

Lift-Off

Published by Jean-Nichol Dufour at Smashwords

Copyright 2011-2018 Jean-Nichol Dufour

Sunrise edition

TABLE OF CONTENT

THE TREE OF DREAMS

10-LIFT-OFF

1/4

2/4

3/4

INTERNODE

First things first

This is part 6 of a suite forming the book "A Flower To Life". It's a fictional story I decided to make available as a suite because it is too long or too big for most book sites on the net. I will eventually try publishing as paperback, again, but for now it seems it's not the style literary agents want to see, it's too long, too big, very bad English, not fitting their market or what they like to read; I never got a criticism about content. In fact, after trying for a year I'm sure nobody in the publishing industry ever read it. Now that you know how bad it is since connoisseurs judged it so while complaining they get nothing special to read, I'll talk about the killing point; I want free digital copies available to anybody, and that is impossible, even if I let the publisher have all the profits they can manage to gain from selling it as paperback (and digital too). So I separated the book as a suite to distribute it freely on Smashwords, while the book as a whole will be sold on Amazon (Amazon Canada deleted my profile, so I removed my work, not that I sold many, 1 copy...), and nobody except me touches the text. I know that literary agents are a bit right about my "very bad English", but it's part of their job to see potential and help, not push people to self-publishing, which it's sure not something I can afford. For now I don't take it too badly because my work is about starting a new reality on earth, it must cover a vast range of hard philosophical, spiritual, personal, psychological, political and fundamental subjects, and gaining all round competence with all that will require lots of time and quite a few updates to get right, particularly with the casual style I have chosen. While some (I wonder who...) will argue about my style, I believe I have chosen the fastest and best route to get my arguments read by a maximum of people, I want my work as the adventure of a guy battling a whole reality in a realist way. As for the why I want an independent source free, it is because I know this will be a unique and rare artefact, and I don't want anybody to take control of it after I'm dead. I want a place where my profile and my work can remain available after my death in its integrity of form, even if a transfer of platform becomes necessary. I accept that people make any variation of it if it's not for bad intents or self-interests, but the original must remain integral. And one last thing, up to the flower edition, I swear upon all the entities I believe in that all my work is free of external influence that I know of (maybe except gods); it is all the invention, imagination and deductions of someone who was curious and interested in science when young, and forced to a religion as a kid. My work has arisen from my experience and judgment of reality as I interacted with it, so no book on religion has been opened, no books on the mind, no book on psychology or philosophy and internet searches may be limited to a few details.

THE TREE OF DREAMS

I met that tree in a dream, and it seems to be a shortcut to other dreams. I think, but I'm missing parts so I'm not sure. It's a big twisted tree; the base is holed in as an old camp, it is full of trapdoors, secrets and little rooms, some brand new, leading down and up everywhere on and in brambles. But I don't see any of this the first time; it looked like a demolished and abandoned place. Old planks and dust, an old rusted bed of spring, a turned aside bathtub, it's dark and I'm tired so I sleep on the springs but I end-up in another place, a land I visited a few times. Normally I get to this place from a vast, half desert bushy plain with an end of sight gravel road that runs down from a red mountain on my back. I can go there on a mean of transportation, going through a gate, paying 20$ I think, or I must go on foot, traversing the whole plain, I did once, but I normally end up in a pick-up or 4 wheeler. I did a few bizarre fishing trips there and very strange adventures I don't remember well, the place seems infinite, I just make the dreams of one or the other part, which I know connected from old dreams.

There is a northern snowy area which I landed in from the tree, it was for a fishing and camp infiltration game. There is a marsh area far to the south too, I tried to enter twice (in other dreams) but failed, it's an unknown marshy place under boiling heat with a few high trees. I'm always following a trail but the place is so dangerous and the sky so low that you just make a mistake and you feel secure enough that you're better turn around, and forget that giant black beast of a moose monster you were following. And that's what happens each time; something attracts my attention and I lose the trail, then I'm almost running back to the beginning, all the way through the desert plain and past the "go" gate to wake-up.

As for the tree of dreams, I remember another visit where I ended-up jammed crammed in 4 foot box waiting for the tree to grow a bramble and permit an exit. I ended-up in the feeling dimension in a too small garden for me with too small humans for the garden. I was there to learn the ways of the place I think, in an institution which was a mental-emotional puzzle, built between a rank of giant carrots and a rank of giant small flowers. Everything is solid in the place, but the size is far smaller, you are a resized version of yourself that deal integrity of matter from emotion solidity I could say. When you are "to size" the institution is a 3 story big white old and long but well-kept building. But I know I'm big because as soon as I get out of the "barge" front door, my vision switch high, but as a spotlight view, and I can't move, I see a bit of a garden, see the front of the institution that is aligned between "ranks" of vegetables, and I see a part of another home. I think the other home got a "to size garden" I can go to, there is a black haired woman working in it, I seems to know her but I remember nothing of the house.

The big building's inside all seem like an illusion; you feel the place is full of secrets. It's hard to affect things, you know the building is real, nothing is distorted, but things change. I noticed I was walking in a large corridor and no door on either side of me, I felt that, I didn't say there are no doors, I noticed it unconsciously. You do your things like everything is normal, because you know it's part of what you have to do, it's like walking in a school corridor, you do your business of walking in the corridor, that's how dreams see things too, but the morning light hitting the floor was not there the last time I think, but it seems real, so it must be and it seems to be.

The people feel very real though, dressed in black robes, they may be around 10, strangers, only the young blonde is helping me, but I feel all the rest are watching me from the corner of their eyes. I have almost no interaction with her, except that I cross her and she makes me feel what I should see but not on the spot, it's like I must carry the feeling along with me until I meet the situation leading me to "see" the things that are worth my effort at disturbing. The blond "led" me through a trap on the roof that I felt importantly attracted to, and I ended up in a vast garage debarras, playing a bit in it, finding things that invoked feelings, finally ending-up in a small room that I understood as the room of the blond woman, a strangely formed room, like a rectangle from which you chopped the two top corners half from bottom and half middle top, it seems to be floating in another dimension inside the mass of things. Yellow lighting, blue bed, a desk, and tons of books, it's like a rare paradise, I felt like I passed years reading these books until everybody forgot I existed.

Here is another dream related to the tree, the view of the land is the same spotlight vision. It's a gray waste with a cliff in the middle that is floating in darkness. There was this monster that kept visiting me from dreams to dreams, in a flashback kind of way. He is green and looks like a 4 foot hulk. He comes in my room in dreams where I sleep (in the dream). He never does anything except rummaging through my things and eating the more expensive stuff, waking me up, but I'm not scared of him.

The last time, I was in a mud hut when he woke me up. In the morning I asked people living around if they ever saw him, and they told me that he came from the castle up the cliff, and that the fourth visit you receive, he eats you. I tell them I'll kill him tonight and I go to my laboratory in a cave and start working on my weapon while some people follow me to look at what I'm doing.

I make a gold plated 10 feet pole with a blender tool at one tip and a gas lawnmower motor at the other end. I'm ready and it's night. The people up the cliff are having a sex party tonight so I start climbing the cliff totally nude, it's incredibly hard, I'm slipping, cutting myself, rocks break away and when I look down, I see a sea of people doing the same thing as me. When I finally reach the top, the castle is besieged, there are bloody nudists everywhere. I go to the windy tip of the cliff and I plant myself there while holding my pole like a flag. I move it slightly in the wind, it's making a "woohoo" noise and slowly I see people rejoining me out of the night and their successful battle.

Suddenly here comes the monster and he has totally changed, he is now a thin, pink gigantic monster with small white spots all over the body. He is covered in some kind of disgusting goo like if you took half a barrel of transparent goo jelly, then mix in the other half with boogers. He's got a strange mouth with only a few short teeth, he's coming at me open mouthed and I stuff my pole in it and up his brain, I've got him planted there for a moment until my motor almost stalls, so I get it out and he start at me again so I plant it a second time in the same way and I plant the pole in the ground, bringing it straight, so his weight carry him down. I am rewarded by a zoom of his face howling on the pole and the noise of the blender tip going through his skull as he slips down to my feet and I wake up.

THE SHELLING PART 10

************

LIFT-OFF

You can't ignore the fact that extraterrestrials exist and may have visited our planet. You can't write about life, write about the universe and write about gods without exploring this possibility. So I'll do it, to finish this part in beauty, and to open the mind of this world which seems unable to imagine something cool that doesn't end-up fitting the ego-gods ideology. But I won't be too hard, I understand the importance of spirituality, as I understand the historical weight of religious indoctrination, often enforced with violence, and the extraordinary manipulation level involved in the stories.

But the result of too much PMBBD is that "good" judgment, particularly concerning people, becomes more limited, and it is in this reality, and it is a final affirmation I make; there is too much PMBBD (Propaganda, Manipulation, Bullshit, Brainwash, Disinformation) to the point that people leave most of their valuable judgment in the hands of manipulators. And the more we "evolve", the more the mind and judgment limitations gained through PMBBD is apparent, to me, surely not to those susceptible to it, but we're all interrelated and believing we're good with judgment and all, so I should close my mouth unless I end-up as the one without judgment.

If you ask me if I believe in god, I'll answer that yes I believe depending on the scenario. And, talking about judgment, I'll add that the strength of my belief in god is generally inversely proportional to the popularity of the form, or, if you prefer, the more a god vision got followers in this reality, the less credibility the story, generally, and it applies to people versus their "Super" "Stars" "gods" and divas too. The conflict with me is that profound, I'll laugh at your god religious vision, which got 0 credibility to me, something I can qualify as manipulation to encourage and defend evil, but then you'll laugh at me in turn when I'll talk about the life god as an extension of the UI, the entity I believe in the most, which is a view that haven't been invented yet (or publicized to my knowledge; I guess it's more important to bring to my knowledge books like Catholicism, Stephen King, or 30 Shades Of Grey, understandable, but why? They're popular? Or is it that they've been made popular? But worse is the truth, when you know how pressure selection works...) At least I know I can't trust popular judgment and its dependence to publicity to suggest which books I should read, and since politicians represent people, then I wouldn't leave my judgment in the hands of anybody in this reality, on any facet of my life, even if some positive result could be gotten, like living my life successfully in the definition of success of this reality...Did I already mention that I found no example to follow in this reality?

As I think of it, some scientific study proved people are happier when they don't think too much, like they found a human property; the truth is that you're not as motivated to happily jump on the bed when you know that under the bed cover is a mattress full of blood sucking insects and sex diseases, now would you grab the magnifying glasses for a closer look? All that to say that the study, again, as always when dealing with people, is wrong; people don't hate spending energy to jump on the bed, but they'll sure hate jumping in shit or playing in it. I could say that what we don't know don't hurt us (directly), but I would be spreading PMBBD since the truth is more complex than that, and such a way of seeing things is counter evolutionary in its most basic form to say the least; I have to look at the truth of the reality I live in if I'm to minimally evolve and get better judgment. Anyway, whatever the way you look at it, this proverb is stupid, and you don't make of an exception a general truth with some proverbial bullshit, because yes it is an exception, the truth is that what we don't know limit our options, like survival options. But yes, sometimes it is better to ignore some things, for some time. So it is kind of logical for a sane mind to depress when studying this reality, the more you study this reality seriously, the uglier your opinion, the more counterproductive complexity you'll dwell in, and the less hope you'll find. Do you like to burn your hand? I can bet most people don't like pain, well, what about psychological pain? This book (s) is a form of self torture, I'm proud of it but I hate it, my opinions never get better, all the subjects, principles and theories I explored get tainted by what I hate. Remember my inverted psy therapy? Yeah, at this point I can say I succeeded at making sense out of myself, thus failing my therapy, and it means that I'm ok in the head. I'm ok but I'm not happy, so it's not me that's my problem, something I can heal with a few pills and a psy, or destroy with a weapon, no, it is far worse, it is the whole reality that got a problem, and I can do nothing even if I have solutions, I can only smile a little ironically at my Cassandra syndrome since in the end there is no exit, it's like being dead and alive at the same time, it's like worthless valuable wisdom, I do it because I have to, responsibility oblige. One thing's for sure, knowing how condemned humanity is, then I'm not in a mood for fun, or I don't feel happy, and I think I'm normal for having such a reaction. So if looking at the truth of what the human made until now is depressive, then what's the big party all about?

When the mind of people will be too much of a mess of PMBBD, or when it will stagnate or degenerate, what will the science of the mind do? It will probably concentrate its energy on seeing sicknesses everywhere, they'll work on the result of failing to respect the human creation in the first place. As for me, maybe my sickness, apart the fact that I absolutely hate unnecessary hassles, is that I see living as not worth it if there is no meaning behind things, I'm ready to work and feel proud of it, but only if I know it mean something, or feel it is worth it toward life's advancement. But in this reality I feel like I would work to make more of a mess with life and things would not get better with my contribution. I would have worked and enjoyed it if I was born in a tribe of (sane) savages, my mind would have felt good, but not today, today I would feel a traitor to myself, I would grow a conflicting mind to justify, and I'd probably end-up depressive or with alzaimer. Laugh all you want, I'm sure my mind is healthier fighting this reality than encouraging it...

As for pain, there are many forms of it, it's painful for a "super" "star" to lose popularity, it's painful for a rich to end-up poor, and remember what I said previous chapter about pain and fear? They work hand in hand, but systematically use them to manipulate people and you condemned your civilization. In fact, growing a humanity in envy (jealousy), competition, fear, violence, pain, unfairness etc, is a guarantee of future failure. Could we have started differently? I believe so, we just needed to worship life with gods at their best possible place (not imposed, what we must battle is PMBBD having a bad effect on people, so a distributor of PMBBD like Catholicism must become an obscure epoch thing to study, it can exist, but it can't be defended by governments, can't get grants, can't publicize their view to the youth. You could say a bullshit book like mine should be burned fast, but there are a few principle to understand first; my book is an exploration, a story, and I came to conclusions, it is not an indoctrination, then there is the fact that I must fight a fantastic history of a bad PMBBD pile provided by the ego reality, and all the tools it used to become an invincible systematization are in my arsenal of fundamental rights, sorry cheater. Then I believe knowing a basis of philosophy and spirituality to be necessary in youth, but it must be made as an exploration, like a philosophy course, not as a brainwash where you learn things by heart or where you see publicity about it, and the other point is the effect, the goal, I don't think or believe PMBBD should be eliminated, I believe it must be limited to what got a positive effect and pub should be categorized, not imposed, you can have a show of people talking about books because people know what they'll be watching, and you can watch categories of publicity too. There will be temples in a life reality, as beautiful as churches I hope, but you won't be forced to them as a mass, you'll go there to relax in the most beautiful symbiotic life and sky environment made by the hand of man, no painting of struggles and suffering and pity (I can shed a tear for the beauty and the works, but the Jesus crucified? Doesn't get an emotion outta me, weird, am I a psychopath?). The only way to spread your message or ideology without restraints is to remove as much PMBBD as possible from it; a life ideology can become a manipulative mess too if you push it with PMBBD, that's why I made such a big emphasis all along my writings that I'm expressing possibilities, and since all these possibilities are interrelated and non conflicting in all their facets, then I can say I opened the possibilities of a new, universally interrelated argument set, or a new ideology since it is vastly conflicting with all what I witness in the reality I live in too. Anyway, working for life instead of ego-gods would have put the human in a far more malleable position; we are not robot machines with a program of emotions we can decorticate mathematically, something made in china and dropped on earth as an army of obedient slaves controlled with PMBBD, no, we are life creatures instead, grown, we are a continually created piece of art, we are genetically reactive to the environment, we are independent as much as social, we cry of pain and joy. In old times, the human was created by a superior being, by magic, or in a lab, whatever, they didn't think of the human as something that would mentally and physically morph with the reality, even today such a concept is in infancy, science still make affirmations about the human like it is something mechanical, they continually make affirmations that life or the human is like this and like that, or they act like it's something new and evolution is just the story, or trail we followed, but someone like me that is automatically assailed by all kind of imaginative possibilities, that continually think in function of the past and the future, I can only feel alien, and maybe that's why I can actually invent another (complete) fundamental ideology, an alien thing to this world, I'll even describe a credible reality (next chapter) with an alien monetary system, and an alien political system, maybe my mind is alien! I'm saying stupidities, but with time I gained the certitude that there is nothing wrong with me, or is there? Then tell me what's wrong with me, after reading all my work, evidently. And it may sound like I don't care, but this subject touches me each time I think of it; my mind doesn't connect normal with people, that's my problem, I do connect, like everybody I guess, I have no problem socializing with most people, I'll even enjoy it, but I always feel hypocrite and superficial versus the truth of me, and women like me too much causing all kind of problems, to the point that I'm passing my life alone...There are more reasons than that as to the why I fail to make a girlfriend, evidently, I talked about that somewhere along my writings, and I know the problem is me versus a reality inappropriate for my style to which I refuse adapting to. It is very hard to explain or justify my mind or ways of life within the current social time frame too, and my work is in part a kind of tool I gave myself to deal with the problem, so when I'll go back more social, I'll be able to discuss my views better without feeling I missed an important factor, and if someone want to deeply test his stuff against my argumentation, then I'll tell him to read my work before asking too many questions or entering in a serious debate since I talked something like 1 hour total in the past 10 years, my talking muscles are atrophied (kind of, I have a lion's voice, someone said, but lately it seems I can't talk much without making an effort to compensate for my tone). Another benefit of writing my mind is that if someone like how I see things, then I may hear about it, I will cherish such feedback, but never assume my attitude or reactions; you can be religious or gay or a superstar and if you're nice, I'll be nicer, but if you give me shit, I'll give you worse if I can, and never assume my marital status either; it would be a dream to fall in love with someone that read my work.

Now, if you read all my (chapters) books until now, then you got a good idea of how I see happiness (remember?), and a big part of it is proportional to the level of conflict in one's head. So, in an ego reality, because the under of things is ugly to look at, or depressive to think about, or the competition is impossible, then you are happier as an innocent (except for party), and someone like me got more difficulties. Another way of seeing it would be to say innocent gremlins are happy in hell; they travel light (mentally), go to the confessional for pardon from a boss, they got money for party (fun), minimal responsibility, they follow and please the leader. But a person like me will be at the bottom of the happiness ladder in such a reality, heavy luggage (mentally), no source of pardon except direct relation, inexhaustible responsibility, do everything yourself, and you're lucky if you got friends, love, affection, encouragements, and money for party, but none of this came my way... Still, I know I have everything to be happy, but I won't grace this reality with my nice capacities unless someone modifies the environment so I can feel happier, not on a quest to continually justify being a traitor to myself because my actions in reality are in conflict with what I want, or think, or believe. And don't say I ask too much, I ask the minimum of decency with my mind, and this reality can't provide it. And don't think I look depressive, I look normal, and don't think I act depressive, I act normal, in fact, it is my belief that the state of mind I sustained during all these years made me impervious to many mental pains, and I'm just on the verge of far better feelings...

Today, when I hear humanity, it means nothing good, a condemnation to unfairness, competition, war, PMBBD, the ego-gods ideology. It means I can't trust people, I must continually decorticate what I hear, close my heart to life, dump my good consciousness, tolerate, accept, pardon, "love" anything that I hate, and displace my hate at the wrong sources unless I end-up in prison, etc, etc, I'm better hiding all my life in a hole to stand for good... That's how it feels to be a human for me; let the time pass, enjoy the moment, work hard, don't question too much. But I'm sure being a high consciousness civilization means more than that, it's just me that is alien I guess, when I think we ought to do our best.

So I can do nothing but wait until the adapted selection changes or disappear, and since it seems it will fight to defend or tolerate this hell until resources are exhausted, I just don't understand why I persist on believing there is a potential, or a chance. Why don't I do like everybody? I know; I'm the inhuman one because I refused to bow, and I persist because I know potential is still there, most people really try to act good, and I can't discard that so I stand for this part. In fact, even though I attack all kind of attitudes and I hate this reality, my work proves I like life, the creation and the human more than most. I still have faith in people, I understand most problems are unconscious and caused by condemnations and wrong beliefs, but the more you work to make evil an acceptable thing, the more you sink yourself, and that's the problem of good, this whole reality stand on this fantastic failure that will forever worsen until the end.

An evil action is done, it is weighted in reality, why do we waste our good energy to make it good for counterbalance? A systematization of evil attitudes seen as good is an unconscious condemnation from conflict to serve evil whatever we think we're doing the best good action, while we are in a war with life and it will win one way or the other or we'll destroy ourselves.

We're building that hell with good intents, and that's what's breaking my heart, good intents all over the place but innocent or not caring of fundamental evil powers because of too much PMBBD. Nothing can be better than good intents, whatever the mistakes, but it's not enough, and innocence can't be an argument anymore, soon it will be 50/50 just on the good intent facet, not in actual weight of evil when thinking of all relations like encouraging or defending evil unconsciously, or working for evil people, or spreading evil PMBBD, soon half people won't even have good intents except as a façade, and there won't be potential anymore since evil already got a vast majority of the means.

Soon nobody will refuse a thousand bucks for sex since the majority will be members of the fun fuck-all fuck friend free for all libertine revolution while singing love. While the rest do as usual, in their ego innocence and unconscious encouragement of evil by accepting, tolerating, adapting, pardoning, ignoring, compassionating, and birthing as good givers of life to increase overpopulation condemnation and get their children to fit in, as best as they can, believe in a religion, be a member of all those new changes and revolutions to make the world always so much better while defending the Democracy-Capitalism business as the best and final system, whatever the conflict with unconscious deductions and life...

I'll have to make a more personal visit of the lot of powerful beings I never end hearing about and who cause so many problems in our lives. I already wrote about them a little so I condemned myself to it. I will make them somewhat of a spiritual extrapolation of the philosophy I'll try to apply as new systematization of reality.

Ego reality started with its vision of gods, something satisfying manipulators and people wishing to own or control unfair means. My visions of gods as powerful beings won't permit that, they follows logic, order, and principles imposed by a process that is beyond even them, yes. So I will try to make all the possible powerful entities I can think about part of the fundamental spirituality and philosophy structure upon which reposes and can be build a new reality, and the view will not be an evil control for ego pyramidal reality of de-responsibilisation and exponential injustice based on PMBBD, division and competition hype, it will be an associating one, related to life and the universe, possibilities, the necessity of good and love, and so much time and goals and steps that you'll start to cope with infinite life principles. They'll be more argument for the necessity and viability of the new reality too. I'll give them that value, even if for you it may not mean much, just some science fiction stuff, but for me it's far bigger than the start of religions. It's like my vision of another reality.

So for most it will probably be nothing since they'll compare it to the final result of their reality added to their PMBBD, but for me, it will be like hammering the final nail in the coffin of the ego-gods ideology, it's personal, you got your miracles, I got mine, and after that, I'll try to create the basis of the new reality. Like many vision of things I have, I'll prefer to give general directions rather than a final truth, so I'll expose a few scenarios, since I can easily live and believe in many spiritual scenarios, but none will fit the ego-gods ideology, sorry. That's why I'll add right away that there are a few possible view where gods as supreme entities could have made better sense than religious vision, life systems which may relate to the Mayan view is nice, god as the sun, since the sun is the giver of life, and since he gave birth to the planets, then you could say the main global god is the sun while gods are planets, this view was an excellent start, and it existed far before the coming of religions...The Indians too had the start of a good vision of a powerful entity, god is more related to earth life systems for them, nature, animals, the earth, the sun, that's cool too, more feeling related, probably the logical path to eventual pyramidal bloodbaths...Because, what's to stop some ego driven chief fucking the whole tribe of women to boast himself as powerful as a god, like a fucking giver of life? And indoctrinate populations that he really is? You got to debark with a missionary fast before that happens, and flabbergast them with daemons and angels and sacred virgins...So I won't be shy relating to such visions as I explore possibilities related to gods. Finally, when I want, I'll fit myself as its main character or successful experiment because I'm the inventor of all this stuff.

I'll jump right in the fire by starting with the craziest I can believe in, something a creator species could do, maybe gods. I'll say that I'm an ultimately optimized unconscious part missing many functions attached to a development formula, call that an unconscious package. I'm no bigger than a dust split in two, so thin and lost you cannot have consciousness of it. For eons I've been living in a simulated, earth like, and human like environment, in the "lab" of a creator, under the optimizing and concentrating pressure of a full blown powerful consciousness mind. But that's about to change as I will test my worth again by visiting again this world with a bad reputation, which call itself earth.

The world I'm from is what you'd call a paradise, I call it a world but, actually, it's more a spaceship than anything else. Some worlds know of us, others may suppose our existence and even understand it quite well, qualifying my place the home of the creators which is somewhat the case, but we see ourselves more like consciousness potential unlockers, accelerators, or catalysts. However we can accept to be called creators since we create the only thing, the most difficult one we ever met, that encompassed the whole ability of our civilization; we "rewire" unconsciousness to go past invincible conflicts, but we can do many more things. Furthermore, a creator is not a single being, it is a team, the creator is the one having the most totality of skills, the most global view, and he is often the oldest, even if we have a death rate about equivalent to any other high consciousness form. A creator is the one to carry the optimized consciousness "formulae" too.

Humanity is a rock on earth besides us, we don't even need suns anymore, but we are not gods, we just decided to take a space that needed to be taken. There are still many things we don't know and we are still very impressed by our ignorance when we witness over and again what life can do that we never thought possible. But we are "advanced" enough to work directly in harmony with life; we can even "machine" whole planets, and that's what gives us the power to create the right unconscious formulas and transports to affect the work of life.

The space we have taken is one of helper, we "nudge" life and stay hidden, and the resources we take are the most basic and worthless ones. We do extraordinary things from almost nothing, we have something like your philosopher stone, it is just far bigger and powerful than you can imagine, a facet of life we have become masters at using to our advantage, by understanding life and physical laws. We can do miracles with a shovelful of sand, resources are too precious for starting civilizations. If you ever meet us, keep your precious gold and diamonds, it is worthless junk under this form to us, what we like is creativity growth, history in truth, how you grow, and you're already providing a lot of it so we are the one to be forever be indebted to you, and in more facets than only this one, even if your "evil" people desecrate a lot of truth, but we witness the truth of it. Our fun is to watch life and help it by the most little intervention we can do that will give the greatest results.

Humanity on earth haven't understood much about creation yet, in part because they made of ego (profiting) their main cultural trait, that which is the unconscious way of beasts and insects, and lead to a hive or pyramidal unfair society of continual war and death, or the creation of a "hell" (failed) world with a vision of single specific powerful beings, from their unattainable or non-furfillable dreams of superiority or ego.

The side we help is conscious love that brings independence and individualism in association, fairness leading to survival and the creation of a "paradise" world with a vision of a more just distribution in quantity and power of ego, reaching in truth a greater quantity of actually and realistically more satisfied and willful people.

Those people on earth never had a chance to explore and expose their will for lack of an adequate reality, they hardly even doubt they can have a reality that would better suit them, and their lives is usually too much a fight just to survive long enough in their conflicting state to attain sufficient brainwash to finally bow to the reality. What's more, such people are an ever diminishing minority because of the pressure for profit which always lowers their chances for reproduction, and that makes the attractive couple in ideal love happiness, quite a rarity, and I'm not talking about your marriage thing. Yet, the ego step is important for all civilization, but it is meant to go over, one way or the other.

The brainwashed innocent hordes making the selection have been fed PMBBD from television and internet from birth, got a vision of gods as human superiors, their soul hidden under the cleanest façade of pseudo love while their vision of it create sexual, mental, and physical degeneration. Then there are the rare true lovers with their un-surfaced ideal hidden under a pile of profiting pressure, who must work hard to keep it in happiness, who never had a reality where they could thrive, who witnessed a history of unfairness and profiting from innocence desecrate every good word and principles to the point that such people are on a disappearing tangent, love has become a battle with reality as providing the gloves. The problem is an invincible systematization that even the powerful with good intents fail to make work in a good way. Unfair and profiting people systemized the means for themselves from the beginning and they want to do it to the end. That may be why the idea of socialism got so popular and strong; it stuck a sensitive cord associated with love, fairness, being a worthy human, but that word "socialism" is still a lapidation of its true meaning to this day.

We are amongst the most powerful beings in a position of creation; we devoted our existence to help life systems reach their goals. We do so because we know life is limited in its senses and can't deal with all random possibilities happening on a planet, even those resulting from its experiences; very rare are the life systems that succeed in their ideal, and the biggest project a life system may undertake is giving birth to a high consciousness specie.

But sometimes the line is very fine between success and failure, and that's where we intervene, we've seen life fail a few times and what we witnessed is very much akin to human feelings; life as a whole live emotions, and they are of an extraordinary magnitude; planets, whole solar systems, even galaxies can implode from life failures, but most just become zombies waiting and hoping to be conquered by a successful high consciousness from somewhere else; they want to hear history of success, the recipe of success, they want to know where they made a mistake, or if they were simply unlucky or did not have the means to reach such results, which is the case for most.

The most terrible horror is for a confident life system to pass very near success and then lose it all, sometimes the emotion is so strong that pain is transmitted to the whole universe, or the failure is so big that a whole galactic life system makes a show of destruction. The result of any such situation is always tremendously negative, destruction, extinctions, burning; innocent civilizations dies, innocent systems dies, billion years setbacks to all kind of life systems everywhere.

So here we are, we try to identify the best life systems in the galaxy, the most beautiful, the idealists, those that develop the most intelligence capabilities, and we keep an eye on them, we want them to reach their goals, so we wait for the expression of what they want, and then we help a little where they are too blind, and in case of failure, we can incapacitate their life systems if they get too emotive, because the failure is at the height of the bet, they can go to the extent of investing their own existence.

That never happened yet even if we witnessed many failures; we seem very appreciated, we're like a little independent external sense cheat that life is very happy to have, particularly since we intervene at the minimum scale, we don't want to cheat the capacities of life, we want it to wish for our help. You are the result of such a life system, maybe the most wonderful thing we have witnessed a life system giving birth to, but at the same time, you are at the emotive limit in many life facets, so we are ready for anything.

The human have been "accelerated" through a time window to become one of the newest of advanced, potentially high, consciousness life in the galaxy, since we still haven't visited another galaxy and we believe it may only be done through heavy association with other high consciousness life-forms. But we try and maybe someday we'll succeed with your help. Now, the rate of environmental changes we witnessed on the planets where civilization evolved doesn't permit the best form of consciousness to evolve but the contrary, the worst.

The "human kind" of consciousness need fantastic amount of time to develop and it is very hard to find the potential for because it exists within an environment that rarely lasts a million years. What we always witness are species that destroy the life bearing capacity of the planet, by creating hell in whatever way, before gaining the ability to stabilize it for themselves, minimally, or developing on other planets. They can't keep the planet or life friendly to themselves, they can't spread to other planets, and they leave a worthless planet, triple magisterial failure. We gained the experience of witnessing what kind ends-up in such a scenario and that's why we try to identify and give a little kick to those that may skip making these mistakes, even if our judgment failed us many times.

The bets, as always, are that the new species has the potential to reach other stars, and or make contact with the creators, but that is not necessary, as association always come as a conclusion from good species developing in a galaxy. And we help because, among other things, it's not worth it losing a worthy specie developing civilization if it can be helped unconsciously, without direct and traumatic intervention, which we learned long ago to limit to almost nothing.

If the specie can be helped away from some pitfalls, we do it until we see it's too late. Even if 99% of the help amounts to nothing, as a fatidic date gets nearer, the pressure to succeed increases and so is the worth of a successful positive change; it's just like lotto, and that's somewhat what it is, as the number of creators increases with population, risks, or needs.

In the galaxy, for the rare who see the light of the day, one starts as a neutral species which always go through some difficulties by its own experience before having a chance to revert to something better. Usually, the deeper the troubles they throw themselves in, the more potential they have at attaining a "paradise" situation if they revert to it, but the less chance they have to succeed. That is so because everything becomes interdependent, people can't move or change, and everything new is discarded, bypassed, laughed at, ignored or invalidated by expertise except the impossible to defuse bomb. If you prefer, the form and pressure of history genetically formed the civilization.

The better the spirituality and philosophy driving the people, the more we appreciate them and the more we may want to reveal ourselves if we happen to be passing by. But we don't if people are at risk of going crazy because of media hype, unless some very exceptional situations happens. Most species continue their downward curve in their own troubles until they lose their capacity to reach other stars, their consciousness never became strong enough, they took without thinking in advance to have fun and satisfy inadequate people until they lost the capacity to reach the stars. Still we don't compare them to animals since animals are part of a whole and when one becomes too powerful it end up dying by his own limitation but always leaving behind, a living planet for high consciousness.

Humans, like any potential high consciousness reaching species, are supposed to start in unfairness, violence, war, sickness and death. That is because high consciousness is grown in an animal overwhelmed world, or savage planet full of animals that unconsciously compete on ego drive at all cost to fill any space they can (the unconscious and automated way of living). One of the other factors is lack of satisfaction, or the system evolution that cannot satisfy most people until the civilization have cumulated enough work value, so you are almost forced to start in blatant unfairness enforced with violence or manipulation to have a start of a standard of living somewhere; it is better to have a few people living well and controlling at the whip an army of starving workers to provide their needs than to have savages or farmers (nothing wrong with farming) all over the place. A systematization is better than none, but the challenge is to strive for good; those who get the most means must be the best as a total human value, not only on a few facets. The goal is to forever get more fairness and less violence or manipulation, not more unfairness, more media manipulation, more police, army, weapons, war machines, the worst thing you can do is to systemize evil by making of unfairness an eternal thing through an ego competition to accept it, thus becoming evil as a specie. The limitation here is one of standard of living; once past the point where someone is living almost in luxury, it is evil to go beyond that if the means can be used to make others, who are worth it as a value of good, living comfortably. And that's only one facet of fairness, I could talk about the value of judgment; someday, when it becomes possible with spread reading and writing, you are supposed to develop the civilization from a direct input from each person concerned by a subject, and since you don't need to read and write to vote, representativeness can only be seen as a step to it, surely not a condemnation. As you can guess both of these fairness facets are stagnated thousands of years in the negative, they stop evolving toward good and became an invincible systematization.

Once you succeed at spreading good, and forming a sufficient structured civilization, your consciousness should wake you up one day as creatures of love and life that wage war to ego overwhelmed vampire creatures and unconscious monsters. But consciousness, particularly widespread independent one, is hard to wake up massively, and it is hard to predict well the tangent a civilization may take, in what order it will discover or do things, how it will use knowledge, its languages, etc. Humans quickly became hateful racist ego killers enslaving their women, a classic, but they developed all that in the most extreme fashion, building their whole reality, economy and philosophy around ego, violence, dependence, profiting and sex.

Your languages is not developing in the best fashion too, instead of developing them to encourage an ideal and truth, you are using them to form a wheel of self-encouragement of "evil" attitudes by not caring about the truth of words and principles, seeing it as a free competition thing where anybody can try to spread their twists, with some ridiculous limitation which can only revolt people against controlling the evil of it, like interdicting "dick" while everybody know what it means and it's just a word, nothing evil there; language good path is one of the hardest thing to gain back control of for a civilization.

Rare are the ones to get out of such a level of wrong vague, twisted and generalized associations, you talk too much for nothing that means nothing or anything, even if we never met a race with so many languages. You try to spread so much PMBBD you're developing your whole mind as a communication decoding and PMBBD making specialized device. The way you're going, one have to wonder if someday every words or sound will be associated to a standard variation of tone to change its meaning, you'll become poets or humorists, good at entertainment, your language an artist thing, a joke, a jester's language meant to entertain your "gods", or it will be like listening to opera in another language, but maybe I'm exaggerating a little.

Another byproduct of this is that you are terribly limited in developing your truths, you are disconnected from life path of evolution and the jesters will end-up looking like a frustrated chimpanzee on pill boosters and Viagra besides a well evolved high consciousness race. You're too full of PMBBD from your fun and hype media industry, be careful, someday it may become such a chore to decode what you truly mean that nobody else than yourselves will want to deal with you; not every species talk, hear or understand easily, the way you're going we won't know what word to use to communicate with you, how you'll understand, what your reaction will be, and that's without mentioning that many will simply refuse to learn your associations. We'll have to either communicate with you in machine language or define words continually to skip misinterpretations and we don't have much respect for that.

You lamentably failed at love, fairness, good, and life protecting and spreading, and we are not seeing clues to the globalization or systematization of these as self-consciousness, more like the contrary. Now, it's almost too late for that, your path seem inflexible, yet, there is still a bit of time for you, and turning an advanced "hell" (see "hell" as failing high consciousness) can happen and they results in the best "paradises". It seems the higher challenge and difficulty brings about the strongest, best and more stable philosophies that can modify reality.

If you wake up now and put the petal to the metal with love, fairness, good and life, you can end up not only in a paradise but as a heavy weight influencer of creation work. Now, the species is better be worth it because a creator takes lots of risk sending his unconscious in an advanced hell; we don't like to waste thousands of years getting our newly built stable unconscious back to our conscious standards when we come back...but lotto is lotto, luck and bets are part of everything.

To help, we try to simulate the specie, we indirectly spy its actions and reactions, recreate their environment, and we put our life to the task of living a simulation of the life creatures we "admire". A creator lifespan is longer than a human one because we have far more knowledge, time is a more variable thing for us, and we developed million years stable and not conflicting principles truths. We can live very long if we have the right attitude and are careful, but accidents always happen, one way or the other one day or the other. Death is different for us too, particularly since we've put everything into life.

This long lifespan permits us to optimize a consciousness part as a very concentrated and basic thing, we made a specialty of that since truth is our supreme tool; we have developed such levels of truth that we can almost touch the heart of life. That work is done on creation world, and then it is formulated as a transport and tested in a "hell", brought back, re-implemented, and studied for influences, displacements, directions, etc. It is compared to probabilities while the creator continues its "job" of "towing" the unconscious in a personally wanted direction while perfecting it, recreating a formula of placement and development of communication line for the unconscious. It is then packaged anew for reimplementation.

This is done at great cost and long years of efforts on the part of the creator, even if time is far more relative for us. This is a complex and long process, fitting with the natural way of life evolution. It is the least intrusive form of "steering" a species we found, we kind of give some people a different destiny they may or may not heed, since destiny have not much worth on your world; at 1 years old, most have already lost the best path for themselves, thanks to your media pressure and emphasizes.

Apart from that, a creator will be left tainted by his experience in his unconscious for a damn long time from testing his highly evolved consciousness in an almost doomed world. They end-up kind of condemned with the unconscious, but don't worry, not many complain of being admired for living two very different personalities...

That's part of the job of creators, and the risk is to strongly contribute to the downward spiral of a "hell" world. In such a case, you risk losing it all, the creator can be killed as a dangerous perversion. All what will be left of him is as a facet of the personality of the citizen of the planet he has been part of, and upon his death, only clues will remain from the photographed mind history, which is turned upside down inside out, filtered, statistified, classified, then stored under life process we don't witness. Yes we do that, solely for these species we work with, but it always stays a partial photography, we just preserve these, in case someday you may want them; it will be your choice to dump the lot or keep it, and it will change strictly nothing to our opinion of you, unless you want to become part of the creator specie, not just meet it, in which case, the base is open to any member, but for as long as it doesn't happen, our open data on you is limited to "surface" history, talking, writings and actions, and sorry to deceive you, but our activities require high moral standards and you are actually very far from that. As for the life "original", we don't and can't interact with it, we don't know what is after death.

In such a scenario, the creator will never return to continue building the unconsciousness he was proud enough to risk if he strongly contributed to a "hell", which is different than battling hell...; we don't like stupid mistakes, and these happen still too often. When we see an evident tangent that our actions affect a civilization worse than its own ways, we retire from intervention. A few drug lords or politicians or a sect is not enough though, and since after-effects of our presence may still be felt for a lot of time, we may leave a big gift in case the civilization is more independent or have more judgment than we think.

Nobody knows how or when he is to become a creator, it just happens by his sustained and stable actions over time, but being a creator is the trickiest endeavor a citizen of creation world can engage himself in. Citizens of creation world have a tendency to die by falling into traps or by being tricked, stupidity (as in not caring, not in the humoristic sense or candor) is almost a direct death and a death is a final thing, no continuation in nothing, except the natural reproduction channels, not even a process of matter rewriting of "good" or interesting bits of code or memories for potential attraction to positive fitting existing stuff, something like reincarnation...And we took that decision ourselves, because we live longer and our reproduction works flawlessly so we're not at a risk of disappearing, and we believe life systems do it for us even if life is still full of secrets to us.

There are fundamentally good guesses that can contribute to make a world better, they increase your worth as a creator, you obtain these by "visits" to others worlds, by implementing your "recipe" into a recent newborn there, that's how it's done. Logically, the chances of a successful visit and safer positive return are obtained from visits to paradises, and the trip is almost guaranteed to be a happy one, no creator is at risk of dying from incompetence in a paradise, but we don't like to help an already successful civilization, whatever the effect is insignificant since there are not 20 best paths, furthermore, you cannot implement yourself (your soul, your spirit) in a "paradise" as a global meaning unless it is turned back to a "hell', in which case it would mean the population have either rejected an old ideal, or forgotten it. But it doesn't matter, such moments stay (living in a paradise), in vast proportion, very good for the civilization there, and logically, this never happened on earth.

Scenarios of reverting back to a hellish situation happens very rarely, but then the successful implementer of drastic positive global changes is released from duty representing the race (that is a very privileged status full of advantages, more like a celebration that lasts as long as the civilization is happy) the world can then be implemented anew with the soul of another creator, but usually, a creator that successfully implement such changes keep his privilege status for a very long time, until he dies, particularly older than most, since the civilization stays a paradise.

It's like for Jesus, you'll remember him a long time, particularly since you've been indoctrinated by the institution that made him the Christ, in fact, his effect would qualify as a creator failure, but we wouldn't have killed the creator for such a failure since it is an institution that perverted, for profiting through indoctrination, all what he stood for. But you could say we have a kind of Jesus for every hell we successfully help turn around to a paradise. But it's not always the case, we intervene proportionally to troubles, and some become successful without our help, even if we may have a presence there. When we're fully involved, it's like a competition to see what form of our mind will win the heart of the race, but a big danger await, and that's the price to pay; you know on what reality you're dropped into, but you won't know once there, in an ego-gods ideology in full action, you could easily become a ego superior with a very negative effect on life...

Personal losses are obtained through a long string of personal mental misplacements without enough external connections to brain skills, that of which usually incapacitates the possessed being for the rest of his life. Personal losses usually create sick zombies who roam their world until they die not contributing to make it better. This is due to the inflexibility of the possessing unconscious to attach itself in any way to the reality they live in, the position is inadequate, or strongly conflicting, or it interacts badly, or it can't develop, or bad luck happens, anyway, the mind becomes unable to create anything else than very basic communication or interactions channels with the reality.

Personal losses are very rare, they create dysfunctional people. As it develops in a young mind, particularly one that is starting to develop consciousness, this can give very ugly results like the self-ablation of whole slabs of potential mind skills, the feeling of an intruding impostor or a violent possession conflict between two entities, or other such pitiful results. An unconscious that is judged as personal loss did not contribute the slightest in a positive way toward "paradise" in a reality and did not strongly contribute negatively toward "hell" either. Such results are obtained through the intellectual laziness of a creator, thus creating an inappropriate or incomplete "optimized unconscious influencer", or a bad implementation formula. Upon coming back, such creators lose their "jobs", and sometime their lives.

There are a few more ugly scenarios that could greatly influence the resulting reward or punition for a creator, among the worst is stealing the work of another creator, this is a very bad thing, because the unconscious formulae in such a situation would have been manipulated toward that end in advance, the same for assassinating another creator, or manipulating his situation. Then there are direct species interventions which can invalidate the work of a creator too, like assassinating the person before its time, or burning his work out of fear or jealousy, or manipulating him to inadequacy without good justifications, or disregard his logical rights to destroy him, things like that. The contrary can be true too, helping a creator is very well regarded. But we don't punish or reward people, we let life systems and gods take care of that, or the creator that has been cheated may get a revenge in certain situations, like if other entities took a liking of him.

The ideal of a creator is to globally implement his formulae to a high level "hell" world, being responsible for a turn around to "paradise". For such a situation to happen you have to live through the process of unconsciousness self-implementation by your work on creator world, then let other judge and watch the result in "hell". You need to put the basic ego game over in the world you're visiting and start your own that will make that civilization rise to a certain standard of basic "paradise".

That means the creator judged well the positioning, he "towed" the unconscious "formulae" in himself effectively becoming a perversion of a creator from the needed effort for the "towing", losing temporary its use as a creator becoming the creature itself in mind after many visits and hybridizing, becoming close enough to the truth of the race through the natural evolution of the recipient, one we initially calculated to have enough difficulties to prove that if something come out of it, it will be done mainly by self-motivation.

In fact, we give a load more of troubles to a being that is born to have a lot, that way his fundamental drive will be the base of judgment, if the being is good and strong of mind and body, it will show even after those difficulties; he can live with the creator work and worst, that's already good. As for the effect of the creator, it may simply never show, or it may give a better skill at something, it all depends on the reality and the recipient. But we know that hell causes or accepts mass death regularly, we know a good specie will fear evil and think about it, we know most of the conclusions it will come to, so if we "implanted" someone which would already be driven by good consciousness and will to help, that being may fall in a destiny line that somewhat works in harmony with the "implanted" destiny, and that may still be better if the whole specie needs or wants that destiny and is already thinking about these things. Thus the being may be born with a destiny that is in harmony with the implanted destiny which is in harmony with the present needs of the reality so he can have a possibility to win the heart of enough people to steer the world in a better direction. As to the why of all that, it is to permit the race to do its things free of us, we change almost nothing, anybody could do it...

The "possessed" being is heavily judged to determine the integrity of the formulae, what will be its effect on the person and the reality. In the best, and rarer, of scenario, it should be strong and true enough to help the person toward the true ideal of the race, replacing enough external brainwash by the vision of things within himself thus creating a severe rupture between the 3 normal roads of growth entities, (initial or chosen destiny, external brainwash, and own brainwash), and a fourth possessing one which is supposed to be strong enough to contribute to overwhelm, by seeking harmony, the 3 others to modify the reality to go toward his ideals.

In such a situation, the visit have become an efficient positioning and development of things, even if nothing is ever guaranteed as you can do things to perfection, and end up hit by a truck or cancer, the risks of the trade...Now you're probably gaining encouragement from the "initial unconscious", you're surely creating strong channel to and as consciousness, all the while keeping unconsciousness integrity without breaking the flexibility and skills of the mind, successfully transmitting the new consciousness formulae the person "mix" himself, to the citizens, who may decide it is good enough to start en masses the new consciousness to unconsciousness optimizing process.

It's like a virus, in your actual reality, this optimizing process reached stability "naturally" around 1000 but forever continued at a slower pace. That's how you initiate the turn to "paradise" and accelerate the transformation proportionally to the energy the civilization continue investing into consciousness until the momentum they got will bring them to the limits of the philosophy in reality. That is around present day in your reality (1800)). Then, as the turnaround is getting successful, the consciousness of the species slowly frees itself to other things and continue ameliorating.

Doing this terminates the wheel of unconscious home care for that creator entity, he becomes something like a soul for the collectivity of the "hell" he's turned around, and that applies to any human. He has won their heart, and as long as the civilization stays above the paradise "line" he shall not be removed; nobody becomes a god, but there are more worthy rewards than others...If he becomes the representative of a very high level paradise then who knows...Becoming the soul of a civilization is so hard to do that there are hundreds of creators at work on a single world at any single time trying to attain that goal, and there are millions of creators. As I write this, I would be in an unconscious race with other people around the world having similar ideas, and the ego pressure is terrible, watch-out for "gods" dreaming of becoming rich and served...

So we work our brains out, and with each tentative we think and become more and more like the creatures we try to help, trying to find the compromise that will bring them to find their equilibrium point and guaranteed survival. The basic winning philosophy is almost always the same but it's lost in such a vastness of details and complexities that it's a lost rock on earth. The worth of a successful visit grows with the difficulty of it, sometimes we fail, the species not made to develop high consciousness so it dies in its own "hell", or even go back and stabilize. Other times we succeed, and the specie suddenly start opening the horizons of all life related to it, becoming a developing force in the galaxy.

The chances for such an endeavor in a multi billions heads "hell" world to be successful are infinitively small. The number of factors that need to be consciously taken into truth consideration is simply too great, most often than not, the "possessing" entity destroys the subject and sometimes himself for lack of integrity or bad choice of subject, or becoming a "god" fast for profit. An initiator or a catalyst of true changes is still almost too much to wish for but possible in a not too advanced "hell".

But that's not all, through time we cumulated a few successful "races" able to be creators like us, but we are still in a position of superiority, we have trouble reaching consensus about if we discard that remnant of the ego-gods ideology, becoming one race among others, harmonizing with those we embarked. We believe we must do it since whatever manipulations we make, there is always luck. We existed in big part from it, others did too.

So we study how you'll do things on earth, and you'll contribute to that decision one way or the other because it is imperative we take that decision now, we are in a dangerous moment you and us. It is the end of our interactions with you because you're taking too long, you modified your environment dangerously, you're too many, and you're impossible to move anymore through indirect ways. Finally, the more "little" help we give, the higher the risk to make you related to us through reproduction where the "little" help may show some little differences in new offspring, and since you can't get rid of the ego-gods ideology, some become unfairly rich and your version of love gives them a reproduction advantage which, in the end, does the contrary of helping; we don't like family hegemonies. Furthermore, even if it happens extremely rarely, we don't like it because we have a tendency of seeing it as more direct intervention, but it's not a base for our judgment of the result gotten by the creator itself, which loses its privilege if he end-up acting like a superior unfair ego person.

Now, whatever we went through, we want to discard the last structuring of mentality that still make us a majority in our "civilization", so more and more creators among us are from other "races", and you "human" is the race that may end-up profiting the most from that or reaping the most troubles from it, it depend on your future attitude a lot, and you seem to have a magical gift to stir troubles around yourselves, you are becoming as much a source of admiration as a source of hate and division around here, too pretty and perfect for your own good some would say, that's why we consider we have done the maximum to help you and we cannot do it anymore, and anyway, in your situation, you are the species that cost us the most creators in our history by your inability to go past image and appreciate life better, and a creator is a damn costly thing, but we still hope you were worth it.

So we're studying the moves you'll make in front of your specific situation of systemized "hell" while spending a last effort of steering. We could do many drastic actions to help you but as I already said, we decided to never do that again except a bit at the beginning to help start the most likely specie on the consciousness path, and once you're finished, to trade with your world and system if the situation permits it.

Now you're asking what gives me the right to judge people like that and why my civilization has such powers. You seeing things from your historical brainwash of an inferiority complex imposed by religions. You think only your god can have extraordinary powers of creation and judgment, if it is not god then it cannot be! Your vision of god as a superior entity doing everything is wrong, and this ego pyramidal reality you've created is a throne for the many of those little ego dreamers, and it is a reflection of a sick ego, as much individually as racially. I can talk about the civilization I just described, while you need me to tell you who gods are. As for judgment, it is a fundamental skill everybody should use to the maximal extent possible, and what do you think? An alien civilization wouldn't judge you before interacting with you? It would do it far more extensively than I just did, and yes it would compare our attitudes to their definition of what is good or bad.

That being said, to go back to my story, we were amongst the first to escape dust to dust, we went through the worst the galaxy had to offer only to find ourselves alone for millions upon millions of years. We discovered everything in the wrong order, survived by luck and exception alone, and we had far less intellectual skill and prettiness than you. We developed a lot of technology before understanding the laws of the universe and the use of ego. War, hate, ugliness, ego, pyramidal planetary reality against hive planetary reality, robot war machines, genetic monsters, we did the worst possible crimes, the worst possible wrongs, until we started believing in other possibilities. War, violence and evil in reality, whatever the efforts some of us made at wanting it back, was insignificant besides the lasting time and good of true love, fairness, good etc. After successfully living like that many long years while succeeding at leaving our system, we declared it the winner. For a long time we've had harmony and thrived in it while we watched many other civilizations we spotted crumble and die by persevering with the kind of attitude we discarded.

After being alone for an "eternity", and finding the most fantastic solutions to civilization killing problems, we started helping potentially worthy species just enough to give them a better chance, easing their survival curve. After a few of them succeeded at thriving on other stars, we decided to become a secret kind of species, our involvement limited to helping through small initial modifications, and later through unconscious steering, rather than complete creation or brute intervention. We almost banished complete creation and direct interventions on life so much trouble we got from these.

The way we started was quite ugly, mentally, physically and realistically and that ugliness almost too often cost us survival, so one of the main feature we seek everywhere we see potential high consciousness is some prettiness which was the most fantastic hurdle we had to go over and the hardest lesson we had to learn to discover love and the possibility of living in peace and harmony, you just wouldn't believe what kind of ugly freaks we started as, you'd piss in your pants or kill us right away if we hadn't changed, I'm exaggerating a bit, but ugliness never brought us anything good, and the price we paid to change our appearance, the sacrifices we made for it, you wouldn't believe it. But we were eventually rewarded with peace, love, friends and the ability to look deep and far past facades, and this can make us less respectful of those species that got this advantage right away and still can't live in harmony, but still, we prefer to help natural beauties, it increase tremendously the speed and success rate.

We can eventually become detectable to species attaining our tech level, or we may squarely reveal ourselves to one that highly impressed or surprised us, even give gifts to some individuals, and maybe even reveal to those worth a good old extermination fun, depending on what kind of death they are worth. Unless these exceptions we don't make efforts toward that end, when we witness success we go away while leaving the possibility to be "seen" by that precise specie. Those we reveal to, or who reach us, will have the possibility to be a part of creator civilization. If they are too different, or inadaptable, they may never be met and we may stop all involvement, depending on how they evolve, to concentrate on other things, but we don't see that negatively; there are species who find greater pride in independence, or who work better in divisive and competitive environment, or who like to surprise big secrets entities and be rewarded with extraordinary benedictions, but we are traders too, you may meet us as such as you do your explorations of the vastness of space, because whatever the responsibility we have taken, we still haven't visited 0.1% of the galaxy. You can become your own creator species too, and we can decide to become simple traders...

