A social institution that has one of the biggest
impacts on society is the economy.
And you might think of the economy in terms
of numbers – unemployment numbers, GDPs, or
whatever the stock market is doing today.
But while we often talk about it in numerical
terms, the economy is really made of people!
It’s the social institution that organizes
all production, consumption, and trade of
goods in a society.
And there are lots of different ways in which
stuff can be made, exchanged, and used.
Think capitalism, or socialism.
These economic systems – and the
economic revolutions that created them –
shape the way that people live their lives.
[Theme Music]
Economies can vary a lot from one society to the
next, but in any given economy, you can typically
see production split into three sectors.
The primary sector extracts raw materials
from natural environments – so, workers like
farmers or miners would fit well here.
The secondary sector takes raw materials and
transforms them into manufactured goods.
So, someone in the primary sector may extract
oil from the earth, but someone in the secondary
sector refines the petroleum into gasoline.
And then the tertiary sector is the part of
the economy that involves services rather
than goods.
You know, doing things, rather than making
things.
But, this system is actually pretty complicated.
Or at least, more sophisticated than the way
things used to be for much of human history.
So, how did we get from a world where people worked
to produce just what they needed for their families,
to one with all these sectors that have to work together?
To understand that, we need to back up a little
– about 12,000 years.
The first big economic change was the agrarian
revolution.
When people first learned how to
domesticate plants and animals,
it ushered in a new agricultural economy that was much
more productive than hunter-gatherer societies were.
Farming helped societies build surpluses,
which meant not everyone had to spend their
time producing food.
This, in turn, led to major developments like
permanent settlements, trade networks, and
population growth.
Now, let’s go to the Thought Bubble to
discuss the second major economic revolution:
the industrial revolution of the 1800s.
With the rise of industry came new economic
tools, like steam engines, manufacturing,
and mass production.
Factories popped up, changing how work functioned.
Now, instead of working at home, where
people worked for their family by making
things from start to finish,
they began working as wage laborers and
becoming more specialized in their skills.
Overall productivity went up, standards of living rose,
and people had access to a wider variety of goods
thanks to mass production – all good things.
But every economic revolution comes with economic
casualties.
The workers in the factories – who were
mainly poor women and children – worked
in dangerous conditions for low wages.
There’s a reason that the industrialists
of the 19th century were known as robber barons:
with more productivity came greater wealth,
but also greater economic inequality.
So, in the late 19th century, labor unions
began to form.
These organizations of workers sought to improve
wages and working conditions through collective
action, strikes, and negotiations.
Inspired by Marxist principles, labor unions
are partly to thank for us now having things
like minimum wage laws,
reasonable working hours, and regulations
to protect the safety of workers.
Thanks Thought Bubble.
So, the industrial revolution was an incredibly
big deal, when it came to the changes that it
brought to both economies and societies.
And there’s a third revolution we should
talk about too – one that’s happening right now.
But before we get to that, we should pause and
explore two competing economic models that sprung
up around the time of the industrial revolution,
as economic capital became more and more
important to the production of goods.
Pretty sure you’ve heard of them!
And possibly have strong opinions about them!
They’re capitalism and socialism.
Capitalism is a system in which all natural resources
and means of production are privately owned.
And it emphasizes profit-seeking and competition
as the main drivers of efficiency.
If you own a business, you need to out-perform
your competitors if you're going to succeed.
So you’re incentivized to be more efficient
– by improving the quality of your product,
and reducing your prices.
This is what economist Adam Smith in the 1770s
called the “Invisible Hand” of the market.
The idea is that if you just leave a capitalist economy
alone, consumers will regulate things themselves, by
selecting goods and services that provide the best value.
But, in practice, an economy doesn’t work
very well if it’s left completely on auto-pilot.
There are lots of sectors where a hands-off approach
can lead to what economists call “market failures,”
where an unregulated market ends up
allocating goods and services inefficiently.
A monopoly, for example, is a kind of market
failure.
When a company has no competition for
customers, it can charge higher prices without
worrying about losing customers.
That, as economic allocations go, is really
inefficient, at least on the consumer end.
So, in situations like these, a government
might step in and force the company to break up
into smaller companies to increase competition.
Market failures like this are why most
countries, the United States included, are
not purely capitalist societies.
For example, the US federal and state governments
own and operate a number of businesses, like schools,
the Postal Service, and the military.
Governments also set minimum wages, create
workplace safety laws, and provide social support
programs like unemployment benefits and food stamps.
Government plays an even larger role, however,
in socialism.
In a socialist system, the means of production
are under collective ownership.
Socialism rejects capitalism’s private-property
and hands-off approaches.
