FOR
FOR NEARLY
FOR NEARLY A
FOR NEARLY A YEAR
FOR NEARLY A YEAR --
FOR NEARLY A YEAR -- AUSTIN
FOR NEARLY A YEAR -- AUSTIN
POLICE
FOR NEARLY A YEAR -- AUSTIN
POLICE OFFICERS
FOR NEARLY A YEAR -- AUSTIN
POLICE OFFICERS HAVE
FOR NEARLY A YEAR -- AUSTIN
POLICE OFFICERS HAVE
BEEN
FOR NEARLY A YEAR -- AUSTIN
POLICE OFFICERS HAVE
BEEN UNHAPPY.
POLICE OFFICERS HAVE
BEEN UNHAPPY.
POLICE OFFICERS HAVE
BEEN UNHAPPY.
THEY'RE
POLICE OFFICERS HAVE
BEEN UNHAPPY.
THEY'RE LEAVING
POLICE OFFICERS HAVE
BEEN UNHAPPY.
THEY'RE LEAVING AT
POLICE OFFICERS HAVE
BEEN UNHAPPY.
THEY'RE LEAVING AT A
POLICE OFFICERS HAVE
BEEN UNHAPPY.
THEY'RE LEAVING AT A MUCH
POLICE OFFICERS HAVE
BEEN UNHAPPY.
THEY'RE LEAVING AT A MUCH HIGHER
BEEN UNHAPPY.
THEY'RE LEAVING AT A MUCH HIGHER
BEEN UNHAPPY.
THEY'RE LEAVING AT A MUCH HIGHER
RATE
BEEN UNHAPPY.
THEY'RE LEAVING AT A MUCH HIGHER
RATE --
BEEN UNHAPPY.
THEY'RE LEAVING AT A MUCH HIGHER
RATE -- LARGELY
THEY'RE LEAVING AT A MUCH HIGHER
RATE -- LARGELY
THEY'RE LEAVING AT A MUCH HIGHER
RATE -- LARGELY
BECAUSE
THEY'RE LEAVING AT A MUCH HIGHER
RATE -- LARGELY
BECAUSE THEY
THEY'RE LEAVING AT A MUCH HIGHER
RATE -- LARGELY
BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T
THEY'RE LEAVING AT A MUCH HIGHER
RATE -- LARGELY
BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T AGREE
THEY'RE LEAVING AT A MUCH HIGHER
RATE -- LARGELY
BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T AGREE ON
THEY'RE LEAVING AT A MUCH HIGHER
RATE -- LARGELY
BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T AGREE ON A
RATE -- LARGELY
BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T AGREE ON A
RATE -- LARGELY
BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T AGREE ON A
LABOR
BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T AGREE ON A
LABOR
BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T AGREE ON A
LABOR
CONTRACT
BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T AGREE ON A
LABOR
CONTRACT WITH
BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T AGREE ON A
LABOR
CONTRACT WITH THE
BECAUSE THEY COULDN'T AGREE ON A
LABOR
CONTRACT WITH THE CITY.
LABOR
CONTRACT WITH THE CITY.
LABOR
CONTRACT WITH THE CITY.
BUT
LABOR
CONTRACT WITH THE CITY.
BUT TONY
LABOR
CONTRACT WITH THE CITY.
BUT TONY PLOHETSKI
LABOR
CONTRACT WITH THE CITY.
BUT TONY PLOHETSKI TELLS
LABOR
CONTRACT WITH THE CITY.
BUT TONY PLOHETSKI TELLS US
LABOR
CONTRACT WITH THE CITY.
BUT TONY PLOHETSKI TELLS US --
CONTRACT WITH THE CITY.
BUT TONY PLOHETSKI TELLS US --
CONTRACT WITH THE CITY.
BUT TONY PLOHETSKI TELLS US --
THAT
CONTRACT WITH THE CITY.
BUT TONY PLOHETSKI TELLS US --
THAT COULD
CONTRACT WITH THE CITY.
BUT TONY PLOHETSKI TELLS US --
THAT COULD ALL
BUT TONY PLOHETSKI TELLS US --
THAT COULD ALL
BUT TONY PLOHETSKI TELLS US --
THAT COULD ALL
CHANGE
BUT TONY PLOHETSKI TELLS US --
THAT COULD ALL
CHANGE TOMORROW.
THAT COULD ALL
CHANGE TOMORROW.
CHANGE TOMORROW.
MEET
MEET WILLIAMSON
MEET WILLIAMSON COUNTY
MEET WILLIAMSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S
MEET WILLIAMSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S
DEPUTY
MEET WILLIAMSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S
DEPUTY JASON
MEET WILLIAMSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S
DEPUTY JASON WOLF.
MEET WILLIAMSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S
DEPUTY JASON WOLF.
I
MEET WILLIAMSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S
DEPUTY JASON WOLF.
I WAS
MEET WILLIAMSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S
DEPUTY JASON WOLF.
I WAS WANTING
MEET WILLIAMSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S
DEPUTY JASON WOLF.
I WAS WANTING TO
MEET WILLIAMSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S
DEPUTY JASON WOLF.
I WAS WANTING TO STICK
MEET WILLIAMSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S
DEPUTY JASON WOLF.
I WAS WANTING TO STICK IT
MEET WILLIAMSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S
DEPUTY JASON WOLF.
I WAS WANTING TO STICK IT OUT
MEET WILLIAMSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S
DEPUTY JASON WOLF.
I WAS WANTING TO STICK IT OUT TO
DEPUTY JASON WOLF.
I WAS WANTING TO STICK IT OUT TO
DEPUTY JASON WOLF.
I WAS WANTING TO STICK IT OUT TO
THE
DEPUTY JASON WOLF.
I WAS WANTING TO STICK IT OUT TO
THE FULL
DEPUTY JASON WOLF.
I WAS WANTING TO STICK IT OUT TO
THE FULL 23.
I WAS WANTING TO STICK IT OUT TO
THE FULL 23.
I WAS WANTING TO STICK IT OUT TO
THE FULL 23.
HE
I WAS WANTING TO STICK IT OUT TO
THE FULL 23.
HE JOINED
I WAS WANTING TO STICK IT OUT TO
THE FULL 23.
HE JOINED THE
I WAS WANTING TO STICK IT OUT TO
THE FULL 23.
HE JOINED THE SHERIFF'S
I WAS WANTING TO STICK IT OUT TO
THE FULL 23.
HE JOINED THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE
THE FULL 23.
HE JOINED THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE
THE FULL 23.
HE JOINED THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE
IN
THE FULL 23.