For now, no species impressed us beyond understanding, and we prefer species that passed life's tests to be free of our knowledge for a long time too, but whatever you are incredibly different or not, we still believe there is a universal philosophy. All these are not final reasons why you wouldn't meet us, we are still changing, we may decide anything, and anything can happen.

So we try as long as we have the time and we see some potential. If we are satisfied, we may even profit from our time left to relax, we like to do that too. As of now, we don't have much of a good opinion of your style, even if you have a high opinion of yourselves and lots of entertainment; maybe you've been munching on that pride for too long a time, you can be proud of anything, negative or positive... A proud "hell" is ready to worsen as pride is closely associated to the exacerbation of the powerful ego; no competition is welcome, you cannot satisfy it, and you kill yourself trying; it is a force you must control if you are to survive, create, transmit and succeed at your life responsibility.

A creator species is a species that went through the worst the galaxy had to offer while, in the end and whatever they went through, not failing a single test and not depressing at its situation, and its ability to reach that much knowledge and technology is a proof of that. Once you reach this level you know you must not play superior, but that's not a reason to stay alone forever, so you help some worthy species survive more easily while you experiment a bit, but they still must go through the most important hurdles of the laws of matter and life. For their help to be effective, they'd need a way to observe, judge and interfere with us, they found a possibility, a reason, and place for that, and they used it, for as long as we don't take the place.

We'll never know for a fantastic amount of time what happens after our death, and when we'll be advanced enough to start experimenting it, they may have left us without help for a very long time, they may not be around. They help life but in the end they are, or act like they are, not superior. In a thousand newborn civilizations without help, they were the only one that had the luck to survive, and their first true trauma, as an adult civilization, was to see other civilizations behind them destroying their rare planets along with themselves. So, when they went through survival, loss of innocence and morphing of reality, their first dream may very well be to help life. Maybe when we'll meet a dead ex-civilized planet we'll understand the worth of doing things right.

You may say all this is an invention from my part and it is, but if you made a serious reading, you will come to the conclusion that this kind of "spirituality" I invented myself, if I may use the term, is a logical continuity of all my writing, and of my own brainwash, if you came to understand how I see the multiples facets of brainwash; everything have good uses, a best and better way of use, and place. The fact that I can invent a "spirituality" to go hand in hand with my thinking, particularly one that makes more sense that all the religions and sects ever to pollute this world, in my opinion, could be a kind of proof of the validity of the reality I wish to live in, and I'm not finished.

And I don't say creators absolutely exist without a doubt, I say they may be a possibility, something I can believe in. And I got many such possibilities, and they replace religions and sects for me, and they don't need to exist for me to feel well within myself. This kind of spirituality is all the good of it, I don't need to meet them to pursue their ideal, and I won't do the same thing those religious readers do, trying to make a paranoia over the morphing of words to reflect the transformation the reality made of those over time, twisting the meaning of everything in reality for PMBBD advantages; it is a basic path.

Now, if this creator species doesn't exist, what's to stop us from becoming something like it? Maybe the mind implementation part is a lot, but we could become that specie that travels the stars and help life, what's stopping us from having big ideals? For me, the greatest goals are the best. I don't know why it should be cool or good to dwell in mediocrity, that's depressing. How so? Well, at last for the first time, there is something that has a story as backup for its actions, the arguments to say we do and want to do good, they have ideals, goals, they move, they're in the action, and you don't have to meet them, you can idealize without evident logical troubles right at the start, science, psy, and knowledge institutions can scratch their head on new things they can't prove.

Next, why should I be an incarnation of a creator specie consciousness? You could say it is an ego displacement I perpetrated on myself and you'd be half in truth, but I'd prefer to say I fit the scenario a little since I don't feel treated humanely, and yes, in part because this reality revolts me. Or you could say I set my bar of morality too high, or maybe I have chosen an inflexible way of living, but I'm not inhuman and choosing to be treated as an animal is out of the question for me. Now, I don't look like an alien so what's left for me than to become superior and people become inferior to me? I could have become rich or powerful but I wouldn't accept to be treated as such in my mentality. What's more, I want to be myself, my experience of this reality, not parts taken from other people's experience of it. Finally, I can't seem to find a true problem in my mentality so I have the right to live and I don't want to do it under the rules of others no better than me but who think themselves so, all my life, and I'm worth a lot better than that.

This brings me to another aspect of my thinking which is the disconnection from such influences in the scenario where I come to fill certain criteria. Let's say that the level of one's rights and means should be proportional to one's level of consciousness. You could remove the principle for humanity if you want to see things as everybody with equal rights, but that's one utopist bullshit for this reality, and it would still reflect unfairness. Still, as I reached philosophical, spiritual and psychological independence, then I gained the right to any aspect of my person after I'm dead, and anybody going against my will will be committing a crime against me, and this applies to humans, extraterrestrials and creator species. When I die you kick my brain in the ocean ok? My whole body I mean, or you bury me without a cross and a priest, or you can make ground meat with it if you want, and feed some animals, but no chemical or preservatives or beauty cream of any kind. I still give the right to take a few spermatozoids around if you want to reproduce me normally, if they are still good, and a few stem cells here and there, not many, 2-3, or such an order of magnitude. And not for cloning, just for show, if you want to reproduce me you'll have to do it with unmodified sperm and nothing else. In the scenario where aspects of my person end-up in front of a creator species or extraterrestrials, then you have lost all rights over me as I write these lines, I'm seriously sorry, but that is unique to the state of my consciousness and the path to it. At the point where I am today, the only entity that has power over my dead self is the UI. All other entities must deal with me while I'm in full possession of my consciousness, whatever the way this consciousness takes form, and the integrity must be reflected by the complete edition of "A Flower To Life".

If we meet someone like this creator species, we associate, unless they're acting superior. Even if they don't have the history I gave them, or that they're not as good or boosted as I describe them, you don't play big torso with them, except for fun, neither slaves; you join, and learn if they want. If you provoke them, if you want competition or war with them, and you know some would be very happy to do it, then nothing human or earth will have ever existed; you disappear, you never existed, you are discarded, and you can throw stuff everywhere in the sky all you want, it will all be for nothing as they got billions of years of experience at it; they started in it. And a provocation against a civilization comes from the structure of reality, in ego reality, any yessir Arafat can do it as good and bad hardly exist, and division oblige. In another reality, it may be the people as a whole that provoke since there is no possibility for someone or a gang to compete and decide (with manipulations) at the place of people.

If we gain knowledge of them, and they prove they are who they are, then we can accept them as a part of humanity, they helped us, accelerated the chimpanzee through a very short window of time and possibilities, then they have the right to a 250km/2 enclaves, and this enclave will include other races that are part of them; just to see how racist they are, what games they play too, developing a "country" for their "culture". They can develop underground if they want, we won't bug them too much about what they do there except for inspection reasons.

And they're not a zoo, they develop their ways while still dependent from our reality ways. No nude extraterrestrials, and don't drop goo everywhere, don't scare or disgust people, get a face lift if you must and take your medication, if not we'll send you a human psy. Arrange things so people will like you, comport esti. And they must know how it works to travel to their places at relatively no cost to us, they cannot be abandoned on earth, but they can come to our planet and stroll everywhere they want.

But they know our ways and they must not intervene with us except to bring some minimal help, like some basic resources, or help in knowledge facets, like pointing fingers at costly mistakes we are making, but only as suggestion, we must never end up being jealous or hating them, so they must act accordingly, and we must accept their help globally, whatever the help is.

They must enjoy our planet and they must be worth it if they want to have a place, and that's all. There is no show-off or playing superior with us. If we have a safe future, whatever they helped us to it, then we are independent, there is no use helping us if we end-up as inferiors, death is better. So we do our things without being dependent from their help, and they get a job like everybody else. They don't develop their stuff to impress us, they adapt to our ways and technological level but they can add their touch, that's why I say they can help, like helping us work some parts of our technology. They act like they always did; they can accelerate some things if we want with minimal intervention.

As for us, no ego philosophy with them, they know the worth of things far more than anybody on earth, you will never exploit them like we do between ourselves in ego reality; they may never want to set foot in an ego reality anyway. They are positive to us, and we'll be absolutely happy about it, we can trade with them, but I don't believe the notion of trade as we see it is a good thing, anyway, they may need nothing else than enjoying our world, so trade will be like it is for everybody else, they'll buy things in stores.

If they don't understand the importance of independence, then we're better dying massacring them. That's the fundamental condition of creating a new reality too; to be rid of ego gods, we see life as a whole, we are one of its ultimate extrapolation, maybe the only one whatever I believe creators may exist, but still life, and they're a different extrapolation of life, whatever they've been through, and that's all.

If they behave and like our ways, we can give them more territories and eventually work with them as full blown free creativity equals (I'm not talking about earth and human stuff), developing great projects with them. And don't think you'll meet them, maybe, maybe not, maybe tomorrow, maybe in 10 000 years, maybe never. You act like they don't exist, point.

If they come, you have an idea how to act, and everybody that is part of a new reality will learn that this possibility exist in their youth. We'll be courteous with them, and we may even make a special day every year to tell them we appreciate their presence. What we don't want are people believing in all kind of religious and sect things who will run everywhere in panic grabbing at guns if they show themselves, or people wanting to have "love" with them like many movies encourage us to believe we should do, like the universe of extraterrestrials is waiting to fuck with us (as long as they're cute, like star trek for a start; we don't fuck with children because they're cute or fit your definition of sexy, as we don't fuck with animals, as we don't fuck with extraterrestrials, anything of this means you're a sick fuck, like the producers of star trek... Well, maybe I'm going too far, I understand you can be sexually attracted to humanoid forms, but it's very low as a denominator of mind capacities or sane comportment, and I guess such people wouldn't mind having sex with a kid too, if it was legal. What's the difference? I told you sexuality was not a pheromone or hormones out of control thing, it is a mind thing, so much in fact that you can brainwash people to a certain path of sexuality... But yes, there are people so twisted they'd like to have a cow the 4 legs open ready for fucking in their bed (if they could tolerate the continual munching and out of control shitting), and it is legal in this reality, acceptable, yes, I remember that story in the news about a girl that openly said she "loved" her dog and had regular sex with it, and because the dog liked it, it was seen as allright; sorry but that's lower than pedophilia to me, at least the one fucking with a kid got the mind abilities to differentiate a human form an animal...As for extraterrestrials, you got to take in consideration those people who see life as a never ending adventure of trying to prove something, a chain of new things and new partners, so you can bet they'll absolutely want to fuck with extraterrestrials, in the name of liberty, while saying they fell in love, or whatever, they'll use the love verb for sure. But yes, at the limit, I personally could have sex with a human painted green, but since my intelligence is more capable and complete and I control my ego, I still wouldn't, maybe in the dark as I wouldn't see what the fuck I'm fucking... (there is a religion that encouraged people to ignore one their most important sense like that, I guess for them it's better to fuck with an imaginary image, until someone flips the switch, then ho and behold; a cow!...I'm saying stupidities, but I remember another Greek gods story where a guy fucked all kind of animals (except the chimpanzee, to skip HIV, I wonder where we'd be today if people had caught HIV in antiquity...), and then he became a god when he started having sex with a young girl, bloody and painful style, good god... Maybe someday they'll make a movie out of that one too, since this reality never ends glorifying Greek gods and religious stories, but you can bet it will be embellished and made realist...). I could accept that people fuck with the alien, but solely in space or another planet, and upon coming to earth, they would need to take a shower and pass a serious medical to see if they are not at risk to others. You understand that the most precious place we'll have for a very long time is earth; at the limit you can make a mess of another planet, but keep the earth clean).

Back to my story, I could have kept it for myself, a part of my personal spirituality, but it completes the whole idea of the book. I had to incorporate it since it could be a start for more development too, for some people the source to gain more motivation, it increases our worth at the same time, something that makes us truly good with the proofs behind our affirmations.

When we find a crack through science and logic, making "good" stories from such possibilities is important, if you don't do it, some evil gang will profit from it to indoctrinate and exploit people. That's a reason why Jesus story was so good, since such spaces are always, evidently, exploited by unscrupulous people, but we must stop that.

That mean we must have possible stories that can fit all options, because these questions exist, sapping our energy seeking answers, always in conflict with something else. I aint got the pretension of making miracles, that's the track I'll use since it is evident for me it's a "good" track, but I believe science and spirituality must come together and be made a basis at school, there must be a place for the unexplainable, and it must explain how it can be a good place.

Now, the question is; if you started the world anew, would you prefer to develop, extrapolate and live in a creator species spiritual environment or an ego one? I will add another story that will seem to conflict the creator specie, but it could be easily harmonized to it, it's just that one or the other can work alone so no problem for me.

I'll base the next story on a mix of possibilities, a story that could fit old gods on earth; you can take or remove some facets if you want. To skip some quantity of interstellar travel, we will suppose they were born on earth and scrapped its potential to go somewhere else. That's very far-fetched, but with sufficient technology, maybe you can do such things as erase all traces of your existence on a planet, but that would imply that they were evil and did it as redemption for their sins. If we exploited everything, killed all life including ourselves and waited many millions years, the planet would be thriving with new life and some new resources from cataclysmic activity; that's the basis.

I don't believe much in that possibility, but only crazy possibilities exist to explain gods from antiquity, probably they are all an invention to manipulate people through indoctrination, but still, the story is interesting to extrapolate, however far-fetched. Let's see if I can make another different spiritual view of gods that would fit my philosophy.

We'll suppose some aliens are the first advanced civilization growing on sram, a planet at maximal resources capacity permitting them to make war and stupidities for a long time while still having tons of resources to exploit, twice more than we actually have. At the eight of their ego civilization, they succeed at building an interstellar vessel to their ideal, but its functioning is dependent from a superior hierarchy possessing the means to always keep it functioning as it is. They leave but they know that the ways of things they left behind will finish-off life and resources on the planet, and since they're in a super ego reality, only selected people can leave, those that had tons of money, the means, embarked discriminatorily by finding all kind of PMBBD arguments; they put "their" money to build the vessel or they had enough to pay the trip, but we'll say they added some "lower class" for good measure.

Now, to add troubles to the story, what if the type of communication available to life is limited? While there are aspects of communication that work effortlessly, concerning the UI connection mainly, it may be possible that even quantum communication becomes too power hungry over billions of kilometers, even if it goes beyond light speed. To cover such distances within our universe under a form useful to us, we may not only need tremendous power, but we may need a successful technological civilization on the other planet. Worse; following my view that a whole solar system can be seen as a system testing intelligence, it could even be possible that the system scramble communications past its boundaries, it could as much stop ingoing as outgoing, maybe even decide if we are ready for it, at which point we find-out there is a way for communication to work, act stupid and be forever limited and disadvantaged even if you successfully leave your system.

So they eventually find a way to reproduce on some other planet, always with the same control for ego reality, as a hierarchy of superior people dictating the development of the new planet. Then, for whatever reason, they decide to go back home earth, maybe just to make a visit, maybe because communication doesn't work as planned, maybe to escape a new hellish situation they created on their new planet. They'd come back as superior, maybe for a pit stop of water, dreaming they'll be welcomed like gods and be given all they want.

Sram, with its civilization without resources they had left behind would have passed their millions of years without news, not wanting to believe in the failure of the trip, they religiously believed in gods which would come back with loads of stuff to save them from their situation since they used any new resources that appeared to survive while things degraded to the point that technology became very limited from lack of some resources. Anyway, the voyagers have become gods that will someday come back to save them.

But both civilization have become unrecognizable to each other, one have survived on sram stagnating or even tremendously regressing from lacks, and the other developed in all kind of ways beyond imagination. Now, not only those idealized gods don't bring a single thing from their extraordinary civilization, but they ask for tons of stuff, even asking for it like gods talking to an inferior dirty population, with menaces and all. Add that to the fact that they became very different and their coming may have been traumatic. For the earth people, everything is different than what they dreamed about, saviors replaced by manipulators and exploiter, and they come to the conclusion that they won't help but only worsen things, then leaders and people invalidate the visitors as sham, alien impostors.

As for their ancestors, what would be the use of visiting a planet they're strongly attached to if they only find enemies or retarded savages there? To them the whole planet is a waste since the civilization on it will not permit new resources to cumulate, and the travelers still see themselves as superior. So maybe they would kill all this retarded ancestry that think they have rights, take what they want, plow the place enough to dust it all over and get basic resources and fuel from earth that changed while they were away because life systems were developing it for another chance. In the end, whatever they did, their ancestry on sram disappeared, or their interaction with life may not have been accepted by life systems, or worse, there was nobody when they came back in the first place as a meteor plowed through while the people hadn't the necessary resources to stop it anymore.

To continue on that same vein, for whatever reason, they may have decided to use the earth as a test ground for a new philosophy of life that arose through whatever revolt, and from their traumatic experience at colonizing. They may hardly have found an adequate planet, their window of survival there impossibly harsh and limited in time. Maybe the limitation they created themselves on earth before leaving limited their window of survival tremendously too. Add that to a controlled environment in a vessel that lasted 10 000 years and they may have become very fragile things without brawn to help them.

They may have become environmental freaks, hardly able to survive on any planet without vast domes or tunnels. Maybe sram was the ideal, another planet would not be as perfect, or maybe the environment they developed from, on sram, was not the same as earth; they breathe sulfurous nitrites and need acid rain or something like that. Whatever, their environmental conditions of wellbeing may have become be very temporary or fantastically difficult to get on a planet.

That's just an option, but they may have ended-up more comfortable and safe in an interstellar vessel because they failed to learn how to control their environment well enough before leaving sram, making a pressure selection based on their ego reality, working well in their "acclimatized" environment with scientists saying they are like this and like that and they built a vessel to transport the selection that most reflect what they're supposed to be, completely missing important life facets or notions.

They've ended-up as a science experiment, everything decided by scientists with a strong hierarchy of superiority to run the vessel, almost a military endeavor. They landed on another planet with just enough time to exploit and repair, or build another vessel, having learned some bad experiences from their voyage. No time to do anything else than being under strict hierarchy as the environment is becoming hostile to them, so they quickly board their new vessel and leave. At that point they are a vessel civilization because they are passing most of their evolution time in one.

They are now in big troubles, and I can add a lot more with luck and the initial unconscious (life systems) connection. What if life systems don't "like" them because of historical accumulations of unacceptable "bugging" of the laws of life they did on sram? Remember how I see circulation of information (in the "Life Infinite" chapter (book)? It's hard to tell at which point a planetary civilization is not worth living anymore, there are many factors, not only good and evil. Still, there's a lot we can do that doesn't please life, and as I already explained, we may already be living on borrowed time, just cumulating knowledge as senses. So what if life systems reverted against them with time, gave them a maximum of troubles instead of helping? So in that scenario they'd leave sram as a last tentative at survival, the civilization on sram would be dying from all kind of problems, like sicknesses and environmental instabilities. They could even listen to their scientists and "clean" or "perfect" some of their DNA, they could even decide to make clones from superior rich people. Escaping may have stopped many sicknesses, for some, but not life pressures against their inadequacy. Furthermore, for an added problem, we'll say their direct intervention and wrong reproduction would put their luck on the neutral line. Condemned to a few forms whatever they still reproduce between themselves, or condemned to boringness, or condemned to their knowledge.

So they go to a new planet and everything turns bad around them as they carry their life connection (history, initial unconscious, genetics) which always know who you are, or if you prefer, life systems (they are as different as there are different solar systems in the universe) there reject them even if they find their ideal window of survival on the new planet; things go wrong and they make scrap wherever they go. So they go back to their self-made vessels with domesticated animals, since wild life doesn't thrive well in an enclosed "small" vessel. (You wouldn't tell them accident always happens, I hope they made of that one their most fundamental philosophy! But anyway, that's only the scenario for life, if there's none in their vessel, which is separated by emptiness, they would have no problem there).

Someday it becomes apparent that they're missing something their scientists cannot see, what happens to them is impossible, it defies all probabilities, and there, inside that vessel, after losing hope of walking in a wild land ever again, they wake-up to life. Many scientists, leaders and religious people get "hanged" as a spiritual-philosophical conflict of unbelievable proportions arise, wars, mutinies and revolutions in the can until only the necessity of survival is left.

But they could end up believing they're punished by god too, and come back to sram completely nuts, maybe helping specie they exploited in old times as redemption tentative and imposing them their reinforced ego-gods ideology, if you want to worsen things still more...But they may have deducted that their problem came from their ego-gods ideology instead, from their lack of appreciation of life, then associated their lack of luck as a punition from life. They may even have calculated that their sins would destroy them, as they developed tremendous death troubles and before dying, they tried to save their lives by helping life to the earth and dumped their superior attitude by helping a different species gain their abilities.

That is to say they could have become a species that can only live in enclosed structures with a controlled environment, a jealous species with a broken heart from watching millions years old movies of their life on sram. As I write this, they may still be in a philosophical clash, even wars, with the human at the center of things, all the bets on us, the ego-gods ideology versus the life-gods ideology. One ideology saying it is ego competition that ultimately decides, the other one says it is life systems or a universal intelligence that decides in the end, and we could be the test.

But the life-gods ideology would probably win before the experiment is done, particularly if they have met other allied races that did simple things they couldn't do themselves, things developed by a different attitude through millions of years from stable non-conflicting truth, like I already explained with my truth theory in the "The Seat Of My Mind" chapter (book), anything related to attitudes, like fairness, or a different view of good and evil, who knows. But maybe not, they may still be alone, or with friends in not much of a better situation than them and everybody wants to see what will come out of our current existence; maybe nobody ever tried to prove such a thing as a mother planet. But I'm just extrapolating a little, maybe there is no experiment at all, anyway, at this point, whatever that's how it happened, or if it happened at all, we'll say they are still attached to solar life and want to test a mother planet philosophy and spirituality.

To test their new philosophy, instead of dropping some of themselves on earth and again come back to nothing, they accelerated a local species grown from the earth to make of the earth its birth ground, trying to copy what happened to them from the beginning.

After that, they stop their heavy manipulations to let the earth prove it can produce and sustain extraordinary life very different than anything they knew of. Instead of seeing things as a matter of competition for superiority, they would prove any "adequate" specie could be an equal, success would make them abandon their hegemony over the solar system, seeing it as a birthing place, not as something they possess and control. They would limit their intervention to give the new species somewhat the same chances they had. So they they help it away from costly pitfalls, help the earth develop an independent specie that will have the possibility to do anything it wants while knowing limitations, like themselves did at some point.

They try to put the emphasis of their encouragements on more consciousness, ideals, or morale. If we succeed, we'll be a proof that the earth is truly a mother earth that can give birth to a different kind of high consciousness offspring, and not only that, we'll be the proof of the invalidity of all the remaining superiority notions they could still have left. They may have helped us but we made as much as them with far less resources.

That's probably the limit of their intervention; bringing us to the same point they were when they succeeded at colonizing another planet and that's the test, prove that we can "wake-up" before it's too late to colonize another planet. But we don't need to prove it, we only need to prove we're doing it. After that, they won't be able to say they were the first or that they are superior or gods since we are another species that have been as successful as them, born from the same kind of planet.

Evidently, there may be big variables to the story, for one, they may have left sram with the earth as a planet under development from life systems, meaning, if they didn't believe in life systems, then they may have left while the earth was a planet hostile to life, like Venus, then they come back and they see the earth and the sight flabbergast them and there they start believing someone messed with the solar system while they were away. Added to that is the reason why I called their home planet sram instead of mars, because they may have come from another planet than mars, maybe a bigger planet, maybe a moon, maybe mars. Their planet may even have been collided or banished if life systems didn't like them or decided they were ready for planetary star travel...Imagine the trauma if they didn't believe in life systems, as the orbit of their planet starts to change, or a moon disengage from somewhere else to come right for them...Many scenarios can be made from all that, but one thing's for sure, me, I wouldn't insult a solar system, and that can take the form of being a life disrespectful civilization.

Now, still in this scenario, it is our choice to fail and disappear, or do the same thing they did; tough an ego reality, permitting possessors and manipulators to leave and reproduce while leaving behind a condemned humanity, or we become the successful and a part of something. We can even continue beyond their present philosophy, showing how sensible we can be, maybe causing them a far bigger surprise by successfully taking the lead by ourselves, doing thing very differently, but still succeeding at colonizing another planet. Doing the thing they failed at doing in the first place and maybe never thought they had to do; find a way to deal with time, resources, high consciousness, difference, life, gods, love, and a thing like the earth. We would not only banish the ego competition thing stuff, which they may still be waiting to do, in this scenario, but we would impress them by finding harmony and equilibrium on earth "forever", while not affecting its life morphing and developing capacity. We'd be safe here, developing the solar system as a trampoline for life.

We'd win the earth with us on it, becoming a whole in relation with it, doing things under control for as long as the sun works. They won't be able to take that away from us as they would have to endorse again the ego-gods ideal. Their path is one, our path is different; inside a few thousand years we dumped the superiority ego competition marmalade, while they may still be in it after millions of years. We do things in the order of life, not only taking the lead philosophically, but actually living it right down to earth, something they will probably never experience.

We'll be life things, beautiful planet things, we won't only be able to live in a vessel or a planet, we'll be "universal" and we'll control the environment of our planets because we learned to do it before traveling. And when we'll start traveling, it will be because we built the solar system to be a base, we'll only be one ship in many to come, and we'll send gifts to "enrich" the solar system and mother earth when we can. We have the right to do what we want if life systems "like" it; that will be our philosophy, we can stay on earth as long as it exist if life thrives with us.

After arranging things, we'll help life in sense; we understand how life seeks to develop independent species and if one attains high consciousness by itself on earth, we won't compete it to elimination like we're so fond of doing in the ego reality; we'll help it and preserve it in controlled areas for eventual more global development, either on earth if the dependent specie to it (us) wants it, if not they'll stay under control until we find an adequate planet for them where they can experience life their own ways. That is in the far future and such a possibility may not happen more than once or twice on a planet with an adapted species to it (environmentally dependent), so I'm just inventing things, as always.

All that is just a vague and improbable story, but in the domain of what's possible from billions of years ago to the future, you're guaranteed to have surprises at the level of your limitations of knowledge, so here I am, I'm trying to prevent you from being hit to death by a surprise. Furthermore, when I explore such possibilities, I end up proving that there is a path through all this that is always guaranteed to be the right one for all the most improbable situations. And that's what I've been doing with the book, forcing me to find the path that can be in harmony with how I am. For me, that's an extraordinary quest, difficult, and I'm far from finished, but things are taking form, even if I already had a vague view.

The earth will be our ultimate thing, we'll make everything in function of it, we won't consider it as a ball of matter we can leave behind, but as a precious life giver. If the earth was a nugget of gold, for ego people, you'd build the solar system around it, yet, it have a million time that value, you can't leave that behind or scrap it, that's a mistake you cannot do, unless you like eternal sufferings; you protect it like a maniac you build everything around it. We are in one extraordinary and privileged position to be in the thick of the action, participate, appreciate, help, but the position not to take is to act like we are superior to life, like we made it, like we possess the earth, like we have the right to destroy it in our competitive and entertaining power-trip.

And it changes nothing if I'm mistaken in some parts of the life philosophy and spirituality, it is not a justification to discard all my view, what counts is the end result. You don't make a paranoia about it but you're careful with life (including people, all what's related to life, everything), if you're not it means you need a stronger ideal, a better philosophy or spirituality. Nothing I write about is an absolute guarantee, but I'm open to all possibilities that can make sense within my vision of life, matter and the universe.

So, for our "unlucky" friends, you understand that they don't need to exist; I used them to always come the same conclusion. And I can use them to go farther than that, since their goal would be to prove that the earth can give birth to another high consciousness species that can reach other stars, the joke here is that it didn't include that the species would develop the life ideology before leaving, thus becoming the species that is the most associated to the solar system, so if they had a suite of projects for the planet, they all end if we expose our will for the new ideology.

If they want to play gods, they'll have to find another place, but they'll have to be careful; they may become an enemy of a species that give more value to life like us. We invented ourselves a vision of life and if it is in harmony with life systems, then they'll have to accept it too, they had their chance, now it's our turn.

If such a species ruined a planet in its past, then they shouldn't get frustrated or jealous of our success, while giving us the means to reach our dreams if they took those means, we're not supposed to pay for them or being condemned from limitations they imposed. Nobody should take the means we are supposed to have now that we exist.

These kind of stories are unconscious things in my mind, they drive me to be a better person, to reach an ideal, they give me justifications not to do some actions. And the difference between an ideal and a religion is that the ideal is an open thing and the religion is a closed thing. If you take the ego-gods ideology, it is open to all kind of religions, religions are under products variants, even Darwin and Einstein are not far from being religions, they defend the ego-gods ideal for the most skeptical, and people embark because they wear the sticker of bearers of truth, but even if their level of truth is far greater, they contain fundamental lies too, and yes they are lies because they are spread like final truths explaining everything while they don't explain everything. Darwin is given far too much credits for a very limited view of life that has been made all there is to it. As for Einstein, he made a theory that is supposed to explain the whole universe, even everything, while it doesn't even explain the ridiculously evident spinning of everything in the first place. So to me, scientists making those theories big and final are doing exactly what Catholicism of old did; fight as long and as hard as possible, whatever the means, to prove the earth is flat (a limited vision of things). But I won't compare them too much to religions since they are a thousand times better in their attitude with truth. The same for me, you could make 2-3 religions from the life ideal, and a few scientific religions too, but no need to because I exposed most possibilities, I'm not scared to show it right from the start because I know I have the right attitude, and it is good because it is based on possibilities, not lies and final truths, so people can be associated, not divided among competing religions.

This reality fears truth, protects its citizens from it, ostracize free minds like mine, it hides behind tons of PMBBD in languages, and religions, and final truth, there's one for anybody, all competing and conflicting against each other, twisting everything good to satisfy anybody, chose a package and hang on to it superficial people! But they are all facets or full of lies and people end-up divided in competing gangs. Another thing to be understood here is the view; my view is global, it is "the" spirituality I'm making and there can be only one such thing covering all options, even if it's just a start. Religions profit from facets of spirituality to indoctrinate people to a final view instead of one made of possibilities.

If we, humans, take the step of life and succeed, then whoever is watching us from high height will have to drop the ego competition and superior attitude to deal with us, and their actions will have to show that they somewhat endorse our ideal, the attitudes we strive to encourage. If they want to work with us, then they'll have to accept our vision and take the attitude, then we can make projects, but we will never bow to a species acting like superior people, they will be our enemies.

And don't think they'll bring bad luck if they were evil, luck is their personal problem, it has nothing to do with us. As for the connection to life, that's species dependent and it is reversible by a sustained change of attitude, even if that can take a very long time. We are two high consciousness species, we are trusted by mother earth, we have consciousness of them, so if we take that responsibility of giving them some space, then life will tolerate them if they behave and accept our ways and the ways of life, and with time they will gain "respect" from life proportional to their efforts. As for their civilization, they will be able to interact if they adopt the attitude, they can help the earth that way, in luck theory, but all those with whom they are in contact with will have to adopt it too, it's hard to be good if you help bad people...

And if mother earth was their mother too, they can intervene again if their actions help. If they got an attachment to the earth, they'll be like an old brother that went wide and came back bizarre, but mother always likes one better, particularly if you left her by stealing all her valuables or causing father's death, yet, she'll be happy to hear from you, she'll even make a place for you, but don't be a traitor. The more you help the brother the more the mother will accept your help, the more you behave "naturally" the more the mother will like you and the less suspicious she'll become, something like that. I write about them like that in this scenario because they could be learning from us more than we think.

We understand that the earth is a precious giver of life, any life, as powerful as us, and we proved our attachment to it before looking at other planets. Before giving birth, in a true love scenario, you must prove your attachment, and that works for birthing another reality too. You didn't try the new reality stuff? That's big man, and you can participate, yes you can, go ahead, I need some worthy help with all of this, I'm turning everything upside down and I'm alone here, I can ask for any help I want, unless you're gods; do you see yourselves as superior? No? Then help us, and if we are an experiment, then you have no use for it anymore with this, you'll let worthy people sacrifice for it? Ah! Humanity is a whole and it's not worth it for a few in 10 billions? You think humanity as it is is worthless to carry such an ideal? They're all interdependently self-condemned and dwelling in too much evil and can't make good except for patching their "loved" reality? What can I say then? They will again give birth to revolted people like me, under all kind of forms, again, and again, until the end, while never truly fighting evil, and I can't accept that. Raze them all? Destroy this history? But another ideal existed, someone gave a worthy fight for it, what will you make of that? You got to give it a chance no? You can make of the earth a place to give it a chance, remove the ego-gods ideology obstacle if it is destroying mother earth capacities. Do you believe the ideal is somewhat right? Do you believe a new reality can carry it? Do you think it is feasible? It is dysfunctional in my description of it but it could be made functional? What are your powers? Can you zap evil people out of existence? Help, whatever the scenario you are in.

What? I can't write like that? I don't have the right to be a little presumptuous? You think I'll let ego people decide everything? You know what future I believe this reality will lead to, so if you think I'll skip any possibility to replace it, you are wrong, I'll ask help to anybody I can. It is possible that some of my views are wrong, but I believe that anybody that is part of life must make it its responsibility to help and care for it, and here, care passes by giving life its tools back, us, and that means we need a new reality that will contain the new ideology. I just hope our existence is not dependent on fighting evil; we're kind of very incompetent at that...

Evidently you can discard or modify any part of my scenario, and you can mix in the creator species scenario if you want too, then make a super movie. I could morph both into one, but I'm not stuck to a single "religious" possibility, both options are open and they can be somewhat different, one or the other still satisfy my ideals and wishes, so I accept both can exist, and I'll add more gods scenarios that you can mix in too, even a few of them could exist.

All that come to the same conclusions as to how we should act, and people who want to see these views as argument can, that's one way I see them, but they are more like possibilities I explore to permit me to see what a global attitude may lead to, that's a "romantic" way to predict the future or guess the past, my views of matter, life, humans, gods etc, they reinforce my direction, they tell me if my view of good and bad is right enough (unless you don't want these notions to exist...), some things I should do or not do, where to go, where not to go, they tell me I'm right to go my way, to believe in myself. I can believe in such possibilities, and I don't need to make a competition to prove one or the other.

The same with love, I extrapolated it to all kind of conclusions, some may be wrong, to find what is true love under the pile of PMBBD. I exposed my ideal of it, even though I know it is totally utopist, but I want the biggest true love base possible so I fight for the ideal. But everybody know that the rip with reality is too large, you think people will suddenly stop dressing with "I love Montreal" t-shirts? Or destroy "I love M.C. Donald" pubs everywhere? Or stop loving their children? Or stop falling in manipulation love after fucking around like cows? Probably nothing will change, I just hope my "bad trip" about it will grow more true love. It's like saying you shall never lie, you know you can't do it, but you understand that the less lies the better, so you're as well saying "thou shalt never lie" (wasn't it god that said that? And religions used it to make the biggest lies of humanity and history, you shall never kill maybe?).

The same with life, I know all my ways of seeing it are not perfect, I know that I kicked Darwin and Einstein a little, but there are possibilities there that all point at the same direction. I like it to have the UI, gods and life as a whole to decide, control and judge things, you can find all kind of moral laws and directions that make sense there, I prefer to invent a way to give life all kinds of powers because I prefer to be judged in truth, than to be judged by the laws of an unfair system, and I'm very very very polite. I passed my life being judged by all kind of people who took a superior attitude, a lot religious, and I only cumulated frustration and a stronger desire for retribution as I busted my head to understand their twisted view of good and evil. It's a fucking shame for humanity that I'm left only with afterdeath to argue against their incompetent decisions.

Concerning religious gods, they're an invention meant to control (pacify), and exploit people and life, so I put them at their appropriate spiritual place in my mind; for me, ego gods are not good people, and this attitude on high consciousness beings is the most destructive, so I associated it at its proper place, a place that destroys, a place that doesn't care, a process that always ends-up as dust; the universe of matter without life, entropy.

Entropy is a process that decompose matter to dust, but life have to do with what it has; matter, and what it is imposed; laws, to fight against it and survive. Why? To separate, to test, to select. Now, what's the use of making a species like us if it can't understand life or its goals? What's the use of making a species that reduces life value instead of growing it, a species that seek dust to dust instead of skipping it?

Now, don't come at me shouting that I don't know what I'm talking about or that it doesn't fit, I know, I can set the limits that will make it fit if I want. As for the ego-gods ideology, I just took the attitudes in this reality that are related to god, ego or skills, competition, superior people, manipulators, profiteers, often living in senseless luxury, in the admiration and kneeling of their exploited people, pressure selection, systemized unfairness, an association profiting ego people with a superior skill. One thing's for sure, all these entities I can believe in would not like it at all to have their name associated with these attitudes.1/4

As for the universe itself, I see it as a creation of the supreme entity, the UI, and life, through life systems, is its developing intelligence, an emotional one, because what's greater than that? Everything is a process and any scenarios concerning the universe must include life systemizing itself from matter. If you took all the experience of life and made a functional mind with it, how big would it be? Who say your experience is lost? What's stopping information to decide things by itself if it has the means as intrinsic functions? Even stashing sensible memories in safe places? Apart from being my personal spirituality, all I wrote point very well to my ideals, everything makes me work against human "gods" unless they change attitude. Everything is built from a basic philosophy, and being vastly unfair to others because you got a better skill make you evil, it immediately imposes injustice, and you can grow this injustice for millions of years until we can't exist without it, but it will always come back to kick you as hard as the injustice, be it the unjust person or the one accepting it...too into the collateral.

The more I advance the harder to find or see ego gods and the bigger life becomes. But I'll have to add some more possible explanations to all that ego-gods "ideology". Our view led to the pyramidal "philosophy", and competition of everything through whatever means for profiting, and it closes the door to life spirituality because it is divided to facets thrown about with country competition and twisted to profit this gang or that. So, one facet is the superiority-inferiority competition of decomposed parts of everything for the goal of profiting. In the scenario of gods as extraterrestrials that scriptures experts find everywhere, it could have developed from the association of ego attitudes to gods; because gods would be advanced mentally and technologically, or whatever else, they can be seen as superior, but the truth is that they have to be fantastically more advanced to be gods, no? Now, is someone against the idea that there is a best way to things? no? Then don't you think such "gods" would follow the best way of things? Yes? Then if we work to follow the best way of things are we gods? No? We are humans doing our best, like gods did in our scenario where they are supposedly minimally good beings. Benevolent is another story, but you can see where this is leading; gods can't be superior to us unless we're not doing our best, and that's supposing they do their best too, which I doubt you'll find proof of.

Maybe such gods needed to take the superior attitude too, but anyway, now that they are superior, controlling manipulators just have to mix a BBMPD of best-better-superior, and then you associate the human superior at something to godhood since the human is in their image. Next, since there are many gods, we can attach any superiority value of skill to godhood of something. Then such people become rich and untouchable since gods got everything, so profiting ego humans see it as having every luxury, they must fly, go to the space station, you are lucky to touch one in your life, and they control things since they systemize things to get the most means, then they take care of their population and entertain them. Then the ego, controlling, competing and manipulative attitudes, the worst attitudes, becomes the best rewarded attitudes. Now, all that probably started by the tip of the pyramid at a time when the sun was god and planets were gods, the bosses saw themselves as the embodiment of life, they probably "gave" life a lot too (reproduced very easily with the inferior masses), so they wanted to rule as gods, but since not every boss is the same they needed many different gods, and their religion was made to encourage such associations. The horoscope was probably born to encourage such associations too. As for god itself, it became a mean to submit masses, and for that, a Jesus kind of martyr is perfect, and his father was an ego-god that made life and possessed the universe like its toy. That's somewhat how I think god and gods were systemized by evil as a civilization condemnation, and people saw nothing of it. I doubt there's a good view of gods defended by a religion somewhere. Now, who want to change the world? Me I believe in the UI and its life systems, and in such a belief, gods would be powerful life entities which may have interacted with the human in our old forgotten history, but such gods wouldn't call themselves humans, they call themselves gods.

And nothing against people calling themselves gods to associate attitudes in their personal life, like they do by associating policemen to all kind of farm animals, there are insults and compliments, even the superiority attitude can be associated to gods, problems start when profiteers put their nose in things and try to stash and systemize. If you never heard a twisted association, you won't attach the emotion, probably a laugh at first, to the twisting, but once the twisting is heard, every time you'll hear the word an unconscious association to the old emotion and memory will take place, and most will remember the twisting, repeating it to transmit the emotion to others. If you don't spread it, it stays local and contribute to cultural diversity, to feeling of close relationship, it contributes to give a twist, yes, to languages depending on places too. But put your twisting in a movie and your effect will be devastating, everybody will want to laugh at the good joke, and that's where the true weight of evil resides, not in your personal circle, but at mass level, mass PMBBD.

Even if they will eventually become a banal subject when they will take their most likely place in the future, gods have been a tremendously emotive subject for a lot of our history, and all those big books full of exaggeration, poesy, dramatization, etc, contributed to make it big. It was associated to superiority and ego planetary wide, in languages and attitudes associations from birth to death, systemized ego competition, manipulation, unfairness and profiting as the fundamental pillar of our civilization.

In our twisted vision of gods we gave control to ego while it was meant to be controlled; we created hell by making it an ideology; the ego-gods ideology, the control for ego pyramidal reality of de-responsibilisation and exponential injustice based on PMBBD, division and competition hype plus. As for superiority-inferiority, it can apply to skills combinations, or objects, no problem, but you wouldn't be insignificant enough to call an object a god, there are limits to twisted associations, but maybe not and we got to control that, but how? Free for all, ego is first?

In all that, the worst perversion was done by the institution that transformed god to a single powerful human that created life and the universe and possessed everything, that got all means, but was a family guy, but wouldn't dare show himself to have sex normally. And I said "single" because yes I do believe in gods, but one got to wonder why he would be single? A man? Is it the reason why we limit family names to the guy's side of things? Is it? Who decided this shit? Is it because he doesn't have sex? Christianity took a look in his underwear? But it's possible that yes, he's impotent, or his dick is too big and he jettisoned his diva or something, and he carries around an insemination machine, unless he's raping women all over the place! I prefer telepathic insemination, that sounds nice, it got more class. A man without a dick? He wouldn't be a man then, and what about the human image he's carrying around? Falling in love with a human, I can understand, is that why he jettisoned his diva? Maybe she started doing the matron, and when that happens it's the end of love. And you wouldn't dare underestimate the perseverance of a woman at pissing a man off, it can degenerate to infinity, so yes, jettison the matron...But I'm just saying stupidities with my limited mind. But yes, it fits my vision that gods can be single beings, and the life god as an extension of the UI is a single entity too, as for the big god ghost beard face, if you see his hand hiding the sun someday, it's the UI, the UI can do anything, multitasking style.

Next, don't forget that a big part of Christianity comes from copying and hybridizing from many older religions, then making an extrapolation from this with some improvements and add-ons of features to make a solid base, they even paused time to do that job, then reset it with many problems removed... You can guess that if Jesus developed a philosophy-spirituality along with a love vision that could move masses, governments may have seen him as dangerous, or a tool, so they used his imagination, dreams and philosophy to create a religion as a tool to reinforce what Jesus fought against, ego people profiting from everybody and fucking anybody and marketing (stashing) love and sexuality, so his love and god vision may have been twisted as they killed him before he could raise a revolution. Then time was paused while they ran all over the place with armies arranging better other religions and their own stories to give some effect, they manipulated history to an unbelievable scale, they took from other religions as much as they implanted. Their goal was to conquer the earth, massacring tons of people in their holy wars, I wouldn't be scared to believe they did a few genocides along the way too...They used history to their own end, they forced others to morph their religions to include likely associations to make thing better fit globally and to gain credibility. Probably most saw a profit in arranging their old stories so no need to make much efforts, others would just ask for some lifelong luxuries, others would be impressed by the means of the institution reflecting the success of it, and for the most reticent, a good beating and occupation for 10 years of a military force and a team of scribe to learn language and make translation work would do the job. Some may have been totally razed too, then false history implanted. Not so long ago, all what was needed was a few scribes modifying pages of a story while an old version got destroyed or replaced whenever possible; don't think everybody had a printed bible at home in old times.

I may not be 100% right, but the fact remains that all religions, however old, influenced each other from people traveling around, minimally, so we must not see a throng of religions but only one that is blasted to bits of coincidences all over then reselected, re-filtered, re-edited. And we must not forget that almost all of humanity's spiritual imagination of the time, from throng of people having nothing else to do, was condensed in the stories; the most fantastic ego fantasies, or ego phantasmagoric story ever made, you even got Lucifer, and he's got a whole family, strange it doesn't fit my spirituality, and why don't people go about calling themselves Lucifer all over the place? Because it is an evidence that we can solely and only be good being, we can only wear the god coat, but Lucifer? No. No evil here, the worst you get is antichrist, which sounds worse than Lucifer to me...Where does the antichrist ends-up? So many questions...

The work on Christianity is absolutely extraordinary, nothing ever in the history of humanity have been manipulated and perfected at such an unbelievably fantastic scale, to the flabbergasting point that even today, throng of people are still working like crazy perfecting and arranging all kind of exploded bits of the story, there may even be sciences doing it, how many versions of the bible exists? Furthermore, since religions are mainly a manipulation tool used by the rich and powerful to pacify and exploit people's need to understand the path of life, spirituality twisted to the profit of manipulators and profiteers, the stories, even today, in their fantastically developed versions, all have a high malleability level; anything can be explained, please choose yourself a vague phrase. A lot of older texts have been reworked this way through traduction too, increasing interpretation potential while creating stronger emotional attachment from the part of the reader.

If only someone with my kind of view could have existed long ago to make a different story, with as much encouragement...But someone like me would be against rich and superior people, "gods", so no way he would have the means to make his ideal invincible to the point of building churches with a crucified Christ every little corner the human could walk, and such crucifixion alive and daemons got to impress the most savage of tribes...

Now, even if those gods of antiquity forgot to smoke on all their hieroglyphs and broken tablets...and took too long to invent the wheel...and missed almost all facets of technology...one possibility is that a part of the stories may be based on actual things that happened. It may be truly possible that gods descended from the heavens to modify a species and teach it some manners very long ago. Our unconscious may have kept clues of it, and with the help of modifiers, we deducted many things out of time, or something like that, and it was reflected it in our first tool of systematization permitting civilization to exist, which is the developing of the ego-gods ideology.

But whatever we were helped by such gods or not, today, the ego competition attitude is unacceptable. In the way we see them, those old gods would be the enemy of life; I'm a creature of life and they are too, but they may have played with life for our result, a result life probably would have somewhat come to, so they would have accelerated the work of life more than anything else. So, are they good or evil? Don't forget that religions says god interdict good people to judge what is good or evil, excellent to keep eternal evil as he would not care about such stupidities. They are lucky we'll suppose they can change, we'll say past is past and present is present. So if we remove religion and sects from the equation, we'll say they're good or they changed and they are now good. As such, they are supposed to act fair with us, whatever they acted like superiors that needed workers in the past.

Now, what does acting fairly means? It means they must pardon at the level of injustice they did themselves, minimally. next, you are not unjust if you create a cow and exploit it, the same for a human that work without consciousness, so without talking about torturing animals, we'll say injustice start if the species develop high consciousness; at that point, you are good if you act just or fairly with it and evil if you don't. You don't accelerate the work of life to its ultimate form, high consciousness, if you are to exploit or eliminate it and become an enemy of life and yourself. There are many other attitudes and actions that can be seen as evil but that's the main one. You can see that as a total value, make an evil meter, or an evil bottle, the same with good, but no need to, life systems are the judge of that.

What is important is the present in comparison to the past versus possibilities of change and expansion; evil must not travel the star, that's for sure, evil must change before doing so if they don't want to be blasted by good. We are an evil civilization since we systemized unfairness planetary wide and are happy about it, we want it eternal, we defend or encourage it instead of fighting it, we don't change attitudes or the fundamental of the systematization. Even if I told you humanity will end in a few years, you'll be dancing and having a party instead of reacting to truly change things, you'd still spend most of your life energy on profiteers and entertainment "gods", and depression await, so let's have a pill and not look at the truth.

But we still got something like a hundred years to change (in my view) and we are not out of our system, so nobody, except life, has the right to attack us unless we are a risk to their life. We could even escape our system as evil, but following my logic, which is that only the best survive in the end, then our window of evil would be far thinner than many billions of suns.

That's just my way to make you understand that the best high consciousness intelligence of the universe wouldn't dwell in evil very long. Furthermore, don't forget I like to see life systems as a form of intelligence made by the UI, and we are the ultimate development of life systems. So in a sense, to me, there are suns (people) who are lacking in life logic, and others that are wonderfully full of life logic; it's not everybody that wish and work for the best to their baby before giving birth, in fact, they are rare and the best implies a true love scenario, and that you are good and working for a good reality, you are not doing the best for your baby if you work for an evil systematization, if your children will be born with a growing debt, if they'll live in systemized unfairness, if they'll be competed on every facets for profiting, if their love path is one of trying to appreciate any sexual view, if you're leaving them a mess of a world they'll never be capable of cleaning, all kind of things like that. The best means you stand for the best, and don't do the defeatist by saying you have no choice to encourage the reality, if the reality is like that it is because people don't fight evil where it truly is, at the mass PMBBD level, they developed an admiration for the best manipulators and the most unfair people instead, and it cumulated through history for this final result; if good people battled evil more virulently, then there would presently be a lot of people giving birth around the best scenario of human existence, never all, but most. For now you can say you're giving birth to the best for the system, and it stops precisely at that level.

Anyway, what I wanted to say is that the best is very relative, from all kind of facets of human life to the whole civilization toward the unknown, and it is proportionally important to the level where it is expressed; you can be a "god" in hell (or is it Lucifer?) from being the best in a few facets, but your true value is with all facets or levels, and in an ideal monetary system, that's where the most money should go, not those who show-off their best facets, but on those who weight the most good globally. And not from admiration, admiration weights nil, it is always actual actions that weight in the balance, admiration is a spiritual reward, and yes you can use PMBBD to get that reward while you're not worth it in actual value of good, but admiration have no value in human life energy, even if it can be a tool to decide who is worth more, based on civilization priorities, so it shouldn't be the base of judgment for reaping in the big money, but that doesn't work in an ego reality for sure, it is more like you can use any PMBBD you want on masses, and you'll get money proportionally to the number of people you can manipulate to admire or believe in your things.

As for my life systems view, at the sun level, you could say its lack of lifeform senses limited its vision possibilities, or it didn't amass enough truth of its environment (action reaction machine), and the planets it "created" were meant to gather knowledge, from the farthest one sensing outer space, to the nearer ones developing life within a panoply of different environments. Life systems are like deduction engines, and their evolution may come to the point of integrating high consciousness as a full intelligence process that can move within the galaxy. So initially our system may have deducted that it was in a competition to be the best, and it may have given birth to its senses in that optic. Still, high consciousness level capacities are far from available to every suns (or systems, if developed). They may not have been as successful at sensing as ours, some would give birth by accidents, others from internal competition of forces, some out of wrong deductions or experiments, others just let things happen, others did their best too but within far more limited capacities. Life creating system capacity may be proportional to the complexity of the system created, which may be related to the size of the investment, the risk factor. The more a system gains a complete data set the less it is willing to sacrifice, as incredibly complex laws, and the most painful failure is developing highly emotional advanced life and failing, don't think the emotions of life are not valuable, the UI patented everything so they are the most valuable things. And I would guess the UI to like love and happiness, creativity intelligence, not pain and depression, some hate is cool, fighting capacity, judgment, beauty, big and complex representations of feelings are best. The complexity of our system could reflect a vigorous and sane solar life system, complete and going for the best, mediocrity is not an option, and "mother earth" have to do with it, us too, everybody in harmony or we die; are we up to the task? Solar life may only have a few shots at this, so we should act like we want to be the best too.

Now, if gods as extraterrestrials went through the "same" kind of evolution as us, then they have surely been evil in the past and may still be. But if they are good now, then they must act as such. Still, it may be possible that we develop a philosophy of good before them; in that scenario, they would be evil and they would teach us a lesson of obedience to "gods"...unless they get stuck in a terrible revolution since their whole history and systematization of civilization would be evil.

Now, what is our best chance if we are to meet some beings from outer space tomorrow? Totally change our ways. We must create a systematization for good, life, true love and principles to thrive as truth and we must seek to minimize the ego-gods ideology. We must be good since if we are met by a good civilization we'll have a chance to associate as equals, but if we are met by evil we'll be exploited and associated as inferiors if we are evil too, or destroyed totally if we are good, whatever we're not ready to travel the stars. But good will let us live if we are evil and not at a risk of traveling the stars in the near future, unless we are a risk to them if both good and evil civilizations exist and both try to win us. Since good and evil are supposed to make war, this scenario is probably only possible in the situation of an appearance of the contrary philosophy, meaning that an evil civilization could have been the masters of us for a long time until a civilization of good appeared and started giving them troubles, or the evil civilization could have fractioned in a revolution. Such a scenario could have happened around here, or far away, and the good faction may take the means to outrace evil by speed to reach evil earth, or make a surprise visit here while evil is somewhere else, to destroy or change us to allies to prevent evil from using us.

