 
_Big Ban Theory  
Elementary Essence Applied to Carbon  
and Sunflower Diaries 2nd and 3rd_

_Volume 6_

By Rod Island

Copyright © 2014 Rod Island

All Rights Reserved

SmashWords Edition

License Notes: This eBook is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This eBook may not be resold or given away to other people. If you would like to share this book with another person, please purchase an additional copy for each recipient. If you're reading this book and did not purchase it, or it was not purchased for your use only, then please return to SmashWords.com and purchase your own copy. Thank you for respecting the work of this author.

Please check out my other books.

Big Ban Theory

5) Big Ban Theory: Elementary Essence Applied to Boron and Sunflower Diaries 1st, Volume 5

6) Pending

["Big Ban Theory" Series]

Sunflower Diaries (UNPUBLISHED)

Sunflower Diaries: Cryptology Applied to Basic Math and Current Technology, Volume 1 (UNPUBLISHED)

["Sunflower Diaries" Series (40 Volumes)] (UNPUBLISHED)

Magical M.E. (UNPUBLISHED)

Magical M.E.: Washington Wizardry Applied to 5/29 of 2013, Volume 1

["Magical ME" Series (40 Volumes)] (UNPUBLISHED)

1) Big Ban Theory: Elementary Essence Applied to Hydrogen and the Winter's Tale of Why Valentine's Day Got Canceled, Volume 1 (UNPUBLISHED)

["Big Ban Theory" Series] (UNPUBLISHED)

Big Ban Theory (UNPUBLISHED)

1) Big Ban Theory: Elementary Essence Applied to Hydrogen and the Winter's Tale of Why Valentine's Day Got Canceled, Volume 1 (UNPUBLISHED)

["Big Ban Theory" Series] (UNPUBLISHED)

* * *

[Interview with Rod Island on SmashWords]

## Table of Contents

Carbon 6.1: Exile of A-Rod

Carbon 6.2: "Chuck vs. the Greatest American Hero"

Chapter 2.1: Inkblots, Pyramids, and Perceive Patterns

Chapter 2.2: Lottery Drawings

Chapter 2.3: Louis Braille and Hermann Rorschach's Inkblot Test

Chapter 2.4: Illuminati Pyramid and the Esoteric

Chapter 2.5: Fuzzy Logic Approach, Zeeman Effect, and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

Chapter 2.6: Higgs Boson

Chapter 2.7: Sunflower Diaries, Volume 2 Conclusion

Chapter 3.1: Volume Discounts and the Fashion Industry Analogy

Chapter 3.2: Fashioned Fashion and Runway Modeling

Chapter 3.3: Fashion Sense and Whether You Wear Make-Up?

Chapter 3.4: Sewing Together Materials and If Your Parents Still Dress You

Chapter 3.5: You Have No Close

Chapter 3.6: Walking Away from the Fashion Industry

Chapter 3.7: Sunflower Diaries, Volume 3 Conclusion

Carbon 6.2: Conclusion

## Carbon 1  
Exile of A-Rod

My original plan was to include the Preface from "Big Ban Theory," Volume 5 in front of every volume thereafter to bring people up to speed. It's because I wanted people to be prepped and know what happened with this volume series and the rest of my published works.

However, I changed my mind. It's not really necessary. I just realized that sometimes you just need to let people find it themselves. Sometimes if you provide too much information, you actually hurt yourself. When people are ready for it, they'll ask for it rather than ramming it down their throats.

* * *

I'm going to do a rundown of the news articles for 6/21 of 2014. I had stated in the Preface from "Big Ban Theory," Volume 5 that my goal was to prove that the Associated Press Feed will mirror whatever I wrote in a 24 to 48 hour period. The nice part is that since I'm just republishing work with information redacted, I can make the calendar dates that were written in publications between 12/14 of 2012 and 6/15 of 2014 become anchored to events that happened in 2014.

1) News for 6/21 of 2014 cited the  exile of Alex Rodriguez

2) My name is Rod

3) A Rod = Rod

4) I have been "exiled" and banned by [Redacted] on Second Life

I claim that the news article seen here regarding A-Rod is a reflection of what happened in the Psychic Field. Because the blowback from it caused a shake-up in the Electromagnetic Field with the Psychic Field, there was a ripple effect.

Now, of course, I concede the dispute between A-Rod and the Major League Baseball Association has been going on for months. However, as the news unfolded, I claimed that the events unfolding in my life were set to coincide with that. It's the same with President Barack Obama awarding that medal to "that soldier" from "Flow/Ood," Mississippi on 6/19 of 2014.

There was also another article.

1) In the previous volume I cited World of WarCraft. I had has been talking about Tank Carradine referring to the theme of the tank.

2) In one of my volumes, I had once cited that actress Yvonne Strahovski of the television show "Chuck" was in my software program

3) I had named a World of WarCraft character after her

4) In "Chuck vs. the Greatest American Hero," Yvonne Strahovski's character says "Thank you for the Tank"

5) Yvonne Strahovski was born 7/30

6) Soccer player Hope Solo from Washington State was born 7/30

7) News for 6/21 of 2014 reported  Hope Solo was cited in a domestic abuse case regarding her sister and nephew

8) On Second Life, I was talking to Elysia who said that one of the 5 things people are seeking is "hope"

Elysia gave me permission to cite her Family Tree because I am no longer allowed to use [Redacted]. So I thought I'd try to substitute in new numbers to see if I can get them to show more clearly in the Associated Press Feed.

1) Elysia was born 8/12

2) She said she loves Jim Morrison who was born 12/8 (like my mother and the reversal of her birthday)

3) Her daughter was named Virginia

4) The father of Virginia was born 8/21 when Hawaii became a state (my stepdad is from Hawaii)

5) The person "Virginia" (Elysia's daughter) was born 3/3 when Florida became a state

6) Virginia became a state on 6/25

7) Florida rejoined the Union on 6/25 of 1868 after the Civil War

8) I said I had 2 pets on Second Life in 2010 who were both born 9/10

9) One pet Houston was from Virginia that became a state on 6/25

10) The other pet was named Britain in Florida that rejoined the Union after the Civil War

I had to look through my hard drive to find the original passage where I had talked about my 2 pets, and I found it. It was in Chapter 10 of "Sunflower Diaries: Cryptology Applied to the Sun as an Ovum, Gladiator, Andromeda Ascendant, and Jerry Maguire, Volume 24" published on 3/10 of 2013.

"Tommy Leonetti was born 9/10 of 1929. He died on 9/15 of 1979, which is the birthday of actor Tommy Lee Jones who was in "Men in Black" about aliens. Back in 2010, I had two "pets" on Second Life. Both of them were "coincidentally born on 9/10. One was living in  Virginia that became a state on 6/25 of 1788. My other pet was in  Florida that rejoined the Union on 6/25 of 1868 after the Civil War."

I included the original link for "Sunflower Diaries," Volume 24:

https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/294096

Unfortunately, because of the gag order and where I've been muzzled, the original volume has been blocked off where you can't download it anymore. It's still there, but it's under lock and key by a 3rd party.

This hurts my case in trying to prove that my Subconscious Mind was "unconsciously" printing information storing and recording the calendar dates in 2013 and coordinating efforts with other Subconscious Minds to make calendar dates align in 2014.

The only people who know are the ones who downloaded the copies of my volumes before the books were taken offline. So there are some floating copies that belong to readers that got them prior to 6/19 of 2014 when the books were blocked from future distribution.

SmashWords.com was my 3rd party source where the web site would tag a calendar date of publication showing that I had submitted my work on a particular date along with a time stamp. So if I published something on 3/10 of 2013 about Pink Carnations and Red Pick-Up Truck in my book and news for 3/11 of 2013 had a front page news article about a Red Pick-Up Truck that spilled Pink Carnations all over the highway, that's how you'd establish a Psychic Prediction using an eBook.

It's where you wrote something before it happened and a 3rd party had documented when your submission was made.

That's how I was using my volume series as a large database of written material with calendar dates where I could cite what I said a year ago in 2013 and then point to how it aligns with something that happened in 2014 with the same tags and the SmashWords.com web site would indicate that the manuscript with the Psychic Prediction was uploaded on this date and there had been no tampering or editing of the document since that date.

That's what makes me different from other Psychics.

Most experienced and legitimate Psychics are over the age of 50 and they don't really know how to use the Internet. I'm going to be 40 years old on 5/29 of 2015, and I had a head start on using the Internet when I was a freshman in college. So I'm used to using social media and wireless technology integrated into my Psychic Abilities.

I'm really good at what I do as a Psychic Computer Programmer because I'm continually working with numbers. Just like Neo in the "Matrix," I can see the computer code of Earth as a Super Computer. When I'm scanning the Associated Press Feed, I'm watching the green symbols dripping down the computer monitor.

I can link this to Yvonne Strahovski

1) She was dating actor Matt Doran who was in the "Matrix"

2) Matt Doran was born 3/30 when Texas rejoined the Union after the Civil War

3) My aunt is named Florida and celebrates her birthday on 3/30 for Texas

4) Florida became a state on 3/3 for Elysia's daughter named Virginia

5) Elysia's eldest daughter was named Trinity for Carrie-Ann Moss as Trinity in "Matrix"

6) Carrie-Ann Moss was born 8/21 when Hawaii became a state and the husband of Elysia

Now, of course, I can't verify that I was talking to Elysia on Second Life or that we had a discussion about the word "Hope" aligning with Hope Solo. That's only just something between the 2 of us. Only she was there to confirm it. I suppose I could try getting a written statement from her and cite her as a source with her E-mail, but I don't think it's necessary.

## Carbon 2  
"Chuck vs. the Greatest American Hero"

The reason why Hope Solo is significant is because I had a discussion with [Redacted] where there was a comparison to Hope Solo's "Dancing with the Stars" performance to [Redacted] working in the Psychic Field. [Redacted] had a really good aptitude.

On a side note, I would point out that in IMDb, it says that Hope Solo is linked to Krista Tesreau born [Redacted]. Because of the gag order, I'm not allowed to discuss [Redacted] or show the alignment of the birthdates that can be used to tag [Redacted] and [Redacted]. However, I was pointing out that Miss Alabama Katherine Webb aligns with [Redacted] and is engaged to [Redacted] whose initials as the [Redacted] and [Redacted] translate to the creation date of [Redacted].

Readers, or even the attorneys, may think I'm being a smartass with what is [Redacted], but I'm trying to show how human thinking of what you can and can't discuss is mostly about people's names or mention of them. It wasn't really designed to extend to people's birthdates.

I may no longer be able to talk about [Redacted] or [Redacted] birthdates, but I can cite other people who have the same birthdate as [Redacted].

Here's where it starts getting murky with the law and how you interpret information.

If it is still deemed that citing [Redacted] with a specific birthday qualifies as still talking about then, it's use of substitution. They're linking the birthday of [Redacted] to indicate that I'm still talking about [Redacted].

For example:

1) I'm born 5/29

2) I am the person born 5/29

3) Let's say I ate cookies

4) You caught me eating cookies

5) I made you swear not to tell anyone or mention my name as the guilty party

6) Your parents ask you who ate the cookies

7) You say, "Someone born 5/29 in this house ate all the cookies"

Did you actually break your promise to me and rat me out? You didn't say my name. You just provided information that points to information that is tagged to someone where you know that it would have to be me if I'm the only person living under the roof born 5/29.

As a Psychic Mathematician, I use Substitution all the time.

Hope Solo = 7/30 = Yvonne Strahovski

When you say Hope Solo is Yvonne Strahovski, you're looking for a bridge or something that connects them so that one variable will become equal to the other. You just need to solve the equation.

That's why I keep talking about Earth as a Super Computer where you can plug into Earth's Electromagnetic Field as a Communication Grid and upload Psychic computer software. Your software will run so long as the numbers and the equation you use fit within the computer language that the computer is using.

I've been trying to say that Earth as a Super Computer uses a Human Computer Language. Humans build the Computer Language that is fluid and changes over the centuries, but Earth as a Super Computer will use whatever humans build.

My claim is that if citing a number that happens to align with someone I'm not allowed to speak of is breaking the gag order, then it means that when I use substitution to cite the Sun and Earth that will use an "Acupuncture Notecard" System using substitution of numbers and symbols should also be valid.

The Sun and Earth using numbers should also count.

I said in my Preface of "Big Bang Theory," Volume 5 that I met a waitress named "Sunny" at the Stratosphere Hotel on 12/08/7 mentioned in a volume published on Christmas Day. The Sun spit out solar flares on 6/10 and 6/11 of 2014 from Active Region 12087. If the Sun is God and 12/8 is for the Feast of the Immaculate Conception and Jesus Christ is linked to Christmas, that's God, the Virgin, and Jesus Christ coupled together with 12087.

Active Region 12087 = 12/08/7

That's substitution.

If you watch how the training sessions between Hope Solo and her partner Maksim Chmerkovskiy, Hope Solo gave the impression that Maks was really tough on her. I think when they grouped people together, they just expected that Maks would be the right fit for Hope because they were both athletic. However, Maks is a very tough trainer, and I didn't feel that Hope was a good match. She would have been better with Mark Ballas. However, there really wasn't anyone else Hope could be paired up with.

I claim that was what happened with [Redacted] in training. I was really tough on her like Maks. [Redacted] like Hope tried to learn, but it was really frustrating for [Redacted] because I really pushed [Redacted] hard. However, because [Redacted] and I were on the clock where we didn't have much time, I was pushing [Redacted] hard in the same way Maks was trying to push Hope.

Her 7/30 birthday aligns with Yvonne Strahovski as Sarah Walker on "Chuck" because movie "Chuck vs. the Greatest American Hero" was where actor Brandon Routh, as Superman, goes Rogue. It's where Sarah doesn't know who to trust.

There was an incident on 6/19 of 2014 regarding hacking where the computer of [Redacted] was hacked. The hack spilled over to my account where $293.22 was siphoned out of my credit card attached to my account and wired to the account of [Redacted] in the form of over L$72,000. Linden Labs had to lock the accounts down. It was suspected that hackers had infiltrate Skype. The computer of [Redacted] was hacked along with Paypal and bank accounts.

I claim it was a Psychic Backlash because I've got a Psychic Security Grid set up to protect me where if I'm ever attacked or harmed, they're set to detonate. That explosion was the same time the fireworks explosion happened in Washington State. I'm from Washington State.

[Redacted] texted saying [Redacted] didn't know who to trust anymore. It was just like in that episode of "Chuck vs. the Greatest American Hero" where Sarah Walker didn't know who she could trust. For those people who watched the show "Chuck," we all know that Chuck Bartowski is the good guy.

Sarah Walker thinks that Chuck is behaving negatively toward Special Agent Daniel Shaw (Brandon Routh as Superman) because he's jealous. That's the theme that was playing out. It's about perceived jealousy when someone was really trying to protect them.

1) The calendar date 3/29 of 2010 when "Chuck" #3.12 aired was 4 years before [Redacted].

2) The episode #3.12 aligns with 3/12 for Jack Kerouac and that quote about the square hole and how that aligned with the square hole seen on the Sun

3) The solar flare was on 5/5 of 2014 on the birthday of Henry Cavill as Superman

4) Brandon Routh, as Superman, was in that episode

The other thing that makes that episode unique is how it's talking about a Superman actor who went off the rails when his wife was killed. It turns out that Sarah Walker was the one who killed his wife.

