THIS TIME AGAINST TWO DULY ELECTED MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.
ELECTED MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. I WANT TO GET SOME REACTION NOW
I WANT TO GET SOME REACTION NOW FROM DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL
FROM DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE BERNIE SANDERS,
CANDIDATE BERNIE SANDERS, INDEPENDENT SENATOR FROM
INDEPENDENT SENATOR FROM VERMONT.
VERMONT. SENATOR, GOOD TO SEE YOU.
SENATOR, GOOD TO SEE YOU. WHAT’S YOUR REACTION TO
WHAT’S YOUR REACTION TO PRESIDENT TRUMP ASKING THE
PRESIDENT TRUMP ASKING THE PRESIDENT OF ISRAEL BENJAMIN
PRESIDENT OF ISRAEL BENJAMIN NETANYAHU TO DO THIS, AND
NETANYAHU TO DO THIS, AND NETANYAHU OBLIGING?
NETANYAHU OBLIGING? >> WELL, I WISH I COULD TELL
>> WELL, I WISH I COULD TELL YOU, ALI, THAT I AM SHOCKED.
YOU, ALI, THAT I AM SHOCKED. I AM NOT.
I AM NOT. WE HAVE A PRESIDENT WHO
WE HAVE A PRESIDENT WHO TRAGICALLY IS A RACIST, IS A
TRAGICALLY IS A RACIST, IS A XENOPHOBE, AND WHO IS A
XENOPHOBE, AND WHO IS A RELIGIOUS BIGOT.
RELIGIOUS BIGOT. BUT THE IDEA THAT A MEMBER OF
BUT THE IDEA THAT A MEMBER OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS
THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS CANNOT VISIT A NATION WHICH BY
CANNOT VISIT A NATION WHICH BY THE WAY WE SUPPORT TO THE TUNE
THE WAY WE SUPPORT TO THE TUNE OF BILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF
OF BILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IS CLEARLY AN OUTRAGE.
DOLLARS IS CLEARLY AN OUTRAGE. AND IF ISRAEL DOESN’T WANT
AND IF ISRAEL DOESN’T WANT MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES
MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS TO VISIT THEIR COUNTRY
CONGRESS TO VISIT THEIR COUNTRY TO GET A FIRSTHAND LOOK AT
TO GET A FIRSTHAND LOOK AT WHAT’S GOING ON?
WHAT’S GOING ON? AND I’VE BEEN THERE MANY, MANY
AND I’VE BEEN THERE MANY, MANY TIMES.
TIMES. BUT IF HE DOESN’T WANT MEMBERS
BUT IF HE DOESN’T WANT MEMBERS TO VISIT, MAYBE HE CAN
TO VISIT, MAYBE HE CAN RESPECTFULLY DECLINE THE
RESPECTFULLY DECLINE THE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS THAT WE GIFT
BILLIONS OF DOLLARS THAT WE GIFT TO ISRAEL.
TO ISRAEL. >> OVER TIME, IN EXCESS OF $140
>> OVER TIME, IN EXCESS OF $140 BILLION LAST YEAR ALONE.
BILLION LAST YEAR ALONE. $3 BILLION AND VARIOUS TYPES OF
$3 BILLION AND VARIOUS TYPES OF AID.
AID. YOU HAVE ACTUALLY SUGGESTED THAT
YOU HAVE ACTUALLY SUGGESTED THAT MIGHT BE USED TO LEVERAGE SOME
MIGHT BE USED TO LEVERAGE SOME OF ISRAEL’S BEHAVIOR THAT
OF ISRAEL’S BEHAVIOR THAT REPRESENTATIVES OMAR AND TLAIB
REPRESENTATIVES OMAR AND TLAIB ARE CRITICAL OF, AS YOU HAVE
ARE CRITICAL OF, AS YOU HAVE BEEN CRITICAL OF.
BEEN CRITICAL OF. >> WELL, ALL THAT I AM SAYING IS
>> WELL, ALL THAT I AM SAYING IS WE NEED A MIDDLE EAST POLICY
WE NEED A MIDDLE EAST POLICY WHICH IS EVEN HANDED, WHICH
WHICH IS EVEN HANDED, WHICH PROTECTS THE INDEPENDENCE AND
PROTECTS THE INDEPENDENCE AND THE SAFETY OF ISRAEL, BUT ALSO
THE SAFETY OF ISRAEL, BUT ALSO SHOWS RESPECT TO THE PALESTINIAN
SHOWS RESPECT TO THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE, MANY OF WHOM IN GAZA AND
PEOPLE, MANY OF WHOM IN GAZA AND ELSEWHERE ARE SUFFERING
ELSEWHERE ARE SUFFERING INCREDIBLY.
