

Life Reality

Published by Jean-Nichol Dufour at Smashwords

Copyright 2011-2018 Jean-Nichol Dufour

Sunrise edition

TABLE OF CONTENT

DESTINY DREAMS

11-LIFE REALITY

1/8

2/8

3/8

4/8

5/8

6/8

7/8

First things first

This is part 7 of a suite forming the book "A Flower To Life". I decided to make it available that way because it is too long or too big for most book sites on the net. I will eventually try to publish as paperback, again, but for now it seems it's not the style literary agents want to see, it's too long, too big, very bad english, not fitting their free market or what they like to read; I never got a criticism about content. In fact, after trying for a year I'm sure nobody in the publishing industry ever read it. Now that you know how bad it is since connoisseurs judged it so while complaining they get nothing special to read, I'll talk about the killing point; I want free digital copies available to anybody, and that is impossible, even if I let the publisher have all the profits they can manage to gain from selling it as paperback (and digital too). So I separated the book as a suite for free distribution on Smashwords, and nobody except me touches the text. I know literary agents are a bit right about my "very bad english", but it's part of their job to see potential and help, not push people to self-publishing, which it's sure not something I can afford. For now I don't take it too badly since my work is about starting a new reality from scratch, so I must cover a vast range of hard philosophical, spiritual, personal, psychological, political and fundamental universal matrix subjects, and gaining all round competence with all that will require lots of time and quite a few updates to get right, particularly with the casual style I have chosen. While some, I wonder who, will argue about my style, I believe I have chosen the fastest and best route to get my arguments read by a maximum of people, I want my work as the adventure of revolted person fighting hell in a realist way. As for the why I want an independent source free, it is because I know this will be a unique and rare artefact, and I don't want anybody to take control of it after I'm dead. I want a place where my profile and my work can remain available after my death in its integrity of form, even if a transfer of platform becomes necessary. I accept that people make any variation of it if it's not for bad intents or self-interests, but the original must remain integral. And one last thing, up to the flower edition, I swear upon all the entities I believe in that all my work is free of external influence that I know of (maybe except gods); it is all the invention, imagination and deductions of someone who was curious and interested in science when young, had to deal with religious resentment, did a bit of military, learned a bit of technology, discovered his inadequacy, got himself a spirituality, and finally a nice mentality, after losing all sociability.... All that has arisen from forming my opinions as I experienced reality and kept a general interest on everything, easily available to anybody, but TV, and I still manage not to read the bible, nothing on the mind, no book on psychology or philosophy in my library that don't exist, in my home that don't exist, and internet searches may be limited to a few details.

DESTINY DREAMS

I did this dream once under a different form around 22, to know my destiny I like to think. It was a single dream so I kind of forgot it until 32 when it revealed itself as something unique that made me question my sanity. The explanation was a bit esoteric so that limited my enthusiasm in writing about it, but I still like the particularity, and as my vision of things enlarged, so did the complexity of the view of dreams to explain and I guess now it makes sense. I decided my old dream was a premonition of finding my destiny, and the reconstruction of it, piece by piece, over something like10 years, is my struggle in reality to attain it. That is so because it seems related to my will of writing. It is long and the last time I went there it felt like it went on for hours, so now I had to question if in fact I was not imagining myself a dream; for me dreaming would be like, ok, let's have fun! And it works, because I ditched this reality, and the way I imagine stories before going to sleep, since the particularity about these stories is that I don't profit, because it's never worth it, so I'm like a guide or a victim or a weirdo, that people meet and follow, and they end-up discovering wonders, and to me it's the empathic feeling that's important, this feeling of beyond understanding that can only reflect good, and that's what I do in reality too by writing, in all kind of ways already, but this chapter and the 2 next are the culmination; you'll have followed my adventure, seen all kind of things that left you speechless, felt bad felt good, we had fun too, while understanding many profound things, that were just there within grasp, and now we debark in town, here is where you realize it was not just pretty words, you were right to be a little scared because here is reality, here is where you cry of desire. Just continue along, you have come to know how I think, you have come to trust my lead, because everything make sense with me, and it will be my pleasure to make you understand how everything works, reward you for tagging along. You can see it as the frustrated father in me at beyond level too.

That added to being an amateur of games, so my soul (unconscious self-deduction of how to deal with me through dreams, like I don't have enough of my other brain for troubles...), play a game on me, trick me, because it know how I am, which is different so different dreams, more fun an cool and full of meaning, for me, not for you, you're not different like me and even then it's probably unique and related to the needs of the job and my destiny. So it mean my mind would prepare itself a terrain of adventure so I eventually have to question where it's from. It's how you do premonition dreams I would guess, like you unconsciously know something, and your dreams machine will let you know what it is if the room is available, or depending on the presence of reality in your preoccupations. So that would mean that if you really believe in something because it makes lots of sense, then you could make dreams that reflect where your reasoning will lead you, with elements you can recognize and whatever it finds in memory that got itself related to all the subject at hand. The building blocks to form as much the graphical image as the emotional one. So the premonition is related to the integrity of the belief, and its form can vary with interpretation; I'm preparing my dreams in advance, from bits of other intense dreams, and now it's all interrelated dreams and I go nuts.

It was kind of a welcome back party, but not really a party. It was emotive for me to find back the place (in the dream) and realize (in the dream) that I often dreamed of it without noticing. I often failed to continue because of a lack of dreaming time, or natural obstacles I couldn't go over which would represent a fallacy in my mind, which frustrated me, and so I memorized the whole terrain that my tricky mind would use to have fun with me, making me wait there for some rare occurrence to happen that will make the dream continue. If not, then you waste your time poking around until you're out of dreaming time, since my mind seems to think that amounts to an actual concept that makes sense, yet, this effect of turning in circles in dreams is not a new phenomena to me, since it seems I often bug around stuff in dreams...

I don't write much details about my dreams until I recognize a repetitive or puzzle one. I don't sleep with paper and pen, but when I know I made a good one I may take the time to write about it, illegibly, on an envelope probably. Just to give myself clues for a later description which I rarely do, so the piece of paper ends-up in a drawer and I forget about it. When I decided to write about my dreams, I was surprised of what I found and the surprise was all the greater when I discovered my ability to remember most of them very well from the small description. But still just write about those I think fit well in the book, or if they are exceptional. The repetitive or puzzle dreams kind are a rare occurrence besides the many dreams I do, which are long and complex and I seem to like detective work with lots of people and strange situations. If I wake up and immediately go back to sleep, I can make two dreams in a row or even jump back in the last one, and I find it a bit of a deception that I gain consciousness of only a fraction of them. If I'm to take those I have consciousness of (not necessarily remembering) as an example, then what I'm missing should be quite a fantasy show, because, why not fantasy? It's sexy...

I think that each time I made a tentative at seriously writing I dreamt a variation of this dream, but that may just be an impression. Beginning at 27 I made almost a serious tentative a year to start writing, blocked by my incompetence, and I would think I made an equivalent number of these dreams, where I got blocked by a fantastic natural obstacle. That may not sound credible, but when the "bic" version was well underway on paper, it is when the dream was directly and evidently revealed as a whole and I was permitted to sit down and witness the process of my crossing of the impassable obstacle into more flabbergasting revelations and overwhelming emotions. This dream actually gave me added motivation to write this book to the end, and I switched right away to the final (first) computer version, most of my time spent to the task to the point of developing a tendonitis or something in the left biceps from typing with one finger. But I'm becoming good at this, almost impressive.

I will intermix all the dreams about this place into one as there is not much to be said about the individual parts except to describe points of interest and my "lion in a cage" boring struggle to pass the impassable obstacle. I made a drawing of the place for fun (Destiny dream). Except for some points of interest, the whole place is covered by a thick and flourishing coniferous forest. I would start a dream at some place and add to the map as I adventure around, crossing places from other dreams.

I would start in an apartment with friends in the city, preparing for a fishing trip. Then we'd be in a thick forest climbing mountain, a few friends turning around. Then the same would happen as I descend the mountain, then I would be fishing in a river with only one friend, then walking against the current while fishing until I notice that the décor is always the same like the earth under my feet is an infinite ball and the upriver I see is another dimension. I would walk infinitively toward the unreachable until I wake up.

In another dream I would start in the forest walking no end completely lost until I would wake up.

In another one I would be in a big building with machinery doing things. Then I would find myself walking on a giant cranium descending it, then I would be walking the bottom of a river with only a small trickle in it until I hit the fantastic dam, to finally end-up wasting my time trying to go over it.

Or I'd start as a child in my parent's home, they would tell me to never go upriver but I would find myself going anyway, discovering a dry river, following it. After some time I'd turn around to go back home scared, then I'd be going upriver curious, turning back, a few times, until I find myself so far away from home that I would abandon turning around to continue walking no end.

Even if they look related at this point, I didn't associate these dreams until the most recent one which started with a sight of the city, like I was floating in the middle of the lake.

I can't keep from feeling that I know this place, as I enter the chalet on the island. There's nothing in it except a balancing chair in a veranda facing east from where I can see everything; every point of interest of the land. I sit down and look around feeling relaxed. I have a flashback of an empty river, the dam, the big building at the back of the cranium top, I recognize it all and the whole place takes the form of an aerial photography. Then I'd be zooming on the top of the cranium, water is flowing over it, lots of water, torrents of water, water everywhere, clear scintillating water, it's sunny, I'm happy, something good is going on.

Suddenly I'm behind the dam standing on a small wooden barrel just big enough to stand-on naturally without effort and without movement. I'm slowly advancing counter current, on a calm, not large, but very deep looking river blackened in shades. There is someone not far from me in the same situation. I can go where I want on the barrel, I can control it, it is just slow. I rejoin with the other man before I stop at the camp. I jump from the barrel and enter the place while the other man follows me.

I know this place from another dream, I'm sure of this, so I always knew, as I seem to know exactly how to behave myself here. There is an open 200g bag of nature chip on the counter, I eat a few ones then I pass it to the other man, he does the same before giving it back to me. I pitch it back on the table, I look around, all kind of stuff but nothing of interest. I'm attracted to a few firefighter dresses hanging around, but they seem of no use to me. I go to the bathroom; it is small with a big wardrobe in front of the toilet, I open the wardrobe but nothing, and i'm about to leave when I quickly go back to the bathroom and violently throw the wardrobe down on the toilet. Behind it there is a 2 feet crude cache on the wall near the floor containing a small can of salmon with a bottle of mixed salt and paper; I take both and say satisfyingly "now we have food man!" I get out of the bathroom and I notice a few different hats hanging, I take one; it is a big sun hat, it looks womanly, and then the other man says "if you want the hat you'll have to cut a part around it." I put it back where it was, get out of the camp while noticing the black 4x4 alongside it, not caring about the sight while still feeling it related to me. I see our barrels quite far away and I say "strange we didn't attach them." We jump back on them and get going.

After a short while I realize the other man is not with me anymore. I continue alone, noticing how high both cliff faces are rising, that makes the place quite dark and this will worsen for the rest of the dream. As I advance I extend my right arm like I'm a captain at the prow of a ship and someone put in it a wooden beam like a telephone pole cut 1/3 length with a 2 meters triangular sail at the top; it is a black man passing by who gave it to me. While he continues on at twice my speed without a sail, I ask him, talking about the river "where does it leads?" he answers "around" and he continue on until I lose sight of him.

Then I'm with some family doing tourism, advancing around, not talking, we are approaching two warriors and they unsheathe their silver sabers. I turn around realizing that I've been here before and that to go through I need a better mean of transportation, but I don't remember what and what is beyond either, even if I know I've been through this place long ago (in the complete "premonition" dream I did at 22, but this takes a strange form when you get it from within a dream, you just feel while doing your things, but like another man made the old dreams, but maybe it's just because I'm really not the same man at 32 than I was at 22, and it would explain the intensity of all my feelings within this particular dream, since it interrelates many other dreams and got the longest reach in my past). Apart from the 2 guards, I see some people walking in the water on long stilts but I seems to know that this is not the way through.

I go meet the old man receptionist nearby, I don't know who he is but I seems to know him well. I don't know why but we both start crying like babies, and I'm still too far to see him well, I just feel that man, and this is an emotive moment. Once in front of him I slowly place one cent in his small hand, he give me back one cent, I give it back, he eats it, and give back one 10 cents between two 1 cents I think, maybe a 5 cents instead or added. That's what I end-up with and I go to the only place I can sit down; the nearby relaxation corner full of treasures. While going there I continue hesitantly as all kinds of emotions fight inside me from all kind of unknown sources. I know some big shocking revelation will come soon. The "waiting" corner is made out of fantastic jewels hanging around, the walls are made of gold and silver with motives and diamonds and all kind of jewels of all colors the size of fists and arms are glittering around an invisible chair over water. All this dream is on water, there is no floor anywhere. I sit down in the invisible chair totally oblivious to the richness around me while my family is quite flabbergasted though...Something is nagging me.

A slip of paper appears in my hands with something written on it in gold forged lettering over a silver under-lettering. I don't have time to read what is written as the sleeping me is waking up from the disturbance. I turn over the piece of paper instead and I see about 10 three letters codes written on the back. By looking at those codes I know without doubt that I invented them; they are signatures. I wake up.

My theory is that the old man is a "destiny" pointer, or a score keeper. Or maybe someone I know that I shouldn't doing a joke on me, you take the skin you want, I do it in another dream, and people do it with me too, women, receptionists.

Maybe one of the reasons for sleep and dreams is certify the truth of our imagination and memory, giving hints of how we can become, of what are our present hurdles, and if dreams can point to things, sometimes to internal problems, or life's problems. Who? What? The processes of your unconscious, life, since there are not 2 of you, an unconscious one and a conscious one, No, it's not how it works, you're a whole tree, but the tree communicates with the soil, for the tree to exist it needs to connect, why? Eh, to its necessity to exist? Seeds think? Who does the thinking? How big would that be, to build a decoding and translation machine to assimilate and react to the details of the information that circulates through my senses in reality? How much bigger would it need to be to decode and translate the same thing if I mix imagination in everything? No scientist ever found the decoder...

You may control your imagination, but this capacity is very much reduced in sleep, and maybe some form of data arrangements are only possible through sleep, when your input from reality is minimal and won't interfere an already vague interpretation of reality. So no sense boundaries, and since your speech and thinking engines are off, then any communication is limited to take the form of imaginary videos or pictures having the appropriate weight or form of feelings, the same kind of associations of imaginary images with feelings, but reverse, as a way to better identify where there's a bug. You're supposed to do it when you're up and running too, and it's called taking care of your language and mind, and I would guess minimize PMBBD (Propaganda, Manipulation, Bullshit, Brainwash, Disinformation) would help, and conflicting definitions too...

So, to continue this science of dream signification, the association strength is, in a lot of instance, proportional to the feeling strength of the words in the message, and those words may not be words, they may be feelings too, but everything is dependent from memory. The main factors influencing memory strength are repetition and feelings, and those are always translated as language and image, so the more integrity in language, the more significative or truer the dreams.

All in all, yes, dreams could represent a pressure from life, dreaming may be one of the most complex developing modifier of all; a sensible connection involving both extensions of the UI. An independent one at that, to add to the troubles, it would be based on feelings strength associated to imaginary images related to reality, and the work would be extraordinary, involving millions of years of dreaming time, associating all kind of still not fully developed sensitivities to things. The downside is that many would end-up crazy or sick in the head along its development too, which is often the price of evolution. Maybe someday we'll fall asleep to live adventures for hours in dreams while learning tons of useful things, and you'll wake-up remembering your dreams a lot better, like another life where you are the hero, or the loser, but you don't have to tell others, they're your personal worlds. But I can guess evil wouldn't like such a concept, so maybe we'll have to make a good reality first, while not forgetting that all high consciousness species will cherish independence, but in my view we are all associated, so we'll find greater happiness by listening to each other and helping each others.

One thing's for sure, I learn a lot from dreaming, even this book wouldn't exist as a lot of my philosophy started in dreams. For now I dream of places and visit these back through my life. So while I was sleeping, I don't know how, but someone, surely me for my own entertainment, invented lands, and now I sometimes enter back these lands like a surprise; they are like dimensional lands, they show a different dimension to things, imagination and creativity out of reality limitations, I want my dreams longer and more vivid, I want them to talk to me. Got to be patient? Got to be careful? I know, I know, and more different lands to visit too, and me not take drug anymore, I promise.

As for the old man of the dream, for now let's say he's someone important who took a receptionist job; he passes messages, certifies authenticity of dreams and takes note of fulfilled quests. His form and actions may be my way of seeing him but you're not supposed to meet his equivalent, unless "he" (your "deep unconscious") thinks you're really into something concerning your best use (or something you really want, but I'm talking about this specific dream). Then he may appear in one of your dreams to encourage you and you may never know you met him. Though you have more chances to meet something like him if you are advancing well in your destiny, or proportionally to the importance of it. Meaning you are doing what you were supposed to be doing in life and "he" (your deep unconscious) want you to keep-on on the same track. If you're going in the pointed direction, meeting your destiny, then your dreams may contain clues reflected from your actions in reality and without noticing it, you'll send, to your version of the man, hints that you're on the right track.

Another destiny connection exists in relation to what you can attain versus your wishes, the larger the divergence the less significative the dream, but when you make such a dream as I'm describing then it got to reflect something important. I could say the importance and sense of the dream is proportional to the importance of what you think you're doing in reality, small or normal dreams can arise from anything, but dreams like this one arise from something more profound, helped by a different view of reality while being disconnected by this reality's matters, because I just know it's shit, I d'n't even care because I know why, I'll explain eventually. The principle is that you wouldn't ask anybody to make such a dream, whatever the great destiny of the guy.

Destiny has a very large meaning, it's a magic word like love... Destiny cannot be changed as it conflict the definition of destiny itself, meaning that, contrary to the suggestion that destiny is a material thing you can change (or an esoteric spell), destiny is bestowed upon creation; if you could say "here's your new destiny" then you could say to an old man on the verge of dying that his new destiny is to lay down and do nothing as it is the best he can do with his life for now, which would eliminate the need for the destiny concept itself since you're better saying "The best you can do for now is to lay down and do nothing", and next, what's the need for destiny if you change it continually on the spot depending on your mood or any external factor? Your destiny is something that starts at birth (you can add a few years) and successfully living it or not implies that you first have to live your life to know, even if the best you'll get are hints. As for external factors, they are part of the deal; you can't say your destiny is to become an athlete if you're living in a void, you must know sports infrastructures exist in reality to say it, and this same reality got drunk drivers in it that could make you paraplegic, it's part of the deal, when you were born you still had everything to become an athlete, you were destined to be an athlete, but the drunk driver crushed your destiny. And no the drunk driver was not destined to crush you, unless it was the best he could do with his life when he was born...You need an idea of the reality you live in to talk about destiny, adults may see it in you and tell you, if they got adequate judgment, but your best chance is competent parenthood and a reality that won't force your path on the matter, then around adolescence it will come naturally, the path you'll chose should be in harmony with your destiny. The same applies to the tendency many people have to turn the definition upside down by taking the end result to say a matter of fact stupid sentence like "he was destined to a wheelchair". Why would you need destiny if you could say to anybody he's doing things because he was destined to do it? But we're in a free country, and people got enough troubles watching T.V. as long as you're polite in public and got good grammar when writing it...

Almost doing your destiny or doing something that is in the same vein gives almost the full effect of it. After you are in "harmony" with your destiny, or you attain your destiny, you may say that you are on vacation for the rest of your life as long as you continue living inside the ways that brought you to your destiny. Maybe destiny is different for women too, and both will be better served if they think in function of association and complementarity (not equality and competition), except for fairness, to free equality as a goal from the relation; man=woman=false and it will always stay that way whatever the equality revolution, or the confusion revolution, unless you want to make gay world or something, but for that you'd need to first genetically engineer the style to bear babies, not a small feat. Fairness is one thing, equality another, even if I understand the undermeaning, the problem is that fairness will never succeed in this reality since it is meant to do the contrary. But in another reality that just systhemise fairness instead, you wouldn't have women in an unfair situation, and you wouldn't talk about that weird sex equality vision you're having...

Past around 25 it is almost too late to have a chance at finding your destiny, but this values may somewhat change with evolution. Furthermore, it may be possible that living from the laws of an ego reality, wathever it is the "natural" way or not, invalidates the power of destiny in most people who work for it since profiteers put pressure for productivity or adjust destiny, super fast in life, far before you know what you really need or want. Maybe you were born with exceptional capacities that would make you a master in an electronic specialty, it is where you'd find your greatest pride, harmony too, etc, supposing the salary is fair. But sorry, the market is full, we need entertainment, you can still choose electronics (supposing your destiny survived your parent's wishes for your future; if they feed you MC Do by the dozen daily, you sure lost your destiny if it was to become an athlete. The same for TV, I would say 70% of all destinies are obscured to inexistence by TV) but I'm the expert here and the future is in entertainment and you're good with a guitar, you'll see, and girls are guitar crazy, and it may even lead you to fame! Then you'll go practice guitar, and soon discover that's what you want to fucking do! The skill you want to develop the most, you'll even get an expensive guitar for Christmas for some encouragement! But now your destiny is dead! Electronics is number 17 in what you can become good at, and even if you suddenly switched to it, you still lost much potential, you won't be as proud as you won't become as good, depression and death when your happiness will be less too. But you play guitar, but since music was not your best facet you stayed stuck with a cheap band and never became famous, even if yes, girls like guitars, are you happy? You think so, sex, drugs, good money, but you'll never know how different your life could have been if you had chosen an electronic related career. And now that you fully developed your mind along the music band, if I dropped you back in your destiny you wouldn't appreciate it, you would make a depression and kill your whole family. I know my example is not entirely right, a career counselor is very unlikely to suggest playing guitar as a career.

To go back to my things, I'll say you can see a will to do something there too, the dream is not an imposed destiny notion, it's a vague self-reflection of possibilities and will; you got the potential and the will, you make the dreams. But it depends if you too is on a path that makes you believe you got the potential, or if your unconscious believes it very strongly alone; you can have the potential to make a massacre soon too, you may believe you will. Furthermore, things can easily get twisted when you try to interpret the kit, and it is easy to have an exaggerated vision of yourself, which may lead you to exaggerate the weight on your shoulders, and make a depression and kill 20 co-workers.

Or the contrary; you can have a hundred different dreams about one thing that you'll either add up to make it a too big quest, or you'll interpret the hundred dreams differently, running in a hundred directions exhausting yourself to death; and make a depression and crush 30 people with your truck, you got to be careful with dreams, they are not reality, they are encouragements to look into something, or to continue on a path, or to stop it, things like that, but I'm generalizing a bit.

Still, dreams are full of meanings, and knowledge, you can modify your life from them, but they are not meant to point precisely to a path, they are more like suggestions, you don't wake up every morning changing everything because you had a dream, tell the world you had a dream and because of it things will change, you didn't need the dream to do the action, but it may still influence your actions, you decide, but playing guitar is totally an option too. You may deduct yourself a mission from some dreams, I do, but they are never an argument, more like an unconscious, imaginary way of one's spiritual view of himself, sometimes.

Now, for a lot of people, particularly psy and scientists, destiny is a hard to accept concept, why? What's the problem? As they work for money, or fame, or survival, they are no different than most people, with the same needs and problems in reality, the criteria of their job is just different, and so they are as susceptible to PMBBD as anybody else, even if most boast they are atheists in the name of their job that encourages them to keep the no brainer path from youth, since everybody starts an atheist...But they have the same questions as everybody else who care, the same unknowns, the same ignorance, maybe formulated differently. They have the same problem everybody have, they got work to do, yoga, they got entertainment and socialization and jogging to do, no time for spiritual ghosts, that's last, so let's endorse the religion of the place, or maybe make a quick run through the most publicized. We shouldn't limit our view to what can be proven I say, to keep our mind more open, not close it to other valid possibilities.

Then there is the fact that such notions like destiny (like reality, dimension, karma, reincarnation, etc...) can be hard to accept for many because the signification changed through time have been twisted to conflicting meaning, and people were not as encouraged to fight PMBBD with competence, they prefer to discard instead . We're talking reaction to mass PMBBD here, like love; a lot of people will discard love as bullshit instead of trying to just stick to the logic of it, for all kind of wrong reasons, makes sense or not, because they can't fit the definition and they prefer its destruction of it even if it changes nothing to their life, just to make the reality of love so that someday they'll be right in their competition. The same for god; if religion messed him up, then a lot of people will dump the whole god idea instead of trying to find a satisfactory vision, because you know, religions are supposed to be experts on the matter, they got a history of imposing themselves with all their means, so you can bet any other vision can only be wrong, not worth the time.

Some people may rebel against bullshit or manipulation, but since they can't find the time to decompose everything, or the skill was not developed to become efficient, then they're as well go for a straight simple solution of associating bullshit to destruction; if you meet a word or principle that is fundamentally flawed in whatever definition, you call it bullshit and forget about it, that's all you need to do, and when someone will ask you what you think of destiny you'll answer: bullshit! But is it? Do you know all the visions of it? Are they all bullshit? I say the definition I gave about destiny makes sense, and I'm sure most people know it, so why did it become bullshit for many people? Because it was twisted at all sauces by manipulators.

Destiny makes life more interesting and encourages people to find their "best" ways. I see nothing negative in having a vision of destiny, just a vision, you don't have to go nuts about it, and run about creating algorithms of destinies, mmm, the ship of destiny...You may still dump all this destiny stuff if you want; I already told you this book is how I like life, my painting of life. Personally, if the idea makes sense and can be associated in a multitude of ways globally in the complex web of my consciousness non conflictingly, then I go right on ahead with it, particularly if the notion expresses itself repetitively without my will for it. To me it's just a fact that everybody is best at something from birth and that following this path will most likely bring someone to happiness; maybe not, but we don't know for now.

This is what I understood when the old man gave me the list of codes; they were codes I created and used in other dreams, yes sir, when I saw these codes, made of personal meanings like initials, images of old dreams flashed through my mind. I remembered composing one of them on a telephone getting no answer; I remembered scratching one of them on the bark of a tree, on a piece of paper, on a check, on the skin of a woman, etc. And I actually remembered some of these dreams quite well. I just never noticed or remembered writing the codes until this visit to the old man. As for what is beyond the guards, I didn't go there in this dream, but I do seem to recall from the initial dream I made at 22, that there is a skeleton king on a throne there.

I will end this by saying that now I make dreams with 4 number codes in them, instead of the 3 letter ones, and they are followed by a long personal signification number that's always the same; those numbers are made evident enough that I can note them when I wake up. Are they lottery numbers? We'll see...

Back to page

THE SEED PART 1

************

LIFE REALITY

The main idea behind this reality is to get higher life moving in the galaxy as the official story is that never did an extraterrestrial set foot on the planet or communicated, even if it is an evident jewel, even if those same officials want us to believe in "god". You cannot be uninterested by such a planet is what I say, so if they haven't visited yet, or shown themselves, or communicated, whatever speed limits, it means either they don't want or they can't. As long as it is the case we are the only and ultimate life extrapolation; we are alone until we meet someone and we are responsible for life which can't escape dust to dust without us. And since we have no idea of what is life elsewhere, or how advanced it is, or how frequent, then all life that can be associated to us is our absolute priority. As to the extent of the possibilities we must defend, if we are to do our best, then we must consider that life may fail alongside us in this system, maybe even the galaxy. Our failure or success is entirely dependent from our attitude, which we can change, yes, we're that much important and precious; you can have lots of fun, waste tons of time, but you better first pass the step of making life secure. Presently, we don't much care for it, particularly city people, we want it submitted, exploited, domesticated, or in zoos; and the only help we give it is out of fear for our own short (life) term ego survival. We must guarantee life survival, including us, on this planet forever (millions of years) and we must put our energy toward colonizing another planet or moon.

But before such enterprises we got to learn to live better and to respect the greatest creation of the universe we know of; our minds. We will have to stop thinking we are social animals with a big brain; we have to go far beyond that to have the right to say we are minimally respectful, and successful. For these reasons and more, like the fact that the first city will be built hybridized from life examples (the brain, consciousness, unconsciousness, nervous system, heart, blood, circulation system, digestive system etc, etc.), and the way I see the birthing of it from mother earth and father reality, I will baptize the new reality as a life reality, and so, humanity will give life to a new reality.

Then we will give a flower to life because we like it, so from the sky our most prominent visual feature will take the form of a flower, it will be our starting point, a start like we'll experience someday on another planet; we are a step up in life evolution, we don't start from Adam and eve no more, or more appropriately from a cell at the bottom of the ocean, no, we land a million people on a planet, build a base (city), in big part for protection, we plug the computers for an already functioning good systematization of means and let's go.

Next, if we want an imaginary form to describe the structure of the new reality, it will be wheel powered as a reflection of the moving dynamism of the reality in many facets. There is the control for ego pyramidal reality with urban expanses, now there will be a life wheel reality, with flower cities (geometrical) as more appropriate to our goals than vast cities.

From now on I'll try to emphasizes calling our present state as a father reality instead, as an entity that wants to try birthing a new reality. Father was ego because he started without an education, but in the end, he cleaned some space for a more appropriate way and "things" went well... If not, then go to hell, you are too ego to tolerate something different, you want nobody to become better, then die alone. So the tentative principle is simple; when I'm writing about this reality while no other reality exists, it is a bad ego reality since it is alone and compete everything to elimination to stay alone, while knowing it had no choice to be based on ego competition and profiting as a travesty of survival since it has always been alone on earth, or it did everything to. When I write supposing it has sowed, or will, the seed of another reality, then I'll be less satirist about it, but it will take some time to form a trusting relationship, it may as well start laughing and it stop helping, or run away, or become a baby killer, dumping the last of its responsibility, if you want to see it as someone that raped mother earth and gave birth by accident...

For now, I know some would be too happy to demolish everything right away by saying it's socialism or communism, or democracy, or capitalism, but another reality is different in everything and may not even contains a politicians, while still taking big decisions, no bankers, while still managing tremendously big budgets, the fundamental ideal is something else, that's why it's another reality, but in your words you could simplify the shit out of it by saying it's capitalism on top of socialism, but since it's me that decide, then it's the power of both at their best, allright? Everybody is happy? I'm an evil communist, and I'm an evil capitalist, that why I have 0 friends.

As I write about the basic idea of the new reality, I will not skip every opportunity to continue building the defense made of spikes and trigger traps for it, that would be quite irresponsible in hell, and it is my opinion that good intentioned people will appreciate my remarks.

Now, the name of some of those under-products systems of the ego-gods ideal are perverted; the names had good associations, but they have been used by politicians to PMBBD the population into believing things will be done for them while they worsened the class separation and built still bigger tanks to store people's life energy (means), while their justifications can be invalidated (ditched options in favor of profits, applies to minds emphasizes too (people, pressure selection), competition to elimination from things that can't compare or on the disadvantageous aspects of its play of priorities and emphasizes). And that applies to left-right paranoids who think everything, except their unfairness hell of a best system, which is on a track to end humanity, is evil communism...

Politicians will have to take a different form if they want to get some shine back into what they're supposed to like doing, since democracy is the dream come true of both our politicians and people, and bankers are not there, replaced by computers. No leftist no rightist either, there's a basis of comfort, an people gain value beyond that, no conservatists, no liberalists, no democrats or republicans, no money too, replaced by a credit system. In a life reality, it is concerned people who decide everything with the help of adequate expertise and an efficient, simple, and easy decision interface, and no bankers.

No bankers? How am I going to accomplish this you're asking? Just as I should, by taking what I learned of life and the universe, and from "enjoying" hell (I know it could be worse, I'm not even supposed to be born you know...It's full of scary example and devices to make my skin crawl at the insanity, but you have my style of creativity now, because I decided I would not take your shit? Oh, finally, someone questioning the shit of the system globally, let's give him more troubles and try to make him like everybody, or a monster, that's the best we can do, make his life hell...) An it's you that's stupid, as the more I gain understanding the greater the chasm and the more irreversible your doom, you failed to debark me from the line, each tentative backfired to make you smaller and me bigger, now I debark and crush your laughing. If you're to shoot yourself in the foot by going all out with things like Christianity, then know that the logic of your ideology is logically a single person becoming god and ending it all, which can only be a human, and you thing that as the human that I am I'll take this fucking role you made up? I'm revolted, insulted embarrassed fort the whole humanity, this is a shame, that you should put these kind of insanities on the shoulders of the people with the best potential, to break them by their own attitude, you put everything on these shoulders, but I'm here to remind you that every shovelful of free troubles you give to good or life will never go unnoticed, even if you're an atheist that don't believe shit past death, it is your own people that will despise you as they thrusted you, like me, as they reap always more troubles as things forever go better...You will respect people who bring new ideas, not fight or compete or ostracize them if they can't fit your profiting structures or mental hierarchy of control.

It's a shame there is no way to measure where I'd be today if I had been helped instead of given troubles, I guess it goes with the reality; in hell I'm given troubles as a way of learning, and people who try fail because their profound intents are tainted by the ideology, or they don't have the competence to deal with me, nobody does because nobody really want to understand because this storm is in my head, this creativity, in a paradise I would have lived a completely different life and people would have succeeded in helping me, giving valor to a far safer and better learning strategy than dropping the baby in hell.... But again it got a logical aspect to it, it works at the beginning, it's the only way, but the more you become civilized, the more you tend to put languages and knowledge in books and transmit it through learning institutions, but again this transformation is limited and morphed by the ideology or reality. It's one other aspect of the irony of hell (this reality is a metaphor of hell for good, or a paradise for evil, don't think I see daemons; these are excellent descriptions of a general realist vision of the extremes associated with good and evil and its result, everything bricks itself perfectly, what doesn't make sense is again religious stuff like the lake of fire, which may exist just because the UI decided something funny...That's what you get for trying to indoctrinate the whole planet, to the lake of fire idea, and be very careful with such a logical entity, you build your life around what you can request and what you'll be served, not much requesting and lots of serving if you're scared of your truth, but then you could be dipped a little in the lake of fire, to be served as a quick cooked fiery human! The other view that's interesting here is that the more you are far from Lucifer's embrace, the more you live and see irony, which tends to reveal itself the more far away good is from evil...

Basic concepts, no choice about it, those same concepts I have tested against this reality all through my work, and new ones I'll have to invent. I'll invent a fresh new vision in total harmony with all what I wrote to date, ok? I'll develop and explain the basic vision of many systems to prove a different reality is a realist possibility. You'll have to judge and modify and modelize my ideal vision though, but I'll tell you the extent you can go, what can form a new reality, what are the difficulties I see etc. I know idealism always need some resizing in reality, but everything starts by an ideal or a vision that wants to become a truth, and that's my part, the initial point, the inspiration, a continuation of my destiny.

Next is my reality vision that some will want to attack by saying that the notion of different realities can't exist, so they can use my work any way they like, probably to make hell more irremediable by devaluating the associations I make. The shut up argument that shit can't exist I've had it, it means nothing, it's not an argument, and there's room for a lot of shit to exist within perfection, it's your choice and your opposition...First, don't confound reality into civilization, reality is a whole of everything that's going on around people, while civilization is specific, there can be many civilizations (societies) different from each others by how they manage their life energy (means) and mental-cultural emphasizes, but realities is another matter, it's like the attachment net that hold it all together which mostly takes the form of means circulation, and the general mentality that is emphasized, like massive unfairness everywhere as a result of worldwide competition etc. I really think there are only 2 fundamental realities defined by the ideology they encourage most because from what I understand it's a matter of trying to take the best path, at the beginning of civilization, and you can't reload, you embark on the test of proving if you're really civilized or it's just bullashit, but at some point we'll remind you that you can still take the other path as you continue to make the conditions harder to fulfill, until someday you'll simply have missed the opportunity, like an old love story. In a sense, a reality stop at its interrelations, and the interrelations go all the way down to the roots, all the way to behind the facade, the hypocrisy, it's all about the real intents, the real story. I'll say that the reason of a reality defines the holding net of independent forms of civilization, like country competition defines the net of current reality. A new reality can successfully bear the name when it contains an independent civilization with a different fundamental ideal that what already exists. Is that enough for you? So, as I did all through all my work, I'll continue to talk about the reality; the philosophy or ideology base that can form one or many civilizations. Just don't forget that "reality" as a word is in the same situation as "destiny" I just described a few paragraph earlier.

A big paragraph to explain some aspect that people shouldn't care about, but it's interesting prevention, a big aspect of my intelligence in hell, apart from all the troubles, and this is the leftover of my imagination and power of creativity, after much training in hell, a crack at something else, maybe an escape, the where I should be, the where I could be, and why not, if I'm to live hell I'll live it as an adventure that will lead life to a better future.

I'll set the basis for a lot of systematization principles, I think you can guess what path the systematization will take; life examples and principles, ego control, goals, high consciousness, judgment, things like that. Now, before we get all excited, understand that I won't go crazy, and no big math either, simplicity is not to be seen as a path, but that's how all starts. What I want are the principles and concepts forming the reality and civilization to be understood, I want to show how a new reality can be possible from a practically opposite mentality. So don't tell me it won't work because I did not talk about toilet paper, I don't have the time or patience to do everything myself, or deal with all the details of interrelated production specifics as I explore which logistic scenario is best to clean your ass, anyway, one reality is too much complexity to deal with for most people, think about 2 realities; this stuff is a matter of LSD people, which are probably the ones government consult on the matter of consciousness and realities, from the looks of it, after that they smoke crack while thinking about it... I probably won't forget something important, but leave me alone with the toilet paper; if you want to live in a different reality then show it, do something about it, contribute.

The new reality principle comes from understanding the futility of explaining things superficially and supposing people will suddenly change in a planetary reality that will give an overwhelming pressure to develop people for its own success. Thinking, saying, describing in text, applying with some success, thinking, saying, reading over, correcting, the process of change is all over there, and while the one taking the quest and spending its energy and time in it can become a stronger reflection, as soon as you remove one step or tool (like saying), or reduce the effort to succeed, you decrease the potential for change, so you can't just listen to me with an open mouth thinking you'll change for it, you need to do some introspection and questioning while having a lead, believing, brainwashing and copying will only bring you so far. I can't just give a cold list of things, I got to talk about myself so you can see the processes I'm under and where I am in my thinking and why, and I limit that greatly because I have to adapt what I provide with this reality to form the line I walk, unless I get qualified as a psychopath or a narcissist. And finally, understanding these things you have a better idea why I'm a loner, so I'm not a sociopath, I can make friends and keep them easily, I even sometimes think people like me a little too much, and it's just that I'm not in a situation to get a oiling and a tan from all the liking, maybe later though...Even today I'm not that much different than most people fundamentally, I'm sure there are many who think a little like me, I'm not out of reach, people feel that, I'm just not realist they think, or when jealousy is involved I get a mental problem, but copying my evidently useful attitudes is not enough. My point is, not only it's difficult to change profoundly when you use all the tools to do it, but this is harder if you don't have time in a constant planetary or social pressure selection process, thus the importance to see things as a matter of new reality. I really thought at some point that I just had to explain things for reality to change if my opinion made enough sense, but understanding all what's involved then the only solution I see is to reverse engineer things, start from 0, make a new reality that people can live in easily, and just by the intrinsic of living then people develop differently; exactly what this reality did; it started from 0, and the new reality must start from 0 too, but with all the tools humanity developed instead of rocks. It's just that at an epoch the environment was made of rocks, and now the environment is made of computers.

Science has made a tremendous jump, and if it was better associated and manipulators and profiteers removed from monopolizing the associated expertises, it could rebuild this world to eventually fit 5 billions people in comfort and environmental stability. But it's a thousand year goal with the building of another reality in mind, and science is science, there is more to life than science, and it simply can't cope with today's problems. But things are still in a new phase, the present stuff is big stuff, and big stuff takes lots of time to become worldwide reality; replacing polluting and energy inefficient "scrap" with brand new well studied shiny stuff all over the place is one great quest, impossible under its best form when it is a world of profiting industrials dreaming of big money over any little innovation, they'll prefer producing short life garbage design gadgets while making pub and Lady Gaga songs saying everybody is cool, hot, sexy, and smart if they have a phone full AI connect that crashes, as they play games full of bugs, quick production from competition, profits, more exploitation of resources, more garbage, more pollution. Science is science, it is not leadership, not logistics, alone it is worthless, it is a base of knowledge and information of many levels and complexity, that's why it must be well associated, then people can learn to use it with its hands to morph reality at once.

So we'll need more than this crude basic start as a proof of concept that things can work. We'll do it through a digitalization and simulation of the reality; we'll digitalize a place and build everything from scratch, and anybody will be able to use and test it. This digitalization process will become a "simple" simulation of the workings of it all, where people download the project, run it on their computers and do their things like drawing a building or judging something, sent to the main sites for addition or global judgment or for getting a suggestion globally judged and implemented. The simulation will probably end up as the true working of it, transferred as the brand new computer net of the reality. We will then continue using this system, improving it, growing it in power and capacity, it will become the central brain of the reality, or the unconscious of it if you prefer, while not forgetting that what we build in reality is not a simulation, we can't save and restart, we have to define a very complex and realist schema of priorities to develop things optimally, to minimize mistakes, and while our goal will make this process somewhat linear, we must have a maximum of options available all along.

To start on how things will be, while persisting with life analogies, I'll say that every person will have a personal file which will permit them to be citizens and to get in communication with a central unit, that way everyone will become a consciousness "cell", and the communication system; the "nervous" system. The "heart" is where high consciousness given time value will be stashed and, through the global judgment of the "mind", circulated to every "cells", services and construction project. The life reality itself will become the growing "body".

On your computer you may run the program that will be the interface between you and reality unconsciousness (the central data stashing and processing computer architecture, the system that permits the "body" to work by itself). Once the interface is running, you'll have a button to download the latest updated version of the interface with all the new stuff (including different skin options and background images like the updated digitalized vision of the first city).

You'll have drawings of the reality and all kind of options like mouse cursor hovering explanation on details and vision features.

You'll have access to drawing boards of different complexities, if you want to suggest changes, be them profound or cosmetic.

You'll have access to a detailed vision of the "heart" (the "economy") with its different attachments, and where they go, the capacity, the input and output rate etc. It will all be visual, with all kind of imaginative ways to express it (skins).

You'll have access to the global judgment activity place too, which I'll write about later too. That's where the "competition" between consciousness and unconsciousness will take place.

So, taking life as a lead, i could say that by this I'm creating something like the initial unconscious, or the approximate ideal when all that is known is taken into consideration. It's not my pretention, but the part I'm supposed to like, my part, which maybe later I'll like, is doing creativity in a general sense, and my writing proves that i care about all aspects of existing, to the point of being interested in comprehending way beyond what's evident, always in a logical manner. But I'm nothing without the work of my ancestors, I just became a specialist in my niche, based on the work of millions of people. But I must still be rewarded the worth of my work, as I refuse to do for nothing the same way I refuse to do for everything. Sacrificing one's life is no better than competing to take a maximum.

As the reality grows, consciousness (result from understanding) will be optimized as unconscious, or the basis functioning of the reality. See it as automating in efficiency what people really want as a reality to live in, globally, basically, within the limitations we are forced to by life and matter, while developing the potential at reaching minimally logical goals; and that can be fairness, or the colonizing of another planet and many more.

If you don't want to know about the universe as a human then you have no place here, we don't want people counterproductive toward noble or logical goals, even if counter-productivity at such far reached or big goals is hard to determine; we may presently look counterproductive toward some goals, but if you extend the time slab you can say some kind of counter-productivity was critical to some of our understanding facets, it was a necessary harm, kind of, and you can see some bad aspects as a necessary civilization step too, where you eliminate losers or those you can fool easily, a step needed by everybody, even life systems and gods for the spiritual me, they wouldn't want future losers and self-accepted slaves, don't you think? They want you to be the best because it is logical and that's all, no depression or mediocrity here.

So things must be seen at their equivalent time of our history, this part of our story may be hard, crazy, or interesting, but whatever I diabolize for evolution in 10 000 years it will be a little part of history, among many interesting parts where I will not be. My creation and job is just different, I could do entertainment, or create programs, but I just decided to do this, sorry for you, I decided to make a magical cake, an expensive one, a delicious one for life, and it's surely not the mushy or chocolate full sugar kind; it stands, it holds, it provides, and instead of distributing it the classic way, leaving it to anarchy until most of it is systemized under the control of sufficiently competent manipulators, I'll do the distributing laws, and the cake will only get better. And if you concede that cakes in this reality are unfairly divided, then I have the right to unfairly divide mine too, based on my vision of good and evil too. But it won't happen, I'll just make the cake with laws to protect its existence from ego gluttony then you do what you want with it, add your touch, change its form or laws of its distribution, etc. (if you don't know how I see good and evil, then you are better read my other books (chapters) prior to this one).

Once the reality works from itself, which may take a hundred years or more, I envision that the unconscious (the base) will be under continual pressure and harassment from consciousness (new stuff), from all kind different pressures for changes and implementation. That will go on until most conflict disappears, which will only be possible in future times. As time passes the unconsciousness (the base) will slowly become the true will of the people and almost no consciousness competition work versus unconsciousness will be left, freeing more and more the people's mind capacities which will be added to the positive effect of living with fewer conflicts in our mind and in our actions, a less complicated basis of understanding, even new genetic eases. We will have reached harmony, somewhat of an equilibrium (you can't go farther than a "somewhat" with that), happiness, long term survival and most important of all; life will embrace us for a new explosion of appropriate imagination and creativity, unless you decide not to use your brains anymore, but that may be very hard since you'll be happier, in a better reality and with a well interrelated mind. You don't have to take this for hard cash, but I can't stop my mind and will to do something while I should be deep in depression, so I do something right somewhere... But I already talked about the factors in reality that can influence willpower in a previous chapter, sure that if you are living in a reality that you don't like, or that makes you depressive, of feel entrapped in a cheat, or that profits from your innocence, or that you don't care about, or if you lost faith in humanity, or love, or if your mind is too much of a mess, any of this can lead you to laziness or fat, or crime, or to the loss of your soul ("soul" as a word is in the same situation as "destiny" I just described a few paragraph earlier).

Next, there is no need for more than 2 realities trying a different way on a planet, a competition of many realities variations is worse than a country, and you'll eventually understand that there no use to it since ego reality is the default, always there, reality. It will probably always exist, there will always be people better there, but it is an out of control thing with inadequate priorities that we have absolutely no choice to control the appetite of. People can travel between realities, have a vacation, try it, but not live in 2 realities at the same time, no need for an explanation, it's just wrong, so at some point in your life you'll have to choose permanence, preferably as a young adult. A balance system will give both realities their just worth of limited things. Father reality will do what it wants with its shares, and people overwhelmed by self-interests will go there to compete over what to do with it depending on its priorities, that's their place, and there won't be hesitation because that's the way of things, we won't punish people if they can be happy in hell, but we won't let anybody give us troubles for sure, and since you have only one identity, if someone has no right to be in our lands he will be hunted away.

From now on there will be two realities under fair global judgment rules, if you want a third one make a prison that costs nothing. Anyway, before complaining and bitching, begin by making a new one for a start, or are you still questioning the 2 reality principle? New stuff? No? Then why is there only one? I don't see another one anywhere, get to work, or are you invalid? Too late? Everything is failing except the babbling device that will carry-on right to the tomb? Cannot stop it? All our civilization made for it? And what have you deduced?

Presently, father reality is an unfair reality that possesses everything and has proven it can't be trusted to work in an adequate manner with life, but we are under the will of its systems, and so if we are to make another reality that can grow in territory, it will have to offer international guarantees. So whatever the new reality starts in a country or a country decide to be, which could "easily" be done with enough will, in 1000 years it will be our cultural roots, the first to experiment the birth of a new reality. But such roots must be profound and have the potential to spread diversity, that's why as many countries as possible should get involved. It will be the first true ground on which we experiment ways to bring everybody together under fair rules, see what the people think of it, even if you'll have a good idea long before actually starting it.

Since it may well be possible that we'll be able to try starting a new reality only once, then everything must be taken into consideration, including politics and potential attacks or invasions. The father reality must have a globally strong attachment to it and will to birth and defend it, it must be proven, and the place where we'll start it must be one of the most strongly attached to it.

Now, everything will be a very simple start because that's how things always start: simple. But don't worry, things will get complicated quick enough, and in a thousand years you will hardly believe the reality you live in comes from such humble beginnings, or not humble, humbled. There was an epoch when things were so simple you didn't know how to write or count and philosophy was eating or getting eaten; that was the question, and no depression permitted, but we cried...

There can be no end to perfecting and detailing to describe a new reality (try to describe this reality in all its details...), and you don't want to add too much complexity on things that may end-up as mistakes of human understanding. So I'll explain the basis of most concepts simply, and they will be made functional in complexity on the life reality simulation internet site. I don't have what it takes to describe and make a reality work in total complexity as is the case with everything that I write about; had I developed as a mathematician I wouldn't be writing this. Anyway, I'm a few year ahead of my time and no human can have a maximum level of profundity in all necessary skills to make a "world go round". Third, I am not "god". I do what I have to do, and people, if it interests them, will go to the extent its worth to them; you don't have to make me feel bad any more than I already do, just don't care at the worst, I'll manage the deception in hell... What I'll do will be more than enough for people to know if they truly want another whole different way and contribute. If not, then it means that whatever the effort I make it was not worth it, because what would be needed is a god, and when one is around people have a tendency to feel and be insignificant. I am not "god", I'm human and I need more help than I can get.

Next, forget complaining about your inability to transfer the bag of dependences, problems, specificities and complexities that make you an ideal citizen (city people are so zen...) of this reality; we want those who truly have enough of it, you can read over, you must truly, with proofs, show that you have enough of this reality, that you are ready to move to another planet to not be part of it anymore. So forget it if you're too dependent, full of stuff, or on the neutral, we want those who move without bottles of pills or trailers of garments, those who drop their hammer to grow and cook food, we will want such people as our foundation, our strength, our memory, and we will keep that memory forever because we'll update death too; we will de-emphasis sending people to the mortuary granite business, that should have ended with the fall of gothism (Gotham city, vampires, English caste view of family dynasty and hegemony, still heavily publicized as a cultural trait, and we're still living in a reality that is under its tentacles, gothic monsters are waiting, under the coverture of another language, to still have friends, to put the fault on another culture under its grip if god is not careful when he squashes virulent nests of evil, but don't worry, god makes the difference between the manipulator and the manipulated, and he know the language in which stuff is produced, for those who think it matters, and who's to say languages are unimportant to one's culture? And who decided that putting your paw in the culture of others was not a crime? And who's the specialist at that?), and religions too, we don't want them around death anymore, except as personal preference of adults, which will be written in their personal file, and reality with family will reflect the will, within some limitations, like heritage money that won't exist anymore; everybody on the same ground (we won't see it as a competition to gain but to use, so you won't try to get a pile to spend and transfer it to your kids that will buy himself a big inappropriate car, no, everybody has equal access to the pile, and if you want a big car as a kid you'll have to either justify it or work for it. The exception is the family car or your parents, so it would be a good idea to take great care of them if you want to profit from their endless generosity). The same for space, this mentality is not logic so it won't work for us, no amount of money will make you possess an inch of land in our reality, so you would be very out of your mind to condemn a whole freaking square meter of it with your cadaver, you wouldn't have that pretention don't you? But we will keep your personal file forever if you choose, what you choose, we won't make you an after death party to forget you, we'll make one to remember you instead, because what you did is eternal. We'll do it in far more truth, you set your personal settings but it's the end of massive historical lies, we're done with that, only evil people need to fuck with history or show how superior they are by imposing inferiority to others instead of helping them thrive from fair ways.

Some reasons for this reality will be to permit the rise of a civilization that will to fulfill the great ideals that manipulators classically use to gain philanthropic admiration; like happiness, free mass communication (not the complex scrap for profit we have today), minimization of war and poverty, more true love, freedom of knowledge, etc. Then there are vision goals like a safe planet, equilibrium for a maximum of life survival, and the reaching and colonizing of other planets with an afterthought for the stars. We will see far in the future and we will control any fear we'll find, we will be safe in our knowledge that everybody will live a comfortable life without risks, we will guarantee life's survival on earth as long as the sun wills it, and if we are to go to space we'll bring along butterflies or it's a no go (figuratively, butterflies need a planet to move them around, so we'll have to carry the planet in the cargo hold, which is unrealistic (poor animals, imagine the feeling of having whole aspects of your potential repressed, knowing it, you think animals don't think? You should think that all those animals we manipulated don't feel and even know they lost something in the (farmer's selection) trade to become dependent of humans for their survival? Many lost hope, yes... But the whole animal world has to trust us, reluctantly, but we are its culmination here, we eat each other on the survival aspect because of the energy and existence, but we are all one (so we should stop that if we can, or minimize it, eating animal meat presently should be seen as an exceptional thing (I'm at 3 times a week...), and all those people paying big money to get poorer people to take the blame and the risk of killing animals so they can get their gland of aphrodisiac or whatever else special part, should know that whatever you're a big human full of means, you can go a lot lower than a microbe in your value...). So life is sure of the reality of earth to the point of growing humans and all kind of animals that migrate under the flat earth, but we are still stuck with the sun, the moon, and stars, what is all this machination? And now it's getting an idea of the harshness of empty space between it all, the challenge, but too bad, life's been through a lot, it even did the dinosaurs in its youth, to express the violence of its frustration, but empty space is that killer? Really? But my point was that we'll never know for sure exactly what's that machination, and when you think you know here debark a guy like me to topple it all upside down, while talking about the fitting perfection of everything for life and entities like the UI, scrambling the whole mental and religious paradigm of knowledge, and I stand for life at its best, and I say everything make sense, and the challenge is entirely worth it, so I'm sorry if we can't make devious plans to take over the world, sorry if I don't interpret everything right, maybe you're too cryptic and slow to pass your messages, so I take the lead with the best mentality, philosophy and spirituality I can net together logically, I expose possibilities and probabilities, if you're not happy just stop me. Whatever belief we have, as long as we don't go see we're stuck with the existential problem because if you don't care you die and the rest of life is stuck with the problem, until only the most willing in the universe remains, but not willing to do anything, willing to listen, understand, and develop a successful survival strategy, which implies a vision of good and evil, to have critical aspects of your judgment capacity able to take a better path (decision) instead of a worst one. The problematic here is that we are the only palpable intelligence around, everything comes out of our head, and we have to deal with missing logical aspects that we will never be able to deduct for certain, in our battles to decide what's the best attitude to have.

The intrinsic ways of this new reality will lead people to surpass the problems this reality failed to minimize, most of which its stability is dependent from, or have a market (like the war weapons market). Our reality will be free of those horrors, pains and inefficiencies that ego gods plagued humanity with, and, even if it will be a lot of work, we'll have fun doing it, we will make a beautiful reality with a stable base. I'm still realist, it will take a while and much work to get things and mentalities working well, but if I'm any reflection of anything motivational in my oppositional situation, then i say you'll most likely appreciate when you'll live in the end result and understand what have been stolen from you from the beginning. And our ego won't be left for show, this is only the start, as all these goals will drive us to the stars where we will find all we need to do the craziest of projects and where we will all be able to grow our ego as much as we want without doing it on the back of life or innocence.

So, first thing first, we'll need some kind of knowing of where we're going, the process of which I made as I wrote until now, but that is more usable if we see it as a list of goals and ideals to which we will want to affect efficiency values and upon which we will base our vision of things. You don't travel the stars randomly, you select a destination then reach it, and so it is with us; you don't live randomly, you live with goals, and the most important is the farthest one; the result of your living. What do you want it to be? What are the possibilities? You must have an idea, no? Then you can prepare, visualize, build stuff and change to reach that goal, or do it with better efficiency, ahead of time, or better prepared, or under your best form. We know that eventually it would be a good idea to settle ourselves in another star, maybe we'll need to terra-form one of our planet for it first, but that's one of the farthest goal we can find, along with taking our best form. Such goals will form the basis of it all, you can make a pyramid of under-goals to reach them, but you got to prioritize too, so, while moving far away goals to the back of your mind, let's find what will be important to successfully create a reality and a mentality to go with such endeavors.

-Planetary environment control is a goal we'll work toward in the long run, while taking care of the environment and life, working on as many facets of it as we can.

-Health and happiness too will be what we want.

-We want to be fair too.

-We want to have our say on things.

-We want love and adequate independence

-We want safety, efficiency, peace and evolution.

-Cultural societies equilibrium and birth control will be a basis on which the new reality stands; I believe good intents can go a long way for that, but there are a few options, mainly education, but at the limit we won't be shy to issue permits for that, to bring more of those super life expensive precious humans to existence, to feel how great it is to live, and contribute in a good way, living is a privilege. The goal is to have no culture overwhelm the others while keeping an emphasis on having them mix with others. While you can always make a baby as a savage or mistake, but that won't be looked upon as socially civilized in our reality, it's a matter of mentality, maybe your place is in the other reality, it's so much a nice place that it considers itself the only way, go there with your unquestionable freedoms. What do you want? One or two realities? When I was younger I was more on the total destroy kind of side, simpler, less caring, interesting for the innocent, with its bullshit arguments (the elite of hell is good at that...), but most likely a trap that makes you evil. Now I'm more trying to take the most ideal path, we are all people and we want this thing to work, so we take the attitude necessary for it and we'll succeed if we are strong, persistent, and diligent as much as we've been to make hell, or is it more? And btw, here we put true love at the forefront, so there will be less matron women (mother hen) who seek to find control or superiority through the making of tons of children for a video show of exemplary pride where you can barely manage the desire for condescendence, activities like that.

-Spirituality versus the unknown, if it has no negative effect, can increase a lot of good things in us, giving us a powerful imaginary vision. Where science doubt or make probabilities, there is space for spirituality.

-Science, evidently, is a logical goal.

-Stopping the destruction for exploitation of life, particularly high consciousness life.

-Enlargement but simplification of reality basis learning for the youth.

-Always increasing fundamental basis of wellbeing.

-Minimizing of industrial needs is important, as is efficiency.

-Exploitation of limited resources under equilibrium laws.

-Seeking and preserving true history is another far goal.

-Even the thriving and encouragement of an appropriate love vision is a goal, but again, no exaggeration, you must not solely see it as a percentage, but as an endorsed form too, with some will, by most people, like a choice of pressure, and you can replace pressure by the happiness ways of the reality; we don't want adults to put competition pressure on youth sexuality for a start.

-Elimination of hunger, poverty, exploitation of people, traffic of people, youth indoctrination by drug cartels, sects, religions, propaganda, PMBBD etc. all in all, terminate the vision of innocence as the malleability to make the economy (adapt people to the profits machine, or if you prefer; the end of profiting from innocence. Your personal interplays as you gain experience and find your way may not be of importance here, but it won't pass at the mass level, that's the place where any law enforcement should put its emphasis if it wants to have a minimum of credibility in being seen as something else than glorified mercenaries.

There are many more you can find, it's not that hard to have good civilization goals, a bit harder to decompose to their related efficiency structuring, but doable with computers and the minds that understand them, and globally associated people...

People can give priorities to those, and efficiency values as decomposed facets and steps, and you can even do it with the funkiest of goals; I know some goals I described are very vague, but you can still apply a vague value.

Now you'll tell me your reality have those goals, but you never gave them an actual value of advancement with related monetary rewards, meaning you didn't really care to develop them under their best form, so they became perverted to PMBBD for profits, this reality simply can't be efficient at developing a "noble" goal in its true good form, it is too fond of making complex bullshit for profits (I'm not talking about facets, these come and go with time), they are mainly manipulative tools, PMBBD in the mouth of politician gangs and profiteers who want to make eternal hegemonies out of them when possible since most goals develop as cakes (power or profit sources).

As for the nobility goal (what the heck is nobility doing here), I will add, to recapitulate the spirit of the book, that things will end-up quite different as to who possess the richness; the worth of most people will increase tremendously to be nearer their true worth (what makes you believe otherwise? Bullshit arguments?), and that will unleash human development, and creativity (as a human that went through a lot, I have faith to believe it will; have you been through a lot too?). There won't be 1% de-responsibilized with PMBBD possessing 99%, it will eventually be 99% responsible (being responsible is not a bad or difficult thing) people possessing everything, with probably 1% in trouble or frustration. Instead of adapting population to max ego, we'll adapt ego to population, just like that! Inside out kind of weird!

It is important to have a simple list of good goals, but we'll need to decompose them; for some, the best and appropriate visual structure will be a pyramid of different necessities in order of importance to reach it, a pyramid here is only a visualization tool, what is important is to have main goals with a tree of other goals to be efficient in to increase efficiency toward the main goals. And those must be available to people visually and easily in the computer interface of the reality, that way, someone clicking on a goal can move through what is needed to reach more efficiency in it, decomposing it in more complex description too, with general salaries and education needs. And that means a priority and efficiency value given to a maximum of goals.

You don't have to make things complicated or perfect, just feel, for now, and time will make things more complete, right, complex and whatever. Priorities will change as efficiency is gained anyway, so don't systematize things in cement, everything is dynamic and changing here, no laws are permanent, only the basic philosophy that permit the reality to succeed, after that, who knows how things will develop. We are very far from that for now, our main goal is to start the reality and before that we need to simulate it, and we don't even know what it is for now, apart that goals are important, and that's how I'll continue explaining things.

Apart from precise reality goals to reach, we'll work within a well-defined and more civil appropriate ideology (you don't have to believe or follow it, it's just the basic philosophy of the reality) and we'll build the reality along with it. How we want to become are goals to note and walk toward too; independence must increase for us, while not forgetting that we are dependent from the best systematization we can invent that can bring us more time independence. Maximum willing judgment activity will be used. Our basis will be higher, larger and simpler. Ego control will be systemized and made law as there is always someone to profit from any opportunity and condemn others to his designs for it.

If you give well intentioned people possible goals, goals they believe in and like, they will attain those goals, no need to profit from them. You must not deal or contort them for self-interests ideally and the same for the road to those goals; there can be a multitude of unpredictable obstacles in the way, but ego will never be the best solution. You can make of anything a goal; don't think that the diversity ego reality has, a lot by inadvertence from its ways, is the only way to have diversity, even if that diversity still arose from peoples having goals of profiting (the diversity you have is meant for ego goals, there is not much diversity where it doesn't bring profits). As we start it may look the contrary, but don't worry, we'll make a show of diversity on aspects you never thought could exist, reality specifics, or forgotten potential given a new chance, and no rich conglomerate around, it's people that decide where or what, with adequate expertise as a guide; they like diversity in something? They'll eventually have it depending if they're at the beginning of the new reality or if it doesn't interfere with other priorities, which will change with time.

Diversity is an important goal in itself, directly related to what you want marketed or not, so people will have to make laws to encourage it; we'll encourage the one that want to make carrot wine a little more if we got 10 times the diversity in raisin wine. Even if most people don't like it, we should try to keep the option open for the long run if it doesn't cost much to reality, just a few farmers, instead of mercilessly crushing them in competition capitalism style of selection to obliteration in little character paranoia (make their life a hell)... It's still better to have a different market exist than more of the same, but that is relative to the market type and again it's a matter of priorities. We don't have to only publicize raisin wine, or talk like food can only be good with raisin wine; put the new at the forefront, give it a little push, is it good? Then give it more space, more visibility, don't compete it, and if someday it become as big as raisin whine, then stop the help, still no competition (except people choosing, the logical good of the market if it is fair), then it will slip back to its most likely strength as a market, but always susceptible to external factors, unless concerned people (the majority of the population, not just the producers, if it's a reality matter, unless a cultural entity is willing to specialize in the matter, or you and your gang of amateurs are ready to spare a bit of your life energy (money) to influence the market, which will be acceptable because nobody is a billionaire...) If the carrot wine really tastes bad the market will stay small but still exist, that way it will become better with time, or people may suddenly start liking it, or new data may make it an aphrodite panacea. No need for competition, just existence, time, a place to publicize it, and an open mind. If nobody on earth ever tasted any wine and we opened a market with 200 different wines, you think people would all become raisin wine crazy? That's how deep in PMBBD we are. All we need for diversity is the goal of having it and the means to reach the goal. As for the way it can be made, there are all kind of ways, and when it's a pleasure you can bet people will want to play in the details of it, so you can be sure there will be means reserved to encourage small markets, like this reality is often forced to do to modify consumers. If the goal is market diversity, then people will find ways to have it, they may make a law, or directly transfer credits, and if a better way is found as time advances they won't be condemned to fight for years to implement it, they'll open the new possibility immediately. What people want is supposed to become reality if it is realist, if good and evil as a life vision is a part of the argumentation...And if you don't care then kill yourself, I don't care. If people are undecided if they want to invest more, the request will be put under a revision algorithm. As you can see, we'll be better if we remember what we stand for as we take decisions, and that's one thing that this reality won't make, a set of goals and a logical definition of good and evil so people are better guided when they take a decision that will affect the life of others, but it will make tons of biased laws to "guide" you though authority...

Competition is a tool for elimination, selection, standardization (you become like your competitor because there is only one best path whatever the goal, so either you force limitations that invalidates the legality of your competition, or you eventually battle on and for the same thing, scraping everything and condemning stuff and people to the mentality that won (the goal, which can be immortality, a very bad idea for an ego ideology, which will take the form in reality as systematizations that will profit most closely related mentalities, family and systems that better serve the likes of ourselves.) good for sports and entertainment, but it must be highly limited everywhere else. It's like meeting services, in the 90's there was a telephone meeting system in my city, voice only, I used it and met many girls, most not my style, but still it was working at an acceptable price (around 30$ a month) for someone like me. Then came the internet with a multitude of meeting sites, and chat places, it was hyped as the future, it would connect people like never before, and so everybody embarked in the hype and the telephone meeting system closed doors, competition is so good it actually eliminated a very fine option from existing, and the result of this competition is that I never meet a girl again from a dating service, I spent maybe a thousand bucks in different internet meeting services and I never saw someone for real. Is it me? I got very nice pictures. Is it my text? I think they were at least ok, I caught girls doing voice after all... So why did I succeed at meeting girls from a voice system, while I can't meet one on the internet? Because I'm money flow! And that's all there is to internet meeting services for a cute guy my age; some will even manipulate things to prevent you from meeting women, even if they have fancy looking nice features there to give the impression that everybody happily meet all the time and they are very effective at it. It is all a lie, they have tons of bots, fake profiles generators and twisted ways, and they are particularly useful against someone like me that would easily find a match if not for their manipulations (I'm sure the situation is different for women or older people, I'm talking as a young man around 30 and my personal experience, think.). I failed because we are in a reality of profiteers and cheaters, and their competition not only limits my liberties, but eliminates excellent options from availability. And I'm not talking about the pollution of junk emails I get as a result, it's like they distributed my address to the whole world of sex crazies, and none of them can provide me with a link to a picture of myself (a test I made), all fakes, a new batch every day, nonstop for years, whatever I select them all as scam...

Now, as I already said, everything is a question of priorities, we can't have the production diversity of this planetary reality at its top, the beginnings of the new reality are humble, it may take a hundred to a thousand years to reach that level, but we'll want it, and then go beyond it. Evidently there are diversities that are reality specific, and that's without talking about how we'll see cultural society diversity development, which won't be a competition anymore; there won't be a vast Canada full of English, such a territory will be developed to contain 30 diverse protected societies all open to each other without passports, all with somewhat the same chances to develop their diversity, they won't compete to take over the world or take the most lands. The reality will be their association link, the international fairness base, the basis everybody will have, that which will permit us to exist as a civilization with a different ideal, that which include the life point (credits) circulation structure and the basis to give everybody a comfortable (comfortable is comfortable, stop thinking communism) standard of living.

As for fundamental goals, even evil is not stupid enough to make the affirmation that life is not much important to civilization and thus not worth making goals related to it a priority. So why, apart from your dependent pet, are we so incompetent in showing how it is important to us? It should be our greatest priority, not the last with entertainment and profiting as the main civilization priorities.

So you understand the importance or priority of our goals will most of the time be proportional to where we can help life in its goals, even if it passes by making a reality where humans (life) will be happy. The problem is not to deduct the importance of life, the problem is to change people who don't care, those who act like their responsibility is to have a job and money and fun; life is more than that, and the most fundamental principle driving its survival is that there is a best way all the way to a worst way in everything, see it as good and evil since our survival is dependent on our aptitude at being the best, and for that you logically need to act in a good manner.

As for deducting one's value, it will always be vague and relative, but you can bet that having some kind of guiding line made of civilization goals will help. There are goals that we will never end advancing in, developing the form of the reality, and there are precise "window" goals that can give immediate benefits, even a golden age if successful and well associated with other goals.

There is nothing like a day where everything goes wrong, thanks to yourself, they say, and the same when everything goes well, thank to yourself, it is your choice, they say, in most instances maybe, but you know what happens when things go wrong for too long, they break down and end-up wasted, often things which can save everything are destroyed that way, from too much frustration, and that's in part why I write this book, for myself to discover this anger source that persist on grow the more I understand it, and i know that no argument overwhelm the hysteria effect that it cause to the stupid i usually deal with, but i don't want people to do things because they fear, but because they understand, so I consider my anger as a handicap, even if I'll manage to canalize some to positive effects, like inspiration. What today, I know and fear, is that's what's inside humanity too, repressed, but it is my opinion that good life understanding can reveal the hurt, the steal, the cheat, the rape, in invested people overwhelmed by self-interests and divided in bullshit without even a start of a life ideology, the last thing to come to mind in hell, the biggest revelation, so that's the other aspect of things going on among the panoply that coincide to take form within my work, to say that anger is definitively not the best solution to take the path of life, you end-up playing the same competition game of I'm stronger than you so listen to my authority and laws and police and army and media industry, and if you want to change the boss vote within this delimitation that's supposed to prove we're thinking different and worth an independent space. If not we'll make it so in the bullshit detail of it so you'll only see cultural fire... thing concern is reaching a critical point, and governments know that understanding things correctly and caring with proofs (they're missing understanding too, in fact, except for the new wave that "love" the ass of lobbyists so much they got their face stuck there, and old crapulous caricatural characters (CCC type personality), a lot of politicians (let's say 1 on 3 feels generous), if given the right understanding have the best attitude for the emancipation of life, they just got entrapped in hell, following educational bias (home and school) and hierarchy, poor them, are they poor or rich? That is one question, they should stand for the good stuff at my salary and level of difficulty to test themselves a bit...).

This reaching of goals attitude, continually changing, as you know I don't like condemnations, can be seen as the fundamental goals chart of reality, that will work along the fundamental right chart of reality. The best is if you associate as many aspects of reality as possible to it; judgment and decision activity, work structures and pay ladders, pyramids and schemas, education structure, production too, and all the categorizing. Everything associated globally on the same basis that is a reflection of our fundamental rights. You understand that you simply cannot do that in this reality, where almost everything is a matter of simple competition, even if it ends-up more complex in the end than what I just explained. That's another why I talk about the birthing of a new reality instead of modifying current reality, but I think I exposed more than a hundred arguments why, and I'm not finished.

Just making the basic programming will be a big challenge, and I'm vague, much expertise will be needed, that's why associated expertise and science is so important. We'll want a good science basis and structuring as necessary for the new reality, more associated to a fundamental order. We'll have to invent an association system for that, try to bring together all what we have as facts and science information, all countries, well categorized, under a common language, with a strength of truth factor applied for quicker use, as well as the name of all people involved. We'll want to make a clean, associated, centralized, trustful and growing entity out of the present mess of facts, gaining security and confidence in the simplicity of the data we'll need and get, getting a global view of where science avenues are, like a gigantic folder tree, or whatever the interface, like a 3D matrix web of interrelated development values for an extreme; where different color line length are given a variable, like a value of truth; when you click on it or a node, you have all, where on earth, structures associated to it, people too, and the developing level of it, or its potential, the wants, the pay, sliders and charts, all associated to what is believed as truth, or facts, with an approximate value of belief of what people think of the truth, yes, that profound.

I know it's a big challenge, and you're not finished; everything needed for a new reality will be a big challenge because we'll skip 2000 years of slow development within a few decennia. For now you must see it as a goal, you take all the basic functions of the new reality, you make a tree of priorities and you work toward them until, in 5 years, all the visions got basic working systems. Like a basic association system that will be ready to be fed with data. As I already said, this database will be noted with truth value and all associated names, particularly for science findings, from which everything spring forth, and that includes people, even mathematic formulas. But you won't have that at first, it's is not the top priority since the amount of work to do just for associating is already tremendous, but a quick percentage as things are systemized is already a good start; making the system of association, the tool, is the priority. The reality philosophy is not based on final truth competition; it is based on possibilities strength, probabilities, their associations and their conflicts. Eventually, an A&D group (more later) can apply a value of credibility too.

As for the interface complexity, we're better working to create the simplest and most efficient of interface right at the start, but entirely open to complexity potential, so data security must be an intrinsic part of the data circulation system, not as a price both monetary and in performance and ease of use to the end user (even if the end user can still chose whatever level of security he wants on his computer), I mean, the system is supposed to check its data, this whole antivirus and programming is a reflection of either incompetence or downright profiting from innocence or ignorance, and the price is fantastic. There is a door to my computer, and it's called this wire or this antenna, make the fucking door secure and be done with it, sometime I do conspiracy theorizing when I dare think it's all done on purpose, so evil can always find a way to infiltrate... worthless complexities except as a puzzle, wasted time, performance, electricity, more chip and parts production, resources exploitation, pollution, plant a nuclear reactor in the name of all what it cost to humanity...

Everything as visual as possible, and that applies to the interface used to fill the databases, that's the priority, but people will develop other crazy interfaces with time. And you got to get rid of charlatans and profiteers too, remove useless mirrors and fumes effects, do we need all these magazines to communicate our stuff? A lot is to submerge us in crap for profits I say. We'll create new sciences and eliminate some too, we can have a new science in reality change possibilities, categorizing developing avenues and windows as other sciences advance, or a new science in alternative systematizations of human life energy (time).

Associating science as a trustable database will be a big contract, but having machines and computers designed for the life reality should help greatly. Not killing machines, efficiency machines, reality transformation machines, machines to make people feel better too (reality). For now science can change their priorities a little, and governments can help by removing bad science, limiting war, spend to reduce pollution, clean, recycle, control profiting industries that pollute for money, etc. And people should be given better means to use what science know and help clean this mess, let life try to get back some comfort. If things can't be recuperated, then more drastic measures may be taken, we got to stop the environment degradation process immediately.

We should be more careful with life and the planet for a while. For us, since we build the reality from life principles, life will be one of our first emphasis because life systems are slow. We'll have tremendous structuring to achieve within life, so we'll want the truth and expertise for it first and we'll be happy if father reality developed that much technology we'll need. So we can give life a break, let it cope with what we threw at it in the last 50 years, make an emphasis on making sure things are allright with it and the planet. And I know I'm a redundant critic about science, but it is indispensable to everything we are in any reality, they're just humans like everybody else and prone to the same failings, they are not "gods" and they are far from superior. And that applies to psy science; it's not because I kicked them a little hard that they are worthless, they are critical, the same for pharmaceutical science if you don't want to lose your painkillers and Viagra, it's just that their goal won't be max profits within the law. I'll add, for people who think it can't be possible to make such an associated knowledge database, that humanity have no choice to do it one way or the other; when we'll start living far away from the earth, you'll need to carry the best content of true information you can, unless you consider waiting a few years each time you Google something to be a better alternative...Some will say quantum mechanics will make that problem irrelevant, but you don't you know the limitations, and you're still better with a content of information. Hopeful people got this tendency to project wild speculation from thing that end-up barely enough to enhance dildos, maybe you should make a kind of antenna to detect extraterrestrial quantum babbling, but be careful not to blow your mind when you press the go button, you'll get it all simultaneously... I bet you can't intercept no shit because it's a law or something (the difference between a principle and a law, ideological? Principles move and grow people of understanding while laws are more for brain incomplete hive people of hierarchy and authority, the difference between working with independence and good initiative (the ultimate example would be me), or needing to be bossed around like a stupid robot that's attracted by anything shiny, or what that other bugged robot said, as we discuss stupid fashion like a bunch of homosexuals... I'm just extrapolating stuff, but really, do you?), personally the way I see hell, I'd say it will be there to make you taste something out of your reach, a bit like fusion, everything is so glory, but in the end the benefits are marginal, or some hurdle makes it impractical, but it show what kind of forces a human is capable of dealing with, and we must do it, the same for alternative systems btw, just saying, could be a fluke, but I don't think so... It's time to start thinking of these things, and it will have to show somewhere that we are capable of taking the attitude and means to have what it takes to succeed, and even if it's just to show we could have succeeded, that's better than nothing...

Associated (centralized) knowledge means everything, tremendous spending has been invested in mining exploration so we'll systemize their data; geology must be associated with science too, to have a maximum of interrelated factors. I have the right to any knowledge, and I don't give a shit about your competition environment (like for money) that limits my development; knowledge must be free and accessible at the technological level available to governing structures, any other vision is pure evil, whatever the advantage against whatever other competitor, we're not in a game we are in a precarious universal situation and we'll be better off associated with the most advantages we can gain, including good and evil mechanics, but that should come naturally from people developing social competence as they grow up, it has nothing to do at the mass level, in fact it is where we fight evil (it doesn't mean you have the right to do despicable actions everybody despise, often even those doing them, everything is proportional, and that's where a police is appropriate, and strategies of punishment, if you can't heed sense. I often find it incredibly fitting that the line between choosing a path of understanding and one where you use your brain to become and remain downright stupid, why, I mean why are we not all born around bright or stupid? I think it's because stupid don't survive, so it's like the cream of the bunch that permit survival by its thinking or strength, and then it becomes a drag, like a slavery thing inversed in hell, gremlins laugh, drink booze, make porn, and use the efforts of thinking people against them, and they must take it affectuously, just because everything is a game for competitive morons. So I bust my head in four to really comprehend, as one that truly cares, but I'm not sure I should still care about this bunch that not only don't respect me, but do everything to make me fail, because the god of morons is entropy. To make matter worse I'll blame myself for not believing the extent thing can slip, only to wake up a baby in front of a humanity of billions having an open legs party, surprise! Everybody is getting himself fucked, common! I'm overwhelmed, that's way too much education to do...So bad feelings develop, and when stupid overtakes, everything fails in inadequate priorities. Sorry man, don't be surprised at your reward, as I part ways for a place you'll never go...In the end the problem is again unavoidable, because we're not born intelligent, and that applies to all aspects of it, and that's why someone that has the knowledge and attitude to develop most aspects well will see these as deficiencies in others, which they are in part from inadequate education for most, but life grew intelligence from nothing. Again it's an ideological contortion since it is inversed to the ego ideal vision that god popped intelligence; the good vision is that we as the ultimate development of life here, and we are growing our own intelligence by how we deal with it.

The same with medicine, it's part of science too, everything is; even if I think a slowdown in life pollution with molecules is in order, the cumulated knowledge must be preserved and further developed in potential, it is unbelievably expensive and valuable, and since these molecules are everywhere, they must be globally ordered with all known interrelations. The same for all those industrials and pharmaceutials and genetisists, the head on the log for geneticists, all hiding secrets for their profitability competition, the same with pub, it must be categorized in complexity, the same with movies and music and all.

But such an association level is costly to produce, particularly for a final reality not made from and for it, so presently you would be condemned to start by leadership association; you got to work with the pyramids, the image leadership is not the government, which is composed of many parts and must be seen as a business, the democracy capitalism business at the mercy of rich conglomerates and their lobbyists, but things must still start from up, god ideologically, pushing associative power on structures to bring everything together. Evidently, taking money off the rich can greatly help, but there's a risk; they could cry that their standard of living has lowered! Like you're be putting them in a worse situation than mine...

With this database, you'll have an ordered, mobile, efficient, transferable and associable, centralized memory structure of knowledge along tremendous power you can canalize for possibilities. Add to that the fact you'll have a big mind momentum in the associated expertise because of the job, which will be very useful to carry on immediately to big and lasting projects. All this association of structuring, people and knowledge will permit better creation potential and efficiency in a saner environment because competition will mostly be limited to entertainment and fun; we won't send design specifications to another competing country that may implant a hidden flaw or cheap chemical; we'll all be associated friends working together without passports, and we'll all have a country to develop independent societies. And yes, there will always be some racism and hate, but it won't be at reality level from ego-gods ideology country competition, it will be at the personal level, mainly, even if some gangs will still hate each other, and that's not necessarily bad, even some PMBBD is not necessarily bad, it's the level or exaggeration that is, and that's why there are better spheres to express it, or levels; the most evil is done at the mass level...

Competition has a tendency to grow hate, that's why the best place for it is entertainment and sports, all in all: not serious fun, and that's why I like violent games, movies, hockey... Those television shows where you win an amount of money are good too, those don't make a civilization, they entertain it, they act as a buffer to displace some exaggerated facets developing in people. You can be as ego as you want in games, own the whole galaxy, wipe out all races and be a god, just don't forget they are mainly a challenge of some of your skills. It's like school, you don't want to be a moron, you want to be as good as everybody else with some better facets, so you got to compare, test yourself, but one of these successful steps of learning is that you develop the consciousness to extrapolate and realize the use, that you're not superior except at some skills and the price you pay for those skills make you inferior at other skills in most instances. So you can be superior in games as you have fun all you want, but it's strictly worthless if that's all you do, things like that. There are some entertainment forms that create a level of competition or forms of hate that are acceptable, and even helpful in some facets, to civilization.

Now, we must not forget to be very careful dealing with father reality, it almost brought humanity and mother earth to death, and may even take the decision to do it and never be a father reality thing after all, continuing in its path until people either die en masses to stop it, or simply die out of it. I suppose doing so it will have proved it is the enemy of everything, a blind, deaf and senile thing we had to destroy to stop, a path could end-up as a thousand year setback, and hell may rise again from the dead as a finally invincible zombie, since it thrives on dirty problems like poverty, misery. I know I may be all freaking wrong, but I don't see the future as bright so I try to do something about it, while knowing that the classic options will be forwarded by classic people, I do the special stuff, the other option, the secret one, you know, the one nobody talks about? Where? Who? I still got sufficient trust in humanity's potential at changing things for the better and going through these times successfully, sufficiently enough that you could stash me in the space station for years and I'd feel secure enough not to fear for my survival (just don't booby trap it, and I'll want some quantity of weed and good filters, one pack of cigarettes too, as a souvenir, and a cat and a blonde bimbo...); I trust humanity to keep its industrial, computers, research, or means, whatever it will have to go through.

I'm sure we are among the greatest of this universe, maybe even "the" thing, so if someone got what it takes, it is us, we could be a first at this, but I kind of believe that as much as I believe we're becoming a failure in this reality, quite a problem, as I make the key that will unlock the condemned door of our soul, a door that needs a beautiful key because the power is there, where the beautiful of humanity is imprisoned for profiting. But there could be bloody battles behind that door, there are still lots of lessons to learn, and since it lead to another reality where everything is different, it will take some time for people to feel well and secure, that they are doing good too, and not good in the sense of white saints levitating it around; people are supposed to experience some evil once in a while, just not the overload or pressure or bad taste or systematization kind. Do we need the ugly stuff that stink all around? This reality sure does, it is dependent from it, and it's clear you won't blast the problem, so you patch with cheap popular soup and cheap manipulation spirituality...

So we need another growing reality (as a terrain that expands from fair laws) where everything is different particularly the systematization itself, give people a different set of limitations, goals, priorities and principles, all that supposedly leading to better attitudes, as a kind of wheel of self-help. Once things go well enough we can relax and explore the new possibilities of the environment we created, exploring, building and developing the creativity that arises from it.

One of the big failing, and evident injustice, of ego reality it is that there is no systematization of judgment that dynamically forward problems or requests to the right people under a good form; your judgment is used to vote for a politician that will run the business and force you to a budget that "change" reality and laws, and only politicians with their "ministers" can do it, and that include dealing with the justice system making the laws. You must fight to push a request through a ridiculously laborious and inefficient system of variable steps from place to place that end up judged not, in most cases, by the best or ideal people for it while competition and resistance form. The person that has the final say or power on the matter is not one that is a reflection of the will of most people in most cases, unless there are profits to be made. Concerned people can't express their will justly, efficiently and simply, the only way is to protest peacefully, and such protests do not reflect the opinion of most either, opinion that have not much worth in this reality anyway because the values of the reality itself are twisted all wrong.

The life reality will use vast amounts of intelligence and judgment from concerned mentalities to take a decision instead of the insignificant quantity we have presently, but that doesn't mean that we won't take "bad" decisions, and we'll have to be particularly careful of that at the beginning, and the beginnings of a new reality can take a long time... People will slowly adjust themselves and correct things as people and reality come together, when the base ideological path will have taken form, reality will reflect more and more the true will of the people in their globality as they update their basis and ways. The system will not be made to adapt to hierarchic structures of profits, it will be made to give people a good basis to bring them to find their ideal way, without having it under pressure, without somebody or some gang controlling them or trying to profit from them. We decide together, as a team of individuals, while following logical and spiritual laws that make best sense, individuality which is totally perverted presently. Individuality is a total of things that make everybody different, strongly contributing to the independence of a person. You may have needed and developed a limited and dependent selection, but our reality will seek to develop more independent people.

Both of individuality and independence this reality tries to manipulate in most people as one of its many ways to influence (manipulate, control) them, and it's cool since people surrendering their individuality and independence get the illusion of being less responsible in important things, so instead they'll put a big emphasis on mostly insignificant responsibilities that could be made global or eliminated, like running everywhere to deal your money between profiting factions while understanding the complexity of it and the why you've been had or didn't get what you thought you paid for, or paying bills to profiting institutions that are continually harassing people for more, people to whom they'd gladly cut the power off in the winter if they took the same attitude... that's how pitiful profiteers are (Only under barrel sight do they risk taking the right attitude, to preserve image, but all that lead to too late attitudes, you run things until they don't work anymore, then you may or may not change depending if you got the ability for it, and I'm mainly talking rich businessmen here).

Our system of laws revision will permit to sustain a way of changing things dynamically and fast without hassles from ego gangs everywhere possessing monopoly of judgment over decision spheres for profits, for control, for power, whatever, slowing everything ass backward (forward I mean, wrong side, the ass must be away from sight), where people are under a continual adaptation pressure from those who indirectly decide things in their place (that sounded weird like counter representativeness...) so responsibility disappears in the bottom of the pyramid, displaced in violent actions against wrong targets and where punishment and repercussions of mistakes mostly take place. This is a limitation evidently, even a condemnation since you'll almost only be able to make changes that are harmonized to the reality (I'm not talking about cosmetic, or technology, or production, or entertainment diversity changes; examples used over and over again as proof that things are changing and evolving, I'm talking system, mentalities, laws).

We'll need a system where we can increase or exercise our understanding, consciousness, and judgment by deciding as much as we want on subjects that we like, where we can submit our requests, opinions and arguments. This will remove the need for current ways of governments, and banks, controlling conglomerates, all those possessing judgment over production or money flow etc, are out. All in all, it will eliminate ego and gods from running things and profiting from people in all kind of ways. But it won't be an easy explanation, or an easy thing to do, yet, you can understand that the value of succeeding is unbelievable.

