

" **The Judgment of Solomon"**

by Peter Paul Rubens

(1577-1640)

On the cover:

### "The Judgment of Solomon"

Painting by Peter Paul Rubens (1577-1640)

Statens Museum for Kunst, Copenhagen, Denmark

Fresco in Walfahrtskirche Frauenberg Catholic Church, Austria

This story is recounted in  1 Kings 3:16-28. Two young women who lived in the same house and who both had an infant son came to Solomon for a judgment. One of the women claimed that the other, after accidentally smothering her own son while sleeping, had exchanged the two children to make it appear that the living child was hers. The other woman denied this and so both women claimed to be the mother of the living son and said that the dead boy belonged to the other. The matter was brought to King Solomon for resolution.

After some deliberation, King Solomon called for a sword to be brought before him. He declared that there was only one fair solution: the live son must be split in two, each woman receiving half of the child. Upon hearing this terrible verdict, the boy's true mother cried out, "Oh Lord, give the baby to her, just don't kill him!" The liar, in her bitter jealousy, exclaimed, "It shall be neither mine nor yours—divide it!"

The king declared the first mother as the true mother, as a true, loving mother would rather surrender her baby to another than hurt him, and gave her the baby. King Solomon's judgment became known throughout all of Israel and was considered an example of profound wisdom.

After all these years, have we lost the wisdom of Solomon and split the baby?

As the world debates the undebatable, we have spilled the blood of 1.4 billion babies.

May our forgiving God have mercy on our souls.
"Split the Baby?"

Written by

Apollos Rivoire, Jr.

Copyright © 2015 by Apollos Rivoire, Jr.

All rights reserved.

Smashwords First Edition

This e-Book is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This e-Book may not be re-sold or given away to other people. If you would like to share this book with another person, please purchase an additional copy for each recipient. If you're reading this book and did not purchase it, or it was not purchased for your use only, then please return to your favorite e-Book retailer and purchase your own copy. Thank you for respecting the hard work of this author.

This book was purposely posted as an E-book so that no plants were harmed in its publication.

* * * * * * * * * *

Caution!

This publication contains logical, common sense, moral ideas and thinking.

Some readers may find the contents to be objectionable and highly disturbing.

The author cannot assume responsibility for sudden pangs of conscience or enlightment that may occur during reading.

Reader discretion is strongly advised.

Proceed at your own risk.

"Split the Baby?"

### Table of Contents

Synopsis

Forward

My Genesis

My Death

My Resurrection

My Dilemma – Evil

My Tragedy – I Wasn't Alone

The Wrath of God

A Sad Irony

The Futility of it All

The Cause

The Solution

Legal or Illegal?

Changing Hearts and Minds

The Proposal

About Murder

The Subversives

The Coward of the County

Abortion is Easy – It's the Future that's not

Atone, Forgive, Amend

Let's Pray Together

A Note from the Author

Appendix

The Tree of Life

Quotations

Pro-life Contacts

Other Reading

clipartsheep.com

SYNOPSIS

**This is a fact of which most people are not aware. More babies have been** surgically **aborted in the world in only the past 37 years than the total of all the people who were killed in all the wars for all the history of mankind on Earth.**

### 1,443,000,000 + Abortions

(One billion, four hundred, forty-three million)

January 2016

(They are still occurring at the rate of 100,000 plus more every single day, 365 days a year, yes, every day)

(Note: The number above represents surgical abortions only

an estimated additional 250,000,000 abortions were chemically induced in that period)

If you consider yourself part of the "civilized world," ponder those numbers.

Source: The abortion counter

http://www.numberofabortions.com/

(Based on the Guttmacher Institute - formed as a division of Planned Parenthood

Yes, folks that Planned Parenthood – they actually keep count of their achievements)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Our lives are so busy, so many decisions, most trivial, and some monumental. The devious in our society distract us to focus on the trivial matters, so that they can influence the monumental. The Pro-life / Pro-abortion debate is such an example.

Most have a robust, fixed opinion. But really, have we given the issue much thought? The argument is that this topic is not of importance. Evidently, it is a cogent argument, since it is not high on the list of problems facing the public. It is of importance – grave importance.

This work is an attempt to give the subject the attention and significance that it deserves. Please take the time to read it. Then, decide if the subject is trivial or monumental. Don't allow others to make the decision for you. You owe this to yourself and to the next generation, if there is one. Remember, your indecision is, in fact a decision.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Here are few words of advice and caution before the book starts, about the scale of this issue and its impact. Bear with me. Since 1973 about 50 million abortions have taken place in the USA. Surveys show that an indeterminate number of women have received multiple abortions. About 50 million abortions probably represent 40 million distinct individuals who have had abortions.

It seems highly unlikely that less than five others knew the client of the abortion and were directly or indirectly involved in some way with the torment of the event. That means that for every one abortion at least six people were involved \- the woman herself, the husband, the boy friend, the parents, the grandparents, or her best friend(s), and so on. Maybe an average of five others is conservative.

That represents a total of 240 million people (6 x 40 million). Assume half have died during the past forty-three years. That indicates that there are conservatively at least 100 million people alive today that have had some intimate contact with abortion -100 million – one third the population of the USA!

Think of all the people you see every day. Count them by three's. Every third one has been touched directly or indirectly by the tragedy of abortion – every third person. They are everywhere and everybody – the cashier at the store, the clerk, the policeman, the farmer, the bank teller, the minister, the secretary, the doctor, the teacher, your aunt, your cousin, your neighbor, possibly even your daughter (the parents may have no control over the decision in many states.) This monumental calamity has engulfed our nation.

For some, this trauma wasn't even a blip in their lives, a non-event, of no consequence - on to the next submission or conquest. For most, it was a haunting memory of the past, better forgotten. Sadly, for some it was a most deeply distressing experience opening a festering wound that never healed and unlikely to heal in the future.

The reaction may be immediate or short term, or it may be delayed and provoked by an event or events. These memories may precipitate regret, second guessing, doubt, and anguish over the life that was never to be. Most times these feelings go untreated to torment forever. Few will even seek help for fear of discovery, ignominy, or embarrassment. Even if help is sought, unfortunately, the medical professions are sorely ineffective or incompetent to deal with the recovery from this injury – lie down on the couch for an hour, tell your sad story, pay your 150 bucks; see you next week, dear. Don't trip on the sound machine on the way out, next client please.

Unfortunately, the aftermath of abortion and its devastating effect on this huge portion of the population is made invisible and completely ignored by the purveyors of abortion, the "industry of women's health." Why would they be concerned? Does a car salesman warn you of the real possibility of death and carnage on the highway while he is selling you the car? Of course he doesn't. His purpose is to sell you a car and get you out of there as quickly as possible before you change your mind. They are no different.

The abortion provider has absolutely no incentive to talk a client out of purchasing their product. It is a profit-making business like car sales. Neither purveyor cares what happens when you leave their "place of service." Apparently neither does anyone else care. You are instantly mutated from a "trusted client" to merely a line item on their balance sheet at the end of the year.

You are on your own to live with your "purchase." So many forms to sign, but none is a disclosure form warning you of the consequences of your actions. How sad. At least the car comes with a warranty, gives you a service, and when it is no longer useful, it can be sold for some financial gain. The abortion cannot be undone nor the memory discarded. Hopefully, the abortion lurks in the cobwebs of distant and ancient memories never to re-surface, but sometimes, possibly many times, it returns to the vivid memories of your yesterdays to haunt your tomorrows.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

This treatise is blunt, brutal, direct and to the point. It does not mince words. If you fear that it may revive memories better left in the past; then please, close the file, delete it, and choose another book to read. The book will not comfort you; and it certainly will not help you. It does not have the power to undo the undoable or to cure.

**Its purpose is not to torment the one third that has been personally involved in abortion, or to rekindle a circumstance that has been long forgotten and is best left in the past. That task must necessarily be left to another wordsmith or practitioner more educated, experienced, and talented than I**.

The book's purpose is to awaken to its horrors, the two thirds not having been directly affected by abortion or its contemplation. The intent being to avoid the turmoil afflicting the other one third by showing that there is no reason to place themselves into this dilemma. Its motive is to show them that the "disease" is totally preventable by a mere change in behavior and adoption of a responsible living style.

This is not brain surgery or an incurable disease that leaped out of the bushes in the night to spread its evil that takes hundreds of billions of dollars and decades of research to find a cure. The medical community does not need to assemble an army and mount a full frontal attack to solve the "problem." The "cure" is simple, cost-free, and has been in front of us all along if we only have the wisdom to open our eyes and look.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

**The avoidance of abortion and many other ills of society can be achieved with the magic silver bullet of good and responsible behavior based on moral values**.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Who would have thought such a thing? Sometimes the best solutions to solve the most difficult problems are hiding in plain sight. A bifecta – pay for none and get two free. The solutions just have to be recognized, disseminated, and put into widespread and effective use. (No, I didn't say "inseminated," naughty mind)

Just a change in behavior and all the pickets, signs, abortion clinics, advertisements, insincere and corrupt politicians, billboards, debates, arguments, harassment of clients, lobbyists, lies, deception, huge private and public expenditures, flyers, occasional murders and bombings, mutilated babies, fights over funding, and traumatized women, family and friends all just go away like a puff of smoke in the wind. Poof. This is true; don't try to delude yourself and deny it.

What a wonderful world it would be.

As Frank Sinatra sings in "Young at Heart,"

" **Now, here is the best part,"**

good behavior doesn't cost one thin dime.

"Split the Baby?"

**FORWARD**

" **CHOICE, IT'S A WOMAN'S BODY"**

" **ONLY SHE CAN CONTROL WHAT SHE DOES WITH IT!!"**

(This myopic declaration is usually shortened to the single word of "Choice" for efficiency of language and drama. The word "choice" also fits on a sign and a television screen so perfectly and makes a swell "sound bite")

"Choice," the word has a certain ring to it and a great deal of logic behind it. Every one wants choices. After all, they form the foundation of a free society. Who could be against that? Bold capitals and exclamation marks accurately define the concept since it is always shouted in defiance as an unassailable axiom – a "battle cry," "a call to arms," a "bellicose assertion," not to be challenged.

The word and the statement are not meant to invite debate, or even understanding, but rather to evoke anger and defiance, influence by power, coercion and intimidation, all concepts that are foreign to our national persona – no room for even a comment much less a discussion. Discussion, what is that? This is a settled issue presented for mass consumption, acceptance, and compliance. Any dissenting voice must be identified, mocked, humiliated, and silenced.

It is a "don't you even think about it" declaration. At least it is quite a mature and constructive approach for an assemblage that was carrying "Peace and Love" signs not so long ago. This is actually not so surprising since even within that benign message of "Peace and love" was implied, "Join the peace and love movement or we will destroy you." It is an arrogant and unfortunate attitude to comport for a matter that is arguably the greatest conflict and "morality play" of all time – abortion – the word that is conveniently omitted.

Is there similar behavior on the other side of the argument? Yes, of course. Harassment outside clinics, that's not right. A woman in crisis has enough traumas before, during, and after the abortion. But, remember the pro-life advocates do not control the power and the public presentation; they are portrayed as radicals and the embodiment of the so called "War on Women." After all, in their reverence and piety the pro-lifers do secretly conceal their hope for women to suffer and die, don't they? That's curious; at least a few pro-lifers are women, aren't they? Hmm.

Addressing "control over our bodies,"- in reality someone is telling us what to do with our bodies all of our lives and even endangering our personal welfare in many cases – men and women: our bosses, our vocation, governments through military service and even indenture, legally and illegally. You can pay off your outrageous and contrived student loan earlier if you work your butt for the government. Coercion with regard to a medical procedure of course is different, nonetheless.

Certainly, men would not want anyone to tell them what to do with their bodies with regard to a serious medical procedure. But wait, hold on. Nobody is suggesting that a woman be coerced to do anything. They are just suggesting that she not do something horrible in the name of humanity. "Don't kill your baby." What an unreasonable request that has become.

The suggestion, actually the plea, is that she, please, just completes what she started.

Hold on to that precious little baby just a while longer. Then give it to two of the dear multitudes who eagerly await to love it as if she were their own.

The act would be an entry into mature and responsible adulthood emerging from a past life that had a woeful deficiency of both. Sorry, that is so unkind, but, nevertheless a frighteningly accurate description of the circumstance.

Giving birth to the child would be a thoughtful and accountable action providing a second chance for her baby and her bringing joy to a desperate couple that was denied the privilege that she was granted but chose to obtusely discard.

Any clear thinking and unbiased person would have to admit that the truth is a woman's body is not a man's body. Actually I may be in error. In this climate of upside-down logic even that dictum may be challenged. Today, the truth is a "personal" thing. It is different for each of us. It is whatever you "feel" it to be. Why, "Playboy" magazine just announced that it will no longer use images of naked women anywhere in its publication. Is nothing sacred anymore? What is the world coming to?

But in fact, a female body is different and special, very special. It is gloriously designed and fashioned to create, grow, nurture, and care for the next generation of humans. The male body doesn't even come close. Her body is designed at the very moment of conception in her own mother's womb armed with all the millions of unique traits and characteristics that will allow her to perfectly fulfill her special role in life.

I am sure many will argue this point, but her thinking is also customized and created specifically to insure the perpetuation of that next generation. Her brain is wired to foster the nurturing of her progeny in a manner that a man could never achieve. That is why the abortion phenomenon is so contrary to the instincts of a mother and so unfathomable to contemplate.

Have we gotten so self-indulged that we have lost the ability to think clearly about our actions and their consequences? How have we gotten here? That will, most likely be the question of the ages for ethicists and historians of the future.

A lifetime of pondering this question has been met with limited success. I have not been alone in that quest. But, now, in the twilight of my life, someone has answered that question succinctly and concisely in less time that it takes to watch the evening "news."

William Lindt of the "Free Congress Foundation" has exposed the answer. In a twenty-minute presentation, he tells the frightening story how the thinking of a handful of men, yes men, starting 150 years ago got us here, if you dare inquire. The link is as follows. Technology can be used, occasionally for the advancement of the human condition, if we only have the courage to use it. It will explain how we got here.

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjaBpVzOohs>

The influence of the tongue over the mind possesses the power of life and death.

The citizens of the greatest nation to have ever existed on Earth didn't understand that.

* * * * * * * * * *

A woman does not wake up one morning surprised to find that she missed her period and is "accidentally" 2, 4, 6, or more weeks pregnant and think immediately of calling the phone number on the red sticker glued to her phone of a friendly Planned Parenthood "associate."

More accurately, there is a clear progression of conscious choices that she alone made that led up to that sobering morning. The pregnancy was anything but an accident, mistake, or unfortunate event. It was the culmination of a series of controlled, sequential, and personal actions that led to a totally predictable outcome. There was no intrigue or surprise occurrence - only the realization that she and her partner had carelessly and wantonly "screwed up," big time, as they say. (A modest pun intended)

Nevertheless, in this circumstance, no woman should be coerced to have an unwanted baby. In any case, it would seem to be an unthinkable impossibility in a free society. A majority agrees with that supposition, evidently. If we insist on condensing this monumentally complex issue into a single word that can evoke emotion and action then maybe the word should not be "choice," but rather "choices." Yes, "choices," plural.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

The choice that is proclaimed to be the choice on the signs of the abortion advocates is only the last choice in a long string of poor choices - choices that were totally made by a woman and her partner but completely within her power to control, aside from the circumstances of rape, coercion, or foul play, of course.

The other critical choices that preceded the pregnancy are intentionally and conveniently ignored. They are deemed unsuitable for public discourse by the pro-abortion advocates. Cleverly, these choices are made invisible to depict persons in this predicament as innocent victims of outside evil forces beyond their control. The other choices don't exist in their minds. They never existed.

In our world, it is never encouraged for a woman or girl to make those most important first choices correctly, any one of which if made properly could have prevented having to confront that horrible last choice – the one that we are fretting about. The one we are all debating about. The one we are all fighting about. Here are the choices that are purposely being concealed by the abortion industry and by the public at large through its indifference and apathy. The list could be accurately called "the road to hell." In fact, I will call it that.

I certainly support a woman's right to choose,

but to my mind the time to choose was before not after the fact.

Ann B. Ross, American novelist

* * * * * * * * * *

The Road to Hell

**Wisdom: the first "Choice"** The choice was made to ignore admonitions and guidance from those wiser, but rather to follow advice from dubious sources with hidden agenda instead. Quite bluntly stated, "Those who shun wisdom shall be doomed to have none."

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

**Life Style: the second "Choice"** This choice was made to pursue a questionable life style instead of a moral and civically-minded one that considers the well-being of others and the predictable negative consequences of improper actions and behaviors. Contrary to the public cry, this issue is not just about the participants. Suddenly, another being enters the drama, an innocent, voiceless, and helpless being.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

**Acquaintances: the third "Choice"** This choice was made to affiliate with unsavory cohorts instead of worthy associates displaying positive values and influence. Again, quite directly and bluntly stated, "Tell me who your friends are, and I will tell you who you are."

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

**Promiscuity: the fourth "Choice"** This choice was made to engage in promiscuous and risky activities for trivial, selfish, and questionable pursuits instead of leading a life of principles, morals, and virtue, and yes, even abstinence. Am I still allowed to use that word? Many may have to consult a dictionary for that one. It is still in the dictionary, isn't it?

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

In the history of the world, there has been only one instance of pregnancy without having intercourse. (Aside from invitro fertilization – oh, but that is another issue entirely, maybe another book.)

" **Abstinence is unassailable as a means of infallible, accessible, and inexpensive birth control." It works every time it's tried. Try it.**

It's guaranteed to work or your money back.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

**Substance Abuse: the fifth "Choice"** This choice was made to engage in substance abuse. It is no revelation that excessive alcohol consumption and drug abuse drastically lower inhibitions, decimate good judgment and decision making, destroy control, degrade behavior, and reduce awareness of one's surroundings and circumstances. The results are you are not in control, and you are reliant on the "good will" and "good judgment" of those around you when you imbibe in excessive alcohol consumption, any level of illicit drugs or abuse of prescription drugs or substances.

The best of luck is extended to you - attractive, shapely, scantily-dressed young lady in a lion's den. Blaming the victim? I don't think so. This is another glaring example of irresponsible behavior resulting in a totally predictable, tragic, and possibly deadly outcome. There is no surprise here. Participants are flirting with disaster.

**Sure, you have the right to say "no." But, why put yourself in a predicament of** not being able to say no **, or anything else, for that matter?**

The bottle for one of the most popular beers states right on the label:

"The perfect beer for removing "no" from your vocabulary for the night"

"The perfect beer for whatever happens"

#up for whatever"

"This Bud is for you." "Drink up."

There are bad guys out there who are clever, cunning, and deceptive that could not care less about your well-being. They are handsome, alluring, captivating, charming . . . and deadly. Surely, you may win a lawsuit or get justice for their actions, but, nothing will change the fact that you have been raped . . . or worse, much worse. Don't be a naive fool. Think of the life-long repercussions of your actions. Why associate with these dregs of society and place yourself in a position of extreme vulnerability? You mean nothing to them except to satisfy their cruel pursuit of lust.

Calvin Klein advertisement depicting gang rape – just boys having a little fun

Imagine, we live in a world where major merchandisers feel free to depict the gang rape of a woman to sell their wares. Buy our jeans, and you can do what you want. No one from the actors, to the publication, to the purchasers cares. We are all guilty. Bought any Calvin Klein products lately?

These consequences put even the most responsible and capable female at risk to become a victim of predatory behavior. Still again, bluntly stated, "This is a no brainer, ladies." – After a binge on alcohol and drugs it is quite literally a no brainer. You become a different person, one who is not in control and those around you, many times, encouraged the behavior and capitalized on it. You have grievously put yourself in harm's way. You have dared others to abuse you or worse. And, unfortunately, they will gladly oblige.

This Bloomingdale's ad tells us "Spike your BEST FRIEND'S eggnog when they're not looking."

Try saying "no" when you are unconscious.

Of course, none of us has ever bought anything from Bloomingdales. When you did, you paid for this ad.

Happy Holiday, enjoy the night! Well, at least one of you will.

Imagine the mentality of the Cretans developing and releasing this ad. It defies belief.

And, we turn a blind eye to the outrage. We have lost our minds.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

**Provocation: the sixth "Choice"** This choice was made to purposely dress and act in a provocative and enticing manner to attract attention and manipulate the male sex. This is playing with fire – a fire that may quickly get out of control and be impossible to extinguish – a deadly serious "game."

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

**Sexual Activity: the seventh "Choice"** This choice was made to undertake sexual activity with abandon and not employ simple, inexpensive, and readily available precautions to avoid an unwanted pregnancy in the first place. (Accepting the use of contraceptives is a serious concession for many, but if the first six choices were so poorly made, then we can only hope that this one can avoid progressing to the last deadly choice)

**Pregnancy: the eighth "Choice"** This choice is the final one and identifies the only one that the marchers display on their signs. This is the choice of which they speak. This represents the circumstance that they want everyone to believe just appeared from the sky out of nowhere – "the unwanted pregnancy." And in reality, the place these behaviors would lead was abundantly obvious from the beginning – no surprise here. The description of this "final" choice is purposely and deceptively left incomplete.

The choice is presented as "abort or don't abort." Seldom is a female made aware of the third choice to bring the baby to full term and then adoption. Even then, the field of potential parents is purposely diminished with contrived costs and government over-regulation from lobbyists whose goal is to maximize abortions.

In her crisis, the purveyors of abortion are keenly aware that she just wants this circumstance to "go away" and use that state of mind to usher her into the stirrups on her ride to hell.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

**Multiple Abortions: the ninth, tenth, and . . . "Choices"** They are no strangers to this abomination. They have been here before. They are "regulars" – "repeat customers," - "frequent flyers." As unbelievable as it may seem, for many, this process repeats multiple times like an endless ride on a wooden horsy on a merry-go-round. The real tragedy is the stirrups aren't on a painted pony, there is no music, and there is nothing merry about the ride that always ends in death, and occasionally in two deaths.

When the merry-go-round stops, the barker entices a whole new group of anxious riders to enthusiastically present their tickets and hop into the still-warm stirrups. The crowds have no difficulty finding the carousel with the flashing lights of the big red "PP" on the marquee – and no, my dear readers, the "PP" doesn't stand for "Painted Ponies."

* * * * * * * * * * *

Where a woman or girl decides to enter this deadly progression of choices varies. It could be anywhere for anyone. She could be young or middle-aged, rich-poor, lovely-ugly, black-white-brown-yellow, tall-short, married-unmarried, hitched-unhitched, kind-unkind, worthy-worthless, it really doesn't matter. All are welcome – no discrimination – no waiting. The only prerequisite to qualify for a ride is having a living, growing baby in your womb.

Either of you can be any age you want.

But, the ending is always the same and predictable – facing an unwanted pregnancy and having to make the final "choice" – to abort, not to abort, or, less likely, to adopt. One thing is for certain; riding on the carousel is not an enjoyable ride and never has a happy ending. Nobody leaves and goes home with a teddy bear, and with a smile on her face except the ride owner who leaves a trail of blood to his Ferrari with pockets stuffed with illicit dollars.

The pro-choice (pro-abortion or pro-death more correctly) groups state that a woman should have complete control over her reproductive "rights." They are completely correct. But, as you can see, she does have complete control over those rights at every stage of this deadly "game."

The conflict arises only when those rights finally collide head on with the rights of another that is helpless and has no voice or choice. What about his or her rights. Oh, I am sorry, "IT" is not a baby. "IT" has no rights. What does this generation say, "My bad?" The act of referring to a living, growing baby inside the most sacred vessel in the human body as "IT" connotes a mentality that is demonic and nauseating.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

The overriding crys and foundations of the entire abortion debate are

" **It is a woman's body, and she should control what happens to it"**

" **A woman is the master of her destiny."**

It sounds reasonable enough. Agreed!

But, remember this:

A woman's and a man's life and character

are the products of their choices

not victims of their circumstances

The key tenant here is

Assuming accountability

for their choices - if not voluntarily in this world

then by mandatory consequence in the next

It is something to think about.

Don't believe it?

Is it worth the risk?

What if you are both mistaken?

Men, don't get too smug, leaning back in your chair with your hands clasped behind your head puffing on your fragrant Montechristo, and believe that you are without culpability. You don't get to escape free of blame. Oh, I forgot, the cigar is for a birth, not an abortion – eh, in the scheme of things today, some don't make the distinction, do they?

In this sad tale, the woman has control at every stage. (of course, except for rape, and we know you gentlemen wouldn't do that, don't we?) You are just as guilty in this tragedy. None of it could have happened without your "contribution," most times, your encouragement or even enticement. Wipe the vacuous, "Who, me," look off your faces. In the vernacular, "You know what I'm sayin'?"

Oh, and going back once again to the ladies for a moment, don't start something you don't intend to finish, - revelation, my dears: a lot of guys weren't born with an on/off switch – just an "on" switch. They were absent when the "off" switches were being installed. Remember that. Don't touch his "switch, – "You know what I'm sayin'?" Wink, wink.

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

This short book attempts to give these tiny, innocent souls a voice, a chance to have the gift of life that was so graciously given to everyone and that was so selfishly denied to them. Everyone reading this book got his chance, so don't deny them theirs. You shouldn't play God and decide who gets a chance and who doesn't. It isn't your decision to make, "women's health advocates." Once you have started the life process in motion it really isn't your choice to end it.

Pregnancy and parenthood is not some wonderful cross county trip you and your beloved partner decided embark on from New York to Los Angeles and then partly there on a whim you suddenly decided to cancel the trip and fly home from Denver. Doing so requires that you leave a human being behind at the airport to die in the trash. It might be a bit cruel? It's a nasty business, this abortion business no matter what analogy is used.

" **I've noticed that every one who is for abortion has already been born."**

Ronald Regan in the 1980 Presidential debate.

The next pages are an attempt to influence the behavior in our society so that the helpless have a voice and potential mothers don't have to be confronted with that awful eighth choice or beyond. The ultimate goals are to unmask and derail the ugly abortion industry and let it die a death they have been horribly giving to tens of millions, hundreds of millions, globally. Make abortion rare.

This entire "Forward" can be summarized with two words:

" **Responsible behavior"**

Engage in responsible behavior and abortion and the need for this book go away.

I challenge you.

Go ahead, "Make my day."

Put me out of business.

I will be out of your hair.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

What a wonderful world it would be . . .

If we only had the vision to see

If we could just let it be

If everything was not just about me

If there were more of we than me

If we could all engage in repartee

If every request was responded with, "Mais oui"

If calls for help were returned with, "Oh, si, si"

If impossibility was confronted with yes, siree!

What a wonderful world it would be . . .

If each appeal didn't have to be a plea

If each transgression were met forgivingly

If he honored she, and she honored he

If we modeled our life after He instead of we

If He became more important than we

If we all spent a moment humbly on one knee

If sanity could replace "PP"

Oh, what a wonderful world it could be.

Apollos Rivoire, Jr

babygirlnames.com

To get a better concept of the prelude to my "mother's" experience in making her "choice," go to the following site for a short video of the consultation process.

It will be enlightening and educational:

 https://www.facebook.com/liveaction/videos/vb.49651563727/10152667724028728/?type=2&theater

But, please come back.

There's more, much more.

### "Split the Baby?"

Apollos Rivoire, Jr

MY GENESIS

This is the moment of my first awareness.

It is the first realization that I am a conscious being.

It is a strange but wonderful feeling.

No matter how hard I try, I have no memory of anything prior.

I don't even know who I am.

I don't know my name.

Where am I?

What I am doing here?

Even the moniker "I" seems most strange.

* * * * * * * * *

I think I am alone, but strangely I am not sure. There seems to be another presence. But, I cannot see anyone else. It's a little frightening, but I cannot see anything. Not even myself. I cannot open my eyes. It is as if someone sewed my eyelids shut. I don't know if it is dark or light, everything is black. I conclude I am quite blind. But I do not fear my blindness nor the darkness for I have known nothing else.

