AS EARLY AS TOMORROW. SO THERE IS A LOT GOING ON.
SO THERE IS A LOT GOING ON. STAY BY YOUR TV.
STAY BY YOUR TV. WE’RE GOING TO START TONIGHT,
WE’RE GOING TO START TONIGHT, THOUGH, WITH THE ATTORNEY
THOUGH, WITH THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES TODAY MAKING AN UNUSUAL
TODAY MAKING AN UNUSUAL DECISION.
DECISION. TODAY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
TODAY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DECIDED TO THROW A BIG CAN OF
DECIDED TO THROW A BIG CAN OF GASOLINE ON TO THE ALWAYS
GASOLINE ON TO THE ALWAYS SMOLDERING FIRES OF TRUMP WORLD
SMOLDERING FIRES OF TRUMP WORLD CONSPIRACY THEORIES ABOUT THE
CONSPIRACY THEORIES ABOUT THE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION AND ROBERT
RUSSIA INVESTIGATION AND ROBERT MUELLER.
MUELLER. >> NEWS JUST BROKE TODAY THAT
>> NEWS JUST BROKE TODAY THAT YOU HAVE A SPECIAL TEAM LOOKING
YOU HAVE A SPECIAL TEAM LOOKING INTO WHY THE FBI OPENED AN
INTO WHY THE FBI OPENED AN INVESTIGATION INTO RUSSIAN
INVESTIGATION INTO RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN THE 2016
INTERFERENCE IN THE 2016 ELECTIONS.
ELECTIONS. CAN YOU SHARE WITH US WHY YOU
CAN YOU SHARE WITH US WHY YOU FEEL A NEED TO DO THAT?
FEEL A NEED TO DO THAT? >> I THINK SPYING ON A POLITICAL
>> I THINK SPYING ON A POLITICAL CAMPAIGN IS A BIG DEAL.
CAMPAIGN IS A BIG DEAL. IT’S A BIG DEAL.
IT’S A BIG DEAL. THE GENERATION I GREW UP IN,
THE GENERATION I GREW UP IN, WHICH IS THE VIETNAM WAR PERIOD,
WHICH IS THE VIETNAM WAR PERIOD, PEOPLE WERE ALL CONCERNED ABOUT
PEOPLE WERE ALL CONCERNED ABOUT SPYING ON ANTI-WAR PEOPLE AND SO
SPYING ON ANTI-WAR PEOPLE AND SO FORTH BY THE GOVERNMENT.
FORTH BY THE GOVERNMENT. AND THERE WERE A LOT OF RULES
AND THERE WERE A LOT OF RULES PUT IN PLACE TO MAKE SURE THAT
PUT IN PLACE TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE IS AN ADEQUATE BASIS
THERE IS AN ADEQUATE BASIS BEFORE OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT
BEFORE OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES GET INVOLVED IN
AGENCIES GET INVOLVED IN POLITICAL SURVEILLANCE.
POLITICAL SURVEILLANCE. I’M NOT SUGGESTING THAT THOSE
I’M NOT SUGGESTING THAT THOSE RULES WERE VIOLATED, BUT I THINK
RULES WERE VIOLATED, BUT I THINK IT’S IMPORTANT TO LOOK AT THAT.
IT’S IMPORTANT TO LOOK AT THAT. AND I’M NOT JUST -- I’M NOT
AND I’M NOT JUST -- I’M NOT TALKING ABOUT THE FBI
TALKING ABOUT THE FBI NECESSARILY, BUT INTELLIGENCE
NECESSARILY, BUT INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES MORE BROADLY.
AGENCIES MORE BROADLY. >> SO YOU’RE NOT -- YOU’RE NOT
>> SO YOU’RE NOT -- YOU’RE NOT SUGGESTING, THOUGH, THAT SPYING
SUGGESTING, THOUGH, THAT SPYING OCCURRED?
OCCURRED? >> I DON’T -- WELL, I GUESS YOU
>> I DON’T -- WELL, I GUESS YOU COULD -- I THINK THERE SPYING
COULD -- I THINK THERE SPYING DID OCCUR, YES.
DID OCCUR, YES. I THINK SPYING DID OCCUR.
I THINK SPYING DID OCCUR. >> ARE YOU SURE YOU WANT TO SAY
>> ARE YOU SURE YOU WANT TO SAY THAT?
THAT? DO YOU KNOW EXACTLY WHAT YOU
DO YOU KNOW EXACTLY WHAT YOU MEAN TO SAY HERE?
MEAN TO SAY HERE? DO YOU WANT TO THINK ABOUT IT?
DO YOU WANT TO THINK ABOUT IT? IT MAY BE THAT ATTORNEY GENERAL
IT MAY BE THAT ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR IS JUST, YOU KNOW,
WILLIAM BARR IS JUST, YOU KNOW, HE IS CURIOUS.
HE IS CURIOUS. HE IS A CURIOUS GUY.
HE IS A CURIOUS GUY. HE WANTS TO ASK QUESTIONS.
HE WANTS TO ASK QUESTIONS. HE IS RECENTLY APPOINTED.
HE IS RECENTLY APPOINTED. HE HAS ONLY BEEN THERE SEVEN
HE HAS ONLY BEEN THERE SEVEN WEEKS.
WEEKS. YOU TAKE A NEW JOB.
YOU TAKE A NEW JOB. YOU WANT TO BE THOROUGH, RIGHT?
YOU WANT TO BE THOROUGH, RIGHT? I’M NOT SUGGESTING ANY RULES
I’M NOT SUGGESTING ANY RULES WERE VIOLATED, BUT SPYING ON A
WERE VIOLATED, BUT SPYING ON A POLITICAL CAMPAIGN, THAT WOULD
POLITICAL CAMPAIGN, THAT WOULD BE A HUGE DEAL.
BE A HUGE DEAL. DID SPYING HAPPEN?
