In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court
legalized abortion nationwide.
The decision is called Roe vs Wade, and
those who defend it are known as RoeBots.
This is how they think...
* Robot Voice *
In the first place, if the word “potential” 
is suggesting that the unborn
are only potentially alive,
that is easily disproved.
Even in the earliest stages of pregnancy,
sonograms show movements and heartbeats 
that do not belong to the woman.
So no matter what kind of rhetoric 
someone uses to describe the unborn,
it is impossible to logically
argue that they are not alive.
Beyond that, only through 
mind-numbing stupidity
could someone suggest that a human 
female can be pregnant with something
that is only potentially human.
I mean, for that to be true, it would 
have to be possible for human sperm
and human eggs to unite and 
produce some other form of life.
Perhaps a parrot or a spider.
Now I could be wrong, but I’m pretty 
sure nothing like that ever happened.
As uncomfortable as it may be for 
the pro-choice crowd to accept,
the biological reality is that 
when a woman is pregnant,
she is always pregnant with 
another human being.
So while it may be reasonable to 
say that a fetus has the potential
to become a major league baseball 
player or a high school math teacher,
it is pure idiocy to say that a fetus 
is only a potential human being.
If for no other reason,
the unborn are living human beings 
because that is the only thing they can be.
The fact is, people who push 
this “potential life” nonsense
in order to rationalize abortion
are no different than these neo-Nazis who
claim that the holocaust never happened.
Both groups have created their own alternative realities
in which they simply choose to believe 
what is convenient to believe,
and ignore any evidence to the contrary no 
matter how indisputable that evidence might be.
Any way you cut it,
holocaust deniers and pro-choice biology 
deniers are cut from the exact same cloth.
Thanks For Watching!
