>>>
>>> THE
>>> THE RULES
>>> THE RULES WOULD
>>> THE RULES WOULD END
>>> THE RULES WOULD END WHAT'S
>>> THE RULES WOULD END WHAT'S
CALLED
>>> THE RULES WOULD END WHAT'S
CALLED AUTOMATIC
>>> THE RULES WOULD END WHAT'S
CALLED AUTOMATIC ELIGIBILITY
CALLED AUTOMATIC ELIGIBILITY
CALLED AUTOMATIC ELIGIBILITY
FOR
CALLED AUTOMATIC ELIGIBILITY
FOR PEOPLE
CALLED AUTOMATIC ELIGIBILITY
FOR PEOPLE WHO
CALLED AUTOMATIC ELIGIBILITY
FOR PEOPLE WHO ALREADY
CALLED AUTOMATIC ELIGIBILITY
FOR PEOPLE WHO ALREADY GET
FOR PEOPLE WHO ALREADY GET
FOR PEOPLE WHO ALREADY GET
FEDERAL
FOR PEOPLE WHO ALREADY GET
FEDERAL AID
FOR PEOPLE WHO ALREADY GET
FEDERAL AID WITHOUT
FOR PEOPLE WHO ALREADY GET
FEDERAL AID WITHOUT UNDERGOING
FEDERAL AID WITHOUT UNDERGOING
FEDERAL AID WITHOUT UNDERGOING
FURTHER
FEDERAL AID WITHOUT UNDERGOING
FURTHER REVIEW
FEDERAL AID WITHOUT UNDERGOING
FURTHER REVIEW OVER
FEDERAL AID WITHOUT UNDERGOING
FURTHER REVIEW OVER THEIR
FURTHER REVIEW OVER THEIR
FURTHER REVIEW OVER THEIR
INCOME.
INCOME.
INCOME.
ADAM
INCOME.
ADAM BENNETT
INCOME.
ADAM BENNETT BREAKS
INCOME.
ADAM BENNETT BREAKS DOWN
ADAM BENNETT BREAKS DOWN
ADAM BENNETT BREAKS DOWN
THECHANGES.
THECHANGES.
THECHANGES.
ADAM?
ADAM?
ADAM?
>>
ADAM?
>> Reporter:
ADAM?
>> Reporter: ABOUT
ADAM?
>> Reporter: ABOUT THREE
ADAM?
>> Reporter: ABOUT THREE AND
ADAM?
>> Reporter: ABOUT THREE AND A
>> Reporter: ABOUT THREE AND A
>> Reporter: ABOUT THREE AND A
HALF
>> Reporter: ABOUT THREE AND A
HALF MILLION
>> Reporter: ABOUT THREE AND A
HALF MILLION TEXANS
>> Reporter: ABOUT THREE AND A
HALF MILLION TEXANS ARE
HALF MILLION TEXANS ARE
HALF MILLION TEXANS ARE
AVAILABLE
HALF MILLION TEXANS ARE
AVAILABLE FOR
HALF MILLION TEXANS ARE
AVAILABLE FOR SNAP.
AVAILABLE FOR SNAP.
AVAILABLE FOR SNAP.
THEY
AVAILABLE FOR SNAP.
THEY COULD
AVAILABLE FOR SNAP.
THEY COULD APPLY
AVAILABLE FOR SNAP.
THEY COULD APPLY AT
THEY COULD APPLY AT
THEY COULD APPLY AT
MULTISERVICE
THEY COULD APPLY AT
MULTISERVICE CENTERS
THEY COULD APPLY AT
MULTISERVICE CENTERS LIKE
THEY COULD APPLY AT
MULTISERVICE CENTERS LIKE THIS
MULTISERVICE CENTERS LIKE THIS
MULTISERVICE CENTERS LIKE THIS
ONE.
ONE.
ONE.
THE
ONE.
THE USDA
ONE.
THE USDA SAYS
ONE.
THE USDA SAYS THE
ONE.
THE USDA SAYS THE NEW
ONE.
