
English: 
 
ANCHOR IN AMERICA.

English: 
>> THAT'S "NIGHTLY NEWS."
I'M LESTER HOLT.
♪♪
>>> GOOD EVENING.
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR JOINING 
US.
I'M MORGAN RADFORD.
WELCOME TO SPECIAL COVERAGE OF 
THE SECOND NIGHT OF THE FIRST 
DEMOCRATIC DEBATE OF THE 2020 
ELECTION CYCLE RIGHT HERE ON NBC
NEWS NOW.
THIS IS A LIVE LOOK AT THE 
DEBATE STAGE WHERE IN JUST ABOUT
AN HOUR, TEN MORE DEMOCRATIC 
PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES WILL 
TAKE THEIR PLACE AT THOSE 
PODIUMS.
WE HEARD FROM THE FIRST TEN LAST
NIGHT ON THAT SAME STAGE AND 
AGAIN THEY ARE STANDING BASED ON
THEIR RESULTS IN PUBLIC POLLING 
THROUGH JUNE 12th.
TAKING THE CENTER POSITION, 
FORMER VICE PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN 
AND BERNIE SANDERS.
THEY'LL BE FLANKED BY BUTTIGIEG 
AND KAMALA HARRIS AND JUST A BIT
ABOUT HOW THE NIGHT IS GOING TO 
WORK ON THE SECOND NIGHT.

English: 
SAME DEAL.
CANDIDATES HAVE 60 SECONDS TO 
ANSWER QUESTIONS.
30 SECONDS TO RESPOND TO 
FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS AND THEN A 
FINAL CHANCE TO MAKE THEIR 
CLOSING STATEMENTS.
BUT BEFORE THE NIGHT BEGINS, 
WE'RE HERE TO PREVIEW THE ISSUES
THAT ARE LIKELY GOING TO COME 
UP.
WHAT WE'RE GOING TO HEAR AND 
THEN BREAK DOWN WHY THOSE ISSUES
MATTER.
OF COURSE, TONIGHT, ALL EYES 
WILL BE ON VICE PRESIDENT JOE 
BIDEN.
HE'S LEADING THE REST OF THE 
PACK IN THE POLLS.
THAT'S AT 32%.
SENATOR SANDERS IS POLLING 
SECOND BASED ON THE REAL CLEAR 
POLITICS AVERAGE.
WE SEE HIM AT 17%.
AS A POINT OF COMPARISON, 
SANDERS HAS ALREADY BEEN TRYING 
TO CONTRACT HIS RECORD WITH 
BIDEN'S.
BUT IF LAST NIGHT WAS ANY 
INDICATION, IT COULD BE THE 
CANDIDATES THERE AT THE BOTTOM 
OF YOUR SCREEN WHO ARE POLLING 
IN THE LOWER SINGLE DIGITS WHO 
COULD BE THE MOST WILLING TO 
TAKE SHOTS AT THOSE STANDING IN 
THE CENTER STAGE.
IN THE CENTER OF THE PODIUM AND 
THOSE ARE THE CANDIDATES POLLING
MORE HIGH.

English: 
HERE TO HELP ME DIVE INTO THE 
QUESTIONS, REPUBLICAN POLITICAL 
CONSULTANT MICHAEL SINGLETON, 
ALEX THOMPSON AND MSNBC 
POLITICAL ANALYST SERLINA 
MAXWELL.
>> HOW CAN WE EXPECT TO SEE 
SOMETHING DIFFERENT TONIGHT?
>> IT'S GOING TO BE FAR MORE 
COMBATANT.
HE CAN SAY, I AM THE GUY 
>> THEY REPRESENT TWO DIFFERENT 
WINGS OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
THE PROGRESSIVE WING AND MORE 
MODERATE CENTRIST WING.
YOU'LL SEE THAT AND THEY'LL GO 
AT EACH OTHER AND IT'S THE FIRST
TIME I'M SEEING IT.
>> ALEX, WHAT ABOUT THE BREAKOUT
STARS.
LAST NIGHT WE SAW A LOT OF 
PEOPLE WERE TWEETING ABOUT 
JULIAN CASTRO.
A LOT OF PEOPLE TALKING ABOUT 
BOOKER.
DO WE EXPECT TO SEE A SIMILAR 

English: 
BREAKOUT STAR TONIGHT.
>> YOU'RE ALREADY GOING TO HAVE 
SOME, I GUESS, MORE EXOTIC 
CANDIDATES WHEN YOU HAVE ANDREW 
YANG, MARIANNE WILLIAMSON IN THE
RACE.
THEY'LL ATTRACT ATTENTION.
AND THEN EVEN PEOPLE LIKE 
MICHAEL BENNET HAVE BENNETT, PE 
CAMPAIGN SAY THEY EXPECT TO DRAW
A CONTRAST, THAT USUALLY MEANS 
THEY WILL GO ON THE OFFENSIVE.
AND YOU HAVE MAYOR PETE AND 
KAMALA RIGHT THERE.
KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND HAS BEEN 
REALLY STRUGGLING TO GET THE 
DONORS UP, AND SHE WILL TRY TO 
MAKE HAD A MOMENT FOR HER LEVEL.
>> WITH SO MANY FRONT-RUNNERS ON
THE STAGE, HOW WILL THEY TRY TO 
DISTINGUISH THEIR TACTICS 
STRATEGICALLY IN TERMS OF 
GETTING THEIR PLATFORM OUT 
THERE?
>> I THINK BERNIE SANDERS HAS TO
HIT JOE BIDEN HARD AND SAY YOU 
ARE NOT IN TOUCH WITH WHERE THE 
CURRENT DEMOCRATIC PARTY, IS AND
WHAT'S INTERESTING IS TO SEE HOW
JOE BIDEN RESPONDS.
JOE BIDEN, WOULD I ARGUE, HAS A 
BIT OF A TEMPERAMENT.
DOES HE SORT OF RISE ABOVE AND 
SAY, OKAY, WHATEVER, I'M STILL 
THE FRONT-RUNNER AND THE BEST 

English: 
ONE AGAINST TRUMP OR DOES HE 
SLING ARROW, IF YOU WILL, AT 
BERNIE SANDERS WHICH WOULD GIVE 
SOMEONE LIKE MAYOR PETE OR 
KAMALA HARRIS AN OPPORTUNITY TO 
ELEVATE THEMSELVES.
>> WHAT DO YOU MEAN WHEN YOU SAY
ABOUT THE TEMPER?
>> WHEN JOE BIDEN WAS 
INTERVIEWING WITH AL SHARPTON 
AND HE WAS PRESSING HIM HARD, 
TRYING TO GIVE HIM EVERY 
OPPORTUNITY TO APOLOGIZE, YOU 
SAW A MOMENT WHERE HE GOT VERY 
DEFENSIVE AND REFUSED TO 
APOLOGIZE AND I WOULD VENTURE TO
SAY IF HE'S ATTACKED TOO MUCH, 
IF HE LOSES SUCH TEMPER RATHER I
PREDICT THAT WE WILL SEE JOE 
BIDEN SORT OF SAY I'M THE BEST 
ONE TO DO THIS, I DON'T CARE 
WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY.
LOOK AT MY POLL NUMBERS AND THAT
MAY NOT RESONATE VERY WELL WITH 
DEMOCRATIC VOTERS. 
>> THE OTHER THING HE DOES IS HE
MAKES A JOKE WHEN IT'S NOT 
APPROPRIATE TO MAKE A JOKE.
THE CONTROVERSY OVER HUGGING 
PEOPLE WITHOUT ASKING FOR OR 
TOUCHING PEOPLE WITHOUT THEIR 
PERMISSION AND HE MADE A JOKE AT
AN EVENT SUBS KEPTLY, I'M 
TALKING ABOUT LUCY FLORES, FOR 
EXAMPLE, AND HE MADE A JOKE, AND
IT WAS VERY -- IT WAS VERY OUT 

English: 
OF TOUCH.
IT WAS TONE DEAF GIVEN THE FACT 
THAT THIS IS A SERIOUS 
CONVERSATION SO I -- I HOPE THAT
HE DOESN'T GAFFE THAT WAY 
SFWLEERT SPEAKING OF THE SERIOUS
CONVERSATION, WAS IT JUST ME OR 
LAST NIGHT DID WE SEE THE 
MOMENTS WHERE THE CANDIDATES 
ALMOST LIKE TRIED TO OUTDEMOCRAT
EACH OTHER GO, AS FAR AS THEY 
COULD TO THE LEFT, BUT IF THEY 
DO THAT TONIGHT DO THEY RISK 
THEN ALIENATING THE GENERAL 
POPULATION?
>> I THINK THEY DO.
JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HEY, AND I 
WOULD EVEN ARGUE MAYOR PETE IN 
MANY WAYS ARE SORT I WOULD SAY 
TRYING TO GET VOTERS FROM THE 
SAME CENTRIST WING OF THE PARTY 
THAT WE WERE JUST TALKING ABOUT.
I THINK BERNIE SANDERS, HOWEVER,
WILL TRY TO FOCUS ON SOME OF 
WHAT ELIZABETH WARREN TALKED 
ABOUT THE OTHER NIGHT.
HE HAVE'S GOING TO SHOWCASE TO 
THOSE VOTERS THAT, YES, 
ELIZABETH WARREN IS A GOOD 
CANDIDATE BUT, REMEMBER, I'M THE
ORIGINAL GUY.
I'M THE ORIGINAL ONE WHO BROUGHT
US THESE IDEAS FOUR YEARS AGO IN
2016, AND NOW LOOK AT HOW I HAVE
SHAPED AND TRANSFORMED THE 
DEMOCRATIC THAT'S RIGHT.
>> ALEX, WHAT DO YOU THINK?

English: 
>> ON THAT QUESTION I THINK YOU 
HAVE GOT TO LOOK AT BIDEN AND 
BENT AND LOOK AT KAMALA TO SEE 
IF THEY TRY TO SAY I'M THE MOST 
PROGRESSIVE.
BIDEN IS I'VE BEEN SO 
PROGRESSIVE ALL THE TIME OR DOES
HE TRY TO STAKE OUT THE TIME AND
SAY I'M NOT LIKE BERNIE, NOT 
GOING TO DO MEDICARE FOR ALL, 
AND DOES HE START ARGUING FOR 
THE CENTRIST WING THE PARTY OR 
SAY I'M PROGRESSIVE ENOUGH AND 
THAT DISTINCTION IS KEY.
YOU SAW EVERYONE SAYING I'M 
PROGRESSIVE ENOUGH. 
>> WHO DO YOU THINK POSES THE 
BIGGEST THREAT TO BIDEN IN TERMS
OF POLICY?
WHO HAS THE MOST SIMILAR 
POLICIES?
>> TODAY.
OH, TODAY.
I DON'T THINK THERE IS A DIRECT 
CHALLENGE TODAY.
I THINK THE CHALLENGE IS 
ELIZABETH WARREN, BUT THAT'S NOT
TODAY, RIGHT.
I THINK THE CONTRAST IS GOING TO
BE CAN BERNIE SANDERS ARTICULATE
THE SAME PROGRESSIVE VISION WITH
THE DETAILS, WITH THE MEAT. 
>> BERNIE SANDERS. 
>> AND IN ADDITION IS HE GOING 

English: 
TO BE ABLE TO ADD ON TO THE 
MOMENTUM HE CREATED IN 2016?
>> AND WHEN ABOUT THE OTHER 
SIDE?
I MEAN, WHAT ABOUT THESE SWING 
VOTERS AND PERHAPS SOME OF THOSE
TRUMP VOTERS, ARE THESE 2020 
DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES DOING 
ENOUGH TO TRY TO SPEAK TO 
CONSERVATIVES?
>> I DON'T THINK SO.
LOOK, I HAVE TO BE HONEST.
I THINK DEMOCRATS ARE MOVING TOO
FAR TO THE LEFSHTS AND I THINK 
WHAT WE SAW LAST NIGHT, I THINK 
WHAT WE WILL LIKELY HEAR FROM 
BERNIE SANDERS IS NOT IN SYNC 
WITH WHERE A VAST MAJORITY OF 
THE COUNTRY IS AND I THINK HE 
NEEDS TO BE CHALLENGED ON THE 
FAR-FETCHING NOTION AND IDEAS, 
HOW ARE YOU GOING TO GET THIS 
STUFF PASSED, EVEN IF THE 
DEMOCRATS WERE TO CONTROL THE 
HOUSE AND SENATE MANY WITHIN THE
PARTY DON'T SUPPORT SOME OF 
THOSE IDEAS AND I THINK BERNIE 
SANDERS IS GOING TO HAVE A HARD 
TIME TRYING TO CONTRAST, YES, 
I'M THE GUY TO BRING THE COUNTRY
TOGETHER AND REACH OUT TO THE 
DISAFFECTED VOTERS.
>> AND THE PARTY IS AT A POINT 
WHERE THEY ARE TRYING TO 
REDEFINE THEMSELVES, NOT ONLY 
INTERNALLY BUT MORE TO WHAT 
WE'LL SEE TONIGHT.
THANK YOU FOR STICKING AROUND 
WITH US.
A LITTLE BIT LATER, WE'LL HAVE A

English: 
LONG NIGHT.
WE'LL TAKE A QUICK BREAK AND 
STAY WITH US FOR SPECIAL 
COVERAGE OF THE FIRST 

English: 
PRESIDENTIAL DEMOCRATIC DEBATE 
RIGHT HERE ON "NBC NEWS NOW."
>> LET'S HEAD OVER TO THE SPIN 
ROOM NOW WHERE THE FINAL 
PREPARATIONS ARE UNDER WAY 
BEFORE THE CANDIDATES TAKE THE 
STAPLING, AND AS YOU CAN SEE 
THAT'S WHERE WE FIND NBC'S 
GARRETT HAYES.
GARRETT, GOOD EVENING.
GIVE US A LITTLE BIT OF A TOUR.
SHOW US AROUND AND WHAT'S GOING 
ON IN MIAMI NOW. 
>> MORGAN, IN ABOUT TWO HOURS 
THIS WILL BE THE CENTER OF THE 
POLITICAL UNIVERSE IN WHICH ALL 
THE CAMPAIGNS AND THEIR STAFF 
WILL BE IN HERE TELLING US BRETT
LESLEY THAT EACH AND EVERY ONE 
OF THEM WON THE DEBATE AND WHY 
THEY WILL BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT 
OF THE UNITED SATES, BUT FOR NOW
IT'S KIND OF THE CALM BEFORE THE
STORM.
THIS AREA WAS PACKED ALL NIGHT 
LAST NIGHT.
IT WILL BE PACKED TO THE UNTIL 
ABOUT 1:00 IN THE MORNING YOU 
CAN SEE OUR SET IN THE 
BACKGROUND.
ALL THE CANDIDATES DROPPING BY 
HERE TO TALK ABOUT HOW THEY 
PERFORMED, AND THEN THE 
CANDIDATES, THEIR STAFF AND ALL 
THESE REPORTERS, 700 OF US FROM 
AROUND THE WORLD, COVERING THE 
CAMPAIGN.
FOR NOW THOUGH THINGS ARE QUITE,

English: 
AND I HAVE TO TELL YOU THERE'S A
LITTLE BIT OF A DIFFERENT 
ATMOSPHERE TONIGHT I THINK FOR 
TWO REASONS.
NUMBER ONE, ALL THE CANDIDATES 
INCLUDING THOSE WHO COMPETED 
LAST NIGHT, PERFORMED LAST 
NIGHT, HAVE NOW SEEN HOW THIS 
PROCESS GOES, AND THE FOLKS WHO 
ARE COMING UP TONIGHT KNOW A 
LITTLE BIT ABOUT HOW THE 
MODERATORS ARE TREATING THE 
QUESTIONS AND HOW THE CANDIDATES
ARE LIKELY TO TREAT EACH OTHER 
AND TONIGHT YOU HAVE MORE OF THE
EXPERIENCED DEBATERS ON THE 
STAGE.
JOE BIDEN AND BERNIE SANDERS 
HAVE BOTH DONE THE 
MULTI-CANDIDATE PRESIDENTIAL 
FORMULA BEFORE, AND EVEN THOUGH 
THE OTHER CANDIDATES WHO HAVE 
NOT KAMALA HARRIS, FOR EXAMPLE, 
MICHAEL BENNETT, SOME OF THESE 
SENATORS ARE A LITTLE MORE 
PRACTICED IN THIS TYPE OF 
DEBATING, SO I DO THINK IT'S A 
LITTLE BIT LESS OF THAT NEAR 
VOWS ENERGY THAN LAST NIGHT WHEN
SO MANY PEOPLE WERE LOOKING FOR 
THE MOMENT TO BREAK OUT. 
>> I WAS FOLLOWING YOU LAST 
NIGHT ON TWITTER AND SEEING YOU 
ON TELEVISION AND YOU HAD A 
MOMENT IN THIS ROOM WITH BETO.
WHAT DID YOU LEARN AND WHAT WAS 
THE SCOOP THAT YOU GOT LAST 
NIGHT?

English: 
>> I THINK TWO THINGS.
NUMBER ONE, JULIAN CASTRO'S BIG 
MOMENT WITH BETO O'ROUKE WAS NO 
ACCIDENT.
THAT WAS VERY MUCH A PLANNED 
MOMENT OF TRYING TO CONTRAST 
WITH ANOTHER TEXAN ON A VERY 
SPECIFIC ISSUE, TO PUT O'ROURKE 
ON HIS BACK HEEL.
WHAT YOU SAW IN THAT EXCHANGE 
WAS A DIFFERENCE IN STYLE AND 
PREPARATION.
O'ROURKE SAID ALL ALONG HE'S NOT
MUCH OF A DEBATE-FOCUSED GUY.
HE'S A STORYTELLER AND WANTS TO 
TELL THE STORY OF THE PEOPLE 
HE'S MET AROUND THE COUNTRY AND 
JULIAN CASTRO WANTED TO MAKE A 
VERY SPECIFIC POINT ABOUT POLICY
AND WANTED TO MAKE IT AT BETO 
O'ROUKE'S EXPENSE.
TEXAS IS A BIG STATE, BUT 
THERE'S PROBABLY NOT ROOM ENOUGH
IN THIS RACE FOR TWO 
UP-AND-COMERS FROM THE LONE STAR
STATE.
THEY COMPETE FOR DONORS AND 
VOTERS AND ATTENTION.
AND THEY WILL COMPETE AGAIN 
TOMORROW NIGHT.
CASTRO WILL BE IN AUSTIN AND 
O'ROURKE'S CAMPAIGN ADDED AN 
EVENT IN AUSTIN THIS AFTERNOON. 
>> INTERESTING. 
>> I ALSO SAW THAT FORMER 

English: 
CHAIRMAN MICHAEL STEELE IS 
SAYING JULIO IS TRYING TO PUNCH 
SIDEWAYS AND YOU MENTIONED THE 
STYLE AND THE PREPARATION.
BUT WHAT ABOUT THE STRATEGY?
HOW DO YOU THINK THE STRATEGY 
WILL BE DIFFERENT TONIGHT?
>> INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH I THINK 
THE TWO FRONT-RUNNERS IN THE 
CENTER OF THE STAGE HAVE SIMILAR
STRATEGIES.
THEY WANT TO TALK ABOUT 
THEMSELVES, THEIR RECORD AND 
VISION FOR THE FUTURE AND A LOT 
LESS THAN DONALD TRUMP.
EVERYONE ELSE ON THAT STAGE MAY 
HAVE A DIFFERENT SET OF 
OBJECTIVES.
I'M TALK ABOUT THE TWO 
COLORADOANS HERE, JOHN 
HICKENLOOPER AND MICHAEL 
BENNETT.
I CAN SEE THEM HAVING THEIR EYES
ON BERNIE SANDERS.
THEY HAVE A VERY DIFFERENT 
VISION FOR WHAT THE DEMOCRATIC 
PARTY IS THE ALL ABOUT.
DO THEY WANT TO MIX IT UP ON 
SOMEBODY THEY DESAGREE WITH ON 
SOME OF THESE BIG QUESTIONS, 
THIS ISSUE.
THIS DEBATE TONIGHT HAS TWO OF 
THE MOST INTERESTING CANDIDATES.
TWO UNIQUE CANDIDATES ON THE 
DEBATE STAGE AT THE SAME TIME, 
ANDREW YANG AND MARIANNE 
WILLIAMSON, BOTH OF WHOM HAVE 
BIG FOLLOWS ONLINE AND PLATFORMS
THAT I THINK ARE SAY TO SAY 
OUTSIDE THE DEMOCRATIC 

English: 
MAINSTREAM AND THEY HAVE ELBOWED
THEIR WAY ON THE DEBATE STABLE 
AND BOTH OF THEM ARE PRETTY WELL
PRIMED TO BRING THEIR MESSAGE TO
THE MASSES, PARTICULARLY YANG 
WHO HAS SUCH A BIG ARM LINE 
FOLLOWING.
ANY DROP COULD BE HAVE -- A LOT 
OF THE WAYS THAT BERNIE SANDERS 
DID BACK IN 2016. 
>> I HAVE TO SAY I ALWAYS ENJOY 
LEARNING FROM YOU.
I LEARN AS MUCH FROM YOUR 
REPORTING AS I DO FROM YOUR 
ANALYSIS AND THANKS FOR BEING ON
THE GROUND FOR US TONIGHT.
STAY WITH US.
WE'LL BE BACK IN A MOMENT WITH 
MORE SPECIAL COVERAGE OF THE 

English: 
FIRST DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL 
DEBATE RIGHT HERE ON NBC.
>> LAST NIGHT U.S. IMMIGRATION 
POLICY DOMINATED THE DEBATE 
STAGE, BUT TONIGHT WE EXPECT TO 
HEAR MUCH MORE ON FOREIGN 
POLICY, ESPECIALLY AS THE SENATE
PREPARES TO TAKE UP A BILL ON 
WHETHER CONGRESS SHOULD APPROVE 
A STRIKE ON IRAN.
HERE TO DIVE INTO THE FOREIGN 
POLICY PLATFORM TONIGHT WE HAVE 
OUR GUESTS BACK WITH US ALONG 
WITH THE FORMER SPOKESPERSON FOR
THE U.S. MISSION TO THE U.N.
THANK YOU ALL SO MUCH FOR 
JOINING US.

English: 
SO LET'S JUMP IN.
SATURDAY WE EXPECT TO SEE THE 
MEETING BETWEEN PRESIDENT TRUMP 
AND PRESIDENT XI OF CHINA, CAN 
THE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES PROVE 
THAT THEY ARE STILL TOUGH ON 
CHINA AND ALSO PROVE THAT THEY 
ARE NOT DIRECTLY ALIGNED WITH 
PRESIDENT TRUMP?
>> THEY HAVE BEEN PRETTY SILENT 
ON FOREIGN POLICY IN GENERAL.
THEY HAVEN'T GONE TO PUT OUT A 
LOT OF FOREIGN POLICY, AND I 
THINK IT'S BECAUSE THEY CANNOT 
DIFFERENTIATE THEMSELVES 
STRONGLY FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP.
I MEAN, I THINK THEY WISH THEY 
COULD, BUT CERTAINLY WHEN IT 
COMES TO CHINA A LOT OF THEM 
FEEL THAT THE UNITED STATES 
SHOULD BE TOUGH ON CHINA.
I THINK THAT THEY WOULD PROBABLY
GO ABOUT IT A DIFFERENT WAY, BUT
THEY ARE NOT GIVING US DETAILS 
ON HOW -- ON WHAT THEIR PLANS 
WOULD BE, HOW THEY WOULD LIKE TO
GO WHEN IT COMES TO CHINA 
SPECIFICALLY.
HOW THEY WOULD GO IN A TOUGHER 
MANNER, AND I THINK THAT GOES 
ACROSS THE BOARD WHETHER IT'S 
IRAN AND RUSSIA IN GENERAL. 
>> SO WE'RE MISSING THE TACTICS.
>> YOU'RE NODDING YOUR HEAD. 
>> THAT'S TRUE.
>> THE DEMOCRATS HAVE NOT REALLY
FOCUSED ON FOREIGN POLICY.

English: 
>> THIS EARLY IN THE PRIMACY 
VOTERS AREN'T FOCUSING IN.
YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THE ECONOMY
AND THINGS LIKE THAT, KITCHEN 
TABLE ISSUES AND WHEN YOU'RE 
TALKING ABOUT ISSUES LIKE IRAN, 
IF YOU'RE WAKING UP IN THE 
MORNING AND YOU'RE SEEING THAT 
PUSH NOTIFICATION THAT SAYS WE 
WERE GOING TO BOMB THEM AND 
CHANGED OUR MINDS AT THE LAST 
MINUTE THAT CAN BE REAL 
CONCERNING AND I DO WANT TO HEAR
DEMOCRATS BE SPECIFIC ABOUT WHAT
THEY ARE GOING TO DO THAT IS 
DIFFERENT FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP 
AND NOT JUST PRESIDENT TRUMP'S 
RHETORIC BUT HIS ACTUAL 
ADMINISTRATION'S POLICY BECAUSE 
THOSE TWO THINGS ARE DIFFERENT. 
>> WE'VE HEARD SOME SPECIFICS 
THOUGH.
JOE BIDEN SAID THAT CHINA WAS 
NOT DIRECT COMPETITION AND THEN 
WE SAW BERNIE SANDERS SAY, WAIT 
A MINUTE, UNTRUE.
IT'S ABSOLUTELY AN ECONOMIC 
COMPETITION.
WHICH OF THOSE MESSAGES DO YOU 
THINK IS GOING TO WIN OUT AND 
PLAY BEST WITH VOTERS TONIGHT?
>> I THINK FOR THE DEMOCRATS IF 
THEY FOCUS ON INTELLECTUAL 
PROPERTY, THAT'S A BIG THING 
THAT I THINK YOU CAN DISTINGUISH
YOURSELF FROM THE PRESIDENT.
YOU ALSO LOOK AT CHINA AND LOOK 
AT WHAT THEY ARE DOING AND 
ESSENTIALLY IN OUR OWN BACKYARD 
IN SOUTH AMERICA, GIVING OUT 
ZERO FREE INTEREST LOANS, LIKE 
WHAT THEY ARE DOING IN SOUTH 
AFRICA.

English: 
THERE ARE VERY NUANCED WAYS TO 
SORT OF MAKE A CLEAR DISTINCTION
FROM WHAT WE'VE SEEN FROM THE 
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION AND AS IT 
RELATES TO IRAN STABILITY.
DON'T TRUMP FOR ME, VOTE FOR ME 
BECAUSE I THINK I'LL BRING 
STABILITY. 
>> THAT'S WHAT THEY COULD SAY 
BUT THEY ARE NOT. 
>> RIGHT. 
>> ON CHINA, THIS WOULD BE AN 
EASY ONE TO SAY THAT CHINA, 
BECAUSE OF THE TARIFFS THAT 
WE'RE IMPOSING, THAT ARE HURTING
AMERICAN COMPANIES AND AMERICAN 
CONSUMERS, THE CHINESE ARE GOING
AROUND AND DOING BUSINESS WITH 
EVERYONE ELSE.
WE SHOULD HAVE ALLIES AROUND THE
WORLD SAYING LET'S WORK TOGETHER
TO CONFRONT CHINA SO THE 
DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES COULD SAY 
THAT, BUT THEY ARE NOT SAYING, 
THAT AND I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND
WHY. 
>> IT'S A LITTLE SURPRISING TO 
SEE HOW LIGHT EVERYONE WAS ON 
FOREIGN POLICY. 
>> RIGHT. 
>> BUT DO YOU THINK WHEN WE 
BRING IT BACK HOME TO DOMESTIC 
ISSUES THAT WILL CHANGE THINGS?
FOR EXAMPLE, WE KNOW ROBERT 
MUELLER JUST DECIDED HE WAS IN 
FACT GOING TO TESTIFY.
DO YOU THINK THAT WILL CHANGE 
THE CONVERSATION AROUND THE 
MUELLER REPORT OR EVEN RUSSIA'S 
ROLE IN THE 2016 ELECTION?
>> AND IT SHOULD CHANGE THE 
CONVERSATION, I'M SURPRISED THAT

English: 
RUSSIA DIDN'T COME UP.
BILL de BLASIO WAS THE ONLY ONE 
WHO MENTIONED RUSSIA, AND WE 
IMMEDIATE TO BE TALKING ABOUT 
RUSSIA.
THEY ARE STILL BOT ARMIES TRYING
TO INFILTRATE OUR ELECTIONS AND 
STILL DOING THE SAME THINGS THEY
ARE DOING IN 2016.
NEED TO BE VERY VIGILANT AND 
PRESIDENT TRUMP DOESN'T BELIEVE 
THEY REALLY DID IT SO HE HASN'T 
PUT FORWARD ANY POLICY.
THAT'S AN OPENING THAT WOULD TIE
TOGETHER DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN 
POLICY BY SAYING THIS IS WHAT 
I'M GOING TO DO TO ENSURE THAT 
OUR ELECTION SYSTEMS ARE 
PROTECTED.
>> I THINK DEMOCRATS NEED TO BE 
CAREFUL WITH THE IMPEACHMENT 
NOTION AND I'M TELL YOU WHY, OF 
THE 61 SEATS THAT THEY WON IN 
2018, 42, 43 WERE FROM 
REPUBLICAN PREVIOUSLY HELD 
DISTRICTS, DISTRICTS THAT DONALD
TRUMP WON.
"THE WASHINGTON POST" A MONTH 
AGO DID A GREAT PROFILE PIECE ON
SOME OF THOSE MEMBERS AND WHAT 
THEY SAID IS MOST CONSTITUENTS 
IN THEIR DISTRICTS ARE NOT 
TALKING ABOUT IMPEACHING TRUMP.
THEY DON'T EVEN WANT TO HEAR 
THAT WHICH IS WHY I THINK NANCY 
PELOSI HAS BEEN VERY, VERY 

English: 
CAREFUL BECAUSE SHE DOESN'T WANT
TO RISK LOSING HER MAJORITY SO I
THINK IT'S GREAT TO SAY THAT FOR
THE BASE OF THE PARTY, BUT THEY 
NEED TO BE VERY, VERY CAREFUL 
ABOUT SOME OF THOSE OTHER AREAS 
THAT THEY WON IN 2018 THAT I 
WOULD ARGUE THAT THEY NEED IN 
2020 IF THEY PLAN TO BEAT DONALD
TRUMP. 
>> I DON'T THINK THAT'S A PUSH 
RIGHT NOW FOR THE MAJORITY OF 
THEM, THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY EVEN 
THE ONES IN CONGRESS IS FOR 
IMPEACHMENT.
THERE ARE 80 OR SO DEMOCRATS ON 
THE RECORD SAYING THEY ARE 
CALLING FOR IMPEACHMENT.
THE NUMBER IS GOING UP, BUT 
THAT'S LESS THAN HALF THE 
CAUCUS.
THAT'S NOT THE MAIN FOCUS OF THE
CONVERSATION, THE LOUDEST VOICES
ARE TALKING ABOUT IT, BUT I 
DON'T THINK THAT THAT'S THE 
ULTIMATE GOAL.
WHAT I DO THINK IN THE SHORT 
TERM IS THEY ARE GOING TO TRY TO
DO IS BRING THE MUELLER REPORT 
TO LIFE AND BRING IN THE 
WITNESSES.
NOW THAT WE HAVE ROBERT MUELLER 
COMING IN.
WHO ELSE CAN WE BRING IN TO 
ACTUALLY PULL THE INFORMATION 
THAT'S ON THE PAGES THAT 
AMERICANS HAVE NOT READ AND 
INTERNALIZE AND HOW CAN WE BRING
THAT TO LIGHT AND ALMOST ACT IT 
OUT FOR PEOPLE SO THAT THEY 
UNDERSTAND WHAT OBSTRUCTION OF 
JUSTICE WAS TAKING PLACE IN THE 
WHITE HOUSE. 
>> WHERE IS THIS GOING?

English: 
WHERE DOES THIS GO?
>> WHERE DOES THIS GO?
>> IT'S GOING TO FAIL IN THE 
SENATE WE KNOW THAT 
AUTOMATICALLY.
MITCH McCONNELL IS NOT GOING TO 
AGREE TO THIS. 
>> I DON'T CARE ABOUT THAT. 
>> SO WHY ARE YOU DOING IT?
>> BECAUSE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE 
NEED TO BE EDUCATED ABOUT WHAT 
THEIR PRESIDENT IS DOING WHILE 
HE'S IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT -- 
>> IS THIS THE WAY TO EDUCATED 
THEM?
THAT'S CONGRESS' ROLE.
OVERSIGHT OVER THE EXECUTIVE 
BRANCH AND INFORM THE AMERICAN 
PEOPLE WHO NEED TO KNOW ALL OF 
THE INFORMATION THAT IS 
CONTAINED IN THE MUELLER REPORT 
SO THEY CAN MAKE EDUCATED VOTES.
>> AND GUESS WHAT I WOULD DO. 
>> IT'S NOT UP TO YOU. 
>> IT WOULD WOULD GOT BE UP TO 
MITCH McCONNELL BUT UP TO THE 
AMERICAN PEOPLE. 
>> REPUBLICANS ONLY NEED 21 OF 
THOSE SEATS TO TAKE BACK THE 
MAJORITY IN THE HOUSE.
IF THIS IS THE DIRECTION 
DEMOCRATS WANT TO GO, I WOULD 
TARGET EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THOSE
DEMOCRATS WHO FLIPPED THOSE 
REPUBLICAN SEATS. 
>> WHAT DIRECTION ARE YOU 
SPECIFYING?
I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT -- 
>> AND NANCY PELOSI WILL LOSE 
HER MAJORITY. 
>> I'M NOT SAYING DEMOCRATS ARE 
RUNNING ON IMPEACHMENT. 

English: 
>> THAT'S WHAT YOU ARE SAYING. 
>> YOU ARE SAYING IT'S 
IMPORTANT. 
>> WHAT I'M SAYING IS 
UNDERSTANDING THE CONTENT OF THE
MUELLER REPORT IS IMPORTANT.
I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT, YOU KNOW,
IMPEACHING THE PRESIDENT IS AN 
AUTOMATIC TWO-STEP DO IT AND IT 
HAPPENS OVERNIGHT.
THAT'S NOT HOW THIS COUNTRY 
WORKS.
NO PRESIDENT HAS EVER BEEN 
REMOVED IN THAT MANNER SO WHAT 
WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NOW IS USING
THE CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT 
RESPONSIBILITY TO EDUCATE THE 
AMERICAN PUBLIC ABOUT THE 
CONTENTS OF THE MUELLER REPORT 
BECAUSE -- 
>> GET OVER IT.
THERE WERE NOT CRIMES ENUMERATED
IN THAT REPORT. 
>> CRIMES, TEN OF THEM. 
>> I AGREE WITH YOU AS FAR AS 
ETHICS AND AS FAR AS THE 
PRESIDENT DOING THINGS BUT WHAT 
I'M SAYING -- 
>> IF A DEMOCRAT HAD DONE THE 
SAME THING. 
>> I'M NOT DISAGREEING WITH YOU,
BUT AS A STRATEGIST I'M TELLING 
YOU IF DEMOCRATS WANT TO GO IN 
THAT DIRECTION, THERE'S EVERY 
SINGLE REPUBLICAN AT THE RNC AND
THE HOUSE REPUBLICAN RESEARCH 
COMMITTEE THAT'S GOING TO FOCUS 
ON THOSE MEMBERS AND THEY ARE 

English: 
GOING TO DO EVERYTHING THEY CAN 
TO MAKE SURE PELOSI LOSES THAT 
MAJORITY.
THAT'S -- THAT'S -- 
>> REPUBLICANS DO THAT EVERY 
DAY. 
>> MY VIEW IS MORE FROM THE 
FOREIGN POLICY ANGLE.
YOU STARTED ASKING ROBERT 
MUELLER, HOW DOES THIS AFFECT 
OUR CONVERSATION.
I THINK THAT'S CRITICAL BECAUSE,
I MEAN, TO NO ONE'S SURPRISE I'M
GOING TO SAY I THINK FOREIGN 
POLICY IS MUCH MORE IMPORTANT 
BUT FOR THE VOTER IT'S REALLY 
ABOUT THE ECONOMY AND 
HEALTHCARE, AND THAT BEING SAID,
FOREIGN POLICY CERTAINLY NOW IS 
REALLY CRITICAL BECAUSE IT 
ENTERED OUR ELECTIONS IN 2016 
AND HAD A DIRECT IMPACT ON THE 
VOTER.
VOTERS SHOULD CARE.
THEY MAY NOT KNOW THEY SHOULD 
CARE AT THE MOMENT AND THAT'S 
WHY EDUCATING THEN IS SO 
CRITICAL.
ON IMPEACHMENT, THIS IS A 
SEPARATE STORY.
MY VIEW IS THAT IT'S A 
DISTRACTION AND THAT'S MY OWN 
OPINION. 
>> WHAT I'M SAYING IS I WANT 
THERE TO BE SERIOUS AND FORMAL 
HEARINGS BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN. 
>> BUT PEOPLE SHOULD BE TALKING 
ABOUT IT. 
>> ARE YOU KILLING TWO BIRDS 

English: 
WITH ONE STONE?
IS THAT HOW YOU EDUCATE THEM 
THROUGH THIS PROCESS OF THE 
MUELLER REPORT?
>> YOU KNOW, THERE'S NO 
LOUDER -- THE LOUDSPEAKER THAT 
THE CANDIDATES HAVE RIGHT NOW IS
MUCH LARGER THAN ANY HEARING, 
THAN ANY NEWSPAPER ARTICLE.
THEY HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY RIGHT 
NOW WITH ALL THEIR FOLLOWS ON 
SOCIAL MEDIA AND ALL THEIR 
RALLIES TODAY, YOU KNOW, THIS IS
WHY THIS IS IMPORTANT.
THIS IS WHAT RUSSIA IS DOING.
CHINA COULD BE DOING THIS, AND 
THIS IS WHAT I'M GOING TO DO 
ABOUT IT.
I'M GOING TO PUT, FOR EXAMPLE, 
MORE MONEY AND RESEARCH INTO THE
U.S. GOVERNMENT WHEN I BECOME 
PRESIDENT TO COMBAT THAT AND 
BEEF UP CYBER SECURITY AND 
ENSURE THAT FACEBOOK AND GOOGLE 
WORK WITH US TO MAKE SURE THAT 
DISINFORMATION ISN'T RAMPANT. 
>> THERE'S A LOT OF PEOPLE WHO 
ARE JUST UNCLEAR. 
>> RIGHT. 
>> WHO DON'T UNDERSTAND. 
>> DEMOCRATS HAD AN OPPORTUNITY 
TO EDUCATE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE 
OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN. 
>> HOW LONG DID WATERGATE TAKE 
FROM THE BREAK-IN UNTIL RICHARD 
NIXON RESIGNING?
>> IT TAKES A LONG TIME. 
>> A YEAR AND A HALF FROM NOW 

English: 
THAT'S HOW LONG IT WOULD TAKE IF
YOU OPEN UP IMPEACHMENT 
HEARINGS.
DONALD TRUMP WILL ALREADY BE 
RE-ELECTED. 
>> HERE'S THE THING. 
>> WE DON'T KNOW WHAT'S GOING TO
HAPPEN BEFORE MIDNIGHT.
SO I -- I'M NOT SITTING HERE AND
SAYING THAT I KNOW EXACTLY 
WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN IN 2020 
BASED ON THE STRATEGY.
WHAT I'M SAYING AS AN AMERICAN 
CITIZEN WE LIVE IN A COUNTRY 
THAT HAD ELECTIONS ATTACKED AND 
EVEN MY OWN PERSONAL EMAIL 
HACKED BECAUSE I WAS ON THE 
CLINTON CAMPAIGN BY A FOREIGN 
GOVERNMENT, I THINK THERE NEEDS 
TO BE SOME SORT OF 
ACCOUNTABILITY FOR THAT. 
>> I AGREE. 
>> AND IN THE REPORT ROBERT 
MUELLER FOUND CRIME. 
>> TONIGHT IT'S ALL ABOUT 
ACCOUNTABILITY, AND WE COULD DO 
THIS ALL NIGHT AND HOPEFULLY 
WE'LL CARE AS MUCH ABOUT FOREIGN

English: 
POLICY ON THE DEBATE FLOOR.
STAY WITH US.
>> OUR VERY OWN DR. SEBASTIAN 
BURNS WITH US TONIGHT.
WATCHING THE DEBATE LIVE FROM 
DOWNTOWN NEW YORK WITH A FEW 
COLLEGE STUDENTS FROM ALL ACROSS
THE COUNTRY.
WHAT IS ON EVERYONE'S MIND 
HEADING NOW INTO NIGHT TWO?
>> HEY, MORGAN, I'VE GOT 
BRILLIANT STUDENTS HERE FROM 
ACROSS THE COUNTRY.
THEY ARE FROM ACROSS THE COUNTRY
AND THE POLITICAL SPECTRUM.
DEMOCRATS, REPUBLICANS, 
INDEPENDENTS AND FOR A COUPLE OF
FOLKS HERE THIS IS ACTUALLY 
GOING TO BE THEIR FIRST TIME 
VOTING IN A PRESIDENTIAL 
ELECTION, SO THEY ARE WATCHING 
REALLY CLOSELY.
GUYS, LET'S START WITH THE 
FRONT-RUNNER, JOE BIDEN.
OKAY.

English: 
SHOW OF HANDS.
WHO IS SUPER EXCITED ABOUT 
BIDEN?
WOW, NOBODY.
OKAY.
WANT TO TALK TO ME ABOUT WHY, 
WHY IS HE NOT LIGHTING A FIRE IN
THIS ROOM?
>> PERSONALLY I FEEL LIKE AS IT 
RELATES TO JOE BIDEN HIM RUNNING
FOR PRESIDENT IS REALLY JUST 
SOMETHING TO CHECK OFF A LIST.
LIKE MONDAY I HAD SOMETHINGITY, 
TUESDAY I WAS VICE PRESIDENT AND
NOW WEDNESDAY I WANT TO BE 
PRESIDENT.
HE'S REALLY IN MY OPINION A 
PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE LIKE IT'S
RIGHT FOR HIM AND IT WILL BE 
INTERESTING TO SEE OTHER 
CANDIDATES HOLD HIS FEET TO THE 
FIRE ESPECIALLY HIS 
CONTROVERSIAL PAST REFORMING THE
PRISON SYSTEM THAT WE HAVE NOW. 
>> WE'RE ALL GOING TO BE 
WATCHING TO SEE BIDEN KIND OF 
DEFINE HIS POLICIES BECAUSE HE'S
FLIP-FLOPPED SO LONG IN HIS LONG
POLITICAL CAREER.
I THINK WE'RE ALL LOOKING TO 
DELIVER A SOLID MESSAGE AND SAY 
SOMETHING THAT HE BELIEVES IN IT
GENUINELY AND NOT JUST DOING IT 
FOR THE POLITICAL ASPECT OF IT. 

English: 
>> WE'VE HEARD THAT VICE 
PRESIDENT BIDEN DOESN'T VIEW 
CHINA AS AN ECONOMIC THREAT AND 
WHEN YOU GO TO A PLACE LIKE 
PITTSBURGH, THE U.S. STEEL PLANT
HAS A 1.5 BILLION INVESTMENT AND
HOW IS BIDEN GOING TO GO TO THAT
PART OF AMERICA AND SAY I'M THE 
BETTER CANDIDATE FOR THE WORKING
CLASS AND DISTINGUISH HIMSELF 
FROM THE PRESIDENT. 
>> SOUNDS LIKE HE'S NOT REALLY 
RESONATING BOTH WITH POLICY AND 
WITH MESSAGING.
I MEAN, ONE OF THE REASONS SOME 
PEOPLE ARE MORE EXCITED ABOUT 
HIM, ARE MORE EXCITED ABOUT HIM 
IS BECAUSE OF THE LONG TRACK 
RECORD HE HAS AND THE KIND OF 
EXPERIENCE THAT HE HAS.
SOMEONE WHO IS ALSO A 
FRONT-RUNNER ON THE STABLE WHO 
HAS THE LEAST GOVERNMENT 
EXPERIENCE IS PUT BUTTIGIEG.
THINKING ABOUT THOSE TWO, 
THERE'S ABOUT A 40-YEAR AGE GAP 
BETWEEN THE TWO OF THEM AND THAT
SAYS A LOT ABOUT EXPERIENCE AND 
PERSPECTIVE.
THERE'S A LOT OF DIFFERENCES 
THERE.
WHAT'S RESONATING MORE WITH YOU 
GUYS?
A LOT OF YOU MORE WERE EXCITED 
ABOUT BUTTIGIEG.
WHY IS THAT SOMETHING THAT GETS 
YOU GOING?

English: 
>> WELL, I MEAN, YEAH.
NOT ONLY BECAUSE HE'S YOUNG BUT 
BECAUSE HE'S BRING IDEAS.
THE REASON WHY I THINK BIDEN HAS
A BIG TEST, HE'S NOT BRING NEW 
AND EXCITING INNOVATIVE IDEAS.
YES, HE'S YOUNG BUT HE'S GOING 
TO BRING NEW IDEAS AND THAT'S 
WHAT WE WANT TO SEE.
WE WANT TO SEE TAX REFORM AND 
REFORM OF THE PRISON SYSTEM AND 
WITH BIDEN THE CONVERSATION HAS 
NEVER BEEN ABOUT REFORM, KEEPING
THINGS HOW THEY ARE AND JUST 
TWEAKING THEM A LITTLE BIT AND 
WE DON'T WANT TO SEE A LITTLE 
BIT OF TWEAK.
THIS IS GOING TO BE OUR FUTURE 
SO FOR US IT'S REALLY KEY TO 
FIND CANDIDATES WHO ARE ACTUALLY
GOING TO TALK ABOUT INNOVATION 
AND HOW THEY WILL HAVE AN EFFECT
IN THREE YEARS AND TWO YEARS 
WHEN THEY ARE ALREADY EFFECTED 
AND WE'LL SEAT RIPPLE EFFECT. 
>> AND THERE'S THE PERSPECTIVE 
GAP BETWEEN BUTTIGIEG AND BIDEN 
AND BERNIE SANDERS AND JOE BIDEN
ARE NOT THAT DIFFERENT IN AGE 
AND YOU SEEM TO VIEW HIM PRETTY 
DIFFERENTLY.
CAN YOU TALK ABOUT BERNIE 
SANDERS AND WHY HE'S RESONATING 

English: 
IN A WAY THAT MAYBE BIDEN ISN'T.
>> BERNIE SANDERS IS HIGH ENERGY
AND USES SOCIAL MEDIA WELL AND 
REACHES OUT TO YOUNGER VOTER 
BASES REALLY WELL.
JUST SOMEONE I THINK NO MATTER 
WHAT AGE YOU ARE YOU CAN KIND OF
CONNECT WITH HIM AND SEE ALL THE
WORK HE'S DONE HIS WHOLE LIFE.
HE'S SOMEONE WHO HAS PUSHED AND 
PUSHED AND PUSHED AND HE'S KIND 
OF AT THIS POINT NOW WHERE, 
YEAH, HE'S OLD BUT HE CERTAINLY 
DOESN'T ACT OLD EVEN THOUGH HE'S
BEEN THROUGH SO MUCH. 
>> I FEEL LIKE WITH BERNIE WE 
SEE A CONSISTENT PASSION AND A 
REALLY CONSISTENT MESSAGE AND A 
CONSISTENT POINT OF VIEW FROM 
WHERE HE'S COMING AND HIS IDOL. 
>>> EVEN IF YOU DISAGREE WITH 
IT, YOU CAN RESPECT THE WAY HE'S
BEEN EXPRESSING IT FOR A LONG 
TIME WHEREAS WITH BIDEN WE SEE 
LESS OF A GENUINE PASSION COMING
FROM HIM. 
>> CAN WE TALK ABOUT THIS TERM 
DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM AND HOW IS 
THAT PLAYING AMONGST YOU AND 
YOUR PEERS?
>> WELL, I THINK THE TERM ITSELF
DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM, IT HAS A 
VERY CONTROVERSIAL TERM ALREADY 
IN IT, SOCIALISM, AND I BELIEVE 
THAT'S WHY A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE 
EVEN HAVING A LOT OF PROBLEMS AS
IT RELATES TO CANDIDATES LIKE 

English: 
BERNIE SANDERS.
IT'S GOING TO BE INTERESTING TO 
SEE HOW HE TRIES TOSS PUSH THAT 
MORE INTO A POSITION WHERE BOTH 
REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS CAN 
KIND OF COME TOGETHER AND AGREE 
ON THE ISSUES THAT THEY WANT TO 
REFORM AS WELL AS OTHER 
CANDIDATES SUCH AS AN ELIZABETH 
WARREN THAT'S ALREADY KIND OF 
STRAIGHT DOWN THE MIDDLE.
THAT'S GOING TO BE A LOT EASIER 
FOR THOSE THAT ARE MODERATES OR 
INDEPENDENTS TO KIND OF JOIN ON 
TO HER OWN BANDWAGON. 
>> IT'S ALSO IMPORTANT TO 
RECOGNIZE JUST BECAUSE THEY ARE 
LABELING THEMSELVES AS 
DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISTS IT DOESN'T
NECESSARILY MEAN THAT THEY ARE 
AGAINST WHAT CAPITALISM IS.
THEY ARE TAKING THE MOST 
EGREGIOUS ASPECTS OF CAPITALISM,
THE MASSIVE INEQUALITY AND A 
SHRINKING MIDDLE CLASS AND THEY 
ARE TAKING THAT AND SAYING WE 
CAN FIX THIS AND WE CAN FIX THIS
UNDER CAPITALISM WITH WHAT COULD
BE SOCIALIST POLICIES. 
>> THAT'S NOT NECESSARILY A 
TURNOFF, BUT YOU WANT TO SEE HOW
THEY ACTUALLY DEFINE THAT AND 
HOW IT PLAYS TONIGHT.

English: 
WELL, WE'LL BE SEEING HOW THAT 
TERM IS THROWN AROUND AND WHAT 
THESE CANDIDATES ARE PUTTING ON 
THE TABLE.
MORGAN. 
>> THANK YOU SO MUCH, AND THANK 
YOU TO ALL OF YOUR STUDENT 
PANELISTS.
WE HOPE THAT YOU STICK AROUND 
WITH US HERE.
FOR ALL OF THOSE WATCHING OUT 
THERE, STAY TUNED BECAUSE WE 
HAVE A LOT MORE TO DIVE INTO 

English: 
RIGHT BEFORE NIGHT TWO OF THE 
DEMOCRATIC DEBATES BEGIN.
>>> HEALTHCARE WAS ONE OF THE 
TOP ISSUES IN LAST NIGHT'S 
DEBATE SPARKING SOME HEATED 
MOMENTS FROM NEARLY EVERY SINGLE
CANDIDATE ON STAGE, BUT PERHAPS 
MOST NOTABLY THEY FOUGHT OVER 
THE ROLE THAT PRIVATE INSURANCE 
SHOULD PLAY IN INDIVIDUAL 
HEALTHCARE PLANS.
ELIZABETH WARREN DECLARED THAT 
SHE WAS WITH BERNIE SANDERS IN 
SUPPORTING MEDICARE FOR ALL AND 
THEN TONIGHT THE SENATOR FROM 
VERMONT IS GOING TO BE TAKING 
CENTER STAGE WITH HIS POLICY 
PLATFORM.
OUR GUESTS ARE BACK WITH ME NOW,
AND I WANT TO TALK A LITTLE BIT 

English: 
ABOUT THE SENSE OF HEALTHCARE 
AND WHERE WE ARE.
WE SAW THAT WARREN AND DeBLASIO 
WERE AGAINST KEEPING THE PRIVATE
OPTION AND O'ROURKE AND 
KLOBUCHAR WANT TO KEEP IT.
WHERE DO YOU THINK THE 
CANDIDATES ON NIGHT TWO WILL 
FALL?
>> I REALLY DO THINK THIS WILL 
BE -- I THINK IT WILL ILLUSTRATE
HOW DESPERATE JOE BIDEN AND 
BERNIE SANDERS ARE.
YOU HAVE BERNIE ON ONE SIDE OF 
THE SPEC TRURNLGS RIGHT, WHO IS 
ANTI-INCREMENTALISM AND WANTS TO
IMPLEMENT MEDICARE FOR ALL AND 
WANTS TO ELIMINATE PRIVATE 
INSURANCE, AND THEN YOU HAVE JOE
BIDEN, ON THE OTHER HAND, WHO 
WANTS, YOU KNOW, OBAMACARE IS 
ONE OF HIS BIGGEST LEGACIES.
HE WANTS TO BUILD ON OBAMACARE.
HE WANTS TO GIVE PEOPLE THE 
PUBLIC OPTION AND I THINK THAT 
REALLY CAPTURES HIS 
INCREMENTALIST APPROACH AND THAT
HERE I THINK IS WHAT YOU'RE 
SEEING THESE KIDS THAT WERE 
AGAINST THIS SORT OF SLOW BOIL 

English: 
AND ARE IN FAVOR OF MORE 
DRAMATIC POLICIES THAT CAN 
EFFECT CHANGE TOMORROW. 
>> YOU'RE CHUCKLING, WHY?
>> BECAUSE IT'S NOT REALISTIC.
I RESPECT THE KIDS AND I GET IT,
BUT I'VE WORKED IN POLITICS FOR 
A WHILE NOW.
I'VE BEEN IN D.C. FOR A WHILE 
NOW.
THAT'S JUST NOT HOW THINGS WORK,
AND I THINK ONE OF THE ISSUES 
FOR SOMEONE LIKE AN AOC SHE'S 
FOUND OUT FAST THAT THE GREEN 
NEW DEAL, JUST HOW D.C. WORKS.
HAVE YOU TO WORK IN REALITY AND 
YOU HAVE TO GET OTHER MEMBERS 
AND SOMETIMES PEOPLE IN YOUR OWN
PARTY TO WORK WITH YOU TO PASS 
SOME OF THESE PIECES OF 
LEGISLATION.
IT'S NOT ABOUT INCREMENTALISM. 
>> JOHN DELANEY HAD A GREAT 
CONVERSATION TODAY AND WENT BACK
AND FORTH ON THIS TOPIC AND SOME
OF THE BIGGEST, RICH ET 
COUNTRIES, MOST DEVELOPED 
COUNTRIES IN THE WORLD HAVE 
TRANSITIONED VERY EASILY 
OVERNIGHT TO -- ELIMINATED 
PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE AND 
HAVE CONSISTENT RATES. 
>> CANADA, THE NHS IN ENGLAND. 

