
English: 
Previously I spoke in defence of private ownership
on ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’, now I’m
going to speak about why secure private property
rights are important and why communal ownership
proved disastrous. Prior to the first industrial
revolution, there was an extremely high death
rate across the entire world, there were periodical
famines and common malnutrition diseases such
as beriberi, rickets and scurvy. The average
life expectancy of a child was the age of
9 and adult, 40. An English historian by the
name, Edward Gibbon who wrote; ‘The History
of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire’,
later wrote in his own autobiography called
‘Memoirs of My Life and Writings’. In
his autobiography, he mentions that he named
several of his children, Edward, because he
fully expected that most of his children were
going to die and he wanted to keep his fathers
name, Edward, in the family. This gives us

Filipino: 
Dati akong nagsalita sa pagtatanggol ng pribadong pagmamay-ari sa 'Ang Trahedya ng Commons', ngayon ako
pagpunta sa makipag-usap tungkol sa kung bakit secure na mga karapatan sa mga pribadong ari-arian ay mahalaga at kung bakit communal pagmamay-ari
pinatunayan mapaminsala. Bago ang unang pang-industriya rebolusyon, nagkaroon ng isang napakataas na kamatayan
rate sa buong mundo, may mga periodical famines at karaniwang malnutrisyon sakit tulad
tulad ng manas, rakitis at kasumpa-sumpa. Ang average na buhay pag-asa ng isang bata ay ang edad ng
9 at adult, 40. An English mananalaysay sa pamamagitan ng pangalan, Edward Gibbon kung sino ang sumulat; 'Ang kasaysayan
ng Tanggihan at Fall ng Roman Empire ', mamaya wrote sa kanyang sariling autobiography tinatawag
'Memoirs of My Life at Kasulatan'. Sa kanyang autobiography, pagbanggit niya na pinangalanan niya
ang ilan sa kanyang mga anak, Edward, dahil siya ay ganap na inaasahan na ang karamihan sa kanyang mga anak ay
pagpunta sa mamatay at nais niyang panatilihin ang kanyang pangalan ama, Edward, sa pamilya. Ito ay magbibigay sa amin

Polish: 
Wcześniej mówiłem w obronie własności prywatnej sprawie „tragedia wspólnego pastwiska”, teraz jestem
będziemy rozmawiać o tym, dlaczego zabezpieczenia praw własności prywatnej są ważne i dlaczego wspólna własność
okazały się katastrofalne. Przed pierwszym rewolucji przemysłowej, był niezwykle wysoki śmierć
stawka w całym świecie, były okresowe głód i niedożywienie takie wspólne choroby
jak beri-beri, krzywica i szkorbut. Średnia długość życia dziecka był wiek
9 i dorosłych, 40. Angielski historyk o imieniu Edward Gibbon, który napisał; 'Historia
z Zmierzch i upadek Cesarstwa Rzymskiego”, pisał później we własnej autobiografii nazwie
"Wspomnienia z mojego życia i pism. W swojej autobiografii wspomina, że ​​nazwał
kilka jego dzieci, Edwarda, bo oczekiwano w pełni, że większość jego dzieci były
umrze i chce zachować swoje nazwisko ojców Edwarda, w rodzinie. To daje nam

Icelandic: 
Fyrr ég talaði um varnir einkaeign á 'The Tragedy of the Commons ", nú er ég
að fara að tala um af hverju tryggja réttindi einkaeign eru mikilvægt og hvers vegna samfélagsleg eignarhald
reyndist hörmulegur. Áður en fyrsta iðnbyltingunni, það var mjög mikil dauði
hlutfall yfir allan heiminn, það voru reglulegar hungur og algengar vannæring sjúkdóma eins
eins og beriberi, rickets og skyrbjúg. Að meðaltali lífslíkur barns var aldur
9 og fullorðinn, 40. Enska sagnfræðingur að nafni, Edward Gibbon sem skrifaði; 'Sagan
um hnignun og fall Rómaveldis ", skrifaði síðar í eigin ævisögu sinni sem kallast
"Memoirs of My Life og Skrif '. Í sjálfsævisögu sinni, nefnir hann að hann nefndi
nokkrum börnum sínum, Edward, því hann átti alveg eins von að flest börn hans voru
að fara að deyja og hann langaði til að halda feður nafn hans, Edward, í fjölskyldunni. Þetta gefur okkur

iw: 
בעבר דיברתי על הגנת הבעלות הפרטית על הרומאן "הטרגדיה של נחלת הכלל", עכשיו אני
הולך לדבר על למה זכויות קניין פרטי מאובטחות חשובות ומדוע בעלות משותפת
הרת אסון. לפני המהפכה התעשייתית הראשונה, הייתה תמותה גבוהה מאוד
שיעור ברחבי העולם כולו, היו רעבים ומחלות עת תת תזונה נפוצות כגון
כפי ברי-ברי, רככת ו צפדינה. תוחלת החיים הממוצעת של ילד היה בן
9 ו מבוגר, הסטוריון אנגלי 40. לפי השם, אדוארד גיבון שכתב; 'ההיסטוריה
של שקיעתה ונפילתה של האימפריה הרומית", כתב מאוחר יותר באוטוביוגרפיה שלו שנקרא
"זכרונותיה של חייו וכתביו שלי". באוטוביוגרפיה שלו, הוא מזכיר כי הוא בשם
כמה מילדיו, אדוארד, משום שהוא צפוי לחלוטין שרוב ילדיו היו
הולך למות והוא רצה לשמור שם אבותיו, אדוארד, במשפחה. זה נותן לנו

Italian: 
In precedenza ho parlato in difesa della proprietà privata su 'La tragedia dei beni comuni', ora sono
andando a parlare perché i diritti di proprietà privata sicuri sono importanti e perché proprietà comune
rivelata disastrosa. Prima della prima rivoluzione industriale, c'era una morte estremamente elevato
tasso di tutto il mondo, ci sono stati carestie periodiche e le malattie più comuni come ad malnutrizione
come beriberi, rachitismo e lo scorbuto. L'aspettativa media di vita di un bambino era l'età della
9 e adulti, 40. Un inglese di nome storico, Edward Gibbon che ha scritto; 'La storia
della decadenza e caduta dell'impero romano', in seguito scrisse nella sua autobiografia chiamato
'Memorie della Mia Vita e Scritti'. Nella sua autobiografia, egli cita che ha chiamato
molti dei suoi figli, Edward, perché si aspettava che la maggior parte dei suoi figli erano
andando a morire e voleva mantenere il suo nome padri, Edward, nella famiglia. Questo ci dà

Spanish: 
Anteriormente hablé en defensa de la propiedad privada sobre 'La tragedia de los comunes', ahora estoy
va a hablar acerca de por qué los derechos de propiedad privada seguras son importantes y por qué la propiedad comunal
demostrado desastroso. Antes de la primera revolución industrial, se produjo una muerte extremadamente alta
tasa a través de todo el mundo, hubo hambrunas periódicas y enfermedades comunes tales desnutrición
como el beriberi, el raquitismo y el escorbuto. La esperanza media de vida de un niño era la edad de
9 y adultos, 40. Un historiador Inglés por el nombre, Edward Gibbon que escribió; 'La historia
de la decadencia y caída del Imperio Romano', más tarde escribió en su autobiografía titulada
'Memorias de mi vida y los escritos'. En su autobiografía, él menciona que él nombró
varios de sus hijos, Edward, porque él plenamente espera que la mayoría de sus hijos eran
va a morir y que quería mantener su nombre padres, Edward, en la familia. Esto nos da

Dutch: 
Eerder sprak ik in de verdediging van prive-eigendom op 'The Tragedy of the Commons', nu ben ik
gaat over de reden waarom beveiligde private eigendom zijn van belang om te spreken en waarom gemeenschappelijke eigendom
bleek desastreus. Voorafgaand aan de eerste industriële revolutie, was er een extreem hoog dood
snelheid over de hele wereld, waren er momenten waarop er hongersnoden en gemeenschappelijke ondervoeding ziekten
als beriberi, rachitis en scheurbuik. De gemiddelde levensverwachting van een kind de leeftijd van
9 en volwassen, 40. Een Engels historicus door de naam, Edward Gibbon die schreef; 'De geschiedenis
van de Daling en de Val van het Romeinse Rijk', schreef later in zijn eigen autobiografie genaamd
'Memoirs of My Life en geschriften'. In zijn autobiografie, vermeldt hij dat hij de naam
een aantal van zijn kinderen, Edward, omdat hij verwachtte dat de meeste van zijn kinderen
ga sterven en hij wilde zijn vaders naam, Edward houden, in de familie. Dit geeft ons

Turkish: 
Daha önce ben şimdi ben, 'Avam Tragedy' üzerinde özel mülkiyet savunan konuşmalar
Güvenli özel mülkiyet hakları neden önemli olduğunu anlatacak ve neden ortak mülkiyet
feci kanıtladı. İlk sanayi devrimi öncesinde, son derece yüksek ölüm yoktu
oran tüm dünyada, periyodik kıtlıklar ve ortak yetersiz beslenme hastalıkları böyle vardı
Beriberi'ye raşitizm ve iskorbütten olarak. Bir çocuğun ortalama yaşam süresi çağıydı
9 ve yetişkin, yazdığı ismi Edward Gibbon tarafından 40. Bir İngiliz tarihçi; 'Tarih
Roma İmparatorluğu'nun' Reddet ve Fall, daha sonra kendi otobiyografisinde denilen yazdı
'My Yaşam ve Yazıları Anıları'. Otobiyografisinde olarak, kendisinin adını bahseder
Onun çocukları, Edward, birkaç hiçbir zaman tamamen çocukların çoğunda olduğu tahmin çünkü
ölecek ve o ailede, babasının adını, Edward tutmak istedi. Bu, bize

Vietnamese: 
Trước đây tôi đã nói chuyện để bảo vệ sở hữu tư nhân về 'Bi kịch của Commons', bây giờ tôi
sẽ nói về lý do tại sao quyền sở hữu tư nhân an toàn rất quan trọng và tại sao sở hữu xã
tỏ ra thảm họa. Trước khi tiến hành cuộc cách mạng công nghiệp đầu tiên, đã có một cái chết rất cao
Tỷ lệ trên toàn bộ thế giới, đã có nạn đói kỳ và các bệnh suy dinh dưỡng chung như vậy
như beriberi, còi xương và bệnh còi. Tuổi thọ trung bình của một đứa trẻ là tuổi
9 và trưởng thành, 40. nhà sử học Một tiếng Anh bằng tên, Edward Gibbon người đã viết; 'Lịch sử
của Từ chối và sụp đổ của đế chế La Mã, sau này đã viết trong cuốn tự truyện của mình được gọi là
'Memoirs of Life và Writings của tôi'. Trong cuốn tự truyện của mình, ông nói rằng ông đặt tên
một vài người con của ông, Edward, bởi vì ông dự kiến ​​đầy đủ rằng hầu hết các con của ông là
sẽ chết và ông muốn giữ tên cha mình, Edward, trong gia đình. Điều này cho phép chúng tôi

Croatian: 
Ranije sam govorio u obranu privatnog vlasništva na „tragediju Commons”, sada sam
će govoriti o tome zašto sigurne prava privatnog vlasništva su važne i zašto komunalno vlasništvo
pokazalo katastrofalne. Prije prve industrijske revolucije, bilo je izuzetno visok smrt
Stopa diljem cijelog svijeta, bilo je povremenih gladi i zajedničke loša ishrana bolesti kao
kao Beriberi, rahitisa i skorbuta. Prosječna očekivana životna dob djeteta bilo doba
9 i odrasle, 40. engleski povjesničar po imenu, Edward Gibbon koji je napisao; 'Povijest
od pada i pada Rimskog Carstva”, kasnije napisao u svojoj autobiografiji pod nazivom
'Sjećanja na moj život i spisi. U svojoj autobiografiji, on spominje da je on imenovan
nekoliko njegovih djece, Edward, jer je očekivao da je većina njegove djece bile
umrijeti i želio je da njegovi oci ime, Edward, u obitelji. To nam daje

Chinese: 
以前我在私有製辯護談到了“公地悲劇”，現在我
要談論為什麼安全的私有財產權是重要的，為什麼公共所有權
證明是災難性的。在此之前的第一次工業革命，有一個非常高的死亡
率在整個世界上，有週期性的飢荒和營養不良的常見疾病，
腳氣病，佝僂病和壞血病。一個孩子的平均壽命年齡
9和成人，40的英國歷史學家的名字，愛德華·吉本是誰寫的; “歷史
羅馬帝國的衰亡，後來在自己的自傳中寫道叫
“我的生活與寫作回憶錄”。在他的自傳中，他提到，他命名
幾個他的孩子，愛德華，因為他完全可以預料，他的大部分孩子都是
要死了，他想保住自己的父親的名字，愛德華，在家庭中。這給了我們

Malay (macrolanguage): 
Sebelum ini saya bercakap dalam mempertahankan pemilikan swasta mengenai 'Tragedi Commons', sekarang saya
akan bercakap tentang mengapa hak harta persendirian dengan selamat adalah penting dan mengapa pemilikan komunal
membuktikan bencana. Sebelum revolusi perindustrian pertama, terdapat kematian yang sangat tinggi
Kadar di seluruh dunia, terdapat kebuluran berkala dan penyakit kekurangan zat makanan biasa seperti
sebagai beriberi, penyakit riket dan skurvi. Jangka hayat purata seorang kanak-kanak adalah zaman
9 dan dewasa, 40. An English sejarah dengan nama, Edward Gibbon yang menulis; 'Sejarah
daripada Tolak dan Kejatuhan Empayar Roman ', kemudian menulis dalam autobiografinya sendiri dipanggil
'Memoirs of Life dan Tulisan saya'. Dalam autobiografinya, dia menyebut bahawa dia bernama
beberapa anak-anaknya, Edward, kerana dia dijangka sepenuhnya bahawa kebanyakan anak-anaknya
akan mati dan dia mahu menjaga nama nenek moyangnya, Edward, dalam keluarga. Ini memberikan kita

Latin: 
Ante dixi, in ius propriimi in defensione, et Tragoedia plebis, iam non sum
quod ius proprietatis de certa referre ad quid communione rerum
id locorum fuisse. Prior ad primam odio, maxime princeps est ad mortem
certe per orbem erant fames periodicum deminutae morbis communia
ut beriberi, digeruntur scabie quoque et rickets. In mediocris vitae expectationem est puer aetate
Et adulta IX, 40. Anglis rerum nomine, Edward Gibbon, qui scripsit; 'De historia
Ne declines ad Fall et Romanorum Imperii ', postea scripsisse dicitur in vita sua
'Liber de Vita Et Scriptis mea. In vita sua, ostendit quod nominatur
plures filii Edwardi propter spem plerique liberorum
iret mori voluit, ut suo et patres nomen tuum, Edward, in familia. Haec nobis