DID SPYING HAPPEN? AH, WELL, I MEAN, YOU KNOW, DID
AH, WELL, I MEAN, YOU KNOW, DID ANYTHING EVER COME OF THAT WHOLE
ANYTHING EVER COME OF THAT WHOLE YEAR PLUS LONG EFFORT BY THE
YEAR PLUS LONG EFFORT BY THE PRESIDENT TO SAY THAT MAYBE THE
PRESIDENT TO SAY THAT MAYBE THE FBI INVESTIGATION INTO RUSSIAN
FBI INVESTIGATION INTO RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN THE ELECTIONS
INTERFERENCE IN THE ELECTIONS WAS JUST ONE BIG HOAX?
WAS JUST ONE BIG HOAX? IT WAS JUST MADE UP.
IT WAS JUST MADE UP. WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THAT CLAIM.
WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THAT CLAIM. ARE WE STILL TRYING TO SAY THAT
ARE WE STILL TRYING TO SAY THAT WITH OBAMA TAPPING HIS WIRES AND
WITH OBAMA TAPPING HIS WIRES AND ALL THAT?
ALL THAT? ARE WE STILL SAYING THAT?
ARE WE STILL SAYING THAT? IS THAT STILL THE LINE WE’RE
IS THAT STILL THE LINE WE’RE WORKING?
WORKING? JUST CURIOUS.
JUST CURIOUS. SHOULD WE CHASE THAT DOWN?
SHOULD WE CHASE THAT DOWN? I MEAN, WHEN THE ATTORNEY
I MEAN, WHEN THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES GOES BEFORE CONGRESS AND SAYS
GOES BEFORE CONGRESS AND SAYS THERE WAS SPYING ON THE TRUMP
THERE WAS SPYING ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN, THAT’S NOT A DOG
CAMPAIGN, THAT’S NOT A DOG WHISTLE TO THE PRESIDENT AND HIS
WHISTLE TO THE PRESIDENT AND HIS ALLIES ABOUT THE THOROUGHLY
ALLIES ABOUT THE THOROUGHLY DEBUNKED CONSPIRACY THEORIES
DEBUNKED CONSPIRACY THEORIES ABOUT ROBERT MUELLER AND SPYING
ABOUT ROBERT MUELLER AND SPYING AND PRESIDENT OBAMA HAVING
AND PRESIDENT OBAMA HAVING WIRETAPS.
WIRETAPS. THAT’S NOT A DOG WHISTLE.
THAT’S NOT A DOG WHISTLE. THAT’S AN AIR HORN.
THAT’S AN AIR HORN. AND WHATEVER REASON ATTORNEY
AND WHATEVER REASON ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR DECIDED TO
GENERAL WILLIAM BARR DECIDED TO BLOW THAT AIR HORN TODAY, IT’S
BLOW THAT AIR HORN TODAY, IT’S INTERESTING.
INTERESTING. IT COMES ON THE SAME DAY THAT WE
IT COMES ON THE SAME DAY THAT WE GOT FRESH EVIDENCE OF HOW AND
GOT FRESH EVIDENCE OF HOW AND WHY THE INVESTIGATION INTO
WHY THE INVESTIGATION INTO RUSSIA AND THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN
RUSSIA AND THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN REALLY DID BEGIN IN 2016.
REALLY DID BEGIN IN 2016. AND SPECIFICALLY, HOW ALARMED
AND SPECIFICALLY, HOW ALARMED THE COUNTRY’S TOP NATIONAL
THE COUNTRY’S TOP NATIONAL SECURITY OFFICIALS WERE AT THE
SECURITY OFFICIALS WERE AT THE INTELLIGENCE THEY WERE SEEING
INTELLIGENCE THEY WERE SEEING AND THE EVIDENCE THEY WERE
AND THE EVIDENCE THEY WERE SEEING AND HOW SERIOUSLY THEY
SEEING AND HOW SERIOUSLY THEY TOOK THEIR OBLIGATION TO LOOK
TOOK THEIR OBLIGATION TO LOOK INTO IT.
INTO IT. BECAUSE ALL THIS HAPPENED TODAY
BECAUSE ALL THIS HAPPENED TODAY WITH THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ON THE
WITH THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ON THE SAME DAY THAT WE GOT A NEW
SAME DAY THAT WE GOT A NEW TRANSCRIPT OF ANOTHER DAY OF
TRANSCRIPT OF ANOTHER DAY OF TESTIMONY THAT THE FBI’S GENERAL
TESTIMONY THAT THE FBI’S GENERAL COUNSEL GAVE TO CONGRESS BEHIND
COUNSEL GAVE TO CONGRESS BEHIND CLOSED DOORS LAST OCTOBER.
CLOSED DOORS LAST OCTOBER. THIS IS TESTIMONY THAT’S NEVER
THIS IS TESTIMONY THAT’S NEVER BEFORE SEEN THE LIGHT OF DAY.
BEFORE SEEN THE LIGHT OF DAY. IT WAS -- NOT UNSEALED.
IT WAS -- NOT UNSEALED. IT WAS RELEASED TODAY BY
IT WAS RELEASED TODAY BY REPUBLICAN MEMBERS OF THE
REPUBLICAN MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE.
COMMITTEE. JAMES BAKER WAS THE FBI’S
JAMES BAKER WAS THE FBI’S GENERAL COUNSEL IN THE SUMMER OF
GENERAL COUNSEL IN THE SUMMER OF 2016 WHEN THE
2016 WHEN THE COUNTERINTELLIGENCE
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE INVESTIGATION BEGAN INTO ANY
INVESTIGATION BEGAN INTO ANY POTENTIAL LINKS BETWEEN THE
POTENTIAL LINKS BETWEEN THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND RUSSIA
TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND RUSSIA INTERFERING IN THE ELECTION.
INTERFERING IN THE ELECTION. HERE’S HOW JAMES BAKER DESCRIBES
HERE’S HOW JAMES BAKER DESCRIBES THE BEGINNING OF THE
THE BEGINNING OF THE INVESTIGATION.