THE USDA SAYS THE NEW CHANGES
THE USDA SAYS THE NEW CHANGES
THE USDA SAYS THE NEW CHANGES
COULD
THE USDA SAYS THE NEW CHANGES
COULD SAVE
THE USDA SAYS THE NEW CHANGES
COULD SAVE ABOUT
THE USDA SAYS THE NEW CHANGES
COULD SAVE ABOUT $2.5
THE USDA SAYS THE NEW CHANGES
COULD SAVE ABOUT $2.5 BILLION
THE USDA SAYS THE NEW CHANGES
COULD SAVE ABOUT $2.5 BILLION A
COULD SAVE ABOUT $2.5 BILLION A
COULD SAVE ABOUT $2.5 BILLION A
YEAR
COULD SAVE ABOUT $2.5 BILLION A
YEAR BY
COULD SAVE ABOUT $2.5 BILLION A
YEAR BY GETTING
COULD SAVE ABOUT $2.5 BILLION A
YEAR BY GETTING LESS
COULD SAVE ABOUT $2.5 BILLION A
YEAR BY GETTING LESS NEEDY
YEAR BY GETTING LESS NEEDY
YEAR BY GETTING LESS NEEDY
PEOPLE
YEAR BY GETTING LESS NEEDY
PEOPLE OFF
YEAR BY GETTING LESS NEEDY
PEOPLE OFF THE
YEAR BY GETTING LESS NEEDY
PEOPLE OFF THE ROLES.
PEOPLE OFF THE ROLES.
PEOPLE OFF THE ROLES.
THE
PEOPLE OFF THE ROLES.
THE HEAD
PEOPLE OFF THE ROLES.
THE HEAD OF
PEOPLE OFF THE ROLES.
THE HEAD OF THE
PEOPLE OFF THE ROLES.
THE HEAD OF THE LOCAL
PEOPLE OFF THE ROLES.
THE HEAD OF THE LOCAL FOOD
PEOPLE OFF THE ROLES.
THE HEAD OF THE LOCAL FOOD BANK
THE HEAD OF THE LOCAL FOOD BANK
THE HEAD OF THE LOCAL FOOD BANK
WORRIES
THE HEAD OF THE LOCAL FOOD BANK
WORRIES IT
THE HEAD OF THE LOCAL FOOD BANK
WORRIES IT COULD
THE HEAD OF THE LOCAL FOOD BANK
WORRIES IT COULD INCREASE
WORRIES IT COULD INCREASE
WORRIES IT COULD INCREASE
HUNGER.
HUNGER.
HUNGER.
>>
HUNGER.
>> Reporter:
HUNGER.
>> Reporter: IT
HUNGER.
>> Reporter: IT IS
HUNGER.
>> Reporter: IT IS JOSE
>> Reporter: IT IS JOSE
>> Reporter: IT IS JOSE
PRESIDENT
>> Reporter: IT IS JOSE
PRESIDENT OBAMA
>> Reporter: IT IS JOSE
PRESIDENT OBAMA ADILLA'S
>> Reporter: IT IS JOSE
PRESIDENT OBAMA ADILLA'S SECOND
PRESIDENT OBAMA ADILLA'S SECOND
PRESIDENT OBAMA ADILLA'S SECOND
DAY
PRESIDENT OBAMA ADILLA'S SECOND
DAY ON
PRESIDENT OBAMA ADILLA'S SECOND
DAY ON THE
PRESIDENT OBAMA ADILLA'S SECOND
DAY ON THE JOB
PRESIDENT OBAMA ADILLA'S SECOND
DAY ON THE JOB AT
PRESIDENT OBAMA ADILLA'S SECOND
DAY ON THE JOB AT THE
PRESIDENT OBAMA ADILLA'S SECOND
DAY ON THE JOB AT THE FOOD
DAY ON THE JOB AT THE FOOD
DAY ON THE JOB AT THE FOOD
BANK,
DAY ON THE JOB AT THE FOOD
BANK, AND
DAY ON THE JOB AT THE FOOD
BANK, AND HIS
DAY ON THE JOB AT THE FOOD
BANK, AND HIS SECOND
DAY ON THE JOB AT THE FOOD
BANK, AND HIS SECOND DAY
DAY ON THE JOB AT THE FOOD
BANK, AND HIS SECOND DAY OFF
BANK, AND HIS SECOND DAY OFF
BANK, AND HIS SECOND DAY OFF
THE
BANK, AND HIS SECOND DAY OFF
THE NUTRITIONAL
BANK, AND HIS SECOND DAY OFF
THE NUTRITIONAL ASSISTANCE
THE NUTRITIONAL ASSISTANCE
THE NUTRITIONAL ASSISTANCE
PROGRAM
THE NUTRITIONAL ASSISTANCE
PROGRAM OR
THE NUTRITIONAL ASSISTANCE
PROGRAM OR SNAP.