HE JOINED THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE
IN GEORGETOWN
HE JOINED THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE
IN GEORGETOWN
HE JOINED THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE
IN GEORGETOWN
IN
HE JOINED THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE
IN GEORGETOWN
IN JANUARY
HE JOINED THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE
IN GEORGETOWN
IN JANUARY --
HE JOINED THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE
IN GEORGETOWN
IN JANUARY -- A
HE JOINED THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE
IN GEORGETOWN
IN JANUARY -- A FEW
HE JOINED THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE
IN GEORGETOWN
IN JANUARY -- A FEW WEEKS
HE JOINED THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE
IN GEORGETOWN
IN JANUARY -- A FEW WEEKS AFTER
IN GEORGETOWN
IN JANUARY -- A FEW WEEKS AFTER
IN GEORGETOWN
IN JANUARY -- A FEW WEEKS AFTER
AUSTIN
IN GEORGETOWN
IN JANUARY -- A FEW WEEKS AFTER
AUSTIN OFFICIALS
IN JANUARY -- A FEW WEEKS AFTER
AUSTIN OFFICIALS
IN JANUARY -- A FEW WEEKS AFTER
AUSTIN OFFICIALS
VOTED
IN JANUARY -- A FEW WEEKS AFTER
AUSTIN OFFICIALS
VOTED DOWN
IN JANUARY -- A FEW WEEKS AFTER
AUSTIN OFFICIALS
VOTED DOWN A
IN JANUARY -- A FEW WEEKS AFTER
AUSTIN OFFICIALS
VOTED DOWN A NEW
IN JANUARY -- A FEW WEEKS AFTER
AUSTIN OFFICIALS
VOTED DOWN A NEW PROPOSED
IN JANUARY -- A FEW WEEKS AFTER
AUSTIN OFFICIALS
VOTED DOWN A NEW PROPOSED LABOR
AUSTIN OFFICIALS
VOTED DOWN A NEW PROPOSED LABOR
AUSTIN OFFICIALS
VOTED DOWN A NEW PROPOSED LABOR
AGREEMENT
VOTED DOWN A NEW PROPOSED LABOR
AGREEMENT
VOTED DOWN A NEW PROPOSED LABOR
AGREEMENT
WITH
VOTED DOWN A NEW PROPOSED LABOR
AGREEMENT
WITH OFFICERS.
AGREEMENT
WITH OFFICERS.
AGREEMENT
WITH OFFICERS.
WITH
AGREEMENT
WITH OFFICERS.
WITH THE
AGREEMENT
WITH OFFICERS.
WITH THE WHOLE
AGREEMENT
WITH OFFICERS.
WITH THE WHOLE CONTACT
WITH OFFICERS.
WITH THE WHOLE CONTACT
WITH OFFICERS.
WITH THE WHOLE CONTACT
SITUATION,
WITH OFFICERS.
WITH THE WHOLE CONTACT
SITUATION, THAT
WITH OFFICERS.
WITH THE WHOLE CONTACT
SITUATION, THAT WAS
WITH OFFICERS.
WITH THE WHOLE CONTACT
SITUATION, THAT WAS IT.
WITH OFFICERS.
WITH THE WHOLE CONTACT
SITUATION, THAT WAS IT. THAT
WITH THE WHOLE CONTACT
SITUATION, THAT WAS IT. THAT
WITH THE WHOLE CONTACT
SITUATION, THAT WAS IT. THAT
KIND
SITUATION, THAT WAS IT. THAT
KIND
SITUATION, THAT WAS IT. THAT
KIND
OF
SITUATION, THAT WAS IT. THAT
KIND
OF TOLD
SITUATION, THAT WAS IT. THAT
KIND
OF TOLD ME,
SITUATION, THAT WAS IT. THAT
KIND
OF TOLD ME, THE
SITUATION, THAT WAS IT. THAT
KIND
OF TOLD ME, THE CITY
SITUATION, THAT WAS IT. THAT
KIND
OF TOLD ME, THE CITY DOESN'T
KIND
OF TOLD ME, THE CITY DOESN'T
KIND
OF TOLD ME, THE CITY DOESN'T
REALLY
KIND
OF TOLD ME, THE CITY DOESN'T
REALLY SUPPORT
KIND
OF TOLD ME, THE CITY DOESN'T
REALLY SUPPORT US.
OF TOLD ME, THE CITY DOESN'T
REALLY SUPPORT US.
OF TOLD ME, THE CITY DOESN'T
REALLY SUPPORT US.
HE
OF TOLD ME, THE CITY DOESN'T
REALLY SUPPORT US.
HE STOOD
OF TOLD ME, THE CITY DOESN'T
REALLY SUPPORT US.
HE STOOD TO
OF TOLD ME, THE CITY DOESN'T
REALLY SUPPORT US.
HE STOOD TO LOSE
OF TOLD ME, THE CITY DOESN'T
REALLY SUPPORT US.
HE STOOD TO LOSE UP
OF TOLD ME, THE CITY DOESN'T
REALLY SUPPORT US.
HE STOOD TO LOSE UP TO
OF TOLD ME, THE CITY DOESN'T
REALLY SUPPORT US.
HE STOOD TO LOSE UP TO 40-
REALLY SUPPORT US.
HE STOOD TO LOSE UP TO 40-
REALLY SUPPORT US.
HE STOOD TO LOSE UP TO 40-
THOUSAND
REALLY SUPPORT US.
HE STOOD TO LOSE UP TO 40-
THOUSAND DOLLARS
REALLY SUPPORT US.