INVESTIGATION. AGAIN, THIS TRANSCRIPT JUST
AGAIN, THIS TRANSCRIPT JUST RELEASED TO THE PUBLIC FOR THE
RELEASED TO THE PUBLIC FOR THE FIRST TIME TODAY.
FIRST TIME TODAY. QUOTE, WE WERE CONCERNED THAT
QUOTE, WE WERE CONCERNED THAT THE RUSSIANS WERE ENGAGED IN AN
THE RUSSIANS WERE ENGAGED IN AN EFFORT TO TRY TO IMPACT OUR
EFFORT TO TRY TO IMPACT OUR ELECTIONS, THAT PARTICULAR
ELECTIONS, THAT PARTICULAR ELECTION.
ELECTION. AND WE WERE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT
AND WE WERE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT EXACTLY WHAT THEY WERE DOING AND
EXACTLY WHAT THEY WERE DOING AND HOW THEY WERE DOING IT.
HOW THEY WERE DOING IT. QUESTION, WELL, WAS THE CASE A
QUESTION, WELL, WAS THE CASE A PRIORITY FOR THE FBI?
PRIORITY FOR THE FBI? JAMES BAKER, YES.
JAMES BAKER, YES. QUESTION, DID YOU THINK THAT WAS
QUESTION, DID YOU THINK THAT WAS THE RIGHT DECISION?
THE RIGHT DECISION? BAKER, YES.
BAKER, YES. QUESTION, WHY?
QUESTION, WHY? >>
>> BAKER, BECAUSE IF THE RUSSIANS
BAKER, BECAUSE IF THE RUSSIANS WERE TRYING TO INFLUENCE
WERE TRYING TO INFLUENCE SOMETHING AS FUNDAMENTAL AS A
SOMETHING AS FUNDAMENTAL AS A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, I THOUGHT
PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, I THOUGHT THAT WOULD BE A PARTICULAR
THAT WOULD BE A PARTICULAR THREAT TO THE COUNTRY, BECAUSE
THREAT TO THE COUNTRY, BECAUSE SO MUCH OF OUR SYSTEM DEPENDS ON
SO MUCH OF OUR SYSTEM DEPENDS ON THE INTEGRITY OF OUR ELECTIONS.
THE INTEGRITY OF OUR ELECTIONS. SO MUCH OF OUR CONSTITUTION
SO MUCH OF OUR CONSTITUTION SYSTEM DEPENDS ON THE INTEGRITY
SYSTEM DEPENDS ON THE INTEGRITY OF THE ELECTIONS.
OF THE ELECTIONS. QUESTION, WOULD THAT THREAT TO
QUESTION, WOULD THAT THREAT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY INCREASE
THE NATIONAL SECURITY INCREASE IF THE PRESIDENT WAS ELECT AND
IF THE PRESIDENT WAS ELECT AND THEREFORE OBTAINED CLASSIFIED
THEREFORE OBTAINED CLASSIFIED BRIEFINGS AND WAS EXPOSED TO THE
BRIEFINGS AND WAS EXPOSED TO THE NATION’S MOST SECRETIVE SECRETS
NATION’S MOST SECRETIVE SECRETS IF THERE WAS SOMEONE -- IF HE OR
IF THERE WAS SOMEONE -- IF HE OR SOMEONE WITHIN HIS CAMPAIGN HAD
SOMEONE WITHIN HIS CAMPAIGN HAD BEEN IN FACT WORKING WITH THE
BEEN IN FACT WORKING WITH THE RUSSIANS?
RUSSIANS? ANSWER, FROM JIM BAKER.
ANSWER, FROM JIM BAKER. >> LET ME ANSWER THAT GENERALLY.
>> LET ME ANSWER THAT GENERALLY. I THINK WE WOULD -- I THINK WE
I THINK WE WOULD -- I THINK WE WOULD -- I THINK WE WERE
WOULD -- I THINK WE WERE CONCERNED ABOUT ANYONE WHO MIGHT
CONCERNED ABOUT ANYONE WHO MIGHT ENTER GOVERNMENT AND BE IN A
ENTER GOVERNMENT AND BE IN A POSITION TO HAVE ACCESS TO
POSITION TO HAVE ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED OR SENSITIVE
CLASSIFIED OR SENSITIVE INFORMATION WHO MIGHT PROVIDE
INFORMATION WHO MIGHT PROVIDE THAT TO A FOREIGN POWER.
THAT TO A FOREIGN POWER. QUESTION, HOW SERIOUS WOULD THAT
QUESTION, HOW SERIOUS WOULD THAT CONCERN BE?
CONCERN BE? JAMES BAKER, EXTREMELY SERIOUS.
JAMES BAKER, EXTREMELY SERIOUS. YOU KNOW, WITH REMARKABLE
YOU KNOW, WITH REMARKABLE CONSISTENCY EVERY TIME WE GET
CONSISTENCY EVERY TIME WE GET ONE OF THESE TRANSCRIPTS FROM A
ONE OF THESE TRANSCRIPTS FROM A SENIOR FBI OFFICIAL, SENIOR
SENIOR FBI OFFICIAL, SENIOR JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL,
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL, SENIOR NATIONAL SECURITY
SENIOR NATIONAL SECURITY OFFICIAL WHO IS AT ALL INVOLVED
OFFICIAL WHO IS AT ALL INVOLVED IN THIS INVESTIGATION, THEY
IN THIS INVESTIGATION, THEY DESCRIBE THEIR WORK IN 2016 IN
DESCRIBE THEIR WORK IN 2016 IN THESE VERY SIMPLE TERMS.
THESE VERY SIMPLE TERMS. THEY SAW SIGNS OF THE RUSSIAN
THEY SAW SIGNS OF THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT INTERFERING TO TRY TO
GOVERNMENT INTERFERING TO TRY TO INFLUENCE OUR ELECTION, AND THEY
INFLUENCE OUR ELECTION, AND THEY SAW ALL THESE UNEXPLAINED
SAW ALL THESE UNEXPLAINED CONTACTS BETWEEN RUSSIANS AND
CONTACTS BETWEEN RUSSIANS AND THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN, AND THEY
THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN, AND THEY WERE CONCERNED ABOUT THE
WERE CONCERNED ABOUT THE IMPLICATIONS OF THAT.