INCREDIBLY. UNEMPLOYMENT RATE OFF THE
UNEMPLOYMENT RATE OFF THE CHARTS.
CHARTS. PEOPLE CANNOT LEAVE THEIR
PEOPLE CANNOT LEAVE THEIR COMMUNITY.
COMMUNITY. AND I THINK WHAT THE UNITED
AND I THINK WHAT THE UNITED STATES SHOULD BE DOING,
STATES SHOULD BE DOING, ESPECIALLY WITH THE ENORMOUS
ESPECIALLY WITH THE ENORMOUS AMOUNT OF MONEY WE’RE SPENDING
AMOUNT OF MONEY WE’RE SPENDING THERE IS TO DEMAND THAT ISRAEL
THERE IS TO DEMAND THAT ISRAEL AND THE PALESTINIAN LEADERSHIP
AND THE PALESTINIAN LEADERSHIP SIT DOWN AND START WORKING OUT
SIT DOWN AND START WORKING OUT THEIR DIFFERENCES AND CREATE
THEIR DIFFERENCES AND CREATE PEACE IN THAT TROUBLED REGION.
PEACE IN THAT TROUBLED REGION. >> SENATOR, YOU KNOW I’M NEVER
>> SENATOR, YOU KNOW I’M NEVER GOING TO PASS AN OPPORTUNITY
GOING TO PASS AN OPPORTUNITY WHEN YOU’RE ON WITH ME TO TALK
WHEN YOU’RE ON WITH ME TO TALK ABOUT THE ECONOMY.
ABOUT THE ECONOMY. I WANT TO TALK ABOUT WHAT’S
I WANT TO TALK ABOUT WHAT’S GOING ON THIS WEEK.
GOING ON THIS WEEK. DONALD TRUMP’S TRADE WAR, THE
DONALD TRUMP’S TRADE WAR, THE EFFECT THAT IT IS HAVING.
EFFECT THAT IT IS HAVING. HE HAS BEEN ROUNDLY CRITICIZED
HE HAS BEEN ROUNDLY CRITICIZED FOR THE WAY HE’S HANDLED THIS.
FOR THE WAY HE’S HANDLED THIS. HE AND SOME OF HIS SUPPORTERS
HE AND SOME OF HIS SUPPORTERS BELIEVE THAT CHINA NEED TO BE
BELIEVE THAT CHINA NEED TO BE DEALT WITH DIFFERENTLY.
DEALT WITH DIFFERENTLY. YOU HAVE AND MANY OF YOUR
YOU HAVE AND MANY OF YOUR SUPPORTERS HAVE HAD VIEWS THAT
SUPPORTERS HAVE HAD VIEWS THAT WE LOSE OUT TO MANUFACTURING
WE LOSE OUT TO MANUFACTURING THAT COMES FROM LOW WAGE
THAT COMES FROM LOW WAGE COUNTRIES LIKE CHINA.
COUNTRIES LIKE CHINA. WATCHING WHAT YOU’RE WATCHING
WATCHING WHAT YOU’RE WATCHING NOW, HOW WOULD A PRESIDENT
NOW, HOW WOULD A PRESIDENT BERNIE SANDERS DEAL WITH TRADE
BERNIE SANDERS DEAL WITH TRADE ISSUES DIFFERENTLY?
ISSUES DIFFERENTLY? BECAUSE YOU WERE AGAINST THE
BECAUSE YOU WERE AGAINST THE TPP.
TPP. YOU HAVE COME OUT AGAINST A LOT
YOU HAVE COME OUT AGAINST A LOT OF THESE TRADE AGREEMENTS.
OF THESE TRADE AGREEMENTS. >> ABSOLUTELY.
>> ABSOLUTELY. >> HOW WOULD YOU HANDLE MATTERS
>> HOW WOULD YOU HANDLE MATTERS DIFFERENTLY SO WE DON’T GET
DIFFERENTLY SO WE DON’T GET OURSELVES INTO THE PICKLE WE’RE
OURSELVES INTO THE PICKLE WE’RE IN RIGHT NOW?
IN RIGHT NOW? >> FIRST OF ALL, YOU DON’T DO
>> FIRST OF ALL, YOU DON’T DO TRADE POLICY BY TWEET.
