Well, common sense is useful for certain things.
And of course from an evolutionary perspective
common sense arose to stop us from being eaten
by lions on the Savannah, but not to understand
quantum mechanics.
There's no sense in which our brains, the
early evolution of our brains, needed to know
anything about quantum mechanics or relativity.
And what's amazing is that nevertheless those
brains that arose to solve human problems
on everyday scales have allowed us to explore
the universe on scales that are quite different.
And scales where everything that we think
is sensible goes away, on quantum mechanical
scales where particles can be doing many things
at the same time or when you're moving very
fast and your perception of time can change
compared to mine.
And what we've learned, of course, using those
principles going beyond common sense is that
the universe, our myopic views of the universe
are just that they're myopic, that the universe
at it's fundamental scales look quite different.
And in fact I begin my new book with one of
my favorite allegories: Plato's allegory of
the cave, where he likens our existence to
people trapped in a cave, being forced to
look at the shadows of reality from the light
cast behind them on a wall.
And he said the job of a scientist essentially
is to interpret those shadows to understand
the reality underneath.
And when we look at the universe around us
we're seeing the shadows of reality.
And what we've been able to do is peer underneath
to discover the real world, which is really
quite different.
And, just as for those individuals, their
common sense would tell them that the world
is two dimensional because all they see is
the projection of reality, we, for us our
common sense tells us that the world is three
dimensional, but we've learned in fact that
the universe isn’t; it's at least four-dimensional;
the three dimensions of space and one dimension
of time that are tied together yielding a
reality at its basis, which is really quite
different from that which we experience.
That's just one example of the many ways we've
been able to dive down underneath this fabric
that's shielding the real world underneath.
And the fabric is what perhaps our common
sense is based to understand, and what's underneath—it's
not too surprising that it doesn't seem sensible,
because it describes realms of the universe
that we literally did not evolve to originally
understand.
And as I say it's an amazingly fortuitous
accident that our brains evolved so we could
understand those regions as well.
The question arises, naturally, once we understand
at a fundamental level that the universe looks
quite different than we perceive it to be:
Whether what we're now discovering is truly
fundamental or whether we dive down deeper
and the universe will look different still?
Richard Feynman argued that way, he basically
said, “Will we have a theory of everything,
or is the universe like an onion and you peel
back one layer and there's another layer,
and it's an infinite number of layers of onions
(or turtles all the way down depending upon
how you want to describe it)?”
The answer is: we don't to know.
We don't know if there is an ultimate theory
of everything.
But it really doesn't matter in many ways.
What we want to understand the universe better
today than we did yesterday.
We want to expand our understanding and that's
what we try and do.
And science often works by baby steps.
One of the things I describe in my book is
the long series of baby steps that took us
to where we are now, from our understanding
of the universe on the scales that we see
in this room to the fundamental scales.
There were many steps that took us there.
And the process is exciting, and every new
step of discovery is exciting, and every time
we make a new discovery there are more questions
than there are answers.
And so there's guaranteed job security, it
seems to me, for scientists, and I don't have
any great expectations that there is a theory
of everything or a need to know that theory.
To me the questioning and the search is as
exciting in some sense as the answer.
