FOR THAT. PERFECTLY TEED UP NOW FOR OUR
PERFECTLY TEED UP NOW FOR OUR NEXT GUEST.
NEXT GUEST. THANKS TO MONICA IN ORLANDO.
THANKS TO MONICA IN ORLANDO. >>> VERMONT INDEPENDENT SENATOR
>>> VERMONT INDEPENDENT SENATOR DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL
DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES
CANDIDATES CANDIDATE BERNIE SANDERS JOINS
CANDIDATE BERNIE SANDERS JOINS ME.
ME. THE PRESIDENT HAS BEEN TWEETING
THE PRESIDENT HAS BEEN TWEETING AHEAD OF HIS BIG ANNOUNCEMENT
AHEAD OF HIS BIG ANNOUNCEMENT THAT NEXT WEEK I.C.E. WILL BEGIN
THAT NEXT WEEK I.C.E. WILL BEGIN THE PROCESS OF REMOVING THE
THE PROCESS OF REMOVING THE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL ALIENS WHO
MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL ALIENS WHO HAVE FOUND THEIR WAY INTO THE
HAVE FOUND THEIR WAY INTO THE UNITED STATES.
UNITED STATES. NOW OUR REPORTERS HAVE NOT FOUND
NOW OUR REPORTERS HAVE NOT FOUND ANY NEW PLAN ON THE BOOKS.
ANY NEW PLAN ON THE BOOKS. THIS SOUNDS LIKE THE SAME GAME
THIS SOUNDS LIKE THE SAME GAME PLAN BEFORE THE 2018 MIDTERMS TO
PLAN BEFORE THE 2018 MIDTERMS TO FIRE UP HIS BASE.
FIRE UP HIS BASE. YOUR REACTION TO HIS TWEET AND
YOUR REACTION TO HIS TWEET AND TO HIS USING THIS RHETORIC ON
TO HIS USING THIS RHETORIC ON IMMIGRATION RIGHT NOW?
IMMIGRATION RIGHT NOW? >> I THINK YOU’RE RIGHT.
>> I THINK YOU’RE RIGHT. I THINK THIS IS A POLITICAL
I THINK THIS IS A POLITICAL STATEMENT TO HIS BASE.
STATEMENT TO HIS BASE. FRANKLY EI THINK IT’S AN
FRANKLY EI THINK IT’S AN OUTRAGEOUS STATEMENT.
OUTRAGEOUS STATEMENT. IT’S NOT WHAT OUR COUNTRY STANDS
IT’S NOT WHAT OUR COUNTRY STANDS FOR AND IT’S EXACTLY WHAT
FOR AND IT’S EXACTLY WHAT DEMAGOGUES ALWAYS DO.
DEMAGOGUES ALWAYS DO. HE’LL NOT TALK ABOUT THE
HE’LL NOT TALK ABOUT THE HEALTHCARE CRISIS.
HEALTHCARE CRISIS. HE’LL NOT TALK ABOUT WEALTH
HE’LL NOT TALK ABOUT WEALTH INEQUALITY.
INEQUALITY. HE’LL NOT TALK ABOUT CLIMATE
HE’LL NOT TALK ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE.
CHANGE. BUT HE WILL TRY TO DIVIDE THE
BUT HE WILL TRY TO DIVIDE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE UP.
AMERICAN PEOPLE UP. HE’LL GO AFTER MINORITY PEOPLE,
HE’LL GO AFTER MINORITY PEOPLE, IN THIS CASE UNDOCUMENTED PEOPLE
IN THIS CASE UNDOCUMENTED PEOPLE WHO HAVE VERY LITTLE POLITICAL
WHO HAVE VERY LITTLE POLITICAL POWER.
POWER. THAT’S WHAT DEMAGOGUES ALWAYS
THAT’S WHAT DEMAGOGUES ALWAYS DO.
DO. THAT’S WHY TRUMP MUST BE
THAT’S WHY TRUMP MUST BE DEFEATED.