PROGRAM OR SNAP.
PROGRAM OR SNAP.
>>
PROGRAM OR SNAP.
>> NOBODY
PROGRAM OR SNAP.
>> NOBODY THOUGHT
PROGRAM OR SNAP.
>> NOBODY THOUGHT IT
PROGRAM OR SNAP.
>> NOBODY THOUGHT IT WOULD
PROGRAM OR SNAP.
>> NOBODY THOUGHT IT WOULD EVER
>> NOBODY THOUGHT IT WOULD EVER
>> NOBODY THOUGHT IT WOULD EVER
HAPPEN
>> NOBODY THOUGHT IT WOULD EVER
HAPPEN TO
>> NOBODY THOUGHT IT WOULD EVER
HAPPEN TO ME.
HAPPEN TO ME.
HAPPEN TO ME.
>>
HAPPEN TO ME.
>> Reporter:
HAPPEN TO ME.
>> Reporter: THE
HAPPEN TO ME.
>> Reporter: THE NATIVE
>> Reporter: THE NATIVE
>> Reporter: THE NATIVE
HOUSTONIAN
>> Reporter: THE NATIVE
HOUSTONIAN SAID
>> Reporter: THE NATIVE
HOUSTONIAN SAID HE
>> Reporter: THE NATIVE
HOUSTONIAN SAID HE SIGNED
>> Reporter: THE NATIVE
HOUSTONIAN SAID HE SIGNED UP
HOUSTONIAN SAID HE SIGNED UP
HOUSTONIAN SAID HE SIGNED UP
FOR
HOUSTONIAN SAID HE SIGNED UP
FOR THE
HOUSTONIAN SAID HE SIGNED UP
FOR THE ASSISTANCE
HOUSTONIAN SAID HE SIGNED UP
FOR THE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
FOR THE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
FOR THE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
AFTER
FOR THE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
AFTER AN
FOR THE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
AFTER AN UNEXPECTED
FOR THE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
AFTER AN UNEXPECTED INCOME
FOR THE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
AFTER AN UNEXPECTED INCOME LOSS
AFTER AN UNEXPECTED INCOME LOSS
AFTER AN UNEXPECTED INCOME LOSS
A
AFTER AN UNEXPECTED INCOME LOSS
A COUPLE
AFTER AN UNEXPECTED INCOME LOSS
A COUPLE MONTHS
AFTER AN UNEXPECTED INCOME LOSS
A COUPLE MONTHS AGO.
A COUPLE MONTHS AGO.
A COUPLE MONTHS AGO.
>>
A COUPLE MONTHS AGO.
>> THAT
A COUPLE MONTHS AGO.
>> THAT DAY
A COUPLE MONTHS AGO.
>> THAT DAY I
A COUPLE MONTHS AGO.
>> THAT DAY I WOULD
A COUPLE MONTHS AGO.
>> THAT DAY I WOULD EITHER
A COUPLE MONTHS AGO.
>> THAT DAY I WOULD EITHER GO
>> THAT DAY I WOULD EITHER GO
>> THAT DAY I WOULD EITHER GO
DOWN
>> THAT DAY I WOULD EITHER GO
DOWN AND
>> THAT DAY I WOULD EITHER GO
DOWN AND SLEEP
>> THAT DAY I WOULD EITHER GO
DOWN AND SLEEP UNDER
>> THAT DAY I WOULD EITHER GO
DOWN AND SLEEP UNDER THE
>> THAT DAY I WOULD EITHER GO
DOWN AND SLEEP UNDER THE BRIDGE
DOWN AND SLEEP UNDER THE BRIDGE
DOWN AND SLEEP UNDER THE BRIDGE
OR
DOWN AND SLEEP UNDER THE BRIDGE
OR COME
DOWN AND SLEEP UNDER THE BRIDGE
OR COME UP
DOWN AND SLEEP UNDER THE BRIDGE
OR COME UP HERE.
OR COME UP HERE.
OR COME UP HERE.
>>
OR COME UP HERE.
>> Reporter:
OR COME UP HERE.