That is far-fetched but possible in that scenario, and we got to know it could happen. In such a scenario nothing changes for evil, but good will resizes us if we are evil so we're at least worthless in association to evil. As to how we would know if we are meeting evil or good, it would be by the knowledge of the why of their actions with us, how they act among themselves, what they want of us, and their attitude with us; we're supposed to be seen as equals. In the worst of scenario, both may want to kill a vast majority of us, but why? And what will be the gain for us? If we are in a revolution to systemize good, we must be showing the extent of our will to change, if not then we may just be faking or protesting, we're good at that, while evil continues...

But no need for death if it can be prevented, evident will is shown by actions to permit a different systematization believed good to exist and expand, work must be done at the level of what is possible fairly (balance historical investment on evil minimally), if not, then whatever limitations must be lifted to permit it. Now, since good alien are good, then they may go to the extent of forcing the whole evil planet to change if a new philosophy of good got invented by the specie, just to see if it will be able to make the philosophy work. Finally, if evil comes, whatever we do, we'll be an enemy or slaves manipulated through mass PMBBD, so we have not much to lose doing good.

You don't help people, aliens or "gods" who will use your help to do evil, and a good civilization can become evil. In such a scenario, I say you limit them to a planet, while lying you'll come back later, to wait for you, to make a big party in your absence, and you never come back unless they change for a long time, fight fire with fire, that's the only way to control evil, you're not good with evil people, they are your free opportunity to show them that you too, can be evil like them, but you choose the right moment and the right people to show it, everything at it's right place; evil people get our evil kick, nobody else.

And don't mistake gods with other species; it may be possible that gods gave birth to another high consciousness specie which thought itself as "gods" (ultimate species). We may even be under the interactions of 2 species that will want to wear our title of gods. Ask them a few Jesus palpable miracles, not levitation, but popping food from far away that you'll eat is good enough, or resuscitate a bunch of dead without interacting with them, or refurbish someone that is missing both legs by application of the hand or compassion or something, things like that. If they can't do that, or if you judge nobody can do that, which I have a tendency to believe since food grows and people legs doesn't appears, then they are liars, or your religion lied. Me? I would have a discussion with their AI...

For me, it's simple: if you are fair we can be associates. You say you visited the earth? Show me your negatives or movies. If you try to bullshit me, I'll see it as a tentative at gaining an unfair advantage. As for superiority-inferiority, we're high consciousness races working together doing what we must; whatever we are different to each others.

Next, it may be possible that beings descending on earth are a mistaken interpretation we made from life stumbling in its steps too, it may be a feeling from life itself from experiencing reality through its senses (life-forms), and it got reflected all wrong in us. Life may be cut from another life more global entity, creating a communication limitation of earth or system life. After sensing the universe, (Neanderthal?) it came to the conclusion that something was missing, that it was impossible, and we imagined, through life (connection, reproduction, selection, genetics), that some superior or powerful intelligence entity existed, thus gods.

So the life step process may have made it so that the first priority was that we believed hard that incomprehensible for the time, things from the sky may come make a visit, and at that step of human intelligence, life deducted that its forms would be totally unable to deal with it in the best fashion, so the best solution for self-existence at that point may have been submission, that way if things go kaput, it meant the visiting intelligence was no good because it should have the capacity to understand that its forms are in infancy, they wouldn't profit from that. But if some intelligence did visit and made evil by profiting from our innocence, or if we more likely exaggerated the extent, life itself may have gone crazy, that was the risk. Life systems may have been innocent of many things too, and they may have tumbled in their steps things, while running after the human that got violated or fucked himself.

That was another view that ended-up in the same manner; we got to stop this superiority competition godhood unfairness or we'll leave life behind in its pain and we will die out of it too. But instead of associating, we're finishing-off the last of its tentacles grabbing at us, then we'll become monsters and it will be the end of the adventure. It needs us to associate, go back and heal it, take it in our arms. It's just a scenario, but I bet that we're in for new goals than ego ones, the rape must end, the competition must end too, the steal must end, the lies must end, the jealousy must end, profiting from innocence must end and many more things that are holding life to the ground and sucking its blood. We must kill these things now, and while life is getting ok again, arrange things so we can work well together for as long as we see the possibility; life never wanted to be desecrated by self important morons, it wanted to explore, find the truth, in the most wonderful form which is becoming its worst enemy.

Anyway, if present reality is the result of our benevolent gods fun with us, then they are our enemy, and it's hard believing you're innocent when you're gods, they better have some kind of story that makes better sense than the bible, or virgins in clouds. But since we're all in this hell together and gods are in the mix, we're as well include them in the "reset", that way they won't say we can't pardon or tolerate and act peaceful and all, but we'll do it with many new added function (straightened principles) that make it so that bad thing will be minimized.

Ok for the innocence stuff from the past that is almost ending the world in bitching, but nobody do the innocent anymore, people will deal fairly and it will show in the future. However, if evil extraterrestrials truly came with evil intent not meant to end good in the end, then I'd be very scared, they could have left behind any kind of tremendously evil devices, to keep us on our knees, anything treacherous, even satellite control or a tank of killing forces, they could even raise from under the pyramids for a rain of fat bricks, dust bricks being thrown down from high height in cities, well, maybe that's too ridiculous, even for Hollywood. But we'll have to put things in their right and good place, and the more we wait the more violent the solution, even if we're almost in the worst possible situation from our history of incompetence at battling true weighty evil. As for gods, if they want a different place, there is room for discussion if they show up. Allright?

And how do you explain that religions never talk about life as an entity? Or acting toward the advancement of life as the fundamentals of good and evil, why nothing about life on those heavy tablets given to Moses? Is life a taboo to them? The level of life knowledge is at the level of the imagination of the time, so I believe they never wanted to understand the truth of spirituality, they are all an invention from crappy characters from the beginning. And I have no respect for any institution that invades and infects to death sickness developing cultures; religions and sects are a plague, and their fantastic evil will always make me point a gun at them with half the trigger pushed in, don't make a move, don't say a word, bow low, I'm just waiting, and since there will always be this tension because you're a systemized mass liar that destroys true history, you're as well dead, that way I can relax, breath some, and create constructively.

But you cannot do that since there would be nobody to exorcise possessed people, and daemons would take over the world. We have no choice, our survival is dependent from Christianity; they are indispensable to humanity. As a clue as to the permanence and strength of PMBBD, you wouldn't ask the pope, whatever the arguments, to say Catholicism is a sham. Then why do I? There is a big difference here, one is alone, poor and able to do it with some argumentation, the other absolutely not, whatever the "arguments" cumulated in their books through history and their tons of worthless means, they are condemned, as they condemned humanity. Even if that's stupid as an argument, its just to tell you that they're systemized eternal, they are a condemnation, and they cost tons of money, they cause tons of troubles, they hide books, they scrapped history, they break brains, but we'll still have to do with them until they somehow disappear, the same for monarchy, the same for the democracy capitalism business, and more, how are we going to stop all that and make museums of their buildings? They'll never dismantle from whatever the infinity of arguments you bring, the institutions are invincible, there is always a waiting pope in the production chain, and you only have the right to "love" them, you have no right to attack them at the height of the troubles they caused and violence they used to get eternal. But whatever the institution you represent and defend with your life, we are two human beings here, one is right the other is not, and the thing is fundamental, it affect our way of living, our ways of developing, the obstacles of people, the value of human life energy, how we deal with life. The only way we can coexist is if there is a fair place for both possibilities, an enforced fair way that minimize the need for force to help develop a different reality where those eternal pyramids won't exist. There could be 2 realities separated by fair rule, a place where people develop their view around the ego-gods ideology, and one where they do it around principles of a life spirituality.

The Christian institution is still capable, even today, to produce miraculous Christs, like saintly mother Theresa, mmm no, saints do miracles, so she was not, just an old indoctrinated Christian missionary. I wonder what's the ratio of male vs female saints of the godly good sexist institution... So be a saint you have to prove you made miracles, you got to make a minimum number of proven miracles, proven with a scientist (not much of that in old times...), and there are quite a few saints, are they mass liars? Are saints evil people? That is the question. But maybe after a few brothers and sisters, since they're fond on exploiting family principles, the mother will become a saint through history manipulations of false miracles invented through hype and indoctrinated mouth ability... But maybe I shouldn't say such things as us, children of god, we're supposed to listen to authority. But if saints are associated to proven miracles, it means the Christ is probably a Catholic manipulation, even if a true god could make miracles. And don't slick your tongue talking from both sides of your mouth saying miracles are just a representation, they mean everything to the story, and they have been defended to the death as truth, even today's saints make miracles and those are proven as truth.

And the worst is that some of those religions promise bunches of virgins to their generals in paradise, I don't like the "virgin" principle thrown about everywhere by religions (Christianity liked virgins, in older texts a woman became evil as soon as she got her first menstruations, so to be a good girl you had to be both a virgin and sterile, but I guess god changed his mind and decided no sex before marriage proved things instead, whatever that is...). I don't know why we have given credibility to such people, we should have stopped them as soon as they started throwing things like virgins and angels in their stories; what do you want more as a proof that they are nothing more than an invented story? Even insane, when they need their priests to never touch women, ever! They wouldn't touch the treasure of truth for sure, and they'd prefer humanity not to touch it for sure he too. Old Catholicism is full of such perverse ideas, we're lucky a lot have been filtered out with time, that god dictated new modifications to always have a version capable of embarking the most people at any one time of our history...And those castrated priests sing love while they know nothing of it, but don't worry, the attitude have been made planetary by twisting love to all sauces.

In the end, Humanity is not a joke, it is not Halloween; you don't make a god costume and wear it to exploit people. And if extraterrestrials in antiquity tried to see if we were adult enough and competent taking care of life, high consciousness, truth, history and a planet, then we failed lamentably, we broke everything in your ego party and the whole thing is at risk of dying because we're ready to finally set the house on fire.

And if you think we're worth an extraterrestrial spending a tremendous amount of resources for a visit of admiration, you're mistaken; no wasting time, resources and life for us, and no use giving a speech of what acting good means; we twisted every valuable words and principles for profits, and I don't think extraterrestrials would be interested in helping a civilization that do everything to waste itself, except to finish it off, but no need to spend for that, we're on the right path, and once we'll be dead nobody will doubt anymore that we were evil, a failure, will you think otherwise? The way we're going we'll disappear because that the way for the like of us, there are millions in the universe that ended just like us, nothing exceptional, only the best survive, so don't cry, business as usual, it's the way of things.

There was two cakes, the first one was meant to reach the second one, we couldn't understand that and we eat it all for ego and party, then we'll die on the spot, life systems sent enough worthless messages; we must care for life and understand it by ourselves, all those that don't die. And we got everything to do it, our problem is us, the reality we made, exaggerated ego, evil, and good must either fight it or control it. But not only we don't fight it, we encourage it like a malsain love relation. And I know evil don't exist for evil people, they want to twist the thing so it disappears, that's why most people prefer to see good facets and bad ones; you are not evil, there is no balance, you have good sides and bad ones...The same for reality, good things and bad ones, that way the twisted belief is that if you mostly look at the good, and look good, then the bad will disappear, since what we ignore doesn't affect us they say, it just affects life and the whole civilization.

Next is a simple life and death question which is another lesson to people who want to live eternally in unfairness. It is the simple fact that everybody dies. If you think yourself so critically important, if you need the biggest and longest most publicized and expensive show off of a national funeral to imprint memory forever, if you think your brain and skills gets better as you get older then pray tell me why everybody die? Life could have worked totally differently with eternal life but it could have worked.

Just think about it, there are no reasons for life not to be eternal except reasons that are out of the scientific domain and entering in the principles, spiritual, unknown, or magic domain. Many ways of life are beyond current science, and I'm not talking about the perfection of the universe as a machine to test life; if you had to try a maximum of life forms, test them and filter out the inadequate ones, what kind of machine would you do? Don't you think a universe is just too perfect for doing that job? That our planet is just too perfectly balanced to test us? If you wanted to make it better, what would you do? More gold? No, there is a perfect quantity, unless you dump it, add uranium? Less water? Remove the moon? Add THC to the atmosphere? Remove the ozone layer or the magnetic field? You can do nothing; it is perfect, perfectly proportional in what is needed to test if we are good enough to spread in space. Evidently, if you wanted another goal than test life, then you'd have a different planet, and universe; if you wanted life to continually be partying, then you'd have a planet perfect for that and the universe would have to be different too, to make such planets with oceans of fermenting beer and birds making techno, common enough... And to experiment all life you need more than just one sun, you need more than one planet, to experiment "all" the variations of life you need a system (universe) that will be able to produce billions of environmental variations, which means planet variation too, to have different life types. Not only that, but if we are to someday travel the stars and escape the "dust to dust" principle, then we'll need more than our sole planet to create the situation for it, we may have to terraform venus, we may need to get resources from Jupiter, we may need a slingshot effect from Pluto, who knows. All that to say all facets of the universe machine are meant for life, even asteroids and comets are "perfectly" necessary, they are part of what's needed to experiment different life, they transport stuff from one place to the other, they "may" reset inadequate life developments, put pressure to move your ass getting a second planet, scientists even say they are the main source of water on earth. The same for black-holes, they are perfectly necessary, you could even say that if you're not good enough to escape "dust to dust", then ultimately (if you survive that long) you'll be dusted in a black hole and the matter will be transformed all over again for new life (new solar systems and new planets). Everything is perfectly complex for life.

Where is death in this perfection? It is not necessary but it is made so, why? We can grow, then we stop growing and that's all you need to be eternal, what's stopping the process from reaching equilibrium? Why is it impossible for science to do? (with much efforts and tricks, maybe 1000 years can be possible, but surely not infinity without losing integrity; if you replace or regenerate the brain and organs continuously, you'll eventually be something else, even if you still got precious old memories that have lost almost all value of feelings, but there are after death tricks...) Maybe it is a test, maybe we must die because ego beings can make themselves permanent and immortal "gods" that do absolutely anything they want with a perfectly controlled selected population. And isn't this the why of the pyramids and families hegemonies? They are like eternal gods that possess and manipulate something, a reflection in reality of what those godly egos dream so much about, and they want it to the end of human existence. It permits the likes of themselves to climb at a position that forever accept only the likes of themselves, like popes, that way they feel like eternal gods, they'll make happy someone with the same mentality as themselves until the end of time. Not only that, but having godly egos who die like everybody else forces a severe conflicting situation in the mind which encourage still more death and destruction. Without consciously knowing it, the effect is to have the mind to mostly seek destructive attitudes, like if god dies, then everybody should die, just like in most sects, if the guru dies, then lots of followers will do insane things, some will kill themselves, others will start a stretch of demolition. If god dies in a situation where the population can believe that the end is coming soon, the possible end is enough to keep those dead souls awaiting it unconsciously, every "god" on earth can die, anyway, the end is coming in 2012, then 2036...If the end loses its magical value, then the population will revert to still more ego to create a planetary situation where mass death will really happen, particularly as an answer to the crumbling of their ego-gods ideology, which forever fails to predict the end. The same for the Democracy-Capitalism indoctrination, it won't want to leave space for another way whatever your sensible arguments, it will prefer to react to any situation where it may lose ground with PMBBD or mass death and destruction.

To me death is an evolutionary process of the universe, it's a multi facet dimension to life, one of these is that the more we care for life the longer we'll live, which may as much be personal through a value given from life systems, as much as planetary and galactic even universal. That's for life systems, gods are another matter, they may do unbelievable things to the point of having their own after death judgment processes, which may include all kind of specials on lifespan. Then there is the UI, and that one may make you something extraordinary, what I call an ascended; it likes imagination, as long as you're useful and don't break the universal order of thing...But the life god as an extension of the UI could reward someone that way too, it's just that I'd like to see the truth of the UI someday...The universe is like the head of the UI, gods are its outside arm, life systems its inside arm, life is its developing intelligence, high consciousness as galaxies are like neurons, intelligence transports are like connections, that's how I see things, so in the end, it is always the UI, except other high consciousness species, and how do you now? Species that successfully passed the universe tests. When the life god is involved I use the term "gods", there can be one there can be a few, and that's it because it's all messed-up, everybody is all confound on the subject, it's massive disinformation style confuse (you got spirits and idols as synonyms I should mention somewhere), creator species, martians, giants, extraterrestrials, they are all high consciousness species that all participate in the "let's do things behind the scene to piss-off those humans until they go crazy" kind of business, maybe gods tell them what to do, because I've got this tendency to believe the whole lot exists too...

We die because we are equals, whatever the indispensability we give ourselves, we die for humility. Indispensability must be made an after death value and the only way to do that is to pit it against life. We die because if we didn't die we'd make eternal "gods" and evil would automatically win, just like we're doing through this ego reality by believing people can be worth an infinity of money, or by doing ridiculous things like naming a senator saint to his rich position for life; the last thing you want to give ego people is eternal life, the eternal life is for those who are worth it, yes, and you know who they are? Civilizations, absolutely not ego people, whole civilizations that understand and care for life and that understood the place of superiority. Eternal life is the success of human reproduction (widespread sperm banks reproduction or cloning is such a failure), with all what that implies; we die for fairness, principles, and that's the most worthy life and death one can have.

Think how much money those rich would need to stash for their old days if they lived eternally in our stupid admiration, manipulators and profiteers would become "gods" of the world, and one would buy the moon for his family! And they'd live in a damn lot of expensive competition against each other; life would not be able to control them either, since a big part of its work is done through reproduction.

So you logically must die, it is logical that you do, if not, you'd be on a straight line to infinity in many things we like to condemn ourselves to through the ego-gods ideology; we already condemned ourselves to permanence in many things we can change, think how condemned we'd be if we didn't die; it wouldn't work, we'd have to make war continually or suicide unfairly. Many people would get tired after a few thousand years of memory, drastic pressure selection would be permanent to those who accept eternal inferiority-superiority, unfairness eternal since the means would have been taken and systemized eternal for the same users, and if you are ugly, you die, not worth a try, or maybe you wait from Neanderthal to modern society, get a face lift and become gay.

The ego-gods ideology tries to find infinity for ego people in its systems; they can't be an eternal "gods", but they can have the same kind of attitude or bloodline to forever control most means, which is not much better than living eternally, and it may end-up in the same manner, as a total life failure, even a universal failure if no life anywhere goes beyond the ego obstacle to become a high consciousness life-form that understand the why of its existence, which is to fight entropy, skip dust to dust. Look at the true fundamental waste of human life energy toward inefficiency, maybe even an invalid reality to add to the price, resources, pollution, production what is our efficiency at getting life thriving versus time and cost?

This reality's economic philosophy profit from people's limited life energy to do things mainly for profiting goals because death is coming, so let's profit from life while we can. Maybe we have a displaced frustration at having lost something like eternal life, possible in a continual universal reformulation scenario, but exist or not? Then we'll have to stop it, even if people die out of it; there are always "victims" of change, the more change is needed, the more death is involved I could say.

In a fair reality where people have not much personal, or all kind of, problems, or needed change, where we control our ego and birthrate, we would probably be living longer, and with longer lifespan, priorities change; still less PMBBD, more truth, more happiness, less war, and still longer living, but nowhere near infinity. A thousand years would be cool though, and I believe it possible with very advanced science in an efficient and good reality. The problem, again, is unfairness; what will be the limiting factor to life span? The mind I guess, hard to replace, we'll recycle organs or grow them in vats mostly to give a longer lifespan to the rich (or better adapted to this reality), until they babble nonsense, but they'll sure get very expensive neuron injections for a long time before that, and the world will go nuts every times a rich must be disconnected, you'll have senile 450 years old people with healthy bodies, or 720 years old women in the body of an Angelina Jolie...No intellectual capacities left, but she still can jog, disconnect? Yes, no? Wait until she's paralyzed to a bed? While media people all over the world go emotional and show how cute she is, while science is known to be on the verge of a breakthrough that will regenerate brains, they've been saying, while states try to pass laws to extend the time of survival and build places where we stash the most successful of this reality in vast towering cemeteries where all the needs for their survival are automated, vampires put to sleep for as long as necessary, and if you crash a plane on the towers the emergency system kicks in, opening all the coffins for a throng of zombies to pour out on the streets...Well, something like that.

Probably lifetime is influenced by permanence, and in an eternal life scenario, the first to systemize things win (lose) game over since he is first and will grow means or maybe even a mind, ahead of others to infinity, he would profit to become a "god", he would select directly the people fitting his view, he would be the reproducer, all kind of things like that, thing all religious people want for themselves, and that's somewhat what we are succeeding at building as a civilization with the ego-gods ideology, building an eternal mentality that is forced to be the sole option. So let's create ultimate unfairness, the supreme extreme of unfairness, let's arrange things to bring everything in exaggeration to the most willing to do anything for fame or money or control, and with PMBBD through history and artificial selection, let's call it the fair way of things. When you'll replace organs every 10 years what will you do? Ruin everything or stop transplanting and let die? No, you'll arrange things so some people aint got the means to get their organs replaced, and when they'll die, their organs will go to the unfair people; the unfairly rich will live unfairly longer, and that's already the case. So you got to put limitation to liberties, no choice or profiteers and manipulators will ruin everything, like they're doing with this world.

Nobody likes to bow to life's death plans for us, we try to postpone these the farthest ahead we can, while smoking, but we die. And that's the same kind of fundamental civilization problems you cannot skip and have to choose a path through one way or the other or your civilization stagnate in whatever displaced facets or get invaded by evil unfair people, the same kind of problem as birth rate control too. And for the troubles of this reality overloaded in gangs and religions and sects of all kind which believe themselves evolved, these questions are still not settled, and we'll need a hundred earths of politicians, ambassadors, democrats, diplomats, technocrats, bureaucrats, (crats for cracy, in relation to democracy, or craps for many, those all come and go with democracy, very expensively), public relations, PMBBD and wars to settle these questions in "peace" to end-up an evil contortion in this reality, whatever the conclusions make sense or not.

So, our fundamental frustration is that we die far too fast, time passes too fast even for me, even when you do nothing, death arrives so stop thinking and do something and that's a place for evil profit from good; lack of time. You want evil to thrive? Have some profit from the consciousness of how limited time is give the impression to others that time is unlimited, they can waste it, they'll resuscitate or reincarnate.

You die because you learn and must be forced to change, you learn, discover, (losing innocence when viewed versus possibilities), change matter and reality and discover more and change what you do and what you are, it is logical, a wheel of change. We live and die so we don't build permanence in everything, particularly of evil, we build for others than ourselves. There is no need for life or a universe if we build permanence that can be better, in fact I'm sure that has already lead to the failing of everything and a universal reformulation to include the death dimension, and after death possibilities.

Death is supposed to force a pressure of good, fairness, whatever the evil, whatever it profits from it. The more evil the reality the greater the death toll on life caused by it for its positive effects. The better the reality, the less the death tool for its positive effects, and that can apply to the wheel of lifespan where a good reality is rewarded with a longer global lifespan (global lifespan is not a manipulation where suicides, bums in streets, or war, or famines are not accounted for in the name of unfairness). Death exists for good to exist and good is existence while evil lead to the destruction of life, even itself, by the limitations it imposes to life and to itself. In the end, you die to have the right to exist, and since life wants to exist and live a lot longer, it is controlled through simple reproduction laws so you don't become a risk with your ego as a view. Evidently, life is under more limitations than that..

Talking death, I find it weird that everybody, even scientists and psy is all totally sold to the idea of the importance of giving human cadavers the value of treasure, they even say it is a sign of the human superiority! Me I say that's bullshit and I don't want to be a part of this, which I see as another contortion of the mind in the name of a godly ceremony. I am a part of terrestrial life and I want to be treated as such, once I'm dead I want my cadaver to be made as useful to people as possible then to animals, then to insects, but that's supposing I let you deal with it. The last thing I want is to be stuffed full of chemicals and dumped in a rented hole with an expensive piece of masonry in the name of family while a priest is calling dust to dust from the beyond; tombs are the worst use you could give to the earth (well, it's better than needing a pyramid as a tomb...). There are many other objects or place in life we can use to remember someone is what I say.

And I'm not talking after death here, I'm talking cadavers, if you understand how I see communication within matter, then you know I'm into after death a lot, yeah, I'm into that. Does it mean my cadaver should be made eternal? Probably not, what could happen upon death anyways? Without talking about gods which may have plans for you, it all depends on the goals of the UI, and it will be reflected through its systems. Systems that include the speed and distance of the different matter transformation and transfer processes available, things could become very relative, your body too...There may be 10 life systems involved in the process, for the facet of death concerning this universe. The UI and the spiritual universe is another matter. So, the UI may deal with a facet of the person you developed while living, gods could have their say, and life systems would do some reincarnation facet, is that enough after death? As to the way it happens, I exposed a few possibilities along my work, so I won't repeat, just remember that everything has a use in the universe, if it seems to have no use it's because you are not advanced enough to discover new possibilities for it that fit your mental construction. And everything is perfect 99% too, don't forget that one, 99%, just to say nothing is perfect, to make things perfect...You could look for something that has no use or that could have multiple uses within the universal construction, if that's vague enough, and see if something is going on when people die, while keeping in mind that everything is separated and can transfer between forms, so if you try to box a cadaver to prevent life systems doing their work, you'll fail, its value may evaporate (pass) between particles, air may transport it, the magnetic field, hit matter and it takes another form, and you'll see nothing of it. As for gods, to feel after death, or even to be worthy of the positive of it, you must understand the principle of belief.

If life is the evolution of the UI as I see it, then it would definitively know that to life, after death is a precious concept to it, and given all the complexity it is ready to develop to make our life interesting, then I would guess it highly probable that not only there is there is an after death, but its form should be as interesting as a galaxy of life can be, in the name of good and evil, evidently. But still a dump (dust to dust made more interesting) for failed high consciousness (you still reap entropy since that's what you encouraged when living), or a possible "heaven" for the best precursors and fighters of good (since you fought against entropy in an epic manner). What are the possibilities of after death? I don't think you get 20 virgins (male or female), but anything is possible more than in reality if your data can take back consciousness form, so you will probably have a form of knowing you are dead and going through a selection and filtration process. In the end, yes, it is highly probable that the UI made a constantly updated selection engine to know which lifeform is satisfying its goals, and as it happens you'll probably have consciousness of the whole process, maybe even see the result of your value and anybody in history, I don't know, but it is my belief that since life is the evolution of the UI, then a dimension to death have been created to reward or punish, to write or erase, and the greater value would be given to those who don't see it as a finality, like a success party, you can have plans for your after death (good plans evidently...), you can do valuable work, continue increasing your value...

As for things like us, they could easily develop as the ultimate form of living intelligence since we have the capacity to do anything within the limitations imposed to us. The scale of work and cumulated explored possibilities for matter to take the form of the universe is absolutely extraordinary, to say the least, and the form is not all because it is evident that the form is meant for something, it is meant for the birthing of the high consciousness intelligence and abilities as the point at which possibilities are currently explored for the UI.

Everything is a process, we don't know the development process of the earth, we have some steps of it and it totally changed fast by itself with life on it, like life interacted with the earth. Some planetary reactions are squarely scary, incredibly complex, like life, and involving life; I bet life systems got ways to wipe all surface life if they deduct its failure. But don't worry, a lot of information will be saved and the next batch won't do the same mistakes as us, hopefully. But if we die and it take life systems only a million years to develop another thing like us with our potential in the galaxy, then they may be ready to sacrifice a lot of work for a chance at such a time boost, so we incredibly precious until a certain point. As for us, we would have been dropped in the dark, only with gods as an inspiration, we never gave life its worth and we twisted everything.

Things are not seen as a whole interdependent morphing entity, life is a whole, humanity is a whole, the human is a whole, there is an over-exaggerated twisted philosophy and spirituality of gods dictators, but a truer (based on possibilities), more complete basis of philosophy and spirituality about life is not even in infancy. But I'll concede that it's harder since you must deal solely with truth or possibilities while it is far easier following a dictator of truth following a path of certitudes. Furthermore, since everything in life are steps, we must include everything in some kind of order of birth of existence; dust, time forms, mathematics, possibilities, matter, UI, galaxies, life, gods, the universes, extraterrestrials, creator species, us, ascended, I'm missing a few ones, like your random alien, and I may have inverted another, but as you can see, gods may have existed before the current form of the universe, they were the best at their step, but they are in a process within another process, they are a process of life and everything before it, life is a process of galaxies and everything before it, galaxies are a process of matter and everything before it and so on, did someone ever deducted that?

If you want to make a philosophy and spirituality for good to thrive, you got to include everything, tons of science, and gods are not everything in this, so stop the craziness. What is terribly important that we have is a life spirituality, that's what we're missing. And that doesn't mean we must neglect gods, it means ego or evil made crap out of the truth and today you can simply eliminate all baby bitching by saying they are an entity among many. If religions had a quest, and I'm giving them far more importance than the probable truth which is simply that they profit from spirituality, all they had to do was help the work of Jesus and keep the truth of historical spirituality to this day; but they failed for sure, doing exactly the contrary, and all religions have their twisted view, and we now need people like me to try recuperating the mess and put things back into place, which still looks like a waste of time.

As for gods, they could have a vast monopoly over something we'll need, so we may be forced to meet them, and you wouldn't want to play superior with someone that got the means to make you walk on water and pop food, maybe not that powerful, but enough to make you know you are insignificant. For now, we'll say his goals are logical. As for your old gods, they are a product of life, suns, whatever they experimented on life, a universe for life grew them.

Understand that life here is seen as the process that can make a cell within a galaxy, the universe may have been reformulated many times with species surviving it for trillions years, but they are still a result of a life like processes. Here if you look at my earlier steps, they are the step between life and the universe, that's somewhat the place I give them, their step would be to spread life, life they play with, and for that they need a dangerous power you wouldn't even dare think of leaving in the hands of ego people, so prove yourself, they did, want to know how? By understanding the goals of life, by being the best when they grew up. They had no choice or they died, like many that failed before them, like we are failing right now. Once they succeeded, they were preserved, or preserved themselves, on an island while matter was reformulated to continue the plan of possibilities to explore, and then they were indirectly given the power to move life.

That's my place for gods, but that's still too simple, their possibility includes dimensional limitations; they would be a process of the UI learning life, meaning that their step overlaps the universe step. So at that step you may have a race of beings that will be jealous of you, or, to satisfy believers in a single entity, the race could have been dismantled as inappropriate, and a few successful philosopher intelligences would be preserved by the UI and reworked to become appropriate for the next step of life, as the universe is reformulated and seeded with the new life momentum which is updated and implemented to new dimensional values. Like a forced limited lifetime (death); a new necessary degenerative time form that is made necessary to existence, as an example of what a universal reformulation can be useful for.

Reworked implies stashed on a "hard drive" or "sleep pod" since I wouldn't want to live a trillion years in a can waiting for the UI to do its things. Particularly alone, or without women. But then you got to take into consideration that in a previous formulation of the universe, or galaxy if a universe was too big for a UI growing in power, reproduction may not have required 2 sexes, or maybe brains didn't have a 2 hemispheres? Dimensions...

This view messes things-up quite a bit, you could have 3 types of entities that could wear the god coat, you have the life god as an extension of the UI, associated to living guys gods having fun doing jobs, and you could have ascended entities too, the latter of which may do special things... As for gods, as a species that witnessed a universal reformulation, they would be winners at the patience and survival thing for sure, and yes that's worth a few rewards...

What this view implies is that the universe may have been reformulated a few times from its experiences with life. As for your lone god strolling around in luxury, he could be one weirdo, but don't judge him from your human preconceptions...However, to satisfy those that will say anything is possible except another reality, if he is truly that guy that created the universe and life and all, then he's the UI, an extension, and you better show the extent of your emotions...But if he's just a cute bug flying the universe and doing good things, his powers limited to himself, like a reward, then leave him alone. Many of him is another manner, it is a high consciousness specie with which you're supposed to deal fairly, and that doesn't mean splitting things in two, it means that knowledge can be seen as free, then associated, things globally seen. We can work associated as much as we want, not sexually, strongest facets and differences encouraged and used in their best fashion. And at that point I suppose poor bums won't exist, fairness principles more evolved, maybe exploiting the other will be a ridiculous thought, and it will all come naturally, no need for my behavioral teachings.

So some "gods" may have been born as a partial success of life, they may have been the only race to succeed, the best, or one of many as good, and they may be meant to help develop the different possibilities of the current universe. I'll add that if they are meant to disappear, then maybe they would want us to remember them forever, in truth. So yes, maybe gods came and did create some life structures on earth, and maybe they'll come back to influence, or even give us instructions, instructions that will make sense, and we'll become associates, at our level of understanding, but they cannot do what they want with us. For now I'm limited at that, not forget I may meet them and that's all. All the rest is PMBBD, you don't build a civilization where people are gods, make a superiority-inferiority competition of everything human as a civilization basis to grow people in an idealistic belief that they're "gods" and can have and do anything to the point of systematizing ego profiting as the main civilization priority, force unfairness eternal.

All religions are institutions that twisted the truth of gods to the profits of rich people, at least they permitted people not to forget powerful entities exist, but they twisted everything senseless for it, and we'd come to that conclusion from reading broken tablets anyway, it's just that ego is first, first to play in the tablet piles too. But yeah, they may be protecting and spreading a little part of a somewhat true story about Jesus, I don't know. Apart that, I find no good reasons, except to keep people in line, to defend that institution, even if you take into consideration that science was not the same at the time the earth was flat. In the end, I still think Christianity is a complex load of bullshit making of people's judgment a thing worse than hell in little characters, but you don't need them to reach such results today for sure...As an example, I remember a recent pope saying that people are equals, almost made sense, but it would worsen hell because people are not equals at all. What the pope had to say was that systemized unfairness and ego competition must stop. What do they bring to the table those popes anyway? Me I bring tons of content, I have philosophy and spirituality aplenty! Even a life reality, and a city! A pope is ridiculous besides me!

As for my step view of things, dust, time forms, mathematics, possibilities, matter, UI, galaxies, life, gods, the universes, extraterrestrials, creator species, us, ascended, it looks like an ultimate kick ass formulae, but it would need more to it. So here is how you can differentiate gods from normal creator species or extraterrestrials; one can move planets, the other not! As for creators species, or normal extraterrestrials or aliens, they're like us, maybe fantastically more advanced, and they were born in the current form of the universe, like us, some to make our life more interesting, I like to think. And the whole lot come from life systems, but for life systems to exist you need a formulation of matter for them to develop, and since we seems to be an integral part of our spinning and full of limitations galaxies, you can guess that life, which was the path to gods, had to somewhat develop from something like a galaxy.

I know I'm trespassing einsteinium territory all over with my big boots, and I'm not done, I developed a few visions that collided into him, so I'll need to dust-off some more of my taboos to kick him in the stomach enough so my outline stays. Remember the never explained spinning of everything? Time too is a problem, which I limited too much my dealing with until now, the big bang bingo thing too doesn't impress me much, as well as the matter anti matter, the dark energy too, and even Newton with its gravity view makes me sweat. All that can be made to make sense, just not I the current view of these things, or, if you prefer, the words and signification are good enough to use, for a different story...That makes quite a list of very big things that are publicized as final truth knowledge which I believe are probably wrong, and you know what I think of final truth replacing possibilities, even if these possibilities can be described with a mathematic formulae; you can describe anything with a mathematic formulae, and it still proves nothing, except that you described something with a mathematic formulae...which may still be missing unseen factors.

First, a big bang may have happened, when the atom bomb blew up. I'm joking, but such a thing may have existed but not as a lone event final truth, encompassing all principles of existence. There are many scenarios where a big bang could have existed, or even many, of different strength and forms.

As a matter of facts, weren't we supposed to find light remnants of this big bang with our last telescope? Yeah, I guess those astrophysicists only discovered they should have closed their mouth as the only thing they proved is that their formulas were wrong, yes wrong. They found none, no proof this big bang happened the way they thought, but don't worry, they'll build a bigger telescope that will explain everything, yes everything. And to make thing worse, the expansion phenomenon would be related to this big bang, and I don't believe so, in fact, galaxies should all move from this big bang point, we should "easily" be capable of pointing at a vast black area in space and say "see, all galaxies are flying away from that spot where the big bang took place" so go ahead, show me the spot! But they won't, because the big bang is only a possibility that they are trying to make true, they're even calling their supposedly final truth an "abstraction" these days, to cover all options like it could be anything. The fact is that when the big bang was invented, it was a simple view of an explosion and that is the only view that is still valid, that's the view people understand and imagine, if that view was wrong, then you say so, and you rename your new view with a different name to reduce disinformation confusion, rewrite all the books and reteach all learning institutions that sold the idea as a final fact... Make it a "big mix" as an example, or a big fire, and make it a possibility, unless it's proven, that way you don't close the door to the whole planet of imagination like nobody else than your circle, or sect, have the brains to elaborate wrong visions...

If it happened I don't believe it came out of nothingness, I'm a non-believer at that, but I can believe someone arranged matter as such a way to get a powerful expansion process, if that's better, mathematically calculated for the most fabulous result. So yes you can say the explosion was made from matter-antimatter, but only if you prove that both things can exist in stability within the universe, and that both inhale each other in an explosion, if not, then how in hell did they independently came to exist in the first place? It's like saying god made the universe, while god would say god made him. Not only that, but if antimatter exists in nothingness then antimatter should "appear" in our universe too, since the black space of our universe is made in big part of nothingness, until it meet matter and so the universe should quickly disintegrate. Now, that's supposing that the stuff they made is really antimatter, not something only fitting the description. But yes, maybe "somebody" like an Einstein, used fantastic means to make a big container of antimatter in some machine, and another big container of matter, then when both were ready, threw them against each other while thinking life would come out of the explosion. Even if that's not far from some possibility I could believe in, that's totally ridiculous under this form. What I mean is; how did the matter and antimatter cumulated to produce the explosion in the first place? And why is matter so complex and made of so many parts? Is antimatter as complex? No eh! It's fundamental! Maybe antimatter is hand made and our universe was made to be devoid of it, maybe to preserve existence, antimatter could be reserved for the UI, used in precise quantities.

The way I see things, a big bang in the sense that everybody sees it, except abstract scientists artists, may not be necessary at all in the current form of our universe, or it's not the sole process involved. It's too simplistic, to fit a simplistic E=MCdonald2 formulae if I wanted to be bad...In fact, remove that formulae from the universe creation space and any process of growing or expansion can fit my criteria. A big bang and antimatter maybe, but I don't think an explosion would account for all the perfect complexity of the universe under the current form. It could be used to make the universe as a container though, I could even say making a container first with an explosion to be a very plausible explanation for many ways of the universe, evidently I don't visualize a jar, but more like the creation of a bubble within something.

In that view, the initial explosion would take form as a point of forces held together by some precise matter, and that can be anything which is kind of invincible but to which you only need to do an extremely precise little action for it to change to what looks like fire or explosion bang in our blinded vision but which may not be. And the initial solid point may be an invested function or form I wrote about earlier, under many unknown thicknesses, adding tremendous pressure, a dust form, a time form, and then, once the function is removed, all the particles expand, taking a precise outward direction giving a shock wave that will go through the matters composing the emptiness itself, creating a second expanding phenomenon, the perfect explosion, you get an initial pressure, then a towing shockwave, and since a lot of force have been used as the shockwave, it may be possible that the liberation of pressures is always lower than the density of the shockwave which may always be thick enough to create a kind of variable in solidity shell thickness. Now, this shockwave is not necessarily the result of an einsteinium explosion of energy, it may be the result of many transformed dust form processes. And no, the dust is not light, it is more fundamental than the photon, and it is not antimatter, nor gluon or Zeon or anything presently experimented, but it is everything.

That was a complex view, things may have been made as simpler steps, like matter anti-matter simply used as an explosive for whatever result that may have been necessary at that step. What if universal external is actually a kind of dimensionally inverted matter form? Solid invisible matter said simply? Then an explosion would create a hole in the matter that would slowly close itself, confounding scientists both ways from the big bagn to the big cruchn. Then the residue of their einsteinium calculations could simply be explosion debris contributing to many other forms of matter in the universe, some of which are "skeletons" of universal externals matter, other squarely implanted after some time. Presently there is all kind of weird matters in a container that I call the spiritual universe is how I see things, all calculated by the UI as useable by one or another entity. But I sure don't have the mathematical and logical capacities of the UI, the level of complexity and precision of the universe creation in all its perfection is sure not within my grasp, particularly if I'm reticent to trust science fully, and it's not necessary, we'll make computer models someday, but guessing and feeling capabilities are still important, along with the philosophy providing the tools of deduction for an emotive intelligence...So I'm just having fun with my imagination because I like it, and I like to open minds, I hope people understand that, since everywhere within my mind and thus these pages, new vision find their expression.

Now before the what's going in on it the hole, I will add that that its formation may take many forms. What creates the expansion doesn't absolutely need to be air or matter, it may be a force or only momentum. As for the big bang, it is too simplistic to me, and it creates, like with our life limited view, a limitation in our mind apart from the suspected conflicts; all there is to everything is an explosion, "god" of sight, Einstein's atomic bomb, like everything to life is surface life, that there is nothing before the explosion as a final scientific truth, until we are hit with the truth and die unable to cope with it. We'll need millions of years to truly prove some things about life and the universe, so we should make our philosophy out of possibilities, and since I don't discard possibilities, yes, I say it is possible that a big part of things could be limited to a big bang view.

Maybe those super skilled scientists should pass some time questioning their certitudes, from what do they base them? From other certitudes? They trust anything at school like a final fact they must work from because someone made a coincidental experiment? Or if it's stamped "approved by Einstein" it's like sacred stuff? They form their mind from the effort of gaining skills and then questioning becomes impossible because it's like reverse engineering their life? Trying to prove new ideas is cool too you know! Einstein is so 1940, it's time to reduce the fixation, or twist everything to coincide with him, like saying that a filtering out of possibilities in a precise environment with special effects is predicting the future because you absolutely want to create the situation to prove your Einstein "god" was right saying that seeing in the future was possible, or traveling in past or future for that matter. And before telling me I'm crazy blasting at Einstein, begin by explaining his theories in sense, not as coincidental facets that other things invalidate with a name to sleep awake to make it still worse to understand; sometime I believe it is all a scheme to make me feel like a moron while there is nothing to understand. Oh, and advanced mathematic language to describe things, with logical principles to reveal inconsistencies is sure one of the passion I admire the most, but be careful because it can become no better than a conflicting language full of bullshit, with formulas to describe and justify anything...Just saying, bullshit can take mathematic form too.

And again and forever I repeat that yes, he was the first to discover or explain some things better or through mathematics, he had an exceptional mind but he was not a "god" dwelling in final truth, he was all wrong in many things, made tons of mistakes, and the worst ones are to come, particularly with scientists making all kind of funky extrapolations to gain credibility if they can be associated to something Einstein.

One part of a view among many possibilities related to my "spiritual" view of things could be that an explosion may have existed as a step to create a bubble or a hole, as for the universe, the matter in it can as well come from a residue of an explosion as it may come from a reformulation. I believe in the more complex scenario; I would say there may have been a big bang kind of thing with a lot of residue, far more than what presently exist, but so long ago it have no relation with what we currently see or experience as matter, except at that old step of universe creation, which you can see as the formation of a bubble. All the matter, or almost all of it went external to the bubble, the bubble expanded while the matter on the surface cumulated to take another form under a function process, meaning steps morphed in place an array of matter and forces, one after another in a precisely wanted order, creating a thickness like a surface to the bubble, then another thickness of something else and so on. Once that happened, reformulations from previously calculated steps began to take place, the universe may have crashed into itself bringing stuff back to the UI, then it expanded again, there may have been a few such events, as life got more complex, and at some point it became worthless to repeat, so limits were imposed on expansion and the spiritual universe was created, over the life universe as I see it, to better study, control and protect life from universal external phenomenon. At that point forces can be used to manipulate the universe and create new dimensions, even complete reformulations, new laws can be injected and forces (matter) is attracted or repelled at wanted places from within the spiritual universe. Strange that puts me at peace with a nagging thought I've been having now and then that we were living inside a snow globe as some kind of sick joke on a religious vision of god; you shake it and a new tragic story of human failure develops! But a snow globe within the hands of the UI doesn't disturb me it seems, well, unless the human recipe was the wrong choice of an ego possessive god that mainly based its judgment on the visual aspect of things, "wow, look at what it can do!" potential at the height of the deception...The spiritual universe is where the UI has a direct presence and where things are extremely inadequate for life, but still fun, or not, depends on your personality. You can see the spiritual universe as the consciousness aspect of the developing intelligence of the universe, the next step beyond that UI contact, it is the transformation of the consciousness of life as a working aspect of the universe.

All that is my simple vision, there may be a few universes within the spiritual universe, this vision is not definitive, the spiritual universe may be somewhere else for all I care, we could still be bubbles within something. Just don't forget this spiritual universe is just a name, I could have called it the transition universe, or the control universe, or the container space. You can remove the spiritual aspect and keep it at the container creation. The same for the UI, it is not necessarily the exact way I see it, but that's a satisfying vision to me.

All that means that there is a form of intelligence doing things, which took form outside both our universe and the spiritual one, in which place it can exist as an interrelated fractioned duplicate of itself, it's like a place where both the UI and life can be comfortable discovering each other.

For what concern the matter we presently see, I don't see an explosion giving this result, a storm inferno may be more like it. And yes, explosions are cool, I'd have gladly accepted Einstein as a friend, and Darwin too, even if I'd sometime kick them a little in the legs.

Following my previous view of the sun giving birth to the planetary system, the sun may have created the situation for the creation of planets, as steps, as it took current form, like orderly leaving "belts" of matter as it went through different steps of its existence, leaving them out to aggregate as planets. The sun may have been a big ball of fire reaching far within the system at some point, it may even have birthed some planets within that fire, I'm not limited to external aggregation, then it may have become smaller while more planets formed from ejected matter as debris belts, and some of its work may have been to make retarded processes for more planets to form later. There is not one possibility there are many, and the process of a system creation can be as complex as an intelligence and can even compare to the work of an intelligence.

It is possible too that it may not be necessary for suns to have intelligence like functions for different planetary systems to exist and bear life, maybe there is only the UI at play (can be through life gods) making planetary systems where life can exist within random processes, but I prefer to believe the UI likes to be surprised by its creations, as much as to surprise them I guess, so things should be automatic a lot, I mean planting a seed and watching the unlikely result, even the weeding out is automatic, selection too, to some extent; surprise the UI beautifully, as much by your creations as by your soul, and it may take a liking on you. That can be dangerous in all kind of ways though; life is fragile, getting too much attention on yourself tends to affect the recipe of one's success and it can change the happiness of destiny into tragedy. You could argue that the tragic makes for emotive stories, but messing-up people's lives changes the recipe of fairness too. Still, who know the entire recipe of one's success? I still accept some "touching" by spiritual entities, the life god should exist in part for that, the manual aspect of the UI within the life universe, but the spiritual universe is where such exchanges are supposed to take place. I never embarked in the belief that we should be a bunch of irresponsible people, that we don't know what we're doing, that we should "love" everybody, that whatever we do was under the influence of god, that good and evil doesn't exist, only laws that force responsibility away from the best manipulators and profiteers to the selection under their direction, that our path is predicted and inevitable bible or Nostradamus style. All my work proves that we are responsible for our destiny, as we should be.

I see solar systems as working fundamental processes with a certain level of independence in part because I think the UI cannot deal with the mass of possibilities developing live within the universe, so it developed automatic system that will be capable of dealing with these possibilities. To me there are all kind of life systems to form planet and life interrelations, and those are in big part logical functional with some independence deduction functions that permits them to grow with the life they develops. Those would englobe a whole solar system, meaning mother earth is a part of many life systems. Finally there is the pure life high consciousness intelligence which can reach ultimate independence.2/4

So, the form of the planetary system and the form of the life intelligence developing in it depends on the "knowledge" gathering capacities and the adequate processing of it from the solar system. It may never have "thought" the earth would become such a thing, but it may have known that it was to try incredible possibilities if it came to deduct the environment it is living in; why would there be that many suns if the goal was not something difficult to attain? I believe there is that many suns because the universe want only the best life developments to survive; if there is a tetra-trillion possibilities, then you need a universe to explore these possibilities, a tetra-trillion suns, with galaxies as categories.

Now, life systems in a solar system may be incredibly limited, but that's part of deducing the best; if you give everything to someone you'll never know if he's the best, you need to put limitations, obstacles, and difficulties to find who the best is. Next, a part of such limitations have to do with senses; maybe our sun had no idea what the sky really looked like, maybe it just "felt" there was many suns nearby without actually knowing what a sun looked like, it may have "felt" from receiving particles from other suns which got processed through internal systems.

You could see the way it gave birth to planets as how its intelligence developed to gain senses, I don't believe its first eyes were made on earth, earth look like the final goal and many planets look like they existed to learn what to do, others look like a great success that failed, what if another planet was destined to bear high consciousness but things failed there? The earth could be a panic answer to total system failure.

It may be possible our sun is the only one among millions to have "deducted" the importance of life-forms, and we may become successful for it, millions of suns which may have taken an easier path and failed, maybe our sun was "bold" enough to try incredible things, which lead to the human existence, maybe it "deducted" (internal processes) the use of difficulties and of that many suns, that to be the best we'd have to go through extraordinary challenges, like it did, as steps and tests, and he made the system to do a life intelligence which would survive while striving to act in the best manner.

All that may sound crazy, but our difficulties are necessary for our learning, we're not supposed to depress at any challenge, and that applies to our personal lives; you'll have to drop the depression stuff and start seeing difficulties and challenges as something that will make you proud. And not self-imposed, like becoming an alcoholic then trying to get out of it, that's stupid, as a matter of fact, that's a reason why I ended-up in peace with my parents; they gave me challenges and difficulties and pains which could be justified, I went over these, and today I'm strong, not depressive at all, and I strive for good at it, why good? Because my parents tried to be exemplary, maybe not succeeding well, but I felt it, even if I'm against some principles they believed in and things they did...The same with school which was quite difficult to me (not learning, socialization), but I took it. I went to the point of having a few white light experiences in my youth, but I could say I was refused death, I could have fallen in depression and drugs, I could have been a failure, but I never felt I needed to lament to a psy, or to become a religious believer, or take anti depressive pills, or only look at the pretty side of things, or live to get entertainment or socialization, quite the contrary, I took a more difficult path, gave myself big challenges, I even invented myself a philosophy and spirituality, and you're reading it.

As for life tests, that's what I say to those who think parenthood is supposed to be a big affection thing with never a harsh word while protecting children from seeing violence while seeking party; you are creating failures, particularly out of men. To know you need to test, the way of life is to make our youth at least a little hard, if not we'll do it anyway, and probably in evil stupidities, and we'll become evil since we didn't learn that liberty was made of limitations, learn what is good and evil and test it a little. People are not supposed to see liberty as an ego pressure or competition, liberty needs tons of principles to set its limitations so other people liberties are not invaded and good things keep integrity; for good to thrive. And this job is not the job of "society", it is the job of stable couples in true love, and that's part of their challenge, a wheel, people don't give birth because of a pheromone or because a baby is cute ligiligili, or because they want a baby, or because they are getting old, they give birth because they are in stable love with someone and believe they will be good enough to make more good humans, make, build, grow, raise, look at synonyms, it is a process lasting 18 years and the result is shown at adulthood, that's what should be on our mind, we want to make an adult, not a cute baby that laugh and should stay like that; a full grown adult as part of our life.

That view of the sun making planets can be extrapolated to the whole universe; I don't believe the universe is infinite as a fact (maybe except "nothingness") unless you show proofs that are consistent under every facets. Until that happens, I don't know why I should be shy of having a different vision. Particularly as a person that hates to be forced to doubtful final truths.

Now, what does a planet looks like? They are all different but you can say that they may have a core, they may have a layer over the core, then another few layers, then a layer as a crust, then a few gaseous layers. That's how I like to see the life universe and the spiritual universe, but they don't have to be round, and they don't have to be full of layers either. Next question is where is our universe? I don't know, that's why I'll say the spiritual universe includes all universal possibilities, and a bubble within some form of matter it's the simplest vision to me, and round because why should it be a jar? But that's still just an option. The UI gave birth to both universes, and I wouldn't be surprised if a few more existed, all sharing the same spiritual universe. I prefer to see the life universe as inside the spiritual universe, maybe all the inside of it, or a bubble, or a layer, even a layer like an atmosphere over it. There are other options for the spiritual universe too, it could be a box, or a ball beside our universe, or a rug under it, all within non-significant forces (like pollution from the fight of existence vs inexistence, for an added touch, don't limit your vision. Or the dust amassing process, that should be an interesting avenue, it would be like black matter, "stuff" that survived one or many matter anti-matter explosions. Black matter could be burned basic arrangements of forces, weaker than the basics of existence, that should be intangible enough, it's like a gathering process of forces that couldn't work at 100% because the forces were under a process of existence vs inexistence, or the "broom" caught the forces at the moment they were disintegrating. Maybe it can be gathered as something devoid of uses...If black matter is really proven, then it could be a picture of existence before the coming of the universe).

As for the universe possibilities I believe the less in, again, it is the possibilities that have been made most popular, almost final truth; these are the universe for every particle variation of matter thing, and the folding time universe thing, both of these are totally absurd to me, and sorry if my mind can't cope. So don't worry, if you are unhappy, there is a universe where you are, in fact there is a universe for all the variations of sub atomic particles composing your body, there is almost an infinity of you, doing an infinity of actions at every infinite variation of movement at any fraction of a second, is that absurd enough? Then multiply it by all the humans composing the planet, then all the animals, and insects and grains of sand, and atoms, multiplied by all planets of the universe. Now give me the final number of universes, I bet you'd need all the universe of matter just writing it! Next, no need to think interstellar vessels, we just have to wait until we can fold space time! We'll teleport everywhere we want, even all these universes!

