the market; it dictates when we work and when we rest. The market imposes us what to do. We are not free people. Journalists must inform people about it. But mass media keeps silent about it. Television tells us 24 hours a day that we need to buy things, that our purchasing power is our scale of values. In truth modern television content contains less than 8% real information; all the rest is advertising. All the rest is advertising and entertainment. As a result, this 92% is hugely important in the formation of personality.

Juliet Chiesa, Italian journalist, from an interview to ROSBALT

Mad commercial advertising turns out to be much more intrusive than communist propaganda. Programs of the Soviet television were not interrupted as often by advertising clips of the CPSU. Now films and programs are frequently interrupted at the most interesting moments only with intention to persuade TV viewers to buy a super modern gel for cleaning toilets or feminine hygiene products, which are not usually discussed outloud by most people. Advertising follows us everywhere at every step. In the street – everywhere you can look. The same situation is in transport. We open a mailbox and a pile of intrusive waste paper falls out of it. At home we turn on the television and get a «dose» every 20 minutes.

But the most cynical thing is that all this expensive madness is paid for from our own pocket! The cost of advertising in the sale price of new goods sometimes reaches 50 %! It means that we are being tormented at our money! If we refused advertising, goods and food would be much cheaper. Besides, we could free enormous creative power, which is now wasted when talents are exchanged on a coin making one-day advertising butterflies. Advertising is pressing and stifling high art and literature. In fact it leads to cultural degradation of society. Today potential Dostoevskiys and Tolstoys don't write thick novels but work in advertising agencies. Because there they are paid much more than in publishing companies. Talented people help impose on us harmful things for big money in a clever way. One of the best examples of this is the advertising of Marlboro cigarettes. In its time the company - Philip Morris increased the volume of sales by 300 % thanks to the image of a macho cowboy.

Advertising promotes not only insanely wasteful consumption and an unjustified increase in prices, but also puts the producers in unequal conditions. It often happens that an average quality product or even a bad product is imposed on consumers and sold successfully, while a much better product cannot find its buyer only because the producer invested all the money in quality and is unable to pay for expensive advertising. Often the products are imposed on us as the best, but they really leave much to be desired. Brainwashing by advertising propaganda does colossal harm to the society.

«But the modern world cannot exist without advertising! – object others. - The fact is that advertising, pushing trade, in turn pushes all the industry providing us with progress and economic growth». Let's try to find out what kind of progress it is and where such economic growth leads us.

###  Falling into the abyss

Today's economics is a mechanism of colossal size, where the interests of a great number of banks, corporations and government structures are closely intertwined. Thousands of different parameters are continuously monitored such as slight fluctuations of consumer demand and dynamics of loans, oil reserves and directions of investments. Indicators of stock exchanges are like an electrocardiogram, which determines the state of health of the economics of this or that country. But the most important index is the GDP - gross domestic product, which reflects the market value of all goods and services. This indicator was first introduced and calculated by an American scientist Simon Kuznets, who went by the name of Semyon Abramovich Kuznets while he studied at Kharkov University.

Amazing figures

The past two centuries became a time of unprecedented economic growth. The total aggregated world GDP has increased by more than 40 times. In the 20th century the economic growth has noticeably accelerated. Just compare-if from 1820 to 1913 the world GDP increased by three and a half times, from 1913 to 1998 it increased by twelve and a half times! Judging only by the dynamics of GDP, the most successful century for Russia was not the 20th but rather the 19st! It seems impossible to believe, but figures testify that if in the 19th century average annual GDP growth rates were about one and a half times higher than the average world economy, in the twentieth century; they were about two times less. _В_ the 19th century the weakest was the economics of China (growth was only by 42%), and in the 20th century economics of Russia found itself in the same position (growth by 4.2 times). The highest economic growth for the 20th century was in Taiwan (growth of GDP by 133 times!). In 1913-1998 growth of GDP in Russia was the slowest among 50 industrial countries.

Angus Madison, "Monitoring of the world economics"

Russia became a super country in the 20th century; the Soviet Union won the Great War against Germany, ensured itself triumph in space exploration, and yet its economic growth was much lower than in the nineteenth century. This stunning paradox confirms once again that GDP is a very controversial index which is unable to show the whole picture of development. One country once produces a lot, but earns on it little. The other one \- on the contrary. We can give a very simple example to illustrate this situation. In China they produce goods for 50 dollars, but in the USA the same thing is sold for 250. It means that GDP of China will increase by 50 dollars, while that of the USA will decrease by 200 dollars.

In the mechanism of the world economic growth there were contradictions which periodically led to overproduction crises. And then, in the second half of the XX century they created, as it seemed then, a genius remedy – a wide consumer loans for the population. It ensures the unrestrainable growth of the economics, and overconsumption for the society. The loan enabled to bring future consumption to today. This way of effective demand expansion worked until the volume of the population debt exceeded its possible income for the whole life. The genius remedy transformed into a dangerous dope and finally led to the global crisis.

Millions of consumers are now hooked on loans, not only consumers, but some countries as well. The debt of the USA has reached astronomical proportions equaled to 14 trillion dollars and is increasing by 2-3 billion daily (!!!). In comparison: the huge China producers goods for half million dollars a day. The ratio of total external debt to GDP is considered to be critical if it reaches 50 %. In 2011 the USA reached the 100% level, thereby exceeding the critical level by double! The external debt is even worse in many other Western countries.

People and countries, affected by the epidemic of consumer idiotism, spend money which they, in fact, have not earned and which they are unlikely to earn at all. Since 1985 the USA has had a negative trade balance for roughly a quarter of a century; they purchase from other countries much more than they produce and sell themselves. The difference is covered by printing new dollars. America has stopped being the world's biggest country- creditor, as it was before the beginning of the 80s, and has become the biggest country-debtor. The idea of issuing bonds for 100 years is already being discussed in the USA! In principle, it is hardly ever possible to return so much money. According to calculations made by the International Monetary Fund the total amount of loans to U.S. banks exceeds their own capital by13 times! As for Europe – by 26 times already!!! It is worth noting that, the biggest U.S. bank "Lehman Brothers» had the same ratio of capital to granted loans (leverage) at the time of its collapse in September 2008.

Global financial Frankenstein

«At the dawn of globalization, at the beginning of 1990-s the volume of purely speculative cross-currency financial transactions reached 1 trillion 300 billion dollars a day \- 5 times more than the volume of the world trade exchanges and almost as many as the reserves of all national banks in the world at that time (1 trillion 500 million dollars). What state will be able to withstand the pressure of the global financial Frankenstein? »

«...The disruption of the global system into many relatively small and politically and economically dissimilar units leading to the transformation of a huge part of the world into a neo-barbaric zone. To me this is the most likely option».

Andrei Fursov, «A hand-made crisis»

A number of leading economists came to the conclusion, that the current system crisis – it is clear evidence that liberal financial capitalism has reached the limit of its development. Leastways, in the current form of crazy consumption and reckless lending.

###  Consequences of the wild race

What has the wild economic race of the last century given to mankind? What did we start with and what have we come to? Of course our life has become much more comfortable. A lot of things, our grandfathers could hardly have ever dreamed of, have become realities. Television, Internet and mobile communication have become an integral part of our life. Household appliances have changed our homes beyond recognition. This is fine, but what is the price of these achievements? Is it not too high? Could we have done it with less expense, if the world had been ruled by reason, instead of money? Just look at what we have now instead of the green world surrounding us? For two centuries of significant economic growth more than half of the rain-forests have been destroyed. Every year an area equal to Austria and Switzerland is cut down! The epidemic of consumer idiotism has led to unprecedented pollution of the environment. Landfills reach fantastic proportions. It is not surprising, as each urban resident produces a ton of waste per year. A fraction of this garbage is processed but much of it is lying around in the parks and forests, floating in rivers and seas.

A trash continent

In 1995 a young playboy and yachtsman Charles Moore discovered a new "continent" in the Pacific Ocean which consisted of plastic garbage. After a session in a California university he decided to spend some vacation time on the Hawaiian Islands and for the sake of saving time he went there directly not using the usual routes. After some days Charles realized that he was swimming through a global scrap-heap. «During the week every time when I went on deck, some plastic trash was floating by, – Moore wrote in his book "Plastics are forever?" – I could not believe my eyes: how did we manage to foul such a vast area of water? I had to swim day after day through that scrap-heap, and there was no end in sight...

That huge crap-heap has been formed by the ocean currents. It occupies an area in the Pacific Ocean twice the size of the Ukraine! The rapid pollution of the oceans started about half a century ago, when plastic was invented. More than a century is needed for its complete decomposition. According to Green Peace more than 10 million tons of plastic items get into the ocean every year. Big trash islands started to appear in other oceans as well. But the world's biggest countries avoid seeing this problem.

In the 1950-s mankind started to explore space and has managed to clutter it as well. Nowadays about 320 thousand (!!!) trash debris created by man revolve around the earth. Special services have to track the movement of each piece of debris, as all this space refuse poses a risk to the space station and satellites.

What are we doing with our planet and with ourselves! Environmental pollution leads to a significant increase in life-threatening diseases, in particular, different types of cancers. Elementary gluttony and over- comfort undermine our health.

According to doctors, more than half of all our diseases are explained by lack of exercise and reduced motor activity. Even children suffer from this, sitting in front of computers and TV screens for hours. Never before have so many people suffered from obesity. Overconsumption now is, as a rule, misconsumption which has serious ill-effects. In 1950 25% of Americans were overweight; in 2002 that figure had climbed to 65%. According to calculations, in the near future this figure will increase to 75%. Today in the European Union one in two inhabitants suffers from overweight and one in three from obesity. According to forecasts of the World Healthcare Organization (WHO) in the near future, diseases associated with overweight will be a major cause of death. In the last 50 years fatal diseases have increased fourfold. More than 80 % of school children suffer from any given disease meaning that less than 20% of children are healthy! The fact is that diseases which used to occur only among senior people, now affect the youth. Today people die of a stroke even at the age of 18. A crazy pace of life, constant tension and fear lead to the growth of neurological diseases, mental and behavioral disorders. According to medical statistics in the 20th century, their number in the world increased by 10 times, including psychosis which increased by nearly 4 times, neurosis - 62 times, alcoholism - 58 times.

Many people say that a significant economic growth leads to continuous improvement of wellbeing. But is it really so? Judging by the increase in GDP did the prosperity of Russia really increase by 4 to 5 times in the last hundred years? At the beginning of the 20th century there were, on average, 5 children per family meaning that one working man could support a family of seven. Now in the 21st century, as a rule, both husband and wife work but many of them are unable to have one child, let alone two because of financial worries. Most families don't even consider having a third child at all. Today Europeans have much more money and hence can afford many more houses and cars. Have they become happier? Not at all! Polls have shown this. In America, in Europe. Since the 1950's incomes have tripled but, according to polls, people are less happy.

###  Radical changes are needed

In 2011 Russia was third in the world in number of billionaires (101), behind the USA (413) and China (115). However, in terms of GDP per capita, Russia has been lagging behind the leading Western countries for half a century, and even more. We can see that the level reached in Russia at the beginning of the 21st century, was reached by England in 1934, the USA – in 1935, Sweden – in 1944, France – in 1951, Germany – in 1955, Italy – in 1959. Egor Gaydar presented this data in his «Economic growth and the human factor ». He noted that for two centuries Russia showed no improvement; indeed it has become worse in the last decades. That is to say that there is no chance to "catch up and overtake", not only America, as once Nikita Khrushchev dreamed, but even Portugal, as recently planned by Vladimir Putin.

On the other hand, maybe it is not so bad that the epidemic of consumer idiotism has affected Russia to a lesser extent than in the West. We should learn something from the mistakes of others and offer humanity a different direction of development. Now the world is ruled by Greed, not Reason. So a lot of things are done to harm rather than benefit a human being. We can say that in medical centers of the West more than one hundred thousand clearly unnecessary operations are done every year just for the sake of earning unbelievably high fees. Pharmacology business gets huge profits and it is objectively not interested in promoting a healthy lifestyle. Since the more people are sick, the more medicines they take, then the more profitable it is for business. Independent researchers claim that the hype around the avian and swine flu has been raised especially to profit pharmacological concerns. Some experts even provided evidence that these viruses were artificially created for purely commercial reasons.

In the mad pursuit of super-profits big business essentially pushes mankind to self-destruction. It must be stopped! The world needs to be given Reasonable Development Strategy. The most respected philosophers and economists say that we need a radical change of lifestyle.

To change the direction of development

«If we start from the previous industrial paradigm that people exist for the sake of consumption, then the task that faces modern mankind is monstrous, cannibalistic. And Nazism is nothing compared to the main focus of this task. Because the task is how to dispose of a large part of the population of the Earth. And the only alternative is to confess that income and consumption in general are not the targets, we need to change the direction of development».

Mikhail Delyagin, political scientist and economist

We must live in full harmony with nature and not destroy our environment. It is necessary to identify the main priority of development, which hides in a simple and understandable word HAPPINESS .It is noteworthy that four-fifths of the USA respondents said they see that the main function of the state is to raise the level of happiness, not welfare. It means that the realization of the so called «American dream » doesn't give people full satisfaction. So how can we attain this? What do most people lack even at the highest level of wellbeing?

A lot of people in the modern world don't have enough love! Love in a broad sense, not only for a man or a woman, but also for parents, children and even neighbors. Only love gives a person a feeling of complete happiness. So happiness is not the result of greater prosperity but rather a greater degree of love. Nowadays governments of nearly all countries are all complaining that they don't have enough money. Yet love is absolutely not a material substance. Love does not require technical, energy or financial resources. We just need the warmth of the soul to appear in every person. The human being must live not only by using his brains, but also his heart. And he must love not only himself!

Chapter 2.

###  Demographic catastrophe

Europeans are dying out * How we are killing our future * Reverse expansion * Lessons from European history * A world scale tragedy

###  Europeans are dying out

The demographic catastrophe is a problem of NATIONAL SAFETY. This crisis is much more dangerous for Europe than the economy. Like the scourge of radiation it goes unnoticed over time. Therefore most part of the population and even the government don't realize the scale of the catastrophe. The worst situation is in Russia, which used to be among the three most populated countries in the world for the last two centuries, behind only India and China. However now Russia is in the ninth place and will be even lower soon. At the same time there is a boom in the birth rate in many southern countries. For example, the population of Iran has doubled in 25 years such that in the middle of this century the population of Iran will have surpassed that of Russia.

Results of a Russian census clearly demonstrate that the phenomenon of population decline is accelerating. «Traditionally Slavic regions are actually dying out » - claimed Yuriy Krupnov, chairman of the Supervisory Board of the Russian Institute of Demography, Migration and Regional Development. Experts are warning that the situation is going to worsen. In the past, great wars led to serious demographic problems but now, even in peace time, the losses are comparable to those.

Crisis of human resources

«Since the collapse of the Soviet Union there have been only two births for every three deaths. It is not just an extensive demographic crisis; it is a far -reaching all-pervading crisis of human resources. Despite all the warnings we see signs of the coming catastrophe, the political elite hasn't realized the scale of the changes presently taking place. In the next twenty years the problem of sharp decline of employable population will affect all spheres of Russian society. The demographic crisis will force Russia not only to review its place on the world arena, but also its political structure and even geographical borders. »

Nicolas Ebershtadt, professor of the American Institute of Business, «Demographic crisis of Russia in peace time»

At first sight the situation in other European countries does not seem as catastrophic. In 2010 the number of inhabitants of the European Union exceeded half a billion. The yearly population growth rate is about one and a half percent. However even this number is deceptive in that the growth is 60-70% due to the influx of newcomers rather than an increase in the birth rate. If we take illegal immigration into consideration, the proportion is even worse. Even in Germany, the most economically developed country of the European Union there has been a decrease of 2.3% in population despite migration. The situation is similar in many other countries of the European Union. In general, for the period from 2005 to 2010 the birth rate in Europe decreased by 26.7%. At the same time the population of Africa has nearly doubled!

Today, not a single country in Europe has a birth rate equal to the level needed for the replacement of generations - generally accepted to be 2.1 births per woman. In most countries it is much less. In countries with leading birth rates such as Great Britain, France, Ireland the increased population only disguise the dwindling populations of native European people, as it is only due to migrants from Asia and Africa.

The threat to European civilization

«The birth rate of Muslim immigrants in France is three times higher than that of native French people. The wave of an Arabic generation of «boomers», which is being supported by aggressive illegal immigrants, can increase the proportion of Muslims in France, Italy and Spain to a quarter or even one third of the population. In 40 years, beginning from 2010, even if Muslims in Roman Europe make up 20-25% of the population, their share of employable adults may reach or even exceed 40%. «This era, from 2010 to 2050, can change the nature of European civilization »

Michael Vlachos, analyst of U.S. State Department, professor of John Hopkins University

«If current trends continue, the Muslims will be the majority of European population by the end of the 21st century ".

Bernard Lewis, a leading American expert on Islam

###  How we are killing our future

In the Soviet Union there was a popular joyful slogan «Children are our future! ». But most of conceived children were terminated during this very period. But most of conceived children were annihilated under this slogan. Of course, nobody called to kill the future of the country, but that was actually done in the horrific scales. According to Russian demographers more than 300 million abortions took place in Russia in the last half century. How many lives were wasted by common medical forceps without gas chambers or concentration camps. It is twelve times (!) more than the country lost during the very bloody Second World War! In the 1960 -s only one child out of four conceived was allowed to be born in the USSR, the other three were just annihilated.

Even today, there are only 4 live births for every 10 conceptions. This means that the number of children slaughtered in the wombs of mothers in Russia still exceeds the number of births. Nowadays this killing procedure is financed by the government as part of compulsory health insurance. It's a paradox: the execution of some maniac is now impossible, but to tear an innocent child in the womb and possibly future genius – is easy! We can recall the Great Russian scientist Dmitri Mendeleev, who was the fourteenth child in the family. In our «humane" century he would simply not be allowed to be born - he would have been terminated straight in the womb.

As a matter of fact, in his time it was Mendeleev who calculated that the population of Russia at the end of the 20th century would reach half a billion! This was an accurate calculation, not a fantasy. If we consider the more than 300 million murdered by doctors and mothers and add the 35-50 million of victims who died during the war and Stalin's repressions to the current 140 million population of Russia , there would indeed be nearly half a billion. That is precisely the figure predicted by the greatest Russian scientist. Of course, he could not imagine that the Russian people would begin to fight themselves and kill millions of their own children.

Now feminists from the Russian association of Population and Development – RAPaD (RANIR in Russian –it is a re-named association of family planning ) stand firm on the fact that every woman has the right to give birth to as many children as she wants or not give birth if she doesn't want to . The Orthodox Church condemns abortion without any results and calls for a return to large patriarchal family. Demographers only shrug helplessly, saying that nothing can be done - that is the trend of development.

Most families now live much better and in greater comfort than their ancestors did a hundred years ago, or even during the post-war years. Back then a lot of women had children, but now they don't want to. Whenever we talk about women's rights, we must admit that in pre-revolutionary royal Russia these millions of infant children killed by their mothers would have come into being. And not just because of high religiosity of people and a total ban of abortions. The main thing is that rules of life were quite different.

Fewer children, but longer queues ....

At the beginning of 2012, the Children Fund (UNICEF) and the Independent Institute of Social Policy presented a report in Moscow on the situation of children in Russia. According to research, the number of children in Russia has decreased in comparison with 2000 by 7. 5 million and is now equal to about 26 million. At the same time only 25% of families can raise children without financial problems, 50% - can but with difficulties, 25% - cannot afford children at all. Despite the significant reduction in the number of children in Russia, queues to get a place in a kindergarten rose by seven times (!) Now there are more than two million children!

One hundred years ago in Russia an average family had five children, but now – only one and a quarter, that is, four times less. The ratio of total birth rate in Western Europe is only 1.2 births per woman. It is less than minimum threshold for the replacement of generations by 0.9. This means that the population is dwindling or degenerating at a pace twice faster than necessary to replace itself. To overcome the deepest demographic crisis we need every family to have a third child. Even worse, as polls show, there are few families who are going to have a third child. And the percentage of families who give birth to a second child is also decreasing. At the same time the number of people who are unable to have children at all is steadily growing.

We are dying out

"The emancipation of a woman, her work outside her home leads to sorrowful consequences: women give birth to fewer and fewer children. This situation is of such amplitude that it is leading, I dare to say, to a degeneration of entire peoples. And it is not an exaggeration. Depopulation of Europe and Russia is obvious. We are dying out. It is difficult to accept, but it is a fact. It is not just a demographic decrease or a pit; it is a social and national catastrophe.

... It is not possible to grow a strong and true desire to be a mother in a woman by socio-economic methods. It is obvious that in this case the attitude to a child will be different, and his upbringing up will be seen not as a high priority thing in life, but rather as a burden. In other words, the problem of infertility is in the head, and not in the pocket. Goals, ideals and standards of women have just changed. ».

Yelena Belyaeva, gidepark.ru

Scientists claim that well-advertised measures of Russian authorities to increase the birth rate are in fact ineffective. Hopes that financial stimulation would solve the problems with births were dashed. In Russia there is a widespread belief that the main reason for low birth rate is poor social and material conditions of families. Many people say that they do not want to "produce poverty." Of course, a low living standard affects giving birth, but it is not the main reason. I will give just three arguments:

The first one: nowadays in Russia there are a lot of rich families, living in very comfortable material conditions. However, even in these families there are seldom many children. So money is not everything.

Secondly, the experience of many European countries shows that material stimulation of parents doesn't justify hopes and gives only a small short-term effect. There is no country in the world where money would lead to a baby boom.

Thirdly, in all European countries, including Russia, demographic growth is observed, as a rule, not in the richest but in the poorest regions. For example, in Eastern Germany women give birth to children more than in Western Germany, where the level of prosperity is much higher. In general, all over the world, 90 percent of the population growth is due to poor countries.

Family devaluation

« Formed for over thousands of years the family's need for many children is now dying. A decrease in the number of children in the family and birth rate is not explained by financial and housing difficulties, but by the devaluation of the family life style, unpopularity of families as a style of behavior in society, antivalue of maternity and paternity ».

Anatoly Antonov, doctor of philosophical Sciences, head of Department of Family Sociology and Demography of the Sociological faculty of the Moscow University

However, these conclusions made by scientists refer mainly to Europeans. In the East a large family with many children is a source of pride for a man. But in Russia, it is considered to be a sign of dementia. Eastern people treasure their children who, in return, respect and revere their elders. Westerners often perceive their children as a great burden and they have been known to spit on their parents. All this, of course, inevitably affects the birth rate.

A new movement called Childfree meaning "free from children" has already spread to Russia from the West. These people fundamentally do not want to have children. They even voluntarily sterilize themselves. During the Soviet times, the word «selfish» sounded almost like an insult. Now in Russia, no one has scruples. The slogan «Love yourself! » is becoming increasingly popular. Earlier in the Soviet Union collectivism and «bright» Communist ideals were ingrained in people's minds. In those times very serious structures practiced questions of ideology. Now this important area and its impact on society is clearly underestimated. Everything is left to chance and to the mercy of big business, which promotes ideology of mad consumption through advertising. Selfishness is erected in as a cult, and leads Europe to ethnic degeneration.

Why giving birth is unprofitable

«Two producing spheres coexist, interact and compete with each other on our planet - production of goods and production of people. The laws of Economics are the same in both these areas. But if production of things is developed by leaps and bounds, production of people is in a state of permanent crisis...

Simultaneously in different parts of the planet there are two crises: the crisis of overproduction of people in developing countries and the crisis of underproduction of people, called depopulation, in developed capitalist countries. And in both cases the scale of production is determined by its profitability.

A family is a kind of factory producing people; it spends enormous funds on its activities but in the end gives the product on the labor market completely free of charge. Any production, not only the production of people in such conditions is doomed... It is surprising that in these conditions people are ever born. In capitalist countries birth of people is not just less profitable than production of things, not just non-competitive, it is absolutely unprofitable ... for example in Great Britain the cost of raising a child is equal to that of buying a country house. It is about one hundred thousand pounds».

Valery _А_ kparov,«The Economics of people production»

Indeed, in underdeveloped countries, where there is no pension it is profitable to give birth to children: they not only help to feed the family, but are the sole support in old age. In Europe giving birth to children is unprofitable and this process moves to other countries according to the economic laws of globalism.

Within the framework of international division of labor, we can observe the transfer of goods as well as the migration of people. The notion of «reproduction of labor force» has been widely known since the times of Karl Marx. In Asia and Africa it is much cheaper. Therefore, in the context of international division of labor, the main capacities of «production of children» have moved there. These are unspoken economic laws, which are, of course, not declared openly, but, nevertheless, they are clearly observed.

###  Reverse expansion

In 1900, according to UN estimations, one in four people on the planet, 24.7% lived in Europe. Today, Europe's population is slightly more than 10%. By 2025 the proportion of Europeans in the population of the planet will be reduced to 7%. Suicidal decline in the birth rate among the native peoples of Europe is compensated by the influx of millions of migrants from Asia and Africa that solves economic problems, but exacerbates ethnic ones. This is the main reason why a xenophobic sentiment among youth is growing in Russia and other countries of Europe. Now no-one is surprised to hear about murders based on ethnic grounds in Moscow and St. Petersburg, it has become almost commonplace. Ethnic problems have increasingly spilled over into the streets of European cities. Apparently it is just the beginning!

Migration and the problem of ageing

«The main demographic problem in Europe is rapid ageing of the population and it cannot be solved only by migration, because then it must reach enormous sizes. In order to save the modern ratio of the working population in the EU to pensioners, the European Union should take 14 million immigrants annually for over half a century ».

David Labor, Professor of demography, the University of Oxford

What is 14 million? It is the population of Sweden and Norway together! Obviously, this avalanche of migrants may just blow up Europe. Therefore, according to experts, European governments should immediately develop a new policy. At any level of birth rate, Europe, of course, will not become desolate. Millions of representatives of other continents will willingly replace dying out white people. But one should understand that they are able to change Europe dramatically, just as Europeans radically changed Africa, Asia and America in their time.

Reverse expansion of black and yellow-faced brothers comes to replace centuries-old expansion of the white people. If earlier Europeans conquered the whole world by travelling to those countries that they would take over, now people from all over the world are rushing to Europe!! Moreover, decline of the white race representatives is indicated not only in Europe but also in America. In addition to this, there is a baby boom among immigrants. For example, the residents of the USA of Hispanic origin still account for only 11 percent of the population, but they provide 40 percent of annual population growth. The head of the American Analytical Services of Stratford Inc., George Friedman, predicts that over time they will become the predominant population of the south-western states.

The Russian researcher, Ivan Malyshev, in his book «Demography: The death of the white race is the most important historical event of the 21st century» draws a daunting future development for Europeans. It predicts an inevitable collapse of the white race and the transition of leadership in modern civilization to representatives of the yellow race. Ivan Malyshev seeks to prove the objective necessity and even usefulness of migration. In his opinion fresh blood is very important for Europeans. Even though it will not save the white race, will it help to prolong the agony or make the transition to the domination of the yellow race smoother and less painful? That would be very weak consolation for the original peoples of Europe.

This creeping demographic catastrophe is the most serious challenge to happen to the European civilization in the last thousand years!! Unfortunately, not all Europeans realize it yet. Many recognize the extreme seriousness of the demographic problem, but do not consider that personally they should do something to act on it. Let the state deals with the problem, one child in the family is more than enough. It means somebody should solve the problem but without us. And how to solve it without Europeans? How to provide rapidly aging continent with pensions? To allow 14 million migrants to come o Europe per year and to contribute reverse expansion? Those who don't like such option should realize: the salvation of Europe from degeneration is not only the problem of the leaders but also of every white European!

Similarly, population issues translate into other problems that have arisen as well, such as: How to provide a rapidly aging population with the promised pensions? How can 14 million migrants be allowed to live in Europe every year without it contributing to reverse expansion? Those who don't like such an option should realize that the salvation of Europe from degeneration is not only the problem of the leaders but also of everyone in Europe!

Unfortunately, this simple truth has not been understood by the general population yet. But they are already very concerned about reverse the expansion. This is seen in a noticeable increase in xenophobic moods and abrupt rise in right-wing nationalist parties in many European countries. What will these parties be able to do if tomorrow they come to power elected by the people? Will they limit the influx of immigrants? It won't solve demographic problems and Europe won't be saved from degeneration. Only a significant increase in birth rate among white race peoples can save the situation. To see the abyss towards which we are headed, it is useful to turn to the past.

###  Lessons from European history

Mortal danger of unsolved demographic problems can be shown most clearly by the fate of Ancient Rome. Then and there, emancipation of women caused a crisis of the family and catastrophic decline in the birth rate. They even had to involve barbarians to ensure the security of their borders. As a result the great civilization collapsed. It was not the barbarians who killed it, but the Romans themselves, as they did not want to give birth to children. The

same is true of Europeans today. Frightening historical parallels and analogies are seen not only in methods of struggle with the demographic problem, but even in the reasoning of ordinary people:

Old arguments

«Poor people don't have children, as they fear that if they eat badly and do not receive education, they will grow cads deprived of any virtues»

Plutarch, the Roman philosopher, «About love to posterity»

Just as modern Europeans, Romans eventually lost interest in the institution of marriage. Exactly the same as it is now, the state then was desperately trying to regain respect for the family, because its existence was under threat. Emperor Augustus established very strict laws, according to which men aged 20 to 60 years and women aged 20 to 50 were deprived of property rights for single blessedness, as well as men over 25 years old and women older than 20 for having no children. In the struggle for family values they tried to act not only with a whip, but also with a carrot. Parents of three or more children were granted different rights and privileges. However, the tough measures of Emperor August to overcome crisis of the family and increase birth rate did not find support among people. Many representatives of the privileged class - equites or riders openly expressed their dissatisfaction.

How can you be called?

During triumphal games the riders vigorously insisted on abolition of the law of single blessedness and childlessness. Then August gathered riders who were single and who were married and had children in different parts of the forum. Seeing that there were fewer married men than all the rest, he was grieved and addressed them with a speech: «... Rome was originally only a handful of men; but having made a decision to get married and have children, we surpassed the whole world not only by our power, but also in number. We must remember this and overcome our mortality, passing our breed, as a torch, to the endless line of descendants and thus jointly convert our mortality into eternal life. With this purpose our Creator, the first and the greatest of the gods, divided people into two sexes, male and female, and put love and sexual desire in both of them, as he wanted this union to bear fruit and new generations to turn even mortal life into immortal...»

Then Emperor Augustus turned to single riders: «How can I call you? Men? You haven't proved the right to have such a name. Citizens? It is your fault that the town is being destroyed. Romans? You are doing everything possible to make the name disappear... the City is men and women, not buildings, colonnades and deserted forums. Imagine the fair anger of the great Romulus, our founder, if he had compared the time and circumstances of his birth with your refusal to have children even in legal marriages... Those old Romans gave birth to children even with strangers, and you deny Roman women the right to become mothers of your children... You're not hermits, to live without women, «none of you are eating and sleeping alone. All you wish is freedom to sensual pleasures and luxuries...»

Dion Cassius «The Roman history»

There are a lot of surprisingly important things for our epoch in this very emotional speech of Emperor Augustus. Modern Europe is repeating the fate of Ancient Rome almost to a trace. In the same way it spread culture and technical achievements of their civilization all over the world, it was destroyed by a powerful backward wave of reverse expansion. Ancient Rome, depraved by wealth, was also a victim of arrogance and almost pathological egoism of its citizens, who did not want to think about posterity. First, the barbarians were involved as labor force, but then their hordes invaded, as conquerors. They completely destroyed the Roman civilization and set up their new orders.

Barbarians swallowed up Rome

«A huge mass of barbarians was in fact «fed up » by the Romans on the borders; very surprisingly favorable demographic conditions were created for them! After all, what was the result? German tribes settled down along the borderline with the permission of Rome (thus, it avoided wars with them), received the status of «federates» (allies) - and enjoyed the fruit of Imperial culture, moving to a more productive agriculture. And they rapidly reproduced themselves. After several centuries of such a policy the Barbarians strengthened and pounced on Rome, destroying a highly advanced culture and plunging Europe in the darkness of ignorance and factionalism for many centuries.

Andrey Fursov, a Russian historian

A similar fate can be expected for Europe in this century because we are trying to solve modern demographic problems using the same methods. But the Romans ultimately failed. It is obvious that the same thing will happen to us with this approach! Meanwhile, Europe had a quite successful, though a very nonstandard experience of dealing with demographic problems.

Salvatory polygyny

After the great plague, when the population of some countries was reduced by nearly half, polygyny was allowed for the sake of increasing birth rate. In Germany, during the reign of Emperor Charles V, bigamy was punishable by death. But after a 30 year war, which wiped out a quarter of the population of Germany, it was legalized. In 1650 in Nuremberg, a law was passed which stated that: "as the needs of the Holy Roman Empire require recovery of the population, destroyed by the sword, diseases and hunger, every man is allowed to marry two wives for the next 10 years".

Unlike in our time, it was impossible to attract millions of immigrants to Europe instead of native peoples. So they had to solve the problem of increasing population exclusively with their own human resources.

In the middle of the last century the Soviet Union found itself to be in a similar, though less severe, situation. The country also solved the demographic problem only on its own without any support from outside. Joseph Stalin, perhaps without knowing it himself, used the experience of the Holy Roman Empire quite successfully. Although polygyny was not officially allowed in the postwar Soviet Union, men de facto were allowed to have not only two wives, but even more.

The tax on childlessness in the USSR was introduced in November 1941, when it became clear that war would take millions of lives; five years before the «great leader» canceled the gain of red feminists who achieved legalization of abortion in Russia after the Bolshevik victory. Joseph Stalin again prohibited artificial interruption of pregnancy. In 1944 he also abolished the right of mothers to apply to the court with paternity claims and exaction of alimony from the person she was not married to. It meant that men were released from any responsibility for extramarital relations. In a half-starved, war-torn country women were obliged to give birth in any conditions, and for men, in fact, non-official polygamy was allowed.

It is clear why it was done this way. The death of millions of soldiers on the fronts of the Great War led to a difficult demographic situation. It was quite obvious that there were not enough husbands for all women. Therefore, the authorities decided «to share» men for all prospective brides. Stalin could not afford to have millions of women remain childless at a time when the country needed to increase its population .Only God knows how single mothers suffered those years. Their life was very hard, but their children didn't die from hunger. Almost all of them somehow were brought up and educated. Later, some of this generation born after the war ensured scientific and technical take-off of the USSR and its triumph in space

Due to those laws, prohibiting abortions and admitting an informal polygamy, the country received or, more precisely, didn't allow the termination of about 30 million citizens in the womb. In fact, it was only this measure which helped to compensate the loss of lives during the war. Then, in the mid-50s, under Khrushchev, abortions were legalized again and the mechanism of self-destruction of people started working again...

###  A world-scale tragedy

In the last 500 years, European civilization changed Africa, Asia and America drastically. It destroyed the traditional way of life of many peoples, imposed another religion and culture on them, as well as technical achievements and higher living standards. It became the main foundation of the modern world and dominates in everything now: in culture, in science, in fashion. In 2007 James Watson, an American biologist who received the Nobel Prize for the discovery of DNA structure, confessed that representatives of different races have genetically different intellectual abilities.

If aliens secretly seized our planet and wanted to turn everyone on the earth into dull submissive slaves, whom would they start with to turn off the brains of all the people? From Europeans! Why? Much of modern civilization is based on achievements of Europeans. Therefore, the decrease in their numbers is equivalent to shrinkage of the brain of all mankind! This is a disaster for the whole world! And it is already taking place. Now 90 per cent of population growth is taking place in poor countries. The percentage of Europeans is steadily declining. The gene pool, created by many generations of highly educated people, is disappearing without leaving a trace. Meanwhile, according to research published in the American Journal of Human Genetics, the intellectual ability of people is thought to be 80% predetermined by genetics.

The problem is being hushed up

«The net birth rate in Germany is currently 0.7.This means that the generation of grandchildren will be half less in number than the generation of grandparents. The annual birth rate in Germany declined from 1.3 million from the 60-s to 65.000 in 2009. If it goes on like that, in 50 years the birth rate will decrease to 200-250 thousand a year. And only half of the number of these new born children will be descendants of the Germans who lived in the mid 60-s of the 20th century. For the last 45 years it was considered politically incorrect to discuss the demographic crisis. Only when the generation of young rebels of the 60-s grew old and became concerned about their pensions, little by little the situation changed and it became possible to speak about the problem. "But it happened 40 years too late. Germany continues to suppress discussion of existing difficulties, hiding behind political correctness".

Thilo Sarrazin, from the book «Germany's self-destruction, or how we are losing our country»

Actually the problem is receiving too little publicity or significantly underestimated not only in Germany, but in many other countries of Europe as well. For example, for the Russian leader Vladimir Putin the problem of saving tigers on earth is more relevant than the salvation of the degeneration of his own people. On his initiative a worldwide tiger forum was held in St.Petersburg. Although the forum to discuss the threat of ethnic degeneration of European people is much more needed, nobody is willing to make it happen. It seems that no one takes this problem seriously enough. The Russian president does not see the impending disaster and cheerfully informs people about some increase in birth rate. Although in reality it is only an insignificant increase, which can be compared to a slight deceleration before falling into the abyss...

Why is the world more concerned about the decline in the population of tigers and polar bears than about the decline in the population of white people? No one with a sound mind would claim that the decrease in the birth rate of white bears is compensated by an increase in the birth rate of their brown confreres. Help to polar bears will never be called racist and discriminatory to brown bears. Why is the attitude to people totally different? Why are we worse? It is considered to be indecent and politically incorrect to bring up the problem in modern society. This means that the great idea of equality is turned inside out. It turns out that our attitude to white bears is better than to white people. Isn't this discrimination?!!

The Western European countries are concerned about the economic crisis, but seem not to notice a death threat to their own national security. While they are trying to impose their democracy on the countries of the East together with Americans, spending astronomical sums on this, their own cities are slowly conquered by unarmed foreigners from the South.

The cry from the heart

«This compulsory understatement of the danger, this forced humility to fate cause disgust. I am against Islamization of France! Though I might be still overshadowed by the prosecution, it will not prevent me from expressing my opinion! Our ancestors, our fathers and grandfathers gave their lives expelling the invaders out of France for centuries, one by one, to make our country free from any alien subjugation. But for the last twenty years we put up with backstreet, dangerous and uncontrolled penetration of elements who not only ignore our laws, but year after year are trying to impose their laws to us».

Brigitte Bardot, from the book «A cry in the silence »

Essentially Brigitte Bardot writes about the ethnic war that we are losing, and it is clearly seen in the streets of many European cities. But because of "political correctness" this topic is taboo and to talk about as it is just dangerous. Because of for her book the famous actress was subjected to prosecution.

The terrifying paradox is that European governments are in fact on the side of the aliens in the war. Foreigners do not even have to fight with us, because we are at war with ourselves! As not they but we ourselves kill millions of our unborn children. In so doing we destroy our future freeing up vital space for representatives of other peoples. Migrants from other continents flood Europe and irritate many Europeans. But they should not be angry with them, but with themselves! Some extremists even grab weapons themselves like the Norwegian shooter who organized a massacre in Oslo in the summer of 2011.

Revelations of the deputy

«I have read only 500 pages of his diary, extracts and can say that 20 % of Europeans think the same today. It means that 100 million people in Europe share his thoughts about protection of the Christian population from invasion of Islam. Part of his notes, of course, contains an appeal to violence, but some ideas are simply superb»

Mario Borghese, deputy of the Euro Parliament from the Italian National Party «Northern League"

Militant "defenders" of Europe don't understand that the problem can't be solved by shooting. The main «weapon» in this ethnic war is LOVE. Foreigners win because they have more love! Muslims love all their children, and Christians often love just one, but two or three others are killed in the "planning" of the family. Christians need to learn to love from Muslims, who observe the main commandment of Jesus much better at least concerning their children.

It is absolutely obvious that the problem of degeneration of native peoples of Europe requires no less attention than the problem of preservation of tigers or polar bears. We should examine the situation comprehensively and adopt targeted measures to increase the birth rate of specific ethnic groups. We will speak about it in more detail in the second part of the book.
Chapter 3.

###  The progressive degradation

Historical analogy * Intellectual decline * Anticulture and antiharmony * People have become worse than beasts

###  Historical analogy

In order to understand what system degradation is and how it can change modern Europe beyond recognition, it is useful to refer again to historical analogy. It is enough to compare the lifestyles of ancient Rome and medieval Europe, at least in one field , for example, in sanitation and hygiene.

Ancient Roman cities not only had amphitheaters, but also thermaes that were part of the Roman culture. They were built everywhere, including conquered lands. Among the most ambitious were the Imperial Baths of Caracalla, the ruins of which have survived in Rome ever since. They admitted more than two thousand people! It was a huge palace with fountains and waterfalls, decorated with mosaics, marble columns and statues of gods. The Roman architects and inventors developed an efficient central heating system with heated floors and walls «hypocaustum». Thermaes consisted not only of swimming pools, baths with different water temperature and steam rooms, but they also included a hall for gymnastics, exercising and, of course – a library. Everything was supplemented with parks and gardens. So, in comparison to the Roman Baths, even modern baths and aqua parks look fairly primitive. People who lived in ancient times, not only washed there, but also spent time as in a social universal club, where you could chat with friends over a cup of wine or sit in the library, exercise or take a walk in the magnificent park.

In Rome alone there were over a thousand thermaes, but after the victory of the barbarians they were all closed and demolished. The same thing happened in all Western Europe. The epoch of the stench and sewage started. In medieval cities chamber pots and slops were often poured directly out of the windows onto the heads of passers-by. The horrific stench of European cities is hard to imagine now.

Stinking Europe

«The streets stank of shit, backyards stank of urine, staircases stank of rotting wood and rat droppings; unventilated rooms stank of fusty dust, bedrooms – of greasy sheets, wet spring mattresses and a pungent sweet smell of chamber pots. People stank of sweat and unwashed clothes, breath smelled of rotten teeth, from their bellies there was a smell of onion soup, and the bodies when they were no longer young enough, stank of old cheese, and sour milk, and oncological diseases. Rivers stank, squares stank, and areas under bridges stank, as well as palaces. A peasant stank as a priest, a student of the artisan - as the wife of the master, all the nobility smelled, and even the King stank like a wild animal, and the queen like an old goat, in summer and in winter. .

Patrick Suskind, the novel "Perfumer"

It is curious that the birth of the modern fragrance industry was due to the royal stench. Initially, perfumes were only produced in order to suppress the terrible smell of unwashed royal bodies. In Paris tourists are told that King Louis XIV washed himself only twice in his life. Washing appalled the French Monarch. Washing was unhealthy according to the French Monarch. He was not the only one. Spain's Queen Isabella of Castile washed only twice in all her life - at birth and on her wedding day. The famous heartthrob English King Henry VIII in his life washed three times. Most aristocrats washed off dirt with the help of a perfumed cloth, which was used to wipe the body. It was recommended to wet armpits and groin with rosewater.

Wild ignorance led to unusual mores. You can imagine how education and culture suffered in the Middle Ages , if refraining from washing was strongly advised by doctors (!?). They tried to convince people that this procedure was extremely dangerous.

Bathing is a threat to life

«Bath water warms up the body, but weakens the organism and expands the pores, so it can cause illnesses and even death»

Medical treatise of the fifteenth century.

It is not surprising that in those days rich citizens washed once every six months, and many of them chose not to risk it and never had a bath.

In ancient Rome sewer systems were quite complex structures, which were created taking terrain into consideration, with the use of lead pipes and pumps. The Romans built them in many cities, including Lutetia (Paris). However, with the fall of the Ancient Roman Empire the city gradually turned into a hotbed of fetid infection. New buildings were built on the ruins but without drainage. Sewage was poured directly in the street. And the lack of sanitation led to terrible epidemics of plague and cholera, which took millions of lives. Entire cities died out in Europe.

During the Dark Ages, even monarchs were sometimes illiterate. Many discoveries made in ancient times were forgotten. For example, no one remembered the existence of such a country as India; but the ancient Roman Empire had a thriving business with it. Intellectual degradation led to a decline in not only art and literature, but also in science and technology. Stunning engineering and buildings were in ruins. It took centuries before Europe was able to get back on the path of technological progress.

In ancient Rome, with its countless thermaes no one would ever believe that aristocracy could be unwashed and smelly. In the same way, today we cannot imagine that the degradation of modern Europe can lead to horrible consequence .Now only the older generation can see that it happens rapidly.

###  Intellectual decline

In his infamous book "Self-destruction of Germany", Thilo Sarrazin talks about the threat of intellectual degradation. One of the main obstacles to the successful development of Berlin and the main source of its problems according to Sarrazin is the sharp decline of intellectual level of Berliners, who "from generation to generation are becoming more and more stupid." Of course, we can blame Thilo Sarrazin of harshness of judgment; however we can't help but agree that the problem of reduction of intellectual and educational level really exists. Not only in Germany but in many other countries as well, where Europeans or their descendants have lived. Standard school education has become longer, but less effective. Youth used to get more knowledge for 8-10 years, than they do now for 12. America surprises most of all. Results of school tests are decreasing steadily, 38 % of fourth-grade students cannot read even at a basic level. Excellent results for mathematics are shown by 44 % of students from Singapore, 38 % from Taiwan and only 7 % from the USA.

The situation in Europe is not much better. «Children stop studying at school» ¬says the Children's Rights Commissioner in Moscow, Evgeniy Bunimovich. His words are confirmed by results of research in secondary education. In the rating of 65 countries of the world, Russian senior students are behind many Asian peers. In mathematics they are only in the 38th and 40th place, and in the 41st and 43rd places in readers' literacy. Approximately one-third (28.5%) of the Russian students do not even reach the minimum threshold.

England used to be called «the workshop of the world». Now China has become «the workshop of the world». In pursuit of super profits Europe has displaced most of its industry to Asia. Now Europeans produce very little. Armies of engineers are now trained and working there, not here. Now Europeans produce very little. Armies of engineers are now working there, not here.

De-industrialization of the West leads to decline of science and education. At the same time, India, China and other Eastern countries achieve outstanding success. If young European people are losing interest in the scientific and technical creativity, Asians, on the contrary, are surprising in their commitment and creativity. Europe is no longer top in scientific and technological expertise, lagging behind China, Japan, India, and even Korea.

Intellectual degradation and problems of education are directly linked to radical change of the system of values. Now few people remember that half a century ago during the Soviet time physicists were among the most fashionable professions. They became heroes of films and teen idols. Back then the competition between two superpowers in space attracted young people into science. In its turn, a constant influx of fresh and brilliant minds greatly stimulated technical progress. Now the situation is completely different. Science in Russia has collapsed though it used to provide the country with a leading position in many areas. Few people are attracted by beggarly salaries. Only obsessed geniuses like mathematician Perelman who refused an international prize of one million dollars. In the USA, scientists are paid much more than in Russia, but even there problems with rejuvenation of staff in science are increasing.

