IS
IS MOVING
IS MOVING ALONG
IS MOVING ALONG JUST
IS MOVING ALONG JUST FINE.
IS MOVING ALONG JUST FINE.
>>>
IS MOVING ALONG JUST FINE.
>>> LET'S
IS MOVING ALONG JUST FINE.
>>> LET'S GET
IS MOVING ALONG JUST FINE.
>>> LET'S GET TO
IS MOVING ALONG JUST FINE.
>>> LET'S GET TO OUR
IS MOVING ALONG JUST FINE.
>>> LET'S GET TO OUR TOP
IS MOVING ALONG JUST FINE.
>>> LET'S GET TO OUR TOP STORY,
>>> LET'S GET TO OUR TOP STORY,
>>> LET'S GET TO OUR TOP STORY,
200
>>> LET'S GET TO OUR TOP STORY,
200 PARENTS
>>> LET'S GET TO OUR TOP STORY,
200 PARENTS PLAN
>>> LET'S GET TO OUR TOP STORY,
200 PARENTS PLAN TO
>>> LET'S GET TO OUR TOP STORY,
200 PARENTS PLAN TO GATHER
>>> LET'S GET TO OUR TOP STORY,
200 PARENTS PLAN TO GATHER WITH
200 PARENTS PLAN TO GATHER WITH
200 PARENTS PLAN TO GATHER WITH
MATCHING
200 PARENTS PLAN TO GATHER WITH
MATCHING SHIRTS,
200 PARENTS PLAN TO GATHER WITH
MATCHING SHIRTS, BANNERS
200 PARENTS PLAN TO GATHER WITH
MATCHING SHIRTS, BANNERS AND
MATCHING SHIRTS, BANNERS AND
MATCHING SHIRTS, BANNERS AND
SIGNS.
SIGNS.
SIGNS.
THEY
SIGNS.
THEY ARE
SIGNS.
THEY ARE SUPPORTING
SIGNS.
THEY ARE SUPPORTING A
SIGNS.
THEY ARE SUPPORTING A FEDERAL
THEY ARE SUPPORTING A FEDERAL
THEY ARE SUPPORTING A FEDERAL
LAWSUIT
THEY ARE SUPPORTING A FEDERAL
LAWSUIT WHICH
THEY ARE SUPPORTING A FEDERAL
LAWSUIT WHICH CHALLENGES
LAWSUIT WHICH CHALLENGES
LAWSUIT WHICH CHALLENGES
MINNESOTA'S
LAWSUIT WHICH CHALLENGES
MINNESOTA'S CHILD
LAWSUIT WHICH CHALLENGES
MINNESOTA'S CHILD PROTECTION
MINNESOTA'S CHILD PROTECTION
MINNESOTA'S CHILD PROTECTION
LAWS.
LAWS.
LAWS.
A
LAWS.
A JUDGE
LAWS.
A JUDGE WILL
LAWS.
A JUDGE WILL START
LAWS.
A JUDGE WILL START HEARING
LAWS.
A JUDGE WILL START HEARING THE
A JUDGE WILL START HEARING THE
A JUDGE WILL START HEARING THE
CASE
A JUDGE WILL START HEARING THE
CASE IN
A JUDGE WILL START HEARING THE
CASE IN A
A JUDGE WILL START HEARING THE
CASE IN A FEW
A JUDGE WILL START HEARING THE
CASE IN A FEW HOURS,
A JUDGE WILL START HEARING THE
CASE IN A FEW HOURS, KIYA
CASE IN A FEW HOURS, KIYA
CASE IN A FEW HOURS, KIYA
EDWARDS
CASE IN A FEW HOURS, KIYA
EDWARDS IS
CASE IN A FEW HOURS, KIYA
EDWARDS IS LIVE
CASE IN A FEW HOURS, KIYA
EDWARDS IS LIVE OUTSIDE
CASE IN A FEW HOURS, KIYA
EDWARDS IS LIVE OUTSIDE THE
EDWARDS IS LIVE OUTSIDE THE
EDWARDS IS LIVE OUTSIDE THE
COURTHOUSE
EDWARDS IS LIVE OUTSIDE THE
COURTHOUSE IN
EDWARDS IS LIVE OUTSIDE THE
COURTHOUSE IN ST.