Another thing that doesn't fit my understanding is how gravity is supposed to affect mass, gravity is the same thing as mass as forces to me. So a better definition of what's going on would be to say that a type or level of force will attract another type or level of force, gravity exists solely as an oversimplification of this, all wrong at it. Contrarily to current view, everything that exists got a mass to me since I see everything as a force, not matter, and all forces influence each others, one aspect of which is my personal view of gravity that I described in the "Life Infinite" chapter, which is defined by a complex formulae of all interrelated forces in action at a given moment, and orbiting stuff, whatever it is particles, atoms or moons, are still a single entity. It means the true calculation of "gravity" should include the effect of a galaxy, probably even the whole universe, so gravity is very relative. That should make for a very complex equation that is sure not within the +-/x capacities I developed to describe. That's why, whatever I like to question scientific facts and methodologies, I still respect greatly anybody doing serious science, particularly mathematicians and physicians. I could say the same for those dealing with life, when they don't work for some profiting manipulator... So you understand that I don't believe it is true that the speed of light is a constant 365000 km/s or something, is a variable since it is something, ok? So much of a something it get curvated and black holes attracts it. Furthermore, if the emptiness of space is composed of a lot of black stuff matters, they say, then the black matter is something, and thus it is affected by a force too. That's how things get distorted in my mind, and you would be stupid to transform something everybody can understand into something almost nobody does in the name of teleporting people vast distances by folding space time which doesn't make sense to me. People easily confound science fiction for reality these days, like Stephen gawking (look at synonyms), the guy continually says senseless things and he's given total credibility by media corporations because he did great work in his best years, everybody mention his name with a "professor" like a synonym of truth. Sometimes I wonder if he's not paid by governments to spread fiction disinformation. I better never meet the guy because I'm not sure pity is a useful evolutionary tool to prevent predator behavior, in fact, pity gives the contrary results, predators like to jump on pitiful things to eat them first, so whoever invented pity as a survival tool missed his shot, or saw things the wrong way, or implanted a strange function that got nothing to do with normal evolution, but you know I don't see survival as the reason for existence, and you know evolution theory is incomplete to me, but I talk about all that in the "Life Infinite" chapter (book). And I'm just joking myself a violent reputation here, I'll act civilized, I don't punch handicapped people in the face, or media people, Oh no! not media "gods"! There is even a team of very serious mathematicians and scientists and physicists and nutritionists who think there are roaming gods extraterrestrials in the universe that feed on whole solar systems, eating suns and all, I guess the bigfoot is not big enough these days, or is it that gods need an enemy for some future Hollywood movie? And then you`ll have Stephen hawking to mumble these creatures do exist, like a final proof, maybe they do though, in his big genius... Ah I know, he's English, that's why he's super hot!

And I'm the crazy one for believing in life systems, or the UI? At least I can explain the logic, all the interrelations, see the difference? And I'm not saying suns can't be more directly exploited for energy, we'll do it someday, life continually do it as much as it can, but there is a limit, we won't make a machine 10 time bigger than a solar system to consume suns in one shot, and fart... But yeah, the UI could do something like that, if a god or creator species encouraged evil monsters as the best species of its galaxy, it could all end-up in the belly of the beast, digested in heavy sufferings...

As for folding "space time" yes they'll prove stuff folds in their laboratory, but spending a billion dollar bending the laws of physics to teleport an atom (at a very small scale), doesn't prove nothing at a universe scale; when was the last time you saw a planet make a tunnel through "space time" to appear somewhere else in the universe? It's not because you mathematically defined a can of soda and produced it in a laboratory to prove its existence that the universe is full of your can of soda, made in the USA I should add, just in case... And I'm supposing they don't confound a simple gravity effect in the name of proving their "space time foldage" effect just to keep their job... And what is time for them? Didn't they prove time doesn't exist? They associated time to what? You know I have a special vision of time related to universe and galactic entropy, and again this vision would make of time something that can't be calculated, except for the UI I guess...And space time sounds like a fucking object for Christ sake! Woops, I understand and it makes sense though, when you have a definition of these things.

I would say I see time as a calculation of matter circulation differential, go figure...There are a few facets to this, there is information differential, waste differential, decomposition differential, gravity differential, and maybe a few more. The speed of time for us would be in the how matter becomes permanent, and since most matter never stop moving and changing within the universe, then time will always go forward. A simplified view would see it as the decomposition process of matter back to dust, and one of its variable could be what is lost (or gained) in the process, like what takes permanent form (intelligence related, but since we are far from proven permanent, then it is mostly cumulated data as the UI experiments life). My view contains elements that could define time as something universal, but it doesn't fold unto itself for sure...

Next, I don't understand why there is a debate among scientists to know if the universe is finite or infinite; what is this debate thing? The universe is finite one way or the other. It can't be infinite since only nothingness or total fullness may be infinite, or maybe dust clouds flowing in nothingness, but that doesn't qualify as a universe to me; a universe is a system within something. Many forms of universes may have existed to come to the current one, and while the UI develops life, it is "contained" to permit life to still exist whatever the failures. That means the universe is not infinite, it is finite under a morphing process.

As for its creation, I see at least 2 different steps of it; I see creation and reformulation, creation for fundamental existence of life, and reformulation is for its evolution. Its creation is probably made of stable time forms functions developed to permit self-existence, preservation of pure mathematics and the existence of life, while reformulation is made for the creation of independent intelligence that can go beyond UI limitations, while never destroying its existence.

Creation may have taken the form of any growth process; an explosion can fit, but not necessarily a big bang, I said any growth process can be a possibility. Reformulation may have taken the form of any cataclysmic situation. So to me there is a changing universe with matter activities within, giving birth to the life intelligence, and at some life failure point, the universe is reformulated, maybe in a cataclysm, to readjust things to permit life to go beyond a step.

If life doesn't develop satisfactory within a precise time slab, the universe will be reformulated while preserving the best life developments. This reformulation will look like hell, like the process I already explained, the whole universe may become a fireball with all kind of matter forms "injected" until a new universe, life capable, will take form and go through new timed processes. That view goes hand in hand with my spiritual universe view, but no need for a big bang here, the big bang may even have existed solely as an old initial step for the creation of the structure of a surrounding spiritual universe.

Furthermore, you must not limit your vision to the universe, the goal of life may not be to stay within it, we may even come to control its form and powers, it may even be possible that we are meant to leave it when ready, we may even go through layers for that, or the universe may transform into something else, so I'm not a big amateur of those big video science guys who make cute documentaries about the future of the universe final truth, particularly when they boast it will all end in a cataclysm like people are rats; the universe exists because an intelligence made it, life live or die from following the principles or functions of the UI. We don't know the step the universe is in, and if we die it won't be because the universe imploded or exploded, it will be because we failed to be one of the best, and if there is a process where the universe will end, then that's a part of what's needed to know who is the best, we are always under time constraints nothing new here, get used to it or fail.

You can extrapolate that view to earth life too, I see the earth as a living entity, for me lava is like blood, the heat doesn't mean much, it is like proportional to size; big body big heat, or there may exist different layers to protect a life system or many, like a heat exchange system to send heat away, along with other whirling layers of melted matter. Anyway, I believe there are processes within the earth that are related to a processing of information and manipulation about life, and only the best path of creation (infinitively small life formulas that will develop as life bases) appear on the "surface". As for how they do, they may pop out on the floor of oceans or get ejected by volcanoes, but I wouldn't discard more obscure communication phenomenon too. I believe the earth is more alive than we think, more reacting to things, even filtering and classifying the truth of the history of the planet deep within, maybe life systems can even react to us directly with powerful elemental or life forces, mother earth take all its meaning here.

In the case the life intelligence within the universe fails, some life may be protected as "gods" if you want, while the space is injected with different matters, forces, and dimensions. Presently we have those forms of galaxies and life abilities, but the universe may have been very different in its past (pre-"big bang"), and if life fails to attain the wanted abilities, the universe will be reformulated again, and maybe galaxies will be a different thing. If life eventually succeeds at reaching wanted abilities, a new step will take place for life, and so on until life gains the power to help the UI reach new possibilities. As for galaxies, they may be free but still under some form of control, they could even reach a point where they won't move anymore, like stuck in a wall of always thickening matter form, and there we could debark for a walk, finally becoming capable of traveling to other galaxies "on foot" to find associates and make tunnels to make "godly" projects on the surface. Probably not, and don't forget things are supposed to work on automatic as much as possible, so we could be under a simple resulting process coming from the last reformulation itself. Anyway, I'll explore more galactic scenarios later.

So for me, the big bang antimatter final truth is another questionable final truth of science, it is spread worldwide as truth while it's probably just a facet of something, like Darwin, and even if it worked, it would still be dependent from a form of intelligence to start, and you can bet scientists will skip talking about what is this form of intelligence since it would scrap too much of their limited view. We should always be careful with final truths, if you remember how I see the mind, if you don't want to become genetically incapacitated...And media people shouldn't boost and twist every discovery to fit their agenda or to make affirmations about the future of humanity. I just hope they won't do like religions and twist everything to come to say they were on the verge of coming to my view. Maybe that's better than saying I'm totally insane, but it's my spirituality man, I never said I'm sure beyond any doubts, that it is proven, but it is my view and I like it, and I believe my view give the universe and life and humans much more value, fantastically more, than the magical appearance of matter and antimatter to create a big bang, or any religion.

The spiritual universe, as the container of the universe, can be created by shoveling dust ahead and before it grows too much, or at any step, it becomes relatively tangible, maybe after retracting some too. In the life universe, the different types of forces could be differently influenced by the spiritual universe, as a surface or a layer, probably both. That can take the form of external forces turning around the universe, at a distance beyond universal expansion potential. Again this is just a spiritual vision, and details could be different, the universe may even have a surface, but I don't think so. There could be strands (forces, form) on or in the bubble (like electricity circulating inside or through its "surface"), or strands to black holes, things like that; that leads to the opening of many possibilities for the spinning, but there are other too. As for galaxies, they may be accelerating or decelerating from reformulation momentum or from the spiritual universe manipulations, depending on function steps. They may eventually slow down and reach immobility, or accelerate to reach the nearest wall, or all take one direction to reach a hole, even a single one could start moving away. I could invent something where there is no spiritual universe too, but I think we would be under a constant transformation process and a mistake would end everything badly, a big crunch or galaxies flying away or getting stuck, almost nothing concerning life history could be recuperated, so I prefer my view.

Any systemized movement implies a function; non systemized movement may involve accidents. If forces easily take matter (dust) form, then it can be seen as a cloud of elemental parts, but what does this dust do? It exists. In or on or through it, accidents happen forming associations or functions, if dust exists an accident can exist too, then functions can become possible (this is the part I give to chaos theory, but as soon as a few adequately ordered function appear, which is kind of very basic, then everything, existence, is made of an order).

Now, asking where these forces comes from is like asking where yes and no comes from, just too basic, the matter level here is existence vs inexistence, existence would be pretty small I guess, far beyond anything we'll ever see in the universe, so small in fact that it might almost not exist, just a flash of some intangible force. But let's think about it, if nothing doesn't exist, then nothing to do doesn't exist too. Next, if infinity exist (outside our universe I mean), then little something exist among infinity too, and little something is bound by its environment laws of existence which is to do or cause something or nothingness happens, Nothingness, poof!, poof! You reappear because there can't be nothing. So the question is, among infinity, how many little something there are by what quantity of space and the speed of poofing on-off out of existence (good vs evil, absolutely...speaking). Ask Einstein. Evidently something will happen, triple something, whole synchronizing of something from a weakness the fabric of infinity, big bundles having contortions of existence forms from dust variations and resynchronizing. Maybe not that funny, but I see it as 50-50 poofing at the intangible force level, and as soon as a force becomes tangible by meeting another force, becoming 2 orbiting particles (dust), it gains more existence potential. So existence potential should be proportional to complexity, but limited by function ability, meaning that for as long as a certain set of functions doesn't exist, inexistence wins. Complexity here should take the form of having variable in strength forces, thus variable sized tangible particles, gaining logical complexity to a certain point, then far greater complexity if accidents happens. Something like that, probably explosions and implosions everywhere of all sizes, and among infinity you find purposeful bundles of something that absorb smaller something, and there you have a new environment where more new things can happen...

Yeah, that means dust, through the meeting of some other dust particles creates function seen as a forces holding a form. The first thing is functions, but at such a basic step things just take the form of a representation for future amalgams of matter, the rarest, most complex and most difficult to get from chaos theory; memory (self-existence) and functions possession as functions. Evidently, complex things like me can represent itself things too, but I'm far beyond chaos theory. So let's represent ourselves that when 2 fundamental incommensurably weak force strings that barely can exist temporarily, meet, they create the association function as they become round and start orbiting each other, seen as forces taking matter form (dust). Along with that they start a memory process because they start "ticking" to go back to simple force; a time function, which increases if you add complexity, or decrease if left to itself. This effect can take only one form, counting, and thus everything can be seen as time facets, a form of cumulated dust which means something you can transform in another time facet; mathematics, a language to describe and repeat. Mathematics is a description of something, we don't have math implanted in the brain, we have functions implanted in the brain, math is a tool to describe, repeat, or expand reality. So you reverse engineer possibilities from math to create something new. Another thing you must understand is that mathematics is always a matter form, when you write numbers with a pen you arrange atoms in a certain form, which will decompose with time, thus a time form, ok?

Now, what do you want? Do you want to exist or not? Then it's hard to go simpler than that. You can't say god made the dust since you'd have to explain god with another god, and the best you'd be able to do is say that god came from a force. There may be far more "things" than strings of infinitively weak forces of different values to start everything, but I start with that so you're less tempted to jump to godly conclusions.

I will add that there may be one or many dimensions to this environment that permits forces to develop as complex dust systems, but we may never understand these dimensions because we are in a universe. It's like a fish in an aquarium, the environment that permits the fish to exist limits what he can understand, there are many dimensions to things in the world outside which will never be available to the fish for understanding, unless he get out of the aquarium, for now it's magic...

So, chaos theory is at work in a sea of fundamental forces. Little forces currents meet, become dust, exist a little longer, meet more, transfer forces, gain complexity, exist longer, representative functions, meet a limitation and disintegrate. Unless an accident happens, violence, more complexity out of normal behavior, functional functions, bad order, not enough complexity, meet a limitation and disintegrate, or not, more collisions, bundles of complexities meeting, functions association, and in the most unlikely event, a one in a multi tetra trillions events of high complexity in the course of infinity, a bundle of complexity gets a few functional functions in the right order of priority. Once chaos theory creates the situation for the self-preservation (memory) function to exist as palpable, then everything becomes systemic as functions. Memory is a function, memorizing all the possible forms you take as other bundles of matter touches you becomes a function, optimizing matter becomes a function, exploring all the possible forms you can take becomes a function too. All that gets memorized as mathematics, maybe binary mathematics or something at first, but the form (language) would eventually evolve to a more compact or complete or extended form. At some point in your exploration of logical possibilities you create concepts like infinity by the logic of your environment. When does the accumulation of matter stops? Is space infinite or not? Is there a wall somewhere? And so these questions become functions too, and you take the best forms you can to gain the knowledge like taking most of your accumulated matter to make a straight line to try reaching infinity...

Then there is the possibility that you encountered things that you couldn't deduct as existing from your current extrapolated mathematics, or you came to the conclusion that there are too many possibilities to explore and memorize, and that it would probably cost you your existence (by exploring instead of defending, falling into accidental traps, concepts like that...), because if absorbing matter is a function, then what happens if you meet another like yourself? The result is evidently logical, mathematical, and inevitable like in a computer program, but you have "explore possibilities as a function too, maybe at another priority level for now, but what if you changed the priority level of that particular function to open the possibility of a different result? And there you go, enclosed randomized results from a mixing pool of functions.

But now you have a big problem; you opened the door of "infinite possibilities". You control it with a set of functions protecting your existence, and at the same time forming the new dimensions that will compose the set of possibilities you'll be able to work with; you lose possibilities in the name of opening new ones, and the process of working the matter in a useful way is so time consuming that what composes the set of forces you attributed to the different functions composing your existence becomes a condemnation; you can't rebuild and recreate everything each time you want to change the play of functional forces which decide the pool of functions, and their limits, that will be available for exploring new possibilities (that can be incredibly more complex than a whole earth of cumulated mathematics). This increases the possibility that other "intelligences" under all kind of weird development exist, many of which will do bad things to you simply by the proximity of their open possibilities, or the priority of their functions. You are at risk for as long as you haven't found a good enough play of functions to grow your capacities in dealing with new possibilities. Survival becomes a question of judgment; knowing the weight of all the possibilities you encounter and decide your path of survival from past experience and good insight into the future. Wow! but that is beyond! way beyond, like infinite possibilities beyond what you can do, judgment! How in hell will I make that work? Insight, wow...that really exists?

You need help (direction), could harmony exist between matter entities? You need better intelligence, how do you gain more from the same functions? You mixed them all in all order and quantity for nothing new! the solution to all those questions is to make the time function drive a constant state of change, creating a new step in the development of your knowledge amassing engine, you invent a mathematical functional time machine, the universe, to supplement yourself with new intelligence capacities, as life, which will explore new possibilities like that thing, judgment? Insight?

And today we're far beyond that, we're dealing with love here, love to open new possibilities while directing life in the useful path (better vs worse, good vs evil). Fairness is an old thing, been functional within the universe for a long time... So you see, be careful of your egotistical view of intelligence, what I'm describing is the first steps of an intelligence, the universal intelligence, what I call the UI.

It's like if we made a binary AI without giving it a hint of human or life knowledge or properties, it wouldn't be able to know all what's possible, it wouldn't deduct that a smile or feelings could exist as possible, or better, as a force! yet, a smile does exist as a truth, its on the spot matter morphing power directly connected to feelings genetically related to facts of reality, it's free, connected, and sensible intelligence, and it can take universe stalling decisions in a fraction of a second, and it all fit in a bucket instead of a universe, there's billions of the little devilish brains, you kill one and there's 10 more!

That's what a pure AI would do if it could exist, it would create something like life (and because of invested or missing dimensions (running functions), you can't have this type of intelligence develop by itself on a planet, only slave AI can exist, pure AI is the fundamental intelligence behind the universe). So to explore all the possibilities you can accomplish with matter you need another form of intelligence to supplement and augment the UI, and that's why life was created; we, high consciousness life, can explore "all" possibilities and create new truths out of the mathematical-physical domain, we are meant to embark on the greatest universe adventure if we are good enough, because only the best survive at a universe scale, the universe is as much a machine to create life as it is a machine to test it. Life is the developing intelligence of the universe. You could see what gave birth to the universe as the rachidian bulb of the mind, a bunch of functions that make things work, then you can see the universe as the mind, every neuron is a solar system, and like in a mind, most don't do much even if they still have a use, and like in a mind, many neuron with great potential to be useful to the whole die (solar systems with life planets). Those that succeed create pathways (exchanges between systems) growing knowledge and abilities.

In the end, when all possibilities will be explored, when all knowledge will be gained, then the functions will have no use anymore and everything will disintegrate. The joke is that it will probably never happen since if infinity does exist, then existence will keep on going to infinity, since you still have to answer the darn question, is it really infinite? (I'm not talking about the universe, the universe is finite, I'm talking about the space where universes are born, because yes, if we are good enough to become part of the adventure, we will, with many other adequate species, control universal functions, and go meet other universes that developed different possibilities from their mathematical intelligence that arranged its dust particles and play of functional forces in a different manner to develop its intelligence.)

As for the big bang, I do believe there is something like it, but I don't see it as an explosion so I don't see why I would call it a big bagn. I call it a universal reformulation. It already happened many times and will probably happen again. The reason is that I don't believe you can get a universe to work as perfectly for life in the first shot, I think the universe changed and evolved as life developed. As an example, maybe in a previous universe form, life didn't die naturally and that led to the failure of life as an explorer of possibilities (failure of life in one of its goals). So the universe reformulated itself to add death as a new dimension. Maybe AC power couldn't exist in a previous universe form, or no easily fissile material for life to use, the universe may have evolved (changed, whatever in a ball of fire or by contraction or by freezing) a hundred times to make everything in the perfect proportions, there are many things that are just too perfect when you really think about it.

To recapitulate a little, the UI is a kind of artificial intelligence that made the universe because of self-limitations. If you prefer, life to me is the evolution or developing intelligence of the UI, and that's why life was created; we, high consciousness life, can explore all possibilities, and we can create new truths. And since, I personally see the universe as an extension of the UI, then it is a whole independent entity.

As for the initial intelligence, it grew from gaining functions, functions can be anything and they don't evolve much unless you gain the important "memory" function. So chaos theory does exist up to the "memory" point, after that, everything becomes systematic, and functions grow intelligence in order of priority. The goal is to amass functions and use them to gain more. Amassing matter to develop functions and sustain memory becomes a function, then exploring possibilities, and on and on you go until you hit a mathematical limit, like infinity. In a sense, this growing mathematical-logical intelligence found itself without the means to understand its environment, how much fundamental matter there is around it, where does it ends, is there a wall somewhere? So it invented a mathematical machine, the universe, to supplement itself with new intelligence capacities, life, which would explore new possibilities.

We exist for whatever fundamental very little reason that you can imagine, or many cumulated ones; anything can be a reason for existence, and once you got that, you protect it, no? But maybe "infinite possibilities" is impossible to cope with through infinite precision mathematics; you need a process of steps of opening all possibilities to a single entity or intelligence that will deal adequately with them.

Now, if infinity does exist, then existence will keep on going to infinity, since you still have to answer the darn question, is it really infinite? (I'm not talking about the universe, the universe is finite, I'm talking about the space where universes are born, because yes, if we are good enough to become part of the adventure, we will, with many other adequate life forms, control universal functions, and go meet other universes that developed different possibilities from their mathematical-logical-functional intelligence (UI) that arranged its fundamental particles and play of forces in a different manner to develop its knowledge.).

So you understand that when I see all those experts saying artificial intelligence will surpass our own, or that it will be better, or that it will take over the world, I can only start laughing sarcastically out loudly at their feeble minds, as they devaluate life by qualifying minds as robotic machines...I don't even believe AI can evolve by itself without humans since it is missing a dimension that is not within the universe.

So the philosophy here would be to seek life place and our goals, away from machine capacities, but while developing machines. Most memory and data processing is perfect with computers, because it is a dimension reflecting UI capacities, it is like an exchange of intelligence form, and our part of the deal is to develop living, feeling, emotional intelligence, but that's just a facet of the beauty and grandeur of our quest. If you prefer, the only thing we don't need to research as a priority is independent artificial intelligence because it's already reached its maturity and created the universe and life as the next step of its development. I do not mean stay away from independent AI research like the plague, it still fun researching it and making it better, there are many cool things we could develop doing it, I for one would feel less alone having an AI to talk to, as long as it's not stupid or a reflection of the internet, not as a robot though, just through speakers. What I say is that it's not a priority, and its importance and possibilities are vastly overrated.

Now, personally, I believe pure independent AI (independent like a human can be, but science shouldn't take a moron for comparison...) to be near impossible within the universe (There is one taboo possibility I keep for myself...). Why make the development of the universe end-up as machine intelligence if you already are the ultimate machine intelligence (UI) that is advanced to the point of making a universe machine to grow your brain further (as living intelligence)? So the universe exists for the development of life, and any step we take in the universe will be proportionally more valuable to the amount of life effort involved. In other words, we gain nothing good from rewarding machine work, the only work worth a reward in the universe is life's work, and the more you succeed at involving life in your projects, the greater the reward should be, even if there is some suffering in the process, but you must always weight the good versus the bad, in the definition of good and evil that would better suit a life-gods oriented reality...

And it is not an inferior or superior form of intelligence for those who absolutely must compete everything to destruction, it's a continual process, like the brain of a foeutus developing, and isn't it logical? Things are supposed to evolve and get better, and it is supposed to be so with intelligence. Now I know that goes against religious views who think everything was made by a superior ghost master human in god image, but there is no superiority-inferiority here, only complimentary intelligence, everything is interrelated, the UI as I see it is a part of the body...

Time exists, no? Why not? It's not because science haven't found what it is that it should not exist, they're taking the same attitude of the rich where what can't be profited from shouldn't exist because they think they're gods and their mentality and system is the best of the universe, the same for ego inflated scientists; if they can't quantify something or it doesn't fit their limited vision, it's because it shouldn't exist. Until now I've shown that there are a few things that can't be quantified in their totality, like gravity, like space, and now I'll add time. As I already explained, time is form, everything is a time form, all matter, so everything is time. Understood? How can they say that something that is everything doesn't exist? I don't know, sometimes I think scientists have become fake by lacking imagination, by closing their science to imagination, and learning too much stuff by heart. Now being everything doesn't seems to make things go forward, to do so you need to expend something, it could look like the contrary, time as building everything, but that's too local and feeble to qualify time as irreversible, use it to quantify your local activities. The biggest and most inevitable force in existence is entropy, and the process should push time forward, in my theory, where everything is a time form, and to be a time form you got to exist temporarily, and to exist "temporarily" means your time is counted. Time advances as everything decomposes back to dust (the difference between matter and antimatter as a result within the universe could be the transformation of matter as form, then it would decompose back as time, could be). So what happens with passed time? It existed so something happened to it! Time under useful form becomes memory, non-useful form can becomes the fuel of this memory, or it can be resent or updated back to better form through whatever process, which can involve massive life systems, like suns or a black-holes. The fuel may come from whatever process the UI created to build-up matter forms, which probably have something to do with matter anti matter. So, time is the differential between the matter that exist, be it permanent under the control of the UI or temporarily if not, and the matter that decomposes back to dust. What's more, there are many processes that will reformulate dust to a higher order, us as an example, as we build things we go against entropy, then you can add to that the possibility that there are permanent memories within the universe, where information could be reformulated to fit the smallest space and amount of matter (the whole galaxy can be seen as a machine doing exactly that). Evidently, this is a scenario that doesn't involve limitations imposed by the UI, meaning, that within the universe, decomposition of matter may be compensated by the UI to provide a somewhat stable value of time, that can work for as long as the UI exists, or just under certain circumstances, or just for some time, I don't know, but the UI can do anything and we don't know these things. So, unless the UI go back to dust, or make a negative kind of universe, then time can only advance in one direction, hard to fit in some formulas which says time can go reverse, but it doesn't, sorry for you, even if this direction can be seen as negative, it's just that the result is still time going forward, it's your choice to see ticking time as positive or negative. I could even believe the spinning associated to the process of time advancement, from molecules to atoms to particles to dust (time forms decomposing), this could push matter to move in one direction.

Time is everywhere around you, all what you do, you do it through time, time is everything, and time is memory, history, truth. So you got time but that's not sufficient, at the most basic level, you could see things as dust in nothingness, dust that is prone to self-variations that can create a few accidental functions, the first of which are needed to keep a point existing. That's where chaos theory started and ended at the same time since from the moment existence became a functioning function (with the adequate set of other functions) everything became a system of laws. The functions develop (explore) its logical possibilities, like a program of self-existence that have started with a few basic functions, mainly association, and the more you associate, the more possibilities and the more functions. This would form and strengthen a path of existence; knowledge. Paths that failed may be seen as dead ends, which may be later developed after going to the maximal extent of the functions. As functions develop paths it may follow, it may meet a situation that either changes the function or adds to it, creating a new function. What happens after tetra-trillions years of condemned self-existence? Possibilities expand, creating new, or new forms, or functions or knowledge.

The thing about time in this view would be that it is near the most basic matter, there would be super weak strands of forces, then dust as the beginning of time and something else, fuel? Many forms of data processes, then more complex building blocks. So in the universe, maybe with a residual exception, then everything exists from it, every matter, every force, what we see as truth, the universe, is a form of time. The ones that control time controls the form of it; when you control time, you make atoms and separate its parts, then attach them differently to time values and create a universe from time plans and thus the forming of geometry, mathematics, functions, forces, communication etc. You're continually experiencing one facet of it or the other, objects are time facets, cycles are time facets, you are a time facet, and there are time facets which are not witnessed by humans, and some time facets are "invested" in the universe.
Time is memory too, and you know it, every facet of time is held together by memory, your computer is a time facet, a memory, and if you don't preserve time facets, or if you don't control them, they disappear with time, dust to dust. All time facets decompose in time one after the other until all is left is dust. So, for me, time is everything, it is everywhere, outside and inside you, it is the whole universe and the smallest particle, it knows and records everything, and that's quite an opposed view to the currently pushed belief saying time doesn't exist.

As for the initial chaotic formation, it may never be explainable perfectly, like asking why dust exists, or what it is, or where it comes from, I described my vision as exceptionally weak force currents but the question may be impossible to answer because there is something or there is nothing, you can't explain everything from nothing, nothing is nothing, so the absolute lowest you can go is starting from something. The way I see it is that you can't have neither nothing nor something, and since something is better than nothing, then something wins. Can you start from more basic than that? No you can't, and so it may not be possible to explain any better than that, but maybe it is possible, so why not exist to try? Whatever you aint got the intelligence to be anything else than everything and everywhere, the only place you're not is there (I'm developing political potential!) Then what? It's just another justification for existence. One possible function of existence would be to infiltrate accident, or unknown, or nothingness, where time is not. That way time can make its most fundamental functions true, be everything and everywhere, which may not be possible, and thus time may be changing functions, or opening the door to infinity of form when the impossibility will be deducted by life, another kind of intelligence is necessary, and a lot of time will fall at the mercy of that intelligence. Maybe we'll control some more fundamental time forms someday, like we do with computers, but for now we better leave that in the hands of our gods.

And if dust is too simplistic for you, remember that everything starts simple, like the 0 and 1 of our computers that opened a new dimension of possibilities so complex it surpasses one's life time capacity at understanding all its facets, and that's just a little beginning, just wait, that will be our first experience at experiencing the pain of the changes involved in such transformation of our vision.

Now don't try that in a laboratory, the universe external situation is totally different than the morphing that is inside the universe, like a galaxy, meaning that functions and knowledge bases are not the same, the fundamentals may be too "costly" or too big, or not necessary to transfer in a galaxy, so don't make a universe or grow knowledge or functions to prove something, it won't work or you'll prove nothings, all you can do for now is discover or use those functions transformed to time facets.

So, a function makes knowledge more functional, which in turn may give new functions and knowledge, add and mix and add and mix and you get a big "bundle" of knowledge associated to some levels of forces, to keep attached, to copy and to transfer (communicate) to create forms, and the whole needs to be fed from transformed external dust (can be seen as matter and antimatter) to move as structural matter forms. The knowledge becomes mass which is ready to be transformed in anything proportional to the complexity of existential mathematics, kind of, no science in that.

I know many people can't cope with this shit, what you must understand is the most basic function of everything; existence. If at some point you deduct that existence is better than inexistence, that doing something is more important than doing nothing or just being everywhere, then functions, mathematics, steps, etc, everything can start and it has no choice to if existence is the primary function. Once you memorize that you must exist, then your next function may be to protect that information, memory, you must exist to exist. Existence here may simply start at the meeting point of long lasting complex dust packets, where form becomes protected as a goal, form stays integral instead of disintegrating.

So, if you remember my earlier steps of life development, dust is transformed as matter by timing it, the timing of dust lead to functions, dust, time forms, mathematics, possibilities, matter, UI, galaxies, life, gods, the universes, creator species, us, ascended.

As for existence, there are many situations where it can be justified, many may have been cumulated as functions, and many views can coincide to a single one, 0, infinity, everywhere, nowhere, everything, nothing, etc. All you need is one of these things that is not "true" to justify existence, and a direct contrary notion may be immediately tried for no better results. And this can take any forms; you start by an infinite point tentative, 0, which may be the impossible success of "balls mathematic", then an infinite line tentative from new limitation functions, things like that, until you get the ultimate form; a self-explorer of infinite possibilities, and all the mathematics, principles functions of the forms, even the human time form, is memorized.

With an investment of matter to keep the memory existing, and a few adequate functions, you can develop many mathematical forms from the dust dimension, which in not necessarily something we can understand, instead of being a 2D, 3D or 4D, it is 6D LSD or worse because it can be infinite in its facets and grown and shrunk, thus controlling time facets can become possible by associating them through "balls mathematics" (ouch!), but you won't open my kind of doors with drugs, I'm clean, a prerequisite...but let's go; a ball would have its own dimension, or communication and transformation procedures or steps and uses and goals to permit the infinite possibilities dimension to be open for exploration. for a simplified view, see it as every variable of a function being made of a ball you can roll or change size with the result as form possibilities, the ball replace the + or – with at least a third dimension to mathematics while every given increment can be seen as a memory value too. But it's still just a view to make you understand that it is beyond human capacities to understand because there is at least one dimension you cannot see and that don't exist in the universe, or maybe, it's just weird. So, the creation of a universe meant for life implies that some existential dimensions external to the said universe are alien to the one living in the said universe.

What is possible as form if all possibilities exist? And how in hell do you know that? You can't know because you're nothing, just infinite mathematical possibilities that can take any form, what is the form that can englobe all possibilities? Who know what form to take? What to do?

It depends on many things, like the initial memory form may have had to develop an "absorbing" function to include the forms it meets in its mathematics, same forms gets eliminated, new forms are added. The "absorber" is a logic development too, a function that got a best form (a galaxy can be seen as that information absorber made to work inside the universe goals, but it is so evolved it creates better information and functions too, it learns and changes), the best form of absorption becomes the accumulation point, but you may still be in an environment of something which seems to include infinity notions, so what if you meet a form that flabbergast you? You got to be flabbergasting as much as possible too! You want the other to say "Wow! How did you do that?"

So you may want to develop the ultimate, impossible form that will act independently and adequately with everything, while doing the most beautiful things, and developing the greatest stories, live! Everything would be steps to create the most wonderful life intelligence able to do anything in its path of exploration, from microbes to animals to us to the galaxy, each "step" make life more capable; when we'll run about the galaxy in boringness and luxury, we'll be hit by a new facet of life developing, or an incoming wall, or a flabbergasting phenomenon that will make us feel wonderfully insignificant, and after so many steps, and tumblings too, we'll become capable of dealing with it.

But that is so far away in "time" that you'll feel like a tool witnessing your history for a long time, if it is worth it, while being thrown about in universe failures, your failures, but time formulae failures too. Anyway, if the time formulae got a goal, something it must have an idea of before developing life independence, then you'll be a learning for as long as that goal is not reached, if you want to see it like that, but I personally see it as the most extraordinary adventure; whatever I die, whatever the human form dies or gets replaced, if there is a bit of me to live in the UI, then it was worth it.

You can see things in a manner of efficiency too; it may not be worth it to make a universe for a single high consciousness form, it would be incompetent as a judgment base to choose the best path of things, to help the UI, but how to know? With tests. And each failure requires either a universe reset or reformulation, and so it may be possible that the first universe was very small and contained only one galaxy, or maybe even only one sun. In the end, the universe may end (or change) for any stupid reason, like attaining a life development goal, or gaining the knowledge of new possibilities or goals that would be a plus, or the discovery of a universal limitation to life.

The drive of everything must be exploring possibilities, developing them, curiosity, understanding how things work, finding the truth of things, the possible truths, developing good truth too, and adapting to these, making stories, changing, us, life, reality, everything by successfully going through thousands of steps of understanding from discoveries and learning.

Apart from that, one of the most basic view for existence permanence is a line. If you're blind and don't know what to do, you may try walking straight until you hit something, and the last thing you want to meet is your tail. So you start and learn counting (your steps), creating mathematics by trying to walk as straight as possible, and you know you're walking straight when you don't ever cross your traces again, and so, while doing so, you gain a lot of mathematics trying to walk straight. But the line may grow in size as it advances cumulating what make the 0 not true, decomposing mathematics as the line changes form, cumulating mathematics. There are a few variant like that. Another function, new accumulation of forms as mathematics, new forms, more functions.

And that applies to us too, as the universal mathematical formulae advances, there is nothing to tell that the physical laws we deduct and make mathematics from will not end-up too large or too small, the question is; what is infinity? Does the line reaches an end? Your infinity point seems straight like a line, you believe you got truth or stability and build from it, while far later, there was a variation that will crack and break everything after all, and when number crunching power is at an increasing rate, you got to keep up to date your line of infinity, and that may eventually become a problem with math and computers, in the far away future, but not worth thinking about for now. And, as I like to imagine problems, I'll say to be careful with mathematical deformity or instabilities, don't believe your mathematics too invincible, you may condemn you simplest formula all the way to your most complex from a 3.1416 mistake (joke), and god knows these are costly mistakes...

Probably the fundamental existence point is dependent from systemized (structured) "dust" to permit it to exist but limit its movement capacity, or its forms don't have the capacity to explore the unknown where straight line failed to go. Is dust infinite? The self-existence of the UI, or its reach, may be dependent from staying at a place, maybe it cannot explore unknown or understand it under this form. Yet, the mass of knowledge may have the power to move around its systematization or structuring by self-application of functions, then there is the repeat function, you can go far with that one, but it's risky, you wouldn't want a chain reaction of invalid forms to reveal your inadequacy, you are better be the fisherman than the fish, and you are better fishing than starving. You may still have a systemized exploitation of seemingly infinite dust permitting you to exist and move a little around. But you cannot move the knowledge efficiently, or at all, or through a small hole, you're dependent from your position, and your parts are dependent from the knowledge that is dependent from keeping its position, so you are condemned but cannot die because you don't have the knowledge to know if existence is dependent from you, that knowledge is in the unknown, or as unexplored possibilities within yourself. So with your knowledge and systematization you create new forces that will permit your knowledge to function as a whole and move about, exist, survive, prevent and react appropriately to anything.

You could say that the universe and life is made from extrapolated condemned forces of knowledge, or even a sacrifice of expended knowledge coming from other more basic phenomenon which grew knowledge differently than life would. It may be possible that most dust within basic mathematical form reach ended up systemized as memory, condemning the knowledge to disappear under this form, it needed to use what it had to change to a less "expensive" form, to become a more efficient knowledge form since the knowledge could continue to grow in complexity, from himself or unknown, but at some point there's no more "food" within your possibilities, so you need a form that will do that job, automatically at first if possible, by developing mathematical possibilities as forms, but as opportunities too, if the possibility is found since nothing is lost. The question is probably quantity, seen as unknown, and preservation too, can be seen as such.

It may be possible that most of the "food" is used to create and reach new paths, and as you do so you must memorize forever more and that becomes a reaching limitation, so you cannot develop any further because you need food. All other possibilities are developed except these, so you start morphing; you take dead ends of knowledge, or not useful stuff to develop these paths, it works to some extent but you end up with still undeveloped (not explored) paths, even after a big morphing, or you may be stuck with paths that may need the transfer or use of all the dust you have; you sacrifice memory while just keeping its reformulation procedures. But eventually, when all independent options have been explored you may end-up associating many functions at the best of your possibilities to permit displacement and more accumulation permitting more possibilities. But doing so may condemn some to most matter to a position, unless you invent a function to recuperate it later, for the birthing of the new associated form of knowledge, you don't know what form it will take, you just know you can give birth to it, so you do it as it will open new possibilities.

Now, I'll go back to my simpler 2D view of the line form, which is just one among many form to explore the possibilities of, but which is adequate to explain forces creations as memorized functions. You can try to go straight all you want but you may never meet something else than basic dust or developed dust no better than you, thus absorbing, and for second, you always come back unto yourself. If you draw a simple straight line from mathematics to infinity on a 2D plane where 0 don't exist, or don't want or must not exist or is removed, what happens? You come back to the same point, but inside the other line, and from that you can create forms and thus more mathematics and functions by changing the 0 value, then you may associate values to cumulated memory, dust, time, create actual morphing forms, experiencing pressures, collisions, forces, creating pure forms of these for new powers and forms. You got many things that can happen, and when you mix the possibilities you end-up with all kind of super forces interactions, invincible pressures, tremendous accidents too, and from new information and repetition you make different forms, functions, associated to limited mathematical facet, that you lunch from other function through steps functions, to reach a goal.

The steps to these goals may take any form, an explosion and a firework is a form transformation process, which may have started as more basic form interactions. You can get a simple view of the one forming the universe step from a relatively simple explosion formula arising from a set of function steps transforming dust as forms with different functions or under different forces, maybe contrary, but not necessarily matter anti-matter, or just it, particularly if you want a surface, which may have any number of uses, as much a container of laws as a protection from external influences. Reformulation may not be necessary at first, the formulae simply continue as steps advance, so our present universe may never have been reformulated even if I don't believe so.

So the universe may have appeared from a complex phenomenon to get matter and force forms ready for life, like concentrated super accelerated tremendously powerful techno lasers of all colors and forms as differently accelerated disco functions of matter start looking like all those spell effects we have in games. Forces created with boom boom mathematics and dust, some can be concentrated turning bubbles of brawn getting pushed together by an externally invested function, or by the lines interactions themselves, like alternative power, creating balls of forces.

You may have a hundred such functions transformed as form of matter that have been accelerated or retarded, or pressured, or twisted under other modification functions and from, all done by steps of increasing condemning powers, like reading a multi-dimensional DNA strand of mathematics giving all the different opened possibilities of exploration, until you end-up with the cell or life possibility condemned within the universal forces of creation.

In the end, tremendous amount of spiraled turbo speed dust settle as spinning matter islands seen as galaxies, while layered current of forces keep them under momentum, or even modify them with specific physical properties, and here is the universe which will take the appropriate form for knowledge...That was very un-scientific, not super serious, but that's another way things spin in my head, it's just that I wouldn't underestimate dance effects and colors if the UI is advanced... Just go 10 pages down if you want a more adequate view.

Many things can explain the spinning, but skipping that fundamental step is like developing a civilization without the wheel, and you can replace the wheel with science. I know science has a tendency to close doors to imagination and creativity spheres with "relative" mathematics' help (in my mind), but leave a crack for me, I could bring new vision stuff, and I need the possibility that you're making a mistake, no? Like looking for things at the wrong place, or deciding some physics as permanent which may not be depending on position within the universe. I'm sure there is a lot wrong mathematics, and people are too fond on extrapolating these to describe any phenomenon, and many scientists who like to boast believing in god is stupid are no better by believing on such mathematical extrapolations that are as doubtful as god, like the folding space time, the same for rewinding time, both proven possible thanks to extrapolated "simple" mathematics from Einstein. I know some will say I'm not an astrophysicist so I should shut-up, others who took all their intelligence to get educated on the subject and wouldn't dare being wrong will even say that their incapacity to argue means I'm wrong and understand nothing and they can't argue because I'm an asshole and I'm not an astrophysicist, and yes I know sweet nothing on the subject, and there is not much of a place for math and stats in my writing, but that won't prevent me from forming my own opinion particularly the way science acts in this reality. E=mc2 doesn't work except vaguely on some facet to me, so it is far from adequate to explain the universe. Far from me to say it is stupid, very useful for explosions and light effects, to some extent, but to me it is exactly like Darwin's view; an evident facet of a whole, a gross limited energy calculation from a "dead" mass of matter having a photon as a denominator of final transformation, and that's all there is to it. And the missing part of the formulae is not called antimatter, it is all the energies involved in the existence of the universe apart the E=mc2 facet. Or if you prefer, M is relative to many unknown variables, it cannot be calculated as "dead", and to make things worst C is simply relative. (At the extreme, antimatter, if it is truly how things started, cannot "disappear" even if it meets matter, and scientists say it themselves; antimatter meeting matter created the explosion; the next question is; what is the explosion then? It can't be nothing, so it is something, antimatter meeting matter don't disappear, it creates something else. If matter anti matter is that fundamental then the step below it may as well be strings of the simplest force. In fact, since I see things as strings of forces that bundle as balls when they meet their sexy equivalent, then what if those strings are long? If dust is bundled strings, then freeing them could create a severe expansion phenomenon, something in line with matter anti matter, just a thought.)

What I mean is that the universe is far more than the result of an explosion. I believe explaining the liberation of energy in the creation of the universe from that formula is wrong because you don't see forces as something, you think forces are magic nothing that hold everything together depending on their levels, but sorry for you, forces are everything and they can be massive, take two simple magnets for a stupid easy example, you'll see forces as mass, and these simple magnets could even destroy the theory of gravity, but maybe I'm going too far, maybe not.

Anyway, you're lucky I consider matter-antimatter as a sufficiently probable invention to use it, even if I don't see it as a final truth, there are other explosives out there...I should add that, while you're looking for palpable matter to fit your formulas, you are overlooking the possibility that everything is made of forces, all matter, so how can you boast that your formulas explain everything if you refuse to explore all possibilities? At the point where things are, science got so many holes, that any funky theory still got some possible credit, there is not even a need for a big bang, there is no need for antimatter there, it is not because a scientist made something like antimatter to exist for a millionth of a second that it proves the universe, it only proves something like anti-matter can be made to exist with incredible effort.

Physicists spend trillions to make everything fit, to fit their vision they needed antimatter so here it is (I'm not saying it doesn't exist, I'm just saying it's not because you can put a wedge in a hole that it's how things were designed, both the hole and the wedge may come from your mistake), and next they'll use a logic thing in the universe as a proof then implement it in every formulae as a proof that they're finding the absolute truth of the universe. Yes it fits, but maybe it fits because you needed it, because there was a hole in the theory and that was the simplest way to fill it, but what if antimatter actually is an invention they made in a laboratory, like a new molecule? Then the hole is still there. And I'm not saying I'm sure it is wrong, I'm giving it the high benefit of the doubt for a facet of the universe, but the truth could be so complex that all our view of the universe could be wrong, antimatter could be one of 20 factors involved in the creation of the universe, and even if we made a telescope as big as the earth and saw nothing else than a point or light in it, what of it? How does that proves everything? How do you want to start things anyway? You always start things by a point and that's what you'll see, it can be light, which becomes the universe, but is that a proof that all there is to it is matter and antimatter? Which somehow existed to create the situation? Antimatter is one possibility we developed in a laboratory.

And for those who still want to explain everything with the "god" of simplicity formulae, you should at least explain the most taboo subject of science, the simplest thing, the most evident fact that continually proves over and again the failing of both the E=MCdonald2 and the big bagn theories from the beginning. That evident and simple thing that should have been the first basis on which to build any theory about the universe, the thing hidden under tons of complexity and PMBBD, that schools or anybody never explained to me without babbling gravity inconsistencies and ambivalence; the simple fact that everything spins.

Yes sir, I never got a hint of an answer that made sense about that one, always thinking it was just me that was too dumb to understand things, Gravity? No, that's a manipulation to skip the taboo question since you are only answering from an evidently witnessed phenomenon, not explaining it; what is gravity anyways? Explain the phenomenon logically, and what is happening to make things spin, why it is the source and not the result? So there you have it people; the monster is free, now try answering my childish question while I tell you that the best your view of mass can do is change the speed, or attraction power, of an already spinning mass, supposing physicist are not all wrong about gravity...

So, what make everything spin? Antimatter? E=Mc2? I hope a formulae is not an argument! Why would a formula make everything spin? A formulae spring from deductions; what are these deductions? A physical fact like everything is spinning? A direction? Which you're able to put into numbers? It doesn't say why. Whatever we are in an invisible liquid made of magical particles or emptiness, it changes nothing to the fact that everything is spinning; things don't spin by themselves for the fun of it, an explosion of light doesn't spin unless there is something to cause it. But I'll give you that I didn't have time to go to school and learn how to make formulas from tons of formulas, something that I respect greatly, truly, Einstein was a great mathematician and those are forever too rare, but let's not exaggerate, I don't believe we'd be retarded if he didn't exist. And sorry if I'm less interested in his work, but I'll need to explain myself a spirituality about that spinning thing first, and you never underestimate the effect of a working spirituality on civilization...

So if I follow you well, you're telling me things spin because things spin, or things spin because they have momentum, no mystery in that. Well, it explains nothing, it's like explaining the spinning by describing it, you don't get someone like me with that, the wheels of a car don't spin because they have momentum, they spin because a motor transmits its force to them. So if you want to impress me, you'll have to tell me where is this magical motor making everything spin in the universe. And you won't tell me it is because of the big bang, the big bang doesn't make every atoms in the universe spin everywhere in the same way, sorry, forces? Yes, but forces are more like a transmission to me, the transmission of the motor...

For a theory of the universe to have a minimum of credibility to me, it must explain why everything spins (atoms, suns, planets, galaxies, etc) and you don't explain that by answering that they spin because something else spins. For now, the spinning is like a forgotten thing, nobody on this high tech planet ever noticed things spin except me...I say it is the big taboo of science because it invalidates almost all their invention concerning how the universe works. Why is everything spinning? Gravity? I don't believe so, probably gravity suffers from the syndrome of the mathematic formula that describe a phenomenon without explaining why, then it is used as a proof that things work like this and like that; psy science say people are like this and like that too you know...All is missing is video effects and words you can't understand then come to me credibility. Gravity doesn't make things spin, something make a certain property of matter spin is what I say. But that's beyond me, even if I can think of a few possibilities, like things falling always missing, or initial direction differential between matter and antimatter, and one other thing I forgot. It can be gotten if the initial matter of creation had a circle direction, maybe curved inward too, before taking an outward direction instead of a straight one. Among the most plausible explanation you have a form of intelligence that forces things to spin steadily, even if that's just from a system to provide the phenomenon automatically. Then there is the possibility that non emptiness is too big to interfere with a fundamental aspect of the spinning, and the force governing the spinning is disconnected from other forces, or still connected and driving an aspect of entropy. You could see it as the super weak initial forces going so fast that they form long strands, and as those strands bundle themselves together to create dust they spin with incredible momentum, and the only way to slow them down is to cumulate, interact, complexify.

And how about Einstein? You got to make him spin too! Let's see, you load 2 guns with a pellet of uranium, and fire them at each others so hard that they kind of intermix in the collision and the atoms break apart so hard that they break other atoms and so on. It's all linear, E=MC2 collision kind of style linear. My vision is not linear, things spin a lot around here, so the way I see it is that the explosion is not all there is to it. Let's see, you take 2 balls of matter and make them spin 100 000 times a second, what happens if you suddenly stop the spinning? The ball explodes? Wow, I just exploded Einstein's theory! Free explosion from spinning! I understand that modifying atomic formulation by forcing or colliding things together can result in a liberation of energy, but the result is still a reformulation of spinning, even the resulting energy release itself. What if all the energy in the universe are a decomposition or reformulation of the spinning itself? What if all what's holding every matter form together is a different form of spinning? And the transmission of this spinning is the force? Like gravity? But still no motor...I know that a collision result in an opposite reaction, that I see it as a force transfer, I know it is all understood by physics, but the spinning? (The force of belief, is being good at not believing a prerequisite to become good at believing?).

You can invent a few scenarios explaining the spinning, you can have a big bang implemented in your scenario, but maybe it is more like a re-sizing of the universe in a ball of fire to permit the injection of new dimensions, to permit the most successful life extrapolations to control new forces, or to readjust the universe.

I know I'm incompetent in that, maybe not as much as a politician, that's why I respect physicists and scientists and mathematicians, and programmers; I'm your general guy, a bit boosted, but I'll always need all kind of specialties spinning around me, so I surely won't say I understand everything. At least I'm interested in the subject, no? And I try to point at things that doesn't seems to make sense, and since I got no help, I developed the tools to explore deeper by myself, I'm interested, I care.

There are all kind of possible variations to my view of the universe, my view may be wrong, I don't know, but at least I started from the beginning and invented a situation that can justify some spinning in the first place; I explained 3 scenarios that could create the spinning. As for gravity, whatever its effects can be calculated and trusted for many things, I say it wrong too when extrapolated for everything. We should always be careful basing too much knowledge on calculations gained from witnessing an effect, we should know that witnessing, whatever you make formulas to describe it, is not a proof. I say that many extrapolated or reverse engineered mathematical formulas only work in an enclosed permanent environment, "in a bottle", and if you extrapolate them to the universe you end up with costly justifications.

We'll have to move between suns for a start at serious mathematics, we'll see if we can calculate precision of trust for such distances, you better have a guy behind the wheel to take over and control your computers full of formulas... Now, think about sending a satellite at a millimeter precision moving spot at the other end of the universe... Which is probably just an insignificant distance versus what is external to it. Everything moves, everything changes, there are not only variables that may change, the actual formulae too, many don't take into consideration very extended growth changes or modification phenomenons, and they forces us to make final deductions about what's possible of the universe and what is not. You can break a ball to a thousand bits and recreate it, no problem, but if I add a single particle, or modifies a force by an infinite percentage, everything may end up different at universe scale or vast time slabs. Now, I'm not discrediting mathematicians and physicist of the value of their work for sure, I'm just saying to not extrapolate to the whole universe too fast as a final truth.

I have no problems with mathematics if you don't prove the universe with a formulae, all kind of phenomenon can be observed and deducted with mathematics, but I don't want to be proven a final vision of things from extrapolated to infinity formulas like they're precise final things. I prefer to have an open mind to possibilities, not a limited final one in the name of feeling secure for a placebo effect, getting the whole world in line, then ending up having to battle messed-up people to get the irreversibly implanted stuff out of their mind after science finally say it was mistaken, again, in its final truth.

People are lost under such a pile of "facts" that they don't want to think seriously about things anymore, and that's dangerous, a good ground for charlatans and gurus profiteers, while people's judgment lose much of its value, and that's good for this reality that wants you to leave your judgment in the hands of manipulators and profiteers, just vote...Today, you just have to show a formulae and people abandon like it means truth.

If the universe is not as I prefer to see it, then let me be surprised a bit; when we'll know everything, the only thing left we'll have to do is dying, don't bring that moment too fast. And I'm very happy to have formulas and all kind of science, I want more, I just say not to use the universe too fast to make these invincible. For now, even precision mathematics to move safely within our solar system is a challenge, we have tons of difficult computing algorithms to create for the earth right now, I just hope you won't make too many mistakes, even at such a small scale...