>> Reporter: BUT
OR COME UP HERE.
>> Reporter: BUT HE
OR COME UP HERE.
>> Reporter: BUT HE CREDITS
>> Reporter: BUT HE CREDITS
>> Reporter: BUT HE CREDITS
SNAP
>> Reporter: BUT HE CREDITS
SNAP WITH
>> Reporter: BUT HE CREDITS
SNAP WITH HELPING
>> Reporter: BUT HE CREDITS
SNAP WITH HELPING TO
>> Reporter: BUT HE CREDITS
SNAP WITH HELPING TO GET
>> Reporter: BUT HE CREDITS
SNAP WITH HELPING TO GET BACK
SNAP WITH HELPING TO GET BACK
SNAP WITH HELPING TO GET BACK
ON
SNAP WITH HELPING TO GET BACK
ON HIS
SNAP WITH HELPING TO GET BACK
ON HIS FEET.
ON HIS FEET.
ON HIS FEET.
BUT
ON HIS FEET.
BUT THE
ON HIS FEET.
BUT THE PROGRAM'S
ON HIS FEET.
BUT THE PROGRAM'S REQUIREMENTS
BUT THE PROGRAM'S REQUIREMENTS
BUT THE PROGRAM'S REQUIREMENTS
COULD
BUT THE PROGRAM'S REQUIREMENTS
COULD SOON
BUT THE PROGRAM'S REQUIREMENTS
COULD SOON CHANGE.
COULD SOON CHANGE.
COULD SOON CHANGE.
UNDER
COULD SOON CHANGE.
UNDER CURRENT
COULD SOON CHANGE.
UNDER CURRENT LAW,
COULD SOON CHANGE.
UNDER CURRENT LAW, MOST
COULD SOON CHANGE.
UNDER CURRENT LAW, MOST STATES
UNDER CURRENT LAW, MOST STATES
UNDER CURRENT LAW, MOST STATES
AUTOMATICALLY
UNDER CURRENT LAW, MOST STATES
AUTOMATICALLY MAKE
UNDER CURRENT LAW, MOST STATES
AUTOMATICALLY MAKE PEOPLE
AUTOMATICALLY MAKE PEOPLE
AUTOMATICALLY MAKE PEOPLE
ELIGIBLE
AUTOMATICALLY MAKE PEOPLE
ELIGIBLE FOR
AUTOMATICALLY MAKE PEOPLE
ELIGIBLE FOR FOOD
AUTOMATICALLY MAKE PEOPLE
ELIGIBLE FOR FOOD STAMPS
AUTOMATICALLY MAKE PEOPLE
ELIGIBLE FOR FOOD STAMPS IF
ELIGIBLE FOR FOOD STAMPS IF
ELIGIBLE FOR FOOD STAMPS IF
THEY
ELIGIBLE FOR FOOD STAMPS IF
THEY MEET
ELIGIBLE FOR FOOD STAMPS IF
THEY MEET REQUIREMENTS
ELIGIBLE FOR FOOD STAMPS IF
THEY MEET REQUIREMENTS UNDER
THEY MEET REQUIREMENTS UNDER
THEY MEET REQUIREMENTS UNDER
ANOTHER
THEY MEET REQUIREMENTS UNDER
ANOTHER FEDERAL
THEY MEET REQUIREMENTS UNDER
ANOTHER FEDERAL PROGRAM
THEY MEET REQUIREMENTS UNDER
ANOTHER FEDERAL PROGRAM CALLED
ANOTHER FEDERAL PROGRAM CALLED
ANOTHER FEDERAL PROGRAM CALLED
TEMF.
TEMF.
TEMF.
BUT
TEMF.
BUT INCOME
TEMF.
BUT INCOME AND
TEMF.
BUT INCOME AND ASSETS
TEMF.
BUT INCOME AND ASSETS WOULD
TEMF.
BUT INCOME AND ASSETS WOULD BE
BUT INCOME AND ASSETS WOULD BE
BUT INCOME AND ASSETS WOULD BE
REVIEWED
BUT INCOME AND ASSETS WOULD BE
REVIEWED TO
BUT INCOME AND ASSETS WOULD BE
REVIEWED TO QUALIFY
BUT INCOME AND ASSETS WOULD BE
REVIEWED TO QUALIFY FOR
BUT INCOME AND ASSETS WOULD BE
REVIEWED TO QUALIFY FOR FOOD
REVIEWED TO QUALIFY FOR FOOD
REVIEWED TO QUALIFY FOR FOOD
STAMPS.
