Paolo Barnard. Good evening Paolo.
Let's continue talking about the Brexit topic
and why it's important
maybe it might also create a domino effect.
I hope, I hope it will destroy this rubbish.
This illustration is very interesting.
There are three things to consider about BREXIT:
the Economy, the Nomenclature and the Democracy behind it
I have to give you some data, I'm sorry if I bore you,
but real journalism is also made up of data.
The economic implications:
if a British overlooks Dover's cliffs, what does he see?
He sees a Europe, that from 2007 to today has lost its GDP
to the point of not getting it back
he turns around to the other side, and sees an America
that from 2007 to today, has regained all of their GDP
and added 10% to the national wealth.
Not good for Europe.
He sees Euro with a balance of the current account of France, Italy, Spain
of 1200 billion euros, still in the red.
He sees an unemployment rate that is double of the one in the UK.
He sees a deflation, for which Draghi is in desperation
and sees banking gaps for 1.7 trillion euros in Europe, that nobody is covering.
They say that BREXIT will bring damage to the UK
well, Open Europe, the biggest Think Tank in Europe of economy and
politics and the European Commission data bank
give us the following data:
the maximum loss for the UK for the exit from the EU
is of 1% of GDP,
the maximum loss of the city of London, large financial center in the european business, is 1.1% of GDP.
Then there's the threaten to the commercial bloc
"the UK is going to leave Europe, commercial bloc!"
there's just one small detail that no-one considers
that Europe exports to the UK ten times more than what the UK exports in Europe
it will be very difficult for France, Germany, Italy and Spain etc. to lose billions of exports by blocking the UK.
Then there's the threaten of the loss of the single market,
there are 500 million of potential european consumers that are in great trouble
while the UK, deregulated and outside of EU
has "something like" 2.2 billion of potential customers in emerging countries
and then they say that BREXIT will affect companies
it's BS
it affects the 0,4% of the huge british companies
companies like Shell, BP, Glaxo, Vodafone and Unilever.
Let's now see the advantages of BREXIT, very quickly:
Freedom of deregulating the UK to have access to free trade treaties to 2.2 billion potential customers that they don't have today.
This is of great importance: no more financial losses for small and medium companies.
Now think about this, the small and medium british companies lose 760 million euros EACH WEEK
due to the suffocating, Soviet and authoritarian burocracy of Bruxelles.
The EU blocks the contestability to the british companies
this means, access with not boundaries to the market
also to the greatly boasted European market.
The UK exports 12% to the EU
but 100% of its economy is blocked by the suffocating laws of Bruxelles.
London, which could lose 1,1%, will be able to export 10% of the British GDP in the whole world
and the UK, other than having the biggest financial center in the world, has also another interesting thing:
Petroleum, and it's a great petroleum
because Brent has the largest reserves of any other European country.
There has been terrorism of the markets
"if the UK exits the EU, it will sink, will go to Africa, 3 million unemployed"
The historical memory here is not working:
in 1992, the UK was is a system similar to this one, it was called the European Monetary System.
They were kicked out. 
Everybody said: "It's the death of the UK"
It was the day that the UK, and the city of London left for "outer space".
Then there are the democratic implications, 
also very important,
the UK got rid of the nomenclature,
which we have talked about it on this show for years,
[the nomenclature] authoritarian, that has humiliated all the national parliaments of Europe.
In 1993 the German Constitutional Court emits a judgement that states: "The European Parliament is a NON-democratic tool."
Also, there is something else that has to be considered
the loss of the self-determination of European people.
Due to this nomenclature there have been great shifts [in power] towards the right wing
we have seen this in France with Le Pen
in Austria with Hofer
or with Golden Dawn in Greece.
Good, with the UK out of this trap it is now
 free from UKIP
the only British nationalist party of the right
that wins because the UK stays in Europe
now the British want to leave, from this Economicide, from this authoritarian EU and from this nomenclature
Then, for what are Bilderberg's men trembling for?
What are the huge companies afraid of?
No they're not scared of an economic loss,
they are scared of the loss of control over a neo-feudal, authoritarian and anti-democratic project called the European Union.