IMPLICATIONS OF THAT. THEY WERE CONCERNED THAT THE
THEY WERE CONCERNED THAT THE COUNTRY AND THEREFORE THE TRUMP
COUNTRY AND THEREFORE THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN ITSELF, THEY WERE
CAMPAIGN ITSELF, THEY WERE CONCERNED THAT THE CAMPAIGN
CONCERNED THAT THE CAMPAIGN SHOULD BE PROTECTED FROM
SHOULD BE PROTECTED FROM WHATEVER WAS GOING ON.
WHATEVER WAS GOING ON. I MEAN, WEIRDLY, IT IS THE
I MEAN, WEIRDLY, IT IS THE REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS WHO HAVE
REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS WHO HAVE BEEN UNILATERALLY RELEASING
BEEN UNILATERALLY RELEASING THESE TRANSCRIPTS OVER THE PAST
THESE TRANSCRIPTS OVER THE PAST FEW WEEKS.
FEW WEEKS. I DON’T KNOW WHAT SMOKING GUN
I DON’T KNOW WHAT SMOKING GUN THEY EXPECT US TO FIND HERE.
THEY EXPECT US TO FIND HERE. I MEAN, NOBODY IN THESE
I MEAN, NOBODY IN THESE INTERVIEWS HAS EVEN HINTED AT
INTERVIEWS HAS EVEN HINTED AT THE POSSIBILITY THAT THERE WAS
THE POSSIBILITY THAT THERE WAS ANY POLITICALLY MOTIVATED SPYING
ANY POLITICALLY MOTIVATED SPYING ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN.
ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN. BUT YOU KNOW WHAT?
BUT YOU KNOW WHAT? MAYBE IT WASN’T THE FBI.
MAYBE IT WASN’T THE FBI. ONE OF THE ODD THINGS ABOUT THE
ONE OF THE ODD THINGS ABOUT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S TESTIMONY
ATTORNEY GENERAL’S TESTIMONY TODAY IS THAT EVEN AS HE SAID HE
TODAY IS THAT EVEN AS HE SAID HE BELIEVED SPYING ON THE TRUMP
BELIEVED SPYING ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN DID OCCUR, HE KEPT
CAMPAIGN DID OCCUR, HE KEPT GOING OUT OF HIS WAY TO SAY HE
GOING OUT OF HIS WAY TO SAY HE WAS NOT NECESSARILY TALKING
WAS NOT NECESSARILY TALKING ABOUT THE FBI DOING THAT SPYING.
ABOUT THE FBI DOING THAT SPYING. HE WAS TALKING ABOUT THE
HE WAS TALKING ABOUT THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY MORE
INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY MORE BROADLY.
BROADLY. OKAY.
OKAY. WHAT COULD HE MEAN?
WHAT COULD HE MEAN? IF HE IS TALKING ABOUT THE FBI
IF HE IS TALKING ABOUT THE FBI AND THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT,
AND THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, HONESTLY, THE FBI AND THE
HONESTLY, THE FBI AND THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT ARE ON THE
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT ARE ON THE RECORD OVER AND OVER AGAIN
RECORD OVER AND OVER AGAIN SAYING NO, THEY DIDN’T DO ANY
SAYING NO, THEY DIDN’T DO ANY SPYING ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN,
SPYING ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN, AND NOBODY HAS YET FOUND ANY
AND NOBODY HAS YET FOUND ANY EVIDENCE TO CALL THAT INTO
EVIDENCE TO CALL THAT INTO QUESTION.
QUESTION. IF BARR IS TALKING ABOUT AS
IF BARR IS TALKING ABOUT AS ATTORNEY GENERAL HE IS GOING TO
ATTORNEY GENERAL HE IS GOING TO INVESTIGATE THE INTELLIGENCE
INVESTIGATE THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY INSTEAD, THAT’S A
COMMUNITY INSTEAD, THAT’S A LITTLE WEIRD.
LITTLE WEIRD. IT’S A LITTLE OFF, BUT OKAY.
IT’S A LITTLE OFF, BUT OKAY. MAYBE THAT’S WHAT HE IS DOING.
MAYBE THAT’S WHAT HE IS DOING. THAT SAID, MARK WARNER WHO IS
THAT SAID, MARK WARNER WHO IS THE RANKING MEMBER ON THE SENATE
THE RANKING MEMBER ON THE SENATE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE, THE
INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE, THE COMMITTEE THAT OVERSEES THE
COMMITTEE THAT OVERSEES THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY, AND HE
INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY, AND HE HAS BEEN THAT FOR A LONG TIME,
HAS BEEN THAT FOR A LONG TIME, MARK WARNER TODAY IN RESPONSE TO
MARK WARNER TODAY IN RESPONSE TO THESE COMMENTS FROM THE ATTORNEY
THESE COMMENTS FROM THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SAYS NOPE, HE WOULD KNOW
GENERAL SAYS NOPE, HE WOULD KNOW AS THE TOP DEMOCRAT ON THE
AS THE TOP DEMOCRAT ON THE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE.
INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE. AND IT WASN’T THE INTELLIGENCE
AND IT WASN’T THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY SPYING ON THE TRUMP
COMMUNITY SPYING ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN EITHER.
CAMPAIGN EITHER. IT DIDN’T HAPPEN.
IT DIDN’T HAPPEN. >> I’M FLABBERGASTED BY THE
>> I’M FLABBERGASTED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S COMMENTS.
ATTORNEY GENERAL’S COMMENTS. I DON’T GET IT.
I DON’T GET IT. IS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
IS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL QUESTIONING WHETHER RUSSIA
QUESTIONING WHETHER RUSSIA INTERVENED?
