CALL TO MAKE, WE WILL BRING IT
TO YOU.
TO YOU.
TUCKER, BACK TO YOU.
TUCKER, BACK TO YOU.
>> Tucker: BRET AND MARTHA,
>> Tucker: BRET AND MARTHA,
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THAT.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THAT.
TONIGHT IT CLD BE
TONIGHT IT CLD BE
BERNIE SANDERS LAST STAND AS OF
BERNIE SANDERS LAST STAND AS OF
TOMORROW MORNING, HALF OF THE
TOMORROW MORNING, HALF OF THE
DELEGATES IN THE DEMOCRATIC RACE
DELEGATES IN THE DEMOCRATIC RACE
WILL HAVE BEEN AWARDED.
WILL HAVE BEEN AWARDED.
IF SANDRA SUFFERS A LOPSIDED
IF SANDRA SUFFERS A LOPSIDED
DEFEAT IN THE NEXT FEW HOURS,
DEFEAT IN THE NEXT FEW HOURS,
HIS PATH TO THE NOMINATION WILL
HIS PATH TO THE NOMINATION WILL
ESSENTIALLY DISAPPEAR.
ESSENTIALLY DISAPPEAR.
IF THAT HAPPENS, MILLIONS OF
IF THAT HAPPENS, MILLIONS OF
BERNIE SUPPORTERS WILL WAKE UP
BERNIE SUPPORTERS WILL WAKE UP
IN THE MORNING OUTRAGED AND
IN THE MORNING OUTRAGED AND
DISAPPOINTED.
DISAPPOINTED.
THEY WILL BELIEVE SANDERS HAS
THEY WILL BELIEVE SANDERS HAS
THE NOMINATION STOLEN FROM HIM
THE NOMINATION STOLEN FROM HIM
BY A RUTHLESS DEMOCRATIC
BY A RUTHLESS DEMOCRATIC
ESTABLISHMENT FEARFUL OF CHANGE.
ESTABLISHMENT FEARFUL OF CHANGE.
TO SOME EXTENT, THEY WILL BE
TO SOME EXTENT, THEY WILL BE
RIGHT.
RIGHT.
THERE IS ANOTHER IMPORTANT
THERE IS ANOTHER IMPORTANT
REASON BERNIE SANDERS APPEARS TO
REASON BERNIE SANDERS APPEARS TO
BE LOSING TONIGHT.
BE LOSING TONIGHT.
HE IS WEAK.
HE IS WEAK.
SANDERS IS A SOCIALIST BOMB
SANDERS IS A SOCIALIST BOMB
THROWER WHO TRADES WITH FIDEL
THROWER WHO TRADES WITH FIDEL
CASTRO BUT MOSTLY TALK IN THE
CASTRO BUT MOSTLY TALK IN THE
END.
END.
UNDERNEATH IT ALL BERNIE SANDERS
UNDERNEATH IT ALL BERNIE SANDERS
MAY BE THE LAMEST REVOLUTIONARY
MAY BE THE LAMEST REVOLUTIONARY
EVER.
EVER.
TWICE IN A ROW, SANDERS HAS
TWICE IN A ROW, SANDERS HAS
TRIED TO WIN THE DEMOCRATIC
TRIED TO WIN THE DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.
PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.
TWICE IN A ROW THEY RIGGED THE
TWICE IN A ROW THEY RIGGED THE
GAME AGAINST HIM.
GAME AGAINST HIM.
IN 2016, LEAKED EMAIL SHOWS
IN 2016, LEAKED EMAIL SHOWS
DEMOCRATIC OFFICIALS OPENLY
DEMOCRATIC OFFICIALS OPENLY
MOVING FOR HILLARY CLINTON, HIS
MOVING FOR HILLARY CLINTON, HIS
OPPONENT.
OPPONENT.
THE PRIMARY DEBATES IN THAT YEAR
THE PRIMARY DEBATES IN THAT YEAR
THE WAY THEY THOUGHT WOULD HURT
THE WAY THEY THOUGHT WOULD HURT
SANDERS.
SANDERS.
THE DNC ENTERED INTO A JOINT
THE DNC ENTERED INTO A JOINT
FUND-RAISING AGREEMENT WITH HIS
FUND-RAISING AGREEMENT WITH HIS
OPPONENT, THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN.