HE STOOD TO LOSE UP TO 40-
THOUSAND DOLLARS WITH
HE STOOD TO LOSE UP TO 40-
THOUSAND DOLLARS WITH
HE STOOD TO LOSE UP TO 40-
THOUSAND DOLLARS WITH
THE
HE STOOD TO LOSE UP TO 40-
THOUSAND DOLLARS WITH
THE LOSS
HE STOOD TO LOSE UP TO 40-
THOUSAND DOLLARS WITH
THE LOSS OF
HE STOOD TO LOSE UP TO 40-
THOUSAND DOLLARS WITH
THE LOSS OF A
HE STOOD TO LOSE UP TO 40-
THOUSAND DOLLARS WITH
THE LOSS OF A CONTRACT
HE STOOD TO LOSE UP TO 40-
THOUSAND DOLLARS WITH
THE LOSS OF A CONTRACT BENEFIT
THOUSAND DOLLARS WITH
THE LOSS OF A CONTRACT BENEFIT
THOUSAND DOLLARS WITH
THE LOSS OF A CONTRACT BENEFIT
THAT
THOUSAND DOLLARS WITH
THE LOSS OF A CONTRACT BENEFIT
THAT PAID
THOUSAND DOLLARS WITH
THE LOSS OF A CONTRACT BENEFIT
THAT PAID OFFICERS
THE LOSS OF A CONTRACT BENEFIT
THAT PAID OFFICERS
THE LOSS OF A CONTRACT BENEFIT
THAT PAID OFFICERS
UP
THE LOSS OF A CONTRACT BENEFIT
THAT PAID OFFICERS
UP TO
THE LOSS OF A CONTRACT BENEFIT
THAT PAID OFFICERS
UP TO 17-HUNDRED
THE LOSS OF A CONTRACT BENEFIT
THAT PAID OFFICERS
UP TO 17-HUNDRED HOURS
THE LOSS OF A CONTRACT BENEFIT
THAT PAID OFFICERS
UP TO 17-HUNDRED HOURS IN
THE LOSS OF A CONTRACT BENEFIT
THAT PAID OFFICERS
UP TO 17-HUNDRED HOURS IN UNUSED
THAT PAID OFFICERS
UP TO 17-HUNDRED HOURS IN UNUSED
THAT PAID OFFICERS
UP TO 17-HUNDRED HOURS IN UNUSED
SICK
UP TO 17-HUNDRED HOURS IN UNUSED
SICK
UP TO 17-HUNDRED HOURS IN UNUSED
SICK
TIME.
UP TO 17-HUNDRED HOURS IN UNUSED
SICK
TIME. SO
UP TO 17-HUNDRED HOURS IN UNUSED
SICK
TIME. SO BEFORE
UP TO 17-HUNDRED HOURS IN UNUSED
SICK
TIME. SO BEFORE THE
UP TO 17-HUNDRED HOURS IN UNUSED
SICK
TIME. SO BEFORE THE LAST
SICK
TIME. SO BEFORE THE LAST
SICK
TIME. SO BEFORE THE LAST
CONTRACT
SICK
TIME. SO BEFORE THE LAST
CONTRACT EXPIRED,
SICK
TIME. SO BEFORE THE LAST
CONTRACT EXPIRED, HE
TIME. SO BEFORE THE LAST
CONTRACT EXPIRED, HE
TIME. SO BEFORE THE LAST
CONTRACT EXPIRED, HE
TOOK
TIME. SO BEFORE THE LAST
CONTRACT EXPIRED, HE
TOOK THE
TIME. SO BEFORE THE LAST
CONTRACT EXPIRED, HE
TOOK THE MONEY
TIME. SO BEFORE THE LAST
CONTRACT EXPIRED, HE
TOOK THE MONEY --
TIME. SO BEFORE THE LAST
CONTRACT EXPIRED, HE
TOOK THE MONEY -- AND
TIME. SO BEFORE THE LAST
CONTRACT EXPIRED, HE
TOOK THE MONEY -- AND HEADED
CONTRACT EXPIRED, HE
TOOK THE MONEY -- AND HEADED
CONTRACT EXPIRED, HE
TOOK THE MONEY -- AND HEADED
NORTH.
TOOK THE MONEY -- AND HEADED
NORTH.
TOOK THE MONEY -- AND HEADED
NORTH.
ELEVEN
TOOK THE MONEY -- AND HEADED
NORTH.
ELEVEN MONTHS
TOOK THE MONEY -- AND HEADED
NORTH.
ELEVEN MONTHS AGO
TOOK THE MONEY -- AND HEADED
NORTH.
ELEVEN MONTHS AGO --
TOOK THE MONEY -- AND HEADED
NORTH.
ELEVEN MONTHS AGO -- AMID
TOOK THE MONEY -- AND HEADED
NORTH.
ELEVEN MONTHS AGO -- AMID AN
NORTH.
ELEVEN MONTHS AGO -- AMID AN
NORTH.
ELEVEN MONTHS AGO -- AMID AN
OUTCRY
NORTH.
ELEVEN MONTHS AGO -- AMID AN
OUTCRY FROM
NORTH.
ELEVEN MONTHS AGO -- AMID AN
OUTCRY FROM SOME
ELEVEN MONTHS AGO -- AMID AN
OUTCRY FROM SOME
ELEVEN MONTHS AGO -- AMID AN
OUTCRY FROM SOME
COMMUNITY
ELEVEN MONTHS AGO -- AMID AN
OUTCRY FROM SOME
COMMUNITY GROUPS
ELEVEN MONTHS AGO -- AMID AN
OUTCRY FROM SOME
COMMUNITY GROUPS --
ELEVEN MONTHS AGO -- AMID AN
OUTCRY FROM SOME
COMMUNITY GROUPS -- AUSTIN
ELEVEN MONTHS AGO -- AMID AN
OUTCRY FROM SOME
COMMUNITY GROUPS -- AUSTIN CITY
OUTCRY FROM SOME
COMMUNITY GROUPS -- AUSTIN CITY
COMMUNITY GROUPS -- AUSTIN CITY
COUNCIL
COUNCIL MEMBERS
COUNCIL MEMBERS REJECTED
COUNCIL MEMBERS REJECTED A
COUNCIL MEMBERS REJECTED A NEW,
COUNCIL MEMBERS REJECTED A NEW,
MULTI-YEAR
COUNCIL MEMBERS REJECTED A NEW,
MULTI-YEAR
CONTRACT.
COUNCIL MEMBERS REJECTED A NEW,
MULTI-YEAR
CONTRACT. THEY
COUNCIL MEMBERS REJECTED A NEW,
MULTI-YEAR
CONTRACT. THEY SAY
COUNCIL MEMBERS REJECTED A NEW,
MULTI-YEAR
CONTRACT. THEY SAY THE
COUNCIL MEMBERS REJECTED A NEW,
MULTI-YEAR
CONTRACT. THEY SAY THE COST
COUNCIL MEMBERS REJECTED A NEW,
MULTI-YEAR
CONTRACT. THEY SAY THE COST --
MULTI-YEAR
CONTRACT. THEY SAY THE COST --
MULTI-YEAR
CONTRACT. THEY SAY THE COST --
AN
MULTI-YEAR
CONTRACT. THEY SAY THE COST --
AN ESTIMATED
MULTI-YEAR
CONTRACT. THEY SAY THE COST --
AN ESTIMATED 80-
CONTRACT. THEY SAY THE COST --
AN ESTIMATED 80-
CONTRACT. THEY SAY THE COST --
AN ESTIMATED 80-
MILLION
CONTRACT. THEY SAY THE COST --
AN ESTIMATED 80-
MILLION FOR
CONTRACT. THEY SAY THE COST --
AN ESTIMATED 80-
MILLION FOR PAY
CONTRACT. THEY SAY THE COST --
AN ESTIMATED 80-
MILLION FOR PAY RAISES
CONTRACT. THEY SAY THE COST --
AN ESTIMATED 80-
MILLION FOR PAY RAISES AND
CONTRACT. THEY SAY THE COST --
AN ESTIMATED 80-
MILLION FOR PAY RAISES AND OTHER
AN ESTIMATED 80-
MILLION FOR PAY RAISES AND OTHER
AN ESTIMATED 80-
MILLION FOR PAY RAISES AND OTHER
STIPENDS
AN ESTIMATED 80-
MILLION FOR PAY RAISES AND OTHER
STIPENDS --
AN ESTIMATED 80-
MILLION FOR PAY RAISES AND OTHER
STIPENDS -- WAS
MILLION FOR PAY RAISES AND OTHER
STIPENDS -- WAS
MILLION FOR PAY RAISES AND OTHER
STIPENDS -- WAS
TOO
MILLION FOR PAY RAISES AND OTHER
STIPENDS -- WAS
TOO MUCH.