I don't want to decide for people and I don't want someone else deciding my things, particularly deciding to have the right to manipulate me. That is, even if my judgment failed me many times and you'll probably find examples of that in my writings. So, I want to decide things for myself, but I need help for better judgment which I cannot get because people are worse off than me while thinking the contrary, and this lack of structural integrity is reflected by the emptiness of their argumentation and the reality itself that exist to prove where their actions are, for what they really stand and put their life energy in. The actions we make in reality are what defines us; you can say whatever you want against ego people in your dreams, or socialization, but it is worth nothing, it could even be envy! It's the actions that you do that counts, which can be to encourage an ideology of superiority in reality, like paying 100$ to go all emotive before a skill while being oblivious of the evil behind, and that is valid for the ones who act like gods in false humility (you can figure out these attitudes and actions yourself)). This willful ignorance as a form of acceptance of anything unless it comes to your attention is the ideal attitude to let evil reign, all he has to do is provide you a nice picture with fears and difficulties, because you're no good if what you stand for is a fake projection of reality (to protect you from nightmares and questioning if you really want to encourage this crap, oh, and watching the news is normal btw, I forgot to say it for those who tend to extrapolate to extremes, it's not because I threw TV out the window and media manipulators piss me off, that I'm anti-TV or anti news, in fact you would be inadequate not to seek to have news from what's going on around you, even if it's your choice to remain ignorant; whole tribes and sects prefer life that way, particularly if they're sensible to evil (your effect on the life they respect, all the way to your stupid missionaries, to the point that it's become widespread knowledge among the last resisting tribes that missionaries and diplomats should be killed on sight like the plague...That's a form of willful ignorance that I understand and accept, in the name of fighting those manipulators and this reality that is destroying the world, since it doesn't applies anymore to those who sell their soul to the devil... ) It did happen to me though, this reject effect when I'm deceived something is tainted by evil hands, not working as it should, without an understanding that I feel I should have been provided as I grew-up, like I'm cheated of understanding, and the more I explore the more I find it's the case at a great extent for most facets of existence in this reality, telling me that everything is a cheat (like it's really a competition of cheaters, systemized unfairness as intrinsic to the economy is a systemic cheat in itself, and I know nothing and the challenge is so big, and in what do I have faith in again? So I flush it all and grow frustration in willful ignorance, instead of violently exploding against people who will never understand nothing and who have millions of replacements, I don't want to become a source of entertainment for Lucifer and his gremlins. But I tell you I've been living this damm feeling of waiting and worse than wasting my life unless I'm dead, from adolescence, and no end of it in sight (like trusting is condemning myself, so I'm as well hide in a tomb, if I don't want to get entrapped in the machinations of hell one way or another, because in hell you think you got it figured out like a Montrealer (a race apart, the kind where you think you're the navel of the world), but you don't (have it figured out like a Montrealer? In hell no...), between 25 and 30 I was just off, it's where I decided to take the irreversible path of adulthood, stand for my beliefs). Evidently, you know that Lucifer here is just a historical figure like god, one benevolent the other malevolent. As important I should add, and it should be within our literature and talking concerning good and evil, and I would tend to say that if god is everywhere and Lucifer nowhere it's because you're living deceptively in hell, and Lucifer is probably so present that it's within you, to the point that you endorsed the false image he made of god for you, it's perverse isn't it? In your version of good and evil that I play with, not that I really believe in it, and not that I really would want to implant Lucifer everywhere in language too...

Even if today I understand better some facets of dealing with people versus my ideals, and to some extent regret losing all friends to my quest, I know it will always be a chore to get myself well understood and thus always have problems. But I'm mostly creating my stuff while all the argumentation of this world is already written, learned and implanted. That's why I needed to make a decent written basis to have a better idea of where things go with my mind, see my potential (I saw it, nobody else, or not interested...). The last thing I need, in which case I'd never have been able to start writing before 45, are people harassing, controlling or changing my writing or demolishing it totally with their cumulated scientific "facts" or religious beliefs (what can I say, there seems to be true facts and false ones, false true false facts next...) or any other bullshit arguments in the infinite pile this reality made for itself (and the more time advance and the more there are poor arguments to justify any situations, even when those arguments are twisted or contrary to each other (divide and compete to reign in the lands of the gremlin).

Who is interested in decision making when bullshit reign and you're condemned? If people don't want to go beyond choosing a boss to run the business that enslaves them in ignorance happiness, it's because it's wanted like that, even if they'll say the contrary, just open your eyes to the reality you live in, me I don't even vote so much I'm insulted, not only by what I see, but by my life too, and you think I'll want the continuation and amelioration of this hell I'm living? Fuck you and suffer appropriately, someday, continue investing on that...This reality is not what I want, I hate it, and it's not a question of adjusting this or that, it's a soul question.

We will need to provide humanity with what's necessary for it to win back its worth and never lose it again, and for that we'll need a system to go along the strong ideals people will massively want to follow as a general direction, we'll need to arrange things so people decide as a humanity of different people without the need for wars; give humanity the tools to decide what it wants to do and where to go while staying proportional to concerned people's scale. What concerns humanity is decided by a true reflection of humanity, not a "representative" joke, full of "corrupt" (liars and stealers and cheaters) politicians manipulators who dream of fame or money; what form humanity cannot be stolen from it or directed for someone's or some gang's personal view.

Many people have diverted this ability to a kind of competition to choose a track of thinking like a fashion (an existing way in the reality) and they hang to it like bullshit is their most prized possession, often blindly. They have become the system, they're everything with it, no way to argue, as much as they're nothing without it, that's why all I hear is background parrot noise, people know how to imitate and how to talk, they don't seems to understand what they talk about by their actions though, and they're barely intelligible in their argumentation, I mean, it doesn't make much sense and the language is twisted wrong...It's a bit hard as a parody but it sometimes look like it to me, when I see how people let themselves be manipulated by this reality (specific, the selection that goes with the system, they made themselves out of reach of anything else, so it's surely not me that will have an effect whatever I become manipulator supreme or not...Condemned self-accepted slaves that are condemning life to failure along themselves by closing its door to light as they sing love and liberty, they confounded independence for colorful diversity, they abandoned their judgment in serious matters for the illusion that they take their responsibility by ruining to the vote machine when asked, and they think evil is those who refuse to vote for their hell of condescending ignorant happiness...The result of all this creates, in the long run, more long term stable conflicts in our heads (Mostly reality related conflicts too difficult to "settle" in that mind; and they can stay a whole life, creating displacement effects and twists) and those are energy hungry and life condemning...).

I decided things where and when I needed help, taking some wrong decisions, and this reality decide things when it want or need it for itself (mostly) without a word from me. The way I see deciding is globally as much as individually. I'm supposed to be born in life deciding nothing or only stupid things, like throwing a frog on the roof to see if it got the brains to understand gravity (not even a tentative at exploring, straight down on the belly, I don't remember if it survived though. So what does a frog do when it sees a cliff? Jump? Maybe the sun blinds them, but I prefer to see such a suicide as related to human contact; many animals do this if they are not safe in their natural environment. The stress of being manipulated like insignificances by humans may cause senseless reactions, think how traumatic it is to be grabbed by a leg by something you don't understand, then being shot a syringe or being tagged for years, your judgment may fail, like people manipulated by governments, media institutions or religions, when you bow to them without enough questioning, the pile is too overwhelming, your attitude change, and we may all go down a cliff as a result, or do anything stupid from lack of judgment, like spotting the Antichrist, as we end the world while thinking we're saving it from the thing...Now, I don't want to compare us to animals too much, but this change of attitude from being manipulated may apply to all animals that we manipulate or even observe or film, only a feeling is sufficient to change an action, and that makes of a lot of sciences and psychology based on observing animal behaviors very touchy on the methodology, particularly when the goal is some sort of competitive advantage.

To go back to my things, I'll say that the older I grow, the more I want and can decide for myself and the more I want to decide in things that can be positive for many people. I consider my present level of deciding to be the one of a child playing with his toys and pointing at which parent he likes most when asked, competition oblige.

I want to decide proportionally more as I grow older, but I definitively don't want to pass my time deciding because the more understanding and consciousness grows, the more we are continually overflowed or harassed or split by the underlying complexities of our decisions and the more difficult they are to take, until you come to grow far older. That's another reason why writing all this before its time was a good idea, even if it was ugly; writing practices decision making, understanding and consciousness developing. I wouldn't want to start this book at 40, it would take me 15 years to write, it would have more than 3000 pages and I would surely fail. I have to write this now, while I'm young, still with some candor and testosterone, my ideals less constrained by time (I will better work with big arguments, judgments and decisions if I know time is on my side), and a personal quantity of willpower I can canalize to a project I can still carry while being young, but that risk sounding silly, even to myself, in the future; yes, that could happen.

So, I'm not "god" and I don't want "gods" to decide for me, I prefer to take a chance with my limited judgment and risk dying than to listen blindly. The only times I should let my judgment or deciding value in the hands of others is through critical, timed, job or growth actions or if a decision is taken by a quantity of people that can be affected by my actions. So, you can have a hundred experts working in different spheres taking a decision about miners on the moon, if they don't reach it with the people on the moon itself, and not only the bosses, their decisions will always be, at the best, a suggestion or an imposed order from someone made gentle, which, from the point of view of me as a miner, may as well be from "god", whatever I'm minimally comfortable or satisfied of the decision.

My definition of a successful decision concerning people involve all concerned by it, if it is not the case, or if too much PMBBD have been used, it is not a valid decision, and it will always take the form of an imposition of a certain level. All type of leadership have a more appropriate place and epoch, and now we'll need to update that or we'll lose our minds. As a loner you can have an idea of what your girlfriend like or dislike and try deciding things for her in some instances, you can do that with a few people but not with millions, even if they tell you to decide everything in their place (I would decide to "teach" or "force" them to decide and I'd drop those that don't want to do it on an island, I hate self accepted slaves as much as I hate ego gods). The same for selection, it is one thing to do it from love with your girlfriend and it's another to select scientifically and for profitability a precise bee that will overwhelm all the others to the point of composing a crushing majority of all the bees, that's one thing to have a visual pyramidal pay system at work, a hierarchy with a superior, and it's another to have a whole pyramidal civilization, the examples are many.

Yet, your girlfriend will always have the right to the last word if you decided something without her input, that's the trade, that way you won't buy a car thinking she should be happy about it...and if she's not, try to use PMBBD to make her happy about it. So for me, all these libraries loaded with books of laws are good for the burning (if they have no historical worth), it is worthless counterproductive and inefficient spending of people's life energy (time), we paid a bunch of people who didn't take a true decision for the people, but the best they saw in their expertise group, and probably mainly decided from profit competition. Then more competition, science and media PMBBD formed the population to tolerance, acceptance; pressure selection, giligilgily. For that reason, there is not a single valid human law in existence in my opinion, even if many are logical, good or make sense, so I'm very dangerous, I'm lawless, but am I? I have many principles defining my rights, how I should behave, and who or what is good and evil, and I seems to not to piss the police off too much with my actions...

Now, what if I'm unhappy because I feel cheated in the development and expression of many skills? It is the way of this reality, so what can be done with me? I must accept things as they are? Protest a little on an intra-reality subject where I can pass on television while having fun? Maybe I'm the carrier of an extreme skill (not developed or encouraged in this reality) and because of it I will always prefer death than not having my word to say. I don't want to become an intelligent and skillful animal you try to entertain or forget in front of a screen with pretty or boosted images or calming expertise and smiles upon smiles upon smiles, and a pope! With a compensation and displacement effect to seek a show of violence, drama or misery, besides; I'm not entertainment dependent. The main reason for me writing and dreaming (in too many colors; I know...) about another reality comes from feeling like I can't take my human responsibilities on earth, it's one of the many hole this reality made in my soul, that I had to heal with understanding.

Who decide mining and exploiting? This industrial or that doing a secret job nobody understands, from this country or that offering an unfair advantage in some regulations or having devaluated money, along with a market system that is emotionally manipulable. People concerned are supposed to decide these things, and when a resource is limited and used by everybody, then everybody has its say. The only thing people need is an easy way to do it, almost like conversation, and a dedicated adequate expertise group associated to the question, to better develop arguments.

Think of what we could have accomplished with a good decision system based on age proportionality and specificities where propaganda money doesn't have the right to influence vote, where facts are truth, and where the means are within realistic reach, you'd have skipped most wars, the world trade would be still standing, I wonder how back we can go, no irak war, maybe ancient grease? They say democracy was something big, in movies and documentaries at least, so we could have skipped all the king and princess thing, the dark ages when everybody was either a Christian or evil. Country delimitations would be very different too, if instead of spending their energy fighting it out like bitches the French king and the English monarch decided to make a jointed colonization effort to take the biggest piece of land possible, at the cost of some badly tempered tribes evidently, and separate the territory in 2 pieces, instead of spending military in battle, the means would have been available for guarding the borders, and instead of a massacre of French civilians and villages, they'd be immediately available for a spreading effort. We don't even have to be one country!

Controlling groups, exploiters, governments, money stashers and growers, all those and more will be replaced by argument and decision (A&D) groups. See it like a pyramid where each brick is a specialized A&D group. The base is formed of mostly local or cultural A&D groups of younger or less experienced people, those basis A&D groups will deal with local or cultural decisions (each culture develops its own A&D groups dealing with cultural matters, like an A&D group dealing with criminal matters, etc, there as many A&D groups as necessary, divided in as many specialties as necessary for better efficiency). The top brick of the pyramid is the A&D group dealing with the most important subjects concerning the most people, planetary matters; it is formed of top expertise of older experienced people.

Those groups are somewhat composed of twelve people, 6 men and 6 women, half picked randomly from anybody who wants the job in the group's district or subject, and half from expertise exigencies on the subject. After 4 year of doing it, 4 of them, 2 willing men and 2 women, or whoever if no such consensus exists, will be picked by the population to go work on a more specialized A&D group, while 4 others 2 men and 2 women will continue on the same group. 2 other among the remaining 4, 1 men and 1 women, will be released and replaced by random picking in the group's district or subject, the 2 other from exigencies (whatever the scenario, you may need more people in a higher A&D, or someone quit, you can take those 2 and pick 2 new) . Anybody can quit, forever, and be replaced. Now, what I provide is the vision, the numbers or complexity can be changed as problems arise, you understand the vision? Do you think it can work? It's worth trillions of dollars making it work! I'm joking, far more than that actually...Every member of a group is on medium pay, (unless nobody wants to do the job) and those who stay will get a small increase in pay every year. The ladder of pay will mainly depend to which level of specialization or competence an A&D person climbs to; the more need for specialization or the more important the group, the higher the pay. Random picking is limited to lower levels of specialty, there are many of these specialties (bricks forming the lower levels) and random picking will give a chance to any willing person to experience the responsibility of such influence levels. People who like it and are good can "naturally" get to any level, but it is not them that decide. Any demission is accepted and a replacement quickly found.

And yes they will be powerful, but they'll be specific and they won't grow their ego between themselves except in a complimentary and "reelection" way. Their decision power will be strictly limited to 50% of judgment value as absolute immutable law, by the way things work if you prefer. The remaining power is in the hands of people. Such power is already disproportionate versus people, but they are experts and heavy action judging people; they have that power because it is their job, their responsibility. See this decision power as voting, the value of a vote is divided by 2, A&D people (evolution of politicians) decide one part, or half the vote, and the population, or those concerned by a subject, decide the other parts, or half. As for the disproportion I was talking about, understand that half the result is decided by 12 people while the other half is decided by any funky number of people who are concerned by the subject and want to vote, can be anything from a thousand to billions...But, as I already said, it's their job, they are expert at that, paid for it. As to the why, you'll read about it a little later.

Except maybe for very high-level expertise A&D, such groups will stay limited in size, maybe around 12 members, for easier follow-up and access by people. If there is too much work for a group, you duplicate it or specialize it. I call them argument and decision (A&D) group because it will be their job; they will build decisions trees and arguments trees by any means necessary that make sense, to help a judgment process that people must do to reach a decision. They will write-down those arguments, often sent by people, in their best form, on a computer interface and they will immediately reach a certain number of decisions. Top A&D groups will have availability to top expertise, and people will trust their decisions since they will probably be harder to make decisions of well-known people, that's why we'll need older people more used to the process and with more pointed expertise.

Every member of the group has one vote by step in the decision pyramid (or tree, or schema), the top brick is the final decision, while all the other bricks are a decomposition of it; you place the top brick (reach the final decision), by first deciding the placement of all the other bricks (decide the form of everything, the final decision may be about building a supermarket or not, but there are all kind of possible variations that could better please people, thus increasing the potential for the final decision to be a yes, and not only that but you'll have a yes this way or that, or no because of this or that, precisely, the finger straight on the why without further hassle, unless you decide to give it another run...). Some decisions may be simple yes-no things, but some other may be very complex and require many other decisions to be taken first. It is a goal of the argument and decision (A&D) group to be efficient in taking good decisions quickly. You understand that you have as many A&D groups as necessary, at whatever level of decision, you can have an A&D group that specializes in the people satisfaction in the decision reaching process itself, that way, too complex or not complex enough decision trees can be exposed and experience will be gained at making them better, just don't forget that most members of specialized A&D groups are voted for; if they are incompetent at building good decision trees, then they'll be out. Evidently, such a job will be learned at school too, and as time goes on, there will exist "blueprints" of decision trees concerning almost any situation.

So don't limit your imagination, there currently exist nothing like what I just described, but just this little beginning of an explanation completely changes everything, think about the possibilities, think of all the places where you could use an A&D system to decide something. Furthermore, the cost of their existence is variable in function of expertise or competence, you can have cheap or free A&D dealing with any stupid question of taste in entertainment, you can even quickly form A&D groups on the spot and register them immediately on any computer, there are no specialized device, they just need to access the reality interface (the site), then go to the A&D tab, type-in their password and start working, everything live, as those concerned interact, doing so transmitting their arguments to the A&D group which will associate those arguments at the right place if they are valid. And I said those concerned, you cannot take a decision concerning your neighbor if he doesn't know, but that shouldn't happen since from the moment the new subject is open as a file it is categorized. So the guy at home will have a category of ongoing decision activity that could influence his life, it is his choice to be interested in the subject or not.

So what are the 2 jobs of an A&D person? Argument & Decision. They decompose a problem, or project, or request, as a schema of decision to be taken and associate any valid argument defending or attacking a point at the right place so people can see, and for this job they can use any help (free) available in the world, or none, but you won't last long if you're incompetent. Their other job is to vote like everybody else, except they are forced to do it at every decision step of the subject they deal with.

The end result of a decision is supposed to affect reality. Local or cultural A&D groups will be assigned a local space somewhat proportional to population. Anything local concerning what happens in those "districts" or cultural "bubbles" gets forwarded to that A&D group for a decision by the request receiving A&D group. This one is in the same "district" and decides distribution of A&D jobs based on more global A&D groups decisions, and many other factors. This effect of "serving" a local area, or group of people, will be a basis on which A&D groups will be born. There will be a request receiving A&D group by "district" and culture and all kind of different "specialist" A&D groups taking care of different subjects (a specialist is a "normal" person with a more developed valuable skill or skills, their skills must be used, they exist for this reason and they are a big factor in the necessity to have multi layered "ladders" or "pyramids" of pay or advantages).

Now, I'll give some examples of situations that could happen to describe in another way how things would work. There are a few people who want to start a research project to make new eyes for people who lost theirs. They'd write a request explaining why they wants to do this with as many arguments and description as possible, the more creativity the better for them and reality. But, like for any serious project, their potential for success will be far greater if they uploads a whole complete description of the project in all its facets.

The request will be forwarded to their local request receiving A&D group; they will test the validity and recievability of the request by doing a search (in part to know if there is not already such a project under way, or to know if the knowledge already exist, and that job is the job of the one sending the request too since it could devaluate his work greatly) then they'll take a few basic decision that will accelerate things (deciding if it is a local request is one of these). So, upon receiving the request and finding it makes minimal sense, they'll start the process by giving it a file title like: "lost eyes" with a small description. This is the subject.

From now on, everything concerning this subject will be saved in a computer file, categorized, stastitified, associated and made revisable; it will become a living thing because it affects life. We are creating the working of the brains of the reality. There can be many categories in which a request for a decision can be put in, depending on who is affected, but when everybody has to spend some credits for it, then it is a global request for a decision.

The job of the first group that receives this request will be to quickly judge and decide to forward the request to a more appropriate A&D group (the request receiving A&D group separates contracts, and, if it decides it appropriate, like in a situation where an A&D group got too much of a workload, it can redirect requests to A&D groups that have nothing to do with the subject but who can work on the request if there is not much risk of a bad judgment, but if the workload is constantly too much you need to either duplicate the A&D group or specialize it, and adjusting workloads, if it is well done, will contribute to this specialization process while increasing efficiency; you don't want A&D groups doing nothing). They'll decide by finding arguments and writing them on the "net". For this simple decision, they'll just expose a few powerful arguments and vote. Now, you have "lost eyes" voted 8 to 4 to be a global request, with an attached button to see the why (arguments). People can pass this decision if they are not interested, but they have the opportunity to read the arguments and help the decision process, even this early in the process, and even if there is no deciding to be made anymore about that decision (which A&D group gets the request). The arguments here will look something like this (no need for complex arguments and sub-arguments at this point):

-Losing your eyes is such a bad luck and bad luck is compensated reality wide (to some extent, if you remember how I see good and bad luck.)

-Everybody will have to accept some credits in the bottle will be used for building the research and production structure and service giving.

-Research is knowledge and concerns everybody.

Those three arguments are enough at this point to know it is not a local or cultural society request (local A&D groups take decisions concerning their area specifically). The request receiving A&D group will have already taken that decision but people will still be able to confirm or invalidate it through a permanent and continual opinion pool attached to the file. They can invalidate it right away, or, with enough arguments, make it a cultural thing.

The interface will show it like that; "lost eyes" voted 8 to 4 to be a global request, is it a good decision? You can push a "yes" or "no" button (or whatever simple neutral alternative to the yes-no psychological bias question that can be exposed at the beginning of the request, but I'll describe an alternative where the only button is "accept", when it decides to appear, and you don't make it so by pushing yes no, or by writing stuff...). Everything will end-up with the button "confirm" anyway, which will send your opinion to a computer that will take care of math and statistics. If the pool decision goes in majority toward the decision already taken by the A&D group, then the decision is accepted or reinforced. But no need for it at this point as this decision is too easy.

So, while the request is forwarded to a more appropriate A&D group which will develop the decision "pyramid", people can still vote on past decisions, more than that, they can always go back to any decision to tell, or even modify, their opinion. But more on that a little later.

Coincidence, remember the last time I said "But more on that a little later."? 2 pages before this one, where I talked about the vote disproportion. The A&D is 50% of the decision and the population is 50% too, and each will use the same 2 options voting interface. Simple voting is the first option, and for some novelty I'll introduce you to another totally cool concept like A&D, this one about voting, and like A&D, it will be far better than anything ever invented in the history of this reality, and like A&D it makes total sense! Call it argument vote. So option 2 will permit people to use a different way of telling their opinion, this time through arguments value. This will be slightly more complex as your vote will take the form of a percentage to be applied to arguments (like those above) that have the most importance to you. When you push the button "argument vote", a slider will appear besides every arguments, and you'll move these slider to say what is important to you, giving value to precise arguments. These sliders divide your vote between arguments, beforehand attached to the appropriate decision, and then it's a matter of getting over 51% of your vote toward a decision (at 50% the button "confirm" is grayed out). If there are four arguments, the value of your vote will be separated between the four of them; if you lock 80% of the value of your vote for one argument, the remaining 20% will have to be separated between the three others. This is, in my opinion, the best way to give value to your opinion as your vote is more complex and contains critically useful information (what is more important to you, you give value to arguments, they don't have a preset value). You can add another way of telling your opinion if you want, but it better be good. Evidently, this information is not perfect, and idiosyncrasies can be a problem, and it will give lots of work to the computer and it will be hard to program the thing well in the beginning, but don't think that the basic concept couldn't work without computers, or that I'm the only person in the history of humanity to deduct such an option, or am I? If so I'm really scared, think of all the insane complex and crazy plans and inventions people can make, you even got people like Einstein! And nobody ever invented something like A&D? Or something like argument vote? I guess that capacity of our mind is completely closed or dead, a hole there.
Next, even if you can change your vote once (more later), remember that you have only one vote by decision to be taken so choose well; simple vote or argument vote? So, if after some time people have cumulated a majority of "votes" saying "no" it was not a good decision to see this project as a reality wide thing, then that decision must be revised, backtracked, modified or cancelled. The goal is to score more than 100 points (can be increased for some decisions, as a possibility, but I wouldn't go beyond 120) toward a decision; the judgment group A&D decide 50%, the people 50%, adding them you must reach 100 for the request to get a go. So, to reach a decision you got to have harmony between the two judgment entities; the A&D group cannot decide, even if they reach the end decision while people are still deciding old steps, neither the population; you need two of them, the population associated to A&D expertise, to reach a decision. You understand that the value of an A&D group member vote, in his sphere of work, is a lot bigger compared to any other, but they are paid experts with a pressure to perform, and they do more than just vote, they're the system itself, they're the powerful people...

That's the ideal scenario, but in reality, things will work slightly differently in the name of efficiency and to not make deciding a never ending laborious thing or crash computers under complexity. This vision is very crude and need a lot of adjusting and perfecting to work well evidently. That's why the first A&D groups will take the easy decisions right away, even if they can be invalidated later, which is not supposed to happens often as these are easy, logical or details, decisions made by supposedly competent judges. But the more critical a decision in the tree is, the more important it is to have the opinion of the concerned people, which they will be able to do one way or the other.

Now, there is another button: "history". This will permit people to look at the decision process for the selected subject globally as much as in detail. Everything in the file "lost eyes" will be exposed (not modifiable), if an anomaly is found a request can be made to the request receiving A&D group. Another use of this feature is to see what actions are associated to any member of the A&D group. Everything a member of the group do in the decision process is tracked, and the appropriate pieces of data concerning the request will be made available in the file too. And no missing or lost links, when such things happen, people get kicked out of reality! Father reality made a reputation of wasting and manipulating history on purpose; we won't do that.

That will give people a way to see who is it they want to keep in the A&D group, change group, or flush at the first opportunity, and it will be done by an A&D decision process with arguments like any other. You may keep a member for any reasons you want; you like his attitude, or he is good at writing arguments well, or he finds important arguments regularly, or he is good at making arguments less complex, or his initial decisions often reflect the will of people or whatever. A&D groups take their decisions by voting the same way as anybody else. Evidently, expertise in such matter will need to become a trade with education specificities needed to take the job, like politicians in this reality, apart from the random members.

Among the people composing the reality, there will surely be a few ones who are interested in new subjects, as much as people watching or reading the news I guess, new subjects are always brought about by request receiving A&D groups, so the people will open their judgment interface which will show different main "classes" like Health, Criminality, Education, Entertainment, Lodging, Power, Communication, Transportation, Diplomacy, Law, and you can find many more. If you click on a class, the different A&D groups composing it will appear, the local ones or the global (reality) ones, and there will be a button to track any subject you find interesting, but there will be many ways you can use to select those. You may want to know what's brewing locally or you may want to know what a specific argument group is working on, or you may want to continue following a previous subject, or you may want to know what are the current priorities of the reality where judgment is more of a priority, whatever; you'll have all kind of ways to personalize or categorize or specify in which sphere you want to express your judgment.

For now, someone opens his interface and look at what's new globally which is brought about by the concerned A&D groups. In today's new stuff, among other things like "2040's second murder" is "Lost eyes". The small description attracts the attention of some people who will click on it. A few decisions have already been taken like the priority of the subject, what argument group will do the job of reaching a decision. The Request receiving A&D group did that step, they found arguments and made them as simple and short as possible, then took those first decisions quickly to efficiently forward the request to the appropriate group while people are still confirming these decisions through their interface when they have time until representativeness is reached.

There are arguments that will come from the request, from the people composing the A&D groups, and from the people's suggestions; they are all forwarded to the A&D group possessing the request. Eventually we'll have most major arguments exposed with, attached to them, under-arguments (not voted on) and the percentage value each of the member applied to them to reach their decision. This will make it easier for people, after a few years, to have an idea of whom they want to keep as members of A&D groups (everything is statified and charted and available to everybody, and people will see live how A&D works, they'll exchange like in the news, or more appropriately like a bunch of politicians in the news, only there won't be much competition or bitching there...they can work the way they want but under work time they are recorded one way or the other..).

Many decisions will have "checking cases" parameters and options attached to them too, they will mainly be used to accelerate decisions and decide details, like selecting the color of the building or select modifications with the associated costs. And this is used in appropriate voting structures like those first decisions of who is concerned, how many people of what age group etc, accelerating consensus. People will be able to ask for these options, but they will mainly be brought by the A&D group and the one making the request.

Classes of A&D groups have many very important uses apart from categorizing. Most are connected to an independent channel of credits given reality wide as a basis of comfort, meaning everybody will have a minimal weekly or monthly amount they can spend as a basis, for sports, food, entertainment and whatever, surplus is paid by you; but more on that later.

Now, everything is in the how we'll give the votes. One thing that is necessary is to have one vote available to anybody concerned by a decision step, and another one since people will need a protest free way to express a change of opinion, one that can have an effect by the simple fact of expressing it, so it must be intrinsic to an ongoing process of modification which may realistically lead to a forced revision or change of this aspect of reality, yes we do that, we're a dynamic and young reality remember? The computer will accept only one vote though, meaning that you use a vote to help a decision from either pool or argument, and you'll have the option of changing your vote, anytime and forever unless a revision is initiated, then the process is restarted with the old data as a base of knowledge. If argument vote works well in simulation, I think "pool" (yes-no) should become a quick one shot option, quick vote, more appropriate to some decision steps and personalities, absolutely not pejoratively, totally acceptable if used by serious people, it's just that spamming doesn't show much judgment... I see nothing wrong if simple decisions are limited to quick vote, you can even make quick vote the default, and when it slips under the bar you have set for the importance of the subject, the decision falls under argument vote or requires complexification. I'm just exposing options, the ideal to me is to tend for a maximum of argument vote, but these options can help alleviate bottlenecks by emphasizing where you'd prefer thing to go, speed, efficiency, quality, database and algorithms development, because you'll need much data to be sure your assumption are true. The same for the size of the pool that is decided as representing a good judgment base, making it smaller accelerates things, but you lose quality.

Votes are associated to decision steps you are concerned with, they cannot be exchanged or bought and sold, and if I need to explain why, then you didn't understand the most basic message of my work and the reason for another reality, read everything over (which you're supposed to enjoy), no shame, I did many times because I did not understand...

So you'll be able to open any file and spend a vote there on a final decision, this will happens mainly to bring back a file for revision, going through all the decision processes anew. Revisions will be made possible if certain conditions attached to the file are met too (the kind of request mainly dictates the revision parameters but those can be decided too). For the most part, the revision algorithm will be a standard set of laws, but you can always erase or revise an old decision through an accepted request too, so as you can see, nothing is final, any decision can be reversed.

In a sense from the moment of its existence the data becomes variable as people interact with it continually, and if the data end up too far away from the original, or things swayed too far away from the reason why people wanted it, then a forced revision mechanism is initiated, people will be further interested in what's going on between closed doors at the "lost eyes" institute, by looking at the developing data related to it, and they may decide to shut down the place, if the police didn't do it.

Age groups now, an important decision concerning everybody will have to be reached by having a vote proportional to the concerned age categories of the voting people. A decision concerning everybody requires a voting pool representing the best quality of judgment and so the age group will have to represent this. I must put a big emphasis on the difference between all the age groups I talked about through my work, while never forgetting the around principle; they all have specificities and it is very important to associate them well to spheres of judgment that represent them well, it mean there are decisions where the vote should be emphasized for certain age groups, a lot of which should be strictly reserve to assumed adults, 25 or more, I would even make an elder category, I mean between 50 and 70 for the top level of political competence here. While some will argue that that voting should be a free for all like love presently, I side with the best adequate judgment and that's all, and it shouldn't remove anything positive doing it, unless you decided it.

To have our appropriate voter pool we will separate (no divide to reign relations here, don't try...) the population in four age groups; 18 to 24, 24 to 36, 36 to 48 to 69, and over 69 (you can put an "around" principle here to permit cultural differences in such matters). From 18 to 24 your judgment activities will mainly be limited to local or basic decisions categories, that way those younger will practice their judgment skill locally, and the result "should" be to give the reality more of a youth push and look, as youth will always be the future, and that should give them somewhat of a boost at having the future reality they want while growing past 24, in which case they use their judgment watching some results, learn from that and extend or change things more profoundly with their greater understanding and independent consciousness, improving the basics from which the people try their life. That leaves 4 age groups, but I don't like elimination so I would tend to prefer if they had some say, but taken into consideration after the main pool have been decided. If the percentage of the population in those 4 age groups is 20, 18, 15, 12 then, in principle, to reach a decision concerning everybody, you'll have to amass an adequate proportional number of voters. I wouldn't mind leaving it at that, but fairness and frankness here would say that judgment is better served by fully developed adults so I would still put double emphasis there, it must mean something to be an adult, and it will show there, they'll have more value of judgment, more effect on reality, but we want to keep this contained to adults, because they're most strongly connected to the class of people that's following it, leadership. So it's not because older people are senile, quite the contrary in fact, because the the same kind of mentality applies to the topmost area of expertise that is mostly emphasized to elder people, as a stronger link to the age group behind it that's supposed to be doing the babies, leadership. It's all dynamic! So let's say this previous proportional vision, even if acceptable to me, is not the ideal. After you got the numbers figured out, you put a drop of youth to it, they have nothing to do there, but we'll still give them around 1 % representativeness, not to close the door, and to cumulate data, which may be useful to better define our blueprints of age groups, for a start (be careful of hidden influences, changing age or quantity for better judgment, whatever the scientific data, can deteriorate judgment from hidden psychological interplays related to the precise voting situation people are under and by changing it from the suggestions of your cold data you'll fuck the hidden human aspect that developed with time that you don't know your data is dependent from; beware the unconscious tricks of your mind, particularly methodological scientists). If you want a million votes (variable in function of population and number and complexity and level of decisions) from concerned people to reach a decision, then you'll need that million of votes proportional to age groups. You may need two millions votes to have proportionality, but you want one million so those age groups in which you have too much votes will have to be made proportional through random picking. People vote when they want, there is no day of the vote here, a decision is taken when the concerned people reach a predetermined number of voters proportional to age groups. As you can see, this simple and fair concept that makes total sense doesn't even exist yet in this world, and the reason is simply that it would change nothing for more complexity.

A final decision have been taken by one million votes, but to put some trouble in the story we'll say that consensus or majority has not been reached even though the decision can be taken from good judgment and there are always exceptions...We had 55% go from the A&D group, and 44% no go from the population for a result of 99. You can keep it pure and reject the project because it did not reach 100, or you can take more decisions, like deciding to force the project to some modifications for another cycle. Looking at the tangent of things from the beginning, a new decision could be taken to accept the result as a go, but this only available in a situation where you witnessed a constant increase in the number of favorable voters as the decision developed (the contrary is not necessary, don't forget you have 2 options permitting the reversal of a decision). A revision date about the subject could be brought closer too, but that last part is done to some extent by the computer (or somebody) which, as soon as it sees a decision that can be volatile or very important, will categorize that file as such, making it more "sensitive". Now that's without saying that if a project is decided as necessary, but a consensus is not reached at a deciding steps, then the process waits or goes backward until consensus or majority is reached at that step, which may imply the reworking of some facets of the project.

Now, even if the decision is voted and it gets recorded and the work starts, people can forever continue voting on the subject since the file is forever running open. They do it with the specific 1 votes I wrote about earlier, until one day the computer notices there is an accumulation of over one million of votes, proportional to age groups, which have been sent to the file, and the result reached 100 points contrary to the original decision (can happen many years later); that will trigger a request for a revision process where everything will be judged and argumented anew, like a fresh request, and this will happen for those decisions that are timed in advance for a revision too, the process is infinite, meaning nothing is definite. Even if a final decision is taken right through to the visual attractiveness of the development building concerning our request to build "lost eyes". The "GO" decision, even if it look final will never be, as the file represent an aspect of life.

Evidently this is just my simple vision, it may need some adjustments, just watch if something makes things unfair or if a profiteer can infiltrate or if a simpler way can be found, then readjust or reinvent. Don't enforce if things get too laborious, keep the ideal while modifying it so it become more easily usable, like it may not be necessary to involve people in every decision steps, or decisions steps could be replaced by more complete choices of parameters. You could invent a voting buffer too, give people a batch of votes at years end for spending in A&D classes or decisions that may need a boost, A&D groups structure may be modified, an option to give a few credits to voters could exist and be applied to complex requests, all kind of things can be tried or modified, but the main goals are to give easy ways for people to involve themselves in decisions without making a mess, and to have and develop paid weighty expertise to expose arguments with trustable decisions without developing machinations to profit from it.

All the voting actions that you make will be recorded in the file with your name attached; all those actions of modifying your judgment are part of your history so they are recorded, and with a "powerful" search engine you will be able to make fast sweeps through all your previously taken judgment actions. At the extreme, that could be used to see where things are headed, but people will still have the power to "hide" old decisions. Added to that will be a continually upgraded deduction engine to search the decisions of any citizens for clues of bad intents like always deciding "no" or deciding randomly; if you don't want to help this facet of reality, just don't do it, that's all. Personally I'd punish this kind of sabotage with the incapacity to vote for 10 years. Another effect of A&D is that the notion of good and bad actions will exist with less ambivalence by the will of everybody (not some gangs). Add that to the increased value of the people composing our reality and that increases the worth of your actions a lot (you will be more worthy, whatever that means...).

The vortex is there to give notice to people that it's time to revise a law. All its data is available to everybody on the planet, nothing to hide. So this continually absorbing engine keeps stats on everything, like any statistician but in more efficiency, and helps evolution by forcing revision of judgment, from new incoming data, which is a human only thing whatever scientists stuff in computers trying to prove their contrary vision; don't forget that many superior scientists want orgasmic robotic "life" to control, or grow brains in buckets.

However good or bad this simple description may sound, or at whatever length I can describe it (the more I'll add, the bigger the target), you'll have a hard time getting well installed people , and techno "phobic" people, to embark, they'll say we're making a self-omnipotent AI that will make a depression with self-consciousness and kill everybody. Don't be scared from watching too many movies used by some to make you believe computers will start thinking by themselves and take over the world, or develop better understanding or higher consciousness or energy efficiency, or creativity, or whatever. Unless gods or the UI decide to go down earth personal, there will always be a human to program a computer and you can give billions of attributes to a computer to make it a bad robot or a human simulation, but there will always be humans behind doing the programming, and all those tuning tests are just ways to try to fool people into believing they're dealing with an intelligent person, which may be a moron to me that I treat respectfully, games do the same thing and they're far more interesting to me than a tuning test. It is not possible for a machine, a robot, a computer to be bad, only bad intentioned people doing the programming can be. Even a gun is not bad; the people using it may be though. And you can kick, insult, explode, exploit a robot, machine, computer or object you own, except museum stuff that you shouldn't own, or stuff that will affect life negatively. And for scientist gods who dream of making clones or robots or change people's mind with chips, I'd say you are giving the right to everybody to destroy the mind capacities of others. And psy and pharmaceuticals who work so hard to standardize us as a recipe should think about it too. The exception to computing influence is the UI (life god, life systems) but I doubt those can fool around with binary programming, maybe quantum computing if the thing can come to work at a sufficient scale, but even then, things are not in the right dimension for that... Even if they could you'd have to do with it, it's a question of man versus the universe...But let's say they're not in a hurry to mess around with our computers for now, if not you'd have quite a different trade market...And finally, aren't we supposed to be proud of doing things ourselves? We seems to have the right to make the grandest mistakes available...

So, everything is continually changing, nothing is permanent, the central computer is there to force a reflection of change going through the consciousness of a maximum of people, which are humans and continually changing, it is their tool to morph reality, make it dynamic, not final.

Your judgment activity, which is categorized in association with all spheres of society, will be used to have hints of where people's interest are, in all kind of things and at all kind of levels, from secret personal, to reality wide; we got vast and complex lists of priorities and goals with sliders, but we'd do better if we could look more directly at ourselves, make a complex list of what people like more or less, show it to them, that way we can deal better an equilibrium line, or modify things if that's what people want, to change efficiency and spending values. People need mirrors to take care of themselves, and they want to see things they want to see, that's blatantly evident to me, that's a reason why I want a highly graphical interface of civilization systematization, with personal skins. If you want your civilization to know itself, then know where it's going, know what it can change, and do it well, while providing as many reflections for people to see as possible, as live as possible; you don't want to wait for your image to get manipulated, you want it live, it is truer, you don't get a good reflection with lies; neither by hiding truth, and surely not in PMBBD and hype. That's where the powerful controlling gangs of this reality play, by providing a twisted image of the truth of things through medias which are the main way to get a reflection of civilization.

Now there are reflections that we don't like to see, you don't necessarily want to see the face of the bacteria in your nose, zoom and publicize it, just knowing it exists is enough, but you'll prefer to forget about it, not your thing, and you won't like it when those who like it zoom on theirs and make a pub campaign about their right to the liberty of pressuring others to like it. Stupid? You're living in this exact scenario, we've been forced to tolerate tons of things we hate until we accepted these not only as normal, not only as systematizations, but as something we must defend in the name of liberty.

Nobody gives a shit about how I feel in this reality, what I hate, what I want, the reality of my life seems to prove the contrary in fact, people care to give me troubles, with some exceptions, and to further the insult, liberty is used as an argument to force me to tolerate, accept, and adapt to what I hate, hurrah liberty. And I don't say it is abnormal to hate things, I know there is a general consensus different people must accept to live with, I'm talking about choices, I'm talking about human genetic morphing potential, I'm talking about PMBBD, I'm talking about good and evil, if you can't understand then fuck you, I don't give a shit about you, you're nothing, disappear in the name of my liberties.

Another thing not to forget is that, if you've been having a mask on from the beginning you won't recognize yourself when you'll remove it, and some kind of personality clash will happen. That can apply to a civilization that project a contorted image of itself, use PMBBD on itself, manipulate its history; evil better never be faced with the truth... You don't have to see your reflection as a pressure too, even if having ideals is important, but you may want to give more attention to a skin spot or wound or infection, make yourself pretty, or get in a perfectionist bout, nothing wrong with any of this. But we got to prioritize, and there is not always enough time to be perfectionist, except for this reality that took all history to become perfect in itself, or is it invincible?, to guarantee its conclusion, and you won't remove the mask, it will slowly decompose on your face, that way you'll get used to the ugliness under, tolerate it, accept it, peacefully, in "love", until these things too, decompose.

Generally, the more important or global the request for a decision to be taken is, the more specialized or big or older the A&D group, until you come to the top groups which specialize in global equilibrium things only. Those deal with things like pollution, resource exploitation, birth rate and more as a planetary thing, setting visions and goals and limits for fairness critical stuff. Such things are judged by an appropriate, most specialized, global A&D groups, based on older, around 55, more experienced judges selected from the best of other specialized A&D groups. They are very well paid and get the best, almost like ego reality's governments, but always in the optic of the life reality ways, no unfairness and the status luxury they profit from, like sleeping and eating in luxury places as they do their job, must be accounted for in their worth unless they pay from their pockets. A&D people represent the whole structure of reality, so those groups interactions will have to decompose as an exemplary system of fair pay, they represent fairness, judgment, people trust them, and so the maximal exemplary salary of the reality goes to the top A&D groups, they're the north, they set the top limit you can reach in reality.

The top global A&D groups, see them as the reality balance, control and harmonize all research and space development, and they control the sole army which is small but big enough to prevent a gang from doing war machines, that way no can take over, the same for A&D groups in the extremely stupid scenario where one would want to kill everybody or enslave everybody (think about the logistics involved in taking control of a planetary army, how many people dwelling in the secret do you need? And it is not an army meant to wage war, it is an army to control military production, so to make it a sufficiently capable army for taking over the world and impose their ideal, you'd have to ramp up production a thousand time, enroll a million soldiers, redirect billions of dollars, and you think the population will not notice or react? We're not growing zombies here...). Anyway, the most powerful force is the people globally and they will always have access to guns. But...But what if people revolt? I don't think you understand, what is the problem with people revolting? If a vast quantity of people are sufficiently unhappy to attack (which logically can't happen the way things work, but yes there will be unhappy people who may gang-up and do terror actions, but aren't those people supposed to live in the other reality?), then lets go! I don't want to live in a reality where half the people are unhappy, I'll try to do better, destroy it, I'll help you. Legally, those concerned by the subject will decide to unlock the army for use, and like for any decision, A&D is only half the key to unlock its use, meaning it must be impossible for any structure to use an army or war devices without A&D judgment, and there are all kind of easy way that can be done.

Eventually, there will be many A&D groups for all kind of global specializations and cultural groupings specificities, they are our "governments", and we can have many if you compare to how much money father reality need for the running of the Democracy-Capitalism business... Just take the politician facet, politicians are rich in this reality, they have all kind of unfair advantages and are ridiculously costly, there are many millions of them who, all in all, cost more than a million a year to admire. Yes, our politicians will be great, and yes, leadership is always related to a form of admiration, but crappy characters won't profit here, there will be no compromise to the tallness of our leaders, you will want to just respect them as your greatest guides, as it should be in the heart of the good ones of this reality. Great, and the same for our diplomats, they won't be rich "gods" and the likes with their immunity... And our results will be far better at all the good principles forming a civilization too, but I'll need more than A&D to convince people of that... One thing's for sure, we won't grow big egos out of control to control and profit from things, and if they come to visit, they'll find the environment very uncomfortable, like me in their paradise, but I'm bad, they'll be far more comfortable than me...

A&D groups are the judgment and deciding specialization of our reality, and people control them, have their say on absolutely anything that concerns them, and no more fantastically expensive competition that changes nothing. A&D will practices many mind skills in people, easily, and it will give people more what they want while being more conscious of what others want. The simple way to see it is that there will probably be as many A&D people as there are politician and judge gangs in this reality, but they will be far less costly, tremendously more efficient at moving things, and they'll replace a lot of bureaucrats too (who likes bureaucrats anyway?). And to top the torch; people will be directly involved in everything that concern them right down to the decision process. People will have to think and they'll like it, they'll develop their understanding and consciousness and express it simply or as complicatedly as they want, they can even give arguments which will be implemented and, for as long as the file exists, which is forever, the argument will bear their name. If you want to pass your whole life in front of a screen deciding things, you can, and you can do it as fast or as slow as you want.

All this may sound crazy or impractical, but if it is possible we are truly crazy for not trying, but I won't explain the worth of a success at making it work, you'll say I exaggerate. And if you think programming this is too big a job or too hard to do, then I'll say there are many jobs we did for entertainment in this reality that were as hard. Maybe for you it is more a question as to how big the pay will be, or how much you can profit from it. I want people who work by themselves, like me; you drop them somewhere and something good is built when you come back later, that's what good people do, they don't need money to work, good people function well, no food, they grow food, they don't wait to be served or to be guaranteed an advantage, and they should definitively use it as a reminder if you are inconsiderate or if you profit from them (applies to a lot of the elite that should seriously get their ass kicked), because in the end, the fact remains that we always do things for a reason, don't believe the bullshit saying that people just want to contribute, they do for a reason, many reasons, and I will always defend the vision that we are neither made for sacrifice nor to take it all, so a reward system must exist, the money transfer mechanism of reality is supposed to act like an unconscious one, but people shouldn't feel bad having a more prominent one based on gifts. Evidently and as always, everything is probably not precisely perfect in my way of seeing things, adjustments and more thinking may be needed, but you understand what I bring about.

It will be the end of people who pass their life frustrated in silence by those with the worst attitude for an existence, and my opinion will mean something, my judgment has a value socially, as worthy as any powerful person of this reality but it is given nil value, it is worthless, thank to manipulators and profiteers who control everything and thanks to people who have lost the will to care about these things. And you think I'm supposed to write a book to give value to my judgment? It is the systematization of reality that must strive to bring it to people, forever more, or drastically if the governing structure decided not to, for whatever evil reason. I want my say on your G summit, because I have that much value whatever the reality, whatever I sound unusual as an argument to discredit my independent opinion. And if that applies to me, it apply to everybody, that's what fairness means. Again don't think this is brand new stuff, we could have started giving added value to people's opinions long ago, it's just that it wouldn't work in a reality of manipulators hiding and profiting with PMBBD, fucking-up people's judgment and intelligence.1/8

Now I'll write about criminality. Every systematization that form a civilization got elements inappropriate to it, just an evidence, like me that is inappropriate for hell. You have a good idea of what I see as evil, and I say it rampaged the planet long enough. We surely won't let it invade us little by little by playing with good principles like compassion tolerance and such things, forming pressure gangs of defenders using mass PMBBD on everything good until we're in hell. We'll not tolerate evil past the limitations we'll impose to it point. Yes that means we'll tolerate or pardon some evil, mainly at the personal level, but where we draw the line concerning masses is where it stops cold, we will not give it a hint of a chance to spread, get comfortable profiting and creating dependencies.

This reality got its enemies, another reality has different enemies, but I'm not strong on killing (I don't like or want it, but I'm not stupid, and where anger is a killer, revenge is a torturer, and fairness is a tool, to take my responsibility, one I'm definitively not insensible to; if I'm to have my enemies begging on their bloody knees, they'll do so satisfactorily mentally for me). For now I'll give my message, and if you don't care or laugh then all is left to me is to select you out, that's the option for the deaf and neutral, I won't let this earth end in mediocre and incompetent PMBBD hands that accept, tolerate and pardon anything as long as it is said sweetly; you have your reality, you'll go there to self-inflate and that's it, you have no place among people standing for good and sense, yes, standing for something good, we don't want people who stand for nothing good.

We want a good reality or not? Then we surely won't start the reality with prisons and psy to take care of criminals, but we may eventually, in the far away future if people want it. Besides, prisons are not that useful since the rate of successful change of attitude there is the same, probably lower, than what you get in a normal population growing and changing; many of these places worsen people, whatever there are throngs of psy making money there, because those psy don't seems to make the difference between following authority and understanding in the mind, because if they did there would be a lot less prisoners and control and manipulation institutions, it's just that in hell your sole palpable worth is your job, and if you dehumanize people by decapitating them as skills for the marketplace, then don't be surprised if you reap shitty characters as reality changes, because they'll understand all wrong like a pope and their frustration will backfire in evil action and bad attitudes (the pretentious doesn't even understand the shit (deep) situation he's in, for a start...(does pretend to represent the word of god through the existence of the bible, top authority in god matters, which is kind of a big pretention, the bar is high and concerns masses, and a crushing historic presence. I think I'll like it to go watch true history with bunches of popes reconsidering the height of their self-importance...))

Don't forget that whatever the effort you make, the main power is the money circulation, the soul of the people is where the money is, it is the most part of their life energy, so you can say what you want, believe you got it all you want, you'll always develop bad feelings for as long as you sell your soul to the devil. So in prison authority is law, and understanding is mostly limited to make the most of the shitty situation you are in, which is a reflection of something going on reality wide hypocritically too, where authority take the form of manipulation, in big part distributed through its entertainment and media institutions, and it does apply to our strategy of growing (educating) people too, so we're far from done growing people who can't heed sense... And to make thing worthless, this reality doesn't have the minimal political strength ability to close the hole left behind, in fact, it shouldn't because it is a criminal reality! It's normal being a criminal here, seriously, you probably have a mental problem if you're not practicing one crime or the other as pass time! Which makes it hard to know what's the part of what, if only to have a general idea (that's the idea, an ideal is a general direction). If it's normal to be a criminal, if the whole system cheats people, then why build prisons for show and stuff them with pot smokers or Sunday bandits? As a person that's not into extremism and totaliotariism, and as a person of judgment that doesn't let his emotions take the better of himself, except when i'm angry, then don't get me wrong, even if hell is my life metaphor, I definitively don't think everybody is evil in hell. I would say around 15% are really evil people, the rest are unconscious results of a bad reality where most politicians are innocent criminals who need criminality because everybody is interdependent with the same goal; fill its pockets, and any market is good for the economy. This reality is an industry of bandits, and most politicians and bankers and businessmen, are worth prison for the simple means they systemized for themselves, and I'm not talking about their "little" secrets.

Sure that current prisons are not built to make better people, and it's not because politicians like Jean-Chretien don't get incarcerated for their crimes against humanity, (whole societies, by cheating the rules he defend and represent, this guy is a fucking farce and he should have been executed for his traitorous crimes, that's my opinion, which is absolutely unique to me, so leave me alone, it's just me and after death, you decided to think otherwise of him, time have passed, you had your chance to say he was an asshole, you glorified him instead, history is written and made, so leave me to cherish personally this despise I have for this an admired and well defended mass criminal, the same for Jean-Charest, and many more shitty crappy evil politician and their business friends, whatever only me think prisons should be filled with them for their mass effects, and that they need (too late for should) to be given the most exemplary lesson at the height of the most exemplary position they used for their hypocrite crimes (not seen as such), they need to fucking learn to lead people for their best, and if they don't make the difference between good and evil they have absolutely no place there; first test.

And I should not even try to respect this selection for putting this twisted manipulator mouth to power, do you choose evil on purpose? And don't brandish his education and accomplishments and family like a free pass for evil, you'll get it too! Did you elect him for the same kind of reasons you chose a politician because he has cute eyes like a dog? Except it's on the manipulative babbling aspect of things (go babble for us, god...)You know dogs have pitiful eyes because ego ideology people tend to need submitted friends (best friends) who beg and look in pain and are ready to supplicate you for food, our ideology is reflected unconsciously by our selection process in many way, and it is so for this pet we think is our best friend too (whatever the other things having one can bring), it' another level of the same competition mentality, a practice strategy, and a hint of long run intents, envy, fears, it's another sick unconscious reflection of what they want with life, the opinion they have of themselves, so people want to think the ones who are gods are their dog, everything for increased self-esteem, to hide the slavery of their empty souls, and now people have so much pride, self-esteem they know and understand so much they are so creative and particularly good, good, good, they are so much superior to everybody around them that god can only be their pet, it's just logical, they have the unconscious pretention of thinking that they have the competence to dictate god, while this ridiculous vision is an actual proof of the complete perversion of the belief system that led to this insane and senseless result, but life takes the form of the place you made available to it...

So our unconscious response is to bring this to reality when it fits, so the one that's exploited saves more than the appearances, the boss is there to serve them they unconsciously think, some will even put a touch of nonchalance to it, they don't make it easier on purpose, while the ones in top position consciously see these aspects as a maturity thing, so they think the opposite way around about the same conclusion, "those stupid kids are dependent from me, they work for me", with all kind of added benefits, so everybody is happy... I don't know if I'm entirely right, so I suppose you can reject this vision, which you surely won't find in the psy nomenclature, but I say people have become entrapped in a few mentally inadequate turns of mentalities that are reflected all over the place to me, I mean, do I see stuff that people don't? These kind of things can lead humanity and life to its doom, from lack of judgment said simply, which is not only reflected by such insanities, but by our priorities too, from which hell is dependent...

I was saying that prisons arrange people so that they behave acceptable, or time will just calm the person. Next, extremes like Alcatraz, or my despise for some politicians, are not example of how to deal with criminals, I don't think torturing people is a reflection of a good way of thinking or good for mental development, whatever mentally or physically, even my desires for revenge don't produce images of torture. And don't think such places don't exist anymore; it is worse, there are a hundred no better ones all around this best system, hidden and forgotten ones and military ones too like Gwentanamo. I say prisons are for police stations, bigger troubles have nothing to do with being a good citizen, and I'm not talking of small crimes that end-up taking the blunt of the punishing in this reality.

There are two realities, the more advanced one may not be adequate for those who can't control themselves. For a start, the worst ones will be chased out of our reality with guns and small crimes will be given choices. Now, expulsion is not pressure selection for the goal of elimination; we won't hunt them right away if there is a better-suited place for them or where they can build their own ideal, so they'll be given a warning that we don't want to see them anymore. Personally, I don't care what's out there, there must be something, this reality took the whole earth, so they'd still be in it even if we dropped them on an iceberg, and anyway it's the exact system an ego overwhelmed or out of control person need, even if it is predicable they will not want people that can't bring them a profit, but too bad, there can't be two realities of criminals and we need one for good people to live in peace of them. So, if you want to live: get out of here because you'll lose all protection from the system.

Laws will be a globally accepted line of comportment, while the ways to apply these laws will mostly be based on precedents. Now, the complexity, and inefficiency, of the system for criminality is directly proportional to the quantity of out of control ego in the reality. So we can say that in our reality it will be far simpler, maybe even tending toward inexistence, but that would be asking for big troubles...

If you protest over this part, it means you are unconsciously criminal, you like them, and you want them around, you want to be, and probably...you are. Or you are surrounded, or you are twisted senseless in PMBBD acceptance, tolerance, peace, pardon, compassion from your religion, psy or system indoctrination. Would you live in a reality almost without criminality and adequate liberties and priorities? I don't know how many truly would, probably a lot less than I think, a reflection of those who are truly good. So people won't be happy about that big chunk of criminal possibilities I'll slap off their hands right away by saying that there won't be "exploitation" money (physical money that need resources to exist, plastic, paper, steel, cooper, gold, silver and many more with all associated security expertise and industries needed to make it.).

So no money in our reality, Damn! So you're not happy about that one? Not only that, but any transaction will go through an ID check and be written in your file. Ow fuck! My liberties! You can have the liberty to express a number through a million different means, one for each of your gang, if you're stupid enough in your liberties notions, and you can make of all these variations a cultural thing, to condemn humanity to your liberty vision.

As for writing the transaction somewhere; you're already doing it, and for the worst effect, not the best. So a transaction that won't be proven have a big chance to be a criminal one, to a limited extent; we won't stop people exchanging things between themselves or exchanging services, but we won't let evil get away with it, we know where it leads, we will catch you and our police won't make a paranoia about collateral damage, to some extent, they'll still be professionals and careful, but they're the ones that will have a comprehension advantage versus criminality. Meaning that a policeman's parole against a criminal one will be a sure win for police, they'll have more power, and justice will be more clement to them; just prove it was an accident or a mistake and don't repeat. The policeman is important in our reality, they'll be skillful and habile in many things, a greater will to defend reality's ways, their integrity etc, and they'll be well paid too. We'll somewhat copy this reality's functioning for that, just simpler and more efficient while keeping the ratio of wrong decisions very low by the intrinsics of reality.

The price is that if they become criminals, assassinate an evident "innocent", create false proofs, sell drug and things like that, loss of citizenship will be immediate; they are our supreme defenders, even if I don't believe we will need many, we know what an army is for, and we don't want them saving things in our reality. Today there is so much police it is ridiculous, each city got an army, think how out of control we really are, there is as much police as there is military men, probably far more, and when both are taken together, I can make the affirmation that such needs for control is a proof that the reality is an absurd failure, and yes it helps me feel secure...that everything will crap out someday. Like everything that is forever getting better... logic says that a reality that is getting better or successful needs less police and military and less oppression and PMBBD, but there is forever more, so you can make the sensitive and emotive flower all you want, babble until today, hell forces you to cooperate, go get a job to encourage it, bring more people to this earth, you're not making enough to keep the population either stable or increasing...

Apart from half this earth that is now unhappy they won't have that criminal facet to play with, to some extent (Sunday bandits accepted, I'm talking big money and crimes), the elimination of money will rid us of that much polluting industries producing all kind of money, all over the world, and all the tremendous exploitation and dumping of metals that comes with it; we don't need this anymore. And another detail I came to dislike about money is that one side you get a face of some superior rich super publicized ex popular "god", while the other side is very often an animal in nature. I don't like it to see money fall on one side or the other, one in blackness and death, the other in the light, like it's a choice between ego-gods or life. No more of this, who decided this for the whole world anyways? Maybe we can live in harmony after all, gods and life...But how could we reach such a consensus for money all over the earth? It comes with the ideology? Weird.

For drugs having a direct an evident mental effect, alcohol and cannabis will be legal at first, if or when we are successful at somewhat reaching control of dependences with those, we can think of legalizing more drugs with age. But it doesn't mean that reaching that age is a justification, like we are ready to take a drug, that's stupid, it means it is very dangerous before that age and reality (me for now) decides because understanding and consciousness is not developed in most to permit independence of judgment on the matter. It means the adult population is taking its responsibility of arranging things so innocence in youth is not profited from, and it means that the older a person is, the more independent of choices we want that person to be.

At around 18 alcohol will be legal, around 21 cannabis is, and at 24 you're supposed to have enough sense not to seek grave stupidities, they are for mentally retarded people, and that says a lot about the people presently cultivating it in others through PMBBD as a way to chain them to the system. Even if it is worse than cigarette, pot is not that bad, again it is the scientific emphasis on artificially selecting a single property as a godly one that is wrong, breaking the naturally stabilized product. I believe pot was better cultivated before "science" made its big emphasis on THC, and some positive properties may forever be lost, nature is not strong on pure properties, and with excellent reasons.

Now, I know some are waiting to tell me I'm wrong saying that you reach adulthood around 24, but maybe you're under the godly ideal push to profit from always younger people, young people that would be too happy if you told them they are adults at 18 with all liberties and rights, more than adults in fact, but the truth is that the younger you are the less capacity at controlling yourself, even if dependence grow stronger with age. The "good" way is supposed to be exactly the contrary, the more complex the reality basis, and the older you live globally, the older you reach adulthood. In a complete or advanced reality, it may take longer to get the basis that will permit most people to live 150 years. To live that long you got to have a good and complete basis, and you won't get that at 16, too much things to learn, too many things to explore and try. As a matter of fact, 16 years old, even 18, as the reaching of adulthood is a thousand years retarded value, I could have been an adult at that age while strolling in old Rome...

You could even see the push to have adulthood as soon as possible as a limiting factor to longevity, one more crime against humanity in the panoply this reality is collecting. At the extreme, if all the laws are made for certain people to profit from, if it is too costly in profits for them to permit people to live longer, say by 10 years, they will push people to work more than those 10 years, and the most unconsciously brainwashed to ego-gods mentality will try to subtract more years elsewhere too, like getting people to be considered full functional adults that must work earlier in life; they are trained harder to work their life out for the reality of profiting cheaters.

Right now, I'd say the adulthood should be reached around 25 (plus or minus 3 years), as the capacity to manoeuver the world independently in minimal competence, which includes having the mental capacity to steer away from manipulators and their schemes for you (keep your independence). So nobody should use PMBBD on someone under that age is what I say, surely not 15, or better, 0 in front of television. But this reality is so crappy that most people begin to have adequate judgment about the reality of the world they live in as a whole at around 35, and when talking about logical understanding and consciousness, that's still doubtful for a lot of people, some still believe in the Christ miracles, which is not far from believing in Santa Claus, the same day in fact, children got their impossible story as well as adults, let's party! Maybe you'll have to invent another step of human growth since more and more people don't start waking up to the truth of it before that age and then it's too late. Evidently, I'm talking about understanding well enough the world they live in and having the judgment to discern PMBBD, I'm not talking about the tentative waking-up of consciousness happening around adolescence, which rarely lasts to 30 years old, unless it becomes a job...

Anyway, with scientists, psy, pub and pharmaceuticals industries, our longevity is increasing tremendously they say (pushed back from 30 years old momentum, I say the reality of the last 10 years, including suicide, wars and famines, would prove the contrary, just lucky there are less smokers), while they forget some "classes" of people like those living in streets. We're too full of think positive mental and physical medications, those take care of our health, while publicists stuff us good with positive properties and an overload of exercise to grow positive those competitive muscles, for sure, with E=Mc Donald2 and Coca-Cola, with rich shareholders exemplary people eating and drinking some to encourage ego dreamers to do the same, anything good for the economy...If they could plant us on stationary bicycles to get the economy turning on Coca-Cola and energy drinks, they'd do it!

Anyway, for our reality we'll follow the 6666 law, 18 should be enough to say most won't be profited from by older people while understanding the basics of the reality with a good diversity of basic skills ability of use and development, so you're a young adult at 18 (15-21). For complete independent adulthood, it will be 24 (20-28). The "around" point permits some appropriate play for reality and people to judge and decide things, it is not a competition thing, like this reality would immediately see it, you don't compete to be the youngest adult possible, it is just a reference point to have a minimum and maximum value applied to some activities, and these can be having access to stuff coming from father reality containing a lot of PMBBD or language desecration, it's a way to limit some sexual expressions too, 16 years old people are not adults, they're not supposed to become prostitutes or carry weapons. But we will be in a reality that knows nobody is the same and some grow some facets faster than others, and the same for some cultural differences that won't develop people the same way, that's why we'll have an around point, and each step of growth adds one year to the bottom 6666 law, exponential, which you can't break, to create the around point. You cannot go over 4 years around, as it is the point that guarantees independence, whatever you live 200 years. At around 6, it is 1 year (5-7), at around 12 it is 2 (10-14), at 18 it is 3 (15-21), and at 24 it is 4 (20-28).

So, at around 24 you can become a prostitute (escort) if you want (20 as the bottom possibility, meaning there can be enough justifications and argument to have that right, or a society may want it, but no culture of prostitution, and it's still a bottom line you can't break). You like to boast you're doing the oldest trade of the world? You continually fight and cry that you want it legal, even publicized? Then it is legal now, you want to make of your body and sexuality a jobbing thing, a market thing, a profit thing? Then you'll have it in our reality; welcome. It will be a job like any other with a pay based on the judgment of people, appreciation, civilization goals, priorities, needs and education needs. Yep, prostitution is legal in our reality, what can you ask more? A way to glorify it?

It's just that you won't get a slab of cash, you'll be paid by the hour and climb an A&D decided in advance ladder of pay like everybody else, and your body will be used like any service with an id check and the transaction shown in both personal files, no secrets anymore, unless locked by the person but the prostitute personal file will contain the transactions info. And no more glorifying; filmed prostitutes will never be called a "star" thing anymore, and no love association either.

Sexuality will become the possession of the person, I mean there won't be pressures anymore to manipulate and force innocence to a twisted path, there won't be rich people running after young girls, or pimps making an illegal business out of it, there are millions of those, and this reality "love" them so much, there is so much prostitution "love", the business so critically important to the wellbeing of this reality, that there is hardly one arrest a year to talk from both side of the mouth while this reality would totally crumble in widespread chaos and violence if we removed the good illegal market of twats that have become so predominant the whole world is in a sex banalization and marketing revolution where it is "in" to show videos of how sexually performing you can be, and it is even "in" to indoctrinate innocence to it as young as possible. Don't say the contrary, the internet is overloaded with it and nobody do something about it, the selection accept, defend, encourage, watch or participate, and since we're in hell, prostitutes make a hundred times as much money as me or most good people, but it is logical to hell that the best reap the worst and the worst reap the best...

That won't happen in our reality, and you'll have pornography, don't worry, but it won't become an encouraged or "in" tube thing. Let your children have access to porn and you lose your porn, find a way to do it again and you lose citizenship. And there won't be "learning" institutions and Hollywood movies to create an environment where sexual "divergences" are encouraged, such "institutions" will not try to manipulate for a sex vision, and movies studios won't be associated to sex production as they won't be associated to governments. You won't have playboy adjacent to Hollywood adjacent to Walt Disney, like a systemized system of step to groom kids a la Michael Jackson, a deluxe prostitution party house sick machination to get young skin for rich hollywoodians, producer and politicians (i find it quite disgusting that the same mind that do children animation makes video of sodomy)

Next, you'll have ways to meet people individually as a basis, not as exploitation. It will be truly free and you'll be in an environment that reflects you to make your choices. So the free way to meet people will mostly be through your personal file and a meeting engine. There will be tons of social places to meet people too, as much as in father reality, they are very important, but the publicized emphasis on bars and alcohol like your wellbeing depends on it will disappear, and I said pressure. And our love ideal is not a condemnation, it's an emphasis, so if you want to meet dancing people in a nudist homosexual sado-maso bar where you can relax while sniffing, drinking, smoking, fucking, scratching and getting a tattoo because that's what you wanted when you were young and that's what you believe is a sane way of life for you, you can do it, you'll have specialized "professional" places to "practice your activities", like everywhere presently, we want independent adults, and those kind of activities can exist because they don't concern anybody else than those participating, unless you make publicity, go out nude in streets, or your "bubble" specifications interdicts it, or it is too low a priority as a measure to increase happiness.

So go right ahead, the bar will just have to take its responsibilities, but you won't see a sign besides the road telling you where to go for free wonderful beer with a flashing neon of a dancing girl; such publicity will be more discret and categorized. You will never involve youth, and publicity will be relative to activities; nothing wrong with a sign in front of a normal store. T.V. and internet is out of pub, you'll have a place for it and you better not invade other pub places. And the same with nude dancing bars, I don't personally need them, but I absolutely believe they are necessary, for both sexes, but I don't see it as a sex excitation craziness, like they must do everything possible to insufflate an erection on people, but more like a beauty expression that must exist, circuses he too must, and street entertainers and clowns and everything, my clown problem concern rich clowns only, even if I never understood the clown principle, clowns are fucking ugly and got hypocrisy stamped on the face, makes one feels uncomfortable, like there's a pedophile behind...

And we're not saints, we start from father reality, learn from it and do better, so all what existed with some stability must not be discarded, that means prostitution can exist, drugs can exist, the rich can exist, things like that. Evidently, since we are seeking the best way of things, there are more severe limitations and exceptions to this, but the idea is diversity, that's critically important to everything, depending on priorities. The thing to remember is no wide-spreading of wrongs with PMBBD on masses, and no exaggeration; you can pollute but you cannot exaggerate (do it too much). And the same with science, we must do all what father reality is doing in research, redo a lot of stuff and go beyond that, but things must stay under control, no exaggeration.

You can have sex as much as you want with anybody you want hurray! In any form you want, with your dog if he's naturally consenting let's go! You'll have gay bars, saunas, escort houses, prostitutes, porn movies and magazines and stores it's wonderful! But you won't desecrate the love word ok? Can you do it? There won't be imposed pub emphasis, evident signs, people paid to publicize it to friends, and you'll have to be an independent individual, an adult, and you better not manipulate young people or animals to your "ideals" of sexuality. The same will apply to your religious activities and drugs consumption. Porn "stars" won't start at 16 years old, or even 12, and the notion of deluxe prostitution or sugar daddy will not exist anymore, you are a prostitute or you are not.

We don't want to become a pyramidal ego reality? Then we'll have to act and create the situation where we won't become one, and one of those critically important point is to not have gangs exploiting or profiting or controlling things. We must not let crime become institutionalized, getting so used to it, it becomes an accepted part of our life, of our reality, even something good, the hand on the bible. There's another reality out there so if you don't like our reality you have another option; ours will spend its energy on different individuals.

There won't be "worthy" crimes in our reality, stealing millions sitting in front of a screen and passing a few years in prison as the job, and we won't spend money for incarceration or paid therapy for a lot of time. You understand the basis on which this reality stands, you'll have everything to feel well if you try to act in a good manner, even psy, but the most fundamental part that is yours, and that is the most human, is your consciousness; you're not an animal we must control and save when we fail controlling you; you control yourself and that's a basis of our reality you can't deal off. If you like or want authority find a job that is highly dependent from this form of leadership, or you know where to go. (people with a problem with authority welcome, just don't get near me, the requirement of my situation won't work well on that aspect, because to stand I had to be authoritative, in my own funny way, but it still tainted my personality, along a stressful environment, my frustrations, and my anger sometimes).

A serious crime in our reality is worse than in father reality because it doesn't defies the will of a gang that took control and systematized things for themselves, it defies the will of everybody concerned. You'll be given means to communicate your feelings, if you don't want to be a citizen of our reality then you won't be. Grave criminals will be on a list of people without system protection, no personal file either, which means no credits. So get out of here and don't come back since citizens of our reality will gain death rights against you inside the reality, and they can borrow weapons for weeks cheaply, and call these fast to their rooms in cities. If the police finds a marked criminal dead or they kill one, then good, no heavy and costly investigation with jurists, lawyer etc, unless torture. You're marked, you can die, then good and done. We'll have bounty hunters, but they won't be rewarded for killing criminals, they'll be rewarded only for successful delivery of healthy organs.

These are extreme that will only be considered if the crime exceeds the worth of the top value of a life in our reality, or assassinations. Local and small crimes will be judged by a local crime specialized A&D group and the punition will mostly be credits or a notice for some time in their file. Small crimes are not appreciated, but some level can be tolerated. More important crimes will be judged by a more specialized group. And there is no limit to the size of the punishment, except torture, since there is no limit to the size of the crime, and if a reward or gift system exists, you'd be in illogical conflict to say a punition system can't. So be careful, and don't forget people always need organs, you wouldn't want to be stripped of a few ones, because yes ablation therapy will be used, but there is all kind of punitions for all kind of crimes if understanding doesn't work with you.

That will mostly be how we deal with dangerous elements. If attacks are made against us, we may go to the extent of seeking and destroying the source; death is always an option for life destroyers. Now, this is personal to me, but there are a few crimes I wouldn't even want to give a hint of a chance to, which I'd be ashamed to let get away to father reality, those are direct pedophilia, invasion rape, youth sex trade, mass murder, things like that. I'd prefer a kick down a deep hole full of piranha or something like that, the less expensive the better, but medical experimentation can be acceptable, and they would be better than monkeys. I don't like to think money is spent on people like that. Finally, we got to be careful with pressure gangs that, very slowly, from eternal pressure, profit from good people sensitivities to overload reality with all kind of very counterproductive structures and institutions to get forever better accepted and tolerated to the point that they become a systemized problem.

As an example, there won't be totally protected national parks, all wild life expanse will be protected and separated by areas. When the area is open for hunting certain species, and that applies to oceans, you do it within the limits imposed or you'll be treated badly proportionally to the preciousness of the animal you had no right to kill. You may even end-up losing your citizenship.

That will apply to all facets of our reality, and even it takes 2000 years to grow back a civilization counted in billions from our selection, we'll wait, but we'll eventually have good people who know how to behave with life and the planet naturally. Besides, why do we have to be tolerating and accepting and peaceful and compassionate with people who don't care about life? We told you not to kill that animal; can't you put that minimal understanding in your head? Don't kill that animal! Is it so hard? Too hard for you? Don't kill it or be hunted like one! We'll give birth to someone that won't kill it instead. And we won't start bickering expensively because you were a centimeter from the line; you keep away from the line! It means death! We told you not to touch children; can't control? You're out of control? We have loving couples waiting; we'll invest in them, not you! That's where we'll put our money, not a single cent on you, no prison, no institute, no pharmaceuticals, no psy, we'll have enough of doing the investigation and justice. Depending on the verdict, you'll have to pay credits all the way to revocation from reality as an enemy of life. You'll have food, you'll have lodging, electricity, and more, everything to act civilized, you want to do the savage? No problem, we will even give you a chance, we won't put you in a prison or "put you to sleep" we'll release you, but without a citizen status, and no protection from any system. In fact, if you aint got a personal file, either permanent or temporary, you have no place in our reality. There will be bounty hunters since I see nothing wrong if people are rewarded for effectively protecting our reality from anybody without a personal file, but our bounty hunters will hunt for organs. Just be careful, bounty hunters can easily be criminals too, and you have no right to hunt anybody that is outside our borders.

Another thing we'll have to watch out is invading species, be then natural or genetically engineered. We won't have checkpoints to watch travelers, but any civilian or businessman that ends-up as a source of wild ecosystem fuck-up will be in real troubles. We'll want to have as many such ecosystems as possible, so we'll have people specifically paid to deal with that, while not forgetting that there's always a failing species, as there's always one on the rise, as long as we behave in an adequate manner with the planet. Which includes science if they become capable of helping some weak ecosystems become more interesting, and I see nothing wrong if a vast ecosystems become limited to permit the existence of a new different wild ecosystem, even a created one that is not invading. In fact, invading stuff that we must continually control must be the last of our priority of protection, and what we genetically engineer that is invading must be easily destroyed by us, or be made dependent of our interactions.

Invading species will have to be kept track of by culture specific fauna agents, paid by reality (taking a place in the culture). We'll do what we can when a situation develops, and fragile ecosystems will be specifically protected if not too much of a fight, and for the rest, sorry but humans run everywhere in every crack of the planet, that's what they do. My vision as you know on this is that as technological entities we and life should rejoin half way, tons of species have already died from our effects, and this will continue for as long as we're not stable and life respectful in our philosophy (the space competition), and then stronger eco systems will arise, and we can influence with genetics to some extent, or hunting. The other thing we'll have to watch for are sicknesses, microbes and viruses too grow ecosystems...

I'll add a note on present reality, apart from reminding myself that I shouldn't see is as an old decrepit thing, I already said it's people may appreciate a new vision if it has potential, so if it evidently starts to work toward what we stand for, then there is no point in further demonizing it, but for now it is electrocution time, hitting time, humanity will soon be crying in irreversible problems until the end if nobody with the means do something. That applies if it starts hybridizing and changing as the new reality gets functional, then everybody behave to the new ways it will want for itself, unless it sees us as a competition, in which case it will be war; we don't do things as a competition, we do things differently in part because we don't want to develop the same competitive mentality, we do things for life, not for competitors. So nothing wrong if it start exchanging all kind of ways with us, they can start hunting their devils too, the same way as we're doing, and we're the one copying the most; don't forget that, not so long ago the U.S. hunted people for rewards, I didn't invent that one, I just updated it to increase the level of difficulty to current technology, so instead of bringing back the head, you'll bring back more useful body parts and you'll learn anatomy... It's not the nicest of example, and it's not an obligation, it's only my opinion that the option of chasing evil could lessen it greatly in other people, and I personally know for sure that chasing (fighting) poor innocent animals is not as satisfying as chasing (fighting) evil. In the end, if the reality we spring from did things relatively well and permitted our success, then we'll have a proportional debt to reimburse, or see it as taking care of good parenthood.

So those who will be troubles for us may still be comfortable in the other reality with its own kind of government, but they can always demand for pardon and pass through an A&D group for evaluation. All kind of scenarios are possible, what I'm presently writing may look ridiculous, but who know how things will be in a thousand years.

Since we have 2 realities, it is "easy" to say we'll have 2 choices for people, and I see the best scenario as both realities existing for a long time, under the balance system, which exists in big part to end country competition military production, but the biggest expansion scenario would imply that this reality ends-up concentrated in a place, and if it becomes too small, it may as well become the reality of our version of criminality. All people would be born in our reality, and people can choose the other, but since almost nobody do, it means the reality is satisfactory to everybody except those who do it (show their dissatisfaction) through crimes instead of directly. That would make of this reality a pure criminal reality, but we'll still respect the people there, you simply can see them as having a different fundamental view, we'll be fair with them, appropriate resources and lands, they'll have cities, structures, stadiums, schools, computers and all, if they spend their fair means to it, but they'll be limited in their interactions with us.

Now, you don't have to see every divergence from our ideal as a crime, you know how independence is important to me, what I know is that a good basis, a good will, a good ideal, and a good reality is enough to give most people not born yet a far superior basis of mentality and action potential. Many things that make a good person can be gotten this way, discernment is one, growing as adults knowing the why and how of the ways of our reality is critical to its success, contrary to father reality that mostly need the contrary for its success, but we both need each other, even if we both see each other as future failures, because the two things are very different while both believe in their infinite future, and there are only humans dealing things, no extraterrestrial here and god there... For now our part is infinitively small and it never existed yet, there is so much work to do, everything must be done, and we're supposed to surpass this reality in potential, a cheater that is so far ahead it is reaching the end looking behind at me that is so away and small it cannot see...

So, even though we'll make all kind of limitations that will not primarily reward people from their strategy to get at the money or fame, the lack of diversity some will fear will, in fact, end up as the contrary because the missing diversity is the criminal one, mostly, and that diversity is everywhere in this world and I've had enough of it, under all its diversity...

We'll grow good people and their associated diversity, but that will take time, never forget that; patience, you can practice it, less big shots around to put pressure and manipulate...It took present reality many thousands of years and trillions of people working their life out to start revealing itself, don't think this new way will be easy to form, like our selection, from true love mainly, that will take thousands of years to develop, you won't pop up a new reality just writing stuff, it is the start of an infinite adventure, you may start things with some efforts, your children may start living in it, their children may see it becoming a success, their children won't know what a cataclysmic end fear is, then planets will go by and who knows...

You understand that we are dependent from the father reality controlling its criminal elements too, we'll need to be defended against people that will see us as evil, they could send us a schwatsthzenegger tartinator or that other guy from the matrix, to destroy our system mainframe, and they'll say it's because it's omnipotent and represent the great convergence and will cause hell on earth, things like that, and the ones we'll reject won't be happy about us too. The life reality needs the help of the other one in all facets, but this works both ways, we will help in turn when we can, whatever the help is, we may send armies of helpers in a cataclysmic situation, or help build back things that have been destroyed in chaos, or permit it to end in respectful manner if it slowly comes to that, and nothing wrong if it lasts a thousand years, fairness, don't forget for what you stand for, compassion, peace, all these things are alive because we wanted them to better exist as not twisted for profiting anymore.

And whatever the whole world went through, humanity stood up in the end, and it raised better and stronger, succeeded at creating the necessary association to go through it, anyway, bad feelings aren't eternal. But I think that if the other reality comes to be absorbed, it will go through a long inter-adaptation process; the two realities will close together and come to work so well together that remnants of the other systematization won't be worth keeping and the fusion will take place with a prison left behind, probably on an iceberg (along politicians who deny climate change, all to the north pole, and arrange your brothel so your whole party don't end-up in the water). You're cold all of a sudden? You won't get away, you know what I think of prisoners that cost more than the bottom line of citizenship...

Since we don't want to make of every limit variations and mistakes a criminal thing, we'll be better if we invent an encouragement system where people trying to live the ideal more fully are rewarded with bonuses. There won't be many situations where those can be gotten since the global way of the reality will mostly be understood and endorsed, but as an example, we don't necessarily want to punish fat people for eating too much and stressing the medical system, but we don't like it, but people can emotionally develop bad attitudes and genetics can be a bitch, so how do we manage to pass our message that we prefer this person to take a better path while not making the person feel bad for it, because, seriously, who subscribes to fat magazines when they're young? I think giving them an appropriate choice of production or service that doesn't encourage them in an accelerated health or self-esteem degenerative pattern can help, but it must be tempting, and it is better if it is a chain that is available once, so people are more interested in continuing the effort, while not abusing the system, gain access to high level expertise and more expensive or involved products and services while understanding that the goal is for them to experience the result of those rearwards while knowing that the goal is independent control of this propension, so at some point the rewards must end, because you're supposed to do something by yourself, not work solely if we put a reward up front, you do it because you're supposed to care, we do it because we care about you, with the best of our intents, if you don't care and you're happy about it then die I'll be happy not to care about you, we'll find a replacement that will want to experience existence and care about stuff, if it's just to write a book to piss on it all...I don't know what we'd do with such a person, but we'd care for sure, because you got to have critical crap going on in your social soul or intelligence, or network thing, to have people actually pass their life in poverty writing how they hate it living in your reality and how they'd prefer to care for its termination, or replacement, or update, demanding on the emotional state of the person, because the line is very thin between all out destruction and constructive creation, intelligence is in big part a reflection process of doing better from the solutions it elaborates around a problem, and sometimes the person that should be the closest to us end up the farthest from this incomprehension, or it could be divide to reign...

They could have a choice of a free set of physically strenuous activities at a quality gym or a specialized one, another choice is a long term trekking adventure, or a lot of time with a personal nutritionist or trainer, smoking or a bunch of salads sound bad though, a dependence adjuster guy could be invented too, because I know for one that i can manage my dependences by playing with them, some I even choose, not heroin, but more normal manageable things, and I pertinently know that I have very little to do to completely slip in decheance, I always said I wrote this as a responsibility, for myself, humanity and for life, and I always saw my success point as its final line, that was my challenge for my fucked-up life, I can go farther if I feel appreciated but I definitively don't have to, particularly if my situation is in no way an encouragement to take care of myself, I'm stressed and tired, my sleep have been fragmented by my environment for years, sometimes I'm so intensely angry that I'm ready to suffer more as some kind of vengeance where only me learn something, seriously the streets are tempting, the forest is tempting, drugs are tempting, women, free crazy, sometimes killing is tempting too, and who's to stop me after all I wrote? The law, right...

You can pick one and or eliminate one or both and what remains will contribute to the new pool of 3 choices that will be available at your next stop in the ideal you're trying to follow. That's weird when you think of it though, it's like you got to grow lard to get at the rewards, but I don't think it will be worth the investment, and anyway, growing not fat is the goal so you are on a continuation course here, fat people as they eventually become not fat and they fall on their pool of choices concerning health.

Choice or money is my general opinion, that's in part why I dislike Christmas, the forced gift thing. I see nothing wrong if we create a set of ideal criteria for many aspects of living by age, and people successful at it get bigger or better choice of rewards, I think that's good competition, is not hard to implement and it could be applied to many aspects of our goals, we could even have special quality items practically only available this way, the choice or the money, maybe we could even patent things to permit people to make their whole life an emphasis on one or the other, the possibility is there that you gain access to a high standard of living just by taking the challenges of reality, which you can see as achievements and choosing gifts rewards instead of credits; a reward system can take many form. Evidently, you don't implement something like this if you don't get worthy positive effects or feedback, so you must see it as an experiment for as long as you're not sure, or the appropriate vision is to do the normal monetary system to run along your goals, and you add gifts option when you can, good ones people like, and see where it goes with time.

Now, we'll have to deal with "public relation" (I hate the association, it makes me think of fucking the public) since it's another area where manipulators can get their shit going. Any media using bullshit or creating disinformation on youth on purpose will be at risk of losing that privilege in our reality, and that includes singers and poets. But it will have to be evident, flagrant or repetitive. Control of PMBBD is critical to our success, moderation is the highest limit since there is no way to eliminate it without going too far, and I think it's supposed to be a wheel that rolls along where the reality is mentally and scientifically, meaning if your path is any good it should get naturally minimized from people developing discernment, surely not increase like people are more and more susceptible to manipulators, like they're fucking regressing back to the golden ages of Christianity (the dark ages of sorcery)...There is also the fact that your ego is your person, and its minimal drive is survival to comfort, see it as what you unconsciously think you have a right to beyond anything else, but once you're finally embarked on this wild horse it's super easy to miss the point where you should build your home, and when you finally got it under control, you definitively want to throw it in dreamland direction... Your self-fulfillment goals are supposed to be a good thing and it's critical to any life, it's the exaggeration, emphasis, encouragement etc that is far worse than "bad" for survival, often of all life affected by it...

The worst thing you can do is give control of something to people who got infinity as the upper limit of what they can take, or their value, but if we are stuck with this tendency, then we're as well have excellent values and fairness principles, and that will be our ideal. The good philosophy is that to have a minimally good value you must not overwhelm what you gain or take by your by negative effects on life, which can take many form, like self-enrichment at the price that others live in poverty.

But I already explained that a few times, it's just to tell you to be careful lighting your television or listening to your happiness distributors as you read me, you could get your brain scrambled, and it's easy to forget the new stuff that's like far away science fiction, while boasting we'll duplicate people by their atoms by 2050, or transpose our google brains to the internets for the great conjuncture of human and machine where you are everywhere in the cloud in 3D paradise omni impotence. It's easy, when you lack judgment, to quickly forget my serious stuff and start seeing things anew from your reality's godly perspectives... Sure that I'm not publicized like a superstar, and the market doesn't even want to touch my stuff for fear it becomes a spreading disease, but things are not "bad" because you compare them to your "good" ego ideal while forgetting the complexity of everything or the dark side of things because it prevents your fragile mind from falling in depression; when you start doubting, think of what I wrote before and things will fall into place. Another thing; when I get emotive it is because i hit underlying frustrations, which are related to my feeling of being powerless, like when things have lost their good sense to the point that they have become a condemnation. When I moderate it means a thing is probably at the wrong place or wrongly used or exaggerated; you'll realize the later is the case for most of what I write. Now, you can't dump the influence of father reality all around, but heavy infiltration of screen or communication by inflated people is a sure fail of our reality. Again, the key is to grow independent individuals with a basis.

Television and radio structure like we currently have will die (except to keep the old technologies running for science and as available production), and everything will become digital. There will be 2 main communication channels; a land pipeline based one, and a satellite based one. We will have to recycle phone lines, cables, dishes etc, and replace all that scrap by a single big wire, bundled with electric wires when possible. We will study the possibility of eliminating present home electric wires too, by making a still bigger one, as big as a thumb, which carries electricity on a certain frequency and data on another frequency. But I don't know if that's realist, frequencies may interact, or we may need to change power frequency and voltage values, or put too many filters and condensers, so we may be better with bundled wires and anyway, it may be possible we bundle fiber optics instead.

Everybody will have basis communication bandwidth with a good, not the best, portable computer like the one I described earlier in "Mud Street" toward the end, not a gadget with rare elements that you dump whole, but one with interchangeable diverse parts that are not manufactured with rare elements when possible, only the main unit may. That computer will be powerful enough to run everything in high, not necessarily maximal, quality and speed, including all present games and 3D modeling engines.

