EFFORT, AGAIN, AS THEY TRIED TO
REMOVE THE PRESIDENT.
JOINING US NOW IS SIDNEY POWELL,
TERRIFIC AMERICAN, ALSO GENERAL
FLYNN’S ATTORNEY, AND WE ARE
DELIGHTED TO HAVE YOU WITH US.
I CAN ONLY IMAGINE WHEN YOU GOT
THAT RULING BY THIS COURT,
BUT -- WHAT YOUR FACE MUST HAVE
LOOK LOOKED LIKE, SIDNEY.
I THINK MOST AMERICANS ARE
FURIOUS AT WHAT THEY NOW SEE AS
JUDICIAL CORRUPTION.
THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS.
YOUR THOUGHTS.
>> WELL, THEY CERTAINLY ARE
GETTING AN EDUCATION OF WHAT HAS
BECOME OF OUR FEDERAL JUDICIARY,
LOU.
CALL THIS MICHAEL FLYNN
EXCEPTION TO THE RULE OF LAW.
THE COURTS MADE IT UP FOR THE
MAJORITY DECISION.
THE DEFENSE BY JUDGES ROUTE AND
HENDERSON ARE EXCELLENT, I WOULD
COMMEND THOSE TO EVERYONE’S
READING AS THEY ACTUALLY RELY ON
THE LAW.
BUT, YEAH, IT’S QUITE
REMARKABLING.
LOU: SO WHAT HAPPENS NOW?
IT SOUNDS AS THOUGH THE
APPELLATE COURT JUST SAID TO THE
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, YOU KNOW,
IT’S OKAY, WHY DON’T YOU PLAY
PROSECUTOR HERE AND CARRY OUT A
CASE THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TO
SEE WHETHER OR NOT FOR THE FIRST
TIME AS FAR AS WE KNOW THE
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT DOESN’T HAVE
THE RIGHT TO DISMISS A CASE, AND
GENERAL FLYNN HAS, BY THE WAY,
NO CONSTITUTIONAL STANDING OF
ANY KIND AND THE HELL WITH THE
MAN BECAUSE HE JUST SERVED THE
COUNTRY HONORABLY AND WITH GREAT
DISTINCTION AND VALOR.
AND SO JUST TRY TO PERSECUTE HIM
AS LONG AS YOU POSSIBLY CAN,
FOUR YEARS NOW IN THE EFFORT.
>> THAT’S THE ESSENTIAL
DETERMINATION OF THE COURT.
IT’S HARD TO READ IT ANY OTHER
WAY.
IT’S NOTHING SHORT OF APPALLING,
AND THESE ARE IMPORTANT
CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES AT STAKE
HERE NOT JUST FOR MICHAEL FLYNN,
BUT FOR THE COUNTRY AS A WHOLE
AND FOR THE D. OF JUSTICE AND
HOW THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICES
VIS-A-VIS THE FEDERAL COURT.
SO I WOULD NOT SAY THIS IS THE
END OF IT.
I THINK THERE IS GOING TO BE
MORE LITIGATION TO COME,
UNFORTUNATELY, BUT WE’LL KEEP
GOING UNTIL THE COURT GETS IT
RIGHT.
LOU: IS THERE -- BEFORE I ASK
SOME OF THE PROCEDURAL QUESTIONS
HERE, IS THERE ANY REASON WHY WE
SHOULD EXPECT ANYTHING OTHER
THAN EMMET SULLIVAN TO CONTINUE
HIS OUTRAGE AGAINST GENERAL
FLYNN AND PERSISTENTNESS?
>> NO, ABSOLUTELY NOT.
HE’S MADE VERY CLEAR HIS HATRED
OF GENERAL FLYNN, AND HE RELIED
ON A WASHINGTON POST OP-ED BY
THE MAN HE CHOSE TO STEP IN AND
PILE ON AGAINST GENERAL FLYNN IN
THE PROCESS OF MAKING THESE
RULINGS.
AND THE COURT, THE COURT OF
APPEALS JUST RUBBER STAMPS
WHATEVER HE WANTS TO DO.
LOU: IS THERE ANY POINT AT WHICH
THE THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE
UNITED STATES IS SO EMBARRASSED
AND SO IS ASHAMED OF WHAT HAS
BECOME OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY
AND ITS OBVIOUS POLITICAL
CORRUPTION THAT WITHOUT
PROMPTING FROM ANY QUARTER HE
WOULD REACH DOWN TO THE
APPELLATE COURT AND TO THIS
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE AND SAY DO
WHAT IS RIGHT AND END THIS NOW?
>> I WISH HE WOULD, BUT I DON’T
KNOW THAT HE’LL DO THAT WITHOUT
A PETITION FOR WRIT OF
CERTIORARI.
BUT THAT A MAY BE THE DIRECTION
WE HAVE TO GO IN NEXT.
WE’RE CONSIDERING SEVERAL
ALTERNATIVES RIGHT NOW.
FINISH.
LOU: INCLUDING SEEKING AN
EMERGENCY DETERMINATION BY THE
