Good afternoon, yeah, you
all have heard about Michael,
he is gravely ill at the moment,
I hope he will get better.
I also would like to thank Larry
White and his wife Peggy B,
who have taken the responsibility of
helping him through this difficult time.
So, in stepping in for him I would try
to do my best to give the presentation
in a way he would have
wanted it to be. Ok.
This is not working...
Next slide, please!
Ok. So this again here is not
doing what it should do.
Ok. So we start this talk about
catastrophic geology with a legend.
The reports we have from various
cultures, it's not just one report,
it's several reports which makes
it kind of hard to dismiss.
The picture all those reports are painting
is following, there was a time of...
time of darkness, there was dust,
so thick you couldn't see,
there were winds so fierce you could not
stand, rocks were falling from the sky,
sometimes they holed the size of trees,
also gravel and oil was coming down,
rocks mingled, so they quoted,
with the river of fire,
it was a time of mountain building
and removal, so it's that.
This kind of the agent of this kind of
catastrophes and catastrophe was Venus,
the comet Venus, as it was popularized by
Immanuel Velikovsky in Worlds in Collision.
Also there has been talk about the
Sun setting where it used to rise.
If you would take that literally it would mean
that the Earth would have reversed its rotation
so this, incident like
this we call it incident
would release 13, roughly 13 mile high
bulge of seawater at the equator,
caused by the missing
centrifugal forces.
So those waters would be rushing
north and south to the poles
depending on the rate of deceleration
and again acceleration there would be
also, of course, an east-west
component in the waters rushing.
This is something, this kind of
event, Michael calls a 'sloshing event.'
This might sound crazy
to you, but I mean,
look around you, so is the
geology of the southwest.
Also, those legendary scenarios
kind of start to make sense again
once you once you look at them through
the Electric Universe paradigm.
Because they have recent catastrophes
on a scale that is nearly imaginable.
The EU model has a different set of assumptions
from the standard model, of course.
I will not discuss those set of assumptions.
The aim here is about the explanatory power of the model.
So yeah, and now I would
like to see the next slide.
Well we're gonna have to take
a technical 5 minutes here,
and we'll get this straight up because he
you absolutely need to see these images,
Exactly.
the work of a brilliant photographer
and his eye can show us a lot.
So, we gonna give them about five
minutes over there in the booth
to get us entangled and back
bring it back down there.
So this was the slide to show to you, by the
way this is Shiprock, close to Four Corners,
a beautiful slide I can
only recommend it.
Ok. So, now let's dive into
the geology of the Southwest.
First example is Grand Canyon.
The Colorado River goes through
it, it's about a mile deep.
Look at it from above,
it looks like this.
The north rim is up here, is
roughly a thousand feet higher
than the south rim
which is down here,
which again is roughly 1,000 feet
higher than the area down here.
The standard model has the Colorado
River going, and eroding basically
the Colorado Plateau while
the plateau is rising,
somehow the river always managed to
erode away just enough, so that
the rise was counteracted and
cause, if that happened once
it would have gone around to the
south as I mentioned before
because it's a thousand feet lower
than actual rim of the Grand Canyon.
So that's kind of an
odd model I think.
Even some ideas within
the EU community like
this being created really
initially by a thunderbolt.
I personally find it a little bit
odd because this would mean that
the thunderbolt actually went through
the path of greatest resistance,
in my point of view, which I find not
very likely, would have gone through
the areal flood of Colorado
and then just went around it.
Ok.
So, Michael's model in this case
proposes time of mountain-building
while the river, the
Colorado, was already there.
It's a model of aggregation of material,
the material is of course provided by
close encounters of cometary-planetary
action as it was already discussed before.
Basically filling the air with a
lot of material, the atmosphere,
so that it was available
for the aggregation.
The river, which was already there, prevented,
where it was flowing, the aggregation.
So, basically the Canyon is growing around
the river thus creating the canyon itself.
It's different model.
It's not so much about erosion, it's about
aggregation and prevention of aggregation.
Electricity might have played also a big role
in the creation of the layers that we see,
we'll later see, in some of
Billy Yelverton's experiments,
some indications that this might
have been the case so the layering,
kind of electrical sorting
might have happened.
Here is a more detailed map and
it seems that as for post-process, call it
a post-process after the initial creation
something accentuated and expanded and
developed the side canyons of the Grand Canyon
and this might very well have
been done through a charge
flowing through the river
and through the canyon.
