>>> HI, I'M BILL O'REILLY.
THANKS FOR WATCHING US
TONIGHT.
ANARCHY IN AMERICA.
THAT'S THE SUBJECT OF
TONIGHT'S TALKING POINTS
MEMO.
WE ARE A NATION OF LAWS NO
LONGER.
WE SAW THAT YESTERDAY IN THE
SENATE AS 44 DEMOCRATS AND
ONE REPUBLICAN KIRK OF
ILLINOIS VOTED AGAINST
DEFUNDING SANCTUARY CITIES
AS WELL AS PUNISHING ILLEGAL
ALIEN FELONS WHO DEFY
DEPORTATION.
45 SENATORS FAILED TO UPHOLD
FEDERAL LAW VIOLATING THEIR
OATH OF OFFICE.
WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE?
SAD TRUTH.
THERE IS VERY LITTLE.
IN SAN FRANCISCO YESTERDAY
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
DIRECTLY INSULTED THE FAMILY
OF KATE STEINLE.
THE YOUNG WOMAN WHO WAS
MURDERED BY ILLEGAL ALIEN
FELON WHO WAS RELEASED FROM
A STRAND JAIL AFTER FEDERAL
AUTHORITIES ASKED THE
SHERIFF TO HOLD HIM.
THE SUPERVISORS VOTED TO
RETAIN THEIR SANCTUARY CITY
POLICY AND NOT COOPERATE
WITH FEDERAL AUTHORITIES
WHEN ASKED TO DETAIN
CRIMINALS.
IF YOU THINK THAT'S
OUTRAGEOUS, LISTEN TO THIS
SOUND BITE DIRECTED AT KATE
STEINLE'S FAMILY AND
SUPPORTERS.
>> WE CANNOT ALLOW ONE EVENT
TO DICTATE 25 YEARS, 25
YEARS OF OUR CITY'S POLICIES
TOWARDS UNDOCUMENTED
IMMIGRANTS IN OUR CITY.
[ APPLAUSE ]
AND MORE IMPORTANTLY, MORE
IMPORTANTLY, WE CANNOT ALLOW
HATEFUL CONSERVATIVE NEWS
STATIONS TO DRIVE HOW WE
RESPOND TO INCIDENTS IN OUR
CITY.
I'M NOT AFRAID OF FOX NEWS.
AND THEY DON'T INFLUENCE HOW
I MAKE MY POLICY DECISIONS
HERE IN SAN FRANCISCO.
[CHEERS AND APPLAUSE]
>> SO LET ME BE VERY CLEAR.
THAT WOMAN IS A DISGRACE.
AND IF I WERE THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF THE UNITED
STATES, I WOULD IMMEDIATELY
PLACE HER UNDER ARREST.
I MIGHT NOT WIN THE CASE,
BUT I WOULD SEND A MESSAGE
TO ALL SUBVERSIVE OFFICE
HOLDERS IN THIS COUNTRY THAT
IF YOU DO NOT OBEY FEDERAL
LAW, YOU YOURSELF WILL BE
PROSECUTED.
AND WHERE IS PRESIDENT OBAMA
ON UPHOLDING THE LAW?
WHAT DOES HE HAVE TO SAY
ABOUT HIS OWN PARTY'S VOTE
IN THE SENATE?
THE PRESIDENT IS SILENT.
NOW, IF CONGRESS DOESN'T
BELIEVE IMMIGRATION LAW IS
GOOD FOR AMERICA CHANGE IT,
DON'T DEFY IT BECAUSE THEN
EVERY SINGLE AMERICAN CAN
PICK AND CHOOSE WHAT LAW TO
OBEY UNDER EQUAL JUSTICE FOR
ALL, RIGHT?
NO QUESTION THAT OUR ELECTED
OFFICIALS IN WASHINGTON AND
IN PLACES LIKE SAN FRANCISCO
ARE ACTIVE LI UNDERMINING
THE RULE OF LAW IN THIS
COUNTRY.
WHAT KIND OF MESSAGE DOES IT
SEND WHEN THE SENATE
CONDONES A CITY LIKE SAN
FRANCISCO RELEASING A
SEVEN-TIME FOREIGN FELON WHO
WHO THEN KILLS AN INNOCENT
WOMAN?