TRADE POLICY BY TWEET. YOU DON’T HAVE A BELLIGERENT
YOU DON’T HAVE A BELLIGERENT POLICY TOWARDS OUR ALLIES ALL
POLICY TOWARDS OUR ALLIES ALL OVER THE WORLD.
OVER THE WORLD. WHAT YOU DO IS SIT DOWN WITH THE
WHAT YOU DO IS SIT DOWN WITH THE STAKEHOLDERS, WHICH IS LABOR,
STAKEHOLDERS, WHICH IS LABOR, WHICH ARE FARMERS, AND YOU WORK
WHICH ARE FARMERS, AND YOU WORK OUT A TRADE POLICY WHICH WORKS
OUT A TRADE POLICY WHICH WORKS FOR ORDINARY AMERICANS AND NOT
FOR ORDINARY AMERICANS AND NOT JUST LARGE CORPORATIONS, WHICH
JUST LARGE CORPORATIONS, WHICH IS HISTORICALLY BEEN WHAT OUR
IS HISTORICALLY BEEN WHAT OUR TRADE POLICY IS ABOUT.
TRADE POLICY IS ABOUT. LOOK, THE TRUTH IS IF YOU LOOKED
LOOK, THE TRUTH IS IF YOU LOOKED AT NAFTA AND PNTR WITH CHINA,
AT NAFTA AND PNTR WITH CHINA, THAT HAS COST US SOME 4 MILLION
THAT HAS COST US SOME 4 MILLION JOBS.
JOBS. SO I HAPPEN TO BELIEVE IN TRADE,
SO I HAPPEN TO BELIEVE IN TRADE, I’M A STRONG BELIEVER IN TRADE.
I’M A STRONG BELIEVER IN TRADE. BUT KIT NOT BE UNFETTERED FREE
BUT KIT NOT BE UNFETTERED FREE TRADE WHICH IT REALLY IS NOT.
TRADE WHICH IT REALLY IS NOT. THERE IS NOTHING FREE ABOUT IT.
THERE IS NOTHING FREE ABOUT IT. BUT IT HAS TO BE FAIR TRADE,
BUT IT HAS TO BE FAIR TRADE, WHICH PROTECTS AMERICAN WORKERS
WHICH PROTECTS AMERICAN WORKERS AND FARMERS.
AND FARMERS. >> SENATOR, WHEN YOU GOT INTO
>> SENATOR, WHEN YOU GOT INTO GOVERNMENT, TRADE -- I’M MAKING
GOVERNMENT, TRADE -- I’M MAKING THIS UP, BUT IT WAS SOMEWHERE
THIS UP, BUT IT WAS SOMEWHERE AROUND 20% OF GLOBAL GDP.
AROUND 20% OF GLOBAL GDP. IT’S NOW SOMEWHERE IN EXCESS OF
IT’S NOW SOMEWHERE IN EXCESS OF 60% GDP.
60% GDP. THE WORLD GOT RICHER FOR IT.
THE WORLD GOT RICHER FOR IT. THE GDP IS HIGHER.
THE GDP IS HIGHER. CORPORATE PROFITABILITY IS
CORPORATE PROFITABILITY IS HIGHER.
HIGHER. THE FACT IS THERE IS MORE MONEY
THE FACT IS THERE IS MORE MONEY BECAUSE OF TRADE.
BECAUSE OF TRADE. WE HAVEN’T USED THAT MONEY TO
WE HAVEN’T USED THAT MONEY TO TRAIN PEOPLE, TO RETRAIN PEOPLE,
TRAIN PEOPLE, TO RETRAIN PEOPLE, TO EQUIP PEOPLE FOR THE FUTURE.
TO EQUIP PEOPLE FOR THE FUTURE. IS TRADE REALLY THE ENEMY?
IS TRADE REALLY THE ENEMY? OR IS HOW WE DEAL WITH THE
OR IS HOW WE DEAL WITH THE PROFITS FROM TRADE THE PROBLEM?
PROFITS FROM TRADE THE PROBLEM? >> WELL, ALI, I THINK TRADE IS
>> WELL, ALI, I THINK TRADE IS ONE OF THE PROBLEMS.
ONE OF THE PROBLEMS. AUTOMATION AND ARTIFICIAL
AUTOMATION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WHICH ARE GOING TO
INTELLIGENCE WHICH ARE GOING TO COST US MANY, MANY JOBS ARE
COST US MANY, MANY JOBS ARE ANOTHER PART OF THE PROBLEM.