DEFEATED. >> YOU KNOW, WHEN WE LOOK
>> YOU KNOW, WHEN WE LOOK FORWARD TOWARDS THE DEBATES, THE
FORWARD TOWARDS THE DEBATES, THE PRESIDENT ON TWITTER TODAY -- HE
PRESIDENT ON TWITTER TODAY -- HE MAY OR MAY DO THIS -- HE’S
MAY OR MAY DO THIS -- HE’S TALKING ABOUT LIVE TWEETING
TALKING ABOUT LIVE TWEETING WHILE YOU GUYS ARE ON THE DEBATE
WHILE YOU GUYS ARE ON THE DEBATE STAGE.
STAGE. WHAT’S YOUR REACTION TO THAT?
WHAT’S YOUR REACTION TO THAT? >> WELL, I’M SURPRISED HE HAS
>> WELL, I’M SURPRISED HE HAS THE TIME TO TWEET.
THE TIME TO TWEET. I THOUGHT HE’D BE WATCHING SOME
I THOUGHT HE’D BE WATCHING SOME FOX TV PROGRAM.
FOX TV PROGRAM. LOOK, HE CAN TWEET ALL HE WANTS
LOOK, HE CAN TWEET ALL HE WANTS TO TWEET.
TO TWEET. BUT LET ME JUST SAY THIS, YOU
BUT LET ME JUST SAY THIS, YOU HAVE A PRESIDENT, WHO DESPITE
HAVE A PRESIDENT, WHO DESPITE WHAT ONE OF HIS SUPPORTERS
WHAT ONE OF HIS SUPPORTERS MENTIONED, IS IN FACT A
MENTIONED, IS IN FACT A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.
PATHOLOGICAL LIAR. HE’S A RACIST, HE’S A SEXIST,
HE’S A RACIST, HE’S A SEXIST, HE’S A HOMOPHOBE.
HE’S A HOMOPHOBE. HE IS IS A RELIGIOUS BIGOT.
HE IS IS A RELIGIOUS BIGOT. THIS IS A PRESIDENT WHO IS ALSO
THIS IS A PRESIDENT WHO IS ALSO A PHONY.
A PHONY. WHO TOLD HIS SUPPORTERS IN 2016
WHO TOLD HIS SUPPORTERS IN 2016 HE’D STAND WITH THE WORKING
HE’D STAND WITH THE WORKING CLASS OF THIS COUNTRY, AND OF
CLASS OF THIS COUNTRY, AND OF COURSE HE LIED.
COURSE HE LIED. I SUSPECT TONIGHT IN HIS SPEECH
I SUSPECT TONIGHT IN HIS SPEECH HE’LL NOT TELL THEM HE TRIED TO
HE’LL NOT TELL THEM HE TRIED TO THROW 32 MILLION PEOPLE OFF OF
THROW 32 MILLION PEOPLE OFF OF HEALTHCARE.
HEALTHCARE. HIS LAST BUDGET CALLED FOR A
HIS LAST BUDGET CALLED FOR A TRILLION AND A HALF CUT TO
TRILLION AND A HALF CUT TO MEDICAID.
MEDICAID. BILLIONS IN CUTS TO SOCIAL
BILLIONS IN CUTS TO SOCIAL SECURITY.
SECURITY. HE TOLD HIS SUPPORTERS IN 2016
HE TOLD HIS SUPPORTERS IN 2016 HIS TAX PLAN WOULD NOT BENEFIT
HIS TAX PLAN WOULD NOT BENEFIT THE WEALTHY.
THE WEALTHY. HE LIED.
HE LIED. 83% OF THOSE BENEFITS ARE GOING
83% OF THOSE BENEFITS ARE GOING TO GO TO THE TOP 1% AFTER TEN
TO GO TO THE TOP 1% AFTER TEN YEARS.
