although the inception of an ideological
movement is often rooted in altruism
when the adherence of such movements
collectivise and become possessed by the
endgame that their ideology espouses it
is not uncommon for the ideologues to
move from rationality into dogma when
the dog month is delegitimized by facts
paradoxes are not only ignored they are
defended the words gender and sex were
originally synonymous modern gender
theory largely began in 1949 when Simone
de Beauvoir espoused that one does not
have to identify with their birth gender
in the 1990s Judith Butler published
books stating that gender is non-binary
and exists on a spectrum today many on
the far left advocate that both gender
and sex or social constructs therein
lies the paradox of the trans movement
in a perpetual attempt to establish an
infinitely inclusive hierarchy by virtue
of postmodern standards they regress
into infinite exclusivity by D
legitimizing other competing groups it
is intellectually prosaic and ergo
boring to point out when conservatives
have crossed the line however it is
novel to ask the rather unorthodox
question when is the trans movement gone
too far if there is no such thing as
biological male or biological female
how can male privilege exist if men and
women are identical why do they insist
that some men are born with a female
brain and some women are born with a
male brain wouldn't that speak to a
biological difference moreover how can
there be a gender wage gap would does
not also just prove the myth of the
patriarchy how can one be gender fluid
if there are no biological or
psychological differences in the first
place if gender is a social construct
then we are nothing more than products
of our deterministic environment by
blaming men for toxic masculinity
wouldn't these social justice warriors
be blaming the victim we are told not to
blame the victims of rape so why is it
ok to
victims of genetics in fact the gay
movement often insisted that society
should accept them for the way they were
born which I happen to agree with but
shouldn't society also accept white
males for the way they were born and why
is it that stigmas exist against men in
the West for reasons having to do with
toxic masculinity male privilege and
rape culture while political correctness
forbids judging Islam
despite its preservation of an actual
patriarchy in an actual rape culture
there are many that insist gender exists
on a spectrum this stands in stark
contradiction to the letter B for
bisexual in LGBTQ aai P which tells us
that sex is binary if gender is in fact
non-binary then only mentioning lesbians
gays and bisexuals in the acronym is
reductive women are constantly warned
about domestic abuse from evil men who
use their size and strength to dominate
their female partners
however when trans mixed martial artist
Fallon Fox utterly destroyed his female
opponents he was celebrated for
shattering the barrier that has
historically separated the genders and
sports how do these ideologues overlook
these glaring contradictions moreover
how do they explain their own existence
are they not the products of sexual
reproduction between a man and a woman
this maddening conundrum is only
intensified when we take into
consideration transracial ism where
individuals like Rachel Dolezal claim
that race is a social construct that
they identify as a race other than their
birth race are transracial individuals
guilty of cultural appropriation or are
the heroes of the oppressed minority is
race biologically determined or socially
determined if it is indeed a choice we
does not nullify the idea of white
privilege why should institutions have
affirmative action policies if there is
no difference between the ethnicities to
begin with
my four little children will one day
live in a nation where they will not be
judged by the color of their skin but by
the content of their character I have a
dream today
where do we draw the line are we willing
to admit that trans abled individuals
are mentally handicapped like jewel
shooping who intentionally blinded
herself with drain cleaner because she
identified as a blind person what about
the trans species Norwegian woman who
believes she is a cat how about when a
grown man identifies as a child in a
display of trans ageism when 52 year old
Paul Walsh first came out identifying as
a six-year-old girl he was lionized by
the left as a champion of the trans
movement while many conservatives said
this were to open the door to pedophilia
sure enough two years later a 38 year
old pedophile who pled guilty to
molesting three young girls told police
officers that he was a nine year old
trapped in an adult's body we have long
been warned about the risk of sexual
abuse resulting from the power disparity
between a boss and a secretary why is
there not the same concern about a trans
aged adult and a child ideologues do not
have to adhere to consistency because
they do not bother to comply with their
own proposed standard they point the
finger at the right and cry science
denialist while they dismiss the
scientific fact that men and women
evolved to be starkly different
biologically psychologically and
physiologically when James do more
scientifically pointed out how the
differences between the genders result
in traditional gender roles and
different socio-economic outcomes he was
attacked for misogyny this epitomizes
the bear trap of moral relativism you
cannot claim to be a moral relativist
while simultaneously decrying toxic
masculinity the patriarchy and rape
culture it is a self-contradictory
stance to say that someone cannot be
judged while judging others who judge
that person the left has pushed the fat
acceptance movement into the mainstream
for nearly a decade but when Michelle
wolf makes derogatory fat jokes at the
White House Correspondents Dinner
the left is silent political correctness
proponents advocate for sensitivity
towards marginalized groups and yet they
often are the cry bullies that punch
first and blame the victim of course
attempting to reason your way through
this half-baked gobbledygook is an
exercise in futility
it only serves to illustrate how
post-modernism and intersectional dogma
have replaced moral objectivism with
moral subjectivism to society's
detriment what decoys are constructed to
take society's focus away from the
infiltration of America's universities
by Marxists to distract us from the
spread of globalism or to keep us
bickering over trivialities instead of
confronting our common enemies