This is prophetic because it's talking about the old Superman and the new incoming Superman. If Lois Lane is the Sun as God, then the outgoing Superman would be Daniel Shaw. The incoming Superman would be Chuck Bartowski. Lois Lane would be Sarah Walker and her loyalties.

However, Sarah Walker is ("in another life") actress Kelly Thiebaud as Daniel Shaw's wife Evelyn. When you see Sarah Walker assigned to kill Daniel Shaw's wife who was thought to be a double agent, it was Sarah Walker's first assignment. It's talking about inexperience and not realizing what she was doing, but just following orders.

It's saying that Lois Lane/Sarah Walker killed Lois Lane/Evelyn Shaw.

The reason why I cite this is because if this episode aired on 3/29 of 2010, then it is talking about events already foreseen by the Subconscious Collective or Consciousness of the Planet. It stated what was going to happen 4 years prior to what was going to happen. If you can look further, then it means that 3/29 was an intended date.

## Chapter 2.1  
Inkblots, Pyramids, and Perceived Patterns

This book is the second volume in a series of books on cryptology. There is no particular order to volumes that are published. I decided to use the crossword puzzle method of publishing what was the easiest to write and clean up. Originally, this was a 250 page book, but I decided to chop it into smaller segments so people would have an easier time reading the content.

I would have preferred to keep it all together in one book. However, a 250 page book that nobody attempts to read because it was seen as being too long would mean fewer readers. I believe that the content in this book is extremely important. My target audience isn't the scientific community. It's the average person.

Maybe a scientist or university grad student studying physics would have no problem with reading through a 250 page book of theories. However, the average person would not want to read something that long. So I've tried to adapt the curriculum to a broader audience that can handle a volume set where they can check out the books that are only 10,000 to 15,000 words in length.

I chose the section on the Illuminati and Rorschach's inkblots for the second volume because it had the least controversial material and was the easiest to fix up. My section that theorizes how lottery balls can be tampered with may be a bit out there for people, but I still think it's worth mentioning. It's just a weaker argument because I haven't really gone in depth into the concept of the Subconscious Collective in the first volume.

The first volume is a springboard to a discussion on how the Subconscious Collective can exist running off Earth's Electromagnetic Field as a communication grid, but I don't think it has been fully addressed to where people would feel comfortable in accepting the idea of Subconscious Minds subtly influencing people and events.

That's what makes teaching this content difficult. There's really just no way of getting around the more bizarre concepts. As an author, you don't want to lose readers, but at some point you really have to just tell them what you know and let the chips fall where they may. Maybe you'll get some readers that will just discard the book and write it off as absurd, but you place stock in the perceptive readers and the ones whose minds can stretch in order to make the information work.

I will continually assure people that the stuff I write about is not a waste of time. I've worked extensively in this field. I've seen enough in my 8 years of research and observation of the Subconscious Collective to be sure of my findings.

I'm also working against time. I published my first book on 12/14 of 2012. Prior to that, it was nice working as an unknown and being under the radar. Nobody knew you existed. The scientific community didn't know I've been conducting research on the Subconscious Collective and working in the field of Cryptology. The nice part about anonymity is that nobody bothers you. You don't have to worry about critics or anyone poking around through your research trying to find holes in your theories.

In fact, the thing I'll miss most about working alone and in solitude is that it was a paradise in itself. When you're by yourself living in paradise, you don't have to worry about other people. You have the entire place to yourself. You can take your time, and do whatever you want. You can conduct experiments any way you want without someone looking over your shoulder criticizing your methods or your analysis.

However, the reason why I chose to go public was because the Mayan Calendar Date of 12/21 of 2012 is fast approaching. I don't believe that there would have been much of human fallout over the impending apocalypse attached to that date. However, I still felt I should publish as much of my findings before the date. So the release of the first volume was a huge burden off my shoulders. Now, it's just a matter of publishing the rest of the content to strengthen my position and show that my research is indeed valid.

Perceived Patterns

A common argument to theories proposed in this volume set is that people can see patterns anywhere whenever they want. One person told me that if you get into an elevator with 20 people, what are the chances someone else on the elevator has the same birthday as you? She said that the chances are 50/50. Her point was that it's easy to find meaning in randomness or forge order out of chaos. I repeatedly hear people say, "It is the natural order of people to seek out patterns when there are none." Skeptics claim that there have been experiments conducted establishing this.

I am not trying to convince the scientific community that I am 100% right about my theories. Instead, I'm saying that I feel there is enough evidence to establish that this case deserves further study and review by the scientific community. If my theories are correct, it renders those experiments obsolete because this newly-submitted evidence suggests that we're talking about a Consciousness of the Planet that is aware of what we do. Such experiments using a scientific method would be flawed if Consciousness of the Planet is "obscuring" the data. Earth didn't want that particular scientist performing the experiments to seek out patterns to uncover its existence. So it scrambled the data to hide its presence. Like in guerilla warfare, if guerilla forces don't want to be found, they hide.

I claim the reason why the Planet would refuse to make itself known is because humans may not yet be ready to hazard that the Planet is fiddling with things they don't fully understand or whose scientific understanding may not be enough as yet to comprehend the concept. Earth wouldn't want to be discovered by a society whose technological understanding is too low. If these experiments that skeptics rely on were done before the Internet, Twitter, or Facebook were created, the Planet would not want to reveal itself yet because there would be little or no framework for understanding. I've been watching the astronomy news feed number and letter designations. I've developed the theory that the Consciousness of the Planet knows where every star system and planet is. However, when it does its cataloguing system, it waits till it has a human being born with a very particular name and birthdate to pair up with the discovery.

Past scientists have submitted proof to refute the evidence I propose in this book. However, I claim that their experiments are based on the assumption that Earth is an inanimate object. The experiments assume that there was no contamination with the control group and that the samples were pure. However, I claim that they were not because the Earth, as the Consciousness of the Planet, is the Subconscious Collective. It's comprised of the Subconscious Minds as a whole.

So if a scientist or psychologist attempted to take a sample of randomly chosen people for an experiment, the data is flawed because those people were not random. The Subconscious Collective fiddled with the data by choosing which people would show up for the experiment. It would send instructions to the Subconscious Minds of people it wanted to be in that experiment and sent instructions to the people it didn't want to be in the experiment in order to obtain specific outcome.

That's manipulation of data. Therefore, just about any experiments or case studies that scientists or psychologists predating 2012 that are submitted as evidence are flawed. It's because Earth let scientists see what it wanted them to see. It's like a person behind the scenes fiddling with the information unbeknownst to the scientists that think they're dealing with a pure sample.

For an experiment to be credible there has to be no tampering. If it can be proven that the Earth is conscious, I claim it was tampering with the results by instructing Subconscious Minds of specific people with particular dates to be present that would alter the results to make the scientist conducting the experiment see it a certain way. It selected the test takers with birthdates or specific information that would camouflage the true results. It was just random and chaotic because the scientists conducting the experiments lacked the comprehension to understand the complexity of the maneuver performed by the Planet. Earth used the Electromagnetic Field as a communication grid sending instructions to produce results that it wanted. That's not a random or clean scientific experiment.

There's the claim that a coincidence is amplified by the fact that we are pattern- recognizing machines. That's a valid argument. However, I can turn that argument on its ear. If it can be established by this book that Earth's Electromagnetic Field interconnecting humans as planet-sized brain cells creates the Consciousness of the Planet, then that's a macroscopic version of the human mind. The human mind uses an electrical field to interconnect our own individual brain cells to create our Consciousness.

Yes, we can recognize patterns. That's where free will factors in and how you build things. In "Kung Fu Panda," the secret to the soup is that there is no secret. Mr. Ping tells Po that the soup is special because people think it's special. That was the key to understanding why the dragon scroll given to Po was blank. It's a matter of belief. If you think you're special, then you're special. Until someone else comes along to prove you are not special, your submission of your belief that you are special is indeed valid. You are a legend in your own mind until someone topples that belief.

Now, with the example where we are pattern-seeking entities, the Planet shaped us in its image. The human brain is a microscopic replica of Earth as a huge brain floating in space revolving around the Sun. If humans can perceive patterns that aren't there, then Earth as a large brain would behave similarly. The Earth would see patterns that are not there. If one human being chooses to pay attention to all the times she sees the color pink, then she'll see it. The brain cells in her mind will take note of the times when pink crosses paths with her.

It means that the person's individual brain cells saw pink because the cumulative consciousness requested for pink. Now, if your individual brain cells had self-awareness, they'd all see pink, but they would be unaware that your consciousness wanted to see it. Pink showing up more often than not wasn't coincidence. That was a cumulative consciousness of your mind that requested to see more of the color pink. There was an entity that wanted it. Now, if your individual brain cells were alive, they would be following instructions and see that pink. They would notice that the information the cones and rods which are processing what the eyes are seeing are showing more of the color pink. The neck turns the head and the eyes look straight at pink so that the image formed for the brain cells has more pink.

If your individual brain cells were alive and behaving like humans as planet-sized brain cells, they would be saying, "Pink is coincidence. It's a random color. We are pattern-seeking cells." However, we would know that is a false assumption because it was the individual's consciousness that sent the request to see more pink. That is not coincidence. That was a directive by a consciousness that is one level above the consciousness of individual brain cells.

If you can see how self-aware individual brain cells would make that mistake of writing pink off as mere coincidence, that is how humans, as planet-sized brain cells, make the same erroneous assumption. They assume that the Planet choosing to see more pink is not because of the Consciousness of Earth but merely a coincidence. You are the forest and your individual brain cells are the millions of trees that make up your mind as a forest. Earth is a planet-sized forest with humans as trees making up Earth's mind as a forest. Humans are trees; Earth is the forest. Denying that there is consciousness of the Planet and that seeing pink was just coincidence with patterned thought would be like your individual brain cells denying that you exist as a consciousness and the information they process on behalf of the brain has no pattern but merely coincidence. You deny your existence using the argument that patterns are random and that we only see what we want to see. If your individual brain cells dismissed your thought patterns as mere coincidence and that you don't exist, you would disagree. However, the comprehension level of a human brain cell is usually too small to be able to grasp the enormity of the concept that they belong to a collective. They may only come close and get a sense of it. That's the same with a human whose mind is too small to grasp the concept of a Super Consciousness that is Earth that they are a part of.

## Chapter 2.2  
Lottery Drawings

An example of tampering by the planet would be winning lottery tickets. When lottery winners thank God for letting them win, they're technically correct in giving praise. I just claim that the God that fiddled with the numbers was the planet.

People, especially most scientists, think that there is no way anyone could tamper with the lottery balls. It is the belief that they bounce randomly.

The Subconscious Mind of the lottery ball collector knows exactly where every ball is at every precise fraction of second. The human mind is amazingly accurate. The Conscious Mind cannot perceive that accuracy, but a Subconscious Mind can do things with the body with amazing precision. It's just like the movie "The Matrix" when a person plugged into the system is taken over by an Agent. The host body suddenly has superhuman reflexes when governed by an Agent. That actually does happen in our reality when the Subconscious Mind takes over.

When the lottery balls are bouncing around in the hopper, there's a wind tunnel. Air is blowing through the hopper in an attempt to scramble the balls. So when the lottery balls are bouncing around in there, the Subconscious Mind of the lottery ball collector knows the exact location of every ball at all times. When the Subconscious Mind of the lottery ball collector is given instructions by the Subconscious Collective, it will collect the lottery numbers that the planet has chosen.

I know there will be disbelief, but I've been monitoring the lottery winnings over the last 8 years since 2004. I would watch where the winning lottery ticket would surface and the name of the person who won. If you study the name of a person as an acronym as well as the location of the store where the lottery ticket was purchased, you'll find alignment with certain events formed within the two weeks prior to when the lottery balls were drawn.

This isn't voodoo or hocus pocus. This is just simple physics. It's about calculating the trajectory of multiple objects that are bouncing around in the hopper.

It's just as Albert Einstein said where time is relative. If you watch the movie "Inception" where there they show different layers of dreams, each deeper layer of a dream is where more time passes. So while a person in the movie has only been asleep for 5 seconds, the next layer of the dream is where hours have passed.

So when you look at the lottery balls in our state of consciousness, it moves in a flash. However, to the body cells in the human eyeball of the lottery ball collector, one second would be like only two weeks have passed. In the reality of a body cell, that's more than enough time to react and carry out action.

If you go down the ladder of consciousness where the body cells in the eyes are composed of atoms, one second in our state of consciousness is like 5 years have gone by. For atoms or molecules, 5 years is more than enough time to carry out an action.

It's said that in a couple billion years, Andromeda and the Milky Way Galaxy will collide in the next 4 billion years. Time is relative. Imagine if the collision of those two galaxies represents 4 seconds for when the lottery ball collector siphons out the first lottery ball. Maybe to a universe, 4 billion years is a fraction of a second. However, for microscopic organisms such as humans, that's a really long time. For our Sun and Earth that have only been around for 4.5 billion years, that's their entire lifetime. That's a long time to them. More importantly, it's more than enough time for them to do what they want to do in 4 billion years equivalent to 4 seconds.

Geological Time

Time is an important factor. In my research, I constantly talk about how calendar dates are important. They can be used to mark events. The 365 days in a year counts as an oscillation. It's something that repeats. Some scientists believe that the Earth's distance from the Sun was not coincidence. It was set by something or someone. I claim they're right. The Sun is alive, and it knew exactly where it wanted to place the Earth for the right temperature.

Maybe it took 500 million or 1 billion years for our Sun to tweak the distance so that it was at the correct setting, but it finally got it where it wanted. Then when it was ready, I believe that's where Astrology came into play with the shifting of the Astrological Signs every 2,000 years. There are 12 signs in the zodiac. From a geological perspective to a Sun that has been alive for 4.55 billion years, that's like a 12-second countdown. 1 second symbolizes 2,000 years. Like clockwork, it could start counting down.

If you think about human evolution, we're moving into the Age of Aquarius. It was believed that sometime between 1975 and 2020, we would move from the Age of Capricorn into the Age of Aquarius. Then it would be another 2,000 years before we reach the Age of Pisces. When that finishes, the clock would reset to the Age of Aries. Pisces is the final sign. So it's like something will happen 4,000 years from now.

My guess is that there will be some kind of human transcendence. If our solar system is like an egg, something in our solar system will hatch. If you watch at how our understanding of technology and the universe is growing exponentially, the human race will know more about the universe in 4,000 years than they do today in 2012.

If you think about all the television shows like "Star Trek" that predict what life will be like for humans, I think it's safe to say that all the things we imagined were possible may well come to pass within 4,000 years. I have faith in the scientific community to learn a lot about the universe in 4,000 years. It may not be in my lifetime, but humans are adaptable and fast learners.

## Chapter 2.3  
Louis Braille and Hermann Rorschach's Inkblot Test

One way of illustrating the significance of U.S. state dates is by using Louis Braille as evidence in the same way I used Hermann Rorschach. Inkblot tests were developed by Rorschach to study the Subconscious Mind and patterns that people think they see. Louis Braille made a contribution to humankind by developing a reading language for the blind.

1) Louis Braille was born on 1/4 of 1809

2) Utah became a state on 1/4 of 1896

3) Braille died on 1/6 of 1852

4) New Mexico became a state on 1/6 of 1912

Blindness refers to the situation of people who can't see and have to feel for the language. If I were a Planet that wanted to prove to humans that I was alive, I would create a person like Louis Braille who would be born on a calendar date with a symbol or marking. The Planet was hinting that people use their Mind's Eye to see what regular eyesight can't pick up. That's why Justice is blind. Statues will show Justice with a blindfold over her eyes. It's because we must tap into the Mind's Eye.