YEARS. >> AT THE SAME TIME, HE VIEWS
>> AT THE SAME TIME, HE VIEWS THE STOCK MARKET AS THE INDEX OF
THE STOCK MARKET AS THE INDEX OF HOW GOOD THE ECONOMY IS.
HOW GOOD THE ECONOMY IS. SO DO A LOT OF AMERICANS.
SO DO A LOT OF AMERICANS. THEY’RE NOT LOOKING AT THE
THEY’RE NOT LOOKING AT THE INTERNAL PROBLEMS, THE WAGE
INTERNAL PROBLEMS, THE WAGE DESPAIRSTIES
DESPAIRSTIES DISPARITY
DISPARITY DISPARITIES, BUT A LOT OF
DISPARITIES, BUT A LOT OF PEOPLE, HIS SUPPORTERS ARE
PEOPLE, HIS SUPPORTERS ARE SAYING THE STOCK MARKET IS UP
SAYING THE STOCK MARKET IS UP AND BUSINESS THE COMMUNITY SEEMS
AND BUSINESS THE COMMUNITY SEEMS TO BE SUPPORTIVE.
TO BE SUPPORTIVE. HOW DO YOU COMBAT THAT?
HOW DO YOU COMBAT THAT? >> I TELL YOU HOW --
>> I TELL YOU HOW -- >> THE POWERS OF INCUMBENCY AND
>> THE POWERS OF INCUMBENCY AND HE’S RAISED SO MUCH MORE MONEY.
HE’S RAISED SO MUCH MORE MONEY. >> IN THIS SENSE, I THINK IT’S
>> IN THIS SENSE, I THINK IT’S NOT JUST HIS SUPPORTERS.
NOT JUST HIS SUPPORTERS. THIS IS VERY OFTEN WHAT MEDIA
THIS IS VERY OFTEN WHAT MEDIA DOES.
DOES. THE STOCK MARKET IS UP, THE
THE STOCK MARKET IS UP, THE ECONOMY IS GOOD.
ECONOMY IS GOOD. HERE’S A FACT.
HERE’S A FACT. THAT RIGHT NOW TODAY THE AVERAGE
THAT RIGHT NOW TODAY THE AVERAGE AMERICAN WORKER IS MAKING IN
AMERICAN WORKER IS MAKING IN REAL INFLATION ACCOUNTED FOR
REAL INFLATION ACCOUNTED FOR DOLLARS, DESPITE HUGE INCREASES
DOLLARS, DESPITE HUGE INCREASES IN TECHNOLOGY AND PRODUCTIVITY
IN TECHNOLOGY AND PRODUCTIVITY THE SAME AMOUNT OF MONEY HE OR
THE SAME AMOUNT OF MONEY HE OR SHE MADE 45 YEARS AGO.
SHE MADE 45 YEARS AGO. THAT SOUND LIKE A GOOD ECONOMY?
THAT SOUND LIKE A GOOD ECONOMY? TODAY WHAT WE’RE SEEING IS A
TODAY WHAT WE’RE SEEING IS A YOUNGER GENERATION.
YOUNGER GENERATION. EVERYTHING BEING EQUAL.
EVERYTHING BEING EQUAL. THE MILLENIALS.
THE MILLENIALS. THEY’LL HAVE A LOWER STANDARD OF
THEY’LL HAVE A LOWER STANDARD OF LIVING THAN THEIR PARENTS.
LIVING THAN THEIR PARENTS. TODAY WHAT WE’RE SEEING IS THAT
TODAY WHAT WE’RE SEEING IS THAT OVER THE LAST 30 YEARS, THE TOP
OVER THE LAST 30 YEARS, THE TOP 1% HAVE SEEN A $21 TRILLION
1% HAVE SEEN A $21 TRILLION INCREASE IN THEIR WEALTH.
INCREASE IN THEIR WEALTH. THE BOTTOM HALF OF AMERICANS
THE BOTTOM HALF OF AMERICANS HAVE LOST $900 BILLION.
