Hello everyone and welcome back!
 
Before to start the video i would like to inform you that my channel
has been demonetized again for the 2nd time in 7 Oct 2019...
 
Before 1 month my channel was demonetized again for 3 months... 
 
In the monetization page it says that the reason that my channel
has been demonetized again is because of Reused Content...
 
Reused content they mean that i'm Repurposing someone else's content
without adding significant original commentary or educational value.
 
Can you believe this ???
This is LIE because all the content that i use is under Creative Commons Attribution license which it means reuse allowed by everyone in many ways and the content that i post is very helpful for most of the people.
 
In the description of each video i always provide the links from the sources of each video that i use.
 
It is illegal what they are doing. In my channel i have total 442 videos. 350+ videos are videos that i have made by my self with copper art etc. Why youtube has demonetized my entire channel?
If i make videos which are not waking up the people but are under creative common, youtube will have no problem to pay me but you see i make videos which are very very helpful for most of the people because they wake up and this is something that youtube don't want... 
 
You need to understand that the demonetization of any channel which is spreading the truth and is helping to wake up the masses, it is an unfair war against all of us because without these channels, we will not be able to learn the truth about many things in this upside down world...
Please, all of you which are supporting my channel, tweet about this
on @TeamYouTube @YouTube @YTCreators on twitter (and in any
other platform) so we can inform them and to get their attention to
check my channel because my channel has demonetized again by
mistake from the AI and the false flags which people of the slavery system are false reporting my channel in purpose. So please, let's
tweet on @TeamYouTube @YouTube @YTCreators about this unfair
decision to demonetize my channel again without doing anything
wrong and that the content that i post is very helpful for most of the people.
 
Thank you very much in advance!
NaTuberTv
you said he had some consultations about
that war but that war was launched under
a false pretext oh you actually
delivered that you can actually say
these things is a testament to the fact
that the world has come a long ways from
the days of the czars and the kings and
the queens and I'm the king off with
your head
you'd be put in prison for saying a
fraction of the things that you just
said but I wonder why why is it that
freedom of speech is considered to be
the domain of a Western democracies
freedom of speech freedom of science
freedom of exploration existed in a non
democratic I'm the king off with your
head is a problem when science guys
attempt to bully other people I mean
Nick you're had to say I'm not a denier
he had to get it up I'm not a denier
because really the science group has
tried to shame anyone who dares question
this and the point of visible however
the scare tactics have not worked it's
not working with the public I'm sorry no
you're not hold on the others it's not
true see you said you wouldn't talk like
I did okay I'm the King off with your
head if I don't apply the force then
it'll stay like some sort of mistake
you know potato shape so that's what
gravity is doing really it's activism
it's a force that squashing it down it's
not true and and it'll turn it into a
sphere because your act is the same in
every direction and and and it'll turn
it into a sphere it does it acts the
same in every direction that's not true
so so you spit you know when you spin
pizza dough it kind of flattens out gets
wider in the middle and so earth
throughout its life even when it formed
it was spinning it's not true and got a
little wider at the equator isn't it
those are the poles so it's not actually
a sphere it's in its oblate and
officially is an oblate spheroid that's
what we call it it's not true but not
only that it's slightly wider below the
equator than above you will chubbier
little chubbier yeah Chubby's a good way
it's like pear-shaped pear-shaped
pear-shaped pear-shaped that's not true
when I first heard this Flat Earth
subject I dismissed it without even
giving it a second thought
but more recently at the beginning of
2015 I ran across a few Flat Earth
videos again and while looking into the
fake moon photos circulating around I
saw that people were claiming that the
images from Earth from space were fake
as well pretty soon the Flat Earth
subject became viral online and after
looking at the Apollo missions one night
I'm coming to the conclusion that they
were nothing more than a huge gone gate
it jarred my memory about something and
for a very specific reason I decided to
look deeply into the Flat Earth without
just dismissing it blindly as so many do
why did I look into it this time I'd go
to the moon in a nanosecond it's not
true the problem is we don't have the
technology to do that anymore it's not
true we used to but we destroyed that
technology it's not true and it's a
painful process to build it back again
it's not true well I do pray for
knowledge and wisdom and discernment
but maybe the recent Apollo footage I
watched held however I live near a very
large lake Lake Ontario and I happen to
remember going to the beach as a kid and
looking across the lake and seeing new
york state coast off in the distance I
never ever thought anything about it
ever except I remember being there when
I went to the beach now I've been to
that Beach a hundred times over the
years and once this topic gained more
prominence in early 2015 the first video
I saw explain the curvature of the earth
and what it's supposed to be an inches
for life and it resonated with me
because I remember that I could see
clear across the lake to the other coast
something that broke all the sphere
Earth rules so with NASA fakery on my
mind and the memory has seen this
coastline that supposedly was too far
below the horizon for me to be able to
see it due to the curvature of the earth
I read or through and as unbelievable as
it seemed it started to make a lot of
sense especially since I did distinctly
remember being able to see that far
coast basically any time I was at my
Beach and as I said I've been there
hundreds of times over there but even so
I went back to the beach recently and
stood at the shore I look south and
guess what I could see the New York
State coastline just like I remember now
I googled the distance and it was
approximately 36 miles I learned what
the curvature of the earth is supposed
to be exactly at that distance and
according to the people that believed in
the sphere and I found out that the
coast should have been buried below my
ability to see it by almost 900 feet
that part of the New York State Coast
had a top elevation of less than 300
feet so that left at least a huge 600
foot discrepancy and even more because I
could see some of the height of the fog
shoulder was something really wrong with
the realities that they've been selling
us ever since we were born well I ended
up becoming a little fixated on proving
or disproving the concept at first I
truly thought disproving the flat earth
would be rather easy I thought there had
to be a reasonable explanation why I
could see so far beyond the so-called
curve barrier I learned about light
refraction in superior mirages I learned
about perspective and horizons I learned
about how our eyes work
I view dozens of similar experiences on
YouTube I listen to experts and people
who thought they had logical but
spherical explanations in fact I tried
for a few months to debunk the concept
it just couldn't the more I looked into
it the more sense it made and less
likely that the severe model we've been
spoon-fed since earth was a reality it's
just flat-out wrong and as more people
share their experiences and proofs
online it only added to my growing
pretty much unwavering belief that the
world is not what we're told and
learning about how our eyes work and how
perspective work helps a lot with
understanding sunrises and sunsets and
ships disappearing hull first at sea and
other suppose it's sphere earth proves I
can't say for certain what shape the
earth is about big it is or if there's
an Antarctic ring or a barrier beyond it
or if it's an infinite plane maybe
everything we theorized is not completed
there are so many possibilities that it
blows the line in the Flat Earth has no
real complete standard model because
it's all based on us finding out things
for ourselves we agree on the facts and
certain basics but the rest is only
hypothetical even if it's seemingly
makes
and as the evidence mounts for both the
flat earth and against the sphere I
wanted to create a special place where
folks can learn and share what they've
learned with other supporters
differences of opinion are certainly
going to come forth and should be
expressed openly remember that the goal
of my videos and their corresponding
threads is to provide the opportunity to
use each of us to learn and grow in any
area that any of us has a problem if
there is a thing you can't understand
then ask someone will have an opinion
and we can go from there if you have a
point to make
against what is considered an accepted
Flat Earth fact please provide any
relevant links or supporting proofs or
videos I am currently under the
impression that the entire space program
even low-earth orbit and all that is
there is really just a sleight-of-hand
trick by a group of illusionists that
have swindled the public the governments
of the world the media and us into
believing alive everybody a small group
of corporations and cabal's of almost
complete control of the entire financial
educational high-level governmental and
media systems leaving it up to real
armchair scientists and normal people
that can critically think and recreate
experiments themselves to independently
prove or disprove any accepted line of
thought about our reality look I ain't
the smartest man on the flat earth but I
ain't no dummy I'm educated I never ever
questioned or ever thought of an
alternative to a sphere earth until this
year it never entered my mind to
question this part of our reality at all
ever but now I question everything I'm a
Christian and I think I see the big
picture it is the most marginalized
ridiculed censored and hidden fact in
history
if this fact was made known to the world
at large just this one fact has the
power to completely transform the world
and everyone in it for the better
holistically in a myriad of ways our
rulers are well aware of this and that
is exactly why this truth has been held
from us so expertly for so long it is
about the truth of who we are where we
come from the actual position and
significance of humans earth the Sun
Moon and stars the fact is the earth is
flat and motionless
that is all and that is the revelation
that will finally break the matrix you
have been taught from the earliest ages
that you live on a spinning ball that
nASA has sent men to the moon that
satellites are hovering in perpetual
orbit overhead that an International
Space Station contains astronauts
free-floating above us that the earth is
a ball that tilts wobbles spins on its
axis and revolves around the Sun and
that all these and you are the result of
a big bang cosmic enok explosion 14
billion years ago which created
everything out of nothing yet nothing
could be farther from the truth the
truth is simple and easily proven you
can see for yourself the horizon is
always flat and you can measure using
sextants theater lights and lasers to
prove the earth and its massive oceans
have absolutely no curvature whatsoever
you can feel for yourself that the earth
beneath you is motionless and you can
measure as mickelson Morley Gale sagnik
airy and other scientists have to prove
that the earth is completely motionless
that's right it has been long proven by
several scientific experiments even in
the elitist peer-reviewed journals you
critics constantly harp on about that
the earth is a stationary plane the
reason you haven't heard about it before
is because the media is controlled by
the same people who created this
deception the only time you have ever
heard a flat earther mentioned in the
media it was ingest or ridicule the only
thing you have ever heard about Flat
Earth is that its adherents are ignorant
idiots sorry to burst your space bubble