Modern Greek (1453-): 
Προηγουμένως μίλησα για την υπεράσπιση της ατομικής ιδιοκτησίας με θέμα «Η Τραγωδία των Κοινών», τώρα είμαι
θα μιλήσει σχετικά με το γιατί η εξασφάλιση των δικαιωμάτων ιδιωτικής ιδιοκτησίας είναι σημαντικό και γιατί κοινοκτημοσύνη
αποδείχθηκε καταστροφική. Πριν από την πρώτη βιομηχανική επανάσταση, υπήρξε μια εξαιρετικά υψηλή θάνατο
ρυθμό σε ολόκληρο τον κόσμο, υπήρχαν περιοδικές πείνα και κοινές ασθένειες του υποσιτισμού, όπως
όπως μπέρι-μπέρι, ραχίτιδα και σκορβούτο. Ο μέσος όρος ζωής ενός παιδιού ήταν η εποχή της
9 και ενηλίκων, 40. Ένας Άγγλος ιστορικός από το όνομα, Έντουαρντ Γκίμπον ο οποίος έγραψε? 'Η ιστορία
του Παρακμή και Πτώση της Ρωμαϊκής Αυτοκρατορίας», έγραψε αργότερα στο δικό αυτοβιογραφία του που ονομάζεται
«Απομνημονεύματα της ζωής και γραπτά μου». Στην αυτοβιογραφία του, ο ίδιος αναφέρει πως το όνομα
αρκετά από τα παιδιά του, Έντουαρντ, γιατί απόλυτα αναμενόμενο ότι τα περισσότερα από τα παιδιά του ήταν
πρόκειται να πεθάνει και ο ίδιος ήθελε να κρατήσει τους πατέρες το όνομά του, Έντουαρντ, στην οικογένεια. Αυτό μας δίνει

Chinese: 
以前我在私有制辩护谈到了“公地悲剧”，现在我
要谈论为什么安全的私有财产权是重要的，为什么公共所有权
证明是灾难性的。在此之前的第一次工业革命，有一个非常高的死亡
率在整个世界上，有周期性的饥荒和营养不良的常见疾病，
脚气病，佝偻病和坏血病。一个孩子的平均寿命年龄
9和成人，40的英国历史学家的名字，爱德华·吉本是谁写的; “历史
罗马帝国的衰亡，后来在自己的自传中写道叫
“我的生活与写作回忆录”。在他的自传中，他提到，他命名
几个他的孩子，爱德华，因为他完全可以预料，他的大部分孩子都是
要死了，他想保住自己的父亲的名字，爱德华，在家庭中。这给了我们

Panjabi: 
ਪਿਹਲ ਮੈਨੂੰ 'ਤੇ' ਕਾਮਨਜ਼ ਦੀ ਤ੍ਰਾਸਦੀ ਦਾ 'ਨਿੱਜੀ ਮਾਲਕੀ ਦੇ ਪੱਖ ਵਿਚ ਗੱਲ ਕੀਤੀ ਸੀ, ਹੁਣ ਮੈਨੂੰ ਰਿਹਾ
ਇਸੇ ਬਾਰੇ ਸੁਰੱਖਿਅਤ ਨਿੱਜੀ ਜਾਇਦਾਦ ਦੇ ਹੱਕ ਮਹੱਤਵਪੂਰਨ ਹਨ ਗੱਲ ਕਰਨ ਲਈ ਜਾ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ਇਸੇ ਫਿਰਕੂ ਮਾਲਕੀ
ਤਬਾਹਕੁਨ ਸਾਬਤ ਹੋਇਆ. ਪਹਿਲੀ ਪੁਰਾਣੇ ਸਨਅਤੀ ਇਨਕਲਾਬ ਕਰਨ, ਇੱਕ ਬਹੁਤ ਹੀ ਉੱਚ ਮੌਤ ਸੀ
ਦੀ ਦਰ ਸਾਰਾ ਸੰਸਾਰ ਭਰ ਵਿੱਚ, periodical ਕਾਲ ਅਤੇ ਆਮ ਕੁਪੋਸ਼ਣ ਰੋਗ ਅਜਿਹੇ ਵੀ ਸਨ
ਬੇਰੀਬੇਰੀ, rickets ਅਤੇ scurvy ਦੇ ਤੌਰ ਤੇ. ਇੱਕ ਬੱਚੇ ਦੀ ਔਸਤ ਜ਼ਿੰਦਗੀ ਦੀ ਸੰਭਾਵਨਾ ਦੀ ਉਮਰ ਦਾ ਸੀ
9 ਅਤੇ ਬਾਲਗ, 40. ਨਾਮ, ਐਡਵਰਡ Gibbon ਜਿਸ ਨੇ ਲਿਖਿਆ ਕੇ ਇਕ ਅੰਗਰੇਜ਼ੀ ਇਤਿਹਾਸਕਾਰ; 'ਇਤਿਹਾਸ
ਅਸਵੀਕਾਰ ਅਤੇ ਰੋਮੀ ਸਾਮਰਾਜ ਦੇ ਪਤਨ ਦੇ, ਬਾਅਦ ਵਿਚ ਉਸ ਦੇ ਆਪਣੇ ਹੀ ਆਤਮਕਥਾ ਵਿਚ ਲਿਖਿਆ ਕਹਿੰਦੇ
'ਮੇਰਾ ਜੀਵਨ ਅਤੇ ਪੋਥੀ ਦੇ ਆਪਣੀਆ. ਆਪਣੀ ਆਤਮਕਥਾ ਵਿੱਚ, ਉਸ ਨੇ ਜ਼ਿਕਰ ਕੀਤਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਉਸ ਨੇ ਨਾਮ
ਉਸ ਦੇ ਬੱਚੇ, ਐਡਵਰਡ ਦੇ ਕਈ ਉਹ ਪੂਰੀ ਉਮੀਦ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਉਸ ਦੇ ਬੱਚੇ ਦੀ ਸਭ ਸਨ
ਮਰਨ ਲਈ ਜਾ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ਉਸ ਨੇ, ਉਸ ਦੇ ਪਿਉ ਦਾ ਨਾਮ, ਐਡਵਰਡ ਰੱਖਣ ਲਈ ਪਰਿਵਾਰ ਵਿਚ ਚਾਹੁੰਦਾ ਸੀ. ਇਹ ਸਾਨੂੰ ਦਿੰਦਾ ਹੈ

German: 
Zuvor sprach ich bei der Verteidigung des Privateigentums über ‚Die Tragik der Allmende‘, jetzt bin ich
gehen sprechen darüber, warum eine sichere private Eigentumsrechte sind wichtig und warum Gemeineigentum
erwies sich als verhängnisvoll. Vor der ersten industriellen Revolution gab es einen extrem hohen Tod
Rate auf der ganzen Welt gab es periodische Hungersnot und üblich, solche Unterernährung Krankheiten
wie Beriberi, Rachitis und Skorbut. Die durchschnittliche Lebenserwartung eines Kindes war das Zeitalter der
9 und Erwachsenen, 40. Ein englischer Historiker mit Namen, Edward Gibbon, der schrieb; 'Die Geschichte
der Verfall und Untergang des Römischen Reiches‘, schrieb später in seiner eigenen Biographie genannt
'Memoirs of My Life and Writings'. In seiner Autobiographie erwähnt er, dass er benannt
mehrere seiner Kinder, Edward, weil er voll zu erwarten, dass die meisten seiner Kinder waren
sterben würde und er wollte, dass seine Väter Namen behalten, Edward, in der Familie. Dies gibt uns

Norwegian: 
Tidligere har jeg snakket i forsvaret av privat eierskap på 'The Tragedy of Commons', nå er jeg
kommer til å snakke om hvorfor sikre privat eiendomsrett er viktig og hvorfor felles eierskap
viste seg katastrofale. Før den første industrielle revolusjonen var det en ekstremt høy død
hastighet over hele verden, var det periodiske hungersnød og vanlige underernæring sykdommer slike
som beriberi, rakitt og skjørbuk. Den gjennomsnittlige levealder for et barn var i en alder av
9 og voksen, 40. En engelsk historiker ved navn Edward Gibbon som skrev; 'Historien
av nedgangen og fallet av det romerske imperiet', senere skrev i sin egen selvbiografi kalt
'Memoirs of My Life og Writings'. I sin selvbiografi, nevner han at han heter
flere av hans barn, Edward, fordi han regnet med at de fleste av hans barn var
kommer til å dø, og han ønsket å holde hans fedre navn, Edward, i familien. Dette gir oss

French: 
Auparavant, je parlais dans la défense de la propriété privée sur « La tragédie des communes », maintenant je suis
va parler des raisons pour lesquelles les droits de propriété privée sécurisée sont importantes et pourquoi la propriété communale
révélée désastreuse. Avant la première révolution industrielle, il y avait une mort extrêmement élevée
taux à travers le monde entier, il y avait des famines périodiques et les maladies de malnutrition communes telles
comme le béribéri, le rachitisme et le scorbut. L'espérance de vie moyenne d'un enfant était l'âge de
9 et adultes, 40. Un historien anglais du nom, Edward Gibbon qui a écrit; 'L'histoire
du déclin et la chute de l'Empire romain », écrit plus tard dans sa propre autobiographie appelé
Mémoires de ma vie et les écrits ». Dans son autobiographie, il mentionne qu'il a nommé
plusieurs de ses enfants, Edward, parce qu'il s'attendait que la plupart de ses enfants étaient
va mourir et il voulait garder son nom de pères, Edward, dans la famille. Cela nous donne

Serbian: 
Раније сам говорио у одбрану приватног власништва на "трагедију Цоммонс ', сада сам
ће говорити о томе зашто су сигурне права приватне имовине важно и зашто комунално власништво
показало катастрофалним. Пре прве индустријске револуције, било је изузетно висока смрт
Стопа широм целог света, било је повремених глади и заједничке неадекватне исхране болести такви
ас Берибери, рахитиса и скорбут. Просечни животни век детета је било доба
9 и одрасле, 40. Енглески историчар по имену, Едвард Гиббон ​​који је написао; 'Историја
од Одбијање и пад Римског царства ", касније написао у својој аутобиографији под називом
"Мемоирс оф Ми Лифе анд Вритингс '. У својој аутобиографији, помиње да је именовао
неколико његових деце, Едвард, јер је потпуно очекивано да је већина његових деце били
ће умрети и желео је да задржи своје име очеви, Едвард, у породици. То нам даје

Danish: 
Tidligere talte jeg i forsvar for den private ejendomsret på 'The Tragedy of the Commons', nu er jeg
kommer til at tale om, hvorfor sikker privat ejendomsret er vigtige, og hvorfor fælles ejerskab
vist sig katastrofal. Forud for den første industrielle revolution, der var en ekstremt høj død
sats over hele verden, der var periodiske hungersnød og fælles fejlernæring sygdomme sådanne
som beriberi, rakitis og skørbug. Den gennemsnitlige levealder for et barn var en alder af
9 og voksen, 40. En engelsk historiker ved navn, Edward Gibbon, der skrev; 'Historien
af forfald og undergang Romerriget', skrev senere i sin egen selvbiografi kaldet
'Memoirs of My Life og skrifter'. I sin selvbiografi, nævner han, at han navngivet
flere af hans børn, Edward, fordi han fuldt forventet, at de fleste af hans børn var
kommer til at dø, og han ønskede at beholde sin fars navn, Edward, i familien. Det giver os

Swedish: 
Tidigare talade jag till försvar för privat ägande om 'tragedin i Commons', nu är jag
kommer att tala om varför säkra privata äganderätten är viktiga och varför gemensamt ägande
visade sig vara katastrofalt. Före den första industriella revolutionen, det var en extremt hög död
hastighet över hela världen, det var periodiska hungersnöd och gemensamma undernäring sjukdomar sådana
som beriberi, rakitis och skörbjugg. Den genomsnittliga livslängden för ett barn var en ålder av
9 och vuxen, 40. En engelsk historiker vid namn Edward Gibbon som skrev; 'Historien
av nedgången och nedgången av det romerska riket', skrev senare i sin egen självbiografi heter
'Memoirs of My Life och skrifter'. I sin självbiografi, nämner han att han namngav
flera av hans barn, Edward, eftersom han helt väntat att de flesta av hans barn var
kommer att dö och han ville behålla sin fars namn, Edward, i familjen. Detta ger oss

Hungarian: 
Korábban beszéltem védelmében magántulajdon, „Az emberek tragédiája”, most én vagyok
fog beszélni, hogy miért biztonságos magántulajdon jogok fontosak, és miért kommunális tulajdonban
katasztrofálisnak bizonyult. Mielőtt az első ipari forradalom, volt egy nagyon rossz halálozási
ráta az egész világban voltak, időszakos éhínség és az alultápláltság gyakori betegségek, mint
például beriberi, angolkór és a skorbut. Az átlagos várható élettartam egy gyermek kora volt
9 és felnőtt, 40. Az angol történész neve, Edward Gibbon, aki írta; 'A történelem
A hanyatlása és bukása A Római Birodalom”, írta később saját életrajzában úgynevezett
'Memoirs of My Life and Writings'. Önéletrajzában említi, hogy ő megnevezett
több a gyerek, Edward, mert várta, hogy a legtöbb a gyerekek
meg fog halni, és azt akarta, hogy az ő atyáival neve, Edward, a családban. Ez ad nekünk

Russian: 
Ранее я говорил в защиту частной собственности на «Трагедии Коммонс», теперь я
буду говорить о том, почему безопасные права частной собственности являются важными и почему коммунальная собственность
оказалось губительным. До первой промышленной революции, была чрезвычайно высокая смертность
Скорость по всему миру, были периодический голод и общие заболевания недоедания таких
а авитаминоз, рахит и цингу. Средняя продолжительность жизни ребенка был возраст
9 и взрослых, 40. Английский историк по имени Эдвард Гиббон, который написал; 'История
упадка и разрушения Римской империи», позднее писал в своей автобиографии под названием
«Воспоминания о моей жизни и Писаниях». В своей автобиографии он упоминает, что он назвал
некоторые из его детей, Эдварда, потому что он ожидал, что большинство его детей
собираюсь умереть, и он хотел, чтобы его имя отцов, Эдвард, в семье. Это дает нам