HAVE LOST $900 BILLION. MASSIVE INCOME AND WEALTH
MASSIVE INCOME AND WEALTH INEQUALITY.
INEQUALITY. TENS OF MILLIONS OF PARENTS
TENS OF MILLIONS OF PARENTS LIVING PAYCHECK TO PAYCHECK.
LIVING PAYCHECK TO PAYCHECK. THOSE ARE THE ISSUES I’LL TALK
THOSE ARE THE ISSUES I’LL TALK ABOUT DURING THIS CAMPAIGN AND
ABOUT DURING THIS CAMPAIGN AND THOSE ARE THE ISSUES THE AVERAGE
THOSE ARE THE ISSUES THE AVERAGE AMERICAN UNDERSTANDS.
AMERICAN UNDERSTANDS. >> I WANT TO ASK YOU ABOUT IRAN.
>> I WANT TO ASK YOU ABOUT IRAN. WE’RE SEEING INCREASING
WE’RE SEEING INCREASING TENSIONS.
TENSIONS. SECRETARY POMPEO IS GOING TO BE
SECRETARY POMPEO IS GOING TO BE SPEAKING FROM SENT COM.
SPEAKING FROM SENT COM. IRAN IS THREATENING TO BREAK OUT
IRAN IS THREATENING TO BREAK OUT OF THE NUCLEAR DEAL FOR THE
OF THE NUCLEAR DEAL FOR THE FIRST TIME IN 14 MONTHS, EVEN
FIRST TIME IN 14 MONTHS, EVEN THOUGH THE PRESIDENT WITHDREW
THOUGH THE PRESIDENT WITHDREW FROM IT.
FROM IT. WE SEE THESE HITS ON THE
WE SEE THESE HITS ON THE TANKERS.
TANKERS. THEY SAY THERE’S INTELLIGENCE,
THEY SAY THERE’S INTELLIGENCE, THE BRITS AGREE WITH THE U.S.
THE BRITS AGREE WITH THE U.S. THIS WAS IRANIAN PROXYEDIED.
THIS WAS IRANIAN PROXYEDIED. WHAT DO YOU DO RIGHT NOW WHERE
WHAT DO YOU DO RIGHT NOW WHERE IRAN IS ARGUABLY ACTING
IRAN IS ARGUABLY ACTING AGGRESSIVELY, EVEN --
AGGRESSIVELY, EVEN -- >> WHOA, WHOA E WHOA --
>> WHOA, WHOA E WHOA -- >> -- IN REACTION TO THE U.S.
>> -- IN REACTION TO THE U.S. POLICY MAKING.
POLICY MAKING. >> JUST A COUPLE OF POINTS.
>> JUST A COUPLE OF POINTS. FIRST OF ALL, WHAT IS ABSOLUTELY
FIRST OF ALL, WHAT IS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY IS AN OBJECTIVE
NECESSARY IS AN OBJECTIVE INVESTIGATION AS TO THESE
INVESTIGATION AS TO THESE INCIDENTS.
INCIDENTS. THE DESTRUCTION OR THE BOMBING
THE DESTRUCTION OR THE BOMBING OR ATTACKING OF OIL TANKERS IN
OR ATTACKING OF OIL TANKERS IN THE GULF OF OMAN IS NOT
THE GULF OF OMAN IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.
ACCEPTABLE. WE NEED TO INVESTIGATE IT.
WE NEED TO INVESTIGATE IT. >> YOU DON’T ACCEPT -- LET ME
>> YOU DON’T ACCEPT -- LET ME JUST ASK YOU DON’T ACCEPT THE
JUST ASK YOU DON’T ACCEPT THE DECLARATION FROM THE SECRETARY
DECLARATION FROM THE SECRETARY OF STATE?
OF STATE? >> NO, IT DON’T.
>> NO, IT DON’T. IT NEEDS TO BE AN OBJECTIVE
IT NEEDS TO BE AN OBJECTIVE INVESTIGATION.