but if you still think you're living on
a spinning ball in 2016 you my friend
are the ignorant one millions of people
worldwide are waking up to this
incredible rediscovery and this flat
earth movement has the potential to
bring about positive change on an
unprecedented level like a balloon held
underwater for 500 years the momentum of
truth rising to the surface is causing
and will continue to cause huge ripples
in the control system as the spinning
ball earth is finally being exposed
worldwide for the
hundred-year deception it was Earth's
entire population is suddenly being
faced with the reality that every
government every Space Agency University
secret society religious organization
mainstream and alternative media outlet
have all been duplicitous and propping
up a monstrous manipulation to fleece
and control the masses the resulting
mass mental exodus away from the control
system is exactly what humanity needs
once the Flat Earth truth gets out these
lying politicians spokesmen reporters
and teachers suddenly change from being
heralded voices of authority to being
ridiculed shunned and announced as they
deserve
once the Flat Earth truth gets out these
government's universities media outlets
and other entangled organizations which
have long been hard at work weaving this
multi-generational cosmological myth
suddenly and completely lose all
credibility once the truth of our Flat
Earth gets out so does the truth of
these few elite families and societies
who have kept this most important and
fundamental reality from us for these
hundreds of years essentially once the
Flat Earth truth gets out so does every
other important truth by proxy because
this mother of all conspiracies holds
under its umbrella literally all of the
other conspiracies and exposes them as a
result of deeply understanding this and
wanting to bring about a better world it
has become my life mission to spread the
Flat Earth truth to everyone I've
written two books on the subject the
Flat Earth conspiracy and 200 proofs the
earth is not a spinning ball I've
restarted the International Flat Earth
Research Society and maintained a
website with hundreds of articles on the
subject I've done Flat Earth radio
interviews made Flat Earth fa Q's Flat
Earth shirts written Flat Earth rap
songs audio video books documentaries
and created every other kind of media I
can think of to try and promote this
message now in just a few short years
thanks to the efforts of the rapidly
growing Flat Earth community this has
gone from a completely unknown
undiscussed topic to one of the highest
ranked google search terms on the
internet with tens of millions of hits
monthly if you still haven't done your
due diligence in researching to know for
yourself 100% that you are living on a
flat station
plain please look into the links
provided and for those of you who do now
I implore you to help my mission
operation spread flat earth truth simply
knowing the truth yourself will not and
cannot save the world
the only way to save the world is for
the whole world to know the truth as a
means to that end the most important
type of activism anyone can be doing
right now
is spreading these important truths on a
mass scale there are innumerable
creative ways to help achieve this the
following are several effective methods
myself or friends have had success with
one conversation one of the best ways to
engage people with the flat reality is
through conversation asking leading
questions dropping hints or just telling
people various proofs and evidences is a
great way to wake people up this only
works however if you are very
knowledgeable about the subject yourself
and able to answer every possible
question without hesitation like the
liars at NASA due to viewing parties
another good way to engage people is by
getting them to agree to sit down and
watch an informative documentary on the
subject such as my videos the world's
biggest secret were the masonic matrix
manipulators after watching you can then
do your best to field any questions
people may have 3 book gifting a great
indirect way of engaging people is by
buying and giving them copies of the
Flat Earth conspiracy 200 proofs earth
is not a spinning ball or other good
books on the subject if you own Flat
Earth books yourself be sure to let
friends and family borrow them as well
for school projects if you are currently
in school or university a great way to
expose this information is by writing
essays or doing projects which tackle
various aspects of ball earth
pseudoscience or exposed true Flat Earth
findings 5 social media I've had great
success using social media to spread
Flat Earth truth simply create accounts
with all the big social media sites like
Facebook Google+ Twitter LinkedIn
Instagram reddit StumbleUpon etc join
relevant groups and pages follow people
interested in related subjects and post
the best Flat Earth material you can
find to as many places as you can as
often as you can don't bother arguing
with the trolls and close minds that
will inevitably hound you but rather
focus on dissemination spreading the
message far and wide if people ask
genuine questions be sure to answer but
anyone merely looking to ridicule should
be left alone to talk with themselves
six YouTube and other video sharing
sites with 13 million hits and growing
my youtube channel has done an excellent
job spreading this message we need more
people to start Flat Earth YouTube and
other video sharing site channels either
creating original content or just
reuploading other good content I
personally have given everyone
permission to use any and all of my
content to help spread the word once you
upload a new video to YouTube then go to
all your social media accounts and post
each new video to all the relevant pages
groups and timelines you can seven
translations for multilingual
flat-earthers one of the best things you
can do is help translate good Flat Earth
material into your native tongue my book
200 proofs earth is not a spinning ball
has now been translated into twelve
different languages and Counting
reaching people who would otherwise
never have a chance of understanding
this material the majority of which
currently exists only in English a
graffiti or artwork another great method
of spreading the word is through artwork
or graffiti writing important search
terms or keywords and phrases on paper
money is also very effective on the
borders of your dollar bills simply
write Atlantean conspiracy calm I first
dot one two three st the earth is flat
Google Flat Earth Google Eric Dubay or
other such messages nine pamphleteering
or stickers creating small brochures or
stickers with Flat Earth information on
them and handing them out in public
spaces is an excellent way to spread the
work compile several photo proofs or
text proofs and put them in an easily
printable and readable format than hand
out as many as you can
ten radio or TV show Collins many
different TV and radio shows give their
viewers or listeners the opportunity to
call in and talk with the host about
certain subjects a great way to spread
the word is either by calling into these
shows and engaging them on the subject
on the spot
or contacting their producers beforehand
and seeing if you could actually be
interviewed there are an infinite number
of creative ways we can spread this most
important message but the key is numbers
and consistency we need to hit a
critical mass tipping point of awakened
individuals dedicated to helping unplug
everyone else from the spinning ball
earth matrix if you have figured out the
truth of our Flat Earth and realize the
amazing positive implications of this
being exposed worldwide please join me
on my mission to help spread the Flat
Earth truth to the entire flat world
so flutters for newbies flutters 101
when some people come to the flutters
for the first time they can't quite
grasp what our model looks like or how
it works this video is a very quick
basic understanding of the model with an
emphasis on basic the study of the
flatterers by the masses such as what is
going on now is being performed by
amateurs such as myself and many others
with absolutely no funding and and it
has really only been happening since
Maeby's at the beginning of 2015 while
we find it rather easy to disprove the
spherical earth and the heliocentric
model we admittedly do not have all of
our ducks in a row for the Flat Earth
model and what I am presenting is in no
way is supposed to represent a complete
working model or a mechanism behind the
model now with that understood let's
just take a look at what's going on here
so what does the Flat Earth look like
well the oceans deepest point isn't
really that far and the Russian is a
super deep digging project only dug down
about eight miles or so so I can't
really tell you what's under the crust
of the earth except that the Bible says
it's not such a nice place and believe
it or not we've only really gone up into
the sky as high as maybe twenty or
thirty miles so I really can't tell you
what's up there either
beyond what we can see with amateur
Rockets and weather balloon footage in
the Flat Earth model the Sun and the
moon are the same size and they're both
a lot closer and a lot smaller than the
heliocentric model claims whatever we
think is holding space away from the
atmosphere of Earth is called for lack
of better words the firmament in divide
and it seems that it's bullshit like a
dome the stars seem to be in that dome
and the whole things used to rotate
above us right over the center of the
disk shaped earth which is the North
Pole
spinning seemingly around Polaris every
once every 23 hours 56 minutes so we
might have trouble describing the
underbelly or the heavens above well we
can get a picture a basic idea of what
the the plane of the Flat Earth looks
like from old maps from sailing records
and from first-hand reports now as it
turns out it looks a lot like the UN
logo which is taken from a map
projection called the azimuthal
equidistant or AE for short for the Flat
Earth model to work the earth does not
have to look exactly like this but it's
close enough so you get the idea this is
just a representation that most flat
earthers used for now until better data
comes in as it stands flat earthers do
not believe that antarctica is an actual
continent at the bottom of the ball we
know that the ball is a hoax meant to
deceive people and keep the creator away
from their thoughts
Antarctica is probably nothing more than
a small part of the ice ring that juts
out a little bit or even maybe a
comparatively small island but it's not
an actual massive continent Island at
the bottom of the ball now there are
bases there and and people there at a
place that they call in Arctica and the
public can even take tours there if they
want and spend five thousand or ten
thousand dollars but it's a heavily
guarded protected area and there is a
real treaty with the military presence
stopping people from going there on
their own and they've even been caught
faking 24 hours son footage
but but enough go to Antarctica that's a
whole video on its own to which there
are plenty online to choose from now
looking down from above the earth would
look like a circle with the North
Magnetic Pole smack in the middle
picture a dartboard or a CD or a disc as
you can see the land masses are spread
out all over the flat disc and now
imagine the land having a raised edge at
the end kind of like a pizza has but
we'll pretend the crust is made of ice
instead and it's several hundred feet
high everywhere which keeps the water in
so it doesn't fall off the edge and just
to be clear we are not even sure that
there is an edge to fall off of so to
speak the ice could go on forever or not
we just don't know that edge is
Antarctica and is not an island but it's
rather a ring of ice that surrounds the
entire disc and we're really not sure
how deep it goes or what is out there
the Sun and Moon travel around the face
of the earth as described like like the
hands of a clock move around its face
and as a matter of fact picture a circle
around you has a 24-hour clock if you
point yourself due south with a compass
and and act as if that's 12:00 noon on
the clock then the sun's position in the
sky will actually act like a giant clock
hand and tell you what time it is now
this is based on 24-hour time like I
said but the Sun acts like the hour hand
because the earth is really a circle
like clock face and the Sun takes 24
hours to go and circle around it's 24
time zones
now let's see a glow outside point due