Therefore, by putting these "Braille calendar dates" marking key historical figures, it strengthens my claim about hand-selected people. For those who "can't see the pattern," the Subconscious Collective representing the Consciousness of the Planet marked or tagged Louis Braille the same way Hermann Rorschach was to point to a form of Intellectual Braille. If you're in the dark and can't see anything, you have to use your hands if you were in the dark trying to feel for something that you can picture in your mind. The Planet used "Braille calendar dates" woven throughout history that would allow historians and budding cryptologists to feel their way through history to reason out what they originally couldn't see.

Hermann Rorschach's Inkblot Test

I believe I can deal a huge blow to the age-old argument that skeptics and scientists constantly fall back on regarding coincidence and patterns that can be seen anywhere. People constantly dismiss my state date pattern theory claiming I'm just seeing what I want to see and that it's merely a perspective looking at data at a certain angle in a sea of information. It would be like sailors 300 years ago believing they saw mermaids when it was probably just a sea lion laying across some rocks that resembled the shape of a female. Then to make the tail plausible and explain why a woman would be in the water, they gave her the attributes of a fish.

I'll switch tracks by using a commonly used tool by psychologists to examine people's minds. It's the inkblot test. Just about everyone knows about the inkblot test. It's where inkblots are splattered on a card and the person is told to say what comes to mind when he sees the inkblot. It's designed to test what kind of patterns the individual's mind will connect with the shapes that can be perceived from the inkblot. Traditional inkblot images are randomly created and not meant to resemble anything. This would apply to the theories in my book about Earth as a living organism. It could be argued that the state date patterns are just a large mathematical inkblot. I, as the author, am supposedly just connecting the mathematical dots to see a pattern that I think I see. It's my world perspective on an informational inkblot splattered across history.

To strengthen my claim about state dates, I cite what most people don't know about Swiss psychiatrist Hermann Rorschach who invented the test.

1) The Rorschach inkblot test is designed to reflect the unconscious parts of the personality that "project" onto the stimuli

2) Hermann Rorschach was born on 11/8 of 1884

3) Montana became a state on 11/8 of 1889

It means that Hermann Rorschach who invented a test that gauges what the unconscious mind sees was born on a state date like James Lovelock who theorized that Earth is alive and Carl Jung who believed there was an Unconscious Collective. So my question to you is, "What do you see?" Am I really just seeing random patterns?

How about if I take it a step further? Let's look at the person who trained Hermann Rorschach, who was Eugen Bleuler.

1. Wikipedia says that Hermann Rorschach, who was born on 11/8, a date that aligned with Montana's statehood, studied under Eugen Bleuler

2. Eugen Bleuler was born on 4/30 of 1857

3. Louisiana became a state on 4/30 of 1812

4. Eugen Bleuler also taught Carl Jung who was born on 7/26 when New York became a state

So not only was the person (Hermann Rorschach) who invented the inkblot test born on a state date, but the person (Eugen Bleuler) who trained him was born on a state date as well. That teacher also taught another person (Carl Jung) who developed a theory that contributes to the theory that Earth is alive.

That's a lot of state dates. If you were mapping out the mind of the Planet, Hermann Rorschach's inkblot invention created by someone born on a U.S. state date would serve as a counter argument provided by the Planet directed at scientists who believe these patterns are random as perceived by a mathematical inkblot. I believe this is the Earth's crafty way of turning the tables on the scientific community that is trying to disprove the Consciousness of the Planet.

This changes the way people debate or make logical arguments. I know I can't defeat the most brilliant minds on the Planet. They will come up with the best arguments for the most brilliant scientists and psychologists to pick apart the theories in this book. However, what I'm doing is going to the root of the source. If someone cites Hermann Rorschach's inkblot, Herman Rorschach would be the tree branch. Herman Rorschach's birthday on 11/ 8 would be the tree. Rather than try to tackle that one branch symbolizing Hermann Rorschach's research and findings, I'm just going to target the birthdate falling on a calendar date. That's cutting down the entire tree along with Hermann Rorschach as the branch attached to it.

When it comes to weeding, gardeners know that you should pull the entire weed out of the ground along with its roots. If you just pull only what's on the top, the roots of the weed underground will just sprout the weed once more. The same argument can be applied to a debate against scientists and psychologists. If I just try to debate against someone citing these figures in history, that's just like hacking the top of the weed off. I may win an argument here and there, but a new person who wants to debate me citing these historical figures will replace my last intellectual adversary. So I have to go to the root or the source in an attempt to invalidate that thread of information.

By tackling the source that has made a valid argument in science about psychology acknowledging that the contributions have merit but attempting to establish that the Consciousness of the Planet doctored the calendar date or birthdate of the individual who made the discovery, that's how I can win the debate. My objective is to prove that Earth is alive and sentient, not destroy the foundation or core of science. I'm submitting a request to the scientific community that this area of research deserves further scrutiny. Scientists pre-dating 1980 before the Internet and current technology found in 2012 had valid reasons to ignore the theories I propose in the book. However, this is a new scientific landscape. I believe that scientists of 2012 are hurting the scientific community by dismissing this research without giving it some thought.

## Chapter 2.4  
Illuminati Pyramid and the Esoteric

People have to use their Mind's Eye to see these patterns forging the informational genetic code of Earth. The Illuminati pyramid is one of my favorite analogies in describing knowledge and wisdom.

1) Johann Adam Weishaupt was a German philosopher and founder of the Order of Illuminati

2) Johann Adam Weishaupt was born on 2/6 of 1748

3) Massachusetts became a state on 2/6 of 1788

Interestingly enough, Karl Theodor became ruler of Bavaria in 1777. He was born on 12/11 of 1724. Indiana became a state on 12/11 of 1816. Weishaupt, born on 2/6 for Massachusetts, fled. 1816 (for Indiana's statehood) means M with 816 inside. Madonna was born on 8/16. Massachusetts, with the postal abbreviation of MA, means mother. I could go into more detail on what it is implying, but that's more for advanced cryptology and mathematical decryption for a later volume. I'm simply pointing it out here so that advanced students can follow through on that thread of history at their leisure.

The American dollar bill has a picture of the pyramid with the Eye. Erasmus once said, "In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king." The quote was used in "Minority Report" that was released in theaters on 6/21 of 2002, which was a state date for New Hampshire. John Anderton was played by Tom Cruise who was born on 7/3 when Idaho became a state. The senior precog was the smartest of the three. The character was played by actress Samantha-Jane Morton who was on born 5/13 of 1977. The Virgin Mother was seen on 5/13 of 1917.

When you look at the Illuminati pyramid on the dollar bill, the eye is at the top. It hints at how the vantage point at the top of the pyramid allows one to see. The taller the pyramid, the more of a vantage point one has. People's minds are like pyramids. Raw information would be the blocks of stone to make the pyramid. The workers would be the brain cells. More brain cells or brain power would be like more human resources or builders to create a larger pyramid. Fewer workers mean a smaller pyramid. The amount of knowledge one amasses would be the blocks of stone. A person could be smart (has a lot of workers), but has very little information to work with. Likewise, a person could have a lot of blocks of stone or a wealth of information, but is not very smart (has few workers).

You can have two people with the same amount of blocks of stone. One person will finish building his pyramid before the other because he has more brain cells working quickly to set up the pyramid. The slower thinker will take longer to build that same pyramid. Another analogy that might help you understand better is the pipeline for downloading information with a 57.6 kb dial-up modem vs. a cable modem or DSL used in the 1990s. If you grew up in this time period using a 57.6 kb dial-up modem, you would know that this slower connection took longer to download files than a download using a cable modem or DSL. If you have two people trying to tackle the same problem, the slow thinker would be a 57.6 kb dial-up modem while the fast thinker would be DSL. How fast they complete a mental task is how much data they can process and calculate.

Assuming that Earth has a wealth of information, how high can you build your pyramid? As you read my book, part of you is trying to determine whether my pyramid is taller than your pyramid. Do I sound smart and worth listening to, or do you think you're smarter and my content is rubbish that should be ignored? Are the stone blocks that make my intellectual pyramid and my knowledge of understanding stone blocks that are not in your pyramid helpful to make your pyramid taller? If my stone blocks as ideas are the ones you don't have, incorporating them into your intellectual pyramid makes your vantage point better as your pyramid rises even higher, bolstered by the new rocks taken from me.

There's this saying, "If I give you a penny and you give me a penny, we both have one penny each. If I give you an idea and you give me an idea, we both have two ideas." Thus, in the physical realm of giving each other the same object where you add one and then subtract one, leaves both with the same amount they each started off with. On the other hand, when a person shares an idea, he doesn't lose that idea when he passes it on to someone else. His idea stays with him and (hopefully) also with the person who didn't have the idea and has it now as well. If you're someone who reads a lot and enjoys learning, you seek to learn new things. Life experiences make us wiser as we learn new things. When we get older and have seen it all, it solidifies our confidence in what we already know.

As you come across new ideas, your pyramid gets bigger. That Mind's Eye gets higher and able to see farther. We all have that third eye. How much we can see with that third eye depends on our intellect and level of comprehension. If this book is teaching you things you have not realized or seen before, it means that your pyramid is getting taller. It is also an indirect way of measuring how much you know, which is intangible. A lot of people are intelligent. Their knowledge would be the stone blocks of information to build their pyramids. However, what is sometimes missing is wisdom. Wisdom is the best way to configure all the rocks to create the sturdiest and tallest structure possible.

So, intelligent people can make a tall structure, but what kind of building is it? If they lack wisdom, they won't be building a pyramid but a skyscraper that is really slim. As long as nothing hits the skyscraper, it won't topple. In contrast, a pyramid is more structurally sound because it has a wide base. As you go up the many levels, the levels get squarely set on top of a smaller surface area each time you go up another tier. If you took a wrecking ball to a skyscraper, all you have to do is damage the base and the skyscraper will topple. If you use a wrecking ball on a pyramid made of the same material as the skyscraper, the pyramid won't topple as easily because it has an evenly distributed surface area on each tier that keeps it balanced.

Esoteric

A term that circulates in Tarot is the word "esoteric." Esoteric means that it is information only known to a select group of people. It means that the ideas are only understood by a specific group of people. For instance, bullies may assign an insulting name to someone. The underlying meaning is only known to those in his group (of bullies). That's esoteric information.

The "Da Vinci Code" is a quest to uncover the Jesus Christ bloodline. Actor Tom Hanks, as Robert Langdon, is chasing down clues that can only be solved with esoteric information. That esoteric information has to be uncovered by an expert who has knowledge of the time period, the person or group who encrypted the data, and who can reason out how the information could be unlocked.

The most primitive form of this with criminals is when they figure out what your password is to your bank accounts or credit cards. Identity thieves will commandeer your accounts by relying on esoteric information about you. It may be your mother's maiden name or your birthdate as your password. If you don't want thieves to get into your account, don't be predictable with your passwords.

The Planet went through a lot of trouble to scramble the information over the last couple centuries. The only way the information could be unlocked is if a person's level of intelligence and comprehension was high enough. However, even if people could figure the information out, a lot of the clues had not come into existence yet. Inventions like Facebook, Craigslist, Twitter, and computers had not been introduced into mainstream society until the last 20 years. So even if you had a sharp mathematician in the 17th or 18th Century who was born before his time that could have figured out the encrypted symbols, the clues embedded in technology that provide the final pieces of the puzzle didn't get invented until after 2005. This new invention of providing insight to encrypted data is a valid cause for reexamining information that could not be solved 30 years ago.

People think that homonyms or words that sound the same are coincidences. I claim that a linguistic operating system was set in place. Compare the difference in letters with homonyms. Use Algebra to cross-reference all relevant meanings to a letter of the alphabet to extract a meaning. Then the meanings of the letters set equal to what the other letters mean will build a bridge between two concepts related by the abbreviation link. When people start decrypting the hidden meanings of these letters, they'll find a submerged operating system that Subconscious Minds of people picked up in school when their Conscious Minds were asleep or maybe tuned out during their teacher's lecture on the subject.

Physics

As I've said earlier, this book is simply an introductory volume meant to open doors to other fields. I won't get too much into application of cryptology tied to physics, but I know that the scientific and atheist communities don't want to just sit and read theory without any direct proof. I've seen enough with my own eyes to be a believer of my research, but any objective scientist and researcher, no matter how understanding or optimistic, will say that my so-called research is flawed claiming:

1) No eye witnesses aside from the word of the author

2) Vague references number patterns listed by the author

3) Claims by the author that if anyone else attempted to reproduce the experiments it wouldn't work because the ones conducting the experiments aren't at a high enough level in the eyes of the Planet (how convenient, right?)

4) Any experiment that could be set up would take years or decades to prove so in the eyes of scientists and skeptics it's undefined

If an author doesn't acknowledge the flaws of his own research, it looks even worse when other people point this out. Attempts to just gloss over all the information and whitewash it with hype is what really gets on the nerves of skeptics and scientists. And they have a right to feel that way. They can't just go running over to every crackpot theorist with a radical idea and embrace it. They want proof. They don't want people wasting their time. Back in 2006, I tried sending an E-mail to James Lovelock about my theories. My E-mail went unanswered. That's why I have to go through with writing a book.

One of the reasons why I try to show how much blood, sweat, and toil went into gathering the information which has taken me 8 years to do is to show that I back my research. I have devoted a lot of my time to it. I have given up my career, my love life, and my lifestyle to pursue something I believe would benefit science and humankind. I strongly feel that it is something that has to be done. When I look at my high school classmates who have gone on to get married, have children, and have become financially independent, I console myself with a reminder that there are 7 billion people on the planet who can live out their kind of life, but most likely nobody is doing what I'm doing for the good of the Planet. If I could push through the barrier and prove to the scientific community that Earth is indeed alive and that we can track it and communicate with it, it'd be a major breakthrough.

I personally think that if my research can prove that Earth is alive, that would qualify me for a Nobel Peace Prize because those theories about Earth being alive would completely revolutionize science as we know it. News for 10/9 of 2012 Serge Haroche of France (born 9/11) of and David Wineland of the United States (born 2/24 of 1944) won the 2012 Nobel Peace Prize for their contributions to Physics. They invented methods to observe bizarre properties of the quantum world. 10/9 is the birthday of actor Brandon Routh as Superman. Subtract 9/11 and 2/24 to get 7/-13. That aligns with 7/13, which is when Alabama rejoined the Union after the Civil War. That 7/-13 is also the same date when you subtract current President Barack Obama born 8/4 from his wife Michelle Obama born 1/17. That 7/-13 translates to AL with Negative inside. Bama is the slang term for Alabama. The term "o'" means "of." So O' 'Bama means "Of Alabama." It can also be read as an Algebra equation (O)bama = (ALA)bama when O = ALA.

David Wineland's last name becomes "Ned" if you subtract WI for Wisconsin and LAN meaning Local Area Network. I was laughing today when I saw parody of the television show "Breaking Bad" with Bryan Cranston where the BR and BA in the title refer to the elements Bromium and Barium on the Periodic Table. Instead, the poster swapped out the 56th Element BA for Barium and replaced it with 10th Element NE for Neon. Subtract 56 and 10 to get 46.