STIPENDS -- WAS
TOO MUCH.
STIPENDS -- WAS
TOO MUCH.
IT'S
STIPENDS -- WAS
TOO MUCH.
IT'S BEEN
STIPENDS -- WAS
TOO MUCH.
IT'S BEEN A
STIPENDS -- WAS
TOO MUCH.
IT'S BEEN A DISASTER.
TOO MUCH.
IT'S BEEN A DISASTER.
TOO MUCH.
IT'S BEEN A DISASTER.
OVER
TOO MUCH.
IT'S BEEN A DISASTER.
OVER THE
TOO MUCH.
IT'S BEEN A DISASTER.
OVER THE PAST
TOO MUCH.
IT'S BEEN A DISASTER.
OVER THE PAST YEAR
TOO MUCH.
IT'S BEEN A DISASTER.
OVER THE PAST YEAR --
TOO MUCH.
IT'S BEEN A DISASTER.
OVER THE PAST YEAR -- THE
TOO MUCH.
IT'S BEEN A DISASTER.
OVER THE PAST YEAR -- THE CITY
IT'S BEEN A DISASTER.
OVER THE PAST YEAR -- THE CITY
IT'S BEEN A DISASTER.
OVER THE PAST YEAR -- THE CITY
HAS
IT'S BEEN A DISASTER.
OVER THE PAST YEAR -- THE CITY
HAS FACED
IT'S BEEN A DISASTER.
OVER THE PAST YEAR -- THE CITY
HAS FACED THE
IT'S BEEN A DISASTER.
OVER THE PAST YEAR -- THE CITY
HAS FACED THE CONSEQUENCES
OVER THE PAST YEAR -- THE CITY
HAS FACED THE CONSEQUENCES
OVER THE PAST YEAR -- THE CITY
HAS FACED THE CONSEQUENCES
--
OVER THE PAST YEAR -- THE CITY
HAS FACED THE CONSEQUENCES
-- UNION
OVER THE PAST YEAR -- THE CITY
HAS FACED THE CONSEQUENCES
-- UNION PRESIDENT
OVER THE PAST YEAR -- THE CITY
HAS FACED THE CONSEQUENCES
-- UNION PRESIDENT KEN
OVER THE PAST YEAR -- THE CITY
HAS FACED THE CONSEQUENCES
-- UNION PRESIDENT KEN CASADAY
HAS FACED THE CONSEQUENCES
-- UNION PRESIDENT KEN CASADAY
HAS FACED THE CONSEQUENCES
-- UNION PRESIDENT KEN CASADAY
SAYS,
HAS FACED THE CONSEQUENCES
-- UNION PRESIDENT KEN CASADAY
SAYS, INCLUDING
-- UNION PRESIDENT KEN CASADAY
SAYS, INCLUDING
-- UNION PRESIDENT KEN CASADAY
SAYS, INCLUDING
VETERAN
-- UNION PRESIDENT KEN CASADAY
SAYS, INCLUDING
VETERAN OFFICERS
-- UNION PRESIDENT KEN CASADAY
SAYS, INCLUDING
VETERAN OFFICERS LEAVING.
-- UNION PRESIDENT KEN CASADAY
SAYS, INCLUDING
VETERAN OFFICERS LEAVING. FROM
SAYS, INCLUDING
VETERAN OFFICERS LEAVING. FROM
SAYS, INCLUDING
VETERAN OFFICERS LEAVING. FROM
JANUARY
SAYS, INCLUDING
VETERAN OFFICERS LEAVING. FROM
JANUARY THROUGH
SAYS, INCLUDING
VETERAN OFFICERS LEAVING. FROM
JANUARY THROUGH SEPTEMBER
SAYS, INCLUDING
VETERAN OFFICERS LEAVING. FROM
JANUARY THROUGH SEPTEMBER 2016
VETERAN OFFICERS LEAVING. FROM
JANUARY THROUGH SEPTEMBER 2016
JANUARY THROUGH SEPTEMBER 2016
--
-- 49
-- 49 OFFICERS
-- 49 OFFICERS RESIGNED,
-- 49 OFFICERS RESIGNED, RETIRED
-- 49 OFFICERS RESIGNED, RETIRED
OR
-- 49 OFFICERS RESIGNED, RETIRED
OR WERE
-- 49 OFFICERS RESIGNED, RETIRED
OR WERE BOOTED
-- 49 OFFICERS RESIGNED, RETIRED
OR WERE BOOTED FROM
-- 49 OFFICERS RESIGNED, RETIRED
OR WERE BOOTED FROM THE
-- 49 OFFICERS RESIGNED, RETIRED
OR WERE BOOTED FROM THE
FORCE
-- 49 OFFICERS RESIGNED, RETIRED
OR WERE BOOTED FROM THE
FORCE --
-- 49 OFFICERS RESIGNED, RETIRED
OR WERE BOOTED FROM THE
FORCE -- A
-- 49 OFFICERS RESIGNED, RETIRED
OR WERE BOOTED FROM THE
FORCE -- A NUMBER
-- 49 OFFICERS RESIGNED, RETIRED
OR WERE BOOTED FROM THE
FORCE -- A NUMBER THAT
-- 49 OFFICERS RESIGNED, RETIRED
OR WERE BOOTED FROM THE
FORCE -- A NUMBER THAT JUMPED
-- 49 OFFICERS RESIGNED, RETIRED
OR WERE BOOTED FROM THE
FORCE -- A NUMBER THAT JUMPED TO
OR WERE BOOTED FROM THE
FORCE -- A NUMBER THAT JUMPED TO
OR WERE BOOTED FROM THE
FORCE -- A NUMBER THAT JUMPED TO
62
OR WERE BOOTED FROM THE
FORCE -- A NUMBER THAT JUMPED TO
62 LAST
OR WERE BOOTED FROM THE
FORCE -- A NUMBER THAT JUMPED TO
62 LAST YEAR
OR WERE BOOTED FROM THE
FORCE -- A NUMBER THAT JUMPED TO
62 LAST YEAR --
FORCE -- A NUMBER THAT JUMPED TO
62 LAST YEAR --
FORCE -- A NUMBER THAT JUMPED TO
62 LAST YEAR --
MANY
FORCE -- A NUMBER THAT JUMPED TO
62 LAST YEAR --
MANY IN
FORCE -- A NUMBER THAT JUMPED TO
62 LAST YEAR --
MANY IN DECEMBER
FORCE -- A NUMBER THAT JUMPED TO
62 LAST YEAR --
MANY IN DECEMBER --
FORCE -- A NUMBER THAT JUMPED TO
62 LAST YEAR --
MANY IN DECEMBER -- RIGHT
FORCE -- A NUMBER THAT JUMPED TO
62 LAST YEAR --
MANY IN DECEMBER -- RIGHT AFTER
62 LAST YEAR --
MANY IN DECEMBER -- RIGHT AFTER
62 LAST YEAR --
MANY IN DECEMBER -- RIGHT AFTER
THE
62 LAST YEAR --
MANY IN DECEMBER -- RIGHT AFTER
THE PROPOSED
MANY IN DECEMBER -- RIGHT AFTER
THE PROPOSED
MANY IN DECEMBER -- RIGHT AFTER
THE PROPOSED
CONTRACT
MANY IN DECEMBER -- RIGHT AFTER
THE PROPOSED
CONTRACT FAILED.