INTERVENED? IS HE QUESTIONING WHETHER RUSSIA
IS HE QUESTIONING WHETHER RUSSIA INTERVENED IN THE CAMPAIGN ON
INTERVENED IN THE CAMPAIGN ON BEHALF OF TRUMP AND AGAINST
BEHALF OF TRUMP AND AGAINST CLINTON, THINGS THAT THE
CLINTON, THINGS THAT THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY HAS
INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY HAS UNANIMOUSLY GRID UPON?
UNANIMOUSLY GRID UPON? IS HE SOMEHOW SAYING THAT THE
IS HE SOMEHOW SAYING THAT THE FBI AND THE DEPARTMENT OF
FBI AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE SHOULDN’T HAVE STARTED A
JUSTICE SHOULDN’T HAVE STARTED A COUNTERINTELLIGENCE
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE INVESTIGATION?
INVESTIGATION? REMEMBER BACK IN THE SUMMER AND
REMEMBER BACK IN THE SUMMER AND FALL OF 2016, THE INTELLIGENCE
FALL OF 2016, THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY BROUGHT THIS
COMMUNITY BROUGHT THIS INFORMATION TO THE FULL GANG OF
INFORMATION TO THE FULL GANG OF EIGHT IN AN EFFORT TO TRY TO
EIGHT IN AN EFFORT TO TRY TO WARN THE AMERICAN PUBLIC ABOUT
WARN THE AMERICAN PUBLIC ABOUT WHAT RUSSIA WAS DOING THIS.
WHAT RUSSIA WAS DOING THIS. HE IS SAYING THE INTELLIGENCE
HE IS SAYING THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY SHOULD HAVE SAT ON
COMMUNITY SHOULD HAVE SAT ON THAT INFORMATION?
THAT INFORMATION? I THINK THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S
I THINK THE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S COMMENTS TODAY DO A GREAT
COMMENTS TODAY DO A GREAT DISSERVICE TO THE MEN AND WOMEN
DISSERVICE TO THE MEN AND WOMEN AT THE FBI AND THE DEPARTMENT OF
AT THE FBI AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WHO I THINK BACK IN 2016
JUSTICE WHO I THINK BACK IN 2016 WERE JUST DOING THEIR JOB, BUT
WERE JUST DOING THEIR JOB, BUT WHAT I FEEL IS THIS MAN WITH
WHAT I FEEL IS THIS MAN WITH THIS MUCH EXPERIENCE WHO IS
THIS MUCH EXPERIENCE WHO IS USING THESE PARTISAN TALKING
USING THESE PARTISAN TALKING POINTS FROM SOME OF THE FAR
POINTS FROM SOME OF THE FAR RIGHT THAT HAD BEEN, FRANKLY,
RIGHT THAT HAD BEEN, FRANKLY, INVESTIGATED AND LITIGATED A
INVESTIGATED AND LITIGATED A HALF DOZEN TIMES ALREADY, I
HALF DOZEN TIMES ALREADY, I DON’T GET IT.
DON’T GET IT. >> HAVE YOU EVER SEEN -- YOU’VE
>> HAVE YOU EVER SEEN -- YOU’VE DELVED INTO THIS SUBJECT
DELVED INTO THIS SUBJECT PARTICULARLY.
PARTICULARLY. >> WE HAVE REVIEWED THIS
>> WE HAVE REVIEWED THIS EXTENSIVELY.
EXTENSIVELY. THE WHOLE BASIS, THE FIRST PART
THE WHOLE BASIS, THE FIRST PART OF OUR BIPARTISAN SENATE
OF OUR BIPARTISAN SENATE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE
INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE INVESTIGATION WAS LOOKING AT
INVESTIGATION WAS LOOKING AT WHAT THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY
WHAT THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY DID IN TERMS OF MAKING THEIR
DID IN TERMS OF MAKING THEIR FINDINGS THAT RUSSIA INTERVENED,
FINDINGS THAT RUSSIA INTERVENED, AND THEY DID IT ON BEHALF OF ONE
AND THEY DID IT ON BEHALF OF ONE CANDIDATE, DONALD TRUMP AGAINST
CANDIDATE, DONALD TRUMP AGAINST ANOTHER ONE, HILLARY CLINTON.
ANOTHER ONE, HILLARY CLINTON. NOBODY HAS QUESTIONED THAT.
NOBODY HAS QUESTIONED THAT. >> WE HAVE REVIEWED THIS
>> WE HAVE REVIEWED THIS EXTENSIVELY.
EXTENSIVELY. THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY WAS
THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY WAS NOT SPYING ON THE TRUMP
NOT SPYING ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN.
CAMPAIGN. THEY WERE INVESTIGATING RUSSIAN
THEY WERE INVESTIGATING RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE.
INTERFERENCE. THE FBI AND DOJ WERE NOT SPYING
THE FBI AND DOJ WERE NOT SPYING ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN.
ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN. SO WHAT IS BILL BARR TALKING
SO WHAT IS BILL BARR TALKING ABOUT WHEN HE SAYS YEAH, I THINK
ABOUT WHEN HE SAYS YEAH, I THINK THERE WAS SPYING ON THE TRUMP
THERE WAS SPYING ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN.
CAMPAIGN. I MEAN, I’M ASSUMING THAT HE
I MEAN, I’M ASSUMING THAT HE DIDN’T JUST, YOU KNOW, MAKE THAT
DIDN’T JUST, YOU KNOW, MAKE THAT UP.
UP. LIKE I HEARD SOMEBODY TALKING
LIKE I HEARD SOMEBODY TALKING THAN ON "FOX &amp; FRIENDS," DIDN’T
THAN ON "FOX &amp; FRIENDS," DIDN’T I?
I? YEAH, DIDN’T THAT HAPPEN?
YEAH, DIDN’T THAT HAPPEN? I’M ASSUMING THIS IS BASED ON
I’M ASSUMING THIS IS BASED ON SOMETHING.