English: 
>> BUT THEY DON'T HAVE THE SAME 
POLITICAL SYSTEM OR SETUP THAT 
WE DO, PARTICULARLY WHEN YOU 
THINK ABOUT THE PARTISANSHIP 
THAT CURRENTLY EXISTS. 
>> WHY DO YOU THINK IT'S NOT A 
REALISTIC OPTION?
>> I REALLY CANNOT WRAP MY HEAD 
AROUND HOW IT'S FUNDED AND WHEN 
YOU ASK, WHEN CANDIDATES HAVE 
BEEN ASKED, KAMALA HARRIS HAVE 
BEEN ASKED, THEY FUMBLE OVER 
THEIR WORDS, WELL, WE'LL 
INCREASE TAXES AND INCREASE ON 
THE 1% AND WE'LL INCREASE THE 
ESTATE TAXES.
NONE OF THAT ACTUALLY MAKES 
SENSE AND NONE OF IT TO ME SEEMS
VERY FEASIBLE FOR THE REASONS 
MENTIONED BECAUSE WASHINGTON 
DOESN'T WORK LIKE THAT AND IT 
DOESN'T HAPPEN OVERNIGHT AND I 
THINK IT SOUNDS ATTRACTIVE TO A 
YOUNG VOTE. 
>> BUT WHERE THE RUBBER MEETS 
THE ROAD, AND I DON'T SEE HOW IT
COULD WORK. 
>> IN THE SPAN OF FOUR YEARS 
THAT WE'VE SEEN THIS 
CONVERSATION DRAMATICALLY 
CHANGE, THIS REALLY WASN'T A 
TOPIC OF CONVERSATION IN THE 
DEMOCRATIC PARTY UNTIL BERNIE 
SANDERS HIT THE BIG STAGE AND 
NOW YOU SEE AOC DOING THE EXACT 
SAME THING.

English: 
IN LESS THAN A YEAR SHE'S 
REVOLUTIONIZED THE CONVERSATION 
AROUND CLIMATE CHANGE. 
>> AND EVERYTHING SHE'S 
ATTEMPTED TO DO HAS FAILED.
EVERY SINGLE THING SHE HAS 
PROPOSED.
WHAT I'M SAYING THE REALITY IS 
YOU LOOK AT THE PROCESS OF HOW 
YOU GET THESE THINGS DONE.
HOW DO YOU ACPLASH THIS?
IT'S VERY, VERY DIFFICULT AND TO
HAVE SHE IS SWEEPING NOTIONS 
THAT I'M GOING TO GET IN AN 
ELECTION ON DAY ONE AND 
EVERYTHING IS GOING TO CHANGE.
IT'S NOT REAL. 
>> BUT I THINK THAT'S WHY THIS 
PRIMARY IS SO FASCINATING, 
RIGHT, BECAUSE THERE IS THIS 
SCHISM THIS YEAR, AND I THINK 
IT'S A BIG GENERATIONAL GAP, YOU
KNOW, BETWEEN PEOPLE WHO WANT 
STRUCTURE AND IDEOLOGICAL CHANGE
THAT PEOPLE THINK TRUMP IS AN 
ABERRATION AND THE OUTGROWTH OF 
A LOT OF SYSTEMIC INEQUALITIES 
YEAHTATING TOWARDS CANDIDATES 
LIKE ELIZABETH WARREN AND BERNIE
SANDERS RATHER THAN JOE BIDEN 
THINKING THAT TRUMP IS A ONE-OFF
AND ONCE HE GETS INTO OFFICE 
IT'S BUSINESS AS SGLUSHL WHAT 
ABOUT THE COMPETITION BETWEEN 
THE CANDIDATES?

English: 
EARLIER ON WE HEARD SENATOR 
WARREN SAY I SUPPORT BERNIE 
SANDERS' PLAN.
I BELIEVE IN EVERYONE HAVING 
THIS.
DO YOU THINK SHE'S TRYING TO TRY
TO CREEP INTO HIS BASE AND PULL 
SOME OF THOSE VOTERS FOR 
HERSELF?
>> LOOKING AT THE NUMBERS SHE'S 
ALREADY DOING, IT RIGHT.
I SAW NINA TURNER ON EARLIER 
TODAY AND SHE'S MAKE THE CASE 
FOR BERNIE SANDERS, AND SHE WAS 
ESSENTIALLY SAYING HE'S THE 
ORIGINAL.
WE'RE NOT REALLY WORRIED ABOUT 
ELIZABETH WARREN BECAUSE BERNIE 
IS THE ORIGINAL.
WELL, THE REALITY IS ELIZABETH 
WARREN HAS BEEN ADDED TO ADD A 
LOT OF SUBSTANCE WHO WHAT BERNIE
SANDERS ORIGINALLY BROUGHT TO 
THE CONVERSATION BACK IN 2016. 
>> THE CANDIDATES NEED TO BE 
VERY CAREFUL IN NOT 
OVERPROMISING AND SAYING THINGS 
THAT -- THAT THEY ASSUME THE 
VOTER WANTS TO HEAR.
MAYBE THEY KNOW THE VOTER WANTS 
TO HEAR IT BUT YOU CAN'T GO 
AROUND MAKING FALSE PROMISES AND
THAT'S WHERE YOU END UP BEING 
THE TRUMPET LEFT. 
>> ALL OF ELIZABETH WARREN'S 
PROGRAMS AND POLICIES PUT 
TOGETHER ARE PRETTY BALANCED.
"THE WASHINGTON POST" HAS A 
GREAT PIECE BY JEFF STEIN THAT 
SHOWED THAT IT ALL EVENED OUT TO
ZERO THE WAY THAT ALL OF HER 

English: 
POLICIES AND TAXES OFFSET EACH 
OTHER AND THAT'S SOMETHING 
BERNIE HASN'T BEEN ABLE TO 
ARTICULATE. 
>> STAYING ON THE TOPIC OF 
HEALTHCARE, WHAT ABOUT WOMEN'S 
RIGHTS BECAUSE WE HEARD THIS 
ROUND OF APPLAUSE YESTERDAY WHEN
JULIAN CASTRO WAS TALKING ABOUT 
REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE.
WHEN IT COMES TO THE TOPIC OF 
ABORTION WHICH, OF COURSE, HAS 
BEEN DEBATED HEAVILY OF LATE, IS
THERE A MIDDLE GROUND ON THIS 
ISSUE?
IS THERE SOMETHING THAT THESE 
CANDIDATES CAN SAY TO PERHAPS 
GET THE SWING STATE MIDDLE OF 
THE ROAD VOTERS 
? 
>> THE MIDDLE INVOLVEMENT I 
THOUGHT ELIZABETH WARREN -- THIS
IS NOT MIDDLE OF THE ROAD.
I'M JUST SAYING I THOUGHT SHE 
DID A GREAT JOB IN SETTING 
HERSELF APART BY SAYING THAT THE
COURTS HAD AJEWETT KATED ON IT, 
AND THAT IT WAS LEGISLATION TO 
PREVENT STATES GOING RIGHT UP OR
EVEN PUSHING THAT LIMIT, RIGHT, 
SO I THOUGHT THAT THAT WAS SMART
AND PUTTING SOMETHING NEW 
FORWARD BUT WHERE TO GET THE 
MIDDLE OF THE GROUND?
THAT'S PRACTICAL I THINK HAVING 
SOMETHING LEGAL WHERE THERE'S 
LESS INTERPRETATION. 
>> IS THERE A MIDDLE GROUND IN 
THIS?
>> I DON'T THINK THERE IS.

English: 
I THINK YOU'RE EITHER ON THE 
LEFT OF THIS OR YOU'RE ON THE 
RIGHT.
I DON'T THINK YOU'LL FIND EVEN 
AMONGST VOTERS CENTRISTS ON THE 
IDEA OF ABORTION, PRO WOMEN 
RIGHTS OR AGAINST IT. 
>> RIGHT.
LET'S SEE WHAT THE STUDENTS HAVE
TO SAY BECAUSE I'M CURIOUS WHAT 
THE COLLEGE STUDENTS HAVE TO SAY
ABOUT THEIR OWN HEALTHCARE PLAN.
>> I KNOW YOU HAVE YOUR PANEL OF
STUDENTS THERE TONIGHT.
I WANTED TO ASK SOMETHING THAT I
HEARD THEM SAY IN THE LAST 
SEGMENT.
IT SEEMS LIKE EVERYTHING THAT 
THE STUDENTS TALKED ABOUT CAME 
DOWN TO AUTHENTICITY.
THIS IS A QUICK LIGHTNING ROUND.
WHICH CANDIDATE DOES EACH 
STUDENT BLEACH IS MOTOR 
AUTHENTIC?
>> YEAH, WHAT DO YOU THINK, 
GUYS?
WHO HAS MADE THE MOST AUTHENTIC 
PITCH TO YOU?
>> PETE BUTTIGIEG. 
>> PETE BUTTIGIEG. 
>> BERNIE SANDERS. 
>> PETE BUTTIGIEG. 
>> I THINK BERNIE SANDERS IS THE
MOST AUTHENTIC. 
>> BERNIE SANDERS. 
>> INTERESTING. 
>> SO THINKING ABOUT LAST NIGHT,

English: 
I MEAN, LAST NIGHT BASICALLY ALL
OF YOU SAID CASTRO SORT OF STOLE
THE SPOTLIGHT.
WHAT -- WHAT DO YOU WANT TO SEE 
TONIGHT THAT YOU DIDN'T SEE LAST
NIGHT?
WHO DO YOU WANT TO SEE SHINE?
WHAT TOPIC DO YOU THINK DIDN'T 
GET ENOUGH COVER?
>> DEFINITELY I FEEL LIKE THE 
CANDIDATES BARELY TOUCHED ON THE
ISSUE OF REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS AND
HEARD A LOT ABOUT HEALTHCARE 
WHICH IS VERY IMPORTANT BUT AS 
WOMEN WE WANT TO HEAR ABOUT, 
ESPECIALLY WITH THE LAWS PASSED 
RECENTLY, VERY HARSHLY LIMITING 
WOMEN'S RIGHT TO CHOOSE, I THINK
THAT WE'RE ALL VERY INTERESTED 
IN JUST PROTECTING OR GOING 
AGAINST THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE AND 
WHAT DOES IT REALLY MEAN TO 
MAYBE BE ANTI-ABORTION BUT PRO 
CHOICE. 
>> THAT'S AN INTERESTING POINT 
BECAUSE THIS IS AN HISTORIC 
NUMBER OF WOMEN THAT WE HAVE IN 
THIS ELECTION AND ON THAT DEBATE
STAGE, HOW DO YOU THINK THAT 
MIGHT CHANGE THE CONVERSATION 
AROUND REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS 
TONIGHT?
>> I THINK IT'S OPENING UP AGAIN
A UNIQUE CONVERSATION AS TO THE 

English: 
RIGHTS THAT WOMEN MIGHT BE ABLE 
TO HAVE OVER THEIR BODIES VERSUS
HOW ONE IDENTIFIES WITH THEIR 
RELIGIOUS BELIEFS AND HOW ONE 
MIGHT BE ABLE TO COME TO A 
MIDDLE GROUND AS IT RELATES TO 
THAT.
IT'S ALSO OPENING UP ANOTHER 
CONVERSATION AS TO THE ROLE THAT
MEN PLAY WITHIN THIS 
CONVERSATION.
EVEN THOUGH THIS IS AN ISSUE 
THAT DIRECTLY AFFECTS WOMEN, WE 
ALL KNOW THAT WOMEN ARE NOT THE 
ONLY PEOPLE THAT ARE VOTING ON 
THESE LAWS, SO IT THEN ALSO 
BRINGS INTO THE CONVERSATION AS 
TO THE POWERS THAT MEN ARE GOING
TO PLAY WHEN IT COMES TO THE 
CONVERSATION OF REPRODUCTIVE 
RIGHTS. 
>> ONE THING THAT I ALSO LOVE TO
TALK ABOUT AND I DON'T THINK 
WE'VE TALKED ABOUT IT ENOUGH, 
WE'VE DISCUSSED SORT OF THE 
APPEAL OF BEAUTE YEG, YOUNG AND 
INNOVATIVE AND BLOW IT ALL UP 
AND THINK OF SOMETHING NEW 
APPROACH.
WHAT ABOUT BIPARTISANSHIP?
DO YOU WANT TO MAKE ANY APPEAL 

English: 
TO THAT TONIGHT AND TRY TO REACH
ACROSS THE AISLE A LITTLE BIT, 
OR IS THAT NOT THE TIME FOR IT 
RIGHT NOW?
>> I THINK IT'S ABSOLUTELY TIME.
WEST VIRGINIA WHERE I COME FROM 
USED TO BE A RELIABLY DEMOCRATIC
STATE AND POLICIES NOW, WE WENT 
68% FOR TRUMP IN 2016.
I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE 
IMPORTANT FOR CANDIDATES TO 
ARTICULATE.
HOW ARE THEY GOING TO GO IN AND 
REACH OUT.
I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE 
INTERESTING IN HOW THEY TALK 
ABOUT BRIDGING THAT GAP AND 
MAYOR BUTTIGIEG COMES FROM SOUTH
BEND, ENINDIANA, A DYING CITY 
WHEN HE CAME TO IT AND NOW WILL 
HE BE ABLE TO BRING THAT TO THE 
ENTIRE MIDWEST. 
>> HARD TO DEAL WITH WHEN YOU'RE
DEALING WITH -- THAT'S WHY I 
THINK BIPARTISANSHIP IS GOING TO

English: 
BE SO BARN BECAUSE WE WANT TO 
MAKE SURE THAT THEY ARE ACTUALLY
ABLE TO PASS LEGISLATION.
LIKE YOU CAN BE VERY RETRO -- I 
THINK. 
>> DO YOU THINK THEY HAVE TALKED
ABOUT THAT ENOUGH ON THE 
CAMPAIGN TRAIL SO FAR?
>> IT'S ACTUALLY INTERESTING 
ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING WHAT YOU 
JUST SAID BECAUSE I KNOW THAT A 
LOT OF LIBERALS HAVE A 
PERSPECTIVE THAT AS WELL AS 
CONSERVATIVES THAT THERE ARE 
ISSUES.
LET'S TAKE ABORTION, FOR 
EXAMPLE, WHERE, YOU KNOW, IT'S 
JUST IMPOSSIBLE TO REACH A 
MIDDLE GROUND.
SOME ISSUE THAT PEOPLE FEEL THAT
THERE'S NOTHING TO COME TOGETHER
ON.
YOU EITHER ARE OR YOU AREN'T.
AS WE TALKED ABOUT, AGAIN, FOR 
EXAMPLE, BERNIE SANDERS AND THE 
TOPIC, FOR EXAMPLE, ABOUT A 
DEMOCRATIC GLOBALISM.
HOW WAS HE GOING TO BE ABLE TO 

English: 
REACH OUT TO THOSE WHO ARE A BIT
MORE CONSERVATIVE OR 
INDEPENDENT.
THERE'S ALSO CONVERSATIONS ON 
HOW THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS 
BECOMING MORE QUOTE, UNQUOTE 
RADICAL AS WELL SO WITH THAT 
CONVERSATION THERE ARE A LOT OF 
TOPICS THAT PEOPLE FEEL THAT, 
NO, THERE IS NO REASON TO WIN 
THE MIDDLE.
I WANT MY WAY OR, YOU KNOW, I 
DON'T WANT TO THE HEAR IT AT 
ALL. 
>> IN THAT REGARD I'M ACTUALLY 
REALLY EXCITED ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE
PETE BUTTIGIEG BECAUSE THEY KIND
OF SERVE AS A BRIDGE BETWEEN THE
DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISTS AND THESE 
KIND OF MORE DEMOCRATIC PARTY 
AND YOU HEAR ABOUT THE PEOPLE IN
HIS CONSTITUENCY THAT DISAGREE 
WITH HIM AND HE'S ABLE TO 
NEGOTIATE AND SERVE IN THEIR 
INTEREST.
>> THAT IS AN IMPORTANT THING, 
TOO, GUYS.
YOU DON'T WANT JUST THE APPEAL 
TO THE LEFT AND FAR LEFT.
YOU WANT TO SEE PEOPLE KIND OF 
CHANGE THE DISCOURSE AND OPEN UP
A LITTLE BIT. 
>> AND I FEEL LIKE MANY PEOPLE 
OUT THERE ARE LOOKING FOR AN 

English: 
ALTERNATIVE TO DONALD TRUMP AND 
SOME THINK THAT THE LEFT HAS 
GONE TOO LEFT, THAT THEY DON'T 
WANT TO GET INTO SOCIALISM AND 
THEY AREN'T IN SUPPORT OF THE 
RHETORIC THAT THE PRESIDENT IS 
GOING TO TALK ABOUT SO PEOPLE 
ARE LOOKING FOR A HAPPY MEDIUM 
BETWEEN THE TWO. 
>> I KEEP HEARING FROM YOUNGER 
DEMOGRAPHICS THAT THEY ARE TIRED
OF THE FIST FIGHTS AND THEY JUST
WANT SOME PEOPLE WHO CAN GET 
THINGS DONE, ESPECIALLY IN A 
BIPARTISAN WAY, SO WE'LL SEE 
WHAT THE CANDIDATES HAVE TO SAY 
NOT. 
>> ALL RIGHT.
THANK YOU.
THANK YOU SO MUCH TO YOUR 
PANELISTS.
IT'S A GREAT PLEASURE LISTENING 
TO THEM.
LET'S BRING BACK IN OUR GUESTS 
HERE IN THE STUDIO.
JACKIE, WHO DO YOU THINK STANDS 
THE MOST TO LOSE TONIGHT?
>> JOE BIDEN.
HE'S -- HE'S NOT DOING SPIN ROOM
TONIGHT AND VISIT THE CHILD CARE

English: 
FACILITY 20 MILES AWAY.
I KNOW HIS TEAM HAS BEEN WORKING
FOR WEEKS, BUT HE ALSO HAS A LOT
THAT I THINK -- THAT HE NEEDS TO
EXPLAIN AND MAYBE EXPRESS SOME 
REGRET FOR AND THOSE CONTRASTS 
WILL STAND OUT.
YOU HAD HOT WATER, TOO, THIS 
WEEKEND. 
>> THANK YOU. 
>> THERE ARE CONTESTS.
I'M NOT SURE. 
>> I THINK THERE'S A CONTRAST 
WITH PETE AND JOE BIDEN ON 
ISSUES OF RACE.
I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING YOU'LL 
SEE KAMALA CONTRAST BETWEEN HIM 
AND EVERYONE SEEMS TO BE 
ATTACKING BIDEN.
HE IS THE FRONT-RUNNER HERE AND 
HE'S THE PERSON THAT EVERYONE 
WILL BE GUNNINGOR.
>> IF I WAS VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN
I WOULD WRITE A SPEECH AND I 
WOULD GO OVER HIS RECORD AND 
HISTORY AND I WOULD ADDRESS 
EVERY SINGLE THING THAT'S 
PROBLEMATIC TODAY.
I'VE MADE MISTAKES.
I'M A DIFFERENT PERSON AND 
THINGS WERE DIFFERENT THEN 

English: 
BUTTER WHO'S WHO I AM TODAY.
I'M WILLING TO CHANGE AND TO GET
IT OUT OF THE WAY SO THAT HE CAN
MOVE ON. 
>> SPEAKING OF THOSE VOTING 
RECORDS, THE ONE PERSON WE'VE 
NOT TALKED ABOUT IS KAMALA 
HARRIS. 
>> YEAH. 
>> WHAT DO YOU THINK?
I MEAN, WE SAW WHEN SHE GRILLED 
KAVANAUGH, WHEN SHE GRILLED A.G.
BARR, HOW WILL SHE HANDLE BEING 
IN THE HOT SEAT?
>> I THINK SHE HAS THE CHALLENGE
OF HIGH EXPECTATIONS.
SHE'S, ACCORDING TO A NEWBC 
POLL, THE NUMBER ONE CANDIDATE 
PEOPLE WANT TO LEARN MORE 
B.PEOPLE WANT TO KNOW ABOUT WHO 
SHE IS, HER BACKGROUND.
KNOW THAT SHE WAS A PROSECUTOR.
THEY LIKELY THINK THAT SHE HAD A
STRONG HOPING ROLLOUT TO HER 
CAPE, VERY SMOOTH.
20,000 PEOPLE AND IT'S NOT EASY 
TO BUILD AN EVENT TO OPENING 
YOUR CAMPAIGN, SO I THINK THAT 
SHE HAS THE CHALLENGE OF 
INTRODUCING HERSELF TO THE 
AMERICAN PUBLIC FOR FOLKS WHO 
HAVEN'T SEEN HER AND PUTTING 
THAT SUBSTANCE OUT THERE TO GO 
TOE TO TOE WITH AN ELIZABETH 

English: 
WARREN.
SHE'S SOMEBODY THAT YOU HAVE TO 
SEE FOR YOURSELF IN ORDER TO 
REALLY JUDGE.
YOU CAN'T BASED ON WHAT OTHER 
PEOPLE HAVE SAID, AND IT'S 
REALLY DIFFERENT THAN WHEN 
YOU'RE IN THE ROOM. 
>> EVERYONE IS SMALLER WHEN YOU 
MEET.
EVERYONE IS SMALLER, AND 
NORMALLY YOU'RE SEEING THE 
TISSUES ON TELEVISION AND WHEN 
YOU SEE THEM THEY ARE ALWAYS THE
SMALLER, ESPECIALLY THE WOMEN. 
>> WHILE SHE'S SMALL IN STATURE 
SHE HAS PRESENCE AND IS VERY 
CONFIDENCE AND I WAIT FOR HER TO
SAY I FULLY INTEND TO WIN THIS 
ELECTION AND GETS A SPARKLER IN 
HER EYE.
NOT IN THE RACE TO RAISE HER 
PROFILE. 
>> BECAUSE I THINK SHE'S 
ACTUALLY SOMEONE WHO COULD STAND
TO GAIN TOMORROW. 
>> I MEAN, TO THE POINT THAT 
EVERY TIME WE'VE SEEN HER IN A 
SETTING WHERE SHE'S DEBATING 
SOMEONE OR SHE'S QUESTIONING 

English: 
SOMEONE, SHE STANDS OUT THE 
MOST, AND I THINK WHAT'S 
INTERESTING ABOUT KAMALA IS YOU 
THINK ABOUT BLACK WOMEN, BLACK 
WOMEN SEEING KAMALA HARRIS AS 
SOMEONE WHOLE POWERS THEM, 
THAT'S VERY, VERY IMPORTANT. 
>> TWO VERY IMPORTANT ASPECTS. 
>> I WOULDN'T UNDERESTIMATE IT. 
>> AND JUST FINALLY, ONE THING 
THAT WE'VE HEARD A LOT FROM 
VOTERS AND THAT WE DIDN'T TOUCH 
ON TONIGHT WAS THE ECONOMY.
I MEAN, SOMETHING WE HEARD FROM 
THE OTHER CANDIDATES LAUGH NIGHT
WAS INTENTIONED TO SHOW YOU HOW 
AN ECONOMIC PLAN UNDER A 
DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT COULD BEAT 
THAT OF TRUMP.
HOW COULD THE CANDIDATES TONIGHT
DO THAT. 
>> THAT'S WHERE BIDEN HAS SOME 
EXPLAINING TO DO.
BECAUSE HE DID MAKE THE REMARKS 
THAT WERE WIDELY CRITICIZED 
ABOUT WORKING WITH 
SEGREGATIONIST DEMOCRATS AND 
DURING THE SAME REMARKS HE ALSO 
SAID THAT NOTHING WOULD CHANGE 
FOR THIS GROUP OF WEALTHY 
DONORS, THAT THINGS WOULD BE 
EXACTLY THE SAME AND A LOT OF 
PEOPLE TOOK THAT TO INTERPRET 
THEY WOULDN'T BE PAYING MORE 
MONEY OR BE SUBJECT TO A WEALTH 
TAX LIKE A LOT OF OTHER 
CANDIDATES ARE PUSHING FOR AND 
THAT'S WHERE SOMEONE LIKE BERNIE
SANDERS HAS THE OPPORTUNITY TO 

English: 
SHINE, AT LEAST IN A CERTAIN AGE
GROUP POTENTIALLY BECAUSE, 
AGAIN, HE DOES HAVE A 
MULTI-FACETTED APPROACH TO 
BUILDING THE ECONOMY WITH HIS 
STUDENT DEBT PLAN, WITH HIS 
WEALTH TAX, AND I THINK THAT 
HE'S UNPARALED ON THE STAGE IN 
TERMS OF OFFERING THAT SPECTRUM 
OF POLICIES. 
>> WITH LESS THAN ONE MINUTE TO 
GO UNTIL THESE CANDIDATES -- 
THEY ARE ALREADY ON THE STAGE 
AND WHEN THEY BEGIN.
DO YOU THINK IT'S GOING TO BE 
MORE IMPORTANT FOR THE 
CANDIDATES TO ADDRESS SOME OF 
THE SHORTCOMINGS WITH THE 
EVOLUTION OF THEIR IDEAS, OR DO 
YOU THINK IT'S GOING TO BE MORE 
IDEA FOR THEM TO BEGIN WITH A 
BRAND-NEW PLAN FOR AMERICA?
>> I THINK THEY NEED TO SHOW HOW
THEY ARE BETTER THAN DONALD 
TRUMP AND DEFEAT HIM. 
>> SO TONIGHT ABOUT TRUMP. 
>> THANK YOU SO MUCH, AND THIS 
IS THE MOMENT WE'VE BEEN WAITING
FOR.
WE'RE ABOUT TO SEE THE 
CANDIDATES TAKE THE STAGE.

English: 
STAY RIGHT HERE BECAUSE WE ARE 
HEADED STRAIGHT TO MIAMI.
. 
>>> GOOD EVENING, I'M LESTER 
HOLT.
WELCOME TO NIGHT TWO OF THE 
DEMOCRATIC DEBATE IN THE 2020 
RACE FOR PRESIDENT. 
>> LAST NIGHT WE HEARD FROM TEN 
CANDIDATES.
TEN MORE TAKE THE STAGE. 
>> AGAIN TONIGHTLA WE'LL BE JOID
IN THE QUESTIONING BY OUR 
COLLEAGUE JOSE DIAZ BALART, 
CHUCK TODD AND RACHEL MADDOW. 
>> TONIGHT, ROUND TWO, MICHAEL 
BENNET, FORMER VICE PRESIDENT 
JOE BIDEN, SOUTH BEND INDIANA 
MAYOR PETE BUTTIGIEG, KIRSTEN 
GILLIBRAND, KAMALA HARRIS, 
FORMER COLORADO GOVERNOR JOHN 

Spanish: 
(MÚSICA).
(MÚSICA).
>> BUENAS NOCHES, BIENVENIDOSA
LA SEGUNDA NOCHE DEBATE 
DEMÓCRATA.
>>>  ESTA NOCHE 10 CANDIDATOS 
SUBEN AL ESCENARIO. EN EX NOS 
ACOMPAÑA JOSÉ DÍAZ BALAR, CHUCK 
TODD Y RACHEL MADDOW.
>>>  LOS CANDIDATOS YA ESTÁN 
LISTOS, EMPECEMOS. EN
>>>  TENEMOS AL GENERAL DE C
COLORADO
 JOE BIDEN, PETE BUTTIGIEG, 

Spanish: 
KRISTEN GILLIBRAND, KAMALA HA
HARRIS, JOHN HICKENLOOPER,  
BERNIE SANDERS,  ERIC SU Á, Y A 
YANG,.
 NBC NEWS PRESENTA DECISIÓN LOS 
1020, DEBATES DEMOCRÁTICO.
(APLAUSOS). 
(APLAUSOS). 
(APLAUSOS). 
(APLAUSOS). 
>>>  BIENVENIDOS.
 TENEMOS UNA AUDIENCIA MUY 
ANIMADA.
 CONTINUAMOS CON UN ANIMADO 
DEBATE SOBRE EL FUTURO DEL PAÍS.
 HABLAREMOS DE LOS TEMAS MÁS 
IMPORTANTES.
>>> HABLAREMOS DE SALUD, 

English: 
HICKENLOOPER, BERNIE SANDERS, 
CALIFORNIA CONGRESSMAN ERIC 
SWALWELL, AUTHOR MARY ANNEMA 
WILLIAM SON.
DECISION 2020, THE DEMOCRATIC 
CANDIDATE DEBATE.
LIVE FROM MIAMI, FLORIDA.
[ CHEERS AND APPLAUSE ]
>> GOOD EVENING ONCE AGAIN.
WELCOME TO THE CANDIDATES AND 
OUR SPIRITED AUDIENCE TONIGHT 
HERE AND ACROSS AMERICA.
WE CONTINUE THE SPIRITED DEBATE 
ABOUT THE FUTURE OF THE COUNTRY,
HOW TO ATTACK OUR MOST PRESSING 
PROBLEMS AND GETTING TO THE 
HEART OF THE BIGGESTF  ISSUES I 
THIS DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY. 
>> TONIGHT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT 
HEALTH CARE, ARIMMIGRATION.
WE'RE GOING TO DIVE INTO THE 
ECONOMY, CLIMATE CHANGE AS WELL.
>> THE I RULES OF THE ROAD BEFO 
WE BEGIN MAY SOUND FAMILIAR.
20 CANDIDATES QUALIFIED FOR THE 
FIRST DEBATE.

English: 
WE HEARD FROM TEN LAST NIGHT.
WE'LL HEAR FROM TEN MORE 
TONIGHT.
THE BREAKDOWN WAS SELECTED AT 
RANDOM.
THEY HAVE 60AT SECONDS TO ANSWE 
AND 30 SECONDS FOR A FOLLOW UP. 
>> BECAUSE OF THE LARGE FIELD 
NOT EVERY PERSON CAN WEIGH IN AN
EVERY TOPIC.
OVER THE COURSE OF THE NEXT TWO 
HOURS WE WILL HEAR FROM 
EVERYONE. 
>> WE LOVE OUR AUDIENCE BUT WE'D
LIKE TO ASK THEM TO KEEP THEIR 
REACTIONS TO A MINIMUM.
WE ARE NOT GOING TO HOLD BACK IN
MAKING SURE THE CANDIDATES STICK
TO TIME.
WITH THAT BUSINESS TAKEN CARE OF
LET'S GET TO IT.
WE'LL START TODAY WITH SENATOR 
SANDERS.
GOOD EVENING.
YOU HAVEND CALLED FOR BIG NEW 
GOVERNMENT BENEFITS LIKE 
UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE AND FREE 
COLLEGE.
IN A RECENT INTERVIEW YOU SAID 
YOU SUSPECTED AMERICANS WOULD 
BE,  AQUOTE, DELIGHTED TO PAY ME
TAXES FOR THINGS LIKE THAT.
MY QUESTION IS WILL TAXES GO UP 
FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS IN A 
SANDERS ADMINISTRATION AND IF 
SO, HOW DO YOU SELL IT TO 
VOTERS?
>> YOU'RE QUITE RIGHT.
WE HAVE A NEW VISION FOR 

Spanish: 
INMIGRACIÓN, ECONOMÍA Y CAMBIO 
CLIMÁTICO.
>>>  20 CANDIDATOS CALIFICARON 
PARA EL DEBATE. ESCUCHAMOS A 10 
ANOCHE Y 10 ESTA NOCHE.
 LOS CANDIDATOS TENDRÁN 60 
SEGUNDOS Y 30 SEGUNDOS PARA 
RESPONDER.
>>>  NO TODOS PODRÁN HABLAR DE 
TODOS LOS TEMAS, PERO LO LARGO 
DE LAS DOS HORAS LOS E
ESCUCHAREMOS A TODOS.
>>>  QUEREMOS PEDIRLE A LA 
AUDIENCIA QUE TRATE DE NO 
REACCIONAR.
 HABIENDO DICHO ESO, COMENCEMOS.
 COMENZAMOS CON EL SENADOR 
SANDERS.
 BUENAS NOCHES.
 PIDE BENEFICIOS COMO INTUICIÓN 
UNIVERSITARIA GRATUITA Y SALUD 
GRATUITA. USTED DIJO QUE LOS 
ESTADOUNIDENSES QUERRÍAN PAGAR 
MÁS IMPUESTOS POR ESAS COSAS. ME
PREGUNTA PARA USTED ES SI LOS 
IMPUESTOS SUBIRÁN PARA LA CLASE 

Spanish: 
MEDIA Y, DE SER ASÍ, CÓMO SE 
RESUELVE.
>>>  ASÍ ES.
 TENEMOS UNA NUEVA VISIÓN DE 
ESTADOS UNIDOS.
 TENEMOS A TRES PERSONAS QUE 
TIENEN MÁS DINERO QUE LA MITAD 
DEL MÁS POBRE DEL PAÍS.
 HAY GENTE QUE DUERME EN LAS 
CALLES. CREEMOS QUE ES MOMENTO 
DE CAMBIOS REALES Y ME REFIERO A
QUE LA SALUD ES UN DERECHO 
HUMANO.
 NECESITAMOS UN SISTEMA ÚNICO.
 LA MAYORÍA DE EL PUEBLO PAGARÍ 
MENOS DE LO QUE PAGAN AHORA.
 ME PARECE QUE LA EDUCACIÓN ES 
EL FUTURO DE ESTE PAÍS. POR ESO 
CREO QUE DEBEMOS TENER VISIONES 
UNIVERSITARIAS GRATUITAS Y 

English: 
AMERICA.
AT A TIME WHEN WE HAVE THREE 
PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY OWNING 
MORE WEALTH THAN THE BOTTOM HALF
OF AMERICA WHILE 500,000 PEOPLE 
ARE SLEEPING OUT ON THE STREETS 
TODAY, WE THINK IT IS TIME FOR 
CHANGE, REAL CHANGE.
BY THAT I MEAN THAT HEALTH CARE,
IN MY VIEW, IS A HUMAN RIGHT.
WE HAVE GOT TO PASS A MEDICARE 
FOR ALL, SINGLE PAYER SYSTEM.
UNDER THAT YESYSTEM, BY THE WAY 
THE VAST MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE 
IN THIS COUNTRY WILL BE PAYING 
SIGNIFICANTLY LESS FOR HEALTH 
CARE THAN THEY ARE RIGHT NOW.
I BELIEVE THAT EDUCATION IS THE 
FUTURE FOR THIS COUNTRY.
THAT IS WHY I BELIEVE WE MUST 
MAKE PUBLIC COLLEGES AND 
UNIVERSITIES TUITION-FREE AND 
ELIMINATE STUDENT DEBT.
WE DO THAT BY PLACING A TAX ON 
WALL STREET.

Spanish: 
ELIMINAR LA DEUDA UNIVERSITARIA 
Y ESO LO HACEMOS APLICANDO 
IMPUESTOS A WALL STREET.
 TODAS LAS PROPUESTAS QUE HE 
PRESENTADO ESTÁN FINANCIADAS.
>>>  10 SEGUNDOS, SENADOR.
¿ AUMENTARÁ LOS IMPUESTOS A LA 
CLASE MEDIA?
>>>  LA GENTE QUE TIENE MEDICAID
NO TENDRÁ PRIMAS, NO COPAGOS NI 
GASTOS ADICIONALES.
 SÍ, PAGARÁN MÁS IMPUESTOS, PERO
MENOS EN SALUD.
>>>  GRACIAS, SENADOR.
>>>  SENADOR--
 TODOS PODRÁN HABLAR.
 VICEPRESIDENTE BIDEN.
 EL SENADOR PIDE UNA RE 
REVOLUCIÓN.
 CUANDO USTED HABLABA DEL 
PROBLEMA DE LA INEQUIDAD DEL 
PAÍS USTED DIJO " NO DEBIÉSEMOS 
DEMONIZAR A LOS RICOS,.

English: 
EVERY PROPOSAL THAT I HAVE 
BROUGHT FORTH IS FULLY PAID FOR.
>> SENATOR SANDERS, I WILL GIVE 
YOU TEN SECONDS TO ANSWER THIS 
VERY DIRECT QUESTION.
WILL YOU RAISE TAXES FOR THE 
MIDDLE CLASS IN A SANDERS 
ADMINISTRATION?
>> PEOPLE WHO HAVE HEALTH CARE 
UNDER MEDICARE>> FOR ALL WILL HE
NO PREMIUMS, NO DEDUCTIBLES, NO 
COPAYMENTS, NO OUT OF POCKET 
EXPENSES.
YES.
THEY WILL PAY MORE IN TAXES BUT 
LESS IN HEALTH CARE FOR WHAT 
THEY GET. 
>> THANK YOU, SENATOR.
>> SENATOR SANDERS -- 
>> SENATOR BENNETT, WE'LL GET TO
EVERYBODY, I PROMISE.
I PROMISE EVERYBODY WILL GET IN 
HERE, I PROMISE.
VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN, SENATOR 
SANDERS HAS BEEN CALLING FOR A 
REVOLUTION.
RECENTLY IN REMARKS TO A GROUP 
OF G WEALTHY DONORS AS YOU WERE 
SPEAKING ABOUT THE PROBLEMS OF 
INCOME INEQUALITY YOU SAID WE 
SHOULDN'T DEMONIZERO THE RICH.
YOU SAID NOBODY HAS TO BE 
PUNISHED.
NO ONE'S STANDARD OF LIVING 
WOULD CHANGE.
NOTHING WOULD FUNDAMENTALLY 
CHANGE.

Spanish: 
 NADIE DEBE SER CASTIGADO".
¿ A QUÉ SE REFERÍA?
>>>  DONALD TRUMP CREE QUE WAS 
TRES CONSTRUYÓ EL PAÍS.
 ESTO SE TRATA DE LA DIGNIDAD, 
DEL RESPETO. MUCHÍSIMAS PERSONAS
DE LA CLASE MEDIA O LOS POBRES
HAN QUEDADO FUERA DE LA 
PROPUESTA. QUEREMOS SER D
DIRECTOS. DEBEMOS ASEGURARNOS DE
ENTENDER QUE PARA DEVOLVER LA 
DIGNIDAD A LA CLASE MEDIA DEBEN 
TENER SEGUROS CUBIERTOS QUE 
PUEDAN PAGAR.
 DEBEN ESTAR EN UNA SITUACIÓN EN
DONDE PUEDEN ESTUDIAR Y PUEDA 
PAGAR ESA EDUCACIÓN.
 QUE PUEDAN RESPIRAR AIRE LIMPIO
Y QUE PUEDAN BEBER AGUA LIMPIA .
DONALD TRUMP NOS PUSO EN UNA 
SITUACIÓN TERRIBLE. TENEMOS 

English: 
 THAT?O YOU MEAN BY
>> LOOK, DONALD TRUMP THINKS 
WALL STREET BUILT AMERICA.
MY DAD HAD AN EXPRESSION.
A JOB IS ABOUT MORE THAN A 
PAYCHECK.ER
IT'S ABOUT DIGNITY, RESPECT, 
LOOKING YOUR KID IN THE EYEMY A 
SAYING EVERYTHING WILL BE OKAY.
TOO MANY PEOPLE IN THE MIDDLE 
CLASINS HAVE HAD THE BOTTOM FAL 
OUT UNDER THIS A PROPOSAL.
I'M SAYING WE HAVE TO BE 
STRAIGHTFORWARD.
WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE WE 
UNDERSTAND THAT TO RETURN 
DIGNITY TO THE MIDDLE CLASS THEY
HAVE TO HAVE INSURANCE THAT'S 
COVERED AND THEY CAN AFFORD IT.
THEY HAVE TO. MAKE SURE WE ARE N
A SITUATION WHERE THERE IS 
CONTINUINGN  EDUCATION AND THEY 
CAN PAY FOR IT.
WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE THEY CAN 
BREATHE AIR THAT'S CLEAN AND 
THEY HAVE WATERCL THEY CAN DRIN.
DONALD TRUMP PUT US IN A 
HORRIBLE SITUATION.
WE HAVE ENORMOUS INCOME 
INEQUALITY.
WE CAN MAKE CUTS IN THE $1.6 
TRILLION IN TAXHE LOOPHOLES AND 

Spanish: 
MUCHA INEQUIDAD Y CONCUERDO EN 
QUE PODEMOS HACER RECORTES EN 
LOS VACÍOS LEGALES DE IMPUESTOS.
 QUIERO ELIMINAR EL RECORTE 
PRESUPUESTARIO QUE HIZO DONALD 
TRUMP A LOS RICOS.
>>>  SENADORA HARRIS.
 SE HABLA MUCHO LAS PRIMARIAS DE
NUEVO BENEFICIOS COMO LA CAN
CANCELACIÓN DE LOS PRÉSTAMOS 
UNIVERSITARIOS Y OTROS.
¿ LOS DEMÓCRATAS TIENEN LA R
RESPONSABILIDAD DE EXPLICAR CÓMO
PAGARÁN POR TODO ESTO?
>>>  HE ESCUCHADO ESA PREGUNTA 
MUCHAS VECES, ¿ PERO CUÁNDO 
HICIERON ESA PREGUNTA CUÁNDO 
DONALD TRUMP Y LOS REPUBLICANOS 
APROBARON UNA PROPUESTA QUE 
BENEFICIA AL 1% MÁS RICO?
 CONTRIBUYÓ MUCHÍSIMO DINERO A 
LA DEUDA ESTADOUNIDENSE.
 LAS FAMILIAS TRABAJADORAS 
NECESITAN APOYO Y ESTE TIPO DE 
ECONOMÍA NO FUNCIONA PARA LOS 
TRABAJADORES.

English: 
WOULD BE GOING ABOUT ELIMINATING
DONALD TRUMP'S TAX CUTS TO THE 
WEALTHY.
>> VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN, THANK 
YOU.
SENATOR HARRIS, THERE IS A LOT 
OF TALK ABOUT NEW BENEFITS LIKE 
STUDENT LOAN CANCELLATION, FREE 
COLLEGE, HEALTH CARE AND MORE.
DO YOU THINK DEMOCRATS HAVE A 
RESPONSIBILITY TO EXPLAIN HOW 
THEY WILL PAY FOR EVERY PROPOSAL
THEY MAKE ALONG THOSE LINES?
>> LET
 ME TELL YOU SOMETHING.
I HEAR THAT QUESTION, BUT WHERE 
WAS THAT QUESTION WHEN THE 
REPUBLICANSMP AND DONALD TRUMP 
PASSED A BILL THAT BENEFITTED 
THE BIGGEST CORPORATIONS IN THIS
COUNTRY AND THE TOP 1% 
CONTRIBUTING AT LEAST $1 
TRILLION TO THE DEBT OF AMERICA 
WHICH MIDDLE CLASSBT FAMILIES WL
PAY FOR ONE WAY OR ANOTHER.
WORKING A FAMILIES NEED SUPPORT 
AND NEED
 TO BE LIFTED UP.
FRANKLY, THIS ECONOMY IS NOT 
WORKINGAN FOR WORKING PEOPLE.
FOR TOO LONG THE RULES HAVE BEEN
WORKING IN FAVOR OF THE PEOPLE 
WHO HAVE THE MOST AND NOT IN 
FAVOR OF THE PEOPLE WHO WORK THE

English: 
MOST.
I AM PROPOSING WE CHANGE THE TAX
CODE.
FOR EVERY FAMILY THAT'S MAKING 
LESS THAN $100,000 A YEAR THEY 
RECEIVE A TAX CREDIT THEY CAN 
COLLECT OF $500 A MONTH WHICH 
MAKES ALL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN
THOSE FAMILIES GETTING THROUGH 
THETH END OF THE MONTH WITH 
DIGNITY AND SUPPORT OR NOT.
ON DAY ONE, I WILL REPEAL THE 
TAX BILL THAT BENEFITS THE TOP 
1% AND THE BIGGEST CORPORATIONS 
OF AMERICA.
>> SENATOR HARRIS, THANK YOU.
GOVERNOR HICKENLOOPER YOU WARNED
DEMOCRATS WILL LOSE IN 2020 IF 
THEY EMBRACE SOCIALISM, AS YOU 
PUT IT.
YOU WERE BOOED AT THE CALIFORNIA
DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION WHEN YOU 
SAID THAT.
ONLY ONE CANDIDATE ON THIS 
STAGE, SENATOR SANDERS 
IDENTIFIES HIMSELF AS A 
DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST.
WHAT ARE THE POLICIES OR T 
POSITIONS OF YOUR OPPONENTS YOU 
THINK ARE VEERING TOWARD 
SOCIALISM?
>> I THINK THE BOTTOM LINE IS IF
WE DON'T CLEARLY DEFINE THAT WE 
ARE NOT SOCIALISTS THE 
REPUBLICANS WILL COME AT US 

Spanish: 
 LAS REGLAS HAN SIDO ESCRITAS 
PARA LOS RICOS Y NO PARA LOS QUE
TRABAJAN MÁS,  POR ESO YO P
PROPONGO CAMBIAR EL CÓDIGO 
TRIBUTARIO PARA QUE TODAS LAS 
FAMILIAS QUE GANAN MENOS DE 
$100,000 AL AÑO RECIBIRÁN UN 
CRÉDITO QUE PUEDEN COBRAR Y ESO 
CAMBIARÁ TODO PARA ELLOS.
 DESDE EL PRIMER DÍA VOY A 
REVOCAR LA REFORMA TRIBUTARIA 
QUE BENEFICIA A LAS 
CORPORACIONES MÁS GRANDES DEL 
PAÍS.
>>>  USTED ADVIRTIÓ QUE LOS 
DEMÓCRATAS VAN A PERDER SI 
ADHIEREN AL SOCIALISMO.
 LO CRITICARON CUANDO DIJO ESO.
 SOLO UN CANDIDATO AQUÍ, EL 
SENADOR SANDERS, SE IDENTIFICA 
COMO UN DEMÓCRATA SOCIALISTA. 
¿QUÉ CREE USTED DE SUS OPONENTES
QUE VAN HACIA SOCIALISMO?

English: 
EVERY WAY THEY CAN AND CALL US 
SOCIALISTS.
IF YOU LOOK AT THE GREEN NEW 
DEAL WHICH I ADMIRE THE SENSE OF
URGENCY AND HOW IMPORTANT IT IS 
TO DO CLIMATE CHANGE, I'M A 
SCIENTIST.
WE CAN'T PROMISE EVERY AMERICAN 
A GOVERNMENT JOB.
IF YOU WANT UNIVERSAL HEALTH 
CARE COVERAGE, HEALTH CARE IS A 
RIGHT NOT A PRIVILEGE.
YOU CAN'T EXPECT TO ELIMINATE 
PRIVATE INSURANCE FOR 180 
MILLION PEOPLE, MANY OF WHOM 
DON'T WANT TO GIVE IT UP.
IN COLORADO WE BROUGHT 
BUSINESSES AND NONPROFITS 
TOGETHER.
WE GOT NEAR UNIVERSAL HEALTH 
CARE COVERAGE.
WE WERE THE FIRST STATE IN 
AMERICA TOGE HAVE THE OIL AND G 
INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENTAL 
COMMUNITY TO ADDRESS METHANE 
EMISSIONS.
WE WERE THE FIRST PLACE TO 
EXPAND REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS ON A 
SCALE BASIS WE REDUCED TEEN 
PREGNANCY BY 54%.
WE HAVE DONE THE BIG PROGRESSIVE
THINGS PEOPLE SAID COULDN'T BE 
DONE.
I HAVE DONE WHAT PRETTY MUCH 
EVERYONE ELSE UP HERE IS STILL 
TALKING ABOUT DOING. 
>> GOVERNOR SANDERS, I WILL GIVE
YOU A CHANCE TO WEIGH IN.
WHAT'S YOUR RESPONSE TO THOSE 

Spanish: 
>>>  SI NOS DEFINIMOS QUE NO 
SOMOS SOCIALISTAS, LOS 
REPUBLICANOS NOS ATACARÁN Y NOS 
DIRÁN QUE SOMOS SOCIALISTAS.
 YO ADMIRO EL SENTIDO DE 
URGENCIA QUE HAY EN RELACIÓN AL 
CAMBIO CLIMÁTICO, PERO NO 
PODEMOS PROMETERLE ESTAS COSAS A
LOS ESTADOUNIDENSES.
 NO PODEMOS ELIMINAR LOS SEGUROS
PRIVADOS PARA 180 MILLONES DE 
PERSONAS,.
 EL COLORADO HICIMOS QUE 
EMPRESAS Y ORGANIZACIONES SIN 
FINES DE LUCRO TRABAJARA JUNTAS.
 LOGRAMOS HACERNOS CARGO DE LAS 
EDI 
EMISIONES DE MI T METANO.
 REDUJIMOS LOS EMBARAZOS 
ADOLESCENTE NO SE CUENTE 4%. 
HICIMOS LAS COSAS PROGRESISTAS 
QUE LA GENTE CREE QUE NO SE 

English: 
WHO SAY NOMINATING A SOCIALIST 
WOULDIA RE-ELECT DONALD TRUMP?
>> I THINK THE RESPONSE AT THE 
LAST POLL I SAW HAD US TEN 
POINTS AHEAD OF DONALD TRUMP.
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE UNDERSTAND 
THAT TRUMP IS A PHONY.
TRUMP IS A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR AND
A RACIST AND THAT HE LIED TO THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE DURING HIS 
CAMPAIGN.
HE SAID HE WAS GOING TO STAND UP
FOR WORKING FAMILIES.
WELL, PRESIDENT TRUMP, YOU'RE 
NOT STANDING UP FOR WORKING 
FAMILIES WHEN YOU'RET  TRYING T 
THROWNG 32 MILLION PEOPLE OFF T 
HEALTH CARE THAT THEY HAVE AND 
83% OF YOUR TAX BENEFITS GO
TO THE TOP 1%.
THAT'S HOW WE BEAT TRUMP.
WE EXPOSE HIM FOR THE FRAUD THAT
HE IS.
>> SENATOR -- 
>> THE DEBATE WE ARE HAVING IN 
OUR PARTY RIGHT NOW IS 
CONFUSING.
THE TRUTH IS THERE IS A BIG 

Spanish: 
PUEDE HACER.
>>>  GRACIAS, GOBERNADOR.
>>>  SENADOR SANDERS, ¿ QUÉ 
RESPONDE A LAS PERSONAS QUE 
DICEN QUE NOMINAR A UN 
SOCIALISTA ES ENTREGARLE LA 
REELECCIÓN A TRUMP?
>>>  CREO QUE LAS ÚLTIMAS 
ENCUESTAS SON LA RESPUESTA.
 EL PUEBLO ESTADOUNIDENSE 
ENTIENDE QUE TRUMP ES FALSO,  UN
MENTIROSO PATOLÓGICO, RACISTA Y 
QUE LE MINTIÓ AL PUEBLO DURANTE 
SU CAMPAÑA.
 DIJO QUE IBA A DEFENDER A LAS 
FAMILIAS TRABAJADORAS, PERO NO 
LO HA HECHO NI LO HACE CUANDO 
INTENTA DE SACAR A 32 MILLONES 
DE PERSONAS DEL SISTEMA DE SALUD
Y BENEFICIA AL 1% MÁS RICO.
 DEBEMOS EXPONER A TRUMP PARA 
VENCERLO.

Spanish: 
>>>  NO ESTOY DE ACUERDO CON SUS
PERSPECTIVAS. ESTE DEBATE ES 
CONFUSO,  PORQUE LA VERDAD ES 
QUE HAY UNA GRAN DIFERENCIA 
ENTRE CAPITALISMO Y AVARICIA.
 TODAS LAS COSAS QUE QUEREMOS 
CAMBIAR TIENE QUE VER CUANDO LAS
COMPAÑÍAS "MÁS DE LAS GANANCIAS 
QUE DE LA GENTE.
 ESTAMOS HABLANDO DE TERMINAR 
CON LA VIOLENCIA ARMADA, ES LA 
AVARICIA DE LA RNA,.
 ES LA AVARICIA DE LAS COMPAÑÍAS
ASEGURADORAS Y DE LAS FARM
FARMACÉUTICAS CUANDO INTENTAMOS 
ENTREGAR LA SALUD PÚBLICA
>>>  GRACIAS.
>>>  NO QUEREMOS CAPITALISMO 
CORRUPTO.
>>>  SENADOR BENNET,  HA DICHO 
QUE ES POSIBLE ESCRIBIR 
POLÍTIPOLÍT 
PROPUESTAS QUE NO TENGAN BASES 
REALES.
¿ SE REFIERE A ALGÚN CANDIDATO 
EN PARTICULAR?

English: 
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CAPITALISM ON
THE ONE HAND AND GREED ON THE 
OTHER.
SO ALL THE THINGS THAT WE ARE 
TRYING TO CHANGE IS WHEN 
 MORE ABOUT RE
PROFITS THAN THEY DO ABOUT 
PEOPLE.
SO THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT ENDING 
GUN VIOLENCE.
IT'S THE GREED OF THE NRA AND 
THE GUN MANUFACTURERS THAT MAKE 
ANY PROGRESS IMPOSSIBLE.
IT'SHE THE GREED OF INSURANCE 
COMPANIES. 
>> THANK  AYOU. 
>> THERE MAY NOT BE DISAGREEMENT
IN THE PARTY BECAUSE IN TRUTH WE
WANT -- 
>> SENATOR, THANK YOU. 
>> WE DON'T WANT CORRUPTED 
CAPITALISM. 
>> THANK YOU.
I WANT TO BE
LI FAIR TO ALL THE 
CANDIDATES.
SENATOR BENNET YOU SAID IT IS 
POSSIBLE TO WRITELE POLICY 
PROPOSALS WITH NO BASIS IN 
REALITY.
YOU MIGHT AS WELL CALL THEM 
CANDY.
WERE YOU REFERRING TO ANY 
PROPOSAL INAR PARTICULAR?
>> WAS THAT FOR ME?
IT SOUNDED LIKE ME, THANK YOU. 
>> IT WAS YOU.

