WANTS THIS DONE BY THE END OF 
THE MONTH FOR OBVIOUS REASONS.
JOHN.
>> THE HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN IS 
RESCINDING TO THE GUIDANCE 
SAYING THIS IS NOT A STATES 
RIGHT ISSUE IT'S A CIVIL RIGHTS 
ISSUE AND THEREFORE IN THE 
PURVIEW OF THE FEDERAL 
GOVERNMENT.
>> WE'VE GOT TO THIS GUIDANCE 
WAS ENJOINED LAST AUGUST.
IT HASN'T BEEN ENFORCED.
THERE WAS NO COMMENT PERIOD BY 
ANYONE, BY THE HUMAN RIGHTS 
CAMPAIGN, BY TEACHERS, PARENTS, 
STUDENTS, NOBODY HAD ANY INPUT 
ON IT.
IT SEEMS TO ME A LITTLE 
INTERESTING IF THIS WAS ANY 
OTHER ISSUE PEOPLE WOULD BE 
CRYING FOUL THAT THE PROCESS 
WASN'T FOLLOWED.
THE REALITY IS THAT WHEN YOU 
LOOK AT TITLE NINE IT WAS 
ENACTED IN 1972, THE IDEA THIS 
WAS EVEN CONTEMPLATED ON THAT, 
BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT THE 
PRESIDENT DOESN'T UNDERSTAND THE
CHALLENGES THAT CHILDREN FACE, 
AS WITH THE OTHER ISSUES WE HAVE
TALKED ABOUT, WE ARE A STATES 
RIGHTS PARTY, THE PRESIDENT 
BELIEVES IN THESE VARIOUS ISSUES
BEING STATES RIGHTS, I DON'T SEE
WHY THIS WOULD BE ANY DIFFERENT.
IT'S THE LEGAL BASIS ON WHICH IT
WAS ORDER.
IT FELL SHORT ON A LOT OF STUFF.
IT WASN'T US THAT DID THIS.
IT WAS THE COURT THAT STEPPED IN
AND SAID THEY HAD N'T FOLLOWED 
THE LETTER OF THE LAW.
>> DOES THE WHITE HOUSE DISAGREE
WHETHER IT'S A CIVIL RIGHT?