south and try it remember not to factor
in daylight savings time the moon
likewise circles above us but a little
slower than a Sun giving us the phases
and showing us the months together they
are a real calendar the light is cast on
the earth and how much of it you can see
will depend on your position relative to
it perspective accounts for sunsets and
sunrises which other videos will attest
you in greater detail the Sun is simply
moving too far away from the observer to
see it any longer as it gets smaller and
disappears on the horizon the light is
cast from the Sun onto the earth at
different diameters depending on the
time of year and because the Sun spirals
in and out throughout the course of the
year
this causes seasons let's start out
roughly on September 21st the equinoxes
where we supposedly have equal days and
nights all over the earth the Sun
travels over the equator on that day
now as the year progresses the Sun will
spiral outwards making even larger
circles and maintaining the same 24 hour
rotation as it spirals outwards the days
get shorter that's the day light and
colder for each location north of its
position well to the south that gets
longer to daylight and warmer this maxes
out on December 21st while the Sun is
over the Tropic of Capricorn the Sun
hangs out there for a few days and then
the Sun starts its journey back the way
it came making tighter and tighter
circles thus the South now gets colder
and receives less daylight while the
North gets hotter and whoa seems more
daylight
the Sun will continue this Titor
spiraling pattern for six months until
it arrives over the Tropic of Cancer
which brings the hottest and longest
days for locations to its north and the
opposite for those to itself it likewise
hangs out for a few days and then starts
the pattern all over again in the Flat
Earth model the Sun and the moon are the
same size and they're both a lot closer
and a lot smaller than the heliocentric
model claims North is always towards the
center of the map no matter where you
are on it so if you appointed a compass
due north opposite of you would be due
south because of this east of Western
never straight lines they are always
curving slightly and our distance from
the central pole would determine the
amount that that curve would be noticed
on a flat map Antarctica is not a
continent on the bottom of the ball it's
a nice ring that surrounds the Flat
Earth so Antarctica is the South Pole or
opposite to the north and actually if we
picture a speaker magnet that's kind of
how it works a magnetic Center with an
opposite outer ring
Magellan in Columbus did not prove a
sphere on the flat map their travels are
merely east to west which are quite
doable they could continue one direction
and get back to exactly where they
started just as this image details now
boats disappearing bottom first from the
horizon are not really going over any
curve of the earth its perspective and
we have plenty of zoomed footage on
video to prove it
gravity is density weight and buoyancy
it doesn't have to depend on a spinning
earth as pseudoscience would have you
believe now science is wonderful but
astral theology is not real science they
should stick to writing fiction instead
of teaching their religion as a fact in
fact it is the majority of flat earthers
opinions that most people out there
really that still believe in the
heliocentric why they don't know what
they believe and if they did they
probably wouldn't believe it anymore see
the people that organize and run NASA
along with some of the leading so-called
scientists in the world with the help of
the media and the educational systems
that are controlled by the bad guys have
reinforced the heliocentric lie that was
started a very long long time ago of
course the church had a major role in
this now it's had centuries and
centuries to cultivate and prove itself
and the Flat Earth movement finally
gained enough traction that in one year
it almost dismantled the whole thing I
imagine that 2016 will be be even larger
more viral and the people of the world
will no longer be able to avoid it but
or be shielded from it
so I asked you are you ready for what's
going to come next
you
okay here's a little illustrator or a
little cartoon from a website called
time and date comm it's really funny
that they would have a perfect
illustration of a Sun rising and setting
on a flat earth due to perspective
you'll notice that it rises from below
the horizon and sets below the horizon
now you might be saying well how is that
possible I can see now you're saying
that it rises and lowers due to
perspective but how does it disappear
below the horizon well I got a theory
about that because of the fact that all
parallel lines and planes converge at
your eye level horizon this is according
to the perspective I'm not making this
up
if in fact and they do they converge at
your eye level horizon visually then it
makes sense that after that point they
diverge meaning they then separate so
the Sun would continue on a downward
track as you can see from my
illustration here the lines would go to
your horizon and then afterwards they
would spread out and separate kind of
like a starburst and the starburst being
at your horizon
at your focal plane
where is the curvature where no
curvature
do you even know what you're supposed to
believe when it comes to the
heliocentric model is this what you
believe because this is what they say is
going on the earth tilted at sixty six
point six degrees from ninety the
Earth's spinning at 1,000 miles an hour
the earth orbiting at sixty six thousand
six hundred miles an hour the Sun moving
even faster through the galaxy as it
races towards the so-called
galactic center and the galaxy itself
moving even faster than that in its ever
expanding expansion and we don't feel it
we can't even get a negative test to
prove any of this motion at all and the
famous areas experiment showed and
michelson-morley and sag net gale just
to name a few that was over a hundred
years ago
yeah they soundly defeated the theories
of gravity and relativity and special
relativity but unfortunately the
scientific community have been fooled by
the leaders of academia as they buried
the results and their students and
teachers alike they never even knew
these experiments took place when
scrutinized all this movement just
doesn't make sense
remember that we always see the
constellations in the same place in the
same order in the same height in the sky
every single night
there is absolutely no stellar parallax
whatsoever showing that we we just don't
move
so do you feel it can you feel any of
that incredible speed in motion you know
gas flows up butterflies float around
when we when we view things from a
synthetic observation point we find out
that we're not moving the real
scientific tests also show that we're
not moving the Bible tells us that we're
not moving common sense tells us that
we're not moving astrophysicists and
space agencies have tried to con the
world into believing they're very
satanic heliocentric lie
and they have done rather well up until
now but the cats out of the bag and this
light cannot continue forever
Rockets can't work in a vacuum such as
so called space there's nothing to
thrust against there's no atmosphere for
the fuel to push on for an opposite
reaction to occur so once we reach space
under a rocket power
we couldn't steer or accelerate or slow
down or stop certain space agencies and
astrophysicists and myth-busting hosts
claimed otherwise but you know if
they've even published equations that
prove otherwise but some other equations
probably declare that the Rockets in
space work actually going through the
math and performing the physical tests
proves otherwise and that's why we never
see a rocket or even the highly
televised shuttle missions actually
enter this so-called vacuum called space
and while their equations preface
certainly declares that they do going
through the math and performing the
physical tests proves that Rockets can't
work in space in stage one of these two
similar experiments a balloon is blown
up and it's placed in in the place of
rocket fuel and it's attached to this
straw and it's taped to a toy car now
the balloon is released in the air
travels through the straw and the car is
propelled forward as expected
in stage two the two scientists will try
to disperse the air that's coming out of
the straw to act as the vacuum would in
space let's watch these two stage
experiments unfold and see what happens
when the atmosphere is removed from the
equation the person on the right tries
it with a vacuum cleaner and misses on
his first attempt to get it in exactly
the right spot
the person on the Left
makes a paper deflector to show that the
opposite reaction is based off the fuel
pushing off the atmosphere outside that
vehicle the person on the right tries a
few more times with the vacuum cleaner
and on his fourth attempt he gets her in
just the right spot and the car doesn't
move he misses again on five but but on
number six he places the hose just
perfectly and once again the rocket car
doesn't mean even an inch
the contention is that this shows that
the rocket is dependent on the
atmosphere to push off of for its
opposite reaction the rocket needs an
atmosphere to move when we take away
that atmosphere the rocket doesn't move
on the Left deflecting the motion of the
air rushing out of the straw shows that
the opposite reaction needed for thrust
is escaping fuel hitting the atmosphere
the person on the Left releases the
balloon and the air rushes out and is
deflected to the right and left and the
vehicle doesn't move forward
rockets can't work in space
before satellites were thought of there
were already technologies allowing us to
send long-distance messages without
wires ground-based systems for
telephones and radio were being used by
people on both sides of the fund we were
able to transmit through the atmosphere
and skip signals off with a firmament
whatever that is to the other side of
the earth using ham radios
there are many ham radio operators today
and lots of clubs all over the world
Marconi sent a message across the
Atlantic over 100 years ago and all
technologies were well established and
working fine using only ground-based
operations today we still use
ground-based systems to connect to each
other via cable television phone lines
the internet with fiber optic
transatlantic cables and RF towers
there's tens of thousands of huge RF
towers used to broadcast all kinds of
signals all over the world and they're
still being built in today's satellite
age your cell phone signal has a limited
range depending on who your provider is
and how many towers their system is
linked to even if satellites were real
they are simply not needed to do what
they say they're doing we can do it
better and cheaper from the ground
people that work in the satellite field
are really working on tangible things
things that really work and do what they
say they're doing but it is not what
those texts and the rest of us are being
led to believe since space and
everything up there is simply not as
they're telling us it is if their art
device is up high in the sky helping
with communications then then NASA
probably reconfigures them to work
wherever they want them to work
and maybe doing it with hot-air balloons
or some kind of secret advanced
technology but they're definitely not
putting anything up in so-called space
all right so what have we learned so far
well we've learned that we really can't
trust NASA and that they never went to
the moon
they faked everything including
weightlessness from zero-g high-altitude
planes they faked pictures of Earth from
space and that we never even went to
space because Rockets can't work in a
vacuum of course that starts to mess
with people's minds because we can
actually use electronic devices every
day which supposedly depend on satellite
technology up in space now I've said
this before and I'm sure it'll say it
again the technology exists but none of
it is based up in space there are no
satellites orbiting the supposedly
spherical earth and people working in
the satellite technology sure there are
but no one is denying that but whatever
is being done with that piece of
hardware is not being strapped onto a
rocket and shot in outer space so I
guess now it's time to take a look at
satellites and see what's really going
on and how we can make sense of
satellite TVs and satellite phones and
GPS and things like that so there we go
