What can be inferred? 'it is possible',
'possible', this term brings subjectivity
that such a thing may happen and yes,
'there are voices for such a change'. So,
this may happen, you can't deny it.
Let's see, there's a better choice
somewhere. 'non-democratic', too strong, this
is not correct. 'This is not democratic in
modern sense', calling it 'non-democratic'
would be too extreme, this cannot be
inferred, bad choice. This is very hasty,
'will be soon replaced', this cannot be
inferred, that yes, 'there is a possibility
of replacement', that can be inferred, but
'will be soon replaced', that is hasty. 'one
can directly vote', this sounds absurd, the
entire argument is that people are not
able to vote directly for the
presidential candidate, they cannot be a
choice worse than this that says 'one can
directly vote'. The entire argument is
around people not being able to vote
directly, bad choice.
'people's choice', many students will go
for this; this is not a good choice
because it says 'generally'. It cannot be
inferred that 'generally people's choice'
is different from the 'electors' choice'.
Definitely, sometimes it would happen,
that's the whole point, but it generally
happens, this cannot be inferred. Such
buzzwords are very important on GMAT,
keep an eye for them because of this one
word, if it was 'sometimes', it would be a
fine choice, we will think about it. But, of course, here, it losses,  A wins.