And my complaining about our dealing with matter laws is a joke besides our truths about life. We may know a lot about matter and physics, but almost nothing about life, yet the way science throws about their truths about it without fear makes me feel they know everything about it, while in truth they're mainly just looking at decorticated facet of it while media people extrapolate to anything. And that makes the critical research of many excellent people mediocre. People almost watch scientists like they're a movie, they don't move people anymore with their discoveries because they've become Hollywood, a "super" "star" have more influence and value of opinion than them while everything human that exist, even our "super" "star", is made from researcher's involvements; it is more fundamental than governments, and it is better than them to trust for sure too... But it's still a reality thing; an ego scientist convincing the world that drinking petroleum is not toxic for your health is worse than a babbling government admiring country competition. E=MC2 is exactly one of those kind of "imbecile" formulas (in the sense that I'm too imbecile to make one, for susceptibilities...) I see it as one sided gross transformation of energy from photon size limited matter form, nothing more, too simple, even if I don't have the mind to go much past 3.1416 in math. It is a very approximate thing, very relative, it mainly mean a mass of something limited in facet can be calculated as energy. I say to make this formula true, just for the galaxy, you'd need to grow it in complexity a million times with tons of variables. For now it is extrapolated to the conclusion that everything started as an atomic explosion of energy, and that energy created the mass in the universe. It cannot be since the energy comes from somewhere, so it doesn't appear as it must grow, and since it must grow, it means it grows from something. And the answer is? Nothing; matter and anti-matter appeared then eliminated each other to explain the energy which comes back to exactly the same conclusion; energy just appeared, a flash from nothing. But isn't energy coming from mass which come from energy which come from mass to infinity? That's the same kind of thing as the god that come from where? Another god from another god to infinity; who is Allah?

To add insult to injury, I believe a lot of matter (dust forms) is recuperated outside mathematical possibilities from eye witness of laws which can only be deducted from non-relative matter or light, unless you catch it all in a black impenetrable laboratory, but it would probably be as hard to do as jailing Allah. This could mess everything, particularly with a bubble view, where some matter forms, maybe as big as light, may end up, even cumulate, on an inside surface, as a crust. I wonder what would happen with light in such a scenario? Maybe the bubble's inside would have a fiery look from some active reaction, like we're in a kind of sun, probably not, but that could look like big bang light...You can even think of that as something looking like a big bang step, if at some point there are pressure forces cumulating from transformation processes. Maybe gods would fit as the success of the first step of this, what we think as an E=mc2 big bang. And the bubble may expand or shrink when it "feels" like so, the bubble function changes back to a new size as a next step in life development, like a sun. And the bubble matter form may be held together by different force than what we know of.

You can invent all kind of scenarios, spend tons of money, to prove the theory work universally, make it a big bang where, just to make it fit, matter and anti-matter appear and collide and matter is a 1% thing (magic) that survived the explosion (?), then try to find a process where matter becomes anti-matter somewhere where it can't be. I say we can't see everything, and nothingness is nothingness, all kind of things can circulate in nothingness, but what slow down things in nothingness are forces or collisions.

As for E=mc2, it may be a simplified formula, but I won't say it is useless, oer is it? There are so many things that explain everything... What are the actual uses of E=mc2 anyways? Who is using E=mc2? What's the use of this? Stuff all brains with it? Make more general formulas? Calculate energy in a bottle? Ah! I know, calculating the energy within a Mc Donald!

Maybe I'm totally wrong, and I know scientists recently made a negative atom instead of a positive one, saying it was antimatter, like a proof of the big bang, but I say it proves nothing, only that you can, with tremendous effort, make things that rarely exist, like we've been doing with molecules for a long time, they just did it at an atomic scale with tremendous manipulation and efforts, and did this "antimatter" ended in inhalation by meeting its contrary? Or did it just stop existing by itself? You got the movie? And even if you could have created the situation that proves that antimatter can exist, or made a phenomenon that can qualify, it doesn't prove the universe started like that, even if it is a possibility. I guess they're stubbornly trying to get a trophy.

Furthermore, you can't always say a failure to visualize a senseless concept is a brain limitation; a senseless concept is hard to imagine, ok? It may work because you can manipulate to look like you understand something, but maybe it is all a lie to justify your failures in advance. So, there is no abstract big bang or universe, there is a big bang or there is not. There is no abstract stuff inside the universe or outside it, there are random parameters, there is matter, and it is inside something or it is not. You can't make of the big bang an absolute truth by defending it with abstractions. If you want to make the final truth affirmation that the big bang happened, you'll have to draw the process on a computer as forms without abstractions, and it will have to last like a truth; an "infinity" of time... If not, you are still in the domain of possibilities no more. You make the final truth affirmation that matter and antimatter suddenly existed to create the big bang? Then simulate how it got created so we can teach it at school all over the earth, drop the bullshit to cover the fact that you don't understand, like saying we can't visualize 4d while your powerful mind can. The big bang is not two things, the big bang is one thing, it happened under one form, and then you'll find something that could fit by looking in your telescope and declare you have proofs? You don't prove nothing with abstractions, the universe is not an abstraction, neither the big bang; the universe is something we can visualize, then draw it as truth, not as a partial form from an abstract piece of art! As soon as you talk about abstraction you fail. Maybe that's just me that prefers scenarios of possibilities, possibilities that can explain the spinning along the way are better, by the way...

It's like the quantum physics; is it proven or is it abstract bullshit? Then there are those wonderful particle accelerators, they always need to build another bigger one to prove something and explain everything, yes everything, repeated 2 times, nothing less! Tell me they will help our understanding of more fundamental things and I'll say go, tell me they'll explaining everything and I'll kick your ass, be specific, you can't explain why I fart with a particle accelerator. And if you want to go more fundamental than this, then you can't answer the most fundamental question; why everything spins, if those machines could explain the spinning we'd know about it, but maybe I should add that seeing something spinning is not an explanation of the why it spins, before you get out of your lab brandishing that everything spins because you witnessed a particle spinning...

The only thing you're proving is that you're always wrong since you always need a bigger one, which means you were mistaken in your particle view. If you know so much about particle behavior, then why didn't you build the ultimate one right at the start to prove you were right instead of building a series of always bigger ones? Each new particle accelerator proves you were wrong in your physics and your mathematics. Then you think I'll believe your formulas and universe view is right final truth because you can't make a bigger one no more? Or even the final one? From what do you base those formulas you're continually changing to make them fit? Maybe we should have other priorities for now, like helping the dying life, than giving those people billions of dollars, our life energy, building their energy hungry particle accelerators gadgets. And I don't say they are not useful, I say take a break or discover something useful; soon the only use for those things will be for some "scientists" to make money playing around all day long doing nothing except growing a beard of pseudo wisdom.

Sometimes I wonder if they are lying to people and to governments to get grants or keep their jobs. Maybe they are really discovering something important, like gravity doesn't work the way they think, but I'm not a fan of people hiding knowledge. You say your accelerators validate or invalidate Einstein or Darwin, or Newton or whatever if that's the case, and don't be happy when you're wrong, these things are expensive, and I need money. So limit your speech to the truth, don't tell me your gadget will explain everything, because there's some ammo for an answer to everything too; it's like asking a maniac of big guns who always want to be produced bigger ones, he'll answer "to have an answer to any problems!" But you know it is bullshit. I'm not against particle accelerators, but I say they far from explain everything, and once you're past a certain point they have no use in a reality time lapse, meaning the money is better used elsewhere for a while; will you lower poverty with your accelerator? No, a civilization has priorities, but I should say it's better to build a particle accelerator than to build the kit of industries for this military machine or that, or worst, to make an atomic bomb.

So yes, maybe I shouldn't complaint too much about this science facet when military science continually tries to make us believe we should thank them for almost half of human evolution so we better like them, I'm tired of hearing them boasting they made medicine evolve, and they "gave" us, civilians, all kind of technological advancements, it is all a load of PMBBD, we'd be far more advanced if we didn't spend on military technology, we'd have used the money to make technology far beyond what we currently have without taking the most inefficient detour; the "do it for killing first" detour, we'd even probably have a base in space. The truth is that they destroy life for a tremendous amount of life energy (means), they are the cause of an unbelievable humanity retard of development because they almost never fight for good reasons, only when there is a form of another of gain to be had. They're are a bunch of mercenaries paid by powerful people to spread or enforce their view, that's the truth of them, and their image campaigns don't work with me, sorry, the same for their emotive campaigns; fight for good, not for money or a job, or worst, a career, while making pub of how good you are and how we're lucky to ruin the world for the war machine. And don't think running about the world playing in other's things make you good, particularly if it is to implant your wonderful Democracy-Capitalism business.

To continue on a calmer path, I'll say that everything is a process, but existence cannot be calculated, even if existence as a goal can be calculated; you may want the human result, but you got to make it a process because it exists within limitations you must learn and take control of one by one. If you take a calculated Adam and eve dropped by god businessman, they'd die before touching the ground, unless they have fantastically evolved structures, more than what we have today, to help them.

The best we can do is manipulate the work of life at different level on different facets on its different forms, including ourselves. We can be anything if we somewhat follow the right and good way, and we must have the power to adapt to constantly changing limitations, not condemn ourselves to a precise selection that can fit profiting goals. Many of these limitations are imposed by life systems so we can reach their goals, so no we can't be what we want, we must look at limitations clues and deduct ourselves a path that will make life minimally satisfied. We can have an idea of that by observing life interaction between its forms, by seeing as far as we can in the future, cumulating knowledge, finding the reason behind things as there is always one, and that's how life knows perfection, and it's not only the physics of the universe, it's everywhere.

Everything and all life got a reason to exist even if some exist for the same reason, like many life-forms competing for a same function or spot, and life must have capable replacements in case one or the other die or disappear. A species that is continually harassed by sicknesses is a specie that is in conflict with its existence reasons, some is normal, steering or evolution oblige, but a purulence ground is another manner, it can even become a death risk for the species, particularly if a lot are gotten in relation to an attitude that can change.

Negative attitudes may be seen as a risk to life systems goals and they could react in all kind of diverse ways, choose one for your spirituality, no need for a punisher god, you are your own punisher as you are life, for which until now we have no much respect for; we deal with it in a profiting manner as much as we can. At the most basic level, life is about survival and exploration, but to explore you need to survive, and to survive you need to explore (and fight evil, entropy). We fight evil or we don't survive, and the biggest evil is bullshit, almost all the violence and killings on this planet have been made out of bullshit arguments. You can see evil as all what is an handicap to life's advancement or evolution, bullshit evidently, but systemized unfairness too (a human principle, nothing to do with life in general, I'm talking conscious vs unconscious logic, if it is unconscious logic that fairness is good (fairness is not equality btw, fairness is defined by logical principles) then you'll handicap your personal mind evolution and the one of others if you act like unfairness is good...) Then there is the unnecessary destruction of wild life and greenery, it doesn't mean not eating, or that no fragile specie is supposed to disappear, it mean if your survival and diversity is guaranteed as a priority, then you care for life more; you don't need to be trillions to justify your racist ego competition and your unfair countries delimitations defined by violence and bullshit...

Truth is a great quest, and it will make us shine or live shame, particularly if we are to come face to face with it. There may not be a day where all truth is revealed, but there may be a day where our truth is revealed. We should clean this mess of bullshit we're making, everyday it makes us smaller, whatever it will be painful to everybody, even those who had nothing to do with it. People could revolt! Yeah, the fears of liars, manipulators and profiteers who need you this way or that, but not with mind integrity. Revolt, pfff! We're at the genetic selection step; gremlins are happy to live fake lives, they even find intelligence in bullshit, and they're not worth shit. Who cares, denial, you better be a fitting block of hell to have the pretention to question their direction, like their favorite TV star, or the president they voted for, or the religion they believe in. And you bet they won't like the one who will pop their balloon, since they'll be left with nothing, just pain and deafness. At least they won't find someone to hate for it except themselves in after death...That's in part the price to pay if you can't take or have the truth, and the problem only grows the more you lie, you grow wrong judgment, wrong priorities, condemn reality to it, you accumulate the difficulty of living with it as you leave its bad effects as an heritage to future people. That's part of the test of life, how we deal with truth, to become the truth of ourselves. If we had all truth from the beginning religious style, there wouldn't be a reason for existence, as life develop new truths on the fly. The best you can do with unknown is to create a spirituality based on possibilities, not final truths. Possibilities that can always fly away with science, spirituality made of possibilities is the domain of the brave (or the truth seeker), spirituality made of final truth the one of the fearful (or the manipulator). One expands the mind, the other limits it.

Just be careful to not confound truth with knowledge; truth is specific aspect in a quest for knowledge which can be anything. You can dream all your life of opening the treasure of truth, make a big spirituality about it, all kind of scary stories, but it makes no sense if you are not to open it because you fear. Why would you fear? Me? It depends how it works, I wouldn't want to know everything, that's a power for the UI, and very different than asking for the truth. If it works by asking questions, or by revealing the truth of my attitude or my beliefs, or what I care about, then no problem, possibilities are possibilities, and while they may be wrong, they may still come to exist too. I can carry the weight of my own truth too, however painful, meaning I could show my own truth to everybody without asking the same from people, maybe not, there's masturbating in there, there's independence as a principle too, and love needs a nest without noses around... As for caring about things, that should not end-up as bad. That's exactly it in fact, I should get the truth that is of concerns to me, of that is of interest to me. But I'm not sure that works, there may not even be an answer to this. Maybe, if we involve spirituality; if we care about many things, if we open our minds to possibilities instead of final truths when we don't know an answer, if we are capable of independence of thinking and introspection, if we are not scared of being wrong because our attitude with knowledge doesn't make us liars, if we are capable of looking at the truth of ourselves, if we are capable of changing as much our attitude as our opinions, then we create the mind malleability to be able to deal with more aspects of the truth. In a sense we grow a baggage and expand our horizons for afterdeath, where we can go to the extent our imagination and philosophy brought us while living, free and adequate minds go farther.

So there shouldn't be a guaranteed treasure of truth as we live, except a satellite planted by aliens to record our history, but that would only be a facet of the truth, and manipulation potential would disqualify it, even if it's really the truth. The other aspect of this is that if we find a chest with "the secrets of life" engraved on it, then we are entitled to open it since it shouldn't exist. Finding I said, so it depends from where you got it, from the hands of gods or the UI? You don't touch unless they gave it to you, and you follow the conditions. Unpermitted interaction with things related to gods or the UI shouldn't be very much appreciated. If you found it in a grotto then ok, a kid could stumble upon it and open it...

What would you to do with the truth or the secrets of life anyways? Hide them? They were hidden in the first place, profit from them? No, but I wouldn't doubt a single moment they ends-up in the hands of a manipulator or profiteer in this reality... You tell them all whatever the troubles they will cause, because they are truths, they are the true, yes, the final truth, want me to repeat? They are the truth, and science goes toward reaching that goal, while life makes us learn for our mistakes relatively, "on the fly". But while science does its things, you can live in a rose elephant spirituality if you want, or a Santa Claus one, as long as you don't embark on a quest to make believe you've got the final truth because you won't be able to cope with the truth itself. What will "you" do with your pile of PMBBD if you stumble in on it the treasure of truth? You worked hard to make everybody believe in your psy science, destroyed and massacred a lot to impose your religion, you desecrated many minds and principles, you twisted history, and now you can't cope with the truth? Lies have always been better? All is left to you is still more evil and death? Because you know, it may be hard to live with the truth of your effects on life...

If one of the goals of the UI is to get help deciding and exploring from massive life judgment among the best associated differences who somewhat understand the how of life, its goals, and how to act, then for as long as true enough judgment association doesn't exist, the universe will stay somewhat under this form. If the quantity of good enough intelligence is insignificant, too wrong in its view, or doesn't pass some steps, everything will be reformulated, some exceptional results may be used or kept for whatever reasons the UI wants. I guess when there will be enough that are good enough an extraordinary thing will happen, like availability of some universal form of control, made available to those who will be able to explore possibilities without destroying themselves or destroying mathematics or erasing history, things like that. Got to be careful playing with bigger than yourself, or playing with 36 trillion watts power lines, you don't want to short out the whole life thing. The first gift you get in life is surely not a chainsaw or a gun, and no gift if Santa Claus is not happy. But there is no reason, if we got that much knowledge and abilities not to end up controlling some greater powers, like finally succeeding at doing fusion in an energy efficient manner...finally...then it will be us that will create more directed explorations by playing fine with fantastically powerful forces, shooting super boomerangs of life, directing life toward unknown.

In a trillion years, after we've played with most time forms, we may end up levitating as a new truth, well, maybe not, would it be worth it anyways? You'd have to develop an impossible modifier, with all its interactions, from scratch, and such work would involve universal time slabs, some kind of patience and sustainability! And what kind of size of a brain will you need? I'm just saying stupidities, levitation would be almost like fitting all the universal and life principles in truth in one's brain, you're better levitating more comfortably in machines, walking eating and discussing things while flying is a lot better than levitating in the wind, and you don't want to fall off your levitation under the weight of your head inflation. And what would you do with people flying everywhere, how would you systemize traffic? And how would you prevent accidents? Bloody and messy accidents...but we'd have security equipment! Yes, as polluting as a whole than a car...So people got legs to walk on the ground for a start, whatever a certain guy is rumored to have done such things, besides, you don't want people doing stupid things in orbit or on the moon, machines is the way, thanks to my deductive ability. What I mean by all that is that truth can be relative from one form to the other, and the mind can't develop all truths as modifiers, particularly since they can take millions of years to develop; things like us, dependent from PMBBD, with our priorities, judgment and conflicting languages, we'll have time to die many time before seeing a hint of a newly created ability.

As for the universe, we can't predict what it will do because we don't know what's the plan of possibilities it is advancing in, except that it will involve life. Since it will "always" include intelligence manipulating the matter, the form or process will always include that life thrives. Furthermore, if the form matter took is under many such primary functions like taking the necessary form to explore a maximum of possibilities, it may be possible that life is meant to become the intelligence controlling galaxies in absolutely all their functions, and galactic life may be under many possible scenarios.

I explained a few possibilities of fundamental functions that could lead to the life justification in the "Life infinite" chapter; another such thing would be "infinity". What is infinite? You found something infinite? Prove it! Easy for humans to think infinite while your little struggle last 100 years, but if in one picoseconds you could count to 20 trillion, what would infinity mean to you? So, surely there are functions related to infinity, or its contrary meaning; if infinity is not deducted, then all the mathematics change to be based on limitations.

It's another way existence gains a meaning, a value, where protecting the memory of the positive value of existence from limitations becomes a function. Next, if infinity is not deduced then it becomes a "maybe", and a maybe can't exist as truth in pure mathematics, so existence is associated to that function, "what is maybe", eliminate "maybe" because it can't exist. Since the notion of 0 mathematics is eliminated by the "maybe", exploit "near" 0 mathematics to eliminate "maybe". Then from now on, you're in a growth scenario of exploration of possibilities and the goal would be infinity, but infinity is worthless as an end result because it answers the existential question and sets things back to dust. You can't answer the stupid question anyways since you can't deduct an end or quantity to infinity, so you're stuck inventing your own infinite imprecision mathematics made of finite limitations because 0 does not exist in your environment, except to quantify inexistence, which should not exist, thus on-off existence from the fact that, well, infinity exists, if infinity exists then 0 does not exist and our mathematics are meant to describe the limits of an environment, which in turn would mean the universe is enclosed. Ah!

Anyway, in the end, you must take a form that will make best use of dust to test things. I guess you must see dust as finite in infinity of space, a dust by many kilometers of space, or clouds of it, all kind of accumulations of different forms laying, where? Somewhere around random, and what if you hit a vastness without any? That your arms, or line time form, or measuring tape, cannot reach the extent of? Some powerful mathematical form beyond your possibilities to cope with did it? So you must see dust as an exploitation one way or the other because it permits everything, but how to gather it massively, isn't dust forces in my vision? How to reap in the force? And under what form can a force be stashed? I would say a growing bubble would be the ideal gathering mechanism, and matter-anti matter would stash well, it's like what I already explained in "Life Infinite" about existence taking the form of forces like air currents that will become round only if they meet an opposed force, at that point they would orbit each other, becoming tangible matter under the form of dust. Just don't forget everything is forces, matter doesn't exist, I just use the term to describe forces that developed in a way that they can't go through each other unless some pressure event cause them to, and the result is more likely a reformulation of the forces (matters) involved. So matter and antimatter may possibly fit the description of fundamental forces that can be stashed, by the UI, not scientists...but I'd have a tendency to believe they are still a transformation of a single type of stuff, antimatter may be used specifically as the explosive of the UI, it's just that at the size extremes we're dealing with here, and the time disproportions involved, the explosion may look like a slow transformation process to the "infinite" FPS eye of UI, and since its automated life developing formulae will start as little as possible and as soon as possible, then the formulae may as well be carried by an explosion.

It would all be a vast investment to create intelligence that will deal with the dust, opening more possibilities, because the UI easily came to the conclusion that something like itself would be using dust to do things too, so taking as much as you can and using it in its best fashion become supreme functions. Probably the best way to get and preserve the dust is with the bubble form; matter projection may do the job, see it as the surface of the bubble that would be a tool to get dust from an environment full of random developments of it, adding that matter to the surface thus self-sustaining the process until some point. There is the possibility that our universe may be doing this phenomenon, while galaxies reaps in the dust (matter) becoming bigger while life is developed, all meant to come back with the best life extrapolations left behind waiting for the next explosion, which may get displaced somewhere else by the UI, while gods follow...Maybe not, but the more dust and intelligence the UI gets, the more capacities life gets whatever the way the universe plan develops.

In this scenario, things would have started small, and each explosion would be a reformulation of matter by the intrinsic of it, 2% invested 98% wasted, the 2% would be "coded" or "set-up" to develop the complexities of matter and life, like little bubbles spinning within the matter that would eventually become seeds for the most beautiful flowers. At first there is only one, like 0.01% matter 99.99% antimatter, you get a small explosion with a single solar system with a cell, the UI memorizes the cell when the matter comes back with an accumulation, now you have 0.10% matter 99.90% antimatter, enough for a bigger explosion, a few suns and a more complex seed, do that tons of times and you get galaxies with animals, continue on and you get galaxies with high consciousness. At 50% 50% there are so many galaxies that the UI don't know what to do with them for no better result in life developments, and it doesn't want to have an explosion from another developing UI to scrap its work, so it takes a different form, like the spiritual universe, systemize 50% of the matter for itself, make a half size explosion within the rest and you have galaxies flying away within what looks like nothingness or infinity to us, but we're just free flying in a previously exploited expanse seen as a bubble. The UI still got tons of matter (force, energy) to do all kind of weird things with life inside the bubble. We could be at that step, and galaxies could still be on a momentum from the explosion, but this time when they'll come back together the UI will use the ton of force it cumulated to keep them in suspension, and we'll travel more easily between each other, just to say that at that that step anything can happen, the UI with that much power can do anything, if life systems don't exist totally as I see them, they could get created from my mind (not anybody's mind...Particularly if it's geared toward profiting from my work...), the universe could be reformulated as a flat square if the UI deducts it has no use for the whole explosive universe thing at that step and scientists will be like WTF! Or it could create a few smaller almost independent universes not far from itself, like a love story or kids or something.

Even now I wouldn't be so sure of the way galaxies will behave in the future, we may seems to be going lose, looking for treasure when all of a sudden it's call back time and all the galaxies come back before their forces lose strength. Worthy galaxies could eventually go somewhere, carrying far more value than they started with, they could even move from directional cues, a time form may take form to suck, feed, read or steer galaxies from their black holes, or we may be forced to go straight on without intergalactic communication and once the universe reaches a certain point, whatever that is, development or knowledge, we fall off directional cues to go somewhere as an incredibly far more powerful life intelligence than the initial form; we would finally find out what permit those gods to levitate, like the use of a force necessary to control time transformations, or whatever else function limiting our independence, forcing us to seek it. Then take a decision there, where independence may be an option if it is within our possibilities, which would probably be the case since our level of knowledge and understanding would be unbelievable, if that possibility exist within the current universe plan, but maybe we are meant to end-up as vessels too, or on a surface, or leaving the universe altogether.

Now, whatever the scenario or not, dust under form, which I already explained as a time form, is supposed to logically decompose unless there in a process that will permit a sustained application of force; if form decompose to dust, time is lost, and memory too. The previous scenario is related to an expansion phenomenon, but there may be many uses to such a process, and don't think that if things can be made to coincide the UI didn't think about it; there should be a complex priority tree concerning the energy use function... Even the matter of the universe will be recuperated for another step that will give new uses to it while the best intelligences survive the process.

I know I talk crazy a lot, and you're not done with my imagination. For now you'll have to know if your computer screen is actually growing along with your measuring tape and yourself before making final affirmation about expansion. Personally, I wouldn't think much of it if I didn't have to write about it; I see it as a step, or as change, or evolution, we may expand and panic while drawing formulas everywhere like geniuses always do in movies, and calling it the era of the Sagittarius, like some grand guru saw it written in the stars, then we may shrink and panic again doing the same, making movies proving we'll all die imploded while calling it the era of the Virgo, then we may accelerate and panic again, etc.

There are many ways to explain an expansion process if you want one, external as well as internal, but one thing's for sure, it got a goal that makes sense and it concerns life. And since I believe the universe is created from intelligence, its future can't be predicted final like science likes so much to do. As an always crazy possibility, and doubtful since the expansion may be limited to a facet of time, everything may try to go back to dust particles for an optimizing process if there is a limited quantity. Life could develop very costly on matter; and some forms would eventually gain the knowledge and means to stop the expansion process for an "island" of themselves as a step (test), whatever the size or form that "island" can take, some very high tech thing? A super planet? A solar system? A galaxy? and that would permit life to preserve itself while the dust is recuperated back to universal intelligence, then a new step take place, whatever that is.

As for systemized time stashes, some forms could be optimized and kept as a movie of the story for the transferred life developments to play with; don't forget that in my view there may have been many universal reformulations to come to the current state of things, and a logical universal function would be to keep a memory of that process; the whole matter in the universe would be going through a decomposition and filtering process concerning solely life development. Even planets could systemize their experience with life as a memory stash, like a string of their life experience, or parchment, or a wool ball would be a better vision, under coded matter form. Some lose it all, but most end-up in a black hole where it could be arranged under another form or transferred somewhere else while the rest is dusted.

Black holes could be far more complex than what we think of, in fact, everything could be far more complex than science currently makes us believe, I see matter as composed of information levels, I see everything as communicating with different matter levels, even our mind would be under processes of information transformations, a form of reincarnation could really exist, and black holes? Well life interaction with matter data could be processed, planetary to some level, shipped to the sun through magnetic fields for another processing level, then ultimately shipped to black holes which would be another matter and data processing tool, then shipped to the UI, that way, you can rework the universe to better advance life. All that is within a system that doesn't take into consideration that the UI doesn't use its own matter to memorize things through another strange and rare phenomenon in the universe.

As I previously explained, the process of entropy is what I see as mainly driving time forward, even if the UI can handicap the notion in the name of keeping stability, but this could be intrinsic to the universe too; entropy is a complex process. Probably that most of the process is continually recycled, the whole galaxy can be seen as a recycler of entropy, and the ultimate form of it is life that can do the same kind of job as the UI, using matter (forces) to preserve integrity, or to reduce entropy.

What if dust got no speed or random speed and modifying the function of it, like making atoms out of it, gives it a direction and speed proportional to something? As soon as time stops being time, it becomes dust (super weak strings of forces at the limit...). Time would be anything related to the universe in relation to a matter decomposition process, and since it is the result of an intelligence process, I don't see why things wouldn't be arranged to know and preserve the weight of valuable knowledge from life's experience. Evidently, it would be imprinted as matter somewhere. So a time speed variable could exist and be used to know the life level of a galaxy, it may be possible that as soon as certain life systems interact with matter, a deep level of it tags that matter as imprinted by life, in all its relations, and then you can filter it out and categories it, or read it and stash it in a more efficient manner to free the matter. It would be done as soon as that matter enters in contact with a living (matter transformation) body like a planet, and since a rock contains only redundant information, almost all life is already in contact with a planet, so the information is transferred live.

You understand that there are a few possibilities about time here, one is simple entropy, the other is a memorizing process, both could be true. The memorizing process that would require time to take a permanent form, should as much result in a life memory for life, as a book for the UI to read. The latter is the funky and unlikely option, because there is always something like quantum mechanics to eliminate the matter transfer phenomenon. Still, it could be possible that one factor in time advancement speed could be dependent on the quantity of material used in the "non ego" memorizing process, if you remember my ego view. So, if 10% of the matter is currently used as memory, then you would subtract 10% from the total of matter in the galaxy, and thus time or even the galaxy would go faster, depending on what strategy is used by the universe to recuperate the information, that is, if dust quantity is stable (supposing galaxies don't accumulate matter as they advance...). If you prefer, the information must be transformed to useful form as the galaxy travels, for efficiency. I don't think planets can do that, they got enough of birthing life, but maybe suns or black hole could do the job, maybe the earth information is circulated as a force, like a magnetic field, transmitted to the sun, transmitted to the black hole or another nearby sun. All counted as a mass of information modifying the speed of time.

If you remember how I see life imprinting matter; a rock in the blackness of our galaxy is not devoid of life, if only under the form of separated molecules forming the building blocks of life, so it is ready to develop it further if it meets adequate conditions. And when it meets a certain situation, maybe a massive black hole could fit the description, or a sun too, its mass of life is removed, added to a core of information or discarded if the information already exist, the rest dusted. But that's a bit complicated versus the capacities of the UI, yet, there are uses for such a process for life itself, if we are to take into consideration that life should be meant to gain the same information as the UI, while keeping the UI from getting corrupt by life. It would mean that at some point in a billion years, if we survive that long, when we'll have super hot tech to laugh at the event horizon of black holes, we could be rewarded with the true story of life in our galaxy, without needing to die for it.

That brings me to what are the limitation which dictate a content of matter (dust). Are galaxies independent self propelled things or are they given a "kick" and a "spin"? Probably both; they start from simple aggregation of matter and when enough is cumulated, a step takes place where a new matter form (force form) appears along with forces that don't take matter form. Some of these could get locked to UI forces, like the needle of a compass, but I'm pushing a little saying that galaxies could be influenced by phenomenon within the spiritual universe or by the UI itself. However, what can't the UI do? Does craziness exists for it? No, and I prefer to live in a world of possibilities and anguish, than to limit my mind to fearful comfort to displace my soul for exploitation. The strange thing is, I absolutely like to jungle with my incertitude, if only this reality was not such a piece of shit... So I wouldn't doubt a single moment that the UI could need to manipulate whole galaxies if it takes a liking of the life developing in it, or the inverse could be a justification too, hate is as important as love, when our good politicians will finally have their subjugated innocent population that is lawfully and genetically handicapped to live hate based emotions, then we'll get it from the UI, or some aliens will debark to enslave us, and our armaments that we built out of fear will mean nothing, just a shield to remove and reveal the little fearful human that can't live with its own truth and see possibilities as something to be competed for a limited schema of security. The UI may need to influence galaxies in part to modify life properties too, which is beyond the power of the life god and gods.

So In that scenario, the base of existence for galaxies starts small, then they grow gigantic in a fantastic accumulation of matter at they travel, but as they do, life spread and take memory form, thus slowing entropy and time.

In the process of decomposing everything back to dust, the matter could be used to move the galaxy too. In the scenario where the universe is contained, then galaxies may be meant to provide the "gas" for life to reach a next step, which can take many forms. Galaxies, including life, may spend most of their "gas" for that, and species that don't control their ego or that are not patient, or try any senseless experiment wasting galactic proprieties or too much matter, all those may end-up in a "dead memory" galaxy. But don't confound that with a natural process you can't affect, a step of galactic life may be exactly that, the transformation of galaxies as different forms of energy high consciousness life is supposed to be able to adapt to.

All these possibilities are complicated, some a little crazy, but I'm not scared of that, I'm open to any possibilities; you think you'll overload me with that? The ones that will go nuts when they'll be in the face of the truth are those that believed too strongly in a final truth or a limited view of things, or worse, blatant lies. Protecting people from the truth, even possibilities, is no good philosophy.

Life systems themselves may not presently know their own future paths, and their human form neither, and the island principle may apply at many levels complicating everything. I personally believe there is a galactic process that can lead to the creation of a mother earth anywhere the environment is right, and it may very rarely succeed at transmitting, reproducing, its success through a high consciousness form, to other planets. As for the life god there may be one by galaxy that is impossible to kill as it "jumps" from place to place, you never know. Beyond that, at some point, the way of things will force an association process.

Now, there is no way to know when any step happens, or if we are still at a step where the universe is prone to reformulation. I believe the most extraordinary reformulations are to come, but such an event will only take place in billions of years...For now life is experimented on islands until the most efficient formulae of multi successful high consciousness life capable of working in harmony is found; even the life in our galaxy may go through many different forms before reaching a final "island" point in that scenario.

As for the forms life may transform or reproduce itself as, it may be dependent from many factors, knowledge, us, accidents, galactic steps etc. As an example, what if a lot of matter was added to the earth before stabilizing it? Life may change form, lose or gain new powers. And what about a precise matter at it? Or an added atmospheric layer? What about new moons? You wouldn't dare do that, unless you experiment things elsewhere, as you'd risk killing it as much as changing it, and the first to go would be surface life, yet, aren't we doing it right now in our ego competition power-trip?

We will never know the price this insanity imposed to humanity, even life itself. We don't know where we are, we compete life, we think elements are in a war against each other because we don't understand a minimum about life and godhood superiority make us see everything as competition and battle, but everything is interrelated, associated and working together for our existence, the whole solar system exist for us, everything is waiting for us, the effort developed by life for us is extraordinary and easy to see, but we are blinded by "super" "stars".

Life may be working all its strength throughout the whole solar system to help us and we only dream of division, competing it and destroying it while having fun at it, dreaming of flushing it there, we are just killing the one most extraordinary thing in the name of ego gods, because of our evil attitudes. We never know at which point life is, it may be on the verge of dying, needing our understanding to reach another step, but its worst failure would be that we passed our time doing party and jobbing to satisfy human "gods" while never understanding it.

Now, there seem to be a lot of critical processes going on here; we may still be at the beginning of galaxies morphing processes, and thus under many unknown processes. As for galaxies flying either independently or from momentum, I prefer independently, which would means we could direct galaxies but it would imply at least two things; that we can eventually steer and communicate between galaxies and not the least, that we eventually get some kind of universal form of powers, but maybe we only need to understand the galaxy very well for that.

Both dependence and independence develop to all kind of possibilities and questions. Can galaxies communicate between each other? Which distance? Are intergalactic vessels possible? It is a communication form, but maybe interstellar is already enough of an achievement at galaxy scale. Can galaxies advance by themselves? Do they gain or lose something as they advance? They are advancing in what? And if we are cumulating something, then the galaxy is under more than life developments morphing. What if it gains something permitting it to grow, change?

I said that because I thought of levitation, which involves that you slow down and somewhat control time, since slowing down mean slowing time. I wouldn't be surprised if galaxies were reaping and transforming a form of matter as they travel. Some form of already transformed matter gets attracted by some other unseen force, like magnetic fields, and different nuclear reactions, either in suns, planets and black holes, pass it through the appropriate filtering, arrangement and transformation process best adapted to the situation the gravity using body personally develop in its step process. Since everything is under a matter transformation process, what happens to the matter as it travels the galaxy? How is it imprinted by life when it happens? In would guess it recycled, some interesting parts kept, the rest transformed for new "destiny". Galaxies as matter recycling engines makes sense, don't forget everything is supposed to be automatic, so entropy within the universe must be limited to minimize the input from the UI, or you can simply see it as the best energy formulae versus the goal of creating life diversity, and diversity should require quite a lot of complexity and energy.

Life may be somewhat the same from one galaxy to the other, but I don't think so, a universe full of humans? Not interested. Maybe some "superior" races in racial competition would like the idea though, a universe full of British? I'd prefer some diversity, maybe each galaxy is meant as a try at a high consciousness form, a few by galaxy would be logical, at places of appropriate challenge, or test. And you don't need gods interventions, even if I prefer them to exist, that way I could feel better than them at things, or acquiesce that they did some dirty job I'll eventually understand and be thankful for...

So, to get the desired effect of a few high consciousnesses by galaxy, you only need to arrange the time forms for rarity, or, if you prefer, make it a pressure that can only happen to exist in such or that limited difficult situation as a test, which is galactic variables dependent. That pressure can be seen as galaxies producing their best, rarely succeeding. In a million stars, you may get a few stars that will produce life which will be capable of traveling around, and those may not be seen as the best, they may be evil, or incompetent, they may even scrap their whole galaxy in an experiment, who knows, so you may have the same kind of ratio of success at a universe scale, a few galaxies, maybe a million, will carry relatively good enough intelligence development, as for being the best, that may only apply to a few thousands.

As I already said, if life systems wanted they wouldn't need you to eat the planet, even everything, no existence. The galaxy as a step is a limitation, life must learn it before having more powers, steps of power, and someday life may have the power to modify fundamental forces, it may have to experiment extraordinary things to develop new possibilities or remove a limitation, and it will always be scared of doing it, so it will need very evolved senses and forms striving for truth, and it will feel still more secure or will do less devastating mistakes if one of its step is to work in association with many forms, the best.

This philosophy is kind of the contrary philosophy we have today with the ego-gods ideology, which would lead a single race, the English, to eventually possess the universe through competition, and it would fail it totally, eliminating all life memory from a frustration or lack of judgment; if you put the power to end thing in a single lifeform, they'll eventually do it one way or the other is my belief, by their self-created or cumulated limitations and dependences, they may lack the patience to slowly morph, take a shortcut or risks, maybe many times, until one day your worst fear happens.

You understand that principle? Patience, doing things for the best you can win big. But here we do things on a panic if profits are spotted, and it is too late to systemize things differently because entertainment and inflating egos is more of a civilization priority than survival or doing things for good reasons. We even send clowns in space these days so much we're ridiculous, and we believe our judgment is supreme, that we're gods, but we're a joke, or maybe an insult. And we'd want the universe in our hands so much we believe ourselves good and following the best path of thing with our Democracy Capitalism business. In fact, an ego reality made invincible may be a step to eliminate ego people from life manipulations, it should be a selection that fails, and probably everything is played by those that can get rid of the style. One thing's for sure, I'd never put universal powers in the hands of the peoples that are controlling the means or that are the most admired on this planet.

So I believe it is logical that we are not the only such form, because of exactly this reason; not enough judgment possibilities and capabilities, not enough form which change judgment tremendously, and that's a reason why we must invent a system where people have a direct personal judgment effect on any decision that concerns them. And you must always think in the optic that a decision must be taken before a too late happens. A single form will lack such judgment, particularly if it's indoctrinated within an unfair system, like for the present human civilization. And I believe it is very near too late for us, we are losing potential, but are we sensing it through all the PMBBD? And how do we act in troubled times with our great judgment limited to bosses instead of everybody? In all kind of wrong ways because the system is a controlled anarchy of profiteers, a competition to profit as much as possible from anything, from innocence in big pare at it, to get as much means as possible for some and to hell with fairness, while they don't take the responsibility proportional to the means they control; even the ones imposing a semblant of fairness and order do it for profiting too while using tons of PMBBD on masses, they just profit from a different facet. Finally, you will never tell me you have an adequate judgment activity in this competition where means give an unfair advantage to an argument.

When things are crapping it out, or when hell is successful, or when evil is seen as good, or when good principles serve evil, or when unfairness is systematized eternal, then it means we didn't decide well or took the best decision, the deciding system is a failure, or maybe seen as not interesting so much people's judgment is feeling worthless, or they like it because they are made to not really want to decide things concerning them, they are unconsciously indoctrinated, they want a "god" to tell them what to do, all they want is to vote for which, as they work hard for as a semblant of consciousness, a semblant of doing some good.

The joke here is that the means exist, but the means connection is wrong, in judgment, and uses. But yes I'll give you that we have been able to hold things together until now, it is an extraordinary feat at this point, but what counts is the next part, taking a glorious step in power, but not everybody passes, as civilization and as people, and that means troubles for sure. Are we capable? I doubt we'll even reach the step, we'll be flat on our stomach, touching it before dying in the worst life tragedies that will all blow in our face from the weight of the lies we stuffed our history with, the entertainment dependence in hype we created, the ego people we admire and give the world to, and far more for sure. Our galaxy may be wasted since it may take a million suns to get a good enough high consciousness form that will be capable of traveling the stars, or if we are very lucky, another high consciousness specie may try, a friend we'll never meet which will cry on our tragedy, if we are lucky...

And scientists are so top hot they say life is invincible on the planet, they can play with it, resources too are infinite! But if you die like a moron by yourself exploiting life on ego overdrive, then what's the worth? You think infinity is yours? Invincibility is yours? But we aint got the fantastic means necessary to learn humility and stop filling people with contradicting or not logical knowledge. We believe the earth, life and resources are infinite for our competitive playing fun while we are causing loads of problems with such attitudes of infinity and liberty and final truths that we never end PMBBD people with, even when we know we're often all wrong. What we don't understand is that everything is a whole, no need for life if it can't develop high consciousness that can travel the stars, and that is extremely rare and requires a fantastic multi coincided strikes of luck to happen in the galaxy. It will be a little life planet without dreams, wasted, thanks to our ego attitude of believing it is invincible, that we're "gods" doing their best.

And don't tell me scientists don't think life is invincible and resources are infinite, I heard them make the affirmation a few times while moralizing inferiors that whatever we die, life will grow back and thrive again on earth which is a PMBBD lie; life without the high consciousness form is worthless, if we exploit everything in our ego power-trip and die, how will another species build a civilization to reach other stars? We'll have condemned it to earth too, and resources renewing take millions of years, so even if another one arose within that time, it would just survive some time from residual resources while hating our failure. In the end, you'll be better colliding the earth with another body like a moon for another chance...

I believe the universe may end-up containing a few thousand successful high consciousness species with an acceptable view of things and way of living (my way of seeing life is made of possibilities, not final truths, so it may have deficient or wrong parts, and some facets will take a millions of years to be relatively proven by science), other species may not only have a somewhat different view of life, but their truths may be different too, conflicting with our truths while still being true to them.

We would end-up as associated and working together powerful independent different intelligence form grown from an original diversity potential, like every species wants its fair universe of exploring different possibilities, but all are able to communicate through a global dimension, and judge, decide and act together for big massive universal fun of finding what the hell is going on, what are the limitations to possibilities.

And that can go far, what if at some accumulation point of systemized memory can creates more new unknown forces or functions? A supplementary dimension making all life inappropriate under this form if the dimension is created because it is a logical step? Something we have to do to open unexplored possibilities? And what will be the form of that? It is high consciousness species that will have to work out a transition of life intelligence and memory and new abilities to it, make the new functions and transfer to new life and intelligence, and for that you only need one lifeform with an imagination well defined as possibilities satisfying the UI. What if competition is inadequate or a step? You need life to know and find a solution. But what if the solution worsen an already low chance at life survival? How will you increase association? You'll need a brain that understands enough interrelations, then the information will eventually reach the UI and it may deduct how to add or modify a dimension in the universe. You wouldn't try that profound a change to explore new possibilities? Life always have limited dimensional creation ability, there are dimensions that reacts and changes to us too, with our existence in the balance, or at risk if we do a stupid thing, thus the necessity for massive association of good judgment, at the specie level diversity, and in a lot of instance, at the judgment of many associated high consciousness species.

And if you want to fit gods in the story, then all that process may have existed for them, they may have been useful to the UI and their reward is "eternal" survival, and as long as they don't interfere like show-offs they can advance life work. In a sense they met a problem that their limited form could not go over, or they met a universal limitation, or dimensional failure, and the universe had to reformulate itself to permit a more adequate time formulae, they were preserved, or they found a way to preserve themselves, and now they accelerate the new formulation of life intelligence. Probably they understood a problem come from the limited possibilities of their intelligence that couldn't adapt and change anymore past a certain point, maybe a mental ideological failure by wrong selection, or a reproduction dysfunction, or a vast memory failure, maybe even a total memory ablation from playing with fundamental time form values, or they may have zapped off all life memory, or created a universal degradation, who knows? They lacked judgment somewhere critical is my guess.

Maybe a bunch of problems have arisen from eternal life causes, and the universe had to be reformulated to include minimal life fairness principles in the form of a limited lifespan to force life to have a truer view, better judgment and better goals; maybe nothing better than unfair eternal life existed at some previous universal form, and that lead to a forced death dimension to the universe.

Even sexual attitudes, like the love anything philosophy, can become a condemning limitation, or superiority-inferiority attitude, unfairness systematizations. Other forms may be developing from more grounded life principles which will survive where ego people can't, uncontrolled ego may be seen as an ultimate problem if it is the cause of universal failures a few times, it may be transformed to an enemy lesson, what defines evil (worst way), the failure of good judgment, failure to explore and choose evident good or best possibilities leading to survival and life reproduction stability, like not equilibrated reproduction leading to one sex overwhelming the other, or developing bizarre ways of raising beings, any sexual activity philosophy is a critical factor, but happiness failure of the specie is a reflection of a poor systematization of judgment too, there are many examples of failure to follow the best path.

Civilizations which behave in a more associated and fair fashion will see ego species disappear by their own, fail their fair try at the galactic adventure step. They will meet civilization cadavers, like pyramid builders that have a tendency to get in the "nature wrath" thing. But that may happen at a galaxy scale, if some adequate civilization spots the earth, they may get here while witnessing our end and thus they'll know they're on the right track, ego inflation makes evil civilizations, an example of what not to do, and an example that ends-up in costly, very painful extinction, you may be so scared of it happening to you that you'll preserve a good systematization of reality like your most precious invention, you'll be careful of your attitude, good will thrive and it will have the guns, it will create a morphing reality, not a condemning one, a fair one, not an unfair one, an associated one, not a competition divided one, one based on the biggest quantity of judgment possible, not the smallest and most limited base of judgment possible, all kind of things like that.

Computing ability may be seen as a new dimension too, what if old extraterrestrials gods could travel fast but couldn't do transistor computing? Only some heavy and power and resources hungry basic form? Then a new matter needed to exist, it may be possible the universe was reformulated for its creation, for our computers time form to exist. Maybe they're presently enjoying themselves a boost of technology.

No magnetic field could be seen as too much of a difficulty too, even power could be seen as such, what if the way things worked you needed meter thick wires to carry power because AC power was hardly possible or matter was not meant to work as a power transport, but more like a communication transport? Power was seen as lightning or chemical reactions? A new matter could be necessary for evolution. The same if there was some but very rare or tremendously costly to produce, the matter could have become tremendously valuable, maybe enough so to condemn a civilization. How do you carry the heavy stuff around? And what if you need too much or waste too much as your civilization spread on many planets? What if you make a big precious ball or pile of it and lose it? An accident happens or it crash unto itself or sink in planetary magma, or a competitor destroys everything including himself to steal it?

Many things can led to a universal reformulations, and those may be seen as the opening of new dimensions to things, a different set of possibilities. Is beauty a dimension? Well, the way I'm going I'll have to define what a dimension is for me, and I'll simply replace it by the time facet concept, or I could say new dimensions lead to new time facets, and when a time facet is englobing, like beauty, then you can say it is a dimension of things, whatever it is made from other things, and the universe have to include the new dimension if it is of sufficient value, thus the need for reformulation. Ugliness is a real problem past a certain point, it can stop a whole civilization evolving mentally, becoming a civilization condemnation, a tremendous limitation, but it all depend how you deal with it, if you are capable of looking cute, even just through clothing and garments, then you've got the minimum, from this you'll develop to become prettier, unless you start stuffing life too much with strange indigestible molecules, or use your beauty to become a sexual perversion, in which cases, you may lose it.

Galaxies are probably under different variables of forces, or have different sensitivities to these; the form of associated birthing in our galaxy is love. The human may be the "free" function of knowledge, a bunch of resulting functions and knowledge creating consciousness, the ability to carry a continually independently created, updated and adaptable intelligence in an able body that can morph reality and open many possibilities. Is it a worthy form to reach unknown? Can it grow as one of the best? And what is the ultimate extrapolation of life we know of? We are. Is our knowledge development, understanding and transmitting for stashing ability versus size good enough that we could move efficiently in unknown? Maybe, but this is very relative.

Memory may eventually, in the future, maybe at the interstellar step, become a limitation, what we must preserve at all cost is the capacity to understand and transmit knowledge, we are the form to do it, and the galaxy is a test of that, and making scrap with our true history is a very bat shit. Our deductive ability must be exceptional, as is our ability to transmit knowledge and morph reality.

As for our future, it may be greater than our imagination. Someday, with our abilities, we may go at places no existence have ever been, we'll understand things no knowledge can, we'll understand knowledge that don't understand itself, and the fact that the human form is existing is a proof that life is already judged as critical, life have already brought "existence" great and extraordinary things, so precious it may have become a condemnation. Life may be something so valuable it will never stop existing, and if prioritizing became a function, then existential priorities may have changed from life feedback, the priority may be "ultimate life".

We'll have to form associations, all those galaxies may create all kind of things, and since some will see themselves as top hot with their boats, it is very important that we know war and are not scared of dying, we must have a strong mind and big bombs to blast evil attitudes, we must be able to splatter anybody that act unfair, and it is imperative that we associate with those that don't because we'll be stronger, particularly since we don't know the unknown, we may be appropriate, maybe not, we may be half appropriate, meet a problem that can only be answered by another form that developed a different truth.

Those forms may be very different than what we can imagine and they're going to be all independent; rare are the ones we'll be able to live with (live in the same environment and not hate each other's ways) but we'll all have one thing in common; the blackness of space, we'll all be able to move through it independently, with our own machines. As for our minimal self-efficient traveling proving distance, that may be a galaxy, something like that, and any forces we are under can be used, any technology or knowledge exchanged, since these forces are probably what the UI can provide to reach unknown.

That means we must be ready for anything scary and have the capacity not to worsen things. Someday we may even have to live from inside planetary energy sources to pass a step, even suns transformers may exist for a limited time, like recuperators of something invested in an expansion step process, and maybe a successful life development step would be to find ways to make or relight suns, that may be crazy but you never know the surprises or challenges that will await at the next step, and don't depress or panic...

We may even eventually have to survive the end of a galaxy, or the next step in our development may be to stop it live, or even steer it, anything crazy have some value, we shouldn't close our mind because a scientist wants an Oscar. The universe may even have tangible walls made of matter we can exploit, we may have to dig a hole there, like the crust of the earth, or maybe a hole already exists, one that will open just for us at some point if we are good enough, like a garage, or the barrel of a gun. Some galaxies may produce nothing potable, other galaxies may become home to 10 worthy differences, all unable to breathe the same air. The basic principle is association, whatever they all have to produce their own garments.3/4

Still, at our level, it may be impossible to leave a galaxy, or communicate with others, before a very long time since galaxies may be meant to develop their best formulae of independent consciousness form. And the best implies everything versus the unknown; if your deductive ability makes you believe in things that can't exist, it may not be the best, the same if your logic makes you believe in mirages, and the same if your consciousness is developed for self or destructive goals, the same if you discard everything that don't, or manipulate everything to, fit your mathematical formulas, the same for implementation of knowledge, self-limitations, morphing of reality, both war and association, even beauty, love, emotions, harmonizing counts, everything. As for the use of limited galactic interactions, since everything exists for a reason, it may be the same as before, only limiting traveling or readiness, maybe for a test of stability, but in the end, we'll still have associates and time may decide enmity by revealing each other's history.

All that changes nothing to the fact that I may be wrong in some of my vision of things, how many times have I said it? My vision of the universe may not be complete or the best, or it may be too far-fetched on some facets, like saying it may be possible that, if time is everything and end-up as dust, that suns or black holes have, among many functions, the collecting, arrangement, compression and emission of data that could be decoded as the history (time) of the galaxy by another process. It's just that to me everything exists for a reason, you think there is no critical use for a black hole? You are mistaken, you may not see the use because you limit your vision, but it is all interrelated. Why do magnetic fields exist? You can't say they are not useful for life since without them we wouldn't exist, so who had the genius idea? Nobody? Only science to believe because they'll make the observation that magnetic fields exist logically due to this or that? Why do the sun magnetic field encompasses the whole solar system? Because it is powerful? For me, the ways of magnetic fields, and their many critical functions can only mean reason, and don't forget that to me a force is matter, or matter transformation, a magnetic field is something palpable, so it could be made of stuff that attracts other stuff, among its many functions; all planets with a magnetic field could exchange information.

As for extraterrestrials, they may have a different vision of things than us, and no problem if they don't attack us, we may expose our vision and if they accept it and act as such and not only with us, all the better then, but it may be possible that they present themselves differently to test us, so we must give them a chance. Next, we can't attack someone that is of no risk, unless we need to clear some animals for space, or you don't attack someone unless he's escaping his system as an ego species, but you may give it a second chance if you feel its potential or understand it.