My mind is racing. There are so many thoughts, so many questions, but no answers. There is no one to ask.

There appear to be no past, no future, there is only the present. I am not entirely sure I know what those words mean.

I don't know where I am. Being unable to see, there are so few clues. Even though I don't know where I am, I seem to belong. Peculiarly, I am a part of where I am. That seems to be an extraordinary phenomenon. How can I be a part of where I am? It doesn't appear to make any sense.

But, how is it that this feeling is extraordinary and unusual since I have no memories of what is normal with which to compare it? My mind is confused, but "good" confused. That doesn't even make sense either. But, then again, neither does anything else.

Searching for the answers is apparently challenging rather than baffling. Finding answers is an illusive but pleasant adventure. I consider myself to be a sponge for knowledge, whatever knowledge is – but, more about that later. I seem to be slowly nodding off into the fog from which I came. My only concern is, "Will I be able to return?" . . .

* * * * * * * * *

My consciousness has restored itself, and I feel unusually rested, but I am a bit lonely. I think I am completely naked. I cannot feel the presence of any clothes. "What could have happened to my clothes?" "Who took them?" "What are clothes anyway?" I entertain it as an academic question, but, it is not frightening. I feel comfortable in my nakedness. It seems to be the appropriate "attire." It seems "right" for my circumstance.

I am not too hot and not too cold. But, I don't know from where the comfort is coming. I don't feel any activity providing for my well-being. There is no movement, just the comfort. There is no warmth from above or coolness from below just a feeling of well-being.

Unlike my blindness, I think I can hear. Once in a while there are some unusual gurgling sounds or moving water all around and a steady muffled low frequency beat – one steady beat, not many, just one. It is not annoying. Actually, it is somewhat reassuring, and comforting. The ever-present sound of the beat is probably the major thing that suggests that I am not alone – that there is more.

The sound does not seem to have an origin or a direction. It is above. It is below. It is to the left and to the right. It is nowhere. It is somewhere. It is everywhere. Maybe it is only emanating from my mind or my imagination. But then again, I can feel it vibrate and soothe my body – more thinking to come. But, for now that strange feeling of semi-consciousness is returning and overpowering me . . .

* * * * * * * * *

I am again aware. I return to the task of more thinking. Time doesn't seem to exist, yet I feel it is passing. I am not sure how I know that. There is nothing to indicate time. I am not certain I even know what time is. There is a distinct awareness that there are cycles of activity and inactivity. I think I know "time" is passing because of these regular cycles of consciousness and unconsciousness. My conclusion is that time must be passing.

The space in which I reside and defines my world seems to be moving. I have the distinct impression that I am traveling. Sometimes the path is smooth and sometime rough. At times it seems to have a relaxing pace, other times a rapid one. Curiously, I don't feel any kind of discomfort from the movement. There are some bumps – some big ones. Maybe I am being held here by some unknown force or entity.

But, I do seem to be somewhat confined in a small place. I can feel the walls around me. It seems there are no breaks in these walls, no openings at all. Yet, even so, I don't feel trapped. The walls are soft and pliable as if they have been padded for my comfort and protection by some unknown, but kind and benevolent being.

I am not tied or restrained. I feel I am suspended, floating. I can move. I don't think I am a prisoner. But, even so, maybe I am sympathizing with my captor and even if I could leave I wouldn't. I don't feel that way. I believe I want to stay where I am of my own free will.

Given the choice to leave or to stay, I would certainly stay. Why would I not. Besides if I am being held against my will, where is my incarcerator?

It appears to be such a long time since I ate or drank anything. There are no means to feed me. No food or drink of any type is present or appears. Yet, I don't really feel hunger or for that matter even thirst – no, not even thirst. This is quite curious. This is something worth pondering further.

I have concluded that time is in fact passing – a lot of time. There is nothing to do, but then, I don't feel like doing anything. "What would I do anyway?" Frankly, there is nothing to do - nothing to occupy my time. "But, why don't I feel bored?" Rather than boredom, I feel a strange sense of anticipation, something to come, possibly, something incredible and wonderful.

But, this is most curious. The feeling of something to come is materializing from the mist of my thoughts. For the first time I seem to have awareness of, not just the present, but rather of something called the future. It is just forming in my mind, and it is still not clear, but it seems to be an indication of what will happen **later** rather than now, whatever later is.

It appears this thing to come will be something remarkable, something new, not nothingness but rather something exciting, useful and meaningful – something valuable, something in which I will be involved. It is a feeling that there are others that I will help and who will return that help – a mutually rewarding experience.

I believe it may be what is called a community – how exciting. This is still another inexplicable inconsistency that I must place on my research list – again more thinking. Oh, that state of limbo seems to be approaching again. I will not resist . . .

* * * * * * * * *

**MY DEATH**

Viewer discretion advised.

Actual photo of a disorganized and undifferentiated tissue mass

invading an unsuspecting woman's body

I am refreshed from my rest and of the revelations that have entered my mind. I am excited about what is to come. For the moment, I am quite comfortable. It appears, however, that the comfort is going to be short-lived. It is being interrupted. Just when I am beginning to think everything is going to remain pleasant, strange things are starting to happen – very strange things that never happened before. This is not a good development in my opinion, not a good development at all.

I am very pleased with my station; I want my environment to stay stable so I can contemplate the adventure that I anticipated to take place. However, not just one thing is changing, but many things, too many things, everything. This is no time for more thinking about my adventure. I must plan some action. This appears to be serious. I remain in an agitated and alert state – no welcomed nodding off this time . . .

* * * * * * * * *

The excitement of lofty thoughts of being useful and of accomplishment has changed to fear and apprehension. Fear of something different. Fear of the unknown. What had been only wonderful thoughts of the present are now starting to become terrible thoughts of what is to come – an uncertain and frightening future. "What is happening and why is it happening?" I don't like what appears to be approaching. The present state of affairs is just fine. "Why can't everything just stay the way it is?" The apprehension is everywhere, and I fight off the state of relaxation once again . . .

* * * * * * * * *

My initial experience of fatigue from the lack of rest is not a pleasant one. For the first time, I feel strangely unsafe and fearful. "I feel what?" It is a strange and foreign object poking at my shoulder as if it is beckoning to get my attention. It certainly has succeeded if that is its purpose. "But, what is it and what does it want?" I cannot see it. It makes no sound, it only continues to poke and probe unrelentingly as if with some specific and malevolent purpose that it does not wish to reveal. Its goal remains a secret known only to itself.

It is something that is not of my world, something that is not in my experience. Somehow my senses tell me it is sinister and not kind or friendly. It again touches my shoulder. It rests there as if to contemplate its next move. It is, oh, so cold and lifeless. I feel one of the walls of my enclosure poke in as if being pushed from the other side, a probe of some sort. The bulge appears to roam in one direction and then the other as if it were searching for where I am. I cannot move. There is nowhere to hide although I feel I should. It hesitates and moves no more as if it has found me. All movement strangely stops for a moment. It is unusually calm. Nothing is happening. It is a welcome development. Maybe the event is over. I feel relaxation come over me. The danger seems to be gone.

I am not sure how long this calm lasted, but it is truly welcomed. I pray that possibly this is the end of this most unusual and frightening event. Every part of my body is relieved with the prospect of normalcy. My feeling of apprehension appears to have been premature and unwarranted. My state of agitation was for naught. All is good.

* * * * * * * * *

Then suddenly, without warning, the metal intruder separates into two parts, bites down on to me with its sharp teeth and crushes my shoulder. It twists and turns my arm, and twists and turns again until it viciously claims ownership. It makes a quick departure. I fear it has taken my arm with it. It was my arm. It had no right to take it. "What could it possibly want with my arm?" "It doesn't even work without being attached to me."

Every emotion, every nerve ending cries a silent scream for that is all of which I am capable.

If I could scream I would. But, I cannot. All I can do is writhe in agony. I have not the means to do otherwise.

As much as I kick with my legs and push back with my remaining arm, I cannot reverse the pain. It is beyond my strength to stop it. I have no idea how to stop it. I had not known this feeling until now. "It is horrible." "Is this how it will end?" "Is this the climax of my aspirations and my hopes?" "It can't end like this, can it?" "Why did I come into being only to be ripped apart by a metal serpent?" It seems to be a terrible waste to be conceived only to be killed – it seems inhumane – it is inhumane.

"Am I going to suffer a cruel and painful end?" There seems to be no one around to help or anyone who cares to help. "Is it possible that no one cares about what is happening to me – apparently not?" I have finally convinced myself that I am completely on my own. Whatever evil lurks here, it seems to be undaunted and working with authority and impunity. It has no opposition, and I am powerless to oppose it.

I cannot speak for myself.

" **Is there no one who can speak for me?"**

" **Is there no one who** will **speak for me?"**

I am hurting no one. I have done nothing wrong to deserve this.

" **What purpose could torturing me possibly serve?"**

" **No one could be that cruel – could they?"**

" **Is this some sick perversion?"**

* * * * * * * * * *

I am so concerned with the prospect of being crushed to death, I am only slightly aware of other bizarre and equally ominous changes. The beat is becoming louder, more distinct, and the tempo is increasing although there is still only one.

The sound that was so calming and reassuring only a short time ago now becomes ominous and threatening – possibly the beat of an invading army of more metal serpents. I can hear what seem to be muffled indistinct and different sounds in the distance combining with the beat. These are certainly not good omens.

The muffled sounds seem to be from several sources – there do seem to be others, it is not my imagination. They are not soft and sedate, peaceful sounds, bringing good news. They seem loud, excited, and even frantic at times. They certainly are not friendly sounds from others I would want to meet or are coming to assist me.

I never even realized that there could be others to meet. "Why are they not coming to my aid?" I am truly becoming anxious and fearful of what awaits me – no more thinking, just more apprehension. "Oh, my shoulder is just throbbing with unspeakable pain." "This is an experience with which I would rather be unacquainted."

* * * * * * * * *

Rest and comfort have become fleeting memories. Nothing prepared me for this catastrophe. This is it. There is no doubt; something is out there with evil intent. This was no accident or random happening. It does not seem that it will be a quick and painless end for me. It is natural to wonder what one's demise will be. But, when the end is indeed upon you, the wonderment somehow seems to lose its novelty. Unfortunately, the mystery surrounding my finale is soon to be satisfied.

It appears that the serpent's appetite has not been satisfied. It has returned apparently for more – of me. It now pokes at my other shoulder. Its intent seems indisputable now. There is no hesitation this time – only determination. It once again proclaims its power, displays its teeth, and takes my other arm with alarming dispatch.

There is a sharp rise of unbearable pain which quickly disappears as it melds with the horrible pain I already feel. It becomes apparent that the serpent wants all of me, but prefers to take me a piece at a time to maximize my agony.

I struggle, but to no avail. Resistance is futile. The ability to resist is now completely gone with the loss of both my arms. The insatiable serpent departs and quickly returns a third time to take one leg and with horrible speed and efficiency it returns for the other. Its purpose is now clear. It wants me, not part of me, all of me but one piece at a time. I have little more to give. "Why would it want me, anyway?"

The layers of pain almost don't matter any more. They just combine. They are each indiscernible but combined they are unbearable. Together they are one massive agony and torment. They invade every cell. I am starting to become light-headed. I hope I will lose consciousness before this horrible deed ends.

But, regrettably I still remain awake. I am okay with passing out. I am thinking, "Please make it quick." "I just don't want to suffer any longer." "What did I do that has been so atrocious to deserve this suffering?" There is not one thing that comes to mind.

As the walls close in, I can feel what is left of my body being stretched like I am being pulled apart. The serpent comes back for one last bite, grabs me by one hip and starts pulling me. It is a jerking pull, harsh and violent, squeezing me through a tunnel – pull, stop, pull, and stop.

I can feel myself moving with each pull as my chest is being crushed. Oh, this is unthinkable. "Why does someone want to torture me?" I thought, "Just kill me, and be done with it." My wish will soon come true.

* * * * * * * * *

My unending suffering continues. There is no way out of this. It goes on forever. Whoever hates me, wants to prolong my suffering for as long as possible. Crush me, stretch me, release me, crush me again and again – and my silent screams coinciding with the crushing. I know I cannot take much more of this misery.

Now, it happens – a final crushing to end it all. This is not like any of the others. But, wait, it is not ending here. Something is crushing my shoulders and pulling my head off. Am I being beheaded? My neck is beginning to stretch. This is more terrible than I could have imagined. At least the end has to be near. There is one final painful pull.

* * * * * * * * *

Something major has happened - nothing good. For the first time I can see some light, some faint images. I appear to be somewhere else. It is a forbidding, frigid, and harsh place. There are no soft walls to caress me – no warmth to comfort me – no quiet to soothe me, no feeling of well-being. The beat is gone.

With no arms and legs and oozing from every joint, I have been unceremoniously deposited on a table like a baby lamb that has been butchered, but still twitching and "alive."

I find myself on my back, unable to move, on a cold metal plate with raised edges leaving me in a pool of my own fluids. My tormentors are evidently quite tidy. I wouldn't want to drip on them. Blood stains are so hard to remove.

I can sense the serpent on the plate lurking motionless next to me covered in my blood and flakes of my skin as if poised to take one last bite to complete his repast. But, for now it appears to be between meals having satisfied his appetite. Feeding time is over. This despicable creature has done its work well and is contented, for now.

Several giants are standing over me. It appears they are communicating with each other. They are cordially conversing. They seem pleased with themselves as if they have accomplished something of substantial import. From their amiable tone, they seem to enjoy their work. I am glad for them that they are pleased. I only wish that I would be able to say the same.

A portrait of the author

I know everyone will debate how old I am and whether I can feel pain, and whether I have brain waves. "Experts" will make wildly divergent claims. They will analyze the photo for authenticity, race, photo shop, alterations, and nationality – two-weeks, six-weeks, ten-weeks, first trimester, or third trimester, the size of a pea or a full grown baby, five ounces, or five pounds. None of that matters. From conception, I was endowed with a unique code of a human being like no other and had a strong probability of surviving.

But, now the only certainty is my life is almost over. The loss of my life cannot be reversed and the memory cannot be erased for all time from the minds of the perpetrators or from the mind of God. I pray that the torment of the woman who would have been my mother will lessen with time and she will not suffer.

I am sure she felt trapped and that she had no other choice. I don't know her name, and I never had one to know. I suffer with her for the years of love that we could have had together that will never be.

Certainly, I would have loved her.

If I only had a chance to know her.

I just wish she had loved me.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Well, it has been most kind of you to read about me. Thank you. I have been dying for you to see what I look like. Certainly, "A picture is worth a thousand words." You know how written descriptions alone are so inadequate and have a tendency to be so impersonal.

I thought I would include my family school portrait for you to get to know me better. That's right, I forgot, I don't have a family and I didn't go to school and never will. The photo came from somewhere – how thoughtful. At least someone was considerate enough to take my picture – sorry, not much of a smile, and I did so much want to clean up to look my best before they took the picture – an opportunity lost.

Nevertheless, you should get to know me better. Actually, there isn't much to learn about me since I didn't get to accomplish much of anything during my short stay, did I. At least you finally got to know what I look like. Maybe, you can save my picture on your smart phone, so you don't forget me. I hope so much that you don't forget me.

Show me to your friends, you know, when you show them pictures of your own children. It can be sort of like adopting me. That would be nice to have a family, even an adopted one. Finally, I am so sorry I forgot to give notice that my picture might just offend someone. I am not very attractive. I am not exactly the baby of the month you know.

"Do you know what I am thinking?" If my photo offends some, then they should get off their collective butts and do something about it – don't you think?

* * * * * * * * * * *

It's not over. After some more conversation, one of the lady giants takes a scissors, hesitates and hands them to the other giant. I guess it is not her turn today. (She probably was a mother) The second giant opens the scissors, spreads my lips open with her other hand, inserts the scissors in my mouth and begins to cut her way through my nose to my forehead. Snip, snip, snip. Blood gushes down my throat and I gasp for air. The gasp turns out to be a worthless endeavor since I am aspirating my own blood.

I think this is th . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Gurgling, blackness, then silence, only deadly silence . . .

**MY RESURRECTION**

Author's note:

I originally called this chapter "My Rebirth."

Then, I had an epiphany. I was never born in the first place!

Silly, silly me

Forgive me. You know of course, I am an extremely young and inexperienced author.

I might just qualify to be one of the youngest, most inexperienced authors in history.

Some time has passed. I am not sure how much. Once again, I am somewhere else. I have no idea how I got here, and I have no recollection of the journey. What a relief, the pain has finally stopped. There is light everywhere. I am no longer trapped in my body, at least what was left of it. Thank the Lord. Anyway, "That body didn't do me much good, did it?" I suppose someone else had a greater need for it than I.

I don't believe I am a physical being any longer. I seem to be a floating spirit in this place. I hear the unhurried, regular resonance of a solitary bell. "Could it be that the bell is announcing my arrival?" If that is so, what a warm and comforting sensation it is to be wanted and transformed from being considered worthless to being kindly welcomed and valuable. I am suddenly conscious that I am not alone. The euphoria of my arrival is somewhat diminished as, I become aware of a chorus of little ones like me sobbing in sorrow. They are apparently grieving for my terrible experience, for compassion for my "mother," and for the salvation of the giants and their cohorts who did this to me.

I am looking down from above, and I now see and understand everything below. I am aware of everything that has gone before. I am now my soul, my spirit, my essence, free of earthly suffering and pain. I now know my aspirations of what I could have accomplished. I had ahead of me a full life of good works and deeds to help others.

" **I could have been somebody"**

I would have had the ability to produce offspring and they theirs as far into the future as I could see. I was denied that opportunity as were all those generations. What a waste of humanity my short time on Earth was - to have been conceived, lived, and died before I had a chance to be brought into the world. All of that was ordained by those who, unlike me, had been given that priceless gift – the gift of life, the gift of being born.

geneluptak.com
**MY DILEMMA, EVIL**

I said I could see and understand everything. That is not entirely true. There is still one thing about which I still have considerable confusion.

My dilemma is this. I begin to realize that every generation of humans on the Earth has had the misfortune of having evil people among them. It seems that this has been the norm rather than an aberration. This is a certainty, indisputable, and apparently unchangeable. Additionally, the most evil and ruthless seek and gain the most influence for their own advancement while leaving a wake of death, destruction, and heartache for the masses of humanity.

Go to the following site for the truly frightening scope of that evil. But, as you peruse the list, remember that the scale of what happened to me and my brothers and sisters preceding me and following me eclipses those numbers by a wide margin with no less inhumanity. The most frightening part is there are others who are not on the list walking among you this very moment. Some are quite obviously deranged, but most disconcerting are those among you that wear the disguise of benevolence over their core of evil.

Caution: It is no longer an easy task to tell the good from the evil.

<https://25mostevil.wordpress.com/>

This accumulation of power, worldly possessions and depravity of those with evil intent always far exceeds their ability to benefit from them during their short time on Earth. They come to believe that they are immortal. I now come to the part I do not understand.

This is my quandary. "Why do seemingly good people, not only allow this evil to rise and flourish, but then actually assist it and participate in it?" Without that complicity the evil could not prevail. Perhaps a quote from Ann Barnhardt can help you understand, help me understand, help us all understand:

Evil is never satisfied with mere toleration.

It progresses to ratification, then celebration, then co-participation.

Finally, it ends with the inevitable destruction of the souls of the

originators and the enablers.

Paraphrased from Ann Elizabeth Andrew Barnhardt – 2014

<http://www.barnhardt.biz/>

* * * * * * * * * * *

There is so much pontificating about us precious children and how much we are loved and protected.

Yet, despite the declarations of concern for us, the most vulnerable, the future of the human race, everywhere and for all time, we have been the most neglected, maligned, and disposable part of humanity outside the womb, and yes now inside the womb.

The most dangerous place for us has become inside our mother's body.

We have not been, nor are we now, revered or valued

despite public declarations to the contrary.

We have no human value, just monetary value and a scarce measure of that. We have been bought, sold and traded, mutilated, abandoned, ignored, abused, tormented, tortured, starved, exposed to disease, worked unrelentingly, used as slaves and sexual objects, and neglected for the frivolities, desires, and distractions of our "parents" and society. I see that this is not new. Apparently, it has gone on for millennia. Of course, there are good, loving parents, but they don't seem to be in the majority. Certainly mine were not among their sparse ranks. I don't know what I did to them for them to hate me so much and carry out what they perpetrated against me – another thing I have yet to understand, possibly never understand.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

But, it seems one thing is different now from the past – oh, so much different if that seems possible.

For the first time in history, it appears that mankind is no longer willing to wait for us to be "born" to abuse and murder us.

Now, we are relentlessly pursued and destroyed by the hundreds of millions from the moment of our conception with the willing complicity of governments, societies, legal systems, and so-called compassionate individuals, members of "civilized humanity" and, yes, even by our parents, especially our parents. We are not even safe any longer in the protective cocoon of our mothers' wombs, formerly the bastion of life.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

What happened to me is the ultimate outrage. When I was being dismembered in the womb of my "mother," I thought I was alone in my torment. Now I am aware that in the almost four decades before my "arrival," almost one and a half billion of my brothers and sisters on Earth have met a fate similar to mine. And, yet those who argue for this practice to continue have the arrogance to imply that most women have little access to this procedure.

" **How can this procedure be available to so few and yet so many babies have been killed?"**

This is a massive incongruity

a lie among many, if you prefer.

I was just being civil calling it an incongruity.

fcasa.wordpress.com

What kind of sorry species have you become to choose your own selfish needs

over the lives of your living offspring?

And just what are those essential needs?

**I** must pursue **my** dreams. **I** just must.

**I** am too young to be held down by having a baby.

**I** am too old to have to take care of a baby.

**I** have to pursue **my** education.

**I** want to travel and experience the world.

**I** must have **my** new car. **I** waited so long.

**I** am not ready right now. Later.

**My** boyfriend will be angry and leave **me**.

**My** career for which **I** worked so hard will be over.

**My** aspirations for **my** dream home will end.

**My** "friends" will abandon **me.**

**My** scholarship will be withdrawn.

**My** chances for stardom will be gone.

**My** freedom will be over.

**My** husband will leave **me.**

**My** perfect body will never be the same.

**My** achievements in sports will never recover.

**My** finances will be destroyed.

**My** lifestyle will be ruined.

**I** will miss my opportunity to study abroad.

**I** can't contend with a special needs child.

**I** would rather have a boy (girl).

**I** can't emotionally deal with any child.

**I** will need to move in with **my** parents.

**I** will have to relinquish the best years of **my** life.

All of these "inconveniences" will magically go away, and I can move on.

If I just kill my baby – that's all I need to do.

I can have another when I am ready. My problem is solved.

### I – MY – ME

Poor, poor baby! - Not you! - The baby!
**MY TRAGEDY – I WASN'T ALONE**

My fate has not been unique – oh, so far from it. I know this for certain because they who suffered like I are all around me as I speak and try with great difficulty and sorrow to convey my terrible story. It is not a story of a part of my life. It is a story of the entirety of my life. I have known nothing else but torture and pain. Somewhere I heard that folks consider holding someone's head under water for a minute as torture. They should be exposed to my ordeal.

**More babies have been aborted in the world in only the past forty years than the total of all those who have been killed in all the wars for all the history of mankind on Earth – 1.4 billion.** **Think about that. This tragedy is of biblical proportions. Do your own research, if you dare. Don't be squeamish. This is how your generation will be remembered. If that doesn't move you, then may God help you? Just stop reading my story, erase this file, put your computer on standby, and go outside and do something really important like washing your car.**

I know, this is just too horrible to read about.

Try living it.

We up here are of every type imaginable. We are complete beings with genetic codes describing every characteristic unique only to us and no one else. We were helpless, voiceless, souls crying out for compassion and none was offered and none was given. And yet, in the few short hours of recounting this story, thousands more have arrived. They are in front of me, behind me, to each side, above and below me. "We," our spirits are everywhere. Oh, the inhumanity of mankind. "Is it a mystery that the angels sob?"

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Now I understand that my body was far too "valuable" to be discarded. I was dismembered and sold for "parts," you know like parts purchased at a junk yard for cars. The only difference is that the cars died a "natural" death after a full and useful "life." I wasn't granted the same courtesy as these inanimate, mechanical monsters that are routinely worshiped and meticulously cared for even after their "deaths."

No one mourned me or my brothers and sisters. No one will mourn us. We are faceless, nameless, and invisible. No one will find a record or mention of us anywhere.

Yet, we will not be forgotten, for we never "existed."

I have been here only a very short time in this wonderful place of peace, but I am increasingly finding that God is reaching the limits of His enormous grace and forgiveness. I am told that God, in all His perceived forms imagined by mankind, is all forgiving. But, my understanding is that His forgiveness is not granted without the remorse and atonement of the sinner. Those sentiments do not seem to exist in your hearts. Most rationalize that they have not committed a transgression and therefore never ask forgiveness nor will they receive it. How sad that is.

Most disturbingly, is it appears that up here the definition of "sinner" is accepted as all those who participate in any way in the sin **and** all those who passively condone the sin by indifference and neglect. This is not widely understood "down there." This will be a rude awaking and a most unfortunate surprise for most of those we left behind. It appears that I may have been among the luckiest to have been on Earth for my short stay.

Over and over, I keep hearing up here, "The only thing that evil needs to flourish is that good men do nothing." Certainly this is evil, most assuredly it is flourishing, and absolutely most good men are doing nothing. I speak from personal experience. Nothing was done by the "good" to save me. Edmond Burke and Charles Aked told you this, centuries ago but woefully few of you were listening.

" **The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."**

Edmond Burke (1727-1797) Irish Statesman / Charles Aked (1893)

I have learned that never before in the history of man on Earth has genocide of innocents taken place on this scale. I pray for the souls of those among the seven billion souls roaming their way through life that are the participants and placid, unconcerned observers of these evil deeds. My God, your God, our God, will not forgive this.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Here is one further word about the ordeal we endured. Surely, what was done to us was reprehensible. But, it was a further insult to tell us that we are not "alive" or "human beings" yet. The echoes of rationalization can condone anything, can they not? They who justify their complicity sleep soundly and well, very well – for now, for it may be a short-lived peace never to return.

Just remember when judgment time comes – you all were warned by the Lord.

Don't believe it is a baby?

Here are only some of the references to a baby in the womb by God:

"Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born,

I consecrated you; I have appointed you a prophet to the nations."

Jeremiah 1:5

On abortion, God says "Thou shalt not kill."

The Sixth Commandment

" **You knit me in my mother's womb."**

Psalm 139

" **From my mother's womb you are my God."**

Psalm 22

In the womb God "set me apart and called me through His grace."

Paul to the Galatians

Children (are a) "gift from the Lord" - "the fruit of the womb is a reward."

Psalm 127

Do these declarations imply in any way that we babies in the womb are not alive or are not complete human beings. Oh, so many of us have not been given the chance of being a prophet of anything.

* * * * * * * * * *

Since the beginning of time, one of the most fundamental precepts guiding almost every living species on Earth has been for mothers to protect their offspring at every level of their development, and yes, even their fathers were and are their guardians and defenders.

Even the most primary instinct of self-preservation gets trumped by the instinct of living things to protect their young and yes, that extends to their unborn.

Insects will fight to the death to protect their eggs from danger. This axiom is true of almost every other living species that is known. Are their examples of living things not protecting their young or even killing or eating them? Of course there are.

But, it is not the rule, and the laws of nature and survival explain almost every example of the destruction of their young based on the propagation of their species. But, these are not thinking, moral, and compassionate beings like you claim to be. Could it be that the "savages" care more about their offspring than you who claim to be their masters?

And yet, you, the most "advanced" form of life known, self-declared protectors of the environment, the masters of your planet and the creatures that roam above it, on it, and under it, and overlords of the universe, must contemplate in endless debate to justify the unjustifiable as this horror freely takes place all around the globe with your tacit approval and indifference. Has your advanced intellect blinded you to the most basic instincts of life? Have you not even the "morals" and instincts of the lowest beasts of the land or the seas over which you claim to have dominion?

