Another answer is nuclear power, which is
much less controversial in China because of
its prodigious demand for electricity--and
the inability of its people to mount any real
challenges to the government’s plans.
Mainland China currently has 31 nuclear power
reactors in operation, and another 24 under
construction.
Compare this to the United States, which has
99 commercial reactors overall, supplying
about 20% of its electricity needs.
However, the US currently has plans to build
just five more reactors--as it’s instead
choosing to embrace natural gas, wind and
solar power.
Even France -- who leads the world by generating
3/4 of its electricity from nuclear -- is
moving away from the technology, and will
likely close nearly half its nuclear power
plants in the next decade.
The Fukushima accident in Japan, after the
devastating earthquake there, also accelerated
the world’s break up with nuclear power,
even causing China to briefly suspend new
projects.
But while the rest of the world turns its
back on nuclear energy, China is doing the
opposite, more than quadrupling its nuclear
capacity by 2030.
The marquee project is the Haiyang Nuclear
Power Plant in Shandong province, which will
eventually house eight AP1000 Westinghouse
pressurized water reactors for a total capacity
of 8,800 MegaWatts--four times more power
than is generated by the Hoover Dam, a power
station that provides electricity for 8 million
people in the American Southwest.
And when you factor in that the average home
in China uses a fraction of what an American
home uses, the Haiyang plant will end up producing
enough electricity for tens of millions of
people.
But the $13 billion project is only the most
powerful of the 13 different nuclear power
plants currently under construction across
China--nine of which will have a maximum capacity
of more than 6,000 MW.
Most are near large cities where power is
needed most, but this strategy raises concerns
that if there were an accident, tens of millions
of residents could be exposed to dangerous
radiation.
The neighboring Guangdong and Ling Ao nuclear
power plants have 28 million people within
a 75-kilometer radius, including Hong Kong.
That’s many more than the 8 million who
live within 75-kilometers of the San Onofre
nuclear generation station in Southern California,
but the decision was taken in 2013 to shut
the California plant down after numerous safety
concerns became known to the public--highlighting
the opposite directions the two nations are
heading in when it comes to nuclear power.
The other issue China must deal with is how
to dispose the many tons of radioactive waste
it will be generating, which is always a contentious
issue because no one wants that in their backyard.
The current plan is for construction to commence
in 2041 on a high level waste repository site
in the Gobi Desert.
On the whole, the danger of a costly nuclear
accident that China would pay for in both
blood and treasure is fairly significant,
but Beijing is apparently willing to live
with that risk, judging by its unrestricted
embrace of nuclear power.
But these are tough choices, and it’s important
to keep in mind that in the age of climate
change and ecological interconnectivity, nuclear
power is still an infinitely cleaner alternative
to burning coal.
I hope you liked this video, and if you did,
hit that like button to help it spread.
Until next time, for TDC I’m Bryce Plank,
and as usual, thanks for watching.