For example, in the National Aeronautics and Space Administration - NASA the number of older workers exceeds the number of young by ten times! Forty percent of the workforce is over 50 and only 4% is under the age of 30.

The new generation is attracted by completely different interests. Stock market speculation not only undermines the economics of many countries, but also corrupts the society by thirst for easy money. Why do we need to study and work hard? It is better to play on Forex! There you can get fast and easy money. In fact young people are taught that hard and honest work is a cup of idiots and losers. The most intelligent and successful people make millions on currency speculation.

Science isn't prestigious anymore

«From a scientific and technical point of view the white race is stumbling. This is understandable: the youth no longer want to be scientists or engineers. Why? After all, in order to become an employee of, say, NASA one needs to learn and work hard for a long time. Then learn again from senior colleagues at work. And all this for the sake of what? To be content with five to fifteen thousand dollars a month? Never! We'd better study to be a lawyer and a financier: we can earn millions of dollars on successful lawsuits and speculation to earn enough by the age of thirty, to buy a house and a yacht, or even a personal «Jet» or an island in the Tropics. Or become a corporate raider: purchase shares of large technocratic companies, take them over - and then ruthlessly sell them in parts....

... These techies and old school capitalists could dig in their projects for years, content with a maximum profit rate of 10 percent per annum. But we, a new generation of post-industrial hustlers can easily make between 50 and 300 percent profit a year with very little effort or thinking. The main thing is profit, isn't it? Our God is: growth rates of shares on the stock exchange.

Looking at rapid careers of "post-industrial monkeys», the youth of the West turned away from science and engineering education, rushing to be lawyers, financiers and managers. It is easy to make fast money in show-business. On MTV day and night you can see either Hollywood dolls with fortunes of hundreds of million dollars, or fat black rappers who can't say two words correctly, but show their luxury mansions and collections of terrific cars».

Maxim Kalashnikov, «Sunset of White Christian world and post-industrialism »

Whom does mass media turn into idols? The most wealthy and greedy are glorified, but not the most intelligent. Clever people are seldom lauded, unless they are rich like the creators of Apple and Microsoft: Steve Jobs and Bill Gates. Everyone knows football or show-business stars, but no one knows the engineers of the Large Hadron Collider. No wonder science is losing its value and attractiveness for the new generation of Europeans.

In Russia there is also a terrible devaluation of intellectual labor. For example, the base salary of a professor of philosophy at St. Petersburg University is now equal to that of an Army sergeant! The usual author's fee for a book in Russia also is roughly equal to a sergeant's monthly salary! People of intellectual labor didn't know such material humiliation neither in tsarist Russia, nor even in the Soviet Union during the proletarian dictatorship. Under today's conditions, the degradation of education, culture and science is simply inevitable.

De-intellectualization of education

«The crisis of education is an important component of any general crisis, it was characteristic of the crisis of late antiquity and late feudalism. But now the scale is fantastic, since capitalism was built as a civilization of science and education, and the higher you go up - the harder you fall. What happening in science and especially education is going on with science and especially with education, in the world and in our country –is a catastrophe. Inadequacy of education and science in the modern world, in comparison to yesterday, and consequently to social life in general, all this creates a society where the authorities and the people are not only unable to overcome problems of the epoch , but even to see them. »

Andrey Furusov, Russian scientist

###  Shopkeepers are ruling now, not aristocrats...

There were different periods in the history of European society: the Renaissance, the age of Enlightenment, the era of Classicism... Now we live in the era of mad consumption. It is what determines the composition of real rulers to a large degree. For many centuries, aristocrats made up the ruling class: barons, earls, kings. Now Europe is really ruled by «shopkeepers»: bankers, traders and other bourgeois behind a democratic folding screen. On some historical stage they played a positive role in facilitating economic growth and technological progress. But now much has changed. And not for the better. Now «shopkeepers» define the main vector of development, leading our civilization into the abyss.

For real aristocrats such notions as nobility and honor were more important than money. They always tried to distance themselves from the bourgeois. Even an impoverished earl was considered much higher regarding his position in society than a rich merchant or a money lender. The aristocracy strived for development of culture, education of the common people and improving their morality. Initially merchants tried to counterfeit the ruling aristocracy. Therefore, «the honest merchant's word» used to be appreciated and valued more than bills. Gradually, however, during the transition of real power from aristocrats to bourgeois, moral values in European society constantly declined. Now shameless and mass deception has already become almost a norm even for massive firms, and the concepts of honor and conscience have virtually disappeared.

For the modern bourgeois the most important thing is money. Unfortunately, our era of consumption lowered many aristocrats to the level of shopkeepers morally. Not only barons and earls, but members of the British Royal family do not hesitate to "make money" wherever they can. Since the end of the XIX century even noble titles became a «commodity» that could be bought for big money. That was how some rich merchants turned into graphs. All this has contributed to accelerated degradation of elite of European society. The aristocracy no longer plays a leading role in solving complex political problems. Earlier its wisdom and foresight brought real benefits to European peoples.

How a wise Baron reconciled people

The role of aristocracy in history is very clearly seen in the example of two Baltic countries, Finland and Lithuania. In 1918, after the collapse of the Russian Empire both countries gained independence. In Finland a bloody civil war broke out between red and white Finns. The victory of the white Finns was mainly ensured by a talented general of the tsarist army, a true aristocrat, Baron Mannerheim. He had Swedish roots yet spoke Finnish albeit not very well. In May 1918, right after the victory parade in Helsinki, the general resigned because of fundamental differences with the government. Baron Mannerheim asked the Senate to declare an Amnesty, but his opinion was ignored. With the support of the government authorities, a wave of «white terror» started, shocking Europe. About 10 thousand red guards were shot . Even more people died in concentration camps from diseases or hunger. The number of victims of the terror was almost three times greater than the number of people who died in the battles of the civil war. Among them were many women, elderly and children.

After returning to power in 1919, Mannerheim himself announced a General Amnesty and stopped a ruthless massacre. He was above emotions and was not obsessed with the desire of revenge, like so many others. A true aristocrat, he worked single-mindedly for the future and the good of the country. He secured pensions for all veterans in equitable fashion. In 1920 the Baron founded the "Union of Child Protection which took care of the children of the poor and, especially, the orphans of former red guards. Later at his proposal, the holiday of the victory of white Finns over red was cancelled and became a day of remembrance of all Finns who died in a fratricidal war. In his wise ways the visionary aristocrat Mannerheim contributed to national reconciliation. And it gave a saving result. When in 1939 the Soviet leader Joseph Stalin attempted to occupy Finland, it did not work. Former red and white Finns stood shoulder to shoulder to defend the independence of their country.The vast Soviet Union was not able to defeat tiny Finland.

But in Lithuania history took a very different turn after much of its aristocracy fled the country. Once they had their own princes, and even a king, but by the 20th century aristocrats virtually disappeared. Civil strife in the Middle Ages prompted many Lithuanian princes to escape to neighboring Muscovy, where they founded famous noble families and became Russian. Those aristocrats who remained in Lithuania became polonized soon after the integration with Poland and ensuing creation of a single state: the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. Independent Lithuania was headed not by an aristocrat, but a peasant's son, Antanas Smetona, who graduated from St-Petersburg University. Unfortunately, he was not as wise and far-sighted as Baron Mannerheim. Following a military coup he became a dictator and immediately shot the leaders of the Communist party. In an impoverished country he made army officers an excessively rich caste, but mercilessly executed rebellious peasants. All this divided the Lithuanian people and later led to the loss of the country's independence and causing numerous victims. In 1940 Lithuania gave up to Stalin without a single shot.

After the war former Lithuanian officers became «forest brothers» and organized a resistance movement. But they were fighting not only against the Communist authorities, but also Lithuanian peasants. About two thousand soldiers and Soviet activists were killed, but the number of simple peasants killed was ten times greater - about 23 thousand! Almost all of them were killed at the hands of «forest brothers»; Communists, on the other hand, didn't kill hostile peasants, they sent them to Siberia. Nearly 70 years have passed since that time, but there is still no national reconciliation in the country. Perhaps it might have been different if Lithuania had had her own wise Baron...

The degeneration of Europe started with the degeneration of the elite. Unlike true aristocrats, business people are often quite singularly focused and have a very narrow-minded way of thinking, but many of them consider themselves to be smarter than professors... because they have earned so much money! A well-known American saying goes: «If you're so smart – show me your million! ». Of course, millionaires are not often met among professors. Most intellectuals live very modestly. But this does not mean that they are more stupid than shopkeepers and bourgeois.

In the era of mad consumption the power of money has reached its peak. Perhaps never before in human history has the world been so obsessed with greed as nowadays. It is curious that such an outcome was foreseen a hundred years ago by the most notable German aristocrat Emperor Wilhelm II, a distant relative of the Russian Tsar Nicholas II. At a banquet in honor of the 30th anniversary of his reign, he made a prophetic statement.

Everybody will be forced to worship the Golden calf

«Either Prussian-German- Teutonic world philosophy - justices, freedom, honor, and morality will prevail in glory, or Anglo-Saxon philosophy will force everybody to worship the Golden calf. In this struggle, one of them will have to give place to another. We are fighting for the victory of German philosophy".

The German Emperor Wilhelm II, 1918

As it is known Germany lost The Great War (World War I), and this was the reason for the grand collapse of the ruling European aristocracy and death of two empires - the German philosophical empire and the brilliant Austro-Hungarian. The third – the Russian empire- had collapsed by itself a little earlier. It is noteworthy that in the final stages of the Great War a mercantile America played a decisive role in the defeat of the German Empire. America: the country where worshipping the Golden Calf was almost becoming a national cult, where money is the measure of success. As an example, the value of a film is determined not so much by its true artistic merit, but by the amount of profit made at the box office.

Perhaps someone will blame the author of simplification of historical processes in rampant apology of aristocracy and unjust humiliation of bourgeois. Of course, among «shopkeepers» there are also a lot of highly educated people. Of course, not all aristocrats were beyond reproach. There were plenty of fools and moral freaks among them as well. But this does not change the essence of the argument. The crux here is not the personal characteristics of an individual, but rather the interests of the entire class as a whole.

Aristocrats and «shopkeepers» have completely different roles. How can one compare a good pump with a bad spotlight? It is evident that even the worst spotlight to light the way is much more useful than a pump...

Objectively aristocrats carried the light of knowledge to people and brought cultural development. And it happened for many centuries. The main objective of «shopkeepers» is to pump money by any means. Naturally therefore, they are not so much interested in the development as in the intellectual and cultural degradation of people! Of course, no government or corporation officially acknowledges such a strategy. But this is a natural consequence of the unbridled greed of «shopkeepers». Intellectual degradation of society and consumer idiocy of epidemic proportions are very profitable for business. In this way it is much easier to push unnecessary goods and any nonsense can be sold as high art. «Artistic» installations with toilets and piles of garbage is a vivid example of it. The skill of the painter is no longer in demand. Now the artist may not be able to draw at all yet easily make heaps of money. One could hardly consider this as great progress of European art. It is more likely to be its degradation and a steep drop.

The fact that not everything in this world can be measured in money has been known by people for a long time. Even Jesus Christ condemned service to Mammon. However, these days the world is ruled by greed, not reason. For the sake of profit «shopkeepers» often do not produce and sell something that is good and useful for people, but quite the opposite. And there are a lot of examples to support this.

Business profits are paramount

A healthy lifestyle is always more desirable than dependence on drugs. According to a professor and author of several books on exercise and sports medicine waiting lists to doctors could be reduced by at least half if only people led a healthy lifestyle and regularly performed basic physical exercises. By contrast, the excessive use of drugs often jeopardizes the delicate balance in the body and undermines its ability of natural self-defense.

It is well known that medicines, while helping to eliminate some problems, often create other more serious ones. However, relentless advertising and aggressive or seductive ads impose on people not something that is useful to them but instead what is more profitable for pharmaceutical corporations.

Not so long ago in the USSR industrial gymnastics was mandatory for all workers in most companies, and every day it was broadcast throughout the whole country. Now, few people even do morning exercises. Boys used to play football in almost every yard, but now this is seldom seen. Consumption of drugs in Europe, on the other hand, is still growing and growing. For example, in Russia in the last 15 years the income of the pharmaceutical «shopkeepers» has increased fourfold.

Why is humanity still using the antediluvian internal combustion engine invented in the nineteenth century? Simply, it is highly profitable for the oil industry. Mankind could already use clean energy, but this would threaten to bring down the oil market and ruin many oil magnates. Therefore, prospective studies in this area of research were blocked a hundred years ago (this topic will be dealt in greater detail in chapter 5). As a result, we are burning millions of tons of hydrocarbons, which lead to immense pollution of the planet and the premature death of millions of people. To what end? Only for the sake of profit for Big Business.

Imitating the aristocrats, the ruling business class prides itself on acting as guardians of morality. However it often leads to opposite results. Pornography and prostitution have now reached unprecedented proportions. Billions are earned on that. Sexual wildness must be opposed by sexual culture.Yet no one pays any attention to this sphere. Almost no one studies the history of sexual and family relations in the society. Almost every European capital has vulgar museums of eroticism, but there is no Museum of sexual culture and family.

It is not surprising, therefore, that many of the rulers and parliamentarians are in utter ignorance and take « high moral» laws which are contrary not only to God, nature and scientific data, but also to centuries-old experience of our ancestors. They spend millions on studies of the economic crisis and research for solutions, but almost nothing to study the far more insidious danger of the crisis of the European family unit.

Money is poorly compatible with truth. If one extrapolates the principles of «shopkeepers» and measure everything in money, it may turn find out that, in the short run, self-destruction of Europe is a more profitable business than its salvation. Birth and upbringing of European children is a very expensive "business", so it is more profitable to have «family planning» by using contraceptives or terminating pregnancies. The aristocracy would have never allowed such madness because they had a much longer term vision and cared about the future of their people and their classes.

For aristocrats the spiritual was a higher priority over the material world. To «shopkeepers» the opposite is mostly true... That is why over the last century European civilization has enriched fabulously in material terms, but has become terribly poor spiritually. We now have an unprecedented abundance of goods and an acute shortage of culture, conscience and honor...

###  Anti-culture and anti-harmony

In the winter of 2011 in one of the prestigious cinemas in Riga, a lawyer shot a banker who was eating popcorn and commenting the film very loudly. Shots were fired at the end of the film, when there were captions. Apparently Nikolai Zykov, a 27-year-old graduate of the Police Academy and teacher at the Law Faculty of Latvian University, lost his temper and used a weapon that he possessed quite legally. To be fair we must say that from the very beginning of the film the lawyer tried to persuade the neighbor as he could using words. But, alas, he failed to make the 42-year-old Aĭgara Egle, a senior manager of the bank Citadele, behave civilly.

Of course, a gun is not the best tool to teach good manners, and the lawyer will now have plenty of time to think about it behind bars. The news of this tragi-comic incident quickly spread through the mass media. It is interesting that in newspapers and on TV channels they relished the details of the murder only, but didn't try to dig deeper and analyze the underlying causes of the incident. Perhaps because, in this case, an inevitable partner in crime would appear to be popcorn. However, nobody dared compromise the profitable business. Popcorn is not just a crunchy snack sold in cinemas; in fact it is a packaged rudeness and lack of culture imposed on the audience, as it is impossible to eat without noisy crunching which annoys the people around you. The slogan: «Don't care about others, enjoy yourself! » could be an advertisement for popcorn. About 40-50 years ago it was considered to be impolite to rustle foil or a candy wrapper as it prevented people from watching the film. Nowadays often half the people in the cinema are chewing popcorn and watching movies has become a nightmare for intelligent cinephiles.

Now it follows that, with the cultural degradation, popcorn will come to the theatre and opera. Today it seems impossible, but tomorrow, unfortunately, it could become reality if we can't halt progressive degradation. Half a century ago no-one would believe that the youth not in African, but in European parks would master the wild manner to put legs on benches sitting on its back and polluting seats with muddy boots. No one dares to ask why in bars and cafes or at home they don't sit like that on chairs. Why are people and even the police unable to expel them? Where is this remarkable tolerance to lack of culture coming from?

Unfortunately, a simple truth has been forgotten: a culture of good manners requires considerable effort but savagery comes by itself. It is difficult to illustrate better a cultural degradation of Europeans, than the picture of young people sitting with their feet on benches. Half a century ago they were considered to be not just hooligans, but idiots and they would have been taken not to police, but to a psychiatric clinic. But nowadays such behavior has become the norm.

The progressive degradation is now actively supported. Earlier mass-media and films tried to raise the cultural level of ordinary people, but now they are only dragging it down. It used to be impolite to be uncultured, now many people even boast of their bad manners and wildness. The modern press doesn't touch upon educational topics. It is astonishing to compare what was printed in the old newspapers and magazines of 30-40 years ago, with what readers are fed nowadays. In Russia it is especially noticeable that the most popular periodicals have « yellowed ». Vulgarization of press and television is largely explained by purely commercial considerations. Few people think about educational strategies for the future or the consequences of such suicidal policy. Now, as never before, it would be useful to remember what ancient wise people said about it:

«The destiny of the empire depends on education of the youth »...

Aristotle, Greek philosopher

Of course, nobody likes tedious moralizing and austerity. However, there was much more of this in the past centuries. Children might have been very tired of educational tyranny and when they became adults they tried to be kinder and didn't demand too much from their offspring. So from generation to generation the education of Europeans has become less and less strict and always more soft and indulgent. The level of our standards has decreased dramatically. Perhaps this was the way how the European youth reached modern wildness, gradually and imperceptibly. One of the consequences of the crazy liberalization of education is the loss of communication culture and the collapse of many family traditions existing for centuries. People now communicate less, even with close relatives. That is the main reason why alienation and misunderstanding are growing between Europeans, and instead of natural love we have hatred and malice.

How has the massive influx of poorly educated immigrants from Asia and Africa accelerated cultural degradation? Authorities are unlikely to allow such « politically incorrect » research. But even without formal statistical evidence it is obvious that they had a great influence on loss of dressing etiquette.

Now in Europe, like in China, you can go shopping in underpants or even go on stage in front of a huge audience dresses as such. Earlier Europeans made an effort to dress up and put on their best clothes if they went to the theatre or to a family fete. Now it is considered to be unnecessary. People go to a wedding but dress like they go fishing. There is no notion of smart clothes for many people. Now we are at the era of simplicity on the verge of complete primitiveness. Gorgeous coats - sartorial masterpieces are part of the past. Elegant headcovers are not a compulsory part of the wardrobe anymore. Hats have become a big rarity.

Many years ago one of my friends wasn't allowed to get into a city restaurant without a tie. Those were the rules. But now you can go in any dress to the same restaurant.

Instead of elegant dresses and suits we have plain T-shirts and torn jeans. T-shirts were originally conceived as underwear, but now they have now become regular outerwear. Degradation has touched even the capital of European fashion. Here is a description of the appearance of a modern French woman given by a Russian lady who is a permanent resident of Paris:

There is no style at all

«The constant style is casual, everything is grey, low-key, women are almost always without heels, no makeup, do not shave, often with ungroomed nails, like wearing high boots on bare feet, in winter they wear short jeans shorts and black tights – it is all normal, they like wearing trainers with skirts which looks just «wonderful», or they wear skirts with sport shoes without heels. Both men and women always wear scarves of different shapes and lengths, color and texture (just a cult of scarves). Women like ballet shoes and skinny jeans, all clothes must be practical, of neutral color, often not ironed, from natural cloth. I will make you sad but the famous French style is absent among modern people, especially the young. Only pensioners can be well-dressed with make-up and in high heels. And everybody smokes, smokes a lot, especially women. »

From the point of view of a European esthete, living a hundred years ago, modern Europe just went mad. Rich people dress like ragged fellows, and even when they go to formal receptions they are not ashamed of flaunting in underwear. Modern dancing would surprise the esthete as well. He would say that they look more African, not European. Really, if we look at popular discotheques we could suggest that our culture of dancing has been Africanized in many ways. The very difficult but marvelously graceful movements of the Polonaise have been forgotten a long time ago. Now it can only been seen in films. Even simpler, waltz and tango are danced by few people. Now couples move about clumsily to romantic and sometimes loud undecipherable music, often not even following the correct beat. And now this is called dancing.

There didn't used to be as many radio stations, but classical music was heard more often. Now it is practically impossible to find it on the air. Degradation of European society is in progressing, and musical culture is declining. It is now noticeable even in the most educated countries. Some years ago I was with my friend in the Swedish city of Malmö, which is near the Danish capital of Copenhagen. It was a nice July evening. Among buildings of the old town there was an old church, which touched the sky with its sharp spire. Coming up to it we heard the sounds of organ music. As we read in the note on the door there was a free concert. As it turned out, it didn't happen often. However, when we entered the temple we were amazed by not only a virtuoso level of performance, but also by the emptiness of the hall, barely 10 percent full. Only a few dozen people, mostly elders, were appreciating this beautiful music.

After we left the concert there was a square filled with hundreds of people. All these men and women were just sitting at tables of many cafes and bars situated around the perimeter of the ancient square. They were drinking, eating and chatting about something. In contrast to the church it was impossible to find a free place to sit... It was an amazing paradox: choosing between the rare opportunity of a concert of organ music and constantly working bars, where you can go any day, the majority - more than 90 % - chose the latter. And it was not somewhere in semi-wild and hungry Africa, but in the very center of Europe! In a so-called sophisticated and educated country, where every year prestigious Nobel prizes are awarded for contributions to the development of humanity.

Apart from dressing codes and manner of dancing there is also a culture of speech. Over the last century Europeans are also losing this. Now even aristocrats often speak like uneducated shoemakers. The standard level of European society in this sphere is not increasing but decreasing, sliding down lower and lower to the most primitive level.

Replacing the sublime European culture, which existed for centuries, a poor anticulture is coming. It is all happening against a background of unprecedented scientific and technical progress. A great number of electronic devices have appeared that we couldn't even dream of 20 years ago. The truth is that a significant number of them do not stimulate intellectual development, but rather the dullness of people. Calculators have allowed us to dispense with mental arithmetic. Add to this the dangerous tendency towards computer games, which have become a huge industry nowadays, and which brings billions in profits. Millions of people have already become addicted to this electronic drug. Not only children and teenagers, but adult people as well. Virtual games have become more important for many people than face to face communication with friends and family.

In the beginning of the last century Oswald Spengler – a famous German philosopher, the author of a sensational book «Sunset of Europe » regarded culture as a set of independent elements of different peoples. He thought that they go through their own evolutionary cycle within a few hundred years, and, dying, degenerate into its opposite - civilization. Civilization, as Spengler understood it, is contrasted to culture. He regarded it as a new stage of development where dead, inhuman technicism becomes more important than creativity.

This theory, of course, is not perfect, although something has already been confirmed by today's reality. Technological advances have allowed to reduce the cost of film-making significantly, but ultimately it contributes not to flourishing of cinema but to its degradation. There are many more films now, but their professional level deteriorated significantly and sometimes it just can't be compared to the works of the masters of past times. It means that technical progress doesn't facilitate culture, but counteracts it. Technique is becoming more complicated and fantastic, but people in arts become more talentless...

Cinema is not an art anymore

«There are no films. Instead of films now we have movies. It is not an art. It is a part of show-business. Everything related to show-business has nothing to do with art (it goes by the name of «show-business»). In the 1990-s Fellini and Tarkovsky could not have existed: they would have nothing to do with either show or business, they couldn't be sold»

Alexander Tarasov, Russian sociologist and culturologist

Mass culture leads to degradation

«In the 1950-s Jack Pollok painted a black canvas and said: «Look, here is a painting!». Then artists could do without canvases at all - so there was a conceptual direction. Music has become more and more like abstract noise. Literature has also turned out to be in an ideological impasse for some time. Practically all possibilities were tested – innovation has become almost impossible. So, art has reached its limit, where it has to stop, turn back and discover itself once again, look at itself from the other side. This coming back allows for plenty of possibilities, because – have a look: any equipment is now accessible to all creativity. And what is going on? Films are destroying themselves. We are not developing, we are deteriorating ».

Robert Makki, famous movie figure, slon.ru

Visually, the most noticeable degradation is in architecture. If a hundred years ago even factories looked like palaces, now - on the contrary, palaces look like factories. It seems that the concept of aesthetics simply ceased to exist for many architects. Since 1970 we can easily see the principle of aesthetics slowly giving way to a rising cult of ugliness.

The opening of the super modern palace of the National center of art and culture named after Georges Pompidou in Paris (Le Centre National d'Art et de Culture Georges Pompidou) became one of the most well-known and noticeable manifestations of this trend. It is commonly referred to the Beaubourg. In order to maximize the usable area, the designers brought out all communications, including plumbing, outside. At the time this decision was considered to be very brave and functional. The architects' bold design, however, leaves much to be desired in the comfort, efficiency and functionality of the building. At least it is known that in winter freezing water pipes bring the Administration of the Centre Beaubourg a lot of problems, and I don't think they are delighted about such a bold decision. Few people dare argue about the beauty and aesthetic dignity of this cultural center, enlaced with pipes and wiring and more resembling a chemical or oil refinery plant.

The National center of art and culture named after Georges Pompidou is not in harmony with the beautiful buildings of the 20th century situated nearby. Defenders of such an architectural avant-garde, perhaps, will say that the building looks original due to its vivid contrast. But if buildings such Beaubourgs were everywhere in Paris, the city would likely lose its title of architectural pearl. Tourists come here not to look at such modern «masterpieces», but Paris which was created a hundred or more years ago, when beauty and harmony were highly prized.

Movement of architectural styles

« I have formulated a theory of degradation when I was thinking about the history of architecture. Clear chronological movement of architectural styles from wonderful and sublime to more and more low and ugly should have had a logical explanation. Antiquity, Empire, Gothic, Baroque, art Nouveau... constructivism... deconstructivism... The answer was obvious. Normal people are not able to create and contemplate ugly architectural forms. Degradation of architectural styles could only testify to the degradation of the human beings who created them.

Oleg Sikorskiy, «Theory of degradation People are worse than beasts

###  People have become worse than beasts

Customs and traditions of Ancient Greece would seem wild now. In Sparta weak newborn children were thrown from a cliff. Love of adult men (as a rule teachers and tutors) for teenage boys was perceived as sublime, but love for a woman was considered to be earthly and necessary only for reproduction. Even more, they believed that courage and wisdom of men were given to boys through the male seed.

In modern society rules have changed dramatically. In the USA and many other countries of Europe the fight against pedophilia has gained an unprecedented scale. According to modern rules a significant part of male population of Greece during the time of Plato and Hippocrates, would have gone to prison for many, many years.

Children are taken care of in a touching way, it seems. The rich society is ready to support any downs and freaks; it can spend huge amounts of money to extend life of a very weak or terminally ill child. Sometimes parents use the Internet and television to ask for help and money is collected as donation. It is perceived as a real triumph of humanism.

The truth is that this idyllic picture fades considerably when one remembers that, at the same time, our allegedly humane society takes the lives of millions of babies by abortion. And in most cases these babies are not inferior or potential freaks of nature, but healthy and maybe even genius children. Never in all the history of Europe have so many new lives been terminated as it was done in this last half century. So, in fact, nowadays it is not a triumph of humanism which dominates, but a triumph of savagery and monstrous cruelty, disguised by hypocritical rhetoric.

Now we have a paradox situation: on the one hand, the juvenile justice system severely persecutes even the slightest violence against children, and parents do not dare touch their own children, but mothers are allowed to go unpunished even as they kill their unborn babies unpunished. It is done within a so called programme of «family planning». In the same way, a long time ago Adolf Hitler «planned» the fate of the Jewish population of Europe...

We are horrified by the crimes of another tyrant – Stalin. During the great terror in the late '30s every region of the Soviet Union got quotas for shooting. Let's say, in town X they wanted to shoot 5000 people. Sometimes local authorities asked Stalin to increase their death quotas. Now in Russia adult people are not shot like that anymore, but babies are killed much more often without any limits. This terror against the smallest and the most helpless has been going on in Europe for a few decades!

Why is one sent to prison for the murder of a newborn baby, but taking the life of an unborn child is encouraged by many European states as they finance abortions? Tell me: what is the difference for the baby? What is the reason for taking his life? Tell me; what is the difference for the baby what is the reason for taking his life? For him it makes no difference when and under what signboard his life is going to be taken. The most widespread excuse in defense of such barbarity is that the conceived baby is not a person yet. So there seems to be no crime. But is it really so? Back in the '40s and '50s this topic could be argued back and forth but since the '70-s this issue has become quite clear due to modern scientific and technical achievements.

The beginning of life

«From the point of view of modern biology (genetics and embryology) the life of a human being, as a biological individual, starts from the moment when the nuclei of male and female reproductive cells merge and form a single nucleus containing a unique genetic material. During the whole prenatal development a new human body cannot be part of the mother's body. It can't be compared to an organ or a part of an organ of the mother's body. So it is obvious that abortion at any stage of pregnancy is the intentional termination of a life as a biological individual»

Vladimir Golichenkov, professor of the Department of Embryology, Faculty of Biology of Moscow state university, za-zhizn.ru

Here are indisputable facts, as identified by scientific research: between the 18th and 25th day from the moment of conception (3 weeks of pregnancy) the heart of the baby starts beating. By the 20th day the basis of the nervous system is formed. After five and a half weeks the baby starts moving his head, and at six weeks he can move the whole body just as a born baby. A woman will feel these movements only much later, in the 16th - 20th weeks. When the baby is 43 days old one can take an encephalogram of the brain. At 9 - 10 weeks of pregnancy the baby can already move his eyes, chew, move his tongue, hiccup, he can be awake or asleep. By the 11th week he sucks his thumb, reacts to music or outer noise, which can wake him up. By the 11th -12th week he has nails, by the 16th week he has eyelashes. From the 10th -11th weeks of pregnancy all systems of the body are already working.

It is interesting to note that the ancient Chinese people and Mongols calculated the intrauterine existence of the baby in his total number of years lived. Accordingly, by modern standards of calculation, the famous Genghis Khan lived only 65 years, and not 66 as they believed. Modern perceptions of the foetus and status as proof of a new life differ greatly not only from that of Ancient Chineese but also from scientific observation, an in its sanctimony comes to the point of absurdity. In different countries there are different times in the course of its development when the human foetus is officially when the human infant is recognized as a person.

In France the unborn child's life is protected by the state laws 10 weeks after conception; in Denmark - 12 weeks; and in Sweden, the most feministic country, only after 20. This means that a five month old foetus, who can hear music and move inside his mother, is not recognized as a human being according to Swedish laws.

But it is not the toughest approach. In many countries the life of a baby is legally protected only after his birth. There are even famous people, who offer to go further and to protect the life of a child only after three days following birth. Why such a delay? Probably, in order to give mothers a chance to throw away with impunity the newborn baby in the garbage disposal or drown it as an unnecessary puppy. Indeed, in some Russian hospitals, where late abortions were performed, babies born alive were drowned in a basket especially prepared for that purpose. This fact was told in one of the programs by a deputy of the Russian Parliament, medical doctor Viktor Sharapov.

Can you imagine what will to life could the baby have, who was torn by medical forceps from his mother's wombs, but he didn't die and managed to be born alive? But unfortunately not to have a bright life and for genius inventions, but only to be drown in a basket. Tell me, can the society that lets this happen to be called normal, humane and civilized?

The country of murderers

«It is not the murder itself that terrifies, but the fact that it has become so commonplace that everyone has gotten used to it. It has become the way to earn money: to kill a child costs ...a certain amount ... It is the same door in the women's consultation for a woman to save a child or to kill him. And it is done by well educated people who consider themselves quite enlightened. The horrifying thing is that Holy Russia has turned into a country of murderers who do not understand what they are doing. People have become worse than beasts.

Families with many children are hated! If a woman who has this right comes to a shop without waiting for her turn in line, the crowd of murderers starts yelling: No, don't do her any favors! She shouldn't have given birth to so many children! » She should have killed them all just as everyone else did. !»

From a sermon by the Archpriest of the Orthodox Church Dimitry Smirnov

Perhaps the assessment given by the cleric of the Orthodox Church seems too harsh. But not only for the babies, who are torn apart in the womb of the mother today, thrown into the rubbish chute or sunk in the carefully prepared buckets. Has anyone of you would like to be in their place???
Chapter 4.

###  Crisis within the Christian Church

Deserted temples * The forgotten Kingdom of Love * Why Islam is setting in

###  Deserted temples

The influence of the Christian Church in European society has fallen dramatically in the last hundred years. We can see this even in Italy which is considered to be one of the most religious countries in Europe. More than 90 per cent of the population call themselves Catholics. Christian basilicas of Rome impress with their richness and splendor. With a population of 3 million the city has about 300 churches or approximately 10 thousand parishioners per place of worship. Yet, even on weekends, they are nearly empty and filled mostly by tourists. Under the arches, which can accommodate several thousand worshippers, even at Sunday service you will see not more than a hundred local residents.

It wasn't always so. Christian temples used to be filled to capacity, gathering parishioners from all over the neighborhood. People there not only prayed, but also communicated with each other, exchanging news. Now only one percent of Europeans go to church service regularly. It is a fact that more than half of the French have never prayed in their lives. The situation is not better in other countries. Europeans come to a temple not to talk to God, but only for weddings or funerals. Beautiful Christian rituals still keep their attractiveness. However, due to the lack of parishioners many Christian churches in Europe are closed down or re-assigned.

A restaurant in a church

«Many-colored luminous stained glass with biblical motifs, in the former Church of St. Martin in Bielefeld, still remains of the original construction. Once a religious building constructed in 1898, it now has a new purpose: dark oak benches have been taken out, exterior walls are painted in grey, red and gold colors, and there is a bar where before there used to be an organ. A former Evangelical church has been turned into a restaurant. Europe is experiencing a boom in sales of deserted Catholic and Protestant churches. Because of the absence of parishioners, dioceses and Church communities are forced to put up the buildings at auctions as objects of municipal property. In houses a Willingen a church has become a café. The Church of St. John in Weil-am-Rheine now houses a city library, and in the village church in Brandenburg Mallow, constructed 200 years ago, there is a branch of the Savings Bank».

Newspaper «Die Welt»

Parishes are being closed

«Europe is experiencing a boom in sales of deserted Catholic and Protestant churches. The situation in the Czech Republic is the most catastrophic of all European states. In the past ten years the attendance rate in congregations has decreased from 41 to 27%. On one site alone of the Czech Catholic diocese there are more than 50 churches which are being sold. In France, over the last 30 years, one in every two parish has been closed because of lack of churchgoers. The Catholic Church in England over the last ten years lost half a million of its congregation, and in Ireland the attendance at holy service has declined by a third since 1992. In the Netherlands there are 19 thousand working churches, but every year the number is decreasing by a thousand. According to sociological surveys, Sweden and Norway have the leading number of atheists - only 11% of the population attends Churches.»

«The news of the week », RTR.

In Russia the most large-scale closing of temples took place during the October socialist revolution. In the 1920's a fierce struggle with religion started in the USSR, as communists denounced it as « the opium of the people». Authorities closed almost all the temples. More than 93 per cent! Crosses were often ripped from domes, church bells were smashed, and icons were burned. Many churches were turned into clubs, warehouses and even industrial workshops.

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the reverse process took place. For the last twenty years many religious buildings have been returned to the Orthodox Church. As a result the number of churches and monasteries in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, where the Moscow Patriarchate dominates, have increased manifold. But, alas, the number of parishioners has not increased much. Temples are almost as empty, as in other countries of Europe, and this fact creates serious problems for poor Church communities.

Revelations of a priest

«The satanic trick is that church communities are not able to support most of the churches, which represent a value as cultural monuments. These temples were built using funds from the state or princes, lords, rich merchants or industrialists. They stretch to the sky - it is very beautiful, but it costs a fortune to heat them.

Behind the return (of churches) there is always the possibility of or the opportunity for embezzlement, because it is just impossible to support the returned property. There can be embezzlement of public funds in the form of direct subsidies, in the form of taxes - embezzlement of public funds, that is, violation of the commandment «do not steal».

It is a hoax to consider restoration of temples as a spiritual matter. If a temple is a monument of culture, it deserves restoration and care, but as a monument of culture, not religion. If the temple is ugly but there are believers - let it be a temple. If there are no believers – it can be demolished and sold. In Europe it happens all the time.

The gospel returns to this topic many times, because Jesus was crucified exactly for religious extremism – he wanted to demolish the Church. The Lord Jesus Christ loved the Temple as the House of God, but he saw the temple in every person. Man is a temple not made by hands».

Yaakov Krotov, priest, grani.ru

Two thousand years ago Jesus Christ smashed the merchant's shops and was ready to destroy the temple as it had been turned into a Bazaar. If he were in Russia nowadays, he would have a lot to do! Commercial activities in Orthodox churches have reached unprecedented proportions. They have no compunction about making money in the Great Cathedral of Christ the Savior in Moscow. Its premises are rented out for presentations, entertainment shows and feasts. It seems some of the clergy worship not Christ, but Mammon. So few people recognize the Church as a school of morality.

The people's opinion

Two polls were conducted in Gide Park. In the first one all people - religious and non-religious - were asked the following question: «What is a Russian Orthodox Church for you?» People were offered different answers. «Business community» was the answer which was chosen by the majority of the survey participants – a whopping 55%! Only 16 % answered that it is a «Community of believers in God». Other possible answers for churchgoers included the following: « The Union of spiritual mentors », «An example of perfection », «Emergency psychological help» and « School of morality » but no one chose these answers at all! Even more disturbing was that 7 % of respondents accepted the Russian Orthodox Church as « one of the departments of the Federal Security Service » . There are ridiculous rumors on the Internet that the head of the ROC is a FSB general. All this information reveals the people's lack of trust or mistrust of Church representatives.

Church Fathers are trumpeting the miraculous rebirth of Orthodoxy in Russia. In recent years the influence of the Church has, indeed, noticeably increased; but not so much on people, as much as on government authorities. Ruling leaders actively support rapid construction of new temples. Rich oligarchs and businessmen are often coerced into financing these projects, especially in big cities. In the center of Kaliningrad - former German Konigsberg - a new temple now stands with shining golden domes, its size could compete with the Basilica of Notre Dame de Paris. At first sight it appears to be an impressive testament to the reawakening of the Christian faith in Russia. But it is only an illusion. Inside, the temple looks like a deserted railway station. This is not unique; it is not the only place of worship in such a situation.

Eyewitness testimonial

I have been to their new Temples. There are a lot of them. They are pompous and ...empty. There were 3 people at the evening service in Vitebsk in the huge Uspensky Cathedral.

Olga Skvortsova, gidepark.ru

So these are the temples of today. Behind their bright golden outer covering there is a gaping emptiness, reflecting the current situation in Christianity today quite accurately. The Russian Orthodox Church has initiated construction of 200 new temples in residential areas of Moscow. What if they suffer the same fate as the Cathedral of St. Sophia in Constantinople, which was converted into a mosque after the capture of Christian Byzantium by the Muslims?

To be fair, we should note that many Russian people (up to 30 % according to recent surveys) have lost faith in the rotten and corrupt leadership. For them, all hopes for the revival of Russia are connected with the Orthodox Church. Strategists of «The Project Russia» stand for the sharp increase in the influence of the Church reaching the clerical ruling of the country. The project is described in series of books. Of course, if the Patriarch starts to rule the country, de facto, the temples will not be empty any more – people will be forced to attend. They could do this in Russia but what will happen next? How will the Orthodox Church be able to solve demographic problems and stop the disastrous decline of the Russian population? Will it prohibit abortions and encourage an increase in birthrate?

A worrisome problem is that the population of women in Russia exceeds that of men by nearly 11 million and the figure is constantly growing. What should we do with all these unhappy brides-to be? How can they experience the happiness of motherhood?? In Muslim countries, where there is polygamy, they don't have such problems. But how can single women give birth to children within the framework of Christian morality? According to the Christian faith there is no other way but to send all 11 million to monasteries. Only there they are unlikely to find the Kingdom of love, Jesus spoke about

###  A forgotten Kingdom of Love

What is the greatest commandment of Christ? To love! Not only God but people around you. « Love the nearest to you as you love yourself» He taught. Unfortunately, few people follow this commandment nowadays. Millions of people wear crosses around their necks, pray, strictly observe Lent, celebrate all religious holidays and quite sincerely believe themselves to be real Christians. But are they really? Most of them do not comply with the BASIC commandment of Jesus.

Today few people live in love, but a lot of people live in malice and hatred even towards those people who have done nothing wrong to them. This anger devours people from the inside and undermines their own health. Can we consider priests, who incite enmity and hatred to coreligionists, to be real Christians? After all, worshipping the same God and his commandments is much more important than some discrepancies in the Church canons and rituals.

Christ exhorted his followers to «love one another », but instead, so-called «Christians» began to maim and kill each other, shedding rivers of blood during the numerous wars of religion. Witness to this was the massacre of the St Barthélémy in Paris, when Catholics exterminated thousands of Protestants treacherously and ruthlessly, sparing neither women nor children! Jesus would have been horrified by this.

The history of Christianity is not the history of the triumph of love, but rather the chronicle of endless schisms and fierce animosity between people of the same religion. The most important division of Christianity into Catholic and Orthodox happened about one thousand years ago. The reason for splitting up was not ideological. The Pope, who dominated in Western Europe and didn't suffer from modesty, proclaimed himself the Vicar of Christ and wanted new territories. He demanded submission of the Metropolitan of Constantinople, who was head of the Eastern Christian Church. The matter ended with mutual curses and a final schism.

The Words of Jesus Christ

«Everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for each other».

The Gospel of Matthew

That was the specific «love for each other» of Christian leaders. At all times they cared more about the struggle for power than the observance of the first commandment.

In the 16th century many Europeans rejected the Catholic Church and condemned the remission of sins for money by selling indulgences. As a result of reformation Protestants appeared who supported new directions believing that Catholicism had departed from the original Christian principles. In the middle of the 17th century there was a schism in the Orthodox Church of Russia. Supporters of old traditions, who didn't agree with Church reform of the Patriarch, started to call themselves old believers. Many of them fled from persecution to the outskirts to the borders of the country.

For many centuries Catholic priests used to read sermons in Latin, an obscure language for the vast majority of people, and only in the middle of the 20th century did they start to use modern languages. Orthodox priests still speak in Church Slavonic language from the pulpit which is not very comprehensible for ordinary people. Unlike Latin, which was a living language in Ancient Rome, Church Slavonic was specially invented for Orthodox divine services, as if they were deliberately trying to make the word of God inaccessible for people.

Why do Christians who believe in one God celebrate their religious holidays on different dates? When one country is fasting and preparing for Communion other ones are already in full feast. This nonsense is kept alive through the efforts of several Orthodox churches, including the Russian, Georgian, Serbian, Jerusalem and Ethiopian. For some reason they stubbornly continue to adhere to the long-obsolete calendar, which is behind the modern one by two weeks and which was rejected by the whole world a long time ago. However, this is not the only contradiction tearing the followers of Jesus apart.

Now there are several major Christian churches and more than 20 thousand (!!!) sects. The doctrine of Christ is interpreted in as many different ways as they wish. Many followers of Jesus require strict monogamy and even complete celibacy for the clergy (Catholics), while others believe in polygamy (Mormons). While some «disciples of the Savior» organized «divine» orgies (whippings), others castrate themselves for the love of God (eunuchs).

For two thousand years of its history the doctrine of Christ has been repeatedly distorted and falsified. The first serious adjustments were made in the days of Ancient Rome, whose rulers persecuted the early Christians for three centuries. However, in the 4th century the doctrine of the Son of God, revolutionary in its essence, was turned into the official Imperial religion. It is clear that such an amazing metamorphosis could not happen without very serious adjustments of many of its bases. This was confirmed upon examination of correspondence which has survived to this day between influential figures of Ancient Rome. In one of the letters, where they discussed the idea of turning Christianity into the official religion, they explicitly stated that it would undoubtedly require vast changes in its teaching.

This was done under Emperor Constantine. In 313 A.D. he stopped the persecution of Christians and allowed them to own property, temples and cemeteries. And very soon after just 11 years Christianity became the state religion of Rome. The following year, in 325 A.D., the First Ecumenical Council of Christians took place under the auspices of Constantine. There, the Emperor decided questions of dogma and intervened in all the Affairs of the Church, even though he was a pagan, not a Christian at that time. He retained the title of divine, that is, he himself was considered a God, and was the head of the pagan cults. The Emperor was baptized shortly before his death. So why did «Church Fathers» humbly obey the heathen? Most likely, they were just bought out. After all, during the reign of Constantine Christian priests de facto became officials. They were paid and didn't pay taxes, as all officials in the Empire. In many ways it led to a withdrawal from the ideals of early Christianity. So instead of openness and wealth-sharing between the first Christian communities and abolition of private property there was prodigious accumulation of wealthy temples and monstrous greed of bishops. Christianity quickly adapted to serve the empire and eventually was overgrown with dogmas, cults and mysteries, which originally didn't exist. Many of the ideas of Christ were essentially betrayed. The apostle Paul wrote: "All power is from God," though Jesus taught the opposite. Christ spoke of the equality of women, but Paul called women "a vessel of sin."

It becomes clear why the teachings of Christ have survived only in retellings of the apostles. We do not know of any text written by the hand of Christ... was the son of God illiterate? Probably anything he might have written was very different from the stories of his disciples. Maybe that is why the texts of the Savior haven't survived. God willing, in time, something will be found during the archaeological excavations of the Holy Land, or in some secret Vatican archives....

The Kingdom of Heaven is in our hearts

«Complete indifference to the doctrine, cults, priests and theology - that is the Christian life! The Kingdom of Heaven is a state of your heart (it is said about children, that the Kingdom of Heaven belongs to them), and not something ascended over the Earth. The Kingdom of God won't come in a chronological and historical sense, not on an exact day of the calendar, not that it was not there yesterday, but it is today. The Kingdom of God comes as a change in hearts of individuals - something that comes all the time and has not come yet. »

Friedrich Nietzsche, "The Antichrist"

Caught in a spider web

«...Among the earliest followers of Jesus, many of them lived in accordance with these teachings. But at the same time, as it became more widespread, and the so-called educated classes of that time began to be interested in it (instead of just living by its rules), it was strangled by a web of foreign elements, like a tree braided by the ivy, putting its common Central postulates to death .As a result, Christianity became the melting pot of these old truths and countless new borrowings - from Greek philosophy, mysticism and diverse community rituals of near and distant peoples. During the reign of later emperors it became the official religion of Rome, having signed a disastrous Union with Power - with an attitude that was diametrically opposed to everything that Jesus spoke and taught. »

Otto Kiefer, «Sexual life in Ancient Rome»

The story of the appearance of the main symbol of modern Christianity namely the cross with the crucifixion of Jesus is interesting and in many ways revealing. According to researchers neither the Savior himself, neither his disciples revered the cross nor crossed themselves .Historians did not find any evidence that the first Christians had a cult of the cross. In the Roman catacombs where the early Christians gathered there were paintings of fish, peacocks, eagles, and doves on the walls. Even Christ himself was originally depicted as a meek lamb – a Lamb of God. The cross, this terrible instrument of shameful death of the Savior, caused only fear and terror among the early Christians.

