TO UKRAINIAN AND THE 2020 DEBATE OVER INCOME EQUALITY.
OVER INCOME EQUALITY. NEWS TODAY FROM THE
NEWS TODAY FROM THE SELF-DESCRIBED DEMOCRATIC
SELF-DESCRIBED DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST.
SOCIALIST. WE WANT TO BEGIN WITH BREAKING
WE WANT TO BEGIN WITH BREAKING NEWS INSIDE THE JUSTICE
NEWS INSIDE THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT AND ANOTHER EXPLOSIVE
DEPARTMENT AND ANOTHER EXPLOSIVE AND UNUSUAL DEVELOPMENT.
AND UNUSUAL DEVELOPMENT. NBC NEWS REPORTING ATTORNEY
NBC NEWS REPORTING ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR TAPPED AN
GENERAL WILLIAM BARR TAPPED AN OUTSIDE PROSECUTOR TO REVIEW
OUTSIDE PROSECUTOR TO REVIEW TRUMP AIDE MICHAEL FLYNN’S CASE.
TRUMP AIDE MICHAEL FLYNN’S CASE. SOURCES ARE SAYING THE
SOURCES ARE SAYING THE INVESTIGATION COULD BE AIMED AT
INVESTIGATION COULD BE AIMED AT SEVERAL FORMER OFFICIALS.
SEVERAL FORMER OFFICIALS. TRUMP HAS REPEATEDLY CRITICIZED
TRUMP HAS REPEATEDLY CRITICIZED PUBLICLY AND THIS HIGHLY UNUSUAL
PUBLICLY AND THIS HIGHLY UNUSUAL MOVE FROM BARR COMING AFTER
MOVE FROM BARR COMING AFTER PUBLICLY SAID CONVICTED TRUMP
PUBLICLY SAID CONVICTED TRUMP AIDE ROGER STONE SHOULD HAVE HIS
AIDE ROGER STONE SHOULD HAVE HIS SENTENCE REDUCED.
SENTENCE REDUCED. WE’RE SEEING A PATTERN FROM BARR
WE’RE SEEING A PATTERN FROM BARR THAT IS BEGINNING TO EMERGE.
THAT IS BEGINNING TO EMERGE. ESSENTIALLY QUESTIONING ANYONE
ESSENTIALLY QUESTIONING ANYONE WHO TRIED TO INVESTIGATE TRUMP
WHO TRIED TO INVESTIGATE TRUMP OR HIS NEW YORK ALLIES.
OR HIS NEW YORK ALLIES. LOOKING AT REVIEWING ANYTHING
LOOKING AT REVIEWING ANYTHING POLITICALLY SENSITIVE AND THEY
POLITICALLY SENSITIVE AND THEY STARTED GRILLING LINE
STARTED GRILLING LINE PROSECUTORS IN THE WASHINGTON
PROSECUTORS IN THE WASHINGTON OFFICES ABOUT VARIOUS CASES.
OFFICES ABOUT VARIOUS CASES. AND NOW TRUMP’S ALLIES IN
AND NOW TRUMP’S ALLIES IN CONGRESS ARE DOING EXACTLY THE
CONGRESS ARE DOING EXACTLY THE SAME THING.
SAME THING. LEVERAGING THE POWERS OF
LEVERAGING THE POWERS OF GOVERNMENT BARR TAPPED JOHN
GOVERNMENT BARR TAPPED JOHN DURHAM.
DURHAM. AND THEN SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM
AND THEN SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM IS NOW DEMANDING DOJ EMPLOYEES
IS NOW DEMANDING DOJ EMPLOYEES INTERVIEW WITH THE SENATE
INTERVIEW WITH THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE ABOUT THE
JUDICIARY COMMITTEE ABOUT THE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION.
RUSSIA INVESTIGATION. TODAY, TRUMP BLUNTLY SAYING
TODAY, TRUMP BLUNTLY SAYING CO-INTERFERE IN WHATEVER
CO-INTERFERE IN WHATEVER CRIMINAL PROBE HE WANTS AND
CRIMINAL PROBE HE WANTS AND TRUMP’S ATTACK ON THE RULE OF
TRUMP’S ATTACK ON THE RULE OF LAW, AS YOU CAN MANNING, THAT
LAW, AS YOU CAN MANNING, THAT HAS BEEN A CONSTANT.
