CONSIDERING
CONSIDERING IMPLEMENTING
CONSIDERING IMPLEMENTING A
CONSIDERING IMPLEMENTING A
NEW
CONSIDERING IMPLEMENTING A
NEW RULE
CONSIDERING IMPLEMENTING A
NEW RULE THAT
CONSIDERING IMPLEMENTING A
NEW RULE THAT WOULD
CONSIDERING IMPLEMENTING A
NEW RULE THAT WOULD KICK
CONSIDERING IMPLEMENTING A
NEW RULE THAT WOULD KICK
MILLIONS
CONSIDERING IMPLEMENTING A
NEW RULE THAT WOULD KICK
MILLIONS OF
CONSIDERING IMPLEMENTING A
NEW RULE THAT WOULD KICK
MILLIONS OF AMERICANS
CONSIDERING IMPLEMENTING A
NEW RULE THAT WOULD KICK
MILLIONS OF AMERICANS OFF
NEW RULE THAT WOULD KICK
MILLIONS OF AMERICANS OFF
NEW RULE THAT WOULD KICK
MILLIONS OF AMERICANS OFF
SNAP
NEW RULE THAT WOULD KICK
MILLIONS OF AMERICANS OFF
SNAP --
NEW RULE THAT WOULD KICK
MILLIONS OF AMERICANS OFF
SNAP -- THE
NEW RULE THAT WOULD KICK
MILLIONS OF AMERICANS OFF
SNAP -- THE FOOD
NEW RULE THAT WOULD KICK
MILLIONS OF AMERICANS OFF
SNAP -- THE FOOD STAMP
NEW RULE THAT WOULD KICK
MILLIONS OF AMERICANS OFF
SNAP -- THE FOOD STAMP PROGRAM.
MILLIONS OF AMERICANS OFF
SNAP -- THE FOOD STAMP PROGRAM.
MILLIONS OF AMERICANS OFF
SNAP -- THE FOOD STAMP PROGRAM.
KVUE
MILLIONS OF AMERICANS OFF
SNAP -- THE FOOD STAMP PROGRAM.
KVUE POLITICAL
MILLIONS OF AMERICANS OFF
SNAP -- THE FOOD STAMP PROGRAM.
KVUE POLITICAL REPORTER
MILLIONS OF AMERICANS OFF
SNAP -- THE FOOD STAMP PROGRAM.
KVUE POLITICAL REPORTER ASHLEY
SNAP -- THE FOOD STAMP PROGRAM.
KVUE POLITICAL REPORTER ASHLEY
KVUE POLITICAL REPORTER ASHLEY
GOUDEAU
GOUDEAU IS
GOUDEAU IS HERE.
GOUDEAU IS HERE.
ASHLEY
GOUDEAU IS HERE.
ASHLEY --
GOUDEAU IS HERE.
ASHLEY -- THE
GOUDEAU IS HERE.
ASHLEY -- THE CHANGE
GOUDEAU IS HERE.
ASHLEY -- THE CHANGE WOULD
GOUDEAU IS HERE.
ASHLEY -- THE CHANGE WOULD
IMPACT
GOUDEAU IS HERE.
ASHLEY -- THE CHANGE WOULD
IMPACT STATE
GOUDEAU IS HERE.
ASHLEY -- THE CHANGE WOULD
IMPACT STATE RULES.
ASHLEY -- THE CHANGE WOULD
IMPACT STATE RULES.
IMPACT STATE RULES.
IMPACT STATE RULES.

MIKE
IMPACT STATE RULES.

MIKE AND
IMPACT STATE RULES.

MIKE AND QUITA
IMPACT STATE RULES.

MIKE AND QUITA --
IMPACT STATE RULES.

MIKE AND QUITA -- THE
IMPACT STATE RULES.

MIKE AND QUITA -- THE WAY
IMPACT STATE RULES.

MIKE AND QUITA -- THE WAY THE
MIKE AND QUITA -- THE WAY THE
MIKE AND QUITA -- THE WAY THE
SUPPLEMENTAL
MIKE AND QUITA -- THE WAY THE
SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION
MIKE AND QUITA -- THE WAY THE
SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION
ASSISTANCE
MIKE AND QUITA -- THE WAY THE
SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
MIKE AND QUITA -- THE WAY THE
SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM WORKS
MIKE AND QUITA -- THE WAY THE
SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM WORKS NOW
MIKE AND QUITA -- THE WAY THE
SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM WORKS NOW IS
SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM WORKS NOW IS
SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM WORKS NOW IS
THE
SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM WORKS NOW IS
THE FEDERAL
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM WORKS NOW IS
THE FEDERAL
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM WORKS NOW IS
THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM WORKS NOW IS
THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT SETS
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM WORKS NOW IS
THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT SETS BASE
THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT SETS BASE
THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT SETS BASE
REQUIREMENTS
THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT SETS BASE
REQUIREMENTS --
THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT SETS BASE
REQUIREMENTS -- OR
THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT SETS BASE
REQUIREMENTS -- OR THE
THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT SETS BASE
REQUIREMENTS -- OR THE FLOOR
GOVERNMENT SETS BASE
REQUIREMENTS -- OR THE FLOOR
GOVERNMENT SETS BASE
REQUIREMENTS -- OR THE FLOOR
--
GOVERNMENT SETS BASE
REQUIREMENTS -- OR THE FLOOR
-- ON
GOVERNMENT SETS BASE
REQUIREMENTS -- OR THE FLOOR
-- ON WHO'S
GOVERNMENT SETS BASE
REQUIREMENTS -- OR THE FLOOR
-- ON WHO'S ELIGIBLE
GOVERNMENT SETS BASE
REQUIREMENTS -- OR THE FLOOR
-- ON WHO'S ELIGIBLE FOR
GOVERNMENT SETS BASE
REQUIREMENTS -- OR THE FLOOR
-- ON WHO'S ELIGIBLE FOR AID.
REQUIREMENTS -- OR THE FLOOR
-- ON WHO'S ELIGIBLE FOR AID.
REQUIREMENTS -- OR THE FLOOR
-- ON WHO'S ELIGIBLE FOR AID.
AND
REQUIREMENTS -- OR THE FLOOR
-- ON WHO'S ELIGIBLE FOR AID.
AND EACH
REQUIREMENTS -- OR THE FLOOR
-- ON WHO'S ELIGIBLE FOR AID.
AND EACH STATE
REQUIREMENTS -- OR THE FLOOR
-- ON WHO'S ELIGIBLE FOR AID.
AND EACH STATE SETS
REQUIREMENTS -- OR THE FLOOR
-- ON WHO'S ELIGIBLE FOR AID.
AND EACH STATE SETS THE
REQUIREMENTS -- OR THE FLOOR
-- ON WHO'S ELIGIBLE FOR AID.
AND EACH STATE SETS THE CEILING
-- ON WHO'S ELIGIBLE FOR AID.
AND EACH STATE SETS THE CEILING
-- ON WHO'S ELIGIBLE FOR AID.
AND EACH STATE SETS THE CEILING
AND
-- ON WHO'S ELIGIBLE FOR AID.
AND EACH STATE SETS THE CEILING
AND DISTRIBUTES
AND EACH STATE SETS THE CEILING
AND DISTRIBUTES
AND EACH STATE SETS THE CEILING
AND DISTRIBUTES
THAT
AND EACH STATE SETS THE CEILING
AND DISTRIBUTES
THAT AID.
AND DISTRIBUTES
THAT AID.
THAT AID.
THAT AID.