That's why present polluting and resources costly gadgets are totally inadequate for our ideals, they are made for fast food "new" and "wow" throngs on hype with a planted green chip (program) on the head instead of an understanding consciousness, gadgets with functions for profits that hardly last a few years before ending up in garbage, even if a scientist was paid by some industrial to make a pub on television or internet showing the green sticker on its back, the energy star logo on its screen, and the recycling button. Poof! Magic! Everybody is a saint! Intelligent, good, let's make the planet smarter now, just buy as much of our stuff as you can to prove you're smart, and the rarest resources of this earth are...recycled? Resources we may not have anymore when we'll need them for something critical, but it's like telling a Neanderthal to stop eating mammoth because there is forever less and someday there will be no more (I'm sure it happened)...And today there is no more, it's just as fact, and you may not care, a mammoth may not be critical to your life, but how do you know? Maybe someday humanity will become a depressive species because of all the diversity it destroyed, become insane from destroying everything it can't control or tame, and how do you know a resource won't be useful in the future when new technologies will develop? And it's not that far, thanks to gadgetry garbage produced and publicized in heavy pollution for profits; the way we dump electronics, there will be no more of some critical resources in 100 years, maybe far before that, while you cry that you're making the world in the name of your "love" for children, the future... So prepare yourself for your worldwide depression of losing half your wild life, culture, knowledge, entertainment, and not the least, space potential. But I'm probably exaggerating, and alternative may be hidden, and scientists say nanobots will grow cities and people and gold from dirt somewhere around 2050, TV scientists, I mean, scientific vulgarizers doing public education, who sometime look high on acid and got this tendency to infantilize or articulate like they're talking to a bunch of retards (maybe their target audience, fill those retards with your bullshit extraordinary extrapolations so they are another force saner people of better judgment will have to battle in hell...), but media people know what they're doing, it's professionalism, journalism, they don't participate in bias stuff.

This reality could dream of using nano technologies to answer throngs of its grave problems and become more invincible, but even if many scientists makes it look like the perfect miracle, the philosopher's stone, I don't believe a single cent it will make the world better, it will just form new gangs of unfair exploiters and profiteers. It will revolutionize many things, but not the way we are pushed to believe; nothing will change while they're already singing hunger will end, that there will be no more sickness, the end of poverty, rape, death, pollution, we'll grow intelligence in buckets, computers will be as small as a dime, fabulous cities, virtual people everywhere, spaceships, superstructures, intelligent robot servants, eternal life, etc. Always the same songs, things always get better for the best system, just wait for 2050, the world will be perfect and extraordinary, a paradise

I say nothing of this will happen before a very long time, it is all mass PMBBD to get money, and the result is that people won't react adequately to problems. They're just raising hell to new levels, they're even thinking they'll grow humans with that, so profoundly deficient they are in their hype overdrive, and even if they could, they'd produce clones, preferably super sex clones, and I don't have much of a good opinion of the idea, even if there are situation where I could understand their use, but not widespread for sure.

I don't discard all these things as impossibilities, but things must change before dreaming of too much, the amount of research and association must raise to extraordinary levels, exactly the philosophy of research for space travel, all the wasted time and resources for inadequate priorities should have been canalized to these technologies, and that means the end of rich entertainment gods, rich people altogether, the end of war and the end of country competition, if you really want humanity to live on another planet... And for that we'll need everybody to have a fair basis of happy living to permit science, technologies, engineering, mathematics, chemical and life sciences to be available to everybody while working hand in hand planetary wide, nothing hidden, and in maximal truth, but you got to remove a lot of PMBBD and hype from the loop, for a start.

As it is, our main goal with nanocarbon will be production for profiting, new war devices and satellites from the lighter and stronger stuff, things like that, but humanity will be in massive troubles long before adequate massive production exist for something really good at the point of mass availability to everybody. You're completely nuts thinking you'll live in a nano world in 2050, and all that is only if it gets that many extraordinary uses, making powerful computers as small as a dime, or growing cars and buildings and dinosaurs...the scientist "god" dream come true, we're almost back in 1970 where people thought they would be on another utopia planet in 2000, we never learn don't we? Nuclear reaction too was supposed to create a wonderful utopia...I say trusting humanity's fate in the hands of scientists from believing their media extrapolations will be the last of our mistake, it is not because science made a successful experiment that all imaginative extrapolations from it will become reality.

Many scientists need to lie and create loads of PMBBD hype bumming at governments to have money for their things, often just to keep their job, then the government add loads of PMBBD hype for his election to godhood, then the pub machine add load of PMBBD hype just for kicks, then the country competition add load of PMBBD hype. They are all trying to profit from a cake (new thing). Probably not much of all those fabulous extrapolations will happens in truth, or it will take hundreds of years, or it will only make hell final while people will see this as the end to all their problems, like a justification to waste resources like there's no tomorrow.

The same applies to robots, those scientists who imperatively want to create robotic humans to fuck with as a priority are totally insane and without minimal judgment, in 50 years there will be robots everywhere, more than humans, they want us to believe, to spend tons of money creating their ideal human, like we are not the way we should be in their super vision. I bet there won't even be one to kill the insects in my apartment; all they'll be capable of producing within that time are radio control armies of killers to eliminate humans, good scientists, or looking cute things copying human expressions or activities, or products with a better property.

We won't live in a wonderful world with robots doing everything so we can be rich and do nothing, not in 50 years, not in a hundred years, never, and there will never be the scientist dream of a human robot, that's ridiculous, besides, think of the pollution involved in having that many robots, think of the thousand more nuclear reactors you'll need to recharge them all, intelligent scientist! Stop filling your pockets and wasting resources by creating hype to preserve your job, create and program the life reality if you want to use your intelligence to truly create a good and adequate future, that's what you have to do, it will deal and prioritize well such matters, no politician campaigns in sight, no need to competition for money, and no profiteers.

The principle you must understand about lasting stuff is that in the end, if you remove better technology that can replace inefficiency in some facets, well-made lasting things will cost less resources, less production, less human energy investment and it will result in less pollution (there are many facets to pollution, the need for industries is pollution, more people is pollution etc...). That applies to everything and the more lasting the production you make, the richer the people, except in inversed ironic hell reality that is patented to increase entropy on many things in the name of the economy...

Even from what have been historically produced to date, there shouldn't be no more poor people, but what have been built have been systemized to profit the best manipulators and profiteers on the argument that they make the production available, and thus price will lower etcetera, it's kind of logic because they condemned the means to themselves, and it works a little since the system adjusted itself to permit it to appear on TV, as an encouragement for envy, but this luxury diversity is the last of our priority, not the first, it's inversed over here, ideologically, we'll produce some appropriate level of it, and we'll up the standard along the rise of our poverty line, so in effect, if everybody (around 90%) is living comfortably, you'll have access to present reality level of luxury as a right of availability, meaning reality makes the option available for cultural societies that want to make their luxury standard higher, while not overwhelming their usefulness toward noble goals, it should be implanted as an encouragement toward that end in fact. For now we have your videos of it, thanks, let's call it what is "useful" for 99% of people (imagine possible fantasies by watching videos of luxury stuff, and work a little for its existence...).

That slipped a bit, the question being; why do you think you build a house? To make it low quality so it doesn't last? I personally I have better sense than that in my head, whatever you think, if I build a house I do it thinking someone else won't have to build it, is that logical? I want to make quality construction whatever my lifetime because I know the value it has. Next, the only reason you forever buy a house the same price it was produced is to carry the money to profiting hands, the system is not made to make people happy and comfortable, it is made to always keep unfairness at the most extreme level possible. At the worst it will forward the money on projects for the rich if statics show too much money in their bank accounts versus normal people.

Even if you make a paradise where people have nothing to do except enjoy, not that it should be the definition of a paradise, people of poor understanding or self-control will scrap it for their unrealistic needs...In fact this reality is so profoundly wrong that it will prefer to ruin it than to let people live in it without working to admire, enrich, serve people of poor judgment who need to live in costly exaggeration, eliminating justice for systemized unfairness. And the pressure will take pyramidal form, it will always put pressure to be as cheap as possible with some people, so that others can have a "superior" fantastically exorbitant house or yachts with a channel to a deluxe prostitutes (escorts) stash while being served by inferior innocents in admiration in front of television. And to make you feel good , they'll pay you to build giant ego power-trip marvels or temple, or pyramids, and then you'll need to spend energy (money) eternally to preserve these marvels, used in big part to make their name or mentality or gang eternal.

Just don't think you're not supposed to work, nobody except you can build a paradise, it was just a gross extrapolation to make you understand in what kind of situation you are. (I noticed lately that pedophiles do exactly that, they are nice and paternalist like they actually think they have a good effect on the kid, but from what I understand this guy is building himself a denial defense that only castration will be able to settle, he think he's super intelligent and good, and the profs is the happy kid, that should feel bad for talking about it, for all the good he's provided, including his twisted "wisdom". This attitude is spread planetary wide through the ways of the economy, and the thief thinks he's good for manipulating his victims, and the victim think he's good for tolerating even defending the mentality, with the provided arguments, becoming twisted too! So in the end, I shouldn't tell those people that good and evil is about caring for life, not having a bad effect on it, because evil cares for life by destroying it with smiles, and it will twist everything to implant pedophilia principles, that you'll defend like an happy kid that get himself fucked by authority. Evil refuses to understand, but in the end, it's really a question of wanting to change or not, really, do you really have the willpower to change?).

And that's kind of a bad condemnation to form a selection of people who don't want to take an adequate attitude and develop abilities to understand and fight for the best worth of things. We are on the track of destroying everything for profits, whatever it is controlled by the supposedly perfect free market (more later) or governments, and that includes humanity, life and the earth. We'll waste everything for the sole reason that some people must get themselves seen or make as much profits as possible within their lifetimes, before a resource is exhausted. You think their preoccupation is the future of humanity? Absolutely not, family dynasty and hegemonies is, their ass is, whatever the image they project with well-paid expert who tire saying industrialists today are saints, and media people who tire of saying they're good philanthropists, seriously, I know the elite shows how it respect the inferior classes by their systems, but this is getting ridiculous in the sense of blatant manipulations when you're pushed publicity to watch scientific data proving the rich are truly superior people, it is now proven scientifically that the rich are rich because they have a good heart, they are people of empathy and understanding, their fortune is the result of their superior intelligence, and extremely hard work and going over super tough hurdles that would kill anybody else, so you would be evil to judge, you don't understand. Everybody is supposed to be a millionaire in hell, if you're not it's because you are not as good as them with their great intelligence and you didn't work hard enough (to crush the competition). It's not sarcasm, it's scientific discoveries, within very strict methodology they omit talking about, where the big cars, prostitutes, yachts, parties, private jets and paid luxuries are not accounted for in the frugality calculation and their vision of good and evil, but I wonder who consumes this stuff, that is the most expensive and difficult to produce after all...

Good industrials exploiting people in Africa to produce your gadgetry, cleaning their image by sending money back to poor exploited people in Africa that never end being poor (it's like the system taking almost all your life energy (time), then distributing a bunch of gifts once in a while. And you'll be happy like a moron to receive one, particularly if the reality's so good you ended-up starving in the streets...). For them it is illogical that they only make half a million a year, they can't cope with such a small number, it is ridiculous in their mind. And they can't understand by themselves, you have to educate them on how to deal their ego in function of others, with the bullet of a gun because that's all they understand. But don't worry, they work hard to change, it's just that big industries take a long time to "adapt?" long enough to quit with a maximum of money... And don't think you're different because you're poorer, singing your "love" for "life" as you read my book, and a month later you forgot it all and dream of winning 45 000 000$ at lotto, no number's too big, the biggest the more you'll want it in fact; there are people who make a difference between winning 30 billions or 40, at 30 they're not interested, but for 40 billions they may buy a ticket! Or is it that the selection is so susceptible to manipulators and their pubs and pressures that they buy tickets proportionally to how much TV makes it big? 2 yachts for the price of one! It's like TV is really a direct and efficient mind control device here...

Independent specialized electronic gadgets will be more expensive in our reality too, but based on a different philosophy; until they are proven barely using limited resources, while recycling or dumping don't produce grave toxins. Instead, not only will you have all these things, but everybody will, so you'll stop the stupid boasting about how hot connected you are with your phone. Gadgets that don't last and pollute like there is no tomorrow and that recycle by magic will stay the monopoly of the other reality.

At first we'll want 2 options, a small pocket device and a sturdy "throw on the table" complete unit that can do a maximum of things, a portable comfortable unit you can attach on your body through different ways, on which you plug all kind of diverse interfaces (visual-manual), light enough for everybody to carry comfortably. Battery power will be function dependent, meaning chips and programs will exchange information as to power needs, automatically shutting down or powering up parts of chips and circuits depending on needs. That's more advanced power saving functions than what exist today. If it detects you read a book, it switches to book power etc. And that's just for battery power, it doesn't need to be big but it must last a minimum of time. Your basis computer is not your car, there are electric plugs everywhere, and the reality knows through your personal file that you're connected. You don't have to power-up the unit to use some of its functions either, if you want to listen to music, you plug headphones and the computer will detect it and that's it. Now, I know some are panicking about socialism here, but this is not socialism, there is a basis for everything and everybody in our reality, then you expand from it, with a view that is more akin to capitalism, maybe you could see it as an hybridization of aspects of socialism and capitalism, like Russia and the USA becoming best friends? That's absolutely not the idea I had though, it was more like "fuck all this shit, let's start understanding everything from scratch without education".

We must integrate as many functions as possible, like a mike, small speakers and camera, but these things will exist as interfaces too, the same with the screen; I want the most powerful device to be the top choice, and that means we must be capable of plugging different screens to it, the device will carry its own screen, but the graphic processor will be capable of powering up or down depending on needs, you'll be capable of plugging a second screen of the same size as an example, or you'll be able to plug a single bigger screen like around 19 inches, beyond that, if you really need it, graphic adaptors can be made.

For the most powerful units, I will prefer the screen to open in two, like a chess game box, only smaller, as I already explained earlier. If you only want to type some text while saving battery power, only half the screen can be lighted, or each part can be applied a different function. The basis computer itself can take any funky forms as long as they are tested stable full features, pocket book size, palm size, CD drive size, or even twice as big for the most powerful, will be a good start. The reality will provide you one computer interface with its systems, you can choose a palm device, but a whole computer is better, as long as it is portable; we want people to access reality systems whenever they want, wherever they want, as quickly possible. I don't care you waste your time, but the reality will still provide devices that minimize time wasting, we want any moment to be an opportunity for people to interact if they want. The best devices will do everything a computer is supposed to do, powerful and versatile, that's why the first versions will probably be bigger. And the principle for external interfaces is that they are dead powerless things unless plugged, then the computer detects it and use its chips and circuits, data stash, power and programs, to make it work. No newspapers and magazines and books industrials anymore, we want forests to grow, everybody got a basis computer, so nobody is disadvantaged or need paper, except for art.

You dump an interface that doesn't please you anymore, not the whole thing, and if you want you change the machine while keeping all your interfaces. We'll do plugs that will last more than 15 years under heavy use, which is not the case for most current plugs, like the new SATA plugs, I scrapped a hard drive from disconnecting it lately, and I'm ready to bet more electronic components go to the dump faster than before because of cheap plugs. And don't think I'm complaining and moralizing for nothing, you'll get a new reality from complaining and moralizing, maybe you'll stop seeing these things as negative... Plugs are important, the computer I'm talking about will need quality plugging, without wasting gold to make them more expensive. And the same for hard drives, I've got a SCSI hard drive that have been running for 15 years, and I use it for a swap file to this day because I've had 3 hard drives that took the dump within a few years, one that started throwing its head inside, and 2 blew their master boot record, so what's wrong? Why don't we invent redundant master boot record or something to be done with this problem? That's why I switched my swap file to my old drive. Add a crappy swap file system to crappy plugs and you got a hard drive killing machine!

Maybe I'm exaggerating a little, and these, as always, are unproven personal opinions, but, why does windows still need a swap file anyway? Not enough of 6 gigabytes of memory? I say we don't need a swap file anymore, reduce windows appetite on memory, optimize data seeking algorithms, and if a program needs more than available memory, then let that program have its swap file. But I guess they made the swap file an embedded efficiency function of windows, the programming would be too much of a hell to redo and gain back the efficiency of.

And the same with those automatic programs of drive optimization; it may be good once in a while to optimize a drive, but I say putting the thing on automatic don't help drives last longer, "scratching" around continually making things faster and better in theory while in truth it's the hard drive that take the garbage can faster without a gain in performance because it is wasted in the optimizing process of "scratching" around continually; they optimize drives for scrap. And why is it is continually scratching on a hard drive that got nothing else than windows while I got 2 G of memory that shows empty, what's wrong? Forever optimizing windows? All mixed-up within itself? Maybe I'm wrong, the brand new drive must be dying, but no ways will a hard drive last 15 years this way, and I wouldn't choose Microsoft to make a reality systematization on that for sure. We'll need a few big buildings full of electronic equipment, very costly things, and we won't ruin resources replacing hard drives every 5 years for some profiting industry, and I don't like hard drives, I've been waiting 10 years for better options, and I believe all the waiting is only to permit rich egos systematizing new technologies for bigger profitsss. And by the way, your basis computer won't have a hard drive if it can't last 15 years, I interdict it, with a smile, but maybe we won't even need hard drives since we won't need much more than a few hundred GB which you can easily make as memory if you stop the bullshit for profits, unless big Bills continue its tendency to gobble resources for free in "Windows Bloat", what's so big in there?

We'll need the best that can be presently produced, we will need to modify many programs to make them more to our standards, and adjust what may work slower from some data transfer emulation too. But our needs cannot be fulfilled by the way we presently deal with technology, inventions or knowledge; it is all a mess for profiting and country competition. Present tech industries have all kind of secret and brevets that tremendously limit technological development and our liberties while polluting more for it in the name of profits, often from a retarded technology, as much as possible because we are unwilling to do research and give appropriate rewards otherwise than as a profit competition, and another batch to protect this aspect of the system or that... That's another reason we'll need a centralized base of knowledge; no more hidden or monopolized knowledge.

There is no ultra-complexity run by a single kind of attitude for self-protection paranoia of profits schemes. The philosophy is that knowledge is a possession of the reality (people, planet, life), nobody got a secret knowledge (except personal things); it is all associated to a single communication entity which develops relations. Redundant knowledge gets eliminated, conflicting knowledge can be seen as a red relation instead of a green ones. Management of complexity is thus made easier, meaning a manager needing a lot of time dealing in general knowledge will have an easier time. But everything is separated in work weight, no management of vast entities condemned to a "god"; if there is too much work, well develop another branch and add another person, we'll prefer that than to enrich someone with a pile of gold, or reap more incompetence, and you'll have to do with the readjustment people do to the ladder of pay, don't fool too much with logic if you want to keep on making sense...

Knowledge is available to everybody and projects are passed through A&D groups. A cultural society either makes a project or gets one and the reality got a window of expertise to help implant it. If the reality decides it want this or that food industry, it is not be a monopoly dealing with the subject that get the contract, it is a cultural society that will get it, appropriate to many factors, like the type of food possibilities in the area. If the reality needs 5 research and or development and or production pharmaceuticals industries, 5 different people may develop those independently while adding to the knowledge base. Or in the example of a chemical-petroleum refinery, a cultural society takes care and develop expertise for one, it is "their" refinery, if they're good and are willing to develop more expertise they may get 2, while the reality watches for quality, and it cost what it cost, no round corners, everything is there. In the end what I mean is that we'll want 100 independent quality industrials who can get their hands dirty a little, instead of 10 thinking only of world hegemony, and whatever there will seems to be supplementary cost from more people developing such expertise, or to watch for competence, or security, I'm sure it will end-up as less from removing incredibly expensive mentalities from there, and I'm positive more people will be happy, more.

Now, you can buy new computers if you want, we surely won't stop computing industry developing, neither will we limit people to a single computer, but those will be a lot more expensive than their equivalent today, and that applies to people who will want an independent cell phone, we will produce them, but they will be more expensive. Still, the best basis computer will covers most electronic uses, and those are not that big and heavy and they can take many forms. What we want is to control pollution and exploitation of rare resources and to provide a fairness basis; someone without a computer is disadvantaged unfairly.

The whole reality is electronics dependent, as is present reality, so we'll want the means to never lose that power, so it means we must keep a lot of rare resources for the space step, we may have to do with what's on earth of some rare stuff until we've got a base around Jupiter, so we got to control those industrialist crazies to whom things are always all-right, always doing the best they can do, but profits competition is too important and big companies take an eternity to change they say. The truth is that they want the same thing as car companies; fill the planets with cars, they want people buy 3 or more cars while country competition, systemized unfairness and profiting from others make it so that there are billions of people without one. The same applies with computers; they want an independent specialized computer everywhere there is a little stupid task to perform, coffees with computers on every tables, libraries with computers in front of every chair, schools with computers at every desk, jobs with computers everywhere there is a switch, and 3 or more at home while country competition, systemized unfairness and profiting from others make it so that billions of people are still illiterate, until they'll learn English...

It won't work like that for us, people will have a computer and we'll try to minimize the rest of computers laying everywhere by passing it through the central computer. If you want to type stuff in a coffee, carry your basis computer. There won't be any such arguments with a façade effort while the truth is that only profiting is important. For now we're just lucky helium may not be necessary except for critical science, so go ahead; waste it laughing at me, and keep a little, so I can laugh at myself too, laughing together is better, as long as you got the discernment to know when I'm serious, or when I'm pushing a little.

The way important industries will work is that they'll do exactly what they presently do, but as is the case for everything, no rich money stashers anymore. I'm talking important industries here. These won't be meant to enrich people or make families hegemonies anymore, the bosses running these (critical industries) will get a top pay and criminals top punition, these areas are top important, top priority, concern masses to dependence point, so we'll want people of strong integrity you can't sway with money, it will be their ambition, the pride of their life, and we'll have to show we appreciate better than a portrait on a wall too. Today normal businesses models are somewhat ok to me and they should be implanted with adjustments, I don't think the goal of most people opening a decent sized business is to compete and destroy the enemy or exploit people to slavery, I think there is a lot of personal challenges taking going on there and we definitively don't want to discourage that. The same for a lot of people somewhat following their destiny I should say, there is only so much personal challenging one can take... The other difference will be situated at the level of what we'll define as a worthy to produce advancement, and that will be done through an A&D group which will judge what any industry that uses rare or very polluting resources will churn out. Evidently, this is a whole class of A&D groups which will judge many things.

You want to produce better graphic cards? Present your project, your abilities, to concerned people, and they will decide if they needs another development team on the subject, if it is reality that will decide production and pay or if the free market option can be available (spheres of production will be categorized in advance, producing atomics won't be on the free market for sure). Then you make your thing, and once you have prototypes, you say what it will precisely cost in all facets, like resources needs, and concerned people will decide if it provides sufficient benefits to be mass produced and what else will eventually get a lower production rate if need be for equilibrium, and evidently, the initial investment to get things going technically will be taken into consideration. Evidently, successful production reward the development team.

Never underestimate what you can do with the A&D groups principles, this is one of the most powerful tool of the reality, you can put as much money as you put in all the politician system, including their campaign and bureaucrats to make a powerful system of A&D, explore modifications, program the system to work well, and you'll be rewarded with things well done all over the place, and yes it's a challenge, but you don't spend credits unnecessarily in our reality, just don't exaggerate.

Now to go back to computers, the basis computer is not made of pieces taken all around, it will be made of the best and most trusty stuff and it will be upgraded as it is produced. Tons of versions will exist, but always with the same philosophy, and it is not experimental stuff so everything must always work well with the interfaces, it is not meant to ship full of bugs or with half functioning functions needing constant updates.

When many better facets evidently surpass old ones, the reality will remake the whole thing, even redesign the plugs if necessary. Those computers will be sturdy, 5 feet drop on cement things, and they'll last a minimum of 15 years, meaning that a complete replacement can be produced and distributed within that time for everybody, so your computer will be minimally replaced between 10 and 15 years as a goal until technology stagnates, in which case, sturdiness will increase for far more lasting units, and diversity will increase too. And 15 years is just a standard for starting, and I base that from how long I believe current battery technology should be capable of lasting; sorry for you if you are crumbling under battery garbage for profits, but this craziness got to stop. So I base their lasting time on battery lifetime, but the machine itself may last 50 years and I'll be happy about it, it's just that 15 years is long enough to say that new technologies will force a replacement.

When the first production cycle ends, the reality will start randomly replacing them for the proven better ones, the new formats will be placed online and people who want it will put their name on the distribution list, first ones first picked, but we'll want a few categories of people based on priorities; people who are not power crazy or who don't need an immediate more powerful one will go on a secondary list that will have increasing random picking based on the reduction of the priority list, and you keep all your interfaces (interfaces can be free market things).

As production increases, there is nothing to stop people exchanging them when they want, it will become a vast market of free exchanges of basis computers (a truly free market? Not a manipulation bullshit?), which are seen as a total worth by the reality so its cost is calculated in the basis of reality cost. And don't forget people may decide what they want from appropriate A&D groups, if they judge the basis is too costly they may limit basis computers production, what I mean is that we won't have 2 computers available by person, maybe in a lot of time, but 1.1 is a minimum start. A limit will have to be set to quantity, like everything that is part of the basis, those computers are free, you don't buy them, but I wouldn't underestimate the power of the basis principle though, it may become the reality itself and it would be all-right to me if people wanting more are satisfied too, the biggest mistake you can make is an utopia without variations, or individuality, or independence or ego dreams; I'm not against the frivolities of luxury, I'm against uncontrolled or infinite taking, or a reality systematization based on it.

We can put a lot of diversity on these units, even at the beginning, smaller and less powerful ones, palm size to portable size, all kind of designs can be made. They can be exchanged and the identity changed at a transfer point which will test computer functionalities and damage; those computers are important enough that their history must be written simply too, both these things, history and identity will be hardware coded, like a processor implanted BIOS related to serial numbers on both side, the user and the system. They are life adventure computers, they're not show-off computers, like many cars, where a scratch devaluates the thing by half and gets people frustrated. But no scratch on purpose, you care for them, they are very precious and they must last so you don't throw them around.

The transfer point is where you'll try to explain why it is cracked or slack or pierced or whatever, and no need to panic unless you destroyed it on a wall in which case you'll be limited to older or lacking units for some time, unless you buy one. So, a little explanation is all what is needed, then the information is recorded in the computer itself and on the system, it has a history to itself and everybody's file is related to all the computers they had in their life, a score can even be given, like a reputation number in people's file. And a computer is not dumped after 15 years, it is on the list of availability, but any computer on that list will work like brand new. A computer may be on the availability list for 50 years or more, cumulating a long history of people using it, and it will have a nostalgia effect, so don't be surprised if old computers are still popular after so much use, even if they are less powerful, and there are people who will want to stick to the same computer all their life and far from discouraging them and making publicity for new models, we'll want to encourage the attitude if the computers are still appropriate. And you don't need a powerful computer to be appropriate and for personal activities; the reality needs you to have a computer for education and reality (system) interactions (human interface with reality) mainly, even if we won't limit them to that, but if you don't need a powerful one or prefer a smaller one like a blackberry, then all the better on exploitation and production. This computer is not necessary to your life, it is necessary for better civilization aptitudes and better learning and knowledge and entertainment capacities, so if you don't want one, we surely won't force one in your hands, but you'll still have to pass through one to interact with our systems. As time advances, we'll have a better idea of people's preferences for them.

So you understand that the reality will produce mainly the more powerful ones because of their abilities, and we don't want them to be exchanged every few years, but there are people that won't need such power so we'll have smaller ones too. The availability of exchange will increase with time, but if you want a specific model you'll probably have to put your name on a list and wait until it becomes available. Then your identity is transferred and you surrender your old unit back to the reality. I should add that there is nothing to stop people from buying commercial versions they will own and throw them on walls if they want, and they'll be able to "implant" their identity in them too. With time, it will probably get smaller and lighter.

If you're starting to see things globally, then you're starting to understand that production and things replaces life, the more production, the less life, including humans, so you're better take the best path of production versus rights at the beginning, in a sense, the options or potential you open with production tend to closes options or reduces potential for life, but it's supposed to be an investment, not a sacrifice for nothing. All that is particularly true for luxury; everything to some extent.

As for 3D modeling (and things needing big processing power), the resulting drawings will be sent through the net to be modelized by adequately tremendously powerful computers associated as the central computer of reality. We'll have 3D artists everywhere, and they will need fantastic power, and doing that by plugging everybody's computers to the net to tap their processor power when they do nothing is more complicated, need more communication bandwidth, more electricity, and production of faster degrading parts, than making a gigantic "simple" processor stash.

Evidently we won't be able to have high capacity of everything at first, we'll do things for 100 000 or a million people, then we'll test and grow from that as we see fit in order of priorities. And that applies to the whole system; you don't make it for the billions of people composing a final reality, you do it for an acceptable starting mass of people who have, or really want, a different mentality; starters must be the most motivated people around, no depressive people here.

That's how you can succeed at making it, if not you'll lose yourself in fancy starting complexities, work like crazy for eternity for a result that won't fit because people are supposed to evolve with the system. It is the only way you can get a final transferable systematization that humanity can get back in quickly whatever happens too, or start a civilization faster on another planet. A systematization made from profiting, competition, war, patching or improvising will never be transferable, it is condemned to earth at best, and any new way is better start from scratch, and whatever I hate this one we're all humans here, and I tend to consider people who say they've been had, it can be hard, and good on humility...

Processing power priorities are not for chess players "gods" to tap in processor power mindlessly; these kind of things are the last of our priorities. Play chess on your computer if you want to waste an infinity of time to let a computer take a random limited extrapolated decision that doesn't means intelligence at all, and on both side at it if you can only do chess deductions; not even a computer worth, only a game playing skill we can stuff in a computer...It's like the big IQ thing, you can stuff that in a computer, a selective limitation that proves you aint got the brains to understand that intelligence cannot be limited to filling a test, or to a single form, or to numbers calculated by a computer, even if they do measure the performance aspects of it and are important for comparison. You can dream of making an intelligent computer all you want, just the suggestion, particularly made by people who take the credit of tagging themselves as intelligent, that computers can be intelligent is a proof that you are intellectually deficient. Drop your intelligent computers dream of running humanity with living independent computers you cannot control, you believe too much in your Hollywood movies, start programming the new reality to make some use of your wasted abilities, it will be less of an hassle than making an intelligent computer pooling its intelligence from a selection where I'm not, and the result will truly be extraordinary.

But no problem at all if you play stuff between people through the net since it is your computer that does the number crunching work. Next, no more networking, networks pass by the plug, you plug your computer and you are on a network with anybody in the reality. Distance may lower efficiency and that's all. Our power priority will be for the systematization of reality, its "live" continually working algorithms and programs, second priority is to give power to the creation process; your computer do the work of making the creativity come alive, but you'll need external massive power to process the bigger stuff to a final result.

When you see an electric plug, any plug reality wide, you'll automatically connect to the net with your personal file, bandwidth values given, and you'll recharge at the same time. The system for batteries will be made for long life. Once plugged, you'll have access to all advanced communication technologies like camera, live shows etc, evidently, your power wire doesn't need to be bigger than the need of the device, like the wire of your table lamp is smaller than the one of an oven. You'll have space on your portable computer but that doesn't need to be vast. Once you've installed a game, you don't need to keep it stashed on your computer forever, you'll have space for a few big games and many smaller ones, but when you pass months without touching a game then it may not be necessary to keep it; it can be downloaded back fast enough to eliminate that need, and since everything is associated, you won't need to run around the net watching pub to get the latest patch; it will be immediately downloaded with the game, but you still need space for installed programs. That means you'll have a lot of bandwidth as a basis, so the heavy traffic structure may be better with parts made of superconductors with fiber optics bundled to plugs.

When you disconnect your computer, you'll have auto access to limited air communication with the net as a basis, mainly GPS, text and sound; small bandwidth needs and limited download capacity. Sufficient for moving people, but if you need more airborne capacity, then you'll pay for it. Now, I'm not a fan of high frequency pollution, they can affect living cells, and some people have sensitive to some frequencies and we don't want to pressure select them out by scrambling their brains...I'm personally very sensitive to some electricity frequencies if they are not well grounded, the more powerful fluorescent ones, I seem to attract and cumulate it for painful discharges, there was even a food store I couldn't go since I sparked every two steps through the plastic of the handle, and it was not a small spark, but a damn painful shock. I don't believe I'm the only one in such a situation, but the problem is in the high frequency added to sufficient wattage, since without wattage there is no pain and without high frequency there is no transmission of electricity through air, something like that, and that may even explain my allergy to white intensity, since color is a frequency, and that may explain other stranger phenomenon I remember with balls of electricity and making things work by approaching my finger, magic man, magic, powerman! Who sells the chain lightning spell? I remember a small experiment I made when I was young; if you want to know if there's "electricity" in the air, take a cheap LCD watch, remove the battery, solder 2 leads instead, take one between your fingers and let the other one act like an antenna, wave it around and the watch will write stuff...in Chinese, without a battery. As for white intensity giving me coughing, since I'm supposed to be Santa-Claus (St-Nicholas?), I may be wrong in my things somewhere, I think it is the intensity along with a need to cough, white doesn't affect me unless I want to cough, if it happens, then I seek the more intense white than the one I'm under to start it, or I close my eyes and suddenly open them to white, but nothing beats the long fluo tubes, they are a guarantee.
So we'll make frequency noise as quiet as possible even if we won't eliminate it, even home wires produce some, that's why we'll build wire circulation in walls at the same height power plugs are presently. No more phone wires and cables of all kind crisscrossing everywhere behind walls where you never know if you're not preparing a fire by planting that nail, or if you're not sleeping with your face an inch from one; you already got enough frequency noise, even if it is insignificant in power, with all the technology around, you don't need to go to sleep with a power wire in the face.

The basis provides good bandwidth for a single unit to everybody, if you plug more than one computer with your identity on the net and start downloading or watching live digital stuff on them all, you may have to buy more bandwidth unless you tolerate slowdowns.

I'll describe more fully the basis system as I write, but as you can see it's is a very expensive thing. And I'm very far from finished adding to it, I'll continually add expensive stuff as I write, like apartments, yes, you will have a free apartment to yourself for life whatever you do, not a socialist hole, but not luxury either. You'll have electricity too, transportation, etc. Apart from objects, there is a basic amount of credits allocated to every facets of the wellbeing of our citizens; everybody without an exception have this basis, but there's a minimal amount of work that must be done for that, as it is an unbelievably costly thing. For now, you understand why we have other priorities than taking care of criminals and enriching people.

You can't have everything, and that's why if this reality tries to end poverty the system will crash; its basic historical priorities lies elsewhere, and everything have been built systemized interdependent with those old ideals or philosophies in mind, and the result is the present reality. Depressing, isn't it? That's how deep in trouble this reality and its "loving" humanity is, try giving life to another reality in this pile of fantastic systemized eternal and condemning problems, whatever your intents or argumentation you're set to reap hate if you change a set order of things, or liberty condemnations. As an example, where will you find space for the new reality without stumbling on people who personally possess a piece of land that god sold them? How will you remove them from there? The guy may decide to fight for his rights and never move, and so the land is condemned unless you fight him and that can be very expensive. Now, what if you need space taken by a country since all space is taken by one? The land is condemned to the country, and why would they let you decide what to do with it? You will probably have to take it by force, by war, violence, death; the way it was probably taken when you think about it...

Before continuing, I'll have to describe in more details the integration of the computer and communication structure. To do this, I'll write about personal identity. Only people identified as a part of the life reality can profit fully from it. To become citizens of the new reality you'll need an identity and since you can't have two identities, that means you are under the laws and revenues limits of the life reality; anything that goes over that is transferred as credits and added to the total of the reality.

You will be able to travel wherever you want, to some extent, you'll be able to exchange your credits for money and vice-versa; we will need to buy stuff from father reality, from simple items to industries and pieces of lands, we'll need all our strength for ourselves so help (mean) from father reality will have to take the form of done production as much as possible, like we produced the stuff, the goal is to keep our economy as independent as possible in a situation of total dependence. So for as long as we're not totally self-sufficient, and that can take a hundred year or even more, father reality will have to fill the holes of our evolution if we want the accelerated version. Anyway, we'll accept any help that fit our view, it's just to say that you cannot ask a newborn to be the savior of anything but his own skin. Besides, the risk I see or fear in the future comes from this reality, there will probably be a few chain reactions of different factors that will truly put humanity at risk in the next hundred years, and you know some of these. We won't be responsible for these things.

Every citizens of our reality will have an inviolable identity, it must be impossible to duplicate or usurp this identity, it is the most important thing for all for us, it is our connection to the reality; it says who, how or what we are or did or want. Without an absolutely safe identity assigned to people, forget about it. Doubling or stealing an identity is a crime no better than killing, modifying it is not much better. Good people don't die at the hands of criminals, good people don't double either, a ghost is no better than a dead (maybe a little better, or a lot worse, depends on which dimension you stand...). It may be hard or complex to arrange things for such a safe identification system to exist, but I'm sure it can be done.

What's more, it must be fast at recognizing an identity. It can be a scan of your eyes with a number known by heart or a scan of a code bar on your wrist, or a microchip under your skin. I prefer the chip, but it will have to be limited to identification and nothing else, unless some personally want a GPS version, like some criminals and sick people. I don't know if that's the best option, but it will have to be safe and fast, the communication system and search engine will have to be efficient.

The exception is cameras recognition, we don't want that, camera systems will be highly limited to people in our reality, no cameras in streets, no spying satellites, only personal (that can be businesses), police and television cameras. We'll prove we can live and be good people without this. Less production, less pollution, I can be as ugly as I want, and you have nothing to do watching my personal life, in fact, this feeling of being watched is another sick effect of this ideology that wants a class of people, those who don't care to test the law and those who particularly care (the 2 extremes), to live with a broom up their ass, by thinking they are continually watched by god, and this camera mania is a reflection of this. I should mention that I reserve myself the right to not like it at all to be judged for things that only concern the existence that has been given to me, and this right is universal, and only the UI has the right to tell me to go fuck myself with my universal rights! But the UI doesn't think and judge like people... So to me nobody is supposed to be watching me, unless I do evil, because it would imply another living being (2 existentials meeting forces a change of state on the automatic interstate, but you can do that manual too), that is, whatever I attract the attention of the whole universe.

I think that doesn't work after all, because you can't prevent judgment from living entities, and you can't prevent wrong judgment with life too, so in conclusion it's more probable that it's all in the hands of automated systems, your whole history is recorded but only available to you, and you decide the level and form of your own judgment, which in turn will decide where you end-up (seen as inversed requirement). That's better, so you look at yourself and by hiding stuff you're not proud and showing your best, you decide where you can go dimensionally speaking, evidently.

And forget about having 20 cards, your cards will become a virtual thing and disappear because all you'll have and need is an identity, that's all. If you think you need more than that go to the other reality; living with all kind of banks or credit cards or whatever else panoply of special member bonus card in your stuffed wallet is an intelligence sign that you're living in a dividing and competing reality where everybody tries to steal from everybody else, and probably you got an implanted mentality that shouldn't please me along with it too...

The identification system will take the form of an access to different parts of a single personal file; you'll have everything about you in there, all paperwork, it will be the "virtual" you, and there can't be two of the thing either; if that happens, one is flushed. It's like everybody will have a personal internet site, and all what pass through the net and concern you will be in your personal file.

If you buy food, nobody except you may see what credits you have available, you will see the information with a push release button, which will make the information appear as long as you keep your finger on it, if you didn't lock the function. You will have lock-down power over most of the different areas of your personal file, meaning that if you want nobody to see your account, you can lock its access so only you can see it at home, but those services that need to be sure of your account won't be available to you unless you unlock the information for that specific use. If you want to buy something from credit over a year, more information will have to be shown, like your whole account data by pushing another button or your work data by pushing another one.

The principle is simple; once you're identified you can show whatever part of your personal file to a vendor by pressing a push button on a handheld pad like a card reader with a small screen (vendors got their own screens for size). You'll have the identification and access system as interfaces for your basis computer too since your personal file is both in your computer and on the central computer, and last update take over old ones. And you don't need your basis computer to access your personal file, in fact, people who don't want a basis computer or those who scrap or lose them may not be given another one, but they'll still be citizen of the life reality as long as they can be identified; they can adjust their personal file once in a while and forget about it if they want. And that can apply to the basis of comfort; those who don't want it under this form can have it differently, but the compensation may be less.

Another way of seeing it is that you start as citizen incognito, then you can unlock or lock any part of your file which simply disappears, even if it still exist, from the net since it is a 2 part read only, you can access it, you will carry it with you on your personal computer, you decide everything about it and the effect is direct, but you cannot copy it or any information in it. To copy it on a new computer you buy you'll have to pass through reality's system, then the new computer will now carry your identity. Even if you can make your computer available to everybody, only you can access your personal file.

It is criminal to copy it, we don't like criminals in our reality, all kind of bad things happen to them, no luck left for the style, and no money left to spend on you, even if we know that there will always be some (criminals), and we tolerate some level of "sin". Just don't forget we have hunters of all kind and we have easy access to guns and armor, we learn to use these things as a basis in youth, men and women alike, with group strategies too, so if you think we're creating a reality of peace and love imbeciles, wake-up, we are growing highly versatile independent people that are happy to work together and kick some evil.

When you lose citizen status you can't survive in our reality anyway, no personal file, no credits, and even if we let you use your personal file, doing so would reveal your position (a necessity for the system). So grave criminals are stuck because if you got no personal file in our reality, then we won't ask questions if we find your cadaver, as long as it was not tortured, but if we find a citizen of our reality assassinated, then an investigation will take place and the minimum sentence is a loss of citizenship status somewhere.

The only exception to file security is reality's reasons and credibility. Different structures of reality will be given access of specific facets of it. The brain must know its parts unless there is no new reality, you have no right to hide who you are to the reality, it need to know as much as possible about you for all kind of enhancements and help and problem solving for the entity that is life with humanity, like knowing who the criminals are for a start, could be useful... But unless a crime is detected or found, nobody will transmit some locked information; you can lock your financial part to who you want, but the reality needs to see it unless you don't get paid. Any drain on the "bottle" (credits spent) is associated to a person, the reality needs to see the financial status of people, and we need to be able to follow a subtracted amount anywhere since that amount is related to a personal file. If you are scared to show your financial status, then stay in a reality where you have opportunities to hide important stuff. We will see the worth in life energy (time) of anybody as a final easy number, we are done with hiding and headache complexity, you can't hide that because it is exist under a commune accord of knowing the quantity and where it's going if you are to associate it to some value of good or judgment. If we, as a community make ourselves a monetary systems based on a pile of 100 rocks divided as a value we give to people, then you can't lose sight of a single of those rocks, they are a community pile, and everybody have and should have its eyes on it, if one disappears it is immediately applied as an unfairness value of evil. But that's just the basic idea, here we're in hell, so there's a lot of experience gained in trickery and deception, so whatever I say doesn't make sense, in fact, here the rocks disappear and reappear somewhere else divided in 2, painted and tainted, refurbished, recycled and perverted; it's what happens when you decide competition in the law governing its distribution... It means if there is one place where we'll have to be strict it's there, it is where society takes its responsibility with fairness. Credits are always taken from everybody so everybody have the right to know the truth of its circulation, every fucking cent of it. What people do with it is another matter, it's your choice to make that information available, but the store or service still show on what its money went, as bulk numbers, what people have a right to know is that the credits ended up in your hands and you spent them on something that is none of our business, unless you used it for crime (that's why I hate algorithms of AI bullshit, that downright spy on me to push specific products and entertainment, this autosuggestion manipulation shit should be illegal, this reality is doing exactly the contrary, it tries to make it normal to rape people's intimacy and fucking insert its judgment and pressures and suggestions, I hate the whole internet and TV industry for it, categorize your fucking pub and leave my mind alone!). Information about your salary will be shown in as many relations as necessary, so someone seeking a job at a place will see the pay of every employees, as an example. But that's specific, your personal file is yours, you show what you want of it, I'm just saying an employer will show your salary data, and reality (the system) got no choice but to know with whom it is dealing with.

You can do a lot with checking cases parameters, but we'll want multi level security and alternative options too, so you will have a personal chest with 3 layers in your file too, a place where you can further protect information quickly by simple drag and drop, like things you buy, or places you went to, the world doesn't need to know you bought a dildo, so you can drag the transaction to your chest, and the different layers are levels of protection, the first layer is a selection for close "friends", the second layer is nobody's business, and the third levels is closed condemned; almost nobody in the reality have the right to even ask you to unlock it, it is a crime to pressure someone to open it, you'll never ever know what your love placed in there, only the police or system can view it in exceptional scenarios, and the system can make statistics out of it, like everything else, but not show it. In a sense it is the last frontier before deletion, a place i would use to find humility looking at these pieces of your creation.

A breach will be ultimately punished, like if a person that is part of a structure profit from the fact that it can read your locked information to transmit it for whatever form of profit. What is at the bottom 2 layers will be auto deleted upon death unless specified otherwise by the person. And don't go nuts because people are permitted to have secrets, did you read well how I see independence, individuality and good and evil? The most evil is produced at mass scale, that's where I'm making a paranoia about liars, nowhere else, so don't twist my things. There is a huge difference between 2 people lying to each other, and doing it at a massive scale, that's why people dealing with masses, in a good reality, must be the most globally worthy and exemplary. And dealing with masses is as much entertainment as it is an industry producing stuff for millions of people.

What make a civilization evil is not personal lies or injustices, it is what is done at civilization level, systemized unfairness, or lying to masses thus affecting their judgment, mass killing, mass violence, mass imprisonment, mass manipulations, or mass fines from invalid arguments, and that can be personal lies from people having an exemplary responsibility toward a group. I could say "transparency" must be proportional to means and popularity; you are a criminal if you reap mass popularity from falsehood, except when it is known as such, like movies. What can modify the judgment of masses on a subject that concern them must be known as truth; it should be a crime to manipulate the judgment of masses with lies, but in this reality's state of things, there is so much mass PMBBD everywhere that incarcerating all the people distributing some would crash the whole system, most politicians and media people would go to prison, and the selection that is made to fit this hell would become crazy in its mind conflicts, massive revolt and war would follow.

As for transparency, that's a manipulative term, transparency is seeing through something physical, nothing else, the true word to use is truth. Media people and politicians continually twist everything to fit their view, trying to make selected evils a cute thing or a ridiculous one or an insignificant one; you want to know the truth of things, that's all, why involve transparency? It has nothing to do there, people are not more or less transparent, they lie more or less, and manipulating the truth or hiding it is lying, and it can be disastrous when it affects the judgment of masses, which were supposed to kick your ass from the truth but they won't be because you lied, thus twisting their judgment and reality. But there are exceptions, I should add, there are many popular people really trying to tell the truth or do the integrity thing, so maybe I shouldn't generalize too much, but isn't it what generalizing means? "in general".

There won't be a single person without communication in our reality, except people who want it, we will have extraordinary powerful communication system that will permit the creation of a super data storage "central" computer, which will in turn lower the need for people to make stashes of data, needing less production in that area; they will make stashes of shortcuts instead. And a categorizing and filtering engine will make sure there always exist two copies of data, in a different data stashing object, and no more than whatever is judged necessary. Most of your data have not much uses filling hard drives at home when you know it's safe and as easily accessible.

We must not be too dependent from earth externals, dependence can bring catastrophic results if the supply lines are shorted, so if power can be generated on the moon it will mostly be spent there, the same for the communication system; we must not be dependent from that, it can bring fantastic power, but if it falls down and you made yourself dependent, then you'll be in grave troubles. Understand that space don't like shaky projects for profits, don't think you're supposed to spread in space anyway, it is a privilege and incompetents flop it out there, it is even doubtful that we can develop the attitude to survive on one of the best place in the galaxy, so don't overestimate yourself in hype too much, you'll end-up depressed and worsen your situation by needing more entertainment as a consolation prize.

I'd say the present satellite net is ok for some time, no need to add more, but we should attach it together for better efficiency by removing country satellite competition as a first step for more massive association; all channels should become international using a single pipeline instead of a million profit stashers, I'm giving you loads of jobs no? Associate man! You can call it centralization if you want, but Democracy-capitalism competition twisted this word to feel negative in our mind, like centralization is bad like socialism, , and, without knowing why, you'll probably answer "yes...I...yes". Association leads to centralization, so wake-up, do the best of it, or the worst for profits. The wrongs of centralization appears when some dude debark and start making a powertrip or applying austerity to become more competitive economically. You centralize to bring more advantages to life, not inconvenient, or to fill your pockets, what makes centralization bad is incompetence or inappropriate tree of priorities.

In fact I'll give you one special lesson on centralization as I make my super mobile, even detachable, worst, a freaking super centralization that's supposed in theory to be a super harder thing to get its ass moving, that's actually fly-enable? That's a lot of legerity and swiftness for such a heavy thing, maybe it's because it actually make sense, its parts work together, it is a whole animal, and like life it can ultimately reproduce!

So association is the word, hard to twist to something negative unless you exaggerate. And you don't associate things that don't work together or the puzzle will end up quite bizarre, and yes it is a puzzle, the puzzle of existence, so mathematicians and physicians are better strap themselves solid, there are pieces beyond your imagination to cope with. But I'm sure there are many presently that are way beyond Einstein, why not? Are you humble? I want you on the job along tons of programmers! It's hard to do a better job than this no? Those people have a tendency to like to do their job well, and you don't hear from them at the ton, while they're among the most valuable.

While work is done to associate and categorize things better, and more, we'll develop plans for the production of a bundle of super sturdy and versatile satellites, a dozen (24 is not many, just compare), separated in two groups working under different principles doing the same thing but doubling power or bandwidth capacity as each satellite set can work independently. For that we'll need to associate science better in truth, too many little advantages, little secrets, little lies, this reality is full of little hidden important secrets. Then the old net of "experimental" country competition satellites can slowly die by itself, maybe collect back some that are worth it.

Entropy forces us to use a minimum of independent devices; if the sky net fails but everything is arranged so that the only negative effect to people is a slowdown in some communication facets, then good, we're not dependent from one or the other, if the sky net crashes, it was mostly luxury we'll want back, but the ground wire based communication is sufficient, or the satellite one too, both are better. We will build a serious "be done with it" wire based communication system, but we'll still need to work as much as we can from all the diversity of "experimental" land communication profiting structure that currently exists, recycling stuff before it degenerates when we can, while we get rid of all these garbage antennas for profit laying everywhere and polluting the air with frequency garbage, we'll have enough of the satellites to do that, no need to scramble people's brains. It causes no problem to nobody doing things well, only to profiteers.

We won't stuff space with throng of short lived satellites. Presently, the same attitude is used in space as on earth where almost anybody can send a satellite if it can be a source of profit or help the economy of the country. Only self-interests count, and since no poor send satellites in space, this time profiteers cannot dump their responsibility. Maybe I'm wrong, they'll answer it's a matter of demand, not their responsibility, it's demand! Easy to say when most demand is created with tons of PMBBD...

The result, as always, may end-up catastrophic; we are polluting space with tons of little or fragile satellites that can't last 100 years while growing a dependence to them, and we pay big money for that while most will quickly be out of order, and you'll be lucky if no accident ends-up creating an exponential chain reaction of increasing quantity of debris. We must stop sending crap satellites in space right now, before science for profit slowly condemns humanity, in another way, to very limited options, which are not the best because we didn't act in the best manner. I understand the need to experience things, but let's not exaggerate, a better attitude would have prevented most garbage satellites from existing, all of which should never have been sent in orbit, think how much rare resources and rocket launches would have been saved...We have to place fewer but bigger, sturdier, more complete, associated and with a longer lifespan satellites, solely for communication or important science projects, not send satellites out of country competition.

Having at least a few powerful communication satellite of our own in geosynchronous orbit would be a big plus to accelerate the expansion and security of our new reality too since we'll have all kind of security and inefficiency troubles if we are depend from country competition stuff; there is no use being given a piece of land in china if we can't have a powerful secure and personal communication channel with the place, minimally.

The priority will be to permit every cell (person) to always have efficient communication with the central if they want, we will have a lot of people everywhere in the woods, and they will need connection. Along with that, we will want to minimize telephone poles and wires of all kind laying everywhere, these things scrap the décor, even dishes are prettier; the only reason dishes are seen as uglier is because of competitive BBMPD, and it is the ones that got the ugliest setup that complains because the setup contain a bunch of interdependent profiting gangs all attached to the same ugly and old from the beginning wooden poles that have never seen a level and are so stuffed with chemical preservatives that they can last almost as long as that tomato 2000 in my fridge. I don't know what they put on it, but nothing living wants to eat it, not even me, I just observe the thing and wait for signs of decomposition; soon they'll be like plastic and we'll have to recycle them. I'm exaggerating but I personally don't like poles planted as obstacles in streets everywhere, not much dishes either, that's why dishes will not be a profiting industry; they are not needed except for connection safety while adding bandwidth.

Land wire based communication will be connected to cell towers, which will be planted with dishes, which will connect to satellites. With that we'll have all the communication we'll ever need. We'll want to optimize the strength of each of the 3 systems, (satellite, cellular, wire), while providing independence capacity. That way, if a part of a system fails another one takes over, the worst price is a temporary slowdown.

What about wireless networking? It shouldn't exist, a system like I just explained completely eliminate the need for this, in fact, many systems presently exist solely to enrich a competitive gang. And yes, any other philosophy will be very difficult to implement in this reality because everything is made to fit the competitive philosophy, but the little theoretical surface advantages some will boast, are vastly overcompensated by the negative aspects. I said the advantages are theoretical because adepts of this reality will sure not take into consideration the technological retards created by the philosophies of this reality, and they don't have another reality to compare, so what we have may as well be the worst options in all aspects; speed, performance, cost, pollution, safety, complexity. I should add mind effects too, for some systems, I know for one that I'm sensitive to some frequencies, sometimes intensely. These devices won't exist in our reality, and networking will go through the wall plug. That applies to remote speakers systems too, we'll have to patent them to use the wall plug to receive the data. You begin to understand the bandwidth needs for our plugs, all communication, planetary as well as home, will go through these plugs, and automatic at it; if a device is meant to communicate with another device, and the plug is not too complex, then it will be part of the wall plug. Exceptions to this are devices requiring complex plugs that wouldn't work well over long distances, and technologies that are not at their best "connector" developments (technologies evolve, but you can deduct if a plug or interface tech is there to stay, like the 120V plug, or the mouse), like your high resolution computer screen; it's hard to have your graphic card wire interface longer than a few meters without needing more complex parts and systems, and the plug is still changing. But it would be cool to eliminate this damm wire between your screen and graphic card (computer); you plug the computer in the power socket, you plug the television in another power socket and that's it, detected automatically, no hassle, you can start a movie on your computer immediately and it will show on your television if you want. Some will sing wireless, but they don't understand the stability needs and power and pollution aspects, why do you think your screen is not wireless already, so close to your computer? It would fry your brain probably, and ruin you in batteries, wireless computer screens, but you'll have them with your portable... All that to say we want a minimum of industrials of the wires plated gold to satisfy divided competition and make rich communication corporations.

And no need for justification since the net is supposed to be the network, and that's a ridiculous thing now, worthless production and pollution. I'll add that these devices are bad because they don't work with a dish; dishes strengthen a weak signal while upload don't spread if tube devices are used; wireless networking devices are too strong, say that I'm crazy all you want, but I believe these things will someday affect our mind very negatively, but the worst setup is still a dish plugged to a wireless network system. Respect other people and keep your stuff to yourself is what I say, but we won't have this paranoia in our reality. I don't like microwave antennas either, but no problem with remote impulse devices like keyboards, TV remote control since they are not heavy load and cannot be decoded as information. Now, I'm no expert, and I don't need to since there is no need for wireless networking in our reality.

We shouldn't need more than a few good satellites, and with a very large bandwidth, cell towers for walking needs, and earth based communication infrastructure like a long range fiber optics and superconductor communication system. That will eliminate all those funky communication antennas that overload the sky in frequency pollution which I believe far more dangerous for our health than those profit gangs want us to believe. The earth based system must be simple and efficient, and tremendous bandwidth is the goal, see it as the spine cord of the reality, since we're supposed to be doing a living reality here, do you like it when somebody starts stuttering? No you don't, you tolerate. I don't want to tolerate stuttering computers, when I ask something of that machine, I want it immediately, and I don't want crashing cells (HD's and programs) all over the world...

To go back to ugliness, I have a different opinion of wind generators that are eliminated from the décor from the same ugliness mental autosuggestion PMBBD from power corporations that surely don't want you to produce your own power, so ugly poles are prettier, wind devices scrap the pole décor, and we accept the load of bullshit with a smile.

Wind devices are flowers, they move, they turn, people even plant little colorful ones on their lawns, and why do you think? Because the wind device is ugly? And people have always been proud to plant them on the roof of barns, wind devices, and that's the first thing you notice and like about the barn. We'll want to produce diversity and color for those, they will be our "ugly" things, you can plant a proximity detector for security, which will stop the blades if someone gets near, so no need to go kaputt with steel cages. And some people will probably get killed, but if someone crashes on one, it is not the fault of the device even if power corporations will pay an "expert" to say "see, it's dangerous! Look at these numbers!" I say people crash anywhere there is something, you're supposed to know somewhere that you should not crash on a power corporation pole, but people have been dying at the ton doing it. Now, you don't need to exaggerate, but you can't break the décor of a balcony is what I say, even if everybody had a wind device attached, it would break the decor no more than the balcony itself; it is a feature of the building.

So we'll want to see acceptable sized device for cities, so things look usual, but you don't plant gigantic ones, because their prominence added to the smaller ones will make it look like fan city. And you don't need to take balcony space either, the building can be made to provide a bunch of slot on the roof for those who want one, but I still have no problem with balcony and lawn devices, and you don't have to imagine white ones all over, think flower or chameleon if you want, different blade sets, brown ones for brown blocks, things like that. And that's not the sole option, if solar power devices become efficient enough versus price, resources and pollution, I see nothing wrong with spreading some everywhere.

As for using the power of such devices efficiently, you don't see it in a personal accumulator way, the reality can put an emphasis on providing some sector or building accumulators, you see it as a whole system to which individual devices add wattage, the wattage people provide to the system is removed from their cost in electricity. And we bundle necessary wires in advance, meaning that power and communication are on the same plug as a 4-5, or even 6 holes power plugs if need be, but we must think of that before starting building the reality, make it as perfect as we can, it is a power plug, and it will take all its meaning there, it will be capable of receiving and providing current as well as data, just don't make it slack. Tradeoff on wire size or setting can exist if they are well made, you don't need 2 grounds, or you can standardize, or morph 2 wires into one if different frequencies work well together on the same one. What I want is good thinking before starting, if 100 volts 70 hertz is better to our bundled ways than 120 volts, then please don't wait until we're deep in production to say it. As for the plugs, the holes can be angled for selectivity, a device don't need to have a power wire with 5 leads if it uses 3, the form of the plug will dictate things.

I'll come back to these subjects a few time, but that's about how we'll see communication and power, as a part of reality, you are born with these things, it's part of being a human now, it's you and the machine learning to trust and understand each other's capacities. Businesses on these aspects will be greatly limited, but we'll still encourage technology exploration and developments. Don't think that kind of communication needed people dreaming of richness to be discovered; technology advances whatever the reality, people would have come to communicate like that without someone to make a mega stash out of it while working all their might to make it a cultural thing to condemn people to their account...People will be connected like in another dimension now.2/8

As I already tested previously, I'll prefer if we change "money" for its true term which is "credits". Sounds crazy or childish? I don't think so, but you know there are a lot of adults who like to play games with child graphics and they're the only game they'll ever play, are they children for that? I bet they never noticed they were collecting rings instead of money...And I know that there is animation that you could qualify as childish that has the competence to reach adults profoundly.

But that's not the point, we're not making kiddie reality, and credits sounds totally mature and appropriate to me, and after living a hundred years with credits instead of money, maybe changing credits for money will be the thing that doesn't make sense, since I believe crediting someone for his time spent at a task is closer to the truth than using money which is easier to pervert to anything. And it goes hand in hand with our philosophy of a simpler reality basis of understanding, so people don't end up wrong in their opinion of it, or adapt until they barely recognize where they're from (as a reflection of how much they had it all wrong). When children will grow up in a reality with credits, I believe they'll have a stronger attachment to what it implies, they'll understand better what it means and its worth...Now, if you don't like "credits" replacing money, you can forget about it and do the same with others notions I'm trying to place well, but if you modify too many concepts or minimise important ones you will grow a different reality than the original vision, or face long term heavy mind conflicts, or slowly slip back in the embrace of hell...

I don't know what they teach people at school concerning money, but it looks like all of them economists and money stashers, shakers, inflators, mixers and growers don't have the slightest notion of what money is, what it is for, and how to use it, whatever their big intellectual "education" of capitalism and socialism and left and right. I won't say there aren't great geniuses in there, in a different world of understanding where I can only wait in boring humility, but it's like being a genius at programming in a language while not knowing how chips work fundamentally. Their notion of an "economy" doesn't even seem to include the basics of it which people should have learned around 12. As a matter of fact, even the word "economy" is a twisted view of the truth, economy means saving means for things, while they're doing the contrary across the board, indebting everybody to their system. So while they sing to and fro about "the" economy, they should focus on the truth of the word which is "our economies"; where in hell are our economies? Well, under the control of those who represent the priorities of the population, in nice theory, to skip saying that the part needed to make things fair is stolen by the way of the system itself to permit some to stash billions or live in senseless luxuries and doing secret activities. But they'll answer that they have to pay someone to have their luxuries, someone must be paid to build them a castle or a yacht, or to have "love" with them, they "permit" some people to live, we are privileged to have jobs, they even think they are the job creators, they are good, we should thank them for our survival! Yes, that's capitalism, and such peoples are mostly all counterproductive toward good goals, I'm not talking their business, I'm talking the person, rich sitting people playing with numbers, even if they are productive toward satisfying all their senseless desires, using tons of resources and creating tons of pollution, and I'm not exploring their hidden bad side...

I'll flush all that and start back at the beginning, take a different path, simplify. In fact, unneeded complexification of reality basics is a problem since it will take a longer time understanding the reality, retarding the age at which you truly reach adulthood, and it is a limiting factor in global mind development. I'm talking about reality basics, not all the stuff that spring from the reality, like history or games or names or fun or imagination, I'm talking about the reality's functioning that should always be the less complex possible to be available for understanding to a maximum of people quickly and easily in life. Gaining a global understanding of reality as you develop your skills globally too will give all kind of good effects, like less frustrations, less of a feeling of being cheated, less stress, your mind will be freer to develop skills as complex as you want, you can find many infinitively complex things to do or learn to the point of sinking your life in understanding them and we'll want people who do it for different goals than to profit from the system.

People who retard the understanding of reality on purpose are criminals of the worst kind since the older you get, the more you accumulate a momentum, everything comes to fall into place if you have the will for it, and once they do you're dealing with a package of interrelated limitations that makes it very difficult to take a different path, it's one way the mind lose malleability too, so as you optimize your energies for your goal you form your condemnation. The mind got too many "battles" that are past things too, and it is too much work to backtrack every developments and interrelations arising from these old "battles" and reality adaptations, it wants peace, safety, assurance; nobody likes to know he's been wrong all his life, particularly when it's too complex to change, most people will even want to fight in reality to prove they are still right because it is less hard than to change their mentality. Still, in this reality, most become blind workers, neutrals swaying their butts left and right as they follow the will of the system, and so they'll hardly become independent adult individuals, except at some cosmetic details. Then they'll displace, contort, frustrate on all the wrong things, even see independence as doing stupidities, and that's without talking about the conflict created by going against the logics of life.

We put too much of an emphasis on teaching the tricks that can be used to make profits too, or to sustain business by scraping money everywhere, or compare between profiting strategies of different governments. Competition, the psychology of employment, manipulation strategies; economic classes and books produce among the worst people of this reality, and it seems they don't even tell or know the fundamental truth of money, is it on the internet? Probably, but for now they think it is something produced by governments or banks, while it is not. So, for economists and all their gangs, dump your computer models and grab some notebooks, as I explain the basics of the good way of money, unless you prefer the bad way...

First, we'll have to start do I have to redefine what a debt is? A debt is a debt, it is something you owe to someone, and one way or the other, a debt is supposed to be reimbursed, not forever increase. At the extreme of a country debt, it is presently dependent from production potential, but why would you sell potential? To condemn future people to a system, and that is not a good thing to me. The other factor is the value of the country, so to reimburse you just have to sell half of the US but wouldn't that be ridiculous? I bet you'd prefer war. Others will say we just have to print money, that banks are makers of money and that everybody else borrows it, but that's a lie, and I don't care what book like the bible manipulated people to think that, but that's still a lie; money is human life energy (time) spent at doing something valuable, nothing else. Next, for those who think the monopoly game is how money works, you are totally wrong, monopoly is a game that twist the truth of money too, again, it encourages the belief that some "gods" create money and people are slave to the institution.

In old times, if I did a job for you, you'd thank me by giving me something; that was bartering. But maybe you have nothing that can be useful to me, so I would prefer if you credited me something in the future, or maybe I could exchange it at the marketplace; that's money; crediting for an action or object, a debt elimination, simple isn't it? So people and governments needed an institution to standardize it and to control it, banks were created to do that job.

It's wrong to say that money "appeared" with gold as a standard, no, gold was just a preferred object on display that people exchanged stuff for, something valuable of transportable size that is equivalent to a bag of potato, so our guy can run to another vendor and exchange for something different, or guarantee future stocks. And it grew, little bags of potatoes at the bottom of rivers, and at some point someone decided to make it a standard exchange medium, because of the difficulty and control involved in securing it and its adequate rarity. The difference between an exchange system, an economy, and a monetary system, which implies physical money or not? If not then stop fooling around, money should disappear, replaced by credits, because it's in the name of crediting people a fair value for stuff that money came into being, so yes, I'll concede that under the form the credit system took as money I can qualify it as not very ideal, but on another planet they could still use metal money in a good way and we'd be wrong to assume their money is all twisted too. You will say that this is not important but it is and it concerns billions of people, it begins at what you teach, the base of your understanding, so we should stop suggesting that money is a replacement for a bartering system, or an independent thing, it is a facet of a credit system, the form it took for some time. As for the reward system, it permits the credit system to apply itself in a less strict manner, as long as it's still governed by fairness principles; it becomes a generality where you can be credited for anything (a job can be anything), so don't get confused they work together as one, or as two interlacing parts where the survival system has a strong presence too, to tempt the devil, but really, they are 3 things having their own agendas and they feel obliged to use the power of the credit system to reach their best forms, ok?

Be done with this already, everything spring from there, it is not the banks or government that make money, it is the people that spend their time or energy working and they all bow to the same scheme of "fairness" that gives a value in numbers to this or that job, and the government takes a part of that money for more direct priorities and global services (in theory). All the rest are under products of that fundamental truth. If you absolutely want to believe banks or governments create money, then yes they do in the sense that they took control of the institution that make it safe (usable), they print it proportionally to the quantity and needs of workers. Evidently, things became all twisted through millennia of manipulations by all kind of people to competition over it, but the fundamental truth of money will never change; it is simply a crediting system of human life energy time spent at this or that, it is a system to reward some activities more than others; if you remove that, you remove a fundamental drive of humanity; its reward system, unless you want to go back bartering with actual objects. Now, too bad if some people took decision control of the reward system, that's bad, but it comes with this reality so no way out of it, and it will only worsen until the end of humanity. I guess it was manipulated to crap by some old leaders, then caste societies, then it was taken from them by banks, whatever, it is neither the people nor good principles that decide the reward system, it is ego competition and nothing else, and the goal is world hegemony, even if it only lead to division, horror, falsehood, war, etc...

So, reimbursing the debt just by printing money would only worsen things since money is human life energy (time) spent working. The only way to truly create money in this reality is with jobs, but the problem is that there will be forever be less jobs as we know them in the future, thanks to automation, and to our "ancestors" who built stuff. So you need people working at jobs, but how to create jobs? By creating goods or growth, for the present good aspect but since there is a limit to the latter, if you make your system dependent on growth, someday you will have to destroy with war to restart growth, that's in part what's happened after WW2 in some countries. You can destroy automation, or cause problems to people too, for the evil side of it, but what I mean is that a job can be anything, except what you decide not to value. We could have as a job the development of those ideals we want to attain, no need for competition, even if I wouldn't be against rewards that would encourage it here since I think people are natural competitors from the intrinsic of survival, there will always be everywhere, so all what you can do is make the best of it, and to me it is to put its emphasis on fun and games, life is already difficult as it is for most people, I don't like successful competitive people who think life is a game to worsen things on this aspect. But yes, maybe it could work well here, a kind of competition of human ideals for cultural societies, a bit like Olympics again, and the winners could have some infrastructure accelerated, or an upgrade for more population (like 10% 9%...).

I should add, for all those who think employment should be the most important thing to one's life, or that it's some kind of proof that you're good, that you are wrong, there are many evil jobs and they must not exist whatever they help the economy, next, laziness is not a sin, not caring can be though. Furthermore, unemployment as seen in this reality is totally normal and will always fluctuate because it values and make people for the skills it needs, if not you are seen as a weight, it's an extremist on-off thing and very limited vision of human potential where you must be profited from or you're a problem, that's the ego god ideology, of or not, personally I don't want to work like crazy, I want to live comfortably, I want the efforts to help life I make, including caring for myself, to be valuated, I want to help people around me, I want things, I want to know life is on my side, and I'm ready to do some work for that.

To me work can be anything (we pay people to be beautiful, then I don't know why we shouldn't pay people trying to make love succeed, or for the betterment of their minds and body, and not necessarily in a bodybuilder way), you could say that a big majority of my time is spent working because almost all what I do I do it with an afterthought for my work, I make myself better so I can serve life better, and even things like games I often play for a specific mind practicing effect. And what about those who say they like their job? And so, for those jealous people who hate me because they have too much bullshit in the brain, or judge me inadequately because I'm forced to live in the same environment as them (so it's a guarantee that they won't verify if I'm really trying to produce life advancement matters) I tell you to do what I do, I'm worthless? Then do what I do with adequate competence if you're so superior, because your job got a pay and mine not, worse, I probably do a job that is so difficult that almost nobody try to do it, in fact, I may as well do the most valuable job in existence, but I wouldn't say that to my neighbors, they'd choke laughing, they need TV, movies and politician to decide what is valuable...

The worst effect I witnessed are people who will want to work harder because that's the only argument they found to feel superior to me in their competitive mentality, absolutely, stupid moronic like that, some will even disrespect me for being a writer, they don't consider writing as work, to them books are not supposed to exist, kind of, unless I make money out of it evidently...They'll say that I'm wasting my life, can you believe that? Absolutely! Or worse, they'll use the situation of other countries as an argument to discredit my work, like saying that I'm lucky that I can profit from the system like that, because if I was living in the united states I would be dead if I didn't get a job, and they'll refuse to heed any argument I'll advance, and you can bet that they won't read my work, so I'm in face of a wall. Now, my arguments to do what I do are all over my work, I'm not doing this out of winning something (yes), or to compete among big adults, and I'm not motivated by envy, that's the first thing they refuse to understand. So it's not even a question of truly taking the means to be better, no, things are at a point where they do it to protect a feeling that they are better in their implanted competitive philosophy, they protect the impression that they are better, so they won't judge me from the tools I provide them, they'll prefer to judge me from their preconception and protect these to guarantee that they won't be wrong, it's like preventive denial!

Anyway, I want to live in a reality where boring and uninteresting jobs are automated, where I only do cool things, and where I'm rewarded if I take good attitudes. Where I'm coming to here is that a life respectful credit system will have to consider paying people for their whole effect toward as many aspects of their life as possible, and the monetary and life philosophy of this reality is inadequate for that, not only it's all wrong, but it is already incredibly complex, based on profiting competition, and adapting it to such a vision would ruin everything under costly complexity. Yet the fact remains that this vision of jobs I'm explaining will become reality one way or the other if we are to take the good side of life, and the more we'll advance the more good and evil will become a factor embedded to the economy, since it's a reward system which you can steer toward ideals or goals, and why shouldn't our ideals of good be seen as super valuable?

The solution for everybody to live comfortably while being more adequately rewarded for the energy they spend makes it limit how much money people can run away with (in the current view, in my view it should be a credit system, so the concept of stashing money out of fear or for more doesn't exist). Next, the whole priority tree is inadequate, and we need to enlarge what can be given a value, all the while increasing work accessibility so more people can do some jobs, specialty will have to be better divided and concentrated while computerized automatic work distribution engines will have to be developed, that way you won't have the extremes of this reality where as soon as you get a job you are squeezed out of your energy (time, or free potential) while there are people who could do the same job doing nothing, but this situation serves well this system of pyramidal competition...

Money is not a cold materialistic thing produced by machines, we forgot that money is human life energy, where we invest it ideally, and nothing else; a machine cannot be taxed. Next, people are supposed to get a better standard of living for spending history building their society, so it is normal that they request more as time advances, which, you guessed it, won't happen for a multitude of reasons here. Finally you got to pay your debt man...

Why is the middle class getting poorer? Because we print more and more money while creating less and less jobs, or less worthy ones, which is like an indirect tax, it's just that 50 000 is not worth 50 000 anymore, and what is the true reason it is happening? Because we are in a temporary system, a competition of vampires feeding on the life energy of people working, and devaluating money is an after effect of keeping the blood circulating in their direction, whatever the logic of it I already explained in Systematic Magic. The whole system is a competition meant to permit the most ego driven people to enrich from growth and jobs and lodging and love and everything.

When you look at it, money, or human life energy (time, free potential), could be used for anything, the choice we were manipulated to accept is to use the most of it for incredibly counterproductive toward life advancement goals and people, that I don't need to enumerate. But the money could be used for totally different priorities, to increase the standard of living of most, skip indebting future people, develop fusion energy and electric roadways far faster, to increase space development 10 times, anything, and that can be seen as new jobs. Why is it so important for someone to stash money? Or to make more than 250 000$ a year? Why? What? You think creativity should be dependent from rich people? No need to, instead of giving a mountain to one person, thus limiting creativity greatly, you make the mountain available to everybody and people decide to unlock the means for the creativity projects they prefer. So there are no arguments, and I talk simply to skip writing 5 pages. So you want to continue that path? You want a sermon on good, evil and fairness? This mentality that people can compete to be worth an infinity of money like they're in a competition to become "gods" should never have existed, there is a limit to human worth whatever you do. Is it too late to repair this? Do you think it will happen by voting for this guy or that to run the Democracy-Capitalism business? Do you think a handful of peaceful protesters will succeed while they militarize the police?

First, we'll eliminate tax on products or services, that's something which won't exist for us, in theory. The difference is in the strategy to give value to things or people, a competition as an all englobing principle to set values will be oblivious to many good principles, while a philosophy of good principles to set such values will have to work very differently. So yes if the goal is to have the lowest price possible in everything, then competition all over the place is the perfect tool, but that's not how it will work in a life reality, it will be different principles that will set prices, and this most fundamental difference changes everything.

Tax rate will simply not exist because reality will have all the money from the start. The basic principle is that people are worth an amount when they're born, the same for everybody, and every day this amount is increased to reflect a new day of life. Everybody that's part of the reality is worth it, and the form it will take is the basis of needs, not credits. So all the credits will go in the reality bottle, and then used in whatever way necessary, with the basis as a priority. Meaning that the goal of the reality is to provide the basis and arrange priorities, and this basis includes a division of the means for cultural societies development, which may experiment their own economy, as long as they stay adaptable, and work toward reality's priorities. But the basis is not a pile of stuff we drop free, and I wouldn't want to let basis lodging fully in the hands of any culture, because my experience is a triple fail under all the forms profiteers used to distribute it, that ends here, it's a reality thing now, that money and help is reserved, you take it for your design of the basis, if there are leftovers they stay in the bottle, if you can provide it cheaply and people are happy then all the better, if you require adjustments allright, if you make it more expensive you pay unless compensating results are shown somewhere else, in which case reality may encourage you. You are forced to provide the basis, if you don't develop a project we'll force one on you.

So in theory there is no need for a tax, or the tax is 100% if you prefer, that's our solution to the Jews problem, 100% tax (joking, but they do think their vision of god is the one and only too, I wonder what money is to them, and they stash it for what...).

To me and my buddies it's the life energy of people, their time, transformed to numbers, and that's the only thing we have to tax since that's what permits the existence of objects or services. The object or service is there because someone spent energy or time on it, you tax that energy or time since it is from it that the whole civilization exists. You cannot point at a star and say it's yours, apply your name, then tax people looking at it, right? And you cannot make a robot and tax the robot, it doesn't give a shit about your tax, you can only tax human life energy, or high consciousness energy, the energy of people who, in ideal theory of a best way of things, should comprehend what they're doing (loose factor that greatly enhance the value of actions, it's like the more you understand stuff truly, the more you're supposed to be valuable in your actions, minimizing incompetence and evil infiltration. That's what education is supposed to be used for btw, understanding...But me I understand "stuff", if I wanted to say things humbly, without much of your education, the hard way maybe, but something is not working properly.

The way things will work we don't actually need a tax because user payer applies by default to products and services, beyond the basis. The price of the object or service is supposed to go back to reality or cultural society, so no tax, but revenues may have to be adjusted individually to reflect at years end, probably not.

You won't need to tax gas to make a stash to invest in something related, you do the related project and you reimburse it by paying more for gas, variable in function of cost of the project and its running costs, you can do that in advance too if you want, and no that's not a tax, that's logic. Then once the project is reimbursed, you lower the price of gas, except for the new running costs.

The next basic principle from which a civilization can attain global goals is simply to work more than what you get, to bring more than what you cost globally, to spend more than the value of your energy spent toward your own person. In other words, you must be worth more than your own life energy worth calculated by the civilization, it means that your work permits not only your existence, but it permits the existence of someone else, your newborn at a more basic level, even if he is doing nothing. The basic principle is not an exchange or a work together, even if such notions are excellent to have; the basic principle is that you permit the existence of another human being by your sole existence, so you'll never get more than half what is the basic value of a person in our reality beyond the basis.

So the way to see it is as a pool of money that everybody is connected to, and a big part of it is to provide the basis of fairness for everybody. The money can be use for anything or take any form like production (don't forget that structures or things replace life, even if things are not living, but you need builders, caretakers, producers, etc...). And don't twist the principle by limiting it to a facet satisfying a profiting view; a rich may seems to permit the existence of the people serving him, but in truth the person serving him is a big cost because it is an extension. Then you got to take fairness in consideration and presently the true extent of its effect is reflected in others who are poor, or at the extreme, in other countries that are starving, as a condemnation on people not responsible, and finally, as limitation to having more people living well; a yacht for a rich person is worth many people living (in quantity of pollution and exploitation of resources), the same for their castles and everything, like living counter productivity; having the people needed to take care and build such stuff and satisfy all their needs is very counterproductive toward good goals. The trick is equilibrium and fairness.

It may not be fun to hear for some people but it's not a batch of whitened bullshit, it is a truth, it is a fact, and you must learn it fast in life and not forget. It's like the fundamental law of ego where you can grow it as long as its cumulated negative effect on others doesn't overwhelm the positive effect to you. If you were alone on a dead planet, then you could grow it infinitively, you'd be a god.

In old times it was "easy" or not complicated, the father somewhat "just" had to hunt to feed the family, and the mother somewhat "just" had to sew things together to make clothes to protect the family. From that simplified example, all kind of complexity and specialty spring from for efficiency as more people are added. At tribe level, everybody did what they could to have some value and some exceptional members of the tribe were given greater value from past actions, mainly warrior actions or healing knowledge.

When money appeared, everything got mixed-up because we transferred the worth of some actions as numbers, good actions, or actions helping civilization. Quickly almost everything came to be permitted to have a maximum of money since it is supposed to be a reflection of our "good" worth, which is absolutely not the case, the good or evil value of money is entirely dependent on our attitude with it, and in today's ridiculous competitive environment, we are better saying that our worth is a reflection of our ability to get money in any way; steal a few millions and you'll have the cutest girls at your feet, as simple as that. I should add that money has an incredibly relative value in this reality too, and that value is entirely dependent on what the best manipulators and profiteers want to make of humanity, we are at the result of that, and the result is a hell of PMBBD and unfairness. So, you can twist everything, even systemize your twisted manipulations, to have more money because you believe it is your worth which is absolutely not the case; even in a "perfect" reality you have no idea of your true worth, particularly if you like to valuate or devaluate good and evil actions, particularly if your vision of it is toward life's advancement, that's why it's better to do it versus civilization goals.

But the fundamentals (work more than your worth) are still there and carried by the lower pyramids, no choice, no civilization without this, but do they have their true worth? Or is it tremendously devaluated in most cases and fantastically inflated in few? And who decide the value of work? Civilization goals and priorities are supposed to determine this in big part, and a civilization is not an individual or a gang. Next, what we forgot is that money is numbered life worth of precise actions in time, and that's incredibly relative.

Yet, without an economic system there are only communities and tribes, you don't reach other stars with that, and an economic system is not sufficient to systematize things enough to permit a civilization to forever last, goals are tremendously important, and principles too, and more.

Now, you don't have to see the work more than what you get principle as a condemnation to work like crazy; the situation can evolve to the point where almost no effort is needed because of automation, but still the principle applies, it's just that instead of working 8 hours a day to have the necessary effect you work 6 or 4 and you gain a lot more from the energy you spend. And that's why a basis is important too; at some point you can grow the basis instead of working less if you want, or lower basis work hours to nothing, making the basis an absolutely free thing, there are all kind of options, and they will exist as long as the principle is kept toward civilization goals and priorities; people who are not productive toward these will not gain added value beyond the basis.

You don't have to create an unbelievably complex and invincible structure to select those who will profit most from controlling things, in fact, an economy, like many things in a "good" reality, is a very simple thing and we should imperatively work toward a continual simplification of it. As a reality grows in complexity, the basis on which a reality stand must be available for understanding to a maximum of people. The more complex the basis, or dwelling in PMBBD, the later the reaching of true adulthood, among the few "relative" factor to take into consideration when supposing the age at which most people reach adulthood.

Making things secure and fair will be enough complexity, no need to involve evil, so we'll simplify shit tremendously by removing controlling egos out of control and the competition for profits at all cost philosophy from the loop. If you like little scriptures in an obscure language you need a master degree in law, or a lawyer to understand and a tremendously costly court and "judge" system to keep things unfair, then stay in this reality, it's perfectly complex for you, (worthless jobs are an inefficiency, wasted life, pollution, exploitation, but that's relative; is it worthless to kiss a few trees? (watch-out for ego god ideology people, they tend to agglutinate happily around the biggest tree until it dies!!!) Like art that is not a worthless job if it got a positive effect, and it can have all kind of positive effects for society, specific people, and the artist. So sorry if I see worthless or worse jobs everywhere in this reality, but it is truly the case, its efficiency at reaching noble goals or ideals is not much, maybe 15%?).

I believe a lot of our attitudes will become better, and our imagination, and our creativity will reach farther with a more comfortable basis and a reality that is a "no brainer". Not only from earlier reaching of true adulthood, but more potential from comfortable people than from poor people too, no more wars so less people killed, etc. Good complexity is when it is useful for attaining good goals like mathematics, or for good diversity like dresses, art, entertainment, bad complexity is worthless complexity on fundamental things. The other aspect is all my vision of life that is under an optimization process of complexity, which I kind of associate to my vision of reality, as centralization, which comes with association and efficiency, like a mind with its cells working in harmony. So complexity is just a factor that should always be minimized, unless you make art (life is art, your language is art, but not fairness or science, but you can put the spirit of art around it, but maybe not as a ballet dancer on a rainbow, I'm so tired of seeing rainbows lately, my whole city doesn't make sense in its colors anymore with this light they paint all building with, that's overkill and ugly, not artistic at all to me... It's related to the efficiency of goals too, it's harder to score a goal when you got to drag a circus of artists with you, and all the potpourri of pub that comes with it, added to all the potpourri of sponsorship logos you're already carrying...You attain a goal in minimal complexity and that's it, for the simplest explanation, maybe after you can embellish the thing, and aren't you supposed not to sell the skin of the bear before killing it? And all that still doesn't include concepts like choosing a best path which may involve far more complexity than choosing the fastest path, or the easiest. An advanced engine got as many goals as there are pieces, so you got to involve a long process of optimizing for efficiency toward what is the goals of the engine you're making, which can be form, weight, torque, rpm, noise, money, pollution, all that in different ratios.

We will apply such a view for our languages, cultural languages can take any form, be as complex as you want, but the reality's language (English in theory) will be our fundamental language, and so we will emphasize it to carry as much truth as possible, to minimize conflicting definitions, and remove unnecessary complexities. We can take our time with that, but if we do things well, it may even be possible we will get facets of it reflected genetically, easing our life, or providing better or truer emotions, or dreams (after thousands of years of stability that is). Is it possible to develop a language as truth? Yes absolutely. The same for true love, a fundamental thing to us, make it too complicated, twist it at all sauces, and you'll minimize the best it can provide.

And a society is not a work of art; civilization is no more a work of art than an experimentation ground for scientists, experts, psy and religions, and it is surely not a joke either, or worst of all; a game of monopoly. But art and creativity can spring from a reality and that's some of the places where we should find it (unnecessary complexity), and in many instance it can be very enjoyable (music etc.). But our mind always tries to simplify (and see through its most lazy, or ego, point of view...). Making simple important things complex is another way for some to take control and exploit some facets of our life, we don't help ourselves by making things complex without need, you're not supposed to pass your life clearing PMBBD, and you're not supposed to grow your mind in conflicting complexities. There is the shortest path, there is the fastest path, there is the easiest path, then there is the best path; there is only one better path for life, and it is not the unconscious evident and easy default path...

For now, things are simple principles but don't worry, they will get complex, even if they have no reason to become impossible to understand globally and totally with sense. Before continuing, I'll say that I never developed my mind in an optic of profiting or making money, so, whatever I think I know what it is more than most, and the importance it has, I'm kind of incompetent playing in the twisted and complex system this reality built over thousands of years with millions of people putting their energy to make it invincible and that caused you to lose your home; I set a basic vision for another reality, I hope you understand that. Besides, do you think it started like it is today? Not at all, it started very basic and that's what I do; give the basic principles that we must strive to keep. But I should mention that permissions can be granted to some cultures (more later) to try economic variations that don't conflict fundamental ideals, but no pyramids of profits, no debt condemnation and no money that grows in trees.

To recapitulate a little, when someone succeed at taking a million for himself, whatever the way, where does it comes from? From high consciousness life energy time, there is no money if people don't spend energy or time doing something valuable, and this money, even if those giving it think it is their money and they can give it to whomever they want, is all interrelated, it does not only concern those exchanging it, it concerns the whole planet if all economic systems are interrelated. As for the way to express it, it is dependent on security and intelligence; metal, paper, computers, whatever, it's still just a number taking one form or another. So, if you understand what money is, then you understand that the quantity of money is proportional to the number of humans using it, and since human life energy value is a variable, you are forced to use the number of people for a constant. It means every new human adds a basic number in a pool of money, whatever you want, let's say 1000, and then you divide the pool among everybody depending on who is most valuable, in totality of effect preferably and it must stay that way. Next, the motivational effect, or movement effect, or heart beating effect, is either gained from resetting everything every day or by adding a value every day, I prefer adding a value, again 1000, because the energy is transformed as a reality morphing tool, the most evident facet of which is objects and services. Finally, people die, and not taking that into consideration is a guaranteed fuck-up. It mean a person is worth 1000 when born, added 1000 everyday, attain some kind of billion number in value, and when he dies poof! The whole number is erased, the economy readjusted in general aspect and reality is left with the benefit of the effect the person had in reality; see it as a hurt on the reality, this is the heart in pain from missing this person, the reality is a little weaker for it, but it's nothing besides all it gained, and you don't have to subtract right there for maximum palpitation trauma, you can have a kind of negative buffer of the dead instead, to signify bleeding. For those of whom this person was important, it will have to show in the mood of the interface, absolutely, we are there, moody immersive moving interfacing with the machine. It's still all personal preference, you can have everything very basic too, particularly for some forms of limited devices.

That's enough complexity, in theory, precision and effectiveness should increase with time, and the only exception I would accept on this is love. Everything must be dependent from these simple fact. You can say this thing or that service is worth this or that quantity of money, but the value of everything must change proportionally to the quantity of people whatever the value you give to skills or things. Today it is impossible to go back to the good way of money, the only way is to start all over, proudly carrying all the knowledge and understanding related to it, forming our intents, because our energy is our soul.

Again there is a kind of fatality to this aspect of living too, like we've been had from the beginning because it's just logics in the perfection of everything, all civilizations in the universe enjoyed the style at their beginnings, whatever the intents. Still, the fundamental truth remains, it is human life energy, so a person can use 20 millions of "his" money to spread it on his selection of people, or get them to work for him, he'll still have to take the money from human life energy somewhere, and this somewhere is other people who took it from others somewhere and so on, and if the effect is an increase in unfairness, it will count as a negative weight of evil on the shoulders of the recipient if he is not worth the amount toward good goals. That is whatever you asked politely for the money or not, unless the result is an increase in fairness or wellbeing (temporary placebos don't count), but that's still dependent from the value of the goal (priority).