EDWARDS IS LIVE OUTSIDE THE
COURTHOUSE IN ST. PAUL.
COURTHOUSE IN ST. PAUL.
COURTHOUSE IN ST. PAUL.
GOOD
COURTHOUSE IN ST. PAUL.
GOOD MORNING.
GOOD MORNING.
GOOD MORNING.
>>GOOD
GOOD MORNING.
>>GOOD MORNING.
>>GOOD MORNING.
>>GOOD MORNING.
THE
>>GOOD MORNING.
THE ASSOCIATION
>>GOOD MORNING.
THE ASSOCIATION THAT
>>GOOD MORNING.
THE ASSOCIATION THAT IS
>>GOOD MORNING.
THE ASSOCIATION THAT IS SUING
THE ASSOCIATION THAT IS SUING
THE ASSOCIATION THAT IS SUING
IS
THE ASSOCIATION THAT IS SUING
IS MADE
THE ASSOCIATION THAT IS SUING
IS MADE UP
THE ASSOCIATION THAT IS SUING
IS MADE UP OF
THE ASSOCIATION THAT IS SUING
IS MADE UP OF ALMOST
THE ASSOCIATION THAT IS SUING
IS MADE UP OF ALMOST 5000
IS MADE UP OF ALMOST 5000
IS MADE UP OF ALMOST 5000
PARENTS.
PARENTS.
PARENTS.
200
PARENTS.
200 OF
PARENTS.
200 OF THEM
PARENTS.
200 OF THEM WILL
PARENTS.
200 OF THEM WILL BE
PARENTS.
200 OF THEM WILL BE MEETING
200 OF THEM WILL BE MEETING
200 OF THEM WILL BE MEETING
RIGHT
200 OF THEM WILL BE MEETING
RIGHT HERE
200 OF THEM WILL BE MEETING
RIGHT HERE AT
200 OF THEM WILL BE MEETING
RIGHT HERE AT 8:00
200 OF THEM WILL BE MEETING
RIGHT HERE AT 8:00 THIS
RIGHT HERE AT 8:00 THIS
RIGHT HERE AT 8:00 THIS
MORNING,
RIGHT HERE AT 8:00 THIS
MORNING, AFTER
RIGHT HERE AT 8:00 THIS
MORNING, AFTER THAT
RIGHT HERE AT 8:00 THIS
MORNING, AFTER THAT ORAL
MORNING, AFTER THAT ORAL
MORNING, AFTER THAT ORAL
ARGUMENTS
MORNING, AFTER THAT ORAL
ARGUMENTS WILL
MORNING, AFTER THAT ORAL
ARGUMENTS WILL BEGIN.
ARGUMENTS WILL BEGIN.
ARGUMENTS WILL BEGIN.
HERE
ARGUMENTS WILL BEGIN.
HERE ARE
ARGUMENTS WILL BEGIN.
HERE ARE SOME
ARGUMENTS WILL BEGIN.
HERE ARE SOME OF
ARGUMENTS WILL BEGIN.
HERE ARE SOME OF THE
ARGUMENTS WILL BEGIN.
HERE ARE SOME OF THE KEY
ARGUMENTS WILL BEGIN.
HERE ARE SOME OF THE KEY POINTS
HERE ARE SOME OF THE KEY POINTS
HERE ARE SOME OF THE KEY POINTS
WE
HERE ARE SOME OF THE KEY POINTS
WE CAN
HERE ARE SOME OF THE KEY POINTS
WE CAN EXPECT
HERE ARE SOME OF THE KEY POINTS
WE CAN EXPECT TO
HERE ARE SOME OF THE KEY POINTS
WE CAN EXPECT TO HEAR
HERE ARE SOME OF THE KEY POINTS
WE CAN EXPECT TO HEAR ALONG
WE CAN EXPECT TO HEAR ALONG
WE CAN EXPECT TO HEAR ALONG
WITH
WE CAN EXPECT TO HEAR ALONG
WITH THE
WE CAN EXPECT TO HEAR ALONG
WITH THE STATE'S
WE CAN EXPECT TO HEAR ALONG
WITH THE STATE'S RESPONSE.
