
English: 
The world we live in seems like it's in turmoil
whenever I turn on the TV, or my phone
It's another riot, another war
it makes my heart ache
when did the world...
become so violent?
Chapter 1: What is Violence?
(sighs)
I never thought
that my first video would be this hard

Chinese: 
現在的世界處於動亂當中
我打開電視、我滑開手機
又是一場抗議、一場戰爭
真是讓人心疼
這個世界…
甚麼時候變成這麼暴力？
（嘆氣）
我真的萬萬沒想到
我第一部影片要做這麼硬的話題

Chinese: 
但…
好吧！
既然我們要來硬的，我們就要一起
硬。起。來。
我想，我們應該先定義一下
暴力到底是甚麼？
我們常常在電視上看到的…
人的肉體被實體的物件攻擊
這當然是最簡單，最快速的定義
但是我們再深入一點點地看
BDSM是暴力嗎？
自殘是暴力嗎？
我想…大部分的各位可能會跟我一樣
覺得使用暴力來形容BDSM或是自殘
感覺有點怪怪的
但是…
為甚麼？
美國公共廣播公司的其中一個Youtube 頻道
對暴力的解釋為：
 
 
 
或者
我們不是…
學者

English: 
but...
alright, since we're going in hard, lets
Make. It. HARD.
I think the first step should be to define what violence is.
the stuff we see on TV, human bodies being assaulted by physical objects
it might be the simplest, fastest definition, but let's dig a bit deeper
Is BDSM violent?
Does self-harm constitute Violence?
I reckon, most of y'all probably, like me
think that using violence to describe these two is somehow...strange
but...why?
PBS idea channel on youtube
provides this definition:
“The potentially aggressive removal of an actor’s choice in a situation.”
Or...
We're not...
sChoLaRS

English: 
So let's put it this way.
Situations or actions that remove autonomy.
For their examples they provide
Laura E. Tanner's 1994 book
"Intimate Violence: Reading Rape and Torture in 20th Century Fiction"
and the definition of violence provided by it.
in the book Laura writes:
“While Freud associated scopophilia with the idea of
“taking other people as objects”
the same process of objectification underlies violence
in which violators ‘dehumanize their intended victims
and look on them not as people
but as inanimate objects.’
when we view BDSM through this perspective
we might be able to understand
why using 'violence' as a descriptor seems a bit off.
Because BDSM is a simulation of violence.

Chinese: 
所以我們換句話說
 
 
其中他例子有提到
勞啦‧潭娜 Laura E. Tanner
1994年在她
《親密暴力：解讀二十世紀小說強暴與酷刑》
的書中對暴力的解讀
書中勞拉提到
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
當我們用這個觀點來觀看BDSM的時候
我們好像可以理解
為甚麼用暴力來形容它
感覺不太適合
因為BDSM是一種暴力的模擬

English: 
In a healthy BDSM or master/slave relationship
the slave willingly hands over their autonomy to the master
This is also why some,
before entering these relations
will have safewords in place
safewords are usually something you won't say
in times of pleasure.
My safeword is...
Xi
Jin
Ping
If one feels like they are in danger or uncomfortable
during the process of SM roleplay
They will say their safeword to stop the roleplay.
During the process of SM
one of the actors find extreme pleasure
in being objectified, dehumanized...
Xi Jinping!
This is also why self harm doesn't feel violent

Chinese: 
在一個健康的BDSM或是主奴關係當中
奴是自願把自己的自主權交給主人的
這也是為甚麼
有些人在進入這種關係前
會先建立安全字
安全字通常是自己在極度享受的狀況下
不可能說出來的話
我的安全字是…
習
近
平
如果在SM當中一方感到自己處於危險
或者是不舒服的時候
可以隨時說出安全字
來中止角色扮演
在SM的過程當中
有其中一方是極度享受
被物化、被去人性
習近平！
這也是為甚麼自殘很難被貼上暴力的標籤