The adoration of the Cross comes to Christianity in a definitive way only in the 4th century under the reign of Emperor Constantine. This was largely influenced by his mother, Empress Helena. She was one of the first who made a pilgrimage to Jerusalem and there, allegedly, under a thick layer of earth, miraculously found a divine relic - the Cross of the Savior. After that, crosses were declared miraculous, and they started to designate holy days in their honor.

However, Elena's finding seems to be one of the greatest mystifications in the history of mankind. Of course we can accept that old logs, somehow miraculously, didn't rot for three hundred years after the execution of Christ. It is quite strange that the logs were buried instead of used as firewood. What is really hard to comprehend is how the Empress could have guessed and known, without any doubt, these logs to be the very ones used in the martyrdom of Christ.

However that is not the main issue; the question is in the shape of the cross. The fact is that Romans didn't usually use crosses to crucify Christians. For crucifixions they used crosses in the shape of the Greek letter T which were much easier to build. A famous Russian archeologist, Earl Alexei Uvarov spoke about it as did many other researchers.

As far as the usual cross is concerned, people have used it since ancient times all over the world. Objects decorated with crosses were found among the ruins of Sumerian and Babylonian cities of Mesopotamia, as well as in India, Syria, and Persia. The cross was revered by Indians of America, ancient Egyptians and followers of Buddhism. The cult of the cross was inherent in many European Gentiles. Therefore, it was easier to convert people to Christianity under the usual symbol.

But why did «the Fathers of the Church»- known theologians, kindly treated by Emperor Constantine, «perfect » the ancient sign in such a strange way? Why did they artificially unite the cross with a crucifix and create a truly frightening symbol of Christianity? Quite possibly they wanted the perceived image of the Martyr, nailed to logs, to instill fear and humility in the people. The rulers of the Empire needed this to keep the people in check. Yet it did not correspond to the teachings of Christ, who preached the cult of love, not the cult of death and suffering. He would hardly have approved of this; indeed he would have been rather horrified.

Some Protestants consider crucifixion to be intrigues of the devil. Incredibly most Catholics and Orthodox are not even aware of the contradiction of such a symbol, which does not reflect the basic commandment of Jesus – Love. What symbol would they have if the Roman procurator Pontius Pilate had sentenced the Savior to be hanged instead?! In this case, case, Empress Helena would have dug up 300-year-old «holy» gallows. What is going to be next? One might attempt to imagine Christian temples "decorated" with Christ hanging from gallows. Do you think it is absolutely absurd? I do. But what is the difference between crucifixion and gallows? Only that execution is more painful...

###  Why Islam is setting in

The number of mosques in Europe is increasing exponentially. For example, in 1970 there were only three of them in Germany, but now there are more than two thousand five hundred today! In some European cities mosques are already not big enough to accommodate all those wishing to fall prostrate in front of Allah, and then hundreds of Muslims spread mats and pray directly on pavements and in nearby streets. This impressive picture shocks many Europeans who practice a different religion. Why is Christianity losing ground to Islam?? Why do Christian churches dismay by their emptiness during holy services, while Islamic mosques, even in Europe, are filled to capacity every Friday? Why is nothing heard about Muslims who converted to Christianity, but it is known that thousands of native Europeans embrace Islam.

There are a lot of explanations for this, but there is one very serious reason that goes almost unnoticed. The essence of it is that Islam is much closer to people in what matters to them. The greatest paradox is that the morals of modern European societies are much freer than Muslims', but regarding sexual relations Christianity is much more conservative than Islam. After all, sex in Islam is recognized as one of the ways to worship God. Islam comes from quite realistic and rational considerations about the person, not ignoring his natural inclinations. They understand that it is irrational to make impossible demands of man. Unlike Christianity, Islam does not consider intimate life something sordid and sinful.

The Quran says: «Your wives are a Tilth for you, walk to your field when you want to...» Muslims claim that Islam does not impose taboos about sex, because in this religion there are no taboos about subjects – but there are prohibited actions. Islam puts forth that people should feel free to discuss physical needs they are experiencing. Muslims believe that life is not divided into dirty, shameful, bad on the one hand, and holy, religious, spiritual on the other.

Among major world religions Christianity is, perhaps, the most antisexual. And this is not the «making » of the Savior but the Church Fathers, many of whom were adapting the doctrine in accordance with their own sexist and sexual complexes. As a result, even Orthodox Judaism gives way to sexual rigor. However these restrictions often backfire, resulting in the opposite behaviour, and, ultimately, instead of divine glory they only bring shame. It is a well-known fact that, celibacy in Catholicism contributed to the spread of pedophilia among Holy Fathers, sparking scandalous revelations and causing a catastrophic decline in the authority of the Church.

Many do not understand why procreation - the conception of a person - in Christianity is not considered holy but instead sinful. Why spouses are even called to abstain from sex. Medical professionals have proven long ago that it is harmful for health. It turns out, that the Lord, having invented only this vicious way of reproduction pushes people into sin. Unlike Islam which allows to have sex whenever you want, in Christianity there are a lot of invented restrictions

Love is banned?

«It was considered a sin to make love in the afternoon, before dinner and after breakfast; you cannot do it during the Holy Week, on fast days, during the Great Lent, during pregnancy and a certain period after giving birth, during the night before and after attending Church, an hour before and an hour after prayer, the reading of Psalms or the Scripture.

Some priests introduced additions to these rules, including one very strange, which demanded sexual abstinence three days and three nights after the wedding. In the end, the couple that decided to follow all the commandments about sexual prohibitions and regular visits to Church would never join in physical intimacy. »

Barbara Cartland, «The Mystery of Love through the Prism of History»

It is obvious that the doctrine of Christ has been distorted beyond recognition for many centuries by numerous interpreters warring amongst themselves to the point of absurdity. For example, the dominating rule today identifies love with God, and sex with the devil. It is not surprising that in many literary works sexual desire is interpreted as «the «devil's» temptation. In the story of the world famous writer Lev Tolstoy «Father Sergius» a woman tries to seduce the Prince who had become a monk and hermit. Probably, in an attempt to quell his natural sexual needs, he chopped one of his fingers. Only by doing such a horrible thing was he able to restrain himself from «devilish» temptation. However, in real life it was even worse. Not only fingers were chopped off, but even penises. In some Christian sects sexuality grew into a monstrous antisexual marasmus. The speech is, first of all, about eunuchs, who voluntarily castrated themselves in the name of Christ. Not only men, but also women.

Castration in the name of Christ

«During the main ceremony, eunuchs were striving not only for the transformation of the flesh and through this attains salvation, but also the kind of suffering associated with torture on the cross. Like the Flagellants during the European Middle Ages, eunuchs wanted to experience the pain of the Savior. They saw themselves as "followers of Christ". And as eunuchs imagined ... the Crucifixion as castration, they believed that their "imitation" was exactly the same torment that Christ had had to experience. "

Laura Engelshtein, history professor at the University of Ielsk

Eunuchs and the Kingdom of Heaven

«You can, apparently, assume that the same religious movement could appear in the end of 18th and 19th centuries in Germany. We speak of the religious activity of George Rapp (1757 - 1847), "weaver and amateur preacher" who castrated himself and was charged with emasculating his son and a few other people».

«...For those who believed in «the infinite kingdom of eunuchs on the earth" that will come when "there will be 144 000 of them" it was quite natural to try to castrate as many people as possible. ».

«As for the castration of women, it apparently appeared a little later (in the early decades of the 19th century) and implied a greater variety of surgical procedures. There were five types of operations performed on women who decided to be eunuchs: «cutting, etching or burning of nipples»; «amputation of a part of the breasts... or total amputation of one or both breasts (the latter was much more common) »; «different cuts, mainly on both breasts»; «cutting parts of the small lips, alone or together with the clitoris»; «cutting the top of the big lips, together with the small ones and the clitoris». The most common type of female castration was, apparently, amputation of both breasts».

Alexandr Panchenko,«Christism and eunuchism »

Some of Christ's teachings were interpreted into amazing horror, and how far it all was from His true words. After all, when one of the apostles asked what to do if desire (lust) was overwhelming and prevented from concentrating on work, Jesus said, "It is better to marry than to burn with passion." He did not call for abstention and especially not castration.

Apart from immortality of the soul there is immortality of flesh. In every man there is a part of someone who lived hundreds of years ago. The part of those living now can gain immortality only by having children. Our eternal life is in our children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren! The blissful merger of two bodies is an act of immortality, gifted to us by God.

Why would the Holy conception of a new life and continuation of the race be considered to be a vice? Why do European cultures consider the name of reproductive organs and the act itself to be vituperative and obscene? Love is God, for it is said in the Gospel: "Whoever does not love, does not know God, because God is love." Therefore, the approval that "Love is a sin!" leads to the logical conclusion that "God is a sin".

The phenomenon of love

«What is remarkable in Christian literature and in teachings of the Church is that they didn't account for the phenomenon of love and said nothing interesting about it. The literature of Christian theologians on the subject of marriage and the family is amazingly sparse and superficial. The Treatise of St. Patara Methodius «Feast of ten virgins» is wretched and banal. Half of it is a description of physiological processes, and half is praise to virginity. Noticeably absent are deep and meaningful analyses of the problems of sex and marriage .The Treatise of the Blessed is impossible to read as it reeks of the spirit of philistinism. In fact, treatises about marriage by Saint Augustine and others are treatises about the organization of tribal life and read like manuals about cattle breeding. There is no mention of individual intimacy or destiny, which is absolutely absent in these writings. No-one speaks of the phenomenon of love, which is completely different from the phenomenon of physiological satisfaction of sexual desire, and the organization of the social life of the family. The reality of love was, probably considered to belong to the realm of poetry or mysticism which evoked suspicion. »

Nikolay Berdyaev, philosopher, «The destiny of man»

Throughout the centuries love and sexuality have been very important for individuals. However, the attitude towards them changed a lot in different periods of history. Whereas in ancient times pagan religions worshipped sex and reproductive organs, built temples of love and were engaged in the sexual education of youth, Christianity still views sex as obscene and sinful and continue to drag this subject in the mud.

If people are not taught sexual culture, they turn to sexual wildness. If thirsty young people are not given clean water, they start drinking from a puddle. Indeed, prohibitions will never quench thirst! As a result Europe sank into the ocean of pornography and wild debauchery. Huge money is made on godless sexual exploitation of natural human needs. Cheap pornography takes the lion's share of traffic on the Internet. People inflame their passions, but often do not receive even the most basic knowledge that would help them create harmony in personal life, to save their family and happiness.

It is believed that the Church is the guardian of morals and ethics. Yet bans and rigor often result in the opposite effect. About twenty years ago, the Russian Orthodox Church was strongly against sex education in schools, and banned it, although in polls 82 percent of parents supported teaching this subject. What result have we got now? Are there any improvements? Quite the opposite, in terms of Christian morals the situation has only worsened. Now young people in Russia begin having sex earlier than anywhere else in Europe. In Germany and other countries where sex education in schools is compulsory (no matter the opinion of parents), the situation is much better.

However, Orthodox patriarchs intentionally ignore this information and don't want to know about it. The clergy was not satisfied with the complete prohibition of sex education in Russia. They reacted by introducing a new subject "Fundamentals of Orthodox culture" in secondary schools, although it contradicts the country's Constitution and essentially serves not to consolidate, but rather split and confront the multinational and multi-confessional Russia. What should children of Catholics and Protestants, Jews and Muslims learn at these lessons? And what should their parents do? Should they resent, protest or create different schools according to religious convictions?

Students would prefer studying «Basics of sexual culture» to «Fundamentals of Orthodox culture». A compromise between Church and sexual educators could become «Lessons of love» instead of «Fundamentals of Orthodoxy». During these lessons they could not only speak about the main commandment of Christ, but also discuss attitudes towards love in different religions and in different historical periods. In the section "Art of Love" they can talk not only about intimate intricacies, but also about the psychology of the relationship between men and women. As well, they can reflect on love of children, parents and the outside world. It is interesting that almost all students have persistent allergies to the words "morality" and "moralizing". At the same time, the word "Love" is much more attractive.

The domination of Christian dogmas has led to the banishment of sexual culture from the civilized world for many centuries. While in science, art or engineering Europeans have accumulated knowledge and experience of many generations and have passed it all to the younger generation, the same thing doesn't happen concerning intimacy, where there are only prohibitions, ignorance and almost primitive wildness. Those who have learned the art of love have taken their understanding to the grave. At the same time, the art of killing has been handed and perfected from generation to generation. It was considered obscene to teach young people the art of love, but transmitting the art of killing was the norm. In the world, and especially in Russia, there are a great number of military academies; there is not a single Academy of Love yet.

Sexuality has been separated from spirituality

« The brightest, sweetest and most sensual, the most joyous, the most beautiful thing that a man can have is called a sin. Even those parts of the body that touch and give us the peak of pleasure and enjoyment have become dirty, become the embodiment of sin.

... So it turns out that the body (it is what God created!) has become sinful. The body has been separated from the soul; sexuality has been separated from spirituality. That is a tremendous mistake, in my opinion. Therefore corruptions, vulgarity, double standards, lies, fear, shame, feelings of inadequacy thrive. Hence there is anger, aggression, violence, internal rebellion....

Ideologists of Christianity completely ignored the valuable directive of God to people: « Make love,go forth and multiply! » After all, God has provided us with the only way of reproduction! It is the sexual union of a man and a woman. In order to preserve the human race, God has gifted mankind with the greatest enjoyment of their bodies and mutual attraction to each other. »

Lev Teternikov, «Management of sexual energy »

There is a considerable share of guilt of the Christian Church in the responsibility of the demographic catastrophe and crisis of the family. Too much is built on lies and hypocrisy in the relation of the Church with the people as well as in relationships between men and women. During their wedding ceremony couples vow marital fidelity to each other, but very few are really faithful throughout their lives. There is more honesty in Islam within a polygamous marriage. Perhaps that is why more and more Europeans are looking for salvation not in Christianity but in other religions.

Islamization of Europe is taking place rapidly. This tendency will only increase, as in many European schools there are 50% immigrant children. While Christian churches are quietly fighting with each other, Europe is falling into a demographic abyss. It is time to join efforts in order to survive! Otherwise in a hundred years there will be no one on the continent to talk about Christ. If we don't take urgent measures now, Christianity may disappear along with all European civilization giving way to other religions.

Followers of Jesus, split into many conflicting Churches and currents, must find strength and common ground for the sake of rescuing Europe, to hold a new Ecumenical Council of Christians, returning to authentic sources and uniting on the basis of the main commandments. Only if it becomes the true Church of Love might would Christianity be able to regain its former prestige and bring moral revival to Europeans.
Chapter 5.

###  The new vector of development

A planet of idiots? * Greed has won over reason * Elements of progress *

The strategy of reasonable development

###  A planet of idiots?

In recent decades, there is more and more evidence and possible proofs of the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence and civilizations. Scientists are baffled and unable to explain how many gigantic structures, difficult to build even with today's technology, could possibly have been erected thousands of years ago. The genesis of man on Earth appears to be more likely the result of genetic engineering rather than of natural selection.

In practically all religions of the world Gods are associated the heavens only. Some ancient drawings and descriptions resemble space ships. Striking similarities of ancient legends of different peoples, who lived far away from each other on different continents, might suggest that representatives of extraterrestrial civilization visited various parts of our planet in the past.

According to conventional history, Europeans has covered the way from primitive caves to computers for just 40.000 years, but the history of civilization of aliens from other planets, according to some scientists equals to 500-800 thousand years. In this case they are like gods for people. Perhaps these gods created us It is also possible that the Envoy from Heaven, Jesus Christ, was their representative. Unfortunately, he failed to enlighten the people and create a Kingdom of Love on Earth.

A lot of people believe that two thousand years ago God addressed people through Christ. But how could an extraterrestrial civilization do it nowadays? Apply directly through the BBC or CNN? There is controversial data that something of the kind was done some decades ago. On the internet you can find «The third appeal to mankind» made allegedly on behalf of a coalition of extraterrestrial civilizations.

The third appeal to mankind (fragments)

«.....It would be better to consider Humanity non reasoning, but a potentially reasonable race, because the limitation of thinking is not innate among you. The human brain is endowed by Nature with the ability to reason, no less perfect than organs of thinking of representatives of many intelligent races in the Universe. The ability of your thinking capacity, however, went completely astray from the very beginning. »

«Using your mathematical language, we can say that your logic is based jn a discrete rather than continuous system the basis of which is the primitive function of two possible values: Yes and no. Hence the inevitable conclusion is that if your method of perception of existence can be called thinking, this system of thinking is the most primitive of all possible».

«Discretization of logic forces you to break up the perceived monolithic information on certain facts, phenomena, concepts and categories, drawing artificial boundaries between them. Discretization of logic and principles of arithmetic lead you to assume that there are a finite number of attributes for any given object and to name each one. Thus, this appears a very dubious way to distinguish between one and the other - a technique called abstracting by you. Movement on the steps of abstraction to more general criteria is considered by you to be the only right way to learn the truth, but this movement is the way leading to the opposite direction : from truth to darkness. Not coincidentally, all your abstract designs, referred to as "philosophical systems", are mutually contradictory, although they are based on the same logic ».

«Your public and personal morality is guided by rules which polarize concepts of «goodness» - «evil», «life», «death», «recognition»- «non - recognition», «love», «hatred» and others in the same way. Even your own observation that the meaning of these diametrically opposed concepts is different in different nations doesn't help you. Even more complicating is that even one nation may have a different interpretation of it at different times. »

«Currently the most primitive of all – Machine civilization dominates on Earth. It has taken over all Humanity, keeps it under control and will not give a new civilization a chance to appear , unless it destroys itself or only if mankind takes control over the development of the world machine civilization in its hands and gradually transforms it into another type of civilization, much more needed by the intelligent race. »

«... Local civilizations, centered in the town of Apuradhapur at the moment of the first appeal and the town of Tkaatsetkoatl at the time of our second appeal, correspond much more to the needs of Mankind. »

The mentioned towns really existed in America and Asia some thousand years ago, but now there is little information about those ancient civilizations. Though it was quite possible that those who lived there were much happier than now.

Some scientists claim that representatives of extraterrestrial civilizations are quite near us, for example, on the Moon, and give convincing evidence of this. What were the real reasons behind the American's decision to stop their Moon Program so unexpectedly and abruptly? They had space ships practically ready to fly to the Moon but no-one has been there for nearly 30 years.

They are much stronger

«There are extraterrestrial forces, which are much stronger than we had anticipated. I have no right to talk about it anymore. »

Wernher von Braun , the director of the Centre of space flights NASA,

Manager of the Moon Program of the USA

Extraterrestrial civilizations are not just stronger, but much more intelligent that we are. But we are aggressive to idiocy, as to believe it possible to fight even against extraterrestrial gods! Secret data has been made public that there were nuclear weapons on the space ship Apollo 13 flying to the moon. Americans were, allegedly, ready to use it against aliens they had met there previously. However, as they approached the moon, the oxygen tank exploded. Due to the significant destruction of the instrumentation and propulsion compartment the landing of the expedition had to be cancelled. Astronauts somehow managed to come back to Earth. It is quite possible that gods or aliens first damaged the American ship very carefully to prevent the delivery of nuclear weapons to the moon, and then helped the crew avoid death. It is known that near Apollo 13 there were mysterious UFOs.

According to recently declassified data, only the intervention of extraterrestrial intelligence prevented the application of American nuclear weapons against North Vietnam in March 1967. In three missile bases all starting equipment was out of order. It happened after unidentified flying objects in the form of huge red cigars appeared above them. According to the evidence of former U.S. military, UFOs hovered above the base for half an hour and then disappeared. It seems that extraterrestrial intelligence actively counteracts our idiocy in the most dangerous cases.

During his term in office U.S. President Harry Truman gave the order to shoot UFOs down. The Soviet military pilots also tried to attack flying saucers. The attitude of aliens to our warlike attacks was quite indulgent, as if they were children's pranks and never responded by returning fire. Of course, it is difficult for extraterrestrial gods to understand our logic. On the one hand, people are eager to make war with them on Earth and on the moon, and on the other they dream of receiving technological secrets from them. For aliens it is probably very puzzling that these two contradictory attitudes are compatible in the minds of intelligent beings. It is possible that they consider our Earth to be a planet of idiots. Some scientists declare it openly:

Is Earth the planet of idiots?

« Possibly aliens see us as idiots, a primitive society. Maybe they have fenced us in with a peculiar screen all over the galaxy and have sent warnings to all of the hundreds of billions of stars that the civilization near the Dwarf Star, as we call our Sun, is dangerous. It is better not to approach it, because Earthlings will use any knowledge that you give them to create superpowers for themselves or superpoisons against your own populations. We fail the test of intellectual space maturity».

Sergey Smirnov, researcher at Pulkovo Observatory, St. Petersburg.

It is absolutely obvious that extraterrestrials will not give us their knowledge and technologies until we show that we are well-intentioned and intelligent. Even a kitchen knife is dangerous in the hands of an evil man - he can kill with it. We probably look like dangerous fools in their eyes. After all, humanity uses achievements of science primarily a for military purpose, that is, improving the technology of killing instead of building the Kingdom of Love, as the messenger Christ preached. We are too aggressive and too militarized. Even space was domesticated mainly for military purposes.

Eloquent figures

According to the research of academician Vladimir Strahov in the 20th century investment in science was divided as follows:

• _50 % development of weapons;_

• _30 % development of technical equipment;_

• _10 % basic science, natural science, math;_

• _5 % social science;_

• _5 % education and medicine._

Probably very few taxpayers would agree to spend 10 times more on the development of weapons than on health and education research. But who asks them? Huge expenditures on weapons are largely meaningless and do not solve all the security problems. The Soviet Union produced more tanks than all other countries in the world. However, neither rockets nor armored Armada saved the country from collapse, from terrible economic and social losses. The United States will hardly be saved by mountains of weapons. The experience of the war in Afghanistan shows that even the most modern and highly equipped army cannot break the resistance of an untrained and ill-equipped but proud nation.

Our world is uncontrollably sliding towards the brink of a global catastrophe. Perhaps the aliens from the moon can see it better than the senators in Washington or parliamentarians in

Moscow and Brussels. Perhaps representatives of extraterrestrial civilizations are right calling humanity not reasonable, only a potentially reasonable race.

There is very convincing evidence of this. At the end of the last century many scientists were talking about the pollution of the atmosphere leading to "the greenhouse effect", global warming, melting of the polar ice caps and a dangerous rise of the sea level as a consequence. This global threat forced the acceptance of the «UN Framework Convention on Climate Change» in 1992. Five years later they developed and ratified the Kyoto Protocol, which was the first global agreement on the protection of the environment. Formally it was supported by more than 180 countries around the world. However, implementation of the agreement faced considerable difficulties. Only EU countries took on obligations to reduce emissions by 8 %. The major contributors to pollution – the USA, China, India, and well as developing countries refused to accept limits to constrain emissions. At the end of 2011 Canada announced its secession from the Kyoto Protocol to avoid paying huge fines. Japan and Russia refused to sign the new version of the agreement.

Meanwhile, there are already irreversible changes in the ecology of the planet. The suicidal direction of development of our civilization and inability to come to an arrangement even in the face of global threats may force extraterrestrial intelligence to intervene. Perhaps our land is dearer to them than it is to us.

###  Greed has won over Reason

How and in what way could extraterrestrial .intelligence pass on their knowledge to humanity? More important – to whom? International officials of the UN? With fanfare in secret cases? Or into the mind of scientists in the form of brilliant insight and discoveries?

Between the invention of the steam engine and the combustion engine there were 162 years (1698-1860) passed. Now scientific and technical progress is happening much more rapidly. A great number of mind-blowing technical innovations have appeared which weren't even dreamed about. Why, despite such rapid development of technology, is mankind still using a very harmful combustion engine? After all, it was invented more than 150 years ago! It is strange and surprising that we have not invented anything really innovative. Why do we pollute our planet and even don't try to use clean energy, which was opened by Nikola Tesla more than a century ago?

At the end of the ХIХ century, when our civilization was only entering the era of smoking engines, Universal Mind tried to prevent the catastrophic pollution of the Earth and started to send humanity knowledge about clean energy. However, it was devastating for the greedy oil barons. According to some researchers, big business managed to block the brilliant scientific ideas and to lead our civilization on a suicidal path.

Humanity created nuclear energy which was neither clean nor safe. Meanwhile the more eco-friendly and efficient types of energy and methods of production were left by the wayside, it were just forgotten. More precisely, the memory of it was deliberately erased. It is not difficult to guess in whose interest this was done....

The price of oil is now the main indicator of the "health" of the economy, and many aspects of life and our enjoyment of it. At the same time, oil and petroleum products are responsible for the lion's share of environmental pollution especially in big cities. According to research done by American scientists, published in the journal "Environmental Research Letters", every year more than two and a half million deaths in the world are directly linked to air pollution and destruction of the ozone layer of the planet. This number greatly exceeds the loss of life of current years due to armed conflict; in 2012, for example, wars took only 70 000 lives.

What source of fuel do UFOs use?

Nowadays, very few people doubt the existence of UFOs. Unidentified flying objects are periodically observed in many places of our planet. They are sometimes huge in size and move with incredible speed, not only in the air but also underwater. All this requires a huge amount of energy.

What fuel do they use to fly a UFO? Certainly not aviation kerosene such as we pour into the tanks of our jets. Some scientists suggest that they use nuclear energy. Alas, our thinking is very limited, and we can only imagine what is known in our science. But many things are not known!

UFOs most likely use the cleanest and most efficient energy - exactly the same one offered to us at the end of the 19th century by the universal powers.

Where do they find this clean energy? From the air, or more precisely from ether. At one time in physics there was such a concept, but then it was removed, rejected as pseudoscientific, and not by chance, it seems that whenever there was a movement towards a promising direction for humanity, it was blocked.

This is not a fantasy and capturing energy from the ether might have been demonstrated to the world many years ago. The brilliant inventor Nikola Tesla (1856-1943) was exactly that scholar-practitioner, who could lead the research for mankind in the development of clean energy. This Slav (Serb by origin) made fantastic inventions and discoveries that amazed his contemporaries. He stated: "I am not the author of these ideas!" and asserted that he was only a guide and intermediary. Nikola Tesla didn't need mathematical calculations, drawings or numerous experiments,, his brain got everything in a finished state from somewhere through the flash of illumination. This method of discovery, which Tesla experienced, has no analogues in the history of science. This brilliant inventor did not even conceal that he got everything from space, but no one took him seriously.

At the beginning of the twentieth century Nikola Tesla demonstrated his Grand Experiment to the world. By using this power in his tower in Wardenclyffe on Long Island near New York City he lit the night sky over the Atlantic so that they could easily read the newspaper headlines.

The night was like day

«Layers of the atmosphere ignited at different altitudes and over a large territory so that night instantly became day. All the air was filled with the glow ».

Newspaper «New-York Sun»

The powerful and wealthy magnates who made huge profits selling their electricity hardly appreciated Nikola Tesla's Grand Experiment in New York. Probably not by chance, a few years before this there was a fire in his laboratory on Fifth Avenue. The building burned to the ground and destroyed the inventor's latest achievements.

The 50 meter high Wardenclyffe Tower was built with the financial backing of the famous banker John Morgan. Sly Tesla hid from him was that the tower was intended not only for radio waves, but also for wireless transmission of electricity. As soon as Morgan realized this, he immediately refused further financing because this invention allowed everyone to get electricity for free which would bring the market to a halt. John Morgan, a co-owner of the Niagara Hydro Electro Station, the first in the world, as well as large copper plants , could not permit that. The Wardenclyffe Tower was deserted for a few years, and in 1917 it was blown up under very strange circumstances. It was alleged it could have been used by German spies. The Grand Experiment with the tower became a turning point in the life of Nikola Tesla. He began to work in a more solitary mode, patenting mainly discoveries in the field of mechanics and occasionally giving interviews to newspapers.

According to some researchers, in 1931, Tesla again surprised everyone with a new phenomenon. He took out a petrol engine from an ordinary car and installed an electric engine instead. Then Tesla attached a small box and pulled out two rods from it. There are claims that he drove the car at speeds of up to 150 kmh. There were no batteries or rechargeable batteries back then. When he was asked where the energy came from, he calmly replied: "From the air around us". Probably, the brilliant inventor sincerely expected a triumph, but he received quite the opposite. Nobody believed him and there were rumors that he had a connection with the devil. Outraged, Tesla took off the mysterious box from the car and no-one has seen it since. The mystery of the source of the energy still remains unsolved. .

Perhaps it is only a legend but it fits the inventor's postulate that energy of the universe can be extracted from the environment. Every inch of space, as Nikola Tesla believed, is full of boundless, infinite energy which only needs to be extracted.

The ocean of pure energy

«Our world is immersed in a vast ocean of energy; we are flying in the infinite space at incredible speed. Everything revolves, around, moves - everything is energy. We have a daunting task - to find ways to extract this energy. Then, pulling it out of this inexhaustible source, humanity will move forward with giant steps».

Nikola Tesla, 1891.

The brilliant inventor believed that the Earth is the center of a giant generator, which rotates, creating a potential difference of billions of volts. Humanity, in fact, lives in a spherical condenser of giant capacity, which is continually charged and discharged. In such a condenser the ionosphere is the phase; the atmosphere the dielectric and the Earth the zero point. Thus, there is a global electrical process on our planet.

Tesla's ideas are easily confirmed by looking around us. An average storm is nothing but a discharge of a giant condenser of huge capacity». Scientists know that the energy of an ordinary thunderstorm is equal to the explosion of a small nuclear bomb, about 15-16 Kt of TNT. There are 44000 thunderstorms in the world every day or 1800 thunderstorms an hour; it means there is a thunderstorm every two seconds. On average, every second 7-8 Kt of TNT goes into the ground. The energy released during a thunderstorm exceeds the total global consumption of electricity two fold. (!!!) In 2005 it was only 3.8 Kt a second.

There is more than enough pure energy around us. Even though people do not know how to extract it they seem very little preoccupied with searching for smart technical solutions. Or is it that, maybe, someone is intentionally obstructing this? Why do we still continue to use a harmful combustion engine which is environmentally unfriendly for more than 150 years later (!!!), while the development of electric vehicles requires only batteries? How can we explain this unnatural narrow-mindedness? Probably only by the fact that greed supersedes reason and the huge profit from the sale of oil is more important than ecology and health...

Viewed from this perspective, doesn't our Earth look like a planet of idiots? After all, the real world powers didn't allow Nikola Tesla the chance to give humanity clean energy. Some contemporaries of Tesla, who worked with him, claimed that the archived research he did in physics was confiscated by the secret services immediately after his death. Many of his patents were acquired and classified by the U.S. government and important papers mysteriously disappeared. Many of the results of his fantastic studies have gone without leaving a trace. At the same time, more than 150.000 documents stored in the Nikola Tesla Museum in Belgrade are still waiting to be rediscovered by researchers.

In the last years of his life Nikola Tesla claimed that «free will can be constructive only in union with kindness». This can be interpreted to mean that communication with the Universal Mind is closed due to evil forces which, unfortunately, still prevail on the planet.

###  Criteria of progress

Nowadays the major priority of governments in all developed countries is the economy. They are more concerned about a drop in stock indices and oil prices than a drop in the birth rate. Financial problems seem to be much more important than the problems of the family, loneliness and spiritual development.

Let's imagine, for a moment, that tomorrow all the economic and financial problems have been solved and rapid increase in production and insane consumption start again. Where will this ultimately lead our civilization? To prosperity or inevitable death? The answer is quite obvious because everything has been calculated by scientists. Thus, it seems that humanity is consciously moving towards self-destruction. But for the sake of what? Is it really just for the sake of bank and corporate profits?

What is going to happen to us?

Sometimes, trying to look at everything from the outside, we ask ourselves a question: «What is going to happen to us? » According to statistics, at present, a person produces so much more than one can consume, and earth's multi-billion population could live with it satisfyingly and comfortably. What prevents us from it? That makes us work more and more, produce more and more year by year, consume more and more, not even thinking about the fact that the Earth's resources are not infinite. One of the reasons is productivity is growing, production of products is growing and PROFIT IS GROWING as well. In pursuit of profit, we are ready to destroy the planet. »

Georges Volkov, gidepark.ru

Fantastic profits

Sberbank's net profit, calculated according to international standards, increased fourfold from 20.8 billion rubles in the second quarter of 2010 to 89.3 billion in the second quarter of 2011. Its net profit from January to October 2011 under Russian Accounting Standards (RAS) increased by 2.2 against the similar period of the previous year and totaled more than 276 billion rubles. Profit in the banking system in Russia in 2011 reached a record high amount of 900 billion rubles. In the previous year, the profit of all banks in the Russian Federation came to 570 billion.

Total profits of American banks, deposits of which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., FDIC), amounted to more than 35 billion dollars in the third quarter of 2011, which is 48% more than in 2010 and is the highest of the last five years.

From 2009 to 2010 the total profit of European banks increased by 110 billion euros. In 2010 the total profit of the 15 leading European banks amounted to 85 billion euros. In 2009 these indicators were half as much.

Very few citizens of Europe and America can compete with banks and boast that even during the economic crisis their income annually grows by one and a half times or even doubles. It is obvious that profits of financiers do not appear out of thin air, and somehow it is taken out of our pockets. First, people are imposed by loans and then their property is taken for debts. Many banks begin to introduce unreasonable customer service fees, resembling feudal systems. Russian Sberbank started charging 3% for giving out cash. So it is not surprising that banks quickly made large sums of money without any additional effort. It is noteworthy that such insidious practices are accompanied by hypocritical advertising, in which banks speak about their love for their customers. Morality is considered an unnecessary ballast and not taken into account in economics. For the sake of huge profits everything is possible. As it turns out, the global economic crisis was largely caused by the lack of decency and honor of many representatives of businesses.

CONSCIENCE AND ECONOMICS

The opinion of the Pope

According to Pope Benedict XVI, financial and economic shocks are the results of a moral crisis. «Europe is in an economic and financial crisis which, ultimately, means an ethical crisis has hit Europe, » he said in his speech on the eve of 2012.

The opinion of an economist

The famous Nobel Prize winner in Economics Joseph Eugene Stieglitz in his book «A Steep dive. America and the new economic order after the global crisis, » writes not only about the economy, but also about ethical values. According to him, the origin of the crisis lies in the deformation of these values. «Every episode of the current crisis is characterized by a lack of remorse, » he said.

The opinion of an oligarch

Not only the head of the Catholic Church spoke about Christ and the importance of changing the mentality, but even the Russian oligarch who didn't have the best reputation. Here is what Boris Berezovsky said in his interview to the Ukrainian edition of «Glavred»:

«The financial and economic crisis, which is now much talked about, is only an echo of the huge philosophical and mental crisis. Our mentality can no longer ensure the development of society. We now find ourselves in a deadlock. And the only way out of this deadlock, from my point of view, is in rejection of telling lies. We must stop telling lies completely.

The first country, which would put forth financial transparency, will become the world leader within one generation. Because it is a purification. This is a real competition, a real creativity. When did Moses appear? When did Christ come to the scene? Those were times of mental deadlock and mankind could not continue to develop within the framework of its old mentality.

And what is happening now to WikiLeaks is like the Second Advent, because the society we live in is rotten. It is not very comfortable even for the rich and wealthy, and for other billions it is horrible. »

Once in the Russian Empire there was a popular saying «Agreement is worth more than money». There was also such a concept as that of «a merchant's word of honor», which was worth its weight in gold. Then the concept of honor was decisive not only among the aristocracy, but also among respected merchants. Now in our time, violation of agreements doesn't surprise, and even killing of business partners. Business piracy has reached huge proportions – raiding of businesses is possible through self-proclaimed bankruptcy, often employing semi-criminal methods. In a mad chase for money great Europeans of the 21st century are often ready to fall below the moral level of the feudal middle ages.

Lack of holistic thinking

«From conversations with entrepreneurs and economists I can conclude that one of the reasons for the crisis is excessive greed. And the second - the lack of a holistic picture of what is happening. People think only of short-term results and don't care about long-term consequences».

«At the Copenhagen summit, dedicated to climate changes, some participating countries showed that their own interests are more important than the interests of the whole world. It testifies to the absence of a holistic picture. »

Dalai Lama, an interview with RIA Novosti

Our economic development is vanity of vanities. We want love and happiness, but actually we are moving in the opposite direction. How much has quality of life become better for Europeans in the last hundred years? Let's compare.

HOUSES. Though our technical and financial possibilities have greatly increased, our houses have become less beautiful, comfortable or harmonious. We admire a lot of buildings built a hundred years ago. But very few people like modern architectural ugliness. The concept of beauty has almost gone.

FOOD. The choice of food for Europeans is more varied, but now contains huge amounts of chemical additives, many of which are bad for our health. The same thing is true of overeating, which used to be less common than now. Our ancestors didn't have as much variety in their diets but had more natural and tasty food a hundred years ago than we do now.

CONDITIONS OF LIFE. Now we have much more comfort, but it doesn't always work in our favor. We move and communicate less. Growth of industry and mad consumption lead to horrible environmental pollution which greatly affects an increase in morbidity and mortality. The furious pace of life makes millions of people live in conditions of permanent stress, which was not as prevalent in the past.

HEALTH. On the one hand we have accomplished fantastic advances in medicine, but on the other we have multiplication of many diseases, including mortally dangerous ones, such as cancer. Almost half of the residents of large cities have mental issues. The number of sick children has significantly increased. There are very few perfectly healthy people among adults.

RELATIONSHIPS. Earlier big and supportive families dominated in Europe. There was less comfort, but much more warmth and kindness towards each other. The level of consumption was lower, but the level of love was higher. Now there is estrangement not only between neighbors and colleagues, but even between close relatives.

When the old woman, who was celebrating her one hundredth anniversary, was asked to compare the current era with the times of her youth, she answered with a simple, but capacious phrase: «Then people were poorer, but kinder. Our life was much more modest, but there was much more fun than now! » Of course, it is impossible to go back to the old days. The world is completely different. It is less romantic and more rational. Our civilization is used to measuring everything. . It is believed that they better reflect the reality, though, in fact, often they only lead us away from the truth.

Even if the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita has increased significantly, it does not mean that people's lives have become proportionally better. If a man in Paris earns three times more than his counterpart in province, it does not mean that the provincial lives worse. It is quite possible that he lives much better. Unlike the Parisian he does not get stuck in traffic jams, doesn't breathe in exhaust gases, so his nerves and lungs are in better condition. He spends less money on medicines and doctors. Accommodation and food in the country is much cheaper, because in the capital not only salaries are higher, but also prices. Therefore the difference in the level of consumption is not as great. A Parisian gets a lot more money, but he spends much more. So there is no triple superiority in real life.

The main criteria of development for the Europeans should not be GDP growth, but the growth of the birth rate. Not the level of consumption, but the level of happiness and quality of life. Surveys show that the level of happiness is not always determined by the level of consumption. In fact three children in a family bring more happiness than three cars, even if they are the most expensive and luxurious.

The opinion of people

On the eve of 2012 the world famous company-WIN-Gallup International conducted a sociological research of the level of happiness. More than 52 thousand people were interviewed in 58 countries. The happiest were the residents of the Fiji Islands - 89% of the inhabitants of this Republic feel happy, and only 4% -miserable. Among the most fortunate countries there are Nigeria (84%), the Netherlands (77%), Switzerland (76%), Colombia (71%), Finland (70%), Germany (68%), Iceland (66%), Denmark (64%), and Brazil (63%).

It would appear that the level of happiness does not depend on the country's economic prosperity. In the following group of countries where citizens earn low to medium incomes, South Korea, Iceland, Saudi Arabia, Argentina, Malaysia, Peru, Azerbaijan and even Tunisia, they were quite happy. At the same time, the list of countries with predominantly unhappy inhabitants was not the poorest countries: the Czech Republic, Turkey, Bulgaria, Macedonia, South Africa, China, India, Ukraine and Russia.

It is interesting that the residents of an impoverished country such as Afghanistan turned out to be a little happier than Americans - representatives of the richest country of the world. The happiness index in the USA amounted to 33%, while in Afghanistan it reached 35%.

We are not able to fully appreciate the quality of our lives, for, in the words of «the Third Epistle», we divide «integrally perceived information based on certain facts, phenomena, concepts and categories, making artificial borders between them ». Dividing our existence into separate fragments, we miss the most important components only because they do not fit into our framework and can't be measured as easily as GDP or consumption.

For example, for every adult person there is a need for food but also love and sex. They are important components of human happiness. But how can these elements be calculated or measured? Our statistics can calculate consumption of meat or vegetables per capita giving the exact quantity of kilograms. But love and sex, which are no less important for a full life have been virtually ignored and little studied. As if they do not matter at all.

In the same way, fragmented and chaotic, the catastrophic decline in birth rate in Europe is studied and solved, although it is now the most serious problem of national security of virtually every European country, except, perhaps, Turkey and Albania. Politicians are trying to stimulate the birth rate with financial incentives, but it does not change the situation with original European nations. They do, however, significantly help and attract large families of foreign workers. At the same time, medical institutions, created by feminist organizations, work in the opposite direction, promoting family planning. It means that there is complete chaos in the most crucial sphere of national security and unity!

There is no European country where you can find an organization studying this problem in all aspects, including not only social, but also sex. It is clear that effective solutions need a comprehensive approach and evaluation of the situation in its entirety rather than its parts. We will try to do this in the second part of the book.

It is absolutely obvious that the measurement of only economic indicators of growth leads our civilization not to progress, but to degradation and destruction. To avoid the self-destruction of mankind we must change the vector of development. The world should be governed by reason, not money! The epoch of reasonable and harmonious development must replace the era of consumer idiocy. That is the only way to transform planet of idiots into a planet of intellect.

###  The strategy of reasonable development

The failure of the Kyoto Protocol and revealing experience of international responses to the global environmental threat gives little hope that humanity will be able to change the vector of development voluntarily and stop the insane economic race, race which is pushing our civilization towards death. Most likely, an economic or ecological catastrophe will force us to do so. Unfortunately, inertia is so great that not the power of the mind, but only a cataclysm of monstrous scale can free mankind from the epidemic of consumer idiocy. Paradoxically, the forthcoming global collapse could have very positive results, and even do good to humanity. But only if it makes us change the vector of development to a more reasonable and less dangerous one for the planet.

A look into the future

«I see two scenarios:

1. The global crisis will intensify; there would be a collapse - depreciation of paper money and everything that this implies. As a result there will be a 3rd world war with terrible consequences. Those who survive will need to find a new form of existence. In spite of our enormous internal resistance we will have to attain to the delicate balance between us on the principles of altruism and security.

2. We will be smarter and, in anticipation of the terrible consequences of our wrong actions, we will want to change ourselves without a kick. In this case, the external war will turn into an inner war with our selfishness. That is much more desirable and acceptable. Of course the financial and ecological crises will affect us, but they will not have such catastrophic consequences, as in the first alternative.

We must realize that we are all in the same boat - Earth, and we depend on each other. You cannot drill a hole under you, thinking that this is not harmful for others, as well as for yourself. If we realize this – we will be able to come to an agreement and choose the right path».

Sergey Troitsky, gidepark.ru

«Personal ambitions of politicians, demonstration and use of force with political and economic objectives, the arms race, the universal pursuit of material prosperity- all these things belong to the outgoing epoch. The era of domination over others. The era of the childhood of humanity.

The new era will be completely different. More mature. More reasonable. More humane. And it is already emerging, this new era. There are already hints of a new beginning \- the Internet, rapid development of science and technology, incredible technical upgrade of medicine, production globalization, widespread critique of the existing political systems - Western and Eastern, capitalist and socialist».

Yulia Kalinina, journalist of «MK»

To get on the path of reasonable development of mankind we must have reasonable leaders. Unfortunately, this most important position of responsibilities on our planet leaves much to be desired. In every country there are a lot of intelligent and decent people – wise and honest, but in power are not the best of them. As a rule, they are ambitious, not very wise and honest at times. Sometimes they are just sick, like Leonid Brezhnev and Boris Yeltsin, or very narrow-minded, like some American presidents. The existing system of choosing of our rulers, to put it mildly, is far from perfect.

It is well-known that money plays the crucial role at democratic elections , not intellect or a soul of the candidate. So not personal qualities and his correspondence to the high position are important for the victory , but the possibilities of financing the election company. In such a situation, an honest and sensitive man often loses to an insolvent and dishonest person who is easily corrupted, who doesn't shun dirty alliances. Sometimes even initially honest candidates have to become dishonest in order to win elections.

Political advertising doesn't fundamentally differ from commercial. Sometimes it is even more sophisticated and cynical. In handbooks for political analysts and political consultants there are instructions on how to write speeches. They advise how many times the words «Motherland» or «Family» must be mentioned to appeal to more voters. It looks like instructions for training animals.

Very often the attention of the voters is deliberately distracted by inconsequential details. An example of this is the great publicity given to sexual scandals. More than likely a stupid impotent would have a better chance of winning an election than a wise and sexually active candidate. In the case of a strong rivalry between the two candidates, society usually finds itself imposed on to choose the first and not the latter.

Before elections of the president in France in 2012 it was the most talented and the most suitable candidate during the crisis period who, suddenly, turned out to be out of the game due to a sexual scandal. In its time in the U.S. they tried to use an inappropriate oral sex as the main instrument for ouster of the current President. At the same time, even downright stupidity of a ruler never becomes a reason for his impeachment. It turns out that sexual life of the president is much more important than his correct political and economic decisions. Nobody deprives the rulers of power for stupid mistakes that cost the country billions of dollars or even thousands of lives. But for the «wrong» sex they may be deprived of power and not allowed to get it.

In modern society, many educated people believe that the real power belongs not to governments, but to a secret community which rules the world.

Are 9 people ruling the world?

The New York Times published a front-page article stating that the heads of 9 world banks: Goldman Sachs, UBS, Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, and similar ones gather in a restaurant on Wall Street every month. Thus, on a regular basis, these nine people make decisions regarding six billion people: what will be the unemployment rate bi in the world, how many people will die of famine, which governments will be overthrown, how many ministers will be bought and so on. They are respectable criminals, but they are far more influential than any world political leader. They have the real power - the power of money».

Julietto Chiesa, well-known journalist, antiglobalist and ex-Deputy of the European Parliament, excerpt from the interview given to the Agency «Rosbalt»

It is unlikely that the conspiracy theory can explain all the problems of the modern world. Human stupidity is much more dangerous than any secret community. If the leaders of the nine biggest banks of the world coordinate their positions, it is quite reasonable, and perhaps even useful. It is unlikely that they, like some kind of monsters, would determine the quota for "how many people will die of famine." Bank kings gather in New York for other purposes, such as finding solutions to economic and financial problems which presently engulf the world. However, they are not able to solve the biggest problem of our planet - the excessive power of money.