SOMETHING. TO GIVE THEM THE BENEFIT OF THE
TO GIVE THEM THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT, CONCEIVABLY MAYBE HE IS
DOUBT, CONCEIVABLY MAYBE HE IS TALKING ABOUT FOREIGN
TALKING ABOUT FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SERVICES DOING THE
INTELLIGENCE SERVICES DOING THE SPYING?
SPYING? I MEAN, WE DO KNOW IT HAS BEEN
I MEAN, WE DO KNOW IT HAS BEEN REPORTED THAT THERE WAS
REPORTED THAT THERE WAS INTELLIGENCE THAT OUR FOREIGN
INTELLIGENCE THAT OUR FOREIGN ALLIES SHARED WITH THEIR U.S.
ALLIES SHARED WITH THEIR U.S. COUNTERPARTS ONCE THEY
COUNTERPARTS ONCE THEY ENCOUNTERED CONTACTS BETWEEN THE
ENCOUNTERED CONTACTS BETWEEN THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND RUSSIANS.
TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND RUSSIANS. THERE HAS BEEN PRETTY ROBUST
THERE HAS BEEN PRETTY ROBUST REPORTING THAT FOREIGN
REPORTING THAT FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES PICKED UP
INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES PICKED UP ON A NUMBER OF OCCASIONS TRUMP
ON A NUMBER OF OCCASIONS TRUMP ASSOCIATES ON THEIR INTELLIGENCE
ASSOCIATES ON THEIR INTELLIGENCE INTERCEPTS IN 2015 AND 2016.
INTERCEPTS IN 2015 AND 2016. THE PROBLEM WITH THAT, AS FAR AS
THE PROBLEM WITH THAT, AS FAR AS THIS SPYING ON THE TRUMP
THIS SPYING ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN THEORY GOES IS THAT
CAMPAIGN THEORY GOES IS THAT THOSE FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE
THOSE FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES WEREN’T LIKE RUNNING A
AGENCIES WEREN’T LIKE RUNNING A LONG-TIME SURVEILLANCE OPERATION
LONG-TIME SURVEILLANCE OPERATION ON MICHAEL COHEN OR ON X OR Y
ON MICHAEL COHEN OR ON X OR Y TRUMP ASSOCIATE.
TRUMP ASSOCIATE. AS FAR AS WE CAN TELL, THE
AS FAR AS WE CAN TELL, THE REASON THAT ALL THOSE TRUMP
REASON THAT ALL THOSE TRUMP ASSOCIATES TURNED UP ON FOREIGN
ASSOCIATES TURNED UP ON FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE INTERCEPTS IS
INTELLIGENCE INTERCEPTS IS BECAUSE THOSE FOREIGN
BECAUSE THOSE FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES WERE
INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES WERE WATCHING THE RUSSIANS.
WATCHING THE RUSSIANS. LIKE THEY DO.
LIKE THEY DO. THAT’S WHAT WESTERN INTELLIGENCE
THAT’S WHAT WESTERN INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES DO.
AGENCIES DO. AND WHILE THEY’RE WATCHING THE
AND WHILE THEY’RE WATCHING THE RUSSIANS, ALL THESE TRUMP
RUSSIANS, ALL THESE TRUMP ASSOCIATES AND PEOPLE CLOSE TO
ASSOCIATES AND PEOPLE CLOSE TO THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN KEPT WALKING
THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN KEPT WALKING THROUGH THE FRAME.
THROUGH THE FRAME. REALLY, ANOTHER ONE?
REALLY, ANOTHER ONE? THAT’S SORT OF -- THAT’S KIND OF
THAT’S SORT OF -- THAT’S KIND OF THE SCARY PART.
THE SCARY PART. THAT’S HOW WE GOT THE
THAT’S HOW WE GOT THE COUNTERINTELLIGENCE
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE INVESTIGATIONS IN THE FIRST
INVESTIGATIONS IN THE FIRST PLACE.
PLACE. INFORMATION ABOUT RUSSIANS AND
INFORMATION ABOUT RUSSIANS AND ABOUT RUSSIAN BEHAVIOR THAT
ABOUT RUSSIAN BEHAVIOR THAT WEIRDLY INTERSECTED WITH ALL
WEIRDLY INTERSECTED WITH ALL THESE PEOPLE ASSOCIATED WITH ONE
THESE PEOPLE ASSOCIATED WITH ONE OF THE TWO PRESIDENTIAL
OF THE TWO PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGNS.
CAMPAIGNS. SO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SAYS
SO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SAYS THEY’RE SPYING ON THE TRUMP
THEY’RE SPYING ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN.
CAMPAIGN. HE TRIED TO SORT OF WALK IT BACK
HE TRIED TO SORT OF WALK IT BACK A NUMBER OF TIMES IN HIS
A NUMBER OF TIMES IN HIS TESTIMONY TODAY.
TESTIMONY TODAY. I’M NOT SURE ANYBODY KNOWS WHAT
I’M NOT SURE ANYBODY KNOWS WHAT HE MEANS, BUT I’M SURE IT’S
HE MEANS, BUT I’M SURE IT’S PLAYING WELL IN THE WHITE HOUSE,
PLAYING WELL IN THE WHITE HOUSE, AND MAYBE THAT’S THE ONLY THING
AND MAYBE THAT’S THE ONLY THING HE CARES ABOUT.
HE CARES ABOUT. I WANT TO SAY, THOUGH, THERE IS
I WANT TO SAY, THOUGH, THERE IS ONE OTHER PART OF THE --
ONE OTHER PART OF THE -- ACTUALLY THE JAMES BAKER
ACTUALLY THE JAMES BAKER TESTIMONY, THE FBI GENERAL
TESTIMONY, THE FBI GENERAL COUNSEL TESTIMONY THAT WE GOT
COUNSEL TESTIMONY THAT WE GOT TODAY THAT I ALSO THINK IS WORTH
TODAY THAT I ALSO THINK IS WORTH PAYING ATTENTION TO.
PAYING ATTENTION TO. AND AGAIN, THIS IS QUESTIONING
AND AGAIN, THIS IS QUESTIONING OF JAMES BAKER BY CONGRESSIONAL
OF JAMES BAKER BY CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATORS.