The reason here also is, why I'm saying
this, because if you look at those
canyons here and available drainage area over
hear there is not much drainage available
for let's say an erosional pattern
that doesn't end on the south side
it's even worse because actually the
landscape goes down to the south.
So, water would have gone the other way
so this is why Michael suggests that
after the canyon was created some
electrical current charge went through it
and helped with the development
of the scalloped walls
and accentuated and
widened the side canyons.
Also this electrical charge might have
been responsible for the schist and granite
at the bottom of the canyon because
if the charge goes through there
it's constricted in the narrow
space, the current density goes up
and this might have an effect
on the material there.
In fact the model itself contains the
ability of electricity to create rocks
out of dirt and to metamorph rocks
into different types of rocks.
There is some support for
this, experimental support
guy named Michael Anaya from Colorado
has done some experiments about this,
he was able to, for example to create a
pegmatite, a kind of metamorphic granite
from dirt, just by running
the current through it.
So, this is different model of how rocks
are created, even metamorphic rocks.
But the actual electrical forces
active here at Grand Canyon
were kind of small compared to what was
going on roughly 100 miles north at Zion.
This is Zion Canyon, on top we have shale,
mud, below it various layers of sandstone
and at some point Michael thinks
the whole area was sloshed
which means it was covered with sediment
which then later got cleaned out.
So, this is a map of the area and
you see something very odd here.
So, you see those lines?
What are those?
Kind of looks very regular as if
something came from the south
and basically ate the material, eating
into it and creating those straight lines.
We'll look a little deeper into it,
becomes more visible and the idea is that
whatever came from the south removed
the mud and shale on top of it
and yeah, basically eroded
it electrically away.
Ok now we are looking at satellite map
of the area
and can look at this color scheme here.
So, this probably appear as small
as untouched mud and shale.
Here what is has this light color
that's remnants of the shale
but it might have been morphed
into more like pottery there
it's clay, stuff like that it kind of
hardened, it's bare of any vegetation
and down below here
that's the sandstone.
So, this is what the sandstone
looks like in Grand Canyon
really scratched at least from the
outside but also from the inside.
This is another picture, the area,
notice this odd thing up here
So, it's even one there
a little bit more.
So, what could this be?
Michael thinks that was remnant of
mud and shale which kind of melted
before it could be removed
which then kept it in place.
Now let's have a look
at the wider area here.
We have Kolob Canyon over here, by the
way this is Zion, up here that's Kolob.
You can see again those straight
lines they're going up in,
the same thing we have over
here, that's Snow Canyon
and also looks like something
really was hitting this area.
So, that here basically is really something
came from the South something electrical
and hit those walls.
And interestingly, everything
to the north of those areas,
well, some places in the north of those
areas, show basalt layers, tuff layers,
just an observation.
Look at the wider area, more
to the east, again in satellite view.
Here we still have Zion, and over here practically
that's the Staircase of the Escalante.
Still we see that this discoloration patterns,
this light color continues to the east.
So, the whole area seems to
have been hit in this model.
Ok, but let's continue first
with the Snow Canyon.
This is a close-up view.
You can see what I described
before on another picture.
Here we have those lines which by
the way seem to continue up here,
it's even here.
Yeah, what was that?
I mean, if you look at it even in
more detail, would water do that?
Probably, if not, the problem
is, here it goes down.
So, if water would have done this I would
expect a similar erosion pattern to the north,
just not there.
So, I think kind of the standard
model there has some issues.
So this is another picture.
This is Bryce Canyon
in satellite view.
So, there might have been other areas which were
not hit dead-on or perpendicular if you want
So, the effect was minor compared and Bryce
Canyon seems to be an example of such region.
By the way north of Bryce you will
find a lot of the basalt, tuff.
Another example, this is Cedar
Breaks in the same area.
Again the same thing, there's
a lot of basalt nearby
and here's a picture basically
showing how it looks like.
What you can see here is that, still because it
was only grated more or less, not directly hit
there's still some
sedimentary structure there.
It's not that clear developed and
there's a little bit of vegetation there,
so, it was not that
intense at those places.
Ok, switching to another
topic, sediments.
This is a map, sedimentary
rock map of North America.
A lot of the valleys in the southwest
filled with up to 20,000 feet of sediment.
This is a lot, it basically means that we
are only seeing tops of the mountains,
the rest is under the sediment.
It's hidden.
One method of sediment distribution
we have already just discussed,
this electrical removal and then
re-deposition at other places
another option of course is the sloshing,
flooding event that I mentioned before,
when the waters rush to the poles and also
east-west depending on which just happens,
those waters are injected through
the canyons into higher regions,
let's say up to 12,000 feet.