STAMPS.
STAMPS.
>>
STAMPS.
>> IT
STAMPS.
>> IT WILL
STAMPS.
>> IT WILL LOSE
STAMPS.
>> IT WILL LOSE PEOPLE
STAMPS.
>> IT WILL LOSE PEOPLE FROM
STAMPS.
>> IT WILL LOSE PEOPLE FROM THE
>> IT WILL LOSE PEOPLE FROM THE
>> IT WILL LOSE PEOPLE FROM THE
ROLES.
ROLES.
ROLES.
IT'S
ROLES.
IT'S HARD
ROLES.
IT'S HARD TO
ROLES.
IT'S HARD TO PREDICT
ROLES.
IT'S HARD TO PREDICT THE
ROLES.
IT'S HARD TO PREDICT THE EXACT
IT'S HARD TO PREDICT THE EXACT
IT'S HARD TO PREDICT THE EXACT
IMPACT.
IMPACT.
IMPACT.
BUT
IMPACT.
BUT BECAUSE
IMPACT.
BUT BECAUSE TEXAS
IMPACT.
BUT BECAUSE TEXAS SIMPLIFIED
BUT BECAUSE TEXAS SIMPLIFIED
BUT BECAUSE TEXAS SIMPLIFIED
ITS
BUT BECAUSE TEXAS SIMPLIFIED
ITS ELIGIBILITY
BUT BECAUSE TEXAS SIMPLIFIED
ITS ELIGIBILITY PROCESS.
ITS ELIGIBILITY PROCESS.
ITS ELIGIBILITY PROCESS.
>>
ITS ELIGIBILITY PROCESS.
>> IF
ITS ELIGIBILITY PROCESS.
>> IF THE
ITS ELIGIBILITY PROCESS.
>> IF THE PROPORTIONS
ITS ELIGIBILITY PROCESS.
>> IF THE PROPORTIONS ARE
>> IF THE PROPORTIONS ARE
>> IF THE PROPORTIONS ARE
CORRECT,
>> IF THE PROPORTIONS ARE
CORRECT, THEN
>> IF THE PROPORTIONS ARE
CORRECT, THEN IT
>> IF THE PROPORTIONS ARE
CORRECT, THEN IT WILL
>> IF THE PROPORTIONS ARE
CORRECT, THEN IT WILL BE
>> IF THE PROPORTIONS ARE
CORRECT, THEN IT WILL BE PRETTY
CORRECT, THEN IT WILL BE PRETTY
CORRECT, THEN IT WILL BE PRETTY
BAD
CORRECT, THEN IT WILL BE PRETTY
BAD CONSEQUENCES
CORRECT, THEN IT WILL BE PRETTY
BAD CONSEQUENCES FOR
CORRECT, THEN IT WILL BE PRETTY
BAD CONSEQUENCES FOR TEXANS,
BAD CONSEQUENCES FOR TEXANS,
BAD CONSEQUENCES FOR TEXANS,
ESPECIALLY
BAD CONSEQUENCES FOR TEXANS,
ESPECIALLY THE
BAD CONSEQUENCES FOR TEXANS,
ESPECIALLY THE ELDERLY.
ESPECIALLY THE ELDERLY.
ESPECIALLY THE ELDERLY.
>>
ESPECIALLY THE ELDERLY.
>> Reporter:
ESPECIALLY THE ELDERLY.
>> Reporter: GREEN
ESPECIALLY THE ELDERLY.
>> Reporter: GREEN SAYS
ESPECIALLY THE ELDERLY.