Korean: 
이전에 지금 난, '하원의 비극'에 대한 사적 소유의 방어 이야기
안전한 개인 재산권이 중요한 이유에 대해 말하는 것 왜 공동 소유
비참한 입증했다. 최초의 산업 혁명 이전에, 매우 높은 죽음이 있었다
속도로 전 세계에 걸쳐, 정기 기근 및 일반 영양 실조 질환 등이 있었다
각기병, 구루병과 괴혈병 등. 아이의 평균 기대 수명의 나이
9 성인, 쓴 이름, 에드워드 긴팔 원숭이로 (40) 영어의 역사; '역사
로마 제국 '의 쇠퇴와 타락, 나중에 자신의 자서전에서 호출 썼다
'내 삶과 글의 회고록'. 그의 자서전에서 그는이라는 것을 언급
그의 아이들, 에드워드, 여러 그는 완전히 자신의 아이들의 대부분이 있다고 기대하기 때문에
죽을 그는 가족에, 그의 아버지의 이름, 에드워드을 유지하고 싶었다. 이것은 우리를 제공합니다

Arabic: 
سابقا تحدثت في الدفاع عن الملكية الخاصة على 'مأساة العموم، والآن أنا
الذهاب إلى الحديث عن لماذا حقوق الملكية الخاصة آمنة هامة ولماذا الملكية الجماعية
ثبت كارثية. قبل الثورة الصناعية الأولى، كان هناك موت مرتفعة للغاية
معدل عبر العالم كله، كانت هناك المجاعات الدورية وأمراض سوء التغذية شيوعا مثل هذه
كما البري بري والكساح والإسقربوط. وكان متوسط ​​العمر المتوقع للطفل في سن
9 والكبار، 40. مؤرخ إنجليزية من قبل الاسم، إدوارد جيبون الذي كتب. 'التاريخ
من انحدار وسقوط الإمبراطورية الرومانية "، كتب لاحقا في سيرته الذاتية الخاصة تسمى
"مذكرات من حياتي وكتابات. في سيرته الذاتية، يذكر أن سماها
العديد من أبنائه، إدوارد، لأنه من المتوقع تماما أن معظم أولاده كانوا
لن يموت وانه يريد ان يبقي له اسم والده، إدوارد، في الأسرة. وهذا يعطينا

Ukrainian: 
Раніше я говорив на захист приватної власності на «Трагедії Коммонс», тепер я
буду говорити про те, чому безпечні права приватної власності є важливими і чому комунальна власність
виявилося згубним. До першої промислової революції, була надзвичайно висока смертність
Швидкість по всьому світу, були періодичний голод і загальні захворювання недоїдання таких
а авітаміноз, рахіт і цингу. Середня тривалість життя дитини був вік
9 і дорослих, 40. Англійський історик на ім'я Едвард Гіббон, який написав; 'Історія
занепаду і руйнування Римської імперії », пізніше писав у своїй автобіографії під назвою
«Спогади про моє життя і Писанні». У своїй автобіографії він згадує, що він назвав
деякі з його дітей, Едварда, тому що він очікував, що більшість його дітей
збираюся померти, і він хотів, щоб його ім'я батьків, Едвард, в сім'ї. Це дає нам

Portuguese: 
Anteriormente falei em defesa da propriedade privada sobre 'A Tragédia dos Comuns', agora eu sou
vai falar sobre por que os direitos de propriedade privada seguras são importantes e por propriedade comunal
provou desastrosa. Antes da primeira revolução industrial, houve uma morte extremamente elevado
taxa em todo o mundo, havia fome periódicas e doenças de desnutrição comuns tais
como beribéri, raquitismo e escorbuto. A esperança média de vida de uma criança era a idade de
9 e adulto, 40. Uma Inglês historiador pelo nome, Edward Gibbon que escreveu; 'A história
do Declínio e Queda do Império Romano', escreveu mais tarde em sua própria autobiografia chamada
'Memórias da Minha Vida Escritos'. Em sua autobiografia, ele menciona que ele nomeou
vários de seus filhos, Edward, porque ele totalmente esperado que a maioria de seus filhos eram
vai morrer e ele queria manter seu nome pais, Edward, na família. Isso nos dá

Slovak: 
Predtým som hovoril na obranu osobnom vlastníctve o, tragédii Commons ', teraz som
bude hovoriť o tom, prečo zabezpečené práva súkromného vlastníctva, sú dôležité a prečo komunálne vlastníctva
ukázal sa katastrofálne. Pred prvou priemyselnej revolúcie došlo k mimoriadne vysokým smrť
Sadzba v rámci celého sveta, tam boli periodické hladomory a časté ochorenie podvýživa takejto
ako beri-beri, krivica a skorbut. Priemerná dĺžka života dieťaťa bol vek
9 a dospelých, 40. anglický historik menom, Edward Gibbon, ktorý napísal; 'História
poklesu a pádu rímskej ríše ', neskôr napísal vo svojom vlastnom životopise nazvaný
'Memoirs of My Life a spisy'. V jeho autobiografii, on sa zmieni, že on menoval
niekoľko jeho detí, Edward, pretože očakával, že väčšina z jeho detí boli
zomrie a on chcel, aby jeho otca meno Edwarda, v rodine. To nám dáva

Lithuanian: 
Anksčiau aš kalbėjau ginti privačią nuosavybę nuo "The Commons tragedija", dabar aš
ketina kalbėti apie tai, kodėl saugoma privačios nuosavybės teisės yra svarbios ir kodėl bendruomenės nuosavybė
pasirodė pražūtingas. Prieš pirmą pramoninės revoliucijos, ten buvo labai didelis mirtis
rodiklis visoje pasaulyje, ten buvo periodiniai badmečių ir bendros prastos mitybos ligų, tokių
kaip Avitaminozė, rachitas ir niekingas. Vidutinė gyvenimo trukmė vaiko buvo Amžius
9 ir suaugusiųjų, 40. Anglų istorikas pagal pavadinimą, Edward Gibbon rašęs; 'Istorija
iš nuosmukio ir kritimo Romos imperijos ", vėliau rašė savo autobiografijoje vadinamas
"Atsiminimai mano gyvenimo ir raštų". Savo autobiografijoje jis pamini, kad jis pavadino
keletas jo vaikams, Edward, nes jis visiškai tikimasi, kad dauguma jo vaikai buvo
mirs, ir jis norėjo išlaikyti savo tėvų vardą, Edward, šeimoje. Tai suteikia mums

Finnish: 
Aikaisemmin puhuin puolustukseen yksityisomistuksen aiheesta 'yhteismaan ongelma', nyt olen
aio puhua miksi turvallinen yksityinen tekijänoikeudet ovat tärkeitä ja miksi yhteisöllinen omistajuus
osoittautui katastrofaalinen. Ennen ensimmäistä teollinen vallankumous oli erittäin korkea kuolleisuus
korko koko maailmassa oli säännöllinen nälänhädät ja yhteisiä aliravitsemus kaltaisten tautien
kuten beriberi, riisitautia ja keripukki. Keskimääräinen elinikä lapsen oli vuotiaana
9 ja aikuinen, 40. Englanti historioitsija nimen, Edward Gibbon joka kirjoitti; 'The History
ja rappeutuminen Rooman valtakunnan', kirjoitti myöhemmin omassa omaelämäkerran nimeltään
'Memoirs of My Life ja kirjoitukset'. Omaelämäkerran, hän mainitsee, että hän nimesi
useat hänen lapset, Edward, koska hän täysin odotettua, että suurin osa hänen lapsensa olivat
kuolee ja hän halusi pitää isänsä nimen, Edward, perheessä. Tämä antaa meille

Indonesian: 
Sebelumnya saya berbicara dalam membela kepemilikan pribadi atas 'Tragedi Commons', sekarang aku
akan berbicara tentang mengapa hak milik pribadi yang aman adalah penting dan mengapa kepemilikan komunal
terbukti bencana. Sebelum revolusi industri pertama, ada kematian yang sangat tinggi
tingkat di seluruh dunia, ada kelaparan berkala dan penyakit kekurangan gizi umum seperti
sebagai beri-beri, rakhitis dan penyakit kudis. Harapan hidup rata-rata seorang anak usia
9 dan dewasa, 40. Sebuah Sejarawan Inggris dengan nama, Edward Gibbon yang menulis; 'Sejarah
dari Penurunan dan Kejatuhan Kekaisaran Romawi', kemudian menulis dalam otobiografinya sendiri disebut
'Memoirs of My Life dan Tulisan-tulisan'. Dalam otobiografinya, ia menyebutkan bahwa ia bernama
beberapa dari anak-anaknya, Edward, karena ia diharapkan sepenuhnya bahwa sebagian besar anak-anaknya
akan mati dan ia ingin menjaga nama ayahnya, Edward, dalam keluarga. Ini memberi kita

Japanese: 
以前私は今、私は、「コモンズの悲劇」に私有の防衛に話しました
安全な私有財産権が重要である理由について話すために行くとなぜ共同所有権
悲惨な証明しました。最初の産業革命以前には、非常に高い死亡がありました
全世界にわたる率、定期的な飢饉と、このような一般的な栄養不良の疾患がありました
脚気、くる病や壊血病など。子供の平均寿命はの年齢でした
9と書いた大人、名前で40英語の歴史家、エドワード・ギボン。'歴史
ローマ帝国の衰退と秋」は、後で呼ばれる彼自身の自伝に書きました
「私の人生と著作の回顧録」。彼の自伝では、彼は名前のことに言及します
彼は完全に彼の子供たちのほとんどがあったことが予想されるので、エドワード、彼の子供のいくつかの
死ぬと、彼は家族の中で、彼の父親の名前、エドワードを維持したいです。これは、私たちを与えます

Macedonian: 
Јас претходно зборуваше во одбрана на приватна сопственост на "Трагедијата на Долниот дом", сега сум
се случува да се зборува за тоа зошто безбедна права на приватна сопственост се важни и зошто заедничка сопственост
се покажа како катастрофална. Пред првата индустриска револуција, имаше исклучително високо смрт
стапка за целиот свет, имаше периодични глад и неисхранетост заеднички болести,
како бери-бери, рахитис и скорбут. Просечниот животен век на детето беше на возраст од
9 и возрасни, 40. Еден англискиот историчар по име, Едвард Гибон кој ја напишал; 'Историјата
на падот и падот на Римската Империја, подоцна напишал во својата автобиографија наречена
"Мемоарите на мојот живот и дела". Во својата автобиографија, тој споменува дека тој по име
неколку од неговите деца, Едвард, бидејќи тој целосно се очекува дека повеќето од неговите деца беа
ќе умре и дека сака да го задржи името на неговиот татко, Едвард, во семејството. Ова ни дава

Malay (macrolanguage): 
petunjuk jelas bahawa hidup sebelum revolusi perindustrian pertama, adalah cukup dahsyat
untuk rakyat biasa dan kanak-kanak berbanding dengan kanak-kanak zaman Victoria, ibu-ibu dan bapa-bapa
kemudian ke dalam pertengahan abad kesembilan belas. Dalam buku Thomas J. Dilorenzo ini 'Bagaimana Kapitalisme
Amerika tersimpan ', dia menyebut mengenai tempoh yang dikenali sebagai "masa kelaparan", beliau menulis:
"Peneroka Amerika yang pertama tiba di Jamestown pada bulan Mei 1607. Di sana, di Virginia
rantau Tidewater, mereka mendapati tanah sangat subur dan banyaknya makanan laut, permainan liar
seperti rusa dan ayam belanda, dan buah-buahan dari semua jenis. Walau bagaimanapun, dalam tempoh enam bulan, semua
tetapi 38 yang asal 104 peneroka Jamestown telah mati, sebahagian besar telah meninggal dunia akibat kebuluran. "
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Icelandic: 
skýr vísbending um að lífið áður en fyrsta iðnbyltingunni, voru nokkuð hræðilegt
fyrir venjulegt fólk og börn í samanburði við victorian börn, mæður og feður
síðar í miðjan nítjándu öld. Í bókinni Thomas J. Dilorenzo er 'Hvernig Kapítalismi
Vistað America ', nefnir hann um tíma þekktur sem "sveltandi tíma", skrifar hann:
"Fyrstu American landnámsmenn komu í Jamestown í maí 1607. Þar í Virginíu
Tidewater svæðinu, fannst þeir ótrúlega frjóan jarðveg og Nægtahorn sjávarfangi, villibráð
svo sem dádýr og Tyrklandi, og ávexti af öllu tagi. Engu að síður, innan sex mánaða, allt
en 38 af upprunalegu 104 Jamestown landnema voru dauðir, flestir hafa bíða lægri hlut til hungrinu. "
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Slovak: 
jasným dôkazom, že život pred prvou priemyselnej revolúcie, boli dosť hrozné
Pre obyčajných ľudí a deti v porovnaní s viktoriánskej deti, matky a otca
neskôr do polovice devätnásteho storočia. V Thomas J. DiLorenzo knihe, Ako kapitalizmus
Uložené America ', on sa zmieni o obdobie známeho jako,hladovějící času', píše:
"Prvý americkí osadníci prišli do Jamestown v máji 1607. Tam, vo Virgínii
Tidewater región našli neuveriteľne úrodnú pôdu a hojnosť morských živočíchov, voľne žijúcej zveri
ako sú jelene a Turecka a ovocie všetkého druhu. Avšak, v lehote šiestich mesiacov, všetko
ale 38 z pôvodných 104 Jamestown osadníkov bola mŕtva, väčšina že podľahol hladu. "
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Dutch: 
een duidelijke indicatie dat het leven voorafgaand aan de eerste industriële revolutie, waren behoorlijk verschrikkelijk
voor de gewone mensen en kinderen in vergelijking met de Victoriaanse kinderen, moeders en vaders
later in het midden van de negentiende eeuw. In het boek van Thomas J. Dilorenzo's 'Hoe Kapitalisme
Opgeslagen America', noemt hij over een periode die bekend staat als de ‘honger tijd’, schrijft hij:
“De eerste Amerikaanse kolonisten arriveerden in Jamestown in mei 1607. Daar, in de Virginia
Tidewater regio, vonden ze ongelooflijk vruchtbare grond en een overvloed aan vis, wild
zoals herten en kalkoen, en de vruchten van alle soorten. Niettemin, binnen zes maanden, alle
maar 38 van de oorspronkelijke 104 Jamestown kolonisten dood waren, de meeste hebben bezweken aan honger.”
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Polish: 
wyraźne wskazanie, że życie przed pierwszym rewolucji przemysłowej były dość straszne
dla zwykłych ludzi i dzieci w porównaniu do wiktoriańskiej dzieci, matek i ojców
później w połowie XIX wieku. W książce Thomas J. DiLorenzo za „Jak kapitalizm
Zapisane Ameryka”, wspomina o okres znany jako«czas głoduje», pisze:
„Pierwsi amerykańscy osadnicy przybyli do Jamestown w maju 1607 roku tam, w Wirginii
Region Tidewater, okazało się niezwykle podatny grunt i feerię owoce morza, dziczyzna
takie jak jelenie i Turcji, a także wszelkiego rodzaju owoców. Niemniej jednak, w ciągu sześciu miesięcy, wszystkie
ale 38 z pierwotnych 104 Jamestown osadników były martwe, najbardziej po ulegli głodu.”
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years
later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and
within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why
the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Finnish: 
osoittaa selvästi, että elämä ennen ensimmäistä teollinen vallankumous, olivat melko kamala
tavallisille ihmisille ja lapsille verrattuna Victorian lapset, äidit ja isät
Myöhemmin osaksi puolivälissä yhdeksästoista luvulla. Thomas J. Dilorenzo kirjan 'Kuinka Kapitalismi
Tallennetut America', hän mainitsee sen ajanjakson kutsutaan ’nälkää aika’, hän kirjoittaa:
”Ensimmäinen amerikkalainen ihmisiä saapui Jamestown toukokuussa 1607. Siellä Virginia
Tidewater alueella, he löysivät uskomattoman hedelmällinen maaperä ja runsaudensarvi äyriäiset, luonnonvaraisen riistan
kuten peuroja ja kalkkuna, ja hedelmiä kaikenlaista. Kuitenkin kuuden kuukauden kuluessa, kaikki
mutta 38 alkuperäisestä 104 Jamestown asukkaat olivat kuolleet, useimmat joilla sortunut nälänhätää.”
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years
later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and
within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why
the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