Chinese: 
因為自殘某程度上，是一種自主權的展現
斯洛維尼亞哲學家
斯拉沃熱．齊澤克
Žižek
分類暴力為兩大類
主觀暴力是我們前面所講的
他所提供的定義為
例如有人被毆打
客觀暴力相反的是
齊澤克又再細分客觀暴力為兩種
第一種
例如：仇恨言論或者是暗示的暴力
第二種是
例如：警方強押人民或者系統性的歧視
在這個地方可能會有一點點開始困難
你可能會想說
那…仇恨言論又怎麼會構成暴力呢？
為了了解這個

English: 
because, in a way, self-harm is a form of autonomy
Slovenian philosopher
Slavoj Žižek
Categorizes violence into two forms
Subjective violence and Objective violence
Subjective violence is what we mentioned before
the definition he provides is:
violence that is inflicted by a clearly identifiable agent of action
For example: someone getting beat up.
Objective violence, on the other hand, has no clear perpetrator.
Žižek further splits objective violence into two types
The first being symbolic violence
Ex: Hate speech or implied violence.
The second type, systemic violence
Ex: Systemic Oppression
Now here is where it might get a bit confusing
You might think
how does hate speech constitute violence?

Chinese: 
我們必須去從社會結構做觀察
當我們身為社會的多數族群時
我們的仇恨言論的效果
會剝奪他針對的少數族群，他們的人性
也會把他們的主體性取消掉
我們從台灣看看
我們放眼台灣，照照鏡子
當我們對原住民使用「番仔」這個詞的時候
會使對方所有在社會價值與他們的生命背景平面化
而去除他與社會建立的關係與人性
他在社會中沒辦法自己去定義自己的定位
而我們說出這句話
會強制的貼這個標籤到他們身上
並且去除他們對自己的定義的自主性
我有時候真的覺得
沒有人懂我當國王的苦
必須要做好多…好困難的決定

English: 
In order to understand this we must view it from a societal level
when we are a part of the majority in society
our hate speech has the effect of
taking away the humanity of the targeted minority.
at the same time canceling their own subjective identity.
Let's take a look at Taiwan
Take a haaaard long look in the mirror.
When we call native Taiwanese "hoan-á".
(Taiwanese, sort of means uncivilized outsider)
it devalues their role in society and their backgrounds
taking away their humanity and societal relations.
they are no longer able to self identify their own role
and by saying these words
we force upon them these tags
removing their autonomy in self-identity
Sometimes I feel
as if no one understands how hard it is to be king,
I must make so many..hard decisions

Chinese: 
我想你應該能夠感同身受吧
上課分組的時候
總是有人不懂得長進
不懂得為群體付出
這時候…
應該要有人來做一下壞人吧
只是壞人…
沒有人喜歡當啊
你是否可以明白？
我想你應該能夠明白吧
台灣的政治與社會結構
深深受美式的新自由主義影響
這個歷史源頭是來自於當時的韓戰時期
當時的南韓與北韓戰爭中
中國共產黨與蘇聯支持的對象為北韓

English: 
You know what I mean, right?
When we split into groups in class
there are always the ones who don't put the work in
who don't understand what a group means
When it comes to this...
Someone has to be the bad guy, right?
But no one likes being the bad guy.
Do you understand?
I'm sure you understand.
Chapter 2: Be Good
Taiwan's political and societal structure
is heavily influenced by American Neoliberalism
the history can be traced back to the Korean War
During the war between North Korea and South Korea,
The CCP and the Soviet Union supported North Korea

Chinese: 
相對，南韓有的是聯合國
尤其是美國的支持
為了抵抗中國共產黨
中華民國與美國開始親近
形成策略上的互利關係
他們一起變成 Best Friend
日後也因為這個關係，台灣的文化與思想上
也深深受美國的影響
那「新自由主義」是甚麼？
顧名思義這裡面最重要的兩個字
就是「自由」
但是，所謂的自由是真的存在嗎？
台灣現在同婚通過了
但是在這之前同志是無法結婚的
這是自由嗎
或者我為什麼會被禁止走在馬路上？
我不戴安全帽騎車，是我自己的生命危險
這不也是我的自由嗎？
當然我只是舉個例子
我還是希望各位保護好自己的安全
齊澤克對這個現象的觀察是
你被給予了自由的選擇權