geosynchronous or geostationary
satellites were actually a fictional
creation of the famous science fiction
writer Arthur C Clark who was also a
high ranking freemason and about a
decade later they became a so-called
reality that we all ended up paying for
with our taxes and our higher bills for
such things as cable and internet things
like that so basically a freemason
created a piece of fiction and then all
those compare arts convinced us all that
it was tangible and a reality now I'm
not saying that there aren't people
working on tech that is supposed to be
satellite related I'm saying that
satellite tech does not go into space
where they say satellites are actually
located is in itself a work of fiction
like the concepts of warp speed and dark
matter multiple universes or string
theory just to name a few
the Google loon project plans to string
hundreds of weather balloons all the way
around the earth at around the 40
degrees south latitude mark which has
very little land in this mostly open
ocean they will be all the way around
the earth so that people living in the
South can all get the Internet basically
just as easily as those of us in the
North because most of the area down
there is over ocean water and there is
no service over the ocean even though
they say we have tens of thousands of
satellites in orbit 40,000 now I think
now this doesn't make sense
if the heliocentric model is true and it
doesn't make sense if we have all those
satellites in space plus it'll be easier
and cheaper just to send a few
satellites up compared to hundreds of
weather balloons that need to be
constantly adjusted and maintained
so if satellites were real why not
simply use them of course
when we look at the coverage area on the
Flat Earth map things start to make a
little more sense
many believe that our satellite
communication and GPS telephone internet
etc is not coming from space over the
land they use cell towers to bounce
signals to and fro but over the oceans
they can't however over water balloons
blimps boats and planes can bounce
signals to and fro which is exactly what
Google loon plans to do because space is
fake and satellites are not up there
satellites exist and function in some
fashion but they are not up in space
orbiting the Earth and Google hoon is a
good example as to why plus they could
use those balloons for other reasons
GPS black boxes telephone service TVs
and just about anything else that
transmits digitally our example and
we've been doing that sort of thing with
dishes and towers long before satellites
were theorized in mainland USA TV
satellite dishes are almost always
pointed at or near a 45-degree angle
it's towards the nearest ground-based
repeater tower if they were getting
their signal from a geostationary
satellite in space then they should all
be pointing at between 80 and 100 degree
angles which is basically straight up
into space since geostationary
satellites by very definition match
Earth's suppose it's spin and stay in
one location
the constant 45-degree angle that almost
all dishes in the mainland US are
pointed to proves that they are picking
up ground-based signals from repeater
towers and not from geostationary
satellites and space think about it and
then go have a look at a few dishes in
your own area what angle is your dish
pointed to
supposedly geosynchronous or
geostationary communication satellites
match the Earth's rotation so that they
seem like they are staying over one
location at all time if that's the case
then satellite communications should
always work and never go out
but satellite TV and satellite internet
and satellite phones do not work well in
countries like Kazakhstan for example or
in virtually any southern continental
island where there are coincidentally
only a few or no cell phone towers
satellite tech does not work well and in
places where there are few cell towers
compared to the US but if they were
where they say they are will happen
space then we should always get a signal
now regardless of the number of cell
phone towers that our particular
location has even the best satellite
tech on earth can't work without cell
towers
the atmospheric temperature is around
4,500 degrees where most satellites live
the components that make up a satellite
cannot withstand that kind of heat and
they would literally turn into molten
globs of metal pretty quickly nASA has a
little fast talk to try to get them out
of this pickle but they very clearly
contradict their own words and set of
laws by claiming that even though it is
indeed really hot up there these crafts
don't feel it because there
the atmosphere is actually quite thin
how were they able to measure it to
begin with let alone be able to compare
it to the surrounding area
they couldn't even last a minute in that
kind of heat nASA says that there are
more than 20,000 satellites orbiting the
Earth actually it's 40,000 bringing us
such goodies as satellite TV GPS cell
phone signals and weather information
and of course pictures of the Earth from
space they admit however that all of
their images from space are really just
composites and strips of data that have
been strung together to form images
after being photoshopped to make them
look appealing now there are no real
images from space not even of the famous
blue Marvel series from the Apollo
missions we've all seen the pics of
Earth from space and satellites and
schools encyclopedias and in history
books and they're all demonstrably fake
green screens layers and CGI and
paintings animations models and cartoons
but no real pictures people claim to see
satellites with the naked eye even
though they are only the size of a small
bus or smaller and supposedly orbit
hundreds or thousands of miles up in
reality we all struggle to see a
commercial plane relatively close to us
at you know five to seven miles high due
to the laws of perspective we simply
cannot see something that small from
that far away even if it had the most
powerful set of lights ever invented
strapped under to its underbelly now
let's have a look at some low-earth
orbiting objects such as the
International Space Station or ISS for
short nASA says that the ISS orbits at
only 250 miles high but that is only
1/32 of the Earth's diameter higher than
the earth itself and imagine an ant on a
basketball it'll raise that ant to half
an inch off the ground and now look at
that ball at the end from the opposite
side of that ant and see if you can see
the ant but you can't then the Sun can't
shine it's light onto the ISS during the
night time the earth itself would block
out that portion of the sun's light from
reaching the ISS so how can we see a
reflection of sunlight off of the ISS at
night well we can't and the fact is that
at least for now the truth community
doesn't really know what's flying around
up there or how large it is or how high
up it is and the fact that we can see
some light from something at all means
that it just cannot be the ISS orbiting
at only 250 miles high
in my opinion in lieu of what has just
been stated it's kind of ridiculous to
think otherwise whether it's a satellite
flying so far away that we can't
possibly see it from Earth or if it's
the ISS flying too close to Earth so we
can't see it at night whatever it is we
are seeing that's not what we've been
told if it is a man-made object we know
that it's high up but it's not in space
but for all we know it's a natural body
moving around like the wandering stars
that they have tracked and named the ISS
before satellites were thought of there
were already technologies allowing us to
send long-distance messages without
wires ground-based systems for
telephones and radio were being used by
people on both sides of the plant we
were able to transmit through the
atmosphere and skip signals off of the
firmament whatever that is to the other
side of the earth using ham radios there
are many ham radio operators today and
lots of clubs all over the world Marconi
sent a message across the Atlantic over
100 years ago and all technologies were
well established and working fine using
only ground-based operations today we
still use ground-based systems to
connect to each other via cable
television phone lines the internet with
fiber optic transatlantic cables and RF
towers there's tens of thousands of huge
RF towers used to broadcast all kinds of
signals all over the world and they're
still being built in today's satellite
age
your cell phone signal has a limited
range depending on who your provider is
and how many towers their system is
linked to even if satellites were real
they are simply not needed to do what
they say they're doing we can do it
better and cheaper from the ground
people that work in the satellite field
are really working on intangible things
things that really work and do what they
say they're doing but it is not what
those texts and the rest of us are being
led to believe since space and
everything up there is simply not as
they're telling us it is if there are
devices up high in the sky helping with
communications than then NASA probably
reconfigures them to work wherever they
want them to work and maybe doing it
with hot-air balloons or some kind of
secret advanced technology but they're
definitely not putting anything up in
so-called space before satellites were
even thought of we already had worldwide
navigation systems in place Lauren and
Decca used radio signal pulses between
RF towers to pinpoint vessels location
many people contend that today's GPS is
merely an extension of those old
ground-based systems and that GPS does
not be any information down to earth
from space there is no such thing as
real satellites space fictional sure a
real nope and the fact is that we don't
need satellites to provide the
information that they supposedly do
we've been doing it from the ground for
decades and they still build RF towers
today like crazy operating 24 hours a
day numerous nations maintain a network
of Loran transmitting stations to
service the major shipping lanes there
are a pair here for example Sakonnet and
Bodie Island one is known as the master
station the other is the slave for a
moment consider these two stations
operating as a synchronous pair
simultaneously emitting short pulses of
radio energy leaving both short stations
simultaneously a pair of pulses travel
out into space in all directions at a
constant speed
roughly 186,000 miles per second or the
speed of light plus the pulse from the
closer station will reach the ship an
instant before the pulse from the other
station the Loran shipboard gear
measures this difference in time of
arrival in millionths of a second or
microseconds it simply determines how
much longer one pulse takes to reach the
ship than the other pulse
now this same time interval will be
observed at many points within the range
of the two Shore stations and when
connected these points form a hyperbola
known as the Loran line of position to
aid the navigator in obtaining a fix
specially prepared Loran tables and
charts contain accurately plotted lines
of position on the various time
differences encountered in a particular
area having one line of position we then
obtain readings from another pair of
stations an accurate fix is established
at the intersection of the two lines of
position
you
isn't flat this is called remedy that's
not treat what is you have no idea okay
next question
whoa here's the difference we can
describe gravity we can say what it does
to other things we can we can measure it
predict with it but when you start
asking like what it is it's not treat
what is when you start asking like what
it is it's called gravity
the formation and collection of matter
in the universe follows the laws of
physics and when you add in the dark
matter dark matter this this extra
gravity
it turns the universe into the universe
that we see that's why we know the dark
matter is real that's not true we don't
know what it is but we know it's there
because we can't make the universe as we
see it unless we put this extra gravity
into our simulation so you know it's
something does never interact with our
light where there are telescopes but
that it has gravity so these particles
are invisible to us but otherwise
attracting our matter into their
nucleating us among
if you fill a balloon with helium a
substance lighter than the nitrogen
oxygen and other elements which compose
the air around it the balloon will
immediately fly upwards if you fill a
balloon with hydrogen a substance even
lighter than helium the balloon will fly