TEXAS
THAT AID.

TEXAS HEALTH
THAT AID.

TEXAS HEALTH AND
THAT AID.

TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN
THAT AID.

TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
AND
TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
AND OTHER
TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
AND OTHER STATES
TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
AND OTHER STATES
SOMETIMES
TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
AND OTHER STATES
SOMETIMES DISTRIBUTE
TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
AND OTHER STATES
SOMETIMES DISTRIBUTE AID
TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
AND OTHER STATES
SOMETIMES DISTRIBUTE AID BASED
AND OTHER STATES
SOMETIMES DISTRIBUTE AID BASED
AND OTHER STATES
SOMETIMES DISTRIBUTE AID BASED
ON
AND OTHER STATES
SOMETIMES DISTRIBUTE AID BASED
ON SOMETHING
SOMETIMES DISTRIBUTE AID BASED
ON SOMETHING
SOMETIMES DISTRIBUTE AID BASED
ON SOMETHING
CALLED
SOMETIMES DISTRIBUTE AID BASED
ON SOMETHING
CALLED "CATEGORICAL
ON SOMETHING
CALLED "CATEGORICAL
ON SOMETHING
CALLED "CATEGORICAL
ELIGIBILITY."
CALLED "CATEGORICAL
ELIGIBILITY."
CALLED "CATEGORICAL
ELIGIBILITY."
MEANING
CALLED "CATEGORICAL
ELIGIBILITY."
MEANING IF
CALLED "CATEGORICAL
ELIGIBILITY."
MEANING IF PEOPLE
CALLED "CATEGORICAL
ELIGIBILITY."
MEANING IF PEOPLE ALREADY
ELIGIBILITY."
MEANING IF PEOPLE ALREADY
ELIGIBILITY."
MEANING IF PEOPLE ALREADY
QUALIFY
ELIGIBILITY."
MEANING IF PEOPLE ALREADY
QUALIFY FOR
MEANING IF PEOPLE ALREADY
QUALIFY FOR
MEANING IF PEOPLE ALREADY
QUALIFY FOR
SIMILAR
MEANING IF PEOPLE ALREADY
QUALIFY FOR
SIMILAR AID
MEANING IF PEOPLE ALREADY
QUALIFY FOR
SIMILAR AID PROGRAMS
MEANING IF PEOPLE ALREADY
QUALIFY FOR
SIMILAR AID PROGRAMS --
QUALIFY FOR
SIMILAR AID PROGRAMS --
QUALIFY FOR
SIMILAR AID PROGRAMS --
THEY
QUALIFY FOR
SIMILAR AID PROGRAMS --
THEY CAN
QUALIFY FOR
SIMILAR AID PROGRAMS --
THEY CAN GET
QUALIFY FOR
SIMILAR AID PROGRAMS --
THEY CAN GET FOOD
QUALIFY FOR
SIMILAR AID PROGRAMS --
THEY CAN GET FOOD STAMPS.
SIMILAR AID PROGRAMS --
THEY CAN GET FOOD STAMPS.
SIMILAR AID PROGRAMS --
THEY CAN GET FOOD STAMPS.
THE
SIMILAR AID PROGRAMS --
THEY CAN GET FOOD STAMPS.
THE U-S-D-A
SIMILAR AID PROGRAMS --
THEY CAN GET FOOD STAMPS.
THE U-S-D-A --
SIMILAR AID PROGRAMS --
THEY CAN GET FOOD STAMPS.
THE U-S-D-A -- WHICH
SIMILAR AID PROGRAMS --
THEY CAN GET FOOD STAMPS.
THE U-S-D-A -- WHICH OVERSEES
THEY CAN GET FOOD STAMPS.
THE U-S-D-A -- WHICH OVERSEES
THEY CAN GET FOOD STAMPS.
THE U-S-D-A -- WHICH OVERSEES
SNAP
THEY CAN GET FOOD STAMPS.
THE U-S-D-A -- WHICH OVERSEES
SNAP --
THEY CAN GET FOOD STAMPS.
THE U-S-D-A -- WHICH OVERSEES
SNAP -- SEES
THEY CAN GET FOOD STAMPS.
THE U-S-D-A -- WHICH OVERSEES
SNAP -- SEES THIS
THEY CAN GET FOOD STAMPS.
THE U-S-D-A -- WHICH OVERSEES
SNAP -- SEES THIS AS
THEY CAN GET FOOD STAMPS.
THE U-S-D-A -- WHICH OVERSEES
SNAP -- SEES THIS AS A
THE U-S-D-A -- WHICH OVERSEES
SNAP -- SEES THIS AS A
THE U-S-D-A -- WHICH OVERSEES
SNAP -- SEES THIS AS A
LOOPHOLE.
SNAP -- SEES THIS AS A
LOOPHOLE.
SNAP -- SEES THIS AS A
LOOPHOLE.
CITING
SNAP -- SEES THIS AS A
LOOPHOLE.
CITING SOME
SNAP -- SEES THIS AS A
LOOPHOLE.
CITING SOME PEOPLE
SNAP -- SEES THIS AS A
LOOPHOLE.
CITING SOME PEOPLE GET
SNAP -- SEES THIS AS A
LOOPHOLE.
CITING SOME PEOPLE GET VERY
LOOPHOLE.
CITING SOME PEOPLE GET VERY
LOOPHOLE.
CITING SOME PEOPLE GET VERY
LITTLE
LOOPHOLE.
CITING SOME PEOPLE GET VERY
LITTLE AND
LOOPHOLE.
CITING SOME PEOPLE GET VERY
LITTLE AND EVEN
LOOPHOLE.
CITING SOME PEOPLE GET VERY
LITTLE AND EVEN NON-CASH
CITING SOME PEOPLE GET VERY
LITTLE AND EVEN NON-CASH
CITING SOME PEOPLE GET VERY
LITTLE AND EVEN NON-CASH
FORMS
CITING SOME PEOPLE GET VERY
LITTLE AND EVEN NON-CASH
FORMS OF
CITING SOME PEOPLE GET VERY
LITTLE AND EVEN NON-CASH
FORMS OF OTHER
CITING SOME PEOPLE GET VERY
LITTLE AND EVEN NON-CASH
FORMS OF OTHER AID
CITING SOME PEOPLE GET VERY
LITTLE AND EVEN NON-CASH
FORMS OF OTHER AID --
CITING SOME PEOPLE GET VERY
LITTLE AND EVEN NON-CASH
FORMS OF OTHER AID -- BUT
CITING SOME PEOPLE GET VERY
LITTLE AND EVEN NON-CASH
FORMS OF OTHER AID -- BUT ARE
LITTLE AND EVEN NON-CASH
FORMS OF OTHER AID -- BUT ARE
LITTLE AND EVEN NON-CASH
FORMS OF OTHER AID -- BUT ARE
STILL
LITTLE AND EVEN NON-CASH
FORMS OF OTHER AID -- BUT ARE
STILL ELIGIBLE
LITTLE AND EVEN NON-CASH
FORMS OF OTHER AID -- BUT ARE
STILL ELIGIBLE FOR
FORMS OF OTHER AID -- BUT ARE
STILL ELIGIBLE FOR
FORMS OF OTHER AID -- BUT ARE
STILL ELIGIBLE FOR
FOOD
FORMS OF OTHER AID -- BUT ARE
STILL ELIGIBLE FOR
FOOD STAMPS.
STILL ELIGIBLE FOR
FOOD STAMPS.
FOOD STAMPS.
FOOD STAMPS.

