Cause of Action
The plaintiff was forced to an unwanted psychological
examine, in which the inexperienced doctor
(noting that doctors cannot be relied upon
to determine law) challenges the plaintiffs
legal theories and even case laws pertaining
to the plaintiff’s case, and denotes several
ideas or strategies the plaintiff admits to
as delusional (see Doctor Nybo Report , Case
No. 6:19-cr-00530-AA). In fact, the only evidence
for mental incompetency documented by Doctor
Nybo is really nothing more than an doctor’s
opinion on legal strategy pertaining to the
plaintiffs ongoing case.
For example, in his report, Doctor Nybo specifically
cites the plaintiff’s admitted intention
to cite case law from the OJ SIMPSON CASE;
ROE V WADE, and “CONO” – which is a
well known and very relevant case law(s) pursuant
to the CONO COMMUNICATIONS ACT.
Obviously, any examination of the allegations
against the plaintiff in a criminal complaint
against him (6:19-cr-00530-AA) would prove
beyond easily the relevancy of the CONO COMMUNICATIONS
ACT in disputing the allegations against him
in the aforementioned case.
The plaintiff also believes that he can easily
evidence that the denoted “delusional ...”references
to the O.J. Simpson Case and something he
calls CONO... he has delusional ideas that
he can add Google as his Co-Defendant...”
and the report goes on to challenge the plaintiff’s
sanity for admitting to the psychologist that
had thought about citing the ROE V WADE case
to help him in his own case (see report from
Doctor Nybo).
Obviously, Doctor Nybo is not a legal expert,
therefore he cannot say that specific case
laws or legal theories are “delusional”.
In fact, the plaintiff is believes it can
be easily examined and evidenced that, while
Doctor Nybo does truly cite the defendant
as “delusional” pertaining to his admitted
intention to use certain case law citations,
the legal strategy is actually very-very relevant
and in good legal order.
The result was that the plaintiff admitted
to several legal strategies and to his intention
to use various case law citations, and was
told he was delusional (specifically pertaining
to his legal theory):
1) the defendant was then removed to Springfield
Missouri for further examination on 07/17/2018,
not returning home for a year and two months,
in Sept. of 2019.
2) ruled incompetent to stand trial.
Because the report from Doctor Nybo specifically
references in many way s the defendant’s
legal strategy, including specific case law
citations, and marks them as “delusional”,
yet they can be proven to be very useful to
this case, the defendant in prejudiced therein,
that he does not feel safe bringing up these
specific case law citations to the court,
for fear of discrimination or further, wrongful
and illicit admittance to prison for mental
evaluation, on the pretense that his case
citations were “delusional” and warrant
a safety concern by some doctor or judge somewhere,
and he would again be locked up for more years
(referencing the report by Doctor Nybo and
the 7/17 transcripts).
Therefore, because the defendant’s legal
strategies were specifically called out by
Doctor Nybo in his report to the court, challenged
in the doctor’s psychological examination,
and referred to overly as “delusional”,
the defendant can no longer present his case
properly, because he has been wrongfully ridiculed
and even pronounced mentally ill and/or incompetent
based almost solely on his legal strategy
(see Doctor Nybo’s report).
The defendant claims that because of the Doctor’s
and the court’s malpractice, and the result
(years in prison).