And when the waters running
up there, the sediment basically,
from the sea, from the continents, that
are swept over is suspended in the water.
It then starts to create layers
by depositing that sediment
and it's very interesting
to see that,
I can highly recommend the so-called sedimentology
videos, from Colorado State University,
they did some tests
with that and clues and
looking at this and it seems
that when water streams,
with the given current and the current
changes, it always starts new layers,
free layers, and they are then developing
in the direction of the current.
So, it's not something like slow deposition
in standing water, that might be an option,
but it more goes like this in several
layers in parallel it's drawing,
so you can have very fast fill-in
of areas with this sediment,
which looks like it was probably millions
of years that took in the standard model.
Those experiments show very clearly
that it might have been much faster.
Also something we can
see here in this map,
is something like...
You see this?
It is kind of a roundish structure
here and this continues up here
and it goes down,
coming back to islands.
So, this is kind of stands out here,
some kind of galaxy shape actually,
on the North American continent
and the Galaxy shape, as we all know,
it's a very common
discharge pattern.
So, could it be that some electrical
event happened over North America,
which created those
mountain ranges?
It's an option.
So let's look a little bit deeper here.
This is a terrain mold of the centerpiece
and, if you look into that, some kind of
roundish structures here seem to stand out.
So let's get deeper into those.
So, the basic idea is that some
electrical event or succession of events
created basically those
mountains, removed older ones,
and redistributed sediment
all over the place.
Again, look at those here.
So, Four Corners.
That's basically the area where
we think it kind of happened
to the right you can see
this smaller inner circle.
It seems to stand out,
by the way the Ship Rock, that's
showed on the first slide,
is very close to the
center, of this circle.
So, and there seems to be
in kind of altering here
which is also kind of showing up nicely
if you look at the rock maps of the area.
Seems to be a basalt
ring going around there.
Also, what's with over
here on the right side
just put it in as the so called four
blinds of the Colorado Plateau.
If it has something to do
with this or not I can't say.
I'm just giving you the information so
that you have a perspective on that.
So the event, kind of what Michael
has in mind here, is like vortex,
think diocotron instability over
this area, that of course means,
we have vortices within
vortices, counter rotation,
but the overall main direction of the
main vortex seems to have been clockwise.
We'll come to that.
Also what's a little bit odd here is
the area around, here little bit,
which kind of initially didn't
fit because what with that,
the other areas seem to have shown
a lot of removal of material,
this area shows an aggregation.
Ok, just mentioned the basalt that's
showing up nicely here as a ring.
If you look at those in, from the standard
model, those have a little bit of a problem
because they are, often there's no
source to be found for the basalt.
There are a lot of missing volcanoes
involved actually in the standard model.
So, it's like they're there and then some kind
of very selective erosion process happens
and removes lot of basalt in
between and then the volcano,
and especially the volcano goes the stumps
and roots nowhere to be seen again.
This is kind of a
strange model, I think.
There's also something that
is called welded tuff,
basically also something
that came from volcanoes
but it's more like dusty stuff that is
welded onto in itself onto material.
Something like this.
But also the welded tuff model in the
standard description has a problem
that because often those sources for the
welded tuff are roughly 200 miles away
from the deposition.
The question remains, how does this
material stay hot in the standard model,
to be actually welded at
the deposition point.
It's probably what nature does.
I don't know. If you don't have any other
option you might come up with such ideas.
I don't know.
In Michael's model, streams of plasma, the
so-called river of fire from the legends,
was flowing over the surface of the Earth
and it could well have kept this material
which was in the air
electrically eroded,
coming from cometary material raining
down on earth and kept it hot.
So, that it actually in place in the place where
it was deposited was still able to weld actually.
This is an example of the
process how it looks like,
but in the EU model, Michael's model
it doesn't apply only to welded tuff.
It is basically the main deposition
process of all the other materials.
May be dolomite, basalt, tuff,
sandstone, you-name-it, limestone
it's all being deposited like this on
top of already existing obstacles.
It is basically the main mountain
building process in his model.
If you want to find this place, this is
at the south entrance to Death Valley,
where this photo was shot.
Here's another example, it's, I think, South
of Pahrump, the dark gray is dolomite,
the red stuff is welde tuff,
the gray light gray is shale.
Again, if you want to find
this shot from highway 170,
up there, looking at those
structures in the middle.