Every year representatives of the world political and business elite come to the Swiss resort town of Davos. This forum is probably the most prestigious in the world. However, it is far from being necessary and effective in the current situation. It would be much more useful to organize a world forum of scientists and experts, who would initiate the strategy of reasonable development of mankind and form the World Council of the wisest men. Such a forum could be the first step for the transition of mankind from the power of money to the power of Intellect.

Today many of the most important directions taken by humanity move it away from reason. As an example, consider the transport problems of megacities; millions of people around the world face this problem daily. It is a well-known fact that 70 to 90 percent of air pollution in the cities comes from the exhaust gases of cars. The main focus is still on the improvement of engines and gradual transition to electric cars. However, much more effective and radical solutions are not even considered, although some of them are obvious, and possibly many of them have already been imagined. But stereotyped thinking prevents us from translating these innovative ideas into reality

The city autos

In large cities most transport consists of cars, each of which has from four to five seats, but, more often than not, they transport only one or at best two people. As well, the baggage compartments are almost always empty.Therefore, especially in cities, cars are used extremely inefficiently, and essentially they don't carry people, but mostly air. When driving and parking they occupy absolutely excessive and very scarce space. They also burn a huge amount of unnecessary fuel and emit additional millions of tons of exit gases, which, in turn, contribute to the premature death of many of the city citizens.

Why don't we create two-seater cars especially for the use of urban dwellers? The main idea is that they must be twice more narrow than usual ones. The seats for the driver and the passenger should be one behind the other like 1+1, but not 2+3 like now. It would reduce the width of the road strip by half, nearly doubling the capacity of the roads for such cars. It would dramatically reduce air pollution and increase the number of places in parking lots. Buses, trucks and taxis would be allowed to move using two of the narrow strips. The use of SUVs, minivans and limousines in the big cities should be minimized and be prohibitively expensive.

Of course, for those who are used to riding around in huge jeeps, such a decision seems totally unacceptable.

It is clear that it will not be easy to make the transition to compact city cars, but the effort is worth it. Let's discuss all the advantages and disadvantages. On the one hand: a more rational use of transport, a sharp increase of traffic capacity in the city highways, reduction of air pollution and, consequently, reduction of morbidity and even mortality, reduction of fuel consumption, considerable savings of metal and other materials in the manufacturing of smaller cars as well as huge savings on road construction. On the other hand? The wasted space of a half-empty car, luxury and «vanity»! So far, in our not too rational world «showing-off» wins! Although from the point of view of common sense, it is much better to drive in a compact car, than to get stuck in traffic jams for hours sitting alone in a huge jeep.

However, for automakers it is more profitable to produce big cars. So the cars don't become smaller with time, but bigger. This is very evident when one compares the current models of «Toyota» or «Peugeot» with similar models of the same class of thirty or even twenty years ago. There is less space in the city streets but the cars are becoming bigger. Even if there is some interest in small-sized cars in the big cities it doesn't change anything essentially since the width of these cars doesn't differ much from the standard ones.

Nobody designs fundamentally new two-seat town cars yet. You can't see them in the concept of the judgments on any motor show. All new items are only in the framework of old stereotypes. Like the newest Russian yo-mobile by billionaire Prokhorov. Although especially for the capital of Russia, which is experiencing the transport collapse, introduction of special city cars could be the most rational and effective decision. Indeed, in Moscow roads take up only 10 percent of the city surface area, whereas in the large cities of Europe and America they take up from 20 to 35 percent. It may, in the end, make Russia become a pioneer in promoting a fundamentally new city car that would be a good example for the rest of the world.

Another non-standard, but quite reasonable solution to the problem is optimization of movement. In the past, people did not have such transport possibilities as they do now, and therefore, they lived close to their place of work. Today, many campuses are located near universities. However, few can boast of such conveniences in modern metropolitan areas. In Moscow and other large cities, millions of citizens spend 2-3 hours commuting daily to work and back home. It causes stress. People come to work already tired, and return home completely exhausted. Who forces them to go through this? Technical progress and furious development of transport! But why do we need such progress, if people become its slaves, if their quality of life and even their health are in the last priority?

If we want to meet the true needs of people, we must legislate a limit on the time spent commuting to work in big cities. Let's say a maximum of half an hour each way. It will certainly have an impact on productivity. Therefore, institutions, enterprises and firms should not hire workers living too far as to go over this limit. People should either move closer to the place of work or look for a job closer to home. A special city service established for optimization of transport movement of the population should help solve this problem. In this age of computers it is not difficult to select the appropriate options. Such a «great migration», of course, will require a lot of effort and will have some costs, but ultimately it will not only reduce traffic problems, but also greatly improve the quality of life of citizens.

Many scientists say that we are currently experiencing not only a global economic crisis, but also a crisis of management models, ideologies and spirituality. There is no future for a modern society based on reckless consumption. We need a radical change in our values and priorities.

However, in any case in the coming years, we will not be able to avoid a significant decline in the living standards in almost all countries. This, in turn, can lead to a sharp rise in social tension and political upheaval. New ideas are able to minimize the threat of social explosions and will bring hope for a better future to peoples. People need to open new perspectives, give new ideals based on reason, love, and harmony with the surrounding world.

The successful solution of the current demographic problems for Europe also requires innovative approaches and rejection of traditional stereotypes. Unfortunately, few political leaders understand that the future of European civilization depends not so much on decisions made by politicians and businessmen, but on relationships between men and women. This is the central topic of the second part of the book. We will trace the evolution of Europe over the last century from the ideas of free love, socialization of women and sexual communism to the almost complete collapse of the institution of the family. We will try to find ways to save Europe from ethnic degeneration.
Part two

### SEX, FAMILY and DEMOGRAPHY

Chapter 6.

###  The first sexual revolution

Socialization of women * Love and sexual communism * Sexual freedom – to people! * Get rid of shame! * Commune instead of the family * Sexual counterrevolution * The key issue

###  Socialization of women

Everyone knows about sexual revolution of the 60s. The slogan «Make love, not war! » flew then around the entire planet and evoked a warm response among young people. However, few people know that this was not the first sexual revolution, but the second. Pioneers of radical upheaval in the sex area were not Western hippies, but Russian Communists and their allies - anarchists and left-wing Revolutionaries (socialist-revolutionaries).

Russian sexual revolution was an integral part of the great October socialist revolution of 1917, as a result of which Bolsheviks came to the power in Russia led by Vladimir Lenin and Lev Trotskiy. By the way, the problem of relationships of sexes was discussed in their correspondence in 1911.

Correspondence between Lenin and Trotsky

«Undoubtedly, sexual oppression is the main tool of enslavement of a man. While there is oppression, true freedom is out of the question. The family, as the bourgeois institution has completely outlived its usefulness...»

(From a letter of Lev Trotsky)

«...The fact is that not only the family has become outdated. All the taboos related to sexuality should be removed... We can learn something from suffragettes: even the ban on unisexual love should be removed. »

(From a reply by Vladimir Lenin)

Immediately after the October revolution in 1917, many daring ideas were implemented. Russian sex revolutionaries first raised the idea of «free love» to the state level and tried to implement it in practice. And they relied on the theory of communism, which predicted decay of bourgeois monogamous family and transition to satisfaction of sexual needs in the framework of a free relationship. They didn't forget about the «fruit of love». The state was to take the responsibility of raising of all children. It was proclaimed in «the Communist Manifesto» written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in the middle of the 19th century. The tenth item of the program of transition from capitalism to communism was supposed to provide « Public and free education of all children. »

It has existed almost always

«Communists do not need to introduce publicity of women - it has existed almost always...

... COMMUNISTS CAN BE ACCUSED of NOTHING but DESIRE to introduce OFFICIAL «and «HONEST" SOCIALIZATION instead of hypocritically concealed socialization of women « ».

«Manifesto of the Communist Party», by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Authorized English Translation, Edited and annotated by Frederick Engels, London

For the sake of fairness it should be noted that the authorship of the idea of socialization doesn't belong to the founders of communism, but to the famous ancient Greek philosopher Plato. It was he who proposed the introduction of a common ownership of property, wives and children in his projects of an ideal state.

The idea of a «community of women» was tried to be implemented in many cities of Russia shortly after the October Revolution in 1917. This is confirmed by some documents which were miraculously saved.

Decree of Saratov Province Council of People's Commissars

on the abolition of private ownership of women

Legal marriage which took place before now is undoubtedly a product of the social inequality, that must be uprooted in the Soviet Republic. Till now legal marriages served as a major weapon in hands of bourgeoisie in the struggle with proletariat, only thanks to them all the best specimens of the fair sex were the property of bourgeoisie- imperialists and that this property could not but break correct continuation of the human race. Therefore, Saratov County of people's Commissars with approval of the Executive Committee of the Provincial Council of Workers', Soldiers ' and Peasants ' Deputies has decided:

§1. From the 1st of January 1918 the right of permanent ownership of women aged from 17 to 30 is terminated.

Note: The age of women is defined by metric records, passport, but in case of absence of these documents –by neighborhood committees or the village chief and according to their appearance and testimonies.

§2. This Decree does not apply to married women who have five or more children. .

§ 3. Ex-owners (husbands) keep the right to use their wives out of turn. Note: In case ex-husband resists the introduction of the decree into life, he loses the right given to him by this article.

§ 4. All the women who fully correspond this decree will be withdrawn from permanent private ownership and declared the property of all the working people.

§ 5. The right to manage the excluded women is provided to the Council of Workers ' and Peasants ' Deputies to the Provincial, District and village according to their belonging.

§ 7. Male -citizens have the right to use a woman no more often than four times a week and no more than 3 hours complying the terms specified below.

§ 8. Every member of the labor class is obliged to pay 2% from his earning to the Fund of Folk generation.

§ 9. Every man who wants to use the specimen of the public property should provide the identity of his belonging to the labor class from the workers' and the factory Committee or the professional Union.

§ 10. Those men who don't belong to the working class can acquire the right to use alienated women as long as they pay a monthly fee specified in section 8 of the Fund equaled to 1000 rubles.

§ 11. All the women, declared as the property of people by this decree, receive 280 rubles per month from the Fund of national generation assistance.

§ 12. Women who get pregnant will be relieved of their duties both direct and state for 4 months (3 months before and one after giving birth).

§ 13. Born babies are taken to the shelter «Folk Nursery after a month », where they are raised and get education up to the age of 17.

§ 14. If twins are born the parent is given the reward of 200 rubles.

§ 15. Those who were found to be guilty of spreading sexually transmitted diseases will be brought to legal responsibility for prosecuting on the court of revolution time.

Source: Arch. Federal security service of the Orel region, the case No15554-

This infamous decree still causes many disputes. It is not clear how the Saratov decree was suddenly found in Orel KGB archive, which was inherited by the Federal security service - the FSB. Some researchers claim that the author of the document was «Free Association of anarchists» of Saratov. Others argue that this was a fake written by the owner of the local teahouse Mikhail Uvarov. In this way a member of the monarchist organization «Union of Russian people» wanted to compromise anarchists. It was claimed that after the issue of the decree crowds of angry women of Saratov attacked the club of anarchists, who robbed the teahouse and killed its owner in revenge. The story looks quite convincing, but only at first glance.

After the decree had been studied more thoroughly there were a lot of doubts that the document really existed. Why? Firstly, because it was really permeated by the spirit of Marxism. The significant part of it was devoted not to sexual relations, but to a new generation. For example, in paragraph 13 they say about free upbringing and education for children up to 17 years. Secondly, it is clear that the right monarchist could not be a profound connoisseur of Marxism and was hardly able to write such a document. Third, these decrees appeared in many other cities of Russia. It is unlikely that the dead monarchist could promote wide dissemination. There was no internet in those times yet...

An anarchist Khvatov was believed to be the author of a similar decree In Moscow, he was famous for opening "Palace of Love of Communards" in Sokolniki. It is more likely that all stories about mythical authors of the decree were invented in the 30s, when the Bolsheviks began to cover the tracks of sexual revolution and the possible involvement of red ideologues to these documents.

THE ACT OF INVESTIGATION

on socialization of girls and women

in Ekaterinodar, under mandates of the Soviet power

«In Ekaterinodar, Bolsheviks issued the decree in spring of 1918, published in «Izvestia» and exhibited it on poles, according to which girls aged from 16 to 25 were subjects of «socialization», those ones who wished to take advantage of this decree were to contact the revolutionary institutions. Commissar for internal Affairs Jew, Bronstein was the initiator of this «socialization». It was he who gave out «credentials» on the «socialization»

From the collection of materials of the «Red terror during the civil war, » London, 1992, compiled by Yu. Felshtinskiy

Some historians claimed that the first decree about nationalization of women was accepted by the local authorities of the Soviet Power in the cradle of the Russian revolution Kronstadt, where there were a lot of military sailors and a great influence of anarchists. In Kaluga red Latvian shooters proclaimed Kaluga Soviet Republic. And the decree « On the abolition of private ownership over women » was published among the first ones. Similar decrees were published also by communist authorities in small towns Luga and Kolpino, situated near Petrograd, and in more remote from the capital places. These documents sometimes contained some ambiguous and absolutely utopian points.

The decree, published by Bolsheviks in Vladimir, for example, said about severe punishment for rape and guaranteed «every girl who reached the age of 18 full inviolability as a person ». At the same time the decree announced women older than 18 years old enough to be a state property and obliged them to register in the Bureau of Free Love in the Supervision Office of the Commissioner. It gave them the opportunity to choose men aged from 19 to 50 as a husband ¬- cohabitant. And the consent of the man was, allegedly, not required...

Sexual revolution in Russia caused ambiguous responses abroad. U.S. senators were especially outraged concerning Free love. Here is a transcript of a conversation between Senator King and Mr. Saymons, who arrived from the Soviet Russia. This dialogue took place during the hearings on the situation in Russia in the Senate Committee of Averman in March 1919:

Free love and socialization of women

King: I had a chance to see the original Russian texts of some Soviet decrees and their translation into English. They actually destroy marriage and introduce, so called, free love. Do you know anything about it?

Mr. Saymons: Their program can be found in the Communist Manifesto of Marx and Engels. Prior to our departure from Petrograd they, if we can believe the reports of Newspapers, have already established a very definite regulation regarding the so-called socialization of women.

King: So, to tell the truth, the Bolshevik red army and males-Bolsheviks are kidnapping, raping and depraving women as they want.

Mr. Saymons: Yes, of course, they are doing it!

From the official report of the Senate Committee, published in 1919.

Of course, there were a lot of misunderstandings and overkills on the first stage of Sexual revolution in Russia. The anti-Communist forces exaggerated them deliberately to intimidate people. During the civil war «Decree on abolition of private ownership of women» was widely used in anti-Bolshevist propaganda. It is curious that at the time of arrest of Russian Supreme ruler Admiral Kolchak in Siberia in January 1920 the text of such document was found in the pocket of his uniform. Perhaps some ideas of sexual revolution were not alien even to the leader of the white movement. It is known that in his own sexual and family life he didn't follow generally accepted canons.

###  Love and sexual communism

Russian sexual revolution was not only the first in the world, but the most fundamental, as its aim was systemic transformation not only of sexual, but also family relations. It is significant that women were the main initiators of changes. The first sexual revolutionists appeared in the beginning of the twentieth century. In 1911 a German feminist Meysel -Hess published a book in Germany « Sex crisis », where she proved that modern sex morality – is a fiction. She believed that principles of traditional legal marriage contradict the nature of a human being and so kill love.

The book « Sex crisis» made such a big impression on the Russian feminist Alexandra Kollontai, that she, developing ideas of the German sex revolutionist wrote her own brochure «Love and a new morality». To be fair we must say that some thoughts have not lost their relevance even now.

The cult of the future of mankind

«Modern life is distinguished by absence of «art of love»; people are absolutely unable to keep light, bright, inspired relations, they don't know all the value of « erotic friendship ». Love is either a tragedy, tearing the soul, or a vulgar vaudeville. We have to take humanity out of the impasse; we must teach people to have clear and not burdening emotional distress. Only after going through the school of erotic friendship, the human mentality will be able to perceive the «great love» purified from its dark sides....»

«...Without love mankind would feel robbed, deprived, poor. There is no doubt that love will be the cult of the future of mankind. »

Alexandra Kollontai, «Love and a new morality»

This idea of cult of love was completely shared by a red feminist Inessa Armand, who, together with Alexandra Kollontai participated in preparation and conducting sexual revolution of the Bolsheviks. In 1915 Inessa Armand discussed the contents of her brochure «Freedom of love for a woman» with Vladimir Lenin. The leader liked the favorite theory by Armand that marriage hinders free love, but he, nevertheless, was against the popularization of adultery in the party literature. It should be noted that the Russian Frenchwoman apparently took her bold ideas from her own life.

Lenin's lover

Living with her first husband Alexandr ,Armand Inessa gave birth to four children and lived with him for 9 years, but then, suddenly she left him and went to his brother, Vladimir Armand who was 11 years younger than she. She gave birth to her fifth child from him - her son Andrey.

Then she was seized by a great love to the leader of Bolsheviks. She saw Vladimir Lenin for the first time in December 1909 in Paris, where he came with his wife Nadezhda Krupskaya. The leader of Bolsheviks was already 39, the mother of five children Inessa Armand was 35, and however she was still charming. According to the famous writer Alexander Solzhenitsyn, when she became «Lenin's friend », she accepted the rules of the game «of the three» and was able to show friendly feelings even to her loved man's wife. It should be noted that, Nadezhda Krupskaya also had mutual sympathy to the mistress of her husband, though she was aware of their relations.

When the leader was too involved in relations with the Frenchwoman and began to disappear with her for hours or he ran away with her out of the house in the forest, Krupskaya put an ultimatum - she or Inessa. Lenin preferred his wife to his mistress; he explained this by commitment «to revolution» and «everything that it strengthens». Armand begged Lenin in letters to get back to the old formula: «no one will be hurt if we are all three of us together again! »

In 1920 Lenin didn't allow Armand to go to France and sent her to the Caucasus to have rest. There she died of cholera during the epidemic. In January 1924 the leader of revolution also died. Nadezhda Krupskaya, paying tribute to the great love of Lenin and Armand, offered to bury the remains of her husband together with the ashes of Inessa Armand. But Stalin rejected the suggestion. The dead body was mummified and put on public display. His mausoleum is still operating in Moscow.

But, let's come back to the times when the Kremlin Kunstkammera did not exist, and its main exhibit was still alive and headed the revolutionary government of Russia.

By the way, it had a different name – not the Cabinet of Ministers, but the Council of people's Commissars. And there was the world's first woman Minister Alexandra Kollontai. She was promoted to the post of people's Commissar of the State Charity (now the Minister of labor and social development). Another red feminist Inessa Armand headed female department of the Central Committee of Bolshevik party. The chief theoretician of sexual revolution was Alexandra Kollontai. It was she who introduced the notion «sexual communism». Her brochure «New morality and the working class» was published in 1919 in Petrograd; there she developed the theme of relationships between men and women. According to the conviction of sexual revolutionary, proletariat can accept as moral only sexual relations which are based on passion, and the form of love affair doesn't matter. Thus, love was declared as the main criterion of morality and the main basis of the Union of man and woman. If there is love – there is a family. If love dies, the family is over as well. Bolsheviks strove for destruction of the old bourgeois family and creation of new relations between a man and a woman. Therefore, the Decree on divorce of the Council of people's Commissars was adopted among the first ones in December 1917. The procedure of divorce, which demanded perennial troubles in tsarist Russia, in Soviet Russia took sometimes no more than an hour. Many people were willing to take this advantage. In the same way registration of the marriage Union was simplified. According to the decree «On civil marriage, children and on keeping of the books of acts of civil status» which was also adopted in 1917, a man and a woman were not married in the temple, but just put their signatures in the registration book.

Marriage humor

Magazine «New Satyricon» in 1918 wittily mocked the new Soviet orders in the field of marriage. Here is what Fedor Sologub wrote, probably implying sexual revolutionary Alexander Kollontai:

« You know, she has got married.

\- Has she! Did she get married in church?

\- Well, why! Just wrote in their directory record. We are sure that the way you write the fact of registered marriage in the notebook will soon be left as a way of «bourgeois. It will be just enough to wink and then the marriage is contracted...»

Another joke of that time: «it is forbidden to get married more than 17 times a day»...

It is believed that the very first record in the book of acts of civil status registered in the Soviet Russia was a marriage between Alexandra Kollontai and the leader of revolutionary sailors Pavel Dybenko. It was he who, as the Chairman of Centrobalt provided the fire of «Aurora» and participation of warships of the Baltic fleet in the revolution of Bolsheviks. He met Alexandra Kollontai in Kronstadt, where «agitator Sasha» performed in front of seamen with fiery speeches about the world revolution and freedom of love. So, probably, it was not by chance that the first decree on the abolition of private ownership of women appeared in Kronstadt.

Private life of Alexandra Kollontai

It was an amazing couple. She was a well-educated noblewoman, a General's daughter, but he was a sailor from peasants with the manners of a dock worker and with three classes of a Church parish school education. She was already 45, but he was 28. So, theoretically, this handsome hot brunette could be like her son ... in fact when she was 16 a young General asked Alexandra to get married - the personal aide-de-camp to the Emperor. She, however, was indifferent to the brilliant prospects. In her youth, this girl broke a lot of hearts, bringing some of the fans to suicide. Alexandra got married for love to her second cousin Vladimir Kollontai and gave birth to his son.

However, soon the family routine began to bore her. Alexandra had an affair with a friend of the family - a young officer, who rented a room in their apartment. So it was the first time when she found her in a «love triangle». She loved them both, but in her own way. Five years after the wedding she separated from her husband. «We separated not because we didn't love each other, -wrote Alexandra. - I was attracted by the wave of increasing revolutionary events in Russia». Having left her son to her husband, she went abroad. Before meeting the revolutionary sailor she had several passionate love affairs.

Marriage with Pavel Dybenko lasted six years. Alexandra had to face the problem of the «love triangle», but this time she was not as its top ... When her husband found a young mistress, sexual revolutionary was trying to pretend to be indifferent, hiding terrible pangs of jealousy. But finally she lost her temper and initiated a huge scandal to her spouse. The result of it was that he was taken to hospital with a serious gunshot wound. According to the official version he shot himself with a revolver... Although it cannot be excluded that it was she who fired. Fortunately, the wound was not fatal. Having helped her husband to recover, Alexandra Kollontai said goodbye to him forever. During her later life to the old age she was never alone without attention of young lovers...

Kollontai managed to get on well with Stalin and became the world's first woman Ambassador. Until 1945 she stayed in Sweden. She died from a natural death in Moscow in 1952. In her back memories the red feminist, probably, returned to her greatest love many times, to the stormy events of the revolutionary time. In her memoirs she admitted that some of her actions had not corresponded to her own ideas. Probably bourgeois upbringing and General's genes had some influence on her...

###  Sexual freedom to people!

Sexually-social experiment in Soviet Russia attracted attention of representatives of the West. Widely-minded intellectuals and specialists- sexologists came here. Only from 1919 to 1925 there were more than three hundred of them! Especially a lot of visitors came from Germany. They were delighted with what they saw. For example, a German sexologist Halle Fania's recalled: «the USSR in 1925 really appeared to me as something fantastic. That's where there was a lot of room to work! All the world, and particularly Germany, can envy the events happening here. Applied sexology and psychology advanced here so significantly that there will be enough material to study for a few years. » It is notable that the USSR was the first country in the world that officially recognized the theory of psychoanalysis Sigmund Freud.

Wise governors

«In the Soviet Russia the governors are so wise that they gave people a reasonable extent of sexual freedom »

Sigmund Freud., «The man Moses and monotheistic religion»

Perhaps the most profound study of sexual revolution in Soviet Russia was made by the famous German psychologist Wilhelm Reich. In his time he was Sigmund Freud's assistant. Then, however, he dispersed with the famous teacher in views. In 1928 he joined the Communist party of Germany, and in 1929 he founded the Association of proletarian sexual politics - «Sexpol ». It might seem unbelievable, but in 1931 Congress of «Sexpol» in Dusseldorf collected 20 thousand people. It is interesting that some of the books by Reich were forbidden both by the Communists and the Nazis. In 1939 he moved to the USA together with his lab by invitation of the «New school of social research». In the West Wilhelm Reich's ideas had a marked influence on the «New left». In the 30s his most famous book «Sexual revolution» was published and then republished many times. By the way, it was the first time when the term «Sexual revolution» was used. Half of this fundamental work is dedicated to events in Soviet Russia.

In the Russian sexual revolution there was a lot of confusing and contradictory things. Many misunderstandings were due to the fact that every-one understood freedom of love in their own ways. The understanding of highly educated and sophisticated feminists sometimes were greatly differed from the views of less educated and rather rough proletarian and peasant masses. If Alexandra Kollontai and Inessa Armand imagined freedom of love as removing of barriers to large passionate feelings – a winged Eros, young workers, soldiers and sailors- young people with playing hormones saw it only as an opportunity for unhampered satisfaction of their unlimited sexual needs. Very quickly freedom of morals and sexual permissiveness reached such huge scales in the Soviet Russia that even Lenin started to worry about it.

The theory of a glass of water

" _Although, I am not a grim ascetic, but so-called new sexual life of young people, and sometimes adults, quite often seems as a kind of good bawdy house. (...) You know the famous theory that in Communist society it is as easy to satisfy sexual aspirations and the need of love as just to drink a glass of water. From this «theory of glass of water» our young people went mad, just hit the ceiling » (...)._

«Of course, thirst demands satisfaction. But can a normal person under normal conditions lie down on the street in the dirt and drink from puddles? Or even from a glass, edge of which had been touched by dozens of lips? »

«I think the famous «theory of a glass of water» was not Marxist and moreover antisocial» (...) «the Theory of a glass of water» «is not new and not communist. You probably remember that this theory is preached in fine literature in the middle of the last century as the «emancipation of heart. » In bourgeois practice it turned out to be emancipation of body. »

Fragments of conversation with Vladimir Lenin with the German Communist and feminist Clara Zetkin in 1920

It is interesting that this conversation was published in Soviet Russia only in 1925, when the leader was no longer alive. The question arises, why Lenin complained about «crazy youth» to foreigners, but never spoke about it directly to the members of the organization. Why didn't he stop the sexual revolution, it was in his power! Probably because he considered the strategic direction to be quite correct, but some problems and distortions to be inevitable. A lot of mass media wrote about the theory «a glass of water» in that time, a lot of discussions of Komsomol youth were dedicated to it. The wise leader of proletariat preferred not to interfere in the excruciatingly difficult searches for new forms of family and sexual relations directly.

Subsequently, they said that Alexandra Kolontai was the author of the theory of «a glass of water», referring to her article «the Road to winged Eros! ». Although there she, on the contrary, defended the «winged Eros» - associated with spiritual closeness against «a wingless Eros» - who was a symbol of a purely physical attraction. As for the «glass of water», this theory is not even mentioned in any of her works. The modern researcher Dushenko Konstantin got to the truth after a long search. He found out that the authors of the theory of « emancipation of the flesh», which Lenin mentioned in an interview with Clara Zetkin, actually were not jaded bourgeois, but socialists adherents of Saint-Simon. But Frederic Chopin's friend was the first who spoke about a glass of water for the first time. «LOVE is LIKE a GLASS of WATER, it is GIVEN to THE one WHO ASKS» - these words were said by the supporter of emancipation -the famous French writer Aurora Dyupen, more known under her male pseudonym George Sand.

###  Get rid of shame!

In the course of the Russian-sexual revolution the initiative of some enthusiasts greatly amazed, and sometimes simply shocked. Quite popular in the higher strata of the European society nudism suddenly began to acquire aggressive exhibitionistic form in Soviet Russia. A famous writer, the author of the cult novel «Master and Margarita» Mikhail Bulgakov wrote in his diary on the 12th September 1924: «the News. Recently completely naked people appeared in Moscow. Men and women. Bandages over their shoulders said «Get rid of shame! ». They got into a tram. The tram stopped. The public boiled over».

Blessed by Communists and with the support of anarchists in Russia there appeared a society «Get rid of shame» whose activists demonstratively walked about naked. They claimed shame as a relic of the bourgeois past. Traditional in Orthodox Russian Church Procession was already banned in that period, but the parades of naked people were allowed by authorities even in the center of Moscow, right by the walls of the Kremlin on the Red square. And it was not surprising because the society «Get rid of shame! » was headed by Karl Radek – a known figure in the international Communist movement closely associated with Bolsheviks' leaders. It was Karl Radek who was heading the biggest parade of naked people consisted of about 10 thousand militant nudists. The picture must have been very impressive! According to some sources, this Grand parade was visited by Stalin. Probably, that was the reason that no film of photo materials survived, they might have been destroyed in the 30s, when the era of Stalinism erased any memory of sexual revolution.

Actions of society «Get rid of shame! » in the 20s were a favourite source of jokes and anecdotes. In October 1924 a magazine in Kharkov «Red wasp» wrote ironically: «Naked again. The Department of demographic statistics reported that yesterday in Kharkov there were 18 naked people. Childbirths in all cases were successful».

Soviet Russia of that period looked like a «country of nudists» and made a lasting impression on foreigners. Winner of Pulitzer Prize X. R. Knikerborger, while traveling on the banks of the Moskva River, was struck by a number of naked bodies. Mass children's rest also developed in compliance with the ideas of nudism. Judging by the archival shot children swam without clothes even in the pioneer camp «Artek».

Lenin and Nikolay II were nudists

Among thousands and thousands of monuments to Lenin there is probably not a single one which portrayed him naked. Meanwhile, the author of such a sculpture would not sin against the truth of history - in fact; Vladimir Ilyich was a supporter of nudism.

Movement of nudists (naturists) appeared in Germany and Austria at the turn of 19th-20th centuries. Naked body for naturists became a symbol of a return to nature, natural and healthy lifestyle. On the beaches and in other places of rest nudists spent time with no clothes on, throwing a challenge to a sense of false shame and social conventions. Nudists preached sobriety, smoking cessation, gymnastics, and vegetarianism. In Russia supporters of the movement included such prominent figures as Leo Tolstoy and Maximilian Voloshin. Nudism gained sympathy among Russian revolutionaries as well. That was not surprising - after all, they perceived naturism like a revolution in the field of culture and health. Being in Austria, emigrant Vladimir Ulyanov visited a nudist beach and the visit made a favorable impression on him. He strongly spoke up in favor of a «healthy lifestyle», which was preached by nudists. His wife Nadezhda Konstantinovna Krupskaya also shared these ideas. There were other prominent Bolsheviks among supporters of nudism - for example, Anatoly Lunacharsky, Nikolai Bukharin, Alexander Bogdanov...

... By the way, last Russian Emperor Nicholas II was also a nudist. (There is a film: the naked Emperor dives into the river, and all his family were dressed in the same suit.) At the end of the 20th century there was a joke among Russian nudists: «If Lenin and Nicholas II met in some club of naturists, revolution might not have happened»...

Alexander Maysuryan, from the book «Another Lenin»

It should be noted that the tradition of parades of naked, which begun in the Soviet Russia in the 20s, is continued successfully in our days in many Western countries. Perhaps the most famous was the "London World Naked Bike Ride" –an international naked bike ride, which is held annually on the streets of the British capital. It is attended by several thousand people!

###  A commune instead of the family

The main task of sexual revolution was the destruction of traditional family and transition to a fundamentally new relationship between a man and a woman based only on love. Sexual communism was the basis of a new family policy. Freedom of marriage has reached unimaginable levels and led to emergence of unprecedented family forms in Europe.

Marriages for every taste

«Such a diversity of marital relations had not been known in history before: a stable marriage with a «strong family» and a number of free affairs, secret adultery in marriage and open cohabitation of a girl with her lover-a wild marriage, marriage of couples and marriage of «three», and even a complicated form of marriage «four of them together», we don't speak about varieties of purchasable prostitution... Controversial and complicated forms of the communion of marriage today... have nothing to hide: old family dies».

Alexandra Kollontai, «Family and a communist state », 1918

The main sexual revolutionary of the Soviet Russia considered «serial monogamy» to be the ideal form of marriage, that is, the couple marriage, but not to the grave, as it had happened before, but one after the other. Because from her own experience Alexandra Kollontai knew one love is rarely enough for the whole life. Therefore, there must be many weddings for every person. By the way, this idea was preached even by Plato in the framework of an ideal state.

In his utopia marriage is concluded for a year, and then another marriage so that every man had fifteen –twenty wives for the life, and every woman had fifteen to twenty men. Children, so that they do not become a burden, according to Plato, should be given to the state soon after birth. Thus, instead of the conventional family, where many people live without love, there were only love unions in the ideal state of Plato , and these unions appeared and splitted up every year.

We must say that in the modern world Plato's utopia has become a reality for many people- we've got a lot of couples which appear and split up every year... the only problem is children. Therefore, women give birth to fewer and fewer children.

However, let's get back to the 20s, to the time of the first sexual revolution. Unlike ancient Greek philosopher, Russian sexual revolutionists understood that in the family besides love, there is the household, which took a lot of women's time in those years. Because there was no kitchen combine, no automatic washing machines, no almost ready meals from the supermarket, as it is now. Housewives did almost everything by hands: washed in the tub and stood near the cooker for hours. That is why the slogan «Let's get rid of the kitchen slavery!» was one of the most popular among the revolutionary-minded women.

In order to prevent the household from chaining freedom of love it was supposed to be canceled, turning it to public. It was assumed that the new Communist state would free women from unpleasant work and inefficient domestic labor would be replaced by much more effective public services. Public canteens had to be created, as well as kitchens and laundries, workshops on clothes repair service. The new society not only had to free from the burdens of household, but also to take care of the children. It was supposed that in nurseries and kindergartens kids would be looked after by experienced teachers and students would be provided with free food, housing and clothing. Alexandra Kollontai called on women not to divide children into their own and others: «Be a mother not only for your child, but also for all children! » Children of Communards were to be treated as children of the commune and be brought up at the expense of public funds.

Houses of the commune

«...Houses- communes for families and especially for single ones are now widespread. In no other country there were so many hostels, as it was in the Republic of labor. And notice, everybody wanted to settle in the house -commune. Not from the «principle»of course, not of belief, as it was done by utopians in the first half of the 19th century, following the teaching of Fourier, organizing impractical, artificial « phalansteries», but because it was much more convenient and handy to live in a house-commune. House-communes were always much better equipped than private apartments; they were fully provided with fuel and lighting. They often had a cube with boiling water, Central kitchen. Cleaning was done by professional cleaners. In some houses there was a Central Laundry, in others there was a nursery or kindergarten. ...The inhabitants of houses-communes were jealous by all who lived in private apartments».

Alexandra Kollontai, «Revolution of household», 1920

Houses-communes were popular in the Soviet Russia not only in starving times of after- war communism (until 1921), but also during the period that followed, the new economic policy -NEP. Even housing construction began to be oriented on a non-traditional form of a family. In Moscow and St. Petersburg now you can see buildings which were erected in the 20-30s as houses- communes. Usually constructivist style which was fashionable in those times. «Model regulations on the house- commune», which was approved in 1928, instructed new tenants- communards to refuse from accumulated by previous generations furniture and old household items when they moved in. All issues were supposed to be settled by the collective solution, from bringing up children to washing, cleaning, cooking and satisfying their cultural needs».

Very few people know about communes of the 20s in modern Russia. But this interesting experience in our time found a successful continuation in the West. In France eco communes appeared, which even gathered into a net of mutual help and spread in Italy and Greece. In Germany, Denmark, Check republic and Great Britain communes started to appear in captured empty buildings, squats.

The inverse image of a Swedish

«We tend to think that «a Swedish family», i.e. cohabitation of many people of both sexes is a purely Swedish invention. It turned out that this was our invention, purely Russian».

«...Batkis wrote in his pamphlet « Sexual revolution in the Soviet Union» in 1923: «the purpose of sexual pedagogy in the USSR is education of healthy people, citizens of the future society in the full harmony between natural desires and great social objectives that are waiting for them... Proletarian commune with its freedom of relationships must help them». The argumentation was that if marriage is a relic of the bourgeois past, Komsomol commune is the family of the future».

« Komsomol commune was the usual thing of the past. Usually about 10-12 people of both sexes lived in this «family» on a voluntary basis, like in a current «Swedish family». This team had a common household and sexual life. Gradually sexual communities have spread to all major cities of the country».

«The perfect in this sense was the labor commune GPU for homeless people in Bolshevo, established in 1924 on the personal order of Dzerzhinsky. There were about 1 thousand of juvenile offenders from 12 to 18 years old, about 300 of them were girls. The educators of the commune approved the «joint sexual experiences, girls and boys lived in the same barracks. Thus, we can say that the commune in Bolshevo was (and remains) the largest «Swedish family» in history. »

Paul Prianikov «Free Press»

Perhaps Paul Prianikov greatly exaggerated, calling the commune for juvenile offenders the biggest «Swedish family» in history. Because his certainty was only based on his fantasies, rather than direct evidence, which, alas, has not survived.

###  Sexual counterrevolution

In 1922 Alexandra Kollontai was sent to an honory exile to diplomatic work. She continued to write about problems of relationship between men and women, but she was doing it being far away. A significant part of Bolshevik leaders rejected the revolutionary ideas of the red feminist. Her views were called vulgar- anarchist.

By the beginning of 30s sexual revolution was gradually rolling down. In 1934 criminal responsibility for homosexual relations was introduced again. If in the midst of sexual revolution free love was declared as a protest against conscience of the bourgeois marriage, in the 1930s not only this kind of relations was condemned, but even natural sexuality as well. Young people were encouraged to keep sexual abstinence and to strengthen the family. People's Commissar of health explained the youth that they needed to change attitude to sexual politics: «You must deny pleasures because they have harmful impact on your main goal – study and your intention to become active participants in building of new life... the State is still too poor to take responsibility for financial help to you, upbringing of children and provision of parents. So our advice is chastity. »

The collapse of sexual revolution

«We can no longer refer to sexual freedom of the Soviet youth, as we see the turmoil that has gripped Western European youth as they don't understand what is happening in the USSR.

...We read and hear that in the Soviet Union they magnify and «strengthen» a forced family again. »

Fighting for rational sexual education of children and the youth, we always referred to successes of the Soviet Union in this field. But for some years we haven't heard about any new achievements, except the fact that the ideology of asceticism takes more severe forms.

What happened? Why does sexual response prevail? Why did sexual revolution collapse? »

Wilhelm Reich «Sexual revolution»

A considerable part of the fundamental book by the famous German psychologist is devoted to analysis of the reasons for this collapse. He sees them in «absence of doctrine about sexual revolution, which would correspond to the depth of the happened upheaval» and ads: «we should not forget that the Soviet sexual revolution was the first revolution of the kind».

Indeed, the Soviet sexual revolution didn't have a real theory. There were only common phrases and arguments of Marx, Engels and Lenin. And even Alexandra Kollontai in her works saved no ink painting a bright future, but she went away from specific details. But in details hides the devil! People wanted to know how to solve this or that particular problem. They asked tough questions, but the answers were not given.

Issues are silenced

«...Zeitlin proved that he had a revolutionary instinct, saying: «Issuers of marriage and the family are absolutely not illuminated in literature, the issue of relations between a man and a woman. But those are the issuers which are interesting for workers of both sexes. When we bring up these issues at meetings, workers know about it, they come to our meetings. Besides, people feel that these issues have been silenced, and we really keep silence about them.

In his turn, a functionary Finkovskiy soon discovered a certain aspect of the essence of sexual fear: « Talks on this theme are rarely brought up because they are too personal to everyone... They were not brought up, in my opinion, in order not to spoil blood. Everybody understands that the way out can be in taking upbringing and supporting all children of workers by the state (keeping them somewhere close to their parents), deliverance of women from the kitchen chores and other things. Communists usually refer to this great future thereby relieving this acute issue from further discussion...»

...It is understood by the party worker Markov: «I warn that colossal disaster is coming to us in the sense that we have misunderstood the concept of «free love». The result was that Communists have made kids from this love...»

Wilhelm Reich «Sexual revolution»

Children became the main problem. Soviet Russia, devastated by the civil war, could hardly raised its economy and could not actually provide all children with public and free education , as it was written in the «Manifesto of Communist party». Therefore they could not create a new type of family, based on only love and not burdened by the household. It was believed that the main issue was economy, but sex issuers could be solved later. Ultimately old has won over the new. Sexual revolution in the USSR collapsed. However, it happened not only because of pure financial difficulties connected with children. It was important that the Soviet society in general was not able to overcome lies and hypocrisy in the relationships between men and women.

###  The key issue

Leaders who had even no courage to discuss the most complicated issue of sexual life in family with people, of course could not approve their decision in the spirit of sexual revolution. But the problem of «love triangle» is sooner or later faced by almost every couple. Marriage unions and people die there much more often than ships in the Bermuda triangle.

Although this problem is as old as the world. In the conditions of pre-revolutionary bourgeois family it often existed in the form of adultery. Husband secretly met a mistress, wife a lover. It was called « unfaithfulness». Many families have lived like that for centuries. When the secret suddenly became clear, family often collapsed. In some cases it even ended in suicide or murder of the unfaithful wife, or a lover.

Pangs of jealousy

«You should think about jealousy, which, as a rule, is ignored by high politics, but which, nevertheless, plays a much more significant role behind the scenes of major political events than you can guess. It is worth thinking about people's fear of inability to find a suitable partner, when they lose the former one, even if relationship with him was a continuous torment.

It is worth thinking about thousands of murders of partners, which happened only because it was unbearable to imagine, as a close person holds another person in his arms, driven by sexual intentions. And this fact plays a much bigger role in life...»

Wilhelm Reich «Sexual revolution»

Sexual revolution which preached free love, offered quite unusual, but quite a reasonable approach: not to split up a family because of a triangle, but to extend it, not to kill the opponent or a rival, but to be friends with them. The appeals like: «Wives, be friends with your husbands' lovers » became quite normal or «A good wife picks up an appropriate lover for her husband, and a husband recommends his friends to his wife». Life of three people living together was not uncommon. Perhaps the most famous was the family with participation of the famous poet Vladimir Mayakovsky, Lily and Osip Brik.

It should be noted that this very unusual way of solving the problem of «love triangle» was tried in Russia before revolution, not in communes, but in the circles of Bohemia. At the turn of the century poets, writers and philosophers verified new forms of family on their own experience. Marriage of three people was practiced in different combinations: two men and one woman or two women and one man. Perhaps many will be surprised to know that among the most famous sexual experimenters were such famous artists as Gippius, Merezhkovsky and Philosophers; Block, Mendeleyev and White, Vyacheslav Ivanov, Sinovyeva Anibal and Margarita Voloshina.

During the sexual revolution their movement was continued by members of Communist Youth League. In the 20s the most popular youth newspaper in the country «Komsomolskaya Pravda» wrote a story when once a young mother in a maternity hospital was visited by two fathers at the same time. As it found out, the woman was the wife of both of them and she could not be sure who the real father of a new born son was. All of them were Komsomol members and students of the faculty of workers. They were not hiding their diminished heads and were not afraid of other people's eyes at all. They called it love for three; they didn't hide it from anyone and even tried to find a theoretical «justification» for it. They considered that love of Komsomol members knew no jealousy, deprived of private instincts and could be collective easily.

We need to note that there were a lot of similar facts in those days. They were even shown in films. In 1927 there was a film on this topic, it was an art melodrama called «The third Meschanskaya » («Love for three »). But there wasn't a usual «happy end » in the film. Because the afficial attitude to sexual experiments was rather critical. They couldn't even think about propaganda of such experience in the end of the 20s. The party took the course to get back to traditional forms of the family. Consequently the way of solving problems of the «love triangle » came back to the one which was used before. Again they came back to lies and hypocrisy, with unavoidable murders and suicides... It was considered to be the normal solution, in contradistinction to love for three people.

Step by step sexual revolution was gradually strangled together with the New Economic Policy and freedom of entrepreneurship. All the memory about it was cleared so thoroughly, that after a few decades few people remembered about the first the world scale experiment in sex field in the USSR. All sexual culture, - erotic art, scientific researches and sex education –everything was ruthlessly uprooted. From 1936 until 1961, in the Soviet Union they had produced only two books with the mention of the word «sex». In the library not all doctors could get them. Sociological research didn't even touch sexual life. Thus instead of boundless freedom of love and flourishing nudism there were strict Puritan rules.

Puritanical strictnesses

«In the end of 1950s shorts appeared in the USSR for the first time, but you had to be brave to wear them even at the resorts of Crimea and Caucasus. By the order of the local authorities men in shorts were served neither in shops nor in the cafeteria or in the hairdresser's. Seeing somebody driving a car in shorts, the police could stop the car and ask the person to change clothes immediately. Local residents said that shorts insulted their moral feelings. ...Low-cut dresses and traditional tunics were prosecuted vigorously as well».

Igor Kon, from the book «Strawberry on the birch. Sexual culture in Russia»

It is clear that in such conditions the parade of naked people in the Red square couldn't even be seen by anybody in a terrible dream. Moreover, sexual revolution wasn't even mentioned in textbooks of history. And in the middle of 80s once there was a question on a popular TV show when Americans asked about situation with sex among Soviet people, it was openly stated that «there is no sex in the USSR! ».
Chapter 7.

###  Eros and Civilization

The League of sexual reforms *American studies and experiments * The second sexual revolution * Sexual education and sexual culture __ Pornography as a mirror of morality

###

###  The League of sexual reforms

Sexual revolution in Soviet Russia contributed to many changes in the West in the same way as the October revolution in Russia in 1917 contributed to the revolution in Germany in November 1918. In 1919 German psychiatrist and psychoanalyst Magnus Hirschfield created an Institute of sexual science in Berlin, who was the first in the world to try to find solutions to medical, consulting, educational problems in this area and it was turned into a recognized research center of Europe. Magnus Hirschfield headed the Institute till 1933 when it was destroyed by the Nazis. A large archive and research library were barbarously burned in the square. Such institution has never been restored again, neither in Germany nor in Europe.

However, let's go back to the 20s. In 1921 the Hirschfield Institute organized « the First academic conference on reform on issues of sex-based research sexology» in Berlin. In order to join all the efforts in the global scale in 1928 they established a world League for sexual reforms at the Congress in Copenhagen. It covered most of progressive researchers of sexual problems and supporters of sexual reforms worldwide. At the peak of popularity of this international organization there were about one hundred thirty thousand members. Its program included the following items:

1. Political, economic and sexual equality of women.

2. The release of marriage (especially divorce) from the guardianship of the Church and the state.

3. Birth control in accordance with the principles of birth giving with a sense of responsibility.

4. Eugenic influence on offsprings.

5. Protection of single mothers and children born out of wedlock.

6. Proper assessment of options of intersex relations, particularly homosexuality of men and women.

7. Prevention of prostitution and venereal diseases.

8. Perception of violations of sexual attraction not as it was before in the form of crimes, kins, or vices, but as more or less painful phenomena.

9. Sexual- criminal law, which makes only actual interference in sexual freedom of another person punishable, but does not interfere in actual sexual relations, based on matching of adults' desires.