>> Reporter: GREEN SAYS THE
>> Reporter: GREEN SAYS THE
>> Reporter: GREEN SAYS THE
FOOD
>> Reporter: GREEN SAYS THE
FOOD BANK
>> Reporter: GREEN SAYS THE
FOOD BANK AND
>> Reporter: GREEN SAYS THE
FOOD BANK AND ITS
>> Reporter: GREEN SAYS THE
FOOD BANK AND ITS PARTNER
FOOD BANK AND ITS PARTNER
FOOD BANK AND ITS PARTNER
RECEIVING
FOOD BANK AND ITS PARTNER
RECEIVING MORE
FOOD BANK AND ITS PARTNER
RECEIVING MORE THAN
FOOD BANK AND ITS PARTNER
RECEIVING MORE THAN 800,000
RECEIVING MORE THAN 800,000
RECEIVING MORE THAN 800,000
PEOPLE
RECEIVING MORE THAN 800,000
PEOPLE INCLUDING
RECEIVING MORE THAN 800,000
PEOPLE INCLUDING MORE
RECEIVING MORE THAN 800,000
PEOPLE INCLUDING MORE AND
RECEIVING MORE THAN 800,000
PEOPLE INCLUDING MORE AND MORE
PEOPLE INCLUDING MORE AND MORE
PEOPLE INCLUDING MORE AND MORE
WORKING
PEOPLE INCLUDING MORE AND MORE
WORKING FAMILIES
PEOPLE INCLUDING MORE AND MORE
WORKING FAMILIES ACROSS
PEOPLE INCLUDING MORE AND MORE
WORKING FAMILIES ACROSS 18
WORKING FAMILIES ACROSS 18
WORKING FAMILIES ACROSS 18
COUNTIES
WORKING FAMILIES ACROSS 18
COUNTIES EVERY
WORKING FAMILIES ACROSS 18
COUNTIES EVERY YEAR.
COUNTIES EVERY YEAR.
COUNTIES EVERY YEAR.
STILL
COUNTIES EVERY YEAR.
STILL HE
COUNTIES EVERY YEAR.
STILL HE SAYS
COUNTIES EVERY YEAR.
STILL HE SAYS SNAP'S
COUNTIES EVERY YEAR.
STILL HE SAYS SNAP'S IMPACT
COUNTIES EVERY YEAR.
STILL HE SAYS SNAP'S IMPACT IS
STILL HE SAYS SNAP'S IMPACT IS
STILL HE SAYS SNAP'S IMPACT IS
MUCH
STILL HE SAYS SNAP'S IMPACT IS
MUCH LARGER.
MUCH LARGER.
MUCH LARGER.
AND
MUCH LARGER.
AND HE
MUCH LARGER.
AND HE AND
MUCH LARGER.
AND HE AND OTHER
MUCH LARGER.
AND HE AND OTHER LOCAL
MUCH LARGER.
AND HE AND OTHER LOCAL PANTRIES
AND HE AND OTHER LOCAL PANTRIES
AND HE AND OTHER LOCAL PANTRIES
DON'T
AND HE AND OTHER LOCAL PANTRIES
DON'T HAVE
AND HE AND OTHER LOCAL PANTRIES
DON'T HAVE THE
AND HE AND OTHER LOCAL PANTRIES
DON'T HAVE THE RESOURCES
AND HE AND OTHER LOCAL PANTRIES
DON'T HAVE THE RESOURCES EVEN
DON'T HAVE THE RESOURCES EVEN
DON'T HAVE THE RESOURCES EVEN
COMBINED
DON'T HAVE THE RESOURCES EVEN
COMBINED TO
DON'T HAVE THE RESOURCES EVEN
COMBINED TO MAKE
DON'T HAVE THE RESOURCES EVEN
COMBINED TO MAKE UP
DON'T HAVE THE RESOURCES EVEN
COMBINED TO MAKE UP THE
COMBINED TO MAKE UP THE
COMBINED TO MAKE UP THE
DIFFERENCE.
DIFFERENCE.
DIFFERENCE.
>>
DIFFERENCE.
>> AND
DIFFERENCE.
>> AND THE
DIFFERENCE.
>> AND THE MAIN
DIFFERENCE.
>> AND THE MAIN PEOPLE
DIFFERENCE.
>> AND THE MAIN PEOPLE HURT
DIFFERENCE.