upwards even faster if you blow a
dandelion seed out of your hands
a substance just barely heavier than the
air it will float away and slowly but
eventually fall to the ground and if you
drop an anvil from your hands something
much heavier than the air it will
quickly and directly fall straight to
the ground now this has absolutely
nothing to do with gravity the fact that
light things rise up and heavy things
fall down simply a natural property of
weight and density that is very
different from gravity gravity is a
hypothetical magnetic like force
possessed by large masses which Isaac
Newton needed to help explain the
heliocentric theory of the universe lady
Blount says most people in England have
either read or heard that Sir Isaac
Newton's theory of gravitation was
originated by his seeing an Apple fall
to the earth from a tree in his garden
persons gifted with ordinary common
sense would say that the Apple fell down
to earth because for bulk it was heavier
than the surrounding air but if instead
of the Apple a fluffy feather had been
detached from the tree a breeze would
probably have sent the feather floating
away and the feather would not reach the
earth until the surrounding air became
so still that by virtue of its own
density the feather it would fall to the
ground
Wilbur of all of a famous flat earther
in the early 20th century gave lectures
all over America against Newtonian
astronomy he would begin by walking on
stage with a book a balloon a feather
and a brick and asked the audience how
is it that a law of gravitation can pull
up a toy balloon and cannot put up a
brick I throw up this book why doesn't
it go on up that book went up as far as
the force behind it forced it and it
fell because it was heavier than the air
and that is the only reason I cut the
string of a toy balloon it rises gets to
a certain height and then it begins to
settle
I take this brick in a feather I blow
the feather yonder it goes finally it
begins to settle and comes down this
brick goes up as far as the force forces
it and then it comes down because it is
heavier than the air that is all david
Wardlaw scott says any object which is
heavier than the air and which is
unsupported has a natural tendency to
fall by its own weight newton's famous
apple at Woolsthorpe
or any other apple when ripe loses hold
of its stock and being heavier than the
air drops as a matter of necessity to
the ground
totally irrespective of any attraction
of the earth for if such attraction
existed why does not the earth attract
the rising smoke which is not nearly so
heavy as the apple the answer is simple
because the smoke is lighter than the
air and therefore does not fall but a
sense gravitation is only a subterfuge
employed by Newton in his attempt to
prove that the Earth revolves around the
Sun and the quicker it is relegated to
the tomb of all the capulets the better
will it be for all classes of society
Thomas Winship says the law of
gravitation is said by the advocates of
the Newtonian system of astronomy to be
the greatest discovery of science and
the foundation of the whole of modern
astronomy if therefore it can be shown
that gravitation as a pure assumption
and an imagination of the mind only that
it has no existence outside of the
brains of its expound errs and advocates
the whole of the hypothesis of this
modern so-called science fall to the
ground as flat as the surface of the
ocean in this most exact of all Sciences
this wonderful feat of the intellect
becomes at once the most ridiculous
superstition and the most gigantic
imposture to which ignorant and
credulity could ever be exposed
Einstein's theory of relativity in the
entire heliocentric model of the
universe hinge upon Newton's law of
gravitation heliocentric lame that the
Sun is the most massive object in the
heavens more massive even than the earth
and therefore the earth and other
it's by law are caught up in the Sun's
gravity and forced to orbit perpetual
circles and ellipses around it they
claim that gravity also somehow allows
people buildings the oceans and all of
nature to exist on the underside of
their ball earth without falling off now
even if gravity did exist why would it
cause both planets to orbit the Sun and
people to stick to the earth gravity
should either cause people to float in
suspended circular orbits around the
earth or it should cause the earth to be
pulled and crashed into the Sun what
sort of magic is gravity that it can
glue people's feet to the ball earth
while causing earth itself to revolve
ellipses around the Sun the two effects
are very different yet the same cause is
attributed to both furthermore this
magnetic like attraction of massive
objects gravity is purported to have can
be found nowhere in the natural world
there is no example in nature of a
massive sphere or any other shaped
object which by virtue of its mass alone
causes smaller objects to stick to or
orbit around it there is nothing on
earth massive enough that it can be
shown to cause even a dust bunny to
stick to or orbit around it try spinning
a wet tennis ball or any other spherical
object with smaller things placed on its
surface and you will find that
everything falls or flies off and
nothing sticks to or orbits around it to
claim the existence of a physical law
without a single practical evidential
example is hearsay not science lady
Blount and Albert Smith wrote that
bodies in some instances are seen to
approach each other as a fact but that
their mutual approach is due to an
attraction or pulling process on the
part of these bodies is after all a mere
theory
I thought the seas may sometimes be
admissible but when they are invented to
support other hypotheses they are not
only to be doubted but discredited and
discarded the hypothesis of a universal
force called gravitation is based upon
and was indeed invented with a view to
support another hypothesis namely that
the earth and sea together make
the vast globe whirling away through
space and therefore needing some force
or forces to guide it in its mad career
and so control it as to make it conform
to what is called its annual orbit
around the Sun the theory first of all
makes the earth to be a globe then not a
perfect globe but an oblate spheroid
flattened at the poles then more oblate
until it was in danger of becoming so
flattened that it would be like a cheese
and passing over minor variations of
form we are finally told that the earth
is pear-shaped and that the ellipsoid
has been replaced by an alloy what shape
it may assume next we cannot tell it
will depend upon the whim or fancy of
some astute and speculating scientist
how is it that gravity is so strong that
it can hold all the oceans buildings and
people stuck to the underside of the
ball earth but so weak that it allows
birds bugs smoke and balloons to
casually made its grips completely how
is it that gravity holds our bodies
clung to the underside of a ball earth
but yet we can easily raise our legs and
arms walk or jump and feel no such
constant downward pulling force how is
it that gravity can cause planets to
revolve elliptical orbits around a
single center of Attraction ellipses by
nature require two foci and the force of
gravitation would have to regularly
increase and decrease to keep planets in
constant orbit and prevent pulling them
into direct collision courses thomas
Winship says that the sun's path is an
exact circle for only about four periods
in a year and then of only a few hours
at the equinoxes and solstices
completely disproves the might have been
of circular gravitation and by
consequence all of gravitation if the
Sun were of sufficient power to retain
the earth and its orbit when nearest the
Sun when the earth arrived at that part
of its elliptical path farthest from the
Sun the attractive force unless very
greatly increased would be utterly
incapable of preventing the earth
rushing away into space in a right line
forever as astronomers say
on the other hand it is equally clear
that if the sun's attraction were just
sufficient to keep the earth in its
proper path when farthest from the Sun
and thus to prevent it rushing off into
space the same power of attraction when
the earth was nearest the Sun would be
so much greater that unless the
attraction were very greatly diminished
nothing would prevent the earth rushing
towards and being absorbed by the Sun
there being no counterbalancing focus to
prevent such a catastrophe as astronomy
makes no reference to the increase and
diminution of the attractive force of
the Sun called gravitation for the above
necessary purposes we are again forced
to the conclusion that the great
discovery of which astronomers are so
proud is absolutely non-existent and and
Crossland says we are asked by the
Newtonian to believe that the action of
gravitation which we can easily overcome
by the slightest exercise of volition
and raising a hand or foot is so
overwhelmingly violent when we lose our
balance and fall a distance of a few
feet that this force which is
imperceptible under usual conditions may
under extraordinary circumstances cause
the fracture of every limb we possess
common sense must reject this
interpretation gravitation does not
furnish a satisfactory explanation of
the phenomena here described whereas the
definition of weight already given does
for our body seeking in the radiused
manner its level of stability would
produce precisely the result experienced
if the influence which kept us securely
attached to this earth were identical
with that which is powerful enough to
disturb a distant planet in its orbit we
should be more immediately conscious of
its masterful presence and potency
whereas this influence is so impotent in
the very spot where it is supposed to be
most dominant that we find an
insurmountable difficulty in accepting
the idea of its existence heliocentric
lame the ball earth is perpetually
spinning on its axis at a mind-numbing
1038 miles per hour or 19 miles per
second and somehow people animals
buildings oceans and other surface
phenomena can stick to the underside of
the spinning ball without falling or
flying
take a ride on the Gravitron at your
local amusement park however and notice
how the faster it spins the more you are
pushed away from the center of spin not
towards it
even if the centripetal inward pulling
force of gravity did exist which it does
not the centrifugal a word pushing force
of the ball Earth's suppose at nineteen
mile per second spin would also exist
and have to be overcome yet neither of
these opposing forces have ever been
shown to have any existence outside the
imaginations of heliocentric scientists
David Ward law scott says we are not
like flies which by the peculiar
formation of their feet can crawl on a
ball but we are human being who require
a plain surface on which to walk and how
could we be fastened to the earth
whirling according to your theory around
the Sun at the rate of 19 miles per
second the famed law of gravitation will
not avail though we are told that we
have 15 pounds of atmosphere pressing on
every square inch of our bodies but this
does not appear to be particularly
logical for there are many athletes who
can leap nearly their own height and run
a mile in less than five minutes which
they could not possibly do if they were
thus handicapped in Crossland says the
attraction of gravitation is said to be
stronger at the surface of the earth
than at a distance from it is it so if I
spring upwards perpendicularly I cannot
with all my might ascend more than four
feet from the ground but if I jump in a
curve with a low trajectory keeping my
highest elevation about three feet
I might clear a bound of space above the
earth of about 18 feet so that
practically I can overcome the so-called
force pull the distance of four feet in
the proportion of 18 to 4 being the very
reverse of what I ought to be able to do
according to the Newtonian hypothesis
Newton also theorized and it is now
commonly taught that the Earth's ocean
tides are caused by gravitational lunar
Attraction if the moon is only 2160
miles in diameter in the earth eight
thousand miles
however using their own math and law it
follows that the earth is 87 times more
massive and therefore the larger body
should attract the smaller to it and not
the other way around
if the Earth's greater gravity is what
keeps the moon in orbit it is impossible
for the moon's lesser gravity to
supersede the Earth's gravity at Earth's
sea level where its gravitational
attraction would even further out trump
the moon's not to mention the velocity