WITH THE STATE'S RESPONSE.
WITH THE STATE'S RESPONSE.
>>
WITH THE STATE'S RESPONSE.
>> Reporter:
WITH THE STATE'S RESPONSE.
>> Reporter: --
WITH THE STATE'S RESPONSE.
>> Reporter: -- JAMES,
WITH THE STATE'S RESPONSE.
>> Reporter: -- JAMES, MOTHER
>> Reporter: -- JAMES, MOTHER
>> Reporter: -- JAMES, MOTHER
OF
>> Reporter: -- JAMES, MOTHER
OF THREE
>> Reporter: -- JAMES, MOTHER
OF THREE BUT
>> Reporter: -- JAMES, MOTHER
OF THREE BUT FOR
>> Reporter: -- JAMES, MOTHER
OF THREE BUT FOR ABOUT
>> Reporter: -- JAMES, MOTHER
OF THREE BUT FOR ABOUT A
>> Reporter: -- JAMES, MOTHER
OF THREE BUT FOR ABOUT A WEEK
OF THREE BUT FOR ABOUT A WEEK
OF THREE BUT FOR ABOUT A WEEK
SHE
OF THREE BUT FOR ABOUT A WEEK
SHE WAS
OF THREE BUT FOR ABOUT A WEEK
SHE WAS A
OF THREE BUT FOR ABOUT A WEEK
SHE WAS A MOTHER
OF THREE BUT FOR ABOUT A WEEK
SHE WAS A MOTHER OF
OF THREE BUT FOR ABOUT A WEEK
SHE WAS A MOTHER OF NONE.
SHE WAS A MOTHER OF NONE.
SHE WAS A MOTHER OF NONE.
>>THEY
SHE WAS A MOTHER OF NONE.
>>THEY DID
SHE WAS A MOTHER OF NONE.
>>THEY DID NOT
SHE WAS A MOTHER OF NONE.
>>THEY DID NOT TELL
SHE WAS A MOTHER OF NONE.
>>THEY DID NOT TELL ME
SHE WAS A MOTHER OF NONE.
>>THEY DID NOT TELL ME WHERE
SHE WAS A MOTHER OF NONE.
>>THEY DID NOT TELL ME WHERE MY
>>THEY DID NOT TELL ME WHERE MY
>>THEY DID NOT TELL ME WHERE MY
CHILDREN
>>THEY DID NOT TELL ME WHERE MY
CHILDREN WERE
>>THEY DID NOT TELL ME WHERE MY
CHILDREN WERE AND
>>THEY DID NOT TELL ME WHERE MY
CHILDREN WERE AND THEY
>>THEY DID NOT TELL ME WHERE MY
CHILDREN WERE AND THEY WOULD
CHILDREN WERE AND THEY WOULD
CHILDREN WERE AND THEY WOULD
NOT
CHILDREN WERE AND THEY WOULD
NOT ALLOW
CHILDREN WERE AND THEY WOULD
NOT ALLOW ME
CHILDREN WERE AND THEY WOULD
NOT ALLOW ME TO
CHILDREN WERE AND THEY WOULD
NOT ALLOW ME TO SEE
CHILDREN WERE AND THEY WOULD
NOT ALLOW ME TO SEE MY
CHILDREN WERE AND THEY WOULD
NOT ALLOW ME TO SEE MY CHILDREN.
NOT ALLOW ME TO SEE MY CHILDREN.
NOT ALLOW ME TO SEE MY CHILDREN.
>>
NOT ALLOW ME TO SEE MY CHILDREN.
>> Reporter:
NOT ALLOW ME TO SEE MY CHILDREN.
>> Reporter: AN
NOT ALLOW ME TO SEE MY CHILDREN.