So don't think your way is the only way to have an economy turning, it's just an economy of manipulators and opportunists (profiteers) as a competition of cheaters. It looks cool and good when you're a young civilization, millions of opportunities (cakes) abound, opportunists and fame dreamers jump in to become "gods", family dynasties appear everywhere, systematizations are made all over the place, pyramids of all form, but someday only those who took unfair means are left to profit from new opportunities, except from some entertainment facets, because opportunities become rare and very expensive and all the competition have been won. And so you created systemized unfairness as what defines humanity to the whole universe, the civilization is made of eternal structures defining the form of the people, condemning them, and versus the goals of life in the universe you have become a failed life extrapolation. Now, it's nothing new for most, it's always been the case, we never systemized fairness, but someday it will be the irreversible final truth of humanity and we'll disappear one way or the other because of it (and or other attitude related things we can change too).

And sorry if I often come back to these very important things, but they revolt me because they are simple and evident to understand, and to know people voted for such condemnations... Either people are innocent of what money is in its simplest form, or they don't want to think about it because of the mess this reality made of it. Maybe it's time people start practicing their independent judgment concerning civilization ways for more than voting for a boss... But it's not their fault, as it won't happen as long as those who took the means, or made the system (they're dead...) won't want to put the means to it. Only then will people and civilization gain greater value.

As for the variations that can be tried by different cultures, they must have as a goal to help reality's goals better while satisfying masses as good or better. If some variation is found to better fit our goals, we can make a monetary system switch, even if that will never be an easy thing. Insane? Well, I find it insane that such a capacity is not available in current reality. You remember what I said about seeing as far as we can in the future? We make a system that we can embark on a spaceship, a system that we can drop on a virgin planet, a system that will save thousands of years passing through an ego systematization (logical start from 0, but when you land on a new planet with a spaceship, you don't start from 0 or in old Rome, you start as advanced as you can, you continue the work of humanity, you don't restart it, and that applies to the initial point too, that's why the flower city I'll describe later got extreme environmental survival capacities). We'll have live double, and triple system redundancy, we'll be able to implement variations with a minimum of hassles, but the ideal basis must be preserved and we must always strive to correct our mistakes, not keep them eternally by playing around because it pleases a gang that profits from it as a cultural thing.

You know the ideals of our reality, you know its goals, then you can use parts of any monetary system if it reaches these goals, even an hybridization of capitalism. I don't have to repeat all what those goals are, but one thing's for sure; it is not to compete capitalism or compete for profits or compete for monopoly by competing diversity markets.

Profitability competition presently is forced to exist, but you can almost totally eliminate the notion and reap greater benefits. That applies to size or form or taste monopolies, we'll slap that off the hands of industrialists with their paid scientists, we'll emphasize diversity, like imposing a limit to productivity of a single thing, whatever the way it is done, one can specialize in 5 varieties, the other in 5 more, or switch, but I won't think about that, it's like everything; it comes with the ideology...there is not only one way, there is not only one variety, you'll get that mentality out your mind if you want another reality because it is a different variety, raisin wine limited people who think they are gods of taste and any other variation tastes bad and means air in the bottle, good for the dump, like me that is bad and got air in the bottle, such people will stay away from us, this homogenization of humanity this reality is seeking; races are meant to be protected as developing diversity, not all diluted to a single one in a mess in the name of the economy. The multiculturalism homogenization we're doing is in fact a reflection of a bad economic system, because in the end everything is based on our vision of money, and the biggest fucking proof of concept failure is to end-up with your economic system so incompetent at doing things right that you destroy or compete the second more important aspect of life to make it work; diversity.

So I'll add that while some kind of hybridizing with reality's way can be tolerated, I'd be extremely careful with that. But yes, get those experts and financials with good intents together, even if for now we'll say we don't need them; we work from "pure" idealistic principles, and to date it makes sense, and it will still do after I'm finished. For now, just pronouncing the word "tax" is like a bug in my mind. So I'll keep it at giving the basic "pure" principles, while I tax some butts free.

To have the means to grow a civilization worth the name, you have to first acquiesce that a monetary system is a civilization thing since you need it to grow civilization, to attain goals which a gang or tribe or community can't attain. The most important and simple principle is that money is high consciousness life energy time transformed to numbers. The value of a job is dependent on many factors but it is not decided by you, it is decided by society. The transformation of high consciousness lifetime as goods or services is where everything gets very complicated. Nothing appears on earth with a price tag, and the price tag is applied in function of people's needs, priorities and goals, individually and globally, and in function of energy spending to give the service, or get or transform the object, and that can be to learn expertise too.

A tax is a principle that is useful, but more related to what fundamental vision of money and civilization and life development you want, if I wanted to believe someone choose the worst option instead of the best... The simplest justification is to imagine 2 people being paid 100$ by society (community) to do something, one is growing food and the other building a bridge. Paying them 100$ is giving them a value toward civilization. It is just a number. Now, there is a job nobody likes to do, so either you force that person to do it with a whip, or give an advantage, or use PMBBD, or you pay that person more than 100$. Here we'll want to pay more than 100$ to do the job, but without breaking the equilibrium principle, meaning one will be paid less than 100$. As you can see, being paid more or less have nothing to do with good or evil at this point. The 100$ is just a number to play with to exchange the worth of a job toward the society we're forming.

Now, to attach many people more like a civilization with common goals, you impose a tax rate, so they work more than their worth and the surplus life energy can go to a leadership structure that will direct it to other projects or attaining of goals by adding the money as an acceleration tool, which can be used on anything, depending if the people concerned are in a state to succumb to the pressure, if not you can invest in making the most devious machiavelic plan that will develop through thousands of years to make everybody succumb with open legs.

A better way to see it is that both understand they will need something they can't do themselves; call it collecting mushrooms on a dangerous mountain. So the two leave a part of their bacon in a common spot to pay a third person better to collect the mush, and that person understands that someone needs to taste some rare violet mush so he put a part of his bacon in the common place for the eventuality someone is interested in doing that. And there you have your very basic tax principle.

Now, how can a tax become a negative thing? Through pyramids of competing monopolies, profiting from the fact that not everybody endorse the same goals, or like mushes; some don't want to pay for something they don't like to eat, so, instead of paying for the person, you pay for the object individually, and the problem is there; some don't want to pay for you getting at the mushes. So, you turn everything around, and instead of being a civilization thing, it becomes a competition thing, as you personally decide your worth by dividing your high consciousness life value time between each mush and you make it as high as possible for all kind of reasons; good and bad, and then someone sees your big profits and says "me too" "me bigger" and competition starts, price wars, I'll get starving employees that can do it for 5 cents, and we'll stuff them empty stomach with all the mush leftovers. And the civilization in all that? To hell with it! it doesn't decide anymore, it needs a dictator to force or manipulate things in incredible complexity, ego and competition give counter pressure, stashes, pig greasing, luck too, and people decide little things like what to eat, and the mush collector can decide that too with pub campaigns, limitations, and PMBBD.

Then the civilization that lost much of its efficiency toward ideals will get in the fray by taxing the objects, which is supposed to be a reflection of the true life energy expending value, but which it is absolutely not anymore. And things are far more complicated than that, all kind of funky factors embark in the competition while the civilization lose tremendous efficiency filling libraries with laws to control the ego competition.

Now, problems started when the collector applied life value to individual mushes trying to create his own market, he opened the door for profit competition and opportunists to jump in and put pressure to manipulate markets, not at their disadvantage for sure, and now the only way to compete this guy is with tremendous investments. The good way is that the person must be paid for her life energy expenditure by society (reality); if you collect mushes, they must be forwarded to society because you embark them on the economic system; you keep your eyes on the mushes as you keep your eyes on the rocks. Then it will arrange a fair way for its distribution to people; you can apply a price tag all you want to individual mush this way, and you'd be stupid applying a tax since the mushes are already yours, and nobody is "god" of the mushes.

What all that means is simple, you pay people fairly for a job or attitude, and you keep it personal, and you don't fuck it all up by transposing it to objects who understand nothing. Evidently, everything works together, you can't do that in present reality because the competition will make you unhappy, this can only work in a situation where profiting competition is not a pressure, where people don't have to stash to feel secure or successful. All what's good doesn't work well with an ego ideology, neither in a reality where people are in admiration of those who successfully gained unfair means, particularly by cheating, whatever it is just a probability.

So for us there won't be people or gangs controlling things and applying prices in function of this belief or that with investments driven by profiting as a competition. The best you'll do with wrongly built minds meddling around good stuff is a mess with an order, or ways to gain more time, so whatever you think you're having the bull by the horns, you're running from it like a losers is more like it, while trying to boast your bravado, gaining time, on the defensive, fear, react to events, profit from them, because you're too stupid to understand. Woops, that ended badly, no choice with toreador stuff, but sometimes it's like my mind absolutely want bad stuff written; yay, an opportunity to say people are stupid, got to write it super fast! (financials, common, it's me that's stupid associating these great and good minds with bulls and toreadors...). Things wouldn't have gone to that point if the selection process hadn't put its emphasis to defend wrongs or make them acceptable, because people are supposed to do something, but they don't in fact, they are perfectly ranked behind the system, which is very very scary to me, to me it's like the Everest of hell, the peak pierced the sky, it is shouting its success, what comes after that is judgment day and it being irreversible, then the earth will shake, you'll bloody its white coat, and go back to your knees, better luck next time... For now accept your new condemnations, peacefully or violently, as 9 billion of people if that's how you like it...

All that weird was to say concerned people must have a worthy say in everything dynamically, and they must be associated to adequate expertise, for judgment to be adequate and not deteriorate or limit the selection process badly, that's another reason behind A&D groups, you must have both those things, they are absolutely necessary for a more advanced, lasting and fairer reality systematization, as I was explaining the importance of not neglecting anything if you don't want to end-up 9 billions people without an idea, because I feel quite alone here, at least I'll understand what that really means, not only in reality, but in my mind too; do people have this stuff in their mind too? It doesn't sips out? Because I'm a letter lost in a sea of text here, while even a paragraph is enough to make me feel insignificant, and I have no link to anything, except my survival obligations; I don't relate to this, only as a far away ancestry thing, but whatever I do I'll always be a part of it, so I'm the guy taking the bulls by the horns for real here, but not for real, as it should be ironically in hell...I'm just, fwhoops, passing my very long and complex message that's supposed to be easy to understand, so what the hell happened?

Presently, unfairness is mostly situated after the transformation level, in fact, there are 2 weigh for the same measure; workers are paid a salary, as low as possible, while the item they make or collect is traded at the highest price possible versus competition, and the profits all end-up in the pockets of the boss, or his gang, or investors who are playing a betting game, and the government evidently, that will have to take the bad role of taxing to gain the means to do its things. It is mainly emotive competition that set limits to price, while on another aspect you got consumers to do their logical part toward production, the more there is the less it should be costly, again depending on the competition and if people have knowledge of all the intrinsic, which is rarely the case, like me that is barred from the market, whatever the twisted argument. It's not a question of my work being interesting to people so they buy more of it, it's a question that I can't even enter the market, thanks to god old censorship, version 2000 religious style hypocrisy, made worse by the intrinsic of the system and the selected mentalities that fit it who see my work as not good enough to enter their supposedly free market that that can't cope with a free mind doing his work for free? A market working so well it's all a matter of elite publicity, trying to manipulate people and shoot them publicity within the law to get them to buy your product, for friends, family, and the whole fucking universe...

All that while governments are in a continual fight to extirpate money everywhere they can as taxes without looking bad. That's somewhat how it work for small pyramids, for the bigger ones, twisted limitations to salary must be set to stop people from running away selling everything for billions, so a stash is necessary, often from involving investors who like money to grow in trees, and the company become a separated good on the commodity market, investors and speculators buzz around like flies, and you need a master's degree in twisted economics to "understand" something that justifies the fantastically flabbergasting ultimately ridiculous salary at the top, while people at the bottom are still paid a simple salary that could be understood and justified by my grandma in the au dela (the beyond). It can't work like that in our reality and I won't grow a secondary brain thinking about it; we won't grow money in trees, so no interest rates and virtual selling of stuff, and we won't dump our failings on future generations; these are things we won't accept.

The big part of the complexity of today's economic structure is to permit some people to enrich legally and for the lower pyramid to deal with them, no need for it, the general idea is that you'll have a salary judged by people and if you want to open the whole ladder as a businessman, then the top you can go is still the equivalent of our top salary. If the work is uninteresting or too hard or complex, we'll increase the salary without cheating or we'll pay 2 people, and we'll arrange thing so no jobs is so difficult we become dependent of someone.

Now, even if you think it will be more complicated, that's exactly the contrary, we'll gain megatons of efficiency from putting an end to the impossibly complex system of limitations and taxes necessary to limit people's appetite and permit governments to do their thing, supposing I idealize governments, since half the economy is meant to encourage the ego competition and production and protection of those who successfully take unfairly, their gangs, or their stash, or their pyramid, or family dynasty. And don't worry, there will be many rich and many ladders to climb and many reasons to do it and people will still dream of doing it and it will be worth it. We'll just eliminate senseless exaggeration, we don't need this, and the price to pay for it is fantastic.

For work value, when I was in my cavern, with my Neanderthal woman, as the leaders of our clan, we designed the economy of life with rocks, but we lost that knowledge. Anyway, a simple way to see it would be to have 100 self-created people, some developed themselves for personal goals and other did it for society ideals, whatever, what counts is what we give them as a value since the goal of the monetary system is to grow a civilization for infinite survival while reaching good goals. So forget about giving yourself a value, or selecting a gang or making a selection to give yourself a value, value is given by everybody that deals with the money, and they keep their eyes on the mushes, as well as on the rocks (the bacon for pork people, there are bull people too, and horses, and cows, and big white turkeys...). The value of those 100 people toward reality at that precise moment can easily be imagined to be from 1 to 100 (or 50-100, it's just a simplification), but before some will complaint that their value is underestimated, I'll say that they have to understand that a reality can't be a just thing alone first, if you want to be just, you'll have to pay people proportionally more from their calculated indispensability value toward life as a whole, not solely the reality, and you better get more than financials if you want to deduct something that make sense, but a reality that is near that notion will inexorably come to the point of giving great value to indispensability toward life (or good), maybe even going to the extent of successfully implanting the notion strongly enough to give it some of the highest emphasis of pay; the best person in many facets, the best pay, not only using the job as a the value of someone. You can see this natural tendency even in this reality; there are a lot of situations where we give good and evil bonuses and punitions, good which can be seen as being an example of an ideal, evil is another matter.

Second, the best reality is fairly unfair to everybody as everybody have a different opinion of what is fair or valuable. So the only way to be fair enough is to give everyone of the 100 people a pile of 100 rocks, and then, individually, without influence from others or seeing the pile of rocks, divide them all back to each, except yourself, of our 100 people in order of personal judgment value, whatever it is toward attaining reality's ideals or its contrary, and those are many, and they have a different value for everybody, and some people will just have other priorities, and those people are still a part of the reality and for simplification we'll want to give everybody the same worth of judgment, just distinguished as age groups, with the exception of direct expertise related A&D, but we are not there yet...

Again the trick is to find a way to stop people to gang together to manipulate the true worth of some for future self-interests; I explained how that can be done with A&D judgments groups. Then everybody counts its rocks to know who will get the biggest pay from 1 to 100. The numbers of rocks don't decide the size of the pay, only the position on a ladder of 100 numbers. That is just a view; you could get the same result from a hidden vote system, and things can be more complex than that. And we must keep in mind to always put limits where ego can infiltrate through manipulation, like one in a pretty robe starting to sing a beautiful entrancing song (political or religious babbling can do) until everybody give him its highest value in hypnosis. Now, why would we need more than that? Do we want people to decide the worth of people's actions? yes? Then that's the idea, you can somewhat play around it, but the fundamental notion is there; in our reality, it's the people that will decide what's worth what, while the reality will expose its priorities (goals) and if you want better or more complicated, then do it as a worth of life time.

To recapitulate a little, if you stick to high consciousness life energy time, you can say everybody's time is worth the same 100$ a day in pure principle, but it is not the case, there are things people like to do more than other, and there are civilization goals or emphasizes (priorities). So at this point the 100$ becomes relative, but we must keep it as 100$ because it expresses the first principle. The next principle in line is that if you want to pay someone 110$ because you valuate his work more or he's doing a risky or hard job, there is someone that will be paid 90$. That's for 2 people. The next principle in line concern many people; if we have 10 people, they can be paid 99$ to have the 10$ surplus. Next is objects which is a temporary form the high consciousness life energy take, they are one of many result of its expenditure, but at this point we're as well see it somewhat the same way, but as independent as possible, like the society end-up with most production and services, the same principle as a business, but with completely different goals or emphasizes, that's why I say most business presently are very adaptable to our ways, in fact that applies to many aspects of this reality, we could manage, with some hurt, most of what has been developed by this reality, the exception are vast cities, they will be a problem, and you will keep them.

Our market is where people will spend whatever amount that represent their ladder of pay, the same ideally, as a system of things and services that are valuated by people from a whole amount of energy value of all the credits in circulation, number that can be divided as goals and emphasizes. That's very open, but it has too many advantages, and no problem if you know what you're doing, like a slider between extremes where you run in the green when this particular item is at its ideal value (total production value of it in human work value (include the cleaning and processing of pollution if applicable) divided by its projected lifetime, and that is always a close approximate, in all its eventual thousands of categories, from local to reality. But this item is made of a whole of parts and we are better with the capacity to force things a bit, even if they break faster, that's just, people...they do that with everything, so who am I to argue? Argue with what? By saying we wouldn't exist if we didn't? We'll want to apply this philosophy globally too, meaning that if your thing in the green is too much of a problematic factor to greater goals, we'll put it in the red (fuck up its value, whatever it's value should logically increase, but we may do the contrary if necessary, in our fight against entropy, or evil...).

It's just a different explanation of a concept that already exist everywhere presently, and the market adjust in its own way, and people get an explanation in the news why the price changed, from logical argumentation, since the markets are already stressed to the extreme. It's look like it's logical that excellent markets disappear but it is not, it's just that whatever the argument it will always be used to defend the priorities of the ones setting the limitation, and it is sure a good idea to base your limitations on something else than money hungry competitive people with super hot priorities. What I'm talking about here is the availability of things, which includes luxuries and services, and the inventories, or logistics, because it remains an evidence to me that too many businesses doing the same kind of thing is not that much of a necessity; I personally live from a very limited business choice, even if I like diversity, and special nice places or ways to get magical items. So in the end it's just a matter of argumentation related to priorities, which may reflect a society's fears of it's own mentalities, since things just grow or degenerate from the priority tree of the society.

The idea for us is that if people are aware (different than ignorant) of all what is involved in obtaining something, then they should be less limited proportionally.

Finally, you need a principle to attach everybody in fairness as a civilization, and you need a buffer as you don't want to continually play with people's value. This is achieved with taxes presently, whatever the form, and it permits everybody to be paid 99$ for the 10 $ surplus, more than that you can make a stash for some big project. The tax is supposed to be a fairness enforcement as well as a buffer which permits the civilization to have a margin to play with. That's the ideal for an ego competition reality.

For us the tax is 100%, because things are decided by everybody, and you trust reality not to cheat or act unfairly, the numbers amounts to something that make sense, right in your face.

Profits to the person can be expressed as an incremental ladder or a multi thickness wheel set with 1000 indentations that increase or decrease pay for all kind of reasons that dynamically change, simpler at first, but with complexity potential. It can eventually take the form of a very complex looking structure in all its relations even if the fundamentals is simple enough, like a blood circulation system set by A&D groups associated to resizing of rings at different intersections in the main work form structure, because all work is interrelated, and efficiency or change of form require that you can grow a facet or make it smaller, or ablate it if it is in the way or conflicting, and you don't want to do that at the last minute in frustration, hate, revolt, destruction and death, where the strongest force evidently win. So you want to do things slowly by changing values at different points, for all kind of different things, and seeing things as visually simple as possible, and in all interrelation facets possible, since things forever change, so you don't fall flat dead out of breath imagining the complexity.

For starting, you can see it as a 3D set of veins and arteries connected to the heart (the bottle of "life points" (credits)), you place a ring, or set of rings at intersecting places, they mean variables, or goals, and between sets of rings are concerned people and they interact with all inter rings spaces of other veins everywhere, which can be seen as channels going to and fro, differently sized, forming the actual wanted size of "blood" channels, all the way to the heart, but mind cells control everything, so you may resize rings, or disconnect-connect at places that fit or simplify.

You understand that it is a visualization tool since no value is associated to length, even if you could, like transport or communication price, or service distribution or goods circulation, making different facets of form by changing the meaning, showing things all twisted to appropriate view, then you can optimize those spring channels, bubbles, corks and detours for a better effect. It won't be an easy task, and grave things will surely happens, like growing inefficiency of view and understanding of complexity.

That's why the whole reality have to be seen as experimental for some time, someday you may have to redo some things in a different way for a better view, simplicity or more efficiency, that's the why of the critical need for system disconnect-connect ability, someday you may have to unplug it for something more capable, and that can be from new technology or abilities or fundamental readjustment reasons. For now, maybe you're better forget my vein and arteries view and concentrate on having something that work in its interrelations, variables can be seen as sliders.

A simple view of the forming of an A&D group in that would be to find a subject, like security, then find concerned people, like a local area, then you choose appropriate leader people or expertise that is a bit older, ask them what and who they need as help, associate them as cost of that group, then start them working on the subject, everything concerning that subject in that area pass by them, if a new structure is built, the structure is associated to them, it grow the size of the "life-points" (credit) channel. Now that you have created the A&D group with its related channel of spendings, people all over the world can visually see in details the financial record and related costs of all the people and structures connected to that channel through history for whatever reason you can think of, only processing power and complexity is a limitation.

For more details about A&D relations with people, go back a few paragraph, but always relativize, and see it as a gross view, like if this book was all you had of someone that took a quick stroll in an alien civilization, see me as a human spy, I'm telling you how they see us, what kind of associations they would not like, how we could please them our way. But don't take that seriously, it's my imagination you're visiting, but you understand that I can't describe every details or create a final result in front of your eyes, I'm no "god" and this is your thing.

I have my judgment of what I can do, I die from my judgment one way or the other, my judgment may grab guns someday, but it is not your judgment, your judgment causes your own death, so don't listen to me like an open mouthed believer, die from your judgment, your priorities, whatever I am forced to compete to death by the laws of this reality to add elements to your judgment, and yes, if I could impersonalize Hollywood for it, I'd do it, but the only place I'd feel comfortable is in superman's skin, and it would be "superman unleashed in hell".

We must be patient with this way of doing things, as it is not based on people's drive for survival (fear stuff), there is no running fast to crash on the cake and systematize the mess for the like of yourself or a helpful gang, competing any other way to death, for a quick profit, on the back of innocence, or better, innocence not even born, a quick profit at whatever the scale of time, like 100 years of survival that is nothing versus the course of infinity. We must be careful for external out of control intelligent ego people since you won't have time to think, judge, and particularly systematize well such a way of things before they jump in and start using bits to scrap everything in twisted meanings, to take control of judgment.

Such a way starts more slowly, reaches efficiency later before exploding everybody in laughing suddenly realizing we're having fun, and at that point you'll be the most beautiful extraterrestrials around, and whatever the lonely nights, you'll never want to let ego forces invalidate the good of it for temporary extremes. As a kind of sale pitch.

So no competition here, we do different thing for different reasons, but I understand this view could never have existed without this reality, but it becomes a problem when better options are known and rejected for a handicap to evolution. So even if the principles may have been made at the right time, like the start of wide spreading of reading and writing; you'd just have time to get your philosophy written with the numbers ready with a thousand people to start the different way, but no, ego bloody killers on war footing debark on your project, kill everybody, put the fault on your shoulders, sit the boss on a throne to decide everything, and you better obey! The earth is flat btw! So you failed, got yourself and your friends massacred, everything burned, better luck next time...and that's if you're lucky, after learning to count on his fingers, he will learn to write himself a glorified story where you're the worst enemy, or, if you're so lucky, something small he didn't notice...but your next time will end up very far away, maybe never again if he got scared for his glorious position, mental construction, or palace accumulations...

So we start from a big bottle of life points, which is the continually changing total of every citizen. The condemned part of the bottle, or the red line is what's necessary to keep the basis going, it should be a slightly fluctuating drain. Now we have a better idea where we can go with our "free competition" type markets.

In the ideal scenario where someone existence is worth 1000 for every day of his life, around 20% is used for the basis, and half the rest for others, but that's just a principle, you can work 100% over the basis for others if you want. What's left is what you can take from the bottle of life points, day to day, as an available reserve if you want. Some will say they got that covered with the basis, but the basis is the work of everybody to permit everybody to be guaranteed adequate comfort, it's not a different group (like the over the basis group ) that is taking a more involved role in society from understanding their responsibilities, or who decide to compete in a market, or simply try to get top luxury without an afterthought for good and evil except the law, yes, we'll want any mentality that is adequate to fill our criteria to have a shot of enjoying reality their way.

1000 x 365 x age x number of population is the basic value you must use to have an idea of the size of the bottle of life-points (credit capacity). This bottle is the heart. A person means size. Trade (sold production) is an input. Pay, construction, structures, and basis mean drain.

Living from the basis is a drain in the bottle, that's why it will be better if everybody minimally work for the worth of the basis, which, as I already explained, can become work free as the civilization gets automated. Still, I would prefer people to always work a little, to keep them moving and functional as a workforce, and to make them not forget on what stands the basis, it is logical to me that a comfortable life is worth a minimum of work, the theory is that good people do things, like gardening, and seeing life as ending up doing nothing as a reward for doing something reflects a bad systematization and inadequate human development to say the least, whatever the displaced source. It doesn't mean people are not supposed to relax and like party and entertainment.

The empty bottle size is the addition of everybody's worth for a time slab, don't make it too big; appropriate. In a way, people permit the existence of the bottle, or the heart (the bottle is just for transparency, if you want to make a kind of pumping heart "skin", go ahead, or a motor and gears? Or a chemical reaction patent with pipes and pressures gauges? Or a string instrument? Or a Christmas tree with turning balls? Go ahead, but for now the bottle is simpler; you got to start at the fire).

If you added everybody's value, it should fit as the actual size of the bottle of life energy, since the bottle size is made of the addition of everybody's worth a day, which may be divided as hour. Where is inflation? I don't know yet.

The result of a job becomes a reality thing distributed by it, to some extent. So a seller is paid by society to sell stuff or provide a service and the result go in the bottle in the simplest vision; there can be variations to this scenario, as long as the fundamentals are kept. Meaning, the seller may have options, some will simply be paid by society, others may decide a scheme where they have the option to make their own markets and buying and selling at a different prices, then having a percentage of the profits kept for themselves.

The basis is a pure drain and so people living from it will have the smallest pay, they are still worth their 1000C a day like everybody, but because they prefer to relax more, then their job is to leave more of their credits to society, or others people working harder toward civilization goals, or making the basis more comfortable.

You could say that the basis is everything so those who live from it shouldn't have credits but that won't be the case since they'll still generally work a little. But no distinction at that level, the basis is everybody, so we all get the same pay, bad lucks are the exceptions. The other thing is that we want people to use and learn how things work, which include the credit system, and finally, it's a question of having a minimal level of credit related freedoms along your comfortable basis, no? Choosing, deciding, independence...

100 sounds like it could work (what, wait, 100 cents?), 100 credits a day everybody is the bottom line. A citizen existing got the basis plus 100 credits a day, this number increases to some extent as you add to your value which can be anything, not necessarily an actual job. The reward system is in part based on the type of effort a person is doing, the intensity of the desire to succeed (the work, good will) at attaining his ideal way of living.

Everything will be cumulative after removing cost, meaning it is a live budget, and the leftover of the budget cumulates in the bottle as a buffer; empty the bottle, ruin the civilization, and die. The more or the faster the bottle fill, the more things you can do, the more you're alive.

You understand that such a live budget will need some computing power, but it is not an absolute priority either, if the data is kept it can be postponed, as long as there is enough cumulated credits in the bottle. It is a budget, but you are better updating your budget as many times as possible, because there is not only a few transactions, but billions, and big ones like whole industries, so it is better to update as much as possible if you don't want to end-up with big surprises you won't like.

The reality won't start with millions of people, it will start small and that's how we will succeed at doing things, and that applies to computing power and abilities; you program thing small while thinking of what you'll need in the future and grow it to attain bigger goal, don't limit your horizons, but don't try to produce a final result that should require you to go through reproduction (get the means guaranteed (like tons of people), then attain the result); you know there will be billions of people using the system someday, so you do the best you can, always.

Now what do you want? It's basic but you have a and my whole work to explain the unexplainable, like the recipe of how to grow minds like mine that invent stuff like that, if you like to take risks and disfavorable bets, as I'm pretty sure your brains grown in buckets with the help of your psychologists won't cut it...

I say that's the way things should generally work, implying that your goal is not to end-up alone on earth (as god with servants who understand nothing)... And don't say it's just a scrap bit part of something else arranged to remove unfairness, like rich leaders profiteers of spirituality that will tell me there is no spirituality in my book to protect their market and gang, like economist will tell the world that there is no economy here because their profiting gang is not in it, like politicians will tell the world there is no leadership and all because their gang is not in it. What do you want? This is the life reality.

You need a financial system and what I'm making is a true one because there are economies in the bottle and they are not a bullshit manipulation trick. As for the need for a financial system, is there someone to say a reward system is not important to humanity? Yes there are, there are people who even think they'll make a better world without a financial system, they see finances as evil, and they'd do worse than anything in existence. Profiteers would invent themselves a financial system right away in a libertine view fool, the first on the cake, and they'd totally scrap any illuminated view right at the start; there is no fairness at a civilization scale without a financial system.

So who are those people who invented a financial system better than capitalism satisfying all the necessary fundamental principles of human life? Socialism? I'm sure that if you compare socialism to what I'm writing about, you'll end-up saying it can only compare to a facet of what I'm expressing, so don't compare my vision to socialism, it is not, my view is an independent and entirely new way of dealing with human life energy.

The same for Democracy under the current form, I invented a system that made sense for people to judge and decide, and you can't have that with a simple voting system on anything "someone" decide you should vote on, and you can't vote on anything and everything, you need a system of steps and access to top expertise. Is there a voting system that makes sufficient sense? Or am I the first to invent one? Direct Democracy? Don't be ridiculous!

That make me say that I may have been too hard against the current system, but at least I understand that I need it, and I'm not using PMBBD on people, trying to be the cause of an uprising while not telling them in what troubles they'll be in while showing them a funky irrationally incomplete end result like everything is about making libertine communities helping each others, or making a sect city for a few people or systematically make a computerized earth from some scientific algorithms pushed as AI's where people are dictated like robots from who? Scientist and psy calculations! Aarrg! And the whole thing will pop up as reality as soon as the economic system is demolished? You think you'll build cities and get billions of people to work well together without a financial system? And that applies to all the anarchist stuff, anarchy as a force is something I respect, but drop the idea of anarchy as a system when a system is meant to control stuff, it is evident without a serious thought to me that you'd only create an anarchy of dictators which would, after many steps of dictating ways, end-up as Democracy-Capitalism or something like that, and stop twisting the meaning to tag as many people as possible as anarchists, what is the true definition of anarchy? Ask 100 random people to have a "democratic" definition of it, and stick to it, to me it means people living without controlling (or limiting) structures and I'm against that, and I won't like manipulators twisting the true definition of it too, whatever they say it is for evolution, evolution have become the most ridiculous argument used to twist everything, if that can be satisfying.

What I'm describing is not illuminated or profiteer stuff, it is a financial system based on high consciousness life energy value, not on materialism or illumination, like people are things, or robots with the same needs all over, or lovely things in love of love (like me? No sign yet...).

I will add that there is nothing wrong with capitalism if you untwist it, if you bring it to me stripped of evil, simplified tremendously, packaged anew, upper limited, multi stashing removed, made plug and play capable, adapted to visual interfaces for people, open wide to them, controllable by them, all and all, remove self-inflated from manipulating it, unfairness and country competition while basing it on principles that make sense. With that, and bankers and rich and spiritual leaders doing the same, I'll follow you anywhere, but you won't go far with that in your final interdependent reality, that's why you'll need that hybrid started as a new reality, if that's really what you want, but I prefer my view. In fact, the fundamental principles I describe have strictly nothing to do with the current state of things where it is mostly banks that manipulate the worth of money this way or that with this system or that in ego competition, where the best manipulators and profiteers end-up with the most of it; there is no good monetary principle there, only a way to exploit and control people. So in fact, I may be the first in the history of humanity to have a view of money that makes good sense for civilized people, and that's just a facet.

But for now, I'm as well continue describing 0 sitting in mushes with bottles of life points, and my mind seem jammed at a simple thing I cannot see, worse than having a word stuck at the tip of your tongue, but I may be lost in simplicity so I'm as well suppose someone with a more profound mind on the subject will better see, or say that I'm somewhat in it; that's what happens when you replace capitalism with a few lines; you feel insignificant and missing the point, but the point I'm missing is probably self-inflation, so I won't worry about it too much, it will babble itself a pressure, and looking at its result, I could force most for a very long session working at the whip while eating lard and sweating it cleaning this mess.

The more people, the bigger the bottle, and when the bottle gets too big, you grow it (its quantity potential, you can visually do this by having a set of bottles, you begin with a tube simple bottle, and end-up with a fat round one, as people play with it and make it work their way, but it is still just a vision tool, you don't do things for the bottle or to fit it, it is the contrary, it is the mathematics and programming that count, a mistake in there and you may wake up in very deep troubles, or lose efficiency, always efficiency, that's incredibly valuable, like competence. I hope I'm not inefficient and incompetent toward good; that would really make me insignificant and depressive.

You'll have everything in live numbers too, actual projects underway and different sustaining costs (all spending) are subtracted from the bottle. Now, is there someone to tell me where the life-point stuff comes from? It seems I decided to call it that, but it's an association to my view and that's all. You can pump petroleum if you want, but at the reality level, we call that "credits" because that's what it is, a credited number associated to someone, and you just need to know that number in security, nothing else, a few electrons can do the job, no need for 20 tons of metal or plastic or wood spread all over the world. We'll take that 20 tons of metal and plastic to make a few serious wires instead, we'll carry tons of electrons faster than anything, and those are far more versatile...

With that, even if it doesn't seem workable or complete, of bizarre in my vision of things, you should get the basic idea from which a "good" "monetary" system can exist, what is missing is the market connection and this can be almost anything as long as it doesn't disturb the high consciousness energy value. I'm jumping over all the steps that grows a civilization to invent the civilization right away, you don't have a tribe here, abacus, traders on ships, nothing like that, you don't even have actual money anymore, I'm over even what exist today, you got a personal file, computers, a visual bottle of life-points, a judgment interface, a basis level of comfort, dynamic running numbers, etc. So this is all incomplete and imperfect, it's just my vision of what money is and how it should work.

All what I write about need pointed expertise, and that's the why of the computer simulation; we can skip 1000 years of struggle within a few years of pointed expertise effort to simulate things, and that's the worth of the effort. And many of the actual reality's facets, even if I don't like it, are necessary in this, and my dislike is a justification for my project too; don't forget that. And I'm not finished giving these kind of messages, my expertise is a vision of things, imagination; everything begins like that.

So, if I asked this whole planet to develop my vision, would someone have the creativity to work from it? Or good imagination? Can you create see where the market is here? Where are the goods and services in the story? The "green" value of goods and services is deducted from taking into account all the high consciousness expenditure of energy to bring it to people. This sets the green slab of credits that can be used from the life bottle for that specific class or market, so the life bottle get its marks set (don't be limited by the bottle vision, there can be thousands categories, all interrelated, each with an amount of credit that can be divided among its parts (goods, services) each with their green line as a reminder of their optimal value when all is taken into consideration. This will permit adequate knowledge to set the green line of it in the life bottle, which should get smaller as people make things cheaper to reflect things as an investment; something that becomes cheaper and more abundant is supposed to require less credits from the life bottle, thus more for other things, you understand that the goal here is not competition or profiting, so the system on that could adjust things automatically, and people force things through A&D, importance proportional, which may go all the way to put stuff in the red everywhere if things are optimal like that (no evil, a lot of ideals we'll never achieve, we don't have infinite resources and we don't live eternally, and we have to do with the state things are too, if we were on ice planet our ideal would be affected. So now you have independent categories, and whatever you do, the bottle of life point keep integrity, so the category, if it's doing things at a loss should take it upon itself to tough a few ticks by adjusting its prices until the bottle of life point decide to allocate more, or still less, means.

So objects and services are produced to end up reimbursing their total cost in human energy value is the ideal, but A&D will decide prices, while showing the production cost of the thing or service. The way I see it is that the bottle of life point is neutral and must remain so, it permits everything so everything is indebted to it, it represent the force of humanity and its efficiency. Categories are channels, vein and arteries, which manage what develop or die, how. They are mainly markets and services, which you can create. Then it's a matter of the keeping alive or the bringing back to life of those object or services; cut final and not related to life energy expenditures anymore preferably (just grabbing the stuff and selling or distributing it), so as to minimize your footprint on the life bottle. If you understand well what I'm saying, then you know that a free market take all its meaning here. You do what you want within some limits, while knowing that services will probably always keep a connection, permanently attached to it like a basis building with its maintaining costs.

From the life bottle, you grow the building and associate future work energy to keep it functioning, once that's done, you sell the building, reimbursing its invested life value in the life bottle, then the building is moved in its cathegory where its value can fluctuate based on many factors, but it will always keep an associated drain on the life bottle from its sustaining cost, and that cost must be reimbursed; its initial selling cost brings back the investment in the life bottle while the sustaining cost is a drag to it that must always come back from the market bottle, evidently there are many reimbursement options available.

Now, this is a possible path or way to satisfy the necessities of controlling things from fairness principles while having a safer system that won't crash every corner, but you still need to install strict limits as categories, which are better associated to our goals, as a value of importance (cool interfaces welcomed, I'd like to click on a goal and be shown where I could go work to get things better optimized). People can change the value of things, the exception to this should be basic, survival, or non-easily renewing resources, so if some alien drop a mountain of diamonds on you, their worth must get lower, and they must not make credits appear anywhere. The life point bottle represent humanity as a mass of blood, so you you can see as a reference point; everything amounts to some logic conclusion, ok everybody?

So the bottom line is the basis, and many more lines as categories of spending, reserved for different types of goods and services, reserved amount shown as that specific market bottle, and it is where you divide your reserved value among the goods on that market. Now you can do what you want and the life point bottle can't make a heart attack, all is missing is a smurf for the cork (you close all deals with a smurf, with some spirit if you prefer).

Any category can increase or decrease in value, you can stretch elastics everywhere but everything remains based on fairness or logical principles, so no psychopath that buys the pile of diamond to manipulate the market, the market is a social possession where individuals buy things, you buy diamonds as an individual thing, and if you want to build an industry to transform them, you pass by A&D groups and the life bottle.

Now, when we'll get things like whole cities from father reality, you can bet things will go crazy, and you may end up having buildings worth 100$, and nothing wrong with that as long as the drain on the life bottle fit and that you limit the number of building someone can buy. In theory you're supposed to dump whatever you want in the right category with the right proprieties, and the system will give it appropriate value while remaining neutral toward it.

I don't know how long it will take for things to work well, for all idiosyncrasy factors to end-up implemented, but we'll have to be connect-disconnect ready and capable of well gauging and transferring the value of things with "aliens", and for now, they are everybody on earth, including the new reality's people who will do all kind of funky things we may have too much trouble calculating the value of, which we will simply want at the lowest price possible, but always in an optic of being fair. An example of this is a good painter, some touches are more valuable, so you can't pay the work of a painter solely from the time he invested.

So we'll need people who understand and got a good mind to make things highly functional right from the start, which I believe entirely possible, I just have to look at how many game developers work to be convinced. And it's not the end of the world complex, so get those economic minds on something else than capitalism, or listen to the suggestion of "inferior" people getting kicked to the streets instead (me lately, because I'm a good person in hell, I end up deadly sick sleeping in dormitories, it's where people with my attitude end-up, my place it seems, so I should find plenty of souls to exchange quality thinking, I'm sure of it!). Maybe current financials would be inadequate though, too many things are different, you're being explained a quick visit through another civilization; It will sound bizarre, impossible and wrong all along. In my mind it's all working though, where this reality is globally failing in almost all the most important facets of life.

As for my associations, I put life points in the bottle as my association of it as people's life energy, the beating bottle as the heart of the reality; credits are communication numbers of what quantity of life points (blood) you have access to, in this vision of things, for someone that prefers to have a good sounding association of the people's life energy worth with life.

And I can't have imagination in all matters, so impress me (I am, I see it everywhere, don't worry), but the more facets of the life reality that are imported from present ways (unconscious influences), the higher the risk that the life reality develop bad quirks as time passes. We'll have to resist hundreds years under influences with many exposed cracks, and that's under the best of scenario of fairness and help. Any copying we do from father reality will have to be studied with all their alternatives, it's the only way with copied stuff, pass it through a process of understanding to have the capacity and parameters to eventually do it from scratch in a better optimized way to your tastes (reverse engineer it).

Before continuing, I will specify that the philosophy is not country competition, but association, so while societies can make their own vision of a reward system (monetary system) mostly fitting our priorities and ideals, the basis principle and monetary structure must remain as the base everybody can attach to in minimal fairness. There will be cultural societies, but no more countries and their competitions and war machines production.

Next, whatever the simulation, things will still be relative at the beginning, a lot of drastic readjustments will have to be done, after a million people in the reality, you'll have some things to modify for sure. But they won't be painful things like some famines, or economic crisis that are painful for the sole reason that some leaders are too incompetent in exploiting their populations...There will be pains for us too, but nothing like what is permitted presently, you won't starve, or have to sell drugs, or become a prostitute because there are no jobs and you will die, that's not how it will work. Such readjustments will mainly be done to implement new or missing elements of fairness or readjustments of number dynamics. We'll make mistakes, we'll learn.

And don't forget that you'll have a basis intrinsic to the system, and it is meant for comfort; you're not supposed to feel stressed to have a job if you're living from the basis. Everybody have that basis, they do what they want with it, never a form to fill like you're taking a contract to do nothing every months, the reality or civilization is not an apart thing; it is you all. I don't like people "bumming" for survival, and we're way beyond that; the basis is not survival: it is comfort. We won't let citizens that are part of our reality be in troubles, we surely won't let them bum for money like they're inferior failures bumming the powerful for mercy, we won't stress "lazy" people to work like crazy until the system crashes and they end-up indebted or in troubles because they lost their job because they're too "lazy" or imbeciles to get one while the logic of production development is adding conflict in the mind; you can't get a job if there are no job, or if the system is wrong. And don't forget that comfort of good people is a priority to the civilization, comfort of evil people (or producers) is the last of our priority, all priorities pass before that one, we'll feed animals before feeding evil people, different eh? Increasing civilization wide basic comfort has tremendous value, but it can be dangerous too, comfort is not luxury.

We will build a basis from which we can become what we want as a civilization until there are no grave conflicts in our thinking, since we'll start from father reality with a brain-full of conflicts (divide and compete to reign), and those conflict will take time to end, and more time to heal, if understanding is there. The base will permit the morphing of reality to dynamically reflect our changing ways, we still have a lot of unknown territory to explore here, furthermore, this morphing will take reality form too, we will be thinking we have a better way to a situation and change things appropriately only to realize later that we were mistaken, the quest of either life is a long one...

Next, apart from reality goals which define its existence, our reality will have as a priority the circulation of life points (credits) to grow what people concerned want, then the priority tree will mostly help proportionally to number of people wishing something. We won't be able to satisfy everybody as the reality grows but in the end, when credits will circulate more freely, it will go through every minor wishes that don't enter into conflict with either the basic philosophy (we won't build you a "castle"), or the global judgment of the population (we won't let you run around naked if the population judged it a bad idea).

As for money stashers looking for their indispensability, you won't find it anymore, was that it? You did everything to make yourself indispensable but in fact you were the most expendable? As it should be in hell I guess, in a paradise it's different... But I'm bad, I have the business mind you know, comes with some games I played I suppose, but what I wanted to say is that it goes with the reality, that's just how things work, it's just that my opinion degenerates when they take the forms of too much luxury, as a poor guy having difficulties. In our reality people will be generally more comfortable and way richer globally, how is it possible? Well, isn't it the logic that is rising to the surface as I describe things? There is love selection too that will help, in part, and many other principles, all in all: by attitude. Some attitudes are better made for some ideologies, attitudes leading to the best systems for it. So while I write I'm determining the necessary principles that can lead to different attitudes leading to new knowledge and possibilities. With a different attitude, understanding is different too, that's why my vision of things may be unacceptable to many in this reality; we have different or opposite attitudes developed from having different experience of living, but let's say experiencing living from the last position you get a more global vision. I'm sure that make sense, but it's easy with these kind of thoughts to end-up generally rejected from lack of fitting science under the presumption that all I write are twisted fabulations, stuff to quickly dump for whatever reasons, but mainly because conflicting attitudes are overwhelming.

Living in our reality is like living comfortably, or better if you got the right attitude, which may be to contribute if everything makes sense to you, if not then we got to know, very different than the message I get presently fort my effort...What remains in the bottle is divided in 2 main categories, credits redistribution and creativity, which are closely related, since creativity is a general way to get all other categories optimized or less costly, thus freeing means for higher ladders of pay, or a higher basis, or more creativity, or stuff less costly, all kind of options.

All what's left of the bottle of life points after categorizing and crediting, is available for new creativity, this line may fluctuate a lot though, and instead of people stashing personal money, all what's left that you didn't spend it will be added as a potential you can directly take (your account) from the creativity category, proportionally in its under categories.

All is missing is indebting people not born to grow the creativity stash without paying or servicing anybody! I mean, we spent it all boss, as you asked, but now we got urgent things to do! Your mistake, I don't remember mentioning to dump it on stupidities, so adjust your things, pay the price and carry on. But, but, but, we just have to create fictional people! So let's put everything in the hands of evil, innocence is on the way, we're fucking like crazy, the future looks bright, so let's condemn them to our ways immediately. Buzz off, the other small problem is that it devaluates everybody, oh, and you got to reimburse your debt man, a debt is no better than a stash (a hole or a mountain), extremism in the eye of good and evil...But you're right, the principle is critical but can break everything, and we want people to use the creativity credits, and we want the manoeuver capacity, so what do we do? Everything that drain any category is under laws to get reimbursed within a set amount of time, so in fact our categories are debt categories, and we let the market deal with this debt in its own way (from principles and A&D), so as long as these categories are worth their weight no problem, and who's to steal stuff by the trucks with our personal file system and id system and no physical money? The question is how to limit appetite for the use of it, in theory A&D should do the job, but I'd like some principle that just fit too, to close the deal, I would say this is the place cultural societies should experiment different emphasizes, because they won't have the same priorities. Now we should have enough principle force to keep the lid on with big investments and the creativity category (the magic, the more you take the more morphing potential, or the faster, or the better, and the faster you reimburse the more you have available for more, but you prove your incompetence by failing that step too). So the power will mostly be open and available, and all categories will be doubled as a self-reflection of ongoing losses that will their related timers so we can intervene fast (debt may become a very complicated bundle of all kind of troubles, so we'll want some efficiency tools, including algorithms). And we'll need a big blatant counter to show that our people are worth 870 instead of 1000 if some categories have recurring losses, and people may accept it like that, like temporarily, but they can't make it their new 1000; pay your debt man. What they can do though, if the category need to be stressed for whatever reason, is to allocate more potential to it, but there will be less for other, or creativity. The max time slab of reimbursement, like for a big project (proportional), should be 50 years, beyond that you'll need very convincing budgeting to get a prolongation. If things fail, the debt will have to be slowly absorbed by the other categories over time, preferably creativity, and people are back to 1000. The other option if you don't want devaluation is to reserve a category, but that's like wasting morphing power, devaluation is just the reality of things. All along that we'll develop all kind of different emphasizes and optimizations algorithms, so that people can chose package of performance values easily on any facet of their economy. So we'll have emergency speeds and antelope speed, and overdrive algorithms which will be like the jet power thingy which will optimize the whole economy to avert crashes. All connect disconnect. I may be going a little far with the jet thing but I think I remain realist (got to be making a new reality...).

To use the means of the creativity category you have to build a sufficient justification to use them. You don't have to get a career for using big loads of credits, you don't have to stash it, the credits exist for you, the stash is yours, not some government country competition or gang that see it as a competition of who take the most from the other, it is 100% yours, personally, those trillions of credits are just waiting for your justification to use them, and that it is a very positive and creative job, very well rewarded if successful.

You create, draw and describe your project in a convincing fashion, creating the justification, and the people that are concerned decide, through an A&D group, to unlock the means for it, depending on priorities and judgment; people with their eyes on the pile of rocks and the goods are the investors (concerned people). If your project is too shaky, it will be quickly rejected with a mention of potential if there is, worth a backtracking amount for whatever the judgment structure decides of the worth of your effort, and options may be given; you may get a serious gift or amount of credits spread in the future or not, added to a normal salary if you can continue developing the potential of your project.

Projects are presented by anybody, learning institutions included; those will be encouraged to teach that ability. And never underestimate what can be done this way, your studies concern reality, the most useful thing you can learn is how to help it and make it better, so it is guaranteed that if such institution want to make a nuclear reactor, they will be on our priority list, but the reactor is not only for learning, it will provide power too, and the students involved will have that creation in their name, for life (nothing new), and some added credits over the basis just for the prestige (new).

So if you want to build a nuclear reactor in your backyard, you make a gross project with arguments and justifications, get it judged low level, pass or fail with reward options and expertise help if appropriate, then you can continue making your project, or abandon if your backyard was a critical condition to you, or if you wanted your personal reactor as a justification, no way such things can be acceptable to concerned people. And concerned people are concerned people, so those complaining that something will be ugly while they'll see it once or twice in their lives are not concerned people. Local things are local things, not the concern of someone on the other side of the planet. In the example of a big power structure, everybody is concerned, if they say yes, then localities may be pointed, and people there will judge if they want it. If nobody wants it, then it won't get built, alternatives may be developed, or we save power, or things crash until an adequate locality accept in the name of having sufficient power. If your project is good, or have sufficient potential, or just somewhat deficient or wrong, then the A&D judgment structure will deal with it at higher levels, it may be modified on the spot while judging, or a team of experts may be formed to help make it reality, things like that. Justification have tremendous importance, and isn't it what permitted all this in the first place? Good old justification, such a solid thing, almost palpable, but I'm in the wrong reality here, where a lot of it is a PMBBD tool in the hands of those who got the means is more like it, where you can justify lots of evil, throwing responsibility away from you with it.

All work being done can be calculated at the hour, so the ideal is to have sufficient computing power to beat things at that speed, you may even make it a power variable, that way you can adapt it to different power levels; running speed pumping and turtle speed self-protecting, almost too real. If you want to embark your systematization in a vessel, you may be better embarking a travel version with at slower update speed window to have more processing power to other things, while you carry a compressed "earth systematization" and history. Evidently, everything must have regenerative capabilities, and humans can regenerate things, so you embark humans. No? What do you think? You'll send a hard drive? On a self-intelligent computer that will create a humanity at the laser? Or 100% working fragile old machinery?

There is not much of a bad trip about quitting jobs and coming back here, the goal is to have the job done in the best manner, and if you have the system well connected to everybody, then it is easier dealing people around, people can even form more detachable teams, you can call for a job knowing someone appropriate will knock on your door soon after, done through throngs of computer algorithms, all related and working together.

Evidently, to make things easier, people will have to do their part while reality adapted algorithms and programs develop, which means people will have to simplify everything at first; always start simple then apply complexity if necessary, if people adapt or even like a simplicity level at some things, then please don't make things complex no end at tremendous cost as a priority for a few exceptions who like to play in the complexity of it. Computer power is not an infinity either you know, and we need a lot; the new reality will function with tremendous computing and communication power, specifically optimized for needs and resources too, our gadgetry will be different to care for limited resources, made to last while being versatile. And don't think you'll lose in the exchange; you'll win so much you won't believe it.

Overtime may exist, as some kind of buffer somewhere, but I don't see where that would be necessary with an adequate management and search engine. Both employees and employers will search each other and when they meet, a contract of work can be assigned, for a certain amount of time, to test the person. Salary is a contract, if a company wants to monopolize your time for 5 years, then the contract must detail the salary, and whatever the value of the job changes, the contract must be followed, but a work contract won't be an absolute here, it will be more like a moral engagement between the two and written in both file. Any reasons can be good to break a contract but those reasons will be in the file too and both must have somewhat the same reasons for breaking the contract, if not, an investigation can be called to find the truth. There's a price to pay for the use of a counterproductive in ideal machine such as the police or investigators, such professions should not exist, in a super ideal perfect utopia. Just don't think we'll kill you for it, house lies have not the same implication as reputation attacking lies, from which you can suffer your whole life, or history attacking lies from which the whole humanity can suffer from...

You can lock the access to the work part of your file after you get a contract, if you want, even if some stats on it will still be available to the central computer to know, through mainly numbers and statistification, where the reality is going and what and how needs are fulfilled, to seek points where competition should be increased or encouragements given, mainly by increasing work value or giving rewards, and to know where a standard or trend is developing or can be developed (and take appropriate actions to judge if they must be encouraged or discouraged), etc. A&D groups can be created if there is the need for the development of an expertise at judging and deciding in such matters. If a contract ends, the reason will be written on the file of both people, there will be a button or a tab in the work part of your file that have information on your work experiences, each one of those parts can be locked but the employer name will still be available and too much locked information won't make you the best candidate for a job.

A work structure can take any form, some need a manager with a fat pay and many workers on a same level of lower pay, some will require absolute obedience to a pyramidal structure of separation of responsibility etc, etc. As long as people get their minimal due set by reality. Businessmen borrow (and reimburse) their inventories from the market categories, if they produce something it is sold at its right place, if they develop creativity they'll have an inflow from the creativity (risk) category. Evidently, the global judgment way of reaching a decision has priority (A&D). One difficult thing to do will be to find the right equilibrium for the ladder of pay quickly.

It took all of history to adjust this reality's pay system to ego standards, creating the life reality won't be easy, there will be all kind of mistakes, debordments, adjustments, failures, missing things; a lot of work trial and error will be done, some things will take years to get working properly. We're talking about a new reality here, based on a fundamentally different philosophy, not a variation of the same thing.

I want a reality I'll be happy to live in, but I don't want it only for me, so I surely don't dream of bossing people around, I deduct basic principles on which a civilization of good can exist and I tell you to do something like it if you got it because I believe it should exist, whatever I hate this reality or not, so I'm known in my soul put aside personal grudges for the betterment of life, but for now there is nothing going my way and the grudging is growing disproportionally...). And I do what I have to do, don't think you're suppose to know better than me what I'm supposed to do, or how big a human I can be when god is your ideal, and I can't only do this with my life, this is becoming a fixation and it grew so much frustration and even rage sometimes, and my situation and environment is so shitty, that I'm at the end of my nerves, and I believe I'm way beyond what I should have tolerated. So you can say that I didn't do enough, to condemn me eternally to work on this, while condemning yourself too, my part is a vision, one amongst millions, you'll have to expand from that, make simulations for a start. Success mean you'll have a reality with very different goals, ideals, emphasizes, where everybody is comfortable, no worthless stress, more mentally healthy, not made for ego gods living in luxuries, but made for humans, humanly associated, not divided; but creating it will take lots of work, even sacrifices. The way of creation is to create then take it easy.

Every job has a priority, or an indispensability value, and the ladder of pay will be in big part proportional to that. Good food growing has priority over expensive professional sports and entertainment; show it, if humans only work for entertainment, then get lost. So, credit transfer will be decided mainly from logical rules such as the goals of society, the necessity, priority, rarity of the work, the personal situation of the people, the difficulty of filling competency exigencies, etc. For now, we'll say that most companies, industries and service structures of pay are all right, a bit more at the bottom, a bit less at the top, and you can adapt the structure approximate value of work and ways to our reality's ways without much of a problem, if not for the way of money. I like independent people, normal (normal) businessmen are ok people to me, and I surely won't want this facet out of the reality, so I see nothing wrong if they take the amount of credits proportional to the people they employ and manage everything themselves, in fact many business models may be developed to be appropriate to the our reality's ways, and they may choose one, it may even be seen as the way to do things, and reality may let competition take place at that level and concentrate on all the basis facets of things. But if you like to micromanage and interact with your employees then it has to show, I understand that relaxing can be a part of success, but don't pass the job of micromanaging to someone else so you can do nothing except party with the likes of yourself on an island.

Over time, dynamic indispensability value of work will readjust things through the judgment of a specific A&D group, and people losing value will have to accept it or do something else. If you do some limited work for someone and the pay is not given by society but by the person, like if you do a job for your neighbor, then time is not accounted for. The transaction is subtracted from one personal file and added to the other, never touching the bottle of life points, which is a social thing spent on society stuff provided by society's structures, the same for the basis time.

So there's nothing to stop people making medium level business of all kind this way, anything you can think of, but the central computer will search for anomalies, like number of transactions, personal enrichment, or transformation of work as objects. Possessed object that are already traded or bought from the reality can be traded through your file at the value you want, or not. You can do illegal stuff too, you'll have that right, no structuring or loans though, between adults and without pub, and even if I'm not happy about it, you're between independent adults. The limitations imposed by the reality for dangerous stuff adds an interdiction to have stores, no business. If you want to produce crack, you can do it for use between friends, exchange it for something, trade it on your file, that's the spirit, and you won't be a criminal as long as an evident market doesn't exist.

There is nothing to stop other free markets existing, once the reality has "apposed" its price, the item, or company, or service, is out of its hands, things can be traded between people without the need to involve it past a certain point; a lawnmower is a lawnmower, an industry is an industry. And you can sell back objects in any way you want without unneeded complexities since objects cannot be taxed, then someone else can buy the objects, but objects devaluation must be taken into consideration. See it as the ebay of our societies, but contrary to ebay, you won't find people that will charge taxes on used items. Societies, as cultures, can buy anything this way, old stuff, current reality's stuff, whatever, it's like old production that has already been paid for, but its existence is still a proof of human energy expenditure, and the genius of life.

Now, for some efficiency and sense, the original price (green) is set by production calculation, but people can change the price they're ready to pay for something by using A&D groups with available expertise. You can see it as a trade market with charts, but the basic price of things must always exist as a bottom line, and it must be shown beside the modified value, like food stores do. And the ring on arteries principle can work too, where categories and under-categories have a limited "budget" seen as a ring that control flow, people can modify flow affecting others flows, the basic value is the actual truth of things, but you can raise it or lower its value, resize the rings, at the price of others values or you can resize the main ring by going through a more specialized and concerning more people step of A&D groups.

It would be cool if we could have our credits directly and dynamically associated to our goals, but that may be difficult to achieve. Still, it can be somewhat attained if you have a dynamically changing global judgment interface that is sufficiently simple and efficient, with that you could pour credits on a progress slider of civilization goal and the system would distribute it at most appropriate under related goals or sliders, while keeping micro management available. That would accelerate greatly the budgeting of many facets of reality, don't forget that things are decided by people concerned by them, so you don't want people to feel like they have a chore to accomplish, the interface must be sufficiently simple and enjoyable for people to actually like it because they are free to do it or not, to the extent they want. Now, such a system would need a main buffer so that people can control progress momentum by transferring their credits to other progress sliders in advance for smooth transition toward new values, you don't want a sudden death and flushing of expertise if an accident happens or if a goal is reached, and you don't want to waste time and energy repositioning people's energy. But such options must be explored in advance since computers are kind of idealistic, or fatalist, at the extreme, far worse than me...

If you come to have something that looks like a business with employees, you'll be under reality's limitations, that way you won't exploit people and employees will be timed. Anyway, you'll have a hard time starting a business without the involvement of your society's judgment of those. Reality (I prefer to see societies as half independent bubbles within reality (like if your country was a pack of related bubbles instead of a vast piece of land). The "civilization" word got an old feel to it from all the historic use, tainted by the ego-god ideology I could say (from what you imagine), so I don't use it often, except to describe historical process that need to be seen under that optic). We'll want societies to distribute reality's loans, without interest, like it's your credits, but it (people concerned) is taking a risk and logic says that it will want to gain back its investment, and that will go back in the bottle because it is there that the stash is, personal stashes are limited because nobody go beyond an upper limit of profit for himself, reality wide, you're not supposed to be proud doing things to become an unfair person, but you're definitively supposed to be proud of doing positive things for many people, and you don't want to scrap that positive by being too costly on other facets. Evidently things depend on the way the business and structures are run and built.

So people with projects can sell those projects to the reality, which will pay well creativity, particularly if the projects are well done and described. Such projects can be worth a pay over the basis for the rest of you or your team's life even if they do nothing else ever. Then concerned people will decide everything about it while keeping the creators involvement for as long as the project don't become reality, ideally. That mean industries, business, services are a reality thing in part and a society part too.

So you understand that the notion of profiting now can't be a bad thing, profit from our reality, but do it fairly. In fact that's all there is to do, make everything and everybody and life profit, since you don't have to grow a beard understanding in what the heck your mother landed you...A person wants to do everything itself, even distribute and sell a product or service and decide his own pay and the one of its employees? It may do it through his society, but we don't want the boss to become too rich or exploit its employees. And a contract must exist to reimburse reality's loan and expenses until the reaching of neutral value everywhere it's involved, in which case that part of the profits would be subtracted from the price of the production or service, the rest is an added bonus to the business, or something like this, just don't forget those price categories are controlled by the cultural society so we have more economic diversity, so some types of business models may not be available to them.

This is where I'm coming to, the understanding that this vision should not be mistaken for ego ideology thing, the life reality is in fact the composition of many cultural societies, and the distinction is made by what should be managed reality wide, and what should be managed by cultural societies. The reality got its vision tool or interface, at that level people will see these categories, clicking on a category will show details of everything going on, including where and by who, the part of the market that a cultural society is emphasized on. What it means is that when people open their interface, they'll see the bottle and market emphasizes of their society, or if you prefer, everything comes from somewhere and the reality distribute its means to cultural societies, with an emphasis on emergencies and its goals and ideals, and those societies are better bring back credits to the life bottle fast or be efficient in something important if they want more big projects or developments, it will even be a criteria for some people when they'll decide things, the attitude of different societies, because yes, there's a best attitude to be had with everything.

The terms of reimbursement may be variable in function of steps accomplished by the business, the service, or the part one does in the total chain of production. When the structure is wholefully reimbursed in the bottle and no further cost are subtracted, meaning the structure is self-functioning and reimbursed, the part of profits that is supposed to go in the bottle is eliminated for whatever benefit to the business or cultural society. As long as there is potential for reimbursement, the structure is birthing. We'll have a bottom line, but we won't put interest pressure, if the reality judge you're making an effort, or that potential still exist, it will extend time of reimbursement. That's the basic idea, adjusting everything is done by specialized A&D groups while keeping in mind that structures and projects concern people of an area and so the project will be judged and decided by the appropriate A&D groups.

All that doesn't make sense doesn't it? I think it does, nobody can exchange credits without going through reality's heart since everything that exist come from the will of people concerned. No tools can exist without society's contribution at building or distributing those tools, one way or the other. Next, nobody exchanges credits without individual decision. Once a tool is bought, it is used freely by anybody; you want to give it to someone? Go ahead, you want to sell it? No problem. Once a tool or service is exchanged, reality's involvement is done, it is free, you do what you want with it, no tax. One way or the other, tools are not supposed to end-up in the garbage without being worthless.

The reality seeks neutral value, it doesn't seek profits, meaning once the structure have been made to build the tools, it seeks to get back the credits it used in the building (loan), then it stops gaining credits from the tool or service to reimburse the construction, and switch the greater gain to lower the cost of the tool or service to come back neutral toward it. One way or the other the credits go back for new projects or whatever else the reality or people have as a goal. If the bottle fills itself fast enough, people can increase the basis, do bigger projects or whatever. Now, everything is global, if concerned people decide the tool must be made less expensive through an A&D group, it will be so, they'll have different options, but if they switch too many things below the neutral line, as I already explained, they may have to increase the price of other things, or reduce spending to keep on filling the bottle at the speed they want to build stuff or sustain loans or basis or services.

The default value of an object is based on its production cost, lifetime, rarity and other things, but once it is in the hands of the society (people) its value can be modified for whatever goals, if people (or a culture) want to smoke less of something, they can increase the price, no need for a tax, it will affect the production structure, but too bad, the less people want of something, that can be wishes, the less production of it there should be and vice versa, the good side is that when you increase the price of something you can lower the price of something else, for some time.

For now you're nothing, even worth death if you don't have a job, the richer the more human value, poorer people are not seen as humans but as a bus of problems if they can't be profited from or if they don't profit from others, and that is a condemnation, a systemized interdependent thing you cannot change. In our reality, you are not dependent of a job unless you decide to be, people in our reality are all worth it and so poverty will only exist by obstination, if some hobo thinks he's into some prestige to it, whatever they're in a paradise, we'll let him hang around, but don't make us feel bad. We know jobs are meant to be lost, so we act like we do, and when a job is not needed anymore, you are not in death troubles from losing your value to reality, you are human and you are worth it. Presently, a killer have more actual true worth than me, if poorer people want to increase their worth to this reality, they can kill and it will spend more life energy on them, increasing their value while decreasing other's, that's the weird thing.

As for resources, if two resources require the same effort at mining, and one manipulates his worth of effort because his resource is rarer, then I'll remove the cheater. Even under a business model, resources is a reality thing, we pay miners for their needed expertise, risks, efforts and things like that, we don't pay them in function of the rarity of the resource since credits is high consciousness life effort value, and so a resource is a divided transformation of this as matter, which have 0 value in itself, but as soon as humans start touching it, it gains a value in numbers, we count, the rock doesn't count (don't twist that to a facebook meme, the rock counts, I'm talking counting on your fingers, it doesn't ok?).

After the resource is mined and transformed, its basic cost in weight is deducted from the value given to the human effort involved, all involved objects and services, and developing pollution dealing cost, all that dependent on lifetime of everything. From that point, the resource is accounted for and distributed by reality since the life effort is paid for.

Now, that's only the most basic level of the market, as resources are transformed they get categorized the proper way; industries transforming the basic resource to a more useable form are another level, with added pollution costs to their new products, other levels can be a person or a company making a final product, with new pollution costs. And that view doesn't stop the resource from having a different price than its real cost in human life energy, it is just the baseline, it is all a question of what people want the final cost of it to be in the end.

The market is there, based on solid equilibrium, everything will be categorized and equilibrated in judgment by the most massive, because it is top A&D of the global equilibrium structure, quantity of people all over the reality. Even at that level, people have their say, it is their market, but the bottom line enforces equilibrium; if you increase the price of something, you must lower the price of something else, that's why categories are important, each associated to a A&D group; nothing to do with an artificial offer and demand unfair system controlled by some financials gangs protecting their precious in forever more bullshit with words and experts dropped from the moon, or a selected expertise that make profits from salivating at numbers all day and guessing it out on speed and energy drinks.

It may be logical for higher demand or lower supply to justify higher prices, but in an this reality where people are a competition ground for profits, anything can be used as an argument to either modify prices or supply, and what does it reflects? Truth? I can force you to buy something you know, stop all PMBBD on masses and you'll see tremendous variations in demand, as much as if you blow up an industry for supply to become more limited, what I mean is that many factor can influence the price of stuff, and in an this reality, it is maximally variable from human factors that can be manipulated, most of which are not even supposed to be related to the value of things. Currently, the free market is just a nice concept that manipulators used to justify the building of more ego gangs, it is too relative, can be given any funky value with PMBBD, and finally, how in hell does it end-up justifying capitalism or privatization? Particularly when those providing supply are the ones with the greatest desire for profits? And it's not simpler than any other way to give an appropriate value to things, in fact, the best value of something should be given by the greatest judgment base available, where all factors are taken in consideration, and the main factor that shouldn't be in the equation is making a personal stash as a goal. The free market, even if it is a valuable concept, is entirely dependent from the competitive drive of people; people buy as low as possible (give as little as possible) and the other side sells as high as possible beyond the base price of production (tries to take as much as possible), with competition to limit it. How does that proves an adequate judgment base to give a value to something?

You will have the basic cost in production of the resources of these categories, then within severe limitations, some of which will definitively concern rarity, those values will be changed by people, by some time slab or other possible more dynamic process, as they gain experience. As the system becomes competent, more limitations can be lifted from the market permitting people greater variations of price.

People get their due, directly or indirectly by business interposition, for their work and what they produce is then adjusted over time by people or factors like pollution, rarity etc. The evident problem is availability or rarity. You can pass your life working hard, getting paid from all kind of principles that make sense to deduct the worth to the civilization of your life energy expenditure and all, but if, as a young person, a meter big diamond fall in front of you, all you'll have to do will be to slap a billion buck price tag on it for supreme rarity that only happens once in the history of a species, and you'll be done for the rest of your life, getting served by "love" babes (always), buying yachts (always), planes and big homes, having the world at your feet, so, what do we do with that? We know we can't give the same value to things from the same amount of energy spending making it or getting it, we can't give it life value, we can't tax it, so the only fairness simple possibility would be to pay people for getting it, then, as I already explained a few paragraph back, the object can be sold at its rarity value and the difference between getting it and selling it can be transferred somewhere else, so people don't waste rare resources, instead, plentiful resources can cost less or whatever else transfer of worth people decide that would be best. But that's not the sole option, industrial deals can exist for self-made entrepreneurs who like to deal with a micro reality, building and running successful industries and businesses in responsibility is surely not a skill we'll want to limit too much. As for the guy that found the diamond, he can be paid at market value because I like treasure, and we'll want lottery too, but some limitation must exist somewhere, like 50/50, but there's nothing wrong with being given an increase in revenues, everything in the pockets of the guy to the maximum of half max salary for half a standard lifetime (the treasure can be sold at market value).

That's vague as a start, but the basic idea is there, as for exchanges of values, where all the troubles are, the way to see it is as a quantity of force (credits), where everything is continually adjusted for fairness and equilibrium, the programming set limitations, transform and exchange values, to become more appropriate, without affecting the fundamental, life points bottle, value of credits. But don't stick to death to what I wrote, you have imagination too, which can be adequate if you understand. You know a diamond is worth more than steak, even if both things are very different, yet the work to get it may be the same in value; we currently deal with the problem with a philosophy that grew from time immemorial, and it is not an example of a working system of value exchange, none exist yet, and everything proves it, look at helium for an extreme, there are simply no reason for its wrong value except profit, and if a technology suddenly needed helium seriously, all the stuff produced with helium in it have a wrong value, and that applies to the whole economic system, competition, cheating and profiting spread wrong values all over, and that's in part understandable since these values are solely dependent on human attitudes, nobody on earth will set a value to things except a human, and so it is a reality philosophy thing.

And that exposes the need to stick people to being paid for their value toward life or civilization goals, not objects; even if you divide the effort at growing mushes by the pound, the effort may not be much bigger than getting at diamonds, and don't tell me there is a big difference, what I need is you understanding is that you cannot pay people from the final value of the object because you fall down an ego trap and competition for profiting will automatically produce a vastly unfair reality where miners are paid a minimum while the guy selling is rich. If you want another kind of reality, people must not collect diamonds because of profiting, but because they want diamonds, and don't worry, people want diamonds whatever the reality, so you'll have diamonds.

I should repeat, for people who will try to demolish my view because it doesn't include the complexities capitalism invented, that we'll work in a no worse manner than we currently do, we'll even start far better, but still simple, at the abacus, a computer abacus you can load with far more data right from the start, but you still got to work from a start, not a final system you try to transform as a start, and a start is not a million mentally condemned final people, it is a few very strongly willing ones, something between 10 000 and 100 000 can do the starting job, or far more, it all depend on the strength of will you can manage while keeping integrity.

Our priority philosophy concerning people, after survival evidently, is fairness, while knowing that a perfect system of value is probably impossible to attain, and surely not a final one made before beginning. What we must have is a way to give work values rightly, while humans decide to change objects and services value as they want, following principles, everything stand on good fairness principles; the thing you absolutely don't want is breaking the bottle from exaggeration or inapt transfer system that grows credits in trees or make credits disappear.

So our reasons for getting diamonds will be different, the reality doesn't even need you to get diamonds, what it need is to give the job sufficient worth, and that worth can be transformed, a ladder of pay, advantages, gifts, you are not limited to credits, always try to get at the most worthwhile direct channel of value of work, people have all kind of preferences that can be advantageous to both, if it is less costly to reality to transform a part of a salary as a nearby free servicing, then the person may like it better too, but I don't need to explain that, we currently do well on that facet because no choice about it, but I wouldn't take country competition as an example of that.

Don't think the diamond will end up in unfair pockets, diamonds are a basic resource and concern everybody, they are accounted for all the way to business using them, the collector cannot put them in its pockets because there is no physical money; how would he profit from them without passing by the system? Troc? (exchange of physical objects, bartering in English) go ahead, less dependence, more efficient, more direct, more complete as a job, your personal choice, we don't tax objects, as long as you're fair, if you're not fair to reality standard, then you're out because you'll grow back a cancer. Anyway, you'll eventually need physical money and an independent communication system, and at that point you'll be noticed by the central computer making the connection, from some source, like a personal file area on a map showing a financial anomaly or habit anomaly which will be straight sent to the appropriate A&D group, probably ending up concerning that area, and a decision is taken, publicly, and nothing to stop a Chinese watching the action on his computer in China.

Such things may be quite simple and fast to deduct so whatever people want to be involved in the decision process or not is up to them, and how do you decide that? Always the same way, through an appropriate A&D group, which may remove hassles from the system this way, and the hassle here is not the guy with a pocketful of brute diamonds, it is the one with a regular briefcase of finished ones, which should show somewhere, to permit automatic intervention, and an investigation on the anomaly, a process you made automatic with a bunch of parameters and when the computer detect a scenario that fits it do something, call it algorithms or AI to make it sound big brains or dangerous all you want it's just simple programming logic. Everything works from stuff you decided in advance.

But always put water in your wine, not in a literal sense, but that's a reason why we're human, you don't load guns if the loss to reality is insignificant, that's why I said "an anomaly of the level you decided in advance", that way you can go to the extent of accepting a fundamental black market drain or falsehood of data, maybe more pronounced for some societies, since people are supposed to work some time to have the basis and citizen status, so if people really want to make sideline credits and the economy works well and can cope with the variation, then go ahead, why make those people unhappy? But you're still working against the reality. The same for evil, we can ignore some level of it, depending what, and it won't show on your file, but everything is a question of system security too, you don't want to be suddenly surprised seeing the bottle going crazy; very bad.

So, if the value exchange system works well, people as a society, all concerned, can modify values for whatever reason that make sense, through an A&D group dealing with the subject. Still, the credit system is not based on value of objects but on the value of high consciousness life energy, meaning that fundamental life-points (credits) value in the bottle is solely variable from that, not objects or services, the fundamental calculation of the object or service value is based on that life value. Objects and services involved in new production, which become part of new production, can be either calculated at reality getting price if the reality provides the means or at full price if it is a personal challenge or either solution across the board, or whatever best ways where I'm wrong.

Now, I don't have a single point of expertise here, I'm poor and I don't deal well my budget, so don't be too hard on me, even if I should permit you some harshness with the quantity I throw around, but I feel bad about it, and it is true, sometimes, but I have to do this, if not you wouldn't understand the critical, right now or die, need for another way, and I'm very far from done with this stuff. So don't think I enjoy all that super much, but I try, sometimes a bit too hard I know. I want to live better someday, to start living as a human for a start, I'm full, I could do many other more interesting things with my life, I have tons of things I wish to do, and they are slowly disappearing to oblivion as I write, this takes too much of my time, and however serious I'd like to be in the future, I need a break now or I'll bust a gasket, and I surely don't want to end-up as an old that lament on its past difficulties, that step should be behind me...

Besides, isn't it a prerequisite for sanity to express negative feelings? And it's not me that invented that one, and what about at civilization level? I guess you missed that one and the result may be...insanity? I want that stuff to end here before it is worthless trying, why do you think people just adapt? You think they'll waste their life trying to figure out some sense out of this mess?

We'll need a lot of computer number crunching ability, everything will be as live as possible, no end of the year tax forms to fill and money to reimburse, a few million less paper shufflers, less inefficiency. There should be nothing beyond the reach of a young person in how we separate people's credits for their own uses and the uses of global structuring and reaching of reality's ideals. It is important that the youth understand completely the reality they live in, they must see it make sense and be done with it without passing their lives exploring the complexity of the basic system they live in, and that is worse than inefficiency. They must know fast they are not being cheated and pass their time exploring other complexities than the system they live in. No complexity, we'll minimize these inefficiencies, headaches, and far more, meant to fool people, hide stuff and fuck their judgment. There are no poor and no unfair rich (to some extent) so it is easy to see people can't exaggerate too much. And having no tax eliminates the like hood of some group of people, like age groups, giving themselves advantages by voting on a lowering of taxes on this or that thing, even if the decision can always be modified by voting it all over again by a more appropriate A&D group. If they want advantages, they'll have to change the value of their work globally.

As for services, people will have a basis and they pay the extra. Service offered, user payer. Reality makes the structure and start of it and the people using the service, over time will have to divide the maintenance cost between themselves. (I'm talking about specific uses of services, a market is a service but the can of bean is specific to you). People will have to make their project well and choose to be given services in the best fashion since the reality will not give a service if its building cost can't be made neutral over a reasonable amount of time, unless people collectively decide to push the neutral point farther in time or consider the service, or part of it, as a basis item.

And yes you can do it indefinitely but the more things that are not neutral or that are made a basis item, the less building and emergency power there is in the bottle, and the slower it refills between projects or the less projects can be undertaken or the less help there will be if critical situations happens. Unless you give birth to people. You understand that the more people, the more life points in the bottle and the faster it replenishes, the bigger it can grow, the more powerful the reality is and the more projects can have longer neutral point reaching. Yet, there is a limit to quantity of people, there's an equilibrium point to reach here, between general mental health, wild life, pollution, resources, etc.

And when we give services, those won't be given by expensive institutions that protect powerful legal criminals against the little people with the help of throngs of neutral lawyers, services exist to make the life of a maximum of people easier, not protect a few rich bosses. You're not supposed to waste your time getting what you're supposed to get, you're not supposed to enter in a competition or war against an enemy governmental institution to get justice.

Any service that increases efficiency or have a neutral efficiency will have to be implemented as a basis and that makes it almost all services, as the main reason for a service in most case is to increase efficiency, but the cost of giving services to ego overwhelmed people can be crushing enough to invalidate any efficiency. Like hospitals that are supposed to increase efficiency by keeping people healthy but too much spending in truly expensive medicine (not expensive because it's a monopoly) may render them neutral in efficiency or even counterproductive through inefficiency.

It is hard to know the efficiency value of hospitals, that's why such services will be complex things to judge to find the best solution. You can easily say that staying healthy is a good goal and get credits circulating in that direction as a minimally neutral efficiency value but how do you deal with medicine? Chemicals can be expensive to produce, they can totally stop the heart pumping life points elsewhere if everybody feel they need medication for their party, along old people who feel they're entitled to live eternally? It may end up as one difficult thing to judge globally as to how to deal with it. Personally, I'd build and run the structures, make a free basis for everybody, and give people a good health basis in youth as a philosophy to easily carry-on through one's life

The basis could include one choice of a variety of painkillers and one choices of a vitamins or minerals complex chosen out of personal preference, or a specific greater need of that person for one in particular, for any kind of other reasons, like a tendency to develop a lack, training hard, smoking or a doctor recommendation. You will choose from a list, surely longer than the list on your multivitamin bottle, but they won't be big formulas, they will mostly be individual things or something around 3-5 parts formulas can be acceptable, and no big dosages, it is not an industry for profits, it is a basis expense, the pills won't be big and a bottle will last, your daily food is not supposed to be missing a crushed mega pack of vitamins. And I don't believe multivitamins formulas compacted together are that much good, we absolutely don't know if everything in there is good in direct interrelations, some things may be for some, but bad for others; you can still produce these, but they won't be available for the basis.

As for sicknesses and accidents, they are healed by the basis too, to some limited extent; don't think we're supposed to replace your heart every 6 months, or give you the most expensive medication for the rest of your life. And no pharmaceuticals company will exist for profit anymore, and we won't exploit life no end to bring you your overdose, or satisfy your fears, so if you want an omega supplement, it won't be 3 gigantic pills a day, to satisfy some pharmaceutical industries competition for a market or profit; nobody eats a salmon for dinner every day, and you don't become a moron if you don't do it. I'm a person that like fish, but good fish is too expensive for me, in the last 10 years I've eaten fish once a month, sometimes less, enough to fill a few of those pills, not 10 000! That's why I'm such a stupid man some will say, but that's not my opinion, even if my environment tend to prove the contrary... Maybe they act more like anti-depressives than anything else, and this reality needs the stuff in exponential quantities, but again, I'm not depressive even if I don't take any stuff that is supposed to raise my spirit. When we'll have emptied the ocean of fish to "love" this reality, maybe the truth of us will finally surface and everybody will make a fundamental depression and stop encouraging it. Those megatons of anti-depressors and drugs are only filling the criteria for accepting and tolerating a situation, we're simply forcing selection of the appropriate chemistry to make us happy in this reality; I call that stretching the elastic too far.

That may be appropriate for pharmaceuticals, but maybe I'm exaggerating for those omegas, I do believe they are good and I wouldn't discard the heart benefits, but you know what I think of all those benefits and pressure selection we make for those. I say you're supposed to eat a fish a few times a week and that's it. But with all those pharmaceuticals industries dreaming of more profits, including the "natural' ones and those that sell a particle in water, there's no way to know the truth anymore, most is very costly and counterproductive PMBBD placebo, enough so people should go play baseball in those pharmacies, take a snowplow to clear those alleys and make a pile, then throw some gas to make a chemical fire. But be careful playing with that mix, it's full of anti-depressives and benefits, you could bury an evil pharmacist that like to be paid sex trips from pharmaceuticals industries, question of taking good care of different kind of people free, so be careful not to bury one under by accident, and give birth to a dependent chemical superhero... And don't tell me I'm destroying useful stuff, I know, and I know medicine works with good doctors, there's big knowledge and science there, but there's a market brothel too, and how can I trust a professional with antibiotics? Or vaccines? I'm supposed to need these things, but you totally lost my trust, not only with the facts, but with my personal experience, those vaccines they gave me in the army made me sick for life, they cost me a big slab of my health, and I don't give a shit the bullshit, it is just a fucking fact to me! Profiteers and doubtful science made a mess of that industry, it has so little credibility that I wonder if I shouldn't go back 3000 years and get myself some genuine shaman medication... Even if you use the saintly clean white godly coat on a cute well paid girl to sell your product (actual pub), I still have doubts, like for many other good things this reality manipulated (I'm not talking about truly effective chemical pharmaceuticals, I'm talking about the free market stuff). Probably half of it is unneeded exploitation to fill some rich's pockets, it have no use, it pollute people and the earth like crazy and it end-up eaten by life, and a vast majority of this stuff is dumped everywhere in the environment when the expiration date is reached, and don't worry, there are exemplary industries in the throng that are not. The same for vaccines, often coming from PMBBD pressures from pharmaceutical industrialists to get government's (your) money, the same for antibiotics, the same for many far superior biological markets that are eliminated from good healthy food industrials licking the ass of politicians...However, I believe that with an appropriate associated knowledge base of truth in our reality, we'll get out of that.3/8

So the basis will provide appropriate vaccines (100% our production and the science will have to be redone by us) and antibiotics, appropriate checkup, credit for sports, even a psy visit, yes that, but maybe that one will be a choice among other things, and I'd have a tendency to believe that this expertise can be integrated in the school and medical structure, to some extent, so our psy will be of higher expertise than what's trying to buzz around me these days...Psychiatrists we'll need for sure, for more serious situations that probably require special medication. And to reverse engineer what the heck is my problem so you finally gain some doubtful understanding, we should not forget that...

All that is a part of the same basis system that will help keep people healthy if they want. More expensive care and use of the service will be given through different means; one necessary medication or care may be given, you can get another from a choice of gifts, you can take an insurance to pay for some, credit is available to some extent too, and, evidently, you can pay directly. In the end, when we will be successful, there is nothing to stop people from spending far more means on the medical structure.

For now, the goal is to give reasonable care without people abusing, because that's the only reason why it's complicated, if it was not for people abusing we'd give it free hassle free and be done with it. I guess insurances will be a good help in that direction but we must not forget that "bad luck" is compensated (to some extent). And people "abusing" include rich doctors, a lot think too much of money these days, or running anywhere in the world where they can be seen as gods or where the stash is bigger, publicizing their professions like they're miraculous saviors from heavens. Go easy on the money and the opinion you have of yourselves, it will save and create as much life as you save. I may be exaggerating a little and there are many great people in that profession, a lot overworked, who end up "serving" inferiors like me in a best system of the world, in the best country of the world... And carving people with a scalpel won't be the greatest of our priority; in my corner people have easier access to doctors making mammal implant or plastic surgery than good doctors, so much it is ridiculous.

Finally, credits will be used to bring compensations to people for "bad lucks" and exceptional deeds, but we prefer everybody to seek to increase their personal value toward reality too; a motivated blind can be very valuable. If you remember how I see good and bad luck, to help life you have to compensate or help in bad luck scenarios.

The basis credits will be distributed as classes of spending too, with a different minimal amount "distributed" by the society for all of these classes, if you go over the amount; you pay. It's to provide better options for people too, like for a culture that will want to provide the basis differently. So the basis will be categorized to have a different amount that you can spend on food or electricity etc, and going over that amount will be subtracted from your credits total availability (your pay).

As an example, Intuits may be hard to reach with roads at first and we want them to travel, so they'll be developed more with planes in mind and their basis of transportation may take the form of a certain quantity of plane trips a month or some distance, instead of a bus or train pass.

You'll have a basic quantity of electricity, a basic bandwidth of communication, a good computer, a basic apartment, transport, and I'm surely missing something. That is for everybody without exception, hassle free, and the cost of it will be that everybody, if they are healthy, will have to make themselves available for around 18 hours a week, to do some activities or work for the reality, or even companies, free. (24H-9H sleep X 6 days = 90H/18 = 5). That mean you work less than 1/5 of your time to have the basis, which, as you're starting to see, is quite something. That's why even 2/5 could be acceptable, depending on the cost of it or the situation of the reality, but eventually, as things develop, you may end-up working more or less hours. This starts at 18 or even younger for those who want, and the basis is used by everybody, meaning that whatever you got a permanent job or not, you'll have to go over that to have personal credits surplus, in the sense that 18 hours a week of whatever job. Now, just remember that I said "make yourself available" and it means there is no cost to you if society fails to use you.

The basis is always there, everybody got it, no forms to fill, and you cannot end-up in uncomfortable troubles. Now, if you don't want to work 18 hours or more, it will be cumulated as a virtual time debt. A number that means nothing, because I think just showing it is enough, but I see nothing wrong if people lose some small bonus advantages from cumulating too much time debt, like some gifts choices which may become unavailable. It will keep some characters more active too.

All that will be done through, as always, your personal file which will contain the information as to how many hours you made yourself available and how many hours you actually helped. And you don't stress yourself too much finding work, it's as much your effort doing it, as an external effort, and if there is not enough work for available people the basis time will be dynamically changed, and under some circumstances, a basis time debt can be reduced or erased, the reward system of the reality can take many forms. You write about what you can do through your personal file and you can search for work as much as the employer, or reality, can search for you through a search engine. And the employer is under the same rules, he's paid by the reality too, he cannot profit from the situation.

Both can give their appreciation of the other through a simple form made of a few question marks. As for the normal pay structure, it is increased with the level of competence, by the reality's dynamic ladder of pay for every kind of work that can be done. This is judged through a specialized A&D group. Evidently, this can be mixed with instruction, and someone may sign a contract with you for some stable help for some time.

Everything will go through the "curriculum vitae" part of your file. There you'll find options to visualize your side and the employer's side, you write your wishes for work, the lowers, the higher, etc. Time and days disappear, you tell your preferences, no more weekends, if you want 3 day off straight every weeks, you make it a condition in your file. With a search engine from key words of trades, or education courses, and others, the employer or reality will search, by areas on a map if he wants, what he needs, and the people may do the same with a necessary visualization of the employer profile and history, they'll have detailed or simplified access to the enterprise history of necessity toward needs and efficiency versus pollution values, exploitation values with resources needs, and evidently, where they fit in, and their efficiency at helping reality's goals.