HAS BEEN A CONSTANT. >> EVERYBODY SEES WHAT’S GOING
>> EVERYBODY SEES WHAT’S GOING ON IN THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT.
ON IN THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT. I ALWAYS PUT JUSTICE NOW WITH
I ALWAYS PUT JUSTICE NOW WITH QUOTES.
QUOTES. >> WE HAVE THE WORST LAWS OF ANY
>> WE HAVE THE WORST LAWS OF ANY COUNTRY ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD.
COUNTRY ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD. >> JAMES COMEY WAS UNFAIR TO
>> JAMES COMEY WAS UNFAIR TO THIS COUNTRY.
THIS COUNTRY. WHAT DID HE WAS A DISGRACE.
WHAT DID HE WAS A DISGRACE. >> YOU A THESE INVESTIGATORS,
>> YOU A THESE INVESTIGATORS, THEY’RE DEMOCRATS.
THEY’RE DEMOCRATS. >> YOU HAVE TO GET RID OF
>> YOU HAVE TO GET RID OF JUDGES.
JUDGES. WE’RE BUCKING A COURT SYSTEM
WE’RE BUCKING A COURT SYSTEM THAT NEVER, EVER RULES FOR US.
THAT NEVER, EVER RULES FOR US. >> I THINK IT IS A KISS GRACE.
>> I THINK IT IS A KISS GRACE. AND MR. MUELLER HAS A LOT OF
AND MR. MUELLER HAS A LOT OF CONFLICTS ALSO.
CONFLICTS ALSO. >> MANY HAVE SAID YOU SHOULD
>> MANY HAVE SAID YOU SHOULD FIRE HIM.
FIRE HIM. >> ON THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
>> ON THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, I WOULD STAY UNINVOLVED.
I WOULD STAY UNINVOLVED. I MAY GET INVOLVED AT SOME POINT
I MAY GET INVOLVED AT SOME POINT IF IT GETS WORSE.
IF IT GETS WORSE. >> DO WE HAVE ANY INSIGHT AS TO
>> DO WE HAVE ANY INSIGHT AS TO WHY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM
WHY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR IS DOING THIS AND DOING IT
BARR IS DOING THIS AND DOING IT NOW?
NOW? >> WELL,.
>> WELL,. >> WHAT WE KNOW IS THE ATTORNEY
>> WHAT WE KNOW IS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ASKED IN THE EASTERN
GENERAL ASKED IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI TO LOOK
DISTRICT OF MISSOURI TO LOOK INTO THE FLYNN CASE,
INTO THE FLYNN CASE, SPECIFICALLY AT FLYNN’S FBI
SPECIFICALLY AT FLYNN’S FBI INTERVIEW AT THE CENTER OF HIS
INTERVIEW AT THE CENTER OF HIS CASE.
CASE. THAT’S WHERE HE PLED GUILTY TO
THAT’S WHERE HE PLED GUILTY TO LYING TO INVESTIGATORS IN A
LYING TO INVESTIGATORS IN A COOPERATION DEAL WITH ROBERT
COOPERATION DEAL WITH ROBERT MUELLER.
MUELLER. HE WHO IS SINCE SAID HE WANTS TO
HE WHO IS SINCE SAID HE WANTS TO WITH YOU W DRAW THAT PLEA AND HE
WITH YOU W DRAW THAT PLEA AND HE DIDN’T LIE DURING THAT
DIDN’T LIE DURING THAT INTERVIEW.
INTERVIEW. IT COMES AT A TIME WHEN HE IS
IT COMES AT A TIME WHEN HE IS SAYING HE DIDN’T DO THIS.
SAYING HE DIDN’T DO THIS. THAT THERE WAS SOMETHING
THAT THERE WAS SOMETHING UNTOWARD THAT HAPPENED WITH HIS
UNTOWARD THAT HAPPENED WITH HIS CASE AT THE SAME TIME THE
CASE AT THE SAME TIME THE PRESIDENT IS SAYING THAT MICHAEL
PRESIDENT IS SAYING THAT MICHAEL FLYNN IS GETTING, HAS GOTTEN A
FLYNN IS GETTING, HAS GOTTEN A RAW DEAL.
