(classical string music)
- So, our question for the day
is did the Brontosaurus exist?
Yes.
If you enjoyed this video
make sure you hit like,
subscribe to our channel,
and check out these other
videos right over here.
See ya.
(tape rewinding)
The full thing.
Yeah it sure did, but
like so many answers,
this one spawns a lot more questions.
Let's back up.
Whoa, whoa, whoa, not that
far, we're just going to 1877.
(bell dings)
Better.
The confusion over the Brontosaurus
stems partially from confusion
in biological taxonomy.
But also, from a bitter
rivalry of paleontologists.
Meet Othniel Charles Marsh
and Edward Drinker Cope.
They became good enough friends
while studying natural history together
that in the 1860s they even named
newly discovered fossils after each other.
But, Marsh was ambitious.
Like, Slytherin ambitious.
When Cope showed him
around the fossil quarry
in camaraderie, Marsh struck a deal
with the quarry owner behind Cope's back.
All the fossils found there and
the profits attached to them
went straight to Marsh.
And it sparked what history
calls the Bone Wars,
a fiery race to find and publish papers
about new ancient creatures.
One of those creatures
was the Apatosaurus ajax,
a huge plant eater with
a long neck and tail
that Marsh discovered in 1877.
The skeleton was incomplete,
but Marsh wanted the
credit for finding it,
so he slapped on the head of
another dinosaur found nearby,
a Camarasaurus, in his
published reconstruction.
Then in 1885, Marsh's fossil collectors
sent him a set of bones
belonging to a larger
long-necked, long-tailed
herbivore, a more complete set.
Marsh decided it was a different animal
and published his discovery
of the Brontosaurus excelsus.
His illustration of its skeleton
was the first dinosaur sketch
to receive wide lay circulation
and it caught the public's imagination.
His haste was understandable.
Cope was battling Marsh's
superior connections
by practicing what's been
called taxonomic carpet-bombing.
He would publish 1,400
articles in his 56 years.
The two former buddies slandered
and sabotaged each other
into financial and reputational ruin.
Our friends over at Stuff
You Missed in History Class
did a whole podcast two-parter on it.
Back to the Brontosaurus.
Shortly after Cope and Marsh's deaths,
a paleontologist studying Marsh's work
noticed that the Apatosaurus
and Brontosaurus skeletons
were really similar.
So similar that the scientific community
deemed the Brontosaurus
exelsus an adult specimen
of the Apatosaurus genus.
So in 1903, Brontosaurus
lost its official status.
(audience groaning)
But museums, it seems,
didn't get the memo.
Starting in 1905, the sauropod
started seeing display
around the world, labeled
Brontosaurus excelsus,
sometimes with a Camarasaurus head.
It wasn't until the 1990s
that these pervasive mistakes
were corrected at large.
But, the story doesn't end there.
In April of 2015,
a group led by paleontologist
Emanuel Tschopp
published a study analyzing
81 sauropod specimens.
According to their findings,
they reported not only
that Marsh's Brontosaurus
excelsus skeleton
has enough differences to be
considered its own species,
but that there should be
two additional species
in the Brontosaurus genus.
For now, the Brontosaurus
isn't back for sure.
It's up to the scientific
community to come to a consensus
on whether Brontosaurus and Apatosaurus
deserve their own separate genera.
But the thunder lizard
certainly wasn't a fake.
Marsh was just a jerk.
So, what do you think?
Will the Brontosaurus always
live on in your heart?
Let me know in the comments.
While you're at it, give us a
like if you enjoyed this video
and subscribe so you
won't miss the next one.
And for lots more about everything
from dinosaurs to drag racing,
visit us at HowStuffWorks.com.
