In what can only be called “The Massacre
at Channel 4,” clinical psychologist
Jordan Peterson blew up C4 
like a human block of C4.
But while the interview is being used to demonstrate—
conclusively, mind you—
the intellectual depravity of feminist rage-blobs 
like Cathy Newman, Peterson’s constant appeals
to facts and research allow us to use his responses for 
other, perhaps even more significant, purposes.
Take his comments about the intelligence of
women.
Newman accused Peterson of claiming that women
are less intelligent than men, at which point
Peterson started laughing.
So Newman, in a rare moment of clarity, decided
to simply ask Peterson whether women are
less intelligent than men.
Are women less intelligent than men?
No.
No, they’re not.
No, the data on that’s pretty clear.
The average IQ for a woman and the average
IQ for a man is identical.
There is some debate about the flatness of
the distribution, which is something that
James Damore pointed out, for example, in
his memo.
But there’s no difference at all in general
cognitive ability.
“No difference at all in general cognitive
ability.”
There’s no difference at all in general
cognitive ability.
What does Jordan Peterson believe?
That there’s no difference in intelligence
between men and women.
Why does he believe it?
Because the studies have been done, and the
matter is settled.
In this brief clip, Peterson not only refuted
Newman’s claim that he views women as less
intelligent than men, he also . . . refuted
Islam.
Nearly fourteen centuries ago, the prophet
of Islam inadvertently proposed a scientific
experiment, which, if conducted properly,
could destroy his credibility.
It began with the revelation of the longest
verse in the Quran.
Surah 2, verse 282 of the Quran deals with
contracts.
But there’s an interesting part in the middle
that says:
And get two witnesses out of your own men.
And if there are not two men (available),
then a man and two women, such as you agree
for witnesses, so that if one of them (one of the 
two women) errs, the other can remind her.
So, if two men aren’t available as witnesses,
you should get a man and two women.
Notice that it takes the testimony of two
women to equal the testimony of one man.
In other words, the testimony of a woman is
half as reliable as the testimony of a man.
Why is this?
Well, Muhammad explains in Sahih al-Bukhari
2658:
Narrated Abu Sa’id Al-Khudri:
The Prophet said: “Isn’t the witness of
a woman equal to half of that of a man?”
The women said: “Yes.”
He said: “This is because of the deficiency
of a woman’s mind.”
The testimony of women is unreliable because
women are, by nature, stupid.
Their minds are deficient.
Let’s read another passage where Muhammad
discusses the intellectual deficiencies of women.
Sahih Muslim Number 241:
It was narrated from Abdullah bin Umar that
the Messenger of Allah said:
“O women, give in charity and pray a great
deal for forgiveness, for I have seen that
you are the majority of the people of the
Fire.”
A wise woman among them said:
“Why is it, O Messenger of Allah, that we
are the majority of the people of the Fire?”
He said: “You curse a great deal and are
ungrateful to your husbands.
I have never seen anyone so deficient in intellect
and religion, more overwhelming to a man of
wisdom and reason than you.”
She said: “O Messenger of Allah, what does
deficient in intellect and religion mean?”
He said: “As for lacking in intellect, the
testimony of two women is equivalent to the
testimony of one man—this is deficiency
in intellect.
And (a woman) does not perform Salat for several
days, and she does not fast (during her menses)
in Ramadan—this is deficiency in religion.”
So, Muhammad has given us yet another way
of testing his prophethood.
If Muhammad is a true prophet, then, when
men and women are given IQ exams,
women will be shown to have significantly 
lower IQ scores than men.
Unfortunately for Muhammad and his followers,
men and women have been given IQ exams,
and Muhammad was wrong . . . yet again.
Why did Muhammad mistakenly think that women
are intellectually deficient?
Perhaps he knew a woman like Cathy Newman,
who couldn’t understand anything he said.
“I don’t know how I can say this any more
clearly.
Stars are missiles that Allah uses to shoot
demons when they try to sneak into Paradise.”
“So you’re saying that demons are missiles
that stars use to hunt transgender lobsters.”
“You so deserve your future career as a
meme.”
On a side note, let’s recall that Cathy
Newman got her flannel panties in a bunch
when she thought, wrongly, that Jordan Peterson
believed that women are less intelligent than men.
But Muhammad actually believed that women
are considerably less intelligent than men.
So, obviously, Cathy Newman, and her fellow
feminists, will do everything in their power
to expose Muhammad’s wicked belief in the
intellectual inferiority of women.
Is that what you’re going to do, Cathy?
I’m sorry. I’m just trying to work that out. I mean.
Ha! Gotcha.
You have got me. You have got me.
I’m trying work that through my head.
So what you’re saying, Cathy, is that you
don’t really care what people think about women.
A man’s view of women is simply a tool you
use to attack him if you despise him for completely
different reasons.
Does that sound about right?
You don’t have to answer, Cathy.
But if I am right, just dance horribly for
a few seconds.
C4 style!
And that, my friends, is how you expose both
Islam and the leftists who defend it . . .
in a single video.
If you want more, be sure to subscribe, as
Jordan Peterson laughs at Cathy trying to dance.
C4 style! What! What! What! What! C4 style!