Instead, here, property is owned by the
government and allocated to all citizens, not
just those with the money to afford it.
Socialism emphasizes collective goals, expecting
everyone to work for the common good, and placing a
higher value on meeting everyone’s basic needs than on
individual profit.
When Karl Marx first wrote about socialism,
he viewed it as a stepping stone toward communism,
a political and economic system in which all
members of a society are socially equal.
But of course, in practice, this hasn’t played out
in the countries that have modelled their economies
on socialism, like Cuba, North Korea, China,
and the former USSR.
Why?
Well, Marx hoped that, as economic differences
vanished in communist society, the government
would simply wither away and disappear.
But, that never happened.
If anything, the opposite did.
Rather than freeing the proletariat from inequality,
the massive power of the government in these
states gave enormous wealth, power, and privilege
to political elites, retrenching inequalities along political
– rather than strictly economic – lines.
At the same time, capitalist countries economically
out-performed their socialist counterparts,
contributing to the unrest that eventually
led to the downfall of the USSR.
Before the fall of the Soviet Union, the average output in capitalist countries was about $13,500 per person, which was almost three times that in the Soviet countries.
But there are downsides to capitalism, too
– namely greater income inequality.
A study of European capitalist countries
and socialist countries in the 1970s
found that the income ratio between the top 5%
and the bottom 5% in capitalist countries was about
10:1, whereas in socialist countries it was 5:1.
We could fill whole episodes about the
merits of each economic model – and in fact,
we did in Crash Course World History.
There are many more questions we could answer
about how societies build their economic systems.
But in any case, those two models aren’t
the end of the story.
Because: we’re living in the middle of the economic
revolution that followed the industrial revolution.
Ours is the time of the information revolution.
Technology has reduced the role of human labor,
and shifted it from a manufacturing-based economy
to one based on service work and the
production of ideas rather than goods.
And this has had a lot of residual effects
on our economy.
Computers and other technologies are beginning
to replace many jobs, by making it easier to either
automate them or send them offshore.
And we’ve also seen a decline in union membership.
Nowadays, most unions are for public sector
jobs, like teachers.
So what do jobs in a post-industrial society
look like?
Well, agricultural jobs, which once were a
massive part of the American labor force,
have fallen drastically over the last century.
While 40% of the labor force was involved
in the agricultural sector in 1900, only about
2% of workers today work in farming.
Similarly, manufacturing jobs, which were the
lifeblood of the US economy for much of the 20th
century, have also declined in the last 30 years.
So, the US economy began with many workers serving
in either the primary and secondary economic sectors,
but now, much of the US economy is centered
on the tertiary sector, or the service industry.
The service industry makes up 85% of
jobs in the US,
including everything from administrative
assistants to nurses to teachers to lawyers to
everyone who made this Crash Course video for you.
Now, that’s a really big and diverse group.
That’s because the tertiary sector – like
all the economic sectors we’ve been discussing
– is defined mainly by what it produces,
rather than what kinds of jobs it includes.
So, sociologists have a way of distinguishing
between types of jobs, based more on the social
status and compensation that come with them:
There’s the primary labor market and the
secondary labor market.
The primary labor market includes jobs that provide
lots of benefits to workers, like high incomes, job
security, health insurance and retirement packages.
These are white collar professions, like doctors
or accountants or engineers.
Secondary labor market jobs provide fewer
benefits and include lower-skilled jobs and
lower-level service sector jobs.
They tend to pay less, have more unpredictable
schedules, and typically don’t offer benefits 
like health insurance.
They also tend to have less job security.
So what’s next for capitalism, or socialism?
Well, no one knows what the next economic
revolution is going to look like.
But I can tell you that, nowadays, a key part
of both our economic and political landscape
is corporations.
Corporations are defined as organizations
that exist as legal entities and have liabilities
that are separate from its members.
So, they’re their own things.
And more and more these days, corporations
are operating across national boundaries,
which means that the future of the US economy
– and most countries’ economies – will
play out on a global scale.
Today we discussed how economies can be broken
down into the primary, secondary, and tertiary sectors.
We discussed the three stages of economic revolution
that brought us to the modern post-industrial era.
And in the middle there, we talked about two
types of economic models: capitalism and socialism.
Crash Course Sociology is filmed in the Dr.
Cheryl C. Kinney Studio in Missoula, MT, and
it’s made with the help of all of these
nice people.
Our animation team is Thought Cafe and Crash
Course is made with Adobe Creative Cloud.
If you'd like to keep Crash Course free for
everyone, forever, you can support the series
at Patreon, a crowdfunding platform that allows
you to support the content you love.
Thank you to all of our patrons for making
Crash Course possible with their continued support.