>> Reporter: AN ARGUMENT
>> Reporter: AN ARGUMENT
>> Reporter: AN ARGUMENT
BETWEEN
>> Reporter: AN ARGUMENT
BETWEEN FAMILY
>> Reporter: AN ARGUMENT
BETWEEN FAMILY MEMBERS,
>> Reporter: AN ARGUMENT
BETWEEN FAMILY MEMBERS, NOT
>> Reporter: AN ARGUMENT
BETWEEN FAMILY MEMBERS, NOT HER
BETWEEN FAMILY MEMBERS, NOT HER
BETWEEN FAMILY MEMBERS, NOT HER
,
BETWEEN FAMILY MEMBERS, NOT HER
, PROMPTED
BETWEEN FAMILY MEMBERS, NOT HER
, PROMPTED POLICE
BETWEEN FAMILY MEMBERS, NOT HER
, PROMPTED POLICE TO
BETWEEN FAMILY MEMBERS, NOT HER
, PROMPTED POLICE TO PULL
BETWEEN FAMILY MEMBERS, NOT HER
, PROMPTED POLICE TO PULL HER
, PROMPTED POLICE TO PULL HER
, PROMPTED POLICE TO PULL HER
KIDS
, PROMPTED POLICE TO PULL HER
KIDS FROM
, PROMPTED POLICE TO PULL HER
KIDS FROM SCHOOL.
KIDS FROM SCHOOL.
KIDS FROM SCHOOL.
>>THERE
KIDS FROM SCHOOL.
>>THERE WAS
KIDS FROM SCHOOL.
>>THERE WAS NO
KIDS FROM SCHOOL.
>>THERE WAS NO HARM
KIDS FROM SCHOOL.
>>THERE WAS NO HARM TOWARDS
KIDS FROM SCHOOL.
>>THERE WAS NO HARM TOWARDS MY
>>THERE WAS NO HARM TOWARDS MY
>>THERE WAS NO HARM TOWARDS MY
CHILDREN.
CHILDREN.
CHILDREN.
>>
CHILDREN.
>> Reporter:
CHILDREN.
>> Reporter: SHE
CHILDREN.
>> Reporter: SHE FOUGHT
CHILDREN.
>> Reporter: SHE FOUGHT IT
CHILDREN.
>> Reporter: SHE FOUGHT IT AND
>> Reporter: SHE FOUGHT IT AND
>> Reporter: SHE FOUGHT IT AND
SHE
>> Reporter: SHE FOUGHT IT AND
SHE WON.
SHE WON.
SHE WON.
SHE
SHE WON.
SHE AND
SHE WON.
SHE AND THOUSANDS
SHE WON.
SHE AND THOUSANDS OF
SHE WON.
SHE AND THOUSANDS OF PARENTS
SHE AND THOUSANDS OF PARENTS
SHE AND THOUSANDS OF PARENTS
ARE
SHE AND THOUSANDS OF PARENTS
ARE HOPING
SHE AND THOUSANDS OF PARENTS
ARE HOPING TO
SHE AND THOUSANDS OF PARENTS
ARE HOPING TO WIN
SHE AND THOUSANDS OF PARENTS
ARE HOPING TO WIN ANOTHER
SHE AND THOUSANDS OF PARENTS
ARE HOPING TO WIN ANOTHER CASE,
ARE HOPING TO WIN ANOTHER CASE,
ARE HOPING TO WIN ANOTHER CASE,
A
ARE HOPING TO WIN ANOTHER CASE,
A FEDERAL
ARE HOPING TO WIN ANOTHER CASE,
A FEDERAL LAWSUIT
ARE HOPING TO WIN ANOTHER CASE,
A FEDERAL LAWSUIT AGAINST
A FEDERAL LAWSUIT AGAINST
A FEDERAL LAWSUIT AGAINST
AGENCIES
A FEDERAL LAWSUIT AGAINST
AGENCIES ENFORCING
A FEDERAL LAWSUIT AGAINST
AGENCIES ENFORCING THE
AGENCIES ENFORCING THE
AGENCIES ENFORCING THE
MINNESOTA
AGENCIES ENFORCING THE
MINNESOTA CHILD
AGENCIES ENFORCING THE
MINNESOTA CHILD PROTECTION
MINNESOTA CHILD PROTECTION
MINNESOTA CHILD PROTECTION
LAWS.