Spanish: 
>>>  GRACIAS.
 PRIMERO QUE TODO, CON CUE CONC 
CON BERNIE SANDERS CON EL 
DESAFÍO QUE ENFRENTAMOS.
 160,000 FAMILIAS EN EL 1% TE 
TIENE LA MISMA RIQUEZAS QUE EL 
E 
KINKEL MÁS BAJO.
 NO ESTOY DE ACUERDO CON LA 
SOLUCIÓN QUE PROPONE.
 EL DERECHO A LA SALUD ES ESO, 
UN DERECHO.
 CREO QUE LA MANERA DE HACERLO 
ES TERMINANDO EL TRABAJO QUE 
COMENZAMOS CON OBAMACARE Y 
CREANDO UNA OPCIÓN PÚBLICA PARA 
QUE TODOS PUEDAN ELEGIR.
 LA OPCIÓN PÚBLICA,  QUE SERÍA 
COMO TENER MÉDICO O SI QUIEREN  
SU USO SEGURO PÚBLICO O PRIVADO.
B

English: 
>> I APPRECIATE IT.
I AGREE WITH BERNIE.
40 YEARS OF NOW ECONOMIC GROWTH 
FOR 90% OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
FAMILIES IN THE TOP 1% HAVE THE 
SAME WEALTH AS THE BOTTOM 1%.
WE HAVE THE WORST INCOME 
INEQUALITY WE HAVE HAD IN A 
HUNDRED YEARS.
IN  DISAGREE ON HIS SOLUTION OF 
MEDICARE FOR ALL.
I HAVE PROPOSED GETTING TO 
UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE WHICH WE 
NEED TOGE DO.
IT IS A RIGHT.
HEALTH CARE IS A RIGHT.
WE NEED TO GET TO UNIVERSAL 
HEALTH CARE.
I BELIEVE THE WAY TO DO IT IS BY
FINISHING THE WORK WE STARTED 
WITH OBAMACARE AND CREATING A 
PUBLIC OPTION THAT EVERY FAMILY 
AND EVERY PERSON IN AMERICA CAN 
MAKE A CHOICE FOR THEIR FAMILY 
ABOUT WHETHER THEY WANT A PUBLIC
OPTION WHICH FOR THEM WOULD BE 
LIKE HAVING MEDICARE FOR ALL OR 
IF THEY WANT TO KEEP PRIVATE 
INSURANCE.
I BELIEVE WE'LL GET THERE MORE 
QUICKLY IF WE DO THAT.
IF I COULD FINISH, BERNIE 
MENTIONED THE TAXES WE WOULD 
HAVE TOIM PAY.

English: 
BECAUSE OF THE TAXES VERMONT 
REJECTED MEDICARE FOR ALL.
>> WHOA, WHOA, SENATOR.
WE ARE GOING TO TALK ABOUT 
HEALTH CARE AT HELENGTH.
FOR THE MOMENT -- 
>> I WROTE THE PART IN SENATOR 
SANDERS' BILL THAT IS THE 
TRANSITION WHICH MERGES WHAT THE
TWO SENATORS SAID. 
>> SENATOR. 
>> THE TRUTH IS YOU HAVE A 
BUY-IN OVERUT A FOUR OR FIVE-YE 
PERIOD.
YOU MOVE US TOBUR  SINGLE PAYERE
QUICKLY. 
>> WE WILL GET TO THIS, SENATOR.
WE WILL.
BEFORE WE DO, I WANT TO SAY 
HELLO, GOOD EVENING, BUENOS 
NOCHES TO MAYOR PETE BUTTIGIEG.
[ SPEAKING SPANISH ]
>> MANY OF YOUR COLLEAGUES ON 
STAGE SUPPORT FREE COLLEGE.
YOU DO NOT.
WHY NOT?
>> SURE.
COLLEGE AFFORDABILITY IS 
PERSONAL FOR US.
WE HAVE SIX-FIGURE STUDENT DEBT.
I BELIEVE IN REDUCING STUDENT 
DEBT.
IT'S H LOGICAL TO ME IF YOU CAN 
REFINANCE YOUR HOUSE YOU OUGHT 
TO BE ABLE TO REFINANCE YOUR 
STUDENT DEBT.

Spanish: 
BERNIE  MENCIONÓ QUE LOS 
IMPUESTOS QUE DEBEMOS PAGAR, 
VERMONT RECHAZÓ LA PROPUESTA POR
ESO.>>
>>>  VAMOS A HABLAR DE SALUD 
PÚBLICA EN BREVE.
>>>  LA TRANSICIÓN FUNCIONA LO 
QUE DICEN AMBOS SENADORES.
>>>  SENADORA--
>>>  VAMOS A HABLAR DE ESTO.
 ANTES DE HACERLO, QUIERO 
SALUDAR AL  ALCALDE BUTTIGIEG.
>>>  GRACIAS POR INVITARME.
>>>  MUCHOS DE SUS COLEGAS ESTÁN
A FAVOR DE LAS UNIVERSIDADES G
GRATUITAS. USTED NO. ¿POR QUÉ?
><
>>>  ESO ES MUY PERSONAL PARA 
NOSOTROS.

English: 
I BELIEVE IN FREE COLLEGE FOR 
LOW AND MIDDLE INCOME STUDENTS 
FOR WHOM COSTS COULD BE A 
BARRIER.
I DON'T BELIEVE IT MAKES SENSE 
TO HAVE FAMILIES SUBSIDIZE T 
BILLIONAIRES.
THE CHILDREN OF THE WEALTHIEST 
AMERICANS CAN PAY A LITTLE BIT 
OF TUITION.
WHILE I WANT TUITION COSTS TO GO
DOWN I DON'T THINK WE CAN BUY 
DOWN EVERY LAST PENNY.
SOMETHING ELSE DOESN'T GET 
TALKED ABOUT IN THE COLLEGE 
AFFORDABILITY DEBATE.
YES, IT NEEDS TO BE MORE 
AFFORDABLE TO GO TO COLLEGE.
IT NEEDS TO BE MORE AFFORDABLE 
TO NOT GO TO COLLEGE.
YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO LIVE WELL,
AFFORD RENT, BE GENEROUS TO YOUR
CHURCH AND LITTLE LEAGUE WHETHER
YOU WENT TO COLLEGE OR NOT.
>> I HAVE $100,000 IN STUDENT 
LOAN DEBT MYSELF.
YOU CAN'T COUNT ON PEOPLE IN 
GOVERNMENT WHO WERE HERE WHEN 
THE PROBLEM WAS CREATED TO SOLVE
IT.
IT'S THE NEXT GENERATION, THE 40

Spanish: 
 CREO QUE DEBEMOS REDUCIR LA  
DEUDA UNIVERSITARIA.
 TAMBIÉN CREÓ EN TU VISIÓN 
GRATUITA PARADA ESTUDIANTES DE 
ESCASOS RECURSOS.
 PERO CREO QUE NO TIENE SENTIDO 
PEDIRLE LAS FAMILIAS 
TRABAJADORAS QUE SUBSIDIAEN  A 
LAS FAMILIAS DE LOS MILLONARIOS.
HAY ALGO MS  QUE NO SE MENCIONA.
 DEBE SER MÁS EXIGIBLE IR A LA 
UNIVERSIDAD Y TAMBIÉN DEBE SER 
MÁS ASEQUIBLE EVITAR IR A LA 
UNIVERSIDAD
 DEBEMOS HE TENER UNA EXCELENTE 
VIDA INDEPENDIENTE DE QUE NO 
HAGAMOS ESTO.
>>>  NO PODEMOS CONTAR LAS 

English: 
MILLION OF US WHO CAN'T START A 
FAMILY, CAN'T TAKE A GOOD IDEA 
AND START A BUSINESS AND CAN'T 
BUY OUR FIRST HOME.
THIS IS THE GENERATION THAT CAN 
SOLVE STUDENT LOAN DEBT.
THIS GENERATION IS READY TO 
LEAVE. 
>>DY MR. YANG, YOUR SIGNATURE 
POLICY IS TO GIVE EVERY ADULT IN
THE UNITED STATES $1,000 A 
MONTH, NO QUESTIONS ASKED. 
>> THAT'S NORIGHT.
>> THAT'S LIKE $3.2 TRILLION A 
YEAR.
HOW WOULD YOU DO THAT?
>> I'M SORRY?
>> HOW WOULD YOU DO THAT?
>>U  OH, SO IT'S DIFFICULT TO D 
IF YOU HAVE COMPANIES LIKE 
AMAZON, TRILLION DOLLAR TECH 
COMPANIES PAYING ZERO IN TAXES 
WHILE THEY CLOSE L 30% OF OUR 
STORES.
WE NEENGD TO PUT THE AMERICAN 
PEOPLE IN A POSITION TO BENEFIT 
FROM THE ECONOMY.
IF WE HAD A VALUE-ADDED TAX EVEN
HALF THE EUROPEAN LEVEL COMBINED
WITH THE MONEY IN OUR HANDS IT 
WOULD BE A TRICKLE-UP ECONOMY 
FROM PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES UP.
WE WOULD SPEND THE MONEY.
IT WOULD CIRCULATE THROUGH OUR 
NEIGHBORHOODS CREATING JOBS, 
MAKING OUR FAMILIES STRONGER AND

Spanish: 
PERSONAS QUE HAN VETADO ESTO,.
 LA SIGUIENTE GENERACIÓN,  LOS 
40 MILLONES, QUE NO PODEMOS 
COMENZAR UNA FAMILIA O UN 
NEGOCIO O COMPRAR UN HOGAR.
 NOSOTROS VAMOS A RESOLVER ESTO.
>>> SEÑOR YANG,  SU POLÍTICA 
INSIGNE ES DARLE A TODOS LOS 
ADULTOS EN ESTADOS UNIDOS $1000 
AL MES,.
>>>  SÍ.
>>>  SON 3.2 BILLONES DE DÓLARES
AL AÑO.
¿ CÓMO PRETENDE HACERLO?
>>> ES  DIFÍCIL HACERLO SI TI
TIENES COMPAÑÍAS COMO AMAZON QUE
NO PAGAN IMPUESTOS.
 TENEMOS QUE BENEFICIAR AL 
PUEBLO DE TODO ESTO.
 SI APLICAMOS IMPUESTOS COMO LO 
HACEN LOS EUROPEOS LOGRAREMOS 
TENER EL DINERO.

Spanish: 
 PODEMOS GASTAR EL DINERO Y H
HACERLO CIRCULAR EN LA ECONOMÍA 
INTERNA. SALVAREMOS DINERO EN 
COSAS, ENCARCELAMIENTO, PERSONAS
SIN HOGAR.
 TENDRÍAMOS UNA POBLACIÓN MÁS 
SALUDABLE MENTALMENTE YO ME 
ESTARÍAMOS EL PRODUCTO INTERNO 
BRUTO.
 ES LO QUE TENEMOS QUE HACER,  
CONSIDERANDO QUE LA TECNOLOGÍA 
ESTÁ AUTOMATIZANDO MILLONES DE 
TRABAJOS.
 ESTAMOS A PUNTO DE HACER LO 
MISMO CON TRABAJOS DE CENTROS DE
AMADO, CONDUCCIÓN Y OTROS.
>>>  LO QUE DICE ENTONCES ES QUE
$1000 PARA TODOS,  PERO HABRÁ 
MÁS IMPUESTOS PARA PODER GASTAR 
ES
ESE DINERO.

English: 
HEALTHIER.
WE WOULD SAVE MONEY ON 
INCARCERATION, HOMELESSNESS 
SERVICES, EMERGENCY ROOM HEALTH 
CARE.
AND HAVING A STRONGER, HEALTHIER
POPULATIONRO WOULD INCREASE GDPY
$700 BILLION.
THIS IS A MOVE WE HAVE TO MAKE 
AS TECHNOLOGY AUTOMATES THE WAY 
MILLIONS OF AMERICAN JOBS -- 
IT'S T WHY DONALD TRUMP IS OUR 
PRESIDENT TODAY.
WE AUTOMATED AUTOMOTIVE JOBS AND
WE ARE DOING THE SAME TO RETAIL,
CALL CENTERS, FAST FOOD, TRUCK 
DRIVING AND ON AND ON M THROUGH 
THE ECONOMY. 
>>
 IF I CAN UNDERSTAND BETTER 
YOU'RE SAYING $1,000 A MONTH FOR
EVERYONE OVER 18 BUT A 
VALUE-ADDED TAX SO YOU CAN SPEND
THAT $1,000 ON VALUE-ADDED TAX?
>> THE VALUE ADDED TAX YOU WOULD
INCREASE THE BUYING POWER OF THE
BOTTOM 94% OF AMERICANS.
YOU WOULD HAVE $12,000 PER 

English: 
INDIVIDUAL PER
 YEAR.
FOR THE AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD OF TWO
ADULTS IT WOULD BE $24,000 A 
YEAR. 
>> MANY TALK ABOUT SELF-DRIVING 
CARS, ROBOTS, DRONES, ARTIFICIAL
INTELLIGENCE WILL COST THEM 
JOBS.
WHAT WOULD YOU. DO TO HELP PEOPE
GET THE SKILLS THEY NEED TO 
ADAPT TO THESK NEW WORLD?
>> WE MUST ALWAYS BE A COUNTRY 
WHERE TECHNOLOGY CREATES MORE 
JOBS THAN IT DISPLACES.
I HAVE SEEN THE ANXIETY IN 
AMERICA WHERE THE MANUFACTURING 
FLOORS GO FROM 1,000 TO A 
HUNDRED TO ONE.
WE HAVE TO MODERNIZE OUR 
SCHOOLS.
VALUE THE TEACHERS WHO PREPARE 
OUR KIDS, WIPE STUDENT DEBT WHO 
GOES TO A COMMUNITY WHO NEEDS 
IT.
JOSE, I WAS 6 YEARS OLD WHEN A 
PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE CAME TO 
THE CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC 
CONVENTION AND SAID IT'S TIME TO
PASS THE TORCH TO A NEW 

Spanish: 
>>>  SE INCREMENTARÍA EL PODER 
DE COMPRA PARA EL 90% DEL 
PUEBLO.
 PARA LAS PERSONAS QUE TIENEN 
ENTRE TRES O DOS ADULTOS SERÍAN 
EL REBORDE $6000 AL AÑO.
>>>  ALGUNOS HABLAN DE ROBOTS,
DRONS  INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL 
QUE LES PUEDE QUITAR EL TRABAJO.
¿ QUÉ HARÍA USTED PARA QUE LA 
GENTE SE ADAPTE?
>>>  DEBEMOS SER UN PAÍS EN QUE 
LA TECNOLOGÍA GENERE MÁS TRA
TRABAJO.
 HE VISTO LA ANSIEDAD EN EL PAÍS
EN DONDE LA FUERZA DE TRABAJO 
PASÓ DE 1000 A 100 Y DESPUÉS 
UNU
UNO.
 DEBEMOS ELIMINAR LAS DEUDAS 
UNIVERSITARIAS, INVERTIR EN LAS 
COMUNIDADES EN LUGARES EN DONDE 
LAS MEJORES EXPORTACIONES A LAS 

Spanish: 
PERSONAS QUE SE VAN.
 TENÍA SEIS AÑOS CUANDO UN 
CANDIDATO PRESIDENCIAL LLEGÓ A 
LA CONVENCIÓN DEMÓCRATA DE 
CALIFORNIA Y DIJO QUE ERA 
MOMENTO DE PASAR LA ANTORCHA,.
 ES EL CANDIDATO ERA JOE BIDEN.
 JOE BIDEN TENÍA RAZÓN CUANDO 
DIJO ESO HACE 32 AÑOS,  Y SIGUE 
TENIENDO RAZÓN.
 SI VAMOS A RESOLVER ESTO, 
DEBEMOS PASAR LA ANTORCHA.
 SI VAMOS A RESOLVER LAS DEUDAS 
UNIVERSITARIAS, PASEN LA 
ANTORCHA.
 PARA RESOLVER LA VIOLENCIA 
ARMADA, PUZZLE ANTORCHA.
>>>  VICEPRESIDENTE, ¿ QUISIERA 
DECIR ALGO?
>>>  MANTENDRÉ LA ANTORCHA.
 DEBEMOS ASEGURARNOS QUE TODOS 
ESTÉN MEJOR PREPARADOS PARA LA 
EDUCACIÓN.
 POR ESO NUESTRA PROPUESTA SE 
ENFOCA EN ESCUELAS QUE ESTABAN 
BAJO PRESIÓN, POR ESO VAMOS A 

English: 
GENERATION OF AMERICANS.
THAT CANDIDATE WAS THEN SENATOR 
JOE BIDEN.
JOE BIDEN WAS RIGHT WHEN HE SAID
IT WAS TIME TO PASS THE TORCH TO
A NEW GENERATION 32 YEARS AGO.
HE'S STILL RIGHT TODAY.
IF WE ARE GOING TO SOLVE THE 
ISSUES OF AUTOMATION, PASS THE 
TORCH, CLIMATE CHAOS, PASS THE 
TORCH, STUDENT LOAN DEBT, PASS 
THE TORCH, ENDING GUN VIOLENCE 
FOR FAMILIES WHO ARE FEARFUL OF 
SENDING THEIR KIDS TO SCHOOL, 
PASS THE TORCH.
>> WOULD YOU LIKE TO SING A 
TORCH SONG?
>> I WOULD. 
 ONTO THE LL HOLDING
TORCH.
WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE EVERYBODY 
IS PREPARED BETTER TO GO ON FOR 
AN EDUCATION.
THE FACT IS THAT'S WHY I PROPOSE
FOCUSING ON SCHOOLS THAT ARE IN 
DISTRESS.
WE SHOULD TRIPLE THE AMOUNT OF 
MONEY FORT  TITLE ONE SCHOOLS, 
HAVE UNIVERSAL PRE-K.
EVERY PERSON WHO GRADUATES FROM 
HIGH SCHOOL, 65 OUT OF A HUNDRED
NEED SOMETHING10 BEYOND HIGH 

Spanish: 
TRIPLICAR EL PRESUPUESTO, VAMOS 
A TENER FINANCIAMIENTO 
UNIVERSITARIO,  POR ESO 64 DE 
100 PERSONAS NECESITAN ALGO MÁS 
QUE LA EDUCACIÓN SECUNDARIA.
 NECESITAMOS TENER  UNIV
UNIVERSIDADES ALTERNATIVAS 
GRATIS,.
 DEBEMOS HACER QUE LAS PERSONAS 
QUE GANAN MENOS DE $25,000 NO 
PAGUE SU PRÉSTAMO UNIVERSITARIO.
 AMIGOS, PODEMOS HACER MUCHAS 
COSAS, PERO DEBEMOS HACER QUE LA
EDUCACIÓN CONTINUA ESTÉ 
DISPONIBLE PARA TODOS PARA QUE 
TODOS PUEDAN SER COMPETITIVOS EN
EL SIGLO XXI.
>>
"

English: 
SCHOOL.
WE SHOULD PROVIDE FOR THEM TO 
GET THE EDUCATION.
HAVE ANYONE HAVE TO PAY BACK 
STUDENT DEBT WHEN THEY GET BACK 
MAKING LESS THAN $25,000 A YEAR.
THEIR DEBT IS FROZEN, NO 
INTEREST PAYMENT UNTIL THEY GET 
BEYOND THAT.
WE CAN'T PUT PEOPLE IN A 
POSITION WHERE THEY CAN'T MOVE 
ON.ON
THERE IS A LOT WE CAN DO.
WE HAVE TOLK MAKE CONTINUING 
EDUCATION AVAILABLE FOR 
EVERYONE.
EVERYONE CAN COMPETE IN THE 21st
CENTURY.
WE ARE NOT DOING THAT NOW.
>> AS THE YOUNGEST GUY ON THE 
STAGE I SHOULD CONTRIBUTE TO THE
GENERATION COMMENT.
>> BEFORE WE MOVE ON -- 
[ SPEAKING SIMULTANEOUSLY ]

Spanish: 
( HABLAN TODOS).
>>>  POR FAVOR.
>>>  DEBEMOS VER QUIÉN TIENE LAS
AGALLAS PARA ENFRENTAR A WALL 
STREET,  A LOS GRANDES INTERESES
ECONÓMICOS QUE TIENEN UNA GRAN 
INFLUENCIA EN LA CLASE POLÍTICA 
Y ECONÓMICA DEL PAÍS.
(HABLAN TODOS).
(HABLAN TODOS).
>>>  VAMOS A DEJAR QUE TODOS 
HABLEN.
 SENADORA HARRIS.
>>>  ESTADOS UNIDOS NO QUIERE 
VER UNA PELEA,  SINO QUIEREN 
SABER QUÉ HAREMOS PARA DARLES LO
QUE QUIEREN.
(APLAUSOS). 
(APLAUSOS). 
(APLAUSOS). 
>>>  HABLANDO DE ESO, PARTE DE 
LO QUE ESTÁ EN JUEGO EN EL PAÍS 
HOY EN DÍA,  SON PERSONAS QUE 

English: 
>> -- TO TAKE ON THE FOSSIL FUEL
INDUSTRY, TO TAKE ON THE BIG 
MONEY INTERESTS WHO HAVE 
UNBELIEVABLE INFLUENCE OVER THE 
ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL LIFE OF 
THIS  TCOUNTRY.
>> SENATOR HARRIS -- 
>> I'M SORRY.
WE WILL LET YOU ALL SPEAK.
SENATOR HARRIS.
>> HEY, GUYS, YOU KNOW WHAT?
AMERICA DOESN'T WANT TO WITNESS 
A FOOD FIGHT.
THEY WANT TO KNOW HOW WE'LL PUT 
FOOD ON THE TABLE.
[ CHEERS AND APPLAUSE ]
ON THAT POINT PART OF THE ISSUE 
IN AMERICA TODAY AND WE HAVE 
BEEN TRAVELING THE COUNTRY.
I CERTAINLY HAVE.
I'M MEETING PEOPLE WORKING TWO, 
THREE JOBS.
THIS PRESIDENT WALKS AROUND 
TALKING ABOUT AND FLOUTING HIS 
GREAT ECONOMY.
MY GREAT ECONOMY, MY GREAT 
ECONOMY.
HOW ARE YOU MEASURING THE 
GREATNESS OF THE ECONOMY?

Spanish: 
TRABAJAN DOS O TRES TRABAJOS. 
ESTE PRESIDENTE SE JACTA DE SU 
GRAN ECONOMÍA,.
 PERO CUANDO ANALIZAMOS CÓMO 
MIDE LA ECONOMÍA Y HABLA DEL 
MERCADO BURSÁTIL,.
 ESO FUNCIONA CUANDO ESTAMOS 
HABLANDO DE PERSONA QUE TIENEN 
ACCIONES,  PERO LA MAYORÍA DE 
LAS FAMILIAS NO TIENEN.
 HAY PERSONAS QUE TRABAJAN DOS O
TRES TRABAJOS.
 SEAMOS MUY CLAROS, EN ESTADOS 
UNIDOS NADIE DEBIESE TRABAJAR 
MÁS DE UN TRABAJO PARA TENER UN 
TECHO SOBRE SUS CABEZAS Y COMIDA
EN SU MESA.
>>>  VAMOS A HABLAR DE SALUD.
 ANOCHE HICIMOS UNA PREGUNTA QUE
GENERÓ MUCHO DEBATE.
 MUCHAS PERSONAS TIENE EN SE
SEGURO, ¿ QUIÉN A BOLIVIA EL S

English: 
HE TALKS ABOUT THE STOCK MARKET.
THAT'S FINE IF YOU OWN STOCKS.
SO MANY FAMILIES IN AMERICA DO 
NOT.
YOU ASK HOW ARE YOU MEASURING 
THE GREATNESS OF THE ECONOMY.
THEY POINT TO THE JOBS NUMBERS 
AND UNEMPLOYMENT.
YEAH, PEOPLETH IN AMERICA ARE 
WORKING TWO AND THREETH JOBS.
LET'S BE CLEAR.
IN OUR AMERICA NO ONE SHOULD 
HAVE TO WORK MORE THAN ONE JOB 
 A ROOF OVER THEIR HEAD 
ANDER FOOD ON THE TABLE. 
>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
 EXPRESSED AN 
INTEREST IN TALKING ABOUT HEALTH
CARE.
THIS IS GOING TO BE A SHOW OF 
HANDS  LQUESTION.
WE ASKED A QUESTION ABOUT HEALTH
CARE LAST NIGHT.
IT SPURRED A LOT OF DISCUSSION, 
AS YOU KNOW.
WE'LL DO IT AGAIN NOW.
MANY PEOPLE WATCHING AT HOME 
HAVE HEALTH INSURANCE THROUGH 
THEIR EMPLOYER.
WHO HERE WOULD ABOLISH PRIVATE 
 A LTH INSURANCE IN FAVOR OF
GOVERNMENT-RUN PLAN.

English: 
KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND.
>> THIS IS A VERY IMPORTANT 
ISSUE.
THE PLAN IS HOW YOU GET TO 
SINGLE PAYER.
IT HAS A BUY IN TRANSITION 
PERIOD WHICH IS IMPORTANT.
I RAN IN A 2-1 DISTRICT.
I RAN ON MEDICARE FOR ALL AND 
WON THAT DISTRICT TWICE.
THEDI WAY I FORMULATED IT WAS 
SIMPLE.
ANYONEE  WITHOUT ACCESS COULD B 
IN A PERCENTAGE OF INCOME THEY 
COULD AFFORD.
THAT'S WHATAN WE PUT INTO THE 
TRANSITION PERIOD FOR OUR 
MEDICARE FOR ALL PLAN.
I BELIEVE WE NEED TO GET TO 
UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE AS AR  
RIGHT, NOT A PRIVILEGE TO SINGLE
PAYER.
THE QUICKEST WAY YOU GET THERE 
IS CREATE COMPETITION WITH THE 
INSURERS.
GOD BLESS THEM IF THEY WANT TO 
COMPETE.
THEY CAN TRY.
THEY HAVE NEVER PUT PEOPLE OVER 
PROFITS.
I DOUBT THEY EVER WILL.
WHAT WILL HAPPEN IS PEOPLE WILL 
CHOOSE MEDICARE.
WE'LL GET TO MEDICARE FOR ALL 
AND THE STEPS TO SINGLE PAYER IS
SO SHORT.

Spanish: 
SISTEMA PRIVADO A FAVOR DE UN 
SISTEMA PÚBLICO?
>>>  ESTO ES UN TEMA MUY 
IMPORTANTE. EL PLAN TIENE QUE 
VER CON CÓMO LLEGAMOS AL 
CONTRIBUYENTE ÚNICO. EN 2005, 
CUANDO ME POSTULÉ AL CONGRESO,  
LU
LO HICE POSTULANDO MEDICAID PARA
TODOS.  TODOS LO QUE NO TIENEN 
ACCESO AL SEGURO PUEDEN COMPRAR 
UN PORCENTAJE AL QUE PUEDEN 
ACCEDER.
 CREO QUE NECESITAMOS SALUD 
UNIVERSAL,.
 LA MANERA MÁS RÁPIDA ES G
GENERANDO COMPETENCIA.
 ESPERO QUE QUIEREN HACERLO, 
COMPETIR, PERO NUNCA DEBEMOS 
PONER A LAS PERSONAS POR SOBRE 

English: 
I WOULD MAKE IT AN EARNED 
BENEFIT LIKE SOCIAL SECURITY.
SO YOU BUY IN YOUR WHOLE LIFE.
IT IS THERE FOR YOU, PERMANENT 
AND UNIVERSAL.
>> SENATOR, I WANT TO PUT THE 
SAME QUESTION TO MAYOR 
BUTTIGIEG. 
>> EVERYBODY WHO SAYS MEDICARE 
FOR ALL, EVERY PERSON IN 
POLITICS WHOAR ALLOWS THAT PHRA 
TOHO ESCAPE THEIR LIPS HAS A 
RESPONSIBILITY TO EXPLAIN HOW 
YOU ARE
 ACTUALLY SUPPOSED TO GET
FROM HERE TO THERE.
I WOULD CALL IT MEDICARE FOR ALL
WHO WANTSI IT.
YOU TAKE SOMETHING LIKE 
MEDICARE, A FLAVOR OF THAT, MAKE
IT AVAILABLE ON THE EXCHANGES.
PEOPLE CAN BUY IN.
IF WE'RE RIGHT THAT IT WOULD BE 
A MORE INCLUSIVE PLAN, A MORE 
EFFICIENT PLAN THAN THE 
CORPORATE ANSWERS IT WOULD BE A 
NATURAL GLIDE PATH TO THE SINGLE
PAYER ENVIRONMENT.
LET'S REMEMBER, IN COUNTRIES 
WITH OUTRIGHT SOCIALIZED 
MEDICINES LIKE ENGLAND, THERE IS
A PRIVATE SECTOR.
FOR THE PRIMARY CARE WE CAN'T 
RELY ON CORPORATE.

Spanish: 
LAS GANANCIAS. LAS PERSONAS 
ELIGIRÁN MEDICAID, LUEGO L
LOGRAREMOS MÉDICODICARE  PARA T.
 SERÁ PERMANENTE Y UNIVERSAL.
>>>  LA MISMA PREGUNTA PARA EL 
ALCALDE BUTTIGIEG.
>>>  TODOS LOS QUE HAN DICHO M
MEDICARE  PARA TODOS, TODOS LOS 
QUE HACEN ESO TIENE LA RES
RESPONSABILIDAD DE EXPLICAR CÓMO
PASAMOS DE ÉL.  A AL PUNTO B,.
 YO DIRÍA QUE ES MEDICARE PARA 
EL EQUE QQUIERE.
 ESO SERÍA UN PLAN MÁS I
INCLUSIVO, ADEMÁS DE EFICIENTE.
 SE PASARÍA AL CONTRIBUYENTE 
ÚNICO.

Spanish: 
 INCLUSIVE EN INGLATERRA HAY UN 
SECTOR PRIVADO, PERO EN EL SE
SERVICIO PRIMARIO NO PODEMOS 
ESTAR A LA MERCED DE LAS E
EMPRESAS. COMENCÉ ESTE AÑO CON 
LA ENFERMEDAD TERMINAL DE MI 
PADRE Y NADA ME PREPARÓ PARA LAS
DECISIONES QUE TUVE QUE TOMAR.
 NUNCA TUVIMOS QUE TOMAR ESAS 
DECISIONES PENSANDO EN SI NOS 
ÍBAMOS A IR A LA BANCARROTA,.
 QUIERO QUE TODAS LAS FAMILIAS 
PUEDAN TOMAR ESA DECISIÓN.
>>>  SE ACABÓ SU TIEMPO.
 VICEPRESIDENTE BIDEN, ¿ QUÉ 
HACEMOS AHORA?
>>>  ESTO ES MUY PERSONAL.
 CUANDO MI ESPOSA E HIJA CERO 
CUENTA DE QUE MIS HIJOS ESTABAN 
HERIDOS, HUBIESE SIDO TERRIBLE 
NO TENÉS SALUD DISPONIBLE,.
 CUANDO MI HIJO VOLVIÓ DE IRAK Y
FUE DIAGNOSTICADO CON CÁNCER 
TERMINAL,  NO PUEDO SIQUIERA 

English: 
THIS IS PERSONAL FOR ME.
I STARTED THIS YEAR DEALING WITH
THE TERMINAL ILLNESS OF MY 
FATHER.
I MAKEI  DECISIONS FOR A LIVING 
AND NOTHING COULD HAVE PREPARED 
ME FOR THE DECISIONS MY FAMILY 
FACED.
WE NEVER HAD TO MAKE THE 
DECISIONSMI BASED ON WHETHER IT 
WAS GOING TO BANKRUPT OUR FAMILY
BECAUSE OF MEDICARE.
I WANT EVERY FAMILY TO HAVE THE 
SEEM FREEDOM TO DO WHAT IS 
MEDICALLY RIGHT.
>> YOUR TIME IS COMPLETE.
VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN, YOU WERE 
ONE OF THE ARCHITECTS OF 
OBAMACARE.
WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?
>> LOOK, THIS IS VERY PERSONAL 
TO ME.
WHEN MY WIFE AND DAUGHTER WERE 
KILLED IN AN AUTOMOBILE 
ACCIDENT, MY BOYS WERE BADLY 
INJURED, I COULDN'T IMAGINE WHAT
IT WOULD HAVE BEEN LIKE IF I 
HADN'T HAD ADEQUATE HEALTH CARE.
WHEN MY SON CAME HOME FROM IRAQ 
AND WAS DIAGNOSED WITH TERMINAL 
CANCER AND WAS GIVEN MONTHS TO 
LIVE, I CAN'T FATHOM WHAT WOULD 
HAVE HAPPENED IF THEY SAID, BY 
THE WAY, THE LAST SIX MONTHS OF 
YOUR LIFE, YOU'RE ON YOUR OWN.
WE'RE CUTTING YOU OFF.

English: 
YOU USED UP YOUR TIME.
THE FACT IS THE QUICKEST WAY TO 
DO IT IS BUILD ON OBAMACARE, 
BUILD ON WHAT WE DID.
SECONDLY, MAKE SURE THAT 
EVERYONE DOES HAVE AN OPTION.
EVERYONE WHETHER THEY HAVE 
PRIVATE INSURANCE, EMPLOYER 
INSURANCE OR NO INSURANCE.
THEY COULD BUY INTO THE EXCHANGE
IN A MED KARE-LIKE PLAN.
URGENCY MATTERS.
THERE'S PEOPLE RIGHT NOW FACING 
WHAT I FACED AND WHAT WE FACED 
WITHOUT THE HELP I HAD.
WE MUST MOVE MOW.
I AM AGAINST ANYONE WHO WANTS TO
TAKE DOWN OBAMACARE.
>> SENATOR SANDERS YOU BASICALLY
WANT TO SCRAP THE PRIVATE HEALTH
INSURANCE SYSTEM AS WERA KNOW I 
AND REPLACE IT WITH A 
GOVERNMENT-RUN PLAN.
NONE OF THE STATES THAT TRIED 
SOMETHING LIKE THAT -- 
CALIFORNIA, VERMONT STRUGGLED 
WITH IT AND HAVE BEEN 
SUCCESSFUL.
IF POLITICIANS CAN'T MAKE IT 
WORK THERE HOW DO YOU IMPLEMENT 

Spanish: 
CONCEBIR QUÉ HUBIESE PASADO SI 
ME HUBIESEN DICHO " ESTÁ SOLO,  
PORQUE NO TIENES COBERTURA";,
 LA MANERA MÁS SENCILLA DE 
HACERLO ES POTENCIAR OBAMACARE.
 SEGUNDO,  ASEGURARNOS DE QUE 
TODOS TENGAN OPCIÓN,.
 INDEPENDIENTE S  TIENEN SEGURO
PRIVADO, PÚBLICO, QUE PUEDAN I
INGRESAR A UN PLAN SIMILAR A 
MEDICARE.
 LA URGENCIA ES IMPORTANTE.
 LAS PERSONAS EN ESTE MOMENTO 
ENFRENTAN LO QUE YO ENFRENTÉ SI 
LA AYUDA QUE YO DEBEMOS ACTUAR .
 ME OPONGO A LAS PERSONAS QUE 
QUIEREN REEMPLAZAR OBAMACARE,.
>>>  SENADOR SANDERS,  
BÁSICAMENTE USTED QUIERE 
ELIMINAR EL SISTEMA PRIVADO DE 
SALUD.
 NINGUNO DE LOS ESTADOS QUE LO 

Spanish: 
HAN INTENTADO COMO CALIFORNIA, 
VER MANT HAN TENIDO ÉXITO,.
¿ CÓMO LO IMPLEMENTARÍA A NIVEL 
NACIONAL?
>>>  ME PARECE DIFÍCIL CREER  
QUE CASI TODOS LOS PAÍSES GRA
GRANDES DEL PAÍS HA LOGRADO UNA 
MANERA DE PROPORCIONAR SALUD A
TODOS SUS CIUDADANOS Y GASTAN LA
MITAD DE LO QUE GASTAMOS N
NOSOTROS.
 ESO DEBE ESTAR CLARO.
 LA FUNCIÓN DE LA SALUD PÚBLICA 
NO ES HACERLO PARA TODOS, SINO
GANAR MILLONES Y MILLONES PARA 
LAS COMPAÑÍAS ASEGURADORAS  M

English: 
IT ON A NATIONAL LEVEL?
>> I FIND IT HARD TO BELIEVE 
THAT EVERY OTHER MAJOR COUNTRY 
INCLUDING CANADA SOMEHOW HASIN 
FIGURED OUT A WAY TO PROVIDE 
HEALTH CARE TO EVERY MAN, WOMAN 
AND CHILD.
IN MOST CASES THEY ARE SPENDING 
50% PER CAPITA WHAT THEY ARE 
SPENDING.
LET'S BE CLEAR.
LET US BE VERY CLEAR.
THE FUNCTION OF HEALTH CARE 
TODAY FROM THE INSURANCE AND 
DRUG COMPANY PERSPECTIVE IS NOT 
TO PROVIDE QUALITY CARE TO ALL 
IN A COST EFFECTIVE WAY.
THE FUNCTION OF THE HEALTH CARE 
SYSTEM TODAYTI IS TO MAKE BILLIS
IN PROFITS FOR THE INSURANCE 
COMPANIES AND LAST YEAR IF YOU 
COULD BELIEVEIE IT, WHILE WE PA 
THE HIGHEST PRICES IN THE WORLD 
FOR PRESCRIPTION DRUGS AND I 
WILL LOWER PRESCRIPTION DRUG 
PRICES IN HALF IN THIS COUNTRY, 
TOP TEN COMPANIES MADE $69 
BILLION IN PROFITS.

Spanish: 
MIENTRAS PAGAMOS LAS P LOS PR
MÁS CAROS POR DRO FÁRMACOS.
 ELLOS GASTARÁN CIENTOS DE 
MILLONES DE DÓLARES MINTIÉNDOLE 
AL PUEBLO DICIÉNDONOS POR QUÉ NO
PODEMOS TENER UN SISTEMA DE 
SALUD PÚBLICO PARA TODOS.
>>> ¿ CÓMO SE IMPLEMENTA A NIVEL
NACIONAL  CONSIDERANDO QUE NO HA
TENIDO ÉXITO EN ALGUNOS ESTADOS?
>>>  DE LA SIGUIENTE MANERA.
 COMO SIEMPRE SE HA HECHO EL 
CAMBIO REAL,  COMO SE HIZO CON 
EL MOVIMIENTO O DE DERECHO 
CIVIL, DE MUJERES.
 CUANDO CIENTOS DE
(MÚSICA(. GUIONES DE MUJERES 
ESTÉN LISTOS DE ENFRENTARSE A 
LAS COMPAÑÍAS FARMACÉUTICAS QUE 
SU TIEMPO ACABÓ Y QUE LA SALUD 
PÚBLICA ES UN DERECHO HUMANO Y 
NO UN NEGOCIO.
>>>  UN MOMENTO.
 HEMOS HABLADO DEL ACCESO A LA 

English: 
THEY WILL SPEND HUNDREDS OF 
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS LYING TO THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE TELLING US WHY 
WE CANNOT HAVE A MEDICARE FOR 
ALL -- 
>> I HAVE TO FOLLOW UP.
HOW DO YOU IMPLEMENT IT ON A 
NATIONAL LEVEL
 GIVEN THE FACT 
THAT IT'S NOT SUCCEEDED AND 
OTHER STATES HAVE TRIED. 
>> WE'LL DO IT THE WAY REAL 
CHANGE HAS ALWAYS TAKEN PLACE.
WHETHER IT WAS THE LABOR 
MOVEMENT, CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT 
OR THE WOMEN'S MOVEMENT.
WE WILL HAVE MEDICARE FOR ALL.
WHEN TENS OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE 
AREEN PREPARED TO STAND UP AND 
TELL THE INSURANCE COMPANIES AND
THE DRUG COMPANIES THEIR DAY IS 
GONE, THAT HEALTH CARE IS A 
HUMAN RIGHT, NOT SOMETHING TO 
MAKE HUGE PROFITS WITH.
>> THIS IS A QUESTION FOR MS. 
WILLIAMSON.
WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT ACCESS TO 
HEALTH INSURANCE.
FOR MANY AMERICANS THE MOST 
PRESSING CONCERN IS THE HIGH 
COST OF HEALTH CARE.
HOW WOULD YOU LOWER THE COST OF 

Spanish: 
SALUD, PERO PARA MUCHOS LA 
URGENCIA ES EL COSTO DE LA 
SALUD. ¿CÓMO BAJARÍA EL COSTO DE
LOS FÁRMACOS?
>>>  NUNCA DEBIERON HABER RE
REALIZADO EL TRATO CON LAS G
GRANDES FARMACÉUTICAS.
 ESTOY DE ACUERDO CON CASI TODO 
LO QUE SE HA DICHO, PERO ME P
PARECE BUENO TENER ESTOS PLANES,
PERO SI CREEMOS QUE VAMOS A V
VENCER A TRUMP CON ESTOS PLANES,
ESTÁN EQUIVOCADOS.
 ÉL GANÓ DICIENDO SIMPLEMENTE 
QUE DEBEMOS HACER QUE EL PAÍS 
SEA GRANDE NUEVAMENTE. INCLUSIVE
SI SOLO ESTAMOS HABLANDO DE LAS 
COSAS SUPERFICIALES, NO TENEMOS 
UN SISTEMA SALUD PÚBLICA AQUÍ, 
TENEMOS UN SISTEMA DE ENFERMOS.
 ESPERAMOS A QUE LA GENTE EN
ENFERME Y LUEGO PENSAMOS EN Q
QUIÉN VA A PAGAR EL TRATAMIENTO 
Y CÓMO LOS TRATAREMOS. DEBEMOS 

English: 
PRESCRIPTION DRUGS?
>> FIRST OF ALL, THE GOVERNMENT 
SHOULD NEVER HAVE MADE THE DEAL 
 BIG PHARMA THEY COULDN'T 
NEGOTIATE.
CORPORATIONS HAD THEIR WAYT  WI 
US.
WHILE I AGREE -- I'M WITH 
SENATOR BENNET AND OTHERS.
I'LL TELL YOU ONE THING.
IT'S NICE WE HAVE ALL THE PLANS 
BUT IF YOU THINK WE ARE GOING TO
BEAT DONALD TRUMP BY HAVING 
PLANS YOU'VE T GOT ANOTHER THIN 
COMING.
HE DIDN'T WIN BYNO SAYING HE HAA
PLAN.
HE WON BY SAYING MAKE AMERICA 
GREAT AGAIN.
WE HAVE TO GET DEEPER THAN 
SUPERFICIAL FIXES, AS IMPORTANT 
AS THEY ARE.
EVEN TALKING ABOUT SUPERFICIAL 
FIXES, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE 
DON'T HAVE A HEALTH CARE SYSTEM 
IN THE UNITED STATES.
WE HAVE A SICKNESS CARE SYSTEM 
IN THE UNITED STATES.
WE WAIT FOR SOMEBODY TO GET 
SICK, TALK ABOUT WHO WILL PAY 
FOR THE TREATMENT AND HOW THEY 
WILL BY E TREATED.
WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT WHY SO 
MANY AMERICANS HAVE UNNECESSARY 
CHRONICY  ILLNESSES, SO MANY MO 
COMPARED TO OTHER COUNTRIES.

English: 
THAT GETS BACK TO NOT JUST THE 
BIG PHARMA, NOT JUST HEALTH 
INSURANCE COMPANIES.
IT HAS TO DO WITH CHEMICAL 
POLICIES, ENVIRONMENTAL 
POLICIES. 
>> THAT'S YOUR TIME.
>> IT HAS TO DO WITH DRUG 
POLICIES.
>> THANK YOU.
DO YOU WANT TO KEEP THE SYSTEM 
WE HAVE IN PLACE WITH OBAMACARE 
AND BUILD ON IT?
YOU MENTIONED IT.
IS THAT ENOUGH TO GET US TO 
UNIVERSAL COVERAGE?
>> THAT WILL GET US THE QUICKEST
WAY THERE.
I HAD PROSTATE CANCER AND THAT'S
WHY I WAS LATE GETTING IN THE 
RACE.
THE SAME WEEK MY KID HAD HER 
APPENDIX OUT.
I FEEL STRONGLY FAMILIES SHOULD 
HAVE THE CHOICE.
THAT'S WHAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE 
WANT.
I BELIEVE IT WILL GET US THERE 
QUICKLY.
THERE ARE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE IN 
AMERICA THAT DO NOT HAVE HEALTH 
INSURANCE TODAY BECAUSE THEY ARE
TOO WEALTHY.
THEY MAKE TOO MUCH MONEY TO BE 
ON MEDICAID.
THEY CAN'T AFFORD HEALTH 
INSURANCE.
WHEN SENATOR SANDERS SAID THAT 
CANADA IS SINGLE PAYER, THERE 

Spanish: 
PENSAR EN POR QUÉ LAS PERSONAS 
TIENEN ENFERMEDADES CRÓNICAS EN 
MAYOR TASA EN RELACIÓN A OTROS 
PAÍSES.
 ESTO TIENE QUE VER CON POLÍTICA
DE QUÍMICOS, POLÍTICA Y A
AMBIENTALES, CON POLÍTICAS DE 
ALIMENTOS, POLÍTICAS F
FARMACÉUTICAS, ETC.
>>>  SENADOR,  USTED QUIERE 
SEGUIR CON OBAMACARE Y CONSTRUIR
SOBRE ESO. ¿ESO ES SUFICIENTE?
>>> ME PARECE QUE ES EL CAMINO 
MÁS RÁPIDO.
 USTEDES SABEN QUE YO TUVE 
CÁNCER A LA PRÓSTATA.
 ESTÉ CONVENCIDO DE QUE LAS P
PERSONAS DEBEN TENER LA OPCIÓN Y
CREO QUE LO QUE  NE

Spanish: 
NECESITA.
 CUANDO SENADOR SANDERS DICE QUE
CANADÁ GASTA MENOS, HAY MUCHA 
MENOS GENTE.
 SOMOS 3 300 MILLONES EN ESTADO 
UNIDOS.
 PARA ELLOS PUEDE FUNCIONAR,  
COMO  MENCIONÓ EL ALCALDE BU
BUTTIGIEG.
 ME PARECE QUE ESA ES LA MANERA 
DE LOGRARLO.
BR3ERNIE  ES MUY HONESTO Y LO H 
REPETIDO UNA Y OTRA VEZ,  QUE 
ESTO HARÁ QUE SEA ILEGAL TODO 
TIPO DE SALUD PRIVADA, EXCEPTO 
PARA CIRUGÍA ESTÉTICA.
>>>  OBVIAMENTE EL SENADOR 
SANDERS QUIERA HABLAR.

English: 
ARE 35 MILLION P PEOPLE IN CANA.
THERE ARE 330 MILLION PEOPLE IN 
THE UNITED STATES.
EASILY THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE ON A
PUBLIC OPTION.
THEY COULD BE 35 MILLION.
FOR THEM THAT WOULD BE MEDICARE 
FOR ALL BUT FOR OTHERS WHO WANT 
TO KEEPTO IT THEY SHOULD BE ABL 
TO KEEP IT.
THAT WOULD BE  THE FASTEST WAY O
GET WHERE WE GO.
HE SAID OVER AND OVER AGAIN THIS
WILL BAN MAKING ILLEGAL ALL 
INSURANCE EXCEPT COSMETIC.
EXCEPT INSURANCE FOR, I GUESS 
THAT'S FOR PLASTIC SURGERY.
EVERYTHING ELSE IS BANNED UNDER 
THE MEDICARE FOR ALL PROPOSAL.
>> I LET YOU GO LONGER, BUT 
OBVIOUSLY SENATOR SANDERS GETS A
RESPONSE.
>> I HAVE A POINTE  HERE. 
>> SENATOR SANDERS?
>> H YOU KNOW, MIKE, MEDICARE I 
THE MOST POPULAR INSURANCE 
PROGRAM IN THE COUNTRY.

Spanish: 
>>> MIKE, MEDICARE  ES EL SIS
SISTEMA DE SALUD MÁS POPULAR DEL
PAÍS.
 A LA GENTE NO LE GUSTAN SUS 
ASEGURADORAS PRIVADAS,.
 BAJO NUESTRO PLAN PODRÁN IR A
CUALQUIER HOSPITAL, DOCTOR 
ÍBAMOS A BAJAR EL COSTO 
SUSTANCIALMENTE DE LA SALUD 
PORQUE VAMOS A DETENER LA AV
AVARICIA DE LAS COMPAÑÍAS 
ASEGURADORAS.
(HABLAN TODOS).
(HABLAN TODOS).
>>>  LA REALIDAD DE CÓMO ESTO 
AFECTA A LA GENTE ES EVIDENTE EN
UNA HISTORIA QUE TODOS CON
CONOCEMOS.
 TODAS LAS NOCHES EN EL PAÍS UN 
PADRE QUE VE A SU HIJO CON UNA 
TEMPERATURA FUERA DE CONTROL Y 
LLAMA AL 911 Y LE DICEN QUE DEBE
LLEVARLO AL HOSPITAL.
 SUBEN AL AUTO, Y SE ESTACIONAN 
FUERA DEL HOSPITAL MIRANDO LAS 
PUERTAS QUE SE ABREN Y CIERRAN 
SINTIENDO LA TEMPERATURA DE SU 

English: 
PEOPLE DON'T LIKE THEIR PRIVATE 
INSURANCE COMPANIES.
THEY LIKE THEIR DOCTORS AND 
HOSPITALS.
PEOPLE GO TO ANY DOCTOR THEY 
WANT, ANY HOSPITAL THEY WANT.
WE WILL LOWER THE COST OF HEALTH
CARE IN THE COUNTRY.
WE'LL STOP THE GREED OF THE 
INSURANCE -- 
>> THE REALITY OF HOW THIS 
AFFECTS REAL PEOPLE IS CAPTURED 
IN A STORY MANY OF US HEARD AND 
I WILL PARAPHRASE.
ANY NIGHT IN AMERICA THERE IS A 
PARENT WHO SEES THEIR CHILD HAS 
A TEMPERATURE THAT'S OUT OF 
CONTROL, CALLS 911, WHAT SHOULD 
I DO?
THEY SAY TAKE THE CHILD TO THE 
EMERGENCY ROOM.
 GET IN THEIR CAR AND 
DRIVE AND THEY ARE SITTING IN 
THE PARKING LOT OUTSIDE OF THE 
EMERGENCY ROOM LOOKING AT THE 
SLIDING GLASSER DOORS WHILE THE 
HAVE THE HAND ON THE FOREHEAD OF
THEIR N CHILD, KNOWING THAT IF 
THEY WALK THROUGHTH THE SLIDING 
GLASS DOORS, EVEN THOUGH THEY 

English: 
HAVE INSURANCE THEY WILL BE OUT 
ASU $5,000 DEDUCTIBLE WHEN THEY 
WALK THROUGH THE DOORS.
THAT'S WHAT INSURANCE COMPANIES 
ARE DOING IN AMERICA TODAY.
>> WE'LL CONTINUE THIS 
DISCUSSION.
[ SPEAKING SIMULTANEOUSLY ]
>> I WAS JUST IN THE EMERGENCY 
ROOM.
WE FIGHT HEALTH INSURANCE 
COMPANIES EVERY SINGLE WEEK. 
>> THANK YOU. 
>> WE STAND IN LINE AND PAY 
EXPENSIVE PRESCRIPTION DRUGS.
WE HAVE TO HAVE A HEALTH CARE 
GUARANTEE.
IF YOU'RE SICK, YOU ARE SEEN.
IN AMERICA YOU NEVER GO BROKE 
BECAUSE OFO  IT. 
>> OKAY.
A LOT OF YOU HAVE BEEN TALKING 
TONIGHT ABOUT THE GOVERNMENT 
HEALTH CARE PLANS YOUBE PROPOSE 
INME ONE FORM OR ANOTHER.
THIS IS A SHOW OF HANDS 
QUESTION.
HOLD THEM UP FOR A MOMENT SO 
PEOPLEQU CAN SEE.
RAISE YOUR HAND IF YOUR 
GOVERNMENT PLAN WOULD PROVIDE 
COVERAGE FOR UNDOCUMENTED 
IMMIGRANTS.
LET ME START WITH YOU, MAYOR 
BUTTIGIEG.

Spanish: 
HIJO A SABIENDAS DE QUE SI 
ENTRAN,  A PESAR DE QUE TIENEN 
SEGURO MÉDICO,  VAN A PERDER EL 
DEDUCIBLE DE $5000.
  ESO ES LO QUE HACE LA COM
COMPAÑÍAS ASEGURADORAS!
>>>  CONTINUAREMOS CON LA 
DISCUSIÓN.
 CANDIDATOS, POR FAVOR.
>>>  YO SOY UNO DE ESOS PADRES.
 LUCHAMOS CONTRA LAS ASEGUR
ASEGURADORAS TODAS LAS SEMANAS. 
PAGAMOS CARO POR LOS FÁRMACOS. 
DEBEMOS TENER LA GARANTÍA,.
 100 FIRMAMOS EN EL PAÍS, NO 
VAMOS A LA BANCARROTA.
>>>  HEMOS HABLADO DEL PLAN 
GUBERNAMENTAL QUE PROPONEN.
 LEVANTEN LA MANO PARA 
RESPONDER.
 LEVANTEN LA MANO SI SU GOBIERNO
VA A CUBRIR A LOS INMIGRANTES.