German: 
ein klarer Hinweis darauf, dass das Leben vor der ersten industriellen Revolution, ziemlich schrecklich waren
für die gewöhnlichen Menschen und Kinder im Vergleich zu den viktorianischen Kinder, Mütter und Väter
später in die Mitte des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts. In Thomas J. Dilorenzo Buch ‚Wie Kapitalismus
Gespeichert America‘, er über einen Zeitraum erwähnt als‚Verhungern Zeit‘bekannt ist, schreibt er:
„Die ersten amerikanischen Siedler kamen in Jamestown im Mai 1607. Dort, in der Virginia
Tidewater Region, fanden sie unglaublich fruchtbaren Boden und ein Füllhorn an Meeresfrüchten, Wild
wie Hirsche und Truthahn und Früchte aller Art. Dennoch innerhalb von sechs Monaten, die alle
aber 38 der ursprünglichen 104 Jamestown Siedler waren tot, die meisten an Hunger erlegen zu haben.“
Fortsetzung, Tom Dilorenzo sagt: „Zwei Jahre später schickte der Virginia Company 500 mehr
„Rekruten“ in Virginia zu begleichen, und innerhalb von sechs Monaten eine Staffelung 440 Tote durch
Hunger und Krankheit.“Der Grund, warum die Pilger Siedler verhungert waren

Russian: 
четкое указание, что жизнь до первой промышленной революции, было довольно ужасно
для обычных людей и детей по сравнению с Викторианской детей, матерей и отцов
затем в середине девятнадцатого века. В книге Томаса Дж ДиЛоренцо в «Как Капитализм
Сохраненный Америки, он упоминает о периоде, известном как „голодное время“, он пишет:
«Первые американские поселенцы прибыли в Джеймстаун в мае 1607. Там, в Вирджинии
Тайдуотер область, они обнаружили невероятно плодородную почву и изобилие морепродуктов, дичи
такие как олени и индейка, и фрукты всех видов. Тем не менее, в течение шести месяцев, все
но 38 из первоначальных 104 Джеймстауна поселенцев были мертвы, большинство поддавшись голод «.
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Indonesian: 
indikasi yang jelas bahwa kehidupan sebelum revolusi industri pertama, yang cukup mengerikan
untuk orang-orang biasa dan anak-anak dibandingkan dengan anak-anak Victoria, ibu dan ayah
kemudian ke pertengahan abad kesembilan belas. Dalam buku Thomas J. DiLorenzo ini 'Bagaimana Kapitalisme
Disimpan America', ia menyebutkan tentang periode yang dikenal sebagai ‘waktu kelaparan’, ia menulis:
“Para pemukim Amerika pertama tiba di Jamestown pada bulan Mei 1607. Di sana, di Virginia
wilayah Tidewater, mereka menemukan tanah sangat subur dan tumpah ruah dari seafood, permainan liar
seperti rusa dan kalkun, dan buah-buahan dari semua jenis. Namun demikian, dalam waktu enam bulan, semua
tapi 38 yang asli 104 pemukim Jamestown sudah mati, yang paling harus menyerah kelaparan.”
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years
later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and
within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why
the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Lithuanian: 
aiškiai rodo, kad gyvenimas iki pirmojo pramoninės revoliucijos, buvo gana siaubinga
už paprastų žmonių ir vaikų, palyginti su Viktorijos vaikams, motinoms ir tėvams
vėliau į vidurio XIX amžiuje. Be Thomas J. Dilorenzo knygos "Kaip kapitalizmas
Išsaugoti Amerika ", jis mini apie laikotarpį, žinomas kaip" badaujantis laiką ", jis rašo:
"Pirmieji Amerikos gyventojai atvyko į Jamestown gegužę 1607. Ten, Virginia
Tidewater regionas, jie rado neįtikėtinai dirvą ir jūros gėrybių ragas, laukinių medžiojamų
pavyzdžiui, elnių ir Turkija, vaisių visų tipų. Nepaisant to, per šešis mėnesius, visi
bet 38 originalių 104 Jamestown gyventojai buvo miręs, dauguma to, pasidavė bado ".
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

French: 
une indication claire que la vie avant la première révolution industrielle, était assez horrible
pour les gens ordinaires et les enfants par rapport aux enfants victoriens, les mères et les pères
plus tard dans le milieu du XIXe siècle. Dans le livre de Thomas J. Dilorenzo « Comment le capitalisme
Enregistré en Amérique », il mentionne sur une période connue sous le nom « temps faim », il écrit:
« Les premiers colons américains sont arrivés à Jamestown en mai 1607. Là-bas, dans la Virginie
région Tidewater, ils ont trouvé un sol incroyablement fertile et une corne d'abondance de fruits de mer, gibier sauvage
comme le cerf et la Turquie, et les fruits de toutes sortes. Néanmoins, dans les six mois, tous les
mais 38 des 104 colons de Jamestown originaux étaient morts, la plupart ayant succombé à la famine « .
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years
later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and
within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why
the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Vietnamese: 
một dấu hiệu rõ ràng rằng cuộc sống trước khi cuộc cách mạng công nghiệp đầu tiên, khá khủng khiếp
cho những người bình thường và trẻ em so với những đứa trẻ Victoria, mẹ và cha
sau đó vào giữa thế kỷ XIX. Trong cuốn sách của Thomas J. Dilorenzo của 'Làm thế nào chủ nghĩa tư bản
Saved Mỹ', ông đề cập về một giai đoạn được gọi là ‘thời gian chết đói’, ông viết:
“Những người định cư Mỹ đầu tiên đến Jamestown vào tháng 1607. Ở đó, trong Virginia
khu vực Tidewater, họ thấy đất vô cùng màu mỡ và dồi dào hải sản, trò chơi hoang dã
như nai và gà tây, và thành quả của tất cả các loại. Tuy nhiên, trong vòng sáu tháng, tất cả
nhưng 38 của bản gốc 104 cư Jamestown đã chết, hầu hết đã qua đời vì nạn đói.”
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Italian: 
una chiara indicazione che la vita prima della prima rivoluzione industriale, erano piuttosto orribile
per la gente comune e dei bambini rispetto ai bambini vittoriano, madri e padri
più tardi la metà del XIX secolo. Nel libro di Thomas J. Dilorenzo 'Come capitalismo
Saved America', accenna di un periodo noto come il ‘tempo di fame’, egli scrive:
“I primi coloni americani arrivarono a Jamestown nel maggio del 1607. Lì, in Virginia
regione Tidewater, hanno trovato terreno incredibilmente fertile e una cornucopia di frutti di mare, selvaggina
come cervi e tacchino, e frutta di ogni genere. Tuttavia, entro sei mesi, tutti i
ma 38 delle originali 104 coloni Jamestown erano morti, la maggior parte aver ceduto alla fame.”
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years
later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and
within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why
the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Latin: 
odio vitae ante primum indicium esset pulchellus terribilis
ad vulgi morem et ad filios comparari Victoriani liberos, matres et patres
deinde in medium saeculum undevicensimum. J. apud Thomam Dilorenzo librum, quomodo Capitalismus
Servo Americae, etc., ostendit tempus circiter quae ad "tempus fame pereo", cum scribit:
"Primum in May 1607. Est American habitatores venit in Iacobopolis in Virginia
Tidewater regione se incredibili inventus est et cornu copiae, ut firmaret radicem super seafood, de venationibus illius
cervos uti Graecia et cunctarum frugum. Sed infra sex menses omni
XXXVIII sed ad originale CIV Iacobopolis mortui essent, maxime cessere fame intereant. "
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Danish: 
en klar indikation af, at livet forud for den første industrielle revolution, var temmelig forfærdeligt
for almindelige mennesker og børn i forhold til den victorianske børn, mødre og fædre
senere i midten af ​​det nittende århundrede. I Thomas J. Dilorenzo bog 'How Kapitalisme
Gemte Amerika', han nævner om en periode kendt som ’sulter tid’, skriver han:
”De første amerikanske nybyggere ankom i Jamestown i maj 1607. Der, i Virginia
Tidewater regionen, fandt de utroligt frugtbar jord og et overflødighedshorn af fisk og skaldyr, vildt
såsom hjorte og kalkun, og frugter af alle slags. Ikke desto mindre, inden for seks måneder, alt
men 38 af de oprindelige 104 Jamestown bosættere var døde, de fleste efter at have bukket under for hungersnød.”
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years
later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and
within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why
the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Korean: 
인생은 최초의 산업 혁명 이전에, 꽤 무서운라고 분명히 표시
빅토리아 어린이, 어머니와 아버지에 비해 보통 사람들과 어린이를위한
이후 19 세기 중반에. 토마스 J. Dilorenzo의 책에서 '어떻게 자본주의
저장 미국이 ', 그는 "굶주리는 시간"으로 알려진 기간에 대해 언급, 그는 글을 참고하세요 :
"미국 최초의 정착민들은 버지니아에서,이 1607 월에 제임스 타운에 도착
조수 지역, 그들은 믿을 수 없을 정도로 비옥 한 토양과 해산물의 풍요의 뿔, 야생 게임 발견
사슴과 칠면조, 모든 종류의 과일로. 그럼에도 불구하고, 6 개월 이내에 모든
그러나 원래의 104 제임스 타운 정착의 (38)는 죽은 대부분의 기근에 굴복 한. "
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years
later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and
within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why
the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Chinese: 
清楚地表明，生活之前，第一次工业革命，是相当可怕
为老百姓和孩子相比，维多利亚的孩子，母亲和父亲
后来进了十九世纪中叶。在托马斯J.迪洛伦佐的书“如何资本主义
保存的美国”，他提到了关于被称为‘饥饿时间’期间，他写道：
“第一个美国移民来到詹姆斯敦在1607年有可能，在弗吉尼亚州
潮水区域，他们觉得非常肥沃的土壤和海鲜的聚宝盆，野味
such as deer and turkey, and fruits of all
kind. Nevertheless, within six months, all
but 38 of the original 104 Jamestown settlers
were dead, most having succumbed to famine.”
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years
later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and
within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why
the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Japanese: 
最初の産業革命前の生活は、かなり恐ろしいだったことを明らかに示し
ビクトリア朝の子供、母親と父親に比べて一般の人々や子供のための
後から19世紀半ばに。トーマスJ. Dilorenzoの著書には「どのように資本主義
保存されたアメリカが」、彼は 『飢え時間』として知られている期間について言及し、彼は書いています：
「最初のアメリカ人入植者はバージニア州で、そこ1607の月にジェームズタウンに到着しました
タイドウォーターの領域は、彼らは非常に肥沃な土壌と魚介類の宝庫、野生のゲームを見つけました
このよう鹿や七面鳥、およびすべての種類の果物など。それにもかかわらず、6ヶ月以内に、すべての
しかし、元の104人のジェームズタウン入植者の38は最も飢饉に屈した、死んでいました。」
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years
later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and
within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why
the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

