Well, I'm not a specialist, you know, of anarchist
thinking but of course I've read a lot of
anarchist literature, you know, from the end
of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th
century.
So, those are kind of big moments, you know,
of anarchism, you know.
And I was struck by the fact that even anarchist
thinkers, you know, shared the same idea of
the traditional political philosophy - meaning,
that society is like an organism, you know,
and so you have to find the right rules; the
right rules, really, corresponding to the
true life, you know, of the organism or, in
this case, the social organism.
So there is always this idea - which belongs
to traditional political philosophy - that
you can really construct the political or
the society, or you know, the communist or
anarchist society as a kind of organism once
you have really found the laws of life, you
know, according to which it should be organized.
And so, this was linked to the scientist context
and what struck me also is that in many respects
anarchist critiques of Marx were most scientist
than Marx himself.
So they always criticize Marx 
from 
the point of 
view 
of true science, true biology, true natural
science, and things like that.
Well, my own 
idea 
was 
that 
there is 
no 
social organism.
There 
is no rule