ANOTHER PART OF THE PROBLEM. BUT TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION,
BUT TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, WHEN WE TALK ABOUT THE OVERALL
WHEN WE TALK ABOUT THE OVERALL ECONOMY, IT’S MORE THAN TRADE.
ECONOMY, IT’S MORE THAN TRADE. YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT A SITUATION
YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT A SITUATION WHERE TODAY YOU HAVE THREE
WHERE TODAY YOU HAVE THREE PEOPLE OWNING MORE WEALTH THAN
PEOPLE OWNING MORE WEALTH THAN THE BOTTOM HALF OF AMERICANS IN
THE BOTTOM HALF OF AMERICANS IN SOCIETY.
SOCIETY. THAT’S NOT JUST TRADE.
THAT’S NOT JUST TRADE. THERE IS A LOT OF FACTORS THERE.
THERE IS A LOT OF FACTORS THERE. YOU HAVE MAJOR CORPORATIONS NOT
YOU HAVE MAJOR CORPORATIONS NOT PAYING A NICK UNTIL FEDERAL
PAYING A NICK UNTIL FEDERAL INCOME TAXES.
INCOME TAXES. YOU HAVE HALF OF THE AMERICAN
YOU HAVE HALF OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WORKING PAYCHECK TO
PEOPLE WORKING PAYCHECK TO PAYCHECK.
PAYCHECK. 87 MILLION AMERICANS ARE EITHER
87 MILLION AMERICANS ARE EITHER UNINSURED OR UNDERINSURED.
UNINSURED OR UNDERINSURED. AND TONIGHT SOME 500,000
AND TONIGHT SOME 500,000 AMERICANS ARE GOING TO BE
AMERICANS ARE GOING TO BE SLEEPING OUT ON THE STREET WHEN
SLEEPING OUT ON THE STREET WHEN 49% OF ALL NEW ENGLAND 1%.
49% OF ALL NEW ENGLAND 1%. THE BOTTOM LINE THERE IS TRADE
THE BOTTOM LINE THERE IS TRADE IS ONE OF THE ISSUES, NOT THE
IS ONE OF THE ISSUES, NOT THE ONLY ONE.
ONLY ONE. WE NEED AN ECONOMY AND A
WE NEED AN ECONOMY AND A GOVERNMENT THAT WORKS FOR
GOVERNMENT THAT WORKS FOR EVERYBODY, NOT JUST THE 1% WHICH
EVERYBODY, NOT JUST THE 1% WHICH IS CURRENTLY THE CASE.
IS CURRENTLY THE CASE. >> WHAT DOES IT LOOK LIKE TO
>> WHAT DOES IT LOOK LIKE TO WORK FOR EVERYBODY?
WORK FOR EVERYBODY? AND I KNOW WE’LL GET TO MEDICARE
AND I KNOW WE’LL GET TO MEDICARE FOR ALL IN A SECOND, BECAUSE
FOR ALL IN A SECOND, BECAUSE THAT’S ONE OF THE THINGS YOU SAY
THAT’S ONE OF THE THINGS YOU SAY WILL WORK FOR EVERYBODY.
WILL WORK FOR EVERYBODY. >> GOOD.
>> GOOD. >> WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR THE
>> WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR THE REST OF PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT
REST OF PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT EMPLOYED?
EMPLOYED? IT’S NOT A HUGE PERCENTAGE OF
IT’S NOT A HUGE PERCENTAGE OF OUR POPULATION.
OUR POPULATION. IT’S A VERY LOW PERCENTAGE, BUT
IT’S A VERY LOW PERCENTAGE, BUT IT’S STUBBORN.
IT’S STUBBORN. THERE ARE A NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN
THERE ARE A NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY, SOMEWHERE AROUND
THIS COUNTRY, SOMEWHERE AROUND 10 MILLION PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT
10 MILLION PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT PARTICIPATING IN THIS ECONOMY.
PARTICIPATING IN THIS ECONOMY. >> BUT ALI, IT’S NOT JUST THE
>> BUT ALI, IT’S NOT JUST THE UNEMPLOYED.
UNEMPLOYED. AND YOU’RE RIGHT, THERE ARE MORE
AND YOU’RE RIGHT, THERE ARE MORE THAN WE THINK AND THEY’RE
THAN WE THINK AND THEY’RE HURTING.
HURTING. IT IS IN FACT 10s OF MILLIONS OF
IT IS IN FACT 10s OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE WHO ARE TRYING TO GET BY
PEOPLE WHO ARE TRYING TO GET BY TODAY ON 10, 11, 12 BUCKS AN
TODAY ON 10, 11, 12 BUCKS AN HOUR.