You answer that. I have no explaination.

despedidadesolteracr.com

A concerned and protective mother and her child

She is not posing for the camera.

Just the presence of the camera man

puts the mother on high alert to protect her child-

on her haunches, focused, eyes pealed, ears erect, poised for battle against any danger.

Mother – protection – child - what are they?

You can learn so much from the kangaroos.

How utterly twenty-first-century you are.

Do you have to learn this basic principle from the beasts of the wild and then be reminded of it by a dead baby such as I?

These are not just cute pictures of mothers and their offspring to cleverly tug at your heartstrings and influence. They are true representation of how every mammal in nature relates to its young instinctively protecting them to propagate the species. This is the way it is in nature everywhere you look. It is the norm, except for you "modern humans."

Are you the only group of living entities that doesn't understand that? Even the wildest, most brutal of the animals show true caring and concern for their young. If two words could describe their relationships and behavior it would be "contentment" and "diligence" in their role as guardians and protectors.

Oh, you say they don't know that there is a living entity inside them when they are pregnant? You don't really believe that, do you? We call them wild animals and beasts, and we call ourselves higher beings. Maybe we should consider, "Did we get that backward?"

Thousands of activists go crazy when the seal and whale hunts occur and the events are intensely covered by the media. Millions of babies slaughtered each year barely instigate a collective national yawn. The Washington Pro-life march hardly gets a mention in the media. When it is mentioned, its magnitude and importance is grossly understated or challenged.

When the pro-abortion marches occur they are extensively covered before, during, and after with great intensity and many times great exaggeration. Vocal, crass, and vulgar "celebrities gather their flocks and demean, threaten, and harass, those who remain silent or present any opposition. Contrary views are not welcomed, tolerated, and forcibly silenced. Each year the opposition to contrary viewpoints become more angry, aggressively vulgar and threatening.

**THE** **WRATH OF GOD**

Over half of you have been convinced that it is all right to kill your progeny. You play with, obfuscate, and distort language. You manipulate meanings by creating your own perverted lexicons. You nuance. You rationalize. You equivocate. You lie to yourselves, your consciences, and others.

**You refuse to grasp what almost every other living thing understands instinctively: to protect her young and unborn at the cost of her own well-being or even her life.** **You not only don't understand that, but you go even further in your depravity and destroy that innocent life for your own frivolities.**

You look to others, and they look to you to justify your lascivious behavior. "If you are all doing it, then it must be okay, right?" You see, you are special. You are so special. You have the "wisdom" to make your own rules and laws above those of your God.

Most who are reading this who support unlimited and unregulated abortion will attempt to discredit it by insisting that the entire book is irrelevant since the premise on which it is based is false. They claim that what is in the mother's womb is not a baby. It is an embryo, a fetus, a mass of growing cells. It is not a human being. And, so rages the debate.

Watch this video and decide that this is not a baby.

 http://www.msn.com/en-us/video/other/pregnant-belly-shows-dancing-baby-inside/vi-BBqkWy9

What a humiliation and an insult to God that you folly in your arrogance and wallow in your ignorance. You delude yourselves into believing that what is in a mother's womb is not a living, growing human being in order to satisfy your conscience and rationalize your behavior to eliminate it.

What if you used the same rational for another approach to the unwanted pregnancy? If you pretend you are not pregnant, then you avoid the consequences, well at least for nine months. Wishing you were not pregnant does not change the reality that a child will be born. Claiming it is not a baby does not change the reality either. If it is not a baby then why abort it? Abort: To terminate, stop, discontinue, interrupt, nullify or prematurely end the growth of a baby.

You delude yourselves into believing He does not see.

How pitiful is that?

↑

The Last Judgment, The Sistine Chapel

Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni

(check out the chap highlighted by the arrow; that could be you)
A SAD IRONY

There were a number of distressing and related happenings that occurred prior to the pope's visit to America this September 2015 that set up a strange and troubling irony. These events all happened in the few months before his visit, so they were fresh in the minds of the politicians, the public, and the media. Setting the context for the historic visit of Pope Francis to the east coast were the following related and extremely relevant events.

Planned Parenthood Tapes (public response: comatose, except for concerned groups):

Almost a dozen clandestine tapes were released sequentially showing cordial discussions with top leaders of Planned Parenthood sipping wine and eating salad clearly documenting conversations describing the sale of body parts of aborted babies and sometimes intact baby cadavers. The conversations with undercover individuals posing as "purchasers of parts" were informal and light-hearted and even jovial at times.

The exchanges proceeded with a callousness that showed a complete disregard for the aborted babies or the women in crisis that were seeking help. At one point when there was some question about availability, the "parts" were referred to as mere "line items."

Not a word of concern was spoken regarding the emotional condition of the "mother" before, during or after the abortion or her care. The conversations all centered on the quality of the" product" and how "fresh" and uncontaminated it was – you know, like a rump roast at the butcher shop.

Considerable discussion centered on obtaining and selling parts "on order," and careful manipulation of procedures, language, and descriptions to avoid triggering litigation and/or possible intervention by law enforcement for violations of statues. It was abundantly clear they knew how to play the "game." If one could be so audacious as to refer to this as a game.

It was apparent that most "clients" for the abortions were unaware of or cared about the fate of the aborted baby or remains after the procedure. They should have asked me. I got to observe what happened, first hand, up close and personal, well, at least up until the time everything went black. Of course there was the immediate cry of doctored tapes by Planned Parenthood, echoed by their buddies in the parroting press. Their cries of foul were as transparent as the denials of a little boy sitting in front of an empty cookie jar with chocolate all over his face. The little boy is cute, these reprobates are pathetic.

(The media coverage and public outcry: almost non-existent, disinterest, or indifference – similar to the pope's reaction) (The unedited tapes are widely available on the internet but the originals were recently confiscated during a raid by a federal swat team - nice)

* * * * * * * * * * *

Vote in Congress to de-fund Planned Parenthood (the vote failed):

As of this date, each year, Planned Parenthood receives $500,000,000 (yes, 8 zeros) of government money to fund its operations. Surely, it is prohibited from using the money for performing its 350,000 abortions, but let's be honest; the money is spent for non-abortion services freeing that amount to fund abortions. "It is a devious and dishonest "shell game" a magic slight of hand of accounting. In effect, government funds from good people are being used to perform horrendous acts and violate their religious beliefs. Again this is another case of "gaming" the system – an industry full of deception, deceit, lies, and yes, criminal activity, in this case outright fraud, conspiracy, misappropriation of public funds, and sometimes outright murder of live babies outside the womb.

Mere hours after the pope's speech to a join session of Congress which incidentally ignored the subject of abortion, the Senate voted down a bill that would have stopped this funding. You should thank "Papa" for his gracious assistance. He was of great succor in helping to abolish abortion. It would appear that he threw the abortion issue under the bus, swept it under the rug, and hid it under his vestments.

Vote in Congress banning abortion after 20 weeks (the proven viability age) (failed)

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

**Vote in Congress, for the "Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act" to declare it is an act of murder to kill a** viable living baby **outside the mother that survives an abortion (the vote failed!):**

Imagine how far you have come. You need a proposed piece of legislation to tell you that it is an act of murder to kill a baby living and surviving outside the mother's body. And, you could not get it passed in your Senate! 196 of your representatives and 42 of your senators voted that killing a viable living baby completely outside the mother is not murder. Imagine this is a recorded, documented vote with signatures that will last through the ages, and these "representatives" had no problem penning their names to it.

These persons will be identified by the public and by all their descendants that they authorized the murder of babies. There is no other way of describing it. They have no conscience and no remorse, as dead inside as the babies that will die at their hands – their bloody hands. No further comment really can be made about this one, folks. And, the pope was apparently okay with that. Silence is complicity. God, help you all.

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

The Pope Francis is the 265th direct descendant of Saint Simon Peter, the first pope. As such, he is the spiritual leader of the 1.2 billion declared Catholics in the world. As part of his visit to the USA he was presented with the unprecedented opportunity to address a special joint session of the Congress.

The pope, by mere occupation of his position as the head of the church has the unrivaled presence and audience of the entire world. To enhance that enviable position addressing the joint session of the leaders of the most powerful nation in the world truly multiplies his audience and his influence. With no restrictions or limitations he controls the narrative of his presentation for it to be whatever he wishes. He is adored and revered.

During his visit, the pope was met with those adoring crowds and given the attention and respect that his position demanded. He was a "star" of unequaled influence during this once-in-a-lifetime occasion to change hearts, minds, and souls.

His address in English was over 6 pages containing 3,343 words intensely listened to by the filled chamber as well as the tens of millions of viewers on television and the internet. This was his opportunity, his chance, to address the most pressing moral issues of our time – a monumental moment in history and in his life, and in the lives of Americans – his big chance to make his "Boss" proud. After all, this is his reason for being.

In light of the events of the more than 1,000,000 abortions each year in the USA alone and in particular the events of the previous two months enumerated above, the pope preferred to talk about political issues, lecture the Congress and Americans about their role in the world, lecture the USA, the most generous and welcoming country of immigrants in history, to do more, "global warming," redistribution of income, and the abolishment of the death penalty because we must "protect and defend human life at all stages of development."

apollosrevoirejr

With bravery, conviction, and zeal, in 3343 words he maneuvered around the issue of our time with eight words never uttering the word **"abortion"** or as much as an admonition of its ravaging the morals of your generation. You, down there, will soon be referring to it as the "A" word. Shush, some one may hear or be offended.

Why does a little no-name, dead baby who never existed have to point this out?

An entire paragraph of the address was devoted to the abolishment of the death penalty - a meritorious idea worthy of consideration and implementation. In all the years since 1976, a total of 1414 persons have been executed for crimes in the USA.

In 2015, 20 persons were executed for crimes in the USA.

Ten of the twenty were executed in one state, Texas. Nineteen states legislatively have abolished the death penalty entirely. It would seem to be a non-issue not worthy of your advocacy, "Papa." It already seems to be a done deal and that the issue will soon "die" of its own volition. (No pun intended)

Do you wish to have an issue to advocate? Fifty million babies have been aborted in the same period since 1976, over one million just in the last year.

One million innocent babies executed vs. twenty murders executed – hm?

Let me think – this is a tough one.

Can I use my "ask-the-audience" lifeline for help?

No disrespect meant your holiness, but please get a sense of proportion when you speak. What an insult it was to the millions of good Americans that sacrifice time and resources every day to end the horror of abortion and not to give them the least bit of recognition for their service to God. What an insult it was that they could not be given a few "crumbs" to help their cause of protecting our "most vulnerable" on behalf of mankind. All it would have taken was a few sentences from the leader of 1.2 billion Catholics.

It was a squandered opportunity that will never come again. Shame on you citizens for allowing him to squander it. You, Papa, God's undisputed designated leader of men on Earth are the direct descendant of Simon Peter, - lead your flock, please!

Many who are ambivalent to the subject of abortion hide behind the argument that "it is only a fetus." "It is not a human being yet." "It is only a mass of tissue." It's a spurious rationalization. Your holiness, what is your justification for your ambivalence? Church doctrine unambiguously says it is a person.

God is not happy with you. He is very angry. I am told he has never been this angry. In fact, all of us up here are not pleased with you either. You have not served those who will follow us well. I am not sure what He is going to do.

I am beginning to believe I left the Earth just in time.

Most of the press ignored the stub to pro-life, but at least the "World" magazine said that "Some pro-life supporters were disappointed that the pope didn't directly mention abortion during the speech that came two days after Senate Democrats blocked a late-term abortion ban." It would appear that the word "disappointed" was a bit anemic.

My ordeal was ghastly and gruesome, but I thought that this visit would be an opportunity to save many of my brothers and sisters from the same fate – to "change hearts and minds." After all, is that not the prime directive of the papacy? I was apparently wrong.

And yes, to satisfy your curiosity, I would have been Catholic. But, you knew that, Papa.

I think I feel the need for a pacifier coming on.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

The Flemish baroque artist, Rubens seems to have captured the essence of abortion in the painting "Massacre of the Innocents."

Now multiply this painting by 1.4 billion.

You get the picture?

Rubens is lauded for his ability as a master artist.

It appears he may have been an even greater prophet.

Massacre of the Innocents

Peter Paul Rubens

1611

Yes, Rubens painted this four centuries before "modern medicine" made abortion plentiful and affordable for the masses. Lucky you. But, at least modern abortion is no where near as brutal as he depicts the slaughter. But, maybe that is not the case – at least for these little ones in the painting, they were born, it was quick, they were left intact, they could try to fight back, and their mothers could fight back rather than participate, and their parts were not sold for money. It's a shame "Rubens" is not around to make another painting – you know about abortion. That would be something. Where are you Peter Paul when we need you?

If you are wondering about the comment about "at least they were born" there are some who believe in the concept of "limbo of the infants." Listen to this one, folks!

It is widely believed among many religions that everyone is born with original sin from the actions of Adam and Eve. When a baby is born, this sin is absolved when he or she is baptized immediately after birth. You guessed it. We aborted babies were never "born" and therefore never baptized. We never existed. We became un-baptized babies just drenched in original sin and therefore placed in the "Limbo of the Infants."

This may not be heaven where I am. Who knows what or where it is? I'm not even sure, and I am here. What worries me is I have been here for a while, and I really haven't seen God yet. No welcoming committee, no Saint Peter, nobody. How could I know for sure? There are aborted babies as far as my eyes can see. 1.4 billion. If I had eyes, that is. This has us all a bit worried up here. Where are we, really? Everyone up here is starting to look funny at me. Maybe I should have never brought it up? Never mind.

So if you are thinking, "What's the big deal with this abortion thing?" "The little bugger, fetus, or whatever is going to heaven." "That's not so bad, is it?" You might want to think again. When I figure out where I am, maybe I will write another book about "Limbo." This is not a dance, guys. This is serious. This is not something to take lightly. This is eternity. Heavy stuff – the heaviest. This is not just a slogan on a sign or some expletive shouted by "Madonna" over a loud speaker. Oh, "Madonna," another book.

Not!
**THE FUTILITY OF IT ALL**

Is it not frightening that in less than a generation the evil among you, "the most advanced living creatures on Earth," have been able to not only destroy the instinct of parents to protect their progeny, but to have them willingly cause, instigate, and participate in the destruction of "the fruits of their loins." Just think about that for a moment – how utterly advanced you are. Perhaps depraved, self-aggrandizing, sociopathic, and hopelessly narcissistic might be better monikers. Yes, I think so.

Do you really, deep in your heart, believe you will be forgiven for participating in this unthinkable outrage without sincere sorrow, repentance, and atonement and a promise of cessation? If you are a moral, caring, compassionate, logically thinking, and reasonable person, your answer cannot be in the affirmative.

Someday soon, very soon, go to any place of worship you chose after hours when a service is not being conducted. Alone, in the solitude of that sacred place with only your thoughts to accompany you sit and contemplate these actions. When you are done, objectively determine what you believe in your heart is right. Leave with the conviction that you will not participate in or condone this behavior. Only in that way you can you live the rest of your life having confronted the issue and that you have made the correct decision. For you know that making no decision is a decision of itself – acceptance and yes, complicity.

Only after pledging to purge this behavior from the Earth will you be able to meet your Maker at the end of your life with the confidence that you insured your salvation by carrying out His work in accordance with His commandments. No matter what you think or believe, nothing else in your life on Earth is of this import – saving your soul. How tragic it is to realize that in a cosmic second of indifference and self-indulgence you can relegate your souls to an eternity of suffering. A second for an eternity is hardly a very equitable exchange.

This subject is highly controversial, even combative and divisive. (That is hard to comprehend, but you know it is true.) Much of this has to do with the intensity or absence of the religious beliefs of the observer. Regardless of your belief in a deity or not, the argument should not be to make abortion legal or illegal. This is a specious argument meant to confuse, divide, and detract from the main issues. The main issues are individual attitude, conscience, and morality.

What purpose does abortion serve? Saving the mother's life has increasingly become a spurious argument it is so rare – a fraction of one percent. The tragedies of rape and incest also produce less than one percent of unwanted pregnancies. It has been proven that an adequate supply of stem cells for research and therapies are obtainable from a number of other reliable sources. **That leaves only two major reasons for the majority of abortions performed today – (1) to end an unwanted pregnancy for convenience because of sloth, indifference, and negligence during consensual sex between two irresponsible persons, or (2) to insure or avoid a preference or characteristic desired in the offspring.**
**THE CAUSE**

So, let's see if you can all understand this correctly, before the "debate" goes any further. You are dividing your nation, driving public policy, selecting politicians, making abortion doctors and organizations obscenely prosperous, giving political power and wealth to abortion advocates, vehemently arguing with your neighbors, friends, families, and colleagues, selecting your associates and colleagues, selecting your investments and suppliers, diverting scarce health care resources, endangering the well-being of your souls, marching and shouting, and leaving your religions – and why?

The world is in turmoil, lives and actions are being dictated and the morals of a generation are being polluted because an irresponsible gal can't keep her legs closed and a testosterone dripping guy can't keep his pants zippered up and self-absorbed "parents" would rather have a boy baby with blue eyes. I think that about covers it.

Even if these impetuous and impulsive persons cannot control their desires and drives, are they too indolent to take the most basic of precautions that would guarantee the disappearance of the turmoil and the end of the "debate?" Can you not see or understand this? What is wrong with you?

Finally, I received my pacifier, ahh?

Voluntary absence and the encouragement of personal responsibly and proper behavior are the best ways to stop unwanted pregnancies. But, if that doesn't work, this little gal has managed to get things under control rather well with just a few "tool belts." Sorry, I couldn't resist.

Thank you, Signe Wilkinson. Maybe a little more "diversity" among the perpetrators would have been "helpful." You know, "diversity" the determinant of all things.

Gee, that was so simple.

Now you can move on to eradicate childhood disease, hunger, mutilation, and . . .

And why are your offspring behaving this way? Because you have taught them, yes, taught them, by word and example that they can do anything they want without regard to personal responsibility and devoid of any consequence. You have taught them that there are no such things as personal responsibility, self-restraint, and control. You have taught them that it is always someone else's fault not his or her own fault. You have taught well, and they have learned well and acted accordingly.

"It wasn't me," (sic) "an elephant ate my homework," "it was the Tsunami that did it," "it was global warming that made me take my clothes off," "it was Calvin Klein that made me wear those revealing outfits," "it was internet pornography that hypnotized me," "it was a video game," "George Bush got me pregnant, that's it . . It wasn't me." (sic) It wasn't us. "We were innocent victims." I know. "It was the devil, Satan, old scratch." Now, maybe they might have something there.

You have exposed them to harmful films, videos, music, books, and internet sites. You have given them unprecedented unsupervised freedom and little or no oversight. You have allowed them and even encouraged them to participate in inappropriate behavior. You have allowed others to sexualize them at younger and younger ages. You have directed them to idolize and worship unworthy, unhealthy, and harmful "role models," of which there are a never-ending abundance. You have even encouraged this behavior and condoned it because it is a mirror of your own behavior and actions. To condemn them is to condemn you. And, you wouldn't want to do that, would you?

By the time these moldable little human beings reach adulthood, the die is cast, the behavior established. At this point, there is little opportunity for rehabilitation. You have released them into the world without any ability to make a moral decision about anything on their own. Your generation has truly lost its way, its collective minds, and its souls. It is almost too late to wake you up.

clipartsheep

Sleep well
A birthday celebration

Purposely censored – you get the idea

This is a still photo of the" The queen bey" Her lady-like kindness just shines through.

The photograph of the role model for young girls around the world is obscene.

You should see the video. On second thought, maybe you shouldn't. Maybe, nobody should.

An example of one superior role model praising another

Line up young girls around the world and show your "wares."

Michelle has said it all. The little "bee" icon and exclamation mark are nice touches of affection.

Please ignore the "Follow" icon in the upper right. Thanks.

No further comment is necessary.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Hold your hat. Abortion should be kept legal but with two caveats. It cannot be funded with public tax revenue or any public revenue derived primarily or secondarily from a public source of any type, and it should be carefully regulated as any other medical procedure. If so many of your citizens are concerned that the poor are denied access to abortion, then the solution is simple. Then those abortion advocates should start a private organization to fund the abortions and donate generously to it. Maybe you should put a penny jar in each elementary school.

Talk is cheap.

Generosity, compassion, and concern come so easily when they are funded with the finances of others.

Again, why should a dead baby have to tell you this?

* * * * * * *

Not so fast those abortion advocates that feel vindicated the previous paragraph advocated that abortion be kept legal. There were two caveats. The first was that it not be funded with public resources. This is not an easy requirement to implement. An effort to defund Planned Parenthood was just defeated in Congress as of this date. Passage of this bill soon does not seem likely. No defunding – No legal abortion.

The second stipulation was that abortion clinics be regulated as any other medical facility providing health services. Most of the public just assumes that this is the case. It is not. That fact alone illustrates the stranglehold that the abortion industry has on government.

It is inconceivable that a facility performing this critical procedure would not be regulated as closely as a restaurant or the treatment of animals at a veterinarian. If there is little regulation or oversight then what happened to the concern of women having abortions clandestinely in back alleys. The rule of the land should be "no regulation – no legal abortion." It is just common sense. This is another issue that defies resolution.

Some interesting facts to consider as of the date of this publication:

Twenty-six states do not license abortion clinics

Those states that do license abortion clinics have widely divergent regulations.

Accreditation of clinics by professional organizations is entirely voluntary.

"Abortion services provide 86% of Planned Parenthood's revenue."

Planned Parenthood does not offer prenatal care services.

Planned Parenthood does not offer mammograms and never has.

Planned Parenthood does not offer counseling about alternatives before an abortion.

Planned Parenthood does not offer counseling about regret or grief after an abortion.

Planned Parenthood does not offer services for "complications" after an abortion.

Call 911, my dear.

What was that talk about "concern" for women's health?

Planned Parenthood could not care less about "women's health,"

Whatever "women's health" is supposed to mean.

Few, if any, locations provide "prenatal care" or post-abortion care.
**THE SOLUTION**

Children and adults must be guided to take responsibility and avoid encouraging behavior that will result in an unwanted pregnancy. The goal should be to make unwanted pregnancies and therefore, abortions rare. If pregnancy occurs, they must be taught not to choose abortion, but some other alternative. Those choices should be made more plentiful and accessible. Despite the claims that there are few choices, quietly in the background, there are armies of good people that already participate in the endeavor to facilitate these options. This effort has been cleverly ignored and suppressed by devious means. A massive effort should be made to match couples with unwanted pregnancies with the vast number of worthy couples wanting to adopt. Useless and arbitrary regulations must be eliminated.

Of course you will need to start another wild debate about who comprises a worthy couple – a married couple, a man and a woman, a man and a man, a woman and a man, a woman and a woman and on and on . . . Please, the debates are tiresome and unending. You are adults are you not? Work it out. While you are arguing and debating, babies are dying or are being institutionalized.

If you can stop the arguments, instead of babies dying, the abortion industry will die and all of those who make their living from it will be denied benefit from it.

Abortion actually could have an important purpose, a lesson for you all. For millennia there has been the debate of whether God and Satan exist. A resolution to this question has been illusive with so many opinions and counter opinions. Here is yet another. Many times the manifestation of evil can generate good. Abortion may one such case where this is true. Could abortion shed some light on the existence God and the Devil?

Abortion may be an example of the ultimate morality play of your generation, possibly of all time – a battle of good and evil, God against Satan. Few, if any, conflicts have illustrated this on this scale and of this level of depravity – the mass murder of hundreds of millions of babies by their parents.

A few abortions are a sin. Out of control mass abortions on a global scale, by parents with the accompanying indifference of a world of people are evil personified. Evil on this level must be instigated and guided by an antagonist – quite possibly a single antagonist – Satan. This is not a scientific conclusion but not an unreasonable one. What else or who else could cause seemingly benign individuals to participate in this insanity, this moral vacuum, this heinous mass hypnosis, and this slaughter?

At the same time, out of this morass there are millions of good people who have taken up the cause of stopping the slaughter and protecting these lives – the cause of "good," God's banner.

* * * * * * * * * * * *
**LEGAL OR ILLEGAL?**

Keep abortion lethal, sorry, legal,

a slip of the tongue?

Actually it wouldn't take any effort at all to keep abortion lethal.

## ? ?

The never ending debate continues

while one million babies die each year in the USA

many subsidized or paid for with public funds.

This is the dilemma that has divided Americans, for that matter, humanity, like few others. First, I must apologize for calling this a dilemma. It is so much more. It is the foremost question of your time, possibly for all time. I am trying to reveal that to as many who will listen through this story.

To take on this task seems to be a bit audacious of me, a little guy who was never born, don't you think? Maybe that is a good thing that I am expressing myself now, since I was not given that voice before.

I do not believe any of you who are reading this has a more legitimate right to express yourselves about this subject than I. You know, of course, that all this time you have been vociferously debating about whether I should have existed or not existed without any input from me. Well, you all made your decision. There is no changing that. And we unnamed innocents have paid the price.

Now, who is being audacious?

Charlotte Lozier Institute

If you have noticed when the debate takes place, all that is heard is the disagreement – mostly contrived disagreement, fomented by radical forces. Yes, I am sorry to say from both sides of the issue, but mostly from one side. I'll let you decide which side. But, when there is disagreement between two parties, the best place to begin is where the parties agree, not where they disagree. That is why the debate has continued so long. Surely, there is some common ground. Is there not? Try to find it.

* * * * * * *

Possible abortion points that could form the foundation for agreement:

A fertilized human egg is alive. It is life itself - More complex than any other.

An abortion ends that life.

The egg is encoded with information that defines a unique human like no other.

An abortion forever destroys that unique blueprint. (makes it extinct, if you will, for those preoccupied with the extinction of living things)

Once fertilized, the egg will grow unaided by any outside force other than the viability of the mother.

An abortion extinguishes that growth permanently for those who mourn the killing of any living thing for no legitimate purpose.

The probability that it will grow into a viable human being is substantial. (80-90%)

An abortion always reduces that probability to zero without exception.

Since abortion was made legal, the number performed has increased dramatically.

There are many affordable, even free ways to prevent pregnancies that are accessible to

practically everyone, especially the poor - some requiring no resources at all, only behavior adjustment. (Did someone mention abstinence or responsible adult behavior?)

The "Affordable Care Act" mandates free contraception devices or medications to anyone that requests them, gratis.

Information about preventing pregnancy is available to just about everyone.

Most unwanted pregnancies and abortions are the result of irresponsible behavior.

Few abortions are performed due to the danger of the pregnancy to the mother. (˂ 1%)

Few abortions are performed due to pregnancies caused by rape or incest. (˂ 1%)

Most abortions, by a wide margin, are sought for personal preferences or for the convenience of the participants.

Many of the most vocal proponents of abortion have a financial interest in its increase.

Abortion in the USA is a multi-billion dollar a year business/industry.

As of this date, abortion in the USA is substantially funded with public funds.

Making abortions illegal will not stop abortions.

Making abortions illegal will lead to a large number of unsafe procedures.

Making abortions illegal will cause an increase in maternal deaths and injuries.

Abortion proponents believe a woman should have unlimited right to terminate a pregnancy with no restrictions or oversight.

Most abortion proponents believe in unfettered, unlimited, and unrestricted availability.

The leading abortion provider (Planned Parenthood) provides no prenatal health services to women or mammograms and never has, thus the questionable narrative that they are concerned with the health of a pregnant female.

The USA is honey-combed with other health facilities providing women's health services.

Opposition to abortion is primarily based on religious and moral beliefs.

Comprehensive women's health care facilities outnumber PP facilities 20:1.

States have varying degrees of restrictions and regulation regarding abortion practice.

Statistics regarding abortion are difficult to find and are inconsistent. (Purposefully?)

One statistic that is reliable from all sources is in the USA there are about 1 million/year.