English: 
WHY?
>> OUR COUNTRY IS HEALTHIER WHEN
EVERYBODY IS HEALTHIER.
REMEMBER, WE ARE TALKING ABOUT 
SOMETHING PEOPLE ARE GIVEN A 
CHANCE TO BUY INTO.
IN THE SAME WAY THERE ARE 
UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS IN MY 
COMMUNITY WHO PAY SALES TAX.
THEY PAY PROPERTY TAXES DIRECTLY
OR INDIRECTLY.
THIS IS NOT ABOUT A HANDOUT.
THIS IS AN INSURANCE PROGRAM.
WE DO OURSELVES NO FAVORS BY 
HAVING 11 MILLION UNDOCUMENTED 
PEOPLE IN OUR COUNTRY BE UNABLE 
TO ACCESS HEALTH CARE.
THE REAL PROBLEM IS WE SHOULDN'T
HAVE 11 MILLION UNDOCUMENTED 
PEOPLE WITH NO PATHWAY TO 
CITIZENSHIP.
IT MAKES NO SENSE.
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AGREE ON 
WHAT TO DO.
THIS IS A CRAZY THING.
IF LEADERSHIP CONSISTS OF 
FORMING A CONSENSUS AROUND A 
DIVISIVE ISSUE, THIS WHITE HOUSE
HAS DIVIDED US AROUND A 
CONSENSUS ISSUE.
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WANT A 
PATHWAY TO U CITIZENSHIP, 
PROTECTION FOR DREAMERS.
WE NEEDO CLEAN UP THE LAWFUL 
IMMIGRATION SYSTEM LIKE HOW MY 
FATHER CAME TO THIS COUNTRY.

Spanish: 
>>>  ALCALDE BUTTIGIEG, ¿ POR 
QUÉ?
>>>  POR QUÉ NUESTRO PAÍS ES MÁS
SANO CUANDO TODOS ESTÁN SANOS. 
ESTAMOS HABLANDO DE ALGO QUE LA 
GENTE PUEDE COMPRAR OPCIO
OPCIONALMENTE.
 ELLOS PAGAN IMPUESTOS DE MANERA
DIRECTA O INDIRECTA.
 ESTO ES UN PROGRAMA  Y NO 
HACEMOS NADA POSITIVO PARA 
NOSOTROS AL MANTENER A ESTA 
GENTE SIN ACCESO A LA SALUD. 
PERO EL PROBLEMA REAL ES QUE NO 
DEBIÉSEMOS TENER 11 MILLONES DE 
PERSONAS SIN CIUDADANÍA. NO 
TIENE SENTIDO.
 LOS ESTADOUNIDENSES ESTÁN DE 
ACUERDO CON ESTO.
 SI EL LIDERAZGO CONSISTE DE 
GENERAR CONSENSO EN TORNO A UN 
TEMA DIVISIVO, ESTA CASA BLANCA 
NO

English: 
WE CAN DO
 WHATEVER COMMON SENSE 
MEASURES ARE NEEDED AT THE 
BORDER.
WASHINGTON CAN'T DELIVER ON 
SOMETHING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE 
WANT.
WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU ABOUT 
THE SYSTEM WE ARE LIVING IN?
>> MAYOR, THANK YOU. 
>> STRUCTURAL REFORM. 
>> VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN, I 
BELIEVE YOU  SAID YOUR HEALTH 
CARE PLAN WOULD NOT COVER 
UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS.
COULD YOU EXPLAIN YOUR POSITION?
>> I BEG YOUR PARDON?
>> I BELIEVE WITH A SHOW OF 
HANDS YOUME CAN'T RAISE YOUR HA.
DID YOU?
>> I DID.
>> SORRY.
YOU SAID THEY WOULD BE COVERED 
UNDER YOUR PLAN WHICH IS 
DIFFERENT FROM OBAMACARE.
CAN YOU EXPLAIN THAT?
>> YES.
YOU CANNOT LET PEOPLE WHO ARE 
SICK NOS  MATTER WHERE THEY COM 
FROM, NO MATTER THEIR STATUS GO 
UNCOVERED.
YOU CAN'T DO THAT.
IT WILL BE TAKEN CARE OF, 
PERIOD.
IT'S THE HUMANE THING TO DO.
HERE'S THE DEAL.
HE'S RIGHT ABOUT THREE THINGS.
NUMBER ONE, THEY, IN FACT, 
CONTRIBUTE TO THE WELL-BEING OF 
THE COUNTRY.
THEY ALSO, FOR EXAMPLE, INCREASE
THE LIFE SPAN OF SOCIAL 

Spanish: 
NOS HA DIVIDIDO.
 DEBEMOS LIMPIAR EL SISTEMA DE 
INMIGRACIÓN.
 Y DEBEMOS TOMAR LAS DECISIONES 
A PESAR DE QUE DEBAMOS CEDER.
¿ QUÉ LES DICE QUE WASHINGTON NO
QUIERA CEDER?
 NECESITAMOS UNA REFORMA 
ESTRUCTURAL.
>>>  USTED DICE QUE SU PLAN NO 
CUBRE A LOS INMIGRANTES I
INDOCUMENTADOS,.
¿ LEVANTÓ SU MANO?
>>>  SÍ.
>>>  USTED DICE QUE KIM JONG-UN 
LOS CUBRIRÍA.
>>>  SÍ.
>>> ¿ PUEDE EXPLICÁRMELO?
>>>  COMO DIJO EL ALCALDE, NO 
PODEMOS DEJAR A LA GENTE EN
ENFERMA, INDEPENDIENTE DE SU 
ORIGEN,  LOS PODEMOS DEJAR SIN 
COBERTURA.
 ES LO BÁSICO.

Spanish: 
 ÉL TIENE RAZÓN ENTRE PUNTOS. 
PRIMERO, ELLOS CONTRIBUYEN AL 
BIENESTAR DEL PAÍS  Y TAMBIÉN 
POTENCIAN LA SEGURIDAD SOCIAL. 
PAGAN IMPUESTOS.
 HARÍAN LO MISMO EN TÉRMINOS DE 
REDUCIR EL COSTO AL INGRESAR AL 
SISTEMA.
 SEGUNDO, PODEMOS TRABAJAR CON
LAS COMPAÑÍAS ASEGURADORAS  
ENCARCELANDO A LOS EJECUTIVOS 
CUANDO MIENTEN, CUANDO HACEN 
COSAS COMO LO QUE HICIERON CON 
LOS OPIOIDES.
 DEBEMOS ASEGURARNOS QUE TODOS 
PUEDAN NEGOCIAR CON EL GOBIERNO 
O EL COSTO DEL FÁRMACO.
 DEBEMOS ESTAR EN LA POSICIÓN DE
PERMITIRLE A LA GENTE LA OPCIÓN.
>>>  UN MOMENTO.
 VAMOS A UNA BREVE PAUSA.
 VOLVEMOS EN BREVE DESPUÉS DE 
ESTOS COMERCIALES.
(APLAUSOS). 

English: 
SECURITY.
THEY ARE PAYING THE SOCIAL 
SECURITY TAX.
IT INCREASED THE LIFE SPAN.
THEY WOULD DO THE SAME THING IN 
TERMS OF THE OVERALL COST OF 
HEALTH CARE BY THEM BEING 
TREATED AND NOT WAIT.
THE OTHER THING IS WE CAN DEAL 
WITH INSURANCE COMPANIES BY 
PUTTING INSURANCE EXECUTIVES IN 
JAIL FOR MISLEADING ADVERTISING,
WHATTER THIS DOING WITH OPIOIDS,
PAYING DOCTORS TOTO PRESCRIBE.
WE CAN MAKE SURE EVERYONE WHO IS
ON MEDICARE THAT THE GOVERNMENT 
SHOULD BE ABLE TO NEGOTIATE THE 
PRICE FOR WHATEVER THE DRUG 
COSTS HEARE.
THEY CAN DO THIS BY MAKING SURE 
THEY ARE IN A POSITION THAT WE, 
IN T FACT, ALLOW PEOPLE. 
>> TIME'S UP.
>> WE NEED TO TAKE A SHORT 
BREAK.
WE HAVE A LOT MORE TO TALK TO 
YOU ABOUT.
STICK WITH US.
WE'RE JUST GETTING STARTED.
WE'LL BE RIGHT BACK AFTER THIS.
L
STAY WITH US.
WE'RE JUST GETTING STARTED.

English: 
WE'LL BE RIGHT BACK FROM MIAMI 
RIGHT AFTER THIS.
>>>
. 
>>> WELCOME BACK FROM MIAMI.
JOSE WILL LEAD OFF THE 
QUESTIONING THIS ROUND. 

Spanish: 
(APLAUSOS). 
(APLAUSOS). 
(APLAUSOS). 

Spanish: 
>>> BIENVENIDOS DE VUELTA.
 SIGAMOS CON LA PREGUNTA.
>>>  SENADORA HARRIS,  EL MES 
PASADO MÁS DE 130,000 MIGRANTES 
FUERON ARRESTADOS EN LA FRONTERA
SUR. MUCHOS DE ELLOS FUERON 
DETENIDOS, INCLUIDOS NIÑOS,  EN 
CENTROS DE DETENCIÓN PRIVADOS EN
FLORIDA Y EN RESTO DEL PAÍS.
 LA MAYORÍA DE LOS CANDIDATOS 
DICEN QUE LAS CONDICIONES DE 
ESTAS INSTALACIONES SON TERR
TERRIBLES.
 EL 20 DE ENERO DE 2021,  SI 
USTEDES ELECTA PRESIDENTA, ¿ QÉE
HARÍA CON LOS MILES DE PERSONAS 
QUE INTENTAN ENTRAR A ESTADOS 
UNIDOS A DIARIO Y QUIEREN UNA 
MEJOR VIDA.
>>>  LO QUERÍA COMO PRIMERA COSA
ES NO OLVIDAR A LAS RECEPTORES 
DE DACA.
 VOY A REINSTAURAR EL ESTATUS 

English: 
>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
SENATOR HARRIS, LAST MONTH MORE 
THAN 130,000 MIGRANTS WERE 
APPREHENDED AT THE SOUTHERN 
BORDER.
MANY OF THEM ARE BEING DETAINED,
INCLUDING SMALL CHILDREN IN 
PRIVATE DETENTION CENTERS IN 
FLORIDA AND THROUGHOUT OUR 
COUNTRY.
MOST OF THE CANDIDATES ON THIS 
STAGE SAY THE CONDITIONS OF 
THESE FACILITIES ARE ABHORRENT.
ON JANUARY 20, 2021, IF YOU ARE 
PRESIDENT, WHAT SPECIFICALLY 
WOULD YOU DO WITH THE THOUSANDS 
OF PEOPLE WHO TRY TO REACH THE 
UNITED STATES EVERY DAY AND WANT
A BETTER LIFE THROUGH ASYLUM?
>> IMMEDIATELY ON JANUARY 20 OF 
2021, I WILL FIRST OF ALL -- WE 
CANNOT FORGET OUR DACA 
RECIPIENTS.
I'M GOING TO STOP THERE.
I WILL IMMEDIATELY BY EXECUTIVE 
ACTION REINSTATE DACA STATUS AND
PROTECTION TO THOSE YOUNG 
PEOPLE.
I WILL FURTHER EXTEND 
PROTECTIONS FOR DEFERRAL OF 
DEPORTATION FOR THEIR PARENTS 

Spanish: 
DACA  Y PROTEGER A ESOS JÓVENES.
 EXTENDERÍA LA PROTECCIÓN A LA 
DEPORTACIÓN DE SUS PADRES Y 
VETERANOS QUE SON PERSONAS 
INDOCUMENTADAS Y QUE LUCHARON 
POR NOTA DEMOCRACIA. TAMBIÉN VOY
A GENERAR UN PROCESO DE REVISIÓN
Y ME VOY A DESHACER DE LOS 
CENTROS DE DETENCIÓN Y ME 
ASEGURARÉ DE QUE ESTE MICRÓFONO,
QUE EL PRESIDENTE DE LOS ESTADOS
UNIDOS MANTIENE EN SU PODER,  SE
UTILICE DE UNA MANERA QUE 
REFLEJE LOS VALORES EN OTRO PAÍS
Y NO EN CARCELE ENCARCELAR A 
ALEJARLOS DE SUS PADRES.
 DEMOS PENSAR QUE SON PERSONAS 
REALES. UNA MADRE QUE LE PAGA A 
UN COYOTE PARA QUE TRANSPORTE A 
SU HIJO DESDE SU PAÍS, A LO L

English: 
AND FOR VETERANS WHO WE HAVE SO 
MANY UNDOCUMENTED AND WHO HAVE 
SERVED OUR COUNTRY AND FOUGHT 
FOR OUR DEMOCRACY.
I WILL ALSO IMMEDIATELY PUT IN 
PLACE A MEANINGFUL PROS FOR 
REVIEWING THE CASES FOR ASYLUM.
I WILL RELEASE CHILDREN FROM 
CAGES, GET RID OF THE PRIVATE 
DETENTION CENTERS AND I WILL 
ENSURE THAT THIS MICROPHONE THAT
THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED 
STATES HOLDS IN HER HAND IS USED
IN A WAY -- 
[ CHEERS ]
-- THAT IS ABOUT RESPECTING THE 
VALUES OF OUR COUNTRY AND NOT 
ABOUT LOCKING CHILDREN UP, 
SEPARATING THEM FROM THEIR 
PARENTS.
I HAVE TO SAY WE HAVE TO THINK 
ABOUT THIS ISSUE IN TERMS OF 
REAL PEOPLE.
A MOTHER WHO PAYS A COYOTE TO 
TRANSPORT HER CHILD THROUGH 
MEXICO FACING UNKNOWN PERIL TO 
COME HERE, WHY WOULD THAT MOTHER

Spanish: 
LARGO DE MÉXICO, ENFRENTANDO 
PELIGROS DESCONOCIDOS PARA L
LLEGAR AQUÍ. ¿POR QUÉ LO HACEN?
 PORQUE DECIDIÓ QUE QUE SU HIJO 
SE QUEDE ES PEOR. ¿QUÉ HACEN 
TRUMP?
 LES DICE "VUELVE A TU PAÍS”.
 ESO NO REFLEJA A NUESTRO PAÍS. 
DE
>>>  GOBERNADOR.
 SU PRIMER DÍA EN LA CASA BLA
BLANCA, ¿CÓMO RESPONDERÍA A E
ESTO?
>>>  EN BREVE HABLARE CON USTED.
>>>  GOBERNADOR,  MILES DE 
HOMBRES COMO MUJERES Y NIÑOS 
PIDIENDO ASILO. ¿QUÉ HARÍA US
USTED?
>>>  SIN DUDA LO QUE HEMOS VISTO

English: 
DO THAT?
I WILL TELL YOU.
BECAUSE TO REMAIN WHERE THEY ARE
IS WORSE.
WHAT DOES DONALD TRUMP DO?
HE SAYS GO BACK TO WHERE YOU 
CAME FROM.
THAT'S NOT REFLECTIVE OF OUR 
AMERICA AND OUR VALUES AND IT'S 
GOT TO END.
>> GOVERNOR HICKENLOOPER, DAY 
ONE, IF YOU ARE -- DAY ONE AT 
THE WHITE HOUSE, HOW DO YOU -- 
>> DEAL WITH THESE CHILDREN?
>> LET ME GET TO YOU IN JUST A 
SECOND. 
>> I'M SORRY.
>> GOVERNOR.
DAY ONE?
THOUSANDS OF MEN, WOMEN AND 
CHILDREN ASK FOR ASYLUM FOR A 
BETTER LIFE.
WHAT DO YOU DO?
DAY ONE, HOUR ONE.
>> CERTAINLY THE IMAGES WE HAVE 
SEEN THIS WEEK COMPOUND THE 
EMOTIONAL IMPACT THE WORLD IS 
JUDGING US BY.
IF YOU TOLD ME AT MY TIME IN MY 

Spanish: 
ESTA SEMANA RESUMEN EL IMPACTO 
EMOCIONAL.
 SI ALGUNA VEZ ME DIJERAN QUE 
ESTE PAÍS SANCIONARÍA A LOS 
AGENTES FEDERALES POR SACAR A 
LOS HIJOS DE LOS BRAZOS DE SUS 
PADRES, PONERLOS A ADOPCIÓN, EN 
COLORADO ESOS ARRE RAPTO,  LES 
HUBIESE DICHO QUE NO LES CREO.
 LO PRIMERO QUE DEBEMOS HACER ES
RECONOCER QUE ESTA ES UNA CRISIS
HUMANITARIA,.
 DEBEMOS GARANTIZAR QUE ELLA 
INSTALACIONES SUFICIENTES PARA 
QUE MUJERES Y NIÑOS NO SEAN 
SEPARADOS.
 QUE LOS NIÑOS SE MANTENGAN CON 
SUS FAMILIAS.
 DEBEMOS ASEGURARNOS DE REFORMAR
COMPLETAMENTE A ICE,.
 DEBEMOS HACER QUE SU TRABAJO 
SEA DESDE UNA PERSPECTIVA 
HUMANITARIA.
 TAMBIÉN DEBEMOS GARANTIZAR  NO 

English: 
LIFE THIS COUNTRY WOULD SANCTION
FEDERAL AGENTS TO TAKE CHILDREN 
FROM THE ARMS OF THEIR PARENTS, 
PUT THEM IN CAGES, PUT THEM UP 
FOR ADOPTION -- IN COLORADO WE 
CALL THAT KIDNAPPING.
I WOULD HAVE TOLD YOU IT WAS 
UNBELIEVABLE.
FIRST YOU HAVE TO RECOGNIZE THE 
HUMANITARIAN CRISIS ON THE 
BORDER FOR WHAT IT IS.
MAKE SURE THERE ARE SUFFICIENT 
FACILITIES IN PLACE SO WOMEN AND
CHILDREN AREN'T SEPARATED FROM 
THEIR FAMILIES.
THE CHILDREN ARE WITH THEIR 
FAMILIES.
WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE I.C.E. IS 
REFORMED AND THEY BEGIN LOOKING 
AT THEIR JOB IN A HUMANITARIAN 
WAY WHERE THEY ARE ADDRESSING 
THE WHOLE NEEDS OF THE PEOPLE 
THAT THEY ARE ENGAGED WITH ALONG
THE BORDER.
WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE ULTIMATELY 
WE PROVIDE NOT JUST SHELTER BUT 
FOOD, CLOTHING AND ACCESS TO 
MEDICAL CARE.
MS. WILLIAM SON?
>> WHAT DONALD TRUMP HAS DONE TO
THE CHILDREN AND IT'S NOT JUST 
COLORADO.
IT IS KIDNAPPING.
YOU'RE RIGHT.

English: 
IT IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT TO 
REALIZE THAT.
IF YOU TAKE A CHILD FROM THEIR 
PARENT'S ARMS YOU ARE KIDNAPPING
THEM.
IF YOU TAKE A LOT OF CHILDREN 
AND PUT THEM IN A DETAINMENT 
CENTER THAT INFLICTS TRAUMA UPON
THEM.
THIS IS COLLECTIVE CHILD ABUSE.
BOTH OF THOSE THINGS ARE A 
CRIME.
IF YOUR GOVERNMENT DOES IT THAT 
DOESN'T MAKE IT LESS OF A CRIME.
THESE ARE STATE-SPONSORED 
CRIMES.
WHAT PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS DONE IS
NOT ONLY ATTACKED THESE 
CHILDREN, NOT ONLY DEMONIZED 
IMMIGRANTS HE'S ATTACKING A 
BASIC PRINCIPLE OF AMERICA'S 
MORALE CORE.
WE OPEN OUR HEARTS TO THE 
STRANGER.
THIS IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT.
IT IS ALSO IMPORTANT FOR ALL OF 
US AND I HAVE GREAT RESPECT FOR 
EVERYONE ON THIS STAGE.
WE ARE GOING TO TALK ABOUT WHAT 
TO DO ABOUT HEALTH CARE.
WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN, GUYS?
IT'S NOT JUST A MATTER OF A 
PLAN.

Spanish: 
SOLO ASILO, SINO COMIDA, VE
VESTIMENTA Y SALUD
>>>  LO QUE HA HECHO ESTA TRUMP 
RAPTO ES IMPORTANTE QUE LO R
RECONOZCAMOS. SI SEPARAMOS A UN 
NIÑO DE SUS PADRES, LO ESTÁS 
GASTANDO. SI LUEGO LOS PONEMOS 
EN UN CENTRO DE DE DETENCIÓN LOS
ESTAMOS TRAMANDO, ES ABUSO DE 
MENORES COLECTIVO.
 SON CRÍMENES. SI EL GOBIERNO LO
HACE, NO SIGNIFICA QUE NO ES UN 
CRIMEN. ESTOS SON CRÍMENES DE 
ESTADO.
(APLAUSOS). 
(APLAUSOS). 
>>>  LO QUE HIZO EL PRESIDENTE 
TRUMP NO SOLO ES ATACAR A LOS 
NIÑOS, DEMONIZAR A LOS 
INMIGRANTES, ESTÁ ATACANDO EL 
PRINCIPIO DE ESTADOS UNIDOS. 
NOSOTROS ACOGEMOS A LOS 
FORÁNEOS.
 ES MUY IMPORTANTE PARA NOS
NOSOTROS.

Spanish: 
 SI VAMOS HABLAR DE SALUD, DÓNDE
HAN ESTADO? NINGUNO DE USTEDES 
HA HABLADO DE LAS POLÍTICAS 
EXTERIORES DE ESTADOS UNIDOS A 
EST 
LATINOAMÉRICA.
>>>  SENADORA GILLIBRAND, ¿ QUÉ 
HARÍA USTED COMO PRESIDENTA?
>>>  UNA DE LAS PEORES COSAS DE 
TRUMP ES QUE HA DESTROZADO EL 
ENTRAMADO ÉTICO DE ESTADOS 
UNIDOS. CUANDO COMENZAMOS A 
SEPARAR A LOS NIÑOS, QUE SIETE 
NIÑOS HAYAN MUERTO BAJO SU 
CUSTODIA, QUE DOCENAS DE NIÑOS 
HAYAN SIDO SEPARADOS DE SUS 
PADRES Y NO TENGAN PLAN DE SER 
REUNIDOS. HARÍA VARIAS COSAS. 
PRIMERO, UNA REFORMA COMPLETA.
 REFORMA HARÍA CÓMO TRATAMOS A 
QUIENES SOLICITAN ASILO, UN 
CENTRO COMUNITARIO EN DONDE EL 
LAS PERSONAS RECIBEN ABOGADOS, 

English: 
I HAVEN'T HEARD ANYBODY ON THIS 
AND HOW WE MIGHT HAVE 
CONTRIBUTED TO SOMETHING -- 
>> SENATOR GILLIBRAND, WHAT 
WOULD YOU DO WITH A PRESIDENT 
WITH THIS REALITY?
>> THIS PRESIDENT HAS TORN APART
THE MORAL FABRIC OF WHO WE ARE.
WHEN HE STARTED SEPARATING 
CHILDREN AT THE BORDER FROM 
THEIR PARENTS.
THE FACT THAT SEVEN CHILDREN 
HAVE DIED IN HIS CUSTODY, THE 
FACT THAT DOZENS OF CHILDREN 
HAVE BEEN SEPARATED FROM THEIR 
PARENTS AND THEY HAVE NO PLAN TO
REUNITE THEM, I WOULD DO A FEW 
THINGS.
FIRST I WOULD FIGHT FOR 
COMPREHENSIVE IMMIGRATION REFORM
WITH A PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP.
SECOND, I WOULD REFORM HOW WE 
TREAT SLIME SEEKERS AT THE 
BORDER.
I WOULD HAVE A COMMUNITY-BASED 
TREATMENT CENTER WHERE YOU ARE 
DOING WITHIN THE COMMUNITIES 
WHERE SLIME SEEKERS ARE GIVEN 
LAWYERS, WHERE THERE IS REAL 
IMMIGRATION JUDGES, NOT 
EMPLOYEES OF THE ATTORNEY 
GENERAL BUT APPOINTED FOR LIFE 
AND HAVE A COMMUNITY-BASED 
SYSTEM.
THE WORST THING PRESIDENT TRUMP 

English: 
HAS DONE IS DIVERTED FUNDS AWAY 
FROM CROSS-BORDER TERRORISM, 
HUMAN TRAFFICKING, DRUG AND GUN 
TRAFFICKING AND HE'S GIVEN THE 
MONEY TO THE FOR PROFIT PRISONS.
I WOULD NOT SPEND MONEY ON FOR 
PROFIT PRISONS TO LOCK UP 
CHILDREN AND ASYLUM SEEKERS. 
>> WE HAD A SPIRITED DEBATE ON 
THE TOPIC OF DECRIMINALIZATION 
OF THE BORDER.
RAISE YOUR HAND IF YOU THINK IT 
SHOULD BE A CIVIL OFFENSE RATHER
THAN A CRIME TO CROSS A BORDER 
WITHOUT DOCUMENTATION?
KEEP YOUR HANDS UP SO WE CAN SEE
THEM. 
>> THAT'S NOT A THEORETICAL 
EXERCISE.
CRIMINALZATION IS THE BASIS FOR 
FAMILY SEPARATION.
YOU DO AWAY WITH THAT IT'S NO 
LONGER POSSIBLE.
OF COURSE IT WOULDN'T BE 
POSSIBLE IN MY PRESIDENCY 
BECAUSE IT IS DEAD WRONG.
THE REPUBLICAN PARTY LIKES TO 
CLOAK ITSELF IN THE LANGUAGE OF 
RELIGION.
OUR PARTY DOESN'T TALK ABOUT 

Spanish: 
DONDE HAYA  JUECES DE VERDAD Y
NO EMPLEADOS DEL FISCAL GENERAL.
FINANCIARÍA LA SEGURIDAD 
FRONTERIZA. EL PRESIDENTE TRUMP 
A SEPARADO LOS FONDOS Y SE LOS 
ENTREGÓ A LAS PRISIONES. YO NO 
GASTARÍA ESE DINERO PARA ENC
ENCERRAR A NIÑOS Y PERSONA QUE 
PIDEN ASILO.
>>>  SE DEBATIÓ ANOCHE SOBRE 
DESPENALIZAR LA FRONTERA.
 LEVANTEN LA MANO SI USTEDES 
PIENSAN QUE DEBE SER UNA OFENSA 
CIVIL Y NO UN CRIMEN PENAL.
 MANTENGAN SUS MANOS EN ALTO.
>>>  ESO NO ES UN EJERCICIO 
ÉTÉT 
TEÓRICO, ESAS LA BASE  DE LA 
SEPARACIÓN FAMILIAR.

English: 
THAT AS MUCH.
WE ARE COMMITTED TO THE 
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE 
AND WE STAND FOR PEOPLE OF EVERY
RELIGION AND NO RELIGION.
WE SHOULD CALL OUT HYPOCRISY 
WHEN WE SEE IT.
FOR A PARTY THAT ASSOCIATES 
ITSELF WITH CHRISTIANITY, TO SAY
THAT IT IS OKAY TO SUGGEST THAT 
GOD WOULD SMILE ON THE DIVISION 
OF FAMILIES AT THE HANDS OF 
FEDERAL AGENTS, THAT GOD WOULD 
CONDONE PUTTING CHILDREN IN 
CAGES HAS LOST ALL CLAIM TO EVER
USE RELIGIOUS LANGUAGE AGAIN.
>> VICE PRESIDENT -- MR. VICE 
PRESIDENT, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU 
RAISED YOUR HAND OR WERE ASKING 
TO SPEAK.
WOULD YOU DECRIMINALIZE CROSSING
THE BORDER WITHOUT DOCUMENTS?
>> THE FIRST THING I WOULD DO IS
UNITE FAMILIES.
I WOULD SURGE IMMEDIATELY 
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN HELP TO 
THE REGION IMMEDIATELY.
LOOK, I TALK ABOUT FOREIGN 
POLICY.
I'M THE GUY THAT GOT A 
BIPARTISAN AGREEMENT AT THE END 

Spanish: 
 NO DEBIESE SER POSIBLE Y NO LO 
SERÁN MI PRESIDENCIA.
 EL PARTIDO REPUBLICANO QUIERE 
ENMASCARAR SUS COSAS DE LA 
RELIGIÓN. NOSOTROS NO LO 
HACEMOS, ESTAMOS COMPROMETIDOS 
CON LA SEPARACIÓN DE LOS PODERES
 SIN EMBARGO, DEBEMOS DENUNCIAR 
LA HIPOCRESÍA. UN PARTIDO QUE SE
ASOCIA CON LA CHRISTIAN IRÁS 
QUERÍA QUE ESTÁ BIEN DECIR QUE A
DIOS LE AGRADA LA SEPARACIÓN DE 
LAS FAMILIAS.
 QUE PERDONARÍA QUE SE PONGA A 
NIÑOS EN JAULAS HA PERDIDO EL 
DERECHO A UTILIZAR LA RETÓRICA 
RELIGIOSA POR SIEMPRE.
>>>  VICEPRESIDENTE, ¿ ESTABA 
PIDIENDO TURNO PARA HABLAR O 
LEVANTÓ LA MANO?
>>>  LO PRIMERO QUE HARÍA ES 
REUNIR A LAS FAMILIAS DE 
INMEDIATO.
 ESTOY HABLANDO DE POLÍTICA 
EXTERIOR.

Spanish: 
 YO LOGRE UN ACUERDO BI
BIPARTIDISTA AL FINAL DE NUESTRO
BO
GOBIERNO PARA HACERNOS CARGO DE 
ESTE PROBLEMA.
 ATACAR LA BASE DE POR QUÉ LA 
GENTE SE IBA.
 ESTABA FUNCIONANDO. VIMOS UNA 
DISMINUCIÓN EN LA CANTIDAD DE 
NIÑOS QUE VENÍAN AL PAÍS.
 CUANDO ESTÉ PRESIDENTE INGRESÓ 
AL PODER, LO DESCONTINUÓ.
 YO HICE ESTO.
 SEGUNDO, LA LEY REQUIERE REUNIR
A LAS FAMILIAS. LO HARÍAMOS Y 
YA,.
 NO PONDRÍAMOS A LOS NIÑOS EN 
CIRCUNSTANCIAS PELIGROSAS. POR 
ÚLTIMO, LA IDEA DE QUE EL D
DEPARTAMENTO JUSTICIA DIGA QUE 
NIÑOS EN JAULAS NO NECESITAN UNA
CAMA, NO NECESITAN UNA COBIJA.
 ESO ME PARECE ESCANDALOSO.

English: 
OF THE CAMPAIGN, OUR TERM TO 
SPEND $740 MILLION TO DEAL WITH 
THE PROBLEM.
THAT WAS TO GO TO THE ROOT 
PROBLEM OF WHY PEOPLE ARE 
LEAVING IN THE FIRST PLACE.
WE SAW A NET DECREASE IN THEM 
COMING.
THE CRISIS WAS ABATED.
THIS PRESIDENT DISCONTINUED 
THAT.
I DID IT.
SECOND THING WE HAVE TO DO, THE 
LAW NOW REQUIRES THE REUNITING 
OF FAMILIES.
WE WOULD REUNITE THOSE FAMILIES,
PERIOD.
IF NOT WE'D PUT CHILDREN IN A 
CIRCUMSTANCE WHERE THEY WERE 
SAFE UNTIL WE COULD FIND THEIR 
PARENTS.
LASTLY, THE IDEA THAT THE 
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT IS SAYING 
CHILDREN IN CAGES DO NOT NEED A 
BED, DO NOT NEED A BLANKET, DO 
NOT NEED A TOOTHBRUSH IS 
OUTRAGEOUS.
>> THE OBAMA/BIDEN 
ADMINISTRATION DEPORTED MORE 

English: 
THAN 3 MILLION AMERICANS.
MY QUESTION TO YOU IS IF AN 
INDIVIDUAL IS LIVING IN THE 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WITHOUT
DOCUMENTS AND THAT IS HIS ONLY 
OFFENSE, SHOULD THAT PERSON BE 
DEPORTED?
>> NO.
>> DEPENDING IF THEY COMMITTED A
MAJOR CRIME.
THEY SHOULD BE DEPORTED.
PRESIDENT OBAMA, I THINK, DID A 
HECK OF A JOB.
COMPARE HIM TO WHAT THIS GUY IS 
DOING IS ABSOLUTELY IMMORAL.
THE FACT IS THAT, LOOK, WE 
SHOULD NOT BE LOCKING PEOPLE UP.
WE SHOULD MAKE SURE WE CHANGE 
THE CIRCUMSTANCE AS WE DID, WHY 
THEY WOULD LEAVE IN THE FIRST 
PLACE.
THOSE WHO COME SEEKING ASYLUM, 
WE SHOULD IMMEDIATELY HAVE THE 
CAPACITY TO ABSORB THEM, KEEP 
THEM SAFE UNTIL THEY COULD BE 
HEARD. 
>> 15 SECONDS, IF YOU WOULD, TO 
ANSWER.
SHOULD SOMEONE WHO IS HERE 
WITHOUT DOCUMENTS AND THAT'S HIS
ONLY OFFENSE, SHOULD THAT PERSON
BE DEPORTED?
>> THAT PERSON SHOULD NOT BE THE
FOCUS OF DEPORTATION.
WE SHOULD FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE 
THE WAY WE DEAL WITH THINGS. 

Spanish: 
>>>  EL GOBIERNO DE OBAMA Y B
BIDEN  DEPORTÓ A MÁS DE 3 MIL
MILLONES DE EST.
 SI UNA PERSONA VIVE EN ESTADOS 
UNIDOS SIN DOCUMENTOS,  ESA ES 
SU ÚNICA OFENSA. ¿DEBE SER 
DEPORTADO?
>>>  DEPENDE DE SI COMETIERON O 
NO UN CRIMEN,.
 EL PRESIDENTE OBAMA HIZO UN 
GRAN TRABAJO. COMPARARLO CON LO 
QUE HACE ESTE TIPO ME PARECE 
INMORAL.
 NO DEBEMOS ENCERRAR A LA GENTE,
DEBEMOS ASEGURARNOS DE CAMBIAR 
LAS CIRCUNSTANCIAS DE ELLOS.
 DEBEMOS CAMBIAR EL POR QUÉ 
SALEN DE SU PAÍS EN UN COMIENZO.
EN UN COMIENZO DE MÁS TENER LA 
CAPACIDAD DE ABSORBER LOS CÓMO 
MANTENER LOS SEGUROS.
>>>  EN SOLO 15 SEGUNDOS, ¿ A
ALGUIEN QUE ESTABA AQUÍ INDO
INDOCUMENTADO Y  QUE ERA SU 
ÚNICO CRIMEN, DEBE SER DEP
DEPORTADO?

English: 
>> SENATOR -- 
>> I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT -- 
>> I AGREE WITH WHAT KAMALA 
HARRIS SAID.
ON DAY ONE WE TAKE OUT THE 
EXECUTIVE ORDER PEN AND RESCIND 
EVERY DAMN THING ON THE ISSUE 
THAT TRUMP HAS DONE.
>> ABSOLUTELY.
>> PICKING UP ON A POINT JOE 
MADE, WE HAVE TO LOOK AT THE 
ROOT CAUSES.
YOU HAVE A SITUATION WHERE 
HONDURAS, AMONG OTHER THINGS IS 
A -- MASSIVE CORRUPTION.
TELLING FAMILIES IF A 
10-YEAR-OLD DOESN'T JOIN THE 
GANG THEIR FAMILY WILL BE 
KILLED.
WHAT WE HAVE TO DO ON DAY ONE IS
INVITE THE PRESIDENT AND THE 
LEADERSHIP OF CENTRAL AMERICA 
AND MEXICO TOGETHER.
THIS IS A HEMISPHERE PROBLEM. 
>> THANK YOU.
>> WHAT DO YOU DO?
>> DAY ONE.
IF SOMEONE IS HERE WITHOUT 
DOCUMENTS AND THAT'S THEIR ONLY 
OFFENSE, IS THAT PERSON TO BE 
DEPORTED?

Spanish: 
>>>  NO DEBE SER EL FOCO DE LA 
DEPORTACIÓN.
>>>  CONCUERDO CON MUCHO DE LO 
QUE DIJO CAMAKAMALA,.
 DURANTE EL PRIMER DÍA EMITIMOS 
UN DECRETO EJECUTIVO Y ELIM
ELIMINAMOS TODO LO QUE DIJO 
TRUMP.
 DEBEMOS ATACAR EL PROBLEMA DE 
BASE.
 HONDURAS ES UN ESTADO EN DONDE 
HAY CORRUPCIÓN. HAY PANDILLAS 
QUE LE DICEN A LA FAMILIA ES QUE
SI SU HIJO DE 10 AÑOS NO INGRESA
A LA PANDILLA, TODOS MORIRÁN.
 DEBEMOS INVITAR A LOS LIDERES 
DE LOS PAÍSES CENTROAMERICANOS Y
DE MÉXICO PARA RESOLVER ESTO.
>>> ¿ QUÉ HARÍA USTED?
>>>  SI ALGUIEN ESTÁ ACÁ SIN 
DOCUMENTOS Y ESE ES SU ÚNICO 
CRIMEN.

English: 
>> NO.
THAT PERSON CAN BE A PART OF 
THIS GREAT AMERICAN EXPERIENCE.
MY CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT IS ONE
OF THE MOST DIVERSE IN AMERICA.
WE SEE THE BENEFITS WHEN PEOPLE 
CONTRIBUTE AND BECOME PART OF 
THE COMMUNITY AND THEY ARE NOT 
IN THE SHADOW ECONOMY.
DAY ONE FOR ME, FAMILIES ARE 
REUNITED.
THIS PRESIDENT FOR IMMIGRANTS, 
THERE IS NOTHING HE WILL NOT DO 
TO SEPARATE A FAMILY, CAGE A 
CHILD OR ERASE THEIR EXISTENCE 
BY WEAPONIZING THE CENSUS.
THERE IS NOTHING WE CANNOT DO IN
THE COURTS AND THAT I WILL NOT 
DO AS PRESIDENT TO REVERSE THAT 
AND TO MAKE SURE FAMILIES ALWAYS
BELONG TOGETHER. 
>> SENATOR HARRIS.
>> THANK YOU.
ABSOLUTELY NOT, THEY SHOULD NOT 
BE DEPORTED.
THIS WAS ONE OF THE VERY FEW 
ISSUES WITH WHICH I DISAGREED 
WITH THE ADMINISTRATION WITH 
WHOM I HAVE HAD A GREAT 
RELATIONSHIP AND A GREAT DEAL OF
RESPECT.
I WAS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF 
CALIFORNIA.
I LED THE SECOND LARGEST 

Spanish: 
¿ DEBE SER ESA PERSONA D
DEPORTADA?
>>>  NO.
 PUEDE SER PARTE DE ESTADOS U
UNIDOS.
 MI CONGRESO ES UNO DE LOS MÁS 
DIVERSOS Y HEMOS VISTO LOS B
BENEFICIOS DE CUANDO LA GENTE 
INGRESA A LA COMUNIDAD.
 EN MI PRIMER DÍA DE GOBIERNO 
LAS FAMILIAS SERÍAN REUNIDAS.
 ESTE PRESIDENTE HARÁ TODO LO 
QUE PUEDA PARA SEPARAR A LAS 
FAMILIAS Y ENJAULADA A LOS NIÑOS
O ELIMINAR SU EXISTENCIA.
 NO HAY NADA QUE NO PODAMOS 
HACER EN TRIBUNALES O QUE YO 
PUEDA HACER COMO PRESIDENTE PARA
REVERTIR ESO Y ASEGURARME DE QUE
LA FAMILIAS ESTÉN JUNTAS.
>>  SENADORA HARRIS.
>>>  POR SUPUESTO QUE NO DEBEN 
SER DEPORTADOS.

Spanish: 
 ES UNO DE LOS POCOS TEMAS EN 
LOS QUE NO ESTOY DE ACUERDO.
 EN ESTE TEMA ,  CUANDO YO ERA 
FISCAL DE CALIFORNIA, UN ESTADO 
DE 40 MILLONES DE PERSONAS, Y EN
ESTE TEMA NO ESTABA DE ACUERDO 
CON MI PRESIDENTE.
 LA POLÍTICA ERA PERMITIR LA 
DEPORTACIÓN  DE PERSONAS QUE NO 
ERAN CRIMINALES. COMO FISCAL 
GENERAL  YO EMITÍ UNA DIRECTIVA 
A LOS ALGUACILES DE MI ESTADO 
INDICADA QUE NO DEBÍAN CONCORDAR
CON LOS COAUTORES,.
 LO QUE YO IDENTIFIQUE ES QUE 
PADRES, PERSONAS QUE NO HABÍAN 
COMETIDO DELITOS, ESTABAN SIENDO
DEPORTADAS. TENGO UN PUNTO 
ADICIONAL. EL PROBLEMA CON ESTA 

English: 
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IN THE 
UNITED STATES.
SECOND ONLY TO THE UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IN A STATE
OF 40 MILLION PEOPLE.
ON THIS ISSUE, I DISAGREED WITH 
MY PRESIDENT.
THE POLICY WAS TO ALLOW 
DEPORTATION OF PEOPLE WHO, BY 
I.C.E.'S OWN DEFINITION WERE 
NONCRIMINALS.
AS ATTORNEY GENERAL AND THE 
CHIEF LAW OFFICER OF THE STATE 
OF CALIFORNIA, I ISSUED A 
DIRECTIVE TO THE SHERIFF OF THE 
STATE THEY DIDN'T HAVE TO COMPLY
WITH DETAINERS AND TO MAKE 
DECISIONS BASED ON THE PUBLIC 
SAFETY OF THE COMMUNITY.
WHAT I SAW, AND I WAS TRACKING 
IT EVERY DAY.
I WAS TRACKING IT AND SAW THAT 
PARENTS, PEOPLE WHO HAD NOT 
COMMITTED A CRIME WERE BEING 
DEPORTED.
I HAVE TO ADD A POINT HERE.
THE PROBLEM WITH THIS KIND OF 
POLICY, AND I KNOW IT AS A 
PROSECUTOR. 
>> SENATOR. 
>> I WANT A RAPE VICTIM TO BE 
ABLE TO RUN IN THE MIDDLE OF THE
STREET AND WAVE DOWN A POLICE 
OFFICER AND REPORT THE CRIME 

English: 
AGAINST HER.
I WANT ANYBODY -- 
>> SENATOR. 
>> -- WHO HAS BEEN THE VICTIM OF
A CRIME TO DO THAT AND NOT BE 
AFRAID THAT IF THEY DO THAT THEY
WILL BE DEPORTED BECAUSE THE 
ACCUSER WILL TELL THEM IT IS 
THEY WHO ARE THE CRIMINAL.
IT IS WRONG.
>> WE'RE GOING TO TURN TO THE 
ISSUE OF TRADE NOW, IF WE CAN.
LAST NIGHT WE ASKED THE 
CANDIDATES ON STAGE TO NAME THE 
GREATEST GEOPOLITICAL THREAT IN 
THE U.S.
FOUR MENTIONED CHINA.
U.S. BUSINESSES SAY CHINA STEALS
OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND 
KEEP THE COST OF GOODS 
ARTIFICIALLY LOW.
SENATOR BENNET, HOW WOULD YOU 
STAND UP TO CHINA?
>> FIRST OF ALL, THE BIGGEST 
THREAT TO OUR NATIONAL SECURITY 
IS RUSSIA, NOT CHINA.
BECAUSE OF WHAT THEY HAVE DONE 
WITH THE ELECTION.
IN CHINA, I THINK THE PRESIDENT 
HAS BEEN RIGHT TO PUSH BACK ON 
CHINA BUT HAS DONE IT IN 

Spanish: 
POLÍTICA Y YO LO SÉ COMO FISCAL,
ES QUE QUIERO QUE UNA PERSONA 
PUEDA REPORTAR QUE FUE VIOLADA. 
QUIERO QUE PERSONAS QUE HAN SIDO
VÍCTIMAS DE CRÍMENES REALES 
PUEDA HACER ESO Y NO TENGAN 
MIEDO DE SER DEPORTADAS.
 PARA QUE PUEDAN DENUNCIAR A LOS
VERDADEROS CRIMINALES.
>>>  VAMOS A HABLAR DE COMERCIO.
 ANOCHE PREGUNTAMOS A LOS 
CANDIDATOS LAS AMENAZAS 
GEOPOLÍTICAS.
 CUATRO MENCIONARLON A CHINA,.
 ACUSARON A CHINA DE MANIPULAR 
SU MONEDA.
 SENADOR BENNET, ¿ CÓMO ENF
ENFRENTARÍA A CHINA?
>>>  LO MÁS IMPORTANTE ES 
ATENDER A RUSIA, NO A CHINA.
 DEBIDO A LO QUE HICIERON CON 

English: 
COMPLETELY THE WRONG WAY.
WE SHOULD MOBILIZE THE ENTIRE 
REST OF THE WORLD WHO ALL HAVE 
SHARED SBRENS IN PUSHING BACK ON
TRADE POLICIES.
I WOULD LIKE TO ANSWER THE OTHER
QUESTION BEFORE AS WELL.
>> YOU HAVE THE TIME. 
>> WHEN I SEE THE KIDS AT THE 
BORDER, I SEE MY MOM BECAUSE I 
KNOW SHE SEES HERSELF.
SHE WAS SEPARATED FROM HER 
PARENTS FOR YEARS DURING THE 
HOLOCAUST IN POLAND.
FOR DONALD TRUMP TO DO WHAT HE'S
DOING, I SAY IT AS SOMEBODY WHO 
WROTE THE IMMIGRATION BILL THAT 
CREATED A PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP
FOR 11 MILLION PEOPLE IN THIS 
COUNTRY THAT HAD THE MOST 
PROGRESSIVE DREAM ACT THAT'S 
EVER BEEN CONCEIVED, MUCH LESS 
PASSED.
68 VOTES IN THE SENATE.
IT HAD 46 BILLION DOLLARS OF 
BORDER SECURITY.
IT WAS SOPHISTICATED 21st 
CENTURY BORDER SECURITY, NOT A 
MEDIEVAL WALL. 
>> SENATOR, TIME HAS EXPIRED. 
>> THE BORDER OF THE UNITED 
STATES INTO A SYMBOL OF 
HOSTILITY THAT THE WHOLE WORLD 

Spanish: 
LAS ELECCIONES.
 EL PRESIDENTE HA ESTADO EN LO 
CORRECTO AL PRESIONAR A CHINA.
 DEBEMOS MOVILIZAR AL RESTO DEL 
MUNDO PARA ENFRENTAR LAS P
POLÍTICAS DE COMERCIO DE CHINA.
 QUISIERA RESPONDER LA OTRA 
PREGUNTA.
 CUANDO VEO ESTAS PERSONAS EN LA
FRONTERA, VEO A MI MADRE, PORQUE
ELLA FUE SEPARADA DE SUS PADRES 
DURANTE EL HOLOCAUSTO EN POL
POLONIA.
 QUE DONALD TRUMP HAGA LO QUE 
ESTÁ SIGUIENDO A ESTOS NIÑOS,  
LO DIGO COMO ALGUIEN QUE 

English: 
IS LOOKING AT WHEN WHAT WE 
SHOULD BE -- 
>> SENATOR, THANK YOU. 
>> -- IS THE STATUE OF LIBERTY 
WHICH BROUGHT MY PARENTS TO THIS
COUNTRY TO BEGIN WITH.
WE NEED TO MAKE A CHANGE. 
>> MR. YANG, ON THE ISSUE OF 
CHINA YOU HAVE EXPRESSED 
CONCERNS ABOUT TECHNOLOGY AND 
TAKING JOBS.
ARE YOU WORRIED ABOUT CHINA?
IF SO, HOW WOULD YOU STAND UP 
AGAINST IT?
>> I WANT TO AGREE THAT I THINK 
RUSSIA IS OUR GREATEST THREAT.
THEY HAVE BEEN HACKING OUR 
DEMOCRACY SUCCESSFULLY, LAUGHING
ABOUT IT FOR THE LAST COUPLE OF 
YEARS.
WE SHOULD FOCUS ON THAT BEFORE 
WE START LOOKING AT OTHERS.
THE TARIFFS AND THE TRADE WAR 
ARE PUNISHING BUSINESSES AND 
PRODUCERS AND WORKERS ON BOTH 
SIDES.
I MET WITH A FARMER IN IOWA WHO 
SPENT SIX YEARS BUILDING UP A 
RELATIONSHIP IN CHINA THAT'S 
DISAPPEARED AND GONE FOREVER.
THE BENEFICIARIES HAVEN'T BEEN 
AMERICAN WORKERS OR PEOPLE IN 
SOUTHEAST ASIA AND OTHER 
PRODUCERS THAT STEPPED INTO THE 
VOID.

Spanish: 
ESCRIBIÓ LA LEY DE INMIGRACIÓN.
>>>  SENADOR.
>>>  SE HA CONVERTIDO A LA F
FRONTERA DE ESTADOS UNIDOS COMO 
UNA  ELEMENTO HOSTIL QUE TODO E 
MUNDO SE DA CUENTA. DEBEMOS S 
GENERAR UN CAMBIO.
>>>  USTED HA EXPRESADO MUCHA 
PREOCUPACIÓN POR LA TECNOLOGÍA, 
LE PREOCUPA ESTO DE CHINA Y CÓMO
LO ENFRENTARÍA. EN 
>>>  CONCUERDO CON QUE RUSIA ES 
NUESTRO RIVAL GEOPOLÍTICO MÁS 
IMPORTANTE.
 DEBEMOS ENFOCARNOS EN ESO  A
ANTES DE ENFOCARNOS DE OTRAS 
AMENAZAS.
 EL TEMA DE PROPIEDAD I
INTELECTUAL ES UN PROBLEMA I
IMPORTANTE, PERO LOS ARANCELES
TAMBIÉN. ME REUNÍ CON UN G
GRANJERO DE AG QUE TRABAJÓ M
MUCHÍSIMO PARA GENERAR 
RELACIONES COMERCIALES CON CHINA
Y QUE ESO DESAPARECIÓ DE IN

English: 
WE NEED TO CRACK DOWN ON CHINESE
MALFEASANCE IN THE TRADE 
RELATIONSHIP AND THE TARIFFS AND
THE TRADE WAR ARE THE WRONG WAY 
TO GO.
>> MAYOR BUTTIGIEG, HOW WOULD 
YOU STAND UP AGAINST CHINA?
>> WE HAVE TO RECOGNIZE THE 
CHINA CHALLENGE IS A SERIOUS 
ONE.
THIS ISN'T ONE TO DISMISS OR 
WAVE AWAY.
IF YOU LOOK AT WHAT CHINA IS 
DOING, THEY ARE USING TECHNOLOGY
FOR THE PERFECTION OF 
DICTATORSHIP.
THEIR FUNDAMENTAL ECONOMIC MODEL
WON'T CHANGE BECAUSE OF TARIFFS.
FOLKS WHO AREN'T IN THE SHADOW 
OF A FACTORY OR NEAR A SOY FIELD
WHERE I LIVE.
MANUFACTURERS AND SOY FARMERS 
ARE HURTING.
AMERICANS PAY $800 MORE A YEAR 
BECAUSE OF TARIFFS.
CHINA IS INVESTING SO THEY COULD
SOON RUN CIRCLES AROUND US IN 
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE.
THIS PRESIDENT IS FIXATED ON THE
CHINA RELATIONSHIP AS IF ALL 
THAT MATTERED WAS THE EXPORT 
BALANCE ON DISHWASHERS.
WE HAVE A BIGGER ISSUE ON OUR 

Spanish: 
INMEDIATO.
 HAY PRODUCTORES QUE QUEDARON 
INDEFENSOS. DEBEMOS PRESIONAR.
>>>  ALCALDE BUTTIGIEG, ¿ CÓMO 
LO HARÍA USTED?
>>>  DEBEMOS RECONOCER QUE EL 
DESAFÍO DE CHINA ES GRAVE.
 NO ES ALGO QUE DEBEMOS D
DESESTIMAR. SI ANALIZAMOS LO QUE
ESTÁ HACIENDO CHINA, ESTÁN 
UTILIZANDO LA TECNOLOGÍA PARA 
PERFECCIONAR A LOS DICTADORES.
 YO VIVÍ EN EL MEDIO OESTE 
INDUSTRIAL.
 PERSONAS QUE ESTÁN EN UNA FÁ
FÁBRICA O EN UN CAMPO DE SOYA, 
EN ESPECIAL ESTAS SON LAS 
PERSONAS LASTIMADAS. LOS AR
ARANCELES ESTÁN LASTIMÁNDOLOS. 
POR OTRO LADO, CHINA ESTÁ 

Spanish: 
INVIRTIENDO PARA PODER 
SORTEARNOS EN TÉRMINOS DE 
INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL.
 ESTE ES UN TEMA MÁS IMPORTANTE.
PERO CUANDO SU MODELO 
AUTORITARIO SE MANTIENE COMO UNA
ALTERNATIVA DEBIDO QUE LO 
NUESTRO SE VE CAÓTICO, LO QUE 
DEBEMOS HACER VERTIR EN LA 
COMPETITIVIDAD INTERNA. SI NO LO
HACEMOS, NO PODEMOS COMPETIR CON
ELLOS.
 DEBEMOS DEMOSTRAR QUE ESTO NOS 
PREOCUPA.
>>>  GRACIAS.
>>>  VAMOS A UNA PEQUEÑA PAUSA.
 LUEGO SEGUIREMOS CON LAS PR
PREGUNTAS DE MIS COLEGAS.
 YA VOLVEMOS.
(MÚSICA).

English: 
HANDS.
AT THE MOMENT WHEN THEIR 
AUTHORITARIAN MODEL IS AN 
ALTERNATIVE TO OURS BECAUSE OURS
IS CHAOS COMPARED TO THEIRS 
BECAUSE OF OUR INTERNAL DIVISION
THE BIG THING WE HAVE TO DO IS 
INVEST IN OUR OWN DOMESTIC 
COMPETITIVENESS.
IF WE -- 
>> THANK YOU. 
>> IN OUR OWN INFRASTRUCTURE, 
EDUCATION WE WILL NEVER BE ABLE 
TO COMPETE.
IF WE WANT TO BE A DEMOCRATIC 
ALTERNATIVE WE ACTUALLY HAVE TO 
DEMONSTRATE WE CARE ABOUT 
DEMOCRATIC VALUES AT HOME AND 
AROUND THE WORLD. 
>> THANK YOU.
>> WE'RE GOING TO TAKE A QUICK 
BREAK.
LET ME COME BACK WITH CHUCK TODD
AND RACHEL MADDOW.
MUCH MORE WITH THE CANDIDATES 
AHEAD.
CHUCK TODD, RACHEL MADDOW WILL 

English: 
BE HERE, MUCH MORE WITH OUR 
CANDIDATES STRAIGHT AHEAD.
2

Spanish: 
(MÚSICA).
(MÚSICA).
(MÚSICA).