RAW DEAL. AND ALSO, A LOT OF FOCUS HAS
AND ALSO, A LOT OF FOCUS HAS BEEN ON THE ROGER STONE
BEEN ON THE ROGER STONE SENTENCING THAT HAPPENED THIS,
SENTENCING THAT HAPPENED THIS, THE ISSUE THAT HAPPENED THIS
THE ISSUE THAT HAPPENED THIS WEEK.
WEEK. A VERY SIMILAR THING WITH THE
A VERY SIMILAR THING WITH THE FLYNN CASE WHERE PROSECUTORS PUT
FLYNN CASE WHERE PROSECUTORS PUT FORWARD A SENTENCING
FORWARD A SENTENCING RECOMMENDATION THAT INCLUDED
RECOMMENDATION THAT INCLUDED PERHAPS SOME JAIL TIME FOR
PERHAPS SOME JAIL TIME FOR FLYNN.
FLYNN. THEY THEN PRESSURED THE
THEY THEN PRESSURED THE PROSECUTORS AND ULTIMATELY THAT
PROSECUTORS AND ULTIMATELY THAT SENTENCING WAS REVERSED.
SENTENCING WAS REVERSED. THEM, ACTUALLY, PROBATION WOULD
THEM, ACTUALLY, PROBATION WOULD BE FINE.
BE FINE. THE ISSUE IS THAT TO OBSERVERS,
THE ISSUE IS THAT TO OBSERVERS, IT LOOKS LIKE AN ATTEMPT BY THE
IT LOOKS LIKE AN ATTEMPT BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TO GET ANOTHER
ATTORNEY GENERAL TO GET ANOTHER BITE AT THE APPLE IN TERMS OF
BITE AT THE APPLE IN TERMS OF THE FLYNN CASE.
THE FLYNN CASE. THEY GO BACK TO JM, PETER
THEY GO BACK TO JM, PETER STRZOK, PEOPLE PRESIDENT TRUMP
STRZOK, PEOPLE PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS REALLY TARGETED AND SAY THEY
HAS REALLY TARGETED AND SAY THEY SHOULD FACE THEIR OWN CRIMINAL
SHOULD FACE THEIR OWN CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND HAVE NOT.
PENALTIES AND HAVE NOT. SO WHAT THE GOALS ARE, WHEN IT
SO WHAT THE GOALS ARE, WHEN IT WOULD FINISH, WE DON’T KNOW WHAT
WOULD FINISH, WE DON’T KNOW WHAT THE ANSWERS ARE.
THE ANSWERS ARE. >> YOU MENTIONED THE PROSECUTOR
>> YOU MENTIONED THE PROSECUTOR LOOKING IS THAT THIS FROM THE
LOOKING IS THAT THIS FROM THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI.
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. IS THAT IN ITSELF SOMEWHAT
IS THAT IN ITSELF SOMEWHAT UNUSUAL?
UNUSUAL? THAT YOU’RE BRINGING A
THAT YOU’RE BRINGING A PROSECUTOR VERY FAR REMOVED,
PROSECUTOR VERY FAR REMOVED, AWAY FROM THE TRAPPINGS OF
AWAY FROM THE TRAPPINGS OF WASHINGTON?
WASHINGTON? THE INER WORKINGINGS OF THIS
THE INER WORKINGINGS OF THIS PARTICULAR INVESTIGATION FROM
PARTICULAR INVESTIGATION FROM THE BEGINNING?
THE BEGINNING? TO HAVE A LOOK AT IT?
TO HAVE A LOOK AT IT? >> THAT’S A GREAT POINT.
>> THAT’S A GREAT POINT. IT IS VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT
IT IS VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR DID IN
ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR DID IN TERMS OF TAPPING THE U.S.
TERMS OF TAPPING THE U.S. ATTORNEY IN CONNECTICUT TO FOR
ATTORNEY IN CONNECTICUT TO FOR THE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION.