OPPONENT, THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN.
REMARKABLE.
REMARKABLE.
THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY DID MORE TO
THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY DID MORE TO
THE PROCESS FOUR YEARS AGO THEN
THE PROCESS FOUR YEARS AGO THEN
VLADIMIR PUTIN EVEN ATTEMPTED TO
VLADIMIR PUTIN EVEN ATTEMPTED TO
DO.
DO.
SANDERS WAS NEVER GOING TO WIN.
SANDERS WAS NEVER GOING TO WIN.
WHEN HE FINALLY DID LOSE,
WHEN HE FINALLY DID LOSE,
SANDERS DID NOT EVEN COMPLAIN
SANDERS DID NOT EVEN COMPLAIN
ABOUT IT.
ABOUT IT.
HE DUTIFULLY SHOWED UP AT THE
HE DUTIFULLY SHOWED UP AT THE
DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION AND
DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION AND
ENDORSED HILLARY CLINTON.
ENDORSED HILLARY CLINTON.
WHEN THE EXTENT OF HER TREACHERY
WHEN THE EXTENT OF HER TREACHERY
BECAME CLEAR IN THE LEAKED
BECAME CLEAR IN THE LEAKED
EMAILS, SANDERS CAMPAIGN FOR
EMAILS, SANDERS CAMPAIGN FOR
HER.
HER.
HILLARY WAS NOT GRATEFUL FOR IT.
HILLARY WAS NOT GRATEFUL FOR IT.
SHE BASHES HIM EXTENSIVELY AND A
SHE BASHES HIM EXTENSIVELY AND A
NEW DOCUMENTARY AND NOT JUST HIS
NEW DOCUMENTARY AND NOT JUST HIS
POLICY BUT PERSONALLY CLAIMING
POLICY BUT PERSONALLY CLAIMING
NOBODY LIKES HIM.
NOBODY LIKES HIM.
SO WHAT DID SANDERS LEARN FROM
SO WHAT DID SANDERS LEARN FROM
ALL OF THIS?
ALL OF THIS?
NOT A SINGLE THING.
NOT A SINGLE THING.
A WEEK AGO THE ENTIRE
A WEEK AGO THE ENTIRE
DEMOCRATIC PARTY COALESCED WITH
DEMOCRATIC PARTY COALESCED WITH
STUNNING SPEED AROUND JOE BIDEN
STUNNING SPEED AROUND JOE BIDEN
AND YOU ARE WATCHING THE RESULTS
AND YOU ARE WATCHING THE RESULTS
TONIGHT.
TONIGHT.
IT IS NOT AS IF THE
IT IS NOT AS IF THE
ESTABLISHMENT PREFERS BIDEN WHO
ESTABLISHMENT PREFERS BIDEN WHO
IS FREELY WORKING TOWARDS IN
IS FREELY WORKING TOWARDS IN
COMPETITIVE HE DID.
COMPETITIVE HE DID.
THEY JUST DESPISED
THEY JUST DESPISED
BERNIE SANDERS AND DESPERATE TO
BERNIE SANDERS AND DESPERATE TO
STOP HIM.
STOP HIM.
THEY WOULD PICK ANYBODY, AND
THEY WOULD PICK ANYBODY, AND
THEY DID AND IT WORKED.
THEY DID AND IT WORKED.
SANDERS GOT CRUSHED ON SUPER
SANDERS GOT CRUSHED ON SUPER
TUESDAY.
TUESDAY.
AND ACTUALLY WHO WANTED TO WIN
AND ACTUALLY WHO WANTED TO WIN
WOULD HAVE PAUSE THE DAY AFTER
WOULD HAVE PAUSE THE DAY AFTER
TO REASSESS HIS CAMPAIGN.
TO REASSESS HIS CAMPAIGN.
FOR SANDERS, THIS WEEK WAS THE
FOR SANDERS, THIS WEEK WAS THE
TIME TO TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT
TIME TO TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT
WHAT IS HAPPENING WHILE WE ARE
WHAT IS HAPPENING WHILE WE ARE
ALL WATCHING.
ALL WATCHING.
THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINATING SYSTEM
THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINATING SYSTEM
IS ROTTEN AND CORRUPT.