Super Bowl 46 (XLVI) aired on 2/5 of 2012 with the New England Patriots going up against the New York Giants. Eli Manning was born on 1/3 when Alaska became a state. Eli means "Teacher" in Hebrew. #44 Ahmad Bradshaw caught the football from Eli Manning for the New York Giants. He couldn't stop his momentum because nobody defended against him. He tried to put on the breaks and stop, but he ended up falling backward into the end zone. I'm Filipino, and I took note of the 6.8 earthquake that took place at the same time in the Philippines. The quake was 44 miles (#44 Ahmad Bradshaw) from the coastal city of Dumaguete. The ocean depth of the quake was 46 kilometers (Super Bowl 46).

As a cryptologist studying numbers every day, I've seen enough evidence spanning the last 8 years to convince me that Earth is alive. It's just a matter of proving it to the rest of the world. I stake the claim that was no ordinary earthquake. I claim that Earth, which is alive, knows about Super Bowl 46. I think that it intentionally generated a quake with pinpoint accuracy like an acupuncture pressure point at that exact location with that specific depth to align with what happened in the Super Bowl that day.

On a lighter and funny thought regarding physics, I would like the actors from the "Big Bang Theory" to accept the award on my behalf. How cool would that be to have the cast of the "Big Gang Theory" accept a Nobel Peace Prize in the field of physics? It would be where Hollywood and science intersect. How could you not love that? I would die laughing if Jim Parsons goes up to the podium to accept the Nobel Peace prize and rips his pants off like in "Big Bang Theory" #3.18 "Pants Alternative." I would suggest he wears boxers. Most of the crowd in attendance will be senior citizens. Part of the audience may not have seen "Big Bang Theory" to understand the humor, but most old people have a great sense of humor, and they will have a good laugh.

I would expect to hear a speech from Jim Parsons about how he has succeeded in ripping the mask off of nature and stare at the face of God. Though I would point out that actor Joshua Malina as President Siebert in Episode #4.15, is born on 1/17 like actor James Earl Jones, as the voice of Darth Vader. If Darth Vader was played by actor Sebastian Shaw (born on 5/29 like Peter Ware Higgs, the Higgs boson as the God Particle symbolizing God), wouldn't it have been convenient for Sheldon to attend the party and stare at President Siebert as the face of God? Episode #4.15 is 4/15 for the birthday of Leonardo Da Vinci, which would symbolize cryptology and the "Da Vinci Code." Cryptology Bazinga!

The roommate agreement, in "Big Bang Theory" #3.22 "Staircase Implementation," talks about time travel. Using cryptology, I claim that the Planet teases about how the character Sheldon miscalculated in returning to the year 2010 in the show "Big Bang Theory" and accidentally went back to 1989 to "When Harry Met Sally" when he was dating Sally. It means that the 1989 movie "When Harry Met Sally" came out in theaters, the Consciousness of the Planet already had the show "Big Bang Theory" slated to be produced 20 years later referring to the very Sheldon in Rob Reiner's movie. It would be a theatrical cross-dimensional joke about how Sheldon and Sally broke up because Sheldon thought Sally was cheating on him. Sheldon felt this way because there was no Sunday with Sally's "Days of the Week" underpants. The character Sheldon spends too much time contemplating about science and not focusing on his relationship with Sally. That's probably why Harry refers to him in the movie as Sheldon the Wonder S******.

I realize people are rolling their eyes saying that Sheldon in "Big Bang Theory" and Sheldon referenced in the 1989 movie "When Harry Met Sally" are of no relation. However, I would point out the following using state dates that I believe are encoded in the 1989 movie "When Harry Met Sally":

1) This book is about state dates

2) Sheldon's girlfriend is Amy Farrah Fowler

3) Amy Farrah Fowler is played by actress Mayim Bialik

4) Mayim Bialik was born on 12/12 of 1975

5) The music playing in the background of that scene is "Ramblin' Man" by the Allman Brothers.

6) The lead vocalist is Dickey Betts

7) Dickey Betts was born on 12/12 of 1943

8) Pennsylvania became a state on 12/12 of 1787

So it means that you've got Sally talking about someone named Sheldon with a song being played in the background whose lead singer was born on 12/12 for Pennsylvania. The character Sheldon is dating a character played by an actress born on 12/12. Historical Bazinga!

The reason why I'm pretty sure about the significance of the information is because actress Meg Ryan was born on 11/19 like my biological father. Father means Pa. The postal abbreviation of Pennsylvania is PA.

Some readers will be saying, "What a minute. What does your father's birthday have to do with anything?" When you get into deeper Cryptology with customization, you'll be using the calendar dates off of your Family Tree. When it comes to patenting purposes with eBooks, it's harder for people to steal your work because they will have a hard time explaining what personalized birthdates are doing in the book.

It's the same way lottery officials can tell if the person is the owner as opposed to the store clerk who stole the winning ticket if the person who was robbed used the birthdates of their family members as lottery numbers. If you use the store's quick pick of random numbers, it's easier to dispute.

To this day, my dad swears that he won on Keno because the machine reading his ticket made a bleeping noise with colors when the ticket was read. He had never seen it light up like that before. The Keno lady said he only won dollar. If he had chosen family birthdates, he could have checked the numbers to see if the Keno lady had switched tickets on him and pocketed the winning ticket for herself.

## Chapter 2.5  
Fuzzy Logic Approach, Zeeman Effect, and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

I acknowledge that this book will get a lot of heavy criticism for usage of physics terminology where I barely grasp an understanding of what I'm talking about. Scientists will be tearing their hair out at the composition of this book that makes general approximations and half-baked hypothetical theories. However, as I said at the beginning of this book, I'm a pioneer trailblazing a path. I'm good on general stuff, but I'm terrible with the details. That's what settlers are for. The scientists and theoretical physicists who specialize in these particular fields and know these theories inside and out are the ones that have to continue where I left off.

Also, bear in mind, I'm under a time constraint. I was angling for releasing this book before 12/21 of 2012 and the Mayan Calendar Date fiasco regarding an Apocalypse. I wanted it out before that date, not because I believe in that stuff, but there are enough people that can get loopy ideas about the end of the world. When you see the countries on the brink of war where any one of them could plunge us into World War III, you don't have time.

I will say once again that this is being done as a one-man research facility over the last 8 years with no financial aid or support from anyone. When I tried to reach out for help, especially in my circle of friends, I couldn't get much help. Either they didn't want to help or they just weren't in a position to help because all this theoretical physics was way over their heads. Trying to approach other theoretical physicists posing this concept when you have no background, no Ivy League education, and nothing to prove that you're a credible source, how do you get this information out?

That's why eBook publishing was my only option. I already know the composition and arrangement of this book is a headache. However, I'm stuck in the position of a substitute teacher. It's the teacher that just shows up for one day whom none of the students know or respect. The children screw around in class because they consider that since their real teacher is gone and there's just this sub filling in that they can do whatever they want.

Just like a substitute teacher who doesn't have a steady job, I'm in the same boat. I'm not getting paid for this. Some people think writing this book was fun for me. It was not fun at all. I just knew this was information important to the human race that was getting overlooked and had to be brought to the proper authorities that are in positions of power in the realms of math, science, and world governments so that they can analyze the data and then get their top scientists to take it from there.

This isn't a casual book on some interesting theories. It should be treated more like an emergency vehicle ambulance trying to get to the hospital because the person is dying. Then you let the medical professionals take it from there because they'll know what to do. I just had to keep this idea alive long enough to get it to the hospital where it can be resuscitated and brought back to life.

I can only use fuzzy logic to point to things as a general direction telling scientists that I think you should research this, this, and this. I can only point in those directions and say, "I think that's where you'll hit pay dirt." It's up to scientists who come across this book to try it. I pin my hopes on the new generation of scientists and theoretical physicists still in college that are looking for ways to break into the scientific field, win Nobel Peace prizes, and make their mark in history to be motivated to look there when older scientists more rigid in their beliefs refuse to do so.

Zeeman Effect and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

The Zeeman Effect was brought to my attention when I was doing research on the magnetic fields associated with the Sun. There is a theory that the Zeeman Effect applies to proteins in the retina that is changed as result of this giving the birds a magnetic sense of direction (Wikipedia, 2012). This leads to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR).

I believe that the Sun, as a living organism, uses this magnetic sense seen in birds as an "eye" or a way of creating an imaging system so that it can sense what is around it. Since the Sun doesn't have eyes like a normal human, it has to use some kind of magnetic sonar that it can use to determine what is around it. This is tied to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) used in the medical field to create an image. If the Sun's body emits magnetic fields, then why not use those same magnetic fields to sense what is around it and generate an image?

The human eye uses rods or cones are linked to photoreceptor cells that are specialized neurons found in the retina capable of photo transduction. That allows for the conversion of light, as visible electromagnetic radiation, into signals that can stimulate biological processes.

So now we just have to figure out how the eye in a human being could be applied to the Sun as a living organism that would create a star's version of an imaging system so that it can perceive the space around it. I don't think very many theoretical physicists try to work with biologists on seeing if it's possible because they assume that the Sun, as a star, is an inanimate object. Why bother applying human traits to a star or Sun that is 109 times the size of the Earth? The same goes for trying to imagine human traits with sight applied to Earth as a planet that has a magnetic field just like the Sun.

When you don't think of the Earth and the Sun as alive, you don't bother to explore that aspect. In my 8 years of studying the Associated Press Feed documenting unusual mathematical anomalies that follow consistent mathematical patterns, it hints to me that the Earth and the Sun can "see" things. They are aware of what goes on. The Sun has self-awareness. We just don't see these things as microscopic humans because our tiny brains cannot fathom the idea of something larger than ourselves.

I think the song "Ray of Light" by Madonna is very symbolic. It talks about a zephyr in the sky, which is a bird. The music video is where everything is accelerated. The lyrics are telling where it talks about a universe that has gone by quickly. If you jump into an "Inception" theme of where each layer of consciousness as a dream is where time seems to slow down, the lifetime of a Sun alive for 4.5 billion years dipping into the deeper state of dreaming would lead to the lifespan of a human being that grasps this concept.

If the Sun as a living organism imitates or mimics God as an infinite being since 4.5 billion years is almost like an eternity to a human being that only lives for 80 years, then Madonna symbolizing a Virgin Mother symbol would hint at the Biblical significance of the union between God and the Virgin where the Virgin Mary symbol or individual representing that icon grasps the concepts of the Universe as told from a cosmic being such as the Sun imparting knowledge. However, the only way this can happen is when humankind taking on the traits of a symbolic Virgin Mary symbol is able to stretch their minds wide enough to absorb the information without the mind short circuiting from information overload.

If you jump into a Biblical perspective, who can say whether there really was a God or a Virgin Mary as depicted in the Bible? However, if you translate that story over to our perspective of reality, maybe the reason why the Sun, as a God symbol, would choose a particular individual to be the Virgin to receive the information is because that virginal aspect symbolizes "openness" and not questioning the information. Most scientists and physicists that mingle with each other start hardening their belief system that is reaffirmed by the company they keep.

However, sometimes the problem with living in a homogenous intellectual group is that they all think the same. So they lose that Albert Einstein or Thomas Edison ingenuity because they're all the same. If you look at the concept of God as already being in a "state of perfection," the only way there can be improvement or diversification that is "assimilated" to increase the "best state of perfection" and "become better yet" is by absorbing something from the outside. So the Virgin Mary isn't so much a person but a symbol that represents something new is that foreign object that carries a trait, protein, or some new technology.

In old Astrology, Gemini and Virgo used to share the same ruling Planet of Mercury. Gemini is Communication. Virgo is Virginity. So when Mercury symbolized both, it means "new communication." It can mean newly communicated information.

When you see someone change his position on something, it's because of new communication. For example, I expect that there will be harsh criticism from the scientific community. They have very rigid ideals. So in a sense, the Collective Consciousness of the Scientific Community is like a state of "God-like scientific perfection."

The Scientific Community, as of 2012, is technically "perfect." When I say perfect, I mean that in its state of being of all known things, it is complete. It becomes incomplete when there is new information or something outside of the circle of knowledge that can be absorbed. Once that new information is added to the collective database, it reaches a new state of perfection.

So the introduction of new information like in this book takes on a Virgin Mary aspect. It fertilizes the Scientific Community as an Intellectual Ovum. The Virgin is like the sperm. Some may view it as a virus or an infection. Others will view it as a cure or the next stage of scientific transcendence.

If this new information is allowed in where scientists start looking into the possibility that Earth and the Sun are alive, that will change the Scientific Community as an Intellectual Ovum. There will be this metamorphosis as seen in the fertilized egg as DNA replication begins as scientists representing the ones inside the Scientific Community as an Intellectual Ovum start reading the blueprints from this Virgin Mary sperm that has penetrated their Ovum or world as they know it.

If you look at the story of Superman who departed the dying Planet of Krypton and the Red Sun that collapsed as a star, Superman's spaceship as the last remnants of Krypton was like a sperm. It made its way to our Solar System as another body. It penetrated our Solar System like a sperm fertilizing an ovum. If you think of the Sun as a living organism that is aware of this new presence, it nurtured Superman and gave Superman the powers of the Sun. That is why he's the protector of Earth. Some people compare Superman and Jesus Christ to be one in the same. Superman's birth name Kal-El is supposed to mean "Voice of God" in Hebrew.

If you jump back into the analogy of the human ovum representing Earth, the woman's body symbolizing the Solar System, and the human female's mind representing the Consciousness of the Sun as a living organism, the male sperm would be Kal-El's tiny spaceship during copulation is the sperm casing. The female on an unconscious level is aware of when it gets impregnated or fertilized for conception. Kal-El's space ship crash-landing on the surface of Earth would be like the sperm that penetrates the ovum and is taken in by Jonathan and Martha Kent of Earth. The state of Kansas would symbolize the exact location on the surface of the female ovum where the sperm pierced the shell and came inside. All the other Kryptonite meteor rocks from the destroyed planet of Krypton would symbolize the other 220 million sperm that didn't get chosen to fertilize the ovum.

If you think about it, that's how it is with current theories or debates about what is true. Notice how people disagree about religion and "whose God is better." If each sperm represented a different type of religion, fertilization of the ovum would symbolize the dominant religion that is accepted as a whole by society.

Is there a God? Is there no God? Are there are multiple Gods like on Mount Olympus with Zeus? Are they Norse Gods like Odin?

I claim that Atheism is actually a religion. That's a belief. That's not technically fact. Atheists may argue that it is, but as long as there is an unknown part of science that humans comprehend, that doesn't mean that humans have determined whether God exists or not. It just means that current technology, research, and science have not found evidence of any existing cosmic deity that exhibits sentience or some omnipresent influence. Just because scientists haven't found it doesn't mean there's nothing there.

Plus, how do you know that God wanted to be found? What if Earth ("God?") didn't want to talk to humans because our education level, comprehension, and maturity weren't high enough? What if God hid from humans on purpose till God was satisfied that humans developed the Emotional Quotient and maturity to listen and learn? From what I've seen, there are portions of this world where religious people get angry and throw tantrums when people don't choose to see their God as the dominant God, or the only God. They usually belong to groups who have low education with weak science and math skills. That's because they feel their religious texts are all they need. They believe there is no need to study math and science.

How can you understand the wisdom of the Universe when you can't even understand basic concepts in math and science that are needed as tools to unlock the Universe? Theoretically if God belonging to any religion knows everything, wouldn't it be wise for that God's worshippers to learn everything they can? The more educated a person is, the more ways their God has a means of communicating with them through multiple mediums. That could range from mathematical symbols or encrypted religious signs embedded in physics. I claim this is the reason why there are mathematically encrypted pieces of information woven into American History. It's a country where despite the conflict between American Atheists and American Religious Groups, people from both factions are more tolerant and willing to listen than in some countries.