INVESTIGATORS. JAMES BAKER, THEY’RE QUESTIONING
JAMES BAKER, THEY’RE QUESTIONING HIM AS HIS TIME OF THE FBI’S TOP
HIM AS HIS TIME OF THE FBI’S TOP LAWYER.
LAWYER. QUOTE, QUESTION, YOU HAD SAID
QUOTE, QUESTION, YOU HAD SAID THAT THE PRESIDENT’S FIRING OF
THAT THE PRESIDENT’S FIRING OF FBI DIRECTOR COMEY YOU
FBI DIRECTOR COMEY YOU CONSIDERED TO BE A THREAT TO
CONSIDERED TO BE A THREAT TO NATIONAL SECURITY.
NATIONAL SECURITY. AND MY QUESTION WAS IN WHAT WAY
AND MY QUESTION WAS IN WHAT WAY WAS IT A THREAT TO NATIONAL
WAS IT A THREAT TO NATIONAL SECURITY?
SECURITY? JAMES BAKER, SO THE
JAMES BAKER, SO THE INVESTIGATION AT A HIGH LEVEL
INVESTIGATION AT A HIGH LEVEL WAS ABOUT RUSSIA, PERIOD, FULL
WAS ABOUT RUSSIA, PERIOD, FULL STOP.
STOP. AND IT WAS TRYING TO ASSESS IN
AND IT WAS TRYING TO ASSESS IN THIS PARTICULAR INSTANCE WHAT
THIS PARTICULAR INSTANCE WHAT THE RUSSIANS WERE DOING OR HAD
THE RUSSIANS WERE DOING OR HAD DONE WITH RESPECT TO THE 2016
DONE WITH RESPECT TO THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.
PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. WE WERE TRYING TO INVESTIGATE
WE WERE TRYING TO INVESTIGATE WHAT THE RUSSIANS DID AND WHAT
WHAT THE RUSSIANS DID AND WHAT ANY -- WHETHER THERE WERE ANY
ANY -- WHETHER THERE WERE ANY AMERICANS OR OTHERS WHO HAD DONE
AMERICANS OR OTHERS WHO HAD DONE THINGS IN SUPPORT OF THOSE
THINGS IN SUPPORT OF THOSE EFFORTS, EITHER KNOWINGLY OR
EFFORTS, EITHER KNOWINGLY OR UNKNOWINGLY SO WE COULD
UNKNOWINGLY SO WE COULD UNDERSTAND THE FULL NATURE AND
UNDERSTAND THE FULL NATURE AND SCOPE OF WHAT THE RUSSIANS HAD
SCOPE OF WHAT THE RUSSIANS HAD ATTEMPTED TO DO.
ATTEMPTED TO DO. SO THE EXTENT THAT THIS ACTION
SO THE EXTENT THAT THIS ACTION OF FIRING DIRECTOR COMEY MAY
OF FIRING DIRECTOR COMEY MAY HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY OR WAS A
HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY OR WAS A RESULT OF A DECISION TO SHUT
RESULT OF A DECISION TO SHUT DOWN THAT INVESTIGATION WHICH I
DOWN THAT INVESTIGATION WHICH I THOUGHT WAS A LEGITIMATE
THOUGHT WAS A LEGITIMATE INVESTIGATION, THEN THAT WOULD
INVESTIGATION, THEN THAT WOULD FRUSTRATE OUR ABILITY TO SOME
FRUSTRATE OUR ABILITY TO SOME DEGREE TO ASCERTAIN WHAT THE
DEGREE TO ASCERTAIN WHAT THE RUSSIANS AS WELL AS ANY OTHER
RUSSIANS AS WELL AS ANY OTHER AMERICANS OR OTHERS HAD DONE IN
AMERICANS OR OTHERS HAD DONE IN FURTHERANCE OF THE OBJECTIVES OF
FURTHERANCE OF THE OBJECTIVES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.
THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. SO NOT ONLY -- I GUESS THE POINT
SO NOT ONLY -- I GUESS THE POINT IS NOT ONLY WOULD IT BE AN ISSUE
IS NOT ONLY WOULD IT BE AN ISSUE ABOUT OBSTRUCTING AN
ABOUT OBSTRUCTING AN INVESTIGATION, BUT THE
INVESTIGATION, BUT THE OBSTRUCTION ITSELF WOULD HURT
OBSTRUCTION ITSELF WOULD HURT OUR ABILITY TO FIGURE OUT WHAT
OUR ABILITY TO FIGURE OUT WHAT THE RUSSIANS HAD DONE, AND
THE RUSSIANS HAD DONE, AND THAT’S WHAT WOULD BE THE THREAT
THAT’S WHAT WOULD BE THE THREAT TO NATIONAL SECURITY.
TO NATIONAL SECURITY. OUR INABILITY -- THE INABILITY
OUR INABILITY -- THE INABILITY OR THE DELAYS, THE DIFFICULTIES
OR THE DELAYS, THE DIFFICULTIES WE MIGHT HAVE HAD WITH RESPECT
WE MIGHT HAVE HAD WITH RESPECT TO TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHAT THE
TO TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHAT THE RUSSIANS WERE DOING BECAUSE OUR
RUSSIANS WERE DOING BECAUSE OUR MAIN OBJECTIVE WAS TO THWART
MAIN OBJECTIVE WAS TO THWART THEM, WAS TO THWART THE
THEM, WAS TO THWART THE RUSSIANS.
RUSSIANS. WE ARE, OF COURSE, STILL WAITING
WE ARE, OF COURSE, STILL WAITING TO SEE THE MUELLER REPORT.
TO SEE THE MUELLER REPORT. IT’S NEARLY THREE WEEKS NOW.
IT’S NEARLY THREE WEEKS NOW. WILLIAM BARR, THE ATTORNEY
WILLIAM BARR, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SAYS HE WILL HAND IT
GENERAL SAYS HE WILL HAND IT OVER -- YESTERDAY HE SAID IT
OVER -- YESTERDAY HE SAID IT WOULD BE WITHIN A WEEK.