English: 
a clear indication that life prior to the
first industrial revolution, were pretty horrible
for the ordinary people and children compared
to the victorian children, mothers and fathers
later into the mid-nineteenth century. In
Thomas J. Dilorenzo’s book ‘How Capitalism
Saved America’, he mentions about a period
known as the “starving time”, he writes:
“The first American settlers arrived in
Jamestown in May of 1607. There, in the Virginia
Tidewater region, they found incredibly fertile
soil and a cornucopia of seafood, wild game
such as deer and turkey, and fruits of all
kind. Nevertheless, within six months, all
but 38 of the original 104 Jamestown settlers
were dead, most having succumbed to famine.”
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years
later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and
within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why
the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Chinese: 
清楚地表明，生活之前，第一次工業革命，是相當可怕
為老百姓和孩子相比，維多利亞的孩子，母親和父親
後來進了十九世紀中葉。在托馬斯J.迪洛倫佐的書“如何資本主義
保存的美國“，他提到了關於被稱為”飢餓時間“期間，他寫道：
“第一個美國移民來到詹姆斯敦在1607年有可能，在弗吉尼亞州
潮水區域，他們覺得非常肥沃的土壤和海鮮的聚寶盆，野味
如鹿和火雞，及各種水果。然而，半年之內，所有的
但原來的104詹姆斯敦定居者38死亡，大多數是死於飢荒“。
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years
later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and
within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why
the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Turkish: 
Hayat birinci sanayi devrimi öncesinde oldukça korkunç olduğunu açık bir göstergesidir
Victoria çocukları, anne ve babaları ile karşılaştırıldığında sıradan insanlar ve çocuklar için
Daha sonra On dokuzuncu yüzyılın ortalarından içine. Thomas J. DiLorenzo en kitabında 'Nasıl Kapitalizm
Kayıtlı Amerika'nın, o ‘açlıktan zaman’ olarak bilinen bir süre bahseder, şöyle yazar:
“İlk Amerikan yerleşimciler Virginia Orada 1607'de Mayıs ayında Jamestown geldi
Tidewater bölgesi, onlar inanılmaz bereketli toprak ve deniz ürünleri bir bereket, yaban oyun bulundu
Böyle geyik ve hindi ve her türlü meyve olarak. Yine de, altı ay içinde, bütün
ancak orijinal 104 Jamestown yerleşimciler 38 ölmüştü, en kıtlık succumbed.”
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Ukrainian: 
чітку вказівку, що життя до першої промислової революції, було досить жахливо
для звичайних людей і дітей в порівнянні з Вікторіанської дітей, матерів та батьків
потім в середині дев'ятнадцятого століття. У книзі Томаса Дж ДіЛоренцо в «Як Капіталізм
Збережено Америки, він згадує про період, відомому як "голодний час", він пише:
«Перші американські поселенці прибули в Джеймстаун в травні 1607. Там, у Вірджинії
Тайдуотер область, вони виявили неймовірно родючий грунт і достаток морепродуктів, дичини
такі як олені і індичка, і фрукти всіх видів. Проте, протягом шести місяців, все
але 38 з початкових 104 Джеймстауну поселенців були мертві, більшість піддавшись голод «.
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Filipino: 
isang malinaw na indikasyon na buhay bago ang unang pang-industriya rebolusyon, ay pretty kakila-kilabot
para sa mga ordinaryong tao at bata kumpara sa Victorian bata, mga ina at ama
mamaya sa kalagitnaan ng ikalabinsiyam na siglo. Sa Thomas J. Dilorenzo libro 'Paano Kapitalismo
Nai-save Amerika ', pagbanggit niya tungkol sa isang panahon na kilala bilang ang "gutom time", magsusulat siya:
"Ang unang Amerikanong settlers dumating sa Jamestown sa Mayo ng 1607. Doon, sa Virginia
Tidewater rehiyon, nakita nila hindi kapani-paniwalang matabang lupa at isang kornukopya ng mga pagkaing-dagat, wild laro
tulad ng usa at turkey, at prutas ng lahat ng uri. Gayunpaman, sa loob ng anim na buwan, ang lahat ng
ngunit 38 ng orihinal na 104 Jamestown settlers ay patay, karamihan sa pagkakaroon ng succumbed sa taggutom. "
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Panjabi: 
ਇੱਕ ਸਾਫ ਸੰਕੇਤ ਹੈ, ਜੋ ਕਿ ਜੀਵਨ ਨੂੰ ਪਹਿਲੀ ਪੁਰਾਣੇ ਸਨਅਤੀ ਇਨਕਲਾਬ ਕਰਨ, ਪਰੈਟੀ ਭਿਆਨਕ ਸਨ
ਆਮ ਲੋਕ ਅਤੇ ਵਿਕਟੋਰੀਆ ਦੇ ਬੱਚੇ, ਮਾਤਾ-ਪਿਤਾ ਦੇ ਮੁਕਾਬਲੇ ਬੱਚੇ ਲਈ
ਬਾਅਦ ਵਿਚ ਅੱਧ-ਉਨ ਵੀ ਸਦੀ ਵਿੱਚ. ਥਾਮਸ ਜੇ Dilorenzo ਦੀ ਕਿਤਾਬ ਵਿਚ 'ਕਰਨਾ ਸਰਮਾਏਦਾਰੀ
ਸੰਭਾਲੀ ਅਮਰੀਕਾ ', ਉਸ ਨੇ ਇੱਕ ਮਿਆਦ' ਭੁੱਖੇ ਵਾਰ "ਦੇ ਤੌਰ ਤੇ ਜਾਣਿਆ ਬਾਰੇ ਜ਼ਿਕਰ ਕੀਤਾ ਹੈ, ਉਹ ਲਿਖਦਾ ਹੈ:
"ਪਹਿਲੇ ਅਮਰੀਕੀ ਵੱਸਣ 1607. ਉੱਥੇ ਦੇ ਮਈ ਵਿਚ ਜਮੇਸਤੋਵਨ ਵਿੱਚ ਪਹੁੰਚੇ, ਵਰਜੀਨੀਆ ਵਿਚ
Tidewater ਖੇਤਰ ', ਉਹ ਬਹੁਤ ਹੀ ਉਪਜਾਊ ਮਿੱਟੀ ਅਤੇ ਸਮੁੰਦਰੀ ਭੋਜਨ ਦੀ ਇੱਕ cornucopia, ਜੰਗਲੀ ਖੇਡ ਨੂੰ ਪਾਇਆ
ਅਜਿਹੇ ਹਿਰਨ ਅਤੇ ਟਰਕੀ, ਅਤੇ ਸਾਰੇ ਕਿਸਮ ਦੇ ਫਲ ਦੇ ਤੌਰ ਤੇ. ਫਿਰ ਵੀ, ਛੇ ਮਹੀਨੇ ਦੇ ਅੰਦਰ-ਅੰਦਰ, ਸਾਰੇ
ਪਰ ਅਸਲੀ 104 ਜਮੇਸਤੋਵਨ ਵੱਸਣ ਦੇ 38 ਮਰੇ ਸਨ, ਸਭ ਕਾਲ ਨੂੰ ਤੋੜ ਦਿੱਤਾ. "
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Croatian: 
jasan pokazatelj da je život prije prve industrijske revolucije, bili su prilično strašno
za obične ljude i djecu u odnosu na Victorian djece, majki i očeva
kasnije u sredinom devetnaestog stoljeća. U Thomas J. Dilorenzo knjige „Kako Kapitalizam
Spremljeno Amerika”, spominje oko razdoblja poznatog kao‘natašte vremena’, piše:
„Prvi američki doseljenici stigli u Jamestown u svibnju 1607. Tamo, u Virginiji
Tidewater regija, našli su nevjerojatno plodno tlo i rog izobilja plodova mora, divljač
kao što su jeleni i Turska, a plodovi svih vrsta. Ipak, u roku od šest mjeseci, sve
ali 38 originalnih 104 Jamestown doseljenici bili su mrtvi, većina nakon što je podlegao gladi.”
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

iw: 
אינדיקציה ברורה שהחיים שלפני המהפכה התעשייתית הראשונה, היו די נורא
עבור אנשים וילדים רגילים, לעומת הילדים, האמהות והאבות ויקטוריאני
מאוחר יותר לתוך אמצע המאה התשע עשרה. בשנת תומס ג 'ספרו של Dilorenzo "איך הקפיטליזם
שמורים אמריקה", הוא מזכיר לגבי תקופה המכונה 'זמן מת מרעב', הוא כותב:
"המתנחלים האמריקאי הראשון הגיע ג'יימסטאון במאי 1607. שם, וירג'יניה
באזור טיידווטר, הם מצאו קרקע פורייה להפליא שפע של פירות ים, ציד
כגון צבאים טורקיה, ופירות מכל סוג. עם זאת, בתוך שישה חודשים, כל
אבל 38 של המתיישבים הראשונים 104 ג'יימסטאון היו מתים, רוב לאחר נכנע רעב."
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Spanish: 
una clara indicación de que la vida antes de la primera revolución industrial, eran bastante horrible
para la gente común y los niños en comparación con los niños del victorian, madres y padres
más tarde en la segunda mitad del siglo XIX. En el libro de Thomas J. Dilorenzo 'Cómo el capitalismo
Guardado de Estados Unidos, menciona acerca de un período conocido como el ‘tiempo muerto de hambre’, escribe:
“Los primeros colonos americanos llegaron a Jamestown en mayo del 1607. Allí, en la Virginia
región de la marea, se encontró un terreno muy fértil y una gran abundancia de mariscos, caza silvestre
como el ciervo y el pavo, y las frutas de todo tipo. Sin embargo, dentro de los seis meses, todos
pero 38 de los 104 colonos de Jamestown estaban muertos, la mayor parte de haber sucumbido a la hambruna “.
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years
later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and
within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why
the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Hungarian: 
egyértelműen jelzi, hogy az élet előtt az első ipari forradalom volt elég szörnyű
a hétköznapi emberek és a gyermekek, mint a viktoriánus gyermekek, anyák és apák
később a tizenkilencedik század közepén. Thomas J. DiLorenzo könyve „Hogyan Capitalism
Mentett America”, megemlíti egy időszak az úgynevezett»éhező idő«, azt írja:
„Az első amerikai telepesek érkeztek Jamestown májusában 1607. Ott, a Virginia
Tidewater régióban, úgy találták, hihetetlenül termékeny talaj és töméntelen tenger gyümölcsei, vadak
mint a szarvas és a pulyka, és a gyümölcsök minden fajtája. Mindazonáltal hat hónapon belül minden
de 38 az eredeti 104 Jamestown telepesek halott, legtöbbjük belehalt éhínség.”
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Arabic: 
دلالة واضحة على الحياة قبل الثورة الصناعية الأولى، كان فظيع جدا
للشعب والأطفال العاديين مقارنة مع الأطفال فيكتوريا والأمهات والآباء
في وقت لاحق إلى منتصف القرن التاسع عشر. في كتاب توماس J. Dilorenzo في "كيف الرأسمالية
محفوظ أمريكا "، وهو يذكر عن الفترة المعروفة باسم" الوقت يتضورون جوعا "، وقال انه كتب ما يلي:
"وصل المستوطنون الأمريكي الأول في جيمس تاون في مايو 1607. وهناك، في ولاية فرجينيا
منطقة مياه المد، وجدوا تربة خصبة للغاية وفرة من المأكولات البحرية، لعبة البرية
مثل الغزلان وتركيا، والفواكه من كل نوع. ومع ذلك، في غضون ستة أشهر، كل
ولكن كانت 38 من الأصلي 104 مستوطن جيمس تاون الميت، أكثر بعد أن استسلمت للمجاعة ".
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Serbian: 
јасан показатељ да је живот пре прве индустријске револуције, били су прилично страшно
за обичне људе и деце у односу на Вицториан деце, мајки и очева
касније у средином КСИКС века. У Тхомас Ј. Дилорензо књиге "Како капитализам
Сачувани Америка ", помиње о периоду који је познат као" време гладује ", пише:
"Први амерички досељеници стигли у Џејмстаун у мају 1607. дошли, у Вирџинији
Тидеватер регија, нашли су невероватно плодно тло и изобиље плодова мора, дивљач
као сто су јелени и Турској, а плодова свих врста. Ипак, у року од шест месеци, сви
али 38 од првобитних 104 ЈАМЕСТОВН досељеника били мртви, највише што подлегли глади. "
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Norwegian: 
en klar indikasjon på at livet før den første industrielle revolusjonen, var ganske forferdelig
for vanlige folk og barn i forhold til den viktorianske barn, mødre og fedre
senere i midten av forrige århundre. I Thomas J. Dilorenzo bok 'Hvordan Kapitalismen
Lagrede America', nevner han om en periode kjent som ‘sulter tid’, skriver han:
“De første amerikanske nybyggere ankom i Jamestown i mai 1607. Der, i Virginia
Tidewater region, fant de utrolig fruktbar jord og et overflødighetshorn av sjømat, vilt
som hjort og kalkun, og fruktene av alle slag. Likevel, innen seks måneder, alt
men 38 av de opprinnelige 104 Jamestown lere var døde, mest å ha falt til sult “.
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Modern Greek (1453-): 
μια σαφής ένδειξη ότι η ζωή πριν από την πρώτη βιομηχανική επανάσταση, ήταν αρκετά φρικτό
για τους απλούς ανθρώπους και τα παιδιά σε σύγκριση με τα βικτοριανή παιδιά, οι μητέρες και οι πατέρες
αργότερα μέσα στο μέσα του δέκατου ένατου αιώνα. Στο βιβλίο του Thomas J. Dilorenzo τίτλο «Πώς καπιταλισμός
Αποθηκευμένες Αμερική», αναφέρει για μια περίοδο γνωστή ως η“ώρα λιμοκτονούν”, γράφει:
«Οι πρώτοι άποικοι της Αμερικής έφτασε στο Τζέιμσταουν Μάιο του 1607. Εκεί, στη Βιρτζίνια
περιοχή Tidewater, βρήκαν εξαιρετικά εύφορο έδαφος και μια αφθονία των θαλασσινών, τα άγρια ​​θηράματα
όπως τα ελάφια και γαλοπούλα, και φρούτα όλων των ειδών. Παρ 'όλα αυτά, μέσα σε έξι μήνες, όλα τα
αλλά 38 από τους αρχικούς 104 Τζέιμσταουν αποίκων ήταν νεκροί, οι περισσότεροι αφού υπέκυψαν στην πείνα.»
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years
later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and
within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why
the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Macedonian: 
јасен показател дека животот пред првата индустриска револуција, се прилично страшни
за обичните луѓе и деца во однос на Викторија деца, мајки и татковци
подоцна во средината на деветнаесеттиот век. Во книгата на Томас Џ Dilorenzo е "Како Капитализмот
Зачувани Америка ", тој ги спомнува за периодот познат како" гладни време ", тој пишува:
"Првиот американски доселеници пристигнаа во Jamestown во мај 1607. Таму, во Вирџинија
регионот Tidewater, тие откриле неверојатно плодна почва и Рог на изобилство на морска храна, дивеч
како срната и Турција, и плодови од секаков вид. Сепак, во рок од шест месеци, сите
но 38 од оригиналниот 104 Џејмстаун доселеници биле мртви, од кои повеќето ја подлегнаа на глад ".
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Portuguese: 
uma clara indicação de que a vida antes da primeira revolução industrial, foram muito horrível
para as pessoas comuns e crianças em comparação com as crianças do Victorian, mães e pais
mais tarde em meados do século XIX. No livro de Thomas J. Dilorenzo 'Como o capitalismo
América Saved', ele menciona sobre um período conhecido como o ‘tempo de fome’, ele escreve:
“Os primeiros colonos americanos chegaram a Jamestown, em Maio de 1607. Há, na Virginia
região Tidewater, eles encontraram solo extremamente fértil e uma cornucópia de frutos do mar, caça selvagem
como veados e de peru e frutas de todos os tipos. No entanto, dentro de seis meses, todos
mas 38 dos 104 colonos originais Jamestown estavam mortos, a maioria tendo sucumbido à fome.”
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Swedish: 
en tydlig indikation på att livet före den första industriella revolutionen, var ganska hemskt
för vanliga människor och barn jämfört med de viktorianska barn, mödrar och fäder
senare i mitten av artonhundratalet. I Thomas J. Dilorenzo bok 'hur kapitalismen
Sparade America', nämner han om en period som kallas ’svälter tid’, skriver han:
”Den första amerikanska bosättarna anlände i Jamestown i maj 1607. Där i Virginia
Tidewater region, fann de oerhört bördig jord och ett överflöd av fisk och skaldjur, vilt
såsom rådjur och kalkon, och frukter av alla slag. Ändå inom sex månader, alla
men 38 av de ursprungliga 104 Jamestown nybyggarna var döda, de flesta efter att ha fallit för svält.”
Continued, Tom Dilorenzo says: “Two years
later, the Virginia Company sent 500 more
“recruits” to settle in Virginia, and
within six months a staggering 440 dead by
starvation and disease.” The reason why
the pilgrim settlers were starving to death