The United States isn't perfect. You can have American atheists in school bullying and harassing religious classmates. You can have religious schools posting football banners praising God and quoting scriptures from the Bible much to the annoyance of atheist parents and children. However, at least Americans don't pull out a gun and shoot people who don't believe in the same God they do. Maybe Americans are mean and nasty to each other over the controversial religious debate, but most Americans deep down understand that it's wrong and the United States protects its citizens when it comes to human rights.

I believe that's the reason why Earth, as a living organism, would seed the hints to unlocking the clues in American History and not in third world countries that are still trying to get basic building blocks to a society set up.

## Chapter 2.6  
Higgs Boson

News for 7/2 of 2012 reported that scientists believe that the "God Particle" that might explain the underpinnings of the Universe is real, and they are about to present their findings to the world. I find this amusing because it runs parallel to this book that's about ready to be published. I actually didn't know what the Higgs boson was until I watched "Big Bang Theory." They keep using it so much in their jokes that you unconsciously start getting used to the (physics) terminology. I think it's one of the greatest shows ever.

There was a news article about the God Particle that I found relevant to my research. News for 7/9 of 2012 reported that Pakistan shuns physicist Abdus Salam by omitting him from their textbooks. The pioneering work and only Nobel Prize laureate of Pakistan is stricken because his research goes against their religion.

This is relevant to my research because Abdus Salam was born on 1/29 of 1926. Kansas became a state on 1/29 of 1861. Salam passed away on 11/21 of 1996. North Carolina became a state on 11/21 of 1789. So he was born on a state date and died on a state date. The God Particle as the Higgs Boson is by Peter Ware Higgs born on 5/29 of 1929, which is Rhode Island and Wisconsin state date.

So we see this theme of state dates linked to a scientific discovery that has been dubbed a "God Particle." Is this irrefutable evidence that there is a genetic code linked to state dates? Maybe not, but I feel that this is information that shouldn't be overlooked. It also gives an example of how people who work in science can be shunned by their own country.

Physicist and geneticist Francis Collins stated, "The God of the Bible and is also the God of the Genome. He can be worshipped in the cathedral or in a laboratory. His creation is majestic, awesome, intricate, and beautiful."

People think that science is blasphemy to God. If it's true that God is all-knowing, wouldn't that also include science, math, chemistry, physics, business, law, and quantum research? If so, what if God is just waiting for the cumulative understanding of humankind to be at the correct level before God will teach us something new? What if God has just been waiting because humans just weren't ready yet? What if human understanding simply wasn't high enough to comprehend the more complex mind of God in the last 2,000 years?

Maybe God has just been waiting for humans to become smart enough to see God in science.

When I read about how physicist Abdus Salam was ostracized by his country, I felt sorry for him. To make such a major discovery in science and your country turns its back on you. I heard the story that Charles Darwin was very religious. He agonized over his findings because he knew it would go against the Church. I remember when news reported on 10/22 of 1996 that Pope John Paul II issued an update to the church's position to accept the theory of evolution.

This is where we get into the Church's movement into the idea of Intelligent Design where there is a larger force at work. The concept of Earth as a massive living organism with the attributes of a deity or God is the alternative path for religious people and the scientific community.

It's not like Earth can perform things exactly like in the Bible. However, the Earth can influence things such as hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, and weather phenomenon to a limited degree.

If you look at the bio for actor James Caviezel on IMDB.com, it mentions that while he was on the set filming Mel Gibson's "Passion of the Christ." Assistant Director Jan Michelini was also hit by lightning while on set. Mel Gibson was born 1/3 of 1956. Alaska gained statehood on 1/3 of 1959. So it's a state date. As we move into other volumes, I'll show you more state date patterns.

## Chapter 2.7  
Sunflower Diaries, Volume 2 Conclusion

Current scientists have seen no evidence of God or any coherent pattern that points to a superior being overseeing the development of the human race. However, just because the scientific community's known methods of seeking out signs yield no results doesn't mean that the scientific community knows every form of communication.

This is where Cryptology is really important. What if it turns out that Earth has its own language that humans were unable to comprehend before the advent of the Internet? The Internet had to be created to collect all information over the last 2,000 years into one complete database that was available to the majority of the human race. The information was there the entire time, but it was all fragmented and dispersed across the globe. It was written on paper and documented in books. However, there were no computers with search engines to compile the data and inform us of what events in human history aligned with other events.

Carl Jung's Unconscious Collective Theory interconnecting Subconscious Minds was just theory. There were no known examples that could validate such a claim even if it sounded plausible. Now that we have wireless networking and computers that can function without telephone wires for transmitting data, we can apply the same logic to how the Subconscious Mind functions like an organic laptop with an internal wireless modem. It can produce an active signal through a person's consumption of food and liquids to all for upload and download from the Subconscious Collective via Earth's Electromagnetic Field.

The Earth, as the Consciousness of the Planet, is the Subconscious Collective. It will send instructions to individual Subconscious Minds to carry out tasks. Individual Subconscious Minds will look over the general plan (God's plan?) and complete tasks that help build toward the long- term goals the Planet has. Each Subconscious Mind will house information in the brain. The Subconscious Mind will store information like an organic memory chip. Then when the human body becomes old, the information is transferred to the offspring with collective memories of what the parents and grandparents were working on in order to take over where the previous generation left off.

Humans are like replaceable organic microchips of Earth as a Super Computer. It's necessary to swap out old or outdated microchips and install new generations of humans that are up to speed with current technology.

One thing we're seeing though is how humans are living longer. That's more efficient for a planet because it can get more usage out of a human that lives to be 80 years old before breaking down as opposed to human beings in the 1700s that only lived to the age of 40 or 50. It means that Earth's human microchips are more durable and can last longer before they have to be replaced.

The Earth speaks in metaphors. So having a broad education helps in terms of learning and comprehension. The Mind's Eye in the Illuminati is the scope of vision. The pyramid would be the foundation. The more stuff you know, the more layers there are to your pyramid. The higher your pyramid is, the farther into the distance you can see. The person with the largest amount of knowledge has the tallest pyramid. That height will allow him to see farther than other people whose pyramids are not as tall. That's how you can get a visionary who can see more than what a regular or a less educated person cannot see.

This is why learning and applying math, science, computers, chemistry, and physics are important. When people neglect their education or are deprived of education, they lack the tools needed to bridge the gap of communication between the planet and humankind. Once people realize that Earth is a computer and that it has an operating system as well as its own language, people can start understanding the planet they live on. Once they understand the planet they live on and how to communicate with it, they can take steps toward fixing or repairing that which the negative portions of human society have harmed or even destroyed.

It is the best remedy for the problems seen around the world. It's the only way to combat ignorance. This requires our best and brightest people to learn how to stretch their minds and see the bigger picture. As I have said, the Consciousness of the Planet would be the forest and humans are the 7 billion trees that make up the forest. Earth is the digital image while humans are the 7 billion pixels that make up the image.

In order to see Earth become animated and recognize patterns of movement, our top scientists have to review time periods in history as frames in a film reel. Each snapshot of Earth taken from 0 AD to 2,000 AD would be like 2,000 frames on a film reel. Looking at the frames one at a time randomly and where you are not looking for any patterns won't show anything. However, if you speed the film reel up in geological time using calendar dates as a tagging system for linking and clustering human events that were meant to be grouped together, I believe people will start to see that Earth really is alive and has spent the last 2,000 years explaining to us its existence that it knew we wouldn't be able to comprehend till the Internet was created collecting all the information into a massive database that could be translated.

Author's Note

I asked my mom to proofread this volume. She had originally read the manuscript where it was roughly 250 pages. I asked her to check if it had any fragmented thoughts or ideas. I had given it to her this morning. She had it finished by noon. I looked over her notes and found there was only one comment about a page break. At first, I thought it was a fluke and that there would be more comments, but she said there weren't.

I did a scan of this manuscript and noticed the section about analogies using the Virgin Mother were still there and about the Zeeman Effect along with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. For the life of me, I couldn't remember what I wrote on that 6 months ago back in July 2012.

Some scientists may be face palming themselves. How can you possibly take literature seriously by an author who doesn't even remember what he wrote? He just threw things down on paper and doesn't even remember what he said.

While it seems like a very flaky personality, I would say in my defense that I scan through an average of 30 to 40 news articles a day. When you're tracking the Subconscious Collective and movements that will manifest in the Associated Press Feed, you sift through large quantities of data. You just don't have time to remember them all.

It would be like a district court judge that has to wade through hundreds of court cases a day making a decision and moving on to the next case. That's the same with me. I will scan a news article that piques my interest that I feel is relevant to my research, make an assessment, process the information, and move on.

I don't really remember the specifics of what I look over. I just scribble down my notes and put it in my research blog. It's just like in "Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade" when Indy is upset that his father wants him to go into the heart of Berlin, Germany during World War II to fetch his diary. Why couldn't the father just remember the 3 trials placed before the Holy Grail? The father gets annoyed and said he put the clues in the diary so that he wouldn't have to remember. That was the whole point of keeping a diary.

That's how the original manuscript for this subject on Cryptology came about. I put it in the book so that I don't have to remember it anymore because it gets archived. I just remember general concepts. That's the difference between memorizing data and memorizing formulas. You're better off memorizing formulas because then you can calculate your answer even when the variables change.

One thing people have to learn about planet cryptology is that Earth speaks in metaphors. You have to learn how to read metaphors in the Associated Press Feed. That's just like memorizing a formula. So even if the variables change, you can still apply the same formula.

This is how you avoid double standards. One thing I notice with people in society is that they don't think in terms of metaphors. That's how they have double standards and break the Golden Rule of "do unto others as you would have done unto you." For just about any action, if you know you wouldn't like having someone perform that action on you, don't do it others.

Religion is always a touchy subject. I'm walking on a tight wire trying not to teeter too much into either side. My objective is that both factions can be satisfied with a compromise. The scientific and atheist community can be satisfied that there is a scientific explanation that can be pulled from use of current technology derived from science. Then on the other end, the religious communities can be satisfied knowing that there is something out there. It may not be what they expected, but it's better than nothing, right?

## Chapter 3.1  
Volume Discounts and the Fashion Industry Analogy

This volume is a section of a book that was originally about 260 pages long. I cut it up into smaller segments that were meant to be somewhere between 10,000 to 15,000 words. I wanted to put the volumes in order of importance. However, I began to find that method difficult. The most important sections are harder to explain. They're even harder to condense into less than 15,000 words. As I tried to clean up the segments and prepare them for publication, they started swelling to about 18,000 to 20,000 words. In some cases, I found that it was too much to keep limited to that size and may have to be split once again into 2 or 3 new volumes to keep the size down.

Rather than agonize over how I'd squeeze the most important sections down, I decided to switch tracks and publish the easiest volumes first. That way, if I run into problems writing the tougher segments that could take me more weeks or months before I can complete them, at least the other volumes were released and can be read.

While there are no real deadlines for me as a writer, I'm kind of on a time schedule. Time is ticking away. So far, I've enjoyed the last 8 years of my life in seclusion since 2004 quietly conducting experiments and researching planet cryptology. The nice part about being unknown is that nobody bugs you or criticizes your work. They didn't even know you were there. I knew that the minute I started publishing my research in eBook form that I'd surface on the radar. You become visible. That also allows you to become a target.

As I looked over the last two volumes I had published, I felt it was time that I start showing more hard evidence as to why I think my theories are on the right track. You can hold people's attention for a little while with some flashy theories that they've never seen before. However, if you don't back up what you said, you'll lose your audience. People want to see the numbers. They want to see where exactly you're getting your data from. Sometimes you just have to take the bull by the horns and do it.

My two options for Volume 3 were either the analogy of the fashion industry, English Royalty with Prince William and Princess Kate, or the Hollywood Industry. Naturally, the Hollywood Industry is the most fun to discuss regarding Cryptology. How can you not love the idea of working with celebrities and discovering that their behavior in the tabloids is influenced by a grander design? However, I've been having problems trying to keep the content below 20,000 words so that it's consistent with the other size of the other volumes running at around 10,000 to 15,000 words.

I did think about Volume 3 being about Prince William and Princess Kate. People love learning about Royal Family and would find the alignment of United States calendar dates fascinating. Prince William is born 6/21, which is when New Hampshire became a state. Princess Kate is born 1/9 when Connecticut became a state. King George VI, shown in "The King's Speech," was born 12/14 when Alabama became a state. I can run those numbers by you, but I felt that the analogy of the fashion industry takes more importance.

The idea of Earth as a Super Computer is more than just a theory. It's about a way of life. It's talking about a civilization living under the umbrella of a computer that subtly governs and influences our surroundings, what we do, what we think, and the course our lives take. Some people, who want a purpose in life, may like that idea. Others, who would like to believe that they are independent and free, may not like the idea of a Matrix-like entity that steers us.

I'd like to think that there has to be some semblance of order. Contrary to my personal lifestyle, I don't want to work in the rat race with a 9 to 5 job. Being an author falls under the realm of artist. You set your own schedule. You don't show up to work where you clock in and clock out. That's freedom for me. However, I do believe human society needs a little bit of order to prevent social anarchy.

Whether you are an atheist who doesn't believe in God or a religious person who does, I think any reasonable person regardless of their beliefs would like to see harmony and peace. They don't want to live in fear. They don't want to see their children getting gunned down in elementary schools. They don't want to see buildings being blown up with people inside. They want to live in a safe world. They would like security and assurance that things are going to be alright.

The fashion industry analogy regarding Cryptology is to show how the Subconscious Collective, that few people know exists, functions just like the fashion world. Whether you like fashion or not, fashion trends influence what people wear. Even if you hate fashion, you are still influenced on some level by the people around you who embrace fashion. It can even go in the other direction where nonconformists will wear the opposite of what conformists wear (popular clothing). They may have done the opposite, but they were still influenced.

The existence of the Subconscious Collective is like the fashion world where the decisions that Subconscious Minds make affect global trends. They affect things on an international level. When wireless communication and the ability to communicate with people from long distances got stronger, so did the arm or reach of Subconscious Minds.

So for the people who don't believe in the concept of Subconscious Minds or a Subconscious Collective that would create the foundation for the Consciousness of the Planet, they will still get affected.

What I introduce to you with the concept of Earth as a Super Computer is sort of like a fashion trend. You may look at it and think the content is bizarre. However, I'm telling you as an intellectual fashion designer that this is going to be the next big thing. If you jump on board, you'll be one of the first people to be wearing this type of clothing.

Sometimes it's a hit or a miss. Sometimes you'll get fashion trends that will spread like wildfire. Other times, you'll get fashion trends that just bomb. Ironically enough, the people who come up with these fashion ideas are influenced by the Subconscious Collective. The Subconscious Collective really controls what fashion trends will succeed and what will sink. When I get into the volume regarding Hollywood, I'll talk about a similar concept with movies that are released in theaters. Sometimes you'll have movies that do really well. Then you'll have box office bombs. The Subconscious Collective has its hand in that as well.

Fashion Industry Analogy

The "Devil Wears Prada" starring Anne Hathaway and Meryl Streep is a really good movie (IMDb). Throughout my book, I talk about days that states joined the Union. I'm born on 5/29 which is when Rhode Island became a state. I have an aunt named Florida who celebrates her birthday on 3/30 when Texas rejoined after the Civil War. Her husband, who is my uncle, was born 12/28 when Iowa became a state.