LAWS.
LAWS.
>>MINNESOTA
LAWS.
>>MINNESOTA IS
LAWS.
>>MINNESOTA IS REMOVING
>>MINNESOTA IS REMOVING
>>MINNESOTA IS REMOVING
CHILDREN
>>MINNESOTA IS REMOVING
CHILDREN UNNECESSARILY
>>MINNESOTA IS REMOVING
CHILDREN UNNECESSARILY FROM
>>MINNESOTA IS REMOVING
CHILDREN UNNECESSARILY FROM THE
CHILDREN UNNECESSARILY FROM THE
CHILDREN UNNECESSARILY FROM THE
HOME
CHILDREN UNNECESSARILY FROM THE
HOME WHEN
CHILDREN UNNECESSARILY FROM THE
HOME WHEN THERE
CHILDREN UNNECESSARILY FROM THE
HOME WHEN THERE IS
CHILDREN UNNECESSARILY FROM THE
HOME WHEN THERE IS NO
CHILDREN UNNECESSARILY FROM THE
HOME WHEN THERE IS NO HARM
CHILDREN UNNECESSARILY FROM THE
HOME WHEN THERE IS NO HARM TO
HOME WHEN THERE IS NO HARM TO
HOME WHEN THERE IS NO HARM TO
THE
HOME WHEN THERE IS NO HARM TO
THE CHILDREN.
THE CHILDREN.
THE CHILDREN.
>>
THE CHILDREN.
>> Reporter:
THE CHILDREN.
>> Reporter: GROUP
THE CHILDREN.
>> Reporter: GROUP LEADER,
>> Reporter: GROUP LEADER,
>> Reporter: GROUP LEADER,
DWIGHT
>> Reporter: GROUP LEADER,
DWIGHT MITCHELL,
>> Reporter: GROUP LEADER,
DWIGHT MITCHELL, POINTS
>> Reporter: GROUP LEADER,
DWIGHT MITCHELL, POINTS TO
DWIGHT MITCHELL, POINTS TO
DWIGHT MITCHELL, POINTS TO
ANOTHER
DWIGHT MITCHELL, POINTS TO
ANOTHER EXAMPLE.
ANOTHER EXAMPLE.
ANOTHER EXAMPLE.
>>
ANOTHER EXAMPLE.
>> ON
ANOTHER EXAMPLE.
>> ON THE
ANOTHER EXAMPLE.
>> ON THE PETITION
ANOTHER EXAMPLE.
>> ON THE PETITION IT'S
ANOTHER EXAMPLE.
>> ON THE PETITION IT'S AT
ANOTHER EXAMPLE.
>> ON THE PETITION IT'S AT HER
>> ON THE PETITION IT'S AT HER
>> ON THE PETITION IT'S AT HER
HOUSE
>> ON THE PETITION IT'S AT HER
HOUSE WAS
>> ON THE PETITION IT'S AT HER
HOUSE WAS MESSY.
HOUSE WAS MESSY.
HOUSE WAS MESSY.
I
HOUSE WAS MESSY.
I SAID
HOUSE WAS MESSY.
I SAID YOU
HOUSE WAS MESSY.
I SAID YOU ARE
HOUSE WAS MESSY.
I SAID YOU ARE TAKING
HOUSE WAS MESSY.
I SAID YOU ARE TAKING A
HOUSE WAS MESSY.
I SAID YOU ARE TAKING A CHILD
I SAID YOU ARE TAKING A CHILD
I SAID YOU ARE TAKING A CHILD
BECAUSE
I SAID YOU ARE TAKING A CHILD
BECAUSE THE
I SAID YOU ARE TAKING A CHILD
BECAUSE THE HOUSE
I SAID YOU ARE TAKING A CHILD
BECAUSE THE HOUSE IS
I SAID YOU ARE TAKING A CHILD
BECAUSE THE HOUSE IS MESSY?
BECAUSE THE HOUSE IS MESSY?