The basis work time is used to give the neutrality line of indispensability. From that, if you stay inside the ways of the reality you can almost do anything and it will end-up as some added value, bad luck is the exception. The basis of our reality is the minimum indispensability people must have. If you don't accept this formula, then you're totally expendable, you play a game of pressures, and your place is not here. If the basis satisfies you and you want to program a game in your corner for years, or gain experience or train your way for as long as you want, go ahead, it is highly probable it will end up positive for reality. The basis includes some work you'll have to do, but it's not made for profit, it is made to reimburse the cost of reality's basis of functioning. Evidently, the goal and ideal is for people to want to do something, and if they're minimally competent, the reward is credits, not the contrary.

Most age limits for work won't exist anymore, you are not a slave that has a shift to do, or you don't work for the eventual goal of doing nothing, you do what you want and that's it. Credits in advance will be made available in function of history of reimbursement only, but the personal debt of people must not end up as profits to the reality; it must become neutral in value, you can get that without pressure and with minimal good working will. So credits in advance is available to everybody, to some extent, and the people that do nothing from bad luck are compensated (basis equivalent comfort with a little surplus, and more attention).

Now, we'll work harder at the beginning phase of the reality, that's logical, but we'll try to automatize and robotize as much as possible, and eventually the work need of the basis may get lower or the basis will get more comfortable. We'll see how people prefer things, it may be possible that the basis becomes almost everything and that most people simply accept to live their whole life from it, if you still have the means for creativity.

It's all a matter of getting those life point bottles (1 for reality, 1 for cultural societies (the one showing-up up front when you open your interface.) doing the same thing with different emphasizes) emptying and filling at a good rate, you can run faster, but don't enter the trap of underestimating relaxation, doing less intense work can free some thinking, you can increase the basis of comfort, open expensive psychiatric institutes everywhere, all kind of options are open, but the fundamental is that the bottle gets filled at a rate that won't stagnate the reality, in which case, there will be a revision to gain back efficiency at doing it. And the worst thing to do is demolish structures because of a lack of vision or understanding or consciousness, or remove advantages given to people.

So it is not because the bottle fills fast that it means we must spend on stupidities, the best you can do with a fast filling bottle is to spend it on more risky investments, or things that will end up positive in all kind of ways, attaining civilization goals too, never forget those, they got a progression bar, watch it, and always make things visual with a global and simple view, you wouldn't underestimate the importance of visuals; people must see the bottle of life points (credits) filling, make it pretty with effects, you'll have progress bars and dynamic numbers to show things too. Attaining some goals can stagnate a bottle filling; to gain, cumulate, and associate expertise and structures, some of those will be lifelong counterproductive things, some expertise will take 30 years to form, don't forget that, so don't throw yourself in a golden age too fast.

As long as the work needs are fulfilled and people are happy, we do what we want. Everything is centralized, if we need a good manager and different personnel we can quickly get results, then we give the manager a satisfying contract, as a simple ladder of pay, but nothing wrong if it's decided by a kind of global credits transfer structure A&D groups too (work like any other group), then he takes care of managing things and employees, he give titles according to pay, the money is always taken at the source and any anomaly will show in the financial record of his employees.

We'll want our most successful people to have access to the most attractive gifts too, no humility to be had there, pride is more like it, and people will know what they mean, no cheating. These achievement kind of bonuses will almost eliminate the need for trophies and presidential medals of honor and bravado. Some of the most worthy objects will only be available this way. An A&D group decides all this and it will help a good competition environment. Only imagination limits the extent of a list of gifts, but I'm not sure about gift reality so let's not exaggerate. Imagination that will now be unlocked free, in time, in knowledge, in judgment, and creators will have the biggest rewards for their work, whatever that is, but it will still be highly variable in function of priorities, needs, appreciation, and many other factors; we must not forget our notions of indispensability.

Successful creations or popular ones increases their specific ladder of pay, but we'll still transfer some credits to people who work with good intent even if they don't get the best of results.

So the creator is paid and provided what he needs for his project, from self-indebting, or from reality involvement (investing on stuff go through investment A&D, which is nothing, just parameters (I mean, reality through A&D make the means available, so you can only invest on debt)). Your project is accepted under these parameters, a channel to means of this quantity is open of this size, and once your creation is done, the value or enjoyment it or you provides will be adequately rewarded if any tangent of appreciation exist and is detected. You can get an augmentation if you're under pay, get credits on units sold, and in the situation of unique special creations you can give a few choices of nice gifts, removing of debt, basis increases, and with that comes the adequate ladder of credit transfer from gained expertise and appreciated abilities.

And don't forget your interdependence, you probably need more important creative people to create the tools you'll use for making entertainment, so if you don't want I devaluate entertainment creativity as not much, you'll have to accept that it is not worth more than any other creativity, minimally, even if you get a wrinkle from being tired of working, everybody do, and even if you kill yourself playing hockey, you are still not worth more credits than in most work structures.

You can still do jobs that will bring you 250 000$ CAN-U.S. equivalent a year for the hardest things to achieve or expertise to gain, that's over the basis with gifts, and you can't stash more than a year's salary, spend the money before the end of the year if you got a surplus, that's what Christmas is for, or you can give "leftovers" as a gift to the "community" too, the bottle is not your enemy you know... Once people gets old, or if they are unlucky, the basis is free of work; you won't have to be available for work 18 hours a week anymore.

No infinite stash for old days? What was that? Well, can we make something fair and worthy to complement your "buffer" stash? I believe so, just give an advantage over the basis whenever you stop working, be it in youth or as old. We could calculate your total "clear" credits made to date, take 1%, divide it in 12, and give it back every month over the basis while subtracting the amount to the original (as a simple calculation, all your cumulated credits, after the basis, of your life to date are 2 000 000 C. 1% of that = 20 000 C divided by 12 = 1666 C a month over the basis the first year. The next year, you remove permanently forever, 20 000 C from 2 million. You end-up with 1650 C a month. Then you subtract 19 800 for 1633 for the next year and so on).

These numbers probably don't fit, they are just an example of how to get a result, without little characters or counterproductive specialization, everybody can understand the formulae, no complex stashing of money, no interest rates, you can transfer all your credits you made in your life back to the reality and you still end-up with added value, whatever you ever do in your life over the basis, some goes back to you over the basis hassle free. It is easy to modify the formulae to calculate month value instead of years, so you can take a month vacation anytime with added value. The more you make credits through your life the better, the longer you do nothing the less credits over the basis. It is good for older people, while younger ones gain not much of an advantage.

Now, I may not be right in my things, as always, it is just an example, it could be done very differently, a percentage could be added somewhere for a more evident difference, or something could be made a variable, or some cultures could experiment variations, anyway, you understand the principle.

Just don't forget that it is a complement to your "buffer" stash, meaning if your best year of worth was 250 000$, you can have a "buffer" of that amount to play with all along your life, you can fill it and spend it 10 times if you want and you can end-up filling it one last time for your old days. And that can supplement your normal salary, meaning there are years where you'll actually be capable of spending 500 000$ in luxury if that's what you want, but the money come entirely from your work, no interests rates to amplify it.

And I'll add this note; basis credits should be made available at the day or week instead, not months, because the bigger the amount that lands in one shot in your hands, the higher the risk you'll regret misusing it, it is too easy to starve at the end of month, toughing until the first, too happy to skip making a party, embarking in a never ending wheel of never having enough while developing very bad habits. I've played that game a long time, except for me, the party was buying a game, and one was enough to end my months in misery. But things luckily fell into place when my computer became too old... I long for a serious heavy challenge, like X3 Terran conflict which should be very satisfying, with tons of mods, evidently, and don't tell me that you can make such games, and tons of other good games, while you can't make a computer systematization of reality, I see all the necessary skills there, missing is association and the availability of the goal, which I hope I can provide, but in this reality entertainment is more important and rewarding than making a bright future, just ask singers and hockey players, I should drop all this; my priorities are wrong.

This basis will be made out of critical service for a healthy population, we must keep in mind that people giving services will always be critically important, a lot of expertise too, but expertise or specialization doesn't mean much if it's not used. Now, for every use of a critical service an id check will be made, like for anything else dealing with credits, and if the amount surpasses the basis of the selected service category, it will be paid by the person. We should try to make it more comfortable with time, not squeeze it to discomfort, but the equilibrium point is where we stay efficient at reaching noble goals and having any services while population grows and put the basis to the test until you start building more efficiency value toward other goals. Evidently, it must always stay a basis, forget about gold or too much personalization, besides, there's an equilibrium to reach between exploitation of resources, space, pollution production, amount of population and basic service needs. Our reality will have to go through this logic, but we still have to be careful with our attitude when replacing or implementing something that has a big effect on lowering pollution, as an example, and not immediately see that positive effect as a compensation for a bad one, a natural tendency for species making an unconscious fixation on fairness, I mean, never lose your judgment, and never take a systematic decision under extreme emotions, particularly raw anger, just saying...

For now, we must provide comfortable necessary value for transport, food, health, lodging etc, then very slowly increase until an equilibrium is reached in the amount of population, space, exploitation of resources, pollution production and all the things that are limited, which must be controlled and distributed fairly. Also, the basis must not increase too much until we are a proven successful covering more than half of earth in space, since it's hard to know the weight in resources, pollution, etc, that it will have, logic says it should be more expensive for a few people than more, but I wouldn't bet on that, anyway it will develop along with cultural societies.

A precise number of hours make it so that the most paid end up giving the most valuable time, I like this, I think it makes a nice spiritual (spirit) transition, an added invisible value to our involved citizens, they don't do things only to get closer servicing and more wow stuff, but to be a part of something greater than themselves.

There is nothing to stop the reality or culture to "beat" the basis by sending impulsions of credits, and people can intervene and give impulsions of credit anywhere they want too, at any level they want, in fact there should never be some unused life points in the bottle, like a heart doesn't cumulate blood for more than a beat, and so we'll be better with a fast redirection algorithm concerning any leftover so they can be dumped on a place that immediately gives an effect, like infrastructure debts as awarded slots. As for the basis, its ways of reimbursement don't need people to feel bad for not make their hours, other options are available, but doing nothing grows the cost to others.

Apart from that, there is nothing to stop the reality, or culture, to increase the hours allocated to their basis, some may want to keep it at that and insufflate their basis, others may want to make basis "sprints" where it is double time basis, or when they wake up in the morning, people could even set their personal basis time over what the reality ask today, it will modify their credit accordingly, it can be used to reimburse old basis time debt, or you could even cumulate basis time, I see nothing wrong with these options. And there is nothing to stop people living a nomad life anywhere too, in a tent in the woods, they can temporarily eliminate their lodging needs, like for 6 months so nobody abuses, and increase one if their category of basis spending with something like 50% of original worth. Like people can change optimal basis values and they pay for the cost of the disturbance exponentially to 50% value upon elimination of need. People do that through their interface and it will be updated for next month, or week if it can work well. I was previously of the opinion that basis credits should not be permitted to cumulate, but since it would be very hard to become a millionaire that way, and in the name of less counterproductive complexity, and to let people have such an aspect to play with, then I change my opinion.

Identity checks will be associated to communications with the other reality, but it will not be forced among ourselves, even if you'll have to go through an ID check when appropriate without exaggeration. I mean, people know who you are or your age, why not? What are you scared of? A historical genetic fear of society? You don't trust people? That's ugly! Knowing who you're talking to should in fact be a fundamental right, at least among powerful people, so no fake profiles, but we won't go nuts, we want people to fell free to enable or disable stuff, and it will take a long time before we don't feel we have to watch out for cheaters everywhere, so we'll let people be as open or closed as we can, but the system still need to know who you are. Young people will have access to a restricted version of father reality internet (more secure, without imposed pub, without tradable goods we don't want or want to encourage the production of.).

Your personal file (profile) will contain many departments; education, your work exigencies, your employment record, your criminal record, your financial record, your medical record, to what insurance plan you're on to what credit plan you're in, your voting history, your dating corner etc. Evidently, you'll have all kind of restriction parameters, like a date or time or accessing parameters, but there are many services that will require access to different aspects of your file. You will have many options for your personal file, it may look like an internet site if you want, and the person looking at it can always change the appearance, even if it's not an argument in nothing except personal tastes.

You'll even eventually have a place in your personal file where you can write about appreciation strength of people you know or have just met, the main computer will take it in consideration, and following a personally selected choice of algorithms that will develop with the reality, the general computer will try to affect reality according to your wishes, and that can go far. As an example, some people will want to work their basis on simple work, particularly in youth, there can be a kind of work they prefer doing and the computer will take it into consideration, but they may meet someone along the way that they particularly like or that bring them motivation, then you can personally note that person on the fly as an hidden data that only your ID can unlock (forced hidden forever), and the computer will try to bring mutually appreciative people together more often when working at that job is the idea. This is the kind of thing you'll have with well developed algorithms, and some are personal choices, like apps, some are the choices of your society.

It all depend what program of association the person will want to put herself under, and the limitation both put to their personal file, you lock what you want, but if you want to plug yourself for live satellite positioning, you can, and your friends will be able to find you with a radar function. Parts of your file are locked-unlocked on the fly, you'll even have communication levels, green for take your time, yellow for as soon as possible and red for urgency. For the receiver, he can set the level of call or message he want to receive at any precise time; green is at your service, yellow is wait some time, red is better be serious. All options in your personal file will be clear, evident, and simple; you won't need to search the internet or a self-help book as a result of trying to enable or disable something.

As for the programs for people to associate, they will develop as the reality becomes successful, and there will be a big category of them that will concern love since one of our goals is a better implementation of it that what's been achieved until now, to which I'll give some merit; I don't know the quantity though. In the end, the more people will use those programs, the better they will develop, and matching people can become relatively easy with a relatively good success rate; at least less of a stumbling bet that you have in father reality and you won't have to spend credits for it, even indirectly, since communication will be free. And don't worry there is nothing to stop people meeting in bars or anywhere in the woods.

And you must not forget the value of laborious work or work nobody likes to do, this is a very big modifier of work value. What do you spend money for do you think? For things you like to do? Then why aren't you paying for work you like to do too? Strange eh? All those television people who sing how they would live the same perfect life all over...but I better not start that path, one thing's for sure I definitively wouldn't live the same life again, unless the second part is extraordinary. Doing my brains all over again, I'm sure I could mess up something along the way, and maybe I'm doing exactly that but it's not appropriate for my mind to judge the matter...I think. If you like your life so much, then sit down and watch it and learn. Me? It is my phantasm to watch the truth of history, and learn (it's like my secret dada, I'm not that much interested in history because Christianity played in it, but it really make me emotive to think I could watch the truth of it, at my rhythm, with some options left out; I don't wish to look at evil doing its things in unnecessary redundant details...) Personally that depends, I know my past crimes make me a bit emotive with regrets, but on the other hand I could as well grow fond of myself, so it's a tricky thing. I'd like a fast forward for when I'm in a disfavorable position though, or for when I sit for hours thinking, sure that I could travel the ongoing flow of life energy within my consciousness to go see what exactly I'm phantasizing or dreaming about, then get out of there and watch the face of the guy as he run to his desk to write in this English language about a land that he has no idea how it came into being, but not before taking a pose to do some masturbating (that sounds so weirdo and gross, who the hell this word?), do I have to watch this?

My guess, yes, my guess, I'm guess mastering and feeling it out all along, I don't know what I'm writing about, no credibility at all, no experience at no nothing except troubles, feeling intelligence man! So my guess is that emphasizing on fairness, true love and acting in a good manner in an environment where they have their say on everything directly, people will come to have a better idea of the human best path, they'll be comfortable and maybe after a few thousand years of wellbeing without all the logical wrongs, they will find greater true happiness as a mass. Who knows, for some cultural societies the basis principle may even develop in totality, people having all they need from the basis and still contribute, and rich people would feel super weird there, like the members of this reality are bizarre and weird and strange and creepy to me, scary kind of bizarre, like they are all unstable and ready to explode in a mess of ugliness anytime, I don't feel safe.

I did exaggerate a little, but many people only want to make a beautiful world like they want a beautiful home, not everybody is gardening for profits, some just like it, make things more beautiful or better, women tend to try to do that with fake tits (that's quite degrading actually) too, but it's not the same (was that a sexist joke???). There are justifications to like almost any job, or a big percentage, and when you do something you like, you want to do it money on no money, you even pay for doing most of the things you like because you are in a reality where there is someone to profit from anything. In the end, a good pay should be given to people that do things not many people like, or which implies lots of self-sacrifice. The worst way of dealing with money is what this reality does, where people get money from PMBBD pressures, or profiting from innocence, or competition, or hype.

Now, don't forget some things I describe will get modified, even after the simulation, A&D work will slowly steer things until they find their best way; you know that everything is always modifiable. But our reality doesn't exist without the computer "brain", it is the basis we are dependent from, like the head is dependent from the body basis form it took, this is a powerful advantage we'll use as much as we can. And leave me alone if you watched too many movies with evil computers, evil aliens and "lovely" vampires, no evil computers without evil people behind, if you discard the use of computers, discard humanity with it as it will have no reasons to exist. And that's what you'll have behind the central computer; some of the most worthy people, thousands of them continually making the job and life easier of millions upon millions of people, not necessarily directly.

Those people, many of which are ridiculously not appreciated by this reality, are the people that gave us almost everything we have as technological advancements today, they're the ones that gave us super movies, games of all kinds, applications of all kind, I wouldn't be writing this without them, the greatest people of our times are not your "loved" superstars, your "loved" professional sportsmen, or even your "loved" politicians, the ones you should praise are millions that do all kind of brain work, yes, brain work, they are learning all kind of languages, all kind of things, and whatever they are not the most physical, they are developing more humanly than all of you, ego "lovers".

So much in fact that an increasing lot of computer and program specialist don't even care hearing about this ego competitions of death, some prefer to die alone than even try this crap of a system and its well adapted women, love is not even a worthy thought for them, even if they won't explain why, this version of love is not worth the troubles, they prefer to live for a passion than to live this mess (hell), and not only them do.

The next time you go watch your "lovely" erotized superstar running under a rain of special effects, have a "prayer", if you remember how I see these, for the fundamental parts that permitted it all. Almost everybody, every professionals and scientists and publicists and entertainers, everybody use the tools such people permitted the existence of by learning those computer languages. But in this reality who does the selection "love"? The most ego people or the best manipulators, while the ones that do the greatest work do it for not much, often in basements as a passion because they like it, like many inventors of old; they don't need a fabulous pay and luxury as an encouragement, even if some will go crazy from being forgotten or ignored by this monster of a reality which often succeed at making them evil in the end with all its PMBBD pressures.

I personally learned assembly language, it's the fundamental language of transistor arrangements, all programming languages are extrapolation of this to make it less of a chore, transforming it from computer to human, because writing a complex instruction set in assembler can take years, even if it ends up as the smallest program possible and the fastest one; assembler is like talking to chips in your computer in their language, chips which contain arrangements of 2 states transistors forming logic doors, the "or" "and" "add" "if" "not" "crash" etc, everything with a chip work from that. But my point was that it is possible that someday we will have to change the basic architecture of computers, so we should cherish those people who learn and use and develop all those languages, because it will be a big 20 years of work, a creativity step this reality may never be able to take, condemned to its own limitations for profiting. I'm sure there are possibilities that could multiply the power of computers like crazy, but they may be impossible to develop in this limited competitive environment that will only see new architectures as the mixing of form of the same basic structure, I'm sure there are technologies that are not presently developed because they could send half, even more, computer parts industries to shut down, which is a condemnation.
But don't worry about that, we can do everything we need from what currently exists, we can probably have the power for anything we'll ever need, and it may be possible that no other architectures are possible too, still, we will never have enough computing power, that's why we'll put means to develop any data crunching idea to its full extent. Computers are a tool but don't forget the body is dependent from its brain, fuck-up the brain you'll have grave problems; you can still get a body to live with a little incompetent brain, but you'll miss greater functions and powers. So fundamental changes must be done by an evident majority, and the system will have to be fractioned as disconnect-connect parts all the way to the whole thing, to follow the principle that we can take a basis and grow something different from it, and we'll prefer to replace, update or repair a part, not the whole thing, unless it got to be changed whole, in which case you're still better doing things incrementally if you can.

Now, don't go insane over my visualization of things, it's just a way to say that we must last and keep our systematization and knowledge, you know the reality is not a human lasting 100 years, it is a civilization lasting an infinity of time, so we are better having disconnect-connect capacity for security and other reasons. We'll even want to be able to take a backup and make an interstellar vessel work from it, transferring the hardest things to do; we cannot load the earth in an interstellar vessel, but we can carry the recipe to grow a new civilization on another planet to success without having to go through hell, isn't it nice? And the system must be the whole thing, the most complete form, with all its compressed memory, we must bring as much of our history that way.

I'm out of my subject but I'll add that we don't have to carry the lies of history, we can make that choice since PMBBD invalidate true history, that's the power those manipulators gave us, remaking history more to our tastes, lucky we'll have to mention we inspire ourselves from actual "facts"...taken from the bible? Pfff, it will be an ugly story if we do that, in fact that's an horror I would gladly leave behind...just forget...but know...it does...exists. We're stuck with this, aren't we? We could give then such a lesson all religions and sects on earth lose hope of enslaving people through manipulation ever again. The problem I'm trying to tackle here is the lingering bad effect of historical lies, i understand that on earth we can tolerate a lot more and the planet have to live with its truth, but as a different reality seeking independence, risking it all, do we need this shit to influence us at our most difficult step? I say not if it's voted as such, known to be, so we're not at a loss when faced with it. Like a bullshit tainted category of history, with the inside of a church as the interface, just a suggestion... Maybe not, we'd have to dump a lot of stuff in there, because those with the mentality to successfully gain control of things will never tell the truth of it as a competitive advantage. We still must absolutely carry the general true story of our old history though, whatever it was full of lies, we just leave lies and PMBBD behind, replaced with a mention that it is desecrated history from PMBBD use, or probabilities or legends to manipulate people to a mentality, stuff inspired from some events that we're not sure happened, and so it is open to interpretation, write your suggestion, because that's all we have; an probable story, or a half true one on hype.

Everything will be made with parallel redundancy with independent power sources and programming in mind. Even if there may be attacks, they will profit nobody, if you hate our ways enough to dream of crashing our things, you'll have to crash two independent systems doing the same thing in parallel and programmed differently, and when we'll be successful reality, we'll add a third one which will be top new tech.

And that includes everything, they will be functioning backups, you crash one, the other take over without affecting reality (in ideal theory, wasting a few days in your life work may be tolerable in the event, and ultimate emergency plans will be developed to keep fundamentals running, you don't stop growing food because there is a problem with credits, you trust reality to repair things as best as it can, so you continue doing your part of running things too. But the reality will always work on many facets of the system continually, so the total back-up thing is a goal but more as developing steps of technology, while everything will be composed of parts too, that way a facet or part can be changed instead of the whole thing, furthermore, the back-up may not be perfect, it may be slower to update or non-critical features may be temporarily affected).

So we'll need the main system, a second system with different data stashing structure, and eventually a third pure memory of "alien" form, like superman's crystals, it can be slow or hard to produce or modify or stash data or read, but it must be indestructible and impervious to data corruption. I'll add that old data systems are not recycled; they are stashed in a cool dry place and maintained for restart capability, you don't go cheap there, they are the most valuable piece of museum shit you can lay your hands on, and if things fail, you'll have data recovery options better than broken tablets, and if things really go bad gorilla (or chimpanzee) level, then the structuring of memory can later be recuperated.

As an extrapolated sideline concerning "Lift-Off", I could say that such a scenario of data stashing for eventual recovery could be a possibility for old "gods" too, it may be possible they left something like this for some steps in life development, at some logical point we'll have to go to, the moon? Pluto would make more sense, probably nothing, but don't be surprised if first alien contact is yourself... It's just that I don't think old gods, from the look of things not around anymore, would have visited us and made themselves that big only to leave nothing behind, only drawings more akin to dreaming than anything else, so either those stories are all wrong, or we'll soon have news of them (him, her, it, them, whatever) one way or the other, since the critical moment would be at the space expansion step. The rapport being that their true historic data would be better stashed in space for future people that have the right attitude to keep its integrity, you wouldn't leave that on earth, ego people would make a pile of PMBBD from it, or natural elements would destroy it.

What about commodity markets? I don't know, just put them somewhere...there, a drain! Under this reality's form, they are worse than banks, and that's kind of a grave affirmation from me, but it's a system that do steal more money than banks, and like them they are mostly means for some to steal other people's money, enlarging the difference between "classes"; they are a vast source of unfairness.

I removed the following page in my last revision, because I thought I was too hard with bankers, but my bank pissed me off to rage lately so it's back online, and now no banker get near me without and explosive crush! You made your point, I make mine, and fuck the ones who do the job because they're benevolent; you fail! Another evil institution that put its dirty paws on my love too, that I lost thanks to Christianity for the best spiritual aspect she could find in hell, and she ended up working for a bank, the only job she could find in hell...

Politicians sometimes try to do things, but most banks are criminal institutions, and people should have the right, in my dreams, and since good is supposed to have the right to fight bad, or bad can always compete bad, a win-win situation, except for the victim, to attack the unfair financial institution; "stealing" the mass thieves if they can. If they're lucky they'll get away with a few millions and 10 years of prison, and next, the bank will "need" more money to build thicker coffers and buy officers and surveillance systems to protect the bank. And don't tell me people put their money in the bank and they're the ones that will pay the price, I know, me too I sometimes have 100$ in my account, we are all part of the system, condemned to it.

But we're supposed to always have the choice no? If the foundation is a cheat, then people will eventually not care cheating, and eventually more people don't care about anything except keeping the image and the cheat gets bigger more complex and extended, cynicism increases, until the cheat crashes itself in illogism and evil, while bankers are hidden somewhere in think big luxury homes or bunkers (same as), meeting with governments and deciding things like who should pay more, who is evil and war and all.

Next no bets except in a direct way, what is most important to people should never be used for betting, and this concerns the whole life energy circulation mechanism, if only to make it simpler...You want to bet you do it personal, or as games. If there is no evident transformation done to a goods, form or movement, then it will be illegal point, and that include the whole fucking twisted evil housing or residential or building market; you buy a building to make it better or care for it or reap a rent or live in it, but not to immediately sell it based on market fluctuations so you can make a quick 50,000$, supposing there's not some shady crap going on that made it so you wanted to buy it in the first place.

Commercial centers will be used by most to sell actual stuff, and those, as I'll explain later, will be fantastic, we'll glorify centralization adequately, not to exploit people with more efficiency, but to provide the best of cultural societies, and so all what serves reality as a whole will have to inspire awe. We'll de-emphasize spreading of stores everywhere too; you can easily eliminate half stores and "boutiques" laying everywhere and spreading cities, and no problem with external areas, just a few less and more of an emphasis on utility stores or cultural and historical emphasis; no need for more than that with a good transportation system, and sorry for those who like to stroll through a Christmas tree. When you'll want something in the life reality, you'll search it hassle free and different sources and stores will be exposed with prices, and the only resources (not goods) stasher will be the reality.

Reality will mine (can be anything) like any other contract concerning itself versus its cultural societies (reality seeks neutral value, but anything that is a drain on cultural societies from the need of reality can be seen as natural expense of it, I mean a society buying a resource that's involved in the production of something that reality wants to distribute freely will do it at reality's expenses (cultural societies can do it at a different level too). Reality pays workers to get resources wherever they are, but it will prefer high specialty, so an exception will be made for cultural societies that mine and transform on the spot, all what uses their resource in majority and that need to be produced massively, it can be seen as the turning point in the success of a society, so some kind of nice long term bonus could reward well these kind of efforts).

So resources will be seen as a whole and priced in function of need, usefulness, quantity etc, through the reality balance, which is composed of top decision takers concerning limited basic resources, but I'll talk more about that later. For now, I'll say that we will mine and grow stuff, at the tons, but maybe less in a massive exploitation way, and we will try to use what "nature" has to provide first. In Québec, we exploit "naturally" maple syrup, we don't destroy everything else for it (usually); we're inside the forest, do we want to raze the place to make plantations and try to produce trillions of tons of it like raisin wine? Or do we prefer to make it a specialty emphasis that is rooted culturally?

If gold can be replaced in most technologies, then it must be expended, there is no use mining and stashing gold; make something with it, diamonds too (we can make better synthetic ones for tech), and all those luxury things too. For a lot of time it may not be necessary to mine these things like Canadians, we're not in medieval times, what do you want to buy with that? Your passage to heaven? The way this reality uses this stuff I'm not far from qualifying it as worthless junk! What do you want to do with it? Fill a gigantic heavily protected garbage can? Make an interstellar vessel out of gold and jewels? A palace? A highway through hell? Maybe, it's so heavy to carry around and people run after it so much you're as well roll on it. I don't see no gold nowhere in my apartment or life, one hell of a necessity, very valuable, what's all the fuss all about? To waste it incrusting it in metal money, then say we "consume" a ton of gold a year just for the fun of wasting it in tinfoil? And the argument that gold connects better is invalid too, you don't need gold on plugs, if you didn't have gold you'd do without it not even thinking your plugs can't plug good without it! You'd say your plug is inadequate instead, and you'd make better ones.

Since people easily create strong attachment to these precious things, they care for them, then you don't need expensive security and batiments all over the place; people should be the security. So for as long as gold and jewels is not a critical necessity in technology, we'll put more in the hands of people as jewelry. Design specifications will be made by anybody, you'll have it on computers as modeling, and all items that have lost signification to someone will be stored for eventual recycling if it saves transport and exploitation of new gold, the model is always kept so it can be recreated if wanted, and I see nothing wrong if a lot of museums precious stuff becomes digitalized since I can't grab at it anyways...could be fake...

Evidently, all that will devaluate those still precious, because they are rare, metals and gems. More people will wear some and that will lower plastic production and absolute garbage.

When you stash a resource without using it, you manipulate and contort its true value, the value of something is in the uses it has, or when you use something you give it value if you prefer. The use of luxury stones and metals for now is for people to wear them, not make stashes or eternal garments to be protected with fantastically expensive security. I believe, even if there will be some losses, we'll "consume" less this way with the advantage of having far less people making an expensive counterproductive paranoia about it. Anyway, we can skip gold dreaming for some time.

Apart from that, we have to start from current way of things, which means a planet covered by its systems and installations, so we'll hope the help will not take the form of pointing at the worst hazardous areas and stuff around, as a way for father to clean-up his mess; you don't start a new reality in a nuclear wasteland, or take the responsibility of one, so if Russia give us Chernobyl we won't take it...As an extreme example, not that I think good people would want to do that, in fact a lot of my sarcastic and ironic humor exaggerates the truth of my opinions, so don't take it badly if you fit a little, it's mainly for people who exaggerate, they reap my exaggerations. But I should still be careful, I already have 0 friends, I wouldn't want to go too much in the red with that... So seriously an profoundly I'm pissed-off for life as I'm pissed-off for humanity, nobody is happy here, only evil. It's all a whole to me, even if individuality is critical, I just believe we must do a lot better, for all what life and our ancestors went through, for all those cells that die in a day to permit my existence, so I want and I fear, but pity hasn't worked for me, and from what I see of the people, pity is as temporary as it should be, like pain, but in a place that's so easy to get wrong in hell that you're as well not open that door in hell, those who do are probably manipulators...

We'll filter out what's inappropriate anyway, watchful of all the evil behinds that may try to infiltrate, and we'll slowly develop our own things too. We'll eventually want to surpass current level of diversity and capacity in most things, even if this reality exploited almost all imaginative diversity in existence for it... So we will make all kind of dishwashers, cars, clothes, things and entertainment while thinking adequate diversity. Inadequacy may look like electronic gadget diversity using rare resources, this is wrong, the same for those who squarely waste resources for specialized gadgetry that don't even last 10 years. Adequacy may look like wine or food diversity which should be vast because the means are available, we don't want that to be limited because of publicized taste limitations or manipulation until indoctrination. We'll make things that last far longer, or need less resources, pollute less, make less noise etc.

Diversity in life and things is very important; it doesn't make the world more complex, only more personal, pretty, individualistic (is society the work of an individual god? Or an association of many individual people working for a common goal (not god or gold, GOAL)? So it will be part of our philosophy not to produce shitty stuff that end in the garbage fast. We want a healthy regenerative land, if alternatives to plastic can be developed we'll immediately start producing and replacing things with it, but it will have to be seen as a whole, not only some scientifically proven facets. Meaning new chemical or "natural" molecules will have to be charted, listed and tested, and we must not raze vast expanses of wild life for more plantations of engineered production. The new product must not "evaporate", and a bacteria stuffing itself with plastic is not the final step of it, you'll have to watch for more levels of interrelated communication systems, the shit of the bacteria, it's inside changes etc, it may produce an hydrogenated bizarre version of a good thing that the industrialist very trustable man dreaming of profit will throw around as scientific proof that it "save" the environment while it is poisoning it somewhere else, or the material hardens and break under the sun fast enough that you need more energy recycling and more production from decomposition. And it's not because a thing decompose itself faster that it means it is good for life, they may contain new "pure" or bioengineered molecules (?) that could eventually become a far worst problem in the future since PMBBD will push our mind to extrapolate that we can throw it anywhere, and it's good since it disappears, and stuff that disappear can't be bad (I just wanted to suggest that stupidity is always around, but I'm okay...). Molecules, any new molecule, interacting with life must be tested for many years in an enclosed ecosystem to have an idea, and only an idea if it is not terribly affecting to some critical life parts or functions.

Everybody who say their product decompose or recycle will have to show all facets of their claims, plastic recycle in all kind of ways, no doubt about it, but what are the related effect and needs of the recycling? As for things that decompose in the ground, watch those industrialist, they pass their time hiding stuff underground, lying and manipulating, they want to sell, they pay a lot for publicity, they want to exploit more, produce more, they'll say everything is clean and apply a green sticker on the front door but the back door is locked, where trucks leave at night on a mission.

There are industries that make real efforts even if they produce some toxic stuff, and they must be rewarded big for their effort because advancements in such matter is tremendously valuable, but their effort must contain the truth, no more industrialist secrets. Lie and your reputation is made, you are out of business and I'm kind of fair, if I give a big reward for efforts made in truth, I give a big punition to bullshit users. So people making themselves a name saying their cell phone disappear in the environment got their head on the log; things don't disappear without leaving traces, and since nobody seems capable of finding the secret magic, I'll tell you how to do it; anybody that make non pollution or disappearance claims will have to prove it in a closed simulation aquarium, your cell phone is better disappear in there, and there is better not sip out toxic stuff at the bottom or the ax will fall, stand by your claims proportionally to the effect they can have.

You take the content of the aquarium and watch what's in it, including the inside of bacteria, without blasting everything to carbon evidently, or taking it up your big nose... There are bacteria that do a perfect job with many toxins, other not, and you still got to be careful with your final knowledge about any living thing; did I already talk about the big bacterial brain that surpasses humanity's own? Not that I'm proving something with my quick methodologies, but that simple test can be used for any new "environmental friendly" or transformed or recycled stuff. I'll reward efforts made even if toxic stuff is found, I know it is a big ideal, but false publicity gets me moody. And I'll want to know what are these toxic molecules, I don't want something worse than mercury getting eaten by my animals, we almost lost the beluga here because of such poisons. And life include plants, I don't want to spice my steak with something grown over a toxic dump with a critical add-on to the effect that the thing is supposed to prevent cancer; I'll choke on a pack of cigarettes for some truth toxins instead, like those carrots that taste of petroleum and that give me the shakes every times I eat one, good Canadian carrot, grown in bitumen sands, I wouldn't dare make wine with that, I could end-up with a new psychedelic parkinson drug...for Stuff.

Many molecules are good for object building too, or temporary healing not used while making babies, we can do a lot if we limit production pollution. So, while never forgetting that garbage is a resource, if we can dump those problematic garbage and pollutants in places that won't affect life, like a multi kilometers very deep past water circulation and few kilometers large straight hole where self-weight pressure crush garbage by itself, we'd be rid of garbage interactions with life we cannot deal with, and maybe we could even recuperate worthy gasses and liquids from it; if scientists can make a mega tank to catch a cosmic ray, then we can make one as big for less to experience pressure dumps, or recipes of garbage that you mix or let repose or freeze to make usable matter out of it. We can make holes as big as cities to get at gold? Then we can make deep cylinders as the end final part of a mining operation concerning garbage. I think a culture could make a specialty of it, because I know some place have a good attitude on the matter, if their life was made safer and better with a basis and equipment then there is sure no shame there, but that's still a special one for as long as automation is not advanced, so we'll need good science to know the best way to do it.

But this is not a final solution, it is a temporary possibility to explore while we learn to recycle everything with more efficiency; we just can't attain all our goals at the start of the new reality; that would be fantastic eh? But we can't, and such dumps, without saying it's genial, will permit science to explore a new possibility; what if the material in there could form some kind of stuff that could be recycled almost as a resource? Some gas? Heat? Or making things decomposable with some residual chemicals gotten from our shit? We can and we must experiment such things as it may be necessary for space travel where things must work at a massive scale and as simple as possible; the less tubing, piping, wiring, complexity and machinery, the better. Apart from less breakdowns and more lasting time, it goes with the philosophy of the reality, the reality must not be so complex people pass too much time learning and understanding it, we want versatile people that can grow specialties at "beyond" level in many spheres if they want, we don't want understanding the reality to be our specialty.

The problem right now is that big companies have separated everything for profits, they don't see things as a whole, they sell as much as they can and don't include garbage in the price of their items; garbage is seen as a financial problem. Producing something is not eternal so many even use that as a production philosophy (like lights that last a few months), as they are not responsible for the garbage.

A lot of rich people are like that, they don't really care, they only listen to the market, it's your problem; their responsibility is to make money and you clean behind at minimum salary. We'll see things as a whole, because our reality will permit it, even if it won't be easy at first, particularly since the other reality will have a lot of things to make us jealous, including entertainment. It will be a long time before we can surpass all that, but we'll have example of success on different facets to put it to shame right away, and they will be the ones who'll end up envious in the long run.

Science and expertise in our reality will follow the same ideals as the reality, no choice as they're in it, they will be forced to the global vision from the basis we give people in youth, and that will automatically de-emphasize many of their bad facets. There will still be some incompetence, but more like around 10% instead of 30%, and they will truly be worth the highest respect as a profession or specialty without pressure; they will have found their place, we will admire them because we'll have no reasons not to, they will make the reality philosophy come true, with all what it implies, as simple as that, whatever they want it or not. If we believe we can colonize another planet, we won't do it without science and experts, and don't worry, such a project transcend all expertise, the rewards affect all civilization, the man doing the most basic job will have every reasons to be proud, only profiteers won't.

For now, we can't trust industrialists or the rich and the scientists working for them to really act in the best manner. And forget about what you see on television and internet with a rented or fake scientist for some effect, like they do by stamping recycling stickers everywhere because some guy succeeded at recycling it, like all of a sudden everything becomes green and smart and biological and natural, all you need is to pay a saint scientist to apply a "It's scientifical green" sticker to start making profits.

The country competition will do that, most industrial and political leaders will compete using expensive PMBBD to paint themselves the greenest face of change to prove they are saints that have or had the recipe to save the world. The problem, as always, will end up on the shoulders of the lower people that didn't buy their green stuff and made the effort to change and be smarter while they are always the first to do it or start shouting, like me over here...

Let's talk petroleum! Petroleum is not evil! Ask BP! It is a limited resource that got a best use, the same for plastic. Petroleum alone, unless we're not careful, is not blood from hell, there is petroleum everywhere, even my carrots sometimes taste petroleum! Mmmm, we must see it globally, petroleum is mixed, in its different transformation phases, with hundreds chemical molecules, a lot from purified and transformed petroleum itself, and when you see molecules like I do, as trucks exchanging information everywhere the molecules go, they interact and transform with many other natural molecules until the result is carried through life which may or may not adapt to it. So I'm more scared of chemicals thrown about by people without consciousness, and those can be medical pharmaceuticals, paint, preservatives and many more including your beauty cream; you wouldn't dare underestimate the importance of image, and these creams have become so powerful that not only they make you younger and give you the voice of a little girl, not only they make you thinner and give you an orgasm, but you wake up in the morning with your lipstick on and a full hairdo.

Next products full of petroleum derivatives are all the chemical disinfectants our cleanliness is dependent from, the stuff we need to clean our dirty mouth too, to exterminate all those microbes infecting our sanitized and perfect life, satisfying our pub enforced for profit collective paranoia and our lack of self-consciousness development efforts, not our job, proven through our pub dependent actions and ego admiration...

Sorry, what I wanted to say was that even if you totally stopped transforming petroleum to useable products, you would not change the momentum of chemical production, you'd have to, believe it or not, stop everything, since the chemicals are in life now, and they will have to go through it one way or the other, which may take many hundred years. We have to invent, study and choose the best molecules, since we always have the choice of many of them, some better in some facets, some worse, then start to use them slowly, so we can react to their effect on life.

You can do everything if you seek the best way of things and you're careful, yes you'll pollute, yes you'll affect life, read that over, but when a mistake is discovered you'll be able to react, the momentum will be controlled and won't overwhelm life, it will slowly heal or tolerate or adapt, if there is not too much, over time, we almost lost the ozone by not caring, no proof it has ever healed, that it didn't just thin all over, the same for the oceans that we loaded with mercury, and now plastic decomposition molecules and nuclear wastes, there are many examples. It's like putting your hand in a too hot place, it burns, you remove it and it will heal, or if it is "just" hot, you can tolerate it and after a long time you'll create a protection naturally, but if you create an explosion of chemicals, or a burning hell, life won't take it, and time is relative when you're talking life, the explosion start can take a hundred years or more. In the end, the universal problem is profiting and not caring, those are the true destroyers, not chemicals or petroleum.

For now if this reality wanted to do something right, it could simply stop it's eternal and infinite growth philosophy, or asphalt spreading, or plastic containers overproduction, or any of many such examples. But it will not do it, and for what reasons? Profit from eternal and invincible structures run by godly gangs and their shareholders, and their markets. Some even protect their operating ability all the way to their tomb, to be seen as the ones that made it all possible, so hot that humanity is in troubles from missing the indispensability they created for themselves. That sounds so selfish, but some will even go away to spend their millions only to come back as saviors!

I think our philosophy will be different, we'll do things to attain better ideals and we'll end up better living and happier at it. As an example, a flower city (more on that later) will have glass recycling and transformation centers, for windows and for liquids which will come to the city in cisterns, bottled there, under any format, circulated, then pressure cleaned or recycled. (In a flower city, you don't need a car to get most what you buy through your basis computer, it appears in your apartment, kind of, a flower city is a machine-life hybrid and an example of what is true change, and an example of the way to go to succeed at reaching other stars).

Let's talk sex! Don't try to associate a flower to sex, sex people try to make sexual associations with anything possible, anything, anything, anything that have a length is a dick to them anything that got a hole means fucking to them, and a flower got nothing of these and they still see it as a sex thing, such people are twisting everything that make sense and they're laughing at the scrap they're making. As for the flower power thing, it is no better, a flower is just a beautiful thing of life, it attracts attention; the attention of life with color and smell and beauty, and guess what? It reproduces, like every fucking living thing! And like every living thing, there are ugly and stinking ones, and I'll like any flower I want without having an afterthought of stupid condemning associations to it, no flower mean I'm a homosexual or that I'm respectful of dead military people, and that applies to colors too.

That applies to sexist systematizations and infrastructures, some people are so sex insane that they are ready to destroy the whole planet for their sexist competition. But yes, if there are to be relations I'm as well take the lead. The only sex vision that would work here would be the ego ideology that fucked-up mother earth take the form of a father reality to make a baby, ok? Beware those who will want to contort my work transforming my vision to sex competition, imagine the horror! The ultimate mistake, hell incredible! A patriarch father reality vs a matriarch mother reality, because I made a flower, and flowers are girl things! Worse! I made a city with a hole, while the other reality made cities with penises! Wow, let's fuck! All is missing is Monarchy and Catholicism to get in on it and pervert all my work! The ideal is an eventual replacement of this reality, not a moving sexism battle line for still more war! I stand for love, so you got to have class, you got to be clean, and cute preferably too, you got to seduce mother earth here, so a flower won't be superflu too.

Finally, the life reality is as much a physical way of managing the earth, what we do with the physical world, as much as a mental attitude thing too; the total. A moron could reduce it to ant city, but again you see it as a sex thing; the vision is that of an interstellar vessel landing on earth as a city, then spreading itself as a flower. But we're on earth and it is made as an experiment on cement, and because of all the other significations, I visualize its surface design as a flower, thanks. But it fits! Yeah so? I bet you fit all kind of things up your ass too with this philosophy! Moron...

But yeah, we stand for love around here, we'll make of love a big thing, our reality will be as much about love as it will be about life, and a flower city has many connection with our love philosophy. At the limit I'll concede that you're almost forced to make sexual connections with some things, since people will make these associations one way or the other. Like if people decide to expand on the flower city principle, some flowers made with holes and big underground complexes, and geometrical cities with high rises in the middle, that's just sexual, even a little perverse, and lovely too, I tell you, everything is just perfect, so maybe that's exactly how it should be too, since I'm a sexual person too. I like the concept, but the true place of love is with people, and i'm not an amateur of environments that encourage division, competition, bitching, misunderstanding, a fertile grounds to develop all kind of bad personality traits, but again for extremists and those who only understand the way they like it, that there is a gigantic difference between having an individual apartment and bunking it all together friends forever like a bunch of sardines, except for emergencies. So no sexist city full of guys or girls, ok?

That was important, but I was saying that we may end-up with almost no plastic bottle in our reality, and we'll try to do the same with a lot of containers, even if they're heavier or more fragile. Our transportation system is not mainly based on burning fuel at the ton, we'll have electric trains connecting most bubbles (more later), we'll have ships, we may even make our (or modify) roadways for electric cars. We won't have much use for trucks except for more remote places in which scenario you'll probably move things bulk. The fantastic armada of them needed by this reality exists a lot because the reality is made for it from past philosophies, for profits and development a lot.

So there will be no more money production, CD's, and a lot gadgets production will stop, atomic reactor building will be highly limited, new cities will be built 3D without a mess of communication devices. There are many more things we'll do differently, globally, because our philosophy won't be ego competition and production where there is no need to, including subjective artistic pub. And in the end, to top it off, everybody will be globally far safer, more comfortable, independent, happy and a lot more while mother earth thrives and we make emptiness tolerable (in both meanings).

We'll need people to start the new reality, we will choose from the other reality first, but eventually we'll want to grow our people ourselves. So we'll need schools. One thing that is important is socialization when you're young, in fact, the younger you are, the more it takes, and the contrary for older people, the more adult you become the less you're supposed to need, and I said need. But in a classroom in silence most of the time you don't get much of that, you get an observation consensus of a necessary order of things to be accepted to grow, even if it's hard to resist breaking the consensus for some; for socialization. We call that listening to authority. That's the best way to do things while learning the basis of their reality so they'll eventually be able to stroll in it unconsciously, but that's for little unconscious, and it helps in the development of it too.

You understand that in a life reality, the value of people is geared toward the advancement of life, which includes civilization goals, which I'll give the credit that a lot of people try to do, I compare a lot this reality to hell, and I talk ideology, but it's not like I think people are blatantly evil, and that they should be dipped in a lake of fire for Lucifer's lunch, we're just stupid, incompetent, unconscious, ignorant, lacking, lost, frustrated, and often misguided, but the tools are still there, that's why these justifications are becoming thin. But down to earth level, helping life and love will be more valuable, and that includes helping each other. Learning institutions will have to teach better adequacy in human contacts, how to care for the most sensitive and emotive in a better way than what this reality achieved, where the more sensitive or emphatic reap the most difficulties, and not in a gay way, in an understanding and options way.

Now, children are not supposed to play alone and they won't in our reality, so if you need, there will be places where you can leave your baby or young child for 9 hours 5 days a "week" in a learning environment, and when they'll be older, there will be schools to do it. Around 14 the emphasis will switch on independence, individuality and personal willpower; the learning institution will try to stop controlling the time of its students in academic presence. That won't be very hard since computers will replace a lot of the work of teachers. Computers are like calculators; it's good to have mathematicians, but what is still better is for everybody to have their personal mathematicians in their pockets, giving them the exact formulae they need very quickly, even if mathematical expertise is still very important to have. Computers are such a powerful evolutionary tool; just infinitively more versatile and powerful.

What we'll still need is to keep pushing a structure of socialization, physical and mental health while they are starting to develop independence and specify preferences in their learning. Along with learning fundamental "brain" stuff, we'll "enforce" sports, cooking, nature, entertainment, socialization activities and more, all categorized by age. You'll even learn habits that will persist through years of school, like stretching, growing things and hunting wild life, preparing and cooking it, all those local herbs mushes and little fruits, you'll learn about them too, and yes you'll fill some buckets of them. As I already said, all these activities will be categorized by age and repeated often enough to develop hands and mind diversity of abilities for future personal choice of specialization while having a global basic ease at doing anything. The body and the mind are condemned together, such activities in youth help the mind develop more completely, be more sure of itself, giving it more liberty, less limitations. Once the general basis is obtained, you can pass 15 years of ultra-precise specialization if you want, but those diverse activities will still bring positive things to your life. And they can be to drive vehicules too; here's a basic example of what I mean, just limited to motorized stuff, while not forgetting that age is an around thing.

12- Lawnmower driving

14- VTT (3-4 wheels, skidoo and small boats) driving.

16- Car driving, small and farm machinery (tractors and things (chainsaws and potato machines)

18- Machinery, industrial tools, small trucks.

19- Bigger boats and small planes driving.

That was an example of things we'll consider as useful to put our hands on, like life saving and healing knowledge too, guns and ammo he too, from small firearms in youth to heavy artillery around 18, yes sir, all kind of activities and we'll mix the whole in a learning environment through the use of technology. We'll implicate young people in all kind of low level work activities that are useful too; all that to develop a basic physical ability diversity and intelligence.

You understand that the difference here is to make the most versatile and complete independent people as a basis, not arrange them so they can have an "education" or a job to fit in. We want people that have learning versatility as a skill, and even if they forget a lot of what they did as activities, the goal is to create mind and body plasticity, and having lots of activities as well as academic learning is the key to this, but repetition is a big factor too.

We'll want a lot of diverse learning activities of all levels, like a course that could be made of a few long term activities every years depending on age. As an example, you ask them to describe a complex thing made of what they are learning, the thing can be very complex with all kind of possibilities, like a game, but the goal is not to win, the goal is to simply write about the same thing every years, 10 pages the first year, 20 the second, 30 and so on while the thing cannot be described precisely. You can have many such things, and you can add projects like asking to draw and write about a city every years, write about your imagination every year, write about the future every year, about family, there are tons of subjects, and those things will be infinitively more valuable to people than a cold exam of precision that everybody must answer the same, even if they are critical too.

People will want to preserve these things, they will reflect themselves a lot more in them than a list of numbers, and many will better see the path of their heart. And you don't have to judge all of these things except at the effort level involved, I'd even prefer them a secret wheel where they gain back their work a few years later, deciding themselves what to do with it, who they'll want to show it to; in such a scenario you don't give them a paper at school, but a computer file they receive at home. Now, you don't need to make of all positive variations of learning a reality wide thing, you got cultures that can try their own things, as long as they stay within the reality's fundamental ways.

Every successful yearly basis acquisition will be rewarded appropriately, but we must not forget that even if we work toward making things fair, and compensate bad luck, we know some people are just born stupid or imbecile, sometime both, it's something that look bad as an aspect of evolution, but that's necessary. We can make their live better or easier, anyway we'll do our best and that means judgment first; we can spend millions to transform a chimpanzee into a genius, but we have other priorities. Yet, as the reality grows, there will be more and more ways for less lucky people to be more comfortable or feel more useful. For now, if you're a loner, you can ask for compassion in your personal file, maybe you'll raise the millions.

I set the line at the basis; if people cannot spring from that, too bad, you can just sit down and relax, enjoy the view, you may not be the one to be the most successful at fulfilling the love ideal either, but you may gain more than most through friendship, socialization, affection, communication, writings, everybody has a better way, and there's a better way for everything, a better or truer reason too. When we can we'll better develop specializations more appropriate to more limited people. Making everybody useful is important, it can even become a dangerously powerful tool on a motivated population that really wants to build things for good, even making itself indispensable to the story, and you know I don't mean dependent; like ego vs. individuality, there's a difference...

At around 18 you'll reach independence in choosing your education path, everything integrated in your personal file. From 14 to 18, it will be a transition coming from the judgment of the parents and the teachers, the number of courses successfully taken without (that word make me laugh "without") much help from teachers dictates the success of that transition.

That's somewhat my vision, but we must not forget that technology has its limits, and people have preferences, so there will be "classic" learning institutions. We'll have to study the possibility of integrating our learning ways with our socialization places too, depending if it is culture related or reality related. As an example, older students on their independence track may go pass their exams near commercial centers superstructure where there will be all kind of teachers, available to answer questions and correct exams. Each could have a small (around 20 students) comfortable place of work, while having the liberty to stroll about with their basis computer, enable satellite positioning for students to find them. There may be a few such options to explore, and cultural societies may specialize in a specific teaching strategies. We'll want a lot of diversity in learning institutions anyways, many choices both for parents as well as students.

The computer part will be made of filmed teachers, animation, games, etc. As an excellent example of how we'll want computers integrated in learning, you can look at the abracadabra program (A Balanced Reading Approach for all Canadians Designed to Achieve Best Results for All (made in Quebec, nice try but there is a missing "A" here, and a thumbs-up for the competition at making long acronyms, the way we're going we'll reverse engineer dictionary definitions to make a language of acronyms...), it is meant to learn a language; such tools will be very precious to us. As they grow mature, students can select an emphasis for their work, like choices of books for language courses; poesy or sports or science fiction, or religions, or whatever, such options can be chosen for sports and dance and hanging around too, eventually, when they'll be around 18, they'll select the courses they want themselves. Evidently, that level of integration will be hard to achieve as a starting reality, so there may always be enough of a need or preference for the "classic" learning ways to do things.

School to adolescence is for basic mind skills development; some language and writing, basic math, useful facts, basic philosophy, love, sexuality, in fact, the basis for every possible question they could have in minimal bullshit, and most of these things can be done with games, and that's the first step in the process of preparing children to independence of movement and time. From adolescence to young adulthood, education must switch to be chosen by curiosity or spheres of interest. After that, education is gained purely by curiosity individually or from specific job exigencies.

And repetition is the key, a single course in youth is a waste, half of what is presently learned at school is wasted because repetition or usefulness doesn't exist, we are repeated pub far more often; things are learned as steps while supposing earlier steps will never be forgotten while you increase complexity, and as soon as you drop the pressure, most of it is forgotten except the simpler initial stuff which can be directly useful; you always got to make a serious recapitulation as you advance, and lack of future usefulness is better transformed as ability to learn through diverse activities. Repetition can be using what you learn; a language works well as a learned thing for exactly this reason; we use it creating repetition and unconscious reinforcement, and that's the optic we have to use for everything learned as a basis, but the ultimate human skill we'll want to encourage as a basis is learning ability. The tools and ways we'll find or develop to help people learn easily will be extremely valuable, probably the thing will be related to memory time, the basis may be meant to become more permanent memory, while the rest of what we learn can be temporary, or related to actual activities.

Employers and the reality can benefit greatly from having people who can learn quickly, and since education is mostly free, the needs of reality can be fulfilled more easily. Now, education is a service, daycare centers too, and you know how they work, but like most services there is a free basis. And I'll add a little note of something I believe as positive to human growth too; we should consider life as learning, we should never stop doing it since you never end losing innocence. Furthermore, we can encourage and reward global simple health activities, global mentality activities too. We can even have culture related rites of passage that everybody can pass, as stupid as a pain test in youth, who doesn't like a foot long scar in the face? And a more appropriate one for adults later in life, things like that, but I'm just joking, in case you didn't notice, I'm just saying that when you explain stuff and you don't exaggerate you can do a lot of little special stuff, like weird spiritual activities, it all degenerates when degenerates get on it.

The basis then extension principle is the basis of learning for humans, so it must be the fundamental basis on which you build instruction institutions or structures. Grow a basis should be your motto, you learn Quebecker because that's the basis from which you come from culturally, you can extend that with English as the language of your reality, then others languages can be exposed if you want to learn them. The same attitude must be used for electronic, computers, mathematics, history, love, politics, sexuality, spirituality, even courage, war, valor, justice, truth, compassion, all those and more can be learned as a basis; repeating a few times is the key, and you wouldn't dare telling me repeating for learning is bad when you stuff people's mind, even children's mind, with pub or religious harassment all life long, and who doesn't remember a whole repertoire of songs? Guess how you learned them?

We'll do the same with all the tools most people will have to use in our reality, and there are a lot of them. And the same for music, it will be learned very young and the same with it's physical results that can be dancing and mental results that can be meditation, and no imposed musical instruments; it will be done with the individual preference of the person. And dancing includes cheerleading, just don't suppose that a prerequisite of dancing is sensuality, or doing it in underwear, or showing a maximum of one's sexual attributes...

There are a lot of things that can be tried too, like a class in youth where kids and ado spread for 2 hours doing nothing in absolute silence (without gadgets), just after noon, while for one hour a person wakes-up anybody falling asleep, but they can sleep the second hour. Nothing wrong experimenting "dark nights" weeks too, like a week every month where kids must pass 10 hours nights in total darkness without gadgets, with parents to supervise. You don't need to enforce the thing, but you could give a small reward to those successful at doing it, with a mention in their personal file since everything is there (don't forget you control what is shown in your personal file, but parenthood control your file when you are young, more and more control is given as the person grows older and you gain total control at around 18 (remember the around principle? Here it means maturity, decided from educational results and parenthood but you don't know which gave the biggest influence in the decision, so you can get total control of your file at 16, or at 20 too, and don't forget your attitude with others is part of this judgment too, so don't do the asshole with others).

We will resize, reset or eliminate some professional spheres that don't have an evident benefit right away in our reality, or that made too much bad trying to alienate their profession or knowledge to most people to preserve their expertise. And everything, particularly about life and psychology, will have to be revised in the optic that that the pressure for profitability will be tremendously reduced. That will be done by a better separation of doubtful vs evident truth, truth is better in youth, doubtful things are better exposed as people pass adolescence.

I shouldn't fail to mention that someone may not like mathematics, but simple mathematics in associations can become interesting enough that the person will go beyond a blockage to the point of becoming a mathematician. I had a round and steady 0 in computing in youth, yet, I ended up learning assembly language, electronics, and I found it so easy that I went to school only for the exams, I may have spent 36 hours total there, and I paid 23 000$ for this, can't skip mentioning it, 400$ an hour for the service, and I spent most of it in silence passing exams, and don't forget my IQ is supposed to be low! Think how easy it is for others! And within 10 years, the bankers raised my debt to almost 40 000$ with interests, I was almost sad when I went bankrupt so ridiculous it was...

It will not work like that for us, you got the basis which is that school will be free until 18, then it will be free as long as you provide results, as simple as that. If you fail a course, then your basis (18H) time will have to be increased or something, you can see it as a reward for people who are serious about their studies. You don't have to exaggerate either, at some point you're supposed to use knowledge to do something. Education is a good thing, and people have to make an effort to understand and learn, it permits the reaching of civilization goals, so why, please tell me why would people pay for this? The civilization pay people for doing these things, we don't talk from both sides of the mouth, there are no good justification for making people pay for education, except for people who are not serious about it, and yes it is expensive, but our existence is dependent from it, and life is dependent from its senses at their best. You are not privileged to have an education, it's just normal that you do, we're not education providers like we have a tool to manipulate people because they're dependent from education, they'll make more money later thanks to our great heart of "giving" education, then we'll condemn them by making the education budget dependent from the "tax" they'll have to pay, and we can rent them the education with a loan, forcing them to it by removing their social assistance, condemning the person to reimburse it, and let's get our rich banker friend in the patent to reap fat interests. And private or public change nothing to that. Perfectly wrong isn't it? But not for you, believer in your best system, it make sense, it is good like that and logical, you voted for this, you had your say and that's what you decided.

And yes, everything is part of an economy, of a budget, no choice about it, but part of the reason for a system or budget is to simplify human life, help it, update its basic status as a whole, or reach goals, but in the end everything that form a good system or budget are principles, the foundation of an economy, of a civilization, of a mind, everything is made of principles that make sense, and the most sense win in the end, with the most truth and the most logic. In the end, when this reality will try to look back at how it developed as hell, that will be one of the reasons, even if they'll say it is because people were not submitted enough, or tolerating, or accepting, or pardoning enough, or too individualistic...It's all the fault of troublemakers like me anyway...if life still exists.

Television won't exist under the current form anymore, everything concerning entertainment creativity which can be viewed from the net will be, and there is no fooling around to try making something not available on the net; it will be there by law, free for everybody, within some limitations by age, there is nothing more ridiculous and cheap than having to pay for a photography of something public, like a photography of the sky or the earth or a barn or whatever, anything that can take data form as an end result will be free as a basis; movies, games, shows, sports, even porn. I hope you understand that 18 hours of work a week to have the basis is not that much.

You will have to pay to go to a show in a coliseum because a limitation must exist there, but you won't have to pay to watch it at home. As for rewarding good entertainment or growing it, all you need is to know how appreciated it is then people can put the money they want in it; you know how things works, if people want to prioritize something, they do it through an A&D group, if there is not enough investments in entertainment, you take the credits from somewhere else and put it in entertainment.

As for knowing if something is appreciated and the amount of credits forwarded to it, many ways can be implicated to know, blogging, filling a short form, numbers, all that will ultimately be systemized with an A&D group. Finally, there it is the matter of giving enough value to the type of work structure, and there is nothing to stop people appreciating a kind of work to use their personal credits to increase the amount invested in its development.

At this point I should repeat that nothing is truly free, you work to get the basis, screen entertainment is part of the basis, but if you want good movies and games you'll have to work one way or the other for it, if nobody wants to learn programming and work at such a job, then there will be no games, but if you get a job you'll be paid a salary over the basis which will make your standard of living better while permitting you far more options in entertainment, or fun, than screen entertainment.

Now, there are age limits that will apply since every production that exists, in and out of reality, will be available. You can always buy external drives to stash your personal data, have independent computers too, but everything should be available from the central computer, you can wait a few seconds for caching most programs and you can have personal stashes there too, associated to whatever chest layer of security you want. I see no problem with any data coming from present reality, even religious texts! Just watch out for your children, they're not supposed to end up reading that, it's your responsibility, if you're not careful, you will lose such "channels" forever (can be blunt data as much as TV style productions), even if you divorce. For people under around 18, their choices will be limited to what the new reality accepts as not interfering with our ideals. Past that point you're an independent adult, choose what you want. That A&D group in particular can be taken as an example as to how some transfer some "mental" data, including literature, will go on between realities. I see nothing wrong if some things are modified, replaced or eliminated but the way to the ideal must remain, and one of those is to not stuff innocence with PMBBD.

That means the A&D group judging things for young people will be a highly specialized one. A lot of people today have a dependence problem with TV; eliminate it in this reality and watch nuts level increase (not for me, there are always exceptions, I'm inside out, so television made me nuts and I had to dump it...).

Ideals are defended with limits and laws, minimally, without these there is anarchy, there is no sense in nothing. Leaving things to themselves is the exact ground from which the default laws and limitations of an ego competition arise, profiting from innocence, systemized unfairness, they are logical results, even if the reality got to keep a minimum of sense unless people revolt. The only liberty or freedom a human has is the one to independently judge what the laws of liberty or freedom are. We will eventually want the youth to be mainly limited to our own productions, we'll even make our own Walt Disney cartoons, with all kind of cute animals or insects, with more appropriate attitude reflected more or less humanly, but we surely won't idealize and glorify the worst examples to follow. Still, I will say that most productions, including movies, are good as they are in this reality, but we'll watch-out if they are used as forced indirect pub devices though; you can see alcohol drinking in movies every now and then, but not in most of them, the same for attitudes. Next, we'll have to be careful saying movies are inspired from real facts too, often a justification for a load of bullshit, I could say everything is, most of our history is full of PMBBD inspired from real facts that inspired further facts to add in biographies. Add "some" to your sentence, or you write nothing, or you'll write a long ugly message like saying you're extrapolating your imaginative inspiration from bits of truth, or say there are part of the story that are true; people will decide what they want to believe is. Or include the word "possibilities" somewhere. But was it so hard to add "some"? The goal is not to make believe the story is 99 % true, the goal is to say it is a reconstitution from "some" facts you collected, or that the story could be plausible.

Next, we'll want more diversity and less self-inflation for actors, they are not gods or scintillating "super" "stars" of the sky, they are only making entertainment, it's nothing, really...Personally, I'd never use the same actor or actress more than a dozen times, something like once for every kind of movies, with a limit of 9. And I don't care they don't become experts at seduction, erotism, cuteness and facial expressions; I care about principles, attitudes, results, and I don't like superiority and unfairness and I like love. The more an actor is hyped everywhere, the more he thinks the movie studio manipulation level necessary to make him a "god" is a justification to have people at his feet, taking baths of subjugated admiring fans around red carpets, creating an evil circle where people dream of such "idealistic" lives repeated with full blast effects, even if they have no idea of the implications. The other effect is to increase the banalization of sexuality by the unconscious brainwash effect (you don't see your favorite movie only once), from youth to adulthood, of seeing that same actor or actress seemingly having sexual activities with every newcomer ending-up in an orgy of "love" at the video store. Those are real, supposedly exemplary by their responsibility versus the public, people, not cartoons. The result of this is the quest for the "god" and an influence toward a dividing attitude encouraging shorter term relations from putting the emphasis on the same actors falling in fresh "love" in the bed of a different person as you choose his movie. Yet, even if they're in a story, they don't look like drawings, even to young people.

The solution I see is to have a different actor once for each kind of movie, he act in one super hero movie, he fall in "love" in one movie, not a don-Juan that jumps from movies to movies, kicked by a gigantic moundial international pub machine. So, a dozen movies of different types by actors is enough, but there may be other options. I should say that fame can be seen as a great reward too, but even paying those godly ego 250 000$ a year would be too difficult to this movie industry, even if they're crumbling under money, but they'd prefer to dump it than making new actors or lowering their profits. I prefer to have a hundred times more people showing their acting abilities, without living secluded god lives with the "paparazzi" industry continually running to have a snapshot of the "god". I even think people will come to prefer natural imperfect expressions than the calculated and artificial ones you get from professional manipulators with an inch of makeup. And I'm not talking B movies bad filming meant to do money laundering here, I'm talking professional movies studios that have the competence to make good actors out of many people from the get go.

The other thing to think about is that actors do (fake doing) what's illegal for a lot of people; if we brought them to court for every law they broke in their movies, they'd make gay movies, maybe people would even revolt from missing the reflection of their will to do something violent, or missing their providers of imagination altogether, because it is not everybody that can invent their own movies as they go to sleep like me...But there are always books, which do the same kind of job as movies, while practicing far more mind skills.

The same kind of things happens with all these movies where some guy successfully saves the world from evil, there is a thousand of these, and the effect can be another failure of judgment from an unconscious displacement of responsibility, like there's not enough opportunity for that in this reality... We are invincible, whatever we do some hero will appear and save humanity one second before things crap out, earth explosion style. So for as long as the earth is not exploded we should be ok, and if the earth is actually exploding we can still wait because some hero, probably a politician or superstar, will save humanity. What will happen when some guy really try to save humanity from true evil? It will not work because not only you won't see evil because of the extreme vision portrayed in movies, but you'll unconsciously think it should be the responsibility of a super hero to do everything while you do your usual job. You'll even reject evidence because it doesn't reflect the Hollywood vision.

It's easy to say we are not affected by movies or publicity, that I'm exaggerating, yes I am, but everybody is influenced one way or the other, with people like me are affected all wrong...It's not a question of making the difference between reality and fiction, it is a matter of letting the unconscious open to influences, not using our consciousness to actively control from non-conflicting good and logical principles, letting young people absorb it all without thinking. It's not even hard to do, you just have to think a little about what enters your brain, but questioning reality is not the right attitude to have in hell, it could lead to depression, while I'm a proof that exactly the contrary happens, but it does grows frustration and many other "bad" attitudes, I didn't find peace like advertised...Now I didn't write that to say these movies are bad, I like most of them, it's just to say some people see effects and relations, and some will explain these things for people to better understand, while others will use them for manipulations and profits. I notice these things because I developed my mind in harmony with my view of intelligence, and PMBBD doesn't work much there. I'm even a big fan of doing everything unconsciously, yes, but I form my unconscious from truth to ease the work of life through reproduction, if that is to ever happen for me, and this work need a consciousness developed from principles, understanding of reality and other life, a lot of which is a waste of time and energy meant to decorticate all the idiosyncrasies and PMBBD of this reality I'll concede, but if everybody did it and tried to live the integrity of the weight of their consciousness, then, in my theory, we'll eventually feel things a lot better unconsciously. It's one aspect of life's evolution, in a non-conflicting situation, which is not the case presently, limiting the process greatly, even if there's still a process of genetic evolution, from pressure selection. But the more troublesome the mess you make, the harder the challenge, the better you'll be if you successfully get out of it too, to see the positive of it but I'm kind of pessimist about this kind of potential lately, since the mind messing strategy can lead to irreversible incapacities...

Then you got movies that will use something evidently bad to demonize something good, as a manipulation strategy. It's like a lot of poems or humor; you find yourself intelligent for understanding something, but while doing so you accept an idea behind. I saw one that used privacy invasion as a hypocrite reason to combat change that had has nothing to do with privacy invasion. And the worst part is that the movie ended with absolute privacy invasion as the solution, while it is the most evil vision, the complete destruction of the most basic tool of evolution. It reflect the certitude of a class of people that they got everything under control to the point that they can play with humanity, it's a war against the independent mind by people who aint got the attitude or capacities to write a book like mine for sure...It's the phantasm of the fearful and limited mind that can't stand independence out of jealousy, because they know deep inside that they are irreversibly missing an important humane aspects. It's sick voyeurism from TV mind ablation therapy, degenerated paranoid brains who find comfort in spying others who struggle to live in hell, a place where the rich (gods) can watch people make fools of themselves like entertainment, people tortured by an evil reality they have to adapt to, watched by people hidden behind hypocrite psy formulas of understanding and caring which reflect contempt and sarcasm against the greatest creation of the universe. Evil wants to bring good with them in their pit as a proof that they are right, they prefer a society of clones, and they'll prefer the extinction of humanity than to be proven wrong.

People who spy on others lack independence of mind, when your life means nothing or when your life is a fake fabrication from following trends, then maybe you need to spy on or control other people's lives. I see this as an intellectual handicap. I hate spies, and the more you try to intervene in my life the more I'll want to live it in secrecy, but then manipulators will say secrets are lies or hide evil. I say they are the evil ones, they want clones of themselves to feel secure that they are good or important in their insignificance and they'll try to destroy independence in others, independence that lead to the creation of this book.

It's easier to take from others, it's easier to follow others, it's easier to copy from others. That's what a vast majority of people do; they pick stuff from a vast social pool to inflate themselves an importance, to compete, what they take is in harmony with their goals in life, which is mostly implanted by those who historically took the most means to influence. Real independence of thinking is very rare, and it is only attainable by the most complete people, not only the mind, because the more you want to live in harmony with your conclusions, the harder your life will be if those conclusions don't fit the momentum of pressure selection. In fact, if people really started thinking independently and live in harmony with their conclusions, the current reality would immediately crumble, but that's supposing people's mind start to differentiate bullshit from truth, the mind of most people is half conflicting bullshit, and this is extremely important; our capacity to differentiate bullshit from truth will make the difference between our survival in the universe or our extinction. For now it seems we're making a hell from PMBBD spread all over the earth and prepare to die battling in it when we'll be in the face of the end of hope. Most people even prefer bullshit than truth these days, they even glorify it, even "brain" sites on the internet are heavy distributors of it, half the citations people applaud are not true, and people all give positive comments and likes based on anything weird, cool mainly, emotive bullshit second...

One way to know if you are really having your own opinion is to ask yourself as often as possible, what are you trying to do when you think or talk or act; are you trying to adjust your opinion to fit society or socialization or to get accepted? Bad base for personal judgment. The same if you are trying to be or beat someone else (While you know much less about that person than you know about yourself (supposing you know much about yourself in the first place...), worse for those social people who think they have to win something because of their implanted competitive mentality; many people think that being right or evolved is a matter of putting up a fight, sorry, I learned to steer away from such people, no contact, no fighting, no prison, fuck you! Do you let authority or laws dictate your life? That's a bad base for independence and judgment too. Or maybe you associate social intelligence with good, which is a bad base too, and it means you perceive someone else as or potentially better than you, or you competition for something. You don't need to be a mathematician to find x in the equation, you're still not an adult, some will never be adults, some don't want, what is the percentage of people who just do what others do, or just do because "it's the right thing to do"? Me it's all because it's the logical thing to do, but logical capabilities are proportional to one's average truthful knowledge base, and my human part, my "spirituality", is made of logical possible extrapolations of what I deduct, power 100 imagination potential.

And don't forget we're half the people for a long time, that's half the fan base in everything, sorry. And in the end, whatever your excitation, the blunt facts of reality are that maintaining structuring can become a reality condemnation, a billion people will have a hard time making use and maintaining all the beautiful artists and stadiums of this reality, full of expensive to maintain related things. If there's twice less people there's got to be far less stadiums and artists, and many other things too.

Enforced pub will definitively end. Pub will be categorized on the net and you'll watch it specifically. There are places where some level of pub is adequate, outside stores do it perfectly in this reality, but the internet is not a highway, who said that anyways? We have to stop the imposition of pub on digital content, you may have some when connected to online shopping, but we will give the choice to people, they can have an internet full of pub, or they can select it as categorized when they want it, let's see who wins...But if you push the "pub enable" button, make sure your children are not nearby, children don't need car pub as a brainwash for their future, any pub, ok? Even for kid toys, think about it, wouldn't it be far more interesting that way? You visit a toy store and the kid selects toys because they like them, not because they've been manipulated with pub...

And if you're dependent from the color publicity add to your world, we'll paint and "sculpt" instead, and no ugly painting, professional paintings of good taste, and moving paintings, full effects, colorful neon will be used, projection too, we could even project random computer art (you don't have to tell where it come from), or random whole movies too, but always appropriate and independently powered, that way we can better deal with power lacks or variations. We can spend current equivalent pub money on that, well, maybe less, since its publicity mind manipulation budget (all forms taken together) is just extraordinarily flabbergasting impossibly vast, something impossible for a mind to encompass the cost of, as wasted life energy too, as mind manipulation too; it is a war against the independent mind, a war as costly as the whole military machine of this reality...

So we could use 1/100 the investment to put it on light and color appropriate effects, and that should already give a very big effect, particularly since it is not made for profiting from people, and the investment will last far longer.

The same attitude will apply to music; we'll stop imposing messages to it, so groups will exist as always with one easy condition; they will have to record the musical track apart too, for me, and for public radio because we will encourage music coverage and availability, and I said music, not singing, you'll have channels with all kind of singers, don't worry, I have my tastes, there are very good singers, and I'll be the first to say that's not an easy thing, singing and making shows. So I'm not saying I want to eliminate paroles, I want singers in it for sure, I just want the music free too; I want to listen to any music without a singer if I want, I don't want to be forced to a message along the music if I don't like it.

While I won't say entertainment is not critical to the wellbeing of a civilization, it is not the first priority, and surely not the first basis on which it survives and gets its economy turning. I don't have to tell you that clowns, whatever the form, aren't supposed to make millions and make trips in space, people don't need that to create or have fun. There can be expensive entertainment, but it must not be the main emphasis since people will absolutely want to spend money to participate or buy, and the less people have money, the less they want to invest elsewhere or in the collectivity or toward reality's goals, maybe for the development of systemized entertainment, or increasing the entertainment basis. Furthermore, a lot of people, more than you think, only need a game and a good movie, or a hockey game to be "happy".

We won't reinvent everything, this reality probably developed a lot of creativity facets to almost totality of diversity so we won't go much beyond what it did in these spheres, like the throng of movies with a savior or a justicer defending poor people or people in misery, or movies taking places in such places; if we don't have poor people places and wonderful worlds to save from psychopaths, that kind of movies diversity will be more limited, or the psychopaths will be what you see as many normal people presently, like crazies running all over the world to seize any opportunity to raise masses to expand the Democracy-capitalism business until the world explode in mass death from it. Billions of people have already died from such psychopaths of democracy that want to control the world, and Christian or religious psychopaths who want to take over the world are part of the business, or psychopath publicists and artists who want to take over the world with PMBBD liberties, they don't care destroying the mind of humanity for it, the same for sex psychopaths on the internet who work hard to make a world where people have free hardcore sex everywhere in front of millions. Be careful of who the real psychopath are.4/8

Would Metallica invent "justice for all" in our reality? If we had a good reality with no feeling of unfairness from long ago, you'd have missed that diversity of entertainment, that's what I mean, probably the music would have existed but the paroles would have been very different, that's in part why I don't like music condemned to paroles, or a state of mind, a lot of songs will sound quite bizarre in our reality, and extraterrestrials descending here would ask themselves what kind of a people we are, having singers raging about our system like that, and young troublemakers (an acceptable activity from what I experienced...) would find themselves a niche for stupidity if they fell in admiration with those singers. You're in a different reality with different entertainment now, and the music is free here, but we'll have both options; the tune with a singer that can profit from his singing, and the music track will exist freely for people to sing whatever they want on it, no monopolizing of music from now on, singers can only monopolize their paroles. Or if you want to see it differently, singers are a version of paroles associated to the music, like a guitar player around a fire; what do you think came first on earth? The earth played music and life sang. Now, singing is music, what is not music are paroles, paroles are sounds with a "predetermined" meaning, and that's where I debark, the good order is broken because the paroles and meaning, which can be any twisted thing in the name of liberty, can take total predominance over the music. In our reality, singer will be one option for the music, people can invent other paroles fitting the music without charge, and people like me will listen to cool music, or choose themselves a song fitting it, or listen to other languages singing on it; I'm a fascinated incompetent listening to languages flowing like music.

So you won't see super heroes and armed blue berets saving poor people's lives since there won't be poor people, and there won't be nobody to boast how good he is because he help the poor either, sorry for you, no philanthropists in our reality, and patchers get upgraded, they don't form an interdependent big slab of the good people that prevent the reality from crashing unto the unfairly rich and their helpers and defenders. As for heroes, they will fight for something good, not for shows; you don't help or save poor people to keep them poor and in more needs from the needs of your attitude, and the true heroes are not in entertainment. Anyway, we won't produce poor people. And next, you won't need to publicize good people sacrificing either; only in hell do people need to sacrifice their life to do good, and no little Jesus too.

Now, for many ego people, they won't survive in our reality, they'll die, too boring, too monotonous they'll surely say, they are a historical selection and we can do nothing about it, they are meant to need stimulations of evil sight and actions, they have lost many sensitivities while compensating with emotions gotten from hype, they are made for this reality, and they must stay there. Next, we must not forget that the rich and powerful need tons of entertainment, and the expensive and difficult to produce kind, while there must be tons of it available to the population too, so it keep on thinking visual, believing things are all-right too, and some don't need more than some entertainment to stay alive and encourage the system in place. So a lot of entertainment facets are almost developed to finality.

We don't want entertainment dependent people, this is a very dangerous game this reality is playing with this overload overhyped need for sex and entertainment, where people try all their might to have fun, creating cycles where people wait years to see their "god" live for a gigantic show like their whole life was worth it for that moment. This kind of stuff is another proof that the selection is deficient, and the main problem is media people creating hype, and you can see its effect when there are children around crying because of the hype, I absolutely hate to see children manipulated to such an extent that they show emotions on subjects that need a high level understanding while they understand nothing, like children admiring politicians, or defending the system, or a religion, there are all kind of examples where manipulators profit from innocence, even homosexuals are in the business, making of their festival a family thing.

Anyway, we surely don't want to get people in their entertainment high come make their depression in our reality. And the same for all those loaded with pills to be happy. You don't drop the can like the new reality looks like better peanuts; we want motivated people, not boosted on hype and happy pills, but it doesn't mean we can't appreciate boosted people, it just mean that a spirit comes with success, and when your spirit loses its boosts, it got a tendency to go below the ground. If you want to depress you won't find a shoulder in our reality, if the cause was the reality you encouraged, then it is logical that it is the one to reap the bad feelings.

As for boosted, new and wow people, you cannot trust them, so we'll have to wait for their excitation to end before having an idea of the truth of them; you may have a list of a million brave people, but when the action moment is there you'll find out that half the list are names of cowards or hysterics, people that lied to themselves and others. And who will be responsible for the failure of the plan? No plans for me, you don't waste a good plan with mediocrity. Those people are not the best candidates to be helpful to the new reality, too susceptible to hype, and we don't want excited people or frustrated in their ego dreams; if you want to play doom shooter, do it in hell. Excited people that only think new or wow should be dropped on mars to do some new and wow, a lot is needed there, so round-up your artists and clowns and let's go to mars, we'll se if you can provide some, great hype on your shoulders, (You should really send that stupid space clown there, with a load of bottled water, and pay the trip with "his" money), but I guess they'll have time to make a mars out of earth before considering, that way they'll live in luxury all along...

So don't think your life will become disco-rainbow-techno-orgasm, if that could be seen as a positive thing; anybody that made the affirmation that he is happy in this reality stays there, those people have found their place and are happy, and we definitively don't want to disturb people who have found their paradise. We do a mature civilization, we've had enough of funky town self-justified morons, with their publicized movies of one after the other sex and drug revolutions. We stand for good things, not adult immaturity, we want the successful human that strive to do good and act fairly, why not? Evil then? Unfairness? Free for all then? The first on the cake? And if you need heavy stimulation from hell to feel alive, then there are bloody stimulations that exist exactly for your kind of psychology that say we become senile if we lack stimulation, particularly social stimulation, evidently. Nobody got less stimulation than me, and I absolutely don't feel like I'm developing senility, exactly the contrary! This reality is too full of PMBBD and that creates loads of depression while singing people are happy, in a state of control that is oppressive through means limitations and publicity while singing people are free, etc,etc,etc, inconsistency, bullshit, a lot of people get old as inadequate with atrophied brain functions, added to some amertume (sourness), added to feeling worthless, added to no real pride level, added to continual hype placebo after effects, added to conflicting results in their life beliefs, added to feeling cheated, all kind of things like that. And if they lose their independent strength of will, then you got to stimulate them manually or through socialization. And lifelong heavy social stimulation for a shut down when sex stimulation becomes difficult is no better.

I passed my life without much stimulation, except games, and I didn't grow a moron, quite the contrary. I don't say everybody is like me, but this is another perversion of how life works, and a pressure selection way; this reality doesn't want stimulated people like me, it want them standard container, excited robots or zombies that do a job and pay taxes while doing all kind of things that don't make sense to get stimulated for the "economy", or live a selected package of emotions outside the range of psy machinations. All what make a sane human being can take the dump if it can't be used to make a profit. The problem is that this attitude makes us an enemy of life, until we only think about the unfair "economy" that is absolutely not in harmony with life ways.

These scientific and expert affirmations about the social animal needing constant stimuli are totally wrong, the truth is that it is what the reality wants, the same way it produces people with all kind of problems then heal the "sicknesses" of those people so they feel like the problem is themselves and better adapt to the reality, then they make affirmations that people are like this and like that, while totally ignoring the historic genetic reinforcement effect this attitude has on the population until we end-up with a selection that totally fits the philosophy of the reality. There are people with real problems, no doubt about it, but this reality creates or develops or encourages more problems. And you can bring me any ego stimulated workaholic full of youth secrets books, they are no better than psy, I have almost all the necessary attitudes contrary to what I'm supposed to do to live longer and healthier, everybody, particularly old people, and fat ones too, told me I'd die young or get old fast, while nothing of the sort happened; I'm on par with my age, and I got a good mind as a add on, so what's wrong? Pressure selection, or maybe I'm hot headed if I develop a strong different opinion, if all else fails...Your affirmations don't concern me, and that means you're lying, I'm human or not? Then why do you say "everybody"? Why do you make final affirmations about human behavior? You are god? You know all humans? They're all the same?

Then there are the morons who boast that the trick to be younger is to fuck with young people; everybody knows that being happy and having a young entourage or a positive one has a positive effect on us, that doesn't mean we're supposed to fuck with young people or seek innocence instead of looking at the truth of reality discarding our most fundamental responsibility; people who do that are shoveling problems, even their true ugliness, to future generations. Besides, people are supposed to always live longer, are you past 125 years fucking with younger people? And don't worry, scientist are all in that mania, they encourage it as an anti-depressive, they even say the more we have sex the better we sleep, all proven scientifically, and me in that? I'm inhuman? I sleep very well, and I didn't have sex in more than 15 years, and I'm super horny, what do you make of that? This is all brainwash or autosuggestion or placebo, but yes, if you continually bug me that all my problems are because I don't have enough sex, then I may get a gun and truly become a problem.

The same for dreaming that is supposed to happen at a precise phase of sleep, I take a 15 minutes nap in the afternoon and Poof! I'm dreaming! What do you make of that? And I make as complex a dream within a nap as I do in the night. The same for eating, I don't eat half my capacity but full, and almost continually at it, and I'm thin to nerves, you can see the strings of my muscles and all my veins, I can lift myself with one arm, and I don't train for hours in a gym, I train a few minutes with car batteries and take a walk! Sometimes I'm months without getting out, what do you make of that? I'm always an exception? I make a collection? Nothing of the sort, it is all pressure selection to eliminate risky diversity, to condemn humanity to a standardization of mentality; are you going to include me in your health or youth recipes someday? There are very fine people who are not like what scientists and psy think the sane human should be, and masses are different than your friend or even your scientific study based on "random" picking, did I made a speech about people talking to masses, including religions and pub? And I don't care if you make a few mistakes and retract them, but when you heat the same PMBBD 3 times, I grow red and remember forever.

Yet, I'm not beyond health problems; people grow old one way or the other, and the way I'm going, I may die earlier from a heart attack, and you'll have caused it by your false affirmations, all of you who know better than me who I am, you cause me stress, you cause me mind troubles. I'm starting to have a hard time believing it a good idea to publish this, I could increase depression rate in my corner of the best health care system of the world where people who are majorly happy (news pool, journalism.) suicide big, and I'm careful not to confound those who suicide fast with those who take their time, media people are touchy on that... I guess you can confound depending if the confusion serves the agenda of manipulators and profiteers or not...And we are the biggest eaters of anti-depressive around at it, with vast psy support, so what's the problem? The whole mind alteration gamut doesn't work? And you better not smoke a cigarette! We're besieged by nutritionists, sport, health, psy, spiritual and yoga maniacs that think humanity is like them, except me, as always, and since we're not suicidally happy and healthy enough, we're now implanting happiness chips in people with which you can program people's state of mind. You wanted to become happily working robots encouraging whatever the hell you live in?

The failure to be happy is the failure of the human as an enemy of life, this is the failure of knowledge about life, about the human and its mind. People are ready to be invaded and violated by anything to persevere encouraging this reality, they are ready to pay any price, even have their state of mind remote controlled to encourage their system, or to accept and tolerate, we are being invaded by mentally sick people of all kind, and they say it themselves. It's like we're in a cult, I suppose this pyramidal reality has become a reflection of all those pyramid builders where most of the population worked with unwavering faith in their system. So you can bet that we won't want people who are dependent of a happy pill or drug to enter the life reality, even if we'll have that problem too, in a small minority of our citizens. As for chips to change the state of mind of people with a remote control, this is the true form of the matrix; brains connected to mood enhancement chips, and the people that permitted this to happens are at the next level of supreme ego and evil, the same for those who happily plant people with anti-depressives.

And yes I smoked pot, cigarettes and drank alcohol, no choice about it I could say, but whatever I went through, I never abandoned life. And I surely won't make the affirmation that everybody is like me, and I don't try to make you lie, I'm revolted against this world, I'm frustrated to see what we could be as a humanity, and that is exacerbated by how I feel versus how I should be to fit the view of this reality as to what is a normal human, I feel selectively lied to when I meet any stuff talking about good attitudes. Everything is so wonderful and always getting better and always on the verge of final healing or breakthrough; soon some Viagra pharmaceutical will find the jouvence pill, we're on the verge of living and "loving" eternally, and that would be so good, just think about it, and maybe you won't want it after all...