SO
FOOD STAMPS.

SO THE
FOOD STAMPS.

SO THE PROPOSED
FOOD STAMPS.

SO THE PROPOSED CHANGES
FOOD STAMPS.

SO THE PROPOSED CHANGES GET
FOOD STAMPS.

SO THE PROPOSED CHANGES GET RID
SO THE PROPOSED CHANGES GET RID
SO THE PROPOSED CHANGES GET RID
OF
SO THE PROPOSED CHANGES GET RID
OF STATE
SO THE PROPOSED CHANGES GET RID
OF STATE
CEILINGS
SO THE PROPOSED CHANGES GET RID
OF STATE
CEILINGS AND
SO THE PROPOSED CHANGES GET RID
OF STATE
CEILINGS AND SETS
SO THE PROPOSED CHANGES GET RID
OF STATE
CEILINGS AND SETS UNIVERSAL
OF STATE
CEILINGS AND SETS UNIVERSAL
OF STATE
CEILINGS AND SETS UNIVERSAL
RULES.
CEILINGS AND SETS UNIVERSAL
RULES.
CEILINGS AND SETS UNIVERSAL
RULES.
HERE'S
CEILINGS AND SETS UNIVERSAL
RULES.
HERE'S HOW
CEILINGS AND SETS UNIVERSAL
RULES.
HERE'S HOW THEY
CEILINGS AND SETS UNIVERSAL
RULES.
HERE'S HOW THEY COMPARE
CEILINGS AND SETS UNIVERSAL
RULES.
HERE'S HOW THEY COMPARE TO
CEILINGS AND SETS UNIVERSAL
RULES.
HERE'S HOW THEY COMPARE TO WHAT
RULES.
HERE'S HOW THEY COMPARE TO WHAT
RULES.
HERE'S HOW THEY COMPARE TO WHAT
TEXAS
RULES.
HERE'S HOW THEY COMPARE TO WHAT
TEXAS CURRENTLY
HERE'S HOW THEY COMPARE TO WHAT
TEXAS CURRENTLY
HERE'S HOW THEY COMPARE TO WHAT
TEXAS CURRENTLY
ALLOWS.
TEXAS CURRENTLY
ALLOWS.
TEXAS CURRENTLY
ALLOWS.
THE
TEXAS CURRENTLY
ALLOWS.
THE STATE
TEXAS CURRENTLY
ALLOWS.
THE STATE QUALIFIES
TEXAS CURRENTLY
ALLOWS.
THE STATE QUALIFIES FAMILIES
TEXAS CURRENTLY
ALLOWS.
THE STATE QUALIFIES FAMILIES FOR
ALLOWS.
THE STATE QUALIFIES FAMILIES FOR
ALLOWS.
THE STATE QUALIFIES FAMILIES FOR
FOOD
ALLOWS.
THE STATE QUALIFIES FAMILIES FOR
FOOD STAMPS
ALLOWS.
THE STATE QUALIFIES FAMILIES FOR
FOOD STAMPS IF
THE STATE QUALIFIES FAMILIES FOR
FOOD STAMPS IF
THE STATE QUALIFIES FAMILIES FOR
FOOD STAMPS IF
THEIR
THE STATE QUALIFIES FAMILIES FOR
FOOD STAMPS IF
THEIR INCOME
THE STATE QUALIFIES FAMILIES FOR
FOOD STAMPS IF
THEIR INCOME IS
THE STATE QUALIFIES FAMILIES FOR
FOOD STAMPS IF
THEIR INCOME IS UP
THE STATE QUALIFIES FAMILIES FOR
FOOD STAMPS IF
THEIR INCOME IS UP TO
THE STATE QUALIFIES FAMILIES FOR
FOOD STAMPS IF
THEIR INCOME IS UP TO 165-
FOOD STAMPS IF
THEIR INCOME IS UP TO 165-
FOOD STAMPS IF
THEIR INCOME IS UP TO 165-
PERCENT
FOOD STAMPS IF
THEIR INCOME IS UP TO 165-
PERCENT OF
FOOD STAMPS IF
THEIR INCOME IS UP TO 165-
PERCENT OF THE
FOOD STAMPS IF
THEIR INCOME IS UP TO 165-
PERCENT OF THE POVERTY
FOOD STAMPS IF
THEIR INCOME IS UP TO 165-
PERCENT OF THE POVERTY LINE.
THEIR INCOME IS UP TO 165-
PERCENT OF THE POVERTY LINE.
THEIR INCOME IS UP TO 165-
PERCENT OF THE POVERTY LINE.
THE
THEIR INCOME IS UP TO 165-
PERCENT OF THE POVERTY LINE.
THE U-S-D-A
THEIR INCOME IS UP TO 165-
PERCENT OF THE POVERTY LINE.
THE U-S-D-A WANTS
THEIR INCOME IS UP TO 165-
PERCENT OF THE POVERTY LINE.
THE U-S-D-A WANTS TO
THEIR INCOME IS UP TO 165-
PERCENT OF THE POVERTY LINE.
THE U-S-D-A WANTS TO DROP
THEIR INCOME IS UP TO 165-
PERCENT OF THE POVERTY LINE.
THE U-S-D-A WANTS TO DROP THAT
PERCENT OF THE POVERTY LINE.
THE U-S-D-A WANTS TO DROP THAT
PERCENT OF THE POVERTY LINE.
THE U-S-D-A WANTS TO DROP THAT
TO
PERCENT OF THE POVERTY LINE.
THE U-S-D-A WANTS TO DROP THAT
TO 130-PERCENT.
THE U-S-D-A WANTS TO DROP THAT
TO 130-PERCENT.
THE U-S-D-A WANTS TO DROP THAT
TO 130-PERCENT.
AND
THE U-S-D-A WANTS TO DROP THAT
TO 130-PERCENT.
AND DECREASE