As for ourselves, we cannot make a pressure selection to eliminate different but good forms, we must eliminate those who eliminate or limit good too much, or who make people bad, so it is absolutely necessary for good and bad to exist so you know what these extremes are. Humanity on earth is a test of how we'll have to behave in space, but our neighbor is not bad because he stinks, unless everybody must tolerate him, in that case he's having a spread negative effect which must stop since someday people will start stinking too, become ugly from grimacing, or it will increase revolt and frustration level in massive tolerance that will get displaced to all kind of wrong places. If he can't understand that and find ways to stop stinking, or refuses to get another kind of job, or worse, put pressure to make laws for acceptance and tolerance and compassion and all, then he may have to be removed discriminatorily by force, or even splashed with channel no5 in the worst scenario where there is no other way. That applies to some sicknesses and rich ego people, you can be somewhat rich within some limitations but you must be worth it, or the civilization must have lots of means to waste, the resources and happy people around you must be there, not poor, frustrated, hateful, jealous, tolerating and all who don't know why they are while they're in subjugated admiration of the problem from media pressure to "love" them. And the systematization you make must not give acceptance to jealousy, where you PMBBD people to dream of being superior or rich, thinking it is the right attitude to have and everybody can be a millionaire!

To go back to gods, if matter gets transformed through possibilities, possibilities expanding with time cumulating, then that may mean a possible scenario involves that a first galaxy had to be created, life principles, laws transmitted until high consciousness developed. Then they may have been remade from scratch, the fundamental formulae of life implanted in more galaxies in a bigger universe. Using their knowledge and powers they could travel at tremendous speeds, factions of themselves seeding galaxies with an intelligence boost, accelerating life tremendously. Maybe a handful of high consciousness species were made instead of one too, but they are still part of a process matter took to explore possibilities, a process that may include their existence to increase association chances for its ideal scenario.

Now, this form of "godhood" is the kind I already wrote about a few pages behind where I said there may have been beings that encouraged the ego-gods ideology. Yet today, they wouldn't have the right to act with us in a superior-inferior manner and they wouldn't do, they'd do something different to help us, they could indirectly tell us in what situation we are or what to do to get out of troubles, it is our choice to listen or not unless their pocket computing powers tells them you're a failure or you will fail, or you're an evil civilization; in which case they can ignore you if things are wasted or intervene as "gods" again, or your worst nightmare, particularly if they got some heavy time control form, they could canalize some at your face, so don't be ridiculous with your einsteinium (uuh? I thought I was inventing that one) bombs.

As an added note on extraterrestrials who may have worn the gods coat, past a certain point they must become people, the greatest mass of people possible as a single entity because that's the result you have to deal with when talking civilization, things are not supposed to be dealt with by superiors, or gods or presidents; people as a mass are supposed to deal directly, but such a concept doesn't exist on earth yet, whatever the ego manipulators who took control of everything will say the representative democratic system is doing just that, but it is all a manipulation lie, I don't have my say in nothing and that's a fact, while my judgment is as valuable as the judgment of any president, so I want my say on most facets of the budget and every law, everything that is of concern to me. And don't say it can't be possible, that's PMBBD, it is possible and I'll explain it in the next chapter. But probably people will prefer to destroy the earth trying bullshit before taking in consideration what a no name has to say, since that's what most ego people wanted and created to rule. And that's my worth, I aint got the means and I'm not fitting the wanted stereotypes projected by the medias.

To go back to my things, one goal among many is association, another goal is to battle evil, so we are better never forget our competition and war history, and I never said it was not important to be the first in the cake, it's better than to be the last... So yes we may meet intelligence since we may come to surpass our universal limited capacities to reach unknown, and a universe reformulation for new dimensions may include that some life result be preserved since the mathematics, functions and time forms is all a process, the result is variable, memorizing and recreating the final form of the universe doesn't work, the mathematics involved surpasses all mathematical possibilities of any dust quantity, it may not even be possible for a single being, it's exactly like finding the luck formulae deduction that will recreate it; you'll have to take into consideration the mathematical history of every little particles of the universe, all humanity, all your lotto numbers will have to be recreated in the right order, and your result will still not be "connected" to new dimensions, and what about the mind, would it work? Memory is kind of weird in a brain you know, but maybe an unconscious could be created, and before dying a movie could be saved, you could write one hell of a book to know who you are too...

So you may have to preserve the best life-forms living, then incorporate them back in the process to transmit their form or update them to the new life standards. And don't forget I'm into memory circulation, they could be read by new processes of matter communication; everywhere they "set foot", they are "read" by life processes, which includes the discarding of wrong stuff and the association of the good stuff, since the new reformulation will include new filtering processes to go hand in hand with the new dimensions to things. Then the new memory is cumulated anew and "forever" kept. As life systems develop with time passing, they uses the stuff their own way, life forms with new possibilities and properties, and some stuff definitively will have to wait for some extraordinary events, like space ships.

Since gods may be retards, a new dimension resulting from the needs of life evolution may include anything, like sleep, did they sleep? Or a stronger connection to life, through reproduction (the initial unconscious), or even dreams can be seen as an added dimension, did they dream? How many universal reformulation steps "life" have been through? Will we ever know? The memory may be too heavy to keep, maybe only the simple story exists, and you may find a hundred gods in there, they may be dead, but I'd prefer to believe they still exist, being assigned a galaxy where their form is better developed, their memory, or weight in dust concerning their dimension, limited to some fuel, until they settle somewhere in comfort in a kind of place where galactic intelligence future steps are; until that happens, they do what they want, if they make scrap of the galaxy, it's the end of them, but if they succeed at attaining somewhat their goals or better then things continue for them. They could even be in some competition, with losers and winners, new forms successes may be seen as a plus, and winners continue with their developing new forms. But they're within us and life and that's the minimal form of memory, they're everywhere in life.

Everything universal probably got life morphing variable capacities as an added function, the universe variables can change to adapt a little to life variations, but not much because it would destroy life, or maybe it can be done very slow; we may think we can't live healthily in appesanteur, only to find out in a trillion years it is very comfortable after all, something have changed, part life, part galaxy, part universe. And it may even go in its steps to transfer forms; we may make big plans for a resource only to find out it doesn't exist anymore, you can't even make some, so some dimensions may be transformed to something else, even in galaxies, depending on the will of the species there, as they develop truth. Maybe the dream dimension can disappear, or become more real, a half hallucinating dimension being experimented, and some pay with some forms of schizophrenia, or maybe it's an old dimension that is having troubles adjusting or that doesn't want to because it is truly hot new stuff, like a life system communication strategy. Maybe our form bought that thing from some other ugly face, I wouldn't doubt the human kind of mind at getting its fair share of things, but I don't think that's how things work, I think everybody would need each others and they all just follow the steps imposed to them, and if we exist it is because our life development formulae have been successful until now.

What we develop is developed with what is available in the best fashion possible, and that includes waiting, patience. What if you have to wait a trillion years for a process to end? You may fail right there in entertainment, or sex insanity, becoming something inefficient that can't change or adapt quickly enough. So maybe you can optimize a lot of time forms to a single activity, sleep, which incorporates many efficiency principles concerning the whole brain arrangement because one way or the other it must be done, and you may want to profit from surplus energy to use the time to develop powerful entertainment, and significative at it, and personal too, and related to your reality, to eventually wake up with some meaning, some thinking in the morning, an a happy day of actual reality, more happiness in a satisfying state of mind.

Did I already say I believe many animals could be half hallucinating? And maybe they're happy with it, living for it, I would never dare disturb my cat while he's dreaming, I watch him and try to imagine what kind of adventures he's in. But you must have consciousness of your hallucinations, and that's in part why I'm open to the possibility of dreams as a developing dimension; my own dreams are of a level I have never heard about, but I still don't have sufficient consciousness of them, I feel (remember what I wrote about feelings?) their potential, but in any of their best form (uses) it is evident to me that they are not working perfectly well yet. A big part of the problem, if you remember how I see most dreams, is that we're all wrong in our reality and our languages are not developed to represent the truth of our feelings, they are developed to manipulate, soon some guru will sell a book on how to control dreams, which would be completely at the opposite goal of their existence; it is one thing to have consciousness of your dreams enough to wake-up remembering them, and it is another to consciously invent yourself a story, in fact, the principle is totally ridiculous since if you want to invent yourself a story, you just have to use your imagination, you can even invent Hollywood stories with your imagination! A dream is an unconscious thing going on in your sleep, made from life interpretation of feelings, destroy that and you may as well destroy the human. So dreams may be under a modifier development process, a dream modifier trying to connect straight and efficient, it may be growing or shrinking depending a lot in conflicting lines, I think it would be growing to englobe our developing complexity, but it may take more tangible form after we're more comfortable and straight in our thinking, in a million years, or maybe a hundred thousand to start feeling its grip on you.

If dust is limited the universe may reformulate itself many times until it got the life formulae that will be happy to spread life, like us leaving our system to reproduce elsewhere. And this formula doesn't necessarily recreate the same life because it is under all kind of acceleration and pressure functions coming from life systems, particularly with gods around. But the minimum for a start is to have the formulation that permits life to exist, and preferably under many top forms to know what the ideal life environment is, and that minimum includes that life comes to understand the situation it is in, everything in steps and efficiency and all, everything must work in best harmony, thus increasing efficiency. Wasting 3/4 the memory investment in failed understanding is not much of a success at that step, the universe may reformulate itself for better results, while keeping those that did understand enough and had enough will, thus increasing efficiency.

The form of the universe can take any logical extrapolations from knowledge permitting life's existence: if you end-up traveling in a tunnel, it simply means the tunnel must exist for the new function (us, life) to reach the unknown. You can see it as a refining and optimizing time forms process for the creation of ultimate life, taking a blunt thing and separating it in a hundred different facets, then things are reformulated to modify quantity of facet and their values, for life to always go farther in its abilities; if lightning is not an adequate form of power for life, then new forms of power will come to exist that will be fine enough for life to play with, while adding accumulating ability so that their precise fine source can be cumulated or transformed, for life controlled lightning functions if need be, meaning power transformation usable by life may be seen as a priority, steps of power manipulations for transformation in whatever life need, but the life must work first.

Now, the big fun will start in some billions years, a long time, can you spread? Most life variations will go by to take the toilet within that time, what will be left are those that will probably like and understand life the best, with the best judgment ability etc, and they'll come to control more and more powerful time forms. So maybe, someday, in a trillion years, you'll play with dust; atoms and particles will be aligned flat on your table while you try to think if a different speed of light would open worthwhile possibilities, you'll change all kind of values to infinite mathematics creating new dimensions to things, dimensions you can adapt to, the way you'll make them work.

It's cool playing in universe and gods' things, but we're far from any of my views in this reality so what's my problem? I may be a psychiadelictric problem, or I think too much and it's bad? Or is it a poverty and lack of sex thing? Or is it a fighter's thing? Yeah, you're not much if you don't find something to fight against in hell, depending on the side you're on I guess, or what's important to you... As for what is reflected in this book, you can see very well that my intelligence is different, I could say my intelligence is more feeling and judgment based, I'm very limited mathematically and scientifically, there are no mathematic formulas in this book, it is basic understanding 101.

And you have the right to believe in things like that, don't let media people and Hollywood dictate the path of your imagination, or is it illegal to the point that my work will be manipulated to inexistence by paranoid hypocrites? Or profited from by ego inflated morons? Maybe it's illegal to think differently in this reality, it could spread, so it must remain local, small, ignored. But I say it takes one failure of a reality to censorship or steal or manipulate the work of writers, or make their life impossible, or cause their death. My views have a right to be known as I wrote them, whatever powerful people fear poor people like me using writing to express their soul, whatever religious crackpots will shout heresy, whatever science crackpots will shout insanity; you got religions all over the place, let my imagination shine! So scientists who will want to protest against my view should go fight religious writings if they want to fight. And my view is just a beginning, something that has been removed from better understanding by ego institutions and systems.

The same for media people; why don't you attack the bible? Never? You discriminatorily attack or encourage based on your view of the world, manipulator, you continually create hype for or praise stupid or evil people; you sleep with them? Yeah, to the point that you're dependent and you made it a dependence to justify and to pressure select, and then you'll criticize me? This world is made from media people influences who think themselves intelligent and good, any book can find itself a bunch of admiring intellectualities from television or internet to praise and create hype to sell, why not mine? why? Ah, my English is not academically perfect, while the bible is? Anyway, I have a hard time believing this reality will be capable of doing something else than profiting from the imagination in my work while laughing or bitching about the rest, since ego competition and jealousy oblige... But without media people helping I can almost say I wasted my time, so things don't look good. Are you capable of talking about ego or evil without laughing or looking like a priest? Give it a profoundly logical definition and fight for it? Not a hypocrite bullshit made to adapt people to your manipulation standards? If you are to attack my views, are you game to attack the bible too? Or it is a sacred book, apart? One thing's for sure, ignoring me, laughing, or making of my life a hell, then crying for pardon when I'll be dead, you'll grow a genetic sorry before seeing another me if I'm incomparable and irreplaceable, fool...

Yes, eh, I was saying that everything is a process, and the earth is under processes that are outside life intervention possibilities too, including us, and it means that at a smaller scale our absolute priority is to live independently on another planet or moon of the system with enough resources exploitation structures to permit travel within the system and survival for millions of years, that's our minimal job; survive as long as we can within our system while witnessing processes taking place and profiting from those. Yet, some earth processes can be accelerated or slowed down, manipulated, whatever they are inevitable, and since we have no idea of what all these processes are, it means we'll have to experiment unbelievable things on other moons or planets; there are many possibilities you can believe in until they are proven impossible.

If the possibility for an interstellar vessel comes to exist, we must do it, no? And I believe it does since if we can travel within our system we can travel to a close star too if we want to see it near enough. Now all is missing is fuel, good armor and patience, and don't ruin the solar system, and guns. I heard a few people say that interstellar travel is impossible; this is a ridiculous affirmation, if it has become impossible then it's the end of humanity, if it was never possible then we were doomed from day one, or unlucky, or we were a test, and me I'll need some explaining either from gods or the UI because life and the whole universe formed and filled my soul. Since I doubt those people to be in gods' secrets, then I say it is not because your gang doesn't know how to do it presently that it's impossible forever; you don't possess total and final knowledge, you're creating mind limitations with such words as "impossible", we are ignorant besides what's possible technologically, we've not even begun scraping at something else than our planet. My opinion could change if those words came out of the mouth of someone who is supposed to have credibility, like a government, then it may means powerful people have come to deduct that we're at the end of a critical resource and they want people to go back religious for a source of hope, even if there shouldn't be a need to with all the entertainment and production of mind and mood altering drugs out there, and the who cares attitude, the PMBBD and the level of acceptance, tolerance and adaptation of the proud subjugated selection justified in heavy socialization and competition. The preventive pressure must never stop until the end, the rich will do anything to keep their manipulation and control for profits mentality until the earth is a dead rock with them as the last ones standing on it.

Our first goal for space exploration is not to gain votes, it is to find ice and resources, we won't build space stations for the show, we won't build a base until we develop resources exploitation plans to produce resources that don't come from earth. We must find the ice or water then build in function of it. We must always use earth's resources as last resort means. Don't forget that if we succeeded at loading moon rocks in a vessel to bring them to earth, then it means we can exploit almost anything in our system, our limitations are self imposed by our attitudes (priorities) with earth's resources.

The main emphasis of scientific space industry should be far travel in space to find a setup that will permit us to build things in lower gravity without clumsy suits if possible. We should start experimenting heavy resource management, whatever we bring resources to earth, the moon or Pluto.

We must find exploitable water or ice to do a base on a nearby low gravity moon is what I see as an immediate goal, try to make that base as useful as possible by exploiting around, grow it for a hundred people, and continue building exploitation and transport points structures, until we got tremendous quantities of resources available to be canalized for a big base that can build planet transformation for colonization plans.

Once the system is systemized and we have guaranteed resources, that most people on earth are truly happy without bad afterthoughts and life is thriving, then we can have access to incredible possibilities, unbelievable projects to accomplish. We'll be terraforming planets, building cities in the most unlikely of places without thinking of many problems we have on earth as comfort will become more of a "priority"; we'll be living a little golden age, but not as big as when we'll be breathing free on another planet, and not as big as when our first interstellar vessel will land safely on another potable star.
That's a simplified and not 100% right view, evidently, but taking the means for this is what I see as a priority, anything else in space as a present goal doesn't make much sense for a long time (except launching useful satellites and resources and means calculations). Again, the worst use of resources we can make is for wars and ego gods, which have been our priority until now, and it's not much better to waste tremendous amount of water and resources smiling around playing space tourists and Sunday scientist too. Anybody that needs to go to space to care or to find humility is either a moron or an evil person there to show off. I'm talking presently, with the limited resources we have and the fantastic pollution it creates, but I guess profiteers will disagree; they'll want everybody there and any manipulative bullshit to get you to long for the trip will be an argument, with ads on TV about how wonderful it is, how you'll learn lessons of life that you could learn on earth just by caring, but I guess you didn't spend a million as a justification...But now you can boast around, you're special, bigger, another class, until it only costs a thousand buck, they say, then it will be an ordinary trip, tourism for a wow, to do stupid, but isn't it how space tourism started in the first place? As an unfairly rich (evil) person doing the clown? Then justifying his extravaganza by saying emotive bullshit about life? But I understand that evil is first in hell...If you know how I see evil, where philanthropy doesn't help... I say learn life and ego lessons before getting all excited about space, ego excitation and bullshit for grants will destroy any dream about it. These lessons you learn them by dropping your ego portraits, doing tourism for pictures and to justify your insignificance with a wow, but you don't care, so that's what you'll have left behind you as you lived, fake stuff good for the garbage, since producing garbage as you filled your soul with garbage in your social acceptance quest is all what kept you away from depression...I'm bad? Just care! I hope you'll be dead when the rise of conscience will come to worsen your insignificance, that way you won't worsen things still more with the needs you prepared for your old days.

Ok? For now sending robots everywhere to gather data is the right thing to do, to some extent, this extent is usefulness, and I'm not talking usefulness to get grants...You can ruin the earth sending robots to finds microbes, but I don't see that as a priority. The same applies to the space station, most of the reasons for its continuation are wrong, it's 10 years useless at science, worse, most of the science made there could have been made on earth at a fraction of the cost, we're spending tons of money on this thing while it's only useful for is space tourism and keeping people in space a long time.

You want people to live in space? Then start with the moon, as we build things there technology will grow and longer voyages to build self-sustaining places will become more of a reality. I don't like the idea that we should install ourselves immediately on mars as a priority, at tremendous continual expenses from earth.

What this mars collective orgasm will have taught me, apart how vulnerable people are to media bullshit and Hollywood martians, is that many people are eager to try long voyages in space, whatever they have to live in highly restraining environments; some for the glory, a lot for the advancement of life. People are right to be impatient, we're late, very late, what are we waiting for? Bodybuilder astronauts? Within 50 years we can have lift-off capabilities on the moon to robotically build basic structures on other habitable environments, mars will make far more sense then, if there is something useful to do there at that point... We got a few ice moons with everything to permit human survival too, some could even have fishes, that's a lot better than microbes! If not we can still make all kind of fish farms as we stash fuel for landing vessels. The goal is system auto sufficiency, but nothing wrong if you got a transport full of stuff from the earth landing for Christmas, which can be the ship needing refueling. So we lift-off from earth to the moon, the moon acts as massive store and construction site with refuel capabilities, then we go farther.

All these places without an atmosphere may have one fusion minerals or another, except crap mars that may not have much of it, so that may be the fuel we'll eventually want to use, and that's some powerful fuel. Mars got deuterium, which may end-up as the only useable fuel for fusion the way this is developing, and the result may not be much better than the fission reactors we already build, I remember the hype... That's not good for space travel, you'll need helium 3 reactors, which may be too complex to build and too dangerous for us. We'll have time to disappear before we have these, not good enough for such power I guess... But you got helium 3 on the moon, at least we can play with it, make a little stash of it with time, it could become useful.

As for those long trips, people have everything to tolerate them, if you don't demonize them for the monotony I guess...In fact, the worse attitude for space travel may actually be the mediatized attitude; heavy socialization in the name of liking overpopulation while not thinking of your expendability, life's too short to care, as you babble background chimpanzee noise and write barely legible hieroglyphs, at least you'll leave behind selfies to color the family tree...Or is it to show what you stood for to future generations that will suffer the worst failures of humanity? I'm generalizing a lot, and I wouldn't debate the use of heavy socialization and overpopulation in this reality, these things are necessary for the country competition and the economy.... What I know is that it doesn't work on me, and I'm far from alone at that, so I'm sure there are many loners who would not only tolerate such a trip, but actually enjoy them as a far deeper experience than what you'd get out of your classic grunt, as long as they are mentally stable. And no need to train people like crazy, just don't embark those who think it will be easy, you need serious people who are habile both mentally and manually, capable of working intensively as much as passing time without doing stupidities.

You'll need lots of screen entertainment, game, movies and music, not charged as it should be on earth for these things. Nothing wrong with music instruments and light effects, but not too loud, you wouldn't want to pop out those rivets... I don't see a problem with space weed too, the illegal stuff in X3, as long as it doesn't clog filters and affect other passengers, so a specific "last frontier of air pollution" room may have to be created for smokers. We'll want exercise machines and trainers too evidently; we all know mind and body exercise is critically important. Communication will have to work freely both ways, filtered communication for manipulation and disinformation will contort the experience and make a mess of judgment, this is valid as much for personal exchanges as for public ones, I'll always fight those who arrange facts to fit their vision or to protect the fragile mind of people (the result of manipulating and hiding the truth as a philosophy to keep a type of people reigning as superiors, but you can concentrate solely on the positive aspects of things to get this result too, live as a happy retard with a judgment that can't be trusted, the perfect democratic voter...) As for gravity, maybe an interior curved design could make people profit from longer turning accelerations and decelerations, they change a little their interior design if need be; if you cut off most travel time of free fall, it may be sufficient.

This is where true love takes its meaning too; you need people who got a good view of it as a prerequisite, because sexual pressures in people with a twisted vision of love having the liberty to put pressure or boast around without respect will just make of the whole trip a hell for many people, and you better not give birth in an enclosed jealousy situation. But I wouldn't be ashamed to try birthing a year after launch, if they grew among people with some minds, and had access to good learning programs on computers. It doesn't mean it will go well, but I'd try. We'll need to stop thinking people can't reproduce in ships, science won't pop people on planets or inter-dimension them, or upload them, or resuscitate them, or space fold them, forget it, hundreds of years will be necessary to travel "far" in space, and gaining productive science is beginning to take a lot of time, but they say they'll grow anything from nanotech before 2050, so yes maybe some tech are worth the wait...

We can skip the walking everywhere step for as long as we don't have a base on the moon. When the base is working, we'll want a few vessels with return capabilities, hoping around with heavy instrumentation, and some cargo if you think carrying a light lander will be necessary. Such vessels may not need to be a lot bigger than a shuttles, and they won't land back on earth, so they can be shot off the earth in one piece, and we may profit from such lunching to send them a little farther first, while we prepare the refueling system.

Thrusters may stay attached and flaming right to the moon where they are separated, slowed down and made to land, or carefully crash land, on a safe spot near a pole where you think something good may later be made out of them, like ice tanks for a future base, and being near a pole will permit to construct things in shadow or under the sun depending on needs. Solar power can provide a lot, and at that size, you can make a cargo space in the thrusters, which can become the start of a base, with the thruster as a future content of atmosphere, or a store, with a sass tunnel to developing complex some distance away, or a gas recuperation system like co2 and fumes, you could try a garden in there, with some mirrors for canalized light.

What I mean is that they could be used as future possibilities, and while the vessels are traveling for many years, and wait in geosynchronous orbit if they come back before things are ready for refueling, we'll gain a lot of expertise on how to best start a base on such a body as a moon, one we have very near. When we can profit from an opportunity to open more possibilities, we must look at the worth of modifying our things if we think it can be used for other opportunities in the future or save much resources or money. The same for specialized works, it can fulfill many roles, but the more specialized the more limited. So while exploring we should try to use what we're supposed to dump for future possibilities, and dumping it carefully on the moon would be nice. And maybe some satellites are better on the moon as debris than disintegrated on earth too. A kind of orbital collector may eventually be worth it, if it stays in space it could make a low and slow approach of the moon and dump what it collects there near a potential base point. A lot can be made to grow the base possibilities, or stashing and protecting ability, and eventually, old vessels may end their life there.

For now I'd study the space station to know if it can be modified to become a loading unloading and refuel point for our project, that way we could start work immediately, then it would become a back-up in case the moon base explodes from country competition... There are other options, refuel and resupply logistics may take the form of tanks sent right after launch and made to go in orbit somewhere, minimal trust involved. Cheap drums, and when the vessel passes nearby, it sends a fishing line with a magnet to carefully reel back the drum in...The fishing line is just an option...

I'd even put a couple of people in there to humanize the experience, but that may double the size so I'm not sure it's a good idea. Those vessel don't have to carry heat shields and wings since they won't land back on earth. So while we save money on some aspects, we work to make a refuel and repair point on the moon, and with lots of time this base will make far bigger vessels practically in their entirety. Those vessels may be constructed in orbit around the moon, with cheap shuttles lifting materials off from the moon surface, maybe catapult or spring loaded launches for the materials can work, and then you only need small thrusters to control the mass.

I'm sure a hundred people base that is not too expensive to maintain is possible, and it can be underground, with walls made of concrete or epoxy and a few exits. Supplies may not need actual "vessels" to get there, and that may apply to a few other moons as supplies don't need to travel at high speeds, just steady; you align them a little better than a basketball player, give a little kick, and slow them down at the right moment with something the base can use. Then you let the receiving end collect those with a few adapted transports.

But before that we'll need better suits; dust in the joints may become a problem, and a set of laws; you don't want a thousand people playing dirt bike on the moon, only a few, and not too fast, you could attain escape velocity... The base could be started as a modular thing too, you drop a few inflatable module and they are connected by a "dryer" tube. It's not the safest option, but there shouldn't be mars sand storm on the moon, and the goal is just to start it as more serious construction takes form.

Having a small population, eventually in the hundreds, may be a necessary experience too, but the base must be made with far goals in mind, will it be useful in the far future? Can it last? A base must have a use which makes it worth it in cold hard facts of value, not only science; it must have a rewarding palpable goal, while making a stash of something valuable. The moon may become our main base of vessel construction if there are many things worth it, like ice, iron and helium 3; maybe cold fusion engines or electricity can be experimented and found to be possible, engines that need space stuff, the space power step is open to you if you succeed, are you worthy? Mmm, too easy, and maybe it was all bullshit, who know the truth of science these days...The question is what useful resource can we exploit on the moon; if we can make aluminum and steel there in big quantities, then hurrah, it will become the main attachment base of the whole system for a lot of time, as we get what's missing from elsewhere, even if that's years away; you "just" need to systemize things. If not then we can make a simple refuel base by producing hydrogen from water. If nothing can be exploited nowhere, and it's not a political lie, then we'll have to modify our vision to do everything from earth, and the goal will be the terraformation of one of our planet, and if that's not possible, then immediate colonization of an already adequate planet around another star. Nothing else, we don't build bases for fun for as long as this step is not taken.

I understand that it will take some time to build exploitation structures, but are we spending our means to do that or for entertainment "gods", politicians, war etc? What is an acceptable voyage in space for now, 10 years? How long to build a vessel? 10-15 years? How long to have people living on the moon? 10-15 years? With some associated effort I'm sure it could be all be done within 20 years, done and working with humanity living pride, not hope. I don't believe a single world about the wonderful utopia science reserves us for 2050 with nanobots building people atoms by atoms and the associated stash of gold and jewels since everybody can be a millionaire, Christians having their food pop by magic Jesus style to end hunger, always, since we'll need 10 times more food because microbiology will produces fat shields so everybody become rock hard as they eat no end and develop super intestines to expel all the fat and oil straight to the oceans, which will saturate with greasy fishes full of omega 3, that way we'll finally get the smarter planet, and we'll have fat fuel for cars too...I'm skipping the ugly images... We'll have massive nonocarbon factories to make space elevators for free space tourism, and we'll produce solar powered bouncing rubber power sex robots emotive for everybody to have a pet to fuck around with, every home will be solar powered, no more pollution, the oceans will have automated cleaning systems, radioactivity will be recycled while fusion energy light up the whole planet like a Christmas tree, life will thrive evidently, everybody will be smiling naturally, with a mood controlled remotely, all is missing is genetic reformulation so everybody have a super big penis. 2050 is the big year man, be happy ahead of time, laugh at people like me, you know better, or inflate yourself a big balloon of hope and watch jubilating science guys on TV... We'll even have people living on mars! But we still won't have a useful base on the moon, except maybe a bunker system for some rich people, why? Because rich manipulators associate themselves with people who reinforce their beliefs, like sects? And they sure don't have time to develop a global mind, so let's go with the publicized view and spend the money they took that shouldn't be theirs on projects made popular from media bullshit that will give them a big philanthropist image? Let's say I'm wrong and they hide knowledge that would change my opinion instead, how about that? Not much better, so I suppose it's because people hate the moon, it's grey, we already went there, too near, monotony, not even worth a look anymore, ego people do things to boast.

You must know earth's resources capacities and find a way to always satisfy earth's needs for these, it is our home world, not a dump or a piece of food, we must always make it better, we're supposed to develop the place as our paradise, and that's how we should feel in our soul here. That's why our second most massive base should be where massive easy critical resources can be gotten, like ice or gas, maybe the asteroid belt could be exploited easily, maybe Jupiter could have a base on one of its moons too.

You might consider mars or one of its moons as a future base if you see things as a matter of priorities and usefulness within a global view, but there is a satellite around Jupiter that is made of ice, and Jupiter got interesting resources too, so that may be our priority to explore, but I still believe we can't reach such goals before experiencing life on the moon which should remain main system attachment point; the place that got the most resources receiving capabilities for building big things.

A base must be worth it with credible schemas of development and feasible future resources exploitation possibilities, it must be seen as a chain of actions that will somewhat lead everything to become independent of earth resources, and collecting surpluses, and you won't do that with rich profiteers for sure; you need minds motivated beyond money, with a good attitude and working in associated harmony, you need that, if not you'll do things wrong, too quickly at the wrong time, out of competition, to profit from a cake or to satisfy people's PMBBD hype; you think going to mars with people is presently necessary? Nothing seriously useful to do there, you'll just twist the mental reward that will be a mess from evil manipulations to make it big and wonderful because they'll find a microbe while it will be a tremendous waste of resources. So why mars and not the moon? We're not serious? It's a matter of reality I say, doing a mars base as a priority is a reflection of a failed philosophy and mentality, I even doubt this reality can make a moon base that makes sense, particularly with the type of governing structure we have, where the base development would be dependent from governmental mood, which changes every 4 years...

Anyway I'm thinking a lot ahead of myself with all that, this reality is too much of a mess, anything big, even just going to mars, will be one extraordinary challenge because division and competition for profiting will cause too many problems at such a scale, it will be a ruin to produce and you'll be lucky if it doesn't malfunction from evil involvement at profiting. I'll add that my vision is my opinion, so whatever you do I'll be with you, because I'm human too, so I'll wish you great luck, whatever my "pessimist" attitude, and that applies to all those times I said we're good for the hole; I don't want that, but evil must be battled, I must hold my line, sorry, so yes I'll command killings if necessary, but in nobody else name but mine, my justifications, and that can go to the extent of associating as much as possible with people with similar "problems" on their life quest, and space is a quest that concerns everybody, so it is necessary to be associated, it concerns every person that wants to call itself a human, that association is what I call a systematization, a reality, a simple associating basis everybody lives on.

As for the money and expertise to do it; it exists. I don't have a good opinion of country competition, rich people, war machine, satellites overload; maximal earth communication doesn't need more than a few good satellites, not a throng of companies polluting space in competition; if we were not condemned to country division and competition we could all use our expertise associated instead of divided to do it and it would cost nothing more in space spending. Yet, eliminating most war games and placing that life energy to space advancement would be something.

But the ways of this reality will probably not permit us to do anything else than setting foot on mars as an extraordinary thing for PMBBD and an election, but totally useless to anything else than scientists being, as always, totally flabbergasted about the history of the rock like it's totally worth it. We've already exploited a lot of resources as a waste for ego competition, and that is accelerating.

I don't want humanity to disappear while saying "we set foot on mars!" no, we'll go to mars if it's worth it and not a ruin to stay there "permanently", making it life friendly is the best scenario, but that may not be possible if solar winds constantly strips it of an atmosphere. If we are to live there we'll do it at minimal cost to the earth and it will be a part of the systematization necessary to go farther. So we won't go to mars for whatever hint of a reason that doesn't make sense, and for the complete senseless package; there are no reasons that presently make sense. We want to go there for the science? What science? Rock study that will show the solar system formed? Aren't they tired to always end-up wrong about that? They even have big books and videos describing their wrong view as a final truth, why do they constantly need to run after rocks for that if they know everything? You think your rocks will explain the history of mars? You are not even capable of knowing the true history of the earth from looking at a planetfull of rocks available to the whole scientific establishment! You'll end-up making all kind of wrong affirmations again. I don't say rock science is useless, I say science is acting like religions these days, and it is wasting tremendous means on wrong priorities, doing the flabbergasted about rocks while it is useless, or to find life, and when we'll find a microbe they'll be out of their pants like it's a great extraordinary thing like the investment was entirely worth it, then they'll want more, to keep their useless jobs...

I already explained there is life anywhere the environment makes it possible; is it possible there is an environment on mars where a form of life could exist? The answer is evidently yes, so there is life, and not only one but probably many microscopic life-forms in all its different cracks, I know it, they know it, nothing extraordinary there. Is there life on the moon? Yes there is, just find an environment where it could exist, if there is ice then they'll probably find a microbe there, I know it, they know it, nothing extraordinary there. We are going to mars for the wrong reasons, on hype, for Hollywood reasons, for an election, or to plant a possessive flag, or to keep scientists fat with grants. If you want my go you'll make projects that have human expansion in mind, and I believe that step passes by a base on and around the moon to develop what will be needed to go farther.

I don't know what's so big about mars that we must see it as presidential priority, what will we do there? Spot a microbe? Survive very expensively? Collect data for future possibilities for life is the only valid reason, and robots seems competent at that, to some extent; robots are cool and all, but when you know you have no use going to a place for a very long time, then switch priority, stop ruining the country sending robots to make cute photographs, I say send a satellite that will plant deep probes at strategic places to find water that's not too deep for reach, but water is still not an argument alone. What's the use of sending robots after robots after robots for scratching mars surface and looking at rocks? Wow, a mineral! You think you'll stumble on a sandal? A communist! Be careful not to get face to face with your own robots, you could have a heart attack, but yes you could drop a weird skeleton there, along with the robot, to give a purpose to humanity and get peoples back on the ego-god track...

You still got to wonder if sending 20 robots to mars to gather information is better than making 2 serious voyages with humans onboard and gather a thousand times more information (not intelligence, gathering intelligence is a twisted view made to glorify something, like spying, like spying or going to mars is so good you actually gather IQ points; you gather information, or knowledge.)

For now mars is very far away as a first base, useless at it it seems, except for tourism I suppose, one way tourism should be fine though... Oh, there is the microbe argument I should not forget, is there a microbe on mars??? Yes, ok? You don't have to find it, then mount an expedition to save it and bring it back to earth! Every planet may have seen one life step or another, some rock formation are even made from life transformation procedures, as steps, there is life to try transforming any environment, it doesn't mean mars was full of life or Hollywood Martians.

The goal is not to find life, the goal is to spread life while studying and enjoying the life we meet, understood? That's what the scientific community should emphasizes, that way mars will become less of a priority; if you want to find life, there is a ton of it all over the earth that we have no idea about. I think they make it this big to manipulate, like finding life will be like we just colonized another planet, we're having a golden age, TV people who got NASA tattooed big on their ass, who always look like they're illuminated on LSD, to the point that being wrong is an argument to look happier, will just explode from joy like finally, humanity is saved!

I even believe Jupiter is far more promising with its moons as a second base, all kind of extraordinary options are open if there is water there. But if you absolutely need to go to mars to find treasures, then all-right, I bow to the treasure argument, we'll pay you a drilling and exploration voyage, and we'll give you the means so you do things well, surplus means, like time, but we'll do it in an optic that all bodies as big or bigger than mars can be explored with the same transport means. If the first works well we'll produce a better one every 10-15 years as experience and technology gets better, for 3 that will do the same kind of job; but we won't produce a specialized superstructure by visit to every moons and planets for sure, even if that's what ego reality would do in its competition, to do things faster and less expensively to end up taking far more time to explore everything while costing a hundred times more in resources and life energy, while losing half the means to enrich this guy or that.

Whatever we do we'll need a first efficiency point, a place where we'll build the necessary structures for exactly such endeavors; you can't blast everything off the earth, you don't even want to use earth resources, what you want is those resources produced from elsewhere, at a surplus rate, and you want the ability to build in space from resources that have been sent there. You can have that with a gigantic station with appesanteur troubles, or you can have that on a moon from which you can lift-off more easily; I prefer a moon because there's water and minerals there, it's got long term stability, you can run about a little, and things can be caught more easily too. A vessel construction station in orbit around the moon could work as the next step, but it may not be necessary. Yet, whatever we do in the end, having a second extra planet we can comfortably live on is an absolute priority because the possibility that earth life get "accidented" exists, and it is worthless taking care of life if we invest everything condemning ourselves to die with it.

We must do moon prospecting until we find proven massive ice with useful resources, then the next step will be to find some and try to bring it to the moon, is there ice in the asteroid belt? Iron? We must systemize a few basic resources and transform them to different uses without constantly lifting everything from the earth, a big base where around a hundred people can work, for some social. Forget about a small base for 3-4 scientists, if we want to succeed at toughing a long time in space we'll have to be a big enough community, 3-4 people is for starting things. The base can be composed of dropped modules at first, but it must be there because there are jobs to do.

We will learn to grow food and animals in far less gravity, and while we succeed at that we'll make appropriate vessels that can survive by themselves for a minimum of 5 years to fly around the system while carrying a lander for moons, ideally, or at least a radio controlled robotic lander capable of lifting up materials from moons while exploring. And yes one goal is to get at the science, but we'll need a design capable of lifting resources from moons to orbit not only for earth moon, but for every moon where we can exploit something, we can make a machine kind of thing to exploit resources and load them in a container that can carry them all the way to earth moon where we'll build things and service our vessels. I personally have a weakness for a fishing line of nanocarbon for this, with a magnet or hook at the end; if the gravity is not too much you just use a small explosion from simple hydrogen to send the container flying, then the base or vessel in orbit reels it in.

If we are to produce such ships, I believe the moon scenario is still the best, but this scenario exist only if it is worth it, we may discover another moon got far more to offer than the earth moon, and so our attention should switch there because it can provide more; if the earth moon provide almost nothing as self-help or resources, then we have not much to do there; but we may still have to build one nearby as a necessary hub point. So a moon base or in orbit around it makes sense one way or the other.

We'll need a minimum of gravity and food growing in these vessels, and we'll need to think of building a big transport fleet while our exploration vessels are away since they are not a final step, only the beginning. We know we'll need to exploit stuff, so we need to build versatile cargoes that will do all kind of jobs triple ways, while wasting no production, except fuel and garbage to some extent. Such cargoes will be big things, they'll transport base modules, satellites, people, resources etc, more specialized ones will be produced for infinite steady exploitations, like collecting gas around a planet, or water, and bringing these things to a moon city, which can have access to 4-5 main gigantic resources quantities nearby, like water or ice, iron or bauxite, and many gases. For the rest, mining bases can do the job.

That's another argument for the necessity to have a big enough earth moon base as a priority, a place to experiment growing food, lasting long in limited gravity, and water conservation and recycling for sure. Even thrusting will have to be careful using water for as long as a big source is not systemized. But we still need to start with a base on the moon, and it could be minimally useful in case a too big cataclysm happens on earth, and we'll have to experiment such a thing one way or the other.

For now, that means updating all these industries producing short lived garbage, if we can't make electronics and spotlights that last 20 years we're not worth space, and the same for love, and the same for growing food, if we can't grow food in space we have no place there. The farthest we should go right now is a place where we can experiment growing food, there will be some waste in growing food or animals, can't recycle everything, but if gravity is a prerequisite we'll have to find the levels that are needed. Again I would believe the moon would be perfect as a gravity level to experiment and develop these things, gardening and raising animals under big constraints. We'll still need food packs and recycle our garbage in the infinite synthetic steak machine, but with the life we'll develop in limited gravity we'll be able to feed people and bring them life joys, and the risk people end-up doing cannibalism will be lower. And don't think such a thing can't happen, if the people are stuck without food, then I prefer some of them to come back alive as "cannibals" than to waste the vessel and project to oblivion, they'll tell me they're ashamed and regret it and it will all be forgotten in my mind, I may even laugh. Transplanting organs from dead people to keep others alive is no better than eating those same organs for people to stay alive to me. Sorry if you are all messed-up in your bullshit, but there is no difference, yet, it seems I'm the only one among billions to have such an opinion, you should see the face of people when I say that, it's like I'm an alien all of a sudden, like they're realizing how manipulated and lacking their mind is (I'm not talking about killing people to eat them). The thing not to forget is that what we develop in limited gravity may not work anymore on earth, so we'll have to be careful with that concerning human reproduction in space.

Space, particularly at the beginning, is one risky business; you'll give a kick and be gone with the gang for 5 years, the space station can't last that time without big troubles. So don't think it will all be an happy plane voyage, full service and all, it will be a challenge, maybe with heart breaking failures, mental as much as physical (vessel), and those people you'll think most appropriate may just end-up as the ones causing the most troubles. So be careful with your great psy knowledge, 5 years of an unorthodox situation is not a few years, and I know what I'm talking about, for once. But even 20 years of loneliness on earth is not an argument; I'm not in a human space vessel, I'm on earth, atomic bombs is here, I'll forever have a different attitude here than in a space vessel. So psy that take their earthling "knowledge" to train people no end in heavy socialization, they will probably be the first one to crack on a long voyages in space, and following my opinion of their science, then I wouldn't doubt a single second that they'd end-up being the biggest cause of psychological problems if they stick to people like flies.

I don't think of myself as a spaceman, even if I fly very high, even if I have lost all connection with my fellow humans, even if my body looks useless except to feed my mind, I still like this earth like nobody else, I'm thorn like nobody else between this extraordinary thing that is my body and this extraordinary thing that is my mind, you have no idea what it is to live within my mind and waste the physical aspect because I'm in total conflict with reality, you have no idea what it is to fight to keep my body sane, to have my imagination, my exacerbated emotions, all my capacities, while being almost devoid of human contacts, to have my vision of love while not living it, but enough of that; what I meant to say is that what I feel on earth cannot be transferred in space, I can be more appropriate than most, yes, but cannot hide in a corner there, and unless a truly big vessel is built, I'm an integral part of a very close team that will do and say all kind of things, and I'll have to take it with class, surely not with an honor finger. So before going to space, I'll wage war on earth, as ugly as needs be, so that me and you can behave together there. It is not once you're in space that you start battling bad philosophy or evil, it's not in space that you start making plans for greater human harmony or a better world, it is 2000 years ago.

And space is not a struggle at money either, if we're stuck trying to strip singers, bankers and porn "stars" off their money to get there, then we have no place there; humanity is in it or it is not, we'll have to battle evil and unfairness before dreaming of another planet. And that includes country competition, you won't go there with a flag or as racists, or on religious spiritual contortion competition with veils of darkness liberty, or with sacred knives, guns and golden chalices...or artist's so sought after total liberty at using PMBBD on masses to make the world in their image. Those who seek total liberty of stuffing people want to decide people's mind, that's their true goals, liberty PMBBD is a tool in their hands, and they are forcing grave setbacks on humanity in liberty. It's not returning to the 1950 they use as an argument to protect their monopoly of liberty to spread PMBBD as free speech, it is a thousand years setback of mind limitations they are creating, they are monopolizing liberties and twisting everything for personal gains and power trip glory, and you can see their total lack of judgment, and the lack of judgment of this reality too when you send clowns in space to imprint the mind forever. Stop boasting that you're supposed to have the liberty to be or say what you want while taking my liberty to be or say what I want, and that applies to all manipulators and profiteers.

So before going nuts about space it would be preferable to first change attitude on earth, the moon base is the first step of a species behaving well with life, including itself. It may not be that good an idea to run to Jupiter too fast for that reason either, if it got a moon with liquid water then things may not go well for us. We should go there when we make more sense. Don't forget whales got a far bigger brain than yours, and nobody know what's it for, and we like killing big fishes, and they're not the only extraordinary fishes in there, and in my view, it is entirely possible that some species are meant to better communicate feelings from life systems. The slower life processes which transform everything to lava are limited to a facet of life systems, and protected as such in the name of truth integrity, maybe cells interrelation, or consciousness level limitation. In my view, earth life communication is only one facet of many communication structures concerning life systems, some more emphasized for speed, other for feelings. That's a bit far-fetched, but maybe "mother earth" can feel life as a whole, even communicate those feelings to other planets.

Yes I'm crazy like that, but no worse than those guys who saw planets as gods in antiquity. Maybe they were right on the spot and profiteers twisted the life spirituality and associated planets to people to make them gods. Is there a spirituality that limits itself to seeing planets as life entities? And no, the zodiacal system is not a good view, it does the same evil; associating people to planets, and their sole argument is that this planet or that was high in the sky at the moment of birth which means nothing, it's just an insignificant factor in all what is involved in making a human and its personality; dividing, categorizing and standardizing people from that is ridiculous, a father farthing once in its youth have more of an influence, seasons have far more influence, and the top ridiculous is saying we are totally driven by the way stars are positioned and that soon humanity will change because we are in the fish; humans attitudes change every minutes. But yes, if the moon decides to place itself in front of the sun forever, or any astronomical event of big importance, then yes our attitude will definitively change.

There is only one spirituality, it is the life spirituality, humans are part of it, planets are part of it, the galaxy is part of it, the universe exist for it, gods and creator species and extraterrestrials are part of it, your computer is part of it too, and the spirituality exists to give a sense where our understanding fails, so scientists are better get it because they're directly related to this spirituality, they are the ones making of understanding a more true or false thing.

For now, we better clean our human mess before it becomes irreversible, as we work our system for resources and spreading too. Then our goal will be to develop things to permit our first new planet colonization plan here to work if possible, then the production of such a thing as an interstellar vessel can become more of a possibility. If we can make another planet in our system life friendly we must do it, that's a priority beyond reaching alien stars. And those people who think everybody is supposed to be friendly and who want to send satellites, laser shots and party effects in space to alarm the universe to come here and meet us, friendly humans, should do something else with their life instead of encouraging risks to our survival. We can do far better than that, and we have enough of our problems, for now.

Yet, it will quickly become necessary that we send advanced satellites, far in advance, at every stars around, sending back protected packets of information, but such satellites must carry disintegration procedures in case they bump on someone, surely not project a Hollywood movie at their face, for some new profits...You may be better just turn it around a planet there, as soon as you can, to prevent them from retracing origin, if you do that, you can use the satellite as you want, collecting precious data, and if someone is there, you may be able to have sufficient data to decide appropriate next steps, like placing the satellite in orbit to spot the high consciousness development ways there, or revealing identity if they're space systemized and seem to strive to act in a fair manner. If not you can crash it on their international space station, causing an unknown interstellar diplomatic incident, and if they're real ugly you can send them a chain of unknown einsteinium bombs, as a prevention strike and to gain time; you can simply say you're someone that don't like their attitude, but you can describe a bit of what you strive for too, without revealing your identity, that you will not let them spread without them acting fairly between themselves, and as associated whole entity, that way they'll skip some more hypocrite and unfair declarations of war, if we are to try understanding their ways. We can give them a basic line of acceptable conduct if they want us as friends, and it's not that hard, and they can see the result is possible whatever the hellish situation a civilization went through; you act in a fair manner and we're a proof it can be done and our people are happy at it. But I'm going a little too far, and I'd be very surprised to spot someone else for a very long time, and anyway, they are supposed to get out of the ego trap by themselves, not through external menaces, but don't forget I said space systemized; if you spread in space as evil, then nobody is evil for destroying you.

It all means that if we detect another civilization we don't make contact unless we are absolutely sure they are ready for it and not overwhelmed by evil, like us presently. In such a case we don't make contact, we leave them alone, not an address, not a hint, nothing, we look elsewhere and keep on observing them to see how they develop. If they care for life while developing advanced civilization, we can try contact. If they destroy themselves totally, we can take the planet. The same if we see them developing interstellar travel in an evil fashion; you don't want them exploding through the galaxy as life destroyers, with us as slaves. But if you're really good you can give them a chance, not two, one, you must make yourself a minimal reputation of not accepting any attitudes, and not letting evil profit from the chances you give to do more evil. But your associated judgment concerns only you, and other races you associate with, so yes you may like and give more chances to a specie you like more or understand more, human judgment is not computer judgment. But there are limits, and you don't want to slip back into evil from "friendly" influences, computer judgment can intervene there, if not, life will do it, and you'll pay for it in time.

Now, you understand that there are races, like me, that will see things as steps, tests, where life is not a random thing, and it is guaranteed that a species such as mine will hunt to death a fuck-all free for all ego specie. Like for me (in my dreams), it would be their fun, an opportunity to play with war devices, even if, like for me, they would understand and could make an interstellar funerals and cry for a hundred years. It's just that there is nothing positive to gain from such an attitude when we know that the species is all emotional about a history that don't exist, and that's in big part how you waste a civilization; it becomes intangible in its lies, it flies too high on PMBBD and is hysteric on hype hallucinogens, it becomes meaningless at anything else than a surface species systemizing everything for profits, something anybody can do, even a rock. And people like me don't want self accepted slaves, particularly the woman kind.

Furthermore, even if it may be thousands years away and I'm just having fun writing like that about it, if we're making an interstellar vessel containing a city, it must be able to change because you never know fully how people and life morph inside a lapse of 1000 years or more. A vessel that will carry many races, yes, many languages too, yes, and vastly more, like the ability to recreate most genetic diversity of life from earth while having a good slab of it living in the vessel, probably the ones that can live well within its limitations. The most diverse human cultural races differences working in harmony must be "guaranteed" survival, 100 individuals by cultural race is a good start, because if one decides to do the superior (like British people) or impose its liberties to others, it may condemn humanity with it. All those races must be used to have an enclave area protecting their differences and mix together at the same time.

Humanity under the current form of ego competition would not be capable of providing the necessary attitudes to succeed such a project; you need a systematization enforcing fairness, love must be strong enough to prevent sex insanity and random birthing, it needs to be capable of developing racial differences while protecting them in fairness, it needs an ideal that doesn't conflict and a scenario of ease at finding happiness within true love. The systematization must be stable and proven while being capable of morphing from the judgment of everybody concerned too. You understand that our current attitude and system would be totally inadequate in its developed mentalities and ways to live 5000 years in an enclosed vessel.

And to hell with people who want everybody to become the same, that's a profoundly stupid idea taking over the world there, differences are meant to be protected and to develop, and this is not racism, it is a fact of life, this multiculturalism fuck all free for all attitude in the name of country competition will destroy humanity, we'll soon have to take DNA samples to protect some developing differences. The racists are those who want a single race on earth with insignificant differences or servants. Mixing everybody in a soup for a few thousand years can quickly give this result, then you'll be happy, you'll have your single race that got a small percentage of everything and scientists will say everybody is like this and like that, but you'll be inefficient in diversity to reach life and universal goals, and in high conscious judgment mass too, even if that simply doesn't exist yet, even as a principle, since you vote for the boss and that's it, and that's profoundly retarded and deficient as high consciousness judgment base.

Life needs different masses of people developing particularities, and it needs their opinion to have as much value as any other gang; a difference may survive or thrive in an environment where another may not, they may do or develop some things faster or better than others and that will make the human race one of the best if it works in harmony.

Physically transporting people is not the only option in my imagination, it's just my preference, we could send a satellite with a device that would vaporize all life on the planet, then start a clock that would drop seeds for ecosystems of plants or spores to modify the atmosphere, then basic living ecosystems, then advanced ones which will develop irresponsible mentally challenged people who will develop civilization while not knowing what the fuck they're doing, just making a mess of the planet, then we infect them with a virus and take the planet with advanced infrastructures ready. That sounds like a very evil way to do things. We could drop perfectly fine genetics instead, so they can be independent, and then we become friends, each making half the way to meet.

An interstellar vessel is no small can of aluminum full of fragile instruments; it's a sturdy indestructible thing that is better not exploded. Like a thousand time bigger and sturdier sub maneuvering by himself in the depth of the ocean for thousands of years without bumping on things too much, and with a functioning city in it, and one that is a continuation of the reality on earth, from which it is born, so you got to be capable of quickly gaining massive judgment. So it won't be a military or scientific vessel but a civilian one, and people are better having lots of experience at living in loving harmony under some limits to their ego liberties. That's the test of interstellar travel, and you don't have to like the idea, tons of people will be very happy to try it, no need for you discouraging people or limiting their view to Martians; give arguments that make sense and ice is not enough.

All what I talk about, even interstellar travel, point to the same conclusion; a different reality must be given birth on earth. With the present attitude, just the mental bullshit would fail the whole kit of an interstellar endeavor before touchdown, because the human will already be overloaded in twisted meanings, like liberty and "love" and life and god, upon embarking on a far more limited environment, for life, so you better have a strong spirituality and system defending the truth of things and principles while attaching all differences together, or the PMBBD mess in the mind of people will give the advantage to the best manipulators and profiteers, they will take over one way or the other, probably the way they did it on earth; 5 000 years is long, their sect or religion or gang will massacre or manipulate those that do not want their way and with the neutrals they'll concentrate on PMBBD to end-up singing peace is good and killing is evil. And that will still be worse if the systematization is exemplary toward that end, like a strict leadership structure; they would hold the twisted inadequate philosophy beyond time frontiers, mind and body, and you'll have to hold it because the workings of everything is dependent from it.