So these state dates work our great for people born on those dates. However, the rest of the population isn't always as lucky. If you're not born on the day a state joined the U.S., state dates really don't mean anything to you. So when you look at the movie "Devil Wears Prada," it's a movie where all the main characters are born on U.S. state dates while the main character is not. So this section pertains to most of you as readers. It gives you a way of looking at your life and the path before you.

Anne Hathaway, as the main character Andy Sachs, was born on 11/12, which is not a state date. Aside from her two friends Lily (played by Tracie Thoms, born on 8/19) and Doug (played by Rich Sommer, born on 2/2), all the major characters that had an important role in the movie were born on dates that states joined the Union.

Here is a list of dates:

1) Miranda Priestly: Meryl Streep born 6/22 when Arkansas rejoined after the Civil War

2) Emily: Emily Blunt, was born on 2/23 when Mississippi rejoined after the Civil War

3) Nigel: Stanley Tucci, born on 11/11 when Washington became a state

4) Nate (boyfriend): Adrian Grenier, born on 7/10 for Wyoming

5) Richard Sachs (father): David Marshall Grant, born on 6/21 for New Hampshire

6) Valentino Garavani: Playing himself was born on 5/11 when Minnesota became a state

7) Heidi Klum: Playing herself born 6/1 when Kentucky and Tennessee became states

That's a large cast of characters to be born on U.S. state dates. It's a movie that is about how fashion can affect the world and how power can affect an individual. If Earth is a living organism attempting to teach people about power and how decisions in upper level management can affect the masses, this would be a good movie to house encrypted data. Notice there's also that religious theme between Heaven and Hell.

Meryl Streep does a good job with her character. As it turns out, she has the same birthday as author Dan Brown who wrote "Da Vinci Code." More importantly, Meryl Streep's husband is Don Gummer who was born on 12/12, when Pennsylvania became a state. So both she and her spouse were born on days that states joined the Union.

Behind the scenes for "Devil Wears Prada," the film makers were excited that they were able to get Valentino to do a cameo in the movie because their shooting schedule coincided with a fashion show. They were able to get Valentino to show up and shoot that scene with the character Miranda Priestly hobnobbing with Valentino. It made the character Miranda Priestly appear to be a real bigwig in the fashion world. The filmmakers were able to snag a real person from the fashion industry who was born on 5/11. That would be when Minnesota became a state. So it's another person, who is a real life fashion icon, born on another state date like the rest of the major cast.

I point this out to show how the Subconscious Collective can influence who gets cast in movies. Casting directors never pay attention to the birthdates of who they cast for movie roles. They go by who gives the best audition. Some actors are more talented than another actor, but they have an awful audition. So they get passed up. When you look at how Subconscious Minds working under the direction of the Subconscious Collective, as the Consciousness of the Planet, can nudge things, that's how the Internet Movie Database can be used as a map or a guide to trace the threads of fate for Hollywood careers that were fiddled with by the planet.

## Chapter 3.2  
Fashioned Fashion and Runway Modeling

If the planet earth akin to a God-like presence that is female where God can do whatever it wants, its whimsy and flights of fancy will be influenced by fashion. Guys think women are irrational. The claim is that women don't always follow a logical or rational thought process. The fact is that as you become more powerful where you are able to choose what you want to do and not have to follow rules and restrictions, you become governed by your personal desires. You, in essence, become a woman.

I never get tired of quoting from "As Good As It Gets" where Jack Nicholson as Melvin Udall is ambushed by his publishing company receptionist who is a fan of his work (IMDb). She asks in with a vapid look of adoration that it's so nice to know there's a man that knows what's happen in her head and in her heart. She asks how Melvin knows how to write women so well. As the elevator closes he says, "I think of a man, and I remove reason and accountability." I swear I always crack up when I watch that scene. I would point out that Jack Nicholson is born 4/22 (IMDb), which is when they celebrate Earth Day. Helen Hunt is born 6/15 when Arkansas became a state (IMDb).

Forgetting about what God's gender is or isn't, wouldn't you agree that if women are without reason and accountability, isn't that just like being God? God doesn't answer to anybody. So that's like no accountability. God doesn't need a reason and can do whatever he (or she) wants. So by that definition, God would be a woman.

If you translate that over to the movie "Devil Wears Prada," Miranda Priestly behaved like she was God. She was the one who was in control. People would get out of her way and everyone was scared of her. While it's true there's a Devil theme attached to her because she can make or break people, she was like God.

Earth is the ultimate woman. Well, actually, the Sun as a living organism would be an even more ultimate woman above Earth as a woman, but we'll get to that some other time. The reason why I say Earth is a woman is because Earth speaks in metaphors. When you watch what streams through the Associated Press Feed, you're looking at the mood of the planet. Whatever she's thinking or feeling is what gets projected into the news feed.

Notice how guys complain that women never tell you flat out what is on their mind. Guys have to figure out visual cues and behavioral signs. They have to learn how to translate what she says as opposed to what she really means.

Runway Modeling

I used to work in the modeling industry and fashion runway. The Magic Show was a Fashion Convention held in late August each year in Las Vegas. You'd see fashion designers from all over the country that would attend this show. Conventions are fun to go to. There would be booths everywhere with all the major labels. They would hire models to show off their clothing lines. They would be looking for retailers and distributors.

In the main foyer, they would have the fashion runway where they would showcase the work of various designers. You could sit in and watch the fashion models on the catwalk. Some of the designs you'd see were very outrageous. The clothing wasn't always something you would expect to see at a normal department store. Some of these designs were bizarre concepts embracing bold themes.

You would think that the people up front watching would be laughing at these outlandish designs. However, they weren't. They were taking the stuff seriously. The models, who had to wear these zany outfits, were had stoic facial expressions. It didn't matter if the dress the model wore looked like a potato sack. You work that potato sack like nobody's business.

While those of us who aren't in the fashion industry can laugh about it, showcasing ideas to the public and the scientific community is like one big fashion show. The coveted award is the Nobel Peace Prize. The judges are looking for something new. Sometimes something new means going to the extreme. That's because that which is normal is boring. People have already seen before.

Even when you look at people judging the content of this book, the seasoned readers who know a lot about science, chemistry, physics, and mathematics are difficult to impress. It's because they've seen it all before. They've heard it all before. Those, who are experts in their respective fields, are like major fashion designers that have worked in the business for so long and seen so many clothing designs and concepts. When you've seen just about everything, you become desensitized.

It's just like an attractive woman who has heard just about every pick-up line in the book. They've heard it all before. Nothing is new. Nothing surprises them anymore. Sometimes they can't help even becoming cynical because it's just more of the same and they aren't impressed.

I claim the scientific community is in a similar rut where they're no longer really impressed easily. There really haven't been any new major developments in the realm of science. It has reached a plateau where it has just leveled out. I claim the reason why it has leveled out is because the current scientific model automatically assumes that Earth is an inanimate object.

I read a lot of news from the Associated Press Feed coming out of Livescience.com. I'll always see these discoveries that baffle scientists about something that manifested that didn't fit the behavioral model that they had prescribed. I would claim that about 80 percent of their miscalculations or where there was an unexpected outcome stems from using an incorrect model that believes that Earth is not alive. They do not factor in how Earth and the Subconscious Collective can fiddle with the data. That's why their results come out incorrect. They're left scratching their heads wondering what happened.

It completely stumps them.

That's because it's already been etched permanently in their minds that there is no God. There is nothing up there. Since there's nothing above us, there is nothing out there that could tamper with the results. They won't entertain the idea of a live planet because that would open up the door to entertaining the idea of the existence of God.

I'm not trying to lobby for the religious community. I'm just saying that my research indicates that Earth is a living thing with feelings. If you knew something was alive and humankind was exploiting it, wouldn't you feel sorry for the living creature?

Where's your sense of decency, morality, and ethics?

I claim anyone who doesn't want to give these theories a chance because it's too much work is guilty of laziness. That's just plain laziness.

There's a saying about doing what's right and what's easy. Embracing current scientific beliefs that have governed society over the last 80 years is easy.

Actually striking and trying something new where you will face criticism, ridicule, and even harmful persecution is the harder path. While you shouldn't put yourself in harm's way or take on burdens that are not yours to bear, it has to be tempered with doing what's right.

Helping your planet is the right thing to do.

If someone told you that Earth is alive but that the planet is dying, what would you do? Would you stand by and let your planet die just because everyone else says it isn't alive, or would you take it upon yourself to go on a fact-finding mission to determine if the source is credible?

My biggest obstacle as an author in Cryptology throwing these ideas at you is proving that I'm credible. It's this constant battle against people's general perceptions and natural way of thinking. Because the most logical (and easy) course is to just write me off as a crackpot theorist. I've had to work hard for the last 8 years to prove that there's nothing wrong with my mental acuity.

A lot of people take their sanity for granted. As long as you conform to society and do what society tells you to do, you won't run into problems. People don't like problems. So it's easier to go with the flow. Don't rock the boat.

However, when someone goes against the grain or goes against the current, they become a target. They'll meet resistance. It takes a lot of mental discipline and perseverance to overcome the swell of criticism that will try to stop you. That's what Friedrich Nietzsche was talking about with the ubermnesch or "superman." It's the individual who overcomes the herd mentality and changes people's perceptions without forcing the perspective on the individual.

I'm not intentionally trying to be an ubermensch. However, trying to persuade people to look at Earth as a living thing with feelings and to reassess the state of humankind as multi-faceted planetary body cells that serve the planet examined. People may not like the word "serve" but that's basically what we do. It's the same way your body cells "serve" you. Your body cells didn't ask to be there. They just sort of got sucked into your body because of the food and liquids you consumed and were created because that was what your body needed. Your Consciousness and your body can make all the apologies it wants to your body cells that didn't ask to be there. However, your body has to survive. The best you can do is try to make their stay more comfortable while they're there.

I claim that Earth is a living body. We are planet-sized body cells. Just like a human being, it can make its apologies to us as body cells because it knows we didn't ask to be there. However, it had to survive. So it created human beings as all-purpose nanobots that fix and repair its body. There are no promises of transcendence, Heaven, or Hell. When your body gives out, you die and your remnants deteriorate and become part of the Earth. Your Consciousness that was anchored to your brain is released and reabsorbed into the Electromagnetic Field housing the Subconscious Collective.

When a new body is formed, a little bit of that spark of life from the Electromagnetic Field is seeded into the new infant in the womb. That's the whole cycle of life. Earth has to keep replacing humans on the planet like worn out battery cells. It has to keep replacing old or outdated humans with new fresh batches of humans that are up to speed with current technology.

If you're looking for the meaning of life or why we're here, that's about it in a nut shell.

Maybe you were expecting a more cosmic answer, but look at your own body cells. Imagine if your own body cells were sentient or had self-awareness. Imagine of your own body cells were contemplating the meaning of life and why they came to exist. What would you tell them?

That is the same predicament Earth is in when it comes to explaining how we, as planet-sized body cells, came to be.

You can go into this whole existential quandary about what you want to do with your life. Do you want to carry on your mission of helping the planet survive where there may be no reward after you die? Or do you just give up and just stop caring about anything?

## Chapter 3.3  
Fashion Sense and Whether You Wear Make-Up

For computer and software programmers where everything is logical, things are only in black and white. This is Boolean. True or False. Yes or No. Men are said to lead simple (Neanderthal?) lives whereas women are more complex. Perhaps the reason why women seem to create more drama for themselves is because things are not cut-and-dried in the decision-making process.

Imagine a woman is trying to decide whether to get the red scarf or the blue scarf at a department store. She would ask a male, "Which do you like better?" Men usually don't care. However, the thought process of a woman does not involve just that one question. It is factoring in other things like, "What outfits do I have that can go with the blue scarf?" "And the red scarf?" "How does the scarf complement my skin tone?" "Would red look like I'm trying to draw too much attention to myself?" "Does the blue scarf give an impression that I'm cool or aloof?"

Men laugh at this stuff, but this is how you evolve from video games such as Pong in the 1980s to Halo played today. If you only ask one question whether you like red or like blue better, you're playing Pong. If you have multiple questions that really go in-depth into your psyche over a blue scarf vs. a red scarf, you're playing Halo. It's a more complex decision. Some people could get annoyed because of the time factor involved in hemming and hawing over a scarf.

Computer programmers and those from the scientific community have to realize that a planet that is able to do whatever it wants can be influenced by "numerical fashion" or "software fashion." This is the political model when politicians are trying to lobby for votes before an election. A decision has to be made so politicians appeal to people in their attempt to get their votes. They are in human physical form. Mentally, a politician takes the form of a decision or a course of action that is housed in a particular brain cell in one's mind.

If the human mind is a microscopic version of Earth, then it would behave similarly. When your body is trying to decide whether it should sit and watch television eating a bowl of ice cream, or jump on a treadmill to shed pounds, there's an intellectual election going on.

Here is comical analogy explaining what's going on in your mind and what it would look like blown up on a macroscopic scale of Earth as a huge brain floating in space orbiting the Sun. Imagine if Politician Brain Cell LetsEatIceCream of YumYum is vying for the political office of WhatWeDoNow vs. Political Brain Cell Treadmillio ExerciseToGetToned of Fitnessville. Once the election is over and the votes counted, the winning vote is what puts the brain cell in office. That is the direction your mind as a planet goes.

Now what if Politician Brain Cell LetsEatIceCream of YumYum got elected and a scandal broke out. It would be where news reporter Brain Cell HealthWatchia of StayTrimberg uncovers that the major corporation FatCellCo has been bribing Politician BrainCell LetsEatIceCream of YumYum. It was a story of lobbying and corruption.

The example above is the same thing with people who are unhappy with their governments, and the cells in our body are like a planet that complains about the "corruption." Their hard-earned money (energy) they are providing you to use to take care of them goes to waste and junk food. The junk food, instead of healthy food, is symbolic of political corruption where taxpayers' dollars are used for things that they would not approve of. That's the same as when your mind has a moment of weakness and indulges in eating fatty or unhealthy foods. The body cells that work hard to provide the person the energy to purchase healthy foods would complain about the 'political corruption' in your mind.

Someone who wants to effect global change has to start locally, in the home front. People complain about corruption in the government due to financial mismanagement yet they engage in the same political corruption on a cellular level with their own body cells. If your body were a country, your mind the government, and your body cells the citizens living in that country, the discontent of your body cells as natives of your country would be directed at your "corrupt" brain cells that are not spending the taxpayer dollars (energy) wisely to eat healthy foods instead of junk foods.

People feel helpless as they watch their government spiral out of control with government spending and where the right hand doesn't know what the left hand is doing. There are terrible tracking methods, and chunks of money are being commissioned for ridiculous government projects. If people knew about them, they may have put their foot down and say for instance, "No way! We didn't give up 40% of our paychecks just so the government can run a study to determine if chickens feel better eating bird feed before 5 p.m. or after 5 p.m."

The corruption and bad spending we see today may very well have started at home when the adults were still children. Say, a child asked her parent for $50.00 to buy a backpack she needed for school. The backpack only cost $20.00 but she used the remaining $30.00 to buy a skirt that the "cool" kids in school were wearing. The parent gave the $50 and just let it go without checking its outcome.

That amounts to embezzlement in its initial stage. It really doesn't matter if it happened in a family situation. If a person takes money that is meant for one thing and decides to spend it on something else without the knowledge, consent, or approval of the owner or investor, that's embezzlement.