INVESTIGATION. AS YOU KNOW THE JAPANESE -- IN
AS YOU KNOW THE JAPANESE -- IN FACT, THE OWNER OF THE TANKER
FACT, THE OWNER OF THE TANKER THAT WAS ATTACKED DISAGREES WITH
THAT WAS ATTACKED DISAGREES WITH TRUMP.
TRUMP. BUT HERE’S THE MAIN POINT I WANT
BUT HERE’S THE MAIN POINT I WANT TO MAKE.
TO MAKE. IF YOU LOOK AT THE RECENT
IF YOU LOOK AT THE RECENT HISTORY OF THIS COUNTRY, I THINK
HISTORY OF THIS COUNTRY, I THINK WE UNDERSTAND THAT THE TWO WORST
WE UNDERSTAND THAT THE TWO WORST FOREIGN POLICY DISASTERS WERE
FOREIGN POLICY DISASTERS WERE BASED ON LIES THAT CAME FROM THE
BASED ON LIES THAT CAME FROM THE WHITE HOUSE.
WHITE HOUSE. YOU REMEMBER THE SO-CALLED GULF
YOU REMEMBER THE SO-CALLED GULF OF TONKIN INCIDENT THAT LED US
OF TONKIN INCIDENT THAT LED US TO INCREASE MILITARY INVOLVEMENT
TO INCREASE MILITARY INVOLVEMENT IN VIETNAM.
IN VIETNAM. I COULD SPEAK -- THAT WAS MY
I COULD SPEAK -- THAT WAS MY GENERATION.
GENERATION. 59,000 BRAVE YOUNG MEN NEVER
59,000 BRAVE YOUNG MEN NEVER CAME HOME FROM THAT WAR.
CAME HOME FROM THAT WAR. TENS OF THOUSANDS DIED,
TENS OF THOUSANDS DIED, COMMITTED SUICIDE, GOT INTO
COMMITTED SUICIDE, GOT INTO DRUGS WHEN THEY CAME HOME.
DRUGS WHEN THEY CAME HOME. THAT WAS BASED ON A LIE.
THAT WAS BASED ON A LIE. THEN YOU LOOK MORE RECENTLY AT
THEN YOU LOOK MORE RECENTLY AT THE WAR IN IRAQ, WHICH I OPPOSE
THE WAR IN IRAQ, WHICH I OPPOSE BECAUSE I DID NOT BELIEVE CHENEY
BECAUSE I DID NOT BELIEVE CHENEY AND I DID NOT BELIEVE JOHN
AND I DID NOT BELIEVE JOHN BOLTON.
BOLTON. I DID NOT BELIEVE THE BUSH
I DID NOT BELIEVE THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION.
ADMINISTRATION. AGAIN, BASED ON A LIE THAT
AGAIN, BASED ON A LIE THAT SADDAM HUSSEIN AND IRAQ HAD
SADDAM HUSSEIN AND IRAQ HAD WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION.
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. LET ME JUST SAY THIS, I’LL DO
LET ME JUST SAY THIS, I’LL DO EVERYTHING I PERSONALLY CAN AS A
EVERYTHING I PERSONALLY CAN AS A UNITED STATES SENATOR TO STOP
UNITED STATES SENATOR TO STOP THE UNITED STATES ATTACKING
THE UNITED STATES ATTACKING IRAN.
IRAN. IF WE GO INTO A WAR WITH IRAN,
IF WE GO INTO A WAR WITH IRAN, THIS WILL BE AN ASYMMETRICAL WAR
THIS WILL BE AN ASYMMETRICAL WAR WHICH WILL GO ON AND ON AND ON.
WHICH WILL GO ON AND ON AND ON. THERE WILL BE NEVER ENDING WARS
THERE WILL BE NEVER ENDING WARS IN THE MIDDLE EAST.
IN THE MIDDLE EAST. IT WILL MAKE THE WAR IN IRAQ
IT WILL MAKE THE WAR IN IRAQ LOOK LIKE A CAKE WALK.