and path of the moon are uniform and
should therefore exert a uniform
influence on the Earth's tides when in
actuality the Earth's tides vary greatly
furthermore if ocean tides are caused by
moon's gravitation how is it that lakes
ponds and other smaller bodies of
standing water remain outside the moon's
grasp while the gigantic oceans are so
affected Thomas Winship says if the moon
lifted up the water it is evident that
near the land the water would be drawn
away and low instead of high tide caused
again the velocity and path of the moon
are uniform and it follows that if she
exerted any influence on the earth that
influence could only be a uniform
influence but the tides are not uniform
at port natal all the rise and fall is
about six feet while at birra about 600
miles up the coast the rise and fall is
26 feet this effectually settles the
matter that the moon has no influence on
the tides tides are caused by the gentle
and gradual rise and fall of the earth
on the bosom of the mighty deep in
inland lakes there are no tides which
also proves that the moon cannot attract
either the earth or water to cause tides
but the fact that the basin of the lake
is on the earth which rests on the
waters of the deep shows that no tides
are possible as the waters of the lakes
together with the earth rise and fall
and thus the tides at the coast are
caused
while there are no tides on waters
unconnected the see Samuel Rowbotham
says it is affirmed that the intensity
of attraction increases with proximity
and vice-versa
how then when the waters are drawn up by
the moon from their bed and away from
the Earth's attraction which at that
greater distance from the center is
considerably diminished while that of
the moon is proportionally increased how
is it possible that all the waters acted
on should be prevented leaving the earth
and flying away to the moon if the moon
has power of Attraction sufficient to
lift the waters of Earth at all even a
single inch from their deepest
receptacles where the Earth's attraction
is much greater there is nothing in the
theory of attraction of gravitation to
prevent her taking to herself all the
waters which came within her influence
let the smaller body once overcome the
power of the larger and the power of the
smaller becomes greater than when it
first operated because the matter acted
on is nearer to it proximity is greater
and therefore power is greater how then
can the waters of the ocean immediately
underneath the moon flow towards the
shores and so cause a flood tide water
flows it is said through the law of
gravity or attraction of the Earth's
center is it possible then for the moon
having once overcome the power of the
earth to let go her hold upon the waters
through the influence of a power which
she has conquered and which therefore is
less than her own the above and other
difficulties which exist in connection
with the explanation of the tides
afforded by the Newtonian system have
led many including Sir Isaac Newton
himself to admit that such explanation
is the least satisfactory portion of the
theory of gravitation thus we have been
carried forward by the sheer force of
evidence to the conclusion that the
tides of the sea do not arise from the
attraction of the moon but simply from
the rising and falling of the floating
earth in the waters of the great deep
that calmness which is found to exist at
the bottom of the great seas could not
possibly be if the waters were
alternately raised by the moon and
pulled down by the earth
they've been Ward lost God says even Sir
Isaac Newton himself confessed the
explanation of moons
action on the tides was the least
satisfactory part of his theory this
theory asserts that larger objects
attract the smaller and the mass of the
Moon being reckoned as only 1/8 of that
of the earth it follows that if by the
presumed force of gravitation the Earth
revolves around the Sun much more for
the same reason should the moon do so
likewise instead of which that willful
or still continues to go around our
world tides vary greatly in height owing
chiefly to the different configurations
of the adjoining lands at CHEP's Tao it
rises to 60 feet at Portishead to 50
while at Dublin Bay it is but 12 and
that Wexford only 5 feet but the earth
itself has a slight tremulous motion may
be seen in the movement of the spirit
level even when fixed as steadily as
possible and not the sea has a
fluctuation may be witnessed by the
oscillation of an anchored shit in the
comest day of summer by what means the
tides are so regularly affected is that
present only conjectured possibly it may
be by atmospheric pressure on the waters
of the great deep and perhaps even the
moon itself as suggested by the late dr.
Rowbotham may influence the atmosphere
increasing or diminishing its barometric
pressure and indirectly the rise and
fall of earth and the waters samuel
Rowbotham says bearing this fact in mind
that there exists a continual pressure
of the atmosphere upon the earth and
associating it with the fact that the
earth is a vast plain stretched out upon
the waters and it will be seen that it
must of necessity slightly fluctuate or
slowly rise and fall in the water as by
the action of the atmosphere the earth
is slowly depressed the water moves
towards the receiving shore and produces
the flood tide and when by the reaction
of the resisting ocean medium the earth
gradually ascends and the waters recede
and the ebb tide is produced this is the
general cause of tides whatever
peculiarities are observed they may be
traced to the reaction of channels bays
headlands and other local causes but the
earth has a vibratory or tremulous
motion such as must necessarily belong
to a floating in fluctuating structure
is abundantly proved by the experience
of astronomers and surveyors if
delicate spirit level be firmly placed
upon a rock or upon the most solid
foundation which it is possible to
construct the very curious phenomenon
will be observed of constant change in
the position of the air bubble however
carefully the level may be adjusted and
the instrument protected from the
atmosphere the bubble will not maintain
its position many seconds together a
somewhat similar influence has been
noticed in astronomical observatories
where instruments of the best
construction and placed in the most
approved positions cannot always be
relied upon without occasional
readjustment in the past several decades
nASA has shown video of astronauts
supposedly in low-earth orbit
experiencing complete weightlessness or
zero-gravity how is this weightless
effect achieved if gravity doesn't exist
as it turns out for the past several
decades NASA
together with Boeing have been
perfecting so-called zero-g planes and
zero-g maneuvers which are able to
produce weightlessness at any altitude
aboard modified Boeing 727s specially
trained pilots perform aerobatic
maneuvers known as parabolas planes
climb with a pitch angle of 45 degrees
using engine thrust and elevator
controls then when maximum height is
reached the craft is pointed downward at
high speed the period of weightlessness
begins while ascending and lasts all the
way up and over the parabola until
reaching a downward pitch angle of 30
degrees at which point the manoeuvre is
repeated therefore all NASA's footage of
astronauts aboard space shuttles or the
international space station can be
easily hoaxed and simulated in earth
atmosphere aboard a zero g plane in fact
watching footage of zero g plane flights
alongside footage of NASA astronauts
supposedly floating around their space
shuttles and space stations no
observable difference can be seen
between the two astronomers claim to
have measured all the planets distances
shapes orbits weights relative positions
and times of revolution all based on the
law of gravitation and without gravity
their entire cosmology folds under its
own weight without gravity people cannot
stand upside down on a ball earth
without gravity the earth and planets
cannot be revolving around the Sun
without Newtonian gravitation Einstein
II and relativity Copernican
heliocentric and the entire big bang
ball earth mythos cannot exist and falls
to pieces
gravity both metaphorically and quite
literally just does not hold any water
not as a sound theory of cosmology and
not as a law supposedly responsible for
holding in the world's oceans
William carpenter says man's experience
tells him that he is not constructed
like the flies that can live and move
upon the ceiling of a room with as much
safety as on the floor and since the
modern theory of a planetary Earth
necessitates a crowd of theories to keep
company within and one of them is that
men are really bound to the earth by a
force which fastens them to it like
needles round a spherical lodestone a
theory perfectly outrageous and opposed
to all human experience it follows that
unless we can trample upon common sense
and ignore the teachings of experience
we have an evident proof that earth is
not a globe if we could after our minds
had once been open to the light of truth
conceive of a globular body on the
surface of which human beings could
exist the power no matter by what name
it be called that would hold them on
would then necessarily have to be so
constraining and cogent that they could
not live the waters of the oceans would
have to be a solid mass for motion would
be impossible but we not only exist but
live and move in the water of the oceans
skips and dances like a thing of life
and beauty this is a proof that the
earth is not a globe Gerard Hickson said
nearly a hundred years ago Kepler
suggested that some kind of unknown
force must hold the earth and the
heavenly bodies in their places and now
Sir Isaac Newton the greatest
mathematician of his age took up the
idea and built the law of gravitation
the names derived from the Latin word
gravis which means heavy
having weight while the law of
gravitation is defined as that mutual
action between masses of matter by
virtue of which every such mass tends
toward every other with a force varying
directly as the product of the masses
inversely as the square of their
distances apart reduced simplicity
gravitation is said to be that which
attracts everything towards every other
thing that does not tell us much
and yet the little it does tell us is
not true for a thoughtful observer knows
very well that everything is not
attracted towards every other thing the
definition implies that it is a force
but it does not say so for that phrase
mutual action is ambiguous and not at
all convincing Gabriele Henriette says
the system of gravitation which makes
the Sun the moving center of the
universe The awkward principles of which
are anything but certain since they
apply to invisible circumstances so that
they cannot be checked is he replaced by
the old geocentric system universally
accepted until the 17th century in view
of course of its indisputable obvious
--mess and in which the earth in a state
of immobility and surrounded by the
planets visibly moving round it
including the Sun is at the center of
our universe these two facts which
explain almost everything are firstly
the positive existence above the earth
of a solid dome constituting the sky and
secondly the non-material nature of the
planets and constellations which are not
physical masses but merely luminous
manifestations without substance these
are the two circumstances which lead
today to the fundamental transformation
of astronomy then professor Bernstein
and his letters to the British
Association writes the theory that
motions are produced through material
attraction is absurd attributing such a
power to mere matter which is passive by
nature is a supreme illusion it is a
lovely and easy theory to satisfy any
man's mind but when the practical test
comes it falls all to pieces and becomes
one of the most ridiculous theories to
common sense and judgment never
conceived
you
kind of the making of gravity I was
gonna show the person who put this out
there at this in their video but they
have comments disabled so I'm actually
not going to and at the same time like
suspend anywhere in his singing with
this computation I mean it's literally
like these rigs had your life in their
hands if something broke
I had nothing to hold on to some camera
came crashing through my face nothing I
could do you just say goodbye the Sentra
has these dancer background so she took
this approach of prepping herself for a
very complicated choreography she
trained like crazy for five months so
that she could work with those rigs