AS FOR THE CITY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, IT'S HOPELESS.
A FREE FIRE ZONE OF
ANTIESTABLISHMENT BEHAVIOR.
AS TALKING POINTS STATED
YESTERDAY, THERE COMES A
POINT WHEN THE AMERICAN
PEOPLE HAVE TO RISE UP AND
ELECT RESPONSIBLE PEOPLE TO
RUN THE COUNTRY AND THROW
OUT THE IRRESPONSIBLE
PEOPLE.
RIGHT NOW YOU KNOW WHAT?
THINGS ARE OFFICIALLY OUT OF
CONTROL HERE.
THAT'S THE MEMO.
NOW FOR THE TOP STORY,
REACTION.
JOINING US FROM WASHINGTON
SENATOR TED CRUZ WHO DID
VOTE YESTERDAY TO WERE
SANCTUARY CITIES AND KATE'S
LAW.
YOU VOTED ON LEGISLATION
KATE'S LAW AS A STAND ALONE.
WHY DID THAT NOT HAPPEN?
>> WELL, BILL, I AGREE WITH
YOU AND I'M THE AUTHOR OF
KATE'S LAW AND THE SENATE
INTRODUCED IT MONTHS AGO AND
CERTAINLY HAVE BEEN PRESSING
FOR A VOTE ON IT AS A STAND
ALONE.
REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP
DECIDED TO BIND THEM
TOGETHER.
I FILED IT AGAIN THIS TIME
ON THE SENATE FLOOR SO IT'S
AVAILABLE ON THE CALENDAR TO
BE PULLED UP DIRECTLY KATE'S
LAW FOR A VOTE ON IT.
I HOPE THAT LEADERSHIP DOES
THAT.
I THINK YOU ARE RIGHT WE
OUGHT TO HAVE A CLEAR VOTE.
>> WHEN YOU ARE TALKING
LEADERSHIP YOU ARE TALKING
MITCH MCCONNELL HE IS THE
LEADER OF THE SENATE.
>> MITCH MCCONNELL MAJORITY
LEADER DECIDES WHAT TO ALLOW
ON THE FLOOR OF THE SENATE.
>> NOW, I TRIED TO CALL
MITCH MCCONNELL AND HE WOULD
NOT TAKE MY CALL WHICH I
THOUGHT WAS KIND OF
DISRESPECTFUL BECAUSE ALL I
WANTED WAS INFORMATION.
I HAVE A VERY SIMPLE
QUESTION.
WHY DID YOU DECIDE TO PUT
SANCTUARY CITIES WITH KATE'S
LAW WHEN YOU KNEW THAT THE
DEMOCRATS WOULD FILIBUSTER
AND NO VOTE WOULD TAKE
PLACE?
EVERYONE KNEW THAT CORRECT,
SENATOR?
EVERYONE KNEW THERE WASN'T
GOING TO BE A VOTED, RIGHT?
>> I THINK EVERYONE KNEW
THAT WAS THE LIKELY OUTCOME
AND.
>> SO WHY WOULD SENATOR
MCCONNELL DO THAT?
FOR WHAT REASON?
>> WELL, AS I EXPLAIN
YESTERDAY ON THE SENATE
FLOOR, THERE WAS VALUE TO
HAVING A VOTE YESTERDAY TO
GET PEOPLE ON RECORD BUT IT
WAS LIKELY JUST TO BE A SHOW
VOTE BECAUSE THE DEMOCRATS
WOULD BLOCK IT.
AND IF WE'RE GOING TO GET
THIS PASSED INTO LAW, THE
ONLY WAY I BELIEVE TO DO SO
IS TO ATTACH IT TO MUST-MAST
LEGISLATION.
THAT'S WHAT I URGED
REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP TO
COULD.
>> PEOPLE DON'T KNOW WHAT
MUST-PASS LEGISLATION IS.
WHAT IS THAT?
>> SO THAT MEANS LEGISLATION
EITHER THE CONTINUING
RESOLUTION OR AN OMNIBUS
APPROPRIATIONS BILL OR DEBT
CEILING.
LEGISLATION THAT HAS TO PASS
INTO LAW.
IF YOU WANT TO GET AN ACTUAL
CHANGE IN LAW.