MANY IN DECEMBER -- RIGHT AFTER
THE PROPOSED
CONTRACT FAILED. THIS
MANY IN DECEMBER -- RIGHT AFTER
THE PROPOSED
CONTRACT FAILED. THIS YEAR
MANY IN DECEMBER -- RIGHT AFTER
THE PROPOSED
CONTRACT FAILED. THIS YEAR --
THE PROPOSED
CONTRACT FAILED. THIS YEAR --
THE PROPOSED
CONTRACT FAILED. THIS YEAR --
THERE
THE PROPOSED
CONTRACT FAILED. THIS YEAR --
THERE HAVE
THE PROPOSED
CONTRACT FAILED. THIS YEAR --
THERE HAVE BEEN
THE PROPOSED
CONTRACT FAILED. THIS YEAR --
THERE HAVE BEEN 78.
CONTRACT FAILED. THIS YEAR --
THERE HAVE BEEN 78.
CONTRACT FAILED. THIS YEAR --
THERE HAVE BEEN 78.
ADDITIONALLY
CONTRACT FAILED. THIS YEAR --
THERE HAVE BEEN 78.
ADDITIONALLY --
CONTRACT FAILED. THIS YEAR --
THERE HAVE BEEN 78.
ADDITIONALLY -- THE
CONTRACT FAILED. THIS YEAR --
THERE HAVE BEEN 78.
ADDITIONALLY -- THE CITY
CONTRACT FAILED. THIS YEAR --
THERE HAVE BEEN 78.
ADDITIONALLY -- THE CITY AND
THERE HAVE BEEN 78.
ADDITIONALLY -- THE CITY AND
THERE HAVE BEEN 78.
ADDITIONALLY -- THE CITY AND
POLICE
THERE HAVE BEEN 78.
ADDITIONALLY -- THE CITY AND
POLICE UNION
THERE HAVE BEEN 78.
ADDITIONALLY -- THE CITY AND
POLICE UNION ARE
THERE HAVE BEEN 78.
ADDITIONALLY -- THE CITY AND
POLICE UNION ARE NOW
ADDITIONALLY -- THE CITY AND
POLICE UNION ARE NOW
ADDITIONALLY -- THE CITY AND
POLICE UNION ARE NOW
ENTANGLED
ADDITIONALLY -- THE CITY AND
POLICE UNION ARE NOW
ENTANGLED IN
ADDITIONALLY -- THE CITY AND
POLICE UNION ARE NOW
ENTANGLED IN A
ADDITIONALLY -- THE CITY AND
POLICE UNION ARE NOW
ENTANGLED IN A LAWSUIT
ADDITIONALLY -- THE CITY AND
POLICE UNION ARE NOW
ENTANGLED IN A LAWSUIT OVER
ADDITIONALLY -- THE CITY AND
POLICE UNION ARE NOW
ENTANGLED IN A LAWSUIT OVER WHAT
POLICE UNION ARE NOW
ENTANGLED IN A LAWSUIT OVER WHAT
ENTANGLED IN A LAWSUIT OVER WHAT
RECORDS
RECORDS A
RECORDS A CIVILIAN
RECORDS A CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT
RECORDS A CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT
GROUP
RECORDS A CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT
GROUP MAY
RECORDS A CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT
GROUP MAY VIEW
RECORDS A CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT
GROUP MAY VIEW WITH
RECORDS A CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT
GROUP MAY VIEW WITH NO
RECORDS A CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT
GROUP MAY VIEW WITH NO CONTRACT
RECORDS A CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT
GROUP MAY VIEW WITH NO CONTRACT
IN
GROUP MAY VIEW WITH NO CONTRACT
IN
GROUP MAY VIEW WITH NO CONTRACT
IN
PLACE.
IN
PLACE.
IN
PLACE.
UNDER
IN
PLACE.
UNDER THE
IN
PLACE.
UNDER THE NEW
IN
PLACE.
UNDER THE NEW PROPOSED
IN
PLACE.
UNDER THE NEW PROPOSED AGREEMENT
PLACE.
UNDER THE NEW PROPOSED AGREEMENT
PLACE.
UNDER THE NEW PROPOSED AGREEMENT
--
PLACE.
UNDER THE NEW PROPOSED AGREEMENT
-- OFFICERS
PLACE.