English: 
(MU
>>> WELCOME BACK TO THE 
DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES 
IN MIAMI. 
>> AS WE CONTINUE THE 
QUESTIONING WE WANT TO BRING IN 
MORE MEMBERS OF THE TEAM. 
>> LET'S GO TO CHUCK TODD AND 
RACHEL MADDOW.
[ CHEERS AND APPLAUSE ]
>> RACHEL, I HAD A DREAM THAT WE
HAVE DONE THIS BEFORE. 
>> NO.
THIS IS DEFINITELY THE FIRST 
TIME. 
>> DEFINITELY.
THANK YOU, LESTER, SAVANNAH AND 
JOSE.
LET'S RECAP THE RULES.
20 CANDIDATES QUALIFIED FOR THE 
FIRST DEBATE.
WE HAVE HEARD FROM TEN OF THEM 
LAST NIGHT.
WE HEAR FROM TEN MORE TONIGHT.
BREAKDOWN FOR EACH NIGHT WAS 
SELECTED AT RANDOM.
CANDIDATES HAVE 60 SECONDS TO 
ANSWER DIRECT QUESTIONS, 30 FOR 
FOLLOW UPS IF NECESSARY. 
>> BECAUSE OF THE LARGE FIELD, 
NOT EVERY PERSON CAN BE ABLE TO 
COMMENT ON EVERYTHING, BUT THE 
LESS AUDIENCE REACTION THERE IS,
THE MORE TIME THEY ALL GET.
>> OVER THE COURSE OF THE NEXT 
HOUR WE'LL HEAR FROM ALL OF 
THESE CANDIDATES, BUT WE ARE 
GOING TO BEGIN THIS HOUR WITH 
MAYOR BUTTIGIEG.
IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS CIVIL 
RIGHTS ACTIVISTS HAVE LED A 

Spanish: 
>>
(MÚSICA).
ESCUCHAMOS A 10 ANOCHE Y ESTA 
NOCHE TENEMOS A 10 MÁS.
 LOS CANDIDATOS TIENEN 60 SE
SEGUNDOS PARA RESPONDER, 30 
SEGUNDOS PARA RESPONDER.
>>>  DEBIDO A QUE HAY MUCHOS 
CANDIDATOS.
>>>   NO TODO FUERA GANAR DE 
TODO.

English: 
NATIONAL DEBATE OVER RACE AND 
THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM.
YOUR COMMUNITY OF SOUTH BEND, 
INDIANA, HAS BEEN IN 
INDIANA, HAS BEEN REASONSLY IN 
AN UPROAR OFFER AN 
OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING.
THE POLICE IN SOUTH DAKOTA BEND 
IS NOW 6% BLACK IN A CITY THAT'S
26% BLACK.
WHY HAS THAT NOT IMPROVED OVER 
YOUR TWO TERMS AS MAYOR?
>> BECAUSE I COULDN'T GET IT 
DONE.
MY COMMUNITY IS IN AND WISH 
RIGHT NOW BECAUSE OF AN 
OFFICER-INVOLVED SHOOTING, A 
BLACK MAN, ERIC LOGAN, KILLED BY
A WHITE OFFICER.
I'M NOT ALLOWED TO TAKE SIDES 
UNTIL THE INVESTIGATION COMES 
BACK.
THE OFFICER SAYS HE WAS ATTACKED
AND HE DIDN'T HAVE HIS BODY 
CAMERA ON.
WE'RE HURTING.
I CAN WALK YOU THROUGH ALL THE 
THINGS WE HAVE DONE AS A 
COMMUNITY, ALL OF THE STEPS THAT
WE'VE TOOK FROM BIAS TRAINING TO
DE-ESCALATION BUT IT DIDN'T SAVE
THE LIFE OF ERIC LOGAN, AND WHEN
I LOOK INTO HIS MOTHER'S EYES, I
HAVE TO FACE THE FACT AND 
NOTHING THAT I SAY WILL BRING 
HIM BACK.
THIS IS AN ISSUE THAT IS FACING 

Spanish: 
 DURANTE LA PRÓXIMA HORA LOS 
ESCUCHAREMOS A TODOS. VAMOS A 
COMENZAR CON EL ALCALDE BUT
BUTTIGIEG. DURANTE LOS ÚLTIMOS 
CINCO AÑOS EL ACTIVISMO HA 
GENERADO DEBATE SOBRE EL SISTEMA
PENAL Y RAZA, EN INDIANA HA 
HABIDO MUCHOS PROBLEMAS POR 
OFICIALES Y TIROTEOS.
 LA FUERZA POLICIAL TIENE UN 6% 
DE OFICIALES, POR QUÉ NO HA 
MEJORADO?
>>> NO LO LOGRÉ.
 NUESTRA COMUNIDAD ESTÁ 
ANGUSTIADA POR EL TIROTEO EN EL 
QUE HUBO UN OFICIAL INVOLUCRADO.
YO NO PUEDO ABANDERARME CON 
NADIE.
 EL OFICIAL DICE QUE FUE ATACADO
CON UN CUCHILLO, PERO SU CÁMARA 
ESTABA APAGADA. ES UN DESASTRE. 
LES CONTARÉ TODO LO QUE HEMOS 
HECHO. TODOS LOS AVANCES QUE 
HEMOS LOGRADO.
 PERO ESO NO LE SALVÓ LA VIDA A 

Spanish: 
LOGAN. CUANDO VEO A SU MADRE, 
DEBO ENFRENTAR EL HECHO DE QUE
NADA BÉLIC DE LO QUERÍA, LO HAÁ 
REVIVIR.
 HASTA QUE SAQUEMOS A LA POLICÍA
DEL RACISMO SISTÉMICO, 
ENFRENTAREMOS EL PROBLEMA MÁS 
GRAVE. HAY UNA MURALLA DE 
DESCONFIANZA, NO SOLO POR LO QUE
SUCEDIÓ EN EL PASADO, SINO LO 
QUE ESTÁ SUCEDIENDO AHORA.
 ESTOY DETERMINADO A QUE ESTO 
TERMINE. CUANDO UNA PERSONA 
CONDUCE UN VEHÍCULO O UNA 
PERSONA AFROAMERICANA SIENTAN 
EXACTAMENTE LO MISMO. QUE NO 
SIENTA MIEDO.
 ESOS LO QUE QUIERO.
>>>  GRACIAS, ALCALDE.
>>>  TIENE 30 SEGUNDOS.
>>>  ESA PREGUNTA DEBE SER R

English: 
OUR COMMUNITY AND SO MANY 
COMMUNITIES AROUND THE COUNTRY, 
AND UNTIL WE MOVE POLITICIAN OUT
FROM THE SHADOW OF SYSTEMIC 
RACISM, WHATEVER THIS PARTICULAR
INCIDENT TEACHES US, WE'LL LEFT 
WITH A BIGGER PROBLEM OF THE 
FACT THAT THERE'S A WALL OF 
MISTRUST, PUT UP ONE RACIST ACT 
AT A TIME, NOT JUST WHAT HAS 
HAPPENED IN THE PAST BUT WHAT'S 
HAPPENING AROUND THE COUNTRY IN 
THE PRESENT.
IT'S THREATENED THE WELL-BEING 
OF EVERY COMMUNITY AND I'M 
DETERMINE TO BRING ABOUT A DAY 
WHEN A WHITE PERSON DRIVING A 
VEHICLE AND A BLACK PERSON 
DRIVING A VEHICLE, WHEN THEY SEE
A POLICE OFFICER FEEL THE EXACT 
SAME THING, A FEELING OF SAFETY 
NOT FEAR. 
>> THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. 
>> IF I COULD ASK YOU ONE 
QUESTION. 
>> I'LL GIVE YOU 30 SECONDS. 
>> THE QUESTION THAT THEY ARE 
ASKING IN SOUTH BEND AND ACROSS 
THE COUNTRY IS WHY HAS IT TAKEN 
SO LONG?
WE HAD A SHOOTING WHEN I FIRST 
BECAME MAYOR, STEP YEARS BEFORE 

Spanish: 
RESPONDIDA CON POR QUÉ HA 
DEMORADO TANTO.
 NUESTRA COMUNIDAD SE UNIÓ 
CUANDO DIFERENCIA UBICAMOS A LA 
POLICÍA, GENERAMOS ENTRENAMIENTO
PARA CALMAR LAS SITUACIONES.
>>>  GOBERNADOR.
>>>  TENGO QUE RESPONDER.
>>>  HEMOS AVANZADO MUCHO PARA 
QUE LA POLICÍA SE RESPONSABLE DE
SUS ACTOS.
 OBVIAMENTE NO LO HEMOS LOGRADO 
AÚN.
>>>  DEBIÓ HABER DESPEDIDO AL 
JEFE DE POLICÍA.
>>>  BAJO LA LEY SERÁ 
INVESTIGADO.
>>>  USTED DEBERÍA DESPEDIRLO.
>>>  ESTOS TEMAS SON 
IMPORTANTES, PERO SON SÍNTOMAS, 
LA CAUSA SUBYACENTE TIENE QUE 

English: 
FERGUSON AND THE COMMUNITY GAME 
TOGETHER AND WE CREATED AN 
OVERSIGHT COMMISSION AND 
DIVERSEIFIED POLICE FORCE IN TWO
YEARS AND DID DE-ESCALATION 
TRAINING.
I THINK THE REAL QUESTION THAT 
AMERICA IS ASKING IS WHY FIVE 
YEARS AFTER FERGUSON EVERY CITY 
DOESN'T HAVE THIS LEVEL OF 
POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY?
>> GOVERNOR HICKENLOOPER. 
>> I'VE GOT TO RESPOND TO THAT. 
>> LOOK, WE'VE TAKEN THAT MANY 
STEPS TOWARDS POLICE 
ACCOUNTABILITY THAT THE SOP JUST
SAID THERE'S TOO MUCH 
ACCOUNTABILITY AND WE'RE 
DEFINITELY NOT THERE YET AND I 
ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY.
SO UNDER INDIANA LAW THIS WILL 
BE INVESTIGATED, AND THERE WILL 
BE ACCOUNTABILITY INVOLVED. 
>> IF YOU'RE THE MAYOR FIRE THE 
CHIEF.
IF THAT'S THE POLICY WHEN SUN 
DIES. 
>> ALL OF THESE ISSUES ARE 
EXTREMELY IMPORTANT.
THEY ARE SYMPTOMS AND THE 
UNDERLYING CAUSE HAS TO DO WITH 
DEEP, DEEP GROUNDS OF RACIAL 
INJUSTICE AND IN OUR CRIMINAL 
JUSTICE SYSTEM AND ECONOMIC 
SYSTEM AND THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY 
SHOULD ON THE SIDE OF 
REPARATIONS FOR SLAVERY FOR THIS
VERY REASON.

English: 
I DO NOT BELIEVE -- I DO NOT 
BELIEVE THAT THE AVERAGE 
AMERICAN IS A RACIST, BUT 
AVERAGE AMERICAN IS WILLFULLY 
UNDEREDUCATED ABOUT THE HISTORY 
RACE IN THE UNITED STATES. 
>> I'M GOING -- WE'RE GOING TO 
GET TO YOU. 
>> I WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THE 
ISSUE OF RATS.
>> SENATOR HAITIAN AND WHAT I 
WOULD SAY -- WE'LL GIVE YOU 30 
SECONDS AND WE'RE GOING TO COME 
BACK TO YOU ON THIS IN A MOMENT.
GO FOR 30 SECONDS. 
>> OKAY.
SO ON THE ISSUE OF RACE I 
COULDN'T AGREE MORE THAT THIS IS
AN ISSUE THAT IS STILL NOT BEING
TALKED ABOUT TRUTHFULLY AND 
HONESTLY.
THERE'S NOT A BLACK MAN I KNOW 
BEY HAD A RELATIVE, A FRIEND OR 
CO-WALKER WHO HAS NOT BEEN THE 
SUBJECT OF SOME SORT OF 
PROFILING OR DISCRIMINATION.
GROWING UP MY SISTER AND I HAD 
TO DEAL WITH THE NEIGHBOR WHO 
TELL US SHE COULDN'T PLAY WITH 
US BECAUSE WE WERE BLACK AND I 
WOULD SAY ALSO THAT EVEN IN THIS
CAMPAIGN WE'VE ALSO HEARD, AND 

Spanish: 
VER CON INJUSTICIA RACIAL.  TANO
NO SISTEMA ECONÓMICO COMO EN N
NUESTRO SISTEMA JUDICIAL.,
 NO CREO QUE EL ESTADOUNIDENSE 
PROMEDIO SEA RACISTA, SINO QUE 
TIENEN POCA EDUCACIÓN AL RE
RESPECTO.
>>>  VICEPRESIDENTE BIDEN.
>>>  QUISIERA HABLAR.
(APLAUSOS). 
(APLAUSOS). 
>>>  SENADORA HARRIS.
>>>  TIENE 30 SEGUNDOS.
>>>  EN CUANTO AL TEMA RACIAL, 
ESTOY COMPLETAMENTE DE ACUERDO 
CON QUE ESTE ES UN TEMA CON EL 
QUE NO SE HABLA REALMENTE.
 CRÉDITO DE LA GENTE ES PARTE DE
ESTE TIPO DE DISCRIMINACIÓN.
 CUANDO YO ERA PEQUEÑA UN VECINO

Spanish: 
ME DIJO QUE NO PODÍA JUGAR CON 
NOSOTRAS PORQUE ÉRAMOS AFR
AFROAMERICANAS.
 AHORA ESTO SE LO DIGO AL PRE
PRESIDENTE BIDEN.
 NO CREO QUE USTED SEA RACISTA, 
ESTOY DE ACUERDO CON USTED 
CUANDO USTED CEDE PARA ENCONTRAR
TERRENO COMÚN.
 PARA MÍ FUE MUY DOLOROSO ES
ESCUCHARLO HABLAR DE LA REP
REPUTACIÓN DE DOS SENADORES QUE 
CONSTRUYERON SU REPUTACIÓN Y 
CARRERAS EN LA BASE DE LA SEG
SEGREGACIÓN RACIAL EN EL PAÍS.
 NO SOLO ESO, SINO QUE TAMBIÉN 
TRABAJO CON ELLOS PARA PONERSE A
BUSSING,.

English: 
I'M GOING TO NOW DIRECT THIS AT 
VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN, I DO NOT 
BELIEVE YOU HAD A RACIST, AND I 
AGREE WITH YOU WHEN YOU COMMIT 
YOURSELF TO THE IMPORTANCE OF 
FINDING COMMON GROUND, BUT I 
ALSO BELIEVE, AND IT'S PERSONAL,
AND IT WAS ACTUALLY VERY 
HURTFUL, TO HEAR YOU TALK ABOUT 
THE REPUTATIONS OF TWO UNITED 
STATES SENATORS WHO BUILT THEIR 
REPUTATION AND CAREER ON 
SEGREGATION OF RACE IN THIS 
COUNTRY, AND IT WAS NOT ONLY 
THAT BUT YOU ALSO WORKED WITH 
THEM TO OPPOSE BUSING, AND, YOU 
KNOW, THERE WAS A LITTLE GIRL IN
CALIFORNIA WHO WAS PART OF THE 
SECOND CLASS TO INTEGRATE INTO 
PUBLIC SCHOOLS AND SHE WAS 
BUSSED TO SCHOOL EVERY DAY, AND 
THAT LITTLE GIRL WAS ME SO I 
WILL TELL YOU THAT ON THIS 
SUBJECT IT CANNOT BE AN 
INTELLECTUAL DEBATE AMONG 
DEMOCRATS.

English: 
WE HAVE TO TAKE IT SERIOUSLY.
WE HAVE TO ACT SWIFTLY.
AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF 
CALIFORNIA I WAS VERY PROUD TO 
PUT IN PLACE A REQUIREMENT THAT 
ALL MY SPECIALATES WOULD WEAR 
BODY CAMERAS AND KEEP THOSE 
CAMERAS ON.
>> SENATOR HARRIS, THANK YOU. 
>> VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN, YOU 
HAVE BEEN INVOKED.
WE'RE GOING TO GIVE YOU A CHANCE
TO RESPOND.
VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN.
>> THAT'S THE A 
MISCHARACTERIZATION OF POSITION 
ACROSS THE BOARD.
I DO NOT PARADES RACIST, THAT'S 
NOT NUMBER NUMBER ONE.
NUMBER TWO, IF WE WANT TO HAVE 
THIS CAMPAIGN LITIGATED ON WHO 
SUPPORTS CIVIL RIGHTS I'M HAPPY 
TO DO THAT.
I WAS A PUBLIC DEFENDER.
I DIDN'T BECOME A PROSECUTOR.
I CAME OUT AND LEFT A GOOD LAW 
FIRM TO BECOME A PUBLIC 
DEFENDER.
WHEN IN FACT -- WHEN IN FACT -- 
WHEN IN FACT MY CITY WAS 
ENSLAVED BECAUSE OF THE 
ASSASSINATION OF MARTIN LUTHER 
KING, NUMBER UP WITH.

Spanish: 
 UNA PEQUEÑA NIÑA IBAN BUS A LA 
ESCUELA SIEMPRE, ERA YO.
 EN ESE TEMA EN PARTICULAR NO 
PUEDE HABER UN DEBATE 
INTELECTUAL, DEBEMOS TOMARLO EN 
SERIO,  DEBEMOS ACTUAR RÁPIDO,.
 COMO FISCAL GENERAL DE 
CALIFORNIA ME ENORGULLECE HABER 
OBLIGADO A LOS OFICIALES A 
MANTENER SUS CÁMARAS ENCENDIDAS.
>>>  VICEPRESIDENTE BIDEN,  
PUEDE RESPONDER.
 ADELANTE.
(APLAUSOS). 
(APLAUSOS). 
(APLAUSOS). 
>>>  SE ESTÁS TERGIVERSANDO MI 
POSICIÓN.
 YO NO A LA B EL RACISMO.
 SEGUNDO, PODEMOS TENER ESTE D
DEBATE. YO ERA DEFENSOR PÚBLICO,
ME CONVERTÍ EN DEFENSOR PÚBLICO,
NUEVE FISCAL.

Spanish: 
 CUANDO MI CIUDAD ESTABA EN 
LLAMAS DEBIDO AL ASESINATO DEL 
DOCTOR KING.
 COMO VICEPRESIDENTE TRABAJÉ 
COMOC 
CON UN HOMBRE CON EL QUE Q
QUISIMOS TRANSFORMAR ESTO.
 EN RELACIÓN AL TRANSPORTE, 
USTED PODÍA IR AL BUS PORQUE ERA
UNA DECISIÓN LOCAL,  ESO ESTÁ 
BIEN.
 ESOS LO QUE QUERÍAMOS,.
 EL PUNTO CENTRAL AQUÍ ES QUE 
TODO LO QUE HE HECHO EN MI C
CARRERA ES QUE DEFENDÍ LOS 
DERECHOS CIVILES Y ESO INCLUÍA A
LOS ESTADOUNIDENSES, A LA C
COMUNIDAD LGBTQ,.
>>> ¿ USTED CONCUERDA AL MOMENTO
EN QUE LE DIGO QUE SE EQUIVOCÓ?

English: 
NUMBER TWO, AS THE VICE 
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES I
WORKED WITH A MAN WHO IN FACT WE
WORKED VERY HARD TO SEE TO IT, 
THAT WE DEALT WITH THESE ISSUES 
IN A MAJOR MAJOR WAY.
THE FACT IS THAT IN TERMS OF 
BHUSING, THE BUSING -- YOU WOULD
HAVE BEEN ABLE TO GO TO SCHOOL 
THE SAME EXACT WAY BECAUSE IT 
WAS A LOCAL DECISION MADE BY 
YOUR CITY COUNCIL.
THAT'S FINE.
THAT'S ONE OF THE THINGS ARGUED 
FOR THAT WE SHOULD BE BREAKING 
DOWN THESE LINES, SO THE BOTTOM 
LINE HERE IS, LOOK, EVERYTHING 
I'VE COMMON MY CAREER, I RAN 
BECAUSE OF CIVIL RIGHTS, I 
CONTINUE TO THINK THAT WE HAVE 
TO MAKE FUNDAMENTAL CHANGES IN 
CIVIL RIGHTS AND THOSE CIVIL 
RIGHTS INCLUDE NOT ONLY 
AFRICAN-AMERICANS BUT LBGTQ 
COMMUNITY. 
>> VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN, DO YOU 
AGREE TODAY -- DO YOU AGREE 
TODAY THAT YOU WERE WRONG TO 
OPPOSE BUSING IN AMERICA THEN?
>> NO. 
>> DO YOU AGREE?
>> I DID NOT OPPOSE BUSSING IN 
AMERICA.
WHAT I OPPOSED WAS BUGS ORDERED 
BY THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.
THAT'S WHAT I OPPOSED.

Spanish: 
>>>  NO ME OPUSE A ESTO EN EL 
PAÍS, SINO  A QUE EL D
DEPARTAMENTO DE EDUCACIÓN LO  
INSTAURARÁ.
>>>  YO ERA PARTE DE LA SEGUNDA 
CLASE DE INTEGRACIÓN CASI DOS 
DÉCADAS DESPUÉS.
>>>  POR QUÉ EN SU CIUDAD SE T
TOMÓ ESA DECISIÓN.
>>>  EL GOBIERNO FEDERAL DEBIÓ 
HABER ACTUADO.
 ES POR ESO QUE DEBE SER 
APROBADA EL ACTA DE EQUIDAD,.
 HAY MOMENTOS DE LA HISTORIA EN 
QUE LOS ESTADOS NO PROTEGE LOS 
DERECHOS.
>>>  30 SEGUNDOS, VICEPR
VICEPRESIDENTE.
>>>  LO APOYÉ DESDE UN COMIENZO.
 EXTENDÍ EL ACTA DE VOTACIÓN 
DURANTE 35 AÑOS.
 LO LOGRAMOS CON TODO EL SENADO 

English: 
I DID NOT OPPOSE -- 
>> IT'S A FAIL YOU'RE STATES 
TO -- I WAS PART OF THE SECOND 
CLASS TO INTEGRATE BERKELEY, 
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS ALMOST
TWO DECADES AFTER BROWN V. BOARD
OF EDUCATION. 
>> BECAUSE YOUR CITY COUNCIL 
MADE THAT DECISION. 
>> SO THAT'S WHY THE FEDERAL 
GOVERNMENT MUST STEP IN.
THAT'S WHY WE HAVE THE VOTING 
RIGHTS ACT AND THE CIVIL RIGHTS 
ACT.
THAT'S WHY WE NEED TO PASS THE 
EQUALITY ACT AND THAT'S WHY WE 
NEED TO PASS THE ERA BECAUSE 
THERE ARE MOMENTS IN HISTORY IN 
WHICH STATES FAIL TO PRESERVE 
THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF ALL PEOPLE. 
>> I'VE SPOTTED THE E.R.A. FROM 
THE VERY BEGINNING. 
>> 0 SECONDS. 
>> I WANT TO BRING OTHER PEOPLE 
INTO THIS. 
>> I SUPPORTED THE E.R.A. FROM 
THE VERY BEGINNING.
I'M THE GUY WHO EXTENDED THE 
VOTING RIGHTS ACT FOR 25 YEARS.
WE GOT TO THE PLACE WHERE WE GOT
98 OUT OF 92 VOTES IN THE UNITED
STATES SENATE DOING IT.
I'VE ALSO ARGUED VERY STRONGLY 
THAT WE IN FACT DEAL WITH THE 
NOTION OF DENYING PEOPLE ACCESS 
TO THE BALLOT BOX.
I AGREED THAT EVERYBODY WANTS --
ANYWAY.
MY TIME IS UP, I'M SORRY. 
>> THANK YOU, VICE PRESIDENT. 

English: 
>> ALL OF THESE THINGS -- 
>> SENATOR SANDERS, I'M GOING TO
GO.
YOU SAID ON THE DAY YOU LAUNCHED
YOUR CAMPAIGN THAT VOTERS SHOULD
FOCUS ON WHAT PEOPLE STAND FOR, 
NOT A CANDIDATE'S RACE OR AGE OR
SEXUAL ORIENTATION.
MANY DEMOCRATS ARE VERY EXCITED 
BY THE DIVERSITY OF THIS FIELD, 
ON THIS STAGE AND ON LAST 
NIGHT'S STAGE AND THE 
PROSPECTIVE THAT DIVERSITY 
BRINGS TO THE CONTEST AND TO 
THESE ISSUES.
ARE YOU TELLING DEMOCRATIC 
VOTERS THAT DIVERSITY SHOULDN'T 
MATTER WHEN THEY MAKE THIS 
DECISION?
>> NO, ABSOLUTELY NOT.
UNLIKE THE REPUBLICAN PARTY, WE 
ENCOURAGE DIVERSITY.
WE BELIEVE IN DIVERSITY.
THAT'S WHAT AMERICA IS ABOUT, 
BUT IN ADDITION TO THE 
DIVERSITY.
IN TERMS OF HAVING MORE WOMEN, 
MORE PEOPLE FROM THE LBGT 
COMMUNITY, WE ALSO HAVE TO DO 
SOMETHING ELSE, AND THAT IS WE 
HAVE TO ASK OURSELVES A SIMPLE 
QUESTION, AND THAT'S HOW COME 

Spanish: 
Y LUCHE CON LA NOCIÓN DE QUE SE 
LE NEGARA EL DERECHO A VOTO A 
LAS PERSONAS.
>>>  GRACIAS, VICEPRESIDENTE.
>>>  SENADOR SANDERS.
 USTED DIJO EL DÍA DE 
LANZAMIENTO DE SU CAMPAÑA QUE 
LOS VOTANTES DEBEN ENFOCARSE EN 
LO QUE DEFIENDE LA GENTE,  NO LA
ORIENTACIÓN SEXUAL, EDAD  OTROS.
 A MUCHOS LES EMOCIONA LA 
DIVERSIDAD DE LOS CANDIDATOS Y 
EL PROSPECTO QUE ESTO TRAERÍA A 
ESTOS PROBLEMAS.
¿ LE DECIMOS A LOS VOTANTES QUE 
LA DIVERSIDAD NO DEBEN PORTAR?
>>>  NO, PARA NADA. A DIFERENCIA
DEL PARTIDO REPUBLICANO, POT
POTENCIAMOS LA DIVERSIDAD, 
CREEMOS EN LA DIVERSIDAD, DE ESO
SE TRATAN OTRO PAÍS,  PERO 
ADEMÁS DE LA DIVERSIDAD, EN 
TÉRMINOS DE TENER MÁS MUJERES, 
MÁS PERSONA DE LA COMUNIDAD L

English: 
TODAY THE WORKER IN THE MIDDLE 
OF OUR ECONOMY IS MAKING NO MORE
MONEY THAN HE OR SHE MADE 45 
YEARS AGO AND THAT IN THE LAST 
30 YEARS THE TOP 1% HAS SEEN A 
$21 TRILLION INCREASE IN THEIR 
WEALTH.
WE NEED A PARTY THAT'S DIVERSE 
AND WE NEED A PARTY THAT HAS THE
GUTS TO STAND UP TO THE POWERFUL
SPECIAL INTERESTS WHO HAVE SO 
MUCH POWER OVER THE ECONOMIC AND
POLITICAL LIFE OF THIS COUNTRY. 
>> SENATOR GILL BRAND, I WANT TO
GIVE YOU 30 SECONDS. 
>> FIRST OFF, WHERE BERNIE LEFT 
OFF.
YOU'VE HEARD A LOT OF GOOD IDEAS
ON THIS STAGE TONIGHT AND A LOT 
OF PLANS, BUT THE TRUTH IS THE 
UNTIL YOU GO TO THE ROOT OF THE 
CORRUPTION, THE MONEY IN 
POLITICS, THE FACT THAT 
WASHINGTON IS RUN BY THE SPECIAL
INTERESTS, YOU ARE NEVER GOING 
TO SOLVE ANY OF THESE PROBLEMS.
I HAVE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE 
APPROACH THAT EXPERTS BELIEVE IS
THE MOST TRANSFORMATIVE PLAN TO 
ACTUALLY TAKE ON POLITICAL 
CORRUPTION, TO GET MONEY OUT OF 
POLITICS TO PUBLICLY FUNDED 
ELECTIONS AND HAVE CLEAN 
ELECTIONS.

Spanish: 
LGTBQ,  TENEMOS QUE HACER ALGO 
MÁS. PREGUNTARNOS LO SIGUIENTE.
¿ CÓMO ES QUE EL TRABAJADOR NO 
ESTÁ GANANDO MÁS DINERO QUE LO 
QUE GANABA HACE 30 AÑOS Y QUE EN
LOS ÚLTIMOS 30 AÑOS EL 1% MÁS 
RICO HA VISTO UN INCREMENTO 
BRUTAL?
 NECESITAMOS UN PARTIDDIVERSO,
PERO CON LAS AGALLAS DE 
ENFRENTARSE A LOS INTERESES 
ESPECIALES QUE TIENEN EL PODER
SOBRE LAS RAMAS ECONÓMICAS Y 
POLÍTICAS DEL PAÍS.
>>>  HEMOS ESCUCHADO MUCHAS 
BUENAS IDEAS AQUÍ,  PERO LA 
VERDAD ES QUE HASTA QUE VAMOS A 
LA RAÍZ DE LOS PROBLEMAS, EL 
DINERO EN LA POLÍTICA, EL HECHO 
DE QUE WASHINGTON ES MANEJADO 
POR LOS INTERESES ESPECIALES.
 YO TUVE EL ENFOQUE MÁS 

Spanish: 
COMPLETO, EL PLA MÁS TRANSF
TRANSFORMADOR PARA LA CORRUPCIÓN
POLÍTICA. PARA LOGRAR SACAR EL 
DINERO DE LA POLÍTICA, PARA 
TENER ELECCIONES LIMPIAS.
 SI LOGRAMOS HACERLO, PODEMOS 
GARANTIZAR LA EDUCACIÓN, 
ENFRENTAR EL RACISMO, LA I
INEQUIDAD, LA CORRUPCIÓN 
CORPORATIVA DE WASHINGTON.
>>>  ESO FUE INTRODUCIDO POR MI 
PERSONA.
>>>  SENADOR BENNETT.
 EN CUANTO A CUANDO NO HAY 
AVANCE CON LOS PARTIDOS,  SE 
PROMETIÓ QUE SE IBA A TRABAJAR Y
NO SUCEDIÓ, EL VICEPRESIDENTE 
DICE LO MISMO, DICE QUE AMBOS 
PARTIDOS QUERRÁN TRABAJAR 
JUNTOS.
¿ LOS VOTANTES DEBEN CREER QUE 
SI HAY UN PRESIDENTE DEMÓCRATA 
ESTO DESAPARECERÁ?>>
>>>  NO DESAPARECERÁ MIENTRAS 
MIS MCCONNELL ESTÉ AHÍ.

English: 
IF WE DO THAT AND GET MONEY OUT 
OF HEALTHCARE, WE CAN HAVE 
HEALTHCARE AND TAKE ON 
INSTITUTIONAL RACISM AND TAKE ON
THE CORPORATE -- 
>> THE FIRST CONGRESSMAN TO DO 
THAT WAS ME WHEN I WAS A YOUNG 
CONGRESSMAN. 
>> ON THE ISSUE OF PARTISAN 
GRIDLOCK.
PRESIDENT OBAMA SAID AFTER HIS 
ELECTION PEOPLE WOULD WANT TO 
WORK WITH REPUBLICANS AND NOW 
VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN IS SAYING 
THE SAME THING, THAT IF HE'S 
ELECTED IN 2020 BOTH PARTIES 
WILL WANT TO WORK TOGETHER.
SHOULD VOTERS BELIEVE THAT 
SOMEHOW IF THERE'S A DEMOCRATIC 
PRESIDENT IN 2021 THAT GRIDLOCK 
IS GOING TO MAGICALLY DISSIPATE?
>> GRIDLOCK WILL NOT MAGICALLY 
DISAPPEAR AS LONG AS MITCH 
McCONNELL IS THERE FIRST.
SECOND, SECOND, THAT'S WHY IT IS
SO IMPORTANT FOR US TO WIN NOT 
JUST THE PRESIDENCY, TO HAVE 
SOMEBODY THAT CAN RUN IN ALL 50 
STATES, BUT TO -- BUT TO WIN THE

English: 
SENATE AS WELL, AND THAT'S WHY 
WE HAVE TO PROPOSE POLICIES THAT
CAN BE SUPPORTED LIKE MEDICARE 
"X" SO THAT WE CAN BUILD A BROAD
COALITION OF AMERICANS TO 
OVERCOME BROKEN WASHINGTON, D.C.
I AGREE WITH WHAT SENATOR 
GILLIBRAND WAS SAYING AND SHARE 
A LOT OF HER VIEWS.
WE NEED TO END GERRYMANDERING IN
WASHINGTON AND WE NEED TO END 
POLITICAL GERRYMANDERING IN 
WASHINGTON.
THE COURT TODAY SAID THEY 
COULDN'T DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT.
WE NEED TO OVERTURN CITIZENS 
UNIT.
THE COURT WAS THE ONE THAT GAVE 
US CITIZENS UNITED, AND THE 
ATTACK ON INVESTIGATE RIGHTS IN 
SHELBY VERSUS HOMER IS SOMETHING
THAT WE NEED TO DEAL WITH.
ALL OF THOSE THINGS HAVE 
HAPPENED SINCE VICE PRESIDENT 
BIDEN WAS IN THE SENATE, AND 
WE'VE FACED STRUCTURAL PROBLEMS 
THAT WE HAVE TO OVERCOME WITH A 
BROAD COALITION.
IT'S THE ONLY WAY WE CAN DO IT.
WE NEED TO ROOT OUT THE 
CORRUPTION IN WASHINGTON AND 
EXPAND PEOPLE'S RIGHTS TO GET TO
POLLS AND I THINK THAT WE CAN 
SUCCEED. 
>> VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN, 30 
SECONDS.
WHAT -- IT DOES SOUND AS IF YOU 
HAVEN'T SEEN WHAT'S BEEN 

Spanish: 
 POR ESO ES TAN IMPORTANTE GANAR
NO SOLO LA PRESIDENCIA, SINO 
GANAR EL SENADO.
 DEBEMOS PROPONER POLÍTICAS QUE 
PUEDA SER AVALADAS COMO MEDICARE
PARA GENERAR UNA GRAN COALICIÓN 
PARA ENFRENTAR A WASHINGTON.
 CONCUERDO CON LO QUE DIJO LA 
SENADORA GILLIBRAND.
 NECESITAMOS HACER ESTO.
 LAS CORTES SON LAS QUE NOS 
DIERAN CITIZEN UNITED.
 ES ALGO QUE DEBEMOS HACER. T
TODOS ESOS ELEMENTOS SUCEDIERON 
DESDE QUE EL VICEPRESIDENTE B
BIDEN ESTABA EN EL SENADO.
 ENFRENTAMOS PROBLEMAS ESTRU
ESTRUCTURALES QUE DEBEMOS 
RESOLVER CON UNA GRAN COALICIÓN,
ES LA ÚNICA MANERA DE HACERLO.
 DEBEMOS ELIMINARLA CON ADORNOS 
JONG EN WASHINGTON.

Spanish: 
>>>  30 SEGUNDOS, VICEPRESIDENTE
BIDEN.
 PARECIERA QUE USTED NO HA VISTO
LO QUE SUCEDE EN EL PAÍS DURANTE
LOS ÚLTIMOS 12 AÑOS.
>>>  ESTOY ATENTO A ESO.
 NECESITAMOS TRES VOTOS PARA 
APROBAR ESTO.
 LOGRÉ ESE CAMBIO.
 NECESITÁBAMOS EVITAR QUE EL 
GOBIERNO FUERA PARALIZADO, LOGÉE
QUE MITCH MCCONNELL APROBARA 
ESTE PRESUPUESTO.
 $600,000,000.
 ALGUNAS VECES NO SE LOGRA, A 
VECES HAY QUE VENCERLOS. ESTUVE 
EN 20 ESTADOS Y ADIVINEN QUÉ, 
LES VENCIMOS
>>>  EL PROBLEMA--
>>>  30 SEGUNDOS.
>>> :

English: 
HAPPENING IN THE UNITED STATES 
SENATE OVER THE LAST 12 YEARS.
IT DIDN'T HAPPEN, WHY?
>> I HAVE SEEN WHAT HAPPENED.
JUST SINCE I WAS VICE PRESIDENT.
WE NEEDED THREE VOTES TO PASS AN
$800 BILLION RECOVERY ACT THAT 
KEPT US FROM GOING INTO A 
DEPRESSION.
I GOT THREE VOTES CHANGED.
WE NEEDED TO BE ABLE TO KEEP THE
GOVERNMENT FROM SHUTTING DOWN 
AND GOING BANKRUPT.
I GOT MITCH McCONNELL TO RAISE 
TAXES $600 BILLION BY RAISING 
THE TOP RATE, AND AS RECENTLY 
AFTER THE PRESIDENT GOT ELECTED 
I WAS ABLE TO PUT TOGETHER A 
COALITION THAT BILLIONS OF 
DOLLARS GO INTO CANCER RESEARCH,
BIPARTISAN, BUT SOMETIMES YOU 
CAN'T DO THAT.
SOMETIMES YOU'VE GOT TO GO OUT 
AND BEAT THEM.
I WENT INTO 20 STATES, OVER 60 
CANDIDATES AND GUESS WHAT, WE 
BEAT THEM.
WE WON BACK THE SENATE. 
>> THANK YOU. 
>> CHUCK, THE PROBLEM WITH WHAT 
THE VICE PRESIDENT -- 
>> 30 SECONDS, GO AHEAD. 
>> SOMETIMES YOU DO HAVE TO BEAT
THEM, BUT THE DEAL THAT HE 
TALKED ABOUT WITH MITCH 
McCONNELL WAS A COMPLETE VICTORY

Spanish: 
>>>  A VECES HAY QUE VENCERLOS, 
PERO LO QUE MENCIONÓ CON MITCH 
MCCONNELL FUE UNA VICTORIA PARA 
EL PARTIDO.
 EXTENDIÓ EL IMPUESTO DE BUSH 
PERMANENTEMENTE.
 PERDIMOS E ESE ARGUMENTO PORQU 
SU EXTENDIÓ EL IMPUESTO BUSH Y  
ES ALGO CON LO QUE HASTA EL DÍA 
DE HOY ESTAMOS TRABAJANDO.
 FUE UN MAL ACUERDO.
>>>  ADELANTE.
>>>  LA RAZÓN POR LA REFORMA 
TRIBUTARIA DE TRUMP FUE APROBADA
FUE PORQUE TIENEN QUE PAGARLE A 
LOS DONANTES.
 LA CORRUPCIÓN EN WASHINGTON ES 
REAL Y ES ALGO QUE HACE QUE 
TODOS LOS PLANES QUE HEMOS 
ESCUCHADO SEAN IMPOSIBLES. YO 
TENGO EL PLAN MÁS INTELIGENTE 
PARA TENER ELECCIONES LIMPIAS. 

English: 
FOR THE TEA PARTY.
IT EXTENDED THE BUSH TAX CUTS 
PERMANENTLY.
THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAS BEEN 
RUNNING AGAINST THAT FOR TEN 
YEARS.
WE'VE LOST THAT ECONOMIC 
ARGUMENT BECAUSE THAT DEAL 
EXTEND ALMOST ALL THE BUSH TAX 
CUTS PERMANENTLY AND PUT IN 
PLACE THE MINDLESS CUTS THAT WE 
STILL ARE DEALING WITH TODAY 
THAT ARE CALLED THE SEQUESTER.
THAT WAS A GREAT DEAL FOR 
MR. McCONNELL AND A TERRIBLE 
DEAL FOR AMERICA. 
>> THE REASON THE TRUMP TAX CUTS
WERE PASSED BECAUSE THEY HAD TO 
PAY BACK THE OWNERS, YOU HEARD 
THEM SAY THE WORDS.
THE CORRUPTION IN WASHINGTON IS 
REAL AND MAKES EVERY ONE OF THE 
PLANS THAT WE'VE HEARD ABOUT 
OVER THE NEXT SEVERAL MONTHS 
IMPOSSIBLE AND I HAVE THE MOST 
COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO DO IT 
WITH CLEAN ELECTIONS, PUBLICLY 
FUND ELECTIONS.
WE RESTORE THE POWER OF 
DEMOCRACY INTO THE HANDS OF THE 
VOTERS, NOT INTO THE KOCH 

English: 
BROTHERS.
WE WERE TALKING ABOUT ISSUES.
WE'RE IN FLORIDA, IMAGINE THE 
PARKLAND KIDS HAVING AS MUCH 
POWER IN OUR DEMOCRACY AS THE 
KOCH BROTHERS OR THE NRA.
IMAGINE THEIR VOICES ARE 
CARRYING FARTHER AND WIDER THAN 
ANYONE ELSE BECAUSE THEIR VOICE 
IS NEEDED.
>> SENATOR GILLIBRAND.
THANK YOU. 
>> NOTHING ELSE IS POSSIBLE 
WHETHER IT'S EDUCATION OR 
HEALTHCARE. 
>> I'D LIKE TO PUT A DIFFERENT 
QUESTION TO YOU.
"ROE V. WADE" HAS BEEN THE LAW 
OF THE LAND SINCE 1973.
NOW THAT THERE IS A CONSERVATIVE
MAJORITY ON THE SUPREME COURT 
SEVERAL REPUBLICAN-CONTROLLED 
STATES HAVE PASSED LAWS TO 
SEVERELY RESTRICT OR BAN 
ABORTION.
ONE OF THOSE LAWS DO VERY WELL 
MAKE IT TO THE SUPREME COURT 
DURING YOUR PRESIDENCY IF YOU'RE
ELECTED PRESIDENT.
WHAT IS YOUR PLAN IF "ROE" IS 
STRUCK DOWN WHILE YOU'RE IN 
PRESIDENT. 
>> MY PLAN AS SOMEBODY WHO 
BELIEVES FOR A START THAT A 
WOMAN'S RIGHT TO CONTROL HER OWN
BODY IS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT 
THAT GOVERNMENT AND POLITICIANS 
SHOULD NOT INFRINGE ON THAT 

Spanish: 
RETALES HEMOS EL PODER DE LA 
DEMOCRACIA EN LAS MANOS DE LOS 
VOTANTES Y NO DE LAS 
CORPORACIONES. ESTAMOS HABLANDO 
DE CIERTO PROBLEMAS. IMAGINE LO 
QUE SUCEDE EN FLORIDA, QUE TIENE
TANTO PODER EN LA DEMOCRACIA.
 IMAGINEN QUE SUS VOCES SE E
ESCUCHEN MÁS QUE LAS DE NADIE.
>>>  NECESITO QUE LOS DEMÁS 
HABLEN. GRACIAS.
>>>  NADA MÁS ES POSIBLE, I
INDEPENDIENTE SI ES EDUCACIÓN O 
SALUD.
>>>  SENADOR SANDERS.
ROE VS WADE  ES LA LEY DESDE 
1919
1973,  AHORA QUE HAY UNA MAYORÍA
CONSERVADORA EN LA CORTE SU
SUPREMA, VARIOS ESTADOS P
PROHIBIERON EL ABORTO.
 ESO PODRÍA LLEGAR A LA CORTE 
SUPREMA DURANTE SU PRESIDENCIA.
¿ CUÁL ES SU PLAN PARA ENFRENTAR
ESTO?

Spanish: 
>>>  CREO QUE EL DERECHO DE LA 
MUJER ES UN DERECHO 
CONSTITUCIONAL Y QUE LOS 
GOBIERNOS NO DEBIESEN V
VULNERARLO.
 HAREMOS TODO LO POSIBLE PARA 
DEFENDER ROE VS WADE,.
 SEGUNDO,  JAMÁS ASIGNARE  A 
NINGÚN MAGISTRADO  A MENOS QUE
ESTÉ CLARO QUE DEFENDERÁ ROE VS 
WADE,.
 TENEMOS UNA TERRIBLE MAYORÍA DE
CINCO A CUATRO CONSERVADORA, 
PERO SÍ CREO QUE EN TÉRMINOS 
CONSTITUCIONALES TENEMOS EL 
PODER DE HACER NOTAR A LOS 
MAGISTRADOS,.
 ESO GENERARÁ UNA MAYORÍA, E
ESPERO, QUE ENTIENDA QUE UNA 
MUJER TIENE EL DERECHO A 

English: 
RIGHT.
WE WILL DO EVERYTHING WE CAN TO 
DEFEND "ROE V. WADE."
SECOND OF ALL, LET ME MAKE -- 
LET ME MAKE -- LET ME MAKE A 
PROMISE HERE.
YOU ASKED ABOUT LITMUS TEST.
MY LITMUS TEST IS I WILL NEVER 
APPOINT ANY NOMINATION -- 
NOMINATE ANY JUSTICE TO THE 
SUPREME COURT UNLESS I THOUGHT 
IT WAS 100% CLEAR THAT WE OR SHE
WOULD DEFEND "ROE V. WADE."
THIRD OF ALL, I DO NOT BELIEVE 
IN PACKING THE COURT.
WE GOT A TERRIBLE 5-4 MAJORITY, 
CONSERVATIVE COURT RIGHT NOW, 
BUT I DO BELIEVE THAT 
CONSTITUTIONALLY WE HAVE THE 
POWER TO ROTATE JUDGES TO OTHER 
COURT, AND THAT BRINGS THE NEW 
BLOOD INTO THE SUPREME COURT AND
A MAJORITY I HOPE THAT WILL 
UNDERSTAND THAT A WOMAN HAS THE 
RIGHT TO CONTROL HER OWN BODY 
AND THAT CORPORATIONS CANNOT RUN
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 
>> HOLD ON.
I'M GOING TO GIVE YOU TEN 
ADDITIONAL SECONDS. 

English: 
>> THE QUESTION IS WHAT IF THE 
COURT HAS ALREADY OVERTURNED ROE
AND IT'S GONE.
ALL OF THE THINGS YOU JUST 
DESCRIBED WOULD BE TRY TO 
PRESERVE IT.
IF ROE IS GONE WHAT WILL YOU DO 
AS PRESIDENT?
>> WELL, FIRST OF ALL, LET ME 
TELL YOU THIS.
IT DIDN'T COME UP.
MEDICARE FOR ALL GUARANTEES 
EVERY WOMAN IN THIS COUNTRY THE 
RIGHT TO HAVE AN ABORTION IF SHE
WANTS IT. 
>> THANK YOU, SENATOR. 
>> CAN I JUST ADDRESS THIS FOR A
SECOND, AND I WANT TO TALK 
DIRECTLY, DIRECTLY TO AMERICA'S 
WOMEN AND TO MEN WHO LOVE THEM.
WOMEN'S REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS ARE 
UNDER ASSAULT BY PRESIDENT TRUMP
AND THE REPUBLICAN PARTY.
30 STATES ARE TRYING TO OVERTURN
"ROE V. WADE" RIGHT NOW, AND IT 
IS MIND BOGGLING TO ME THAT WE 
ARE DEBATING THIS ON THIS STAGE 
IN 2019 AMONG DEMOCRATS WHETHER 
WOMEN SHOULD HAVE ACCESS TO 
REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS.
I THINK WE HAVE TO STOP PLAYING 
DEFENSE AND START PLAYING 
OFFENSE, BUT LET ME TELL YOU ONE
THING ABOUT POLITICS BECAUSE IT 
GOES TO THE CRUX OF THE 
DEAL-MAKE.

Spanish: 
CONTROLAR SU CUERPO Y LAS 
CORPORACIONES NO.
>>>  TIENE 10 A SEGUNDOS MÁS.
 LA PREGUNTA FUE QUÉ PASA SI YA 
HAN REVOCADO LA LEY.
¿ QUÉ HARÍA SI REVOCA LA LEY?
>>> MEDICARE PAREA A TODOS  
GARANTIZA A TODAS LAS MUJERES 
DEL PAÍS EL DERECHO A TENER EL 
ABORTO.
>>>  QUISIERA HABLAR DE ESTO.
 QUIERO HABLAR DIRECTAMENTE A 
LAS MUJERES DEL PAÍS Y A LOS 
HOMBRES QUE LA AMAN. EL DERECHO 
REPRODUCTIVO DE LA MUJER ESTÁ 
BAJO ATAQUE POR PARTE DEL 
PARTIDO REPUBLICANO Y EL 
PRESIDENTE TRUMP.
 HAY MUCHOS ESTADOS QUE ESTÁN 
TRATANDO DE REVOCAR ROE VS WAD.
 ME PARECE TERRIBLE QUE LO 
ESTEMOS DEBATIENDO ENTRE DE
DEMÓCRATAS EN ESTE MOMENTO.
 TENEMOS QUE DEJAR DE JUGAR A LA

Spanish: 
DEFENSIVA Y ATACAR.
 ESTO TIENE QUE VER CON LA 
CORRUPCIÓN.
 CUANDO ACABA LAS NEGOCIACIONES,
HAY DEBATE SOBRE LOS DERECHOS DE
LAS MUJERES Y HAY POSTURAS QUE 
HAN CEDIDO.
 POR OTRO LADO, TENEMOS LA AC,A 
YO TUVE QUE LUCHAR MUCHÍSIMO CON
OTRA MUJERES PARA ASEGURARME DE 
QUE NO SE VENDIERAN LOS SE
SERVICIOS DE ABORTO O ANT
ANTICONCEPTIVOS.
 IMAGINEMOS ESTOS,  PENSEMOS QUE
MITCH MCCONNELL QUIERE NEGOCIAR,
A QUIÉN QUIEREN NEGOCIANDO CO
ÉL?
 YO SOY LA PERSONA QUE MÁS HA 
DEFENDIDO A LAS MUJERES DURANTE 
MÁS DE UNA DÉCADA.

English: 
WHEN THE DOORS CLOSE AND THE 
NEGOTIATIONS ARE MADE, THERE ARE
CONVERSATIONS ABOUT WOMEN'S 
RIGHTS AND COMPROMISES HAVE BEEN
MADE ON OUR BOOKS, THAT'S HOW WE
GOT TO HYDE, THAT'S HOW THE HYDE
AMENDMENT WAS CREATED, A 
COMPROMISE BY LEADERS OF BOTH 
PARTIES.
THEN VERY WITH THE ACA.
DURING THE ACA NEGOTIATION, I 
HAD TO FIGHT LIKE HECK WITH 
OTHER WOMEN TO MAKE SURE THAT 
CONTRACEPTION WASN'T SOLD DOWN 
THE RIVER OR ABORTION SERVICES 
ARE AND SOY WHAT WE NEED TO KNOW
IS IMAGINE THIS ONE QUESTION, 
WHEN WE BEAT PRESIDENT TRUMP AND
MITCH McCONNELL WALKS INTO THE 
OVAL OFFICE, GOD FORBID TO DO 
NEGOTIATIONS, WHO DO YOU WANT 
WHEN THAT DOOR CLOSES SITTING 
BEHIND THAT DESK TO FIGHT FOR 
WOMEN'S RIGHTS?
I'VE BEEN THE FIERCEST ADVOCATE 
FOR OVER A DECADE. 
>> THANK YOU. 
>> AND I PROMISE WHEN THAT DOOR 
CLOSES I'LL GUARANTEE WOMEN'S 
REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS NO MATTER 
WHAT. 
>> THANK YOU, THANK YOU.
WE'RE MOVING TO CLIMATE, GUYS.
SENATOR HARRIS, I'M ADDRESS YOU 
FIRST.