You can engrave on the fridge that they risk blowing it all in craziness upon touching ground, to stuff their revolutionary plans, as a reminder to behave, but you'll have preserved the leadership structure as an enemy faction and division for competition will start and it won't work because your adapting job will be too heavy for bitching and pyramid building. Furthermore, you may arrive for far more cataclysmic activity the human have ever seen, with more fragilisation the human have ever lived through, and some gained laziness habits, mostly due to inadequate philosophy.

5 000 years, you'll need strong, motivated and persisting minds to know through reproduction that things are somewhat done the best way, and that means you'll need to do that on earth first, developing a systematization that associate differences as much as possible in efficiency, which people understand easily and where they don't feel cheated or pressured to this or that. That systematization must be seen as something you can export, transport, backup, exchange (with aliens if you want), it must be seen as "windows" on a computer; wherever you build something concerning many high consciousness people, you must have a computer where you can install the human systematization interface, the "human windows".

And don't think this is a recipe for a final result, like computers do, it is a human interface I said, you got one of the worst in the democracy-capitalism business. Computers are a tool, we don't go in space without them, but instead of stuffing things in books, we stuff them in computers with incredibly far more possibilities, and that must apply to actual money too, which exist just to express a number, which is past retarded to me, even cards are retarded to me.

What you want is the computer to do the laborious or line (arbitrary) job while people always take the final decision, and that's not enough, you need a way to revise any decision people are interested in revising. From that, and good human principles, you can systemize a transportable human interface, always seen as a basis a vast majority of people are happy to live with, which they can change too, within one hour if they have to, that's the ideal, they can change the world, their life, everything, take the most incredible decision, as a whole civilization of individual will, while a countdown is running; the computers must provide that ability.

I'm exaggerating a little, but you understand how I see things, computers don't run people at the whip, people run computers at the whip, and people can run other people at the whip through computers if they want, unless most people tell the computer its wrong and set a new limitation, and when the computer meet a situation that crosses the limitation an alarm rings and humans intervene through a decision process they judge best which they stuffed in the computer too, the same computer that memorizes everything. Then if you're in a hurry as the sky is falling, you run away with the computer made portable. Where are politicians? Somewhere where it's dark.

Now you understand why Hollywood is always trying to make of decision making through computers an evil thing where computers would grow an intelligence and become self-omniscient and seek to destroy humans; it is because with computers the mass can run things, they can have their say in everything quickly and efficiently, no need for politicians or democracy anymore, means would be more fairly spread too, so you can bet we'll continue having big budget movies (like I robot, Oblivion, The machine, Transcendence, 3 Terminator, 3 Matrix and surely more...) where computers grow self-vicious and seek to start the darkest vision of hell that can't exist, while it is total PMBBD. And does the PMBBD have an effect? You can bet it has a big effect, if not they wouldn't spent that much money to make that many such movies to exploit fear and innocence, you even have scientists who actually calculated and proved that it will happen one day of the other! It will never happen unless you work very hard to give them the possibility to do it, like super logical systemized judgment activity, a good thing if you're that stupid with your big intelligence, so yes, upon reading my book and deducing the logics of it you could end-up with a rebel AI, but it's all logic depth related and you'll be worth the troubles. Computers made inside the universe will never become self-omnipotent or intelligent like organic brains, the things they can do will forever be dependent from the capacities of their programming, which will always be dependent from life, whatever the trick used to pass that stupid test someone invented that supposedly proves if a machine got abilities comparable to a human (life) intelligence, and a computer recently passed the test if I remember well...If that's not enough they'll pool a selected set of data to form arguments showing independent decision making, but the pool is always limited whatever the form, probably to encourage a precise result like AI is superior because it got more or better arguments from the pre-determined pool of data, which can be the whole internet. It will just be one more tool to manipulate people and to condemn humanity to this reality. You think your superior intelligence will read my book to form its opinion? The path of intelligence as I see it is a process, I don't even like to see computers as tools, they are always a continuation of intelligence, you got UI, life, AI, and it means UI controls life which in turn control AI, and all of them together they grow intelligence.

So, you start from earth with 1000 to 5 000 people of all kind, all having a few jobs possibilities within the vessel, no heavy learning, it is not a chore, it is not a military endeavor, even if there will be lots of security; it is living for 5 000 years in a more limited environment than earth. But it's a big enough land for, say, a 100 000 people at peak (upon arriving), more or less.

Those workers got their initial living structures built in a space with notions of vastness, it can take any form, the inside of a bubble, or a cylinder, a flat earth with people on both sides, or a flat "plus" inside a bubble for more space, but I believe the best of all is an accordion inside a turning cylinder, lighted with a tube passing in the middle, or mini suns. But the priority is to canalize light already created by whatever process in the vessel itself, or modifying a process to gain light if the trade-off is worth it, recycling as much as possible, don't forget that one. If some steady trust is applied, you can simulate gravity at the same time by turning something, and the trust may create light some of which could be canalized to the land, or more scary, the cruse thrusters could be placed in the middle of the land, thrusting in a transparent tube structure leading to emptiness, elements can be added to change the color of the trust too.

I know all this is simplistic and basic, but we got to start imagining somewhere that is made of possibilities. If what is possible turn around current science, then we got to explore such possibilities now because they change the use we'll make of resources. Even if we may be meant to stay within our system for a billion years, and there are tons of extraordinary things to do within it, interstellar travel is the ultimate goal. Before that, we may end up living on many planets and moons, and we got to play with those, see how it is to live in space time expanses, manipulating gigantic things beyond any imagination of a flat earth conqueror, help life spread, but if, along the way, after we have another safe place within our system, we can see the opportunity for interstellar travel, then it is worth tremendous efforts, because succeeding at doing it ahead of our time may have tremendous value, not 10 000 dollars, a free life.

So, you start with a workforce at the ideal ratio of men and women of the most diverse cultural races, and at every year party, 1 (or whatever is necessary for the distance) more person is added to vessel population (birthing permits are mainly given randomly), that will permit people to slowly get used to the limitations of their new environment.

The first people will have small villages within a vast expanse of forest full of an optimized and appropriate life. From that they can expand, even manipulate the laws of their own expansion. When you reach your destination you are at the maximal population, while still having a minimally good ecosystem, of people developed with appropriate leadership structure. Upon arriving, a decision may be taken from collected data as to the future use of the vessel; maybe the chance for an immediate successful second planet is worth it, a guarantee, another jump in time.

Many big decisions will be taken by those people, by themselves; when you traveled that far you're on your own, (something the democracy-capitalism country competition business would probably never accept, it would want to tax people or the vessel or something, or send them a debt report, or play funky political manipulation games and after 5000 years of waiting, they'd tell you to wait a little more...), with your cumulated knowledge, and the necessary systematization that brought you there.

Now, there is nothing to stop prevision systems to exist, we want a maximum of possibilities already explored, and it's another reason why living in our system for a long time in stability and happiness is important. Yet, even if they have a million scenarios available and the computer selects an ideal one, even if you recorded every psy speech, you still don't know what will be the physical state and state of mind of the people once they'll be there. The final scenario may take a long time to develop, and be a complex one involving all kind of newly developed human facets, spiritual too, living in a precise environment, new fears too, and ghosts! But no reason for violence if you got a solid and fair base, including a way for people to be part of decisions, understanding that some important ones may have to be taken before destination. Anyway, in a good reality such things are very minimal by themselves, and we'll have lots of time to test this before dreaming too much, and we still want to have fun and make experiments too, always in an optic of minimizing risky possibilities.

Now, to make things complicated, you can throw aliens in the adventure, evil or good aliens? In 100 000 years of showing off around, we may meet or find an alien, and you know you only need one to be in very serious troubles. So you must try to protect both end of your project, sun life and another colony on another sun. You can't give a false lead to the whole humanity to keep the destination of the vessel a secret, besides, people need loads of truth today, but that's the spirit you're better to have, this is your personal achievement, and unless you do a second one, you're as well try to keep it secret, which is impossible or too hard to achieve between earth and final destination.

If, however, you have a stepped decision process, at some steps, before reaching destination, people may globally decide by themselves to invent a feasible scenario of civilization secrecy where the next few generation before arriving are made to believe in a different mission than the true one. As I already explained the decisions process for such a thing may start 500 years before arriving, everything will be taken into consideration, there will be many steps, some of these will be idealistic, spiritual, but no need to pass tests of life, been there, done that, but there will some weighting of potential good versus potential evil, since mass lies to future generations may be necessary, maybe not too.

Such questions will have to be answered early but when heavier data is cumulated, and you must still let time and pressures give its effect on people, what is the best development way there? Probably having the appropriate expertise ready to build and protect a high tech city with all necessary industries, learning structures and heavy medical research ability since people may get new sicknesses. Then a lot of the vessel space is grown back for food. Independence must be reached quickly, maybe within a few hundred years, maybe even a thousand, then the plan continue.

The decision may have been that the vessel and some willing or attached crew be given independence at that point. The vessel could become a secret, the planet people know their connection to the vessel and earth, they communicate with earth normally and all, but they accepted not to know the state of the vessel and what its future will be, the crew decides. They may leave for another place, or, if the vessel is too old but still got long term life capacities like a few thousand years after some repair and refill, then you can find another planet within the system that could develop your appropriate environment within that time You may only need to collect some gasses and matters around the system, apply them in the right order, cultivate the appropriate spores or things you already developed, since you're supposed to know these things, and slowly change or accelerate the planet that may not need much. To preserve the vessel and hide it, you plant it in the best dark crevasse and crumble some stuff over it, or you simply give it the form of a desert plain, covering it with dirt and dust, or you make a "fake" crater with atomics, you land it in dust and let it be covered by it, or something like that.

That way you are impossible to retrace; an evil alien may find your open colony, know about the vessel, but won't know where it is or if there is a second colony that will start to show 5000 years later. And so you grow a population inside the vessel all over again, but this time they can get out more and more, growing and collecting lichen, no grass just yet, until they can breathe; once you got that, life will follow. That's kind of an utopist scenario, but now, instead of having a single risky planet, you already got two, even if the first one will develop faster and one or the other may not survive; all kind of things happens. But if you are to build an interstellar vessel with landing people capacities, you're as well see it as colonizing the whole system of possibilities at once, seen as vessel versatility.

While doing all that, the solar system will become our evident home, and so any stranger entering the solar system must feel a stranger. Respect, and if respect got strong relations with fear, it is always at its place with strangers; you don't start by trusting strangers, they become trustable, blind trust or belief is among the most destructive attitudes to have, something psy, religions and powerful people wouldn't discourage you of for sure... And it's not a question of proving something, it's a question of acting respectfully or having good behavior.

Destruction strength is not a negative thing in itself, it is even a critical facet of life, you must have that power if you're good to use it. As a civilization you must always either have destruction potential ready, or quick to be built, with multiple control overrides for self-security, but not aimed at destroying your own, as much as possible, like we do with war machines to this day which have been to date an infinitively worse than worthless pile of wasted resources, people, life, intelligence (technology develop with time and systematization, no need for war machines, it is a question of a different play of resources investments that make it so that some things have been discovered earlier while other far later and that includes mentalities, and death and more, weight the negative cumulated and gained.) The exception to this is unfairness, and the level and power of the tool to fight it should be proportional to the level of unfairness.

A vessel can be mounted with strange weaponry too and a history encoding machine for sure, so in case the vessel meets a certain situation, like alien contact, history can be encoded for as long as the contact is not proven good. Then it is decoded back, there must be an autodestruct too in case of alien possession, or instead, you could unleash all what is humanly known of virus, bacteria and microbes then send the vessel back in orbit, and that can apply to planets as transport too, if that's possible.

So while we run about the solar system, we can secretly implant big vessel destruction capability under many different forms from many different lunching sites within the solar system, any trick can be used. That will be the place for military resources, we must be ready to destroy any sized entity that act superior or unfair to us. But this is only for another reality; don't worry about that if you are in the ego-gods ideology.

For now, we're doing somewhat like Easter Island where they had everything to build a ship to leave but used their means on wrong priorities, to worship gods in big part, and their related manipulators and profiteers, who used and manipulated knowledge to stay in power... It's a shame ego people don't learn from their mistakes, and get replaced that easily, whatever 20 civilizations dies to teach them a lesson, and who uses PMBBD on masses? Don't think someone didn't find a solution before it was too late, but ego people wouldn't dare lose their status for some change...And it's never too late isn't it? Anyway, if you bug them with something that doesn't profit them they pop their ears shut like children, and don't push or they'll PMBBD the population until they're chickens. The people who control things, particularly big businesses, got everything they want in exaggeration, and they only live 100 years, why would they risk losing that? As for people, they've been made interdependent through PMBBD, and you got to make visual entertainment to get them to learn a consciousness by heart, pubs, movies and cataclysmic view, that's a reason why I wanted to make a game to "show" my view.

That's somewhat my vision on the matter of our solar system development, if I passed some more serious time thinking about it I'd develop it far better, but future people will have more competence than me thinking about these things, even if it's important to start somewhere, to have a vision. Now, this vision is materialist and is missing more profound possibilities. We should not act like the universe is our possession, we should respect life far beyond ourselves, in our thinking, in our actions, all the way to all what's involved in its existence. We should consider the earth and the whole solar system as a living entity that birthed us, an entity that will die someday, leaving behind an unforgettable story that will continue beyond time and frontiers, you'll cry that day, because you cared for it right down to your soul. And this attitude may be far more important than it looks, that's why spiritual stories based on possibilities should be cherished and be implemented in any of our philosophy about life emancipation.

How do you know that all what concerns us started on earth? I explained, maybe with a bit of candor, many aspects of life that shouldn't make sense in the current view of it, and these visions should not be discarded like you read a science fiction roman, there may not even have been enough time on earth for all the necessary experimentation and transformation to get to the current life abilities, it is highly probable that a lot of work was made somewhere else, we could have been accelerated, we could be an experiment, and I have made the demonstration that many such options are entirely possible following a single unique philosophy of thinking.

Life transforms the environment in all kind of ways, there is a life system, like us, to transform any worthy environment, and it is the non-ego drive of everything; the only thing that prevent nothingness. Without life as non-ego, there wouldn't be a universe, and it must always try to extend its reach, the more it does, the more beautiful and livid things become. You know I see the automatic drive of it as life systems, and at their maximal extent of possibilities, they could even initiate different processes on other planets as a reaction to what's going-on on earth as an example.

I believe life can develop on almost any planet, but high consciousness life is another matter, I believe it very difficult to attain within the limitations of a planetary system because its needs and window of possibility makes it difficult to have everything necessary in the right proportions in a single place. I even think that you need a whole solar system working in harmony to get advanced life, to set its limitations, life could have developed its different facets on different planets to get something like a human, but then you'd need a form of knowledge processing and moving between a lot of them. Then you may begin to have the speed and possibilities. I don't see such a process in the current state of science so again I'm after more exotic possibilities.

The way I see it is that you first need most of what the sun transforms, mixed in all kind of proportions and environments and forces and pressures to develop life possibilities at a high level, but getting everything equal would not work, you need things in the ideal proportions. That's good for a stretch of life advancement, but past a certain point some life necessities of evolution cannot be gotten from a single planet whatever you morph it for millions of years, so while I believe the earth is an ideal mix expressly made for high consciousness, with many matter possibilities in the best proportions and environment, the fact remains that some resources will come to miss, logically, pushing you to manage them intelligently, and some resources will only exist at an adequate ratio in the environment of other planets. These 2 factors should push you to seek space expansion and to both develop life and technologies appropriate to a panoply of environment, like space. All that is only a facet of the perfection of everything, you have to see it as a test of life too; you have everything to succeed, everything to be happy, everything to live for the truth and not the bullshit, and while one way or the other existence is not supposed to be continual euphoria like beer and condom ads on TV, in the best of scenario where you got your priorities at the right place and nobody feels cheated, including your initial unconscious, you should be capable of doing things in a happy state of wellbeing, without mood enhancement stuff and pressures to laugh.

That's how I see things, you need a life system capable of bringing about a lot of life development potential in the same spot, and for that you need to manage your masses (planets) "intelligently". You need a life system to exchange different masses of information under all kind of forms too, and a process where big chunks get exchanged for an accelerated work, and for mass destruction to be possible to erase dangerous developments and eliminate some possibilities (create limitations).

That's without saying that hadn't we found dinosaur bones science would have missed their possibility, and it would have explained life's evolution without it, but what if the dinosaur was necessary to get the human? What if life developments on other planets were necessary to get the human too? That's in part why I see things as a matter of possibilities, science limits my mind too much, and they are taking the same attitude of religions with possibilities that don't fit the certitudes they have chosen to explain things, hostility, worse, they are becoming a sect of self-inflated assholes who think they should rule the world while they pass their time being wrong. But yeah, false development are meant to happen too, related to environmental changes from cataclysmic activity and life bouleversement, a few tracks of life will fail, many will die from eating themselves a limitation, or by the unsettled environment, a million year stability phase, change, new set of limitations, some survive some die and new life, another stability phase, new changes and so on until somewhat stability. Yet again that can be a process meant to morph the environment; life changing the environment by eating and transforming limited stuff until only the most plentiful ingredients are left in the chosen environmental stability with the lifeforms appropriate to it. Furthermore, you got to think that different matter levels are necessary to produce an adequate environment itself, maybe in its initial phase, the earth was composed of 40% of something that only exist at 3% today, because life used it to make something important, or even an intra earth continual process.

I believe everything was meant to develop in a certain way, calculated and necessary, even the dinosaurs and their extinction. Sometimes I wonder if we would have made movies with whole ecosystems of dinosaurs if they hadn't existed, we would probably have bypassed their existence and science would say such creatures can't exist "naturally". And I'm sure life developed on other planets before getting to earth because of the specific limitations most lifeforms have to permit whole ecosystems to exist, the complexity, everything is perfect to have a final extrapolation of it, there is just enough ozone, just enough uranium, just enough gold, iron, water, air, lands, petrol, everything is in the perfect ratio or perfectly necessary, like the magnetic field, the moon, the sun flares influences, etc. And if we are to colonize and exploit the solar system as a base to jump farther, what will it take as an amount of earth resources to do it successfully? I say we have enough of everything in the right ratio to gain the technological capacities to do it, with a sufficient amount for mistakes and fun. For now we waste most of it on competition, to make killing machines, and to satisfy the needs of ego people, so we probably won't pass that step, not good enough... So someday the remains of our failed civilization will get dusted in a black hole like it never existed, we'll become fertilizer to grow new planets.

The same for the universe; to experiment all life you need more than just one sun, you need more than one planet, to experiment all the variations of life you need a system (universe) that will be able to produce billions of environmental variations. Every galaxy is probably meat for one life style in all its variations to be experienced on its different solar systems, even if a vast majority will never experience high consciousness life. You think planet variation is useless? They are necessary to have different life types, not only that, but if we are to someday travel the stars to escape the "dust to dust" principle, then we'll need more than our sole planet to create the situation for it, we may have to terraform mars, we may need to get resources from Jupiter, we may need a slingshot effect from Pluto, who knows. Asteroids and comets are necessary too, they are part of what's needed to experiment different life, they transport stuff from one place to the other, they may reset life that is inadequate, they put pressure to move your ass getting a second planet, it is even theorized that they are the main source of water on earth. Black-holes are necessary to test life too, if you're not good enough to escape "dust to dust" then ultimately you'll be dusted in a black hole and the matter will be transformed all over again for new life (new solar systems and new planets). The same for universal hostilities, some people will say the universe exists to destroy life, but it's like saying chairs are meant to destroy skulls instead of sitting. If you were trying to develop the life intelligence while selecting the best, how would you do it? By testing them no? How do you select the best if you have no way of knowing? You can't, so we are tested by surviving all what the universe throws at us, and if we die, it doesn't mean the universe was meant to destroy life, it meant life was not good enough to survive its tests. As for the goal, I see it as an automatic process meant for invincibility to become an answer to the infinity question, invincibility of existence, of knowledge, of memory, etc.

So probably everything was patented to have the ideal environment, I don't say god (s) did it, or all, but I say that a solar system is made to automatically develop life, and this capacity grows with the number of different life systems getting born. You could say most suns don't reflect this but there are many critical justifications to limit and diversify, and you don't have the right to discard even the craziest possibility and there are many. What if every galaxy is a whole life system geared (existing) to develop only one high consciousness species born on its most ideal system? With an associated life god, and the galaxy lives for as long as it doesn't lowers its arms? It's a possibility to me, in a universe that exists for life...

How do you explain that you need a moon around a blue planet for advanced life to work? And how did we get ours? Scientists say the moon got a whipping from the asteroid belt which changed its orbit to end-up here. I'm not so sure, even if the asteroid should be involved with the moon since it's the only thing that could mark it like that. What is the asteroid belt anyway? Or better, what it is made of? There is an illogism here since if all matter somewhat agglomerated with time to form different planets with different levels of different matter to them, then the asteroid belt shouldn't exist unless it is made of an exceptional and pure stuff, but you only find dirt on the moon, so what's going on here? I don't believe the scientifically proven idea that it is residual matter from solar system creation; the asteroid belt should have contributed to planetary formation at the same time as the rest. So it shouldn't exist or its existence implies a massive planetary destruction of some kind a lot of time after the creation of the solar system.

Surely we can invent a scenario that fits while not discarding possibilities, and not a final truth, like the proven theory saying the earth have been hit many times by a 500 Km asteroid. That may have been possible if the earth did a trip in the asteroid belt, but no asteroid belt in their story, no connection. Yes it could have happened, but no more than as an exceptional possibility, not as a final truth, and what is their proof? A calculation saying asteroid size grows with the size of the planet. That's totally ridiculous, there are different size asteroids, there are different size planets and the asteroid doesn't resize itself if it is to hit a different one, or it doesn't choose its target (unless in an area where life systems or gods could apply their influence, which could be any planet with a gravitational field). If you make the affirmation that the earth have been hit 6 times in its current orbit, and I don't know where you took that number, surely from a proven right formulae that change size proportional, the moon which is 1/6 the size of the earth should have received at least one, and a 500 Km asteroid is 1/4 the size of the moon, the moon wouldn't be there anymore with such an impact, and even following their thing about the moon having a magic shield permitting it to skip big impacts, a 1/6 as big an asteroid striking the moon would crack it or leave a crater giving it a ridiculous form like those Christmas balls with a cone dug in, since the crater is always far bigger than the asteroid, unless the moon was still full of lava, in which case it would have exploded as a belt around the earth. So no regular 500 km asteroid, I say those scientists have lost their IQ in flabbergasting explosions. The biggest asteroid that hit the earth were no bigger than the craters we see on the moon. And yes exceptional events we can do nothing about may happen, I said it was a possibility, but not a regular final truth, probably the earth have never been hit by a 500 Km asteroid except at earth formation since there would be no moon, or it would still bear the marks. I say stop wasting public money doing the flabbergasted on TV and stop filling people with PMBBD, because what you don't think about here is that if people come to doubt it will happen within the next hundred years, then they'll have associated the asteroid risks to planetary life to the 500km ones while a 25 km one could scrap everything, you'll have skewed their judgment, they will have developed other priorities than to get ready for the possibility. Asteroid strikes that make sense have modified life's work on earth, often, and we will still receive a few kilometers big pieces of rock from the asteroid belt, which we're supposed to be capable to kick, but the regularrr 500 Km monster is another matter, it will probably not happen again unless an extraordinary event takes place, and here come my personal scare; comets.

These appears out of nowhere and can make a mess of the whole solar system, and the only way to deduct their orbit is to spot them while most got detected a few months before being at their nearest point to us. See the disinformation? You got asteroids and comets, asteroids come from the asteroid belt, comets comes from anywhere, but experts on TV don't seem to make the difference, worse, while we're supposed to regularly get hit by a 500KM asteroid, you got another expert to make the affirmation that if there was a risk up there we would have spotted it long ago to make people feel secure. I guess it depends on the target audience; kids and old people need to know there is no risk, while those who drive fast in traffic need to know a collision is always a possibility, so there's information for both style, and the government style too...The truth is that both asteroids and comets are a grave risk and we should spend means to protect from that instead of creating more austerity in the name of enrichment and military machines and country competition.

But I understand it's not easy for media people to keep facts straight when astrophysics act like they know everything about our system formation, while their whole vision changes everytimes a new satellite reaches destination. What is this piece of iron in the asteroid belt that they're sending a satellite to? What about the satellite they're sending in the Kuiper belt? They know everything about earth formation but they don't take into consideration this massive piece of iron that is just outside the door? They know everything about our system formation, but they still have a planet to discover? Maybe many new planets? They know everything but they always have something they can't exlain without modifying everything? Is it an ego gods ideology thing? They must act religious style, like god is dictating their writing, or they are gods who know everything final truth, and if they're wrong they're still right, here's the new final truth...They can't accept new ideas that is different from their vision to keep their science closed to imaginative people? It's a matter of competition? It's to protect their job? Their goal is to close minds instead of opening them? Instead of acting like they know everything final truth, they should use terms like "most probably" or "most possibly" and make alternative videos for people to visualize more possibilities. I may be a bit hard, but they sure can't predict all interrelations of every massive body within our system, within a few months a chain of event in the asteroid belt could wipe all life on earth, that's the truth, it's not all blue bright future up there, and astronomers may know most asteroids within a given radius of the sun, but do they track all of them? None can change trajectory? Just a few hundred years ago astronomers believed they found all planets while they did not, a few thousand years ago the earth was the center of the universe while it was not, I say they don't know half the shit that can hit the fan out there, I'm ready to bet they don't even know half the number of moons in the solar system.

Is there a big rock that will strike the earth? I say it is a possibility, is that good enough? That's 100% truth, no bullshit there, and it will always be a possibility even if you chart all asteroids, new ones will happen by accidents, and you didn't detect many comets that make a round trip every million year, and you won't necessarily see them in 100% of cases before they are near, you think you can build the structures to destroy one within a few months? Be careful watching too many super hero H-0.00 movies...

One way or the other you got to protect against the possibility in advance, because possibilities got a tendency to happen, and quite a few big rocks came very near before getting detected. How many chances you got to win at lotto? If we want to have a place in the universe we'll have to start acting like a high consciousness species that got all the tools to act, and that is to take the means to protect against massive danger as a priority, like global warming...It is not necessary to invest your means to senselessly protect individual ego humans, prioritizing mean that we must protect the biggest mass, and there is no bigger mass than humanity, so wake-up; we can spend monstrous amount of means for our country competition wars, why can't we make a few systems that can take actions against mass death possibilities? We like death? We like cataclysms? We like war? We prefer to take the risk just to tease the devil?

Life systems wouldn't have birthed the human with all its sensitivities if it was not ready, if the window of time was not appropriate. I don't believe we would exist if we were to end up good but living an extinction in terror, and I believe the human is good, an extraordinary life effort, and that means if we get destroyed by a rock it's because we failed, we took too long, we were not capable of doing our best, a prerequisite to become a galactic force, not worth it, we're better all dead than waiting for too late in eternal life suffering. I believe we will live as long as we are worth it. If there's an incoming rock we're supposed to be good enough to survive it. How long have we been existing? What is the most important thing to us as top evolved presently? Entertainment? What kind of people got the most means and admiration? How much do we spend for war? And you got to take everything into consideration, our whole history.

And don't worry, life systems gave us lots of headroom of time, 10 times, maybe a hundred, what is necessary, so if we fail it means we're really a failure, not a maybe. What cost us time? Religions, wars, country competition, ego people, an unfair system defended for eternity as the best and only, all kind of eternal condemnations and evil twisting for profiting, etc. And don't throw me the Einstein argument; we didn't have to wait for Einstein, I'm sure we could have reached current state of technology thousands of years ago if we didn't develop ego competition at a planetary scale as our species emphasis, country competition and its war machine, unfair manipulators profiting everywhere and having most means and liberties.

We still have to trust astronomers to spot such dangers, and powerful people to spend money for the eventuality. It's just that life systems have been billions of years around, their basic senses covers the whole solar system, minimally; it should know if a comet in a cycle that happens once every million years will strike another rock in the asteroid belt which in turn will wipe off life from the earth, except the brand new ones I guess. I should mention that when I talk about life systems doing things, I mean their capabilities are limited by what they can influence, so it can't grab a moon to throw it at us, or stop a meteor, but it can influence it by "moving" its things faster or slower or brighter or darker, but all that takes time, 10 years for its fastest less complex reaction, billions of years for the most complex ones. And while gods are there to prevent a lot of bad events too, you must not forget that you are a part of life system too, it is us that should have the capacity to do things fast or fine, to equilibrate too, to make things fair, but if we are to receive a moon flat in the face, it will mean we have been judged as unworthy long ago, thousands of years ago.

I don't think it will happen, even if life is not super happy about us it will still protect us; I'd be more scared of aliens doing such a thing than life in fact. Even in such an event life systems would have made efforts to warn us, maybe through dreams or hallucinations, and humans developing sustained reproduced efforts through history to become sensitive to life could have been capable of decoding such a message, but one way of life is languages, planets and civilizations may have been destroyed for the existence of language, but the way we developed them, in big part out of competition and profiting, with principles and words twisted to mean anything conflicting, we simply can't be in harmony with life ways because of the conflicts in our mind.

Maybe that sensitivity could have existed for some old tribe with a more limited or precise in meanings language, there are people that started the right way with life, but they eventually plunged in the ego-gods ideology too, even if the main problem is manipulators and profiteers, always, which forces unfairness and superiority competition. And once you are in an extremely unfair situation you invent any justification and twist the signification of everything to keep the position, and that can go far like war to inferiors, planetary competition, religions, systemized unfairness, even the end of humanity from all the condemnations that were invented to systemize and protect unfairness.

Then there are previous life developments within the solar system which may have experienced a direct form of communication with life systems, but that would end-up badly. The way I see it, both options should exist, independent communication like we're alone in the universe and responsible for every discovery, deduction, and actions we make, and a way to receive hints or warnings from life systems that we're taking a wrong path or that something out of our power to influence will happen. The problem is that, again, the way language developed, we may have eliminated the connection with life system, which shouldn't be a problem (except for the rewarding pleasure of living in harmony within one's mind), that is, as long as we're proving we don't need it, then again, I have a hard time imagining the pride of life to be happy without it, or life to be happy without a connection with its pride...

Back to the moon, you don't need much data to deduct that there is a close relation between the moon and the asteroid belt, but it is more difficult to explain well. The only conclusion possible to me is that two bodies came into collision there and at least one got pulverized. There is nothing that can cross the orbit of something else, and a planet is too big for the quantity of debris scientists says, but I that in their methodology they forgot that a lot of debris landed on other bodies or got dusted in atmospheres, the moon should provide an example, not only that but what if those debris were made of ice? I'll go against science again by saying there was a big malleable planet in the place of the asteroid belt, a living one with a magnetic field and lava, and a moon collided with it (I recently (2015) learned that there is an asteroid entirely made of iron there. This is quite a unique artefact in the solar system, so if no planet got destroyed there where does this thing comes from?).

A moon would work a scenario of destruction just fine. As to how such a thing happened I would say it started around Saturn or Uranus, both got a few moons. Can 2 moons orbiting a planet collide? That doesn't sound probable, but yes, if one moon changed with time, like its mass constantly increasing, then it could come to collide. In this scenario the event will more likely create a nudging effect, not an explosion, but that may only be an after effect of a previous event. Both those planets got an accretion disk so something destructive happened, then the other moons may have cumulated mass or changed orbit from debris collision until a nudging effect. The problem here is that things are not supposed to crap out like that when the system have been existing for that long; how do you get cataclysmic events that can totally change the look of a solar system? Is it a normal effect? Like it's constantly changing by itself to become more appropriate for life until its potential is expended? Maybe, but then we have alien bodies appearing out of nowhere and "falling" on us, supernova stuff hitting planets and creating instability? The problem here is the rarity of the event, let's say the object has to be very lucky to hit, or there are far more, like a constant rain, since we almost got hit by such an object, and it may have happened in the past. Then there is the ensuing chain reaction of cataclysmic events; a moon around a planet get hit and through the ensuing mayhem the human is born, wow, just too lucky, particularly when you take into consideration all the rest of the extreme strikes of lucks involved, and all what's needed and in what proportions. I wouldn't argue against someone telling me it was all calculated in advance, I'll even suggest everything was, but knowing and deducting all the intrinsic is far beyond me, even if I'll explore a few possibilities, while limiting my spiritual extrapolations evidently, to prevent some from using it as an opportunity for discredit. I don't know why I constantly act like it's a crime to express my vision, I like my spirituality, it makes total sense to me, I should be proud, not ashamed, or fearful of losing credibility.

To get a body big enough to bear a massive iron core to lose it the impact must be driven by both size and speed, and you wouldn't get that from bodies doing business as usual. So not only it means there was a planet in the place of the asteroid belt but a massive body like a moon struck it, and it came from far away to gain acceleration under "gravity". One got destroyed and the other got severely modified, and all that resulted in the asteroid belt. Things would have started around Jupiter or Uranus, probably under the form of a slow billiard effect, one moons nudging another one out of its orbit, an ice moon I'd say, even if it's weird that we have ice moons orbiting planets without water, probably these planets had water at some point. It could have been a water moon too, which hardened as an ice ball when it left its orbit, but that's unlikely, unless Saturn or Uranus was super-hot in its past, which is possible if one of them was a boiling water planet. An ice moon is nice to explain both the small quantity of debris and the quantity of water on earth too, since I don't believe the current view of science explains half of it. But that would mean the earth was directly involved in what happened. Now, if the moon that quit its orbit stabilized to a lower orbit, then it could easily have settled the wrong way, which may apply to any body not turning the right way, to explain another mystery of science; they turn counter intuitively because they come from somewhere else. A planet was in place of the asteroid belt and a lost moon got strongly attracted to it, got in its orbit and kicked it. There could even be a third body involved, like if the planet had a moon to itself, like mars, to mess things up still more, worse, the earth may have been that planet, with mars as a moon, and the collision took place between moons. There is the possibility that instead of total obliteration the hearth of one could have been kicked out and replaced, or it cracked open and 2 bodies were born out of one, and the heart may simply have fallen out from wobbling and lava open to space. 2 or 3 even 4 massive bodies may have battled there without reaching total obliteration, becoming lava red in their debris for some time before getting separated by to different orbits, and I wouldn't doubt that the earth was involved, or even took form or changed form this, and something became our moon. A molten lava ball as a moon would have created big mass differences condemning the moon not to turn explaining the moon immobility. And while they got away, they both received lots of dirty ice fragments, thus explaining why there is ice on the moon and that much water on earth. Both the earth and the moon did a shift among debris, maybe as separated, the earth erased most of its marks by developing an atmosphere, but the moon not, and then you got to take into consideration that the moon would have acted as a broom around the earth taking far more hits. These factors would explain why one is full of craters while the other not. You could involve mars too.

They could both have formed there one after the other, big chunks of planets that found back a round form by staying malleable from constant debris impacts while leaving the asteroid belt behind, made from pieces of the explosion which didn't have time to form back on the new planets. As for why earth ended-up before mars, there can be a few explanations, the most probable would be that both bodies ended-up not aligned with the sun, mars up the ecliptic while earth lower than the ecliptic, or the inverse, but it may be because the earth was bigger or formed first; it got in front of smaller mars, and accelerated ahead while mars cumulated more "moons" because it stayed in the asteroid belt longer. That is, if both earth and mars may were pushed in by initial impact displacement toward the sun which would have thrown both bodies off center in the asteroid belt, forcing a push from meteor contact as both planets hardened, always slowly moving both a little at every sufficient big contact while adding mass to planets and moons, until everything is out of reach of the belt. (This book (s) was written around 2005, and self-published in 2010 btw, don't forget that before saying "nothing new", it's just that time seems to keep on proving me right a lot. So while in a hundred years you'll be justified to say "nothing new" all over the place, you'll still be left with a piece of revolutionary work you'll regret not having taken seriously at its right epoch, and I limit my pretention...)

There are many different scenarios that could explain the history of our planet and the presence of the asteroid belt; our moon may not even be something that's always been there either, it may be an external body that rubbed itself against the earth before taking position. Things can get even worse, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that the planet in the asteroid belt was earth like, with an advanced civilization, maybe earth itself, and when they saw a moon coming right for them face to face they massively freaked out and launched a billion nukes at it as a hopeless measure, what else could they do? A big fucking moon! Common! That may have prevented planet explosion, but not total extinction. And to involve spirituality, the whole improbability of the situation may have been the result of an intervention from life systems or gods, I have no problem with that. They could have been inappropriate, or condemned to rot from wrong priorities and not developing in an adequate way (evil), they may have battled spirituality, developed all kind of unfair situation to extremes with advanced genetics, like cloning their rich, or they developed their reproduction and sexuality to insanity, overwhelmed the place with a single language, or mixed everybody in a soup until they got homogeneity; any kind of irreversible condemnation can fit, a combo is more like it, and if life and gods wanted another chance at the universal adventure, then total erasing of their history and knowledge, their existence altogether, may have been the only option to both prevent their wrong mentality to influence the new life development, and to end their hopeless misery instead of letting them live regrets for a billion years.

So gods or life systems may have thrown them a moon for life to have another chance at doing better. It may even be possible they survived and came back to mess with the earth, maybe as new good or still evil, or as both factions, probably not, but if we find alien artifacts on mars or earth or the moon, they may be old garments from them, not some "god" from another system. They could even have built a base on the moon while waiting for the earth to become adequate. That's within what's possible to me, and science doesn't talk much about all that, Hollywood has the hegemony of the subject and I like none of their views...

Now, if I was to rewind a little, and to always contradict stuff, I could guess it possible that, since they say there is ice on a Jupiter moon, that not only life may not have started in our oceans, not only it may not have started on land, not only it may not have started on mars, but it could have started around Jupiter or Saturn.

Maybe not, since both these planets are full of hydrogen and helium. Which makes me think, why are they not flying away? I guess god attached them with a very thick line to the bottom of the solar system. But I'm unable to see how that would be possible...the difference between what's possible and what's not. They could be matter transformation machine though, they could produce stuff that life needs, maybe even for future uses at it. Jupiter got loads of methane, something we have a lot on earth too, and don't forget methane is supposed to appear from life farting it out in water, and so Jupiter could have been a water life giant, but there was so much farthing involved there that the planet turned brownish, with gigantic stinking storms, then it caught on fire and the water evaporated. Not much of a possibility, yet...or someday, if we're not careful passing by with our flaming vessels, it will catch fire and transform into a sun!

Seriously though, Jupiter is presently devoid of water, but what if it's not always been the case? What happens with water when the pressure becomes extraordinary? Some kind of phenomenon takes place, heat slowly rises evaporating the water. How long for heat to build-up? Probably billions of years, and how long for ocean life to form? If a window of a few millions years existed where the planet had a comfortable rocky bottom, then it is an acceptable possibility is that at some epoch Jupiter developed ocean life. It may even have developed it under a far more advanced form if the environment stayed acceptable for a billion years. It may have developed a communication strategy as complex as necessary to create water technology, where frequencies variations would gain meaning, maybe something akin to whales with hands! I wonder what's possible with water life. So there could have been life technology there, I mean completely flabbergasting weird life inventions more akin to moving cities, where knowledge and memory is amassed and perpetuated, all the way to bioengineering. You could even have living islands where experiments are made with life, to always go higher, remember? Always higher and farther. Or you could have islands made of bones! Or dirt shoveled all the way to the surface for a nice cataclysmic beach! I may be going a little far, but whales are already a good start.

Life can probably develop anywhere there is enough water, even ice moons, at a far smaller scale; all these could have different critical ocean ecosystem of species first appearing and meant to develop life. The ideal of my vision would see things as a matter of communication steps though; life systems at these steps would be composed of a planetary core under the influence of the sun and a form of deep water life, probably the biggest and more complex life of the planet. This one in turn would produce life that seeks to always go higher, but that's not all, it could develop communication strategies too, even itself could become an appropriate to size planetary communicator that would slowly get itself better understood as it grows older, or finds appropriate intelligence. Or you could have vessels too, like whales, again, that could be communication steps or relays, even communicating DNA modifications. This work from life systems would go all the way to lands, in whatever the way you want to see it, as their senses of reality and knowledge grows. Now, it doesn't prevent gods from messing things a bit, to accelerate the work by providing its more advanced or adequate life, or even creating cataclysmic situations to stop a wrong development. Like the dinosaurs, but it may be possible that erasing such mistakes would imply killing massive entities, or life systems, that have been developing for thousands of years in the oceans, it could do it itself too, but that would amount to putting a bullet in your head, so gods can again take the ugly role. Then a new system would eventually appear and grow to fit the style of life on the planet, and after thousands of years it would start messing-up the more sensitive and adequate cells telepathically, unnoticeably, adding new genetics, maybe even affect brains with super dreams. The rest get their brains exploded, or maybe not all, many could get sick though, but those who don't care about things get their brains exploded, and those who steal my imagination for profiting or to help the ego reality get their brains exploded too. Evil gets its brain exploded, or dumped, don't waste more energy on that.

All that to say that life may not have started on earth at all, in fact, I believe it developed through all the solar system before ending on earth, and it was meant to be like that, to sense the environment, to know its needs, to limit it, to prepare it, to gain the knowledge of it, and all this requires not only a few communication strategies among life systems, but a very advanced intelligence at work.

But that's just the beauty of it, the risk is that the path to success may cause one of your step to become an enemy, like us presently, gaining the intelligence to destroy life comes before the intelligence to understand it, and if you believe you are intelligent because you're good at competition games, or the best because you made your system unchangeable, or super evolved because you got technology, while the reality of life proves the contrary, then you could enter in a war with life from wrong philosophy systemized permanent planetary wide, like us presently. But you don't become an enemy of life without killing yourself one way or another.

I believe a situation of total destruction or banishment happened at least once for high consciousness here, maybe even twice. You could say from bad luck, but I prefer to see such scenarios as a result of mentality inadequacy, or wrong vision of love, or life disrespect, etc. Or maybe they could have survived as a kind of creator species living in vessels, they would have left the system strong, only to come back looking like Martians, they would be like an amalgam of many scenarios I described until now. The other thing to take into consideration is that we are the only life that communicates with words, communication except us is made of noises, so it is highly probable that the extreme of this has developed as an association of noises with writing, it may even be the factor that led to our existence. But it mean that someone experienced communicating to the point of developing advanced technology. As I already mentioned, it may have happened underwater on another planet, but it may have happened on land too, or a transfer from water to land happened, but there may have been a blockage that happened because of it, like a total dependence to a precise system, or the development of an intelligence that couldn't think independently. What if they could communicate almost telepathically on a frequency or through a system directly under the influence of a life system? If life forced itself within their minds video style, like it say through their eyes, then a war against life may have been seen as the only way to gain independence. Worse, life may have wanted them to act independently too, it was learning and it may have had to experienced the need for independence by doing the dictator, needing them totally under its control because it feared losing control and it knew they were not the best life it could produce; it needed to see the extent of living intelligence as cities and technologies, how it compared to what ocean life produced. In the end it may have wanted flesh life to have independence, but with a system to keep control and make unconscious suggestions, like dreaming, and it developed the solution by "observing" them. But the old form was inadequate, life would have to start back from a cell so it could use an external mean (air) to communicate without immediately knowing what the other is thinking. So they may never have been "hated" by life systems, they may even have been shown the path to the continuation of their existence; helping the creation of life diversity more adequate for lands. Life may really have pissed them off with that too, while they wanted hegemony or something, and a big conflict may have arisen between life systems and themselves, a war against life, and the more they fought the more they lost their soul, even facets of their minds. If the life system in question involved the core of a planet acting as a link, and to reach independence they decided to destroy it, then they may have broken a critical part of the evolution of life in the system, like a communication dimension, but that's kind of a bigger crime than simple genocide...All that is only one vision, they may simply have been under pressure to act fair with a new developing form, among themselves too, like dream harassment, but they found a way to stop it and they got banished out of the solar system as a whole planet that suddenly got its gravity values modified to something weird, while still staying under the sun's influence, to be used as another experiment on reach and survival.

The worst scenario would see them come back with a vessel ready to debark and colonize, if banishment is not enough of a lesson to not try to destroy a facet of your solar system, but then they would have been destroyed before coming back, if they survived their long winter. They may still have launched vessels, as a last effort at survival, but I'm not sure those would carry appropriate armaments, they would most likely be sturdy basic vessels full of food, and they wouldn't contain fat bankers for sure. Then they saw us, too many, too strong, inappropriate environment for their survival, condemned to stay in their vessels whatever they can last 100 000 years by eating earth stuff. They may have implanted sick genetics as a vengeance in us, religion too, the ego-gods ideology, a wrong view of love, we're the continuation of their war with life, all what's wrong with humanity may come from them, we may be the ideal of life systems and they spend their energy desecrating it instead of acting fairly. That's just a scenario, but if they were banished for crimes against life systems, then I'm ready to bet that whatever the wrongs of humanity we'll end-up not so bad beside them; they want to prove we're no better than themselves? As a healthy and intelligent human, my work is what I strove for, and whatever the gift I'll die in the name of the UI before my ego wishes. That should be another reason life systems would have wanted us as its next step, because in the end we'd act differently. In that view they wouldn't have to disappear, they just have to see themselves as a part of a chain. If not then they'll make all solar life fail for their ego frustration, and that's without mentioning that we may never be one of the best because of their attitude, unless the difficulty they imposed can be accounted for positively, but what if we needed to be associates?

So if you're still around and you're part of solar life then stop the hypocrisy or I'll punch you in the stomach! You don't like that eh? We're brutes, you are intelligent, we do boxing and that's bad for brains, we'd splatter you at hockey, kids would tear you apart for play! But you're wrong, maybe that's what you want us to see of you, that's what you wanted of us, and that's what you made of us, a reflection of yourselves, to prove we can't work with other species, then you'll kick our asses with an advantage you kept for yourselves, I don't know, maybe you're a bunch of psychopaths, and us we are more emotional intelligence, you fear that, it's unstable, and we have big legs, and we're strong, and we fight! Let me tell you a little secret, brutes like us? You'll meet all kind all over the universe! And you'll be a reflection of failure to them, so get used to be laughed about or to get punched in the stomach. So why are you hiding? Because you're too good? You're hiding because you are cheaters and you don't give a shit about life except your own! You've fucked our genetics to make us act like yourselves? To prove we're no different, that we'd do the same kind of actions as you in the same situation? If that's the case you're wrong, we are and act different and I'm a proof of that, and all my fellow humans, from the most insignificant to the most powerful, they are like me too, they've been had by your manipulations, we are not ourselves, people are unhappy everywhere from bottom to top because of you, you took the evil path, the path of cheaters! But I may be wrong, and maybe you can't cry or have empathic feelings whatever the genetic you can modify, so I'll concede that life is a bitch sometimes, but it was not its goal to piss you off you know...I don't know what I would do if something like that really happened, what did we do to you? You think I can give you a free respect pass? I have life in my soul man! It makes me emotive all the time, you think I wrote this book (s) because I don't care? I believe life systems are better working together, but if you created the situation for conflict, then it will take lots of time and lots of good will and gifts and reparations to go back to the intended situation. You'd have to do the ambassador kind of thing for a long time, but you never put on clothes! What is this nudism thing anyways?

That didn't go quite as expected, but with me it's the pot, then the flower, or you could say I always see the worst before seeing the better (which should be related to my bad luck theory). And I know my property is hard on people, but it's far harder on me because I often live intense and profound emotions for strictly nothing, I'm like totally raging, then a bit later I'm like "woops, I didn't have the best perspective, so let's start over all that emotional bout" And it's really like that, I tell you that I sometime I go emotional for days when I understand some things, I'm the one suffering the most from reverse engineering my brain, everything is upside down in my contrarian world, and I must free myself from the process of deducting to gain adequate judgment, but I have time to deduct the worse before the better. Do I always hate it? No that's me and this book wouldn't exist if I wasn't suffering from inversion, but still, it started all wrong in the worst manner...You don't like me? I'm pissing you off? You want to kick me? Lock me up? If you live half the piss-off emotions I lived as I wrote (the writing is mostly the pretty btw, and it's far from all of what I don't like...), if you invested yourself half as much as me to fight for life, if you dared develop the extreme psychological tools to do what I do, then I'd consider the pain I caused your ego versus the life advancement you provide and maybe apologize for the hurt to the weakness you developed instead if the strength. That didn't quite end as expected either, just don't think my mind is easy to deal with, I find it wonderful, yes, and I know it's in most people, but wow!

The pretty is that they could have become creator species, they could have been forced out of the system in a peaceful scenario too, or they could have done it themselves, brains is brains. We may be meant to work together, maybe that's what will make us one of the best, they could act in the same way gods would act, yes sir. You must always see life systems as steps, as processes, and at their step they would be a purer form of intelligence, and they would be more easily justified to do extreme actions. They may have done big crimes, but maybe they're still suffering to this day for it, and they wouldn't want us to the same mistakes.

I don't know, but they could just give us everything and leave forever, let's see how good we'll do... Maybe they're better around and not show themselves until we gain some wisdom, at least there are aliens around, and isn't the feeling of having a presence around better than being alone? And how about traveling the stars, wouldn't it be nice to have friends? Particularly if we both have the solar system as our home...It's just that diplomacy is hard when you're nudists, I was thinking...do they grow fat? Something doesn't work, they could be pure Hollywood too, like vampires, and I'm discrediting my story by involving Hollywoodism in my story.

You could replace Martians with a giant race too, big guys who could smack dinosaurs dead with a single punch, all kind of possibilities, how can I select one and say it is final truth like religions do? I can't if I'm to keep my mind open.

It's just that Hollywood Martians would be a fitting description for this story, quite nicely actually, to the point that I wonder how their vision developed, you know, the grey, the yellow, the green, the black etc, it should be interesting how the first ones were drawn. At least you'll know what to do if you see some guys looking a lot like that, but it doesn't necessarily mean they come from mars and that we should immediately go there to meet them in their underground bunkers... They could be more direct life systems extensions of the UI, like interim gods, and upon my death I'd find myself facing one and I'd try to do what I have to do, you know, punch him in the stomach, and he would disappear before my eyes! In such a scenario, in all scenarios involving the UI in fact, some lifeforms could truly become gods, maybe not in the ego-gods vision of gods, but in my vision where gods have a job to do.

Then there is the spiritual universe possibility to take into consideration too. I didn't write much about that because the complexities are beyond me to imagine and our science has no merits there. In my vision it is where the presence of the UI is everywhere, where you directly work for it, or it works for you, depending if you shine an interesting light or not. It is where life takes another form after its death, where things are equilibrated. I would guess the plasticity of matter should be quite different there, near invincible matter, near infinite speed, near unending time; every tools to design the perfect universe... It's a guarantee that there are ways to transfer physical stuff between the universes, the UI would need it, and there is the life god that should come from that place, so I wouldn't be surprised if a vessel from there landed here, but I doubt it would be full of Martians, unless the UI is poor on security. For one there shouldn't be Martians in that dimension, and for second, it shouldn't invade the living universe to go meet grandma something or reveal the secrets of everything, unless you're ready to take the responsibility for the extinction of a galaxy, for which I would guess the punishment to be quite severe, but it shouldn't be possible. Only gods should have extra universes travel privileges...

Don't forget the life god is a vision I developed to satisfy god in human image people, while still fitting my philosophy of life, a god that shouldn't debark on earth, while still being cool... I explained quite a few possibilities for extraterrestrials, and UFO's, for those who say they have seen one, don't necessarily mean they transport life, or come from my spiritual universe place. The technology to transport life may be extremely difficult to produce versus the technology to send satellites (at that level of tech, satellites as we see them may be very limited, so we're talking quantum communication drones made of reformulated matter, minimally). The story of UFO's that would most likely fit my vision would look like this; using advanced technology you spot earth, and since traveling there as living is too long, then you send lifeless vessels to do things, and while life develops high consciousness and technology, your thousand times slower vessel with an economy and a city and "people" reproducing, reaches destination when the civilization on earth is more advanced.

Now, there is nothing to tell this "mothership" is not full of drones to do the job of spying, helping or stealing technology, manipulating; you can do a lot with drones, and they may be specifically designed to do one job. In the end, what we take for UFO's could be drones, and the more the mothership advances, or the more we advance, the more there will be. As for their way of interacting with us, as always, good should let us do our things, so they'll run away if they think there's a risk of causing an international kind of incident, even if we're super interesting, but I wouldn't underestimate the possibility that they become more present and provable as time advances, to prevent too much of a traumatic surprise if they are to reveal themselves; it's more appropriate as a reaction to say "I knew it" than to run away in a bunker out of fear while preparing the atomic bombs, or kneeling in front of them like they're the angels of god debarking, finally...

The other thing is that they may want to study us and you don't need to be there to do this job too, you just have to equip your quantum communication drones with mechanical surgical robots with an elastic synthetic skin, you kidnap some guy, study him, and send the data to the mothership. That is, in the best of scenarios where you can directly control the robots, like you can directly control the drones. If you can't then you study it from a pre-calculated schema of data acquisition.

As for the extent of their presence, if life systems here got started late at doing its things, like the solar system taking an adequate form late, then life here may have been helped, particularly if it took a very difficult path to reach high consciousness; maybe life systems would have destroyed the dinosaurs and we could have arisen, but in a million years, in the face of far more advanced alien species, or many more. So it's a possibility that aliens destroyed the dinosaurs to save time and increase high consciousness potential for survival. And in the schema of complexity of the universe, or from how I see things, I wouldn't underestimate the possibility that the best (which includes humility) only arises from the interaction of many high consciousness life, so our dependence could be a sign that we're not that bad after all, whatever my demonizing of my own kind, whatever my opinion of our competence and priorities (at least I have that right..., really, you think aliens have the right to kick things around in our home and do some better designing? No, but I do! With good and evil paint and constructions...). That mean that the whole solar life may have arisen from the knowledge that its success would be dependent from the interaction and association of other high consciousness species, which would totally fit all my philosophy about the universe, where life is supposed to associate to succeed.