HOUR. YOU CAN’T DO IT.
YOU CAN’T DO IT. IT IS PEOPLE IN VERMONT AND IN
IT IS PEOPLE IN VERMONT AND IN CALIFORNIA WORKING TWO OR THREE
CALIFORNIA WORKING TWO OR THREE JOBS IN ORDER TO PUT THE -- PAY
JOBS IN ORDER TO PUT THE -- PAY THE BILLS THAT THEIR FAMILIES
THE BILLS THAT THEIR FAMILIES ARE NEEDING.
ARE NEEDING. IT IS ELDERLY PEOPLE WHO ARE
IT IS ELDERLY PEOPLE WHO ARE TRYING TO GET BY $12,000,
TRYING TO GET BY $12,000, $13,000 SOCIAL SECURITY.
$13,000 SOCIAL SECURITY. IT IS ONE OUT OF FIVE PEOPLE
IT IS ONE OUT OF FIVE PEOPLE CANNOT AFFORD THE MEDICINE THAT
CANNOT AFFORD THE MEDICINE THAT THEIR DOCTORS PRESCRIBE.
THEIR DOCTORS PRESCRIBE. SO THE TRUTH IS YOU GOT AN
SO THE TRUTH IS YOU GOT AN ECONOMY THAT’S DOING REALLY,
ECONOMY THAT’S DOING REALLY, REALLY WELL FOR THE PEOPLE ON
REALLY WELL FOR THE PEOPLE ON TOP, BUT A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE
TOP, BUT A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE HURTING IN THE BOTTOM 50%.
HURTING IN THE BOTTOM 50%. AND THAT IS AN ISSUE WE’VE GOT
AND THAT IS AN ISSUE WE’VE GOT TO TALK ABOUT.
TO TALK ABOUT. >> ALL RIGHT.
>> ALL RIGHT. LET’S TALK ABOUT MEDICARE FOR
LET’S TALK ABOUT MEDICARE FOR ALL.
ALL. YOU KNOW I LIKE TALKING ABOUT
YOU KNOW I LIKE TALKING ABOUT THIS WITH YOU, COMING FROM
THIS WITH YOU, COMING FROM CANADA.
CANADA. I UNDERSTAND WHAT EVERYBODY
I UNDERSTAND WHAT EVERYBODY HAVING HEALTH CARE LOOKS LIKE.
HAVING HEALTH CARE LOOKS LIKE. HOWEVER, ONE OF THE THINGS YOU
HOWEVER, ONE OF THE THINGS YOU AND I HAVE TALKED ABOUT IS THERE
AND I HAVE TALKED ABOUT IS THERE WILL BE STRUCTURAL CHANGE WITH
WILL BE STRUCTURAL CHANGE WITH YOUR PLAN.
YOUR PLAN. THERE WILL BE PEOPLE PUT OUT OF
THERE WILL BE PEOPLE PUT OUT OF THEIR JOBS, AND THERE WILL BE A
THEIR JOBS, AND THERE WILL BE A TRANSITION.
TRANSITION. AND YOU TALKED ABOUT IT TAKING
AND YOU TALKED ABOUT IT TAKING AT LEAST FOUR YEARS TO GET DONE,
AT LEAST FOUR YEARS TO GET DONE, IF NOT LONGER.
IF NOT LONGER. NOW WE HAVE A DIFFERENT PROBLEM
NOW WE HAVE A DIFFERENT PROBLEM ON OUR HANDS.
ON OUR HANDS. WE HAVE A PRESIDENT.
WE HAVE A PRESIDENT. WE’RE TEN YEARS AND TWO MONTHS
WE’RE TEN YEARS AND TWO MONTHS INTO EXPANSION.
INTO EXPANSION. IT’S A VERY LONG ONE.
IT’S A VERY LONG ONE. AT SOME POINT THERE IS GOING TO
AT SOME POINT THERE IS GOING TO BE RECESSION.
BE RECESSION. SOME PEOPLE SAY THIS PRESIDENT
SOME PEOPLE SAY THIS PRESIDENT MIGHT MARCH US HEAD LONG INTO
MIGHT MARCH US HEAD LONG INTO ONE.
ONE. WHAT HAPPENS IF THE PRESIDENT
WHAT HAPPENS IF THE PRESIDENT WINS THE ELECTION?
WINS THE ELECTION? PRESIDENT BERNIE SANDERS, ARE
PRESIDENT BERNIE SANDERS, ARE YOU GOING TO IMPLICATE MEDICARE
YOU GOING TO IMPLICATE MEDICARE FOR ALL RIGHT OFF THE BAT?