BECAUSE THE HOUSE IS MESSY?
>>
BECAUSE THE HOUSE IS MESSY?
>> Reporter:
BECAUSE THE HOUSE IS MESSY?
>> Reporter: ATTORNEYS
BECAUSE THE HOUSE IS MESSY?
>> Reporter: ATTORNEYS WILL
>> Reporter: ATTORNEYS WILL
>> Reporter: ATTORNEYS WILL
ARGUE
>> Reporter: ATTORNEYS WILL
ARGUE THAT
>> Reporter: ATTORNEYS WILL
ARGUE THAT LAWS
>> Reporter: ATTORNEYS WILL
ARGUE THAT LAWS INVOLVING
>> Reporter: ATTORNEYS WILL
ARGUE THAT LAWS INVOLVING THE
ARGUE THAT LAWS INVOLVING THE
ARGUE THAT LAWS INVOLVING THE
FOSTER
ARGUE THAT LAWS INVOLVING THE
FOSTER CARE
ARGUE THAT LAWS INVOLVING THE
FOSTER CARE SYSTEM
ARGUE THAT LAWS INVOLVING THE
FOSTER CARE SYSTEM ARE
FOSTER CARE SYSTEM ARE
FOSTER CARE SYSTEM ARE
UNCONSTITUTIONAL,
FOSTER CARE SYSTEM ARE
UNCONSTITUTIONAL, THERE
FOSTER CARE SYSTEM ARE
UNCONSTITUTIONAL, THERE SHOULD
UNCONSTITUTIONAL, THERE SHOULD
UNCONSTITUTIONAL, THERE SHOULD
BE
UNCONSTITUTIONAL, THERE SHOULD
BE EVIDENCE
UNCONSTITUTIONAL, THERE SHOULD
BE EVIDENCE OF
UNCONSTITUTIONAL, THERE SHOULD
BE EVIDENCE OF CHILD
UNCONSTITUTIONAL, THERE SHOULD
BE EVIDENCE OF CHILD ABUSE
BE EVIDENCE OF CHILD ABUSE
BE EVIDENCE OF CHILD ABUSE
BEFORE
BE EVIDENCE OF CHILD ABUSE
BEFORE CHILD
BE EVIDENCE OF CHILD ABUSE
BEFORE CHILD PROTECTION
BEFORE CHILD PROTECTION
BEFORE CHILD PROTECTION
SERVICES
BEFORE CHILD PROTECTION
SERVICES REMOVES
BEFORE CHILD PROTECTION
SERVICES REMOVES A
BEFORE CHILD PROTECTION
SERVICES REMOVES A CHILD
BEFORE CHILD PROTECTION
SERVICES REMOVES A CHILD FROM
SERVICES REMOVES A CHILD FROM
SERVICES REMOVES A CHILD FROM
THE
SERVICES REMOVES A CHILD FROM
THE HOME.
THE HOME.
THE HOME.
WHAT
THE HOME.
WHAT DOES
THE HOME.
WHAT DOES THE
THE HOME.
WHAT DOES THE STATE
THE HOME.
WHAT DOES THE STATE HAVE
THE HOME.
WHAT DOES THE STATE HAVE TO
THE HOME.
WHAT DOES THE STATE HAVE TO SAY?
WHAT DOES THE STATE HAVE TO SAY?
WHAT DOES THE STATE HAVE TO SAY?
THE
WHAT DOES THE STATE HAVE TO SAY?
THE DEPARTMENT
WHAT DOES THE STATE HAVE TO SAY?
THE DEPARTMENT OF
WHAT DOES THE STATE HAVE TO SAY?
THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN
THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN
THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN
SERVICES
THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN
SERVICES COMMISSIONER
THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN
SERVICES COMMISSIONER SAYS
SERVICES COMMISSIONER SAYS
SERVICES COMMISSIONER SAYS
QUOTE,
SERVICES COMMISSIONER SAYS
QUOTE, IT
SERVICES COMMISSIONER SAYS
QUOTE, IT IS
SERVICES COMMISSIONER SAYS
QUOTE, IT IS A
SERVICES COMMISSIONER SAYS
QUOTE, IT IS A HARD
SERVICES COMMISSIONER SAYS
QUOTE, IT IS A HARD SITUATION
QUOTE, IT IS A HARD SITUATION
QUOTE, IT IS A HARD SITUATION
WHEN
QUOTE, IT IS A HARD SITUATION
WHEN COURTS
QUOTE, IT IS A HARD SITUATION
WHEN COURTS OR
QUOTE, IT IS A HARD SITUATION
WHEN COURTS OR COUNTY
QUOTE, IT IS A HARD SITUATION
WHEN COURTS OR COUNTY SOCIAL
WHEN COURTS OR COUNTY SOCIAL
WHEN COURTS OR COUNTY SOCIAL
WORKERS
WHEN COURTS OR COUNTY SOCIAL
WORKERS REMOVE
WHEN COURTS OR COUNTY SOCIAL
WORKERS REMOVE CHILDREN
WHEN COURTS OR COUNTY SOCIAL
WORKERS REMOVE CHILDREN FROM
WORKERS REMOVE CHILDREN FROM
WORKERS REMOVE CHILDREN FROM
THEIR
WORKERS REMOVE CHILDREN FROM
THEIR PARENTS
WORKERS REMOVE CHILDREN FROM
THEIR PARENTS CUSTODY.
THEIR PARENTS CUSTODY.
THEIR PARENTS CUSTODY.
THAT
THEIR PARENTS CUSTODY.
THAT IS
THEIR PARENTS CUSTODY.
THAT IS BASED
THEIR PARENTS CUSTODY.
THAT IS BASED ON
THEIR PARENTS CUSTODY.
THAT IS BASED ON THE
THEIR PARENTS CUSTODY.
THAT IS BASED ON THE INDIVIDUAL
THAT IS BASED ON THE INDIVIDUAL
THAT IS BASED ON THE INDIVIDUAL
FACTS
THAT IS BASED ON THE INDIVIDUAL
FACTS OF
THAT IS BASED ON THE INDIVIDUAL
FACTS OF THE
THAT IS BASED ON THE INDIVIDUAL
FACTS OF THE CASE
THAT IS BASED ON THE INDIVIDUAL
FACTS OF THE CASE AND
THAT IS BASED ON THE INDIVIDUAL
FACTS OF THE CASE AND THE
THAT IS BASED ON THE INDIVIDUAL
FACTS OF THE CASE AND THE NEEDS
FACTS OF THE CASE AND THE NEEDS
FACTS OF THE CASE AND THE NEEDS
OF
FACTS OF THE CASE AND THE NEEDS
OF THE
FACTS OF THE CASE AND THE NEEDS
OF THE CHILDREN.
OF THE CHILDREN.
OF THE CHILDREN.
ONCE
OF THE CHILDREN.
ONCE JUDGES,
OF THE CHILDREN.
ONCE JUDGES, SOCIAL
OF THE CHILDREN.
ONCE JUDGES, SOCIAL WORKERS
OF THE CHILDREN.