And you can stuff your yoga retreat and spiritual PMBBD retreat in that too, all placebos, and, whatever my troubles, I bet you won't live any longer than me, and I eat red meat, I smoke, I don't do yoga, no socialization, no money, no food full of benefits, heavy anguish to the point I almost aint got fingernails anymore, so don't you ever raise your nose to me with your yoga and spiritual profiting, I can imagine what kind of true love failure this attitude leads to, but I'll stop it at that; you're stressing me to death, and since I aint got money for your retreat or guru, I'll go in bed a few minutes; that's the most wonderful form of yoga life gave me, then I'll stretch a little before throwing you in the same bag than religious illuminated, close your eyes and position yourself in front of your master, you'll find peace, and me too.

To be at the human level of needed form of stimulation, generally, what you need is to like life; when you do you always find something stimulating, not necessarily entertainment. And if you want a good start at this you need what I described earlier as an education; you need a very large basis of learning producing versatile people that develop specialization around adulthood. Where you pass 4 hours doing brain stuff, you must pass 4 hours doing physical stuff, and art and entertainment is one of these "physical" things, not all of it; you already pass loads of time with a pencil in the hand, a paint brush may not be the ideal next activity, art and sports are part of this but not the most of it, you don't need sports to spend energy and build muscles, even if they are important. What I mean is that most of these activities are not related to global life ways, even if they develop precise human skills all-right; you can paint a forest all you want from screen inspiration, but when I'll drop you in actual forest, animals and plants won't attract your attention and you'll lament about the flies and break a wrist or an ankle at the first opportunity to go back asphalt, and don't you ever dare tell me that knowing the forest is less important than knowing hockey.

Versatility is the word, if you find 100 physical activities that can be developed as courses which may later be useful, individual or stepped through growth, then sport is a small percentage of that. And the same for mind things. Now, I understand that learning doesn't work simply, that there are necessary emphasizes, that you must do things in steps, year after years, reading and writing as the most simple and evident first step; you don't learn much without knowing how to read and write.

The actual learning system is not bad, but it is made for a precise result, a precise set of ways. For us to open more possibilities we must do anything this reality does for a start, even if the time values are modified. What is missing is time, where do you take it? You got to optimize for the youth, remove laborious details, mathematics may be simplified, and there are things you can almost eliminate, like lots of history, even if some will make a paranoia about it, particularly governments and nationalists; you can go nuts over it later is what I say.

Whatever the path of learning, you definitively want to have adult expertise that can build things like a nuclear reactor and make it work well, expertise that can make heavy research, that advances toward civilization goals, create good entertainment, make people happy. If you can do all of these things, then what's wrong if the learning way is different? So there is nothing to stop cultures to have specifics in their learning ways, but you have an idea of the wanted emphasis. As for changes, cultural habitudes are not an argument, it is guaranteed that there are many people who don't like changes, and they will lament that the old way was better, but we're doing a different reality, no?

As for senility, a mind must always work in diversity to stay healthy, is that simple enough? And that doesn't mean in conflict or unnecessary complexity, the basis must always be the less complex possible, and it must be continually updated or expanded, complexity is personally built over that. Good activities for the mind can be playing games, learning a second language is excellent too, the same for physically or dexterity difficult exercises.

If your intelligence is historically mainly stimulated by entertainment, then reducing or changing the entertainment will lead to mind atrophy on some facets, the not enough space and time principle, the same for babbling. What I mean is that you reap what you sow, right through to the DNA, condemning future people to what you like and to your attitudes too, right down to their person; don't think you only transmit blue eyes, you transmit politicians too, you transmit your sex attitudes, at the price of other things, someone with blue eyes aint got green eyes whatever he believe he's supposed to have them all, that's the same for the mind, and it is not something science can see, "super" "stars" aint got a blue and scintillating mind of the sky, they're all grey, and form can mean anything. There are things everybody has, like a basis, and there are other things that take a thousand years of sustained stable truth to begin showing, and they won't necessarily appear if we're overloaded in mind complexity.

Now, whatever you take that in consideration or not, this reality is condemned to heavy entertainment needs, but it's a bit ridiculous to think we will have to wait until it is deep in wastes, that way the selection won't say the new reality is boring because they're missing what brought this reality to the hole in part; I personally believe entertainment is coming at its top hype effect and is degenerating in craziness while the profiteers defend it as art, like art is a final argument from god. I say true art is very limited as a notion, and only stupid people see art everywhere or confound a track of piss with art, or make art out of piss, leave that alone, that's art for the UI (the artistic beauty of how things work, the perfection).

So maybe I should wait years before publishing, to be taken seriously, until people realize the entertainment overload on hype for "gods" was a big part of the failure, where is this god that decided to make entertainment world anyway? On what premise did he took his decision, why? The same for the reality I could say, some antiquity figurine I guess, atlas I think, that was dangling from someone's smelly something. Or is it M.Olympia? So I guess I'll have to patiently wait until people die at the megatons, while smoking a pipe, watch billions of people die until those left alive reconsider their certitudes about happiness and what's good... As long as we're not near total extinguishion it's only temporary problems you know, people are so indoctrinated to the current system that they'll almost need humanity's extinction as a proof that they were living with a fundamentally flawed mentality.

So I should publish when people are dead all over in sicknesses, suicide, cataclysms and famines, if i do it before that everything will get twisted in bitching and my work forgotten, if I get published at all...But on the other hand people may not be in a receptive state of mind. And since a new reality is very long to become successful, many people will lament because their reality aint got all means anymore, as an argument that things would be better if we didn't do it, that we prevented their great vision of the future to become reality. Or use my work to defend the current way of things, or say I'm an asshole and just profit from it to gain time, maybe to pass through what they see as hard times. They'll do the denial thing, refusing to understand; we only got some problems to go through, that they're doing changes or even a new reality to calm fears. That sounds fatalist, but I'm just telling you of the possible manipulation traps which may fail things, depression, dependences, lack of true will, wrong views.

We want people to grow finding basic happiness in reaching good goals, that's their judgment we want and that's an ideal. I don't think everybody will be happy, but those pedophiles who stay forever young without good laws, profiteers of innocence and life, you have no place here, not even a spending category. We put our energy on good will and logic too, even if some would like to twist logic to a negative thing...Yet, if someone tells you not everything is logic, he's lying; everything is logic, even life, break the logic, pay the price, whatever the form, displacement or time lapse. Now that doesn't mean there is no variable level of truth possibilities available, that way diversity can exist, so everything is a question of limitations too, and forces and pressures rapports he too, and that makes logic, yes, a relative and variable thing, to some precisely variable limits...

A new reality is a human challenge, we must take it, and I believe we will, and I believe it will be an extraordinary success, but, but, but. Did I say there is always an appropriate price to pay for past evil and appropriate rewards for good? Yeah, I'm sorry for you, but we want to pay minimum, so we'll make a heavy selection on discriminatory principles that don't make sense to human rights and liberty activists. And that can be an argument for some saintly governments who never discriminated in their history to start a PMBBD campaign.

While still talking entertainment, you already know prostitution and drugs will still exist, so there is nothing to stop you, as an adult to take ecstasy and cocaine to participate in "adequate" raves, but, even if we'll encourage young people socializing and dancing, people who encourage or publicize a path of drugging, alcohol and no brainer sex, particularly in children and adolescents, will automatically be removed their citizen status. Furthermore, such markets will stay small enough not to be noticed, I've known enough people sniffing cocaine that I'm ready to declare it a worldwide epidemic, along with rave "peanuts", and the police is so ineffective limiting consumption you have to wonder if they need to keep it running, too many people make money from it, and a lot of politicians are or have been related to these businesses too.

And entertainment too is like a drug, you get used to it, you need always more, you need always better, until you need to stop it, too late, there is too much and we live 100 years, pressures, PMBBD, we select, placebo effects. You are the drug man, the reality you're making, where you put the means you have, your life energy building mental physical and reality, we could live 100-125 years globally with a better philosophy of life, less pollution, no stress over immediate basic survival. We will minimize youth pressure and stress, we will reduce inadequate parenthood with a more valuable vision of love, and we'll give people the sentiment that things are fair by having a philosophy showing it globally. We got machines, technology, power, super communication, beauty creams, perfumes, and throngs of other things that when used well form the human drugs, I'm sure we can make life, the planet, humanity so wonderful by working the reality toward noble goals, that the whole universe of aliens would invest big means for you to the point of becoming dependent of your contacts; they'd drink your attitude like a drug.

You can guess that good entertainment is critical to make a beautiful reality, but as a priority, or as a survival tool, I'd say it is the lowest denominator of creativity; any tribe of savage can do entertainment, dance and sing around the fire for a start, but can those artists make themselves computers? Where would artists be today without the programmers, the computers and cameras they use to try implanting in people that they possess the monopoly of creativity? Do you often hear a programmer boasting on pub to the world about their great creativity that, in truth, has infinitively more value? I'd be nothing without them, why don't we call any creative person an artist? You think talking and making a language have less value than singing? Next, all what entertainment need to develop is the open set of possibilities coming from the reality itself, entertainment will fill all space available to it by itself over time, the only limitation are the reality limitations themselves.

So, someone making programs have more value to me than a singer or actor, whatever both are critically important, will that be reflected in the new reality? And I don't care one do something limited to servicing a few people or a million; work is work, so either you pay the entertainer less for his work, or you pay the programmer more. In the end, if you ask me to bring a few people in space, I surely won't choose a Hollywood "super" "star" since it would be a guaranteed ruin and a damn load of troubles, so slap that word "star" out their hands, it has nothing to do there; "super" "egos" is absolutely more appropriate and that's it that's all. And isn't the planet a vessel traveling the galaxy? Now, if we gave an extraordinary senseless value to entertainers with PMBBD and hype, particularly as an escape of reality based on ego satisfaction, then you're as well say you're dependent of it and condemned.

Finally, you person is meant to be controlled or limited in function of others or good and evil, if you cannot do it, then limits must be set by society, and in my mind nobody is worth more than something like 250 000$ a year. The best entertainer of all cannot go over that without passing the threshold of grave and evident unfairness, whatever the image, even if the whole planet is on its knees and give all its money in publicized admiration. And a good mass food grower, to be fair, must be capable of reaching the same personal value to reality than the best entertainer, minimally.

That's how I'd prefer to see things for the life reality; as a ladder of efforts at gaining expertise. The most difficult to gain while being the most important in priority expertise is the most valuable, and the absolute best at it is worth the biggest pay. 50 000$ over the basis is some serious credits, 250 000$ is big luxury for us, but sorry for the yacht, unless that's the sole thing you'll possess. There are many millions of people, the top part of the pyramids, who are paid around such salaries, that's the "high class", people unfair to others, singing moralization while they can spend 10 000$ in the blink of an eye, which is almost twice my means for a whole year, making voyage every years to open their mind and horizons they'll say; well, my mind is more open to the world in my prison, and I'll open far more than my own ego mind while you burn money polluting around, and I'll add that you're not opening your mind, you're closing it to anything else but your beloved reality that work well for you, you're learning to "love" it more, and at the same time you're limiting the mind of tons of people around you while you think everybody can become rich. You are the final unfair selection, the most ego ones, there is no way the planet can provide an adequate standard of living to everybody with your attitude. The next step is probably the end of the civilization at their hand, and at the hands of forever increasing population who dream of becoming rich; they got many needs to satisfy while a billion of them are still stuffing rice for survival, they got lots of things to gain, all kind of rich examples to dream about. As for who will survive to continue to the end, it is those that will be the most responsible for it, but that's pessimist, let's not think about that.

So we'll copy, yes copy, not buy, lots of stuff and expand and diversify from it in our own ways. We will appreciate as much entertainment from the father reality as it deems us worthy of, but we may remove some evident aberrations concerning love. As for alcohol drinking everywhere in movies, no problem with it, or almost anything else in movies for that matter; it will eventually be historically lost in the mixing of entertainment from both realities. Structures, diversity, entertainment that is positive and that exist do exist, those include all their associated needs; structures are costly, what exist must be used, but as things are transferred we will modify more to our reality's tastes when needed, and that include a lot of razing; that's the way of things and evolution, the need for death and demolition too.

And you are not less worthy because you have less of the creativity skill; there's a limit to creativity, you don't invent the same potato twice, well, and no 2 potatoes are the same, talking creativity, I think that's actually super big, to understand that all the work of the universe is genuine, pure diversity of incomparable extent, and life is an example of that, and to think scientists see the future of humanity in the sky as cloning is quite an insult...The life reality is the next step in human wellbeing, it is meant to relax more while slowly developing ultimate creativities that may need vast groupings of associated specialties with enough efficiency. We'll need that for very advanced concentrated medicine, computing, nanotech, bioengineering, and interplanetary vessels too, things like that.

And yes there is still tons of creativity that can be accomplished by lone people, but after 2000 harlequins the subject stagnates, you do with it and accept that the fan base will be limited. You can forget your dreams of having a castle on the moon, but you can be sure that if you got a dream or creativity you can describe, society will not forget it; we know they can be very important, we'll keep a list of people who want to do special things and there will be a lot of credits circulating in such directions, but like everything else, you'll have to go through an A&D group. Now that will depend on what you want to do, if you dream of becoming someone specific, attain a personal goal or help civilization in one of its goals, you'll know the needs of the reality in those areas, the exigencies and the possible paths, and if you want to invent something or start a business or a company, your project will be studied.

There must always be encouragements to develop creativity in all facets of the reality, but we don't need to put people in misery as a pressure for more creativity. I personally believe there are always people who are more "made" (destiny) to develop some creativity facets, and I believe they'll develop it if they have the means to, even if you don't put pressure or encouragements. Still, there is nothing wrong with encouraging it in all kind of ways, but we absolutely don't need to make an ego competition out of it.

As I already said, we don't have to reinvent stuff for the fun of being creative, we can do that and practice becoming competent at it with games though, but life is not a game, and the more the civilization advances, the more creativity become gigantic vastly associated projects, like father reality that have hit the point of a new form of creativity that can only exist through a vast association of expertise and powers of everything and everybody that compose the reality; the creation of a new reality.

People should have waken-up long ago to the fact that creation is rarely the fruit of a lone superior entity dude anymore, it's the end of this ideology, almost all creativity is highly associated and dependent on other expertises, all as valuable, you can't say you're superior when you're all interdependent; you remove a dependency and the superiority crumble, so all expertise is as valuable as the superior dude.

I should go back to specify that I can appreciate people who want to sing with instruments as a groups on stages or whatever social situation, I'm sure I'm supposed to enjoy shows with singers too. I was talking about the musical composition that will exist without a singer in equivalent or superior quality for as long or longer. That's a problem with my attitude, it tends to sound like I'm in the know and people don't have to think and just follow, but no, there are all kind of details I forget, and when they appear I'm not necessarily there so it's all a matter of understanding the idea of what I explain, it comes with another phenomenon I notice as I write too, this wheel effect of my subjects coming back every few pages, that I notice and move some years later...

That won't require more work, maybe a little more, anyway you don't want to do it, society will do it, any musical creation will have to be spread freely, while paroles are limited for the forming phase of our youth. But you'll still be paid your worth for the creation, don't worry, the difference is that no monopoly of music will exist anymore and the singer will get the pay of a singer with different bonuses depending on popularity; he doesn't get money proportional to manipulation or pub market ability anymore, but a performance may be rewarded big money over salary depending on attendance, or feedback. The exception here are "singers" that don't pass messages, they can condemn music as much as they want because they are instruments; they are music, not messengers.

Music is a strong unconscious implanter and it must be used independently, just count how many people know the paroles of their songs by heart. I don't like good music encouraging distributing all kind of twisted mentalities, I want the liberty to be free of the message or pub, and I don't want it to be implanted in my head so strongly I sing it consciously! And music is not a possession since the best melodies for a single category are a finite thing, we want everybody to use any melodies they want without thinking they're copying someone, and the worst horror is to definitively condemn a melody to a message or singer. Do we have to pay someone every time we use a mathematical formula? Do we associate a mentality or publicity to it? In fact, you could see music as harmonized mathematics, simple rhythms of life at first, then it grew in complexity, and what permitted mathematics to become enjoyable as music is the truth of it, maybe when we'll defend the truth of love (I'm not talking about sex) it will drive our soul as easily as music. So music will be free for us; we pay the inventor from appreciation for a set number of time, and that's it, the music is then totally free. Why do we have to pay eternally for it? Is that the goal of creation? Singers are entertainers on music and that's all, but if they want, in our reality, they can take any tune, and babble stupidities on it all they want.

That will finally free music and singers and their limitations. That's how we'll have it in our reality; sing all you want, anything you want, make shows and all, I just ask that minimal space of independent thinking while hearing the best music. With that I'll be able to enjoy new musical creations without message implantations I end-up knowing by heart want it or not, all the way to the end of my life, and my musical horizons will expand.

It's a different reality, it's not the same, everything is different, and one more thing, it's another reality, an alien thing, you "love" your reality? Stay in it, we see music differently here, whatever the whole world is brainwashed unconscious to need godly singers to condemn music from times immemorial, you know how ego is; if it finds a crack it will try to systemize an eternal profit structure using PMBBD to the point of making it a cultural trait if they can. Music can be eternal, it cannot be possessed by a singer, but that doesn't stop a singer from making the tons of money they like so much to waste in insignificances, or worse, for many... Now, you could see musicians hiring singers too, and it doesn't stop anybody from being paid from appreciation levels.

You know what I think of liberty, that there is a best place and way for everything too; ego exaggerations must be limited, to have more power as a mass, and it's like an intrinsic part of reaching ideals. Singers, for me, are exactly the same thing as religious bosses and pub, we don't want religious bosses to start making love music and spread the good parole, right? Nobody will have it imposed, particularly on children, but I want them to listen to as much music as possible, so either you sing the alphabet on heavy metal, or you shut your stupid mouth in the presence of children.

Yet you know, we all know, that doing this in totality is impossible, you can't separate children from everything, and you can't let people say all they want around them, and since ego is first on the cake, ego takes, profit, and cheat, that is an unbelievable load of troubles, and a big disadvantage for good. But everything is played there, what enters the mind of the youth, everything will come down to this question of what level we'll let ego profit from innocence (ignorance, disinformation).

So again, to stop the throng of manipulators singing liberty I see coming, I'll hit them with a shockwave right away, question of getting them some distance away their ass rubbing the ground...So I'll say that yes, believe it or not, and whatever you think, you can lose all innocence without a manipulator to profit from it, you only need time. Damn! That sets a bottom line!

You know I don't fight for extermination, I did start a bit extremist though, before gaining equilibrium, and that's a shame real fighters actually have to go through this, breaking their career at fighting evil right there by being stuck with these extremes as a reputation, you're as well become entertainment fighter...Seriously, I don't understand current psy science has not defined this effect and place it as their most important understanding. Because it's exactly the biggest evidence you can see everywhere, that this reality use to crush people, this momentum that come with the strength you need to free yourself of something or stand and fight, not just scratch your ass as a psy, and the will involved, and how do you gain will when people are all discouraging you, or worse, act condescending? By all kind of extremes, like exaggerated denial, often just empty rage, and you are stuck with it because you grow, the strange thing is that for me I'm happy that I took the quest to get out of it, but understanding just kind of displaced it, and now I have extreme anger fits, my body shake, my heart want to explode, I'm sire I could sprint kill a hundred people without taking a breath of air, and that is just flabbergasting to me, because I never lived things like that before, as an innocent I was super nice and peaceful, well, people did piss me off a little, with justification I think, society did too, I could still get angry, but like 10%. So is it the beast thing inside me that's going to rip me apart to rampage the world or something doesn't work somewhere in your psychological knowledge? This effect has been evident to me as soon as I looked behind me, and not only I've never heard about it, but in fact the reality squarely use it in its process of selection, so it is a tool that has been used to manipulate people for millennia, by pointing everywhere at crazies, as adults who react like babies (back to basic preservation strategies), and this self-inflated science of human behavior acts like it has no idea! I wouldn't let them deal with my anger issues for sure...

All these things I've demonized through my writings are still there, my initial instinct was right on the spot, if not I wouldn't have gotten this result, and now that I managed the equilibrium line, it's like I'm overcharged by the extremes around me, something's gotta have to give somewhere...It does sometimes, and it's not pretty. The problem here is that I can't find the end of it because I can't find my place, all the options can be deception, and no vengeance is worth it, no sex is worth it, even being god is not worth it, I think it's actually super grave, it's like my soul is wrenched all the way to all what I can believe in, so now I sometime work out of spite, because I'm as well be a fucking moron and take drugs, it's not worth it to try to stand for things, it's just troubles, and you grow a broken heart, or super frustrated; it's not worth it to live. That's my conclusion these days, and everything is proving me I'm right, to the point that even my glorious UI has become a source of doubt. Do I want more troubles? Do I want to pass eternity pissed-off or in fear? Then, after all I went through I'll have one supplication, please let me just disappear. Or maybe I'll take what life can have without being had (the only thing I know that can provide that is society (life itself, as people), but it does exactly the contrary...), and don't try to get me with spiritual or philosophical or wisdom crap, we're face to face because we're through with this, I experienced lacks and frustrations that I know can be weaknesses, is that what you wanted? That I grow weaknesses so you can play psy and condescending entity? Am I just a joke? I'm ready to press the red button here; tell me what can life stand upon as a guarantee, that she can build upon, invest in, and trust. But then Miss wisdom will tell me that whoever cheats gets had, so I should deal the matter with life, or, if you prefer, you are life, get your shit together. Like what? Go back to earth and try to convince those morons to get their shit together? And take a paddle and beat mother earth with it for all the troubles she's giving me? And just die?

So I continue because why not? What the fuck? I should even be harsher; as an extension and as a sense of life, the entity I owe something to, here is my opinion of what's going on earth surface, I didn't enjoy the human systematization aspect of it, at all, I tried to change it but I couldn't, and all the beautiful is not worth the broken heart of the deception, I hated it so much that I practically couldn't touch or interact with all it manipulated. I'm extremely frustrated because I know the futility of all my argumentation, I know there is no reward that will make me forget, because the perspective I gained down there and all my argumentation tends to prove that in fact I'm living in a perfectly Machiavelic universe, developing as the pride of life is an ass, developing as a person with common sense, intelligent and sensible is a fantastic challenge that completely disgust you of practically everything, if that's the reward you're supposed to get, it looks far more enjoyable to be a moron, so goodbye, I wish you all good luck, I can't stand for this, just zap me and be done already, and let my heart beat through the mind of all the life who will know my words. "You got to be shitting me? Who say things like that?" It's just a joke, the witness system in action, and yes it's super funny, how many answers for the same question? I'm educated and I understand stuff now? Yeah? So? I can't even trust my feelings anymore because my mind intercept and question what's going on and if I'm not faking it, while simultaneously imagining that would still be better than becoming a moron psychopath...

While it is true that better understanding changed everything, and that I would have completely misused a sword in my youth, the fact remains that I was just writing and the message was still on target; with minimal psychological respect and understanding you had everything to see the potential, but your eyes are filled with fake bullshit so it's logical that you couldn't, because my opinion is that fucking morons laughed, fucking morons psychopaths thief condescending cheaters (FMPTCC people) like the ones that invented Christianity, and today I'm the one laughing, even if funny has no relation with the frustration and rage I cumulated with time, but I try, to have fun.

So that's what I do now, I try to steer away from totalitarian regimes like the democracy capitalism business (It's just a perspective, the way the earth and the universe works you got to have a structure to prevent limited resources from getting wasted by profiteers in competition and stop different type of people battling over space; the democracy capitalism business does exactly the contrary, so I try to steer away from it, ok?). If I see homosexuals once in a while, no problem, the problems is with extremes and pressures. If my kid asks me why is it, I'll be happy to explain my dad vision that it's a "luck" thing in big part that get them to prefer having sex with men, and I may even defend them, but if my kid go to their festival and come back home strange and start dancing around the kitchen with ideas that being homosexual is a fun or good thing or normal or an advantage (I could really worsen this scenario...), then I'll see it as a problem and I'll debark in their festival to show my kid the real fun part...The same if I can't watch television without seeing them boast how intellectually superior or of better taste, or finesse, or evolved they are, that we are not in a modern society if we don't let them do what they want in the name of liberty.

And I don't only have children in mind when making the reality, I got myself too, there are many things and attitudes I don't like, that I'm tired of watching this show. That's what evil do, stretch everything to extremes and then when good say not to exaggerate there you go you are the intolerant bigot! Furthermore, the mind never stops morphing all through one's life, it doesn't "freeze" along the way, keep that in mind. In our reality homosexuals will just have to behave in the spirit, I don't particularly appreciate the style, but I'll be the first to defend them if they are in troubles. You'll realize that acting intelligently and as an adult will limit discrimination tremendously, leave love alone, don't do the jerk and show-off, or put pressure or publicize. So you will be welcomed, you're minority that is more prone to discrimination, you don't want to become a majority, doing the jealous, carrying flags, trying to spread your ways, making parades and gangs, infiltrate cultural spheres, and if Sodom city appears again you're done. The same applies to nudism, it will be under the same rules as everything else, don't publicize public nudism freely or get your photographs easily available. We care for true love, it is here that the ideal for it will take its place. These are not facet is not the priority in what we want to be proud of. So don't cry I'm discriminating, what I said applies to everything and everybody.

Game development will be more important to us than movie production, and we'll give them among the biggest rewards for their creations. No problem with trophies too, they are an excellent invention. Games are not costly for the fantastic imagination they contain, they are interactive, they are a challenge, and you learn a lot more than you think from them. I will even add that you don't need to preserve a manipulated history anymore; you have it in games now, in which you can do far better than to watch a big thing or museum stuff, even if walking through nice things is cool too.

Apart from bugs, crashes and budget woes, they are among the most well done creations that current reality produces, sure they don't compare to a space shuttle, or life, or what the UI can do or what the heck, didn't you notice how everything is beautiful? Yeah, still no, even beauty pains me lately...We'll preserve functional all computer games, but not console games (except for hand held devices), those are a tentative at PMBBD for profit and control, they'll have to be emulated. Games are games you don't need 10 different platforms with specific monopolizing parts to have them, that's the same planet and life destructing and limiting attitude as all the gadgetry production that end-up in the garbage after a few years even if there are 20 green stickers all over. There is no need for consoles, they function under the same basic architecture as computers, they are only ways for some rich gangs to profit from a temporary diversity or boost of a part, and so they all end up emulated in computers, and the price paid in production, resource and pollution is absolutely fantastic for the temporary diversity.

It is understandable that you like the kind of interface, or standard gameplay, or simplicity for playing console games, but all that will be implemented in the basis computer where if you plug such interface it will automatically switch to appropriate gaming possibilities. Next, as I already mentioned the plug in the wall will be different, it will have another hole for big net access, so move aside grandpa, unless you're too old to understand the importance of computer games, some even go so low as thinking games make killers, this reality make killers, and the killer will use whatever best tool he'll find to get the job done, like guns. We'll recycle all those phone lines and cable garments too, we're tired of this exploiting stuff! And we won't buy CD's anymore too.

All what is unnecessary pollution will be limited; we prefer having more people happy than ego materialist people that pollute like 3 making collections in nostalgia. If you want images and pub in our reality, you'll have it digitally and it will be available to everybody, forever, eternally. It will limit ego materialist people protecting jealously their collections of things for future boasting too (I'm not talking about usual objects). Collections are for museums, and they will be made global, everybody will have access to high quality, non-degrading, digitalization of them, and they'll have infinitively far more value as such than possessed by a few people who create fake value by limiting their quantity or sight. We'll have enough historical stuff of all kind to fill megaton of museums, no need for production to create unneeded markets, and I'm not talking about embellishment or decoration stuff like posters and teddy bears, I'm talking about production for collection uses specifically, like Coca Cola making a collector edition of their bottles every 5 years to make it like a culture thing, and colorful boxes of all kind for possessing people that have an orgasm looking at a pub campaign. Music is sound, not a pub campaign or a box, the same for movies and more. And sorry, you're in a different reality; people are less possessive, ego or materialist here.

And locked parental content in games is currently not competent; I don't care running around with armored magically swinging boobs and butts, but I want filter levels like information about content of porn that surely can't exist otherwise than as an incompetent stupidity presently. So, in games, you can make locked nudity levels with a different starting locked shortcut which load your games differently. With computers you can easily separate porn facets in movie too, into scenes, that way someone can skip what he doesn't like right from the start without having it from surprise making it a normal activity by getting used to it, or getting it on fast forward, we can and we will do, and it changes strictly nothing to content allright? That way porn won't be an argument, only you, by removing producers who think they should have the liberty of imposing others their "normal" sexual activities, and that can apply to normal movies too.

You can do that with any mass media content, giving back the liberty of self-consciousness development to individuals; individuals are not the mass, that's upside down, so mass media control must be in the hand of individuals, the same for judgment. So no imposed publicity, except emergency pub and event or sports logo sponsorship, to some embellishment extent (the effect is as valid as the publicity, so it is acceptable to me). And yes, it can be done, but it won't be through the Democracy-Capitalism business liberties; division, competition and profiting oblige, unless it's a government TV, like the one North Koreans have.

We want maturity in intelligence (it doesn't mean I have these things, or always), to set the censorship limit. We won't be poorly minded happy workers feeding on an entertainment dependence created by PMBBD and hype (close your screen and 3/4 of today's entertainment won't survive for lack of "spectacular"; film or photo effects and continually flabbergasted dramatizers). Some of the things you think as fun presently may not exist in life reality because many present "fun" activities are the results of problems or a wish to escape reality or suicidal tendencies or brainwash. And I don't say escaping reality should not be cool, but there's a difference between doing it because of a sick reality or out of revolt, or PMBBD and escaping for fun or entertainment.

We surely won't be a "serious" reality either, we'll have all kinds of humorists, clown and stupid people, don't worry, they are very important, particularly for people like me. No problem with lotto for adults either, we have a basis, you're independent, but you can't bet the basis credits since it is separated in different spheres of spending. Betting and credits games will be an entertainment facet for sure, but the money won't grow rich people, it will be a reality thing with some potential for cultural variations at no negative cost to the reality, the expended credits will go in the appropriate bottle, and the jackpots won't be exaggerated either, and they will be very diverse, so sorry for those who will miss their 45 000 000$ dream. I will add that the casino and lotto games problem is not only a big glamour dreamer on adrenaline thing, but it is a reflection of a mental failure of judgment too, meaning that people are not looking at the truth of reality but at a the false or hyped image of it, their judgment is not realist (happens to me all the time too...).

Current reality (as a studied phenomenon) will probably reach peak PMBBD production, entertainment and funny anti-depression stuff soon and right at the potential start of another reality, so we'll skip comparing the two realities too much there, and we'll sure thank it for the work already done. This reality didn't start with hockey teams, circus, 3D movies and divas at the ton, no, the first entertainment was very basic, something you wouldn't dare consider as entertainment. Most entertainment is excellent for our reality, but we may have to discard a big slab of it, half will be available "normally" 1/4 will be available for over around 18, and the last 1/4 may be discarded as totally inappropriate for our ways.

Intra reality Olympics with a cultural base will exist right away. All competition in sports will be done between them. The idea is that competition between cultures must exist, even a little racism is good, if put at its right place, but it must be made under as much fairness as possible, even if total fairness is impossible as even a culture difference is more appropriate for this or that. I base my judgment on Olympics which is a very racial thing, and it doesn't end in war. A little racism competition is not a bad thing, there can be good humor there too; if we ever want to be less racist we'll have to appreciate and accept more our differences. You're not good at this sport, well, you're different, isn't it why you're a different culture? Professional sports teams will be made of cultures too, people that pass a vast majority of their time in their associated culture bubbles.

Next, there will be encouragement on sex separation of sports in Olympics only, anybody can practice any sports, but for Olympic purpose, there are too many sports to double the whole kit with sexist competition. I don't like women competing against men, there will be some specific sports for men and for women as much as mixed sports, which will permit us to have more sport diversity represented at Olympics without making of it a never ending thing. Can I have paintball competitions? Paragliding? These may be available to both sexes, but as I already said, I want a slab of sports competitions that are for only one sex, even if that may be hard to judge, the tools of A&D judgment will be available for any decision making. That's how different it is in another reality and stay away if you're stupid enough to see sexism here. There are tons of sports to choose from, and I don't mean to choose them from strength, I don't care your A&D choice is to have a woman only competition of power lifting, and a man only competition of ballet dancing, if that's the choice of people. We can even mix them randomly 4 years before the event, and we will probably modify the rules of some sports to better fit our philosophy.

You will get to those medals differently too. The support of the reality will be the same for everybody who wants to become professional sportsmen. An amount of money will be available to build a solid structure for sports, proportional to closely related populations. That means any good proportion agglomeration of people will have a basic and adequate sports structure. They will mainly be connected to schools, but the bigger and more compact the population, the bigger the sports structures. For our starting city, these structures will be simply fantastic and integrated in the development and planning of the whole city.

Another reason I don't like today's Olympics, is because big rewards are given on a pure luck basis, and that's unfair. You won't be alone on that podium anymore, we'll give from 1 to 3 medals each of platinum, gold and silver, throw in some jewels for flash. We will set a limit to time precision, anybody that enters the finish line inside a 0.01 second slab gets a medal, or something like that. And that's it, since what separate them is mainly manipulations of pure luck forces (don't manipulate (influence it, limit it) luck remember? Even if gods are good at doing it. Manipulating luck factors eliminate it), like getting uniformity of preparation for a single day every 4 years while at the same time being at the peak of one's performance. At that level, only ridiculous thing like a gust of wind or fart is sufficient to separate one athlete from the other, the results you get from the best is like flipping a coin, and that's exactly how ridiculous today's Olympics are, and that says a lot about how profoundly and irreversibly in conflict we are from PMBBD overload. Is there only me that is insulted when I see medals separated by 0.01sec or a millimeter?

Professional team sports entertainment will become far less costly, think of all the costs related to it, the stadiums, the salaries, all the related people paid for it, the television shows, the production of related items. When you think globally you must think like that. I talk about realities here, I'm not separating this country or that for competition, and when I talk association, I talk about global association, with all related costs. In our reality we are capable of knowing the total costs in all relation of the police and the army to keep our systematization integrity reality wide, to the number of expended bullets full of lead polluting our lands.

And we'll have to stop referees from cheating games and deciding who win the cups, team sports game rules are already prone to interpretation and mistakes, the worst killer of sports gaming fun are referees who think they decide the game or who think their job is to try distributing the same amount of punitions both sides. They must be just and they are absolutely not in this reality, when a game is won by a millimeter, you don't put crappy referees scraping the spirit of the game by manipulating the speed of the game or emphasizing a penalty way that advantage one or the other, and that include line penalties. How is it possible that most hockey teams get the same number of violence penalties when one is evidently more violent? You're cheating the game! You see a hit, you give a penalty and that's it, whatever it is at the last minute of the game. I don't know what can be done to those referee since they control a big slab of the game, but one thing is for sure; people who represent justice are worth far worse punitive measures if they act unjustly. I say evident incompetence should not be paid for, no salary for a month and no involvement in a cup or medal race for a year, with a note on your file about it, and that's the minimum. We can judge that through an A&D group doing it after a game if people get angry. In the end, it is better having players cheating than having the rules defenders doing it, even if both are necessary. Evidently, that's an ex hockey amateur talking, the Quebec's Nordiques is my team, it is good at kicking Canadian butts...

As for drugs in sports, I don't know, I could say that since you're profit or popularity or competition crazy, it is your problem, go ahead, die of a heart attack, you know the risks. The problem is that any drug can be used, but you're independent adults no? And adults are supposed to know drugs are bad and create dependences. But no, it doesn't work like that; I already explained the reasons for a systematization to exist and create limitations, and there's an important factor that is destroying a lot presently and that we should never forget; and that is competition, and sports are made of competition, many things are, but in our reality competition is more equilibrated by self control and a true ideal with goals and simpler understanding. Yet, there is one place where its expression will always be very strong, and it is in sports. So it's a bad idea to legalize everything for this sole reason, but to add more, I must say that there are always things that are too dangerous to be available, even to adults. So forget it, dangerous drugs will be illegal as a market point.

Marihuana is ok, the tricky thing is LSD and its derivatives, there is no experience at legalizing it so it's hard to tell how people would use it, so it will be illegal except as a prescription for as long as it's stuck with the reputation that it opens consciousness and grows intelligence, we definitively don't want people running everywhere doing nothing but thinking themselves intelligent like it's a drug to inflate our ego with nothing as a constructive result, or is it the vision of ego people that predominates? People are intelligent btw, except those who only have time to cultivate the contrary...Do your psy science right and I'll reconsider (exception are people like me, if my social environment was not a bitch that get me real angry with regularity, then I believe it could be, maybe, an advantage to me specifically, taken like when I'm older and a lot calmer, there's a freaking lot of stuff in my head, a lot of old crap too (I erase a lot of old imagination as I update, there's twice as much as you read, that cumulated all along my life, and it doesn't look like it but I work to develop these failed theories and imaginations, and the further step of transforming it as I write to another language require a further concentration effort, so erasing it in text doesn't remove the work I invested in the failure, and it will linger without reinforcement for as long as it takes a positive reinforcement to bear result in reality, which is around 10 years slightly exponential; at some point you can't change anymore, except physically, your bones break and your organs fail, including your mental one, supposing you didn't get it failed long ago...(I'm talking instinctive hints, you have to understand as a first step, and reinforce as a second, you need to live the situation, fail a few times, adjust, regret, rage, all that takes time, enough that you'll lose hope, but someday you'll have identified and adjusted the limiting factors, the net that comes with what you want to change, that is stretched between your other beliefs, which is your battleground of mind conflict, and it will work a little better, but not if you unpause in front of a truck, and that little success, mister, is the most precious thing to life, depending if it's good for it evidently). Mush can be heavy metal on the soul, I'm not sure I'm an amateur, but it should be legal, who the hell takes mush to have fun on the job? Peyote doesn't have to be legal, except for people growing some among their flowers, I wouldn't touch it though, particularly while watching my favorite movie lately "Revenge"...). LSD stuff will be prescribed as an experience to better know its best place, some societies can take a mouthful as one of their science facet if they manage to gather back some serious science about it, it could be used for supervised party too, as a specific rare request, not for businesses or LSD party houses. And for which I'll add a note, it will be illegal to put dependence agents in anything, and don't implant them genetically either; we'll make the emphasis on growing clean and complete products, you can have some variations in properties, that's normal, but no pressure selection for always purer THC or nicotine stuff, and all plants will imperatively have to be studies for all possible effects on life, we may discover 100 more extremely potent agent of whatever the fuck, maybe even an aphrodisiac like chocolate, so move your ass, this is the life reality, and plants are in it all the way.

As you can see, you must not be scared to change the way things work if it satisfies the logic of our ideal. For another example of the fantastic changes that can be acceptable with enough arguments, even such a ridiculous thing as cake placements can be displaced in our reality. I'm not dictating the use of cakes for sure, but they could be suited in association to Olympics too, it fits competitive people running for the reward of their life since competition is mostly meant for fun, and a cake is fun too, but we're not made to make an indigestion of fun, moderation and good association is best. I associate cakes to some ego in this book, so, after heavy physical and mental energy investment, you're worth a good ego boost; Olympic sportsmen invest a lot of themselves to give us a moment of elation, and Olympic athletes for most are not rich professional sportsmen, they have a perfection passion and don't always have a worthy reward for their efforts, and I don't care about boosts and steroids, that's part of their game, for me there are no "clean" athletes and if I'd be one, I wouldn't be "clean", but I'd be careful. My problem is that such things are extremely dangerous, adults under professional training and under the supervision of doctors is all-right to me, but how would you stop an innocent under hype, pub and PMBBD influences taking boosters? You wouldn't do better than this reality.

The good fun, competition and ego association can place the cake there (ego under its two forms, basic survival ego for food and family, and reward ego too for cake, taste, sight). Now, no need to finish planting deathly exhausted runners in a cake, maybe some, I don't know where or how to involve cakes, and I'm just having fun with unchangeable things in this reality. Maybe a few prepared events or even a big final competition of winners with some "caky" elements in it. As for the flame, we could make a competition out of it, it would be big no? Then plant the torch in a cake? But too much cake is no better than not enough...

I would tend to say half people would think it's too weird, but it was just an example of things that can change with enough argumentation, as for the word "cake", like "love" and "like" there are such short beautiful words that show some idealist vision, we should take care of them, at least; the first who invent such words had the spirit (spirit too), but forgotten in insignificance by the size of the important people of history, those same that will twist such words for profiting. Yet, they show that the truly good people are not where we look with our eyes but where we look in our heart. The good of such an insignificant thing is greater than we want to imagine, but in this reality a cake can become a shit in the most twisted mouth; a shit can then become a rose, and that's what I hate, because while you have to do it a little to emphasizes something or better express a feeling, a lot to generate humor too, that I see as stretching the elastic some, it's again the extremes where people end-up relating immediately the image to the signification, word manipulators with a mouth full of shit they psychologically had to cover it up with a rose, spreading their twisted thinking to masses, a "rose" is a beautiful short word, as a "cake", and both have nothing to do with shit (except that every plant can recycle and do something constructive with shit nutriments). To have a semblant of saving the face, you could explain the twisted relation by saying you eat the cake to give the shit to grow the rose, but the problem here is that you just said shit in the right association, so you're twisted. And you can't eat anything, the cake is out of the association equation, food is the true association; I could say, to make it worst in your unconscious mess you think poetic that you eat shit to shit and to grow shit? But people can make the association they want, who am I? But you'll go at school to learn a language, which exist in big part for exactly this reason; limit free for all associations in languages that degenerate them, and the human too...

Love now. No other reality if you aint got a straight definition of love. Either that or we invent another word for the truth of love. I don't want a reality without love, so that's our only 2 options, we must choose one. My opinion is that love is not working because this reality's vision put it everywhere, in every sentence for anything anyhow and whatever. I don't know what love is for Japanese, Arabs and Chinese, but if someone actually proves me Japanese culture do exist, then we'll have love my way here. Current love vision is an old (new) development, with priests spreading "love" while they never loved in the truth of it, but I don't believe the reality made of love is totally consciously bad. Meaning the initial intention is flabbergastingly bad from the incomprehension necessary, but the transformation made to it, if we get true love out of the equation, is not bad, with a good push (effort from good willing people), it but that is just the initial spark, current reality reflects very poorly that that true love is working; is true love bullshit? For now love is only a different word among many that is a synonym of strong liking or affection, compassion, admiration, go ahead, add some, it's a definition like anything else that doesn't mean something particularly exceptional.

This reality's love is filling a multi billions people using it at all sauces spot, we'll try to limit that a little, and a big part can be done with people talking to masses being careful, and writers too, that may be sufficient when added to other love facets. I do, and it's easy, liking for me is absolutely different than loving, but I'm alone doing it while nobody cares because people have become like that, they are like this and like that, ask psy scientists...and the main culprits are profiteers like religions, singers, sex people, and publicists, particularly publicists. I bet the use we make of it is wrong way 90% of the time, around 10% will live a valid scenario in reality, we'll have to do better than that to impress life.

So I believe a lot will depend to what extent people are ready to go and the strength of their will. Self-motivated people know how to behave, their standard is higher and their ideals are stronger, and I'm somewhat of an example; if you ask them to be careful with love with good reasons, they will, and that may change everything if a few generations do it in totality. Reading what I wrote about life, you understand the importance of it to me? You understand that I care for it? Did I ever used love to boost my attachment to it? No, I used understanding, care, appreciation, liking; I'm sure I never said I love it. People who throw love everywhere are unconscious of what they're saying, and I know that you're not supposed to think seriously of every words you're saying, we'd go crazy doing it, yet, there is always a minimum of effort done to create the ways of languages, everybody does it to some extent as everybody take great care of talking somewhat differently, there are words that we like to use more than others, use differently too, love should be the word we care the most for, not the less cared for word the earth over; if there is a single word we should think before using, it is that one. But maybe I'm wrong, I guess it's more important to be careful of swearing...

High consciousness is under a natural self drive, but it means we are not good alone without a systematization for some limitations, since you start as innocent, and one of the areas where you need to do it is with languages, languages are not made of laws for nothing, and the result of not controlling a language well can degenerate all king of human aspects, as they build themselves a flawed personality. Maybe we'll have to make more of an emphasis on word integrity at school than perfect grammar and punctuation.

10% of love, probably less, is used with all the good it means in the right context and in truth, and that's the worth of true love in this reality. Each time I use love between quotation marks (""), it means I'm into sarcasm.

The ideal would be for father reality to work with us, but it the one that diluted love to insignificance. For now I decide, and I say that we'll just accept its use to positive associations with the loving scenario of 2 people. We'll not use it outside that, meaning the use of it will always be associated to true love. Any permanent media that don't care using it wrongly will be scorned, people will have the right to slap them on the mouth when they take a jog in the morning. That will apply to a movie where someone says that he "love" something instead of liking it, the same for books, the same for a television person that is not careful, and he will lose his job with the public if he doesn't care about love, whatever the admiration level, love is our sacred word.

And by the way, all our communication will be categorized as such; no manipulators with bad credibility will influence anything not adult, and nobody not adult will access adult stuff. As for controlling your urge to talk dirty or twist words, don't think that's impossible to do; Quebeckers have a list of words we never say in public. We can do it with love too, we just have not to let people like publicists throw it everywhere for profits or popularity or manipulation. And we can easily make the difference between someone making a mistake and someone not caring, publicly. No competition of love desecrators against the true lovers in our reality, you will not use love to hate, you will not use it to describe your appreciation of something external to true love. Saying you "like very much" instead is not that hard, why does this word exist if you don't use it in its right way? People got all kind of sacred things, for us, love will be our sacred word; it is the word you'll respect the meaning of the most.

Add an adjective if you want to express liking something still more strongly, saying you absolutely like it is perfect, there are many options, but in our reality, we'll emphasis its use associated to people loving each other, you can say you love the hands of your partner if you want, that he or she is lovely, anything, as long as it is associated to true love.

Evidently I make a little special for love. Cultures can have the liberty of trying to control their language, as they always did, but we could squarely decide public stuff at the mass, done through an A&D group. Every culture could make a list of associations they don't want public people to make too, with limited punitive means to help their way, like making a list of language aberrations and someone that get recorded saying those in public may carry a note in their personal file about it as a punition ladder from accumulation. And I say public, you can say what you want at home, even between some friends, public mean there are many people you don't know watching or listening. For each one that get filmed, or easily proven, the person have to keep the number in his file, categorized by age, to remove one you got to pay a fee, or you may be removed one every year, but if you grow the list too much you lose the liberty to use some tools of communication with masses.

That could be a way to try limiting people spreading serious negative associations in language, mainly against races or people, like stupid anal or animal associations. But I'd limit that to when used against people or when desecrating love and to associations that really don't make sense. Stupid is stupid, shit is shit, you don't have to call it excrement, one or the other is no better, but the wrong association is to call it "roses" or a cake; that doesn't make sense, except for some forms of artists. And nothing wrong with "bullshit", there are good association of bad sounding words associated to bad attitudes. Yet, as I'll later describe the importance of languages for developing different humans, cultures will control their language themselves, and their efforts will eventually be reflected, maybe not in the way they think, in their people of the future. Still, the word to remember here is "public", this effort is generally made for many words presently, i bit like for fucking, not that the effort is successful so well it's implanted everywhere.

But no need to make a paranoia about every word being spoken, I think most people can understand my point of view, I'm not providing you a list of words to eliminate, I don't like to be told I don't have the right to say "dick" or "cunt" (sexy word, who made it bad?) "bullshit" or "fuck" (why, it's just doing the sex thing), "cunt" makes me a little too horny so maybe we're as well keep that one personal (I did write it twice didn't I?).

So, since evil will always try to twist principles to manipulate around, we'll have to further emphasis with a further word on liberty that has lost much of its shine at the hands of manipulators too, but I believe people will eventually stop throwing conflicting liberty everywhere by themselves. I still like things at their best place, if you want total liberty, then I should have total liberty too, as a matter of fact, maybe a better way to see it would be to place liberty on an equilibrium line; the line is drawn from good principles and if you want the liberty to use PMBBD on masses, then you lose liberty proportionally elsewhere, credit removal can be seen as liberty loss, but there are many other options, like losing some protection from the system, but I still prefer fight fire with fire, and that can be losing the liberty to use mass communication channels facets.

Since we will have many mass communication facets, just like father reality got twitter or facebook, they may be associated to levels of liberty, talking to a few friends or by telephone can be seen as 100% liberty, books can be seen 90% liberty since you are better categorize them to limit some people from accessing some, like hardcore porno books or twisted vampire love books. Something like twitter can be seen in the same optic, almost total liberty, but that's the limit to me, all other communication channels reaching ultra massive level should spread stuff professionally by the most exemplary people; that's where liberty must be limited the most.

So, if you want to say you love farting, you can do it on a system like twitter in our reality, but you won't have the liberty of doing it on professionally controlled communication structures, but even if you do it, as I already said, we won't kill you, a mistake is a mistake, forget it, but not caring will get you a mention in your file or loss of liberty somewhere, and if you persist with the evident intent of spreading a different view than the good one, you'll lose that liberty.

We can associate admiration at a more appropriate place, even if this word can be used for anybody, but we could protect its use for people, not objects. And veneration could be better with life. And I know those are for the ego-gods ideal and religions, but it will have a hard time thriving in our reality and we need the strongest qualificatives and cutest words to complement love.

As always without going extreme, you'll admire your partner, this person that you see everyday and who admire you too, you'll idealize him even if he's not, you did it for "gods" showing their best facets temporarily in manipulation over-hype in ego reality, then you'll do it for the person that is not scared to show you all his facets through time in our reality. Furthermore, you won't like attitudes from a boss or singer you wouldn't like from your partner, and that doesn't stop you to work for someone you don't like.

All the most significative words are under the same kind of pressures as love, and don't think it will suddenly stop there, in a thousand years you'll have words you never thought would come to mean something else, when the hype version of love will not be enough for "gods", fuck all free for all libertine people and manipulators will start to admire and venerate cars, yogurt, everything and anything for an added effect. We are not a reality of gods, but one of life, that's the entity we'll venerate openly, and no problem with worshipping places, but I'm not an expert at that, some seriously converted priests of this reality may help, probably not, I'll try to visualize something. And you don't have to brainwash yourself using admiration or love every five minutes, you'll get contrary results in the end, you express such words mostly like kisses, passing your time kissing is not very productive, and kisses are not love, the same for the love words; they are not love.

That's a plus for English as an international language you know; the difference exists as more evident and can be easily used, and that makes it a "better" language on that facet. You can say "like" which is beautiful, and you can say "love" which is supreme, such words are absolutely perfect, and yes it may be tempting to use love everywhere, but both are very different things.5/8

I'll add that since adoration is associated to the ego-gods ideal, we'll be better using the word where it can have the best effect for us; on children, a suggestion for public people, or an emphasis, to replace the love association with children by adoration and remove the association of adoration to religions since we'll have far less people kneeling and licking boots with their anus higher than their head, and we are better doing it fast before current public people make crap with it and start adoring peanuts cars and cities.

As for a cute word concerning people you particularly appreciate, stronger than liking, it seems my "prayers" were answered as I woke up this morning with the right one (I'm surprised when that happens with precise things like that, in fact, adoration placement with children came straight from a dream I made too, not that it's an extraordinary spark of genius that I got from the 7'th depth of understanding, but that's weird). So, as a synonym of strong liking of people we have cherish, there can be all kind of people you cherish, and the word is cute, simple, lasting, sensible and powerful. Now, you know we are better without creating too much of a hype effect, for lasting power, so no rave of "love". Raves in our reality will be out of sex and love pressures, drugs permitted for adults as long as it is not marketed. Again is an attitude thing, I want sexy women dancing on speakers, but not as the main emphasis of everything while the singer shouts sex.

So no hype, only a "straight" definition which won't be twisted, and after some thinking, to do the evil dictator of love, I'll say that I see nothing wrong if it's part of the gift system. Sex includes oral sex by the way, maybe that should close the mouth of sex scientists who say it is a genetic thing or a hormonal-pheromone thing; beyond the genetic of sex attraction it's a decision, a brain thing (or lack of) from you or from pressures or from PMBBD, and what is this pheromonal thing anyway? Some kind of new placebo perfume that sends women rutting? Isn't pheromones simply smells used by insects for communication? Instead of saying I want to reproduce, they smell something because that's how they talk? Because I don't know how, but my imagination must generate a lot of the stuff...

We want the first people of the life reality as exemplary people, so no Don-Juan Rock Star extreme come make their show here, we'll produce our own. People who had sex like a therapy and eventually settle for a stable partner will say they are "settled", and no problem there, but the "infinite love" philosophy ends here. I'm always talking mass effects, and while like any liar or manipulator can say you fell in love after a hundred "tentative" or "trips a 3", you don't pass love test if you've had it with a hundred people is what I say, and I mean women too, no discrimination, if a man had sex with 100 women, there got to be 100 women who had sex too... I should add that all this love thing concerns solely international (reality) language, English or French for now, cultural languages do what they want.

We want people who still got some love potential if we are to help ourselves, we want people who care, who still got that "unconscious understanding" of the path of love, and who try to follow it or respect it. Even if I don't know why, I believe I'm right on the spot for many people about that, are they getting the push they need? If our vision of love change or get contorted, it is the path of our reality, we'll do it ourselves. We want people who have defended love some, and not because they are ugly and didn't have their candy, I'm talking people who tried to act good, who had sex and love principles, we don't want hyped fakers.

And that will apply to many singers and "super" "stars" or crooners, or fuck "stars", prostitutes (escorts), or whatever, your whole lot has nothing to do here, you've desecrated love beyond all frontiers and we don't want singers for the fuck dream, and their groupies who dream of being fucked backstage. Vampires too, we catch you, we break your teeth, I'm talking children and adolescents here, adults can watch cute guys vampire "love", if that's what makes them horny...

And it's not just a question of love, that's the same kind of attitude that get people to kneel in front of their god in religious indoctrination institutes, except the priest is the singer distributing his good parole, and that's the same kind of attitude that will get people's ass over their head if aliens come here; you'll want to fuck with them because you think you love them. That's in big part why we do this new reality, to be rid of libertine people who believe they can do anything they want at the cost of other people's liberties or the twisting of their minds, read that over, who see interdiction as temptation in their competitive liberty that they do what they want unless authority with guns stop them, such people are a plague and don't care about the future of humanity, and they're one of the main cause of this hell.

And that's why you may be better start right now fighting sex maniacs with a pseudo brain any hormone can overwhelm or who got it twisted final enough to see interdiction that make sense as a competition to succeed at doing the smart ass. And don't tell me I understand nothing to the human, that it is like this and like that, am I human or not? The new reality exists to be rid of that selection, we are mature civilized adults not children that need to be constantly watched upon by god.

I repeat that you do what you want in your personal activities, we won't have a "police" of love (we may if people don't care), I'm talking mass effects, skip qualifying anything as love to masses, love is love, you can invent yourself another word, and make an effort better than me for words, because in our reality, we won't want to see those people who act civilized being seen negatively because they don't fit our version of love, call it "settling" or "sexual affection" if you want, if you finally find or choose someone satisfying after trying so many partners, or invent yourself a new word without exploiting love associations.

And that doesn't mean that sexual "evolutions" of words associations to feelings and emotions within sexuality must or will be lost, there is always a best path, we want to keep sexuality personal, but we want to stay realist, all those words we invented and that we use in sexuality, dirty words, crazy associations, they are not meant to disappear, they are meant to be expressed at their best associated feeling or emotions, and now how do you learn this stuff? Somebody have an idea? You can go to a certain point with imagination, but the good tools and useful and good things you cumulated through time must be transmitted, give fuel to imagination, but you know you must not exaggerate there, it is where thing slip in evil; pushing the envelope, trying to embark everybody.

So your child may meet these words, you can tell them different things like what I already explained in the "Love entanglement" chapter about others people inventing or saying stupid things, that they are sex related and that you'll eventually know by yourself, no need to think about sex for now. Eventually as sexuality starts, there will be some basic notions of mutual respect, minimally, and they'll do their things until they become young adults. At that point, you need a secure, under cloth, way to permit the person to have limited examples, and I believe that can be achieved with BD, books and movies, maybe even normal porn of young adults. Since schools seem unable to deal with the subject, and since it is understandable that not everybody wants an invading teacher or parents on the matter. Some books could help too, I visited a Quebecker book showcase lately to get some information about publishers, and I read a few pages from the "oseras-tu?" set of books, some seem good for the garbage, but the ones for younger people seems excellent.

As for possible use of sex movies for education purpose, I'm not sure it's a good idea, or maybe I should better explain how I would see the possibility. First I sure don't see it as an industry or market, so I wouldn't make a million of them... and no sensual stuff of women rubbing against one man after the other, and not 80's stuff, make an effort, you can make quality production; some sensuality, some erotism, caresses, sex, the whole kit appropriate to age (start at around 16, as an example at which age they're supposed to think about that more seriously, and don't worry, I know they're never young enough to start for this reality, if only they could erotize babies...) and without a pointing teacher, just a normal cute movies, never twice the same actors, nothing disgraceful, no insulting, etc. You provide the saner path, SANER, and you don't show that with the biggest dick of the world competition, or the dickhead that fucked the vastest quantity of prostitutes competition, or an army of rich schtroumfs on Viagra and ecstasy passing over the same woman or young people.

And you don't impose; you make available, you don't drop the tape on the table and wait; it's their thing, it is available if they really want it, and you can even tell them such a thing will be available to them when they'll be around 15 to make them understand that they don't have to panic about it, and they can skip it all their life no problem, parenthood can definitively have an influence there. At adulthood you let the person continue on its own agenda without pressures except to control pressures against the fundamental basis, so religious activities and people into zoologism can be watched by people who like these things, but give access to it to young people and you lose availability, do it again and it is automatic loss of citizenship (no personal file and no protection from any system).

These are options, you can show things with boring books too, where things are shown as instructions, machinal, optimal, like a first aid course, with a mannequin for practice...(that was humor, ok?)

And we want no proud sex revolutionized people too, and I'm talking specifically of those boasting and complaining and dictating around, they systemized competition at the most ridiculous totality of scale, even between generations so deep in it they are, their own children. There's this mentality from the 60-70 era like Christianity regurgitated love in a mess, and everybody jumped on it to get an aftertaste, people profited from every evolutionary facets for self-interest or give credit to their sex trip in the name of "love", while they still boast around no end about how good they were, they even invented sex and love, but I say they have finalized this reality for themselves, so they better stay in it.

I'm harsh because I know they'll try to take the credit for anything good that will be made since they're not dead. But I won't let them take the credit for the life reality, and if they competition younger people again then we'll do nothing, we'll let their superiority reach its truth, in their version of "peace" and "love", the degeneration of humanity in war and hate...The life reality is a tentative at repairing all the wrongs that arose from old twisted philosophies. It will be the end of this childish competition of generation, all generations are heroic in their own way, to tough the troubles of the previous one minimally...

So don't come at me saying I'm continuing your work because I talk about love, peace, flower cities, fairness, the environment, life, I read no nomenclature on nothing, surely not on hippies, but maybe I'm redoing the work they messed-up though, that could fit... Everybody on earth know these things are important, 60-70 sex "philosophers" on drugs didn't invent something new, the same for sex and love, I could say the made scrap with all these things though, they profited from them to the maximum possible, and their ego party lead in big part to the present situation, whatever they sing how good they were, and then they'll be jealous? I don't want a single of those old sex people to come give me a single counsel, particularly about love or sexuality, they've talked about it enough already, my turn, and I say they are not an example to follow, and I don't want them to take credit for people trying to get out of the brothel they made, and that applies to all those old illuminated emotive artists sex weirdoes we never end seeing everywhere, which are listened to like gods, and all their twisted philosophers too. Sexuality evolves with more comfort, tech and education, and less religious involvement for sure too, and less competition. We will have far more (or better) sex simply because of the basis principle, technology will be intrinsic to people, far more people will live comfortably without stress hassles, and competition will be limited, added to that we'll excel at true love. No need for sex revolutionaries to profit from it, or take credit for the 69, or twist the natural process to their own desires.

Even if we live true love at a majority scale, it may still take a thousand years to start showing its real value, me, I just need to open an eye for 5 minutes to believe it is indispensable to humanity. And I have no choice to generalize, just know that I take the means to reach my ends, there are all kind of exceptional older people, but it is the way of this reality that they are not the ones I hear about, tranquil people are not appreciated, the most appreciated and admired people are manipulators or extroverts.

So our emphasis and basis will be for true love, your sexual activities are personal beyond that as long as you don't push masses to your ways. And that won't stop us having tons of sex fun, but we'll have love too, by skipping this continually publicized sex party pressure for admiration. Still, there will be loads of troubles; love is not always a flower garden with a levitating couple on it, and that doesn't help the jealous people who tend to double or triple idealize it, who think it's extraordinary, while completely ignoring that time can takes its tool and test love.

Abortion will always be an option for women, and I say women, they can discuss it with men, but men don't decide about it in the end except to leave, men don't grow babies and women are the life giver and they are supposed to be the one to have better judgment if love exists in a fashion as to build a family from it, even if they lost most of that judgment from what I hear around...That doesn't mean women should impose things, personally, if my love came to me and suddenly said she is pregnant, I'd flush her right away whatever I want a child or not, I see a child as wanted by both parents before conception, we're not a tribe of savages, we are civilized. Not following this rule is a proof of a grave lack of respect both to the child and me, it is hardly a proof that we are driven by true love...

Our way of reproduction emphasis, particularly with the importance we give to true love, will result in a lower birthrate ratio, and that will help the earth and wild life, they needs a break, since we are trice too many; birth rate must not even sustain itself, it must get lower, crashing the whole economy with it if it was too full of self-important expertise to realize there can't be an infinity of people or resources, that an economy based on exponential growth can't exist forever.

Now, if women have become beauty objects on sale or have lost all notions of a lasting loving relation, then to hell with it, I abandon; no need to try another reality without love as women on full ego are the most costly things that can walk this earth. But don't worry there are still many loving women, many that dream of it and many deceived ones too. Just don't forget love begin by oneself, if you eat too much or never exercise, your prayers of love will have a far harder time getting real. It can be somewhat of a reflection of a twisted ego too, since you want to be in love while not caring to be lovely for the other. All this while love transforms as we get older, and you get excited by younger or sexier bodies, nothing wrong with that, it's the young body as a competition ground that's wrong, so is the destruction of love for the sex facet.

If you die with money, it will be put back in the bottle, or diluted, unless you were living in love. True love will be the only exception to that, and it will have to be proven through a long time attachment, more than 3 years before 50. We'll say that marriage was on the right track, whatever the "no sex before marriage" was wrong, the same with the speeches about being condemned to it to death, and all the religious relations in fact.

I don't have to say you don't have to form a family to be in love, but to form one you'll have to prove an attachment for 2 years or more, we want as many kids as possible to start under this scenario, but as an adult, and you'll have the possibility for adopting children too; just no homosexuals, prostitutes, drug addict and the likes at it. And we will control birthrate, I even think it will go smoothly, since our people will just have more of a mentality to do things well. One way or the other we fill the space, maybe less people, but we'll have the capacity to do things far better and more fairly, prevent some grave sickness that may put humanity at risk too, and it will permit us to prevent overpopulation directly, and the result will be the same; the earth will bear as much people as it can contain in sense, with those advantages a high consciousness specie can't do without.

Personally that's been one of my first problem of consciousness, I had this idea that I had everything, that everything was for me, so sure, I'll do a family, when I'll be back from the army, because I can't lose my mind here anymore tolerate this waiting, this feeling that everything is in the way, that everything is wrong, let's go battle the enemy, I'm already frustrated and stressed to the bones, I'm ready to set the dump on fire...Then, after I regained my breath, things made worse sense than ever! How could I make more people if the reality seems to be a handicap to the reasons why I would do it? How could I bring more people to this planet with already twice too many? What of country competition? My genetics? Gotta do something before other people make babies at the chain or by accident, that they starve, live in misery or violence... No, I saw this as the proof that things worked wrong, and I would not contribute this, I would fight it, if only by my power of doing nothing. But maybe I'm still on my initial vision, what if I'm truly living the perfect life? What if that's the necessary form my life had to take to be exemplary in this reality? Maybe in 10 years I'll end-up saying that I'm living the most extraordinary life, and that this moment was part of my apprenticing, maybe I'll even fall in love and make babies in the future; what if I had to change the world to be what I wanted to be? Unfortunately, time and experience would prove my continual lack of judgment on self-happiness matters, so who am I to suppose I got something that could make people and life happier?

After around 3 years together, baby or not, the couple, without the children, will be seen as a somewhat successful creation of a new entity composed of a male and a female acting complementarily as an example of an ideal base, and this will be automatic, the central computer will detect or deduct it, with some repeated proofs, and one day you'll receive a bundle of random flowers; it doesn't mean you're married, it only mean someone is happy and hoping things will last.

So, whatever it is love at first sight or you see it everywhere, only then will you fulfill the grand definition of it, no problem with marriage if you don't do it at the chain, and I personally think homosexuals should leave that alone, if just to embark in the spirit (graciousness). We'll help make it the day of your life, and no need to make it a white overload, I'm allergic, no exaggeration but the basic idea stands; you make a ceremony and some representative of the ideal can make a speech that makes sense.

Society will provide a maximum of options as you design your day, all the way to public marriages (I didn't say bulk marriages, but the thing monarchy is so good at doing), every month a different cultural society will select randomly from a pool of its love candidates to live their version of marriage, you're picked only once evidently, never exaggerate, so some limitation will exist, even if a little competition is cool, but no rewards; just the top marriage in sense a culture can provide.

From now on you will have access to a different level of complexity associated to it where 2 people can be seen as one. You will be given more advantages than others and a certain level of dependence toward the loved person will be increasingly permitted with time. For a start, some gift choice could be specific to loving couples every years and the quality of them could increase with the time the couple have been together.

Cultures will deal with their own birthrate, but for the start of the reality, birthing permits will be given randomly, in vitro reproduction will solely be used with the sperm of the father, or a random system may be acceptable; you ask for it and you get a permit for 3 years, if you can't give birth within that time, then you can put your name back on the list for a new chance. We don't want to reproduce too much and we want love, if you don't want such a reality there's another one where you can compete, you won't competition love here, and if you want to give advantages to others (a part of your influence on the selection process beyond reproduction), you'll do it while alive.

Once you die, only love will permit the transfer of your stuff or money, so if you want to be "generous" you'll have to do it while alive, the dead can't be generous, and I could add that one in the list of arguments for a reality that doesn't make sense, and impossible to get rid now that it's a system. Who thought about that one? No family dynasty, your money and your successes are yours, not other's; you want to give a better chance to your children? Do it while alive, and make a paradise!

So there won't be testaments as we know them presently; when you die, everything is bottled back, unless you're still not dead, but handicapped from losing a part that was justly made critical to you, you are still living through someone else that shared a big part of your history. Only true love can permit 2 people to exist as one, the death of one part doesn't necessarily mean the death of the whole and that's why everything of that missing part will be transferred to the other; in true love we come to know the other by heart is what I mean. But you can't transfer to your children, think about it then forget it, doesn't make sense. Oh, and your lifelong cumulated life value is still subtracted from the bottle now that you're dead; this concerns objects and personal gains.

Now, I'm not idealist to the point of believing some children won't be thorn between separated parents, but we'll want a minimum of that, I personally experienced it and it broke something in me, I preferred my parents full of problems than separated, I felt everybody lost something, both my parents became smaller, and whatever they were hard with me, that was the hardest part to me, but they came back together. That is to tell you how important a lasting family is; if you'd ask me to go back in time, I'd trade wellbeing to have both my parents, but that is to say I've never seen them fight physically, and there was not too much hysteria; my father worked so hard anyway... It's a shame I don't want them in my life anymore, I tried, repetitively, it almost worked, but I'm done. That situation of parenthood stability goes hand in hand with love, whatever the difficulties in the couple, if the reality does its part to help relations will last longer, and someone like me would have been happier, for my whole life at it.

We'll need to care for some childhood situations better than the way this reality does, the current system is too incompetent with child in difficulties, a lot of them self-supposed professionals, are frustrated power-trip people who have strictly no notion of true love, and they play in people's lives like they possess family business judgment, I'm generalizing, but the attitude doesn't only concern children, I lived poorly all my life, and I witnessed the incompetence, not only from my personal experience, but from the experience of some people I knew that worked in the domain, and the childhood stories I heard of some people who fell victims to their decisions when I lived in a place that used their difficulties to make big money. But I suppose what counts is the image they project on TV, where they sure find the best representative of any psy profession for their show, even if they still are incompetent (not that I would be personally better, but I'm no paid professional, and I believe a far better result can be achieved for a vast majority of people in difficulties, often the result of crap reality). The current system is incompetent in too many of its decisions, fat matron wearing t-shirts of girl power are stripping people of their children at any sign or complaint fitting their judgment of a problem worth taking the children away to send him through a suite of worse than the original people, a lot of which end-up in the streets or as prostitutes, I sometime wonder if they could be corrupt to the point of sending children to people who pay enough money, you could even have a trade market this way, where problematic children disappear...And how in hell can a pedo psy superior and well paid expertise, end-up distributing children to homosexual couples anyways? Even if they somewhat get an acceptable result on 2, the same would apply if they left the children in trouble in the original situation. They're too costly for the effect, inefficient and incompetent too, even if they may prevent a lot of infanticides in hell and they do watch if kids are nourished or not raped in hell, you never know...an opportunity for a pub stunt? I'm exaggerating, and there are good ones, they're an expertise we'll need since this kind of structuring must exist one way or the other, kids get beaten in paradise too, even if there will be a lot less of their need by our love emphasis and the ways of the reality. There will be the learning institutions ways that will help couples free themselves a little more too, if they want, as I explained earlier, these places will start caring and educating children very young, and there are excellent example of very well made structuring for that presently, but it is not a responsibility dump.

We'll want the best options for children alone in difficulties, if one is found the priority will again be for loving couples, those who will have troubles making children. But since you're in a good reality the children could even be raised by mass parenthood, that can take some experimental forms, but you wouldn't do that in this reality as a hypocrite selection and competition toward some obscure unconscious goals would take place, just by the way the people do their job. Evidently, there are other ways possible, but the ways of reality shouldn't put them in a hellish situation.

Now I won't suppose dependences can or will be eliminated, that's impossible and you'd quickly end up as not much of anything as an evolved civilization since all kind of dependences are necessary to the good working of it. You can be dependent of other specialties in a work environment among many examples, but a facet is that some dependences are needed proportionally to the problems of the reality and of the person, including division and conflicting thought, and that is for humans only. Dependence in unconscious animals tend toward infinity, they have enough of a big problem just to survive I could say, so that totally mix things up.

Yet, when seen globally, or as a reality notion, I can make the affirmation that the tangent of global dependence is a hint of where a civilization is headed; a civilization that gains too much or too many "bad", or unnecessary, dependence over time is a civilization that is getting in troubles. A temporary subersault of bad dependence is one thing, a steady increase is another, a good society should come to control well its dependences; it may even stop fearing the evidently bad ones. We will be living in a reality that will seek to minimize external pressures, not maximize them to create dependences, we will even criminalize pressure if it is evident, as pressures exist mainly to manipulate and create unwanted dependences. So that's something we will try to minimize (dependences that have no use except reducing the human).

And don't mistake independence with liberty, even if both must work under limitations for a good systematization of reality. Total independence is impossible, but we are not animals, we are high consciousness humans and one of the reasons we are is because we can be almost totally independent, in evil theory, with loads of time, an infinity of it, to become "god". Love for us will be a dependence we'll encourage. So you understand that this dependence-independence thing, even if it got straight principles to it, will always stay a vague and malleable; humans must continually weight dependences effects.

Our functioning, health, wellbeing and survival is dependent on a certain number of associated people, but they must be able to act independently as much as possible since the systematization is a human thing. To make projects that require high dependence to other specialties we need a systematization permitting people to work associated as a civilization, but the systematization must be able to let people "fall back" without ending up in poverty and dependences of all kind. So the ideal is for the systematization itself to be able to morph without putting people in problems, they are not supposed to end up in misery or die if the systematization changes or takes a hit, but that is of no concern to this reality that cultivates misery and lodging problems as a systematization of philanthropy...

That means people must have the necessary skills to act independently as much as in association at any level. That's the ideal, but in truth there is always a level of dependence in everything, but the worst situation is for everybody to be interdependent at a high level, missing many independence skills. Still worst is an inappropriate population with a wrong philosophy or systematization based on predictability of fluctuations through a high momentum unidirectional steer-unable stuff, I forgot where I was going with that, but I mean, you try as much as you can not to raise a condemned interdependent population from bad philosophy, worse, squarely illogic, and then boast it as the best or good or ideal, while indoctrinating people with PMBBD pressures, or pressuring them to behave with police and army, making a heavy pressure selection while giving birth to too many people and making wars. In such a scenario, as time advances everything becomes a battle to keep going until you start losing efficiency even at pushing problems back, then you're in for a slow chain reaction that will cause massive death in the interdependent population, which can start from any globally pushed back or ignored or tolerated and accepted problem.

Interdependent specialization is supposed to be a reality morphing tool, like civilization is a tool, and they both work toward giving us independence in association. Even if it may take a million years and tons of technology to reduce the dependence, in the end, we're all supposed to end up as Adam and Eve, doing nudism in a reality where the materialization of knowledge eliminates the need for interdependence to other human beings; anybody can be a plane pilot, just push "autopilot"! Want to land? Point your finger at a landing strip on a map.

Evidently, we cannot reach its total ultimate form, we advance toward it forever, and the worst way to do things is to create dependence for fun. And that's the vision to use to judge things and take decisions; we must seek to minimize dependence from other people with ease of doing things while still being able to associate to do anything. You want your opinion to have value, you want to tell your opinion on subjects that concern you, and you want to do it so easily you just push a button. The materialization of knowledge can do that, even if it is always dependent from associated independent people behind.

You minimize all kind of unnecessary interdependences to other people, and that gives more efficiency to reality and more liberty to people, until one day all you have to do is having the liberty of doing any activities you like, while having push button or point finger power. But you still got the liberty to do things manually, so the basis must permit people to always be versatile, they must always be able to react to unpredictable situations, and keep their mind as capable of learning as possible.

You don't program a computer then lose the ability to modify what was done. In the end, as a civilization, you must be independent of whatever dependence you created and that applies to dependence to materialization of knowledge, that's why there will always be work to do and efforts to be made to learn things; there is no use being human if there is nothing to do, we don't exist to have orgasms or fun, you're better dead, learn a basis and find something to do, there is always something to do and that's our responsibility to do it, and since there is always something to do, we can always make things to do less, but there's still always something to do, and that can be to always know what to do when the things we made stop doing, or can do things better.

We are the only species that can see that unattainable extent, it's there and we know so we can't ignore and we must do like we are supposed to do in logic; try to attain it to the best of our abilities. We should try to have that view with the "bad" dependences too, the good side of some bad dependencies can help in some situations, I personally have strong and medium and small dependences that I know are bad, caffeine can be seen as a civilization building or morphing tool or a booster. Evidently, extreme drugs are never good, except to destroy stuff because the temporary positive effect is totally overwhelmed by its negative effect over time. But the principle I was trying to pinpoint is that if we are already top dependent from the needs of the reality, and if we add more to survive it, endure it, escape it (in part due to conflicts in the mind), that power won't be available. Yet, there are always exceptions, all reality is an interdependent machination, so I'm just fooling around a little.

The play of independence and dependence is quite variable too, and both can tend toward infinity, they are in big part what defines us. In a sense, the needs for independence is to learn and gain pride in what make us exceptional, these things on which we invest our energy differently, which is strongly related to individuality, while the dependence aspect is more social related, a skill too, and it is where we'll want to be reassured if we don't go too far with our independence thing by showing what makes us different. Evidently, without a mirror you got to compare a lot, and in a direct survival situation that means you'll start the ego ideology, which is allright, for some time...

Anyway, nothing will stop you from being dependent in life reality, we'll just be careful with it, we surely won't get innocence to be dependent as a goal, that's fundamentally wrong, squarely evil, so we won't push or manipulate, or use it to exploit etc. As always the explication would be simpler if we didn't have to make such a paranoia about profiteers and manipulators.

From now on, your personal file will be your connection to death, civilizations invented themselves all kind of stories about death, we will make something cool, good, and more personal, out of the moment, but no religious relations. You can still become religious or sect indoctrinated if you want, just watch for your hands around innocence...There will be no religious institution to spread the good news for us, we'll learn a basic level of spirituality and philosophy that is made with possibilities and probabilities and life understanding as a background, with something never seen before; a definition of a good and a love ideal and a comfort ideal, and their associations to reality permitting their systematization. You spring from that, explore others beliefs if you want, but one of the reason for the basis is to render religions unnecessary so they will become culture things or decoration. This is the scenario where I will be more than glad to have them, many of their structures are wonderful. If they take a non-manipulative or non-indoctrination role in our reality, they may even develop as a global second level reality culture thing if they tough the heat they made humanity live in, but that will be hard since they may be quite limited as our spirituality takes its space. Now, knowing how the mind of many people have been made weak with time, it is evident that as soon as the reality will face some big problem, some religious institutions will be out to profit from the opportunity to happily bring the ego-god throne or the popemobile back from the shed. So, one way religions can exist here will be as the different historical paths about gods, or educative museum, but that will be a culture specific choice, and that's the only way they can still exist as independent institutions. The reality itself will build a global institution attaching all religions with god or gods supremacy in them as a part of human history.

But we won't think about that for a long time, so we may choose an institution from current reality that wants the contract, like Christianity, and it won't be harder than what they already do. If not, the reality will eventually create a cold institution to do the job of categorizing all that. Their new job will be to lead people who want more ego-gods associated spiritual leanings, but people interested in that will learn the basic level of the global view first before choosing other such specializations, but this institution will have to deal with all religion associated history too, to the point where the life spirituality starts, which is somewhat now.

But I'll override the pope right away on many thing, no choice. For a start, I'll release their priests of their chastity spell, that way they'll have a chance to know what true love is and stop spreading it at all sauces. Then again, maybe they shouldn't, because they'll immediately use their position to profit from the innocents, it's in the gene prerequisites. I'm bad (but it's a fact), but religions are out of our pants here; and no sexism anymore, women will be part of it too. And finally, they will open all their institution to the reality scrutiny, they'll open all doors so we know all the truth of what they are hiding; all the super important archives that they hide like crooks, you hide a single thing and we eliminate them from our reality with bombs and you'll just be a part of our history "books"; we don't accept liars and cheaters, we start with clean stuff, that's all, you are open or you have no place here, and those who reveal as traitors are destroyed in our most ugly manner; go cheat somewhere else (it doesn't mean cheaters are all future traitors, I think we all want to cheat things a little, particularly in a competitive environment, if it's just to grab at the price faster (animals do that all the time, use speed as a priority where it works, but yeah, I cheated my way out of a few touchy situations too, one cheat actually lasted 6 months, and it permitted me to have a lot of free time, so seeing cheating as an all out enemy is definitively a vision I would fight too, like seeking the elimination the survival ego (instinct) drive, even pure reward is important, it's all in the extremes.

So it will have to be the main associating structure of everything concerning history related to religions to the photography era in truth, minimum, they will deal with religion associated museums and structures too, they will reveal everything, they will totally stop the PMBBD, and they'll make a global way to associate religions for people to chose their alternative view of gods themselves easily. Once our society is going strong, we will give a budget to this religious institution and it will deal with it, but the pressure stops, the same for playing with love and kid's underwear and minds. All that won't stop people going to all these churches of all kind, believing in anything, as adults, but the pressure stop and things must go to their place. I'll add that if there are too many churches, some will be razed or used for something else. As I already said, there are limits and priorities, you can't ask a new reality to take care of every structures that exists; there is already enough to ruin present reality...

That's somewhat the only way religions can associate to the life reality, I know they think have all the machinery to do the pardon part of the job, they are entitled in their godly pretention they think, but that amounts to 0 here, they don't have the monopoly of deciding these matters. The way it works now is that a different attitude must reflect comprehension, for pardon to work, if not there is no pardon to be had, whatever who is advantaged or who understand better and change, and you won't get better understanding out of me with fear or brainwash allright? We can't have resentment forever, we are all humans, maybe I did Christianity in another life, mistakes are opportunities to learn and do better, pardon works with understanding.

So if we are to build wonderful places where people worship in spirituality, it will be for life possibilities and probabilities, what I call the life-gods ideology; there can be a god, there can be gods, a life god, a UI, life systems, and all kind of high consciousness species, aliens and entities dealing with good and evil matters, a paradise or a hell is in the way we develop a reality, not a religious insanity, there can be reincarnation concepts, destiny, and things probably continue after death with a rewind of our history, thus human history, and if so logic tells of an ongoing selection or knowledge acquisition process. As a society we take the decision for the betterment of all to minimize superiority associations to gods, we are a whole process, life as the developing intelligence of the universe, a creativity and emotional association.

People will have a the simple general vision, but not as an intensive brainwash, I see it more like a light course that get more complex as kids grow-up, it could even be implemented in nature activities. Seriously, who doesn't understand the things I talk about? That's the basis but they'll know about history, about religions, and they will visit those places, but no ganging self-indoctrination before adulthood. You can even make it a different level course where all the rest of specialized courses gains are more used for their utility and relations toward things as a whole and implemented, associated to a fundamental philosophy of life made of possibilities and probabilities. And another course can be made to somewhat deduct a different path of "destiny", more related to humanity good goals, a more global view of interests heading than from pure specialized, or job, courses (career choice). But all that seems a bit complicated, so a simple course is already a good start.

Your religion can still be anything, any religions can exist under a related form. That's the peaceful ways religions can be part of the life reality. But I may be dreaming in Technicolor, since they are kind of condemned with the form they took, so probably we'll have to do everything ourselves because they were made to be intrinsic to this reality and be interdependent of it. We'll still want their historic roots and books and some representative churches for sure, just don't forget my vision of events is not a fact, and I'm tainted with a personal bias against the institution, but people are not me, they take the decision that better help our goals, they can adjust things better appropriate. Why do you think popes are always old super successful priests? And why if they change a little their opinion the world go nuts? They're condemned the same way a prime minister is condemned, the super successful politician...The only way to restructure the religious institution in its reality is through massive problems as opportunities, that's why the antichrist was invented by Christianity, to take the blame or cause a restructuration and reformulation of the bible to exploit his visions, like anarchy that kind of serve the same purpose for the Democracy-Capitalism business, in fact, probably both notions were developed to work together, the antichrist may have been seen as the leader of anarchists, even if the notion is conflicting. But sorry, it's "Adam" here, and I make paradises of love...

Now, you can bet there are definitively too many churches and related indoctrination structures too, keeping one out of 10 will still give an unacceptably big number to me, so much someday we may want to make the hall of the Christ or something, a vast, gothic infinite alley of churches pieces, and collections of masonries, with protected vitrails, with a thousand painting of the same bit of misery, and a procession of trucks after trucks of marble statues, all around a center pyramid of death made of all the stone slabs that have been cut, transported, engraved, and planted only to end-up displaced again, to free the condemn piece of land for our use, and isn't it what a pyramid is? A rock on a tomb, Christianity didn't invent that one, people do put rocks on tombs practically instinctively, to remember, and if Egyptians didn't go completely nuts extreme with the concept, then at the mass scale we could consider a pyramid of nicer engraved rocks as totally appropriate, but you don't have to make a hole full of skeletons under, or a king room, it's the spirit that counts, so yes large well lighted tunnels would be nice, as a kind of place to encourage closure, you may pass a few days there, alone or with family and friends, and walk slowly, you could really make that beautiful you know, amnd as people do their things they chose the path of their closure. ai would see this more like a I think this vision put me a little at peace with these pyramids, as total could say could were not A gothic tainted kind of cultural society could take care of that (yes if someone proves me Japanese culture exists), and I'm absolutely serious, better respectful than me, that could even become an important pilgrimage aspect of our reality! But it's still hard to come to this conclusion when you think of all the beauty of the artistry, all the greatness of the texts...Caretakers of a special land where history meets modern society, a place where cemeteries, tombs and statues, are part of a vast historic protected landscape, as one caring goal, but the culture must give it honor, spirit, it may even chose a few specific place on earth with the best environmental mood for it. That would be a good place for those strange associations we have today that developed through these "rock and candle" times. No need to go to that extent, but you understand that ghosts, angels, daemons, vampires and monsters would be at their place there, and since it takes enough place, have enough use, need enough people to make it a culture, some people may even eventually like that culture better, if they are not ridiculous, so you don't have to exaggerate dresses, have some class, develop an "acceptable" grade-robe. But it's just one of the strange possibilities that is open, more extreme you could have a difficult genetic anomaly given an easier environment without medication, just to see how the genetic develops, like a schizoid culture trait (mental trait like the fabled telepath); that should be interesting in the good and evil domain of things, imagine the discussions and mood at work, or maybe a heavily supervised medical community would be a better idea, I don't know.

We (me and my cat) want religions off people's skin, but we must still care for their history. I tend to think religions will end up having no use for us, they're even supposed to disappear someday, and those left will still exist because they have a job, so it is your choice how you want to end your reign, either you worsen my opinion, or you gain more of my respect. For the life reality, we'll keep some churches in their original state, and we'll redesign most of the rest that fall within our territory to life spirituality standards, religious involvement can be appreciated, they'll even still do masses if they want, and beautiful thing too.

We'll want our own creations, but I like the design of most churches, I always liked those places, so we may redesign many of them by removing most religious associations, like paintings, and Christ crucifixes and stained glass. Then we grow plants and small trees under led lightning, add a few animal statues or virtues statues, small living animals that don't shit too much or everywhere, and remake stain glasses with such ideas in mind. The benches can be installed perpendicular to walls, with a small stream running down from a fountain that can be as much in the middle of the place as running down from the podium spot. The top of the church may be emphasized on the sky, stars, can be a few or many, or a galaxy, or a solar system, or a small vessel, but nothing too overwhelming, the trick is a digitalization first, and great quality artistry. Some small stain glass windows or light effects can be used on the roof too, or projection, but everything must have subtlety as a prerequisite. Behind the priest you have a digital effect, it can be colorful square traits getting longer toward the sides with lightning and you can plant a simple big cross there. So you have the UI represented behind the priest, gods possibilities, and life and its systems on the floor and sides and as water. Humans are the people in the church. A priest can read passages from a life spirituality book at some moments during the day, but the goal is to have a peaceful place open all day long for people to just relax in silence, exactly like in a library, and that's why you'll have books and digital no noise device permitted, talking interdicted, and people will appreciate or walk or kneel or whatever, as long as they do things respectfully and in sense. People can transfer credits easily if they want too. That's somewhat my vision, which is highly malleable I shouldn't fail to mention. As for virtues, the main idea comes from the ultima game series I played as a young man, to which I'll add a few ones. Evidently you can compare those to good principles. Here are a dozen; compassion, valor, courage, spirituality, truth, sacrifice, honor, justice, humility, love, respect, honesty, patience.

Our reality way for death will be a basic allocated space for our personal file which will be kept eternally as a big facet of our history. That's an eternal thing, and it's not a mummy. And we surely won't permit infinite memory don't we? No, we'll calculate it well, but the basis quantity will grow over time even if you may have quantity insurances with specifics; the planetary memory will take that form, it will be centralized duplicated in technology and place. The memory is to eternity, even if accident happens, so doubling quantity through death insurance may be costly.

Just don't go crazy with it; if you are to make an interstellar vessel, it may not be a good idea to carry a ton of data that will rarely be used for something useful. The lifetime memory (personal data) will be bigger in basis and in possibilities since you're living and a dynamic working part of society, but upon death your basic file remains, some DNA information, and your choice, or friend's choice of stuff, will fill the remaining quantity. Eventually, quantity may be less of a limitation and we may even go to the extent of keeping some more profound and complete personal cell's know how.

So young man, what are you gonna do with your cadaver? We'll encourage organ donation as a default path, but we'll have many options, you can invent too, as long as it's not crazy or doesn't create problems; it's your body. We don't want big land space for burying either, and no skeletons laying everywhere. Plant a small plaque on a wall if you want and align bodies to it maybe. Me I'd prefer to be stripped of my useful organs, then get my body not stuffed with chemicals drowned in the deepest crevasse of the ocean, but that's just personal preference, at that step you do what you want; animal food? Forest fertilizer? No problem. For a personal spiritual meaning, a ship for a funeral would be like bringing back my body back to the unknown, to another dimension where life started, a reality on earth where people can't walk on, where my body can never be recovered. Then you'd turn around to go back to reality, forever leaving my material body to oblivion, no chance to come back to it. Better condensed earth cemeteries is still an option, but a precise spot of ocean could be used for that too, if that could work without making it a shark show, even if I don't much mind how life reclaims my body.