So, I just, before I mentioned this
place there in the Four Corners circle
where we had aggregation and
initially that didn't fit well,
but later on he came to the conclusion
that this is actually deposition,
clockwise deposition from material that
was removed at other places Canyonlands
and this area around it.
To the area in question, it
is basically the Grand Mesa,
the Gunnison River and
part of San Juan's.
That's by the way Gunnison
river with the Black Canyon,
the Grand Mesa there is
about 10,000 feet high.
The Standard model would like to see
some kind of volcanoes in the area
to provide for that basalt looking for
it north of the Gannison,
the area at he highest peaks is
roughly around 11,000 feet high
and between the Grand Mesa and this area there
is a valley which has a height of 5,000 feet.
So, in order for the standard model to
work you would have to remove 5,000 feet
of basalt without a
trace to get it there.
Think about that.
Also where is the volcano?
That's the area where
they are looking for it.
I don't see it, we're still looking,
even looking a litle deeper.
I mean, there are peaks there, but nothing that
looks like a caldera or something like that.
Anyway, this is a missing person case, we are
delightful for any hints on where to look for it.
Ok, another topic which was visible here
at the Black Canyon, Quartz Veins.
They are, ya, standard model makes them
along ongoing hydrothermal process.
The EU model, which is
kind of catastrophic,
doesn't have that amount of
time available in those areas,
so there is a replacement process
actually needed in some way.
We think it's also electrical.
Look at this for example, this
picture was shot at southeast,
I think of Domeland which
is just south of Yosemite.
It kind of looks like feathered
discharge of a Tesla coil.
So, the idea is that quartz
veins are aggregation,
accumulations from charge
running through the Earth,
but this might not also
affect silicon dioxide.
Very often we find gold in those
areas close by those quartz veins.
So, maybe there's also some
kind of transmutation involved.
Also, diamonds show up.
So ok, why do we think this
kind of model has any merit?
The last few months there was some
very delightful confirmation from,
by experiments done by Billy Yelverton
and confirmation in this case means...
it's not, I'm not saying the
process it happened like this,
it just says the experimental results of
the experiments allow for it.
So, it's kind of an option.
So, what did Billy do?
And I can recommend for you
all to look at the videos,
watch in person, I think, at 7:00 PM will
be showing them in the breakout room
and it's really interesting
what happens there.
I will be showing you
just some stills here.
So what did he do?
He had anode, cathode, electrodes being there
and he let material raining down from above.
Think cometary interaction,
having material in the atmosphere
kind of try to come up with an idea
to what is going on what's happening.
So, first thing we see here is that we have
more aggregation to the left than on the right,
also on the right we have
some not so much aggregation,
but it looks like
prevention of aggregation.
Here's another example, different mix of material,
more or less it looks like same deposition,
but even stronger are those areas where
there is no aggregation visible.
To me, this one here looks pretty much like
something that we can find on the moon.
So, the rilles on the moon
might look like this.
This is a different model, it's not
so much the model of excavation
it could also be something like
prevention of aggregation, it's an idea.
It's happening, caused
by those experiments.
Next one here, next thing Billy
tried was having water flowing
here in the straight line while material was
falling from the sky and electricity was flowing.
Well what you can
see here is that
the middle between the electrodes
there's much more aggregation
and a detailed look shows us what we can
see here are kind of scalloped walls
also there seems to be if
you look really really hard
some kind of horizontal
layering appearing here.
The material from above
was completely mixed,
so there might be go on some kind of
electrical sorting going on, depositing it.
Think Grand Canyon, lot of
horizontal layers there.
Ok, next slide.
This is kind of a control experiment, put
electrodes to the side of the river.
We still see some major
aggregation at the water flow,
not so much around
the electrodes.
On the other side we have what we
would expect simply deposition.
So, next one here
has same thing,
we have water flowing this time it
was meandering, different tests.
So again, here I think the scalloped walls
here are really really nicely visible in here
and think if you put that to scale
what kind of Canyon that would be.
Also again, these areas where we
have prevention of aggregation.
The last slides of those experiments
is a control experiment again.
What happens if we
don't put in electricity.
Those slides are quite different.
So to sum it up the Electric
Universe paradigm adds immensely,
being used, to the tool set of
geology, for geologic processes,
there are a lot more
options available.
You don't have to resort so many many
times to: "It's what nature does".
The described processes are able to resurface
the Earth in a very short period of time.
And last but not least, the scenario
connects what we find on Earth
with the catastrophic
myths and legends.
We no longer have to dismiss them
as the standard model has to.
Thank you