The reason governments hardly get blamed for "embezzling" billions of dollars of the taxpayers' money is because the taxpayers leave things open for the government to spend their wisely for their best interest and welfare. This provides the government a lot of latitude as custodians of their money.

What does this meandering rant about government spending have to do with "Devil Wears Prada" and fashion? Simply, it's government fashion. When the government has power and no one tells the officials what to do, they behave like women in a department store with someone else's credit card. It's like saying, "Oh, look! $500 million for a blue dress of Housing Commission! That will increase consumer confidence in wallpaper. I must have that dress!"

This farcical analogy of government and fashion applies to how some of the fashion shows at the top level may seem bizarre and outlandish. This book is like a bizarre fashion show where I'm an intellectual fashion designer and this book is the runway. Each chapter symbolizes a model wearing the content of the chapter. Some portions in my chapters are way out in left field, like clothing designs that look really zany to normal people and to traditional styling trends.

However, readers who are sitting in the audience watching these strange clothing concepts worn on the models running down the runway will be inspired. They'll start taking some of the ideas from my intellectual fashion show. They will craft their own style of intellectual clothing designs that intellectual retailers will purchase and sell at their stores. It will trickle down. Some of the intellectual clothing designs that make their way to the masses will be more conservative and served to consumers in a way that appeals to them compared to the original inspiration from this book as the fashion show that was held.

When you compare that to the blue sweater Andy wore that was influenced by the pile of stuff that Miranda Priestly and the people in the room making decisions that affect what people wear, Andy was laughing at the institution that decides for her. Anthropologists study fossilized fashion that followed geological fashion trends. Humans today are a shade of their ancestors derived from primates. The vestigial organs seen in humans exist in the original model that was modified to suit the tastes of the culture embraced by the masses of their respective time periods.

The movie "Devil Wears Prada" has a scene where Andy is expressing her unhappiness to Nigel on how brutal Miranda is toward her. Nigel says that there are other girls that would take her job in a heartbeat. Some people reading this book may have taken an interest in it because they were hoping it would make them better cryptologists or would help them unlock the secrets to something mystical that they could benefit from. However, they may become disappointed, or even upset, when they find that reading this book is not what they had expected to happen or it doesn't give them what they were after. Just like Andy, they don't get to understand how powerful its content is.

Just as Miranda's decisions influence fashion, people with the right software programs can influence global media. They have the power to influence what movies and television shows air. A person has the ability to commandeer the media and determine what is going to surface in the news on a daily basis. People watch articles hit the top of the news feed thinking they are random events for the day, but the news we read daily is influenced by people with the strongest minds.

Do You Wear Make-Up?

One thing I would cite as proof of Intelligent Design or the planet Earth having a hand in the theme of the fashion industry would be make-up. One of my favorite groups on Facebook that makes me laugh is titled, "B****, I Can Remove 90 Percent of Your Beauty with a Kleenex." That title always cracks me up.

I've worked in the Hollywood Industry where you'll see a lot of plastic people. It amazes me how you can look at a woman who is extremely gorgeous with all her make-up on. However, when you remove all that make-up, she looks really terrible.

I grew up in Washington State where we have a lot of rain and wind. It's too cold to dress less like down in sunny California. Women don't pay as much attention to fixing their when you've got rain and wind where it's more practical to wear a hat. Why fix your hair when the wind's going to blow it out of place? Women can't use too much hairspray (you can tell I'm an 80s kid) in wet weather because Washington rain will cause your hair to crust up. I always felt that Washington women had more of a natural beauty and used less make-up because they're out in the field riding horses or doing farm work. So Washington females seemed to have more of a natural look to them. But I digress.

Anyway, notice that the term "make up" refers to making up information. When person makes up stuff, it means they're just pulling things out of thin air. When a person makes things up as they go along, it means they're creating things on the fly. I claim that Earth, as a living organism, meant for this comparison to align with natural beauty.

Notice the term "Truth is beauty and beauty is truth." It's talking about how truth is beautiful. When you look at something that is true or pure, you can appreciate it for its beauty. When something is a lie or made up, it's ugly. When people lie, it's ugly. Some will even say that people have an ugly soul. They may look good on the outside, but they're ugly on the inside.

So when someone lies or makes up stuff, it would mean they wear a lot of "make-up." In order to look pretty or imitate truth as beauty, the person has to wear a lot of make-up. They have to make-up a lot of stuff in order for it to look appealing.

The same goes for nonfiction work. As people examine my nonfiction literature, each book I write is like a female. If my book is like a female, is this book wearing a lot of make-up? Did I make up a lot of the content? Is the content true? Are my theories about Earth being alive true? In order to make my book as a female look pretty, did I put a lot of make-up on her? Is the majority of my content just a bunch of made-up nonsense?

It means that if you were to strip the make-up off my book as a female, would she be ugly? Or does the book have a natural beauty with or without make-up? If my book is attractive and it looks like I didn't make up very much of the content or fake some of the sections, it would be like an attractive female that wore very little make-up and still looks gorgeous. That would be literary beauty. It's where you can gaze at my book like an attractive female, and she's really pretty.

If the book is the female, then the book cover would be the clothing that she has on. When you look through the books that are published online, you glance at the book covers. Are the book covers appealing? Do they catch your eye? Is there good balance of color? Can you make out the lines? Is it visually appealing? I used to dabble as a graphic designer and know a bit about Photoshop. So when I make my own book covers and know my content well, I have an idea of what would look good as a cover for my book as a female.

You'll see a lot of books that have really good content, but the book covers aren't done very well. That's like a really attractive female that isn't wearing very good clothing. Then you'll have books that have really good artwork, but the content of the book is awful. That's like a product that has really good packaging and marketing, but the product itself sucks. This is why it's nice that some eBook publishing sites allow you to read a sample of the material before you purchase. That way, you know what you're getting and are less likely to suffer from buyer's remorse.

When you apply this concept to relationships with men who lie to their girlfriends all the time, it means those guys make up stuff. If a woman is dating a guy who lies all the time, that guy wears a lot of make-up. The woman should ask themselves, "Do I really want to date a guy who wears more make-up than I do?"

When you're at a bar and a guy walks up to a woman making up stuff to make themselves look good, he wears a lot of make-up.

Piece of advice: Find yourself a man who doesn't need to use make-up to look good.

Take my word for it when I say that when it comes to the subject of Cryptology where I claim I know the field inside and out, I don't need to wear make-up. I don't have to make anything up when I say that Earth functions like a Super Computer where Earth's Electromagnetic Field is a communication grid and that there's a Subconscious Collective.

I'm telling you how it is. It's all true. I'm confident in my research and findings. I've worked out in the field for the last 8 years. A lot of other Cryptologists are going by what they read in a book. It's not the same as being out in the field.

It's the difference between a medical student reading something in a book and a surgeon working in a M.A.S.H. unit during war time performing triage where they have to make split second decisions on who they can save and who they can't.

Most Cryptologists have never had to use Cryptology as if their life depended on it.

I have.

That's why I know Cryptology, and more specifically Planet Cryptology, better than most people out there. You have to learn how to read the planet that speaks in metaphors. When you master reading metaphors, you understand other things in the form of metaphors. That boosts your level of wisdom and analytical problem-solving skills because you know how to relate information.

When people read my literature where I draw relationships between things, you can tell that it is a reflection of having worked in Cryptology that relies heavily on using metaphors as a form of communication with the Subconscious Collective and Consciousness of the Planet. They don't have normal voices like humans. So they fashion metaphors in order to convey messages.

Truth is beauty, and beauty is truth. In the long run, you can tell when someone is telling the truth. They don't trip over their lies because they're not making anything up. They're going by actual memory and what they recall from their personal experience.

## Chapter 3.4  
Sewing Together Material and If Your Parents Still Dress You

I don't work in the fashion industry, but designing a book is similar to designing clothing. A clothing designer will develop a name for themselves as they continue to push out clothing designs that people want to buy. The craftsmanship of the design will show in their work. That justifies the price. Stores will want to carry that merchandise from that designer.

As an author, we do literary clothing design. Each book published is like a line of clothing. The more books you put out as an author would be like more designs you put out as a fashion designer. When readers discover your literature, it's like a group of people that discover your clothing and start wearing them.

If you look at the debate between religious groups and the scientific community, there's this debate on Intelligent Design and whether God exists or not. You'll have people who belong to either extreme. However, there's another fashion market niche out there. It's the people don't really care for either style. They don't totally buy into the God concept depicted in the Bible. Yet, they don't fully believe the atheist community that is saying there's nothing at all.

They don't like either clothing style. However, because they are limited in their selection, they have to make due. What I'm offering is a whole new style of clothing where I sewed together some snippets of fabric from the religious community about the concept of God and I hemmed it together with fabric from the scientific community about Carl Jung's Unconscious Collective Theory. When you sew both materials together, you end up with a piece of clothing that points to Earth, as a living organism, that would be like God.

Once I got the design down, it was just a matter of using good materials and paying attention to the details so that the craftsmanship and quality is there. So as a book translated over as a clothing design, I'm the author taking the role of a clothing designer that has to make sure that the logic and arguments are sound.

When I don't sew information together well, it would look like portions of the cloth that have loose threads or where the stitching wasn't done well. It would mean that if a person wore the clothes I designed but it starts to fall apart because I didn't use good materials or where I was sloppy with the stitching.

However, if I do it right, when people come across my book as clothing, they start to wear it. Wearing it would be readers who understand my concepts, agree with most of what I said, and like wearing it.

If I didn't outline a very good argument, it would be like an ugly piece of clothing that someone wouldn't want to be caught dead wearing. If I wrote my arguments poorly, it would be like a terribly designed piece of clothing that people that would turn people off.

Do Your Parents Still Dress You?

Our parents dressed us as kids. No matter how independent you are today and where you choose your own clothing, at some point in your life, your parents dressed you. Maybe you've got old photos where you're wearing something your parents put on you before they took the picture.

When it comes to ideals and beliefs as articles of clothing, our parents dress us as well. Some parents want you to wear what they wear. Some parents just had you wear what was popular during that time period when you were an infant. It wasn't that they really had any opinion about it. It was just clothing that was popular during that time.

When it comes to religion where parents try to have their kids follow suit, it would be religious clothing. It would be like the Amish. No offense to the Amish community, but from what I've seen their garb hasn't really changed that much in terms of style over the last 200 years. If you think of religious beliefs like clothing, the clothing style of religion hasn't changed much over the last 500 years. So religious groups would be like people with an Intellectually Amish sense of clothing style.

Though the irony is that when you weave together the old and the new, it can come out warped. Sewing together the concept of God from the Bible with modern science would be like "Amish Paradise" by Weird Al Yankovic that parodies "Gangsta's Paradise" by Coolio. It's where you're merging the Amish culture with modern rap. By taking the old concept of the existence of God and sewing it together with modern science ideas with James Lovelock's Gaia Theory about Earth as a living organism and Carl Jung's Unconscious Collective Theory, it would look like that Weird Al Yankovic song.

For those readers laughing at the terribly unflattering analogy, it's okay. You really do need to have a sense of humor about it all. You shouldn't take science or religion too seriously. If people actually studied history and could decrypt the tags that Earth has used to mark major events that have influenced humankind, you will find that Earth as a really funny sense of humor. Earth pokes fun at humankind all the time. Earth runs on geological time. I claim that Earth is the equivalent of God. When you see jokes that Earth has laced throughout history, it's like God making a joke that takes 500 years to tell. However, when God's finished telling the joke, it's really funny.

I swear if you master Cryptology and apply it to human history and catch all the zingers that Earth tells that went over the heads of people, you would be rolling on the floor laughing right now. On a side note, notice I stress U.S. state dates. If you watch the Weird Al music video, there's a cameo by actress Florence Henderson born 2/14 of 1934. Oregon and Arizona became states on 2/14. So it's a state date birthday.

"Gangsta's Paradise" rap artist Coolio is born 8/1 of 1963. Colorado became a state on 8/1 of 1876. This reinforces my case that state dates are relevant in the Entertainment and Music Industry. Weird Al (Alabama) apologized to Coolio for making a parody without his permission. There was some kind of mix-up where Coolio didn't give permission, but somehow that got lost in translation.

Coolio goes on to make a cameo in the movie "Get Over It." It's a movie where Ben Foster, as Berke Landers, can't decide whether he wants to be with Kelly (Kirsten Dunst) or Allison (Melissa Sagemiller). Kirsten Dunst is born 4/30 of 1982, which is when Louisiana became a state. If you know your movie trivia, Kirsten Dunst's career was launched by "Interview with the Vampire." That was with Tom Cruise born 7/3. Idaho became a state on 7/3. It also starred Brad Pitt born 12/18. New Jersey became a state 12/18.

Kelly's older brother is Colin Hanks, whose father Tom Hanks is born 7/9 when Louisiana rejoined after the Civil War. Tom Hanks married his wife Rita Wilson on 4/30, which is Kirsten Dunst's birthday. Melissa Sagemiller is born 6/1 of 1974, which is when Kentucky and Tennessee became states. So technically, Berke couldn't decide between two state date girls.

## Chapter 3.5  
You Have No Close

I claim it was no accident when the English words "close" and "clothes" became homonyms. In marketing, "close" means to persuade someone to do something like purchase a product. In fashion, "clothes" would refer to a wardrobe.

When people have to sell others on an idea or what they project about themselves to look appealing to others, they need "close." That fits with the homonym of clothes as a wardrobe applied to Adam and Eve who were originally naked. When they found out they were exposed and showing parts of themselves they didn't want others to see, they needed "clothes."

Truth is beauty, and beauty is truth. There's the concept of Inner Beauty. A person could be beautiful on the outside, but ugly on the inside. That's a person with a mean spirit or a rotten person. They may be physically attractive but if you could translate their personality into physical beauty, they'd be extremely ugly. If you watch "Shallow Hal," it shows how Jack Black's character Hal is brainwashed by Anthony Robbins into seeing people's true beauty. He sees their Inner Beauty.

When you have a really beautiful soul and you're a good person, you would look a male Chippendale dancer with a rock-hard Mr. Universe or Superman physique or look like a Playboy Playmate model.

When you look beautiful on the inside, you don't need to wear "close."

You don't have to "close" people on what you say. Everything you say is true. So that truth is beauty.

If you are a person who lies or makes up a lot of stuff, you wear a lot of "close."

When it comes to Karmic Credit Scores, the people who have the least to fear about the Subconscious Collective that knows everything about them are the ones who were sincere and honest. They have nothing to hide. So they look like really attractive people in the spiritual plane. You want to see them without "close."

It's one of the most ingenious examples of how the planet doctored the languages we use. It's one of the best examples I can submit to prove the existence of Intelligent Design and that Earth is alive. It took the time to build languages that have encrypted symbols woven into them. It actually does make a difference if you don't know the difference between their, there, and they're when they're translated over as acronyms. The different letters mean different abbreviations. So when you invoke a word that you misspelled, it affects the meaning you're trying to project.

I don't if or when I'll have time to write a volume about different Alphabets and romance languages like Spanish, Italian, French, and German. However, if you use Google Translate to compare what one word is in one language and what it is in another, that's becomes a linguistic Algebra equation when you use substitution.

