Ever yelled fire in a theater?
Ever yelled bomb on a plane?
I'm Forrest Maready and this is my incredible
opinion.
Have you ever yelled "fire" in a theater?
Ever yelled "bomb" on a plane?
Don't.
And Don't.
It's stupid and against the law.
And for good reason.
I typically try to stay positive in these
videos, but I want to spend a few minutes
today to let you know about something I'm afraid is going to happen around these parts.
I'm afraid it's beginning to happen already.
If you've followed any of the free speech/hate
speech debate raging across the country these
days, you probably have an opinion about what
people should be allowed AND NOT allowed to
say.
I have an incredible opinion about this issue,
but fortunately for you, I'm going to talk
about something else today.
I'm going to tell you something that is beginning
to happen right now, and if you don't believe
me, then just wait for it.
The snowflake scientists who live in constant
fear of a life without cradle to grave pharmaceutical
intervention are so convinced that vaccines
are necessary to maintain human life on this
planet, they are moving to categorize what
you or I talk about as illegal.
You've probably already seen stories about
certain social networks moving to filter posts
that they, or the politicians they align themselves
with, find offensive or counter to their favored
ideology.
I'm guessing much of what we talk about around
here already falls under the unfavored category,
but I think something much more insidious
is on the horizon.
Look up the 1969 Brandenburg vs. Ohio Supreme
Court case if you want to see some precedent
for what I'm going to talk about.
According to this case, free speech is not
protected by the First Amendment if "the speaker
intends to incite a violation of the law that
is both imminent and likely."
It's known as the imminent lawless action
standard.
And I'm not a legal scholar- I don't know
if you can tell, but I can say those words.
If compulsory vaccination continues to become
reality, its proponents can argue that anything
suggesting vaccines as unnecessary or harmful
would be intending to incite a violation of
the law that is both imminent and likely.
In case what I'm saying isn't clear- I'm suggesting
that not only are social networks likely to
filter or ban discussions about the safety
of vaccinations, I'm also suggesting that
our government could make it illegal to even
talk about- at meetings, through websites,
email, anywhere.
It would be prohibited speech.
You could go to jail just for telling someone
that injecting a newborn with the Hepatitis
B vaccine is the biggest [censored] [censored]
idea on the planet.
This ban on anti-vaccination discussion would
no doubt lend an air of authority to our detractors.
They currently derive much of their ill-gained
confidence from seeing their viewpoints being
espoused on government information sites.
Makes them feel so official and believable.
Having their opposition banned from even mentioning
their concerns will no doubt embolden them
further.
You will be able to spot this coming in response
to increased vaccination resistance.
The believers, who live their waking hours
in panic of disease they've been triply vaccinated
against, may attempt to quash even open, honest
discussion about the side effects of vaccination.
You'll know that we are making real progress
when you start to hear these things happen.
I'm guessing we'll see the perpetually terrified
California Senator Dr. Pan testify in front
of a packed house.
I can hear it now.
It'll happen- I guarantee it.
He'll say something like this "Calling into
question vaccinations, a medical technique
that has been proven safe and effective is
not only counterproductive, it's akin to yelling
fire in a crowded theater."
Mark your calendars folks.
It's June 2016 and I guarantee you we'll hear
someone use that in order to try and shut
down the vaccine conversation.
I realize that this sounds a little koo-koo.
It always does at first, doesn't it?
Then later, once it's happened, it's like
wow, how did we get here?
We're sending Child Protective Services after
mothers who refuse a completely unnecessary
vaccine for their newborns.
I'm not sure when this first started happening,
but I'm sure it sounded crazy coming from
those folks who were warning about it ahead
of time.
It's happening with the climate-change guys.
Whatever your opinion on whether the climate
is changing or not- doesn't really matter.
Just know that state Attorney Generals and
Environmentalists have been working together
to file racketeering lawsuits against "corporations
and other organizations that have knowingly
deceived the American people about the risks
of climate change."
I've read a bunch of conflicting articles
about climate change, and similar to scientists
and the immune system, they think they understand
99% of climate science, but they've really
only scratched the surface.
They can't even explain lightning convincingly.
So whatever you believe, I feel like the science
is not settled.
Certainly not enough to bring some federal
lawsuits against people for questioning something
that the experts don’t really understand.
So it's already happening in some other topics-
it will happen here.
I really don't want to tell you I told you
so on this.
So I'd start making a stand against this medical
tyranny now, while it's easy.
We can speak the truth without fear of jail
time.
For now.
Get on my email list if you haven't already
done it- there's a link at the bottom of the myincredibleopinion.com website.
There are also some fine organizations out
there who will tell you how to get involved,
and I hope you do.
We will need everyone of you.
And that is my incredible opinion.