The number of abortions in USA peaked in the 1990's and now has steadily decreased.

Highest abortion rate state in 2011 was New York.

Lowest abortion rate state in 2011 is Mississippi – Wyoming is too low to count.

Black lives matter? – 13% of the USA is black; 37% of USA aborted babies are black.

It does not appear that black babies' lives matter.

There is little governmental oversight regarding the safety of abortion clinics.

* * * * * * *

What do all these commonalities indicate? They indicate that the "issue" is divisive, very divisive. It is disruptive. It consumes scarce public health resources. It is predominantly done for preference and convenience. It is rarely "necessary." It can be all but eliminated through responsible behavior. At least half the populace believes it is immoral, even murder.

Yet, there is enormous agreement on many issues between good people who want to save babies and those who want to keep women "safe." The disagreement is largely with those who participate and profit from abortion. So what is the "debate" about? - Mostly it is the legality of abortion and public funding.

The abortion solution: Focus on improving responsible behavior thus making abortion rare, keeping abortion legal and allowing individuals to determine their own fate, and eliminating public funding completely, thus ending opposition by complicity. Most people could agree on these conditions? Yes?

The most vocal opposition to these suggestions will come from those who maintain power and wealth if the status quo remains. Do not be influenced by their attempts to disrupt reasonable solutions and continue the debate. Reject those attempts and use common sense, logic, and moral thinking to make your decision.

* * * * * * * * * * *

From the first moment of their appearance on Earth, man and woman and all their progeny have been in conflict. It is not new. The conflict appeared when mankind was given free will. It has been the blessing and the curse of his habitation of the planet.

There are some who will never take responsibility for their own actions. Society should not concern itself about them. They have the free will that God gave them and the Constitution grants them that freedom. Their sin is between them and their Maker to live with and die with. It is their soul for them to lose. They will commit the sin whether abortion is legal or it is not, just like any other sin. Murder is illegal, yet it flourishes. No one can save their souls for them. It is they who must save their own souls. One thing is absolutely certain, they must face the consequences of their action alone as everyone eventually must. You will all be alone when you die as I was.

* * * * * * * * * * *

No good and compassionate person wants a woman to have an illegal abortion at the hands of a butcher. Those were actions from the past of desperate people in crisis and quacks. Those days were a horror and hopefully will be left in the past.

Let legal abortion take place in a controlled, professionally-regulated, and safe environment and leave those horrors in the past. You should not deny that.

If you do not leave them in the past by making abortions illegal, those you oppose will use that as proof that you are heartless and hate women for many will still seek abortions illegally. You already witnessed what that was like.

Pro-abortion marches

What do these images have in common? They all represent activist who demand that abortion be left legal. That's the entire reason they are marching. That's the reason they are in the streets – to keep abortion legal. They cry: "The pro-lifers want to overturn Roe vs. Wade." The pro-lifers want us to die in back alleys. "The pro-lifers want to control our bodies." "The pro-lifers want to force motherhood on us."

Did you ever think – what would happen if this battle cry – "the weapons" – pro-lifers want to control our bodies \- they want to kill us – they want us to return to back alley abortions were taken away. What would be left for pro-abortion advocates to demonstrate about? How would they gather a following? What would be left to debate? Give them what they want. They shout that they are masters of their bodies. What they fatally ignore is they are masters of their souls as well – or more accurately masters of loosing their souls not for a lifetime, but for eternity. And, as previously mentioned, they may be also the masters of their aborted babies' souls by condemning them to the "Limbo of the Innocents." No one knows for sure. Would you be willing to risk that? It is not just all about you. This is not a political game or a power struggle to get what you want in life at all cost. You may have been convinced that it is, but it is not.

Why waste valuable but limited resources on a loosing battle? Does anyone really think he or she is going to change the mind of one demonstrator? I think not. Look at their defiance, their faces, and their angry, indecent, and vulgar signs. They are stoked for battle. Take away their "battle cry" and let them do what they want and concentrate on convincing the public that abortion is wrong. It's murder and all the consequences that accompany it. It will take time. Be patient but determined. But, it will be successful. The tactic of trying to overturn Roe vs. Wade has failed for 44 years. Here you are 55 million abortions later.

The battle is not abolishing legal abortion. The battle is returning civilized people to moral behavior. When moral behavior is the norm, the abortion movement will be superfluous and die of its own accord along with its advocates and profiteers.

It is for the participants to confront the consequences of their actions during their time on Earth and after. God gave women free-will to save their souls or to lose them. Gentlemen do not believe that are you immune from these consequences. It took two to cause the tragedy. Two must assume the responsibility. Your souls are equally at risk – no free rides, boys.

Compassionate and moral humans today must strive to make having an elective abortion a stigma in society. It will take some time for this to happen, just as it took some time to brainwash a generation into thinking it is okay for mothers to kill their own flesh and blood, the fruit of their existence on Earth. If individuals have the courage to come out of their self-induced moral comas, it will happen.

While the two groups are combating each other in a never-ending "debate" over this, fifty-five million abortions have taken place in the USA. The "debate" has been a fabrication, a "slight of hand," a distraction, while the tragedy marches on unrelentingly in the shadows. The debate continues and so do the abortions.

The decision to abort has become so widespread, so accepted, and so casual that many times it is made with little angst or uneasiness. Advocates even feel free to jest about it on TV talk shows. One female personality commenting about Donald Trump's inauguration saw fit to quip, "Hurry ladies, you better get your abortions now." She had not the least bit of conscience of mocking the religious beliefs of tens of millions by diminishing and denigrating the value of life. Others on the panel were unfazed and quite amused by her aphorism.

It is time for you to work together and close the ceaseless debate. The conflict is only a means for the participants in the abortion industry to accumulate power and riches while the unsuspecting populace is being misled, bewildered, alienated, distracted, and befuddled.

Decades ago, the hucksters of the abortion culture, entered the public square, started a brawl, and then left to observe the resulting mêlée safely and anonymously from the other side of the fence. Once protected in their haven from the fray, they plotted their continuing strategy using the created distraction to further their evil. Good people on both sides of the issue must stop the fighting, slam the gate, expose and isolate the perpetrators where they can do no further harm.

* * * * * * * * * *

Here are a few words about unwanted pregnancies resulting from the tragedies of rape and incest. The one thing that is certain is that these words will probably make everyone on both sides of the abortion issue angry. However, the purpose of these comments is not to gain favor with one group or another, but to protect the well-being of a woman who is most certainly in crisis.

There seems to be an almost universal natural knee-jerk reaction that in these cases, abortion is the immediate and only answer. This mind-set spills over to the decision making of the victim in these circumstances. There is almost an implied assumption, pressure if you will that the rape victim does not want to carry the baby to term. That should not be the supposition.

The victim of the rape has gone through at least one traumatic experience, possibly many traumas over a long period of time. The unwanted pregnancy may have been the culmination of many attacks by an acquaintance or family member or more than one.

Once the pregnancy occurs, she is now asked to go through an equally traumatic ordeal - that of being pressured to have an abortion. It is totally conceivable that the rape victim may have a strong pro-life perspective and find it abhorrent to have an abortion regardless of the cause.

The point is the victim should not be pressured one way or the other to have an abortion or not. The decision should be hers alone without undue outside influences. The only advice given should be to present unbiased options and their potential consequences. Once she has made her decision, every resource should be made available to her to execute that decision **including rejecting abortion**.

Absolutely nothing should be done to add to a trauma that most could not even imagine. This is a special circumstance that should be outside the debate of pro-choice/pro-life and kept that way. If the issue is kept in the debate, pro-abortionists will use it as proof that pro-lifers are cold-hearted and hate women. Don't let them do that. Don't give them another slogan to paint pro-life advocates as being comatose to the horrors of rape victims, because they are not insensitive to their plight. Pro-life advocates are almost always more sensitive to the plight of the rape victim. They have no financial claim in the matter. Rape and the health of the mother are both less than one percent of contentious pregnancies.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Consider this one last thought regarding the decision to choose life or not. I never met my "mother." I have no idea what her circumstance was or how she became pregnant or came to decide to abandon me. (more accurately, end my life to use civil language) Her reasoning or her thinking could have been the result of her upbringing, her environment, her family, or her friends or some other factor or factors. I guess that does not matter at this point. What matters is that I was not consulted in making that decision. I had no voice, so her input was not complete. Quite possibly, I wasn't even given a thought.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

But, just imagine for a moment if, once reaching reasoning age, my "mother" could sit in a room with only me, face to face with her child. What would she say to me? Would she have the "courage" to look me in the eye and tell me she decided to deny me my chance at life and exchange it for her college education, a career or a new house, or a trip around the world, or whatever, was more important than my life with her - more important than the lifetime of love I could give her – more important than manifesting the succession of her family I could give her, her grandchildren – a continuation of her family blood line? I seriously doubt it.

I ask you to ponder what your explanation to me would be if you were in that situation.

**It is so much easier to decide another's fate when you remain anonymous, when you don't have to explain your reasoning in person**.

It's harsh, but the word cowardly comes to mind.

The fact that this is a permanent, life or death determination concerning your offspring, your flesh and blood, raises the dialog to a whole new level. Think about it.

Obviously, this is a hypothetical scenario that could never happen physically. But, consider that the encounter may manifest itself in your mind many years later when the "what if's" start, the doubts, the guilt. The act cannot be reversed. Being sorry does no good. There is no one to whom you can convey your sorrow and your apology. The victim is not there any longer to forgive you.

Think about that, please before you make your decision.

I have been told up here that it is impolite to be harsh and uncaring. It is not my intention to make you agonize, torment, or be uncomfortable regarding this subject. I would not want to do that. That would be cruel and unkind.

I take that back.

Yes, I do want to make you uncomfortable.
**CHANGING HEARTS AND MINDS**

An observation about the issue of keeping abortion and contraception legal

(I mistakenly typed ". . . keeping abortion lethal" instead of ". . . keeping abortion legal") Could that have been a parapraxis? I love that word. Could it be, I got it right the first time?

Recently, a very kind person was gracious enough to read a draft of this book. She thoughtfully commented, questioning the apparent dichotomy between religious doctrine and recommendations in this chapter. More precisely, reference was made regarding legal abortion and using condoms vs. the prohibitions of those activities by religious doctrine. The point was well made, and quite valid – a real thought provoker and dilemma. Frankly that was a haunting quandary throughout this writing.

How can these two concepts coexist? The answer in the most obvious and purest sense is they cannot. It seems to be "impossible." But, this issue is too important to give up and accept what appears to be obvious and insoluble.

This is the dilemma that good people "doing nothing" for so long have caused. Good people have been in a state of apathy and indifference for so long that evil has been allowed to slither under your tent like a poisonous serpent making easy solutions no longer possible.

The untreated patient is lying on his death bed and traditional methods cannot be used to bring him back to health, if that is even possible. All that is left is for the snake to take its deadly bite. The moral world is that far gone. You must be inventive if you are to kill the serpent and save the patient.

A common phrase used is "two objects cannot occupy the same space at the same time" – another example of a seemingly impossible circumstance. (I believe it is called the "Pauli Exclusion Principle") But, in quantum mechanics multiple particles can occupy the same quantum "space" at the same time providing they have a different spin and energy – the seemingly impossible made possible. The same can happen with leaving abortion legal and religious doctrine.

In reality, the co-existence of religious doctrine and abortion is occurring right now. That is the norm. Both exist. The problem is that abortion is winning and religious doctrine is being ignored by the masses. That must be reversed. But, while that is being done, the two can continue to coexist especially if the coexistence has a lofty end purpose eventually resulting in abortion being rare, or even extinct.

* * * * * * * * * *

This less than perfect "plan" proposes to change attitudes regarding the acceptability of abortion while at the same time, keeping abortion and contraception legal.

The conflict between pro-life and pro-abortion is very much like a modern-day war – it is a high-stakes, life and death war – nothing less. It involves two opposing sides and a great many in the middle either remarkably undecided or ambivalent. The world is the battlefield strewn with hundreds of millions of lost lives of the unborn and ruined lives of those living.

Not insignificant are the emotional scars left that many of the active and passive participants of abortion must carry for the rest of their lives.

Like in a declared war, little attention, if any, is given to this emotional trauma inflicted on those who remain living returning from the war. The trauma is hidden in the recesses of the minds of the participants, those performing the abortions as well as those having the abortions, away from sight, invisible and therefore ignored. Don't delude yourself that this is not an issue, because it manifests itself as a significant delayed torment.

Memorial for Unborn Children

Sculpture by Slovakian Sculptor Martin Hudacek

captures post abortion pain, mercy, and forgiveness quite powerfully

The woman obviously has remorse and sorrow.

God, represented by the child that never was, grants forgiveness.

The life-long wounds suffered by the purveyors of abortion, the women who aborted, and all that associate with and care about them are dismissed, yet have an immeasurable negative effect on millions. You might call it "collateral damage" from the war. The wounds do not heal because the deed is irreversible; a life was taken, often for trivial pursuits, and cannot ever be returned.

Particularly absent from those addressing the consequences of abortion are those who profit from it. Why should they care or bother themselves after the deed is done? Actually, they do actively involve themselves in the aftermath by ignoring the pain and even displaying distain and contempt by vilifying those who attempt to expose the tragic aftereffects of abortion. Their participation is purposeful, planned, coordinated, and despicable. They have a fawning press and an army in the "entertainment" industry to feed their abortion machine. There is nothing entertaining about their deeds.

They have successfully silenced any attempt to address the damage by effectively convincing the masses that the aftermath of pain and regret does not exist. The victims suffer in their private purgatory for fear of exposure.

Two authors who have documented this hidden scourge of society are Theresa Burke, Ph.D. and David C. Reardon, Ph.D. in the book below. Their coverage of the subject is thorough, well-researched, and authoritative. Reading it will be an epiphany for most.

" **Forbidden Grief"**

The Unspoken Pain of Abortion

<http://afterabortion.org/2004/forbidden-grief/>

Brava Theresa and Bravo David

Many times there is the torture of imagining what that life would have been like if it had only been allowed to flourish. This phenomenon often occurs long after involvement as consciences replay the tragedy over time and surface many years later as a torment that cannot be consoled.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

The pro-abortion army does not have as many soldiers but it is well-organized, it has formidable and numerous allies, and it is well-equipped with the weapons of the government, the media, influential and vocal public figures, Hollywood, opportunistic politicians, and the profit mongers of the abortion industry.

This army is well-funded from the private sector and has a direct pipeline to the coffers of the government and powerful organizations with deep pockets and defined agenda. This monster feeds unrelentingly on the public teat because of the disinterest of the pacifists who don't want to involve themselves in the fray. (They call themselves many names to justify staying on the sidelines and "evaluating" while evil flourishes. They call themselves what they will, but in reality they are the limp "wet noodle society" - the "independents," "the undecided," "the thoughtful" who rationalize their inaction until the battle is all but lost. They arrive late on the scene when the deed is done.) The subject is far too complex for a hasty conclusion. It requires "thoughtful contemplation."

* * * * * * * * * * * *

The pro-life army is a grass roots outfit, made of millions of moral individuals of conscience from the kitchen tables and plains of America. Rather than an army, the groups are a self-funding unconventional, decentralized militia similar to the brave patriots during the American Revolutionary War and the members of the French Resistance during World War II.

By necessity they are self-supplied, self-funded, and self-equipped, but highly motivated. They bear the dual burdens of fighting the war and mustering the resources necessary for that war while participating in productive everyday lives. They represent a strong opposition to pro-abortion, and that is why they are hated and vilified for fear of bolstering their numbers and changing hearts and minds. They are "dangerous radicals" who hate women and need to be accordingly vilified and annihilated.

The standard tactic here of pro-abortion forces is to conduct their evil deeds and then to maximize confusion by accusing their enemy of being the evil that they are.

For that matter, this is the standard tactic of all those opposed to a responsible, orderly and moral citizenry. The goal is to vilify virtuous and honorable behavior, overload and collapse the system, create the chaos of anarchy and then gain power during the mêlée to institute their vision of "utopia."

This is not a conspiracy theory, it is a fact established from history. It has been brilliantly executed. And, most terrifyingly it is in its final stages of success. It is insidious in its scale and its goals. It is being conducted on a global scale. Its true nature will soon be revealed to the uninformed and the disbelieving. The scale of the cataclysm of abortion is hard to comprehend, but even more difficult to understand is that it's only a miniscule part of the plan.

* * * * * * * * * *

During World War II, in his psychopathic delusions, Hitler started battles on many fronts, diluting his forces. Apparently, a major miscalculation was battling the vastness of Russia and its forces well into the winter, while his troops were improperly prepared for the lack of infrastructure in Russia, the mud from the rains, the brutal cold, snow, ice, and wind of the winter. Indiscriminately, he took on many simultaneous battles, over-extending his forces and as a consequence tactically lost his entire campaign and destroyed his country and much of the civilized world in his quest for power.

The pro-life crusade may suffer a similar fate if it attempts to fight many fronts simultaneously. Such a "grass roots army" must, by necessity be cautious to "pick its battles" to conserve it resources against a formidable foe. It is for that reason that it is suggested that the first battle to be fought and won is the battle to change the hearts and minds of the American people regarding the acceptability of abortion. This absolutely can be done. It must be done aggressively, but it must be accomplished first.

It means returning Americans to their normal state of civility before all this madness began. They were at that golden place of morality since the nation's inception, and now they must be convinced to return "home." They will return if you take a leadership role and implore and guide them.

The battles of reducing promiscuous behavior, uncontrolled sex, and artificial means of preventing pregnancy are engagements that can be waged simultaneously with the battle of winning hearts and minds. These battles can be won without decimating scarce resources. The time is right and the tide is turning. People are awaking to the horrors of the abortion industry with each new revelation. The country is beginning to ignite. The advocacy of proper behavior will return many fold benefits by assisting in the elimination of many other scourges on society. There are many others attempting to eliminate the results of irresponsible behavior: Crusades against substance abuse, the battle against crime, Improve behavior and all these problems diminish. Why not have all these disparate groups cooperate since all of their goals can be achieved by eliminating the source of all their problems: improper, immoral, irresponsible behavior. Get together folks. Pro-life folks find friends in these allied groups. Talk to each other. You have much in common. Together you form a formidable force for good.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

After the attack on Pearl Harbor, Japanese Naval Marshal General Isoroku Yamamoto is proported to have written in his diary, "I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve." You can hope and act so that once again America, the sleeping giant, awakens with a resolve to eliminate abortion and return to the goodness it once had before it is too late.

The battle that will be difficult to win in the present moral climate is the battle to make abortion illegal. To commence the battle now would be premature and destined to face defeat. The memory, visions, and consequences of "back alley/coat hanger" abortions is still raw in the public mind and will quickly allow a backlash to form with a little "incentive" from pro-choice. Pro-choice would love to fight that battle now with their gorilla tactics. It would be brutal and not winnable. You will have given them an additional weapon, a revival of the fraudulent battle cry, "War on Women."

Pro-choice will jump at the chance to prove that pro-life is truly conducting that "War on Women," that it despises women, wants to kill them, and wants to coerce them to bring unwanted pregnancies to term by "enslaving" women to be "baby mills."

They will successfully muster their forces and the public with a complicit media, and conduct a cogent and successful smear campaign. It may provide a strong enough impetus to actually destroy the pro-life movement entirely. This battle, at this time should be avoided like the plague. It is another case of their defining the war to their advantage. Never let the enemy (and they are an enemy) define the war, the battlefield, the tactics or the timing.

This conflict cannot be allowed to happen or to continue to happen actually. Pro-life must deny them this weapon by being patient and "pick its battles" and "pick the timing" of those battles. This is one battle to be conducted in the future. But, waged it must be, at the proper time. Pro-life cannot afford to waste its forces on a mistimed and ill-planned campaign that would almost certainly be doomed or cause significant damage to its resources and efforts.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

The invasion of northern France during WWII, named "Operation War Lord," (D-Day) June 6, 1944 was the largest amphibious operation in history. It was a success, at great cost, and a turning point in the defeat of Germany. Similarly, the battle to eliminate or at least minimize abortions can be considered the largest operation to save human lives in history. The lives lost during that war pales compared to the number of lives lost to abortion.

Did Operation War Lord happen by accident or by General Eisenhower yelling "charge" and the troops just floated across the English Channel to invade Normandy? Of course it did not just happen. It took two years of planning and preparations and great sacrifice to insure success. That's common sense. Any great endeavor requires massive planning.

Eliminating or even minimizing abortion will not take place having someone yell "charge." Establishing a nebulous goal such as "ending abortion," or overturn "Roe vs. Wade" will not suffice. That has been tried for the last 44 years to no avail. The campaign must develop a strategic plan that is systematically executed in the right manner on a calculated time schedule.

A vigorous campaign must be conducted immediately to change the hearts, minds and souls of Americans. Then, the timed battle can begin and quickly be won when there is a probability of success. Pro-choice forces want a protracted battle because they have the resources to engage a prolonged conflict. Pro-life does not. Pro-choice has been fighting their never-ending battle of their own making and definition on their turf for 44 years with the deep pockets of confiscated public funds. That has to change.

Take your lead from another war that has failed miserably costing trillions and killing millions – "The War on Drugs." Illicit drugs have been illegal forever. Did they disappear? Why not? As long as a demand is there it will be met aggressively by some "entrepreneur." The war did not effectively combat the real cause: out-of-control behavior.

The world has become addicted to a new drug, abortion. Making it illegal will not make it disappear as long as the demand is there. Why don't you folks down there ever learn? You have this monumental failure staring at you to learn from and you are doing the same thing over again.

When the war against abortion is successful, quite possibly the campaign to make abortion illegal may never need to be waged if enough minds, hearts, and souls are returned to sanity. Wouldn't that be amazing to see those store front "clinics" closed and boarded up because there were no "customers?"

* * * * * * * * * * * *

The foundation of this methodology is to attempt to unite "opposing" sides by asking them to "stand down" temporarily in this war to make abortion illegal - asking those following religious doctrine to be resolute, but reasonable and patient and those truly concerned with freedom for women, their rights and their health to understand that pro-life has the same goals and is not the enemy.

This union should serve to finally expose, isolate, and decimate the voyeurs and profiteers of the abortion industry that remain. **For this all must pray**. ("all must hope," for those who reject the existence of a deity. You must be inclusive and united.)

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Speaking of deity, God, Allah, Buda, Spirit, Creator, master, maker, higher power . . .

One final word should be mentioned about the existence and belief in a deity and its relevance to this issue. Those who believe in a deity and those who do not should avoid being at odds on this matter. It is not just religious doctrine and belief in a deity that makes abortion abhorrent. It is also human decency and common sense that make it horrifying.

It seems inconceivable that good, decent and civilized people, believing in a deity or not cannot both see the horror of indiscriminately and wantonly promoting (yes, promoting) the mass annihilation and obliteration of a living baby, organism, fetus, embryo, thing, mass, whatever from within a woman's most sacred vessel on a scale unprecedented in human history. It is just not believable that the two camps cannot agree on this.

It sounds like a science fiction/horror movie, only it is "real life," or more appropriately "real death." The story line eclipses the most revered horror movies of all time. If otherwise decent people believe that there is no problem with this, then what have you become?

Does disbelief in a higher power automatically relegate humans to become a mob of uncaring monsters with knee-jerk reactions when someone mentions "religious doctrine?" I don't think so. I hope not.

* * * * * * * * * * *

Remember a good deal of modern civil society and our system of jurisprudence is based on natural law and religious doctrine. Strip away belief in a deity and there still remain substantial structure and guidelines to civilly coexist with your fellow humans. Without these guidelines you would return to anarchy and barbarism. I didn't think that would appeal to you.

So, if you have no belief in a deity, do not allow yourself to be influenced by devious forces with selfish agenda who roam among you when confronting those who do have faith – please. Those with faith are not the enemy. They wish you no harm or ill will. They just want a return to basic decency and sanity. Take inventory of what you are doing and act accordingly. Reject the mob mentality and act as human individuals united against evil. Don't let others think and act for you. You don't need to become an abortion advocate just because you don't think that religion or God are cool.

Our current state of affairs

" **Splitting the baby"**

The baby

Pro-abortion Pro-life

In the meantime the baby dies

and the abortion industry

is hiding in the shadows

profiteering from the dispute
**THE PROPOSAL**

Defeating this affliction on society cannot be done in the courts or by marching on Washington or by making posters. It has not worked for forty-four years, and it will not work in the future. It must be won in your minds, in the minds of those around you, in your homes, in your communities, in your schools, community institutions, in your houses of worship, on street corners, in meeting halls, and even in the "social media." There is such concentration on trumpery in the social media; why not use it for good? This reversal must be accomplished by instilling morality in the minds of your children who will comprise the next generation. It is they who must carry the torch of sanity, since you have woefully failed to do so.

In theory, a radical reduction in elective abortions could take place nine months from now without making abortion illegal. Who in their right minds could oppose this? The answer to that question is - those who are involved in the abortion industry for power, status, and wealth – those who have made it a business. Wouldn't it be wonderful if they held an "abortion rights" rally . . . and no one showed up except these immoral profiteers and reprobates that fly the abortion plane into oblivion?

* * * * * * *

Some may be tired of this "preaching." I have earned the right, no, demand the right to preach by having given the only thing I had, my life. I will stay silent no longer.

There are those who believe it is not possible to keep abortion legal and at the same time effectively eliminate it or greatly reduce it. Rejection of this idea should not come too quickly. What if there were a cogent example of a harmful behavior that was converted from completely accepted, widespread, and even "cool" to being unacceptable and scoffed upon and considerably reduced? Would such an example change your mind?

* * * * * * * * * *

There was a time when a wide-spread behavior was common and even encouraged. It was expensive, unhealthy, and widely promoted. It was shown to harm not only those who engaged in it, but also those around them. It was repulsive to those who did not participate. Those who did not participate had no voice in its regulation or control. The particulars sound very much like those of abortion. Yet, in one generation, the behavior was made to have a strongly negative stigma attached to it, so strong that it radically changed public behavior.

Those that participated in the behavior were shamed as weak, lacking civic duty and will power. They were quarantined to practice their behavior in selected locations and prohibited from partaking altogether in hundreds of thousands of places all over the country. Participants were heavily taxed for the right to indulge in this behavior. They were castigated and forced to pay substantial rate increases for insurance of many types. In a short time, the participants were shamed by society and became pariahs.

**The earth did not open. The sky did not fall. There were no demonstrations. There were no marches or riots. Mobs did not storm Washington. The world did not end**.

Yet, with all of this, the behavior was never made illegal or even difficult to participate in or to obtain the means to continue the behavior. Even now, decades later, there is no movement to make it illegal in the future. Citizens in a free society are given the latitude to behave as they wish by taking personal responsibility for their own actions. But, in the end it was the perception in a reasonable society that pressured a new mindset, a new attitude to dominate. That is what is needed regarding the death of babies by abortion; not a never-ending debate and futile battle.

* * * * * * *

If it has not been obvious by now, the described behavior is smoking. Society spoke and people listened. Did smoking disappear? No. Did smoking lessen? Yes, just a change in attitude cut the number of smokers by more than half, without prohibition, without a law, without coercion, without marches, without turmoil, without tumult, without war.

Imagine if the number of abortions would be reduced by the same factor. That would represent 500,000 abortions less per year – not a pittance – a half million innocent lives. And consider that reducing the number of abortions should be much easier than reducing the number of smokers. Indiscriminate smoking has been around forever, and it is addictive. The concept of abortions on demand has been prevalent for only forty years and does not involve physical addiction. Before the idea is dismissed; think about it.

Percentage of smokers in the USA – 1965-2005

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

The problem is this. Presently you have not the will to assume the responsibility of teaching your children right from wrong, good from evil, and you will pay the price for your dereliction unless strong and swift remedial action is taken to change your path.

Those of you who want to reduce the number of abortions by a change in attitude and those of you who want it to be legal with reasonable restrictions and oversight can both reach your goals. You both need to unite, not combat each other. You should become one group advocating these two principals. Both of you can co-exist.