UNDER THE NEW PROPOSED AGREEMENT
-- OFFICERS WILL
UNDER THE NEW PROPOSED AGREEMENT
-- OFFICERS WILL
UNDER THE NEW PROPOSED AGREEMENT
-- OFFICERS WILL
GET
UNDER THE NEW PROPOSED AGREEMENT
-- OFFICERS WILL
GET RAISES
UNDER THE NEW PROPOSED AGREEMENT
-- OFFICERS WILL
GET RAISES TOTALING
UNDER THE NEW PROPOSED AGREEMENT
-- OFFICERS WILL
GET RAISES TOTALING 40-
UNDER THE NEW PROPOSED AGREEMENT
-- OFFICERS WILL
GET RAISES TOTALING 40- MILLION
-- OFFICERS WILL
GET RAISES TOTALING 40- MILLION
-- OFFICERS WILL
GET RAISES TOTALING 40- MILLION
OVER
-- OFFICERS WILL
GET RAISES TOTALING 40- MILLION
OVER FOUR
-- OFFICERS WILL
GET RAISES TOTALING 40- MILLION
OVER FOUR YEARS,
GET RAISES TOTALING 40- MILLION
OVER FOUR YEARS,
GET RAISES TOTALING 40- MILLION
OVER FOUR YEARS,
AND
GET RAISES TOTALING 40- MILLION
OVER FOUR YEARS,
AND THE
GET RAISES TOTALING 40- MILLION
OVER FOUR YEARS,
AND THE POLICE
GET RAISES TOTALING 40- MILLION
OVER FOUR YEARS,
AND THE POLICE UNION
GET RAISES TOTALING 40- MILLION
OVER FOUR YEARS,
AND THE POLICE UNION HAS
GET RAISES TOTALING 40- MILLION
OVER FOUR YEARS,
AND THE POLICE UNION HAS AGREED
OVER FOUR YEARS,
AND THE POLICE UNION HAS AGREED
OVER FOUR YEARS,
AND THE POLICE UNION HAS AGREED
TO
OVER FOUR YEARS,
AND THE POLICE UNION HAS AGREED
TO DROP
OVER FOUR YEARS,
AND THE POLICE UNION HAS AGREED
TO DROP ITS
OVER FOUR YEARS,
AND THE POLICE UNION HAS AGREED
TO DROP ITS SUIT
AND THE POLICE UNION HAS AGREED
TO DROP ITS SUIT
AND THE POLICE UNION HAS AGREED
TO DROP ITS SUIT
AGAINST
AND THE POLICE UNION HAS AGREED
TO DROP ITS SUIT
AGAINST THE
AND THE POLICE UNION HAS AGREED
TO DROP ITS SUIT
AGAINST THE CITY.
AND THE POLICE UNION HAS AGREED
TO DROP ITS SUIT
AGAINST THE CITY. OFFICERS
AND THE POLICE UNION HAS AGREED
TO DROP ITS SUIT
AGAINST THE CITY. OFFICERS ALSO
TO DROP ITS SUIT
AGAINST THE CITY. OFFICERS ALSO
TO DROP ITS SUIT
AGAINST THE CITY. OFFICERS ALSO
WOULD
TO DROP ITS SUIT
AGAINST THE CITY. OFFICERS ALSO
WOULD GET
TO DROP ITS SUIT
AGAINST THE CITY. OFFICERS ALSO
WOULD GET STIPEND
AGAINST THE CITY. OFFICERS ALSO
WOULD GET STIPEND
AGAINST THE CITY. OFFICERS ALSO
WOULD GET STIPEND
PAY
AGAINST THE CITY. OFFICERS ALSO
WOULD GET STIPEND
PAY FOR
AGAINST THE CITY. OFFICERS ALSO
WOULD GET STIPEND
PAY FOR SPECIAL
AGAINST THE CITY. OFFICERS ALSO
WOULD GET STIPEND
PAY FOR SPECIAL SKILLS
WOULD GET STIPEND
PAY FOR SPECIAL SKILLS
WOULD GET STIPEND
PAY FOR SPECIAL SKILLS
REINSTATED,
WOULD GET STIPEND
PAY FOR SPECIAL SKILLS
REINSTATED, AND
WOULD GET STIPEND
PAY FOR SPECIAL SKILLS
REINSTATED, AND THE
WOULD GET STIPEND
PAY FOR SPECIAL SKILLS
REINSTATED, AND THE CITY
PAY FOR SPECIAL SKILLS
REINSTATED, AND THE CITY
PAY FOR SPECIAL SKILLS
REINSTATED, AND THE CITY
GAINS
PAY FOR SPECIAL SKILLS
REINSTATED, AND THE CITY
GAINS MORE
PAY FOR SPECIAL SKILLS
REINSTATED, AND THE CITY
GAINS MORE FLEXIBILITY
PAY FOR SPECIAL SKILLS
REINSTATED, AND THE CITY
GAINS MORE FLEXIBILITY IN
PAY FOR SPECIAL SKILLS
REINSTATED, AND THE CITY
GAINS MORE FLEXIBILITY IN HIRING
REINSTATED, AND THE CITY
GAINS MORE FLEXIBILITY IN HIRING
REINSTATED, AND THE CITY
GAINS MORE FLEXIBILITY IN HIRING
AND
REINSTATED, AND THE CITY
GAINS MORE FLEXIBILITY IN HIRING
AND PROMOTIONS.
GAINS MORE FLEXIBILITY IN HIRING
AND PROMOTIONS.
GAINS MORE FLEXIBILITY IN HIRING
AND PROMOTIONS.
CHAS
GAINS MORE FLEXIBILITY IN HIRING
AND PROMOTIONS.
CHAS MOORE,
GAINS MORE FLEXIBILITY IN HIRING
AND PROMOTIONS.
CHAS MOORE, LEADER
GAINS MORE FLEXIBILITY IN HIRING
AND PROMOTIONS.
CHAS MOORE, LEADER OF
GAINS MORE FLEXIBILITY IN HIRING
AND PROMOTIONS.
CHAS MOORE, LEADER OF THE
GAINS MORE FLEXIBILITY IN HIRING
AND PROMOTIONS.
CHAS MOORE, LEADER OF THE AUSTIN
AND PROMOTIONS.
CHAS MOORE, LEADER OF THE AUSTIN
AND PROMOTIONS.
CHAS MOORE, LEADER OF THE AUSTIN
JUSTICE
AND PROMOTIONS.
CHAS MOORE, LEADER OF THE AUSTIN
JUSTICE COALITION,
AND PROMOTIONS.