English: 
YOU LIVE IN A STATE THAT'S BEEN 
HIT BY DROUGHT, WILDFIRES, 
FLOODING, CLIMATE CHANGE IS A 
MAJOR CONCERN FOR YOUR STATE, 
PRETTY OBVIOUS.
LAST NIGHT VOTERS HEARD MANY OF 
THE CANDIDATES WEIGH IN ON THEIR
PROPOSALS.
EXPLAIN SPECIFICALLY WHAT YOURS 
IS. 
>> WELL, FIRST OF ALL, I DON'T 
EVEN CALL IT CLIMATE CHANGE.
IT'S A CLIMATE CRISIS 
T.REPRESENTS AN EXISTENTIAL 
THREAT TO US AS A SPECIES, AND 
THE FACT THAT WE HAVE A 
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 
WHO HAS EMBRACED SCIENCE PHIL 
MICKELSON OVER FACT WILL BE TO 
OUR COLLECTIVE PERIL.
I VISITED WHILE THE EMBERS WERE 
SMOULDERING THE WILDFIRES IN 
CALIFORNIA.
I SPOKE WITH FIREFIGHTERS WHO 
WERE IN THE MIDST OF FIGHTING A 
FIRE WHILE THEIR OWN HOMES WERE 
BURNING, AND ON THIS ISSUE IT IS
A CRITICAL ISSUE THAT IS ABOUT 
WHAT WE MUST DO TO CONFRONT WHAT
IS IMMEDIATE AND BEFORE US RIGHT
NOW.
THAT'S WHY I SUPPORT A GREEN NEW
DEAL.
IT'S WHY I BELIEVE ON DAY ONE 
AND AS PRESIDENT WE'LL RE-ENTER 
US INTO THE PARIS AGREEMENT 
BECAUSE WE HAVE TO TAKE THESE 

Spanish: 
>>>  GRACIAS, SENADORA.
>>>  PASAMOS A MEDIO AMBIENTE.
>>>  SENADORA HARRIS, USTED Y UN
ESTADO QUE HA SIDO AFECTADO POR 
LA SEQUÍA, INUNDACIONES Y OTROS.
 ES UN TEMA MUY IMPORTANTE Y.
 MUCHOS DE LOS CANDIDATOS HA
HABLARON DE ESTAS PROPUESTAS.
>>>  PRIMERO QUE TODO, ES UNA 
CRISIS CLIMÁTICA.
 ES UNA AMENAZA EXISTENCIAL COMO
ESPECIE. EL HECHO QUE TENGAMOS 
UN PRESIDENTE QUE CREE MÁS EN LA
CIENCIA FICCIÓN ES ALGO 
TERRIBLE.
 VISITE LOS SECTORES DE LOS 
INCENDIOS FORESTALES EN 
CALIFORNIA

English: 
ISSUES SERIOUSLY, AND FRANKLY 
VERY A PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED 
STATES.
WE TALKED ABOUT -- YOU ASKED 
BEFORE WHAT IS THE GREATEST 
NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT TO THE 
UNITED STATES IT'S DONALD TRUMP,
AND I'M GOING TO TELL YOU, WHY 
AND I'M GOING TO TELL YOU, WHY 
BECAUSE I AGREE CLIMATE CHANGE 
REPRESENTS AN EXISTENTIAL 
THREAT.
HE DENIES THE SCIENCE.
YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT NORTH 
KOREA.
REAL THREAT IN TERMS OF NUCLEAR 
ARSENAL, BUT WHAT DOES HE DO?
HE EMBRACES KIM JONG-UN, A 
DICTATOR FOR THE SAKE OF A PHOTO
OP, PUTIN, YOU WANT TO TALK -- 
>> I WANT TO STICK TO CLIMATE. 
>> HE TAKES THE WORD OVER THE 
AMERICAN JENS COMMUNITY WHEN IT 
TOMS TO A TOO THREAT TO OUR 
DEMOCRACY AND OUR ELECTION.
THESE ARE THE ISSUES THAT ARE 
BEFORE US, CHUCK. 
>> I HEAR YOU.
THANK YOU, SENATOR HARRIS.
MAYOR BUTTIGIEG, IN YOUR CLIMATE
PLAN IF USUAL ELECTED PRESIDENT 
IN YOUR FIRST TERM HOW IS THIS 
GOING TO HELP FARMERS IMPACTED 
BY CLIMATE CHANGE IN THE 
MIDWEST?
>> WELL, THE REALITY IS WE NEED 

Spanish: 
 ME PARECE QUE ES FUNDAMENTAL.
 ESPERO QUE EN EL PRIMER DÍA 
PODAMOS ENTRAR AL 
PARÍS DE INMEDIATO. DEBEMOS 
TOMARNOS ESTO EN SERIO. JUNTARON
ANTES CUÁL ES LA AMENAZA MÁS 
GRANDE PARA EL PAÍS, ES DONALD 
TRUMP
 LES DIRÉ POR QUÉ.
 EL CAMBIO CLIMÁTICO GENERA UNA 
AMENAZA, ÉL NIEGA LA CIENCIA, 
HABLEMOS DE COREA DEL NORTE. 
TIENEN UN A ARMAMENTO O NUCLEARY
EL EL ACOGE A KIM JONG UN.
 ÉL LE CREE MÁS AL PRESIDENTE 
PUTIN QUE A LAS AGENCIAS DE I
INTELIGENCIA EL PAÍS.
 ESOS SON LOS TEMAS QUE E
ENFRENTAMOS.
>>>  ALCALDE BUTTIGIEG.
 SI USTED ES ELEGIDO PRESIDENTE,

English: 
TO BEGIN ADAPTING RIGHT AWAY BUT
WE ALSO CAN'T SKIP A BEAT ON 
PREVENTING CLIMATE CHANGE FROM 
GETTING EVEN WORSE.
THAT'S WHY WE NEED AGGRESSIVE 
AND AMBITIOUS MEASURES.
THAT'S WHY WE NEED TO DO A 
CARBON TAX AND DIVIDEND, BUT I 
WOULD PROPOSE WE DO IT IN A WAY 
THAT'S REBATED OUT TO THE 
AMERICAN PEOPLE IN A PROGRESSIVE
FASHION SO THAT MOST AMERICANS 
ARE MADE MORE THAN WHOLE.
THIS ISN'T THEORETICAL FOR US IN
SOUTH BEND EITHER.
PARTS OF CALIFORNIA ON FIRE.
RIGHT HERE IN FLORIDA THEY ARE 
TALKING ABOUT SHE LEVEL RISE.
I HAD TO ENACT THE EMERGENCY 
MEASURES IN OUR CITY, THE FIRST 
WAS A THOUSAND YEAR FLOOD AND 
THE NEXT WAS A 500-YEAR FLOOD.
THIS IS NOT JUST HAPPENING ON 
THE ARCTIC ICE CAPS.
THIS IS HAPPENING IN THE MIDDLE 
OF THE COUNTRY AND WE'VE GOT TO 
BE DRAMATICALLY MORE AGGRESSIVE 
MOVING FORWARD.
HERE'S WHAT VERY FEW PEOPLE TALK
ABOUT.
FIRST OF ALL, RURAL AMERICA CAN 
BE PART OF THE SOLUTION INSTEAD 
OF BEING TOLD THEY ARE PART OF 
THE PROBLEM.
WITH THE RIGHT KIND OF SOIL 
MANAGEMENT RURAL MANAGEMENT 
COULD BE A HUGE PART OF HOW WE 
GET THIS DONE AND SECONDLY WE'VE
GOT TO LOOK TO THE LEADERSHIP OF
LOCAL COMMUNITIES.

Spanish: 
¿ CÓMO AYUDARÁ A LOS GRANJEROS?
>>>  DEBEMOS COMENZAR A AD
ADAPTARNOS.
  TENEMOS QUE EVITAR TAMBIÉN QUE
EL CAMBIO CLIMÁTICO EMPEORE. 
DEBEMOS GENERAR ESTO.
 LO POP POR U DE LA MANERA QUE  
PRESENTADA DE MANERA PROGRESIVA 
PARA QUE LA GENTE LO ENTIENDA. 
ESO NO ES TEÓRICO PARA NOSOTROS.
 EN INDIANA TUVE QUE ACTIVAR EL 
CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIONES DOS 
VECES. PRIMERO FUE POR UNA GRAN 
INUNDACIÓN.
 ESTO NO SUCEDE EN EL ÁRTICO, 
SINO EN EL CENTRO DEL PAÍS. 
DEBEMOS SER MUCHO MÁS AGRESIVOS.
 ESTADOS UNIDOS RURAL PUEDE SER 
PARTE DE LA SOLUCIÓN Y NO EL 

English: 
THE NETWORKS AND MAYORS AND 
CITIES AROUND THE WORLD THAT 
COME TOGETHER.
WE NEED TO HAVE A SUMMIT WHERE 
WE BRING THEM TOGETHER. 
>> THANK YOU, MAYOR BUTTIGIEG. 
>> I WANT TO BRING GOVERNOR 
HICKENLOOPER IN.
YOU'VE SAID THAT OIL AND GAS 
COMPANIES SHOULD BE A PART OF 
THE SOLUTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE.
LOTS OF YOUR COLLEAGUES ON STAGE
HAVE TALKED ABOUT MOVING AWAY 
FROM FOSSIL FUELS ENTIRELY.
CAN OIL AND GAS COMPANIES BE 
REAL PARTNERS IN THIS FIGHT?
>> WELL, I SHARE THE SENSE OF 
URGENCY.
I'M A SCIENTIST SO I -- I 
RECOGNIZE THAT IN SO OR 12 YEARS
OF ACTUALLY, YOU KNOW, SUFFERING
IRREVERSIBLE DAMAGE, BUT, YOU 
KNOW, GUARANTEEING EVERYBODY A 
GOVERNMENT JOB IS NOT GOING TO 
GET US THERE.
SOCIALISM IN THAT SENSE IS NOT 
THE SOLUTION.
WE HAVE TO LOOK AT WHAT REALLY 
WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE.
IN COLORADO WE'VE CLOSED A 
COUPLE OF COOL PLANTS AND 
REPLACED THEM WITH SOLAR AND 
WIND AND BATTERY AND MONTHLY 
BILLS HAVE GONE DOWN.
WE'RE BUILDING A NETWORK FOR 

Spanish: 
PROBLEMA.
 CON EL MANEJO APROPIADO DE LA 
TIERRA, PUEDEN AYUDAR A DETENER 
ESTO. SEGUNDO, DEBEMOS ANALIZAR 
A LOS LÍDERES DE LAS 
COMUNIDADES.
>>>  ALCALDE.
 SE ACABÓ SU TIEMPO.
>>>  DEBEMOS GENERAR UNA JUNTA.
>>>  GRACIAS, ALCALDE BUTTIGIEG.
>>>  GOBERNADOR HICKENLOOPER,  
USTED HA DICHO QUE DEBE SER 
PARTE DE LA SOLUCIÓN. 
MUCHOS DE SUS COLEGAS HAN 
HABLADO DE ALEJARSE DE LOS C
COMBUSTIBLES FÓSILES.
¿ LAS COMPAÑÍAS DE COMBUSTIBLE Y
GAS PUEDEN SER ASOCIADOS EN ESTA
LUCHA?
>>>  SOY CIENTÍFICO, RECONOZCO 
QUE EN 10 O 12 AÑOS DE SUFRIR 
DAÑOS IRREVERSIBLES, PERO 
GARANTIZAR UN TRABAJO O NO NOS 
LLEVARÁ AHÍ. EL SOCIALISMO NO ES

English: 
ELECTRIC VEHICLES.
WE'RE WORKING WITH THE OIL AND 
GAS INDUSTRY, AND WE'VE CREATED 
THE FIRST METHANE REGULATIONS IN
THE COUNTRY.
METHANE IS 25 TIMES WORSE THAN 
CO2 AND THEN WE'VE GOT TO GET TO
THE LAST PART, THE HEAVY 
INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIES, WE 
HAVEN'T SEEN THE PLANS YET.
IF YOU LOOK AT THE REAL 
PROBLEMS, CO2, THE WORST 
POLLUTERS OF CO2 IS CHINA, THE 
UNITED STATES AND CONCRETE AND 
EXHALATION AND BEYOND THAT ONLY 
BY BRINGING PEOPLE TOGETHER, 
BUSES AND NON-PROFITS, WE CAN'T 
DEMONIZE EVERY BUSINESS.
WE WE'VE GO TO BRING THEM 
TOGETHER BECAUSE ULTIMATELY IFFY
WITH EAR NOT ABLE TO DO THAT 
WE'LL DOOMED FAILURE.
WE HAVE NO WAY OF DOING THIS 
WITHOUT BRING EVERYONE TOGETHER.
>> VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN, ON THE 
ISSUE OF HOW YOU DO THIS, 
DEMOCRATS ARE ARGUING ROBUSTLY 
AMONG THEMSELVES ABOUT WHAT'S 
THE BEST WAY TO TACKLE CLIMATE 
CHANGE, BUT IF WE'RE HONEST MANY
REAP WARNINGS INCLUDING THE 
PRESIDENT, ARE STILL NOT SURE IF
THEY BELIEVE IT'S EVEN A SERIOUS
APPROXIMATE SO ARE THERE 

Spanish: 
LA SOLUCIÓN.
 DEBEMOS ANALIZAR LA VERDADERA 
DIFERENCIA.
 ESTAMOS GENERANDO UNA RED DE 
VEHÍCULOS ELÉCTRICOS. ESTAMOS 
TRABAJANDO CON LA INDUSTRIA DE 
GAS Y COMBUSTIBLE Y GENERAMOS 
LAS PRIMERAS REGULACIONES DE 
METANO.
 NO HEMOS VISTO ESTOS PLANES 
AÚN. LOS PEORES CONTAMINANTES 
SON CHINA, ESTADOS UNIDOS Y MÁS 
ALLÁ DE ESO DEBEMOS RECONOCER 
QUE SOLO UNIENDO A LAS PERSONAS 
PODEMOS TRABAJAR, NO PODEMOS 
DEMONIZAR A LAS PERSONA.
  GOBERNADOR
>>>  SI NO HACEMOS, FRACASE H
HAREMOS.
>>>  VICEPRESIDENTE, LOS 
DEMÓCRATAS DEBATEN MUCHO ENTRE 
ELLOS SOBRE LA MEJOR MANERA DE 
ENFRENTAR EL CAMBIO CLIMÁTICO, 
PERO INCLUSIVE EL PRESIDENTE NO 

English: 
SIGNIFICANT WAYS YOU CAN CUT 
CARBON EMISSIONS IF YOU HAVE TO 
DO IT WITH NO SUPPORT FROM 
CONGRESS?
>> THE ANSWER IS YES.
NUMBER ONE, WHEN OUR 
ADMINISTRATION, WE BUILT THE 
LARGEST WIND FARM IN THE WORLD, 
THE LARGEST SOLAR ENERGY 
FACILITY IN THE WORLD.
WE DROVE DOWN THE PRICE, 
COMPETITIVE PRICE OF BOAST THOSE
RENEWABLE SOURCES.
I WOULD IMMEDIATELY INSIST THAT 
WE IN FACT BUILD 500,000 
RECHARGING STATIONS THROUGHOUT 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WORKING
WITH GOVERNORS, MAYORS AND 
OTHERS SO THAT WE CAN GO TO A 
FULL ELECTRIC VEHICLE FUTURE BY 
THE YEAR 2030.
WOULD I MAKE SURE THAT WE 
INVESTED $400 MILLION IN NEW 
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY TO BE THE
EXPORTER NOT ONLY OF THE GREEN 
ECONOMY BUT AN ECONOMY THAT CAN 
CREATE MILLIONS OF JOBS, BUT I 
WOULD IMMEDIATELY JOIN THE PARIS
CLIMATE ACCORD.
I WOULD UP THE ANTE IN THAT 
ACCORD WHICH IT CALLS FOR 
BECAUSE WE MAKE UP 15% OF THE 
PROBLEM.

Spanish: 
ESTÁ SEGURO DE SI ES UN PROBLEMA
REAL.
¿ EXISTE UNA MANERA DE HACER 
ESTO SIN EL APOYO DEL CONGRESO?
>>>  SÍ.
 NOSOTROS GENERAMOS LAS MAYORES 
GRANJAS TEÓRICAS DEL PAÍS.
 BAJAMOS EL PRECIO COMPETITIVO 
DE LAS ENERGÍA REMO RENOVABLES.
 YO CONSTRUIRÍA DE INMEDIATO MÁS
ESTACIONES RECARGABLES  PARA 
PASAR A UN FUTURO COMPLETAMENTE 
ELÉCTRICO EN EL AÑO 2030.
 INVERTIRÍA $400,000,000 PARA 
CONVERTIRNOS EN EXPORTADORES NO 
SOLO DE UNA ECONOMÍA VERDE SINO 
DE UNA ECONOMÍA QUE GENERE 

Spanish: 
TRABAJO..
 TAMBIÉN INGRESARÍA LOS ACORDES 
CLIMÁTICOS.
 UN 85% DEL MUNDO ES EL RESTO.
 DEBEMOS SER LAS PERSONAS QUE 
UNEN AL MUNDO.
>>> SENADOR BERNIE.
 L
 CIENTÍFICOS DICEN QUE QUEDAN 10
AÑOS PARA UN DAÑO CRÍTICO. EL 
PRESIDENTE NO DEBE NEGAR LA 
REALIDAD, SINO DECIRLE AL RESTO 
DEL MUNDO QUE EN VEZ DE GASTAR 
MUCHÍSIMO DINERO EN ARMAMENTO DE
DESTRUCCIÓN, DEBEMOS ENFRENTAR
L 
EL DESAFÍO DE TRANSFORMAR LA 
TECNOLOGÍA. EL FUTURO DEL 
PLANETA DEPENDE DE ESTO.
>>>  ANTES DE PASAR A OTRO T

English: 
85% OF THE WORLD MAKES UP THE 
REST, AND SO WE HAVE TO HAVE 
SOMEONE WHO KNOWS HOW TO CORRAL 
THE REST WORLD, BRING THEM 
TOGETHER AND GET SOMETHING DONE 
IN OUR ADMINISTRATION. 
>> I WANT TO GIVE YOU 30 SECONDS
TO FOLLOW UP AND I'M GOING TO 
HOLD TO YOU 30. 
>> THE OLD WAYS ARE NO LONGER 
RELEVANT.
THE SCIENTISTS TELL US WE HAVE 
12 YEARS BEFORE THERE'S 
IRREPARABLE DAMAGE TO THIS 
PLANET.
THIS IS A GLOBAL ISSUE.
WHAT THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
STATES SHOULD DO IS NOT DENY THE
REALITY OF CLIMATE CHANGE BUT 
TELL THE REST OF THE WORLD THAT 
INSTEAD OF SPENDING A TRILLION 
AND A HALF DOLLARS ON WE OFFENSE
DESTRUCTION LET US GET TOGETHER 
FOR THE COMMON ENERGY AND THAT'S
TO TRANSFORM THE WORLD'S ENERGY 
SYSTEM AWAY FROM FOSSIL FUEL TO 
ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND 
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY. 
>> THANK YOU. 
>> THE FUTURE OF THE PLANET 
RESTS ON US DOING THAT. 
>> BEFORE WE GO.
HANG ON. 
>> BEFORE WE LEAVE THIS TOPIC. 
>> LISTEN, PASS THE TORCH.
PASS THE TORCH TO THE GENERATION
THAT GOING TO FEEL THE EFFECTS 
OF CLIMATE CHANGE.

Spanish: 
TEMA--
>>>  DEBEN PASAR LA ANTORCHA DE 
LIDERAZGO.
>>>  UN MOMENTO
 POR FAVOR, UN MOMENTO.
>>>  SE JOVEN NO SIGNIFICA QUE 
TUS IDEAS SON VIEJAS.
>>
 JOHN KENNEDY NO DIJO  EN UN 
PLAN PARA LLEVAR A UN HOMBRE A  
LA LUNA.
 JOHN KENNEDY DIJO AL FINAL DE 
LA DÉCADA PONDREMOS A UN HOMBRE 
EN LA LUNA, PORQUE EN ESE TIEMPO
O LA POLÍTICA QUE INCLUÍA LA 
GENTE Y LA IMAGINACIÓN,,
 SUEÑOS Y PLANES.
 MI CARRERA NO HA SIDO CON 
PLANES POLÍTICOS, SINO 
CULTIVANDO LA INSPIRACIÓN Y 
MOTIVACIÓN DE LA GENTE.
>>>  GRACIAS.
>>>  CUANDO DECIMOS QUE VAMOS A 
PASAR DE UNA ECONOMÍA SUCIA A 

English: 
>> BEFORE WE LEAVE THIS TOPIC, 
HERE'S SOMETHING THAT YOU'LL 
WANT TO WEIGH IN ON.
HOLD ONE MOMENT. 
>> JUST BECAUSE YOU'RE IN A 
YOUNGER BODY DOESN'T MEAN YOU 
HAVE OLD IDEAS. 
>> JOHN KENNEDY -- JOHN KENNEDY 
DID NOT SAY I HAVE A PLAN TO GET
A MAN TO THE MOON AND SO WE'RE 
GOING TO DO IT AND I THINK WE 
CAN ALL WORK TOGETHER AND MAYBE 
WE'LL GET A MAN ON THE MOON.
JOHN KENNEDY SAID BY THE END OF 
THIS DECADE WE ARE GOING TO PUT 
A MAN ON THE MOON BECAUSE JOHN 
KENNEDY WAS BACK IN THE DAY WHEN
POLITICS INCLUDED THE PEOPLE AND
INCLUDED IMAGINATION AND 
INCLUDED GREAT DREAMS AND 
INCLUDED GREAT PLANS AND I HAVE 
HAD A CAREER NOT MAKE MAKING THE
POLITICAL PLAN BUT I'VE HAD A 
CAREER HARNESSING THE 
INSPIRATION AND MOTIVATION AND 
EXCITEMENT OF PEOPLE.
MASSES OF PEOPLE.
WHEN WE KNOW THAT WE SAY WE'RE 
GOING TO TURN FROM A DIRTY 
ECONOMY TO A CLEAN ECONOMY WE'RE
GOING TO HAVE A GREEN NEW DEAL, 
WE'RE GOING TO CREATE MILLIONS 
OF JOBS, WE'RE GOING TO DO THIS 
WITHIN THE NEXT 12 YEARS BECAUSE
I'M NOT INTERESTED IN JUST 

English: 
WINNING THE NEXT ELECTION.
WE ARE INTERESTED IN OUR 
GRANDCHILDREN. 
>> WE'RE GOING SNEAK IN A BREAK 
IN A MINUTE BUT BEFORE WE GO I'M
GOING TO GO DOWN THE LINE HERE 
AND I'M ASKING YOU TO PLEASE FOR
ONE OR TWO WORDS ONLY, ALL 
RIGHT, PLEASE.
THE. 
>> REALLY. 
>> PRESIDENT OBAMA IN HIS FIRST 
YEAR WANTED TO ADDRESS BOTH 
HEALTHCARE AND CLIMATE AND ONLY 
GET ONE SIGNATURE ISSUE 
ACCOMPLISHED HEALTHCARE.
HE DIDN'T GET TO DO CLIMATE 
CHANGE.
YOU MAY GET ONE SHOT AND THE 
FIRST ISSUE YOU'RE GOING TO 
PUSH.
YOU GET ONE SHOT THAT IT MAY BE 
THE ONLY THING YOU GET PASSED.
WHAT IS THAT FIRST ISSUE FOR 
YOUR PRESIDENCY, ERIC SWALWELL, 
YOU'RE FIRST?
>> FOR PARKLAND AND EVERY 
COMMUNITY AFFECTED BY GUN 
VIOLENCE, ENDING GUN VIOLENCE. 
>> SENATOR BEN. 
>> CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE LACK 
OF ECONOMIC MOBILITY BERNIE 
TALKS ABOUT. 
>> SENATOR GILLIBRAND. 
>> PASSING A FAMILY BILL OF 

Spanish: 
UNA LIMPIA,  VAMOS A GENERAR 
MILLONES DE TRABAJOS, LO HAREMOS
DURANTE LOS PRÓXIMOS 12 AÑOS,  
PORQUE NO ME INTERESA GANAR 
ESTAS ELECCIONES, SINO NUESTROS 
NIETOS.
>>>  ANTES DE LA PAUSA,  LES 
PEDIRÉ QUE SEAN BREVES.
  POR FAVOR!
>>>  EL PRESIDENTE OBAMA QUERÍA 
HABLAR DE CAMBIO CLIMÁTICO Y 
SALUD Y SOLO LO LOGRÓ CON UN 
TEMA, SALUD. NO LOGRÓ TRABAJAR
EN CAMBIO CLIMÁTICO.
 ES PROBABLE QUE EN SU PRIMER 
MANDATO TODO LO LOGREN ENFRENTAR
UNO DE ESTOS TEMAS.
¿ CUÁL ES EL TEMA MÁS IMPORTANTE
DE SU GOBIERNO?
>>>  POR TODAS LAS COMUNIDADES 
AFECTADAS POR LA VIOLENCIA 
ARMADA, TERMINAR CON LA 

English: 
RIGHTS THAT INCLUDES A NATIONAL 
PAID LEAVE PLAN, UNIVERSAL 
PRE-K, AFFORDABLE DAY CARE AND 
MAKING SURE THAT WOMEN AND 
FAMILIES CAN THRIVE IN THE 
WORKPLACE NO MATTER WHO THEY 
ARE. 
>> OH, I LIKE THAT. 
>> SENATOR HARRIS, PASSING A 
MIDDLE CLASS AND WORKING FAMILY 
TAX CUT, DACA, GUNS. 
>> I'LL GIVE YOU CREDIT FOR THE 
FIRST THING YOU SAID. 
>> SENATOR SANDERS, ONLY ONE OR 
TWO ISSUES OUT THERE. 
>> I'M NOT SAYING THERE'S ONE OR
TWO. 
>> SENATOR SANDERS. 
>> YOU NEED A POLITICAL 
REVOLUTION.
PEOPLE HAVE GOT TO STAND UP AND 
TAKE ON THE SPECIAL INTERESTS.
WE CAN TRANSFORM THIS COUNTRY. 
>> VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN, YOUR 
FIRST ISSUE, MR. VICE PRESIDENT.
>> I THINK YOU'RE SO 
UNDERESTIMATING WHAT BARACK 
OBAMA DID.
HE'S THE FIRST MAN TO BRING 
TOGETHER THE ENTIRE WORLD, 196 
NATIONS TO COMMIT TO DEAL WITH 
CLIMATE CHANGE.
I DON'T BUY THAT.
[ APPLAUSE ]

Spanish: 
VIOLENCIA ARMADA.
>>>  EL CAMBIO CLIMÁTICO.
>>>  APROBAR UNA LEY Y FAMILIAR.
 ASEGURARNOS DE QUE LAS MUJERES 
PUEDAN HACERLO MEJOR.
>>>  SENADORA HARRIS.
>>>  IMPUESTO PARA LAS FAMILIAS 
DE CLASE MEDIA, DACA.
>>> :
>>>  SENADOR SANDERS.
>>>  DEBEMOS TENER UNA 
REVOLUCIÓN POLÍTICA.
 DEBEMOS TRANSFORMAR ESTE PAÍS.
>>>  VICEPRESIDENTE BIDEN.
>>>  BARACK OBAMA FUE EL PRIMER 
HOMBRE QUE UNIÓ A TODO EL MUNDO 
EN CONTRA DEL CAMBIO CLIMÁTICO.

Spanish: 
(APLAUSOS). 
(APLAUSOS). 
>>>  LO PRIMERO QUE HARÍA SERÍA 
ASEGURARME DE DERROTAR A DONALD 
TRUMP.
>>>  ALCALDE BUTTIGIEG.
¿ CUÁL ES SU PRIORIDAD?
>>>  ARREGLAR NUESTRA DEMOCRACIA
ANTES DE QUE SEA TARDE.
>>> SEÑOR YANG
>>>  DIVIDENDO DE $1000 PARA 
TODOS Y ESO NOS HARÍA MEJORAR EN
TÉRMINOS DE EL ENFRENTAMIENTO 
CON EL CAMBIO CLIMÁTICO.
>>>  GOBERNADOR HICKENLOOPER.
>>>  UN ACUERDO COLABORATIVA EN 
CONTRA DEL CAMBIO CLIMÁTICO Y TE
AMÉ CONCUERDO EN QUE NO DEBEMOS 
VOLVER A ELEGIR AL CREADOR 
PRIPR 
PRESIDENTE.
>>>  HACER QUE SEA EL MEJOR 
LUGAR DEL MUNDO PARA QUE CREZCA 
UN NIÑO. ESTADOS UNIDOS ERA EL 

English: 
>> THE FIRST THING I WOULD DO IS
MAKE SURE THAT WE DEFEAT DONALD 
TRUMP. 
>> OKAY. 
>> PERIOD.
>> MAYOR BUTTIGIEG, YOUR FIRST 
PRIORITY, YOUR FIRST ISSUE AS 
PRESIDENT THAT YOU ARE GOING TO 
BLOCK AND TACKLE. 
>> FIX OUR DEMOCRACY BEFORE IT'S
TOO LATE.
GET THAT RIGHT, CLIMATE, 
IMMIGRATION, TAXES AND EVERY 
OTHER ISSUE GETS BETTER.
>> YANG. 
>> I WOULD PASS A $1,000 FREEDOM
DIFFIDENT FOR EVERY AMERICAN 
ADULT WHICH WOULD SPEED US UP ON
CLIMATE CHANGE BECAUSE IF YOU 
GET THE BOOT OFF PEOPLE'S 
THROATS THEY WILL FOCUS ON 
CLIMATE CHANGE. 
>> GOVERNOR HICKENLOOPER. 
>> I WOULD DO A COLLABORATIVE 
APPROACH TO CLIMATE CHANGE AND I
WOULD PRONOUNCE IT WELL BEFORE 
THE ETHEROUX MAKE SURE WE DON'T 
RE-ELECT THE WORST PRESIDENT IN 
AMERICAN HISTORY. 
>> AND MISS WILLIAMSON. 
>> MY FIRST CALL IS TO THE PRIME
MINISTER OF NEW ZEALAND TO MAKE 
THE PLACE THAT NEW ZEALAND IS 
THE BEST PLACE IN THE WORLD FOR 
A CHILD TO GROIN AND I WILL SAY 
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS 
GOING TO BE THE BEST PLACE IN 
THE WORLD FOR A CHILD TO GROW 
UP.
WE ARE GOING -- 
>> THANK YOU.

Spanish: 
MEJOR LUGAR DEL MUNDO PARA QUE 
UN NIÑO CREZCA.
>>>  AL MENOS FUE UN POCO MÁS 
CORTA SU RESPUESTA.
>>>  VAMOS A UNA BREVE PAUSA.
 YA VOLVEMOS.
(APLAUSOS). 
(APLAUSOS). 

English: 
YOU GRICE CLOSE -- AT LEAST IT 
WAS SHORTER RESPONSES. 
>> NOT AT ALL.
>> B-MINUS. 
>> WE'RE GOING TO TAKE A QUICK 
BREAK AND BE RIGHT BACK WITH 
THESE CANDIDATES RIGHT AFTER 
THIS.
 

Spanish: 
(MÚSICA).
(MÚSICA).
(MÚSICA).
(MÚSICA).
(MÚSICA).
(MÚSICA).
(MÚSICA).
<
>>> BIENVENIDOS DE VUELTA AL 
DEBATE DEMÓCRATA.
 VAMOS A SEGUIR CON LA PREGUNTA 
DE LESTER Y LA AUDIENCIA.
>>> ¿ SÍ?
>>>  EN BREVE LO HAREMOS.
 VAMOS A NEGRO.
>>>  VAMOS A HABLAR DE ARMAS.
>>>  USTED TIENE UNA POSTURA 
ÚNICA. PROPONE QUE EL GOBIERNO 

English: 
CANDIDATES RIGHT AFTER THIS.
>>> WELCOME BACK TO THE 
DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES DEBATE IN 
MIAMI.
WELL EAR GOING TO CONTINUE THE 
QUESTIONING NOW WITH THE 
AUDIENCE.
WE ARE?
WE ARE IN A SECOND GOING TO HAVE
A QUESTION FROM THE AUDIENCE BUT
THAT WAS JUST A FAKE-OUT. 
>> GO AHEAD. 
>> WE'RE GOING TO GO TO THE 
ISSUE OF GUNS. 
>> CONGRESSMAN SWALWELL, YOU 
HAVE YOU A UNIQUE POSITION ON 
GUN REFORM.
YOU'RE PROPOSE THE GUN SHOULD 
BUY BACK EVERY ASSAULT WEAPON IN
AMERICA AND IT SHOULD BE MANNED 
TRIP.
HOW DO YOU ENVISION THAT WORKING

Spanish: 
DEBIESE COMPRAR TODAS LAS ARMAS 
DE ASALTO Y DEBIESE SER 
OBLIGATORIO.
¿ CÓMO CREE QUE ESO FUNCIONARÁ 
EN ALGUNOS ESTADOS?
>>>  MANTENGA SUS PISTOLAS, 
RIFLES Y ESCOPETAS, PERO PODEMOS
QUITARLES LAS ARMAS PELIGROSAS.
 SOY EL ÚNICO CANDIDATO EN ESTE 
LUGAR QUE PIDE UNA PROHIBICIÓN Y
COMPRA DE TODAS LAS ARMAS DE 
ASALTO.
 HE VISTO LOS PLANES DE LOS 
OTROS CANDIDATOS,.
 NO VAN A HACER NADA PARA SALVAR
A LA GENTE, POR EJEMPLO DE 
PARKLAND..
 ESTO LO PROPONGO TAMBIÉN COMO 
PADRE.
 PADRE UNA GENERACIÓN EN DONDE 
ENVIAMOS A NUESTROS HIJOS A 

English: 
ESPECIALLY IN STATES WHERE GUN 
RIGHTS ARE A STRONG PLATFORM?
>> KEEP YOUR PISTOLS, YOUR 
RIFLES, YOUR SHOTGUNS BUT WE CAN
TAKE THE MOST DANGEROUS WEAPONS 
FROM THE MOST DANGEROUS PEOPLE.
WE HAVE THE NRA ON THE ROPES 
BECAUSE OF THE MOMS, BECAUSE OF 
THE BRADY GROUP, BECAUSE OF 
DIFFERENT -- BECAUSE OF MARCH 
FOR OUR LIFE, BUT I'M ONLY 
CANDIDATE ON THIS STAGE CALLING 
FOR A BAN AND BUYBACK OF EVERY 
SINGLE ASSAULT WEAPON IN MERGE 
I'VE SEEN THE PLANS OF THE OTHER
CANDIDATES HERE.
THEY WOULD ALL LEAVE 15 MILLION 
ASSAULT WEAPONS IN OUR COMMUNITY
AND WOULDN'T DO A SINGLE THING 
TO SAVE A SINGLE LIFE IN 
PARKLAND.
I'LL APPROACH THIS ISSUE AS A 
PROSECUTOR.
I'LL APPROACH IT AS THE ONLY 
PERSON ON THE STAGE WHO HAS 
VOTED AND PASSED BACKGROUND 
CHECKS BUT ALSO AS A PARENT OF A
GENERATION WHO SENDS OUR 
CHILDREN TO SCHOOL AND WE LOOK 
AT WHAT THEY ARE WEARING, SO WE 
CAN REMEMBER IT IN CASE WE HAVE 
TO IDENTIFY THEM LATER.
A GENERATION WHO HAS SEEN 
THOUSAND OF BLACK CHILDREN 
KILLED IN OUR STREETS AND A 

Spanish: 
CLASES Y NO FIJAMOS EN QUE 
VISTEN PARA PODER IDENTIFICARLOS
EN CASO DE QUE PASE ALGO. HEMOS 
VISTO A MILES DE NIÑOS 
AFROAMERICANOS MORIR.
 NO TENEMOS QUE VIVIR ASÍ, 
DEBEMOS SER UN PAÍS QUE ACOJA A 
NUESTROS HIJOS Y L LOS AME MÁS 
QUE A NUESTRAS ARMAS.
>>>  SENADOR SANDERS, SE LIBERÓ 
UNA ENTREVISTA QUE USTED Y 
DORMIDOS 2013 Y DIJO QUE SU 
VISIÓN ERA QUE TODO DEBÍA SER 
IGUAL.
>>>  NO.
>>> ¿ CAMBIO DE PENSAR?
>> ES UNA 
CITA.
>>>  TENEMOS UNA CRISIS DE A
ARMAS. 4000 PERSONAS AL D AÑO
MUEREN.
 EN 1988 PERDÍ POR QUÉ PROPUSE 

English: 
GENERATION WHO GOES TO THE 
THEATER AND WE ACTUALLY LOOK 
WHERE THE FIRE EXITS ARE.
WE DON'T HAVE TO LIVE THIS WAY.
WE MUST BE A COUNTRY WHO LOVES 
OUR CHILDREN MORE THAN WE LOVE 
OUR GUNS. 
>> SENATOR SANDERS, A VERMONT 
NEWSPAPER RECENTLY RELEASED 
PORTIONS OF AN INTERVIEW YOU 
GAVE IN 2013 IN WHICH YOU SAID, 
QUOTE, MY OWN VIEW ON GUNS IS 
EVERYTHING BEING EQUAL STATES 
SHOULD MAKE THOSE DECISIONS.
HAS YOUR THINKING CHANGED SINCE 
THEN, DO YOU THINK THERE'S A 
FEDERAL ROLE TO PLAY. 
>> THAT'S A MISCHARACTERIZATION.
>> THAT'S A QUOTE OF YOURS. 
>> WE HAVE A GUN CRISIS RIGHT 
NOW, 40,000 PEOPLE A YEAR ARE 
GETTING KILLED.
IN 1988, RACHEL, WHEN IT WASN'T 
POPULAR, I RAN ON A PLATFORM OF 
BANNING ASSAULT WEAPONS.
I HAVE A D-MINUS INVESTIGATE 
RECORD FROM THE NRA, AND I 
BELIEVE THAT WHAT WE NEED IS 

Spanish: 
ESTA LEY.
 YO CREÍA QUE LO QUE NECE
NECESITÁBAMOS ERA LEGISLACIÓN 
COMPLETA AL RESPECTO QUE GAR
GARANTICE REVISIÓN GARANTI DE 
ANTECEDENTES.
 LO CREÍA EN LOS OCHENTAS Y LO 
CREO AHORA.
 LAS ARMAS DE ASALTO SON ARMAS 
SIMPLEMENTE PARAMILITARES.
>>>  CON SU PLAN LAS DEJA 
ENLENL EN 
LAS CALLES.
>>>  SI EL GOBIERNO LO QUIERE 
HACER, LO PUEDEN HACER.
>>>  SENADORA HARRIS.
>>>  ME PARECE QUE SU IDEA ES 
INCREÍBLE.
 EL PROBLEMA ES QUE EL CONGRESO 
NO HA TENIDO EL CORAJE PARA 
ACTUAR.
 CUANDO SEA ELEGIDA COMO P

English: 
COMPREHENSIVE GUN LEGISLATION 
THAT AMONG OTHER THINGS PROVIDE 
UNIVERSAL BACKGROUNDS, WE END 
THE GUN SHOW LOOPHOLES AND END 
THE STRAW MAN POSITION AND I 
BELIEVE IN 1988 AND TODAY.
ASSAULT WEAPONS -- 
>> YOU LEAVE 15 MILLION WEAPONS.
>> AND THEY SHOULD NOT BE ON THE
STREETS OF AMERICA. 
>> YOU WOULD -- YOUR PLAN LEAVES
THEM ON THE STREET.
LEAVES 15 MILLION ON THE STREET.
>> WE BAN THE SALE. 
>> WOULD YOU BUY THEM BACK?
>> THAT'S WHAT I BELIEVE FOR 
MANY YEARS. 
>> WOULD YOU BUY THEM BACK?
>> IF THE GOVERNMENT WANTS TO DO
THAT, IF PEOPLE WANT TO DO THAT.
>> SENATOR HARRIS. 
>> I THINK YOUR IDEA IS A GREAT 
ONE, CONGRESSMAN SWALWELL, AND I
WOULD SAY THERE'S A LOT OF GREAT
IDEAS.
THE PROBLEM IS CONGRESS HAS NOT 
HAD THE COURAGE OF ACT WHICH IS 
WHY WHEN I'M ELECTED PRESIDENT 
OF THE UNITED STATES I'LL GIVE 
THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS 100 
DAYS TO PULL THEIR ACT TOGETHER,
BRING ALL THESE GOOD IDEAS 
TOGETHER AND PUT A BILL ON MY 
DESK FOR SIGNATURE AND IF THEY 

English: 
DO NOT I WILL TAKE EXECUTIVE 
ACTION AND I WILL PUT IN PLACE 
THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE 
BACKGROUND CHECK POLICY WE'VE 
H.I WILL REQUIRE THE ATF TO TAKE
THE LICENSES OF GUN DEALERS WHO 
VIOLATE THE LAW AND I WILL BAN 
BY EXECUTIVE ORDER THE 
IMPORTATION OF ASSAULT WEAPONS 
BECAUSE I'M GOING TO TELL YOU AS
A PROSECUTOR I HAVE SEEN MORE 
AUTOPSY PHOTOGRAPHS THAN I CARE 
TO TELL YOU, I HAVE HUGGED MORE 
MOTHERS WHO ARE THE MOTHERS OF 
HOMICIDE VICTIMS AND I HAVE 
ATTENDED MORE POLICE OFFICER 
FUNERALS.
IT IS ENOUGH.
IT IS ENOUGH.
THERE'S BEEN PLENTY OF GOOD 
IDEAS FROM MEMBERS OF THE UNITED
STATES CONGRESS BUT THERE'S BEEN
NO ACTION.
AS PRESIDENT I WILL TAKE ACTION.
>> MAYOR BUTTIGIEG, I WANT TO 
BRING YOU IN ON THIS, SIR.
A LOT OF CONVERSATIONS ABOUT 
ASSAULT RIFLES THAT ARE OFTEN 
DESIGNATED AS MILITARY STYLE 
WEAPONS.
YOU'RE THE ONLY PERSON ON THE 
STAGE WITH MILITARY EXPERIENCE 
AT A VETERAN OF THE IRAQ WAR.
DO YOU BELIEVE THAT MILITARY 
FAMILIES OR AMERICA'S VETERANS 

Spanish: 
PRESIDENTA, LE DARÉ 100 DÍAS AL 
CONGRESO Y SI NO PRESENTAN UNA 
LEY, PRESENTAR UN DECRETO EJ
EJECUTIVO Y IMPLEMENTAR EN LA 
POLÍTICA DE REVISIÓN DE ANT
ANTECEDENTES MÁS ESTRICTA.
 HARÉ QUE SE RETIRE LA LICENCIA 
DE LOS VENDEDORES DE ARMAS QUE
INFRINJAN LA LEY. COMO FISCAL Y 
VISTO MÁS FOTOGRAFÍAS DE 
AUTOPSIAS DE LAS QUE ME G
GUSTARÍA, HE TENIDO A MADRES DE 
VÍCTIMAS DOMICILIADAS EN MI O
OFICINA Y HE ASISTIDO A F
FUNERALES DE POLICÍAS. ESTO DEBE
TERMINAR.
 LOS MIEMBROS DEL CONGRESO HAN 
PRESENTADO BUENAS IDEAS Y NADA 
HA SUCEDIDO.
>>>  ALCALDE BUTTIGIEG, ¿ CUÁL 
ES SU OPINIÓN?
 USTED ES LA ÚNICA PERSONA AQUÍ 
QUE TIENE EXPERIENCIA MILITAR.

English: 
WILL AT LARGE HAVE A DIFFERENT 
TAKE ON THIS THAN THE OTHER 
AMERICANS WHO WE'VE OPINION 
TALKING ABOUT?
>> YEAH, OF COURSE, BECAUSE WE 
TRAINED ON SOME OF THESE KINDS 
OF WEAPONS.
LOOK, EVERY PART OF MY LIFE 
EXPERIENCE INFORMS ME, BEING THE
MAYOR OF A CITY WHERE THE WORST 
PART OF THE JOB IS DEALING WITH 
VIOLENCE.
WE LOSE AS MANY AS WERE LOST TO 
PARKLAND EVERY TWO OR THREE 
YEARS IN MY CITY ALONE, AND THIS
IS TEARING COMMUNITIES APART.
IF MORE GUNS MADE US SAFER, WE'D
BE THE SAFEST COUNTRY ON EARTH.
IT DOESN'T WORK THAT WAY.
AND COMMON SENSE MEASURES LIKE 
UNIVERSAL BACKGROUND CHECKS 
CAN'T SEEM TO GET DELIVERED BY 
WASHINGTON, EVEN WHEN MOST 
REPUBLICANS, LET ALONE MOST 
AMERICANS, AGREE IT'S THE RIGHT 
THING TO DO AND AS SOMEBODY WHO 
TRAINED ON WEAPONS OF WAR I CAN 
TELL YOU THAT THERE ARE WEAPONS 
THAT HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO PLACE IN
AMERICAN CITIES OR NEIGHBORHOODS
IN PEACETIME EVER. 
>> VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN, 30 

Spanish: 
 LAS FAMILIAS DE MILITARES--
 CREE QUE LAS FAMILIAS O LOS 
VETERANOS,  EN GENERAL, TENDRÁN 
UNA OPINIÓN DIFERENTE AL RESTO 
DE LOS ESTADOUNIDENSES?
><<  POR SUPUESTO, PORQUE 
ENTRENAMOS CON ESTAS ARMAS.
 SER ALCALDE DE UNA CIUDAD EN 
DONDE EL APPLE PARTE DEL TRABAJO
SE ENFRENTAR LA VIOLENCIA ARM
ARMADA. EN MI CIUDAD PERDEMOS LA
MISMA CANTIDAD DE PERSONAS QUE 
SE PERDIERON EN PARKLAND.
 SI LAS ARMAS NOS HICIERAN UN 
LUGAR MÁS SEGURO, SERÍAMOS EL 
LUGAR MÁS SEGURO DEL MUNDO.
 PARECE QUE WASHINGTON NO QUIERE
QUE SE HAGA LA REVISIÓN DE A
ANTECEDENTES.
 COMO ALGUIEN QUE HA ENTRENADO, 
ARMAMENTO DE GUERRA, HAY ARMAS Y
NO TIENEN NADA QUE HACER EN LAS 

Spanish: 
CIUDADES DEL PAÍS.
 JAMÁS.
><<  VICEPRESIDENTE
>>>  ¿ 30 SEGUNDOS?
 SOY LA ÚNICA PERSONA QUE LOGRÓ 
ENFRENTAR Y VENCER A LA NRA.
 SEGUNDO, INCREMENTAMOS LA 
REVISIÓN DE ANTECEDENTES DURANTE
EL GOBIERNO DE OBAMA.
 LOGRAMOS LA PROHIBICIÓN DE 
RIFLES DE ASALTO.
 AMIGOS, ESCUCHEN, COMPRARÍA DE 
VUELTA LAS ARMAS.
 CREO QUE SE PUEDE LOGRAR,.
 DEBEMOS HACERLO Y ES BUENO 
GASTAR DINERO EN ESO.
 NINGÚN ARMA DEBIESE SER VENDIDA
A MENOS QUE EL GATILLO PUEDA SER
CALADO CON UN MEDIDOR BIOM
BIOMÉTRICO.
 EL ENEMIGO ES EL FABRICANTE DE 
LAS ARMAS.
>>>  LESTER HOLT TIENE LA SI

English: 
SECONDS.
>> REAL 30 SECONDS. 
>> A REAL 30 SECONDS. 
>> I'M ONLY PERSON THAT'S BEATEN
THE NRA NATIONALLY.
I'M THE GUY THAT GOT THE BRADY 
BILL PASSED, NUMBER ONE.
NUMBER TWO, WE INCREASE THAT HAD
BACKGROUND CHECK WHEN -- DURING 
THE OBAMA/BIDEN ADMINISTRATION 
AND I'M ALSO THE ONLY GUY THAT 
GOT ASSAULT WEAPONS BANNED AND 
THE NUMBER OF CLIPS IN A GUN 
BAND, AND SO, FOLKS, LOOK, AND I
WOULD BUY BACK THOSE WEAPONS.
WE ALREADY STARTED TALKING ABOUT
THAT.
WE TRIED TO GET IT DONE.
I THINK IT CAN BE DONE, AND IT 
SHOULD BE DEMANDED THAT WE DO IT
AND THAT'S A GOOD EXPENDITURE OF
MONEY AND LASTLY WE SHOULD HAVE 
SMART GUNS.
NO GUN SHOULD BE ABLE TO SHOW 
UNLESS YOUR BIOMETRIC MEASURE 
CAN PULL THE TRIGGER.
IT'S WITHIN OUR TRYING DO THAT.
OUR ENEMY IS THE GUN 
MANUFACTURERS, NOT THE NRA, THE 
GUN MANUFACTURER. 
>> THE NRA IS TAKING ORDERS FROM
THE GUN MANUFACTURERS. 
>> LESTER HOLT HAS OUR NEXT 
QUESTION. 
>> TAKE IT AWAY. 
>> A QUESTION FROM OUR VIEWERS.

Spanish: 
SIGUIENTE PREGUNTA.
>>  ES UNA PREGUNTA DE LOS 
TELEVIDENTES.
 MUCHOS TEMEN QUE LA 
ADMINISTRACIÓN ACTUAL HAYA D
DAÑADO NUESTRAS INSTITUCIONES Y 
NORMAS EN EL PROCESO ADEMÁS 
NUESTRA REPUTACIÓN.
¿ QUÉ LES PARECE IMPORTANTE PARA
REVERTIR ESTE DAÑO?
 SENADOR BENET.
>>>  EXCELENTE PREGUNTA. PRIMERO
QUE TODO, EL MÁS RESTAURAR N
NUESTRA DEMOCRACIA.
 TENEMOS UN PRESIDENTE QUE NO 
CREE EN EL DERECHO, EN LIBERTAD 
DE PRENSA, LA INDEPENDENCIA J
JUDICIAL, CREE LA CORRUPCIÓN QUE
ÉL REPRESENTAN WASHINGTON. ESOS 
LO QUE DEBEMOS CAMBIAR.
 AGRADEZCO QUE TODOS ESTÉN AQUÍ 
PARA ENFRENTAR ESO.
 DEBEMOS RESTAURAR LAS R
RELACIONES QUE ÉL HA DESTRUIDO 

English: 
WE PUT SOME SUGGESTIONS THAT 
MAYBE THEY COULD SHARE ONE.
THIS IS FROM KATHLEEN IN OREGON.
MANY FEAR THE CURRENT 
ADMINISTRATION HAS INFLICTED 
IRREVOCABLE HARM ON OUR 
GOVERNING INSTITUTIONS AND NORMS
AND THE PROCESS ON OUR 
REPUTATION ABROAD.
THE QUESTION IS WHAT DO YOU SEE 
AS IMPORTANT EARLY STEPS IN 
REVERSING THE DAMAGE DONE, AND 
WE'LL PUT THIS ONE TO SENATOR 
BENNETT. 
>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH, WHAT AN 
EXCELLENT QUESTION.
FIRST OF ALL, WE HAVE TO RESTORE
OUR DEMOCRACY AT HOME.
THE REST OF THE WORLD IS LOCKING
FOR US IN LEADERSHIP.
WE HAVE A PRESIDENT WHO DOESN'T 
BELIEVE IN THE RULE OF LAW OR 
THE FREEDOM OF PRESS OR OR 
INDEPENDENT JUDICIARY BUT 
BELIEVES IN THE CORRUPTION THAT 
HE'S BROUGHT TO WASHINGTON, D.C.
AND THAT IS WHAT WE HAVE TO 
CHANGE AND THAT'S WHY EVERYBODY 
IS UP HERE TONIGHT AND I 
APPRECIATE THE FACT THAT THEY 
ARE UP HERE FOR THAT REASON.
SECOND, WE'VE GOT -- WE'VE GOT 
TO RESTORE THE RELATIONSHIPS 
THAT HE'S DESTROYED WITH OUR 
ALLIES, NOT JUST IN EUROPE.
HE FLEW TO THE G20 LAST NIGHT 

Spanish: 
CON NUESTROS ALIADOS, NO SOLO EN
EUROPA.
 ANOCHE FUE AL G-20 Y  ATACÓ A 
JAPÓN, ALEMANIA Y NO DIJO NADA 
DE RUSIA O COREA DEL NORTE.
 CUANDO TENEMOS UNA SITUACIÓN EN
QUE UN PRESIDENTE DICE QUE ALGO 
SUCEDIÓ EN LAS CALLES DE OR  OT 
NACIÓN Y EL MUNDO NO SABE SI 
CREERLE O NO,  ESO ES UN TEMA 
MUY IMPORTANTE Y GRAVE.
>>>  MUCHAS GRACIAS.
>>
 PROBABLEMENTE TENDRÁN QUE 
REHACER LAS RELACIONES CON OTRAS
NACIONES O ENTIDADES Y SON EL
ELEGIDOS,  DEBIDO A QUE ALGO 
HIZO TRUMP,.
¿ CON QUIÉN QUISIERAN VOLVER A 
RELACIONARSE?

English: 
AND ATTACKED JAPAN, GERMANY AND 
A THIRD ALLY OF OURS WITHOUT 
SAYING ANYTHING ABOUT NORTH 
KOREA OR RUSSIA, AND -- AND WHEN
YOU'VE GOT A SITUATION WHERE YOU
HAVE A PRESIDENT WHO SAYS 
SOMETHING HAPPENED IN THE STRAIT
OF HORMUZ AND THE WHOLE WORLD 
DOESN'T KNOW WHETHER TO BELIEVE 
IT OR NOT, THAT'S A HUGE PROBLEM
WHEN IT COMES TO THE NATIONAL 
SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA?
THIS IS A PERFECT TIME FOR ME TO
DO ANOTHER ONE OF THESE DOWN THE
LINE AND THIS IS WHAT THIS 
QUESTION IS WHICH IS WHAT YOU'VE
GOT TO HAVE TO -- YOU'RE LIKELY 
GOING HAVE TO RESET A 
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AMERICA AND
ANOTHER COUNTRY OR ENTITY IF YOU
BECOME PRESIDENT BECAUSE OF 
PERHAPS -- PERHAPS BECAUSE OF 
SOME RELATIONSHIP YOU JUST 
MENTIONED ABOUT PRESIDENT TRUMP.
WHAT'S THE FIRST RELATIONSHIP 
YOU WOULD LIKE TO RESET AS 
PRESIDENT AND I'LL GO DOWN THE 
LINE STARTING WITH MISS 
WILLIAMSON. 
>> ONE OF MY FIRST PHONE CALLS 
WOULD BE TO CALL THE EUROPEAN 
LEADERS TO SAY WE'RE BACK 
BECAUSE I TOTALLY UNDERSTAND HOW
IMPORTANT IT IS THAT THE UNITED 
STATES BE PART OF THE WESTERN 

English: 
ALLIANCE. 
>> TRYING TO GET ONE OR TWO 
WORDS HERE.
I HEAR YOU.
GOVERNOR HICK LOOPER.
>> I TALK ABOUT CONSTANT 
ENGAGEMENT AND THE FIRST COUNTRY
I WOULD GO TO, AND I UNDERSTAND 
THEY HAVE BEEN CHEATING AND 
STEALING, WOULD BE CHINA. 
>> OKAY. 
>> WE HAVE TO DEAL WITH ALL THE 
CHALLENGES OF THE GLOBE, WE'VE 
GOT TO HAVE RELATIONSHIPS WITH 
EVERYBODY. 
>> WE'RE TRYING TO SQUEEZE IN A 
COUPLE MORE THINGS. 
>> CHINA, WE NEED TO COOPERATE 
WITH THEM ON CLIMATE CHANGE AND 
AI AND OTHER ISSUES. 
>> THANKS FOR THE QUICK SGLES 
MAYOR BUTTIGIEG. 
>> WE DON'T KNOW WHO THE ALLIES 
HE'LL PISS OFF WORSE BETWEEN NOW
AND THEN.
THE RELATIONSHIP WITH THE ENTIRE
WORLD NEEDS TO CHANGE AND IT 
STARTS BY MODELING AMERICAN 
VALUES AS HOME. 
>> MR. VICE PRESIDENT, TRYING TO
BE QUICK. 
>> WE KNOW NATO WILL FALL APART 
IF HE'S ELECTED FOUR MORE YEARS,
THE SINGLE MOST CONSEQUENCE 
ALLIANCE IN THE UNITED STATES. 
>> SENATOR SANDERS.
>> IT'S NOT ONE COUNTRY.
I THINK IT'S REBUILDING TRUST IN
THE UNITED NATIONS AND 
UNDERSTAND THAT WE CAN SOLVE 
CONFLICTS WITHOUT WAR BUT WITH 
DIPLOMACY. 