The instigators within the remaining group that includes those who promote it, profit from it, encourage it to exist unregulated, unlimited, and cultivate it to flourish and grow need to be identified, exposed, distained, and removed from decision making and influence and relegated as enemies of your civil society. They need to be rejected for the harm they are doing to society – harm they are inflicting for their insatiable and insidious quest for control, influence, and wealth. They are profiteering from the execution of babies, my brothers and sisters in the womb. How much more insidious can they be?

These purveyors of death are not hard to find. They have spent decades relishing the spotlight. They celebrate their arrogance and pomposity. We know who they are, and they should be shunned not worshiped. They proudly drape themselves in clothing declaring, "I had an abortion." They shout their depraved deeds as a badge of honor.

"Do we really need to **inconvenience** ourselves for 18 years just to have a baby?"

Yes, they really did say a baby is an inconvenience. After all, an abortion is normal.

When the members of both groups die, each will have to answer for the position they took – the lives they led on Earth. Which group do you want to be in when the last judgment comes? Which group will you be in? Do not hesitate to make this decision, for no one knows the time or the place of his final judgment. You don't believe you will be judged?

Then, take your chances.

One hundred percent of all abortion advocates are alive today. But, I am dead, am I not?

And, you advocates of this act are the cause of my demise.

* * * * * * * * * *

Here are just a few stupid questions. Remember I have not even been born so I need to know.

Exactly how does abortion improve or care for the health of the mother?

If a woman must have total control of what she does with her body, then why is it illegal for her to commit suicide?

If a woman must have total control of what she does with her body, then why is it illegal for her to sell her body for sex?

If a woman must have total control of what she does with her body, then, why is it illegal for her to sell her organs?

If a woman must have control of what she does with her body, then why can't she appear nude in public?

There is one answer to all these questions and more – a civilized society has established norms of behavior that limit what she or he can do with their bodies.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Why do many mourn the mistreatment and killing of animals, and yet many have no problem with mutilating and killing babies? And then they rationalize that we are not humans yet? Some even mourn the killing of fish, insects, and plants. These persons must try to get a sense of perspective and proportion on life.

Many women were unfortunate enough to have miscarriages or pregnancies that for various reasons did not result in a live birth. Most mourn and grieve the loss of their babies and ponder about the life that never was – the love that could have been given and the love that could have been received. How glorious it would have been if I had been granted the same respect and deference. I would have loved and been loved.

All of you have the right to inhabit and benefit from the bounty of your planet. Some creatures seem more "honored" than others to be showered with this abundance. I think I may have been absent the day they established the list of beneficiaries chosen to exist.

I received no bounty from the planet. I didn't even get to see or walk on the planet. Who knows where my body is and what was done with it? If there is someone, they will not admit it. Apparently, I became fertilizer to produce the bounty given to others.

Maybe I did have a purpose, albeit not much of one.

It hardly seemed worth the trouble.

No one mourned "me."

I wasn't even given the epithet of "me"

If I were granted a burial and a tombstone, it would have read,

" **Here lies it."**

The bounty granted to some
**ABOUT MURDER**

Judging by the number of downloads of this book, or should I say the lack of downloads; I have probably lost at least half the few readers who were unfortunate enough to fall for downloading this book. Certainly this chapter should lose almost all the other half.

The subjects of abortion and murder and similar "unpleasant," yet unbelievably common yet colossal matters are too overwhelming for the modern mind to comprehend or intelligently absorb or contemplate. Thus, you have the reticent and timorous reactions to their mention. Instead, the contemporary citizenry need to be entertained, distracted, amused, delighted, diverted, titillated, and aroused or all of the above at the same time. There is so much pleasure to experience and so little time in which to do it. Most don't understand how short that time actually is and how little pleasure there is to experience.

My apologies, my next books will deal with passion, illicit and uncontrolled deviant sex, bestiality, game shows, the joys of incest, unending car stuff, zombies, the latest electronic devices, video games and movies, inane chasing an object from one end of a play surface to another, and cute kitty cats and their lovers. That should get me on the "New York Times" best sellers' list – a dubious distinction these days at best. Don't you dare tell your friends about this book and put me on the list – don't worry, there is so little chance of that. I don't think anyone up here has ever gotten on that list – well maybe a few.

Here you go.

" **Murder,"**

is the purposeful killing of a human being by another human being.

" **Thou shall not kill"**

It seems quite simple and straight forward - but, not so fast – not so simple and not so straight forward. Today, you need another definition believe it or not.

" **Human being"**

Homo sapiens from conception to death

Ah, therein lies the rub. Humans have tailored that definition and nuanced it to justify their behavior. If you are among those humans, then you are responsible for my death and you really should not read further. Nothing I can say or do will ever change your mind. What are you going to do with all the time saved by not reading this? Silly me, you can read all the other book genres that I listed above. There are plenty. Problem solved. Thanks, for reading this far. Now I really don't have much of an audience.

Now that our little group, and I do mean little, is down to a manageable number, we can cover this subject in more detail and with some degree of thoroughness. Just don't share the details. You don't want to become a pariah, do you?

Another complication in discussing murder is not so much the act but the circumstances, awareness, scope, and motivation. Wow, this is starting to get complicated. I thought this was supposed to be simple? Although this is getting complex, it needs to be discussed if you are to put abortion into context.

There are many acts that fall into the category of murder within the two definitions listed above. The subject is unbelievably complex and to gain an intelligent understanding would require degrees in law, divinity, psychology, criminology, and more along with decades of professional practice. This is meant as a superficial overview of murder to locate abortion on the scale and scope of the subject. The assumption for this discussion is that human life begins at conception. This is not negotiable. Take it or leave it. I should know; I lived it. Or, should I say, "I died it."

Many categories have an associated a "slippery slope" component, implying that the original concepts seem to have some merit or reasoning to support them, but can and do get out of control very quickly. Abortion has proven to be a notable exception to the "slippery slope" syndrome. It started from the beginning revealing itself as an evil chasm with vertical walls leading into a bottomless pit – no slippery slope here.

The basic categories considered are as follows. The asterisk (*) indicates those categories most discussed when "protecting life" or "pro-life" discussions take place.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Abortion*

This is the primary, largest scale pro-life issue by an enormous margin and therefore most commonly "discussed."

Impact and scope: unimaginable in the history of mankind. (one million/year in the USA; 50,000,000. in the USA since 1973; 1,400,000,000. world-wide since 1975.)

Duration: On such a scale, a very recent phenomenon (40 years)

Trend: Modest decrease in the past two decades.

Deliberate killing for personal gain or power

Little discussion is required for this category, since most civil societies would agree this is a grievous act to be condemned.

Impact and scope: moderate 15,000/year; exception under brutal dictatorship

Duration: Since the beginning

Trend: Substantial decrease in last two decades; modest increase in recent years.

Self-defense or defense of another

This category can be complex, but generally most civil societies would agree that this is acceptable and justifiable to kill to save another life unjustly endangered.

Impact and scope: arguably a positive societal impact and limited scope

Duration: Since the beginning

Trend: Mild increase

Accidental killing* - auto

Accidental killing is generally condoned as long as there is no evil intent, negligence, or recklessness. These would not be considered murder. But, impaired driving would be considered a type of murder if there was a reasonable expectation that the driver would be involved in a fatal accident, which is the case.

Impact and scope: auto for impaired driving about 20,000/year

Duration: Since the beginning – more prevalent the more complex and mechanized the society.

Trend: Substantial decrease per passenger mile, mainly due to technology

Euthanasia (physician assisted suicide)

Up until recently this has been a taboo activity. Now it is accepted in a half-dozen states as assisted suicide but generally not approved by the public or religion. It has a substantial "slippery slope" component since psychological exam of patients is not required and nefarious motives are possible or even probable. In Oregon 859 deaths were recorded in 18 years, but steadily rising. ("Death with Dignity Act") It is approved in some European countries and not uncommon, especially Holland.

Impact and scope: limited impact and scope. Numbers are negligible presently.

Duration: Very recent development

Trend: Accelerating increase

Mercy killing/Merciful Death

This involves one person ending the life of another in extreme suffering and pain and imminent death. It seems to be illegal most everywhere, but rarely successfully prosecuted using insanity plea. This is a difficult one to get statistics on, but the numbers appear to be even lower than that of Euthanasia.

Impact and scope: extremely limited impact and scope. Numbers apparently negligible.

Duration: Probably since the beginning

Trend: Mild increase

Societal Execution

Societal execution is almost a non-issue since there were only 12 executions in the USA last year. It is outlawed in 19 states.

Impact and scope: Very costly to implement; scope non-existent.

Duration: Since the beginning, but most likely will be eliminated soon in the USA

Trend: Marked decline

Causal death(s)

This type of death occurs when a government, company, or person establishes a law, policy, or decree that puts individuals in harms way with a probability of death. Many times this is accomplished using purposeful famine or drought to kill a certain "undesirable" faction.

Impact and scope: moderate to high impact and scope. Reliable statistics difficult to find

Duration: Since the beginning

Trend: Decreasing

Killing in a just or unjust war

Wars have existed for accumulation of power or resources and the defense of such attacks. Wars have varying degrees of justification. In some it is easy to tell the just or unjust and in many wars it is difficult to make that determination. One fact is certain they always end in death, injury and devastation. They kill people and blow up things.

Impact and scope: Enormous and continuous. Estimates for all wars of all time vary from 350,000,000 to 1,000,000,000.

Duration: Since the beginning steadily increasing due to more effective weapons

Trend: Decreasing, but uncertain future

Suicide*

This involves the deliberate taking of one's own life, usually because of depression, illness, or hopelessness.

Impact and scope: Large societal impact because there are 20 times as many attempts as successful suicides. So it has a large impact. There are almost 40,000 successful attempts per year in the USA.

Duration: Since the beginning

Trend: Rapidly increasing

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

From the above summary it can be seen that there are five categories of murder of significance as indicated under "impact and scope" that are marked with an asterisk*.

1 - Abortion: 1,000,000/year - USA; World total for all time: 1.4 billion

2 - War: World total for all time: 350,000,000 to 1.0 billion depending on the source

3 - Suicide – 40,000/year

4 - "Accidental" – impaired driving: 20,000/year

5 - Deliberate killing: 15,000/year

It is not difficult to see that abortion is by a large margin the leading cause of death in the USA and the world. To compound that number these were innocent souls at the beginning of their potential. Their chance for that life was taken by others who were given that chance. One of those participating in that termination was the baby's mother. How tragic is that? Now multiply that times 1.4 billion. It is a catastrophe that is impossible to rationalize away considering that the cause was totally preventable.

What are you folks doing down there?

Abortion on this scale defies human comprehension and understanding.

It seems that what makes the whole sordid affair difficult to understand is the use in the sentence of the word "human?" Maybe removing the word might help.

Abortion defies comprehension and understanding. There that's better.

I knew I could resolve this, even at my young age.
THE SUBVERSIVES

The first amendment of the "Constitution" granted freedom of speech, and it has been relinquished by indifference by the masses and intimidation by those who wish to destroy your society and replace it with a perverted vision of their own.

This is all done for personal satisfaction, influence, and financial gain with the willing participation of the media and other disgruntled groups. (Gee, if that sounds like the same motivations for abortion they are) Is it not ironic that the media is supporting a movement that will eventually be the cause of its own demise and loss of its own privileged freedom of speech?

It is they who have the most to lose, those that hold the public microphone granted to them by the Constitution. They have let the torch of freedom be extinguished. Correction, they have participated in extinguishing the torch. What fools they are, and what fools you are for allowing them to be fools.

It does not matter what the subject is, the tactics are always the same and you always fall for them. It is a well-established playbook with tattered pages and a worn binding from being used and reused throughout the ages. The book has no title, but could well be called "The manipulation of Man by Satan, the devil, old scratch."

The familiar scenario proceeds like this:

First, begins the degradation of education, critical thinking, and logic. Second, they set out to destroy long established values, traditions, morals. Third they instigate a controversy that challenges the status quo and defies human decency. Forth, they promote the perverted "vision" of their fringe group or cause. To increase the effect, this movement forms odd bedfellows with any disgruntled group in society with whom they can unite. They are patient. This started in the USA 100 years ago. You are in the last stages and my abortion and the other 1.4 billion are the proof.

The varied causes are not important since the common goal is disrupting, confusing, bankrupting, and overwhelming the system by pure numbers. (Simply put, the Cloward and Piven Philosophy supplemented by Saul Alinski's "Rules for Radicals.")

Next, the attempts to gather public support begin. (This stage is almost always unsuccessful since the proposal is radical and outside normal values and behavior. The public rejects them.) But remember, depravity and evil are exceptionally patient and cunning.

Soon after or simultaneously begins the infiltration at the highest levels of the public and private institutions or organizations that oppose the overthrow. Often the most respected of institutions are prime targets. (Disney, Boy Scouts, Catholic Church, and most of academia of higher learning to name a few of recent vintage) This includes levels of governmental bodies of all types, academia, media, established religions, private organizations, and educational institutions of every type particularly those that influence the young. This strategy is doubly effective since it destroys the previous organization, reduces its ranks when thinking members become disillusioned, and usurps their power, organizational, and financial base. This method has proven unbelievably effective right up to the highest office of your country. The masses continue to patronize, join, and participate in the groups since their detachment makes them unaware that anything has changed. Even if they are aware, they probably wouldn't care.

Next, after claiming "legitimate" power arrives the forcing of public behavior through rules, regulations, and laws passed by the infiltrated bodies now headed by these guerilla warriors. If laws cannot be passed, then the coercion takes place through unelected jurors in the courts. (Roe vs. Wade . . .)

The final stage involves identifying the opposition, their discrediting, and destroying the individuals, businesses, and their leaders through corrupt government operatives, selective application of justice, targeted regulations, intimidation, and vilification. (Cut to the raw facts: fining a baker, jailing him, and destroying his long-time family-owned business and livelihood for refusing to bake a cake that could be baked at any number of other businesses – an outrage twenty years ago – doesn't even raise an eyebrow today – the whole exercise being meant as a "message to others")

Happenings like this were common in the past. They were carried out by the mafia, drug cartels, gangs, and just thugs. Now they are executed by the "respected" and co-opted organizations of our society that dare not be criticized or defied under the banners of tolerance, inclusiveness, and diversity that now carry the full force of government coercion and penalty. (Sound like all the "isms," of dictatorship – they are)

You are in this final stage. You have been asleep for a very long time. Logic be damned. Sorry, logic be darned. It doesn't have the same "ring," to it, does it? But, there are still rules up here, you know. The word "damned" makes everyone nervous up here especially we who may be in "Limbo."

* * * * * * * * * *

Nothing explains this insidious philosophy better than Alinski's "Rules for Radicals." While reading them, if the tactics sound familiar they should be. They are the foundation of every single attack (and there are many) on what has made America great including, and especially, the Pro-life movement.

Read them, understand them, learn to recognize them, and how to resist them when forming your opinions about the vital public issues of your time. Don't go along with the crowd. The crowds are controlled and manipulated lambs on their way to the slaughter. Don't join them. Help save others from my fate.

When reading the rules, don't fall into the trap. They sound like effective ways to make your point and be heard. Everyone wants that. But, remember, the "US Constitution" allows for peaceful coexistence of differing views and an orderly process for change that has worked marvelously for two centuries. The purposes of the groups that espouse these rules wish to destroy that system and supplant it with their own demented, totalitarian system.

The new system never has the safeguards and protections and has no avenue to tolerate differing views and orderly change. It is power hungry and when it obtains it, it never relinquishes it. You see, to have the masses accept the horrors of abortion is a pivotal element to destroy the current system.

After all, if the basic natural and moral tenant of mother/child/family bond can be destroyed, then you will accept anything. If you can attack and destroy the most sacred tenants of society then the rest is a piece of cake.

As your "first lady" said before the first election of a rabid Alinski follower to the presidency with a straight face, "We have to change our history and our traditions." "We have to fundamentally change America." The question from the populace and the free press should have been, "Why would we want to do that?" She told you their plan. You just were not listening. Your ignorant and gullible crowd cheered her statement. Her intention was clear, but you were not listening.

Saul Alinski's "Rules for Radicals"

"Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have." Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. "Have-Nots" must build power from flesh and blood.

"Never go outside the expertise of your people." It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone.

"Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy." Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.

"Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules." If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.

"Ridicule is man's most potent weapon." There is no defense. It's irrational. It's infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.

"A good tactic is one your people enjoy." They'll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They're doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones.

"A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag." Don't become old news.

"Keep the pressure on. Never let up." Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new.

"The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself." Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist.

"The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition." It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign.

" **If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive." Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog.**

(Note: The use, effectiveness, and the power of this rule in promoting the pro-abortion agenda cannot be over-emphasized. The bombing of a clinic or murder of an abortion doctor give enormous power to their cause – not to the cause of pro-life. It gives so much power to the pro-abortion cause, one may wonder if they caused the violence themselves, hmm – just a thought.)

"The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative." Never let the enemy score points because you're caught without a solution to the problem.

"Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (Recent example: The arrest of the pro-life advocate who exposed the selling of baby parts, instead of the arrest of the purpretrators of the illegal sales.)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

It sounds like Saul was such a nice guy – I do hope you know I'm just being sarcastic. (They do allow sarcasim up here) He was not. Maybe I am harming the premise for this entire book by saying this, but, I must. His is one abortion that I would not have lamented, God forgive me. Where is that "Act of Contrition" prayer? So sorry Saul. What the heck, he can't hear me down there. You know he was from Chicago. Now why does that city ring a bell?

I am sorry that I digressed into a general discertation of evil forces. But, unless you study the tatics that are being used, the war against abortion cannot be won. General acceptance of abortion by the populace is a key part of the destruction of morals and vice versa.

Think of it this way. Evil is patient. But, why wait? Evil people today have realized that manipulating the public is so much easier today with modern communications and control of dissemination of information, misinformation and lies. This realization has revealed that they no longer need to nibble away at morals. They can take big bites by appealing to man's gullibility and dark side.

They have learned to start at the top and make enormous progress to destroy goodness and morality by attacking the most sacred, well-established tenants of civil society. If the people accept these attacks with disinterest, they will accept anything less sacred. They have morphed from a bottom up attack to a top down attack – so much more effective and needs so little resources.

Think of the recent attacks on principles and beliefs that have been the accepted and undisputed foundations of all civilization forever: the definition of marriage, having parents reject their maternal and paternal protection of their children, acceptance that a fetus is not a living child, the murder of that child, even after birth, my God, the acceptance of lawlessness, the condoning and funding of an evil califate, the acceptance of funding an evil regeme with hundred of billions of dollars to develop weapons that will destroy your country, the destruction of the family, a man and a woman as the foundation of all of society. Actually this is too much to include in this book. Maybe the next book. They like this one up here, so I might be allowed to write another one. Oh, one more example: "security" at the airport. Abortion is a major piece of the puzzle.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

What is one of the most fundamental and traditional roles of the man of the family? If you are having trouble I'll propose a hint. It is to protect his wife and children from evil actions. The father, mother, and daughter line up for a security check before boarding a transatlantic flight.

While the father watches, his wife and daughter empty their possessions and walk through the metal detector. That's simple enough. Then, a person they have never met, who was hired with questionable vetting proceedures violates them by feeling every part of their bodies and passes them through a machine that reveals what is under their clothes, in detail. If this person wishes they can take his wife or daughter or both into a room, individually and have them disrobe for futher search.

The father observes and does nothing. It has to be done, doesn't it? You know, for security – for your own safety. Mission accomplished, a violation of one of the most basic principles of a civil society, the outrageous violation of the females of the family without a trace of reaction by anyone. The experiment is over, we the government can do anything we want. If the "system" can do that to a man's wife and daughter with his standing there without as much as a peep from him then the system can do anything. Start with the most agreegious violation and the rest will be easy.

So folks you see this is not just about abortion. Abortion was a test, albeit a huge one. But, you failed oh so miserably. Your grade was not even an "F;" it was a zero. Freely embrasing abortion is just one behavior modifcation among a miriad of others that you have been manipulated to accept without even a wimper. 1.4 billion of my brothers and sisters and I died because you were so detached, unconcerned, and ignorant that you didn't give a crap. Excuse me if I don't thank you.
" **THE COWARD OF THE COUNTY"**

Many thanks go to Ann Barnhardt for inspiring in her newsletter, a version of the following allegory. This allegory in no way implies, encourages, or condones the use of violence of any type to make social change. It is just that - an allegory – a  parable, an  analogy, a  metaphor, a  symbol to convey a story. Before continuing, look up the meanings of these words. Burn them into your brain. Is that perfectly clear? To resort to violence of any type only exacerbates the problem for those using the violence and gives fuel to the enemies of your cause to use against you - the opposite of what your original goal was. With that understood, we can continue.

These song lyrics of "The Coward of the County" written by Billy Wheeler and Roger Bowling and sung by Kenny Rogers in 1979 illustrate a strong parallel to the abortion battle of the past forty-four + years. "Pro-lifers" (Tommy in the lyrics) have been good moral people following the "turn the other cheek" philosophy. In many ways, the pro-abortion crowd has used the "turn the other cheek" strategy against "pro-life" to keep its opposition on the defensive. The strategy is a common but effective tool of degeneracy.

Certainly, most would agree that the father's advice in the song was good advice. And good folks have been following that same advice for forty-four years with regard to the abortion controversy. They essentially have been turning the other cheek as described in the advice from the father to the son:

. . . "Walk away from trouble if you can  
Now it don't mean you're weak  
If you turn the other cheek . . .  
Son, you don't have to fight to be a man"

That's where you are today. This travesty has gone on long enough, unabated and uncontrolled, beyond all reason and human decency. Society has become so desensitized to the point of being morally comatose.

Well after 44 years, it is time for pro-life "Tommy" to become a man. There have been enough decades of "rope-a-dope." The rape of Becky, the girl friend (representing the aborted children) is the final straw (The rape = the current out-of-control abortion culture) that caused Tommy to finally realize that something had to be done to stop the outrage.

"I promised you, Dad  
Not to do the things you've done  
I walk away from trouble when I can  
Now please don't think I'm weak  
I didn't turn the other cheek  
Papa, I should hope you understand  
Sometimes you gotta fight  
When you're a man"

The lyrics and link to the entire song are below.

### "The Coward of the County"

Writer(s): Billy Ed Wheeler, Roger Dale Bowling  
Copyright: Universal Music - Careers, Universal Music Corp.

Internet link:

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbYj3tJRSO8&feature=player_embedded

Everyone considered him  
The coward of the county  
He'd never stood one single time  
To prove the county wrong  
His mama named him "Tommy"  
But folks just called him "yellow"  
Something always told me  
They were reading Tommy wrong

♫  
He was only ten years old  
When his daddy died in prison  
I looked after Tommy  
'Cause he was my brother's son  
I still recall the final words  
My brother said to Tommy,

"Son my life is over  
But yours has just begun"

♫  
"Promise me, son  
Not to do the things I've done  
Walk away from trouble if you can  
It won't mean you're weak  
If you turn the other cheek

I hope you're old enough to understand  
Son, you don't have to fight to be a man

♫  
There's someone for everyone  
And Tommy's love was Becky  
In her arms he didn't have  
To prove he was a man  
One day while he was working  
The Gatlin boys came calling  
They took turns at Becky  
There was three of them
Tommy opened up the door  
Saw his Becky crying  
The torn dress, the shattered look  
Was more than he could stand  
He reached above the fireplace  
Took down his daddy's picture  
As his tears fell on his daddy's face  
He heard these words again

♫  
"Promise me, son  
Not to do the things I've done  
Walk away from trouble if you can  
It won't mean you're weak  
If you turn the other cheek

I hope you're old enough to understand  
Son, you don't have to fight to be a man

♫  
The Gatlin boys just laughed at him  
When he walked into the bar room  
One of them got up  
And met him half way cross the floor  
When Tommy turned around they said  
"Hey look, old yellow's leavin'"  
But, you could've heard a pin drop  
When Tommy stopped and locked the door

♫  
Twenty years of crawling  
Was bottled up inside him  
He wasn't holding nothing back  
He let 'em have it all  
When Tommy left the bar room  
Not a Gatlin boy was standing  
He said, "This one's for Becky."  
As he watched the last one fall  
N' I heard him say

♫  
"I promised you, Dad  
Not to do the things you've done  
I walk away from trouble when I can  
Now please don't think I'm weak  
I didn't turn the other cheek

And Papa, I should hope you understand"

♫  
"Sometimes you gotta fight  
When you're a man"

ABORTION IS EASY

It's the future that's not

Throughout your lives you are constantly tested as individuals, as groups, and as mankind, by God and by Satan. Okay, if you will, by forces of good and forces of evil, if you prefer. A common expression is that, "God will never give you a trial that you cannot handle." But, remember if he won't, Satan surely will. You are constantly being tested beyond your abilities. You will always be given trials that you cannot "manage." Be careful adopting catchy sayings that give false security. They let your guard down.

The scourge of abortion is one such monumental trial/test presented to all of mankind. It has been proven to be beyond your abilities to address by a wide margin. The forces of evil have sorely out-flanked the forces of good. You have failed miserably and continue to fail "big time," to use the vernacular. (Evil = 1.4 billion killed vs. Good = millions saved)

But, wait. If you have indeed failed this trial so completely, what can be expected of you in the future when the heavy lifting begins – when the real crosses need to be carried?

You may not be aware of it, but victory over abortion is the easy part, folks!

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Imagine you are a student, and you enter the classroom to complete a mid-term test. You sit at your desk, and the professor indicates to start the test. You turn over your test paper and discover there is only one page and there are only two questions. The instructions indicate that you are to select one. That is the entire test. The test is as follows.

### The University of Mankind

Any town, USA

Semester Final on Abortion

Check one box only:

□ **It is acceptable,** during my pregnancy for my partner and me or anyone else to kill the living, growing baby, fetus, embryo, or whatever you want to call it inside me before it is delivered, or even after it is delivered.

□ **It is not acceptable** during my pregnancy for my partner and me or anyone else to kill the living growing baby, fetus, embryo, or whatever you want to call it inside me before it is delivered, or even after it is delivered.

End of Test

* * * * * * * * * * * *

These are just two rather straight forward, unambiguous questions. Fifty years ago, getting the question correct would have been a "no brainer" – Of course it was not acceptable to kill the baby. Good grief, does anyone even have to think about that? Yet, today it is totally condoned, by law. It is not only acceptable, but it is a wide-spread practice around the globe. It seems you can be convinced of anything. You have gotten it so wrong in one generation, yours. If you cannot get this simple truth right, how will you fare when life gets complicated? The answer is, you will again fail miserably only with much greater consequences on a much larger scale, if that is imaginable.

How will you contend with truly difficult moral and ethical dilemmas if you can't get this simple one correct? Consider these questions that will most certainly confront you in the near future, the very near future. Will you be prepared to "choose" correctly?

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Will it be acceptable to clone a human being, and what will be the limits, if any?

Will it be acceptable to alter human DNA for frivolous purposes or any purpose?

Will the government (be allowed to) create humans bred for specialty uses: soldiers, workers, police, thugs, spies, democrats?

Will it be allowed to alter human DNA to cure disease and disabilities? Who decides?

Will it be acceptable to inter-mingle human DNA with non-human DNA? Don't laugh.

Will there be a resurgence to develop a "master race," and how would it be controlled?

Will it be acceptable to kill the "defective," or the "useless" for convenience or expense?

Should you assemble a complete DNA print of every living human being and store it?

Who should collect the DNA information, archive it, access it, and control it?

Who should be allowed to use the DNA data base and for what purposes?

Should parents be allowed to customize their offspring and custom order their progeny?

How and who will allocate scarce health care resources, by age, ability, sex, wealth . . .?

Will the aged be "encouraged" to leave us when they are no longer "useful?"