English: 
South Korea, on the other hand, had the support of the United Nations
particularly the support of the US
In order to stand a chance against the CCP
The Republic of China (Taiwan) started to get closer with the US
forming a strategic partnership
they became best friends
Afterwards, because of this relationship
Taiwan was influenced by US culture
So what is Neoliberalism?
Neoliberalism focuses on the idea of "Freedom"
But, does freedom truly exist in this form?
Same-sex marriage is now legal in Taiwan
but before then same-sex couples were not allowed to get married.
Is this freedom?
Or, why am I not allowed to walk on the roads?
If I don't wear a helmet while riding a scooter, it's my won safety at risk,
but isn't that my freedom?
Of course, that is just an example
I hope everyone can stay safe.
Žižek observes that
you are given the freedom of choice

Chinese: 
但是前提是你...
務必做出「正確」的選擇
你被給予自由的前提是你不會真正的使用它
我在我房間中不傷害
或者是妨礙任何其他人的自由的狀況下
我想做的事情
這不是我的自由嗎？
我是台南人
我愛吃甜
我驕傲

English: 
with the precondition...
that you make the "correct" choice
you are given freedom with the precondition that you will not fully use it.
If I am in my own space
without harming or obstructing the freedom of others
isn't what I do
the matter of my own freedom?
I'm from Tainan
I like sugar
and I'm proud of it.

Chinese: 
暴力
在我們民主時代
是沒有任何存在空間的
我們身為文民的國家
我們的責任是必須阻止所有暴力
我們國家的安危是建立在和平的溝通之上

English: 
Violence
has no place to exist
in our democracy.
We, as a civilized country
must stop all forms of violence
The security of our country is built on civil discourse

Chinese: 
這一些…是我們必須要守護的價值
2016年3月11號
在一個川普的造勢晚會外圍發生了暴力的衝突
隔天當時的美國總統候選人希拉蕊
發布了一則聲明
暴力在我們的政治裡沒有任何的存在的空間
但是說出這句話的希拉蕊
同時支持美國進攻伊拉克
提供武器給敘利亞
所以我們可以從此觀察到
希拉蕊其實暗示的是不正當的暴力
但是我們又要怎麼分辨
正當與不正當的暴力呢？
馬克思·韋伯在《以政治為志業》中說
國家就是在某個固定疆域內
肯定自身對武力的正當使用
壟斷權力的人類共同體
所以在這種情況國家掌握了所有的暴力
形成了暴力壟斷

English: 
we must defend these values
on the 11th of March 2016
there was a violence clash outside of a Trump rally
the next day, presidential nominee, Hillary Clinton
released a statement:
but Hillary also
supported the invasion of Iraq
imported weapons into Syria
so what we might infer from this
is that Hillary was referring to "illegitimate violence"
but how do we differentiate
"legitimate violence" from "illegitimate violence"?
In "Politics as a Vocation" Mark Weber says
that the state is a "human community that
claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of violence
within a given territory."
So under these circumstances the state holds an monopoly on violence.

English: 
So legitimate violence can be defined as
"Violence used or approved by the state"
So...when someone tells you to be a useful person
the definition of whether your actions have use or value
whether they are legitimate is held by those in power
the "correct" choice you are given
is to take actions that benefit those with power.
is to take actions that benefit those with p̷̡̛̳̱͇̳̦̃͑̓͋̅̄̏̈́͊̌̕ǫ̷̡̛̦͔͖̫̠̦̖͇̙͖͓̭̘͊͑͒͗͋̇͝ẁ̵̡̨̧͙̙̙̜̪̤̫̝͇e̴̜̾̃̀͂̎̽͂̌̔͝͝r̴̬̠͙̈̎͝͝.̷̡̗̺̲͚̘͔͇̒ͅ
As the leader of a democratic country
I must put the happiness, safety, and well being of our people first.
I am a civil servant
I serve the masses
Chapter 3: Violence and Me
When reviewing Žižek's book
Simon Critchley opened with a joke
two men, having had a drink or two, go to the theatre,
where they become