LOOK LIKE A CAKE WALK. SO WE HAVE GOT TO DO EVERYTHING
SO WE HAVE GOT TO DO EVERYTHING WE CAN TO BRING THE ANTAGONISTS,
WE CAN TO BRING THE ANTAGONISTS, SAUDI ARABIA, WHICH IS A BRUTAL
SAUDI ARABIA, WHICH IS A BRUTAL DICTATORSHIP, TOGETHER WITH
DICTATORSHIP, TOGETHER WITH IRAN.
IRAN. BRING THEM TOGETHER.
BRING THEM TOGETHER. USE THE POWER OF THE UNITED
USE THE POWER OF THE UNITED STATES TO WORK OUT A DIPLOMATIC
STATES TO WORK OUT A DIPLOMATIC SOLUTION, NOT A MILITARY
SOLUTION, NOT A MILITARY SOLUTION.
SOLUTION. >> YOU’RE GOING TO BE ON A
>> YOU’RE GOING TO BE ON A DEBATE STAGE NEXT WEEK FACING
DEBATE STAGE NEXT WEEK FACING OFF FOR THE FIRST TIME WITH JOE
OFF FOR THE FIRST TIME WITH JOE BIDEN.
BIDEN. WHAT’S YOUR STRATEGY GOING
WHAT’S YOUR STRATEGY GOING AGAINST THE FRONTRUNNER?
AGAINST THE FRONTRUNNER? >> WELL, YOU PROMISE NOT TO TELL
>> WELL, YOU PROMISE NOT TO TELL JOE?
JOE? >> PROMISE NOT TO TELL.
>> PROMISE NOT TO TELL. >> ALL RIGHT.
>> ALL RIGHT. IF THAT’S THE CASE, LOOK, JOE
IF THAT’S THE CASE, LOOK, JOE AND I ARE FRIENDS.
AND I ARE FRIENDS. I’VE KNOWN HIM FOR MANY YEARS.
I’VE KNOWN HIM FOR MANY YEARS. I THOUGHT HE WAS A VERY GOOD
I THOUGHT HE WAS A VERY GOOD VICE PRESIDENT.
VICE PRESIDENT. BUT JOE AND I HAVE A DIFFERENT
BUT JOE AND I HAVE A DIFFERENT OUTLOOK ON THE WORLD.
OUTLOOK ON THE WORLD. WE HAVE A DIFFERENT VOTING
WE HAVE A DIFFERENT VOTING RECORD.
RECORD. JOE VOTED FOR THE WAR IN IRAQ, I
JOE VOTED FOR THE WAR IN IRAQ, I VOTED AGAINST THE WAR IN IRAQ.
VOTED AGAINST THE WAR IN IRAQ. JOE VOTED FOR A LOT OF WHAT I
JOE VOTED FOR A LOT OF WHAT I CONSIDER TO BE DISASTROUS TRADE
CONSIDER TO BE DISASTROUS TRADE AGREEMENTS, NAFTA, PNCR WITH
AGREEMENTS, NAFTA, PNCR WITH CHINA.
CHINA. COST US MILLIONS OF GOOD PAYING
COST US MILLIONS OF GOOD PAYING JOBS.
JOBS. I HELPED LEAD THE OPPOSITION
I HELPED LEAD THE OPPOSITION AGAINST THOSE TRADE AGREEMENTS.
AGAINST THOSE TRADE AGREEMENTS. JOE VOTED FOR THE DEREGULATION
JOE VOTED FOR THE DEREGULATION OF WALL STREET.
OF WALL STREET. I STRONGLY OPPOSED THAT.
I STRONGLY OPPOSED THAT. HERE’S WHAT I BELIEVE IN TERMS
HERE’S WHAT I BELIEVE IN TERMS OF 2020.