Vietnamese: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world, these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor, so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested. Reality proves that you work harder when you

Lithuanian: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world, these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor, so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested. Reality proves that you work harder when you

Italian: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding
them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial
gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into
servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced
was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits
for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they
responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world,
these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor,
so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private
property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit
you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested.
Reality proves that you work harder when you

Dutch: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world, these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor, so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested. Reality proves that you work harder when you

Swedish: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding
them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial
gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into
servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced
was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits
for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they
responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world,
these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor,
so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private
property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit
you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested.
Reality proves that you work harder when you

Portuguese: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world, these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor, so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested. Reality proves that you work harder when you

Filipino: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world, these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor, so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested. Reality proves that you work harder when you

Spanish: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding
them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial
gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into
servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced
was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits
for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they
responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world,
these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor,
so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private
property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit
you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested.
Reality proves that you work harder when you

Serbian: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world, these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor, so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested. Reality proves that you work harder when you

Russian: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world, these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor, so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested. Reality proves that you work harder when you

Japanese: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding
them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial
gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into
servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced
was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits
for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they
responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world,
these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor,
so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private
property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit
you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested.
Reality proves that you work harder when you

Hungarian: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world, these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor, so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested. Reality proves that you work harder when you

Finnish: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding
them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial
gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into
servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced
was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits
for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they
responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world,
these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor,
so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private
property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit
you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested.
Reality proves that you work harder when you

Indonesian: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding
them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial
gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into
servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced
was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits
for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they
responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world,
these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor,
so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private
property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit
you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested.
Reality proves that you work harder when you

Korean: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding
them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial
gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into
servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced
was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits
for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they
responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world,
these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor,
so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private
property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit
you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested.
Reality proves that you work harder when you

French: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding
them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial
gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into
servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced
was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits
for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they
responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world,
these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor,
so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private
property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit
you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested.
Reality proves that you work harder when you

Macedonian: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world, these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor, so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested. Reality proves that you work harder when you

English: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding
them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial
gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into
servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced
was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits
for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they
responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world,
these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor,
so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private
property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit
you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested.
Reality proves that you work harder when you

Modern Greek (1453-): 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding
them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial
gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into
servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced
was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits
for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they
responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world,
these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor,
so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private
property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit
you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested.
Reality proves that you work harder when you

Slovak: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world, these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor, so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested. Reality proves that you work harder when you

Danish: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding
them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial
gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into
servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced
was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits
for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they
responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world,
these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor,
so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private
property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit
you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested.
Reality proves that you work harder when you

Turkish: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world, these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor, so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested. Reality proves that you work harder when you

Latin: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world, these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor, so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested. Reality proves that you work harder when you

German: 
trotz einer großen Menge des Lebensmittels um sie herum war nicht, weil sie faul waren, weil
die Leute konnten nicht für ihren eigenen finanziellen Gewinn arbeiten, sie nicht für die Früchte arbeiten konnten
ihrer eigenen Arbeit, wurden sie in die Sklaverei gezwungen. Tom Dilorenzo weiter auf mit den Worten:
„Seit sieben Jahren alles, was sie produziert wurde in einen gemeinsamen Pool zu gehen, verwendet werden soll, angeblich,
die Kolonie und erzeugen Gewinne für die Virginia Company zu unterstützen. Härter arbeiten, oder
mehr war nicht von Vorteil für sie, und sie antwortete, wie jemand würde von Drückebergerei. Mit
freien Durchgang in die neue Welt gegeben worden, diese Siedler sollten kompensieren
die Virginia Company durch ihre Arbeit, so waren sie reneging effektiv auf ihre
Verträge.“In Ermangelung einer sicheren privaten Eigentumsrechte, ohne für die zu arbeiten
Früchte der eigenen Arbeit, es Ihnen persönlich nicht profitieren, härter zu arbeiten, es ist menschlich
Natur, die wir natürlich eigennützig sind. Realität beweist, dass Sie härter arbeiten, wenn Sie

Icelandic: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world, these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor, so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested. Reality proves that you work harder when you

iw: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world, these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor, so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested. Reality proves that you work harder when you

Norwegian: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world, these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor, so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested. Reality proves that you work harder when you

Chinese: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding
them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial
gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into
servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced
was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits
for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they
responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world,
these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor,
so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private
property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit
you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested.
Reality proves that you work harder when you

Malay (macrolanguage): 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world, these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor, so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested. Reality proves that you work harder when you

Croatian: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world, these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor, so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested. Reality proves that you work harder when you

Arabic: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world, these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor, so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested. Reality proves that you work harder when you

Ukrainian: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world, these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor, so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested. Reality proves that you work harder when you

Panjabi: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world, these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor, so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested. Reality proves that you work harder when you

Chinese: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding
them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial
gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into
servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced
was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits
for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they
responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world,
these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor,
so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private
property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit
you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested.
Reality proves that you work harder when you

Polish: 
despite a large quantity of the food surrounding
them wasn’t because they were lazy, because
the people could not work for their own financial
gain, they couldn’t work for the fruits
of their own labour, they were forced into
servitude. Tom Dilorenzo continues on by saying:
“For seven years, all that they produced
was to go into a common pool to be used, supposedly,
to support the colony and to generate profits
for the Virginia Company. Working harder or
longer was of no benefit to them, and they
responded as anyone would, by shirking. Having
been given free passage to the new world,
these settlers were supposed to compensate
the Virginia Company through their labor,
so they were effectively reneging on their
contracts.” In the absence of secure private
property rights, absence to working for the
fruits of your own labour, it does not benefit
you personally to work harder, it is human
nature that we are naturally self-interested.
Reality proves that you work harder when you

Croatian: 
know there is something there to personally gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result, Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence of property rights—and of the work/reward

Ukrainian: 
know there is something there to personally gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result, Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence of property rights—and of the work/reward

Icelandic: 
know there is something there to personally gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result, Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence of property rights—and of the work/reward

Macedonian: 
know there is something there to personally gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result, Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence of property rights—and of the work/reward

Vietnamese: 
know there is something there to personally gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result, Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence of property rights—and of the work/reward

iw: 
know there is something there to personally gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result, Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence of property rights—and of the work/reward

Danish: 
know there is something there to personally
gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal
ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph:
Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack
of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In
the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown
colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything
produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result,
Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who
were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence
of property rights—and of the work/reward

Filipino: 
know there is something there to personally gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result, Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence of property rights—and of the work/reward

Panjabi: 
know there is something there to personally gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result, Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence of property rights—and of the work/reward

Arabic: 
know there is something there to personally gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result, Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence of property rights—and of the work/reward

Italian: 
know there is something there to personally
gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal
ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph:
Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack
of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In
the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown
colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything
produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result,
Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who
were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence
of property rights—and of the work/reward

Finnish: 
know there is something there to personally
gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal
ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph:
Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack
of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In
the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown
colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything
produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result,
Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who
were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence
of property rights—and of the work/reward

Russian: 
know there is something there to personally gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result, Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence of property rights—and of the work/reward

Dutch: 
know there is something there to personally gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result, Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence of property rights—and of the work/reward

Modern Greek (1453-): 
know there is something there to personally
gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal
ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph:
Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack
of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In
the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown
colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything
produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result,
Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who
were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence
of property rights—and of the work/reward

Latin: 
know there is something there to personally gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result, Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence of property rights—and of the work/reward

Slovak: 
know there is something there to personally gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result, Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence of property rights—and of the work/reward

Polish: 
know there is something there to personally
gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal
ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph:
Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack
of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In
the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown
colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything
produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result,
Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who
were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence
of property rights—and of the work/reward

Chinese: 
know there is something there to personally
gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal
ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph:
Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack
of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In
the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown
colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything
produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result,
Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who
were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence
of property rights—and of the work/reward

Chinese: 
know there is something there to personally
gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal
ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph:
Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack
of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In
the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown
colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything
produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result,
Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who
were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence
of property rights—and of the work/reward

Swedish: 
know there is something there to personally
gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal
ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph:
Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack
of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In
the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown
colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything
produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result,
Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who
were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence
of property rights—and of the work/reward

German: 
weiß etwas gibt es von ihm, persönlichen Besitz der kommunalen persönlich zu gewinnen ist
Eigentum widerspricht persönliches Eigentum bezeichnet kommunaler Besitz gemeinsame Interessen, nicht Eigennutz.
Tom Bethell, der schrieb in ‚The Edelste Triumph: Eigentum und Wohlstand durch das Alter‘
erwähnt die Beziehung zwischen Arbeitnehmern Mangel an Anstrengung und das Fehlen von sicheren privaten
Eigentumsrechte. Tom Dilorenzo sagt: „In dem späten neunzehnten Jahrhundert, zum Beispiel,
Historiker Philip A. Bruce schrieb der Jamestown Kolonisten: „Die Siedler haben noch nicht einmal
ein modifiziertes Interesse im Boden. . . . Alles, was von ihnen produzierten ging in den Laden, in dem
sie keine Firma hatte.“Als Ergebnis Bruce schrieb, idled die Männer ihre Aufgaben über
oder verweigert insgesamt zu arbeiten. Auch Männer, die zu den am meisten sein allgemein bekannt waren,
energisch von der Natur waren Brach. Das Fehlen von Eigentumsrechten-und der Arbeit / Belohnung

English: 
know there is something there to personally
gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal
ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph:
Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack
of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In
the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown
colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything
produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result,
Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who
were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence
of property rights—and of the work/reward

Japanese: 
know there is something there to personally
gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal
ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph:
Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack
of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In
the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown
colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything
produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result,
Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who
were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence
of property rights—and of the work/reward

Serbian: 
know there is something there to personally gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result, Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence of property rights—and of the work/reward

Lithuanian: 
know there is something there to personally gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result, Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence of property rights—and of the work/reward

Turkish: 
know there is something there to personally gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result, Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence of property rights—and of the work/reward

French: 
know there is something there to personally
gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal
ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph:
Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack
of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In
the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown
colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything
produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result,
Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who
were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence
of property rights—and of the work/reward

Indonesian: 
know there is something there to personally
gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal
ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph:
Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack
of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In
the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown
colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything
produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result,
Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who
were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence
of property rights—and of the work/reward

Portuguese: 
know there is something there to personally gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result, Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence of property rights—and of the work/reward

Spanish: 
know there is something there to personally
gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal
ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph:
Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack
of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In
the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown
colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything
produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result,
Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who
were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence
of property rights—and of the work/reward

Hungarian: 
know there is something there to personally gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result, Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence of property rights—and of the work/reward

Korean: 
know there is something there to personally
gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal
ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph:
Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack
of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In
the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown
colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything
produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result,
Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who
were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence
of property rights—and of the work/reward

Norwegian: 
know there is something there to personally gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result, Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence of property rights—and of the work/reward

Malay (macrolanguage): 
know there is something there to personally gain from it, personal ownership which communal
ownership contradicts personal property, communal ownership denotes shared interests, not self-interest.
Tom Bethell who wrote in ‘The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity Through the Ages,’
mentions the relation between workers lack of effort and the absence of secure private
property rights. Tom Dilorenzo says: “In the late nineteenth-century, for example,
historian Philip A. Bruce wrote of the Jamestown colonists: “The settlers did not have even
a modified interest in the soil. . . . Everything produced by them went into the store, in which
they had no proprietorship.” As a result, Bruce wrote, the men idled over their tasks
or refused to work altogether. Even men who were generally known to be among the most
energetic by nature were derelict. The absence of property rights—and of the work/reward

Slovak: 
nexus that such rights create—completely destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife, such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention, this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work rate and effort drops and this fine example

Polish: 
nexus that such rights create—completely
destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife,
such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer
lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist
classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy
the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving
the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the
same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention,
this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover
that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise
their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work
rate and effort drops and this fine example

Vietnamese: 
nexus that such rights create—completely destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife, such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention, this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work rate and effort drops and this fine example

Modern Greek (1453-): 
nexus that such rights create—completely
destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife,
such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer
lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist
classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy
the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving
the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the
same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention,
this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover
that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise
their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work
rate and effort drops and this fine example

Italian: 
nexus that such rights create—completely
destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife,
such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer
lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist
classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy
the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving
the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the
same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention,
this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover
that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise
their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work
rate and effort drops and this fine example

Panjabi: 
nexus that such rights create—completely destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife, such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention, this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work rate and effort drops and this fine example

Finnish: 
nexus that such rights create—completely
destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife,
such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer
lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist
classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy
the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving
the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the
same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention,
this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover
that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise
their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work
rate and effort drops and this fine example

English: 
nexus that such rights create—completely
destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife,
such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer
lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist
classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy
the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving
the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the
same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention,
this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover
that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise
their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work
rate and effort drops and this fine example

Hungarian: 
nexus that such rights create—completely destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife, such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention, this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work rate and effort drops and this fine example

Arabic: 
nexus that such rights create—completely destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife, such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention, this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work rate and effort drops and this fine example

Spanish: 
nexus that such rights create—completely
destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife,
such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer
lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist
classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy
the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving
the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the
same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention,
this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover
that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise
their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work
rate and effort drops and this fine example