10. Systematic sex upbringing and education

The Soviet Union was also represented in this international organization. The fifth Congress of the world League of sexual reform was planned to be held in Moscow in 1931, however, for unknown reasons, it was not held. The last Congress was in 1932, in Czechoslovak city of Brno. In 1935, shortly after death of Magnus Hirschfield the world League of sexual reform was dissolved. The important role was played by defeat of the Institute of sexual science in Berlin; after all, there was the main office of this international organization. The idea to create a new Institute in Paris failed.

Magnus Hirschfield made such a tremendous contribution to the development of sexual science, that it was often compared to the famous physicist Albert Einstein, whose revolutionary ideas turned understanding of mankind about the world structure. After many years in the end of the twentieth century there was a film in Germany «Einstein of sex», dedicated to Hirschfield.

It should be noted that the scientist had a non-traditional sexual orientation, and was the founder of the "Movement for Emancipation of German gays." An international Fund to protect the rights of bisexuals, gays and lesbians was founded in 2007 in Berlin and was called after him.

###  American research works and experiments

After the end of the Second World War the USA became the most advanced country in sexology. The center of scientific researches moved there. Although they began working long before the war. In 1935 the famous biologist Alfred Kinsey time criticized the «widespread ignorance of the structure and physiology of genital organs» at a workshop at Indiana University for the first. In addition, he proposed a quite revolutionary for the Puritan America assumption that «the delay of marriage» or, in other words, delay of first sexual experience is very harmful from a psychological point of view. It means sexual abstinence, which moralists imposed to the youth, actually has negative consequences.

Having received financial support from Rockefeller Foundation, Alfred Kinsey began long-term studies. Together with his staff he interviewed about 18 thousand people across America. As the result the famous «Kinsey Reports» appeared. This fundamental research consisted of two parts. The first part of «Sexual Behavior of male human» was released in 1948. The second part - « Sexual behavior of female human» was published in 1953.

These books became bestsellers at once and still (!!!) remain in the list of well-selling scientific literature. They have made Dr. Kinsey a celebrity and have caused stormy discussions. In his writings he raised quite sensitive topics of homosexuality and prostitution. Sensational conclusions of Dr. Kinsey, the results of years of research, shocked America.

The country suddenly learned with amazement that the vast majority of its citizens practiced masturbation and premarital sex. Almost half of white Americans are unfaithful to their wives, and nearly forty percent of men had ever had a sexual contact with a partner of the same sex. However, opponents of Dr. Kinsey were trying to refute the shocking conclusions and accused him of improper investigation methods and of a slander on respectable American society.

Alfred Kinsey doubted about the truth which was immutable for centuries. For example, premarital virginity. In his second book, «Sexual Behaviour of female human » the scientist claimed that women, who had premarital sex, have more chances for a happy marriage. Dr. Kinsey received huge public resonance. He is rightly called «the father of sexual revolution», which took place in the countries of the West a little later in the 60s.

Alfred Kinsey wasn't scared of scandalous fame, but inspired William Masters and Virginia Johnson to carry out even more ambitious researches. For the first time in the history of science they started studying the physiology of sexual act, knowing what moral and psychological difficulties they would encounter with. Here's what they wrote about it in the late 50s:

State of the science is defined by fear

«... state of the science and the behavior of scientists are still defined by fear - they are afraid of public opinion, religious intolerance, political pressure, and most of all \- fanaticism and prejudice-not only outside, but also inside of the professional community».

William Masters and Virginia Johnson

William Masters, the Professor of gynecology at the University of Washington, and his assistant, and later wife, Johnson invited hundreds of volunteers aged 18 to 89 years. If Dr. Kinsey with his colleagues just interviewed people about their sexual life, Masters and Johnson offered the experiments to get an orgasm right in their scientific laboratory. Within 10 years they studied about 700 men and women, observed and analyzed more than 10 000 sexual acts. The volunteers, whose services were well paid, were filmed. In addition, they were watched with the help of sensitive medical devices, and some women were even filmed from inside before and after orgasm by using tiny cameras placed in transparent artificial penises, which were injected into their vaginas. So for the first time they got scientific evidence about what actually happened in sexual organs of a woman during sex. In result sensational discoveries were made.

The mystery of injured veterans

During the Second World War millions of men were injured. Often soldiers lost limbs: hands and feet, but there were enough exotic shrapnel wounds. It is known that in the Soviet Union there were 30 thousand veterans with half-cut penises. In erection state instead of 15-20 centimeters many of them had only 5...

However, their wives were quite happy. This fact amazed doctors, because it was believed that satisfaction of women directly depended on the size of the male phallus. Everybody was convinced that, in principle, it was impossible to achieve orgasm with a tiny penis.

Researches by William Masters and Virginia Johnson denied this centuries-old misleading and helped unravel the mystery of injured veterans. It found out that the overwhelming majority of women reach orgasm through clitoris which is located near the labia. So to get satisfaction there is no need to penetrate at all.

The main goal of all these studies was to make sexual life happier, because many problems appear from elementary ignorance. Masters and Johnson also conducted medical therapy with the use of specially trained sexual partners. However, later the cooperation with such sex instructors had to be stopped because of ethical and legal reasons.

The Result of long-term researches by William Masters and Virginia Johnson was the work of «Sexual reactions of a human being» published in 1966. In 1970, their next book was released, «Sexual inferiority of a person». Over time these books have gained prominence. They gave Masters and Johnson the opportunity to found their own Institute.

###  The second sexual revolution

The second sexual revolution occurred in the West in the end of 60s and beginning of 70s. Student riots in France and America put a start to it. The youth then violently protested against sexual segregation in hostels. By the way, now in educational buildings of universities Sarbona in Paris even toilets are the same for both sexes.

One of the main theorists of sexual revolution was a philosopher Herbert Marcuse, who published the book «Eros and civilization» in 1955. We must say that his texts were not considered to be popular and accessible to the public. For many people, they were too complicated not only for understanding, but even for reading.

Eros against Death

«Nowadays this Union of freedom and slavery became «natural» and turned into a tool of progress. Prosperity increasingly seems to be an assumption and a by-product of self-moving driving productivity, which constantly needs new areas of consumption and objects of destruction both outside and inside of a man, but at the same time retains from «transfusion» to pockets of poverty - both at home and abroad. Regarding this amalgam of freedom and aggression, production and destruction, image of human freedom founds out to be upside down: it becomes the draft of subversion of this type of progress. The release of instinctive needs in the peace and quiet, as well as in «asocial» autonomous Eros involves liberation from oppressive abundance: change of the progress direction.

... Erotic energy of Life Instincts can't be free in conditions of dehumanized profusion, based on profit.

...«By nature» the youth is at the forefront of the struggle for Eros against Death and against civilization, which aims to shorten «a roundabout way to death»

Herbert Marcuse, «Eros and civilization», the Political Preface 1966...

Marcuse considered Eros to be the most effective way to overcome negative consequences of modern civilization. However it requires a transformation of sexuality in Eros, in the result of which not only sensuality is converted, but also mind and will of a man.

In conditions of the second sexual revolution, the gap between high-philosophical theory and everyday practice was much more than it was observed during the first sexual revolution in Russia. At least, Alexandra Kollontai expressed her ideas in a more popular way. However, her «winged Eros» was just as far from sexual requests of simple proletarians, as philosophy of Herbert Marcuse from student orgies. In 1968 he saw as his ideas were implemented in practice in one of the Western Berlin communes of «healthy orgasm». «Forced and mournful nature» of indiscriminate sexual relations practiced there shocked the elderly theorist of sexual revolution. However, this was not surprising. Young Berlin communards, seen by Herbert Marcuse, would have hardly been interested in his works. They lived their own lives and understanding of sexual revolution. Their main slogan was «Make love - not war!»

Recollection about the Swedish commune

«In Sweden there is no really such a stable notion as «a Swedish family». In the 50s there was a designation «married like in Stockholm ». Then people lived together, without getting married officially. In the 60s and 70s, «left», closely connected with hippie movement, introduced a new shade in the so-called cohabitation.

... I also lived in a collective or a commune, call it as you want. It was in the city of Karlstad. We slept together in the same bed, although every person had his own room. And, of course, it was not surprising that I was with Sousse on Monday but with Anna on Tuesday. The only condition was mutual desire.

An inevitable side effect - a wild flowering of venereal diseases at that time. Only this fact returned many people to normal way of life. »

Per Dalberg journalist of «Swedish Radio »

Legalized abortion was considered the main achievement of sexual revolution in the West, together with legalization of pornography and homosexual relationships and widespread availability of contraceptives. These transformations in some countries took place earlier, in others - later. The process stretched for decades. Although it is believed that by the end of the 70s sexual revolution in the West had ended, and society became more conservative and moderate. However, the situation didn't return to the old standards, as it happened after the collapse of sexual revolution in Soviet Russia. Moreover, the Western society actually continued to move towards greater freedom of relations, but without student epatage, at a more serious legislative level.

Legalized abortion

In the age of early Christianity an abortion was identified with the murder of a man. In the Middle Ages abortion was qualified as a grave crime, similar to the murder of a relative. Therefore, in almost all European countries (England, Germany, and France) abortions were punishable by death penalty. Later it was replaced by a long-term hard labour and imprisonment. Both the doctor and the patient were punished. Such situation was kept in many countries until the first half of the twentieth century. Soviet Russia was the first country in the world which made abortions legal. Published in 1920 the decree «About artificial termination of pregnancy» let mothers and doctors kill conceived but not yet born children without being punished.

The majority of Western countries dared do that only after half a century in the result of the victory of sexual revolution. (By the time the Soviet Union already had time to forbid abortions under Stalin in the 30s, and then allow again under Khrushchev 50s) In the UK legalization of abortions was in 1967, in the USA and Denmark in 1973, France and Austria - in 1975, in Germany only in 1976. According to the population Division of the UN Secretariat, in our time, the performance of an abortion on a woman's request is permitted in 55 of 194 countries of the world. But it is only 28% of countries. However, this group includes almost all industrially developed States and China, representing more than 40% of population of the planet.

Russia has the most liberal legislation in the world in the field of termination of their own offsprings. It's not surprising that by 49 years for every Russian woman there are ,on average, one and a half born child and three artificial interruptions of pregnancy. Three murders, according to the old pre-revolutionary legal norms.

In Soviet times, Latvia had the same index as Russia, and now the number of abortions per woman decreased by half. What miracle has helped to achieve such results? Only mandatory listening to the heartbeat of the future child, not only by the doctor but also by the patient. According to experts it became one of the most effective measures which helped to restore healthy maternal instinct for many women. It is not clear what prevents Russia and other European countries to learn from this experience?

###

###  Sexual education and sexual culture

Among the elderly, who are opposed to sexual education, the most common objection is: what is there to teach? We already know what and where to thrust! Nobody has taught us to do anything. »

What can we answer? A man, unlike an animal, adds culture to his life processes in addition to pure physiology. After all the fact that food must be put in the mouth is also known. However, there is a culture of behavior at the table. And it has been taught since ancient times! Nobody is surprised and asks why we need that. Because everybody understands that food can be eaten beautifully or obscenely like by a pig. The same thing is in intimate sphere, where, as it is known, there are much more subtleties and nuances, than during repast. Only promoting beautiful love we can effectively resist primitive pornography and bawdry, which have swamped our world. Sexual culture must come instead of sexual wildness! It is obvious that it can't come itself. It needs to be taught.

Sex education at schools

«Sexual illumination at schools must begin from the age of 12-13. Otherwise we will face such excesses as early pregnancy. It's not rare that the age of childbearing today is 14 years».

Alexandra Kollontai

These words were written by the main ideologist of the first sexual revolution, almost a hundred years ago, but they still have not lost their relevance for Russia. At the round table on the problems of sexual education in schools, the well-known TV presenter and member of the Commission of the Public chamber of the Russian Federation on development of education Tina Kandelaki gave evidence that in Russia per 1000 of teen girls there are more than 100 pregnancies. For comparison: in the Netherlands, where sexual education in schools is compulsory, only 8 per 1,000 girls get pregnant. According to this indicator, Russia is the world leader in the number of abortions.

It's a paradox, but the anatomy course in schools, which contains at least some facts about sexual life, is being reduced. They don't even dream of introduction of sex education. Some primeval «saviors of Russia» see it as almost a threat to national security. In a massy book «Project Russia» they seriously claim that «CIA kills Russia by implanting of sexual education». It's funny, but some patriots of America said the same half a century ago. Only instead of CIA they were afraid of «Soviet threat». In 1969, the leader of American ultra-right-wing Robert Welch said that school sex education is a «dirty Communist complot to undermine the spiritual health of the American youth».

In 1936 Wilhelm Reich noted that sex education often served as a mean of deception, as it was focused on biology, not concealed sexual excitation - the awakening, which was the most interesting for a sexually mature individual. Since then, alas, little has changed. Nowadays, even in advanced countries, where there is a sex education, it is far from being perfect. Lessons are generally very primitive and touch upon only basic physiological processes, problems of protection against pregnancy and diseases, as well as inculcate tolerance to homosexual relations. Sexuality is not associated with spirituality and is not taught to love in a broad sense. Although it is possible and necessary to teach love from the very early age.

Say, many parents often do not know what to tell kids on the issue of birth. The most simple and the most beautiful explanation of how babies are born is - they are born from love. From love of men and women. And then both have a new love for their children. If there is no love, the conceived children are simply killed, not allowing them to be born. We need to talk about it openly and honestly as well, but already in school. We must bring up demographic consciousness from childhood and convince that preservation of ethnos and national culture depends not so much on folk songs and dances, but on love to their offsprings even if they were conceived not in time.

Of course, this approach is fundamentally contrary to dominant feminist ideas about the unconditional right of women to murder their unborn children in the framework of so-called «family planning». Militant feminists of homosexual orientation often determine the direction of sexual education. Therefore, in Europe now there is neither width of approaching to solve the problems, which was at the time of first sexual revolution in Soviet Russia, nor the depth of studying of sexual relationship, which was characteristic to the Institute for sexual science of Hirscheld and the League of sexual reform.

It's surprising but for several decades no systematic textbooks for sexual education in schools have been created , which could be published, translated and used in different countries. It was the amazing challenge which enthusiasts came across who tried to promote sex education in Russia. Educators from the West only offered them silly pathetic brochures.

Meanwhile, in Sweden, which is considered to be the most advanced country in this area, the national Association of sexual education (RFSU) was founded in 1933. Its activities were started with subterranean distribution of condoms, as their legal sale was then banned. And now half of its 10 million Euro budget the Association generates from revenues from own enterprise producing rubber condoms. The promotion of these products around the world is one of the main tasks of the Swedish educators.

There is an impression that they are not interested in more serious projects. The best thing they can do is to carry out surveys on the themes of sexual life. Surprisingly, that there is even no relevant scientific and educational museum in this «most sexually advanced» country. In 2009, the Institute of sexual culture and family (ISCIS), created in Kaliningrad, suggested the Association of sexual education (RFSU) to initiate creation of the Stockholm Museum of sex education and the family together , but in response the Swedes said that the Museum does not fit the framework of their sexual education.

Museums of erotica, existing in different countries of the world, tend to have very superficial chaotic exposures with a focus on spicy exotic. They are more like entertainment booths, rather than centers of knowledge of essential sphere for every person. It was assumed that the Museum of sex education and family in Stockholm should differ from already existing museums in Europe of sex and eroticism by a more serious and more systemic exposure. According to the project it should be not entertaining, but informative. It was planned to create interesting sections telling about sexual culture in different countries and sexual traditions in different historical epochs, about different forms of family and stages of its development. As well as about successful historical experience of the solution of demographic problems in Europe.

Nowadays many historical museums acquaint visitors with history of wars, that is, with a history of mass murders. But visitors will hardly find anything about the closest to each person's themes - love and sex life. History of sex education and family is not presented practically anywhere! In the best case, ethnographic exhibits tell only about living conditions of the family. But this is not enough to have an idea about sexual life of people of a particular era. Only learning the experience of previous centuries could help to solve current problems in this sphere.

Recently avalanche of free pornographic content on the Internet started undermining interest to piquant museums. Museum of erotic art in Copenhagen closed in 2010 as it couldn't withstand the competition. This frightening example might finally make think about the need to make adjustments in the exhibition. Some similar museums have been trying to focus more attention on scientific and cognitive topics. But there are problems with the lack of strong scientific base not only in Europe, but worldwide.

Sexuality in the Modern World

Before the research, which aim was to generalize information about human sexuality in a global context, we come across some difficulties:

1. a very small number of specialized research centers in the field of sexology...

2. only a few countries have comprehensive serological statistics...

5. sexual researches (where they exist at all- often «only touch sex problems »: they mainly focus various aspects of life associated with sexuality (AIDS, pregnancy, contraception, marriage age)than directly on sexuality itself, sexual well-being of people.

6. there is no standardization of methods of serological research, making it difficult to compare data obtained by researchers in different countries of the world;

7. there is no unified (global) terminology, for example: (a) «serological counselling»-' in some countries this term means a comprehensive psychosocial counselling and support, while in other countries «counselling» means distribution of condoms...

...it is impossible to plan international educational actions without relevant information. For example, it is pointless to develop a program of sexual education from the age of 15 in regions where the majority of young people try the first sexual relations at the age of 13. ...it was a surprisingly difficult thing to find a positive approach to human sexuality anywhere: usually they only speak about existing of negative trends (teenage abortions, children prostitution, sexual crimes and others) and how to overcome them; reduction of these negative tendencies is the only measure of success of sexual education, but we do not speak about reaching psychological and physiological harmony in sexual life by teenagers.

Judith Mackay, doctor of sexology, senior adviser of the world health Organization, from the report «Sexuality and sexual behavior in the modern world»

Unfortunately, in modern Europe there is no complex center like Institute of sexual science of Hirschfield which existed in 20-30s in Berlin. In Germany there is only a scientific-medical center is the Institute of sexology, created in Frankfurt -am Main and recently moved to Hamburg. It is very symbolic that this scientific center was included in psychiatric clinics. This fact quite eloquently testifies about the place of sexuality and sexual culture in modern European society...

Instead there is a quite respectable European Institute of gender equality on the continent, established by efforts of feminists who are obsessed by problems of equality of men and women. This establishment was opened in the capital of Lithuania Vilnius and is headed by the citizen of Sweden Lithuanian by origin. The annual budget of the Institute equaled to 7 million euros is formed by European taxpayers. In contrast to this, so generously funded institution, few European centers which are studying problems of sex, family and demography linger out their lives, as a rule, and don't even dream about such budget. For example, the Institute of sexual culture and family (ISKIS) has a zero financing from the government structures. All appeals to authorities up to the President of Russia don't not find understanding and support.

The European Institute of gender equality has been studying situations in different countries and preparing materials for the European Parliament and the EU commission. Among the most recent achievements in the field of equality between men and women we can name the formal decisions of some States to abolish the use of terms «father» and «mother», as being outdated and not meeting modern requirements. Instead of them they introduce terms of «Parent No 1» and «Parent No 2». Obviously, this is done in the interests of homosexual families. Traditional family values of «naturals» are completely ignored. It is doubtful whether such a strange policy contributes to solving acute demographic problems in Europe.

###  Pornography as a mirror of morality

The first country to legalize pornography was Denmark. But it was done step by step. In 1967 they allowed the sale of pornographic texts, a couple of years later in 1969 - pornographic images. In one of the cartoons of that period there was a joyful fat man who, with the words, «Now I won't be taken to prison for that! » is getting a pile of old pornographic magazines from the attic.

Shortly after that the police criminal experts were surprised to find out that the number of sex crimes in Denmark significantly decreased. The same effect of legalization of pornography was in Sweden, West Germany, Canada, Japan and other countries. In the United States moralists of those days Nixon and Reagan tried to prove that watching pornography promoted growth of sexual violence in the society. But the truth actually turned out to be diametrically opposite: over the last 25 years, marked with free access to pornography, the level of rapes in the United States fell by 85%.

From history

Pictures of sexual act can be seen on ancient Roman frescoes and ancient Greek vases. In those days it was perceived as erotic art and such concept as pornography simply did not exist. Sexual culture was then a part of General culture. Therefore, the same thing is indecent for our contemporaries, but was sacred for ancient Europeans.

Images of genitals were worshipped as sacred relics. In ancient Greece and Ancient Rome the main «instrument» of love was treated with great reverence. The Romans called the phallus - «fascinum» and used in many ceremonies, as a symbol of eternal divine power. Its image was attached above doors of the shops and the chariots of soldiers-winners. They even put up the sacred «fascinum» over the city gates to protect against various troubles. And there was an inscription under it «His habitam felicita» - «Happiness dwells here». In those distant times there were also common units in the form of a winged phallus. Romans piously believed in his protective power. So tiny phalluses, as amulets, were hung around children's necks. With the arrival of Christianity instead of phalluses they started to hang crosses....

Beginnings from Renaissance epoch «pornographic» engravings were wide spread. With advent of photography and cinema there appeared absolutely new opportunities for development of this sector. The first pornographic photo appeared in Europe 6 years after the invention of photography. Postcards with images of naked ladies in seductive poses were in demand among men, but were distributed illegally.

The first porn film was released in 1896, just a year after the invention of the movie camera. It was «Le Coucher de la Marie» (A cot for the bride) by a French filmmaker Eugène Piru. Only the first two minutes of the film survived to our days where the girl was just getting undressed. In the movie «El sartorio» made in Argentina in 1907, for the first time in the history sexual act was shown realistically. In the film three girls were swimming in the river, then devil came and they all had sex. «Devilish» temptation was shown there in great details.

At first technical progress helped porn business to take off. With the development of printing industry the quality of pornographic publications also increased: it became more and more colorful and attractive.

And the appearance of home video players led to an avalanche distribution of pornography. Because those dissolute movies could be only seen in special shops. Decent people preferred to avoid such «hot» places. Watching porn at home was not only more comfortable, but also much safer for your reputation.

Pornography came to our life

«We realized that if 700 million people rent XXX tapes a year, they cannot be simply a million of perverts, each of which watches 700 films. Pornography entered our life, because it found a place there»

Interview of a porn tycoon for the newspaper « New York Times», 1981

The first XXX-film for the mass audience was «A Deep throat» made by Gerard Damiano in 1972. This was a story about a responsive girl with clitoris in her throat contributed to rising interest to aural sex. It was made for six days and established an unrivalled record of profitability. The cost of the film - 25 thousand dollars - was recouped during the first week. Showing it in just one cinema in New York brought 33 thousand of dollars. For ten years the income from this film and its sequels achieved an astronomical sum of 600 million dollars! In 70-80s there were less porn films made than now, but they, as a rule, were of higher quality: there was a good art direction, some scripts and dramaturgy. When video appeared the movies became less professional and more primitive. In those times up to 20 000 films were produced annually, it means more than 50 a day (!!!). The worldwide income of all porn industry reached $ 100 billion per year. The profit from chargeable TV channels equaled to more than half a billion!

In its time, when Internet appeared, it resulted in significant growth of profit from porn industry. In recent years there has been a reverse tendency - the rapid development of technology has seriously undermined this business. Manufacturers of porn suffer from huge losses from pirate activities. If people were ready to pay big money for the «forbidden fruit», now on the Internet you can easily find free porn for every taste. Not only primitive modern clips, but also quality movies of 70-80s. As a result even this sphere is coming down. It is becoming unprofitable to produce good films. Actions of the world famous brands - American Playboy, Spanish Swedish holding «Private Media Group», a German «Beate Uhse» turned to dust. The yield of some of them has dropped by 90 percent! But now Internet sites with erotic chat rooms are flourishing, where through live web Cams you can choose a porn model to your liking and communicate to her. You can also watch a sexual act in real time.

Pornography from the point of view of official morality is considered to be something shameful and embarrassing. However, it helps not only society as a whole, significantly reducing the level of sexual violence, but also particular couples. After all, porno materials not only excite, but visually teach various techniques of sex. And where can people see it all? There are many courses that are taught to dance beautifully, but beautiful sex, so far, unfortunately, is not taught anywhere else.

Women are also interested in it

For a long time it was believed that women don't watch porn films. But recent studies in Russia have refuted this myth. As it found out more than 44 percent of all requests with the word «erotic» are done by women. However, in requests with the word «porn» proportion of women is smaller - about 40 percent. That is, the proportion of women among consumers is not as small. Although men, of course, are attracted by porn much more often. According to various studies in the Western countries «sexually explicit material» is consumed by from 86 to 98 percent of men and 66 to 85% of women. 57 per cent of women watch porn together with their partners. One third of them regularly use it as a prelude to sex.

In conditions of an acute shortage of serious in-depth studies of intimate sphere, pornography can be viewed as a mirror of genuine morals uncovered by hypocritical morality. History of pornography can easily show us how sexual tastes and preferences of Europeans have been changing over the last hundred years. Old photos and films, in contrast to the modern, show oral and anal sex extremely rarely. What was considered to be an exotic form of sexual contacts in the past now became a «standard» set of almost any porn film.

We must understand that porn industry, thanks to the Internet, easily tracks and is very responsive to every demand of consumers. Therefore, pornographic content reflects tastes and customs of the modern society fairly accurately. But there we can see very disturbing trends as well. The victory of feminism as a result of sexual revolution was reflected in pornography. The emancipation of women goes sometimes beyond the limit. And it is demonstrated quite clearly.

On porn websites under rubric «Strap-on», you can see ladies with attached artificial Dildos, who have sex with other women, acting as men. Technology has moved so far that the latest novelties of the porn industry even simulate emission of semen. But even that was not enough for some ultra-feminists. They are not satisfied with the role of a man with other women and they want men to act as a woman in a sexual act. In modern pornography we can see even these things. This is a manifestation of unprecedented changes in sexual history of mankind arising as a result of female emancipation and simultaneous male degradation. Such a triumph of gender equality!
Chapter 8.

###  Thirst for love and sexual hunger

The phenomenon of love * Love and sex * Sex and health * Sexual discrimination of the youth * Non-traditional relationships * Is prostitution immortal? * The era of masturbation

###  The phenomenon of love

«Love knows no age» - wrote the famous Russian poet Alexander Pushkin. But even for those who are madly in love it is painfully difficult to declare it. Many people are not able to do it and are often confused in choosing the right words. This situation is often shown in romantic novels and films. Now it is not as relevant as it used to be, not because most people have learned to say beautiful words to speak about their love, but rather because everybody has completely forgotten HOW to do that. Beautiful love letters which our grandfathers and great grandfathers used to write to our grandmothers and great grandmothers now are not written by anybody. The main trend of our time - maximum simplification: not only of architecture and service, but also of relationships.

Nevertheless, modern people are longing for love not less than a hundred or two hundred years ago. But somehow they are horribly embarrassed to explain this. However nobody is embarrassed to speak using filthy curses. Surprisingly, but for every word of love spoken in the world, there are hundreds, and perhaps thousands of insulting words. Why is it like that? Where does this greatest paradox come from? We dream about one thing, but often do something diametrically opposite. Everyone wants love, but not insults. Now regarding vile profanity women do not assign men. Thank insane emancipation!

If in previous centuries they invented an air kiss, which is hardly used nowadays, our time was marked by proliferation of offensive gesture with a raised middle finger. The verbal equivalent of this gesture is a dirty word «Fuck you! » And this is very symbolic for our epoch of self-centeredness and self-admiration. Many of people, who want to be loved, have forgotten how to love others. This problem was deeply researched by Erich Fromm - one of the greatest psychologists of the twentieth century, the Creator of «humanist of psychoanalysis», one of the founders of neofreudianism.

Ability to love

«...It is considered that amorousness is already the top of love, while in fact it is only the beginning and only a possibility of finding love. It is considered that love is the result of a mysterious attraction of two people to each other, and it is something that happens by itself. Yes, loneliness and sexual desire make love easy to get, and there's nothing mysterious, but it is the success that quickly comes, and quickly goes away. You can't be loved by an accident, your own ability to love causes love just as interest makes a person interested. People are concerned about the question if they are attractive, but they tend to forget that the essence of appeal is in their own ability to love».

Erich Fromm, the «Man for himself»

It is interesting that one of the chapters of the book by E. Fromm «The Art of love» was called «Love and its disintegration in modern society». Later, in another book, he noted that in the society of consumption «people with a market nature can neither love nor hate. These «old-fashioned» emotions do not correspond to the structure of nature, functioning almost entirely on the rational level and avoiding any feelings...». In spite of such gloomy conclusions, we must admit that in all times and in all circumstances, most people still want to love and be loved.

But what is love? Scientists have tried to «dissect» this magical feeling, and to reveal its biochemical nature. It found out that the brain of lovers excretes substances acting as drugs. They produce euphoria and bliss, but in the case of an overabundance they provide a «mad passion». However, after two or three years the output of stimulating substances is decreasing and the phase of love is over. For someone it's really all over. But if a person has the «power to love», which was mentioned by Erich Fromm, this sense enters the stage of attachment.

Helen Fisher, a Professor of anthropology at the American University of Rutgers has been engaged in research of love for over 35 years! She has travelled around the world, studying marriage and sexual experience of different cultures and peoples. On the basis of the collected material she has published five books, the latest of which was published in 2004 and was called «Why do we love: the nature and chemistry of romantic love». Helen Fisher has tried to somehow systematize the subject of study and has identified three main forms of love. The first form is attraction. Sex instinct makes us search for partners. «You might want to have sex with anyone, just driving the car» explains the anthropologist. It should be noted that this form of love is known from time immemorial. The famous French writer of the 19th century Frederick Stendahl in his «Treatise on love» called it «physical love»

Physical love

«To waylay a beautiful and fresh peasant woman on the hunt, who is running away to the forest? Everyone is familiar with such love based on pleasures of this kind; no matter how dry and miserable the nature of a man is, at the age of sixteen he begins with this».

Frederick Stendahl, «The Treatise on love»

The second form, according to systematization of Helen Fisher is a romantic love. It focuses on one specific person, who you cannot imagine your life without. This crazy love affects sometimes stronger than cocaine, but usually lasts for not more than three years. American anthropologist concluded that romantic love is the main engine of a reproduction instinct, as it allows to choose the most suitable partner.

The third form of love is an affection which forces us to stay with a particular partner as long as we need to wait until the child grows up. According to Helen Fisher calm love in marriage lasts, as a rule, not more than ten years. But this is only an average figure. Everything depends on people. It happens that a deep sense of affection between spouses lasts for the whole life, though in modern world there are fewer and fewer of such examples, unfortunately.

As the American scientist found out, these three forms can be present in every person's life not only consistently one after another, but at the same time with different partners.

We are able to love several people

«Now you are lying in bed with someone who is very dear to you, who you are very fond of, but feel no attraction. At the same time you can be madly in love with someone else and not to object to have sex with someone the third.

...You can feel deep attachment for a long-term partner, while you feel intense romantic love for somebody else, while you covet people beyond these two relationships. In short, we are able to love several people at once. »

Helen Fisher, from a speech during a lecture

This discovery made by the American anthropologist contradicts the traditional views about love, but it is nevertheless true. And this can be confirmed by millions of men and women around the world who have seen this in their own experience.

###  Love and sex

According to hypocritical morality imposed to modern society, love is something light, divine and lofty, but sex is something diametrically opposite: dirty, indecent, and even devil. Religious people say: «She has sinned » meaning that she had sex. However, less religious part of society perfectly combines these two concepts, widely using the expression «make love» as a more harmonious and «decent» equivalent of expression «sex». That is, in our everyday life love is often not contrasted to sex, the more so, it even becomes a synonym of love. To avoid further confusion, for simplicity and clarity we will look at analogy with food and drink. Assume that sex is a good roast or steak, love is red wine. Of course, it is much more pleasant and useful to eat meat, drinking wine. This usually happens during big romantic love.

However, it is obvious that meat and wine can be used separately. The same thing often happens in life: love without sex, or sex without love. Moreover, we can courageously say that a large portion of meat is eaten by mankind dry without wine. Millions of people have sex not because they have a big romantic love, but just because of sexual instinct, that was called «attraction» by Helen Fisher, and «physical love » by Frederick Stendhal. »

«Physical love» is still better than nothing at all. And sex even without love is more preferable than sexual starvation. By the way, this phenomenon is very little studied. Although it is obvious that among Europeans there are much more sexually hungry people than among Africans. People deprived of sex are widely represented in many sectors of society. –

Young men suffer from sexual starvation most of all. They reach sexual maturity at the age of 12 and even earlier. Researchers from max-Planck-Institute say that today boys become mature earlier than ever before. German scientists have calculated that for half a century puberty is accelerated by approximately one year, it means that grandchildren have sexual need on average a year earlier than their grandfathers and great-grandfathers.

According to scientists, men have a peak of sexual desires at the age of 15-18, that is precisely when most of them do not have any possibilities to have a normal sexual life. Besides, official and especially Church morality instructs them to have complete sexual abstinence before marriage. Masturbation is also deprecated. Few can follow all these draconian regulations. As a result, young men often have nervous disorders and psychological breakdowns. Criminologists point out extraordinary violence of juvenile crimes, which sexologists and psychologists explain by artificial blockade of the basic instinct. It was proved that prolonged sexual abstinence activates aggressiveness. So it turns out that our youth become brutalized not from sex, but rather from its absence!

Hypocritical requirements of morality

«To allow a boy to get married legally in the evening of the day, when he is 16 years old, thus showing that in this case sexual life is not harmful any more, and simultaneously demand «asceticism until marriage», even if it can happen only at the age of 30 for some economic reasons - is so hypocritical. So «sexual act at an early age» is turned into something «harmful or immoral'. It is impossible to agree with, just as to put up with neurosis and perversions generated by this approach...».

Wilhelm Reich «Sexual revolution»

So, the first group of sexually hungry people consists of mostly young men. Women suffer from sexual starvation in the youth much less, since their peak of sexual lusts starts only at the age of 35-40.

The second group of sexually hungry people consists of lonely people. According to sociologists, in Europe more than 40 percent of adults have neither husband nor even a permanent partner. There are more than 50 % of such people in Russia! Many of them live without sex for years. Women suffer from it most of all, who often have to starve sexually in the period of highest sexual desire.

The third group of sexually hungry is spouses. Usually in the first months of marriage the couple enjoys passionate sex, and often simply does not get out of bed. However, then there are fewer and fewer sexual contacts. Eventually the couple becomes cold to each other. Interest in sex of spouses after marriage is reduced by approximately three times. If before marriage more than 40 percent of couples have sex every day, after getting married this figure decreases to 6 percent. There are couples who live on the brink of sexual hunger as their sexuality is disappearing. They have sex only a few times a year. It turns out almost like in the joke when a man during the survey says: «our family has no problems with sex - we have it every year. » For many couples sex turns into a boring routine and monotonous implementation of marital responsibilities. In such a situation, people often start to look for joy on the side. Others keep the prescribed morality, having no sex at all.

A family without sex

«Recently my husband spoke to his friend of the same age - so he is married and hasn't had sex with his wife for 8 years. I was just horrified. And there are a lot of such unhappy families. People do not know how to love themselves and are linked to materialism, but spiritual freedom and spiritual love for them is blocked. It's a pity! Write about it in the book - I beg you! Let people learn to respect and love themselves. After all, all diseases and depressions are from this.

Letter to the author from Tatiana from Holland

This couple, which hasn't had sex for 8 years can still seem quite happy from the point of view of people around them, their bed is not controlled by anybody. Perhaps the married couple had problems in sexual life, and they preferred to give it up instead of asking a sexologist for help. So this is the reason for a hidden form of sexual starvation. But there is also an openly declared form. Now in America and in Europe more than five million of asexual people voluntarily give up their sexual life. The movement «sexless » is becoming more and more popular when wives deliberately refuse to have sex with their husbands for years. However, in terms of negative impacts on health, openly declared sexual starvation has no difference from the hidden one.

###  Sex and health

In favor of hypocritical morality some psychologists and sexologists are trying to prove usefulness of sexual abstinence. Especially for the youth. It, allegedly, does not do any harm to the body, is accepted painlessly and has no effect on sexual function. But early sexual life, as it turns out, has «a perishing effects on emotional-mental sphere and is injurious for health». Besides, it «contributes to development of frigidity of women, as well as threatening of venereal diseases and unwanted pregnancies». On one hand, it is true that a woman, who is never engaged in sex, will never have neither frigidity, nor pregnancy, and no sexually transmitted diseases. But, on the other hand, our life is really a very dangerous thing. And not only when we are young. However, according to opinions of many people, existence without sex is not life but vegetation.

Thrown off by archaism

«In modern scientific sexology position of absolute harmlessness and even usefulness of sexual abstinence for men is thrown off as an archaism. The vast majority of the most authoritative sexologists believe that there is no impassable verge between sexual activity and other kinds of vital manifestations, and general patterns, characteristic for basic physiological phenomenon, can be applicable for sexual physiology as well, representing only a particular case of general regularities»

George Vasilchenko, Professor, the founder of Soviet sexology

So, in the opinion of authoritative scientists sexual abstinence is not fruitful at all. It affects the body not in the best way. But a sexual life of full value, on the contrary, is very useful for health. These are scientifically proven facts in support of sex:

1. Sex greatly reduces the risk of serious cardiovascular diseases. It is established that sexual acts three times a week or more often reduces the risk of heart attack and stroke by two times.

2. Sex increases testosterone production, which contributes to strengthening of bones and muscles and reduces the level of cholesterol in blood and leads to normal blood pressure.

3. According to studies performed at the American University in Wilkes (Wilkes University) the more often people have sex; the more antibodies they have, and they increase immunity status. Sex activates the immune system, which works more actively at night. Therefore, doctors recommend an evening sex before bedtime.

4. Sex improves appearance. It helps to get rid of acnes and smooths wrinkles. It is proved by doctors: if a woman has sex regularly, she has much less wrinkles and she looks 5-10 years younger than her age.

5. Sex stimulates work of brain, in particular pituitary and pineal gland. With regular sexual acts hormones are released in the body to stimulate the brain. Professor of the Hamburg Institute of sexology Werner Habermel notes: «Sex increases our ability to focus attention and stimulates creative thinking».

6. Sex increases life expectancy and slows the aging process. It was established by the scientists from Scotland based on a survey of more than three thousand people at the age from 18 to 102. People who have sex three times a week and more often look 10 years younger than their peers. It turned out that sexual activity affects life expectancy considerably more than even material situation of the person.

7. People who are sexually active get cancer less. This disease chooses «sexually lazy» people more often, as it is said by doctor of biological Sciences, the leading researcher of the Russian Academy of Sciences Vigen Geodakyan.

Male hormones protect women against cancer

Since the 30s of the 20th century cancer is treated by hormones of opposite sex. According to statistics, in the 70s in Central Asia there were fewer diseases of breast cancer by10 times than in European countries. This can only be explained by the fact that in Asian regions condoms were used less! Condoms prevent transmission of sex hormones that protect women from cancer.

Vigen Geodakyan, Russian scientist

According to American scientists 70 per cent of women and 25 per cent of men have sharply reduced ability to work if they have sexual problems. It becomes the cause of 60 to 100 percent of nervous break downs. As we can see from studies of SHOW (Sexual Health and Overall Wellness) , which were initiated by Pfizer, only 42 percent of men and 36 per cent of women are completely satisfied with their sexual lives. It means that more than half of men are unsatisfied, as well as two-thirds of women. This data was obtained in 2010 as a result of the survey in ten countries: Russia, Ukraine, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Turkey and Israel. It is interesting that 67 percent of men and 55 percent of women stated that sex for them is essential and very important. In the countries of Western and Northern Europe the situation of sexual well-being is not much better.

###  Sexual discrimination of the youth

It happened in a small town in Northern Russia. Four 9-year-old schoolchildren undressed their classmate and simulated a sex act. So they decided to «play sex».

A similar situation happened in the UK. But that game did not stop there. In the end, two boys 10 and 11 years old were accused of raping an 8-year-old girl, who they dragged into the bushes by threats. However, at the court in London the girl admitted that there was no violence and all that was really interesting and fun.» It turned out that she and the boys voluntarily got undressed. But when her mother saw what was happening in the bush, daughter became very frightened and lied about the rape.

In American state Ohio an 11-year-old girl was accused of mass rape of two boys and one girl of an early age.

In Israel a 10-year-old girl during the year had sex with seventeen (!!!) boys in total of the same age from the same school, where she studied. The chairman of the parent Committee could not understand «how children at this age could do what they did».

Of course, these are exceptional cases, but they nevertheless confirm that children's sexuality is not a myth, but a reality. Scientists spoke about it for over a hundred years ago. For the first time children's sexuality was described by Sigmund Freud in his work «Three essays on the theory of sexuality» in 1905. According to Freud children already are becoming interested in their sexual organs from the age of three. In our time this phenomenon is met by many parents and teachers. In any kindergarten you will be told several stories about masturbation by 4-5 year old children.

Masturbation of teenagers is the most widespread. Almost all young men and a lot of girls practice it. And men's peak of masturbation almost coincides with the peak of sexual desire at the age of 14-17. Widespread of masturbation among boys is explained by the fact that modern society imposes abstinence at the most inopportune moment from the point of view of physiology and puts «social maturity» above sexual.

But it was not always like that. In the period of antiquity and even in the dark middle ages natural sexuality was not limited and not suppressed by law as it is practiced in today's «humane» times. People started normal sexual life much earlier and practically coincided with puberty. Human nature did not enter into conflict with morals and laws, as it is happening in our time.

Historical review

«With all diversity of peoples and cultures (Westermar _с_ k, 1922), almost everywhere the suitable age for beginning sexual life was considered the age of puberty, which was determined by obvious external signs. In most ethnic communities this age ranged between 12 and 14 ...»

« In Rome during the period of Republic, which left us more legislative material, marriage age for girls was set at 12 years for boys - 14».

«According to Canon law, marriage age was defined according to individual biological maturity (presence of menstruation or ejaculation), and only in 1563, at Trent ecumenical council of Catholic Church, they fixed calendar age: 12 years for girls and 14 for boys».

«Although Shakespeare chose Italian Verona as the place for actions of his play «Romeo and Juliet», the age of 13-year-old Juliet seemed to reflect the reality of modern England for him. A 26-year-old mother of Juliet even blamed his daughter that she was almost an old maid. Shakespeare didn't specify the age of Romeo, but told the story of a Church blessing of his marriage to Juliet without the consent of her parents, because Juliet was already old enough for marriage».

Verne Leroy Bullo, Professor of California University, «The Age of consent: a historical overview»

Confirmation of early start of sexual life in the past century can be found in works of classics of Russian literature.

Groom at the age of 12

« -How did you get married, Nanny?

So, evidently, God commanded. My Vanya was even younger than me, my dear. And I was only thirteen. For two weeks a matchmaker went to my relatives, and finally my father blessed me. »

A.S. Pushkin «Eugene Onegin»

In our time puberty of boys and girls comes earlier than it was with their peers in the past century. Now a 14-year-old girl sometimes looks just like her grandmother at 20. However, some strict legislators, who forgot about their youth agony, do not take it into account. They do not go towards the nature, but against it, rising the age of marriage and the age of sexual consent (legal sexual relations) higher and higher.

For example, in Canada from 1890 until 2008 there was a law according to which the age of consent was 14 years old. From May the 1st 2008 it was raised to 16 years. According to the Russian laws of the end of the 19th century, the age of consent was set at 14 years. In our time, it was raised to 16 years. Someone thought that this was not enough. Some Russian lawmakers tried to raise it to 18 years, looking at, perhaps, the United States, where this age of sexual consent is set in many States. Even the most liberal in Europe law , which was in force in Spain and specified the age of consent at 12 years, it was changed in 1999 upward to 13 years.

Often such strictness is tried to be explained by struggle against pedophilia. This topic in recent years is artificially inflated to unprecedented proportions. However, for nasty maniacs, raping five-year old babies, rising of the age of consent absolutely changes nothing. But it makes it possible to declare a normal love-struck young man to be a pedophile and put him in prison for several years. The famous Russian oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky, who was in prison for quite a long time, met one of such poor fellows. The former head of Oil Company YUKOS, told about the fate of a young man, who was turned into a«pedophile» by our «humane system». The 18-year-old boy fell in love with a girl a few years younger than he. Lovers decided to live together and waited for the time when the law allows them to get married. But in spite of all assurances of the young «bride» and certificate of the family, the guy was accused of abuse of juvenile and sentenced to six years.

A similar story happened to another couple in love, in the Ukrainian town of Kherson. He was 21 and she was 13. The guy was facing up to 6 years of prison, and he begged: «give me my Natasha back, if you are people! Understand, I really fell in love! Nobody will make me leave her! She wants to have a child from me ».

10 years of prison for love

In the US a 20-year-old resident of Arkansas Franklin Moore (Franklin D. Moore) was sentenced to 10 years in prison after the performance in a TV talk show devoted to the problem of early marriages and pregnancies. He came there with his 13-year-old girl friend who was already expecting a child.

After only a few weeks the guy was behind bars. A jury found him guilty of rape, and as the evidence they used a video of the talk show. The lawyers of the defendant insisted that sex between him and his girlfriend was by mutual consent and asked to consider, that in case of conviction, the soon born child will be without a father. However, the jurors were relentless and the verdict was reached for 15 minutes. Now, Franklin Moore would stay in jail for the next 10 years.

According to the laws of the state Arkansas, an accused person is considered to be guilty of rape if his partner is less than 14 years, and the age difference exceeds two years. The difference 20 and even 30 years doesn't really confuse anybody and there is nothing to be scared of if the groom is not 20, but 50. But isn't this state a sexual discrimination of the youth? Obviously, the higher the lawmakers raise the age of consent, the more «paedophiles» are there and the more people can be frightened by terrible figures. Say, if we rise the age of consent from 16 to 25 years, the result will be a crazy nightmare.

A famous Russian writer Viktor Pelevin in his fantastic book «S.N.U.F.F.» describes a marasmic society, where the age of consent was increased to 46 years. It is clear that quick degeneration is guaranteed for such anti-sexual country. It is also obvious that such bans are not a protection of young people from « defilement », but a frank mockery of it. Following the same logic we can declare sex after 50 illegal under the pretext of "morality and health care» of elderly people.

Pornographic video about sex of young boys with mature women are very popular on the internet. Porn sites, certainly taking the tasted and preferences of visitors into account, present such materials as «sex with a teacher» or «sex with mom of a school friend». Most often such porn is made in America, and it is certainly a reflection of real life. At all times, young men are willing to have sex with mature women because their peaks of sexual desires coincide. That means that such an amazing unequal love is understandable from a physiological point of view. However, in many quite civilized countries it is considered to be criminal. In the USA there was a case when the teacher was jailed for love with her pupil. After being in prison for 8 years, she married him, gave birth to children and even wrote a book about her misadventures.

In freedom-loving and such a humane America, Europe tries to be equal to it, they give a longer prison sentence for the «wrong» love than for a murder. In Florida, a 43-year-old Denise Harvey was sentenced to 30 years (!!!) of imprisonment for starting a sexual relationship with a 16-year old friend of her son. Together with her family she escaped to Canada where the age of sexual consent is set at 16 instead of 18 as in Florida. That is, if it all happened in Canada or in Spain, nothing would threaten to her. In a town where Denise Harvey lived, many people sympathized this nice slender woman. Two thousand of inhabitants from eighteen thousand signed a petition in her defense.