WOULD BE WITHIN A WEEK. TODAY HE SAID IT WOULD BE SOME
TODAY HE SAID IT WOULD BE SOME TIME NEXT WEEK.
TIME NEXT WEEK. DEFINITELY SOME TIME REALLY
DEFINITELY SOME TIME REALLY SOON.
SOON. SOMEBODY SHOULD ASK HIM TOMORROW
SOMEBODY SHOULD ASK HIM TOMORROW AND SEE WHEN HE IS PLANNING ON
AND SEE WHEN HE IS PLANNING ON RELEASING IT TOMORROW BECAUSE
RELEASING IT TOMORROW BECAUSE PRESUMABLY IT WILL BE A
PRESUMABLY IT WILL BE A DIFFERENT ANSWER.
DIFFERENT ANSWER. THERE REMAINS THIS WEIRD THING
THERE REMAINS THIS WEIRD THING HANGING OUT THERE ABOUT THAT
HANGING OUT THERE ABOUT THAT REPORT WHICH IS THAT BILL BARR
REPORT WHICH IS THAT BILL BARR QUOTES ROBERT MUELLER SAYING
QUOTES ROBERT MUELLER SAYING THAT TRUMP WAS NOT EXONERATED ON
THAT TRUMP WAS NOT EXONERATED ON THE QUESTION OF OBSTRUCTION OF
THE QUESTION OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.
JUSTICE. WE’VE NEVERTHELESS GOT WILLIAM
WE’VE NEVERTHELESS GOT WILLIAM BARR SAYING HIMSELF THAT HE WAS
BARR SAYING HIMSELF THAT HE WAS DECIDING THAT THE PRESIDENT WAS
DECIDING THAT THE PRESIDENT WAS EXONERATED ON OBSTRUCTION OF
EXONERATED ON OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.
JUSTICE. AND NOW WE’VE GOT SIMULTANEOUSLY
AND NOW WE’VE GOT SIMULTANEOUSLY AND SORT OF COINCIDENTALLY NOW,
AND SORT OF COINCIDENTALLY NOW, WE’VE GOT TWO DAYS OF
WE’VE GOT TWO DAYS OF REVELATIONS FROM THE FICK’S
REVELATIONS FROM THE FICK’S FORMER TOP LAWYER TALKING ABOUT
FORMER TOP LAWYER TALKING ABOUT HOW SERIOUS THE OBSTRUCTION
HOW SERIOUS THE OBSTRUCTION WORRIES REALLY WERE, AND HOW
WORRIES REALLY WERE, AND HOW FREAKED OUT THE TOP NATIONAL
FREAKED OUT THE TOP NATIONAL SECURITY OFFICIALS IN THE
SECURITY OFFICIALS IN THE COUNTRY WERE SPECIFICALLY ABOUT
COUNTRY WERE SPECIFICALLY ABOUT THE OBSTRUCTION PROBLEM.
THE OBSTRUCTION PROBLEM. I MEAN, WE’VE GOT NO EXPLANATION
I MEAN, WE’VE GOT NO EXPLANATION FROM WILLIAM BARR ABOUT HOW HE
FROM WILLIAM BARR ABOUT HOW HE LOOKED AT ALL THAT, SCANNED THE
LOOKED AT ALL THAT, SCANNED THE 400 PAGES OF MUELLER’S REPORT
400 PAGES OF MUELLER’S REPORT AND IMMEDIATELY CONCLUDED OH,
AND IMMEDIATELY CONCLUDED OH, DEFINITELY NOTHING HERE, AND I
DEFINITELY NOTHING HERE, AND I DON’T WANT TO TALK ABOUT IT.
DON’T WANT TO TALK ABOUT IT. NOTHING.
NOTHING. BELIEVE ME, I’M THE BOTTOM LINE,
BELIEVE ME, I’M THE BOTTOM LINE, IT’S FINE.
IT’S FINE. I DON’T WANT TO TALK ABOUT IT.
I DON’T WANT TO TALK ABOUT IT. I DON’T WANT TO TELL YOU WHAT
I DON’T WANT TO TELL YOU WHAT MUELLER FOUND.
MUELLER FOUND. I KNOW MUELLER SAYS HE IS NOT
I KNOW MUELLER SAYS HE IS NOT EXON CRATED, BUFF I SAY HE IS.
EXON CRATED, BUFF I SAY HE IS. I WON’T TELL YOU HOW I ARRIVED
I WON’T TELL YOU HOW I ARRIVED AT THIS CONCLUSION.
AT THIS CONCLUSION. THAT’S JUST ME TALKING.
THAT’S JUST ME TALKING. THAT IS STILL WHERE WE ARE
THAT IS STILL WHERE WE ARE TODAY.
TODAY. AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IS
AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IS STILL NOT ANSWERING QUESTIONS
STILL NOT ANSWERING QUESTIONS ABOUT IT STILL.
ABOUT IT STILL. BUT SOMEBODY DID TRY TO PIN HIM
BUT SOMEBODY DID TRY TO PIN HIM TO THE MAT ON IT TODAY, AND I
TO THE MAT ON IT TODAY, AND I THINK BURST A FEW VEINS IN
THINK BURST A FEW VEINS IN FRUSTRATION IN THE PROCESS.
FRUSTRATION IN THE PROCESS. DID YOU ACTUALLY SEE WHAT
DID YOU ACTUALLY SEE WHAT HAPPENED WHEN ATTORNEY GENERAL
HAPPENED WHEN ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR FINALLY GOT PRESSED
WILLIAM BARR FINALLY GOT PRESSED REPEATEDLY ON THAT TODAY BY
REPEATEDLY ON THAT TODAY BY SOMEBODY WHO WOULD NOT TAKE NO
SOMEBODY WHO WOULD NOT TAKE NO FOR AN ANSWER?
FOR AN ANSWER? WE’VE GOT THAT FOR YOU NEXT, AND