THE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION. THIS IS NOT SOMETHING PEOPLE I
THIS IS NOT SOMETHING PEOPLE I TALKED TO SAY IT IS TIM CAL, IF
TALKED TO SAY IT IS TIM CAL, IF THERE IS AN ISSUE, YOU THOUGHT
THERE IS AN ISSUE, YOU THOUGHT SOMETHING MAY NOT HAVE HAPPENED
SOMETHING MAY NOT HAVE HAPPENED CORRECTLY IN THE FLYNN CASE OR
CORRECTLY IN THE FLYNN CASE OR IN THE HANDLING OF THE INTERVIEW
IN THE HANDLING OF THE INTERVIEW BY THE TWO FBI AGENTS.
BY THE TWO FBI AGENTS. THEN WOULD YOU FIRST GO TO THE
THEN WOULD YOU FIRST GO TO THE FBI.
FBI. THERE ARE SYSTEMS IN PLACE
THERE ARE SYSTEMS IN PLACE WITHIN THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT.
WITHIN THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT. THERE’S AN INSPECTOR GENERAL
THERE’S AN INSPECTOR GENERAL WITHIN THE FBI.
WITHIN THE FBI. THERE ARE OFFICES TASKED WITH
THERE ARE OFFICES TASKED WITH LOOKING INTO WHAT MAY OR MAY NOT
LOOKING INTO WHAT MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE GONE WRONG.
HAVE GONE WRONG. TO REACH OUTSIDE INTO THE FIELD
TO REACH OUTSIDE INTO THE FIELD IS UNUSUAL IN AND OF ITSELF.
IS UNUSUAL IN AND OF ITSELF. >> ALL RIGHT.
>> ALL RIGHT. STAY WITH ME.
STAY WITH ME. I WANT TO ASK OUR FORMER FEDERAL
I WANT TO ASK OUR FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTORS, FIRST OF ALL
PROSECUTORS, FIRST OF ALL TORSION GIVE ME THEIR TAKE.
TORSION GIVE ME THEIR TAKE. GIVE ME YOUR TAKE ON WILLIAM
GIVE ME YOUR TAKE ON WILLIAM BARR’S DECISION TO OPEN AN
BARR’S DECISION TO OPEN AN INVESTIGATION.
INVESTIGATION. ESSENTIAL
ESSENTIAL ESSENTIALLY INTO THE FBI.
ESSENTIALLY INTO THE FBI. >> YES.
>> YES. SO THERE ARE INVESTIGATIONS AS
SO THERE ARE INVESTIGATIONS AS PEOPLE PERCEIVED AS THE
PEOPLE PERCEIVED AS THE PRESIDENT’S ENEMIES, AN
PRESIDENT’S ENEMIES, AN INTRODUCE McCABE, HILLARY
INTRODUCE McCABE, HILLARY CLINTON, JAMES COMEY.
CLINTON, JAMES COMEY. WHEN THEY’RE DONE IN GOOD FAITH
WHEN THEY’RE DONE IN GOOD FAITH AND THEY CLEAR THE NAMES OF
AND THEY CLEAR THE NAMES OF THOSE PEOPLE, BARR AND TRUMP
THOSE PEOPLE, BARR AND TRUMP ORDER DOOVERS.
ORDER DOOVERS. TODAY WE LEARNED THAT BARR HAS
TODAY WE LEARNED THAT BARR HAS APPOINT SOMEDAY RANDOM
APPOINT SOMEDAY RANDOM PROSECUTOR FROM ST. LOUIS TO
PROSECUTOR FROM ST. LOUIS TO LOOK AT THE MICHAEL FLYNN GUILTY
LOOK AT THE MICHAEL FLYNN GUILTY PLEA.
PLEA. WELL, MICHAEL FLYNN PLED GUILTY.
WELL, MICHAEL FLYNN PLED GUILTY. HE PUT HIS HAND UP AND SWORE
HE PUT HIS HAND UP AND SWORE UNDER OATH THAT HE COMMITTED
UNDER OATH THAT HE COMMITTED CRIMES.
CRIMES. THERE IS NO LEGAL REASON TO
THERE IS NO LEGAL REASON TO REEXAMINE THIS CASE.