Will the "less valuable" members of society be encouraged to donate their organs to

those "more valuable?" Who will define "less valuable" and "more valuable?"

Will it be allowed to grant unlimited life spans to some? Who will decide?

How will scarce resources be allocated to the population? – Fuel, water, food, shelter.

Will the government (be allowed to) track everyone every minute in real time? Who will have access to the data and for what purpose? (They already do this one.)

Who will control what is taught to the children? (They already do this one.)

Will "defectives" (however they are defined) be forcibly sterilized or even killed?

Will the government (be allowed to) dictate your station in life according to your DNA?

Will men's bodies be allowed to be modified to have children? Who will be the parents?

Will it be allowed to transplant human brains? Who will the resulting person be?

Will it be legal to marry your daughter, your mother, and yes, even your pet?

Will the government pre-incarcerate citizens based on their DNA predisposition for "unacceptable behavior" before the behavior even occurs, just as a precaution?"

Will all illicit drugs be made legal? (Progressing on this one)

Who will control the world food supply in the future? Will it be used as a weapon? (It already is.)

Who will control the weather? Who will it benefit? Who will it harm? Will it be used as a weapon?

Most will delude themselves into thinking that these things will not be problems and therefore they don't need to be considered. This is called "normalcy bias," "willful blindness," or burying one's head in the sand." These philosophies are fatal when they are adopted.

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

Abortion is easy.

Technology will make all these things possible, soon, very soon - long before your moral and ethical prowess is developed to deal with them. Some are already in place and advancing rapidly.

The real dangers to a civilized society are that the answers to the difficult questions of the future will be made by default rather than by moral and ethical thought and debate if the relatively simple circumstance of abortion is not addressed.

Eliminating or not eliminating abortion will determine your future.

The profiteers will control the use of this advanced knowledge and technology before you are even aware that it exists. You, the people, will not control it. Principled and virtuous people will not control it. You and your children will be given a place on the list of each of the previous questions, but where on the list will you be – together with the fortunate or the unfortunate – the top of the list or the bottom of the list?

Scruples and morals will be thrown to the side of the road to be washed into the gutter with the next storm and pass out to sea along with the waste of humanity. Probity will be a lost concept as will be your very souls - very much like the scenario you are experiencing with abortion.

This is not just about the death of babies. It is about the precedent, the mold, the mentality being set for more difficult moralistic questions of the future. The dysfunction that good people are showing in dealing with the issue of abortion will give the evil provocateurs incentive to control all these other moral issues. The stakes are enormous.

You cannot even comprehend the world you are creating. Future generations will despise you for your dimwittedness and stupidity. They will spit on your graves for your ignorance, arrogance, and self-indulgence and the irreparable harm you have caused them. Their hatred of your generation will be well-founded and justified. You will have created a "Brave New World" for your progeny that defies the basic tenants of civility and humanity.

There is already this feeling of animosity among young people concerning the abuses of the previous generation. You have left the societal debris and scars in your wake with which they must contend during their lives. Don't you think they have noticed? Oh, yes, they have. And, it will become more evident as time passes.

Roe vs. Wade

The path that you are taking is illustrated by this simple graph. It shows the battle between knowledge and technology and morals and ethics. In the past this was not a battle. Mankind's abilities to control his environment advanced slowly, very slowly.

In past generations, you had ample time to adapt to advances in knowledge and technology. Most times there were centuries to study the positive and negative implications of the advances to control and use them for good. Sometimes the advances were lost before they could be used for evil or for good.

Today knowledge and technology are advanced and distributed at a logarithmic pace. Furthermore, they are available to the masses. Positively, the technology is available to virtually the world instantly to do good works on a large scale. Negatively, it is also available to individuals and the masses for works of evil. Today, technology has the ability to place almost unlimited power in the hands of a few or even one at uncontrollable lighting speed, as they say, before you know what hit you.

The result of this lag between technology and morals creates what I call the "God Complex." The more formidable the control given to man, the more he feels he has the capabilities of "God" over his environment, even over his fellow humans. Man begins to believe he is God and acts like it for his own advancement. This same phenomenon allows him to believe he is invincible and controlled by no one, no law, no society, not even God. The rules don't apply to him, only to others. If fact, he makes the rules up as he goes, but for others. He becomes intoxicated by believing he is God Himself.

". . . And quitting sense call imitating God;  
As Eastern priests in giddy circles run,  
And turn their heads to imitate the sun.  
Go, teach Eternal Wisdom how to rule—  
Then drop into thyself, and be a fool!"

Alexander Pope in the early 1700's said that man has learned about Nature and God's creation by using science; science has given man power but man, intoxicated by this power, thinks that he is "imitating God." Pope uses the word "fool" to show how little he (man) knows in spite of the progress he has made using science. Pope's insights were given at a time when man's power was miniscule complared to today. But, now the "God Complex" is ever so much more prevalent, dangerous, and frightening.

Advancements in every field have made inexpensive abortion available to the world in less than a generation. Everyone can "benefit." You get your abortion; they get rich from the public dole.

"It's the new birth control." "It's available at a clinic near you." "There's no need to worry." "Enjoy yourselves now." You can "fix" the "problem" later."

"Hurry, hurry, come get your abortion, cries the barker at the circus – no waiting in line - in and out in an hour. (no pun intended, this is not a pleasantry)

**If it sounds crass and inhuman, it is**.

The difference is this is not entertainment under the "big top." This is man wielding his newly discovered technology – waving his finger in the face of God – daring Him, if you will - controlling life and death on a previously unimaginable scale.

Shame on you. Shame on you. Shame on you all.

This book is being published in 2015. In a year there will be a presidential election. Search the internet for the top issues of concern. There are about twenty-four listed at a multitude of sites. The only reason you may find "abortion" at the top of any list of concerns (if it is even on the list) is because it starts with the letter "A." Otherwise it will most certainly be at the bottom of the list, outdone by just about every other subject.

Killing babies isn't even on the radar screens of your electorate. People are up in arms (no pun intended again) about 33,000 deaths per year by firearms and not the least bit concerned about the deaths of 1,000,000 babies killed by abortions per year. I know, they aren't babies. I keep forgetting. Auto deaths are good for a "yawn."

To be quite candid, I am not sure why I am even writing this book. It seems that no one will be interested in it, and nobody will download it. I may be wrong about that; many people will download any free book. They just don't read it. If they do read it, they probably won't get this far. If they do get this far, it may instigate another "yawn." Close your mouth, it's not polite.

Even if I charged for the book, what would I do with it? We don't use money up here. I guess I published it because it was so much fun sitting on this cloud for four months. At least the seat is soft and fluffy. Yeah, that's it. Well, at least I may have put a smile on my Father's face. He doesn't have much to smile about these days. I so hope He is not disappointed in me.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

So you see friends, the abortion cataclysm is not the end. It is the beginning, a horrible beginning. You have failed at that beginning under the weight of your own self-interest, greed, indifference, and ignorance. You are seeing the precursor and premonition of what is to come – a harbinger of your future, your physical and moral decline and demise. You have so little time to correct this. Evil forces are writing their rule books for the future as you read this. You must make it clear that this will not stand if you are to survive as a civilized society.

The technology to perform abortions has completely outpaced your ability to morally manage, understand, and control it. If you cannot manage this relatively simple common sense matter, how will there be any hope to govern the complexity of what is to come?

Your future will be determined by default, guided and controlled by a myriad of factors that are largely unknown and uncontrolled by reason or any thoughtful process but rather controlled by sinister forces always hidden in the shadows but with unchallenged authority.

When involved in the influencing of minds regarding abortion, you must remember that there is more at stake than just the lives of babies as monumental as they may be. It is the establishment of a prototype, a pattern of behavior that will spawn even greater, far-reaching, and more complex tragedies. You must wake up and see the larger picture. Your lives before death and your souls after death depend on it.
**ATONE, FORGIVE, AMEND**

All of you in this generation must assume varying degrees of responsibility for what has happened to me and continues to happen to others like me. It does not matter if you believe in a deity or not. If you want to be good and compassionate members of society you must take your lead from "the Act of Contrition." Yes, a prayer. Don't head for the door. It won't hurt. Honestly, just try it.

O, my God, I am heartily sorry for having offended Thee,

and I detest all my sins, because I dread the loss of heaven,

and the pains of hell, but most of all because they offend Thee, my God,

Who are all good and deserving of all my love.

I firmly resolve, with the help of Thy grace,

to confess my sins, to do penance, and amend my life. Amen.

* * * * * * * * * * *

There, I told you it would't hurt. Did it? I am so sorry, if you do not believe in a higher being, you don't get to skate on this one, not if you want to remain part of the human race. At least atone for your transgression against your fellow humans. Either way, be sorry.

This one's for you. I would raise my glass, but I don't have one. I don't even have an arm to raise it if I did.

O, my brothers and sisters, I am heartily sorry for having offended you,

and I detest all my transgressions against you, because I dread the loss of your good will, my place in the human race,

and the pains of guilt, but most of all because my actions harmed you, my fellow humans,

Who are deserving of all my love and my respect.

I firmly resolve, with the help of your forgiveness,

to acknoldge my transgressions, to do penance, and amend my life.

Atone and be forgiven, even forgiven by yourself. These prayers, pledges, promises or whatever you want to call them will help clear your conscience for participating in this horrible act or being complicit by indifference in the past. It will not return the lives that were denied to we who were helpless, but at least it will show some degree of sorrow and promise that the behavior will not continue in the future. It would not be harmful to also attempt to convince others to make the same pledge. What's the expression? It won't kill you. Oh, I shouldn't use that word. It would send chills up my spine, if I had one.

* * * * * * * * * * *

If this tale of my short life,

has not soften your heart,

then quite possibly, my dear friend

you don't have one.

I guess I should move on, but I tried.

Seven of these unelected **men** determined the unfortunate fate of 50 million babies and and the lives of as many couples and counting – 150 million humans in total – no one thinks of the "collateral damage" done to the 100 million in the years after, you know the two"parents."

And, they look just like your grandpas.

They all had their "talk" with Jesus quite a while ago.

You should remember their names and pray for their souls.

"Forgive them Father for they know not what they do."

I'm not sure if they knew what they did.

But, it sounds forgiving.

I have trouble having sympathy for them.

But, then again I have a unique perspective on the matter.

* * * * * * * * * * *

The Majority vote:

Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Lewis F. Powell Jr., Thurgood Marshall

("Bad boys, bad boys, whacha gonna do when they come for you?" Remember their names.)

Concurring:

Warren Burger, William Orville Douglas, Potter Stewart

(More bad boys - Remember their names, too)

Dissenting:

William H. Rehnquist, Byron White

(The Good boys - bless their hearts and remember them as well, but fondly)

LET'S PRAY TOGETHER

"Oh, my, another prayer?"

"What is it with this character?"

Now, I am sorry I bought this book.

That's right, it was free. Never mind.

mcrprincess911

Hail Mary, full of grace.  
Our Lord is with thee.  
Blessed art thou among women,  
**and blessed is the fruit of thy womb,  
Jesus.**  
Holy Mary, Mother of God,  
pray for us sinners,  
now and at the hour of our death.  
Amen.

* * * * * * * * * *

It is notable that the words "fetus," "embryo," and "mass of cells"

don't appear in the prayer when describing the contents of Mother Mary's womb.

What is God's message in this simple prayer? Hmm.

Let's see if you can work this out, "blessed" – "fruit" – "womb" – "Jesus"

I'll be darned, if it doesn't sound like a baby, again.

("I'll be damned" makes "people" up here cringe. I know it makes me nervous.)

What if Mary aborted Jesus?

It is sad, but there are many that would not care.

They may care, soon.

In the past 40 years there have been 1.4 billion virtual headstones with no names, no birth dates – no dates of death. That's enough graves to circle the globe twice around the equator – all caused by behavior that is totally avoidable with just a modicum of self control.

I know Your Holiness, emeritus, I know.

This too will pass.

Where are you when you are needed the most, Holy Father?

Why did you leave us? I can only speculate.

Are you being held prisoner at Castel Gondolfo?

(Note: There is a school of thought that Benedict is still the pope, not Francis.

After all, Benedict did "leave" under, shall we say, the most "unorthodox" of circumstances

And Francis' questionable leadership has raised the eyebrows of senior clergy, scholars, and laity alike

I have asked to talk to God about this, but the line is very long. Many want to know.

That will have to be the subject another book. Stay tuned.

Apparently there is evil everywhere. Who can be trusted? Apparently, only the Lord.)

* * * * * * * * * * * *
ABORTION – A TREATISE AND TIMELINE

As an adjunct to the previous presentation, the following discourse is a rather concise four-part piece outlining a brief history of abortion in America with an emphasis on how the subject is addressed in and relates to the Constitution. Readers may find it useful in tracing how this contorted abomination of abortion was initiated, infected our society, and obtained a life of its own. (Grotesque correlation intended)

It was prepared as a part of the Glenn Beck program and presented in printed and narrated form by him. Glenn Beck is often maligned for his strong conservative views. However, this work appears to present an unbiased, accurate, and equitable description and timeline of a subject that is often discussed with distortions of facts and actual happenings and laced with inaccuracies pursuant to a devious agenda. A reference to the original presentation can be found at the end of the document. Please share it with others.

Abortion Part I:

The Founders' Views in 2015:

Chairperson of the Democratic National Committee, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, recited a common refrain of the pro-abortion activists: "We do not support rolling back the protection that the constitutional right to make your own reproductive choices established in Roe vs. Wade has given to women." It should be noted that the United States Constitution actually says nothing about abortion specifically. And while it is true that the Supreme Court ruled in favor of legalized abortion in 1973, the high court cannot write constitutional amendments, meaning women's reproductive rights are still not mentioned in the Constitution.

However, it would seem that the unborn babies would qualify as our posterity, and thus, deserve a chance for life and liberty. While there is no specific language in the Constitution regarding abortion, the Founders did leave behind their beliefs on the topic. For that insight, we turn to author and historian David Barton. After America separated from Great Britain and the Founding Fathers made their own brand-new and unique government, they still preserved and protected the legal position against abortion.

This fact is made clear by founding father James Wilson. James Wilson was one of only six Founders who signed both the declaration and the Constitution. He was the second most active member at the Constitutional Convention, and he was placed as an original justice on the US Supreme Court by President George Washington. Wilson began America's first organized legal training, and he authored our first legal textbook for students in which he told law students, quote, with consistency, beautiful, and undeviating, human life, from its commencement to its close, is protected by the common law.

In the contemplations of law, life begins when the infant is first able to stir in the womb by the law that life is protected, end quote. American law was clear. As soon as it was known that there was life in the womb, at that point, that life was protected by law for the purpose of government was to protect all unalienable rights, including that of life. In the Founders' day, they recognized that there was a right to life in the womb, so soon as James Wilson said, quote, the infant is first able to stir. That is, when movement can be felt inside and, thus, they knew for sure that there was indeed life within. But with today's technology, it is now possible to know with a certainty that life is within the womb for only a few days after conception.

Regardless, whenever it is known that life was within, according to the documents penned by our Founding Fathers, at that point, unborn life was to be protected under the law. In the late 1700s, America's attitude on life stood out compared to the rest of the world. Because our Founders believed the things that they did about God and nature, there was a difference between the law here and elsewhere around the world. Across much of secular Europe, it was wrongly believed that parents — not God — gave life to their children. So under the law of those countries, parents had the right to take their child's life. After all, they believed they had given it. But Americans knew that the life of a child came not from parents, but from God. Parents, therefore, had no right to deprive an unborn child of its life.

A signer of the declaration, John Witherspoon acknowledged, "Some nations have given parents the power of life and death over their children. But here in America, we have denied the power of life and death to parents." It may well be that America's Founding Fathers didn't specifically address the abortion issue because they couldn't conceive of a people that would destroy the lives of 55 million unborn babies in a 43-year period of time.

Abortion Part II:

Margaret Sanger - the year, 1957

Mike Wallace interviewed 78-year-old Margaret Sanger, the founder of what eventually became Planned Parenthood, a group that now receives nearly half a billion dollars a year in taxpayer money (as of the date of this publication) to function as America's largest abortion provider. Near the beginning of the interview, Wallace sought to determine her motives for birth control. Even a young Mike Wallace seemed shocked by some of what he heard from Margaret Sanger that day, including her belief that "the greatest sin in the world is bringing children into the world that have disease from their parents, that have no chance in the world to be a human being practically, delinquents, prisoners, all sorts of things, just marked when they're born."

Sadly, and strangely, Wallace never asked Margaret Sanger about the most controversial aspects of her character — her association with eugenics, and the ample evidence of her racism. In her autobiography, Margaret Sanger wrote about a speech she gave in 1926 at a Ku Klux Klan rally in Silver Lake, New Jersey. The Planned Parenthood founder was particularly proud about the fact that afterward, she was invited by 12 other Klan chapters to speak at their events. Because of Margaret Sanger's vision, there are, in fact, disproportionately fewer blacks in America than any other race. Those of a liberal leaning mind who claim to deplore racism and vigorously support Planned Parenthood should do a little research of Mrs. Sanger, her thinking and the purpose of the organization. Mrs. Sanger was accomplished and a trail blazer. Even though her emphasis was on birth control, sterilization of "defectives" to improve the stock of the human, race her work was instrumental to the rise of the abortion business monster.

Since 1973, legal abortion has killed more African-Americans than AIDS, cancer, diabetes, heart disease and violent crime combined. Every week, more blacks die in American abortion clinics than were killed in the entire Vietnam War. African-American Pastor Clenard Childress has said, "The most dangerous place for an African-American to be is in the womb of their African-American mother." In Sanger's 1922 book, Women, Mortality, and Birth Control, she wrote, "We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social service backgrounds and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don't want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."

In her magazine, Birth Control Review, Sanger wrote, "Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race." If it sounds familiar, it should. It's essentially the same policy advocated and carried out by Germany's Nazi leader Adolf Hitler, whose sterilization policy Sanger openly praised. Most people associate eugenics with Hitler and the Nazis. And while the Nazis may have perfected the movement, they did not start it. It began in England and spread to the United States very early in the 20th century. Margaret Sanger was, in fact, a racist and eugenicist who advocated for the, "extermination of the Negro population."

Margaret Sanger

1879 - 1966

Founder of Planned Parenthood

"The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."

(An interesting quote. Apparently her family was not of the same opinion. Pity)

(Photo and quote added by author)

Abortion Part III:

Roe v. Wade In 1973

The Supreme Court legalized abortion, ruling that it was a private matter between a mother and her doctor within the first three months of pregnancy. The 7-2 ruling overturned laws in Texas, Georgia and 17 other states, stating the government had no right to enter into the now protected decision. The court ruled that during the second three months of pregnancy, the state could regulate abortion procedures, but only to ensure the safety of the mother. During the last three months of pregnancy, state laws would prevail.

Unwittingly, the Supreme Court also sentenced 55 million unborn babies to death over the next 42 years, including well over 14 million African-American children. The ruling overturned centuries of laws prohibiting taking the lives of the unborn. How was this monumental change accomplished? How could a nation that promised the blessings of life and liberty to its posterity, a nation that so treasured its children become capable of allowing millions of its posterity to be wiped out before birth?

Lies and spin from the progressive left

Pro-abortion activists became something everyone could love — pro-choice. Who could possibly be against choice in America? It wasn't about aborting an unborn baby anymore, but a woman's right to choose what she wanted to do with her body. In order to nullify the objection over the human being growing inside the womb, they also began a campaign to dehumanize the human fetus by referring to it as tissue or cells.

If the spin wasn't enough, there were also lies. One of the most prominent pro-abortion activists was renowned abortionist — and cofounder of NARAL — Bernard Nathanson. Nathanson and his allies lied relentlessly and spectacularly about the number of women who had died each year from abortions. He claimed that between 5,000 and 10,000 women died each year from illegal abortions. The actual number in 1972, the year before Roe v. Wade, was 39. Nathanson later confessed he had lied about the numbers, knowing full well the figures were totally false. He stated his overriding concern was to eliminate the laws against abortion and "anything within reason that had to be done was permissible."

Bernard Nathanson had a change of heart one year after the nation's abortion laws were overturned in 1973. By 1980, he had given up the abortion industry entirely and eventually became active in the pro-life movement, later converting from Atheism to Christianity. But the damage had been done.

In 1970, the woman at the heart of Roe v. Wade

Norma McCorvey, a young woman who lived in Texas — became pregnant with her third child. She wanted an abortion, but they were illegal in Texas. So Jane Roe, as she would come to be called in court, found two young lawyers to challenge the laws. They lost their initially court battles, but appealed all the way to the United States Supreme Court. And in 1973, the Supreme Court ruled 7-2 in Roe's favor, negating the abortion laws in 46 states. Jane Roe, never had the abortion, giving her baby up for adoption instead. Norma McCorvey came to deeply regret her decision and her part in overturning abortion laws. For decades since, she has been a committed warrior in the pro-life movement. It's a bittersweet irony that two of the people most responsible for legalizing abortion in America became adamantly and actively pro-life.

Abortion Part IV:

Today's Fight in the 43 years since abortion became legal:

Fifty-five million babies have been destroyed and hundreds of years of laws and beliefs erased from much of society. The battle to change what we know about biology continues as the pro-life movement seeks to stop the slaughter. Pro-abortion activists control the debate today in America. So much so that Planned Parenthood — the organization providing the vast majority of abortions in America today — maintains its federal funding after secret videos exposed it illegally selling body parts from aborted babies. If this weren't such a deadly, serious issue, it would be almost comical listening to people like former DNC Chairperson Debbie Wasserman Schultz avoid referring to her own children as human before they were born.

President Obama, then Illinois State Senator Obama, once awkwardly and painstakingly discussed a bill about whether a child born alive during a failed abortion should receive medical treatment (a bill that Barack Obama opposed). As I understand it, this puts the burden on the attending physician, who has determined since they were performing this procedure, that, in fact, this is a nonviable fetus. That . . . if that fetus or child — however, whatever way you want to describe it — is now outside of the mother's womb, and the doctor continues to think that it's nonviable, but there's, let's say movement or some indication that, in fact, they're not just coming out limp and dead, that, in fact, they would then have to call a second physician to monitor and check off and make sure that this is not a live child that could be saved.

Hillary Clinton, the woman many consider to be the odds-on favorite to become the next president of the United States, believes that in order to bring about the kind of abortion-on-demand world she envisions, "deep-seated cultural codes and religious beliefs have to be changed." Additionally, she believes that "the unborn person doesn't have constitutional rights." The United States extends rights to illegal aliens, terrorists tried on our soil and mass murderers. How is it possible that an unborn person, as she admitted the fetus was and is, doesn't have constitutional rights? Rights have been granted to the unborn — our posterity — from the very beginning of the Constitution in the preamble. Conservatives want the government involved where it should be involved — protecting life.

Then Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz summed it up this way: I think the first obligation of everyone in public office is to protect life. Life is foundational. In fact, as you look at the Declaration, that ordering of unalienable rights — life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness — I think is a very deliberate ordering. Without life, there is no liberty. And without liberty, there is no pursuit of happiness. That each builds upon the other." The left speaks of the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision as if it had been carved into tablets on a mountaintop. They once spoke the same way about the 1883 Supreme Court decision allowing individuals and corporations to discriminate against blacks. It's time for Americans to realize that Supreme Court decisions are not — and should not be — the final and only word in this land.

The audio version of this illuminating, four-part series on abortion can be found at the following site narrated by Glenn Beck.

**Source:**

 http://www.glennbeck.com/2016/05/16/abortion-the-four-part-series//?utm_source=articles&utm_medium=glenn-recommends&utm_campaign=glenn-recommends?utm_source=glennbeck&utm_medium=contentcopy_link

* * * * * * * * * * * *
About Judgment and Tolerance

If you search for quotations describing "Judging others," you will find no shortage of opinions. Everyone has one. The quotations range from "judging is bad," "judging is good," and "only God can judge," and everything in between. But, it soon becomes apparent that the quotes that condemn judging others are in the majority by a substantial measure.

The consensus is that we should not judge others, because we will be judged ourselves. This is directly from Christ himself, isn't it? How can you construct a cogent argument against that? End of discussion. This is established truth. No disrespect, sir, "But sit down and shut up." This is the insidious ploy – using the doctrines of faith against good people to have them acquiesce to, accept, tolerate, and eventually participate in evil.

The evil tactic: Most today are exposed to a flood of information. Just about everyone carries in his pocket the equivalent of a miracle – the smart phone. In a short time, its moniker has become a gross misnomer. It is not a phone. It provides access, even for the least among us, to the world of knowledge like no human society has ever had. For little money, it presents in real, continuous time, constantly updated, in full color, the accumulated knowledge of humanity. Yet, despite this marvel of technology, most are more ignorant, gullible, and lazy than any generation before ours. This generation is devoid of any of the tools necessary to process this mountain of information and produce logical, discerning, and independent thought.

The acceptance and even embracing of abortion is, in large part due to this flood of information and, yes, misinformation. Rather than use this tool as the marvel that it is, our secular society allows hidden and nefarious forces to manipulate and abuse its potential for their own purposes. This wonder is used by most for trivia and self-indulgence, wasting its true potential to improve the lot of mankind. What a pity this phenomenon is.

What does this have to do with "judgment" and "tolerance" of evil and abortion? The quote "Judge Not, Lest Ye Be Judged" is incomplete. Capitalizing on society's almost non-existent attention span, the quotation has purposely been presented in its incomplete form to obfuscate its true meaning. (to channel the good into accepting evil)

Apparently, we are supposed to take this abridged directive to mean:

No man has the right to judge any other man for any purpose, any behavior, at any time, for any reason. One could also extend that contention to mean that without a perceived transgression, there can therefore be no punishment. "Judgment is God's domain, not man's." It sounds authoritative, impressive, and unassailable. To challenge, believe or state otherwise is, well, blasphemy.

But, is that what Jesus meant?

_We owe it to the wisdom of Dr. Richard Fitzgibbons of the Institute for Marital Healing (_<http://www.maritalhealing.com/> _) for enlightening us. He states, "_ When Jesus spoke these words on the slopes surrounding the Sea of Galilee, He wasn't saying never to judge. He simply warned about doing it the wrong way—by telling us how to make judgments the right way."

In the verses that follow, Jesus makes it clear what his intent was: Do not judge your fellow man hypocritically. Judge him with a just and informed mind and be free of and rid yourselves of the same transgression.

Look all around for proof of what Jesus meant. Does God judge man on Earth while man is alive? Obviously, he does not. What of drug lords, vicious dictators, Hitler, and Stalin? Men on Earth judged and punished these miscreants, not God. God gave these reprobates free will, and they used that free will to perform unimaginable harm to mankind without God intervention.

Despite his dearth of intercession for their despicable actions during their time on Earth, God certainly did judge them when they left this Earth. But, if man did not judge man and punish him on Earth, there would be continuous chaos and anarchy and society could not function even for the most basic human needs. There would be no humanity.

Why do we call the presiding officer over legal disputes in a court room a "Judge?" Could it be that he "judges?" What do the jurors do? Judge! What do employment officers, admissions personnel do every day? They judge each applicant for his or her worthiness. Every day from the moment we rise until we sleep, we judge everyone, every action, every thing. We could not function in life without being judgmental and then acting on those judgments.

We could not pick a spouse, a house, a job, a best friend, a dress, a car, a counselor, a place to dine, a religion, an occupation, a leader, or a doctor. And, yes we could not take a moral stand on what we know is right and what we know is wrong. There would be no standards by which to guide our behavior, and advancement of society would halt. We could not function. Society would very soon self-destruct. Very much like where we are today.

We not only make judgments thousands of times a day, yes regarding other persons too, but we guide our actions based on those evaluations. And, yet, we are told, "Judge not." Baloney! If you believe you are not judgmental in every thing you do including your dealings with others then you are sorely delusional. Why, you are judging me right this moment by what I have written and you have never met me. You may even hate me because of what I am saying and your judgment of me. N'est-ce pa? Then again, you might love me. That would be a nice judgment. Hm. I think I am beginning to like this judgment thing.