German: 
nexus, dass diese Rechte schaffen-vollständig die Arbeitsmoral der Siedler zerstört.“So
warum ist das passiert, warum war es so Streit, ein solcher Mangel an Arbeitsmoral aufgrund des Fehlens
der sichere private Eigentumsrechte? Die Antwort liegt in der ‚Trittbrettfahrerproblem‘ und
eng bezieht sich auf die guten alten sozialistischen Klassen Experiment, wenn Sie alle belohnen
in der Klasse mit der gleichen Klasse, können Sie den Anreiz und Arbeitsmoral diejenigen vernichten,
studieren die meisten und die am härtesten arbeiten. Geben den Narren auf der Rückseite der Klasse, die nicht der Fall ist
achten und ist der Klassenclown, die gleiche Klasse wie die Schüler auf der Vorderseite
Klasse, die Aufmerksamkeit hart und tut zahlen studiert, zerstört dies den Anreiz für jeden Schüler.
Wenn die am härtesten arbeitenden Menschen entdecken, dass unabhängig davon, was sie tun, ganz gleich,
wie viel studieren sie setzen in, wenn sie ihre finanzielle Belohnung ist das gleiche wie das realisieren
Klassenclown der Rückseite der Klasse, ihre Arbeitsleistung und Mühe Tropfen und dieses feine Beispiel

Malay (macrolanguage): 
nexus that such rights create—completely destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife, such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention, this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work rate and effort drops and this fine example

Macedonian: 
nexus that such rights create—completely destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife, such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention, this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work rate and effort drops and this fine example

Ukrainian: 
nexus that such rights create—completely destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife, such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention, this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work rate and effort drops and this fine example

Indonesian: 
nexus that such rights create—completely
destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife,
such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer
lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist
classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy
the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving
the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the
same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention,
this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover
that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise
their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work
rate and effort drops and this fine example

Filipino: 
nexus that such rights create—completely destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife, such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention, this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work rate and effort drops and this fine example

Lithuanian: 
nexus that such rights create—completely destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife, such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention, this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work rate and effort drops and this fine example

Japanese: 
nexus that such rights create—completely
destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife,
such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer
lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist
classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy
the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving
the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the
same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention,
this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover
that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise
their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work
rate and effort drops and this fine example

Portuguese: 
nexus that such rights create—completely destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife, such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention, this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work rate and effort drops and this fine example

Danish: 
nexus that such rights create—completely
destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife,
such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer
lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist
classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy
the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving
the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the
same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention,
this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover
that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise
their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work
rate and effort drops and this fine example

Serbian: 
nexus that such rights create—completely destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife, such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention, this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work rate and effort drops and this fine example

Russian: 
nexus that such rights create—completely destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife, such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention, this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work rate and effort drops and this fine example

Croatian: 
nexus that such rights create—completely destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife, such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention, this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work rate and effort drops and this fine example

Turkish: 
nexus that such rights create—completely destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife, such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention, this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work rate and effort drops and this fine example

Dutch: 
nexus that such rights create—completely destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife, such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention, this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work rate and effort drops and this fine example

Chinese: 
nexus that such rights create—completely
destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife,
such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer
lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist
classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy
the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving
the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the
same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention,
this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover
that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise
their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work
rate and effort drops and this fine example

Norwegian: 
nexus that such rights create—completely destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife, such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention, this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work rate and effort drops and this fine example

Korean: 
nexus that such rights create—completely
destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife,
such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer
lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist
classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy
the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving
the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the
same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention,
this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover
that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise
their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work
rate and effort drops and this fine example

iw: 
nexus that such rights create—completely destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife, such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention, this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work rate and effort drops and this fine example

Latin: 
nexus that such rights create—completely destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife, such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention, this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work rate and effort drops and this fine example

French: 
nexus that such rights create—completely
destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife,
such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer
lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist
classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy
the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving
the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the
same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention,
this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover
that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise
their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work
rate and effort drops and this fine example

Swedish: 
nexus that such rights create—completely
destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife,
such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer
lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist
classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy
the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving
the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the
same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention,
this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover
that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise
their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work
rate and effort drops and this fine example

Icelandic: 
nexus that such rights create—completely destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife, such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention, this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work rate and effort drops and this fine example

Chinese: 
nexus that such rights create—completely
destroyed the work ethic of the settlers.”So
why did this happen, why was there such strife,
such a lack of work ethic because of the absence
of secure private property rights? The answer
lies within the ‘free rider problem’ and
closely relates to the good old socialist
classroom experiment, if you reward everyone
in the class with the same grade, you destroy
the incentive and work ethic of those who
study the most and work the hardest. Giving
the fool up the back of class who doesn’t
pay attention and is the class clown, the
same grade as the student up the front of
class who studies hard and does pay attention,
this destroys the incentive for every student.
When the hardest working individuals discover
that regardless of what they do, no matter
how much studying they put in, when they realise
their financial reward is the same as the
class clown up the back of class, their work
rate and effort drops and this fine example

Lithuanian: 
was what led to the periodical famines across the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined, therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.” Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Russian: 
was what led to the periodical famines across the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined, therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.” Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Hungarian: 
was what led to the periodical famines across the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined, therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.” Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Panjabi: 
was what led to the periodical famines across the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined, therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.” Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Latin: 
was what led to the periodical famines across the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined, therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.” Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Japanese: 
was what led to the periodical famines across
the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes
on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high
marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved
to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets
and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined,
therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required
to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute
to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum
tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the
colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.”
Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November
of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Macedonian: 
was what led to the periodical famines across the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined, therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.” Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Chinese: 
was what led to the periodical famines across
the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes
on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high
marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved
to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets
and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined,
therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required
to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute
to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum
tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the
colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.”
Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November
of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Slovak: 
was what led to the periodical famines across the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined, therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.” Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Dutch: 
was what led to the periodical famines across the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined, therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.” Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Icelandic: 
was what led to the periodical famines across the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined, therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.” Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Malay (macrolanguage): 
was what led to the periodical famines across the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined, therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.” Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Spanish: 
was what led to the periodical famines across
the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes
on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high
marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved
to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets
and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined,
therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required
to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute
to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum
tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the
colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.”
Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November
of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Modern Greek (1453-): 
was what led to the periodical famines across
the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes
on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high
marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved
to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets
and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined,
therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required
to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute
to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum
tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the
colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.”
Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November
of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Indonesian: 
was what led to the periodical famines across
the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes
on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high
marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved
to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets
and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined,
therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required
to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute
to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum
tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the
colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.”
Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November
of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Turkish: 
was what led to the periodical famines across the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined, therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.” Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November of 1620 where they had communal ownership

French: 
was what led to the periodical famines across
the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes
on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high
marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved
to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets
and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined,
therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required
to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute
to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum
tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the
colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.”
Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November
of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Serbian: 
was what led to the periodical famines across the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined, therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.” Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Portuguese: 
was what led to the periodical famines across the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined, therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.” Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Italian: 
was what led to the periodical famines across
the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes
on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high
marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved
to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets
and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined,
therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required
to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute
to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum
tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the
colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.”
Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November
of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Norwegian: 
was what led to the periodical famines across the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined, therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.” Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November of 1620 where they had communal ownership

German: 
war das, was in der ganzen Welt zu den periodischen Hungersnot geführt und ist die Einhegungsbewegung warum
wurde an Ort und Stelle gebracht. Als Tom Dilorenzo geht weiter zu sagen: „Im Jahr 1611, die britische Regierung
Sir Thomas Dale verschickt als „hoch Marschall“ der Virginia-Kolonie zu dienen. Dale bemerkt
dass, obwohl die meisten der Siedler zu Tode gehungert hatten, verbrachten die restlichen
viel von ihrer Zeit spielt in den Straßen spielen und er sofort das Problem erkannt:
das System der kommunalen Besitz. Er bestimmt also, dass jeder Mensch in der Kolonie würde
werden drei Morgen Land gegeben und benötigt nicht mehr als einen Monat pro Jahr zu arbeiten, und
nicht beim Pflanzen oder Erntezeit, an den Fiskus der Kolonie beitragen. Die Bauern
erforderlich wäre, um die Kolonie eine pauschale Steuer von zweieinhalb Barrel Mais zu zahlen. Privatgelände
Haus wurde so in Position gebracht, und die Kolonie begann sofort zu gedeihen. "Sie
kann argumentieren: „, aber das ist nur ein Beispiel“ Ein weiteres gutes Beispiel waren 101 Siedler, die
ließ sich in der Region Cape Cod im November 1620, wo sie kommunalen Besitz hatte

Ukrainian: 
was what led to the periodical famines across the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined, therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.” Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Filipino: 
was what led to the periodical famines across the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined, therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.” Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Korean: 
was what led to the periodical famines across
the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes
on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high
marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved
to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets
and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined,
therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required
to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute
to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum
tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the
colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.”
Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November
of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Arabic: 
was what led to the periodical famines across the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined, therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.” Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Polish: 
was what led to the periodical famines across
the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes
on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high
marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved
to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets
and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined,
therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required
to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute
to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum
tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the
colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.”
Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November
of 1620 where they had communal ownership

iw: 
was what led to the periodical famines across the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined, therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.” Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Chinese: 
was what led to the periodical famines across
the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes
on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high
marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved
to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets
and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined,
therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required
to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute
to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum
tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the
colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.”
Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November
of 1620 where they had communal ownership

English: 
was what led to the periodical famines across
the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes
on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high
marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved
to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets
and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined,
therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required
to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute
to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum
tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the
colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.”
Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November
of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Vietnamese: 
was what led to the periodical famines across the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined, therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.” Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Croatian: 
was what led to the periodical famines across the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined, therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.” Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Danish: 
was what led to the periodical famines across
the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes
on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high
marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved
to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets
and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined,
therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required
to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute
to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum
tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the
colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.”
Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November
of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Swedish: 
was what led to the periodical famines across
the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes
on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high
marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved
to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets
and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined,
therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required
to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute
to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum
tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the
colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.”
Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November
of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Finnish: 
was what led to the periodical famines across
the world and is why the Enclosure Movement
was brought into place. As Tom Dilorenzo goes
on to say: “In 1611, the British government
sent Sir Thomas Dale to serve as the “high
marshal” of the Virginia colony. Dale noted
that although most of the settlers had starved
to death, the remaining ones were spending
much of their time playing games in the streets
and he immediately identified the problem:
the system of communal ownership. He determined,
therefore, that each man in the colony would
be given three acres of land and be required
to work no more than one month per year, and
not at planting or harvest time, to contribute
to the treasury of the colony. The farmers
would be required to pay the colony a lump-sum
tax of two and a half barrels of corn. Private
property was thus put into place, and the
colony immediately began to prosper. ”You
may argue: “but that’s just one example.”
Another fine example were 101 settlers who
settled into the Cape Cod region in November
of 1620 where they had communal ownership

Korean: 
of land, within a couple of months half of
those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from
England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most
important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure
Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private
property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple
between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy
of the commons all over again with the centralisation
under the Soviet Union and China in the Great
Leap Forward that collectively saw an estimated
100 million people starved to death, yet remarkably,
despite the mountain’s of historical evidence

Dutch: 
of land, within a couple of months half of those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy of the commons all over again with the centralisation
onder de Sovjet-Unie en China in de Grote Sprong Voorwaarts die gezamenlijk zag een geschatte
100 miljoen mensen uitgehongerd tot de dood, maar toch opmerkelijk, ondanks de berg van historisch bewijs

Hungarian: 
of land, within a couple of months half of those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy of the commons all over again with the centralisation
alatt a Szovjetunió és Kína a nagy ugrás, hogy közösen látta becsült
100 millió ember halt éhen, mégis figyelemre méltó, hogy annak ellenére, hogy a hegy történelmi bizonyíték

Slovak: 
of land, within a couple of months half of those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy of the commons all over again with the centralisation
under the Soviet Union and China in the Great
Leap Forward that collectively saw an estimated
100 million people starved to death, yet remarkably,
despite the mountain’s of historical evidence

Turkish: 
of land, within a couple of months half of those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy of the commons all over again with the centralisation
Büyük Atılım Sovyetler Birliği ve Çin altında olduğunu topluca tahmini gördü
100 milyon kişi dağ tarihsel kanıta rağmen oldukça açlıktan, henüz

Filipino: 
of land, within a couple of months half of those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy of the commons all over again with the centralisation
under the Soviet Union and China in the Great
Leap Forward that collectively saw an estimated
100 million people starved to death, yet remarkably,
despite the mountain’s of historical evidence

Croatian: 
of land, within a couple of months half of those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy of the commons all over again with the centralisation
under the Soviet Union and China in the Great
Leap Forward that collectively saw an estimated
100 million people starved to death, yet remarkably,
despite the mountain’s of historical evidence

Spanish: 
of land, within a couple of months half of
those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from
England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most
important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure
Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private
property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple
between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy
of the commons all over again with the centralisation
bajo la Unión Soviética y China en el gran salto adelante que vieron colectivamente un estimado
100 millones de personas murieron de hambre, sin embargo, notablemente, a pesar de la evidencia histórica de la montaña

Modern Greek (1453-): 
of land, within a couple of months half of
those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from
England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most
important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure
Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private
property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple
between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy
of the commons all over again with the centralisation
σύμφωνα με τη Σοβιετική Ένωση και την Κίνα στο Μεγάλο Άλμα προς τα εμπρός που είδε συλλογικά μια αναμενόμενη
100 εκατομμύρια άνθρωποι πέθαναν από την πείνα, αλλά εντυπωσιακά, παρά το βουνό των ιστορικών στοιχείων

Arabic: 
of land, within a couple of months half of those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy of the commons all over again with the centralisation
under the Soviet Union and China in the Great
Leap Forward that collectively saw an estimated
100 million people starved to death, yet remarkably,
despite the mountain’s of historical evidence

French: 
of land, within a couple of months half of
those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from
England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most
important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure
Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private
property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple
between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy
of the commons all over again with the centralisation
under the Soviet Union and China in the Great
Leap Forward that collectively saw an estimated
100 million people starved to death, yet remarkably,
despite the mountain’s of historical evidence

Panjabi: 
of land, within a couple of months half of those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy of the commons all over again with the centralisation
under the Soviet Union and China in the Great
Leap Forward that collectively saw an estimated
100 million people starved to death, yet remarkably,
despite the mountain’s of historical evidence

Latin: 
of land, within a couple of months half of those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy of the commons all over again with the centralisation
under the Soviet Union and China in the Great
Leap Forward that collectively saw an estimated
100 million people starved to death, yet remarkably,
despite the mountain’s of historical evidence