THE U-S-D-A WANTS TO DROP THAT
TO 130-PERCENT.
AND DECREASE HOW
THE U-S-D-A WANTS TO DROP THAT
TO 130-PERCENT.
AND DECREASE HOW MUCH
THE U-S-D-A WANTS TO DROP THAT
TO 130-PERCENT.
AND DECREASE HOW MUCH YOU
THE U-S-D-A WANTS TO DROP THAT
TO 130-PERCENT.
AND DECREASE HOW MUCH YOU CAN
TO 130-PERCENT.
AND DECREASE HOW MUCH YOU CAN
TO 130-PERCENT.
AND DECREASE HOW MUCH YOU CAN
HAVE
TO 130-PERCENT.
AND DECREASE HOW MUCH YOU CAN
HAVE IN
TO 130-PERCENT.
AND DECREASE HOW MUCH YOU CAN
HAVE IN ASSETS.
AND DECREASE HOW MUCH YOU CAN
HAVE IN ASSETS.
AND DECREASE HOW MUCH YOU CAN
HAVE IN ASSETS.
THE
AND DECREASE HOW MUCH YOU CAN
HAVE IN ASSETS.
THE BIG
AND DECREASE HOW MUCH YOU CAN
HAVE IN ASSETS.
THE BIG CHANGE
AND DECREASE HOW MUCH YOU CAN
HAVE IN ASSETS.
THE BIG CHANGE HERE
AND DECREASE HOW MUCH YOU CAN
HAVE IN ASSETS.
THE BIG CHANGE HERE --
AND DECREASE HOW MUCH YOU CAN
HAVE IN ASSETS.
THE BIG CHANGE HERE -- IN
AND DECREASE HOW MUCH YOU CAN
HAVE IN ASSETS.
THE BIG CHANGE HERE -- IN TEXAS
HAVE IN ASSETS.
THE BIG CHANGE HERE -- IN TEXAS
HAVE IN ASSETS.
THE BIG CHANGE HERE -- IN TEXAS
YOU
HAVE IN ASSETS.
THE BIG CHANGE HERE -- IN TEXAS
YOU CAN
HAVE IN ASSETS.
THE BIG CHANGE HERE -- IN TEXAS
YOU CAN HAVE
HAVE IN ASSETS.
THE BIG CHANGE HERE -- IN TEXAS
YOU CAN HAVE A
THE BIG CHANGE HERE -- IN TEXAS
YOU CAN HAVE A
THE BIG CHANGE HERE -- IN TEXAS
YOU CAN HAVE A
VEHICLE
THE BIG CHANGE HERE -- IN TEXAS
YOU CAN HAVE A
VEHICLE WORTH
THE BIG CHANGE HERE -- IN TEXAS
YOU CAN HAVE A
VEHICLE WORTH UP
THE BIG CHANGE HERE -- IN TEXAS
YOU CAN HAVE A
VEHICLE WORTH UP TO
THE BIG CHANGE HERE -- IN TEXAS
YOU CAN HAVE A
VEHICLE WORTH UP TO 15-
THE BIG CHANGE HERE -- IN TEXAS
YOU CAN HAVE A
VEHICLE WORTH UP TO 15- THOUSAND
YOU CAN HAVE A
VEHICLE WORTH UP TO 15- THOUSAND
YOU CAN HAVE A
VEHICLE WORTH UP TO 15- THOUSAND
DOLLARS
YOU CAN HAVE A
VEHICLE WORTH UP TO 15- THOUSAND
DOLLARS AND
VEHICLE WORTH UP TO 15- THOUSAND
DOLLARS AND
VEHICLE WORTH UP TO 15- THOUSAND
DOLLARS AND
STILL
VEHICLE WORTH UP TO 15- THOUSAND
DOLLARS AND
STILL GET
VEHICLE WORTH UP TO 15- THOUSAND
DOLLARS AND
STILL GET SNAP
VEHICLE WORTH UP TO 15- THOUSAND
DOLLARS AND
STILL GET SNAP BENEFITS.
DOLLARS AND
STILL GET SNAP BENEFITS.
DOLLARS AND
STILL GET SNAP BENEFITS.
THE
DOLLARS AND
STILL GET SNAP BENEFITS.
THE FEDERAL
DOLLARS AND
STILL GET SNAP BENEFITS.
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
DOLLARS AND
STILL GET SNAP BENEFITS.
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WANTS
DOLLARS AND
STILL GET SNAP BENEFITS.
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WANTS TO
STILL GET SNAP BENEFITS.
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WANTS TO
STILL GET SNAP BENEFITS.
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WANTS TO
DECREASE
STILL GET SNAP BENEFITS.
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WANTS TO
DECREASE THAT
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WANTS TO
DECREASE THAT
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WANTS TO
DECREASE THAT
TO
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WANTS TO
DECREASE THAT
TO 4-THOUSAND
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WANTS TO
DECREASE THAT
TO 4-THOUSAND 650-DOLLARS.
DECREASE THAT
TO 4-THOUSAND 650-DOLLARS.
TO 4-THOUSAND 650-DOLLARS.
TO 4-THOUSAND 650-DOLLARS.