without conveying the tension of the
race so in the moment of the performance
is just pure expression
whether it was the cage or whatever
rigging system they had you just
embraced the pain because these were all
unique creations of brilliant people who
had to think of something that doesn't
exist in order to make a movie
Alfonzo was told couldn't be done
did you guys hear that had to think of
something that doesn't exist to create a
movie they said couldn't be made these
were all unique creations of brilliant
people who had to think of something
that doesn't exist these were all unique
creations of brilliant people who had to
think of something that doesn't exist
International Space Station and
spacewalks yeah Explorer permission to
retrieve dr. stone exactly liars I'm Don
Pettit I'm a NASA astronaut and I'm on
the International Space Station I'd go
to the moon in a nanosecond the problem
is we don't have the technology to do
that anymore we used to but we destroyed
that technology and it's a painful
process to build it back again my name
is Kelly Smith and I work on navigation
and guidance for Orion as we get further
away from Earth we'll pass through the
Van Allen belts an area of dangerous
radiation
radiation like this could harm the
guidance systems onboard computers or
other electronics on arrival naturally
we have to pass through this danger zone
twice once up and once back but Orion
has protection shielding will be put to
the test as the vehicle cuts through the
waves of radiation sensors aboard will
record radiation levels for scientists
to study we must solve these challenges
before we send people through this
region of space
the problem is we don't have the
technology to do that anymore we used to
but we destroyed that technology the
kinds of technologies that we're testing
out on Space Station are definitely
helping us with our goals of going
beyond low-earth orbit so we have a
really robust exploration program at
NASA we're also really pushing the
boundaries in terms of where we're going
forward with exploration I think humans
are naturally driven to do this and this
is really the beginning I think of human
beings leaving low-earth orbit I
certainly plan on being around to see
that the plan that NASA has is to build
a rocket called SLS which is a
heavy-lift rocket it's something that is
that is much bigger than what we have
today and it will be able to launch the
Orion capsule with humans on board as
well as Landers or other components -
via two destinations beyond Earth orbit
right now we only can fly in Earth orbit
that's the farthest that we can go and
this new system that we're building is
going to allow us to go beyond and
hopefully take humans into the solar
system to explore so the moon Mars
asteroids there's a lot of destinations
that we could go to and we're building
these building block components in order
to allow us to do that eventually once
we once we travel beyond low-earth orbit
the crew will be exposed to larger
amounts of radiation so we have to
design both the crew protection systems
and our electronic systems to withstand
this radiation early in the next decade
a set of crewed flights will test and
prove the systems required for
exploration beyond low Earth orbit
the problem is we don't have the
technology to do that anymore we used to
but we destroyed that technology and
it's a painful process to build it back
again
so there's a rumor going around that the
earth spins on its axis roughly 360
degrees in 24 hours there are a number
of experiments and demonstrations that
can prove this once we've proof is the
ability of a spinning gyroscope to
remain rigid in space whilst the Earth
spins below the US Navy put out a
training video in 1960 explaining this
using diagrams as shown here the link to
the entire video is in the description
not only is it alleged to remain rigid
in space the angle that the gyroscope
quote-unquote appears to rotate is said
to be measurable using a very simple
equation which is wholly dependent on
your latitude on earth and the actual
orientation of the gyro so through maths
and based on an assumption that a
spherical earth is rotating about this
axis we shall be able to predict the
angle that the gyroscope will rotate
over a given time at a given latitude
this notion has been accepted as fact by
modern day science without a shred of
evidence to support it no where can I
find any video that demonstrates this
apparent proof I found the same
assertion made about apparent drift all
over the internet including on aviation
websites like this one which gives more
illustrations and the same equations for
calculating the drift my experiment /
demonstration which is coming up next
will be done using the super precision
gyrus cable these are manufactured here
in England and if you haven't guessed by
the name they're works of precision
engineering to exacting standards here's
a video by the manufacturer
just like you always wanted novel
innovative and precise the fascinating
properties of gyroscopes with their
ability to maintain position and
seemingly gravity-defying properties
will mesmerize both young and old alike
the super precision gyroscope is
beautifully designed and manufactured to
the highest precision the gyroscope
comes complete with its own electric
starter motor there's no need for string
to start it it's less fiddly spins the
gyro much faster and doesn't put load to
the delicate bearings even when spinning
at 12,000 revolutions per minute there
is hardly any noise or vibration and
when it's under full steam it spins for
a very long time the gimbals
are modular allowing you to construct
numerous configurations you can build
the standard setups to demonstrate
mutation and precession plus you can
make your own setups to perform your
experiments the parts screw together as
well as seven places around the
gyroscope frame it will provide hours of
amusement and learning by showing just
how gyroscopic forces affect our daily
lives today they can be found in
aircraft satellites and many other
titles systems
from solid brass aircraft-grade aluminum
and stainless steel all of the
components are precisely manufactured
with state-of-the-art machines we use
some of the most accurate equipment
available to detect the slightest
imbalance
the brass rotor is dynamically balanced
to within a few thousandths of a gram
and assembled with ultra-low noise
bearings this meticulous attention to
detail produces a true precision
instrument that will last for years the
set includes the super precision
gyroscope with electric starter motor
and Gimbels kit complete with manuals
and storage case our gyroscope is ideal
for schools universities or anyone who
just enjoys using well engineered kit it
also makes a great gift for those with
inquisitive muscles
okay so this is the setup I'm going to
be using and you'll notice this side
there's like a blanking insert that goes
into the bearing housing on this side
and on this side you attach the motor so
the hole is empty just the with the
spindle sticking through so I quickly
realized that when I spun this thing up
due to the presence of material here and
the absence of material here there was a
weight in balance so I'll contact the
manufacturer and ask them if this is
expected and they confirmed it was and
offered to make me a one-off and insert
to go in here for free and they also
suggested that what I could do is use
some play-doh some kids plasticine so I
did that got some of my daughter's
play-doh just spin it up to speed with
the motor and then inserted this into
the hole seems to do the trick I was
able to balance it perfectly before I
put this in the the extra weight because
they start to drop every time and it was
over here it would drop this way so
that's how I overcame that and I've
attached the whole setup to a protractor
which have blue tacked to the table and
a blue TAC D yet till then the frame to
the table as well so this here is the
angle that we're looking for so what
we're looking for is this effect
see how the jury wants to rotate and say
in the original orientation
well that angle that is rotating but
this bar is to be rotating the other
device that is the angle that we're
looking for that's the angle that we
should be able to calculate this
gyroscope moving due to the rotation of
the earth underneath us so without
further ado let's get on to the test
so I've just attached the motor there
and we actually takes four AAA batteries
to power it and I've run this test quite
a number of times now for quite a few
batteries through it so I kind of know
how long they're going to last and what
sort of sound comes from the motor
depending on how much power is left in
the batteries I'd say there's about over
75% power left in them in a minute very
much based on 12,000 rpm maximum that's
probably about 8 or 9,000 rpm for this
particular test
let's get up to speed now and remove the
motor and replace it with the piece of
play-doh get it perfectly balanced
and I'm going to demonstrate some
procession by gently pressing on the
horizontal bar there and now I'm going
to line it up the best I can so that you
cannot see the the Brack the brass
flywheel from above and it's it is sort
of them straight up and down as possible
so if we just take note of where we are
now it you can see it a zero on the top
right just the top to the right of the
bar you can see a zero just there and
you'll notice that you cannot see the
brass and flywheel from the bottom now
so we are sort of dead center above it
then now it's just a waiting game
so while the weights let's just have a
look at a brief history of the gyroscope
look to the point where it was first
proposed that it could record the spin
of the earth so this is just one example
I found on the internet there are lots
and lots of different accounts and they
all differ slightly but this one seemed
like a sort of all-around recount of
history so in early times people
discovered the spinning top a toy with
the unique ability to balance upright
while rotating rapidly ancient Greek
Chinese and raymon societies built tops
for games and entertainment the Maori in
New Zealand have you tummy tops with
specially crafted holes in mourning
ceremonies in 14th century England some
villagers had a large top constructed
for a warming up exercise in cold
weather tops were even used in place of
dice it was not until the late 18th and
19th centuries that scientists and
sailors began attempting to use spinning
tops as a scientific tool at the time
sailors relied on sexton's for
navigation
measuring the angle between specific
Stars and the horizon this method was
limited however if choppy seas or fog
obscured the truth horizon or clouds
obscured the Stars surcin an English
scientist noted in the 1740s that the
spinning top had a tendency to remain
level even when the surface on which he
rested was tilting he suggested that
sailors could use it as an artificial
horizon on ships
unfortunately when Susan went to sea to
test the idea the ship sank and everyone
was lost a French scientist in the 19th
century
larae created a top that was
continuously powered by air gas blowing
into mini-book is on the rim of the
wheel a process that had been used for
thousands of jyro since the first modern
gyroscope was designed in the early
eighteen hundreds by Johan Gottlieb
Friday on the
a professor at the University of
Tubingen in Germany it was made with a
heavy ball instead of a wheel but since
it had no scientific application it
faded into history in the mid 19th
century the spinning top acquired the
named gyroscope there not through its
use as a navigational tool French
scientists léon foucault had
experimented with a long heavy pendulum
in an attempt to observe the rotation of
the earth the pendulum is set swinging
back and forth along the north-south
plane while the earth turned beneath is
Foucault corroborated the observation by
using a spinning top in a similar manner
he placed a wheel rotating at high speed
in a supporting ring in such a way that
the axis of the spinning wheel could
move independently of the ring
in fact supporting ring moved over the
course of a day as it was connected to
the surface of the rotating earth the
axis of the wheel remained pointed in
its original direction confirming that
the earth was rotating in a 24-hour
period fuck-off named his spinning wheel
a gyroscope from the Greek words gyros
which is revolution and scope in which
is to see he had seen the revolution of
the earth with his gyroscopes so from