>> WHY CAN'T YOU, LOOK,
ISN'T IT WORTH THE AMERICAN
PEOPLE KNOWING EXACTLY WHO
WILL NOT VOTE FOR KATE'S
LAW?
JUST THAT LAW?
SEE, SANCTUARY CITIES IS A
BIGGER DEAL.
AND THE LIBERALS CAN HIDE
BEHIND ALL KINDS OF THEORY.
BUT KATE'S LAW ISN'T.
ARE YOU GOING TO PROTECT THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE FROM
AGGRAVATED FELONS WHO COME
BACK AFTER BEING DEPORTED OR
NOT?
YES OR NO?
AND I THINK IT'S INSTRUCTIVE
FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO
SEE WHO SAYS KNOW BECAUSE
THEN, ANYONE RUNNING AGAINST
THEM FOR THE SENATE CAN SAY,
LOOK, ARE YOU GOING TO VOTE
FOR SOMEBODY WHO IS LOOKING
OUT FOR THE AGGRAVATED
FELONS WHO LIVE IN FOREIGN
COUNTRIES?
IS THAT HOW WANT TO SERVE?
THAT REALLY REALLY PUTS
PRESSURE ON THE OTHER SIDE,
DOES IT NOT?
>> BILL, I THINK YOU ARE
EXACTLY RIGHT.
SO I HAD BEEN PRESSING FOR
MONTHS FOR A STAND ALONE
VOTE ON KATE'S LAW WHICH IS
MY BILL.
AND, LET ME SAY THANK YOU
FOR ALL OF THE LEADERSHIP
YOU HAVE PROVIDED.
>> THAT'S OKAY.
BECAUSE I'M NOT DOING IT FOR
ANY OTHER REASON BUT FOR
KATE STEINLE'S FAMILY.
THEY ARE COMING UP RIGHT
BEHIND YOU.
THAT'S THE REASON AND I'M
DOING IT BECAUSE IT'S THE
RIGHT THING BUT PRIME
MERRIMANLY BECAUSE I
PROMISED THEM.
ALL RIGHT.
NOW,.
>> BILL, LET ME SAY, I HAVE
HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO VISIT
WITH KATE CAN STEINLE'S
FAMILY.
THEY CAME AND TESTIFIED IN
THE SENATE JUDICIARY
COMMITTEE.
>> YEP.
>> WHAT I URGED SENATE
DEMOCRATS TO DO IS LOOK THEM
IN THE EYES AND EXPLAIN WHY
THEY ARE CHOOSING TO STAND
WITH CONVICTED FELONS LIKE
THE MURDERER OF KATE STEINLE
RATHER THAN WITH THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE.
THE PEOPLE WE SHOULD BE
STANDING AND PROTECTING.
>> THAT'S WHAT IT IS ALL
ABOUT.
I THINK MITCH MCCONNELL WILL
FINALLY PUT IT UP FOR A
STAND ALONE.
WE ENCOURAGE ALL AMERICANS
TO CALL HIS OFFICE IN
WASHINGTON.
WE HAVE NUMBER ON BILL
O'REILLY.COM TO SUGGEST THAT
HE DO THAT.
YOU THINK IT'S GOING TO BE
UP FOR A VOTE, TOO.
RIGHT?
 THE MOST EFFECTIVE.  SO AND
WAY TO MAKE THAT HAPPEN IS
FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO
HOLD OUR POLITICIANS
ACCOUNTABLE.
>> ABSOLUTELY.
ALL RIGHT.
PAUL RIPE, LOOKS LIKE IS HE
GOING TO RUN FOR SPEAKER OF
THE HOUSE.
DO YOU SUPPORT THAT?
>> YOU KNOW, I'M STAYING OUT
OF THAT.
>> COME ON, COME ON, COME
ON.
YOU ARE A POWERFUL SENATOR.
YOU ARE A CONSERVATIVE GUY.
DO YOU SUPPORT PAUL RYAN OR
NOT?
>> IT'S A QUESTION FOR HOUSE
REPUBLICANS TO MAKE BUT I
WILL TELL YOU THIS.
>> I'M GOING TO SAY NO
BECAUSE IF YOU SUPPORT HIM I
KNOW YOU WOULD HAVE SAID
LOOK, I THINK THE GUY YOU IS
RIGHT FOR THE JOB SO YOU
DON'T WANT HIM THERE?