"I
TO 4-THOUSAND 650-DOLLARS.

"I THINK
TO 4-THOUSAND 650-DOLLARS.

"I THINK THAT'S
TO 4-THOUSAND 650-DOLLARS.

"I THINK THAT'S HUGE
TO 4-THOUSAND 650-DOLLARS.

"I THINK THAT'S HUGE IN
TO 4-THOUSAND 650-DOLLARS.

"I THINK THAT'S HUGE IN A
TO 4-THOUSAND 650-DOLLARS.

"I THINK THAT'S HUGE IN A STATE
"I THINK THAT'S HUGE IN A STATE
"I THINK THAT'S HUGE IN A STATE
WHERE
"I THINK THAT'S HUGE IN A STATE
WHERE PUBLIC
"I THINK THAT'S HUGE IN A STATE
WHERE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
"I THINK THAT'S HUGE IN A STATE
WHERE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
IS
"I THINK THAT'S HUGE IN A STATE
WHERE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
IS JUST
"I THINK THAT'S HUGE IN A STATE
WHERE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
IS JUST NOT
"I THINK THAT'S HUGE IN A STATE
WHERE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
IS JUST NOT A
"I THINK THAT'S HUGE IN A STATE
WHERE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
IS JUST NOT A REALITY
"I THINK THAT'S HUGE IN A STATE
WHERE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
IS JUST NOT A REALITY FOR
"I THINK THAT'S HUGE IN A STATE
WHERE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
IS JUST NOT A REALITY FOR MOST
WHERE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
IS JUST NOT A REALITY FOR MOST
WHERE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
IS JUST NOT A REALITY FOR MOST
PEOPLE,
WHERE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
IS JUST NOT A REALITY FOR MOST
PEOPLE, EVEN
WHERE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
IS JUST NOT A REALITY FOR MOST
PEOPLE, EVEN IN
WHERE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
IS JUST NOT A REALITY FOR MOST
PEOPLE, EVEN IN AUSTIN.
WHERE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
IS JUST NOT A REALITY FOR MOST
PEOPLE, EVEN IN AUSTIN. MOST
IS JUST NOT A REALITY FOR MOST
PEOPLE, EVEN IN AUSTIN. MOST
IS JUST NOT A REALITY FOR MOST
PEOPLE, EVEN IN AUSTIN. MOST
PEOPLE
IS JUST NOT A REALITY FOR MOST
PEOPLE, EVEN IN AUSTIN. MOST
PEOPLE STILL
IS JUST NOT A REALITY FOR MOST
PEOPLE, EVEN IN AUSTIN. MOST
PEOPLE STILL HAVE
IS JUST NOT A REALITY FOR MOST
PEOPLE, EVEN IN AUSTIN. MOST
PEOPLE STILL HAVE TO
IS JUST NOT A REALITY FOR MOST
PEOPLE, EVEN IN AUSTIN. MOST
PEOPLE STILL HAVE TO DRIVE
IS JUST NOT A REALITY FOR MOST
PEOPLE, EVEN IN AUSTIN. MOST
PEOPLE STILL HAVE TO DRIVE TO
PEOPLE, EVEN IN AUSTIN. MOST
PEOPLE STILL HAVE TO DRIVE TO
PEOPLE, EVEN IN AUSTIN. MOST
PEOPLE STILL HAVE TO DRIVE TO
GET
PEOPLE, EVEN IN AUSTIN. MOST
PEOPLE STILL HAVE TO DRIVE TO
GET TO
PEOPLE, EVEN IN AUSTIN. MOST
PEOPLE STILL HAVE TO DRIVE TO
GET TO WORK
PEOPLE, EVEN IN AUSTIN. MOST
PEOPLE STILL HAVE TO DRIVE TO
GET TO WORK AND
PEOPLE, EVEN IN AUSTIN. MOST
PEOPLE STILL HAVE TO DRIVE TO
GET TO WORK AND YOU
PEOPLE, EVEN IN AUSTIN. MOST
PEOPLE STILL HAVE TO DRIVE TO
GET TO WORK AND YOU HAVE
PEOPLE, EVEN IN AUSTIN. MOST
PEOPLE STILL HAVE TO DRIVE TO
GET TO WORK AND YOU HAVE TO
PEOPLE, EVEN IN AUSTIN. MOST
PEOPLE STILL HAVE TO DRIVE TO
GET TO WORK AND YOU HAVE TO WORK
PEOPLE STILL HAVE TO DRIVE TO
GET TO WORK AND YOU HAVE TO WORK
PEOPLE STILL HAVE TO DRIVE TO
GET TO WORK AND YOU HAVE TO WORK
TO
GET TO WORK AND YOU HAVE TO WORK
TO
GET TO WORK AND YOU HAVE TO WORK
TO
STAY
GET TO WORK AND YOU HAVE TO WORK
TO
STAY ON
GET TO WORK AND YOU HAVE TO WORK
TO
STAY ON SNAP.
GET TO WORK AND YOU HAVE TO WORK
TO
STAY ON SNAP. YOU
GET TO WORK AND YOU HAVE TO WORK
TO
STAY ON SNAP. YOU HAVE
GET TO WORK AND YOU HAVE TO WORK
TO
STAY ON SNAP. YOU HAVE TO
GET TO WORK AND YOU HAVE TO WORK
TO
STAY ON SNAP. YOU HAVE TO WORK
TO
STAY ON SNAP. YOU HAVE TO WORK
TO
STAY ON SNAP. YOU HAVE TO WORK