We are told to "Judge not" by those who wish us to accept and join their lascivious and immoral life styles and actions. You must not fall into the "Judge Not / Tolerance / Inclusiveness Trap." "Are you to give up your religious, moral, and civic principles because others wish to have none and wish you to join their ranks so they can declare, "See everyone is doing it?" Certainly you do not if you wish to declare yourself a part of the community of civil society and humanity.

We can agree. Everyone loves freedom. But, freedom has a price, a responsibility. To coin a common phrase, Freedom is not free. Freedom cannot exist in a vacuum. It is fragile. It is rare and once it is lost, it seldom resurfaces without Herculean effort and just the right conditions. That is why it is so lacking in the world. Absolute freedom with regard to humans who have been endowed with free will cannot exist. That has been illustrated by millennia of history.

For freedom to exist and flourish it must be nurtured in a milieu of good people self-controlling, self-disciplining, and self-regulating themselves with common acceptable norms, standards, and morals based on their compassion and concern for their fellow humans – their love of others. Without this foundation, freedom will not flourish or survive.

A huge portion of humanity believes God created man in his image and endowed him with free will. Man promptly used that will to defy his Maker. Since that moment and until today man has been immersed in a perpetual battle to choose between right and wrong, good and evil. After the committing of that original sin, man has been tortured and tempted by this choice. (There's that word again)

During the short span of this generation, Satan, the Devil, old scratch has increased his power exponentially by adding "good people" to his arsenal using a devious and effective technique. He has recruited the assistance of a willing media and social networking to accomplish his goal. He evidently has technological prowess and is rather computer savvy and does not hesitate to use that knowledge. The insidiousness of the ploy is particularly treacherous and cunning. It utilizes the very dogma that good people are encouraged to follow in their teachings. But, it is used to promote their participation in evil acts without their awareness. He is very clever.

Most religions advocate and advise, actually require, its members to be benevolent, kind, generous, humble, tolerant and even divest themselves of worldly goods to help those less fortunate.

The ploy which is being peddled is the advocating, even requiring of good people to be "tolerant"– tolerant of other's actions, tolerant of their beliefs.

It sounds good, "What is wrong with that?"

The concept is in common usage everywhere and extended to just about every person and thought. It is particularly aggressively taught in the hallow halls of religious institutions as a dogma to be followed to be a member in good standing of the congregation. But, this seems to be a deviation from the foundation of the principles of the various faiths.

" **What, abandon "tolerance?" Why, that would mean to embrace, "intolerance" – an "evil" word and an even worse behavior practiced by evil people**

" **Shame on you."**

" **I might have to stop reading this book."**

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Listen to what a man more learned than you or I said 86 year ago.

Quoting from the late Venerable Fulton J. Sheen in his treatise

"1A Plea for Intolerance"

 http://www.materecclesiae.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Plea-for-Intolerance-3.pdf

Written in 1931

" **America it is said, is suffering from intolerance – it is not. It is suffering from tolerance. Tolerance of right and wrong, truth and error, virtue and evil, Christ and chaos. Our country is not nearly so overrun with the bigoted as it is overrun with the broadminded."**

He continues:

" **The refusal to take sides on great moral issues is itself a decision. It is a silent acquiescence to evil. The tragedy of our time is that those who still believe in honesty lack fire and conviction, while those who believe in dishonesty are full of passionate conviction."**

Unacceptable or harmful behavior by a few, causes the masses to impose mandatory restrictions on those freedoms. The transgressions are minor at first, yet they almost always escalate to more grievous improprieties. These minor offenses intensify and encourage others to participate, promulgating more and harsher limitations on freedom. Eventually, the deviations become crimes, yet further eroding freedoms and imposing substantial penalties. In extreme cases when immoral action assumes the role of "acceptable" behavior and becomes widespread, moral society dissolves, actually disintegrates is a more accurate description. This is where we are my friends with the issue of abortion. The tsunami has hit, everyone is doing it so it must be right.

And, thus we have come full circle to the question of abortion. We are asked, no told, that we must accept what we know is murder for essentially selfish and trivial purposes for the sake of being tolerant, being inclusive, being compassionate. We are told to abandon the foundational principle since the beginning of time of a mother's instinct to love and protect her progeny at the risk of her own life if necessary for a career or even worse.

We have become so ignorant of the truth that we cannot comprehend the principle understood even by the lowest of the beasts of the Earth. We are being told that marriage is not marriage. We are being told that a man is not a man and a woman is not a woman. It's only a vacillating state of mind. Applications for college and employment no longer ask "male or female." They ask "sex assigned at birth." Your daughter must pee next to a person who might be a man if he/she/it chooses to be so today. Black is White. All lives don't matter, just some. Up is down. Water is not wet. Poop doesn't stink. Truth is whatever you want it to be, today. Maybe it is something else tomorrow, or later on today. Jesus was no more than a homeless hippy with poor hygiene. Smoking cigarettes is bad. Smoking pot is good. The list is endless.

Man first crawled, then he walked on solid ground, he then was forced to walk on eggs, and now he walks on quicksand. There is no escape from the quagmire. There is no pleasing the monster of political correctness. It is a black hole that consumes everything but itself. You enter but you don't exit. It is the "Roach Motel."

The point is that in the past many of these statements were "opinions" closely held by a few in their private circles. They were essentially left to their life styles if those opinions were what they believed. Today, they are "truths" held by large numbers of people in power or influential to power.

They are not content in their beliefs and living their lifestyles any longer. They demand that their beliefs be memorialized in law and imposed on the public at risk of destruction, financial ruin, or incarceration. Freedom is for them. Servitude is for the opposition. The inmates are running the asylum. Gee, it sounds a little like ISIS. Conform, submit, and believe or be destroyed. "Where have you gone, Joe DiMaggio?"

Each person today must decide for him or her or it self if he or she or it is going to take part in this insanity or follow the foundations of real truth and what they know is indisputably righteous.

One clear and simple area in which this can be manifest is the vocal opposition to abortion. This is the line in the sand. No, Mr. Obama, a real line in the sand. Yes, it is simple, yet there is no subject more monumental. The forces of evil know if they can win this battle, and it is certain it is being won, then every other immoral act to destroy western civilization will be so easy.

Reread the recommendations in this book. Contact a nearby pro-life group and participate in their activities and support them. Direct them to this book and the concept of leaving abortion legal but rather concentrating on changing the minds and souls of the masses that what we are doing is destroying mankind.

Once the souls of mankind are awakened to this horror, abortion will disappear on its own – no marches, no debates, no arguments, just shame for placing oneself in such a vulnerable situation and shame for choosing such an abhorrent "solution."

Reduction and disappearance of an objectionable and harmful practice can happened and is continuing to happen with cigarette smoking. It will happen with the reduction and eventual elimination of abortion. Be strong, be persistent, be patient. It will not happen on its own. But, it will happen. It depends on you, and you, and you.

" **The man who refuses to judge, who neither agrees nor disagrees, who declares that there are no absolutes and believes that he escapes responsibility, is the man responsible for all the blood that is now spilled in the world. Reality is an absolute, existence is an absolute, a speck of dust is an absolute and so is a human life."**

Ayn Rand

"Atlas Shrugged"

Could it be that Ayn is referring the group so admired and sought after today by the "elite" ruling class?

the thoughtful, the undecided, the independents, the middle, the masses -

George S. Patton's contemptuous "wet noodle society."

**A NOTE FROM THE AUTHOR**

I extend my sincerest apologies for the somewhat unorthodox and sometimes brutal frankness and yes, even sarcasm and irreverence of this work that I am sure has raised the ire of some. But, then I thought, I have fallen into the trap set by the pro-abortion movement.

Why should I have to apologize to the faceless millions for trying to save the lives of innocent babies when they have not apologized for killing them.

I realize the presentation has most certainly upset the sensibilities of some people, actually many people, individuals who would otherwise call me friend, and I them.

However, dear readers, please put away your knives of hostility, outrage, and anger for just one moment. Resist the knee-jerk reaction of enmity, animosity, and hatred that have been inbred in us. I know it is difficult. No one knows better than I - a humble member of the family of man, subject to the same human imperfections and frailties as we all are.

I am a little sarcastic, but, they are honest and thoughtful opinions from an old man watching the world around me burn and much too tired to put out the fire. What is a little sarcasm and irreverence when many good people around me are feeding the flames and roasting marshmallows on an inferno feed by the bodies of babies? I mourn what I, we, have left the next generation. Have we no decency left?

I am not the enemy, although there are enemies- many enemies – our common enemies – cowards lurking in the shadows, and briefly appearing to spew lies, deceit, deception, and then returning into obscurity as the conflict they purposely instigated rages. They feast on the goodness and compassion of the unsuspecting. All the while, they use the values and principles of good people as cogent weapons against them.

However, a subject such as this cannot be addressed by dancing around it, walking on egg shells, and allowing oneself to be pushed from one side of the argument to the other. Thoughtful, good people will come to the correct conclusion if they follow their consciences and their heart about what is right.

Those who are disturbed about what is happening such as I and so many others, have been demonized, discounted, vilified, and told what is the proper language and decorum that can used and displayed while they themselves participate in the most barbaric practices and verbal attacks on a scale that has been unprecedented in human history. The insidious method they use is to disparage and accuse their opposition of the evil that they themselves perpetrate to gain public acceptance of their iniquitous campaign.

In an astonishing display of gentleness and restraint in the face of a vile attack, the head of the Catholic Church in Belgium, Archbishop Andre-Joseph Leonard, remained calmly seated with eyes closed in prayer as four topless "women" attacked him with shouts, obscenities, and curses and doused him with water. The "creature" behind him is the apparition of the Devil himself, herself – ah, the liberated modern woman, the mother of the next generation. Sorry, I forgot, the baby will never see the light of day. "You have come a long way, baby."

In this photo it is startling and frightening to see the image that appeared when enlarged. The smaller photo seems to show a tortured being screaming with an open mouth. The enlarged photo seems to show a smaller demonic visage with an evil smile – just an optical illusion or a presence of the devil? Either way, it is a frightening apparition in line with the reaction of the left to any attempt of good people to practice their religious beliefs held for millennia regarding any viewpoint that does not agree with theirs.

So much for tolerance by the left – a dictum always demanded but never granted.

I pray that this short story of "Split the Baby?" has invoked some thought for this most important subject of our generation, quite possibly of all time. This is a topic which too few of us have actually given much serious thought, despite its enormous importance. Too often positions of advocacy or opposition are adopted without rational thought and based on politics, preconceived notions, misconceptions, and other irrelevant factors.

By not giving it our serious attention, we have allowed this immoral tragedy of biblical proportions to be perpetrated by a few among us who promote this behavior for their own advancement. Through indifference, we have allowed this to take place, and we have willingly participated and condoned the travesty. Please give this issue serious thought and act according to your conscience. I sincerely hope that most will make the right decision. Your very soul and the survival of the next generation may depend on your conclusion and more importantly your actions.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

If there is anything we can learn from the past, it is that the abortion war cannot be won in the political arena. Politicians have been proven to be spineless and have little interest in upsetting the status quo. Even if they were "motivated," they have been shown, without a doubt, to be unreliable and untrustworthy, to be blunt, liars of the highest order, selling their souls to the highest bidder. The mere fact that someone runs for office today is proof that they are unworthy of our trust. It is memorialized in the old joke: "How can you tell if a politician is lying?" "His mouth is moving." But, unfortunately it is not much of a joke. In fact, it is not amusing at all, is it?

The only chance for major progress to take place is to expand and support the substantial pro-life, grass-roots effort and network of hundreds of groups and millions of good individuals that already exist and assist them to wake up the public.

You ask, "What can I do?" Join the groups, volunteer and participate. We each have strengths and talents. Identify yours, and use them to further the cause of good. You must do this. No one else can do it for you. I have attempted to use the one "talent" that I have discovered, authorship, as my contribution to the cause of good. You must have similar, more sophisticated talents in other fields. Use them, volunteer them, and put them to constructive use. You cannot rely on others to do this task. The perpetrators of this holocaust have proven to be prevaricators and opportunist, interested only in their own advancement. They are clever, well-organized, and cunning. To win, pro-life must be cleverer, better-organized, and more cunning. They have sold their souls. Don't sell yours by inaction and complacency or even complicity.

* * * * * * * * * * *

Last night while finishing writing, I received an e-mail from someone I love very much to thank me for a kindness. She expressed excitement about reading this book. I told her it may be a difficult and challenging read. Nonetheless, she replied that despite the images it might present, she was still very much enthused about reading it. I was so pleased – a young person interested in improving the world and her future – how marvelous.

It made me think. Whether a few, many, or a great many read this book, what if just one woman changed her mind about aborting her baby, just one? There would be a child who would not have existed in the world who could love her and who could live her life and produce the lives of her children and they their children.

That would quite possibly be the most significant accomplishment of my life -

the saving of just one innocent life and all those descendants that may have otherwise never been born. There aren't too many people who will be able to claim that.

sourcefed.com

That achievement can be yours as well – if we could all just save one.

Imagine that.

If you had an epiphany that changed your mind and saved your baby,

write an anonymous review and shout it to the world.

God and your baby will love you for it.

Good people must wake up and act

before there remains no reason to wake and no time to act.

I apologize to my readers for being so crude and disrespectful at times.

I am just a tired old man who can no longer acquiesce

to accept the unacceptable

to believe the unbelievable

to be tolerant of evil and be intolerant of good

to believing the emperor has clothes when he has none

believing that an apple is a pig

believing that excrement doesn't stink

to reject good and embrace evil

being told that abortion isn't murder

to being coerced into following the mob into hell.

I cannot do it any longer, I refuse.

I know what I see, and I know what I hear

and

What I am told is not what I hear

And it is not what I see.

What I am being told and see is evil.

" **I'm mad as hell and I am not going to take it any more."**

You get mad as hell and don't take it any more.

Get off your collective butts and do something!

For Christ's sake.

I am not taking God's name in vain

I am imploring Him.

Who else is there left to implore?

* * * * * * * * * * * *

In expressing my views writing this book so candidly and passionately, I fear that I may have either put a smile on God's face and been granted a ticket to heaven to meet my dear wife, or I have unleashed God's wrath and paved my way to hell.

I can only pray that it is the former and not the latter.

I need only to answer to Him, and not to my fellow man.

For you see it is only He who will decide my fate.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Please refer this book to everyone you know and those you don't.

Regardless of your gender, your age, your spiritual status, and beliefs, any compassionate, thinking, moral person has to see that there is something wrong with aborting one sixth of the world population in 40 years without a bit of conscience about the physical impact, the expenditure of scarce medical resources, and the enormous collateral emotional damage to the perpetrators, participants, those around them, and the society in general. Society must step back, take a long, deep breath and think about the consequences of our actions. When the debate about the water boarding of a handful of enemy combatants was raging, the cry was "that's not who we are as Americans."

### In light of the abortion tragedy,

### the question is,

### "Indeed, who are we America?

### The answer is one which none of you,

### your ancestors, your descendants, nor

### your Maker would be proud.

### You know it's true.

The internet link for this book is as follows. Send the link to those you care about.

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/576768

If you are pro-abortion, undecided, unconcerned or ambivalent about this issue, I implore you to watch this short video. It consists of a few graphic illustrations and some narrative. If you are going to be an advocate of a certain position, then find out what you are advocating.

### Don't deceive yourselves. Educate yourselves.

http://www.abortionprocedures.com/

Thanks, Lila Rose and "Live Action."

APPENDIX

clipartsheep.com

### The Tree of life

It seems to have a strong resemblance to a baby in a mother's womb, doesn't it?

Life – baby – womb

Hmm, what a novel concept?

Maybe we have stumbled onto something here?

The Judgment of Solomon – Nicolas Poussin

Maybe we can start changing hearts and minds by changing the nomenclature.

Pro-life vs. Pro-death

Please let's stop splitting the babies.

Concerned for all our souls

Apollos Rivoire, Jr.

Apollosrivoire@verizon.net

### The Quotations

### The haunting quotations of the past and the present

These are some profound thoughts for an quiet evening in front of the fireplace.

Quotations from past " prophets" of mankind that have helped shape our modern thinking about abortion without our even being the least bit aware.

Evil is timeless. It is among us always - patiently preying on our weaknesses.

It seems to disappear for a short period, but it never dies, not really.

It does occasionally slither away into the slime for a respit.

It choses to reside only in the shadows of our minds for a while.

When it returns, it corrupts a new generation with its nefarious clutch.

We are in that frightening clutch now.

We are living the "Lord of the Flies."

Which will we choose, the boar's head or the conch shell?

It appears that we may have already chosen.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

### Today's wisdom:

The death of a single baby pulled from the womb is a tragedy.

The deaths of millions is a statistic.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

### Quotation from the past:

"The death of one man is a tragedy,

the death of millions is a statistic."

Joseph Stalin 1878-1953

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

### Today's wisdom:

Abortion is the solution to all problems.

No babies – no problems.

Starvation, disease, abandonment, abuse,

all burdens and inconveniences go away.

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

### Quotation from the past:

"Death is the solution to all problems.

No men - no problem(s)"

Joseph Stalin 1878-1953

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

### Today's wisdom:

"Strip our youth of morals,

and we can change the world to be free to do as we please."

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

### Quotation from the past:

"The best revolutionary is a youth devoid of morals."

Adolf Hitler 1889 -1945

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

### Today's wisdom:

"Tell the world often enough

that a baby in the womb

is not a baby,

and it will become so."

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

### Quotation from the past:

"A lie told often enough becomes the truth."

Adolf Hitler 1889 -1945

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

### Today's wisdom:

"It is always more difficult to fight against faith

than against knowledge."

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

### Quotation from the past:

"It is always more difficult to fight against faith

than against knowledge."

Adolf Hitler 1889 -1945

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

### Today's wisdom:

"The abortion industry rejoices that the masses

remain passive and do not think."

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

### Quotation from the past:

"What good fortune for governments

that the people do not think."

"Our goal is to make the enemy passive."

Mao Zedong 1893-1976

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

### Today's wisdom:

"Those who profit from abortion are good people

interested in the health of women."

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

### Quotation from the past:

" **I am a decent man who exports flowers** **."**

Pablo Escobar 1949-1993

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

### Today's wisdom:

"Black Lives Matter"

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

### Quotation from the past:

" **We don't want the word to go out that we want**

to exterminate the Negro population,

and the minister is the man

who can straighten out that idea

if it ever occurs to any of

their more rebellious members."

Margaret Sanger, 1879-1966

Racist, eugenicist

Founder of Planned Parenthood

(You might say she is the Mother of Abortion)

(Wow, that's a strange title. I'll have to think about that one.)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

### Today's wisdom:

"A liberated woman has sex before marriage,

aborts if she gets pregnant,

and then pursues her career."

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

### Quotation from the past:

"A liberated woman is one who

has sex before marriage

and a job after."

Gloria Steinem

1934 -

In the past, the evil among us lurked in the shadows

For fear of being discovered and shamed

Today, evil basks in the sunlight with glee

and is worshiped as a heroine

The shameful act is performed

without the least bit of

conscience, remorse, or shame.

Again, "You have come a long way, baby"

Such profundity from a cigarette commercial.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Today's wisdom:

An unwanted pregnancy is a "mistake."

The resulting baby is a punishment for that mistake.

If your daughter gets pregnant,

she can correct the mistake

and avoid the punishment by killing the baby

" **problem" solved.**

♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

Quotation from the recent past:

"I've got two daughters.

9 years old and 6 years old.

I am going to teach them

first of all about values and morals.

But if they make a mistake,

I don't want them punished with a baby."

(Quotation listed under key words,

"teach," "mistake," and "baby." Really.)

"No one is pro-abortion." (oh, really)

Barack Hussein Obama

1961-

(This quotation from the leader of the free world about his daughters

frightens me more than all the others combined.)

There are dozens more. I just got tired and depressed.

Sorry, I didn't mean to ruin your day.

It's pitiful enough that I have ruined my own.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

The three living bastions of modern feminism

And "women's health"

Robin Gloria Jane

All the chief justices that started this mess are now all gone.

These three clowns are still with us.

They and their man-hating, pro-abortion policies

they promote are not all that amusing.

I'm not sure why I called them clowns since they are not very funny, not funny at all. Sorry, not very classy – a bit rude.

Pro-abortion liberals are always angry and don't have a sense of humor.

These gals are doing a good job of looking friendly and smiling, but Robin is having some difficulty cracking a smile.

They look so lovely and well-preserved.

They seem so proud of their accomplishments.

Their hair is nice.

The juxtaposition of Good and Evil

The removal of the Ten Commandments

under cover of night

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

The statue of Satan "Baphomet"and the Children

Detroit, Michigan

One last comment, and then I will shut up.

These are two examples of where we are and where we are headed. A monument of the Ten Commandments, a foundation of our society was removed from the Oklahoma Capital grounds based on a court ruling. (those dear court rulings) In Detroit, a nine-foot bronze statue of satan costing $100,000. was unveiled in front of a crowd of 800 "worshipers." This is not the work of a few, folks. Largely unmentioned in the news releases are the two children adoring their idol. This is where we are. And, we wonder why so few are upset about abortion? We don't even care about the babies after they grow up. Meet your new leader into the afterlife, children. Anyone going down? Actually, I am being unkind, he's not really that bad looking. I understand that the artist purposely gave him, it, a neutral expression so as not to scare the children. We wouldn't want to scare them on their way to hell, would we?

Much of the debate over the commandments and the Satan statue is as much about what they represent as it is about where they are allowed to be displayed. I have a suggestion that should at least settle the debate about where to put the Satan statue(s).

As a public service, one statue of Satan should be placed in front of each of the 1800 abortion clinics in the United States. Maybe they should be adorned with red flashing lights for night patrons. Yes, red flashing lights would be appropriate.

You know, after giving this abortion thing some thought, maybe it's not so bad after all? If we abort enough babies, there won't be any children left to worship Satan. That's good isn't it. But, then again, who would be left to worship God. Never mind – bad idea.

Remember the quote earlier?:

"The only thing that evil needs to flourish is that good men do nothing"

Well, the happenings in Oklahoma City and Detroit are evil. Good people can agree to that, can't they? They are both evil acts. But, those evil acts could not take place without "good men" doing nothing - the people who brought the law suit, the judges who made the decisions, the artist and crew who made the statue, the contractor that removed the ten comandments, the guys who transported the monument and the Satan statue, the people who attended the unveiling of Satan, the doting press that reported favorably about the events, the public that were unconcerned and took no action and on and on. We are not just witnessing "good men" who did nothing. They participated! They were complicit! They made it happen, for money!

These two events are not unrelated to the abortion issue. These happenings and thousands of events like them laid the foundation for the indifference toward evil we are experiencing today. There is a direct parallel between these two events and abortion – one preceeds the other. The difference is abortion is on such a monumental scale that the human brain cannot process it. Remember what the gentle soul, Joseph Stalin said,

"The death of one man is a tragedy, the death of a million is a statistic."

Who knows what Stalin would call a billion dead babies?

Unfathomable? Fortunately, he is not around to answer that question.

Pray for all of our souls that we may repent in time and be forgiven for doing nothing in the face of evil.

### A Sad Update

Undoctored video of high level Planned Parenthood administrators casually conducting the business of selling baby parts were ignored by a grand jury which indicted the investigators instead. If there were any doubt that evil forces are at work and have infiltrated every level of our government, this indictment removes any doubt. The inmates are truly running the asylum, and justice is a long lost memory. The following article by Ben Johnsoin in "LifeSiteNews" covers the details.

Ben Johnson

 Follow Ben

# Grand jury indicts pro-life investigator behind baby part videos, clears Planned Parenthood

HOUSTON, January 26, 2016 (LifeSiteNews)

The indictment of David Daleiden and another undercover investigator could keep other eyewitnesses from testifying about heinous crimes, for fear they will end up in the slammer, pro-life leaders said today.

Strong statements of outrage, resolution, and demands for justice followed the announcement on Monday that a Houston-area grand jury would not charge Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast with selling human organs – but charged investigators with the Center for Medical Progress, instead.

" _This has the effect of chilling the First Amendment freedom of the press and could scare crime witnesses away from coming forward for fear that they might suffer similar retaliatory prosecution," said Cheryl Sullenger, the senior vice president of_ Operation Rescue.

" _It is a sad day in America when those who harvest the body parts of aborted babies escape consequences for their actions, while the courageous truth-tellers who expose their misdeeds are handed down a politically motivated indictment instead," said_ Congressman Diane Black, R-TN.

She also noted the timing of the decision. "Just days after tens of thousands of pro-life Americans participated in the March for Life to urge legal protection for the unborn, this senseless decision is a grim reminder of the work yet to be done," she said.

Rep. Black vowed that the indictment "will not deter our efforts in Congress to hold Planned Parenthood accountable."

The aborton giant remains the target of a Congressional investigation that the organization has violated numerous felonies, including profiting from the sale of human organs and aborted babies' tissue and performing partial birth abortions to maximize the number of body parts harvested.

In the meantime, Daleiden faces up to 20 years in prison, along with his associate, Sandra Merritt, for "tampering with a governmental record" when they posed under false names to conduct a nearly three-year-long sting investigation. They also stand accused of making an earnest effort to purchase human organs. But their series of videos recording national Planned Parenthood figures dickering over the profit margin they hoped to get from "donating" aborted babies' organs went viral last summer and drew national attention to something few outside hardcore pro-life advocates knew.

"David Daleiden and his team have done a tremendous public service by exposing the horrific crimes against humanity that Planned Parenthood hides behind closed doors," said Live Action President Lila Rose on Monday. "CMP's investigation forced Planned Parenthood, a tax-funded billion dollar corporation, to admit it was harvesting and selling aborted baby parts."

"It's horrifying that the Houston grand jury failed to indict the organization who was willing to sell baby body parts yet somehow manages to indict the journalist who caught them in the act," said Kristan Hawkins, the president of Students for Life of America. She just awarded David Daleiden one of their Defender of Life awards at their national conference on Sunday in San Francisco. "I'm proud to stand with David, the Center for Medical Progress, and journalists everywhere on this one."

James O'Keefe – an undercover investigator who, like Daleiden, got his start working with Lila Rose – tweeted that the indictment continued Planned Parenthood's history of intimidating its opponents:

He felt the unwelcome development underscored the importance of CMP's work:

Despite the legal setback, Daleiden's revelations will one day bring justice to the nation's leading abortion provider, his friends believe.

" _Once the facts are allowed to come out, which Planned Parenthood and the NAF have worked night and day to conceal or misrepresent, we have every confidence that Daleiden and Merritt will be completely exonerated," Sullenger said. "In the meantime, Planned Parenthood remains under investigation by other state agencies in Texas, which we believe will reach different conclusions than that of the [Harris County District Attorney Devon] Anderson-influenced grand jury in Houston."_

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

How Planned Parenthood views babies

Photo: American Center for Law and Justice

Millions of people love and value babies.

This is how millions of others value babies.

We have lost our collective minds,

On our way to losing our collective souls.

(Those are actually low numbers charged by abortion clinics for the parts of aborted children, folks. It has been documented by Congressional investigation that parts from one baby sold for as much as $6,000. There may be a discount for bulk purchases or a premium charged for intact "corpses." An intact brain - jackpot.

It's disgusting just thinking about it)

The following you-tube presentation illustrates, contrary to their claims to the contrary that few, if any, Planned Parenthood Clinics provide any pre-natal care or post-abortion care whatsoever. So much for caring about "women's health."

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekgiScr364Y&feature=youtu.be&utm_source=Live+Action&utm_campaign=86c2dddcfe-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_01_23&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b50982edcd-86c2dddcfe-79614085

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

The real choices, not those choices on a sign

A woman you care about has an unexpected pregnancy and wants to have an abortion. She is frantic, confused, and desperate. As a devoted friend, best friend, family member, confidant, husband, or boy-friend . . . What should you do? What shouldn't you do? Here are some suggestions from a perfect stranger – a nobody.