CHAS MOORE, LEADER OF THE AUSTIN
JUSTICE COALITION, IS
CHAS MOORE, LEADER OF THE AUSTIN
JUSTICE COALITION, IS
CHAS MOORE, LEADER OF THE AUSTIN
JUSTICE COALITION, IS
AMONG
CHAS MOORE, LEADER OF THE AUSTIN
JUSTICE COALITION, IS
AMONG THOSE
CHAS MOORE, LEADER OF THE AUSTIN
JUSTICE COALITION, IS
AMONG THOSE WHO
CHAS MOORE, LEADER OF THE AUSTIN
JUSTICE COALITION, IS
AMONG THOSE WHO FOUGHT
CHAS MOORE, LEADER OF THE AUSTIN
JUSTICE COALITION, IS
AMONG THOSE WHO FOUGHT AGAINST
JUSTICE COALITION, IS
AMONG THOSE WHO FOUGHT AGAINST
JUSTICE COALITION, IS
AMONG THOSE WHO FOUGHT AGAINST
THE
JUSTICE COALITION, IS
AMONG THOSE WHO FOUGHT AGAINST
THE LAST
JUSTICE COALITION, IS
AMONG THOSE WHO FOUGHT AGAINST
THE LAST CONTRACT.
AMONG THOSE WHO FOUGHT AGAINST
THE LAST CONTRACT.
AMONG THOSE WHO FOUGHT AGAINST
THE LAST CONTRACT.
HE
AMONG THOSE WHO FOUGHT AGAINST
THE LAST CONTRACT.
HE SAYS
AMONG THOSE WHO FOUGHT AGAINST
THE LAST CONTRACT.
HE SAYS HE
AMONG THOSE WHO FOUGHT AGAINST
THE LAST CONTRACT.
HE SAYS HE REALIZES
AMONG THOSE WHO FOUGHT AGAINST
THE LAST CONTRACT.
HE SAYS HE REALIZES THAT
THE LAST CONTRACT.
HE SAYS HE REALIZES THAT
THE LAST CONTRACT.
HE SAYS HE REALIZES THAT
OFFICERS'
THE LAST CONTRACT.
HE SAYS HE REALIZES THAT
OFFICERS' WALLETS
THE LAST CONTRACT.
HE SAYS HE REALIZES THAT
OFFICERS' WALLETS HAVE
HE SAYS HE REALIZES THAT
OFFICERS' WALLETS HAVE
HE SAYS HE REALIZES THAT
OFFICERS' WALLETS HAVE
SUFFERED,
HE SAYS HE REALIZES THAT
OFFICERS' WALLETS HAVE
SUFFERED, AND
HE SAYS HE REALIZES THAT
OFFICERS' WALLETS HAVE
SUFFERED, AND THAT
HE SAYS HE REALIZES THAT
OFFICERS' WALLETS HAVE
SUFFERED, AND THAT THE
OFFICERS' WALLETS HAVE
SUFFERED, AND THAT THE
OFFICERS' WALLETS HAVE
SUFFERED, AND THAT THE
DEPARTMENT
OFFICERS' WALLETS HAVE
SUFFERED, AND THAT THE
DEPARTMENT HAS
OFFICERS' WALLETS HAVE
SUFFERED, AND THAT THE
DEPARTMENT HAS LOST
SUFFERED, AND THAT THE
DEPARTMENT HAS LOST
SUFFERED, AND THAT THE
DEPARTMENT HAS LOST
OFFICERS.
DEPARTMENT HAS LOST
OFFICERS.
DEPARTMENT HAS LOST
OFFICERS.
BUT
DEPARTMENT HAS LOST
OFFICERS.
BUT HE
DEPARTMENT HAS LOST
OFFICERS.
BUT HE SAYS
DEPARTMENT HAS LOST
OFFICERS.
BUT HE SAYS HE
DEPARTMENT HAS LOST
OFFICERS.
BUT HE SAYS HE THINKS
DEPARTMENT HAS LOST
OFFICERS.
BUT HE SAYS HE THINKS THERE
DEPARTMENT HAS LOST
OFFICERS.
BUT HE SAYS HE THINKS THERE HAS
OFFICERS.
BUT HE SAYS HE THINKS THERE HAS
OFFICERS.
BUT HE SAYS HE THINKS THERE HAS
BEEN
OFFICERS.
BUT HE SAYS HE THINKS THERE HAS
BEEN A
OFFICERS.
BUT HE SAYS HE THINKS THERE HAS
BEEN A BENEFIT.
BUT HE SAYS HE THINKS THERE HAS
BEEN A BENEFIT.
BUT HE SAYS HE THINKS THERE HAS
BEEN A BENEFIT.
"IT
BUT HE SAYS HE THINKS THERE HAS
BEEN A BENEFIT.
"IT REALLY
BUT HE SAYS HE THINKS THERE HAS
BEEN A BENEFIT.
"IT REALLY CREATED
BUT HE SAYS HE THINKS THERE HAS
BEEN A BENEFIT.
"IT REALLY CREATED A
BUT HE SAYS HE THINKS THERE HAS
BEEN A BENEFIT.
"IT REALLY CREATED A SPACE
BUT HE SAYS HE THINKS THERE HAS
BEEN A BENEFIT.
"IT REALLY CREATED A SPACE IN
BEEN A BENEFIT.
"IT REALLY CREATED A SPACE IN
BEEN A BENEFIT.
"IT REALLY CREATED A SPACE IN
THE
BEEN A BENEFIT.
"IT REALLY CREATED A SPACE IN
THE ROOM
BEEN A BENEFIT.
"IT REALLY CREATED A SPACE IN
THE ROOM FOR
BEEN A BENEFIT.
"IT REALLY CREATED A SPACE IN
THE ROOM FOR THE
BEEN A BENEFIT.
"IT REALLY CREATED A SPACE IN
THE ROOM FOR THE OFFICERS
BEEN A BENEFIT.