It is obvious that physiology as well as physics do not obey legislators, no matter how they would like it. Therefore, sexual development of an average American does not differ from sexual development of an average Spaniard. Regarding this, the 5-year age difference of consent looks, to put it mildly, absurd. Here the question arises: do we have a sane world, or a planet of idiots?

Genius Shakespeare could hardly assume that there would be times when his Romeo can be easily put in prison for «sexual abuse of underage» Juliet. Surprisingly, but the initiator of sexual discrimination of the youth and unprecedented in the past century prosecutions for love were structures of the UN and the European Commission, which were under control of the militant feminists. Many scientists and experts «rebelled» and expressed their opposition to «a wide-scale criminalization of adolescent sexuality». Perhaps influential feminists and their henpecked males were guided by good intentions, but the result turned to be complete absurdity.

A 17-year old child - an absurdity of the century

«Not long time ago there was no language in the world which used the word «child» speaking about anyone over the age of early adolescence. UN Convention on the rights of the child of 1989 became the first legal document, which set back all the differences between children and adolescents and declared that children are people under the age of 18.

... _Commission of the European Union transfers this concept in the sphere of criminal law, offering in December 2000, a draft Framework decision on combating sexual exploitation of children and child pornography. In this project the European Commission does not make the slightest difference between different age groups of minors, children on the one hand, and adolescents, on the other. From its point of view, young people aged 17 and a half does not differ from a five-year child._

... The European Parliament approved the Commission's proposal by vast majority of 446 votes against 16.

... If the bill of the European Commission passed unchanged, in each state- member of the EU a fifteen-year-old schoolboy would receive up to 4 years in prison (at least) if he took a photograph of his girlfriend of the same age in a bikini, which revealed her «pubic region, and if the girlfriend looked sexy (in the language of the bill, « lustfully»). The same would threaten a 14 year old boy who secretly drew a naked young beauty in a « lustful» pose.

This project caused a storm of criticism among experts ... the German society of sexological research even gave the definition of «child pornography, copied word for word from the Federal code of the United States, «moral colonialism». The framework Convention in the end was slightly softened.

The mentioned above hypothetical 14-year old teenager can now (if the state allows it ) draw a naked young beauty in «lustful» pose, however, he will still be the subject to criminal prosecution and severe penalties for «providing access to child pornography», if he shows the picture, for example, to a friend.

... It all looks as complete absurd. The same as proclamation of a 17-year-old «children» or «criminals» those who keep erotic («lustful») image of physically mature young men and women aged 17 and a half .

The absurd was completed by the fact that the EU Council of Ministers included in the Framework decision a point forbidding members- States to put the prosecution dependent on complaints or statements from victims or their legal representatives».

Helmut Graupner, doctor of law, Vice-President of the Austrian sexological society, from the book «the 17-year-old child: the absurdity of the late 20th century »

It turns out that the new inquisitors force to send people to jail, even when there are neither complaints nor victims. They do not care about crippled destinies of young lovers, as well as about children left without fathers. Love that does not fit the established unnatural age range is declared outlaw. However, even the most terrible threats and incredibly harsh sentences do not give expected results. Moralists are unable to resist human nature. With acceleration of physiological maturation the average age of first sexual experience is steadily decreasing. In the United States from the 1950s to the 1980s approvals of girls of premarital sex rose from 12 to 73 percent. The proportion of boys, approving premarital sex rose from 40 to 79 percent. The age of first sexual contact for girls fell from 19 to 15 years. Polls in Europe show similar results.

A Billion thrown on wind

For ten years (1996-2006) the U.S. Federal government has spent more than a billion dollars on school-based programs of sexual abstinence. However, a study conducted by the U.S. Congress, showed that the pupils participating in such programs have sex with not less desire than other teenagers. Moreover, the average age of loss of virginity of 2057 interviewed students is exactly the same as the average in the USA- 14.9 years.

«If the average age of puberty is 12 years, but the average age of marriage is 26 years, and almost 80 percent of young people approve premarital sex, then we need to end political fantasies about the education of abstinence-based and adapt to reality»

James Wagoner, the President of the civil society group «In defense of the youth»

Quite ineffective were not only the program of abstinence, but draconian laws against pornography as well. The Internet is now simply swamped by tsunami of primitive low quality videos and «live» cameras. It becomes apparent that it is not enough to take legal prohibitions to solve problems. It is necessary to develop sexual culture comprehensively, to revise all norms radically and elaboration of unified civilized standards regarding physiological development of the youth, opinions of scientists and experts, as well as historical experience of mankind.

###  Non-traditional relationships

Non-traditional sexual relationships have existed in all times, but they have never been cultivated and sublimated in the history of mankind as in our days. Even in Ancient Greece, where sexual relations between adult men and boys were regarded as perhaps the highest form of love, there were no gay parades, no official homosexual marriages. Because even in that, terribly depraved to present representations society, sexual orientation was mainly manifested in bisexual relationships. However, respect for the traditional family remained and the importance of procreation was understood.

Non-traditional female and male sexuality cannot be viewed only through black-and-white or more precisely pink-and-blue glasses. According to research by Alfred Kinsey, there are many shades, for which American scientist suggested a seven-grade scale. So clearly expressed gays and lesbians are just the most extreme position and are represented by a very small minority. There are much more bisexual people in the middle of the scale, but they generally do not advertise their non-traditional tendency.

Among bisexuals there was the founder of the Roman Empire, the famous military leader and the writer Gaius Julius Caesar. Describing his amazing desire of love, contemporaries called him «a husband of all his wives and a wife of all husbands». A writer, a historian scientist and encyclopedist Gaius Suetonius Tranquille wrote about this «shameful glory» of great Caesar's in his book «Life of twelve Caesars ». Homosexual relations in those times were not approved by the state, but they were not prosecuted as well. It became a cause for ridicules, but not for executions.

However, with appearance of Christianity in Ancient Rome they adopted laws against sodomy and men «playing the role of women» were sentenced to public burning. Such laws existed during the middle Ages. During the Renaissance prohibitions formally continued to function, but «sodomy» flourished not only among the elite, but even in the Vatican...

Legalization of homosexual relationships

The first big country which abolished criminal prosecution for gay sex was France. It happened in 1791, soon after the victory of the great French revolution and the Declaration of the rights of a man and a citizen». In Belgium, a non-traditional sexual orientation was legalized in 1795, in the Netherlands in 1811, in Italy in 1890, at the Vatican in 1929, in Poland in 1932, Denmark in 1933, in Sweden in 1944, in England, in 1967, in Germany in 1968. In most other European countries – in 70 – 90-s.

In Russia prosecution for homosexual relations were introduced only by Peter the Great and cancelled only by Bolsheviks in the frames of the first sexual revolution. Later, under Stalin, people were jailed for a non-traditional sexual orientation again. Such laws were in force until 1993.

In the USA legalization of homosexual relations started in 1961 and ended only in 2003, when the Supreme Court canceled the criminal prosecution of homosexuals in the last 13 States.

Now structures of UN and the Council of Europe actively protect rights of gays. In 2011, the UN Human Rights Council adopted resolution «Human Rights, sexual orientation and gender identity» for the first time in history, which prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation. However, in 76 countries of the world there is a criminal prosecution for homosexual relations, and in 5 Muslim countries it is punishable by death.

At the same time, in some Christian countries they started to register homosexual marriages officially. Even in the Church! Church Weddings for homosexual couples have become available in Sweden from November 1, 2009. The Lutheran Protestant Church of Sweden takes part in gay-parades in Stockholm under the slogan «Love is stronger than everything». In 2002, the Swedish Parliament was the first in the world to legalize the right of gay couples to adopt children. Now homosexual families are allowed to do it in other countries as well. However, sometimes it leads to great scandals.

Will a boy become a girl?

A family of two lesbians from California, who adopted a boy eight years ago, decided to turn him into a girl and prepares his stepson to sex change surgery. The child was already crammed with hormonal drugs. The «moms» assured that the 11-year-old Tommy was a boy on the outside only. He, allegedly, really liked wearing dresses. When he was 8 years old the boy was offered to choose his clothes, he chose only women ones, including bra. The intention of lesbians to make a girl out of a boy caused a scandal, which again brought supporters and opponents of adoption of children by homosexual families to barricades.

Gender madness in Sweden

In one of the new kindergartens in Sweden they «cancelled» boys and girls. Now, instead of «he» or «she» they use a word of jargon of gays, which does not exist in a classic Swedish language. The children here don't read fairy tales «Snow white» and «Thumbelina», because they are «filled with traditional gender stereotypes. » Instead, kids are acquainted with the story of two male giraffes who worried a lot that they couldn't have children, but, fortunately, found an abandoned crocodile egg. Almost all the books in this kindergarten tell about homosexual couples, single parents and orphans.

The destruction of established views about roles of men and women in society is the main objective of the national program of pre-school education. In many kindergartens they have introduced special «gender teachers, who help educators to identify « dissidents» among children, adhering to old stereotypes. Some Swedish parents are very concerned about such trends and actively oppose «gender madness».

A hundred years ago representatives of non-traditional sexual orientation started the struggle for their rights, demanding cancellation of criminal prosecution. Once completed, they went further. Now it is not clear where they will stop...

Many Europeans don't like the excessive aggressiveness of sexual minorities, although in the West few dare to admit it. However, it would be unfair to blame only gays and lesbians in cultivation and the rise of homosexual relationships. It's a paradox, but most of «naturals» contributes to this, creating countless barriers between the traditional relationships between men and women.

According to scientists homosexuality can be natural and situational. It may be present in him from birth, or occur because of some life circumstances. Say, it is known that homosexual relationships often arise in the army, prisons and even monasteries, where men and women are deprived of communication with the opposite sex and have strong sexual hunger. However, some people have to accept forms only for physiological discharge, but they do not lose interest of the opposite sex, so they are bisexual, not homosexuals.

Age limits and many other artificial barriers to traditional sexual relations are especially dangerous for young men at the age of sexual lust peak. Sexual hunger often pushes them to homosexual contacts. In our time there even such a thing as an « adolescent homosexuality».

The development of homosexual relationships instead of traditional is contributed by absence of sexual culture in the broad understanding in European society. Few people are acquainted with the art of love, which is chanted in many countries of the East. As a result, even in «sexually educated » Netherlands and Sweden, many men are not able to get acquainted with women and love them. In sex, they avoid preludes with kisses and touches, stroking the hair, shoulders and face. One woman from Netherlands who has seen a lot and changed several husbands described sexual behavior of men like that: «All their petting is to pat roughly on my back or on haunch. They can't and don't want to speak affectionate words, tender verses and phrases (as women love with their ears) because they are afraid to be laughed at by these insolent feminists» .

Why do women become lesbians?

American sexologists found out that failures of traditional relationships with men provoke many women to become lesbians. According to scientists from medical University in New Orleans, women prefer homosexual love to traditional relations due to failures with men. Exactly this reason was called by 72% of women interviewed during the course of the study. 1500 women who changed their orientation aged from 18 to 43 years took part in the survey. Many of them tried to create a family with men for a few years, but failed. According to the leader of the study sexologist Worlds Vertuchi, the main reason for change of orientation is not only a lack of understanding with the opposite sex, but also unwillingness of women to solve their problems.

Many men have similar difficulties. But in addition to inability to get acquainted with women, there are also strict legal limitations. In the USA, for example, it is enough to glance back at a woman from head to toe, or tell her a compliment and you will be charged with «sexual harassment».

If a hundred years ago well-mannered gentlemen cared for ladies, told them compliments, gave them hands, opened the door to them and let them go ahead, now such actions may be considered as harassment, violation of equality and humiliation. In the times of «Titanic», thank God, the situation was different, so 80 percent of men died there, giving seats in lifeboats to women. Probably, from the point of view of modern feminists, they allowed these terrible «inequality» and «humiliation» of the weaker sex to happen.

In our days the attempt to get acquainted with a pleasant lady can be very costly. In the USA the total amount of compensation in cases of harassment reaches a billion dollars a year! Love Affairs at work are especially dangerous for directors. Due to efforts of such militant feminists the former President of Israel was sentenced to seven years in prison for such pranks and is already serving the sentence. Taking his advanced age into account, he may never see freedom again.

A man is always guilty

«Men unfairly accused of rape receive the deserved lesson anyway. »

Katarin Komins, feminist

« Any sex, even mutually desired between married couples, is an act of violence of men over women».

Katarina Mac-Kinon, professor of law, feminist

In some countries, even a husband might be accused of harassment to his own wife. For example, in Sweden a woman has a full right to contact the police when her husband often requires sex at night. If sexually hungry Swede, jacked by his own wife, will use the services of prostitutes, he risks to be found behind bars. It is interesting that the prostitute herself is not going to be punished.

Sweden is a country of victorious feminism, where life is not so sweet for the stronger sex. It is a paradox, but it is much easier and legally safer to be engaged in non-traditional sex than traditional. The world-known journalist and founder of the international Internet project WikiLeaks Julian Floor Assange was accused in the «rape» in Sweden only for the fact that during voluntary sex with sexually mature girl he didn't use a condom.

Creating sometimes unimaginable obstacles for traditional sexual life, authorities of many countries of the West show surprisingly touching concern for homosexuals. Initially in the USA and then in Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, Britain and several other countries they began to conduct an annual national day of coming out». This name comes from the English expression «coming out of the closet» - but literally it means «coming out of the shadows». On this day young people can openly declare their non-traditional orientation to «happy» parents, friends and the society. Such a celebration of homosexual love and democracy.

As for naturals, who are beyond natural age range, such «coming out» ends in prison. It happened to Franklin Moore from Arkansas, who together with his pregnant girlfriend «came out of the shadows» on the television talk show, and then went to prison for 10 years . We have already spoken about him earlier in this Chapter.

Gay parades have become the most striking manifestation of unprecedented exaltation of non-traditional sexual relations. They are annually held in many cities of Europe. The people of traditional orientation don't do anything like that. Although in the time of Ancient Rome everything was just the opposite. Then there weren't any gay parades, but there were parades in honor of the holiday of love Goddess Venus, during which they carried a huge phallus on one chariot, and a huge vagina on the other. Here's how it happened:

A holiday of love

«It was already crowded near the temple of Venus Eritsinskaya. At the command of centurion a chain of guards moved the crowd apart and formed a passage for passing by chariots. Brass helmets and plates on belts of warriors were glimmering in the sun like lights and created the effect of festive illuminations. Chariots with a phallus and vagina were sliding down the sparkling corridor to the temple of Venus, where they were waited by the priests in order to hold the main ceremony of the festival. The Sacred Phallus and Sinus Veneris were removed from the chariot and put in the center, in a visible place. The senior priest of the temple of Venus read the prayer in praise of love, joy of life and fertility. After a choir performance of dithyrambs in honor of the Goddess of Love, the most respected matrons in Rome, mothers of large families, picked up the huge phallus on their shoulders...»

«... under excitable roar of the crowd matrons put the Sacred Phallus into the womb of vagina of Sinus Veneris. It looked as if they were imitating coitus of gods. Then there were sounds of flute and boys decorated with goat's horns and tails started dancing erotic dance Kordak. Charming maenads began to join then - Servants of the cult of Venus. Some were waving small stone or leather phalluses.

This intoxicating group dance was an integral part of a religious cult of the Goddess of Love».

Arseniy Sobolevsky, from the book «TAIS»

The feast of love was the most desirable for many Roman citizens. Because only once a year, at this day they declared a complete freedom from bonds of marriage and everyone was allowed to make love with anyone, anywhere. Then, unlike the present time, any sexually starving person had quite a legal possibility to be filled at least once a year.

Of course, modern parades of gays in terms of moralists are not as provocative as festive processions and ceremonies in honor of the Goddess of love in Ancient Rome. At least gays do not carry huge phalluses and buttocks through the streets of Berlin or Amsterdam ... So if you ask a European or American of traditional orientation what is best –a gay parade or a parade of Venus, he probably would choose the one which he is used to seeing , not the one closer to nature. And if you ask what is better -sex of a student with the teacher or with his friend, the majority is likely to choose the first, which looks more natural. However, if we consider modern European and American laws, the second is more preferable, that is closer to buttocks... and it is not threatened by jail.

As for the ancient cult of phallus, he was wide spread around the world and even kept in some countries. For example, in Japan. There are still festivals held in its honor. But unlike Ancient Rome, huge phallus is carried on the shoulders not only by women, but also men. In the Internet you can see photos from this holiday.

Numerous artificial barriers, preventing the normal sexual communication of sexes, also contribute such a phenomena as incest. This form of non-traditional relations between close relatives has been known to mankind since biblical times. According to legend, two daughters of Lot made their father drink and had sex with him for the sake of procreation. The famous Soviet writer Ilya Ehrenburg in one of his books, telling about his life in Europe in the early twentieth century, described as he witnessed such a relationship between a Danish widower –a farmer and his daughters. As a woman living in today's Moscow said she had divorced her husband after she saw him in bed with his own mother.

20 years ago, the topic of incest was presented in pornographic films of category «Taboo». In our days the theme «mother and son» on pornographic websites is often completed by homosexual relationships of «mother and daughter». All of this only confirms the hidden interest in this form of non-traditional relationships. In our time, incest is usually explained by sexual hunger and most often occurs between mother and son in the period when they are both at the age of the peak of sexual desire. Single mothers sometimes use their matured sons as lovers. Some of them are not even ashamed of that and openly write about their non-traditional relations in popular social networks of the Internet.

Is Mom better than a whore?

«Why does modern society have a negative attitude to incest? I have a son, we live without a father. The son is 18 years, I am 41, I look not bad for my age. We have regular sex. We protect ourselves, so there is no incest. Pregnancy is ruled out. It is much better than to get some infection from a young whore, isn't it? »

Natalia E., Questions mail.ru

Sometimes this love ends in tragedy. In Lithuania an adult twenty-year-old son beheaded his fourty-year old mother in a fit of wild jealousy, when she was about to marry another man.

Despite all this, some sex extremals believe that a ban on incest is out of date. In the Strasbourg court they are already defending the right of marriage between blood relatives. Officially incest in society has never been approved and is not approved now. But it is punished not in all countries. If in Austria, Canada, Germany and England you can go to jail for this, then in France, Holland, Spain, China and Russia there is no criminal liability for incest. For obvious reasons it is extremely difficult to identify such an uncommon sex. Therefore, stricter sanctions are pointless and are unlikely to solve this problem. Only when sexual hunger is gone, you can count on disappearance of this shameful phenomenon.

###  Is prostitution immortal?

A hundred years ago nearly half of young men started their sexual life with a visit to a public house. Sometimes they were taken there by their fathers, who believed that the first sexual act of their sons must be with an experienced woman. Now such a popular tradition is no longer used.

Public houses, shops and apartments of prostitutes are a kind of air hole for sexually hungry men, many of them are married. It's something like a soup kitchen for the poor, where food was better than at home, but for money... There are many married men who can get what they cannot get in bed with a lawful wife.

When women refuse...

«All men are the same. They come to prostitutes because their wives refuse to give them tenderness or don't want to do in bed, what they are expected to do by their partners. If women were a little closer to their husbands, loved them as much as themselves, 70 percent of our clients were spending their evenings not with prostitutes, but at home with their wives. I'm not talking about the perversions. I'm talking about traditional sex between husband and wife. After all, wives refuse men even in this. That is why they come to us».

Angel Smith, from the book «How to make your man sexually happy. »

We can agree with revelations of a prostitute but only partly. The reason is not only in incompetence, constraint and coldness of many women, but in the nature of males. Even if the wife does everything to please her husband, a sexually active man will sooner or later wag to the side. Not because he is ungrateful wretch, but because of pure physiology, he needs minimal diversity.

In the film by Darya Black «War of sexes» (TV-3 Russia 2010) there is an interesting example: neither cock, nor sheep have sex with one female more than five times. But our men can easily withstand 50. However, after 300-500 times many men started having problems with potency. In a letter to an erotic newspaper a young man complained of difficulties with erection only after a year after his wedding... Experienced men know the best medicine, the essence of which is formulated in a Russian folk saying «A good adultery strengthens marriage». And really, as a rule, after a contact on the side a man feels sexual interest to his wife as well. It is repeatedly tested by millions of men. And by cocks, too. Because nobody changes hens in the coop every week, so the vociferous will have the same hen, but only after communicating with other birds.

There are families where not too sexual, but smart enough wives allow visits of husband to prostitutes, considering them less dangerous for the family than a permanent mistress.

The history of prostitution: from sacred to vulgar

The ancient Greek historian Herodotus in his famous treatise «History» tells about sacred prostitution existed in Babylon. Each woman of Babylon was obliged once in her life to have sex in the temple, but not with a local man, and only with a stranger, whether he was a merchant, a traveler or a simple cameleer. Fresh blood improved the quality of offspring. Such practices existed in ancient times in India, Israel, Cyprus and other countries.

In Ancient Rome bruthels, so-called Lupanars existed in many cities. Including Pompeii, where the home of sold love was dug up by archeologists together with other buildings. The famous «red light district in Amsterdam is known since the 14th century.

In our time in some countries prostitution is legal, while in others it is pursued. Surprisingly, but European legislation in this area is developing in diametrically opposite directions. In Sweden in 1999 due to efforts of militant feminists a unique for the time law was adopted there, according to which clients of prostitutes face a hefty fine and jail, but prostitutes themselves were exempted from any punishment. Such Swedish experience was extended to other countries in Europe. Similar, though not as strict laws have been adopted in Norway, Iceland and Lithuania.

In France brothels were banned in 1946, but prostitution continued to flourish. At the end of 2011 in the French Parliament they tried to adopt a law on prohibition of prostitution and punishment of clients by fines up to 3 thousand Euros and imprisonment up to six months. However, the French trade Union of sex industry workers opposed, arguing that such a law will not eradicate prostitution, but make it marginal and drive it in the shadow.

Most countries in Western Europe have refused to ban prostitution, recognizing it as ineffective. First in the Netherlands in 2000, and then in Germany in 2002 brothels were legalized. Prostitutes there are protected by system of social security and health insurance. Brothels and clubs of intimate Dating are legalized in Austria, Hungary, Spain, Greece, Czech Republic and Switzerland. In Belgium, Denmark, Luxembourg, Finland and Latvia prostitution is allowed only as an individual business. The same situation is in Italy, where brothels were banned in 1958. But now the idea is discussed again to allow them after the example of Germany and the Netherlands. In 2007, the Communist party of Renaissance in Italy proposed to create so-called «sex parks » in Rome, special «work areas» for prostitutes.

In the UK there is an international Union of sex workers (IUSW), which is the ember of GMB since 2003 and is the third largest trade Union in the country. Prostitution there is not prohibited, but has several limitations. In 2004, the Minister of internal Affairs of the country suggested legalizing the activities of some brothels, but this proposal was not accepted.

In pre-revolutionary tsarist Russia brothels existed quite legally. All the prostitutes were registered and were regularly checked by the doctor. In modern Russia sex salons and prostitutes operate illegally, but they are quite accessible. The state does not wish to use the Russian experience of a hundred years and take this sphere under control, so it is under criminals and bring them a good income. In Moscow the daily turnover of sex industry exceeds $ 5 million. Annual turnover is approaching 2 billion, and in Russia as a whole, probably, more than 10 . Official control of prostitution is merely showing off. Therefore, only in Moscow there are more than 100 thousand prostitutes who toil in the sweat of their faces, and in the country there are approximately half a million of them.

The struggle for women's equality has reached sexual services. In 2001 in Switzerland, at the border on Germany the first in Europe brothel for ladies was opened. Now, these institutions also exist in Munich, New York and other cities. In the late second and early third Millennium female sex tourism acquired a mass character. Every year millions of sexually hungry European women rush to the resorts of Turkey, Egypt and other southern countries not only to have rest, but also to relax sexually with a local macho. Some ladies do not even hide it.

It is often said that prostitution and the mafia are immortal. However, some dreaming intellectuals say that sold love is immortal only in the framework of the present unnatural laws and regulations. If Revolution of Love will be able to change them, there will be no sexually hungry people. When a beautiful unselfish sex becomes public, prostitution will disappear by itself. For it is pointless to trade love in the sea of love, it is funny...

###  The era of Masturbation

For mature European young men in the last century there were few opportunities to get natural sexual discharge, therefore masturbation became almost universal. Some girls were fond of it as well. The Church has always angrily condemned such «self-satisfaction». Medicine and pedagogy of the 19th century announced Masturbation a terrible disease that causes impotence, reduction of mental abilities and even madness. No scientific data was behind this, however, until the mid-twentieth century the youth was terrified by horrible, if not fatal, consequences of Masturbation, and even tried to treat it. Some are worried about it until now. Although by the end of the second Millennium, sexologists just found that moderate Masturbation does no threaten potency and is a normal «self-regulation» in the conditions of severe limitations.

Moreover, as it was found by a famous Soviet sexologist Professor Vasilchenko, sexually healthy masturbate more and Vice versa, there are men with severe disabilities of potency among those who never masturbate. With acceleration of puberty the average age of first Masturbation was decreasing. According to research in the late twentieth century Swedish boys started doing this at the age of 13, and girls from 15. In other European countries the situation is similar. As it turned out, the phenomenon is very popular not only among young men.

Impressive figures

In Finland 90 % of men and 77 % of women admitted Masturbation. In France - 84% of men and 42% of women. Two-thirds of them have never experienced guilt about it and think that Masturbation is the normal way of sexual satisfaction. Surprisingly, many people continue to do it after the wedding. In the USA among couples living together 85% of men and 45% women masturbate. And one in four men and one woman in ten do it at least once a week. However, many of them (54 % of men and 47 % of women) feel shame about it.

Why do people masturbate? The most popular answer (73% of men and 63% of women) - to «defuse sexual tension». Further some of them mention «physical pleasure», «no partner», «to relax», «partner does not want to», «to sleep», «boredom» and «fear of AIDS and sexually transmitted diseases».

Igor Kon, «New about Masturbation»

If similar surveys were conducted among some savage tribes, the figures would certainly be much less. Because there simple and natural sexual relations dominate between a man and a woman. There are no great barriers, existing in a civilized society. Say, what is poor Swede to do, if his wife does not want sex, if he goes to a prostitute he will get to prison, but an attempt to get acquainted with another woman in the office or on the street could face accusations of sexual harassment? What can he do? Become a homosexual? And if he doesn't have desire to men? How, then, to get sexual discharge? Only Masturbation... For millions of lonely Europeans it is also the only way out.

The absurdity of civilization

Have you ever thought about the absurdity of our civilization? First they created many laws and Pharisaic obstacles inhibiting the natural communication of men and women, and then created this wonderful industry of Masturbation. And now a lonely man sits and sticks his penis into silicone pussy and somewhere nearby, perhaps even behind the wall of his apartment building, a lonely woman pushes a vibrator between her legs. This is the complete triumph of our great era of Masturbation! Or is it an absurd?

Arseniy Sobolevsky, from the book «TAIS»

How many millions of Europeans are engaged in normal sex for one day? And how many in Masturbation? If there were such studies at all... It would be very interesting to compare the results. But without surveys it is clear that there are much more masturbating people than having normal sex. The same situation is with single people. If we consider the this fact is not uncommon among married couples , it may be that in Europe the total number of masturbating people during the day exceeds the number of those engaged in normal sex with a partner. From the point of view of reason it is a terrible thing. Millions of people instead of giving love, health and pleasure to each other, are forced to be engaged in self-satisfaction.

Society can hardly help people to find each other, although in our computer age it would be not difficult to create a highly effective state system of Dating. Instead, to meet the sexual hunger they offer solutions in the spirit of «the era of Masturbation» in the form of a variety of sex toys. Of course, vibrators can be used by couples to complement and to diversify natural feelings. However, for many single women this ersatz is the only salvation from sexual starvation. Yes, silicone vaginas together with inflatable rubber dolls are produced by sex industry not for sex in a couple, but exclusively for Masturbation. Production of sex shops «is perfectly complemented by prosperous «phone sex» and live cameras on the Internet. All this is in great demand. In our time, business has learned to earn money on everything. Even on sexual hunger and Masturbation.
Chapter 9.

###  The crisis of the family

The history of marriage * The problem of acquaintance and harmony * The war of sexes * Parents and children * Love and faithfulness * New forms

###  The history of marriage

Marriage was originally not monogamous, but polygamous, it means it was not in couples, but group. The word «mother» appeared much earlier than the word «father». Because in ancient times in primitive communities each person could know exactly only one of his parents - the woman who gave him birth and breast-fed. Matriarchy epoch was actually the era of group marriage.

Polyandry and polygamy

«In all forms of group family it is not known who the father is, but we know who his mother is. »

«The study of ancient history, on the contrary, shows us a condition in which husbands live in polygamy, and their wives at the same time - in polyandry, and therefore the children of those and others are considered to be common children of all of them.»

«After all, mutual tolerance of adult males, absence of jealousy was the first conditions for formation of such larger and more durable groups, within which transformation of an animal into a man was only possible. And indeed, what do we find as the oldest, most primitive form of a family, which existence in history we can conclusively prove, and which could still by studied now somewhere? The group marriage, the form of marriage when whole groups of men and whole groups of women mutually belong to each other and which leaves very little room for jealousy. »

Friedrich Engels, «The Origin of the family, private property and the state»

From the point of view of modern morality group marriage or family community seems to be something horrible and utterly wild. However, if we speak about pure physiology, the picture is quite different. It turns out that this form of marriage is much more useful to mankind and supports health of offsprings and future generations much better. Scientists found out that when a woman has several partners, there is a «sperm competition», which is won by the best. As a result the survival of babies born in a polygamous marriage is much higher than in a monogamous. In harsh conditions of primitive society it played a huge role. Then there was only one parent concept of «mother», children called all men in the community «uncles». When a couple families appeared, there was the notion «father» and Patriarchate came instead of Matriarchy. Marriage customs and ceremonies appeared. Initially, some of them reflected polygamous matriarchy past.

Atonement before Mother Nature

«The final of the wedding was accompanied by some more sacred rites... In ancient times the first sexual act, probably, took place in the presence of witnesses. Perhaps initially friends of the husband copulated with the bride. According to Bahosven it was a relic of free prostitution preceding the wedding in primeval era: «the Natural and physical laws are incompatible and even opposed to marriage bonds. Therefore, a woman starting a marriage life should atone her fault before Mother Nature and pass through the stage of a free prostitution, during which she reaches marital chastity through preliminary lasciviousness. »

Otto Kiefer, «Sexual life in Ancient Rome»

Otto Kiefer and especially Johann Bahosfen, who lived in the 19th century, had to put up with morality of society. That is why Otto Kiefer was trying to soften shocking for average citizen information with words «Probable» and «Possible», and Johann Bahosfen disguised the ancient custom writing about «free prostitution», but not about free love, which actually took place in conditions of group marriage. As a result, they wonderfully put together «marital chastity» with «preliminary debauchery» and «free prostitution, but never got the truth. But we will find it anyway.

Let's see why such a strange and depraved, from the point of view of modern morality, custom appeared. In matriarchy epoch in the conditions of polygamy and polyandry, a woman could not belong to only one man; she belonged to all of them. Any member of the family community could count on her love and affection. New monogamous marriage deprived other men of these rights. Therefore, at the wedding they received a kind of natural «ransom», they were allowed to copulate with the bride for the last time. The woman who is getting married thus «atoned her guilt» not only before Mother Nature, but also before all the men of the community.

Gradually the memory of matriarchy, family community and free love has been erased, so over the time this wedding ritual also disappeared. Instead quite different customs appeared. During Patriarchate virginity of the bride was the main priority. For its confirmation after the wedding night a sheet with red spots on it was hung on for public observation. Rulers and eras changed, but Patriarchal principles of marriage remained unchanged. A hundred years ago legislation of the Russian Empire defined family roles and responsibilities as following:

Love according to the law

Article. 106. A husband must love his wife as his own body, live with her in harmony, to respect, protect, excuse her drawbacks and allay her weakness. He is obliged to deliver food to his wife and support her as he can.

Article. 107. A wife must obey her husband as the head of the family, be in love to him, reverence and obedience, please him and accompany him as the mistress of the house.

Compared to modern laws on marriage this text sounds almost like a poem. In the modern Russian legislation about marriage there are no words about love. Instead, they speak only about equality...

The struggle for women's equality began in Europe in the late nineteenth century with requirements of equal voting rights with men, but a hundred years later it resulted in «war of sexes» and almost completed collapse of the institution of family. The divorce statistics simply shocks. Especially if we compare the current situation to how it was a hundred years ago, before the victory of feminism.

The number of concluded marriages decreases dramatically. The average age of grooms and brides has increased significantly over the past decades. Previously, it was 20-25 years, now in many European countries it is up to 30 and more. For example, in Sweden, the average age of the groom is 33, in Denmark \- 32, Germany, Holland, France, Spain, Norway and Switzerland - about 31. Meanwhile, everybody knows that marriages before 30 are twice more lasting than those that are after 30. It is explained by the fact that young people adapt to each other much easier.

###  The problem of Dating and Harmony

The world's first dating Agency was opened in London in September 1650 by Henry Robinson. In those days, most often there were not potential brides and grooms who came there, but their parents who wanted to find relatives from richer and more respectable families. So they were interested not in traits, but in the size of the dowry. One of the first clients of the Agency formulated his wishes about the partner: «the Lady should possess a fortune equaled to 300 guineas. No matter if she was a virgin, a widow or pregnant from her former husband». What is 300 guineas? This is approximately half a million dollars in a modern equivalent. Millions of modern men might agree with this condition as well.

In our time marriage business brings good income, but does not solve all the problems of searching for partners. Numerous agencies are more interested in obtaining income from clients than in making them happy. Many men and women are personally convinced in it due to their own bad experience. A lot of money is often spent in vain. Potential brides are in the most difficult situation. It is extremely difficult to find a good fiancé. Even in multimillion Moscow. A journalist who carried out a special investigation for one of the most popular Newspapers came to such conclusion. It turned out that many clubs are not the most suitable places for encounters. You can't talk in a terrible noise, and can't see anybody in twilight. Besides, many men are in a state of alcoholic or narcotic intoxication. So, there is nobody to look at...

There is no live communication

The problem of loneliness and search for related soul currently is especially acute ... It seems that mobile communication and the Internet has made communication unlimited and accessible anywhere in the world, as people can communicate with each other without any restrictions and interference! But, it may sound paradoxical, but the latest achievements of science and technology have made us more loosely coupled, more isolated and closed: communicating « impersonally» on the web, people have lost the pleasure of personal acquaintance, live communication.

Earlier there were balls, some soirees, where people could have a look at each other, get acquainted... And now? Just think about it: where nowadays an adult person who has already overcame the age limit of youth clubs, discos and parties, can meet his kin? At work? Alas, not always. The staff can be small - there is just nothing to «catch», and in a big staff it is a problem to find somebody as well. At exhibitions? The vast majority of adults (older than 30 years) go to such places in couples. In the movie? Nobody gets acquainted there, even if he comes alone. In a cafe or restaurant? In fitness? Not even funny... it turns out that it is a problem!

Galina Anisimova, gidepark.ru

In restaurants and at discos there are many women dreaming to find a mate. In some cases there are up to 80 per cent of the visitors are women. At the same time good and modest guys often sit at home. Some of them are not interested in night clubs and restaurants, the others just cannot afford them. Because a usual Moscow engineer or clerk can easily leave a third or even half of their monthly salary for dinner with a lady.

It used to be much easier to find a man

It used to be much easier to find a groom than it is now. In Soviet times there was a huge infrastructure of Dating. Every week at weekends there were dances in parks of culture and recreations, culture houses and factory clubs. All this was publicly available, because the tickets were really cheap. It happened that radio or tape recorder was put on the windowsill and people danced in the yard. Then it was even free of charge. And in every city there were Parks of culture and rest, in alleys girls demonstrated their clothes and walked together with her friends, luring gentlemen. From all this, alas, there is little left. The old dating infrastructure was destroyed, but the new one, alas, has not been created yet».

Vladimir Nyrko, «Arguments and Facts »

Of course, changes in traditions and habits also influence growth of loneliness. People have live talks less; they more sit at TVs and computers. Internet helps to brighten up loneliness. The Great illusion of our time allows any woman feel like a Queen of the ball and flirt together with dozens of men. It is a real Paradise for Lovelaces. But the Internet covers not all. It rarely comes to real meetings. But when it comes, it often turns out that, allegedly, a free man is actually married and just longing for love adventures.

Many potential brides who live in small towns are too shy to appear on the Internet. And for those who dwell in big cities it is also so difficult to find a good partner via the Internet. For example, the largest portal of acquaintances of Moscow represents half a million of men's questionnaires. There are women nearly of the same quantity. It is practically unrealistic to see them all even in a narrow age category. Usually people look at first pages of the catalogue, where there are often the same people –professional «grooms» and «brides», who often serve as a bait for dating agencies.

A successful search for a good marriage partner is not only important for those who are lonely, but for the state! It, ultimately, influences and strengthens the institute of family, and increases the birth rate. Therefore it is necessary to promote the development of infrastructure of contacts. It is necessary to take this area on the state care and create a highly professional free Dating service. In our computer age it is not too difficult to create a program that would optimally pick up couples according to visual preferences, tastes and views on life. To prevent people suffer in search of his «needle» in the haystack, but pick up a partner only among those who they really match. This would contribute to creating more harmonious and prosperous married couples.

In each city it would be useful to create social centers of contacts and love. There people could dance, like in good old times. Certain days of the week – for young people, others - for mature people. In such centers there could be not only state service of acquaintances, but also schools of contact and harmony to teach interpersonal communication of sexes. Indeed, one of the main problems is the fact that men and women poorly know and hardly understand each other. Therefore it is so important to teach them to create and maintain beautiful harmonious relations.

A sad statistics

Only 1.5% of interviewed Russian citizens answered positively to the question «Are your relations with your loved person harmonious? »

Free social centers of contacts and love would be useful not only for lonely people, but for married couples as well. Indeed, in many families, after several years of marriage there is boredom and they need help. There are a lot of restaurants and clubs, but no interesting places to communicate to each other.

###  War of sexes

In old Patriarchal family there was no equality, but it had its pluses and minuses. On the one hand, wife was very dependent on her husband and put up with many things. But, on the other, she saw a man as a real support, many modern women can only dream about it now. Yes, and a man in those days as a rule, could not imagine his life without a hostess. She could wash and prepare lunch, and look after the children. And he could not do without it. It this mutual dependence of spouses they did not allow the family to fall apart. Independence, on the contrary, leads, as a rule, to collapse of monogamous family. At the wedding in Church answering the question what is the most important thing in marriage, a wise father usually replied: «Patience! » At all times spouses quarreled and fought with each other, but had to put up with each other whether for the sake of children, whether because of the fact that there was nowhere else to go. People did not know how to live without a family.

Now there are times of equality and independence. Many women earn more than men, and do not see men as a support. Some claim that they don't need men at all. The war of sexes has become a sad reality. On the one hand, it is initiated by women deeply unhappy in love or who never met it at all, and on the other - men, offended on judicial injustice during their divorce, and who see the current laws as discriminatory. Militant feminists do not even hide their fierce hatred to the opposite sex. Some of them can compete in rage and bloodlust with maniacs.

Hatred instead of love

«I want to see a man beaten into a bloody mess, with a heel, scored in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig».

Andrea Rita Dvorkin, American radical feminist and writer

«To call a man an animal means to flatter him ...»

«Today it is technically possible to conceive without help of males, as well as possibly give birth to females only. We need to come to the point immediately. Male is a mistake of nature »

«In its essence, man is a leech, an emotional parasite and, accordingly, has no moral right to live, because no one should live at the expense of others. Just as people have the predominant right to exist before dogs, because they are more developed and have higher consciousness, in the same way women have the right to life before men. Destruction of any man is a good and a right action quite advantageous for women, as well as an act of mercy»

Valery Solange, feminist (famous for the fact that she shot a famous artist)

«The number of men must be decreased and kept at the level of 10% of all the population».

Sally Gerhard, professor of university and an open lesbian

«If life on this planet is going to survive, we must do decontamination of the earth. I think that it will correspond to the purposes of evolution - sharp decrease of the number of men».

Mary Daly, economist and feminist

Current feminists in the West are fundamentally different from red feminists, who led sexual revolution in Soviet Russia in the 20s of the last century. Alexandra Kollontai and Inessa Armand had quite traditional sexual orientation. They loved men and gave birth to children. Inessa Armand was even a mother of many children. Among modern feminists there are many lesbians who organically hate members of the opposite sex. Such people sometimes define European policy and promote draconian laws to destroy the family and impede normal love.

Of course, not all feminists are as vicious and bloodthirsty as Andrea Rita Dvorkin. And not all women are sympathetic to them. Most of them are normal and dream about simple women's happiness and man's love. However, it is obvious that the war of sexes destroys institution of marriage. This war began in Europe in 60-70s as a struggle with «Patriarchal family» and against «slavery of women». It is interesting to read memories of witness of those events.

An alternative to a normal family

«They were looking for an alternative to a normal harmonious family. It was a «red» socialist and Communist movement, very popular not only in Europe but also in Scandinavia. A direct call to the cell of bourgeois society and its welfare – a normal family, where the father is the head, that is, so-called Patriarchy. We were then children, teenagers, and even at school this effect was noticeable. Almost everything that was male was considered negative; it was laughed at, mocked».

Lane Dalberg, journalist of «Radio Sweden»

Since then almost half a century has passed. You can evaluate all the achievements of feminists. An alternative to «Patriarchate» was found in homosexual marriages which are recognized now in Sweden even by the Church. But normal harmonious family is actually destroyed. Hounded Swedish men became «silk», but it didn't bring happiness to anyone. The number of divorces and single people in Sweden is the biggest in Western Europe. But they have stopped «domination of men» and «slavery of women». In existing families traditional roles are often turned upside down. A Lithuanian, who was married to a Swede, was very surprised being a guest at the family party and seeing a picture: a man in an apron with a baby is at the cooker, and the woman with her friends smoking on the balcony, discussing their Affairs.

Shifting traditionally female functions on men has its natural limits. Men can babysit with children, but they cannot give birth to them. Meanwhile, the struggle for equality for many feminists boils down to unconditional right of women to give birth to only one child or not to give birth at all to be equal with men. Although in all ages motherhood was considered a top women's happiness, given by the nature.

Feminism limits the rights of women

«Feminists are screaming with foam on the mouth that they are fighting for the rights of women. The basic tools feminists operate with are a lie, hypocrisy and demagogy. There is a lie even in the name of FEMINISM! Feminists are people with pronounced female qualities? Maybe men fall down within a kilometer from their feminine charm? Or each feminist has 10-15 children? No. An indispensable attribute of experienced, advanced feminists is hatred to men. Feminists simultaneously hate men and try to imitate them - a kind of schizophrenia in thinking and actions. Besides the fact that feminists hate men, they hate children and normal women. The last are covered with mud by all means, and phrases like «kitchen & maternity machine» are not from the most powerful ones. Feminism limits the rights of women, exposes moral terror and defamation of normal women and actively fuels war of sexes»

Leo, «Men's almanac»

The idea of full gender equality is initially defective. Man and woman are created different. Therefore, full equality is impossible just because of different physiology. But for some reason it is not taken into account. Say, we are not surprised that in the zoo bear and hare do quite the same job, but they are fed differently, and the zoo spends much more money on bear. But nobody boils over it and doesn't scream about injustice. Why do we consider physiology to be important concerning animals, but not concerning men? Is it really just because some militant feminists consider them to be lower than animals? It is known that a two-meter man needs twice more food than a miniature woman. Simple clothes and footwear for such men are also much more expensive. In this case, will equal pay be fair? Traditionally men are involved in the most difficult and most dangerous work. But quite not stupid feminists are striving for full equality, not in the fire brigades and coal mines, but in the Parliament, government and the boards of Directors of major companies. They even put private business on knees.

Golden skirts

«French companies are urgently looking for women. The career prospect is in the Board of Directors. ...by 2017 40% of the seats in the boards of Directors of public companies and companies with a turnover of more than € 50 million per year should be taken by women. For failure of this quota the companies will face serious sanctions... In 2007, a similar law was passed in Spain, where 40% of the quota is scheduled for 2015.

...The first country in the world to introduce quotas for women in business was Norway... Investors in big business were horrified by this decision. In 2003, only 7% of the seats in the boards of Directors of public companies were occupied by women. Companies were asked to increase the number by almost six times -up to 40%.

Often Golden skirts -in Norway this term is used to call influential women in business - hold important positions simultaneously in several companies: from three to twelve, which also negatively affects the quality of work».

Yulia Smirnova, «Forbes»

The right to be the first to die

« - The feminist movement... loves people who unreservedly accept the idea of women as victims, but just dare to remind them that men die earlier than women in all fifty of the leading causes of death or that prostate cancer research is financed by seven times less than breast cancer research at the same level of mortality, they will immediately become red with anger. Ask from the point of view of a taxpayer how your taxes go to health care, as 80 years ago women lived only one year more than men, and now they live about seven years longer »

...We are in a very, very dangerous time today. In America and in most industrialized countries, men are seen by feminists today, just as Jews were considered by Nazi Germany.

Men are like Jews, who in their time were regarded as those who had power in their hands, and, at the same time, as the source of all problems. Do you think this analogy is correct?

Jews were burnt in kilns only because they were Jews, millions of men were killed on the fronts of battles just because they were men. This is called military duty...»

From an interview of Warren Farrell - American writer and public figure.

Warren Farrell began his career as a convinced feminist and was elected in the Board of New York branch of the «National Organization for Women». In his first book, «A Free man (1974) » he called on men to support women's movement. Over time, however, the views of Warren changed dramatically. It is reflected in his book «Why men are as they are (1986) », and then in even more radical books «The Myth of male authority (1993)» and «Seven greatest myths about men». For two decades, Warren Farrel managed to influence U.S. public opinion and achieve recognition of men's rights to protect their interests. Now he heads the Council on Affairs of youth and men, created under Obama administration. There are no similar organizations in Europe yet.

###  Parents and children

In many European countries there are already more than half of children born out of wedlock. Baby collapse replaced baby boom .Characteristic for modern Europe late marriages entail late childbirths. If in early 1970s peak of births was at the age group 20-24 years, now it is nearly ten years later. Even in southern Europe apparent peak of baby birth is at the age of 30-34 years. Doctors call the reproductive function - fertility. It is established that at the age of 35 women are two times less fertile than at the age of 25, and at 40 - two times less fertile than at 35. This means that the most active child-bearing age, the most favorable for conception and birth of a healthy child, is limited by 25 years. After that edge a woman's ability to conceive starts falling. It increases the risk of congenital diseases and complications of pregnancy. For example, it is found that the Down's syndrome in children is largely determined by the mother's age. If under the age of 24 one such case is for one thousand five hundred of births, after 45 years each nineteenth baby is a Down! Is it any wonder that over the past decade the number of such intellectually challenged individual has increased in Europe by 30 times!