REEXAMINE THIS CASE. IT IS ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF BARR
IT IS ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF BARR WEAPONIZING THE AWESOME POWER OF
WEAPONIZING THE AWESOME POWER OF THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TO CARRY
THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TO CARRY OUT TRUMP’S PART SANDAL
OUT TRUMP’S PART SANDAL POLITICS.
POLITICS. >> LET ME GET THAT SPECIFIC BIT
>> LET ME GET THAT SPECIFIC BIT THAT PAUL RAISED.
THAT PAUL RAISED. ABOUT THE FACT MICHAEL FLYNN
ABOUT THE FACT MICHAEL FLYNN RAISED HIS HAND AND SAID I AM
RAISED HIS HAND AND SAID I AM GUILTY OF WHAT YOU’RE ACCUSING
GUILTY OF WHAT YOU’RE ACCUSING ME OF DOING.
ME OF DOING. DO YOU KNOW LEGAL SYSTEM BETTER
DO YOU KNOW LEGAL SYSTEM BETTER THAN I DO.
THAN I DO. HOW RARE IS IT THAT THE
HOW RARE IS IT THAT THE GOVERNMENT COMES TO SOMEONE WHO
GOVERNMENT COMES TO SOMEONE WHO SAYS, I COMMITTED A CRIME AND
SAYS, I COMMITTED A CRIME AND THEY SAY, HEY, WE’RE GOING TO
THEY SAY, HEY, WE’RE GOING TO REINVESTIGATE THEY.
REINVESTIGATE THEY. SOMETHING DOESN’T LOOK RIGHT ON
SOMETHING DOESN’T LOOK RIGHT ON WHY YOU PLED GUILTY TO
WHY YOU PLED GUILTY TO COMMITTING THIS CRIME.
COMMITTING THIS CRIME. >> THAT’S A SOFTBALL QUESTION.
>> THAT’S A SOFTBALL QUESTION. LET ME TELL WHAT YOU A GUILTY
LET ME TELL WHAT YOU A GUILTY PLEA HEARING IS.
PLEA HEARING IS. PROFESSOR PAUL BUTLER CAN TELL
PROFESSOR PAUL BUTLER CAN TELL YOU THE SAME THING.
YOU THE SAME THING. WHEN A DEFENDANT GOES INTO A
WHEN A DEFENDANT GOES INTO A GUILTY PLEA HEARING, THEY RAISE
GUILTY PLEA HEARING, THEY RAISE THEIR HAND AND UNDER OATH, THEY
THEIR HAND AND UNDER OATH, THEY SAY I’M GUILTY.
SAY I’M GUILTY. MICHAEL FLYNN ONE OF THE BEST
MICHAEL FLYNN ONE OF THE BEST COMPANIES IN THE COMPANY
COMPANIES IN THE COMPANY REPRESENTING HIM.
REPRESENTING HIM. THERE WAS A STATEMENT OF FACT
THERE WAS A STATEMENT OF FACT THAT HE SIGNED.
THAT HE SIGNED. WHEN I DID HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS
WHEN I DID HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF GUILTY PLEAS, MYSELF OR
OF GUILTY PLEAS, MYSELF OR ASSUME ADVISED IN MY 30 YEARS
ASSUME ADVISED IN MY 30 YEARS WITH DOJ, THAT PERSON SIGNS
WITH DOJ, THAT PERSON SIGNS THAT.
THAT. THAT STATEMENT OF FACTS BACK’S
THAT STATEMENT OF FACTS BACK’S CONFESSION.
CONFESSION. THAT CAN BE USED IN A TRIAL IF
THAT CAN BE USED IN A TRIAL IF MR. FLYNN WITHDRAWS FROM THE
MR. FLYNN WITHDRAWS FROM THE PLEA.
PLEA. SO IF HIS PLEA IS REMOVED, IT IS
SO IF HIS PLEA IS REMOVED, IT IS AN APPARENT VICTORY.
AN APPARENT VICTORY. IF IT GOES TO TRIAL, HE WOULD BE
IF IT GOES TO TRIAL, HE WOULD BE A MORON IF HE DID, THE STATE OF
A MORON IF HE DID, THE STATE OF FACTS THAT HE AGREED TO WILL BE
FACTS THAT HE AGREED TO WILL BE EXHIBIT 1 OF THE GOVERNMENT.