Wikipedia jean-bernard léon foucault
born 18th of september 1819 was a French
physicist best known for his
demonstration of the fall called
pendulum the device demonstrating the
effect of the Earth's rotation he also
made an early measurement at the speed
of light discovered eddy currents and is
credited with naming the gyroscope
although he did not invent it Foucault
was the son of a publisher in Paris
where he was born after an education
received chiefly at home he studied
medicine which had abandoned in favour
of physics due to a blood phobia he
first directed his attention to the
improvement of Lewy dagur's
photographic processes for three years
he was experimental assistant to Alfred
Donny in his course of lectures on
microscopic anatomy in 1851 he provided
an experimental demonstration of the
rotation of Earth on its axis and became
well known to the public by vocals were
Foucault achieved the demonstration by
showing the rotation of the plane of
oscillation of a long and heavy pendulum
suspended from the roof of the pantheon
in Paris the experiment caused the
sensation in both to learn and unpopular
worlds and Foucault pendulums were
suspended in major cities across Europe
and America attracting large crowds in
the following year he used unnamed the
gyroscope as conceptually simpler
experimental proof in 1855 he received
the Copley medal of the Royal Society
for his very remarkable experimental
researchers in 1862
4-quart was made a member of the bureau
de longitudes and an officer of the
Legion of Honour he became a member of
the Royal Society of London in 1864 and
a member of the mechanical section of
the Institute a year later he's also
credited with determining the speed of
light to be two hundred ninety-eight
thousand kilometres per second which is
only 0.6 percent in era of the currently
accepted value and devising a method of
testing the mirror or a reflecting
telescope to determine its shape so
reading between the lines he was a man
of a significant academic accomplishment
and recognition at the time one has to
wonder then why when you read the book a
PD article about Leon focal does it have
this one line at the end near his death
he returned to Roman Catholicism that he
had previously abandoned draw your own
conclusions so going back to the test
we've exceeded six minutes now and
there's no observable movement you can
still see the zero to the right of the
bar in its entirety and he's still
cannot see the brass flywheel from above
so how much should the gyro have
processed what angle should the gyros
axis have moved the calculation is the
sine of the latitude times 15 degrees
per hour
my current latitude is exactly fifty
three point zero six degrees north so
the angle in which the gyro should have
moved in six minutes is 1.2 degrees now
this doesn't sound a lot but let's
assume that Leon for kosis parents were
performed in Paris he should have seen
even less based on his at latitude and
let's not forget that he didn't have an
electric motor
spinning his gyro up to 9,000 rpm so I'm
just going to stop it now you saw then
that there was still plenty of energy
left in that flywheel and it was able to
process when I moved it so out of sheer
curiosity I decided to fix the motor to
the gyro and put a counterweight on the
other side which is slightly heavier
than the motor so I counterweight at the
counterweight with more play-doh that's
all I got it perfectly balanced and
round the motor for
ten minutes on this one I'll show you a
few minutes of effort I'm going to show
the whole lot because anybody wants me
to I can upload the whole video is
pretty boring it was nothing and but
this is now the equivalent of I guess
and modern aviation navigational
aviation instruments and you know with
sustained rotation in vocals tests and
the rotational velocity would have been
continually decreasing if the batteries
are fully charged I can actually get
about 19 minutes of sustained rotation
once I've taken the motor off and which
is a hell of a lot from this gyroscope
and I did actually try putting the motor
on and keeping it on and just running it
and I think it was for about an hour
with a full set of batteries and still
observed absolutely no movement
whatsoever so it appears that whether
you've got the motor on or you've got it
up to speed and then taking it off it
doesn't matter
still doesn't move so I just cooked to
10 minutes like say if anybody wants me
to upload the whole 10 minutes I will or
if anybody wants to see me put you
through for an hour with the motor on a
video that I'm sure you know
as well bearing in mind that after an
hour he should have rotated about 12
degrees these are some of the gyros that
léon foucault used in his experiments
the large one at the back console of the
wooden tower was a later addition that
one wasn't manufactured until 1867 but
the the ones at the front were all part
of the same settle and they were
demonstrated in 1852 so 15 years earlier
and what what you do is you take the
flywheel out of the gimballed
the brass gimble stand on the right and
you place it in this wooden sort of
housing and spin it up quite how it was
spun up isn't clear really fun at our
but once it's up to speed then then take
it out of this wooden frame and
transport it back into the brass gimble
set then you see the long pointing arm
the white pointing arm coming from the
sort of axis the rotational axis there
onto the little measuring stand which
would have had graduations marked on it
and then with the eyeglass he would he
would look through it and see what these
of rotation is so you can see what we're
looking at is very very tiny amount and
that's due to the fact that he couldn't
spin his gyro up for very long back then
Oh some of the sources I found said it
was only between 100 150 and 200 rpm
which shorter than samurai because I
think I've been that so quickly with a
piece of strength wrapped around the
spindle well that's what it says and so
you won't have that long to actually get
this reading before the gyros slowed
down to a stop what maybe three four
minutes let's give him the benefit of
the doubt and say five minutes so based
on a latitude in Paris that's less than
1 degrees movement in 5 minutes so you
can start to see why he needs the
extended arm to sort of exaggerate the
angle and the sort of magnifying
telescope looking device because the
movement is extremely small now this
movement could purely be down to a
weight imbalance like I had or it could
be the friction in the bearings
remember this was 1852 technology wasn't
as it is today and if you remember on
the manufacturers video they said that
there's absolutely no load on these
bearings so whether he was lying about
seeing any movement or whether he did
see some movement but it was just due to
the inferior setup we had I guess we'll
never know
now some of you might be thinking and
aircraft directional gyros do actually
drift and this is true the pilot has to
realign the gyro compass with the
magnetic compass every 15 minutes that's
good practice on a lot from personal
experience and and this is said to
happen because of apparent drift they
say it quite clearly in the 1960s US
Navy video that I've linked to and they
blame this completely on apparent drift
I'm gonna try and simulate what I think
is happening and why pilots have to
realign the compass every 15 minutes so
what I've done is up aligns the vertical
peg here with the vertical casing of the
gyro there and aligned it and this bar
the bottom bar there with this foot here
with its third foot so I'm going to
simulate turbulence and vibration from
the aircraft track changes and by put by
just wiggling this bar
so this is only a gradual thing every 15
minutes it drifts out slightly and it
varies as well sometimes it drifts
quicker than other times and as pilots
will be aware and after any sudden or
hard banks or you know sort of large
turns the compass seems to drift even
further and quicker so let's realign me
that's not not they've been doing it for
long you know get a few more
there you can see it's all it's already
drifting that way and it doesn't matter
which way it just depends on the bias of
the turn or the bias of the number of
turns in any particular direction it
will tend to drift that way now you can
see look it's gone quite a long way out
now so that's why I think accounts for
the and the corrections that the pilot
must make every 15 minutes to realign
the gyro compass with the magnetic
compass and what to be able to fish off
horizon
that's a gyro as well why doesn't that
need and resetting every 15 minutes
surely that would be subject to the
exact same drift as the directional gyro
but it's actually considered bad
practice to realign your artificial
horizon during flight because you don't
know whether you aligning it to a
straight and level orientation so why
does the directional gyro drift that the
artificial horizon gyro doesn't well I
believe it's because the directional
gyro is to axis so it's allowed to move
this way and it's allowed to move this
way but if it moves this way the actual
flywheel moves with it
in a 3-axis gyro it can actually move
this the axis can move this way but the
gyro flywheel stays aligned like this
but logically if the if the directional
gyro precesses due to wanting to remain
rigid in space and the artificial
horizon gyro would necessarily have to
do the same but he doesn't so for all
the naysayers out there who think I
might be somehow deceiving or I'm doing
something wrong be my guest
get yourself a gyro and demonstrate it
and rotating or appearing to rotate and
to the exact angle because it should
wear like clockwork if you're not
willing to do that and then you are just
accepting the word of some dude that
performed an experiment 164 years ago
that you've never witnessed yourself and
nobody else alive today has ever
witnessed
after all it's a really easy experiment
all you need to do is get a perfectly
balanced gyroscope set it running and
wait you can't really do much wrong
thanks for watching
earth is a level motionless plane that
the Sun Moon and stars revolving over
and around us just as you experience
every day the North Pole is the magnetic
monopole center point with Polaris the
North Pole star situated directly above
Polaris is the only motionless star in
the heavens with all the other
constellations revolving perfect circles
over the earth every night the so-called
planets known to the ancients as
wandering stars were named such because
they were observed then as we can
observe today to wander the heavens
taking their own unique spirograph like
patterns making both forward and
retrograde motions over and around the
earth during their cycles meanwhile the
fixed stars were named such because they
were observed then as we can observe
today to stay fixed in their
constellation patterns
night after night year after year
century after century never changing
their relative positions if earth was
truly a tilting wobbling spinning space
ball as NASA and modern astronomy
proclaim rotating a thousand miles per
hour on its axis revolving 67,000 miles
per hour around the Sun spiraling five
hundred thousand miles per hour around
the galaxy and shooting off several
million more miles per hour through the
universe the star patterns would never
look the same two nights in a row let
alone be fixed in exactly the same
constellations for thousands upon
thousands of years
the reality is that the earth and
Polaris do not move while everything
else in the heavens revolves over earth
and around Polaris east to west like in
a planetarium dome our earth planetarium
however is so vast that perspective
won't allow any observer to see all the
stars simultaneously from any one
vantage point we can see Polaris ursa
major and minor and other northern
constellations from every point north of
the Equator simultaneously but
conversely cannot see the so-called
South Pole star Sigma octant s the
Southern Cross or other outer
constellations simultaneously from every
point south of the Equator because they
all sweep over a great southern arc from
their rise in the evening to their
setting in the morning facing north the
Stars turn counterclockwise from right
to left facing south they turn clockwise
from left to right facing east they rise
in front and set behind while facing
west they rise behind and set in front
so their apparent motion angle and
inclination changes depending where you
are on earth and what direction you are
facing but their actual movement is
always east to west