FOR ALL RIGHT OFF THE BAT? >> ABSOLUTELY.
>> ABSOLUTELY. ABSOLUTELY.
ABSOLUTELY. THIS WILL IMPROVE THE ECONOMY.
THIS WILL IMPROVE THE ECONOMY. WHEN YOU’VE GOT 87 MILLION
WHEN YOU’VE GOT 87 MILLION PEOPLE WHO CAN’T AFFORD TO GO TO
PEOPLE WHO CAN’T AFFORD TO GO TO THE DOCTOR, YOU HAVE 30,000
THE DOCTOR, YOU HAVE 30,000 PEOPLE WHO ARE GOING TO DIE THIS
PEOPLE WHO ARE GOING TO DIE THIS YEAR BECAUSE THEY DON’T GET TO A
YEAR BECAUSE THEY DON’T GET TO A DOCTOR WHEN THEY SHOULD.
DOCTOR WHEN THEY SHOULD. WHEN YOU HAVE 500,000 PEOPLE,
WHEN YOU HAVE 500,000 PEOPLE, UNBELIEVABLE, HALF A MILLION
UNBELIEVABLE, HALF A MILLION PEOPLE GO BANKRUPT BECAUSE THEY
PEOPLE GO BANKRUPT BECAUSE THEY CANNOT AFFORD THE OUTRAGEOUS
CANNOT AFFORD THE OUTRAGEOUS MEDICAL BILLS THEY GET.
MEDICAL BILLS THEY GET. >> THE ONLY DEVELOPED CONTINUE
>> THE ONLY DEVELOPED CONTINUE IN THE WORLD WHERE THAT HAPPENS.
IN THE WORLD WHERE THAT HAPPENS. >> THAT’S RIGHT.
>> THAT’S RIGHT. YOU’RE ASKING OVERALL WILL IT
YOU’RE ASKING OVERALL WILL IT IMPROVE THE ECONOMY TO HAVE
IMPROVE THE ECONOMY TO HAVE MEDICARE FOR ALL OVER A
MEDICARE FOR ALL OVER A FOUR-YEAR TRANSITION, THE ANSWER
FOUR-YEAR TRANSITION, THE ANSWER IS ABSOLUTELY YES.
IS ABSOLUTELY YES. I TELL YOU ONE OF THE THINGS WE
I TELL YOU ONE OF THE THINGS WE DON’T TALK ENOUGH ABOUT, IT WILL
DON’T TALK ENOUGH ABOUT, IT WILL HELP HOME HEALTH CARE FOR THE
HELP HOME HEALTH CARE FOR THE ELDERLY.
ELDERLY. YOU DON’T HAVE TO GO INTO A
YOU DON’T HAVE TO GO INTO A NURSING HOME BECAUSE MY
NURSING HOME BECAUSE MY LEGISLATION COVERS HOME HEALTH
LEGISLATION COVERS HOME HEALTH CARE.
CARE. THE OTHER THING IT DOES, WHICH
THE OTHER THING IT DOES, WHICH IS PRETTY AMAZING, IS THAT ARE
IS PRETTY AMAZING, IS THAT ARE IN A JOB RIGHT NOW AND MILLIONS
IN A JOB RIGHT NOW AND MILLIONS OF PEOPLE WHO ARE AT A JOB THAT
OF PEOPLE WHO ARE AT A JOB THAT THEY REALLY DON’T LIKE, BUT
THEY REALLY DON’T LIKE, BUT THEY’RE THERE BECAUSE THEY GET
THEY’RE THERE BECAUSE THEY GET DECENT HEALTH CARE, WHEN YOU
DECENT HEALTH CARE, WHEN YOU HAVE MEDICARE FOR ALL, SUDDENLY
HAVE MEDICARE FOR ALL, SUDDENLY YOU’RE GOING SEE A WHOLE LOT OF
YOU’RE GOING SEE A WHOLE LOT OF PEOPLE STARTING SMALL
PEOPLE STARTING SMALL BUSINESSES, GOING OUT AND DOING
BUSINESSES, GOING OUT AND DOING ALL KINDS OF INCREDIBLE THINGS
ALL KINDS OF INCREDIBLE THINGS BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT NOW CHAINED
BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT NOW CHAINED DOWN AT A JOB WHICH THEY HAVE
DOWN AT A JOB WHICH THEY HAVE ONLY BECAUSE THEY HAVE DECENT