The perfect age

«Characteristic for the modern family reproductive model is not biological. Now the average age of a woman giving birth for the first time has passed far beyond 25 years. While the ultimate biologically optimal age for the first births is 16 years».

Vladislav Galetskiy, «Will institution of family meet the 22nd century? »

It is a paradox but the time when conception occurs easily in modern society is considered «ill-time» because it doesn't coincide with «social maturity». And by the time when the woman finally manages to get education, makes a career and gets acquainted with her husband, her reproductive functions are disastrously weakened and there is a big problem not only for her, but also for her offsprings. What is now called «early pregnancy», for almost entire history of mankind was the norm established by the nature itself. Exactly the same as the current average European «norm» of the first birth in 30 years looked abnormal at all times, except ours.

Victims of career

«Increasing of educational level and new career opportunities for women in Europe have led to a situation when almost every fifth woman in Finland, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands to 40 years of age is childless. Reduction of population of Europe is voluntary and is the result of hundreds of millions of men and women who choose to have fewer children than it is necessary for reproduction of the population»

Joseph Cheymi, former Director of the United Nations Department's Bureau of population, journal Globalist.

But, of course, the main problem is not in career and excessively tightened education. A too good social security played the main role in the fall of fertility. Before, children served as a kind of investment in the old age for people, like a «living pension». Having babies parents would give them care and love, which then is returned to them in old age. Now Europeans more hope on the state rather than on their children. However, in current demographic trends and the rapid ageing of the population, generous social security will fall down very soon. A study conducted by the CIA warns that « structures of social protection in Europe will collapse in ten years ». And it will be the time when Europeans will inevitably have to give birth to many children to ensure a decent old age.

In the Parliament of Finland they have already discussed the idea to shift the pensions of parents to children, at least partially. And the Russian citizen Valery Akparov wrote an open letter to the Russian President, which gave many persuasive arguments in favor of radical pension reform aimed to stimulate the birthrate.

Open letter to the President of the Russian Federation (fragments)

«...Reverse economic ties between children and parents are lost. It is enough to restore it, and children, and not only the first child will become extremely desirable...

To restore the flow of money from children to parents is very easy, it is just enough to change the pension system and send all contributions directly to parents ' accounts, by passing the bureaucratic apparatus of the pension Fund. Pension will be accumulated immediately, as soon as the child begins to earn money. The economic benefit of the child will be immediately clear. More children –more pensions you will have. 10 children - ten pensions.

What is the quality of children, what is their salary or profit, such is the pension.

If a child drinks or is in prison, where does the money come from? Upbringing of morality will become vital.

If the child has gone to America for permanent residence - pension has left as well. Patriotism will be brought up from the cradle. If a husband left his wife with a child, it means he lost his pension as well. Family will become stronger. Children will be taken more seriously. Immediately children from orphanages and children's homes will be taken to homes»

«No need to explain that with adoption of this system there will be no need in transition to a funded insurance pension, increasing of the pension age and attracting immigrants».

Valeriy Akparov, akparov.ru

The main problem is that the relationship between children and parents in the last hundred years has radically changed. Among Europeans now very few care about the immediate ancestors. Of course in our time we can meet adult children who show special attention to their parents. But there are not many. There are much more others. According to the legal norms of the pre-Peter times, today we could flog half of Russia for the lack of appropriate care for their parents. Three hundred years ago there was no mass pension, so there was nobody to support old people, only their children could do it. Tsar could not afford parents in old age to beg and join the ranks of the panhandlers.

Therefore, by the laws of that time bad sons and daughters were publicly thrashed by sticks-Batogs to show the others that it was not good to save money on old parents.

Supporters of Patriarchal family love telling the story of how in «good old days» large family sat down at the table together and if someone started eating before father, got a spoon on his forehead. And no one dared to complain. Why were parents respected and revered for many centuries in Russia? Not only because Church brought up in austerity and humility, but because there were strict laws on the side of parents that gave parents great power over the children. This allowed to straighten out brains to even the most violent and unruly ones. Father had the right to put his offspring to prison without a trial. Moreover, in any age- even in adulthood! There was the reason for sons to be afraid of their fathers. Here are excerpts from the law of the Russian Empire on marriage, which was in operation a hundred years ago:

To prison without a trial

Article 164. Power of parents covers children of both sexes and of all ages.

Article 165. Parents, to punish obstinate and insubordinate children, have the right to use the home corrective measures. In case of the failure of the measures it is in parental authority to do the following:

1) to take children of both sexes to prison who are not involved in public service, for stubborn disobedience to parental authority, a dissolute life and other obvious defects ;

2) to send complaints about them to judicial establishments. For stubborn disobedience to parental authority, for a dissolute life and other obvious defects children, at the request of parents, are taken to prison without special trial for a term from 2 to 4 months. In this case, parents have the right to increase the length of imprisonment at their discretion or declare the beginning of the punishment ».

It seems that the law is so terrible. However, in many cases, it prevented more serious crimes in the future, and saved varmints from much longer imprisonments. Probably, many of the current Russian prisoners would willingly exchange their perennial sentences for a couple of months in «parent » prison, which would help to bring them to reason in time.

In tsarist times, when a bourgeois couldn't cope with his overgrown son, who mired in drunkenness, theft or riot, he just sent him to a slammer. Then they did very well without sobering-up stations and drug treatment services. A couple of months spent behind bars acted very sobering. After leaving prison the son, of course, didn't want to go back again. Therefore, as a rule, he took up his mind and gave up drinking. Then he married and pleased his parents with a bunch of grandchildren.

And now in the same Russian city a pensioner asks the police to protect her from the forty-year-old son, who drinks hard, mocks her and takes her pension. In response, it was explained that they can't put him in jail by existing laws , only if he slaughters her ... The poor woman is unlikely to have grandchildren , and her son after some drunken brawl with the murder will go to prison for a long-term.

Modern Russian law on marriage, in contrast to the tsarist one, limits the authority of parents over children. Article 61 provides that: « Parental rights are terminated when a child reaches the age of 18 and if the children get married...». Similar laws exist in other European countries.

Fathers and mothers in our time are not spoiled by attention of their grown up children, as a rule. And they are not respected. The media touches this topic extremely rarely. Unimaginable noise is reached only if a parent abuses and scoffs a child, and if Vice versa, then it is not interesting. Press and TV only notice quite exceptional cases. For example, when a schoolboy hired a killer for Papa and Mama just to get the apartment. Less sensational cases are often left without any attention. And how many fathers and mothers are abused! How many are sent to the other world quietly by hands of their matured children and without initiating criminal proceedings!

This moral degradation of our society is largely the fault of parents. Because in the last few generations the top family motto was: «Everything for the children! » Or another widespread phrase: «Let us have one child, but we shall not refuse him of anything! ». As a rule, only parents give something to children and grandchildren, and not vice versa. Even if parents are poor and the grown up child is rich.

The fewer children in the family - the more tremulous is the attitude of parents to him. Especially when he was given birth with great difficulty and at a later age. This exaggerated concern for children has generated the first juvenile justice, and then juvenile terror. Now neither teacher can touch children even with finger, nor even parents. As a result, even the little ones become ungovernable.

Geniuses under the blows of the stick

«In the 19th century regular physical punishment for educational purposes were used for at least 95% of children. By the end of the twentieth century, this figure decreased up to 30%, and including those who were subjected to punishment at least once. Life found out to be more difficult and tragic than many humanistic illusions. It turns out that many great artists were created only under the sticks pressure, as there was no other ways to get kids to learn gammas for 8 hours a day, as well as to practice fouetté and batmans. »

Vladislav Galetskiy, «Will institution of family meet the 22nd century? »

The level of education in schools has been steadily declining, but there is more freedom and violence .A hundred years ago no one would have believed that in every American school there would be a police post. Probably, it will happen in Europe soon, where many countries blindly copy the American experience. Most significant results of juvenile justice were gained in France, where it has existed since 50s of the last century. During this time, more than 2 million children have been taken away from parents.

In the conditions of juvenile terror no children are afraid of their parents, but parents are afraid of children. Because any intelligent and erudite child, being angry with dad and mom can send them to jail. It is enough to break his head, to put bruises, and then declare that it was made by his cruel parents.

Stop the juvenile madness!

«Juvenile law is based on the false principle of the priority of human rights of a child over the rights of parents, on the possibility of interference of juvenile justice services in family Affairs.

...Fundamental moral norms, primarily such as respect for parents and obedience to them, respect for elders, are actually canceled out. Children are given the right to sue the parents, teachers, and generally adults and parents are subtracted from their legal and natural right to educate children and to define a system of priorities.

...Juvenile court cancels the principle of presumption of innocence, and all parents are treated as potential criminals, who have to be watched and controlled constantly. Thus they created and encourage Institute of denunciation of children on parents. ... We are the participants of the rally against introduction of juvenile justice in Russia, appeal to authorities with a demand to stop juvenile madness! »

From the open appeal of the citizens of St. Petersburg to authorities of Russian Federation in the protection of the family, 2010

A hundred years ago, children were mercilessly thrashed with a belt by parents, and school strict teacher sometimes painfully beaten with a ruler. But then in schools there were no guards and police. And students did not shoot their classmates. Now it happens regularly, in one or in another country. And it happens more often in countries where juvenile justice especially succeeded. A hundred years ago children were very scared of fathers, but they did not hire killers, as it happens now.

Earlier it was a crime to murder children, but no corporal punishment .Now everything is Vice versa. A hundred years ago it was not accepted to tear infants by medical forceps in the womb. Almost all children were allowed to be born. But this is a true humanism!

###  Love and faithfulness

From ancient times a pair of swans was considered to be a symbol of faithfulness. They were depicted on wedding cards and floor mats that were hung beside the bed of newlyweds. But recently scientists have found that even swans are unfaithful. A genetic test conducted by zoologists of University of Melbourne showed that one cub of a swan of the six is «illegitimate». And it is true not only for Australia. Russian scientists have recorded change of partners among Swan couples.

The main virtue of monogamous marriage has always been faithfulness. Unfaithfulness has been strongly condemned. It is the main reason for divorce in modern marriage contracts of famous stars of show business and cinema. The American TV show based on hunting for adulterer enjoyed such great popularity that it was demonstrated in many countries of the world, including Russia.

Treason on request

In Kiev there is an Agency, which helps to verify the spouse of loyalty. For this they send a specially trained « temptress» or a «seducer» to them. All stages of love story are under full control. «Adultery» is fixed on the photo and video, or provides the customer with the opportunity to expose a partner at the moment of «treason». The new service is in great demand, although by Ukrainian standards it is not so cheap - $ 500 and more. It is interesting that more than 90 percent of orders are received from women. One of them wanted to divorce her husband for a long time, but she couldn't find his fault. Unsuspecting husband couldn't resist mistress hired actually by his own wife. And it gave her the reason for divorce.

Every bride dreams of a faithful husband, although it is known that three out of four men are unfaithful in marriage. Of the remaining 25 percent, at least 20 confess that they dream about it and haven't done yet just because they didn't have a chance. Such data was received in the course of an anonymous opinion poll conducted in Russia. That means that monogamy is not observed by almost all men with normal libido and without any serious health problems. Speaking about women, about half of them are unfaithful, although in some modern sources they say about 70 percent. So, if we are based on the data of these studies and the experience of the new Ukrainian Agency, it turns out that women are unfaithful one and a half times less than men or almost the same, but they become jealous by ten times more.

According to the advice of revelatory television and women's magazines, unfaithful husband is the one who must be banished off. As a result of such propaganda of «marital fidelity» more than half of women are ready to ruin their family, when they learn about betrayal of her husband. Although according to studies, only 5 percent of men abandon their families due to mistresses. It turns out that the reaction of many women on treason reminds headache treatment with an axe. That is too jealous wives destroy ten times more families with their own hands than unfaithful husbands. Thus, a wide spread propaganda of «marital fidelity» is actually a propaganda of destruction of the family.

Freedom of sexual relations

«Old relative freedom of sexual relations has not disappeared with the victory of couple marriage or even monogamy. »

«Thus, monogamy appears in the story not as something based on the consent of the Union between a man and a woman, and even less as the highest form of this Union. On the contrary. It appears as enslavement of one sex by the other, as proclamation of unknown earlier, in the previous history of contradictions between sexes. »

Friedrich Engels, «The Origin of the family, private property and the state»

So, the classic of Marxism rightly noted that even in conditions of a couple marriage freedom of sexual relations does not disappear. A few years after the wedding vows of fidelity to the grave, husbands often get mistresses, and wives - lovers. That means that monogamy is more often only declared, but not kept. Therefore monogamous marriage, in real life, is not «the highest form » of Union between a man and a woman. Many thinkers wrote about falsehood and unnaturalness of monogamous marriage. A famous Russian philosopher Nikolai Berdyaev was among them.

Lies and hypocrisy

«Absolute monogamous marriage as the law is created in case of disaster. In case of happiness it is nothing to say about and nothing to claim according to the law. Contradictions of monogamy are generated by unsuccessful love, fatal mismatch. And we must resolutely say that monogamous marriage is not a natural law of sexual union. Monogamous marriage is not inherent to the «nature» of a man, but on the contrary.

...In fact, in modern society, in modern social commonness of real monogamous marriage does not exist; it is conditional lie and hypocrisy».

Nikolai Berdyaev, philosopher, «The destiny of a man»

Supporters of traditional faithfulness might not accept such judgments and give examples of «happy couples» as a counter-argument, who lived together all their lives and celebrated their Golden wedding. Indeed, there are still such couples, although fewer and fewer. The 50th wedding anniversary is often a holiday parade, where everybody congratulates, but rarely asks if the people are really happy, having lived in complete faithfulness for half a century. When one woman, celebrating the golden wedding was asked to tell honestly how long they were happy with her husband, she replied very briefly: «Just three years...»

That means they were happy while there was romantic love. And then the birth of children, family boredom, endless quarrels and insults. If the man was really faithful for half a century, it is likely that sexual life was pleasant for them, but not for a long time. Absolute faithfulness for a man is the right way to impotence. Sometimes by chance a faithful husband falls under the charm of another woman and discovers in amazement that he is not an impotent, but a real macho. And his wife in this case often wonders- the husband can do nothing in bed, but all girls are running for him for some reason.

Some men sometimes have a different situation, they have a normal erection only with his wife but he can do nothing with other women. And though this happiness never lasts all the life, many women dream about such spouse. Because almost everyone wants to be unique. Real or alleged breach of fidelity usually causes jealousy. They say, jealous –means loves. But is it really so?

Substitution of Love

We think we love when we choke our loved with jealousy... not even thinking that jealousy means hatred. This imaginary love inflates our sense of self-importance, cultivating in us occupiers.

Alex Vindgolts

Love dies in prison

If a man loves on the principle of possession, it means that he wants to deprive the object of his love of freedom and keep her under control. Such love does not give life, but suppresses, ruins, smothers and kills it.

Erich Fromm, sociologist, psychologist and philosopher, «To have or to be»

In real love unfaithfulness is allowed!

«I remembered how jealous I was when I was married – 5-6 years ago a thought that my man might have another woman was terrible. Much time has passed, and year after year, with every new guy my attitude to unfaithfulness was changing. Now I just take it easy when know about other women in lives of my men, that the one, who I was 5 years ago – would be really shocked.

Why do I take it so easy? Does it mean that I don't love my men? Yes, I do! I love them so much! But I just perceive love to men not like it is usually perceived in our world \- but Vice versa. When I think of my boyfriend- husband that he is «mine», «belonging only to me, » as if «my property» it is not love, it's only selfishness. When I enjoy because he only looks at me, and suffer when he wants to be with other women it is not love...it is merely a desire to consume a person, to use him for your own benefit, neglecting his desires.

Yes, of course, it is very difficult to love. And it is even harder to accept that real love is a violation of your interests for the sake of interests of another person. Any sane selfish person will become hysterical, proving to everyone and everywhere that if «you don't love yourself , nobody will love you », claim that love can be only when one looks at the other all the life and never to the left... It's all just an excuse of selfishness, wishing to take and never give, well, or at most «I to you, and you to me. »

But love means only one thing - the desire to give enjoyment to the other, even if it is bad for you. And that «detriment» means that there is no detriment at all, because such real love always brings great pleasure to the loving person, even more than to the loved one ».

Mila-laska. livejournal

True love should not become a prison for your beloved. In the previous chapter we already told about anthropology Professor Helen Fisher, after years of research he came to the conclusion that a person is able to love several partners. That is, love can exist without primitively understood faithfulness. At the same time, sometimes there is faithfulness without love. It can be observed in many traditional couples. By and large, love without «prison» faithfulness is much better than faithfulness without love.

President with two wives

When journalists asked President Francois Mitterrand if it was true that he had a daughter on the side, Mitterrand calmly replied: «Yes, it's true. And what? » Then he added: «It's nobody's business! » The French people were shocked not by the fact that mistress of Mitterrand gave birth to his daughter, but by the fact that the former President put his informal family on state allowances, and even provided them with police protection. This was revealed after death of Mitterrand.

In French Parliament in the middle of 19th century they discussed the idea of legalization of bigamy. Moralists rejected this too bold law, but the problem has not disappeared. Not only great leaders, but also ordinary Frenchmen often live for two families. Probably not by chance this issue was discussed in one of modern French plays, where the main hero is a taxi driver with two wives.

In other countries it is also not uncommon. For example, in Russia Admiral Kolchak and Marshal Zhukov were «torn» between two women, as well as Nobel laureates writers Ivan Bunin, Boris Pasternak. And even Dostoevsky together with his still alive but dying wife there was a young girlfriend, who became a prototype of Nastasya Filippovna in the novel « Idiot».

In our time many influential politicians and wealthy businessmen in Russia have not one, but several mistresses. For example, Mikhail Evdokimov a popular artist, who became the Governor of Altai territory, lived not with two, but three families! As it turned out after his death in a car accident, in addition to the official he had two more informal wives. Each of them gave birth to a child for him, he provided both with a house and protection. So the Governor of the Altai territory surpassed the President of France in his scope of extramarital affairs.

For the sake of justice it should be noted that in addition to polygamy there has always been cases of polyandry, i.e. sexual relations of women with several partners. One woman half-jokingly stated that for full happiness she needs three men, one for the family, another for love, and the third for sex. Indeed, a good caring husband is not always a good lover. And good lovers are seldom good husbands...

The propensity to polyandry

«According to psychologists, a tendency to polyandry is in all women on a subconscious level, as the evolution of the human society began exactly with matriarchy. So - historical "genes"! And nothing can be done. Hence that is the reason for many conflicts: a woman wants to have several husbands, but morals don't allow to.

Is it possible for you to have several husbands? 14% answered positively, 40% could not give a definite answer. But psychologists say that 14% is not the final figure and if respondents are talked to more, the number will increase significantly. This testifies about the open polyandry. But there is still a latent, a hidden form, when a woman interacts, communicates, cohabits with many men, but on a specific schedule, that is, in order of priority».

Medobzor.net

A brilliant physicist, laureate of Nobel award academician Lev Landau said that «marriage is a cooperative that kills love». His theory of love and marriage on «how to build a personal life for a man properly » Landau considered not less notable than that one for which he received the Nobel Prize. As his wife admitted in her memoirs, academician always regretted that his best theory would never be published.

A story of love

They met in Kharkov in the early 30s, when the 27-year-old scientist was already world-famous. By the time Concordia (Cora) Drobantseva divorced with her first husband, and Lev Landau was still a virgin (!!!), because even in his youth he was fascinated by science and gave himself a vow «never to smoke, drink or marry». However, he could not resist the dazzling beauty and began to take care of her violently and beautifully. At first he was not going to get married.

Landau was not only a brilliant physicist, but a theorist of free love. Essentially, he was a real sexual revolutionary. The scientist believed that lies and jealousy destroy marriage most of all. He therefore concluded with Concordia a «non-aggression Pact in married life», which gave both spouses relative freedom in love affairs beyond the family. Cora swore that she would never be jealous to other women, and since 1934 they lived together. Officially they registered their relations only in 1946, a few days before the birth of their son. Free marriage and amorous adventures didn't prevent them from loving each other tenderly all their lives.

Happiness is a personal freedom, as Lev Landau thought. He never hid his long and fleeting love affairs. Even it happened that he took his mistresses home, where his beautiful wife cooked dinner for them and laid bed. The academician provided his wife with the same full freedom, and even insisted that she would enjoy it. Sometimes he recommended her nice men out of their circle. Quite in the spirit of the first sexual revolution, when in Soviet Russia there was a popular slogan «a Good wife chooses the mistress for the husband herself! »

Of course, most women perceive such a slogan only as a mockery of traditional marriage. However, lovely woman, let's think calmly about it without emotions. If the «left» sex is inevitable, which will be safer for your husband and for you personally: with a dirty whore somewhere or with your neat friend at your home? The answer is obvious, isn't it?

Nowadays, more and more people do not want to oppose the family to free love. They find new forms of relations, which do not destroy marriage, but even strengthen it.

###  New forms

According to sociological study of 11 000 couples, conducted by academician Michael Litvak, only 5 percent of men and women would be willing to re-enter the Union with the same person. This is the true level of happiness in the traditional monogamous marriage.

« A neighbour's wife always seems more beautiful » - says an Old Russian proverb. It is echoed by the words of the song by Boris Grebenschikov: «Everyone wants someone else's (wife) - nobody wants his own». In Soviet times, in one of the avia towns in the Far East one officer constantly looked at the wife of his neighbour. Then noticed that the neighbour is not indifferent to his wife. Ultimately they decided to swap wives. The story reached the high authorities, who resented: «Why was the political commissar who was to look after the morals of Soviet officers inactive?» But it turned out that it was the commissar who changed his wife, who he was bored with, to another one, more attractive... Hardly Soviet military pilots knew then that they repeated the experience of their American colleagues.

History of origin of swing

During the Second World War Americans were flying to bomb the Japanese from the Pacific Islands. In the air bases pilots could live together with their wives. That was the birthplace of unusual tradition, which was marked as the beginning of swing. There was a war, planes were shot and pilots were often killed. However, the wife of the deceased was not left alone. Best friend, as a rule, «shared» her husband with her realizing that she could appear in the same situation at any moment.

After the war, in peace time, this tradition was continued. In 1957 the American men's magazine, «Mister» published an article on exchange of wives. It turned out that in the US many couples practice it. Swing was a publicly discussed phenomenon. By 1960, about 20 dating magazines had a special section «Couple is looking for a couple». Swing clubs started to appear later. They were of two types – «open - on-premises» and «closed - off-premises». «Off» means that in this club Charter prohibits sexual contacts during parties and meetings. And «On» - allows. Later swing became widespread in Europe

It is considered that the exchange of partners is the most popular in the USA, where it was used at least once by every fifth couple (20%), three to five times - every sixth (15%) and regularly practice 8% of the spouses. According to recent surveys, even in smug UK about two million couples already tried swing. And the other six million admitted that they wouldn't be against to try. The number of Swingers is constantly growing and in other European countries, including Russia.

By the way, this phenomenon occurred even in Soviet times, in some closed scientific towns. There young scientists were working on a secret military projects and lived according to their sexual laws, in a polygamous family. Friendships were organically complemented by intimate. On Fridays and Saturdays there were regularly sex parties with exchange of wives. It should be noted that group sex and swing is not the same. Swing does not always lead to an orgy, and not every orgy is swing.

It seems utterly incredible, but exchange of wives is quite beneficial for consolidation of the family. As shown by studies conducted in the United States there are practically no divorces among swingers. The survey showed that by exchanging partners in the majority of even quite happy families relations improved noticeably. And among those who thought that their marriage is «miserable» before swing and was going to divorce, noted improvements by 90 percent! During the studies they tested the general «level of happiness» among swingers, compared to conventional families. It turned out that they are twice happier than average Americans.

Freedom helped us!

«It was in the situation when our family was on the edge of divorce and we came to swing. And we can say it definitely helped!!! In our family, everything was perfect except sexual relations. Swing gave us the necessary diversity in sex, helped to relax. And moreover, now we sincerely believe that our relations are now more natural than relations of normal couples. The opportunity to realize our sexual fantasies on the side, absolutely openly, raised our relations to a new level and added the necessary raisin to home sex».

Elfik, 30 years

Everything is honest

«Everyone knows that even the most flaming love eventually fades and goes into a strong affection and family friendship. We feel comfortably together. We understand each other perfectly. But in bed after ten years of marriage there is absolute boredom. What shall we do? To run from each other to the side for excitement? But isn't it better to run for excitements together with your wife? In this case everything is honest. This is what I call swing».

Alexander , swinger

Swing is only the first step towards the creation of a new type of family free from lie and hypocrisy. American scientist Gilbert Bartel was one of the first who studied this social phenomenon. In his book «Group sex» he noted very interesting points.

Are swingers afraid of love?

«Most of our respondents noted that swing improved their family relationships, both friendly and sexual».

«On the basis of his New York study O'neills came to a conclusion that is on everyone's lips states that a married couple, which is engaged in group sex, never falls apart »

«Almost all swingers without exception we got acquainted with were constantly looking for new partners, because a typical couple has sexual contact with another couple only once».

«Most restrictions for groups engaged in group sex, are the same. It is strictly prohibited not only to say, «I love you», but you cannot even show your emotions, saying: «I like you», they can say: «You are the most gorgeous», or: «you have a great body, » or «I like the way you look », or: «You make me excited », or something to compliment your partner. But no tender words - they assume excessive infatuation».

Gilbert Bartel, «Group sex »

Why is it so? First of all swing couples are afraid of strong affection and the emergence of love between new partners, since this, in their opinion, may threaten the destruction of their families. That is, Swingers, as a rule, do not seek stronger relations between couples and establishment of a «Swedish family». Thus, swing may be only a transitional form between current monogamy and polygamy in the future. Much closer to the future are poliamors.

The term «polyamory » comes from Greek «πολυ» – numerous, extensive and Latin «amor» – love. This system of ethic views admits the possibility of existence of multiple human love relationships. To denote polyamory they use a variety of symbols, but the most common logo is a blue symbol of infinity (∞) on a white background with a heart with a red rim. It can be interpreted as a symbol of infinite love in time and breadth of the space. Unlike Swingers poliamors are not afraid of love, but, on the contrary, seek to its expansion.

Sex is not the main defining part of poliamor relations. The supporters of polyamory give priority not to purely physical but emotional ties. Relationships tend to be based on love and trust. They do not see a threat in partners of their partners, and they do not see them as rivals. Therefore any manifestation of jealousy is excluded.

Supporters of traditional monogamous relationship argue that love is not divided into parts and you can really love only one person. However poliamors are sure: if love is donated to not one man, but more, it does not become worse. This thought was best expressed by a famous American writer Robert A. Heinlein: «Love is not divided, it is multiplied! »
Chapter 10.

###  Revolution of love and ethnic war

###

Lie, love and economy * The Golden age after Apocalypse * A creeping ethnic war * Freedom to young love! * The family commune * The role of Russia * The world reason instead of the world government

###  Lie, love and economy

We live in the world mired in lies. Millions of men and women build their relations on hypocrisy and deception. Society glorifies love and strangles it at the same time. Humanity declares most tender feelings towards the nature and ruthlessly destroys it. European politicians declare their love for their people and lead them to complete degeneration.

According to advertisement, banks and business are touchingly concerned about consumers, although actually the main priority for them is not people, but money. Greed of modern banks is beyond the pale. First, they impose loans and then drive the people into an unsustainable cabala and take their property. They strive to earn money on everything. Earlier it was enough for them to earn on difference between deposits and loans. Let's say they attracted money of depositors at 5 percent per annum, and gave a loan at 15. For modern bankers this margin is not enough and they charge a fee for each transaction. A piece of paper with an extract from the account, which we get from the cash machine sometimes costs to the client as much as a loaf of bread, though it is hardly equivalent concerning the actual costs. When paying small bills «honorarium» of the bank often equals to the amount of the payment. Thus, the poor people are flogged two skins. Many people remember that before the situation was different and customers were served almost free of charge. Now they have to pay even for self-service transaction of payment on the Internet without direct participation of the Bank employees. But this is not enough. When withdrawing cash they get 3% of the amount! It is like godless extortions of feudalism. The most amazing thing is that the authorities seem not to notice wild arbitrariness of banks. Consumer defenders keep silent as well. Press and television are purchased, probably, by expensive banking advertising. In Western countries, where the abuse and arrogance of banks reached unprecedented scale, people are not willing to keep silence. There appeared a movement «Capture Wall Street», which came out against crimes of «financial elite» with requirement to «separate the money from the policy» and to start structural changes in the economy.

Greed of banks

«Look what is happening in the world; look at the movement «Capture Wall Street. » It grows and spreads, it is in the USA, it is in Europe, in Australia, and it is in New Zealand. That is, gradually, not hundreds of people are joining it, but millions.

Moreover, they have quite a clear understanding that all their troubles are connected with only one - the power works on enrichment of the rich, and banks play the leading role in it.

Everyone understands that the crisis that began in 2008 was initiated precisely due to banks, due to their absolutely insatiable greed. And when the banks started to falter, what happened? The government gave them huge money, so they just survived. Moreover, bankers who took retirement, who were guilty, received bonuses for 200 million dollars.

Vladimir Pozner, famous TV journalist

In our time not only reputable banks, but also the world-known firms often behave as petty thieves, aiming to cheat their customers and consumers. They strive to make money by all means, acting on the principle « let it be deluge after us! ». Many goods are intentionally made less reliable and less durable only to earn on spare parts or make customers buy the same things again and again. This wastefulness is absolutely destructive for the environment. The worst thing is that it is done quite consciously. It turns out, the concept of «planned» and «forced obsolescence of things» was developed half a century ago. And not by members of the Club of Rome, but theorists of big business. «Planned obsolescence» - is the production of short-living things. But in order to make people dispose quite good items to the dump, they invented «a forced obsolescence». This is when the hype makes people change models of clothing and shoes, household appliances and automobiles, the list is endless. In our time followers of such waste prevail and succeed. Especially in the leading economic power. According to the data shown in the documentary film «The Story of stuff with Annie Leonard» the lion's share of purchased goods are in the wastes or landfill within six months. As a result, with just 5 percent of the world population, the United States produce 30 per cent of all waste.

Each American today consumes for over eight inhabitants of the Earth. I can only imagine what will happen when the epidemic of consumer idiocy will cover the whole world and all mankind would become nutty wasteful as the notorious «Golden billion». Now millions of people living in developed countries are placed in conditions of senseless exhausting race: they are producing more and more goods to throw them away faster and faster.

Sometimes producers themselves fail to manage this crazy pace, as cost of products catastrophically decrease and the world-known companies with a century-long history are on the verge of bankruptcy. 20 years ago no one would ever thought that a camera with the function of high-quality video can be so cheap. And no one would ever believe that the very existence of such famous companies as «Kodak» and «Olympus» will be under question.

What can we do in this situation? How can mankind get free from this vicious circle? Probably, it is necessary to return what is most lacking. Return love and conscience. Because without love not only a man feels bad, but economy as well. In business today there is neither love nor conscience left. But in the past century everything was! Then the Baker baked his bread and rolls with conscience and sold them with love.

Residents of the neighborhood loved the rolls and loved the Baker. Tailors and shoemakers worked in the same way. In the middle ages they joined in shops and adopted the rules, according to which consumer fraud and unfair competition were severely punished. In addition, they agreed on a quota for release of goods in order not to harm each other.

Our pompous and overweening world should learn morality and cleverness of medieval masters! Why not to develop universal rules of fair play for banks and businesses? Of course, taking into account the interests of customers and consumers. Why not to return love and conscience in the economy? Why not to create the world Association of manufacturers, which would establish quotas for the output of main products, necessarily giving a share of them to newcomers.

It is clear that even the most annoying ads will not make people to change cameras, refrigerators and televisions every month. Therefore real needs can be calculated and we can focus on them. Insanity and extravagance of the market should be opposed by elements of reasonable planned economy. And for those who will be annoyed by the idea of manufacturing constraints, I can say that international quotas are successfully applied in some areas for a long time already. Say, oil extraction and catching fish.

The need for radical change

«Those who have a serious attitude to love, as the only reasonable answer to the problem of human existence, should come to a conclusion about the necessity of important and radical changes in our social structure, if love becomes a public, but not exclusively individual and marginal phenomenon...

Our society is controlled by a managerial bureaucracy, professional politicians; people are under mass hypnotic suggestion, their purpose, or rather goal in itself is to produce more and consume more. All activities are subordinated to the economic purpose, funds are goals, a person is a machine - well-fed, well-dressed, but without any higher interest to typical human qualities and functions. If a person is able to love, he must take his higher position.

Erich Fromm, «Love and its destruction in the modern society »

The most important part of the handwheel which torques insane consumption is advertising. In the U.S. about 3000 advertising materials strikes a person a day. It is estimated that even American children see 20.000 commercials a year. This «engine of trade» is chasing us everywhere: in mailboxes and on the Internet, in the street, in transport, in offices and in private apartments, in press and television. Advertising does not only impose a lot of unnecessary things, but also considerably increases their price. Because it costs a lot of money. For example, in the USA the cost of advertising in one and a half times more than expenses spent on public education! While annual global spending in this area is coming closer to 500 billion dollars!

And all this money is taken not from heaven, but from our own pockets! It turns out that the spread of epidemic of consumer idiocy has to be paid by consumers themselves!

It is impossible to stop this dangerous for the world race and harmonize the economy without radical restrictions of advertising and even a full ban on some of its forms. Why in many countries it is considered illegal and even criminal to impose love to a woman, but it is quite acceptable and normal to impose unnecessary goods? A person must have freedom to choose! Nowadays it can be done with the help of internet. Instead of obsessive psychological pressure in the form of advertising slogans and cyclopean banners, there should be objective information about the product: comparative technical data, test results, advantages and disadvantages, ratings of sales. That is the only way to make sensible choices.

Each good and product must be presented in a special virtual directory, where it can be compared with similar ones. All producers should have equal access to such information. This is especially important for beginners, as it is sometimes difficult to compete with influential corporations, even with the best quality good or product.

The system of informing about movies, performances, exhibitions, books needs to be maintained and expanded, but it must comply with one simple rule – not only one thing should be offered , but several. So we have to make alternative options required to exclude any imposition and give consumers a real choice. Ban prohibition of intrusive advertising will not only significantly reduce the cost of goods and services, but also frees up a tremendous creative power for more productive and useful activities. Of course, in modern conditions prohibition or radical restrictions on advertising seem to be completely unreal. Not only mass media, but even the government depends on banks and big businesses.

Information for reflection

It is established that of 100 largest economies-, 51 are Corporations. They are often annoyed by National governments. Perhaps this is why the idea of creating the world government appeared. Monopolies would like to rule the world undividedly. Nobody should prevent them from pushing our planet into the abyss of a global catastrophe...

It seems that corporations and banks create a great power, and even governments of entire countries can always resist it, not speaking about millions of individual consumers. However, individual citizens are not so powerless, as it seems at first glance. Let's see what is the basis of the power of banks and corporations. What is their way to influence the government and media? First of all it is money! But where does it come from? From millions of ordinary consumers, that means from all of us! So if they all stop buying the products of a Corporation or take their deposits from a Bank, their omnipotence will soon be over.

The world's collective Mind can open people's eyes through the Internet and organize their struggle for their true interests. Then consumers will get a real opportunity to dictate the terms to banks and corporations. The main task is development of a new and more reasonable model of mankind.

###  The Golden age after Apocalypse

Mankind will make a great breakthrough in its development, as soon as people stop lying and stealing. Now lie permeates through all the spheres of our existence, beginning from the state policy and ending with the interpersonal relationships in the family.

Theft is widespread in almost all countries, but in Russia corruption reached really monstrous proportions. Schemes of kickbacks is used quite often , when much of the money allocated, for example, to the construction is spent not on the construction itself, but returns to those officials, who sanctioned this funding.

The scale of the disaster

You cannot imagine the extent of the disaster. You, of course, are familiar with the word «kickback». 5-6 years ago the average kickback in the country was 30%. They cried, but paid. Today it is 70%. I know the case when the kickback was 95%. It is known now all over the country. The country knows, but says nothing, as one part of the population is fed from these kickbacks, and the other (and much larger) is afraid of losing the remaining thirty percent. »

From the open letter of the famous musician Andrey Makarevich to President of Russia Vladimir Putin

The latest disclosure of multibillion-dollar theft causes storm of noble indignation among masses. However, if we are honest before ourselves, we cannot but admit that many of those who resents corruption, are ready to steal if they had a convenient chance! Every fifth worker in Russia drags something from work. And most of the rest don't take anything not because they are very honest, but because they simply have nothing to steal.

Stealing from time immemorial was almost the main national feature in Russia. And the main trouble at the same time. In confirmation of these words, we can quote the author of «the History of the Russian State» by Nikolai Karamzin, who described the situation in Russia only with one word: «Everybody is stealing». Since then little has changed. Recently they started talking about many billions stolen during the construction of objects of winter Olympics in Sochi - the most expensive in the world.

However, in Western countries the situation is far from being ideal. For example, after the war in Iraq there was no banking network there, so the money for reconstruction of the country was sent in cash. It was delivered to Baghdad by aircrafts, and then the packets of notes went to hands. Commission of the US Congress subsequently found that sixty billion allocated for the restoration, twelve disappeared without a trace, that is, there are no even documents confirming their consumption. The British Parliament - later also installed disappearance of eight billion pounds - half of the money allocated by Britain.

In Lithuania immediately after the retrieval of independence in 1991 in the wave of general euphoria and a belief in a bright national future, a great miracle happened: people suddenly stopped stealing from enterprises. The Directors faced unexpected problems: they didn't know what to do with the huge surplus production. However, the rush of people was not supported by the top - greedy elite preferred to seize, so soon « everything got back to previous situation » and it even became worse ... Now in Lithuania often thieves are more sympathized than their victims. It was clearly demonstrated by the experiment, conducted by journalists of one of Newspapers.

They put a good bike in a crowded place near the entrance to a shopping Mall and strapped it with «anti-theft» cable. Then the actor began to pretend to be a thief who was trying to cut the cable. No-one called the police! Moreover, some responsive citizens began to give pseudo-thief tips how to deal with the cable better to steal the bike.

It is quite obvious that we will never be able to fight corruption, while a thief is sitting almost in each of us! The Great Russian writer Anton Pavlovich Chekhov urged to squeeze a slave out from ourselves drop by drop. In the same way we need to squeeze out a thief. But are we able to do it? Is radical change in human qualities possible, as it was dreamed by many bright minds?

We need a quality leap

Only a quality leap in human thinking and behavior can help us chart a new course, having broken the vicious circle in which we found ourselves.

Aurelio Peccei, the founder of «the Club of Rome»

The founder of the Club of Rome believed that this can be achieved by upbringing a «new humanism», including globalization, love to justice and aversion to violence. However, his hopes, alas, were not to be implemented. For 36 years that have passed after the release of the book by Aurelio Peccei «Human qualities», the world has not become better or more honest. Rather on the contrary.

And it is not surprising. In conditions of modern civilization built on lies, it is very difficult to re-educate millions in the spirit of «new humanism». However, many of the famous prophets, including medieval Michel Nostradamus and Bulgarian clairvoyant Vanga, persistently predicted the onset of «Golden age» in the beginning of the third Millennium and appearance of a new, fairer and just society in the near future.

The future belongs to kind people

«The earth is entering a new period of time, which may be called the time of virtues... The future belongs to good people, they will live in a beautiful world which is now difficult to imagine...

Vanga, Bolgarian clairvoyant

But how can it happen? By what miracle our world mired in lies and hatred, can suddenly turn into a Kingdom of goodness and love?

A well-known researcher of ancient civilizations Ukrainian mathematician Igor Manokhin believes that in the coming years our psychic abilities will begin to develop, and we recover telepathic communication between people. That is, cardinal change of the consciousness will happen and EVERY THOUGHT will BE HEARD. Some other researchers believe the same.

If they are right, then after some time we will all be able to read each other's thoughts easily. Then lying and stealing will become simply impossible! Lie detectors will have to be sent to the landfill as unnecessary stuff.

«Everything secret will become known » - as Jesus Christ prophesied. Of course, it will be a terrible disaster for secret services, and to deceitful politicians who denied the opportunity to dissemble, and pull people's legs.

Money will no longer be able to rule the world completely. Business partners will reveal all the cards. Therefore, all the bankers and entrepreneurs will have to play fairly. And not just in business.

Wives will learn about mistresses of their husbands and husbands will open many secrets of their «second halves». For many, living in a lie, it will be a nightmare. Possibly, there will be murders and suicides because of jealousy. But eventually, everything will work out. Family and interpersonal relations will dramatically change, become more honest and open. By the way, some of the most reasonable couples seek to do it now.

Someone would say that the great telepathic enlightenment of mankind will never happen, because it just can't be. But scientists established long ago that a lot of inhabitants on our planet communicate on a telepathic level and have an amazing intuition. Some researchers believe that some people could easily read each other's thoughts. The fact that it is possible in principle was clearly demonstrated by the great extrasensory Wolf Messing and many of his famous colleagues. It is also known that in some stressful critical situation simple people suddenly find telepathic abilities in them. Let's say, military pilots when they were in an extremely dangerous situation. It was telepathic communication that suddenly gave them the saving information. Similarly, intuition helped many people to avoid certain death.

Interaction with higher intelligence

«Man and all that surrounds us are vibrating contours. One wave joins another, synchronization occurs, and thus a person interact with higher intelligence directly receiving information from it. It is called telepathy. We see the example of bees, ants, dolphins that they live by means of telepathic communication. A person fell out of this synchronization at a certain moment. Now we move to restore the telepathic connection of a man with God that was lost many years ago»

Igor Manokhin, mathematician, researcher of ancient civilizations

Military pilots get telepathic abilities as a result of stress, when they were on the verge of death. In the same way a General insight may come after the stress caused by the collapse of the world economy or a global ecological catastrophe. The transition of humanity in the «Golden age» will not happen smoothly and comfortably, but only after a great upheaval.

«Events will turn out unexpectedly... Terrible time will hurtle as a cleansing whirlwind. The difficulty is that many people still do not understand the reason and meaning of everything done on the planet...», - wrote a Russian esoteric philosopher Helena Roerich, often predicting the beginning of a new era, the era of higher consciousness.

The same opinion is written in Holy Scriptures of many religions. According to Gospel, the advent of «Kingdom of God on Earth» - the era of universal love, without lying, stealing, and hypocrisy, will be preceded by Apocalypse. Its main result will be a radical change of the inner world of a man. After all Christ said to Pharisees: «the Kingdom of God is within you». That means that if we change our internal human qualities, stop lying, stealing, start loving one another, and thereby open the Kingdom of God which is within ourselves. Then the «Golden age» of humanity will come!

The word «Apocalypse» is usually associated with the word «catastrophe». Actually, in the Greek language it means opening, disclosure, exposure. Perhaps grandiose revelations of secret diplomatic services of the USA which are shaking now the world is only the beginning, and we are waiting for the great telepathic insight and discoveries of much greater scale...

###  A Creeping ethnic war

It would be very useful for blue-eyed European kids to be given task not only on multiplication and subtraction, but also on degeneracy. So they could count on the calculator in how many years Germany, France and Russia will disappear at the current level of birth rate. Or how soon the Germans and the French will become ethnic minority in their own country. Nominally France and Germany will remain on the map, but only the appearance of their citizens will change a lot. They will become mostly dark-skinned and narrow-eyed. As the dominant religion will be not Christianity. It is known, that already now in London the most popular name for newborn boys is Mohammed.

The decline of Europe, Muslims win

« The nation is usually called dying when its birth rate drops to the level of 1.5 and below. If so, then 30 European countries today are dying or, as in France, their culture and the people are profoundly transformed by growing ethnic and religious minorities. Europe cringes, while in Muslim, African and Asian countries we observe a demographic boom. In 2020 in the world there will be about a billion men of military age, but only 65 million of them will be Europeans. At the same time in Muslim world there will be 300 million of such men, with a very limited field of application of their energy in their countries... In the 20th century the population of Muslims jumped up from 140 million to 1.4 billion».

Gunnar Hainson, professor of Bremen University, historian, sociologist and economist, «Wall Street Journal»

The bankruptcy of the whole continent

«...Young Europeans refuse from giving birth in favor of career and pleasure. For the sake of personal freedom. So gradual extinction of Europoids is a logical consequence of individualist values. Even if they are falsely understood. Personal freedom, almost unbalanced, ended in bankruptcy of the whole continent.

So may be, thanks Goodness? Maybe it is what we, white people, deserve? Once we

« sold our birth rights» exchanged our «Holy Grail» on goodwill for lentil soup, so now we get oblivion and death! »

Elena Schwartz, «Summing up the era of the white man»

Some Europeans do not see anything wrong in the fact that the population of the continent is diluted with foreign newcomers from Asia and Africa and even believe that «fresh blood» is useful, as it contributes to emergence of healthier offsprings. Many others are seriously afraid of the danger of ethnic degeneration. This anxiety is gradually increasing, which is confirmed by growing popularity of nationalist parties in Europe.

In the summer of 2011 the whole world was shocked by insane terrorist act by Andreas Breivik, whose victims were 77 young Norwegians. At the court the killer said that he did it «to save Norway from onset to its culture, traditions and values». The Norwegian shooter grabbed weapon to defend interests of his own people in such a crazy way.

The absurd terrorist attack was directed not against enemies, as he perceived Muslims, but against his own citizens. It is a paradox, but it reflected the essence of the great ethnic war in Europe very accurately. Because in this unusual war European Nations are at war not with the invaders, but with themselves, killing their children and releasing the vital space for foreign invaders. As results of even this terrible terrorist are far from «humane» Norwegian women that have killed (with the assistance of the state!) tens of thousands of unborn babies.Well, speaking about Russian failed mothers of the twentieth century, on the conscience of which there were about 300 million of terminated lives, even Adolf Hitler was not able to compete with them.

Feminists, who organized this unprecedented terror century, may resent such comparison and speak a lot about the rights of women on family planning, but the main point of it does not change. First, because the execution by medical forceps in the womb is unlikely to be more pleasant than a bullet of Norwegian killer or a Nazi gas chamber. And secondly, the result in all cases is exactly the same: death of a European and release of living space for the newcomers.

Earlier in traditional wars territories were captured as the result of bloody battles, but now everything is different. Millions of foreigners occupy European cities without any armed struggle. In the great ethnic war tanks and guns are useless, because the main weapon is love. The winner is the one who gives birth to more children and love them more. This is the thing which Europeans ought to learn from Eastern peoples and Muslims.

The current creeping ethnic war in its consequences is much more dangerous than the great invasion of the Hunns to Europe or Tatar-Mongols on the Kiev Rus. It is known that Byzantium and other European States paid a great tribute to the Hunns dux Attila, and the Russian princes to Batu Khan and his successors. But then it did not threaten ethnic security of Europe- indigenous peoples and their faith was perfectly preserved. Now Europe faces the real danger of extinction of native peoples, their centuries-old culture, and faith.