OF 2020. JOE WANTS TO BEAT DONALD TRUMP
JOE WANTS TO BEAT DONALD TRUMP AND I WANT TO BEAT DONALD TRUMP
AND I WANT TO BEAT DONALD TRUMP AND EVERY DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE
AND EVERY DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNDERSTANDS HOW IMPORTANT IT IS
UNDERSTANDS HOW IMPORTANT IT IS THAT WE DEFEAT DONALD TRUMP.
THAT WE DEFEAT DONALD TRUMP. I HAPPEN TO BELIEVE THAT THE
I HAPPEN TO BELIEVE THAT THE ONLY WAY WE DEFEAT TRUMP IS
ONLY WAY WE DEFEAT TRUMP IS THROUGH A LARGE VOTER TURNOUT.
THROUGH A LARGE VOTER TURNOUT. YOU CREATE EXCITEMENT.
YOU CREATE EXCITEMENT. YOU GET YOUNG PEOPLE AND WORKING
YOU GET YOUNG PEOPLE AND WORKING PEOPLE INVOLVED IN THE POLITICAL
PEOPLE INVOLVED IN THE POLITICAL PROCESS.
PROCESS. THE ONLY WAY I KNOW HOW YOU DO
THE ONLY WAY I KNOW HOW YOU DO THAT IS YOU TALK ABOUT THE REAL
THAT IS YOU TALK ABOUT THE REAL ISSUES THAT IMPACT PEOPLE’S
ISSUES THAT IMPACT PEOPLE’S LIVES.
LIVES. HEALTHCARE IS A HUMAN RIGHT.
HEALTHCARE IS A HUMAN RIGHT. WE NEED MEDICARE FOR ALL L. WE
WE NEED MEDICARE FOR ALL L. WE HAVE TO RAISE THE MINIMUM WAGE
HAVE TO RAISE THE MINIMUM WAGE TO $15 AN HOUR.
TO $15 AN HOUR. WE’VE GOT TO MAKE PUBLIC
WE’VE GOT TO MAKE PUBLIC COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES
COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES TUITION FREE AND SUBSTANTIALLY
TUITION FREE AND SUBSTANTIALLY REDUCE STUDENT DEBT.
REDUCE STUDENT DEBT. YOU WANT TO GET YOUNG PEOPLE
YOU WANT TO GET YOUNG PEOPLE INVOLVED?
INVOLVED? THEIR GENERATION IS HURTING.
THEIR GENERATION IS HURTING. THEY’RE OVERLY IN DEBT.
THEY’RE OVERLY IN DEBT. YOU GOT TO TALK ABOUT CLIMATE
YOU GOT TO TALK ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE IN A BOLD WAY.
CHANGE IN A BOLD WAY. BECAUSE THE SCIENTISTS TELL US
BECAUSE THE SCIENTISTS TELL US WE HAVE 12 YEARS TO TRANSFORM
WE HAVE 12 YEARS TO TRANSFORM OUR ENERGY SYSTEM.
OUR ENERGY SYSTEM. MY VIEW IS WE WIN WHEN WE BRING
MY VIEW IS WE WIN WHEN WE BRING OUT LARGE NUMBERS OF PEOPLE,
OUT LARGE NUMBERS OF PEOPLE, WHEN WE TELL THE TRUTH THAT
WHEN WE TELL THE TRUTH THAT TRUMP SUPPORTERS, ABOUT HIS
TRUMP SUPPORTERS, ABOUT HIS LIES.
LIES. WHEN WE FIGHT FOR CRIMINAL
WHEN WE FIGHT FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM, FIGHT FOR
JUSTICE REFORM, FIGHT FOR IMMIGRATION REFORM, CREATE
IMMIGRATION REFORM, CREATE EXCITEMENT AT THE GRASS ROOTS
EXCITEMENT AT THE GRASS ROOTS LEVEL.
LEVEL. THAT’S HOW WE WIN.
THAT’S HOW WE WIN. I THINK THOSE ARE THE ISSUES
I THINK THOSE ARE THE ISSUES WE’RE TALKING ABOUT.