For example, the definite article of "the" in Spanish and French is EL and LE. One version of "the" is the reversal of letters in another language. If both mean "the" it means EL and LE mean the same thing. So you're looking at a Linguistic Qubit. It's a verbal quantum bit. If EL and LE both mean the same thing and they're reversals of one another, it's like a quantum bit that can function as a 0 and a 1.

When you say Spain as S(Pa)in, it's the word Sin with Pa inside. It means Sin with Father inside. The abbreviation for France is FR, which means father. El means "God" in Hebrew. So if EL is "the" in Spanish but also "the" is LE in French, it means it's all one in the same.

So with close and clothes, the more pure or honest my information source is, the more beautiful my writing becomes. That's what readers are seeking. You want truth. You want wisdom that is pure and comes from true source of information.

Attitude Influences Ability to Learn

When Stanley Tucci did his scene where Andy was complaining about how she felt she was being treated badly, he instantly became one of my favorite actors. Plus, he's also born 11/11 of 1960. My home state of Washington gained statehood on 11/11 of 1889. Not to mention, he was Dr. Abraham Erskine, who created the Super Soldier Serum in "Captain America." He was so funny in "Easy A" as the cool dad to Emma Stone. You really wanted to hate him as Frank Dixon in "The Terminal" but he turned out to be really cool at the end.

FRANK DIXON: Okay, so let's say this bag of potato chips is Krakozhia and this apple is the Liberty Rebels. Okay?

(Frank smashes the apple on the potato chips flattening and splattering them all over Viktor played by Tom Hanks staring blankly back at him with chips all over him)

FRANK: DIXON: No more Krakozhia!

I love Stanley Tucci's facial expression, as Frank Dixon, when Viktor says finds a loophole for getting medicine meant for the father is animal medicine for the goat. "He love that goat."

On a side note, the reason why I liked the movie "The Terminal" is because when I crossed over into the Subconscious Collective, I was just like Viktor Navorski who fell through the cracks where he couldn't step on U.S. soil past the terminal gates and he couldn't go back to his home country because his passport was no longer valid.

If Krakozhia is the Conscious Plane, U.S. soil would be the Subconscious Plane. The English language, that Viktor didn't know how to speak, would be like the mathematical language and encrypted data that Subconscious Minds use to communicate. Just like Viktor stuck in limbo in that airport, I had to learn how to speak the mathematical language.

The other problem was that just like Viktor, I was stuck where I couldn't leave. So just like Viktor, I had to learn how to survive living at the airport that symbolizes purgatory as a man without a country. The auto defense program that is designed to turn Conscious Minds of people away from realizing there is a Subconscious Collective would be like Frank Dixon. Usually the program that shields the Consciousness of the Planet is successful in turning people away. However, just like Viktor, I never gave up. That was because I really had a reason to cross over to the other side in the same way Viktor was getting the last signature for "Jazz" on behalf of his deceased father.

So just like all the airport employees watching to see how long Viktor will survive at the airport, there were Subconscious Minds watching me mucking around in the Subconscious Plane watching to see how long I'd last. Viktor eventually gets hired under the table as a construction worker. We find out that Viktor has an artistic ability where he can craft murals. That's similar to me where I have a natural writing style that I use when I write blogs.

When you read my volume set on my experiences regarding Cryptology hoping to get a passport to be welcomed back into society and accepted by the scientific community for my research where I've been waiting for 8 years, it's just like Viktor stuck in the airport.

However, there's a wrench in Viktor's plans when Frank Dixon tries to blackmail Viktor at the end. He says that if Viktor doesn't go back to Krakohzia, he's going to deport one of Viktor's friends and the other two fired for gambling on the premises if he doesn't comply. You see a very dark side of Frank Dixon surface all in his quest to maintain authority and control.

You do want someone like him managing the airport. However, sometimes there is that 0.1 percent of the travelers who fall through the cracks who may not have the proper paperwork, but they earned the right to cross over because they wanted it badly enough.

Just like Viktor who refused to be deterred from completing his quest for his dad, I did the same thing in pursuing a course to cross over and prove the Subconscious Collective did indeed exist because I was trying to rescue a 23 year friendship that was destroyed in 2004 as a result of people who didn't believe in my findings. I didn't do this research for a Nobel Peace Prize or notoriety. I did it in an attempt to save a friendship.

Sadly, it didn't work. So all the research you're reading is the leftover a failed attempt to establish a case to my friend with a Computer Science degree who worked for NASA who I knew wouldn't believe me unless I came up with the best argument that science could offer. That's why when you read this research, you don't realize there was a lot of blood, sweat, and toil that went into gathering 8 years of information that is being served to you on a platter.

There's a scene in "Devil Wears Prada" where Andy goes to Nigel in tears blubbering about how she works so hard and isn't getting acknowledged. Nothing she seems to do is right. Nigel tells her to quit. He could find a girl who would take her place in 5 minutes. Not only that, it would be someone who really wants the job.

Andy argues that she's really trying hard and killing herself over this job. Nigel gives her some tough love about business and the fashion industry. He talks about how influential this magazine is and the work that Miranda Priestly does. Yet, to Andy, it doesn't mean anything. There are so many people that would die to work where she only "deigns" to work. Then Andy wonders why Miranda doesn't give her a gold star on her forehead for her homework.

And at the expense of coming across really cold and insulting to the readers, many of the people reading this book are just like Andy. Maybe these readers think Cryptology is interesting. Maybe they had some time to kill before their next flight on an airplane. Maybe they were bored and browsing the free section and stumbled across this book. They read this book just because they have nothing else better to do.

However, like Nigel, I'll flat out tell everyone who reads this book that the Subconscious Collective, as the Consciousness of the Planet, is just like working for Miranda Priestly. Anyone who works for Miranda Priestly can get any job they want. If the planet as a living organism is like Miranda, it means that anyone who works for the planet or dedicates their lives to the planet can have just about any job they want.

The planet Earth is like a powerful magazine editor. The Subconscious Collective is like the fashion magazine that is distributed all across the planet to people as readers. It's the most powerful position in the world when you get into the inner circle of the planet that is networked globally or internationally. When you tap into the Subconscious Collective that interconnects with every living person on the planet, we're talking about every billionaire, celebrity, music artist, and powerful CEO on the planet.

When people read these theories with mild interest about the Subconscious Collective, it's just like Andy. Andy wasn't really trying hard. I've attempted to train students over the last 6 years on the Subconscious Collective, but just like Andy, they either lacked the interest or dropped out of the program because it got too hard. If people really knew how much power you're talking about and that it is possible to connect with the planet and be in tune with its Planetary RSS Feed, they'd be falling all over themselves vying for the attention of the planet.

Right now is the best time to get in good with the planet while nobody knows it exists. If you're one of the first people to be reading this book, you should be trying to get ahead of the pack. You should be trying to learn everything you can about the Subconscious Collective and this field of study. Few people have heard of Cryptology, aside from what they saw from "Da Vinci Code" starring Tom Hanks. They haven't put the clues together yet. That's the undiscovered country.

## Chapter 3.6  
Walking Away from the Fashion Industry

One of the pivotal scenes in the movie is when Miranda says that Andy is on her way to greatness and becoming just like her. Everyone wants to be like them. However, Andy doesn't like how Miranda burned Nigel on his long-awaited promotion to save her own skin. Andy saw that she was becoming like Miranda when she went to Paris in lieu of Emily who had been planning to go to the event.

While I talk about how people should jump on the bandwagon on the idea of Earth being alive, there could also be a point in your life where you may have to know when to pull away. Working in the Subconscious Collective can become addictive. It's addictive because you constantly interact with them. It's like a first person shooter perspective of in a video game. Your environment becomes a video game. You're constantly in it. You can't really get away from it. It's everywhere.

The Subconscious Collective is like the Matrix. When you watch the movie "The Matrix," you see at the end how Neo sees everything in black with green symbols cycling that are dripping down the walls. He sees the actual code of the Matrix that escapes the notice of everyone else living in the Matrix. When you cross over, it will be just like that. When you walk through a public street and you watch all the signs, you'll see things that Neo does. You'll see the software program and operating system that is in effect. I'm not kidding when I say Earth's a Super Computer. It's like that Electromagnetic Field encompassing the planet that you can't see. It is invisible to the naked eye, but it's there.

This comes back to the scene I mentioned where Andy was smirking at Miranda and her entourage fussing over clothing and being shown how the decisions made in that very room influenced her buying decision with the ratty looking sweater she had on. You may not think you're influenced by the Subconscious Collective that manages our world like the Matrix, but you are. You don't need to be afraid of it. Just know that Earth functions like a corporation. It's just like a business. It has to carry out these operations in order to survive.

Andy's choice to leave the fashion industry would be like your choice to leave the Matrix or unplug. You can unplug from the Matrix. Just do it for the right reasons. Unplugging from the Matrix is like the child reaching adulthood and unplugging from the parent that has spent all that time raising the child. There comes a time in a child's life where they reach maturation and adulthood where it is necessary to spread their wings and leave the nest.

In relationships where we outgrow people, it's similar when it comes to unplugging ourselves from someone else whom we were intertwined with. Sometimes people's needs change. There can come a time where two people aligned with each other, but then they began to want different things. That's where you unplug or go your separate ways.

So with the Matrix of the planet, you have a relationship with Earth. You can be part of Earth or you can unplug. If you unplug, do it for the right reason. Do it because you know there's a time where you shouldn't follow the herd. For example, there's a prevailing belief in the scientific community that there is no God. Then there's the other side that is trying to tell you that there is God. Depending on which side you lean toward, you may need to unplug.

## Chapter 3.7  
Sunflower Diaries, Volume 3 Conclusion

I acknowledge there will be a few people who come across my literature about Earth being alive that will find it ridiculous or some wild fantasy. However, maybe fewer would feel that way if they could see that society could benefit in the long term with the idea of Earth as a living thing. It will develop a stronger sense of community and global good will because people around the world will all know they're working toward something. It gives humankind a goal, which is to help the planet. When people don't have a goal in life, they become unfocused.

For example, some people may not buy into my writing where I claim Earth is alive. However, I think readers will agree that my writing has a sense of purpose. Whether people like what I have to say or not, they can tell from my writing that I have a goal or a purpose. I'm lobbying to create more awareness or get the word out that Earth is alive and that we have technology today that can prove that it is sentient. So that becomes my focus. My writing becomes focused because I have a long term goal of establishing a case of Earth as a living thing. It's something I'm passionate about. That gives my writing an edge over other authors that are just writing about random topics that catch their fancy or what they hope to make money on.

For anyone who has stumbled across this volume set, they'll notice that I haven't been charging money for these books. My mom wasn't comfortable with the idea when I told her that I would be giving this literature away for free. She was concerned about how I've dedicated 8 years of my life to studying Cryptology and the Subconscious Collective where time and money out of my own pocket has been heavily invested into this. Yet, I'm not charging money for it.

Maybe I will at some point with future volumes. I don't know. Sadly, as much as a person may want to maintain an altruistic stance and provide this information for free, it takes money to maintain a research facility and devoting time to scanning the Associated Press Feed daily. Plus, you need to take care of the simple things like eating and having a roof over your head. I've spent the last 8 years paying for everything out of pocket as a one-man research facility conducting experiments in this field of Cryptology.

Some people will wonder why I didn't obtain funding. Well, first of all, it's hard being taken seriously with these theories. What's sad is that there are times where even I don't blame people for rolling their eyes when I tell them. They haven't seen what I've seen over the last 8 years. You don't see the high rate of coincidence that would stump people on how I do it. It's because I know the Electromagnetic Field does indeed work as a communication grid.

In fact, on my old research blog, Facebook, and Twitter, I used to provide examples where I'd lay out mathematical variables and I'd show they would manifest within a 24 to 48 hour period in the Associated Press Feed. It amazes me today that people haven't figured out how to create a public forum using Twitter or Facebook where you have a public audience monitoring your Tweets. You can use your Twitter audience as witnesses to show that you can post a Tweet that gets locked under surveillance and then compare the Symbol that was stated in the Tweet and watch it manifest in the news feed within a 48 hour period. I'm not just talking about one random coincidence either. I'm talking about a string of symbols with pinpoint accuracy. Because people are watching your Tweets that get posted, they know you said something before it actually happened.

It's not magic either. It's just showcasing that the Subconscious Collective's Planetary RSS Feed moves faster than the Associated Press Feed with the manmade Internet. Subconscious Minds are already mapping out events months or years ahead of time. I would tell my former students whom I taught that next week has already happened. Everything you see in the news has already been put on the docket or the printing queue ready for publishing.

The analogy I'd use to explain this phenomenon is when you plan a major wedding. If you want to invite hundreds of guests, reserve the cathedral, reserve the hotel for the wedding reception, get the wedding dress ready, and have all the bridesmaids dresses prepared, you usually have to plan a year in advance. People need time to prepare, clear their schedules, and get ready for the event.

The Subconscious Collective functions the same way. These coincidences aren't magic. It's just like putting in reservations early or ahead of time to ensure that they work. The other problem with the way scientists look at things is that they expect 100 percent perfection in order for a newly introduced scientific theory to be valid. If the results don't work for them, then it can't be plausible.

When I do this stuff, I will probably have about 40 percent accuracy. While that may not seem very high or reliable, you have to look at it more like basketball statistics. If I was a basketball player, it would be my accuracy when it comes to free throws from the 3 point line. I may not always get the ball in the hoop 100 percent of the time, but if you watched me do 100 free throws, I could probably get the ball in the basket 40 times as opposed to anyone else attempting to do the same thing in cryptology that would probably only average about 3 to 5 lucky shots. The mind is a muscle. You have to practice.

If you take to heart what I teach in this volume set, you will become a good Cryptologist as well. Then you'll be able to do what I do. The world needs more Cryptologists.

## Carbon 3  
Conclusion

I'm running out of time and I haven't finished the conclusion. I didn't get to talk about Psychic Forensics. Linden Labs stated that the hack may have occurred through Skype that was compromised.

Elysia had said that while she understands what I said, she believes I still need to dumb this information down for people. I tried to tell her that I've simplified the content as much as I could. I don't know if I can simplify it anymore.

It's like teaching a Level 300 Business Management Class. You're expected to already have taken courses that in Level 200 Business before you can take the 300 Level one. Some courses will say in the university catalog that you can't take a particular course until you've had the other course. It's a prerequisite.

I claim it's the same thing with this. Readers may find this computer programming stuff convoluted and confusing, but you're supposed to know this stuff already. If you don't, then you have to make it a point on your own to catch up on your reading. It's not the responsibility of the professor to have to go back and cover material you should have already been familiar with.

You can:

\- Curse at me

\- Spit on me

\- Yell at me

However, you would never see college students throw a temper tantrum at a college professor teaching higher learning for a class that has requirements. Students understand that they have to take prerequisite courses.

Sadly, the prerequisite material for this course has been unpublished due to legal problems. So you're going to have to find your own way in playing catch up. If you were lucky enough to keep on top of the downloads where you have the entire set of books, good for you. I'd tell that person to hold on to them because it's an extremely valuable set since it's no longer in print. Even if these new volumes being published have them, they won't be the same. They'll have information [Redacted]. Only a select few will have the entire story.

I really hope people will appreciate how much work I'm putting into publishing this for people. It's material you need to know. While other people write nonfiction and are done with it and charge money, I end up having to write it over a 2nd time, and it's all for free.

I hope people start to see that this content must have been really important if the author's willing to get knocked down, get back up again, and rewrite an entire collection of 84 volumes done in a year all over again.

" _And it all started with a Big Ban!"_