"IT REALLY CREATED A SPACE IN
THE ROOM FOR THE OFFICERS AND
"IT REALLY CREATED A SPACE IN
THE ROOM FOR THE OFFICERS AND
"IT REALLY CREATED A SPACE IN
THE ROOM FOR THE OFFICERS AND
THE
"IT REALLY CREATED A SPACE IN
THE ROOM FOR THE OFFICERS AND
THE POLICE
"IT REALLY CREATED A SPACE IN
THE ROOM FOR THE OFFICERS AND
THE POLICE UNION
"IT REALLY CREATED A SPACE IN
THE ROOM FOR THE OFFICERS AND
THE POLICE UNION TO
"IT REALLY CREATED A SPACE IN
THE ROOM FOR THE OFFICERS AND
THE POLICE UNION TO UNDERSTAND
THE ROOM FOR THE OFFICERS AND
THE POLICE UNION TO UNDERSTAND
THE ROOM FOR THE OFFICERS AND
THE POLICE UNION TO UNDERSTAND
WHERE
THE ROOM FOR THE OFFICERS AND
THE POLICE UNION TO UNDERSTAND
WHERE WE
THE ROOM FOR THE OFFICERS AND
THE POLICE UNION TO UNDERSTAND
WHERE WE ARE
THE ROOM FOR THE OFFICERS AND
THE POLICE UNION TO UNDERSTAND
WHERE WE ARE COMING
THE ROOM FOR THE OFFICERS AND
THE POLICE UNION TO UNDERSTAND
WHERE WE ARE COMING FROM
THE POLICE UNION TO UNDERSTAND
WHERE WE ARE COMING FROM
THE POLICE UNION TO UNDERSTAND
WHERE WE ARE COMING FROM
WHEN
THE POLICE UNION TO UNDERSTAND
WHERE WE ARE COMING FROM
WHEN WE
THE POLICE UNION TO UNDERSTAND
WHERE WE ARE COMING FROM
WHEN WE TALK
THE POLICE UNION TO UNDERSTAND
WHERE WE ARE COMING FROM
WHEN WE TALK ABOUT
THE POLICE UNION TO UNDERSTAND
WHERE WE ARE COMING FROM
WHEN WE TALK ABOUT TRANSPARENCY
WHERE WE ARE COMING FROM
WHEN WE TALK ABOUT TRANSPARENCY
WHERE WE ARE COMING FROM
WHEN WE TALK ABOUT TRANSPARENCY
AND
WHEN WE TALK ABOUT TRANSPARENCY
AND
WHEN WE TALK ABOUT TRANSPARENCY
AND
ACCOUNTABILITY."
AND
ACCOUNTABILITY."
AND
ACCOUNTABILITY."
ON
AND
ACCOUNTABILITY."
ON THURSDAY
AND
ACCOUNTABILITY."
ON THURSDAY --
AND
ACCOUNTABILITY."
ON THURSDAY -- HE
AND
ACCOUNTABILITY."
ON THURSDAY -- HE SAYS
AND
ACCOUNTABILITY."
ON THURSDAY -- HE SAYS HE
AND
ACCOUNTABILITY."
ON THURSDAY -- HE SAYS HE PLANS
ACCOUNTABILITY."
ON THURSDAY -- HE SAYS HE PLANS
ACCOUNTABILITY."
ON THURSDAY -- HE SAYS HE PLANS
TO
ACCOUNTABILITY."
ON THURSDAY -- HE SAYS HE PLANS
TO VOICE
ACCOUNTABILITY."
ON THURSDAY -- HE SAYS HE PLANS
TO VOICE HIS
ACCOUNTABILITY."
ON THURSDAY -- HE SAYS HE PLANS
TO VOICE HIS SUPPORT
ACCOUNTABILITY."
ON THURSDAY -- HE SAYS HE PLANS
TO VOICE HIS SUPPORT OF
ACCOUNTABILITY."
ON THURSDAY -- HE SAYS HE PLANS
TO VOICE HIS SUPPORT OF THE
ON THURSDAY -- HE SAYS HE PLANS
TO VOICE HIS SUPPORT OF THE
ON THURSDAY -- HE SAYS HE PLANS
TO VOICE HIS SUPPORT OF THE
CONTRACT.
TO VOICE HIS SUPPORT OF THE
CONTRACT.
CONTRACT.
CONTRACT.

POLICE
CONTRACT.

POLICE OFFICERS
CONTRACT.

POLICE OFFICERS WILL
CONTRACT.

POLICE OFFICERS WILL WRAP
CONTRACT.

POLICE OFFICERS WILL WRAP UP
POLICE OFFICERS WILL WRAP UP
POLICE OFFICERS WILL WRAP UP
THEIR
POLICE OFFICERS WILL WRAP UP
THEIR VOTE
POLICE OFFICERS WILL WRAP UP
THEIR VOTE ON
POLICE OFFICERS WILL WRAP UP
THEIR VOTE ON THE
POLICE OFFICERS WILL WRAP UP
THEIR VOTE ON THE
AGREEMENT
POLICE OFFICERS WILL WRAP UP
THEIR VOTE ON THE
AGREEMENT BY
POLICE OFFICERS WILL WRAP UP
THEIR VOTE ON THE
AGREEMENT BY 10
POLICE OFFICERS WILL WRAP UP
THEIR VOTE ON THE
AGREEMENT BY 10 TOMORROW
POLICE OFFICERS WILL WRAP UP
THEIR VOTE ON THE
AGREEMENT BY 10 TOMORROW MORNING
THEIR VOTE ON THE
AGREEMENT BY 10 TOMORROW MORNING
THEIR VOTE ON THE
AGREEMENT BY 10 TOMORROW MORNING
--
THEIR VOTE ON THE
AGREEMENT BY 10 TOMORROW MORNING
-- JUST
THEIR VOTE ON THE
AGREEMENT BY 10 TOMORROW MORNING
-- JUST IN
THEIR VOTE ON THE
AGREEMENT BY 10 TOMORROW MORNING
-- JUST IN TIME
THEIR VOTE ON THE
AGREEMENT BY 10 TOMORROW MORNING
-- JUST IN TIME FOR
THEIR VOTE ON THE
AGREEMENT BY 10 TOMORROW MORNING
-- JUST IN TIME FOR CITY
AGREEMENT BY 10 TOMORROW MORNING
-- JUST IN TIME FOR CITY
AGREEMENT BY 10 TOMORROW MORNING
-- JUST IN TIME FOR CITY
COUNCIL
AGREEMENT BY 10 TOMORROW MORNING
-- JUST IN TIME FOR CITY
COUNCIL MEMBERS
AGREEMENT BY 10 TOMORROW MORNING
-- JUST IN TIME FOR CITY
COUNCIL MEMBERS TO
AGREEMENT BY 10 TOMORROW MORNING
-- JUST IN TIME FOR CITY
COUNCIL MEMBERS TO CONSIDER
AGREEMENT BY 10 TOMORROW MORNING
-- JUST IN TIME FOR CITY
COUNCIL MEMBERS TO CONSIDER THE
-- JUST IN TIME FOR CITY
COUNCIL MEMBERS TO CONSIDER THE
-- JUST IN TIME FOR CITY
COUNCIL MEMBERS TO CONSIDER THE
TENTATIVE
COUNCIL MEMBERS TO CONSIDER THE
TENTATIVE
COUNCIL MEMBERS TO CONSIDER THE
TENTATIVE
CONTRACT
COUNCIL MEMBERS TO CONSIDER THE
TENTATIVE
CONTRACT AT
COUNCIL MEMBERS TO CONSIDER THE
TENTATIVE
CONTRACT AT THEIR
COUNCIL MEMBERS TO CONSIDER THE
TENTATIVE
CONTRACT AT THEIR MEETING.
TENTATIVE
CONTRACT AT THEIR MEETING.