>> ACTUALLY, BILL, I HAVE
CONSISTENTLY STAYED OUT OF
HOUSE LEADERSHIP ELECTIONS.
LET ME TELL YOU WHAT I THINK
THE NEXT SPEAKER SHOULD BE.
THE NEXT SPEAKER SHOULD BE
SOMEONE WHO TAKES SERIOUSLY
HONORING THE PROMISES WE
MADE TO THE MEN AND WHO
ELECTED US TO OFFICE.
>> PAUL RYAN IS A SERIOUS
MAN.
HE MAY NOT BE AS
CONSERVATIVE AS YOU ARE.
THAT'S WHAT I'M TRYING TO
GET AT.
COME ON, SENATOR, DO PEOPLE
HAVE TO BE AS CONSERVATIVE
AS YOU ARE IN ORDER TO
SERVE?
>> I AMGEN WINLY STAYING OUT
OF IT I UNDERSTAND IT MAKES
FOR BETTER TV FOR ME TO GET
IN THE MIDDLE OF THAT I'M
GOING TO LEAVE THAT TO HOUSE
REPUBLICANS.
>> ALL RIGHT.
PRESIDENT BUSH ANONYMOUS
SOURCE, WE DON'T PUT
CREDIBILITY TO ANONYMOUS
SOURCES, I HAVE TO TELL THE
AUDIENCE.
BUT IT WAS WIDELY REPORTED
THAT HE DIDN'T LIKE YOU OR
WHATEVER IT MAY BE.
I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S TRUE.
DO YOU CARE TO COMMENT ON
THAT?
>> LISTEN, I LIKE AND
RESPECT PRESIDENT BUSH.
I WAS HONORED TO WORK FOR
HIM FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS.
I DON'T THINK IT'S
SURPRISING THAT HE IS
SUPPORTING HIS BROTHER'S
CAMPAIGN AND THAT HE IS
ATTACKING THE CANDIDATES WHO
THEY SEES A A THREAT TO THAT
CAMPAIGN.
BUT, YOU KNOW FROM, MY
PERSPECTIVE, I MET MY WIFE
HEIDI WORKING FOR GEORGE W.
BUSH AND I WILL ALWAYS BE
GRATEFUL TO HIM AND I HAVE
NO INTENTION OF
RECIPROCATING AND SAYING AN
ILL WORD ABOUT HIM.
>> ALL RIGHT.
THAT'S GOOD.
DID I ASK YOU ABOUT PAUL
RYAN?
I FORGOT.
[ LAUGHTER ]
>> I DID.
SO YOU ARE SUPPORTING HIM
THEN.
OKAY.
YOU HAVE A BIG DEBATE NEXT
WEEK.
YOU HAVE GOT TO DO WELL OR
YOU ARE TOAST.
YOU KNOW.
NO SPIN ZONE.
IF YOU DON'T DO WELL, YOU
ARE DONE.
YOU GOT ANY PLANS TO BREAK
OUT OF THAT BIG PACK?
>> IT'S INTERESTING.
THE FIRST TWO DEBATES, AFTER
THE FIRST DEBATE WE RAISED A
MILLION DOLLARS IN JUST 100
HOURS.
PEOPLE ALL OVER THE COUNTRY
GOING TO TED CRUZ.ORG.
THE SECOND DEBATE WE RAISED
A MILLION DOLLARS IN 48
HOURS PEOPLE ALL OVER THE
COUNTRY GOING TO TED
CRUZ.ORG.
SO I'M HOPEFUL THE THIRD
DEBATE WE WILL SEE
CONTINUING BUILDING
MOMENTUM.
BILL, WHAT I HAVE BEEN MOST
ENCOURAGED BY IS WE ARE
SEEING MORE AND MORE
CONSERVATIVES UNIFYING
BEHIND OUR CAMPAIGN.
THE MODERATES ARE FIGHTING
LIKE CATS AND DOGS AND
CONSERVATIVES ARE COMING
TOGETHER.
THAT'S A VERY ENCOURAGING
DEVELOPMENT IN THE RACE.
>> ALL RIGHT.
SENATOR.
GET KATE'S LAW ON THE FLOOR,