AT
TO
STAY ON SNAP. YOU HAVE TO WORK
AT LEAST
TO
STAY ON SNAP. YOU HAVE TO WORK
AT LEAST 30
TO
STAY ON SNAP. YOU HAVE TO WORK
AT LEAST 30 HOURS
TO
STAY ON SNAP. YOU HAVE TO WORK
AT LEAST 30 HOURS A
TO
STAY ON SNAP. YOU HAVE TO WORK
AT LEAST 30 HOURS A WEEK
TO
STAY ON SNAP. YOU HAVE TO WORK
AT LEAST 30 HOURS A WEEK TO
TO
STAY ON SNAP. YOU HAVE TO WORK
AT LEAST 30 HOURS A WEEK TO KEEP
STAY ON SNAP. YOU HAVE TO WORK
AT LEAST 30 HOURS A WEEK TO KEEP
STAY ON SNAP. YOU HAVE TO WORK
AT LEAST 30 HOURS A WEEK TO KEEP
YOUR
STAY ON SNAP. YOU HAVE TO WORK
AT LEAST 30 HOURS A WEEK TO KEEP
YOUR BENEFITS.
STAY ON SNAP. YOU HAVE TO WORK
AT LEAST 30 HOURS A WEEK TO KEEP
YOUR BENEFITS. BUT
STAY ON SNAP. YOU HAVE TO WORK
AT LEAST 30 HOURS A WEEK TO KEEP
YOUR BENEFITS. BUT IF
STAY ON SNAP. YOU HAVE TO WORK
AT LEAST 30 HOURS A WEEK TO KEEP
YOUR BENEFITS. BUT IF YOU
STAY ON SNAP. YOU HAVE TO WORK
AT LEAST 30 HOURS A WEEK TO KEEP
YOUR BENEFITS. BUT IF YOU CAN'T
AT LEAST 30 HOURS A WEEK TO KEEP
YOUR BENEFITS. BUT IF YOU CAN'T
AT LEAST 30 HOURS A WEEK TO KEEP
YOUR BENEFITS. BUT IF YOU CAN'T
HAVE
AT LEAST 30 HOURS A WEEK TO KEEP
YOUR BENEFITS. BUT IF YOU CAN'T
HAVE A
AT LEAST 30 HOURS A WEEK TO KEEP
YOUR BENEFITS. BUT IF YOU CAN'T
HAVE A CAR
AT LEAST 30 HOURS A WEEK TO KEEP
YOUR BENEFITS. BUT IF YOU CAN'T
HAVE A CAR THAT'S
AT LEAST 30 HOURS A WEEK TO KEEP
YOUR BENEFITS. BUT IF YOU CAN'T
HAVE A CAR THAT'S WORTH
AT LEAST 30 HOURS A WEEK TO KEEP
YOUR BENEFITS. BUT IF YOU CAN'T
HAVE A CAR THAT'S WORTH MORE
YOUR BENEFITS. BUT IF YOU CAN'T
HAVE A CAR THAT'S WORTH MORE
YOUR BENEFITS. BUT IF YOU CAN'T
HAVE A CAR THAT'S WORTH MORE
THAN
HAVE A CAR THAT'S WORTH MORE
THAN
THAN
$4,650,
$4,650, YOU'RE
$4,650, YOU'RE GOING
$4,650, YOU'RE GOING TO
$4,650, YOU'RE GOING TO GET
$4,650, YOU'RE GOING TO GET
STRANDED
$4,650, YOU'RE GOING TO GET
STRANDED ON
$4,650, YOU'RE GOING TO GET
STRANDED ON THE
$4,650, YOU'RE GOING TO GET
STRANDED ON THE SIDE
$4,650, YOU'RE GOING TO GET
STRANDED ON THE SIDE OF
$4,650, YOU'RE GOING TO GET
STRANDED ON THE SIDE OF THE
$4,650, YOU'RE GOING TO GET
STRANDED ON THE SIDE OF THE
ROAD."
STRANDED ON THE SIDE OF THE
ROAD."
STRANDED ON THE SIDE OF THE
ROAD."
RACHEL
STRANDED ON THE SIDE OF THE
ROAD."
RACHEL COOPER
STRANDED ON THE SIDE OF THE
ROAD."
RACHEL COOPER IS
STRANDED ON THE SIDE OF THE
ROAD."
RACHEL COOPER IS A
STRANDED ON THE SIDE OF THE
ROAD."
RACHEL COOPER IS A SENIOR
STRANDED ON THE SIDE OF THE
ROAD."
RACHEL COOPER IS A SENIOR POLICY
ROAD."
RACHEL COOPER IS A SENIOR POLICY
ROAD."
RACHEL COOPER IS A SENIOR POLICY
ANALYSTS
ROAD."
RACHEL COOPER IS A SENIOR POLICY
ANALYSTS FOR
RACHEL COOPER IS A SENIOR POLICY
ANALYSTS FOR
RACHEL COOPER IS A SENIOR POLICY
ANALYSTS FOR
THE
RACHEL COOPER IS A SENIOR POLICY
ANALYSTS FOR
THE CENTER
RACHEL COOPER IS A SENIOR POLICY
ANALYSTS FOR
THE CENTER FOR
RACHEL COOPER IS A SENIOR POLICY
ANALYSTS FOR
THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC
RACHEL COOPER IS A SENIOR POLICY
ANALYSTS FOR
THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY
ANALYSTS FOR
THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY
ANALYSTS FOR
THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY
PRIORITIES.
THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY
PRIORITIES.
THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY
PRIORITIES.
SHE
THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY
PRIORITIES.
SHE SAYS
THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY
PRIORITIES.
SHE SAYS THE
THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY
PRIORITIES.
SHE SAYS THE NEW
THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY
PRIORITIES.
SHE SAYS THE NEW RULE
THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY
PRIORITIES.
SHE SAYS THE NEW RULE COULD
THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY
PRIORITIES.
SHE SAYS THE NEW RULE COULD ALSO
PRIORITIES.
SHE SAYS THE NEW RULE COULD ALSO
PRIORITIES.
SHE SAYS THE NEW RULE COULD ALSO
HAVE
PRIORITIES.
SHE SAYS THE NEW RULE COULD ALSO
HAVE BIG
SHE SAYS THE NEW RULE COULD ALSO
HAVE BIG
SHE SAYS THE NEW RULE COULD ALSO
HAVE BIG
IMPACTS
SHE SAYS THE NEW RULE COULD ALSO
HAVE BIG
IMPACTS ON
SHE SAYS THE NEW RULE COULD ALSO
HAVE BIG
IMPACTS ON AUSTIN
SHE SAYS THE NEW RULE COULD ALSO
HAVE BIG
IMPACTS ON AUSTIN I-S-D.
HAVE BIG
IMPACTS ON AUSTIN I-S-D.
HAVE BIG
IMPACTS ON AUSTIN I-S-D.
CHILDREN
HAVE BIG
IMPACTS ON AUSTIN I-S-D.
CHILDREN ON
HAVE BIG
IMPACTS ON AUSTIN I-S-D.
CHILDREN ON SNAP
HAVE BIG
IMPACTS ON AUSTIN I-S-D.
CHILDREN ON SNAP AUTOMATICALLY
IMPACTS ON AUSTIN I-S-D.
CHILDREN ON SNAP AUTOMATICALLY
IMPACTS ON AUSTIN I-S-D.
CHILDREN ON SNAP AUTOMATICALLY
GET
IMPACTS ON AUSTIN I-S-D.
CHILDREN ON SNAP AUTOMATICALLY
GET FREE
CHILDREN ON SNAP AUTOMATICALLY
GET FREE
CHILDREN ON SNAP AUTOMATICALLY
GET FREE
SCHOOL
CHILDREN ON SNAP AUTOMATICALLY
GET FREE
SCHOOL MEALS.
GET FREE
SCHOOL MEALS.
GET FREE
SCHOOL MEALS.
AND
GET FREE
SCHOOL MEALS.
AND IF
GET FREE
SCHOOL MEALS.
AND IF HALF
GET FREE
SCHOOL MEALS.
AND IF HALF OF
GET FREE
SCHOOL MEALS.
AND IF HALF OF THE
GET FREE
SCHOOL MEALS.
AND IF HALF OF THE STUDENTS
GET FREE
SCHOOL MEALS.
AND IF HALF OF THE STUDENTS ON
GET FREE
SCHOOL MEALS.
AND IF HALF OF THE STUDENTS ON A
SCHOOL MEALS.
AND IF HALF OF THE STUDENTS ON A
SCHOOL MEALS.
AND IF HALF OF THE STUDENTS ON A
CAMPUS
SCHOOL MEALS.
AND IF HALF OF THE STUDENTS ON A
CAMPUS ARE
SCHOOL MEALS.
AND IF HALF OF THE STUDENTS ON A
CAMPUS ARE ON
SCHOOL MEALS.
AND IF HALF OF THE STUDENTS ON A
CAMPUS ARE ON SNAP
SCHOOL MEALS.
AND IF HALF OF THE STUDENTS ON A
CAMPUS ARE ON SNAP --
AND IF HALF OF THE STUDENTS ON A
CAMPUS ARE ON SNAP --
AND IF HALF OF THE STUDENTS ON A
CAMPUS ARE ON SNAP --
THE
AND IF HALF OF THE STUDENTS ON A
CAMPUS ARE ON SNAP --
THE DISTRICT
AND IF HALF OF THE STUDENTS ON A
CAMPUS ARE ON SNAP --
THE DISTRICT CAN
AND IF HALF OF THE STUDENTS ON A
CAMPUS ARE ON SNAP --
THE DISTRICT CAN FEED
AND IF HALF OF THE STUDENTS ON A
CAMPUS ARE ON SNAP --
THE DISTRICT CAN FEED ALL
AND IF HALF OF THE STUDENTS ON A
CAMPUS ARE ON SNAP --
THE DISTRICT CAN FEED ALL THE
CAMPUS ARE ON SNAP --
THE DISTRICT CAN FEED ALL THE
CAMPUS ARE ON SNAP --
THE DISTRICT CAN FEED ALL THE
CHILDREN
CAMPUS ARE ON SNAP --
THE DISTRICT CAN FEED ALL THE
CHILDREN AT
CAMPUS ARE ON SNAP --
THE DISTRICT CAN FEED ALL THE
CHILDREN AT THAT
CAMPUS ARE ON SNAP --
THE DISTRICT CAN FEED ALL THE
CHILDREN AT THAT SCHOOL
THE DISTRICT CAN FEED ALL THE
CHILDREN AT THAT SCHOOL
THE DISTRICT CAN FEED ALL THE
CHILDREN AT THAT SCHOOL
FOR
THE DISTRICT CAN FEED ALL THE
CHILDREN AT THAT SCHOOL
FOR FREE.
CHILDREN AT THAT SCHOOL
FOR FREE.
CHILDREN AT THAT SCHOOL
FOR FREE.
THAT
CHILDREN AT THAT SCHOOL
FOR FREE.
THAT BENEFIT
CHILDREN AT THAT SCHOOL
FOR FREE.
THAT BENEFIT COULD
CHILDREN AT THAT SCHOOL
FOR FREE.
THAT BENEFIT COULD BE
CHILDREN AT THAT SCHOOL
FOR FREE.
THAT BENEFIT COULD BE LOST
CHILDREN AT THAT SCHOOL
FOR FREE.
THAT BENEFIT COULD BE LOST IF
FOR FREE.
THAT BENEFIT COULD BE LOST IF
FOR FREE.
THAT BENEFIT COULD BE LOST IF
FAMILIES
FOR FREE.
THAT BENEFIT COULD BE LOST IF
FAMILIES ARE
FOR FREE.
THAT BENEFIT COULD BE LOST IF
FAMILIES ARE KICKED
FOR FREE.
THAT BENEFIT COULD BE LOST IF
FAMILIES ARE KICKED OFF
FOR FREE.
THAT BENEFIT COULD BE LOST IF
FAMILIES ARE KICKED OFF THE
THAT BENEFIT COULD BE LOST IF
FAMILIES ARE KICKED OFF THE
THAT BENEFIT COULD BE LOST IF
FAMILIES ARE KICKED OFF THE
PROGRAM.
FAMILIES ARE KICKED OFF THE
PROGRAM.
PROGRAM.
PROGRAM.