Spanish: 
>>>  LLAMARÍA A LOS LÍDERES 
EUROPEOS LE DIRÍA "ESTAMOS DE 
VUELTA",.
 ENTIENDO QUE ES IMPORTANTE QUE 
ESTADOS UNIDOS SEA PARTE DE LA 
ALIANZA.
>>>  GOBERNADOR HICKENLOOPER.
>>>  LO PRIMERO QUE HARÍA SERÍA 
HABLAR CON CHINA.
 TENEMOS QUE RELACIONARNOS CON 
TODOS.
>>> YANG,.
>>>  NECESITAMOS COOPERAR CON 
CHINA.
>>>  ALCALDE BUTTIGIEG
>>>  NO SABEMOS CUÁLES SON N
NUESTROS ALIADOS EN ESTE 
MOMENTO.
 NUESTRA RELACIÓN CON EL MUNDO 
DEBE CAMBIAR,.
 DEBEMOS MODELAR LOS VALORES EN 
CASA.
>>> OTAN  SE CAERÁ A PEDAZOS Y 
ES REELECTO.
>>>  NO SE TRATA DE UN SOLO P
PAÍS. DEMOS VOLVER A GENERA C

English: 
>> SENATOR HARRIS. 
>> ALL THE MEMBERS OF THE NATO 
ALLIANCE. 
>> SENATOR GILLIBRAND. 
>> PRESIDENT TRUMP IS HELL BENT 
ON STARTING A WAR WITH IRAN.
MY FIRST ACT WILL BE TO ENGAGE 
IRAN, TO STABILIZE THE MIDDLE 
EAST AND MAKE SURE WE DO NOT 
START AN UNWANTED NEVER ENDING 
WAR. 
>> SENATOR BENNETT QUICKFULLY. 
>> OUR EUROPEAN ALLIES AND EVERY
LATIN AMERICAN COUNTRY THAT'S 
WILLING TO HAVE A CONVERSATION 
ABOUT HOW TO DEAL WITH THE 
REFUGEE CRISIS.
>> CONGRESSMAN SWALWELL. 
>> FIRST ACT AS FOREIGN POLICY 
WAS BREAKING UP WITH RUSSIA AND 
MAKING UP WITH NATO. 
>> THANK YOU ALL. 
>> ONE QUESTION FOR VICE 
PRESIDENT BIDEN TONIGHT.
YOU'VE MADE YOUR DECADES OF 
EXPERIENCE IN FOREIGN POLICY A 
PILLAR OF YOUR CAMPAIGN, BUT 
WHEN THE TIME CAME TO SAY YES OR
NO ON ONE OF THE MOST 
CONSEQUENTIAL FOREIGN POLICY 
DECISIONS OF THE LAST CENTURY 
YOU VOTED FOR THE IRAQ WAR.
YOU HAVE SINCE SAID YOU REGRET 
THAT VOTE.
WHY SHOULD VOTERS TRUST YOUR 
JUDGMENT WHEN IT COMES TO MAKING
A DECISION ABOUT TAKING THE 
COUNTRY TO WAR THE NEXT TIME?
>> BECAUSE ONCE THE -- ONCE BUSH

Spanish: 
CONFIANZA EN LAS NACIONES 
UNIDAS.
>>>  SENADORA HARRIS
>>> 
LAOTAN,.
>>>  MI PRIMERA ACCIÓN SERÍA 
ESTABILIZAR EL MEDIO OESTE Y NO 
GENERAR UNA GUERRA ETERNA.
>>>  LODS  ALIADOS EUROPEOS Y LS
LAS NACIONES LATINOAMERICANAS.
>>>  CONGRESISTA.
>>>  DEJAR DE TRABAJAR CON RUSIA
Y HACER LAS COSAS BIEN CON LA 
OTAN
>>>  VICEPRESIDENTE,  LA 
POLÍTICA EXTERIOR FUE UN PILAR, 
PERO CUANDO TUVO QUE DECIDIR 
SOBRE UNA DE LAS COSAS MÁS 
IMPORTANTES DEL ÚLTIMO SIGLO, 
VOTO A FAVOR DE LA GUERRA DE 
IRAK.
¿ POR QUÉ DEBIÉSEMOS CONFIAR EN 

Spanish: 
SU CRITERIO AL MOMENTO DE LLEVAR
AL PAÍS A LA GUERRA?
>>>  YO ME ASEGURÉ DE SACAR LAS 
TROPAS DE IRAK. YO LOGRÉ SACAR A
150,000 TROPAS DE IRAK.
 MI HIJO ERA UNO DE ELLOS.
 NO DEBEMOS TENER TROPAS DE 
COMBATE EN AFGANISTÁN.
 DEBEMOS SALIR DE AHÍ. TERCERO, 
NO ENCONTRAREMOS A NADIE MÁS QUE
HAYA ENFRENTADO A LA VERDADERA 
AMENAZA.
 ELIMINARÍA QUE ENTREMOS A LA 
GUERRA Y ME ASEGURARÍA DE QUE 
ESTO SE PUEDO UTILIZAR SOLO PARA
EL PROPÓSITO ORIGINAL, ATACAR AL

English: 
BOOZE THAT HAD POWER WHAT 
HAPPENED WAS HE GOT ELECTED 
AFTER THAT I MADE THE PRESIDENT 
TURNED TO ME AND SAID GET OUR 
COMBAT TROOPS OUT OF IRAQ.
I WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR GETTING 
150,000 COMBAT TROOPS OUT OF 
IRAQ AROUND MY SON WAS ONE OF 
THEM.
I ALSO THINK WE SHOULD NOT HAVE 
COMBAT TROOPS IN AFGHANISTAN.
IT'S HONG OVERDUE.
IT SHOULD END, AND THIRDLY I 
BELIEVE THAT YOU'RE NOT GOING TO
FIND ANYBODY WHO HAS PULLED 
TOGETHER MORE OF OUR ALLIANCES 
TO DEAL WITH WHAT IS THE REAL 
STATED THREAT OUT THERE.
WE CAN'T GO IT ALONE IN TERMS OF
DEALING WITH TERRORISM SO I 
WOULD ELIMINATE THE ACT THAT 
ALLOWED US TO GO INTO WAR AND 
NOT THE AMF AND MAKE SURE THAT 
IT CAN ONLY BE USED FOR WHAT ITS
INTENT WAS, AND THAT IS TO GO 
AFTER TERRORISTS BUT NEVER DO IT
ALONE.
THAT'S WHY WE HAVE TO REPAIR OUR
ALLIANCES.
WE PUT TOGETHER 56 COUNTRIES TO 
MAKE SURE WE DEALT WITH ISIS IN 
IRAQ AND OTHER PLACES.
THAT'S WHAT I WOULD DO.

English: 
THAT'S WHAT I HAVE DONE AND I 
KNOW HOW TO DO IT. 
>> SENATOR SANDERS, 30 SECONDS. 
>> ONE OF THE DIFFERENCES IS 
THAT JOE AND I HAVE IN OUR 
RECORD IS JOE VOTED FOR THAT 
WAR, I HELPED LEAD THE 
OPPOSITION TO THAT WAR WHICH WAS
A TOTAL DISASTER.
SECOND OF ALL, I HELPED LEAD THE
EFFORT FOR THE FIRST TIME TO 
UTILIZE THE WAR POWERS ACT TO 
GET THE UNITED STATES OUT OF THE
SORTIE-LED INTERVENTION IN YEMEN
WHICH IS THE MOST HORRIFIC 
HUMANITARIAN DISASTER ON EARTH, 
AND THIRDLY, LET ME BE VERY 
CLEAR, I WILL DO EVERYTHING I 
CAN TO PREVENT A WAR WITH IRAN 
WHICH WOULD BE FAR WORSE THAN 
DISASTROUS WAR WITH IRAQ. 
>> THANK YOU, GUYS.
YOU GET MORE TIME TO TALK BUT I 
HAVE TO SNEAK IN ONE MORE BREAK.
WE'LL BE RIGHT BACK WITH MORE 
DEBATE.

Spanish: 
TERRORISMO, PERO NO HACERLO 
SOLOS. DEBEMOS RESTAURAR 
NUESTRAS ALIANZAS.
 ESO ES LO QUE HARÍA.
 SÉ CÓMO HACERLO.
>>>  SENADOR SANDERS.
>>>  UNA DE LAS DIFERENCIAS ES
QUE JO  VOTÓ A FAVOR DE ESTO. 
FUE UN DESASTRE.
 YO ABOGUE PARA SACAR A ESTADOS 
UNIDOS DE LA INTERVENCIÓN EN Y
YEMEN,  UNA DE LAS COSAS MÁS 
TERRIBLES. TERCERO, QUIERO SER 
MUY CLARO. HARÉ TODO LO QUE 
PUEDA PARA EVITAR GUERRA CON I
IRÁN,.
 ESO SERÍA MUCHO PEOR QUE LA 
GUERRA CON IRAK.
>>> HICOS,  LA BUENA NOTICIA 
ES QUE PODRÁN HABLAR,  PERO 
DEBEMOS IR A UNA PAUSA.
 YA VOLVEMOS.

Spanish: 
(MÚSICA).
(MÚSICA).
(MÚSICA).
(APLAUSOS). 
(APLAUSOS). 
>>> ESTAMOS DE VUELTA.
 CADA CANDIDATO TENDRÁ LA 
OPORTUNIDAD FINAL DE ENVIAR SU 
MENSAJE. 45 SEGUNDOS.
>>>  CONGRESISTA.

English: 
WE'LL BE RIGHT BACK WITH MORE 
[ APPLAUSE ]
>> WE ARE BACK IN MIAMI.
NOW EACH CANDIDATE WILL HAVE A 
FINAL CHANCE TO MAKE THEIR CASE 
TO THE VOTERS.
45 SECONDS EACH.
WE BEGIN WITH CONGRESSMAN 
SWALWELL.
>> WE CAN'T BE A FORWARD LOOKING
PARTY IF WE LOOK TO THE PAST FOR
OUR LEADERSHIP.
I'M A CONGRESSMAN BUT ALSO A 
FATHER OF A 2-YEAR-OLD AND AN 
INFANT.

English: 
WHEN I'M NOT CHANGING DIAPERS, 
I'M CHANGING WASHINGTON.
MOST OF THE TIME THE DIAPERS 
SMELL BETTER.
I WENT TO CONGRESS AT 31 AND I 
FOUND A WASHINGTON THAT DOESN'T 
WORK FOR PEOPLE LIKE YOU AND ME.
IT'S MADE OF THE RICH AND THE 
DISCONNECTED.
I WAS THE FIRST IN MY FAMILY TO 
GO TO COLLEGE AND HAVE STUDENT 
LOAN DEBT SO I'VE LED THE EFFORT
TO ELECT THE NEXT GENERATION OF 
MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND WE HAVE 
A MOMENT TO SEIZE.
THIS IS A CAN-DO GENERATION.
THIS IS A GENERATION THAT WILL 
END CLIMATE CHAOS.
THIS IS A GENERATION THAT WILL 
SOLVE STUDENT LOAN DEBT AND THIS
IS THE GENERATION THAT WILL SAY 
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH AND END GUN 
VIOLENCE THIS.
GENERATION DEMANDS BOLD 
SOLUTIONS.
THAT'S WHY I'M RUNNING FOR 
PRESIDENT. 
>> CONGRESSMAN, THANK YOU.
>> MISS WILLIAMSON, 45 SECONDS. 
>> I'M SORRY WE HAVEN'T TALKED 
MORE TONIGHT ABOUT HOW WE'RE 
GOING TO BEAT DONALD TRUMP.
I HAVE AN IDEA ABOUT DONALD 
TRUMP.
DONALD TRUMP IS NOT GOING TO BE 
BEATEN JUST BY INSIDER POLITICS.
HE'S NOT GOING TO BE BEATEN BY 
SOMEBODY WHO HAS A PLAN.
HE'S GOING TO BE BEATEN BY 
SOMEBODY WHO HAS AN IDEA WHAT 
THIS MAN HAS DONE.
THIS HAN HAS REACHED INTO THE 

Spanish: 
>>>  NO DEBEMOS SEGUIR MIRANDO 
AL PASADO EN BÚSQUEDA DE L
LIDERAZGO. SE CONGRESISTA Y 
PADRE.
 CUANDO NO CAMBIO PAÑALES, 
QUIERO CAMBIAR A WASHINGTON.
 POR LO GENERAL, EL PAÑAL HUELE 
MEJOR.
 VEO UN WASHINGTON QUE NO FU
FUNCIONA A FAVOR DEL PUEBLO. YO 
FUI EL PRIMERO EN IR A LA 
UNIVERSIDAD DE MI FAMILIA. L
LIDERO EL ESFUERZO PARA ELIGIR A
LA NUEVA GENERACIÓN DE LID
LIDERAZGO. ESTA EN LA GENERACIÓN
QUE LE PONDRÁ FIN AL CAOS P
POLÍTICO, ES LA GENERACIÓN QUE 
DIRÁ QUE ES SUFICIENTE PARA 
TERMINAR LA VIOLENCIA ARMADA.
 DEMANDAMOS LAS SOLUCIONES.
>>>  GRACIAS CONGRESISTA.
>>>  SIENTO NO HABER HABLADO MÁS
DE CÓMO VENCER A DONAL TRUMP.
 DONALD TRUMP  NO SERÁ VENCIDO 

Spanish: 
POR ALGUIEN CON UN PLAN, SERÁ 
VENCIDO CON ALGUIEN QUE ENTIENDA
LO QUE ÉL HA HECHO.
 ESCUCHÓ LA ASÍ QUE DE LA GENTE.
 SEÑOR PRESIDENTE, SI ESTÁ 
ESCUCHANDO, QUIERO QUE ME E
ESCUCHE.
 SOLO EL AMOR LO VENCERÁ.
 SIENTO QUE SÉ LO QUE ESTÁ 
HACIENDO, YO LO ENFRENTARE CON 
AMOR.
 LO VENCEREMOS CON AMOR.
>>>  SENADOR BENET.
>>>  GRACIAS.
 MI MADRE Y SUS PADRES LLEGARON 
A ESTADOS UNIDOS PARA REC
RECONSTRUIR SUS VIDAS.
 300 AÑOS ANTES DE ESO MI 
FAMILIA VINO EN BÚSQUEDA DE LA
LIBERTAD DE CREDO.
 LA CAPACIDAD DE UNA GENERACIÓN 
DE HACER LO MEJOR QUE EL OTRO 
ESTÁ EN RIESGO EN ESTADOS UN
UNIDOS, EN ESPECIAL ENTRE NIÑOS 
QUE VIVEN EN POBREZA, COMO CON 

English: 
PSYCHE OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE 
AND HE'S HARNESSED FEAR FOR 
POLITICAL PURPOSES.
SO, MR. PRESIDENT, IF YOU'RE 
LISTENING, I WANT YOU TO HEAR 
ME, PLEASE.
YOU HAVE HARNESSED FEAR FOR 
POLITICAL PURPOSES AND ONLY LOVE
CAN CAST THAT OUT SO I, SIR, I 
HAVE A FEELING YOU KNOW WHAT 
YOU'RE DOING.
I'M GOING TO HARNESS LOVE FOR 
POLITICAL PURPOSES.
I WILL MEET YOU ON THAT FIELD 
AND, SIR, LOVE WILL WIN. 
>> THANK YOU.
>> SENATOR BENNETT. 
>> THANK YOU, THANK YOU.
>> MY MOM AND HER PARENTS CAME 
TO THE UNITED STATES TO REBUILD 
THEIR SHATTERED LIVES.
IN THE ONLY COUNTRY THAT THEY 
COULD.
300 YEARS BEFORE THAT MY 
PARENT'S FAMILY CAME SEARCHING 
RELIGIOUS FREEDOM HERE.
THE ABILITY FROM ONE GENERATION 
TO DO BETTER THAN THE NEXT IS 
NOW SEVERELY AT RISK IN THE 
UNITED STATES, ESPECIALLY AMONG 
CHILDREN LIVING IN POVERTY LIKE 
THE ONES I USED TO WORK FOR IN 
THE DENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
THAT'S WHY I'M RUNNING FOR 
PRESIDENT.
I'VE HAD TWO TOUGH RACES IN 

Spanish: 
LOS QUE YO TRABAJABA EN LAS 
ESCUELAS PÚBLICAS DE DÉNVER.
 TUVE DOS CRISIS EN COLORADO.
 LOGRÉ UNIR A LA GENTE CON 
HECHOS Y NO CON PROMESAS.
 LA IDEA ES VENCER A TRUMP, 
VENCER LA CORRUPCIÓN EN W
WASHINGTON Y GENERAR CON UNA N
NUEVA ERA EN ESTADOS UNIDOS.
 SERÁ DIFÍCIL,  PERO ES LO QUE 
NUESTROS PADRES ESPERAN Y LO QUE
NUESTROS HIJOS MERECEN.
>>>  GOBERNADOR HICKENLOOPER.
>>>  EXPANDÍ MOSS LA SALUD 
REPRODUCTIVA,.
 SOMOS EL PRIMER ESTADO QUE 
LEGALIZÓ LA MARIHUANA Y TRA
TRANSFORMAMOS EL SISTEMA 
JUDICIAL. APROBAMOS LA REVISIÓN 

English: 
COLORADO BY BRINGING PEOPLE 
TOGETHER AND NOT BY MAKING EMPTY
PROMISES AND I BELIEVE WE NEED 
TO BUILD A BROAD COALITION OF 
AMERICANS TO BEAT DONALD TRUMP 
AND THE CORRUPTION IN WASHINGTON
AND BUILD A NEW ERA OF THE 
AMERICAN DEMOCRACY AND AMERICAN 
OPPORTUNITY.
THIS IS GOING TO BE HARD TO DO, 
BUT IT'S WHAT OUR PARENTS WOULD 
HAVE EXPECTED.
IT'S WHAT OUR KIDS DESERVE.
I HOPE YOU JOIN ME IN THIS 
EFFORT.
THANK YOU.
>> THANK YOU.
>> GOVERNOR HICKENLOOPER.
>> I'M A SMALL BUSINESS OWNER 
WHO BROUGHT THAT SAME SCRAPPY 
SPIRIT TO COLORADO, ONE OF THE 
MOST PROGRESSIVE STATES IN 
AMERICA.
WE STAND IN REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 
TO REDUCE TEENAGE ABORTION BY 
64%.
WE'RE THE FIRST STATE TO 
LEGALIZE MARIJUANA AND WE 
TRANSFORMED OUR DEFICITS INTO 
THE PROCESS.
WE PASSED UNIVERSAL BACKGROUND 
CHECKS IN A PURPLE STATE AND GOT
TO NEAR UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE 
COVERAGE AND ATTACKED CLIMATE 
CHANGE WITH THE TOUGHEST METHANE
REGULATIONS IN THE COUNTRY AND 
FOR THE LAST THREE YEARS WE'VE 
BEEN THE NUMBER ONE ECONOMY IN 
AMERICA.

Spanish: 
DE ANTECEDENTES.
 ATACAMOS EL CAMBIO CLIMÁTICO 
CON LAS REGULACIONES MÁS ES
ESTRICTAS DEL PAÍS Y DURANTE LOS
ÚLTIMOS TRES AÑOS SOMOS LA MEJOR
ECONOMÍA DEL PAÍS.
 NO NECESITAMOS QUE GRANDES 
GOBIERNOS HAGAN GRANDES COSAS, 
LO SÉ, PORQUE SOY EL QUE MÁS 
COSAS PROGRESISTAS HA HECHO. SI 
NOS VAMOS HACIA EL SOCIALISMO, 
TENEMOS EL RIESGO DE REELEGIR AL
PEOR PRESIDENTE DE LA HISTORIA 
EN OTRO PAÍS.
>>>  SENADORA GILLIBRAND
>>>  LAS MUJERES EN EL PAÍS 
ESTÁN EN LLAMAS. NOS HEMOS 
ORGANIZADO, HEMOS MARCHADO, 
FUIMOS ELECTAS,  PERO NUESTROS 
DERECHOS ESTÁN BAJO ATAQUE POR 
PARTE DEL PRESIDENTE TRUMP Y LOS
REPUBLICANOS. POR ESO FUI A L
LUCHAR AIORIA.
 COMO PRESIDENTA, LUCHARÉ EN LOS
FRENTES QUE NADIE MÁS LUCHA.

English: 
YOU DON'T NEED BIG GOVERNMENT TO
DO BIG THINGS.
I KNOW THAT BECAUSE I'M THE ONE 
PERSON UP HERE WHO HAS ACTUALLY 
DOESN'T BIG PROGRESSIVE THINGS 
EVERYONE SELLS TALKING ABOUT.
IF WE TURN TOWARDS SOCIALISM, WE
RUN THE RISK OF HELPING TO 
RE-ELECT THE WORST PRESIDENT IN 
AMERICAN HISTORY. 
>> THANK YOU, GOVERNOR. 
>> SENATOR GILL BRAND, YOU HAVE 
THE FLOOR FOR 45 SECONDS. 
>> WOMEN IN AMERICA ARE ON FIRE.
WE'VE MARCHED, WE'VE ORGANIZED 
AND WE'VE RUN FOR OFFICE AND WE 
WON, BUT OUR RIGHTS ARE UNDER 
ATTACK LIKE NEVER BEFORE BY 
PRESIDENT TRUMP AND THE 
REPUBLICANS WHO WANT TO REPEAL 
"ROE V. WADE" WHICH IS WHY I 
WENT TO THE FRONT LINES IN 
GEORGIA TO FIGHT FOR THEM.
AS PRESIDENT I WILL TAKE ON THE 
FIGHTS THAT NO ONE ELSE WILL.
I STOOD UP TO THE PENTAGON AND 
REPEALED DON'T ISN'T DON'T TELL.
I STOOD UP TO THE BANKS AND 
VOTED AGAINST THE BAILOUT TWICE.
I STOOD UP TO TRUMP MORE THAN 
ANY OTHER SENATOR IN THE U.S. 
SENATE AND I HAVE THE MOST 
COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH FOR 

English: 
GETTING MONEY OUT OF POLITICS 
WITH PUBLICLY FUNDED ELECTIONS 
TO DEAL WITH POLITICAL 
CORRUPTION.
NOW IS NOT THE TIME TO PLAY IT 
SAFE.
NOW IS NOT THE TIME TO BE AFRAID
OF FIRSTS.
WE NEED A PRESIDENT WHO WILL 
TAKE ON THE BIG CHALLENGES EVEN 
IF SHE STANDS ALONE.
JOIN ME IN FIGHTING FOR THIS. 
>> SENATOR GILLIBRAND, THANK 
YOU.
>> MR. YANG, YOU HAVE HAD A 
SECONDS FOR YOUR CLOSING.
>> AFFIRMATIVE ACTION I WANT TO 
THANK EVERYONE WHO PUT ME ON THE
STAGE TONIGHT.
I AM PROOF THAT OUR DEMOCRACY 
STILL WORKS.
DEMOCRATS AND AMERICANS AROUND 
THE COUNTRY HAVE ONE QUESTION 
FOR THEIR NOMINEE AND THAT IS 
WHO CAN BEAT DONALD TRUMP IN 
2020.
THAT IS THE RIGHT QUESTION, AND 
THE RIGHT CANDIDATE TO BEAT 
DONALD TRUMP WILL BE SOLVING THE
PROBLEMS THAT GOT DONALD TRUMP 
ELECTED AND WILL HAVE A VISION 
OF A TRICKLE UP ECONOMY THAT'S 
ALREADY DRAWING THOUSANDS OF 
DISAFFECTED TRUMP VOTERS, 
CONSERVATIVES AND LIBERTARIANS 
AS WELL AS DEMOCRATS AND 
PROGRESS I WAS, I AM THAT CANNED
DAY.
I CAN BUILD A MUCH BROADER 
COALITION TO BEAT DONALD TRUMP.
IT'S NOT LEFT.
IT IS NOT RIGHT.
IT IS FORWARD AND THAT'S WHERE I
I'LL TAKE THE COUNTRY IN 2020.

Spanish: 
 ME ENFRENTE A LOS BANCOS EN DOS
OCASIONES. ME HE ENFRENTADO MÁS 
A TRUMP IGUAL QUE HAY SENADOR.
 SÉ CÓMO SACAR EL DINERO DE LAS 
ELECCIONES.
 AHORA NO ES EL MOMENTO DE NO 
ARRIESGARSE,.
 NECESITAMOS A UN PRESIDENTE QUE
ENFRENTE LOS DESAFÍOS,,
 ACOMPÁÑENME EN ESTA LUCHA.
>>>  SEÑOR YANG
>>>  QUIERO AGRADECER A TODOS 
LOS QUE ME PUSIERON AQUÍ. SOY LA
PRUEBA DE QUE NUESTRA DEMOCRACIA
FUNCIONA.
 NUESTRO PAÍS TIENE SOLO UNA 
PREGUNTA, QUIÉN PUEDE VENCER A 
DONALD TRUMP,.
 EL CANDIDATO CORRECTO TRÉ 
RESOLVERÁ LOS PROBLEMAS 
QUISIERON QUE DONAL TRUMP FUERA 
ELECTO.
 YO SOY ESE CANDIDATO, PUDO 
GENERAR UNA COALICIÓN MÁS 

English: 
>> MR. YANG, THANK YOU.
>> SENATOR HARRIS, THE FLOOR IS 
YOURS. 
>> THANK YOU.
I JUST WANT TO LEAVE YOU WITH A 
COUPLE OF THINGS.
ONE, WE NEED A NOMINEE WHO HAS 
THE ABILITY TO PROSECUTE THE 
CASE AGAINST FOUR MORE YEARS OF 
DONALD TRUMP AND I WILL DO THAT.
SECOND, THIS ELECTION IS ABOUT 
YOU.
THIS IS ABOUT YOUR HOPES AND 
YOUR DREAMS AND YOUR FEARS AND 
WHAT WAKES YOU UP AT 3:00 IN THE
MORNING, AND THAT'S WHY I HAVE 
WHAT I CALL AL 3:00 A.M. AGENDA 
THAT'S ABOUT EVERYTHING FROM 
WHAT WE NEED TO DO TO DELIVER 
HEALTHCARE TO HOW YOU WILL BE 
ABLE TO PAY THE BILLS BY THE END
OF THE MONTH, AND WHEN I THINK 
ABOUT WHAT OUR COUNTRY NEEDS, 
YOU PROMISE YOU I WILL BE A 
PRESIDENT WHO LEADS WITH A SENSE
OF DIGNITY, WITH HONESTY, 
SPEAKING THE TRUTH AND GIVING 
THE AMERICAN FAMILY ALL THAT 
THEY NEED TO GET THROUGH THE END
OF THE MONTH IN A WAY THAT 
ALLOWS THEM TO PROSPER SO I HOPE

Spanish: 
POTENTE PARA VENCER A DONALD 
TRUMP,  NO ES DE IZQUIERDA, NI 
DERECHA, ES HACIA ADELANTE.
>>>  SENADORA HARRIS.
>>>  QUIERO DECIR UN PAR DE 
COSAS. PRIMERO, NECESITAMOS 
NOMINAR A UNA PERSONA QUE TENGA 
LA CAPACIDAD DE ENFRENTAR A 
DONAL TRUMP
 ESTA ELECCIÓN SE TRATA DE 
USTEDES, SE TRATA DE SUS ES
ESPERANZAS, SUEÑOS, MIEDOS Y QÉE
LOS RE DESPIERTA A LAS TRES DE  
MAÑANA.
 ES EL PROGRAMA DE LAS TRES DE 
LA MAÑANA, LO QUE TENEMOS QUE 
HACER DESDE SALUD PÚBLICA A CÓMO
PAGARÁN LAS CUENTAS.
 CUANDO PIENSO EN LO QUE DE 
NECESITAN OTRO PAÍS, SERÉ UNA 
PRESIDENTA QUE LIDERE CON 
DIGNIDAD, HONESTIDAD, CON LA 
VERDAD Y DÁNDOLE LAS FAMILIAS 

English: 
TO EARN YOUR SUPPORT.
PLEASE JOIN US AT 
KAMALAHARRIS.ORG. 
>> SENATOR, THANK YOU.
>> MAYOR BUTTIGIEG, 45 SECONDS.
>> NOTHING ABOUT POLITICS IS 
THEORETICAL TO ME.
I'VE HAD THE EXPERIENCE OF 
WRITING A LETTER TO MY FAMILY, 
PUTTING IT IN AN ENVELOPE MARKED
JUST IN CASE AND LEAVING IT 
WHERE THEY WOULD KNOW WHERE TO 
FIND IT IN CASE I DIDN'T COME 
BACK FROM AFGHANISTAN.
I'VE HAD THE EXPERIENCE OF 
INCOME A MARRIAGE THAT EXISTS BY
THE GRACE OF A SINGLE VOTE ON 
THE U.S. SUPREME COURT.
I HAVE THE EXPERIENCE OF GUIDING
A COMMUNITY WHERE THE PER CAPITA
INCOME WAS BELOW $20,000 WHEN I 
TOOK OFFICE INTO A BRIGHTER 
FUTURE.
I'M RUNNING BECAUSE THE 
DECISIONS WE MAKE IN THE NEXT 
THREE OR FOUR YEARS WILL DECIDE 
HOW THE NEXT 30 OR 40 GO AND 
WHEN I GET TO THE CURRENT AGE OF
THE CURRENT PRESIDENT IN THE 
YEAR 205 5I WANT TO BE ABLE TO 
LOOK BACK ON THESE YEARS AND SAY
MY GENERATION DELIVERED CLIMATE 
SOLUTIONS, RACIAL EQUALITY AND 
AN END TO ENDLESS WAR.
HELP ME DELIVER THAT NEW 
GENERATION TO WASHINGTON BEFORE 
IT'S TOO LATE.

Spanish: 
AMERICANAS LO QUE NECESITAN PARA
LLEGAR A FIN DE MES DE UNA 
MANERA PRÓSPERA.
 ESPERO QUE ME APOYEN,.
 ACOMPÁÑENNOS
>>>  ALCALDE BUTTIGIEG.
>>>  NADA DE LA POLÍTICA ES T
TEORÍA. HE TENIDO LA EXPERIENCIA
DE ESCRIBIR UNA CARTA A MI 
FAMILIA, PONERLA EN UN SOBRE Y  
DEJARLA EN UN LUGAR EN DONDE LA 
ENCONTRARÍA SI NO VOLVÍA DE 
AFGANISTÁN.
 EXISTO GRACIAS A UN SOLO VOTO.
 TENGO LA EXPERIENCIA DE LIDERAR
UNA C COMUNIDAD EN DONDE EL 
INGRESO O PER CÁPITA ERA DE M
MENOS DE $25,000.
 CUANDO LLEGUE A LA EDAD DE ESTE
PRESIDENTE, QUIERO ANALIZAR ESTO
Y DECIR QUE MI GENERACIÓN GENEÓO
LAS SOLUCIONES PARA LOS CAMBIOS 

Spanish: 
MEDIOAMBIENTALES, AYÚDAME A 
GENERAR ESTA NUEVA GENERACIÓN.
>>>  GRACIAS.
 SENADOR SANDERS
>>>  CREO QUE TODA LA PERSONAS 
DICEN QUE SON TODAS BUENAS 
PERSONAS, ¿ PERO POR QUÉ NADA 
CAMBIA?
¿ POR QUÉ DURANTE LOS ÚLTIMOS 45
AÑOS LOS SUELDOS NO HAN SUBIDO?
¿ POR QUÉ 45 MILLONES DE PE
PERSONAS TIENEN DEUDAS ESTUDIAN 
TA 
ESTUDIANTILES?
 NADA CAMBIARÁ A MENOS QUE TE
TENGAMOS LAS AGALLAS DE ENFR
ENFRENTAR A WALL STREET, LA I
INDUSTRIA DE LAS ASEGURADORAS, 
LAS FARMACÉUTICAS, LA INDUSTRIA 
MILITAR Y LA INDUSTRIA DE 
COMBUSTIBLES FÓSILES!
 SI NO LOS ENFRENTAMOS, SE

English: 
>> THANK YOU.
>> SENATOR SANDERS, 25 SECONDS.
THE FLOOR IS YOURS.
>> I SUSPECT PEOPLE OF THE 
COUNTRY WHO ARE WATCHING THIS 
DEBATE ARE SAYING THESE ARE THE 
PEOPLE, THEY HAVE GREAT IDEAS, 
BUT HOW COME NOTHING REALLY 
CHANGES?
HOW COME FOR THE LAST 45 YEARS 
WAGES HAVE BEEN STAGNANT FOR THE
MIDDLE CLASS?
HOW COME WE HAVE THE HIGHEST 
RATE OF CHILDHOOD POVERTY?
HOW COME 45 MILLION PEOPLE STILL
HAVE STUDENT DEBT?
HOW COME THREE PEOPLE ARE MORE 
WEALTHY THAN THE BOTTOM HALF OF 
AMERICA AND HERE IS THE ANSWER?
NOTHING WILL CHANGE UNLESS WE 
HAVE THE GUTS TO TAKE ON WALL 
STREET, THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY, 
THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY, THE
MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX AND 
THE FOSSIL FUEL INDUSTRY.
IF WE DON'T HAVE THE GUTS TO 
TAKE THEM ON, WE'LL CONTINUE TO 
HAVE PLANS.
WE'LL CONTINUE TO HAVE THOUGHTS 
AND THE RICH WILL GET RICHER AND
EVERYBODY ELSE WILL BE 
STRUGGLING. 

English: 
>> THANK YOU, SENATOR.
>> AND LASTLY WE'LL HEAR FROM 
VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN.
SIR, YOU HAVE 45 SECONDS. 
>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
I'M RUNNING TO LEAD THIS COUNTRY
BECAUSE I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT 
TO RESTORE THE SOUL THE NATION 
OF THE PRESIDENT.
THIS PRESIDENT HAS RIPPED IT 
OUT.
THE ONLY PRESIDENT WHO HAS 
EQUATED RACIST AND WHITE 
SUPREMACISTS WITH OTHER DEESE 
END PEOPLE AND HE'S THE ONLY 
PRESIDENT WHO HAS EMBRACED 
DICTATORS AND THUMBED THEIR NOSE
AT YOU'RE ALLY.
I'M SECONDLY RUNNING FOR 
PRESIDENT BECAUSE I THINK WE 
HAVE TO RESTORE THE BACKBONE OF 
AMERICA.
THE POOR AND HARD WORKING MIDDLE
CLASS PEOPLE YOU CAN'T DO THAT 
WITHOUT REPLACING THEM WITH THE 
DIGNITY THEY ONCE HAD.
LASTLY WE'VE GOT TO UNITE THE 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS MUCH
AS ANYBODY SAYS WE CAN'T.
IF WE DO THERE'S NOT A SINGLE 
THING THAT THE PEOPLE CAN'T DO.
THIS IS THE UNITED STATES OF 
AMERICA.
WE CAN DO ANYTHING IF WE'RE 
TOGETHER, TOGETHER.
SO GOD BLESS YOU ALL AND MAY GOD
PROTECT OUR TROOPS.
>> VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN, THANK 
YOU.

Spanish: 
SEGUIREMOS TENIENDO PLANES, 
HABLANDO,  Y LOS RICOS SEGUIRÁN 
ENRIQUECIÉNDOSE Y EL RESTO CADA 
VEZ MÁS POBRES.
>>>  VICEPRESIDENTE BIDEN,.
>>>  MUCHAS GRACIAS. ES I
IMPORTANTE RESTAURAR EL ALMA DE 
ESTA NACIÓN.
 ESTE PRESIDENTE LA DESTROZÓ.
 HA EQUIPARADO A LOS RACISTAS Y 
SUPREMACISTAS BLANCOS CON 
PERSONAS HONESTAS. ÉL HA ACOGIDO
A DICTADORES.
 QUIERO SER PRESIDENTE PORQUE 
QUEREMOS RESTAURAR LA COLUMNA 
VERTEBRAL DE ESTADOS UNIDOS, NO 
LO PODEMOS HACER SIN RESTAURAR 
LA DIGNIDAD QUE TENÍAN. DEBEMOS 
UNIR A LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS.
 SI LO HACEMOS, NO HAY NADA QUE 
NO PODAMOS HACER.
 ESTAMOS HABLANDO DE ESTADOS 
UNIDOS DE AMÉRICA, PODEMOS 
HACERLO TODOS Y ESTAMOS UNIDOS.
 QUE DIOS LOS BENDIGA Y QUE DIOS
BENDIGA NUESTRAS TROPAS.

English: 
>> WE WANT TO THANK OUR 
CANDIDATES.
WE'VE HAD TWO NIGHTS OF SPIRITED
DEBATE ON A RANGE OF ISSUES.
20 CANDIDATES IN ALL.
THANK ALL OF THE CANDIDATES LAST
NIGHT AND TONIGHT. 
>> THANKS FOR STICKING YOUR NECK
OUT LIKE THIS.
>> I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO THANK 
THE AUDIENCE FOR COMPLETELY 
IGNORING OUR SUGGESTIONS. 
>> THANKS TO THE DEMOCRATIC 
NATIONAL COMMITTEE AND THE 
DEMOCRATIC PARTY. 
>> AND, OF COURSE, THANK YOU TO 
EVERYONE HERE FOR HOST IS US 
HERE AND OUR TERRIFIC AUDIENCE.
FOR SAVANNAH, JOSE, CHUCK AND 
RACHEL, I'M LESTER HOLT.

Spanish: 
(APLAUSOS). 
(APLAUSOS). 
>>>  AGRADECEMOS A LOS CAN
CANDIDATOS.
 FUERON DOS NOCHES DE DEBATE . 
20 CANDIDATOS EN TOTAL. LE 
AGRADECEMOS A TODOS.
>>>  MUCHAS GRACIAS POR HABLAR 
AQUÍ.
 GRACIAS A USTEDES Y A LOS 10 
QUE TUVIERAN ANOCHE.
>>>  QUIERO AGRADECER A LA A
AUDIENCIA POR IGNORAR 
COMPLETAMENTE LA INSTRUCCIÓN QUE
LES DIMOS DE NO APLAUDIR.
>>>  MUCHAS GRACIAS A TODOS POR 
ACOMPAÑARNOS.
 DE PARTE DE SAVANNAH, JOSÉ, 
CHUCK, RACHEL Y MIA,  BUENAS 
NOCHES DESDE MIAMI.
(APLAUSOS). 
(APLAUSOS). 
(APLAUSOS). 

English: 
GOOD NIGHT, EVERYONE, FROM 
MIAMI.
♪
♪
EVERYONE HERE FOR HOST IS US 
>> WHAT A DEBATE NIGHT.
WELCOME BACK TO OUR SPECIAL 
COVERAGE OF THE SECOND NIGHT OF 

English: 
THE FIRST DEMOCRATIC DEBATE 
RIGHT HERE ON "NBC NEWS NOW."
THERE YOU HAVE IT, TWO NIGHTS, 
20 CANDIDATES IT.
THE CANDIDATES ARE WALKING OFF 
THE STAGE AS WE SPEAK.
JOE BIDEN, BERNIE SANDERS, 
KAMALA HARRIS, PETE BOURGET WERE
IN THE FRONT.
THEY WERE THE FRONT-RUNNERS 
COMING INTO TONIGHT.
THEY TALKED ABOUT RACE.
IMMIGRATION, POLICE VIOLENCE, 
HEALTH CARE, CLIMATE CHANGE, GUN
CONTROL, JUST TO NAME A FEW.
AND THOSE CANDIDATES TRIED TO 
STICK THEIR CLAIM ON THE ISSUES 
AND MANY OF THEM TRIED TO 
INTRODUCE THEMSELVES TO 
AMERICANS WHO ARE MEETING THEM 
FOR THE FIRST TIME TONIGHT.
HERE ARE SOME OF THE HIGHLIGHTS.
>> IT'S TIME FOR CHANGE, REAL 
CHANGE.
>> I WAS 6 YEARS OLD WHEN A 
PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE CAME TO 
THE CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC 
CONVENTION AND SAID, IT'S TIME 
TO PASS THE TORCH TO A NEW 
GENERATION OF AMERICANS.
THAT CANDIDATE WAS THEN SENATOR 
JOE BIDEN.

English: 
JOE BIDEN WAS RIGHT WHEN HE SAID
IT WAS TIME TO PA -- TO PASS THE
TORCH TO A NEW GENERATION OF 
AMERICANS, AND HE IS STILL RIGHT
TODAY.
>> AMERICA DOES NOT WANT TO 
WITNESS A FOOD FIGHT, THEY WANT 
TO KNOW HOW WE PUT FOOD ON THEIR
TABLE.
>> IF YOUR GOVERNMENT PLAN WOULD
PROVIDE FOR UNDOCUMENTED 
IMMIGRANTS?
>> LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE 
DON'T HAVE A HEALTH CARE SYSTEM 
IN THE UNITED STATES, WE HAVE A 
SICKNESS CARE SYSTEM IN THE 
UNITED STATES.
AND I WILL ENSURE THAT THE 
MICROPHONE THAT THE PRESIDENT OF
THE UNITED STATES HOLDS IN HER 
HAND IS USED IN A WAY THAT IS 
ABOUT RESPECTING THE VALUES OF 
OUR COUNTRY.
>> FOR A PARTY THAT 
ASSOCIATESIST WITH CHRISTIAN -- 
CHRISTIANITY, TO SAY THAT GOD 
WOULD SMILE ON THE DIVISION OF 
FAMILIES AT THE HANDS OF FEDERAL
AGENTS THAT GOD WOULD CONDON 

English: 
PUTTING KIDS IN CAGES. 
>> IF YOU FORCIBLY TAKE A CHILD 
FROM A PARENT'S ARMS YOU ARE 
KIDNAPPING THEM.
>> WITH THIS BORDER SECURITY, 
NOT A WALL, THE BORDER OF THE 
UNITED STATES HAS BEEN TURNED IN
TO A SYMBOL OF HOSTILITY.
WE NEED TO MAKE A CHANGE.
>> I'M DETERMINED TO BRING ABOUT
A DAY WHEN A WHITE PERSON 
DRIVING A VEHICLE AND A BLACK 
PERSON DRIVING A VEHICLE, WHEN 
THEY SEE A POLICE OFFICER 
APPROACHING, FEELS THE EXACT 
SAME THING. 
>> WE WILL GET TO YOU, HANG ON.
>> I WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THE 
ISSUE OF RACE.
AND I'M GOING THE NOW DIRECT 
THIS AT VICE PRESIDENT ABIDE 
KNOW.
UM, I -- I DO NOT BELIEVE YOU 
ARE A RACIST AND I BELIEVE YOU 
WHEN YOU COMMIT YOURSELF TO THE 
IMPORTANCE OF FINDING COMMON 

English: 
GROUND.
BUT I ALSO BELIEVE AND IT'S 
PERSONAL, AND IT WAS HURTFUL, TO
HEAR YOU TALK ABOUT THE 
REPUTATIONS OF TWO UNITED STATES
SENATORS WHO BUILT THEIR 
REPUTATIONS AND CAREER ON THE 
SEGRAGATION OF RACE IN THE 
COUNTRY.
>> I DID NOT PRAISE RACISTS.
>> DO YOU AGREE TODAY, DO YOU 
AGREE TODAY, THAT YOU WERE WRONG
TO OPPOSE BUSSING IN AMERICA 
THEN?
>> NO, I DID NOT OPPOSE BUSSING 
IN AMERICA.
WHAT I OPPOSED IS BUSSING 
ORDERED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF 
EDUCATION.
THAT IS WHAT I OPPOSED.
I DID NOT OPPOSE -- 
>> IT WAS A FAILURE OF STATES 
TO -- I WAS PART OF THE SECOND 
CLASS TO INTEGRATE BERKELEY, 
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS TWO 
DECADES OUT OF BROWN--V-BOARD OF
EDUCATION.
>> IT WAS A LOCAL DECISION.
>> THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT -- 
THAT'S WHY WE HAVE THE VOTING 
RIGHTS ACT AND THE CIVIL RIGHTS 

English: 
ACT.
THAT'S WHY WE NEED TO PASS THE 
EQUALITY ACT AND THE E.R.A, 
THERE'S MOMENTS IN HISTORY WHERE
STATES FAIL TO PRESERVE THE 
CIVIL RIGHTS OF OUR PEOPLE.
WHO DO YOU WANT WHEN THAT DOOR 
CLOSES TO BE SITTING BEHIND THE 
DESK?
TO FIGHT FOR WOMEN'S RIGHTS?
I HAVE BEEN THE FIERCEST 
ADVOCATE FOR WOMEN'S 
REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR OVER A 
DECADE.
>> IT WOULD SPEED US UP ON 
CLIMATE CHANGE, IF YOU GET YOUR 
BOOT OFF OF PEOPLE'S THROATS, WE
WILL HAVE CLIMATE CHANGE FOR 
QUICKLY.
>> IF MORE GUNS MADE US SAFER, 
WE WOULD BE THE SAFEST COUNTRY 
ON EARTH.
IT DOESN'T WORK THAT WAY.
>> HERE TO HELP ME DIVE IN TO 
ALL OF THOSE ISSUES WE HEARD 
TONIGHT ON THE DEBATE STAGE.
WE HAVE NANCY SANTIAGO, AND 
ZERLINA MAXWELL.

English: 
WHO DO YOU THINK WON THE DEBATE 
TONIGHT, ALEX?
>> IT WAS KAMALA HARRIS AND THAT
EXCHANGE SHE HAD WITH JOE BIDEN 
WAS SOMETHING THAT WE WILL BE 
DISCUSSED.
IT'S NOT EVEN OVER, KAMALA'S 
CAMPAIGN IS SAYING THAT BIDEN 
NEEDS TO APOLOGIZE.
AND THERE'S AN OPEN QUESTION, 
BIDEN IN THEIR DEFENDED HIS 
PASSED VIEWS.
THAT IS NOT CLEAR, THEY ARE 
GOING TO KEEP PUSHING HIM TO 
CHANGE HIS POSITION.
>> DO YOU THINK HE WAS RIGHT TO 
DOUBLE DOWN WHEN SHE HELD HIS 
FEET TO THE FIRE?
>> NO, HE WAS WRONG.
HE IS WRONG.
AND SHE ARTICULATED 
FUNDAMENTALLY A REALLY IMPORTANT
DEBATE IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY, 
WHICH IS THE ROLE OF THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT WHEN IT STEPS IN.
WHEN THE STATES ARE NOT DOING 
WHAT THE SUPREME COURT SAYS IT 

English: 
SHOULD DO, RIGHT?
SO, HER POINT ON THE SUBSTANCE 
IS CORRECT.
SO, HE WAS WRONG IN THAT MOMENT 
AND WRONG TO DOUBLE DOWN.
>> AND THEN YOU WERE THERE LAST 
NIGHT IN MIAMI CORRECT?
>> THAT'S RIGHT.
>> ONE THING I COULD NOT HELP 
BUT NOTICE WAS THE WAY THAT 
IDENTITY POLITICS WAS TREATED 
TONIGHT VERSE LAST NIGHT.
TO ME, AND TELL ME IF I'M WRONG,
IT FELT LIKE LAST NIGHT WAS MORE
ABOUT WHO I AM.
AND TONIGHT, IT WAS MORE OF WHAT
I HAVE SPECIALSED.
YOU SAW THE CANDIDATES CONNECT 
ON THINGS LIKE HEALTH CARE.
I HAD A SICK DAD OR A TERMINAL 
ILLNESS AND IT SEEMED TO BE 
ABOUT THE MARROW OF THEIR 
EXPERIENCES.
DO YOU THINK THAT AFFECTED WHY 
THAT MOMENT WITH KAMALA WAS SO 
POWERFUL?
>> I DON'T THINK IT WAS THAT PER
SAY FOR ME, THERE WAS IDENTITY 
POLITICS LAST NIGHT.
AND IT WAS AROUND THE 
IMMIGRATION PIECE.
IT'S NOT BLACK AND WHITE, RIGHT?
IT'S A VERY DIFFERENT THING.
SO IN THAT RESPECT, THAT WAS A 
HEATED EXCHANGE BETWEEN -- SO, 
WE THINK ABOUT THAT PIECE, IT'S 

English: 
JUST PLAYING OUT DIFFERENTLY.
WHAT I THINK THE PROBLEM, OR THE
MISSED OPPORTUNITY FOR BIDEN 
WAS, HE HAD A CHANCE TO MODEL 
FOR AMERICA HOW TO SAY, I AM 
SORRY, LET'S FIX THIS.
BECAUS -- BECAUSE SHE SAID, I 
WAS HURT PERSONALLY.
IT WAS HIS MOMENT TO SHOW HOW 
YOU COME TOGETHER, HE SAID IT, 
I'M THE BRIDGE.
DO THAT, AND THAT DIDN'T HAPPEN 
IN THE EXCHANGE.
>> I THINK SHE SPOKE TORE OTHER 
BLACK PEOPLE TOO.
SAYING IT WAS HURTFUL.
WE ARE JUST SAYING THAT YOU 
KNOW, YOUR WORDS HAD AN IMPACT 
IN A NEGATIVE WAY, BECAUSE IT 
SEEMED THAT YOU DID NOT 
UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU WERE SAY IN 
THE MOMENT.
YOU ARE COMPLIMENTING, NOT 
PRAISING, SPECIFICALLY TO BE 
CLEAR, BUT SAYING SOMETHING 
COMPLIMENTARY ABOUT 
SEGREGATIONIST, SEEMS LIKE 
SOMETHING YOU DO NOT SAY IF YOU 
WANT TO WIN THE NOMINATION.
>> WHAT I THINK WAS POWERFUL WAS
WHEN SHE SAID, I DO NOT THINK 
YOU ARE A RACIST.

English: 
FOR US IN THE FIELD, WE HEAR 
THAT WORD BEING THROWN AROUND, 
AND AUTOMATICALLY YOU ARE A 
RACIST IF YOU VOTED FOR TRUMP.
HEY, TO SAY PLAINLY, I THINK I 
BELIEVE I KNOW WHAT IS IN YOUR 
HEART, BUT THIS IS AN ISSUE 
ABOUT POLICY.
AND THAT IS WHY WE ARE ALL 
STANDING HERE ON THE DEBATE 
STAGE.
DO YOU THINK, HOWEVER, THAT SHE 
IS KEEPING THE ISSUE AROUND, YOU
SAID THE WORD PRAISE, PRAISING 
THE SEGREGATIONIST.
HE SAID THAT HE DID NOT DO.
>> HE SAID HE DID NOT DO THAT.
>> DO YOU THINK, SHE AND SENATOR
BOOKER ARE KEEPING THE ISSUE 
ALIVE FOR POLITICAL REASONS?
>> SURE, YEAH.
ALEX, YEAH, OKAY, OKAY.
>> YEAH.
YEAH, YEAH.
>> ONLY ONE OF THEM CAN BE 
PRESIDENT, IF YOU ARE GOING TO 
PROSECUTE THAT CASE.
DOESN'T MEAN THE FEELINGS ARE 
NOT SINCERE AND THAT SHE WAS NOT
OFFENDED OR HURT.
SHE IS GOING TO KEEP PUSHING 
THIS, BECAUSE SHE WANTS TO SHOW 
THAT SHE CAN PROSECUTE THE CASE 
AGAINST FRUMP -- AGAINST TRUMP 

English: 
AND THE FRONT-RUNNER.
>> LOOKING LIKE SOMEBODY THAT 
WANTS TO WIN THE ELECTION.
SHE DID NOT COME IN TO GO UP IN 
THE POLLS A BIT.
SHE CAME OUT WITH THE 
CONVICTION, IT WAS LIKE, IN THE 
EYES.
SHE HAD CONVICTION, SHE LOOKED 
DIRECTLY IN THE CAMERA AND SAID 
THINGS, YOU KNOW, WITH SUCH 
CONFIDENCE.
WHEN I'M PRESIDENT, WHEN I'M IN 
THE OVAL OFFICE.
SHE WILL HOLD THE MIC IN HER 
HAND.
IT'S SUBTLE.
BUT, YOU KNOW, I DON'T KNOW IF 
YOU FEEL THIS WAY AS WELL.
-- THE FIRST AFRICAN-AMERICAN 
WOMAN. 
>> RIGHT.
?
I HAVE NOT -- 
>> THAT WAS THE '90s.
>> AND I DID NOT WATCH THE 
DEBATE.
THIS IS THE FIRST TIME IN MY, 
YOU KNOW, ADULT LIFE I HAVE SEEN
A BLACK WOMAN -- 
>> SO SENATOR HARRIS IS THE 
FIRST AFRICAN-AMERICAN FEMALE 
SENATOR, BUT BACK IN THE '90s --
>> THERE WERE THREE BLACK WOMEN 
THAT EVER HAD RUN.
THIS IS THE FIRST TIME I HAVE 

English: 
SEEN A BLACK WOMAN ON THE STAGE 
AT THIS LEVEL.
THAT THEY ARE TAKING IT TO THE 
FRONT-RUNNER.
NOT JUST THE FRONT-RUNNER, TO 
THE FORMER VICE PRESIDENT.
SHE IS GOING TO WIN OVER A LOT 
OF FANS THAT, AGAIN, GOING BACK 
TO THE AP POLL THAT I CITED.
>> SO, NANCY, I HAVE TO GET YOU 
TO WEIGH IN ON THIS FOR ME.
WHY WAS THAT MOMENT WITH KAMALA 
READ SO DIFFERENTLY THEN THE 
MOMENT WITH BETHEL YESTERDAY, 
WHEN HE WAS SPEAKING TODAY?
>> IT'S ONE OF THOSE MOMENTS WE 
HAVE BEEN USING THE WORD 
APPROPRIATION QUITE A BIT.
IT WAS THAT MOMENT, OF COME ON, 
LET'S NOT DO THAT MOMENT. 
>> THIS IS BROADCAST ON 
TELEMUNDO -- HE WAS SPEAKING 
SPANISH TO A LATINO AUDIENCE. 