IS ROTTEN AND CORRUPT.
AND THOROUGHLY BIDEN IS NOT
AND THOROUGHLY BIDEN IS NOT
CLEAR FOR GOVERNING THE COUNTRY
CLEAR FOR GOVERNING THE COUNTRY
LET ALONE A PRESS CONFERENCE.
LET ALONE A PRESS CONFERENCE.
THE PROCESS IS SHOCKING HIM A
THE PROCESS IS SHOCKING HIM A
FRAUD NOT TO MENTION INCREDIBLY
FRAUD NOT TO MENTION INCREDIBLY
CYNICAL AND RECKLESS.
CYNICAL AND RECKLESS.
THE ESTABLISHMENT DOESN’T CARE
THE ESTABLISHMENT DOESN’T CARE
WHO THE PRESIDENT IS.
WHO THE PRESIDENT IS.
THEY JUST WANT TO MAKE CERTAIN
THEY JUST WANT TO MAKE CERTAIN
IT IS SOMEONE THEY CAN CONTROL
IT IS SOMEONE THEY CAN CONTROL
WHO WON’T RAISE THEIR TAXES.
WHO WON’T RAISE THEIR TAXES.
SANDERS COULD HAVE SETTLED THAT
SANDERS COULD HAVE SETTLED THAT
AND SHOULD HAVE BECAUSE IT IS
AND SHOULD HAVE BECAUSE IT IS
TRUE.
TRUE.
INSTEAD, HE DEFENDED JOE BIDEN.
INSTEAD, HE DEFENDED JOE BIDEN.
WATCH.
WATCH.
>> THE QUESTION OF JOE BIDEN’S
>> THE QUESTION OF JOE BIDEN’S
MENTAL ACUITY IS NOT SOMETHING
MENTAL ACUITY IS NOT SOMETHING
THAT JUST COMES UP ANYWHERE.
THAT JUST COMES UP ANYWHERE.
DEMOCRATS HAVE BROUGHT THIS UP,
DEMOCRATS HAVE BROUGHT THIS UP,
INCLUDING SENATOR CORY BOOKER
INCLUDING SENATOR CORY BOOKER
WHO ENDORSED JOE BIDEN TODAY.
WHO ENDORSED JOE BIDEN TODAY.
>> I WILL NOT GO THAT LEVEL OF
>> I WILL NOT GO THAT LEVEL OF
ATTACKING.
ATTACKING.
JOE AND I, THAT IS FOR PEOPLE TO
JOE AND I, THAT IS FOR PEOPLE TO
DECIDE.
DECIDE.
ALL I CAN SAY, JOE AND I HAVE
ALL I CAN SAY, JOE AND I HAVE
SIGNIFICANT POLITICAL
SIGNIFICANT POLITICAL
DIFFERENCES.
DIFFERENCES.
AND I’M NOT GOING TO MAKE
AND I’M NOT GOING TO MAKE
PERSONAL ATTACKS ON JOE.
PERSONAL ATTACKS ON JOE.
THAT IS NOT WHAT I DO.
THAT IS NOT WHAT I DO.
>> Tucker: OKAY.
>> Tucker: OKAY.
SO ACCORDING TO BERNIE SANDERS,
SO ACCORDING TO BERNIE SANDERS,
WE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT
WE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO TALK ABOUT
THE ONE THING ALL OF US CAN SEE
THE ONE THING ALL OF US CAN SEE
CLEARLY EVERY DAY.
CLEARLY EVERY DAY.
THE DEMOCRATIC FRONT RUNNER IS
THE DEMOCRATIC FRONT RUNNER IS
FAILING.
FAILING.
HE’S NOT CAPABLE OF TAKING THE
HE’S NOT CAPABLE OF TAKING THE
JOB HE’S RUNNING FOR.
JOB HE’S RUNNING FOR.
HIS STAFF IS DESPERATE TO KEEP
HIS STAFF IS DESPERATE TO KEEP
HIM FROM INTERACTING WITH THE
HIM FROM INTERACTING WITH THE
PUBLIC FOR MORE THAN 2 MINUTES.
PUBLIC FOR MORE THAN 2 MINUTES.
BY THE WAY, IT IS NOT A PARTISAN
BY THE WAY, IT IS NOT A PARTISAN
TALKING POINT.