English: 
of land, within a couple of months half of
those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from
England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most
important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure
Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private
property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple
between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy
of the commons all over again with the centralisation
under the Soviet Union and China in the Great
Leap Forward that collectively saw an estimated
100 million people starved to death, yet remarkably,
despite the mountain’s of historical evidence

Serbian: 
of land, within a couple of months half of those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy of the commons all over again with the centralisation
под Совјетског Савеза и Кине у Великог скока напред да колективно видели процењени
100 милиона људи умрло од глади, али невероватно, упркос планина је од историјских доказа

Malay (macrolanguage): 
of land, within a couple of months half of those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy of the commons all over again with the centralisation
di bawah Kesatuan Soviet dan China di Great Leap Forward yang secara kolektif menyaksikan anggaran
100 juta orang mati kebuluran, namun amat, walaupun ini gunung bukti sejarah

Russian: 
of land, within a couple of months half of those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy of the commons all over again with the centralisation
under the Soviet Union and China in the Great
Leap Forward that collectively saw an estimated
100 million people starved to death, yet remarkably,
despite the mountain’s of historical evidence

iw: 
of land, within a couple of months half of those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy of the commons all over again with the centralisation
under the Soviet Union and China in the Great
Leap Forward that collectively saw an estimated
100 million people starved to death, yet remarkably,
despite the mountain’s of historical evidence

Indonesian: 
of land, within a couple of months half of
those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from
England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most
important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure
Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private
property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple
between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy
of the commons all over again with the centralisation
di bawah Uni Soviet dan China di Great Leap Forward yang secara kolektif melihat diperkirakan
100 juta orang mati kelaparan, namun sangat, meskipun gunung ini bukti sejarah

German: 
innerhalb von ein paar Monaten die Hälfte der Siedler Land, starben an Hunger. Nochmal,
weitere 100 Siedler wurden gegenüber England geschickt und sie kämpften zu füttern themselves.These
nicht die einzigen Beispiele waren, aber was am wichtigsten ist, von diesem, Großbritannien zu beachten
hat noch nie eine Hungersnot seit der Enclosure-Bewegung, die war die Bewegung, die gebracht konfrontiert
über das Privateigentum und sichere private Eigentumsrechte, war es das, was in erster Linie
Großbritanniens Bevölkerung mehr als verdreifacht zwischen 1760 bis 1919. Später in den frühen führte
zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts würden wir die Tragik der Allmende alle immer wieder mit der Zentralisierung sehen
unter der Sowjetunion und China im Großen Sprung nach vorn sahen, die zusammen ein geschätzte
100 Millionen Menschen verhungert, aber bemerkenswert, trotz des Bergs der historischen Beweise

Chinese: 
of land, within a couple of months half of
those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from
England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most
important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure
Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private
property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple
between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy
of the commons all over again with the centralisation
under the Soviet Union and China in the Great
Leap Forward that collectively saw an estimated
100 million people starved to death, yet remarkably,
despite the mountain’s of historical evidence

Icelandic: 
of land, within a couple of months half of those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy of the commons all over again with the centralisation
undir Sovétríkjunum og Kína í Stóra stökkið fram að sameiningu sá að áætlað
100 milljónir manna svelta til dauða, enn ótrúlega, þrátt fjallið er af sögulegum gögnum

Polish: 
of land, within a couple of months half of
those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from
England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most
important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure
Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private
property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple
between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy
of the commons all over again with the centralisation
w ramach Związku Radzieckiego i Chin w Wielkim Skoku że zbiorowo widział szacunkowo
100 milionów ludzi z głodu, a jednocześnie zadziwiająco mimo góra na historycznych dowodów

Danish: 
of land, within a couple of months half of
those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from
England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most
important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure
Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private
property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple
between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy
of the commons all over again with the centralisation
under the Soviet Union and China in the Great
Leap Forward that collectively saw an estimated
100 million people starved to death, yet remarkably,
despite the mountain’s of historical evidence

Lithuanian: 
of land, within a couple of months half of those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy of the commons all over again with the centralisation
pagal Sovietų Sąjungos ir Kinijos Didžiojo šuolio, kad kolektyviai pamačiau maždaug
100 milijonų žmonių alksta mirties, tačiau stebėtinai, nepaisant Mountain istorinių įrodymų

Italian: 
of land, within a couple of months half of
those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from
England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most
important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure
Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private
property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple
between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy
of the commons all over again with the centralisation
under the Soviet Union and China in the Great
Leap Forward that collectively saw an estimated
100 million people starved to death, yet remarkably,
despite the mountain’s of historical evidence

Japanese: 
of land, within a couple of months half of
those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from
England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most
important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure
Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private
property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple
between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy
of the commons all over again with the centralisation
under the Soviet Union and China in the Great
Leap Forward that collectively saw an estimated
100 million people starved to death, yet remarkably,
despite the mountain’s of historical evidence

Vietnamese: 
of land, within a couple of months half of those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy of the commons all over again with the centralisation
thuộc Liên Xô và Trung Quốc trong thời kỳ Đại Nhảy Vọt mà thấy chung một ước tính
100 triệu người chết đói, nhưng rõ rệt, mặc dù của núi bằng chứng lịch sử

Chinese: 
of land, within a couple of months half of
those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from
England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most
important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure
Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private
property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple
between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy
of the commons all over again with the centralisation
under the Soviet Union and China in the Great
Leap Forward that collectively saw an estimated
100 million people starved to death, yet remarkably,
despite the mountain’s of historical evidence

Macedonian: 
of land, within a couple of months half of those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy of the commons all over again with the centralisation
under the Soviet Union and China in the Great
Leap Forward that collectively saw an estimated
100 million people starved to death, yet remarkably,
despite the mountain’s of historical evidence

Norwegian: 
of land, within a couple of months half of those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy of the commons all over again with the centralisation
under Sovjetunionen og Kina i store spranget som samlet sett en estimert
100 millioner mennesker sultet i hjel, men likevel bemerkelsesverdig, til tross for fjellets av historiske bevis

Portuguese: 
of land, within a couple of months half of those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy of the commons all over again with the centralisation
sob a União Soviética ea China no Grande Salto Adiante, que coletivamente vimos um número estimado de
100 milhões de pessoas morreram de fome, mas curiosamente, apesar da montanha de evidências históricas

Swedish: 
of land, within a couple of months half of
those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from
England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most
important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure
Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private
property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple
between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy
of the commons all over again with the centralisation
under Sovjetunionen och Kina i stora språnget som kollektivt såg uppskattningsvis
100 miljoner människor svalt ihjäl, men anmärkningsvärt, trots bergets historiska bevis

Ukrainian: 
of land, within a couple of months half of those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy of the commons all over again with the centralisation
under the Soviet Union and China in the Great
Leap Forward that collectively saw an estimated
100 million people starved to death, yet remarkably,
despite the mountain’s of historical evidence

Finnish: 
of land, within a couple of months half of
those settlers died of starvation. Again,
another 100 settlers were sent across from
England and they struggled to feed themselves.These
were not the only examples, but what is most
important to note from this, Great Britain
has never faced a famine ever since the Enclosure
Movement, which was the movement that brought
about private ownership and secure private
property rights, it was that which primarily
led Britain’s population to more than triple
between 1760 to 1919. Later into the early
twentieth-century we would see the tragedy
of the commons all over again with the centralisation
under the Soviet Union and China in the Great
Leap Forward that collectively saw an estimated
100 million people starved to death, yet remarkably,
despite the mountain’s of historical evidence

Croatian: 
stacked against socialist sympathisers, they
somehow believe that the idea is greater than
real-world examples, questioning, how many
more people need to die for these people to
take the hint?

Icelandic: 
staflað gegn sósíalískum sympathizers, telja þeir einhvern veginn að hugmyndin er meiri en
dæmi raunverulegur-veröld, eftirgrennslan, þarf hversu margir fleiri fólk að deyja fyrir þetta fólk að
taka vísbending?

French: 
stacked against socialist sympathisers, they
somehow believe that the idea is greater than
real-world examples, questioning, how many
more people need to die for these people to
take the hint?

Macedonian: 
stacked against socialist sympathisers, they
somehow believe that the idea is greater than
real-world examples, questioning, how many
more people need to die for these people to
take the hint?

Portuguese: 
empilhadas contra simpatizantes socialistas, que de alguma forma acreditam que a idéia é maior do que
exemplos do mundo real, questionamento, quantas mais pessoas precisam morrer para que essas pessoas
tomar a dica?

Filipino: 
stacked against socialist sympathisers, they
somehow believe that the idea is greater than
real-world examples, questioning, how many
more people need to die for these people to
take the hint?

Polish: 
ułożone przeciwko socjalistycznych sympatyków, jakoś uwierzyć, że pomysł jest większa niż
przykłady rzeczywistego świata, pytając, ile więcej ludzi musi umrzeć dla tych ludzi
wziąć wskazówkę?

Indonesian: 
ditumpuk terhadap simpatisan sosialis, mereka entah bagaimana percaya bahwa gagasan adalah lebih besar dari
contoh-contoh nyata, pertanyaan, berapa banyak orang perlu mati untuk orang-orang untuk
mengambil petunjuk?

English: 
stacked against socialist sympathisers, they
somehow believe that the idea is greater than
real-world examples, questioning, how many
more people need to die for these people to
take the hint?

Japanese: 
stacked against socialist sympathisers, they
somehow believe that the idea is greater than
real-world examples, questioning, how many
more people need to die for these people to
take the hint?

Arabic: 
stacked against socialist sympathisers, they
somehow believe that the idea is greater than
real-world examples, questioning, how many
more people need to die for these people to
take the hint?

Modern Greek (1453-): 
στοιβάζονται κατά της σοσιαλιστικής συμπαθούντες, που με κάποιο τρόπο πιστεύουν ότι η ιδέα είναι μεγαλύτερη από
πραγματικό κόσμο παραδείγματα, ερωτήσεις, πόσοι περισσότεροι άνθρωποι πρέπει να πεθάνουν για αυτούς τους ανθρώπους να
να λάβει την υπόδειξη;

Norwegian: 
stablet mot sosialistiske sympatisører, de liksom tror at ideen er større enn
virkelige eksempler, avhør, hvor mange flere mennesker må dø for disse menneskene til
ta hintet?

Chinese: 
stacked against socialist sympathisers, they
somehow believe that the idea is greater than
real-world examples, questioning, how many
more people need to die for these people to
take the hint?

Slovak: 
stacked against socialist sympathisers, they
somehow believe that the idea is greater than
real-world examples, questioning, how many
more people need to die for these people to
take the hint?

Serbian: 
стацк против социјалистичких симпатизера, они некако верују да је идеја већи од
примери из стварног света, испитивање, колико још људи треба да умре за ове људе у
схватити наговештај?

Russian: 
stacked against socialist sympathisers, they
somehow believe that the idea is greater than
real-world examples, questioning, how many
more people need to die for these people to
take the hint?

Finnish: 
stacked against socialist sympathisers, they
somehow believe that the idea is greater than
real-world examples, questioning, how many
more people need to die for these people to
take the hint?

Spanish: 
apilados contra simpatizantes socialistas, que de alguna manera creen que la idea es mayor que
ejemplos del mundo real, el cuestionamiento, cuántas personas más tienen que morir para que estas personas
¿toma la pista?

Dutch: 
gestapeld tegen de socialistische sympathisanten, ze een of andere manier geloven dat het idee groter is dan
real-world voorbeelden, vragen, moeten hoe veel meer mensen voor deze mensen om te sterven
neem de hint?

Chinese: 
stacked against socialist sympathisers, they
somehow believe that the idea is greater than
real-world examples, questioning, how many
more people need to die for these people to
take the hint?

Danish: 
stacked against socialist sympathisers, they
somehow believe that the idea is greater than
real-world examples, questioning, how many
more people need to die for these people to
take the hint?

Panjabi: 
stacked against socialist sympathisers, they
somehow believe that the idea is greater than
real-world examples, questioning, how many
more people need to die for these people to
take the hint?

Swedish: 
staplade mot socialistiska sympatisörer, de på något sätt tror att tanken är större än
verkliga exempel, ifrågasättande, hur många fler människor måste dö för dessa människor att
ta ledtråden?

Lithuanian: 
sukrauti prieš socialistinių šalininkų, jie kažkaip manau, kad idėja yra didesnis nei
realaus pasaulio pavyzdžius, apklausa, kiek daugiau žmonės turi mirti šiems žmonėms
imtis užuomina?

Turkish: 
sosyalist sempatizanlarına karşı yığılmış, onlar nasılsa fikri daha büyük olduğuna inanıyoruz
gerçek dünya örnekleri, sorgulama, daha kaç kişi bu insanlara ölmek gerekir
hint almak?

Hungarian: 
halmozott ellen szocialista szimpatizánsok valahogy úgy vélik, hogy az ötlet nagyobb
valós példák, kihallgatás, hány embernek kell meghalni, hogy ezek az emberek
veszi az adást?

Korean: 
stacked against socialist sympathisers, they
somehow believe that the idea is greater than
real-world examples, questioning, how many
more people need to die for these people to
take the hint?

Latin: 
stacked against socialist sympathisers, they
somehow believe that the idea is greater than
real-world examples, questioning, how many
more people need to die for these people to
take the hint?

Vietnamese: 
xếp chồng lên nhau chống lại cảm tình viên xã hội chủ nghĩa, họ bằng cách nào đó tin rằng ý tưởng là lớn hơn
ví dụ thực tế, đặt câu hỏi, có bao nhiêu càng có nhiều người cần phải chết cho những người này để
lấy gợi ý?

iw: 
stacked against socialist sympathisers, they
somehow believe that the idea is greater than
real-world examples, questioning, how many
more people need to die for these people to
take the hint?

Ukrainian: 
stacked against socialist sympathisers, they
somehow believe that the idea is greater than
real-world examples, questioning, how many
more people need to die for these people to
take the hint?

German: 
gestapelt gegen sozialistische Sympathisanten, glauben sie, irgendwie, dass die Idee größer als
Praxisbeispiele, fragend, wie viele Menschen für diese Menschen sterben müssen
nimm den Hinweis?

Italian: 
stacked against socialist sympathisers, they
somehow believe that the idea is greater than
real-world examples, questioning, how many
more people need to die for these people to
take the hint?

Malay (macrolanguage): 
disusun terhadap penyokong sosialis, entah bagaimana mereka percaya bahawa idea ini adalah lebih besar daripada
contoh dunia sebenar, mempersoalkan, berapa banyak lagi orang perlu mati untuk orang-orang ini untuk
mengambil petunjuk?