Chinese: 
而正當的暴力的定義則為：
「由國家使用或者是核准的暴力行為」
所以…
當有一個人說要當個有用的人
你的行為在社會上有沒有價值
與正不正當這個定義
是在掌權的人手上
你被提供「正確」的選擇
是做出對掌權的人有利的事
是做出對掌權的人有是̣͑做̏͛̌出̮͎̲͒ͅ出̮͎̲͒ͅ
我身為一個民主國家的領導人
必須要考量的是最多數人的
快樂
平安
幸福
健康
我是國家的公僕
是為人民服務
在評論齊澤克的書時
西蒙·克爾齊李提供了一則笑話
兩個人在喝了幾杯酒之後走到劇場內看戲
兩個人都覺得很無聊很想死

English: 
thoroughly bored with the play.
One feels a pressing need to urinate,
so he tells his friend to mind his seat while he goes to find a toilet.
"I think I saw one down the corridor outside," says his friend.
The man wanders down the corridor, but finds no WC.
Wandering further,
he walks through a door
and sees a plant pot.
He shrugs
and after copiously urinating into it,
he returns to his seat.
His friend says,
"What a pity!
You missed the best part.
Some fellow just came on the stage
and pissed in that plant pot."
This joke is reminiscent of our relationship with violence in society
we often observe at a distance the violence that happens on "the stage"
and maybe we have the primal urges like the need to urinate
but while we attempt to live our life instinctively
we often lose the objectivity of the role we play.
If we want to understand violence
we must take a more pragmatic, objective approach
we mustn't subjectively judge violence as inherently good or bad

Chinese: 
還有一點點森七七
其中一位開始尿急
於是她開始找廁所
他朋友告訴他廁所在走廊走下去
可是他怎麼找都找不到廁所
於是他繼續走下去
看到一扇門
推開發現有一個盆栽
他聳了個肩
索性的尿到盆栽中
他回到座位時
他朋友很興奮的告訴他
哎呀！真的是太可惜了！
你錯過最精彩的一段
有人走上舞台
尿在盆栽中耶
這則笑話呈現了我們與社會暴力的關係
我們很容易冷冷看著社會舞台上的暴力
或許對其中幾件事情有尿急這種生理反應
但在我們急著直覺式的過著我們生活同時
我們失去了客觀看待我們在這齣戲扮演的角色
如果我們要了解暴力
我們必須比較務實、客觀的角度看
我們不要有一個很主觀的判斷暴力好壞

Chinese: 
而是退一步
更能看見他存在的地方
尋找因果與相對關係
我們可以很快速的說我們反對所有暴力
但是我們反對的暴力是否只限於我們清楚看見的
在舞台上出現，特別強眼的
美國知名炸雞連鎖店為了少繳一點稅金
部分的收入捐給慈善機構
但是這些慈善機構極度恐同
支持使用電療法轉化同志
如果我買了這些炸雞
我是否有參與這個暴力行為
如果我看見同學在學校被圍毆
但是我不做出幫助他的動作
我是否有參與暴力
如果被圍毆的同學
為了保護自己反手
而學校決定因為被圍毆的同學也有反手
所以雙方都有錯
這個合理嗎
我們再放大看

English: 
rather we should take a step back
as to see the places in which it exists
and search for the relations or cause and effect of it
of course we can rush to declare that we oppose violence in all its forms
but the is violence we oppose limited to the type we can clearly see
the ones that appear on the stage, that are especially eye-catching
in order to pay less taxes, a certain fried chicken chain restaurant
donates its profits to charities.
But, these charities are overtly homophobic
supporting conversion therapy for gays.
If I buy chicken there,
am I involved in this violence?
If I see someone at school being attacked
and I don't do any action to help them
am I complicit in the violence
If the person being attacked
retaliates forcefully in an effort to defend themselves
and the school decides that because there was retaliation
so both parties are at fault
is this reasonable
let's take a step back