ONCE JUDGES, SOCIAL WORKERS AND
ONCE JUDGES, SOCIAL WORKERS AND
ONCE JUDGES, SOCIAL WORKERS AND
OTHER
ONCE JUDGES, SOCIAL WORKERS AND
OTHER PROFESSIONALS
ONCE JUDGES, SOCIAL WORKERS AND
OTHER PROFESSIONALS COMPLETE
ONCE JUDGES, SOCIAL WORKERS AND
OTHER PROFESSIONALS COMPLETE A
OTHER PROFESSIONALS COMPLETE A
OTHER PROFESSIONALS COMPLETE A
THOROUGH
OTHER PROFESSIONALS COMPLETE A
THOROUGH EVALUATION
OTHER PROFESSIONALS COMPLETE A
THOROUGH EVALUATION AND
THOROUGH EVALUATION AND
THOROUGH EVALUATION AND
DETERMINE
THOROUGH EVALUATION AND
DETERMINE REUNIFICATION
THOROUGH EVALUATION AND
DETERMINE REUNIFICATION IS
THOROUGH EVALUATION AND
DETERMINE REUNIFICATION IS SAFE
DETERMINE REUNIFICATION IS SAFE
DETERMINE REUNIFICATION IS SAFE
AND
DETERMINE REUNIFICATION IS SAFE
AND IN
DETERMINE REUNIFICATION IS SAFE
AND IN THE
DETERMINE REUNIFICATION IS SAFE
AND IN THE BEST
DETERMINE REUNIFICATION IS SAFE
AND IN THE BEST ENTRANCE
DETERMINE REUNIFICATION IS SAFE
AND IN THE BEST ENTRANCE --
AND IN THE BEST ENTRANCE --
AND IN THE BEST ENTRANCE --
INTEREST
AND IN THE BEST ENTRANCE --
INTEREST OF
AND IN THE BEST ENTRANCE --
INTEREST OF KIDS
AND IN THE BEST ENTRANCE --
INTEREST OF KIDS PARENTS
AND IN THE BEST ENTRANCE --
INTEREST OF KIDS PARENTS AND
INTEREST OF KIDS PARENTS AND
INTEREST OF KIDS PARENTS AND
CHILDREN
INTEREST OF KIDS PARENTS AND
CHILDREN ARE
INTEREST OF KIDS PARENTS AND
CHILDREN ARE REUNITED.
CHILDREN ARE REUNITED.
CHILDREN ARE REUNITED.
WHAT
CHILDREN ARE REUNITED.
WHAT IS
CHILDREN ARE REUNITED.
WHAT IS NEXT?
WHAT IS NEXT?
WHAT IS NEXT?
THE
WHAT IS NEXT?
THE ASSOCIATION
WHAT IS NEXT?
THE ASSOCIATION IS
WHAT IS NEXT?
THE ASSOCIATION IS TRYING
WHAT IS NEXT?
THE ASSOCIATION IS TRYING TO
THE ASSOCIATION IS TRYING TO
THE ASSOCIATION IS TRYING TO
HIRE
THE ASSOCIATION IS TRYING TO
HIRE ADDITIONAL
THE ASSOCIATION IS TRYING TO
HIRE ADDITIONAL ATTORNEYS
THE ASSOCIATION IS TRYING TO
HIRE ADDITIONAL ATTORNEYS AND
HIRE ADDITIONAL ATTORNEYS AND
HIRE ADDITIONAL ATTORNEYS AND
SO
HIRE ADDITIONAL ATTORNEYS AND
SO THEY
HIRE ADDITIONAL ATTORNEYS AND
SO THEY ARE
HIRE ADDITIONAL ATTORNEYS AND
SO THEY ARE RAISING
HIRE ADDITIONAL ATTORNEYS AND
SO THEY ARE RAISING MONEY
HIRE ADDITIONAL ATTORNEYS AND
SO THEY ARE RAISING MONEY AND
SO THEY ARE RAISING MONEY AND
SO THEY ARE RAISING MONEY AND
APPLYING
SO THEY ARE RAISING MONEY AND
APPLYING FOR
SO THEY ARE RAISING MONEY AND
APPLYING FOR GRANTS.
APPLYING FOR GRANTS.
APPLYING FOR GRANTS.
IN
APPLYING FOR GRANTS.
IN THE
APPLYING FOR GRANTS.
IN THE MEANTIME
APPLYING FOR GRANTS.
IN THE MEANTIME THE
APPLYING FOR GRANTS.
IN THE MEANTIME THE HEARING
IN THE MEANTIME THE HEARING
IN THE MEANTIME THE HEARING
RIGHT
IN THE MEANTIME THE HEARING
RIGHT HERE
IN THE MEANTIME THE HEARING
RIGHT HERE START
IN THE MEANTIME THE HEARING
RIGHT HERE START THAT
IN THE MEANTIME THE HEARING
RIGHT HERE START THAT 9:00
IN THE MEANTIME THE HEARING
RIGHT HERE START THAT 9:00 AT
RIGHT HERE START THAT 9:00 AT