Unfortunately, narrowness and limitation of thinking of many rulers and generals does not allow them to realize the extent of horrific threat. Generals, as always, continue to prepare for the past war, they are oriented on the past fightings. European States spend crazy money on all new tanks, aircrafts and missiles, which are totally useless in the great ethnic war.

War and demography

The decline of ancient Western civilizations was contributed by catastrophic fall in birth rate. At the same time invasions of the Hunns and the Mongols was preceded by a demographic increase inside these peoples. Wize concern of rulers brought stunning results in increasing birth rate. For example, according to decree of Genghis Khan, in each clan consisting of 40 families, not less than 4 families had to celebrate a wedding a year. In case of poverty of newlyweds, the community helped them financially beforehand, to ease their burden of wedding expenses. If there were less than 4 weddings a year for 40 families, the leader of this clan was punished.

For 800 years France has been the most populated country in Western Europe. It was the main basis of Napoleon's victories. In the beginning of 19th century there were 28 million - almost three times more than the Prussians (10 million) and much more than the British (12 million). Surprisingly, the number of the French was equal to or even slightly exceeded the number of the Russians (excluding Ukrainians and other peoples of the Russian Empire). In the second half of the 19th century German Empire, uniting the Germans, beated France on the size of the population and defeated it in the war of 1870. French Generals and politicians explained destructions and difficulties of France during two world wars of the twentieth century primarily by demographic problems in their country.

A rare example of a non-standard thinking showed the U.S. military on the eve of the Second World War. When after the hungry years of the great depression too frail recruits started to come to the army. American schools on the initiative of generals (!!!) were provided with free lunches.

Following the same logic, the Russian military now have to refuse from some part of a huge military budget voluntarily and to send money to increase the birth rate. After all, in the most likely scenario of demographers, the number of 18-year-olds (the current mobilization reserve) by 2050 will be reduced in Russia by 4 times and will amount a little more than 300 thousand!

The government has already approved two «concepts for demographic development of Russia» (2001 and 2007) and announced that it is ready to spend 1.6 trillion rubles for this purpose for five years , regarding compulsory medical insurance and the budgets of the subjects of the Federation (i.e. in the price they included everything possible). In reality, for 2011-2013 only 876 billion rubles are located for financing demographic policy in the approved Federal budget that is less than 300 billion a year.

In military sphere the authorities of Russia are much more generous. Recently Vladimir Putin announced that in the coming years 20 trillion rubles would go on the Armed forces, and 3 trillion would be spent on development of military-industrial complex. That is, for military purposes it is supposed to spend 15 times more than on children. These are the priorities of the rulers... Judging on concepts and statements by authorities of Russia, they have been seriously dealing with problems of demography for more than ten years. But where are the results? Two figures say about «achievements» most eloquently : in queues to kindergartens there are over two million kids(!!!), and the monthly benefit to take care of a child under 3 years is just 50 rubles, i.e. less than two dollars(!!!). All this is an open mockery of mothers.

Rockets instead of school desks

«Expenses for education will be reduced from 2011- 2014 from 560 billion to 490 billion rubles. The government intends to add money to high educational establishments and kindergartens, but at the same time to reduce expenses for schools sharply (by 1.8 times) and technical schools (by 10 times). The reason for that is partly in transferring of some powers on education financing to regions, but reduction of federal financing can have a negative influence on school reforms. Expenses for health care will be reduced by 9% in comparison with 2011.

Defense costs are now 2.9% of GDP – by nearly 1.5 times more than for education and health care together. In 2014 this parity will be already 3 to 1. There is no such parity in any developed country. In Brazil state expenses for education are more than 5.2% of GDP, for health care – 3.5%, for defense – 1.5%; in China all these indicators fluctuate near 2% of GDP. In the USA they spend on education 5.5% of GDP, for health care – 7.1%, for defense – 4.3%. Medvedev and Putin like repeating that defense innovations will be a locomotive of updating of the whole economy. It is a myth which had been discredited long ago. If during the Cold war (50s, 60s.) this technological transfer used to work in this direction, but it stopped long time ago. Military industrial complex is now rather a recipient of advanced technologies, than its donor. »

«Vedomosty», an editorial article

If in the USA they spend on medicine and education more than on the Army by three times, in Russia, where the threat of ethnic degeneration is much more actual, everything is on the contrary. Not a single serious scientist demographer shares optimism of Russian authorities. The more so, they warn that in the nearest years the situation will be even worse, as the country will face the demographic hole.

But Russian rulers instead of throwing all forces to rescue the country from degeneration are ready to spend trillions on new amounts of weapons. What for? To recreate the empire and start frightening the world again? There will be no empire with such a birth rate anyway! Authorities are exulting about some increase in number of new born babies in Moscow, but for some reason, they just not notice that every third child is of parents' immigrants. The similar situation is in many other capitals of Europe.

The creeping ethnic war is going on. Europeans surrender their capitals without assault. Slowly but surely. We have to stop it somehow. We need a breaking change! Europe can be saved only by radical and not standard decisions, which will ensure a demographic breakthrough.

The main question is how to do it in the way when social help isn't spread for everybody without control, but it is addressed. To make it stimulate birth rate increase of those native European ethnoses, which are being degenerating? It means, figuratively speaking, if white bears are hungry, we need to feed them, but not bears in general. But how to organize it in practice? For example, in Russia, where the problem is the most serious.

We need to adopt a special law urgently « About rescue of ethnos from degeneration », according to which:

• To recognize ethnoses, birth rate of which is less than 1.5 as degenerating.

• The parent capital and children's allowances of representatives of degenerating ethnoses must be doubles or even trebled.

• The half of parent capital must be given to a woman just after the child's birth, even if she, for some reason, will have to refuse it. The nine-month work to bear the child must be certainly paid.

• To carry out a pension reform , in which all pension deductions of children must go directly to their parents , but after their death – to other old people in need.

• To make lunches in kindergartens and schools free of charge. In case when there is no vacant place for a child, parents must get the grant equaled to expenses for one child in a kindergarten.

• To allow and support financially creation of communal and house mini-kindergartens in the place of residence.

• To guarantee free medical service and full education including higher.

Birth of a child must become for his mother not ruinous in terms of money, but profitable. Nobody will throw a new born child to rubbish dump (now it happens quite often), if parents will be given good money for him. Nobody will want to refuse from children if they will be «live pension ». The state must encourage love, but not hatred to children.

Creeping ethnic war is radically different from conventional war by its time frames. In the 30s of the last century the Nazis came to power and managed to raise the economy of Germany and the power of its armed forces for just 5-6 years and already after 7 years they conquered half of Europe. To achieve tangible results in the ethnic war we need at least 15-20 years for the emergence of new, more numerous generations of Europeans. Therefore, unless urgent revolutionary measures are taken in the near future, the situation will become irreversible and it will be already impossible to save Europe.

###  Freedom to young love!

In the nearest decade, when a small generation of 90s becomes adults, Russia will have a horrible demographic hole. It will be connected with significant decrease of number of young women of bearing age. As a result by the middle of 2020 the number of potential mothers will decrease by nearly two times! Many scientists warned of the forthcoming crisis, the director of Institute of Demographic academician Anatoliy Vishnevskiy was among them. However Russian authorities do not want to hear authoritative experts about it. Just like Stalin before the war, they believe only good, but not quite true news about « stabilization » of number of population.

A deep demographic hole

«...Demographic problems made Citigroup to exclude Russia from the number of generators of the world growth (3G»).

«...Demographic situation in Russia is really bad, agrees a demographer Nikolas Aberstadt from American Enterprise Institute, who recently published a report called «Prospects of the world demography and economies ».From 1992 to 2009 for three dead people in Russia there was only two new born. For the last 18 years the population of the country decreased by 7 million, to 142 million people. By 2030 the number of people who are able to work in Russia will decrease by 20% more, but the number of people aged more than 65 will increase from 13% to 21%».

New Moscow News

So, there will be much more retired, but much less young people, and this fact doesn't promise a demographic breakthrough to the country. The situation seems to be absolutely hopeless, and Russia is doomed for ethnic degeneration. Really, within existing frames and notions there is no way out. However we can find it if we refuse from stereotypes we got used to, to change our norms dramatically to bring them into accord with historical experience and laws of physiology.

We must accelerate the maturity of young people and end up with excessively prolonged childhood! The age of legal capacity should be reduced from 18 to 15 years. Half a century ago, with significantly better demographic situation many of the Soviet guys and girls began their working life at the age of 15-16 years. Now it's not uncommon for children to be dependent on their parents until they are 25 years old. Increasing of terms of studying does not improve the quality of education. Rather on the contrary: the learning takes longer but they get less and less knowledge. Modern school curricula are overloaded. They contain a lot of unnecessary ballast, which students are unlikely to use in the future. At the same time, students don't get some vital knowledge.

In Soviet times the famous academician Stanislav Strumilin studied problems of economic efficiency of education and formulated the law of declining productivity of schooling, according to which, with increasing of levels of education its economic effect for the state reduces. The qualification of workers increases slower than the number of years spent on his training. The academician developed methods of determining the optimal period of schooling and sizes of expenditure on education taking growth of national income into consideration.

Russia should use the rich heritage of its own scientists, but not copy irrational European and world educational standards blindly. Now in Europe schooling is stretched to 12 years. Of course, you can stretch it to 20 as well. But it will hardly make students more educated, but certainly will provide an unsustainable financial burden for parents and for the state.

Russia should return to optimal educational standards that existed in Soviet times and introduce compulsory occupational training in schools. By the age of 16 all the guys must have at least some basic specialty. An earlier start of working life will help to solve problems related to population ageing. It is necessary to stimulate the rising generation's desire to earn money on their own and not to be a burden for parents. For that young people should be given more rights and opportunities in other most relevant to them spheres. It is extremely important to allow early initiation of not only employment, but also sexual and family life. You need to use a useful historical experience.

Marriage and growing up

«In a traditional society marriage was actually, and sometimes legally necessary condition for obtaining the status of an adult. In pre-revolutionary Russian village a bachelor, regardless of age, is not «a man», but a «small ». He didn't have a decisive voice in the family, as well as at a village meeting. Hence - early and almost universal marriage. Today the situation is different. »

Igor Kon, «the Sexual revolution of the twentieth century»

That is, in pre-revolutionary village, a married guy, even at the age of 16 could become a «man». In modern Europe many men up to 30-40 years remain «small». More than half of young Russian men aged up to 35 years do not want to create a family.

How to solve this problem? It is necessary to end up with sexual discrimination of the youth! The official age of consent should be lowered to historical and physiological norms of 12-14 years, i.e. to the level determined by nature and experience of many previous centuries. We should not be arrogant to believe that our ancestors were more stupid or less moral than we are. Essentially, you should just legalize what actually exists. Teenagers begin their sexual lives when they want to, not when they are allowed to by presumptuous legislators. Propaganda of abstinence is pointless, which is very clearly shown by a ten-year experience in America, which spent about a billion dollars on it in vain. The youth follows the laws of nature much eagerly than laws established by hypocritical authorities.

It is time to realize that the process of puberty, like the sunrise, is not regulated by any laws. But if the process cannot be prevented, it can be led and sent in a more useful and necessary direction for the country. Moreover, we should create normal conditions for love for the youth, as Wilhelm Reich called in the 30s.

Where to hide alone with a girl?

«...The question that extremely occupies every healthy young man in every corner of the Earth: how to be alone with your girlfriend? There is no doubt that this one issue, i.e. the creation of possibility to be together with the purpose of unobstructed sexual communication would win the youth, as it would certainly feel to be understood. One blow would eliminate a significant manifestation of chaos. After all, if in any quarters of town four thousand young men do not know where they could hug their girls, and then they will do it in the yards and dark corners, disturbing each other, causing jealousy and quarreling. In short, they also create «chaos». But no one, literally not a single existing political organization did not offer a statements in favor of creation of apartments for young people specifically in order to establish free sexual communication».

Wilhelm Reich, «Sexual revolution »

Perhaps Fidel Castro read this book by Wilhelm Reich. Because he's the only world leader who not only realized sexual problems of young people, but helped to solve them. They say that on the island of Freedom there are small houses specially built for love. By the way, Cuba is one of few countries in the world, where, in contrast to Puritan America and not less decorous Europe, sexual deeds of the leader are perceived by people not as a disgrace, but as a subject of his male pride and glory. In response to understanding and care of youth people, they answer Fidel with amazing love and devotion. And this is despite years of economic hardship and political constraints! Perhaps sensual love is really above everything.

Our world is arranged strange and paradoxically: in my youth, when a guy wants and can, he often has no possibilities, and then when he grows up and gains possibilities, he doesn't really want to, and sometimes not able to... the peak of sexual activity of men falls on the period, when they still do not have their own house and by the standards of modern society are «socially immature». When they have their own home and get «social maturity», the peak is already over. In this sense, women are much luckier; - their peak is after 30-35. Therefore, it is difficult for militant feminists to understand men.

However, most of the lawmakers in the countries of Europe and America are men who have usually sexuality above average. So, don't they remember how they suffered from sexual desire at the age of 14-15 and from inability to satisfy it normally? Deputies should feel sorry for their children and grandchildren. We must meet their most essential needs. In the meantime, unfortunately, legislators confirm the old adage by their decisions: «the weaker are parts of the body (penis), the higher is morality». We must honestly admit that politician cannot control physiology and regulate sexual development of young people legislatively.Legal laws must correspond laws of nature, but not contradict them!

What do you call for? To legalization and cultivation of the youth debauchery? – Perhaps indignant advocates of «high», but not too prolific morality will say. Russia has already reached unprecedented levels - 100 early pregnancies per thousand of schoolgirls. Do we need more?

Of course we do! You bet! Authorities should not indignantly exclaim, but only rejoice that in their country young people are so sexually active. After all, they are the hope of Russia! Perhaps even the only hope of salvation from ethnic degeneration. Young «soldiers of love» are the main striking force in the great ethnic war. Unwanted pregnancies should be desirable! Abortion of the first pregnancy, often leading to infertility, should be severely punished. According to many scientists, the so-called «early pregnancy» in physiological terms (i.e. for the health of mother and child) is much better than late and «socially mature». In all last centuries people understood it quite well. But now we put the contrived «morality» above Mother Nature!

The healthiest childbirth

«In those days early childbirths were reasonable; girls gave birth to first children not later than at 15-16 ... the age of menarche (the beginning of menstruation), but then the age was on the range of 12-14 years (Amundsen, Diers, 1969; Bullough, 1981).

And now among modern medical experts many people (including members of Austrian government Commission on the reform of the penal law) were of the opinion that most of the 14-year-old girls are quite ready for giving birth to a child (Graupner, 1997, I, 251, note. 2)».

Verne Leroy Bullo, Professor of California University, «The Age of consent: a historical overview»

These young, but socially immature «soldiers of love» will make us millions of children, but who and how will feed them and educate? «-will probably say some people who don't like this idea. The answer is: all the country should feed and educate them, as it is the country which is threatened by ethnic degeneration. Moreover, Russia has money for that (in contrast to Ukraine and Belarus).

In conditions of the great ethnic war roles should be distributed like that: the patriotic duty of the youth is to give birth to as many children as possible and patriotic duty of the older generation is to help to raise the kids. Of course, with a serious financial support of the state. The constantly growing army of pensioners must join together to solve this problem and make their voices heard. Instead of the old well-known phrase from the times of war «Everything for the front, everything for victory! » should come a new slogan: «All for love, all for children! »

###  A family commune

Revolution of love means revolution of family relations. In response to a catastrophic decline in birth rate in Europe, though, they began to legalize homosexual marriages, which do not solve the demographic problem, but only complicate it. Obviously, such paradoxes are more obvious for the Planet of Idiots than the Planet of Reason ... Natural, though not quite standard, sexual relations are often persecuted. At least, homosexual marriages are officially registered in many countries of Europe and America, but polygamous families are somehow outside the law.

Although, as historical experience shows, such forms of family contribute to raising the birth rate in the past and they already saved Europe from demographic troubles. Why in technique we construct more and more new machines, but in the sphere of personal life we are terribly conservative and do not even try to change or improve forms of the family which are deteriorated and obsolete in many respects.

The issue has matured

«Millions of men nowadays have several wives. These wives are civil, as legally they cannot be registered. The problem is: are we ready to legitimize what already exists? Either the Chinese will live in Russia in 50 years, or we will legalize polygamy. If the choice is between the Chinese and poligamy, I choose polygamy.

Boris Nemtsov, famous Russian politician

Confession of a polygamist

«I have two wives. I am 40, the older wife is \- 39, the younger 28. We have five children- two sons and three daughters. I have been married to the older one for 17years; the younger has been living with us for 11 years. For all this time we have never quarreled. Our children are absolutely healthy. We have built a big house in the country and enjoy life there. We wish everybody the same ».

Aleksey, from responses in «Komsomol Truth »

In most countries polygamous marriages are prohibited. In France one may lose the citizenship. In the Soviet Union any-one who lived with two or more women with the common household could be punished and spend a year in prison. Criminal liability formally was advanced in the case of common household ». Thus, the article in the Soviet Union was not against marriage scams, and against polygamous families. In our time in some Islamic republics of the North Caucasus they tried to legalize polygamy officially.

In the mid-90s the liberal democratic party of Russia was trying to do the same, but the Kremlin has not approved this initiative. However, the discussion taking place in society led to cancellation of criminal responsibility for polygamy. The corresponding article was excluded from the Russian Criminal code in 1996. In fact, you cannot marry a second woman officially without being divorced with the first one. However, there is no punishment for bigamy. Therefore, people in Russia can be more honest than in other European countries, and not hide the true form of their family relations.

Polygamy in Russia

During the all-Russia population census in 2010 they obtained information about so-called polygamous marital unions for the first time. In Russia there are 1616 such families. In Ingushetia - 30, in Chechnya - 75, in Stavropol - 6. Most polygamists live, which is strange enough, in Moscow (732) and in St. Petersburg (382)!

During the census they did not clarify the form of a polygamous family. Because apart from Islamic family, there is also a «Swedish» one, where there are not only many wives, but husbands as well. It largely corresponds to the European standards of gender equality. In addition, such family contributes to birth of healthier offsptings better the Islamic. As it was found out by the School of Botany and Zoology, the Australian national University, women's monogamy and faithfulness, which are considered attributes of moral behavior, are harmful both for the woman and for her potential offsprings. Experiments have shown that women who have several sexual partners will much more likely give birth to healthier children with good immunity.

We will have not Islamic, but a Swedish family

«In Europe polygamy exists de facto. It is called a Swedish family; it is based on the principle of mutual responsibility and once was offered as the only normal alternative to bourgeois marriage with his hypocrisy...»

«In Swedish families life is better emotionally, if to compare to that of a traditional family. There are less nervous break downs, scandals, divorces. But it is only one research. It is a question whether polygamy might become a mass phenomenon. I'm not much of a fanatic compliance with norms. A human being has got one need- to realize that he corresponds to a common stereotype, doesn't break out of all , but it is just not a basic one.

You can somehow agree with yourself. As practice shows, sexual and psychological comfort is more important than norms. Therefore the norm can be thrown away if it appears that for children, for example, it is easier to grow in such a large and free family».

Maxim Levi, psychologist, magazine «Little flame »

Because the Swedes themselves strongly deny any involvement in «Swedish family», taking Russian traditions into account, a Swedish family could be called a polygamous family community that would be more correct. A little bit different Patriarchal family communities were spread in Russia and in many European countries until the early twentieth century. They were built according to the vertical principle of the representatives of three generations. The common household was more rational, and the total expenses for food were cheaper. Officially polygamy was not there, though sex contacts were not uncommon. Say, daughter-in-law with the father-in-law or mother-in-law with the son-in-law...

Polygamous family community is actually a family of a new type. Unlike Patriarchal family community it is built not on a vertical, but on a more democratic- horizontal principle, i.e. peer couples and singles. Polygamous family community does not cancel individual love and the usual weddings of couples with honeymoons. But we know that with the end of the period of passionate love, family problems come. Usually after a birth of a baby or the occurrence of a love triangle. As a result, families often perish. It would be reasonable if in case of any difficulties and problems a young family doesn't break up, but, on the contrary join with other similar couples and divorced single people into a big polygamous community.

Indeed, many problems could be solved easier there. Say, after the wedding wife usually wants her husband to pay more attention to the family, but not to friends. The husband, in turn, is irritated by talkative friends of his wife. Thus, in a traditional family man often does not have enough communication with friends and the woman - with girlfriends. As the result discontent is accumulating and the tense is increasing.

In a polygamous family community there will be no such problems, as both men and women can easily communicate in their circle. In a polygamous family domestic violence will disappear, or at least will be reduced to a minimum, because there will be someone to intercede and to slow down the «aggressor». Cooking will also stop being a daily headache. You will agree that today dinner is cooked by one family, tomorrow by another. They will do it turn, or those who like it more and who does it best. The same is with upbringing of children.

Now a young family often can't go anywhere because of the child, as they have nobody to look after him. In a polygamous community children will be much happier with their peers, and the life of parents will be easier. Kids will be looked after in turn, or it will be entrusted to someone, who likes it more. Lonely people will also find their place there. You can organize a mini-kindergarten. A joint upbringing of children is more rational, more effective and much cheaper. This polygamous family community may exist in several apartments on one floor of in big house, or they can occupy a mansion somewhere outside the city. Of course, everyone should have a room of his own. Approximately the same are the principles of living in communes now in France, Germany and Italy, even though they are not family communities.

The ideal is a polygamous family community, built on principles of polyamory that means that there is love to each other. The revolution of love should strive to this! Of course, as in traditional monogamous families, in the family community anything can happen. We must understand that there is no place without problems. The main task of the family community is to save monogamous families from disintegration by uniting them on a new basis. Therefore, Russia and other European countries should legalize polygamous marriages. Family community should become a legitimate form of a family!

Loneliness – is an abnormal way of life

«Polygamous relations essentially change definition of a family, but it is a very revolutionary step. Perhaps it has the right to life in the case of Americans and Westerners, because in that form, in which family exists now it's not very functional or stable. More and more people live absolutely alone. A person should not live alone. I think in the US now about 30% of all people live all alone. They are short of communication emotionally and physiologically –it is an abnormal way of life».

Dr. Lina Wolfe, sexologist

Every person has the right to choose. Not only in politics, but also in personal life. In Europe there must be full freedom of love and family relations. Nothing must be imposed! Let everyone decides how to live. For someone a traditional monogamous family is better, for others it is more interesting and pleasant to be in a polygamous one. Some may choose complete loneliness themselves. In the same way should be built relationships with children. Each mother or a couple should have the choice to bring up the child themselves or entrust it to the state. If they choose the second, no one should blame them.

Elite education

«A great scientist Stanislav Gustavovich Strumilin developed the conception, according to which women remained only a function of birth giving to children, then the children must be taken away from their parents and be brought up in nurseries, kindergartens, schools, colleges and universities. Actually there is nothing absurd in such a system of education. Elite was always educated like that ...»

Vladislav Galetskiy, «Will the institution of family meet the 22nd century? »

Indeed, the great Pushkin and many other geniuses, who glorified Russia, were not brought up in families but in lyceums. Communication with peers and talented instructors gave them far more than contacts with mom and dad. We need to create necessary centers for children in each city with conditions not worse than in a family. And do not say that it is better not to create children's homes, as they only create child offenders. In Russia the police, to put it mildly, are not ideal and many citizens it is scarier than bandits, but nobody demands to close post and police stations on this basis. The most important is not a form, but quality. If we do it with reason and love, everything can be done at the highest level!

There are a lot of bright, intelligent and sincere people in Russia. The growing army of pensioners will be happy to help. Because now different generations have little communication among themselves and it is bad for everybody. It is necessary to find the way for seniors to give their love and care to kids, everybody who wants must have a chance to take part in upbringing and education of the younger generation.

Now, many people face an unpleasant choice: to live in lie or destroy the family. The revolution of love wants to give people a better alternative. Authorities are not entitled to introduce legislation on love! Why in European countries it is officially allowed to love only one woman or one man but not two or three? Because so many people love it like that. There should be a variety of family forms. We must cancel any prosecution for viripotent love! Only violence and coercion must be punished. All convicted of viripotent love without violence must be released. Love is the greatest happiness and the state should not limit it!

###  The role of Russia

Russia takes the first place in the world in terms of absolute population decline and like any other country, needs a Revolution of Love and demographic breakthrough. Not only mothers, but the state is guilty as 300 million lives have been terminated for half a century! We ourselves have pushed us into a demographic hole! To be saved from ethnic degeneration Russia should mobilize all its resources on demographic breakthrough, but not to the new round of the arms race.

Information to think over

Russia will soon be the third in the world in military spending. On the level of servicemen's wages it is already the third. At the same time, concerning living standards the country ranks only 62 place, for expenditures of the state to a person - 72, income per capita- 97, and ' health state of population – the 127 place(!!!)

For many States military spending is the priority. But how effective are they? Hardly anyone has studied it seriously. As history shows, a large part of forts and fortresses, in its time enormous sums were spent on the construction of which, never played the appointed role. Here are just a couple of Russian examples.

Fortress of the first class in Kovno (now Kaunas) was constructed from 1879 to 1915. The most modern forts were erected there, where they used electric lighting for the first time, sewerage, embrasure valves, forced ventilation, cork wall cladding (!!!) to reduce impact from the sound wave from explosions and many other technical innovations. This fortress was unique because it even had its own railway network with a length of more than 20 kilometers. You can imagine what money it all costs. And that miracle of fortification technique, which was constructed for over 35 years, only once in the First World War delayed the German troops for only 10 days (!!!).

Approximately in the same period a similar fortress was built in Vladivostok much faster because they used the most modern equipment up to the system of overhead cable cars and heavy German trucks by company «Benz». The head, by the way, was sent there from Kovno, where he managed to win three awards for the construction.

For erection of forts in Vladivostok cement, of a special fortification brand, was especially delivered by ships of the Voluntary fleet in sealed metal tubs from a faraway Black Sea Novorossiysk (!!!). It is possible that budget was appropriated in such an extravagant way. Minister of Finance of Russia count Kokovtsev stated: «...we shouldn't save money on Vladivostok ». Millions of rubles in gold were spent on the construction of the forts. It was absolutely pointless. As the fortress was not to meet its enemies, did not keep anybody away even for a day was eliminated in 20s. It is highly symbolic that the town of builders of the fortress is still there, not too comfortable «outhouses» properly serve as housing for over a century!!! At least some benefits to the people from the spent Golden millions...

The fate of Old Russian fortresses was repeated by hundreds of Soviet military bases. Abandoned silos, concrete bunker going deep into the earth, many kilometers of half- drowned tunnels can be found in all corners of Russia. Billions of people's money was buried in the ground. Other billions, spent on tank Armadas can be added here, chemical weapons, which now requires expensive and hazardous disposal, and countless amount of ordnances, which regularly and suddenly explode in one or another armory.

Some would say that all these costs were not in vain, that they ensured the country's security. Suppose it did. Well, why then nobody attacked and captured dozens of other countries, which spent much less money than we did on weapons and much more on their people? Russia for the last 20 years was much weaker than the USSR, but somehow survived. Poor Afghan's armed forces are fairly modest, but nobody could conquer this country. Even the most modern and powerful armies in the world. From all this it is necessary to make conclusions and to change priorities. Excessive arms race ruined the USSR. It may destroy Russia as well. We should not make the same mistakes twice. Is it worth to sacrifice the welfare of the nation and its future, embodied in children, for the sake of Imperial ambitions?

Maybe we should stop these sacrifices? Strengthening of national security is understood in Russia in a one-side way. Mainly as a strengthening of the power structures, struggle against espionage and creation of new types of weapons. Modern generals and officials should learn wisdom from their famous predecessors. In the 20s the head of security of Soviet Russia Felix Dzerzhinsky was working hard on problem of homeless children, knowing that children are one of the most important components of national security. But why don't we really understand that now? Why don't we notice, that the Great ethnic war is already going on?

All Russian people need to realize that violence, hatred to aliens and even overlapping of boundaries (as it was suggested by one of the candidates to presidents of Russia) will resolve nothing! Everyone should understand that the most effective weapon in the great ethnic war is Love! First of all, to our people and to our children! First of all it is necessary to spend all trillions on them! But not on the new iron for murders. To solve demographic problem and achieve full understanding of generations it is necessary to abandon outdated stereotypes, everything «indecent» must be made decent and even cult. Colossal sexual energy of the youth should be directed in useful for the country course.

The energy of freedom

«The person, who will manage to develop a convincing aesthetics of the youth's «goddamned patriotism», will be immortalized in a monument at life time next to Lenin and Peter the Great in all Russian cities, because he will do much more for Russia than Kurchatov and Korolyov together. That's what patriotically-minded artists, musicians, filmmakers should think about today.

Any ass can chant militarism and majesty, but try to interbreed patriotism with the deepest, most intimate desires of the human soul. While patriotic enthusiasm is deployed in the modus of castration and fastness with all buttons, we do not expect any special success. The current semi-official propaganda is just a decoration of a dead body: they say only good things about him, wash, and dress in a strict neat jacket.

For continuation of life we need a different thing, we need not pursue energy of orgasm, energy of freedom and liberation into Russian ideas. Then we will become invincible, then not we, but they will be afraid of our masscult and hide behind the iron curtains».

Center of Slavic gender studies «Svjatevit»

In Social network Gide park (gidepark.ru) to the question «do we Need Russian communities? » exactly half of the respondents replied positively. And 42 percent believe that «Formation of Russian communities is inevitably - only they will be able to improve life in Russia and ensure its civilized development», and 8 percent are of the opinion that « Formation of communities is desirable - they will help restore order and overcome urgent problems».

Of course, the survey didn't mean polygamous families. However, it is important that a strong enough desire of people to unite in the community was recorded. It means that suicidal individualism of the West has not ingrained in the country.

It happened that Russia can become the main hope of Europe, show it the example and even to lead the counter-attack in the great ethnic war. London, Paris and many other European capitals are already almost half -captured by foreigners. Europeans strangle themselves with their own laws. Their, brought to absurdity, political correctness actually promotes ethnic degeneration of indigenous peoples of the continent. In Russia the epidemic consumer idiocy is not so wide-spread, juvenile justice is not as strong, as well as excessive tolerance towards newcomers. People in Russia are still not as rational and soulless as people in the West. Therefore, Russia can be the place where Revolution of Love can appear and spread throughout Europe and worldwide.

The famous Bulgarian prophet Vanga predicted that spiritual cleansing begins from Russia. Russia's special role was foreseen by other great seers and prophets as well. Among them was the famous American predictor Edgar Cayce, who foresaw the Great depression in the U.S., the year of the beginning of the Second World War and the year of collapse of the USSR.

Russia is a hope of the world.

«The world links its hope with Russia ... With hope that everyone will live in love with your neighbour! ».

Edgar Cayce

Edgar Cayce saw the mission of Slavic peoples in changing the nature of human relationships, freeing them from coarse material passions and restoring on new principles - based on love, trust and wisdom.

Of course, now the predictions of Vanga and Edgar Cayce may seem absolute absurd. Indeed, how can Russia in its current condition become a guiding light for all humanity? What example of trust can give the country, where the amount of bribes almost exceeds the state budget? What kind of love to teach, if the number of homicides per 100 thousand of population is approximately 5 times higher than in America, and almost 20 times more than in European countries?

The ability to be terrified of yourself

«According to many indicators, Russia is not in Europe, and not even in Asia: judging by the level of corruption, life expectancy, the level of investment in science and other similar things — we are in Africa! I will tell you even more — we are not to get offended for such comparison, but Africans are! Africans have explanations of their backwardness: they were mercilessly exploited and exterminated by «newcomers » for four centuries — racists and colonizers , but we, Russian people, who has colonized us for the last four centuries , who has humiliated us apart from ourselves ?

Annually Russia loses a whole region like Pskov, speaking about population; it is like a big town like Krasnodar.

The number of suicides, poisonings, homicides and accidents in Russia is comparable to the level of mortality in Angola and Burundi.

In life expectancy of men Russia is the 160th in the world, being behind Bangladesh. For the last ten years 11.000 villages and 290 towns have disappeared in Siberia».

No matter how tragic it is , I think that obviously it is not the limit , the situation is not the worst , we haven't touched the «bottom» yet , the people is not mature enough to be able to get terrified of themselves and , at last , to get brave enough to ask «where are we living?».

Andrey Konchalovskiy, famous Russian film producer

But paradoxically, the immersion depth of today's Russia in the cesspool of hatred and injustice can give the most powerful incentive for cleansing and movement in the opposite direction. Because the heavier and intolerable the shackles are- the more one wants to get rid of them! The more hatred around - the more I want to love! The more dirt - the more cleanliness one wants!

Already many people in Russia realize that this is the edge, that the country has reached its limit, that further development in this state is unthinkable. And it gives us hope that Russia will be able, in the end, not only to be cleaned and transformed, but also to show an example to other countries. The revolution of Love can be the beginning of a new cultural Renaissance and return of European civilization to classical ideals of Beauty and Harmony.

###  The world reason instead of the world government

Conspiracy theorists frighten the humanity by the world government, which, allegedly, was organized either the masons, or the Illuminati, or the «Committee of 300». The list can be continued. Quite often Bilderberg group and the Club of Rome are mentioned. They are two completely different organizations, which are very different from each other, both in composition and format of their activities.

Bilderberg group or Bilderberg Club was founded in 1954. Its structure is built on the principles of Masonic lodges and includes three circles. The outer circle – an active group of people which unites 383 people. The members of this circle know only a part of real strategy, and the true goals of the organization. The second circle is much more closed – the management Committee (Steering Committee), consisting of 35 people. The narrowest is the circle of Advisory Committee, consisting of about ten people. Among permanent members of Bilderberg group were known financiers and politicians. Among them Edmund de Rothschild, David Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Paul Wolfowitz, Henry Kissinger.

Opponents of Bilderberg Club in Europe and the US see in it what they want: Zionist conspiracy, a secret sect, with megalomania and even the world government. These conclusions are often supported by quotation from the speech of David Rockefeller, which he made in the 90s.

On the way to the world government?

«We appreciate the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other major periodicals, whose Directors attended our meetings and respected their promise to keep confidentiality for nearly forty years. It would be impossible to develop our plan for the world if it was disclosed in that time. But now the world has become more complicated and it is ready to go towards the world government. The supranational Supreme power of intellectual elite and bankers of the world is undoubtedly more preferable than national self-determination, which was in practice in the past centuries».

David Rockefeller, banker and globalist

Bilderberg Group holds annual conferences in various cities around the world. In mysterious semi-secret mode about 120-130 participants get together there, among them there is a number of invited members of the club. As a rule, they are influential people in politics, business and finance, as well as heads of leading Western media. They receive special invitations. From Russia in different years invitation were sent to politicians Anatoly Chubais and Grigoriy Yavlinsky, political scientist Lilia Shevtsova and oligarch Alexei Mordashov.

The conferences of Bilderberg group are not advertised and materials are not published anywhere. However, we know that there they discuss oil prices and energy issues, politics and armed conflicts, problems of the environment and global climate changes. Some sources state that « strategic decisions on key issues of financial, military and social politics, leaving behind governmental bodies of the leading countries of the world. »

Conference of Bilderberg Group

«The conference is in an informal, relaxed atmosphere in which those who have influence on national politics and international Affairs may become closer to each other and discuss common problems without commitments. After each conference an informal meeting report is made, which is distributed exclusively among past and present participants. In the report the speakers are identified only by their country. International organizing Committee usually takes different delegates every year.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Despite the fact that the Bilderberg Club consist of very influential politicians and financiers, it can hardly be considered as the Council of the sages, performing function of the world reason. Intellectuals, experts and people of science in it are poorly represented. Perhaps this is why in the late 60s in Europe an idea was born to unite bright minds in science to solve the most urgent problems of the world development. So the Club of Rome appeared.

Its creation was initiated by Aurelio Peccei, an Italian industrialist, the member of the board of directors of firms «Olivetti » and «Fiat », the Chairman of the Committee of the Atlantic economic cooperation. The activity of the club started in 1968 with a meeting at the Academia Dei Lincei in Rome that is where the name of the public non-profit organization comes from. The Headquartered are in Paris. The club of Rome doesn't have a staff and formal budget. Its activities are coordinated by an Executive Committee which comprises of 12 people. Membership is limited not only by the number - no more than 100 people, but also on the status. As a rule, members of the governments may not simultaneously be members of the Club of Rome. Besides actual there are still associated and honorary members. Among them - the former President of the USSR Mikhail Gorbachev. More than 30 national associations of the Club of Rome promote his ideas and concepts.

Unlike Bilderberg group holding their conferences in conditions of mystery and semi- secretive, the Club of Rome is open, publishes its reports in millions of copies and strongly promotes its activities. Originally one of its major tasks is to attract international attention to global problems. The Club of Rome makes extensive researches on a wide range of issues. Special attention is paid to socio-economic sphere.

In its work members of the Club of Rome were among the first who started using global computational modeling. It should be noted that researchers enjoy complete freedom and independence. To ensure objectivity and impartiality the Club of Rome only defines the topic of the report and guarantees financing of scientific research, but influences neither the work in progress, nor its results and conclusions. The ready report is considered and approved at the annual conference, as a rule, in the presence of representatives of the public, scientists, politicians and mass media. Then it is published and discussed in various classrooms and around the world.

In the assets of the members of the Club of Rome there are a lot of interesting works. The book by Jay Forrester «Global dynamics» (1971) has convincingly proved that further development of mankind on physically limited planet Earth will lead to environmental catastrophe in the 20s of the next century (that is already quite soon). This theme was continued by the project of Dennis Meadows «Limits of growth» (1972).The report of Jan Tinbergen «Revision of international order» (1976), was dedicated to reconstruction of the world economy structure.

New geo-strategic forces and new priorities were discussed in the report of the President of the Club of Rome, Alexander King, and the General Secretary Bertrand Schneider - «the First global revolution» (1991). Unprecedented interest all over the world was caused by the report of the Club of Rome «Factor four. Costs - half, profit - double» (1995). There the authors of the report Ernst Ulrich von Weizsacker, Amory Block Lovins and L. Hunter Lovins proved that humanity can live twice as rich, consuming only half of the resources». With a reasonable approach high living standard and a careful attitude to natural resources are perfectly combined and do not contradict each other . After the book was first published in 1995, the government of the Netherlands and Germany, and then the European community took the described ideas as a basis for sustainable development.

The first President of the Club of Rome was its founder an Italian Aurelio Peccei. After his death in 1984 the Club was headed by an American, Alexander King, then a Spaniard Ricardo Diez-Hohlaytner. Now the President of the Club of Rome is a Hindu Ashok Cosla. The Club of Rome continues researches of the modern world, but not on the scale that it used to do. In the current century the reports are hollowing out and no longer cause a big public resonance.

In 2008 the Club of Rome in collaboration with many scientific and educational organizations, developed a new three-year program «A New Path for World Development ». It outlines its activities until 2012. Despite the huge amount of science and advocacy work, the Club of Rome could not radically change the vector of the world development and get the support of the rulers of the leading countries. The problems, which were written about more than 30 years ago and were written by the founder of the Club of Rome Aurelio Peccei, still remain relevant nowadays.

We need a new course

«Problems of demography, unemployment, insufficient use of social and economic possibilities of the society, deficit and irrational management of resources, inefficiency of the taken measures, inflation, lack of security and arms race, pollution and destruction of the biosphere, marked today human impact on climate and many other problems, locking to each other, like tentacles of a giant octopus, are all over the planet. The danger is so great and real that to take it away and to improve the existing situation we can only with concerted coordinated efforts of all countries and peoples. But still, despite all warnings no effective measures were taken to overcome at least one of these problems. Meanwhile, the number of unresolved issues is growing, they become more complicated, the plexus of them is more messy, and their «tentacles» are gripping our planet in their vices with increasing force ».

«Only a qualitative leap in human thinking and behavior can help us chart a new course to break the vicious circle in which we found ourselves».

Aurelio Peccei, «Human qualities», from the Preface to the first Russian edition

Modern barbarians

«Triumph development of Western civilization is steadily approaching the critical border... And if we want to curb the technical revolution now and guide humanity to its decent future, we must first of all think about changing the person.

Science and appliances based on it have achieved truly gigantic success, however, the science of humanity, morality and society is lagging behind. And has human wisdom become better than in the days of Socrates? »

«Power without wisdom has made us modern barbarians, possessing enormous power, but do not having the faintest idea how to implement it. In an effort to ensure exclusively own comfort and well-being of the current generation often thoughtlessly and indiscriminately rob and litter the Earth.

I keep repeating that today for material, as a rule, short-term benefits we often sell ethical and moral values, science is sold, which is forced to serve the interests, desires and prestige only of the most wealthy and influential people, and enabled some selected groups of humanity reap the fruit of all the detriment at the expense of the others and the future generations».

Aurelio Peccei, « The Human Quality», 1977

What has changed since there lines were written? Has the situation become better? No, it hasn't. It has become even worse! Over the past 30 years, every resident of the economically developed countries began to produce twice more garbage! But has it made him twice happier? I don't think so. On the contrary, because of the pollution of the environment people's health has become worse dramatically. Now it is clear for the Great mind of the Universe: the planet of idiots, which mired in its own waste and endless political squabbles, is not able to save itself from the obvious global threat. The rulers of the world's leading countries have failed to get up to the proper level of mind, will and coordination.

Members of Bilderberg group and the Сlub of Rome at different times in various forms were in favour of establishing the world government. However, this does not mean that these public organizations really rule the world, as it is claimed by their opponents. Because scientific reports of the Club of Rome are not governmental directives. Even a medium-mind person can understand that through annual conferences they can only coordinate positions and discuss relevant issues, but can't not rule our complicated and contradictory world. But even if we assume that the secret world government actually exists, we will inevitably have to admit: it is extremely helpless and incapable of solving any serious problems.

Over the past half century, the world has become much more difficult. Requirements to leaders are now much higher, but their human qualities in the last decade did not increase, but even, on the contrary, decreased significantly. Universal degradation affected political elite as well. Figures like Roosevelt, Churchill, Stalin or General De Gaulle are hardly seen among modern rulers. Titans of thought have almost gone.

But for right decisions it is necessary to use the widest possible approach and consideration of all problems in complex. Now, unfortunately, few people can do it. A huge bureaucratic staff of advisors doesn't help very much. Scientists and experts have quite a narrow specialization. Besides, as it was correctly stated by the founder of the Club of Rome, modern science is often like a « prostitute», i.e. it is adjusted to interests and whims of big business and authorities, giving results which are close not to the truth, but to the opinion of influential people. Government experts, as a rule, are the most loyal, but, alas, not always the most competent.

As far as the rulers are concerned, discrepancy of many of them to requirements of time is explained by the fact that modern system of selection of leaders is hopelessly outdated and is focused on nomination of the most ambitious, but not the wisest. Briefly the essence of the problem can be formulated as: WHO CAN, DOES NOT KNOW WHAT to DO. But THE one WHO KNOWS WHAT to DO CAN DO NOTHING... Politicians have power, but no ideas, thinkers have ideas but they have no power. This is disastrous paradox for the planet! It is impossible to overcome it through creation of the «Open government» or «Public councils ». Because only some the best are attracted to the expert councils, but the most part of bright minds still remains behind. And the «open government» creates only illusion of participation of people and in fact has little impact on actual Ministers.

In principle, is it really possible to attract all the best scientists and experts, wishing to contribute to the progress of humanity? It is quite possible! And not only them, but also other talented people without degrees, as there are a lot of them in each country. After all, sometimes even children are able to offer very interesting solutions, and no adults can guess about. Modern techniques allow to combine their efforts. With the help of the Internet you can create a Virtual World Mind that would act openly, unlike the allegedly existing secret world government. Only then it will be possible to attract millions of talented people for «brainstorming» and overcome the most urgent problems of mankind.

Now under the guise of democracy there is often hidden dictatorship of the bureaucracy and business. The power of mind should come to its place. The Internet can become an effective tool of new democracy. The reality of Association of bright brains of mankind is convincingly proven by the tremendous success of the international network project WikiLeaks and Edward Snowden, who blew up the world by publications of secret documents. Now it is time to move from sensational revelations of our deceitful world to building of another society: open, intelligent and honest.

###  Afterword

The current era of mad consumption has not increased the level of happiness even of the «Golden billion», but it inexorably pushes mankind to unprecedented environmental disaster, and self-destruction. This era will soon end with a global economic collapse, which will bring a lot of troubles and sharp drop in living standards. However, it is the reason not to despair, but to rethink of our being. There are pluses even in a global collapse. For only it will force humanity to change the vector of development and to escape from self-destruction. Because we ourselves and our rulers are not able to do so consciously on our own. Therefore, God simply does not have any other way to teach our crazy world.

The great intelligence of the Universe worries about our planet more than we do. It didn't let us start a nuclear war; it doesn't allow humanity to fly beyond the Solar system and prevents the development of Mars and the Moon. Because people are too vicious, aggressive and dangerous. We desperately need love, not only to each other, but also to our own planet. The messenger of the heavens, Jesus Christ tried to teach people to love even his enemies, but everything was in vain. Millions of Christians pray God only in words, but really worship mammon.

The path to true happiness lies not through reckless consumption, but through awakening of our souls and development of the best human qualities. The brightest minds have been talking about it, but who is listening to them? The peoples of Europe - the cradle of modern civilization – were the first to set foot on the path of self-destruction. It is time to understand - the salvation of Russia and Europe from ethnic degeneration is in love, not hatred!

People often suffer, because they live in a lie and in contradiction with the laws of nature. The revolution of Love should lead to radical changes in interpersonal relations and make us happier. We all have to change, and prove that the Earth is a planet of Mind and Love, but not dangerous angry idiots. Only then the Great knowledge and secrets of the Universe will open to us!

Letters to the author

«You deeply and accurately analyze many of "their" problems and offer interesting solutions. Your manuscript must see the world in one way or another. .

You tell "them" such things in the face that I honestly can't imagine who in the West could undertake publication of such a daring and frank work.

Your book is really interesting and profound, but, I think, that is the reason why it would be extremely difficult to publish it in a traditional way ».

Rina, a literary agent, Great Britain, London

«You have collected interesting information and presented it quite convincingly ... It will be quite difficult to publish the book in Europe.

Michail, France, Paris

«In our opinion, you write an absolute truth. And your literal agent is absolutely right- nobody will publish it ».

Leonid, Germany, Halle

Your opinion of the book can be sent to the author Arseniy Sobolevskiy to the e-mail address: arssob@gmail.com

The author of the book is ready to give lectures.

Your suggestions can be sent to arssob@gmail.com

Money for research can send in PAY-PAL to s-kultura@bk.ru

The author found some distortion within translation and editing.

He will be grateful to anyone who can help identify such errors

All comments should be sent to the author and the publisher - ISKIS

to arssоb@gmail.com or s-kultura@bk.ru

Russian original text presented on the site

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/404696

**EXPLANATION:**

**White square on the first cover page symbolizes white European race, and emptiness means its degeneration ...**