Now that we're gone with the wind, we're as well continuing braking away (braking away? I wouldn't try that...). A week will now be 6 days. That will give a time change necessary to have a decisive switch of reality, like a language, or a part of our individuality, the proof of our will to grow differently; it's another entity, with its own dreams, its own needs, its own laws, its own pace. It's young but it knows where it's going. We'll do it bluntly and evidently, the ax will fall another time to sculpt the form of our reality, and yes we will survive 6 days weeks, and that will give 5 weeks a month exactly, we won't fool around finding which day we are. That's 360 days a year and those surplus days are just a bonus, related to the closeness of earth orbit to the sun, and evidently, a strong influencer of global warming, we should not forget. Bonus days will be used as see fit, it can be party time for all I care.

Time switch will disappear, there are no week-ends, if you want 2 days off a week, you'll deal things in your contract of work. It may seem that time will go faster, but don't forget there are 5 weeks a month now, and that will make time seem to go far slower; you're not supposed to zip through your life working like a crazy like you can't take your time enjoying your time. And if you want a standard, I'll give you one; you'll work 5 days in a row, like you always did, one day off at the end of the week, and a week off at the end of the month, this is only a general rule, you can forget it for any reasons, yet, such a standard may be useful for many people, and having a whole week to yourself every months will permit more serious or interesting activities far more often.

Things like the zodiacal system can still exist, it could even get better if some serious science was involved to better pinpoint effects, because as it is it it's like a big balloon inflated with an atom of air, or is it the lone super strong surviving neuron that dictates the comportment of all profiteers? That applies to all those charlatans that hypnotize or speak to the dead with tricks from unconscious autosuggestion. My personal opinion is I am not acting like I do because I'm in the Sagittarius epoch, I'm not a scorpion that's supposed to be a sexual performer, you're a fish that looks like a fish? It's a sign that fishy shit will happen. I don't like all those associations. Constellations taking the form of animals is allright, what I know is that I don't decide to form a couple because a scorpion fucks well with a wolf (there's a wolf right? There got to be a wolf, the leader of the pack and all...), that's stupid even if people don't believe it, that's still too stupid to be acceptable to hear. I'm talking about the attitude and prediction stuff too, I do believe planets, stars even galaxies have some effect on life, but I believe it global and its variations, most of the time, incredibly insignificant. In fact it is my opinion that it's a whole contortion to just make people celestial beings, confounding all the science with the effect of seasons or time; the season you are born in may have an effect, that nearer the truth, I'm sure I could personally "feel" most months of the year from all their subtle differences eyes closed. Maybe the strongest external influencers in such small variations could be the temperature, humidity, pressure, sound, smell, attitudes (parents giving birth in the winter may not, most of the time, have the same attitude as parents birthing in the summer, or at night versus day, and this can be related to the whole birthing process during which parents may have their attitude influenced by external factors.). If the zodiacal system has a scientific or historical use, then we should stick to that.

Still, it's almost at a level of bullshit I could tolerate, and there's nothing to stop our people from eventually inventing such things with, yes, spiritual associations, but we'll prefer these auto-suggesting attitudes and prediction to be based locally, culturally. We could invent one based on seasons, maybe not with a science for it, but someone living in a desert won't have the same kind of "horoscope" as someone living at the North Pole is what I mean. Still, I don't like autosuggestion manipulation, people believing the stuff have a tendency to take the state to make it somewhat true. As for prediction, what they predict is what is evident in deductions from the news, when they're lucky, like saying there will be floods this year because it is logical due to the environmental mess we made.

What will you say of your great science that is so powerful it can know who we are right down to our daily activities and attitude while you can't predict a new reality any better than any religions? As a matter of fact, if the new reality is successful, all of you that missed its coming will look kind of incompetent, like all those predicators of old who never saw the coming of computers... Is a new reality big enough an event for a Nostradamus or a religion or a zodialist to predict?

And I don't say astrology is bad "science", it is an fun thing, and nothing wrong with the classifying as houses thing, my problem is with human attitudes and predictions, associating stars placement to human attitudes for autosuggestion, like associating houses to human attitudes, saying we'll change to this or that attitude when we'll hit the fish, then create a worldwide psychosis by associating it to Nostradamus 2012 and a biblical prophecy to get the wanted result. And yes there are many factors that are coinciding at this moment of our history, but I said coinciding, and they are entirely human attitudes related, nothing will happen in 2012 except results of human attitudes or coinciding events that may have been predicted logically, but even that is far fetched to me, think about it... And yes Christianity is always ready to profit from any opportunity to get believers, soon it will predict the end by slabs of 1 years just to be sure, but yes, it is a high probability that all hell will break loose in the next 100 years, so they'll be right, and yes there will be people who will try to do drastic things so they'll have their antichrist and anarchists, and yes zodialists will have their new age epoch, and yes life is under all kind of cycles, and some concern its life-forms so it is possible that someone gains a good prediction skill (nothing to do with miracles), even if it possible that a "Jesus" kind of guy may have been extremely sensitive to some life facets, and the same for the Mayans, but the Nostradamus looks like a crook, but maybe I'm wrong, he looks like a well known gentleman lately, an old fat guy with a white beard...

There have been thousands of manipulators that passed their life in sacred texts and trying to make every phrases fit stuff for perfect interpretation, all their might invested in trying to mess-up the minds and judgment of masses, running all over the globe to get filmed by dramatizators like they've got the truth and credibility on the subject, puppets doing exactly what the authors of those prophecies wanted of them; instill the end in 2012. Or is it to gather people for whatever lewd activities in the name of the institution they want eternal?

Now, to throw oil in that fire we'll have to do even better since our fundamental time base will set the end of the hell on earth, the countdown that started when someone reset time to 0, or decided to be the navel of time...Do we have the name of this guy? That's kind of big you know... but our reality is the start of earth paradise, so we must start time over again, you can see it as the beginning of a paradise vision, or a new age of the horoscope, or the beginning of a new step, or all that together like it's the great conjuncture. The other reality can keep on counting from its own base for time, but will start at year 0, this reality did it for its governmental pacifying institution, to make its vision invincible, eternal, impossible to forget or discard, the PMBBD so big and strong it totally messed-up history and humanity in death, injustice, violence and mental destruction caused by bowing it to the ego-god ideal. We need to reset time to 0 for the life god (s) ideal.

So the new reality will start at year 0, we do things inside 6 days weeks to mess up the horoscope and remove the intruding sunday (god day) the do nothing day. We start our own timeline, and it's not year 1 after a JN son of a god walked the earth (or is it?), it is year 1 after life reality, or year 1 life reality, something like that, year 1 new age, or just year 1. And to give still more troubles to the zodialists, we could even move new year closer to spring, yes sir we can do that, since we won't keep most of the holidays of father reality. We can remove its unconscious association to a stretch of cold troubles, and associate the thriving of life to the coming of the New Year, and we could keep Christmas from father reality at its place for a big winter party. Who decided for winter New Year anyways, we voted for this? And for what reasons? We should seize the opportunity to make a list of all the implanted big time stamps that affect our mentality through placebo effects.

Equinoxes and solstices are different things. Solstices just happen and have not much bear on temperature except over millions of years, so we have to base that on equinoxes, but for now, thanks to solstice (marked by Christmas) encroaching that has nothing to do there, there are only 2 of the things (equator), when the sun is nearest to the equator. So we'll have to remove solstice and replace it with north and south equinoxes (tropics). We could go for 6 seasons, add one when the sun can be seen all year at a minimum of 45 degree from the north the north, the same inversed for the south, one at the Cancer tropic or lower, and finally one at the Capricorn tropic or higher, for a total of 6 seasons. But that's extreme if we base season's types solely on noticeable environmental differences (extremes), while understanding that every month of the year can be seen as a season if it was not for that. So ad another option we could have Winter (extreme cold, survival, nose frozen), Fulig (just a name, frisky, burgeoning, torpor, minimal smells), Spring (mild, comfortable, life, flowering, fresh smells), Summer (hot, visual and olfactive assault), Autumn (colorful trees, food, decaying alchemical aromas), Omiss (snow, cold wind, death).

Christmas now? You know I like to wear Santa Claus skin too, it feel at home so much I'd want him to actually exist, but the true story got perverted until the pope wears the costume, the profiting transformation, the story that got manipulated to become a tool for businessmen, which is quite insane, it's like putting a kid reward system in the hands of profiteers, those with the greatest propensity to end-up causing evil...Santa Claus ended-up taking this form to sell a product Coke, and it worked to the point that it became inconceivable that someone of the time refuses a bottle of Coke. He became fantastically powerful PMBBD machine to sell stuff, half of which quickly end-up in the garbage, for parents to feel good, and to divide kids as good and evil while the concept on this aspect of innocence shouldn't even exist (competition to please parents). He became the god of capitalism; no wonder the pope endorses the coat, it show whose interests his religion serves...

He probably got disassociated from Coke because he was not an appropriate base for their products or they didn't need him anymore. His appropriate place was with children so they strongly associated him to Christmas and let everybody that sell something use him to put pressure on parents, through kids, to buy and encourage people to work more for it (I always felt bad with my cheap gifts and that didn't help me like Christmas, all my critical monthly expenses would leave me with 150$ free, minus 100$ for the bus, that would leave me 50$ for making gifts and I'd have a hard time surviving December and January and half the gifts I received ended up as trash so I abandoned; let me be cheap, it's so fun living under social assistance and profiting from the system, particularly for someone that likes to give surprise gifts once in a while, less at a precise day, less so to receive, I'm too difficult. At Christmas people see it almost like a competition, and I hate to feel like I owe something from being forced to something else, which includes reality. I think the difference is that I like the recipient to get it like lotto, not as an exchange, I see something that could please someone and there you go, no afterthought either side, it's just a surprise that happened). As for Santa Claus, they tried to help the ego-god ideal along the way by making him a controlling god flying in the sky (they all fly...I like it too) giving gifts mainly in function of obedience. I may not be totally right about my story but that should be like it, what counts is the intentions and results, yet, I'll say that there feels like big credibility is missing.

Now, there is nothing wrong associating a costume with an action like distributing gifts, and it is even good for children to have that since they are children and at that age it is important to listen to authority, and a gift exchange is guaranteed to be unfair or unsatisfactory so it is good for parents to have either an exit door or a justification, and having a "mascot" to pay the gifts, when the children know it is the parents that pay, give a good displacement effect of ego and opens the way to the good "lies" (art) of the fantastic, of fantasy; it opens imagination possibilities when you see such a humanly created piece of fantasy distributing gift in the biggest celebration of the year (and sitting children every corner of new York city, don't think your kid doesn't know there is a million Santa Clauses...).

But Christmas is a celebration of the winter solstice and Jesus birthday, not the birth of capitalism! And it's my birthday too, and I won't pass it singing and kneeling for another guy! What is this perversion? I guess that's why we put Santa-Claus at the same time, to make it a party for the rich as well as giving them a feeling that they're good for distributing gifts since they're the ones with most means. Jesus is your usual total tool. The red Santa-Claus born out of publicity is a total tool too, to increase profits, production, pollution and exploitation by manipulating the young and forcing people to see Christmas mostly as a money thing to the point that today I'm stuck in a civilization that spend 1/10 of its time bumping itself on Santa Clauses every corners, since they start the pressure at the beginning November. Profiteers made of a supposedly altruistic, loving and family moment, an ego and, for many, a dividing moment in our life, and for those reasons, I'd banish him or severely limit its exposition, making him a thing that almost appear at Christmas everywhere.

But since I like the costume, I'll readjust the story a little, what I like is that he comes from the North Pole, he is bloated red, he is secret, he is the friend of wild animals, those make him fly in the sky without fumes, he judges people, and he distributes appropriate gifts. That's how I like to see him. But today he's not in a mood, the sky is full of planes, and he can't fly around secretly, and wild animals are dying or choking in pollution. The worst of all is that he aint got a home anymore, it is melting, and people are all salivating at his resources.

Sorry man, these resources are for future people who will think big and far about space, not old exploiting and profiting minds, I'll destroy you if you use these resources for country competition and entertainment, no profiteers will divide this place, only true good people will come here. Now prepare your scientists gremlins running everywhere dividing my land for competition, their blood will spill for pardon, and not only for being an insult to their profession, but for destroying my place in their incompetence, by working for profits and for exploiters, by not taking the responsibility of their title. Once you'll be off your saintly white coat of gods, you'll take it to clean the mess. You can't control the mess eh! You have no place here for as long as you are not good people, and you can tell me I'm sick all you want, I'll cover this earth red with your blood until only the two caps are white!

That's a way of saying those resources should be reserved for the new reality, surface resources are becoming rare, even if there is nothing wrong using some with good judgment, but reacting to environmental changes is very important, if we really lose an ice cap, then methane may finish-off any potential at recovering the environment, so we better be careful with that. But I already explained what the earth minimal life conditions are; the 2 ice caps are necessary, losing one is like losing half the life potential. So humanity will have to do anything within its powers to control methane liberation, which may be one fantastic quest, totally overwhelming any other dreams, including developing a different reality, things may end-up worse than Chernobyl earth, and icing the place all over as a reaction may bring about a worst situation, or better, depends. That's one of the challenge we have right now, with all the other challenges we cumulated from waiting and enriching gods, we must be capable of controlling the icing and melting whatever happens, and not worsen things elsewhere like doing it by throwing a toxic chemical all over the place, what is acceptable is more like controlling ourselves, changing our attitude and habits drastically, that's in part why a new reality is the solution. These resources will be associated to a change of attitude, besides, we got enough for our misery; when we'll know how to deal resources fairly, then I'll trust we can use these for the greatest projects, surely not to have people living luxury lives.

As for Santa Claus in our reality, everybody could have a gift from 3 choices from him, according to age, every year, but don't think you'll get a big gift, we have your personal file, we know who you are, at what date you're born, I wouldn't go full intrusive and involve good and evil, just from simple data mostly available to everybody, but you can still turn off the function, or make it like a casino machine. We'll have nonpublic global A&D groups for that; they'll decide a list of available things to distribute every years; as gifts for Christmas, as gifts for love day, as personal gifts too. Some will be choices of society production, but we should really try to make an emphasis to have artistic value there, we should squarely develop small artistry as a job (dong beautiful smaller things like paintings), I'm sure a lot of people would prefer to have such choices for gifts, and the feedback would encourage better taste or quality. But as I already said, no exaggeration, the reality just work differently, and we'll want to slowly implement gifts as a part of it, and if distance is an issue those may simply be a credit bonus at some stores.

Santa-Claus will stay the same but it will only be exposed one week before Christmas and Christmas itself one month, and I see nothing wrong if people have fun taking the Santa Claus form to distribute reality's gifts. Now, I could eliminate Christmas simply because there is a "Christ" in the name, but ok if it's just an historic relation, because we can't have religious party around kids. I can accept a view associated to gifts and abundance in our reality, the solstice is allright, but we won't mix religion with it and gifts, the same for a mentality since the place is already filled with the "be a good kid" principle from Santa-Claus. So it's their choice if parents want to associate it to a religion, but the limit will be made at the source; no religion will have the right to use public structures to have religious indoctrination groupings containing young people; that's all year round and savages and shamans will do with it. Finally, your birthday is important too, we'll have global days, but your personal day is important to the reality, you'll receive something from the reality, but it will be a secret thing too.6/8

There will be a love day, but not like St-valentine, for true loving couples only, and not to sell chocolate, alcohol, sex garments, viagra and all the panoply of aphrodisiacs; it's not a fucking day, you have all those things everyday of the year, no need to make pub campaigns for more; we want a general ceremony for true love, a moment where we'll show we value it, where we'll express the ideal of it so strongly as a civilization that it will reverberate with power for a full year. It will be for heterosexual couples that have been some time together, like a 2 years proven attachment in both personal file, but don't worry, there won't be policeman strolling everywhere on love day.

Here's an idea as to how we will make it, evidently and as always, it is just to give an idea. We'll see it is as an opportunity for heterosexual couples (baby making ideal) that are associated in their file to have a "chosen" sunny day and a half, beginning at noon and finishing at midnight the next day, (1.5-2 week days) to have the world smile at them, as a way of saying that we are proud of that most fundamental part that makes our society.

Everything will be embellished for that day, like we do for Christmas, but Christmas needs some humility, it's becoming ridiculous, so love day will be our priority day, we'll spend far more energy and credits on love day than Christmas to make it a success, we'll use the same kind of preparation, a month in advance, to do it. We'll make our home and everything beautiful for love day, we'll overwhelm the place with flowers, which are never a waste, plants guirlandes and shoot confetti, things like that. But we won't go crazy either and ruin ourselves covering the whole place with decorations; it will mainly take place on the "main" areas of every cultural bubbles. Everybody can participate in the embellishment; they can appreciate that day, even if they may not participate directly.
For our flower city, love day will begin with an ordered evacuation plan, we need that if we are to meet a quick hazard like a terrorist attack, or an infestation of insects or a contagious sickness, in fact the plan must be capable to sustain the city as completely empty for a day or more, and that scenario can work within the city too, like an evacuation to the basement through blast doors at every stairs intersections disinfection sass (not necessarily hilarious gas and fire), there must be the option to stay in rooms with injected air to skip a disease, and there must be the option to leave the rooms alone, and another option could be to divide the city in a few "independent" parts to manage different dangerous situation developing among masses of people. I'm imagining flying city here, but it can still be useful on lands. Those who can't or don't want will have to say it through their file, and they'll be taken care of or ignored if it it's just for fun.

For love day, people will be colored in different ways and exit the city along the main paths of the gardens, ranks of 4 large for 4 cultures. You'll do things under some basic order, ranks like when you were young, and you'll slowly fill the wanted design in the gardens, less healthy and old to the exterior of the different effect we are trying to achieve. We'll ask for an effort of 2 hours, from the moment there is basic line going out (can form bigger "pure" lines that will mix outside), which should start going at a precise time around 9am. It can extend for another 2 hours as people slowly evacuate or get replaced, it can carry on if far enough from main events. Each culture take the form of a filament of a specific color in the corridors of the city before exiting, then, depending on the level of competence (people may like this stuff and it may become a regular training activity, as good as yoga or cheerleading, or running everywhere, and since love day is free, those trainers will be paid a salary by reality to do their job year round.) That way we'll do it still more beautiful and professional, difficulties of drill effects appropriate to different levels of competence, and people who don't know where they are just directed as fluids, fluids which may circulate and feed the petal movement and colors effects for a part of the day.

City trains will be power connected together by whatever way and they'll make a nice test run outside too. No big traffic around main places though, road car circulation traffic redirection scenarios will be experimented that day, all the way to the night for light effects, those scenarios will be made like tourism tours where people from places all around can come to take a slow but steady, between 25 and 50 Km/h promenade to see the flower city at its best on love day. You can stay as long as you want, but parking will be limited to half hours for restauration, and quick stops for servicing because the parking nearest to main events will be for those who want more direct contribution, because only couples, workers, and people with gifts will be "permitted" to circulate freely there, people who don't want or can't just have not to care or watch on their balcony if they want, circulate without exaggeration, unseen from A to B preferably. Since you don't need to have children to be in love, the very young will be taken care of by their specific daycare institutions, for the whole day and a half, while the older ado will participate in coincided activities, like some group camping in forest to learn things, or a group trip to make a pilgrimage to bubble associated historical learning, the older they are the more they can expand their trip to any historical learning, or it can be sports competitions, there are many activities that can be made for groups of young people, initiations, armies of them playing paintball war games through the night, etc.

Music will not be too loud for the day, background melody for the most of it, and I'm not talking about lone violin, we don't want a depression or a nostalgia revision of the greatest hits of the 60's, we want to encourage people to participate or do some simple dances at some places. The pace will start slow, it's not a crazy party, not a procession either, find some candor, dress particularly pretty or sexy (not the string or latex kind), hold the hand of your love, kiss and embrace more than usual, relax, and take your time to see how things changed. Most people will not work, only restaurants and some entertainment will be open, flower and confetti throwers and such people will contribute, the same for people who will want to distribute some gifts, people and reality will do it, and not for profits.

People not in love who want to participate by bringing something or helping, showing they encourage the ideal, you do what you want but the minimum is not to break the spirit of the day. Everybody can prepare some form of gifts, dress particularly well, and surprise people in love without waiting for appreciation. I know I make it sound like gift reality for someone that's not supposed to exaggerate, but gifts can be time, playing music, you can associate to make a professional public barbecue, all kind of things can be done. Couples can even select themselves a servant for the whole day, learn to know somebody, if it can be done with a smile and no condescendence or exaggeration, but loving people are supposed to have the right attitude.

I believe people will discover they are less self driven than they are pushed to be in this reality, I believe that most will want to participate even if they are not in love, I bet they'll be ready to sweat the whole day to contribute and help free, and who knows, maybe many lone people will meet that way, on that day, as one of the fundamentals of true love is control of one's ego...

As for loving couples, you're strolling through a paradise, but you don't have to pass your whole day out like you're forced to it. It is more like the main places will be free of activities except a relaxing "picnic" ambiance where everything is provided. Stop at a restaurant, eat something without paying, grab some fresh fruits at the many food stands that will be there for you, drink some wine if you want, at your service, just do things reasonably, like you're used to it, it is not an opportunity to get an indigestion or drunk. Receive a few small valuable gifts, drop the colorful wrapping on the floor, and the hot night is wholefully yours too, just don't make a show; most are supposed to be adults anyway.

I see nothing wrong if things are arranged for some marriages to take place that day, but they will have to be exceptionally beautiful to honor love, and separated, I don't like marriages at the chain, but you can have many places where one take place on that day. A procession ceremony can be made in honor of previously married people too. Cameras will be accepted, limited to professional quality.

As the day advances, we'll start providing and paying for some buffets and more solid entertainment; don't forget that if you're not in love you can participate by helping, but you won't get paid. We'll choose that day to make the most fabulous fireworks displays everywhere, they will work hand in hand with music, and dancing preferably, as the night comes, the beat, intensity and power of music and fireworks will slowly increase everywhere, different from place to place, like over flower cities where we'll light all the roads of different colors like the flower is making itself the most beautiful it can while exploding in pollen of all colors. All that will culminate at midnight to slowly, not radically, come back to relaxing morning. As always, you don't have to exaggerate the fireworks either, these things pollute and we don't want to intoxicate the planet in toxic fumes, but humility there is no better. Some cultural societies can experiment with other options, like filling their center place with mist and light and sound effects. We may limit the yearly production of fireworks, we're not pyrotechnic entertainment crazies; we'll be selective but we won't blow it all the same day, but big lasers and light effects are at their place on love day too; heat those power lines...

Big musical and dancing productions will be encouraged to take place on that day too, and I don't mean your "loving" raves, those are specific party, there may be some rave music, but not as shows. I'm talking musical and dance creations like updated Hollywood old times, think class, but it's not a white marriage, forget the white overload, but nothing wrong if there is some. Love songs are at their place, there are throngs of them, even if a lot were made by love profiteers. They will be the only paroles accepted, which may form a part of the music, but most of it is exactly that; music. And as the night advances, you can increase the boom boom and techno kind, and after midnight you can slowly make a spike emphasis within a few hours of the kind, but not the "blade" kind, more like the "fluke-zion" kind, more calm, less imposing or forcing, but that's just my personal tastes, cultural societies do their emphasizes as long as they don't make it a sex pressure emphasis, and do I have to say that most activities will take place in city, town, or village centers? It's not an allegoric carnival of sport fans with trumpets, but people can make fires and play music in parks more freely.

And it is not an opportunity to make a baby, you know you are independent people, you decide when you want a baby by thinking about it, we want babies born any day of the year, not a big bunch of them at a precise date, I hate it when peoples do that. There will be specialized A&D groups to make it a success, we'll have ladders of reward based on people's appreciation associated to every individual events, contributions, parts of the day, spirit, place, all kind of categories.

Even if love is an individual thing, we can all show we care for it, that loving couples are the basis of our civilization, one of the most important thing of our society, we don't want to make their life harder but easier, we like them and their attitude, they are not a competition; on that day we show attention to them, and so, this day will reflect it as the biggest feast day of our reality.

Now, all this is crude, there are all kind of things that can be done to make it better, but we'll arrange things so it's not too expensive to the reality either, to not to exaggerate. And it will be a visual way of seeing how many people are truly in love, if we only see a few couples, that's depressing, but you won't see the true extent, or good of it, in the first years of having such a day, it may look strange, maladroit at first, abnormal, and it will be proportional to quantity of people, if we're a tribe we'll have to do with firecrackers and a drum...

If I would have made a tentative description of Christmas before it existed, you'd probably have ended up laughing; think of all the preparation around it where you have to go chop a tree, pass a whole weeks running everywhere in stores, ruining yourself to buy stuff, go at a midnight mass to think religion, then invite a Santa Claus to distribute gifts. Strange it doesn't sound ridiculous (almost though), and the same applies here, just have some imagination, I'm not right on the spot in everything I say. And yes, there are always jealous people, I'm damn jealous or envious of many things myself, just do with it, if we bow to all jealousy, we're as well dead (you still got to act fair).

Finally, this is just me writing how I'd see love day, it's not a survival necessity to have such a day, neither is a Christmas day. And that was just for the reality, every culture should have a love day of its own too, totally apart and different, like St-valentine. There may be all kind of days for worshipping something; another one we should invent is a life day, and not a stupid thing you don't notice to satisfy a gang that is complaining. But there won't be religious, racist, sexist, and no envious minority day. You'll practice these things personally, as adults, or under proven no negative effect on others, culturally, like nationalist days that will be bubble specific.

Cultures now, well, I wrote 30 pages on the subject of trying to keep things somewhat as the are, busting my head in complexities, invalidating them all, tried to remix the soup for something that made sense to no avail, with the only result of a deep frustration at failing, and I tried, and I need a lot to lower my arms, when I'm concentrated, it's my whole body that work toward that end, and I wanted so much that I got out of it with heart pains and a week worth of a cement ball in the chest, and this is no joke, thinking hard while trying hard to write well in another language with a head full of non-existing stuff, add that to a critical pressure against failure and maybe that's enough to kill someone, like an "extreme" sports of writing...So, I'll have to do like for most of what I wrote about, reinvent everything from clean basic principles.

Before thinking that there are limited resources, you got to acquiesce that there is limited space on earth, that's the most fundamental law to plant in our brains. Is there someone to say the contrary? No? Then it is logical that if there is limited space there must be a limit to reproduction, and if there is limited space, then resources are limited too, if not, how would you stuff infinite resources or people in a limited space? (I can't believe I'm actually writing this) Even if the earth makes resources over time, the process is still limited. Now, what do you want to make of it? How do you want it separated? On what principles? And if you give birth to ruin the planet or until you are limited by famines, how can you be trusted to care for life? If you are unable to exploit resources justly while looking for the future, how can you divide lands justly? War? War is fair? Find me a just way, go ahead, you have no choice, what do you want? Africans spreading everywhere? English white taking most space? Or making homogenous slurry all over? Do you want to be fair or unfair? Do you want war or peace? Choose your destiny! Many races or a result of mixing them all as one? Fair or unfair? War or peace?

I want many races and many languages, I want to be fair and I want peace. That's how I want people covering the limited lands and using the limited resources, and that's totally in conflict with the wishes of this reality where everything is competition making that goal impossible, where profit is the goal, making it impossible, where unfairness is systemized, making it impossible, where everybody is war ready, making it impossible and more reasons I forget. (There are exceptions, like Quebeckers, who don't have a military force, but we're not Quebeckers aren't we? We are Canadians, and they have an army to impose fear unto us, Quebeckers, if we dream too much, or get too excited or emotive..). So, I still have to invent a solution since no psy or scientist or expert will do it right, and surely not the rich or governments, whatever they jump from one luxury summit to the other in their big meetings of the most G.

I found no valid argument to keep cultures and races as they are. And I truly tried to find an existing hint to set me on a track that made sense but found no truly valid arguments even if there is a certain level of success at developing differences within the country system, but in the end, other attitudes will eliminate that sole positive point for countries. And nationalism, which is not an argument, implanted from long ago and a deep unconscious thing now, doesn't work to stop the "competition soup" momentum while providing tons of racism, and my effort ended in just that, the end of racism by the lifting of the structure that encourages it; the country competition fun, the culture competition, whatever both end up as the same and both are inadequate dividing structure that have no place in our reality. And their ultimate result is that there will eventually be a single race and mentality all over the place, whatever the nationalism effect, be it from country competition racism (you become like your competitor), or from mixing everybody in a soup in the name of an end to racism; both vision end-up as the same in the end, but that end is still far away, the final form of this reality is just taking form at its most massive level and as international. Anyway, that's hard to justify, and for those who want to believe the soup won't end as slurry, then both realities have the same good goal; there is only one good view, only one option if you want diversity in the end; and it is the protection and development of races.

But from the basis principle, I will still have to reinvent the notion of cultures and expose some of the arguments that brought me to the dumping of the complex stuff I wrote on the subject, only to always end up in violence, exploitation, injustice and whatever else catastrophic results. In fact, that may be what failed this reality from the beginning, a competitive ideal that divided everybody in a mess, competed everything to reign forever whatever in multiculturalism or not (note to self, is it at this my first hint of the ego-god ideology?).

My conclusion is very simple; there are not a bunch of human races but only one, and it reproduce very well between its infinity of differences. You can see it two ways; there is a single human race called "Adam and eve" or, if you prefer, there is one human race by human being on the planet. Both situations invalidate all races which makes it impossible to satisfy any principles of survival of differences that presently exist. People are independent individuals, and everyone needs a country and its own language, which we cannot do.

Yet, Chinese are different than blacks, no doubt about it, and people can grow very differently as races too, and life needs its high consciousness form to develop differences, so a basis of division is absolutely necessary to protect these differences. The problem is what is a worthy difference? What defines a race or culture? What compose a fair space, number and protection basis? I found some definitions satisfying some and not others and vice versa, so no way out of it by taking a definition that already exists. The only way is to make a new definition that will be fair to everybody and which will be possible to develop in the new reality.

There are critically important reasons to have evident variations of people, particularly if you have vast different territories. These can be mental ideologies or physical ideologies (how to develop the land), racial and language differences. Traits differences plus language difference plus ideology differences, plus land development emphasis; 3 of those will be necessary to form my new "culture" definition of a "race". But I'm getting ahead of myself. Before inventing too much, I'll need to explain more and bash some more in the red so you understand better why and how and don't say right away that I'm wrong. I'll start by saying that you are in another reality, if you want things to be like they are currently then don't read and shut-up. I'll dump this country and culture division system and invent one that is "good" in my mind. It will be a simple start like everything else, as always I'll work with the arguments I'll find, the big part is defending, blocking and preventing attacks, but we are not allways physical warriors, so the word to use is argumenting like crazy, and that will give some value to what I already wrote.

The more division, the more we must satisfy different groups, until the division creates 3000 cultures, which will mostly act in the same manner fundamentally, which I associate a lot to the basic needs of humanity, and the reason (basis) for a vision of reality (that I try to differentiate with society lately). This presently amounts to a batch of details, mainly gotten from PMBBD and competition. The country competition we have today as cultural differences mentality may even come from an initial unconscious will to act independently and stop gregarization, creating unneeded division, or it could be the will of some to divide and compete to reign, or some kind of mix like that. Both cases are not wanted in our reality so I can risk a little doubtful philosophical extrapolation.

Gregarisation (too much contacts and socialization) if we are not made for it, can cause lots of divisions and conflicts, but you gain a lot of efficiency having people work close to their bed and food, it's basic slavery 101, or basic city management, depending where you stand, and you cannot force a heavy and continual pressure to deeply implant a conflicting ideal to the initial unconscious thingy (the logic of life in us) without ending up in sufferings. There are some tentative in this reality to try satisfying division necessity, but they vary from wrong to absolutely "evil". Some sort of explanation would grow the phenomenon through territory differences, invasion opportunities or religious conquest, all unfair, or it can be by a frustrated person in a population that will create a revolution. After that I suppose a language hybridizing can take place to reinforce group independence (unconscious), tough that a lot of time, make nationalism with history, pass the word for years, then you're country ready. That country is now somewhat of an independent entity, but be careful someone doesn't create new dissension among the population from the deception, but you could find yourself a religion, unless you've hit reality philosophy limitations.

That's simplified, kind of unrealistic, half wrong too since it is prevented by the political system itself, meaning that after a country is delimited, most often by war and unfairly, it will be divided in smaller parts under the same kind of rule, but these parts change almost nothing to people in this reality since the main emphasis is profiting whatever the country, so, to conflict itself, the country will form and exist from racial arguments to express differences, but over thousands of years, whatever the effort, you'll unconsciously create the situation to erase these differences since the way the mind work is to find a path of truth whatever the conflict, and that is stronger than your consciousness which can be in conflict forever over what your unconscious decided as the truth, so if your fundamental true drive is a gang of people profiting from a population with some standard facets to do things their way, then that drive will eventually erase the conflicting arguments.

You can have all kind of good principles, but if you're fundamentally evil or unfair, then you'll create hell, even if there are always totally good people trying to make things good, or good stuff from hell's stuff. So, eventually, if countries have been unfairly divided, if population ratios are unfair, if some spread their language unfairly, or the language take unfair space, it means the fundamental drive is a competition of profiting from opportunities, and as such there can be only one winner, or the "economy" is everything, and that's toward such a truth that people will forever walk toward unconsciously, even if global life is against it; you have created a condemnation to boost a limited facet of humanity. And that's why, slowly, more and more countries are implanting multiculturalism like it makes sense, and that will eventually dissolve every race to mediocrity over a long time, or end-up as a superior race that believes it must transmit something to inferiors. Next, even if races still gang together using all kind of superiority arguments like religion, language etc, even if it lasts very long, which the pseudo division system of provinces and states permit, it will still end up in a few more thousand years, as cosmetics, and that's the worst thing you can do with differences; make them insignificant, or erase them. The only exit to this situation in the current state of reality is division doubled by a purge, and it would lead to war. Furthermore, the results would still be unfair ones and it would change nothing in the end, whatever you successfully postpone that end 10 000 years in all kind of wars and divisions and protection strategies; you need the fundamental systematization to be based on straight logical principles.

That was a gross view of a facet of country division, most countries are still born out of war, and they end-up divided to provinces in most cases even if almost everybody has the same mentality, apart new ones that will eventually divide, and there are always exceptions. For now, everything still looks ok, nationalism is a strong conflicting force to the fundamental drive, and these divisions are all under the control of a big ego gang, a government, which got a strong grip with its PMBBD, police and army. Most of them take it easy since they're in enough luxury with everything paid by the population, but once upon a time, one will implant a different thing through history, creating cultural notions of nationalism, until one day there is enough differences that an excited ego leader with its gang and a good PMBBD machine will be able to use those to its own ends. Separatists are born and the pressure begins, with its spikes and its lows, until division. It doesn't always happen, it doesn't always work, or like that, but if one succeeds every 25 years, that's a lot of new countries in 5000 years, while most of them, in the end, don't bring that much of a different life to the people, they only make the ego leader richer or more popular while crediting him for any new evolution the people go through because everything big and positive must get out by his mouth.

Now, you can add any lost tribe that passed thousands years only fucking between themselves, creating specifics traits, who profited from the spreading of civilization, and religion's will to take over the world, to form villages, towns, cities and so on until they want to protect their special trait and ancestry by creating nationalism, often doubled by a pacifying religion, so you listen to the boss still more, and a new culture is born.

I may have inverted an order and I don't know what I'm talking about, and I don't want to know, you got your examples, I got mine. And yes there are contrary tentative and successes, since divided parts must compete to gain more territory, but in the end, the fundamentals is ego, unfairness, war, wrong reasons, and all of it will get erased by entropy of reality, until only cosmetic differences exist, and everybody will make war on cosmetics. In fact, all those notions of division exist out of fear for the end result; it shows that the human unconsciously know it must protect differences, it want to grow good differences, and it want to associate to protect safely the differences it creates, and there are many levels to this, from country to family.

I will say cultural differences are mainly made of 5 values, a racial one, a circumstantial one, a historical one, a language one and a chosen one. We could add religions or "spirituality" in the mix but I'm not in the mood to start another bad trip about religions so I'll simply say that they are meant to extremize the ego-gods ideal which we must resized to adequate standards, put it in its right place, and use in its right form which will be, simply said, as a pressure against the walls of our limitations...got you! Yeah, you can play gods as much as you want in our reality, in fact you could see it as a playground for gods to have fun, but they cannot exaggerate. Once I'll walk the new reality you can call me god and I'll smile, with a wink.

First is visual racial traits evident difference, but since everybody is different genetically, we'll have to be careful with that, I can select a bunch of big noses and make a new race of big noses with them over thousands of years, with nationalism and religions, we could even become the superior race! I may even be tempted to believe that 2 people can grow a whole civilization, and luck in genetic could make the differences since I don't see "mistakes" in variations of genetics; I see a yellow line with 2 sides, luck and mutations, some better, some worse, it defines what we want, what we become. And the scientist that wants to "clean" my "dirty" full of "mistakes" genetic code supposedly composed in vast part of "garbage" should do something else, to stay polite. Furthermore, physical differences are not supposed to become the "raisin wine" of the land, meaning that you cannot categorize people solely from visual differences, you must do it with as much DNA traits as possible, even voice tones and sicknesses can be an argument. Yet, evident is evident, so a certain level of physical difference can be an argument.

The thing you must not forget about this difference concept is that it's mainly a selection process to have potential, you must preserve in the initial reason you wanted to group as different, but while the goal is to slowly develop these, it is not a pressure. The philosophy is that it should feel like a natural state to you, you want to explore it more fully in an environment that somewhat reflects it, where you can more directly influence, while try a little something hard along the way (build your society, and some research capacities) to see if you can work normally, kind of. So this difference thing is not to make a zoo; you don't do it to become unrecognizable or fools to your fellow humans. So the vision is that instead of doing all the effort to change, people will have environments that will help them, that way the bad effect of competition and pressure is limited.

Another thing is education, societies will be able to develop their education themselves, and apart from precise specialties, in it may be possible that a society will become super competent at educating some age group, which can be a very valuable thing.

Second is the place where you're born, you can't overlook that one, it has an influence on how you'll grow and what attitude you'll develop, but a lot of wrongs comes with the lands in the current view of it. Physically, nothing much can be said of it; even if you come from a tribe, you may get slightly modified, or different, from staying there for a long time, particularly if you are not many, and that's all, you are still reproducible humans with any color on earth. But there is a whole batch of mentalities that come with the spot, not only physical traits, religions, sports, language, history etc. all of which can be important, but the most come from influences, which can be kind of large in meaning, not only human, like big trees, yes the kind of forest can have an influence. But whatever the lands, you're still back to the same argument; the only way you can condemn lands to develop particularities in people and history, is through fairness principles. What's more, people change the lands by their presence, and since you cannot move the lands with the people, that makes it an exclusive argument, very important in the development of a "cultural society" and its history, but you got to do things in as much fairness as possible since it is a condemnation, if not, you reap eternal war or very costly competition.

Third is history, grab people like to end their life under a pile of old stuff, even old bricks that took a civilization to pile...(maybe that's how it started, who know, a kid made a pile of flush rocks in the form of a pyramid and the competition started, they just forgot how stupidly it started, or maybe their ancestors threw each a rock over the cadaver of their defunct and the competition of love rocks started, and it got intermixed with ants queen stuff with telepathic antennas).

You can add marvels and museums until you can't walk freely, and ruin yourself keeping all the big stuff standing and clean to eternity, they are still temporary objects, while life can be eternal. I won't say I'm against some marvels, but I'm talking historical accumulation and exaggeration, most of these things are extremely costly, and having too many can become a condemnation, and I believe we have reached that point long ago, but that goes hand in hand with this ideal that would prefer to ruin the earth building marvels to boast, than create a paradise where people are not poor, but I think I don't have to repeat that the priorities of this reality don't make sense. Anyway, the best use of objects is found in your home.

And isn't it what's happening in the old place of gods, Greece, a strong religious place that one, with many ridiculously rich "gods" in museums of luxury, almost worst than Rome with its Vatican, sorry. Anyway, whatever the fantastic amount of money in the place, its economy is failing, and the solution is to lower the standard of living of the poorer people to get the economy back on track; you can't increase much the basis of living in this reality, particularly with so many rich peoples and old objects to protect at all cost, big and impressive ones at that. Isn't a big part of our "modern" system invented by a bunch of Greek guys? Socrates and Democrate or something; it's not going well these days, eh? As for old marvels, don't worry, you don't need those to ruin a country, politicians and princesses living in luxury and having tons of advantages is enough... What you need to know is that big thing and marvels don't create money, they transfer it from one place to the other in the competition of who takes the most, they cost money instead, that's the truth, whatever there are a billion tourists spending a trillion dollars to see it, it is still an expensive cost, like many luxury object and houses of the rich.

Now, this history modifies the people walking among it, you learn it at school, you make nationalism out of it etc. If you preserve it too long, you condemn people to some unconscious way, and life don't like that for too long, move! People in America didn't move their history and temples here (well, some), they gave birth to new ways and morphed their languages, and guess what? Not only they survived but they thrived.

Yet, you must preserve history because that's what you know of your recipe, but history is not objects, it's a true story, that's totally different, you can affect and limit your mind negatively a lot, even if you think the contrary in your cultural view, by continually walking through publicized historical objects. Dig to find the truth, but you're not supposed to make museums with all traces of humanity you found, it would amount to someone collecting, keeping and exposing everywhere in its house, everything of a dead loved one, and a civilization is not supposed to ruin itself taking care of old cosmetic structures, particularly if they are structures that emphasis PMBBD.

I just don't understand who decided spending a ruining amount of resources to make a historical museum world was more important than caring for people. I'm exaggerating a little, nothing wrong with proudly spending some money for keeping some old things standing that got good signification, but for now it's mostly wasted money for a limited category of people who like and have the means to run around the globe to see it, not me, doing tourism all over the world in co2, seeing old structures once in their life for a Wow! Transferring money from one place to the other in the country competition, filling the pockets of some rich that profit from it while the stuff will need constant care while it won't last 10 000 years in the hands of life and in country competition wars, or tourists for that matter, unless you're stupid enough to make schemas of those things to rebuild them to eternity, or rebuild them out of plastic, a plastic Parthenon anybody? Well, you could recycle it...

Preserving the value of old history can be well done today with computers, we are at that epoch, and we got billions of all kind of books about history, many contradicting each other, we learn from those, find examples, justifications and that's starting to make a lot of history. Why are historical objects so important? Because some people made of those a profit and superiority thing with tourism and nationalism, and they pressured people emotively to consider such objects as critically important to their life, creating hype and propaganda for attachment; doesn't work with me, even if you tell me something is wrong in my head.

Yet, whatever you base your view on old things and doubtful history, a new land is a new land, and old stuff of an old land is not supposed make people of a new land jealous. Keep true history and stop and don't go nuts shining old objects, it's unhealthy. Spend tons of money to make 3D version of historical objects, which are often worse than inutilities, that's more than humanity needs.

Personally I never visited a museum and neither a marvel, except some natural and living things that I'd preserve at great cost...And I don't feel bad or deficient for it, I didn't die out of it, there are infinitively more important things to me; when I'll walk in a fair reality without wars and misery, then I'll be proud to give more priority to this, for now, they are things I can easily ignore, particularly for the symbol most carry and the condemning use made of them.

We'll preserve history, and we'll have whole cultural cities full of museums and historical structures, but our priority is our growth. It is already complex and expensive doing the new reality, we won't make a museum out of every impressive structure that gets inside our territory. You preserve what you want in your reality and we'll preserve what we want in ours. If you want to spend money preserving the Eiffel tower forever, go ahead, but for a long time, the best the life reality will be able to do is having a few teams of experts that will do their best at 3D digitalizing in surreal quality a maximum of old things everywhere before we develop the place our way, and yes we'll eventually build marvels for the fun of it too, but surely not at the beginning, for us the greatest marvels are flower cities, and our 3D museums will be quite a walk too. Our emphasis will be to keep anything fitting in a computer and that's probably the best we can do for some time, while not forgetting that supposedly independent cultural societies are supposed to care for their own culture... Father reality preserve its stuff in its own way, and when we'll have the population and credits circulation basis, we'll take over most the job of caring for big international stuff, and remove the job of excavating the true history of old from father if he wants to save the money, which is kind of a ridiculous tradeoff for all what he's done until now, but we'll try to show gratitude.

For old monuments, I say bash down fences, stop profiting and let children play around, just mark unsafe areas without exaggeration, the funniest places are often the more dangerous ones, and accidents always happens, get used to it. If it was just for me, since I don't like the signification of many of these structures, I'd personally take a heavy mace and get a week's worth of workout for the pleasant show of a crumbling pillar I crashed by myself. I'm joking, these structures are meant to show there was history there, I'll appreciate it under that form, but there are reasons to destroy history, they are cost inefficiency, taking of needed space, PMBBD, or condemning people to a mentality with the help of nationalism.

Life moves on earth, it just so happens that it took that form for some time, and in the end, what is the worth if all this historical stuff if humanity fails? Glorified proof of a wrong way or philosophy, like think big or think Democratic? When everybody of the whole planet knows who Zeus and Apollo are, you have a problem, shut-up! And the same for Tiger Woods (after the god of lightning came the god of golf), I'm not supposed to know their name by heart, even if they're the greatest people of our times. Who decide he have the right, the "liberty", to fill my head with big names? What? What must I do? What's the message? I'm supposed to get motivated? I'm supposed to admire? Become a Tiger Woods? Can't I be free of all these names and their pictures? Why are they so tremendously important to my life that I should carry their image in my head forever? I must never forget Tiger Woods, that Zeus and Apollo and Hermaphrodite and Atlas and their gang of gods will all descend on earth someday in 2012 to punish us because we forgot their name? And what god will do what to whom? Allah will be there too, yep!

All that to say that yes we'll take care for old history and marvels that will fall in our reality territory, but that may take some time, and we won't go nuts about it. And nothing will be hidden, people will have access to any history we work on live, we won't manipulate things to fit a story, if 2 things conflict with each other, then too bad, it will still be exposed, what is the truth of the pyramids? We can't know in the current state of this reality, but you can bet that if we are to dismantle a pyramid brick by brick there will be a way for anybody to circulate on the place, we may control flow rate of people with fences to skip them trampling stuff, but they'll see anything we excavate with their eyes, if we find a giant skeleton, it will be real, not a photo or video or a expert talking about it, it will be tangible and people will see the excavation.

The same for gods; I'm not much impressed by a drawing of a vessel on a cavern wall or a bible passage, and a lot of drawings we are shown as proofs could be produced presently from using old material. Life from heavens always set our imagination on fire, gods could have helped many earth animals develop better too, raised in a kind of zoo in a lush place, then set free once they were reproduced to stability, a bit like we presently do with almost extinct species, it's a possibility, and if the time and space needed is small enough, done by advanced tech guys, then our science will never even imagine the possibility, if it doesn't have to remove anything to the tree of life, because science will logically use the tree of life like it's a proof while it is not, even if it's perfect; never underestimate manipulation... It is a possibility, but that's not the probability I believe the most in, I believe more in the fly scenario for these matters, flies that drop stuff around... Evidently, I always see things in an optic of life, as a guy that doesn't doubt science ability to be totally wrong in their final truth timeline of events, planting a glaciation where there have been none...

What doesn't help me trust most scientists or archeologists is because their stuff is always hidden behind secure doors and behind fences, with some military personnel or police for a good measure of total loss of credibility, we can be fed any bullshit that way; we won't work like that, every place a archeologist or scientist work, people will be able to visit anytime, no country lines, no government. And people don't need to disturb scientists for that, we can make glass windows or fences to skip people messing with the stuff, and everything will be explained with adequacy, no need to go crazy in complexity, but there are all kind of ways to explain what's going on to interested people in sufficient understanding.

A lot will have to be explored all over again, too many people manipulated everything, there's a good science base though, and yes, that reflects a lot of professionalism and good methodology, team work and even international competence when I think of the complexity of some projects, like trying to manage fusion, even if it end-up inefficient or explodes, it's still extraordinary to me that people can do that, who needs more proof that we can do the same with systems to manage people? (yes the current system it's extraordinary at doing what it does, people do extraordinary from what I understand, life...). We'll even have to redo a lot of what we already did in space to verify our integrity, we'll have to go back to the moon, or plant a quality satellite around it, and everything will be live, no manipulators filtering the vids their way, so if an alien shows its face everybody will see him at the same time live, it won't be an old movie of shitty quality with a UFO expert that know the subject like a pro, or someone that babble insanities about stumbling into one in his back garden. The way people are going nuts with this you have to wonder where the UFO cemetery on earth is...

So it won't be our first priority to excavate treasure as we start the life reality, and it will only happen when lands fall under our jurisdiction or when we'll be good for space don't think you'll know the truth of this reality, you'll never know it as you live, Christianity ran all over the globe messing everything for its story, and the same for Capitalism, even most presidents are out of the truth. We'll still have to heavily study any piece of land that we'll gain, and I mean in detail, we're not supposed to stumble on archeological sites at this epoch, and what is this gold rush bullshit? We'll need teams of experts dedicated to this job for sure, and sorry but the pyramids will have to be left to human erosion, after science do its things and museums take their place. Evidently a culture can can slap that off my hands and decide the matter itself, in which case I'll retreat graciously to other matters...I'm just saying, human erosion shouldn't amount to much on piles this big...The same for the Noah's arch, the same for Martians, but in the end, the reality balance, with its top A&D, will enforce the total availability of the earth to research, the other reality will have to do with it, once is in place we'll go wherever we want, no building or hole on earth will be locked to us, in theory, we won't enter people's homes, and well, you can always say no, but depending on what don't be surprised if we put pressure all the way to civil unrest, and we are the only one with the weapons now. I know some see evil dictatorship here, but that comes with the contract, we're not supposed to become enemies, if so forget it immediately, so that's the deal, at some point we have to end wars for all kind of reasons, and the number one condition for the new reality is exactly that; the fair distribution of resources and lands. You'll better understand a little later.

And I'll add a note on Noah's ark; there may have been a flood, there may have been a ship, there may even have be a flying saucer, there may have been a man that saved humanity and many animals, maybe even a god helped him, but always take religious stories with a grain of salt. Christianity may have the oldest boat of humanity in its basement, a true one or one under accelerated ageing, they could even have god's flying saucer, carbon dated at it! And they may get it out for 2012 to prove that their bible is truth, while it will only prove they have a boat, whatever they fill it with a golden Jacob as a proof to get people to kneel, it will still prove nothing. Be careful of an institution that got the means to build a church in every villages, that raises billions of dollars every years, don't think they don't spend some to falsify things, there are proofs all over the place that they do.

To go back to history, it has importance for sure, but it must absolutely not be a big limit to our development, nothing wrong with a few museums, but if we condemn every places containing history someday there will be as much space for history as there will be for us or wild life while we'll prefer to spend our money for history crazies and nationalists instead of making a paradise for people and life. History can be compressed, life do it, time advancing is history, we can make it digital if we want. As for museums, they are meant to stay around the place where the physical history is taken, rich collectors have no right to take museum pieces and carry them around the world, physical history should stay around the place it existed, no voyaging around, it's not a circus.

So all museums in America that contain pieces from the other side of the world should bring them back where they belong at the expenses of the one that "stole" the items, and this is important to our reality too. When French people set foot on America, we didn't bring France history with us, we saw the land as a new place to make history. Furthermore, as I already said, you're not supposed to take territory unfairly, then associate the history of a kind of people to it for condemnation, that is a guarantee of eternal war as the only way for other kind of people to have a fair place is with violence, surely not peace.

Now without saying that everything is history, I say the only option for the country competition war implanted history, for the life reality to make its principles of fairness work for lands redistribution, will be to protect history in museums and concentrate it in one point when we'll have the means. Concentration for French people in America, mainly mean Quebec City. Quebec City, which is the oldest city in America, is only 400 years old, yet Quebeckers, even if we're becoming a cultural mess, are strongly attached to it and its historical value is tremendous. I could say Montreal, but that city is inadequate under that form for us.

Why will we have to concentrate racial history? As I'll explain later, territory fairness principles imply that such a land as the province of Quebec will not be limited to a single culture existing as protected. The ultimate goal is to find the equilibrium in cultural population number efficiency at developing at a massive scale versus land space. What is massive population of a single cultural society? What is the appropriate land development strategy that will permit as many as possible such massive entities to exist while not being too close to each other? My guess is that for a land like the province of Quebec, there could develop as many as around 7 different masses of people, there is only one presently, Quebeckers, and Indian reserves definitively don't qualify as massive, even if they should if things were fair and we shared, but they will get massive in the life reality. So there are overwhelming races that will have to get far smaller; past a certain point it is worthless to have more people, almost no cultural benefits except history, and almost no differences development benefits. And even if there is some, there would be far more with a weird tribe grown to mass. Whatever we do we'll want to preserve current historical strengths, but space with people and history will have to be made virgin for new potential to develop. When someone moves in, you clear your stuff from the place, and clean it, it becomes his place.

Now, since our reality will work very differently, since there won't be wars between people anymore, since lands will be divided fairly, new cultural societies will build a strong cultural history at the place they'll live since the time slab of existence of these places won't be disturbed by war making them last far longer, creating very strong attachment between the people and the lands.

Fourth is language, which can become quite a problem since implementing it as a cultural value can multiply their number almost infinitively. But this is a factor we cannot skip, even if you cannot drop your heavy paw in languages without making a mess. Yet, like everything, it is a land where evil can influence and profit, in fact that's the exact ground from which PMBBD is created, which, in turn, manipulates and modifies the language. So it is imperative to have strong reality influences and limiting laws, if not, every gang will mix itself a language by throwing sound effects, shortcuts and twistings everywhere, and that make all languages a reality thing to some extent. It's hard to judge things like that; there was a time where that was not even a question...

One thing's for sure, a different language is an excellent component of any new ideological will to form new cultural entities. And it will be so, people will learn their culture language, and they will be strongly encouraged to learn an international language, (just writing can work) and both will morph in differences as time advances. But the primary language development will have to be protected, so each cultural society grouping will have to protect its language development to keep it different. What I mean is that Chinese stays Chinese, and if the international language is English, then the main morphing will take place there (English version of Chinese). Now, with the normal and flower city principle, there will be many strong variations of English all understandable between each other.

You somewhat understand the goal, so things may be modified to reach the goal as knowing how languages will evolve is quite unpredictable. What we absolutely don't want is language assimilation, that's the priority, the international language is not an absolute necessity for everybody, but it still attaches the whole reality together. The other advantage of English for the international spot is the easier learning curve which can be managed by a maximum of people. I started writing with very basic understanding of it, I was terrible, but well, I had to begin somewhere. Its presence eases its learning too, so we must not put too much pressure to learn it or we could overwhelm other languages that have priority in self-preservation. Yet, I'll add that for reality's uses and association needs, we want a maximum of people learning English easily, and sticking to writing is still appropriate for the "international" uses, and it goes well in hands with learning a simple and large basis of reality you can personally specialize from as you reach adulthood.

There is one thing though, the other extreme of these languages sound extremely bad. British English is the language that I like hearing the less, I don't know what happened that made those language transform like that but we will chose another language, maybe Brazilian, if we can't be sure of English or French stability. And the problem is not just that it sound unbelievably bad, but I have a hard time understanding what they say too even if I know all the words, while I understand U.S English perfectly. What is it? A mutation? That applies to their movies too, sorry but English movies are so vastly overrated to me that I'm certain that they pay to get good reviews, or the system is corrupt, because even if I subtract 2 stars from all their reviews to have a realist idea if I'm gonna waste my time or not, I still end-up regretting. It's not only a matter of language here, it's a matter that I find b movies better, so why the five stars? There are exceptions evidently, sure that 007 doesn't compare to a b movie, but I still don't like 007 movies, mostly because it's too twisted. The same applies to Batman.

The other thing is that while cultural societies deal with their own languages in their own ways, and that includes English, the reality must control the wrongs of it concerning masses too. So you can have a weird English cultural language, but at the reality level, it is a straighter language using the same fundamentals.

One of the reasons, apart association, to have an international language, is to have the language equivalent of the basis principle of the reality, made of idealism, principles, truth, minimal word twisting, straight, but that doesn't mean ugly words don't exist, they're all there, as short version if the writing language evolve as such. The dictionary doesn't need to be big for the basis, we want a quick one everybody can easily learn, but specialties will have big dictionaries with words as long and complex as they want, as long as they are not twisted words. I'm imagining an ideal here evidently, as for the words themselves, whatever they are cute or ugly, the definition will be as complex as necessary, we'll want to stop the short meaning emphasis of current dictionaries, some words need a whole page to be described well, and we'll need to remove a bunch of associations that twist the meaning itself, some words almost means 10 things that conflict with each other, we can limit that a little. The synonym dictionary will have to be remade to the same standard.

Now all that is an ideal, a goal, and one goal is to limit mass spreading of wrong associations or twists. As for cultural societies, they can have an impossibly complex or vast language if they want, and words exchange between languages is all-right and happens whatever I say, in fact, there's an interesting concept here that I think I like where the international language could feed from other languages to gain more diversity and precision, thus further limiting the need to pile definitions on words, and that's without mentioning the science that will definitively need more vocabulary, and synonyms are allright as long as they evidently related. The international language can become quite big with synonyms that way, as long as it keep integrity of meanings.

Learning institutions and communication structure will help, and since we are at the digital age the thickness of the dictionary doesn't matter anymore, so we'll define everything adequately, and even if the description is not perfect and take 2 pages, we'll do it in its true meaning and limitations with examples.

Language wars is more of a common thing than it looks, all what a human do in association "start" by words, someday it won't be a language against another one, it will become the civil war of languages, languages fighting within themselves to gain back the true significations of words...Maybe not.

Fifth is the chosen one, and we will choose that one as our fundamental reason. Mainly, it means independent people deciding. This is to break the spell where you're born on a spot then adapt to it, your choice in vast majority decided by a gang or a profit structure, and where the illusion of independence you have come from unconscious PMBBD and means condemnation. In our reality, you'll have different groupings protection level where you'll experiment and develop your own cultural ways.

Presently I believe there are no good enough reasons to have more than a handful of what it sees as "cultures" (not races), as the rest are surely extremes or exaggerations resulting from competing gangs with godly ideals, conflicts in self-protection paranoia. For us, cultures will simply be the way people will develop over time on a protected place with difference as a goal, even if you can copy and modify all you want.

Now, all that may seem hard to understand, but it's harder to talk about or invent. So as you already know that's what the association of culture and race will be to us as a global system view of associated people; a cultural society (you name them like countries...).

For now I must repeat that there are always exceptions, and even if we can have an idea of the future from present knowledge, our mind must not be limited to that. As an example, if dolphins suddenly start popping out arms, legs and start shouting between themselves while chopping trees at the chainsaw, developing such mutations en masses without scientists help, by themselves, they may have an enclave, a somewhat 100 km expanse, but that is contrary to what would want most people who dream of mixing everybody for civilization homogeneity, while embarking them in the sex revolution of "love" preferably, which definitively doesn't work for us, so if such an eventuality happens, they will have a place and they will have to stick to it. They can work and play tourist everywhere all they want, as long as they are not a chore and don't start competing to take over the world, by whatever means. We are the builders of reality on earth and we can't reproduce with dolphins, but scientists may be intelligent enough to scrap our genetics with their experiments for a pay and final truth pressures, and the minimum of "class" to have is to leave a planet with a future to life.

The same for extraterrestrials, they can have an enclave (you can see them as a new society) if they want to experience life on earth, but they have no right to impose thing to us, if they come here on a scrapped vessel or without fuel, they'll have to totally forget about going back home until we are on a second planet. If they start the pressure to expand or go back home we will exterminate them to the last without an afterthought. If they behave, we'll do everything to protect them until we meet their civilization, in which case they'll have many interesting stories to tell, then we'll trade things like viruses, and if their civilization didn't survive we'll keep them like that until we can drop them on a virgin system, and that's their last chance, unless they're too useful and are ready to accept their limited situation forever; we won't collect failed high consciousness species for the fun of it, but we like to adjust bad luck a little, so we give a chance or 2 sometimes, help is appreciated btw.

Planet societies are high consciousness species thing, which is related to all life on the planet at the moment of implementation, it's a terrible and critically dangerous process where both entities morph into one interdependent thing, we are at the beginning of that process and immediately failing. The planet is the land of life and the universe is the land of high consciousness, if you can't survive, you're lucky to have a second chance. The ultimate extrapolation of this is a chance at universal influence, which we are trillions years away from attaining with many monsters (mental like vampires and physical like predators) to kill in our path...

That may be hair raisingly far-fetched in the future of little possibilities, but we must think of these things before they are dropped on us, you know what happens when we act without thinking first or with a think ego limited and fearful mind. You don't want extraterrestrials to act condescending with us, and you don't want to show them how condescending we can be. Yet, we may be alone in the galaxy, we must not forget that, in which case we better take care of those civil dolphins, just don't let ants take over the place though...

The recipe for pure cultural society creation to fill our space is simple; gang together on enough differences, reach enough adepts, get yourself a language, be ready to form a community, then you'll eventually be given a spot to develop inside the reality. You can try to ask for a specific starting place, but anyway you'll develop it and the land differently in your language, in your ways.

We won't clear cultural entities that fit in our definition of things though, and for the smaller ones we'll prefer to make a particular effort to reach their hand and develop their place if they hold to it, but I don't autosuggest that it should be that way, some may just be tired of their place and they may seize the opportunity to take a more conformable spot on earth to grow mass, and yes, they may keep ancestry bubbles... Yes I'm talking about another unimaginable option you never thought could exist with humans at the helm. The limit will mainly be expansion and population limits. We will want to have space for new cultural societies wanting to form communities and care for pieces of lands. Evidently we may need lots of time and expansion before many societies can do it.

Nothing wrong if we genetically engineer other reproductive forms of life too, even ourselves, but no for clones or zoos, so if we are to bring back the Neanderthal to life, then we'll have to do it as a diverse mass of Neanderthals, maybe 1000, and they'll have to reproduce naturally, forming a new society capable of acting civilized. They go to prison if they rape a girl or act violent like everybody else, since they say the type shouldn't be any different than us in their understanding of genetics... It's a matter of potential, we don't want morons or stumbling drunks that will get a life of misery or scrutiny, it's either animal, or the potential to act civilized and become equals, even if they may be limited to a 250Km2 expanse with fair resources, like we'd do in the scenario of having an alien civilization wanting a piece of the earth and we're good enough to oblige, but aliens seems more interesting to me than Neanderthals. As for extinct animals we'll want resuscitated, they'll have to take a natural place in an ecosystem, it will be illegal if it is to create pets or zoos in the name of profits, so no dinosaurs if they can't live naturally without destroying others species, if they do, then maybe you could tame them and get your pet dinosaur. Anyway, those think big scientists never mention the environment in their dinosaur dreams, they would only succeed at getting the smaller ones to live since the bigger ones were at the extreme of living in a different environment, such dinosaurs would live short lives of constant discomfort, in the name of profits on the back of stupid tourists in bullshit "love" with life and animals or wanting to take a selfie with a dinosaur, a suffering dinosaur can do, as long as it is living.

There can be different ways to attach to the life reality, but it is the basic, hassle free, way you're supposed to all endorse. Cultural societies will be the most different entities to function under an agglomeration of will, and they will color our reality in all kind of ways. Still, it may be possible that some may want to express more profound differences while still being under the basic way of the reality and they will be permitted as long as they have the arguments.

Like countries in this reality, cultural societies can carry flags in our reality, if they want to, but I don't think we should accept any flags from father reality, which have been mostly used for competition and racism and yes, nationalism, even if some kind of design relation could be acceptable (nationalism can have good aspects, and it is a critical part of this reality, without it things would have failed, it's just that it's become like a vindictive competition thing and I don't like it, but the concept can encourages something better as an ideal). Some cultures may express their differences through clothing too, whatever that is, priest robes? No problem if it's not ridiculous, and I'll even mention that the way clothing and cosmetics has taken an important role in our life, I could place this as a positive aspect that some societies can develop, but such grade robes will have to be well designed and studied, with a large enough avenue of future style development, as people fit themselves with the style, I just don't like bad taste, another option is some spread details.

Now, one thing's for sure; there won't be national hymns in our reality, such songs are PMBBD, I'm so disgusted from hearing the "OH Canada" that I almost get violent every time I hear it! Some dress code will have to be made for many jobs where people need to identify someone easily, I'm not strong associating colors to things, but people make the difference, they don't actually stop right there when they see something red, but we'll prefer this dress code to be reality wide, as taking the best amalgam of it that all countries developed until now, except pastel stuff for kids, or pastel stuff for kid stuff. We will eventually want the same level of diversity as father reality in clothing, except we'll cut the crap, for a long time at least. I'm talking about big and expensive fashion shows that "creates" museum stuff, and I like nothing of it btw, all the way to the rotten mentalities that pullulate behind the scene. Objects we don't invent right now don't always disappear with the one that thought about it. This not critical to our survival and a lot of what is created so expensively may be created without notice later; some just found an opportunity to gang for profit. I'll add that we will not sexualize youth on purpose, no pressure, but we'll encourage dress diversity as much as possible.

In the end, whatever the way it is done, we must start with a city which I'll describe a bit later. For now, to better explain how we'll somewhat see cultural entities development, I'll simply say that we'll start with an experimental city where 4 of them will be given a part to develop. I'll call that a flower city, even if for now, the explications I'll give are better imagined as a cake separated in 4 parts. If a part of the American "soul" or ideal is multiculturalism, then we won't make a mess of injustice out of it, we'll stop talking through our hats and we'll seek the systematization of it.

First, I don't care the whites had an attitude that permitted them to develop as superior people, other races, probably most of them, could have done the same if alone on earth, they would have done things and discoveries later or earlier, compared to another racial difference, that's all; civilization raises from systematization which come about one day or the other if high consciousness exists. Maybe the best version of father reality would have arisen from an Indian tribe if they would have had another 1000 years, maybe their attitude would have permitted them to skip some civilization threatening things, who knows? So I am against racial, or territory, or language overwhelming, and as you already know the emphasis will be for everybody to learn 2 languages, the international one used to connect and traduce is a secondary language, meaning it is learned many years after the cultural one is learned.

I'll start this part by saying that it is just a suggestion, an example, as to how it would be possible to have very different groups of people working together and develop through many thousands of years. They must not become the same over time, they must increase or keep differences, and new ones must appear. My vision of things work toward these goal, it is an enforcement to it, it is not meant to keep actual people as they are in peace, but to slowly change them to reveal new possibilities. My vision of the enforcement of such differences, what I call a "cultural society" may not be the best, I don't know, but I believe that the protection structure for developing differences is mostly right.

A cultural entity is considered as such when it fills at least 3 solid criteria out of a few ones. Evident language break-up is a necessity, a physical or genetic difference is a big plus, and a will for a creativity difference, which can be entertainment, imagination, or even needs or utility, or a big scientific adventure. The effect of different language is can easily be compared to a genetic difference, over a very long time languages morph and somewhat change the people.

We will seek to protect evident genetic and language differences. The worst thing we can do to different people is to standardize them or assimilate or ridicule or incarcerate them. If a country tries to do this, like Canada, it should be resized smaller than the ones they are attacking, in theory. This attitude cannot be accepted anymore, wars are justified for such reasons, not for conquest but for control, to limit or incapacitate conquerors or those who think of themselves as the superior race in a competition of traits to grow as much as they can while making reserves of other diversities. We are not in medieval times anymore, and systematic ego competition ends with the life reality.

Evident language breakup is one of the main criteria. That may cause a problem for Canadians and Americans and British and Australians English whites, if they have no other differences than little language details and cosmetic stuff like differently painted police cars or an inverted driving wheel, they'll have to be considered as one since they only fill the will to develop cultural difference as an argument to be considered as a different entity, and you need far more, but maybe 2 cultural societies could be made here, a British-Canadian-Australian one (put that in the right order for ABC), and an American one. French Quebeckers may be in the same kind of situation when compared with France French, maybe not, we understand ourselves very well but we absolutely not talk the same, yet, we are limit at that difference, and the genetic evident difference doesn't seem to exist but I don't know, that could eliminate 1 option. Next we are different in our attitude and developed our own "culture" in entertainment, sport, and artistry; you can somewhat see this the same way as the language breakup. And finally, we've got many scientific emphasizes. As you can see, it is evident that it will be a load of troubles separating cultures like that, so the best way to do it, once you got 4 valid cultural societies to start the reality, would be to make a global A&D group to decide things better, but the basic idea is there.

For now, the simplest way to do things is to get a genetic factor of around 75% strength shared by those people as one valid point, and don't come jump on me too fast, divided people of this reality will go kaput for anything I'll say; they don't have enough of a mess to play with in their reality, they'll absolutely want to put their nose in our things. You have your reality! This one is not the same! It works differently! I don't change your reality; you're supposed to do it, go ahead! I make a new reality, you have not a word to say about it, I surely won't recreate your reality because you want everybody equals or the same in unfairness, your place is your place, you don't protest against an aliens civilization because they don't let you overwhelm them with your culture, they do things differently, do with it! Go vote! Complain and compete in the reality you always encouraged and defended, don't kill the life reality in the egg with your competitive mentality. We will select people genetically, discriminatorily, and you will shut-up!

Next, all different languages that presently exist are a valid point, except slight differences, and that will be a lot of diversity to implant for a long time since there may be more than a thousand of them, which means there is a minimum of a thousand cultural entities to protect under fairness principles and they are all over the place and we don't want to move them too much.

Yet, you got to reach a certain level of technology and knowledge implementation to gain a more global vision, you don't ask a tribe living in the forest to go international, they need to grow and face problems that invalidate some of their views so they lose grip with the sacred tree. When a tribe grows beyond 10 000 individuals, its view changes, it got new tools, new ways of running things, and from that they can divide to form new tribes but the problem is that we're in 2000, forget expansion all over the place, and the tools level available, if we give them total liberty because we're "good" can permit them to take over the world, so they got to accept the best systematization of reality that exist, like everybody else.

And they're not supposed to want to stay tribes or , they have to contribute to the life adventure and that include changing their minds, developing technology, machines, and going to other planets. If they don't want to do that then they have no use to life, life don't want useless tribes, so it is imperative that we leave no tribe with a language of its own alone in the forest, we must "bubble" them in the new reality until they understand better. If they absolutely don't want to, then we leave them to the Democracy Capitalism business, and our emphasis in such a situation will be to send a bunch of language specialists to copy their language instead, and if we eventually get a sufficient mass of people with differences they can choose that language and develop it if they see its potential, learn it to gain the right to develop as a new cultural society.

But we'd definitively prefer the tribe to take the life reality challenge, associating their territory, doing their little business in peace for a thousand years to free their minds from harsh necessities, and nobody will trample their history no more. It is evident that it will be a challenge to them, but we're not profiteers, even if their territory becomes a life reality thing, they keep their living place and we will deal with the territory in function of what is important to them and the emphasis will switch to make them full functional citizens, even if that will take some time, but they'll be capable of living from the basis principle for a minimal start, under a form that's appropriate and can change with time. Evidently this is still quite invading, so again we'll need the whole gamut of expertise in everything to do things well. That's the ideal, in reality we won't force things, how many tribes with a worthy language are left anyways? And nobody likes to receive an arrow, so if they're angry we leave them alone and it will be illegal to interact with them.

And I know some will go nuts and say they're supposed to stay lost tribes in the woods, but that's totally ridiculous; if you don't go ask them what they want then you don't know, and leaving them in ignorance of evolution tools is a crime, it's just that this stupid reality would not be capable of skipping exploiting them, profiting from them and competing them, all the help would be biased, so yes you're as well leave them alone and look at them like they're in a quaint zoo because you are incompetent and you'd fail everything and make a worse zoo reserve, or you'd go kaput about their ways of governing themselves, send in the blue helmets and institute Democracy-Capitalism as the best system. I'm exaggerating, still, even if you think you're a benevolent savior for not interacting with them, your effect is worst because you're doing the god strolling around in planes, totally messing-up their mind, and you're scrapping the planet and exploiting everything while condemning them and leaving them ignorant of it, and it doesn't even matter, because they are imprisoned and on survival defensive, surely not in an expanding scenario of conquest.

Anyway, it all comes down to the word "differences", everything is there, you have to cumulate a difference weight as a group of individuals. You can do it with simple laws like I'm explaining for evident ones or at first, but at some points we'll be better with an A&D group to help people decide what is worth how many points; like language is worth 100 points and then people decide if the language difference is worth the full 100 points or just 70, once a group cumulate 1000 points of difference, they can form a new society, but you got to concentrate on the most important values of differences by forcing a minimum to them. As for the size of the starting group, around 7 000 is good enough to start as something like a big village. Yet, it is too easy to throw anything on the "difference" pile and shout hurrah! That's why I developed this vision, knowing a big diet difference may fit a criteria.

If you want another example of a valid difference, while not forgetting that some are going to fail, would be to see 12 digits counting as such. A vast group may decide to count by 12 or 9, and it is not the only way mathematics can be different, you can reinvent the whole expression of numbers, or even try to learn binary mathematics instead, or mathematics without 0. So, you'd create arguments for it, like saying you want to count spiritual universal by adding 2 numbers as whole, ten and eleven. You want to add man and woman to numerology signification. My dad built a house counting inches and feet and it worked, the doors open and close well. We've got 12 months, 24 hours. And I think in old antiquity some civilizations dumped counting on their fingers, erased the thing and counted by twelve, and if some powerful guy didn't invent the 10 commandments (a lot wrong and many missing, but it's a round number that you can count with your fingers) we would have no use for a religious god day that break this logic; you already know that in our reality, a week is 6 days. I guess counting by 10 started by people counting on their fingers; 9 fingers of two hands for 90 makes it easier for counting when you're young, and that's probably why counting by 10 was enforced because it is easier at the beginning, or for children. If the reason for 10 digits is not 10 fingers, then what? Because you can place 0 as an exposant at any point, why not at 5? Will someone tell me why some went for 12 instead of 10, civilizations separated by continents coming to the same logic? Why didn't they find it better to count on their fingers? Today, in our limited ways we believe counting by twelve is bad but is it? Why does time count better by 60 seconds, 60 minutes? Maybe a lot of things would become easier, like high level math, or more logic in our minds if we started counting by 12? Maybe our unconscious, our whole life is more attached to math than we think and all kind of instabilities and twisting spring from unnecessary complexities of stuff transformed to 10. And that may be why we started adding tens at thirteen? Why not firstteen and secondteen for eleven and twelve while we did it for all the rest? You can find many good reasons for counting by 12 while there is none for 10 except 10 fingers...

My father builds things with inches and foots without much of an education. I helped around and he instinctively, without a calculator or paper, deducts more complex equations that his friends with more education who make far more money in this reality than him. They're jealous of the house he built, it's not a castle, but it shows excellent wood and stone working in my opinion, for the time and situation (couldn't finish his vision on the house on that, too many things to do and I didn't help, but the whole family at some point was doing is pure Minecraft in action) he rarely makes a mistake in his way of calculating while they pass their time on calculators verifying their thing over and out while still making mistakes and wasting tons of wood; that helps my tendency to believe we are made to count by 12. What does counting by 12 changes to scientific math? Nothing, 12 divided by 2 is still 6, and it will always be. What I think will change will mostly happen when people will start using that mathematical "language" massively to the point of having widespread scientific calculators for it. Medium to high level math may become easier to learn because the unconscious would be more directly connected to facts of life, and that can lead to new, more powerful and stable math in the very long run from newfound non-conflicting ease with it. Evidently, I'm just supposing stuff but I don't believe it can be a bad thing, and if we meet an alien civilization that counts by 12 or something like that, we'll have the experience of how to deal with it, we may even have calendars and calculators ready, thanks to a cultural society that made it one of its attribute...

I wouldn't do that for the new reality though, you'd need traduced calculators before starting building the new reality, if there's a big base of it maybe, but a mistake in the transformed formulas could have devastating effects, and we'd have to teach it in schools too right from the start which means a serious level of expertise. I don't know, maybe we'd be better doing such a thing, if we really want it, slowly after the basic self-sufficiency industrial structure have been made, but before complex industrial and research starts. Still, it would probably be best to do it right at the beginning and build everything from it, traducing along the way everything that is "imported" from the father reality, acting like we're reverse engineering stuff from an alien civilization and building our own from the translation.

As for calculators, they have always been critical to all phases of development of humanity, whatever the form. Unless you're old, there is something wrong with you if you don't have one at home. Humanity can die and there will be calculators laying everywhere if you want to do some math about it, they are good tools and they easily free the mind of people for other things. Yet, there wouldn't be a calculator without a mathematician, so their worth is fantastic, a high level mathematician is one of the most precious person who can contribute to the elevation of a civilization. They understood that in antiquity and we tend to forget their worth today, they're not show-off singers seeking popularity so we don't give them much importance even if they are the foundation of everything that exist, we're salivating too much for entertainment gods presently. I hope our reality will permit the identification of potential high level ones early in life.

Mathematics are a specialization or an expertise that people need, and what people that pass their time developing other expertise or specialties need is powerful associated expertise or specialization and calculators is the transformation of such expertise as a widespread tool available to everybody. I like to have a 20$ high level mathematician in my pocket, even if I can't understand half of what he's saying, and that's what most people need to learn as a basis; basic math and the use of the calculator. Now, I'm not sure it's a good idea to make 12 digits a basis for our reality, but I believe a few different mathematical structures or basis is a worthy difference to explore over time, some cultural societies may try the experience, building all their things and making all their math from it.

Language, mathematics, and ways of doing things (cultural development), if we stay within the limits of our liberties, can open plenty of new possibilities, but they will show their true extent after thousands years, like life, and that's the spirit our scientists will need to study our ways, and I personally think that whatever I say, good people with a good mind just see, so whatever my spirituality, I'm pretty sure I'll have a big bunch of them in, even if they are limited differently. They can do a lot within these limits, they can develop lists of experimental projects, in genetic too, even if there's some bad effects, we have to gain the science, even of cloning, we will do clones, but solely to gain the knowledge of how to better deal with the evils of it; as I already said you can't live without evil, but such evils can be taken as a society, and you never know, there are all else fail scenarios... So drastic interventions on genetics, or extreme chemicals, and anything that is at risk of affecting life globally, must be experimented in confined space until we are certain of their effects. Cows are a successful example, they won't affect wild life or take over the whole planet if we are minimally careful, there are many successes, mainly gained luckily, but chemicals are a failure in many instances, even if a vast majority don't cause problems if used without exaggeration.

The aquarium test is a good start, but you don't have all life-forms that can eat the molecule in there. We must test things through life before throwing it everywhere, and wait a long time to be sure, for stability, but it's too late for that as most chemicals, molecules and genetic modifications have already been thrown everywhere at the megaton. The other thing you don't know if your stuff will not suddenly die by meeting a developing life limiting factor in a thousand year (like a new molecule, the inverse of a virus spread), in which case you lose both what you created and what you overwhelmed. That applies to humans too, I know some would be too happy to clean our "dirty" DNA, or make superior humans, but all these differences I try to emphasis the development of may have their equivalent working system in us, whatever their developing form look like sicknesses to some, or garbage to others...

The thing that we must be careful about is the degenerative possibility of reproducing boosted facets at the cost of other facets, which may develop not only genetic sicknesses, but condemnations too from blind pressure selection. Yet, isn't it the responsibility of the culture to stay appropriate? We don't want freaks, like ego freaks, so I repeat that the vision is not a pressure, you live and do your things and someday you're more of a little different, we want citizens that, in principle, can go anywhere and take the attitude of the place, and not look ridiculous, but yes, it may come to be that some people look a bit like elves, and you can always get plastic surgery, and I guess freaks don't have to be the most visible part of one's society.

There are things I may have overlooked, I put mathematics as a possible example of differences that can develop positive, or at least not negative, aspects to the life of people, but I can't think of everything, and adaptation to an environment is an enforced one. An emphasis of attitude differences between sexes can be acceptable, as long as natural reproduction works, genetics to some extent, and extremes in all else fail scenarios. You can have different ways of deciding things too, experiment modified aspects of A&D, testing your results against reality, different education strategies and emphasizes, the same for the reward system, the way money is dealt with, anything that has a serious potential to change reality for the better is an option, as long as the basis of comfort principle is kept. My view of things is not a condemnation, if a better systematization gets proven by a culture with time, then we'll change to implement it... We won't accept any option that worsen the situation of the people though, knowing we can always go back a happy self-accepted slavery kind of society... It's a question of good and evil, of fairness and more.

The same if the difference you want to develop or protect is in conflict with life ways, we don't want to grow long term problems, that's why I interdict religions to jump in the fray; you almost saw an opportunity there, eh? It's always the same reason, return where you come from a few pages earlier. Even if some parts of PMBBD can be useful to help people, with some hype for a placebo effect, everywhere on everything it just scramble the shit out of brains that already struggle on many aspects of living in reality, it reinforce problematic attitudes, dependences and serves to exploit people while limiting their minds, you must act and think independently, not from PMBBD or indoctrination, you're not a game of influences and pressures. Even languages are limit at that, a big part of them can carry PMBBD, but they are still mainly following the ways of the attitude of people which can be under external PMBBD influences long enough it is reflected in languages. The problem is initial PMBBD systemized for profit, that's where everything starts, profiting, then with lots of time language take the form to better fit.

Again it all comes to the same result, evil people are those who can't or don't care, who dream of possession or control or exploitation resulting in unfair situations, worse when they defend their attitude with bullshit. Nothing is "evil" by itself, even PMBBD, it is always people who make things "evil" (unless you think things make people evil, or what's the new wave again? People are not evil, only their actions are, (then we should imprison these evil actions...)).

Now, to add value to new cultural societies, we will try to associate them to long term science projects, the best would be for each to take care and develop a possible culture associated science facet for a start. It doesn't mean cultural societies are limited in their science exploration, people learn what they want and change culture if they want, but a grouping may have everything except such a science facet, and so the reality can make the effort of finding science emphasis choices for them and the culture may decide to choose one, or do it themselves. The goal is to start them straight in science, research and development, a very serious thing, forcing their education to that level, with a specialty. I say straight, but it's still a big adaptation thing, probably not a walk in the park to get everything working well, but that's another specialty the reality will have to provide, help in bottleneck situations, which should pass through the same kind of high level expertise I wrote about earlier. Oh, and always relativize and try to think "around slight exponential", all the way to top A&D, fairness is super hard to judge, efficiency and speed is valuable, so everybody must put a drop of water in its wine to make things work. From that, their culture, through time, can develop all kind of heavy specificities, not necessarily science, but related or using their learning structures in part.

I should add that there is nothing to stop some to become super experts at strange things through their education, like magic tricks, which they may have more abilities for, which can be seen as a science facet (don't keep your expertise and knowledge to yourself though). So you can make any cultural combo, but they must be well done, seen far in the future, you must believe you'll develop valuable diversity and you have the critical mass necessary to be born. All that is action, movement, work; you must take the means within reality limitations, like you did for father reality, often in blood.

What would still better would be to have this technological expertise associated to a maximum of projects related to it, evidently, develop a big and complex specialty that will act like a constant bonus, like a trademark that bring pride and a bonus something, like a golden age, and other cultural societies will have to help toward that too, even if nothing prevents them to have local markets all they want. Resources or food getting transformed on the spot, with some top tech facet and industries related to it (micro reality?).

My definition is again an ideal, for now, a Chinese is a Chinese, you don't need to break your head in four to see it is a worthy difference, and there are a hundred or more that are evident, enough troubles for a long time.

All kind of artists and creative people are important to grow in our reality too, creative work and imagination is where everything starts, where we express a lot of who and how we are versus how we'd like to envision ourselves; that's why I'll give entertainment development a critical value to cultural differences, but I don't think I need much arguments to defend that one, more like a repositioning of its value and view.

First, culture is nobody's monopoly, and surely not an entertainment and dancing circus of sports fan. Television have made of culture an entertainment thing, throwing themselves cultural advancement awards to and fro in happiness overdrive for the hype they create and the loads of PMBBD they feed people with, particularly children.

A big part of the job is done by the newsman indoctrination procedures, like separating culture as an apart thing in news where you see some women brandishing their homosexual behind culture like a superiority; the evolution of the groupie mind I guess, thinking only of running after entertainment and museums while almost singing they are culturally superior. Others think history is culture or that they are making history through their culture version, even calling their award "genie" awards, like genie is an entertainment thing. Is culture an artist possession? For me it somewhat means the differences that attach a vast group of people together, and art is only a fraction of that, art is art, it is not culture, artists are nuts these days, they think they are superior or have all right as long as they appose the "art" sticker. In fact, I'm creating a new human culture; will you give me a big trophy for it? Round up those artists and sportsmen filling their pants with trophies, including the Laliberty clown, and in the name of fairness, make them distribute trophies to everybody involved in human culture, but I'm just joking in half.

Music groups and entertainment groups will work the same way they do, making shows everywhere, but each cultural society worth the name will develop unique permanent self-productions of entertainment, this is very important, each culture must have self-made somewhat different entertainment, a culture of entertainment if you want to see it that way. We won't have reality or racial songs or hymns, but some cultures will specialize in some types of music. Did I mention that music in a learning environment can be appropriate, not loud and no singing; games are an example of that; you aint got singers in games, but the music is good to games, most of the time. I'm talking learning environment here, you can still cultivate singers.

Next, we'll need to systemize things in fairness to protect cultural societies on limited territories; a limit to their population will go toward that end, it is necessary. I believe the weight of around 15 millions (12-18, so I'll say 18 max) individuals having the same kind of culture will permit the reaching of the ideal profundity capacity in imagination and creativity work for that difference, that's just a non-scientific number that I think makes sense, this limit will permits inexistent differences to express cultural traits with adequate and fair weight for continual historical development. That's a reason of the why of the "bubble" system I'll talk about to protect valuable cultural "roots" within the sight of the reality as a whole which distribute (make available) everything limited in fairness including lands, structures, mining and population limits, don't forget that things are decided from the concerned people and their associated expertise group.

I hope you understand what I think about maximal racial population number that's supposed to pop up advantages; it is the contrary, you'll gain disadvantages because you'll limit others. So don't think you'll suddenly grow a superiority mutation from the attitude, that's not how it works, if life was meant to work only on one ecosystem, there would be 1/10 000 number of life-forms. What's more, if the species can't control its ego, it will act superior with others and no association will last in that environment, and that's without talking about high probability of inadequacy to survive from its ways. As for evolution, it's the process of following an ideal to me, so that's a specific thing and there is no such thing as general evolution, unless you have general goals. The same for birthing an unfair number of a single type, like it will suddenly unlock a mutation, or that it happens after a quantity of fucking, yes, you'll have all what's appropriate to your reality, life will help you, you are its extension, it is forced to have faith in you. The problem is that it has already been done long ago for the style we currently think is the only way, so all you have is the effect of forcing things, mentally a lot (like generations after generations of deeply unhappy men working their life out to never see the light at the end of the tunnel), and that's what you reap, mainly sicknesses, and stuff you can't even notice at the Olympics.

There is all kind of things like that suggested in movies, like saying evolution happen every 200 000 years, and that diversity of mutations will be proportional to number of people, like the human is all wrong and would be far better with angelic wings or with thought reading powers; that's ridiculous. We are in part a basis available for life to express itself, we must provide it with options inside a species, and this will work better if we can associate well without war in an environment where people can feel they always have a home, even a city, even a place where their favorite attitude and style is the prominent one. We are not maladapted here, we are perfect here, we expand our potential, and we let life reclaim some place.

As for developing better natural skills, my vision is that you need to protect and grow racial differences for many thousands of years, not mix everybody as a soup, and what you'll gain from that is not a human that flies, you'll get people with a skill more developed, and probably at a little price somewhere else. In a well associated advanced reality with high level technologies, these differences will definitively be a plus, it will permit us to do very hard things far more easily while opening possibilities to life; it's the Indians that were super good at working high rises?

Next in line are those who will try to demolish my view by saying that this is against the theory of evolution that say something like only the strongest competitor shall survive, like capitalism is the way of life. That is manipulation scrap, but I already explained that, or the use of high consciousness, anyway, the have the right to use his head to the maximal extent of it to survive and that's what I'm doing, life gave me a mind and I surely won't ignore it to satisfy your bullshit, so in fact, I could say I'm working hand in hand with the theory of evolution since using my head I came to the conclusion that the present way of doing things is the fastest way to the hole, while my way is meant to survive the longest, ok?