EXHIBIT 1 OF THE GOVERNMENT. THAT’S HOW A GUILTY PLEA WORKS.
THAT’S HOW A GUILTY PLEA WORKS. IT IS RARE THAT A DEFENDANT
IT IS RARE THAT A DEFENDANT WITHDRAWS FROM A GUILTY PLEA AND
WITHDRAWS FROM A GUILTY PLEA AND IT IS DOUBLY RARE THAT A JUDGE
IT IS DOUBLY RARE THAT A JUDGE WILL ALLOW IT.
WILL ALLOW IT. >> THIS IS WHAT I THINK.
>> THIS IS WHAT I THINK. MY OPINION, HE SEEMS TO
MY OPINION, HE SEEMS TO CONTRADICT HIMSELF.
CONTRADICT HIMSELF. HE SAYS HE’S NOT INFLUENCED BY
HE SAYS HE’S NOT INFLUENCED BY PRESIDENT TRUMP.
PRESIDENT TRUMP. >> I CAME IN TO SERVE AS
>> I CAME IN TO SERVE AS ATTORNEY GENERAL.
ATTORNEY GENERAL. THE THING I’M MOST RESPONSIBLE
THE THING I’M MOST RESPONSIBLE FOR ARE THE THINGS BROUGHT TO ME
FOR ARE THE THINGS BROUGHT TO ME FOR DECISION.
FOR DECISION. I WILL MAKE THOSE DECISIONS
I WILL MAKE THOSE DECISIONS BASED ON WHAT I THINK IS THE
BASED ON WHAT I THINK IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO.
RIGHT THING TO DO. I’M NOT GOING TO BE BULLIED OR
I’M NOT GOING TO BE BULLIED OR INFLUENCED BY ANYBODY.
INFLUENCED BY ANYBODY. >> THIS IS THE SAME GUY WHO
>> THIS IS THE SAME GUY WHO SAID, THE PRESIDENT’S TWEETING
SAID, THE PRESIDENT’S TWEETING IS MAKING HIS JOB IMPOSSIBLE.
IS MAKING HIS JOB IMPOSSIBLE. SO HE’S LIKE, HEY, HE CAN TWEET
SO HE’S LIKE, HEY, HE CAN TWEET WHATEVER HE WANTS.
WHATEVER HE WANTS. IF THAT’S THE CASE, THEN WHY IS
IF THAT’S THE CASE, THEN WHY IS HE ALSO BY HIS OWN WORDS, SAYING
HE ALSO BY HIS OWN WORDS, SAYING HE’S NOT UNDER ANY KIND OF
HE’S NOT UNDER ANY KIND OF INFLUENCE?
INFLUENCE? >> IT IS HARD TO SQUARE.
>> IT IS HARD TO SQUARE. IT IS OBJECTION HE HAS TAKEN
IT IS OBJECTION HE HAS TAKEN DECISION THAT’S SEEM TO BE IN
DECISION THAT’S SEEM TO BE IN RESPONSE TO THE PRESIDENT’S
RESPONSE TO THE PRESIDENT’S TWEETS AND OUTRAGEOUS OVER TIME
TWEETS AND OUTRAGEOUS OVER TIME OF HE’S INSTALLED LAYERS OF
OF HE’S INSTALLED LAYERS OF POLITICAL OVERSIGHT ON THE SAME
POLITICAL OVERSIGHT ON THE SAME DEPARTMENT HE LEADS.
DEPARTMENT HE LEADS. HE’S THE BOSS.
HE’S THE BOSS. THERE ARE PROCEDURES IN PLACE.
THERE ARE PROCEDURES IN PLACE. THERE IS AN I.G.
THERE IS AN I.G. HE IS PUTTING THESE PEOPLE
HE IS PUTTING THESE PEOPLE THROUGHOUT WHO REPORT BACK TO
THROUGHOUT WHO REPORT BACK TO HIM.
HIM. I THINK THERE ARE TWO AUDIENCES
I THINK THERE ARE TWO AUDIENCES FOR IT.
FOR IT. THE FIRST IS PRESIDENT TRUMP AND
THE FIRST IS PRESIDENT TRUMP AND THE SECOND IS ONGOING CASES