First, put aside your own wishes or selfish involvement. Ignore the effect of the pregnancy on your life if there is an effect. This is not about you. This is about her, her baby, and the "Maker" of both. I know some will dispute the inclusion of "Maker," but for this discussion, patronize me.

Once you have isolated your desires, support her. Love her. Comfort her. Care about her. Don't abandon her. Be there for her. For real – you care about her don't you? This is where "caring" is tested. Caring is not a static word, it is a word of action. It is a commitment, a loyalty, a devotedness - not a casual expression of your magnanimity to impress others.

Next, discuss seriously, calmly, and lovingly about the moral thing, the most natural thing to do, and the most desirable option - bringing the baby to term. Letting her baby be born and keeping it. Counsel her. Don't pressure. Help her. If she agrees, do everything in your power to support her in being a good mother, the best mother. Convince others who care about her to do the same. Don't limit your kindness, your concern or your benevolence. Don't dare to leave her to face this crisis alone. Don't judge her, guide her.

If she agrees to bring her baby to term but will not or cannot care for the baby, discuss adoption by a responsible couple. Support her through this difficult decision and transfer as well. Get all the outside help you can. Despite all the negative propaganda, there are a myriad of agencies and individuals who can guide and provide assistance through her pregnancy, delivery, and the adoption process. There are armies of worthy couples willing to give the child a loving home and nurture her as if she were their own.

If, after all of this, she is determined to end the pregnancy – have an abortion, still don't abandon her. Try one last time to emphasize the irreversibility of the action. Fully instruct her about the consequences before during and after - specially the consequences after -the real possibility of later regret or remorse. Possibly introduce her to a woman who had an abortion and is experiencing the pain of regret. Counsel her through an individual of the cloth that she respects. Introduce her to literature or internet research from reliable sites.

This is a lot to absorb. It must not be rushed, but also time is of the essence. If abortion is the choice, the more time that passes the more dangerous and painful the procedure will be.

If all of these options fail, still don't abandon her. Even if it is strongly against your religious beliefs or your personal opinion, she is still a person you care about. Help her compassionately through the abortion process. She will need all the support you can give her. Don't judge her for her decision. Be there for the aftermath. Contrary to the proclamations of the soothsayers, her trials will not end with the abortion. Go on with your life with her as your friend. She will need you.

After all is done, by all means, review in detail with her the behavior that led to the pregnancy and ultimately the abortion. Attempt to have her modify that behavior; reevaluate her friends and acquaintances so as to avoid this tragedy again.

Finally, pray for her that some day, on her own, she realizes the enormity and consequences of her actions, and repents for those actions before she meets her Maker. If this epiphany does occur, pray together for her redemption and the soul of her child that never was. Move on with the serenity that you supported your friend and did all you could to save her from this trauma and the loss of the life of her baby. As a loyal and compassionate friend you could do no more.

Through this horrible experience, remember that your friend's pregnancy, her state of mind, and her actions were the result of decades of conditioning by evil forces. Humans can be and are indoctrinated and persuaded to believe anything and adopt horrible and immoral behavior. She was prey to this indoctrination through the insidious deception of tolerance of evil.

God gave us free will to conduct our lives as we see fit.

We are rarely victims, but we can and have allowed ourselves to be victimized.

We often gladly wear the cloak of victimization to conduct

behavior we otherwise know to be improper

and not in our physical or moral best interests.

We have been indoctrinated into believing:

That improper, risky, and immoral behavior have no consequences

That if there are consequences,

they can be avoided with even worse behavior

That all of this impropriety can later just be forgotten without remorse

That there will be no consequence even after death

The result is 1.4 billion abortions

"1A Plea for Intolerance"

by

Venerable Fulton J. Sheen

Written in 1931

Authors note: Observe that Fulton J. Sheen chose to entitle his treatise "A Plea for Intolerance" not "A Case for Intolerance," and not "A discussion of Intolerance." Even 86 years ago before the insanity and immorality of our generation took place he foresaw the moral cesspool in which we find ourselves. He pleaded that we reject the tolerance of evil, yet listen we did not. Shame on us.

Fulton J. Sheen's plea is reproduced here in its entirety with the hope that this time we will listen.

Will we?

"Those who shun wisdom shall be doomed to have none."

America, it is said, is suffering from intolerance. It is not. It is suffering from tolerance: tolerance of right and wrong, truth and error, virtue and evil, Christ and chaos. Our country is not nearly so much overrun with the bigoted as it is overrun with the broadminded. The man who can make up his mind in an orderly way, as a man might make up his bed, is called a bigot; but a man who cannot make up his mind, any more than he can make up for lost time, is called tolerant and broadminded. A bigoted man is one who refuses to accept a reason for anything; a broadminded man is one who will accept anything for a reason providing it is not a good reason. It is true that there is a demand for precision, exactness, and definiteness, but it is only for precision in scientific measurement, not in logic. The breakdown that has produced this unnatural broadmindedness is mental, not moral. The evidence for this statement is threefold: the tendency to settle issues not by arguments but by words, the unqualified willingness to accept the authority of anyone on the subject of religion, and, lastly, the love of novelty.

Voltaire boasted that if he could find but ten wicked words a day he could crush the "infamy" of Christianity. He found the ten words daily, and even a daily dozen, but he never found an argument, and so the words went the way of all words and the thing, Christianity, survived. Today, no one advances even a poor argument to prove that there is no God, but they are legion who think they have sealed up the heavens when they used the word "anthropomorphism." This word is just a sample of the catalogue of names which serve as the excuse for those who are too lazy to think. One moment's reflection would tell them that one can no more get rid of God by calling Him "anthropomorphic" than he can get rid of a sore throat by calling it "streptococci." As regards the use of the term "anthropomorphism," I cannot see that its use in theology is less justified than the use in physics of the term "organism," which the new physicists are so fond of employing. Certain words like "reactionary" or "medieval" are tagged on the Catholic Church and used with that same disrespect with which a man may sneer at a woman's age. Mothers do not cease to be mothers because their sons grow up, and the Mother Church of the Christian world, which began not in Boston but in Jerusalem, is not to be dispossessed of her glorious title simply because her sons leave home. Some day they may be glad to return, and their return will be the truest homecoming the world has ever seen.

Not only does the substitution of words for argument betray the existence of this false tolerance, but also the readiness of many minds to accept as an authority in any field an individual who becomes a famous authority in one particular field. The assumption behind journalistic religion is that because a man is clever in inventing automobiles, he is thereby clever in treating the relationship between Buddhism and Christianity; that a professor who is an authority on the mathematical interpretation of atomic phenomena is thereby an authority on the interpretation of marriage; and that am an who knows something about illumination can throw light on the subject of immortality, or perhaps even put out the lights on immortality. There is a limit to the transfer of training, and no one who paints beautiful pictures with his right hand can, in a day and at the suggestion of a reporter, paint an equally good one with his left hand. The science of religion has a right to be heard scientifically through its qualified spokesmen, just as the science of physics or astronomy has a right to be heard through its qualified spokesmen. Religion is a science despite the fact that some would make it only a sentiment.

Religion is not an open question, like the United Nations, while science is a closed question, like the addition table. Religion has its principles, natural and revealed, which are more exacting in their logic than mathematics. But the false notion of tolerance has obscured this fact from the eyes of many who are as intolerant about the smallest details of life as they are tolerant about their relations to God. In the ordinary affairs of life, these same people would never summon a Christian Science practitioner to fix a broken windowpane; they would never call in an optician because they had broken the eye of a needle; they would never call in a florist because they hurt the palm of their hand, nor go to a carpenter to take care of their nails. They would never call in a Collector of Internal Revenue to extract the nickel swallowed by the baby. They would refuse to listen to a Kiwanis booster discussing the authenticity of a painting, or to a tree surgeon settling a moot question of law. And yet for the all important subject of religion, on which our eternal destinies hinge, on the all important question of the relations of man to his environment and to his God, they are willing to listen to anyone who calls himself a prophet. And so our journals are filled with articles for these "broadminded" people, in which everyone from Jack Dempsey [a famous boxer at the time] to the chief cook of the Ritz Carlton tells about his idea of God and his view of religion. These same individuals, who would become exasperated if their child played with a wrongly colored lollipop, would not become the least bit worried if the child grew up without ever having heard the name of God.

Would it not be in perfect keeping with the fitness of things to insist on certain minimal requirements for theological pronouncements? If we insist that he who mends our pipes knows something about plumbing and that he who gives us pills knows something about medicine, should be not expect and demand that he who tells us about God, religion, Christ, and immortality at least say his prayers? If a violinist does not disdain to practice his musical scales, why should the modern theologian disdain to practice the elements of religion?

Another evidence of the breakdown of reason that has produced this weird fungus of broad mindedness is the passion for novelty, as opposed to the love of truth. Truth is sacrificed for an epigram and the Divinity of Christ for a headline in the Monday morning newspaper. Many a modern preacher is far less concerned with preaching Christ and Him crucified than he is his popularity with his congregation. A want of intellectual backbone makes him straddled the ox of truth and the ass of nonsense, paying compliment to Catholics because of their great organization and to sexologists because of their honest challenge to the youth of this generation. Bending the knee to the mob and pleasing men rather than God would probably make them scruple at ever playing the role of a John the Baptist before a modern Herod. No accusing finger would be leveled at a divorce or one living in adultery; no voice would be thundered in the ears of the rich, saying with something of the intolerance of Divinity: It is not lawful for you to live with your brother's wife. Rather would we hear: "Friend, times are changing!" The acids of modernity are eating away the fossils of orthodoxy. If you re noble sex urge to self expression finds its proper stimulus and response in no one but Herodias, then in the name of Freud and Russell accept her as your lawful wife to have and to hold until sex do ye part.

Belief in the existence of God, in the Divinity of Christ, and in the moral law is considered passing fashion. The latest thing in this new tolerance is considered the true thing, as if truth were a fashion, like the hat, instead of an institution, like a head. At the present moment, in psychology the fashion runs towards Behaviorism, as in philosophy it runs towards Temporalism. And that it is not objective validity which dictates the success of a modern philosophical theory, is borne out by the statement a celebrated space time philosopher of England made to the writer a few years ago, when he was asked where he got his system. From my imagination, he answered. Upon being challenged that the imagination was not the proper faculty for a philosopher to use, he retorted: It is, if the success of your philosophical system depends not on the truth that is in it, but on its novelty.

In that statement is the final argument for modern broad mindedness: truth is novelty, and hence truth changes with the passing fancies of the moment. Like the chameleon who changes his colors to suit the vesture on which he is placed, so truth is supposed to change to suit the foibles and obliquities of the age, as if the foundations of thinking might be true for the pre-Adamites and false for the Adamites. Truth does grow, but it grows homogeneously, like an acorn into an oak; it does not swing in the breeze, like a weathercock. The leopard does not change his spots nor the Ethiopian his skin, though the leopard be put in bars or the Ethiopian in pink tights. The nature of certain things is fixed, and none more so than the nature of truth. Truth maybe contradicted a thousand times, but that only proves that it is strong enough to survive a thousand assaults. But for any one to say, Some say this, some say that, therefore there is no truth, is about as logical as it would have been for Columbus, who heard some say, The earth is round, and other say, The earth is flat, to conclude: Therefore there is no earth at all.

It is this kind of thinking that cannot distinguish between a sheep and his second coat of wool, between Napoleon and his three cornered hat, between the substance and the accident, the kind that has begotten minds so flattened with broadness that they have lost all their depth. Like a carpenter who might throw away his rule and use each beam as a measuring rod, so, too, those who have thrown away the standard of objective truth have nothing left with which to measure but the mental fashion of the moment.

The giggling giddiness of novelty, the sentimental restlessness of a mind unhinged, and the unnatural fear of a good dose of hard thinking, all conjoin to produce a group of sophomoric latitudinarians who think there is no difference between God as Cause and God as a mental projection ; who equate Christ and Buddha, St. Paul and John Dewey, and then enlarge their broad mindedness into a sweeping synthesis that says not only that one Christian sect is just as good as another, but even that one world religion is just as good as another. The great god "Progress," is then enthroned on the altars of fashion, and as the hectic worshipers are asked, Progress towards what? The tolerant answer comes back, more progress. All the while sane men are wondering how there can be progress without direction and how there can be direction without a fixed point. And because they speak of a fixed point, they are said to be behind the times, when really they are beyond the times mentally and spiritually.

In the face of this false broad mindedness, what the world needs is intolerance. The mass of people have kept up hard and fast distinctions between dollars and cents, battleships and cruisers, You owe me and I owe you, but they seem to have lost entirely the faculty of distinguishing between the good and the bad, the right and the wrong. The best indication of this is the frequent misuse of the terms tolerance and intolerance. There are some minds that believe that intolerance is always wrong, because they make intolerance mean hate, narrow mindedness, and bigotry. These same minds believe that tolerance is always right because, for them, it means charity, broad mindedness, and "American good nature."

What is tolerance? Tolerance is an attitude of reasoned patience towards evil, and a forbearance that restrains us from showing anger or inflicting punishment. But what is more important than the definition is the field of its application. The important point here is this: Tolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons. Tolerance applies to the erring; intolerance to the error.

What has just been said here will clarify that which was said at the beginning of this chapter, namely, that America is suffering not so much from intolerance, which is bigotry, as it is from tolerance, which is indifference to truth and error, and a philosophical nonchalance that has been interpreted as broad mindedness. Greater tolerance, of course, is desirable, for there can never be too much charity shown to persons who differ with us. Our Blessed Lord Himself asked that we love those who calumniate for us, for they are always persons, but He never told us to love the calumny. In keeping with the Spirit of Christ, the Church encourages prayers for all those who are outside the pale of the Church, and asks that the greatest charity be shown towards them. As St. Francis de Sales was wont to say: It is easier to catch flies with a drop of honey than with a barrel of vinegar.

If some of us who are blessed with its sacred privileges believed the same things about the Church that her slanderers believe, if we knew her only through the words of traitors or third rate lies of dishonest historians, if we understood her only through those who were never cradled in her sacred associations, we would perhaps hate the Church just as much as they do. The bitterest enemies of the Church, those who accuse her of being unpatriotic, as Christ was accused of being before Pilate; of being unworldly, as Christ was accused of being before Herod; of being too dogmatic as Christ was accused of being before Caiaphas; or being too un-dogmatic, as Christ was accused of being Annas; of being possessed by the devil, as Christ was accused of being before the Pharisees these do not really hate the Church. They cannot hate the Church any more than they can hate Christ; they hate only that which the mistakenly believe to be the Catholic Church, and their hate is but their vain attempt to ignore. Charity, then, must be shown to persons, and particularly to those outside the fold who by charity must be led back, that there may be one fold and one Shepherd.

Thus far tolerance, but no farther. Tolerance does not apply to truth or principles. About these things we must be intolerant, and for this kind of intolerance, so much needed to rouse us from sentimental gush, I make a plea. Intolerance of this kind is the foundation of all stability. The government must be intolerant about malicious propaganda, and during the World War it made an index of forbidden books to defend national stability, as the Church, who is in constant warfare with error, made her index of forbidden books to defend the permanency of Christ s life in the souls of men. The government during the war was intolerant about the national heretics who refused to accept her principles concerning the necessity of democratic institutions, and took physical means to enforce such principles. The soldiers who went to war were intolerant about the principles they were fighting for, in the same way that a gardener must be intolerant about the weeds that grow in his garden. The Supreme Court of the United States is intolerant about any private interpretation of the first principle of the Constitution that every man is entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and the particular citizen who would interpret liberty in even such a small way as meaning the privilege to go on a red traffic light, would find himself very soon in a cell where there were no lights, not even the yellow the color of the timid souls who know not whether to stop or go. Architects are as intolerant about sand as foundations for skyscrapers as doctors are intolerant about germs in their laboratories, and as all of us are intolerant of a particularly broad minded, tolerant, and good natured grocer who, in making our bills, adds seven and ten to make twenty.

Now, if it is right and it is right for governments to be intolerant about the principles of government, and the bridge builder to be intolerant about the laws of stress and strain, and the physicist to be intolerant about the principles of gravitation, why should it not be the right of Christ, the right of His Church, and the right of thinking men to be intolerant about the truths of Christ, the doctrines of the Church, and the principles of reason? Can the truths of God be less exacting than the truths of mathematics? Can the laws of the mind be less binding than the laws of science, which are known only through the laws of the mind? Shall man, gifted with natural truth, who refuses to look with an equally tolerant eye on the mathematician who says two and two make five and the one who says two and two make four, be called a wise man, and shall God, Who refuses to look with an equally tolerant eye on all religions, be denied the name of Wisdom, and be called an intolerant God?

Shall we say that the reflected rays of the sun are warm but the sun is not hot? This we are equivalently saying when we admit intolerance of the principles of science and deny it to the Father of science, Who is God? And, if a government, with the inflexible principles of its constitution, distant from the foundation of government by miles and separated from it by lifetimes, can empower men to enforce that constitution, why cannot Christ choose and delegate men with the power of enforcing His Will and spreading His benedictions? And if we admit intolerance about the foundations of a government that at best looks after man s body, why not admit intolerance about the foundations of a government that looks after the eternal destiny of the spirit of man? For unlike human governments, there is no other foundation upon which men can build than upon the name Jesus.

Why, then, sneer at dogmas as intolerant? On all sides we hear it said today, "The modern world wants a religion without dogmas," which betrays how little thinking goes with that label, for he who says he wants a religion without dogmas is stating a dogma, and a dogma that is harder to justify than many dogmas of faith. A dogma is a true thought, and a religion without dogmas is a religion without thought, or a back without a backbone. All sciences have dogmas. Washington is the capital of the United States is a dogma of geography. Water is composed of two atoms of hydrogen and one of oxygen is a dogma of chemistry. Should we be broad minded and say that Washington is a sea in Switzerland? Should we be broad minded and say that H2O is a symbol for sulfuric acid?

We cannot verify all the dogmas of science, history, and literature, and therefore we are to take many of them on the testimony of others. I believe Professor Eddington, for example, when he tells me that Einstein s law of gravitation asserts that ten principal coefficients of curvature are zero in empty space, just as I do not believe Dr. Harry Elmer Barnes when he tells me that the cockroach has lived substantially unchanged on the earth for fifty million years. I accept Dr. Eddington's testimony because, by his learning and his published works, he has proved that he knows something about Einstein. I do not accept Dr. Barnes s testimony about cockroaches because he has never qualified in the eyes of the modern world as a cockroach specialist. In other words, I sift testimony and accept it on reason.

So also, my reason sifts the historical evidence for Christ; it weighs the testimony adduced by those who knew Him, and the testimony given by Himself. It fails to be swayed by those who start with a preconceived theory, rejecting all the evidence against their theory and accepting the residue as the Gospels. In the search, it comes across such works as those of Renan and Strauss, which are critical, but it also comes across such works as those of Fillion and Grandmaison: it knows the name of Loisy, but it also knows Lagrange; it knows the theory of Inge, but it also knows D. Herbigny. And this reason finally leads me to accept the testimony of Jesus Christ as the testimony of God. I then accept these truths, truths which I cannot prove, as was Professor Eddington's statement about Einstein and these truths become dogmas.

There can thus be dogmas of religion as well as dogmas of science, and both of them can be revealed, the one by God, the other by man. Not only that these fundamental dogmas, like the first principles [elements] of Euclid, can be used as raw material for thinking, and just as one scientific fact can be used as the basis of another, so one dogma can be used as the basis for another. But in order to begin thinking on a first dogma, one must be identified with it either in time or in principle. The Church was identified with Christ in both time and principle; she began thinking on His first principles and the harder she thought, the more dogmas she developed. Being organic like life, not institutional like a club, she never forgot those dogmas; she remembered them and her memory is tradition. Just as a scientist must depend on the memory of the first principles of his science, which he uses as the ground for other conclusions, so too the Church goes back into her intellectual memory, which is tradition, and uses former dogmas as the foundation for new ones. In this whole process she never forgets her first principles. If she did she would be like the un-dogmatic dogmatists of the present day, who believe that progress consists in denying the fact, instead of building on it; who turn to new ideals because they have never tried the old; who condemn as obscurantist the truth that has a parentage, and glorify as progressive a shibboleth that knows not either its father or its mother. They are of the school that would deny the very nature of things: free the camel of his hump and call him a camel; shorten the neck of a giraffe and call him a giraffe; and never frame a picture, because a frame is a limitation and therefore a principal and a dogma.

But it is anything but progress to act like mice and eat the foundations of the very roof over our heads. Intolerance about principles is the foundation of growth, and the mathematician who would deride a square for always having four sides, and in the name of progress would encourage it to throw away even only one of its sides, would soon discover that he had lost all his squares. So too with the dogmas of the Church, of science, and of reason; they are like bricks, solid things with which a man can build, not like straw, which is religious experience, fit only for burning.

A dogma, then, is the necessary consequence of the intolerance of first principles, and that science or that church which has the greatest amount of dogmas is the science or the church that has been doing the most thinking. The Catholic Church, the schoolmaster for twenty centuries, has been doing a tremendous amount of solid, hard thinking and hence has built up dogmas as a man might build a house of brick but grounded on a rock. She has seen the centuries with their passing enthusiasms and momentary loyalties pass before her, making the same mistakes, cultivating the same poses, falling into the same mental snares, so that she has become very patient and kind to the erring pupils, but very intolerant and severe concerning the false. She has been and she will always be intolerant so far as the rights of God are concerned, for heresy, error, untruth, affect not personal matters on which she may yield, but a Divine Right in which there is no yielding. Meek she is to the erring, but violent to the error. The truth is divine; the heretic is human. Due reparation made, she will admit the heretic back into the treasury of her souls, but never the heresy into the treasury of her wisdom. Right is right if nobody is right and wrong is wrong if everybody is wrong. And in this day and age we need, as Mr. Chesterton tells us, not a Church that is right when the world is right, but a Church that is right when the world is wrong.

The attitude of the Church in relation to the modern world on this important question may be brought home by the story of the two women in the courtroom of Solomon. Both of them claimed a child. The lawful mother insisted on having the whole child or nothing, for a child is like truth, it cannot be divided without ruin. The unlawful mother, on the contrary, agreed to compromise. She was willing to divide the babe, and the babe would have died of broad mindedness.

Some Pro-life Resources

Sisters and brothers sacrifiing on the front lines

God Bless Them

**Hyperlinks to a few of the hundreds of organizations** truly **interested in the health and well-being of women and in making abortion scarce**

(Press Control / left mouse click for access to each group.)

Do some good.

Please join them and support them and get those close to you to do the same.

You know this is wrong. Do something!

## **ROCK FOR LIFE**

##   
WOMEN SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES

##   
OPERATION RESCUE

##   
**FEMINISTS FOR NON-VIOLENT CHOICES**

##   
**SAVE THE STORKS**

##   
**TEXAS RIGHT TO LIFE**

##   
TEXAS ALLIANCE FOR LIFE

##   
**NEW JERSEY RIGHT TO LIFE**

##   
CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA

##   
MARCH FOR LIFE

##   
PRO-LIFE ACTION MINISTRIES

##   
LIVE ACTION

##   
RIGHT TO LIFE OF INDIANAPOLIS

##   
GREAT LAKES GABRIEL PROJECT

##   
ALLEN COUNTY RIGHT TO LIFE

##   
CALIFORNIANS FOR LIFE

##   
AMERICANS UNITED FOR LIFE

##   
TEXAS PRO-LIFE

##   
GREATER COLUMBUS RIGHT TO LIFE

##   
PRO-LIFE WACO

##

## KENTUCKY RIGHT TO LIFE ASSOCIATION

##   
CENTRAL KENTUCKY RIGHT TO LIFE

##   
AMERICAN LIFE LEAGUE

##   
AND THEN THERE WERE NONE

##   
CEC FOR LIFE

##   
SURVIVORS OF THE ABORTION HOLOCAUST

##   
LIFE MATTERS JOURNAL

##   
**WHOLE LIFE HAWAII**

##   
PA FAMILY COUNCIL

##   
PROTEST ABQ

##   
PRO-LIFE WITNESS

##   
BOTT RADIO

##   
HERITAGE ACTION FOR AMERICA

##   
**FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL**

##

## NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE COUNCIL

##

WOMEN BETRAYED

STUDENTS FOR LIFE OF AMERICA

SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST

AMERICAN LIFE LEAGUE

THOMAS MOORE SOCIETY

FEMINISTS FOR LIFE

PROLIFE ACTION LEAGUE

HUMAN LIFE INTERNATIONAL

FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL

TFP STUDENT ACTION

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

100's and 100's of groups folks:

Additional Pro-Life Group links are listed at "Wikipedia"

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:American_pro-life_organizations

and more groups

" **The Anti-abortion Directory" at "Abortion Reason"**

<http://www.abortionreason.com/antiabortion-organizations.php>

and

I'll bet you think you are alone. You are not.

Well, that's just what the media and the abortion industries want you to believe.
Other reading

Here is an entire bookshelf of other free E-books you might enjoy

by the same author if you are still with me.

Control/left mouse click on the link will take you directly to the book site.

Select the format suitable for your device and download. Enjoy.

Download them all. They take very little memory on your device.

The entire bookshelf requires less than 250 Megabytes of memory.

See, the best things in life are free. But, they won't be free forever.

### Books published by Apollos Rivoire, Jr.

1 - "A Night at the Opera"

<https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/531027>

2 - "The Good Parents"

<https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/534874>

3 - "A Voyage Interrupted"

<https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/539105>

4 - "Split the Baby?"

<https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/576768>

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

### Books Published by Joseph P. Badame

### 1 - "My Teacher, My Bride"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/483616

### 2 - "Hugs and Kisses"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/490293

### 3 - "Last Day of School – First Day of Us"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/491303

### 4 - "Our First Kiss – Our Last Kiss"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/491493

### 5 - "My One Grand Regret"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/491620

### 6 - "Our Marriage in Saint Peter's Basilica"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/491930

### 7 - "The Cookie and the Dandelions"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/492395

### 8 - "Claustrophobia

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/492626

### 9 - "Our Moment – Falling in Love Again"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/493421

### 10 - "Life's Book for Happy Marriage"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/494964

### 11- "Daddy, Mommy! Are you awake?

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/496667

### 12 - "My Dear was Sweeter than Sugar"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/497530

### 13 - "No Thanks!"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/500128

### 14 -"The Gifts"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/503067

15 - "I Give Up - You Win"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/505985

### 16 - "Intimacy and Disability"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/508482

### 17 - "The Death of the Love of My Life"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/508998

### 18 - "Peace Corps Adventure in Tunisia"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/529297

### 19 - "A Message from Heaven"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/530292

### 20 -"Screams!"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/535064

### 21 -"The Power of Writing"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/536094

### 22 - "Cruising with a Disabled Love One"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/538418

### 23 - "The Man of No"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/538582

### 24 - "Janet Devlin"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/539981

### 25 - "The Last Mothers' Day"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/540098

### 26 - "The Way We Were"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/545363

### 27 - "Home Alone with Phyliss"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/545660

### 28 - "Life is Good for Some"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/545908

### 29 - "The Magic of a Master Teacher"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/569466

### 30 - "Washing the Dishes"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/578705

### 31 - "Tiny Rain Drops"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/588538

### 32 -"The Nightmare and the Chubby Cups"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/592374

### 33 -"Who Am I????"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/649705

### 34 - "Merry Christmas Mum and Dad"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/690185

35 \- "My Lunch at Chick-Fil-A"

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/692552

### * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Please help our returning heroes and heroines in need.

Sadly, they can no longer rely on help from those who sent them in harm's way.

They and their families helped us.

Now, we need to help them.

Please make a donation of finances or time or both.

Encourage others to do likewise, and have them in turn tell others.

These brave souls and their families have crosses to bear that we cannot even imagine.

Don't rely on someone else to do it.

<https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/>