Another way to see it is that "natural selection" or "pressure selection" is based on applied principles one way or the other, what permitted animals or humans to thrive or not are principles and that's what I'm doing; I'm checking around if principles are allright, things can degenerate from bad or twisted principles...

And did I mention it is rarely the best that survive in this reality? It is not the strongest that is meant to survive in the end, but the best, read "Lift-Off" if you want to know my theory about that, basically, the best is made of many independent parts, the worst too... So I can bust my head to invent stuff all I want, to the point of designing a paradise (not that I'm good at that, you know it's a vision right? By thinking "paradise" I just set my ideal, something that remains very relative, particularly to time.), if I'm in a reality of people who don't care or only think of profiting while competing anything else to elimination, finding all kind of stupid senseless arguments to invalidate it, then it won't exist and that's all.

That's the ideal we'll follow with our new reality, have as many different stable human cultures, protected in somewhat the same quantity, as the planet can take. You understand that the protection principle is not meant to condemn people as the same, if you followed attentively you should have hints that there's another step to this, everything is meant to continue the process as a wheel that never ends...

One reason for the life reality is to stop people taking more than their just share. So no culture will ever go over 18 million in population (don't forget it is an "around" 15 million number I could have set the limit at 12 millions), yet, that limit may get modified as time advances. For a lot of time, it will be an advantage to have 18 million, but in a thousand year we may lower that number depending on how things develop. I don't know how long the expansion phase will take, maybe 1000 years, maybe more, we may cumulate 100-200 different societies within that time, ranging in population from 1 million to 18 million, and yes it will be a fantastic feat to succeed at systemizing them all, but it can be done with good will, maybe more easily than I think, it's just sooo big...

Now, that will slowly bring us to be about half the present population, which, considering the basis of comfort people will have, will force us to have some aspects of reality going more slowly, mainly negative for life aspects, which is not a bad thing; the goal is efficiency toward noble goals, and if the planet, and life and humanity can take it more easily, then all the better. But that's just a gross estimation from my part; I'm guessing that the planet can take half of today's population in comfort, but we'll have to calculate things better since the basis is one costly and polluting thing, maybe 1/3 is more appropriate, but in such a scenario, societies will have to be limited to around 12 million in population (max 15).

Still, considering our way of living and our attitude with life, we may be surprised to realize we can easily reach today's population level without a problem. We'll see all that in the future, but there is no limit to population if the planet or life has no problem with it, and we'll grow it as much as we can as long as there is no problem with resources, but we'll be masters of renewable resources and recycling; don't think we'll let a ship rust or that we'll make plane graveyards.

Following that line, we may decide, if we become somewhat stable in racial-cultural grouping number, to increase the limit to 20 million. Still, birth rate must always be kept under control, we're not animals, and we must keep in mind that 18 million is overkill for a single society, we'll go over that only because we want as many humans as possible without affecting the planet, life, or wild life, but the priority is always racial-cultural differences; we'll prefer to have more of them than increasing the population limit for a single one beyond 18 million.

I believe there will always be new differences that will arise, and that's why we must see them as bubbles within a reality, that's a reason of the why of the flower city principle with its vast lodging complex to limit urban senseless spreading, the flower city represents all what we stand for, and it practically eliminates will spread on a vast territory and it will greatly limit resources needs as well as pollution.

The territory outside the bubble system is "international", that way the space can be optimized for the best arrangement of bubbles. I can't predict how quickly things will develop, maybe 200 entities in the first 1000 years, raise that to 300 in 2000 years as new ones start appearing, maybe 500 differences in the far away future, that's why you'll totally get rid of territory spreading ideas as you become part of the new reality, and to sustain 500 societies of around 15 million individuals, you better know the earth perfectly, but at that point, you can bet there will be mining colonies all around, and the human imprint on earth will look like the most unbelievable garden...

Once a society reaches 18 million they can't expand anymore anywhere in the reality unless they create a new cultural entity by learning a new language as a basis and cumulating a minimal physical or genetic difference. They'll cumulate a list of their kind over time, ready to be given development projects, thus forming a somewhat closed community of a majority of themselves as a village. I'll call that the forming of a bubble of that cultural taking a place on the territory of the reality. Bubbles can expand or give birth to new bubbles, unless they get to 18 million.

So, if English whites want to be more than that, they can have a different language for one, a strong different entertainment way for 2, a physical trait they want to protect and develop for 3, and a super top specialization of science for the troubles. Something like that. Finally, some options will be exposed by the judgment emphasis of people.

The number of cultures may reach stability at around 500 after 10 000 years, but the goal is to preserve and mix them, and a single one don't need more than 250 000 individuals to be qualified as protected, so nobody pass this point need to make a paranoia about growing their numbers. The reality judgment structure will dictate priorities, and protection of cultural integrity is the absolute. So, after the reality is starting to be successful with many different bubbles well started, all local Indian tribes with a different language will be given higher priority in development, like making a protected Inuit bubble north of Québec.7/8

Every cultural society must have the existing potential, or a project, to form a "bubble" (village, town, or city solely containing the people and their industries). But, a single bubble won't be enough for most, we will encourage the development of bubbles to have expansion potential within acceptable reach of a first bubble, and a bubble includes any place where your culture exists as protected. I'd say that the entity should not have bubbles farther 500 km apart. It means that within this radius there should exist a bubble project which will get underway as soon as the culture becomes part of the life reality. The goal is to form closely attached sets or chains of bubbles, 2 should be the minimum (Quebec).

To form the equivalent of a flower city, at least 2 connections to existing strong cultural or historical entities should exist containing bubbles of the ratio 63-72, 9, 18 (I'm just fooling around numerology here...). This is the minimal cultural protection formulae. It means the culture composes 63% of the population of its bubble, minimally, and it can go as high as 72%, but they can decide that the 9% (72-63=9) is a specifically chosen other kind of culture. Another 9% is under reality's control, it can be carefully used for any reasons, as buffer, as an encouragement for a specific to exist, but mainly as expertise presence as many bubbles will need reality's help to develop well some expertise facets, and that can simply be to take care of structures while the culture becomes capable of doing it itself. The remaining 18% is everybody's thing, it is free for all, but not fuck all...

Cultural societies can slowly cumulate names to be given development lands if the reality (people) got projects for the land and they are within the wanted radius necessary. If a difference arises, it can be cumulated and eventually form a new culture, taking care of a few industries that work together forming a new "bubble". The "bubble" is where people sleep and live together most of the time, including the structures they care for. They develop these places in their language and ways and keep them for as long as they can, and new projects, or close related ones, are judged by the reality for addition or replacement if they concern everybody, and such projects come from anywhere.

Already existing cultural societies will be strongly encouraged to protect their historic ways for a start, maybe a few museums, but such things are meant to stay a concentration of a cultural time slab on the general area where it existed, if not, all the planet will never end bitching. Furthermore, they must not forget that their father reality spot where they come from will fall under life reality's jurisdiction, and it means, if they want to keep a normal city from their original place, that they will have to accept new limitation. Evidently they are, like everybody else, under A&D groups decisions.

Another example of a bubble can be a minority falling in our reality's territory, which will prefer a very different way of things, they may be Amerindians, who live close together forming a culture that can specialize in wild life appreciation, but they must still have the ratio (63-72, 9, 18). They will have an equivalent basis but they must have a use to the reality while not spreading beyond their fair bubbles, evidently they can and must be helped by scientists and development teams; they are inside the reality. Some cultures take more time to form some form of civilization, there are some that have been rejecting this reality from the beginning judging it inadequate, some will adapt well to our ways, others, like Inuit as an example, will have more difficulties because of their historical and environmental situation.

We will help them keep their cultural society bubble, and we'll give them the same basis. They must stay under the ways of the reality and that's it, or they could become 2 faraway developing systems of different environments visiting and helping each other. They may take longer to develop a cultural city, but the basis will provide them with a strong example of the way to go to develop their things better. However, one of the reality's ways is that we don't let people conquer or take territory, so like everybody else they'll live in an appropriate bubble where everything they need to live comfortably is provided (it's not an actual bubble you can pop with a stick, or a prison, where do you live? In a place, but for us our liberty of movement is the whole reality without hassles). A culture protects itself this way, no need to have a city part, but if they wish, then they can develop as a buffer city bubble and gain sufficient listed numbers to contribute to the forming of a "flower" type city (highly centralized).

There is always a basic reproduction rate for everybody to sustain itself, but we have to limit planetary population, accept it or forget it; you can't have all liberties and you know it, you can't spread on lands unfairly, and you can't make a competition of birthing either; these are tool to take over the world, or you don't care about fairness and others.

If the reality needs to, or can, increase its population, it will prefer to issue permits to those societies on a list of availability for expansion, to expand or create new bubbles, but the choice must be made in function of what the expansion will bring to the reality, the other emphasis is concentration, meaning we'll want them to develop a medium to big city that have a maximum of uses, the "cultural city" I mentioned, where a people can explore its differences while being useful, and I lack imagination for names, and I can't name it a "normal city" because even if it is not much different, I want to express a step process concerning how the reality will develop.

Also, you don't drop too many people in one place in one shot, you always try to grow things, that way if a problem arises you can react more appropriately; that's why most brand new cultural societies will unpack as villages, and, as they prove they're taking things well in their hands, the reality, through an A&D group, will open the valves on more things, until they become a full blown cultural city. For already existing places we'll accept, they will mostly be transferred as is, particularly if they got a strong history and are not too vast, people already living there will take care of matters without having to start from almost nothing.

Bubbles are an attachment to the reality, reality which distributes grants of people, or credits, or structures, or jobs to its attachments that run themselves with their local A&D groups. The more exemplary toward reality's ideals, or new ideals, the more the reality will want to invest, whatever the form, in the culture; help bring it nearer its maximum population limit, and I said help, meaning that there is no enforcement unless you go over 18 millions. These specificities of cultural societies are many, they permit better expertise and specialization, all the while not forgetting complementarity, some cultures will always have a preference for another one that complement or add to it well, that's one of the why of the 63-72, 9, 18 in population diversity in external to flower cities bubbles, if you can't work "around" (+-5%) those numbers, as they permit 36% of mixing, it means you must be resized smaller or even be replaced. If you can't live as a "village" within those numbers anymore, you must be spread anywhere or everywhere in the reality, we don't want tribes or sects.

The nearer a bubble is to attaining "cultural" (normal, not vast) city status, the less it's in a hurry to grow, it can last a long time building itself a history of the place while the reality emphasizes other things like updating industries, or a whole set of them for the production of something that will pollute a lot less or cost less resources, which in turn may permit a higher basic birth rate, or a boom of population for some cultures or specific bubbles, or the forming of a new bubble for others; if there are enough project available in a given area, preferably close to each other, to form a new community like a village for a very long time.

A bubble is not made of walls or fences, it is open, and if you build over your bubble territory you don't fall of the map and die, it is your cultural society that will deal with the territory limits accepted by the reality. Sense here means that a little spilling or mistakes won't be seen as a criminal thing by the reality, but it will depend on many factors, only the reality can accept territory growth, if unwanted growth (territory) is noticed, the territory will be made a little smaller instead, but the reality will be better if it deals things in sense and efficiently. So cultural entities are better express their will for territory adjustments, that's all what is needed, you don't pay for your bubble expansion, but we don't want people who like to hunt animals to end-up in your backyard instead of the forest, just don't forget you should be careful when you hit around 15 million individuals... And that attitude applies to birthrate, it is cultural societies that will have the responsibility to never go over 18 million, even if a few people over can be tolerated, but at some point more direct measures will be used, and in the face of hysteria we will have to bow to the fairest option, which may as well be to decide deportation from random pickings, or random castration? That sounds very much like a terrible idea to calm hysteria, but well, we humans have the pretention to do it with animals that can't control their reproduction you know...

Strange, but I think good intentions can go a long way here. I could say you can force the gremlin that has the "who cares" attitude with human responsibility (choosing to be treated like an animal), but we won't be in current reality, won't we? People will like to care in our reality because the deception level to reach "who cares" will never be reached, evil don't care, entropy don't care, and in hell you don't care because it is no fun to feel bad, or it's no fun to care, it's more like a chore, ask nurses (for my aunt being a competent nurse have been deathly hard, physically and psychologically). But what if you have no reason to feel bad? And what if caring is not a chore? If caring is cared about and people rewarded as they should, then you care by default because it is not too hard, or more rewarding, or you don't feel cheated for your great heart beside a psychopath... And caring makes you understand better. I should add that you have the minimal right to make evil feel bad (it's not god's philosophy, it's mine...), it's like the minimum sentence, he won't take it but too bad, if you do nothing it is you that will end-up feeling bad with bigger problems. So for those who absolutely must procreate to feel alive, then it will be marked as a negative factor in their file, if too many people don't care, then I see nothing wrong if media people make them feel bad for their unfair attitude. But yeah, smart asses like me can still push the fuck the law button, and make themselves available for castration, if I wanted to end things badly... There are accidents, evidently, exceptions, context, luck, all kind of factors and situations can make birthing more than necessary acceptable, but I'm not strong on the "I'm an innocent!" argument; we don't grow ignorant people here. Again I'm talking about a problematic that will happen someday in the future, and I compare things to a reality that is born to always have problems with population, if not too much it will be too little, and control for accelerated effects means people going nuts one way or the other. I'm sure it will be different for us by the way things works, it is my belief that as long as we develop a view that will make it fair for everybody, decided by everybody, then people will be happy about it.

That brings me to the age philosophy I developed for maturity and reproduction, I don't have to go through this again so let's say we'll want an emphasis for more mature people to reproduce, maybe shown as something that cumulates with time to reach an optimal point of release, and just that should be enough to dissuade too many young bucks making babies, instead of castrating them all over the place.

Don't forget that the forming of a bubble is dependent on being in harmony with reality's goals; people don't do anything they want, and the reality can't cheat its cultures since everything is exposed. Most structures built by the reality are for the development of these (people do their things through cultural societies), and everybody will see their version of the bottle doing its things live, with different layers moving and interacting, they will see the different societies with their flags on the map, zooming a place will show all related things and files to buildings or structure, you'll click on one to have all details about it, click on financial report to see it, click on residents to find someone (unless locked), all structures will be somewhat digitalized. We'll have detailed charts of everything a society does, and the information will be public, available to everybody, so if someone got a project...

Once a cultural society forms a bubble at a place, it may stay that way for many thousands of years, developing its difference, until a grave problem arises, or self-reproduction in the ratio of mixity the reality needs becomes impossible. In such a scenario the bubble must be deflated and its people moved where they want and can respectfully; we'll care for the people, that's the why of this reality; we won't leave anybody without the means to install themselves comfortably elsewhere if it comes to that.

And it's not only a question of reality's expenses of caring for roads and stuff, it's a question of evolution, the ideal is to have a cultural city (that can be a town) for all cultural societies, which can give it the basis it wants, learning, sports, entertainment, television, communication, industries, research structures, strengthening itself through all kind of diverse things while being protected from other cultural pressure and protecting their language.

Cultural cities can have living space to stash and use people that can eventually be used to form other bubbles. Once a culture got that, they can more easily cumulate names and even ask to make a "baby boom" (sounds like pedophilia, but it's really about the babies...) if they want to become a part of a "flower" city or new bubble which will get built as the youth grows. To form a flower style city, a minimum of 4 societies are needed, and they must provide a sustained flow of people, while not forgetting that it is a bubble system part, meaning that the people forming a flower city are accounted in the total population of that society.

Now, things can be made better or different than what I described, but you understand the principles, here, external to flower cities bubbles protect and let develop differences, while flower cities are the ground on which these differences are mixed and hybridized under some control. Cultural cities may be made of already existing villages, town and cities, particularly if they have strong historical roots. The ultimate goal is for every culture to have a cultural city development equivalent (that may be a bunch of close small towns) where they are protected as "pure". The ratio of 63% min 72% max culture 9% reality 18% free may be modified if necessary for a higher one like 72-81, 9, 9 for cultural cities, and the 9% (72-81) may form a neighborhood inside a bubble if they want, nothing wrong with that and that applies to flower cities too.

You'll have cultural bubbles to protect your culture, flower cities have a different goal, they are meant for efficiency and cultures hybridization. Yet, nobody have to make one, like nobody is forced to make underground areas, but people must be provided the basis at the minimum standard required by the reality, reality that preferably start with a flower city, and the efficiency (power, water, pollution, creativity, research, usefulness, etc generally speaking) of any city over 4 million individuals must compare to that first city, let's say +- 25%.

A flower city is a place for more hybridizing, they are optimized cities for mass efficiency, not necessarily of flowery design, but particularly beautiful (you got to help centralization a little...), of a not much bigger footprint than a cultural city. No hurry to take part of one, yet, if 250 000 people form a cultural city equivalent, they can ask for a baby boom for the eventuality of filling a part of a flower city, which will start construction when, say, 6 (for a 6 parts flower city) societies have gained mass, or are on a momentum to it, a few in close proximity. Don't forget the reality encourages strong socialization in youth, so you can make 5 babies and the reality systematization will still permit you to breathe some. The flower city doesn't need to be complete but the basic infrastructure must be built with necessary logistics available, the first flower city will experiment these things a lot, building a blueprint of how to do better, in fact it's not a bad view, you can't see such a project as a new reality as a Napoleon with a dream, we have pointed expertise, science, communication, data gathering, and it will all be there, because that's where humanity is, and it will want to take the means to show what it is capable of. Just so we understand each other well, as is the case with the new reality systems, we won't place a brick without a simulation and full design specifications. Those continue their boom while helping (within their capacities, can be simple designing) to finish their part of the flower city with the help of others.

Evidently this seems impossible considering people are independent, but that's underestimating the will of people to group together (it's a pride thing), according to proximity of cultural history (cultural cities), and 250 000 people is the minimum culture population to ask for a boom (reality bonus to reproduction, availability of which is dependent on reality population, and you can't distribute too many since some will try to cheat, but on a reality of 200 cultural societies you could have around 10 under a booming scenario (priorities geared toward reproduction), and don't forget that it is not necessarily the youth that will move to a flower city, and since the culture won't be capable of developing the structuring to support such a boom, people will move out more easily.

Finally, it is the reality that build the basis (not what is not part of the basis) of a flower city with help to the mutually accepted standard, and a culture that asks to be part of a flower city must have projects for its part, it must really want it, people must be involved, they must want to make it their thing, they must be proud of it, while not forgetting one of the main reasons for flower cities to exist; association, working with other cultures, hybridizing, it's like big love!

The ratio of cultural society diversity for flower cities is lower for more mixing, 45-54, 18, 27, meaning that if the flower city is made for 6 cultures of 1 million each, 54% proportional to actual population don't need to be of that culture, you can even change that ratio a little, but not much since it will always stay an approximate "around" thing. We can even make the ratio "flower city dependent", while keeping in mind that each part is a part of a cultural society connection to external bubbles, meaning the ratio must guarantee a minimal strength of protection of that difference through reproduction.

A flower city doesn't need to be made for more than 250 000 individuals by society, but it must still accommodate a minimum of 1 million people. And next, that's supposing we do things from our reality's people only, we may have vast lists of people from father reality cultural entities all waiting for an opportunity, some may be ready to learn a new language and adapt to cultural ways to be a part of it.

And you don't form these type of cities to mix a sauce, if that would be the case, we wouldn't impose a ratio. You go there to live, to do your things normally, the process of hybridization is a slow one based on proximity, it mainly exists for languages and cultures, you're just a few streets away from a different world is the principle, what does that strange sign means? And yes you may fall in love with anybody on earth, but the idea is to affect an international language, take ideas around, form new cultural roots. Now, I'll repeat that I'm not always right, or things may be done differently. Here, it is absolutely possible that my vision of a different "international" language could be associated to the 6 different initiators of life reality which could spring on earth (very far away from each other). And communication between all of them could be made through a more systemized cold translating engine.

You understand that we could ruin the planet and the reality exploring all combinations of differences possible, you know what our ultimate priority goals are, worse, we may need a whole galaxy exploring differences, very different than assimilating everything to a single "superior" language and a single "neutral" race...

There are always limitations and someday we will hit cultural diversity groupings limits on earth and all those cultures will continue to develop groups of diversity specialization within themselves, like a vast city full of all levels of differences and mixes of skills with variations.

The goal is to have a fundamental basis of reality, like the democracy-capitalism business of ego reality, and a systematization of differences, like country competition war and fear permitted a existence of for some time, even if it mostly lost that sole good facet by its own self-preservation-destruction principles. And that applies to the fight for intelligence, it is absolutely my experience that assholes (poor to powerful) have been having the advantage over me all along my life, and developing myself to go over it I'm still stuck with the same problem, no effect. I mean intelligence and behaving well is a fucking chore because I'm submerged in evil. And that's one traumatic experience this whole reality is going through, because one part of the evils of the ego-god ideology is that his selection of self-accepted misinformed ignorant slaves continually put tremendous pressure on intelligence and life, and at some point you can't fight anymore, and what happens then? That is another aspect of the incoming catastrophic failure of putting yourself in a god position that shouldn't exist, it's all written in the bible, ask the pope! And the proofs are there, my life is a parody of proofs! As an example among the panoply, 3 tomes in a row I've been brought to justice by my attackers lately, 3 attacks on me where I end up accused of attacking the other, I mean, how do you succeed at doing that? Morons at it! 3 that's a proof of concept, I can make the affirmation that's how it works generally, and I don't have television to entice me to think the contrary! Your proofs are made, and you can arrange things all you want it's too late, I wrote the lines. I've been living years without a stable place surrounded by the worst hell have to offer on the poor side of things, I get punched, the guy hurt his hand, he call the police because of the blood, I'm all excited, he looks like a psychopath, and there you go, and that's just a fraction of the hell I'm living! And the lodging system is an horror, and the proofs are made, over and out, repeated like a song under all the forms I've had it!!

Flower cities will develop solely from present people at first, but at the other end of the spectrum you could have societies themselves developing new cultural ready mass variations through their learning institutions or more selective reproduction as long as the goal is good and may be useful (genetic direct intervention for advanced life is for critical failure of survival, or the future when we'll know a lot more about life, matter, planet and galactic interactions, and while love as a process of selection is a given, many sickness are the result of transitory evolutionary states, in the way I see life).

Some will say it's not supposed to work like that, like people are supposed to grow by themselves on the moon, because we don't spread their way. We build those flower cities almost basis ready before moving people in, but that's how it work, you need the hut to build the house, and the house to build a castle, we'll have to put a tremendous quantity of credits and energy building the basis of these cities that are marvels in themselves, jewels, quick enough, slowing a lot of stuff, but their eventual success is a tremendous new quantity of credits for the reality, new means, possibilities, it's like investing credits for more, and you never have enough of that, even when the reality reaches a "golden age" at which point it may not need that much and start spending it on all kind of more counterproductive stuff.

Small "golden ages" happen through the history of a society, morphing it for the better, but the biggest of these happens when it reaches ultimate goals, like successfully colonizing another planet, then it can relax, still work toward its ideals since the structures exist, but at a more relaxing pace while boasting around some, in fact that's how you should look at golden ages, as moments where you grow your ego globally a lot more, as reward for your successes.

The problem is at the start, a single flower city cannot have the input of credits and workforce to build new cities as it wants. Particularly as a partly experimental city on all kind of aspects that other cultural societies will learn from to design their view of one. That's why the initial city must be such a marvel, and that's the why we need all the help from father reality for the growth of our reality until success tangent is reached; you don't give birth to abandon the baby to himself, and when the baby is grown enough he gives birth to other babies, I think that's how babies work. If it does this thing right, we'll be proud of father, and we'll even replace old hate by appreciation for making all the mistakes in our place, showing us what to and what not to do, we must not forget he had to teach some manners to one savage mother earth too, maybe everything was meant to be that way. But for now, he's got to wake up about himself and take his responsibilities, so I'm sorry if I have to shout he's destroying everything and killing mother earth, I'm justified to demonize him, and I'm scared that's what's he's doing, I may be panicking but at least I'm interposing myself, and that's big when he's a billion time bigger...

Actual cities towns and villages will be adapted to our decision and development structure. People who are inadequate will have to be displaced before we accept the piece of territory. We'll prioritize places that bring much more than self-sufficiency too. We'll pick from availability lists of already pre filtered categories, sometime at the lot if available. If we don't get enough adequate people then too bad, we can work around some numbers but at some point you don't fight against the will of people if you don't want shit to backfire, you can only try to get to see your viewpoint, fight some, and beyond that you just let go if nobody cares, evidently that would work very much ideally in hell, where just telling your viewpoint is a tremendous challenge...

Any piece of land or people entering our reality will be severely shaken, change is change, so don't think the new reality will just enclose your place and nothing will change, but under a bulk scenario, you will be given options. So we won't accept to be thrown bubble of people of all kind, they must know what's going on and be ready to deal with it. We won't take terminally sick people either; we will make our selection, and gravely sick people and old won't be our priority; the healthier the better. You will pass a blood test for known sicknesses before being accepted, and every few years thereafter. We will accept slight handicaps and sickness that heal or that don't degenerate to accelerated death, so we'll be hard on some sickness but we will still accept most, just don't forget a lot is dependent on which positive facets we'll want as a priority; if we need engineers at the beginning we surely won't choose the contrary. I believe some (not all, leave some to chemical demolition) genetic "problems" are reality, or attitude, related, other are new implementations not working right yet, they may take thousands of years to heal or develop though.

So we won't systematically select all sicknesses out, and like you can't have uncontrolled birth rate in a limited space, or in an interstellar vessel, the same for rampaging degenerative sickness, and if you can't accept that, then humanity is worthless in the end. The earth is a vessel traveling a path, get used to such limitations, humanity didn't shit in a toilet when it started, yet, today you'd find it ridiculous seeing people shitting in the middle of the place. You got used to the limitation to your liberties until it became an unconscious logical thing, we have to do the same with birth rate, resources, life and some sicknesses, and that doesn't mean we should not work very hard finding cures; that means limiting its spreading, whatever the ways it is done, whatever a mentality is associated to it; you can develop the toilet mentality? You can understand the need for not strolling around nude? Then you can develop the true love mentality too; get to work.

Dangerous infectious, blood diseases that don't heal and that are easily transmissible whatever the form, like HIV or hepatitis C, will not be accepted (my environment is very prone to these kind of sicknesses, so I wouldn't be surprised if I was infected even if I'm practically a virgin, and too bad for me I guess...). And I'll add on HIV particularly that we don't want people to have it in our reality, if one of our citizens catches it, he will have the choice to be quarantined in irons until a cure is found, or he will be burned, alive, but I'm just joking a little, we'll just tattoo it on his forehead so people know, but I'm just joking a little too much, we'll just force his medical data to sight. And I'm not talking about expensive painkillers, chemicals, and longevity stuff; I'm talking about a cure. We will do heavy medical research when we become successful as a reality, even on HIV, but not at the beginning. So fuckers without consciousness that will make trips to the other reality to satisfy their urges better be prepared, we are not unconscious people who tolerate and accept anything, even an epidemic, and I'm not talking about a cold. You know what we did when we set foot on America? We exchanged blood with the Indians, it was like a mark of affection. I don't say it was a good idea and I wouldn't do it, but there are many ways fluids transmit between people, emotions too, if it can't happen without fearing for our health, then we have a very serious problem. I want to take people I appreciate in my arms if I want, I want to shake hands and do some boxing without virus paranoia.

If someone spread such maladies on purpose, they will immediately lose system protection. So don't be surprised if the store owner empties a gun at your face and start gutting you out for your organs, virus infected organs can be purified right? You wanted to infect other, kill them or handicap them hypocritically? And you know there are some who catch or spread HIV on purpose in ego reality, just by inadvertence (like me scrubbing the shit of my suspiciously thin neighbor, after having scrubbed the shit of the whole disgusting apartment that has seen a hundred crazies before getting the guy that eats his fingernails to the blood stuck with the job, just to not to add vomit to the decor). Other say it's just their fun to catch it, to risk it all, then they'll be paid fantastically expensive medication, while I can't even get a treatment for an infection.

Next, all genetic interactions will be watched for, everybody will have a genetic follow-up, and it is solely for cultural society's possible avenues and medical uses; knowing past medical problems all through the genealogical tree. It is a medical tool concerning not only developing aspects of cultures, but healing capacity and control of sicknesses too, but it's not a reproduction tool to produce weirdoes; loving couples are formed from personal judgment. It can be used in reproduction when the reality system computer detects a couple too, like a simple notice saying the system detected that you are two regularly related people, probably a couple. At that point, you can, the choice is personal to you, ask for a report on health risk factors of reproduction which you'll eventually get, and it will simply state which negative things could happen in what ratio, and it is not a final truth. Now you better not go nuts about this way of doing things, look at your reality before lamenting, you want another reality or not? If everything is wrong to you, stay in your reality where everything is right, and that applies to all what I'm writing about; this reality is not an example I'm trying to recreate better, but it doesn't mean I'm not malleable or sometimes mistaken.

Another way to know if you should stay away or if you're better made for the life reality, just think of how you see your reality; what is your mind doing while taking a walk through it? Do you only look visually at the surface of it? Or do you imagine what's behind? Do you see behind asphalt or is it just something you drive your car on, what is your car? What's behind it? Stuff you don't care to understand? Not important to you? Can you imagine the light energy and the soil and water meet as a beautiful growing plant? What do you see when you travel? Places or animals to take a selfie? Why do you do things? Because you are told so? Because it is "in"? Sure you don't have to care about everything, but what about love? Remember how I see praying? The picture is not only what you see.

The father reality must give us territory as we grow (Do you have a better idea? Ah! Extraterrestrials zapping people off with lazers!), but we won't want to take it if it is not safe. That means the territory stays under father reality's control while we decide how it will be implemented, and places we don't want will be excluded, or marked for virginity, or evacuated and implemented anew with another entity. It's supposed to be the responsibility of father reality to clear space since it took it all, and minimize risks no? Our success depends on it...

Father got 3 choices; it let us arrange the bubbles (people, villages, cities) composing our reality by ourselves before giving the terrain and we tell it how we want these bubbles, which it will arrange somewhat to our standards before switching the terrain. Or it clears all people from the lands it will give us, that way we choose from our lists of people and develop it immediately as virgin lands. Or last, it transfer the territory with the people, but that may increase frustration because we'll pass lots of time hating getting hated for moving people, be it out or within our territory, to make the place to the standards of life reality. Everybody knows a new way will need growing territory, where is it? This reality took the whole planet thinking only it had the right to exist; now it will have to clear some space. Evidently, there are better or worse ways, and I'll prefer it if we try to respect people by not causing too much of a trauma.

We'll do things in the best way we can, but it's not a newborn that must clean after father, doesn't make sense, maybe when we'll be an adult though. We can't be forced, when we say a city must be evacuated before the place is usable to us, then it has to happen. You still got to limit the extent though, we do our part from stuff we can work with, but the psychological aspect of the present selection should not be our trouble. Yet, I could always underestimate that I'm so much into something that people would be too proud to work the space they want to transfer beyond the standard we ask of them, thing would go so smoothly it would be like just plopping a puzzle piece. Or I could overestimate the crap out of everything too, that's actually kind of philosophical, I hope that's unlikely...If there is competition the best development plan of slow morphing of the place will be decided by the reality evidently. But I still think we'll be better with the means to integrate places with almost all their population, the bulk scenario, since we'll prefer in many instances to have a territory with people instead of none, like many villages, so as we grow and gain experience and expertise, we'll have to develop integration recipes and laws that will make it easier, people just continue working as usual but things change by steps, with some expertise help for adaptation, it doesn't take that much of a big team to go through a hundred thousand people and see if things are allright, just to put a human touch there, it could even become a permanent team associated to the related cultural society. Emphasis will be on historical value, cost, development uses, etc. Since population limit is 18 million, not many vast cities will be transferred that way. You can start with a working simulation, get its schema of integration to reality done, you warn people in advance. Whole slabs of people can be switched to the new ways if they are ready to accept a percentage will be inappropriate, and those may be given a few choices, more than one or two, a list is better, contracts are an option. Maybe whole cities can switch within a few years of preparation, but anywhere there is people there is don't forget that the first priority of the reality is always to provide the basis.

It will be a difficulty experimenting these things, but we'll eventually want to do at least half the work in hands with current reality because that can be a difficult job, and we have to help ourselves as much as possible too; father reality is not supposed to do everything ugly, even if it looks the contrary. It's an exchange, a commune accord of fairness law, you know if you start this thing you will have to work toward the implantation of the reality balance. For now we got to help as much as we can in anything important that concerns us.

We'll want to preserve a lot of already existing stuff, including whole villages all the way to cities, preferably, instead of being given a virgin place, even if many will be plowed for different uses. So, after some expansion, when people have relaxed their hype, while seeing the reality can work, we will start including people almost whole, with their legs, but not their arms yet. That's just a bad joke, they'll still have their arms connected. We will experiment that on a village at first, slowly upgrading its political, judgment, monetary structure and more to the standard of reality; once a few villages are successful, we can try a more difficult step, a town, then the top difficult will be cities, but once a few ones have been transformed, things should go easier, even if this is still an ideal vision of something that will be a mess of difficulties.

The trick will be to create a "recipe" of A&D that will take over places. The difficulty is mainly with people, if they didn't exist and built stuff everywhere, we'd take the land and make wonderful direct hassle free development plans, and nobody would complain, no? Yeah....but it's not an argument, I'm just trying to say people count tremendously, a good willed person is worth a big effort and investment, better to already have it than to grow it from scratch, but you wouldn't like it if I started popping adult ready good humans at the tons, you'd miss your innocence too much.

So you got to make a transition scenario for people, while time is limited, and still some will be affected enough to jump down a cliff, attached to lands, attached to objects, too much self-investment for a place they like. But it's sometimes a pain on the reality of things, things are built, things disaggregate, mistakes are made, goals change, it happens often, people sometimes abandon whole parts of towns, and the homes where the family grew get demolished, people do it for a good compensation normally, they sell the house and try other projects, and sometimes it is a cataclysm that remove parts of places people are attached to, or war.

Make lucky people as much as you can and try to minimize scenarios where people are unlucky, but people got to adapt to an order of things that surpass their own person to bring fairness, wellbeing, association and more to everybody including life and the earth, and you do it at an unbelievably displaced and twisted extent presently, you systemized the earth within its ways, its order, that order is made of principles, limitations and laws, not necessarily human, and a new reality is full of new ones replacing old ones, so more people will have to live and accept some changes. But I'm just turning around the pot. We'll do our best to help within our limited means, but we're not making a stash of people that do nothing and are taken care of, you're part of the reality or not, you understand that the reality will be a success by the work of people, surely not spending of money taken on the moon, or a god dropping it on you, and our priorities will be very different, sorry. It doesn't mean working like crazy either, it just mean a good human understand these things, they want to contribute, try to make the world better and easier, to attain ideals, explore ideas, give forever more value to his life and life altogether. Now, the basis principle of the reality will include a lot of work most people can do, the emphasis will be to put that work at its right places, so the priority for these jobs will always be for basis work time, mostly younger people who are experiencing living, a few days of brain hassle free work a week is perfect, and what's better is that it can be cumulated as a an investment or a debt, a start at taking more responsibilities.

At some point in the future, there will be a lot less work to do too, and to skip grave profiting unfairness, like most artists ending up being treated like they're the most valuable people of the civilization, you may be better expand your view of what is humanly more or less valuable, that's in part why I talked about indispensability to life as an ultimate view of one's worth. But you're better seeing it as filling the view of the reality or cultural society ideal for now, the better you are at fulfilling many facets of it, the bigger the access to credits, and I said many, not a single skill, like smiling & babbling. It would be like there is a thousand facets of living having a different worth in credits (ladder of pay), but none will make you rich alone. Love could be made very valuable this way, and maybe that view should be seriously prepared right from the start. Can someone tell me what's wrong with this?

So, at some point in reaching success, or by using democracy, lands with people can be transferred by will; a census can be made of the population, some will be rejected, some will have to sell their place, but we'll "bubble" any place that can fit our criteria while not trespassing culture population limits. The environment will be of great concern since we want to have as many people in comfort as the environment can take. And since we want to preserve places full of history, the places we won't accept are environmentally problematic vast city expanses; those are shrunk in our reality to limit their environmental impact while increasing services.

Flower cities in our reality replace vast city expanses, they can take many forms, but are no more than 25 km2, and they service many millions of people comfortably in a beautiful and sane environment. You will simply not want to compare the global negative impact of an actual city of 10 million in all its facets, including the reality's ways, versus the impact of a flower city, the difference is simply too big, probably 60%; it would take a 6 flower cities to have the negative impact of a single city of this reality. If people like it, we may eventually come to surpass the number of people actually living on earth for far more efficiency, simply by using our brains to make thing well.

Flower cities are not necessarily extraordinary thing for everybody, they are marvels as condensed cities and the people living in them are there because they need or want to be there, they may contain many temporary students, older people, people who like it, all the people working on the city functioning, hospitals, police, restaurants, bars, commerce, services, structures of reality too, then there are production and recycling intra city structures, tons of research and entertainment production to perform. They are there for people who want to live in such an environment, they are not a prison, if one is a success and there is demand for another one, then a project is chosen and it get built, if peoples don't like it, then they will have to be made better.

Since there will be less population, and the emphasis will be to move people from old city expanses to flower cities, that should give a truly big and good environmental impact. For useless city expanse transferred, old buildings will be recycled, as well as some asphalt and concrete, the gained space will be used more in an environmental development way, and there will be abandoned cities too. That applies to those big city centers of this reality, we don't have to waste these marvelous buildings and places, if they can be transformed to a flower city project, but then the expanse around will go back to nature, evidently that is a rare and extreme occurrence, particularly since we won't want cities battered by nature or with an underwater future.

Now, we will start the reality with such a city, but there is enough potential in present reality, if it stays stable, to start with many such cities, maybe 3 could be started right away at different places in the world. It's to say you are not limited to 1 right away. It's just that I developed a kind of grim opinion of the future, so even one flower city to start the life reality may be a hard goal, so don't do the globally illuminated.

Our territory expands by slabs given before we pass a certain point in population, which, for a start and safety will be half of today's population; that will make our territory bigger for less people in it than present reality, and that will permit the earth to take back its breath. Eventually the new reality may come to cover a vast majority of the planet over a long time but there will probably always be islands that are trying to do things independently in their decision way, that can be acceptable but they must not be a problem in any way (like PMBBD) to the life reality and it is better if they contribute their share toward its goals, and they'll still have to do with their fair share of resources. We must not panic if we stay stable in territory for many years also, if the situation is not enforced, as long as we're around self-sufficiency and nothing catastrophic is going on we can iron out our bugs (that doesn't work, ironing out bugs) and perfect things, morph to get more interesting, or to go over a problem. Another problem father reality will have to deal with is the concentration of people our expansion will create; the more we expand, the less space it will have for its population.

Father reality will dwindle in size, and change, we'll have to consider making it a home, it is the biggest cultural root we can find around after all, and that's kind of big root there, and there will always be people who can function together but who don't want to be of the life reality, we still must be fair to them.

In the situation of industrial and research structures passing, or if they are on our expanding terrain, we must keep the expertise when possible, we don't disable things we may need, but they will have to be prepared in advance for smooth transfer.

We will only use the best ways of doing things, and we will base a lot of our power infrastructure on small devices, mainly portative wind and water devices with a few rare gigantic structures like hydro barrages or wind plains or clean power plants. Nuclear plants will be highly limited, these things are among the most destructive for people who think beyond their own lifetime, you can do 10 gigantic hydro barrages, use them for 2 hundred years, and you're guaranteed that the place will be clean after 100 years, humans can tough 100 years in a highly limited cataclysmic situation, if it can walk somewhat freely. Even most satellites garbage will have time to disintegrate in the atmosphere within that time, but irradiating the lands with burned radioactive fuels structures, garbage and exploitation of resources for them is a condemnation for 10 000 years, even more, each reactor complex is like a piece of a hundred square kilometers slab of land you wipe off the planet, when everything is taken into consideration, including uranium exploitation and stuff like that, and stashing of wastes, and those reactors don't even last 50 years for such a tremendous negative impact, and once they're shut down, they actually cost power and money to keep them safe. And I'm there, busting my brain writing this book to tell you a new reality that will live without such craziness need such lands for life to thrive...

And don't think there is only radiation that is a long term problem, as an example, Canada have a gold mine near Yellowknife, which is not much better than Chernobyl, Chernobyl radiation will eventually decompose, but this mine is stuffed with megatons of arsenic they used to get the gold, and just a little of this and people die straight, it can't sip in water, so they filled the mine with water and iced it at -200, with something that produce tons of CO2, and it will have to stay iced like that for eternity, yes, eternity, nothing less, and it cost 3 million$ a year. So in the end, do you think the gold they exploited there versus the cost in pollution was worth it? Not at all, someday the costs will overwhelm the temporary profits a thousand times to 1 and forever growing, and for what? To enrich some people for their lifetime, but they'll say they did it for the economy. I could talk about how we deal with petroleum too...

And you think I should respect such people? They build nuclear power plants everywhere, light the whole place like a Christmas tree, make a competition out of it, push people to use it because it is available, then they tell media people and governments that people are out of control eating it, while it is them that push for needs we don't have. Like car pub. If there's an alternative which will give them as much profits, all-right, but it's not really good will, at best they will stabilize needs for a few years, not lessen them, and those needs will eventually go back on the rise from the philosophy of the reality, even if they are transformed in something else, in which case you create another rich gang, eventually, as you continue pushing every limits of life for a chain reaction of them all.

And to add insult to injury, many countries produce vast surplus of power that the country competition mentality squarely dump while moralizing people that they consume too much to increase the price, and if you make it available, rich politicians will see it as an opportunity for more growth! I'm not talking publicized facts, I'm talking about a few aspects in the panoply of tricks and manipulations those industries mix themselves to monopolize power. Then hear them all talking green about the future they're building for their children! And me in all this? Do I consume too much? Do I have to sweat in the summer and freeze in the winter? My needs stayed stable all my life, if I judge I'm not exaggerating, then who is exaggerating? Nobody? I can defend myself if you point a finger at me you know, do you? I recycle, my apartment is small, I'm not fat, I don't waste food, I don't make more people, I'm not traveling in planes, I don't even have a car. I don't say I don't want some of these things, but let's say poverty can work well with some mentalities, like when you think of the future of humanity. I put limits to my liberties myself evidently, and poverty is a kind of half choice, I somewhat knew in what I embarked myself, definitively not to the extent I'm facing today; even if I somewhat knew what I was dong, I still had no idea...(that's kind of a trick in fact, young people who don't have consciousness of what they're doing or the value of it are very precious for people who wouldn't dare invest their time or risk their minds for it (thieves, exploiters, profiteers). The whole society is adjusted with this in mind, confounded with expertise (they will use the expertise argument to defend the other type of mentality (people may have a growing worth related to gaining expertise, but expertise is only a small aspect of one's life and the process is not supposed to be used as an opportunity to cheat people of their true value)), the machination adjusts its exploitation in function of consciousness through its reward system, that's what I call profiting from innocence (mass pedophilia). So I can defend myself, whatever I did things out of revolt or by inadvertence, even if I'm a wrong example...

There are all kind of ways to make electricity, or to consume less, small wind devices or solar panels are uglier than telephone poles or hanging clothes? Can't make the circuit for trading power between people? We'll do it, we will make long lasting effective accumulators serving buildings or areas if we have to, and everybody will be capable of plugging its power producing devices to recharge them through the plugs, and when an accumulator is full, a circuit switch some building functions to feed from the accumulator instead of line, and your bill will be adjusted in function of the recharge you provide no hassle. We'll use geothermic heating a lot too.

And building a few reactors is allright, but planting them everywhere is just another reality invalidating argument, you cannot do that, and even if I shout criminality, insults and war, telling you shutting down Las Vegas video effects or controlling birthrate is better than planting another reactor, who really cares? You? As you build them along fault lines? In the wind? On the beach? And what the fuck are democratic politicians doing with their ass? Go vote! As you moralizing things into your children that will not survive your reality... Moralization is mainly for failed adults to whom you need to engrave a good consciousness with a hammer, btw, children learn simpler things by heart you know, moralization is harder there because the tools of sufficient comprehension are still under development (they are never totally built, it's a wheel of knowledge).

I tell you we are already in a load of problems with all the radioactive stuff that already exist, we are just at the beginning of that nuclear craziness, the reactors are brand new, the fuel is in the reactors, the bombs are still useable as well as the military machines, wait in 100 years, when you'll have 2000 reactors decomposing everywhere while having to pay for them, the whole earth will end-up dirty with radioactive soot, the water too, you think co2 is a big problem? Just wait, and there will be nobody to say it is a "natural" earth cycle because the earth went radioactive in the past, and there will be nobody to say he cared for the future or to make a better world or that he "loved" his children. And we'll die as lamenting weaklings praying gods on our knees, or partying, or depressing while throwing responsibility around.

As for mass death weapons, the life reality will carry on research and production potential to counteract terrorism, but we will never even think of using such devices on people, point, no bacteriological weapons, no chemical weapons, no atomic bombs, no spores, no fumes, no radiation. We're a reality as a whole anyway, we won't need these things. As for what this totally crazy out of its mind reality produced, we'll recycle it in general reactors, keep a few bunkered storehouses of useable materials, and a bunch of atomic bombs, for kicks, a few thousand among the ridiculous million pile that have been produced by people making sense and who voted yes for an atomic bomb by square kilometer of land on earth as a "defense" against a competing neighbor.

We'll do it once the reality balance is in place, just in case some evil thing shows its face. We can preserve a lot for the day when we'll be able to use them for space, relatively cheaply, like modifying those thrusters so they can send a payload to the moon and land as a potential base module. You could make a special atomic thruster from all the nuclear pellets, but that may not be a good idea, piling that stuff...But no problem shipping it to space since destructive effect remains the same on earth than in space, it would be better in space, in fact, teorically, and to get the same effect you only need a ball of steel (something simple to produce, and we'll have to be careful with that, not to crash cheap capitalistic competitive cargoes stamped "big balls of steel", right above the atmosphere...I mean, they don't have to be big, or maybe, I'm not so sure) You could attach a few to a small rocket covered with solar panels for placement or silent movement, that way, a calculated quantity of them can be sent in geosynchronous orbit around a few planets or moons. It is always useful to have a controllable powerful energy source, or bomb, if there's a hostile alien out there you wait when he sleeps and BAM! You kick its ass! I'm joking, but they could be used to blast meteors to smaller bits, or as mining tools too. There are uses to these things to help humanity and life, surely not destroy it for rich nationalist indoctrinated gods making a power-trip with their admiring racist groupie population.

We will eventually build nuclear reactors, but everything will be taken in consideration, including water pollution, land irradiation and cataclysmic activity, and don't tell me you're professionals doing it, one of the most important factor is wind direction, and if you look at where reactors have been planted in the U.S. it is evident that wind was the last of their concern; you think those things are invincible, like the Parthenon, that's what the scientist at Chernobyl believed he too. Presently there are nuclear reactors everywhere, you only need a few ones failing badly to intoxicate the whole planet, but it is imperative that we fill the planet with tax payers until everything blows to hell... We'll be half of present population in our reality for a starting goal, we'll do wonders with our economy, we'll have credits to do anything that make sense; the difference is that profiteers will be limited. As for nuclear power plants, we won't build one unless we have no choice, and the ones we'll receive from father reality are better be top notch, or they will be immediately rejected.

Societies will ideally develop the same way most farming villages become complete interdependent ecosystems, to minimize transport of all the different needed facets of it. And I'm not talking about magic and shamans, I'm talking about science to guide things, scientists and experts and professionals, they are the ones that are supposed to know the best way to do things well, if not they must be retrograded in title and pay, or find themselves another utility; there is not only science in life, some of the greatest architect would be bad scientists and vice versa, and science is not what it was 100 years ago, if you think every scientist makes great discoveries, you'll have to invent some, because practically all science today is heavily interdependent.

So we will arrange exploitation projects that will be taken care of by cultural society's bubbles like we did at home; we had chickens, ducks, rabbits etc. We took grain and straw from the neighbor, nontoxic grass all around, raised the animals, eat them and their eggs, dump organic residues in a drum for compost, made fishing flies from feathers, pillows with duck down, took all the excrements of our animals, mixed that with compost to fertilize a beautiful garden were we grew all kind of tasty vegetables including potatoes, then we used the forest around for trapping and fishing, gathering all kind of small fruits, made fruit jelly with the pectin from apples and we hunted a moose once in a while. Now, don't twist my words, I'm not saying that this is adequate for everybody, I'm saying we must use as many interrelations as possible close together to produce services and goods, and a cultural society specializing in beef got to have some tasty beef around, and its people amateurs of the food. Just don't forget that if the whole planet likes your beef it will become a reality recipe...

So people will eventually choose the best projects, while keeping in mind that pollution and experiments are better contained than expanded. A project is then given, evidently with help, to a chosen available cultural society that want to do it, it will make the whole functional and care for it. Priority is given to those that already have close ties to either a city or a structure, while not trespassing population limit percentage of that culture.

The way to see it is that everything is the terrain of the reality and cultural societies compete to exploit it and care for it, growing close related bubbles, or keeping some from the other reality. When the bubble, except for the cultural city or if there is only a few small ones, lose its efficiency or use, it is deflated to eventual abandon, which is done by the interdiction of resources spending for roads, new construction, new arrivals and birth rate in the place; some service will remain for people who will want to live the transition.

Territory outside bubbles is for everybody, unless an exploitation exists. The notion of national parks will disappear, all ecosystems will be watched and information about interdiction are sent to central computer, which includes fishing capacity of lakes and animal populations biodata, excellent competence exist for that, that's the good intent side of this reality showing I could say, because without this effort of protecting wildlife things would have failed long ago... Introduction of engineered species will be made in closed systems only, as exploitation systems, where things will be experimented over many years, while eliminating as much pollution as possible, particularly water pollution. Diversity is the goal, and that's the same with what we eat.

Presently, almost all of Quebec's wild life is divided as ZEC (Controlled Exploitation Zones), yes they protect some species, that's their minimal job, but the truth is that someone rent the ZEC territory and exploit it (exploitation zones) for profits, as long as they plant a warning about fires and at what date and where you can hunt or go fishing, and yes they make roads, no choice about it when you want to profit from something... Almost all the lakes are "protected" like that, if not the territory is under the control of outfitters which is still worse, and while they do the job of protecting some species and warning about fires, they do it for profits (which is logical in this reality), then they complain people don't like to go fishing and hunting anymore, tell me how, how am in supposed to find hundreds of dollars each time I want to go fishing? And I like fishing, but that activity is simply unavailable to me, eliminating one of my pleasures, one of my liberties, in the name of big profits for a few people.

When I was young we made a 4 wheeler trail through the forest to reach an inaccessible lake, to go there we had to pay for passage on a single ZEC, even if the destination lake was at the limit of another ZEC, but they grew so freaking greedy 2000 that now as soon as we set foot on the other ZEC, on foot through the forest after 6 hours of walking, we have to pay for passage on the other ZEC too; you have no right to touch 2 ZEC without having to pay double passage, even if you're on foot through the forest, if not you got to pay for yearly passes on 2 ZEC to go fishing in a single lake in surplus of the daily fares for fishing there. Today it can cost 500$ for 2 days going there, the trail and our family chalet (6 families) are left to decrepitude because nobody is interested in paying upward of a thousand bucks to pass a week there, we worked hard for this, spent tons of money for it, and they fucking destroyed our little paradise with their greed. And that's particularly ridiculous when you need 6 hours of walking getting there, you fish, eat, and the next day you must walk back home under the law. It is exhausting and not enjoyable when you'd like to relax and stay one week there. And we made the trail, and we built the chalets and we paid for all the permits, and how about upgrading the place? And I don't care they have to raise fishes to fill the most accessible lakes so people can pay big money to go catch them back, fuck you I say, fishing has almost become an activity limited the rich, we even have a red salmon river running just behind the house and only the rich have the means to catch salmons in there, and you better not try, they got a camp of watchdogs every few kilometers to keep it that way.

This is absolutely unacceptable to us, no divided territories for us, the whole planet (reality outside bubbles) is international territory, and guess what? We'll be far better at protecting wild life and it will be fair for everybody.

But we must still control and arrange space for more diversity in life. Since we like to profit from what wild life provides, whatever it's not the most productive, we'll try to make the market more open to such products. Actual fields that are not productive will be planted back with useful trees, ideally, fruit or wood productions. Trees can be bioengineered all we want for taste or benefits since they don't easily spread by themselves. Evidently a lot of wild stuff grows on razed mountains in a lot of areas, such possible places must be helped, they usually develop under power lines and places like that. Exploitation of bioengineered "little" fruits will be controlled though, the same for wood exploitation; wild wood is like wild fruits, so wood exploitations will be made like fields systems, forever producing without polluting; if you can't keep an area forever producing trees it means you're doing something wrong since wild life can do it, and do you think it would be a good idea to let you exploit wild forests if your way of exploitation makes the land sterile?

We will try to expand some fruit production in a more wild manner if they don't interfere much with existing wild life, to me, a tree is a tree, wildlife produces a set of trees that got this or that property, the difference is that it is grown without a labored land beside every tree, it reproduce by itself, and uses no insecticides, pesticides, fungicides, and fertilizers. Fruit trees that act in the same manner are excellent to mix in is what I say, and they don't reproduce easily by themselves so they cannot replace whole forests. We can try to have people doing this kind of job, implanting wild developed variant where appropriate, and not for industrial exploitation; for life. You plant them where they can grow and forget about it, they may not produce the giant apple or peach, but that's not the goal, and there is nothing wrong if people seek them for their own collecting. But it's just a suggestion because fruit development will become more of an emphasis in our reality, and they are very appreciated by wild animals too, and that's good since we'll want to eat more wild animals and tender ones that still have some sport and diversity in them.

Schools can help in these things too, understanding life with your feet is critical, there are many forest activities than can complement school teachings, so when seasonal work activities can be helped by students we'll definitively want their hands doing as much as possible. As a simple example, you can have local computer maps of fruit areas and go get some for making juice, or for adolescents; wine, while recuperating the less interesting stuff to go play kids violent games in forest areas, spreading some to wild animal which will be happy to eat them, or children can use them to learn hunting and trapping, eviscerating (yes that) and cooking.

Intensive grass or grain exploitations can be very polluting and soil degenerating, even if they are always necessary, less so if we're half the population, but a lot of grain can be replaced by all kind of things using less fertilizers or water or whatever, and if you can make grain dough, you can make spice or maybe even fruit or vegetables dough, how many grain dough? (Oat can count) A few ones and the diversity is limited because of profiting and needs, how many are possible from all kind of seeds, not only grain? If wheat hadn't existed, what would you had said? No dough for humanity? No, you'd have discovered some other seed that fit the criteria and developed it and it would presently taste as good at the same kind of price, probably, if not then we got to wonder what we're missing...

Most people are terribly limited in food diversity in the name of competition and publicized tastes hegemonies for making rich people, like crude milk, why is it worse than crude steak? How much diversity are we missing? Even if all diversity is a ridiculous goal too. It is not easy to develop and find out best appropriate forms, and you cannot do such exploration, in a worthy fashion, in a pyramidal reality situation since the poorer base is too large; even if food is food in the end. But better and more diverse food development need a comfortable and stable population, if not you only create "niche" and unfair markets, where the lower end people eat industrial super productive wine, chicken, beef, rice and stuff; in a sense you create the industrial population that come with it, low quality industrial people fed and produced at the chain that will submerge the intelligence of this reality, eventually. And I'm not talking about unfair competition and means which make it so that the selection in unfairly rich countries waste almost half the food they buy, except for inferior people like me; I don't waste food, maybe 1 percent of what I buy as food is wasted, and I'd bet that the poor in other countries don't waste their food either.

Now, a lot of this diversity is ready to explode, but because of old food industrials feeding the overpopulation that is made to need or want the old form, it stays limited to granola or exotic looking expensive stuff which I cannot buy; I must buy the cheap old momentum stuff, white flour which is just a monopoly of the earth, good because that's all we had for a long time, but tastes can change, even within a lifetime. I discarded white bread long ago, and I eat brown bread just like that, toasted with nothing on it, and to me all bread taste better than white bread. And I understand the burger problem, but the pub pits it against whole wheat which is the same seed, whole wheat burgers definitively don't taste that good, but there are other seeds you know, and I don't mean sesame seeds thrown on white bread.

I know, that's a domain where I'm guaranteed to make wrong declarations, but I know that for the rich, more people equals more money, and if they could feed 3/4 humanity with grass while keeping the competition, they'd gladly do it boasting that the system is the best since hunger is no more. Grain, or even rice, is not much better; didn't we evolve past that in old times? They distribute this like people are farm animals with a transform ability, and unless they're in cataclysmic troubles, they'll sell it to the people that often do the job of growing it while those same people survive mainly from that stuff, ridiculous, and those rich think they're good for doing it, that they got class at it; damn! My ass got more class than this attitude! Food man, food is one these sacred things you can't laugh at people with, maybe you need to be chained and put to work on rice fields at the whip for the rest of your life, carbureting on rice fumes at it.

Next, we will eventually try to find a better use for deserts too, that's the place to try things, surely there are means to make them a little better. There should be some encouragements for those cultural society expresses the will to develop bubbles in such extreme environments that we're supposed to survive, like doing big nature-science projects in Alaska or Siberia, other in more desert areas, more explicitly develop such lands with appropriate expertise and long term projects; surely we can plant special forests or power producing devices there instead of in green forest out of country competition, wind devices are perfect there, even if they are not as efficient as in Canada, the same with solar converters. But the last place you're supposed to build a vast city expanse is in a desert, particularly for fun (Las Vegas), that's why a society may have as a cultural facet the development of its structures as underground as much as possible; you'll save on acclimatizing while not "burning" rare water, exploiting and taking care of what the desert can provide as help to the reality, as long as you don't see the desert as your territory, since you are still under bubble principles.

There may be a few different cultural bubbles there, taking care of what is related to them as decided by the reality. Their bubble system may make a specialty of taking care of a million wind devices and solar converters while making research experiments too, growing their place to cultural city status developing more advanced uses and entertainment. If a mine is found, they may add it to their job if it is within easy reach, it would be better than a colony of miners, the same if a forestation project comes to exist.

And they're not choked in their possibilities, they buy and build what they want, the reality is there to impose the same fairness and limitations to everybody, what concern them is their concern, but a resource or big industry or a pollution or land is everybody's concern, and everything is taken in consideration; someone that makes the schematization for a new project may want it for his culture first and that will be taken in consideration too. What form the reality are cultural societies, absolutely nothing else, and what arises as creativity from them got to have a reflected effect there, when appropriate, but a gift is in order as a minimum, and creativity can take many forms and there are some that will be very good at producing creativity plans while bad at making them reality, and creativity includes scientific experiments.

Camps and small chalets can be built or bought by anybody with a dealable territory that cannot be razed for a vast lawn or asphalt, no asphalt connects them in any way, asphalt connects cities and "bubbles". These territories are meant to be covered by forest, your camp or chalet got to be harmonized with wild life, so you'll make a minimum of intervention to it; you can cut a few trees in front of it for the view, make a small lawn and small dock and that's it; trees must grow all around, a chalet is not a house, so we'll force limitation to size for sure.

Your place must be hard to see and the forest around must be complete, a forest is not only on the top of it, but on the ground too, no sanitized canopy to the end of sight, and no chemicals expending and dumping of wastes in water either. No problem with foot trails, they are good in all kind of ways, even for wild life, some small vehicles trails are not a problem either, without exaggeration always; it is not because there are 10 chalets around that you need 10 independent small vehicle trails.

The way to deal with territory is that a very limited quantity of square meters will be your territory, more is far more expensive, give it a square or rectangle or triangle form and build your structure on it. Next, there will be a minimum distance between each, maybe a few square kilometer, no structure of any kind there except a small organic dump and little interventions; your trail, removing a few trees that disturb you, a small garden in a sun spot, some traps, a small veranda or greenhouse, some wood collecting that you must see as optimizing for life (arrange the decor a little), a few discreet trees, but no summer chainsaw jobbing. No detritus, no fences, no nails on random trees, but you can mark with biodegradable fluo ribbon if you want.

Your place is your small chalet, the few square kilometer is a limitation to the number of them and a noise limitation too. Anybody can circulate anywhere, people are supposed to "stumble" on your place, but avoid; any proven snooping around will be punished. You can watch your things but don't point guns at people unless hostility, we'll have people specialized at that, they'll stroll about and if they find abuses you'll lose your chalet or worse. And if you want more living space, you may have a kind of storehouse basement or a third floor. To reduce carbon emission, you understand that you must reduce wood burning; plant a wind device or solar system on top of your chalet, or plant it behind to reduce wood burning and to have electricity.

As for weapons, high quality hunting ones can be rented 24/24 at convenience stores, or through your personal file, after a file check, and doing so will automatically enable the GPS function of your communication device, you can leave it at home, but you better carry it with yourself when you go hunting so you know where other hunters are, but knowing where you are will solely be available to our citizens, if you aint got a personal file you cannot access the function, and people without a personal file (can be temporary) are not supposed to be in our territory. You can check on an internet site to know what species you can hunt in which area, including people you can hunt for a reward too. You cannot kill wild life for fun or from collateral damage; you hunt to control a population or for food. The food must not be eaten by your dog but by you, if not, it must be sold or given. You can become a professional hunter if you want, just don't waste life, in which case you'll lose your privilege, so be careful not to become the hunted one, a few mistaken kills can happens, like for tastes (some animals within the same group simply taste bad, like some people smell bad), but people are supposed to have judgment, and a massacre is another manner, so for people who like to kill life for fun we'll have wild life protectors running about in our forests with your name on their list of not protected species...

It is another manner for exploitation, these are controlled by the reality, we will concentrate them to form cultural "bubbles" having the most use for the maximizing production to space versus pollution ratio. Contained pollution, even if it spread a little is nothing besides spread pollution of little yogurt garbage, but city and asphalt spreading everywhere is far worse. If we have something to learn from ants, it is that there is a lot of living space underground, they can develop underground space, we can do it too. Evidently, there are exceptions like big power production devices that pollute and destroy far more than smaller ones, and they come with a batch of costly gangs...

And talking of wasted meat, I'll add this about your wonderful meat, extra thin, red, 100 fresh parts, that tastes weird because it's full of steroids and life destroying antibiotics and preservatives, passed under healthy ultraviolet and insufflated with healthy poisons, and I'm not talking about the effect of growing the garbage at industrial level on the environment; you'll have to do far better, all industries that raise life for food will be under heavy scrutiny, and not at the top supreme worthless expertise and their regulations that are so effective those industries are surrounded by electric fences like protected secrets of state. I'll prefer people to develop local diversity, and to hell with industrialists of the beef if they only think profiting, beef machines pollute like crazy and eat too much. Industrial chicken, when everything is taken into consideration, is much better, better for the health, it pollute less and eat far less for its weight of production. But it's not a pretty industry as it is either.

And I didn't say no beef anymore, I said diversity of well treated animals, regular beef farms will do a far better job than industrialists with it, we'll make an emphasis to get the money off the industrial cow and pig and chicken to put more on good small farms, all cultural societies will have good medium pieces of lands for people to do local farming, I even think everybody should do some farming and gardenning but that's just me. And take care of those chickens because they'll start producing bad meat too, don't grow them too fast, they'll become deficient, and don't sell me fat or water.

And stop the duck stuffing for the rich, "farmer" from hell, and sorry for the hole in you, I'm nervous these days, but this is life, and this is food, 2 very fundamental things, and your minimal responsibility, as a farmer, is to act in a respectful manner with these 2 things, even if you dream of making it a profiting industry covering the planet, industrial farmer, with your publicized godly limited selection, godly farmer. I practically don't buy beef anymore, not worth the guessing in this load of PMBBD, cows taste bad but give me milk and that's it, no more cow death for me, it tastes bizarre, tanks to your stuffing it with tons of pharmaceuticals and boosters, the same those industrials are slowly doing with humanity...

I'm not talking about abandoning the genetic selection work of farmers, I'm talking about molecular insanities and exaggerations like spreading the giant cow all over the earth and spreading genetic fuel plant seeds in clouds. I never understood that one, why would you take precious space on earth while you still got fuel in the ground for a thousand years (they say)? Particularly when you take into consideration the fertilizers, insecticide, fungicides and bacteriopholides that will be used to grow petroleum. I personally think we still have 1/3 usable, the rest should stay there, there's something nagging me, like everything will die if we take it all, I wouldn't even be surprised if a lot replenishes if we're careful, because my this petroleum thing could be unknown territory, it could be as important as underwater currents or phreatic water filtering, some kind of mother earth milk. An and I'm not talking about bitumen sands exploitation, that is worse than anything, it is a crime to exploit this stuff and the industrials doing it along with the governments permitting it should be...well, you know, punched in the stomach so hard they disappear... So I guess yes we'll have to make fuel plants plantations, just to be on the safe side, and it's still interesting to know all the effects of producing equivalent fuel from plants.

Now, I could grow some more brain to play in house trading and mortgages stuff, so instead I'll say that things are done mostly right, the problem, as always, is profiting, using something that is forever there, lands, as a way to exploit people, and that's where I understand people because it is true that the way of the reality forces people to hold at pieces of lands like their life depends on it. They got to pay loads of money (life energy time) for it, which is a bad start, and build things while defending against throngs of vampires seeing everything as a source of profits, some invest their whole life to build a beautiful place only to end-up harassed to ruin paying taxes, and it is far worse than that.

And while it is true that when you pass a lot of time in a place you create an attachment, that's kind of normal, but a lot are faking attachment just to get more money too, give them enough and they'll manage to let go the place. A lot build things unconsciously seeing it as an investment they'll recuperate later, with an added value for sure, or they see it as a family dynasty; a little country for their family, and if they see they have the advantage they'll harass and cry until they die to get a compensation that is never enough, but yeah, you got to do it in this reality almost as a prerequisite... I know not everybody is like that, and I absolutely understand not only the soul of places, but their beauty too (except the rotten places I passed my life in, all mental institutes...), so it's kind of a stand-off. Many people got this tendency to understand only the aspect of things that serves them too, and often they are ready to fight to the death defending their wrongs, and for a lot, you wouldn't dare show them a different vision unless you walk on the same ground as them, I mean, while you were away developing your vision, they raped the world and now they try to make you feed on the leftovers. But that's not what I wanted to say, they got the means too, they decide, and they developed a manipulative coat of superiority that you are forced to develop too, and now you have to learn to walk their terrain, whatever they are morons, crazies or politicians, after busting your brain repairing all the crap they made in their entertainment party all the way to clown rocket society. And even after you finally manage to manoeuver their psychology because they are the first to point at your mental health, they'll still see you as a funny weirdo to exploit because you don't express yourself their way that they developed while you were away, particularly when they're well accumulated, with an attitude dependent social circle, they know everything profoundly, they're on god's path, like many religious people (not all, there's a difference between being indoctrinated and trying to add spiritual value to one's life), and they're susceptible, etc, etc, etc, and I just wanna cry of despair.

The idea is that you can develop a land under some constraints or ideals as long as there is no better use to it, that's how you must see it; it seems weird to me to force people to enrich some gangs by spending their money on lands that future generations may need differently developed, particularly if some other gang enrich themselves making speculation of their future worth. Lands are used following an ideal, raising a family from love is such an ideal. You buy it, give it added value, you die, it goes back to your society, which will sell it back to proportionally added value (all the terrain of the cultural society gain value from what people build on it, but the global value should remain the same, so in a sense the value here represent a ladder of price that should remain the same, it's just that terrains jockey for position on the ladder, an our top ideal people always get better choices than their ancestors, it's a wheel.

Reality decides the best use of lands, people as a mass decide how lands are to be developed, but at the base the process is simple; lands will mostly be made available for cultures development, then space can be temporary rented or bought by people who will develop it, and that can last as long as the reality or cultural society doesn't change its mind. Land space is a permanent limited resource which can take any valuable form depending on high consciousness energy investment on it. That's how you got to see it to make it fit in the "economic' system of the reality, while knowing that everything starts on lands and its development is never final. If you don't think of what people do out of it, lands can be seen as a simple resource, so the reality will distribute lands possible developments to cultural societies (different zonings, can be dealt with the culture), and its trade market will deal with subsequent exchanges of it, including developments. So the reality (people), with as much data as possible, will decide how lands will be used, and that can be achieved with zoning and land sizes according to zoning possibilities, right down to the meter under fairness laws as a first layer, and the culture do the rest. If a bubble must exist it is first delimited by the reality with added fairness laws like you cannot have 2 terrains for a home, but you definitively need malleable options for a terrain. Once the culture got its zoning plan accepted by the reality, or the other side around, people trade terrain simply, or bring their projects as some gross but credible plans, of what they want and where, to the cultural society A&D level of decision.

Malleability means people can ask for expansion if their project takes excellence form, or understandable new needs arise, have judgment, and that applies to small terrains with small homes that may eventually want a big garden, you can add some space for it, since it's hard to say a garden is a negative thing, but always in an optic of fairness, you don't take loads of space someone else may want.

Intuits represent well some extremes, I like them, they have their own language, they develop well in their environment while developing a culture, a history, I'd be ready to bet they are far more capable than many other very populating people... But like everybody else, since cultural societies must see themselves as bubbles on lands belonging to all, they won't be able to transform stuff beyond their bubbles which may expand needing more territory, but the territory around their bubbles must be seen as empty of specific people, only small chalets there, and you may meet anybody. They'll need to accept a way to provide the basis, and they'll have to contribute to the education of our experts on fauna who will help manage life around.

A society can grow its importance by being the one to take care of reality's accepted projects for a place, that's how it will work; if the reality wants to plant an industry near an Inuit bubble, or if they want to plant one themselves, the reality will have to take many factors into consideration, like population limits, other bubble kind and capacities.

Evidently, a cultural society works a lot on its own, it grows its bubbles alone within some limitations, they do their small industries themselves, entertainment and things like that, the reality just quickly watch if they don't cross some limitations, but bigger projects need reality's involvement and so they are mainly judged as independent from cultures, without being heartless. Someone developing a big project logically will want to care for the project, which is particularly true if it's the culmination of big science, but the reality (concerned people), still has the final word. The reality will seek the best options for the means it will spend on the project, a choice of cultures already bubbled there, maybe adding a new bubble to stretch the presence of a farther entity, or a cultural that already developed an expertise on the matter may get the contract, followed by the original team, or it could be made in a place that has many other benefits to implant a brand new culture since it's something big.

But everything is related, we don't make a vegetable soup, a new cultural society may create a bubble anywhere there is a need for a valuable population mass, for a start, and it can have future new bubbles or where there is already one of its kind that is connected, you must see it somewhat like countries, but made of attached bubbles "bubble complex" and not vast territories, connected to a cultural city and the ideal is for the lot to eventually connect to a flower type city.

There is nothing to stop entrepreneurs to make things to a basic standard too, or even develop the whole place in advance; it's all a question of the culture view, while being in harmony with reality's ways. And don't forget the basis principle; the reality will want the culture to be proud of its designs to provide the basis, and everything that shows adequate independence is rewarded, but we'll want a culture to feel it's worth it to help itself by getting involved to the maximum of its abilities.

Now, to fit the system, outside bubble terrains will be sold by the reality, that mostly concerns small chalets. Evidently, when you trade back a terrain, you do it with what have been made of the place, in a maximum of facets, which is definitively not an easy thing when you think of all the related objects and investment of life energy on the place, so you make the closest approximation and that's it. Those professions will be important, but in our reality, things got a tendency to be "centralized" so you will have better access to the value of things (green value), which is supposed to be related to all high consciousness investment of time and morphing of value from reality in the creation of things, including lifetime. But even these values will not always be easy to deduct, and we start little. Evidently, it's hard to do worse than father reality on that, where the true value of most things is lost somewhere because there was no computer base to organize well and keep a good enough track of energy expenditures as competition twisted everything. Yes it will sometimes be weird for us, particularly since we'll get free productions that will devaluate what we'll do, but that can be compensated, and it will be easier once thing are in place and functioning as perfect as possible with renewed expertise to always understand well.

Since lands are a reality or culture thing, people may decide anytime, from appropriate A&D level, to change development strategy of lands, the decision is taken by concerned people, so individuals affected by such changes have nothing to say anymore about it. Evidently, things can be made in sense, in the situation of a house, a one year preparation is a must, the house will be moved if it's not too much trouble, but generally you'll trade what you can or let the reality do it and what's left is bought by the reality for an adequate compensation.

You don't have to panic and see it as a big bet, it's the reality's job to accept adequate zoning, the reality is careful, it should happen very rarely, at least no more than presently. And it is your bet too, you may be the unlucky one but a lot of things in life are bets, more than you think. Anyway, if you want to see it that way, you're taking a bet that you trust reality to have chosen well its development path, and you always have a basis to be sure that you don't end-up in troubles.

For already existing homes all that may seem terrible but it's just a warning that the reality may want to develop territory differently, probably more than 75% of homes and their territory are perfect for our reality, we surely won't demolish everything to build anew, but since we are far less people, we won't need that many homes, we will recycle or raze some less pretty stuff, but no burning; we burn nothing since co2 levels and air pollution levels are already critical.

This recycling will mostly be the case for what is ugly or cheap, particularly mobile, repetitive homes, building for profits and the likes. New homes will be built to be far more eco-friendly.

Homes will mainly be meant for families, they will have to be made cute appropriate along with the terrain. You do what you want but it must be cute, and cute things are not necessarily expensive or hard to do, make a wild flower forest with trails in it if you want. I'd say most of father reality's people developing their terrain do it very well, but I don't like vast lawns, they are as bad as asphalt, sometimes even worse.

Houses should contain a minimum of 2 people living there permanently ideally. You raise a family is the ideal. We won't force things but loners should refrain. One of your children may stay a big part of his life there, and once back alone, we'll like it better if you involve someone else or another couple who will occupy an independent part of the house, you could even make an arrangement through your file for someone to contribute to everything while living there, or they may be a forming family that will eventually want to take over the house. You can build or buy houses along asphalted roads outside bubbles, if they have not surpassed their population limit. Rare asphalt is spread to rejoin houses, asphalt connect bubbles, or a community of houses. A single house is not a bubble, unless it is in close proximity to grow one while adopting the ways (language and all) of the bubble and working there.

As for current big houses with expansive lawns, where rich "couples" without children live a few weeks a year, these will be used all year round, whatever they're big impressive castles; they are too expensive to sustain and take place, usually the best places. We'll prefer to give a bonus to a big family that wants to take care of one, but some will be better used as stores or hostels or museums, things like that.

All those big luxury homes and castles and yachts and churches, and personal planes and marvels blessed in evil pockets are a ruin to everything; you think it is a good thing that the rich overload the place with it? You are already spending so much to keep these luxury things standing that there is already half a billions people who exist solely for that, there is forever more luxury marvels and permanent catastrophes to care for, this reality is ruining itself keeping that stuff forever standing through history, the same for rich people, and people like me are fingered as being too costly. Soon an increase in comfort will be a fantastic dilemma, a ridiculously inhuman one, and we are already at this point.

So all these things exist to serve rich people, and they are extremely expensive to run. Luckily most of it can be used differently, some more recent ships and planes can be stored, they're always precious, and we'll not want to later regret scraping them. Rich houses will be emphasized for bigger families in true love to own them instead; a population minimum may be imposed, and wouldn't it be cool to have the biggest families born out of love owing the most beautiful places? Even if most are still precious things we'll want to preserve, we will recycle a lot, this is a life reality, no choice about it, and it is definitively not one of our main priorities to keep very costly objects standing in the way; we'll choose people instead.

Yet, what is mainly meant to collapse is old stuff, logically, that's what a clean-up means, you remove ugly and stinking stuff, and that applies to mentalities. Sure that if we're replacing thing in a better order of priorities, we may have to crack open a few rich homes to reveal hidden evils, and their women. The same for the glasses and dresses and shoes and things for the rich, these can now be produced far more cheaply, it's just that the rich stuff got a tendency to come with a "homosexual attached" kind of sticker that fill the pockets of some leech sticking to things with designer signature becoming rich from drawing a little; any game artist beats that in a day in true value of artistry. And don't think you got a monopoly of imagination, "designer" I'll kick you off the cake anytime, you're an insignificant detail, and a very expensive one for such. We don't need you to produce cool glasses, forget it, people do such things by default, no need to condemn them to your hands because you're a big ego and you'd like to make a family dynasty from it. A shirt is a shirt, glasses are glasses, they're not people, I absolutely don't want to have a face in my memory associated to my things, you pollute my head, eat dirt, what you produce and sell is nothing, PMBBD hype. I don't like dresses with a signature, for me each mean a little condemnation of humanity, a little, a little, and a little.

The new reality is not a final thing, when we'll be successful we may select big slabs of land to experiment different ways to deal with life and people over very long time. Maybe we'll become a father reality someday (on another planet), but our main goal is not to try things eternally on earth, our main goal is to colonize another planet which can help us colonize another one or do extraordinary projects.

And father reality, even if it's not getting any better, it will have to exist for as long as necessary, minimally, but it is his decision to continue, the strongest form it took could keep on going, like a big part of the U.S. or many representative countries could keeping a minimalist version running, like a cultural root, or sit down and smoke a pipe for the rest of its existence and die out of cancer, his choice, but we prefer him healthy and helping, even if it's only to show old tricks and secrets. And nobody have to be jealous, particularly conquerors, you'll all have a place in the new reality, and the U.S. was the exemplary leader of opening its borders to the world, did you accept the invitation? Yes, all of you, and there are some of you everywhere in the U.S., as there will be in the new reality. And I don't care it was made out of a racist competition of countries, the result is there, whatever the English white were the first or the boss, one had to take that position, that's the way of the ego-god ideal, that's how it works; help now, time is running out. And don't base your judgment on my attitude, I could write a whole page to talk respectfully to every susceptibilities to no avail, I'm not a democratic politician, I have social assistance, they say...

To go back to population, not going over 18 million people mean you can even have a single 18 million city if you absolutely want it and it fits our standard, but that's the sole bubble you will have, and you'll never have the opportunity to develop in many places on earth. A cultural entity can have as many as 3 bubbles systems at different places on earth, as long as their total don't go over 18 million in population. As for building "flower" cities, if father reality wants to preserve all its vast cities, then we'll build ours elsewhere, even if all the best spots have been taken. It's written somewhere (on a broken tablet) that a civilization should have the maneuvering capacity of evacuating one city at a time, so get to work, evacuate. That sounds weird but we'll want to provide that after some time.

I'll add that the life reality is not a "revolution" for city people to profit from; if you "love" your cities, stay in them. Don't get all excited from your pseudo superiority, evolution and openness that is exactly the contrary, city people are a condemnation, only a minority look at the true reality of the city they live in. Furthermore, a new reality is not a justification to go crazy because it is "new" or "wow", leaving your city of "love" for a village because it is green and near wild life not destroyed for a job or fun yet, building and polluting all over, ending-up make those same cities elsewhere because you understood nothing.

The higher the percentage of humanity of our idealist number that wishes to be a part of the newborn reality the more land we have the right to add, piece by piece. Any tentative by a factions to terminate, or stop the process of transfer of land and resources to, or compete, brainwash, bullshit, the newborn growing reality is an act of war. Once it have proven its viability in a free state of mind, you cannot starve it, you must justly give it the means to grow; controlling competition is a cheater's win and it's of no use building another reality when you know you'll be competed, even through birthrate, and controlled to eventual failure by cheaters.

Did I attain my original goal? I mean, did I do enough culture stuff to get that trophy?...I think so, this way of things is fair for everybody, there's highly protected developing diversity potential, every culture can have a place and expand without exaggeration, they are guaranteed to always exist, they can develop their things in peace without jealous invaders around, a systematization of good exist to associate everybody as a civilization with enough power to systemize space, and wars become very limited; maybe cultural societies could each have a company of peltasts or something similar, with plastic weapons, and play some kind of chess Olympic game, to simulate war.

I'm absolutely not finished yet, there must exist an attachment between realities, a structure of fairness for both of them, something controlling limited resources exploitation, big research, pollution production, birth rate, military machines and devices development too; that is the reality balance (When a limit is changed by the balance there is a certain lapse of time permitted for realities to adapt before more drastic measures are taken). No new reality without that one, but with it the actual reality structure of things will eventually be looked upon as old colonizing times.

For now, one "invincible" obstacle is city or urban expanses slowly invading the world, they are a condemnation and terribly negative as vastly spread, whatever I'm impressed by some facets of the work. That's the idea for flower cities, they are not necessarily as concentrated as the one I'll design, but the idea is to really shrink these cities and neighborhood spread, in fact I'll give you a tip so you understand the ideal here and don't confound everything to low level socialism and build the same ugly thing all over the place; there shouldn't be 2 buildings the same, do that and everything will be allright, I know that's ridiculous, but think of the effect of removing all copies from a city, you'd have to shrink it so it make sense. The problem here is that I'm not sure if people can appreciate, I know I could live in one, so I may be the bottom of adaptation for that, but I really think that if there's a problem it's psychological, and if so time will be our friend, that is, if there's a difficulty. I say most vast cities would be better abandoned to humility in the name of a better future. Some can have valuable parts adapted as bubbles, but some simply can't fit our mentality, so we won't take them until we're we'll advanced, at which point we'll see. When we'll eventually be suggested one that is in a problematic situation mentally, or for the planet's environment or security of people, like Montreal, we'll ask for evacuation, recycle all asphalt and useful materials, clean some toxins, plant a bunch of trees, then leave it to nature. We don't demolish for nothing.

Yet, we'll still want to preserve many cities while removing cheap, ugly or dirty stuff or whatever clean-up we'll want to do, and when that will happen, controlled demolishing is the sole option, no burning. But we don't want demolisher to be scared of touching buildings like they're in Chernobyl, and many buildings are almost ready to give a fight so full of dirty life and spores they are. Anyway, while the building is standing, you got the time to sit a little and study the best options for it.

I'm sure that if we took a team of engineers and scientists we could develop heavy robotic machinery more efficient than human hands to dismantle buildings, even the worst ones, relatively cleanly. But there are many options, and new machines will come with the new reality's needs, and their blueprints will be developed and made by father reality in associated expertise at the same time the reality simulation gets done. Just remember that such machines are meant to gain efficiency not lose it, so everything will have to be taken into consideration.

As an example, you may have to build a moving recycling industry which can be quickly mounted and dismounted to temporarily serve an area where basic stuff gets filtered and loaded in appropriate different trucks, things like that. So apart from getting associated, developing a simulation, kicking evil, dealing with history and far more, in my job creation and allocation load, we'll need many people for asphalt, concrete, steel, brick and wire recycling, working to undo a lot of work done for wrong reasons and not enough judgment and foresight by people seeking profits and people working blindly on things that take space, pollute, don't last in their efficiency and condemn to mediocrity.

Father reality can do everything in a kind of preparation for the new way, the life reality may not come your way, but if it does it will definitively want to preserve valuable work that has been done. But that will not concern vast city expanses, there are not many good solutions for a many million people city to transfer to our reality, it may be too hard to selectively clear people while keeping city integrity, unless you radically evacuate them by sending an envelope full of white powder to the mayor... Is it is preferable to cause a medium pain to a thousand people each year, or a big pain to a million people in one shot? I don't know, I'd have a tendency to believe the former, so maybe such evacuations could be systemized from new birth control laws, preserving some cities while slowly evacuating others, I don't know but we can only accept their integration if they fit an acceptable design. For decrepit expanses, we will probably put these place under surveillance until they becomes international territory (dangerous places and tourism infrastructures is preserved, the same for fauna agents or any expertise (can be local communities) of the land, ideally. We will recycle until a strategy of development is designed, and that can as well be total leveling, or abandon to nature, or reformulation as a cultural city (normal city) from already existing stuff; but those projects are supposed to be made in advance. As for transferring whole vast cities with the people in them, I didn't say it was impossible, but that's kind of the biggest challenge of a piece of land to transfer to the life reality, but yes, it can be done, an expertise team reworking the design can make it adaptable to us, and through many steps transform it to be acceptable within 25 years, 25 years should create an acceptable curve in people's life, not break it.

We'll invest in quality roads and things, but lifetime must come with it. As usual, the current levels of expertise to do everything well is excellent and available, I surely won't doubt father reality capabilities at building beautiful or impressive things, as for quality, that's variable depending on many factors, and competition in such matters is as good as it is bad, probably more bad than good though. However, such expertise is expensive and on high demand, even if we'll absolutely want it, like advanced computers; good people in a good reality working for good do better.

We can say that the first flower city, which will be one heavy project, will coincide with top motivation, and hype levels (I would say there's no difference between natural hype and artificial hype, but yeah, there's a difference, the intent, always the intents, if you start in deception then you'll not only reap the deception of not getting what you invested in the way you thought, but you'll feel cheated at it, it's kind of 50%, your lack of judgment (your fault) or it was a sham (not your fault), your choice, frustration proportional to investment of means). Hype is not necessarily a bad thing it just happens with hope, it always exists, want it or not, people grow and reduce things on the fly, particularly with imagination, and motivation have nothing to do with good or evil, for that you need understanding and consciousness, so hype can be used to do either, depending on your intentions. Hype is for temporary motivation, exactly, people must know it and that's it (you can be "motivated" through PMBBD to buy something always "new" that always kill microbes twice as hard than the competition, but be careful with that, and with competition too, microbes can become big and intelligent...).

So, we will need heavy plans and heavy expertise appropriate to this will and appropriate to our goals, we'll have to keep that expertise developing and transmitting too, and that includes all sciences, with some exceptions like the science of the politician. Everything will slowly be made to reality standards, and the emphasis for faster reality expansion will be made by updating what already exists, but there will still be steps and limits, everything done under control while the expensive reality morphing machine gets built in all its facets (plans of systemized changes) and gain reality morphing momentum (tested and working). That's an expensive machine which comes with 100 000 scientists, engineers, architects, specialists; a million workers. There will be costly failures too, always happens in one's life, like I tend to think this reality is near of becoming one...

At this point, you almost got the simple, global view of how things will work, you understand that what I see as the reality is the simplest association of humanity that can be made; it is meant to be as easily understood as possible. That simple basis philosophy extend to all main necessity spheres of our reality. Every tools exists to systemize things in a far better way, and competition is not an option in this situation, we have to develop a new reality like it's our most precious creation. And while I'll emphasis the nonviolent way for its birth as a priority, I'm not stupid. You know from previous chapters (books) how I see this reality as condemned in a multitude of ways, if I could do or think otherwise I would not explore violence and war as an option for its birth, but in the face of the developing end, I'm ready to fight for life. I've chosen my way of dealing with people, you know it, my view of good and evil, and it is totally in harmony with my thinking, my ideals, my beliefs, and my dreams too. You already know that the life reality can be given birth without violence if the necessary association exists, not a few but a lot, working with good will, not thinking the poorer must do it, investing money and energy for the necessary expertise, with proofs of advancements, modifying some priorities for it; what is necessary is good will.

Finally, people should be careful of what the strongest members of this reality will say, that this or that facet can't work; manipulation is the top brick of this reality. You'll have to convince me with an argument that shouldn't exist to make me believe my vision is impossible. We should be particularly careful of spies and infiltrated traitors too, there are powerful people who won't be happy about a different way of things, and they may try to cause the long term failure of the project to prove that the current system is the best or only possibility for good life development. Particularly during design, some may try to modify insignificant looking things based on psy or scientific expertise "proving" my view is wrong, like the mixing racial percentage of people in cities which must not sway too far from my calculations without causing fundamental principles problems. Don't think evil people have enough of the mess they made of this reality, they'll will attack, contort and invent problems where there are none, make you feel cheap or bad, and the capacity of their success will be ego proportional (meaning that you may catch someone sabotaging for his own reasons, and the damage will be limited, but you will hardly catch a spy sent by the U.S. government, and the damage will meant to fail the new reality, a little virus in your first power plant, a few "accidental" structural crashes with a high death tool, or a propaganda campaign to instill jealousy or competition, or nostalgia.

Next chapter (book) is a continuation of this one, but the emphasis is about creating the first flower city. The chapter after that one is where I'll explore how the new reality can be given birth, be it peacefully or violently.

This drawing somewhat shows how I see things for cultural entities associated to a flower city on the southern part of Quebec. This is just an example, and the bubbles are disproportionate for better sight, big bubbles are cities of around one million people, small bubbles are villages or towns. (Back to page).
