There’s a section within the left.
I refer to them as the regressive left and
I want to clarify I don’t mean all of those
on the left.
I mean a section that have come to the view
for the sake of political correctness, for
the sake of tolerating what they believe is
other cultures and respecting different lifestyles.
They have an inherent hesitation to challenge
some of the bigotry that can occur within
minority communities.
I mean at the end of the day if we truly subscribe
to liberal human rights values in their universality
and the universal declaration of human rights
they apply not just in favor of minority communities
but in some instances upon minority communities
too.
And it’s what I call the racism of low expectations
to lower those standards when looking at a
brown person if a brown person happens to
express a level of misogyny, chauvinism, bigotry
or anti-Semitism and yet hold other white
people to universal liberal standards.
The real victim of that double standard are
the minority communities themselves because
by doing so we limit their horizons, we limit
their own ceiling and expectations as what
they aspire to be where judging them is somehow
that their culture is inherently less civilized
and of course that we are tolerating bigotry
within communities and the first victims of
that bigotry happen to be those who are weakest
from among those communities.
And that’s who I refer to as the minorities
within the minority.
The minorities within the minority are every
feminist Muslim, every gay Muslim, lesbian
Muslim, every liberal Muslim, every dissenting
voice, ex-Muslims.
And these are people who mainstream society
will judge because they have Muslim names
and brown skin invariably.
So they have to suffer a lot of the discrimination
that anyone else may suffer from mainstream
society but even within their own community
and then further discriminated against because
of course it goes without saying that levels
of tolerance towards to gays, and perhaps
levels of anti-Semitism and liberal values
there are still many, many challenges when
it comes to those values within Muslim community.
So they suffer from both ends and that’s
why I say that if we truly as liberals care
for the weakest among us as any liberalist
society should be judged by.
Then those who are the weakest among us I
believe are the minorities within the minority
communities.
It’s the emphasis on group rights and on
the identity of group rights rather than seeking
out the individual within the groups and thereby
what happens is invariably those individuals
within the groups, the minorities within the
minorities have a progressive struggle ahead
of them.
The group, you know, the Muslim community
for want of a better term doesn’t have a
progressive struggle.
It’s identifying itself as a Muslim and
for whatever reason good or bad currently
the Muslim debate isn’t as liberal, isn’t
as committed to universal human rights values
as I would like it to be at least.
So in protecting the group identity we end
up reinforcing in liberal values because we
prioritize cultural tolerance over the progress
and the advancement of liberalism within minority
communities.
And that’s how they end up losing out on
being allies.
Now I think that a true liberal would always
prioritize individuals over the group, would
always prioritize heresy over orthodoxy, will
always prioritize the dissenting voice over
the status quo.
That’s what a true liberal should be looking
for.
Within the Muslim minority context that means
finding those voices while critical of their
own culture and I find liberals a very good
when it comes to criticizing mainstream society
being introspective about our own foreign
policy mistakes and rightly so.
Yet there isn’t that expectation that a
Muslim can in turn be introspective about
their own Muslim community into which they
were born.
And the other thing I think is very important
here we talk about credible voices, authentic
voices.
There’s an assumption, an orientalist assumption
again because of the racism of low expectations
that the real Muslim, the credible Muslim,
the authentic Muslim is the conservative Muslim.
And if you have a liberal Muslim there’s
almost this sniggering assumption that they’re
not really a Muslim.
They’re just, you know, too Westernized.
So they’re not a real Muslim voice.
And I think I want to draw an analogy here
for liberals they’ll understand this.
When it comes to self-identification we are
the at the cusp of a watershed moment with
transgender rights both in America and across
the western world.
And we know, we know it’s wrong to insist
that somebody born in a man’s body who identifies
as a woman it’s wrong to insist in their
face that no, you’re a man whether you like
it or not.
No matter how you want to identify yourself
I’m going to call you a man against your
own will and wishes because that’s what
I want to do.
Likewise a Muslim who is a liberal and who
happens to be gay, happens to be lesbian,
happens to be a feminist it’s not up to
us to somehow invalidate their Muslim experience.
Their Muslim experience is as valid, as authentic
and as credible as that conservative Muslim
who’s, you know a strict literalist Muslim.
And so we have this – unfortunately we have
this tendency that a real credible Muslim
voice is every regressive conservative literalist
Muslim voice out there.
And we prop them up as the spokesman for the
communities and they are invariably men.
And I think that that’s actually part of
the mistake and it comes as is born of orientalism,
is born of an essentialization, a desire to
reduce Muslim culture to this caricature that
it is this kind of, you know, Medieval culture
and then fantasize it in that way.
And I think that’s incredibly sad and illiberal.