WE’RE TALKING ABOUT. AS YOU KNOW, MANY OF THE
AS YOU KNOW, MANY OF THE POLLS -- THE LAST FIVE POLLS
POLLS -- THE LAST FIVE POLLS THAT WERE OUT THERE HAD ME
THAT WERE OUT THERE HAD ME BEATING TRUMP BY AT LEAST NINE
BEATING TRUMP BY AT LEAST NINE POINTS.
POINTS. SOMETIMES DOUBLE DIGITS.
SOMETIMES DOUBLE DIGITS. WE CAN BEAT TRUMP IF WE’RE
WE CAN BEAT TRUMP IF WE’RE PREPARED TO TALK ABOUT THE
PREPARED TO TALK ABOUT THE ISSUES IMPACTING WORKING PEOPLE
ISSUES IMPACTING WORKING PEOPLE AND GET THEM INVOLVED IN THE
AND GET THEM INVOLVED IN THE POLITICAL PROCESS.
POLITICAL PROCESS. >> SENATOR, ONE OF THE
>> SENATOR, ONE OF THE CANDIDATES WHO IS TALKING ABOUT
CANDIDATES WHO IS TALKING ABOUT ISSUES MORE THAN ANYONE IS
ISSUES MORE THAN ANYONE IS ELIZABETH WARREN, YOUR
ELIZABETH WARREN, YOUR COLLEAGUE.
COLLEAGUE. ALSO AGAINST WALL STREET,
ALSO AGAINST WALL STREET, AGAINST BIG BUSINESS.
AGAINST BIG BUSINESS. MANY OF YOUR ISSUES, YET SHE’S
MANY OF YOUR ISSUES, YET SHE’S MOVING UP IN MANY OF THESE POLLS
MOVING UP IN MANY OF THESE POLLS AND YOU’VE BEEN LOSING SOME
AND YOU’VE BEEN LOSING SOME ALTITUDE.
ALTITUDE. SO ELIZABETH WARREN, DOES SHE
SO ELIZABETH WARREN, DOES SHE HAVE THE FORMULA, RATHER THAN
HAVE THE FORMULA, RATHER THAN YOU?
YOU? >> I’M NOT GOING -- WELL, YOU
>> I’M NOT GOING -- WELL, YOU HAVE TO ASK ELIZABETH WARREN.
HAVE TO ASK ELIZABETH WARREN. ELIZABETH IS A LONG --
ELIZABETH IS A LONG -- >> WHY DO YOU THINK SHE’S BEING
>> WHY DO YOU THINK SHE’S BEING SO SUCCESSFUL?
SO SUCCESSFUL? >> SOME OF THE POLLS HAVE ME
>> SOME OF THE POLLS HAVE ME DOING A LOT BETTER THAN LUZ
DOING A LOT BETTER THAN LUZ ELIZABETH WARREN.
ELIZABETH WARREN. POLLS, DEPENDING ON THE POLGZLS.
POLLS, DEPENDING ON THE POLGZLS. ONE POLLS I WOULD STRESS IS THE
ONE POLLS I WOULD STRESS IS THE LAST FIVE POLLS HAS US RUNNING
LAST FIVE POLLS HAS US RUNNING FAR BETTER THAN ANYONE ELSE
FAR BETTER THAN ANYONE ELSE SINCE BIDEN.
SINCE BIDEN. IN ONE POLL WE’RE RUNNING BETTER
IN ONE POLL WE’RE RUNNING BETTER THAN BIDEN.
THAN BIDEN. IF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE
IF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE LOOKING AT THE CANDIDATE WHO CAN
LOOKING AT THE CANDIDATE WHO CAN DEFEAT TRUMP, I’LL HOPE THEY’LL
DEFEAT TRUMP, I’LL HOPE THEY’LL GIVE SERIOUS CONSIDERATION TO
GIVE SERIOUS CONSIDERATION TO OUR CANDIDACY.
