Dear fellow countrymen, 
and dear foreign friends, since I've
noticed in this audience the presence of
many reprensentatives  from neighboring
nations, all most dear to us,
Dear fellow countrymen, 
I've come to Orange via Poitiers!
The Party of In-nocence and myself
regard the action undertaken by a group
of young men and women of Generation
Identitaire who, for a few hours, occupied
the rooftop of the future Grand Mosque of
Poitiers, as highly commendable and worthy of praise
We are full of admiration for their courage,
of course, for their patriotism, their
commitment to our civilization, for their
refusal to see the latter overwhelmed by
any others whose value would not match
our own, at least not in our opinion, and
anyway not in here, not on the very
territory of our fatherland, and we are also
full of admiration for their intelligence,
and, if I may say so, for their in-nocence. 
For their intelligence, because of all the
actions they could have engaged to try
and rouse our people stunned and
dazzled by continual indoctrination, none
could have been more judiciously
selected than this one. 
The name of Poitiers, even after fifty years
of organized oblivion by school curricula,
still carries its strong historical
significance. 
And so does the name of Charles Martel 
(Besides, allow me to make a pause here
to say that I totally disagree on this point
with my friend Elisabeth Lévy, the editor
of the on-line magazine Causeur, who in a
recently published chronicle seemed to
imply that the battle of Poitiers was a
historical myth, as if it had never taken
place at all, a point of view I fail to understand.)
undeniable historical fact, when sizeable
armies clashed on the battle field and we
certainly should not allow each and every
major event in our national history and
their hallmark significance slip away into
the realm of hazy, doubtful myths 
True enough, Charles Martel took this
name a long time after this event, and it
He have already been stripped of the
Gauls, we’re not going to let them take Poitiers from us. 
stuck on him precisely in memory of the
battle itself, yet this battle is an
Furthermore the mosque in question is
still only a construction site, the party of
In-inocence wrote in an enthusiastic press
release, it was not a consecrated place of
worship yet, and therefore demonstrators
who occupied the place for a brief while
could not be accused of desecrating such
place. 
But soon came the retort: We didn’t know
what we were talking about, a mosque is
NOT to be dedicated or consecrated
anyhow – there is not a “before” and a
“after” consecration for such places,
Allah is to be worshiped everywhere, at
any time and in any place, there was no
boundaries between the sacred and the
profane, we were told, no borberline
between religious and civilian life, no
partition between the consecrated and the
secular. 
Our own retort to these objections is to
say that’s precisely where the problem lies with Islam ! 
As far as our ignorance of Islam is
concerned, we plead guilty — this is not
of our religion, not our culture, not our
civilization. 
This does not prevent us from recognizing
its own greatness, the mighty beauty of its
highest achievements, the masterpieces it
has produced in the field of poetry,
mysticism, music, applied arts,
architecture itself. 
However, the future Poitiers Mosque,
whether religiously dedicated or not, does
not look much like a masterpiece of
architecture. 
Its architectural style rather seems to
epitomize that imitative and pastiche
architectural efforts colonizers willingly
engage in foreign land to recall
themselves their country of origin in a
lame, replicative, homesickedly evocative way.
Anyway, to our knowledge, no damage
was done to this mosque structure. 
This is how the intelligence of our heroes,
borne out and evidenced by their highly
symbolic choice of place and time for
their action, can be effectively
characterized as in-nocent. 
In-nocence, as you know, means not to
hurt or harm unnecessarily, not to be
obnoxious, not to nocer, from latin
nocere, meaning to cause damages, not to
cause nuisances, whether against people
or properties, not to cause injury to the
cultural or natural heritage. 
By contrast, nocence is of course the very
fact of causing harm or injury, nocer,
causing damage, abusing, assaulting,
frightening people, vandalizing, causing
destructions and polluting the
environment.
La nocence va des fameuses incivilités,
dont la profusion gâche la vie des voisins
et des riverains et bien souvent les oblige
à fuir vers d’autres parages, jusqu’à la
violence armée, le terrorisme et cette
mystérieuse ultraviolence inédite, on se
demande pourquoi, dont le complexe
médiatico-politique s’étonne qu’on ne l’ait
pas observée plus tôt au sein de notre
histoire et de notre peuple, même dans le
cadre du traditionnel, hélas, grand
banditisme. 
C’est pour avoir suggéré, dans un
discours itititulé “La nocence, instrument
du Grand Remplacement”, prononcé il y a
deux ans aux Assises sur l’islamisation
de nos pays, que la nocence,
l’ultra-nuisance, l’ultra-violence,
l’importunité et l’agressivité continuelles,
l’insécurité, en somme, comme disent les
journaux, loin d’être une somme de cas
particuliers qu’il fallait laisser traiter par la
police et la justice — lesquels s’en
montrent bien incapables vous l’aurez
remarqué — étaient l’instrument même du
changement de peuple, de la conquête
territoriale, de la colonisation, et
relevaient en conséquence, et par
excellence, de la politique et non pas de la
police, de l’histoire et non pas de
l’administration de la justice, du choc des
civilisations et non pas de l’étude d’une
quelconque insatisfaction sociale, de la
guerre en un mot et non pas de la
sociologie, c’est pour avoir suggéré cela,
donc, que je suis aujourd’hui poursuivi,
traîné devant les tribunaux, menacé
d’amende et de prison. 
C’est peu de chose, apparemment,
comparé à ce qui se fomente en haut lieu
contre les martelliens de Poitiers. 
Voilà des garçons et des filles qui n’ont
rien détérioré, qui n’ont agressé
personne, qui sont simplement monté sur
le toit d'un bâtiment en construction pour
y déployer des banderoles et y parler
dans un porte-voix, qui n’ont fait que
réclamer une consultation du peuple
c’est-à-dire, officiellement, ce qu’il y a de
plus démocratique dans notre
République, qui ne se sont livrés à aucun
chantage, qui n’ont opposé aucune
résistance aux forces de police, bref dont
le comportement a été exemplaire de bout
en bout et, j’y reviens, rigoureusement in-nocent. 
Il est vrai qu’ils ont pénétré dans un local
qui ne leur appartenait pas et ont procédé
à une manifestation sans avertissement
préalable. 
On conviendra que ce sont là péchés
véniels, surtout s’agissant d'un bâtiment
public dont la construction mobilise,
directement ou indirectement, beaucoup d’argent public. 
Surtout, ce qui est frappant, ce qui frappe
tout le monde, c’est la formidable
différence de traitement dont témoignent
les réactions policières, judiciaires,
politiques à cette action pacifique,
in-nocente, et, en comparaison, celles qui
accueillent invariablement des nocences
quotidiennes qui ont pour elles d’être
perpétrées, elles, par les enfants chéris de
l’antiracisme dogmatique, ses protégés
adorés, qui, s’il leur arrive d’agir mal, eux,
c’est uniquement la faute de la condition
sociale qui leur est faite, de l’injustice
dont ils sont victimes, du racisme, en
somme, de sorte que plus la race
présumée raciste est victime, plus elle est coupable.
coupable. 
Les torts qu’elle subit ne sont qu’une
chose, la preuve des torts qu’elle inflige. 