TALKING POINT.
IT IS TRUE.
IT IS TRUE.
IT IS AN OBSERVATION THAT
IT IS AN OBSERVATION THAT
EVERYONE PAYS ATTENTION HAS.
EVERYONE PAYS ATTENTION HAS.
AND IT IS SAD, REALLY SAD.
AND IT IS SAD, REALLY SAD.
IT IS DAMAGING SINCERELY.
IT IS DAMAGING SINCERELY.
BUT IN RESPONSE A ANY OF THE
BUT IN RESPONSE A ANY OF THE
SPIRIT SHUT UP AND RAPIDLY
SPIRIT SHUT UP AND RAPIDLY
DECLINING COMMUNICATION SKILLS
DECLINING COMMUNICATION SKILLS
IS A "PERSONAL ATTACK."
IS A "PERSONAL ATTACK."
IT IS PRETTY OBVIOUS SANDERS
IT IS PRETTY OBVIOUS SANDERS
DOESN’T WANT TO WIN IS A MAN WHO
DOESN’T WANT TO WIN IS A MAN WHO
THINKS IT’S MORE NOBLE TO FAIL
THINKS IT’S MORE NOBLE TO FAIL
THEM TO SUCCEED.
THEM TO SUCCEED.
YOU WERE WATCHING A PROFESSIONAL
YOU WERE WATCHING A PROFESSIONAL
LOSER.
LOSER.
SANDERS IS ALL BUT ADMITTING
SANDERS IS ALL BUT ADMITTING
THAT NOW AND ALREADY PROMISED TO
THAT NOW AND ALREADY PROMISED TO
BACK BIDEN IF BIDEN LEADS THE
BACK BIDEN IF BIDEN LEADS THE
NOMINATION.
NOMINATION.
AND HE WILL NOT CONTEST THE
AND HE WILL NOT CONTEST THE
CONVENTION IF BIDEN FALLS SHORT
CONVENTION IF BIDEN FALLS SHORT
OF A DELICATE MAJORITY, WATCH.
OF A DELICATE MAJORITY, WATCH.
>> AT THE END OF THE DAY IT
>> AT THE END OF THE DAY IT
TURNS OUT VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN
TURNS OUT VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN
WILL HAVE MORE DELEGATES THAN
WILL HAVE MORE DELEGATES THAN
YOU DO HEADING INTO THE
YOU DO HEADING INTO THE
CONVENTION, WOULD YOU DROP OUT?
CONVENTION, WOULD YOU DROP OUT?
>> HE WILL WIN.
>> HE WILL WIN.
WE WILL RUN AND I SUSPECT WE
WE WILL RUN AND I SUSPECT WE
WILL RUN THROUGH THE PROCESS AND
WILL RUN THROUGH THE PROCESS AND
PEOPLE HAVE A RIGHT TO VOTE.
PEOPLE HAVE A RIGHT TO VOTE.
BUT IF BIDEN HAS DEMENTIA --
BUT IF BIDEN HAS DEMENTIA --
>> THAT IS TRUE WHETHER OR NOT
>> THAT IS TRUE WHETHER OR NOT
HE HAS THE MAJORITY OR
HE HAS THE MAJORITY OR
PLURALITY?
PLURALITY?
>> ABSOLUTELY.
>> ABSOLUTELY.
>> Tucker: OH, ABSOLUTELY SAYS
>> Tucker: OH, ABSOLUTELY SAYS
BERNIE SANDERS, ABSOLUTELY.
BERNIE SANDERS, ABSOLUTELY.
PATHETIC, ACTUALLY.
PATHETIC, ACTUALLY.
REAL REVOLUTIONARIES GO TO THE
REAL REVOLUTIONARIES GO TO THE
WALL FOR WHAT THEY BELIEVE.
WALL FOR WHAT THEY BELIEVE.
BERNIE SANDERS WON’T EVEN GO TO
BERNIE SANDERS WON’T EVEN GO TO
THE CONVENTION.
THE CONVENTION.
BECAUSE THAT IS WHO
BECAUSE THAT IS WHO
BERNIE SANDERS IS AND THAT’S WHO
BERNIE SANDERS IS AND THAT’S WHO
HE HAS ALWAYS BEEN.