English: 
if civilians living under long-term objective violence
adapts a violent response
under these circumstances
if we are only able to see the subjective violence
and are blind to the objective violence
we might think that these protesters
these rioters are in the wrong.
I think that this is a bad take
without nuance
What about you?
There are many that wish to weaken the order of our country
It falls onto all of us to protect this order
in the process of protection
we must make some...difficult decisions
we provide everyone with the same resources
maybe you don't have time to study or your working hours are too long
But...
we believe that as long as you
are willing to take the legitimate path
you will reap the rewards
as for illegitimate acts
we must take action against them

Chinese: 
如果人民在長久的客觀暴力壓迫之下
採取暴力的方式回應
這種狀況下
如果我們能看見的只是主觀暴力行為
看不見客觀暴力
我們可能會覺得這些抗議者
這些暴民是非常不可取的
我會認為這種說法不完整
看的不夠仔細
你呢？
很多人是想要動搖我們國家的秩序的
而這個秩序是要我們共同守護
而在這個守護的過程
是必須要做一些…困難的決定
我們國家提供給所有人同樣的資源
或許你沒有時間讀書或者是工廠時間太長
但是…
只要你願意走正當的路
我們相信你一定
是有報應的
而我們面對不正當的行為
必須採取行動

Chinese: 
必須守護我們自己國家的價值
我最近聽說
有一些原住民
因為工廠汙染他們周遭的環境
他們決定霸佔工廠抗議
但是你我都知道
工廠他是私人的土地
他的購買過程、申請過程都是經過正當的程序
這些抗議者是不正當的行為
我們必須照著程序來
我想
你應該能夠理解吧
守護國家的秩序
人人有責
謝謝你花時間看這個作品
如果你喜歡的話可以幫我按一下訂閱的按鈕

English: 
we must protect our values
I've heard some news
about some natives
occupying a factory to protest
the destruction of their environment and their homes
but you and I know
factories are private property
they went through the legitimate process of acquirement
these protesters are illegitimate.
We must act accordingly.
I mean
you understand, right?
we must defend the order of our country.
It is up to all of us.
Thank you for watching this video
if you enjoyed it hit the subscribe button

Chinese: 
以及旁邊的鈴鐺來接受新的影片上傳的通知
我會想要做這部影片的原因很簡單
我想要盡量用比較有趣的方式來解釋一些困難的議題
我覺得我們可能很多人都有一種
過的不是很愉快的感覺
但是我們不知道怎麼去形容它或是去分析它
那我希望可以透過這些影片
跟大家一起探索
一起分享
一起成長
讓我們可以看清這些事情
這個頻道的構想花了我快要一年的時間
這部影片也因為沒有預算
所以花了好幾個月製作
未來我可能會想要講一些更深入的話題
有些話題可能對贊助商也沒有那麼的友善
所以如果喜歡與有能力的話
我下面會有斗內的連結
如果沒有意願或者是能力也沒關係
幫我多分享這也對我來講是很大的幫助
另外也可以在IG或者是臉書追蹤我
所有的連接都在影片下方
之後我也可能會做一些直播
讓有興趣的人可以跟我一起討論影片的內容

English: 
also turn on notifications for updates
the reason I wanted to do this video is simple
I wanted to try to make some difficult topics interesting
(I was also inspired by breadtubers)
I feel like a lot of us have a gut feeling
that we aren't really happy
but we don't know how to describe or analyze it
so I hope that through these videos
we can explore together
share together
grow together
that we can see through these problems
this channel has been a year in the making
and because this video had no budget
it took me months to make
in the future i hope to cover some deeper topics
some of them might not be so sponsor-friendly
so if you liked this video and have the ability
there's a button for donations in the description
if you don't want to do that, no worries
if you could share this video, it would also be of great help
also, follow me on instagram and facebook
links in the description
I might also do some livestreaming
(dunno how to make it bilingual tho lol)
if you are interested in discussing the video

English: 
or just for chatting.
Follow me to get the times I plan on doing this.
Thank you all for watching.
Thank you all for watching.

Chinese: 
或者是聊聊天
詳細的時間追蹤我來獲得消息
再次感謝大家的觀看
謝謝