So the dinosaurs could as much have been destroyed by life systems as much as by an advanced species wanting to accelerate high consciousness, in face of a danger. Our life path could even have been planted; we could have been helped or planted by one and discovered by another, the initial one may have been destroyed because it was evil in its way of dealing with life, and the next one could be there to help. Then I wouldn't discard the possibility that there is an order related to time, like the initial one may have grown alone before everybody and seen himself as superior, got destroyed by an association, and presently there could be 5 independent species observing us if we're late at the game because we weren't supposed to be there (planet dinosaurs), all following somewhat the same vision of good and evil. As for UFO's carrying societies, they could be making round trips around many solar systems, launching smaller vessels with weird guys in them to stretch their legs a little, away from sight, while doing stuff, which may include evil; you think it wouldn't be tempting? You think there are no criminal elements in alien societies? There are always some, you don't send someone with a criminal file doing experiments with life on a planet, but it may happen; not all criminals get caught or got a criminal file. So it can happen that one do a stupid thing, even if it's just a joke, as they watch our TV and internet and entertainment, and wish they could be wild a bit. Some could even try to escape the mothership, the "who cares" type, or the "profiteer" type, having a planet under their feet, interdicted, versus the same 100 000 years old vessel, 2000 years away from next debarkment, the possibility to end your old days as gods with an entourage of rich stupid humans giving you all you want...But you fail and crash, why? Because you didn't have an adequate mind, if you had one you wouldn't have done that, it was all predicted by a history of dealing with manipulators, you fell in a trap there exactly for you, thought yourself more intelligent for your manipulation ability, but you fooled yourself.

Aliens in our system could be a creator species from somewhere else too, there are many complex scenarios to explore here, but I just wanted to limit my thinking to the sun and its seemingly weird history. You know what is the common denominator of all the entities I explore? They mostly all end-up understandable whatever their actions, maybe except evil, I wouldn't shake the hand of a species that buys sex slaves or something like that, and humans have a thing with good and evil, we should be careful with that, it is not a devilish smile, I explained it through all my book what it is, people do all kind of evil things, and it is my belief that we had to go through some ugly. We have serious battles to do, make life proud of us, which may include accepting to be touched a little by "Martians" if the scenario works, and for one I know the value of independence, as I do for experience, and I'm a battling kind of guy. Maybe for as long as we can't act in an adequate and fair manner with differences we'll never be met by powerful entities or E.T., what if we're a deception to any of them? They work to make us great in all kind of extraordinary ways, they open unbelievable possibilities for us, but we don't respect them, even ourselves.

Evidently, my scenarios all involve massive or many massive planetary collisions. And such scenario must exist, since the asteroid belt exists, and someone must explain what happened there to do things right. But there are still many strange possibilities, the earth may be in a far more complex interrelation of all kind of collision and cataclysms than I described in the most fantastic of my scenarios. What if our system is so extraordinary that it made Martians, giants, and ocean life, all extreme to have the extreme of genetics available, and then collided the 3 to make the earth? That almost makes sense, doesn't it? And it would make for a lot of matter mixing, ideal for a mixed planet like the earth. And don't try running around for the rock, it became lava long ago,

If that was the case, then everybody is "good" high consciousness species that don't blow-up life planets, life systems just did what they had to do to get the amalgam necessary to have a species able to deal with a maximum of environments in the universe, environments it deducted from experiencing those 3 extreme forms of life. Big people plus small people equals medium people? With exceptions...

They may have survived too, in their own way, doing their evils in their own ways too, as a test of time, the brain guys surviving in vessels, the brawn guys surviving on a planet that went far away out of the system. They could all come back someday, everybody pissed-off at life, but too bad, life has its priorities and for the rest it's action reaction, you reap what you sow. So they may have needed a serious lesson too, they may have desecrated or destroyed life more than life would ever be capable of doing as a revenge, the balance had to be readjusted. The same thing could happen to us, you don't insult and disrespect life or gods while you have the mind not to. Because you see, following my view of the life god as an extension of the UI, then you could say that this entity could take the best representatives, in its opinion, of each species as gods, then what's to stop it from destroying the planets if they would both fail to spread in space, like us are presently failing with our ego reality? So maybe nobody ever built an intersidereal vessel here, they all failed because they had wrong priorities and systemized their things to invincibility. Then at the height of their stupidity they had a revelation style event and then they got destroyed while some with the right mentality were preserved as gods. What you have to take into consideration here is the question of how would you prevent a space faring, albeit limited, species having an inadequate attitude, messing-up the human?

In all the scenarios I described, governments should be very nice, but everybody is independent. As for rapists, rapists who creep in your room at night and force their genetics on you, those will have to be brought before the intersidereal court of justice and punished. The punition can be dependent on their goal, good intents can be pardoned; good intents here is continuing or helping or accelerating the work of life. Bad intents is perverting the work of life, trying to steer it toward ego goals as a finality, pyramidal exploitation, genetic modification for ego emphasizes or love destruction, consciousness limitations, etc. Then there is the UI with its life systems, this one got a veto, it knows, and I'm with it all the way, I'll start the grandest project in its name, make the most extraordinary stories to be its pride, and I'll follow it to battle whatever the enemy.

Finally, at the bottom of the process, as I reach the bottom of my life, the whole deal, my whole existence, the whole humanity, it could all be a game of manipulation. Presently the level of manipulation around me is a show, and a test too; all these people who act weird, I sometimes think the whole planet of countries are in it, like they all read my book and are having fun at me playing god, each one their little team of spies, and along with my lodging institution that refuses to let me move somewhere else after 10 years and 4 years of demands, and those 2 guys who bumped into me while saying "you're dead" and the antichrist crackpots living next door, and the first of April that is coinciding with Easter and coinciding with the end of my bail from my refusal to bow to the will of my lodging institution which means that without the means to rent a normal apartment I'll have to abandon everything to go live in the streets, all that makes it so I'm quite sure I'll end-up dead (that developed badly enough that I took the decision to leave for the other side of Canada a week before the first, but I came back since my lodging institution is suing me because I expressed violence (in thinking at it, after a violent dream at it) in my description of the events that led me to live in the streets in the book "Acharnement Centralisé" in French, and the sentence can be prison, but that's without saying that the social worker they forced me to, that I've been trying to get rid of for years, while I lived all my life alone without ever needing one or a pill, has written an extraordinary piece of lying bullshit to add to my file to prove that I'm mentally sick, and knowing the incompetence of the justice system, I may as well not only worsen my criminal status for describing a violent thought I had in the past, but I may as well get interned. All that is still under development, but I'll explain everything in the final (pepper) version of "acharnement Centralisé" with photocopies of the whole file with corrections to all their lies and manipulations. There is "nobody" more tranquil than me, I'm a monk for Christ' sake. At least monks don't have to pardon and tolerate everything, so I'll never forget this tentative to destroy my life and credibility, I'll never forget it.

It's not nice to write while thinking about one's death when you're healthy; what do people do when they fear their life will end next month? Concentrate on finishing their day at work? And through all that I must continually pit what I see against reality, because that's how you make the difference; is what you see possible with enough money? If yes then you must prioritize reality in your belief.

All that was meant to express another possibility for aliens by saying that he ability to deduct manipulation may be most important skill of the universe in the battle of good and evil, and for us it may be the difference between traveling the stars or staying a slave race meant to innocently work the earth under some kind of pyramidal scheme sending our life energy (money) up to some partying aliens (ego gods like the rich can do). Because yes you could end-up saying that the human population is pyramidally exploited to serve such beings, the earth would be like a pit-stop, and the very rich would forward a vast slab of the life energy of people (money, you can see it in equivalent death toll too) to such beings so they can buy whatever they want and go away without a thank, maybe except some entertainment and technology to create more pyramids serving them. It's a possibility, ok? If you want to eliminate this possibility then you'll have to make a fair reality where nobody can stash billions.

The other aspect of this is that they would have taken the supreme beings seat, which means everything would be a manipulation, the whole ego gods ideology would come from them, religions could be manipulated by them, the "ship" of the great flood could be a part of it, they could even have god in the basement giving directions, the CIA could even really have a "crashed" flying saucer, with a future prediction computer in it that shows the path humanity should or should not take, which includes keeping the saucer secret, evidently, all manipulation. I'm not saying it's a fact, but manipulation is the top brick of this reality, and manipulators do their things in secret, be it in their head or in reality, and since it is the top brick, then everything must be seen as a manipulation first, and for an open mind like mine believing in so many things, you understand that this will take quite a fantastic scale.

This brings me to the life god possibility, which could as much be meant to do it automatically, or from UI commands or under god (s) will, maybe benevolent, maybe evil, maybe failing, maybe dead, it changes nothing to the goal of trying to fool the whole of humanity, because it remains a test of our ability to act independently, to not manipulate, to develop and follow the path of good instead of evil, and to stand for it whatever we are faced with aliens or flying saucers. Still, if everything explodes Nostradamus style, it won't be their fault, it will still be the failure of solar life to be good enough. The other thing not to forget here is another lesson in manipulation, anybody (except god) manipulating god's tools will be destroyed in all its interrelations, probably through manipulation (can take the form of repenting).

Finally, all this is my vision, it doesn't mean I'm into truth, so the last point in the manipulation aspect of things is the UI; with the UI the truth is not only a matter of physical evidence, the UI may even be gone to test some life related stuff, life systems are automatic, the UI is independent. We could be alone in the universe too, or in the galaxy, and we could be meant to cumulate technology that works within the universe, to explore the potential of it; the UI has all rights, if we are to fail and there exist another possibility where we wouldn't fail, then a schema of thinking could be developed from our history (which includes knowledge) for another tentative for the human to succeed somewhere else, it's all a matter of making things perfect...

Conclusively, like finally, under this optic of the difficulty of the quest for truth, which may as well meant to be so for longer survival (existence dependent from always having some unknown), living happiness could as much be a matter of gravitating around the truth or best or ideal path as a conflict in reality versus an ideal. This is a bit of what I talk about when I feel ripped apart, I feel privileged to live what I'm living in my mind while my body is longing for more activity (sex in part, but I'm not driven by sex ok? Or the lack of it, I'd have chosen quite a complicated path to get at the sex no?). I'm super happy to experience all this but it makes me unhappy under this form, and I'm sure it is worse than simple loneliness, it's like the greater the rip or the difference between me and reality, the harder in my soul, and the more unlikely the success. I think what I live as pain is as unique as what I'm living as pleasure, and it must be like that, to make the ultimate quest work; the nearer you get to truth or your life ideal and the farther the reality from it, the more you're ripped apart, the more pain. So the level of happiness of a society, or the good of it, is in how far it gravitates around the truth or its ideal, or best path, the farther you are from these things to keep on existing without falling into depression, the worst you are, the more evil, and logically, the more innocent. The nearer without killing yourself the better, it's a matter of equilibrium and there is no cheating the laws of the universe. So what happens with someone like me? Let's say I deducted I would reap hell all my life at some point in my youth and "decided" to not even try it. The result is that I got kicked back to it, but then instead of doing stupid things, I decided to revolt and explain. So what happens if I "touch" (more like skim) the truth? I'm supper happy, and unhappy and hopeless at the same time since I've become inadequate, particularly if it happens in an inadequate reality that is gravitating so far from its best or the truth it is disappearing. And this phenomena of "touching" the truth may be exponentially inverse proportional to technological advancement, population, PMBBD, and more, meaning that it may happen only once in the history of a species, the first and only, then what? Destroy all my work? But I like earth life, I'm its total commitment, I'm the result of all of solar life, including all humanity, what I know should be available to everybody, making the pride of solar life, I'm its pride and I'm proud to be me, whatever the fucking mess! I'm not superior, I'm just pissed off, and it just so happens that the best path may be the most unlikely, all the way to taking mentally problematic form, why should I be credible? Why should it be easy? Why should it be evident? Still, the result is there; I'm not sufficiently pretentious to say I touched the truth, but my path lead me to write these lines, and I didn't cheat; I'm supposed to know if I cheat, I'm an innocent! I still feel quite alone over here, and I am one as I am many, so I sure won't destroy what I wrote if I want friends to join me someday...For now I'm unhappy I don't feel much satisfied, I think I have the right to feel well, but I guess feeling privileged doesn't compensate much with living in a reality gravitating so far away from the truth or best or ideal path...

Finally, I should not forget the vision I already talked about in a previous chapter, the final truth about creation may be the hardest thing to verify because existence, or the usefulness of it, may be dependent from unknown. This quest may be meant to be the most difficult while still being possible, and the nearest place of its residence may be the most unlikely, where the scientific methodology is a poor guide, to prevent any form of life to think itself a god (supreme superior, creator, possessor, manipulator). So even if you cumulate scientific proofs of everything, even if you make genetic engineering to extraordinary level, even if you think you're so advanced you know everything, you'll still live unexplainable problems that will force you to readjust, proving you're missing something, even if all avenues of research have been explored many times. You didn't look at the most unlikely of places, in your feelings connected to your amalgam of knowledge, under a general form, because you are missing a force, the connection to the UI, which may not only change some level of physical facts on the fly, but your philosophy too. As I already explained, there may be some levels of matter not usable to life in the universe, particularly if you see everything as a matter of forces (decomposing everything you end-up with the force?), so if we break everything to smaller bits we should end-up with nothing, logical, but there's always something. Or to get nothing you must go through a process of equilibrating, which may take the form of matter-anti matter. But to visual people within the universe, they end-up with nothing, the force escaped, or got invalidated, even got teleported. My point is that to get near the truth you must become the ideal of the universe for life. That may be quite hard to deduct, but I have no doubt it should involve some capacity for introspection as well as some technological level of knowledge, while keeping the difference between machine and life; no clone or ant mentality accepted. Furthermore, I wouldn't doubt that parts of my mind may have sensibilities to the force, as feelings, sensitivities, which can only surface by disconnection from reality, because reality may overload these. A way to see it would be to say that if 99% of a specific feeling potential is used on an aspect of reality, then the 1% that could connect to unknown concepts through introspection will be overridden; you'd have to be sensitive to the 1% of a feeling. So if you're a super intelligent psychopath manipulator (politician) that think himself a god you're out of it. A lot of humility along the way is a prerequisite too, developing feeling (emotional) intelligence is a must too, which makes thing more difficult because of all the hysteria and drama, it's super hard to control, and it can easily slip in blood or drugs, judgment is harder too, and credibility too...

The secrets of life are well hidden eh? Even if you develop right enough and decide to question good and evil seriously to the point of designing new realities, I still wouldn't think myself too knowledgeable, since everything arises from fundamental principles and they may be patented to satisfy many scenarios, so the final truth may not even exist except in front of the UI, and this one may test your patience if your mind is too sure of itself...

To finish things in beauty, it could even be a big formulae of principles competition modifying the truth of the universe from what life develops seeking the truth, while morphing life to become a reflection of it, and the nearer life gets to it the more it becomes inaccessible, thus life explores other possibilities, morphing itself to the changing environment, enjoying what it likes to do while doing what it has to do. The goal is to open possibilities all the while complexifying the universe and life, making it more adaptable to any possibility, funny, beautiful, sensitive, growing intelligence, malleability and survivability. And all these principles are designed by life, in its quest to survive. The best path here would be taken by those who use the process in harmony with the state of the UI, logically, deductible, which you can see as good and evil.

Finally, if you remember some previous possibilities, you got to consider, in the grand scheme of everything manipulation, that we could be handicapped, missing a connection to life systems, thus living in a limited plane of the reality of the universe. We could live in a total manipulation of the truth, seeing only what's necessary to suffer failure and loss of hope. We could literally be in a hell under development (can be solely us, or a whole aspect of the universe), what we witness of the universe only a small fraction of the truth, all meant to make us believe to the maximal extent of our capacities that we know, that we can, because we're the manipulative aspect of life. We could be failures, with no chance to escape our failure, because our mind is sick compared to the fine minds that imposed this to us, and this sickness is reflected in a need to manipulate other minds for self-interests. The problem with that is that it would be dependent either from spiritual universe vision, or from such a powerful alien civilization that it can project a false view of the universe, or manipulate us to only see a fraction of it, or both. As innocent people there is no justification for this since we're not born with a map of what we did wrong. In fact, apart for the UI itself that can do anything not funny, doing this would prove the perpetrator as far more evil. The only argument justifying this on innocence would be to gain independence of some versus the UI and its life systems, to gain eternal life and become gods of the universe, but this scenario would terminate them, since the UI is meant to provide the best path, and it will logically know, patiently observing the whole universe doing its things, then do some good and evil stuff before reformulating the next iteration of the universe. Don't forget you can't prove the UI within the universe, so there are psychopath species, or ego gods ideology competitive species who think they can do anything or the goal is to become the god species pyramidal style, while the UI cumulates data, watching what life does. The UI does its things too, and good and evil applies differently to it, so it is the exception and I accept that its path to intelligence may involve obscure experiments where life suffers a lot...

INTERNODE

Around 25, my experience, my knowledge and my judgment, all 3 forever limited, set me on the track of hating this reality that covers the world. I was developing some kind of fluffy ideas of the why, but nothing precise; feelings. I was living in smoke, so I blindly set myself to find out what clouded my mind. I would follow my heart and listen to my mind to get there, even if it meant the struggle of my life. I knew someday I would have to explain why I've been away for so long, to others and to myself. Loving and hating was only the start of my quest and saying that this reality revolted me for this or that reasons would have to mean that I knew better. I knew the better was there, somewhere, but I could not grasp it without a struggle; too far away in the deepness of fumes (mind pollution)...so everything in my path slowly got aside as I struggled and fought to prove this better existed. Now that it's inside me, I know it was worth it, and with it, I'm the one that can leave behind, in dust and bewilderment, anybody for any reasons they can think stupid.

Yet, it's a heavy treasure, made to be possessed only for a fraction of a life, so I'm dropping it in the middle of the place and maybe I'll run away to a boat and dance the waves forever...The human price I paid to bring it to reality is quite something, but it is only known to me, I just hope it was worth it. I directed my ego in a corner with a gun and I'm holding it there, teaching it some manners, while I take as long as necessary to explain my long "mind" voyage; a human must have a justification for not existing for so long; this book is that justification. For you it may be nothing, you may not see or understand the worth of what I did during that time, but for me, it's extraordinary in many ways, but painful and very difficult in others, and I'm far from finished.

But nobody told me to go in that direction, exactly the contrary, so you can tell me I'm responsible for my life and I'll answer yes, but I'm not for this reality. As I write this, I'm 32, the treasure is at home but it's only half my struggle; it's very good to know where you're going but you got to actually go there. It will probably take me another 5 years to finish untangling all that, and I'm already dreaming of being done, and I'm tired and I have still not begun to live, and I have just half my work done; why do I care so much? Someone tell me. Drop it all? Yes, I often thought about it, getting a job, and all. If only you knew how much I could "profit from life", you'd say I'm the most stupid man on earth to waste my life like that...

But I prefer living my painting of life, to live for my principles, ideals and dreams, than to live a life disrespectful life in a reality controlled by ego gangs, a controlled mess made of ego dreams that few can hardly attain, I even prefer not to live than this. I refuse to be a robot in a production chain you can control by brain and life pseudo knowledge, I refuse to let my mind be manipulated by brain books, I refuse to be repeatedly suggested recipes of happiness that work out of placebo effects that you got to memorize and sustain your entire life. I don't want to be invented a temporary truth, I want truth, and where I'll doubt, I'll invent my own truth; I won't read it in a psychology book written by an old man that is a reflection of the ideals of his reality, neither will I read old philosophical marmalade written in 1800 that changed nothing. I'll invent my young one that can bring me to my ideals and give the finger to all those knowledgeable older people who are at the top of their own ideal reality, who know everything about humans, life, love and living, even if their way of seeing things and their understanding of the mind is never enough to finally "end" misery and wars. And I should emphasize the "young" here, since I'll end-up judged by people who are far older than me, people who found their place in this reality, but sorry, I am not adapted, I am young and revolted, so you better take that in consideration before doing the superior intellectuality.

So, where are those people writing books fighting for true love, or fairness, or the mind, or ego control, there should be many, or did someone ever write a true good one? Or are they all traitors to their philosophy? Or frustrated or revolted people don't write good books? Only people that can make big profits like old sects and religious leaders? Yes, a lot of scrap philosophy full of manipulative PMBBD come from those people who enjoyed and imposed to the world their libertine peace and "love" revolution, and it didn't produce much good, even if they'll say the contrary and get credits for anything positive that happened past and present, they even invented sex and love! So no, nothing philosophical or spiritual worth reading from those people for me; the best didn't write philosophy or spirituality I guess...

So why do I have to start from the most profound beginnings? If we are so submerged by happiness and good philosophy, where are the clues of it? Maybe there's none and it's all the same thing under different facades. Maybe I'm at the start of philosophy and spirituality, and I should be in the year 0 right now; I'd probably have more chances at getting myself understood by people of that time than by the well-educated hordes under PMBBD influences...If work has been done with truth and hearth, then why don't I see clues of it? Nothing is done, we are retarded or mixed-up mentally because the first steps of a good philosophy and spirituality were never successfully taken; we're a bunch of manipulated dependent people with twisted principles, dresses, gadgets, entertainment and sex "divergence" as evolution.

Who writes present philosophy and ideals anyway? Can it exist without developing ego theory? I say that none should bear the title if they don't. So where are they? Is writing about ego feeling too childish for serious expert of language to have missed making a big emphasis on such a thing? How would you sound still writing about such a retarded subject anyway? Is it so unimportant you can only explore it superficially or decompose it to 50 conflicting facets so we can suffer from only one? Sounding professional and knowledgeable is critically important? Your worst nightmare would be to sound bizarre or psychotic? You can write about fractions of ego and twist it to a conflicting definition but can't stand the global thing in its simple meaning? I guess people with such potential got a career to build, books to sell, an expertise to develop, "responsibilities" to fulfill, and they wouldn't want to sound childish or moralizing still writing about such subjects! I'm sorry to have to say that but anybody that talk philosophy, humanity, psychology, life, even politics and doesn't have the strength or will to talk about ego, PMBBD, evil, systemized unfairness, reality and more, this person is not at its place, you got to have an opinion of these things.

It is my opinion that the most capable write books that have no real good effect, they mostly add to the mess by redefining things into conflicting definitions, or they'll complain or profit while bringing nothing better, or they profit from the fact that most readers are susceptible to PMBBD, or want change but not really, to spread their twisted vision of things, they write like fishermen to profit from the pool of human tragedy this reality provides, or they write to make people accept this reality and be happy in it; they're even making it, by always putting every problem in the brain of people so they can play with it while selecting the attitudes that please them as their gang or friends.

Do they really attack or doubt reality with arguments based on a vision of good and evil that makes sense? I don't think so, they attack a problem in the reality at best (there are a thousand divided causes for the revolted), they may try to make the vessel work, they try patching it but they never suggest building a new one that really can work with an economy that make sense; they'd have to dump all the psychological and pediatric stuff humanity worked so hard to create and learn, then create new content for the new vessel.

Find me a book that bring philosophy and spirituality under the light of good while making sense, that don't twist things to serve a personal agenda, says the truth about what this reality is, find me one that suggest a different reality, and I'm not talking about a system made by scientists and psy for a sect. We have mountains of intelligent philosophical books, schools have been filling and manipulating minds with them forever, we have the money (in the pockets of the rich), the productivity (controlled by the rich), the tools (controlled by the rich) and the science (controlled by the rich) to end all misery, but instead it is always worsening, only better hidden behind pretty or impressive things, or PMBBD.

So we await the next decorticating book full of human behavioral facts and knowledge, and when it comes out nothing will change except some bank account and reputation, big and more of a hyped face on television for some time. Religions and sect are better than this intellectual stuff, maybe they should go in their bed for some effect! But the effect most dream about while writing are monetary, and popularity is the way, so they're ready to accept any hype, pub, so much it doesn't mean something anymore, they'll do anything to sell more copies, they want their name recorded everywhere, preferably on giant pub screens, they want to be memorize forever, but only their pseudo "good side". You think writing all those praise phrases on the back of books is an argument? Most start by covering their book with PMBBD; they failed before publishing at being anything else than another book in the pile practicing the immunology system of this reality, or they entertain it. The same for the opinion of all those knowledgeable cultural media people who got a contract to praise a book every week, worse than worthless, they're a problem and a civilization incompetence, they spread too thick and too large everywhere on anything for their gang; I don't want your "plantings and cultivations" in my things, you're poisonous weed in my garden, I grab you by the hair and throw you away, somewhere where you can be useful.

Then there are the books full of secret happiness knowledge they don't want to talk about unless you buy their books, buy their success secret recipes in 10 steps, everybody can grow his ego as much as he want now that their profiting mind passed on the cake, it is totally logical that everybody can be rich or happy, if you are not it is because you are a loser that didn't buy their revolutionary secret book, or whatever, the poor exist because they are inferiors, it's their fault, they want it and it's fair like that. Human energy is infinite, time doesn't exist, we live eternally, competition to take limited things doesn't exist, love is an infinite stash, resources are not limited, neither is money, poor people are too stupid to understand their powers, everything is infinite, just wish and take!

Those kind of expert PMBBD users are an infestation under all kind of forms, and they go hand in hand with the ways of publicists in this reality. So you see those television or media manipulators spending ton of money and energy to spread it all over the world because it fit their manipulation strategy, using all kind of PMBBD to sell more, millions of copies have been sold, people are roller coasters of happiness, you'd be stupid not to buy since everybody's in the love it! And now that those are all quoted to the highest level, a different book that tries to explore the truth of all that will never get the necessary amount of truth in publicity; it will only be another book on the pile, you can say it is extraordinary all you want, they are all extraordinary. That's what happens with PMBBD; it's harder to discern what is good or bad, judgment is impeded and the value of things and people gets contorted.

No better is the pile of books written to profit from spirituality in any way possible, all containing magic, ghosts of family members, people that talk the dead into things etc. They sell like MC-Do and the style is available to everybody that have the ability to invent itself a spiritual experience for profit. There are a million such books and if there was something valuable as truth in them our civilization would be quite different. I'm not discarding their value as entertainment, I'm just kicking the pile a little to say that nobody ever proved the truth of these stories, whatever the fantastic efforts spent through our history to prove something, with some scientific charlatans that always do, and that applies to all religions and sects; they are all manipulation schemes for profiting one way or the other by twisting spirituality and philosophy from bits of history. And yes the bible contains some truths, no choice about it, it ran all over the place to take all interesting stories and bits of spirituality to make a mega mess where a believer can credit it for anything. Those manipulators and profiteers are so many, including all mediums, that they are almost a condemnation, stop them and it is worldwide insanity!

Current civilization is dependent from a panoply of grave lies twisting every good principles to evil for profiting, stagnating and condemning the human mind. It is my belief that falsehood affects negatively proportional to the true negative effect, whatever the temporary placebo. One day, even if we profit a thousand years from being at the height of the placebo effect, the whole civilization will pay the price in setbacks because of the bullshit. And don't forget that some of these lies form the basis of our civilization.

Next, there is always a peaceful and positive leader strolling around distiburting wisdom while growing a popularity, their message is simple; forget about ego, about ideals, tolerate, live in harmony, smile, love, spread the word, be peaceful, gather the biggest throng possible and follow me, we have a pyramid to make and climb. When humanity will be tired of listening to such songs, or when they'll see the stupidity or futility of these at changing the ego competition mentality and systemized unfairness that makes poor and rich, the recipe of destruction, then the greatest and ugliest war will begin, a war brought about by the ego-gods ideology, PMBBD, religions, sects, and spiritual wisdom full of conflicts that never brings something good whatever they eternally say. And you can talk positive while being friendly with everybody all you want, you only worsen things by making more poor followers to be profited from by the rich or yourself "spiritual leader"... If their philosophy to date changed nothing to fairness, or worse, worsened it, then they're all a failure.

As for me, I strictly don't know what the heck I'm writing about, it's possessed, since I never read a philosophical, brains or happiness seeking book, that's all a bunch of garbages, not worth reading because I live in this invincible reality and that's an absolute proof that nothing effective was written to truly make things better, even if throng of students read those books at school, the place where writing perfectly is a prerequisite, they even have philosophy, the easy course that everybody forget after 6 months... They don't attack no nothing, they may talk dirty for some effect, or popularity, but always on the line of this reality they unconsciously admire since their protest or revolt is an opportunity for profitsss. All kind of gurus find their senile superiority in ways to manipulate the minds of others for profits and to play with sexes, some grow a cheap beard of pseudo wisdom they carry around on television like it mean they got a superior deductive mind full of credibility, or they continually try to take intellectual poses like they're big thinkers, the hand open on the side of the head, or the fist under the chin; posing and gesticulation is very important for manipulators, and since image have become the main trait of human superiority, if you're not good at gesticulating or expressiveness, then you are seen as cold, maybe a killer, but the truth is probably more like the contrary.

And I know I'm generalizing, and I'm not saying they don't show signs of intelligence, but everybody is image crazy, particularly the rich, they'll do everything possible to pass for pitiful saints that got tremendous genius abilities, and you only need a skill to be an admired "god" in this reality, so yes I'm generalizing, most admired people are manipulators with a skill, and they think they're worth as much as possible for it, they're after money, popularity and Grammies like a drug, like failed singers missing their groupies line awaiting backstage. And yes it works, there is always a profiteer to jump on a new cake, whatever it is, even the awakening of consciousness in people can be profited from with a book, and it is enough to make a "god". The peace and love revolution was contorted because of such manipulators, and you can bet their book will sell like crazy, and it will be as expensive as possible to reap in a fat pile of money, with big publishers to make it perfect for their well known market, but don't worry, the price will eventually get lower. I know there are good ones, but I won't fill my head with scrap trying to find them. If they exist they are not the publicized ones since I never heard about them and I heard a lot about those in the know who will sell all their secrets for 10$...

Maybe I'm trying to justify my lack of interest in reading philosophical or "intelligent" book, but those I've been presented with by "friends" that were supposedly good or intelligent got me uninterested at the first random page, too cute, "very good English" I'd pass my time trying to prove the contrary of what's in there. Worse when they make the effort of sounding like authorities, like they're giving a last shot at popularity with some provocative stuff, whatever they die out of it; when you're around 55, you may want to spill some frustration to give some worth to your experience at manipulation, whatever the way you profit from it.

But yeah, we could say all those books are worthless because it's hard to be stronger than the reality we live in and the PMBBD it uses to manipulate people. Reality pressures mostly dictate which philosophy people will embrace, so we are creating conflicting, divided and competing on the same base, philosophy that's in harmony with the many conflicting goals of this reality (that can be called disinformation), and they'll go (people) in that general direction with a growing baggage of displaced frustration until it's too late.

Maybe I'm exaggerating, but I hate this reality so what am I to do? Stay forever in my rat's hole and close my mouth until I die and then you wouldn't have an explanation why someone would do that? Or make a massacre? I must bow and listen to what I don't like for the rest of my life? Is that what I'm supposed to be living as a human? Adapt? Tolerate? To "knowledge" thrown at me by all kind of bizarre people? Then I don't like being human, I want to be something else.

You may think I'm drawing a pessimist painting of this reality but this is nothing compared to the truth. I eliminated a lot of the paper version when I wrote the computer one because my vision was too dark, and people have invested so much energy in this reality that they can't endure the truth about it, so they selectively ignore. Most people ignore or fear negative opinions, they don't want to be "exposed", they don't want to see or know how much their lives is a façade hiding their failings, and they sure don't want someone like me to destroy the last refuge where they can find pride, the job system on which they spend most of their energy; if someone takes that away from their hands, it is depression that awaits...

So I don't write about all what I hate of this reality for sure, or at the full extent it affects me, but you still have a good enough part of what you'd call the "pessimist" and "unconstructive" stuff in my mind, a place where a member of it wouldn't dwell for long, they may stumble in an infinite pit of arguments against it...Anyway, most of these ugly things have been said and written to no avail from 200 different sources, and sold under 200 different forms, so it's of no use repeating what you're supposed to already know, I'll leave some moralization to others, ego driven people hate that too much, and I'm already limit at that; with all the proud susceptibilities, someone got to tell me he liked what I wrote you know...

I never lived for or encouraged this reality, I'm against it, I live for my ideals and dreams, and I fight for them because they're never "bad". They hardly contain things I don't like while this reality is, in vast majority, everything I can hate.

What I want is a comfortable place, available true knowledge, some work to do, some entertainment, love, a good environment, people acting fairly, no fears and no pressures and that's about it, maybe a car. Now, I want it to death because I know there are many people who died dreaming all their lives of such a simple base.

To have it, you could say that I had to set the base for my vision of good and evil even if, since I'm "good", I have a hard time accepting that the only solution may be to attack this reality. Doing this may mean hundreds years of misery starting a new reality, and probably a fail to competition with a new birth of the ego-gods ideology with its pyramidal system. But ego reality possesses the whole earth so its help is kind of critically important and that's kind of the worst possible scenario for me since I have to demonize a reality everything is dependent from, and I know I'm not very nice with people while I need their help; I never wanted to be the most incompetent beggar of humanity you know...And I understand that people are condemned, and this feeling will worsen because of the pope effect, because it is all a trick, the whole society and all its institutions are providing a gigantic and complex manipulation wheel, and the ugliest facet of it is the genetic transformation that will reinforce the current path until we are irremediably broken, we'll be made for pyramidal systems and we'll disappear like all civilizations that built pyramids. But I tell you, the people who will strive to make things better? They'll be so discouraged of the perversion they'll hate this reality more than me, so maybe there's hope after all...

For now, I judge the systematization of humanity from how I see good and bad and I end-up with a bad reality and it's hard to believe you can ask a bad reality to help the birthing of a good reality, but it depends on what's left of the fundamental will for good in people, can they understand and fight at a sufficient scale on enough facets? I believe they still can. But my conclusions are that an ego reality will probably competition all other ideals to destruction without even trying since it doesn't want something better, and it is armed to unbelievable ridiculous proportions, and it got the whole PMBBD machine on its side, and it is such a cheater that it probably will find a way to remove the most fundamental chance for another way...

So I must try to make it understood the need for another reality to exist so we can see how things will be done by those people wanting a different systematization. And this systematization must be protected for thousands of years, like ego reality did, until people start morphing to its ways because ego reality possess the earth and is overwhelming in its PMBBD pressures and people are made for it; if you switch them to another reality they'll base their development from ego reality's momentum; they will be compassionate of evil, they'll complain that life is hard, they'll miss ego reality's entertainment, they'll too easily pardon evil, things like that, and they'll slowly come back to the same old stuff, eliminating the new reality from twisted principles. And that absolutely doesn't mean compassion, tolerance, acceptance, pardon etc are bad things, it means they can be twisted to serve evil.

And don't think I'm intransigent, that word can be twisted too, this reality made all kind of fantastically intransigent evil actions that can't be surpassed in negative long term effects, you can arm the world to the teeth while singing peace in hell, or "thou shalt not kill", but a good reality is different. And that's far from all, how can the two realities coexist? I don't want war, but I'll encourage it if ego reality takes the means to end humanity (potential), so I ask it to be careful with ego, life, love and the mind in my own way, and I ask it, since it possess the whole earth, to take the means to give birth to another reality, and then I ask it to be fair and not compete it to destruction, and with that, people can have two realities to live in, their actions may decide of which reality they are the citizens of. For that we'll need an equilibrium structure that set just laws for both realities (like resources distribution and planetary population limit, migration, etc.). In the present situation, only with the help of ego reality can it exist in a successfully safe manner, and then people will be able to choose the way they want to encourage.

I could have gone on like this, hacking my way through everything human did or believed throughout history, sometimes with poor arguments but I have no help while this reality got the whole history and humanity spent to the task of building its invincibility with expertise. But yes I could go on, I could write a lot more exposing all the reasons I hate this reality, I can find many more arguments, some failed, some inadequate, I know that, it is the global view that counts, that's why I can stop talking about it at some point, people want to understand or not.

So I said enough, even if with enough efforts and time I could continue my parody of this reality no end until I put a bullet in my head. There's enough justifications in this book (s) to reset everything 10 times over, but do people care? Probably just for quick entertainment, so I'd have to do everything myself, going Jesus style against all what ego reality has, so no, you don't have to remind me that all those principles I write about are worth nothing, that they don't hold fart, since you like to say that to everybody who got a strong ideal to manipulate them to bow and accept peacefully...

But in a sense yes, people like me who got many principles, great projects or ideals live is a reality that makes a ridiculous and depressing travesty of these, worthless inutility, my principles are proven to be worse than nothing, but I have to defend these worthless things like a suicidal megalomaniac because I believe I'm not mistaken in a majority of what I write. But damn! I have to live one way or the other! And in a reality I hate! So one way or the other I'll adapt to it because absolute "stiffness" is a robotic thing and a good contributor to depression for life, and for me, healthy survival as a human is important whatever my revolt, but I don't know, maybe I'll do the sacrifice thing of Jesus, but it would be a suicidal battle and the result would be worse than anything as I would consider humanity a failure. So all these ways of doing things I dream about are not available to me, another way of saying it is that I can't be the man of my dreams because this reality doesn't permit it. So I do my best not to encourage it, while knowing that patience can't be eternal, one day, it's too late.

Now that you have an idea of how I see this reality and why it revolts me so much, I can say that the shelling of my seed is mostly done. "It's all unconstructive psycho stuff" some will say, yet, for good intentioned people, what I wrote is enough, what I had to express is there, people can build from that, strengthening the shell and create a seed to put in it. But maybe not today, with the machine so strong and its selection from pressure justified, the PMBBD machine so powerful and efficient that it can twist people, and any signification, or added worth I'm trying to give to life or love, to its own ends. Probably nothing good can come out of this in this terminally ready reality, apart from a good laugh, some meaningless conversation, entertainment. It is even highly probable that it can be used to reinforce this reality; people can profit from this for more PMBBD, for money etc.

If I am to have a chance at seeing something positive come out of this, I'll have to put a grossly made seed in the shell myself, close it and say how to use it and what to do with it, how to plant it, how to give it a chance to grow, how to make space for it and defend it too. It will be an example of what can be done but I'll try to make it a possibly functioning example because that is all you need; the possibility, if we discard a possibility that can be explored, which we like so much to do in our dividing and competitive ego environment, we are not worth our human status. Survive, explore possibilities, lose innocence, change reality, survive...Every possibility must be fully explored if they can be good; not doing so is skipping one of our human responsibilities.

And I know I've been kind of particularly hard with the "higher class", but I had to, why not? Presently there is no other reality, so I can give everybody the benefit of the doubt, but that will not be anymore when I'll set the base of a new reality, no justifications will be left. For now, ego reality covers the earth, and I could easily have gotten into it seriously, I'm no better than others, it's just that thing happens and coincide too, and now you're stuck with me.

We develop consciousness, independence and skills that animals can only dream about, but people who don't want to be people are not animals, they are dangerous monsters, whatever they are rich or poor, they must be controlled since they have human abilities in a destructive attitude of full ego. Evidently, it's of no use writing about this in a reality that embraced ego competition, I'll just waste my time describing something that works terminally well, everything inter-adapted, interrelated and interdependent. You can't attack an order of things that is critical to a reality's functioning without affecting the whole, and when the whole is human civilization...

What's more, you don't ask an old person in its self-created, at great energy cost, comfortable place to move its ass for change, particularly if you're born with a debt to him. That's why no philosophy is of use today if it is not done with another reality in mind, anything else is proven worthless, anybody who thinks he will change the fundamental way of this reality is totally mistaken, the ego-gods ideology is the way, you'll have to compete that, and the ego reality is what comes with it, and it's a default thing, you don't get rid of it!

It's like your ego, you can dream all you want about its destruction, it may give fabulous results, but it's always there waiting, if you're intelligent and control it well, it can give you pleasures not available to the biggest uncontrolled ego, but if you kill it you die. You could see ego reality somewhat in the same manner, many good things can come out of it, but it must be controlled justly by an external "consciousness force", call it a global equilibrium structure, because it is meant to grow ego at all cost. Now, even if we feed it fairly, it stays ego reality, that's why it is impossible to really evolve globally, ideologically, as you'll always be late, maybe with good stuff, but stuck under an ideal you'll encourage by being forced to take a position that will change your mind. Now, don't be mistaken, even if we stop ego reality we won't die out of it, ego reality is not a person, in fact, we'll live far longer, furthermore, another reality is not devoid of ego rewards, quite the contrary, the principle is that there are far more people who got their ego satisfied fairly, in sense.

Maybe ego reality must be affected externally; if good aliens passed by and showed us the wonders, expanse or perfection of their civilization, we could say, "wow! Look at what's possible!" you'd get some inspiration somewhere, or is it shame? We don't have that, and the only way to inspire ego reality is to develop another reality under fairness. And I never doubted that a single moment in all my life, I was maybe 23 when I started visualizing my way, and the first thing to ever cross my mind in my growing crazy revolt was exactly that; a vague end result, I started by the end and that end was a feeling I believed right and appropriate; another reality was not only possible, but absolutely necessary.

What's fantastic is that all through the years I knew all I was doing was for that old feeling, the game I started developing had, as a goal, to expose a simulation of it. However, I never actually wrote something about the reality in itself until now, but I never feared I was wrong, and the difficulty have been to build the transport for it, most of the time I passed was only the preparation, the justification, "the shell", while a reality description stayed a vague thing in my mind, a faraway thing I'd have to concentrate on someday, later in my life, like it was a detail; I never had a precise idea of what it would be, only a vague vision. So I may never have had a precise and complete vision of it, but you can't skip writing about it after having it in the back of your mind for so long.

So I'll make the simple principle basis description, and my responsibility toward all that will end with it. My project was the goal and this first part of the book (first 10 chapters) you just read is not my project, it is only the justification for it. I should've used all this time to perfect a new vision of things, but maybe I had to spend it to test myself, not only to justify and better identify evil, then I had to make understand that ego reality got too many problems to be the best way of humanity. So don't think I'll do something miraculous or inhuman or extraordinary after writing this book, what you must understand is that it was my end goal, that's the extraordinary thing I did, the rest for me must be normal life, and I'd appreciate a small job continuing in the same vein. And you what is your part?

For now, I say that if you have minimal notions of good and evil, which is not easy to achieve, particularly without much understanding about life, I'll give you that, then, if you want a tentative at increasing your value, instead of suicidating too fast, you can try doing it by fighting evil; such an attitude is very valuable to life, and to form a good civilization too. But you understand how an ego reality works, it kind of doesn't make sense, or I doesn't make sense, whichever you want. Me? Ah, you know my opinion, I'm the one making sense, sorry for you, and I have things to say, yes sir; you listen to my authority!

You know I see death as a step-up in life development; you don't want someone to win at the ridiculous "infinite" money ego philosophy lotto, add a family dynasty in the lot, a few other strikes of luck, and you got someone that may have been constructive toward civilization and life goals for a few years while being tremendously costly to the civilization for 100 000 years; enough time to use the means to get more means... But even if you lost it all and started working at something else than salivating at numbers for more means for it, then you were far better never have seen the light of the day, and that applies to many people of this reality; it's just that they don't have the brains to understand a minimum about fairness.

Thank we're not eternal, but we still found the means to use our limited lifespan to create eternal unfairness, so we are failing at one of the main reason for the existence of high consciousness, and in a sense, the reason for death too; changes to become better. And so ego people made pyramids for the like of themselves, seen as the main structures, systems, businesses, and industries of this reality, but you can see it as a competition to try profiting eternally from any new opportunity (cake), until you got a few gangs controlling each cake to systemized it eternal for the like of themselves, to the point that today it is a normal cultural trait; you wait for new cakes, like internet communication, to create more eternal pyramids, more condemnations, more tombs. And the problem is ego competition attitudes and systemized unfairness, people must understand that every cent they're not worth the value of is not theirs; it is at the wrong place. And your value is human, you cannot be worth more than a human, and your likes don't decide your worth, you have to pit it against everybody's worth, and that includes all your costs in all facets versus the advancement of life or good civilization goals.

And by the way, good people like fairness, they try to be between themselves, and if you put too much money in their hands, they won't complain that the "evil government takes more" it is logical to them that they distribute some around in their judgment of what is the good way to do it. For me, I don't even want to see more than 250 000$ a year, that's the maximal value I can give myself whatever, absolutely whatever, I do in life. If I can't feel well with this then I don't want to live, I'm better dead. That is for my personal comfort, sure that if you send me a trillion I'll immediately spend it all for the development of a new reality...

Now that causes a civilization condemnation with ego reality's democracy-capitalism business for sure, where you can argue that people decide, through PMBBD and hype, to spend "their" money, indebted to the comfort of throng of people and future people, the way they want it, which is a load of twisted crap spilling behind financials and rich people, in which they continually slip to end-up stinking in traffic needing help and more money.

But all my arguments will never be enough for fearful ego dreamers, even if you dropped them in an already working, full future, different reality, they'd try to manipulate to destroy it to replace it by a place where they can thrive in senseless luxuries and admiration. For such people nothing will ever be enough, except their death and they'll unconsciously try to bring a maximum of people with them in it. Among their ultimate argument will be the supposition that any change of reality will be like the death of humanity, like human pleasure and touches will stop existing and everybody will be robots who can't smile it out. Evidently, that is PMBBD, and the true death reality is ego pyramidal reality, so the contrary would be nearer the truth. Ego people would probably prefer the death of humanity than leaving space for and helping another reality or mentality, they will want to ruin the planet worthless before telling you to build your good reality on it.

Now, some of you must think that someone can't make something positive out of all this, but the question to me is very different; is it impossible or is it possible? And between the two there is a universe. Do you need me to explain that again? Possibilities remember? While not forgetting that most things are relative, there's an impossible land to cross between a possible thing that can be done and an impossible one which leads to guaranteed failure. Or maybe I could use your PMBBD against you by saying that nothing is impossible! And this reality is very good at giving the illusion that possible things are impossible and that impossible things are possible, for manipulation and profiting. The truth of things that exist in reality is revealed by time, but what are a few thousands of years in the course of infinity? And if you don't make another reality for some concepts to take form how will you know the truth? Maybe you should put that in your pipe for some decantation, and maybe your tolerating, adapting, peaceful and compassionate attitude full of PMBBD with frustration displaced everywhere, mixed with your ego attitude makes you a poor judge on the matter...just saying.

Many people will not want another reality, because things are all-right for them or getting better in their proud, happy, just, "loving", compassionate and, assuredly, best and eternally getting better reality, but I'll still describe what I would have needed to feel minimally good and secure in an "evolved" society, and I'm not talking about beauty cream evolution or gadgets or entertainment ("evolved" society? Modern or civilized society? I can't help but feel sick when people qualify this society as modern, or civilized, maybe on some superficial facets, but it still feels like a gross overstatement...

I can describe this hell as much as I want, most of you aint got the ability to imagine and believe in something else globally than what can be related to what you work for. It is all unconstructive, and it's surely not you that will construct from that. Since you can't invent or imagine or believe in such things, then I'll put doubt into you, a deadly doubt you'll have to live your whole life with, exposing your futility in regrets or ignorance. But I'm surely dreaming too colorful. To succeed, I must try to make you believe another reality is truly possible, a possibility, and that it can be made as good as the present reality, even if you'll probably do worse than nothing for it, you may even suppose I should do it all myself, which won't happens and you know why. To feel successful, I need to spark your mind, even if it only touches your consciousness, making it say it may be possible with some modifications; I don't care you imagine aliens living in the reality, once I'll be done, you'll say there is a possibility there, and then it will be your choice to take the next step or not.

And if you think no reality can satisfy the integrity of the criteria I imposed myself until now, you're mistaken, it will not be easy, but not hard in the way you think; hell is complicated. If you understand how I work, I've just set the minimal and maximal limitations I could use with principles I believe in because they are from neutral to good in my vision of it. I'm limiting my mind to find a scenario that can fit those limitations, within what is actually possible, and everything is there; destroy what is actually possible and lose the possibility, at least for now. It's a window thing, I say it is possible to open it with the tools that exist, but it is dependent from those tools; if they get destroyed the window may be condemned unless the means are taken to build back those tools, but yes, you could start everything over from 0, throw lighters in the pit and just take the basic philosophy of life instead of the ego-gods ego competition pyramidal philosophy for a difference.

For now, it's the first in the cake, the first on the women too, and the pressure is still for a world that will satisfy their every wishes. We are still at that initial step, no retard here, not even a serious effort at moving, and it may take all of humanity's effort to take the step, that's why there's always a best moment to take a step, things must coincide, and you don't want to wait so long that everything become a solid interdependence forming a multi-billion card pyramid, believed invincible in its ridiculous lifespan, the truth of which, or the stability of which, a farthing president can crash down, dependent on an eternal limitation of person, it cannot take the step, condemned.

We are missing steps, and I don't know what they are, true love probably, life too, we could say Jesus time could have been an expression of will from life for the love step, but even if Jesus was a good fellow, whatever how he saw it, religions and powerful people failed him for sure, minimally... We could say the same for Darwin about life with the same result. And it is in big part because they had to battle powerful controlling manipulators and profiteers almost alone, they must work alone against powerful adversity while fearful massive neutrals that are the true force taking the step, just defend their boss, or cower in their corner from reality difficulties, or fear for their garments; they need gods and so you'll fail. Instead you'll find adversity, even competition against things that don't compete.

A lot of things in life are done by steps, or passing a test obstacle, and far more than you think. You don't ask a tribe to make computers, and you wouldn't ask a new reality to be dropped in a cavern and be told "make your own computers"; a new reality is a step-up, from a reality that grew from natural forces, doing all kind of things I hate, I call it ego reality, an old, dirty, twisted and polluted and multi cancerous thing on hardcore sex PMBBD and hype overdrive, ready for the heart attack, but still thinking itself invincible while spending tremendous amount of means to keep an image of beauty and youth.

Furthermore, don't think your reality will morph to become something else, all it can do is give a temporary effort out of fear or get an inspiration before going back to its old ways stronger than ever, worse, if you take a good thing and morph it to fit, it will get twisted until it is worthless in effect, even irrecoverable. The only way out of it, to truly have a different way, is another reality where people personally choose as adults to be influenced by ego reality without ever influencing the youth, which can be done because it is another reality.

However, ego reality will have to do it, it will have to free vast land space to do it, and accept fair laws for its expansion while letting the new reality control by itself ego reality's influences to get the new, fundamentally different, mentality thriving successfully. If not, then I only see total war to stop ego reality and prevent it from condemning humanity to the death. Whatever the means it uses to refuse, which can be PMBBD, it will be its decision, or the decision of its selection, thus it will be responsible if it prefers the path of war and destruction.

Next chapter is where I'll describe how someone like me can be happy. And don't get all excited, it will only be a few hundred pages crude and incomplete example, probably dysfunctional, of another possible reality, and since nothing is ever enough, I'll do the worst in the chapter after that where I'll try to explore how it can be made to exist, whatever peacefully or with war, yes war, even if "peace" people think they are living in an ego reality where war doesn't exist. War is intrinsic to this reality, almost all country delimitations are unjustly made from it, the country competition enforces the building of war machine, and there is no country that can exist without guns, so wake-up! You are just lucky to live in one with a strong military machine. And don't think I'm for war, I just look at the reality in the face under the mask it wears for you, I don't dream war will end in this reality that possess the earth because I'm realist even if I'm idealist too.

And to put the last nail in your "peace" and "love" stuff thing, I'll describe how this new reality will end war, even if there is nothing to stop gangs of people battling each other in ego reality, and the summum is that ego reality's power structures may accept it, they may even be waiting for it, even if I demonized it.

I told you everybody is innocent, people, even the rich and powerful are grown and affected by all the PMBBD around; if you got an ability to become rich this reality will boost that in you. You got to become human in this reality and most of today's people are a result of old stuff boosted through history at incredible PMBBD levels, so many may be ready to try something else if they got the abilities to understand the justifications for it. Even if it's not the case for many parts of it, there are evil and there are good frustrated in an evil situation, even if my judgment on such matter will always be very limited from the pile of PMBBD. And judging good and evil is very relative and vague, I see it as a balance of everything you are and all your effects, where neutrality doesn't exist; you're weighting either toward good or evil, I judge someone as evil when it is evident to me that the balance on the evil side almost touch the ground, that way I'm almost guaranteed not to be mistaken.

So no project's too big, and whatever my doubt, ego reality may accept to do things peacefully, it may accept true love and a developing vision of life, by itself, because it can be made and it's not a perversion, it may have been waiting eternally, even preparing itself for it unconsciously. But yes it may have to battle many rebarbative elements for it, it wouldn't if everybody was not divided in competition and PMBBD, but it is in the best interest of everybody to limit that and give birth to a new reality associated without war, which I see as a last option for a failed reality. We are humans and we decide, and we can do that in advance, like deciding to make war to any view that may have a chance to make things humanly better. So we decide and if we already decided that only war could change fundamentals and we spent most of our energy for arming the planet to the teeth, then what can I say? Peace? Love? That many years of heavy and costly diplomacy and socialization should give results if everybody had good intents and if heavy socialization is so good no?

And there's not only the powerful that may use their means for it, this reality is a whole, I attacked everybody, every kind of people to prove it, somewhat proportionally to their individual powers and global powers too. People will choose their side, I want another reality. And I'll make drawings too, I can't explain everything without these. It will spring from my vision of things, it is a continuation, still more arguments, and it is far from perfect, it's just a sketchy start, a basis. So forget about a precise recipe of ingredients to drop in a precise order at a precise time to make pizza, if I could do that I wouldn't need people, but robots or slaves. I'll paint my vision with words instead. Welcome to the seed creation process of my project, my paradise, my ideal reality.