English: 
>> THAT WAS RUMOR THAT WE WERE 
SEEING AND JULIAN HAD NOTHING TO
LOSE AND BETO DRUG IT OUT OF 
HIM.
AND HERE ARE THE POLICIES THAT 
YOU ARE NOT ANSWERING TO, THAT 
YOU ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT HOW 
YOU ARE GOING TO CHANGE.
AND NO ONE TONIGHT MENTIONED 
1325.
>> ONLY WITH HIM YESTERDAY.
>> AND NOTHING HAPPENED TODAY.
>> AND 1325 FOR THE AUDIENCE IS 
ASYLUM. 
>> IT'S WHAT MAKES IT ILLEGAL TO
GET ACROSS A BORDER WITHOUT A 
DOCUMENT.
THIS IS THE STRUGGLE.
SO, THAT IS WHAT IS CAUSING IT 
AND MAKE NO MISTAKE ABOUT IT, 
NOBODY BROUGHT UP THE RAIDS THAT
ARE PENDING.
MY HOMETOWN IS ABOUT TO BE ONE 
OF THE LARGEST STAGING SITES AND
THEY ARE COMING.
NO ONE BROUGHT IT UP.
I THINK WHAT HAPPENED, SPEAKING 
SPANISH IS NICE.

English: 
DOING SOMETHING MATTERS.
AND THAT IS WHAT I THINK REALLY 
GOT IN HIS CRAW LAST NIGHT AND 
THAT'S WHAT WE SAW.
THERE WAS A FIRE IN THE BELLY 
THAT I HAD NEVER SEEN, THAT I 
WAS EXCITED TO SEE.
AND WHEN YOU SEE EVERYONE 
GOOGLING HAD HIM, WHERE DID YOU 
COME FROM?
I THINK WE WILL HAVE THE SAME 
REACTION SENATOR HARRIS, IT WAS 
A DIFFERENT SENATOR THAT WAS ON 
STAGE. 
>> THE GOOGLE SEARCH FOR KAMALA 
HARRIS INCREASED BY 500% AND SHE
WAS THE TOP SEARCH OF ALL OF THE
CANDIDATES.
WE WERE TALKING ABOUT IT IN 
PREDEBATE SHOW, SENATOR SANDERS.
DID HE HURT OR HELP HIS LEAD 
TONIGHT?
>> HE CLEARLY CAME IN NOT 
WANTING TO ENGAGE BIDEN.
THERE WAS SPECULATION THAT HE 
WAS GOING TO TAKE ON BIDEN AND 
ON ONE OF THE SIGNATURE ISSUES A
LAY-UP FOR BERNIE ABOUT THE IRAQ

English: 
WAR VOTE, WHERE BERNIE OF WAS IN
THE CONGRESS AND VOTED THE 
OPPOSITE WAY, THEY NOTED IT, 
DISAGREED AND MOVED ON.
HE DID NOT WANT TO GET IN A 
BOXING MATCH WITH BIDEN.
>> WAS HE SCARED?
>> WE WOULD HAVE TO ASK HIM.
I THINK HE CAME IN TO TALK ABOUT
HIS ISSUES AND NOT TRY TO GET IN
A SLUGGING MATCH WITH BIDEN.
>> SPEAKING OF ASKING THE 
CANDIDAT
CANDIDATES.
I WANT TO DO THAT JUST NOW.
WITH VONN HILLIARD, HE IS THERE 
HAD IN THE SPIN ROOM, WHO HAVE 
YOU BEEN A I BELIEVE TO TALK TO 
TONIGHT?
I SEE THE CAMERAS MOVING.
THERE HE IS.
HE IS PULLING -- OKAY -- 
>> THERE'S TWO SENATORS RIGHT 
THERE ON THE STAGE.
SENATOR BERNIE SANDERS AND 
KAMALA HARRIS AND THEY RAISED 
THEIR HANDS AND TALKED ABOUT 
ELIMINATING PRIVATE HEALTH 
INSURANCE, FROM YOUR EXPERIENCE 
IN THE SENATE AND WORKING ON 
LEGISLATION, WHAT IS IT THAT 
THEY ARE MISSING IN THE 
EQUATION?
>> FIRST OF ALL, THEY WERE 
HONEST ABOUT WHAT WAS IN THE 
BILL, THAT IS GOOD, THERE'S 

English: 
PEOPLE THAT SAY, IT DOES NOT 
ELIMINATE PRIVATE INSURANCE.
IT SOMEHOW IS LIKE AUSTRALIA.
WHERE IT'S A GOOD SYSTEM.
WHERE YOU HAVE PUBLIC AND 
PRIVATE INSURANCE.
THAT IS POINT ONE.
BUT GOOD FOR HONESTY AND WHAT 
THEY ARE MISSING, THERE'S A LOT 
OF PEOPLE, AS BERNIE SAID 
TONIGHT, THERE'S A LOT OF PEOPLE
THAT HATE PRIVATE INSURANCE.
THAT IS TRUE.
I HEAR FROM A LOT OF PEOPLE LIKE
THAT.
AND THERE'S A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT
LIKE THE INSURANCE THAT THEY 
HAVE AND WANT TO KEEP IT AND I 
THINK, IF THE OBJECTIVE IS TO 
GET TO UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE 
COVERAGE AS QUICKLY AS WE CAN, 
GIVING PEOPLE AN OPTION TO 
CHOOSE FOR THEIR FAMILY, I THINK
IS ABSOLUTELY GOING TO BE THE 
FASTEST WAY.
I THINK WE WILL BE DEAD BEFORE 
WE TAKE IT AWAY FROM PEOPLE THAT
ARE HOLDING IT AT HOME OR WITH 
THEIR FAMILY.
>> THERE'S A SURPRISE FROM 
SENATOR HARRIS RAISING HER HAND 
FOR THE RESPONSE AND I THINK 
THERE'S A CONCERN, WHAT IMPACT 
DOES IT HAVE?
>> I WAS NOT SURPRISED.

English: 
I THINK SHE IS FOR IT AND SHE 
SAID THAT SHE WANTS IT.
IN STATES LIKE COLORADO, AND 
OTHER STATES, WHERE, THAT WE 
NEED TO WIN THE MAJORITY IN THE 
SENATE, WE ARE GOING TO HAVE A 
HARD TIME IF THE POSITION IS 
THAT WE ARE GOING TO TAKE 
INSURANCE AWAY FROM 180MILLION 
PEOPLE.
REMEMBER WHAT HAPPENED AFTER THE
AFFORDABLE CARE ACT.
PRESIDENT OBAMA SAID IF YOU LIKE
YOUR INSURANCE, YOU CAN KEEP IT.
A RELATIVELY SMALL NUMBER OF 
PEOPLE LOST IT BECAUSE OF THE 
WAY THAT THE SYSTEM CAME IN TO 
PLACE.
AND THAT WAS A POLITICAL 
DISASTER.
AND IT CONTINUES TO BE ONE 
TODAY.
SO, IMAGINE A SITUATION WHERE, 
WHAT WE ARE SAYING TO PEOPLE IS,
IF YOU LIKE YOUR INSURANCE, WE 
ARE GOING TO TAKE IT AWAY FROM 
YOU.
THAT DOESN'T SEEM TO BE WHAT WE 
SHOULD BE ARGUING.
WHAT WE SHOULD BE ARGUING IS FOR
UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE COVERAGE.
AND WE CAN ACHIEVE THAT THROUGH 
A PUBLIC OPTION AND I THINK WE 
CAN WITH ACHIEVE IT QUICKLY.
AND WITH MUCH LESS DISRUPTION, 
AND BY THE WAY, EVERYBODY WHO 
HAS PRIVATE INSURANCE AND WHO 

English: 
HATES IT NO LONGER NEEDS IT, 
THEY CAN COME ON TO MEDICARE-X. 
>> THE CONVERSATION ABOUT 
PASSING THE TORCH TO THE NEXT 
GENERATION.
DO YOU BELIEVE THAT TWO MEN IN 
THE MIDDLE OF THAT STAGE SHOULD 
PASS THE TORCH?
>> I THINK IT'S TIME, I ANSWERED
BERNIE'S QUESTION HE ASKED AT 
THE END, 40 YEARS OF IMMOBILITY 
IN THE COUNTRY AND WE HAVE NOT 
FIGURED OUT HOW TO ADDRESS IT 
AND IT'S TIME TO CHANGE THAT.
I AGREE WITH THAT.
THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME.
>> GOOD TO SEE YOU.
>> DID SENATOR BENNETT CONSIDER 
HIMSELF PART OF THE NEW 
GENERATION OF LEADERSHIP?
OKAY.
I THINK WE LOST HIM TO THE SPIN 
ROOM, WHICH IS WHERE HE OUGHT TO
BE, GETTING MORE ANSWERS FROM 
THE CANDIDATES.
AND THANK YOU FOR WATCHING STAY 
TUNED WE ARE JUST GOING TO TAKE 
A VERY SHORT BREAK, WE WILL BE 
RIGHT HERE WITH SPECIAL COVERAGE
OF THE FIRST PRESIDENT AAL 

English: 
DEBATE ON NBC NEWS NOW.
STAY TUNED.

English: 
♪ ♪
>>> THANKS FOR JOINING US HERE 
ON NBC NEWS NOW AND ONE OF THE 
BIG ISSUES THAT THE CANDIDATES 
HIT EARLY WAS THEIR PLANS FOR 
HEALTH CARE.
WE ALSO HERD A LOT ABOUT THAT, 
FROM CANDIDATE SWALWELL WHO IS 
TALKING TO VONN.
LET US KNOW WHAT SWALWELL SAID, 
HE IS STANDING BEHIND YOU.
I WANT TO ASK ABOUT THE QUESTION
HE PLACED TO JOE BIDEN ABOUT 
TORCH BEARERS.
CAN WE ASK ABOUT THAT?
>> YEAH, CONGRESSMAN SWALWELL, 
THE QUESTION OFF THE BAT WAS THE
IDEA OF PASSING THE TORCH.
WHY COME OFF WITH THAT QUESTION?
>> THERE'S A URGENCY TO THE 
ISSUES OF THIS GENERATION.
STUDENT DEBT, I HAVE IT AND 40 
MILLION PEOPLE HAVE IT.
WE NEED SOMEBODY THAT WILL DO IT
NOW.
GUN VIOLENCE, SEND MY KIDS TO 
SCHOOL, WORRY ABOUT THEIR 
SAFETY.
WE CANNOT WAIT FOR PEOPLE TO 

English: 
EVOLVE TO THE ISSUES.
WE NEED SOMEONE THAT UNDERSTANDS
THE URGENCY, WE NEED TO INVEST 
IN A CLIMATE CHANGE DEAL.
JOE BIDEN OF WAS RIGHT.
I'M STANDING ON THE STAGE AS 
SOMEBODY WHO IS READY TO RECEIVE
THE TORCH.
>> DID YOU MAKE THE ARGUMENT A 
THAT SANDERS AND BIDEN HAD THE 
HISTORY TO LEND CREDIBILITY AT 
THIS MOMENT IN TIME TO WHAT 
POLICIES SHOULD BE PRESSED 
FORWARD?
>> I HAPPEN TO THINK THAT THE 
ISSUES ARE SO URGENT A THAT WE 
CANNOT COUNT ON PEOPLE WHO HAVE 
BEEN AROUND FOR DOZENS OF 
DECADES AS THESE PROBLEMS HAVE 
BEEN AROUND.
WE NEED NEW EYES ON THE PROBLEM 
SET AND NEW ENERGY TO SOLVE THEM
AND I'M READY TO DO THAT.
>> THE QUESTION IS, THERE'S 20 
PEOPLE ON THE STAGE, YOU ARE NOT
THE ONLY ONE IN YOUR GENERATION,
IF I MAY, WHY YOU AMONG THE 
GENERATION THAT INCLUDES SENATOR
KAMALA HARRIS AND MAYOR 
BUTTIGIEG. 
>> I AM DAY ONE READY.

English: 
I SHAPED WASHINGTON MORE THAN IT
SHAPED ME, I HAVE PUT EFFORT IN 
TO BRINGING MORE YOUNGER 
CONGRESSMAN, I'M ONE OF THE 
THREE PEOPLE IN THE HOUSE THAT 
HAVE THE ACCESS TO THE M-- 
>> THE TORCH BEARERS HAVE NOT 
EARNED THE TRUST OF THE PEOPLE 
YET.
WHY DOES HE THINK THAT THE 
YOUNGER GENERATION AND THE 
AMERICAN ELECTORATE SHOULD TRUST
HIM AS THE TORCH BEARER?
>> THERE'S FOLKS THAT HAVE 
SUGGESTED THAT THIS YOUNGER 
GENERATION HAS NOT EARNED THE 
TRUST YET TO HAVE THAT TORCH BE 
PASSED, ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY ARE
IN THE ROLES THEY ARE AND DO NOT
HAVE MUCH CREDIBILITY TO THEIR 
NAMES?
>> I WENT TO CONGRESS AT 31 
YEARS OLD AND SAW A LOT OF 
MILLIONAIRES AND PEOPLE 
DISCONNECTED.

English: 
I WENT RIGHT TO WORK.
I AM ON THE HOUSE INTELLIGENCE 
COMMITTEE.
I HAVE GONE TO THE WAR ZONE.
I HAVE SPOKEN WITH LEADERS.
I'M READY TAKE ONE. 
>> WHY NOT SENATOR HARRIS?
>> I'M A BIG FAN OF SENATOR 
HARRIS, I THINK WE BRING 
DIFFERENT EXPERIENCES.
FOR ME, I BRING WORKING CLASS 
BACKGROUNDS, BORN IN IOWA.
EDUCATED IN THE SOUTH.
MARRIED TO A HOOSIER.
ELECTED IN A DIVERSE PART OF 
CALIFORNIA.
I KNOW THIS COUNTRY AND I CAN 
REPRESENT IT AND BEAT DONALD 
TRUMP.
>> THANK YOU.
MORGAN?
>> CONGRESSMAN SWALWELL, THANK 
YOU SO MUCH, AND PLEASE, STAY IN
THE SPIN ROOM, WE WOULD LOVE TO 
COME BACK TO YOU LATER.
AND AS YOU JUST HEARD FROM 
CONGRESSMAN SWALWELL, ONE OF THE
BIG ISSUES THAT THE CANDIDATES 
HIT EARLY WAS THEIR PLANS FOR 
HEALTH CARE.
FROM OBAMA CARE TO HEALTH CARE 
FOR ALL.
COVERING UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS
AND DOING AWAY WITH PRIVATE 
HEALTH PLANS.
EVERYTHING WAS ON THE TABLE 
TONIGHT.
AND THE CANDIDATES GOT RIGHT IN 

English: 
TO IT, TAKE A LOOK.
>> WHO HERE WOULD GET RID OF 
THEIR PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE 
IN FAVOR OF GOVERNMENT RUN PLAN.
>> WHEN MY WIFE AND DAUGHTER 
WERE KILLED IN AN AUTOMOBILE 
ACCIDENT.
I CANNOT IMAGINE WHAT IT WOULD 
BE LIKE TO NOT HAVE ADEQUATE 
HEALTH CARE AVAILABLE.
WHEN MY SON CAME HOME FROM IRAQ 
AND DIAGNOSED WITH CANCER AND 
GIVEN MONTHS TO LIVE, I CANNOT 
THINK OF WHAT HAPPENED, WHEN 
THEY SAID, THE LAST SIX MONTHS 
OF YOUR LIFE, YOU ARE ON YOUR 
OWN, YOU HAVE USED UP YOUR TIME.
THE FACT OF THE MATTER IS, THE 
QUICKEST, FASTEST WAY TO DO IT 
IS BUILD TO OBAMA CARE.
WE WILL HAVE MEDICARE FOR ALL!
>> WHEN 10s OF MILLIONS PEOPLE 
ARE PREPARED TO STAND UP AND 
TELL THE INSURANCE COMPANIES AND
THE DRUG COMPANIES THAT THEIR 
DAY IS GONE, THAT HEALTH CARE IS
A HUMAN RIGHT, NOT SOMETHING TO 

English: 
MAKE HUGE PROFIT OFF OF.
>> THIS WAS PERSONAL FOR ME.
.
I STARTED OUT THIS YEAR DEALING 
WITH A TERMINAL ILLNESS WITH 
WITH MY FATHER.
THE THING WE HAD GOING FOR US, 
WE NEVER HAD TO MAKE THE 
DECISIONS BASED ON WHETHER IT 
WAS GOING TO BANKRUPT OUR FAMILY
BECAUSE OF MEDICARE.
AND I WANT EVERY FAMILY TO HAVE 
THAT SAME FREEDOM TO DO WHAT IS 
MEDICALLY RIGHT .
>> LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE 
DON'T HAVE A HEALTH CARE SYSTEM 
IN THE UNITED STATES, WE HAVE A 
SICKNESS CARE SYSTEM IN THE 
UNITED STATES.
>> RAISE YOUR HAND IF YOUR 
GOVERNMENT PLAN WOULD PROVIDE 
COVERAGE FOR UNDOCUMENTED 
IMMIGRANTS.
OKAY.
>> CANNOT LET PEOPLE WHO ARE 
SICK, NO MATTER WHERE THEY ARE 
FROM OR THEIR STATUS GO 
UNCOVERED.
YOU CAN'T DO THAT.
IT'S GOT TO BE TAKEN CARE OF, 
PERIOD, YOU HAVE TO.
IT'S THE HUMANE THING TO DO.
BUT HERE'S THE DEAL, THEY 
CONTRIBUTE TO THE WELL-BEING OF 
THE COUNTRY.
THEY INCREASE THE LIFE SPAN OF 
SOCIAL SECURITY BECAUSE THEY 
HAVE A JOB, THEY ARE PAYING IN 
TO SOCIAL SECURITY TAX.
THAT'S WHAT THEY ARE DOING.
IT'S INCREASED THE LIFE SPAN.

English: 
THEY WOULD DO THE SAME THING IN 
TERMS OF REVIEWSING THE OVERALL 
COST OF HEALTH CARE BY THEM 
BEING TREATED AND NOT WAIT UNTIL
THEY ARE IN AN EMERGENCY. 
>> THE WAY TO BEAT PRESIDENT 
TRUMP, AND McCONNELL WALKS IN, 
WHO DO YOU WANT WHEN THE DOOR IS
CLOSING, TO FIGHT FOR WOMEN'S 
RIGHTS?
I HAVE BEEN THE FIERCE ESTIMATE 
ADVOCATE FOR WOMEN'S 
REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR OVER A 
DECADE, WHEN THAT DOOR CLOSES I 
WILL GUARANTEE WOMEN'S 
REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS NO MATTER 
WHAT.
>> THANK YOU.
>> THANK YOU.
>> AS YOU SAW, THE GLOVES WERE 
OFF TONIGHT, HOW MANY OF THOSE 
CLAIMS WERE TRUE?
WE ARE IN MIAMI RIGHT NOW, WHERE
WE HAVE BEEN FACT CHECKING THE 
CANDIDATES.
WHAT CAUGHT YOUR EYE TONIGHT?
>> HEY, MORGAN.
TONIGHT WAS DEFINITELY A MUCH 
DICEYER NIGHT, A LOT OF 
DIFFERENT FACTS, SOME OF THEM 
RIGHT AND SOME NOT RIGHT.
ONE OF THE FIRST ONES THAT 
JUMPED OUT, KAMALA HARRIS SAYING
THAT THE ECONOMY IS NOT WORKING 

English: 
FOR SOME PEOPLE BECAUSE PEOPLE 
ARE WORKING MULTIPLE JOBS.
THIS IS SOMETHING YOU HEAR A LOT
FROM THE LEFT BECAUSE THE 
ECONOMY LOOKS PRETTITY GOOD AND 
IT'S ONE OF TRUMP'S BIGGEST 
CLAIMS FOR RE-ELECTION.
BUT THE BUREAU OF LABOR 
STATISTICS TRACKED HOW MANY 
PEOPLE WORK MULTIPLE JOBS, 5% OF
AMERICA.
THAT IS 8 MILLION PEOPLE, SO A 
LOT OF PEOPLE, YOU CAN SAY 
THERE'S A LOT OF PEOPLE DOING 
IT, BUT IT DOWN SLIGHTLY FROM 20
YEARS AGO.
A COUPLE OF THEY ARE THINGS, 
MARE PETE BUTTIGIEG TALKING 
ABOUT THE PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP
AND THE VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE 
SUPPORT THAT.
A KIND OF PATHWAY TO 
CITIZENSHIP.
IT'S TRUE.
THE GALLUP POLL SAID 80% OF 
AMERICANS FEEL THAT WAY.
AND MEDICARE FOR ALL DOESN'T GET
RID OF ALL PRIVATE INSURANCE, IT
DOES FOR EVERYTHING BUT COSMETIC
CARE.
WHICH IS WHAT PEOPLE DO NOT 
THINK OF FOR INSURANCE PURPOSE 
AND THE BIG ONE IS BIDEN AND 
BUSSING.

English: 
SO KAMALA HARRIS WENT AFTER HIM,
FOR THE TOPIC FROM YEARS AGO.
SHE IS CAREFUL WHEN WHAT THEY 
SAID, THAT HE WORKED WITH AVOWED
SEGREGATIONISTS TO OPPOSE 
BUSSING.
AND IT'S ONE OF THE THINGS THAT 
IS HITTING HIM HARD AS HE TRIES 
TO SAY, HE CAN TAKE THE BANNER 
FOR HIS PARTY.
BUT IF PEOPLE IN HIS PARTY SAY 
MAYBE HE IS NOT WHERE THE 
MAINSTREAM OF THE PARTY IS NOW.
>> THAT WAS INTERESTING, THAT 
WAS THE MOMENT FOR EVERY 
PANELIST, THAT CAUGHT THEIR EYE,
THE QUESTION ON BUSSING AND THE 
FACT THAT SENATOR HARRIS DID 
HOLD HAD HIS FEET TO THE FIRE.
SO, WE DEFINITELY APPRECIATE YOU
CLEARING THAT UP FOR US.
>>> RIGHT NOW, WE WILL TAKE A 
QUICK BREAK, WE HOPE YOU STAY 
WITH US FOR SPECIAL COVERAGE OF 
THE FIRST PRESIDENTIAL 

English: 
DEMOCRATIC DEBATE, RIGHT HERE ON
NBC NEWS NOW.
>>> WELCOME BACK TO NBC NEWS 

English: 
NOW, LET'S GO STRAIGHT WHERE WE 
ARE WATCHING THE DEBATE WITH THE
COLLEGE STUDENTS.
WHO DO THE STUDENTS THINK 
CAPTURED THEIR ATTENTION?
>> OH, MAN, IT WAS A LIVELY ROOM
IN HERE TONIGHT.
A LOT OF HOT PICKS.
AND I WILL ASK FOR THEM NOW.
YOU HAD A LOT TO SAY WHEN WE 
WERE WATCHING AND I WANT THE TOP
LINE REACTIONS RIGHT NOW.
WHAT STOOD OUT AND WHAT WAS THE 
TAKE ON THE DEBATE OVERALL, 
COMPARED TO LAST NIGHT?
>> I THINK VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN 
AND SENATOR -- BUCKLED UNDER THE
PRESSURE.
WHEN THE HEAT WAS TURNED UP, 
THEY COULD NOT HOLD THEIR OWN.
THAT WAS BIG, AND FOR SOMEBODY 
LIKE VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN, HE 
IS, YOU KNOW, KAMALA HARRIS WAS 
TOUGH ON HIM TONIGHT.
THE PRESIDENT WILL BE TOUGH ON 
HIM IN A GENERAL ELECTION.
WILL HE HANDLE THAT?
>> SPEAKING OF KAMALA HARRIS.
I FELT THAT EVEN THOUGH TONIGHT 
A LOT OF THE CANDIDATES WERE 
ABLE TO COME AT JOE BIDEN FOR 

English: 
HIS CONTROVERSIAL PAST, I THINK 
THAT KAMALA BENEFITTED FROM 
PEOPLE NOT PICKING UP ON HER 
PAST AS SHE TALKED ABOUT HER 
ROLE IN REGARDS TO PRISON REFORM
AND IMMIGRATION.
I FEEL LIKE OTHER CANDIDATES 
SHOULD HAVE HELD HER FEET TO THE
FIRE AS THEY HELD JOE BIDEN TO 
THAT STANDARD AS WELL.
THAT SHOULD BE INTERESTING TO 
SEE WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN IN 
THE FUTURE.
HOWEVER, I DO FEEL THAT SHE WAS 
ABLE TO MAKE A VERY STRONG 
QUOTES THAT ARE GOING TO BE 
HEADLINERS AND FROM THAT, PEOPLE
ARE GOING TO BE UNDER THE 
IMPRESSION THAT SHE QUOTE 
UNQUOTE WON THE DEBATE.
I, HOWEVER DON'T THINK SO.
>> YOU DON'T THINK PEOPLE 
CHECKED HER ENOUGH.
BUT THE FACT THAT THAT DID NOT 
HAPPEN AND SHE WAS ABLE TO HOLD 
JOE BIDEN'S FEET TO THE FIRE AND
NOBODY CAME BACK AT HER, WHAT 
DOES THAT SAY ABOUT HER 
PERFORMANCE?
>> DEFINITELY VERY WORRYSOME, IN
THAT REGARD, AND ESPECIALLY, I'M
GOING TO KEEP GOING BACK TO HER 
STATEMENTS ABOUT PRISON REFORM.
SHE HAS A CONTROVERSIAL PAST 
ABOUT THAT AND THE FACT THAT 
NOBODY WAS ABLE TO BRING IT UP, 
AND SHE WAS ABLE TO KIND OF 
PAINT THE NARRATIVE OF 

English: 
INDIVIDUAL THAT HAS ALWAYS BEEN 
FIGHTING FOR THESE RIGHTS IS 
SOMEWHAT A PROBLEM TO ME.
>> DID SHE RESONATE WITH YOU 
Y
GUYS TONIGHT?
>> IT WAS IMPRESSIVE WHAT SHE 
HAD TO SAY.
AND THE CURRENT POSITIONS AND 
THINGS SHE SAID RESONATED WITH 
ME.
BUT I DEFINITELY FEEL LIKE WHAT 
SHE BROUGHT ON OUT OF JOE BIDEN 
WAS LIKE -- WAS A LOT OF 
DISAPPOINTMENT THAT I FELT THAT 
HE DOUBLED DOWN ON THE PAST 
POSITION.
SHE WAS ABLE TO BRING OUT THE 
NASTY RACIAL TENSIONS THERE.
AND THE FACT THAT HE STILL IS 
KIND OF HOLDING SOME OF THOSE 
OLD VIEWS TODAY.
SO -- 
>> YEAH, I MEAN, YOU GUYS WHEN I
ASKED YOU ABOUT JOE BIDEN BEFORE
THE DEBATE.
I ASKED WHO WAS EXCITED, NOBODY 
RAISED THEIR HANDS.
WHAT DID HIS PERFORMANCE TONIGHT
DO TO CHANGE YOUR OPINION OF 
HIM?
>> HE IS HE WAS A DISTRACTION, I
FEEL LIKE THE ENTIRE DEBATE, 
BECAUSE A LOT OF THE CANDIDATES 
WERE USING THEIR TIME TO ATTACK 

English: 
HIM AND GOAD HIM AND HE SPENT 
THE TIME DEFENDING HIMSELF, 
SAYING THIS IS WHAT I DID, THIS 
IS WHAT I DID.
AND HE RARELY TALKED ABOUT WHAT 
HE PLANNED TO DO.
THERE WAS NOT A LOT OF SUBSTANCE
TO THAT.
I WAS MORE INTERESTED IN THE 
CANDIDATES LIKE PETE BUTTIGIEG 
AND ANDREW YANG, THEY WERE MORE 
FOCUSED ON WHAT THEY WERE 
PLANNING TO DO.
THEY DID NOT GET AS MANY 
OPPORTUNITIES TO SPEAK AS THE 
HEADLINERS THEY USED THEIR TIME 
TO EXPLAIN WHAT THEY PLANNED TO 
DO.
>> RIGHT, WE TALKED ABOUT HOW 
YOU GUYS ARE INTERESTED IN 
HEARING SUBSTANCE AND POLICY, 
YOU TALKED ABOUT WANTING MORE 
CIVIL DISCOURSE, TRYING TO 
ELEVATE THE RHETORIC.
HOW DID THE CANDIDATES DO WITH 
THAT TONIGHT?
AND COMPARE IT TO LAST NIGHT?
>> I FELT THAT THE MOST 
DISAPPOINTING THING ABOUT THE 
NIGHT, WE DID GET TO SEE THEIR 
PERSONALITIES BUT NOT THEIR 
POLICIES AND HOW THEY 
DISTINGUISH THEMSELVES THROUGH 
THE POLICY.
THAT IS NOT WHAT WE GOT TO SEE.
AND I THINK THAT WAS SOMETHING 
THAT I DID NOT KNOW WHAT THEIR 
PLAN IS TO BE AND HOW THEY SET 
THEMSELVES APART FROM EACH 
OTHER.

English: 
>> I THINK IT'S CLEAR WHAT THEY 
ARE AGAINST.
THEY ARE AGAINST TRUMP, THEY ARE
AGAINST WALL STREET.
WHAT I LIKED ABOUT KAMALA HARRIS
AND PETE BUTTIGIEG, THEY WERE 
FOR SOMETHING.
KAMALA HARRIS WANTED TO GIVE A 
CREDIT TO PEOPLE MAKING UNDER 
$100,000 A YEAR.
THAT WAS IMPRESSIVE.
IT MADE HER A STAND OUT AS 
WORKING FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS.
THAT'S WHAT I WANTED TO SEE.
>> DID YOU GET CLARITY FROM 
TONIGHT OR BOTH NIGHTS IN TERMS 
OF WHO WILL GET YOUR SUPPORT AND
ABLE TO LAST IN THE RACE?
>> I THINK IT'S FUNNY HOW 
TONIGHT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE THE 
NIGHT WHERE INDIVIDUALS WERE 
MORE EXCITED BECAUSE OF THE BIG 
NAME CANDIDATES THAT WERE 
GATHERED TOGETHER.
UNFORTUNATELY, I PERSONALLY 
BELIEVE THAT YESTERDAY'S DEBATE 
WAS A LOT MORE BASED ON ACTUAL 
POLICY THAT THE CANDIDATES 
WANTED TO FOCUS ON.
ESPECIALLY THE CONVERSATIONS 
THAT WE WERE ALL HAVING BEFORE.

English: 
AND ESPECIALLY WHAT SHE SAID, 
UNFORTUNATELY TONIGHT IT WAS ALL
ABOUT TRUMP.
TRUMP, TRUMP, TRUMP.
AND AGAIN, IT'S LIKE, YES.
WE ARE ALREADY KNOW WHAT TRUMP 
IS, WHAT HE STANDS FOR.
WE GET IT, WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO
DO AS AN INDIVIDUAL TO -- 
INDIVIDUAL TO HELP US.
WE ARE NOT GOING TO JUST ACCEPT 
WHAT YOU SAY TO US.
IF YOU GET IN OFFICE, WE WANT 
YOU TO STAND BY.
>> NIGHT ONE, ACTUALLY, SEEMS 
LIKE IT WON WITH YOU GUYS.
THAT, THAT TOOK THE CAKE.
SO, WHO WON FROM BOTH NIGHTS?
LET'S START WITH YOU.
>> NO ONE.
>> TONIGHT, NO ONE WON.
YESTERDAY WAS -- 
>> I THINK -- WON FOR BOTH 
NIGHTS.
HIS PERSONALITY AND POLICIES.
>> KAMALA HARRIS TONIGHT, BUT I 
WOULD SAY OVERALL PROBABLY -- 
PREVAILED. 
>> I THINK SECRETARY -- 
>> I THOUGHT CASTRO DID STAND 
OUT DURING THE LAST DEBATE, I 

English: 
THOUGHT ELIZABETH WARREN DID A 
PRETTY GOOD JOB.
>> WHICH ONE BETWEEN BOTH 
NIGHTS?
>> I LIKED CASTRO, BECAUSE I WAS
NOT EXPECTING ANYTHING OUT OF 
HIM AND HE STOOD OUT DURING THE 
DEBATE.
AND PETE BUTTIGIEG DID A GOOD 
JOB.
AND ANDREW YANG DID A GOOD JOB.
>> I THINK KAMALA HARRIS DID 
WELL IN BOTH NIGHTS OF THE 
DEBATE.
I LIKE THAT SHE STOOD FOR 
SOMETHING CLEARLY AND I LIKE 
THAT SHE WAS A STRONG SPEAKER.
SHE ASSERTED HERSELFER AND THAT 
IS SOMETHING THAT I WANT TO SEE 
IN A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE.
ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY TAKE ON 
TRUMP.
>> WOW.
SO, STILL A PRETTY HEAVY VOTE 
FOR CASTRO.
BUT KAMALA GOT THE SPOTLIGHT 
TONIGHT.
SO, THREW HAVE IT.
THE DEBATE IS DONE AND WE WILL 
SEE HOW THE REST GO.
THANK YOU SO MUCH AND THANK YOU 
AGAIN FOR YOUR PANEL OF 
STUDENTS.
>> SOMETHING THAT JOY REALLY 
STRUCK ME.
I WANT TO BRING IN OUR GUEST 
AGAIN.

English: 
JOY, WAS A YOUNG WOMAN IN THE 
FRONT THAT SAID, KAMALA DID NOT 
ACTUALLY WIN BECAUSE KAMALA DID 
NOT GET A DOSE OF HER OWN 
MEDICINE.
NO ONE DID THAT TO HER ON OUR 
PROSECUTION RECORD IN CRIMINAL 
JUSTICE.
IS THAT TRUE OR FALSE?
DID SHE WIN BECAUSE SHE DID NOT 
TAKE THE HEAT HERSELF?
>> THAT MAY BE TRUE.
I THOUGHT SHE STOLE THE SHOW.
I THINK SHE CAME OFF ASSERTIVE.
CONFIDENT, SHE ANSWERED EVERY 
QUESTION WITH A, YOU KNOW, A 
DIRECT WAY.
I THINK THEY CAME OUT ON TOP.
I WALKED AWAY PERSONALLY HAVING 
A BETTER IDEA WHERE SHE STOOD ON
ISSUES.
>> WHAT ABOUT, JACKIE, HER 
CRIMINAL JUSTICE RECORD.
>> SHE HAS RECEIVED A LOT OF 
SCRUTINY FOR NOT BEING 
PROGRESSIVE ENOUGH.
SHE WAS ABLE TO EXPLOIT A FEW 
OPPORTUNITIES IN ORDER TO TOUT 
HER RECORD AS ATTORNEY GENERAL 

English: 
WHEN SHE CALLED OUT BIDEN ON THE
OBAMA ADMINISTRATION'S TRACK 
RECORD WITH INTRODUCING -- WHICH
WAS ONE POLICY OF HER FORMER 
PRESIDENT THAT SHE WAS NOT IN 
FAVOR OF.
BUT, THAT WAS THE BENEFIT OF 
PREPARATION.
I MEAN, SHE, WHEN HAD YOU ARE ON
THE OFFENSIVE, YOU DO NOT HAVE 
TO ANSWER FOR THE THINGS THAT 
PEOPLE ARE NOT ATTACKING YOU 
FOR.
AND IT WAS CLEAR, THAT THIS WAS 
SOMETHING, ATTACKING BIDEN ON 
THE OPPOSITION, WAS SOMETHING 
THAT SHE HAD TEE'ED UP AND SHE 
WENT FOR IT AND DID NOT LET UP 
ON BIDEN.
THAT WAS A DEFINING MOMENT OF 
THE WEEK.
THAT WILL BE THE DEFINING MOMENT
OF THE ELECTION SO FAR. 
>> AND SHE MADE IT PERSONAL.
>> SHE DID.
>> AND WHAT ABOUT BUTTIGIEG, 
NANCY, WHEN HE WAS ASKED ABOUT 
WHY THE POLICE FORCE BACK IN 
SOUTH BEND WAS NOT DIVERSE, HE 
SAID PLAINLY, I COULD NOT GET IT
DONE.
WAS THAT REFRESHINGLY HONEST?
OR WAS THAT ENOUGH?
>> IT WAS HONEST, BUT IT WAS NOT
ENOUGH.

English: 
HE FELL SHORT.
I MEAN, YOU GAVE ME IN ALL OF 
THE REASONS WHY IT DID NOT GET 
DONE FT.
BUT YOU DID NOT GIVE ME, WHAT 
WILL YOU DO DIFFERENTLY?
RIGHT?
YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE TO BREAK 
THIS OPEN.
YOU CANNOT WALK IN TO THIS NEXT 
STAGE OF OUR PRESIDENCY, WITHOUT
BEING ABLE TO ANSWER THAT 
QUESTION IN A VERY CONCRETE A 
WAY.
WHAT IS YOUR PLAN TO DO IT 
DIFFERENTLY?
I DID NOT HEAR THAT AT ALL.
>> JACKIE, WHAT DID YOU THINK 
WHEN CONGRESSMAN SWALWELL LOOKED
AT HIM ANDSAID, WELL, FIRE YOUR 
POLICE CHIEF AND HE DID NOT SAY 
ANYTHING. 
>> RIGHT, AND I THINK THAT WAS 
INDICATIVE OF MAYOR PETE'S 
APPROACH TO POLITICS IN GENERAL.
LET'S SEE THE PROCESS PLAY OUT.
WE ARE CONDUCTING AN 
INVESTIGATION AND NOT COMING TO 
RASH DECISIONS.
BUT, I'M NOT NECESSARILY FOR THE
BEST OF ANSWERS THAT THE PUBLIC 
WANTS TO SEE RIGHT NOW, 
ESPECIALLY IN AFTER ERA OF THE 
POLITICS WHERE THINGS ARE 
PRETTY, ARE NOT RULES BASED.

English: 
AT LEAST IN TRUMP'S WORLD.
I THINK COMPARING HIM TO 
SOMEBODY LIKE CASTRO, WHO 
YESTERDAY, REALLY GOT AT HIS 
CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM AND HIS 
PLEASING REFORM AND WAS ABLE TO 
TOUT ALL OF THE POLICIES, MAYOR 
PETE WAS NOT ABLE TO SHOW THE 
SAME, AND SO, TO ME, THE 
ACCOUNTABILITY IS A STEP 
FORWARDER AND A BIG CONTRAST TO 
BIDEN.
WHEN YOU -- WHEN YOU TEE HIM UP 
NEXT TO CASTRO, YOU KNOW, THAT 
WAS SOMETHING WHEN THEY ARE 
SITTING NEXT TO EACH OTHER, IT 
WILL SHOW. 
>> ONE THING WE HAD SPECKS ON.
HE HAD VERY STRONG WORDS.
HE SAID, CHINA IS USING 
TECHNOLOGY FOR THE PERFECTION OF
DICTATOR SHIP.
DID HE REALLY LAYOUT A 
DEMOCRATIC ALTERNATIVE TO 
DEALING WITH CHINA?
>> NO, NOT REALLY.
YOU HEARD OTHERS MENTIONING THE 
PUSH BACK AGAINST CHINA TO 

English: 
CONFRONT THEIR BEHAVIOR.
CERTAINLY YOU HEARD THE MENTION 
OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, THE 
ISSUE THAT THEY CAN RALLY 
AROUND.
I DID NOT HEAR MUCH SPECIFICS 
WITH ANY FOREIGN POLICY.
>> WHAT ABOUT WHEN HE TALKED 
ABOUT THE PATHWAY TO 
CITIZENSHIP.
HE SAID THERE'S 11 MILLION 
PEOPLE, BUT THE WHITE HOUSE HAS 
DIVIDED US ON THE COMMON GROUND 
ISSUE.
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
>> IT'S A COMMON GROUND ISSUE, 
WITH A KMOND BIG END GOAL.
WE DISAGREE IN THE DETAILS.
WE HAVE BEEN DIVIDED ON THE 
ISSUE FOR A LONG TIME.
SO, I THINK ONE OF THE THINGS 
THAT CAME UP, WAS THE OBAMA 
RECORD, THEY CALL IT THE 
DEPORTATION CHIEF.
THE DEPORTER IN CHIEF.
WAS NOT FAMILY SEPARATION, IT'S 
DEPORTATION.
IT'S A DIFFERENCE THERE AND WHAT
IS NOW, IS VIOLENTLY AGGRESSIVE 
WITH CHILDREN BEING TAKEN FROM 

English: 
FAMILIES AND CHILDREN DYING.
WHAT IS NOT BEING CALLED OUT IN 
ALL OF THE THINGS FROM THE 
CRIMINAL JUSTICES REFORM TO THE 
BUSSING SITUATION AND THE 
IMMIGRATION, THE BIG ISSUE ON 
THE TABLE IS AROUND RACIAL 
EQUITY AND NOBODY IS CALLING IT 
OUT.
NOBODY WANTS TO TALK ABOUT IT 
FOR WHAT IT IS.
IT'S THE ISSUE OF RACIAL EQUITY.
AND UNTIL, WE GET COMFORTABLE, 
ABOUT TALKING ABOUT IT, WE ARE 
GOING TO CONTINUE GOING AROUND 
IN CIRCLES AND IT WILL SURFACE 
IN DIFFERENT WAYS AND IN 
DIFFERENT POLICY ISSUES BUT THE 
UNKMRT WE SAW FOR BIDEN NOT 
KNOWING HOW TO RESPOND TO THAT 
WAS HURTFUL CONVERSATION TO 
BUTTIGIEG NOT BEING ABLE TO TALK
ABOUT, I DIDN'T GET IT DONE, IT 
WAS PULLING BACK AND NOT WANTING
TO COME BACK OUT.
MARIANNE WILLIAMSON CAME OUT AND
SAID, LOOK, I DON'T THINK THAT 
AMERICA IS RACIST, BUT I THINK 
THEY ARE WOEFULLY UNDER EDUCATED
ON THE ISSUE OF RACE.
AND KAMALA SAID, NO, I ARE WILL 

English: 
FINISH ANSWERING THAT QUESTION.
BECAUSE, OH, BY THE WAY WITH, 
I'M THE ONLY PERSON OF COLOR 
STANDING ON THE STAGE.
DO YOU THINK THEY WERE MORE 
AGGRESSIVE ON ADDRESSING THE 
ISSUE?
>> MARIANNE WILLIAMSON WAS 
BRINGING UP REPARATIONS.
SHE SAID THAT IT WOULD BE A WAY 
TO ADDRESS THE SYSTEMATIC 
INEQUALITY THAT EXISTS IN 
AMERICA RIGHT NOW.
WHAT I THINK WAS SO EFFECTIVE, 
KAMALA SAYING, HAVING SO MANY 
PERSONALER ANECDOTES THE VISION 
AND TWEETS OF BEING A YOUNG GIRL
AND DEALING WITH BUSSING.
TO ME, IT WAS SOMETHING THAT 
REALLY, REALLY RESONATED.
>> BECAUSE ON THE SAME ISSUE OF 
REPARATION.
YOU MENTION THE BREAKFAST CLUB, 
EVERYONE HAS BEEN ASKED AND THE 

English: 
HOST OF THE SHOW WILL SAY, THEY 
HAVE NOT HEARD ANY SPECIFICS.
YOU SAY IT'S IMPORTANT, IN 
THEORY, WHAT -- WHAT DOES IT 
LOOK LIKE?
IS IT A ISSUE ADDRESSING OR A 
CHECK?

English: 
STAY WITH US HERE ON NBC NEWS 

English: 
NO
>>> LAST NIGHT, DECK DEMOCRATIC 
CANDIDATES HELD BACK MORE WHEN 
THEY WERE REFERENCING PRESIDENT 
TRUMP, BUT TONIGHT WAS A VERY 
DIFFERENT STORY.
>> LET ME TELL YOU SOMETHING, I 
HEAR THAT QUESTION, WHERE WAS 
THAT QUESTION WHEN THE 
REPUBLICANS AND DONALD TRUMP 
PASSED THE TAX BILL THAT 
BENEFITTED THE TOP 1%.
>> THE AMERICAN PEOPLE 
UNDERSTAND THAT TRUMP IS A 
PHONY, THAT TRUMP IS A 
PATHOLOGICAL LIAR AND A RACIST 
AND HE LIED TO THE AMERICAN 
PEOPLE DURING HIS CAMPAIGN.
HE SAID THAT HE WAS GOING TO 
STAND UP FOR WORKING FAMILIES.
WELL, PRESIDENT TRUMP, YOU ARE 
NOT STANDING FOR WORKING 
FAMILIES WHEN YOU ARE TRYING TO 
THROW 32 MILLION PEOPLE OFF THE 
HEALTH CARE THAT THEY HAVE AND 
THAT 83% OF YOUR TAX BENEFITS GO
TO THE TOP 1%.
THAT IS HOW WE BEAT TRUMP.
WE EXPOSE HIM FOR THE FRAUD THAT
HE IS.

English: 
>> WHAT DOES DONALD TRUMP DO?
HE SAYS GO BACK TO WHERE YOU 
CAME FROM, THAT IS NOT 
REFLECTIVE OF OUR AMERICA AND 
OUR VALUES AND IT HAS TO END.
>> WHAT PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS 
DONE, IS NOT ONLY ATTACK THE 
CHILDREN AND DEMONIZE THE 
IMMIGRANTS HE IS ATTACKING A 
BASIC PRINCIPAL OF AMERICA'S 
MORALE CORE.
WE OPEN OUR HEARTS TO THE 
STRANGER.
THE WORST THING HE HAS DONE, HE 
HAS DIVERTED THE FUNDS AWAY FROM
CROSS BORDER TERRORISM AND HE 
HAS GIVEN THAT MONEY TO THE 
FOUR -- IN PRESIDENT OBAMA DID A
HECK OF A JOB.
COMPARE HIM TO WHAT THIS GUY IS 
DOING IS IMMORALE.
THIS PRESIDENT THOUGH, FOR 
IMMIGRANTS, THERE'S NOTHING HE 
WILL NOT DO TO SEPARATE A 
FAMILY, CAGE A CHILD, OR ERASE 
THEIR EXISTENCE.
>> OH, ONE OF THOR WORST THINGS 
ABOUT PRESIDENT TRUMP THAT HE 
HAS DONE TO THE COUNTRY, IS HE 
HAS TORN APART THE MORALE FABRIC
OF WHO WE ARE.
WHEN HE STARTED TO SEPARATE 

English: 
CHILDREN AT THE BORDER FROM 
THEIR PARENTS.
THE FACT THAT SEVEN CHILDREN 
HAVE DIED IN HIS CUSTODY.
THE FACT HAD THAT DOZENS OF 
CHILDREN HAVE BEEN SEPARATED 
FROM THEIR PARENTS AND THEY HAVE
NO PLAN TO REUNITE THEM.
>> ON DAY ONE, WE TAKE OUT OUR 
EXECUTIVE ORDER PEN AND RESCIND 
EVERYTHING ON THIS ISSUE THAT 
TRUMP HAS DONE. 
>> WHAT IS THE GREATEST NATIONAL
SECURITY THREAT TO THE UNITED 
STATES?
IT'S DONALD TRUMP.
AND I WILL IT WILL YOU WHY.
AND I WILL TELL YOU WHY.
I AGREE, CLIMBED CHANGE IS A 
THREAT.
HE DENIES THE SCIENCE.
YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT NORTH 
KOREA, REAL THREAT IN TERMS OF 
NUCLEAR ARSENAL, HE EMBRACES KIM
JONG-UN.
>> MR. PRESIDENT, IF YOU ARE 
LISTENING, YOU HAVE HARNESSED 
FEAR FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES AND 
ONLY LOVE CAN CAST THAT OUT.
I, I HAVE A FEELING YOU KNOW 
WHAT YOU ARE DOING, I WILL 
HARNESS LOVE FOR POLITICAL 

English: 
PURPOSES AND I WILL MEET YOU ON 
THE FIELD AND SIR, LOVE WILL 
WIN.
>> SO, FOR FINAL THOUGHTS.
LET GET BACK TO THE PANEL.
WAS IT STRATEGIC AND WAS IT 
SMART TO MAKE TRUMP MORE OF THE 
FOCUS TONIGHT?
>> WELL TRUMP ENJOYED IT.
HE WAS LIVE TWEETING.
HE DID NOT SAY IT WAS BORING 
THIS TIME.
AND YOU SAW HIM GO AFTER THE 
DEMOCRATS FOR THEIR POSITIONS ON
PROVIDING HEALTH CARE TO 
UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS AND 
CROSSING THE BORDER.
>> WHAT DID YOU THINK?
I THINK THEY NEED TO TALK ABOUT 
TRUMP TONIGHT.
I THINK THAT WAS MISSING FROM 
LAST NIGHT AND YOU NEED TO TALK 
ABOUT DONALD TRUMP BECAUSE 
NOTHING ABOUT THE MOMENT IS 
NORMAL.
>> WHAT DID YOU THINK, DID YOU 
FEEL LIKE THIS TONIGHT, GAVE 
DONALD TRUMP MORE FODER BECAUSE 
OF THE DIVISION?
>> I THINK WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT 
THE THING.
IF I'M A DEMOCRAT, I'M CONCERNED
ABOUT A COUPLE OF THINGS.
WHO CAN BEAT DONALD TRUMP IN THE

English: 
STATES WHERE IT MATTERS.
IF YOU LOOK AT PENNSYLVANIA, 
TRUMP BEAT HILARY CLINTON BY 
44,000 VOTES AND IN FLORIDA BY 
100,000 VOTES.
THAT IS NOT A WIDE MARGIN THAT 
IS NOT BEATABLE.
IF I'M GOING TO MAKE THE CASE 
THAT I CAN BEAT THIS GUY, HOW DO
I MAKE UP THE MARGINS?
THAT HAS TO BE THE QUESTION WHEN
WHEN YOU ARE THINKING ABOUT 
POLITICS.
>> IT WAS NOT JUST ABOUT 
FOCUSING ON DONALD TRUM.
IT WAS ABOUT FOCUSING ON EACH 
OTHER.
AND THEN, WE SAW A SIMILAR 
TACTIC TONIGHT AS LAST NIGHT, 
THESE GUYS WERE POLLING IN THE 
SINGLE DIGITS ON THE END OF THE 
STAGE, THEY WERE COMING FOR THE 
GUYS IN THE CENTER OF THE STAGE.
WE SAW -- GO 
FOR BIDEN, OR BENNETT GOING FOR 
BERNIE.
DID THAT WORK?

English: 
>> I THINK IT IS HARD TO KEEP 
TRACK WHERE PEOPLE STAND ON THE 
ISSUE.
TO STAND OUT, YOU HAVE TO GO 
AFTER THE GUY IN CHARGE.
YOU ARE RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT, 
YOU ARE NOT RUNNING TO JUST BE 
THERE.
ONE OFFICE.
AND YOU KNOW, I THINK GOING BACK
TO THE THING I SAID EARLIER WITH
ABOUT KA PAULA HARRIS MUCH.
IT'S IMPORTANT TO SHOW UP AND 
ACT LIKE YOU ARE THERE TO BE 
PRESIDENT.
YOU ARE NOT THERE TO BE VICE 
PRESIDENT, YOU ARE NOT RUNNING 
JUST TO UP YOUR NAME 
RECOGNITION.
YOU ARE RUNNING TO DO THE JOB 
AND I THINK GOING AFTER BIDEN 
DIRECTLY SHOWS YOU ARE WILLING 
TO TAKE ON SOMEBODY WHO WAS A 
VICE PRESIDENT.
>>BUT WAS IT AFFECTIVE?
>> I DON'T THINK THAT ANYBODY 
STOOD OUT AS MUCH AS SECRETARY 
CASTRO DID LAST NIGHT.
YOU SAW BENNETT AND HICKENLOOPER
AND THEY WENT AFTER MAYOR PETE.
>> I CONSIDER HER IN A DIFFERENT
TIER, GOING AFTER THE BIG 
CANDIDATES.
KAMALA IS IN A LEAGUE OF HER 
OWN.
BUT, YOU KNOW, MICHAEL BENNETT 

English: 
AND THE LOWER TIER CANDIDATES 
DID NOT DO ANYTHING TO HELP 
THEIR THIRD AND FOURTH ROUND 
DEBATE.
>> PEOPLE ARE TUNED IN AND 
CURIOUS.
WAS THERE ANYTHING THAT YOU 
HEARD TONIGHT THAT WOULD REALLY 
JAZZ UP THE PEOPLE WHO STAY HOME
BACK IN 2016?
>> I'M GOING TO BE HONEST, NOT 
YET, BUT IT'S EARLY.
RIGHT?
THERE'S SO MANY DEBATES TO COME.
CANDIDATES HAVE TO CONTINUE TO 
BUILD OUT THE OPERATIONAL 
INFRASTRUCTURES.
WE DO NOT PAY A LOT OF ATTENTION
TO THIS.
DEBATE PERFORMANCES ARE GREAT, 
BUT ARE YOU LAYING THE 
FOUNDATION, WHICH IS HOW YOU 
TARGET, HOW YOU MOBILIZE A 
CONSTITUENTSY THAT PROPELS YOU 
TO VICTORY.
AND IT'S TOO EARLY TO PREDICT 
THIS YET. 
>> YEAH, THEY ARE FOCUSED ON THE
PROGRESSIVE VOTERS AND THE 
QUESTION IS, BY TAKING THAT 
STANCE, WILL IT BE HARDER TO 
APPEAL TO VOTERS IN THE GENERAL.
>> AND THE QUESTION IS, WILL IT 
WORK WE HAVE A HARD BREAK IN A 
MOMENT.
I WANT TO THANK EACH OF YOU FOR 
COMING IN TONIGHT.
AND ALL THOSE THAT ARE NOT ON 
THE COUCH.
AND ALL OF THE STUDENTS AND OF 

English: 
COURSE, ALL OF YOU AT HOME.
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR WATCHING, 
THE FIRST DEMOCRATIC 
PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE.
DON'T GO ANYWHERE, WE WILL 
REPLAY NIGHT TWO OF THE FIRST 
DEMOCRATIC DEBATE, JUST COMING 
UP NEXT.
OTHERWISE, TUNE IN TOMORROW AT 
3:00 P.M. EASTERN FOR MORE ON 
NBC NEWS NOW.
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR SPENDING 
YOUR EVENING WITH US.