>> AND THE MAIN PEOPLE HURT IS
>> AND THE MAIN PEOPLE HURT IS
>> AND THE MAIN PEOPLE HURT IS
NOT
>> AND THE MAIN PEOPLE HURT IS
NOT THE
>> AND THE MAIN PEOPLE HURT IS
NOT THE ORGANIZATION
>> AND THE MAIN PEOPLE HURT IS
NOT THE ORGANIZATION TRYING
>> AND THE MAIN PEOPLE HURT IS
NOT THE ORGANIZATION TRYING TO
NOT THE ORGANIZATION TRYING TO
NOT THE ORGANIZATION TRYING TO
HELP
NOT THE ORGANIZATION TRYING TO
HELP THEM,
NOT THE ORGANIZATION TRYING TO
HELP THEM, BUT
NOT THE ORGANIZATION TRYING TO
HELP THEM, BUT THE
NOT THE ORGANIZATION TRYING TO
HELP THEM, BUT THE PEOPLE
NOT THE ORGANIZATION TRYING TO
HELP THEM, BUT THE PEOPLE NO
HELP THEM, BUT THE PEOPLE NO
HELP THEM, BUT THE PEOPLE NO
LONGER
HELP THEM, BUT THE PEOPLE NO
LONGER TO
HELP THEM, BUT THE PEOPLE NO
LONGER TO RECEIVE
HELP THEM, BUT THE PEOPLE NO
LONGER TO RECEIVE THE
HELP THEM, BUT THE PEOPLE NO
LONGER TO RECEIVE THE BENEFITS.
LONGER TO RECEIVE THE BENEFITS.
LONGER TO RECEIVE THE BENEFITS.
>>
LONGER TO RECEIVE THE BENEFITS.
>> Reporter:
LONGER TO RECEIVE THE BENEFITS.
>> Reporter: AND
LONGER TO RECEIVE THE BENEFITS.
>> Reporter: AND NOW
LONGER TO RECEIVE THE BENEFITS.
>> Reporter: AND NOW TODAY
LONGER TO RECEIVE THE BENEFITS.
>> Reporter: AND NOW TODAY THE
>> Reporter: AND NOW TODAY THE
>> Reporter: AND NOW TODAY THE
AGRICULTURE
>> Reporter: AND NOW TODAY THE
AGRICULTURE SECRETARY
>> Reporter: AND NOW TODAY THE
AGRICULTURE SECRETARY SAID
>> Reporter: AND NOW TODAY THE
AGRICULTURE SECRETARY SAID HE
AGRICULTURE SECRETARY SAID HE
AGRICULTURE SECRETARY SAID HE
THINKS
AGRICULTURE SECRETARY SAID HE
THINKS THE
AGRICULTURE SECRETARY SAID HE
THINKS THE CURRENT
AGRICULTURE SECRETARY SAID HE
THINKS THE CURRENT RULES
AGRICULTURE SECRETARY SAID HE
THINKS THE CURRENT RULES CREATE
THINKS THE CURRENT RULES CREATE
THINKS THE CURRENT RULES CREATE
A
THINKS THE CURRENT RULES CREATE
A LOOPHOLE
THINKS THE CURRENT RULES CREATE
A LOOPHOLE ALLOWING
THINKS THE CURRENT RULES CREATE
A LOOPHOLE ALLOWING PEOPLE
THINKS THE CURRENT RULES CREATE
A LOOPHOLE ALLOWING PEOPLE TO
A LOOPHOLE ALLOWING PEOPLE TO
A LOOPHOLE ALLOWING PEOPLE TO
BYPASS
A LOOPHOLE ALLOWING PEOPLE TO
BYPASS IMPORTANT
A LOOPHOLE ALLOWING PEOPLE TO
BYPASS IMPORTANT ELIGIBILITY
BYPASS IMPORTANT ELIGIBILITY
BYPASS IMPORTANT ELIGIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS.
REQUIREMENTS.
REQUIREMENTS.
THE
REQUIREMENTS.
THE PUBLIC
REQUIREMENTS.
THE PUBLIC WILL
REQUIREMENTS.
THE PUBLIC WILL HAVE
REQUIREMENTS.
THE PUBLIC WILL HAVE 60
REQUIREMENTS.
THE PUBLIC WILL HAVE 60 DAYS
REQUIREMENTS.
THE PUBLIC WILL HAVE 60 DAYS TO
THE PUBLIC WILL HAVE 60 DAYS TO
THE PUBLIC WILL HAVE 60 DAYS TO
EXCEPT
THE PUBLIC WILL HAVE 60 DAYS TO
EXCEPT ON
THE PUBLIC WILL HAVE 60 DAYS TO
EXCEPT ON THIS
THE PUBLIC WILL HAVE 60 DAYS TO
EXCEPT ON THIS PROPOSED