THE
PROGRAM.

THE U-S-D-A
PROGRAM.

THE U-S-D-A ESTIMATES
PROGRAM.

THE U-S-D-A ESTIMATES 3-
PROGRAM.

THE U-S-D-A ESTIMATES 3- POINT-1
THE U-S-D-A ESTIMATES 3- POINT-1
THE U-S-D-A ESTIMATES 3- POINT-1
MILLION
THE U-S-D-A ESTIMATES 3- POINT-1
MILLION AMERICANS
THE U-S-D-A ESTIMATES 3- POINT-1
MILLION AMERICANS
COULD
THE U-S-D-A ESTIMATES 3- POINT-1
MILLION AMERICANS
COULD BE
THE U-S-D-A ESTIMATES 3- POINT-1
MILLION AMERICANS
COULD BE KICKED
THE U-S-D-A ESTIMATES 3- POINT-1
MILLION AMERICANS
COULD BE KICKED OFF.
MILLION AMERICANS
COULD BE KICKED OFF.
MILLION AMERICANS
COULD BE KICKED OFF.
THAT
MILLION AMERICANS
COULD BE KICKED OFF.
THAT INCLUDES
MILLION AMERICANS
COULD BE KICKED OFF.
THAT INCLUDES 300-THOUSAND
COULD BE KICKED OFF.
THAT INCLUDES 300-THOUSAND
COULD BE KICKED OFF.
THAT INCLUDES 300-THOUSAND
TEXANS.
THAT INCLUDES 300-THOUSAND
TEXANS.
THAT INCLUDES 300-THOUSAND
TEXANS.
RIGHT
THAT INCLUDES 300-THOUSAND
TEXANS.
RIGHT NOW
THAT INCLUDES 300-THOUSAND
TEXANS.
RIGHT NOW THEY'RE
THAT INCLUDES 300-THOUSAND
TEXANS.
RIGHT NOW THEY'RE ACCEPTING
TEXANS.
RIGHT NOW THEY'RE ACCEPTING
TEXANS.
RIGHT NOW THEY'RE ACCEPTING
PUBLIC
RIGHT NOW THEY'RE ACCEPTING
PUBLIC
RIGHT NOW THEY'RE ACCEPTING
PUBLIC
COMMENTS
RIGHT NOW THEY'RE ACCEPTING
PUBLIC
COMMENTS ON
RIGHT NOW THEY'RE ACCEPTING
PUBLIC
COMMENTS ON THE
RIGHT NOW THEY'RE ACCEPTING
PUBLIC
COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED
RIGHT NOW THEY'RE ACCEPTING
PUBLIC
COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED RULE
RIGHT NOW THEY'RE ACCEPTING
PUBLIC
COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED RULE --
PUBLIC
COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED RULE --
PUBLIC
COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED RULE --
AND
PUBLIC
COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED RULE --
AND THE
PUBLIC
COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED RULE --
AND THE AGENCY
PUBLIC
COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED RULE --
AND THE AGENCY COULD
COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED RULE --
AND THE AGENCY COULD
COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED RULE --
AND THE AGENCY COULD
MAKE
COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED RULE --
AND THE AGENCY COULD
MAKE A
COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED RULE --
AND THE AGENCY COULD
MAKE A FINAL
COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED RULE --
AND THE AGENCY COULD
MAKE A FINAL DECISION