HE HAS ALWAYS BEEN.
BACK IN 2015 AT A RALLY IN
BACK IN 2015 AT A RALLY IN
SEATTLE, TWO DEMONSTRATORS TOOK
SEATTLE, TWO DEMONSTRATORS TOOK
THE MIC FROM SANDERS WHILE HE
THE MIC FROM SANDERS WHILE HE
WAS TRYING TO SPEAK.
WAS TRYING TO SPEAK.
RATHER THAN TAKE BACK HIS OWN
RATHER THAN TAKE BACK HIS OWN
PODIUM, SANDERS TOOK A SIDE BY A
PODIUM, SANDERS TOOK A SIDE BY A
SCOLDED CHILD AND CALLED UP THE
SCOLDED CHILD AND CALLED UP THE
EVENT ALTOGETHER WITHOUT EVEN
EVENT ALTOGETHER WITHOUT EVEN
FINISHING HIS SPEECH.
FINISHING HIS SPEECH.
IMAGINE DOING THAT YOURSELF.
IMAGINE DOING THAT YOURSELF.
IMAGINE HOW MUCH SELF LOATHING
IMAGINE HOW MUCH SELF LOATHING
YOU WOULD HAVE.
YOU WOULD HAVE.
WOULD YOUR KIDS LOOK YOU IN THE
WOULD YOUR KIDS LOOK YOU IN THE
FACE?
FACE?
PROBABLY NOT.
PROBABLY NOT.
BUT HE KEPT DOING IT.
BUT HE KEPT DOING IT.
LESS THAN TWO MONTHS AGO SANDERS
LESS THAN TWO MONTHS AGO SANDERS
SUPPORTERS DID WHAT HE WOULDN’T
SUPPORTERS DID WHAT HE WOULDN’T
DO, TOLD THE TRUTH ABOUT
DO, TOLD THE TRUTH ABOUT
JOE BIDEN.
JOE BIDEN.
SHE CALLED HIM CORRUPT AND SHE
SHE CALLED HIM CORRUPT AND SHE
DID A POOR REASON.
DID A POOR REASON.
FOR DECADES A PAID LACKEY OF THE
FOR DECADES A PAID LACKEY OF THE
CREDIT CARD COMPANIES.
CREDIT CARD COMPANIES.
BUT SANDERS WOULDN’T PLAY ALONG.
BUT SANDERS WOULDN’T PLAY ALONG.
HE APOLOGIZED FOR WHAT HIS
HE APOLOGIZED FOR WHAT HIS
SURROGATE SAID AND CLAIMED
SURROGATE SAID AND CLAIMED
JOE BIDEN WAS ETHICALLY PURE
JOE BIDEN WAS ETHICALLY PURE
APPEARED SANDERS ATTACKED HIS
APPEARED SANDERS ATTACKED HIS
OWN SURROGATE FOR TELLING THE
OWN SURROGATE FOR TELLING THE
TRUTH.
TRUTH.
SO WHAT DID SANDERS GET IN
SO WHAT DID SANDERS GET IN
RETURN FOR DOING THAT?
RETURN FOR DOING THAT?
MORE ATTACKS AND OF COURSE YOU
MORE ATTACKS AND OF COURSE YOU
CAN GUESS IT, THEY CONTINUED TO
CAN GUESS IT, THEY CONTINUED TO
DENOUNCE HIM IN SUPPORTERS AS
DENOUNCE HIM IN SUPPORTERS AS
SEXIST, BULLIES, LOSERS AND THEY
SEXIST, BULLIES, LOSERS AND THEY
ARE STILL DOING IT TONIGHT AND
ARE STILL DOING IT TONIGHT AND
THEY WILL KEEP IT UP UNTIL
THEY WILL KEEP IT UP UNTIL
THAT -- UNTO THE GENERATIONS.
THAT -- UNTO THE GENERATIONS.
PERSONAL ATTACKS IS WHAT THEY DO
PERSONAL ATTACKS IS WHAT THEY DO
BEST.
BEST.
WHERE IS BERNIE IN THIS?
WHERE IS BERNIE IN THIS?
SECRETLY ENJOYING THIS AND
SECRETLY ENJOYING THIS AND
LOSING AND HE IS IDEOLOGICALLY
